HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000548_Inspection for Mod to Remove SW006 SW009 SW023_20190513Permit: NCS000548
SOC:
County: Catawba
Region: Mooresville
Contact Person: Rick Roper
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 01/24/17 Expiration: 04/30/20 Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Marshall Steam Station
INC Hwy 150
Title: Station Manager
Certification:
Related Permits:
NC0004987 Duke Energy Carolinas LLC - Marshall Steam Station
Terrell INC 28682
Phone: 828-478-7600
Phone:
Inspection Date: 05/13/2019 Entry Time: 01:OOPM Exit Time: 02:30PM
Primary Inspector: James D Moore Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Inspection Type: Technical Assistance
Page 1 of 3
Permit: NCS000548 Owner - Facility: Duke Energy Carolinas LLC
Inspection Date: 05/13/2019 Inspection Type: Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Based on the inspection the MRO staff recommends that outfalls SW006, SWO09 and SW023 be removed from permit
NCS000548.Physical changes have been at the facility which no longer would require sampling at these locations. See the
April 5, 2019 letter from Duke Energy for further justification.
Page 2 of 3
Permit: NCS000548 Owner - Facility: Duke Energy Carolinas LLC
Inspection Date: 05/13/2019 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Outfalls 006, 009 and 023 were inspected and based on physical changes at the facility they are
no longer recommended for sampling.
Page 3 of 3