20190648 Ver 1_PJD_Submittal_QG_20190514

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELDOFFICES
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina27587
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Harnett Central Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Harnett
0652-93-2092.000
Adams Soil Consulting
1676 Mitchell Road
Angier, NC 27501
919-414-6761
[e-mail]
Penny Road Developers
10305 Penny Rd
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-362-7336
[e-mail]
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 3
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources underCorpsauthority.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps, andthe JDwould beusedto avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as aninitialstep in a future permitting
process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
✔
05May19
Alex Adams
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
111.3
✔
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
ƒNorth Arrow
ƒGraphical Scale
ƒBoundary of Review Area
ƒDate
ƒLocation of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒJurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
ƒJurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
ƒIsolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒWetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
35.460894
-78.802822
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
x PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
x AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your requestto determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local
government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal
law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJD cannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
LANDOWNER AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT N0. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 110662 0022 & 110662 0022 36
STREET ADDRESS: Harnett Central Road, uquay Va "a, NC 27526
Please print:
Property owner: Penny Road Developers LLC
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do herehy authorize
Alex Adams , of Adams Soi! Consulting
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property:Owner's Address (if different than property above):
10305 Pennv Rd., Raleigh, IC 27606
Telephone:
919-38743871
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
1
Authorized/SiMTT
lire - Authorized Signature
Date: G� Date:

4/1/2019 Harnett County Parcel Report
http://gis.harnett.org/E911App/Parcels/ParcelReport.aspx?pin=0652-93-2092.000 1/1
Print this page

Property Description:
TR#1 PENNY ROAD DEVELOPMENT MAP#2018-258
Harnett County GIS
PID: 110662 0022
PIN: 0652-93-2092.000
REID: 0012736 Neighborhood: 01101
Subdivision:Actual Year Built:
Taxable Acreage: 111.260 AC ac TotalAcutalAreaHeated: Sq/Ft
Caclulated Acreage: 110.58 ac Sale Month and Year: 8 / 2018
Account Number: 1500028131 Sale Price: $0
Owners: PENNY ROAD DEVELOPERS LLC Deed Book & Page: 3635-0823
Deed Date: 2018/08/30
Owner Address : 10305 PENNY RD RALEIGH, NC 27606-9107 Plat Book & Page: 2018-258
Instrument Type: NW
Property Address: HARNETT CENTRAL RD FUQUAY-VARINA, NC 27526 Vacant or Improved:
City, State, Zip: FUQUAY-VARINA, NC, 27526 QualifiedCode: X
Building Count: 0 Transfer or Split: T
Township Code: 11 Within 1mi of Agriculture District: Yes
Fire Tax District: Summerville Bunnlevel
Parcel Building Value: $0 Prior Building Value: $0
Parcel Outbuilding Value : $0 Prior Outbuilding Value : $0
Parcel Land Value : $545630 Prior Land Value : $62460
Parcel Special Land Value : $0 Prior Special Land Value : $5180
Total Value : $545630
Parcel Deferred Value : $0 Prior Deferred Value : $57280
Total Assessed Value : $545630 Prior Assessed Value : $62460

4/1/2019 Appraisal Card
http://cama.harnett.org/AppraisalCard.aspx?Parcel=110662%20%20%20%200022 1/1
HARNETT COUNTY CAMA
WEBVIEWER
4/1/2019 5:00:24 PM
PENNY ROAD DEVELOPERS LLC Return/Appeal
Notes: Parcel: 11-0662- - -0022
HARNETT CENTRAL RD FUQUAY-VARINA NC 27526 PLAT:
2018/258
UNIQ ID
266042
1500028131 ID NO: 0652-93-2092.000
COUNTY WIDE ADVALOREM TAX (100), SUMMERVILLE-BUNNLEVEL (100)
CARD NO. 1 of 1
Reval Year: 2017 Tax Year:
2019 TR#1 PENNY ROAD DEVELOPMENT MAP#2018-258 111.260 AC SRC= GIS
Appraised by 14 on 09/22/2000 01101 NEILL'S CREEK TW-11 CI-FR-EX-AT-LAST ACTION
20180925
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL MARKET VALUE DEPRECIATION CORRELATION OF VALUE
TOTAL POINT VALUE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX
USE MOD
Eff.
Area QUAL
BASE
RATE RCN EYB AYB CREDENCE TO
50 00 % GOOD DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD 0
TYPE: RURAL HOME SITE
STYLE:

