510129_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Uus DIMS 31SM
v il4of Wi ter 116640 a"s �
Facility Number ©- C7 Division of Sod and Water Conservation
rAge�ncy
Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: eRoutine 0 Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: lJ115�J Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: Me
Farm Name: MI- H Earw. _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ 1v iA t M QU 0 _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 14 q o pl Pjfol, c(L , Sfn 46
Facility Contact: �i pp M S hel Title:
Onsite Representative: �f8± H [4 1' Uwh-' Ho
Certified Operator: lvf
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: 6491d r bao
Certification Number: 1$11
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current st'ign Current
Capacity Plop. Wet Pon=1YE"81,0"arcity Pop.
IuII Y €
I jEayer I
I JNon-Layer I
Cattle
Design
Capac�idYty
�rya.eui
Current
Pop:
Wean to Finish
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
l7esign
D °, POu r. Ca{��a'ci
Current
Po .
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
�Q
Q
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Puliets
Beef Brood Cow
f)th'er
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
rw3rma�awi��rm.nenw..wra�reuia.n..,waa.nwn.nurenmrw
rnrrxawwrernartw.we
Discharges„and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [ Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Dg No
❑ Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - a,q 7 1 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes � No [] NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): =6-
Observed Freeboard (in): L�•
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
(' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[5j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
N No
0 NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes CRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Cro T es.
P YP () 0,)4 1 CI�I?_4T,211 sua
13. Soil Type(s): (,Le -a
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
(0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
52 No
[DNA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [5jr No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [g] No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
[.NA D NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Faci I ity Number: 5_1 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [5;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance;
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [!0 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[5kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[5rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ER No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Aw jAf P- eds , Mfff- h6w Co fi6j� at � AA eld Cf +h e ydr ,
slid SO( Vf-i 4I1311-7, Spud,3.af�, Ur tVol -7,or-�,
NS,ii ra+j L C�
ys�
Iljr�1[� -�,ss IvDaag3�
11 I�- In 4 O% WO0030Y
► )1m, i "e to dd`ie,
All sva eueh ble��C&I-ed, bwg� eoayses,
Soy I te* $I I 1IS- , b .e -� tJ p� ,
S � f (e"a Ivf- ( dt b mA,
7 y
Reviewer/Inspector Name: !T'0 il�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 U J�L�I,s[�111('}Pl� �cdet1r,. q OU
Phone: �(Q lgi`4013�
Date: fAj p g
21412015

Facility�No. J� `Farm Name _Cf�j`P Date a/lJ4 g
Permit COC
FI3 Drops,
OIC_ NPDES (Rainbreaker PLAT Annual Cert Daily Pipe )
Lagoon Name, S for s2illway
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Freeboard 1 Last Recorded in
Observed freeboard
Sludge Survey Date
Sludge Depth (ft)ar
Liquid Trt. Zone ft
Ratio Sludge to Treatment Volume ifs 0.45
Date out of compliance/ POA?
Calibration Date
1
2
3 10 dal
4
5
6
7
8
Ring Size in
Design Flow m
Actual Flow
a6
Design Diam. ft
Actual Diam.
Soil Test Date
-no I l' hs- Crop Yield
Transfer Sheets
pH Fields
Wettable Acres
"' RAIN GAUGE
Lime Needed
WUP
Dead box or incinerator
Lime Applied
Weekly Freeboard
Mortality Records
Cu-I Zn-I
1 in Inspections
Check Lists
Needs S (S-1<25)
120 min Insp.
Storm Water
Needs P
Weather Codes
Waste Date
RIMMMA
n�nr�aw
UF��■��■��
u+I IN NU 3 1 i`o r r
V b 34-71
Pull/Field
Soil
Crop
Acres
PAN
Window
Max Rate
Max Amt
0 0�
Verify PHONE NUMBERS and affiliations III
Date last WUP RRO FRO or Farm Records
Date last WUP at farm Lagoon #
App. Hardware Top Dike
Stop Pump
Start Pump
Conversion- Cu-I 3000= 108 Iblac; Zn-I 3000= 213 Iblac

von of Water Resources
Facility Number - �a Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: $`� Departure Time: ; jQ County: Region: PRO
Farm Name:g�Lm4
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: NU) p(P_s1f_&, K[_
Facility Contact: gleif HLLir& j) Title: Cth5Lh7rld— Phone:
Onsite Representative: zr4 P'Iodyog Integrator: cGold f
Certified Operator: J)wjQht H44 Certification Number: ILE%
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current 1
Swine Capacity Pnp.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
I
Dai Calf
)C Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer'
Farrow to Wean
Dr, P,oultr,.
[Layers
Design
Ca achy
Current
P,o
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
:
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
urke s
U_ther
TurkeyPoults
Other1 10ther
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - f a Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): A
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
CZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
jo No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
5'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Caufa I &1A id a L` tLr3 i . Sma 11 a Pa 1'n
13. Soil Type(s): 61 fad R
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [5� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
[5j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available`?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes W No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
Z NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - 01 Date of Inspection: a
2,4. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
E j Yes
R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
JZ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA. [,g NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, -over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any:YES answers and/or any additional=recommendations or any�other comments.
Use drawin &of facility to better explain situatio,ns,.(use additional ages as,necessary).,
a6_01Vi ry li r�eea� 3,s hrs co,�In�i�1 PA b
y dud Sat �# l�il S l I q�`I r } `fit �4�--�,o `F-
a�i- Cd�ibrd�'io� IO�a3,f l�, , Flow=;)&;
a1_ YV05k hWty Ses ed Somile. q 110 so 0 091, San-efi s hare.
Wooasa3 l IkZ%II �`aq rme�a s� �
�l l lg 1 j � 1, y q � �� aid I A ;9
YVa77o3�
W001098 lr5a
�1�alr�
Woo y" � 10 lmlt{ i-
C Pfvj vm' ao acdka nol -le) a47.
6{ I 1 I ng is V rWa4e'
Reviewer/inspector Name: a (3` ,Sehn'elel. Phone: qjq 7gj_%3 t/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � '* Q Date: 0a )fl3 j u
Page 3 of 3 21412015

H4H 0,1ltInMY-1)
"Facility'
No. ' �a Farm Name �W� Date
Permit ` COC 01C! NPDES (Rain breaker PLAT Annual Cert Daily Pipe )
Lagoon Name, S forspillway
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Freeboard / Last Recorded in
Observed freeboard
Sludge Survey Date
) d-)ii
Sludge De th ft
I.$
7
Liquid Trt. Zone ft
7
a,
Ratio Sludge to Treatment Volume ifs 0.45
Date out of compliance/ POA?
CalibrationDate
NMI
Soil Test Date
SLQo)69/
Crop Yield
Transfer Sheets
pH Fields
�
It
Wettable Acres
RAIN GAUGE
Lime Needed
a
WUP
Dead box or incinerator
Lime Applied
f
Weekly,�reeboard
Mortality Records
Cu-I Zn-I
1 in Inspections
Check Lists
Needs S (S-1<25)
120 min. Insp..
Storm Water
Needs P
Weather Codes
MOM
I goo,
i
Verify PHONE NUMBERS and affiliations
Date last WUP RRO � ))q ? FRO or Farm Records
Date last WUP at farm Lagoon #
App. Hardware Top Dike
Stop Pump
Start Pump
Conversion- Cu-I 3000= 108 Ib/ac; Zn-I 3000= 213 Ib/ac

Type of Visit: W Compliance Inspection V operation Review U Structure Evaluation V 'Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a "j Arrival Time: Departure Time: ,5D County: _ Region: R�
Farm Name: H1 H f iltm f
Owner Name: 1J 11/1 Q L �Q
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: I-qqD SM kM 4—
Facility Contact: �MAJ 1`''' j j(he I l Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: IKV Integrator: _ceeldrbw }
Certified Operator: DNl Qhf i a n __ _ Certification Number: 1$ v y
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poaltry
Layer
Design
Capacity
Current
06
Pop.
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
-Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
33
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
D , $nultr
Layers
Non -Layers
Design
Ca aci
Current
P,o P.
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - a Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): a�
Observed Freeboard (in): 3.3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
F�g] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
C] Yes
5d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
DNA
ONE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): CQ61 vonyh 6r01:f, SMQII ".( h
13. Soil Type(s): rf) Wj B
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 50 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [4 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crap Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes [3 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
[2 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facih Number: - Q2 jDate of [ns ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA (5j NE
❑ Yes [ R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ['N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes r5� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any'YES answers and/or any additional recommendations'or any;other'coivments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain sitoationk.(use..additional pages as. necessary):
QG, bti has s„�S66T 47t'A �1A ed hovrf -hrolh a of?
� S 4je_ Svrv� 1D �Il 11S�_ Surd ec� = i,� `Jtr� e=�,I�f' f"44b f Oy blf
- Ore ei,s �f- MOWk C4a mfF3re
a9. Cap bit q f a q)#, I, assy fm, �,o,+e'Vv
-Sol - -stoaa l �1,011s , No11Yn�e n , do(
w
Ja$J�S I1 q SOr11ce1QU-s have-�tevaW_rn�l �el�1r b*Cof�r„Ls 1ess��
YvOl? a�4$ 3q
�I1sh� n075Q �$�� 1 53 %oo Chd_. zi'hc ��d� 00 I"0', 13
10l 311y .
Lagoa, ba%kwa.r Naikek _ Rhar-k ck covel-aid-noho�J vvfre nakdL
p1-edop- ?""down wh,ell able
N I I,,I is v,p 40 dak— ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: M as Phone: 9IZ22�� _)
1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: o
Page 3 of 3 21412014

Facility No._Farm
Name
MIH ccilde N
Date ai-5_[rs
Permit
COC
O1C_
NPDES (Rainbreaker PLAT Annual Cert Daily Pipe)
Lagoon Name, S forspillway
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Freeboard 1 Last Recorded in
Observed freeboard
Sludge Surve Date
(S
0
Sludge Depth ft
-Liquid Trt. Zone ft
,�
Ratio Sludge to Treatment Volume ifs 0.45
Date out of compliance/ POA?
Calibration Date
me - . ..--�—�--
Design-----.
Soil Test Date �I� DO�f� Crop Yield Transfer Sheets
,pH Fields Wettable Acres RAIN GAUGE
Lime Needed WUP Dead box or incinerator
Lime Apppplied Weekly Freeboard Mortality Records
Cu-I I —to O Zn-i L=aab 1 in inspections Check Lists
Needs S (S-1<25) 120 min Insp. Storm Water
Needs P Weather Codes
RUFF IFFI -
11fffLLlyy��l�E�il�i!lr
11i� /
----
r�
PulliField
Soil
Crop_Acres
PAN
Window
Max Rate
Max Arnt
—7
Cis s�aK
as -s'D
-Se se r
-o �a
3S)'
Verify PHONE NUMBERS and affiliations
Date last WUP RRO FRO or Farm Records
Date last WUP at farm Lagoon #
App. Hardware Top Dike
Stop Pump
Start Pump
Conversion- Cu-I 3000= 108 Iblac; Zn-I 3000= 213 Iblac

r
h
-rr%,P,
Type of visit: a Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: QrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 41� Arrival Time: Departure Time: � County: Region: k R n
Farm Name: Ljq_ M j__L71 if Owner Email:
Owner Name: D Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 1440 Pity, U , Sih ir1 hf 'PI'd
Facility Contact: �/&+ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: IR (Olt M if � M Integrator: _ ,,_,_ ,., Mil .... ,.,., ,%h
n
Certified Operator: Dyaaht May Q Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
T
Design Current Design Current
Design Current
t Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Finish La er
F)', 7Eeeder
Dai Cow
Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
o Finish 3
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder aci P.o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers I
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection &'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
II
Designed Freeboard (in): L
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[—]Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[,;2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
tS No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
151 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
0 Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C0111fal mwwd6LS u wd' _
13. Soil Type(s): 6jc ? B s
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [S�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [:]Yes �' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [,2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [,Sj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 15a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Z Yes ❑ No
® Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes PK No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

1
Facility Number: 51 - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to compicte annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
[—]Yes
[-]No
❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[51 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
I If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
5'[Vo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments"(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.­7
ese drawings of facility to betterexplain situations (use additional pages as necessary):'
alp, bwlyht H47o her SVfflcN9if covhlivb, ea hmrjwvyh +-ht eld- C-t l�yer,
W-me "AAd�Jse_j
M0 (`IT'D 51 a l (9 1'T3
vuoo ajq 1003114 1,37
7111 �ume)eve, ►vP�e_ C b Yvg'� Ya►; Pf �1 Wfmy � n U'n to/' woJ Umd � � II f ��'VI)� wd h P her ac a , F-41v `9 6 of ewm c 1o1 4v P
l� �] lm� `'�h � I ��i� kv�'e. e f'
WL-PI d Cot (eet re t olh,
so; I s� f le- SLO 4Y3 3 -2 61 aaa I I a , Yv� I l n r 0v Ja; JeT� �S yee, La9c� b e/� war
j IrnPdt, , icU` 4rae ok -Q�- i he aid heat mefa�, Qe -G eld l.T a b � ekvo*� U�IdQr�
��l,CQli�rafi'� ��a�J�y,asry�m,3►Q hFe.N�ddla",e�e.,
s��d �svrv2 «laaily 1slud�e- i.� �
9 %
Cjpget4 n 0UR PVdUC&-Corr J,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: —aQf14 Sciln�E�Qr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:912 `%gLY23V
Date: it " a7 at Q (.-
214/2011

W H firwS
Facility No. Farm Name Date
Permit COC OICT NPDES (Rainbreaker PLAT Annual Cert Daily Pipe )
FB Drops
Lagoon Name, S forspillway
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Freeboard 1 Last Recorded in
Observed freeboard
Sludge Survey Date
Sludge Depth ft
-Liquid Trt. Zone ft
Ratio Sludge to Treatment Volume if> 0.45
Date out of compliance/ POA?
OeAe ie G
Calibration r - -
mi"�m©�M;
r - • ME.
I--�-�
Design Uiam.-------
. Dian
1).W- ao01 (v wall)-
s L(943 3a I
Soil Test Date _�
SI.O� Crop Yield
Transfer Sheets
pk Fields
1 Wettable Acres
RAIN GAUGE
Lime Needed
WUP
Dead box or incinerator
Lime Applied
Weekly Freeboard
Mortality Records
Cu-I Zn-1
1 in Inspections
Check Lists
Needs S (S-1<25)
120 min Insp.
Storm Water
Needs P
Weather Codes
III------��
P MIN ►, e.
Verify PHONE NUMBERS and affiliations °
Date last WUP RRO 011,ataq FRO or Farm Records
Date last WUP at farm a �I Lagoon #
App. Hardware Top Dike ��g
Stop Pump 1p
Start Pump if '
(b
Conversion- Cu-1 3000= 108 Ib/ac; Zn-I 3000= 213 Iblac toy
I'�

Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation C) Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 'J Departure Time: County: :Z�h+` Region:GZRO
Farm Name: M # yN f r,n�5
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: D-ot �} j�'(��y n Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
1111111111111 Design Current
y` Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
W.et P oultry Opacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pap.
Finish
La er DairyCow
Feeder
-Layer DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
o Finish
o Wean
FFarrow
Design Current D Cow
o Feeder
Dr. P.oultr. Ca lacl P,o Non -Dairy
o Finish
La ers Beef Stocker
Layers Beef Feeder
Pullets Beef Brood Cow
NJ I
Boars
Turkeys
9Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes .0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes��1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'p<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Rumber: , - I IDate of Ins ection:
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes �No
T;.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes E]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes �"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes Po
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ID No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes JD_��o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ,E/J No
❑ NA
[] NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 0--No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps [—]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
2 L Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'Q o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [:]Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking [:]Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes "0 I4o
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ,❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
CA q_j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ YesNo
the appropriate box(es) below. "a Q J 3
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ED'No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes qNo
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes jD"No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Callo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑"NO
❑ Yes La -No
❑ Yes P[,No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
0 NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question" #) Explain any.YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or. any other comments ' 0 i
"
Use drawings of facility toFbettcr`ex lain sitiations (use additional agesEaspecessar) , ,fx.:
1; cr��,or�1 t ti �. a S �� m c� CT) tie 07-7-- a
m0031m00y I5(aYli15(6 ..�
LO t3 00 � S c� l . q
LO 00 Li 110 1, 3 g 11 q', 3
10-5-T3 Q "y i , c. 0-,:-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 22 q 9 0 %
Date: 1 111 3 Th t-
T
21412011

Type of Visit: 0Com Hance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: I Arrival Time: Departure Time: County_o Regi
Farm Name: �I n t.,[ �_ �� Owner Email:
Owner Name: i U y G f ma, n Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Remit_ it ,[/I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: pit 4] i�C h+ �1�►/ n Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
,ucauon ui rarm; L.auiuue: UU11gituue:
1 14 q a Pit +ON 4ci Lis y sAj
S 1- 1'�e d ar75 �JcqW
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
airy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,oultr.
Ca aci
P,oINon-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Othe
:rTurkey Poults
Other
I Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes C2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NB
❑ Yes
qNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili ' Number: - 1 ZM7 jDate of Inspection:
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Fe rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
�-
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
5KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
;Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
P No
[DNA
❑ NE,
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
C;�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
FXNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): 3Q b (IrAQ.p
13. Soil Type(s):
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvernent?
❑ Yes
�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
5rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�no
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
P[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

liacilitj Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;3�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
f5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes �No
❑ Yes FZJ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E?TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes g'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
M'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):'Explain any YES answers and/or any additional. recommendation's or any` other comments:,
Use drawings of facility to better.explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary).
a a 1 a- c c L 1 b cat i n VOS ctd
-1a O t-(
9_S3sN; die l �.�ay5 (g-ao-lt ��w la-���+1� +•�� � � d
�'-
S
l^c�'i`�Q�.1J�� � 1J�v�t�''� V ' . ,✓V�_ vl�� wv"�,�.�- -h .�A�J�' �'�
A.JiJL7C/���
Ha 5 Co two
% . 1 I
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 t OL t\,O— . D e g r,_ O C` C3 t7— ft c-0 e n I- t c 0 y
ao 1 14),
Phone: W
Date: 1 _6 $ -1 3
21412011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Re'aasson for Visit: Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
DaEe of Visit: rrival Time: �l.J �/� Departure Time: County: �dh ap Region:
Farm Name: M o- r(t Fcan AnnZQ
Owner Name: ��T a h t YY_y�V n
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: DLp?I'[n h+ YY\Lw.V Certification Number: 91V19 1$ q a�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design C«urrent
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design C►urrent
Capacity op.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current
Dr, Poultr, Ca .aci Pao P.
Layers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? E] Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes F/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 21412011 Continued

,V
Facility Number: - Date of insection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [—]Yes I /� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? 7`''
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) %%
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes PfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.))
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes �6o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �f]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes �6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 1Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
V1 No
[DNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -I Q Date of Inspection:
O I d the 4,EfllityQ �faiilltto calitrateastepplicatio equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o
25. Is the faAY Z"if oicoommpliance with pe t conditions related to sludge'? If yes, check ❑ Yes !!!❑"No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
tr
l
p = 16
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[:2-No
❑ NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
��No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
T
[�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
T
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
lNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
'
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
I/I No
"���``���'''"'
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[f No
❑ NA
[3 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
T&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a C t O SCE t✓i 1 — tti%.Q.at Ito-Z.LtP_ aO l I
PON PJ;Ch0150rJ (60-t odu ctCxs ; un4 % 1 101 r*gI io
aOl 0 t/x.Vmc lc>Le.d `�--
�
(Q�n� f MAD c.Lir� ✓�
O C'j G 't M1 C,ct-t - *(n 6 0 3 f OC1 q L&ttv
�C\yo p„C ¢cam- 4
Reviewerhnspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
JrX� J N\.b
Phone: / t% ��"4
Date:
2 4/2011

Type of Visit 7 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: D A Departure Time: I� County: JC1CU Region:
Farm Name: 1 N! ( A� Owner Email:
Owner Name: D! I CifGl/j Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:.....
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = Longitude: = ° ❑ 1
Design Current
Design C«urrent Design Current
Swine t?apacity Population
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle C►►opacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Layer I
1 ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
I ILI Non -Layer I
1 ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes El No
[I NA
El NE
ElNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [:1 No
[--]Yes ,214o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ;?rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continuer!

Facility Number: — la Date of Inspection LZL/�LLI�
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
eNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
WfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
UfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[;jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[;fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
I?r"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
.`A '.71
_VoPJ h) t' c h�o t.so'V — 1 or r oo Pcm euI IVIv ¢3c&t., c�qto-,o
I D f a a' 10 " `�`"i" &40 ad 9
W 3(11Y/40 7
al" r)
a,Q +.fie cq
n
I�r rL.)
c4p fa J 7
wo OMNI,
r,

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ;dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ;YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuetures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
16 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[21 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) ";Explain any`YESfanswers and/or any,recommendatrons or. any o hr c nmen"ts 11
l * '.
ro.. re.�, - x '�� �r 1.•. �'1"�.,
Use'drawmgs-of facility to better ez�larn situatwns: (use additional pages as necessary)
'i
i:<.
_YY�� � ti _s 11f t w 4+ A
ReviewerhnspectorName Phone: I' ow
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
1218104 Continued

Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance ' I
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: L� I J11 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: v Regil
Farm Name: 01AAS M Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c =1 = I[ Longitude: ❑ ° = 6 0 "
We—s i g—nj I Current
Design Cnrrent
Design Current
Swine C►apacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Laver
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dais Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes,,ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
E!fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes FrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — a9 I Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZIN o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes,,EJONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes /`-J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes .ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes )2N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
M. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �'l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElExcessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) /
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
t2. Crop type(s)
U. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Jam-' o ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes/
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Al sj' 3 i !1 h4� i.WP i<1 �yP�P S.f3? i:SY
rC6mments (refer to question#):'Explain any YESanswers and/or any recommendations or any other comments'
f } S i \ 1
Use drawings of facility to: better explain situations. (use additional "pages as necessaryNO
) k� "1 4 � L s 3
f
r
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
P i
Phone-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 'Continued

• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents �f
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes I(J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes —No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes P�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes P3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which. cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
Vj No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
' iawings: WHIM �Additional=Comentsand/oD , r HF
ct
Wld cezn,o �c
.
919-9�5 979s
ql9 C715 -3qys
Page 3 of 3
12128104

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other [I Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: LJ� Departure Time: County " Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: I Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 c 0 t = 11
Longitude: = e = 6 =
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
C*attle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish I
JE1 Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder I
I[] Non -La er
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish I I
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
IE]
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish a
❑ Layers
❑Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes Y[ N0 El NA El NE
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Plo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes
PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
"*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes,;allo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
[;rVo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): apj4rd
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[:3No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
rr
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
[YNo
❑ NA LINE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
�ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
PrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�YNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate ManurelSludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
['No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
�.-�.'�a�ai�4!"s�wr�®has A t r�!".$��� '��s ����_' s �ir,`� a��r�'S•� '`.:^��¢Y���,i" ��� �
mment?�(�refertoquestion#} EExp[a �n an yYESanswers�and,/orny�rcto. mendaons or any other comments:
[U-jedrwing ,ofrfaciltty to,better¢wzplam ituations°(use a1t on Ipa.i#s:�hx1.?o- >x-a'a.&�kE 0• E%i�`�'tt,d.�s��ii�s Ah
�
r q
Reviewer/inspector Name F, Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:LjjkL Date:
Page 2 of 3 1 12128104 " Continued

Facility Number: :Jay Date of inspection
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropiiate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E;rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
lJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
)dNo
❑ NA
[:IN E
CcL�10
tj)�ad�(R a . a,
yTp - a bs q
Page 3 of 3 12128104

n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510129 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510129 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComRljgnce Inspection Inactive or Closest Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Johnston Region: R3le6ah
Date of VISIt: 03/20/2008 Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Farm Name: M & M Farms
Owner: Dwiaht Mayo
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 3352 Hwy 70 E Smithfield NC 27577
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 1440 Prggton Rd Smithfield NC 27577
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Goldsboro Hoo Farms Inc
Latitude:35°27'00" Longitude:78°15'15"
US70 East to Stevens Chapel Rd (SR2310). Turn right - go to Preston Rd (SR2516) tum right farm on left.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Certified Operator: Dwight H Mayo Operator Certification Number: 18484
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Dwight Mayo Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
SOIL SAMPLE DUE NOW
LIME WILL BE APPLIED THIS SPRING
MR. MAYO WILL KEEP CROP RECORDS WHEN HE BAILS - GRAZED IN PLAN
FIELDS HAVE GOOD COLOR AND APPEAR TO BE WELL MANAGED
E�UTION'ON'[AGGOQN_F_REEBOARD
W. MAYO WANTS TO SAVE WATER FOR SPRING PLANTING
DROUGHT THIS PAST YEAR HE'S CONCERNED IF HE'LL HAVE ENOUGH WATER FOR VEGETATION TO MAKE IT
THROUGH SUMMER
"'DESIGNED FREEBOARD-IS.26:L VEL IS CURRENTLY 27- REEL AND PUMP WERE LOCATED AT A DIFFERENT FARM-
MR-MAYO WAS PLANNING ON RELOCATING REEL AFTER NEXT WEEKS APPLICATIONS AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION.
L i! r\ (J 0 �/W �,�� t' \ � Page: 1

