310791_Inspection_20181008

V r7 i y't _�'
40 Division of Water Resources
Facllity Number ®- ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection - 0 Operation Review Structure Evalua
Reason for Visit® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emer e
Date of Visit: Yln I fST Arrival Time: Departure Time:
Farm Name: o-N t Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Other
County:
Onsite Representative: Ja Jr'( `'1 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to Finish
to Feeder
rto Finish
vto Wean
vto Feeder
v to Finish
Gilts
Other
Other
Latitude:
Denied Access
Region:
Phone: 91°I252 213k.9
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I]Layer
Non--
La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other.
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Yes Y-' No NA NE
Ej Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes [::]No
Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
[� NA NE
TO NA NE
[)D NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Numb r: Date of Inspection: b
Waste -Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[DNA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): [ q,
Observed Freeboard (in): 30
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E�bNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
00 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ vrdence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � V A , , 4 d a" 6
13. Soil Type(s)-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
32 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
rM No
❑ NA �NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No--
T
n NA
[:]NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
C t)No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checkbsts ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections C9 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes [—]No ❑ NA RNE
Page 2 of 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
VFailure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other.
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Ely No ❑ NA MiNE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA " NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
f?—( �t / 47L L::o.r � I-
S1UI'v— S�1rJe� nore- C0-cj
50; `1s c i;� e 21,019
VIP
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of
r2 t:p rcL
u� v e n,o �► � ZQ��
J'- r,,o,'r b'(3%V
Phone: 61 W 16-7.4/
Date:
2/4 01