DEPR. OB/XF VALUE - CARD 0
MARKET LAND VALUE - CARD 545,630
TOTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 545,630
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - CARD 545,630
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - PARCEL 545,630
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE - PARCEL 0
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 0
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE - PARCEL $545,630
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE 0
OBXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 62,460
PRESENT USE VALUE 5,180
DEFERRED VALUE 57,280
TOTAL VALUE 62,460
PERMIT
CODE DATE NOTE NUMBER AMOUNT
ROUT: WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD DATE DEED
TYPE Q/U V/I
INDICATE SALES
PRICEBOOKPAGEMOYR
03635 0819 8 2018 WD Q V 1391000
03448 0652 10 2016 WD Q V 64000
03635 0823 8 2018 NW X V 0
02922 0434 11 2011 WD E V 0
02798 0561 10 2010 WD A V 140000
00928 0234 1 1991 E V 0
00928 0234 1 1991 E V 0
00910 0721 5 1990 WD X V 0
00830 0702 5 1987 WD X V 0
HEATED AREA
NOTES
P L CAMPBELL
0465
SUBAREA
TYPE
GS
AREA %
RPL
CS
FIREPLACE
SUBAREA
TOTALS
CODE QUALITY DESCRIPTION COUNT LTH WTH UNITS
UNIT
PRICE
ORIG %
COND BLDG#
SIZE
FACT AYB EYB
ANN DEP
RATE OVR
%
COND
OB/XF DEPR.
VALUE
TOTAL OB/XF VALUE 0
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
LAND INFORMATION
HIGHEST AND
BEST USE
USE
CODE
LOCAL
ZONING
FRON
TAGE DEPTH
DEPTH
/ SIZE
LND
MOD
COND
FACT
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND
NOTES RF AC LC TO OT
ROAD TYPE
LAND
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
LAND
UNITS
UNT
TYP
TOTAL
ADJST
ADJUSTED
UNIT PRICE
LAND
VALUE
OVERRIDE
VALUE
LAND
NOTES
AGRI I PV 5111 RA-30 0 0 0.9000 0 1.0000
TOPO ROLLING
6,000.00 20.000 AC 0.900 5,400.00 108000 0
FRST I PV 6111 RA-30 0 0 0.9000 0 1.0000