Permit: AWS510129 Owner -Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number : 510129
Inspection Date: 03/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,360 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 3,360
Total SSLW: 453,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
igoon #1 26.00 27.0(
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510129 Owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number: 510129
Inspection Date: 03/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 1101111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 1101113
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0130
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
Cl
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page; 3

Permit: AWS510129 Owner -Facility; Dwight Mayo
Inspection Date: 03/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 510129
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
U. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Facility Number
°Q Division of Water Quality
vision of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit 91"*outine
6ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑I �DeJnied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Timer County: 0 V Regio • Ra
Farm Name: 1i�i Q Ii'� „Tvr,�} Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator:.961Z % qy Operator Certification Number: llcp�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = ❑ Longitude: = ° = ' ❑
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
03
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design. Current
Cattle. Capacity: Populatio,n_<
Cow
Calf
EEIDairy
Heifer
Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 4LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes (f�_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ET -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes E�FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ,moo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
cif any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentZNo
reat, notify DWQ
El 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) dNo
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
ElExcessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) V,
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or I O lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
(!40
El NA
[I NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
,
l[J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Sit tur Date:
fD 0 a ` ()--t _ ] ;5 a 7 of- *t- 7 `3 $ r 7 / 5 c/ 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection J! I�L[[{d Q'
0
Required Records & Documents
19. Diti the facilitV fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes )2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
��
D
20. D►o3es theIfaci ity fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WOp ❑ Ch kl• t ❑ D ' n ❑ Ma s ❑Other
ec s s esig p
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box
'below. El Yes JZNo El NA El NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis jJ Soil Analysis rite Transfers ldAnnual Certification
Rainfall �tocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections 9Monthly and I" Rain Inspections�Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit'? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ,WNo
El Yes XNo
❑ Yes �No
El Yes 9No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes qfNo
❑ Yes [4No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
;6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
El NE
El Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Ss 5Wmt11LL a h o 7 Ate ---
C
c� -
hCt Cjz qDo e,6t°,.OLD
.. s
50AIIA/0A
fJ v 12/28164
�i

Facil�,.... ivision of Water Quality
ity Number ID Division of Soil and Water Conservation
�.. Ell - 0 Other Agency
g Y
Type of Visit IMompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit AtRoutine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I 16 U I Departure Time: CountyZkhC%:36L Region.M-1C
Farm Name:
Owner Name: A)U I_r6di j- MAY
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
]❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: =c = i = Longitude: = ° ❑ , =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
- - I ___ _ A 10 Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population.
❑
Daia Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Daiat Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures: 1
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �AIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
zNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
WrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 5 — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 4
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [--IPAN > 10% or ] 0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
7,No
❑ NA
El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
t6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. {use additional pages as necessa ft
._
A.
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
" I2/28/04 - Continued

.Facility Number: 5 1 — Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate 9f Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ElNE
the appropirate box. Po
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need im rovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis oil Analysis Vaste Transfers El Annual Certification
ainfall ❑ Stocking nProp Yieldainfall ❑120 Minute Inspectoo svlonthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ElWeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? X ❑ Yes ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Pio ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XN, ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ElYes l� O ❑ NA El NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El Yes yJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes VNo El NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? El Yes [ No ❑ NA El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1 ' i/ • • • ` /' i �� Igo
r �
1 f
j41V8U5T-;5 1-1-7-07 l0059(09
PAO I,7
1
Z N 1 tPV 12lmw
Cv.94y

S
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510129
Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251129
tI---II
0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspectmon
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Johnston
Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 12/05/2006
Entry Time:09:35 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: M & M Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Dwight Mayo
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: ,3352 Hwy 70 E
Smithfield
NC 27577
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°27'00"
Longitude: 78°15'15"
U$70 East to Stevens Chapel Rd (SR2310), Turn right - go to Preston Rd (SR2516) turn right farm on left
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Dwight W Mayo Operator Certification Number: 18484
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Dwight Mayo Phone:
24 hour contact name Dwight Mayo Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251129 Owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number : 510129
inspection Date: 12/05/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
# 19. Expired CoC (4/30/2003) in notebook, Current one unavailable. Copy CoC and Permit to be mailed to Producer.
# 27. Producer will work with County SWCD to get PLAT done if necessary.
2005 Stocking and mortality records available, Producer will get all 2006 records from his service man and make them available
during next inspection.
Current WUP dated 6-29-1999.
- Producer intends to revise his WUP to include additional fields while taking out filed/pull 1. Will submit copy of Revised WUP to
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office.
` Soil sample report sent to Raleigh in August, awaiting results
" Waste Analysis:
7/19/2006 = 2.2 (only pumped in August 2006).
• Reviewed waste application in August, records are complete and balanced.
New waste sample has been sent to Raleigh, To be used for next pumping.
" Rainfall and Lagoon Freeboard levels have been recorded.
" Irrigation Calibration done 5-2-2006, @ 262GPM
#25 Producer says he has exemption on Sludge survey but letter not available. Will check with central office.
New IRR2 forms to be mailed to producer
Page: 2

Permit: NCA251129 Owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo
Facility Number: 510129
Inspection Date: 12/05/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,360 750
Total Design Capacity: 3,360
Total SSLW: 453,600
Waste Structures
Type IdentiFler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon #1 26.00 39.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA251129 tuner -Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number : 510129
Inspection Date: 1210512006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify'DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA251129 Owner -Facility: Dwight Mayo
Inspection Date: 12/05/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 510129
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Gilead
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page, 5

Permit: NCA251129 Owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number : 510129
Inspection Date: 12/05/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ONO ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?,
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA251129 owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number : 510129
Inspection Date: 12105/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0000
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 Cl ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Type of Visit T Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: `-' Arrival Time: FYY'
q Departure Time: Countyd Region:Farm Name: ' �' \ Owner Email:
cl 6T
Owner Name: C^ Phone: l�
- a
Mailing Address: V �'i� �[ �1N ` g4 ` l ` - C
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: �� m
Certified Operator:
A �'kl7
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator: �''` t"`� 1^12" „1,.4 I� • r
Operator Certification Number: 1�4�
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: y� Latitude: = 0 �7 Longitude: = ° = g ="
u % I (i'P—,1,2 V13' p 1� �J ���lYr, ��, �' a `4-,j
(PL -2- �_) L ) I V k'
�esignclturrent Design
Current Design
Current
Swine [NallacUtYAL0pulatiFRI Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer I
I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
EA Feeder to Finish
o
U
El Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
El Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
La ersElBeef
Stocker
Gilts
NLa
ers
rEon-
El Beef Feeder
PoBoars
Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
El Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
I® No
❑ NA
El NE
other than from a discharge?
r
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Z Date of Inspection 1 ft.l
.Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Ef-ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
r
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): I
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ❑Yes No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ElNA [INE
through a waste management or closure plan? 7
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes `�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? []Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) l
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require r] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Mo [I NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes <ONo [I NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) jj
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes `P No [INA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElYes 10
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to.qu.estion #)::'Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendatiohs,or any other comments
UseAr.awings of facility to better explain situations ;,(use additional pages as;necen'ssary):
VNI
Reviewer/Inspector Namei�_., ;-.I Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: z Date: o,
Page 2 of 3 (J t ` v 12/UA 4 Conti ued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Imo) !u E I
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
Oyes
10
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
f�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and V
Rain Inspections
❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
rzz;�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
"�DVo
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
P NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
IRNo
❑N�A�0
NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
ElYes
ElNo
NA
19 NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
4� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
'E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
id
4
Additional .Comments and/or ;Drawings
Vlj��
•I,,,y / w-\-^-� 1 C. u`-.iI �:. I.J�G~�.ca. 1� li V'i ,1J L.R.._ � lCA ';Zl,-
\'\ Okf �•�.-� `% ���'4 ,oC.: U�G7, �y:�✓1 ��J1
Vj �,�'- �• Q �,' t_� l� ,.,ai �- Z.c�v b, y2_CcU 1` «,-e Cam, `�
C
Page 3 of 3 C�.f �'� Gam`'-� �1 —�``z ' 1..�c� .�r`.6� k,42/28/04.2... 3 '-1 V
r 2 � --c� � . �-ck. 1 1 r2 (A v �� L

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510129 Facility Status: Active Permit: ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations RevieW I Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston _ Region: Raleigh _ ___
Date of Visit: 07/06/2006 Entry Time:Q8:40 AM - - Exit Time: 09:45 AM
Farm Name:
Owner: Dwight Mjyp
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Qg2S4 1 ., .., ...__., Pine Level NC 27568
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: " Longltude:78°15'15"
US70 East to Stevens Chapel Rd (SR2310). Turn right - go to Preston Rd (SR2516) turn right farm on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Dwight H Mayo Operator Certification Number. 18484
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Dwight Mayo Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Current soils and waste samples at NCDA lab.
Has yet to require waste application from this lagoon, but impending.
15) Producer needs to concentrate on preparing fields for waste applications.
W.U. Plan written for grazing; if not to be grazed may increase N application rate by 25% (225 X 1.25 = 281 IbNlac.)
25 Variance granted for sludge survey (new lagoon); letter dated 6/13,2005 specifies sludge evaluation not required for first 5 years
per NRCS lagoon Std., however, lagoon implemented 2001 thus sludge survey due in 2006. To be submitted with March 1, 2007 for
2006 annual certification.
PLAT has not been requested of the Johnston SWCD. Unsure if ever issued to the producer, being pursued within DWQ at this time.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251129 Owner -Facility: Dwight Mayo
Facility Number : 510129
Inspection Date: 07/06/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon #1 26.00 39.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA251129 Owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number: 510129
Inspection date: 07/06/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00011
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storag e & Treatment
--
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
T. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste managements ystem other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA251129 Owner -Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number: 510129
Inspection Date: 07/06/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Gilead
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the `receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: NCA251129 Owner - Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number: 510129
Inspection Date: 07/06/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: NCA251129 Owner -Facility. Dwight Mayo
Facility Number: 510129
Inspection Date: 07/06/2006 Inspection Type: operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues
............................................
Yes
No
NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■
❑ ❑
• Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0
❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0
❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: NCA251129 Owner -Facility: Dwight Maya Facility Number, 510129
Inspection Date: 07/06/2006
Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for VlsIt: Routine
Technical Assistance
Needed
Provided
34 Waste Ian revis
ion sion or amendment
❑
❑
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
❑
36. Review or evaluate waste plan wlproducer
❑
❑
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
38. Missing components (list in comments)
❑
❑
39. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
40. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
42. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
❑
45. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
❑
48. Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
❑
49. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
50. Site evaluation
❑
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
52. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
53. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
54. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
57. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
58. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
Q
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
Q
61. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
62. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
63. Mortality BMPs •
❑
❑
64. Waste operator education
❑
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
❑
67. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑ .
69. PLAT Assessment
❑
70. Other
❑
❑
Page: 7

Permit: NCA251129 Owner -Facility: Dwight Mayo Facility Number: 510129
Inspection Date: 07/06/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
List Improvements made by Operation
Improvement t
Improvement 2
Improvement 3
Improvement 4
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Page: 8

I
1
'Division of Water Quality
1JETERIQ=ber j (Y� (Z 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency`
Type of Visit ecompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit-45Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: -oS Arrival Time: ! = 7� Departure Time: County: J 1+4,STZe Region:
Farm Name: .___ __ ___M_5_M______ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: Me E
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �`"�' GLUT �A y'� Integrator: L cD Sx")e_-'b
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [ ---- 10
= L.._❑ Longitude: =] ° 0 f
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish I [
❑ Wean to Feeder I `r
❑ Feeder to Finish 1 3 I pr
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
tIG
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Murkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑/1<io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes f� No El NA El NE
[IYesx No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

y
Facility Number: 51 — IZ9 Date of Inspection !
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
12 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E
[I NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
E�,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
U/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [;YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? !!!!!!
Waste Applicatinn
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ElNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? i
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
6] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Driti ❑ Application Outside of Area
zz s Sa
12.
Crop type(s) C , 'y o
13.
Soil type(s) G C.—
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
7 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 2 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination" ❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
5, L,A (_ J r��S ' c ��.� A- V�Z4_ S Z j �E" e+ )Z-S to s +c , TN LA. s I M Pla "r-A j
TEA S��A`( �� F. LA $� �� ►zi `"�- SUt T .D Q T_G F—TA-Te-4) FbP—
AC mrs -r" Q � P� r V—41EC�v ems, 'FL -At -Jr T� t�sT a `� � >�, 6 A"IVS W
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: �j r�'7/%UJ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: w.. Date: 7 % Zt /�aS
12128104 1 Continued

Facility'Number: $ —R,
Date of Inspection 2- �►
_Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WDP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate boxbelow.
cI&f I L1_7�109,
❑ Yes Zo
El NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste implication ❑ Weeklyfreeboard ❑ Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ Waste
Transfers ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Ray�all ElStgtt king ❑ Crop Yield El Mine Inspections ❑ Monthly an Rain Inspections ❑
CC
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes �0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ?fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes 7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes P-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) Vr
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ElYes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
LhGnoW 14N C -fO"7 YET- F—, L F=D � —roav tiff To ?�M•. �" .
(3f,e JiQe—, V-T-S Js sT-' C_6h d F LVt&eR-�Q+��� MG S�+-t4 G,E jc-V fLVr_?
V44,-A..rc e. G oEA . #"�_;E�P z a o .S~-
e-
4#r"C W-XCL]iJGV 149N41-+►G 1-4
12128104

k
Type of Visit 4 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: D Time: �
Facility Number
Not O eration 1 0 Below Threshold
'Permitted to Certified ©Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: C'_ r X—C .L i" AA County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: uJi Ff�` �A`{`a Integrator:-533`��
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a 6 C& Longitude 0 1 K
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I F-E
DaiFeeder to Finish a /Zc'1D ❑ Non -La er Non-Dai
40 Farrow to Wean
- -
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Nmber of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ t.a Gaon Area ❑ S ra
uField Area E
- ---
. ^k
Holding i"onds 1,Solid Traps, ID No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharees &Stream Iml2a t�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;6No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes zNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [� No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway. ❑ Yes --,No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: jl — Date of inspection
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes ZNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes Z�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify° DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes XNo
6 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? El Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes (� No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
I I - Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
PNo
12. Crop type -.( RA1 1 A5 ;ter S_(7
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Wa to Management Plan (CAWMP)?
L`r�
❑ Yes
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? T�
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
,fNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
t6No
Required Records -& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
;2rNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
qq.� ��pp�� 1 sh3
❑ Yes
�o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? {iel irrigation, freyJ�ard, wa�fe'�nalysis & soi]�pI-�reports)
El Yes
ZNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
ZNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
'�ZNo
22. Fail to notify regional D4N`Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
�No
(ie! discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes.O'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes '23"No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
uestion:'"E ipiaia
l•:�'a��,�,�' �' ." .. reswers'andlor P" SIt�P �� "•P- Crz+�aa�w�ar�2'�aw.�=.s��.,rr'� .r'��" r � ,;„ f �,�'ts �•
Comments'{refer #o q'any YES asay�cr�t�ecammetadartons ar a y otheb r,commknts�;��` sty
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additiflnal pages,as necessary) 3 t
a , M;`•ko a_...., ,L:d »iws�zh+�..,a.'.:._m.. d,;_uk,_�:...ips_➢��, F.3a�s€t�.,...k�. e..:a.4,n�;,�„F4 !@.y,"v LF�r. ,t�.�sh ;ai �.¢ `.c .rEh.!1�� ,a: Field CoUY ❑ Final Notes
Afyi o- f, ;�rpaytcsl $PL, c F Ly �;scwcs Pcgr WA Vow— L'--7T�
AT ail ,'1 L uSs 5 iVC-C C-0 Paz_
4S5: (r _5
LAJ S °T D t rLsrA- C.s 9A ; J Pa-C Alm .r t :�i2 (, - �'P +f ^^ �•f
Reviewer/Ins ector Name'" " i� '�`:� W
P ;4 9z dn.._ ' d
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 1 L Continued

Facility Number: 5 — 1 Z Date of Inspection B
or Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes No
[,Kddlffiq ADtaw,in s:
co
0
1
(p
1�
r
N
W
Q
05103101

Type of Visit CMompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 3 `�3
Facihty Number
kMotOyerational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted -`Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: L_E 1"M County: -1
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 41 I Gintegrator: G a
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle
❑ Horse Latitude
Ov C`
0«
Longitude
Design -
Current
-Design
Current
Design.::: °.Current,-:,;
Swine Capacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish 3 3 6 Q ?
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacitv Po ulation Cattle Capacitv Po ulation
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Nan-Dai
❑ Other - - - - _ --
Total Design„Capacity
Total SS1,W
Ntiinber of Lagoons t ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La von Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /:Solid+Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
_
x w �=
Discharges _& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes jNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ZNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ONo
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 9No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Y:/—w
No
Waste Collection && Treatment //j
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structur
identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Continued

1 t
Facility Number: $ f — f Z Date of Inspection 131 I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aimlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
z%&tr
12. Crop type L, . a 4ZM
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & D c ment
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Perms] regqadily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified An�mal Wa§te Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes L3'No
❑ Yes O/ No
❑ Yes ;3"No
❑ Yes ;;(No
❑ Yes plllo
❑ Yes ;2(o
❑ Yes ;11<0
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
,2 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes F"Ko
❑ Yes E3No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes CI -No
❑ Yes DNo
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ Yes L2'fIo
❑ Yes J, TNo
❑ Yes _Ia No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
( q ) .� 6
C mments• refer toa uestion # Explain any y'Manswernd/or'any recommendahons,or any, other c mrnentti
Use;drawings of facility to.better explain situations: (use additional pages as nec,issary,):. field Copy ❑Final Notes
k..s kill : .
ld As ..r•.- jia� Y- F, ^ � ` t-A 4o s� � � mot,. 'F � t-e�' � Cr) firt�s ►� Arm c,' q-cco `� E.c1-ads
74c AA_O (6?-31 G s6� 14t.Sa Q-EVAT�Eb -t .j �il 13 B�9}
p; f3 F.Tcjj t At. S`rpr/� 4\0 i S:rvL
)a� �,f�.r�A�i..f. A"c.��,r �r�c, a� �la,1i`e� �� n!� ���A�b�1 ,cyx-�► .�-
Reviewer/Inspector Name 6;. p~ 0c7s_ �.
Reviewertinspector Signature: Date: .3 03
05103101
k
Continued

Facility Number: S I — I z i Date of Inspection 3 a3
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
JM-fe-s ❑ No
❑ Yes "N f�o
ElYes E No
❑ Yes 7EKo
—
❑ Yes yJ No
❑ Yes ,0 No
❑ Yes ElKo
-
LA'tidltlagaliCscimments akd/-Orat icLawings:
i
ZY •.]9 "—Kr %c z `4F W R<� $y P J, AL 9 UPO, Rom_
05103101

......., s61,10-Z—
Type of Visit ,QjCompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z Dale of Visit: 6 0"L Time:
Q Not Operational OBelowThreshold
�J Permitted ZCerdfied 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ..................... Q C.�,......N., . .............................. ........................... County: ...... Sa.Y.^1.S ru .�...........................................
Owner Name: ...........................................
Facility Contact: ............................................................................... Title:
MailingAddress:.....................................................................................................................
ti
Onsite Representative:..... ..... j!"� ....................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ......................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo:................................................................................._..:.
Phone No:
Integrator:...... �s?. fl. s... .....4..........................
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 64 Longitude ' 6 64
Design a'' Cnr`rent Design Current Desi
Ca ci Po ulahon .'Pool Cattle �Y. CrCa aci .:IPo ulat*on., _. P.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
3-3
t 4 3o
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer '' : ❑ Dairy
„❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
.�
- Tatal Design Capac�fy
g ' i" T�Number of Lagoons ; Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area,
j` "HohduigNl'ndsl,SolidiTraps,; No Liquid Waste Management System
E; , ❑ 9 g y t s, A atiss n F, rt,.
Discharees & Stream I, mpaCty
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes ,0No
❑ Yes J� No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes , �No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 7<0
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................... ..............
Freeboard (inches): }�
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: Sr' — ! Date of Inspection I I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [:]Yes ;2No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ff No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JZNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Wasle Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes fidNo
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes �3 No
12. Crop type L . 4��r•�1 ti D► (?�7.fs:� S - G
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Man (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Rgmirred_Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit
//orr��ot er Ir3 t readily available? El Yes eNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CetttfIUSimal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) L El Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ imga iorf, fre#oard, waste a lysis & soil sam�reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes !�rNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes jQ Na
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes VNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 'J No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Ciiniments [refer to question #) rEaiplalnsany�S answers a d/o any s eComme>Ytlutions ar any" other Mnmen s '* p
drawings afafa�cility tnib�etter, exp uatlons u`seadditional pagcs�as'necessary) OTield Copy Final Notes
^�❑ h
pas�i st~ TJ2�A \r%,Csr r"A t-, 'Q J
F" Pv
+N'c"i �(�-dY •� �� �+� kS iJn%L� X e� y 1p A M P
,S-,i$S`rAt4 i'0+ _ 5pa6 rIC4,161L 04 LR60,W4 Q3r j-A:r! J�F-EJyr p Zel--OA-F- � r C;04-/ tit_.1?M4q
r-A L-L .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 Date: 6 It I
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 6 aZ
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Cl Yes
)� No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
�No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
El Yes
�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
&No
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
ZNO
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
pf o
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: r
AL
O5103101

of
(Type of Visit A Cliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint, O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 1 Date of Visit: oo I o Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
�ermitted �ertified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .................£.......��y ..
�aRMMA } y:......................................................I..............................
�.!=4?...
>rr.Q L AlAlCount ...................../....... .
OwnerName: ........................................................................................................................... Phone No:........................................................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Title:
Onsite Representative:...., .................
.... ........ ..........
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No: .......
.................................................................................. ..........................
Integrator:......��r�Lf,� s f3°'e o cYt �' Lea .j ta-
................................................................
Operator Certification Number:
z j A
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 64 Longitude • d 66
.D"esignif ur'r'ent i, Design ;;Current DesiP
IC..r.`....... Cit >tci Pp uladon,.,: Poultry :Ca aci Population Cattle ,Ca` ac
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
3 3 a
3 6 v
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design 'Capacity_
T6tW SSLW
Namber:af t,agaons' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Hold>tng Ponds l Saud Trap"s'' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )zNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes gNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. ,Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes'0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [2�No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ................................................
❑ Spigzg_ ❑ Yes ;No
r rc 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ';7 "7'2-
5100
Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type t✓ !+: t_rt-nw DPr �C�z S - C> Q'.�
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in We Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeVoeid, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No 8040000r, 00"Clendia-s *06 pp(60- ill�tejog this' visit; • X64 will •tee¢ite do; futtbtr•
corresnorideace: about: this visit: .................................. .
❑ Yes &io
❑ Yes )2!rNo
❑ Yes Pfo
ja es ❑ No
❑ Yes VN0
❑ Yes J_
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes 'ErNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
es ,["["No
❑ Yes 12'No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes j2fNo
❑ Yes P10
❑ Yes dNo
[ ❑ Yes 140
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 'Z�io
❑ Yes ,(No
❑ Yes ,)?�No
y� c�awlsra�fcl"E� �ePr tYtS �JWs ?st:af. Tti RE�0J,9-F_tNe-Jr' Fay .sn'L.(_VJar
sa`� 5' 33aor� ti�c4aS JrL.sc+ �ai Ta TrA$li�' tjG jfiG�iTQ"�i c"i/ t)iS cAtl"S�+o ''dabs Q"o
�} M':J riJ RASa.�AaL� tJ,AnI'' r`t`fi:-�•-
i�j, u9 ,-A fr JSi=, f?F PQJ vT+L l L�, rl'sk.•
e,4r era ToQy.cla><►R� r�►S
ay �Z.. - , - 3 t ,E Dy. r rr $� t�K`"�.i"`1"'i`�,. �w r � � � ^t^ � w�s�„r1 �r� s 11 a i�.i,�„�}•r iS�
Reviewer/Inspector Name f'=f`.•.ltf.:.ts ;` rt,lrr'„3.,'`i::'to�,l,.�t�:.5',%'.'i;;'},%.a..3tlF,:tit,'r'i'�t�.;"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .Date: 176 [ -t.1 5100

Facility Number: s r- I z mate of Inspection t
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ;'Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �io
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P'llo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes Rq o
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes PIKo.
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes J31No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:e i - � r � � t � `� ;t" F �' � � ,>? E � u � i� -"
5/00

�,lr APR 2 9 2009
NCDENR L
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resour`Cd,§1i
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 28, 2009
Dwight Mayo
M & M Farm
3352 US 70 Hwy East
Smithfield, NC 27577
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWS510129
M & M Farm
Johnston County
Dear Dwight Mayo:
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required before we
may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days of receipt of this letter:
You were requested to submit two copies of your facility's waste utilization plan (WUP or, nutrient
management plan, NMP) .with your permit renewal .application:• Our record show both copies of the waste plan
�. are missing.in your permit application; Please submitmissing copies of your current.WUP orNMP to my
attention at the address given at the bottom of the first page -of this letter.
:Please:be awareahat>you are responsible for meeting all requirements set-forth,in-.North Carolina rules:and
,...regulations..Any-oversights that occurred inthe review of -the subject applications package are.still-the
responsibility.ofthe applicant. In addition, any omissions made inresponding•to.the above items sshall.resulvin
future requests for.additional information.
Please.reference.the subj ecV application number when providing the requested. information. All-documents,shall
be: signed;.sealed-.and dated, with two (2) copies submitted.to-my attention:at,the address below. .Please -note -that
failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date -may result in your. .
application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Maxwell Foods Inc
APS Files- AWS510129
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
lntcrnet: www,ncwaterguality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl90% Post Consumer Paper
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
o e NhCarolina
Natwrallil
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]
�nr

0 -k
FROM :M&M FRRMS FAX NO. :9199659795 Mar. 04 200e 10:40AM P1
Animal Waste Management System
Operator in Charge Designation Form
Faciiity/Farm Name: F
Permit #: Facility IO#: r - Q. Couw.. XL'f�
Operator In Charge (OIC):
Cert
Rrst &WCW LUC etc
Work Phone: (34) , �- Home Phone: (412 ) 9
Signature: Date: 6 '7
Optlonak Backup OIC
Cart 8:
Rru mkwb Lett 4, �. Vft
Work Phone: ' Home Phone:
Signature: Qate� -
Owner/Permittee Name: ��� 4 U
Phone #:
Signature. ;14Date.-— /U
(Owner or auMWzbd agent)
Mail or fax to: WPCSOCC
DIVISlon of Water Ouality
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618
Fax: [phone]
(Retain a copy of this form for your records)
R*007 .

