510065_PERMIT FILE_20171231

I
1Type of Visit: (D 70'U"t"inc
ce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
(Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: F7T� Arrival Time: ij Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: ) 3q i- he, L�!I2 A, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design "Current
Desigq
Current
Design
Current
Sw�inei
Capaty:
Pap.
WetPoultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capa ty
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
fo Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
IDairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
U PouIt
, ,
.
Pap
Po .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Elulum„Rs.'H/IR�atfWnletlx¢xiw4lmnll/mIv11NAi�uYMxllleanawaf��fv1�YVI.a
Other
fwac..lm
1l�IMnnrinufalllle{rxy131�W1wwWylY.i.Yrtllwvl
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Fieid ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? El Yes N NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [] Yes N
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility umber: / - k _j 1 1 Date of Inspection: It
Waste Collection & Treatment
` 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2, Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
2 Zo
❑ NA
❑ NA
Structure 6
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesVNA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No�NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑ l ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 136P 1�7 &dl1-i Sh?49 r ?- f •►
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 7r NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
R_eguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Amber: - S , Date of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ NN �] NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA [] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No6 NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [] Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
s � -pap
IV U 5 l t,e SLLYVe�/ /7Ie e-
� I
('P 4e—
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
4 n1 � 6►l c 6 Ne'l
Phone: ?9 ( qz,)d
Date:
21412015

,Uvj r" I)a119117
Type of Visit: IWCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit. I'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I I Vwl f�[—� Arrival Time: Departure Time: ' y County: Region: Rao
Farm Name: RwW Mc,Lk j Polm Owner Email:
Owner Name: rtj tt E cLamb Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 52,1!E JVe_AW SD t+i/ fit S
Facility Contact: 7�hn L�,adai _ _Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Z4f) LA 4 d 23 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Tmhn Lai'do1 Certification Number: 11776
Back-up Operator: ry, tyn 2�a _ _ Certification Number: 12-7&p I
11
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
r
Finish pNone--Layer
Cattle
DairyCow
Design
C►►opacity
Current
Pop.
FeederIF
DairyCalf
o Finish
DairyHeifer
o Wean
EF
Design Current
D Cow
o Feeder
Di. .P.oult . Ca aci l;o ,
Non-Dairy
o Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
ENon-La ers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 5�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

lFacility Number: I Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
15D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: V/
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ei No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Eff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes t@ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes rO No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: S1 - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? []Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
15? No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) .Explain any YES'answm and/or any additional::recotnmendatibbs,or any oth&,comments-�' I
Usi�*iawrngs offaciiity �to,'betterex lain -situations (use: additional pages as nece'ssary):
a6,'lOhn needs as 1rs 4 r, leo, needs 3js hri b 1a13111 <'5� co��i,vh� ed
s jvd S ion v4M 'dow)
s� b h �� p�2 aol$,
W� ��� l Sod � �'}' aoi KD °�iat.. � balms 0�'a)o1{6 YVOo 93� plen—, CACh'I f� y1 Y
-7114117 W000300
5� 15Ih 1NOD 1$711
Io�la�ld ryppalq$ 5-0No��olf7 r
yvOb ` oq$ e,dpivba o 19
1 �r�W0000
�P� n� M+0 WO I b e_� e-)ASt , `f htfl4iis + a 310 o4dt-
i s behve,91 n5' �-k-1 u a� ><! lama r -For-hals har t a1w� t4bl* ovro 6rc- to
swig bvylr?,e.� 4 clams o `i l�f �,i 1 - Mah�a� �►' 4 RaiYll rPrazls
�: l d�1o�r C 11l�P'
1� v�t�2r'1'�P�}3if1Qc{l�'�l�h �2fA'e .l
I�eve.� �stx7 d h� h gain al{1 Not hoe, acfes� Cali bra�qqba� ►e o� � i �
131 f f is v �fio dare,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: t nn/N 'sg&fjQT Phone: Iiq-jq1-q)39
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Divis""ion of Water Resources
Facility Number 5 - ® OO Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: i$ Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral (:) Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
+311 % tvs �_1���
Date of sit: Arrival Time: De arture Time: County: '6 Region:
s
Farm Name: R�bp�r(Bryltj _ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: FQy�p L/�� _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 3-33Y VC 1 j 50 0 ERWO7
Facility Contact: �-ohh Laio& Title: C Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: H.B
Certified Operator: "30Rn LOUyTTi 94 Certification Number: 1-11 %%J
Back-up Operator: t 1 j. 4o L don Certification Number: I17
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Finish
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
La er
Non -La er
Dr P,ouItr;
La ers
Non -La ers
Design
Capacity
Design
Ca aCi
Current
Pop.
Current
P,o
Desi&C*rent
Cattle C«apap.
DairyCow
DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
feeder
o Finish
o Wean
EFarrowo Feeder
4
o Finish
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream ImuactS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation`?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit ,Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
tR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the perniit?
❑ Yes
�2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
FX] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): SjUU TA*
13. Soil Type(s): Gf�Odjl,f�i►ri�l�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA [] NE
[:]Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes CR No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ' ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1�] No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility, Number: - Date of Inspection: C1 11311&
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 15j] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [,�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
[DNA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
C] NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
[] NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):-Explain-any..YES answers and/or any additional recominendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
br 4Of .6r- .
aKCa({ lallrvlrs by , ti a.sym
-Sof `711311s 5=3_100 00- also Harp 01 y
la�3A�l�v W00000) 1, Oy
w0o6$� 01q1 �,�n
WOO q� 11-7
�iy I IF- NOD 479)L, 6,77
(0 3jgoj7- NOO-Tb�q 0,45-
7, Jom'Ns-ide. bpA n'or m 0 Wd_ Q sf to� -iv *ake C� rv00d i'er,
11111�4 fs
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 70Qn schn,467- „!
Reviewerllnspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 1tQ' NI—
Date: 311,3111,
2/4/20I S