6,000.00 80.000 AC 0.900 5,400.00 432000 0
WASTE LAND 9600 RA-30 0 0 1.0000 0 1.0000

500.00 11.260 AC 1.000 500.00 5630 0
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA 111.260 545,630
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SEE ATTACHED
5/6/2019
Penny Rd Developers, 10305 Penny Rd, Raleigh,
NC 27606
NC Harnett Fuquay-Varina
35.460894 -78.802822
17
Neill's Creek
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______BBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____BBBBBBBBBBBB.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
or Other (Name & Date):BBBB.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Other information (please specify): ______________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
24,000 Lillington
NRCS - 1994
USFWS - 1983
NC CGIA - 2017
May 20 and June 7, 2018
Site number Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of
aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non-wetland
waters)
Geographic
authority to
which the
aquatic
resource “may
be” subject
(i.e., Section
404 or Section
10/404)
STREAMS
Neill’s Creek 35.461159 -78.805609 3082 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
SA 35.464625 -78.805366 976 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
SAB 35.458409 -78.803850 1981 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
SB 35.460743 -78.802041 3081 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
SC 35.462536 -78.802195 1112 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
SC
(Intermittent)
35.462778 -78.799846 467 Non-wetland
waters (Int
Stream)
404
SCB
(Intermittent)
35.458691 -78.798365 241 Non-wetland
waters (Int
Stream)
404
SD 35.460066 -78.800636 113 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
SD
(Intermittent)
35.460306 -78.800200 219 Non-wetland
waters (Int
Stream)
404
SE 35.459247 -78.805133 940 Non-wetland
waters (Per
Stream)
404
WETLANDS
WA 35.460993 -78.805325 12.857 Wetland 404
WB 35.461732 -78.803515 0.025 Wetland 404
WBB 35.458050 -78.800729 0.098 Wetland 404
WC 35.462700 -78.799452 0.036 Wetland 404
WCB 35.458625 -78.798334 0.148 Wetland 404
WD 35.459113 -78.798897 0.098 Wetland 404
WE 35.459315 -78.799559 0.075 Wetland 404
WF 35.459804 -78.800399 0.043 Wetland 404
WH 35.458600 -78.806737 0.249 Wetland 404
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
TOESLOPE none
35.463759 -78.805949
CeD - Cecil fine sandy loam 8-15%NA
Timber was harvested in the upland area during 2015, and vegetation has been left to naturally regenerate. Currently there is a lack of
canopy trees.
A. Adams Black River Township
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WA1-UP
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:4 (A)
2.Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:4 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
0 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0 FACW species 17 x 2 =34
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 125 x 3 =375
1.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Y FAC FACU species 15 x 4 =60
2.UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:157 (A)469 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
5 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:2.5 20% of total cover:1 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Y FAC
2.Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Ligustrum sinenese 5 FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:15 20% of total cover:6
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Eulalia viminea 80 Y FAC
2.Polygonum spp.15 FACW
3.Solidago altissima 15 FACU
4.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 FAC
5.Polystichum acrostichoides 5 FAC
6.Arundinaria gigantea 2 FACW
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
122 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:61 20% of total cover:24.4 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.0
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
WA1-UP
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-4 100 SL
4-15+100 SCL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 6/6
10YR 4/3
WA1-UP
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):10
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Timber was harvested in the adjacent upland area during 2015, and appears some trees fell into the wetland area.
FLOODPLAIN none
35.463705 -78.805730
Wh - Wehadkee loam NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WA1-WET
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.15 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:6 (A)
2.5 FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.5 FACU Species Across All Strata:6 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
25 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:12.5 20% of total cover:5 FACW species 80 x 2 =160
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 89 x 3 =267
1.Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC FACU species 5 x 4 =20
2.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:174 (A)447 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Carpinus caroliniana 15 Y FAC
2.Acer rubrum 5 FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Ligustrum sinenese 5 FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 FACW
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:15 20% of total cover:6
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Polygonum spp.40 Y FACW
2.Eulalia viminea 40 Y FAC
3.Arundinaria gigantea 15 FACW
4.Arisaema quinatum 5 FAC
5.Polystichum acrostichoides 5 FAC
6.Ligustrum sinenese 2 FAC
7.Smilax rotunidfolia 2 FAC
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
109 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:54.5 20% of total cover:21.8 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
WA1-WET
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Liquidambar styraciflua
Liriodendron tulipifera
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-5 95 5 C PL L
5-13+80 5 C PL CL
15 C M
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 4/1 7.5YR 4/6
10YR 5/6
10YR 3/2 7.5YR 4/6
WA1-WET
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
SIDESLOPE none
35.461756 -78.803500
NeE - Nason silt loam 15-25%NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WB-UP
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.25 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:3 (A)
2.15 FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:5 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:60%(A/B)
6.
7.
40 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:20 20% of total cover:8 FACW species 15 x 2 =30
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 48 x 3 =144
1.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW FACU species 85 x 4 =340
2.Acer rubrum 5 FAC UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Pinus taeda 5 FAC Column Totals:148 (A)514 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
20 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:10 20% of total cover:4 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Kalmia latifolia 60 Y FACU
2.Acer rubrum 10 FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:35 20% of total cover:14
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Arundinaria gigantea 5 Y FACW
2.Eulalia viminea 5 Y FAC
3.Lonicera japonica 2 FAC
4.Quercus falcata 2 FAC
5.Vitis sp.2 FAC
6.Smilax rotunidfolia 2 FAC
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:9 20% of total cover:3.6 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.5
WB-UP
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Liriodendron tulipifera
Acer rubrum
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-5 100 L
5-12+100 CL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
7.5YR 5/6
7.5YR 5/4
WB-UP
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):9
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FLOODPLAIN none
35.461756 -78.803500
Wh - Wehadkee loam NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WB-WET
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.15 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:10 (A)
2.15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.5 FAC Species Across All Strata:10 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
35 = Total Cover OBL species 25 x 1 =25
50% of total cover:17.5 20% of total cover:7 FACW species 60 x 2 =120
