20050525 Ver 1_Complete File_20050328

o~ WAi~1y
O~ I: Oc.
(is 'Y
- I
> -
_ -1
o "

Michael F. Easley, Governor

William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

,I

Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality

May 10, 2005

DWQ Project # 05-0525
Wake County

Agnes C. Summerlin
1800 Sti11~ater Drive
I
Raleigh, NC 27607
!

Subject Prdperty: Dairyland Subdivision, lot 34 ,
I: UT to House Creek [03-04-02, 27-33-13, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]

Approval o( 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Buff~r Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
I

Dear Ms. SUmmerlin: \
You have 01 approval, in accordance with the attached c~hditions and those listed below, to
I .
place fill wi~~in or otherwise impact 0.025 acres ofwetIands, 140 feet of streams and 4,000
square feet (n2) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing a house and
driveway at lhe subject property, as described within your application dated March 28, 2005 and
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on March 28,2005. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality
CertificationlNumber 3402 (GC3402). The Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
18 when issJed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your
approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC
2B .0233. In\ addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed
with your p~oposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application
shall expire tip on expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
!
I
This approval! is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, tou must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby res~onsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exdeed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may .
be required as;described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.

The Additionll Conditions of the Certification are:

N.?~Carolina
/Vn/ufnll!!

401 OversighVExpress Review Un" I
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX 919-733;6893/lntemet: htto:l/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands

Agnes C. Summerlin
Page 2 of 4
5/10/05

1. Impact, Approved

Ib~ILIOWing impacts are her:bY approved as long as all of the other specific and
gen~ral conditions ofthis Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
imPfcts are approved including incidental impacts: ,

I

Amounti\pproved
(Units
140 (feet)
0.025 acres)
4,000 (square ft.)

Plan Location or Reference

Stream
404 Wetlands
Buffers (tem orary)
I
2. Erosionif Sediment Control Practices

Erosion and sediment control practices must be it:?- full compliance with all specifications
govJrning the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Man:agement Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
! \
\
\
a. Jhe erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
l:rorth Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. 11le design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
~ontrol measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
~aste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
~ssociated with the project.
:
i
I
3. No \y'aste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind

No +aste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands; waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of -
I
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
I
, ViOljtions qf state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. '

4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures win Wetlands or Waters

sedlent and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maxihIum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlrkds and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
. !
proJect.

I
!
!

.'

Agnes C. Summerlin
Page 3 of 4
5/10/05

5. Diffuse Flow (No Review)
I

All Jonstructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as
dimse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it
will pot re-concentrate before discharging into a stream as identified within 15A NCAC
2B .0,233 (5). If this is not possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwatei facilities
that pre considered to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this
Office.
I
6. Protbctive Fencing

The lutside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the con~truction corridor within
thes~ :boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
w~g fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to
ensute compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and GC 3402.
I
I"
!

\

7. Deed Notifications \
I '.,
Deed ,notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wet1~ds, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland,
water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval
and ~uthorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the
401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the
sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project.
1 ' "
8. Certificate of Completion :

upoAcomPletion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
appli~able Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
returh the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
I -
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criniinal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with yopr proposed
impacts or td ,conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certificationl.shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
I
!

If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
I
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
I
conforms to ~hapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 67:14 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions ,~ final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.

"

J
1
;1
!
'1
J
'i
.-i
;
"
:1

Agnes C. Summerlin
Page 4 of 4
5/10/05

Any dispute~,over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificat~ (associated with the
approved buffer impacts) shall be ref~rred in writing to the Director for a:, decision. The
Director' s dJ~ision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of! G:S. 150B.

This letter ~~Pletes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 40 I of the Clean
Water Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. Ifyod have any questions, please telephone John Dorney or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-
1786. I

A WK/dae

Enclosures: ' GC 3402
Certificate of Completion

Sincerely,

~~

Rr / Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

cc: Bob ZfU'zecki-S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raieigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
Pile Cqpy

ceol 'Files Filename: 050525Dairyland(Walee)40 l+buffer

I
i
I

"

S&
EC

I!

PAYMENT

RECEIVED

Soil & Environmental Co'nsultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road . Ra]eigh, North Carolina 27614 · Phone: (~19) 846-5900 · Fax: [phone]
www.SandEc.com ' !
I March 28, 2005
S&EC Project # 05-9356.w1

i,1
'@IR1D~D1Nf~O::

050525

"

I!

U~ Army Corps of Engineers
Raieigh Regulatory Field Office
Att~: Andrea Wade
6508 Falls ofthe Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

From: BO~ Zarzecki, Environmental Specialist
SOI(& Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11 QlO Raven Ridge Road '
Raleigh, NC 27614
I
Lo~ 34, Dairy Land Subdivision,
Stillwater Drive.& Hatteras Court, Raleigh, NC
L
_ On behalf qf the owner, Agnes C. Summertin, please find attached acomplet~ application and
supplemen'~1 information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) ard the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may
precede un~er Nationwide Permit 18 and General Water Quality Certification 3402. Although it is
not required' under GC3402, we are providing a formal application and fee to DWQ in an effort to
obtain written approval to use GC3402. Please contact me at (919) 846-590() if you have any
questions or. require additional information.

I PROJECT SUMMARY

FILE COpy

To:

N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260

m~@~OW~ ~

MAt< 2 8 Z005

Re:

DENR - WATER QUALITY
~DSANDSTORMW^TERBRANCH

I Proiect Name Lot 34, Dairy Land Subdivision
I' Proiect Type Residential
I Owner I Applicant Agnes C. Summertin
I: County Wake:
I Nearest Town Raleigh
I; Waterbody Name UT to House Creek
I Basin I Sub-basin 03-04-02
I Index Number 27-33-13
, I Class C,NSW

I;

IMPACT SUMMARY

I;
Attachments:
I
Pr~nstruction NotifICation (PCN) Application Form
Ageq( Authorization
Wake County GIS Site VICinity Map
Raleigh West, NC - USGS Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map - Sheet No. 48
ImpaCt Map ,
Stream & Wetland Photos, USACE Stream Forms. CWO Stream Forms & Wetland Data Forms
Prop~rty Deed (Book 1756. Page 259)
$200, Application Fee to DWO '

Charlotte .O~ce: . I [
236 LePhlllIp Court, SUIte C '
Concord, Nc 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

9tream Impact (acres): f 0.02
""'etland Impact (acres): : 0.025
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.045
T,otal Stream Impact Oinear feet): 140

Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawnda]e Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

~

~

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28, 2005 - Page 1 of26

Office Use onlYr!