Divlssion of Water Resources
Facility Num=er. �OS Division of Soil and Water Conservation
� Other Agency
Type of Visit: 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I q&DepartureTime: 12"County: 7Q Region:
Farm Name: J
Owner Name: rave No Lam h
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: sy & L 50 IV , A , PfQ3 _.
Facility Contact: LaWdQ) Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ?A n Q- G %G % n %/IM LY ] Integrator: H—,R
Certified Operator: 2bbh Certification Number: 17)70
Back-up Operator: ] 14�.o,% Lb4d 1 Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
inish
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Cattle
Dai Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
eeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Finish
3
airy Heifer
Wean
Feeder
Finish
EF
Design Current
De, P,oult�. Ca aei P,o
La ers
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
.
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
TurkeyPoults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 5'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE'
❑ Yes
® No
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: 51 - Date of inspection: 3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ["No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
��]
Designed Freeboard (in): i "i
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[]Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[5j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? &ICW Yes ® No
notify DWR
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): ilf b'04hl- — - - - --
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes C$a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes C' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [3 Yes 0 No
[� Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [] Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes allo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
lrVf
am! NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facia# Number: - Date of Inspection:
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[,2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
f'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non -compliant:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) Adkdda.
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [,;� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes C�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
dM
[]Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 0 Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
WMI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recornmendativns.or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain'situations (use additional pages as necessary).,
)b '-y-obn has S V de+ efedl+S of cAVh ed ftrnow nettb 361A+dsb fir ,e e115(
awe �
Stu e- s;a,-�hrv9h a01(e. P�easedo Surv� n s ,P�
9 p j
a�}, �913 Ca � t brctti al, 1 1, r � f rn . Plea cal bv,a�e. , �
�m�o�J s s d�e yv�� 4,%Jlys� arw®��e o , P�Itu� w�enoi c
a � N S /eye nA /j 69 o d a S f6a1aw rf TV's
`9pilt1ul Sij SLOD45G� `7I131IS, i1,co� 4�rr�c JeUelswe
� (P1Ibras , Wr �.
Woo-ri�(� 41� � ) la o115 0,19
+aj_cet
WOO Na
ISI �a yl�y o� a I, Pam� �PCo+�-use nil I be rYJ�rjr�- b,► ►�'Ple-
VW 1t$r `� �ro�ciblrmdr�Po� `}o D��- a�
if00%_CG! _ 1, I�V1 f {--- ..A III eplrm 1040,I
'7, i
. I
Bill
1VMA µ W a ��ioM r+
4 I v� _ daIt
Reviewer/Inspector Name
No n`t�s 1�a�e. b,� i Ss ire �ia��, S I�lt�2fA'm waJ
NeFol ed" cop
j•- l�oq-ao -oaao �oC�llc(. �i small (, eglWlao�s
�rbon n e f or Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 V 21412014