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 106 x 3 =318
1.Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC FACU species 0 x 4 =0
2.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Acer rubrum 5 FAC Column Totals:191 (A)463 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
15 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:7.5 20% of total cover:3 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW
2.Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Carpinus caroliniana 10 Y FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 FAC
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:17.5 20% of total cover:7
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Arundinaria gigantea 30 Y FACW
2.Eulalia viminea 25 Y FAC
3.Saururus cernuus 25 Y OBL
4.Polystichum acrostichoides 20 FAC
5.Arisaema quinatum 2 FAC
6.Smilax rotunidfolia 2 FAC
7.Liquidambar styraciflua 2 FAC
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
106 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:53 20% of total cover:21.2 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.4
WB-WET
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Liquidambar styraciflua
Acer rubrum
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-3 95 5 C PL L
3-14+88 2 C PL CL
10 C M
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 5/1 7.5YR 4/6
10YR 5/6
10YR 2/2 10YR 4/6
WB-WET
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
SIDESLOPE none
35.462668 -78.799529
NeE - Nason silt loam 15-25%NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WC-UP
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.30 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:7 (A)
2.10 FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:10 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:70%(A/B)
6.
7.
40 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:20 20% of total cover:8 FACW species 0 x 2 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 92 x 3 =276
1.5 Y FACU FACU species 50 x 4 =200
2.Acer rubrum 5 Y FAC UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:142 (A)476 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Ligustrum sinese 10 Y FAC
2.Liriodendron tulipifera 5 Y FACU 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Y FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.Acer rubrum 5 Y FAC
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:12.5 20% of total cover:5
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Ligustrum sinese 15 Y FAC
2.Eulalia viminea 15 Y FAC
3.Rubus sp.15 Y FAC
4.Eupatorium capillifolium 10 FACU
5.Lonicera japonica 5 FAC
6.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 FAC
7.Chrysopsis mariana 2 FAC
8.Smilax rotunidfolia 2
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
69 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:34.5 20% of total cover:13.8 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.4
Liriodendron tulipifera
WC-UP
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Liriodendron tulipifera
Acer rubrum
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-4 100 L
4-13+100 CL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
7.5YR 5/6
7.5YR 5/4
WC-UP
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):2
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):4
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FLOODPLAIN none
35.462708 -78.799518
Wh - Wehadkee loam NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WC-WET
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:3 (A)
2.Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:3 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
0 = Total Cover OBL species 40 x 1 =40
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0 FACW species 25 x 2 =50
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 52 x 3 =156
1.FACU species 0 x 4 =0
2.UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:117 (A)246 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Ligustrum sinese 10 Y FAC
2.1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Carex lurida 40 Y OBL
2.Eulalia viminea 35 Y FAC
3.Polygonum spp.15 FACW
4.Boehmeria cylindrica 10 FACW
5.Lonicera japonica 5 FAC
6.Smilax rotunidfolia 2 FAC
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
107 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:53.5 20% of total cover:21.4 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.1
WC-WET
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-6 98 2 C PL L
6-12+88 2 C PL CL
10 C M
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 4/1 10YR 4/6
10YR 5/6
10YR 2/2 10YR 4/6
WC-WET
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
SIDESLOPE none
35.459045 -78.798956
NoC - Norfolk loamy sand 6-10%NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WD-UP
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.5 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:4 (A)
2.Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:8 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:50%(A/B)
6.
7.
5 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:2.5 20% of total cover:1 FACW species 0 x 2 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 42 x 3 =126
1.10 Y FACU FACU species 35 x 4 =140
2.10 Y FAC UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.10 Y FAC Column Totals:77 (A)266 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
30 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:15 20% of total cover:6 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Kalmia latifolia 15 Y FACU
2.Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Y FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:15 20% of total cover:6
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Kalmia latifolia 5 Y FACU
2.Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Y FAC
3.Vitis sp 2 FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
12 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:6 20% of total cover:2.4 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Lirodendron tulipifera
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.5
Liquidambar styraciflua
Acer rubrum
WD-UP
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Lirodendron tulipifera
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-7 100 L
7-11+100 SCL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 5/8
10YR 4/3
WD-UP
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):12
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FLOODPLAIN none
35.459104 -78.798936
Wh - Wehadkee loam NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WD-WET
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.15 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:5 (A)
2.10 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.10 Y FAC Species Across All Strata:6 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:83%(A/B)
6.
7.
35 = Total Cover OBL species 10 x 1 =10
50% of total cover:17.5 20% of total cover:7 FACW species 15 x 2 =30
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 137 x 3 =411
1.FACU species 10 x 4 =40
2.UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:172 (A)491 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Kalmia latifolia 10 Y FACU
2.1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Eulalia viminea 80 Y FAC
2.Polystichum acrostichoides 35 Y FAC
3.Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 10 OBL
4.Smilax rotunidfolia 2 FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
127 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:63.5 20% of total cover:25.4 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.9
WD-WET
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus nigra
Acer rubrum
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-5 98 5 C PL L
5-14+88 2 C PL CL
15 C M
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 4/1 10YR 4/6
10YR 5/6
10YR 3/2 10YR 4/6
WD-WET
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
SIDESLOPE none
35.459723 -78.800357
NoC - Norfolk loamy sand 6-10%NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WF-UP
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.10 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:1 (A)
2.Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:4 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:25%(A/B)
6.
7.
10 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2 FACW species 0 x 2 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 15 x 3 =45