USACE ActionID No. DWQ No.
(Ifany particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or ''N/A''.)

P . \
rocessmg

1. Chec~:all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[8J Section 404 Permit [8J Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
o Sciction 10 Permit 0 Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
[8J 40 1 Water Quality Certification

2. Natiolwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 18

3. If this 11'otificatiOn is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 40 I Certification
is not reqUired, check here: 0

4. Ifpayment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal ofPCN), complete
sectio~ VIII and check here: 0
i
I
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Envirdnmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: 0
I
Applicant Information

1. owne1/ Applicant Information
Name~ Agnes C. Summerlin (owner)
Mailirig Address: 1800 Stillwater Drive
I Raleigh, NC 27607

Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
I
I
I
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:1 . . Bo~ Zarze~ki
Company AffilIatIOn: SoIl & EnVIronmental Consultants, P A
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
I Raleigh, NC 27614
I
I
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail: Address:bzarzeckiauSandEC.com

I
I
I
I
[

Form Version March 05

'050525

I.

II.

Page 1 of26

~

III.

: i

i
r
I
I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
, March 28,2005 - Page 2 of26

Project Information

Attach J' vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaribs outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long .is the property is clearly defmed. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, I DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings, rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced tb a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the projeJt has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.

1. NamJ ofproject: Lot 34, Dairy Land Subdivision
I
2. T.I.P.IProject Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
r
I
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0795310414 (Lot 34)
I
4. Locatton
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Lot 34, Dairy Land Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
From'the intersection of Lake Boone Road & 1-440, Raleigh, NC; take Lake Boone
Road i east toward downtown Raleigh; turn right on Stillwater Drive; turn left on
Hatteras Court; the property is located on the southeast intersection of Stillwater Drive
and Hatteras Court. (see attached Wake County GIS Site Vicinity Map)

5. Site Joordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
r
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimwn): 35.8143 ON 78.6869 oW

6. propek size (acres): 0.55 acres

7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to House Creek; The deed refers to the
stream as "Stillwater Branch", but it is not named on the USGS map.
I
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin [03-04-02,27-33-13, C NSW]
(Note ~ this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
I
9. Descriqe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the rme of this application: The property is a vaeant, wooded, residential lot that w...

I Page 2 of26
I

:!

IV.

v.

! I

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
f March 28, 2005 - Page 3 of26

deeded to Mr. & Mrs. Summerlin on August 11, 1966 (see attached deed). The
surr01'mding properties consist of Martin Jr. High School, municipal property and
private residential lots.
I
10. DescriQe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proje~t will consist of site improvements including grading and fill within the envelope
of the 'proposed house, driveway and yard. Standard heavy equipment (e.g., track hoes,
bull dpzers, etc.) will be used to perform the work. A pipe will be installed to bypass a
small, I first order stream through the site. The stream originates just east of the
propertY at a stormwater outfall from a parking lot and existing development.

11. EXPIl the purpose of the proposed work: The basic project purpose is to perform
necess~ry site improvements (e.g., grading, fill and lot clearing) to provide a suitable
buildihg site to construct a house, driveway and yard that is consistent both with the
other homes in the neighborhood and the current market value of the property.
I
Prior Project History
I
I
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (i~cluding all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ill Nwnber, DWQ Project Nwnber, application date, and date permits and
certificatidns were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer im~acts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
I
I
The lot w~s recorded in the late 1960's and the subdivision was developed during the late
1960's a~d 1970's. S&EC is not aware of any previously issued 404 permits or 401
certifications for the property or neighborhood. S&EC delineated the streams and
wetlands ~n the property. The surveyed delineation was used to develop the attached
I
"Impact lYIap". This delineation has not been field verified by either the USACE or DWQ.
Wetland Data Forms, stream forms and photographs are attached.
I

Future Pr~ject Plans

Are any ~ture permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.

The propirty is a 0.55-acre, single-family residential lot. No additional impacts beyond
those requested within this application are anticipated. Any future owners will be notified
I
of the retained streams, wetlands and buffers on the property. The City of Raleigh
typically teviews construction permits for compliance with wetland and buffer regulations
and as su~h we do not anticipate any future, cumulative impacts to the retained streams,
I
wetlands ()r buffers.
I
I
!

Page 3 of26

I

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 4 of26

VI. Proposed. Impacts to Waters of the United StateslWaters of the State

. It is the ~PPlicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands'l,open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed se~arately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap di$sipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompari.ying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should b9. shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland ,and stream evaluation and delineation forms should b~ included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland dr stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is nbeded for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
I
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts include: the
piping of 140 feet of a 1st order, perennial stream; and the discharge of fill into 0.025
acres 'of a headwater forest wetland. The origin of the stream begins just east of the
prop~rty at a stormwater outfall that captures runoff from an existing parking lot and
developed land. The stream will be diverted into a swale that will convey it to a pipe
that Will bypass the stream around the house site. The pipe will day-light into an
exismlg wetland in a location where the stream currently dissipates and does not have a
well defined channel. (See Impact Justification for further discussion.) Wetland data
I
forms, stream forms and photographs are attached.
I
I
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mech~zed clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
I

Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
lOO-year Nearest Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Lot 34 Fill Headwater Forest Wetland No 0 0.025
I Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.025

3. List Je total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: - 0.1 acres -
Wetlahds were not completely delineated within Zone 1 of the protected buffer. No
impacts are anticipated to occur within this protected area. All wetlands outside of
Zone 1 and within the proposed impact areas were delineated.
I
I
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
cons~ction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must ~e included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
I

I
i
! Page 4 of26

r
I
I
,
,
I
Soil & Environmental Consul~ts, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28, 2005 - Page 5 of26
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before :rIDpact (linear feet) (acres)
Lot 34 I UT to House Pipe & Fill Perennial 5 ft. 140 0.02
Creek
I Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 140 0.02

; I

5. Indivi~uallY list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, ,estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Oce~ and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Ii

Open Water Impact Name of Water body Type of Water body Area of
Site Number I Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) I (if applicable) ocean, etc.) (acres)
I
I
I ,
I
I Total Open Water Impact (acres)

!
6. List th~ cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin
Stream Impact (acres):
IWetland Impact (acres):
o en Water 1m act (acres):
rrotal Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
[otal Stream 1m act (linear feet):
I
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? D Yes IZI No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the si2k of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
apPlie, to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.