u
Type of Visit: aCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: GrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: $; Departure Time: County: Qh Region: R
Farm Name: &hlOr HcLan6 FQ/nj Owner Email:
Owner Name: � � (' ,�t6 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: W, -HWV S-D kj 8
Facility Contact: nqdwTitle: Zee_ Phone:
Onsite Representative: Mhrig Ei jPPn L42,04 Integrator: WR
Certified Operator: } ne (,lQr, Certification Number: 1772Q
Back-up Operator: �1 n L a� _ Certification Number: 1-7 -76 9
J
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine C**opacity Pop.
Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Cattle
DairyCow
Design Current
C++opacity Pop.
Feeder
[Non -Layer
DairyCalf
o Finish
Jr
Dai Heifer
o Wean
o Feeder
EBoars
Design Current
Dr. P.oultr, Ca aci P,o .
D Cow
Non-Dairyo
Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
I I I
i
Discharges and Stream IMMOS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
fo No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection;
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in), 9
Observed Freeboard (in): 3D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[:]Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable -Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): SIM08 4,6121b Qv 3'P'P
//
13. Soil Type(s): J
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E)� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes
rVr No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [3 Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [5a Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ERWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili` Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�rNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Ca No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes f5a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
f,:R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
[:]Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments, (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). a
''ohn ne?ds 1 hr co.6n-,J Pd atd E`'leel n,j- to hrr ol0n�,yed. by la, 13� 1rs-Por bQfi1y�
@cbBlsrc ��+`fi"�
ay Caf i OW a, �a I �I�I (v , Mat-���i� -z cn�• lam lsial(,ai art Cy ally
Ql, V1I,Z G1'r+)S a, -jy U ao� y gar rna�,►�I ,
(.M'eff "t7t l rar n�c�oae �o ��� t., �� . ,SGrn�►A�r�? i'
V�1(�esam�hPl q so{�sah �e.sLO�qn) ��I�� ��0k. G 3L
3 I i-? 16 YV VL1
101c3 wows D�q�
31 MH YvO�J S^11 o I, a�
N&vj� . (� Job 11 VoCe-be
Plfge Pn3t c od' yret -
-7. Plea_)e bash back frltia_+4rV00d ej-f(0.1
i}Q i DnG�SO-6yYJJ 0-f )9667 bH�1
hUe to o(ak-
Ccort6bi a6e n�-O) P0dL"eiIbr�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Sr�j n.p� q^ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:4.An-JULDate: a+ I '+
.a V
-T'-�
Page 3 of 3 21412011

jType of Visit: _Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: IJ2Koutine 0 Complaint 0 follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:Xoh VJ Regio _
rFarm Name:Fox rn Owner Email:
Owner Name: Imo �_n yy`, ,— Pnone`. q I q— 1 q O 10
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: N 19.LL (te
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
g I Ga E_ l e.NCL A- 1, o fv �I
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Design Current Dry Cow
Dr, P.oultr.. C_a aci_ P,o , Non -Dairy
La ers Beef Stocker
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Clther
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
_
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑_/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I /1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? 6T
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

` Facili Number: 6 1 jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E30Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: tj
Designed Freeboard (in);
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes [;�Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ,r o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;2"No ❑ NA [] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;:]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application.
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes J2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the'receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ,E!rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes,2'fIo
❑ NA
❑ NE
IS. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ZNo
f
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes,,d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
,ZNo
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [_J�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 20 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faclili Number: - Date of inspection:
24—Did
dtthe f�kity ail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes�N0
25. Is the facT y �c T pliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o
the appropriate box(es) below. Wjawftpam
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes)z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
f
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes J2110
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes grNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Cotninents "(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendiitions or any, other, comments:,, r
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary), .:
a v 1 Le ZxkAo-Cv 0')
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature;
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:_
21412011