Michael F. Fasiey, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
!ry14, ry ;
July 1, 2407
Dwight Mayo 1'2 , Z Nnf r
M.& M Farms
�7
3352 Hwy 70 E
Smithfield, NC 27577_
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510129
M&MFarms
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Dwight Mayo:
In accordance with your application received on 22-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Dwight Mayo, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the M & M Farms, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 3360 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 11I.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
IVY` Carolina
�tura!!{!
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax l: (919) 70-0588
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmadve Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

._ If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the.obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
4114 -
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section .
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS510129

O�O� W A 7- Rq
t`
Dwight Mayo
M & M Farms
3352 Hwy 70 East
Smithfield, NC 27577
Dear Dwight Mayo:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA251129
M & M Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. -The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on March 7, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Dwight Mayo, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS510129 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to", the management
of animal waste from the M & M Farms, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 3360 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste .Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each.15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions sand limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitorine conditions in this hermit. The Devices to Automatically Ston Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
aarr��
'�1�3
RMENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:dh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
'the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 5714700. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
u Y APR 2 3 2003
DENR RAI_EIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA251129
- Permit File AWS510129_
NDPU Files

w AT
�0F 4R
G
Michael F. Easley, Governor
'0
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
t7 .r
Alan W. Klimek, A.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 13, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7002 2410 0003 0274 6686
Mr. Dwight Mayo
M&M Farms
PO Box 481
Pine Level, NC 27568
RE: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Facility # 51-129
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Mayo:
�C'},NR Rt�LE.4GN Et�.GtG11P,1. `)1i,t�.
Ms. Betsy Gerwig with the Division of Soil and Water Conservation notified DWQ that
you needed clarification on the permit requirement related to sludge surveys. The permit says
that it must be done within one year of permit coverage. However, the MRCS Standard 359
(Waste Treatment Lagoon) says that it does not need to be done until the lagoon has been in
operation for five (5) years.
For the M&M Farms facility, this means that the sludge survey should be done after 5 years of
operation, and then every year thereafter. Our records indicate that the farm began operation in
2001, so the first sludge survey will be needed in 2006. The results of the 2006 sludge survey
are to be submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due on March 1, 2007.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. 1f you have any questions, please call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
vt
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File# 51-129
John Hunt, Raleigh Regional Office
Betsy Gerwig, DSWC
NPArIffiCarolina
tura!!g
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]Q3-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affimmfive Action Employer— 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 31, 2001
Dwight Mayo
M&MFarms
3352 Hwy 70 East
Smithfield, NC 27577
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510129
M & M Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Dwight Mayo:
In accordance with your application received on July 6, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Dwight Mayo, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the M & M Farms, located in Johnston County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 3360 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). This permit shall be valid only after the attached
Certification Form is completed (first page and highlighted sections) and submitted to the Division of
Water Quality.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/] 0% post -consumer paper
1

., l � .. �.. ' � . ► '� ,.•fit' � ..
Certificate of Coverage AW$,5101'jo
M & M Farms
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
cRaleigh-Regional--Office;-Water-Quality-Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
•�J

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
DWIGHT MAYO
P.O.BOX 481
PINE LEVEL NC 27568
1-919-965-9795
New Feeder to Finish Swine
3360.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be -used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops.
in the fields where the waste is to be applied. —
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycld. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer''value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when=it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to .planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving.waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H..0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3360 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 6384 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3360 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 7728 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page; 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3.96 891
8222
1-2
GeB
T. 5
225
0
I
IMAR. SEP.
8222 -1-2
1198
�SG
11
150
10
13.96
,SEP.APR.
8222
3-5
BC
4.5
0
26.69 6005.25
jGeB
I
1225
JMAR.SEP.
8222
--3-5
SG
1
0
6 9 1334.5
I
150
126. .
(SEP.APR.
END
.
..
I
TOTAL18428.75
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
0
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass)., forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four --
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is -late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BC
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
30.65
8428.75
0
0
30.65
8428.75
* BALANCE--
-700.75
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
see attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at -agronomic -rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require -precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients -or other elements. Your production facility will produce.
approximately 1243.2 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6216
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 20.72 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of•.125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 49.728 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates. -of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
if surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
lApplication RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
` Field Soil Type
! I
I Crop
I (in/hr)
I (inches)
8222 l
1-2 I GeB
I
I
I BC
l .35
l *.50
'8222 13-5
f !
I GeB
!
I
I
I BC
I .35
l *.50
8222 I
-1-2 l
I SG
l .35
I *.50
I
8222 l
I
-3-5 l
!
I
l SG
I
I .35
i
l *.50
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Pacxe : 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
She. irr�` A f/are ��i4e� ,- ��%�� 7 �eT/�viJ� IV"
7`"�✓+r-e
113 404) nie, n /w e. e- o r a2
tvi �r i-c! CY4 rr Al
6AsC�� a - sV/� a 7� , � �
//7161'
o on c.� �oyh ���✓
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. 7f the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop -is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these -soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than-30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 -.Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than-100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of.
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach. other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall..not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste, treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining -
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these,
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records, shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste, application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:DWIGHT MAYO FARMS
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste -utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a.storm.event less.severe than the 25-year, 24--hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and..at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: DWIGHT MAYO
(Please print) [
Signature:' Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chri9 W. Smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: , Date: Gb-2
Page: 12

State of North Carolina
Departni�nt of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORMMAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS A1V ORIGINAL)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Liquid Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) certification form, Part II, must be included with this application prior
to the application being accepted as complete.
Application Date:_ Zlcwe 3O, F99
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1-1 Facility name: _ f)'] _ t pM IC-.-Arrn S
1.2 Print Land Ownt
1.3 Mailing address:
City: State: Zip:
Telephone Number;(
1.4 County where farm is located: t+
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a cop,
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): LC i_ s 71evc►p1 .1 1,
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if Brent from Land Owner): _
1.7 Lessee's Integrator's name if applicable; please circle which type is listed): _ C qro 4,, �iprrnY-
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.(this will be assigned by DWQ): (county number); {facility number).
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
SiJiild j� ulC Ir atLillL:i riurijli'.r iGr VJhic" &c wszte management structures designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish O
0 Farrow to Wean sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Turkey
No. of Animals:
lel
FORM: AWO-G-N 2/5/98
Pabe 1 of 5
r-A

t
s
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): S ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 2 ./Q
2.4 Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: d Cubic Feet (ft3); Required Capacity: (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: (0); Required Capacity: (ft3)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the proposed application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the proposed lagoon(s)? YES or O lease circle one)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
A licants
Pie--.--- �_.__ ._._� �_ �.---- -- --- - __ -- - - _ _ _ .-._ _ -- — rttil a -- -
'e jeJ 3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations; �,
V/3"2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
*' field locations where animal waste is disposed;
51� ✓3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
imal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent.
.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required.
t' /A, 3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed'swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm
Siting Act including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map
shall not exceed 1 inch = 400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the
proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools, hospitals,
churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national parks, state parks, historic properties, or child
care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500 feet, water supply wells within 500
feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries, and perennial streams or
rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
NJAI } 3.4 A wetlands determination.
✓ 3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility Iocation showing features that affect
facility design, the dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities, the fields used for waste
application, and areas where surface runoff is to be controlled.
►.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required.
3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen
(PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
�3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
1.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
`'K3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
33.16 Emergency Action Plan.
" 13.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
+' .3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted.
✓3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction or
Expansion of Swine Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, please include the additional
components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-N 2/5/98 Page 2 of 5

i
4. Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the, appropriate DWQ regional
office and included as a part of the project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward)
in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional
office. Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1
thrbugh 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 5 of 5). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
--.-reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the completeapplication form and submit.the
application package.
4.1 Farm Name:
4.2 Nar.;e L complete 3ddrrss o`enginec^.qg fug cr tech_-rical spec',al,,st: AIX eS 5 -5•
Telephone number:
4.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters:
4.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management systeniju1
4.5 Map name and date: o D�cri
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
waters)
©Lt
m
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date:
(All attachments must be signed)
FORM: AWO-G-N 2/5/98 Page 3 of 5

15. PPLI
,
this app scat or
1.1) has been revie
application are not
S
me and is accurate and cor?rplete to the best of my kn
ted and that if all required supporting information and
o
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
(Facility name listed in question
wledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
attachments are not included, this application
Date
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner) .
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question
1.1) has been reviewed y me an is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. un erstand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed.and.that if all required supporting information. and attachments.are not.included,_this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COh-IPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING PIFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FOELM: AWO-G-N 215198 Page 4 of 5

r
P. 7
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1/98)
AsheviIIe Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Wooditn Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
--Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clav
. Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
Bladen Richmond
Cumberland Robeson
Harnett Sampson
Hoke Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe Stokes
Caswell Surry
Davidson Watausa
Davie Wilkes
Forsyth Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943
Washington Square Mall
Washington,
NC 27989
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort
Jones
Bertie -
-- Lenoir — ----
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans-
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander Lincoln
Cabarrus Mecklenburg
Catawba Rowan
Cleveland Stanly
Gaston Union
Iredell
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fix [phone]
Chatham Nash
Durham --- Northampton
Edgecombe Orange
Franklin Person
Granville Vance
Halifax Wake
Johnston ' Warren
Lee Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive. Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
FORtiI: AWO-G-N 215i98
Page 5 of 5

N
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: DWIGHT MAYO
Location: P.O.BOX 481
PINE LEVEL NC 27568
Telephone: [phone] RECEIVED
WATER QUAUTY gECTION
Type Operation: New Feeder to Finish Swine JUL 0
-Number-of--Animals: --..3360.00 -hogs._--
(Design capacity) N"DISIharge Permit4ing
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
I. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when tit is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

AN;MAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
- - - ----This-plan --is --based - on -the .-waste application,-method--.shown.-above.
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3360 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hags/year = 6384 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3360 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 7728 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIJIAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH.
-
- N.-
- -- -- TIME''
3.96 891-
8222
1-2
GeB
BC
4.5
225
0
I
MAE.5EY.
8222 I--1-2
JSEP.APR.
�SG J I1 150 10 13.96 1198
8222 3-5
BC 4.5
jGeB
1225 jO 126.6916005.25
I
JMAR.SEP.
8222 -3-5
SG 1 0
150 126.6911334.5
T
JSEP.APR.
1 IEND 1
TOTAL18428.75
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3
/A

. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must.be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
- -
PER AC
AC -
- - -
"USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4
\I

i ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BC
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
30.65
8428.75
0
0
30.65
8428.75
* BALANCE
-700.75
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

t ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the.
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1243.2 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6216
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 20.72 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 49.728 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
6
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
(-Field ( Soil Type
Crop
l (in%hr)
l (inches)
8222 l
1-2 l GeB
l BC
.35
i *.50
1
8222 l
I
3-5 GeB
I BC
l .35
l *.50
I
8222 l
I
--1-2 l
I
l SG
I
.35
I
*.50
8222 l
--3-5 l
I SG
l .35
l *.50
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE/ OF OPERATION /
-� /9,e
Page: e

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide-a'copy-of an -agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhabit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these' soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the -following: -The' -outer perimeter of the - land -area'
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach: other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11
�I

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ,
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:DWIGHT MAYO FARMS
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will Iollow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surfaee waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24--hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: DWIGHT MAYO
(Please print)
signature: Date: �—
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989r5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: / �i� Date:
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
i
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 14

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization -- Third Party _Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste"
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver: Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Koliflyw4nrola
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 15

w; 4F.�-::'�' ,:.•.:-•F4t;�'+�rr .k.`,T�.'•Fa .+ i s1L`hl�„F•,r:^ ---�. ... -
y y ;
/���! -+fix?alt �� � ! a.� ••.y y_ ; i 'r 4
�• , ,��#,�,,�lf'a_,r ayr�.�t� st � [ i A,.nn, 't •s� t �..rr �� ,:.'J tia - .—,w_�.. ...—.
V» ".+t ~:k' "RT�•er.y y1,a �+'s� { r � .� + �r �. ra r ; /J"r^r', a
fi:. v ter•. s'� n. �ik t ��k�.:'-.1''.+.. :::r'�s'•:. '-[,:j "', rr-_• e- n., ti. ^.x'`
�� f r '�' ' " • .-• ..r .. _ r•"%✓ t.0 ` �.. � f +r�""J�f'al�l��•�{� f �• f _ "!' ti '14 � �,r.
Y�}j+y S4�_f�%' 1 r�. •4k �'' ` � " � �'r �• / r�'[ Z r *�' �! *z i•'SS 1ta b tr-� 'i.L � -,� r i
�r :� , t'! f/ � � ram, "ice-y,1ti�a ram- r - , ,y- •r s,� ti.
i r y �-�• - y!� � 7 r .r f� ` •'aT�'+^�s �y�» �a ,� In �yti'+;� �� �1'
1 :J •� t• fry( :'?t F, ,'t" 'tIi'ti' rL Y �. ..✓t �w•'r' ".r. i'�•�y +�\+� V�•t%�'`Fw�•r;
r S •�v,• • ,t�+ M`` .,.t +x yl J'.1:a i 1 � y Y,�.a. t: ,,;:r, x',�>lM AaAi�t� ar-' T y •'. E ,-,r` ~Flb rlVAN'.
�'Vs�eC. 1r � � Y�r r f-�..�_� �..�-..w•-•� :�� i' *j' •+'i, r'{,:" t''1'=3 �C'T� - J!, i �',
pr
�i!' _ f � � r �.,�^,�.. 1 �'i"FJ•� , �_} ,'�i:U;{Vf � •' ��.;�, 3'1.�:;�+.;YS{�• ;�`!�w. a ���
n f✓ y f�'.+J '�j�Y - �.��'�-;r"'i•�t rr}k �1.•r�4} rfEl4
„ �, • pm
i•
r01�';
• J .� - 4' � �• ..,. � +. ' y,.y--4�,_•;;���.����.y�_ .��-}�:�,f�:,,'�4i'� ut1_yP:%"-ir:'I/����ty'�.''
• _' ��tir`s".� _" � , � - r ! i ��r�u � � ` �'ti'Kf'�. s I° U't t �•fip y''��'"t• �tYi'u� iwT' 1�
f, . at-+L_.i. Y J - ., j � •. "'�+ �aRF,g't'C�� •��,� jj :i•+v - : �'Y r E; S••
_ ,_r ! � , ^- - _ _� _ _.. •_may'+�, � - �;� s'� r' :r
r
- + r • ! ., � r + , �4'��-,��.} �£ •y �yj/ `�s�. � r ' : � y��s.. � •A,• t ' � �Si p � .Y
p. l� p,.� .••ram �� ,�` ..� �•4 yaf a.i�••"l :��
;a h.t f `xaT•�
r
i ,.. r. ,., I c ' �.' xti�r �`*"" / I �� j � �.r!„��. •gin` �+ :.c cal•.3'11 � ��.-"•�
r �3y� t . c . !' i" r• r c.
�� ? Ai I 1. {ti hr. �• .�s .S �i.•.-r•� �.� i�' - +w'` -+i •4K'•
49
3 , . F y�

UNITED STATES
-
DEPARTMENT OF CONS_R`, A F I O_,i
AGRICULTURE SERVICE
HASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME_ 1,1 aJ1_ _ �r---------
LOCATION-51 1W _
------------------
-SIZE OPERATIONI'Z�-=�D
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE pROM NEAREST RESIDENC�F NOT OWID by y�s�f:-� 7rn�c
PRODUCER YES* -FT . A „ /Yo+sc To 17 - - �r ace osl'-�n f
11 J as re 700,C c /
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES----- NO ----
If yes, SCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SIT£ AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" ,`
PERENNIAL STREW YES- `--- NO ----
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION
OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES----- NO -
I: yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board
about required permits. Permits nust be obtained prior
to design approval.
Are utilities in construction area? NO -=--
I_` yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual
and follow policy. -
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be
attached to site evaluation.)
Page 1
9

WETLANDS
NILL SITE iNVOLVS CL2 0000LA.ND OR A.
.:°ON -CROPLAND? YES----- tiC, If yes, yes, Producer must complete a Form AD-1026.
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWA MPBUSTING? ---
ES- NCi-
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILIT`_' OF Tnl- 1
PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF
ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BI
! ALTERED UNTIL PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC .DIVISION OF ENVIRON!•:F::'( 4
MAN AC EM ENT .
1I (A copy of AD-1026 and CPA-026 should be attached to
site evaluation.)
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT /
PRESENT? YES---- No —
IS A DEAGNA.TED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE
I PLANNING AREA OR WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN
i ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA? YES---- NO-
! IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN TH—
PLANNED AREA? YES---- NO----
ARE 'THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPO13.TANT
FARMLANDS IN THE OPERATING UNIT? YES-t-��-- NO---
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES---- NO -
If yes to any of these questions, refer to form NC-CPA
for policy sources. The form does not need to be
completed.
ODOR CONTROL
I EAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCE2✓.......
........PREDCMINA.NT WIND DIRECTION?
YES----
NO ----
........POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF TREATMENT
VOLUME FROM 1 CU.FT. UPWARDS TO
/
3 CU. FT./LB. OF ANIMAL?
YES-2 -
NO---
........PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH
WATER TO AT LEAST 1/2 OF THE
CAPACITY?
YES-tf�
NO—
........ USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE?
YES-t
NO ---
Page 2

WASTE 1 A?vAGEMENT -/
DOES PRODUCER CNN ENOUGH _AND :O _ = - - - ✓ _
-PPE_ WASTE? C.-- -
IF NO, DOES 'PRO DUCER HAVE ACCESS
MORE LAND? --`-- - O--
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER,
CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? YES----
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation-)
SOIL
INVESTIGATION --- VALID
ONLY IF
SOIL INVESTIGAT ON
SHEET
ATTACKED
Ogg C W
IS SOIL
SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
------
IS A
CLAY LINER REQUIRED?
YES-- ✓ -- IO------
I?
YES, Ia CLAY AVAILABLE
ONSITE?
YES------ No-------
f
QUESTIONABLE—--_--
! IS A
CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES------ NO--`-1--
(Attach
soil investigation
sheet
to site evaluation.)
a f -5c; I,
r
SITE
APPROVED YES-----
NO------
/
CONDITIONAL--------
1
COS•MENTS- 0N GLrZ Weer! __[7LS�ISe-_SpL1_ i� fIPSrA QLL}rs_r? 4E,J_E,
€
f4kyj -�DK 71141111 ny job" f
✓�J`��__�J�t sn" - nr-lb-f-A
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IVA�i..ID AS LONG AS THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF LAGOON CONTINUES IN MSOR'L-ELE T'M- PERIOD. UNDUE DELAYS OR HESITANCY IN CONSTRUCTIONi.L=;Y
REQUIRE THAT SITE EV,LUATIO BE VALIDATED.
? u mac/
SIGNATURE-- - ' CU, �-�j'---- DATE % �1--�-�' -_
Page
I,
0 Lee pal)

buipl
Feaa
Luao
rig �
1 , — o °
�� �►� -- o
WIPULI x
1/�
•n�tv�
fiOEd r_1:�1'`.
iYi9�,`•
�' �� i ,
7
tr
4V1.
/�� ^1
•�`
�\
` ��~.Y
-. Imo_... _ c
l
•� ,. �, \�
•
.� f�! .r �
� t, .;rat ��
.� ,w� � �
N_`,�
di 9FSd 5
t °
Ire
�; Ji... � : "`
� � Y-� �
-.�� ��f ✓•�' -� y�S- re�'t
�� `�F xlx tip' 1
S
� f -'
�, �/ � f��Yv
.'�
t�j
:. . � �y 3 , 'a•'
;�p �
� �* 9
+_
Fv d
yI 5as
w
s9Y , � - •
r
�.
n
., -+4.4• �S
is4 ���3'� t i7-
�*•�• 6„�'. t�'tiyF"� �,,.
�. t �7�Sf"Y' �
+: �,'.
.Mn
s. �'. ,�
!,. x• e
.'` b � ")l� -
S lyry 1 573R. 1
�,•. iA w 0
-'ECG:. �..
L i., �Y� a r
� l Y,R'+u y`
a'tR .h.. �.'!
�7'(
2., SE" v"55�� � ` �
_. tLx,. ��v%�I'� ✓L •
^Yy f`� % �a' o
�•
�Y' �
-
e
1-.� ;�1! - +.� L . 1 �
-i4f ;,a. �. �,b•��.
�' T� i '. �� b
_. "" fi��� }.
I :'µ# ' •C /
3- a �= W
�W�q �9
Y .. '`{yS.
� �' Y ) . •1'i'".. �
- J
I��.
f' �, ��.q t'''4>�'fi t�.�� F q
d.
�.
.,.
�
q �'
�
`� ' � � ',��+Srn T �'
�5.
�
4 � Z �
+
t S. xL` ick
vrc -
r
E'j 1,
rah' ,.1. Yam ]i W Fh •y .
._ z f`�iR: �,
`R�'�5i�]'•���a��
�v
2`AK
�pr' 15A+�tN �t-
f�'� �P"„pY d.. .�wy =
fib' ° ! � \. c
_ � -f•sy �,t 6`t�j�
'iv4 �,_ :
y yi,' n t✓ K'H .f•.. �.' :SL!
.�Y` �.1.7
. � � ~ % 3'T•,.-
£ '
,�F Y { �t 1 i.
xT
Zx' L, �
- �`' ie �i •» �•d' iL
4 { C h4AG"'x
i •tl� F �� '�4ri .<� #a�
W `. 7 - ''M15
Tom.
'.����
k•� O �" •A }
� v J. 'Y �?� � F� ri
'tw. T�ely � 'P+` r q+.l
,�'. � 5ye A.' �SE •��"
/, .L. x� FJ W
�� �
it .�` Tc� N
x-'�i"' �aFl �i .,n h ���
J.
lot I