I
I
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be desdribed here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond t~be created in (check all that apply): D uplands D,stream D wetlands
Descri~e the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Propos~d use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size ofiwatershed draining to pond:
I
I
I
I

I

Expected pond surface area:

Page 5 of 26

VII.

I

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28, 2005 - Page 6 of26

Impact Jristification (Avoidance and Minimization)
I
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
informatibn related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial yiability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layoll;ts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
technique's to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.

The lot jas recorded in the late 1960's. This is both prior to the "Clean Water Act" and
the Neus~ Buffer Rule. However, our owner intends to comply with both of these
I . I
regu atlOns.
I
Du~ to si~e constraints, impa~ts to streams ~nd wetlands will be required to fulfill the basic
project purpose of constructing a house, driveway and yard on the property. The streams,
wetlandsiand buffers were delineated on the property in an effort to develop a site design
that will tninimize impacts to these resources as much as practicable.
I

We belie~e that the perennial origin of this 1st order stream is located somewhere within
the impact reach and that the reach upstream (east) of the site is not perennial. As such we
do not a~ticipate that the proposed design will have a negative impact on aquatic life
passage through the site. Also by day-lighting the pipe and the bYipassed stream into the
wetland Jrea in a location where the current stream channel dissipates and no well-defined
channel ~:i:ists, we believe that the functions and stability of the retained wetland and
stream will be maintained.
I

As discus~ed in the riparian buffer section of this application. the stream proposed to be
impacted, by the proiect is "exempt" from the Neuse Buffer Rule because it is not
approximately shown on most recent version of either the USGS topoeraphic map or Wake
County Soil Survey. However, the stream along the southern property boundary is
depicted on the Wake County Soil survey and therefore the Neuse Buffer Rule applies to
this streatn. No impacts will occur to the stream or wetlands within Zone 1 of the protected
buffer. I

I
The only ~mpacts proposed to the protected buffer are associated with "Grading and
revegetation" in Zone 2. The disturbed areas will be vegetated and stabilized, diffuse flow
will be m~intained and the existing vegetation within Zone 1 will not be compromised. As
such, this I activity is "exempt" from the Neuse Buffer Rule. This w~ result in a 50-foot
protected!buffer consisting of two Zones. Zone 1 (30 feet closest tOjthe stream) will be
undisturbed. Zone 2 (the outer 20 feet) will be left vegetated and only uses classified as
I
"exemPt"l will occur within this area.

I
I
I

Page 6 of 26

i
I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 7 of26

VIII. Mitigation
I
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division bf Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freShwater I : wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of ,total impacts to perennial
streams. :

USACE T'In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15,2002, mitigation will be required when
necessaryj to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including I size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic re~ource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation! as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropri~te and practicable include,
but are n~t limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic rebource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.

If mitigatiln is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applickt may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Tbchnical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.~nr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
I
1. Provid~ a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or lmap, if off site), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
presentation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation i easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separ~te sheet if more space is needed.
I
The mitigation proposed for this project includes: the avoidance of impacts to the
perennial stream along the southern property boundary; the avoidance of impacts to all
wetlands within 30 feet of the stream along the southern property boundary; the
avoida~ce of all impacts to Zone 1 of the protected buffer; and the avoidance of the
install~tion of any impervious surfaces within Zone 2 of the protected buffer (the only
impacts that will occur to Zone 2 are activities classified as "exempt" in the Neuse
Buffer Rule). We do not believe that additional mitigation should be required given
that thF total impacts to streams is 140 feet (less than 150 feet); the total impacts to
wetlands is 0.025 acres (less than 1/10 acres); and that the property is a single-family
reside~tiallot recorded in the 1960's. If additional mitigation is required, our client
propos~s payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the Ecosystem
Enhantement Program (EEP). Confirmation from the EEP has not been received given
that w11dO not believe that mitigation should be required as stat~d above.

I
I
I P.7~~
I

: I

I
'I
i

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28, 2005 - Page 8of26

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Progrtlln (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
(919)1715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additi~mal information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. Ifuse of the NCEEP is proposed, please
CheCkithe appropriate box on page five and provide the following ipformation:

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
.Aci.ount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
AIriount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
AIhount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Arllount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):

IX. Enviromnental Documentation (required by DWQ)

1. Does ~e project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public' (federal/state) land? Yes 0 No 181
I

2. If yesJ does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEP AlSEP A)?
Note: i If you are not sure whether a NEPAlSEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes OJ No 0

3. If yes,! has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes 0 No 0
I
I
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)

It is the a~Plicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justificatioh for these impacts in Section VII above. . All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's Idiscretion.

1. Will Je project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse); 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identitY . )? Yes 181 No 0
I

Page 8 of26

!

XI.

Soil & Environmental Consult~ts, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28, 2005 - Page 9of26

I

2. If "yJs'" identiJY the sqnare feet and acreage of impact to each ione of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffi !. If r

er mu lpJ lers.
I Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
I I 0 3 (2 for Catawba)
I 2 4,000** 1.5 "Exempt"**
I Total 4,000** "Exempt"**

* I. Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
** I. Proposed impacts include "exempt" grading and revegetation within Zone 2 only.

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within: 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.

No bJffer mitigation is required for the proposed activity. The stream proposed to be
impa~ted by the project is "exempt" from the Neuse Buffer Rule, because it is not
appro~imately shown on most recent version of either the USGS topographic map or
Wake:County Soil Survey. However, the stream along the southern property boundary
is depicted on the Wake County Soil survey and therefore the Neuse Buffer Rule applies
to this stream. No impacts will occur to the stream, buffers or wetlands within Zone 1
of th~. protected buffer. The only impacts proposed to the protected buffer are
associ~ted with "Grading and revegetation" in Zone 2. The disturbed areas will be
veget~ted and stabilized, diffuse flow will be maintained and the existing vegetation
withm:Zone 1 will not be compromised. As such, this activity is "exempt" from the
NeuseBuffer Rule.

Stormwatlr (required by DWQ)
I

Describe i~pervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acrrage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the propefty. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
I
I
The total property is 0.55 acres or 23,958 sf. There are currently no existing impervious
surfaces on the property. The proposed house, garage and driveway depicted on the site
plan total ~pproximately 3,600 sf or approximately 15% of the total property. No
stormwat~r runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces will be piped through the buffer.
"Yard dr6p inlets" will be not used to discharge stormwater to the bypass pipe. All runoff
from the p'roposed impervious surfaces will be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive
velocities prior to entering the protected buffer along the southern property boundary. As
such, the project will comply with the "diffuse flow" requirements of the Neuse Buffer
Rule. A properly sized rip-rap dissipater will be installed at the outlet of the pipe (outside
of the protected buffer) to achieve non-erosive velocities prior to entering the wetland.