Type of visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I q.4 Departure Time: County: M2 h��1Y}tJRegion.
Farm Name: q' Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title: Phone:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: ahh Lc .'OrAod) Certification Number:
Ij
Back-up Operator: 6-1, n4 C41 6 Ij Certification Number: 1p fn
Ij
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design
Wet Poultry Capacity
La er
Current
Pop.
Cattle
Dai Cow
Design C►urrent
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Feeder
airy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
w
Design
La ers
Current
aia Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
©the
Other
Turke s
urkex Pouits
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any.part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Sslo
❑ Yes T21'No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes PrNo 0 NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ;21rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes (TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes )ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes F`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VfNo NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil TYPe(s): 5tw �,e'��A�n S IA M O.n�(eh t 4 ��L Q_Ll__
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes re_40�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes /5�%o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes YrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
EZ**No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'!
❑ Yes
P°No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
V P
Cam!
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
]Other:
1-1 - c6 023
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes FZTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: S 1 - G 15-1 1Date of Inspection: ay"/`}-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;2rNo
(o a MCM a 01 0 ❑Yes r�IVo 25. Is the facility out ompliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below, doe, a.O I,, T
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JZNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal'?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance ofthe permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1/ No
❑ Yes T� o
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain anyYES. answers and/or anyadditional recoitiinend ations`or-any ott_ier �c rhnients'
xa: ky F
Use drawings of facility to better�,explain situations�(usc;additional pages as,nece`ssary) m , ; ; -, �, , , x g_a
or/ ®r�S' �► ►� rlJ0o 99/d7 ll-ay-ll
� R P 0 1 rI C1 I— r I R trL;Y1 IA-)- Oe) Q qa 9 9—IL, —jg_
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

(Type of Visit: V Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I i7 K I f I I Arrival Time: ti Departure Time: County: �b , Region:
Farm Name: QAhQh ;C1 _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: "Toh yI �miY�. con Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
C►urrent
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Fop.
Wet Po�ltry
Capacity
Pop.
C►attle
Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
—
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
C►►urrent
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr Poultr,
Ca aeit
P,o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Soars
Pullets
101
113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes —ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 12"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
'PI
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ;R<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
❑ Yes
7f No
D NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E�f`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 113ate of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes /VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
VN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
F(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments' (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments':
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).';
n f 1 3 0 1 b (� �� r A ate^--
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerlInspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 0 ` 492�
Date: r) 15- b z
2 4/2 &I

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 2rRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Foilow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: 0 C. n Region: GQ
Farm Name: M12 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: (F� i
Certified Operator: A Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 0 6 Longitude: =°= 1
Design C►urgent
Swiue Capacity Population
Design Current
Wet Foultry Capacity Population
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
El Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I
I
Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
El Dry Cow
El Feeder to Finish
ElFarrow to Wean IDry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other I
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges
�& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
r7 / n di
12128104 Continued

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
6No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes
ff No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
o
ElNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement??(No
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes
/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
Pf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
4140
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments`(refer to giteshonF#): Explain any YES answers and/or any: recommendations orany=otherjcommentst4r Mir
Use drawings,of facility to better explamsituatiaiis. (use additiotial pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name iF :� "; ' _ t� ?� Phone: i' " r
Reviewer/inspector Signature: A Date:
Page 2 of 3 12/ 8/04 Continued

Facility Number: , S Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑''io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box, ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[RfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
121
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
V
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes tNo
o ElNA ElNE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(;"i r / .. •
�� •, y r , � r rM � w�r� <r ♦ � �
i
� r R -i .l •
� i • tr �Q I I , �
12128104

