20050653 Ver 1_Complete File_20050418

O(lb,wla O? WAT G
?
O 'C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 28, 2005
American Uniform Sales, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Rajan Shamdasini
321 East Russell Street
Fayetteville, NC 28305
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0653
Cumberland County
Subject Property: Lakeside at Snow Hill Residential Development in Fayetteville, NC
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Shamasini:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.23 acres of wetlands and 20 feet of streams for the purpose of installing a
sanitary sewer line at the subject property, as described within your application dated March 11, 2005 and
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on April 18, 2005. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3374 (GC3374). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 12 when issued
by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to
proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 20 (feet)
404/LAMA Wetlands 0.23 (acres)
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NorthCarolina
,11 afara!!y

American Uniform Sales, Inc.
Page 3 of 3
April 28, 2005
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh at 919-
733-9721 or Ken Averitte in the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office at 910486-1541.
Sincerely,
AW Klcbk/bs
Enclosures: GC 3374
Certificate of Completion

cc: Harold Brady, Mulkey Engineers, Post Office Box 33127, Raleigh, NC 27636
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 05-0653 Lake Side at Snow Hill (Cumberland) 401
.. -,
MULKEY
ENOINEERS & CONSULTANTS
PO Box 331 27 D
RALEIGH, NC 27636 APR Y 8 2005
PHONE: 919-B51-1912
FAx: 919-B51-191B t; ,Eps ',VVATER AL?TY
aZsra?.,I° rALITy
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Ms. Cyndi Karoly Date: April 12, 2005
NC DENR/Division of Water Quality -
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleiqh, NC 27699-1650 REGULAR MAIL
Re: Proposed sewer line extension associated
with proposed Snow Hill Residential
Development
I am sending you the following item(s):
Job No.:
2004249.00
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 7 copies of NWP12 permit application submittal.
$200 check for NCDWQ certification processing fee.
These are transmitted as checked below:
? As requested
® For approval
? For review and comment
Remarks:
Copy to:
? For your use
? For Signatures
1-1
Signed:
Harold Brady
Project Biologist
Ali U LEI K E
CNG1NCC;2L CON:3ULTANT ;
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
DATE: April 11, 2005
ATTENTION: Ms. Lillette Granade
USACE Regulatory Project Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed Sanitary Sewer Collector Line for Lakeside at Snow Hill
Residential Development in Fayetteville, Cumberland County
Please find attached the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
for the referenced project. American Uniform Sales, Inc. has proposed to construct a new
location sanitary sewer line that will involve the crossing of one jurisdictional stream
channel and associated jurisdictional wetlands. This work will result in unavoidable
temporary impacts to an unnamed tributary of Rockfish Creek and associated
jurisdictional riparian wetlands. Approximately 20 linear feet of stream channel and 0.23
acres of jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted. The purpose of the project is to provide
municipal sanitary sewer service to the proposed residential development. The
anticipated let date for this proposed project is April 2005.
The stream and wetland crossing will involve the placement of an 8" single-barrel
PVC pipe. The placement of this sanitary sewer pipe will involve the excavation of a
trench approximately 4 to 10 feet deep, depending upon the topography of the existing
grade. Once the trench has been dug, a stone bedding material comprised of No. 57
washed stone will be placed beneath the pipe. The trench will then be backfilled with
original material and the surface returned to existing grade. Topsoil will be stockpiled
separately during the excavation of the trench and placed on the surface during the
backfilling process. Per Cumberland County Public Works Commission (PWC)
regulations, an anti-seep collar will be installed on the sanitary sewer pipe at 150-foot
increments to prevent a change in subsurface hydrology along the pipe. All coupling of
the pipes will be at least two feet (horizontal distance) from the edge of the stream bank.
Design alternatives were considered for the location of this stream and wetland crossing;
however, the proposed location was selected because it is at a nearly straight section of
stream channel. This would allow for a single, perpendicular crossing with minimal
stream impacts.
In order to meet the purpose and need of the proposed undertaking it was not
feasible to avoid crossing the subject stream. This linear feature transacts a large part of
the local landscape. Although it was not possible to avoid the stream, serious efforts
were expended to design a crossing that would minimize stream impacts. The proposed
design takes advantage of a perpendicular crossing opportunity with minimal impacts to
the overall stream system.
MULKEY INC. 6750 TRYON ROAD CARY. NO 2751 1 PO 0Ox 33127 RALEIGH. NO 27636 PH: 919-©51-1912 FAX: 919-©51-1910 WWW.MULKEYINC.COM
The project is located within the Cape Fear River subbasin 03-06-15. One
unnamed tributary (UT) to Rockfish Creek constitutes the surface waters within the
project area. The UT to Rockfish Creek is depicted as a blue-line stream on the USGS
Hope Mills, NC topographic quadrangle map and has been confirmed to have federal
jurisdiction by the USACE because the stream displays signs of subsurface input and bed
and bank structure. Mulkey biologist, Harold Brady, met with Ms. Lillette Granade in
October 2004 to conduct the jurisdictional determination and confirm that the UT to
Rockfish Creek is a jurisdictional waterbody. Rockfish Creek flows into the Cape Fear
River approximately 5.0 miles east of the project area. The North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) has assigned a best usage classification of "C" to Rockfish
Creek. The NCDWQ stream index number is 18-31-(23) and the USGS hydrologic unit
is 03030004. There are no high quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters
(ORW), drinking water supply waters (WS-1 and WS-II), or 303(d) listed streams within
a one-mile radius of the project study area.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has identified five
Endangered (E) species (red-cockaded woodpecker, American chaffseed, Michaux's
sumac, pondberry, and rough-leaved loosestrife) and one Threatened species due to a
similarity of appearance (T(S/A)) (American alligator) for which occurrences have been
recorded in Cumberland County. The land that will be impacted as a result of this project
consists of Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood wetland forest and young loblolly pine
stands (10-15 years old).
Suitable habitat for the American alligator consisting of slow moving rivers and
marshes is present within the project area; however, no individuals were
observed during a survey for alligator nests throughout the project area.
Therefore, the project will have No Effect on the American alligator.
Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) does not exist within
the project area. No pine dominated stands of appropriate diameter or age are
present in the project area, and the forest floor is generally too thick to provide
adequate foraging land. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) has
mapped one population of RCW approximately 1.25 miles west of the project
area.
• Suitable habitat for the American chaffseed consisting of wet longleaf pine
sandhills and pine savannas subject to fires do exist within the project area.
• Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present at the project site, especially
along a small section of power line easement within the project study area. A
survey for the Michaux's sumac was conducted in July 2004. No individuals
were observed; therefore, this project will have No Effect on Michaux sumac.
• Suitable habitat for pondberry consisting of areas along the margins of sinks or
natural depressions is present within the project study area. A survey was
conducted for pondberry in early March 2005. No individuals were observed;
therefore, this project will have No Effect on pondberry.
• The rough-leaved loosestrife is typically found in open areas along the edges of
longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins. Suitable habitat is not present
within the project area.
Attached are copies of the proposed residential development plan, the sanitary
sewer collector line (profile and plan view), and associated stream and wetland data
forms. Following your review and concurrence with the proposed action, please issue a
NWP 12 that will authorize construction activities associated with the sanitary sewer line
pipe placement on the proposed Lake Side at Snow Hill residential development. If you
have any questions or comments concerning the project, please contact me at (919) 858-
1804. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
'X
Harold M. Brady
Project Scientist
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
Attachments
PCN
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Permit Drawings
Erosion Control Plan
Copy of Jurisdictional Determination
Stream and wetland forms
cc: Mr. Ken Averitte, NCDWQ - Fayetteville
Mr. Rajan Shamdasani, American Uniform Sales, Inc.
Mr. Scott Beasley, Crawford Design Company
Ms. Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ - Raleigh

