510106_PERMIT FILE_20171231

011I aw 0 'a3ag
t 5 + DivlsIon of Water Re ��ce"s
�acility�Num$er �3t 'I�`1C,J Division ooil and Water Conservation.
to Other,Agepcy
type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review aStructure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint W Follow-up 0 Referral 9Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
xxw
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �� County: Qrl Region: R� _
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Y Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: f Integrator: P('&�(�{0
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
.Design
Current
f
€1,=� tJ1
Design Current
�IINltta>�
1RF
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity P�o"p.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
V1xe LNWldu€ IIII iE ,tl1
id' iti tk4fl itlL,➢
oh'ifffflomf[ r
WWI
!P#fli €$
iflir� I€€ 117rrv�4
Wean to Finish
iry Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
iry Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
n ['oult .
CafaciG r
Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
!'
Turkeys
Other
"
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
o-xu,xya;amrvsp(sixxwna.�bim.w➢€sxix€i€1€ntii�gruYs%knrtr;}i3ini�frtkxrm�V
a€aka€€nsagx[ixiErikx�IRt{'txlxVYe�imwi€i€€€r€€uxxuy�uw[ia}amfcgiEslxa{grYTllMvvxitx
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

lFacility Number: 5' - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? � Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes JR1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: —
Designed Freeboard (in): r0j
Observed Freeboard (in): 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes t�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [5D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
D NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
' Z NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
n NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D No
❑ NA
ff�/NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
g NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
U NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EZ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
]� No
❑ NA
D NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[:]No
[;'NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Gacili Number: El Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA U NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA M NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure (phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Dg NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to 4perly dispo a of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time I. the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 4a' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, con' 1 1. 'ty representative immediately.
30. Did the faci
permit?
31. Do subsurfaaceti�ti
❑ Akica iF
32. Were any additii
33. Did the Reviewc
34. Does the facility
nal Office of emergency situations as required by the
oWms, over -application)
the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
1 to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
low -up visit by the same agency?
S-� <Wl cheek a%- Hvm cA(,e, Fob,
! nlkm HJP—nH CZS soil 0([ its out, Puifddown abo�i y 1
ra� �1 ?Q� �rmMf � ,� 0�` ion► fir; U�` � 5
Good_c\mr h alt�
` &Xrl, d\p Wotkc -�fk Ct)/- l5 BcrNick
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes (YC4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes CgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
CS No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
®No
❑NA
❑NE
0 Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4otv4 yd1, y, s fray
11(hl'1 sod►,,_ nfiqya)i� day,
Phone: qjq—Vl `qr 3 y
Date: J 3L�'
45
21412

'd3 iI d SI
"Division of Water Resources
Ili Hi Division of Sail and Water Conservation
Q 1 ther Agency
Type of Visit: 0<4mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: GLito—utine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: h Arrival Time: i' Departure Time: - ; f County., .LA� S Region: `),
Farm Name: 11-1nv% 0-i s1 v r­� Owner Email:
Owner Name: ::5 6 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C-u,-113 l a u� + : `�� Title: Phone:
t�
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ) -T�r „� �� ey�L-i
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator: L Sly
Certification Number: zs0
Certification Nugb"J.ept of F.nvironInent"' Quality
Longitude: MAY i P. 7.3 --
Raleigh Regional Office
Desiign Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop . Wet Poultry Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
.3 6
y 7ZO Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design C*urrent
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Uther
Other
Discharges and Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[D-NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
[D i�A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[3"go
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑'lNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: v iJ
Waste,Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
��
E �''c
L❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[:]Yes
0 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑- o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
En —No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[7rNo
O NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[✓] No
❑ NA
0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 tbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): E t It14- —
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [D_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA D NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [D-W ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [D go ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L71`'° ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes 2'1Vo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [/] N
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes I �J No
❑ NA ❑'NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - 7 C) G jDate of Inspection: ZV JrVej
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M-N-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E]-Ko— ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
�. o, ,,6t 7
,:�,q. q1 o -- 31 T-- 6 � s
❑ Yes F7[,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ea -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gal o D NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
D'FIo
❑ Yes
[3-90
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Ll'k) Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

VK5
, � Division of�Watcr Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Sosland Water Conservation
® Other Agency
Type of Visit: Co lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Al
Date of Visit: Arrival Timerr^r� -
Departure Time: Coun Region:
'U�_
Farm Name: O�r�C �Gv I� �(""- Owner Email: (�
Owner Name: _ �9 �l►'l & ( 1'j O trot;, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
w
;�.
oQ.
Phone:
Integrator: CD
n_
Certified Operator: q �-
p Y y 1t Certification Number: C / So
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
mo, wiey( Title:
q
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Current
Design
Current
ffign
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry ity Pop.
Cattle Capacity
Popp
Wean to Finish
H
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
I t)
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design C►urrent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
1)r, P,oultr, Ca acit P,v
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
-Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[�A
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
D No
[rNNA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ofthe State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (Il'yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Er o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
El Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: v4 1-7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EEro ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [r]<A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
I! No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[Y] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
f
ZINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[2]-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[] <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [;],No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [jjlNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes Y0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. [)id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0200Po
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Io
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
t
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 51-'Po
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:�,No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, Freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/lnspector Signatw
Page 3 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [311�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ ""No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2141 015

b 1 KS TVJ
3411
e' 1 a
r. A
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 10 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: . Arrival Time: Departure Time: ; County: Region:
Farm Name: i^o(t>7 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Q'y �(n�`i Phone:
Mailing Address: rT
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: pf ejf ale_
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: - Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Finish Layer
Design
Cattle Capacity
DairyCow
Current
Pop.
Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Finish
DairyHeifer
Wean
PFarrow
DE�]
esign Current
Dry Poultr, Ca aci Pao
La ers
D Cow
Feeder
Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
jr
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
000$ t e
Other
Turke s
ITurkey Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection. 'I[GAI
= Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
5' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
rl�YNE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
15�NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
gNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EQ-NE
R_eauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
12 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste 'transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: -IDA Date of Inspection: fl-3 101, 100 f
14. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA aNE
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes CyrNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations:or any other. comments.
Use drawings of facility to better"explain situation`s (use additiondl' ages'as necessary)`
S r�1v�� �aluxh" f1
7
.y
Reviewer/Inspector [Name: g umy J(,itN L—I E u� Phone: 11 r ft I1fd0- t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %Date: /(� 0
Page 3 of 3 T 21412014

Division OW, Resources
Facility Number 51 - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: -�Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit; Arrival Time: j�� Departure Time; County: i3 �t Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:ij"1 0. - 7 trl
Owner Name: o Phone:
Mailing Address: AR 2 5 203I•�
Physical Address: NC nFbIR i?eintnh pj;a,_r_i Affirm
f
Facility Contact: t` � S It t tW Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design C►urrent
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Pouitry
Finish La er
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
G•attle Capacity Pop.
Dai Cow
Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Cal
Finish
Dai Heifer
Wean
Feeder
Finish
WBoars
Dr, I;oult ,
La ers
Design Current
Ca aci P,o
D Cow
Non-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
ITurkeys
Othe
01 Other 10ther
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
urkey Poults
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ YesGalq"o❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No ❑" AlA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [2-NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[]'FTA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

,t
. Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [g_Nv--❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q_ A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
r �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes G'i off❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes []3-die, ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes � ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes [3-Ne- ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes [3-NV'_ ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Ef-lq�-
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[]r-Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[3--info
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[2-M
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[3'VU
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps [:)Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record kceping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 2]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

acili Number: - Date of Ins ection: �&j r ig
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon -
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: I
21412011

a 1flnlec nlah tv n17)�.Cel+t'1)r►�_s sec- fl'
Type of Visit: A Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
10
Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time,, Departure Time: County: ja_1k)r4egionz�22 d
Farm Name::�� ('�' h0 C (4 C?�j Fay m Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: } re_"g
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator: l (`�5+(IL (y �-
Certification Number: a -
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ YesoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes JT No �f
❑ Yes
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 4!1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ,L3-go
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes';2-110
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 1=-,-JrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes fff'Ro
[DNA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes/ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes,,dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 0 t'3 CoLLo
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes of No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes P7—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ;]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [71'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J�f No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall [] Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 o
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [To
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
[]NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. D' t�e fa ili fail to calibrate waste a placation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is t e facZit6ut o�campli'a c'e(gi p r �ntlitihns related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. r } S ` `d. H (07 a
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first Urvey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: r,
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pen -nit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments,(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
a VIS 'C' c
u-c9- ire_LL,-LL_) 3 oo o ,. c .a g-
ra-35,5 3707a�
oL.c.,"
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
t� [� Phone: // / / /y
Date:
1412011

�i
(Type of Visit: SD Q Compliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
S(JRj
Reason for Visit: outine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other Q Denied'Access I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: -Vj) r,� Region:
Farm Name: �e� �tQ ho C h 0\Q FC1tr rn Owner Email:
Owner Name: �_ aC.� , f f\} 0 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: -ae -(-e-V T h ©r r)4,? td
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 9 LI 9-15 d
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Weto Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr.. P,ouItr� C►_a aci. P,o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Dischar es and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes [�No
[:]Yes 6dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

IF7ac fljty4Number: - Date of Inspection:, --
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
a. Ifyes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) r
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes LZ"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): 'Q�5l 3 QCA 0,,Q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes -11,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
F&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
J6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? Ifyes, check
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspection ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YesVNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili .Number: -10 VL1 Date of Inspection:
f tb facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permii conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
[] Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5;1
the appropriate box(es) below. to -1 9- 1 1
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes]
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES,answers and/or any additional recommendations or any:other,comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
4 4 R t_-[
3 3 21)
-a3-1a. 131(, a.Go
S A q ass —1 a` Lxnv--Q,
cakibcIa- Con')
C It
sec � °Z ` t s
aA
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �� ? 7 %l 70�-.3tl
Date: ��QQ
21412011

I
W
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: O County:&O a _c,& J Regioni!?-9, U
Farm Name: ��� Le T hy � h -� 0 rU 'FCk Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:1YL9�9�
cA 918- 59y_0a19
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Co r 11,6 llaC uU CC , � Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
I
Design
Wet Poultry Capacity
11-ayer
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
llesign
Dr, P,auIt , C►.a aci
Layers
C+urrent
P,o P.
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[—]Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

It
Facilit Number: - Date of ]inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes W'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes FfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes in"Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes J!j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste A��lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes L2'No [] NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ;ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ;3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
oe
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �10
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes A�171No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes jrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

_ e
Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
2Nst
he 'lity fail o calibrate waste a �ication equipmen# as re uired b the permit? ❑Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2 facility out of co pliance with permit con ittons related to sludge`? If yes check ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. a'l 3 P = 5 0 ' S
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes 2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes. 2fNo ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
�No ❑NA ❑NE
XN]o ❑ NA ❑ NE
�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Cotntnents (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or -any additiotiallrecoifiilnendatlons or any;other cuinmt*nfs: ;:
Use;drawines of facility"to better explain situations {use additiunat pales its necessary) 6 ; ; ° 7, `� , x:w' . ,,; k? ; g! t ,
WL U
Wit'&�j-u-C
(,rt, nr`"ef
16 UA 4 c.&-rd E d N ao 13
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 0 ? / -
Date: —
21412011

15-n*eot VS 51as1
t
Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I
W_
Date of Visit: Arrival Tim t' Departure Time: unty Avi S % 11 Region:
Farm Name: T e- 4r Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ai c S g CttltVLr Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: pf"'ev7sm'.-e—
Certified Operator: :N p !L\1 ien Certification Number: ly ( 4 2' `-'a
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
°Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D , P;oultra
C+a aci
P.o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Cg-W- ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes [:]No r7LNA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [—]No ' ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑-11A
❑ NE
[:]Yes
L 1 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili 'Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[g?ifo
0 NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[ [. A
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 1 q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[�t<
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[ 01l o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[ rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
f7f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 6 e tw_u.4 S G
ff-
13. Soil Type(s): `� _ 0 G
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes [J No
❑ Yes C3 No
❑ Yes �10
[:]Yes ❑ No
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes @'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili w Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes g3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2,11o7 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes CjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [;3�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other;
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes %[ rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [!j'No
❑ Yes [3io
[:]Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
C"tY'r" c0 ( 9 — I3—ref
1
5{ _ I-71D -IS e -- 'S.4 P-��`�
'�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:_�7
Date:
21412014

Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
Routine O Complaint
� uu.�i
O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency
nir
O Other ❑ Denied Access
i w urr r■ uirrrr�
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �](, A,1�r7TU Region—"—0
Farm Name: LL ,j_ Owner Email:
Owner Name• ( I'l ! 0 ^j Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = f 0 Longitude: = ° =' =
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Gap�„ity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Daia Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
Pullets ElBeef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
PE3Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other Number of tructures-.111111
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

4-oo
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
)A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement? ((((((
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
VNo
❑ NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refertto qu&fl6h .) Expla�nrany YFS answers;and`�/or an recommendations or an other comments.
�Cd kr �u0$'i'''4£;.y 8sep., Y.a y
Use drawingsp•�oftfacihtyto7lbetter�zplyya�n�swifuationc s: (ukse addi�twionai pages as necessary):
`fix �: lk�Lr fir, �, �«iFai'A r%R:° "���.41i �'.MV3 ia'-.i �il�'iY�Yt�•*' L.�i.:��'.e�� , .
Reviewer/Inspector Name I ~ t Phone;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 121281041 ' Continued

n0("�rJ
Facility Number: Q 61 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ W­Up ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0,0- O (v� 1'30Q� 25. Did the facility fail to con ct a s u g urvey as required by the permit?
0q-.
26. Did the facility ail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes [/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ("No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
L3/No
, ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
El NA
El NE
[I Yes
,�No
Ip No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
;ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
1eNo
25 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addttonal�Comments;ariillor�Dr�a,,wittgs. � '�� -�
a 5, o
,IL(
l212&04

s
L
f Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit 70 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: IT�J Arrival Time: '� iDeparture Time: County: � v Regio
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = n 0 6 = (1 Longitude: 0 ° = ` = "
Design Current
Design
Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry
Capacity
Population Cattle C*apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean to Ipry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish El Layers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other [alurkey Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes [I No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,F.,Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

F
Facility Number: Lim Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes V1"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes 9/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes T" o ElNA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
ElYes
2-f "No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�KNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):; Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendatioKor ahy, mt e "commcdSz,E
Use n � "drgwts of facilit to hetter;ex tarn situations. (use"add►taonal pages as necessar1u� ' M 4q gg *,
o
'u��
4ZIPM
t
Reviewer/inspector Name t;µ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Dater
2128104 Continued

F
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents f
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes {,(J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes /�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment -as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes IQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
XT
ElNA
El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ yes
I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[ILCJ Yes
,�(
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
—I�e.O-t.�
Ow 3 �]
r = 0 o
ri- 01,56
©a A
Wo9q`C4
I/10
W03 O 5(0�2
it/or
c0005 Lr i
t]' 1
(,O c)Ny $ (&,
I l7
jic(j A
I2,128104

L
f Visit QPCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: rival Time: Departure Time: County: 30h AS 40r**j Region:" FV
Farm Name: hOjyy+ON S CjL)"r"A_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: ___.. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Ctifie�d OL_erat r:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:9R-
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 1 = Longitude: ❑ ° =' = "
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Fopulation
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
111E]
❑ Turkey Poults
Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
DischarrZes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
[]Yes ;�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
IffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 1LOW 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
;dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
FfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
iJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
EjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
"�,A�9ie.r i.�`.�- �.,,,a.A't �xitA;� 8ms9 •:4::-� d 9; ��A�t .};::S+F��� �. gH��,����r.,e�: � :$:It
Caggmpeun #) 'Expklam any YES'answers„and/or§any recommendattanyothercomments {�'6 <:}r.:,:arx�14 �9Use _feterplaln situations: (use additionA pages as necessary).a 6¢::
i
7
Reviewer/Inspector Name f _ Phone: 9 'V a r7v
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:LZaZ�&=Date: l d Q
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Numbers f O Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
L A= W ©©o 7Y 5o__y� 62/1y/0s .,cc
w ®� T� y N '//os C w/ -710 S �v6sf
wQ ! 9 ac) nay a+qs q /ao/07
l d P7 /a C) - S, o OL; i o=/, o
0 COL C.Irv�v�
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility No. Co _! Time In Time Out Date
Farm Name Integrator T,�n, _ 52.3
Owner `161\n T Kt1 n l0 r'-I Site Rep d1
f �
Operator ,ihU, No. At,� } q 9 05,, ` �
Back-up No. (,�
COC Circle: General or NPDES "1
Design
Current
Design
Current
Wean — Feed
Farrow — Feed
Wean — Finish
Farrow — Finish
Feed — Finish
Gilts 1 Boars
Farrow —Wean
Others
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed U
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test
Weekly Freeboard
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes
Waste Analysis:
Date
Wettable Acres
_ Daily Rainfall
120 min Inspections
Nitrogen (N)
Sludge Survey
Calibration/GPM 1
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)
Pull/Field Soil Crop Pan Window
U

M Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Sall and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: FacllIty Status: Active Permit: 6M§101QB ---- I_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh _
Date of Visit: 10/17/2008 Entry Time: 107go AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM - Incident M.
Farm Name: Thornton Swine.-4 Owner Email:
Owner: John R Thornton Phone: [phone]
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Faun:
Integrator: TDM Farms Inc
Latitude:35°16'20" Longitude:7=,="
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Sidney W. Taylor Operator Certification Number: 18446
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James Lamb Phone:
On -site representative James Lamb Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510106 Owner • Facility: John R Thomton Facility Number: 510106
Inspection Date: 10/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WA= W00074 N=1.5 7/3/08
WA= W06974 N=2.1 4/14/00
WA= W01920 N=0.95 9/20/07
Soil Sample 2119/08 No lime required
Calibration 1017/08 14.6 GPM
Sludge Survey 10/7108
QIC has changed please submit designation
Continue to improve removal and maintaining trash in structures.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510106 Owner - Facility: John R Thornton Facility Number: 510106
Inspection Date: 10/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 5,536 5,743
Total Design Capacity: 5,536
Total SSLW: 166,080
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 - PRIMARY
agoon 1-SECONDARY 30.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510106 Owner - Facility: John R Thornton Facility Number: 510106
Inspection Date: 10/17/2008 Inspection Type. Compliance inspection Reason for Vislt: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Ara there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
8. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
1101111
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510106 Owner - Facility: John R Thornton Facility Number: 510106
Inspection Date: 10/1712008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Tota I P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crap Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0.0
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510106 Owner - Facility: John R Thomton
Facility Number: 510106
Inspection Date: 10/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection -
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
'Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to Install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

,1
ivision of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- - tl Other Agency
Type of Visit wompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 9Aoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access I
I ­1.0�
Date of Visit: Irrival Time: Departure Time: i S County: M0�26rj Region: .
Farm Name: T H04m)-Too L Owner Email:
Owner Name: Cott ro :[ ti r mmolt)Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator•
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Y
Operator Certification Number: 14W4
Back-up Certification Number: -�✓
Latitude: 0 c = ' = Longitude: = ° = g 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ DEX Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes J2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier;
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ^I�
Observed Freeboard (in): pL
Structure 4
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes [;No
Structure 5
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Structure 6
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8.
Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9.
Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [:IPAN > 10% or ] 0 ]bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)1�4 Illy l'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes 21 No []NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes EgNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records _&_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does t e fa ility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [dyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the ap ropirat box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists TTT
� ❑Design El ❑Other
21. Does record eeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard,,,2<aste Analysis Soil Analysis Powaste Transfers 00OAnnual Certification
E),16infall Vstocking Crop Yield El120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes fflvo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 21No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
© 5 --
2b. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
�.4
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes J1Qo
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
&OJ6 UM&OA 5kid
C
�Vc�,�4lrc��rvr��ffr �
� �RT��v
"off-
���'1 ASSady
—
01/0 . _071
1a.

