510070_PERMIT FILE_20171231

E}DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
[3 DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine ;` O Complaint O Follow-uE'of DW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection �
Facility Number Time of Inspection E— 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1?5 for 1 hr 15 min)Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing]
JG*ot O gerational 1 Date Last Operated: .%............ n (r,
..................)........................................................................
Farm Name: ............DV'!tlW..........D/.4:k-el..............��/�'k`7.......................... County: ...... J.0-d.A%.6..r0...........:.........................
OwnerName: ............... .......... .......... .......................................................... Phone No: ............ ...........................................................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ........ Phone No:
...........................................................................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... .............................,..............---...................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative ...... ,��i1F ................F elf( .,................................... Integrator:..................................................................................
Certified Operator :.................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:............
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 1 �9 Longitude " 6 0.4
Type of Operation Designs Current ;Design :Current ` Design k 'Current
Swine :13 , Capacity' yPopulatiod Poultry Capacity .Population Cattle Capacrty Population
❑ WeanEto Feeder ❑ Layer ' ❑ Dairy] Feedeo Finish❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder Total Design Capacity
Farrow to Finish
r
❑ Other Total SSLWz
31
Number'of Lagoons 1 Holding "Ponds l ]❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ElSpray Field EJOther
a, Ifdischarve is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify i)WQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [--]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —T
6—Is"fatlity not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operaior in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storagexponds on site which need to be properly closed?
i.
.Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any'of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
3:
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an 'immediate public health or'environmental threat, notify_DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequaie`mimmum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)
17.•„Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? .,
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
•20.- Does,facility require a follow-up visit by same.agency?_ ... .
'fl. -'D- id tzeviewer/lnspector fail to discuss reviewh6s'pection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22./boes the faciliiy fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
—��) acv %,A)%,A)&
� �, r 5TZ ��
-
6 ce vex- C/a- � a,
5,0z, HCS
Reviewer/Inspector Name Y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes, ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Sectio)4"Facility Assessment Unit 4130197

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 24, 1997
Paul Dunn
Dunn Dale Farm
659 Dunn .Rd
Selma NC 27576
A4&I
±&JrJh
FE F=I�
Subject:
Dear Paul Dunn:
296
� � 5
Removal of Registration
Facility Number 51-70
Johnston County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your .
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H ,0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management pian.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to 510,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poul with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
-Yp'R
cc.�al.eigh WaterrQuality-Re`gional Office
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Afrwmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number 51 -- 70 Lagoon Number .1,,...,,,..,. Lagoon Identifier
.......................................................................
O Active O9 Inactive Latitude 35 38 42
Waste Last Added 1/./ ..................,,..,,. Longitude 78 16 21
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map]
GPS file number: 151 a70
Surface Area (acres): Q,4
.........................
Embankment Height (feet): ................................
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? 0 Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? O Yes 0 No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0<5 #5-10 0>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspectio date 3/10/2000
appearance Sludge -gear Surface
lagoon liquid
O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
# No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status Oi High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ication equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield O Yes 0 No O Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments Owner had one hog is Last operated arm in '93
need to contact daug - for farm info.
kw--
) Yes 0 No
-1W6
Is currently in home and
,,;4o
y/o dye & ZP4 . -&-- ►Kc-.7-