I

r

Page 9 of26

~

XII.

XIII.

XIV.

xv.

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 10 of26

Sewage itsposal (required by DWQ)

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non~discharge or discharge) of
wastewath generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
I
The existi~g City of Raleigh sanitary sewer system will be used to dispose of all sewage
from the proposed house. The City is responsible for verifying that connection to the
system ww not exceed the available capacity oftheir treatment facility.

ViolationS (required by DWQ)

Is this sit~ in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Ru1es?
Yes D No [8J

Is this an r-the-facl permit application? Yes 0 No 181

Cumulatlve Impacts (required by DWQ)

Will this 1roject (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
developm~nt, which cou1d impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes D No [8J
If yes, ple~e submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most tecent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.bnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This
project cqnsists of the development of a single-family residential lot recorded in the 1960's.
No additional development is anticipated to occur as a result of this project.
I
Other Circumstances (Optional):

It is the a~Plicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to fist constraints associated with construction or sequencing .that may impose limits on
work schedu1es (e.g., draw-down schedu1es for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened.Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
I
I

t

March 28 2005
I t/flt. ent's Signature Date
t's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
I

Page 10 of26

~

~

Soil & Environmental Consultimts, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 11 of26

Agent Authorization Form

I:
Flb-Z5-21105 101.1.. FrarCOlilSTOCK I<<lIIS

I:

I

11I7888535

NOI P.OD1/001 1'-145

S&
EC

Soil & Bnvitonnaental Con8ultant8~ PA
lt010-.-JtIdtII-- -1taIIll&'Io..c:.6t.:lW4 . ao-(9IS)~. 1'IalClllt)~
...rl.~- '

. AGBNT AUTHOlDZATJON 1lORM
I ,~BlaDk! 10 Befilt" In DvThe~ Land~
~ame: A6~ Cr~~~
I ,.,',
,'~ 1Pr 3~- 1).r..~~~ ~~~Lcl <!)J~S'3\O~lf
~ .:: . "fIR?". ~t; I.
~NGM/DesaJpticm: ~~. ~~.- -. '-:
'Data: :z.-ZA--~

,l'he ~oItMA:tm1
U.5..A:#tty<:oql of~ ~ Dist1il:t
f.O.,~ 1890
_ W~ NC 2M02
I, .
~:-:Jj..- ","\,,~
lidd Oifil:e: IZ- '"'f ""!""I"
I '.
:Re: Wetlands ~ ~ anc1Per.mitting
i
1"0 Whom It May Co.ucem:
I
~ tile cu.treJ\$prqperW ~ Mrebt..,.,.- "~SoiI. ~ Cansultants, PA to
act in my bIbalf8l,my ep.otbl, fM ~.. ofpetA\it~.... toNmfsh "GPClEU_
'~~, . in$UppOd'ol~" tldsdayfonvar4. The' day of
F~~ . .
I: .'
r1lOtili2tian~~~ previouS~~tbe.pt~,tbispraject.
NO'JlCE: TIdI aath~n'd, iw Hahl1ity aDd {4ut.nCP:DJJ ~feUOIUl.ill"ali4011lyfor
p__aaotoUidalt to.-8M ~wMo ~,....... ~"'BC""'YoGdloQlcaDsec
to aD'llSIp a aiIe.....- pIiut III wfsitiIt&tbe" . ,
I . .
P-.t:,~ C. ~~
~ Property OWM:'s N8;DJe
I
ce Mr. Jahn lJomey
I! NCDBNR"DWQ
, 2321 en.~ I30Wevazd
I ~ NC 27604

-

~
~~pc.1y0wPzc'.~~

QC J.k Todd i\.....~ .
SaIl&~Qmsaltant$,. fA
. .

.

f1~~ ..~
__....__ ... II' ........... .

- . . '''.. .........

I
Ell/Z:li/ 39';1d

~I~I5ro H:3T'1\1

6llE"tee

"Z::Z:1l seez:/sZ:/Z:1l

Page 11 of26

~

~

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
I
i March 28,2005 - Page 12 of26

Wake County GIS Site Vicinity Map

Page 12 of26

: !

!
i
I
I
I
I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
iMarch 28,2005 - Page 13 of26