Type of Visit ,Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 01outine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: =c7b Departure Time: County:JPtf�r10 , Region: � 0
Farm Name: _ B W _` U - ^r -rJ , Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Humber:
Latitude: El o E=I ' =1 Longitude: = 0 0 ; = «
A
llesign Current Design Current Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population C*attle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder ,� 3-6
❑ Non -Layer
1
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Ot e 10 Turkey Poults
❑ Other 10 Other
Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes CerNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
LZNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
'C2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
5KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

.) 4
Facility Number: 51 — Date of Inspection 'i u
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Lff—
Observed Freeboard (in): =4= f -2i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
[ No
El NA
El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
/
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ElNA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
liNo
�(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /p/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evviidre of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Area
s�
12. Crop type(s) % . Ae VA triA-,E6 j
r� to
13. Soiltype(s) -4v. ------ ----- ------ _Dr�►ti�+ems_. A�o a _
2 / v! % Y K
5-, .r 'fu.z
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Jay El Yes ,INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'[] Yes [ANo
El NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes /� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name;Fr f�f� �:' Phone: O
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 t4 vim.• Date: -7 c7
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S I — p( Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
p j
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CiW�MPore(adily available? If yes, check El Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ N1✓
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps El Other
❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the apl1ppy�opriate box below El
❑ Waste Wlication ❑ Weekly reeboard ❑ Waste Abalysiss ❑ So���ia[ysis ❑
Waste Transfers ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ R�all ❑ St king ❑ Cro field ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes 4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct sly ge urvey as required by the permit? 6. r -O z
ElYes PNo
ElNA
❑ NE
-OL-I
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? s g
❑ Yes 'ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes No
El NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
[L[[[
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ YesZ-11-o
[I NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[I NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
IV
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes �allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional.Coinments and/or Drawings:
Coovo �' F;�� �``I o� �a y��r, c�a�S � v� s; T-1
PIt-Uo�tL�.. ��.s�- �}.o,.t£. ��Ra-��Gn�r� �,✓ c.AL�'�a�iT: na ��a.�.�o 4�y ocT_ � tom!
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number j j �'J� 0 Division of Soil and Mater Conservation
Q Other F V i I e n e V311111111111111 I`
I
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation. O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit OrRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 's J Arrival Time: _ �.. Departure Time: County: JD0r4 aTa-J Region: W-Z),
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
1 17
Phone No: Qrf-7-- 1-2 q- Q3g-r
Onsite Representative: C-6✓0- J_6,0Y� 2na integrator: Y"5"GF—
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 17 67`7:1
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = 6 ❑ {I Longitude: = ° = 1 ❑
OD''W
sign CWcurrent
Swine api�ty, Ea�ul tinn
Weth Poultryei
Design C•urient
Capaeiity Pap lati©n
Design Current
Cattle Capacrty Eopulation
❑Dai Cow
Wean to Finish
3
3.3
❑ Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
n-La er
❑Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
x
]Pou Dry ry
it
❑ La ers
�k
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean'
El Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
El Beef Feeder
El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
10 Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
EjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 51 — {rJb Date of Inspection 5 °i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): j 7, 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes V(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes kfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes)ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ycs eZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
'Z­Xer- !of 'b ��/ qj
12. Crop type(s) c..!3 h !A epty" _ n ' S CZ / +s '/ S's
13. Soil type(s) 113 "-N j-'--a 51,4-J 'S:A
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
Cl NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
G u aA---N TI-1 P dru a s 6 ,J Ne*- 1 C Ja C (.N s ,r ✓e-(- j
IC f_ P A -f E y 4' OAf
� 0'f>: r' A� c l AGU s t
6C 4MC_'j' .d t_.G L( Poll
V f Cam R- Aaa/-A- 8 Ls
ReviewerlInspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
77
Phone: g)9 5'? / j�ioa
Date: S J"/ / Q�-
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Sl — 6 Date of Inspection yr
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
'3 tz nt
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAW P readily available? If yes, check ❑C
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
9J.4 all ,.S. z z�I s
❑ Waste AnKation ❑ Week l�eeb and E aste Ana sis ❑ So 1 '/" s ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Itai ll ❑ Stoking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
,j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�fl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
116 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Ciiinmenfs andlbr Drawn s x
+'
�: t:
ZtG. *�V-r'.')Ce rc+ j N i rtA
4 A C - r APPt1 A
Z., P
r P�GT- L c rr� 'T,3
LA 4 o j �r
1-)4-ts
TO C-oM P'-F.T 9
12128104

.. .�., ,3„�` a .a.-,...�... �3 .}7 - t; •k.�. .7-.x�,,. _ . L.. "-6.isi,t'e�. va..,si' .;.EP ",¢. E � � i i -
Type of Visit ,lCoompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
QC Reason for Visit J Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility :`umber DDate of Visit: 3 ZXON&O-Trerational
ime:
Below Threshold
'Permitted ID Certified 0 Conditionallc Certified ❑Registered Date Last Operated or Above T reshold:
Farm !tame: �lii2 if-,(geff4 — rµoa,-( -ro,J County: _� :2
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: "JD Integrator: &S2A-G�
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Dumber:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 09 u Longitude 0« �• �•6
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acih, Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver I 1 ❑ Dai
❑ Feeder to Finish JEJ Non -Laver I I JEJ Non-DaiA,
❑ Farrow to Wean
ElFarrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r,
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. I€ discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed: what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
0510310.7
❑ Yes YNo
❑ Yes 9r�o
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ?(No
Structure 6
Condnued

Facility Number: Sj — 0 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
,TNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
1110
12. Crop type C. '46�42.
13. Do the receiving crops di er with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Lallo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
PNo
Regti red Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Alo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
WUP, checklists, design, etc.)
❑ Yes
(ie/ maps,
,�TNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrXation, freeorard, r analysis & soil seCmple reports) i�����
❑Yes
Io
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ONo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
;ZNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
discharge, freeboard
❑ Yes
p No
(ie/ problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24. oes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[XNo
25Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
9 N
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
uestion�# i Ei� lain an Y.I;S answers andlur`an ref mendations orlon other comments: Comments. (refer to(q) p y y y /
IUse:drawmgs of facility to better explain -situations. {use addittonal pages as necessary) ,f Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ti61 my Date: 3 OO
O5103101 f Continued

Facility Dumber: 31 — j0.4 1 Date of inspection 3 LS
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes V'Vo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes VNo
0 Yes fGl No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes J!�No
'Additional, Corn ments'andlor,Drawings: �', .
05103101

y�.
Type of Visit QItompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 'ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number O Date of Visit: fit' `� 'rime: Z "'
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
"edpermitted o Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: —� _ ����. �`�� County: oIn J If
Owner Name: _
0
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Pit PlAx C
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: t—zs_ lann::CAE
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 CC Longitude 0 4 iG
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulation ' Poultry Capacity Population Cattle : u
Ca aci Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ La cr I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -La er I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts .. i.
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ILI Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI S rav Field Area
Holdm Ponds Q,S id Tra s , [] No Li uid Waste Mana ement S stem
pu
Discharges & 5tream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): �3
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: S 1 — t) Date of Inspection zZ 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
W No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
ONO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
N
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
,�,/
LXNo
1 L Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
�B "�L
El Yes
�No
r
12. Crop type [� , gEl sDAr C.C� tZN i s F1— Sg
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
jzf No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ N
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
'PrI o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Reutilred Records & Documents ll
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & G� aS'a4ermit or other P jrmi readily available? ElYes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Ale Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
�, 'q
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/�ation, freeboard, s7e analysisL-G & soil sa<m�l✓ teports) ❑ Yes OrNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes06"No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes A! No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 6, NN�o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ElJ
Yes QNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes , 2<0
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 1d'No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
refer to, uestiot° y Co m]ents ( q n #) Explain any YES answers andlor'an iecomtnendations or any o n comments +
x
Sf�&lilt &S' w"8 ✓ 'i� • . —+�
Use drawingsioflfacility to tiettcr�iepIRONatious.
(use�additional`pa� asnecessary)..° Field Copy ❑Final Notes
nu.�.. Yi.•'S. L3 .47i,h;_ mil....=,r./a Y. t. '+x ., ..:%Sr�i.:• Ya r.:•:)m..sau6
H
Reviewer/inspector Name
.D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2
O5103101 % r Continued

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit wRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number a Date of Visit: 5 2 Time: C = �
Not O erational Below Threshold
,Wpermitted,XCertified ©Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name:___ �f ra��b� County:. Jc'A:O"j xl aJ
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: I Title: ) Phone No:
Onsite Representative: G" —rPmIntegrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ 5wlne ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design
Swine Ca aci
❑ Wean to Feeler
Current -
P,o ulation P,oultr" +
11L gz�j
Deslgn Current
`.Ca aci P,o ulation Cattle
�Dai
Design -urrentEM
Ga aci Population
eeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
>>
'
Total Design C►apaciffy,
Total SSLW
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Ares
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ Spray Field Area
Discharges &Stream Ininacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: "Jw A!:V
Freeboard (inches): / 2
05103101
❑ Yes J'1Qo
❑ Yes CIKO
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes J2'IGo
❑ Yes ' '�o
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes J2,1 o
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: S I — l 06 1 Date of Inspection 2-3 ,0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application ElExcessive Ponding ❑ P N ❑ Hydraulic Overload
So Sd e0 52 t '7 L
12. Crop type C:.
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes YNo
El Yes
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes P<O
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those desil6ated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
lopl�o
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste,application equipment?
❑ YesNo
Reauired
17.
Records & Documents ��
Fail to have Certificate Cover Permit Permit
of g eneral or other readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Ce4 el Rnimal Waste Management�Ptan readily availablle
�"� '
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ,.ri i'+�
El Yes
19.
7
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, oard,�s e analysis i& soil sample r4*d-r PA CO
if
❑ Yes
irNo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
J2<0
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2<0
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
;D NNo
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
.E No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
'O o
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
RE No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer";to question-#) 1H'Explain any Yy n � � ' ° ' y .. ES answers and/or an recommendations or an oth r cominenfs.
Use ilia vings of facility to better eitplain situations {use additlonal,pages;as_ne'ssa�y) "
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
ions. (use. � „_..��.
/aP.,, c w o,,4-Ge_ xlg�p— �J�Su - :mil_&- To •J v SFF�f
/rt 4„I I r h pA^Lo ":4-6 a" 0,4LL�; .
zg- so't_ S ?'Zo q%', 33v
Reviewertins ector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S 3 C)Zr
05103101 Continued

Facility Number. 5 1— 10 Date of Inspection I
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation`?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged Fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes t No
ElYes No
❑ Yes [Z/No
❑ Yes ;�n3 N
❑ Yes J�'Yo
❑ Yes o
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
T
05103101

1 9 i—.°IE EI 1 93 li k6 e {y G 3t. € Et SI 3 t3 ° .Ev!isw io€ ni! ;lo¢ fWIEaF''L e: r Q33 n--3 alI ltF nyh,
3ii OIAEvnsinnof Snxand Water CtI. Io113. nseIr�v31a,'
t4€
{
3 3 '
O Other Agency t. i It ri, 1,� i(3( ,.
i I P �1. ': _ I Y II I I.. !€ i 1 IwiE E- i F 5}e:
t t
1 �':'� I ! :j 31 E., l3., I €;;'.€ ° ti t� i';�: iEi i i. }:€ 1 t� 31 9i E E i�! e; t,t;iY 3 E ,I IEppe�tit
.t . ai r". E i� ;, I : E �'. l �_! :: . t5"Il f
Type of Visit Com liance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date. of Visit: Time: 1 :� 343 Printed on: 10/26/2000
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above
.................................
Threshold:
Farn Name: ......................................... TA0(zr-..4County _S-f�`i
................................................. i. .................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:.................,. Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .... ($. T14A!�f.....Ca£ e,to...., .E ,p,tf ... Integrator: ............ PZEA, .7—!Q K,.......C.- .-1, --m...
Certified Operator:.......................................................................................................I........ Operator Certification Number:...........................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 14 Longitude ' i 44
Design Current
Swine Cattacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
ElLaye°r ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes _&No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? El Yes Ef No
b. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, ngtify DWQ) ❑ Yes 1;1No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated now in gal/min? <
cf. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Ef No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 01No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes prrio
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Structurc I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:...............f...�.j.................. �t.iM................................................
Freeboard (inches): `i V 1 Z
5/00
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes B No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..............................................................................................................
Continued on back

R I
Facility Number: 371 — I Date of Inspection 6 Z$ D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ONO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )eNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes CT I0
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 00
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j �Io
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes Vo
12. Crop type C , 43 EA dv% %M pr .t j Ay / Z &
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of CoUaSON General Permit readily ava' abbe?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified )nVal Lstela ag ment Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) !! f JI
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, frepard, wasteli3atlyjssi soil s lre :ns')
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified'AWMP?
�'�iQ yiola>riQgs'o dg�c enoe� wore p#ed- d. 0ift �h;s;visit; Yo>�t waif t; eeeiye o fu4 tbor
rorrespo deice. albauti this visit`
a.uaa�a c:aa:a wAaiucauvu ark• 'aiA�liYiil Y4'.ILV QialT Gaq QilYl Vi uaaJ■RvaaWicuaaouva
❑ Yes ;2110
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �ZO
❑ Yes
❑ Yes f �'4Io
❑ Yes JP O
❑ Yes PNO
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 2(No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes lei
❑ Yes
Mfigems: owl Ta .,4;t.as - ���Dom'- �'[� CA4iJGV- 1dTrEGO-A.4'04 �
Y-o- 63E �P•- DE,ce.�S'� .1"t SS L� .
la) f1PPt��n S�vafl�+-sue �� zz�J jJ�d�d��s� I?tz�,
fAC jTp,,wJ Tip -BPS (L-
s, E
`y
y iewer/Inspector Name j�
I�:'.; .. 9- �,a � 1{ u. ��� ii � i �'ea 9� ��i:E"1R
ki!f �� `. E ff,�j. ` ` ' % ' �%' a ah
FRevie"er/Inspector
a
i
Jt�
Signature:
Date: �� l t S/pp

� r�\
' �
� — t
...,
r � � � � -
r. ..
'r, t�
�! 1 1.
_ _ � _�. _
* � .l i s � f
4
I • • 1l.
r
, i ..
�`
.�
4
i
�� t � ` A
i ��

Facility Number: 5 f Date of Inspection 16
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes /,ZNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes �NO
❑ Yes PYNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes P*O
❑ Yes PTO
5/00

Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-ue of DW2 inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number J a Date of Inspection Z �o
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [l Registered JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
.........M County: .�VjjST�1Farm Name: .............9.114....c.......a..............'.Tt3...... '......................................
Owner Name: GPS u+� ro .3o DaTa 6 q�5
........................................�.................t...,......,.....................�.........)...,. Phone No:..............:...�......-�................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:...............................................................: Phone No:........
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative. ,� r�°�r'"� 6Fs% pE jAtEa Integrator: TD �
p...............,...........................................��...................
CertifiedOperator: ................................ .................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
..................................................... ... ....................................... 7
Latitude �� �� ���� Longitude
Dena n ��� Current ' .'Dest n' Current '� "�°'� Desa n ', `
Swyne ::� ,Capa 'Poiilation. ,rPoultrY. Ca'acgtty Po ulatiori Cattler� s:' `;Ca`acty 'Po'pulatio
.. i'h I, a 1 a
- .., p n
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
ZvaA
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer El Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other I`'t ' `,�, •'i
TotalrDesign Capacrty,=ir
Total S8LW;1
i
Number of La oohsit, it �i
i
rr '� ❑ ubsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
2 iAS
❑Spray Feld Area
Holdm Po � r • o Liquid Waste Management System
g nds l Sohd Traps °> ❑ N
c >
d
Discharges & Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes WIo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes' ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. .Does discharge bypass a lagoon s~tern? If yes, notify DW )
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes P' - Y
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........... 3................................................. .................................... .................. I ................ ......................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes -1110
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

I-u
Facility Number: Date of Inspection as
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
JZ(No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
;!(No
Waste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type c- , ( rtM u p A ,d.A? .�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with Zose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
PNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes JZ`No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 9110
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ONo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste a lysis & soil satpie reports) ❑ Yes [2 No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes f No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [I Yes ,B't o
23. Did Re viewed]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ;�_40
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ;3�No
5. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes EfNo
10 yioiaiitjris'o d ficiet3cies i�trre npte(I• Oirring •this:visit; • Yoir Wiii �eegiye do #'u> th�r .
�:. ctir'resuotideii�ce: about: this visit. ...................::::::::....... .
c-azo PS ; ,j U.t, u . P, .a..1 F w t? s u c -fo '3 P r f t ; ILO To rim E�A� -
!Sl C_bnSrgt s '! +✓off VOa'G6ED GRSr-YcA/- AAr A7 6oav sFA,,rj Ad' 7411I`l ►�rsr7 _
L o.J c�,r r rE Tf--F a wry o -T'Af'S ,S11-3WO
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
71
Date: 2�
A,

. i
Facility Number: S -- j Date of Inspection z
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
INO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
O"No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
�No
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
QNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
No
Addiflonak,Comments an or rawings• ss ;' +' fi' i,Y,
§'.l+ ' ', t 14s

c ,.. 4 EN a E� n._Division of Soil and:Wks rr lCanservagon,
3 i I jE L `°:�: Et Dlvisi LI Of SOIL `and. ` - 1
k, °0 o Water• Conservation :Compliance lnspeet�dn
A . 1 e•1 r bivi$IUn of Water I ualltjr-Gompllance p - ' 3 4 �t �Ait1i
F .. 1 l �', '7 i� Ff
! Ot}I p.IIS ec4on,..>,, 1 a
A enc
b
� . 0- O erahOni k 3 , s € t t 1 i < 3 n. i =. , I
g Y; "_ .� . �Rev1eW ,,;. � .. :i , ,;,1,$ a�rr! ,. �k �s
UlMoutine Mi2oftt 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 7 l
'11me of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified Q Conditionally Certified E3 Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: �� �aasT �`k-a�'(b..� County:..........)!!1S'T�.J ..........
.....Jo ...............�--..............................,.....................................................
OwnerName:............................................................................................ ........ Phone No: ...............................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:.....:.......................................................... Phone No:........................................
'Mailing Address:...................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..&� �!� .^+................................. .. Integrator: T.P.t--, ::.......................................................
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
0&
................................. ............ ................... I ...... ................................................................ ........... ........... ................................................... ................... I.—.........................
Latitude Longitude
Design
Swine Capacity
a,
❑ Wean to Feeder
eeder to Finish Z Asa
❑ Farrow to Wean
[] Farrow to Feeder
alp ❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts E
❑ Boars
Number of'Lagoon's
Holldi ig Ponds / Solid Traps
Current 'Design', Current ; Design Current
Population :;.Kultr C `' ,,: , ... Cattle
�Ca acit Po ulation Y �. a acit .Po elation
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
Vj
❑ Other
1s
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
li �❑ Subsurface Drains Present J10 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
S Management Waste Liquid Li No stem
�: t ❑ q g Y
Discharees & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon [ISpray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: - Z S-TAGC
Freeboard(inches): ...................!;; .7...... ..... .... ............ ..................................... ....................................................... ...... ........................ /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes
seepage, etc.)
Continued on back
3123/99
❑ Yes A'No
❑ Yes ,jJ No
❑ Yes 21'No
❑ Yes No
ElYes20-
N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes PIo
Structure 6

1-1,-., 1 .1 ::

