510127_PERMIT FILE_20171231

O Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservatism
_.._.._ _ ... _ . O Other Agency
Type of Visit ompliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit - Routine 0 Complaint O.Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: rival Time: Departure Time: County: RW�Region: 0
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: I r
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = 6 0 « Longitude: = ° ❑ i
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I_A ❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Daia Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
g/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes e ~ ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes -EI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo []NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Cl Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
l 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
t4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
O�/N' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`?
El Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
_VNo,
❑ NA
- ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name f Phone: — �1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:(az o
P-0 7 f ? I 1212R104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents ���--
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �I NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Ia No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22,
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes [2 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23,
if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ es ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ es ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes XNoo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes [;, 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes 4KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes Eno
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? i
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ZN
❑ NA
❑ NE
Adclrtional C rn nts,andlo>r Drawings m �'' ;>` g.;a� * + i `,` f'
A-1 , ♦ 1 G U i, ��d.
10 " p v p w0
d CkLof
LI-10T ©R +plovy
-
en f .
C
Page 3 of 3 V 1 1 12128104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection � Op ion Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complain Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: w Regio
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
35ab:2 IQ _e) — 9 9.
Swine
Design'
Capacity
'Current
P opulation
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
[
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
FJEEEs
❑ Boars
I_
C
Back-up Certification Number: _
Latitude: = ° = I 0 « Longitude: = °
Non -Layer
TMh
yHltry
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pou Its
Other
Cow
ow
Cy alf
y Heifer
Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood C
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
iml
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
S ture l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (i
Observed Freeboard (in
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ,E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes No
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ,( Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
(((VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
No
IIIIII
❑ NA
El NE
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
tiu:l Pi..Y:i:�� "�:-a.:�s i. is p" y.,:.$'� ..'k S':i.R.(.:'�d%5 ":#f•:l..iari''. '': �.A�t. �.:.'Re-S. !"'"/fL,S. 3:1 &
Comments(refer,toquestion #) ExplinstnyYESanswers grid/or anyrecoinmendationsorany other comments'
Use drawmgsaof facility.tobetter ezplahr situations: (qse additional pages as necessaryy):
...#ppy f. 1 _ _ y_ ;, �.. t 1-5> ♦ - 4.4A i,k Ai; �'�S'S .: _e ff ��r:i� 4Da -'lI -F{:9+S y,A11 �;-iai-.]s9
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ; Date:
Page 2 of 3 1 12128104 " Continued

• `w
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Desi n ❑ Ma s ❑Other
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes �No El NA El NE
6 p
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Applic tion ❑ Week y Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall Stocking 2rCrop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZN o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ElNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [IYes VN ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
No
[:3NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
-Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
41
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Add ith)"I C6minents and/or Drawings:."'
refit �' {, „
..
Ito
ll f D
h
i
Page 3 of 3 12128104

tivision of Water Quality
Facility Number , Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
�(271,`-a
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County:�Region:(?Rj)_
Farm Name:
c=��'
0 �AY
iw Owner Email:
_
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
i
Certified Operator: Rprizu
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude:
0 e
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: % 7 7617
Back-up Certification Number:
a Longitude: ❑ e = ' =
Design Current . Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer :��]: I .--d
TJ I ❑ Non -La et
RTr-
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: a
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes r f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes .IT No
❑ Yes _Q4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ;2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 6 —�� Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes -No
❑ Yes *No
Structure 5
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of an of t structures observed?ElElEl es No NA NE
� (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) /Ie "P­ ;
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed f Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? ftsm-6 04 v`
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? I �„n,h p��QUft-�-EEtTes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? v [ryes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [To ElNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes YJ No El NA El NE
maintenance/improvement? //
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ TotaI Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? • ❑ Yes 121 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes 'P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�' �/ f�.f.t�n ✓I(Y�Qt9�� � ll� i , Q,0 i�f- / /
}-t,Q�
4AftAj
164
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
If 12128104 Continued

J
Facility Number: Date of Inspection#Ur
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
stwu COC 31o(0.9161
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists b ❑ Maps
❑ Desi =n ❑Other
9/1 ,9/A"a
A��
21. Does record keeliiWned ovement? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ol,
ast�e ekl Freeboard rite a s
A�aa��rry y 5 - ly
Waste Transfers
El Annual Certification
;ala-infall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes )2j'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes �'To
❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? Q
❑ Yes
P"'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
)eNo
ElNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
ElYes
'�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
J
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
0
ElNA ElNE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
i�Q,tenM
066
t ,
1ooep - PAIU- 1,9 007(/�)
IIN
1
�_F�
12128104

L
f Visit 0Compllance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistancen for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint r°t Follow up 0 Referral %Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:"'f—Ff Arrival Time:Departure Time: County: Region:
Ll
Farm Name: C1t`1 tyl h 1:� (� ��� cn- Y"^ Owner Email: G 7
Owner Name: a I'�--h+' ,1'c�'"_-P_t-_ Phone:
Mailing Address: 1 LLT- �Ky�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e ❑ , = Longitude: = ° = ' =
Design Current
Design C►urrent
Design Current
Swine C►►opacity Nopulatien
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population
Cattle
C«opacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
ceder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
El Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
El Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turke PouIts
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No El NA El NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ['No
ElYes No
[I NA ❑NE
El NA El NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — 'Z Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 7'es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Cl Yes �No [I NA El NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): }
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes C ❑ ❑ No NA NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) lk
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes F1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? r
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? '`I'' Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �1No ❑ NA [3 NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) !
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1WNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
93 NE
U
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
E] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
a No
❑ NA NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
/Pk
P NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
'%NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES'answers and/or any recommendations or any -other' comments
,r+
..Use drawings of,facilityto better eiplam situations..(use additional pages as necessary): k
1
S'
Reviewer/inspector Name I q,Iy-_
--
° Phone: qCI
Z.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: GL`
Date:
d.
Page 2 of 3 � 12128104 Coptinued
�

Facility Number: —�� Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
PNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
P NE
23,
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
//❑NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
E1 NA
�NE
29,
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
El No
El NA
( E
pl�'
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30,
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
PNE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
��
`I o
❑ NA
*E
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
'{Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
�
�C'-
n e
y ` � �. �V,
l.:

Type of Visit ? Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit � Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 a Arrival Time: a Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �h`n �'�Cti�lr'+r✓� Owner Email:
Owner Name:a? v� Phone: Q I
Mailing Address: / _ uc3`Q _ lc-- rJl „ -, l GL'1"1 "� C �_ , Z c3
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: —" ` ��e ►'��` "_
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator: _ 4 1'\
Operator Certification Number -
Back -up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e Longitude: = ° 0 I = 4
Design Current
Swine C++opacity Population
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Design C*urrent
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
[:]Layer
❑ DairyCow
EI.Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
El Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
—LLJ,9b
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non-Dai
ElBeef Stocker
El Feeder
❑Beef Brood Cowl i
Number of Structures:
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �10 El NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes JA
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of ` 1ti. f`�Q� L� ���'^ c' 1 12128104 Continu
_r-,lU �n.W e 1<^\,1 �ri�

FacilityNumber: '— Z. Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1
Observed Freeboard (in): ZU
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
'�No
[]NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
l
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �INo El NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) //
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑l Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) V'JC' � Ce..c;.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [I NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes EPNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendatonstorQanyother comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):. 4�
VH
eqq
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Phone:
�-3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
-
Date: j Z
v io
Pa*ge�2 of 3 ` j 12128104 C tinu d

• Facility Number: Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ElNA ElNE
the appropriate box. ElWUp ElChecklists ElDesign [3 Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking P Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections P
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
E?-14No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
PNA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
1�3 NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
I No
YJNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
EpNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
ff
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
-FR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional:Comrnents andfor"D,rawings:--
C" jok �03
zO'VY" C z- �`1
L1F.�C'" L�I
C�� {��
.VQ_ a CA 1 1� 0n
s
�]f YI cs j
IDJA
G'_� A,4 �1 q, .
U �_U
M
P.-
Page 3 of 3 �� � ,� I2/28/04

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510127 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510127 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 01/09/2007 Entry Time:10:55 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Q1gan QQvette Farm
Owner: Glenn Boyette _..,.._
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 1387 Loop Rd Clayton NC 27527
Physical Address:
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Spring Meadow Farm Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'21" Longitude: 78°25'39"
SR 1708 north out of Clayton past the Neuse River and take first right and go to 1387 Loop Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts © Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Percy G Boyette Operator Certification Number: 17757
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 01/09/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
* The visit was a follow up to a call by Mr. Boyette to report a high freeboard on 1/8/07.
#4. Current level is at 18.5". Mr Boyette reported the level was at 19" as of yesterday but he had to empty his two pits that got it to the
current level.
* During the last inspection conducted on 1218/2006, the level was at 20". We have had about three heavy rainfall events in the past
one month since DWQ was here.
* Mr. Boyette says he has pumped within this past one month but did not have records available for review.
* Please submit all pumping, freeboard and rainfall records since the last inspection by January 26, 2007.
* The producer was given 30-day Plan of Action (POA) forms for High Freeboard to be completed and submitted to DWQ when levels
is drops below 18".
* Producer is repairing his pump to be ready for pumping as soon as weather conditions allow.
#7. Ground hog or rodent holes are yet to be filled. Will be attended to after the work on his pump.
#33. A follow up visit will still be required to assess the situation on the ground if wet weather continues.
* Please consult your technical specialist for any assistance such as the preparation of the Plan of Action to lower the lagoon back into
compliance, should the need arises.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette
Facility Number : 510127
Inspection Date: 01/09/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon 1 1:0
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette
Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 01/0912007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? " ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510127 Owner -Facility: Glenn Boyette
Inspection Date: 01/09/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 510127
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5 -
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ❑
❑ ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
Q ■
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑
❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

0
Permit: AW5510127 Owner - FaclIIty: Glenn Boyette Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 0110912007 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑ in
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette
Inspection Date: 01/09/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 510127
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510127 Facility Status: Active Permit: Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnstan Region: Raljah
Date of Visit: J 21OW2-- 008 Entry Time:G9:2Q,AM_ Exit Time: Incident M
Farm Name: Glenn Boyette Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
Lrmwj!.. ...m. e]ISM iO i1►[�YXL-fix
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latltudw.35°40'21" Longitude:78"25'39"
SR 1708 north out of Clayton past the Neuse River and take first right and go to 1387 Loop Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Appiication
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Percy G Boyette Operator Certification Number: 17757
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamf Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510127 Owner -Facility: Glenn Boyette
Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 12/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stocking & mortality records in hog house
• Waste analysis:
Waste sample sent to Raleigh
7112/06 = 1.2
3f7/06 = 1.2
" Soil sample sent to lab in November 2006, - Please follow recommendations on lime requirements
#7 Need to fill ground hog holes, mow lagoon wall to allow grass to grow
* WUP dated 10/1/2003
* Permit received on 4/6/2006, available on site, COC at home.
* Will be required to do sludge survey and irrigation calibration within 2yrs of date of COC.
Reviewed waste application records, complete and balanced,
21, Lagoon freeboard levels & rainfall recorded
(a) Missing a couple of lagoon levels in 2006.
(b) Levels reached 19" on 2/14/2006 and 2/18/2006. Per permit condition, you are required to notify DWQ any time lagoon levels is
less than 19" and submit Plan of Action (POA) to bring it back into compliance within 30 days.
(c) Required to inspect lagoon after rainfall event greater than or equal to 1 ", and place your intials against them.
21. Required to keep records of crop yields of crops harvested from fields that receive animal waste
" Producer to lower lagoon going into winter months.**
' Producer given new IRR2 and CROP-1 forms.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number : 510127
Inspection Date: 12/08/2006 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,480 2,480
Total Design Capacity: 2,480
Total SSLW: 334,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 20.00
Page; 3

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number: 510127
Inspectlon Date: 12/08/2006 Inspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette
Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 12/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Cecil
Soil Type 3
Faceville
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑. ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette
Facility Number : 510127
Inspection Bate. 12/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections? .
❑
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑ ■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑ ■
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number : 510127
inspection Date: 12/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

I
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510127 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510127 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Onerations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 03/15/2006 EntryTime:M- O AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Glenn Boyette Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1387_LQ2UM Clayton NC 27527
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°40'21" Longitude:78°25'39"
SR 1708 north out of Clayton past the Neuse River and take first right and go to 1387 Loop Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment . Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Percy G Boyette Operator Certification Number: 17757
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Glenn Boyette Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Glenn Boyette Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Permit AWI expired in 2005, application for renewal has been submitted and contacted P.Sherman for current status; in-house review
expecting renewal shortly. Will not be AWI or NPDES (population under 2500). Producer stongly advised to read permit carefully
upon receipt and question any conditions not acceptable or fully understood. Likely to include additional record keeping requirements
including sludge survey and irrigation equipment calibration.
7) Several ground hog holes (at least five), but do not appear active. All along upper side behind houses. Advised to repair to at least
make observation of new damage more readily evident. Strongly advised to mow regularly especially around pump. Cannot properly
inspect lines (flex line/hose particularly vunerable to damage/leakage).
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510127 Owner -Facility: Glenn Boyette
Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 03/15/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aqoon 1 22.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number : 510127
Inspection Date: 03/15/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
MOO
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
01111
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
.7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
M
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

N
Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number : 510127
Inspection Date: 03/15/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application - Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

4
Permit: AWS510127 Owner -Facility: Glenn 6oyette Facility Number : 510127
Inspection Date: 03/15/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
Cl
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510127 Owner -Facility: Glenn Boyette
Inspection Date: 03/15/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number : 510127
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette
Inspection date: 03/15/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 510127
Reason for Visit: Routine
Technical Assistance
Needed
Provided
34. Waste plan revision or amendment
❑
❑
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
❑
36. Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
❑
❑
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
38. Missing components (list in comments)
❑
❑
39. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
40, Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
42. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
❑
45. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
❑
48. Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
❑
49. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
50. Site evaluation
❑
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
52. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
53. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
54. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
57. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
58. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
❑
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
62. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
64. Waste operator education
❑
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
❑
67. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
69. PLAT Assessment
❑
❑
70. Other
❑
❑
Page: 7

Permit: AWS510127 Owner - Facility: Glenn Boyette Facility Number: 510127
Inspection Date: 03115t2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
List Improvements made by Operation
Improvement 1
Improvement 2
Improvement 3
Improvement 4
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Page: 8

2
(Type of Visit ;O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit - 'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Arrival'I'irne: Departure Time: County: s. ,61A_4S1`� •^' Region: `�-�$
Owner Email: V- �'}' �, d C_
Prone: z
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Phone No: ]
Integrator: A 7 �3r `•✓
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 c =,
= Longitude: = ° 0 I 0 11
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
- eederto Finish
1Z
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers -
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Daity Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Caw
Number of Structures: EJI
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

a
Facility Number:) — rZ Date of Inspection 1
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA�tll4?readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriatebox below. ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Applic on ElWeekly F/board ❑ Wallhnalysis ElSoil AnalA'Pr ElWaste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,o [I NA El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ;? I{NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes Ej'�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes �ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes fi2No
ElNA
ElNE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes 'hfo
El;l
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional C mments a', &!& 9Drawings „ ar
1 J ♦�
CIA '►»
J.A,r-14k P4:f'�p�i'6' t PS SFv_L^t�tz.
t
12128104

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): "Z %
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuetures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes V(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wjiud Drift El Application Outside of Area
Z7g S'
12. Crop type(s) G
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[] Yes 'P3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [Y"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 5/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i�W✓. �^`� I�.ti �' .A. W° '. li - � 'd.}-1 '�'` 3 � ""�..A. �'E' b l
Comments { efer to question #) ; �)Jxptain any YYESranswers=andlor annyxrecommendations or any other comments.
Use draw�ngsof�facility�tobetterexptum sil'attons (usedditional�pages as4necessarPy,),, .
Reviewer/Inspector Name J p; ,f ; t r nPhone: ? I Z
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

- Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 'i Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency d•
Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
O Routine O Complaint
O Follow up O Referral O Emergency
Eother ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: E,61 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: +� �a �-�� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: __G'Ifrr�r� 1307L S __ Title:
Onsite Representative: 6"4j Bo "fyl�i'
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
10
Swine
Phone: G 6 62 :z !w
Phone No:
Integrator: 1ta.di.1
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = { = Longitude: = ° ❑ 1 ❑
gi
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
i J❑ Layer
E1 Non-Layet
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 1-2,q
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other — - - — — -----�
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dai Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures: El
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes I.,d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ICJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 3uv
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1 677
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA [IN E
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ,YJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground . ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
S) o 0_J if Fcf- s: vC Z f,44'jD 00%A SE 51
r. SAC D `« C� si �Pso t✓ �'tA C S E 1111 p t.J�, r1 CGP 'CQ rr o'-j
ReviewerlInspector Name ,,
#,� Phone: �1� ..s�/ (LZO0
ReviewerlInspector Signature: fj Date: 3 t7 5 X
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S1 — Z, Date of Inspection / o
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[I No
❑ NA
[I NE
the appropirate box. ElWUP El Checklists El Design' El Maps ❑Other
21,
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste•Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes,eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23,
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
(I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additionat problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Ql4d66O11R1 Cp111me1ti5n{I/OrDraHt11S
1 S) � �,9,3 c, sz t a - GJD s To _cj O-A
C_,o 4.0 %, "r a -S 0"-L Q1 Lrj -
Ca l z X7 GU ' 0ArJCf, Toy A-T_
FbTt-
1� SJ (✓1✓� C�`1<�"'f�l-a J.it�+�t�y /��..mo�AC. �r�La��� � �
o.t fl LPL �, LA a U L C� i , £ L L 4 Cr
12128104

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation i
Reason,for Visit fd Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z Date of Visit: I l d �`# Time:
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
PIfermitted OCertified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
FarmName: t.........t;."r.,:n\iF...R�.`..\.......................................... County:........................................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.............IG? .. ...................................................
Mailing Address: ..... 1. 7.... °`...ry�................................. I ........... I .............. 1... . S 5 3 .....4
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:....................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �L �s�l 7 � � Integrator:....�!!�.4.�-�'ky`5 ...��t '?. ! !. � .........................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude ' 4 «
Discharges & Stream lml2acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ONo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes JZNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ;2(No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes (�'No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J"No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes VIM
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: $ — j'Z Date of Inspection jt
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [lo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes "No
closure plan?
{If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes IN 0
elevation markings?
Waste Anolication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
p' o
11.
Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Fes
.No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
27 T if-- S_ is
12.
Crop type [_, 'i3 ;Fj2^ %J fl A Z5-6 to %c_
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
;$io
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
j No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 7Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
1$. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? trl qz_ s�.aT„� _ ❑ Yes 12 l�o
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �'No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
PA . � ..,. > ;."A
: ^is::» s�rr, ,.�.. .. � ;;• y;htea r - . 'i L:%I�:c , � u , st y, u rr t� r a,. .,z a' .v r t::yc:r ,dn3r r
;comments {refer.to queiWon #) REx'OWiiiany YES,answers andlbr, any recammendattons or,any'otber, comments r; ., a , i � l -N
;Use _ wingskot-1geMly�to,better "plarn situati ns {use addiuonal a".es as�nec�essa � n � i- �.� l .s
P S rx) geld Copy Final Notes
w: R a ir.�f.��w � _ mil. `s i9� ��t4utt:_.1:�:�W � �_=.dam.. iifi�MV1.!'.Trh a,:1'rs"71?
Reviewer/Inspector Name '�yF¢XJq 3�1`{� v5.l�r Ai T1r� 9 �y .tt I����tiii y :� �I
i.'AL ��..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t t Cjq
17i77inq rants ,..od

Facility Number: S 1 -, t Z Date of Inspection u
Re uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily av llabl
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
toji\v3
23. Does record keeping need impro ment? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Waste" Application ❑ Feboard ❑ Waste Analysis Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable Aback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did, the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
f
26. Fail.to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did,Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
3I. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes JC;�1Qo
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes Ta401",
❑ Yes'123No
❑ Yes <o
❑ YesoNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Stocking Farm ❑ Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
A LLX J r % Z-5a
t cC.,
2.-5
;a AvU-
P�R�.�S L,4sr airD 'TiAUi 1ktE4
W fit r�s .c.^.c=R-� s� �'•► `� :' 1'1 C: S P�P�£- -
w.A-� ►1; 6�k� ��� 1
.._ 1 r+ s ��c�.roa— �:�' �►�C.�F-- ea 5 t`P�:.�L a F 1'��e*�: � 4�c�*1 A�� i eJ
f; j ��.
�� ' �` •� rt� :►tea J�Z t�►4
sE
nn.1 S c
�. C' 'so.- T� l�l lr.� �+! � — wF rt J+ t3 S -+JET a �J
12112103

Type of Visit ,0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit C) Routine O Complaint /5"Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number SI / % Date of Visit: 3� Time:
Not O
�/ erational Below Threshold
,permuted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 53L2Z 9County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 6L£xj-1 Z ay z✓7'r>; Integrator: 2 _ or C _ T
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 if Longitude 0 1 44
Design
Current Design'Current Design Current
Swine- Capacity
Population Poultr Capacity Po"'�ulationCattle. Ca faci ' Population
❑ W n to Feeder
❑ La er ❑ Dairy
eeder to Finish -
❑ Non -La er �� ❑Non-Dai
Ll Farrow to Wean
❑ Other " ....:-'
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total
p
NumbcrEof Lagoons
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area ,
al
r yHoldmg Ponds / Sohd Traps,a
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
,r,,.
a �
Discharims &c Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;YNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway P/Yes ElNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 tructure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: S f — 2 Date of Inspection °
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 2J Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ AUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge`?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
,KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refeir totq st n )'{'Eatplain any YES answers anUrtany recommendations or any othericomymetits �'"
Use drawings ofla�ility to,better explain sihtations. (use additionil pagesias necessary).;;"ietd Copv ❑ Final Notes y.
C'a"rj"4-CjT Or— nA At~.r_� .�J/-t--IQ
AL
Ly) p> ojc4,a_ +JD7 1ZEP1J,eV_
��'� lf✓11�i�+S �+c5 fEt:� / rN�ucO r3� ti7vc� �$SAt°.
C (sC AU G�P-- .S f IZI r 1 C AIALI
Reviewer/Inspector Name r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: w.. Date: 5 3 c� 3
05103101 % Continued

Dlivision of Water Qual
DiVtSion of SolUandi"�atel<�onservatioll
MUM
#
!(Syher
i
�r41ari4iF!i!885i!&=Ad4itXEP31�t��!�i�ri{f!t}�'.Wliii��i��
sI 4i133iI R�ti�i !! Hii[4a-$ i YB6&±8..��.
' . 3 i
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 05/30/2003 Time: 14:00
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................... -
Farm Name: Glenn Boyette Farm County: Johnatan ........................................... RRO ............
Owner Name: Glenn Boyette
Mailing Address: 13,87.Laapt.Rd.............................................
FacilityContact: ...........................................................................
Onsite Representative: Glenn.B:ayebte.................................
Certified Operator: P.erry...G. ............................... Royette...
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 5534094
.........................................I Claylom... C........................................................... Z7520 ..............
...Title: ............................................................... Phone No: .669-2591.................................
......................................... Integrator: Rrown!..s.n£.Ca .olina,.Inc..................................
.... Operator Certification Number:1.7.757 ...................... I......
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©• ®6 " Longitude e ©4 ®6C
0 {�.
, I, [j{yf 3" ;°,
3 " i3i{{;1 iiif
2 3'!
d i[ , -..i. {{ttte- (93 5 l3 °[II{P�P<°,11
j ...E �Swine�, {<EiC!eaE i!g E!' it li,ieE
(y(fiCatlac>Ity;
f at< ... ,.,.,.,E.if i[.'it ............ ,.
C
l,tl.'.DeSt nE[E[4[ [' Surrent,i!i�
.g. ,E.i jij£1�i�i.
• I:+E E.t <[3LEE.,§::i:1g�
i.. ,E!i,..,k. E... l:E�.zfa •�i.�.I�,
Populatlon
...,�...t sE''E [Ei .<..Y°{eQtYGY., ., [i'. ; - ..,...,...... ... .;.,E..� 9 $ 3 14!S' yyi f f 1 g°i•�' :' 4.SIi.,,
{ . , }(( ;.! ;!, tt,[{{[[ i.E €1s e 3p- :i iDesrQn" E[j i 'current; i• I,e.3 ,Pit !E� (�.�II iy, ! E i ;� 3 i� ,!,,Desi n,ibi�!,, .Current
tF'I.`.C..Bd,...;a?:: .. R7 .3.E Ej j(yj 33b 39S �3. i.13 j3 g.,
}i. �.�j!$j, f.iS�s1 E.�E�EE<{j!t 3 [{1�Ef!IB �{EI ts,{
ii Po Yltr E P€ ;{'};}. i,}[.a}3,.ztE• kflis 3�E�. F� 3if •3;.,.3E±B'�3BE`! attle'� �:!€<. }Se �8 f3. .,,�Pa� , 3
Y €}.t:€E,g!, i @apacityliPopulahon;,3 d�,,EPa3FE!3ff„=;,,=i,IIiIII,���ndF�Capactty Population
i !3 aLS.i§MIVB UNH ,:VI'No A;i;,,,,.i,E
❑ can to Feeder
�Y
`, ® Feeder to ims
,p ,����
i , 3 .>,
117f3>ll,li.3f.:fms.f:., ..€..['?€.€iaa.�e., Ea"{�., „E3j��E3 ! i,
+
;I. ❑ ayer ❑ aIry
❑ Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
!t arrow to can
!
Farrow to Fee er
❑
; Other a tt ii !i
❑ {d]!{"1tt d # E Els,!
i ! l jj{)F)�}}� 33j E d..:�f.E�!iE.,
: Farrow to Finish
,i� ❑
1 {`I
k91�1�i�L�i!i�ti ��
€}!,':4<!.t , �I ?
�otaliDes>ign;Cap,acEtty,, 2,560
E ❑Giltsi:•,
{
}€€ E{y Q i(}(}(( i i lq
1 �i.EE!!p€i 6 [ � id � �qj�"'i si�€� � }i�i�� !� � �lil� ��,'' t 3333 333 33 11 {{€E}}E55{{ FF €Ej jQ[pp 5 €(}(}((PP€ EE9E{(@ j{ q ia° .. Eta lit, i3. fe !€{P k
€t!I@i �E °e 3i333 t ii:: iY�Ef1 F jEES i� f EE itF3ii r Ee} € E
i }{qq„11111E;') IIII[[ Tnta1SSL[W 345 600:
;. €€{ €. �q t #1, # " E,
❑Boars
Ifh. S
�{�,�!,-.:.i,[.,:u[.<...[..w...n3r.,...,e.e.e,.,..[,.a...[..,...•.,[
......................... [.u.e.
i.+is...i..s..i.... [..,.,....,.,
ai £ E7� �� a € E €t 1 1
i f t F 3 a4:.E xll'l�'!,Ite333e,i,9, �
{( 3p� t. E: 44{4 j€{€j j[ E((p ¢E6 yEai 9Be of 9P>} j iYii3�iy, {jpp 7jj < B iII e7 i jj(3jj7
��5, if i3.:f�E§f!{EIFit�PiiB!EiB!1iP31iB8i>�93�I�iaia'i313aiEi��t37 ilYi}i�ii�s.Y.�.�Lf!.[�;Ci �.3�33�9:iQ,!34SfSr'F�3,����fiii
g�d
�IloldingmPon'ds
����
; •��
o_sugrnaceDrains PresentLagoon rea p pray ie � �a Lr6,�fF
/ Soli s
Trapmo
a a System
Discharges & Strea Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
................................... ...
Freeboard (inches):................16....................
05103101
Continued

* �05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 51-127 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes ❑ No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 0 Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? []Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ® Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Cl Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
p Yes []No
p Yes []No
Ig Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cam°rn°'eri'f`s',"r'efe"r':,#t© uestion # �" Ez'la ari"aIGES answers a'ndlor' arirecommendationeSNg0jr1kn "otlie� 'commentsti,!i! �P N.i�! �NiNL,ilPl,d�lf�:l� juse drawmgs.of�facility to better explain situations. (useadditi°nalpages-as necessary):eld Co Final Notes PY ❑
Lagoon at 16 inches; determined by contact with the arm of the marker with a piece of aluminum pipe (two inch with coupling on
end) against the perpendicular high liquid level marker. Producer indicates that two of the pits were empty (he would not show me the
its from inside the houses). However, design indicates lagoon surface of 71400sgft. (1.64ac=44,508 * 3 in = 133,525 gal) and house
dimensions of(129'*45'* 2.5'(avg.depth assumed)*2 houses* 7.48gallcu.ft= 29,025ga1.).
22) Producer failed to notify DWQ regional office of the high freeboard.
14) Wettable Acres pending when new irrigation system installed.
15) Rye cover crop remains on field 1 C.Bermuda field. Mr. Boyette informed that crop cover removal date per guidance is intended to
e by April 7. Very poor stand of C.Bermuda grasses per this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name John!N H> rit , 3' t s,,'€ ]wp'€t' ,, ! €�;���;a,r E� �zi,iE,r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Type of Visit eoO Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number l Date of Visit: S 3 b 1iMe:
Nat O erational Beio Threshold
'01'P�ermitted Wertified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: r'1 _F,'L'j County: _ vJgF 4 S, -F,_f
Owner Name: Phone No: rila Z 1 C F 1_9
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: j Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �+ 3d E� Integrator: Rp,o tr►WS a r-
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 000� ��� Longitude • 04 •6
Design Current Design Current Design - Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle CUPaCitV POIDUIRtiOn
❑ Wean to Feeder 1 10 Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
I Number of Lagoons ILI Subsurface Drains Present JILI Lagoon Area ILlSpray Field Area 1
Hold�ngPonds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Slate? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
051033101
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes lJ o
❑ Yes
❑ -151
Yes9N,
ElYes
❑. Ycs 'P ""
Structure b
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection ES/13/63
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
i6Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 'P3 No
Waste ",plication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
P_Njo
12. Crop type G , t3ee4kQpR+- S. Ga.�,`,.,( 9IsCC— Fj"Af blt2 f CIP4l
_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
�No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Ye N
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
es
eNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
r�Yes
Required Record&Documents //-70 ZI !
Zrz .T a -�y
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Geher l Permit or Permit read? ayailCa�
❑ Yes
y r �7 �!
o
18. Does the facility fail to have ali components of the Certifih'�'Znimal.Waty&p gement Plan readily available?
❑
❑
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Z ;boy 6,11
Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, aste analysis soil samp ereports s ��
El Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design. t1""`I� G
❑ Yes
21"No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
E3No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Q-<
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
wers and/or^anyrecommendations or any other comments.
Comments ( eferta question #) Explain an YES a1selad
Use drawings ofdfacility to better":explain situatlons. {itionalpages 'as necessary). ''��''y��.,,. , -.- x ji ield Copy ❑ Final Notes
Qccta-c>r MAL, it, +t 3a­l00► IbAL-
ZODZ froV 16, Lz, 23 Z70, fDa c,�dC,
eCA-Ak- t` CAa1)t'r,.,j,d f 5 Secs F:ES' i-CC-+0-ps e...tsr 71. tzer r-, to _,% r eAf-S
F'4- ,tn4J Arj Pzz9&xa &sA�Ir3 -P—tfa✓ 7 Szraq d jv— 7WJ2 ra Morr;�l6—
'9,j
2_ TP t` NziO -roREspa °c�6 iftrkT t4�#:!< 'AA'AAp gQL'Z £r '44_L-�E ��Sr L.fl1
Reviewer/Inspector Name �- ,.. J.� i��,-}T� V� `< 71
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 70D Date: S ;6L3
05103101 1 1 Continued

Facility Number: S ( - I Z Date of Inspection �3
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [2rNo
❑ Yes R<O
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes zo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Additiooal,Comments,AAdlor Drawings:
2-6} &J c r! Gt¢. �€CJ v•`Q-gyp S� 7�%✓_ A,`,e
? ¢ a9 JG la A fl 41 4 � PioA�D t A
�'o
'Ft?g-%SR-b Lo G
LgAS';1=
c.�u-" T` W h,Vr LAM OC"r Bc
�_" S� (MAY ,� 3
1S) Gn ¢�E Ft4A--T- S A--, &-r 'iAE C-F" 4 tP 'T-bdL '}-.v.o n1T'4
4,F nr s 3 C ut.�r� Nt l •4 S_,4. P. 't`o
T;4
Zzti)
/ 23
W/�SrE s4vopC E S $fF--6/0Z�
05103101

Facility Number r Date or visit: 3 'Time: = Zo
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified Q Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: GLk r'j a . County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: —
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 " Longitude 0 6 «
Discharues & Stream lmuacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. ll'discharge is observed, what is the estimated Clow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
WajtL!LRIIccti2n & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 1
05103101 Continued

Ali
��
r lvlston of Water Qnallty * � , r, .g, x G ry 0
o �a R T
.,Eni; be d:a- a 1.3 d i 9€ visa( ,.a-"¢ a•E !sl L93` %+,p °E. f,d £EE.g€l•�:.va.["
i ,]Q .p�lsitn Of Sell Snd iWster Conservalip>oa{ ¢ . 8yy° € z33d % �eai , "'9° f}
Jy.., F ,•., `� v S ',k,. ¢ sE ry f ri E...d 3 # le
E _,. 'Lf£ zi f:V• rs ?l'I ", ,Tit E i` t EEC.. f (d' i . ,ds£ rPK
,.'.4 F'--,.` rA t-r"K a. n.
N Other"A"gency.&�
r .: .r - ,, 1 €T_ .. _.. .. ... _. ;�' .# 3 1 w ' •e zs °,n .�� r.i i i +!. ��' :°•ra'q
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit .Routine O Comp�laaiintt O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other El Denied Access
Facility Number �'"'1 rT Date of Visit: :� Vr 'ime:
Not O erational Below Threshold
12termitted CKertified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: � t.-�..? •.� a�t�.[f� � A � _ County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: 'Title: Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: Integrator: L' �i7-�► %
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 0. 0" Longitude
Design . Current Design ;Current . 3 Design Current
Swine :..< ,' Ganacitr'" I'oetilshon„ei1Po`ulfii`y'.!° .11..Catiactty. P06111ation,ff, ,Gi'.'s...r'Caoarity I;iPonuiahon .
Feeder to Finish �.
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
t ❑ Boars
']!i Number of Lagoons C
Holdtng:Ponds°I=Soliil Traps 1 ' �'
ILA Other
,Total Iiesi1,
tE i
et iIS}°:
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
�! 3 x ❑ No Liouid Waste Managen
u a�ae�
❑ Non-Dai
i • i 11 '
3 i
:a LJ Spray Field Area P
+'
fr
ji
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste C21Iec1i9n && Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes la No
❑ Yes 5 No
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ Yes,
NNo
Elie? Yes
No
❑ Yes
ONo
Structure 6
Continued

R
Facility Number: .S j — 1`Z 7 Date of Inspection *
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A1112lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Z bsr 12. Crop type 1 - �, t: � ;
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those dsignated in the Certified Animal Waste M agement an AWN
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents , r�o, ►o �-
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Genera P t Ur�rmit readily available?
(01 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Cdrtifi6d Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Z( 1 - - (4
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri0fi on, fife-kard, waste analysis & soil sa4ll4ports), , os ZM2,
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes IzNo
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes z
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ;2No
❑ Yes info
❑ Yes Zlo
❑ Yes ,rJ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2&o
[--]Yes cj'lqo
❑ Yes ,2TNo
❑ Yes J2'No
❑ Yes ,,,QNN�o
El Yes 2<0
❑ Yes Fl o
❑ Yes �o
�
❑ Yes�_,I/No
El Yes ICJ No
❑ Yes Iu No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.. : „ Y,a ..:. .¢.:.�e; , . -°�_ .l �f....<i:°r; <, ,.e�->.h€€rn3.3;3.e,3? "FPr.c.I , , �a::� ,.;€r ..>,�
Comments (refer,to,guestion'#) �IlExplain anytYES answers and/or'tty<recommendations;ar anv,outer comments.'> %: ,,,g"'€
r. - 3. _
E,se drawttts olrfactltty to better explain stttaattons! (use additional pages as necessary) 1 , a'¢ Field Copv r❑ Final Notes
HH
iT'
fw� C SEt.K j>+4- .rC"r" 733— 8oz16
A1F5-� l b (:AIJ"C'R.a•� 'v'fE�s '�� C�E''Y 1��`S�
u.J:�� rC��`5•.1 , C.. S�[?aM �?r71� i\��L.�CA�'�o•+� t,,w:�.i'G�t�
f-C.�-.(3o�t� C�oiSLT crJ'r'�
=�uS so`��rkc� MAC B>✓ -r-wz- RT�ti�fE._
w
Reviewerllnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r3 ti 2r
05103101 1 1 Continued

Facility lumber: $ —I Z 7 Date of Inspection
Q.[Lor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 6.0
28. Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. ❑ Yes LJ do
roads. building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes L No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.) ❑Yes eVo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes O,No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ��o
Additional Comments-andlor!Drawinps:
I J .
05103101

, ""'" a
visiou of Water ualit @ ' �F� I€�" {
Q �
Division of Sail and Water Conseryon
atl
thy
@i
e
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 5/i3/2001 Time: 4:OD
p Not Operationalp Below Threshold
E Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Glenn Boyette Farm County:,Fabutan............................................ RRO............
Owner Name: Glenn Boyette Phone No: 5534094
MailingAddress:.13,87..Loop.Rd........................................................................................ Claytoin... 1NC........................................................... 7.752ia......... .....
Facility Contact: ................... .Title: .. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Glenn.Bayrtte............................................................................ Integrator: Carroll's.Fonds,.Iae.....................................
Certified Operator: Derr,IRerU ...................................... Roy.ette ............................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.757 ............................
Location of Farm:
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ®b ®« Longitude ®• ©4 ®«
❑ can to Feeder
® Feeder to mis
p arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes Cl No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ................2Q..................................................................................................................................................................................................
05103101 Continued