LAGOON DESIGN CHECK LIST
1. Copy of 026 and supporting maps included..if clearing involved.
(including access roads and waste application system sites)
Dam
Safety .Exclusion
a.
Dike.'not over 15 feet high to down stream slope and not over
10 acre feet storage to top of dike.,
3.
Storage
Volumes
ai
deszgned..volume exceeds needs
b,!
all temporary storage is.designed above the seasonable high
water ,table.
cf'
minimum of 6 feet treatment volume depth available
d J
no sludge storage statement included if landowner so requests
4-�/
Operation
& Maintenance Plan (sheet included)
a`//
begin and end pump -out elevations shown
115
Location
Sketch (included)
a:
distance and direction to nearest residence shown
b�
c:1
road numbers shown
north arrow shown c
'Ken 6.
Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34 included)
N�`dJ
a
distance to nearest stream in event of dike failure shown
. 6;p
b':,
distance to nearest public road in event of failure shown
cl'
topo map of area to support a & b above included
7.
Waste Utilization Plan (included)\
aZ all tracts, field numbers, field acreage, (available acres
excluding buffers for ditches/ roads, homes, property line,
etc.) crops shown
�
/V��s Sf�Ma7,VA
preparing plan
es of dsigned bro
ragreement
C.
pumping yadjoining showing tract
g
numbers, field numbers, acres, etc. if needed
_d.
legible ASCS maps of effluent disposal fields included
e.
legible soil survey sheets showing all effluent disposal
f.
fields included
suitability of soils for crops planned assured
✓g.
attachment "B" on sampling procedure included
8': Soil investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG-538 included)
az minimum of three borings on Class IV & V lagoons
b':r� borings 2.0' below designed bottom of lagoon
c:�Z location & elevation of borings in relation to grid survey
d:',, seasonal high water table at highest elevation
e: borrow area location shown

9:1// seeding specifications included (lagoon dike and other exposed
areas around buildings)
10. Construction Specifications. (sheet included)
a`_---, need for cut-off trench addressed
b� need for sealing or lining with impervious material addressed
and- anticipated locations of such areas identified
Add'��ss c. protection of liner during -initial filling and near flush
pipes addressed
11. Grid Sheet (original or ledgable copy)
.__..-.__---------�___—_ - . - .- - -
a. gridded area large enough to include embankment slopes and
surface water diversions
b:' location & dimensions of lagoon & buildings shown (lagoon
inside top measurements shown and lagoon corners identified
by grid stations)
c:"_ surface water removal (pipes, outlets, etc) shown
de" soil borings location shown
e✓ TSM location & elevation shown
NZAf.✓ existing utilities located (if applicable)
12�Typical cross-section included
a✓ dike elevation &.top width shown
b:� lagoon bottom elevation shown
cr✓ side slopes shown
d ✓ effluent outlet pipe invert elevation shown
e:� building pads - elevation & grade shown
NA f,"' cut-off trench shown - if required
g. liner shown - if required
13:- Volume Computations
-tea.
excavation
`1b.
dike fill
✓c.
pad fill
i
'. 14.✓Summary Sheet
-a'.
design requirements
excavation volume
"C.
fill volumes
-d.
cut -fill ratio
Le,
job class
15. Location of subsurface drainage (if present)`
16. Presence of utilities addressed
rv/A 17. Observation of cultural resources statement included
/f,/A 18. Operation is outside of jurisdictional limits of municipalities

► Dam S f le~ cusi o►i es s
74f) �Q/ - p�slyrJ _!!a/ume.N.r�a/`�Glc ul `%3800
14_XCG0 �loi VL5)umC �9 Obh ���O�/ �G. C6�. �GiCJ 63 -4
7-
1T _� y
7t'
79� l�cif �i��CLiiO
rox;,- ,e� /L 7 � C. 74eiU1 C-4- C%� - C��- ir�d /1".7/�i�5<.'veQ/r!t'i' �h/4e /�' L/!Y�( I
�� CGrS 7b �C cL Q� o ,�4rrD� C! ploet /Jo r%�f7 5. c` 2 o 7L
add C ! / ! /� 7 �t. s �'� G d r C �/ /J9 a /C°/'/ c� ! ! 5 p f ecleCl-

Jr 1-,,COON SUT-,'{KY SIILt-'1' 6 T7f' IC;- r- 01OSS-StMON
V'
Sl':ttl d top of 1�2•a /
-rap Widtll
�O
- Ca,,trLcct
top of t7z,ii,
Fill Yarda(;e: ee lq�ltiehme,
L9z,-
3 3
z
Natt_tral gr(l�tr)ci rrlcv.
-------------"N ..---------------- -------------------
-
Start land �,p(�lication� stop land aTalic.stion
�
-�nl��rary Vluu,c'_
------------ - ---------I ----------
E+r_nt .��CV. 38.zD po'� t xnYo-1�
Support— T'rcatmenc Voluma
�3 Top of SlLkdgQ c_ I ev. /V
--------------------------------- .3
Dzsotto�n el�v..��.g�
Lardo,�n T
1�E�CN I MA�Kd 1)1-:) r F, I o
GENERAL I r4 0E:(•I ;T I C3N
JOE+ CLASS: _
HAZARD CLASS:---A-
Wiclth A 14-S G,-t.Yds�. t::ctv,;tc'CSSB gC.�IlJcnf
c�sC p Swe-et %tc.,, We
i
CIC-"44ti0CL:n-IS-'O.Dn / I�
ANIMAL 'TYPE S NUMEEF' Sw,hf 336C
KIND OF OPERATION:�� '
NOTE: If constructic]r r
StzArtod within jng SQar,
?L.Nri i7 not valid unC.iI re-
v c,ti()�
hs,=nrd.,i` rr,L%dce- -
P
LAGOON FOR AN I NAL WASTC '
(SINGLE STAGC)
t�} COUNTY
/Ire/c+' ca,-of1}� 5lFiT
U. S. DEFARTNENT OF GRICULTURE
SOIL CON SLRVATION SE RV I CL.
1)ES I GNEO E+'(: w
TITLC:
_ 1

..,. Jr-r^KIMtI"1 Ur AURICULTURE
Rer. 5-70 ..�. r...,� !� r SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE.
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS ..
.�
CROPLAND-ACRESRES
WOODLAND -ACRES . vf
SKETCH OF f • • i POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MA.DELocate reference Point in center fine of dam and Id4entWy o4 ske(M.
■eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
!"
■
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel�ee�e■
!e
eeeeeee■
■eeeeeeeNeeeeeee�leeC�e
eee
®eeeeeee®®®eeeee®!i®
OEM
e
10
RONee
eeeeeNONE
eee
eeeeXE�.
e'
,ee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
reeeeeee■®eeeeeeeeeee®eeeee
I■
■eee��eeCee��
•
•
��®eeeeeee
eeeee
eeee®eeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeee
eee®eeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeDleeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeer��eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeee®eeeeeeeeee®eeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee®eee
eeeee
eee®eeeeeeee
eeeeeee
ME
NNESEEMENEEN
SEENEMEMEME
BORING NUMBER AND..
Make
wag
arj
ow &mlrr
(Continu
©�
a©
�Mrm
e;e1e1�1�1�1��11e01m1®
e�®ee�+���'elee'e�1e��i©leef�i®jef
�e'
�ef�1
�e��leele
r�i�ii�e�eelele!elefef�leEefe��!�
Ike®;e;�I��!��f
eeelef
of
ee�e,���l�ele;elee
Oeeeei;ele�eleee'elefeeleeleleele.e►f�l�e
e`eelelele�ei
leleefe�e4e1s'eelelee
eeleefeel
e�leleefe(e[ee�ee{elee
�e
eOWN
a
=N
wmml
eeeeeee
del
lelMENIeeee!e
[e
e�
eeeeeeee
"
1
13ORLNGS MADE BY SIGNATURE & TITLE
2 6. 5s NG-

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUKTERED IN 13ORINGS
(Use one of systems below) .
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW-Well graded gravels; grave 4.sand mix
g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s - sand '
GM -Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs-very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl-sandy loam
SW -.Well graded:sands;-sand_-grdvel mix .; -
fsI-fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly sands .. - -
1- loam
.graded
SH-Silty sand
gl-gravelly loam,
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si - silt
HL-Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sil- silt loam
CL- Clays of low to medium plasticity -
cl - clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl-silty clay loam _
MH -Elastic silts
scl - sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic-si'Ity clay -
OH -Organic clays. medium to Mgh plasticity_
c -clay.-_ _ �__ W�_-- -•- — -- — --
L Suitable material for embankmeut is available OYea Q No (1-dreafi urA— Jowl-d an (h. sketch ow
romrse ddr)
REMARKS: ,
� / I
2 Erplaia hazards requiring apecial attention in design (S-marr. =rina..mck ia+J
.,' � �:.t•i J<l �i' �:may' � A" .:.'! ..fi``G✓C�..: �;-�J f= = � r :rr'� ie'7'
_,' ,
1;'I;:� � f� f' C //: �r/'� �, �/ C{ >^:(✓f.:G7.�ir�-..:.! //�`•i� �...i! /J�
rr !�'
•. /S�Y.i"'f�'l 4
i`11 :1;'-I'�.: T'r':�'7—
rr.. r� &C it
•
GENERAL REMARKS: Fr
n
24
25.
261,271281291301131113211331134
35
36
37
38
'39
40
41
42
43
44
45
146
1 47
48
49 JI
60
1611
1
I
i
R
I
au
i
1
-II
I

�. a. utVAKI LIXI car AGRICULTURE
Rev. 5•70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGA'LION JO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE.
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
CRO'PLAND-ACRE.S PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL ACRES.m
scA
SED
NG
OND
ppror.
RE
Locale rtlerence point in center fine of dam and identffm on skefck
i
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
■rrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl
■
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr'
rrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrlrrr
rrrrrr■
rrr■
■rrrllr=
rrrrrrrrINNErrr
rrrrrrr■
r■
■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
r■
.�.�
.....
�
.::�.,�.
�ar�rrrrrrrrrr
�rrrrl'ilrrrrrrr�Irrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrr
■
rrrrr
rrr
■rrrrrr
mmmmmm
rrMrrr
rrr
■rrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrr
rrrrr
summons
0
■rrrrrrrrrrrr
f
BORING. ..
Hakr and I;jt dam.jJ(e and spillwarl 6crincs first- Men ponded crea and borrow pit bartngs -separate witA Lwrfycal red line.
I!rltr�rrlrrr�lrrir�rfrlrlrlrrlrlr;r{rlrlrlr
r®!�'rrir���;r�
r�rr�rlrirfrlrlrrrlrfrlrlr
®�rrr{rrr�i
rE
I
1rlr1rfr1rl��rlrlrrlr
�rrr(rrrrlrr`rr[rfrirlr�r�rir�rlr!rfrlr
�r�1rl
�r�rfrr��ri�rr�rfr�r��r�r�■arl�■��rlr
errMIMI,
rr�rrr,rlrirr�rlslrfrrir+rlrlr
rrrrr!t{r�rr�r{rrrr{�r�rr��r;■�{rrrlrfrrlr�
r'rrrrrrrlrrrrrlrrfr�rlrrr(r'rlrlr
rrrrrrr{
rrr{rr{rlrirfr:rlr4rfrir
�r
r�rrfr�lr
�tr�rirr(rfrlr�rr(r�rfrlr
irrrr�rrrsrr�r
r�r�rlrr'rrirr
BORINGS ...- :�� vs�

TYPES OF MATERIAL SNCOU14TERED IN. BORINGS
(Use one of systems below).
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
GW - Well graded gravels; gravel,"sand mix =
GP - Poorly graded gravels
GM-Siity gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
SW -.Well graded -sends; sand-grdvei mix ::
SP -Poorly graded sands ._
SM-Silty sand
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
ML- Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
MH=Elastic silts
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
OH -Organic clays, medium to high_.plasticity . _
USDA CLASSIFICATION_—
g - gravel -..- -
s - sand '- -- -
vfs-very fine sand
sl-sandy-loam
fs1-fine sandy loam
I - loam .:.-_
gl-gravelly loam
Si- silt -
sil -silt loam
cl -clay loam
sicl"-silty clay loam
scl - sandy clay loam
sic -silty clay
c -_clay
L Suitable material for embaalanent is available OYes Q No (!nd)m1e unherM looafeQ on rh. sketch oR
rmerjw tide)
REMARKS:
2. Explain hazards requiring special atteatiou in design ($erpGpe, sari3o..root etc)
GENERAL REMARKS:
24 i
25.
26
27 2S 29 30 31
32
33
34
35
JWJJ37
381139140
41042
43
44
45
46
47
48
<9
50
51
1
LLL
i.
i

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
CLEARING:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site if needed) to be
--stripped _.of topsoil (31_'-)-and -stockpiled -for.-use -of- dike and pad
slopes (2-311). The topsoiling quantity is in excess of amounts
specified on page one (1).
CUT—OFF TRENCH:
c/o,
A c -af�fr nch hen
e pla
CONSTRUCTION:
1:her re wire
specified) shall be installed as shown in
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed
to the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in
max. of 6" lifts and not placed in standing water. Compaction
shall be performed by the construction equipment or shee s-foot
roller during placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials. Construction of
fill heights shall include ten (10) percent for settlement. To
protect a ainst see a e when areas of unsuitable material are
encountered, thev will need to be excavated a minimum of 7.6 ft.
below grade and backfilled and compacted with a SCS approved_
material i.e.-CL SC CH . Refer to the soil investigation
information in the plans for special considerations. Precautions
should be taken during construction to prevent excessive erosion
and sedimentation.
VEGETATION:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction according to seeding specifications sheet.

SHEET 1 ui.' 2-
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
--------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
-The-desiVned-temporary storage consists of 180 days-­stora-ge-for.—
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
--be-a--factor-to consider -in-an -annual •-pumping -cycle; -- but this -storage -- - -
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent -marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching..
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage -to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary st a e pump -out cf the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation s marked by permanent marker. Stop'pump-
out when the fluid level reaches elevation . This temporary
�� to age, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains cubic feet or
gallons.

• SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3.
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand:
-- -- 6: - Reuair a and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted.from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
-.- 8. - -Keep -a--minimum of -25 --feet-of-grass -vegetated -buffer -around - - -
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of -
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of'Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law..
i

PVC, SCIL 40 PIPE
MINIMUM
all
2XS Piss uR
`TREA-mb
• d
T4
31
MINiMLCM DfflmER
���
5ua2r R
W/)rEJZ PtFo P
MAXIMUM
m

SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
AREA TO BE SEEDED: _ 3 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
$ O LBS. FESCUE GRASS a 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
---(SEE -FOOTNOTE -NO: - 1 )-
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ S LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
LBS. RYE GRASS a 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO -MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
3 O b O LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
�U TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
3 D O BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOL_A BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
4

IRRIGATION CALCULATIONS
TRACT FIELD ACRES
SOIL NITRO IRRIG BUFF USE
TYPE LBS/AC GROUP RATE/HR LESS SUFFER AREAS ACRES ACRES
a
D
5588
(.D 4n 5
c on5 a
aO
/goo`
i I .DU
AAO
G rJto,,
sTovs
Cra,>< 1
,ya�ge.c
00.- ous�e , ov o
3001
s Sb
'sea
G� a�
,0 on,
oe
/
.$O
35 oa' x.25- . SD S. D o
3
0,3 0
ss�-
del)
.u7i�
�C41
yiD
6 74n i
yo
6,W
Rio
JIJI
&rotas
6•STo.+s
CCe �a
.y�
� r
5U t� 7' i
sss-8
-JedJ
6.0 Tcn,
30
675-C
ci
4.6 T!
coos �
rI/
b0
S
9.60
9/c
6.Js
6-S o+1'
C a I
rYd
sZ' eSoc' /.eL) 1760
snns, r
19i 4RQ
6•0
D u �/• j
/
.5'&.,,
yo ?
SS8-
6.0 Tcn5
,30

• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name-- �Lcl�ah� i}�i�� County:
Mail Address-: P Q, 1 I IV. C,
Type of production unit ----: SrcJrrt{ /�q�n01 3.�6D /1'Nacl
Type of waste facility ----- : n r -0keC: Ga 124h _
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the`waste reaches the designed
level , -i t -must .be land -applied _at . a specified rate to prevent .. - .
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization pion
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize -the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, .the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30'-days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
33 p X 13: A-;
anina1s x v tons waste/animal/yr= tons
/35­ total waste

Amount ar Plant Available Nit;-ocer Produces Per Year:
3360 .animals x lbs. N/anima'a./year =—�7 ? lbs./yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 1e0 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Laos. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Per Ac. Used Apply
SZZZ
irr fa
00 ar
:Tans
0201`J
'J T--
�}`
�i,
Cr ra Zr j
01�
s cn
11,
, 6 0
/D
k3
6—T—Z5`4
Crrl�
0 0 7 5
A45
. D 0
,zs
3
�, Ita
�cts�t•e
--r-as`a
`o.�
as Ix,e,
6.s7--a5Yo
s
' I
.s'7e -a7 a
9
s•
a
gi'1,,t
f7
6.10r-ash
it
T s)u►e
4.. S c
J
JJ
6.s1
0K
)
�S
A 0
CZA
l
.Z.
1 12
13 01
Grp r -,2s7o
Fteld 6 i5 ;h I`icw Crays �i' AO'k 'ble Total
1 Available Nitrogen
Surplus Or Deficit _ DeP�c'/
Narrative of Operation:
i n I`e Yirr
5deo MTlached C-�bera-Doh a yO IfIcL•,n'rertcdnce r/011
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste. �/�/�
Prepared by: (�' �, z� 9 Y
Name Title Date
Concurred in by: "t
Prad cer D to
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

w�
6 d
� � ƒ
����
��:�}
�� � �
/%� \E
;� ��
©
:
!� � �� z w
/w�/w
� : «� & �
}� d� & � � /% ' '»
\�� ���{���/2::�.
� � /\� \®{\
.\���� ,��/yam\6
��;�� :7772� §
� �� m ,
\�' 2� ��
, \' \\.\\
< A.e -
� ¥ � ±w 5 =� y
� i � 2� � \
�: \/ .� � � � (� \
a. = : S � J
�� � }� � � �` � �}:
m% �� \� ±.a» «:®�
» ���� �� q�� «
� \ . �� �
�±��� ^.
�ƒ -
�� � ��
w,>
; ��
— ;ems
�^^ ��
�® : \
»����±�

ATTACHHENT B
Agri-"Wdste
M
ana erie�nt
w: -
.
7
Biological acid Agricultural Engineering :'NoOi Fi'Caiylina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING; . ANALYSIS AND. •.CALCUII►TIOH
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION T
A. Semi-Solid-LotAfanure .
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2'lbs of`manure-from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors:.
ii. From storage '.
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under :the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. .Liquid .Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2- nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit.floor.
b. Seal upper end,of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lover end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Hake sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper-agizacor pump. or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsar.uLes from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, North Carolina State University, Paieigh. :;C.
1 of 3

ATTACEMENT S \
2 of 3
c. Aix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
i:.Collect about 3/4 pint of.recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a.nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small - bottle {1/2 pint or less) on end of 10-I5' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15, away from bank edge.
----c. _Brush -away-floating-scum -oz—debris; -_ ----------
d. Submerge bottle within 1, of.Liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5-times around
lagoon, mix,,and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D..Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect Litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface -in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers. take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c..At each location, collect litter -from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket. mix, and add
about•2-3 Ibs litter to a'nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix. add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

A� L-L lL Ll J. D
3 of 3
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice,,refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of _jsample_rxAnsfer_
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
L. AFL Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3315 Winton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
-.Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K. Ca, Mg, Na.
S, Fe, Hn. Zn, Cu, B
v. Addicional analyses performed upon request: DM, Ho. Cd, Ni, Pb
prc

T + 7f�,�
'�'4z�r{ .��\I ty�+'L� t �,t�-r�� t� ,� � ! w ii!'(''QtiY•Sfi �-'r
� �.rH'r�-il�`it 6, j a r n. 5 � 5 t•_ f �.• �. t ,_r t .. ;� r "t': r •
•.��' •,.q. ��..T� f: �., e �"� qq�,'-+4. �i -ak tr f, �'� c�`� �- �Ym �,.4 t �. �,r ��'+�-.
,� � r, ��,, � ,,., >a �' i , r �'i' � ° "� 'r q = �Y ' w a � �,`'�i + • g
'� + '��)}i`yY =��•�.rr e�•j�,. �•� L y{: S+r.YC Y '.s" t+ w � +.�iLd 'r1� Y. � ,r. y,� rite 1 Y,�'L `� �'hrr� Sy,�.r� •�Z sy �
moss y 6 ,! }
x±Er ', r 7 gx y , `•k•3. ,••Li• o-7 4�
r. 1� y +i
+l.r k�q,r i+ )rr'C..- •4"x �iZ,- r•�)r �4 rr ^V � ,a:;, �'��;;�,„, r ` f� ���/// �� r, s;.• ' i�YP � :.
' � • r .m, ,�� S � r�� r„�;r.,, r ) � r Y���i r �ail..� � �, ss
f '3• -E ..,f 1 k jar � � tra+►'/�{�i� l jd•G!'?
y„E. pw�'C ,F �� ?...Y. 1wi�hac�s•jTL, 44%
�}� �'Y �`• 7 "N Q,,,.Z, r �}t�''{{�11�'` livr.�� ,�_.yyx,! 'R, ; Sr,,. ��F;� . '{.17 f+t �r .3�•`+�� �',''� 7 � k E�,� . ,�. y Q
�d3' 1 r ;,�' �1Y iS i,+��a! 1 ��i,��i!' •, �P�,}�r.� � r'��`'�:c� �t � 4 n ��`- �^�' �$�*f: rS �7
,
•,err • ' . o ,.Y+ *<, ) 4 3 r✓ e. = "� -*� �" r+ r� �iiw�
h�',�i Y r+. y �r.'�C `+ r •,.1?' : i :,'rr l�r'7,', a ' .. �' i i' . s,• -r v - n. t
VIM
'ttCYj aFri.,
: ��1F^r � 1G. ,� �4 •,�f I.}.lA r 51 !/�, ,.,E 6� � x 5. ..'} •ll - �'. '.4.
'"�j'-1� r<� 1 q: r�,4�`}�ia � i,%t t:+" t�k' "/°x r� .f • q' i Igr . ,.'� � f 2'' >;.1 • �, r ,, � ^ �e i t
� x , t �i �' g- c4 }i'k,r�- �~ � ;•f �[ w // 'gyp' f �r ,,, � { � i•,' E �. , }i � r� 3
rc:i
� ,'��y;� '�� '4 1 'P, .j,�ry;� �4` ` r .t .� -p . �� _.a' ,�/� �1' it ^r� "•yr�. .i �
ZyrN..7.�
~ r t YAM) •� y�%:t +f�7,�P #' � ����,+t�i0 }� ��� ^ f i �r'�• !• yl�f't .i �fif '� 4 ��� ` _ �3 ��y` f., ..I
� ;
M.
+ , t
���..yT7i •Y �F)ys/RJr,"r�'1� �^rs: $: n,'I :S'�y C 5,+f+ I�• is
! ir�y �.: � {:)ir"'� +(��( r. ,L►� '�
Kit
�� '.'x r ��?� f'. I t.;�� - S�iS�.���y`�jY{6 � f'v i�� � i %�mr� ��:ri: r � S�� ~•P„''w" �• -� fr��� . tr.
��• `iS�� A �S �' µw{p+ T ..ti �'{�r;�+�r'�' I ti i I f� aa�r,�,r.� ) E 3 �a r •. • p_
y T{ ,r r �pr rL,.:' 7 !. / jtl •a f t
ekc,`°r'• + ,fir �g� ,e ,;.' � F � 4 Ru tz rl� �' �.g ' " x,�,
' ��ti^'��'r: � ��s�.�t � r�gr�wj"', �dr �7 ��� /kiw4�3+... + �"• r E�} r +�' } ! ,.
rr �' a `' +�` r• e !qs •4,i1,+..bi. �,r�z'�Ir^s1,. .{.• [Z�1,�{A�'•rJY �j•ytii ri4�, R�"+^i•Sw'.�'
toll'q r
t+.} :
, ,� / A ��,r4 C ':•j.�.� „'rA -+i� ��{!e^F,?'lr+, _ •� � �r r �[ '{� i', /ty���
�r� � f�Y• .yr ler•L'�nz7�^rs A���,��'�it-� !til •ri'tr ii rr .r r� L
iyr'� ,, A � .�i s:q�fi Y� +�. 9" M�" •r ?�; li,--a 3 C r s r. [,'�}' ..I' e �1 1r� r>t'••i"•r.'Y�
; 7tr l t ',,.� fr
t ,,fi 17�^''`,�.� .'L',3�x! S?'J; �9 �!L,q'X'a4.}'�cr4�'•.. �i �r r 5 .•} L�, �r{:a$ •§, , t,��a ail�,,r,l ' t.
)'1r.Ki�2 ,_(1) i tw � 4 4�r��• �y I I j.
�!:� ��� �,�` �r��� O'T'�"a��?s,.�•��' t; t +�t�r `•�,,, � i,� } ' '.: 'L ,s r ;•ir i` r rF��� 1' [ ��
d *.�tl+! •- �y' } )24'�' ff���.�:I��.FI,,;,�•t'r"'� ra.taS
i f.;�,Y�f °+/ •.i+�;y�,hr! `��j ,'-t?f�''���F���1r,��
r
3�'> ��''���."s1!�i._:� i. .',� rl.. �lk�i c��iT'�,��� •�l �.r'°�.'��%, L J i��
.�, t4 .f� „ fr fY �.e•'�k��.r,J {;vip! �.�•• L �•. +, rr•r__""�, !_ S '✓L• arl�`<t� f -.
"A-0
f t�����{�Cr s. �' iiR' f�� � �
''
1�'},�Y D tL/'F. �.tp4r/�'+,}j�' Lf1 1i..♦' ,�, �"r �•, i'.j '.
r•.~r�fJ.d:d' ty 'r'�4"� !. .rc i`y��i�N��/a ` � - };' • 7 _�" � .r
't• 7fi•�+r" I �'jr .F' c-.•'� ,','Y ..: �%�.�i r ti• �,W r +r�, S �` y -r ',+ 5� 7
• �I ��,^'•5 ��y r ` �, r'� �t` �r�!rry��3'i` a ,� '4 ti, `)y � �ar,'�f � �y°�i h ,i
.r�rT;{r`'��7� �,,.L r c, A�-'.�'�,p ,n/•r�- •� � '.f i�;�pj71�j' ;yti�'f t at�"�`�.�. �;.
��' �'!��' )�":r '• r, w yx`�f �!A. � r 1 r` �' r�� j:,r�. t �'e',�
14,4
_I:r
r• `+f;).aal. ' ✓C �y+,�.
�` Y��E'��rra? *Ey,vp �9 J•'� t��` rs "' '% '•' � �. f r1� 1.�1�b�kt � i;. /1�r ,(,.
t ', riErilhst�� V,q
M�):�r�'<.rx�'.'�"r4+�.