Facility Number: f — ]late of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid -level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type C. ro.,. GRA %A CA Q-1)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
.PI• 'R 0,4,Z
vms�
t Plan (CAWMP)?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems,.over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Rio yiblaiigns'or deficiencies *6re h.. t..e.d, dO< ing (bis. 'vis. it. ' • Y:ott wiXI I eegiye �iti futthgr
correspo, n, deuce. abntit. this .visit. • . •
Comments (refer€to,ques4on #} Explain any YES`answers and/or any reconiinendat�ons or;any other 6mme
a� ^.� t i -. ! =�, �t � - d` � t �� , : °t 3 [td9. 3� 3 s ! � � �
g - tyi i;,+ p� .•• , ( se' o pages ey) !, „t3. , i
Use ' drawtn of factlt to l�etfet;Fex lain sttuations use.addtbonap a es as necessa_ ! alr t l }
�\ 3t S'vRE To P-ECA -D '�M€. CDcrR �.,l, ct` PAS B4 cqE.• _r
1 "Jar r- APPt %t A-00-C VJAW � Arc - 14
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ;?'No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 9 No
[-]Yes Rl"No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ;2 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes ;2'�io
❑ Yes ZfNo
❑ Yes 2'Flo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes [2 No
❑ Yes [;;V<o
❑ Yes PKNo
❑ Yes 12'No
❑ Ye's RfNo
❑ Yes . �ko
�> F�scc T�-y PvrLc SC'� oC .ka.r�r� o.�.tEJL 'r4WS SWOIk In P-T.%.P s:oEs 6P
Reviewer/Inspector Name r'�'•
nT F'r r
tiN
Reviewer/Inspector Signature's Date: 1 T3� 4q
3/23/99

i
,.
1
i 11 1•�
�.
i
r �
,

Facility Number: date of Inspection l� ^
~Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes /No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes INo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 4Na
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes dNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 1plyes
❑ No
Mona or nments and/or, rawing5 , , 1 ""T."
t 4€
.... ., _ �.�.... I ..,__..., ... , s, ,.. ..,.�. � ,« � ' .�.. �€ .. c..>^ , e _ .. ,i.1i �i
p n��S wI � �—K� � a-... �� �,. 't'o.�. C.y... 1 �v.�'►- Sa.v��
1
3/23/99

r
*" ivtsJoIn of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Divisiano€Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance inspection
bivision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
© Other. -Agency - Operation Review
ICFRoutine 0 Com plaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ' ins section 0 l+ollovv-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of• In'I)CL- iori L
Time of Inspection Q 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered ID Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ............................................................................................ .. ....................... county: ............................
Owner Name: ................................................I'lione No:
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Fitle:...................... ... I'hone No:
MailingAddress: ;. ............................ .............................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:. Tp 1�.Il.y... lutetirator .................r...1..-,t'................•.........................
Certified Operator: .................................. . ............... ............................................................. Operator Certification NTumber:..........................................
Location of Farm:
T.
Latitude C�• �° Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1101,aguonArea 1EISprayField Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑'No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of'the State'? (lf ycs, notify DWQ)
c. ]f discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min"
d. Does discharge hypass a 3a000n systcrn? (li'ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 SIT'LICIurc 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes )� No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes r0
❑ 'Yess ❑l�fo
Structnrc 6 /
ldcntificr:
Freeboard(inches]: � . �. L,�............. ....... ............................. .... I ..................... ......... ........... I....................... ....................... I...........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observcd't (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes [� No
seepage, etc.)
3/73199 Continued on back

Facility Number:�� — k) Bate of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes �Z(No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(/Yes
[:]No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ko
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
Cl Yes
o
12. Crop type r_5 Z
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
00
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
7No
c) This facility is pended for a wettabie acre determination?
❑ Yes
VrNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[;KNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records A, Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does ego - eping r����veWc Q?r iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facilitynotin compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fait to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: 10 yiolaticjfr.. clefieier�. ..were potted d4fitig •this:visit: • Y:oit Wiil•>�eboiye tiq i`urth�
correspondence. about. this visit_
❑ Yes �NO
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [ 111
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ?No
❑ Yes ❑10
... rM",�
Comtnents,(refer�to questron #} 3 Explain auy,YES answers and/or any,recommendations or any other,commentsE � rl}
Ilse drawin of facile ;tq better`ex lam situatiois use additional. appEes asiteeessa 1' �El 11E'�yrY''»3 7'�1'€, s !�i��' : p"its =a
�.f. -�•.". �. (.. P,.q�b:'.d:fl �a, ;'.16�.&SA7.%t;.'I:S':1'� ... u..!Y� ke�,di..-,li.�,11 , x.:: ,: <rE�
V ECrE .6 nz�v �) AJ s t �� P ,tlb 1L r 0F i �u2 c; ss •
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ae_ f —..t Date: xcl jr S f
3/23/99

�M_ $ !z.! 18
Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
®'Division of Water Quality
LO -
Routine O_Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
unnirrr - -
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 5 f i
Time of Inspection ZOO 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered OCertified [3 Applied'for Permit O Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: .......................... _ Count
FarmName:..... ............... �.. ... Y:..,�'i'k l!...............................................................
Owner Name• JDr yl ' ► h+�- Phone No: ` S
.........................�.............................................................................. ..C. �Q�...�.r..........ct
Facility Contact: �D.hn...... ...{ ref Title: Phone No: 4��0� 5 6 �r .. �[S
rr--. f
Mailing Address:.......I. .�.........I Qsf......VA.Ir�-� ..Rl.................... ....... :........................
I............
OnsiteRepresentative ...... .` n eno ,r�1L ::en ... Integrator:....TD. ........ .......................................................
�0 Certified Operator ........n .Q ... Operator Certification Number- EQ,Q, 22cp,,,,
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Design
Current -
Design Current a Design Current
Svvtne Capacity PaliulaktonPaultry
Capacety Papulat�on Cattle, ' ' Capacity%}Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
airy
Feeder to Finish
QQ
'�
❑ Non -Layer
:
❑Non -Dairy
x
i
❑ Farrow to Weangg
fr:AF
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
y
❑ Farrow to Finish
_ 'Y'otl DeSIP;'n Ca}laCliy
�3.
❑ Gilts
:
�
y
❑Boars
Total SS L W
.r
v, 4,.
Number of Lagcwq ns / Haldtng Ponds ®
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ i.agoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
111v
a F
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
"^i.`%Fe"E�S �'t '! dxe� . �' Sv`,�, .'�i ''x n!.3j6.e=,bW�`=w2e
. :':.
n
General
s 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [P-No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [-i'No
F
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [}"No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes U-No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes O�-No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [9-No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes (Ko
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes B"NO
maintenance/improvement? __,//
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ,dam� NNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes Lf1vo
7/25/97

Faci ty Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes O'No
Structures (L_azoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Nits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [jrNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: !3 '..... t. ... . ............................................................................................
Freeboard ft L � .... �� ................... ........................
():.............I.........................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 93'&o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑-No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [R1Qo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ��//
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 93 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes BINo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enteringAvaters of the State notify
rein `ro t4ee..r�- p
15. Crop type �1( l . S..ry... V........ ��*.. nrL.... ,-,n �. W.heO` .1... Wrin-i�r
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 92"iVo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
O No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
3<o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
BNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
(IQo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
03T,4o
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
(-Rio
For Certified or Permitted, Facilities Only;
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
03-No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
O-No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
[No
0° No.viO'1Aons°or deficiencieswere-noted-du' ing this', visit'. You:will ikei ve•no•ftirther' ,"
:. corresPOWebO dhout this;vWt. ' ' ::. :
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: v Date:

V_
O Routine O Complaint O Follow -tip of DNVQ ins ection Q Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ? 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered © Certified E3 Applied for Permit ©Permitted 0 Not O erationxl Date Last Operated:
FarmName: County......................................................................................
OwnerName ................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact . Title................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ... .4N............ :�tJ........................... Integrator: ........ .f ..'• (•..................I—............................
Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number...............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude I Longitude • 6 I� «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Ifdischar�-ye is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in pl/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number —
8. Are where lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
a
Structures (Lieoons.11oldine Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:me�{��y,
w
Freeboard (ft) ......11.1................. ......5�.`�.....,.,..... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
plication
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
15. Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[� No.vio'lationsor. de'riciencies.rvere-notedduring this:visit.-:You.rvill i-eceiive'ito ftirther
correspbadence about -this'.visit., : ..: .
6m Eti0 TO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes /No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
...........................................
❑ Yes 9A0
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes PeNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/[nspector Signature%%%%n,A �, _ /��i Date: 1

r — .-;�
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
vision of Water Quality 6
l91Itoutine O Complaint O Follow -tip of MV0. ins action 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 11-� N r
Facility Number (r�
Time of Inspection I i : 00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ©Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not O cratinnai Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .. ). ! ...... sN..e::.........../Countv:....... rl.G..... �.St..... J.............................................
..............................................................
Owner Name: 2i �.f r'nJ Phone No :................ b q `t
1.1v}.................b....,............... T,..Q...................,..............,. 'r!,......... .................. ...,..� jj
Facility Contact: ...... ) �N R.Plt9..... & rfv��.. . Title Q4.s'v� Phone No: . DP I..��.Y..'..6.4...fS 17!
Mailing Address: p'✓............................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ..............s.@." a ... Integrator: .............. T.O"t..�4...................... .................
Certified Operator;......: ?kk!�.•......Q'Stb! Yti... ... .....mbi-WIAty .. Operator Certification Number;. .................
Location of Farm:
J
....................................... ......................... .... ............................................ ....................................................... I.......................,�..........................................1..........................
.............
�.'t..i-.........c�..........,1.!"7....�N............ ��,Y................t.......4................................................................. w
Latitude • =' =11 Longitude • �� �"
�. Design Current
¢; Design Current. ' �x , Design Current",Y
Swute Capacity Population
4
}P Poultry , Capiieity Populahony > Cattle a Capacity Populahonu
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE1 Layer
I I
Dairy
011
Feeder to Finish
2066
Non -Layer
❑Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Wean-,
, :., v . ,
c
❑Farrow [o F
Feeder
❑Other ::. {7
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capadty.
❑Gilts
`-.
-
.
�7
❑ Soars
. : �.
'�P t�. } �' {
T S W--
otal SL
%
a
3 i
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds'
` ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
.
�.
} ❑ No em Liquid Waste Management Syst
n
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes I3<0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9-No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes R-Ko'
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes lj<o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -aUmin?
.d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [9-K-0
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Cl Yes G3-<0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes !r►��d<0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ElYes 19'No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 19 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 03'�o
7/25/97 Continued an back

1.
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds. Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: Z �a�e+,,•,
........................... I.. ......... ...
Freeboard (ft):.............:.u........... ...............!?
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes M 1 To
Structure 5 Structure 6
. . ..... . .. . . . ........................... ,, ......
,.. . . . .1.. .
ly ❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 2<0
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 21 o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........0 c r.r ......................I................�.ut ........................ 'Q � Sn �e ti. s,
.........................................................Y....... .........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For .ertilied or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.Vloiationl -or de'rjdeni de's.were'tloted dttring'this.Visit'. .Yotl'wiii 16cei'e''n6.ftirther .
: - . • correspondei><ce. ab"out �fhis•.visit..:.:.: •... • :. � ... : ' ::: � • � � , ..
1? ., fir" S A- -
Reviewer/Inspector Name
fro 11 # 1 -? * Z
❑ Yes Ll N_0
❑ Yes [D f o
❑ Yes OkNo
❑ Yes 91 0
❑ Yes EKO
❑ Yes (�o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 03No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 19<0
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L—A* ,A, Ak _.gam Date:

ivision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency 4
x ❑ Division of Water Quality g
IRMO
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection �/ 24 hr. (hh:mm )
❑ Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:........1....-'L1..........L County:........1♦N.S.✓..`.........................................
'� .......... ............................... .......
OwnerName:....L.!!I�...................1....I1L�.��..f�i. ..... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ....... F........................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..( (!►1.1r-,.1..' f. ~??7Q.A .... '..�T..�� '....l. NAL"Integrator:.. Q ,/.Iq ...........................................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.................. ...................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • ' 64 Longitude ' 6 46
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes LEI No
El Yes 1YNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 1�fNo
❑ Yes V'No
❑ Yes U5 No
❑ Yes [/No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?

h 1
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes EINo
Structures {Lagoons.Holding fonds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? jrYes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 0
tm
Identifier: '��.S�uMrl�ltlL.�j................. ................ .......................................................................
/ a'
Freeboard ft .................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
gNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
4 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
ZYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
[/No
Waste .application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
'!�No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .Cr 7!/P......... 1.5'iL............. ............ ...................................... ..................... .................................................. .... ...... ................ .....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWW)? *Z�res �No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
D"No
❑ Yes
[/N0
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[ITNo
❑ Yes
Q* 0
❑ Yes
[)No
[es
El No
❑ Yes
E�No
0- No.vialations oi deficien' de's.were-noted-during this;v:isit.• :You:will recei've,no-furdier
:�;�correspbndencealioutthis�visit:•:•;�; ��;�: :-:�:�:�:�:�: "`� �-:•:•:•' ::�;-•.•;-:•:•;�;�:�:�:-�•:•:•
4 (-06',V N0 i Acre%v rev A'2 ' /3 y
2 K �cf IF7x� 3 A�� .J . IV AwRjt,
yV iF-1—
�t.(, t ,BAN"s T& G-ei Pl-AN /9/yli+lEA)�0J2-a-Fi.e7- �- cfZdfl0t ic_
PQ,a ctr p v �. S tr u nJ T�-�r I�r r� �� �o,� ; n a o F �. /,��(!p IN orb
�Jvp t,.1/01i 10 P 41 S ,o it
7-6
3 , ;pG c--s or -r ACT. FR�w t-tt'd v n�i SL'� /r/ w�?CE ko
4 lJ,,h G4�k- fi=r �- 'iS 7I25I97 LocE55
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�A -01l %T�/, /-/ , natP• Z% %j a 14 l/

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
lip Routine O Complaint O Follow-upof D"'Q inspection 0 Follo,-v-up of DSNVC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection a t 7
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
Farm Status: [I Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (e.:1.25 for'l hr 15 min)) Spent (in Review
t�Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection;,includes travel and processing)
Not Operational I Date Last Operated
Farm Name, C unty: �J..o...H.4.. .%...................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................ Phone No...............,.. ..........,
Facility Contact : ................... ..... Title: ... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... .....,......,................,....................................................... ..........................
Onsite Rep resentative:...D.8m.............. f 14( ...... Integrator.........................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm-
Latitude ' 4 « Longitude • 4 «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4130197 maintenance/improvement?
c
c
❑ Yes 0.No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes / No
❑ Yes ;dNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[INo
❑ Yes
E�'No
❑ Yes
No
��
Continue on bacl

Facility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons andlor }'folding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure ? Structure 3
.............................:... .. ,:........................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes 43 No
❑ Yes PfNo
❑ Yes 1P No
Cl Yes 16 No
Structure 4 Structure 7 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
VTNo
❑ Yes
jNo
Yes
❑ No
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes '0 No
Waste Anolication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes PNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff ente ' ng waters of a State, notify DWQ)
r,
15. Crop type ........C............
........ /.Ll..� .. .................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
18. • Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
19. '
is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ o
21.
Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
VNo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
V(No
G-csl� s w r= �G
�o s� E asp(LIV ) � t,� -� , H -
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
616ivision of Water Quality
WRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO hiss action. O Follow-un of .[)SW(: review O Other 1
Facility Number
Date of Inspection �, ,&
,s ►
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ©Certified U Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ............T�?or nl�n! S.W. V* — l County: Q.±.V;4,:1..................................................
.................................... .............................................................
Owner Name: ll..... ............ Phone No `t1.9 n 0 ..............................
........... }� ............. ..��.R.I('+lr/....................................,.. r4'�.'1....,.... � �....
Facility Contact: )i.Aw.......... 7A.ottitAu•V N v- .... Phone No: ..4.l..�..,.. ' y"
l.....................,p�itle/}.......�0..!11......11'........................,_.}, m.........�..
Mailing Address: ....... 414........ T�o,illi.�Rl.1/...................L... ,.!,�9. ....-Z4��......zv-&41.4! .....drox.f..:......,.tv.L...... .7— .U.4
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:.......... am. ..........................................................
Certified Operator;................................................................... .. Operator Certification Number:...................
Location of Farm. .
Latitude �• 0'
'?SwuEte"'
Capacity Population,
❑ WeaEto eeder
FeedFinish
❑Farrow to Wean
x
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
a
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude • 6 °'
Design Current
'Poultry 'i ;;=Capacity Populatton' Cattle,
❑ Layer ❑ Darr}
❑ Non -Laver I I ❑ Non-
1LJ Other
a r Total Design Cap
. Total ,
General , �
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes LIffN�o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [I Yes L�I,Ko
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
.d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ao
❑ Yes ao
❑ Yes I2N<�o
❑ Yes 21 o
❑ Yes ,�o
❑ Yes iad'iv o
❑ Yes ;�O,
❑ Yes
Continued on back

1
Facility Number: S /V tp
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons, Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 10� �h+}��r„ ......S.GPlirp/..
Freeboard (ft): ............ ....................... .
................................. ................................... .................................... ........ I....................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type C OR54k 1
❑ Yes 211<0
❑ Yes 3<0
Structure 6
❑ Yes &�o
❑ Yes i<o
..........................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal- Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No,violitio'ns-or defcieitcies.were noted during this:visit: You.*ill receive'no•ftirther ;
correspbndepce about this'.visit:, "
❑ Yes 59-Ko
❑ Yes i1� Ko
❑ Yes &R<
❑ Yes 934o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Ins ector NameUn
� AN.� �
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��� �i� Date: /OI11- CI

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
Jul 14 195 15:42 P.01/11
fast-ii- F<=,x Note 7671 02,10 or
pages �
7o From
C Co
0.
Phonth
Phone
Fax k ] Fax
-3)
J
P . '17
Site Requires Immediate Attention ✓
`J '
FaciUry Number: 5
ON RECORD
1995 It
41 2
Owner: .p .� o Farm Name:
County- o
Agent Visiting Site: /V C _5e, I- Phone: _ --S?/9 S3$1
Operator: Ste_, f !.s 4t Ad 0 � Phone: 1 910 --__T9 y-: os&1
On Site Representative; Phone.
Physical Address: o - -/v,,
Mailing Address:
Type of Operation- Swine _k-,f Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: I Number of Ardmals on Sites
Latitude: _�5 0 ZA " Longitude: 75 0
Type of Inspection: Ground Aerial --,"
Circle Yes or No
Dons the Animal Waste lAgooa have sufficient freeboard of I Foot } 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Feet Inches
F r facilities with more than one Iagoon, please address the other lagoons" freeboard under the
comments section_
Wa4 stay seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)? Yes o No Was there erosion Qf the darn?_ Yes uc�
Is adequate land available for larrd application'? Yes r No Is the cover crop adequate? . 5e>sr No
Additional Comments. 'P e r r a4
Fax to [phone] Signature of Agent

a o� aa3 ay po(-e ved P PO
Poi U�i�'�)'J�� �la��l� a;i�r�
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
51-106
County: Johnston
Facility Name: Jeffery_ Thornton
Certified Operator Name: Jeffery Thornton Operator Number:
994250
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon Lagoon 5
1
N
12
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: _9/21/2018
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
Jeffery Thornton Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
910-594-0219
Date: 9/26/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 2
line m = 299.0 lb PAN
2,
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line.m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 299.0 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
4179
SS
small grain overseeed
4.86
50.00
243.0
SEP-APR
36881
1
small grain overseeed
2.29
50.00
114.5
SEP-APR
3688
2
small grain overseeed
2.64
50.00
132.0
SEP-APR
3688
3
small grain overseeed
3.00
50.00
150.0
SEP-APR
3688
4
small grain overseeed
2.93
50.00
146.5
SEP-APR
3688
5
small grain overseeed
2.73
50.00
136.5
SEP-APR
4175
6
small grain overseeed
2.36
50.00
118.0
SEP-APR
4175
7
small grain overseeed
1.54
50.00
77.0
SEP-APR
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1117.5 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section ll) = 299.0 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 1117.5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -818 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Application onto existing spray fields began as weather and field conditions permited. New sample at lab.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 12
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 30944 ftz
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 135019 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 30418 ft3
In. current herd # F---5-5-36-1 certified herd #1 5536
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 6/15/2018
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
30418 ft'
® ft3
18051 ft3
60425 gallons
1.53 Ibs11000 gal.
299.0 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