03103101 Continued
Facility Number: S1 _ 127 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
® Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
[]Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Wastg Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Small Grain Overseed strawberries pumpkins sweet corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
H No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
H No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
rd
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
H No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
"Comments re"fe`r"�to �uesEioa # s Ez""lain aii"' YES'ansi=es a'riilor ati°"I°r`,a"coiiriirieriilationstor'an""Eler c mments. l �m ';•
LTse�drawingsnflfacilitytnbetteyyr�yex9gplac;m situagti�got�nspp,��(u�e'sdl.[taEn�galipagesat}s;fin{ecessgany.)3`
FieldFinalNotes
l�ilIt!�t9� lN�ibEi{r3 Copy
5) One notable ground hog hole; should be repaired. Check for damage regularly.
Kudzu is not an adequate cover for a lagoon. A vegetative cover with a suitable root system is required. This has been addressed in past
inspections and operation reviews. Thus a Notice of Violation is in order to see that the issue of vegetation is adequately addressed.
9) Recommended to utilize the marker most recently installed by Carroll's Foods, Inc. for obtaining more accurate freeboard readings.
19) Inspector requests that copy of freeboard logs (since operation was permitted in 2000) to be faxed as only 2001 available this visit.
There are questions of volumes land applied and the freeboard did not appear to fluctuate in accordance with pumping dates (specificall
in March 2001). [for rainfall at NCSU Central Crops Research Station - www.ne.climate.edu (site map to "Clayton").
Inspector to mail copy of form to change registration for integrator.
Reviewer/Ins ector Name a ! s :, + #' 6€ i i?1,
P JohnEN HunE{ �°� y a�� 1 �, § , ,�j [� ,� �'�°>:;$3;3 `r.!`;igE ""i�i.�,,. t�� ��� .
1 > > ...� s - �e�.E,nnwu:E>C= �i-`.,63 .e,$ @ k63 �+P._ 7.9.3;!'Cr I:.�: F EE 1� I {F i� '!� �Ie E347 a�c�. , t ,� S - `�E"I 1"Ifi,�,._ fit. ".r{',S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 51 _127 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 5/14/2001
�r Ima
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 0 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes ® No
},° ° ` i t r 'i€ €i` 3°'. -''t
%a lit p ii : '3 s �a t'E: x r,
'ddrY' r4�9 a:..l� ---a� ��3�i Iky,.ii,
§a€'S
°err II t A pr
k,,4.4-::�$€ rori. {s an 1 p F"t�,y € s { ',
k Y .9 a r `N i4 I {.:: E C?t la is F' ,r Stl c , . w1 4� k 9 1 $ Al"IE;e¢( I1g,
! pr„ rIt .:F ,, I�1` .: It E �d
r a E, Err,- s g@ ¢<id p y..:6 g. , ?i (_ .q, 1 i X $Ei a":.''i9 i! ti !� a . 8g` 1 , ..e, a z € r,-
p t ili °. a ° i n . R ,€ :{ rt't g : ai
i, t°s a li€ , "Olt € e .�9 ° r (., rS i i , •� <a> li}}
t I0 1.._.;4- 1„ :Sa lslj S, BB ,j IS>:t trr 4itg tag" e }' v r- 3 $i 1 , y a ° 8•. S dEI' ;, S' SiY::r�.a 1{' :(!x„ 3 .aSa 9
4 € ��s, ;.sa° , r$ tr€ s� t :! ; 1 °r6 Ill
1 I:1,4 9°%; t qt�a!',,:a �jal,g
a
1I
�4 1
'91'IY�i�rr''kz+ni!
Ik, Aa s{ °f: aY r 1 �•[ -.1 f , ` (':$ F 1 i € •rE 6d ' e -
I M[ t k' ;X 1� a I ; � pg§ ii§yr Y,€• Y t R `pia. ,y
.. w
i
t r
I: z 'i " ' t �� a. tlrBi.E a, . q � p, i.o. i £1: J j,Y F °r k¢�d� ¢$ a.. ¢ yp� d �.. ._. �.: - t t E 3. 1 .Yi S � i )� 1 j�,4 e �,: a a' : €" �#1 E.:,t •'4 ._iY? , 4g 4 .
s €:
z w t dly�jg
i. I
:ii'.r 11 asra9a :€ a li l :t+ibi <-$ri +a§lgi
t Eet � :.> 9 9 € ' '° t . d 'iW i .,,t 1 % i 1 f §r .,
c Y $rka r . , 1i {Iryy{ AS F I a� i
I ;y '�'$r rt k a t a 41,,§,.t,ry�k+il} �.`IY'1 ,! �f§,.. ?r JINF ��+A, k r $ri INtiL�,l}ys:
y y i. �'I rl rc 1 A
r4 ult
ai th Itr' 1 +} ry .;;s frRd 4t �r r i3rlrw�a }161r' �1 ik#}tl�['i�f,la tt r
j:,F..,q}�$c{-
SPIE ((a{{N; d-3S,aF. li 1. _:i31:,. _.tl.$_,-'%t= a; 3 .{ Pq( dP iq[a'j::3,:1.I1�41:......9..
Sg O, @_B a6,a..6tgg�cc. j€IE - a. : .... i r 1 7E� e tl C 33 f i ..0 �f t6 9 'd a P 3 4i ' '6': 3€:..{s 99 f�{ d<e r gl. aFaB§B8 6ia 9ga £{d6 �6,
l a;atl :a .t6(s¢` '''€:l 'Sl k } 1. Fiic g : " 1 $. • . , i113
� , ::fit; f, �€€€�! h;� � 1 a: �,px � ,§ � o t s €�. 7�1 .. �:: t 9j � `p� € �l; :. irr. :l; ig 1¢i ag @g$ ., ...
XS ti r„j 3 '1 isarR.-'3.:.y.a ° € ,,r 1' $:s4N `8�g4 r . °,6e ",gti id ; .:.. {° l 5.:: 6 :.: a. �{t@q ,a} t3 a g3 y:� fl-j:... §€ IgBg°B�a ., r . €s d: € > .7 i i°� Si g r x S . ?t €
a.tr €{n �'.�' i-`v',y{� _] _ 13 's,Ygj�9, a9[�€r E -Q3. i1 4d 4�t j] d"it.... �.}i':S7 drtd6=t$ €1 �jS'jr_=:=.. i Fitl € ::,:fl + __� "; )]A �i..:'t] r }�
1 " ' N?ii@ 3"Sa �.1€I!i��:: I S 11 ;p, r';. i e i4 f.: -
f i r ht ii X fl j l g I If 1 ; r : r l r +.
I r.Gi ry Surdkl } ){i,ar ;,.idSli�Jzij F'.t t ;
" 4 'a + i , §St { t dt+���j� JIdtrd� "a"•, r "P7 +§rI<I N'# 111',�I�d
p u t"{ '['v ai ``"R'm 1 €t f r n
°# L iS,e k f" t4 f•.,.71 + $"# i' +1 i �{,§ :d X''.PrtlSl F{1r ;1 ' I",}J tlt'"IS Xt ul§ - ,1 T ..
tld ¢ 1:€rt r{li a tz E id
h r'},^ { F r ;,L� @ E'r+ € r x} i`t, g `g�� t # a € 14 a •>t'Stt` i ##! Et I� { g, r a.a €P
sg, °:�.,s 9k I. ,d
X°'art; .:.E, 4. �So... � :i::.". �< Y a a .. Is
5�di:; :: � , .. ,}¢j5 fS @gE$@� �. r ,§@� i� �: E _ , a € �$i$t � Ega ,;�..q,. . , , a,s@: r 3rip ,,, a . 9plg
.,y� ° �1�ii °EEdFR( e. B !} P.�.. .; .� lrsjrx �e a S qpa d j { pe[88� E i € i � :�9� Itl§ 3§f i p$ 3�
{ {i gg .59�"r3� .s> z<a yp• '.RS��y
v :' 1.
,a, f dr� �ts S �3 # Cx iit11 "d`€�'te�,, � �al � ��4- � 9IE�-°'S ''a€97@3#sd8. i.�l�#ri�v}{ 115�.::rEri�.+9•a"�xEr� ��?"��fiF--ry@d}'� { i_. {SSf.9i� lt��,�., -9ryt':
$ < : CJ 1 d a klz i"i aid4 1{ g is t „'
a a 'u' 1 i H+ i' r '?• l I '� t' Fr} 4. 7
dtla
V. k r"4 M a( §p
rF";.:1 11 M,a',1 L 1a,� ark,:.s•.- Ery;r ll. i.-Vtp:.ta,7 ��{ii'[iYl>I'.'{�"r"`+4r '!'r �`�lt ,t t9kii"rs`{itV#'aX'r+�•�td,a!',':':
Y
: ars'dt."S •� .' r t f € r@ d 't._
ilVi t .f l.,s-lEi;! + r ! a +S 'kal, hr
pp � ¢¢
,. ?.
:. i _.... a a :-r= . € a'i l -
tlX a ' : s , ;di i a :a§.=„ ) 6(gg a- [[ p rEE]]ddr, p !Slit :r a @{{ ti 3 S ..a.
4 r, °"§ ?F:rY'a.: § °9 8 d6t8 fi.a:da dYij EEdi.,. # 9 ,i tiI'll
pd i. Ci} ,;:::. _ .&•. , a -- ;', :9 3 f ttX98 a 9#Nfi I�t`�F. E� : Ellt "q e,a an } � S�t 1tl .. �
g,Y..."�re.p�.
"WIT
.t ag{¢k �X .iS >; �FJ'L; !€ {A� Pgl3it$ i I'1dallt;i;"111F gri oht # }s,i �3 i a r99 t%; t`"cs.
P' ara
q,. �,
yr; IJ, g�
i
I ,, .F, r l ;, °s€1 `.6itl , p r Y''1: € , .a k {is ; , Ya g� � 9!.r " } �;;' z ,1�i ,,�r'� tl�' r�r'ts �{ �fl. •.itlq fix, t: 1 !1r r�S?,=.:# t e " i�}Y{4x ,�9 n'�� [ .� j'
,$ :, Ft
€ @' €p
,"�...":€ v€ 'S �SE��}l.l,?i S, t Ez a
d:d re ypgit�. 3 @S d§ Sr31ij( $9.a. oa$§saal }1S f,t kgd61881t
,�, @C 9• jtkAS�.:i s. - $: a i !:gg t tR[}iltrt F F- Y -' # 5;..j ti - i 3 e9 rg g !ftl it 1. d 6,.£ 3 a.F (F i i t P:•, .l ,@ 7 4d} �.. : I- q E{€6{ }� RR 8r C .. 119 r 39a�j.3a Pee ,.. a�Y{J¢{�g .lS
-It::y::. E€ d. BI , .l , r �r"."��_..�,I3 t t Y Fj::.}�?il�•�a. a r11 � �€>1314��ii3x£?S � 1 ,a� td.-, y € itf ad €�i�€ 3 �> d'i�a s ;IS�€ d�l�.: €$� �_••Eix '� a:;¢ F 9r. �
€,�1� s � $ � t� .. rrr�
_ aE;,.'' aa. a9$sL+ Y ! §S{d{ p§€'.I. •+€'7 § 4 Ii�: a to s i't;-]4 !$a`'`$€..5�3' y� S �ii �1 V�,k r _.�}y }.p ^g q j 1��. i,$ d $ "a..::r r r, lY,# °?� ,J.+d,ydj
a�tls'A
Isy'rur.a sM n
`4"" , 7,%M"e}d i.- *Y€' utM
v +?gyp¢ w9i r f + rri' + n ry
at ...,:. If '4b€ s..aT, ,j +ri� ' $' A ,a tr:r F S Sr:a:: i!'t#kilkkrlt� k4F fX kt i i S EEttvt tV i �d�i!@f § idt��tt':.n,
Et$` < _..$. s :::F;i tt r Ic i.aaa° ,. ,a „.,kF:ca'd 71x:a ia F} Il ;${•t d
- � g s
S ! .I a it
eSS, .:q.
_,_ i-1 R1,
:r s,ia�9,lte,�6°; I,t
y,e<.ipd td ii
q,i:S' $ ,',
rS".t:
I � lb§.. ',�. a }� - r 'd �t€ � Fr a to „ ri !(t F i€di m' { � 1� " �� S )r ,� � a ? � �''3 ��� {i� il, �:� $ •q.r if d � @$ #� i93 , €�� ��4$=�t39
rX Fls t ��
f�rgi H+ �`pt� 1
-[ .. ,.$i E fg ,r,tls, hrl •16 na '4 i. sS i _ ; t I a' 9 ..,S 9 +� 1,
� S °
ink Y;1 .
?;;� i" , i
l' 1 d�Sk- aE l E.. alv. {S?4G'.S". 1t `e d'aIr r Sa a 4 d4 .. qq1.
S1 t :: 4i,§ .a°;ak r€$€, 9 < : ta€ € 4fa.a. 3 t ,_ <S+ StS i ::a a=-? t .a E.€: t igrd5- ; 1�
.: Ml E a {{ l a� 77 d g p{ 9¢9$9$3 a = 01{ § , d .$r .� .. _ g gg p i;!! €t,
S a } .. _x_gii9 }a EI , g a l6, , 11, ,g Xi- tl >Ii{9 l"�.,i tt9��ggl 9 �g S} -. , , z § € t ((:.g
�1 ,4 ta.l , ��� €E ; .i€� 9F�', it" 1 ; r ;€ � @�g ; , €� ;, ° :,P;•'9 q i ; ., p g; i ,,(„ $ ' "�> di �,. °�@ .R r rFPit9
f t - = t 1 :i. tl i@i 1. X,dl9 ,l�a @ d a .a s>}1 i.: S' �l?i D 14t . ? :3@ da �:R?`, a r� �1 'aS ,* r { r,
r $ i t �1 �i ; ,l y , ! iti I E� fit Ii i d I§#1 .;. i Y Y r
1 i+.:,ra'lti� 1rr i! -a €-a: a<, LLI)I�t�__g°��% ��lj„ *� dO�I ilril a �H'h i it � � F�aa(
.��}} �, 'di � ��� 1 7 � i { �[€ � a ,ti�.4 � k S �(
i'i!'&tNtdnr::l € '�.";'.,lilt+' r!d �¢itr�• i¢ F€t'' { k':,�t :� ad`
�§ty.a -i.€� iSrlt tSb.rE.F��,{kr41Y! ffx.:. `�.p+ (lM'rr1 rli � >Ixly.Vi€r" t:
_, :• `' $P'tarE _ �g .Pr } €$k, , E y _id3 E t. a.: I"
i' NIP OM g ,};K� <:4a,?:•�g{j d� ('='F€�� �t,i � S age vPtlt fear : �r _
d$1.€ i, e��.. agt{9
, Ce i' si __:_-€-' c
• l � .°� .r€ r saes9ga a vC s 3E_! ." .r ':re�r°E�3 E Rill
€ 9y.:: p 19 n l ,;..°qa.. , �'i_ d-5..:.1}'e 5-g ,g8 < rr ? "•1:; i1 -€ �i�'° � 3}. , laa ;r it 39si �h €4� g:zil #„j�-�� „¢° g1°A, 1fl r i� ¢a�i�a� § ir: i i� ' 3, 'i1d'dF 1 '3p tlti4t 1 _ :1 .5. S r ��.:�, tia+itP ! t �- a ' a:s. ,d, , a. ::i➢P".
M
;i 7

'51fy pot
3{��Efia''{ 1_1, °€ Pik{ g('P:.Y51, 4Est {'� i 3� �g� 2,E�rV
ft3 a
}:. 4a�1
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit JPfRoutine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
Permitted 91certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
FarmName: .............. 6-41. j.............. . F............................................
Time: s�
Operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County:..... -. �.4.��.j..................... .................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .............................
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:..................................
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ......... I.................
Onsite Representative:......�"�'�....° f.��t.. ......................... ................. .. Integrator:....... .
Certified Operator:....... .... Operator Certification Number:
Locationof Farm:
i
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� �«
Swine
Design Current Design Current D
Ca aci Population -Poultry. .. Capacity Po uiation Cattle Ca
❑ we to Feeder
EaTeeder Finish
p
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Dairy
Frrl
Y i {
Ei
Non Dairy
. trE �Ei:el
E:E74u�.1`R�fS. IF
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capaefty
ToW$SLW `.
Number of Lagoons t ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & ;Stream lmpackti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [I Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:...............................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): Z�
5100
❑ Yes J'%lo
❑ Yes P14o
❑ Yes J2­ N"o
❑ Yes E�`No
❑ Yes E?f4o
❑ Yes �eNo
❑ Yes ;io
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 5 1 — I Z Date of Inspection S1­7 8 Printed on: 1/9/2001
�5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
0Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
,3'1To
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
FNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
elevation markings?
,fNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
&No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
INo
12. Crop type .S ",.. ICU.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
;il"No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
WN,o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
jo No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? CF W% we—r- r"44 kjtilA,.. Jr.
❑Yes
wf4o
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Gi� hermit readily available?
❑ Yes
�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components o the Certified Animal7pas&anagement Plan readily available?
't S
❑ Yes
XNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) �t
Alt(. +hA�it "��
10�
% -z d < 1
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, avast a al�sis & soil sample reports)
;�-Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
eNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ONO
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [2No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes VNo
0: Y� v re � ��• :::. . . :. . �. . ::
Yo> w�...... ... r lei E „ra��S
.. • ctiriest>toridence: about: this visit.: • :..: • ... . :..:� .........:........
Coraurnentsa(refer to question #) , Ezplaut :any YES answers andlor any recommendations oir,?aqy, other-comteenb
Use i ra+�vings of facility to bett&explain,situaboins (use addetari�al:p'ages a9 necessary} ,k � r ,. � � "w° �A
t�i,1�sP>✓c_6�¢ JESTso�.��.,L�G "Ta 3E �Ah�. o,�t.y._;7to-JARIUL
0jv_�5 tra vim"Fy %faLviiKES, BL V �APP�4 2 To Ftucr�ar6
uU:rNr- 'PaMP+4G,PAM6S-
5) or1E .JaSAS �� G �f•1 . { a6 !�dl-£ � xlLD `�1k3- 'Z-�Pa ft. 1 CAS- F-W-CS,0"f.�`�
kuDZ'o is 4--m- Ad Voo— 4, LA64tJ— A- VCGvr.4s �f*. c.Avc- w)
srSTErv� fZE�1Vi2E+a
ql zt caMnti�r s� r �cF,,rn i-rsTA-r.t,_a 0A".e _ sue, 'a u S1M
,� E p ' ;� •a1 , -,�' ...,,„ j "1""G'!D'I "�i•,� �"iE[{°P7^'r-'S�"??r-?'..
Reviewer/Inspector Name q s �' .i�, f i '€1w3�:.',' $ 3`� S�is �[,1,
_ !� f3�.a�tt
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: _S_ Date: a

Facility Number: ,S -- Date of Inspection $ n Printed on: 1/9/2001
+Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 412 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes -4!�No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ONo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONO
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or ��
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El Yes l:eo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes .0 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ;Io
Additional Comments an or, .. rawtngs:,
l.etl+a,
i�! � D: *J_
Ate' �,.t � �� K1A`1 Z�f7 _ f. o �� R`"o 6t;� � A�•-�
/ / �,:� iN V� � G.,. C.l � w...-a.� t fl GS �.t � @.� � � s �� r►a� ) !• 1� F"o-w
sroo
J

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint OQ Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number $] l27 Date of Visit: 8/8/2000 Time: 12:30 Printed on: 8/11/2000
0 Not Olierational C Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: •.
Farm Name: Glula.DAYWC.I.Ar 1.............................
County: Jolmstam........................................... RRO............
OwnerName: Qua ...................................... Bay.ette........................................................ Phone No: 553.-4.09.4 ....................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title: .. Phone No: .................................................................................................................
MailingAddress: 138.7..UDR.Rd....................................................................................... clay.wa..Nc ........................................................... 2.7520 .............
Onsite Representative: Glenn BoyeXXe............................................................................ Integrator: 8,prjrM].YlcAdaIY..Ea,['.ml'.lJue..............................
Certified Operator:PMercy..G................................. Boyene ............................................. Operator Certification Number:17.7.5.7 .............................
Location of Farm:
iR 1708 north out of Clayton past the Neuse River and take first right and go to 1387 Loop Road A
w
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 40 G 21 " Longitude 78 • 25 G 39 GG
'tl'
.:iDesi
IS
i Ile. t .
I''. Wean to Feeder ❑
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
� a�?[r�-.ai:tl i
n
,t:Ca aci
u.cuuian.•
Current
Po ulation
:llr i� 3 - .p-; a;i mrm.y�.n...�.. - yv; utiut ,�. .ass+.x,:ax��7• i'�`,
"' �� Destgu Citrrent '' i Design I 'Current
Pauiltry, , t `b Ca acts Po ulation , Cattle Ca ace ,, P,o ulahon I,
❑ Layer ❑Dai �,
❑ Non -La er 4 ❑Non-Dai !ilk
i t t i
�
t� !�' r I I,
:�lualter ilt;;?� tttsaa�r ,rntttts ! !t'' li"Xq
❑Other �i' i �,, I�,t t,tt, t� lliiEli:u;Ill`'
lit.. �; si �lljl!! i�!PlE � �N f �s
it 'x I ;< i Toial�Destgn Capacity 2,560 °!
I� 3
t t
t„ ij �' �9�To al SSLW 45,600`
i n ti iI c �i lit IIT !!aM HltpuH$I Mitt
2560
Giltskj�
Boars
,..,r.,..�- ..,,, .w...,, ,,.,... »....
..._...................�
.� ._,__
� ri ts� ,dons# �
Number of La Dons
+�pt����!p
Haldin 1?onds 1 Solid Tra s
��.�wQm,.rs+rswi�in�tml�i mwrittun . msrw�+w
i
t
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field I'
g P Y
Ij Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System t'
Discharges & Stream Jmoac]s
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & T.ralluent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ................ J$, ......,

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 51-127 Date of Inspection 8/8/2000 Printed on: 8/11/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes. ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Analication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ Wi1P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Nti vibl'a,tiolris:oi• de'cienicies •were noted iiuringthis: visit. You:ri�iil ireceive•no'-fttrther'. - , : •
correspondence. a0ut this - : : : ' : : : ' : :
bvisit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1) Pin hole leak in irrigation line, waste in diversion ditch and 100 feet below along ditch and path. To replace coupiing(s), section of
hose as needed.
4) Freeboard just over where marker is driven into lagoon. Estimated at 18 inches (marker recently installed); level appeared to have
been a few inches higher (about 3 inches higher) recently by evidence of residue on the inlet pipe. Producer indicated 25 inches of rai
in past month. Permitted; thus farm must notify DWQ when inadequate freeboard. Marker may be set lower than measurement would
indicate for this lagoon. Grower has always used bottom of inlet pipe (level currently below the pipe) for `start' pump mark. New
marker recently installed placed by reference to original design measurements. Producer states lagoon height exceeds design thus
marker is too low. 7) Has not mowed to toe of lagoon; thus cannot adequately observe the complete structure.
[Reviewer/]ns ector Name ( ,Hunt?S11"uE '+uEp f. '� i r.`�"n1' '.�4ili, 66e"nl'rif}1P+;}41i}I
P ,Jahn N. _�.1 �, + 4 +.,, ;. -+,,4 , }u�,. -:I+�4 }4E}ls,,}.,4it ,. _

'Pt r-f /on
10 Routine O Complaint �_Wollow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 'Prg-�
Time of Inspection Z.3a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
prirermitted 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .............................................................................................................................. County: ............,L! A .tj............. ......................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:................................................................................. ...
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:................................. Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:......... .L ......�4............................................... Integrator:........D C7...............................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ........... ................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
i
J-,
... .....
Latitude • 4 " Longitude • ' "
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
C;
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
s-,HoldinwPondVi'S6Ii&TA
Dist n 11' lCurrent`' 11 z�a ' yr' Ii �De''stgnrb Current
,Poultry,ac'Ca
'act ' : €'Po" ulgbon'.
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
f'k� ❑ Non -Dairy
f�`Tota�=D�eslgnCapac>tty,�t
�
l
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
N t' No Li uid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches}: .a5......�' ...... ....................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
;14es ❑ No
❑ Yes 040
❑ Yes P1<o
CAA -'FA
.,�Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 13-N
❑ Yes ❑ No
AErTes ❑ No
Structure 6
................................
❑ Yes "0
Continued on back

Facility Number: f 27 Elate of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes,,,eNo
)eyes ❑ No
❑ Yes;allo
❑ Yes AINO
❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
*.41pti4jjs.o- ftrjcjencies "r� o 0�et�• 0460g �iis'vlsjt; Yo> wii •teeoiye J14 futtp r. .
CO' rrespo deike.about thws visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes , ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
R\ C%4 �,t.g_ L2,At-- t'J tP,( rAvi") L.:-JE7 W^S> I-1 jDZ (z(L.�iaa A -AD
J Lam.,-1 {Qt-rcr rS �o (s 41�4i _ "'Zr;
1 04EEDEP ll kLr qZ MA'Y 3E sF-gr LovJf_ 2- TO34,J a4EaSut�''4V 7:� I'VD"COO
gg �4.$ rfjT-ejz-S C..Qm J d !D l"
2£C&,j7 I+^!S=r"ALLF9) 1 EJ •t. 6I+PPE^-f-f]
SB� peS Dv , gat -r P t�
t`wcr+Cq-S bJ ate- P%n,lus~rnliFY Dc,.14 w14�,J (r1>�-Q•ATr-C g�a
t f PAS r ,1.t�r/1- �'
hi Ar ,.) oT— A 1Dkd E'A "rn "1 o& I,AuS C!.p..[ tJ aim �.9 Q J A € �Y "i�S s✓lLJE Co n1�L �rf:. 5rt2wC-r'I (t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
-j_
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: n_--1,.J. 4-1„� � . Dater Q�

1Faciiity Number: — z Date of Iatspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the Iand application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
al
C "vuqA- OA-5 ALwA 4 S tAr a r•- {~�L�� p P� C k a~�
�5 v,►.r '©4'4 L�sEL) �02 ' S-rq�—` Q%JN. f AA AtiLY,
R 1-01- P LA C-r.--O IR'i
S-AM-Fs L R Q),-b
iT.3c2' L'b W
CEO M c� y e �,� •JA c.D P J

c
�OrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-uE of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Z Date of Inspection S �l o� r� w►m4d b
Time of Inspection •'f : 24 hr. (hh:mm}
jd Permitted eCertified D Conditionally Certified 13 Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated
GrE E"� Count •.l S T-) ..�
FarmName, ....................... ......... /..................... .......... N
Owner Name Phone No: S 3 �`F
`.............................................
Facility Contact: ....... ....................................................................... Title: Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .t Q?T� ........................................................... Integrator:.......�?..�.�:. woo t>...� �s.._........................
Certified Operator: .................................................... ........................................... I... ....... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• `�'� , �« Longitude 79 • ZS , aT111
i -Design '` Current
Design Current ,; g x �i� .„ i,Destgn°r4,'�Current
$wine Ca `aci Po ulation
;
_
Cii aci Caftie...... 'act zPo
,
:Poultry
.:po'ulahon, , e..'.,.Ca ; ulation.,
❑ Layer
, ' ❑Dairy 7�
❑Non -Layer Non -Dairy
1
❑Other
, �,�c�'ii�t E' ��lir�4�ki�i+
av
Design Capacyty
,Total
t i
1.' 1 Total SSLW
,
t,inl';::
E ak t is
oon ce Drains goon Area ❑ bpraytF�elldtA�ea
F�P�!Holdin urn
}
g Ponds�l S� Solid d Traps ,' 2 ' ' � ❑ Nobl.i Liquid Waste ManaeemetOS stem
9 g Y
..,.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
��
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ i3oars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Statc'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin`?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ti
Freeboard(inches): ............ . ........................ ...................................................................................
��- ol�o,Y. ? pp�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integri y �bf'any o the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0'islo
❑ Yes �No
[:]Yes
7fNo
Structure 6
❑ Yes VNo
Continued on back
3123/99

Facility Number: j — Z Date of Inspection1 C
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes )2'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes eNNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? f31Yes ❑ No
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ONo
12. Crop type cp a"'r S7-a- a..S $ &0- E.S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ErNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
;Zo16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ �Yes
Reuuired Records & Documents
17.• Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Gener 1 P rmit readily available? ❑Yes 0<0
18.
'Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
Cj No
19.
Z � $/yq
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri ion, fr�board, � Arqy naly'SKl i & soil sam ( reports)
Yes
❑ No
20:
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
'N,
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
QNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
,�No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0-90
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
RrNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
Vc� •yiQl�>iiggs'o� d�f#c�encie� •ire pQCe�• �>jtr'it�g this: visit; • Y:ou wiii •reegij+e �o t'u>�t�gr • • •
corres' o derlce: about this visit:
-) pa: MAC.-r� rWJra:,r;, 6, G,4�,c�.J l-or—A-cc-sus• A,
CAso_;f_ Cr- � cZCc dAV-,•o,1. 0Jwe-Ga_,od To E!�kT-EW7- ar- PQT-g -r;'4_L y
�'•2�'ldS?r_c!T: z,4 'MAZ Y-WA" Oz.11 A4.0 O-VE_ Fa- utwat .
Musr L�A�N M11ANcdC47- r4 STAirLZ.,O 13 f Ji4LI Zuoo_
151 �'E✓¢-�; tt2.r) F�1Gi i-�' t �S AOF_ To nlA;rlTA ",J it u�l�t< t t'} F6aA��3 lo(,
wASTC 5 �teMPLf�� r3\r CaILLEC ZZA 4 ��� J acx, g 'Wks 11��FP`�'fzl�e€ tea- Qt' T
Reviewer/Inspector Name a i 9 o'fJ� s AFT` r-�' �n1, i r, ,,,:.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 6�� Date: [ r�

Facility Number: — 2 Datc of . uspection 1 01('! 00
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 2 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes JErNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ,2 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 0�40
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes , No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /[�J/No
A61
J

E
Facility Number , _:Z _. Date of Inspection G-
�,�,,,,y Time of Inspeclion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted © Certified © Conditionally- Certified ❑ Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated .
Farm Name: ............................................................. County.
OwnerName: ................................................................................................. ......................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
.
Facility Contact: ....................................... ..................................Title Phone No:
MailingAddress.................................................................................. ........................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Reps'escntativc:..t .........4t'.1...I ...v.............. 7.11.0 Integrator:.... �7P1C.f�1/ .............. , + ........ y....... ........ ` .
Certified Operator:. .................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 1 �� Longitude "
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver JE1 Dairy
eeder to Finish ❑ Non Laver 10Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1_J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ —Lagoon Area 10Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischar,c originated it: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
n. It discharge is oesen eel. was the c onvevance man -ma
de
h. [f discharge is observed. did it reach W iter c>I thc.State:' (If vcs. notify DWQ}
c. If discharge is observed. what is the eslimated flow in eal/min"
d. Does discharge bypass a la20011 system'' (11'ycs. nutifv I)WQ}
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav
Structure I Structure 2 StruCLUre 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
r
❑ Yes ❑ IN,
❑ Yes ❑ No
i
❑ Yes ❑ NO
❑ Yes Qi No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes DNo
l
.[:]Yes []`No
Structure 0
Identifier:
Frtchoard(inches): ....... .... ............................................................................................................................................................................................
S. Are there any immediate threats'to the integrity of any of the structures observed" (icl trees. severe erosion. ❑ Yes L—A
seepage. ctc J r
Cunlinued on h(ick

Facility Numher: — Date of Insprc-tion
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan`? ❑ Yes [/No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste rnana2ernent system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'? /❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. g*awed markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes [(No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes YNo
IL . Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Funding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑!No
12. Crop type A2j rt Z C' D /L J
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMPy? ❑ Yes 20No
14. a) Dues the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a weitahle acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes V�qo
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Flo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Do
18.
Does the facility fail to have al' components ol'the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
19.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.) //
Does record keepiny need improvement? (ie/ irrigation• freeboard• wakf�qanalysis & soil satIlre reports)
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
01<0
J2`No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in e13 cAt the time of design?
❑ Yes
0
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
VNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
/E No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�INo
�: PVo viofaiioris;or deficiencies -were 'n6 ed. du•ritig Ais:visit: • Y:ot l :will-r. ebfAve 64 further '
correspondence. about. thi .visit..:. . . . . . . . . . .
Coiiiiinenis ;(refeeto'que§lion #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
.At G
e
Date: S

F.Icility Number:< I — 1, Date of Inspection
Jl
/
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage _pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes !!!!!! No
28,
Is [here any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance prublems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'' (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31,
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
t No
32,
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'?
❑ Yes
No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
AL
T
3/23/99

' 'DI an 1ViSlOri Of SOIdWateC COnServatro[I'- pCCdtlon
©j,
D'Drvrsion of Soil an'd.WaterConservatron -Compliance lnspectron '� t ` t `
a.:.
E
�j'Drvisron ofWater Qualaty'= Conipliancspectione'In'^� ,
Other_Agency'�- Operation;Review
Q Routine O Com laint .Qrrollo%v-u of I)1V itts ection Q Follow-u of DS«WC review Q Other
Facility Number ! 1 [1 f Date of inspection `[
I inre of Inspection +-30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [] Not O erational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .......�.r. `��N �.. .�. € :.. Q1`r...... .... County: ............................... :.............................. .......................
OwnerName:......................................................:.................................. I'lione No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:_.........,...:......_........................................., PlroneNo: ...................................................
MailingAddress........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:.'�-^!..Y. F Integaor:.., .:/. �.� .`........ .................................................. ..!.............................. Certified Operator: .......... ........ Operator Certification Number:............
Location of Farm:
y
............................................................... ...................................................................................................................
Latitude ' 4 �4 Longitude ' C]' °C
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine _ Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder -r ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I 1E1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present I ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes 4INo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance: man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. li' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if dischar­, ee is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin'?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other Than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [:]Yes /No
-`--Structure I Structure 2 Structure• 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Idenlifier: 4i
Freeboard (inches):
.....................................................................................
1/6/99 117
'_CZd 5 C- P � fir/ 1 — i{'7, / 4T Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of leispection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvcmcnt? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste gructures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑ No
Waste _Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvcmcnt? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen El Yes El No
12. Crop type slr`l W ��-s3-c�€.S .... lke-5 ............................ ......................................r...............................................,................................. I .......... I..............
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No.
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint) ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Re aired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ;2�No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ YesNo
o.vialatioiis.tir. det3ciencies.were nokd. dtirin� .tliis.visit:..Y.ou W* 111.re� eiv� nay r6rtliei- .:...
rresp6rideiiee'ti ;D(It'this visit..
Comments (refer, to question,#): Explain any YES answers and/or any, recommendations or any other comments ;11 } �'7
v yexplain p necessary)cl.
Use drawm s of facilit to better situations. ( g use additional pages as�"
r GA�a��
Ste,,,,
PAS: M : +j i ,, r z 1E
1�s aa� �fl G�lar�� �n .��-�d+.� ES �"l4(�LiSl7►i+r� GP-�s5�� a� `L�C�or�r.i
GA-Crt �Sv F= o w�a n S't'AT�►S OF-
Reviewer/Inspector Name a r j #
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rh•] Date: Z
t /6/99

Division of Soil and Water'Contie'rvation' - Olier`'ation Review ` "`` ' F i r i V <
©,Division of Soil and Water Conservation -Compliance Inspection
WateC QUahty - COnll)h:mce In5peelloq `'�: •"'L E `� r
D.Ot
her Agency�-°,Operatjon'Review
Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up of DNVQ inspection Q Follow-up of• DSWC review O Other
F.L61ity Number j Date of Inspection 3 2.1 �
Time of Inspection I / s:� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�P it Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [] Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: GI.F..l..I Qb "T County s� kl,.%S.''!...................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .............................................
Onsite Representative:...�Cg,.j pp �.XTC.................................................... Integrator:.....��'2.;h}Cs..!!'��A�,?�?�....��'� s..........
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................,
Location of Farm:
A
............................ ..........................................................................................................................
Latitude 4 14 Longitude • 6 66
urrent
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish -9 S 6-0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Harrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I[] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid,Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated al: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. 1I'd ischargc is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters ol'the State ❑ Yes No
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /� No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4• Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) ,:.......... �........... ......................... ................................... .............. I—— ........ I ...... ................ I .......... I ........ ...................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Sl— /7Z7 Date of Inspection 3 23
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes VNo
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [;�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes LKNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes 10No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Ycs ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes 21<0
12. Crop type srm,aa,r t3�,{tS.... G9.. APE'.. GArEL�t E................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes BNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (lootprint) ❑ Yes /C�No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes XNo
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 'J�0
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L fo
18,
Does the facility tail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
[]Yes
j2(No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time o1' design?
❑ Yes
V No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
P(No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
PNo
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Y s
;0"No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
s
❑ No
0. NA.v161at1on3 a]r. deficiencies .were noted. during ifiis.visit:. You w' ilfre�ceive nd Mriiier ' - ' -
corresptKidetece:a>�out'this visit..... ...... . . . . ... . . . .. . .. . . .... . .
Comments (refer to question #) ° Explain any YES answers and/or: any." recorrtmendations,6r any, other corn rnents R i iF
Use drawings'of,facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): r t t 01
Nas.Jotr vnn to yE rY i99y- irAa<c�drc,;, c;4P iAus IGtRbS Tod �,Zr r-a- Al 4T'v,. ,.1
Z i&AL(— SQcrS (�) i A9-TA-gLA,, 0 Lk-, YtSGV—rAn'K- CaJQ=V--
5)� �IJtrua_+) PJ x� ,Ai sas-1 Ai
N•� ; M tf? �iD, r� -.,a A 1Lav Sit : rAA-
p}itkCSE� rr►,A_i EZO s f��I+<M��1�S Fbf-D rE� Siut '1 c
Nit t3inn�f� �urs�FF jWra LAG*-:�
ICA
t!k'? " D ;
M 1TT£O lF_0 TLC A,ILLIT_ lE&-VP
,,6 sa, �S SAA v U 941-541,'X E� Pn/nfvAL
I-
I AZO L3 G ?_V_r_4Z,4W SAfl% , S li'r 4r-D a LNG _ T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4,L. J �:���� Date: 3� � hiq 11/6/99

❑ tvision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
0 Division of Water Quality
11
outine O Com laint O Follow-u� of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
r�r�rrrrrrr����_-
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
U Registered ID/Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ...
.Farm Name:...�r //.f?.0 .....lt--£,e 4,........ Rcrvl.. .................... County:.......: �.............. .......................
. ...
Owner Name:............1�?�.�PrV�......... ��................................................. Phone No:......... .."` .`.`?.................................
Facility Contact: ........... ..�`....1:OXA......... Pl. .. Title:............... .. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress :............ 11...f?...1........ Ul..... ....I.a................,..................(I ..... .......Alvf............. .........................
Onsite Representative: ....... Gl`.1 4y ...B.......f,.,: ........... ...... ... Integrator:....... ... ,Cn,tR
Certified Operator-_ .............................................................................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
c
C
Latitude '='=" Longitude • G "
Design Current
Design ,,Current
Design Current
twine
Capacity Population ,.:Poultry
, Capacity xPopulation Cattle Capacity Populat on
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
fF.
weeder to Finish
Z 141D
❑ Non -Layer
Non- Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other,
;..
� �
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
r
Total MsiedCa lat'tty
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW9
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons ! Holding Pc►nds 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present]p
Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field ALeaj.
xx
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 91Qo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [SKo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Cl Yes M'No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑'IQo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2"NO
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes C9I0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes OJI�4o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 031qo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes [9"No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes (I3 No
7/25/97

acility Number: —
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes y o
Structures (Lagoons,llolding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc ,)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [;Wo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:r
Freeboard(ft):...3...r..............................................................................
........................................................................................................................ .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [9.7<0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [9'1�o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes G' O
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) �,!
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 2<o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop hype ............... CAfi4k4opes........... off'.1...........p.Sinp!!aas.......PRP .. %a..-fw........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes [O-No•-
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
99-N-o
" 18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
99-No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
- I-146
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
E &�
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
99-No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
O No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
E J'_No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
�io
No.violationsoi deficiehde' s; were noted -during this: visit. • You :Wi11- r6cei've• ito• 6rihet• : -
:.•:correspor�dei>rce:ab'outthis:visit:•:.�.�:�::�:::.•,�.�.�.�.•:�: ��.:�::�:.:. .�:�.::.•: :•
r
7/25/97
I Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
f

1O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ insInTtion 21oliow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection !�
Time of inspection G 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Registered O Certified ]Q Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not Operational, Date Last Operated:
..........................
FarmName: .............................................................................................................................. County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName ...... .............. Phone Vo:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .................................................. . Title....................... .. Phone No.
MailingAddress:.............../............................................. :......
Onsite Representative: L�' Integrator: .................... .. w......................... ......e.I...... .................. ...............................
Certified Operator...........................................................................................................I.... Operator Certification Number..............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �� �'°
ti Design._., Current Design ;Current <°`n :'DesignCarrenf c
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number• — S
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,11olding fonds Flush .Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes /No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):................ I..!<.......^.............................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? j11
es ❑ No
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �d..).....:U.................................................................................................................................................................................,
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0: No.violations-or. defieiencies.were; Roted during this:visit.: Yoa:,iill receive ':further; ::
cotrespondehO d out -this. visit*.,',..
Y P-,ts rSe`�J cvT- ?E-,,)„01a,e*ity a
I
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ElYes [INo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
I 7125/97 H
Reviewer/Inspector Name " .ate „ t,° ` biANI W11.111
° {
l a l //".t1 /�X,, is

a
at
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine
'Facility Number
Follow-up of
0 Registered © Certified E3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
Farm [Name:.......
Owner Name:.....
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 1C
Time of Inspection 1'5 JT_24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
County:.. V 6 � fvz Iz
........................................................................................................ ..... ............................
.................................................................................................. Phone No:.....................................................
.................................................................. Title :......................................... I... I ... ..... .......... Phone No:.....................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ..... (!" ........ y....................................... Integrator:_:5.10&q...A.,E?T,..�...........
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:........................---......--......
Location of Farm:
c
Latitude ' 41 Longitude • 4 "
❑ Wean to Feeder
R ❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
eeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Subsurface Drains Present jj❑ Lagoon Area j❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
q &..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Z�No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [?INo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes eNo
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ;3"No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require zeY o
maintenance/improvement? ```"`''''��(��r
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facdlity Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ YeXsNo
Stri i agoons oldinc Ponds, Flush Pits, e1c.) / --
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 1pf
Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............. j ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):........�...1.........................................................................................»»................................ ............................... .... ... .. ........................ .......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures'need maintenance/improvement? P"Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? P"Yes ❑ No
Waste ApplicatiQn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes XNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering `aters ofthee State, notify DWQ)
15. crop type 5..4�,f.Et._.._...i�L::1�t..................................... ..................................................................................................i��No'
.......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes . CJ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes A�No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ YesA No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Zyes ❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes F No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? es ❑ No
For Cer0 Vd or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes 0No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes EZNo
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes
0 No. viol itions-or deficiencies.wereiloted-du' dng this: visit." Y.66.4i0 iiceive"no,fdriher-: •.
ctirres " 'deuce. about •this: : " ; ; . " ; .
arefertot�uest #)iExlit
P�n sus e�rsran/or a.nyttwntltsa'�0 p h
bll Arawings{of£l"aciu t4i better exptain slttia"Muse gdcildnnal gages aS lnece ry}• �' .
ci h� �� r.:� ��n a x�^"�. '^':[a�:"o-", '.�`��.'.`�fi."y_-`:+.•
1 L5 >-y9-6 �-i s Iq v EZI- e-77f-77 O/E) u/v 1EA171_ kz�f 46/d
R rub 4rla-1 'v c i Cot /UC J /�l�7LIG� 2 Inc s
67 1- 3-6 f /714.4 rL-4s s ET" Ili zz) "e ` . c0 e2N r. rz�kJ 6 E-t2c
..
TO ff` 4 PVT W ikI-c, 1::W1` "4W
/- 4L 0�
G L i ez e i5x�-j 1r� 3 t) ✓J/Ay 5 : M r c. / - r 1-4 LT1
Es A—( H i3�s vt~-� 'i7 0,Aj itA (jc.�>� Jl V ��2s�97
Reviewer/Inspector Name �.` * n £
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:LL

. 4
r
,� yy a e : o, a.._.. .e ^�' *:, ",.. . - ,:'g =oe• a „ ,, ,, L?s;,,, e ,gyp �,x s xs f N s
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation ReviewM x
❑DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection 34 r fig,
S�
Routine O Comp -faint Q Follow-up of D"' s inspection O F olkvv-tt of DS`VC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Facili�Nuber
Time of Inspection / i ti' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr la" min)) Spent on Re%iew-
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
NotCl erational Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name:...... f .�:.. �-, r�.. ........... .2�'` .. ....t ................... .... .......... County:
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:............,...............,...................,......................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:...................,......,..................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................
.......................
4
Onsite Representative:.. � + lV.., 11` ....�.".................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
rr
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i i
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation Design: Cum
K t x xj,
Swtne Capacity`:Popula
. ❑ Wean to Fe 'der
(�J Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
. ❑ Other
Layer
Nun -Laver
Subsurface Drains Present
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharee originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify •DWQ)
Dai
Noi
Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. -Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
/
No
❑ Yes
No
Conli need (in back

Facility Number: — !
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
VNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
❑ Yes
�No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
D No
Freeboard (ft): 'tructurr_ I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure i
Structure 6
.►.. '................. ......................... ................... .......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
......................... ............. ..................
❑ Yes
............... ......
ONo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
31No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement`?
eyes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
0No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
CIAO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type..fl�N.irl`..j...±'1.i�....l..°-.......%%Z.%/1.!........�-
i.l�E:�.......1(
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes
O'No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Rio
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EYNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
A No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ZNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �ZNo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector
Date: (�;_/ a
cc: Division of tVater Quality, TVater Qulllity Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

t Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Sail and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency - Operation.Review
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DW!2 inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Insper,lion 24htr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted 0 Certified [] Conditionally Certified Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName : ...................................................... C:aunt.v:... `}�.............................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ................................. PhoneNo:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact...............................................................................Title:.................. Phone No:
MailingAddress:...................................................... ........................ ...................... ......... ........ .....
Onsite Representative: GLEN lntcgrator:.... .'iE%'....... A: �I ..............
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certit-rcation Number:.,........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' ' 4 Longitude "
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ FatTow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I❑ Non -Dairy
❑Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischaE= & Stream Ini yacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made'? ❑Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Statc? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoa�n systLm'? {II yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes �No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Ni"aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes /jITI No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure J Structure b
Idcntil'icr:
FreeboardOnc•hes): ........ .................. ....:.................. .................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
.3123/99 CarrlilrreerlZ'Iback

1"acilit Number: —
y Date of' Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8, Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes [�`No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes PNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage Ge�ral Per it readily available?
v a i � 1 L—K ir77
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Anil �aste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'Vo yiolaftcjns o. deficiencies were hofed cep .. this;v.. . .. . witl ee lye Rio f.. . . .
' correspondence. about. thus vesit' • . • . • ...... . . • . • . •
;tion #} ExplaiWai#,YES answers and/or any;`reci
to..bette'r'explai.n.situations: (use additional pages a
❑ Yes E211�0
❑ Yes [1Vo
❑ Yes P4o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J'No
❑ Yes C!l�o
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes �,No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
{ — 1 VC--L--O M / fit✓E;V
12
�sy vrs �n� 1zs ��zr�Gti
�� �-r}-s i rV t �f� ( �► I �—�—
��f'Y'1r . WJ(t IC ��Uv� r✓.1�U �b� vtyL���Ii�itr> A _
Reviewer/Inspector NameReviewer/Inspector Signature: a4v y/ Date: % (L C} Q
'i/73/99

Facility Number: ! — �. late of Inspection .
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
ElNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
le
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
�o
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
[�'N0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
/
29.
is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
1E1 No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
/j No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
[�rNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged I'il_4ipe or a permanent/temporary cover'?
❑ Yes
EILA
AdditionaL Comments and/orDrawings: R -
1
3/23/99

MEMO
DATE'_ (cl 1 1 f I ,,
TO: 6; 33b4'F—itF— ...,_ 51 _ SUBJECT:
5)z k 19D
T, c C-kxA- 5o�i. * 1`74
7� WAX- r� $ �rt
Sz- 279
`t,�.j t'C-AA�P V6L -r- f � 3 , 87 a ' , 3
10
S3
1.55-Ac.
y3
• 1 4 14
1 tr Q
e. •<
Sb4
FROM:
�.6
717 s y -
�� s� B GAL.,,
AINEIrWA
�N
NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF
a
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
PRINTKD ON R;CyCLID PAP9R

stir Ake
A
HCDEHR I�
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resour' es MAC 3 �QIo North C a p c � ,
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 30, 2010
Perry Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27527
Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510127
Glenn Boyette Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
Reference is made to your completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
received March 26, 2010. Staff from the Raleigh Regional Office has confirmed that this Coverage is no
longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510127 is
rescinded, effective immediately.
1f, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first apply for
and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal waste management
system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will subject the responsible party to a
civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lor Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Johnston County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS510127)
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] l FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715.60481 Customer Service; 1-877-623-6748
Intemet: www.ncwateraualihr.ora
NorthCarolina
naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Aclion Employer

OF WA p Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
January 10, 2007
Mr. Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd.
Clayton, NC 27527
RE: Request for Information
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility No. 51-127
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
On January 9, 2007 our office conducted a follow up visit to your facility due to the recent wet
weather conditions since our last inspection when the observed lagoon freeboard was 20" (near the start
pump mark), and also in response to your emergency notification on January 8, 2007 (Incident #
200700132). Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review. Please note the following:
a We are by this letter requesting you to submit all the waste application records,
rainfall and freeboard levels recorded since December 1, 2006 to date to the address
at the bottom of the page by January 31, 2007.
a You would be required to complete and submit the 30-day Plan of Action (POA) given to
you at the time of inspection to lower the lagoon back into compliance if the waste level
comes within 12"-18".
You are once again advised to address any rodent activity and completely fill the
groundhog holes in order to protect the structural integrity of the dike walla
Please be advised that failure to furnish our office with the required information by the given
deadline shall result in a violation of your General Permit, Certificate of Coverage and your Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Please also note that nothing in this letter shall be
taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability of any violation that may be found during
and after the period in question.
Note that a follow up visit may still be required to assess the conditions in -situ if wet weather
conditions continue. If you need further assistance such as the preparation of the Plan of Action, please
consult your technical specialist.
Aquifer. Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
None Carol/i
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 /{/atuj+Q�l
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet; http:lAvww.ncwaterqualily.org !/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Cant. Page Two
January 10, 2007
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility # 51-127
If you have any questions, please contact me at 919-791-4232 or Joseph Gyamfi at 91091-4231.
Sincerely,
c
S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Cc: Johnston County SWCD Office
DS WC-RRO
RRO Compliance Animal File 51-127
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC.

FORM lRR-2
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # ! Field #.J. i♦ Facility Nwnher_--
Field Size (wetted acres) = (A)
_
Farm Owner
-� % irtigatiOn Operator
/tri it
i ; FjOLf((??
C3wnars Address I
LCJL7 Irrigation Qperaiors
/ w
,V 2
owners Phone q
Operatars Phone #
�s S 3-
_
From Waste Utitl:ation Plan
Crop Type
ReoamrrwxW PAN
Loading (Ibfacre) = (a)
e,• G
i11 921 (3) (4)
(M (6) 17) (R1
(91 (10) 1t13
t,y ., ' _ ._
to (rnrnlddlyr)
Irrigation
Waste Arnalysis
(1bl101 gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblacre)
. `�
1000
Nitrogen
Balance
"•~��^^rs)
(S) - (t0)
Weather
G"50 •
inspections
(initials) ,
_,_•.
Time
Fr�
Time
Te!�
Minutes
(3) - (2)
it r+t
Sprinklers
Operating
Flow
Rate
(gailmin1
V
Total Volume per AqB
(gar�l lbcw�.r '
(6) x (5) x (4) (7)1(A)
Bz
I
30
a-
�57a
�$�
�
-99
l o4o
3 a
i
'0
ca f 3"3
n
v�-
.0
Crop Cycle Totals
Total PAN
C*nees Signature Operator's Signature_
Certified Operator (Print! Operator Certification #
• weather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Cloudy, Ct-Cloudy, R-Rain, S-SnowlSleet. W-W)ndy
Persons wrnpleting the irrigation inspections must initial to signify that inspections were compieted at least every 120 minutes

NOWS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web Site: www.neagr.com/agronomi/
Report: W04367
'.y
Grower:
Boyette, Glenn
1387 Loop Rd
Copies To: USDA-NRCS Johnston
a?� t
Clayton, NC 27520
aWaste
Analysis Report
Farm:
-
12/18/2006
Johnston County
Sample lArmation
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca
M9 S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo CI C
01
Total 159
23.3 427 98.7
30.2 15.4
2.46 0.18 0.45
0.39 0.74
IN-N
Waste Cade:
-NH4
Na Ni Cd
A Al
Se Li pH
SS CN DM% CCE% ALE(K )
ALS
-NO3
102
7.36
Description:
OR N
Swine n Li .
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available fdr First Crop
ibs/1000 fallow
Other Elements lbs/1000 allows
Application Method
N M5 Rao Ca Mg S Fe
Mn Zn Cu
B MO C!
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li
Irrigation
0.66 0.31 3.4 0.58 0.18 0.09 0.01
T T T
T
0.85

I/h
" C -3.4(Y9
�'-eO� �d e

all
r
a
A /Cr
9r%c/c/
,4p Avlel
a, O/CI

A�F wAr�9Q�
`S
o �r
Mr. Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd.
Clayton, NC 27527
Dear Mr. Boyette:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 15, 2006
RE: Animal Operation Compliance Inspection
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility No. 98-127
Johnston County
On December 8, 2006 our office conducted an annual compliance inspection of your facility 98-23
to verify that (1) the facility has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the facility
is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15A NCAC 2T.1300; (3) the facility's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the
required records are being kept; and that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Although there was not a major non-compliance issue, there are several issues discussed with you,
which if not addressed now and properly, could lead to serious potential problems in the future. Please
review the comments noted in the summary section of the attached inspection report, and address the
concerns or issues discussed some of which are highlighted below:
• The ground hog holes must be filled with good soil material and compacted as soon as
possible to protect the structural integrity of the lagoon dike. Mr. John Hunt has brought
this to your attention as well during his visit to your facility on 03/15/2006.
Please remove the weeds on the lagoon dike wall and mow regularly to allow the emerging
grass to grow and establish.
Please be consistent in the recording of your lagoon levels and rainfall events as there were
some missing records for the year 2006.
• Per General Permit Conditions 1I1.13c and V.2, you are required to notify our office
(DWQ Raleigh Regional Office: 919-791-4200) within 24hours at your first knowledge
of such events as discharges, spills, high freeboards, etc. Please be advised that it is a
violation with consideration for civil penalty any time DWQ becomes aware of
inadequate storage in a lagoon/storage pond that was not reported by the producer
or their representative. Inadequate storage in the lagoon will require submission of a
Plan of Action to lower the lagoon back into compliance within 30 or 5 days depending
on the waste level at the time.
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
_ JJne CSI'Oli
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]. Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 j� tul+al
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: httpahvww,ncwaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

• It is required of owners and/or operators to inspect the lagoon after rainfall events greater
than or equal to 1 inch and place your initials against them to signify the structural
check.
• Crop yield records are required to be kept for all crops harvested from fields receiving
animal waste.
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that the aforementioned
deficiencies and any other problems that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible Thank you for your
assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 919-791-
4231.
Sincerely, 4S.r
49"-erman, L.G.
Cc: Johnston County SWCD Office
DSWC-RRO
RRO Compliance Animal File 51-127
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC.

Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27526
June 22, 2003
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Glenn Boyette Farm Facility 51-127
Permit No. AWS510127
Dear Mr. Schuster:
On June 16, 2003, I received your letter dated June 11, 2003 in reference to a follow-up
visit made by John Hunt on May 30, 2003 to my facility. In response to the concerns
noted, I provide the following information.
During the previous week, all four pits were emptied and before refilling began,
approximately three inches of rain fell. After the rain slowed, the re -filling process
began. Mr. Hunt conducted his visit with only two houses completed. Until the other
two houses were filled, it was not possible to obtain a freeboard level, Since that point
and time, pumping on the coastal fields has been ongoing. The freeboard level as of
today's date is 25 inches.
Sincerely,
Glenn Boyette

Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�oF wArF9QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
r Division of Water Quality
0 �
June 11, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNIP
Boyette Farms
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, N.C. 27520
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility 51-127
Permit No. AWS510127
Dear Mr. Boyette:
On May 30, 2003, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a follow up inspection of this
facility based on the concerns with potentially inadequate freeboard that were observed during the
inspection conducted May 13, 2003 . During the inspection it was determined that the freeboard level
was approximately sixteen inches (16) which is a violation of the permit No. AWS510127. V. General
Conditions 3. Explains that the lagoon liquid level freeboard requirement includes capacity for structural
and storm storage for a total of approximately nineteen (19) inches for this facility.
Section 111. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Condition 111. 6. Regional Notification The
Permittee shall report by telephone to the Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than
24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following event 6.e. Failure to
maintain storage capacity in a lagoon greater than or equal to that required in Condition V_(3) of the
Permit. The Raleigh Regional Office did not receive notification for the freeboard level for this lagoon.
Please address these issues to ensure the proper operation and utilization of the subject animal waste
system. You should provide the Regional Office any information that addresses this violation within ten
(10) days of receipt of this letter. if you should have any questions or desire further information please
contact John Hunt at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely;
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr, Dave Nordin, Brown's of Carolina Farms
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
phone [phone]
facsimile [phone]
Customer Service
1-800-623.7748
3TA'
NCD7 a

�A� Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O�OF William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P,E. Director
j Division of Water Quality
Q Y
May 29, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
TURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Boyette Farms
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, N.C. 27520
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility 51-127
Permit No. AWS510127
Dear Mr. Boyette:
Thank you for your response to the request for the records received May 23, 2003. On May 13,
2003, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a follow up inspection of this facility based
on the concerns with the lack of freeboard that were observed on January 3, 2003 . There are some
issues that are violations of the permit No. AWS510127:
- V. General Conditions 3. Explains that the lagoon liquid level freeboard requirement includes
capacity for structural and storm storage for a total of approximately nineteen (19) inches for this
facility. At the time the inspection the freeboard in the lagoon was twenty inches. However, the
freeboard log that you are required to maintain for this facility indicates that the freeboard was
inadequate beginning January 25, 2003 (at eighteen inches) and remained noncompliant until May
10, 2003, The log indicates that the freeboard was as little as fifteen inches from March 22 until May
10 when irrigation of wastes were conducted according to the irrigation records.
- Section III. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. 6. Regional Notification The Permittee shall
report by telephone to the Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon greater than or equal to that required in Condition
V (3) of the Permit. The Raleigh Regional Office received notification from you for the freeboard on
March 20, 2003 and the freeboard was reported at nineteen inches. This is substantially beyond the
twenty four hours notification requirement, and is a discrepancy with the freeboard log which indicates
that the freeboard was sixteen inches on March 15, 2003 and fifteen inches on March 22, 2003.
- Condition 111.5 Records, including land application event(s) shall be maintained by the Permittee for a
minimum of three years. You stated that you had no waste application records prior to 2002.
- Condition 1114. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted as close to the time of application
as practical and at least within 60 days of the date of application. There were no corresponding
samples for the application events recorded on November 16, 22, and 23, 2002. There were samples
dated August 23, 2002 and March 28, 2003, but these are substantially beyond the sixty day
requirement.
- Condition III. 3. A representative standard soil fertility analysis shall be conducted annually on each
application field receiving animal waste. The last soil sample report is dated February 15, 2002.
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone] 1-800-623-7748
a*L
WDENR

Please address these issues to ensure the proper operation and utilization of the subject animal waste
system. If you should have any questions or desire further information please contact John Hunt at 919-
571-4700.
Sincerely;
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: ,Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Dave Nordin, Brown's of Carolina Farms
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

Mai 23 03 01:13p
Bonnie 9oyette
919 553 0489
p.1
Boyette Farms
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27520
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail [e-mail]
TO:d1��U��� —
FROM:DATE-
SUBJECT: e e to P-05
PAGES (TNCLUDNG COVER WE'ET):
Comments:

N
IL
m
m
I-
0
M
to
117
0
m
a
C
c
0
as
Doi..
Form lRR-2 Lagoon Liquid irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract p Field 11 Foci* Number - ! -
Fiaid Size (acres) _
(A) rQ.
Farm Owner Irrigation Operstof
Owner's Address Irrigation Operalors
Address
Owner's Phone N Operater'6 Phone 0
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Fco PRecommended PAN 7
rJ ) y , Loading (Iblacre) = (B) 7
lit 171 Cif 141 V" I l6l f7l 191 M link 1"I
r�r■rlll■■�■rr�rrr.���■lrr�.�■�III■it�a*�
r•
�r.w�il■�■�����snQpi
�
'armor
_
rs7lf/:ls�■!7l�"�
illrlip.��
[r�RT.�
��
la�I.lri�i�]+.i
'Cilia•
/1
IENPJWL��
MwWo ;r
�►lbTtliF���
�lr�.if1��-L•7f?��Re�'7
���
,;���1■��
��alii�
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signaturea�i... - `'' ; t_ �' ' Y Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator Certification a
I Sec your animal wesle managcmvnl plan for sampling frequency. Ala minimum, wnslc anslysit is rcnuircd within fill clays of land applicalion events.
2 Fnler the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Conlinue subtracting column (10) frnru column (1 1) foilnwing each application event.

9)
CD
D
M
uO
un
m
Q
M
m
C
C
Q
m
Form IRR-2
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form For Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Field 11
Facility Number
Field Size (acres) =
(A)
Farm Owner
irrigation Operator
Owners Andress
Irrigation Operators
Address
Owner$ Phone 0
Operator's Phone p
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type
Reoommcnded PAN r�
Loading (IWacre) = lei d fJ
fit 121 131 141 (5) (fit (71 (81 (91 t14) f1i)
i7
�
I•t7 ��
f�IT!
�`�!
� !1 /
FT.E�`I�!"��
I•!s�
��T�l�
=1
I
i1�tss I WM
Ml/
� IMWA
115�
Ulm
iri7S.37�f�I
II•■f1f1♦
�/�ifl���3�
f����aI,JI<��
n�■�I•rs��Il•����
-�
sr-�r�a���
I�;r-�s�
�r,�31I•■■�M
■�I■■■■�
-
��■I•rc��
r��arrtr-��>i
�s�r�s-�I■r
cropfGycle Totals 1
owner's Signature `_=-- Al Operator's signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator Certification ff
I See your animal waste m3nagcmcnt plan for sampling frc[lricncy. AI a minimum, wasic analy9i% is rer}oirerl within Ertl daYS of land application events-
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (ID) from (8). Continue snbiracling column (iD) fronj r[Alimn (I 1) Following each application event.

a
,j
Q,
33
0
as
ru
c
C
0
m
'd r) ()')--
Form IRR-2
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract q
Field N
Facility Number a -
Field Size (acres) _
(A)
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator
owner's Address
Irrigation Operators
Address
owner's phone ft
operalor's Phone p
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type
Recommended PAN
'�--
Loading (Iblecre) = (B)
fit 01 fil 141 f51 f61 (It (H1 19) tin) fill
—Totalvaulm
r+r
r
�s�:
�I■■■■1■�taz�.�s�`�s;�z�■¢�ssr3�jsl■�s,�l■��sr..a.��■I�r►�
r
ic�ir73��
iT.�i►'Js�R!.►.!
!�►�'�
PA
Owner's Signature
Crop Cycle Totals {_
Operator's Signature
Certified Operator {Print} Operator Certification #
I Sce your animal waste managcmcnl plan For sampling frcrfuancy. At n minimum, wnsic FinslygS is n.41iiirC11 within 6n Jays of land opplicalion events.
Fnlcr lltc vahrC rcecivcd by subtracting column (IA) from (It). Continue sublrneling column ( Ill) I'mun column (1 1) following each application event.

a�rxl
Form IRR-2
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract 11 Field # Fecility Number -
Field Sire (acre) = f
Farm Owner Irrigation operator
Owner's Address Irrigation Operator's
Address
Owners Phone q Operator's Phone #
From Animal Wash Management Plan
Crop Type t/ Recommended PAN
/ Loading (lblacre) = (B)
III f21 f31 fat (5) ffil 171 (8) t91 1101 tilt
1.
IJlJ���
r
�ft�
��i7•
��
' j
S'I�
l�,�c�
I�9�►�
��1��
r�IrIIIIIII��
��■■■����
rrl��
�■I���l�
l_��
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator Certification #
I See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. AI a minimum, waste annlysis is rrgs6red wilhin hQ days of land application events.
2 Enter site value received by subtracting column( ID) from (11). Continue subtracting cniumn (110) from column (1 1) following each application event.

CD
Form IRR-2
D
to
D
M
Ln
Ln
cu
P
.-)
a
J)
0
M
to
C
c
0
M
Lagoon Liquid irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract # Field # racilitl Number -
Field Size (acres) =
(A)
Farm owner Irrigation Operator
Owners Address Irrigation Operators
Add►er;s
Owners Phone # Operator's Phone #
from Animal Waal* Management Plan
Crop Type Remnymnded PAN !}
Loading (lbleve) = (B)
111 191 1'M (Al IM M% M tAl t91 Jim 1111
� I11 .:
•ir j
�Ir�:■s�Iarmra��■■I�rs����■r�►aa■��wron�I■■Ii
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator Certification #
t Sce your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At n minimum, wnstc analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (tf). Continue subtracting column (10) from clilumn ( 11) following each npplicalion event.

Mai 23 03 01:14p Bonnie Bayette
919 553 0489
p.7
dD
30
%JA�c � ti c�PS
I
/o
r3
��
ad
a�
a
L�-
r�
�1
a!
aI
a f
a�
L2

May 23 03 01:14p
Bonnie Bo�jette 919 553 0489 F.6

ar
http://storm.meas.ncsu.edu/cgi-bin...avg=on&submit=COMPI LE-+'OBS ERVATIONS
Results from Data Request:
Beginning: 2003-03-15
Ending: 2003-05-14
CLAY daily
Station
Time
Air
Temperature
Average (P(P)
Air
Temperature
Maximum (F)
Pressure
Daily
Precipitation
of
Moisture
v ra
m m
Average
e� i
LAY: a 1y4
?.k
u _
. 03�, -,i 3 59 QO
,.9,fi,. ,i''iF kxa. ..!_ 9._. lsw.l.. 9'.i§€FbE,�.L
6' u € :. t.. t''',
III-;.qq3^ , .9,, {E{fi�43s 3 94,g
I-03h..: i�i9, d$if L..-S3-..-�`h...
$'�€j s`E$ t j} € ; ,l, 1�
� i-i'N''1j11ii,,�5,1;87
,...Ii..-.aN,.y4.1.• :.3i±iU:3A6i.,r
._` I 2; ;61E, BI
�;: ,6 1 2Q,,
;..,3§..i :.ir!.ii>$'.._
CLAY -daily
2003-03-16 23:59:00
58.55
69.44
866.00
0. 70
6.575
.-n�'LAY'°dai7V
-� �•..,�fi::i
2003-03 1723 59;00.i'S965
6 t a.f.:s=,s. 3�a.e. :, 6Fe6Cr'E; i.: 33 .6t{E
.e�g¢eI€�,iA6f€Ere€s:aeEEF€efiEt .trl:6stfFe €3.s;
��,67ti17!
o{e ¢e,.ifrEl`6�4�Y'�`� .iE.}.dFf� € e: •r�i!
,.:,94000,�'
�ib���fx�e4..:�ir39vs€Eai,.�,
0000,
�(��%i�S�is3,E�. ;�i�i�t.<P4 �:,.atiCFaYi
E.q{s�40t569��
LAY_ ai y
2003-03-18 23:59:00
59.86
1 68.02
942.001
0.000
0.552
E
... LAtY:- ai y
E t h
20 3 �. 3 �19.23 5 0
€t=?i t. �� 1 7 �;3 Iti; 13" I
F 1 F ::� 50 7„!
iit;Y gat iY,i iii33 €r, €i
: �,ii ,.;.. ,,
t[,
- •E r j@t Sj i'
82 ,i
kE 3 3} EI �1jF d $ g (l.I , :1 �
!1' I jai $ ii V 7
hSN�'i�', a Y x-.+'...!. :1
#f "7
���,� ,',,5 3 �;
..'
LAY ai y
2003-03-20 23:59:00
52.99
6 .11
761.00 .
1.690
0.624
;Ca,:1 _Lt EA. s sNYii9fl,. .,'d:kt.
CLAY - daily
$kei?.�.»NNStE99 c aP:,-61,F bb FieFF
2003-03-22 23:59:00
E�}3t'>i�"ii:�r�§����§€`f ti=i:, <4it .'1§,
61.84
Y.: <��Yd#�•t€ F§:}Yji":i:�i i i
71.92
6bEEt11:,:' 19rS ''.il f<,":.i'
914.00
UdE-(S1
iS E ��$t<€j;i�.33.33.8'.OIai E�0
0.000
f:`i�'.�4�;E71393ji:�_j$
0'Ft{L?:6911�3 Y:'
0. 95
C rrfrA. ,E al .t,
- a hxR''h. a
20 3"03' 2323 9 0„,::Es;i�
aw' krl :rj. _._4 M V; :M1I af, ..1'-' HMu ...&.. ,
Ea({fs:5
::y �, A E-..•f'ini .E14eq,.f'.
��iE€ OOOi,
t r e,a:.�_.P A ,ee
09 58`.
,.i�3>=r�i?'!ii{t47E€B�,
[CLAY - daily
2003-03-24 23:59:00
57.61
70.02
821.00EE
0.000
0.626
CLAY; dailytE
.. ,., , r..,e , ,...¢ n„{�a._.f
CLAY -daily
E� 1," €
2003 03 25�2315900!
:^3,"�,€ni .S.F 1-:.•,J ea .... n•,9�n5,.:, E,
2003-03-26 23:59:00
_,S,•' 1:A. ¢ § ...F 4•€
4'@?;k;t�it€ii60:SS�.
ll.Ss .. _.i., �,E4r ° a =`.%l.
64.24
b Ftl F:. b$ $ � [.E § (
�tu11 r9,lll 74.17i
Vt , f 5. h-� 4;a,.
77.99
_ e��yfr.3 E ,' € 9
1 $86200�
•�x�.,�,lu._aa , a;.et
935.001
F 8 85 F f'l 6€
4i{ 7ti 4r:��i0 OQ
.,€4. i,�
0.0001
ISit ,, ,1E0 615
7 .�'iiil' iwd •:_,h°.url$
0.599
at Y',200
..;E.a. r , e"?:. ,.',•'.-- xl ,:rs,....,...
CLAY_ at y
027�23 59i00
. S3 3Snr
2003- 3-28 23.59:00
�771t'1,11,
1 60.12
73.71
N?!P8E6ti9§18 00�GAY'
882.001
{ >f.(�t-•-, `�0 Er:000,(}
0.020
'€':. ;'}0 595fi'
0.579
'CI A,Y ddi,1-2003a-E03�29=2i3:59
'r>
LAY_ ally
00E
-.. l�r :.i.i;..ui. ,:i{r �...m.se:i"1i.
12003-03-30 23:59:00
;''_;,,,t,,, <, 7t7,7<,
a _:1M 2t,kh,i:ti.kx#S, r_fr
44.62
i.11,,' F `76'0
IkL.r. (1'FY€n�t
67. 6
`949 OOt`
79.00
�E,3; `f;,i` i,10$a1'gp
�0.710
� :3`f'0'57394
0.724
t• -.. -§.. .�
LAYa, all , ,
'i,eil9e.d30}r68S ,7-w e.i€6}66t(1�
LAY daily
•. !f '. N'r,k ..'.�- • w•.f;'' Y'
LAY_ ai y
r..0 W r f€EE@. '
2003;,03:{31 23 59:004y
E.er,J13?.933.-8BI6EFitFFPF",§":£i4iv�s«S,IIS :'. ti§{((4tL'.'..'..i
2003-04-01 23:59:00
2003=0 "02�23 59 p,',{
llFwFE:'`.{i
2003-04-03 23:59.00
66. F ,e(e . eEi - 5
€.}; ($4�'3{@
�G'?iSh9�.3Aii'J
53.08
t:JJ,�y : 65',3�E�
1�'.
1 67.89
4 a6 4 it {',. Bffe461(- _.
, q;33 9 ,ry{@ 47,0
.�9T?�i�.bi.N.%4B3[ii 7U.i�.:9}133':9YSflB:iiE
69.44
�f; ,` f" b ""W78 35�''"
�ge,
80.96
{ _ 11: _. 63
30
i€�!,F"a...iE_Fis�
759.00
842'�OO:a
892.00
i §b3. fiYE•.'�.(g 6 §LE i
, ,,, 19 {QQ44�'{(5000
E
0.000
1, "['� rp 1'0'�000;'y
0.000
EEC .f {3y 0.809:i$
ir�e,.9
Fell
0.735
.655
,bi4-F�f,e611 e'�4
0.615
f iE
L
CLAY ally
%i
2003-04 05 23.59:00
9s F• E'
79 78E
65.52
g 3:.§: 9 E•
r€i §=ti g, ;fit: s i;78:. 8
76.69
- "§ i Y €€
I =F •951 0.,.;
970.00
$ i kE'
,6, 5 �,�sg,b,i6F i�i :0.00¢'
0.070
I @
SE ;::, {:. s;
0.592
CLAY"dail
ii3 _ �-�.!.^^,} = rtlik,�i; .
CLAY -daily
2003'=04t.46,r23 59 00.'
P:rePstbF3d4�€?ki€'i�S99Ca':, eElu.: fr e •¢tnF§UE %.r. ,i
2003-04-07 23:59:00
kE "'E58'28'{�
�i��. �i����iEi :: � i3 e.9ii' �_
42,83
_ ,:" 67€"426
k a�:li ,�?�E � �i9489 Yr r1��:6Pb°:�i
45,91
`y;97Q 00:
Fii�"� i9x�bi6ti� :?3lfix68a �
956.00
"E'ee.E1t$''Y"1�"31p 0140d"{99"�Tirf03618a
€�:��4;i�+d�E€E+%� �'� .d3d4dAEfllf lii4i�d E
0.780
i€!?�d -:F$E€ `F'6iSja48:eee
0.734
L$AY�� ai72
,,.w.. --� y,
03= 4.08t23 5900',,Et;;;$,,°43
. , .::. ,k !,{.k. �a:wd .1 «
g;,„
1... E..rl$'.§ ...,.
1�;,=,F=14=70�
Ate.. lt, M,t,IN:.Y..M
gy4959€'00;E9V�,,,E�.�s
{. ,tk5!mtx; AA�,:E,�:'I
{§;039'§,:,0,1,4,
SIEr;.a:
CLAY_dat y
2003-04-09 23:59:00 1
42.18
44.51
1 953.001
1.010
0.8 G
LAYr dail"'{E
20,�y113'04`."1023:5, 00,
9ikl.>6�rE8r9, F,': .1€F SE:F33333i„"WRE�!
r{(ry : f;},Iy},:45:649EE{(j}@
f$.',.�EIE$$tSj3:si Ei E'4E4�i[GVi:SiN€iSsii:`i:€E,11{EEit{1,-.!SINfi
E§}$;`'ti§ 'SO:€56
'`§.'s..4Y-.149e6tl?IctliS,�t��vle:r�:
'(__9 900;a'
E,9� y6 ,,1E400E:t;+$
$e0 g76g.
IL�AY daily
2003-04-11 23:59:00
45.25
50,56
950.00
0.010
0.879
LAYti it j
LAY ai y
W�
200 04 1223ffr�$Ekr�,�{a.,�r�€�',�,@„s
r'dh
2003-044-13 2359.00
t9" it
61.74
,,s�'741�''"'�n
4Eiria.r4�,
75.02
{�f,,�F� n
1 ll Ib, 6PELd�§,1°:
974.00
{4$'W O.00p
y" i� �,€
�h6 ?<s �67L -�1F shk3_rIIF€EbY
0.000
p�0°g34,`
tj,,.y�
8[idi�:-fl yH 4�1_i,
0.757
�((t �p
CLAYS€curl: '
Asu� ._:'6,;:,1iii ,. ,a f'._',. Y;
2003-04@R14 23':5900,
1{, ,....r 1•.::3!4,j fs ,t;. ,Aal r._.{-,q+;.:4..$' :
ii i{4i �ip
ro�tii fp.':.6!.c'Klki s. u�aG. `f
NitaE,?6i6 4G� t6 tE
^aSNIR±,I'L4�,`�4�itl atkrllluul
E. �E E"€:F,��sl:'
{E- p $
�1t1�:F; 9�O,0oeya
$a
} }�tS F n' o00
kr>tih�t'�Ftk;
bt1S1$SF$§aE$ a
E o 07
CLAY -daily
Y
CLAY -daily
2003-04-15 23:59:00
2E€:0€1 <Fvi3: iv-90'. p4�9€E c6u1EEtti3-,..3 it3 3it9[5`t!OE€$QfroE :rL
2003-04-17 23:59:00
65.59
82,;.3§ si a.I !§}F..:�
62.58
80.01
i!!$Y s'�<SiCi1F3:§i�tr}4 a::$}.iEt!
78.84
958.00
i91E1Fi?E }..3@4a4C4t.f •E§F§3�
968.001
0.0001
�cri9eS.: €$.,. c1il}.§i4�9! .E4.a.a.43,Of ifsl§iii
0.0001
0.671
'�j;••..4.. I.r9e3A41 .'3°bi
0.633
., LA, ar y
A,1 Y_k
§' E
2003� 4 8 2 59:p0��
,.,i,. <"; .i ,. .N -. ;11:...1 ',.'i 51x T➢
S'j?` s$j i {I1 F 9§'
=1 .,Ps 1 ,��so Y00'f$'4,x�a55@?f
I� 31.Ii§t i ,.{S.. S ;fr
SE�
kfr {
ss�,9i�1§.F=.�.�
k q s.:::.-
1fe,0 02a
r 1 ti.
0 68204
LAY ai y
2003-04-19 23:59:00
52.56-1
58.17
884.00
F 0.0001
691
1 of 2 5/13/03 11:07 AM

http://storm.meas.nesu.edu/cgi-bin...avg=on&submit=COMPILE+OBSERVATIONS
vA§�911;a�YHN•itsk18E8aa1$9'90.E',1,t6dF�iLxt,k'.-.-a!,.;33`iti.:rSJ
70IO2J.
j}���;a�9773:�00
',vi?v`Sh41§
FE $. , i,� ? �L 0 000}
Y�I!$1§$Patl7ia°3i
'' {74„OY670T
CLAY_ at y
2003-04-21 23:59:00
61.661
75.02
982.00
0,3201
0,644
A? at y
'UF.: ",-..E
20 3 4 22 23 500
�,1�1. 5
fi,7 w17
i, 3100
F
'0 45'h
LAN�a!Fy 1
CLAY ,dal
kxjEEa , YiwaH-4cr. .fl..� y€;€..
12663-64-D 23:59:00
2003 04 24y,23 5 :00,
5 .39
.�,°>y;.. ;�;
g 58.pE78 {
�€ .lit*t.-§�id•. 6{I l `6¢;�t63i
69. 99
, �P,,P ',';,.
€Ei I 11§ 1}71..334,.,
��ger§'np+§
940.00
{ . t 2§40E
, 85 (}j
�$�1._fh 7d9 4Stik YA a§ Si"i
0,0001
,p€�a�F§":0000
d.t y =
4 iE3 E°� i$ i§?.ii >; L $.-
0. 6
��k, g 0l6'4�:
�.{E :t} . ,d.
:: �{ibiit § 4A1 i..ri, 6-I'e
CLAY -daily
20 3- 4-25 23:59:00
5 .74
2 46
8 4 00
0 210611
0.638
;f Ey, ITI,t
fu. Y ilr'a^1ii�
CLAY -daily
LAY�JJdaii
C t Y l y
.t$ii}.,{ ;.: , k.. Hi :....d �
CLAY -daily
;.9.
{i LA$Yi�'!' a1 V °
idz"*..•-; ..si'O.Y
2003-04-27 23:59:00
.�
200 4 2R 3 5(y�
3 8t2 V✓.n0#
I;.3tlt.o_r-iE,kl. S$ P=°4i4,va¢Is3ekY..�Siilf:,ba e7r6EiEE7P {j .
2003-0 -29 23:59:00
§
2 '- 4` 7 `((23 S ��
i, nl1 V„�dEH3""0d"d�,iY12,a-...I..€ha<:i„ ,FrA
62.80
,c11 11 �5 ^-5
I. S�Fi 3?3 !}3 , ./ !..£✓ E
�N..1.ieii?i�Sii'...:{F3ti1:FR,i4§ESE,N+E
70.41
�'F
0�1 E£ § E € {j)f' . 7,2€?
;!ilf",kik°a1 .si,EE-.iii+{.,tivA➢:"lLEi4.4�eYl:Y!`li!lF:G.A,ll�iiSa@i!'1lY..N?'•1§i4iiil,SliWtfWhQ��!d"-.1§z.
.,,.,,�...'74.53
ff + ff 7R 58
3f.F1 .s ?EI i _V
F�aEbe�6��i��P6€i�44i€six F. r,i.i3331i9a=,
1 83.821
t q [
,4t ���E;'ti{'i9�"3��3 #7tyttC9j9' 4°:J 2
850.00
�-948:00':E
�((� E
-11i11�"3iii{P§ .P€hH.s,s>i3394.[
956.00
fj'
i'dR !2 51:' V O
0.010
E , `!}0 000§
{q i11�� E6�E k§ E
€.i.�b�§r�i� i
0.000
i , E
sty _��?: 9$e�@ i � p }0 �?
0.651
�6
� {0 633'S°
y P ;�E
t�F`ri6§iek°c r i8Y4is i[k.=:d ,
0.601
.'E facd@ �Yt
g? IIII ! ii �90",5
CLAY -daily
2 03-05-01 23:59:00
9.53
79.77
972.00
0,0001
0.552
�!
CLAY�{'dai1 `
2043;'05"02' 23:59 00�
i,t�' `17 � 71 24
� �T 86107
.',E?3ri4Fir;t t
, t9 1:00
��
°. +01000
�r c6€r €1i� E „Y:.ree�6.e�€+.. ie P
4�>f 0 541
..>9iP,1}i:F'1tt6i,.6€$r?.1?ii$!t
CLAY_dat y
2 3-05-03 23:59:00
63.59
68.85
1008.00
0,537
6 t l .€.. t.. .. ....��
LAY P a1 y>>:,
=Y i _?%i$?v_�7 «> 'S,. .FA.
.. t ° il!3 - • {
2 03 ,MS . 0 23 59 00,
, < _ili_ _r4PP•••e {EF i.. E3ini� d:, €. '3ii,�AF^.;xtlf7t�d$
€;! t. t't 44 q{ ',:F� EE :1: !{
[¢€jjSEek E ¢¢ 66�[[j6€ 5 4 A .
i3P197,i.9a9.e.399:11fixil Pdlla_7P9dT�=r. �.
63p821 §P. {. •gpit�($"�8 F ".. :3
y{ f p , 3 A@€{ y{
,79.I?i.l§i� :§:i4f liF 1a9.9a:C �..., it.
t91.6.€.,3 E 4�11(�11/t�1 E'
gi3tlj6Q0 M}U �ig
iy. i..t_?;1ik`7.FF..!Lr'
f0�.(0�10
t�°p 3 �'i9$3 �ESI€$��B£w.#i�tft'f i 0 £El}
. is.!#f §
E: 5(;'£§P 0�5 :4E:E
$f ij 3i1
7t'FI§:i. F�;33§TM
CLAY_ ai y
4 dt 4'' k
CLAY�dai,y
2003-05-05 23:59:001
t l
�00=�OSIµ,., t��q s, 04".:1,
54.23
F.Y § -
8'"
60.551
FE { �.
i��t�}F$�E7 �88��00�t.,20
995.00
0.110
9
0.568
d iH 1 a�
CLAY -daily y�
2003-05-07 23:59:00
73.40
84.42
853.00
0.000
0.524
ail 'f
yEIF?
Y�ai y�
2003'.-05 �08jj'E23 �5900�
..➢i<. 3Hia.33Psx:R:EEE{Er$. _.:i3:asi$3d SEEP e€k.i'si.:q.4�1Fi;'.3P§g
2 03-05-09 23:59:00
(9({t,E!4��;€€9 ��M,y' t.t,71{7! 6.1�1,k3sE;P;
.?t� 94P933: i3i lt!?i? ?i!%:1�13§.,.s"t
79.001
3�9 �16E�888176E903
"t T?$is :i�?F.�4::i ;4i3j3a1,.sP�fl,88`2,Y.i`.
90.10
00�;
..§!}{3ii;9i46 €k'il§{:iP}9-°:ereB§{�
1 947.00
�7{} �I �1•'�;600009
ia�.iP Pl9§Es : ? 4,14i',L':i8''�Yif9 iki
1 0.000
as "y;'�;0SO;I�tN,i
�3 $ i;4°`$4. &939if43i .:i:t1414
0.485
CLAY;i;dai
91 ... Y
2093 `05 1023 5900jj,uE
i�t.. , rRr'h.Sa w'y%5...
. r», 9 y. id�T�lll� NN
i t
dj7$ 7�1t�
. Si 4i3a.t#. 1r.n
ti
d
I a1�g:§� ga:1€89.87<+941'.00,
iN3ki. l.lte. t.,.,..ii .. 3'.isu'P,�!il.,.
h>r-,.-'1-..1. +I tMd�:M:'�.1,
I9d
P xP, E 333 P.. 4 E EE
§ „.�i �Cp 000
F1E...dSL'm.. K!#
t ¢ g : � y
P ��,q„� 4 2:
d I�Ica,�'hrMRt n:,.iNSHSx
CLAY_ ai y
2003-05 11 23:59:00
77.95
87.03
951.00
0.00010.458
Y ai
s..i.sic'e3,-,««�..3x.,.yJ,°„_
20 3=05 1N3 59 �00
-a'.;tictt9r:�i�E••i., et'_t.e.,9i_kii>'�6h€t'R6aPe}}4{ES?i6�uaz§P.E�i�
E
w'i t ,i 70 77
��, " PF t ,�
- �, U
§79 E7.
a.Fn:�.�5e.§r�,taa.Frx4u-,
r gw955*00 {
�L�»i$d .�.,di:ili:.
,� �, 0 000�
v9 �P iI
> �»'71i�,4'rE$fa%fl?�4i3i§ui,aa[9lN:Csk.s'��F',`["1a.itt
Y, ` '4t458
_66'rkS:3iz�i�
Max
79.00
90.10
1FO KOO
1.690
0,879
Min
40.36
44.51
570.30
0.000
0.458
Average
60.46
70.94
910.75
0.14
0.63
um
3566.95
4185.61
53734.50
8.09
37.3
Clicke fort a
2 of 2 5/13/03 11:07 AM

A
Facility Name:
High Freeboard Evaluation Form
Facility Number: &/ - I�
Person Completing Form: 4,4 R O. 'at Date Form Completed: is a
Date Information Due to DWQ: r Date information received
Extension Due Date: 51 z - 3
Information Received:
Current Freeboard Yes No Level(s) (in inches)
Freeboard Levels for Previous 12 Months Yes ✓ No _ Incomplete
Spraying Records for Past 12 Months Yes _ No Incomplete
Rainfall Records For the Past 12 Months Yes _ No , NIA _ Incomplete
Cropping and PAN Information Yes L No Incomplete
Summary of Actions Taken to Restore the Needed Freeboard(s)
Yes _ No _ Incomplete �4�—
Description of Water Conservation Measures In Use
Yes — No — Incomplete d,3xf
An updated POA if the Freeboard is still in Violation Yes _ No X-N/A
Detailed Description of Actions Taken or Proposed to be Yes _ No _
Taken to Prevent Future Freeboard Violations IncompleteJar' desTU
Date High Freeboard Level Was First Reported to DWQ by Producer ) 3 D k4
Date of First Violation from Farm Records Jzs °3
Items proposed in the Plan of Actions to Bring the Facility Back into Compliance
Pump and Haul Remove Animals Delay Restocking
Add Land to NMP Add Application Equipment
Spray when site is acceptable Others (Please Specify) _
HFEF 5-12-03
1

,51- )z7
Information for Lagoon(s) or Storage Basin(s) (Add Additional Pages as needed)
Lagoon -L/ Storage Basin (Check as Appropriate)
Lagoon or Storage Basin Identifier F,y cP-f- dJ - /
Design Total Days of Storage for the Facility (From CAWMP) }
Stop Pump Level for lagoons or the bottom of the storage basin (inches) s3 3� C
Lowest Liquid Levels Reported in the month of: b, ov. y S
Month Date Level (in inches)
August lb +
September z-Z/
October v ►
November I `i
Required Minimum Freeboard (red zone in inches): '7 of
Does the Minimum Include a Chronic Rainfall Factor Yes No ,/
Recorded Freeboard Violations
Nl
Date
Level (in inches)
Date POA
Submitted
os
- -Z
{
t
r S
17
--V
zs
r�
!r
zr
z3
iz
r5
3a
J%
,S
/Z.
7
7W
S
/'S
7-
o
5 or 30 day
HFEF 5-12-03 2

Cz�
Facility PAN Balance From the CAWMP (pounds)
-17$ 14, ^C ) - ss8z
�-r3 ` " ) z ro-790
Did the Facility Comply with its NMP for the Past -12 Months Yes / No
If No, What Violations Were Identified:
From the review of the facilities irrigation records, does it appear that the facility made
optimal use of the days when irrigation should have taken place. If not, please explain:
If the Facility has
when:
Water Conservation Devices, what devices were installed and
What Actions have been taken or proposed to be taken by the Facility to Prevent Future
High Freeboard Violations (check appropriate items):
Better Management of the System
Add Additional Storage Volume
Add Lagoon Covers
Add Additional Land Application Sites
Add Additional Irrigation Equipment
Install Water Conservation Equipment
Reduce the Number of Animal at the Facility
Change Type of Operation
Others (please explain):
Pf�q 'k-w
�1-
HFEF 5-12-03 3

If applicable, recorded rainfall data from August 2002 through April 2003 at
Facility # 51-1 Z7 :
Month
Amount of rainfall
per month (in inches)
# of days it rained
per month
August 2002
Out of 31 days
September 2002
Out of 30 days
October 2002
Outof3l days
November 2002
Out of 30 days
December 2002
Outof3l days
January 2003
Out of3l days
February 2003
Out of29 days
March 2003
Out of3l days
April 2003
Out of 30 days
Total Rainfall
Out of274 days
Commentjs_ from Producer: E 6
_ �Q,Mf� 0�a,• l
. , , -�.'- .. 7. — a. N 1 ,ter I , .
Comments by Reviewer: st
HFEF 5-12-03 4

United States Department of Agriculture
4w.NRCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
County Agriculture Building
806 North Street
Smithfield, NC 27577-9998
919-934-7156 Ext. 3 Phone
919-989-5659 Fax
February 3, 2003
NC DENR
Raleigh Regional Office
Attn: John Hunt
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Glen Boyette Farm
Facility # 51-127
Johnston County
r
Dear M nt:
As I informed you by phone, Dean Bingham, NRCS Area Engineer, Chris Smith, Civil
Engineering Technician, and myself met -with Glenn Boyette on December 19, 2002 to
reevaluate his existing irrigation system in regards to making a wettable acres
determination. The basis for this meeting was a "Notification for, Wettable Acre
Determination" issued to Mr. Boyette by your office on September 20, 2002.
After reviewing the irrigation system with Mr. Boyette, Mr. Bingham did not think the
existing system was adequate to uniformly apply effluent in a timely manner on the farm
and recommended the system be replaced. Since Mr. Boyette informed us that he is
going to replace the existing system with a mini -gun system using Nelson 100 guns in
early 2003, Mr. Bingham recommended that a wettable acres determination not be
performed on the existing system.
Mr. Bingham did ask me to revise Mr. Boyette's WUP to allow him to pump on the rye
planted on land owned by his mother, which is adjacent to his farm. Calculations show
that this additional acreage will allow Mr. Boyette to reduce the waste in his lagoon to an
acceptable elevation. I reduced the field acreage by 15% on all fields to estimate what
the wettable acres would be.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

-Glenn Boyette- Page 2
Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Boyette's revision for your records.
It is my understanding that he is going to have Vernon Parker do his irrigation design and
wettable acres determination.
If you have any questions, please call me.
5incer iy,
k A. Ferg on
District Conservationist
Enclosure

.IN
GLENN BOYETTE -
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520 U . ,BAN 2 8 2003
i
January 25, 2003
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
NCDENR
1628 Nail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Subject: RESPONSE
Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility #51-127
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
I am in receipt of your letter dated January 13, 2003 in reference to "Notice of Violation".
This notice was received on January 18, 2003. In response to Mr. John Hunt's inspection,
I provide the following information.
It was my understanding after the inspection on September 13, 2002 that a wettable acre
determination needed to be completed before I could continue pumping from the lagoon.
After being informed of this, I contacted Mark Ferguson, District Conservationist with
the Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District. I received the Nutrient Management
Plan from the District Office on January 8, 2003. Upon receipt of this document, I
immediately started pumping on the rye cover crop. As of January 25, 2003 the lagoon
level is 24 inches.
On January 3,2003 during Mr. Hunt's visit, he stated that the level in the lagoon was
elevated to 18 inches. This was a result of two house pits being emptied and re -filled.
On January 4, 2003 during a routine service inspection, the Service Technician recorded
the level at 20 inches, an acceptable lagoon level.
It was my understanding throughout this process, that Mr. Hunt and Mr. Ferguson
communicated by phone in an effort to resolve the wettable acre determination. Based on
my understanding of the regulations governing lagoon management and based on Mr.
Hunt's September 13, 2002 inspection, I assumed I would be in violation to pump since
the waste management plan was in question.

Page Two
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Any help regarding this issue would be greatly appreciated. I look forward to hearing
from you.
Sincerely,
&,--- 55z&-
Glenn Boyette
C: Mark Ferguson, Johnston Soil and Water Conservation Disrtict
Jerry Hairr, Carroll's Food

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division.of Water Quality
January 13, 2003
CERTIFIED MA
RETURN RgCEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Dear Mr. Boyette:
NCDENR/
{,, NORTH -MRO FNA DEPARTMENT QR
ENVIRONMENT AND NArURwL RE50URCE5
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Recommendation for Enforcement
Glen Boyette Farm
Facility #51-127
Johnston County
On January 3, 2003, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a follow up of the September 13,2002 compliance
inspection of the subject animal operation. As a result 'of the
inspection, the following violation was observed:
The waste level was estimated at 18 inches whigh is greater than that
allowed by the permit. The level was above the elevation of the
waste level gauge.
The animal waste permit issued 2/28/00 includes several conditions
that must be met:
III. MonitoringXonitoring and Reporting Requirements
6. Regional Notification
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate
Regional office as soon as possible, but in.no case more than 24
hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the
following events:
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon greater than
or equal to that required in Condition V (3) of the permit.
V. General Conditions
3. The maximum waste level in lagoons shall not exceed that
specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for
lagoons must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage
to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional
1 foot of structural freeboard.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276WI628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 1 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Mr. Glenn Boyette:1/13/03
Page Two
Please respond to this notification within 10 days of receipt. You should
include in your response the actions that you will take to address this
violation including a Plan of Action to obtain and maintain adequate freeboard.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection please call at (919) 571-
4700.
Sincerely,
- 1"a
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston soil and Water Conservation District
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
September 20, 2002
Division of Water Quality
CERTIBIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUEaTED
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Determination
Dear Mr. Boyette:
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT ANo NAwuRAL ResQURGES
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre
Animal waste Management System
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility #51-4e9 i Z7
Johnston County
During the inspection conducted on September 13, 2002, Mr. John
Hunt from the Raleigh Regional Office determined that the Waste
Utilization Plan for this operation had been changed. The changes in
crops and the irrigation system have resulted in significant changes in
the number of irrigated acres for the facility. Only the acres that are
wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste
application. Any acreage within the plan that can not be reached by
waste application equipment can not be used as part of your plan.
Your plan may have overestimated the number of acres actually
receiving a uniform application of animal waste. Therefore, some or all
of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates set in your
Certified Animal waste Management Plan.
in order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated
Technical Specialist to have him or her conduct a Wettable Acre
Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must be one
that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to
conduct Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialists with
the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service, the Soil and Water Conservation
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX (919)571d700
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

page 2
Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the Division
of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special designation.
You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received
this designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System
must be made and the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be
returned to DWQ within the next 60 days. If the needed modifications
are not made and if the form is not returned within the required time,
DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this
facility into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty
assessments, permit revocation, and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of
the Wettable Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the
address listed on the form. Please note that both the owner and the
Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all the
Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste
Utilization Plan must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of
Soil and Water Conservation staff will review all documentation during
their annual visit to your facility. An additional copy must be kept
on file at the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office.
Please note that if you install or modify your irrigation system,,a
designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer must also
sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
If you have any questions regarding this notfification please call
John Hunt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
CC: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DWSC - RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO files

Lu
M JUN 1 2 2D0�
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
June 10, 2001
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Response
Notice of Violation
Glen Boyette Farm
Facility #51-127
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In response to the inspection conducted on my farm, I contacted Mark Ferguson, District
Conservationist, Johnston County, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, for
assistance in developing a plan to correct the situation regarding the vegetation for the
lagoon. Mr. Ferguson and I met on June 8, 2001 and walked the area around the lagoon.
He has agreed to assist me in developing and implementing a plan suitable for this area.
Mr. Ferguson will be contacting you on this matter. He can also be reached at (919) 934-
7156. I will notify your office upon completion of the development and implementation
of a lagoon vegetation plan.
incerely,
i
Glenn Boyette

b
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
t 4 VWA
NCDENR
NORTH C^,RoLcm& Mmom mEw of
ENVIRONMENT Alto NAruRwL FW-souiices
Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL -
RETURN RECEIPT. REQUESTED
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Subject: Notice of Violation
Glen Boyette Farm
Facility #51-127
Johnston County .
Dear.Mr. Boyette:
On, May 8, 2001, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal. Waste Management Regulations. As a result of the
inspection, the following violation was observed:
The animal waste permit dated 2/28/00 includes several
conditions that must be met:
A protective vegetative cover shall be established
and maintained on all lagoon embankments..-. Lagoon
areas shall be accessible and vegetation sha11 be
kept mowed.
Since August 1997 there have been ten inspections
and/or operation reviews conducted for this facility that
have specified improvements needed for the vegetation for
this lagoon. Please respond within fifteen (15) days of
receipt of this notification to indicate the practices that
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NG 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycletill D% post -consumer paper

0
Mr. Glenn Boyette; 5/18/01
Page Two
you intend to implement to correct this situation. Also
a copy of the freeboard log that is required to be
maintained for this facility was requested at the time of
the inspection. This has not been received. Thus a copy
of the freeboard log from the time the log was begun to the
present and copies of any records of wastes applications
for the same period should be included.
Enclosed you will find a copy of a form to change the
registration of the change of integrator. Please complete
the form and submit it to the address indicated. The
Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
enc.
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Carroll`s Foods, Inc.
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

Daily w�liws for March
f. .
http://www.ne-climate.ncsu.edu/agn...wr12001/March/clay_twr_032001.htm1
Central Crops Research Station NC MnS WIPather
13223 U.S. 70 West Cli'mkd'e Neft,
Clayton, NC 27520-2127
March 2001
Daily values for March, 2001 Click on the day for hourly values for that day
Ma3l M
mmil',
LI
01
're,
ILIE"I'Ll"'I
E00
FmQ
Ii =4
01141077 =07
413--'.
LEIII�2M
75,EM =ry'7 ' EE 1514017"C�7748E,7,
,3
L4 3
.0
.os
PEA 0
P57"', , 0 7
a 04,
0
I E,
=T$'I 01,
Li
01
MOEM��=mm
=T$'I 01,
Li
01
MOEM��=mm
C)
�O'�-ff- '--�7.7� ''' 25.9 g2r�53-7 46.0 ' "W`7 O. 7�
1 of 2 5/14/01 11:02 AM

Daily vales for March
http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/agn...wr/2001 /March/clay_twr_032001.htm1
This data is preliminary and no quality control check has been done. Please consult the staff at State
Climate Office for further details.
Data used should be cited in the following way:
"Information was provided by State Climate Office of North Carolina at NC State University"
This page was updated on 9,April 2001 at 6:31 hrs.
P?
eA
2. aZ
1 0
1 ., 3
2 of 2 5/14/01 11:02 AM

0--6
1e
e
�-e
-e
ee
0co
QQ
_9
W,
- J,
�- -C
�)-Ou
- C
t
df
47
h
Il
,h
�1
Al

S�).© /
89'0 -G
L J
1-7
o�
6Q•o
I.
0
G
0
pe

i---n - -�-�
�� '�X-T+-�Krav� � �tiCf^ a� � ��IJ� p� y � �v►�`""� ii�-�"ij 2-�-� —
1
V

N/
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
August 29, 2000
CERTIFIEDMAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Glenn Boyette
13B7 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Recommendation for Enforcement
Glen Boyette Farm
Facility #51-127
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
On, August 8, 2000, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a follow up of the June 6
compliance inspection of the subject animal operation. As
a result of the inspection, the following violation was
observed:
The waste level was estimated at 18 inches which is greater
than that allowed by the permit. The level was above the
elevation of the new waste level gauge and judging by the
staining on the inlet pipes, had been a few inches higher
within a few days prior the visit.
The animal waste permit issued 2/28/00 includes several
conditions that must be met:
III. 6. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the
appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but
in no case more than 24 hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following
events:
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon
greater than or equal to that required in Condition
V (3) of the permit.
MAI LINO A09)RE69: 1828 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1628
LOCATION: 3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, INC 27609
PHONE 919-571-A700 FA% 919-371-4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATWE ACTION EMPLOYER - 30% RECYCLBO/10% POST-CONHUMER PAPER

C
Mr. Glenn Boyette
Page Two
V. 3. The maximum waste level in lagoons shall not
exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for lagoons must not exceed the
level that provides adequate storage to contain the
25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional 1
foot of structural freeboard.
Please respond to this notification within 10 days of receipt.
You should include in your response the actions that you will take
to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
&--ieth
Schust r, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Ken York, Soil and Water Conservation'District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
Dogwood'Farms, Inc.
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality RALI;IGH REGIONAL OFFICE
June 19, 2000
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Glen Boyette Farm
Facility #51-127
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
On, June 6, 2000, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations. As a result of the
inspection, the following deficiencies were observed:
The animal waste permit dated 2/28/00 includes several
conditions that must be met:
A protective vegetative cover shall be established
and maintained on all lagoon embankments... Lagoon
areas shall be accessible and vegetation shall be
kept mowed.
If not already installed at the facility, a waste -
level gauge to monitor waste levels shall be
installed within 60 days of issuance of the COC under
this general permit. This gauge shall have readily
visible permanent markings indicating the maximum
liquid level at the top of the temporary liquid
storage volume, minimum liquid level at the bottom of
the temporary liquid storage volume, top of dam
elevations. Caution must be taken not to damage the
integrity of the liner when installing the gauge.
Waste lagoon levels shall be recorded weekly.
FrP-5r
J i J i'. IJ '- .
MAILING AOORE66: 1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1628
LOCATION: 3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIOH, NC 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER . 509E RECYCLEC1109E PORT-GONSUMISR PAPER

Mr. Glenn Boyette
Page Two
Please respond to this notification within 30 days of receipt.
You should include in your response the actions that you will take
to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
F� 1 Kenn Schuster/,' P . E .
Regi al Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Ken York, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr. T. Stevens, Director
February 28, 2000
Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1.387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
• 4n:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT�AND-NArURAL RESOURCES
IN = 7 2000
Subject: Permit No. AW1510127
Bo
yette oyette Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette
In accordance with your request received October 19, 1998 we are forwarding herewith Permit No.
AWI510127, dated February 28. 2000 to Glenn Boyette authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2005, and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements in
this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational
information will result in future compliance problems. Any increase in flow or increase in stocked animals
above the listed values in this permit will require a modification to this permit and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either flow or number of animals.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit.
This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447.
Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please ontact Sue Homewood at 919-733-
5083 extension 502.
Sin c y,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
NDPU Files
1617 Mail Service Censer, Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

� � 4
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
R
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
ANIMAL WASTE OPERATION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Glenn Boyette
Johnston County
FOR THE
operation of an animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system to serve the
Glenn Boyette Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of 'no greater than 2480
Feeder to Finish with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the request received
October 19„ 1998, and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting -data
subsequently fled and approved' by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2005, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system permitted under
this permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of
waste at agronomic rates to terraces and grassed waterways is acceptable in accordance
with Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Standards. If Glenn Boyette is in
compliance with the CAWMP and this permit, unintentional discharges as a result of a
storm event greater than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, will not be considered to be in
violation of this permit.
1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton NC 27520
Dear Glenn Boyette:
A
17 AM
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
10
PAtfi
< V rr
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping-
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 5l.,11 27
dohnston_County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
November 12, 1999
Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton NC 27520
I 'T V
lk �_w
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510127
Additional Information Request
Glenn Boyette Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County '
Dear Glenn Boyettte:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by
December 12, 1999:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) was written for surface irrigation. Please have a technical
specialist revise your WUP for subsurface irrigation.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information.
All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The
information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before December 12, 1999 or the Division will
return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be
considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the .
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
cc: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

J
`•: "
+R` NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
..,,,,:"," '
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
-
"
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
--
A.
Division of Water Quality
April 5, 1999
.,
�-; NMENR
s
Mr. Glenn Boyette
'
1387 Loop Road
`= JAM S:B.MUNTJR.;
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
QOVKRNOR
:.
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Glen Boyette Farm
!_--IIAYNtMCDCVIrr`
Facility #51-127
`'S[CRE'TARY t : r
,Y
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
On, March 23, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional
;s
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
'.fi•.
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Y:•''>
Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Hunt's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters
of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other
'
prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a result of
the inspection, the following deficiency was observed:
Your waste lagoon had approximately 15 inches of freeboard
4•. �.�
which is less than the amount required. Animal waste
lagoons are required to maintain enough freeboard so that
no discharge of waste water will occur to waters of the
State during any rainfall event less severe than a 25
-
year/24 hour storm.
A condition of the Certified Waste managment plan requires
operation and maintenace of the lagoon structure to
minimize the threat of erosion. There are two substantial
':.`"'_
areas without adequate vegetation to stabilize this
►' = '' w �=`�
structure from the possible threat of erosion.
Additionally, the channeling that has developed as a result
of the back wash from the sand filter system should be
` �'
stabilized and improved. There may be some cause for
r�
concern that inadequate diversion of rain runoff could be
entering the lagoon and should be evaluated and corrected
Y _
if found to allow surface flows into the lagoon.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUIT[ 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLSNA 27600
k
PHoNE 01 9-571 -a700 FAX 41 Y-571 -471 8
} - - -
AN EQUAL OPPORTUN STY / Air rIRMATIVa ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEOl10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Glenn Boyette
Page Two
V
Please respond to this notificaton within 30 days of receipt.
You should include in your response the actions that you will take
to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
ZKenneth Sch ter, P.E.
- Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Ken York, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

,, .
DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number s1 - i z 7
Farm Name: 6.stj,-J QauF213� _
On -Site Representative: GL!E JW &-yF_
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: _-T,
Date of site visit:, 3
Date of most recent WUP: -7 if 6
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility items) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E9 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: , -78 ___ pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
Dzz? SYSrc^n (AU— Ate.. - 1- c-rTV.D L ��a'/� )
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

DRAFT `
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999 `
Facility Number raj - LZj
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'-2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
1'l'Z-7J
b -3
9.3
5A
_ 6
11 1 1 1 1 -2.-s.5 1 1 11
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspectorlreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

. CANVMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date:
� Waste Utilization Plan; Date: ten'
7Amount of plant available nitro roducedlused annually (57�`� Ibs�
�7 Dominant soil series: wAb c,,LX-A.0 s
/ Crops to be grown: �;. ram €.s ��► sr�s �- w P��rs, Q�xr•�-'ems
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= }
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1193;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
_Z Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
/ Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Type of irrigation: Traveling Gun Solid -Set Small G ter Pivot Linear Move
Other (description): Jnry 'P s s� .
NRCS irrigation, parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1196) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1 /96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21196)
REQUIRED RECORDS effective 9/1/96
Ja.(fi! 91 Waste application records (IRR 1&2)
Annual soil sample reports for 1999
(Cu index: ) LAG_
(Zn index: )
PERMITTED FACILITIES
General Permit & COC on site
_ weekly lagoon level records
Waste analysis - date last taken
PAN lbs11000 gals. for structure #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2

FACILITY NUMBER (Z REVIEWER:
FARM NAME: DATE: -
Ty PE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN
POND -PAN
FarrowlWean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGN/VOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation:
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume ft3
Temporary storage volume ft3
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi):
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design .
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
ft. 15t 25 yr.124 hr. storm in.
ft. 2"d 25 y024 hr. storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard in.
ft.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
.5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 21, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED
enn oyette �T^
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton NC 27520
Farm Number: 51 -12'7
Dear Glenn Boyette:
OZ
IT
A
•
IT V 5
���
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAcrURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Glenn Boyette Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (601 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call at [phone] extension or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
cerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina S
Department of Environment, ' !MAI
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality T
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C) E H N
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 12, 1997
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested f�--
ATTN. Glenn Boyette
Boyette Hog Farm,
1
1387 Loop Road '' 4
Clayton, NC 27520
----�--'��"' Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Boyette Hog Farm
AR I Aii Johnston County
CL 97-001
Farm #: 51-127
fdvT1(lNAL Wr ICE._ -
Dear Mr. Jones:
I considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and my delegation under G.S. 143-215.6A(h) and hereby
modify the assessment of $1,000.00 to the total of $200.00.
Should you choose to pay the penalty, you may tender payment to me at the letterhead
address within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable to the
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these
matters. You may argue your, request before the committee and Division Staff will argue for full
payment of the initial assessment.
Should you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the
letterhead address on or before within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Your request will be
scheduled to be heard on the agenda of the next scheduled committee meeting and you will be
notified of the date and time. If a response is not received by the Division regarding this notice
then your request will be scheduled on the agenda for an upcoming committee meeting..
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

1
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions about this letter,
please feel free to contact Shannon Langley at [phone], extension 581.
cc: DWQ_Raleigb-Regional_Office _.
Enforcement file
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, dr.,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Attn.: Glenn Boyette
Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27520
Dear Mr. Boyette:
July 15, 1997
a
TOM
Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
Boyette Farm
Johnston County
Farm #: 51-127
CL 97-001
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalty levied against
the subject facility. This request will be reviewed and you will be notified when a decision is
made concerning the request.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor
Compliance Group
cc: °Raleigh-Regional-Office-w/attachment
Enforcement/Compliance - -- ___..
Linda Forehand w/3 attachments
P.O. gox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
�N FILE O. CG L- �I
CCo �
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling 0 0O - C)C for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does
stipulate that the farts are as alleged in the assessment document_
This the .15 day
ADDRESS
188r7 Loop RIA.
C_A-aq+cn N c' a Saco
Senn o e
RECEIVED
JUL Z 5 19974 TELEPHONE
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT UNff

i
July 5,1997
Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27520
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535 ..
Raleigh, NC 27626--0535
Re: Notice of Violation
Assessment Of Civil Penaliti(s
Certification for New or Expanded Animal Waste
Management Plans
As Per'15A NCAC 2H .0217(d)
Boyette Farm
Johnston County
CL 97-001
Dear Mr. Tedder:
This letter is in response to the " Notice of Violation Assessment
of Civil Penalities", which I received on June 6, 1997. In your
letter, you state that an approved animal waste management plan
certification was not received by the Division of Water Quality
before animals were stocked in my facilities.
On June 18, 1997, Kenneth C. York, District Conservationist, USDA,
submitted a letter to your attention explaining that in fact my
...facilities had been appropriately cetified and -.within ths--timeframe•
required by 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0217
(a)(1)(G). Therefore, I request that the civil penalty of $1000.00
assessed against me be dismissed.
Your consideration and assistance in this matter is very much
appreciated.
1ncerely, �•
Tenn Boyette iEDEIVED
JUL 7 1997
WATER QUALITY SECTION
DPERATIQN6 BRANCH

June 18, 1997
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
P O Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Notice of Violation
Glen Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27520
CL97-001
Dear Sir:
sUN 18 1991
i.t'fY
SECTION -
Glen Boyette called me with questions concerning your Notice of Violation letter dated
June 6, 1997.
The letter stated you were seeking $1000.00 in civil penalties for Mr. Boyette stocking
animals in his facility prior to your receiving his certification.
I believe his certification form was lost somehow. My records show that Mr. Boyette
came in March 15, 1994 to get his new hog operation certified. The lagoon was complete
but the disturbed areas were not seeded and mulched. I did not sign the certification until
the seeding and mulching was completed. This was done on June 20, 1994. I then mailed
the certification form in myself. Mr. Boyette had hogs stocked in the houses in June so I
noted that on the bottom of the certification form.
In March 1997, 1 received an updated list of all the registered livestock operations .in
Johnston County from Sue Homewood. Mr. Boyette's operation was not on the list. I
called Sue Homewood and informed her. She asked that I fax her a copy of the
certification form so she could add the Boyette operation to the list. After doing this, I
received another list of the registered livestock operations dated May 19, 1997. Mr.
Boyette's operation was on this list.
I don't know how this happened. I am enclosing a copy of the original certification form
and a Notice of Violation for, the same offense dated June 24, 1994.
If I can be of help in resolving this matter, please call me at 919-989-5381.
rAWT
Kenneth C. York
District Conservationist
cc: Glen Boyette
enclosures
CkdEI ED
JUIN ); 1997
WATER' QU h 1-Y SECTION
.OPERATIO1`46 BRANCH

WXST3 Lir'.2iAG =- M PLAN CEZT::?ICA;ION FOR NZW OR M:WMED FEEDLOTS
Please. ret = the Cc Isted form to tha Division of F-:vi_on.:..ental Management at
the addreas on t`aa rsveraa aide of thin fay.
Name of farm ,,Please rint}} - �-ZEii/4
Address /3� 7
✓ . G . 75ar/ Phone. No. S 5 Y `fU 7y
s County: ."�h`5%u�✓ _ _
,ate location: Latitude and Longitude-_-JE � 12r'j` L: -70' (required) Also,
please accach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Tie of operation JjKjjLe, layer, dairy, etc.) :_ S�✓rMEf�•-�v_ Q'�4�_i'/�.�_ ,,/
Design capacity (number of animals) _ ,� ��U
,average size of cperation (12 month population ayg.): 95740
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): oZ G.
aaamac.-area»a�a�a»a�aa�aaaaaaarxaAAoaaarsa�aaaae=aaaaaaaaaaa�saaaa�saaa=n��aoeaa
Tec_*--ical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm, named above
has an animal waste management plan t`_t meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haue peen verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity;Padequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stor=water runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
I,',a,_s or Technical Specialist (please Print) m_/I E/r/�7� �. jpl'�
Affiliation: - 6 o/L ,1 CT:E C-a-
Address (Agency) ; F67jg Ve /c hone No., FZ f-
Signature: „ Le Date.
aTaaaa :aRa aaaaafl�asaa�aaaaa�^fras: as Qf7�aasepa3a�tasasatsmaaaa�a�xt�e=aaaaaaaa
Owner/VAaMagar Agreemaat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that. any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we)- also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Nam■ of Land ;mar (Ple a Pri )
Signature: _ Date:
N=& of yaaager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: • Date:
'.o A: A change in land -ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DE*4 USE DNLY:ACIME—bl##

PRODUCER'CERTIFICATION OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
1, L: LC� _ certify that I (own, have access to) the
(producer)
following irrigation equipment:
TYPH IRRIGATION AND SIZE G�
--- (O''Tier Ur Cc�)
I further certify that, through the arrangements I have made concerning irrigation equ:pi„em. I
will he able to irripte as necessary according to my waste management plan.
Signature -v
Date
PRODUCER CERTIFICATION OF INTENT TO PLANT GRASS FOR
IRRIGATION
I, lr-, certify that I will plant the specified grasses
(produce
as outlined in my waste management plan at the next available seeding date. If this seeding
date is in excess of 6 months rrom the date I stock animals, then I will' provide a temporary
cover of small grain if needed for irrigation.
Signature
rod
Date I
OPTIONAL FORM 99 (7-90) _
FAX T�/RANSMITTAL rofpages 0, f/
To E'�OJr7 Frorn, ✓
pept.fAgency Phone
Fa=Iy���7�
KSN 7540-01-317-73. 5099-101
Fax op gt,- 9�'9� esf 7.1-
GENERAL SERVICES

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,Allwiff-X 1W
Health and Natural Resources « •
Raleigh Regional Office ®I
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IdaT
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
June 24, 1994
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, N.C. 27520
Subject: Notice Of Violation
15A NCAC 2H .0200
Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters
Stocking of Animals Without Certification
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
As the result of a citizen's complaint received by the Raleigh
Regional Office, Mr. Steve Mitchell met with you at your facility
on June 15, 1994. The information received by this Office
indicates that hogs were stocked. into this finishing facility prior
to the receipt of therequired certification.
The stocking of animals into a facility without certification from
the Soil and Water Conservation Commission is in violation of North
Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217 (NCAC 2H
.0217).
NCAC .0217 (H)(ii) states in part:
Plans must be certified by any technical specialist designated
pursuant to rules adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation
-.Commission, and -.the certificate submitted to the DE_M central
office on forms approved or supplied by DEM.
NCAC 2H .0217 (H)(v) states:
For new or expanded animal waste management systems requiring
a plan, plan approval must include an on -site inspection to
confirm that animal waste storage and treatment structures,
such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been
designed and constructed to meet the appropriate minimum
standards and specifications.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer poser

Page Two
Boyette Letter
NCAC 2H .0217 (H)(vii) states in part:
For new facilities, an animal waste management plan must be
approved before animals are initially stocked. For an,
expanded facility, an animal waste management plan must be
approved before the additional animals are stocked.
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6. provides that a civil
penalty of not -more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) may be
assessed against any person for these violations per day for so
long as the violation(s) continues, unless otherwise stipulated.
Due to the above mentioned violations, this Office requires that
you respond in writing no later than July 20, 1994, and provide any
and all information relevant to the stocking of this operation
without the required certification and reasons this Office should
not pursue enforcement activities, including civil penalties, as a
result of these offenses.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice Of Violation,
please contact Mr. Steve Mitchell or Mr. Tim Donnelly at 919-571-
4700.
cc: Johnston County He lth
Kenneth York, SCS,,//
stockpig.nov
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 8, 1997
Attn.: Glenn Boyette
Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27520
I J F=1
Subject: Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
Boyette farm
Johnston County
CL 97-001
Dear Mr. Boyette:
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalty levied against
the subject facility. However, your remission request was not accompanied by a completed form
waiving your right to an administrative hearing, which must be received before your request may
be processed. Please complete the attached waiver form and return it to the attention of Mr.
Shannon Langley at the letterhead address.
If you have any questions, please call Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.This
request will be reviewed and you will be notified when a decision is made concerning the request.
cc: Ra`leigti.Regionai-C fficceY
Enforcement/Co mpliance
Sne y,
tLSledge, Supervisor
Compliance Group
IFtL1 11977
DDINR RAl[ IGh
REGIONAL. Of ICE
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director.
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. GLEN B OYETTE
1387 LOOP ROAD
CLAYTON, NC 27520
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
A&4
I DEHNF=1
June 6, 1997
ar
ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES
Certification for New or Expanded Animal Waste Management Plans
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d)
Boyette farm
Johnston County
CL 97-001
Dear Mr. Boyette:
This letter transmits a civil penalty assessed against Glen Boyette in the amount of
$1000.00 and a Notice of Violation.
This assessment and notice is based on the following facts: An.approved animal waste
management plan certification was not received by the Division of Water Quality before animals were
stocked at your facility as required by 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H '.0217(a)(1)(G).
I conclude, Glen Boyette violated or failed to act in accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC
2H .0217(e). Therefore, I hereby assess Glen Boyette a $1000.00 civil penalty for this violation
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(h).
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must submit the required certification form and
choose one of the three following options concerning the civil penalty assessment:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (do not include waiverform). Payment of the
penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new
violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of.
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
P.O. Box 29535, .Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing
and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must
execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
ro
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with
the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the petition must be served on the Department as
follows:
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

'=;•
Failure to exercise one of the options above within shirt .days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please call Mr. Shannon Langley at (919)
733-5083, ext. 581.
Sincerely,
ram, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
-- ATTACHMENTS
cc: Judy -Garrett = Q'Regional:Supervisor.PR0
Compliancelaforcement File
Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
• Health and Natural Resources 1 •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor p E F-I N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 29, 1997
Mr. Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-127
Glenn Boyette Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
On May 12, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard: As a result of the
inspection the facility were found to be in compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
inportant responsibility of all animal waste producers, The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in•order to protect the natural resources of
the State. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your
cooperation. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerer
dy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Kenneth York, Johnston County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609N&O C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer,
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10°/6 post -consumer paper

10 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of inspection 3 2 T9 -
Facility Number 1 # Time of Inspection : QO 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�........ k.k,.A........N......,.sA....,.N,........N.x.N.r..r,.r,. N..r.N,N..r...,....N..r
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:Pr..`.`.................................................... (ex:1.25 for l hr 15 min)) Spent on Rey iew 'oo
................
t or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: ....... ...^`......... °.,Y e file -.r. County:...............J.'...^'.5...'..........................................
Owner Na1nc:.................. a N!` ................... �° x Phone No:
Mailing Address:....... 3.g. v ............... .............
...................
Onsite Representative: ....... Gk'.^.............. &Y.f..Ar............... ..... Integrator........................................................................................
Certified Operator: ....... 1..:J eL ,V..,. ..........................
[avocation of Farm:
.... Operator Certification Number: ?7S
.............. .... .............................. t.a.�?...... Rv.q l..............................................................................................................................................................................................
-
Latg�
itude • � �� l.,an �itude • � ��
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...........................................................................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any huller, Ihal need nlaintenancehii1p ow11cnt? ❑ Yon 1 No
2. [,11ny di,Chargc uhncrt cd f'ronl and Ire l uC the O11Cration''
a. I f discharge in ohsetwed, was the Conveyance 111,111-111adc?
h. 11'discharge is observed, did it reach SUi l.1CC WatCr'? (Il vC,,11061N DWQ)
c. IIdi,charge is observed, what is the CA mated flow ill ga]/mill?
d. Does dischargc; hypas, a htgoon system'? (]t*ycs, notO DWQ)
3. Is there evidCtice of 1).],l discharge li-onl any 111nrt of 1lie operation','
4, Were [here any adve['sC irlrlrlets to tits """tern ot,the titatc other than from a discharge?
5. DOC, iIlly 11i11't 01 tl1C XVEIntC nlanagc:nlet) I system (other than lagoon,/lullding ponds) require;
[na I n leltEl[1CL`II I1111 reri'CI11C[1t?
Yes
allo
--:j Yes
[41�0
j Yes
No
❑ Ye, [?rNo
❑ Yes Pr,�o
❑ Yes f No
Yes PrNo
Conturucd on bark

C. I, iaciM.N, not in compliance with any applicable Setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have :I ccrtiltcd opcl-ator in responsihle charge (if inspection after- I /I/97)?
❑ Yes Rf No
❑ Yes IfNo
K. Arc there lagoons or storage ponds cm Silt which need to he properly closed:'
Structures La y-oons andlor Holding Ponds
9. IS Stt'uctttt'ai it-cchoarcl IGSS tlttnl adequate?
rcuhoard (Il): Lagoon I Lagoon 2
2. C)
lagoon 3
Ye, r—�'No
❑ Yes PIINo
Lagoon 4
10. Es scclxlgc nhservcd front anti of the struetures' ❑ Yes [Z;rNo
11, Is croSion, or om' other Ihrcals to the integrity ofamv ol'the structure, observed:' �...) Yes [✓j�No
12. Do any ol'the ,IruclureS neul nulintenattcc/inglrovetncnt':' �...} Yes [✓�,Io
(If any of question's 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or cnvironmantal threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any oI'd IC Structures lack adqualc markers to idenlilV Start and ,to] IlluntllMg ICVCI,? ( Yes fi4o
Waste Application
14.
I, then physical evidence oi'ovct- applicaitioil?
❑ Yes
EjrNo
(11'itt excess ol, WMI), or 1-lmot7entcring wya�ters ol'tha Statc, notify I)WQ)
15.
ci-oll type ......... .!.r+��wl�JCfn`Qs�.......19,%O Y'3:........................
16.
Do the active crops dillcr with those designated in the Animal Waste Mam moment 111:11t'?
❑ Yes
WNo
17,
DUGS the facility halve a lack of adequate aCl'ei]gC Iol- ]and application'?
❑ Yeti
194-4l1
1 S.
Does the cover crop treed intproventent'?
❑ Yes
EO� No
19.
Is there o lack ol'availahlc irrigation cquiptncnt?
❑ Yes
fl; No
For Certified Facilities On1v
20.
Does the facility sail to have a copy oflhc Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
MNtt
21.
Does the facility Mil to comply with the Animal Wastc Mamlgemenl flan in anti' x stay'?
❑ Yes
4 No
22.
Does record keeping need impl-ot'cmew'?
❑ Yes
LVNo
23.
Does facility require a 1i011ow-1.11) visit by Salnc agency?
❑ Yes
rNo
24.
Did Rcvicwcr/Inspector tail to diScus, review/inSpcctiort with o«Vncr or operator in cltargc'?
❑ Yes
ZNo
ReviewerlhispectorName
Reviewer/laspcetor Signature: Date: 5 f 2
cc: Division ref Water Quality,, Witter Quality .Section, FacX6, Assessment Unit l 1 / 14/96

f
OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
6PR 09 '97 08:41AM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural resources
Rafeioh Regional Office
May 30 '97 13:29
OMOML FORM ea (I -OM
PAX TRANSMITTAL
TO 1 ron1
Phony
P. 02/03
' P.12
Jc7mes B. Hung, Jr.. Uovemor 754a-oi-017w7' SM-101 09HOIALSERMU A0HWtETFJAVCN
Jonathan B. Hawes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
June 24, •1994
CEATIF'IED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED I RECEIVED .
I
Glenn Boyette i APR 1997
1397 Loop Road 1
Clayton, N.C. 27520 j PUM A8S =E)1T UNIT
Subject: Notice `of 'Violation
15A NCAC 211 _02000L-. CJ'7-C16 (
Wente Not _Discharged to Surface Waters
stocking of Animals Without Certification
Johnston County
Dear Mr. soyette_ j
As the result of a citizen's complaint received by the Raleigh
Regional Office, Mr. Steve Mitchell met with you at your facility
on June 16, 1994. The information received by this Office
indicates that hogs were stocked `into this finishing facility prior
to the receipL of the required certification,,
The stocking of animals into a facility without certification from
the Soil and water Conservation Commission is in 'violation of North
Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section ,0217 (NCAC 2H
.0217).
NCAC .0217 (H) (ii) states .in part,
Plans must be certified by any technical specialist designated
pursuant to rules adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation
Commission and the certificate submitted to the DEM central
office on forma approved or supplied by DEM.
NCAC 2H .0217 (H)(v) states;
For new or expanded animal waste management systems requiting
a plan, plan approval must include an on -site inspection to
confirm that animal waste storage and treatment structures,
such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been
designed and constructed to meet the appropriate minimum
standards and specifications.
38M Barred Drive. Suite 101, Raielgh. North Caronrnn 27509 Telephone [phone]p FAX [phone]
An Equal Oppavturviy Affirmative Acf;on employer 60%recycled/ 1(M =i-consumer paper

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax=919-715-5048 May 30 '97 13:29 P.03/03
09 '97 08:41AM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX{ F'• 2i2
Page Two
eoyette Letter
NCAC 2H .0717 (H)(vii) states in part:
For -new facilities, an animal. waste management plan must be
approved before animals are initially stocked. For an
expanded agility, an animal waste management plan musr. be
approved before the sdditianal an1mals are stocked.
North Carolina General Statute.143-215.b. provides that a civil
penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) may be
assessed against any person for these viol.atlons per day for so
long as the violation(s) continues, unless otherwise stipulated.
Dui: to the above mentioned vio.1°ations, this Office requires that
you respond in writing no later than July 20, 1994, and provide any
and all information relevant to the stocking of this operation
without the required certification and reasons this Office should
not pursue enforcement activit.i.as, including civil penalties, as a
result of these offenses.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice Of 'Violation,
please contact Mr. Steve Mitchell or Mr. Tim Donnelly at 919-571-
4700.
sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P , is .
Regional Supervisor
CC. Johnston County HeCh
.Kenneth York, SCS
stockpig.nov

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualify
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director April 16, 1997
Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton NC
Dear Mr. Boyett
Farm
27520
3JECT:
ILTIMNAA
IDEHNF:Z
Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Glenn Boyette Farm
Facility Number 51--127
Johnston County
You were notified utter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than May 2, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
I�`��.
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: - Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535. N�� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

G
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Glenn Boyette Farm
Percy Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton, NC 27520
919, 553. 4094
02-01-2010
This plan has been developed by:
Jerry Raynor
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Se
2736 NC Highway 210
Smithfield, NC 27577
919. 914-7156 x3 /i
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. 1 have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
alist
/ /0
Date/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U 17
(Closure)
Lagoon is an animal waste storage structure that is no longer in operation and is being
closed as part of a closure plan. There are an estimated 4,134,000 gallons in this
structure prior to closure.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated
Broadcast
25981
Incorporated
31956
Injected
34336
Irrigated
24609
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
27,372
35,120.
-7,748
5,367,114
-1,233,114
---------------- --- -- --- --------
-- ------ -----------
--- ---- - ---
- -- -- -- - -- ---- --- ----------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined saurce,
• Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Source Page Page 1 of 1

C
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P2O5 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotaiion or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P2O5 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
P205
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(lbslacre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
11269
1
9.70
9,00
Low
NIA
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
33
NIA
11269
1 2
4.50
4,001
Low
NIA
I Wagrarn
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
33
NIA
11269
3
5.20
4,50
Low
NIA
Cecil
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
54
NIA
11269
7
11.50
10,00
Low
NIA
Cecil
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
54
NIA
11270
4
10.00
9.50
Low
NIA
Wagrarn
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
33
NIA
11270
5
5.50
5.00
Low
NIA
Cecil
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
55
NIA
12991
10
3.10
2.50
Low
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8
NIA
12991
11
12,30
12.00
Low
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4A Tons
7
NIA
12991
12
2.10
1.50
Low
NIA
Marlboro
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
6
NIA
12991
13
l 1. i
10.00
Low
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8
NIA
12991
14
44.10
42.00
Low
NIA
Marlboro
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
60
NIA
12991
15
3.90
3.50
Low
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8
NIA
12991
16
18.$
18.00
Low
NIA
Marlboro
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
6
NIA
12991
17
56.60
54.00
Low
NIA
Marlboro
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
60
NIA
12991
18
23.0
22.00
Low
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8
NIA
12991
9
8,60
8.00
Low
NIA
Marlboro
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
6
NIA
7857
1
3.80
2.80
Low
NIA
Faceville
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
7857
2
5.30
4.50
Low
NIA
Faceville
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
50
NIA
7857 •
3
22.3
20.00
Low
NIA
Wagram
Corn, Grain
74 bu.
33
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 261.40 242.80
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2010
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
` 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<=10
igh potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
[nutrient
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
0 - 25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
457089 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed 2/l/2010
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE; Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
M=ure
Applied
(Field)
tons
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
11269
1
U17
Wagram
9.70
9.00
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
92
0
0
Incur.
92
1 E90
0.00
107.12
0.00
11269
2
U17
Wagrarn
4.50
4.00
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
92
0
0
Incur.
92
11.90
0.00
47.61
0.0
11269
3
U17
Cecil
5.20
4.50
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Incur.
135
17.47
0.00
78.59
0.00
11269
7
U17
Cecil
11.50
10.00
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Incur.
135
17.47
0.00
174.65
0.0
11270
4
U17
Wagram
10.00
9.50
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/t5-6r30
92
0
0
Incor.
92
11.90
0.00
113.07
0.00
11270
5
U17
Cecil
5.50
5.00
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2115-6130
139
0
0
1 Incur.
139
17.98
0.00
89.91
0.00
12991
10
U17
Cecil
3.10
2.50
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7131
163
0
0
Broad.
163
25.94
0.00
64.84
0.00
12991
11
U17
Pacolet
12.30
12.00
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
2339
0.00
280.68
0.00
12991
12
U17
Marlboro
2.10
1.50
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
20.69
0.00
31,03
12991
13
U17
Cecil
11.10
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/I-7131
163
0
0
Broad.
163
25.94
0.00
259.36
0.00
12991
14
U17
Marlboro
44.10
42.00
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
169
0
0
Broad.
169
26.89
0.00
1,129A I
0.0
12991
15
U17
Cecil
3.90
3.50
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
0
Broad.
163
25.94
0.00
90.78
0.00
12991
16
U17
Marlboro
18.80
18.00
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
0
0
Broad.
127
20.21
0.00
363.74
0.00
12991
17
U17
Marlboro
56.60
54.00
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
169
0
0
Broad.
169.26.89
0.00
1,452.10
0.00
12991
18
U17
Cecil
23.00
22.00
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
0
Broad.
163
25.94
0.00
570.59
0.00
12991
9
U17
Marlboro
8.60
8.00
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
0
0
Broad.
127
20.21
0.00
161.66
0.00
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 WUT Page Page l of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series '
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE.
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gallA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
7857
1
U17
Faceville
3.80
2.80
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2115-6/30
128
0
0
Incor.
128
16.56
0.00
46.37
0.0
7857
2
U17
Faceville
5.30
4.50
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2115-6/30
125
0
0
Incor.
125
16.17
0.0
72.77
0.00
7857
3
U17
Wagram
22.3D
20.00
Corn, Grain
74 bu.
2115-6/30
90
0
0
Incor.
90
11.64
0.00
232.86
0.00.
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
5,367,11
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
4,134.0
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1.233.11
Total Applied, tons
0.0
Total Produced, tonsNO
OAO
Balance, tons
0.0
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
11269
1
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
100
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.00
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
owl.
VIM
RIM
AM
OW
FAMMM
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
wagram
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
75 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
92
303
11
271
6
161
7
0
P Removal
Rating
33 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
01
303
-89
27
6
l0
5
0
Tract
Field
11269
2
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
130
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.00
2115-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
wagram
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
75 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
92
303
11
27
6
16
7
0
PRemoval
I Rating
33lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
303
-119
27
6
16
7
0
Tract
Field
11269
3
Rcq'd Nutrients
135
150
30
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I
App, Period
4.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By;
'
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
122 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
135
444
16
40
9
23
10
0
P Removal I Rating
54 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
294
-14
40
9
17
$
0
Tract
Field
11269
7
Req'd Nutrients
135
150
30
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I
App. Period
10,00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
122 bu.
1 10-05-09
Manure
135
444
16
40
9
23
101
0
P Removal
Rating
54 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
294
-14
40
9
17
81
0
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/l/2010 NMR Page Page I of

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
]
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
11270
4
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
120
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App, Period
9.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
WWIMM
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Wagram
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
75 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
92
303
11
27
6
16
7
0
P Removal
Rating
33 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
303
-1091
27
6
161
7
0
Tract
Field
11270
5
Req'd Nutrients
139
150
20
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I
App. Period
5.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
Kelm
I MW
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
125 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
139
457
17
41
9
24
10
0
P Removal
Rating
55 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
307
-3
41
9
18
8
0
Tract
Field
12991
10
Req'd Nutrients
163
150
0
0
0
0
0
l
Acres I
A Period
App.
2.50
811-7/31
Supplied B
PP Y�
a�
` t' : R.
�'
a ",
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.9 Tons
10-05-09
Manure
163
615
23
60
13
34
15
0
PRemoval
I Rating
8lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
465
23
60
13
34
15
-1
Tract
Field
12991
11
Req'd Nutrients
147
150
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I
App. Period
12,00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
r
TV�;
; 3;.,
.;w�
NMI
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soii Series
Pacolet
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4A Tons
10-05-09
Manure
147
555
20
54
12
31
13
0
P Removal
Rating
7 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
405
20
54
12
31
13
-1
Tract
Field
12991
12
Req'd Nutrients
130
150
60
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.50
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
MMI,
a
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Marlboro
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.9 Tons
10-05-09
Manure
130
491
18
48
10
27
12
0
P Removal
IRating
6 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
341
42
48
10
27
12
0
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 NMR Page Page 2 of 4

�r
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
12991
13
Req'd Nutrients
163
140
100
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
10.00
811-7/31
Supplied By:
..,
$:
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.9 Tons
1 Q-05-09
Manure
163
6151
23
60
13
34
15
0
P Removal
Rating
8 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
475
-77
60
13
34
15
0
Tract Field
12991
14
Req'd Nutrients
169
0
90
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
42.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Marlboro
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
10-05-09
Manure
169
638
24
62
14
35
15
0
P Removal
Rating
60 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
01
638
-66
62
14
35
15
0
Tract
Field
12991
15
Req'd Nutrients
163
150
100
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.50
811-7131
Supplied By:.
y _
w' w
�
w.
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.9 Tons
10-05-09
Manure
163
615
23
601
13
34
15
0
P Removal Rating
8 Ibslac.
ow
BALANCE
0
465
-77
60
13
34
15
0
Tract
Field
12991
16
Req'd Nutrients
127
140
100
0
0
0
0
D
Acres I
App. Period
18,00
811-7131
Supplied B
4 M°
IAN
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Marlboro
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
10-05-09
Manure
127
480
18
46
10
26
111
0
P Removal
Rating
6 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
340
-82
46
10
26
11
0
Tract
Field
12991
17
Req'd Nutrients
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
54.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Marlboro
Residual
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
1 10-05-09
Manure
1691
6381
241
621
14
35
15
0
P Removal
IRating
60 Ibslac.
w
I ALANCE
01
6381
241
621
14
35
15
-1
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 NMR Page Page 3 of 4

C;l
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
12991
18
Req'd Nutrients
163
150
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App, Period
22.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.9 Tons
10.05-09
Manure
163
6151
23
60
131
34
15
0
P Removal
Rating
8lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
465
23
60
13
34
15
-1
Tract
Field
12991
9
Req'd Nutrients
127
150
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
8.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Marlboro
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
10-05-09
Manure
127
480
18
46
10
26
11
0
P Removal
Rating
6 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
330
18
461
10
26
ill
-1
Tract
Field
7857
1
Re4d Nutrients
128
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period
2.80
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Faceville
Residual
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
I IS bu.
10-05-09
Manure
128
421
16
38
8
22
9
0
P Removal
Rating
51 Ibs/ac,
Low
BALANCE
0
421
-14
38
8
22
9
0
Tract
Field
7857
2
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.50
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Faceville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
113 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
125
411
15
37
81
21
9
0
P Removal
I Rating
50 lbs/ac.
Low
13ALANCE
0
411
-251
37
8
21
9
0
Tract
Field
7857
3
Req'd Nutrients
90
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
20.00
2115-6/30
upplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Wagram
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
74 bu.
10-05-09
Manure
90
296
11
27
6
15
7
0
P Removal
Rating
33 Ibslac.
PW
BALANCE
1 0
296
-19
27
6
151
7
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 NMR Page Page 4 of

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
T? lmiirPfl Coil TPct VahiPc
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
11269
1
Com, Grain
6.6
0.0
22
None
17
None
11269
2
Corn, Grain
5.6
0.0
113
None
54
None
11269
3
Corn, Grain
6.0
1 0.0
18
None
13
None
11269
7
Corn, Grain
5.8
0.0
17
None
7
None
11270
4
Corn, Grain
5-6
0.0
161
None
30
None
11270
5
Cont, Grain
6-0
0.0
19
None
17
None
12991
10
Fescue Pasture
5.4
0.9
72
None
52
None
12991
11
Fescue Pasture
5.4
0.9
71
None
45
None
12991
12
Fescue Pasture
5.6
0.4
60
None
22
None
12991
13
Fescue Pasture
6.5
0.0
67
None
46
None
12991
14
Fescue Hay
6.4
0.0
66
None
46
None
12991
15
Fescue Pasture
6.5
0.0
67
None
43
None
12991
16
Fescue Pasture
6.5
0.0
66
None
65
None
12991
17
Fescue Hay
5.4
0.7
64
None
35
None
12991
18
Fescue Pasture
5.4
0.8
61
None
24
None
12991
9
Fescue Pasture
5.4
0.9
68
None
61
None
7857
1
Corn, Grain
6.9
0.0
46
None
106
None
7857
2
Corn, Grain
7.3
0.0
37
None
119
None
7857
3
Corn, Grain
7.2
0.0
37
None
$2
None
--------- ---------------------------- ----------------.
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 STV Page Page I of 1

c,
Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
.waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an' update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 Specification Page 2

�) 0t
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 211 /2010 Specification Page 3

Waste Structure Closure Plan
02-01-2010
This plan has been prepared for:
Glenn Boyette Farm
Percy Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton, NC 27520
919.553.4094
This plan has been developed by:
Jerry Raynor
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Se
2736 NC Highway 210
Smithfield, NC 2 75 77
919.934.7156 x3
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Waste Structure Closure Plan
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this closure plan.
Signature (owner)
Date
. Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature
Date
------------------------- --- -...---------------------
4M90 Database Version 3. l Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Cover Page I

C)
Waste Storage Closure Source Description
SOURCE: Lagoon
Date Measured: 09-28-2009
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 510 X 140; BOTTOM - 438 X 68; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Liquid Depth: 3.00ft.; Liquid Volume: 1,387,000 gallons. Waste Sample #: 1
Sludge Depth: 7.00ft.; Sludge Volume: 2,747,000 gallons. Waste Sample #: 2
Total Depth: 10.00 ft.; Total Volume: 4,134,000 gallons
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Applic. Method
(lbs N/1000gallons)
Source Total (lbs)
Broadcast
6.28
25981
Incorporated
7.73
31956
Injected
8.31
34336
Irrigated
5.95
24609
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.) *
Actual PAN Applied
(lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
27,372
35,120
-7,748
5,367,114
-1,233,114
* Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Desc. 1

Land Application Table: Lagoon
Source Type: Closure
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
PLAT
Rating
Crop
RYE
Crop
Applic.
Period
PAN
Req'd
(1bs/A)
Manure
PAN
Applied
Ebs/A
()
Liquid
Manure
AppliedApplic.
1000
g al/Acre
Amount
(Inches)
Applic.
Method
N
N
11269
1
U17
Wagram
9.70
9.00
Low
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
Incor.
92
92
11.90
0.44
11269
2
U17
Wagram
4.50
4.00
Low
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2115-6/30
1 Incor.
92
921
11.90
0.44
11269
3
UN
Cecil
5.20
4.50
Low
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
2/15-6/30
Incor.
135
135
17.47
0.64
11269
7
U17
Cecil
11.50
10.00
Low
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
2115-6/30
Incor.
135
135
17.47
0.64
11270
4
U17
Wagram
10.00
9.50
Low
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
Incor.
92
92
11.90
0.
11270
5
U17
Cecil
5.50
5.00
Low
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
Incor.
139
139
17.98
0.66
12991
10
U17
Cecil
3.10
2.50
Low
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
163
163
25.94
0.96
12991
11
U17
Pacolet
12.30
12.00
Low
Fescue Pasture
4A Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
147
147
23.39
0.86
12991
12
U17
Marlboro
2.10
1.50
Low
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
130
130
20.69
0.76
12991
13
U17
Cecil
11.10
10.00
Low
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
163
163
25.94
0.96
12991
14
U17
Marlboro
44.10
42.00
Low
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
169
169
26.89
0.99
12991
15
U17
Cecil
3.90
3.50
Low
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
163
163
25.94
0.96
12991
16
U17
Marlboro
18.80
18.00
Low
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7131
Broad.
127
127
20.21
0.74
12991
17
U17
Marlboro
56.60
54.00
Low
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
169
169
26.89
0.99
12991
18
U17
Cecil
23.00
22.00
Low
Fescue Pasture
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
163
163
25.94
0.96--'
12991
9
U17
Marlboro
8.60
8.00
Low
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
Broad.
127
127
20.21
0.74
7857
1
U17
Faceville
3.80
2.80
Low
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6130
Incor.
128
128
16.56
0.61
7857
2
U17
Faceville
5.30
4.50
Low
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
Incor.
125
125
16.17
0.60
7857
3
1 U17
Wagram
22.30
20.00
Low
Corn, Grain
74 bu.
2/15-6/30
Incor.
90
90
1 L64
0.43
457089 Database Version 31 Date Printed: 2/1/2010 LAT Page Page 1 of 2

Land Application Table: Lagoon
Source Type: Closure
Manure
PAN
PAN
Liquid
Req'd
Applied
Manure
Crop
(ibs/A)
lbs/A
( )
AppliedApplic.
Source
Total
Use.
PLAT
Applic.
1000
Amount
(Inches)
Applic.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
g al/Acre
Lazoon Summary:
Source Volume Available: 4,134,000 gals.
Source Volume Applied: 5,367,114 gals.
Excess Application Capacity. 29.8
NOTE_ * indicates user defined value
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/l/2010 LAT Page Page 2 of 2

Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. High levels of these metals in soils can adversely affect plant growth. The following table provides
a conservative (maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values.* Due to inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is recommended that conservative
soil target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu-I < 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Zn-1 < 300 for land where peanuts may be grown; for other cropland Zn-I < 700-1000).
Alternative application sites should be selected if the following table indicates that concentrations of these metals may approach excessive levels. For maximum copper
and zinc soil index limits, see the NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (Code 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
ID
Applic.
Inches
Waste
Cu ppm
Waste
Zn ppm
Soil Test
Cu-1
Soil Test
Zn-1
Cu-I
Adj.
Zn-I
Adj.
Estimated New
Number
Date
Soil Cu-I
Soil Zn-I
11269
1
F1
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U17
0.44
68
157
22
17
187
220
209
237 i
11269
2
F2
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U 17
0.44
68
157
113
54
187
220
300
274
11269
3
F3
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U17
0.64
68
157
18
13
272
320
290
333
11269
7
F7
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U17
1 0.64
68
157
17
7
272
320
289
327
11270
4
F4
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U17
0.44
68
157
161
30
187
220
348
250
11270
5
F5
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U 17
0.66
68
157
19
1
281
330
300
347
12991
10
F 10
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U 17
096
68
157
72
52
409
480
481
532
12991
11
Fil
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U17
0.86
68
157
71
45
366
430
437
475
12991
12
F12
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U17
0.76
68
157
60
22
324
380
384
402
12991
13
F13
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U17
0.96
68
157
67
46
409
480
476
526
12991
14
F14
10-05-09
Fescue Hay
U17
0.99
68
157
66
46
421
495
487
541
12991
15
F15
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U 17
0.96
68
157
67
43
409
480
476
523
12991
16
F16
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U17
0.74
68
157
66
65
315
370
381
435
12991
17
F17
10-05-09
Fescue Hay
U17
0.99
68
157
64
35
421
495
485
530
12991
18
F18
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U17
0.96
68
157
61
24
409
480
470
504
12991
9
F09
10-05-09
Fescue Pasture
U17
0.74
68
157
68
61
315
370
383
431
7857
1
FaF
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U17 1
0.61
68
157
46
10
260
305
306
411
--------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Metals Page Page 1 of 2

Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
ID
Applic.
Inches
Waste
Cu ppm
Waste
Zn ppm
Soil Test
Cu-1
Soil Test
Zn-I
Cu-I
Adj.
Zn-17E-stimated
Adj.-I
New
Number
Date
Soil Zn-I
7857
2
WaB
10-05-09
Corn, Grain
U17
0.60
68
157
37
119
255
300
292
419
7857
3
FaF
to-o5-09
Corn, Grain
U17
0.43
68
157
37
82
183 1
215
220
297
457089 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Metals Page Page 2 of 2

GENERAL LAGOON CLOSURE INFORMATION:
Closure Start Date: 02-08-2010 Closure End Date: 03-31-2010
This operation consists of two lagoons that have a surface area of approximately 1.7 acres and a total
volume of 4,140,000 gallons of liquid to be removed. All material has been sampled and will be land
applied according to the Nutrient Management Plan and Closure Plan developed by NRCS. The closure
will have to meet all technical standards of the Closure of Waste Impoundment Standard.
CLOSEOUT CONDITION:
All sludge and liquid are to be removed from the lagoon. An emergency spillway will be installed and
lagoons will be maintained as a fresh water pond. All disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched
according to the seeding specifications provided by NRCS. Closure will be approved by the appropriate
Technical Specialist, The NCDEHNR, Division of Water Quality must be notified 24 hours prior to the
start of the closure.
Upon removal of all liquid and sludge, the existing lagoons will revert to fresh water ponds. Provisions
will be taken to maintain the pond structure.
REMOVAL OF INFLOW DEVICES:
Remove all outlet pipes connecting the swine houses to the lagoons. Upon removal of the pipes, the
ditches must be filled in and the disturbed areas seeded and mulched according to the seeding
specifications provided by NRCS. Pipes can be left on site.
INSTALLATION OF SPILLWAY:
Lagoon(s) will be converted to fresh water pond(s) according to the NRCS Practice Standard. A
principal spillway (pipe) and emergency spillway (vegetative) will be installed on all lagoons being
converted. Installation elevation of spillways will be determined by staff.
DESCRIPTION OF BUFFERS AND SETBACKS:
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
457089 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Info Page 1

G
Ci
This site requires a 25 ft. buffer be maintained around all field edges which are not property lines, 50 ft
buffer on property lines, 200 ft buffer from all dwellings, 100 ft buffer from a well and 25 ft buffer
from surface waters and drainage ways.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
Seeding Specifications
Application Field Maps
Waste analysis report
Nutrient Management Plan
Spillway Requirements
OTHER:
Recordkeeping: Record all applications of lagoon liquid and sludge. Record date, location, total
amount, start and stop time and means off all application of waste. Forms have been provided.
--------------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
457089 Date Printed: 02-01-2010 Info Page 2

_ij
z
s - CD
'� �
�3 �{ +'rt
Lipk;oolv
f"
-
;rantha�'

ohnston County FSA
arm 21620 Tract 12991
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Reshtcted Use
' 7 Limited Restrictions
Conservation Com
Disclaimer. Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape,
or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original
determination(CPA-026andattachedmaps)forexaciwetiand Crop
boundaries and determinations, or contact NRCS,
I
-MIM
MMM-
MAMMON
ON
M.-
=MEE
m
ON
Total Cropland_ Acres
4RIM A

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Glenn Boyette Farm
Glenn Boyette
1387 Loop Road
Clayton, NC 27520
919-553-4094
12-24-2002 � "I", .
Z"
This plan has been developeo-
61-
Mark A. Ferguson
NRCS
806 North Street
Smithfie , NC27577
9 7 4347156
X-';
JI g A
loper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have mad and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
2-;? C)h
Signature (owner) to t
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water #onservation Conitpission.
Plan Approved By:
-1-1 / / 3,) 163
De
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,298,960 gals/year by
a 2,480 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5295
Incorporated
9094
Injected
10014
Irrigated
5755
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
6,158.05
2,459,777
-160,817
Note: In source ID, S means standard source. U means user defined source.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for
each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
11270
1
N/A
Wagram
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
11270
2
N/A
ICecil
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
7857
2
N/A
Waw=
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
7857
3
N/A
Faceville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
9127
1
NIA
Wapram
Sma11 Grain Overseed
l.0 Tons
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
G 2
nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management(590) should be planned.
< = to
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the
soluble nutrient leaching below the
soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> to
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391 }.
180595 Database Version 2.0 1 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 PCS Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres
of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and
the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is
being utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests
should be used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that
the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
Ral/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
11270
1
S7
Wagram
11.00
9.35
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
so
19.97
0
186.74
0.00
11270
1
S7
Wagram
11.00
9.35
Hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
269
0
0
brig.
269
107.45
0
1,004.65
0.00
11270
2
S7
Cccil
10.10
8.60
Small Grain Overscod
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrie.
50
19.97
0
171.76
0.00
11270
2
S7
Cecil
10A01
8.60
Com, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
1391
0
0
brig.
1391
55.52
0
477.49
0.04
-7857
2
S7
Wagram
20.00
17.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
urig.
50
19.97
0
. 339.53
0.00
--7857
3
S7
Faceville
4.90
4.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0
83.88
0.00
9127
1
S7
Wagram
1 L50
9.80
Small Grain Overseed
t A Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irria.
50
19.97
01
195.73
0.00
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/24/2002 WUT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Vesir 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Avolic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen,
Nutrient
Applied
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
I WA
I tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,459.78
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,298.96
Balance, 1000 gallons
-160.82
F '=
Total Applied, tons
_V.
0,00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
€` :.
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/24/2002 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. ffapplying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inchesthour)
Application Amount
(inches)
11270
1
Wagmm
0.60
0.72
11270
2
Cecil
0.40
1.00
7857
2
Wagram
0.60
0.72
7857
3
Faceville
0.40
0.96
9127
1 1
Wag=
0.601
0.72
180595 Database Vernon 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 IAF Page I of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields
with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface
water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels
may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
31.09
62.18
93.27
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
15.55
31.09
46.64
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
29.15
58.29
87.44
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 Sludge Page i of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The,
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Stora a Ca aci (Days)
Start Date 10/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
159
1
2
162
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
165
l
8
166
1
9
152
1
10
152
1
11
145
1
12
137
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 Capacity page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/24/2002 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/24/2002 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste -shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/24/2002 Specification Page 3

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/24/2002 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
Corn Piedmont
The following crop note applies to fteld(s): 2
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations
should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till.
Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When
planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted
practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and the remaining
N behind the planter. The total amount of is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of
the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. l to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced i' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply I80 to 240 Ib/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 Crop Note Page I of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book")and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at. this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
180595 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-24-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

:rt•
•. Sj�+A r� � �i �, �`� f` c;,Ly � �� k _i�i� 'lrS��" s '�, �'+ ,�'1�^� n. �rl t :. is
i � � � � \ , '! 7 :� � 4 r i � � 3 -;, , �. 1+ '�°r* �`a ;r'K,t• i r 7 .1 1•,..
-,.4 A !
t
� Jk tsT rY ,� y a � � s �, { fi+t+ •;h 'S ro + r rJ';
S' •AAa\ ,i w• -'4t' M M7�t �l 41� pa'Y �} lC rr S 1 C..R
-
�
fir( �" - ti ;r '�,'-eTr ,. � - �` � � ��15`� � ;:9�57 �� � � '' � �•'1ti�� � 1�
A _ °" t � 7 �! 1 ;f � s '' 1�(.£w4,rq�.i•' r i�;,k.1iP�t� ��IFrc'txy'
tN-1',
41
- ` �, a%� r { r t \ S �,� , a <: }� - Yam, y 7 •' f � � -�, '
s �
l 1 � P � } S r • }f l
\ c
Xl.. t �A r• r Y I, a s 1 �, + r wr "'811 is ' f aE tip 1 - C4 p r
1 'K'Y TSs 'Y
fh �: ,�iP.{, t
S,Nw
\ y
� i .; r ifs, - ,• �,r .- \ �� t +, _\S �' ++yr'�1.,¢
; ;dkFN. i}ini•.'S'M7':.ri..n:.{�t�f''� _i ah1

U
;ZW
go
Lk
T4"
li MR-

-135 -7
EXHIBIT B
Waste Utilization Agreement
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, v Q hereby give permission to apply waste from his
Waste VS&tion System on ,;U.-2o acres of my land for the durat n of the time shown below, The field(s) on
which waste can be applied are shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and trace elements, and when properly
applied should not harm my land or. crops. I also understand that the use of animal manure will reduce my need for
commercial fertilizer.
IP
Landowner: Date: - �J
Term of Agreement r to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -shared Items)
r
Notary
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources -
Division of Water Quality OR Z- FY 2000
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form ;
(THIS FORW MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)'
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations _
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Glenn Boyette Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Glenn Bo ette
1.3 Mailing address: 1387 Loop Rd
City, State: Clayton NC Zip: 27520
'telephone Number (include area code): 533-4094
1.4 County where facility is located. Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 1708 north out of Clayton past the Neuse River
and take first right and go to 1387 Loop Road _
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's 1 Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 51 (county number); 127 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descriiptio Swine operation
^Feeder to Finish
2560- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? =yes; nono. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num eb r for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
a J6 0_
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 51- 127
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 23.6
2.4 Number o agoon storage ponds (circle which is applicable):_
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields?
YES or NO please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)?
YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting
Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
,3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
r3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
-3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
33.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.I5 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 51- 127

Facility Number: 51 - 127
Facility Name: Glenn Boyette Farm
isted in question 1.2), attest that
this application for ,J4� _ lrr�,�,�t (Facility name listed in question I
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and comple a to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package willAbe,returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
I 4- 4
S. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM- AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51- I27

m
i } 1 tll at 4I
1 [ al 1`` U II
S; 11 !) JI N 11 al r�
j` [1 if Qf II s .'
+ '•� al [lt +11 VI {�r,41 at 41 .11
u u al 1�I rtl p! 1 11 ;
.r1 ll N •[1
�1! '•1 1 If
} 'II ,{ al t tot 1) •t1
+, U 'tl of n! at 1 ll N 1 I f
of al 1£ 11, to a al [1 tl
� j I 1{ al U .r1 of tl? •.1
Il,.t1 n n! 1
1�.' 1 ,n t+l r1 U'f1.11 11 tS 1 on [l tl
' �'� •± U ' ••I
I I to w al 4 t I III Ill
r'� r1 I tf tr+ t[1 1 of r .0 U ,l 41 ..I
1 r 1i nl nF ••1 U U t-1
r,1 rl 'l l VI •• .[] 1) sn A ff
(� t141a1t1t1[t1t 1n?•r1i[:
I cl
U q N•IF tr+'111+it I111 rl'it of
i 11 to 11 I1 �
al a1 0 w al N to 11
.-1 11 { 1 . I VI U .il 11 ;t t _ of + In
.-.-� n• :I n I1 11 at .r S i
j11I 4 tt'II tq 11 101 � 1 f1 at al 1 1U trf
U to 1 !'f nl I' 11 to 11'
11 •11 Ll 11 41 Uf nt rI $
ll' `+11: `.� �J ii,•tf, tl1 Utr 111 v !1 t rt V
al t! i� nl 41 i{ .il 11 11 n1 { ,
0 to [1 If of al 31 11 1VI 11 9
rti #� r1r .In[nut 111 1 N
f "-1 t 1 rll t; nl 11 trt+Is
I— I 1 't1 nl 11 t1 of Rl 14 a
1 1 Q 11 -,1.( 0) f l t I I 1 I 1 11 ti I t
1 1 r I t , 113 n of w al Nto
P,
�'� - I r 1 'T•s� '• t/t PI N �� '[1 1'� nl r I al
al 1 Y !li w
11 t i= tel y 1 u 01
+� 1 `1'`I 1► ii In N [] .� N tit tR rl
afu v1 U r� al rl at
Vi I I ti t. •t 11 nl { 1 1 ! 11 In -I u
tl, t1 ct nl r1 tt a1 •11 (1 11
�^"�: �C n '• I 11 r 1 QI 11 rl ;t rl 0
#1 II n 11 ti. I II 3 4I +It
1t N rl I ni a{ •r I I+I I I t!! al
�) 11 11 •• •11 11 :t al 0 n} .11 01
at of 11 I f 1 '1 f 1-1 11 al .-I
j M N t l t 1, nl N v1 U q Ir 1). t
1—�,,. 1+. I I t l u ,r al at �1 at +11 •�
'tl at 41
a 1� to of;j v;,1S'
I1.1•11U I1{I.1N
U t- [1 •• m 11,+11
n1 •0 11 t 11,+I1 9t
3 41 C] w to N
a
�
1
a
J
SQ
.
w
at
'I I
II
Vo
1
N
N
IN
ll
N
N
[
IN
t:]
V
�
O
U'
U+
t<t
11
VI
j f
I
0
in
;m

11
VI
N t1 +I R
U
U
nl
f; ti
N U to Jr t1 U
a) it al
f
• I l t+
•
11
of •, r 1
of vl
i
() I-; 11 ! V) of tl
it of n1 ll
l n1 I
t f it
j
nl
+1 of r!
Qt
II 0 {F r a} 0 )
r P
U at t) 11 t1
1
1 r tl al '[l
N r; if C
a)
tr N
N
+41 •. a) nl {! 1 r 1
r) nl td
:• ar t t
,1 rtl at r 1 f pf
irl r t;
In of t,
41'l
t1 11 [[j U
[; ra 14
a1
[ .11 11 U
If at. 1 at It
•1 •.1!
N nl U
al nt •.�
if a1
.il
0) It a!
t) If
S1 nl . I tr' t1 U' U i7
1I It •,� .,I
rl
nl ft nl
in;1
I
'� [f •I rl N {t rIl
4 U Lr rtl ;> W rl tit
.tI
r
JI
VI U V
(lr
r•+
�t
a) n1 N N 1
t►+r-I U • a) al
rt
•1 q I
;t .-1 tR
t) at .0 (1
(1 -t 1 1
n;
at ` T (� • 1 t, • . I
:L
i t a)
Till VI (1)1
s r
cl ll
tl N to ,f
ar r-I .c; of
N 14
u
u .t;
of tnr 1 t 1
�1 01 •I al rI • 1 U+
of of 'U N 11 t)r !{ a)
••I .r1 t) tit
,-1 ••!
.,[1
14 to 11
'tl tl
If I' t l
.r)
It at al nI of to p, •. (I
I N .ra
r I) al
i4
-
al
nit
N •� n
N R 1 11� f
:t
no { a) a) if (7
{ tl 11 al ;•, t4 N 'LI a)
tt
.sl
n1 U I1
n I,
[11"A • I
tJl g
It tl a1
Fit n1
tl al 11
N U+'t) I), of al tit
th•Lf 41 a) U to, 1) 11 11
to (),= N
N F
�
••I 'I N N
[1, Lr'r1
11 3
N m nl+
N I1. 1" n
{ 4 j r 1 N .� n1 N of
rI 11 n�
I �• 1 U
'1
.11
'LI (lr 1)
jl
• t
nl ��
S) •� .y4
N
T1, :� • A A #I of •tl N in
n1 1) it J 0) to I r;
VI [
to n!
11 •r Lit
m nt N 1)
!1
tl
r'
at •r I (�
to Ft t j't1
I 1
'tf
nl I1 al
to ;) rl
ll 'L) alr
11 V T .k
If to N
:' S' al
I_t i) V V •.1 a) 11
t; a1 V) • I
L)
ii
V1 Id
tr
'11 i•
a) Ill at
t4 rl
r l
f 'L1 Ol
:t
-to N
11 li U
01 a)
m • I ,'L1 () (i () U 'll -
',�
11
It U U Li
a j °, `.[1
tro
f-•-,
LI�
,
t) 1 I
nl nl
.r, rd h+ of
nl VI 01 14 rd U a)
t) I •U p, J U+
0 t nt
•1 al
in �1 ,V,, 'll
a) rd . t
+ 1 F
1, n1 .ct
U r; {1 1
U t: •i •r{ al t, U rI
V (t J
t1 .ir N i11
U�
t1 •t
•I Ir
co V) II 11r.C..
at (7 J) .1 at at Vt n!
O J} U
It t).
i' r 4 U
f�
li if t
rtj ,1
tf n) to it
r i {1 1rt if
;' ai wr t!, •f 1t V al
t i+ ;1 VI .-1
�,.rl
11 - al
a) It
V) rt� II it
It.t7 •I al a)
It 1,N Tl, a) i N N •rl 1{{
a) •I tl of
r1 a) of •I
Rl 1, ti r-
t; a) fl 1,
n) it ; V1
11. 1: n1 •I
:i Is
1,.-t - N - (11 it )
I• n) al •I tl
•� r1 13.1
t! �) .,I
al t [1
t1 �1' • I
VI N to 0 -.1
11 n! •1
u
1' •' al r l •. 1
il'H��
a) . I .Y
[i U 11
trt al 't
rl 01 QI J N
I>r 17 N LI 01 n 4t ()
n' II r-4 N N
I I N ()
1) a Rl L)
VI U at (1)
ci =u;i r�
N
1 f
N N .r1 al 1� [� .ra lr t1
at m to a 4 a t u) to at
'tt of i'4 {t
1-1 t
.11 11 .tj
i�
a .1 I ), m
it
.t v) .11 U
rl
rl
+-1
1::�

n1 ii ti
at
j
i4
al
, 4 --
l
(I
Id I�II•I F
, I�
II•
11
~ •
I
rf I s a!
11 PI It vl r�.r;
VI l 1 rl • I 11
I al f� Q1
n i•rl st.t1 FFI Intl at Id
I I t 1 1 1 I
'+ I
tl-,1 at II
a}
tl
to
a1 �tl
tl n al at •r1+
it 11•11 I1 •
tI1
I 'U
,t
(l+ 1 al 1i�11 tl
11 I,1 t{ tl SI 17
r
•• I if
,! 1 Id [t 11 it if
61 t) It if
' 1
11. I,) 11 1 Il I'1
4!
l,
1
1
;+,
nT .. l •, { nl -11 r+
t 1
U} of I r +11 :1 UI
6) I I I
1^.'l1 r-= vl U t tl
a! U! to rt 1
t)
11 •- I S't V1 11
,}
'r •,
r I
j 1 rl 1 a1
11 I I ,- I t, t•' I' l t
at .r rl
I [1�II,11 1� ;,t1
,t ,I •, 1
U 111 11 to 1 ,1 41 U't
td1 t.r, , 1
t t[1 { 11 vl
t 1 a1
? 1 II nl
I I Il
w
al
to it 1, at { r rt1
,
.11 11..1; of {I 11
,I rI•
t
ll •t 1 r; `1 t► 1 t , I
al 11-,I Ir tI I I
nl It•N ri
'cT
a! tl
a) 11 11••-It) I[ -•,r 11 }t I� +�
a V I' t1 t1
},:
yl V1 (1 11+14 nl'tl
tl }1.
••,ti 11 (t.l,.,� I,1
111,
II no ,t i! •t �•+
1
." •t' rd n �,t �-,III-1 it al at -I
1 T. t
11 •tl •, ,r; It
,d
to l). UI :1 I tit
1�
;1 ;• It 11 It 1+
- r1 11 r rr t
.11 tl , tI t} ,11
ET Q1 • 1 1 1 I
t1 tq 1) 11
V] I1. N t'I •• 1
U 131
UI 1! I t vl t r .+ I I I
1't nl 1 j tl I I at �.
11 II
r 1
;( 'tl
' t� •I
v 1
tit(-1,-1
r r r, l
1 U td I+ . 1
s,1 v1
I)
,
4r ,+
U)
R! n} to It,►)
nl . (. I 'I1 Q!
il*{i tl U�1 1
•r� I` 11_rl
,t1 al U' I I (1 h I1, I I •, al tr1
11.f1 - v1.A
rt
t1
11 al 11 r al
n1
I) t1
UI tl II 11 r1 1r
nl I'1'tt N U h1
t
it
�1 a1r
Il al r!•
,r] 1].
11
QI j r 1 r-1 11 I I
;. •r r� t 1 ()
vt I
I I I I • r} m ... I
f,
IJ :J .Ij�C? (1
•
t[ is t1 "U to Ll II td,- l
t} } 1 Id I1 ,' I '11 ,t ,l I
I tl ( I V 1
•il 111 I� td
I'1
It t1, 1'r
IJ 11
;t
to41
tl 11
to N I I oil r l 11 1
`
1
Ul In
, 1 to
II ri. h ql at U 14 +,
1
-, I 'if
t} al 1 1
[;
I f
1 ! UI t I t1 1 tt I.l
11
tf v rt 1
-
nl V, t! v1 rl 1
i
lI U [1 al n1+1 t1
1, t + ,
! q f! a} Ir a1 II t+
II i1 tT a1,-1 V}+11 rl•+1
91,1. ; - U
r t�1 U I I 11
tj� at Ill ; 11 t1 „1
a} . I
t; •I
11 nl I' 111 t I
t1 II St a} II n1 li
nt 1I ,I-fI'! W Ol
ttr;
tl t (! Tlr-l+-l.11 to alIll #t
aI I,1111
11 tl a1
tt
ll,f) 1•.'I•,I 11 I!
(I
11 (I
1'1 tl,n ,1 tl al
,11 n! 41�).tl
lly� I 's t1.11 N U
tl
p• II QT 4t
tj
r+I
el II ci nl 11
I is tJ'tl Id
t1
111 Irt
tl }I It rl 4
.'}, rl
a1 IS n1 VI U to,
tl.t�!
,� }1 tl Cl w t11 t) 1i �1 !I I1 tq
I t t al -
[t tl tf [ 1+1
11 t t l 0� 1 r
t
, I
r Ct Q) nl h) I I 1 t.
1 ff
nl If
. I r,. 1 r I• I t l 1
,
I
to ;• N it nT nl
vl t
tl 01 , t! to vl t! 1!'tl •rI nI 11
It t al +1 tl
to I bl1
I!
_,I nl r],1r
N QI 11 I rr:
It I1
tt• 11'LT II 1 t
j ill
r! [1 [).t7 1 no n�
to a it n�-.I
.1 .f� rl t U I t If tT
tr I ;I vl.11 nl ;i td i1 II
•t1 I rt at
a1 tl
It
1 :1 at A r 4 trl
'� tl ;e r
tt t t
a►Ord
,1
I3.tl no n1 ;1
tJ it
V il.
y;
nl t!'-•1 [1 II
•,1 al It it t1 tJ {1 11 t 11
.I r4 1 of ii
t1
II •I tr +I tI
nl nl 1' .r! U-I • !
"({. i
nl °1 11 U - tl (1 t1 al , ,I IJ
I,
r U U rt1 al to lit I1 r I I
r 111 I
I
p. to 11
a1
•, R to .r I i ; ..
I
al t t. IJ I1 nl
1 I •, ,t vl nl rl
r1 # 1 t1 t I
Ill I I I1 ,_ 11
I
I l at 'it I I vt al I ' I1• tl 1 I
,
�� �'
t
Lr1 t t Vl r !+I '1
n , 111. ;t r
, 1 rJ 1 I 4 I
11 1• '1 Iq al tI
tl ; of to al •r al aI 1^'
�d
t 11 U -+I
11••�U
al .f, 11
I , Ir
tt 1) a1 tI tip of
to 11
n#'tJ It it, al
vl • t ;
it ;1 t) ;e It.r ,1;.r1 ally �I li
Vl Al r I ,i W, 1 I1 I1 N 1 '
I I j
al a li+-I i�
II
id
31 •'I 1�•al f N ii
1
rI r1
11 Irl tl.r} r1.rl tt
Qt t
F i nl N nl . l t. vt
.f
+
1 n iJ 1 1 td 1 a! tit
i 1
,o U al Ut
, I Ql
N
Ir, tl t�I.rl v1 it
-
t1 t1 •
vl al t; vt rl vI
1
• 1 11' :t t1' , I I at
i1 ! r N it U !t 4 1 tt 1 Ul # 1 tl l
* I t+ tt o { I
[]
Id 1
t Vl •-•I 1
al r1 lJI
, I ,t] , c al 'u I I
,J
I t at ;• 11 ;l
nl 41 nl'It. 1 •# 1;
I],Il II I
tl CT (0 V
I j'r-I
rt'
tl,- it. ��
11 1
EI I 1 r 1!
Li tI l4
,I II
11 to no
a!r ` to
-1
I~ It1
rl
r!'+I [1 U. 111 I• •1
01 Ir (],N Q! Iq r;
t1 al •� to I1 ,1 N ;� U t1
}} 41 (t
t1 QI i1 a1 In
h.nit
n
I Ir cV
I� �t +u,
,)
tt, R ltI
It't1
I1, ,I rtl
vI .I s) I I I I
1
r1.rr �1' al U !! U , al tt
(t.r
In tj -
t
o 4f
. I V1'°�r•I
al p. tl
vl "I 11,-{ 11 9f (r;
,
Up 41 gli,l 11
al 'l . IIr U
+1111 go r1.rt (1 ;7 ; ar.1
f 1 1
'+t
tl.[1 td II t1
'n, • vt (=1
11 IL, I
rd
Sd ,t I, tf t1 .11
;t 1.1 vl I
tl
It I tlt tI
I
11 (! vt I+.t7 I'I , I1 ,f 1 11
t) 1t tJ , i I
1 ,t ,t a! 1 I r l! al
at a1 t+r al
R 1 01 - vl •, I
at
t1! F-(r 11.11 t1
.n
aT
, trI . I
11,-I II 11
VI - 1 n' 'LI 11 U
nr 'I l tJ 1 I to •, 111 ({
r
vl I! t vl 17 11
11
vl
tri t •1 I al 1 , 11
I[ U r 1 j 1 11 t Id
I1 ao rq
1 I
r ; , R I I.
)L
IlT I1 I II al tl nl
9t 11 Il lr al tI II'
tl -I1 rt 1-I td t1 IJ tU •fl t?
11 I t1
.r
t r
r S 1 No I I r
,t
(I at v1 . I ;j rI t
I l I
,•! a! L'+I rl
at r 141 [! I 1 �'
, vl
tt ; .
+ t h tt I # ,1
al Id , F 11 I;
I
,It
+
a) � - to , t tl I I
F I I II } al I't
M W t1
it It 1
, i'n 11 I + . 1
+ r
S , l :• ! :1 U '• 1 n1
.111 Iq I f U 't a1 rll ( at al +- I
I tdl I 1 Ii1
+ ;
a1 at t l 11
II
I
U�
nl l -' t vl vt [,
1
ri It .14 N r 111
Its al vl al al tT ,c1 U I1 b(I u
iF 01 11 13. T*.'[I ` al I]. t+)
n tt - , I+ I {r
'!
1
br1 ai I a1 N
to 11 ;t
U nt vl I,1 tl 1 +
i r 11 vl ;` tr1
1 It Vj r1 •�
1 F
at *-I if V1 I1 p, t ( tl vl'[i r
rIl tl LJ I>1 II tl t r� Q1 1..[ I
F I1 a1'd at
•t Il ], F; 6ll,f
1 I t1 t1
(
.,
1) N 11 vt U
( 1/t O) r� Q) LI''l1
Is n}
t1 11 OI
a1 l) r I (1 al I1 al
r ..11 !) . It, IryUI t_1 '
4 I r11 rd t iar V > I ;
j .[ r- II
, I
,1 1 V 11 V
t
t�. 1 t al ;
',1 in ot11 (-1
[1 tI [ r
Ci r 1 ,
,�
11 ,d
[� IV 1
1# 4.4 1l V 1 111 11
i
* '
t4
An

� �� � T.rrr � � � �
_._.._.... �_�,�. a... : w �.... ...
:..
_ ____ _..
_ + ram. �� -�.... �' ' ��
.. .. ..- ..�...... ..... .... .... ... � �rraL.
see a_:3c�ed =a= s,.c;r;; =S �- :e :_e T ^?stc :.e _-Ze-d �c, y..;; •c__'_
c; Waste �:—T c_
^'.•tee C= A=7
f 1
.: =a:_::s NCT x--r sits= NC-_ & o Apr,-: az .: =%=_4
Rya MR 2Rs -' =3 OR
==C- --•J _Ls des�;':.'e`= =cam /ge GaTs c=
r..e �:.�. "_ C...r 5 ter_ C ...L'S r ..C: =amcved cm ta-; @ z . C : C..... _ V$y '
as _:.s t. -ce sact;_c a Vc_,-.:.e =e—c
9 :z BG ZrCt=
time �cc3+ Naz•- Resct.=s Se —ems
Sc,i Ccsse=racica ses ram, e) os Scl a :c Wa ez C :zs e_--ra :zcc
of.f_cs af _er 7cc zecei.ve the waste a: aly's:�s =ecc -
`-e a=iz :t ?er ac_e z a==! �T a'."-c `- a -=c�a=
? 4-- - -
c_y ,ca _ate _ cs tc a==I_r_= -tee ::ast_.
Na--'�3y_?e c� Oce�y- ter_ 1'Q�/G-�Tiw✓ p.✓ 7-#"S iIr I-7
� IG k�G /f•PI�Tpw/ S I/STFr"1 4 •✓ vim' ALE G.POPS . S�,pi,✓s- ,¢.•-.o
�/ M �¢ S� a,✓ hC T/.s►F /fC-' /r �✓.¢s a 4.v ye
FX �f r-/•�•� F �PaA=4S i°�P�viv� h�r3E !� HF�'Ea'S. /•✓�� �"��4-T��/ •��^�P
/S �cR�✓ G F L.aiM soME /�i 9 3 D.¢ry9 I°Pbvi,oa�D d �,P • �E z d ct"a
•✓D g. T �✓ G ST i` HwiitiE�'d� [_Sa ✓[� ,ems r1v s
�A/ �? r.✓ AWOW TNC FE�PTI�JxE�' N E ,SE4774­1 OG Tf>sE / 97 ,Vo-fr* e.4Ws4

4 f ..........
wr_ti: ad; acaa= ;.ssdownar =r= �o at_scted)
(,Zaq-sdsad c:1p l cpa .as daQs =c= cw--
adoquize !and jsa. Raq--srod
=3c ; _ _sue= Sc •? G= — L13 s . Y
_ r_ e = �� Ac - V im,--��=
I I I I I I 1
I I f I I 1 I
I I I I I I i
I I I I i i
V Se$=act:.c_e fcr =--Lb_e Z.
_ct_'_s a.!:ove =m*_ss
T a: i e ?
L.L.
ar 1 e 2
_
I:otz.l
!
y
1".e
Was-- ff!:J?'_a_"C= ? _.
--_-�
e�doddc
ra�� ac ?�c3�ic�
oc S7=dCe at
ac-csc rates..-=e
%I� •-
�eas�: es
ta crsve== cve_
cz
e? e✓e=ts .

...... ZL'`Q,N
C`' ;;asc2 ?_ad;:Cs_ ?a= _earya=lays taco etc.)
1110 -�? s : /• q (zc.) ;a�sc�/a..:�-.sue/-Tee- _ �{7�,� m•✓s (�^ )
was �e/,jeer-.
pole N;i=nCe= (?Q) ?==d= a ?ate 7gla
ay{So a==—_s A 3 L1s . = A:3/ W-0ye_- = J1101 s.s . 1 sti/ fe=-.
C (7;Lzl _= !I- C- =e�=. Gu=;e st . fig,) -
t�:e a •.Cve a=ct;w Ca :rase is a b i - jCb . jCt: shou c ^ j a+_
ti.=e a :d have a=-- -a a ui;=en s to ajj i y oe -_ �.
-- - - - ._- as_ a e_r
Me. f=WCw-1- ac-s_ce will he aee_ed Mr waste ap_ ; -_atic = based C
We Cr-_ to he c_c«-= arc sw--face apy l' cat" CM:
T=ac= _ ield SG_l C--z; ..;S . i� Aa=eS S . N H6==. z Cy
so. _y;e = e= AC . x Ut_'_-ced A;_-;az_---
/ yo
1
/ o
9.
I y I w_�I�
_Icy_ _ 1�r+w_�s_ I
- �y
I- I
!�T-Y,.-_e• -_ SwF_
I I
i I
, _ _.Si,�Y _,
I I
I
d{
9.3
i i
I I
I I
t
/f ! 6.14E*
' 0°E71AXf 1
/po
I 1 G(,O
1 ,,tic -.Ty
I I u-
i ; bE36 I
p
! !
I err l a c
I I
I I
I I
I
t jw &f*
I =,"4rg
j
k
I
aC�ru KYS wi, I
S==a. as C- a="3 r `s�=111 sr are applied, t-,: ey =_S= he
.y -.a rr - � - �r
aC=z----=ed f-- . ;T ---s= ie lased Cr. rea?_s is r_e rd eY_er+ay_cr.
NC.;..., M:e aaC3_C__;.= is caw-'c :ed Sat Y a: a x .:3r be over applied
IN-Ce__",. tan N rmq=!_m=es_S. ?.eqWi= V teat toe Czas,a-
zC := y3s3Ce.m.=s Aw will requize aS=Cw s On SC=C eaS e s C==== ' s
of C. W1 0a tZ S37e a ---.-le== =z=zTf=eW ! !a= --3= addresses
all __ a==s. =Wz :1as C=_F add=ssses Al=rCTM.

11 t! t' '11 'tl 11 v1
(11 of tl! [i All of (11 •1 r r al o
11 tl .IJ 1J 1' 1 aI In II 1j .11 1. It .3 '11 u u u t; ' 1
L! 11 N .11 of III nl al It t a) !; f' �'' U nl rl
r-_....� �d :I -•I n) of v1 {1 U tO .r 11 , 11 `f�! +It .• "tl t1 1r W I to +11 11 O I I a) fitC) I 't vl 'tl tl1
>n III
11 O iJ l l
1'Unl.lnf�]�r! U:.IIl:tl - Itli II - NrlII Naltl.IVol
t; •• .Its
11: ,t Il. a .1 U VI 1t+111 I I Id • 1 1.
�1� nl 1 ul •i '[i V1 .-I tll • l (1. ;•, tt .-! al nl nT 1II al (1 (1 11 It of no
I;
a) _I 11 N •f nl St .-1 Ir nl • I II 11 nl .f) 11 A to I1 01 It al rl nr 11 } nr I
11 r) •I In .[1 of ,-! 11 Ir [I. O •) 11 U+ VI N :t 1 11 U .11 U+ It V! 1f If !('11 11 •, 1
I nl tP It 11 {1 at !1 �! r; I1 (h 11• 11 rl N ; , ;1 of (I 1! ,
I1 "I ll I1 ;1 As 1► w !, , ut EI UI U (} t[ U
It a1 11 v1 a) N I`i [, if 11 ,t I( rn , I I� II of 1d al •• I 'I: 11"11 I1) �,
N (' nl .1 nl N rd ll U n} ') n {1 1 ,t . r a1 t
tl•uutofof •I ;trlr�-r;If - 1 I
rl,�, +1 .r' 1 0) •,1 I+ a1 11 nl II
no ' 1 al O r1 u of U nl lt+ V1 11, III It l! •11 al St I1
F 11 al J1 tq nl Vl Ut U f I)It fl 1+ r: 1 f1, 1 rl t! '- 'll nI
1 I t U+, , I1'I( at •I .r! 11 ul ; , U) -to v!
+ V •I r 'll of [ O nl Ij n ,I 11 11 (1 I I1, N r1 •1 I; t1 11 11 1 'tl N .11 11 .t N U , 1 :• u u to, to, [1 •111 •1 f� 3; 11 t1 :I 11 :t •• I Ul 1 el aI
rl (1 ;r .-I N :', •I tl r.l ul f' [! 11 t1 ll 1 lot tl 111 . + +•
no n1 't l 'I t trt N 11 tar al • 1 11 :1 IU 1 tit 11 I . , I I } n1
•-I t1, I ' t i<tr1 11•-I•t1 r, (1 r I •I. I r F;.11
• I I t! ll• I ti 11, tl 'l nl rf rl 11 •11 11 U a! • I 't) s+l to nl I
�� 1\ it [' at 1! n1 S! of ;-, [1 .-1 t1 11 11 It II •1 11 Ih •I 1 U ! nl 11 • 1 U a1 '11 11 Of E t 1 I I , j '1 r nt al n1 1 I Ill u '[! a) a) I at 1) I 1 Of
[( 11 ! .11 11 [, r 1j It 1! #1 n1 .0 r' 11 1). 1a 11 'tt 11 11 11, of of I� ;t rd .1 11 U) '• of 1 it 01 1" V) •-I r--1 M 11. •I 11 Id 11 fl,rl" I) n +II 01
V 11 N +I' .. ! I �! of .11 -•I of N •1 1(r 1 Ul 1� :1 +!1 41 rd 11 :I r) 11 ') 1) to
VI nl tJ tl I, rt ,t Et I1 r; ,c Ij m .-t rl 1t 11 (l U 1 1 •LI al UI 6 tl it 11
��� •1'It 11 nl a) I at l) a 't1 11 VI V1 11 (1 nl 11 •1 ll'LI 11 1 tt 111 I+ a) N to it ••I !1 •-1 II 11 .-I at of al m N 11 ••1 -It =1 1 Is 1) I; 111 I1. 1I • 1 [f [' I ' [1 a} a) +1[ O 11 11 `1, ;t
t1 [l, !�, n) • 1 .t LI [1 ;t 'C1 11 ••I ;-, •tl 11 II 1 -
2 Ir (t al tt, h+ 1• • I Il el . L1 tl1 W N [) nI.1 11 of. (1•,It rt o) al rl 1(• 1
l_. I u .-I N •� 1 S1. nl II al a1 11..-1 .r, v) . I to 1d t; I1 rj t; • 1 r1 .r; { rt I I
1 h I •1 • 4 !r N I] [l,.tl •� 11r [f 'if 11 •-1 •.I vt :t a) III • 1 11 nl •I •1 t, 11 V N N U •! [. 1`` • 1 rl 1! •n!'t) � r1 tl 1� N (1, U1 rl pj �, U rt ` •I :1 ( r-1 a) I1 (1 • -I 11 •r) W 1 (1 tti (h.1; 11 11 r
c to • 1 1 .[1 I al U 1 11 n1 .r r 1. 1 t n1 VI 'III Ill
t •[ r1 1t r. Ul N It •I -) • I fit 11 Ut r1 rA 11 [1. 1)+ n 1I 41 0 I1 I! •.1 I rf .-r [ 11 F 1[ Id 11 •1 .(r t! I 11 •! N ••i 11-0-1 'If U ti ij r33 1 t! t[ .V (1, vl U rt! !1 [) nl fl, t! (1 of :) of N ;� 9.11 u 1! (I at ri •th at II II 't1
Ill at 11 .-I 11 11 (1 of 11 11 N If I • U
IZ yp C4 1 al It l . I N{ 1 ! t ,( 41 l I I: 11 rd .13 13 to I V 0I - I ;e r I s) N
I W ! I! [ 1 I1 I I LI I t to VI nl n A: V1 a) r-1 .1 u 1 • Id • U! •.1 at .r 1! 11 (1 a) N ; , a}
1' t, 1, . ! •1 .r! n,1) ti at 1.1 IUd t! a rl Al 11 t t! .rr u 1 01 eI' 1t.
11r•II nj :t '11 [' U n� l,+ n1 1! ,rl tl 11 r al [1
'11 14 11
11
1• 1 j t! r 1 al N� q .11 1� 11 -rj I I I), t! [1 a! I t t • F t1 [) t 11 rd (1 01 at 0) I '
t� Id a1 -.1 11 If Vj on I1 U 11 1-. t: S1 •1 :�+. r1 f+1 •j V1 N'to 1 N (1 [1 •11 1;
t1 V) N .r! ,-1 a) II -• 1 l) II [: •-I F} of (I 11 '• l! U .11 +tl 1 (1
`l 11 v. t) 0) P! a 'to tit n) rll m r11.1 to 1) Up 2-1 11 r) ;t ;t N 11 11 n. �r VI a '(I nt tI )1 .1; •1
a l v J I ,t t! na a) u 11 •4 I1 fl. 1 c, a1 nl al { 111 t1 a1 nr U 1 +I I n! .r r+t 11 Ut
C J rl t: t m m il+ nt ' f N 1 � nl • 1 -r� nl N tl V) U 1 t r) -L) to Ut 11 :i 1 r n� to ..1 Ut
c 1 I•, 1r al 1r al U+ nl (I11)� I! v1 :1 A: II 11 In Ut of t I) t t
Ill nl I., VI rl I1 al •r l of 'to I) at 1 al ' [: t1 1 lF f 1 1 :t
U ••1 nl (t n! 1; .rl t! lt+
Lf)icy d l i of f l I1 I I l l I l• 1 al �, +1 t tl al
�j o S 1) 11 1r a1 11 () tl ar 11 f1, , , Ir 1► U tf • 1 [1 v t11 v1 a) rj al I of [!
�i N al t I 1 N I1 tl nl U 11 N .r,' [! [1, LI I E1 • i •r; 11 U r 1
'� iI' 11 of :1 u al •.1 '1 ! O ,1 11 O t -1' f Rl Vt , , f , In I1, v1 Iv ,-1 41 ,t VI E f1, c� . 1 a] I 1 tq N • 1 11 ') t j 1-)
.� (1 t� •� II 11 r1 J tt t! al t. �, U 11 fl .- t1 .I; rf n1 nl a N r•t .-1 1t 11 11 t)' 11, ni
11 ) al .11 of n1 U )1 l) R,t II () 11 VI of 11 A VI 1.1 111 .j [1 ll N � l � •I n1 ;f [,
al I. I vt • • I U [i Al U u al f , :t F I l a) r'
+ram at d 0 Qt t1 1) fit 11, :-1 ,e N'tl ;�, •! t1 ( t! f: �. 0) :•1 it, N ni () () .j J] N .! E� 11,
1) 1 ,
u o Q 411
Ul -.1 of (1 uI m . ! 1 •-I nl N a1 nl ln••1 'tl 't or III rl tl 11 Xj tr IJ .-1 ar Ii N N N 1}�
AlN 11 , ! [1 VI .J !( to UI r) tl f UsJ! r; I I: .q n � 1 I to m U 11 [1 fl, u •U 1 [, to rl I( I) al ;r (1 at
.� Ell y Ir .t '•I [t, 11 :�, I! • I II • I al a) (: 11 nl n [1 =I .•, n1 !1 '1 •-1 I al 11 • I of a) •-I t1 U+
IO _Q1 U .-t t • [ tt . 1 01 1 11 t d 1 , ,.r! 1) . 1 . ! 111: to '(� I1 '11 :.1 01 ,V • I 1 11 t), [t. UI nl al al al al Ip tj t 11 a! a) U �r 11 1, 1)1 • I1 Q � ►'I r�y•• f JI {I,X1 .1 •• .- [ j� �#�' ( ! [i t U V 11 (Il al 1, 4)' (r! rl ( ••1 It [!
P4 � H H JLi n i 1 V1 Et x� 41 p, V1 11 t�] !) ;x (l} t1 1! '�U,• u1 N, (N1i [i v [1� 'A It U Xi i.r aI N 11 rt� Jl a nl
F! '� E I Il .x I), v) E 1 111
z

d 14 ,lrt. t.�}My,y •� y�3�t. {ry '!+. l�,ttir.�. �. ,�y{g•'���..
i.4� ti o i• +k
!!;( rI�_ r.
� h• r•••
tip
( :t'�'r..
1', •� f ;�'��'•`',...:'�'��4!J''• lr I.a •€,Zit_ '�.e-./ 'L •.
I` � •.4•'C:•M.; � fT''• �•ir, 1 it � 1 � •it! � ajT,: a.�,,
�; +i;�h;�t a�� t??�Y:� l:'�;�N=; �,r%l.�r yil:'.�.1`�i!.r)r/Fi•r' .n.� �e
r�, .t�- 1 :�•' ,'�' :��rrrl,u�y•�-yt4i�}r lr�:_�•�,.y✓� �' �L�: �.; �;'. �• 1�::+,�i� �t'.
11 1 r � �11}�, `,(: T `�AA;nt�� '' �°' +t ' t tr '!"' �f •ri• f� .• l� :�.� � , r. �it��].[yT�r •
qr* � t�r{t�. �` r��; � "+Y'.5 �1 �tiFt•- 4►, ��•;��3� `� , }�� JST�1�' `�'1�P�+�w�
5•:jay - •a7�.►�1 i „'�,': - ' t. , Yll�� t• r p'�h.. r ,.+r:.r,:; ..:.
''GG .Y �� r��".jl�*7 t`•., r r y �f ^I`i'i' :r r' +a.�;� i✓-
ri1 � jj r•�Tr1 {.a'Z, ��, ! � �,IL?:I •'i•y
�.. ,^i+��•r•i�'1��J� 1i*.r.:''+�.!'�
.� ., ,�� �� :{� 7r;4s'.I i �' i,,i�. :•, r 1 ;;�1 'ir�� f�• i'. Y.lil
; �� ��1+�r-u{,'�� �• t.F, �a' rr-`�• '..y�?r.;t'. 4�,t T }y.t �+�"►�,.r)i�►_;!�2'i
•' 11 �i4v., �;:..��,:��� :r y;yc��nF �'•r ••! r't. F! .
c�.t,�l� � �.'�l ��I T H x•. :. � � 3?.r1tR' ���� .'.�,. �j lj',. }r�' ,�j�� - (��t^; �t'Y�,'r ��✓
,rtr
+i�
tRIC. .. f•A�}i t '�,,I��k * r `�}?�
�{ i ri .1' 1 • ..s{.e. �t Si. s.;��y�{7;[} N f�,+.^�`, t qj r
1 r�'• �i'y'. i �.. • rr �'••►. -�'. li � • , �k.Y�' -•,t� • r� �'rs
y� r ��r � �1 �' �n •'ti 1yt � ••tt '�t �,T '!" } hYki i ,',r5 'ttf.Y,r/�; �rt.' i`1•sY l ��rj1l{�' ��.._e-:µ�
%r4T7 fir �s �1f� t•r `�t►r �'"1�.� Fel�'ltiY:+_ e'i•: j::.::
r �A�- ter. #`{},1'►. i�t 4 A,1at ,�,5.1'}u1•' 1 r• Via,
'! r r+ {-;r=�� ' s�y !M t�7ti rr12* Rt+rt�j)� x nti.► tii t, ' i ; %� �i ;,
i �i•f!M'+j V•r` 41.t iaa.i.'
-•;r r s r;''�1/: r s r �•'d! r 'i' ,-•�'� a"a
�.r,��,1'.r�,f f,`+.Y.�t+�.!{ t•,:.{1 �'4��';,}'.fu'�14.. '�F`�r"'�'i'�y,•il;'I 4.f*t,r..;'?���•1.1•r�\^••i;r��.;�'.�'�,�'•!�'�
AO
�Tw �, i11� �•I tlr i n j•ra,' T,t '! r< !r c :'': �s.' Y• r N4: L`. �••
y, • 1T /r i. F L A. 1 r 'r ! y , �� i {. 4! ,.f'f.
}yYY / (1�1•7• , ' • 1! ��## +�. � '�+ �'+ - r ,.� ;, ral:l+r=,i. ty`�.. 7 e ._
r A,�,,� *y.�� s"� j �• 't...y,[ }�' �' h 1�:Y{.r �{ �:+.V 4 r tC' 1 }eY.�!•'3'�J'`tirl�� •'' }: : 1
•} i, -. rr- i' a f as `'�;'
rir,rf's7'
�{
'a�-�• V,r' t • / ,4 i" } v. 1 rrl • 1 t -s
t 4 •:) t` A'+ 1}. it .! r.�if f r .�1; {+4- •�'�♦ fy: J✓ EJ •ry if ► E 2,:_. - sr -' •r-.
�' i ?•{;,s ry'+ *•`yi.k fY� ti1� �Rr44ylt�,
` _ �,/ Irr��ai•'r t,;° 1 ryt.•ti A.r+. ',�+ �• :� r, 4's��}-`{ry:d�T'e:_y:'ia rt,. ! ,r•rl fi �r•.wf-..•�•.,,,lt r �.r.
! . � 7� l.f:r -- ` .+ _ 'ri � J �: „ I!- +:. ►. a. t 1�a :Jyt >•<w,i y2. ' 1 � - s 'r,a
l�# .7flE�� s�ti'., wr}r-a^'J-k, .. t'j iJ j-rF I•, 1-- :�'r�, 7�t►s] !- � ,r✓ (�•r,T-y'!{,-r .f- ,r � -
T}+
r r• •4?l_ ,� -,r- -. i� r, 1 '�t s��• �%'1•..1 fS. r rt j.'�r+{" wir rt{° `. ..'y,f1(i � a! 1a..r t ! ,a•�r., `�T
dry ��} + � ! 1 ,..t JJ .f • A , 1 a a 's ,r! I' r �':.�J r' ' ! , ,. �
�{ +t�.: a Vj'r.�'f r J 3 t ''a 1~ �a v rht� � +t •, � rr],r +t
.,1 7ya� � �`% wa'�•'•�ikt- �r ,� � r t• 'i {- '�1 �.t. Y�•!l� A�~ lake r �. _-^:.+�J
f'�T '•)l�\ t1r,��,��: ••y•:�: ,''�::�, r%r i �; , r,, � s-ti�/t S,aT •t�a :r i1. � ,a, a ���.� ,T`
i� /)��'.S,+fl.j''� + 'l.r��•r .,.' ' t ; '�t��c.71' :;,' :r4•'i''''1�.1r- r' ? i=i y�i�rala�; •'t'�•r�+ t Rat
` " �t r � + :,y � +'r; , }, t. ° .. 1::.�..5. y'r ,'r w tr.-siaa' rh'�"t't.�...r•, _ 'a.')��'
�� 4 01 t1 ; L � y ! j +�.rls• . �,+ } r•` r - �. ..�-'a r,..� t.ILi
+.r��,.�� rF•r•+•_,. `\.��t .�.�.-C- i..'t�.•'.: _..',..,. a'.,..._ r �'s,;,�i-�'-n{±�.}J� �r:,�e�:1�T+:: �i.`.�`r:"rr� �!'.=.

All •Haste apvuc :tian suer :gust be at lest _00' from a 100' Ear: a well.
For swine waste =Diicdcn sites GsMbiishd/cUns;Mc.zr ari*r 10/1/9::
• The 0utC: =-MC.= of the 1„rtd --- ante wiaic ;vrste is appiied s:._'. 'se zt ;rst SO' From any
prope:ri boundar/ or any pre -mini liver or str
Faciiid= can be sited closer ;a property bouad.;ri= and =id_-c-- wicn written ze=ssian of ;he grope_: r
awae: =rrded ,uuh the-egste of de-- s_
7 This is only apalic_ble after 1/1/971.
9 - Adequate 6 e_board varies a=rdia; to w&:thf-- the acalty has a waste a=ag—cac pi=
Lagoons designed bemre 9/L96 and Waste Stcrage Ponds:
• Tne miai=m adeauace fm--aoard should be 1' T 2-1 yes-. 24 hour stator unless more is
required is the facility's Animal Waste yLznag.ct Plan.
• For izcldes with spillways there should be a aboard of the 2-1 ,vet,:. 24 hour storm below
the a= of the spillway and I foot above the spiuway for s4actual sz:Eia.
I.agcaas designed sleet 911196:
• Same :s above uius an additional i:tivv Rziafrail" frcror which should be -ual ro or arrester
than [hd 7, r y . 34 haum storm
You may have co use your best professional estimare.
II Tnr= to the ince- irp of s lagoon/pond could be due o bur<aws. vegetation widh diamr'w >=" etc.
I2 . Such as facer of ve;e-.:.don as embaalonca�. siud; a�muL�rica. outside :vase:s draining into dhe !agates etc. .
If ,yes was answer^-_d far quesden 9, 10. 11. or L gad the simmdon gases an irtuae^_iare thr t m public hrith or the
eavimart:eac DWQ must be aadded.
13 Tais will mat be consida d a violation far all 'acilides. Frcffiries cc:dud ar•,e+ 10/1/96 are required to have
Iasvoa markers and wade; die ttra► gene-.,i pe=ts far =des �+W require laparx aia&= aria c 'aed.
14 If there is physical c ridrsca of over applicadca is e.cros of the :.mount stare; in the Waste Nfaaagemerc Plan
or it runoff errors the assets of the State DWQ must be aodfle3
16 This is only applicable m C-t fled fac`Iides.
17 This is act ;ping to be =c: only check yes if obvious w0te lspdng or aft tall►;ag to op=rcr.
I9 Iaigatioa equipmerc should be onsighr and able cc ccver :dl land aapIi dons sires or a contr-..r. with a third
party applic:ror should be available = part of the Ce.•dad Waste Xanagc•.,,.,eac PUuL
20 Cr daed AcimaI Writs .Maaagerae t Plans should be -c=iy available to re sic xGs/irisp rs,
21 To the best of the inspec:ar's/tsriewas ability m =11 by rerieming the waste aL=,err pf n and insa�a;
the &c iiry operadoa_ This indudes making sure the c• t population is act grater than the design t
=&ed fn the pian; the &=board is act less thaw what is rated in the plan. ex.
Z Road iexpiag includes waste applieadon recaras. sots and wasm analysis, cop yields.
23 If Yes is c.".eclmd thea the faflow-,rp visit will be caaducmd by the same sseac;r which =.--rzi the visit. Only
in the a lse of =Jor caviraacaW pmbfeats dcsistated by Sea= SM 1217 should DWQ be aetine.-. and conduct,
a foiiow-ua visit ate: a DSW review.
24 All =-,icwVmspeers should dsc= the visit with the awtzer or ope=r in c : r;: se char t: -. individual is fully
aware or any problems or issue st the facility.
Camrae: Lr. P!=e be as sae» ac as passible especi:,lly for any violations, If drawings or lasoons /Faccility would
helb future inspe;_ars pl=c tale the time ro provide some. Raccmmc.:dations may include informin; the
fhrt=r to contrc: an aucrapdare technic..l speralist for =istan=
1 l/1-'96

a nimai Operations Site Review and Site Insne Lion Information
Genera!ram lnforrncrdarr
• P!=c we a F c:iiri nutnbe: Whenc-ler possible, it is e:serdai that we be able to mare:4 it up to a fh= that
airec v a:asts in d2c database.
• Fz= Status is whet c ttta farm is relate-ed or c::tifled.
Pf=e rm a a note is the =riawliascecdca is as annual routine, complaint driven or a FpiIow up insger:iaa due
to previous problems.
•. Fasts arc sat requir-ed to lave a c=d1e--f operator undI Il1/9 7 but if they ah=dv have one please get the
pcsoa's aafzAe.
• T'ae desisa cpaci:v or the Farm should be the aumber of aaimais that the animal waste systa'-z
ac:crnmod_te, if this simuid starch the aum4.0 sta' in the ca:.iziec' clan. The :pima! oae;stians
database wiR calcui_te z; a ste=dr state live we:zht on the carra =arcing to the ;MRCS T=b Cui&.
• Latitude and Lan; :tide are far DWQ tc;'aaal staff to camcie,e or vc irk, Soil &Ware: Qevie-sers do pot
to a this In.
• If Subsur:..c Drains are present plcse deck the box, and check the lagoon arc or spray fie:d arcs box
accardlag to whex the drains are located. La most c#t===tom, the only way to know if dtere are subsurf=
drops are m check yRCS macs. die Aa mai Waste lrfaaage.: = ?fan, or ask the awaer or ahansser of the farm.
It win apt be possible to idczt a!I saosaQace ChM tiles.
Imrpe=err Quesrfcru
An axaatale of a buffer that ads mai w== would be oac with a lack of vege=dca. =sion. chauaels. or a
similar namdaa.
2 Discharges = be from hcu=. Rush systc=. Lagoons, storage goads. spray fteids, ex- Any discharge on any
Part Of the a:riity would ae=Ssi= a Yes aasvrc.
• Map -mach converan= are defined is G.S. 143-2I5(e) as pipes. ditch= or conveyances that
have bet coma =d For the purpose of wtiIfufiy discharg e; pollumars to the ware= of the
Sense. '
• If a dis�a tamed smile* artier or by7asses a lagoon syv= DWQ taus, be aatiue:L
4 oa pasmre in or 4ar---t to a body of water
witlh evidcc= of ware; quality pmblcts
6 Se:hack C:�tedz vat f defending as wtum the Waste sty was built:
For all Lima=
• At legit ICT from =7 vx0 fbr hamaa coasurapdoa.
For Lagoons with a ary or ewuaasioa can=C:dba site evalumtion a&—211193. astd before I011195. setback
critcia Is:
• At lc= 7;0' from=' public m are, c: =!L picric are : piaygt;uad, eat.
• At It= 750' fsvm any tezWe: c artier than the Farm awne; or their tenant.
For swine houses and lagoons with a new or &-pansion caasavciaa site evaivation afmr 1011195. and before
IC11196, smb=k cd=ia is:
• At le= IW from env pratre:ty beundar/
• At le= LOW Bata any ==ied trxidatce
• At lc= =W from say ski. hospital orclturclt
For swine houses and lagoons with a crew or =attsion ccasaucdon site evlivation liter I01I196 setback Criteria
is:
• At le-t :W Pram znv pragerty bound:r,
I Ill-'96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd
Clayton NC 27520
Dear Glenn Boyettte:
January 11, 1999
As� 0&
NCDENR
NORTH_CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF-..
ENVIRONMENT AND 'NATURAL RESOURGEs
i
rj,, l- 2000
a
1 �J
Subject: Application-No.-AWS510127
Additional Information Request
Glenn Boyette Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 10, 1999:
l . Lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any site
evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
2. Operation and Maintenance Plan.
3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented at this facility should be identified (check
the appropriate BMPs) on the Odor Control Checklist.
4. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) shows that animal waste is to be applied to vegetable crops. The
Swine Waste Operation General Permit has a condition which states "Application of animal waste onto
land which is used to grow crops for direct human consumption shall not occur following the planting of
the crop or at any time during the growing season. Application of animal wastes shall not occur within 30
days of the harvesting of fiber and food crops for direct human consumption that undergo further
processing." Please verify that your WUP as written will meet this condition, or have your WUP revised if
necessary.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter,
must be submitted on or before February 10, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely, l
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina'
Department of Environment
anO Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
November 12, 1999
Glenn Boyette
Glenn Boyette Farm
1387 Loop Rd -
Clayton NC 27520
1 •
NCDENR
No�-TM_CAF, % A,DEPARTMENT OF
ENV RON4 ewr AN©INAiURAt- RESOURCES
VVAcT'ER QUAL.ITYSEC i 10N
10EC 0 8 :�
Non-Disch��e �almitl#ng- --
Subject: Application No. AWS510127
Additional Information Request
Glenn Boyette Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Glenn Boyettte:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by
December 12, 1999:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) was written for surface irrigation. Please have a technical
specialist revise your WUP for subsurface irrigation.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information.
All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The
information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before December 12, 1999 or the Division will
return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be
considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-2I5.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
cc: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number,of-Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
GLENN HOYETTE
1387 LOOP ROAD
CLAYTON NC 27520
1-919-553-4094
14q RQ �N ED
�F0170►'V
Non-Dfacharge pelmid;
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
2480.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Soil Incorporated --Z7A rrTiah P/p.5fi,C T"
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

i
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method. shown.. above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2480 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 4712 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2480 hogs x + lbs PAN/hogs/year = 0 lbs. PAN/year 99a o /b5
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
--_---
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
- N
- - TIME
5 600
11270
CeB
C
SI
96
120
0
SEP . JUN .
"
$-/,),4 Aerr%.
11270
�-4,5,
C
88
110
0
5
550 �
�$641
isi
�JUN. SEP.
IJocLkle
G,- flu
kv f
11270
4,5,6
CeB
C
120
150
0
7
B
S I
11050
MAR--JUN
Sw
fer
11270
-4,5,
CeB
C
88
11d
d
7
770
6
SI
MAR-JUN
et
0
,
11270
4,5,6
CeB
C
96
120
0
6
z�
e
isi
1720
MAR-JUN
0
ap
11270
--4,5,
CeB
C
96
120
0
6
7�
6 -c-
isi
1720
MAR-JUN
'11270
4,5,6
CeB
C
80
100
0
✓
S I
16.13
1613
MAR-JUN
{!{7
11270
4,5,6
CeB
C
88
0
6.13
674.3 !,�
SI
114t
1 JUN-
SEP.
1L
It In
9127
1
C
96
120
Q
lWaB
SI
I
111.4711376.4ir
MAR-JUN
ar
9127
-1
C
120
0
lWaB
SI
196
111-4711376.4
IJUN.SEP.
TN
� '
!
I I END rs I I I I I I
TOTAL18450.1
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen. _ m._
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners.must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
- __AC
--'
-USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
7857
2
FaB
C
120
150
0
9
1350
MAR-JUN
7857 1-2 1 FaB
SEP. 4� //��
L Y,
END
.)eeT [.pry
C 88 110 0 9 1990
JUN-
TOTAL 2340
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
CORNS hf A-rn0 o� , elllo. �.-3
r
S
lr�s�
BUSHELS
1.25
%arnq/ccu 6rrrJ c�

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
*A
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
4
8450.1
9
2340
10790.1
* BALANCE
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to -equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 0 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 0
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 0 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 0 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of -the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
M", 160 d e-. /JIfS �YpX• y7'6d /�%�Yrs oT�ClGrrf GrYJ!!r'i—
kp fj�I57/c ek//U✓C /7e /•'OW S .5�r'�9cu fl�rri'rs.
'�Oazr X-5
//t' p/6-0 0/du le eY
o Z&- ����? A��/ ih 7d,-err /�v.� 7`�-Q•��/'�' /1!�;
A� r.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall.
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons _
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
_11. Any new swine_ facility, sited on or after October .1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied -'closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or'
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:GLENN BOYETTE FARM
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: GLENN BOYETTE
(Please print)
signature: Date: /a - 3— Tr
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
signature: j Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. Smith
Affiliation:MRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: ate:
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, 14 -9 - X , hereby give
per mis on to appl animal waste from his Waste Util' ation System
on �cres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: X1,1 Date:
1 _
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:, yu� Date:
SWCD Representative: f' - Date:
Term of Agreement: Lam- 3-Cl9 , 19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
. 19
My commission expires
( SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

liE'' a.. n�/. � � - - i Fjfp �';5 . `1 •
Q'C �cvMb(j%1A
89'�a„a+��i�t � � !p .'�. � �" 5 �.; i,� ���Yay� 'A ,s7.a - ik' . a :•�03 -
ur�-
�.�r 'S cr ti � xy't•.�F
iaf,1 °-1 'V " r ��•• ,y}<< �i `�.?i � 1 I a � c �':'ak�4-.4. Y�` '<.+'
;e-5 r.l�'a k y 4A0 _ta4 f'f r, JIJ .i d'� .J'� radt.•-' Cif 7 ` it
a 0
'?}rr m'� ,. �.. r w. �•�`, fit, r . p .'��tp y7F tr.
}
'j �,-�'�=ni ���nn° s��� '4� . � � f b'- \ ..eh .ts O I,/ r5 i•-, -ss; Ir #' /
pogg �"�� .� �, + y"�d,; �y��. �mfr� i°� y,r •p �- ,, Ai� • R;'
� a p1 - � • I �'�- ^/�_.' / , :.w � sty
Pi ik.
��. k �}. �Ir � 1' t ,;wl /• �� ' Hof' �# � r,� // � — _a,/�/ ��?, � `�t\
p� T � '� 'k P .y f � O 1L7F p ;. • _ 9 • T
g �[ ; 4 �Y1'�Fa. ,-a ir• -� ��� ._� 77ff[r^^Il 1. / /.f.'
try <t Rrd s-ri 41 +.k{ � �' • Si ° W i
w i
+
w
.? i-b £ .tl o� ��+ -.'r "p'- i l#; r3i S °. ►'S.• w' .r a ,,,�+.N , w. -' �.},a a ?�?5 f r
�,fbe„ ;.. �'-.- d{• {'' .01'
q t s'� r �3 r FgrPi,�'3 -r r p '''�'i�ii t t�f r(�Fy� � 5+, •r' t,!�a, ;i�aw ,,r!.
D P 1 .' h 1 C �� t �L�•_ �., q�t / .'■[�S� � - _ a�. _J W 7�- �C"i`,D' � ,.�y1 { rt� ., i ..
��•- LSr t�/ S 'N ,7, 0 �.0 , Lfif!''� fi, ,fa _ *!A' t' i}•� ,-�.
iE-
r y
d'a'•. r!/' •m,-t' `ti N'k A? �''d.' d-y pf yy /r' 'ik'�` d pj' a :.6..
4.N.(y�+ ,ice yy d 4}J�. I� P Mi�.'•O-_
� � oc Ca • �Ta?`P•��rf't�� ' p �+r, ,y' �a t - 4 e � rF '(* 10 y�YruT�q+,�ygppb{, 1�� ,y '4�'v ,r a•'
4vy S 3 i i 1�ue P Ark P" j 1i S
e as l<'ta �a '^ 16 }' syr f• II4`.
S �_ t�y�u°.�• �'a�' '� _ 3 yi �' ~ _ +r='y�,'i 3h t,a • � A �. pi p� .i i A9 � � �'Z.�41.1 � y�y � - � '��j
� ,e.,,,� F f"M � .r� "+'" . f a - 1fr•._•R5F � ' u �� h +� �°' r � � - �' �a'yr � � ���� ��� �x d§���• T ~� ' �r �t�w V PS'
�, � 'f I Via,. �{;ea�� 'b' w :7 � � �d� �i. � �•I �# I:N��rad � �'�tJ Sa �p r.y .'b
�,syy } a
� � � �� 51�� a �} r L d Iw, I� �aM j''��• � � M1f1 5, n r d:'r �'
' to n�' ��' �.ii�F 1��7,Vr '� _ ��•� i, ' s ��p � f� ,�;'
+•J:/ i -'�' ` � f � i t .r., k.:� fi - e � f 147y � o b,
r {�';•• � k''
' '+:� '`''h• Ir
�1Y" ' ,�+ Y . +n .._b, .v`-J) w �'r • i 1: € l i wP . lJ,, a •°g. •U!' S •�

R - 4

V �, r l
V -��i^ � � �J� ✓� � rj ��`�-.) �%�� 4 `'Pik' l7"�+��
ViN
'p
Iwo
WIT
r �f
rp-` cr) Y . (
h
2A"'t'

�'� . � -- v - - ,�-�,�,�-rr� ICE' ��vr�-r�r�-�--� �r�

94-

FERTILIZER SUGGESTIONS FOR SMALL FRUIT
C. M. MAINLAND and E. B. POLING, Horticultural Science; G. S. MINER, Soil Science
Note-. For best results, fertilize using sail test information. If unavailable, the general suggestions below may be used.
TABLE 10-3. FERTILIZER SUGGESTIONS FOR SMALL FRUIT
Commodity
Purpose
Matiti
Amount
Precauflons and Remarks
BLUEBERRIES
Growth first year
N. P,O,, and K_.0
40 to 80 b 14-28.14
Apply after first flush of growth and repeat every 4 to 6 weeks until mid-
iacre per anDhcation,
August. Extend application interval during dry periods unrit rainfall has
totaled 4 in, Based on 1,360 plants acre.
Growth second year
N, P,O,. and K,0
Double first year
Use same schedule and amounts after first application as first year.
amount at first
aoolicatidn oniv.
and fruit
N. P,O,. and KA
150 to 250 lb 14-28-14
Apply 213 of this amount before bloom and 113 4 to 6 weeks later (early
ment of bearing
(acre
May). Apply 10 to 30 Ib additional Nacre immediately after harvest if mare
Fde
vigorous growth is desired. Apply 50 Ibiacre of biammonium phosphate
(18-08-0} in mid -August to maintain plant vigor if P.D, is low or leaching has
been severe,
BLACKBERRIES
Pre lanl
Lime, P.O.. and i
Deoends an sail lest.
Growth firs: year
IN, P.O,. and K,0
200 6 of 10.10-11
Apply just after growth starts in spring (May), and repeal in July with another
100 lb of 10-10-10 if vigor is low. Spread uniformly in 4-inch bands around,
but not closer than 6 in. from thornless blackberry stems (about 0.25 lb
10-10-10 per plant). Apply fertilizer in a band at the side of thorny blackberry
rows but not closer than 6 in. from root cuttings or stems (about 5 lb
10-10-10 per too ft row).
Growth and }tiro
N, P_O,. and K,O
500 lb of :0,10.10/acre
Apply 112 the fertilizer in March and the remaining V2 in May. spread
development
lot lharny types. 800 to
uniformly in a 3-ft-wide band over the raw or sidedress with V2
of 10•ID-10.acre for
recommended fertilizer on each side of the row. Thorny blackberries may
thornless,
benefit from another 30 lb of N after harvest in July (100 lb of ammonium
niiratel.
RASPBERRIES
use same schedule as for thorny blackberries.
MUSCADINE GRAPES
Prepianl
I Lime. PA.. and K.0
Depends on soil test.
Test before oiantinR and aboiv P.O., K.0 and lime according to soil test.
First year
N, P.O.. and K_O
0,25 ID 10-10-10 per
Apply after growth starts gaie April to early May) and repeat in June and July
vine Per aoclicaaon
at 4. to 6-week intervals. Broadcast in a circle at least 18 in. from vine.
Second yea*
N. P,O,. anc K.0
0.5 to t 0-t o.10 per vine
Apply in March and again in May and July,
per acolicandn
Third vear
N. P_O.. and K.0 140D
!b 10.10-10acre
A ply in March antl apply an additional 30 is 40 Ib of N in July,
Mature vines
N. RO,, and K,O
600 lb 10-10.10racre
Apply Z3 in March (4001b) and 113 (200 Ib) in June. If more vigorous growth
is desired. add an additional 30 lb Nlacre in July- Maintain soil pH at 6 or
above with dolomiliP lime. Spray annually just before bloom with 1 lb
Solubcr f20% B) per 100 dal water.
BUNCH GRAPES
Same as muscadine schedule. Petiole analysis can show which nutrients
are or may became deficient. (Between July 15 and August 15), Contact
your county Cooperative Extension agent for further information. Select the
'
vouncest mature leaf from a bearinc crimary shoot well exposed to light
STRAWBERRIES
Growth of new planting
N
30 to 40 lb Nacre
Apply in May and repeat in August or September an sandy soils. An
Matted -row
additional 20 to 30 lb Nlacre may be applied in Janua .
P.O_ i and lime
Depends on soil test.
Test before planting and apply P-O.. K.D. and lime based on soil test.
Growth and fruit
N
30 to 40 lb Nracre
Apply in Au ust or September and in sandy soils again in January,
and f4O
300 to 400 Ig of
Apply after harvest. It soil test for P and K are high, 30 to 40 lb o1 N may be
development
10-10-to
used ralherthan 10.10.10.
STRAWBERRIES
Preplant (fall)
N
60 lb'acre
Broadcast and incorporate before bedding. Ammonium nitrate or a complete
Plasticulture
fertilizer (if P and K recommandedl may be used.
P,D„ tCrO, and lime
Refer to soil test. It not
Soil test before planting. Broadcast and incorporate before bedding. Lime
available, apply 60 lb
should be appi 3 months before planting.
P,O,and 120 lb
K,Olacre.
Drip Fert+ligation (spring)
N
V2 to 314 Ibiacre/day
Begin biweeklytssue testing when plants commence growing in the spring.
Adjust rate or snit applications depending on tissue test interpretation. Can
apply in 3 or,4 applications over a 12-week period (3- or 4-week interval)
beginning with firs(growth.'
Other nutrients
Deoenas on Issue test I
Biweekly tissue tests will indicate need. If B needed apply at V8 lb Bracre.
r1s xrzy� b�lol
f�j
396 Chapter X — Fertilizer Use

FERTILIZER SUGGESTIONS FOR NURSERY CROPS
T. E. BILDERBACK and R. E. BIR, Horticultural Science
TABLE 10.6. FERTILIZER SUGGESTIONS FOR NURSERY CROPS
Kind of Production
Amount to Use
Remarks
DECIDUOUS TREE -
50 lb mtrageni or 16 oz'1.000 sq I of bed.
Surface apply after first true leaves. Second -year beds receive 11 to acre.
SEEDLING BEDS
Other elements should be based upon soil lest.
FIELD PRODUCTION
1st year. 50lb of nitrogenfacre incorporaled as preplanl: 2nd year:
Work in sail before planting 1 st year. For field grade fertilizers, apply 0.67 of
0.510 1.0 oz Wplant; 3rd year 1.0 to 2,0 oz Nlplant. Do not exceed
total amount before bud swell, 0.33 in June. Other elements should be based
100 to 200 lb of Nil
upon soil test.
CONTAINER PRODUCTION
All essential elements must be provided when soil -less mixes are used to produce nursery crops, Dolomitic limestone and minor elements are
best incorporated at planting.
Rates may change with irrigation and soil type.
LIME AND FERTILIZER SUGGESTIONS FOR VEGETABLE CROPS
D. C. SANDERS, J. R. SCHULTHEIS, and J. M. DAVIS, Horticultural Science; C. R. CROZIER and S. C. HODGES, Soil Science
Note, For best results. feRilize according to soil test suggestions. If soils are not tested, the rates below may serve as guides.
TABLE 10-7. LIME AND FERTILIZER SUGGESTIONS FOR VEGETABLE CROPS
At Planting' llblacre)
Sidedressing'
Crap
Desirable pH
N
P10,
K,O
(lb nutrientiacre)
ASPARAGUS
6.5
80 to 100
20
150 to 200
Apply V2 before first harvest and 112 at last harvest. PO, is applied only the
year of planting.
BEAN. LIMA and SNAP
6.0 to 6.5
601070
80 to 100
60 to 100
20 to 30 lb N'
BROCCOLI. CABBAGE,
CAULIFLOWER. COLLARD
6,D to 6.5
60 to 80
60 to 80
80 to 120
30 to 4C to N
20 to 30 Ib N every 3 weeks for 3 applications.
CARROTS (Proc-j
6.0 to 6.5
40 to 60
60 to 100
80 1d 120
CUCUMBER'
6.0 l0 6.5
601080
60 to 60
60 to 80
30 to 40 It N
LETTUCE
6,0 to 6.5
50 to 60
100 to 120
100 to 120
15 10 30 to N
ONION
60106.5
35 to 50
70 to 100
80 to 12D
40 to 50 Ib N
apart.)
POTATOES'
5.8101
120 1c 160
60 to 80
12C to 160
SUMMER SQUASH
6.0 to 6,5
601080
60 to 80
60 to 80
30 to 40 ib N
Use 40-0.120 at last cultivation plus 20 lb N 30 to 40 days later.
SWEETPOTATOES'
5.0 to 6,2
30
60
30
TOMATO, Ground'
6.01e 6.5
50 to 60
8010 120
80 to 120
30 to 60 lb N, two applications 3 weeks apart. starting when first cluster forms,
Trellised (Mans)'
6.5 to 6.7
50 !0 70
200
210
30 lb N every 3 weeks. start when first cluster forms.
Trellised C.P. `
6. to 6.7
40 to 50
100
100
I NJ 3 weeks. scan at fruit set,
20 lb N every 2 weeks, al firstfrower and after leaching rains unfit 6 weeks attar
Processing'
621 6.5
50 to 60
60 to 100
100 to 150
transplanting
WATERMELON'
6,010 6.5
40 to 50
40 to 60
10010 120
20 to 30 It N
I r twoapplications 3 weeks and 6 weeks
PUMPKIN'
after planting.
' The lower rates apply to soils high in fertility; the higher rates to soils lower in fertility. If
soils have not been heavily fertilized recently, use 1.2-1 instead of a 1-1-1 ratio and
increase fhe rate 3O%. On light sandy soils, use a 1-2,2 instead of a 1-1.1 ratio and supply
additional N as a sidedressing.
' Apply 1 to actual baron (B)lacre, preferably in the mixed fertilizer.
' Apply 20 Iblacre preplant in coastal plain and sandnills.
` The pH of mineral -organic soils should be 5,2 to 5.5.
LAN lO /a 7,—)
Pe
PP �
.Swveli
T low /I To 11f
5 l r.N w
U ►n kill J /aft
r�
//611A//
° For Jewel, Beauregard. and Hernandez varieties. add 0.5 lb of actual boron (B)facre in
preplant fertilizer to prevent 'blister.' roller apply 1.25 lb of Solubor or an equivalent
material per acre al 40 and 80 days after planting the Hernandez variety.
° To prevent boron deficiency. apply 2 Ito of actual boron {B)lacre before or at planting. If
desirable, the boron may be in the mixed fertilizer. For drip irrigation, apply 0,5 It of actual
boron (Bllacre biweekly. Refer to AG-489, Plashculture for Commercial Vegetables. for
detailed information on fertilization.
s
398 Chapter X — Fertilizer Use

—C �r.O�r."— .ram G —_ .._ 1G �— � C _ . _ �: � � ✓ ��i\ � _—:: Gr � C� _rr r "
.. , ..
cC52.`: w:� �c�s:+c�� �r2 `YC--cam: cam... `Sa:: _�Cc:* •ice -: r"2S �a :..�,..
::C _-=c:..- _- - -_ --- ,. :1.^.l. ✓a ✓2C --- . =S
szz :J2s2C
G+�GGr.�.L n.—. :mac_ _ P..—.._ S'-_.. .+ _ _JG_r_✓ _,..P— ... _ !Gr �.^y
r: .7 r.+?.S2C G�S2w - �_C C- . ,:2 r_ -.+c✓Oar �Gr�C ✓C=C_ -Sa a.SW
' S_:a'�CCr.0 � ^C c'::✓�� _2 S�::o �_:.� a...raS".::C - -!' ... -} S
zc7z= syr,zp11/0.�7 .: .: z ^a=�o=
YOYr �_�... w.� Cr GM ..rr ✓O �Crr2 a✓ 4vrM w. 4. rf ._Y.+ 2 C1 JO lri Y/G a� rI�'`✓I�S
72-=r:B C)= v:. Z--n✓aZ - iIC-�C:7?OSd
....wo r = s :;.a--�_.,. �o ar:12� a;�y ac--�-�.�zW cW • sca �aa�d �070
=;s=ar.-ss.:c a� as-2 -1,novs
LMss_ asa :: =a za _ , +a:...'S S' a=s===s
or" µC^�: rC `.+. "'-Gw S Ja�7:: S` ^.S '�Grte=T.=LS .I7 G nS`'G~ f.-...wrE
za; swoz za= S--- =a =2 _ --==a _.. C` _ tea- _ dz
=9 S=-t
r C,.. T rG _C Gr.". r� '�.�..-O r..0 v� ✓C- :2' a.". CC:.. C'•S G-S2:`: I C�r.,�,h
S`c- •«i2Cc� i' �J:. ..a :2:: a'2- �2A'c :::2 ` Sa"-✓2Co.^. o_^..:'S-C%a
.Z=7S L SG_Lr ';I❑ -=cam -" - _%:E.=Z �`7 a 72'i Aa.t'."-r
7Dj a.:---= :: =
cr.i,:
2= -��.�. v� =C S ✓va: o: - :�aS2� cCS2!`: 1.- =2 7- Y.
r:S^ '
G S2 G% ✓ —JG�1P 1'+_—Cr.+lCr^-i Gr2 Srvr�C� �Grvlia�j'
�+~r..+fr �� 4T 1+VrC arrt �V 5✓�P'i. .r .-S -mar
USZ S- Z7=Zn= C::c , LS =2 t CS ':;a5-c : C=t a
a-2 arc=a: : Szt.77=
a �:1G-'S o�52±.+� f:1:. r;:-� L a�; S2 :aaSC=:,-=- Sasn z'aZd
SZ5. s`;.� ;.a- ic3s aq�cT s- a,s's:: a � a.:p=r. s= La-
=CZ �Gr"` .cf �a2- - 27 72-.0 : a" z =o = 10— a r,
S=n'=BZ CT :raZ7 -::27C
w o i::.,— � oc=�ar,a_ c _ a Yzc :.s , . oa_s
2 =_ .-a 2 '.:c- a: _S-_ .: -1r+2_ "2'= �2 =:1Qt. 2�52:: 94z
SURII(W9d GBJB40910-UON i � � k
66610 l 93A.3
j&ep �/ moprzadp ad .L
f,6of, - £'ss' -6�6-aIIorrca�s,
N011038 kJ1100 2MM
a3AI20318kPs/-lO 2� �41944e7v 'oWoj, s007 LSD'/ :IIon�oZ
iiaq /Vn'-:?7-> :ZGZ)nJOZa
;�77:1 a. �q C), — " ......

WA, S T -LAN ...
...... .... .. ....... .. ....... ...........
.=curt of ;caste Prcd=csd Per 7_ar(ca!? cis, �-T, -cns, e ,_, . )
a?'YgO ate: -m s X.__l .. (ate= . } was to / z..,:.-�.a? /year 4171A 7 .4V'_S
r1E'QL'�� Or 7T 3L'y �V21.'-12�'T a s���—^.C•o,r (��T� 7r..4r.��.e� der 4va�
x a?, 3 ? s . s / aw_:.a1.! y e as — .S7o ,� :. s . ? AV /yea= .
(PA.*i ;_cm n. C. GU-4 de st-. 633 )
Acnl_v4--c t�:e move a=auat of wasta _s a y1c job. `_cu sr.culd plan
t� e an_ have accr;,cr_ata ems:: -=rent tc accly -.he waste w" a tely
inamne- .
:e �a1? owe ac_aace w:.' 1 he nee_e_ `ar waste ace? _ca.t_cr.
�e c_ ap to be c_ ;- and -6---- ace at— , _ca}wen
Tract _ =e? c Sc_l C_c_ L;,s
^'•_rre - ?ss Ac .
40
1 y I 404a4"
+ SV orr 444,11
/ Sd
I . 3 1 / 3 9.S
1 4Afi4L - 4q I-.
fl ! 6- /<F*
! /°!E%,W.; I
/ d O
4 I 46.0
1
!.�-iJ I �/LEn►�
Tt1�19:yF3 f
I �
! I 7
LY - O GT
I !
1 I
! I
I
v n
! /. I / 6 0
1 4"Oeic - orgv
I
I 'Tw�
as
* .T
scz:rces are a=, 14ed, t;;,ev ==s= be
be _6ased C.. real is-_ T_ e r 4 OX=eCtZtj Cr!
NCTE : #__tar 's ca=-C— :e . a— ? a :d ra T �e ever acc��ed
Y 1°0- - — Caascal
Zcre Ya :ace_ -en= ,mac= w_11 sc=e eas=sr; Ccc�-.es
d Ycr= : Carc_r:a to �ave a=3.^_acera== " :as � a= acdresses
a?? :L=_ -er=s . M_U_s =Ia.= cs? •r addresses :7_' t=aces .

�..,:...:.,...Z-.Z��' N ........PLAN'.., ........... ...... ___.........
Tate t e ? : :+G'%cS W-__m 0R i.:NG ==ma`s :.- z.
(.� aeaeat rim adjacaat I=damer ust be attacred)
{Requi�ad oalp S_ operstor does oat arrs
adegs:ate land [sea Requ-1 . ad 21)
Sci Cco= N 1C_e5 L::S.
see _ar =ab1s 1.
T.: to T s f :C.^.. 2 :cve Ta.! Ies
tic= eS L. S . N
U1-'__oec
a.;:Ze I 1-715-77
'�'a�
Total. A S. &�-
r�+:.OL': v� N ?_ccaced
ar Defic78
N��'. ��e
►paste ff�� r�cat�o�
P?ay -�•-s�
cca�a�: � c�-s-css ��
ger-oc:ic
+aye a��?�c3t-oa v�
si�cge a�
acrccc_c -aces. ff�e
s1udge w-?_'
be r-c^ a=d wi-'
=easel. es
Over a;.==
Z;:=_ -e :_s c—

k�ASTE: UTIL3ZATi0N-PL-ati --
See at_ac.!:ed =a: s. cw_yg tie -elds to be used for ti.. st;_';_at?c=
a; :waste -:racer.
gyp_ iicatic= c: Waste bg
I�= sic I Sc_1 A%,;, e Czc= A==1_4 ca__ot Apci
NC. S Ra=e(7_k/ z) n.:.:.L��(�_-• )
.S ,.a= :s xC x=F= :S VAS_ mc_' 8E__4 c Xprt_= BY 601m7m a =Aa= aC
7 Z7 FOR 2RS CR
vcL -s ces'_�ec ;cr fig° days c; s-z ace and
tt-e te_-=cra_r s =csac_ a .:.Ls t he zemcvec c : .ce ave=ace of ec_e eves r
- : no --s4�..^.ce s"'CulG he Voi,e C.z ;;as a se c +
s :.^.= eG you
Call the local Nam,_ -al Resources Ccnse=- at::c= Se; :' _s (_c=e_?_•r
Sc.il Cc=servat_c : Sew rice) or sail and Water Coase-7at_cn
❑___ce a te= _vau receive the waste analysis _ecar! _cr assistance
1 ..1 ram. 4_ i n r- q .41 �e 1 1r T� =
_... ca,.} e1 .....e a_.cun} L pe_r ac_ tc alp a�d t�e : _ape=
sate =_-lcr tc a=p1y4-q the *waste.
Na, r3i;7L C = Q�eY�` ^T: .Z'Q�'/(r,¢jlr�✓ 0A1 7-M is f�'��'7 !✓/�L .[3 /�
?"�P/LA�cr ��P.F/�r�-✓ sysr�m �.✓ v�'�T1¢dc.E �.Pa�s. .4 s�•�r..-..- ,¢..-.o
✓ i M 6 ¢ Sfb p,✓ �h'� T/A►E' TfiC I� ki.¢.s co.v roc .
1sT/.vim F .Pvg4S i°�pavr0� r4�: SE � �sFFE�'S /��� �"��`!- ✓ F�'P
f IS Oc A AI G E Alf"Pi 9 0 ME /4 9 3
✓D Q. doKF S�r✓d 5 T i✓ G ST i"2� H.d�dET't� LSa •✓�� oG� s
ir1A�r�.✓ /-.Qu+�? THE FEA'T/�r�E�' NSE SEcT/v�✓ cG T/�F / ,47 A/aPT# c4yPo4
4

(.r - aC w ..✓r
-_::Z«.__.. �.^. :.cam
_�..�.... -�^�
�- - �» �?
... .. r..IO I ""'S S Gr.7E r✓ JC! _�9 a C r_ S r G_.S__ L ap rQ��
Qp
7
rG= ✓o-7aC �..._ ✓r= G�.i�M - �r� r? Cr•S.D...� r.Cr�
. L.Y} �--✓ �, c�S�� v-: L _�. v} .+.�. .io.i row a� .'r✓ _f Dl.)0
5
ISr•E� ��.'� _SGr. - _._ ��E_ w ��=r•Gr / ✓Vv-9✓r__' ✓ :p
ro-...zzz
_ v� a� �--� s^
:+ -v- - vim_ �
-_p_ ZaE azar =ad =c, 0 i rE=, ,a_Ea=$
� SSZ7 7-:^S G'Z= ZaS^. 57 T -
__-=S
►.: �r �w :�S":`.^."� e+«: ..�o� L =' ZD
ac�::: so•d ? 3—F r...- -- :;a77: 4 ac is= Fsp! ��r.r '
'17
o-z
c-aZ-. S5'Q ; t'o.:.cjc ►c� �D Ste✓ r :���.`.�
IF yD ''c��? -- -.:DS:'t `vD..�S:.i� a—ZaE .L? 'a:
ycc��
--ems ZO =� asps s:, a- -cs--aaZ mac_ S:,aas :asczrH
..
-rZ ✓C W-Xla ✓G I '=? a❑ T--ZrS G=372 - W a
• ✓`w+ C 1'!+-�j r�9 r.✓ ` `. wwJ .+�-w_w_� .w-.r7w a= l S7
7
E S! ZZ.Z= =O-'r
-4 Gw~.laS 6.•r+�_ � L �.lE_ O-. �V r,�TL'Mw✓ Ors � D �r r L .1+r-Sr�n.✓u�..Jar
a.+r 97 _� !� _ I ��. E� r r✓::~i :.wC Orw �v �r7 �a: a.a C� r $
S=SB A ✓�iS1 7 vz1 = D as:1 vz= =au �...r
�^�~.."� L LEv `L .�rrf� c :D?r.^.SGar 2 _ �-": 5! v^.:: r.O.._�"'✓�Ei
Z=7MDa7T '.'_"1D SBCD �o�^.� :�.^. v".� =11 azsz-ft
-a :^ L-'_ -47 _- :cadc—d D^. : a —r LS5'a=:)r
rya_ sue:.- sue:, =D s`.c =a_ S =71= cd7 7 c_
rr.CF Svc aw_ •...✓ _Er rP.•_..✓vJ G :.�V; _s zz-_-zpl
� r~P!-• Pry L
o;:
a z l.:. .noo r G .s = D
ate= 1a�:�S c
ss7zsa JA G_.ss:t =D
_. G r i `..�•2 _ r 7 ZZ) r _ Z.Za=D ✓ _--w r� Ga�'..w C rJ S ....+ �✓'Y.� ro
.rC �..'G_ rv✓ n..
'." �G✓ T.^r 7Grr G•C�. G.J�r._G_. �� � , r .. ..- jl� ,
oZcZ5 0' =D 5=cD21'. aDc==7MS ..+-cc. TD -"c••5 c: �2!: `c_ T .
SNQI'

- sT-s aq ?;noes
-uo-sc�a
aii2 ::.•� i :O� ' a^���"`s'� :��v L'" u2 = a
�O . S==a=sms 3q D:T S~
5'.:.'a,r *OO P 'a'L� _5SorD� �� :.altol:+ aC =TmOqs
SPa bv0`'c 1 c�c��DC�D:.2 ./GiP.•"i:S�CD oiaLli'� 3r7Cr2 Cq
s2 ;ans 4o-Tcfa5a� -ua-�«a5a11 a.:R Z.Da=�czd cz 'f.z'assarau
S� `�paua� aq L is =zm sCa-m asa:zz sc7 i Legs
uo-,sca5al, � � � macs ' �a�aaL s T • (' .:�a ' su^� ac : d ' s'-.�aq
uo :+aus-7-c-e-ssa
Saarz ' $1
G./T�irrr VT �a%�G � rr �Gia.�� ♦r..r 3+�w Q Gr•.�e+�ir• �si�ji.''ia T
SGwr.r:r rT5 .raw cT�..= G�5-�:': ✓Gwaiirr7ri.1 ia��o ✓4E S,.O'.�72'� ' � L
'.iGTSl S �+:o:."a�2�2'.�' o•` S2": `�c'�-�2 a�T ..�^-
tponunuo7)
......... ... . . --- ! :
....... ...
......... 7f

/ ,/!Z : a_E -^ _ a_..�T �ZTS
•s .7 -�. � •�• P-s•yj (r.o:.a5v) ssar -fit;
Ls//roi.1-dII S/+'/-17 -A 7 SJP
Q
�✓
.
:�c�! ��oFa_ � -?
= t) �a5� :-e;; �ai+ar�g
e�{fj�a-�ao
-�7/rx
LL-"= ��� = . = s-� .:o-�a_.�2S�o� ra.^.�►� ?::e �-oS i rpo z a - �D o:,- -o
atiLL, ofs w�D�-�� 'man-gz 9-4-4 =:., ; a=anas ssa T =�Zana _ro-s 'e
.a a �2�DS-� aL• aq Ts�.:,. aya.�T �� t ��25�a�� Ps �2 { a:•, } _ • �a�;aC�s
aZ-2 sTL=2 a=o_aq =o :�:.-s.n�❑
a•^� C ; -2 ax-r.^.Baw -L-M Sa-=l--o-
Mai =D =D -D� ZS^PD ZP WOT5A5 a�E�CCS JITE t�:c"7r:..�¢ c�S2M
a.�T _O n T D2-.cD ..� sow a�-rs-3•a a t CT �„ srB=B �::, (aft)
-anoC2 ..+P..a-24 .�•C� Qr; r _ �C'Ci IZC--Gz • • wM S=S-am
..1
a�T "Z 7 a 7_Pri�2i1G�-- �• ✓..-�L `.iv ..Gf�-�.� a.-�. ��ii�
•..�.::?.:�ar^.S a�R ^..raWaLC.'� �� MDL_�_ tL'M :.::'2'
G!/�+.9 �113 0�7' Ni►'J7�J ....� e� � a ash.
:.=r am.:: h :''ice td0 ►�..:. ��,�51 z S u
�.�........,... ... _

GL60J BOYC TTE Sc J G 0�7
L-A000N DFSTGN fEFCK LZSm
1. Copy of 026 and maps if clearing involved.
2. Dam Safety - J
✓ a. Dike over 15 feet to down stream slope and over 10 acre feet
storage to top of dike.
3. Adequacy of storage volumes -
a. designed volume exceeds needs
�-- b. all temporary storage stored above seasonal high watertable
✓ c. include statement from landowner when he requests no sludge
storage
d. minimum 6 feet treatment volume depth
4. Operation & Maintenance Plan (sheet) --
✓ a. begin and end pump -out elevations
5. Location sketch -
a. distances to nearest residence
b. road numbers
v c. north arrow
6. Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENC-34) -
a. distance to nearest stream in event of dike failure
b. distance to nearest public road in event of failure
.� c, topo map showing lagoon location and information to support a&b
7. Waste Utilization Plan -
a. shoo all tracts & field numbers, field acreage, crops
b. signatures of producer & person preparing plan
C. agreement sheet signed by adjoining landowner if needed -
showing tract numbers, field numbers, acres, etc.
d. ASCS maps of fields to be used for effluent disposal
e. soil survey sheets showing all fields
f. check suitability of soils for crops planned
g. include attachment "B" on sampling procedure
8. Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-LNG-538)
L__ a. minimum of three borings on Class IV & V lagoons
`f"b. borings 2.0' below designed bottom of lagoon
location & elevation of borings in relation to grid survey
d. seasonal high watertable

9. Seeding Specifications (lagoon dike and other exposed areas around
buildings)
10. Construction Specifications (sheet) -
a. -address need for cut-off trench
b. address need for sealing with compacted impervious material and
identify anticipated location of such areas
11. Grid Sheet -
✓ a. location & dimensions of lagoon& buildings
TBM location & elevation
C. location of soil borings
d. surface water removal (pipe outlets, etc.)
12. Typical cross-section
•— a, dike elevation & top width
'r b. lagoon bottom elevation
C. side slopes
mod. effluent outlet pipe invert elevation
-re. building pads - elevation & grade
f. cut-off trench (if required)
13. Volume Computations -
tea. excavation
--b. dike fill
c, pad fill
14. Summary Sheet -
—a. design requirements
:mob. excavation volume
tee. fill volumes
`mod. cut -fill ratio
✓e. job class
1.-15. Statement on observation of cultural resources

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner .ycc. �e. County 'T6XrJAJI�
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam__) _3Ft, Length of Flood Pool 306 Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 3 — S- 9 3
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est.
Elevation
Kind of :Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length: Width:
Slope: Land Use
Improvements . Above :Floodwater Above
: Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft. Ft.
%
LU o b c/
Ft.
Ft.
2
3
Describe potential for
loss of life and
damage to existing or �?robable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach /'jQ
„��»,.� �� �, /� _ZT/
a-r�?
e c CY 21 A �t� 7� �7X1—�L,2 _ 0 �%Y6 b P -A sr 6 rr__
r,
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V) (�,/arr ,lam
By
name
title
Concurred By
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date 0 19 —V!3
Date

C; j
Rk
LA;,
ELI -
ELI -

SCS-ENC-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Re.. 5.76 SOIL, CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FMLUER'S NAME w DISTRICT
DATE- `�� COUNTY Soh a
S.C.S. PHOTO SHEET NO. - M111S WORK UNIT
WATERSHFU AREA MEASUREMENTS L R 60610
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES (2V4CS=
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACRES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVAT[Oi_ IST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale P= feet)
Lr.c"td rrferrnce print in cenur line of dam and ldentily an sketch.
/
Q
a
I
I
Y
Li__.. i
_
Ifll
I
In
ELI.
I
SHOW
UFf" lllf
SCALE
BORING NUNIHE:R AND 1 ROV11-E
M:rar "FiJ 1.1f dam -,ire .Ind spiltw"y dr�nn.?f lersf • fhrn Pond'd ar." "Fill 6"..uw Pit bonnys • SITWIare with crrn .ej rnl line,
f IMn 'd on bu,-A mhnr neiusaryl Show -"ter labld rlrwn,mi on durn•sife hunnpf.
- -
1 l J FFfi 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 3iS 19 :GFY Si
-
-
-
L
a
xca
�
—
I
I
o
_
t
4
}iillfS CS h1m) . BY :__�ye_�a__ ..--_ SlCiNA'1�i?R . Yc TITLE 4T s►v�a �� 7 �

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERLD IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION-"T*�,
US A};CLK9SIFICATION
GW-Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s - sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs -very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -Clay mix
si-sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
fsl-fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
I - loam
SM -Silty sand
gl - gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; send -clay mixtures
si-silt
ML- Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
siI -silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
cl-clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl- silty clay loam
MH - Elastic silts
scl -sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic - silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c-clay
k. Suitable material for embankment is available ea 0 No lfndicale WAere localea un th. skal.h an
ra—W s:.rer
REAtARKS: 1 8rJ1� , �-ar�t.� 1 tsa-+.�-P-i----•
c
1��+-�_ taro r Q-Q.t.4 .�P�.+.-•� ��-� 'B-.�.°�- -c.+^.
/�
2. Explain hnsarda requiring special attenLion is design (Seryjye. iprl,W..rvct eec./
�-�a-ie�'� -a [I-fL.a'.e�•�..•r1�j v�� .�v.` �- -p'fti-� D-rU-
f�f�.o-ems
Gl:.lvFItAL I NL.1RK5:
24
25
Gc}
:7 2;
9
30
i it 3'3 33 134 35
3c'
37
3H
3'1 4D
41
42
43
44
4647
48
45
:;+j
w1
fi
--_
--I

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
....--------------------------------------------------------
Clear ing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch -in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.
Cut-off Trench:
---------------
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
-------------
Construction of excavated and earthfill- areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall not be placed
in standing water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. Toprotect against seepa e,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered the -will
be excavated a minimum of on i) fa.o_t-below grade and _backfiIled and
compacted with a suitable material (ie-CL SC CH). Refer to the 50i15
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas Shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction.

LAGOON SUtl!%lARY SHELL & TYPICAL CROSS-SE:CTIOr
sQttled tcp of duw7.Se
Top Width l
/0
1-/0 % Constrluct top of c1w,
k A6a anJ
Fill Yardage: 48?
PAD = 4S/S
i qio �
3
/---_-N�+t�rral ---- nd��_lc`v_____-_-_ -_---__-______
C _ _ --
cut of f se yl
Depth detyrrininA-04
Dopunds on cyt.ii pa,ent .!� aCS _on - si tQ_
Star[ land upplicaCion�-+ - _ Stop -land
_53.3 application
T�luv. 55.8 elev. 53•�
j7 ---'1'�rrllw -- Volkiwo 7 -----_------ ------------
/
Sent
support —
Bottom elev. `WS
5 649
Lagoon size: Length FL445
Trcetment Volume
:S , 1
3
------------------------------------
L,AGaa,.� p
1 ENCH NARK DEciCR I F' !' I L)PJ : NA/ 4-. /n! YPociad Oa (-Z w" ` 8 blu - gIeak At 3
e So-K a a�cn e�� �ai�',P, f 1eV41tior7: SO.�
At &W Jt` L gso..e1_
GENERAL I NF= QRNAT I ON
JOD CLASS: ZQ6.oaJ C.L.Aw u
HAZARD CLASS: `'ate
ANIMAL TYPE & NUMBER: ?48o HEAP
KIND OF OPEKATION: 2jgpoO F,tifsk/N6
NOTE: If construction is not
sL•.:arted within onu yo ar, thi
plan is not valid until ro-
ovalu;tino of flood plain for
nfety hazard is goon. ---
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL WASTE
(SINGLE STAGE)
13DY&TTE
To E.LeltTay CGUHTY
(jrQRT,y CrdRo c�.� STATE
U. S. DEPAR T NENT OF iiX I CUL. T URC
SD I L CONCiERVAT I ON CFtV I CE: i
I)L.:) I CNL'.E) f�'r : _�wa,...11t �fru�►;«..---- - !
TITLE:

SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDiED: AApox. rZ•p ACRES
USE THE SEED -MIXTURE INDICATED:
J,ta LBS. FESCUE GRASS G 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVENBER 30
J .2-o LDS. ' PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS C 60 LBS. /ACRE
(SEE FOOT140TE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO ,TUNE 'fO
16 LES. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS O A LES./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO DULY 31
(moo LBS. RYE GRAIN C 3W LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR; FESCUE)
o LBS. RYE GRASS L 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMDER 1 TO MARCH 30
LES.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
a oaa LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
�F TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (? TONS/ACRE)
a.00 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 DALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISI: TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOGTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRES SEEDfjED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR ECUIPrIENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER; TO ESTABLISH THAN CONNON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT S
LbS. /ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
-5-c-e- glorj_

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions,flush ing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment 8)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion SS.N as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 53.3 or before fluid depth is
less than b feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

Owners
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
name--: % 0 County:
i
Mail Address-:
Type of production unit----: d21/$D -Fee'lr, % Finlshi�
Type of waste faci;lity------•—L11.c�era.h;� rje�¢im,n ,�cluoo-o-�!__
.. 1.J
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the`waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
creeds of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize -the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
animals x J tons waste/animal/yr= # tons
total waste

Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
a.3
animals x_ lbs. N/animal/year = 5701 lbs./yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield l.bs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Per Ac. Used Apply
OEM
M-P.M.0
W" �_
mmmmmmmm�
Narrative of Operation:
c�= weCfCory�d�k� It erTd u,
jyf U- A.A k-'.r.
Total
Available Nitrogen 67<24
Surplus Or Deficit
Pc e'r .5_t a berrJei d�/�c: ilr co-aa-- -, // C!.I J H
Purn�7A;os�5it 0_#orc4~.)�� �0. ��C e CdreS/1a iet,"L�V�nS7
ari Toga /S A< A/�nrn�c .S.)„ IN/, c'.u. �d r,,4 %tT we
relee
�yggrn, Wn�'. Yeff`/�t. i,Y( �J f G77g� i/ �7CYfpci�e',)
T7Zi'�JJ 9S_JtY1.)/,r %[ht7', 4'� aSFs'.�2/='f/._4f,nc! t-arrsrc/1
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the ition�plication rate prior to applying
waste. e� 9-z�-Y3
Prepared by:
Name Title Date
Concurred in by:
Pr6ducer Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
9

m

ATTACHMENT B
:l ' .i
Agri -Waste Manageme.nt
Biological and'Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING,- ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot:Manure -
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 Ibs of manure -from under .the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. .Liquid -Manure Slurry _
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2' nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit.floor.
b. Seal upper end -of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump. or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsar-ples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
1 of 3

ATTACHMENT S
2 o€,_3
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflou.;pipe-',
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small -bottle (1/2 pint or less)'on end -of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within 1' of, liquid surface.
e. Empty. into a plastic bucket-, repeat about 5-times-around -r
lagoon, mix,.and add 3/4-pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. ,Sroiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface -in -each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g.. if 201 of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c..At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about-2-3 lbs litter to a'nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallori freezer bag and seal..
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5-locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2.3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

ATTACILMENT B
3 of 3
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
- D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. AFL Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
L. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca, Mg. Na,
S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Mo. Cd, Ni, Pb
Prc

f '►

� `�
Q n�1 ) � �c, p �
?�(] ��(�.tJ7r� 'n'� �L7Jf , � f� , �(a-sL�2/YL.2� G�K� -1- � 0 ' � -`�./ .
r ��g5
t

/ - I rf-v� v
ly
! b�Y Tt
. b �
Oc
4 }

Operator:GLEN 80YETTE County: JOHNSTON Date: 0u/12/93
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 1200.0 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs. =
0 lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs. =
0 lbs
2480 head (finishing only) x 135 lbs. -
34800 lbs
0 sop,s (farrow to wean) 433 lbs. _
0 lbs
0 head (wears to feeder) x 30 lbs. =
0 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) _
3.4BOO lbs
?. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 334300 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb.
SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. SSLW= 1 CF/1b. SSLW
Volume =-y34830 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic -feet 44^0 GIuUaje 4eCQuft'3TG7D
NG 5LUp6j.
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 510.0 feet q .Inside top width
140.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 57.5 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside
lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 56.5
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 45.5 feat
Seasonal nigh water table elevation 0.0 feet
Total design volume Lasing pr i smoi dal formula
SS/END! SS/END? SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE? LENGTH WIDTH
DEPTH
= . r0 _ . 0 -..0 0 504.0 134.
11.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
504.0 134.0
AREA OF DOT T iOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
4'8. 0 68. 0
b75-fie . 0 ( AREA OF TOP)
29784.o (AREA OF BOTTOM)
;AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH -k. 4
471.0 101.0 1902254. O ( AREA OF I`] I L',Sf= CT : 0'j\j * 4,
CU. FT. C-AREA TOE' + (4*ARE.A MIDS-E :TION) + AREA BLOTTON]
v%5- .0 lc0284.0 1.S
VCLU"C OF L «��f�:`! f; 1 7f?T�L rt ,�: t�ttf L _ 1 l !wE' Ew = _,2'.'2. 4 CL-''_ FT .

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE RE—QU I RED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
.Length * Width
510, 0 140,0 71400.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 71400.0 square feet
Design ,temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste prodLtced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0. 00 1376
Vol. Lime = �. 4@00 Lts. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day 180 days
Volume = 81.760 Cubic feet
5D. Vol itme Of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flesh system. Flash systems that recirculate
the lagoon water G,re acccunted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons: day 160 days storage/7. 48 gallons
Per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C . Volume of rain -fall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall -- 7. D inches
yes
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / I'-" inches per font
J:alr_ma = 41650.0 Cubic feet

;D. Volume of 275 year - 24 hour storm
Volume -= 6.e inches / 12 inches per -foot * DA
Volume = 40460.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TF_MFORARY STORAGE
5A. 81760 cubic feet
5B. 0 tunic feet
5C. 41650 cubic feet
5D. 40460 cubic feet
TOTAL 163870 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 498670 cubic feet
Totaa design volume avail. 5,7274 cubic feet
Fein. ray. treatment volume Pius slUdge accLumu1 tiOn ''7,49 0 _--ubic =eet
AL el ev. 53. ? feet : Volume is =:30 -!.�S Cubic feet (end pumpl rig
Total design volume less 5yr-24hr storm i s 4E6e1 4 cubic feet
At elev. 55.5 feet ; `Ioi.Lcme 4r-0`FT.' cL;bic feet (start PUmp;nC)
TT Seasonal x.i : h /�water at aka) I e elevation y-� 0.0 feet
S-I�� A:=hi : V ii.4,^A- Cx)aM^'+- C. �'!�"�'i�CU BY: � �1
DATE.3 IaATE:
Cdr7TE:: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN

------------
Tf � Jl • -Vl ! � � � v
Qom; ar.s
l
1 r- G)
`. -
)T-�y
1' � z 1) S
1' f
b°1-S
9 8 -.f z'rs o r r �L f E z r €) TT
\5-11h r1 l �') �Ys. tit I
f"f8z �, a rr
-ems •� S o /

, - i
Z, >F 0 "I-
—f-, --) �
Ll e-2117�1

f
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONT NUMBERS
DWQ 919- 571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-989-5050
SWCDP 919- 989-5381
NRCV919- 989-5381
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. -
You should make every effort to ensure that this Ices not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employeesat _ the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. add soil to term to increase elevation of iam.
b . Pump wastes to fields at an ac: eptahle came.
_e.
C. Stop all `lows to the lagoon immedia el .
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering _;coon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application..
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) z^az
caused the runoff.
E. Evaluate the application rates for tAe fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-actiom
include:
a. Stop recycle Dump.
. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate furl er d?scAarge.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals, wrap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the ccnditicn of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for wham
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage? -
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the 7ctential to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain even cause the spill tc reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in clanger (either cn cr off
of the property)?
h. How :such reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. Dur_mq ,normal business ..curs, cal_ ycur IN,
(Division of frVacer Qua__ reg cna_ ice ;
919- - Ater hcurs, emergency number: ----
. 3 .. -- - " 2 . Your Chong call shoulder include: 'i cur
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill Leaves property or enters surface [paters,
call local EMS Phone number 9L9-989- 5050.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989--5380, local S co
office phone number 919-989-5381, and local MRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage. `
a �s9 1JA;Y q�
a. Contractors Name: /?%, Ni e1_r
b. Contractors Address:
C. Contractors Phone: - 5 -
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a . Na-Lie
b. ?None: 919 989-5381
7: Implement procedures as advised
assistance agencies to rectify
system, and reassess the waste
problems with release of wastes
_leuaer Wean, w n[ ai rrr, qnc; o� en.,xcx
by DWQ and technical
the damage, repair the
management plan to keep
from happening again.

Swine Farm Waste Management oflor Confrol Cheddist
LIM 1 4
--- - —
HNIP!i fit Millilldze Odill.
SIIL specifit:
c 111(ichiclitill
and comitiall sense
Amm-il blkl}' !.MfAfl:', -.—dilly
II1MIIIrC-Ci1VC(Cd illlillLilk
P" Dry 11flols
-
V10 malillic-CtIvErud fillols
FL;r Slimed I'loors;
P/Willcrcls localell nVer 5lotied Hollis;
Ps"'Feeders at high cnit ofsolid floors;
r'll/Scrape inamirt; boil(hip fimil, floors;
ventilalioll ((I[. ill-ying
—1w-111-111C —FAA-11(uv—;Il —fllish'
il.1il 1.11'.
114-
by pi—[1cclial-ge,
fl 11111cl►flool. ventilislioll
W11111.ili'm 4.161 1 lam
kii
wa�llilmvli 114"Mut'll rmllps ol'allimills;
A Fecil aflilijivcj;
rl FE-1.114:4 c(sv':I'i;
I ILI .11 1.11.1
Al!ll.ohm (Ificcycicil lagooil
FlIvAI hill; CA Ivt Re jl"—
F] l:x1c-ml fill line; in iwai himmit oftinll,s wills
RlAr cl)4�y-
.11 Aill
A gil;ll 34111 dill ing
fl(IfIl lltIS11 wish IIIIdL:J tlt)1)1' VJ-11 I Fik'Zill,
c 14 017 .4
Pil
I:t:ycicd ill"mm
Iccliml-'e, IIL,;Il 1111114)111 4411i15
hiplid while pits ale fillip!;
1V1111 umi-silillilit v1:11i.;
411 111 L I L +11111 III .
I q Mt vi*yAlWi;
A1,11 It ' - I 1,&v, mk:i I I 191)(1, il,tl-c 'I

- inUr/'t: - --- ru"Se IlNU% In i4'1i111111& is'
SheSI1Lrlflc i'1'i1LllCl'S
I:ull tll lll.linlulll:, ;11 - -. Al;llaluul fhlrllll; wi151CLviYIL'f t-I i_xtcmi IIiSCllail;l: Ilnitll of Ililles until rncalll
(.11;11un cunVeyilm lal;nllll llllrllll Icvcl
1 ;,I.111111 :ILI IA1 c�, VISIa[Ill Lils Cllils5lf5115, limper lagoon liquid L'ilhilchy;
1
• Iliolol;ical mixing; �Corrccl lagoon shmill llrouthlres;
• A(;ilalion Ff htillilulnn surface arcil-In-VUI1111le ralin-
Illil;,lu11+, •,l,llnl"L't
nurrll:;
%11.11.r. IJA, 11Y I„ OII
:.1I$ 1.11 1.
11, III I111; I,,1 .III :.1111,11 <
LI,Innl1: :.Ilul;� 1,1 :,L1111,c
11111 II\ 1 I1.11 11,.11 IIII
.lu,ly I I :.III.Il;1: 1,n IL I.I
Mint I 1::.
111:.,.1 �nlun.rl ,II .I„I'..11
1111 ,
f� Adininuun agilalinn wllcn I1n111ping; '
f7 fvlechiniical aerallfui; N�/11
n k'roveri biological illldiiivcs/1--/W
• I llgll llre;iule al;ilalion; - f�r Illil;ale on Illy days LVltll lilllc or no Lvilld; —
• ��llllll drill [�Millilllnnl fecnlnllictilled flllerating Ilressltre;
pt/I'nnlll illIA-C near lalinnn lielnirl surface;
fl I`lunll from second-stagc hll;nnn 1/5
• I'lutiitl lnit phial cl�cnnlln,sili+ul; Cl 111110111 or nlitlll-vr.l loiulinl;;
• I'lixinl; while tilling., rl Tilnl. covets;
• AgiluliIli when cntll[ying n Ilasill sill lar.c mall nfsrllids;
fl 1'rovi.�ll Ilioingical adllilives or oxillinlls
- I'1nli;ll rrll�111171itk+11:41IIIYIIUSItlnll; ---.[� lixll:ncl <Irillllrlihe nlllll-ES III11lCInL'itlll lilhll�r7`�-
- r+lixinl; LvLilc: tilling; Il:vla;
• Al;ilatiun when cr11111yiug i-1 Itenulvc seined solids regularly
• AI;Hation wilco slllciuling; - f-j- .`,oil injcl lion nCslnlrY/slull(;I: �--- ----
r
1 nlauL: ga, mumunls F1 ty"ll resich1;11 mmnule lion" "now �111cr I '*
• \rn111{I11. I;.IS I:R1.ismirts 1Vlllll:
111 gull;
• 1 '.II I:;ISi I l 1: ctMilllly111o1i
• (",ul:ilr.s 11cl-unlllll,l{Inu - -
• Inl:lnoll11a1: rnnlln+,lion
.11 1
(I 1'rnvr.11 Ilinrnl;il::ll alllli[Ivcs nr uxl<EanL: /"
..._ - .. ------__ _._. ..............
fl Soil injl:clion ufslull��I,lulll,la
�1 'inir illcnrllcilalinn wilhin 48 ills.;
1'1 ' 1111:a1! in Il1in uuilmill "dyers for lallid dryiul;;
f� 1'IUVCn lYiuln(;ir.ill ;ulliirivla nr nxillalll:i //Y
-- r�oru;I" chsrsusilion of I:;IrY:;issla--- J �
rl I:unyYllae r.uv/:lilll; of L:ul:a:i:ila in hull:"" I111::;
CI I'roru:l" Itic;IIil,llkot1Sltnlait Ill of"disposal ])it!;
rl '�1:1-n1111:41)' %t.111. lilt, iI':IS ,�(
.':L11 II I i1,� • nll�1 I 11, I'+•+l,, l'.11.1: •I

A
-I-I.ulul.:ll,u'1-I:.I.+uln .
I II11,11.. Iu,I�I�. li�,ul I,iinl
.IL I'C))
CHIISL
• impmlicr Ilrainill;c;
hlwiu11iitI IIcciiImluIsiIiltit ul
ul I;iIn1L 1liillm
�.. "I'Ilnily niililllilincll acccss Iniills
1ih11's la hlinimlxc odor
�IrilllC Mill IMOSU11W SOCII 1I1i11 LVWVI— III'i1111S
a+wry hom 1:11:ililics
I'illill accv5s wild Illillillcllillicu
silt specific 11raclices
Allllillull.il hilminii1111ii AVi111i1I1k FIF0111
4Sivinc f.l,unnu I,Lulal;.:nlcnl ; W-16 1 I61lc111M1' I'ilckcl 14CSI1, Cnnnly lix(erlsinn Culler
I'clidlit li.ul F.ilinl l'IIIcliliill ( III11r S011ICCS aocl I(Cnri.-dics ; 1'.IIA li I:acl S11ect NCSI1 - 11A1i
:�1vull 1'i.i.iu..11uu f ,icilily f•liuuuc Manill;cnlCIW Pil Itccllilrgc - I.ilgiMn Ticalmeul ; 1;-BA1: l'_ 128-88 NCSII - BA
';wine 1'1rl.Jllcliuu l al:ilily hliiulllc h1allagcnienl: 011clelfloor Fillsh - higoun'hemllicnl ; HlAk 12',)-88 NCSI1 - BAli
I q:,o li I icsil,n iui.l Lliuull;cnrcnt fur IJVCSI11Ch hlanure' ICiIInlcnl and Stnrill;c ; Ii11Ali 103-83 NCSII - BAli
l'.Ililn.11i.)u of 1.1,u1111.:.uiui kk,ik Icwaft:l Alllllicmiun I:clllilinicnl ; L•IIAI: 1'iici Slwct FIC511 BA1.
+'Old uLill cnl,+ i.1..1, Iluui IhijillilIgs ; I'll l-33 NCSU - swiltc Iatellsinll
I:llviiluuul_ulill :1 �ul,ciirc I'lul;rilm ; 1ll'I'C: hlilliti ai NC I'nik h-od leers Assoc
i 11i[luu I.sl (•1,III ,I;klil; ( )d0i ; it IC11u.1 111111 111C S WiliC 011111TUS1: FilicC NCSI1 Agii Commimicalinns
Itiliuuuc kh1ingl:11h.-III: OIInIS unll 1:lies ; IT(1107, I'MS I'nlifiacnl:e I'rnc{:cclings Hnrilla I'nnpefalive I.xlclisino
A1,1i it I I..•.. , i � I „ I I I I')'+I., I',II,,_ )

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
�'11111 cv i11115 L' JIMPs 111 Cooll-111 hisc L'IS SIIL Slocclffc: t'ractivVS
-----�--- - - - -�— Lir]uid Systems--
1111411 CIIuttcl s 4D ACCUMulatioa of solids [Nosh system is designed anti operated / I
sufficiently to remove accunullaled solids from , f e e4dV e
Putters as designed.
! it
bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
1.az4,uus and fits Cruslul Solids _ Maintain lagoons, scltling basins awl pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crasling of solids to a depllt of no more than 6 -
S inches over more than 30% of surface.
—F xCessive vl gctalive 0 Decaying vegoation Maintain vegelative control along hanks of
c irtl,rth lagoons and Other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
Anng water's edge on impomldntenl's perimeter. 1
- - - Dry Systems
I 1 :1; -- F1 ul S11i1lclge n Design, o1wrate suit] 11wiWain feed systems (e.g.,
bankers and troughs) to minimize the
accunudatinn of decaying wastage.
n Clean up spillage nn a romine basis (c.C.. 7 - 10
day i[IICI'Vill (1npin]; summer, 1 S-30 clay interval
daring winter).
Accllnudations of feed rcsichics 0 Iteduce moislare accnmOlalion wilhin and
around irnnledimle perimeter of lined slorage
areas by irlsutiuf; drainagt: away f-EIIII site
and/or providing adetlumte conlainnlenl
covered bin for brewer's grain mud similar high
moisture grain prodacls).
n Inspect fir and remove or break Lip accuintihoed
solids in 17ltcr strips around Iced storage as
needed.
ilnlK' - Tlot'c fiber 11, 096, Page

5uurcc Cuusc I3MPs to Control Insecls. - — -- - , .— --
Aniutal I1r�lrlin Arcas Site Specific ! iAche"
6 Acanuulations of anintnl wastes ❑ Eliminate low arras that Ira moishtre I
Ivry Maruue Ilurulling
sysicurs
and feed wastage
• Accumulations of aninurl wastes
p a nob
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
17 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accurnnlated solids as
needed),
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; I5-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
n Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
n Inspect fir and remove or break tip accumntill cc)
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
— manure handling areas as needed.
For 11141rc inlirrnf:Hion contact the Cooperative Exlension Service, neparlmew of Entomology, Box 7613, Norlh Carolina Sine University,
IhIcigh, NC. 2769.i-7613.
AKIN: - tlnvcitiber 11, 19(.J6. Page 2

Mortality ilyianazement -Methods
(check which rnethcd(s) are being impiemented)
Burial three fee: beneach the surface of the Around within ?— hours alter
knowledsP of the death. The bu.la1 mast be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream orpubiic body of eater. T
�ende:ina at arendering plant Iicensed under G.S. 106-163.7
zi Complete incineration
Z.' In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit of a size and desi-n
approved by the Departrne.^.t of Agriculture
Anv meshed whicin in the professional opinion of the State Vere:inarian would
make possible the salvage crrt paof a dead anlmai's vaiue v.-Ithcut endanger nsz
human or animal health. (W.-Inen approval of rh e Stare Veterinarian must be
attac,ed)

Nr
As;
I j
'00
jaio At
T7 . j .1. -.4 e � -� i 1., -1 - I�L� - - - -, r -- - V�
. 4�� W
I
0