O Division of Water Quality
Facility Number:�0771 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation r {
Agency O Other
Type of Visit mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Vllit�0 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: I Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: E c= 1 �Longitude: = o= 1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Puilets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design`.,;, Current
Capacity Population'
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes _moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[2 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
,2'No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 451
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes ,YJ No
❑ Yes ONO
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement`?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
'❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
L3/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? El Yes
�J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
eYNo o
❑ NA
[I NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: r7 9 f QTJ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of InspectionL
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
.VINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
(� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
/
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
V No
ElNA
[INE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�No
ElNA
ElNE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
/
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments an"dlor Drawengs
U-P o
1I939
..-Q
a ,,r 0_nawAw�n
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit �G-Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 2"Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: county: :10 H NSTON Regionl.J1g
Farm Name: aa(a t i; wat-mmb Fox yn Owner Email:
OwnerName-. Fa m C�..r'���D Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: n h i
i
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: 1 -7 7 7 n
Back-up Certification Number: ) 7 ? to g
Location of Farm: Latitude: =e 06
=" Longitude: =o =' =
Design Current Design Current Design
C►urrent
Swine
Capacity Population Wet Poultry . C�apacty Popnlation Cattle Capacity
La er ❑ Dai Cow
❑Non -La er ElDai Calf
Population
to Finish
FWean
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
} ❑Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ D Cow
Dry Poultry ,
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers ❑ Beef Stocker
❑ ers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
ElNomLa
Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
ElOther
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
,�
2 N
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
P<O
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

r � Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Elio Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structu 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
T Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? []Yes ;?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 'P/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
IL Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Totai Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
J2"N'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
.B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments a(refer to,question y#) , Explain'Yany� YES�fnswers,andlOF ny reco mendaow-tions or uny ter comments
Elit�..
se drawmgsof facility tas t?etter explatnsituattons. (use adtlittonal pages astnecessary,)�.+�,' • za
Reviewer/Inspector Name I \�' [� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 (' e 1 0 1i i o— e) 3 a 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:. — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Co01 1 I©9
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Doe record keeping need im ovement? If yes, check the appropriate box ow. ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA [IN E
J; Waste Application eekly Freeboard ,Waste Analysis Soil Analysis Baste Transfers ual Certification
ainfall Stocking Xrop Yield 'z 120 Minute Inspectionsonthly and I" Rain Inspections �Wcather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? / ElYes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24ll Di the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
S EI Yfpi� 50
�m
2 D t ace ity fail to conduct fudge survey as required by the permit?
(0.')9 1 +' qq Tr} clf_ t+h
26. Did the fac'Ility fail to have an actively certi ied opera or in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
QD No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
RJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes [3 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA [I NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 16 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
{ .: � � tl d R „ ���, �� b'�"�°•tr� Iar,�S�.4r B��a fs�A4} ���i ��f �" +.����[ _ � ��i'S75 v s
Addittonal,Comments andlar Drawn s � � 4
e c-rn ,+ R?P 1 t C.r-x+I o b e re.. 3 3 0 -o
XKIA T_CV-\
w
Page 3 of 3 12128104

FARM 51-65 WHO McLamb
6/15/2008
W07248 4/16/2008 1.3
2/16/2008
73 1/10/2008
0271 6/25/2007
3853 11 /22/2006
3/10/2008
1.2
11 /11 /2007
11 /10/2007
8/25/2007
8/24/2007
1.5
4/26/2007
4/25/2007
1/22/2007
1 /21 /2007
1.2
9/23/2006

~ Division of Water Quality!
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit '�KCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit qlRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: - ! Arrival Time: Departure Time: p County: n Region:(RR6
Farm Name: fit4z-h Layc-, h Owner Email:
Owner Name: Po.-N_M e Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: r l Integrator:
Certified Operator: LCVNaCjn--� � `,[�C� 1` 1 1 E� Operator Certification Number: lick) R I
Back-up Operator: L P E'Yl jl'\be_) Back-up Certification Number: ��� I h q
Location of Farm: CCC Latitude: [= e Longitude: = o =
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedej
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
�_J ❑ Non -La e[
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current;
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Daity Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
DEE Cow
❑
Non-Dai
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:' ..
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: 5 Date of Inspection I E51,28 7
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a�k c oc' I d j c3, q -- 10 r o'7
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
VWaste Application Wee ly Freeboard WJKaste Analysis Soil Analysis-�aste Transfers Annual Certification
Rainfall Stocking Elrop Yield 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
V y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ll No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
El NA
El NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Z7 �� .a . _ cx Y\,5 60 n , v K+�
5 (0 -- r - 0 - 0-7 —
Cc, C a' c
ff O 12128104