41"
r
.. , ��.�• mod, r������
0A emwck
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
51-106
County:
Johnston
Facility Name: Jeffery Thornton
Certified Operator Name: Jeffery Thornton Operator Number: 994250
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1
N
14
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from;the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 10/11/2016
II hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by -Curtis Barwick Technical Specialist
Jeffery Thornton _ _ _ Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 10/14/2016
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

J
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN'STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 2
line m = 227.5 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
1b PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 227.5lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ ❑O NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u, application window°
4179
SS
small grain overseeed
4.86
50.00
243.0
SEP-APR
36881
1
small grain overseeed
2.29
50.00
114.5
SEP-APR
3688
2
small 2rain overseeed
2.64
50.00
132.0
SEP-APR
3688
3
small grain overseeed
3.00
50.00
150.0
SEP-APR
3688
4
small grain overseeed
2.93
50.00
146.5
SEP-APR
3688
5
small grain overseeed
2.73
50.00
136.5
SEP-APR
4175
6
small grain overseeed
2.36
50.00
118.0
SEP-APR
4175
7
small grain overseeed
1.54
50.00
77.0
SEP-APR
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1117.5 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 227.5 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

w
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 1117.5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -890 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Application onto existing spray fields began as weather and field conditions permited.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure NamelIdentifier (ID): 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 14.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 5.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 30944 ft'
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 96442 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 30418 ft3
h. current herd # 5536 certified herd # 5536
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
I. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 6/15/2016
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
30418 ft3
0 ft3
18051 1ft3
60425 gallons
1.45 Ibs11000 gal.
227.5 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
02-08-2012
This plan has been prepared for:
Thornton Brothers Farm�N�r r�«)
Thornton Boothers-%-wQ-T�"
218 Harper House Road
Newton -Grove, NC28366
910-594-1054
This plan has been developed by:
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
2 73 6 NC Highway210
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156
Developer Signature 0
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by. the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: og ou—
Technical Specialist Signatur Date
------------------------------ --- ---------------.........
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-08-2012 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 733,440 gals/year by a 3,840 animal
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1689
Incorporated
2901
Injected
3195
Irrigated
1836
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1,836
2688
-852
1,073,738
-340,298
Year 2
1,836
2688
-852
1,073,738
-340,298
---- ----- -- ---- - ----- -- ------ ----------- ---------- - --- -------- ---- -
Note: ]n source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-08-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

Narrative
The user defined N rate of 100#/acre on the cereal rye overseed is allowed according to Appendix 1.21A
of SB 1217, 8th Guidance Documents. (See Attached)
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15th to provide the best opportunity for winter growth.
Drilling seeds into ben-nudagrass sod that is less than 3" in height will produce more consistent stands.
Broadcast seeding into short bermudagrass sod followed by a light disking should produce adequate
stands. If broadcasting seeds, the seeding rate should be L5 times the rate for drilled seedings. The last
application of animal waste to the bermuda should be prior to August 31. An application of 50#/acre of
Plant Available N may be made to the rye between September 15th and October 30th. An additional 50
#/acre of PAN may be made in February -March. Rye must be harvested for hay prior to heading or
April 7th, whichever comes first. Later harvest could cause shading of the bermuda and reduced yields.
If the rye is to be grazed the N rate must be reduced by 25% (max. application of 75#PAN/acre).
This plan is a revision of plan written 04/22/2008 by Doug Niemond of TDM Farms. That plan was
developed to concur with wettable acres determination done 05/17/07.
Edward Humphrey
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Plan developed to concur with wettable acres determination done 05/17/07 per Doug Niemond.
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-08-2012 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1217
l
12.52
2.90
N/A
Gilead
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.2 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.2 Tons
1481
4
9.73
7.20
NIA
Blanton
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
1 4.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 22.25 10.10
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/8/2012
PCs Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Sail Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
FeM
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
Ions
1217
1
S5
Gilead
12,52
2.90
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.2 Tons
311-9/30
219
0
0
Irrig.
219
87.48
0.00
253.69
0.00
1217
1
S5
Gilead
12,52
2.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
*100
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00
57.92
0.00
1481
4
S5
Blanton
9.73
7.20
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
3/1-9130
215
0
0
brig.
215
85.88
0.00
618.34
0.00
1481
4
S5
Blanton
9.73
7.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
•100
0
0
Irrig.
1 50
19,97
0.00
143.80
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,073.74
__ -'
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
733.44
Balance, 1000 gallons
-340.30
Total Applied, tons
Total Produced, tons
;Yn
W..
0.00
Balance, tonsz
x
0.04
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/8/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1217
1
S5
Gilead
12.52
2.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
*100
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0,00
57.92
0.00
1217
1
S5
Gilead
12.52
2.90
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.2 Tons
3/1-9130
219
0
0
Irrig.
219
87.48
0.00
253.69
0.00
1481
4
S5
Blanton
9.73
7.20
Small Grain Overseed
--
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
*100
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0
143.80
0.00
1481
4
S5
Blanton
9.73
7.20
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
T.5 Tons
3/1-9130
215
0
0
Irrig.
215
85.88
0.00
618.34
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,073.741'`_
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
733.44
sz
Balance, 1000 gallons
-340.30
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
7.zM
0.00
Balance, tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/8/2012 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1217
1
Gilead
0.35
1.0
1481
1 4
1131anton
0.75
11.0
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/8/2012 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Sails containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
9.77
19.55
29.32
Hay 6 Ion R.Y.E.
300
26.32
4.89
9.77
14.66
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
9.16
18.33
27.49
-------------------------------- •------------------•-----------------------•----•---•--------------------------•-•------------------------- - •--
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-08-2012 Sludge Page Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is .
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name I Swine Nursea Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 11/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
.1
89
1
2
61
1
3
95
1
4
130
1
5
164
I
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
2
1
88
2
2
110
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
---- -- ------ • - --
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-08-2012
---------------------------------------------
Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the Geld (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/8/2012 Specification Page 1

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-- -------- ---------------- -------------- -- - ----- ---- -
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/8/2012 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21, Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
- --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- --
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/8/2012 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
-------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - ----- - - --
547414 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-08-2012 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- -
5474t4 Database Version 3.1 bate Printed: 02-08-2012 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

Waste Utilization Plan
Producer:
Jeffrey Thornton
Name of Farm:
Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Location.,
949 Thornton Rd
Newton Grove, N.C. 2a366
Phone:
919-369-6566
Type of Operation:
Wean -Feeder
Number of Animal:
5536
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic lagoon
Method of Application.
Irrigation
Amount of waste produced per year.
Amount of plant available N (PAN) producedlyear.
County: Johnston
2337 tonlyear
2657 Ibs,lyear
The waste From your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in the implemen.ting your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally
safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize_
2. Soil types are important as they have different infrltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year_ Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are
established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may in runoff to the surface waters which is not
allowed under DWO regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crops production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different applications methods are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which
�'d 17L00690i,6
se01AJe0V Nolrrueg dtij7:90 Z 6 90 AeiN

Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Page 2
could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving
waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and the crop type.
dime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This
waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Yield/AC
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N
Used
Month to
I
Los. N
Per Ac.
3688
H1
BnA
CB -Grazed
3.3
48
2.29
363
MAR-SEPT
158
3688
H1
BnA
SG
1
5o
2.29
115
SEPT-MAR
50
3688
H2
BnA
CB -Grazed
3.3
48
2.64
418
MAR-SEPT
158
3688
H2
BnA
SG
1
50
2.54
132
SEPT-MAR
60
3688
H3
BnA
C&Grazed
3.3
48
3.W
475
MAR-SEPT
158
3688
H3
BnA
SG
1
510
3.00
150
SEPT-MAR
50
3688
H4
SnA
CB -Grazed
3.3
48
2.93
464
MAR-SEPT
158
3688
H4
BnA
SG
1
50
2.93
147
SEPT-MAR
50
3688
H5
BnA
CB -Grazed
3.3
48
2.73
432
MAR-SEPT
158
3688
H5
BnA
SG
1
50
2,73
137
SEPT-MAR
50
4175
H6
SoA
C15-Hay
5.4 1
49
2.36
624
MAR-SEPT
265
4175
H6
BoA
SG
1
50
2.36
118
SEPT-MAR
50
4175
H7
BOA
GEl-Hay
5.4
49
1.54
407
MAR-SEPT
265
4176
H7
BoA
SG
1
50
1-541
77
SEPT-MAR
50
4175
H8
UcB
Com
fig
1.22
1.43
120
Feb15-Jun
84
4175
H8
UCB
Wheat
34
2.32
1.43
113
SEPT-MAR
80
4175
H8
UcB
Soybeans
25
3.98
1.43
142
Junl-Se t15
98
4179
S1
BnA
CB -Ha
4.4
48
0.51
108
MAR-SEPT
212
4179
S1
BnA
SG
1
50
0.51
26
SEPT-MAR
50
4179
S2
BnA
CE-Hay
4.4
48
0.06
139
MAR-SEPT
212
4179
S2
SnA
SG
1
50
0.66
33
SEPT-MAR
50
4179
S3
BnA
GB -Hay
4.4
48
1.32
279
MAR-SEPT
212
4179
S3
BnA
SG
1
50
1.32
66
SEPT-MAR
50
4179
S4
BnA
CB -Hay
4.4
48
1.15
243
MAR-SEPT
212
4179
S4
BnA
SG
1
50
1 1.15
58
SEPT-MAR
50
4179
S5
BnA
GB -Hay
4.4
48
0.63
133
MAR-SEPT
212
4179
S5
BnA
SG
1
50
0.63
32
SEPT-MAR
50
4179
S6
BnA
CB -Hay
4.4
48
0.59
125
MAR-SEPT
212
4179-1-S6
BnA
SG
1
50
0.59
301
SEPT-MAR
1 50
Total 25.21 5706 lbs.
Available Nitrogen 2657 lbs.
Surplus or deficit -3049 lbs.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big jots. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply
the waste in a timely manner.
td bL0069016
Se01/UeS5V �01AUee dt�b:90 Z 1 90 )aiN

rr
Jeffrey Thornton Farm Page 3
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be' over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that
addresses all nutdants. This place only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc. interseeded in ibermudagrass), forage must be removed through
grazing, hay and for silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a height of six to nine
inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc. is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small grain to reach materity,
especially late in the season ( i.e. April or May) Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will
definitely interfere with the stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result.in reduced yields and less
nitrogen being utilized, Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is the normal
situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or silage
two to three times during the season, depending on the time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October . Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Berrnudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a height of about two inches before drilling for best
results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filters strips along
ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to
equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste_
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates.
The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients
or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 399 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge.
If you remove sludge every 5 years you will have approximately 1993 lbs. of PAN to utilize. Assuming
you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 lbs/acre you will need 7
acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 lbs. of nitrogen per acre you will need 16
acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estmates of the PAN and the land needed. Actual
requirements could vary by 25% depending on the sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
application methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that
runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity
9-d VL0069016 s901A1es6V NIOINueq d6t,:90 Z I. 90 JaW

M
Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Page 4
of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available_ nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of
the crop,
if surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and
irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to property irrrigate the acres shown in tables.
Failure to apply the recommended rates and amlounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
The. following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts_
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Applic.
Rate inlhr
Applic.
Amount
3688
H1
BnA
CB -Grazed
. 0.5
1
3688
H1
BnA
SG
0.6
1
3688
H2
BnA
CB -Grazed
0.5
1
3688
H2
BnA
SG
0.5
1
3688
H3
BnA
CB -Grazed
0.5
1
3688
H3
BnA
SG
0.5
1
3688
H4
BnA
CB -Grazed
0.5
1
3688
H4
BnA
SG
0.5
1
3688
H5
BnA
CB -Grazed
0.5
1
3688
H5
BnA
SG
0.5
1
4175
H6
BoA
CB -Hay
0.5
1
4175
H6
BoA
SG
0.5
1
4175
H7
BoA
CB -Hay
0.5
1
4175
H7
BoA
SG
0.5
1
4175
H8
Uc8
Corn
0.5
1
4175
HS
UcB
Wheat
11.5
1
4175
H8
UcB
Soybeans
0.5
1
4179
S1
BnA
CB -Hay
0.5
1
4179
S1
BnA
SG
0.5
1
4179
S2
BnA
C13-Hay
0.5
1
4179
S2
BnA
SG
0.5
1
4179
S3
BnA
CB -Hay
0.5
1
4179
53
BnA
SG
0.5
1
4179
S4
BrA
CB -Hay
0.5
1
4179
S4
BnA
SG
0.5
1
4179
S5
BnA
--C8--HaV
0.5
1
4179
S5
BnA
0.5
1
4179
S6
BnA
*SGa
0.5
1
4179
S6
BnA
0.5
1
9,d bL0069016 db5:90ZL90jeW

Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Page S
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the sail assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the
crop is not over applied. In many situations the appliicaEon amount shown cannot be applied because of the
nitrogen limitations. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 6 months. In no instances should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and the waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated
properly to apply the correct rates shown in the tables. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you have receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to appling the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Z-d VL00690 �6 se0ities15V NOI Jee d69:90 Z 1, 90 asW

Jeffrey Thornton Farm Page 6
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply waste. It the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landownerwho'is within a reasonable proximity, allowing himiherthe
use of the land for waste application: It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shalt be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
standard 393 - Filter Strip).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate that runoff
does not occur offske or to the surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
a. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potentual for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients, Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11, Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residenrial property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
g-d tIL006901.6 se01AJ$S6V r1MJ88 d90'90 Z i. 90 aeW

Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Page 7
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 1 DO feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned
by he landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialisf'_
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways. waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegtation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidences of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is tic be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implerhenting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illigal discharge, pollution and erosion.
18. Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetation and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and the bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22_ Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
6'd bL0069066 se01nres6VNI01 Ueg dgt;g0ZI, goaeA

Page a
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement Jeffrey Thornton
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance proce-
dures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
before the new animals are stocked_ I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to the surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour
storm.The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm affice and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Faci4ity Owner_ Jeffrey Thomton
Signature: DahiQ
Name of Manager (If different from owner)
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: James L. Lamb
Affiliation: Prestage Farms, Inc, Phone: [phone]
Address: P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
a
Signature: C1�� p�-'
Date: /,a - N-o10
0L'd VL0069OL6 se01naes6v�p1mie8 dt,L:90ZI.90aen

NCDUCS.Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site, wvw-ncagr,gov/agronome/
Report No: 19377
�e
Grower:
Thornton,
Jeffery
Copies To:
Barwick, Curtis
�,.
09 Thornton Rd
-
Newton
Grove, NC 28366
=J.
a Test Report-f;o
Faf1)T:
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Received: 11/30/2011
Completed: 12/28/2011 Links to Helpful Information
Johnston County
Agronomist Comments
l z
Field Information
-Appfeed Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
L
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas M
0
IM220
0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
12
2nd Crap: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
IW220
0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I Zn-Al
Ca-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.32
1.29 6.6 91.0 0.6 7.3 297 256
57.0 15.0
99
57
57
1308
1308
287
27
0.3
Field Information
Led Lime
APP
Reoommendations =-
Sample No, Last Crop
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zu
B Mn
See Note
2
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas M
AT
180-220
0
160-180
0
0
0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas M
0
I80-220
0
160-180
0
0
0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Ma-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 IV03 N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.41
1.38 5.1 73.0 i A 5.8 308 27
55.0 15.0
117
87
87
543
543
422
30
0.1
Field Information.
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
3
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas M
0
IW220
0
100-120
0
0
0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
100-120
0
0
0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Ca-1
S 1
SS-1 NO3-N AWN
Na
MIN 0.51
1.38 6.1 77.0 1.4 6.0 385 49
59.0 14.0
156
111
111
1016
1016
732
30
0.1
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory4nformation-management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
tE _1
�." Thank you jor using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Pbone: 019j733-2655 Web site: avWW.ncagr.gov/agronmmi/
-
Report No- 17789
<<irc,e
�µ
Grower.'
Thornton, Jeffery
Copies To:
BaMck, Curlis
n
',.
949 Thomtan Rd
_= x
F
Newton
Grove, NC 28366
oil Test Report
Farm. -
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Received: 11/19/2010
Completed: 12/22/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Johnston Counly
Agronomist Comments
_
12
Feeldlafbrmation
........
__ lied Lime
DPP_
Recomnmendattons : _
-
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
KaO
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
I
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas M
0
180-220
0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cn-I
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N
Na
THIN 0,46
1.32 5.1 96.0 0.2 7.7 290 249
56.0 15.0
t04
54
54
841
841
238
28
0.4
Field Information
Applied:Lime
Recommendations::
-
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
2
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
AT
180-220
0
130-150
0
0
0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/pas,M
0
180-220
0
130-150
0
0
0
0
0
t2
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I IGI
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Ma-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N MI4-N
No
MIN 0.36
1.32 4.7 87.0 0.6 6.3 333 40
63.0 19.0
124
84
84
672
672
547
36
0.1
Field Information:
Applied Lime
.
Rminmendations
-
"
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Line
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
3
1st Crap: Berm Hay/Pas,M
.5T
180-220
0
120-140
0
0
0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/PasA
0
180-220
0
120-140
0
0
0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
AWN
Na
MIN 0.04
1.31 5.7 88.0 0.7 6.3 278 44
67A 16.0
125
84
84
1318
1318
959
40
0.1
North Carolina
A— :±
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission
Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-rnanagement system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxter, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomip-1kvisioti,).iPMne::(919)733=2655 Web site: www.acagr.gov/agronoffii/l
?rs !":r '" rf,
i
Report No: 17789
`.
Grower
Thornton, Jeffery
949 Thomtan Rd
Copies TO:
Barwick, Curtis
_
Newton Grove, NC 28366
l
Soil Test
Report
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
FQriil.
Received: 11/19/2010
Completed: 12/22/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Johnston County
Agronomist Comments
L'1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Cn
Zn
B Mn
See Note
1
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220 0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
i2
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220 0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac PH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Affl)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn4 Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N N714-N
Na
MIN 0.46
1.32 5.1 96.0 0.2 7.7 290 249
56.0
15.0
104 54
54
841
841
238
28
0.4
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
2
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
AT
180-220 0
130-150
0
0
0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
0
180-220 0
130-150
0
0
0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC HS% Ac PH P-I K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N
No
MIN 0.36
1.32 4.7 87.0 0.6 6.3 333 40
63.0
19.0
124 84
84
672
672
547
36
0.1
Fieldlnformation
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
3
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
5T
I80-220 0
120-140
0
0
0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/pas,M
0
IM220 0
120-140
0
0
0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V GEC BS% Ac PH P I K I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(I)
Mn-AI(2)
I�Zn-Al :&_1-
S-I
SS-1 NO3 N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.04
1.31 5.7 8&0 0.7 6.3 278 44
67.0
16.0
125 84
84
1318
1318
959 1
40
0.1
North Carolina
1
Tobacco Trust Fund Comrnismon
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly waves Perdue
Governor
Jeffrey Thornton
.Jeffrey Thornton Farm
949 Thornton Rd
Newton Grove, NC 29366
Dear Jeffrey Thornton:
Division of Water Quality
�oieen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director f ;.; Secretary
February 26, 2010 }
MAR 3
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No, AWS510106
Jeffrey Thornton Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with•y6ur change of ownership request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Jeffrey Thornton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Jeffrey Thornton Farm, located in Johnston County, with a swine animal capacity
of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: 5536 Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS510106 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the °
record keeping, and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2725 Capital Blvd., Raleigrr. Norm Carolina 27604 Q11� L,
Pnone:919-733-3221 ! rAY 919-715-0588 t Cusiomer Service 1-877-523-5748 NOrt�lCarolina
Intemet: wwvd nmateraualitvorq
.An Equal 09ocruniry % Afruma0ve �zrian Empiovzr
s