APR 1 8 2005
APF'o I-,
1z ADS QUALITY Form Version May 2002
Office Use Only: AW STORM WER 6RAt,CH
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. Raian Shamdasani
Mailing Address: American Uniform Sales. Inc.
321 East Russell Street
Fayetteville, NC 28305
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: raianshamdasani(a,yahoo.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Lake Side at Snow Hill Sanitary Sewer Collection Line
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): American Uniform Sales, Inc. Tax ID9 0434-
04-5434: 0434-03-5205; 0434-92-2143. Deed Book: 6418, page: 634
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Fayetteville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From I-95 South, turn right onto
Snow Hill Road (Exit 44). Make the second left to stay on Snow Hill Road, and make the
immediate next left. Follow this road straight onto the subject property. The sewer line work
will be in the western portion of the property.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 34° 58' 03.21" N 78°53' 55.57"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
64 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rockfish Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently forested with young pine (10-15
Page 2 of 9
years old) with hardwood species and a thick understory laver in the wetland areas. Small
dirt access roads are located throughout the southern portion of the property, and two ponds
are located near the eastern portion of the property. The stream that must be crossed is good
quality with little to no bank erosion throughout.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Approximately 2,600 feet of new location sanitary sewer line will be constructed with a
single stream crossing near Station 18+40. Standard sanitary sewer construction equipment
including dump trucks, excavators, and a bulldozer will be used to construct the sanitary
sewer. This sanitary sewer line will connect with an existing line along Rockfish Creek.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a sanitary sewer system for the
proposed Lakeside at Snow Hill Residential Development.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACE Action ID No. 200500142, associated with a Jurisdictional Determination dated
November 11, 2005.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 3 of 9
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed i
23 acres
The sanitary sewer line will
iurisdictional wetland. In addition,
approximately 20 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel will be temporarily impacted by
the placement of the sewer line pipe approximately 10 feet below the existing stream bed.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below: N/A
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
I Excavation and
clearing 0.23 yes adjacent Coastal Plain Bottomland
Hardwood Wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://µlvw.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 13.38 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.23 acre (10,107 ft2)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
( leases eci )
2 Excavation and
clearing 20 UT to Rockfish Creek 5 feet perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 4 of 9
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wlvw.uses. gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., wwwy.topozone.com,
ww-\v.mae9uest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 20 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: N/A
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
Name Wat)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-doN n valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
This stream and wetland can not be avoided and still achieve the goals of the proiect.
Impacts to the stream have been minimized by locating the proposed crossing at a position where
the stream will only be crossed once and perpendicular. Due to the sinuosity of the stream this
location minimizes impacts that would be caused at other locations by crossing at the straightest
Page 5 of 9
section with only a single crossing required. The wetland impacts have been minimized by
locating the sanitary sewer line along the edae of the wetland boundary.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnnaide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If use of
Page 6 of 9
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ? *Minimum Criteria Checklist if attached
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
There is currently no impervious surface within the proposed sanitary sewer line corridor. No
impervious surface is anticipated as a direct result of this sanitary sewer line project. Estimations
as to the future impervious surface throughout the proposed development as an indirect result of
this sanitary sewer line are unknown at this time. Storrnwater runoff will be controlled along the
sanitary sewer impact area by silt fencing during construction and reseeding immediately after
construction.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by construction of the new location roadway.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional);
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow proeessi.ng time .for these permits, However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
worlc schedules draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
shk105,
,pplicant&A-ent's Sig;ature Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided,)
Page 9 OF 9
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200500142 County: Cumberland U.S.G.S. Quad: Hone Mills
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Raian Shamdasni
Address: 321 East Russell Street
Favetteville, NC 28305
Telephone No.:
Agent: Harold Brady
Mulkev Eneineers & Consultants
Post Office Box 33127
Raleip_h, NC 27636
[phone]
Property description:
Size (acres) 80 acres Nearest Town Favetteville
Nearest Waterway UNT to Rockfish Creek River Basin Cane Fear River
USGS HUC Coordinates N 34.9678 W 78.8988
Location description The property is located adiacent to an unnamed tributary to Rockfish Creek, bordered on the west
by Rockhurst Drive, at the end of Mvron Road, north of Research Drive, south of Favetteville, Cumberland County.
North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC 4 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The wetland on vour nronertv have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corns. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified
by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA iurisdiction
on vour nronerty which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied unon
for a period not to exceed rive vears.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC at [phone] to determine
their requirements. o
Q
Page 1 of 2
Action ID: Q0CS00IYa
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Lillette Granade at (910) 2514829.
Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual
and is ad'lacent to an unnamed tributary to Rockfish Creek, a tributary of the Cape Fear River. Determination is based
on information provided by Harold Brady of Mulkey Eneincers & Consultants and a field visit by Lillette Granade on
October 7. 2004.
Remarks: ?Q e
Corps Regulatory Official: Aze,61?
Date November 11, 2004 Expiration Date November 11, 2009
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial):
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
• A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form
• A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form
• If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the
"Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form.
Page 2 of 2
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Ra'an Shamdasani File Number: 200500142 Date: November 11, 2004
At tached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at http:/hv<vw.usace.amiy.inil,'inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Mr. Arthur Middleton, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
w
•, Trailer I Fw