1.10 Y FACU FACU species 95 x 4 =380
2.UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:110 (A)425 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Kalmia latifolia 75 Y FACU
2.Acer rubrum 5 FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Nyssa sylvatica 5 FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:42.5 20% of total cover:17
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Vitis sp 5 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:2.5 20% of total cover:1 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.9
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Lirodendron tulipifera
WF-UP
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Lirodendron tulipifera
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-5 100 L
5-13+100 SCL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 6/8
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
10YR 4/3
WF-UP
Matrix Redox Features
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FLOODPLAIN none
35.4597995 -78.800357
Wh - Wehadkee loam NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 5/20/2018
Penny Rd Developers WF-WET
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.10 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:6 (A)
2.Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:6 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
10 = Total Cover OBL species 55 x 1 =55
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2 FACW species 25 x 2 =50
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 30 x 3 =90
1.5 Y FACW FACU species 2 x 4 =8
2.5 Y FAC UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:112 (A)203 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:5 20% of total cover:2 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC
2.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Kalmia latifolia 2 FACU be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
22 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:11 20% of total cover:4.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Saururus cernuus 50 Y OBL
2.Polystichum acrostichoides 15 FAC
3.Woodwardia areolata 5 OBL
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:35 20% of total cover:14 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Prevalence Index = B/A =1.8
Acer rubrum
WF-WET
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-3 98 5 C PL L
3-13+88 2 C PL C
10 C M
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 5/1 10YR 5/6
10YR 6/6
10YR 2/2 10YR 5/6
WF-WET
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
TOESLOPE none
35.460572 -78.805048
AtA - Altavista fine sandy loam 0-3%NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 6/7/2018
Penny Rd Developers WA2-UP
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:6 (A)
2.Total Number of Dominant
3.Species Across All Strata:6 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
0 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0 FACW species 0 x 2 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 100 x 3 =300
1.15 Y FAC FACU species 0 x 4 =0
2.15 Y FAC UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.Column Totals:100 (A)300 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
30 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:15 20% of total cover:6 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Acer rubrum 40 Y FAC
2.Carpinus caroliniana 15 Y FAC 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Nyssa sylvatica 10 Y FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.Ilex opaca 5 Y FAC
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:35 20% of total cover:14
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.0
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Pinus taeda
Liriodendron tulipiera
WA2-UP
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-4 100 SL
4-12+SCL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
10YR 6/6
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
10YR 5/2
WA2-UP
Matrix Redox Features
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):6
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):0
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FLOODPLAIN none
35.460382 -78.805060
Ro - Roanoke loam NA
Quail Glen Fuquay-Varina/Harnett 6/7/2018
Penny Rd Developers WA2-WET
A. Adams Black River Township
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.15 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:10 (A)
2.10 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.5 FAC Species Across All Strata:10 (B)
4.Pinus taeda 5 FAC Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100%(A/B)
6.
7.
35 = Total Cover OBL species 7 x 1 =7
50% of total cover:17.5 20% of total cover:7 FACW species 35 x 2 =70
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )FAC species 150 x 3 =450
1.15 Y FACW FACU species 0 x 4 =0
2.15 Y FAC UPL species 0 x 5 =0
3.15 Y FAC Column Totals:192 (A)527 (B)
4.
5.
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
45 = Total Cover 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:22.5 20% of total cover:9 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1.Acer rubrum 5 Y FAC
2.Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.Nyssa sylvatica 5 Y FAC
5.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:10 20% of total cover:4
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius )
1.Polystichum acrostichoides 80 Y FAC
2.Woodwardia areolata 5 OBL
3.Polystichum acrostichoides 5 FAC
4.Carex lurida 2 OBL
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
92 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:46 20% of total cover:18.4 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft radius Vegetation Yes No
1.Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:0 20% of total cover:0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Acer rubrum
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.7
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Pinus taeda
WA2-WET
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Nyssa sylvatica
Acer rubrum
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-6 98 2 C PL L
6-13+88 2 C PL CL
10 C M
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)(MLRA 136, 147)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
7.5YR 6/6
10YR 5/2 7.5YR 5/6
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
10YR 4/2 7.5YR 5/6
WA2-WET
Matrix Redox Features
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6A
5/20/2018 Quail Glen 35.464625
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.805366
35.00 ✔Lillington
16.0
10.0
9.00
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6AB
6/7/2018 Quail Glen 35.458409
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.803850
33.50 ✔Lillington
17.0
8.5
8.00
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6B
5/20/2018 Quail Glen 35.460743
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.802041
39.50 ✔Lillington
20.5
10.0
9.00
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6CB
6/7/2018 Quail Glen 35.458691
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.798365
24.00 ✔Lillington
8.5
8.0
7.50
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6C-Int
5/20/2018 Quail Glen 35.462778
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.799846
24.00 ✔Lillington
9.0
7.5
7.50
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6C-Per
5/20/2018 Quail Glen 35.462536
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.802195
33.50 ✔Lillington
16.0
10.0
7.50
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6D-Int
5/20/2018 Quail Glen 35.460306
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.800200
22.00 ✔Lillington
7.5
8.0
6.50
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6D-Per
5/20/2018 Quail Glen 35.460066
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.800636
30.50 ✔Lillington
14.0
9.0
7.50
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
)($785(6E
6/7/2018 Quail Glen 35.459247
A. Baldwin & A. Adams Harnett -78.805133
24.50 ✔Lillington
9.5
7.0
8.00
0 1 20.5
Miles FIGURE 1
Title:
Client:
Drawn By:Date:
Project:
VICINITY
MAP
Legend
Project Study Area (~111 ac)
§¨¦40
£¤401
Ref. ESRI Open Street Map
³
Wake
AB
Harnett County, NC
1/2019
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Quail GlenResidential Development
Harnett County, NC
Penny Rd Developers
ADAMS SOILCONSULTING
Johnston
Harnett
§¨¦95
Cape