U. S. Department of Agriculture .
' Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
r Landowner '� a County a %h s �Oh _
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam /g2 Ft. Length of Flood Pool ,35'D� Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation]
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est.
Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width:
Slope: Land Use
; Improvements
Above - :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft.
%
f
Ft.
Ft.
•
1
LLJOO�ICen11
A%OMe—
�D t-
_
3
:3V00'
/ov ..3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach /VOOe- -
Hazard Classification of Dam 6) b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification I, II, III, IV, V) - /es-5
7
name
title
Concurred BY � /V � ('. c c•
name (title)
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date ld -->? 6 -EZ
Date 1,73- �&

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical assistance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person.responsible for
approving the design. Most farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies. 'This data sheet is to be used for recording
the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard classification. Where there is a possibility for loss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are made by evaluating_ the possibi.lity_.._
- for 1oss of--1 i fe and the -extent -of --damage-that wo�.il d resul t i f _the dam
should suddenly breach- that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out. It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
released equal to the height of the dam. This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it moves down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should be evaluated for a sufficient distance downstream until
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings, roads, utilities, reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess of the flood plain; however, in a narrow steep valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.

0
7CI-

r +
perator===========__________________=======>Dwight Mayo
County======================================>Johnson
Dist. nearest residence (other than owner)==> 975
Sows (farrow to finish)=====================>
Sows ( farrow to feeder) == ===================>
Head (finishing)============================> 3360
Sows (farrow to wean)=======================>
Head (wean to feeder)=================_ ====>
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu.ft.)===> 0
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft. per lb.)===> 1.0
Inside top length===========================> 350
Inside top width=====______________==______-> 256
THE FOLLOWING
COMMANDS ARE
AVAILABLE FROM
ANYWHERE IN
THE PROGRAM:
TO PRIN DESIGN:
\zz
TO CLEAR DESIGN:
\cd
Top of dike at elevation=====_==============> 42.80 TO QUIT
Freeboard===================================> 1.0
Side Slopes______________==____________=____> 3.0
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================> 6.8 TO GOTO
Bottom of lagoon at elevation===============> 31.80 \sr
Total required volume==============>
667681✓j
Total design volume available======>
693800
Design end pumping elevation=====- =========> 39.10
Min. required treatment volume=====>
453600
Trmt. vol. at end pumping avail.===>
474355
Design start pumping elev.==================> 41.20
Min. required perm. + temp. volume=>
642839
Design vol. at start pumping avail.>
643027
Seasonal high water table elevation=========> 37.70
NOTE! Verify that temporary storage is
adequate:
Min. required temporary volume=====>
214081
Design temp. vol. avail============>
219445
W/O SAVE
SEEDING:
TO PRINT SPECS:
\pc
TO PRINT 0 & M:
\po
TO GOTO WASTE U:
\wu

Operator:Dwight Mayo County: Johnson Date: 10/31/94
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 975 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 Sows
(farrow to finish) X
1417
lbs. = 0
0 Sows
(farrow to feeder) X
522
lbs. = 0
3360 Head
(finishing only) X
135
lbs. = 453600
0 Sows
(farrow to wean) X
433
lbs. = 0
0 Head
(wean to feeder) X
30
lbs. = 0
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
(SSLW) = 453600
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED
TREATMENT VOLUME OF
LAGOON
Volume
= 453600 lbs. SSLW X
Treatment
Volume CF/lb. SSLW
Treatment
Volume CF/lb. SSLW=
1.0 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume
= 453600 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
�Unc�ouJn�r
r �,rs��� -/q0
Volume
= 0 cubic feet
S/uc��-
acC&(-mCL/uyj,)„ bec -fryuvlffcl
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top: length 350 feet ; width 256 feet
Top of dike at elevation 42.80 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet Side slopes 3.0:1(inside)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 41.80 feet
Bottom of lagoon at elevation 31.80 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 37.70 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula:
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/END2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 344.0 250.0 10.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH X WIDTH
344 250
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH X WIDTH =
284 190
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH X WIDTH X 4
314 220
86000 (Area of Top)
53960 (Area of Bottom)
276320 (Area of Midsection X 4)
CU. FT. = [Area top+(4XArea Midsect ion) +Area Bottom] X Depth/6
86000 276320 53960 2
VOL. OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 693800 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
Drainage Area:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length X Width =
350 256 89600 Square Feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length X Width =
0 0 0 Square Feet
-TOTAL DA 89600 Square Fee-t—
Design temporary storage to be 180 days.
A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 453600 Lbs. SSLW X CF of waste/lb/day X 180
Volume = 111041 Cubic feet
B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems
that recirculate the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0 Gallons/day X 180 days storage/7.48
gallons per CF
Volume = 0 Cubic feet
C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by
largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 Inches X DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 52266.667 Cubic feet
D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.8 inches / 12 inches per foot X DA
Volume = 50773 Cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
111041
Cubic
feet
5B.
0
Cubic
feet
5C.
52267
Cubic
feet
5D.
50773
Cubic
feet
TOTAL 214081 Cubic feet

6. SUMMARY
Total required volume = 667681 Cubic feet
Total design volume avail.= 693800 Cubic feet
Min. reqrd. trtmnt. vol. plus sludge accum.= 453600 Cu. Ft.
At elev. 39.10 Ft; Vol= 474355 Cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm = 643027 Cu. Ft.
At elev. 41.20 Ft; Vol= 642839 Cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation is 37.70 Feet, which must
be lower than the elevation of top of treatment volume 39.10
DESIGNED BY:
OL 10 ..�
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
e-
DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ADDITIONAL NOTES:

UNITED STATES NATURAL RESOURCES 806 NORTH STREET AUG 14 1 SS
�• DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SMITHFIELD, NC 27577AfjG��^�
AGRICULTURE SERVICE TELEPHONE: [phone]
August 10, 1995
David Combs
Area Conservationist
USDA-NRCS
Federal Building, Room 108
134 North John St.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Dear David:
would like your approval to continue working with Dwight Mayo on his lagoon
and holding pond. He still plans to construct lagoon, and has had plan approved
since 1-23-95. The lagoon is located approximately 975' from the nearest residence.
There is a statement on design that plan will need to be re-evaluated if not
began with in one year.
(1� r
Chris W. Smith
SCT
cc: Dwight Mayo
8-1W-5s
�tJ�JY'114 q L
..�..�.� • ,! n � t�..11l..l..� 1 x.�sl_. ..�1'C ` Q.A-Vv -�Jr ��
Xljlt� JYU-kD L'�

UNITED STATES NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION '
►" AGRICULTURE - SERVICE
806 NORTH STREET
SMITHFI'ELD, NC 27577
TELEPHONE: 9I9-989-5381
David Combs
Area Conservationist
USDA-NRCS
Federal Building, Room 108
134 North John St.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Dear David:
August 10, 1995
would like your approval to continue working with Dwight Mayo on his lagoon
and holding pond. He still plans to construct lagoon, and has had plan approved
since 1-23-95. The lagoon is located approximately 975` from the nearest residence.
There is a statement on design that plan will need to be re-evaluated if not
began with in one year.
�t
Chris W. Smith
SCT
cc: Dwight Mayo

0
Brock Equipment rCo.`�
•
Po Box 100
BAELEY, N.C. 27807
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This irrigation system was designed for Dwight Mayo (New Farm) by Shane Ward of
Brock Equipment Co.
A scaled drawing, required calculations, and required specifications on pipe and equipment
are included.
The following buffers were maintained on this farm:
25 feet from ditch .
25 feet from property lines
75 feet from property lines with occupied dwelling
75 feet from surface water and perennial streams
100 feet from well
200 feet from residence
All comments and recommendations are appreciated.
r
Thank you,
Shane Ward
f _
Lee Brock. Technical Specialist
3-6-99

HIMISCUMMMIM
..Arm .
4V
7A
Arl tl.
..........
5,

`r I i.
,FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
The lowest maximum application rate (inches per hour) _ .30
The lowest maximum application amount (inches per irrigation cycle) _ .50
- - - ----Amount of --Nitrogen produced per year for application-7,72 g.—'"_.--
30, 6 5
*This plan wets 28.4$ acres. Mr. Mayo can overseed the bermuda or
overseed with winter rye to obtain an extra 501bs. to the acre. This added to
the original 225 Ib. per acre will total of 275 lbs.
3v, 6,-)'
-2848-
xM
--Mr. Mayo may clear some land in order to obtain more acres. If he
does, this plan will be revised to show the new wettable acres.
This information was provided by the waste utilization plan.
4

Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Travel speed = 1.75 fpm or 21 ipm
Application rate = .26 iph
Lane spacing = l85'
Wetted diameter = 250'
Gun make and size = Nelson ISO
Nozzle size = .7"
Operating pressure at gun = 50 psi
Operating pressure at reel = 60 psi
Operating pressure at pump = 74 psi - —
Aic pattern = 3301
Flow rate of sprinkler = 100 gpm
Pump power requirement (bhp) = 9
Total acres covered' (effective) = 30:65
Traveler make and model -Cadman 3250 W$
Hose length = 975'
Hose diameter (ID) = 3.25"
Speed compensation = mechanical
HydEatu.M=btr
- 1,04ho 1n11L -
- Effective VAdth-
Coyr.Lad
_
....Acres
1
745
195
3.96
2
385
190
2.31
3
445
185
2,51
4
515
185
2.81
5
395
185
4-42
6
755
185
3.82
7
765
185
3.87
8
755
185
3.82
9
575
190
3.13
Total:
30.65
F.Werior Start: .34
Stop:.29
Interior Start: .34
Stop:. 28

� r f
TRAVELING IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CALCULATIONS
VELINGJRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION RAT
I == ((96.3*q)/(3.14*(.Wr)112)r3601w
where,
I = approximate actual application rate (iph)
- q = disdharge (9Pm)
r = wetted radius (ft)
w = portion of circle receiving water (degrees)
Apolicadon _mate ff. 126 Inches per hour
TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION AMOUNT
d = (1.605•q)/(I`s)
where,
d = gross application (in)
q = sprinkler discharge (gpm)
I = travel lane spacing (ft)
s travel speed (fpm)
Total AnWication Amount = 0.60 10cch_es
VELOCITY IN A PIPELINE
v = [0.408"g]fd^2
where,
v = velocity of water (fps)
q = flowrate (gpm)
d = inside diameter of pipe (in)
V�ocltS► of Water = &S6 feet eg second
IF q = 100.00 gpm .
r = 125.00 ft
and w = 330.00 degrees
then I = 0.26 iph
IF q = 1 100.00 gpm
I = 185.00 ft
and s = 1.75 fpm
then d = 0.50 in
1F q r 100.00 gpm
and d = 4.00 in
then v = 2.55 fps
D\M ht Mayo / New Farm

r f
FRICTION LOSS:
IN SUPPL YLINE AND/OR TRA VELER NOSE
FR C 1 N LOSS IN §UPPLY LI E
FL =[(0.2083'(1001c)`1.852)"[(041.852)/(D^4.8656)]"(L1100)]*.433
where,
.FL .= friction loss in supply line (psi) _ IF_c = - 150
c = roughness coefficient Q : 100 gpm
Q = flowrate (gpm) D = 4 in
D = inside diameter of pipe or hose (in) and L = 3400 ft
L = length of supply line or hose (ft)
Fricdon� Loss in SVMIX Wne a
FRICTION. LASS IN TRAVELLER HOSE
then FL = $_61 psi
8,61 psi
(if solid set . _ . enter 0 for gpm)
FL =[(0.2083''{1001c)AI .852)1(Q^9.852)/(D"4.8656)]*(U100)1*.433
where,
FL = friction loss in traveler hose (psi) IF c = 150
c = roughness coefficient Q = 100 gpm .
Q = flowrate (gpm) D = 3.25 in
D = inside diameter of pipe or hose (in) and L = 975 ft
L = length of supply line or hose (ft)
F ctign Loss In _Traveller Hose = 6.78 psi
then FL = 6.78 psi
Dwight Ma 1 New Farm

TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD
Elevation dif. from water to CL of pump-
psi
1.732
feet
4
Elevation of nozzle-
2.165 .
5
Elevation dif. between CL of pump
and high point in field-
4.33
10
Sprinkler discharge pressure-
50
115.5
FL in pump suction assembly-
2
4.62
FL in pump discharge assembly-
2
4.62
FL in traveller hose** -
6.78
15.67
FL in supply line*" -
8.61
19.90
TDH-I 77.621 179.3
BRAKE HORSEPOWER
BHP = [Q"TDH]4[3960*Ep]
where,
SHP = power requited to drive the pump (hp)
Q = flow rate (9pm)
TDH = total head the pump operates against (ft)
Ep = pump efficiency (decimal form)
IF Q = 100 gpm
TDH = 179.31 ft
and Ep = 0.5
then BHP = 9 hp
Brake Homepawar_= 9 horsepower
Friction Losses calculated on previous page
Dwight Mayo 1 New Farm

NPSIL4 Calculations
NPSHA = Pa-Hs-Hf Pvpa
=14.3-6.33-2-.36
NPSHA = 5.61 psi or 13 feet
Where:_
Pa - Atmospheric Pressure
Hs = Suction Head
Hr = Friction Head
Pvpa = Vapor Pressure
Lane Spacing
185 is 74% of 250
250(74)=185
LS =185'

• . irrigation System Operation
Traveler
Start-up:
1. Tow machine to field.
2. Connect supply hose to field hydrant and traveler.
3. Open hydrant.
4. Start pump and run at idle until water is coming out of gun.
5. Slowly-ir►crease throttle -to the desired pre�ssfire.-
6. Start traveler engine, engage reel, and set at the desired speed.
Shut -down:
1. Slowly decrease throttle on pump and shut off
2. Shut off engine on reel.
3. Shut hydrant off.
4. Disconnect supply hose.
Winterization-
1. Remove suction assembly.
2. Remove discharge hose and supply Dose.
3. Remove drain plug on the bottom of pump.
4. Remove cap on bottom of gun cart.
5, Blow reel out with air compressor.
6. Check antifreeze in engine.

vp 00
jn
ko
rAd'
�14
_41
-1 - Now -An vy WON 1
Low A 7 4f AW A
Soto
IA A 2, Q .......
A tj
I A 1_0
To movy-An -0
an
Zoo
4
Wks
A
:-,M

BIG GUN° PERFORMANCE FABLES U.S. UNIT
100 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 240 TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
PS
Nozzle
'S'
GPM DIA_
Nozzle
'55"
GPM DIA.
NOtzle
6
GPM DIA
NOrr1a
65"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.7"
GPM DIA.
N�zzla
75'
GPM DIA.
Nuzzle
6'
GP7,1 DiA
Nu:du i Nuzzle
85" .9'
GPM DIA. GPM DIA
Nozzle
Ip'
GPM OIA
50
50 205
6a 215'
74 225'
67 235'
111 245'
115 256•
130 265'
150 273'
165 280•
204 300'
aw
70
60 225'
75 238'
66 250'
103 263'
120 275'
136 283'
155 295'
177 302,
197 310,
243 338'
s'i 11815.`f1�
'
7 .
loditl4tilit9Aatmw"
w'-aa-
68 245'
63 258'
100 270'
117 263'
135 295'
155 306'
t75 315,
201 326'
23 335'
274 362''
'!:,It1�_
;•247
76 265'
91 278'
111 290'
129 303'
150 315
nl 32a'
195 335'
1 222 344-
355'
304 350'__
Ardn4ple my Wnn rtuu a zbm lou.
100 R RING NOZZLES
100 ON DIFFUSER NOZZLES
P51
.71 RING
GPM DIA
.77 RING
GPM DIA
.81 RING
GPM DJA
.86 RING
GPM DFA
-69 RING
GPM DIA
.93 RING
GPM DIA
.96 RING
GPM DIA
0.5 DN
GPM DIA
0.6 DN
GPM OIA
01014
GPM DIA
0 t
GPr,
.30
.. ... r
...»,1; .,,r°rk•
• '
'�::•.r w•�1=
.-t,�...,.�.
•.d,;.� r.
~±.t18
..1w::L,��,
.ti..:.l.•."r.'r. :..:'r
.irar.ain4:'..:r.
!rrt'. r6T;.y0II&A4
tihW7t4Mi'
40
66 708
78 212
91 215
103 .224 ._
235
134 238
-'"152 `242 --
- 45 154
66 168
91 182
118
50"'
- 74 f220.'':
'_BB::J28�M
.:1�10Qis?30'�:.::.w11b.P40.w
�: I�QirZEO.+:'.,f160ra66w,
7S6I*Q60ri
RwtIt1G.W66 :wliiw0l'.3i5ii�
iii1100i8!
00
of 235
96 240
110 245
125 260
141 270
164 275
183 28D
--
110 200
143
70.
88, 245
1:1006.260l:n
8N 2bQn::.'.i
6r.i75i-.
'-.Wt i. 'm i'i
. f:17�'r2b11i4,
ieiL�i0u:170f0w.�:
Ma: z�..;r-.�
'.1 '
80
94 255
111 265
127 275
145 285
163 300
109 305
211 315
-
- -
- -
-
>-90:'.
4•w:�2lsb''«'+•i
:::4rli►h316:+�'
• .76i'1Ydbidi
' b4;bR98�+<
< `�dt7alh'SfD'alw
. if20iti.Stb.a,'
:«�::'R24lIa28'hi�
l:a
`
700
105 270
124 260
142 295
762 305
102 320
212 325
236 335
- -
- -
-
-
110'
-010:';276''.:1`
ti1tyQ1::294'£ '
yYb6'1,905''
i,17G k.11b'{.:
1.1
:PlIlk l
ne ulamolor u1 ulrpw li appruximafe'y d•f0 loci fur Ine ei- IraAciury anyle. 0-,b lass for 10-,
150 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
I Nozzle
PSI I GPM DIA
Nozzle
GPM OIA
Nuzzle
GPM DIA
NU1 1I'
1 0"
GPM DIA
Nozzle N171210
III, t 2"
GYM DIA GPM DIA
Nozzle
1 1 3' 1
i GPM DIA,
.•r`!Q'1, .,.iQB,.'i.W,''.�i,.�i:'111.1iri�'.1Cif�liflV�[Ii'fiw'.]Ntk
rfIA
rDIA
5I.�e.N':rJ IU..
�e •nI `
M1o11o4:L'.1.✓cVlwly�
r��� qy�
.�[111, �'Wni FrliXi..Y'
pM a . e�i
'''!wV'-'NlO.li�.'�A611
a4
60 110 265'
143 285'
-IV 305'
225 325'
275 345,
330 365'
385 380'
..7�.:. .:'..:.12Q •':: 1."2b0'�',sirr
I
•. •t 'M.Ml41P�l.4Fi �'
'...y r�.f 07-.. w'i ...i�' i�.,.in
w:t :'14J. '.,1k �+l.h
'.Y ,r Am
--445
80 128 290'
165 310,
216 335'
260 355'
315 375'
3H0 395'
470'
90'•'-.-,••r19b:.;: i:3g0:y.":.i:
;.:i::*176Xr:4i}6'ri+:M
.:.t:d, 213.•',.-:.345:.-3::..:'•f.,Z76-.,I.�.s365'..'..:.
_',•,n.33S::.4'.,..+a
w::.-.AOfZ.��.rAdO%iallliv
1G0 143 310'
185 330'
235 355'
290 375'
355 400'
425 420'
500 440' I
110 160 '.. r1�0'.ti.t4.
: e1G�•'�' ii..bW .r
.•IrYRZ47'a.:s 13b8.::•
..:.305.;': J.{:a98'.;.:ir
wr...:3x0,te :; 4�4 v h�
.r.:l4.'. • y430 :ei'
'+1.+aar.wt`"iw i�a
j 120 157 330'
204 350•
258 375'
320 395'
385 420'
465 440'
Say 460'
150 R RING NOZZLES
H,nq R'ng
66' 97'
Hlny
1 06"
fi,ny
I I rl"
Final
1 26'
Hutt'
1 14 '
Rmg
1 41
F'$ I GPM DIA I GPM DIA
GPtd DIA
GPM f71A
GPM
OIA
GPM DIA
.
50' ..100"":,.;VAS•:.i.r.
r'r+1�•4I''•r.2G6.Jwri4
a..;14f684:>..42811'ri
'e+rt�r20G*4r!800:aXw
'4ryp2i -Ako
l.k300r.1'.
225 31!,'
'4wii3346w-`�`.iirt
275 335' s
,
3:10 350r
`
60 1l0 260'
70 27D:ti1`. y{,;>.i'.Sfibtii3'.'•3>i0':'l±
1.13 260'
182 300'
, .
�•r:.+:fBhirW>b710Wanr
15 365'
80 �M t18 260'
11's
1 210 320'
260 340'
445 395'
315 3601.
3ti0, 3110'
�.,.'DO.. , '.135..'r.i>':290''.Li#
.l;'0'
�-':�a4"{73.sSi....3tu�.,asw..irti1r.'n2f0'#l:,Fl
c�'87srC4'h�i35074,ti"a�+iffi'w335,:.*.�aT.��Qlirii9h
. , .'
1c0 143 3004
k 110••1 ,:.,.150 .'.310".1.'
185 3''0
�es:::1B6:Lr,�wr�JO`..i•k+.
235 340,
--4 247-:: �364'iY:ti
390 360'
.h:�+•-306.+,1.4370',.1r:.�
355 360,
r•..37R't.il'.J80:,ern.a,::.::MG.-..,:410'....,-t:.hitS?Si
425 400,
500 415'
120 I 157 3s5'
f 204 335'
7S8 3fi0'
320 360'
;4N5 400', ..
4f,5 420. .,
.. Sa5 435'
i/'U UI.l111y1 N' pl Ihfnw i5 JGO'uXlm 4l trly 3'S� IU15 tu' tltl, 21•• If.11u':Infy :'nyl,:
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 270 TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
Nozzle
1 05'
PSI I GPM DIA I
Nozzle Nozzle
1 t" 12"
GPtt DIA f GPM DIA
Nuzzle
1 3"
GPM DIA
Nuzzle _.._ Nozzle
1 a•' 1 1 5"
GPM DIA I '(-ow DIA
vOzrlu
1 6"
GPM DIA
`+uzrlu Norzie I
1 75' 1.9'
GPM DIA GPM DIA
80.
260' :.:.1465.
r.x286,!=4 r'
96b5,:: ri39Qr<:.376.:
w.:386'u...3o0'.r.
td1r443�
':..410:'ce�•+.161btr^iI80w;s4'ir18A6ty:J145au.'.•rd✓�iod167L1T!!
10
270 360'
. - 290 .t' 376',--:U
310 3B0' 355 395'
J1 � = kA396(Gr i ei'A S60rr:'.�i1107i di
4t5 4t0'
+i NA31 A$D' .:
aHO CIO'
At 4516 at-4w-L' r
S55 .150'
�i:500 e� 1wLIM Sa
630 a1i5'
I wi 873.'2u:485"
755 495' � 89p 5t5' '
. +ru 80Gbia154iCT.z {
l�80..
90
310 390'
1 350 410' 405 425'
475 445'
Sa5 4r,5
625 485'
715 5051
655 535' 1001 5555' 11
100'•.::'.3251=!<400":rt''•r.'370'rsC420t�SurlYy'yayAp'+.k:rrn80al:isAB011i1'
755:1.460:
rreb0ir�tCOCLf::
620a.%.I!!':.,�;AOO.:d:+S505Xi.}`�i
t10
3a0 410'
390 445 450'
525 470,
605 a95'
S95515'
I 1110 590
120
35 420
I
406-.40''
W6:*48x
tin0
lI7790
S&V'"�8i550.
F'.575' ,I41
.9a5 t565'
8;a50%;1-luma►iiii1muvi
I 130
370 4:5'
'
65'
r,55 jt5'
755 540'
60 56Q'
1210 620'
200 R RING NOZZLES
1 , Rmg
I ';' Pony
1 '•." filny
1 W' Aing I I '..' R,rn;
2" R'ng
1129" dClU all
1, 46^ dc1u311
(15n"" acl U'l
(1 nu" acw.1l
(1 74' a4tu,111 ` f11f3" 4ClUsll
Fll 93•'cwall
P51
I GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
("I'm DIA
+ GPM DJA GPr•i DIA
GPM DIA
60:.
.,230 "'+w3254#.v;
•:tJOQ,•{.iLi$��'Id:�1.
xV k.1+36G `�.':.. '
'}10Ki+c,i '�,1i�r'tL
..i.l�niiii04117-'1,40`J++a.A* •c-w,nb.7ff...XrM :..y„�MX�
60
' 250 340'
330 370'
385 390,
445 4l0'
515 4.5 585 440'
695 455' l
70 'I
.270.'' ,g56r.'+'�•�
'7:'��:'.:588ib.rlw�b6C,.yi
.;:i:a•1Mf164i1a'rlc',A06'.
4+r.tiaiffb0a'4;,A>:1i7b1�•'t.d'
.:r.:ql;lS.•lYwKil.'Lw.c�jtt-.�:830�i.ia=455�•^.'I
Zr'I75.
60
290 370'
3e0 400'
445 420'
515 4.10'
590 455' ! 6:19 470'
801
90
I' 310 380'r'>•;,j.;,;m
406v w:A131RJay.
4:.rr AiB t:Atir�35:����}
[iw548ity�i:Ab6:xM/.►t:ar
tiB2 a i470 ice:, .X1fi.s .,.4BS�.;
I
'ii i 66
100
325 390, !
425 425'
500 445' I
575 465'
660 :ho' I 755 500,
900 520'
1 a
I 340 400 • :.
:.... 446 r. r4.: 435r'. _: •
:4125'1 i ►1d�657i vy . #
• W+'r,S01+. ► r LA7b:,..
1 ': w' L.695 . 'w', i'..A90:»w� a 780. •..�. 610 r w r.
I r sl rYidL.7 61h 11
,['f1
355 a1U'
465 445
545 46b' l
t130 4A',,'
72•� 500 8:!t) 530'
985 545' I
I 130
370 415'
486, .'':- .460' :
:.:.$bb:'_:7.: 4701j. ':
z, : .855' : '}',4
:i755 : 860.. .825' . •'
102S7f '
TI:'.' C'7mely 01 th'ow'S dpr,0,mately 2Ln less fct the 24° valeelory angle. 54, Ie55 for the ?11 Irdleelpry argN1
1h« t11G GUt:' i'!I fl_II::a II _'; a.ald rl"5 ::l:k!n OrAdll Md Uldof IrIU•dl 1�111:1n1::1, �'1: J"'l f1,.'r r:,• J:I.r•I •,•:{f .010':Wd I" •,il'J i'•.JI :l, Jr,l„In 'I ,II.I II.'e L0n011""ll .]I Jlher I4�IOIS
ti,"Snfl IrI (j41•U111. Q:i.Ul4I�"n mnX,:s [t,1 i•_�-'I.l.ml ,ir:.:,..:I :')li[lili„It ,:I ��l„i;11,1r :,• �:: �Ill..i: ,.i 1.14"