•

-
Park

ti Munr q a

Grann,

• LA*
/
i s Cem ?--Z

-.-
..*L
- corw
let (l• •?
P
C /?/l

raj S
y4n

i

1 ?;. Cem

\

.:
: IPA . •? Sandpt3

137 t
FWA
?Q1
\\•
/' •
j

too I
S. "a Ch

G
: • , Project Site
SW*"
r M.
P
alk
/
U
e -?2 Rockjtsh

` ;? I ! rem ?¢
--_ _ - k
•'_? l w t ro
Johit
FIJI
•• •U? -'? ..?_i-?- ti? ? to y b? ` ', +.:`? ':
s •vT i•? 2' - i 3w
N
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 j
, r
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Quadrangle:
Hope Mills, NC
Contour Interval 10 Feet , •
Prepared for: VICINITY MAP
Mr. Rajan Shamdasani PROPOSED SNOW HILL Figure
Prepared by: DEVELOPMENT
Mulkey Engineers CUMBERLAND COUNTY
and Consultants 1
NORTH CAROLINA
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION It - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Mr. Arthur Middleton, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Proposed Snow Hill Residential Developmen
Applicant/O%%mer: Mr. Raian Shamdasani
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes HN-o
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes (If needed, explain on reverse)
Date:
County:
State:
Community ID:
TransectID:
Plot ID:
7/16/2004
Cumberland
NC
PFO
WA
IVA17
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum tree FAC 9.
2. Pinus toeda tree FAC 10.
3. flex verticillata shrub FACii' 11.
4. .4undinaria,gieantea herbaceous F.4CIV 12.
5. Lvonia lucida shrub F.4CII' 13.
6. flex glabra shrub FACW 14.
7. Magnolia virginiana tree FACIV+ 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marls
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
x Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Welland associated with a large pond in the headiraters of a small tributary to Rockfish Creek.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) faucluse loamv sand Drainage Class: 9'ell Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descrintion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-1 A 2.5rR 412 fine sandv loam
1-12+ B 2.5YR 611 coarse loamv sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
z Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
N
? Y
i
il
P
H
d
S
Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Is this Sam
lin
es
o
r
c
o
s
resent
y p
g
Remarks:
plot taken --15' downslope of WA 17.
1 1
tlt/tllvvcu uy
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Proposed Snow Hill Residential Developmen
Applicant/Owner: Mr. Raian Shamdasani
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes HN.
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes on