=-

-

Raleigh West, NC - USGS Topographic Map
I
I

,~~l~t:!?~~~' 'um;'m\[(~~)
E/ 1 tJ , ~~~ ~~~~ · '~'~'~~\ ~;
~~~,~ '~\~J ~ VI ~ ~t' k-: ~~~ ~J
"Ii ~~ llt'-l -;'" ~'~
.~~,~ -II ~" po-i~.....~' _~ (I ~(,;~ " ~
~"'~~'~ . I~ n r, __ '),
\ \~ "\, . '. / ~_'" rll' . ""'- '.
~ , oJ, ~ i/W - - .../:J
K '\ ~ I .' 'y ~ .............-...: r d1.

, J ' ~ I J c"" c::::
I 1110 " i _ r .- -' . ; \ ~rt .......... ~ ,

~ ~ .:s.. ,( :c SIT:"" 7 ,;~~~t~~ l.-::
~ iN 'II" \\ ~ .11"1 . .::--.,
i ~yJiJm 1 ~ ,~' 'l I , 1- ~ . C 1 V I

(, '. rj ~ r~ ~'~
I '. ,) 1 c I '- ~ :A~..~= ~~, ~ - --/
! ,I .....""'---..-;;; ,,-'L;"-7/ (,'" 'I ;'p ,~-- ~ ~
: (, '1\'1;:~" ~~-..:~~:( ):JItJQh~),~ ~..;
'- ) f : ~ ,:~~ I -7,r;~1. ' lZ ~,~.
~ 11,\ , .'~ '~,f(J~ ,R . ~~
~-, ~,,~ ("~ i/) fj \~~ [/. ~
).);::~~~ ~~1~~:'~~r~~~,
;:c: , ' ~'~\\lU-l ,,"""" ". '"..r'\ ~ "
~ 7J ::.-J~'\\\~\..L~ II ~l,/;; I~ C; l\\,~

Page 13 of26

t

i
I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28,2005 - Page 14 of26

Wake County Soil Survey - Sheet No. 48

Page 14 of26

...
~
"
=-
!
'C
=
"
'i
~
\I

'Q'
=
;:s
a..
~
oW
=
~
u
~
.llIl
=
"
=
....
o
=-
~
-
~
.
=-
a
"""
a
e
-
rn
II

D

a..
I!
=
=
N
~
=
~
\I
D

Soil & Environmental Consu~tants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
. March 28, 2005 - Page 15 of26

Impact Map
(Scale 1"=50')

~-=g
:z

a..
I!
=
=
...c
~
=
~
\I

Page 15 of26

~

I
[
\
l
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
I
i March 28,2005 - Page 16 of26

Stream & Wetland Photos

Stream & Wetland proposed to be impacted; looking upstream towards eastern property boundary.
I

Wetland at confluence of two streams along western property boundary; no well defined stream channel
win wetland; no impacts proposed to stream at top of photo.

Page 16 of26

i'

\

i

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
, March 28, 2005 - Page 17 of 26

USACE Stream Form Page 1

.I I OFF~CEUSEONLY:
I'

1m

1. Appliclm.s NlIlIle: ~eI) !>,^"",..~... \.,,-

3. Date o{Evaluation: 3 7/0 10')
I!
S. NlIlIle of Stream: IJT h>
I
7. Approxpnate Drainage Area:
I
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: '" 100 I'" . 10. County:
. I .
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads 8IId landmarks):
I Sk\I....c.h.r .
I r

12. Site eol,.tca (iCknown):
I!
13. Propos<<l Channel Work (iC any): 0 i pea
Ii fo
14. RcccntWealherConditions: rli;"e<! ... \" J-...,,, J.......~ a~

15. Site conditions at time of visit: $,-,,",,",<..1 / ur.kr-t!o"","1r ""'I... t!.k......L

16. Identify IlDY spccia1waterway c1assificationsknown: _Sectio.a 10 Tidal Watem _Essential Fisheries Habitat

_Trout Waters _Outstlnding Resource Waters .. V Nutrient Seositive Waters _ Wa~r Supply Watershed -<I-IV)

17. Is there ~ pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation ~int? YES @" If yes, estimate the water surface area:

18. Does + appear on USGS quad map? YES ~ 19. Does clwmel appear o.a USDA Soil Survey? YES @)

20. ~ ~alershcd Land Use: Sb % Residential _% CoUIIJICICiaI _% Itldustrial _% Agricultural
I: _%Forcsted ~%C1cared/Loggcd. .SD %Othcr(l""~Kt....I;c),,,..Jl

21. Bankfull Width: 3-5/-tf!-\ 22. Bank Hcigbt (frombcd to top of bank): I -.;I. I-'!et-
I
23. Olarmc1slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) .liGentlc(2to4%) ~Modc::rate(4to 10".4) _Steep(>10%)
I
24. Channel Sinuosity: _Straight -2S..Occasional Bends _Frequent Meaude.r _Very Sinvous _Braided Clwmcl

IutructiODl for completion of worksheet (located on paae 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based o.a
location, te:min, vegetation. stream clusitication, etc. Eva)' c.hancteriatic IJIIISt be scorod using the same ecorcgion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the ranae shown for the ccorcgiou.. Page 3 provides a brief description of hoW to review the cbaracteristica
identi&d in the' worbhect. Scorca sbouldref1ect lID ovcralllSle"- of the stream reach unde:revaluation. Ifa characteristic caDDOt
b, evaluated dIU: to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the acoriD& box 8IId provide an ~o.a in the COIDIIleut section. Where
there are obviOus changes in the clwactet oia B1ieam UDder review (e.g.. the stream 110wa from a pasture into a forest), the s1rOammay
be divided intd imaller reaches that display more continuity, 8IId a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a streain ~ must ranac betweea 0 and 100. with a score oflOO ~ a stream ofthc highest quality.
I .
Total Score (from reverse): Sf CoDllDeJlu:
I

USACE AID#

DWQ#

I

..

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET.

2. Evaluator's NlIlIle: ~Io Zw "C'C.l<.~
4. Time of Evaluation: 3".",\
6. River Bum: t.Je",.:,e

8. Stream Order:

1~1

W...~e

I, ~A. i
ETIlaator'sS1&Dature .... Date 3)/(;/(,)S""
TIlls chalUle. 'taluatioD In . eel to be used oDl)' u a pide to assist: landownen lIDdenvU-onmental professionals In
,athering. the data requIred by the United States Army Corps or Engineers In order to make a pmimlnary assessment of
stream quality. i The total score raultfng from the completion of this form is .ubJect to USACE approval and does DOt Imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - versio.a 05103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

I
I

Page 17 of26

i
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
: March 28,2005 - Page 18 of26

USACE Stream Form Page 2

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Page 18 of26

:J
3

.3
I
1.
J
)..
;)
3
;~
3
L/
J..
Y
4
.3
^
1

I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
. March 28,2005 - Page 19of26

DWQ Stream Form

Norll1 Carolina Division of Waler Quality - Stream Jdentillcatlon Form; . VerSlorl3.1

Datel: al,a IeOS' Project: 6l-i\\.....;\r LaUtude:
.
I. 50\, z.,.,cc.k,
Eval~ator: . Site: ~\\~ 9T-A Longitude:
Total Points: I Counw: Uc.~e. Other ~\.:
streain 18 at /fltI8t Intenn/ltent ~.;," e.g. Quad Nsme:
If~ 19orDArenn/s/1f1l:.30 ,~

Its

.~. .J.:

NO.@ Yes = 3
\
0 3
0 ~. 3
. 1.5 0.5 0
0 1 1.5
0 1 1.5
No=O . Yes 1.5

,. .

Page 19 of26

'-

1\

:IlcI...'t/I",,"W1"W~-u.

~lCt"S_,
~
~!

\
DoNamlll ~lSalst.lIII si111
Isttllsi1l~d:stnId~}lia1~
Is blr8l ~ 1lRllIaAna!
(lrDHd14. CRWtH.

VEGnltJ05\ i

. ... ,." ~ . j ... ~

StrIaIm
PlG.
PNEGL
PAC

L
2:
1
4.
,;
6.
7.
a.

QRrspp..
JlIlIcra IjIma
~--

j'
I
I!

- <<

100%

B\'DIOLOGY \ l