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable,, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erli.nola.i!ov/erirah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
fur Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS510,106)
AFO Notebooks
Prestage Farms, Inc.

o�0� W A r�9QG
_CIO
>
John Thornton
Thornton Swine 1-4
731 West Darden Road
Clinton NC 28328
Dear John Thornton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 5, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to John
Thornton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510106 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Thornton Swine 1-4, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 5536 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are.authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Marl Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarohna
Naturally

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff .member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department .
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510106
APS Central Files

1
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
DESIGNATION FORM
A_NDVIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: _ J�/'� (� county:
OPERATOR IN CHARGE J
Home Mailing Address _- _-� �tio•� !�— l-C------ - - --
City fjt"Y. v State /a%C— Zip
Certificate # 9 0- sro Social Security # S 3-- Y I L I
Work Phone-20 Home Phone �l/mil 3L9__-Ls L E
Signature-L. w,N 2�6vsy,' Date y - /S= /o
BACKUP OPERATOR (Optional):
Home Mailing Address
Cite.
State Zip
Certificate #_ Social Security #
Work Phone Home Phone
Signature Date
OWNER..__.. 1 -C f14,,
Mailing Address_ I Y I. _7cal City- /I%��
State :lc- Z' 61 Telephone#
Signature Date.
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618
Z-d trL00690 L6 S931mes6y �Olmjse dgb:g0 Z l 90 ieA

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Thornton Swine 1-4
John Robert Thornton
731 West Darden Road
Clinton, NC 28328
800-949-4647
10-21-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-568-
Dev oper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I Have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
a 2! 3
ignature {owner} Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 10'�; G 3
T hniW Specialist Signature Da e
w
U
.
c3
r r^ �7 r
484737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-21-2003 Cover Page t ciz`
c
Q r;�
RECEIVED / DENR 1 DWQ 1
Aquifer Protection+ Section Y; T
MAR 21 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,057,376 gals/year by a
5,536 animal Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
2437
Incorporated
4185
Injected
4609
Irrigated
2649
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
6,639
2,611,241
-1,553,865
Year 2
6,651
2,615,808
-1,558,432
Note: In source ID, S means standard source. U means user defined source.
484737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-21-2003 Source Page 1 of I

I
Narrative
REVISED ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN:
FACILITY NUMBER 51-106
FARM NAME: THORNTON SWINE 1-4
OWNER NAME: JOHN ROBERT THORNTON
DESIGN CAPACITY: 5536 WEAN TO FEEDER
THIS WASTE PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE PERMANENT PLAN CREATED FOR THIS FARM
ON 4/30/98 BY TECHNICAL SPECIALIST CHRIS W. SMITH OF THE NRCS SMITHFIELD
OFFICE.
THIS OPERATION WAS ORIGINALLY CERTIFIED WITH DWQ TO BE A 2000 FEEDER TO
FINISH OPERATION WITH A STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT OF 270,000 LBS.
BY WAY OF THIS NARRATIVE JOHN ROBERT THORNTON WOULD LIKE TO CONVERT HIS
2000 FEEDER TO FINISH OPERATION TO A 5536 WEAN TO FEEDER OPERATION TO
COMPRISE THE NEW FOLLOWING BREAKDOWN:
2000 FEEDER TO FINISH * 135 LBS PEWHEAD = 270,000 LBS SSLW
5536 WEAN TO FEEDER * 30 LBS PERIHEAD = 166,080 LBS SSLW
REDUCTION OF SSLW = 103,920 LBS
THERE IS ADEQUATE STORAGE IN LAGOONS TO ACCOMMODATE THIS CONVERSION.
THE LAGOON SYSTEM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A TWO -STAGE LAGOON. THERE IS
WELL OVER ENOUGH LAND AVAILABLE WITHOUT TAKING THE 25% REDUCTION THAT
IS ALLOWED ON TWO -STAGED SYSTEMS.
DUE TO THE DEFICIT NOTED IN THIS PLAN IT IS PERMISSIBLE FOR THE LEASED LANDS
TO GROW COTTON IN PLACE OF CORN TO CREATE A CORN WHEAT SOYBEAN
ROTATION. IF COTTON IS USED IT WILL HAVE AN AGRONOMIC UPTAKE OF 66 POUNDS
PER ACRE AND AN APPLICATION WINDOW OF MAY-JUN. FURTHERMORE NONE OF THE
CROPLAND NOTED IN THIS PLAN IS NEED TO FULFILL THE AGRONOMIC REQUIREMENTS
OF THIS FARM; THERFORE, FLEXIBILITY OF CROPS WILL EXIST FOR THE CROPLAND. IF
ANY OTHER CROP IS APPLIED IT WILL NEED AN APPLICATION WINDOW AND AN
AGRONOMIC RATE ASSIGNED BY A TECH SPEC.
THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN
THE CALCULATION TABLES.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR.
THORNTON PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC
WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
494737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-21-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 2

Narrative
3/12/01 3/12/01
RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR. JOHN ROBERT THORNTON
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST OWNER/OPERATOR
484737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-21-2003 Narrative Page 2 of 2

C
C
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this•operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper tinning of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on
each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total
manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each he
cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres I
CroD
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
I Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manur
Applie
(Field
N
N
I N
lbs/A
1000
al/A I
tons
1000 als
tons
3688
pulls l-
S5
Blanton
16.5
13.6
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/15-3/15
50
0
0
Irrig_
50
19.96
0
271.26
0.
3688
pulls 1-
S5
Blanton
16.5
13.6
Hybrid Bermudagrass
May
4.5
Tons
3/1-10115
`225
0
0 1
Irrig.
225
89.82
0
1.220.66
0.
-4175
pulls 6-
S5
Bonneau
5.0
3.9
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons -
10115-3/15
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.96
0
77.94
0.
--4175
pulls 6-
S5
Bonneau
5.0
3.9
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
5.5
Tons
3/1-10115
269
0
0
lrrig.
269
107.39
0
418.80
0.
-4175
3 pull 8
S5
Uchee
5.0
2.9
Corn, Grain
70.0
Bushels
2/15-6/30
•88
0
20
Irrig.
68
27.15
0
77.64
0.
-4175
3 pull 8
S5
Uchee
5.01
2.9
Wheat, Grain
35.0
Bushels
911-3131
41
0
0
Irrig.
41
16.17
0
46.241
0,
4179
1
S5
Blanton
8.1
4.9
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/15-3/15
50
0
0
inia.
50
11.98
0
58.68
0.
4179
1
S5
Blanton
8.1
4.9
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
4.5
Tons
3/1-10/15
'225
0
0
In'ig.
225
89.82
0
440.12
0.
484737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10/21/03 WUT Page 1
rv.

Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
AcreI
Use.
Acres
CroD
RYE
RYE
Unit
Apvlic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(ibs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manta
Applie
(Field
N
N
I N
Ljh9AallA
1000
tons
1000 Ms
tons
0.
Balance, tons 1
0.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
484737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10/21/03 WUT Page 2
W.

Tract
Field
Source
.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Cron
RYE
RYE
I Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitroeen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
I Avvlic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
{Field)
Solid
Manur
Applie
(Field
N
N
N
lbs!
1400
al/A
ton
100 als
tans
3688
pulls 1-
S5
Blanton
16.5
13.6
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/15-3115
SD
0
0
Irrig.
50
1996
0
271.26
0.
3688
pulls I-
S5
Blanton
16.5
13.6
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Ha
4.5
Tons
3/1-10/13
•225
0
0
irrig.
225
89.82
0
1,220.66
0.
-4175
pulls 6-
S5
Bonneau
5.0
3.9
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10115-3I15
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.96
0
77.94
0.
4175
pulls 6-
S5
Bonneau
5.0
3.9
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Ha
5.5
Tons
3/1-10/15
269
0
0
irrig.
269
107.39
0
418.80
0.
--4175
3 pull 8
S5
Uchee
5.0
2.9
Wheat, Grain
35.0
Bushels
9/1-3/31
41
0
0
Irrig,
41
16,17
01
46.24
0.
--4175
3 pull 8
S5
Uchee
5.0
2.9
Soybeans, Double CM
25.0
Bushels
6/1-9/15
072
0
0
IrriR.
72
28.74
0
82.20
0.
4179
1
S5
Blanton
8.1
4.9
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/15-3/15
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
11.98
0
58.68
0.
4179
1
S5
Blanton
8A
4.9
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Ha
4.5
Tons
3/1-10/15
1*225
0
0
Trig.
225
89.82
0
440.12
0.
L.
0.
Balance, tons
0.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data-
. . ._..,._.__ __ ____ __
484737 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10/21/03 WUT Page 3

o�°� w a Z r�RPG
3
rb-
� - - i
oNii;�Uamkw-r
John Thornton
Thornton Swine 14
731 West Darden Road
Clinton NC 28328
Dear John Thornton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date -of the -Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG 100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division -will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 5, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to John
Thornton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWGI00000. The issuance of this COG
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510106 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Thornton Swine 14, located in.Johnston.County,.with an.animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 5536 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean *or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004.7 Ptirsuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above),will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. AM
NMEIk
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result ,in the revocation of this COG or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 571=4700.' 'If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510106
NDPU Files _._ ..

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality .
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 24, 2001
JOHN THORNTON
THORNTON SWINE 1-4
731 WEST DARDEN ROAD
CLINTON NC 28328
1 • •
NORTH CAROLIN DEPARTMENT OF
EWIRON MENT�-ANp, NATURAL�RESOURGES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear John Robert Thornton:
1n accordance with your application received on March 21, 2001, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to John Thornton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Thornton Swine 1-4, located in Johnston County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 5536 Wean to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003 and shall hereby void COC
No. AWS510106 dated February 5, 1999. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specified
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and
required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require
a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Stephanie Milam at [phone] ext. 544.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh-Regi,onal,_Office Water Quality,Sectionf
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

AGRIMENT SERVICES INC.
P.O. BOX 1096
BEUI.AVILLE, NC28518
TEL [phone]
Mrs. Sue Homewood
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Application No. AWS510106
Dear Mrs. Homewood,
Enclosed is a conversion package for John Robert Thornton. Per this memo he would
officially like to convert his,2440 Feeder to Finish operation to a 5536 Wean to Feeder
operation. All documents to finalize this request are enclosed for your review.
If you have any further questions please give us a call.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services Inc.,
CC. John Robert Thornton
Johnston S WCD

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Thondon Swine 1-4
John Robert 7honiton
731 West Darden Road
Clinton, NC 28328
800-949-4647
03-12-2001
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Semites, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulcwille, NC 28518
252-56 - 48
/ I 2tAK
D eloper Signat re
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 11N
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------- - ---------- --- - -- - ------------- -- - - ----------------- - -
829557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Cover Page 1

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
177orntan Swine 1-4
John Robert Thornton
731 West Darden Road
Clinton, NC 28328
800-919-4647
03-12-2001
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy .Ir.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-56 - 48
D ,eloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
., d
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 3 /•Z/o
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
829-557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generate 057,376 als/year by a
5,536 animal Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facili has waste storage capacities of n2roximatell 180 da s.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
2437
Incorporated
4185
Injected
4609
Irrigated
2649
Actual plied
Year 1
5925
Year 2
5890
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Da 829557 tabase Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Source Page 1

Narrative
REVISED ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN:
FACILITY NUMBER 51-106
FARM NAME: THORNTON SWINE 14
OWNER NAME: JOHN ROBERT THORNTON
DESIGN CAPACITY: 5536 WEAN TO FEEDER
THIS WASTE PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE PERMANENT PLAN CREATED FOR THIS FARM
ON 4/30/98 BY TECHNICAL SPECIALIST CHRIS W. SMITH OF THE NRCS SMITHFIELD
OFFICE.
THIS OPERATION WAS ORIGINALLY CERTIFIED WITH DWQ TO BE A 2000 FEEDER TO
FINISH OPERATION WITH A STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT OF 270,000 LBS.
BY WAY OF THIS NARRATIVE JOHN ROBERT THORNTON WOULD LIKE TO CONVERT HIS
2000 FEEDER TO FINISH OPERATION TO A 5536 WEAN TO FEEDER OPERATION TO
COMPRISE THE NEW FOLLOWING BREAKDOWN:
2000 FEEDER TO FINISH * 135 LBS PER/HEAD = 270,000 LBS SSLW
5536 WEAN TO FEEDER * 30 LBS PER/HEAD = 166,080 LBS SSLW
REDUCTION OF SSLW = 103,920 LBS
THERE IS ADEQUATE STORAGE IN LAGOONS TO ACCOMMODATE THIS CONVERSION.
THE LAGOON SYSTEM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A TWO -STAGE LAGOON. THERE IS
WELL OVER ENOUGH LAND AVAILABLE WITHOUT TAKING THE 25% REDUCTION THAT
IS ALLOWED ON TWO -STAGED SYSTEMS.
DUE TO THE DEFICIT NOTED IN THIS PLAN IT IS PERMISSIBLE FOR THE LEASED LANDS
TO GROW COTTON IN PLACE OF CORN TO CREATE A CORN WHEAT SOYBEAN
ROTATION. IF COTTON IS USED IT WILL HAVE AN AGRONOMIC UPTAKE OF 66 POUNDS
PER ACRE AND AN APPLICATION WINDOW OF MAY-JUN. FURTHERMORE NONE OF THE
CROPLAND NOTED IN THIS PLAN IS NEED TO FULFILL THE AGRONOMIC REQUIREMENTS
OF THIS FARM; THERFORE, FLEXIBILITY OF CROPS WILL EXIST FOR THE CROPLAND. IF
ANY OTHER CROP IS APPLIED IT WILL NEED AN APPLICATION WINDOW AND AN
AGRONOMIC RATE ASSIGNED BY A TECH SPEC.
THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN
THE CALCULATION TABLES.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IR TED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING D REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR.
THORNTON PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC
WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
3/12/01 ❑❑❑❑❑❑3/12/01 ❑❑
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
829557 Database Version 1.0. Date Printed: 03-12-2001, Narrative Page I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper
timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the
nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited
so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Conun.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
I
Res.
(ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
ibs/A
1000
l/A
UXIS
1000 Is
tons
3688
3ulls 1-
S5
Blanton
16.5
13.6
all Grans OverseedV85.0,&3ushels.
•10/15-3115
50
0
0
brig
50
20.0
0.0
271.3
0.0
368$
ulls 1-
S5
Blanton
16.5
13.6
uda ss Hay
•3/1-10l15
* 225
0
0
Irri
225
99.9
0.0
1,220.7
0.0
-4175
ulis 6-
S5
Bonneau
5.0
3.9
orn, Grain
ls
2/15-6130
104
0
20
Im
84
33.5
0.0
130.8
0.0
--4175
ulls6-
S5
Bonneau
5.0
3.9
eat, Grain
ls
9/1-3/31
/ 52
0
0
I"'52
20.8
0.0
81.0
0.0
-•4175
pull 8
SS
Udiee
5.0
2.9
om, Grad
ls
2/15-6/30
" 88
0
20
brig,
68
27.1
0.0
77.G
0.0
-4175
pull 8
SS
Uchee
5.0
2.9
cat, Grain
els
9/1-3/3l
41
0
0
Irrig.
41
16.2
0.0
46.2
0.0
4179
1
SS
Blanton
8.1
4.9
mall Grain Overseed•
10115-3115
50
0
0
Irri
50
l Z.0
0.0
5971
0.0
----------------- --- ------------- ----- ----
829557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 WUT Page l

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Trad
Field
Source
I.U.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Cr
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
R,4d
Comm.
Fart.
Nutrient
Applied
Ices.
(lbslA)
N
Applic,
McOwd,
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Alanure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs+A
1000
l",
toms
1000 ol,
tins
4179
1
SS
Blanton
8.l
4.9
uda ass t3a
4.5
Tons
•3l1-10115
' 225
0
0
Im
225
89.8
0.0
440.1
0.0
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied 1000 gallons
2,326
Tatai Pmduetid. 1000 gallons
1.057
Balance 1000 llons
-1.269
Manure Solids
Total AppliedL tans
0
Total Produced, tons
0
Balance. tons
0
Notes: 1. In the tract colunm, symbol means leased, otherwise, Dotted. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
------------------- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
829557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
1.1).
Soil Scries
'Dotal
Acre
Use.
Acres
Ca
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen-
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs1A)
N
Appiic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Nimnrre
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Mitnure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manart
Applicri
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
UVA
toms
1000 Rals
tons
3688
ulls 1-
95
Blanton
16.5
13.6
ntall Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
*10115-3/15
r/ 50
0
0
brig.
50
20.0
0.0
271.3
0.0
3688
ells 1-
S5
Blanton
I6.5
13.6
mdagrass Hay
4.5
'ons
*311-10/15
"t/ 225
0
0
Irrig.
225
89.8
0.0
1,220.7
0.0
-4175
iulls 6-
S5
Botmeau
5.0
3.9
eat, Grain
45.W
Bushels
911-3/31
52
0
0
Irrig,
52
20.8
0.0
81.0
0.0
--4175
iulls 6-
S5
Bomeau
5.0
3.9
"ybeans, Double Crop
25,
ushels
*611-9/15
* 72
0
0
Irrip,
72
29.7
0.0
112.1
0.0
--4175pull
8
1 S5
Uchee
3.0
2.9
eat, Grain
35.0
usltels
9/1-3/31
41
0
0
Irrig
41
16.2
0.0
46.2
0.0
-4175
3 pull 8
S5
uchce
5.0
2.9
oybeans, Double Crop
25.
Bushels
*611-9/15
' 72
0
0
Irrig.
72
28.7
0.0
82.2
0.0
4179
1
85
Blanton
8.1
4.9
'mall Grain o erseed
M
['ons
*10/15-3/15
50
0
0
brig
50
12.0
0.0
58.7
0.0
4t79
11
SS
1131anton
8.I
4.9
icrrmrda assHa y
4.50
Tons
*3/1-10/15
• 225
0
0
Irri
225
89.8
0.0
440.1
0.0
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2.312
Taal Produced, 1000 tllais
1.057
Balance, 1000 Pilk4is
-1,255
Manure Solids
"rotai App lied, tons
0
Taal Produced, tons
0
l3alanec. toms
I
0
Notes: 1. in the tract column, symbol -means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
-- ----- --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -----------------------
829557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 WUT Page 3

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates
shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a
concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 ORMac
Minimum Acres
-Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
I5 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
1 1501
13.161
14.091
28.191
42.427
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
7.05
14.09
21.14
soybean 40 bu
1 1601
14,041
13.211
26.421
39.63
------------------------------•---------------------------------------------•---------------------- ------- --------------------------
329557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Sludge Page 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility, if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,
this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available
storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume
of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste
utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 1 9115
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
106
1
2
117
1
3
157
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
ISO
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
167
2
1
158
2
2
173
2
3
180
2
4
ISO
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180'
2
9
180
2
10
180
2
11
173
2
12
151
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- --------------
829557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Capacity Page 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- -----------------
8?9557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Specification Page 1

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following. The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- —:-----------------
929557 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Specification Pa e 2