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[, �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in).
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
VfNo
.❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind DriN ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
J
Reviewer/Inspector Name C Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur .— Date:
1 12128104 Continued

j ))Division of Water Quality
Ficafity
I` -
.Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
F_ o t � A
O her Agency
Type of Visit 1P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit (!�Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ❑ Arrival Time: Departure Time: CountyRegion: Rp—O
Farm Name: t v `e_"V%N � ck'se yy— - Owner Email:
Owner Name: C- ��^ "�'� b Phone: �� F,)
Mailing Address: !Z C���LG ,SL'" l_� &n^5-6,,,T_(--s„G
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
�c
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: U ,r,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
❑ o
Latitude:
j� Phone No:
Integrator I v` Y �l" ;,�r� r rmp
Operator Certification Number: k `777
Back-up Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer I
Feeder to Finish Q j
Farrow to Wean I Dry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other '
❑ Other
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude: 0 0 ❑ ' 0
Design Cu- n
Cattle Capacity P.opuli
❑ Daia Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures x, C
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes �No El NA [I NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes -M No
❑ Yes
Q1 No
[I NA
[I NE
❑ Yes
�9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 30
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 11
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
if any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes `� No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 31No ElNA ElNE
❑ Excessive Ponding [IHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ff
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind
Drift
_ ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
C
13. Soil type(s) C�, Q c,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP7 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes V] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes I�P!Slo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other commenis.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
57- AL
N c� e s, ram' v 1-
23/
a,�
CJ&._ RA 31�I a 1 Q I ra n �z r
Reviewer/Inspector Name p j ►-v- Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: , Date: Z CD
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

­1 Facility Number:—EP
Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps
p El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes -'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
,UjRainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
FM El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
EP Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
fplNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
BINA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
EZPhio
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: 1
1`'Q V` 4?�4 ` 1UZ-gf _ 2 G. eI - �
Q� � � � 1� !� � � C � �n
46
d�y Jr�
1z-j?)
f8j
Page 3 of 3 12128104

I
0 . 0
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510065 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510065 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 11/27/2006 Entry Time:08:13 AM_. Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Barber McLamb Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Fay McLamb
Phone: 000-8, 94-0E32
Mailing Address: 6812 Elevation Rd Benson NQ 27504
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35`29'48" Longitude: 78°3248"
140 to NC 210, turn right go 0.7 miles then turn right on SR 1330, go 1 mile to farm on right,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: John M Langdon Operator Certification Number:- 17770
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative John Langdon Phone:
24 hour contact name John Langdon Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

0
•
Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb Facility Number: 510065
Inspection Date: 11/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP dated 5/6/1996.
" No pigs since Nov. 17, Will be populated this afternoon.
Waste Analysis:
Date #1
11/21/06 1.2
8/23/06 0.85
3/9/06 1.1
Soil test report dated 3/20/06, elevated Zn-I and P-I, but within limits.
" Reviewed waste application records - complete and balanced with weather codes and inspection initials.
- Very little application and values of waste analysis used are conservative, no overapplication would occur,
Lagoon freeboard levels have been recorded.
(21) Missing rainfall records for 2006, except the months of July and November.
(24) & (25) Please complete irrigation calibration and sludge survey by Dec. 31 2006. (Past due on 10/1/2006)
' Stocking and mortality records available.
* Crop yields available.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb Facility Number : 510065
Inspection Date: 11/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 543 0
Total Design Capacity: 543
Total SSLW: 73,305
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon LAGOON 30.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510065 Owner - Facility: Fay McLamb
Facility Number :
510065
Inspection Date: 11/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510065 Owner - Facility: Fay McLamb
Facility Number : 510065
Inspection Date: 11/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Gilead
Soil Type 2 Varina
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ Q ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ Q ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? Q
Page: 5