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
March 28,2005 - Page 20 of26

DATAFOIW
ROtml\"E WElLANDDETDWINADON
(1987 COB Wetlmib o.liDIlttoa Mmual)

Subdivision
Apes So--';n
Bob Zaracki

TIS

No
No

1D.ialDr
FACW-om.
FACW+
IS

PImt SJ<<ies

9.
lO-
ll..
11.
13.
14-
IS.
16.

:bcaldI4D1za {CuaiIIt ia 1tIcIadIi):
_~tab.<<1'i4aGavp
_A1im1~
_00IIl !
X Nolardl4D&aAvllitll8
I
I:
Pltl4~
I
DIpdlofSllfD'W~ 0-3 (IlL)
I
DIpdltobW_iIlPlt: O-IS (ia.)
I
DIpdl to SaI:IIaM Sclil: 0 -IS (ia.)
I'

.1;.'t/IJ3"-W1lW~-u.(1"1)3.'2I,*,l:21:>>AV
1
;

StDtum

tdIII4~~
iltlz1ty I:I&allIS:
~
-!..SacatI4i1l Upper 121l1chu
_WlaMrm
_OIilI.il:lH
-~DIpcm
~PGa:smWIdaalk
SlClIll3yhtaran (2 <<-JIClIIiM):
-!.. OIi4zI4loocClamlels ill Upper 121ldla
_WIa~IAaws
_ twI. ScllSlav1JDara
_F~NartlTut
_ Ok (E1plIil1mllll:ll:ks)

Page 20 of 26

3Jl7,'200S
Wm
Nt

WtI:laD4

1D.ialDr

'-

,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
! March 28, 2005 - Page 21 of26

50:-11

Mq U*NIlIIa
(ScifiaPbbt): Webadku silt lom1 DlmIpQau: vtET~4nbId
I lW4QlICW.1illllS
TmIIIIay~): F1~~ CdmlMAppld 1JpI7 No
I
I!
P>>&~
D4plh II :wam CGIIr MOlIlI CoIars Mocl!I~ ! TGII:I. CcIIaIlia.
(ixha) I ... Harizcx1 (MtmsdMllUO tMuDHIl MlIUt) Sla'C4mrut ~1tC.
O-d \ 'AI IOYR4<'2 :silt IoalII
6-10 i 11211 100"1S/1 siltvckylGllll1
10-20 i~ 10\"1411 1IDtUllClydaylolra
I!
H}'ItitSOll~
'RI'-"11: _Col:acicxll
=amc~ _ 'Sf)i 0rpIlic CoalIII ill Smfala)w m$a4ySails
_rd!4kOfar ~ Stlw1iI:tia Slardy Soils
_.~ltIPmI --x- llstI4oaLoal H}- SoIkList
..L1.tklIc Coadilia --X-llstI4 oaNltiAml Hylfdc SoIls LIst
-
X ~.~Colao _oo.~ialDlrks)
- i
lamb
· W_Q7mlIy.NC SailSlnly1tfilnccl4

,
WETLAND DE1!1WINAItON

I' I {ClttIt)
Ii)~rk VtpWiaaPmG? Ye {ClttIt)
I'
Wttlaa4~PAsmtl' Ye
Hyadt Sells PmG'1 Ye i dIls SaciglI.iq PDiIt Wlda I. WIlI&l1 Yu
I
RIuks
\
.

5.cI1.U'9mwwr~-=llal(1 042,)3al~S~~

Page 21 of26

I
I
I
Soil & Environmental ConsUltants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 22 of26

Ila:INU..JJXWlltliladDlllllll'lUaa
I
I

DAT.-\. FORM
ROtiTn\'E \\'''E1L\ND DETDWINAn~~
(1987 COB Wetlmds 1>e1inenioa Mm1W.)

~-,
~
~
I

Tes

3/1712OOS
Wm
Nt

DoNGm:lll'~alU.l1II ma1
Is alia~' ~GAt>pfa1Sill1a1lo1D)'!
Is amal,plfI:IIial ~Are!
IlIGIl. CRVItH.)

\'EGET.l1tO:( I '

Uplm:4

No
No

L
2:
1:
4-
S.
6-
7.
a.

I
,..~
~.
QMim.s""
~~

Sbalucl
NT
NT
NT
NT

IlxIiallIr
FM>>
FM>>
FM>>
FA.C

PIct SJ<<its

: SlRtIlIIl

1zxIar<<

9.
lO-
lL
l2.
ll.
14.
IS.
If.

III <<

25'''

II\'DJtOLOCY I

I
FlaI4~
I
DlplLofSlafla WIllE 0 (jI.)
I'
DIpIL co Ph4 Will: illPit: > 12 (jI.)
I
DlplLcoSlrGldSoil: >12 (1IL)
\
1la:8.U.J)3f.W1IU~.....u:.(1 af2)1.'2ItWl ':23:J1 AM
I

Ida4H)11101o&J :TII!'iaUD:
illiII:iq~
_'I1JJm4Irt4
_ S1ttJI:aW.m Opper U1IcJIIs
_Wmt!Ub
_DriAlil:lIs
_S~DIgom
_~PDa:amWItIII4s
StcaDlIaqlldlc.an(2<<-~
_OIJ1Ia4..OIImlthm t1ppc UJDa&
_Wmr.sail:ll4laws
_ldScli Slaty DIM
_FAC-'Saal1tit
_Ok(illplailmRa:dJ)

Page 22 of26

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
I March 28, 2005 - Page 23 of26
I

litc,'/!IJm6.WVC'plI1lilDlllflDlUlm

I

SOILS

)(q thiI~ I Cecil smdy loam i WIll clImIcI
(Sciasd~ DDl:aIp C3ass:
I: pw! QlI&'\lI'liGas
TJxaIGmJT): n7* Ktm1Io;WuJtt CdmlKlpdTr;t? No
1 '
PlDme DuaipciaaI;:
D4plh ! MIIziI CGicr ~eom MacI1I~ TGlIZ't. CoIIaIlia.
(irdIs) I Harizm (MaIidMoiR) (MlmsIll MaUt) sa..'CGlmI.u S1l1lc1Ilrt. c.
0-6 lAp 7.SYR.4~ smiy loam
11-11 BUt LmlSII day
11.]4 IImt 2.SYR.4'1 day
II
i'
i
i
I
HycWcSell~
I
Rl-1 I -~
mmc~ _ 'BirJ1 0rpIlic CoaIIIll: m~l&)w mS&1d:y SaIli
-~~ _0tP:J/C ~isSlllldySails
_AJf*.~1.qimI _IisrA4ocLoal~_SoiklJst
_WrtJ2I~ _J.J.sw4ocNllia:lllHJtic SoiJsLisr
~ar~C6lIn _oo.~iIlltalrb)
- I
a.ms 1
! · w.. Comlly. NC SoilSllvlyafinr.a4
,
: ,

! '
WETL\ND DETElWINADON
I
B~V""Pmmt?
UrM:lal4Bydr1i1&y PRscC
Brddt Soils PttieDl?
I

No (Cimt)
No
No

I

(CiEde)

Is dIis SaIl:;IiI:& ilD:IIl W'uIl3l W.:Im41
f

No

a.ms

.

I
i
I
I
.'I.1.;9mW1.'tl'~IDIUlm(1"2)30~'2COj ~10AM

Page 23 of26

..

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
( March 28,2005 - Page 24 of26

I
01l26PG00259

1
II

,
I
I
I "
I
!

.1
I

.

8IlOK1726 1'AtE259

I
I'

NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY

01, .

THIS DEED. made and entered Into thl. 11th d.yof Augult I IS....!!.
by and between W. H. THOMAS, unmarried, party of the tint part, of Wake County. North Carolina, and

AIlTJIUR 1lOGIRS S1l!lMBRLIH and wife, AGNU. COCIl1WlB SllMHERLDl,

~ the IIIeOIld part, of

Wake

Harth Carolina

Counl1.

WITNESSETH:

That ""'d party of the first part, In conelderetion of ONE HUNDRED <'100.00) DOLLARS and
other valuable eonaIderatione, the receipt at which fa hereby acknowledged. hat bargained and 801d and by

these preeenta does JllUIt. bargain, oeD and convey unto the part i88 nt the lecond part, ~

heln and _1M. that certain tract or parcel ot land Iltuated In Wake Coalll1. North CaroUna, and beIq
W 34 of Dalryland. eecordlDg to a certain mep and larvey made by 1. McCree Smith.
C. E~ eaId map being recorded In the office at the Reilatar of Deeds ot Wake Counl1. North CarclIhw.
In Book at Mapa 1963 at page 49. and more particularly deacribed as follows:

'I.' . f.

BEGINHDlG at a etake marking the eoutheast intersection of Stillwater
Drive and an unnamed Itreet aa shown on a map to which reference il
hereinabove made; runl thence with the louth line of the laid unnamed
Itreet in an ealterly direction 173 feet to a Itake; runa thence
South 10 degree I 24 minutel Welt 172.4 feet to a maple ItUmp and new'
trunks on the edge of Stillwater Branch; runl thence in the lama
direction Co the center of Stillwater Branchj runl thence down the
center of Stillwater Branch 217.1 feet. more or lell, to a point,
the point of intereection of the centerline of Stillwater Branch
with the east aide of StUlwater Drive as projected in a lOUtherly
diractioiij.:runl thence with the projection of Stillwater Drive in a
northerly direction 4.3 feet, more or lell, to a Itake in the ealt
l1ne of Stillwater Drive; rune thanca with the east lina of Stillwater
Drive in a northerly direction 72 flet to the point and pllCe of
beginning. :' I '
..,' , " ,.

. "

: ".

~".;"

"4 ..,

:": ....

.\:.~

". '0

\ :

I

....!

':.

,i.t'

. '0. .,

'&'1..

, If" ,.. ,. .,/,. r....
,
,,' .. '"
....1
'1 I,
.., ..., I'
'/ tJ.nt'f.' ,"

~q '1.1Sl1' Y"f seo

;t
~~ 1.

.~ ~-~.. ..
I . ..,

l ~J~

....".... .