16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
o`vner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker tivill be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9>j7 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Specification Page 3

metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
$29»7 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1 pulls I-
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (I.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply I80 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1 pulls 1-
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10%when planting no till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2 pulls 6-, 3 pull 8
Com: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations
should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till.
Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When
planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted
practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 Ibs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and one-half the
remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040 days after emergence. The
total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the
recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at.planting. Plant samples
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ ---- ---------------------- ------ --------
829557 Database Version 1.0 Date Printed: 03-12-2001 Crop Note Page 1

can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the com, Timely
management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2 pulls 6-, 3 pull 8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth
should be 1-I 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2 pulls 6-, 3 pull 8
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be plantedfrom October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash
recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied
during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of
diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
829557 Database Version LG Date Printed: 03-12-2001 CropNote Page 2

PX111131f D-2
TABLE 2 — Traveling Irrigation Ginn Settings JOHN R013ERT TIIORNTON
Makes Model and Type of Equipnlerlk 82AT820, 820' xl .75 HOSE:; SR-100 GUN, .7 T NOZ, 70 PSI, 120 GPM, 275' DIMIETER
Field Nol.
and
IIydnnt Not
Travel
Speed
0`1/min)
Application
Rile
(Mir)
TRAVEL LINE
Elfeelive Ef &dive
Width (0) Lenglh (It)
Wetted
Diameter
(feel)
rQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Noule Gperating dperaring
Diameter P(CULre Pressure Art
(inches) A Gun (psi) 0 Reel (psi) Pat1em3
Commenus
111
2.75
,/ l_S
220
410
275'
.7
70
90.66
340
2107
2.29
112
00
420
"
.,
to
„
340/222
1
93 ,4
113
of
of
650
It
Is
Is
is
340
2
98 A 00
E14
so
�/ ,�
590
Is
to
,a
IN
2
71
115
"
650
of
to
go
2198
a. 73
116
„
✓ „
at
545
10
of
it
It
10
215
117
of
✓
210
300
if
Is
,1
„
If
1.44
/ 4
220
700
If
,1
Is
It
3.
4 --�. In
20.15
IffnED ACRES
ISce nitached mop.
2Sltow separate entries for each hydrant locution in ench field.
3USe the following abbreviations for various arc patterns-. f (full circle), TQ (Ihree 1luarlers), Tr (hvo Ihir&), I I (half circle), T (nne third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc. -
NRCS, NC
s�t}•�• ear:

TABLE d - Irrigation System Specifications JOIN ROBERT T1IORNTON
Truveling _
lrrf nllnn Gun
Solid SO
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gran)
120
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
110.96
Design Precipitation Rate (ln/hr)
-35.z-5-
lltnc Length (feet)
320x2.75
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
-CIIANICAL
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
. GINE
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
20.36
TABLES - T1lnist Melt Specifications[
Deslpner mnv nrnvlde thrust hlarle dclnitt gin tenarale theet-
LOCATION
-
TIIRIIST BLOCK
AltrA (sq. R.)
91}° llend
fit„
_ 2.5
Dend find
4"
1 .5
Tee
4"
1 .5
150
4"
1.5
t5ce USDA Field Oil ice IechIlic ll t1iCie. Seeliull IV, IIFICIice Calc 430-DI).
USE TABLE I
THRUS7� 111MUNC
IiXlffnrr DA
USE 1.200 FOR SOIL— BEKARINC STRENGM1 NRCS, NC
ll1NE. 1996

TRAVEL SYSTEM
Narrative oflrrigation System- Operation
Descnbe the operation of the- system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as starr-up; shut -dowry, winterization and regular maintenance: of all equipment-
Irrtgailon Parameters USaA.VHCS
oCotler 1995 page-i Nonh Cirotina

'
I
1
- •4 I 1
t i
1 �
;`;�i � .x ►l. 1 .j � it �

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name:
IOHN ]ZOItI-117 'I'IH)Wl'f)N
Address: ' 0 BOX 2 5 731 lJ DAIM N IZi)
W-Hl'ON CIZOVE NC 28366
Telephone: (910)i64-6945/594-0581
TABLE I - Field Specifications '
County: s D•
Date:
Field
Number"
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Fleld'
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(11.)
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
hate "I•
(inthr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
(Inches)'
Comments
f36nA
I
z3
I Ai, -Dui • Sec
Iare,
a-,
, !/C
—t,
O o- f —Ooe APN e
/ UH
OCR
rr .J
6
'Table to be completed in its entirely by Feld Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field local]on(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to WC. Irrigallon Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section 11 G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Irrigation Parameters ' USDA -MRCS
October 1995 page-1 NOW1 Carolina

'T'^M CROCKETT IRRIGATION, INC. • P.O. BOX 390 • WILLIAMSTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27892 0 919-792-3121
J'OI N ROBERT THORNTON
P 0 BOX 245
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366
SOLID SET
SPRINKLER
7025 RD SPRINKLER, 1/4 NOZZLE;
60 PSI,
135' DIAMETER, 14/2 GPM
SPACING
60% x 135 = 81; USE 80'
APPLICATION
96.3 x 14.2 1367.46 -
FULL CIRCLE
RATE
.21
80 x 80 6407-.21
x 31Ta = .42 .21
x 3m
_ .28
TDH
620' 4" PR-160 PVC PIPE @ 142
GPM, :43
PER 100,
2.67
4" & 2" LATERAL, W/9 SPRINKLERS
4.49
10' SUCTION LIFT
4.33
4' ELEVATION
1.73
22" CHECK VALVE @ 142 GPM
1.6
4" GATE VALVE @ 142 GPM
.57
SPRINKLER PSI
60.0
75.39
So MISCELLANEOUS LOSS
3.77
79.1 OR 182.86 FT ED
PLMp
B1 2TPM 10 HP, 75/o EFFICIENCY,
142 GPM,
80 PSI
HORSEPOWER
182.86 x 142 25966.12 =
8.74 PSI
3960 x .75 2970
PIPE. &
PVC IS SDR-26, PR-160; SDR-21,
PR-200
& SCH 40.
FITTINGS ARE
FI_ IVGS
SCH 40 & SCH 80
NPSFk
33.3(.69 + 10 + 3) = 19-61
Tha STBLOCK
4" 901 ELBOW: 23 x 79.10 =
152
4" TEE:
16.2 x 79.16 1.07
=
USE TABLE 11
AB
1200
.
1200
2" END CAP: 4.56 x 79.16 =
1200
.3
VERN PARKER 12/29/98

1?xl Imrr D-3
TABLE 3 - Snlid Set Irrigntion Gun Settings JOIN ROB ERT THORNTON
MAC, Model and 'I'ypc of Equiisnscnt: 7025 RD Sill?INKI..FRS, l /4 NOZZi,I',S; 60 PSI , 135' DIAMETER 14.2 GPM
Field Nol
and
Line Nod
Number of
Ii drants
Wetted
Diameter
(feel)
Ilydrant Spacing (A)
Along Between
Pipeline PI eline%
Application
Role
(Inlhr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
DlomcleT Pressure Time
(inches) fn? Gun (psi) On, Il dranl (hr
Comments
S1
4
135'
80
80
.21/.42
1/4
60
2 - 1
.51 ACRES
S2
5
.21/.42
2 — 1
.66
S3
9
.21
2
1.32 ✓
it
8
. 21 / . 28
2 — 1.5
1..15
it,
.211.28
I,
It
2 - 1 .5
.63 ✓
S6
5
.21/.28
2 - 1.5
- ✓
ISee attached map.
2Sltow separate entries for each pipchne wilh hydrants in each field.
MRCS, NC
TUNE, 1996

1:X1 Imrr DA
TA11LE d - Irrigation System Sltecificutimis JOHN ROBERT WRONTON
Traveling
Irrigation Con
I Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow !tale of SpriuhIcr (gpm)
14.2
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
79.16
Design. PreclpitatIon Rate (in/hr)
Ilose Lenglia (feet)
xxxxxXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
xxxxxxxx
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
ELECTRIC
Pomp Power Requirement (hp)
8.74
TA11LE S - Thrttst Block Specifications t
Designer may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
LOCATION
TiIRUST BLOCK
AREA 61. ft.)
900 (lend h4.
_
Dead End 2"
Tee
'See IJSDA-NI(CS Field 017111ce Technical Guide, Seclion IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
USE' 1200 MW SOIL—BEARTNG STRENcrlr NRCS, NC
JUKE. 1996

SOLID i1;� SYSTQt
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a. similar shect most convinient to the designs/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance ofali equipmenL
AT FIRST START UP, CLOSE 4" GATE VALVE AND OPEN ONLY ABOUT
1140 TURNS. WHEN THE SPRINKLIRS OPERATE FREE OF AIR,
SLOWLY OPEN GATE VALVE UNTIL PUMP PRESSURE IS 75. TO
APPLY 1/2" OF WATER OPERATE FULL CIRCLE SPRINKLES ABOUT
2%2 HOURS. MAKE SURE TO OPERATE HALF CIRCLE SPRIN=S
ONE-HALF THE TIME OF THE FULL CIRCLE SPRINKLMS.
MAKE SURE TO DRAIN PUMP DURING MEEZING WEATHER.
Irrigatlon PararnelM USDA44RCS
October 1995 page-4 North Carolina

-" CROCKETT IRRIGATION, INC. . a.O.sox 396 0 WILLIAMSTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27892 . 919-792-3121
JOHN ROBERT THORNTON
P 0 BOX 245
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366
TRAVELER
SPRINKLER SR-100 GUN, .7 TAPER BORE NOZZLE; 70 PSI, 120 GPM, 275' DIA`ETER
SPACING 73% x 275 = 200
APPLICATION 96.3 x 120 360 115560
RATE .1 x.9) X 340 48086.15 - •24 x 1.06 = .25"
.24 X 360 - .39
TDH 1860' 4"'PR-160 PVC PIPE, 120 GPif, .33 PER 100'
10' ELEVATION INCLUDING RISER HEIGHT
10' SUCTION LIFT
4" CHECK VALVE @ 120 GPM
SPRINKLER PSI
820' x 2.75 TRAVELER HOSE @ 120 GPM, 2.52 PER 100'
5% MISCELLANEOUS LOSS
NPSH,k 33.03-(.69 + 10 + 5) = 17.34
PUMP B3JQBM, 120 GPM, 2000 RPM, 260' HID; 50% EFFICIENCY
256.32 x 120 30758.4 15.53
HORSEPOjv�R 0 x 2985 .75
- - 20.71 HIP
6.14
4.33
4.33
.2
70.0
20.66
105.66
28
110.96 OR 256.32 FT HD
PIPE AND PVC IS PR-160, SDR-26. FITTINGS ARE EPDXY -COATED STEEL
FITTINGS AND CL-200
TRAVEL SPEED 1.605 x 120 = 192.6 = 2.75 ' PER MINUTE
0� 5 70
THRUSTBLOCK 4" 90' ELBOW: 23 x 110.96 _ 2.13 4" TEE & 16.2 x 110.96 = 1.5
USE LA.BLE 11 ��0 CAP: 1200
4" 450 ELBOW: 12.4 x 110.96 _ 1.15
1200
VERN P_41LKER 12 /29/98

Operator: _ _ - . _. �" County: 'aS ; OU Date: 03/09/01
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): feet
I. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
sows (farrow to finish)
x
1417 lbs. =
0
sows (farrow to feeder)
x
522 lbs. =
0
head (finishing only)
x
135 lbs. -
0
0 sows (farrow to wean)
is
433 lbs. =
0
253�';, head (wean to feeder)
x
30 lbs. --
80670
Describe other:
0
Total Average Live Weight = 80670
2. MINiMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 80670 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)11b. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 80670 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
SLUDGE STORAGE NOT COMPUTED
Volume = cubic feet LANDOWNER REQUEST, SLUDGE TC
REMOVED AS NEEDED
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top lehgth (feet)--------------------- 208.5
Inside top width 117.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 42.9
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)- ----- 33.2
Freeboard (feet)--------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon) --- 2.5 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SSIENDI SSIEND2 SSISIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 - 2.5 2.5 203.5 112.0 8.7
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
203.5 112.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
160.1 68.6
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
181.8 90.3
22792 (AREA OF TOP)
10983 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
65666 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
22792.0 65666.2 10982.9
Total Designed Volume Available = 143858

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
208.5 117.0
Buildings (roof and lot water)
24394.5 square feet
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 24394.5 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be riod to b e 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW
Volume = 80670 lbs. ALW1135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gallday
Volume = 147357 gals. or 19700.2 cubic feet
55. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
1.37
180
Volume = gallons/day * 180 days storage17.48 gallons
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 9.2 inches
Volume = 9.2 in * DA 1 12 inches per foot
Volume = 18661.8 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = inches 1 12 inches per foot " DA
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 19700 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 18662 cubic feet
5D. 0 cubic feet
TOTAL 38362 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====================>
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========>
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================>
Freeboard===================================>
Side slopes=================================>
Inside top length===========================>
Inside top
Top of dike elevation=======================>
Bottom of lagoon elevation============= =====>
Total required volume=======================>
Actual design volume========================>
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
Stop pumping
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.==========>
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
Required minimum treatment volume===========>
Volume at stop pumping elevation============>
Start pumping
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
Volume at start pumping elevation===========>
Required volume to be pumped================>
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========>
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
180
days
9.2
inches
0.0
inches
1.0
feet
2.5
: 1
208.5
feet
117.0
feet
42.9
feet
33.2
feet
cu.ft.
/43826
43858
cu. ft.
0.0
feet
0.0
feet
0.0
feet
39.2
feet
105464
cu. ft.
-39390
cu. ft.
0.0
feet
7. DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
143858 cu. ft.
-39390 cu. ft.
38362 cu. ft.
0 cu. ft.
1.4 feet

Operator: - -, _ -.; - _ ._ , County: _ :.
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
sows (farrow to finish)
x 1417 lbs.
-J sows (farrow to feeder)
x 522 lbs.
.: head (finishing only)
x 135 Ibs.
sows (farrow to wean)
x 433 Ibs.
head (wean to feeder)
x 30 Ibs.
Describe other
Total Average Live- Weight =
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Date: 03/15/01
feet
Volume = 85410 tbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)Ilb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 85410 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (f6et)------ ---------------
Inside top width (feet) ----------------------
Top of dike elevation (feet) -----------------
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet) ------------
Freeboard (feet)-------- ---- -----------------
Side slopes (inside lagoon) ---------- --------
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
0
0
0
0
85410
0
85410
SLUDGE STORAGE NOT COMPUTED
LANDOWNER REQUEST, SLUDGE TC
REMOVED AS NEEDED
185.5
164.0
42.2
32.8
1.0
, 2.5 :1
SS/END1 SSIEND2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 180.5 159.0 8.4
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
180.5 159.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
138.5 117.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
159.5 138.0
28700 (AREA OF TOP)
16205 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
88044 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
28699.5 88044.0 16204.5
Total Designed Volume Available = 186127

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
185.5 164.0
Buildings (roof and lot water)
30422.0 square feet
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 30422.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be riod to b e 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW
Volume = 85410 lbs. ALW1135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day
Volume = 156016 gals. or 20857.7 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water y
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
1.37
180
Volume = gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = c.2 inches
Volume = 9.2 in * DA 1 I inches per foot
Volume = 23272.8 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume I inches 1 12 inches per foot' DA
Volume = 34224.8 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 20858 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 23273 cubic feet
5D. 34225 cubic feet
TOTAL 78355 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====================>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========>
9.2
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================>
13.5
inches
Freeboard===================================>
1.0
feet
Side slopes--===____________________________>
2.5
: 1
Inside top length===========================>
185.5
feet
Inside top width============================>
164.0
feet
Top of dike elevation=======================>
42.2
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation==================>
32.8
feet
Total required volume=======================>
163765
cu. ft.
Actual design volume========================>
1861,274 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
0.0
feet
Stop pumping elev.__________________________>
0.0
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.==========>
0.0
feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
38.8
feet
Required minimum treatment volume===========>
85410
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation============>
-138378
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.=====_=__________________>
0.0
feet
Must be at bottonWf freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
151902
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation===========>
-138378
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped================>
44131
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========>
0
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
1.4
feet
7. DESIGNED BY: r`,Gwlfv1= NT.`l APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Exis ' or New or :Expanded :="(Please circle one)
General Information:
Name of Farm: Facility No: S/
Owner(s) Name: ibJ fit Pobee 7ko,,,,+per Phone No:
Mailing Address: 7JJ 1 All,t 01,L Aod r_ ., /ems � L � S3o?9
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: . X4SJ1,_
Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:
Latitude and Longitude: 3S o /d .76 ` / 73 6 R a ash Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with Iocation identified and describe below (Be specific:
road names, directions, milepost, etc.): �_ n; %Cs /J E Akw ra 0c,�-
Jjj�t53- D
Operation DescrlDtlon:
Type Swine No of Annals
can to Feeder E -3 6
0 Feeder to Finish
Q Farrow to Wean
Q Farrow to Feeder
() Farrow to Finish
() Gilts
0 Boars
Type of Poultry
QLaycr
oPullets
Other Type of Livestock:
No of Animals
Type of Cattle No of Animals
()Dairy
()Beef
Number of Animals:
Expanding' Operation Only.,
Previous Design Capacity. Additional:Desrg>r'Capacity. Total Design Capacity:
Acreage Available for Application:_ oZ S-- R O Required Acreage:_ �t-14 ti qa R 0 W-B"it-c.
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: 12 _.. Total Capacity: _ .320, . 9 7_ Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or Q (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELE10(please circle one)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I(we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we)
know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a
new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by
the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District. 1 (we) know that modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submiaed to the Soil and Water Conservation
District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is
changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: J& o
Signature: Date:
Name of Marla er (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 1

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina
Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following
elements are included in the plan as applicable. While. each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each
certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC,I) the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) ollection Storage, Treatment System
Cbec appropriate box
( Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
() New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such *as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds, have
been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed;
Address(Agency): P O Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518-1096 Phone No: 919-658-0707
Signature: Date: ,3/1/0 j
J- v
B) Land Agglication Site3"I
The plan provides for minimum separation (buffers); adequate amount of Iand for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): P O Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518-1096 Phone No: 919-658-0707
Signature: Date: 3�9/� /
� r
C)"Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check appropriate box
( facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
() Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance
with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): P O Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518-1096 Phone No.: 919-658-0707
Signature: Date: 3 /Q/o/
.C�
AWC — August 1. 1997

D) Apl2lication and Handli Equipment
Check the ropriate box
( Existing or ezpanding_facilit�with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management
plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the
specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of application has been established; required buffers
-can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). j}t //a5 are, r ZI j,y,,t
r,4/�/�`
() New, expanded, or exists facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of applications has
been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
O New,exWded,or existing facility, without existing waste application equipment for land spreadin not using_spray
irri ation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed gpplication equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applicaions has
been established: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc
Date Work Completed:
Address(Agency): P O Box 1096, Beulaville, NC 28518-1096
Phone No: 919-658-0707
Signature:
Date:
E) Odor Contwl, Insect Controln16Ulity Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD,SLWVVP.RC,or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortaility Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
Manangement Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): P O Box 1096 Beulaville, NC .28518-1096 Phone No.: 919-658-0707
Signature:AO
Date: 33/t1a I
F) Written Notice of New or Ext)6nding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded. I(we)
certify that I(we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and ail property owners
r 1/f who own property located across a public road, street or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. Ile notice
was is compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners
notified is attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC — August 1, 1997

