The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310656_Inspection_20181204J Division of Water Resources / Facility Number - (� Division of Soli and Water Conservation �// Q Other Agency Inspection Reason for Visit; 9� Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral 0 Emergem Date of Visit: I I % I 141 1 jQ Arrival T_im_ef ` 1/_ 1 Departure Time: Farm Name: L�JInt'1 ? Owner Email: Owner Name: " Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: y O Other 0 Denied Access County: t� (i �1 Region:F l OnsiteRepresentative: OLI( l .fMIAILL Integrator: Certified Operator. Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feede Farrow to Finish Other Other Latitude: Phone: Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. IN Non-- La er Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge mach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No [_]NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 21412015 Continued Facie Number: Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes A No a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Identifier: I Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):_ ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [—]Yes rrrrr��r��(((((��II No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) �/ 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �)({ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? {� Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 10 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Other. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ StockingED❑ ❑ ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakes on imgation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued I'll J'ri . Facilif Number: 621 iw jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes (�� No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. !� ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility'fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 11E Other Issues " 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �I VVV""" 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes j�iQNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) ZZ�� 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlmspection with an on -site representative? ❑ YesINo ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question il): Explain, any YES answers hd/or any additional recommendations or any other comments, Use drawings of facility to better explain'situations (useadditibnal pages as necessary). cSbi1 O+na4sis s(i� -j 0 �W (L.�_11A)./ lLw-e Co ►� ota A V-2T - �rb� ve_ Lv is Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Impector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Loa Phone: ID - cite-73 l Date: 21412015