Date: 7/16/2004
County: Cumberland County
State: NC
Community ID: upland
TransectID:
Plot ID: ii'A17
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Nvssa svlvatica tree FAC 9.
2. Ouercus stellata tree FACU 10.
3. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 11.
4. Pinus taeda tree FAC 12.
5. Clethra alnifolia shrub FACU' 13.
6. Magnolia vir,£iniana tree FACIV+ 14.
7. /lexdecidua shrub FACIi= 15.
8. Sassafras albidum shrub FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 75°0
Remarks: Dominated byfacultative plants.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
S No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 2-6% slope
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) I aucluse loamy sand Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
(Sub
rou
)
Taxonom ic Ha
ludults
T Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Flo
p
y
g }p
p
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 7.5YR 412 sand
5-12+ B 10)R616 loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: Plot taken approximately 15 feet uphill of WA3.
I I
Approvea oy riyuwA%_z.)iyz
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Proposed Snow Hill Residential Developmen Date: 7/16/2004
Applicant/ONNmer: Mr. Rajan Shamdasani County: Cumberland
Investigator(s): H. Bradv State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes HN Transect ID: YIB
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: WB7
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum tree FAC 9.
2. dfaenolia virginiana tree FACW+ 10.
3. Ilex verticillata shrub FACW 11.
4. 4undinaria gieantea herbaceous FACIV 12.
5. Lvonia lucida shrub FAC1V 13.
6. Ilex ,elabra shrub F,4CW 14.
7. A'vssa stlvatica tree F.4C 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC- ). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
x Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 8 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland associated irith a small pond in the headwaters of a small tributary to Rockfish Creek.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Vaucluse loanry sand Drainage Class: 14'ell Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-1 A 2.5YR 412 fine sandv loam
1-12+ B 2.578 611 coarse loamv sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Organics found throughout.
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [Y-] No
Remarks:
plot taken -10' downslope of UT 7.
1 1
Approves by HyUJAC F- }ty[
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Proposed Snow Hill Residential Developmen
Applicant/Owner: A1r. Raian Shamdasani
Investigator(s): H. Bradv
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes HN..
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes (If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 7/16/2004
County: Cumberland County
State: NC
Community ID: upland
Transect ID:
Plot ID: WB7
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ntssa n1vatica tree FAC 9.
2. Ouercus stellata tree FACU 10.
3. Smilax rotundifolia mine FAC 11.
4. Pinus iaeda tree FAC 12.
5. Clethra alnifolia shrub FACIV 13.
6. Afacnolia virginiana tree FACIV+ 14.
7. flex decidua shrub FAC R'- 15.
8. Sassafras albidum shrub FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 75%
Remarks: Dominated byfaculiative plants.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 6-10% slope
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Vaucluse loamy sand Drainage Class: ifell Drained
Field Observations
Taxonom
(Sub
rou
) ic Ha
ludults
T Confirm Mapped Type? Yes FN jo
y
p
g p
yp
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 7.51R 412 said
3-12+ B 1038 616 loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: Plot taken approximately 20feet uphill of WB7.
I I
Approvcu oy nyuwrrk,c xyz
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Proposed Snow Hill Residential Developmen
Applicant/Owner: Mr. Raian Shamdasani
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 7/16/2004
County: Cumberland
State: NC
Community ID: PFO
Transect ID: II'C
Plot ID: TVCB63
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum tree FAC 9.
2. Magnolia vir,Qiniana tree FACTV+ 10.
3. Ilex vertieillata shrub F,4CIV 11.
4. Arundinaria gieantea herbaceous FACiV 12.
5. Lvonia lucida shrub FACiV 13.
6. Cirilla racemi/lora shrub FACIV 14.
7. Clethraalnifolia shrub FACIV is.
8. Smilax laurifolia vine FACTT'+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
,Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
a No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
x Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Metland associated irith the riparian area of a small tributary to Rockfish Creek.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Vaucluse loamy sand Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Tjpic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 O organics
2.12+ B Gley pg.2 815PB 7.5YR 618 common, coarse, prom. silty clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The B horizon contains very tight clays.
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken -10' dowmslope of WCB 63.
1 1
Approved by rnlu3Ht-t; .?iyz
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Proposed Snow Hill Residential Developmen
Applicant/0,Amer: Mr. Raian Shamdasani
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes HNo
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes (If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 7/16/2004
County: Cumberland County
State: NC
Community ID: upland
TransectID:
Plot ID: kVCB63
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. A'rssa srhvatica tree FAC 9.
2. Ouercus stellata tree FACU 10.
3. Srmplocos tintictoria shrub FAC 11.
4. Pinus taeda tree FAC 12.
5. Clethra alnifolia shrub FACIV 13.
6. Ilex glabra shrub FACiV 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 83%
Remarks: Dominated byfacultative plants.
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wctland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 2-6% slope
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Vaucluse loamy sand Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonom
(Sub
rou
) ic Ha
ludults
T Confirm Mapped Type? Yes FN .1
y
g
p p
jp
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-1 A 7.5YR 413 sandy loam
1-6 BI IOYR 614 sandv clay
6-12+ B2 IOYR 713 sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: Plot taken approximately 10 feet uphill of WCB63.
I I
Approvea oy nyuz)ru,r..3iyz
I USACE AID# DWQ # Site n (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: .4MErL?G a r/vi?v?zr, r;.?s 6 S 2. Evaluator's name: ?. Q IZA D 1?
3. Date of evaluation: 5/0 f zoos 4. Time of evaluation: //-00 AM
5. Name of stream:- (,j7- 70 /ZLL.E FiSL/ G r.E= 6. River basin: e'-A FE.4 iZ
7. Approximate drainage area: /q/ A? zFs 8. Stream order. / sf
9. Length of reach evaluated: 30 Fr-,F 10. County: GliMaE/L Lqv?
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3'V"SB "0 5, Z / " A/ Longitude ex. -77.556611 78 ? 5-5
5- 7
Method location determined (circle): GPS opo S Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note near y roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
A ?l?lzoX?A-11A7-F4 F 3-1,11-5 voIz n51 c?EsT or'- T 8? G ?c ?.?? oG Z06&," A' G?Z?E
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
IS. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? /?-ED NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: ?? 14ez,55-
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 0 NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: f'% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial Agricultural
70% Forested /0 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (__ )
22. Bankfull width: 5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): fOoT
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _, LGentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): -79 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

? R { ? +1 , ?-, , ?fi 7 ECOREGIO POINT iA
?

v f CHARACTERISTICS
` r

. ,?
4 r
-
Y u}
u

SCORE
: k?
?
?
?
'
? ,
Coastal
...• ,
. ? ..
? .
,,,. ? -ti - ,,.:.. v .a :, ?s ?..?
? : ..
1 f r Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream • _ ,r 0 - 5
t` ??
0 4 0 SF' :
t
=
= 0'
fl
fl , ,,
r
max oln
s
ow
ow or saturation
strong
no
f • 2 t F; Evidence of past human alteration' 0 d ; 5 , 01+ `$ ' ;' L
l
r
01Dts) . c `
extensive alteration= 0; no alteration= max
y : s,y,.:
sr N- r
ai 1?"..`• ?.`.:k , rsa
/
' - 'Riparian zone'.'+ ' y
0 V? vR jy1r , - , `

4 ?. .
.

`
'

-

?

(0

ous wide buffer max omts
onti
o buffer = 0; contiguous
n
: • .
_. ,r ,
.t .
4•-r.?
s Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges`'; >r 4 U `5 fit Gti ?' Q 4 0 ' 4 "
!!..(extensive dischar es 0 `lio'aischar es = max points
j :• 5 Groundwater discharge Q??? ??0 4 r,
0 4
3
no dischar e = 0 springs, seeps wetlands etc:` max points ? k i G w, ,
6 :.Presence,ofadjacentfloodplaiii. L k 0-4 f 0 4 ` 0 2s L/
t
x oi
ive flood El
= in
o flood l
in= 0
e y
s
a
n
am
a
; ext
ns
(n
?, -•. Entrenchment / floodplaln access R
i
•
0
- o
0
4
2
0 /
1 el trenched = 0 fr e uent f]o 'a' niaz oints?
(dee <
. y
z F
r
•, y?
;

,,.... Presence of adjacent wetlands
;: -. .•,
-
,0
6
!
Q 4a
e
.
0 _.2 g4x•li-

i 8 ,
::, t- _
_ no wetlands 0 lar e•ad"acent wetlands max points) .t':
^_
-
7
. ,
,
,
, t
C?

f
9
r -: Channel sinuosity. Y.. i
05

p' 4 "? rY

i t 0 3 a ,' /
/
'

IT'
h?
(extensive channeliiation 0 natural meander - max oints

w '