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, torage, Treatment ln&Wlation
New, ex2anded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meat or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: Agripment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
enc Address A Beulaville, NC 28518 Phone No.:
( g Y)' (g19)568-2420, 919 658-4747
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
C��7he
ropriate box
ropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
() Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system as
specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to established the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropnate for
compliance with the waste utilization plan.
(} Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days of
this certification, the owner has conunitsed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print):
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc
Date Work Completed:
Address A enc Beulaville, NC 28518
( g Y)' 919 568-2420 91 s 658-0707
Phone No.:
Signature:
Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IILB above have been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and if
appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action
from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manger (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from Iounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
/A the plan.
I/ For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary,.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Apipliotion and Handling Eguipment insWiation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate block
(mal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration and
adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
() Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract
agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained. calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
{) Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased
and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with cropping
system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): P 0 Box 1096, Beuiaville, NC 285I8-1096 Phone No.: 919-658-0707
Signature: Date:
The following *nature block is dhily4be used when the box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specified in my
(our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist
within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this
verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD.SLWUP.RC od)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): P 0 Box 1096 BeulaviIle, NC 28518-1096 Phone No.: 919-658-0707
Signature: Date: 3 s/pl
AWC -- Aujust 1, 1997

.,State (31'North Carnfilla
Depurorment ol'Environmoitt Lind Natural 'Resources
Division oaf Water Ouality
'von-Discharge?ennit A pnilcation Form
(IHJ.iL:JRAJ AL4YBEP1fC)Jr0C0P[Ff) A.iR T"SEAS 4,V0FJ(__,1Y.41,j
General Pt-milit - Existing 4nim.91 Waste Operations
Tilt: f0flo►Vilig qucStj()j3S ha---e been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
i-rvie-w the inforinvinn for completerics.9 and make auy currections that Aiv 4pprupriate. 1:r a
rjupstion has not boon eompi'etcd by the Divisivil, plrasr- t:umplere as best as possible. Uo not leave
UJIN, question un.11I.Swelvd.
I. GENERAL JNFORMATION-
!A FftJL-V1Ka1,;,.
1.2
1.3 1% 1.2
Tclephol)e N-umber (inClude area zcide")' 4
1.4 County where facili ry is I
..,
Locarlm (Dirmetions fjupjj lizarcic major hilghway, PlCasf MCILIdt SR IILMcrs fur scare roads. 'plea-e biellude a
j Q1 Q INUM, Mall MAll will, 111r !UVuL1vn oj'Lhe f�ini ldleot; i'euo.,!
n Print ;-arm Manager's name 0i'different from Land Owner')'­
7 Le»ee's! InItgrator"rname (,[applicable; please 6,Je AW0, typeis listed):
1,8 FACi I iTY Driginally Began
i,v Oai.o) ofFminflity 8xpansion(s) (if applicable):
2. 0.PJER_ATJ0N INFMWATION'.-
2. 1 Facility No.: Sf (,;vtuay num:iet)- /-4 fAcility nurnher,.
OPtraliun $01'
The "No. ofAnima)3" shmAki Lc aumr;er rorwroci) tf.,e ;,,,asEe mallamnentstrucrure-swere desivned
I -
Type q= � %vlrle No. of Animals Type oLF�qiflrry Njo.ofAnhals LyjLojqart1q No. of Anima]
'r 0 L r
F-, Cd -.r to Finish o Non -Layer Re,!f
Fan -ow ro Wean (;; Sow)
Farrj)w to F i-r-df-r (z miv)
r2170%ti ILI Finish (;sow)
C1LbL;, Type of Livertut:k ufi ilic tart: No
FOR -NI: AWO-G-E 04/27/99 Page 1 of 4

r-"=- U-;
Facility Number-.
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIF%CATIOIti:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for a .:,c /_' _ (Facility name; listed in question 1.))
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and comp! to to the est of my• knowledge. I un erstand that if all required parts of this
applicadon are not completed and that if all required supporting iofonnacion and attachments are not included, this application
Package will be returned to roe as incomplete.
Signanue _ . _ . _ _�. --------- Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete onl}, if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6). attest that this
application for (Facilih- name fisted in question 1.1)
has been revitwe y me an is accurate an complete to t r cst or nay knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting infonnation and attachments are not included; this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
rHE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORbIArION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
1\ ON-DJSCH.-%.RG,E PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
R.A.LEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NU ER: (919) 733-071.9
FORLNI: AWO-G-E 04/27/99 Page 3 of 4

17' 30'
New 7n trre oe /UD+T9
N C,
3905
550 000
35° 15L-
78° 2
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
in cooperation with North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development
Control by USGS. NOS/NOAA, and North Carolina Geodetic Survey
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs
taken 1981. Field checked 1982. Map edited 1986
Projection and 10.000-foot grid ticks: North Carolina coordinate
system (Lambert conformal conic)
1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 17
1927 North American Datum
To place on the predicted Notch American Datum 1983,
move the projection lines 12 meters south and
24 meters west as shown by dashed corner ticks
There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of
the National or State reservations shown on this map
Short dashed blue lines Indicate elliptical bay outlines
visible on aerial photographs
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
CORNER 9 MI. 742
1 wTFRSrATE95
MN
Ch
I
I M,
28 MILS
UT`M GRID AND 19B6 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
r�

Certificate of Coverage AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to'
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
John Thornton
Thornton Swine 1-4
731 West Darden Road
Clinton NC 28328
Dear John Thornton:
/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
" 7
4?..
r
Subject: Fertilizer Applicatibn•Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 5.1 06f
Johnston County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Revised January 22, ] 999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number-��
Farm Name:
On -Site Representative: iU
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: /�1 olCe,,
Date of site visit: � l 1I s
FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) Ft F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at thAtime based on
exemption E1 C2 3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: L- 7'pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1 hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
' stationary gun system wlpermane pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
VC1c.c1 � ff� Ic 6x 1C If 4 r -�> S4P r T` q
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part 1 exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
V11,,E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
C.a S r- s q-r3-K�
E3 Adequate D, irrigation'6perating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's-last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director .
John Thornton
Thornton Swine 1-4
731 West Darden Rd
Clinton NC 28328
Dear John Robert Thornton:
4 •
NCDEN
,
IR
77-1, 1
NORTH CAROL N1 DEPARTMENT QF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATUR.�jRESOURCES
February 5, 1999
t
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your application received on January 5, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to John Thornton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Thornton Swine 1-4, located in Johnston County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2000 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective'from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system far collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right- to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resour REC
P Division of Water Quality RQUAUTY FDO
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form N
040051999
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Cations
�@ pamitt��,,.
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Divisib7tlf Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate: If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible Do40heave
any question unanswered. v. X-,}1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Thornton Swine 1-4
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: John Thornton
1.3 Mailing address: 731 West Darden Rd S�,_
City, State: Clinton_ NC Zip: 28328
Telephone Number (include area code): 9I0-564-6945
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): X
InA %Of M 4 Z.— • �.,r
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1I. /o / �f -
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.I Facility No.: _51 (county number); T106 (facility number).
2.2. Operation Description: Swine operation �'
Feeder to Finish
2000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 51 - 106

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 5' , Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): QY, j
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YE or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? !
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 3 �)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials_
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations; ,
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility,
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If vour CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please. include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 51 - 106

RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Facility Number: 51 - 106
Facility Name: Thornton Swine 1-4
FJAN 0 5 1999
Non -Discharge Permit ing
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION -
(Land Owner's name listed in question 12), attest that
t s application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will b re rned to me s incomplete.
Signature Date zt
5. NIANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51 - 106

17' 30"
{
3905
550 000
FEET
35° 1S--+-
78° 22' 30" 2190000 FEET KEENER 1O.N/. 741
CLl.VTON 17 M1.
4N Produced by the United States Geological Survey ,�
in cooperation with North Carolina
ment
Natural Resources and Community Developf
Development
Control by USGS, NOSINOAA, and North Carolina Geodetic Survey
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs
taken 1981. Field checked 1982. Map edited 1986
Projection and 10.000-foot grid ticks: North Carolina coordinate
system (Lambert conformal conic)
1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid. zone 17
1927 North American Datum
To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983,
move the projection lines 12 meters south and
24 meters west as shown by dashed comer ticks
There may be private Inholdings within the boundaries of
the National or State reservations shown on this asap
Short dashed blue lines indicate elliptical bay outlines
visible on aerial photographs
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
T5 CORNER 9 ML 742
. 1-0 1•V7'SRSr4Tr 95
MH
GH
118 MILS I 1— 1
28 MILS
UTN GRID AND 1986 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
lox

V., .,. [. t n; tir k _ r ' • e w �. a �,�q(r
�. k •1 � �Z ti � 1 S� ; r`�`�''zyr 3 x�1� ��` � '' '° I '�ie�� -•.� �� ''• � � f : � �. �� I
'-.r4Lr = ;t �� i '�L� w d 'V�i y'bi h',,;• L ry. tyi �Air. -� 9�t �3' � _ ' /'' �''�L` r � f p.'s y = _ �, • I
--^�—Yc-
6)I i, Ci'��: Yrc,`J IrT, lyis �• L .X M' f�� ,� �lVYi
a'�;�
Ml
���' N��' G `hi`} r ,_, ��'+�'�. _ ¢,141 � ,�q.y��'� - • t = r 7 �,� � y .a : - .,ti�L • r / - � I 'k'• � � •� ! •�
,,v k
f < a x -(� y�.y
v •✓�
�`' '•� li � 1,'r.�'+Yv'" �A t^
;4,�,"`a L`.J)I V� '� :'.., �••.y '= _ r "=�� t raie �. f ���"-, �i �j.7J� "� _ .J
,� il1= ,• r ti ,
'r `t'�'^y ��.; .`.'!_ •.a :�•. �. t �r`- �,,e r... a,. '�,}� ��, y� �.T fw�,/�
LK
�€k�J ����` cd` s� t � ��5s�li :s��' r ; ✓ ; �ry ✓ .if7� i �' a h-• n�'I �e�+`'b ,�"' �j ' ' ,l�'��f
i'x i :',1�� '•`:�i%� "#;-`'� r j�' "''�; '� ` Wn�
+.his Ct ` _►"� �' . / all
�t 4,ii f .� f�'S�J .✓�� {.e'"' Y
,t gg(. :l} ? Y }, i h^ •-� `rYn 1F. I t. w�' ir"�•��l 5.._ \4' J• 1 iJ l-iY oc',1
�t •_ r�}7s�;!}!S js � ^t.�x' ���j. �' .,,7r+�`p! `�"� X'�'�•s,�ry�i. -t.. r �n,t„5a� �- � ',} �N I��r+°r�k
�f�r �;,�- 17 /r 3;�„�.' aKJ �,(� .f YI `a1 %,� � -: / hh tZ �,r� t,7 �� F }�� Td1 •
-Owt�k'�
n,�s,+k +�• �.• �-P^. I} �. ' R+ ': rf. "t: >'^ t ' t {_,+. M" _N +- •,}.r t a�1a�1.. �'4 .a..r )
a 1y tT.' �`><" '^''a:a"^,,�i n �ti ti • } Rv �r F :is.�-• � t M-.d �,:rf;.i w :t4 .}+ F", +M�r '? i i�.\i� .� s '.�; '�. �r Pe: ✓;i:-:.
� atY.a t}a �.-<:��V �..,/ r• cs s�%'�Sr ` f,... :".S'� p,.; � •y,r .!" t �' ,+�'t ''p � ;�a, cis _ k � ,-:§;�� d '+'�.i err �w�?-k✓ '�; r
1'S+�.�p /�x,rA rr - Ki+,'�-� .k' .#i�t7 ti�'`yl _ ''.-�ryr�+k• �._ On
��3r-ter' l • - N vlii \ 'p o a
A.
3t h=�2.- t �Sz .. ;►} Q t�rr y,���2,�k4 1 7a� i:/ �.a r
%
.i •p - , }. ;4 �r C rna,, +�
`t.' e� i e:rp sg rYE yy :✓.
- � 2f s �� 1', is :t•�' �fi^ ,µ.le ,\ A '. i r 5 _ "Fr:+ t �, . % A
y �� � x��;t w.y�i' YaJ �t� �_'- � i•L'kti' f s~�' 4� , '� ��� 7�� 8��a 1�3 qJ,,r ` '�
y 'z: `°� ¢tp � �� ".l -'�: rz 'r' ��' ..{� SJ yr � r= S .+ � �3r � „i Lr � _r ? a - � ,L•1
r1, k' t � •�''�''w{'' h -y r�S'C7,6'--�' ! ,r' `k ,�{ - i i• "+�� � �1Ch. J '. 3 � ";T' '�
of
� �r ��' s�„�i�=� \sAr ,� � f;�` r .a" ";aJ`,-k ♦r5�- » 7y�'"a�te:'a� � s S � t a .��;'',.
a5 fa`J al
•.t' h_ w 5 - iiga'ir-�,}+' { .,( s :'Miw ' f •��i O�� y-b���r
IL
# fix"",$ r'• �... -_ 8l; , !t. 1 �y' A ar. 1 M.idY4 t •! i
irl
i�r?a 3~ � •�.� :t Y.7 �,s ''�. ?=i 'J�al3�}?�Y`��4,'1�Y.r f
•ryy��" II :t i 3 V• "gt L n2.i �
.47
t3231. Port 'C

We 7,eC/ fqI-' L
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: JOHN ROBERT THORNTON
Location: 731 WEST DARDEN RD.
CLINTON NC 28328
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2000.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to -be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding. at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons.per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when -the surface.is frozen. Either'of.these conditions.
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations..
_" Page: 1

k
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
S
5. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and #
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by -the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2000 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 3800 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2000 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 4600 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
BH
N
TIME
4179
1
BnA
4.5
225
0
2.3
517.5
1 _l
I
APR-SEP
4179 1--1 1 14�SL-11 150 10 12.3 1115
SEP.APR .
0.1
E1
TOTAL1632.5
-- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS--
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
---
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3688
1 H1-
BnA
BH
4.5
225
0
11.26
2533.5
APR-SEP
-rr-1.
3688 -•1 H1
ISEP.APR.
3688 I2 H-1 UcB
ilu 0-
3688 -2 H-
SEP.APR .
4175 1 H-7 BnA
f� r
!7 r
4175 1 H_
ISEP.APR.
4175 2 H7— BOA
4175 I --2 H7
ISEP.APR.
4175 ^-2 H7
APR.AUG.
s&-11 150 10 111.251562.5
BH
I4.8
1240
10
SG
11
150
10
BH
14.5
1225
10
SG
I 1
150
10
I C 185 186.25 120
W 135 184 0
SB 18� 72 - 0 -
1.72 1412.8
APR-SEP
1.72 186
i
1.5 337.5
APR-SEP
1.50 175
6.06 1522.675
MAR-JU
6.06 1509.04
73V, r/
6.06 1436.32
4175 3 H-I I UCB I C 170 167.5 120 I3.31 223.425
#� MAR-JUN
4175 1 W 135 184 10 13.31 1278.04
Da rtea • d

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ISEP.APR.
4175
--3 H I SB I18 I72 13.31
1
1238.32-
JAPR.AUG.
lIQ
4175
5 H--1 Ly 7.98
IC �115-0�123.75120
Jy ��
1368.775
MAR -STUN
� d
4175
-5 H- JW 160 1144 Q 12.98
429.12
ISEP.APR.
4175
-5 H- JSB 1 3 IIJ 1124 Q 12.98
369.52
JAPR.AUG.
END
TOTAL
7382.53
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall..
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
SB
SOYBEANS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
W
WHEAT
2.4
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
2.3
632.5
26.83
73R-Pyg-,g
.5 E9.9b
29.13
•
&et-5 35
E3a 7. � o
* BALANCE
-------I���V--
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
:SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require• precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 740 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3700
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 12.3333333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 29.6 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts..
!
I
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract I
Field I
Soil Type
I Crop
I (in/hr)
l (inches)
3688 I
1 H1- +
BnA
I BH
l .40
I *.50
3688 1
I
2 H-1 l
UcB
I
I BH
I
l .40
!
l *.50
I
3688
I
I -1 H1 I
I
I WA
!
l .40
l *.50
3688
I
l -2 H- l
f
l SG
I
l .40
I *.50
I
4175 l
I
1 H-7 I
BnA
I
I BH
I
l .40
1
l *.50
I
4175
!
l 2 H7- I
BoA
I
I C.
I
l .40
l *.50
4175
! I
1 3 H-1 I
UcB
!
I C
I
f .40
I *.50
4175
! 1
l 5 H-1 I
Ly
I
I C
!
I .40
I *.50
4175
! I
I --1 H- l
I
! SG
!
l .40
I *.50
4173
l --2 H7 !
l SB
I .40
*.50

i
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
f
I
f
f W
I
f
I *.50
4175
f --2
H7 I
f .40
4175
I -3
f
H- f
I
f
I
f *.50
f .40
I SB
4175
I --3
H- f
I W
.40
I *.50
4175
f
f -5
I
H- I
f
I
f
*.50
f .40
SB
4175
C
I --5
I
H- I
I
f
I W
C .40
I *.50
4179
I
f 1
f
f BnA
I
f
I
C *.5o
I .50
I BH
I4179
I
I -1
I
I
f
I
I
f
I *.50
f
I .50
I
WA
!
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 60.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 2.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
fo., +l S q oil n q � 1P1iG hl rr� � /� / A,V
�J J / l J 1
At)nus)s a h w;4 ),e, 4 nna a /S' un ),'I eo As
�s �Abl�,1e� ¢►� /YReT �.8� T1e�dS 01, #C'c
/Cie-F /gyp /6s C,?
1�NN udIS Nf AC 1Ls pet- �G o?7 �e- W;kl le- /DVA)A 04
1066e c' Li ✓ea- 4- '7`; r/� 7 - 1 %Z a e rr r loo d, 0-*7 54tmmrA.-
/u 4(4Ef /err- /T t /!`�A ld a 1k73 t'v /►C 4h �Je
To- Az PAID' "1,5e w! A5 / wdc d ze
7 rp` / 4/79 Frlal / ,sN
Sce
fiYec(
308
-W 75,-
��ll�''r�
�i el
a- 731.1
fL1J iw el,
7�g. •�l�s � od
s3-,z i? , 9 - ,ve edJ
lnq )/CM 0 '7 'Irl X �/ 0 -1 /) e e a /-r 14 4, b e #0 c,
1.
Y
e �
Paae : in

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy'of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 —Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste
showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
animal waste management system.
from washdown facilities,
shall not be discharged into the
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REFIRED SPECIFICATIONS
IS. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling
be inspected on
and spills. A
site.
structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be .the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:THORNTON SWINE 1-4
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25--year, 25-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: JOHN ROBERT THORNTON
(Please print)
n
Signature:
x Date: .tea
Name of Manag r(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please prznt)Chris W. Smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-538I
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
=Smithfield NC 27 7
J
Signature: /'- / Date:
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, erc.)
z, %124,-�Ih B hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on �6, acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown cn the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand thcz the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: X . ,% �� C L �'Cc-,�- ' ✓`�'��.^-mate: S'
Waste Producer: ! ir, r%� �r .� — Date:
J
Technical Representative: Date: y/3v,�1��
SWCD Representative:
D a t s :
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Snared Items"
(see Required Snecificaticn No. 2.)
Page: �.�

OrANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
ti
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Nccary Public.
Page:
/G

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
7-
I ► hereby give ahrL_Ra jowl / /d`A /Q y
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on O acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The fields) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for ccrmmercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landow
waste Producer:
Technical Repre
SWCD Representative:
Date: U
Date:
Date: v y
Date
Teri:, cf Agreement: -7AN , 19JI to
` (Minimum of Ten Years cr. Ccsc shared Icems)
// (See Requized Spec 4 icac_'cr. No. 2.)
Page: _13�
/%