s
g�
IFICATIONS
INSIDE STANDARD
DIAMETER LENGTHS
OF HOSE AVAILABLE:
2.25" -- 700'
2625 1 2.625" 900,
3000S 1 3.04" 600'
,r
7.
't' ��. • ��ri r � � rt.. •, l�b-r�r�ra. i
',
':.r hri. .v1,.:•,.r•J .� ri:at // u.t i�+Fe :''.i <<is' ll+ ��._ - -�.•.. r-
��� {��`#�.��� �,S'M. 4 `t r I p ;� -t:��rl.4,��,ii,irl 4y ,y%!.'Iiw`.j •�x:K;{t •;-t:��
�• �R+ I�Y, �,1; Yii:. {i„L�rY �+.\�i�1 y�71,ya' '/ .a7,+.•.I:1 i:��kt.r•�!rt'1; }
4'�ti��3;t�>Y•G1•'
I��r�+"}= 1i'c�'•..ki:.,�l �t:,t,i �. °-rb: a a t (t,,.�Ri�. �ili'�iE li ,iR:.'j';i�.i+s�tt"�aSl j(b!)�h�•� l:i� t3
r�'��),���.,-,��'4.i�� •5�"•'`ie;�r:�;,-. �;': �i•
_�T,•:•��.J.�`v.ti�_lf%il�,'..��� d �..,.Li_{'•>'-f.,�: ,,+tw �� 15.�,y+.�� r.C��� �, x•I.A�G'G}.;��Y• 4'�.%' �' i>>.x 1�'1�r�i„ylr `i+�'S'r { ��`SA^�.1.-!ti +�, .. � .�v 1.,I
V � ►� iL=�����E.. .�: 1 ., .. _3: �:'r.r l�41d•.•, 1.- .i .,� n.a }S'+,R�. _
4
i 9 5 2 1 9 9 81
46
Y E A R S 0 F-
E X C E L L E N C E
Cadman
POWER EQUIPMENT
A LAVIF
R A%IP
STANDARD FEATURES
• Honda 4 hp. OHV engine.'
• Single chain drive on drum using
• Slewing ring turntable.
heavy duty traction pins.
• P205/65R15 tires on 2250.
• 3' x 5' tube frame.
• 9.50L-15 tires on 2625.
• Four (4) coats of paint.
• 9.50L-15 tires on 3000S.
• Best quality 2406 medium density hose.
• 4 gallon aluminum fuel tank.
• Flip down stabilizers on 2250.
• Automatic gun cart stop.
• Gear driven telescopic stabilizers on 2625
• Dose build-up safety switch.
and 3000S.
• 3-wheeled gun cart.
• Disc brake to prevent hose recoil.
• Nelson SR-100 gun on 2250.
• Mechanical speed compensation.
• Nelson SR-100 gun on 2625.
• 2.5" x 25' feeder hose on 2250.
• Nelson SR-150 gun on 3000S.
• 4" x 25' feeder hose on 2625 and 3000S.
• Lift kit for gun cart.
• Speedometer.

2250 ". 11 .2525
"30o0S
TOP VIEW OF ■ DRIVJ
■ • •
i � � ?' �'• �.,`},�; �r „,gip �� � st,.. � .i
��.,
is E Sri
.�G�k I' ,�:?
CLUTCH
REDUCTION BOX
ALTERNATE P.T.O.
--WINDUP ---
I HANDLE l
CONTROL CABLE
1 .
SPEED
COMPENSATION BAR
Disc BRAKE ,
4 HP. HONDA EJIDINE
l PULLEY SET
CABLE DRIVEN CAM
ADJUSTMENT
HOSE.SPEED,COMPENSATION y
The Cadman MECHANICAL -CAM DRIVE HOSE
SPEED COMPENSATION SYSTEM has simplified
the task of very accurately compensating the hose
retrieve speed for the increase in drum diameter
as hose is rewound onto the drum.
Here's how it works: A sensor bar, riding against �
the hose as it winds onto the drum, operates a cam
on the variable speed drive pulley by way of a cable.
As the cam rotates, the pulley pitch is adjusted just
enough to, accurately compensate for changes in
hose speed over the entire retrieve cycle. The result
is an even application from beginning to endl
Important: The Cadman engine drive system uses
00" P.S.I. because it is self-contained and separate
from the fluid irrigated, whereas pistons, bellows,
or turbines lose 5 to 20 P.S.I. This loss has to be
overcome by a pump running harder. These other
systems usually result in using less main line or a
smaller gun nozzle in order to keep the pump
pressure within operating maximums.
THE CADMAN 2250, 2625 AND 3000S ARE USED FOR MANY DIFFERENT
WATER APPLICATIONS AS WELL AS LIQUID MANURE AND MUNICIPAL WASTE.
Model
Hose
Hose .
Input P.S.I.
Gun
Flow Rate
. Lane w ,
:. Acres •
-Time to Apply
. Time
I.D.
Length'
at Traveller
P.S.I.
GPM
Spacing
,per Pull
'I inch acre
per Pull
130 :
85
°ti. 115
' 223'.: ;
°l•:4.0 _
3.9 hr.
15.6 ter.
„7Q0'
`130 :
75 .
-130 '' y
::225'
`4.0 ' ~
: `3.5 hr.
14.0 hr..
2250
2.25"
150''
85
:140
-236' _.
: 4.3
3.3 hr. _ ^
14.2 he
• 150
75
;; .152 ...
238'
.4.3
3.0 hr. ; � .,
:-12.9 hr.,;
85'
;155
- 240'
1.2.9 hr;
16.0 hr.
'
. •_
75 :
' � : 174
240' =
5.5 ' '
2.6 hr.
14.3 hi -.
2625 ;
2.625'
900'
.130
150
85
190
.246'
5.7
2.4 hr.
13.7 hr.
`150
75.
-205
252'
•�5.7
- 2.2 hr."
12.5 hr7
130
85
285
'292'
4.9
1.6 hr. - . '.
, 7.8'hr.
3000S
3.04"
600'
130
75
320
300'
5.0
1.4 hr.
7.0 hr.
150
85
345
313'
5.3
1.3 hr.
6.9 hr.
150
75
375
317'
5.3
1.2 hr.
6.4 hr.
Cadman Power Equipment Limited, whose policy is one of continuous improvement, Cadman Power Equipment's 46 years of leadership and
reserves the right to change specifications, design or prices without incurring experience in design and manufacturing stands behind every
obligation.
Cadman Traveller produced. A complete line of pumps, pipe and
accessories are all available from one company.
uaaman
POWER EQUIPMENT
AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY AND IRRIGATION EOUIPMENT
Box 100, Courtland, Ontario, Canada NOJ 1 EO
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]

RATED BHP is the power rating for variable speed and load
applications where full power is required intermittently.
CONTINUOUS Blip is the power rating for applications
operating under a const.inE load and ;peed li)r long periods of lime.
POWER OUTPUT i; scilhin . or - 59i, at standard SAE. I 19,)5
and ISO 3046.
PE IOTOc;RAPl IS .%1:k)' Sl h)V NONST k3 DARD EQUIPMENT
DEERE
PERFORMANCE DATA. _ _.......
Rated Power
Intermittent (1) ............................... 80 hp (60 kW) @ 2500 rpm
Continuous(C) ............................... 72 lip (54 kW) @ 2500 rpm
Peak Torque
Intermittent (1)......................... 215 lb- t (292 Nm) @ 1200 rpm
Fuel Economy
BSFC ........................— 0.358 lblhp-hr (218 gWh) ,r 1600 rpm
(I1 = Inlctniincnl DaLI
E(') = Cnntinuam Data
PERFORMANCE CURVE
215 Ib It
(292 Nml -
Intermittent Torque 168 lb-ft
(228 Non)
80 hp
(60 kW)
Intermittent Power
72 hp
(54 kW.)
Continuous Limit
Fuel Consumption
.ski 12()0 1 . „ .,,, ;, 1tu)0 '-1 WO 22,)il t-100
Engin,: Speed — rpm
200 —
(271) z
X
180
t24a1 1
d
3
160 0
1217)
0.44 3
(268)
0.40 r
,2421 L
a
0.36 1
,216) a
U.

GENERAL DATA: ,
Model.................. .............................. ........................................ 404 5 D
Number of Cylinders ....................
Displacement ....................................... :.................. 4.5 L (276 cu. in.)
Bore and Stroke ................... : 4.19 in. x 5.00 in. (106 mm x 127 mm)
CompressionRatio............:..........................I........................... 17.6.1 '
EngineType .................... ............................... In4ine, 4.cyd- '
DIMENSIONS:
Aspiration............................................................................. Natural
Ungth.................................................................... 33.9 in. (861 mm)
Width....................................................1................ 23.5 in. (598 mm)
Height ....................... ............................... 33.6 in. (854 min) ,
Weight (dry) ................................. I...................... 851 lb. (387 kg) -.
23.5 in. 33.9 in. -
-(598 mm)H (861 mm)
Width Length ,:
FEATURES AND BENEFITS:
Will meet EPA and proposed EEC off -road
emission regulations
• This engine has been developed to meet the off -road emission
requirements without degradation in performance or power level.
Dynamically balanced crankshaft
• Constructed of heat -treated ductile iron for maximum strength.
• Journal surfaces induction -hardened for significantly increased wear life.
Forged -steel connecting rods
• 45-degree connecting-rodlcap-joint design allows the use of
larger crankshaft -connecting -rod bearings for increased
durability.
Replaceable wet -type cylinder liners
• Provide excellent heat dissipation.
• Precision machined for long life.
Adjustable polyvee fan drive
• Ability to adjust the fan to 15 different positions provides superior
application flexibility. The poly-vee Fan drive also provides multiple fan
ratios that can be marched to specific application requirements.
Specifications and design subject to change without notice.
DEERE
DEERE POWER SYSTEMS
3801 W. Ridgeway Ave.
P.O. Box 5100
Waterloo, IA 50704-5100
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
Either -side service
• Service points and filters are available on either side of the engine,
which greatly simplifies engine installation,
Standard gear auxiliary drive
• The provision For a gear auxiliary drive is available on every engine as
standard equipment and provides up to 50 hp (37 BV).
Low noise levels
• A redesigned rocker arm cover, ribbed front cover, and helical front
gears help reduce noise.
Redesigned cylinder block reduces weight
• The weight of the cylinder block has been reduced, while maintaining
overall strength.
• Crankshaft supported by five main bearings.
World -class performance
• Higher torque rise, excellent fuel economy, and low oil consumption
result in superior engine performance.
JOHN DEERE
INTERCONTINENTAL, GmbH
400 191h Street
Moline. Illinois 61265-1388
Phone OK 71,5-3310
FAX [phone]
DEERE POWER SYSTEMS,
JOHN DEERE ENGINE DIVISION
Usine de Saran - B.P. 13
45401 Fleury les Aubrais, France
Phone [phone]
F."1){ (33) 38 82 60 00
DSW008 Litho in U.S.A 05-11)

SAE MOUNT ENGINE DRIVE
Impeller Qinmetcr 13.500 in. Exscd ,fi r r t .-h Wkitc( 0 68 dt:�j,
Uesign Point Pump Sptea: 3000 RPM
=mpg
nflc)
Soo
450 =MWARAIN.
400
cl 350
300
Lk
. =OVA=
j 2 �,O 1
200
150
100
50
0 loo 2-do-6do--400- y06- lob 110i 1201C,
B.E.C. -1,53 CAPACITI IN U.S. GALLOWS F-f K M INOT,
III
SELECTION CONDITIONS
F'low;
700.0 GrM Prirniri�., Tye,,;:
r./A
ToLcl Dynom;c Hood:
400.0 feet
Selection Method:
PUMP Dl-,SCRIPTION
Pump Model:
B.'3 j () R M �� r i In i r i -,j 'I v .
' . I .., ' j V L 3
Irnpvle!r Diorneter:
13.500 in. Irnpuilt:�r
I -on
5 v c. t i n n:
4 " N1 P1 E,
1'
Shaft Seal:
PocKinq
PUMP PERFORMANCE
Fiow:
700.0 GPIA P 0 w t� I.
Total Dynarrtic Head:
568.9 feet
6
S pe c cl:
3000 RPM FS r-�
`,nut —Off Flucid:
560.4 (cet A t� I
c; L, I P
Beet Elf: 74.4
1035.0 GPM
DRIVER INFORMATIOIN
SAC Flows;ny Sie:
4 "'h C, I
Shaft '—r�pknw
I -- 3/8" — 1 CT
PRICE/0RDLR iNFOIOIATIW
365 tts
QUOTE'D BY: Q[-"0TED TO;
L

L/4f- LocK
N+v&'cT6 ?
INEW.:
F,; -x A/)sl -
(LKv F-t,,t)
� rRoM P&nMP To 1�y ,�Nr

�.~ F'�{ #r'-w'_., ems':✓, r.�' G' �•{� �'4'-a���a;
+. �+� ,� ,�� �°�� � .•A ?'t. ti _�.•.: day,; �' - � ter• �'r ! ]'��
r�-tfr a� S r yet �'rl � 7 t - .^"n•, a.d., v.5i�
Y
t/ T.:� �' ir7. .I .t-y±W : F ; _•r�•5 t r ,.C.�: !'r ..F ..� Assembled.
Field Hydrant in
Opened -Position- w/'90
Degree
Valve ConnReel
ection to
Ring-Lock Fitting
y 4i�L rieti"'r,y�'. 3} wSYrS yn\� r r t - rn
rb
aw��x:�,,ir•s,*4 ,�,SM M a
•<=;f'GS{,ht�,'roa r `�YCy�, ' "
r t +
�.6_ � �t
' k,4'� jai: 1 i t�`bFF} i i `rub' t1
1� ilkt`3� *3G s k* RV,S.y Ayr.
Y�" V Cr SI\ ! \
. t
imic • • • r
largeFlex—hose Valve Built—in GasI
•1egree Alum. Fitting
Hydrantr Valve •
k•t,�L {�R l�is�» ir4
7\ r
rr,
.�,�t' � a Lbw _ `M1 K •?�;�'
q :}
Matco Wafer Valve Hydrant wl
Variable Settings

THRUST BLOCKING
ND TEE _ (200 X 16.2) / 1200 = 2.7
(200 X 23.0) / 1200 = 3.8
VD TEE = (200 X 34.8) / 1200 = 5.8
•(200 X 49.2) / 1200 = 8.2

:Hacidlinc�_and Installation of PVC Plastic
'�.--"_-,?Temperature has a major effect on PVC plastic pipe. As temperatures
t� pproach-freezing, the flexibility and impact resistance of PVC plastic
.pi,pe4_:is greatly reduced. At low temperatures when joining solvent weld
e-,I,-a'longer time is required for the glue to set. Generally solvent
w`eltlwpipe,should not be joined at temperatures below 400F. At high
eratures pipe becomes more flexible and set-up time for the glue is
:,,greatly reduced. ,
When pipe is stacked, it should not be placed in piles more -than
.five°feet high. Occasionally out -of -round pipe will result from stacking.
-In.-warm weather, once the weight is removed, it will rapidly assume a'
.,round shape. In cold weather, several -hours -may._be_required -for -the -pipe d- -
�� Ito,return"to the original shape.
Sunlight can have an effect on the pipe, especially in.colors other
than white.' It may warp and exhibit a snaking effect. When left in the
sunlight for long periods, the color may fade and the pipe will harden
at -the surface causing a loss of impact strength. Discolored pipe should
-be handled carefully during installation. If pipe is to be stored out-
side for long periods of time, it should be covered with a cover of
opaque material, not plastic, and air should be able to circulate under
the cover.
Gaskets should be stored away from excessive heat and solvents.
Some pipe comes from the manufacturer with the gaskets installed. If the
pipe is not to be installed immediately, the gaskets should be removed
and stored:
When installing gasket pipe there are several simple steps to follow
that will ensure leak -free joints., The gasket or ring groove should be
cleaned of foreign materials. The gasket should be properly installed.
Ample lubricant should be placed on the male pipe end, the pipe aligned and
the male end inserted into the female end. Some pressure will be required
to force the male end to the correct depth. There will be a reference `
point to indicate the required penetration depth. If penetration is not
deep enough the joint may leak; and if penetration is too deep, there is
not adequate room for pipe expansion. Once the joint is made, the pipe
being installed should be rotated to ensure that the gasket is not pinched.
Gasket pipe may be connected in the trenc" *hn ground beside the
trench and then lowered into the trench. If the latter is done, check
each joint to ensure that penetration is correct. If it is necessary to
cut pipe, either a PVC pipe cutter or a miter box with a carpenter's
fine-toothed handsaw should be used. For gasket pipe, it will be necessary
to bevel the pipe, usually at an 80 angle, at-complished with a special
rasp or file. For solvent weld pipe, burr, chips and filings should be
removed from the outside and inside of the pipe and it is preferable to
slightly bevel the outside circumference.
Fittings for gasket pipe may be plastic or steel. The trend in
the industry today.is to use epoxy coated steel fittings. These are
i manufactured by several companies (McDawell,Pierce, Davis, etc.) and can
-4-

•'i,Ther%etoo! air -release valve diameter to pipe
�A.;�dWmdtW4for,4alves Intended to release air when
: y� ' jfilling;tl 'pipe should not be less than O. t .
However lsh -diameter valves may be used to
lith water`harrimer pressures by controlling air
-�1 eieise . hbie dontrol of filling velocities Is .
;questldhkble. Equhralent valve outlet diameter of
=iless1tftiai.0.i are permitted for continuously
r ;aciing.iali release valves'. Adequate vacuum relief
h trust be provlded.
ql.- release valves or combination air valves shall
°z* beused as needed to permit air to escape from
;;r�;theplpell
ne while the line Is at working pressure.
:.•:,.;Small orifices of these types shall be sized
:aaccordind to the working pressure and vent_Ing
°requ[reiiients recommended by the valve
manufacturer.
Manufacturers of air vales marketed for use
under this standard shall provide dimensional
,data, which shall be the basis for selection and
acceptance of these valves.
Drainage. Provislon-shafl-be madefor
completely draining the pipeline if a hazard Is
Imposed by freezing temperatures, drainage Is
recommended by the manufacturer of the pipe,
or drainage of the line Is specked for the job. If
provisions for drainage are required drainage
outlets shall be located at all low places In the
line. These outlets may drain into dry wells or to
points of lower elevation. If drainage cannot be
provided by gravity, provisions shall be made to
empty the line by pumping or by other means.
Flushing. if provisions are needed for flushing
the line free of sediment or other foreign material,
a suitable valve shall be Installed at the distal end
of the pipeline.
Thrust control. Abrupt changes In pipeline
grade, horizontal alignment, or reduction in pipe
size normally require an anchor or thrust blocks
to absorb any axial thrust of the pipellne. Thrust
control may also be needed at the end of the
pipeline and at In -line control valves.
Thrust blacks and anchors must be large enough
to withstand the forces tending to move the pipe.
Including those of momentum and pressure as
well as forces due to expansion and contraction.
The pipe manufacturer's recommendations for
thrust control shall be followed. In absence of
the pipe manufacturer's requirements, the
Irrigation Water Conveyance 430.00-3
following formula must be used In designing
thrust blocks:
98 HD' a
A a" � sin x
Where:
A - Area of thrust block required in Ita
H . Maximum working pressure in It
p - Inside diameter of pipe in It i
E - AllowWa passive pressure of the soil In
Ibtta
a . oeflea{on angle of pipe bend
Area of thrust blocks for dead ends and tees shall
be 0.7 times the area of block required for a 90-
defiectlon angle of pipe bend.
If adequate sail tests are not available, the
passive soil pressure may be estimated from
Table 1.
Materials. All materials shall meet or exceed the
Tninim um -re quire rrmnts indicated in
"Specifications for Materials.'
Plans and specifications
Plans and specifications for constructing high-
pressure underground plastic pipeline shall be In
keeping with this standard and shall describe the
requirements for applying the practice to achieve
its intended purposes.
Table I. —Allowable soil Gearing pressure
a*= of cc+nr
to canw of MR= block
Narunal sal rnweral
2 ft
] It
ft
51ft
SOund bodrocX.... .__.....
8.000
10.Oc0
10.000
10.000
Ooroo sand arc gra+nf
miawwe tassumea
e- •i........................
1,200
1,800
2.<4
3,000
cons. Are to ==4 sane
(assw•ned a-25•)........
800
1.200
1.fiSO
2.100
silt and clay M=U(a
(assurnea 0 - z5-) •.._...
500
700
Sw
1.240
Soft aav anq arganIc
sake (assumea
fir - 10-1 .........„.............
200
X0
40O
500
SCS, January 1989