F
e
a
r

R
i
v
e
r
(c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CC-BY-SA),Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society
0 2,000 4,0001,000
Feet FIGURE 2
Title:
Client:
Drawn By:Date:
Project:
USGS TOPOGRAPHY
MAP
Legend
Project Study Area (~111 ac)
Ref. USGS 7.5 MinuteTopography MapLillington, NC Quadrangle
³
AB
Harnett County, NC
1/2019
Penny Rd Developers
LillingtonQuad
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Quail GlenResidential Development
Harnett County, NC
ADAMS SOILCONSULTING
Ballard RdH
a
r
n
e
t
t
C
e
n
t
r
a
l

R
d
PFO1/4B
PFO1A
PSS1C
R4SBC
PUBHh
R4SBC
PUBHx
R4SBC
R5UBH
R5UBH
R5UBH
PUBHh
R4SBC R4SBC
PFO1/4B
R5UBH
Ut
NeillsCreek(NealsCreek)Dr
yCreek
U
t
Ut
Ut0 750 1,500375
Feet FIGURE 3
Title:
Client:
Drawn By:Date:
Project:
Legend
NHD 24K (Cape Fear Basin)
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Project Study Area (~111 ac)
Ref. USFWS CONUS Wetland DataHarnett County, NC (1983)
³
AB
Harnett County, NC
1/2019
Penny Rd Developers
NATIONAL WETLAND
INVENTORY MAP
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Quail GlenResidential Development
Harnett County, NC
ADAMS SOILCONSULTING
NWIpolygons within the PSA.
Harnett Central Rd
PFO1/4B - Palustrine Forested,Broad-leaf Deciduous, Needle-leaf Evergreen, SeasonallySaturated
R4SBC - Riverine, Intermittent,Streambed, SeasonallyFlooded
R5UBH - Riverine, UnknownPerennial, UnconsolidatedBottom, Permanently Flooded
Ut
NeillsCreek(NealsCreek)UtUtUt
Ut
Wh
NeE
DoB
NeE
DoB
CeD
Au
NoC
AtA
LnB
HaB
VeB
DtB
DoA
DtB
Ro
AtA
Ro
FaB
LnB
NoC
LnB NeE OrB
NoB
NoARa
Ro
DoACeD
AtA
LoF
AtA
Pd
Pd
WaCNeE
To
DoB
NeE
Ra
To
NeE
StA
NoB
CeB
0 750 1,500375
Feet FIGURE 4
Title:
Client:
Drawn By:Date:
Project:
Legend
NHD 24K (Cape Fear Basin)
NRCS Soil Map Units
Project Study Area (~111 ac)
Ref. USDA - NRCS Soil SurveyHarnett County, NC (1994)
³
AB
Harnett County, NC
1/2019
Penny Rd Developers
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Quail GlenResidential Development
Harnett County, NC
ADAMS SOILCONSULTING
Soil map unitswithin the PSA.
Harnett Central Rd
AtA: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0-
CeD: Cecil fine sandy loam, 8-15%
DoB: Dothan loamy sand, 2-6%
DtB: Dothan gravelly loamy sand, 0-6%
HaB: Helena fine sandy loam, 2-8%
LnB: Lillington very gravelly sandy loam,2-8%
NeE: Nason silt loam, 15-25%
NoB: Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6%
NoC: Norfolk loamy sand, 6-10%
Pd: Pits Dumps Complex
Ro: Roanoke loam [HYDRIC]
Wh: Wehadkee loam [HYDRIC]
SBSC
SABSASENeils CrkSDSCBNCCGIA FIGURE 5
Title:
Client:
Date:
Project:
APPROXIMATE WATERS
OF THE U.S. AND
WETLANDS LOCATIONMAP
Ref. National Agriculture ImageryProgram (NAIP) Aerial Photography(2016)
Wetland A; 12.857 acresLat: 35.460993 NLong: 78.805325 W
Har
n
e
t
t