1. ,.r. YPt 1

j ,
10
e _ Sediment mpu't
'
Y0 5 r,
. ?? 0 ' 4 Y ?f 1
0 toy !?
' e or no sediment = max omts
';• extensive de os?tion= 0 htt l L . P s x y y '? "

r .v Size & diversity of channel bed substrate ?'
4 ?''"?^ cr c
a,
' `D
'
,
ints)
slzes =max
liomo enous = 0 iar e, diverse
' (fine;

12 Evidence of channel incisionor widening - ?`0 5 O r'4`
r,
? • 0 5
r
(deepl incised - O Stable bed' &'banks :. max' oints
"a y =Presence of ma or bank 'fallures
]
=
0
5
4-
13 ,
l
Fk max points
ns
(sevete'""onion = 0; no erosion 'stabla:b
:: 0
5 ti
19 i,
?
.
,_
-
a
Root depth and density on banks
0 4r
5
O '
o
h y z
c s
a ?
mts
out max
no visible roots 0, dense roots throug - y
f
tiImpact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
' ?? ; ?' SFr s
? t
m 5
'
?
•. s?
act =0; no evidence -:max om
?.- substantial -•;+;?
? F.._: zz y ._ _,. r
a, Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
..
`r0 a6
2
r ti (no nffles/np les or Dols O; well develo ed max points) i c _: .
l _

r i
?? ^ hi Habitat complexity
' y
17 '
max Dints) _
-(titt le or no habitat = 0 fre uent vaned habttats . s y
.?
f Cano covers a over streambed a }• L'
71
0 5
i,
18 no shading vegetation = 0 continuous Cano inax Dints n uji ?L a.
c "Substrateenibeddedness 4
? Ak y * , ?'! r
4
0 s
2
4

19
a
re
=
g 1"
mbedd
d'
0
e`st
d
l
;
.
, {
*
? 's;
t
?y x
ructu
m
e
e
.
;
oos
e r 4
•?

, ?
?'- Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)?r°,
r s 0 ' 4
2 s '0 -'S • ' 0 S n
I
,F 20
' ?
no evidence = 0• com mo numerous es-= max Dints _ r
?t? `gin, M , r1? F .
'
21 Presence of amphibians
E,..i:. .,
p 5 a 1 z
p 4,? x
¢

Z
Q oints)
(no evidence.= 0,;common, numerous es = max ?. y? .• t? ' ;,
.a -"Presence offish' , " ??
a n? aM
0-4 hY, z ?; atin
0 4 a s lw fi ,.
0 4k
p - 22 r
t
= "
° r
?+ 0• common,numerous es =max oints) ,=
no evidence -+ y
r r r, " F h

. _
? ?
Evidence•ofw;rildlife use
r

0 6

a
S
'
O y ?
7
4.. r , y
23 ,
no evidence 6 abundant evidence max points
• F
?
y, it ?
_ Y
-
- +.., + r y y s ,.... .? •z .:?'pa rY m ex ,Ya .? ;z .`' TA "`r'."'.ra `CYO-r+t
?"
?J r ?'d
f`
?`'
C" L ?'
?"
? i` a'? ^l` .z .'?'
'??` .1c6 ??? +'c +!`L t7tt^ (?3 ?!?
` (•
1lc 'r?, k ? c r''>> v„ ?`nE.'k,f Y`ti?a..,
}J Y? a-c. ? M.. 4`y^`
lp 7i."L.,?"s'l ?nS ??;
"
.,
`
:4
I ,?r
?41
S
?? ?,?,?, i ? ?'
{.? ?"F'TotalPoints Possible ?•r?
+} _ -
? fi?•?100 ,r, 4
??
F y+1OQ ,
;, 4.••.??dOr ,?`;F s
???? ?s??a
,
?
<fly. r t, ?i.,r Y"`r!:....'r:`" r... tl: t,. ?.y y., y ?? ? r..? ;?i ,, y .r,.,p?` i'=
? r?? 11 Ly,. ?
,.+Vi•?l,?iN.[hw?rxr.-
. ??+?..r :'7.7oi?K.u?..?..?1 • ,
. ab ?:. c,-.
+'s o e ! J : , nl '?..t.F r !:: y '}T ?ds,.'u<4y ?rtit. ?? .: ,? ,? •,? '?'-?+eK??"., ?y,;: fir, ,i ?,.:i:?t-3 gtti.b- E `,pe. =' o-S ????1 ?i ?1
??'t'
bh
' ,? k?+ TOTAL SCORE '
tpa
e) ?K
sf
l
nte
o?
5
F
g
t?g
lIS
z or
e
(a
s
i S-. 1 F
• 1 „-
'
?
-'' ?
'
q
?.
_±,'*n.S
.2..
?, q;:•.5.,. , ?.?_?_ „-Sh}.„
, :a:
?'c V`.r. .. ?. .. , _.t.. .,.?: ? ..t«, ,s-.ti..•r -;,:.. ..,-F.:B, _, ,.,J, `!. .,.-.r;?t?, : ?- s.t?, .i„ .+G._.y n,k
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

\ oo ? /

W I Iv
n I j2

8
' ?
I
I
I ? I u \
^alM-
?
? ? SiA 12?52C1

u-+
Y-YI.,O
0, r W..71 n0 'UP. 1117

INV.-99.4710-
Y iul CF -p FV..tl0.}9 (r N) iNV-99.17 (e CUT)

UJ
I ; cw «Ln?, 1
1
W -?J 0-v 299 (e' IN1 7.3. X00
/ e?
S?
0,0V \
GRAPHIC SCALE
\x`'r
}?
b • 141 >?/?^' N -
_ T ASIA 1") I177
\
TOP. I10.CJ
\
(.FEET)
t ylrn• 50 IL INV.104.77 IX iNl \
\ iM/..99.91 (e' OJT)
\
?YUSE PPE 26E1 \
4-
_ y-
Nj
a
(3 F
36
As-
I
I
I
,
I
I II
I
I
I
11

I
I
I
I
fl
1
VIII
1 if
111
11111
1
1
11
I I I I I I I I II I I III I I I 1 I I 111 I I III I I
I I I 1 1 I I I I I I II II I I III 1 1 II 1 11111 1 11 11111 I I
I I I II II I I I I li! 1 I II II 140
1 I I I I I -(-^L.' 1 I I 1
I I I I I I 1111'. I I
I I I 1 1 I ri l i

I I I I I I I ?• APP i I I I( I 1

LI I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I
? 1 L AA"^!b in
1 1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I 1 II ? I 1 I I Y I I I illi I _II I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I n_ ?^ I l l i 1 I
I
I
I
i I I
I I I I .
?a•
_ I

I
II
<a$zz I I I ?
t 1 I 1 1 ? _ - - n l I I I , 1 1
I I I r I I I I I
( I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I ? I ? ' A I V I I I I I I I I
1 - I I I I! I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I , 5 >= i 1 1 1 i I I I i 1 I I I 1 777
I z3° , I 1 1
1 ? I 1 1 ? ? a =c x
z0
?
I
?i
§a
z?

?
y:
,9l
f
° P
I I
I
I
I
1 ? ` ? o3o
^^ g? ? I I be 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 •
,
•IOr? . 22 N I I I
In

L rv
?
???
? OO
n20rv_
I
I
I
°
I I II I ? I 1 a g atx ?
4
z
a
b
j"
?
-
n b?9
i
? I ?
4 N a / j u 1 I i oS R 3

11
'Y
.x. ?AO C
1 1
I k a
4"
b v
I
I
I ??}
1 inn 5-n'S lu
I I ? _ _ I I 1 1 s
rr
1
I I
I ?w ? F I L n
' 1 1 1
I - I? i V R. I 1 1 l f I I i
;
I Im°^'=? .
36d I I
i i ?i I I I a r ? I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I
l i t I I I 1 1 1 I I I Ae
ll
(
1
?
.y
'
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I t I ? PVC SS * (14 %
I

7

I

I

I

I

-4e.cut

,;
a
e w s

,
I

?

I

I E

..

I,. 175LE A PV

,. C 'S 0 Ix

I

I

1

I

I

I

I

I

I
I

I

I
1
Tue
I
1 I I I t I 11 I
I I I I I I I i I I
- I
I 1 1 1 1 1 I i
- T 7 =
1
IIII
I
I
?
L 4
L L
T
t

I I

I
_ F T T T- - II
I I 1 I , 1
15+09 7ew0 17.00 7e.00 19M0 zolaa 21.09 uwo 41+00 4A00 25w9 :e1o9 27+00
SANUARY SEWER COLLECNR UNE
?? I I
1 I
1 I _
I
d ? / 4+
i 32
1
33
i
CraMxd
91/Nae Sea" ? PaleLbAe.NC
wl.evlamaan . Fe><9tamm1l
..rortatmnaom
At me..yS.pecftemn ord des"
Peosed tv Cwmaa Dwpl Csartl
n IaMaaro of lamb ale e a
ralreL Ole v p" d C-ANd Oft-I
Cdnp" The Owner or " over
paeee ae9E net Use iM wvrt on dl4 or
a7 plops e-M by a plum
ad a>pmprW* cDTVene *m
HALF SIZE
.. Al
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SALE OR CONS1Rll ti

LAKESIDE AT SNOW
HILL, LLC
321E. RusadlStreet
FapmtarMa, NO 25301
Phone: [phone]
n.l..T..TAIL.
PROJECT tAAN1GEA: PSB
tMAriN B1: RGM
APPROVED Sr. PS13
PROJECT NUt98ER: 04M
'.,SANITARY SEWER
COLLECTOR LINE
(2 o12)
..u.
HORZ:1'= 5(r
VERT:1' = S
uv
FEBRUARY 2005
nvn.u..
C12
. IT
Q
'i H
/ to
-? g
v
m
m
m
0
/ - NE. "-3
/ I 4 e 75.59
/ 10P.9/.54
INV •87.5. (5' OIN)
UT
f« 1
ST,x 95.00
0
IN'.
. a.93 ((6• M) . SC0
/ Inv.-54.93 (5' WT) / 9d53 (e'
(USE PPE ALOE) IxV.9d33 IS"
5.00 C,
l
q 549
1! P 00
ss 1.c%
10.1
KMET o 10
I.,,?t
(1ELPCR.R 7.
/ V I b
T I / VICINITY MAP I \
o (NOT10sGU.1
x _ - H I
I
°' s W I
72
s9sm
-? '
541H Ljo
I jl
ruv..p9.30 I
LAj
wad ?`
?.
i ?NI k I
W I
G R A P H I C SCALE Jm
M?
cool I
("FEET)
1 YRdI. 50 R >C I r

o7
i,

;d \ oP.,0ao0( \
STA 9.54.78 W-9788 8- OUT)
\ \ \
NV • ] 4 PS \ \
MV.•80..0 ( W B' "I
N(>r 9too 1 \ 1 \ \
P •92.00 \
TO
MV.-42.99 W IN)
1782.89 (9• WT) \ \l
c
x \
I \?
1 \?
CIS ?- /
\1001
, \ \,b\
\
A c<?_s \
su u+?2ol
\ TCP•n3., 3
INV, 9.27 (a. IN)
\ \ INV.•99.17 (5. OUT) 1
88 \6?, ,,, cis
©\ ??
V^???1' See a?? '?
INV.+10237 (5' IN)
11 T)
DE)
?61 117p I I
1ok
N
_ :95Efi1Fer
I I I I 1 1 I I
, I ; ?
I I I I

ud

I
I

?

-

?
I
L - - r r

1

1 1

1 r
1 J l

I I c I

I I I I I I I I

Eps I
I I
,
I II
I
s
I t
3? da 3 ? ?
_ _ ^
? W
o eno bw
•Q i
I
_tf I
9
Gv
C
?
0
01
[ }
? .
w i El I I x I 1
105- ?- - , ,..• I I Lo
y
+'?amn- ntn?•
+hmnm +Ng°nn i l.
1f N
297.27
E?
5A
009

•
9
1

?°mR'S
o
3m
•
?y$_2?
:WO2a
.r-WO'?
y.
r
r.
1
-

I

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
_? I E% ?
I I .? ? x

-
-
-
?
e
t s
I
- - r r r r I T - Ea 9 ? S
C} I I I ^
p
° I iuo2 I ;0 2? I
I 'm m I 1
} l f" I N
p
l.i
=
1
1 1
II I , L
a ? ,a 1 1
u p l

y
4 ? w.n c
i ??,? o 1e 5 I t
11

e '

I 1

1 1 1

1

1 ,

..