DIAMOND PLASTICS
CORPORATION
IPS IRRIGATION PIPE
ASTM D2241
*t;StoGk`.Notatl�bl WolOht OutaEdo Wall Insldo Plocoa Par Foot Par Foot Par •
�1a113''^' Bt�a - -Per 100 ft. Diameter Thickness„ Diameter Sundlo _ Bundlo Trttckl g
2L '..
SDR - 41 100 PSI s.
4.500 .110 4.280 63 1,260 20,160
6.625 .162 6.301 28/32 560/640 81400
8.625 .210 8.205 15/10 300/200 41840
M ,;F; ' 10'!. 10.750 .262 - 10.226 - - - -12 - - - - - -----240-----
- - =M:; 712' 0 :2.750 �.311 12.128 6/8 120/160 •.2,100
SDR - 32.5 125 PSI
M 44.500 .138 4.224 63 1,260 .20,160
M 6". 6.625 .204 6.217 28/32 5601640 8,400
M 8": 8.625 .265 8.095 15/10 300/200 4,840
M 10'.:` 10.750 .331 10.008 12 240 3,420
M 12" 0 12.750 .392 11.966 6/8 120/160 21100
SDR - 26 160 PSI
H 2" 2.375 .091 2.193 204 41080 65,280.
M 3• ';6' 3.500 .135 3.230 88 1,760 28,160
M 4 • 4.500 . .173 4.154 63 1,260 20,160
M 6' 0 6.625 .255 6.115 28/32- 560/640 81400
M 8' 8.625 .332 7.961 15/10 300/200 4,840
M 104 2 10.750 .413' 9.924 12 240 3,420
M 12- •2. 0 12.750 .490 11.770 618' 120/1.60 2.100
SDR - 21 • 200 PSI
M 2" 9..9 2.375 .113 2.149 204 4,080 65,280
M 3" 3.500 .'167 3.166 88 1,760 28,160
M 4". g 4.500 .214 4.072 63 1,260 20,160
M 6• gik $' 6.625 .316 5.993 28/32 560/640 822400
M 8' rw ,� 8.625 .410 7.805 15/10 300/200 4,-i40
M 10•0, 0. 10.750 .511 9.728 12 240 3,420
M 12' 0 12.750 .606 11.530 6/e 120/160 ' 2,100
Prices are subject to a firm policy of "Price in effect at lime of shipment on regular purchase."
Possession of this page of a price list does not constitute an offer to sell.
*Freight regulations Wor equipment may reduce maximum footage per truckload.
All prices F.O.B. manufacturing location.
L = normal stock item at Lubbock, Texas
M a normal stock item at Macon. Georgia
Joints Per Quart of Lubricant
(Furnished)
41" 85
6" 60 Additional Lubricant
8• 45
10• 35 t'
12" 25 12 Qt. per case
15" 15 4 Cal . per ca ;c ZSr,O�O.r ga3i"
18, 12
21" 10
24" $
2.7 5
2

1
Figure No. a
THRUST BLOCKS
1. Tees `
1 6 L I'Iujtgvd End of Tee
J. 40' @I6ow
4. Cnd Caps or Plugs
S. VaIVe
6. Sieep Incline . g .

lotion
(Ions:
RJ PE
IItocaIIca altJil
Excavation i e 160 =Testing, and Back-
filllnp;iristrucRlonrj are vaually provided
2' -. 1•.til-hY
by lhe�npinaen In c�larpe of the project.
Rare `r.onco #iiay.�slso ba;mad0 to Amerl-
can:SoclelyforTestlnp`and Materials
Stondai di4STl1� D 2TT4 'Recommended
Practice for:Unds`rproU tnstallatlon of
TheImopl stloXPresiure.Piping."
Excavation
1. The „trench bottom shall be stable,
con tinuoua"relatively smooth, and free
of racks-or;ather objects detrimental to
the plper�It, ahall.•provide continuous
support f arlhe plpe, and bell holes shall
be provided tforthe bell and spigot Joints,
valves,'and,Other,eystem components
that Tight' acl is' a rulcrum. When made
through a4bck'64'at least 4" of com-
pacted satisfactory bedding material
shall be provided.
2. The trench depth shall place the pipe-
line at least 6" below the lowest recorded
frost depth, and shall place the pipeline
depth at least 30" below grade. .
3. The trenchwidth at the top of the pipe
shall be as narrow as practical to allow
adequate room for joining the pipe and
to allow proper compaction of the eldelill.
Minimum tench width is normally con-
sidered 12",plus the pipe O.D.
4. Pipetlnes shall -be cased, bridged, or
otherwise protected at locations where
they will be subject 10 heavy surface
loads due to shallow burial Casing shall
also be used In spanning creeks and
gullies, extending 8 IL on either eldo of
the creak or gully,
Jointing
1. The pipe shall be Jointed In the trench,
or above ground, in accordance with the
Jointing instructions.
2. It Is Important that the gasket be clean
and properlyseated, lhespigot endwoll
lubricated, and the bell and spigot ends
aligned correctly in both planes.
3. If Jointing Is done above ground, care
should be taken when lowering pipe into
the trench that the depth of the Joint entry
remains correct. Check that the depth
,f entry mark on the spigot ends is flush
.vllh the face of the bell. Jointing of 6'
and largo pfpe Is usuatiydono in the tronch.
.1, AT NO TIME should a back -hoc or
;lmllar device be used to assemble pipe.
Thrust Blocking
As with other push -ill rubber gasketed
Joints, the pipe will not take end thrust
without restraints. Thrust blocks are
usually required at dead ends and
wherever the line changes direction of
30 degrees or more.
1. Thrust blocks shall be placed so that
the bearing,surface Is In direct line with
the major force created by the pipe or
filling. Concrete having a compressive
strength of 2000 psl Is the recommended
blocking material, and may be poured
between the simplest of forms and the
undisturbed earth bearing surfaces.
2. Thrust blocking size maybe calculated
4 as follows:
a) Multiply the pressure level desired
for testing by the value shown in the
table for thrust on fittings:
Thrust In Pounds
Plpo
Silo
Co
Elbow
45
Elbow
22y.
Bond
Dead End
or Too
e-
40.74
20.30
13.45
30.10
e"
02.61
44,72
22.00
61.10
to'
1 126.84
69.47
36.42
1 95.05
12"
1 1e0.54
77.23
49.62
1 133.70
b) Determine the bearing strength of
the soil from the following table:
BEARING STRENGTH OF SOILS
SOIL
lb. per S4 Ft.
Muck, pool, etc.
O
Soft clay
1.000
Sand
.. 2,000
Sand and grovel
3.000
Sand and grnvot comoMod with Clay 4.000
Bard shale
10,000
c) Divide the total thrust on the fitting
(step a) by the bearing strength of
the soil (step b). The result Is the
square foot of area nooded on tho
face of tho.thrusl block
d) Thrust blocks should haunch tho
pipe or fitting, not encase It.
Backflliing
1. Place select backlill and compact
under the haunch, along the sides of,
and over the top of the pipe 10 a com-
pactod depth of at least 8". This backlill
shall be soils that allow good compaction
and placed In e" layers, well compacl ad.
It shall be free of rocks, frozen clods, or
other hard objects.
2. The final backillf may than bo mado In
the usual manner, but care should be
taken not to dump large rocks or heavy
objects on the Initial bacidllland pipeline.
3. It the Joints and fittings must be left
exposed while under test, backlill to
within one foot of each side of the Joint
or fitting to prevent deflection of the
pipe while under test pressures.
Testing
1. ALLAIR IN THE PIPELINE SHALL BE
BLED OFF CAREFULLY WHILE FILLING
THE LINE WITH WATER FOR TESTING.
Entrapped air In the line can .cause ex-
cessive teat pressures; and create un-
necessary problems, Air shall' be bled
off at .the high spots In the line. ,Air
removpf may also be accomplishad'by
pushing a foam plug through the line by
Incoming water pressure, ,
2. Test pressures may be ,t K times the
designed operating pressure of the
pipeline, but shall not exceed the maxl-
mum pressure rating of.lhe pipe.
3. After pressure test and acceptance
of testing, the uncovered Joints and fit-
tings shall be initially backfliled with
well compacted soil, and then covered
with final backflll.
4. Hydraulic pressure testing of the
pipeline shall be carried out Initially at
Intervals not exceeding 500 yards and
thereafter at Intervals not exceeding
1,000 yards.
Radius Bends
Gradual change of direction may be
achieved by deflecting or cocking RISBER
Joints a maximum of 3 degrees without
affecting the hydraulic seat of the joint.
Offsets are made only aftert6o.atralght
In-lineasaomblyismade. Deflactionsat
the Joint and minimum curve radll (ft.)
obtainable are listed below.
Dogroe of
Dofloctlon
at the Joint
Offset, inches Radius, feet
t
4.2"
1,150'
2
0.3"
672'
3
12.3"
Set'
-4-

tiro ,��'�,',�,a�"t -`,• ,
r.��. �� lYt�4,Hni�� •.
r t, •
WfabrEtcated in almost any configuration: Some epoxy coated fittings' :.
de'l,..stacks and hydrants as an 'Integral ,part of the fitting. ,
.. .
°t r
r �8ccasIon ably. it may, be necessary .to :conriect PVC plastic pipe to
stee]
or CA pipe'. ,7his cor nectiori ;an' be' made with .a c•Qupl ing called 'a" 1
a; transition nor repair coupling: In4 ink valves cari be,supplied with"
t, rt�..._ctj o gasket pipe .a
�Diin ec�ir {ons 't • t�.}• ril.s•�,.. ,f;'i r' 1 ,',.ii� l: . • sl•;
Thrust blocking is requi.r'ed for gasket pipe. 'Most thrust blocks•'
wi11 :be ;concrete. ' Manufacturers recommended thrust blocks at any
i3.chinge �-ii1 •d.irection.greater• than .10Figure 1 gives an example -of
' ifferent' arrangements for th cks- ------ - ---c s -
r st b�,o - -- - --•
,. .j1 '� ,r., •� ! •JI'ii,, 11'ii3if v(•}'k ti • ri•'!,
Figure 1.
r
..
PIW
4.H+
Example of different arrangements for thrust blocks.
-- t

-,�• +fir �����1';'�r ' x�," ...
table 2.
Factors for Calculating Thrust W for
Elbows and Tees.
Y r.
Elbows:
900
1.41 Tees 0.70
-
-
45' a
0.76
300 =
0.52
22.50
0,39 •-
Table 3 gives the safe bearing load for different soil types.
Table 3. Safe Bearing Load
Soil .lb/ft2
Mulch,.,peat and similar 0
Soft Clay 1000
Sand 2000
Sand and gravel, 3000 '
Sand and'gravel•cemented-
with clay. 4000
Hard shale 10,000
-W Thrust (Table 1 & Table 2)
Thrust block area(ft2) --
.T soil Searing strength able 3)
In placing concrete thrust blocks, check with the manufacturer of the
pipe being used 'to ensure that the correct size thrust blocks are
being used.
There. are a number of machines that 'can be used to prepare the
trench for PVC plastic pipe..'. Soil types, moisture content, depth of
trench' required and type and diameter of pipe must be considered.
Generally chain trenches, whecl'trenches; backhoes, or vibrating plows
will be used for trench preparation. The vibrating plow can only be
used for solvent weld PVC pipe:and generally is limited to the smaller
diameter of:pipe. Under most conditions the chain trencher or wheel
trencher will be faster than the backhoe. Where wide trenches for large
pipe are required, the 'backhoe :Will be most satisfactory. If soil
conditions permit, long stretches of open trench will expedite pipe
installation. However, if rain is forecast the pipe should be installed
and the trench backfilled. To avoid sharp turns in the line at obstructions,
trenches should be curved within limits of curvature of the pipe.
-7-

h'; d&inagi02;
8.4,;�Flrtil °6ack1111
:' placctl'd�'ipr
to a n liar q.,,j to�ii!
"unrifled
�'' bi`c lifilll�liula)
ind ciHet-dob:;
equlpinont �prcli
df1the pipe to 1Sravlae's4ppot! Ge$ from voids. final bi{ckflll only ■fleet the rnliihnuhr depth of cover hat been
ba)takeu'jtd avoid dafokmlria; displael'j, or placed and only with pipe havlrr8 well thicknesses grauaa than
0.106"ddriiri this phase bf the opsiatioA. ', that of WR-4i.
itei.= ipq6e (eiiini, ilnd ickdi ihail bi " ' SP&rj(m 7-SPfiCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
id Li'..8pproziiriately.uhiform.layeri in such i . 1.1, gill jiotil'foF iubki6F biskit ja[titil. Whets the pipe Whi; irt-
Ithi:(iatsch`cott3p�etely io this, theri will be ii i ttsllcd li providid wlth itlbbef • �lsket JoWs, bell holes rhall be
nder`:ot �btiut melts or lumps bf earth in the excavated'ln thi bedding material to illow for the unobstructed
ieltfW' ihill be free of large rocks, frozesi clods assembly of iha jalht. Cara ihoidd be taken that the bell hole Is no
greeter thari 16 him 3 in, lit dismetet. R6111n# larger thin nettisary W sccdm llsh propeiJoInt assembly. Whell the
ii,aiiitpers 64buld bi tliej la,consolidate thb • jam hast'betn tirade; the bell, hole ih6uld be cuefully Med with
iLZ It -- TH11tilit 8L0CklkG AND "CH01i5 Yba VbltiHitl' t6UNb 1ttltldAtlOk UIikW4EA1
M61tiplt^(Il4 itdAbi'lt bii"L11 by thi 86p6or.146 inlus
t i adtlo tiowdi i1 ivl lsble ld obrain ;
o {}
a4 f...{�,1p�s.11la�'P1(itsr Aoioltsk t
-
8tai n.ia lord, oo• .set• 22-1le
la'•w6.e1, iifc 66ii ` r` its''ee jlbow $lbo4 Elbow
' 144 8tl # ' + d.94 ,' 1.16.:. 9.26 1.15• '
2 + t10.8.1 ' t ! i 4.6A A.46 . I.SO i.78
t 2.112 63.6 , :. 6.'' '136, 9.40.. a.10 . 2.60
8 70.1 9,80 , ' i3.9 7.51 ' 8.82 -
3.112 98.0 12.9 19.1 9.91 4.99
4 101.0 10.2 23.0 12:4 6.31
5 127.0 24.7 85.0 18.9 9.83
e�1<14 0 152.4 14.8 40.2 20.7 13.6
209.2 ID.O 93.5 45.2 23.0
;'. ► 'l R:6�• �� id `" 264.0 01.6 130.0 70.0 36.8
.4 �t .;}� � It ¢' 12 804.8 120.6 192.0 98.5 50.3
.ija
t nlr;q* i Based On ihrustpei kP4 {yid) brassura
sl! e
�•, q..• t . 131acklnr for brood may not be needed with long breach lines.
3 rMi. �� r0.►! -
$tap i. DsierhJili thi bi"i itrinsth of the soil from the table
bilot4t
>�
fll:Altlri0 STR$NGTII OF 501L3
boils ibi Site bsiilag Load;
1b11t2
kYs
•
Sound Sliali '
16 006 .
478.8
Cemelited Grivel atitl 9irici
difficult to pick
4 000
101.E
Coari6 iird find compiot Sand-
3 000-
143.8
Medium Clay-Caii bi ipadad `•
2 000
95.8 -
Soft Clay
1 000
47.9
Muck
••.0
0
Step S. Divide the total thrust obtiliiid . Ste 1 by the bearing
strength of the colt to I I the area tiaeded, m2 (ft2).
StpE T1l[tusT ALTLI1l1AtlC lltlacktitiitJe �'
141A Slss Sldi Thrust -per Degrade
[a, nun Ib N
+
1-112
88.1
6.1 22.7
•
2
50.8
7.0 36.1
2.112
03.5
11.0 61.6
ti
3
70.2
17.1 76.1
3 112
88.0
22.4 99.6
4
101.0
28.3 126.9
+ .{
y.,
6
127.0
43.1 191.7
0
.152.4
fl0.1i 270.6
8
203.2
103.0 458.2
10
254.0
160.0 711.7
12
304.9 ' `
'" 125.0 1000.8
4 tlasad on lids thrust tier 480
LPt (flip fl.I) prosaun Jyar degree of
dallsedan.
r,.
*;� f
�'�'•��•
NOTZ!,Multlply
iidi tlrk%jit frohl
1,0441 Wdilrliis of diheetlon
/
tl+nas kPi (p.11) divided
J .
Ly 100.to
1. i 1 .
ol,talri total atdi thrust
•

Brock Equipment CO.
P.O. Box 100
Bailey N.C. 27807
[phone]
Quantity
3,200'
Description
T _ Price Each
SDR 21,200 PSI PVC pipe 1,00
Price Total
3,200.00
4"
3
4"
45" Elbows 35.00
105,00
2
4"
90" Elbows 35.00
70.00
1
4"
Gasketed Tee
45.00
6
2"
Air Releases 75.00
450.00
1
4"
Lagoon Hydrant
235.00
8
4"
Field Hydrants 235.00
1,880.00
2
4"
Alum. 90° Elbows 75.00
150.00
System Design
600.00
Thrust Blocking
150.00
Labor
3,200.00
Tax
61.35
Total.
$10,146.35
Dwight Mayo
New Farm
PO Box 481
Pine Level, NC 27568
3-6-99

mi
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919--1733 -99/9
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-YSI - SD5'a
SWCD 919-989 - 53,01
NRCS 919-9fq - s361
This plan will'be implemented in the event that wastes from
-your operation -rare leaking, - overflowing;-- or -running-off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.'
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. add soil to berm 'Co increase elevaticn of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate..
C. Stop all -flows to the lagoon immedi azely.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lacccn.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary_ diversion to contain waste.
10 c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate IC -he reasons) t ar
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the applicaticn rates acr t'-e fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers --action
include:
a. Stop recycle bump.
�. Stop irrigation sump.
C. Close valves =o el mina4e _�r er disc arce.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators --action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and + fill holes and com„cac t^
with a clay type soil. C. Have a professional evaluate the Ccnditicf of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for wha-r-
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
6. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f . Could a future rain event cause the s_:'_ i l to reach
surface raters?
g. Are potable water wells in dancer (either cn or c__
of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
_,. During normal busivess hours, cam.__ Wcur DWQ
( Vvis icn of Water QL aiit;i , regional i Thcre
_, - - After hours, emergency ..umber:-
732-3942. Your phone cal_ shouldinclude: ycur
name, facility, telephone number, - e details cf

1
e '
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919- - , local SWCD
office phone number 919- - and local MRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Fame: ,� o 5 P�v v Vecviy,,
b. Contractors Address:
c . Contractors Phone: �yy--gip
6:
Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: , ris 5,W, t
b. Phone: 19/
-- Z 0;2,Y
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWO and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
:1 Cudlf nnanr w Orai . T Gnc SGI en. aci
rent 7:.95

f
I
Swine farm Waste Management Oder Control Cherltllst
------. .._ 1.11111 + C. .. - ...--- ---_--+ �Jll]4 RK11's low Minimi-ic Odm- ..5llc sluxific Praclices - --
1'.Irul:.l.:.ul .. .-`�1,'tlll: tHu[IIIGII[111-�.4-----------jvf �/l:�Cri1tIVC Ill IVIfIfllCll Igli•I�:f'i; .
Witc"."InFlIcIlded best nl"Ill;lg4nlCnl prat_liccs;
F-K'(inod judgnlcnl and cnrnnlon sense
Atill 11,11 11,Id Sr111 ICC -• - Dilly nlamitc-covered mlillmh my llllnrs
Wcl uli,nulc r.uverl+l Ibnus f�'Itllled I]onrs:
f�! Walcrels localed liver skiled floors;
-pri ce,lcrs at Ilii;h end of solid floors; IVIX
R Srlll,e IMIMIre 111611101) until fill(Wi;
- -� -----
f�1�tllnlcllloorvcltIiIilIion fill-dr}'inl; 1;�,5/
NI.M1111: 1 i111-:1 11011 ltll}
I fl Ine;
— iI1[' 141111"ll lllalime rentnvill by flush, ph reclliff-ge, ---- ----
•
Vmlial lllicinilial dCcr ikpilsltilin
rlr sl'I it Ili.;
fl tlndcliloor VcIililaliml
V .: 11111.11,+tt1 , �11,1t 1-.I I.ln-, •
Lrularill: J!ascs;
f ;ul nl-linit'nalria:; .
! lust
fQ 1'fliciclll air nl,lveulclll
ln.l+l+tr ;1111,1++::. -
1111:+I
LUaS11dl1Wn b1'ItVLI:n i,lr,11IY' ufi111i111i1I5; I .�
i-�'ccrf tulrlilives; �� y,
Fl Fecdt:r i:11v1:,s; 1'114
.r
/1
f f FCC11 111:11Vc1y 111I1vilg1tItII CA11:111 cIti 11t 1CCrl(:r—,DO4,4 .5Q>-! )'—*o Cov e`f ,
covers
i-1u-.11 I.u+i.a ----,ll;il;l,ilul
_
uflCCy'clCll fill;null ._�
Cj Fli sll Iillll icnVels.
Iilltlill whiffs Bulks :111: fillilli,
n Extend fill lima In u[:,Ir Ilullnnl oflanl;s,vith
Agitaliou dnrini, ,vaslc,valcr
� f 1 I lncicfllanr flush ,villl nn11,:r!]un} ve nlilarinn
t:rlllVcyiIIW1:
k'il 1+:+ Il.11l r Ili illll ,
Agilation ul'itrcycl�ll I II;null
-
f) E:klend lrcciuirE/il-in'+:rs its 111:,,r f,orll,nl„I l,ils
hllrlld %vili : Elrls ill(: filling
{
,vilh illlll-sIIIIIIIII vcilvi IVIA
IIi :Illiun'• •
A Il'e111111 title ll11, st111111 Ii1111.
StIlli Ii hill; cnvu15
filling ilnll 11(iRyd U,VII
.
r Iulai+l+: +ll.11u ++1�1.+ flint
ul 111lI+(lull In+;.r..
AI;lIilllUll +1111itI lvil:.i,:lvilll:r
Lt111V+:�'dn+:L•
it lick Cuvl,s J�/I
I /'f

HN111's 111 Minlinize 04hir Slle Specific Prackcs -
l:llll ufll,.11l1131111:, It Al;iti11111u illlrjll�; 1Vilsl�LValCr f:xtcq[! IIiSCIIilrI;L' poilil (lflfil)CS nnderlicalll
1.11;,,I III CtllkvCyiLILCC h8cimi Iliplid It:vd
l ill.ulnl _n11.n `idalik: gas elillsslnlls; - ----"- lii1111Cr Lignnll Iillllill capacity;-
• ItiIII111;ical mixing; f4�rnrrect Iigmin stalltyl llroccillires; 3 -y r�o� L(Ji'�lTr� r1 • ,
• Agilarinli r4 Nliiliu}utu stlrfacc UCil-In-vulllll►c ruin;
ILlI­-I'lininuun agitalinn whell l)1linp1ng;
n M CCII;luical ilCIitIi011; /v%,4'
n Prnvcll hinlnl;ir-al adililives /V!A
lU II,.11 illll >lll Illl. 1.-1 •
l lll;ll I1rl:ss111C ill;llill![1[I;
l-lll lhilltl lltl (if -y dilyS wllh llllle (1r HO \Vllill;
1111[l•
k1711ill Il,'11t
I� IL1111iElilllli CL'4f1111111CI1[It;fl IillCfillllkj� 11I'C55liCC;
la' 1'r111111 jnlilkc IlCill' laiynnll Ijlµlill surface;
-
n 1'Inull finln st:cnull-slal;c lil�nnn �/ � — 5'fR c�v� .0 A oal�
:lIu,1l;l: I,IIIL '.1 kw. ill
_ _
1',Illw Iilei nllial Ilccnnllmsitiml:
n Ilnllnnl nr III illleve I,rnlinl;;
uI l•„ `"
Mixllll; while fllllill;;
n I iUkl: f:nVl r5; �/
/ VI�
• :11;italinn w1wit cnilllyiul;
n Ililsl[151t1f1[:I:Il1illSnl•Sflllllti;
n I'rlivcil llirlllll;ical additivc!; m. nxilliulls
:,.ulllll; I .r.l } .I II1... ,:
- I',Iriill n1i.:,Ilhiill Il,a:n,ulln::iliulr;
fall nll drain11j111: nulkis 11101:lucalll liquid
- flIt%iug wII114: 1iIIinl;;
II:vcI;
- Al;Hiuilin l 1wit cn1111yjrrl;
1-1 licnuly+: slallrll snliflti rI:1;Itlally
l•Ll,klll .., '.Ill, l',' III '.lI I+11,1:
• 11 l;il iltilill 11:111: 11 [i1111::I 111 111::
n 'lnjf illjl:Cli1111 fl l•Slnli y/:iln lll,Ci; - -- ----------_--- W.^—+-------'----
lll.'.l,l. , .alll, ! .
Ira11i11111; ;il:i clili:•::inlls
!
I
f -I Wa:,lk Ic'ii(hr,Il niiinnrc lilun slnl:iulcr all,:r usr,;
I I !'I fI V,:n IIi111111;lI::II :11 IlialV,::: III Ilx i/lillll:: /�
I it, Ilk. I. .I Iu�l illn �'
• IIu I.11 lll: !: d'i cllll:.', 111l I'i 1L'llll
I I �illll 1111CClEI III Ill S1[III}'/:.l loll l,e:>
>InII}- ..I •.I,I,111: Ian II. L!
Ill}'i,11•
rl 'nil illcm ul,iltinu wilhin Ali Ills ;
n `�1ul:all in Illin llnilinln ll)•r.ls I+,r riysill Illyinl;:
1 1 1'141VI:I11111tI1i1,k1:i11 ii+l,lltiv ": lit IIx Il I�llkl::
I
r� 111111I:f lr�.l �f lhklinl� n1.1 1l l:a:.:.,::i
-
I .,II 1..1'.': ,II:II loll ], l'•il it 111
t
- -
i 'unillllal: r,u�',:, in1; n! I::u r.;l :.Ia in hu1 ial 1iit:+;
1,n .
1 1 1 Illl W( 1,ic a I it lI ki111%I11JI Ii1111 (11-Ili•. f:•..11 il•
III- III, I I n I, I I I I I I I� I+t,,1011 I l I I', I i„ II
li ,. 1) ..
f I '�,:1 ,nllLll }' :,L11 1. Ilu1111:1:. 111114
t.1, 11 1l , I„I.., I I . I'I`Iri, I•.Il,r.'I.