j ~.. lui ~' .

.~ ' .

'j~i ..4 'ili::Hltg j: Ii

.......

Page 24 of26

I
I
i
I
. ,
!

I

I

...r

i

.

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 25 of 26
,

B10112lG0026,O

I

f

<)'.

:~

i

.J
..,
~

.1

I

BOOK1726 rACE260
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforeaald tract or parcel of 1aDd and all prlvllellU and appurleDaDc:elI
thereunto belonalqo unto the eald ~ ies of the IeCOnd ~ and aaa~ forever.
And th.eaId P&ri7 of the flnt part for hlmaelf, hfa exeeuton. admlnlstratorv. heln lUId aaaigns,
C09lll\aJlte with the Aid ~ ies of the eeccmd part, their -ecutors. admIIIIatra~ heIn
and aaalgns, that he fa eeIzecI of aaJd premlllee iii fee and hu the rlpt to convey the _ III fee BImpI.;
that the lIIUIIe are free and dear from all eneumbrancea and that h. doea hereby f~ ~ and
wfl1 forevel' defend the tft1s to the lAlDe agalnat the dalm8 of aD penona whoJDa08ver.

I

COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS ON THE PART OF THE GRANTEE

It .. hereb, COveDlUIted and upreasly asreed b1 the ~ the aecond part fot: themael ve,

their !.slre, executol'l, administrators and aasigns, &8 a part of the c:onalderatlon aforeaald and 118 an
InduC8lll8llt to the executlOJi of thIa deed by the P&ri7 of the firat part, as followa: '

1. That DO structure other than a one-family detached dwel~ houae and private ......... ,MrYante
quartera and outbuildlnp incidental to on...famIJ;y residential UN shaD be erected on &IIJ' buIJdJDa' unit.
One bullclfDg unit IhaIl have not leu than &IIJ' OD. of the lote .. ahowD on a map of DaIr71aDd .. ncorded
m the Oft1cs of the Reglatel' of Deeda of Waks County III Book of Mapa 11168 at pap 49.

2. No building shall be plseed on &IIJ' buUdlna" Dult nearer the unit line of an adjacent unit than 10
feet, nor shall &IIJ' buUding be plseed nearer ths front Una of lUlJ' buJldlq unit than 86 feet.

8. No tnaiJer, ......... storage houae 01' other outbuUdlna" located on 01' erected OD &IIJ' lot ahal1 be
lJ8ed .. a d....Ulnlf. temporarll;y or permanentl;y, except quartan for eenanta emplo;yeel by oc:cupante of
the dweIIlnlf. DOl' IhaIl allJ" realdence of a temporary c:haracter be permitted. No eenanta h_ or lier-
vante quarters on &IIJ' buUdlna" shall be uecI .. a dwelling until the main dweU1nar house OD the bulld-
mlr unlt Is CODlplete.

I

4. No one-etol7 c1weUlnc hOUle on &IIJ' building unit ahal1 encompau leu than 1260 square feet of
floor area. and no dweUlnlr hOUle of more than one story shall encompau leu than 1000 equue feet: of
I floor area on the flnt floul' and 800 square feet: of floor area on the ll8COnd floor. Computation of floor
area shall ezclude huement, porches and attached Pr&lr8L No dwelIlna' houae erected OD &IIJ' bullcIfDg
I unit shall exceed two storl8llln heliht JexdUcllng basement) or be erected at a cost of less than fl.OO per
In ad itioD to the cQvenant, and restrictions herein contained, the
squarefoutof1naldef1oorarea. grantees, for themselves, their heirs and assigns, earee that DO one
.tory, dwelling house on any building unit shall encompass leu than 1400 square feet. of floor ar.a.
i II. No bWllneu or trade whatsoever shall be canied on upon &IIJ' Jot or bullclfDg unit, nor shall &IIJ"
'acta or omlssIona take place IIpon eald Jot or buJld.lng unlt ...hIch ID&J' be 01' which ID&J' ~: an &Do
IIOJ'lUICS or nuisance to the neia"hborhood.

. II. No swine, poultry. rabbit&, llO&te or cattle aIIaD be kept OD the premises and no encJaeuru for
houslng or CODflulDg the lAlDe shall be erected or malntalned on the land henln conYe)"lld.

,.

, '1. Until such time .. ths Jll'O)l8l'ty here1nabov6 described sbaD be taken Into the city llmlta of the
I Clt, of Ralelp, the OWDerlI of the property shall construct driv.....,s with culverts over the dralnap
I c1ftch.. along the sid!, of the streete III lOch a manner .. to meet the minimum nqulremente of the State
HIghway" Publfc Works Commlsalon for the InstaJ1ation of culverts and drivew&JII on roads accepted for
~ntenance by the State Hia"h,.., aDd Public WorD o-",l..\on..

I
i I

8. ArI7 private water and _lnataDatlon servlDg &IIJ' cI1reIlIDg h_ or other ~ ~
I eel ,baD compI;y with the minimum requlnmente of the North CarolIna State Board of HeeIth for auch
In.stalJau-.

8' Jl1l.1SC lvrr Silt)

.An.clii[---....-I~.Wl~. .

.l r -1.. l:...~....,..... ..

...
.
I

~......

-.

Page 25 of26

.

!
I
I
I
Soil & Environmental ConsultJnts, Inc. Project No. 05-9356.wl
i March 28, 2005 - Page 26 of26
, !

Oq~r,G00261

!.' I
I

-,-
I
I
;... '~':V .J J

B

. 8OOr1726 PACE26!

9. 'l'blllle covelWlt8 end restrictions ahan run with the land end ahall be binding on the partIea
hereto end on an peraona claiming by. through or UDder said parties UDtD lanU&r7 I, 1978, at which time
an \If the cov8llants and rutric:tlons ahall c:eaae to be In ,effect. '

. to... I '.... " I R.
10. Invalidation or aVoidance of any ona or mOre 'restrictions an" C:OveJl8llts by Judic:lal dec:ree or 0p-
eration C!f law ehall not invalidate tboae restrictions and covensnts not 80 avoided or invalidated. .

11. 'l'b_ covenants end rutrictlona ahaD Inure to the benefit of, and be eDforceabla by, any penon .
or persons owning III Interest In aDylot in DalryJand above referred to.

.
,
I
.j.
:\\

I

f.f

I.
~

t

I

. .
12. J! thellJ'lllltee(a) herell1ahan eleet to..1I the pioperty hereinbefore deac:ribed at aDY tbiut before
the co~c:ement of constnlc:t1on of a dwelJIDg thereoa. the IlJ'lIIItor ahaD have III option to purebaae
said property for c:aah In III amoUDt equal to the aaIea price paid to the IlJ'lIIItor by the IlJ'lIIItee(a) h_
In. pia five per cent Interest on said aUlD from data of deUvery of thfe deed.

IN TES1'J)(ONY WHEREOF, the said puty at the flrllt part hu hereunto set hie h8IId aDd aaal. the
clay end year flrllt alme'wrlttlmO .1;

i:: i: ) .
/lAJ: AI-. ,11~ '(SEAL)

- NORTH CAROLINA: ~ '
, WAKE CO NTY :

:: I, 2:~ t ~.~. a Notary PublIc:, certlf7 that W. B. Thomu,
1IIUII8n'Ied. Jl81'IIOII&II1 appeared before 1118 this clay and ac:JmowJedpd the due _tIon of the fOftllllnlr
lnab'ument for the p~ therein upreued.

. WltD~'m1 haDd and Notarial Seal Ohl.
~~~{<, :..~:.:~\,{lJ' ~:l':t..,;.
~:;.;:~:; ." ~;~:;,.~t'i "
'~~~~~1
I ~,1~:.r..' ."
I ~~t.""f'~"/'" a:"'f.' l'
~'~cif' 1~_ :t'~ _
I ,.. I:,.,