C
e
n
t
r
a
l

R
d
Legend
Project Study Area (~111 ac)
Potential Wetland WOUS
Streams
Potential Non-Wetland WOUS (Intermittent Stream)
Potential Non-Wetland WOUS (Perennial Stream)
Data Points
Upland Data Point
Wetland Data Point
WA-1 Paired Data Points
NC/SA Confluence ³
Drawn By:AB 4/2019
Penny Rd Developers
Harnett County, NC
Notes:Jurisdictional boundaries of the waters of the U.S. havenot been verified by the U.S. Army corps of Engineersand are subject to change following verification.
0 200 400100
Feet
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Quail GlenResidential Development
Harnett County, NC
ADAMS SOILCONSULTING
Wetland B; 0.025 acresLat: 35.461732 NLong: 78.803515 W
Wetland C; 0.036 acresLat: 35.462700 NLong: 78.799452 W
Wetland A; 12.857 acresLat: 35.460993 NLong: 78.805325 W Wetland F; 0.043 acresLat: 35.459804 NLong: 78.800399 W
Wetland H; 0.XXX acresLat: 35.46XXXX NLong: 78.79XXXX W
Wetland H; 0.249 acresLat: 35.458600 NLong: 78.806737 W
Wetland E; 0.075 acresLat: 35.459315 NLong: 78.799559 W
Wetland D; 0.098 acresLat: 35.459113 NLong: 78.798897 W
Wetland CB; 0.148 acresLat: 35.458625 NLong: 78.798334 W
Wetland BB; 0.098 acresLat: 35.458050 NLong: 78.800729 W
WA-2 Paired Data Points
Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society
SB SCSBSANeils Crk
WB
WCWC
WA
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis623358 623358Legend
Upland Data Point
Wetland Data Point
Potential Non-Wetland WOUS (Intermittent Stream)
Potential Non-Wetland WOUS (Perennial Stream)
Potential Wetland WOUS
Project Study Area (~111 ac);
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Jurisdictional boundaries of the waters of the U.S. havenot been verified by the U.S. Army corps of Engineersand are subject to change following verification.
National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Aerial Photography (2016).
Notes1.
2.
3.
0 150 300Feet1:1,080 (At original document size of 22x34)
($$¯
Project Location
Harnett Central RdBlack Creek Township, Harnett Co., NC
TitleAPPROXIMATE WATERS OF THE U.S. AND WETLANDS LOCATION MAP
Client/ProjectPenny Road DevelopersPreliminary Jurisdictional Determination RequestQuail Glen
Figure No.5A
±
HA
R
N
E
T
T

C
E
N
T
R
A
L

R
D
Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic SocietySD SCBSB
SENeils CrkSAB
S
B
WD
WE
WF
WBB
WCB
WA
WA
WH
WH
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Legend
Upland Data Point
Wetland Data Point
Potential Non-Wetland WOUS (Intermittent Stream)
Potential Non-Wetland WOUS (Perennial Stream)
Potential Wetland WOUS
Project Study Area (~111 ac);
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Jurisdictional boundaries of the waters of the U.S. havenot been verified by the U.S. Army corps of Engineersand are subject to change following verification.
National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Aerial Photography (2016).
Notes1.
2.
3.
0 150 300Feet1:1,080 (At original document size of 22x34)
($$¯
Project Location
Harnett Central RdBlack Creek Township, Harnett Co., NC
TitleAPPROXIMATE WATERS OF THE U.S. AND WETLANDS LOCATION MAP
Client/ProjectPenny Road DevelopersPreliminary Jurisdictional Determination RequestQuail Glen
Figure No.5B
±
PHOTO LOG
Photo 1: Wetland A Upland Data Point – May 20, 2018
Photo 2: Wetland A Wetland Data Point – May 20, 2018