.5

73

C1F

•
IC i5

PV
0 0
.5x
(

J o c

I
I
I

I

I

I

I

I

1
`e+. I
$ ° I I
?1 I I I I I I
I I
III
I
l I I
I
I I I I I I 1 1
I I I ( I I II I
p 1 I
I
I
I I 1 I

L L L L
-
I 11 11
I I
I
I
i
I, 1. I ? , 1 , 1 I I .. .w .. nl '
o. m I
2o I
.ao I,
u .a5 i
u i l l
,W i t
u I
wA 11 100
.? 0100 1M0 2100 51ea
i?
SANITARY SEWER COLLECTOR LINE
to
05
00
e
n
I9
10
75
70
? U.
914Hey Steet a FelelteeAe,71C25305
Vb 910?ZZt-0= • F=g14II1-0M5
AL oeo619& speCAWb11 end deel9n
pub try L7eefivd oeeignCmp"
are heAenrm A SHAM and V, 11
retitle," propeM aT C-ford Daeg1
Coetlnµ The O•rtlr or " oMr
pe5fee ernl not use" Baton this or
orq PI eueot by a p,ooer e"em a
"
HALF SIZE
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SALE OR CONSTRUCTION
o•.u
LAKESIDE AT SNOW
HILL, LLC
121 E. Russell Street
Feyetir"1 , NC 29101
Phow [phone]
none uuue -_-- _?
PROJECTMAXACM: PSB
DRAWN Br" RGM
APPROVED Br. PST!
PROkCTNUMBER: 04029
.... 1 rnu
SANITARY SEWER
COLLECTOR LINE
(1of2)
HORZ 1' = 50'
VER.1•=5'
FEBRUARY 2005
ueerrnu.
GII
e. iT
AcX'
C
O
m
m
m
rZ?4 - `SITE O
/ VICINITY MAP
(MOT TO SCALE)
1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY AND BE RESPCNSBLE 7. A FORMAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT IS
FOR ALL DIMENSIONS ATIHE JOB SITE REQUIRED FOR 11" SITE UNDER THE RFGIAATION3 OF THE NORTH
CAROIRNDEPARRTMENTOF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCCS
2 ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE N REF ERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK (NOXENRI HOWEVER, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO "AD SHALL
AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. BENCHMARK11 FOML7.YALL LOLL STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS TO MINIMIZE
IS AN DOSTING FIRE HYDRANT BOU LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EROSION AND THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENTOFFSITE DURING
SNOW HILL ROAD HAVING AN/SSUMED ELEVATION OF 178. 11 BENCKMARK COUSTRUCTIOrl INCLUDING THE PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
9215 CENTER OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE LID LOCATED ANY MEASURES REOLARED SMALL BE INCLUDED LATHE BID COST W14ETHER
SOUTH OF PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CREEK HAVING AN ELEVATION SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OR NOT.
OF BYOB
A ALL SITE IUPROVF?IENf5SHALL 0E INSTALLED PER CIMBERIAND COUNTY
S ALL CIMENSIONSANOALLELEVATIONS ARE MEASURED TO BACK OF B STATE REQUIREMENTS.
CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
iQ DLSTURBEDAREAS NOT COVERED BY ASPHALT OR OTHER IMPERMEABLE
4. PROJECT LIMITS FOLLOW PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY AND LIMITS OF SURFACES SHALL BE SEECEDAND STABILIZED PER SPECIFICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
11. SURVEY. BASE IMP. 6 TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY COWEN d
5. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES WIVE BEEN TAKEN FROM UTILITY ASSOCIATES NC-(9T0)223-T7M
RECORDS SUPPLEMENTED BY FIND INSPECTIONS AND SHOULD INDICATE IN
GEMFAALTHETYPE OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES NOW N SERVICE
LOCATIONS SHCWH ARE NOT GUARANTEED. DEVELOPERS OR CONTRACTORS
SMALL NOT ONLY MAKE SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS BUT SHALL ALSO
ALLOW FOR DONTNGENCESW ITCH MIGHT ARISE BY REASON OF
ENCOUNTERING UNRECORDED LINES OR LINES BONG IN DIFFERENTLOCATDNS
THAN INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OR
EXCAVATION ON THE SITE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL
UTILITY COMPANES TO VERIFYANOOR FIELD-LOCATE THOR RESPECTIVE
UTILITIES ALL DAMAGE INCURRED TO EXISTING UTILITY LINES DURNG
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED LATHE GENERAL CONTRACTORS EXPENSE
6. ALLWASMWTERIALEl4LLBELECAILYDISPOCEDCFOFFSrrF-
B S.
Z:- KL, ' OS-I
AsSs B STONE
(SNT Cis. #38)
yNIS SECt;OiIZr'ie PPi-R J DISS-2 _'?\\ \ \ \,
I e nEADwALL r0 BE ?-?.r 55 R STONE (eo-6')_ ? `L\
.A I [R+a'UpEO BEFCRC 121. 6'w
I 75EOIMENT TRAP IS REMOVED. I S.T. cis. 138)
t ) I I L BUT TER AREA IS Y
I) II 1 E4F ;E >;A -.
I II I I ?Y-_wcIR LENCrn.IO'
(snT. C77. No)
I
?A:? II
$MP. VEL DRS0
-?CIAS$ B B STONE ( (a 6)
9L srr ?
Lit I (9T. cis. tx) ?Al -\

STALL A10NG RENAINNO
LENGTH OF SANITARY SEWER
I
COLLECTOR LINE ONLY AS
/ RCCUIN[D Ulf OING AND
p
si 90.12ARON OF
.? \ STUNa_E
E UPON
IN UPO

/
S
INSTALLATION LINER MAY
PRMNi ME NEED FOR SOD.

I`
_?- -tr-

.r.

An N
p 11

t
v .... ? I
w?
v
\ A•
v
TEMP. SED. MC
(sxr. ar. I/e)
?,
YP)
J RAW,. ?-,
?-
>r' UTN- Etaiji- 11
CONS OF
T.
`V17
I I I , \d ??l
d? s}?"T445
r? i T
Nwl / TEMP. GkA
?l BERM
/LINIfS'F 44
'Pl
(T?l
?I I
41
U" a,
? ?PT19S1/
)
RLdL1(k GPAE t! ?/.?
ili PROTCCTION ,?
5x7. C16, 137) >
E^
c1JJr: EIS) I.
91? ? I ' I
IN AG E ANE/q
R
\ \[USS 8 STONE (d.-6)
\?el.„'w -
SH CIS.
\\
9
P
TFN 4D iRAP
S
14IW?
TREAT LENGTH-10,
(SHI. C17. ND)
6) ??'/ nil \\??\\\
J ??I v v \
J //.?Fl1/?K \\ \? \ \ 5,
?/\ 1\ II

z/7 1
?l 1
ni ?
SNITS X19 A
CO+ST.
/ a 1 v (TIP)
1 / \ I \
r TEVP, BEO MC 1
ILIA BT. C17, H5) rv
.
I
Ras ELCBON 01
36' PIPE ?_ I \
AT).- TO BE
vcowsTRUCTED BEFORE Rod
\DAN 15 REMOVED. 8111 X41
ArTER AREA IS STALIZEO. ` pT
1w AV A cal I vv? U
.,(?\I ?.w\ \\ sol I
\ `\
rE P KL Dss-? ?? \ \ n l ? I ? I
U9.A2 \ \
LASS B STONE (OR-60\ \ \ \\ W I I 61
SNV.'L - . 9'w
I \ \ \
SST. C16. A3B) `
I•?J a
914 Hay Sevel • Fayatml+k, NC 28705
Vov910-221-0033 4 F=910221-0035
Al dre.ings, speaScird send designs
peoNed by Crewlord Do$"CanPeA
n Iner. t of aesos mid 4Nal
rerwltl to pmperty of Crrnhre Design
Compery The Corner or " 0tw
pAea""Mims to wIXLel ddt or
"pored-" D)' a P Oper876- et
andagpmpr?e w-pesem
3-D ` \
EEV-141 Z' \ \ \ \
EY1-1aDo \\'\\ HALF SIZE
NEARIN.Gd
EARTHEN DIVIDER
I© TO INCREASE FLOW PAM \\\\1 \\I \ \
' 17,
n5l TEMP. GRAVEL
/ BERM \ \r \\\' \?\\\? I -? -- PRELIMINARY
F F .4AM / 4 (51T ) r, `l I -1--? NOT FOR SALE OR CONSTRUCTION
0 A, MR. [)I SID"i
BLOCK a GRAVEL /_ t I
A S. T. If
NET PROTECTION )rEUP, GRAVEL
aHr. Cis. 137) / yIIII?-?_1 ? / \ BCRM \ ?l
? 1 IP( I I ? ¢? / j 1 ?c T_Ca. 176J\ -? \
p \ I \ % \4 51 -?\ \
I N r 23 ' ' \ 62
62
?I
I
33 7
`
/
1 ? I \I? W
/
I i
3A 'I\ 1-
I ?
TEMP. GRAVEL I
BERM /
" _lO' ISM T. Is. 136) I I \ \

/I \?
I
t I

?
/I
I /
?
ST.
,
I I I
I
6 `
I
TEMP. DIVERSON II
r
BERM
37 SNl Cl5, i39
\

? SEWN N 1 TO I PIPE
ADWALL TO EL
DES
O \

_J- --___ -
$ I \ I
DIMEN;
SEDIMENT T TR P IS REMOVED, /
I AFTER REA IS
T&OUZEa zl
VFl. 15-7
B STONE (dc-6')
II '£ 10'L . S'w
I,I (SHT. Cie. 138) +I

I
I
it
'
I^ 4 I

;
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I I
1
I
I / 1
1 / I
I I
I
I ?. I
\ F -----
I r
I \y
4
LAKESIDE AT SNOW
HILL, LLC
321 E- Russell Street
Fayetteville. NC 28301
Phone: [phone]
nano,unu4 --._.
PROJECT MANACER: PSB
DRAWN BY. RGM
APPROVED BY. PSB
PROJECT NUMBER: 04029
??
COOS OF \ p-0 ti Sp'.0R\ \
r 3 R-1 ?l \
I An J\ 12
TEMP SOO TRAP-2 ® \ I
N, ` n
?\\,???? .OR LFNCin-I Z' ? I
(SHT. CI7. MID) ' 14
T" 9
TEMP SM TPA6_t 0
i 0
1 N fR LENGTH RIO' \e
El
/ yp? UNITS
/a TEMP . DIVERSION
HER.-Cis. A79) _ i
A
\ .a
R o a<
fI
lr r
I/ 1 :

I
r 0'
'
l

r GRAVEL can.
ENTRANCE A
1
AO
I.' i \>
BLOCK A GRAVEL I
INLET PROTECTION
-,0. 7 fST. Cis. AST)u
I
0
--------------------
r `\ V'
I ?
\ i
I `
\
i ?
Ir
I ?
? r 1
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
1 ,
I
I I I
1
I '
I
I j
I '
GRAPHIC SCALE
e
IN FEET)
1 inch- 100 R
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
1' =100'
e.re
FEBRUARY 2005
C2
s 17
MULKEY, INC. ,
'?-18 -c>5
55015

Invoice Number
Date
Voucher
--T
Amount
Discounts
Previous Pay
Net Amount
Application Fee 4/8/05 0035498 200.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
NC Division Of Water Quality
2 35 Totals
200.00
0.00
0.00 _ - --
200.00