310685_Inspection_20180809

Number
Type of V, Cont
Reason for Vi.�Rout_e
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
- F6—K37 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Arrival Time: Departure Time:O County: Region:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
M �l el
Onsite Representative: % 0 1'\ Lt Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to Finish
to Feeder
rto Finish
Farrow to
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number: I f ( z
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
IN
Non--
La r
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
ers
V
oults
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made9
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes <0 Q NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
e-M
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 21412015 Continued

Facility umber: `3 - Date of Inspection:
Waste/Co'Itiection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �2-�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Io _❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes � o� ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [q-116 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑Yes
E3No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
E
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
p4o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.))
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13 Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW1!v[P9
❑ Yes
d No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
To ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
E310 ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ETNO ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ErZo M NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑-lTo' ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑Maps ❑LeaseAgreements ❑Other-
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Io '❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA F71-NE
Page 2 of 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: c;J - _ I- Date of Inspection: /
24. Did e facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ' El Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28 Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑- Et_
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWNIP?
❑ Yes
[TTo ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
LEJ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
0ITo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages -as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 % 73ak
Date: � /'
21412015