Nj
, k I
i
q
I
t
10

PUN PUG RIGHTS AGREEMENT
I, Katherine B. Thornton, landowner of ASCS Field #1-T3668 in Johnston County, North
Carolina, have agreed to lease to John Robert Thornton 20+/- acres of land on the above
mentioned parcel of land and have agreed to lease to John Robert Thornton the total
pumping rights of animal waste upon this same parcel for the amount of S1000.00 per year
for the land lease and for the amount of S1200.00 per year for the total pumping ruts.
If the above mentioned owner sells the above listed property, the land lease and the total
pumping rights shall be transferred to the new owner under the same listed conditions.
This contract shall become effective on January 01, 1998, and run through
January 01, 2008.
Katherine B. Thornton .
Landowner
16hn Robert T"norrnton
Lease.
Notate Public
Commission expires:` 1. cL�,

�:..
r

0
n
Fn�

0
0

+ - ! Ar'�.• •*q! ter`
+1� � �,� s 't �(.�+� ,rcr •"—� ' J �• �• �`�y r�ir. �:'• {�Fty' � 7�!x• � j .' •
3 _/r� F' .✓ ram',,
L4 Off•!# Q s,q �f ;�' {7a1 `,► f pi Q ,,.
Ol
'OIL,
ICA
01
r�: �+ .t! , y 1
� 'f,'
1 t �, i� f * *' J � =. - .F r r +�, �t r !r �il � .SY •.
! ��� �..�,! ,7{� ��„ ,.�• �i� q�, ,r,� �� �� :��'SY,�,���rr�"'.� . ir��.',.
. M"a !. fr r;',y • n, "r.1 rl-..,.z �' i`'#i,'r t,�,♦ r1.,•. :L.'.tM.Y/•6,}
_ •�, n 1 �' ! , - rr ii `r. � r, f r�;1 �.. `i.�. �d' ; t} +P, i�„••j :f I ' �F�%`C r
^•-... „,�_" r, +L•� ,' `, v � i � ';� � % • r`,''!''6�• � •. t / �:-,#I'` r;,�;f���i1: �+ r~ '�*�y �C' ��-"'��';pf ' J
'•� �'' C'• .5��+•. 1'+L�-.fir . �

VWF 4S,

/ / L
WXST9 IiAIMG2ZC2= PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR FEEDLOTS
Please retu= the cnmpletad for= to the Diviaiaa of Savisaanental xamagc=ent at
the ac'draea on the riverae aide of thin for=.
Name of
Address:
Phone No. v -d
County : a
ha 5ZEil. A/C -
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude (�J 2Q'' /' ate' zsp (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identifig�d.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : .SW,'oe_
Design capacity (number of animals): ODO
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
aacaaaaaaacaaaaacaaacsgaaaaaaaacavaaaasiaaaa=caaasasa,cagaacasasaaaaaaaaaacasaaa
Technical Specialist certifications See- R tia e_4'M,hf"
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to ISA NCAC 6F .00OS, I certify that the now -or
wanimal al waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil, and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to ISA NCAC 2H.0217 and
ISA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-ha-v_ een verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers)
` ge-gess; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for tinning of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical, specialist (Please Print) d/ris W 5,"
Affiliation:_ Y/? C 5
,ddress (Agency)A 909 1Yo,--,0-ASt.-ee Phone Nol'-V/ 9- 9YV- _
Signature: Xe a _ Date:.'
sac=a====case=zaagapeac ssaaaam= m uftn c Mammaaadcaaaai�saarr ssaxtcaRze=eels aRtYCas
Qwaer/Xanagar Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. .1 (we) know that any additional e-xpansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Nam of Land Cm4pax (Please Print): r� O t O
Signature: Date:._!: —Q?60
Y=a of K=Agar, if different From owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
!note: A change in landownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
OEM USE ONLY: AC33' V #
' gee. rY T 6J /" e (J
rM

John Robert Thornton - Lagoons
Note:
This is an old operation established prior to January 1, 1994.
the first lagoon of the two was an old NRCS lagoon established in
1983, the second lagoon was added without NRCS assistance sometime
after that. It meets all the minimum requirements set forth by DEM
except for the fact of the liners which I can't address. I will
say that it appears to be sealed due to the fact that they have
been pumping them out on cropland now for several years. It has
been pumped on a regular basis.
�.lYuq..L�r
5 Cr 6-a7- 95"

r

..f� OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions, flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
oo..
an� !%3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion %JOQ CO as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 3 g.iOO' or before fluid depth is
less than b feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per .irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour..
S. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
b. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
B. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

i
fit 75
F�7
R
�r�n j nl
0 � ��'
C� •�
-s �5 r; X i
Rh£ �6
3r
°ti •- tiV
"" 7 1.Y;;7 < /i-,Y 1,
tJ
C' • � Q
'Fr f' a
ryo
7
..r

Q � h '•
J
. . . . . . . . . . . .

0 4
ef

T,4oRiv T-o/u)
/-AA/n
Z
r
LAG oo tJ -0
c+FuCL ,l
'� `yam � t� �: l �J•�, .
CAM - — - . i r -- --

�G oovv ,2_ 84o ] �7orn /Oh
9 9 - - /7y
2_
%aP pike Aew Corn, Z
9•
4 aoh l
20% t �10 - �v ��a�% v?D�•�
TaD U� �LLe�� �o�u e�rr�� `�o�•%O vyP
I
m

X Yon
9 7 7 x /r �
_ S�• 7. �/.Ys �Q Y X //�
6 �szas X 9�;zs
-- :?2 sits
�s2V,Z.
�`3sa7 c4�yZ.,
�Y /ass X //7

02� y r lay
0Z5
Aleedl
ivy -2
17675. X rxY io ���/ 7Y
z s--
Zo 77 5` /Y / SL x a
c �
/751. /( /S3 = 2 -<,j�9y S'
3j�3L�

LJQ�I� Pro�CeCe'C� �� ZxceC. /✓t?e'GfJ 9d3Z Ci7`/'
, 3 33
/65�, S X 1Y3 A3
E1 e U_ �lO, DIO % Gva,�� r�' �,r c 4-:; 5

�o�v.m� o Th �at�Dans /yy -Y,70
= 3301
vz�/ `3j 77 9 �'�•-

V
5rc m rnar o 101NrnrJ 47� Gt/Us�e / /R.�
/ �r
�-
-ram Lvo��
y
yo�rs�{ aT oZ5'y._.-�5�
y
�4.7�
�3c),3o .cell
.s�u d ran �e Cao-nc ram. �-o b/em w,•rh Th/3 s 5lem oJ1 dwa 3 r- , 3 in
I 1}� I f l/
�d '✓� � I7a / d �
ti II L
.See SUJj►7e. Aa Jc,� •:�P3r97 Werlc ��JPe � � 1110,U,a9t
Je r7 F

S W I N E L A G O O N D E S I G N.
Operator,_ LN� County: ,� Date:
Distance to nearest residence (other- than owner):
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
sows ( farrow to 'finish)
sows (farrow to feeder)
;i 000�
ahead (finishing only)
sows (farrow to wean)
head (wean to feeder)
feet
x 1417
-lbs.
= lb5
x 522
lbs.
= lbs
x 135
lbs.
.z70 a o 0
= lbs
x 433
lbs.
= lbs
x 30
lbs.
= lbs
TOTAL _STEADY STATE ' LI VE- WEIGHT (SSLW) =
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
.270,400
--- I b s
a�oo�
Volume = lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)Ilb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)Ilb. SSLW= - --1.0� CFllb. SSLW
Volume - a7000� cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = jv � cubic feet
,�201000 �olfsoc 7reol rvvol neecltcl

Inside top length feet ; Inside top width feet
Top of dike at elevation feet
Freeboard -feet ; Side slopes : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation feet
Seasonal high water table elevation feet
Total design volume using pcismoidal formula
SS/ENDI SS/END2 SS/SIDEI SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH 4
(AREA OF TOP)
WIDTH DEPTH
(AREA OF BOTTOM)
(AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] DEPTH/6
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = CU. FT.

5, TEMPORARY S10RAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width = - ---- -.-. -- - —
square feet
TOTAL DA= square feet
3
Design temporary storage period to be
5A. Volume of waste produced
days.
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
��000a
Volume = Lbs. SSLW r CF of Waste/Lb./Day * < n — days
Volume = cubic feet

Llf)e D i wd:)W—
5C.
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = gallons/day
Volume cubic feet
Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
6 o days excess rainfall - s:6 a inches
- h 11 A �7
QO o lr�c. �- 4- A,,-, !7r'ke-
i��Xao� 57957s ��-
Volume = s60 _ in DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = a4,5%2 cubic feet = /Poo cuyj.
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = _ 6�inches / 12 inches per foot * DA S; g5-7
Volume='T_Cublc feAt;'z7 ,/.Z/s��u.
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
;z2.,032_
5A. cubic feet wash, PVoduc-eJ
5B. cubic feet 1-4-
5 C, . cubic feet ExJ ��E� ��o3z w��"
5D . .s cubic feet �es
y
TOTAL cubic feet
8 � sly

' l
6 , SUMMARY
Total required volume cubic feet
3c4 f//,, 4s 30 s ub i c feet
,hd �a1� �s6, ia7 c.4.
Min. req, treatment volume plus sludge ac-cumulation cubic feet
a 5 �c feet ; Volume is /n��3o9 cubic feet (end pumping)
% At elev. 3 ,
ects5 Ra+n
33 4
Total design volume less E5yr-24hr storm is cubic feet
d IS3 3Y/
�At elev, cQ feet ; Volume is ' cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation 37 feet
7, DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
BATE: DATE:
)86, ray
s�?g 6
M. / S71i�w
rp1vm+e
a 3 L /r
-� J Cv. Fyda
m'e
r
� Ya .�cr �f
p
!- }fit f'�S RA i 0
• r� CN- �f
/`tee -jC�-
S/.J3 r»ay Letemc a- r-o�le/n
Aj
-/3le"1 (41asif- foes ;ETC �o/� /
Qnr1 �`�.113 d�:cr �)rDw'�j�i
I /
�+ %rl�%
�F
/)c'L`
. a), /tr ,,, i7V� � /� USec
7R4'5 4 b0 Q-. e.-T 4- f `
1 �v/►/
S,Qra y T1e';r
r

IRRIGATION CALCULATIONS
SOIL NIT IRRIG BUFF USE
'RACT FIELD ACRES TYPE CROP LBS/AC GROUP RATE/HR BUFFER AREAS ACRES ACRES
��■�■��rr�
��
j
MMMMW
,c..
0

North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service
Agri -Waste Management
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina Universit
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSTS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of
manure from different locations using nonmetallic
collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface
crust avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic
collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both
ends into manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a
thumb over end of conduit) trapping manure that
has entered lower end, remove and empty slurry
into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
C. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at
least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample
container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid
manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsample from about 5 pit locations, from
agitator pump or from manure spreader and place in a
plastic bucket.
*Professor and -Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural
Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze or transfer to lab
quickly.
Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer.
If mailed,.protect sample container with packing material such
as newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper and tape.
Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available.
Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc.
7621 Whitepine Road
Richmond, VA 23237
Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
iii. Polyfoam Packers
2320 S. Foster Ave.
Wheeling, 1L 60090
Ph: (312) 398-01 10
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Ave.
Ft Atkinson, WI 53538
Private analytical labs are also available, but sample analysis
costly.
The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P. 0. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4.00 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with
sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey
breaders, brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown
on litter; etc.)
C. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, 'liquid slurry;
swine -pit slurry, lagoon _iiaid, sludge; broiler -
house litter, stockpile)
iv. Routine analysis performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca,
Mg, Na, S, Fe,
Mn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analysis performed upon request: DM, Mo, Cd,
Ni, Pb

Attachment B
Page 2 of 3
C. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lago__on Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of__recycled lagoon liauid from inflow
pipe to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From Lagoon
a. ace a small bottle SiL2 pint or less] on end of
10-151 pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c . Brush away f tirn_g__ssUM_gr debris,._
d. Subme �bo_t-tle-ritb I I vf_1i.quid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times
around lagoon, mix and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic
samplesontainer. � �
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House Litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality
e.g., areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate
percent of floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations
proportionate to item a. E.g., if 20% of litter
of similar visual quality is around feeders and
waters, take 1 subsample there and the other 4
subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6"
area down to earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix
and add about 2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample
container such as a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From Stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18"
into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and
seal.
11. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed.
residues from container with clean water but do not use
disinfectants, soaps or treat in any other way.
s
i
i

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production ( ) Vegetative or wooded buffers;
I i Recommended best management
practices;
i(,41 ood judgment and common sense
Anima[ body surfaces Dirty manure -covered animals 1,*�ry floors
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors (# lotted floors;
Uratarers located over slotted floors;
( ) Feeders at high and of solid floors;
I I Scrape manure buildup from floors;
{ I Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits Urine ( requent manure removal by flush,pit
recharge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition ( I Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans Volatile gases; an maintenance;
Dust { fficient air movement
Indoor surfaces Dust
"lush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid whiles tanks are filling
(LrYWashdown between groups of animals
{ ) Feed additives;
( I Feeder covers;
( 1 Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
( I Flush tank covers
(I Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys Agitation during wastewater ( nderfloor flush with underfloor
conveyanance ventilation
Pit recharge points Agitation of recycled lagoon (I Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations Agitation during sump tank filling ( ) Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater i ) Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon Agitation during wastewater i I Extend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions
Biological mixing
Agitation
M'Proper lagoon liquid capacity
{ I Correct lagoon startup procedures
{) nimum surface area -to -volume ratio
11nimum agitation when pumping
( I Mechanical aeration
l i Proven biological additives
,11
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation i Irr gate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft (i nimum recommended operation pressure
(rl'P mp intake Haar lagoon liquid surface
( Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--November 11. 7996

torage tank or basin Partial microbial decomposition ( 1 Bottom or midlevel loading
surface Mixing while filling ( I Tank covers
Agitation when emptying (1 Basin surface mats of solids
C I Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobial decomposition { I Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling level
Agitation when emptying (i Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading ( ) Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions (1 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
(1 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry Volatile gas emissions while drying (1 Soil infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces (1 Soil incorporation within 48 hours
(1 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition ( Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Carcass decomposition (1 Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits
( ) Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion ( I Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage k*1'3rade and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter /
'lanure tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
.ads from farm access
Additional Information:
Available From:
Swine Manure Management: 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 1 28-88
NCSU-SAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Russ --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 1 29.88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-SAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment: EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have been reviewed with me.
4_1
" (Landowner Signature)
AMOC--November 11, 1996

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source
Cause
BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liquid Systems)
Flush Gutters
Accumulation of solids
Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
solids from gutters as designed.
{) Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids
( aintain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative
Decaying vegetation
•( Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter,
{Dry Systems)
Feeders Food Spillage [ Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g..
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
{ ] Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer, 1 5-30 day interval during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues ( educe moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
{) Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes {) Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal.
(] Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).
AMIC--Novamber 11, 1996

dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes 1 I Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7.10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
1 M Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
} Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
in filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
i
,
^
J
(Landowner Signature)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613.
AMIC--November 11, 1996

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) 5cc.-5 71 -y700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) 91r, -ir,_ 31
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) all -189 -S3gl
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) _ gj5-.10 S-3ft
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES) C 13 - 20 _ SUeo
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
1 . Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate• further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
1

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: {;-5 , 5
b. Phone: gist -999 -
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
2

MORTALITY MANAG`MENT METHODS
(check which method(s) a.—= being implemented)
{ ) Burial three feat beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledce of the death. T'-= burial be at leas: 300 fee; from
any flowing steam or public body of water.
( ✓� Rendering at a rendering pianz iice.nsed under G. S. 1006-1163.7
{ ) Complete incineration
{ ) In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Deparv, � ;e-. , of Agriculture.
{ ) Any method which in the profess<o:nal opinion of the Stara
Veterinarian would make passiiot she salvage of pat of a dead
animals value without endangerir'c human or animal heaith. (Writen
Gpprovei of the State Veterinarian must be a7mched)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 5, 1999
John Thornton
Thornton Swine 1-4
731 West Darden Rd
Clinton NC 28328
MW
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510106
Thornton Swine 1-4
Swine Waste Collection, Treatinent,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear John Robert Thornton:
In accordance with your application received on January 5, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to John Thornton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
ANVG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Thornton Swine 1-4, located in Johnston County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2000 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW__,'vIP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in -the General Permit, the facility's CAWtiAP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to tine. CANVM_ P and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violati6n -of `Che'ferms and conditions specified in this COC, `the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result -ih the"ievocati6h .of this COC,..or penalties in acc6rcipn. with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C irit1dt ng civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification. by the Division of this COC's expiration, yoQ shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, Nor k Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/.10°l post -consumer paper

2.3 Acreage cleared and 'available for ap pI ieadon (ext:ludin s alb required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system):ZS'a -,`Required Acreage (as listed in the A\k14P): �`J•(�` s-. ,2 w.. a4 9-0•/.!!<
2.4 Number <ig'orage ponds (circle which is a;iplic•3bfe):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within JUO' of3ny of ilte application fields? YES o .'VO {please circle one'}
',6 Are subsurface drains present in the vici.niry or under the lagoon(s)? YES <01\ (please circle one)
"_.7 .Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, MRCS Standards. etc.) (Swine Onlv)
�r NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and Iagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application arras were sited"
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please utdlcate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. i
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one cope of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations; 137
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied; —./.T _.._-_... _.
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAV; W), if the facility
does not have a CAN&NM', it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAW vlP must include the follcnving components. Some of these components naq}' not
have been required at the rime the facility was cerrifred but should be added to the
C44':10for permitringpurposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (W'UP) roust include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.1 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fit -Ids (e.g, irrigation,
infection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on es•ery land application field.
3.3.E The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required MRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schernatic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Jnsest Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Contrul Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3,3.14 itifortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon: storage pond capacity documentation (dt.sign, calculatiotis, etc.). Please be
sure to mciude any site evaluations, wetlsnd determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility,
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
1fvour CAWN P includes any components not shover on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: A NVO-G-E 040-7/99 Page 2 of 4
13
pww �f P�r`r�"J

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date: -2-f S1 `fit
Completed Certification Form; Date:
Waste Utilization Plan; Date: 3b 98
Amount of lant available nitrogen rdduced/used annuals q6 Ibs
—� Dominant ail series: 9 - A , y ( )
Crops to be grown: C gc v.,jo �tf
r
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= )
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1/93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Type of irrigation: T ave ing Gu id- Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
` Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
T Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1/96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
REQUIRED RECORDS effective 9/1/96
Waste application records (IRR 1&2)
Annual soil sample reports for 1999
(Cu index: }
(Zn index: }
PERMi D FACILITIES
General Permit & COC on site
weekly lagoon level records
_Z Waste analysis - date last taken z7 99
PAN lbs/1000 gals. for str ture #1
PAN lbs/1000 gals. for structure #2

FACILITY NUMBER
FARM NAME:
REVIEWER:
DATE:
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN
POND - PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
`.'. sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS:
WUP -.Days of temporary storage:
w Calcs• Days of temporary storage:.
Top of dike elevation: ft. 1" 25 yr.124 hr. storm in,--,,
Elev, below structural & storm storage: ft. 2"d 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
Normal operating water level elevation: ft. Structural freeboard in.
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation: ft.
Permanent storage volume ft3
Temporary storage volume ft3
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi): Design
Recorded
Flow (gpm): Design
Recorded
Application Rate (in/hr): Design .
Nozzle/Ring Size(s): Design
Design'
Design
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3 -F-4
3,
Water level reading
Sti
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

I
q7--q IlL F
LA CoorJ
Iyo
a
Ira
3� b6 34 /60
Nil
qD
30 so
40
�Ililji
30
—too —100 -so
qD

0AJ
3s,
1/0 ____ - I A
30
Ll)+ P(" sc
�3-
o
46
! �7)
7
3.lr
Sb /DO
3�
100
fil
30 w
4-
31)
3g) _/00 ZV <__ 3 � -/00 0
ot 0 ') �
so Ice