N-lortality ManaQeFnent -Methods
(check which methed(s) are being- implemented)
Burial three fee: beneath the surface: of the around within hcu:s after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 fee: from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
�Rendeninz at arendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-I63.7
Complete incineration
�.' In the case of dead poultry only. placing iii a disposal pit of a size and design
aporoyed`by the Department of Agt-iculture
Any method ,vh1jc � in the professional oolnicn of the State Vete:inara n ,would
make possible the salvage of pant of a dead animai's value withcuL
human or animal health. (Written approyaI of the State Veterinarian
attached)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sulircc C'uus(: 1IMPS lu coull'+II 111SCCIS Site Specific I'r-at
Liquid Systrnis �----- ---
FbINh ( 4111el5 Accumulation of solids GYf-lusb system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accuumlaled solids from
hers as designed.
' f itetuove bridging of amillillialed solids ill
discharge
f . lgucolis ,uld fits Cl Ilstcrl Solids lvfailtulin lagoons, settling basills and hits where
pest breeding; is apparent to minimize the
crusting of Solids to a deptli of no more fluor 6 -
8 inches over more 1han 30% of sut (lice.
I:ACcS:�ivc VCLmalive • Occaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along batiks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accu11111hlioll of decaying; vegetative matter
along; water's edge cm impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
F�:eJu:. - - v— • Fecd Spillage Design, I)perale and ulaililain reed systems
bunkers and Iruul;hs) 10 minialize Ills
a cimmIalion of decaying; wastage.
Gears up spiII08C oll n routioc basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day inlcrv;lI III rini; SII[IIIfIUr; 15-30 day interval
(P6111; wiuier). — - -- --
Fee+l Slmist;c - Accomnlations of reed resialalcs — [41"'Iteduce moislnre accunmialion within and
armllld ImI1ledlale perlllletel. all Iced slolal;e
areaS by inslrliug; drlin.1l;c: away r141111 Silc
and/or providing ade(guale colvainlllcnt W.g.,
covered lain for brewer's grain mid similm high
nmislure grain prai+lucls).
[-) inspect liir and renuivc or lareak ugi accilnnllate+i `"
solids ill filter strips around fVed slnraf,e as /_ fY
necdcd.
:.L A N I [ ' - Tlu%,L:mbcr 11, 1996, Page I

Se,nrcc Cause 1INJI's lu Control lusccls Sile Specific Practices
Animal I lidding Arcas Accumulations of animal wastes (3 Climinale low areas that trap maisture along and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is %
minimal.
0 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize ^I
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and / `/�
remove or break tip accumulai d solids as
I)Herded}-
, y)tit�uwrc I Iat,�lling Accumulations of animal wastes Cl Remove spillage on a rouline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
5) sl"its day interval during summer; 15-30 day utterval
during winter) where mamire is loaded for bout
application or disposal.
f7 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
rstockpiles. I
11 Inspect for and remove or break up accuuudateel
wastes in filter ships around stockpiles and l
m:uture handling; areas as neceled. /
For umrc inCornruion con[acl the Cooperative Extcusinn Service, Ueparlment of lauonmlogy, Box 7613, North► Csu-alina Slate I lnivcrsity, '
Italcigh, Ni", 27695-7613. I
AKIW - thivemiscr 11. 1996, Page 2

State of North Cat'olina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 27, 1999
Dwight Mayo
M & M Farms
3352 Hwy 70 East
Smithfield, NC 27577
IT A T'T
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510129
Additional Information Request
M & M Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Dwight Mayo:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before I can continue my review. Please address the following by October 27, 1999:
Please provide documentation that establishes when construction of your lagoon began and when
construction was completed. Documentation may include receipts that clearly show work on the lagoon or
statements from contractors or county agents involved in the construction or certification of the lagoon.
2. Please have a technical specialist verify in writing that the liner of the lagoon was re-evaluated (since it
appears that the lagoon was out of use and vulnerable to damage) when the lagoon was certified in June
1999.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject.permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before October 27, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Zcerely,
Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 , Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NORTH
NATURAL RESDURCES STREET
$C ITHFi;ELD, NC 27577 9998 SM
SERVICE 919 934-716fi Irxt ; 3
91:9 98 5475 FAX
October 7, 1999
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit ,
NC DENR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC
SUBJECT: Application No. AWS 510129
M & M Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Ms. Homewood:
This project was sited for construction 9/14/94. The design was completed 1/23/95.
Construction was started around September 1, 1995 and completed 9/ 18/95. The lagoon
sat there empty, out of use, from 9/ 18195 until Spring of 1999. A that time, we looked at
the lagoon again and were not satisfied with the clay liner. We then had Mr. Mayo reline
slopes 1, 2, 3, and part of 4 as well as all of the bottom. To the best of my knowledge,
the liner appears to be in good shape at this time.
If you need any additional information, please get in touch with us.
Sincerely,
Chris W. Smith
Soil Conservation Technician
cc: . Dwight Mayo

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
October 21, 1999
Dwight Mayo
M & M Fars
3352 Hwy 70 East
Smithfield, NC 27577
M?WA
IT 0 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NA-ruRAL RESOURCES
Subject Application No. AWS510129
Additional Information Request
M & M Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Dwight Mayo:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by November 20, 1999:
The lagoon at this facility was constructed in the summer of 1995. According to state regulations (15A
'NCAC 2H .0200) any lagoon that has been unused for four years or more must be considered new and meet
current NRCS Standards for lagoon design and construction. It does not appear that this lagoon meets
current standards. Please contact a technical specialist and review your lagoon design. Please provide
documentation that your lagoon meets all current NRCS design and construction standards (with the
exception of siting criteria).
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject -permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before November 20, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
2S� ely,
e Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Chris Smith, Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

l L A.5. OsI r`/7c 4'
.f
USUA
NRCS
201 St. Andrews Street
Room 138
P.D. Box 10
Tarboro, NC
27886
Telephone
[phone]
TO: Chris Smith, Soil Conservation Technician
SUBJECT: ENG — Dwight Mayo
Swine Waste Management System
Johnston County, NC
DATE: March 8, 2000
FROM: Joy Sherrod r
WgrERQ q� YVS O
,JUP1.1 9 20UJ
Non-D schar93 PQM tUng
You have informed me that the addition to Dwight Mayo's waste
treatment lagoon has been completed. I have reviewed the "As Built"
plans and the construction notes. These items are adequate
documentation that the structure was built according to NRCS
standards and specifications. This letter serves as construction
approval once Mr. Mayo precharges the lagoon and seeds the dike.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
5ae,: %i]r. /?ityo Acs vice el dl'ie kel Oi+e 7D
�J

LAGOON SU!T-'u%hi SIiL•'L•T
6 TYI'IC,+L CROSS-SECTION�
-fop Width
r �
Seatt' l Ld top of dam AWWRIGAC0KtrUCt tPP of cis &
y3.8o
Fill Yardage: hem 17 //p001.14
Lg,>,
3 3
NCktUral grOUnd elev.
citt off peal -4-�
i/1 Pr Re a NYC C� �Y c�rEsr.,r-�_��-.-•---�-+-A---. _
Start land applicatiaq;-) Stop land aGn'ir.ation
_-- 're
mporary Volumes ^_-^
---------- r___--------
&c. n t -- - XcY. 3 8.x a P' f ,fin ra•.�
SUppor t--- rcatment Volume
Tip of sludgo taI ev. I
3----------------------------------
Rott-ow elev.
Lagoon sire: Length Zvi
41iclt't-i� Cu. Yds. e::c..�v,.lac! SE /Iq�rnc+lf
�7r:U dqe O Coe)0Cf$
GENERAL I NF= aRmAT I Ot4 f
.IO2 CLASS: 7� nay �y s�►
HAZARD CLASS:
ANIMAL TYPE & NUMBEF'.564;rYle �a--360
KIND OF OPERATLON:
FNOTE: If constructionconsiruction • nr
started within
plan is not valid until r =
-a-Fety hazard is made.
"We'r irtcn7 iVo4'f79 uies7 Qorne.- 0
El evat i 0
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL WASTE �
(SINGLE STAGE)
—T mulCE)Ilt�T r
U. S. DEFAfiTHE.NT OF GRICULTURC
SOIL CONSERVATION SERV 17E
DESIGNED BY%
APPROwD On
TITLE: !
,RYp0,i1r,e 6045 6eed� tl9-Acc.�7 /VRCS S/ec/t ;cd//,fA
.scT
DM"

1 riihtt ' I Ur G
OPERATION AND MAINTT£NANCE' PLAN
--r-----------------------_.---
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
- The -designed temporary storage consists of 180 days -storage --for. —
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent.marker must be installed at this elevation
to -indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching..
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage.to crops.
The following.items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary st ale pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevatio s marked by permanerjt8 arker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation • This temporary
10�1
ge, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains cubic feet or
gallons. FJev ��,7.39.g
99

SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3.
inch per hour. Refer to the -waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
a and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted -from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of'Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.-
f�.

aest� h
USDA
am -
NRCS
201 SL Andrews Street
Room 138
P.O. Box 10
Tarboro, NC
27886
Telephone
[phone]
TO: Chris Smith
SUBJECT: ENG — Dwight Mayo Swine Waste
Management System
Johnston County, NC
DATE: January 13, 2000
FROM: Joy Sherrod
I have reviewed the proposed waste treatment lagoon design for
Dwight Mayo. I understand when the existing lagoon was
constructed, the operator did not stock hogs. - He now wishes to do so;
however, the Division of Water Quality is requiring him to meet
present NRCS standards. Mr. Mayo's operation does not have to
meet the present siting distances.
I have reviewed your design on expanding the existing lagoon. The
additional one foot in height and 140 feet in length does provide the
lagoon volume required by our present standards.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.

Dec 07 99 10:04a
Margaret S- Knight
2526417902
p.2
0 , � f-, 3)3
- /Dt-a/-ar9t 40
(f-/jSL7e
OSA

- - - - ----------------------
......... ..
. ..........
�.....__ �u ���� v-� �� a..�l a�.. �_ �, �n jam-. _ _ ._-� - _... a � ��/ -- - �'.... - / �; �._��_�.. ____ _.__�_...__--_-.._
Oa a�
------- - -------
1A
-----------

fi
40,
.. .............
X-7

2
i6or
z
.,..__._......_._---._._.._.---...�-- '� .�f,�t�r it p /N/J oGu�.% '-►d �n'!_l.� __.�,��� h/�,....�__...._.�

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAMEDwight Mayo
COUNTY Johnston, NC
TODAY'S DATE ____________________________________> November
16, 1999
SITING LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) ____________> Yes
NUMBER OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER _______________
0
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH
3,360
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING_____________:
0
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER _______________
0
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
.0
NUMBER OF DEVELOPING GILTS ------==- ---=-----------
0
NUMBER OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS =____ =_=
0
NUMBER OF LAYERS
0
NUMBER OF DAIRY COWS
0
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
(5 years minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
DEPTH OF PERMANENT WATER 6.9
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth of sludge = 2 feet) .
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 567,000.0
Permanent Volume Provided 572,186.1
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED)
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON-VEG.)
(Le.. feedlot & non -diverted area)
ADDITIONAL D. A. WITH EVAPORATION
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS =------------•
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE
25YR124HR STORM RAINFALL
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON -VEGETATED AREAS
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O)
FREEBOARD ___________________—_____ --
Page 1 of 7
459 FEET
209 FEET
39 FEET
38 FEET
32 FEET
feet
3 :1
cubic feet
cubic feet
3 s, 0v-1Cc�,�
34 60
0
SQUARE FEET
0
SQUARE FEET
0
SQUARE FEET
180
DAYS
0
GALLONS
21.7
INCHES
30
PERCENT
65
PERCENT
12.6
INCHES
. 6.7
INCHES
0.0
INCHES
0.0
INCHES
1.0
(NUMBER ONLY)
1.0
FEET

ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION __________________= 43.8 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 406,467.9 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 428,967.9 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation - 43.8 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
. Length 490.0 feet Width 240.0 feet
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP_____________--_=--=-W- 2.90 FEET
Volume To Be Pumped = 275,147.91 cubic feet
Volume for Estimated Depth - 296,141.74 cubic feet
Begin Pumping Elevation - _-"41.60 'feet _... _.... _
Stop Pumping Elevation = 38.70 feet
DESIGNED BY: (1i'Y UJ'Anvie APPROVED BY:
DATE: l oZ a D D DATE:
yob w, 9
�DiuM, /Veed��
Pr,0nAW4 ViJkMe l�L /Y�,
Vo f u mt -r� c�a 9g, Iyl' %y
I r11 r �'I
i
Page 2 of 7

1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
head weanling to feeder x 30 lbs.
= 0
Ibs
3360
head feeder to finishing x 135 Ibs.
= 453600
lbs
0
sows farrow to weanling x 433 Ibs.
= 0
lbs
0
sows farrow to feeder x 522 lbs.
_ . 0
Ibs
0
sows farrow to finishing x 1417 lbs.
= 0
Ibs
.0
developing gilts x 150 lbs.
= 0
Ibs
0
stud boars or gestating sows x 400 lbs.
-- 0
lbs
0
layers x 4 Ibs.
— 0
lbs
0
head dairy cows x 1400 lbs.
= 0
Ibs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW)
= 453,600
lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at varying rates.
0
pounds weanling to feeder x 0.25
453600
pounds feeder to finishing x 0.25
0
pounds farrow to weanling x 0.17
0
pounds farrow to feeder x 0.17
0
pounds farrow to finish x 0.25
0
pounds of developing gilts x 0.25
0
pounds of boar studs or gest. sows x 0.125
0
pounds of layers x 0.275
0
pounds of dairy cows x 0.929
TOTAL SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design Treatment Volume varies by animal type.
0
pounds weanling to feeder x 1.0
453600
pounds feeder to finishing x 1.0
0
pounds farrow to weanling x 0.67
0
pounds farrow to feeder x 0.67
0
pounds farrow to finish x 1.0
0
pounds of developing gilts x 1.0
0
pounds of boar studs or gest. sows x 1.0
0 pounds of layers x 2.5 -
0. pounds of dairy cows x 1.0
TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME REQUIRED FOR LAGOON
TOTAL VOLUME FOR TREATMENT AND SLUDGE
Page 3 of 7
= 0
— 19400
cu. ft. /
cu. ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
— 0
• cu. ft.
— 0
cu. ft.
= 0
cu: ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
113,400 cu. ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
— 453600
cu. ft.
— 0
cu. ft.
— . 0
cu. ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
- 0
cu. ft.
-- 0
cu. ft.
_ 0
cu. ft.
= 0
cu. ft.
453,600.0 cu. ft.
567,000.0 cu. ft.

4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation
38.7 feet
Construct lagoon bottom to elevation (finished)
31.8 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula:
SS/END1 SS/END2 SSISIDEI SSISIDE2
DEPTH
3 3 3 3
6.9
AREA OF TOP
..LENGTH---'-,..z _--.WIDTH ....:_._ _----_._..--_._.- .....__..,-----
-
459.4 209.4 96198.4 square feet
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb x Wb
418.0 168.0 70224.0 square feet
AREA OF MIDSECTION
Lm x Wm ,
438.7 188.7 82782.7 square feet
CU. YD. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM]'
DEPTH/6
96198.4 331130.8 70224.0
1.2
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL =
572,186.1 cu. ft. ;
VOLUME NEEDED -
567,000.0 cu, ft.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE: 459.4 FEET LONG BY 209.4 FEET WIDE
5. DAM
Place spoil as a continuos dam to elevation 43.8 feet.
... Page 4 of 7

6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA;
Lagoon (top of dam)
Length x . Width
490.0 240.0 117600.0 square feet
Additional Drainage Area Without Evaporation
Vegetated 0.0 square feet
Non -Vegetated 0.0 square feet
Additional Drainage Area With Evaporation
0.0 -square feet
TOTAL DA 117600.0 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
0
'head weanling to feeder x 0.5 gals/day --
0
gals/day
3360
head feeder to finishing x 2.3 gals/day —
7728
gals/day
0
sows farrow to weanling x 7.2 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
sows farrow to feeder x 8.0 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
sows farrow to finish x 23.0 gals/day —
0
gals/day
0
developing gilts x 2.5 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
stud boars or gestating sows x 6.7 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
layers x 0.045 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
head dairy cows x 22.0 galslday —
0
gals/day
TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE =
7,728.0
gals/day
Volume = 7728 gals/day x 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 185,967.91 cubic feet
6B.
Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by the largest amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) .= 9.1 inches
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc. + volume from other sources
Volume = . 89,180.00 cubic feet
Page 5 of 7

6C. Volume of fresh water added
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume of fresh water
used for a flush system. Flush systems that recycle the lagoon water are accounted
for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallonstday x 180 days in pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cubic foot.
Volume = 0.00 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc. + volume from other sources
Volume = 65,680.00 cubic feet
6E. Volume of "Heavy Rain"
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc. + volume from other sources
Volume = 65,660.00 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 185967.91 cubic feet of waste
6B. 89180.00 cubic feet of excess rainfall
6C. 0.00 cubic feet of fresh wash water
6D. 65860.00 cubic feet of 25yr - 24hr storm water
6E. 65660.00 cubic feet of heavy rainfall
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 406,467.91 cubic feet
7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED•(ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
VOLUME OF TEMPORARY STORAGE WHEN TOP OF DAM IS 43.80 FEET ELEV.
AREA OF BOTTOM = 96198.4 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 113256.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 104575.9 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED - 428967.91 cubic feet
'THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 43.8 FT.
ARE: 490.0 FEET BY 240.0 FEET
Page 6 of 7

8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 185967.91 cubic feet of waste
6B. 89180.00 cubic feet of excess rainfall
6C. 0.00- cubic feet of fresh wash water
TOTAL VOLUME TO BE PUMPED = 275,147.91 cubic feet
VOLUME AT ESTIMATED PUMPING DEPTH
AREA OF BOTTOM = 96198.36 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 108138.24 sq. ft.
AREKOF MID -SECTION = . 102092.61 'sq.' ft.
PUMPING VOLUME PROVIDED - 296,141.74 cubic feet
Page 7 of 7

IZ/

OH-Vers-23
Designer CWS
Date 12/21/99
Job Number 001
BOt Left Right Off-CL
Width
SS
SS
(ft)
128
3:1
3:1
336.0
128
3:1
3:1
336.0
128
3:1
3:1
336.0
128
3:1
3:1
336.0
128
3:1
3:1
336.0
128
3.1
3:1
336.0
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
DWIGHT MAYO
in
Johnston County, NC
CL Dist
Sta (ft)
3+64
36
4+00
50
4+50
50
5+00
14
5+14
8
5+22
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
Checker
Date
** Excavation **
**
Fill **
Area
Volume
Area
Volume
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
84.0
0.0
1395.4
0.0
2009.2
0.0
3092.1
0.0
1330.3
0.0
2473.8
0.0
1341.5
0.0
695.4
0.0
1341.0
0.0
371.1
0.0
1164.2
0.0
Total =
8027.9
Total
- 0.0

OH-Vers-2.0
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
DWIGHT MAYO
in
Johnston County, NC
Designer CWS
Date 12/21/99
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
Checker
Date
** Excavation **
Top
Left
Right
Off-CL
CL
Dist
Area
Volume
Width
SS
SS
(ft)
Sta
(ft)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
0+00
0.0
55
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
0+55
0.0
55
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
1+10
0.0
50
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
1+60
0.0
50
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
2+10
0.0
55
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
2+65
0.0
55
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
3+20
0.0
50
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
3+70
0.0
50
0.0
10
3:1
3:1
50.0
4+20
0.0
Total =
0.0
**
Fill **
Area
Volume
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
1.0
2.3
1.3
61.0
58.6
212.8
171.2
460.3
325.8
681.6
343.3
670.1
314.6
466.6
189.3
187.3
13.0
Total
= 2742.0

U. S. Depzri:r,,e r. of Agriculture (JS)
Soil Conservac',.on Service 9/12
VOLUME ESTIMATE FOR EARTH EMBANKMENT
Name
Address f
Embankment;
Top Width
Side Slopes
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
( Feet)
END AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
SUM OF
END AREAS
(Sq. Ft.)
DISTANCE
( Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
(Cu. Ft. )
I -? 0
aZ S
6 5
13j
.
I
i
1. Double Volume of Fill 2 = �V :21)- Cu. Ft. A/f 911
2. Volume of embankment fill (line'1 = 27;= � � % Cu. Yds.
/allowance for settlement (5 or 109; o: line 2) Cu. Yds.
Total cubic yards (line 2 + line 31=,,Cu. Yds.
Computed by , Date
A

i
U. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-17a
Soil Conservation Service 8/72 (file code ENG-12)
END AREA COMPUTATIONS FOR DAMS - COORDINATE METHOD
Location
Site
Computed By
Date
Watershed
Item
Checked By
Date
Remarks:
Sta. 3 U
Elev.
51,9a G.A.
T.W.
D.E.A.(
) x .5
- E.A.( }
Sta. 4-00
Elev.
G.R.
T.W.
D.E.A.
) x .5
= E.A.
13a3S,�
/53�5
/75�0
/ 755
/S'9oC;
/�7r35�
/5a1�Z
a 9 7
3s
4-00
5-6 0
4,
�3
a97
li s1-'oi 6
6,1
/7�?o
i 7s5�
.</�5�
o3 azd
68u8
Sta. 4-.52)
Elev.
G.R.
T.W.
D.E.A. ( ) x .5
- E.A. (
I.z4eB
/y.'-8b
/�s:0
i7J�D
f53 1•�/
/�7 Z
/y.3 0.�
y.?.8�
4<G. Aso
3�• S
3 �
.�/.8
�S
�8
/D�I,DS3
�S
35b
f v
LSD
3
1, u
3
3os
Ice, 7�0
1/980
o
/a�o.y
1i63�-
/a68yFg
9diy
Sta.
Elev.
G.R.
T.W.
D.E.A. (,7od7?5• ) x .5
= E.A. (12-3q }
/30,td
/Y700
/7if �v
/S 4�?S
/.5la �
/4'7S� 2
/�1STf•;
oa
3sn
-}Loo
y
V,5-
y
336

voe
i
"Fya- I � ,

11-4-2 -enT g
ih
otg�
CZ<5;7
7y7ZZ-
0,�*, CL-cr
01;

Oo/
,-,, 's 0
CLle
0-13
CZ -4;
CZ -4;

i
C-W T--1
r fe-
7
41,