tL '
I! l~ Z:Il~r:-

,.

I
-

~ATS c:6 --- cza,IIGLIIIotl~.p .... \lIlL '"
w.. ,""" (J..p .~~ ~ IfUV>
ftIIA~~Uflty. sta I..:g..
........ ...--.....~

:t=~:iJ

flied for Registration atg::?~o'CIOCk~M
!!t"~,?. !966,. 19 _.' and re!!lstp.red In the
Office of the Register of Deeds for Wake County
North Carolina, In Book 17.Jh Page..li!l
,19_

>>.a.~
~~/'Ji@n{~ REGI::::DEmS

~ .-JII

. 'iii, fl

...:

~~fI'1

l'ik/' . -II. .- "T

:..iWl ~~ ....:T_.... ..

If

Page 26 of 26

'<"f.:"'j,-

I
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
I
NC Division of Water Qualitr

Check Number:

Date:

03/28/05

Balance
$200.00

Check Amt:
Discount
$0.00

Tran # Invoice

Type 1

Involce

Date Reference

6356 032805

03/28/059356.Wl

~~@
~-<1, ~ftl
I;~~~ /Y ..? 1Y&
~J'''P. cf ~
~~l' ~C/) I"//J
J'il ~-? v'J'! W
~9(f. I'
~l;s, '1(/1).. I
1>$,% 1
't7y

05052$

/........

017461

17461

$200.00

Pay Amount
$200.00

J'
,".'.

:"
~

---- .