Photo 3: Wetland B Upland Representative Photo – May 20, 2018

Photo 4: Wetland B Wetland Representative Photo – May 20, 2018
Photo 5: Wetland C Upland Data Point – May 20, 2018
Photo 6: Wetland C Wetland Data Point – May 20, 2018
Photo 7: Wetland D Representative Photo – May 20, 2018

Photo 8: Wetland D Upland Data Point – May 20, 2018

Photo 9: Wetland F Wetland Data Point – May 20, 2018

Photo 10: Wetland F Upland Representative Photo – May 20, 2018

Photo 11: Wetland A2 Wetland Representative Photo – May 20, 2018
Photo 12: Wetland A2 Upland Representative Photo – May 20, 2018
Photo 13: Stream A Perennial Data Point facing downstream – May 20, 2018

Photo 14: Neill’s Creek Perennial Data Point facing downstream – May 20, 2018

Photo 15: Stream B Perennial Data Point facing upstream – May 20, 2018

Photo 16: Stream C Intermittent Data Point facing downstream – May 20, 2018

Photo 17: Stream C Perennial Data Point facing downstream – May 20, 2018
Photo 18: Stream D Intermittent Data Point facing downstream – May 20, 2018
Photo 19: Stream D Perennial Data Point facing upstream – May 20, 2018

Photo 20: Intermittent Stream E facing downstream flowing into Wetland E – June 7, 2018

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID # NCDWR#
Project Name Wits End Site - Wetland A Impact
W-1 Date of Evaluation 5/20/2018
Applicant/Owner Name Penny Rd Developers Wetland Site Name Wetland A Impact
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Adams Soil Consulting
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Neill's Creek
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03003004
County Harnett NCDWR Region Fayetteville
Yes No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.463846/-78.806022
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? Yes No

Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Anadromous fish
Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
Publicly owned property
N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference community
Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? Yes No
Is the assessment area’s surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition – assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
A A Not severely altered
B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compact ion, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration – assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch ≤ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change )
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief – assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
B B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4.Soil Texture/Structure – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a.A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b.A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon ≥ 1 inch
4c.A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5.Discharge into Wetland – opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank , underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area a nd
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6.Land Use – opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
A A A >10% impervious surfaces
B B B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
C C C ≥ 20% coverage of pasture
D D D ≥ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
E E E ≥ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F F F ≥ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
G G G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7.Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer – assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
Yes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbe d.)
A ≥ 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
≤ 15-feet wide > 15-feet wide Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered – adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed – adjacent open water with width ≥ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8.Wetland Width at the Assessment Area – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (W T) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
A A ≥ 100 feet
B B From 80 to < 100 feet
C C From 50 to < 80 feet
D D From 40 to < 50 feet
E E From 30 to < 40 feet
F F From 15 to < 30 feet
G G From 5 to < 15 feet
H H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration – assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition – assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable , see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear -cut, select “K” for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
A A A ≥ 500 acres
B B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E E From 10 to < 25 acres
F F F From 5 to < 10 acres
G G G From 1 to < 5 acres
H H H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
I I I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
J J J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
K K K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness – wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (≥ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas – landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contigu ous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.

Well Loosely
A A ≥ 500 acres
B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D From 10 to < 50 acres
E E < 10 acres
F F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats

13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or ti dal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificia l edges include
non-forested areas ≥ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessme nt area is clear cut,
select option ”C.”
A 0
B 1 to 4
C 5 to 8
15. Vegetative Composition – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata compo sed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions , but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure – assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.

17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
A ≥ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation

17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
A A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
B B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
C C Canopy sparse or absent

A A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
B B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
C C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent

A A Dense shrub layer
B B Moderate density shrub layer
C C Shrub layer sparse or absent

A A Dense herb layer
B B Moderate density herb layer
C C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion – wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. P atterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
A B C D

22. Hydrologic Connectivity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.

Notes
The assessment area was along the edge of a recently timbered parcel of land and a dirt access road is located adjacent to the assessment area.
Also, a regulalrly maintained sewer easement comes in and out of the wetland complex.

Canopy Mid-Story Shrub Herb
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland A Impact Date of Assessment 5/20/2018
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Adams Soil Consulting
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)NO
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)NO
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition HIGH
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM