510126_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 24, 1997
William Daniel Barefoot
W. Daniel Barefoot Farm
391 Tart Tn Rd
Dunn NC 28334
Subject:
Dear William Daniel Barefoot:
Removal of Registration
Facility Number 51-126
Johnston County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $ 10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poul with a li uid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
_-pR
cc: aleigh W.ateraQtiality Regional,Office
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James -B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Danicl Barefoot
391 Tart Town Road
Dunn, North Carolina 28334
Dear Mr. Barefoot:
�f
NCDENR
NQRTM CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OW
ENVIRONMENT ANo N/QURAL RresouRCEB
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 29, 1997
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-126
Daniel Barefoot Farm
Johnston County
On October 14, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection
of the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine compliance Nvith the
State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not discharging wastewater into waters of the State
and that the waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the inspection the facility was
found to be in compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you arc required to have an approved
animal wastes managementlean by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical
specialist ora professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste
management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District officc.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely,
J dy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%pdst-consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection
f!
Time of Inspection 1 30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: `-mastered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review Z.
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not fO�perationa1l Date Last OLperated:..................................»......».......»...............»»........................»»..................................................
Farm Name: ...................0ha!-!...»t .. (...............;�... re........ � ........1..... . ....... County:...........»alP ^�.£ r !I?................... ».........»....» ...
LandOwner Name-. .1L.is..... ).......... ......nc 6�vf......................................, Phone No: ...................................... _...............................................
Facility Conctact: Ll^r' r to Title:.......... P' ' Vit ................. Phone No:....».....L[»~ . .
..................».................... .............................. ...............
Mailing Address:.) R.....»_Tv:. ......... P...-2..._......64 ............ ...... ».»...............
......... ..d✓.li-tAJ.....................................»............... .. 33.f.......
Onsite Representative: ....U�K^ikL.......»y� r fi......................................... Integrator:........ !,
.»................»........................»...............».
Certified Operator: .................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
....................................... ................................................... _.......................................................................................................................... F ...... ...... .......... .. ......... ..
».....A SAW t................�.............3Q r..............%'?. .......... °,�r�v........1!..-....................................................................................................
Latitude �• �' (��" Longitude �• �' �"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
moo'
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2Wo—
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
2-1�0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
EI -Ko'
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
Lld'1�'o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
041! o
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

11
Facility Number: p —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
t2. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ar�o
Pilk ❑ Yes
❑I No
❑ Yes
2.1 o
❑ Yes 9<0--
Structure
oStructure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes <0
es ❑ No
❑ Yes 2<
15. Crop type A S j? !X.4�1t s...................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
0ONo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of.adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
+� No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
eNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[3'N' o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
O"No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
B-50—
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? e4*-
1*- ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerllnspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130/97

SWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review rc
E[] DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
MRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of MV ) in�Lmtion O Follow-up of DS«'C review O Other �
Date of Inspection C
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1..25 for 'l hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
r
© Not Operational I Date Last operated:„,..51w5 6-il- T`5 6�R�
„ „ ...........`•„5..,•.......... ...... .t'
Farm Name:............................................................................................................................... Collttty:
- J-()� N `..` -'-k' -`` ,......}........'.
........
Owner
....
..
owner Name i 7),
................................................................I�onc \o ...... ..l..;......
4
FacilityContact: ............................................................................. Title:.....................................,................,........ Pho
Mailing Address: ...................... .......... .....
.. ................
uu 2 I M7 ; D 1
f %�j4 n 7 ()i 1f R I7dl Fff N AF I(1R� 5� orrinr f
Onsite Representative: ..... .....%....,..,...............L��T..14. �. Inte rater:....................,...?.... ...- -{.
Certified Operator: .................................................. .............................. Operator Certification Numher:.................
Location of Farm:
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... _
Latitude 4 46 Longitude 6 61
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischar-e is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observer], did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ).
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/ improvement?
❑ Yes �lNo
❑ Yes !LI No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes
P.1 ry
P.
C3 Yes
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ Yes
E'0*0
Continued on back

r'j Facility Number: / — Z.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Cl Yes
j(No
4No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
{ "Yes
/
8, Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
dNo
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
IL] No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure..Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
............. ................. ..... .............. ,..............,..I... ...............,. ..................... ........... ,............... ....... ..... .......................
............... ................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
�No
l l . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
PPO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application`?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 6.. .............................
../ ............................................................................................................
............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
El Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
)gNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
EPNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
P(No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
al C� trc.�C Sce q,� �- bcLfCa.► Ot/�e lGtz}(S
`7_ ��� �o-� i AA }D P u /n p 1 Ps YAK � $ 7-� I -A&
� 55 P, � 5EAjQ Ck,45i5 t vr,d
v /--/6 T G 6-r /5*C,c 0,04/e C3`G .
P/ tl Vr,�.(J,4rr C�vl1 r r `i _ ___
Reviewer/Inspector Name
<�<
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality iectioiz, Facility Assessment Unit 4130197