0
Permit: AW5510665 Owner - Facility: Fay McLamb
Facility Number :
510065
Inspection Date: 11/2712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
(Records and Documents
.....................................................................................................
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■ ❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
■ ❑
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Other lssues
......................................................
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

0 •
Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay NtcLamb Facility Number: 510065
Inspection Date: 11/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

i'
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510065 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510065 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 07/05/2006 Entry Time.09:15 AM Exit Time: 10115 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Barber McLamb Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Fay McLamb Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6812 Elevation Rd Benson NC 27504
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°29'48" Longitude: 78°32'48"
140 to NC 210, turn right go 0.7 miles then turn right on SR 1330, go 1 mile to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John M Langdon Operator Certification Number: 17770
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name John Langdon Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Records are required for three (3) years for the general animal permit.
21) Elevated Zn (600 Index) and P (367 Index), but within allowable waste application levels
25) Sludge survey due by Oct. 1, 2006.
Producer requested copy of animal waste permit. Message left with Dennis Lund 7/18/2006
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb Facility Number: 510065
Inspection Date: 07/05/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 32.00
Page: 2

I
Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb Feel IIty Number : 510065
Inspection Date: 07/05/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb
Inspection Date: 07/05/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 510065
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Gilead
Soil Type 2
Varina
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

10
Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb
Facility Number: 510065
Inspection Date: 07/05/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > i inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 110011
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510065 Owner -Facility: Fay McLamb
inspection Date: 07/05/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 510065
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit pi Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: / Arrival Time: Z = Departure Time: LL :> County:R
Farm Name: c-p— - Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:c�ol�•�(
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Region: 1242E6
integrator: MdC-Q-R
Operator Certification Number: j_'j'~q a
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: E1° = 1 ❑ {1 Longitude:~ = ° ❑ `
D`esiign Current F i esrgnr
Current
"Population
Design
C*urgent
Swine
pulation
Capacity PoVVet Poultry C pac ty
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑
Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish,
`'
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder`""
❑
Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑
Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
El
Beef Feeder
El Boars
El Pullets
❑
Beef Brood Cow
f
❑Turkeys
Others
❑ TurkeyPoults
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
❑Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Vj No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[IIC Yes
, ,(
J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
�] No
El NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
1
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: S —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?: 1,Sf
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes JVNo
❑ Yes gNo
Structure 5
❑NA ❑NE
El NA El NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C 1&t'DP may
13. Soil type(s) C; j " q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes XfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Cl Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
dY ,w.Y_
Cat`-,2 - C fi c �lk-� L�F aorr S' V8.5 �BF�/r�'RL 4 (r G+z Vj7 p" R
Li�c�oa� f-Vrlval_Y PS' A J0
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` 10 U 14 d�.� r sA � ,` Phone: S"7 Y3 C x zee
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ►.J • -71 Date: 1. ,131 1
i r• u u iru�u�,r
12128104 1Continued

4 r.
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ."No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the C WMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
.
Does record keeping need improvement`? If yes, check the appropriate bo�NiIE
3e 1,
El Yes �'�lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Appl�ation ❑Weekly Frgeiioard ❑Waste Anaysis ❑ sis El Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ Ra #a11 ElStaffing ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
WeatOKode
22,
Did th//e facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes _Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes zNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes gfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes „1N0
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[L1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addiiional Comments and/or Drawings:
61
12128104

Type of Visit ®'Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit CYRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number bate of Visit: t Tirae: = 'fs
Q Not O erationa! Q Below Threshold
UPermitted2f Certified ©Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ..........3 %cz�3��Z................................................................. County:..........aaa.N �T. .7'n"...................:..................
OwnerName: ................................................... ..................................................... . ................. Phone No:
MailingAddress: ................................................................................................................... . ..................................................................................... ..........................
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
2— el l
Title:
.................................. Phone No:.......................................
Integrator:...4�.f�'..5�r ...................
Certified Operator: ................................................... .. . .... . ................................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude ' 6 66 Longitude • C 44
i i`', rDeSlgnl,; Current'-¢ i ' 1, f� ,; ` ` i'DeS�gn, 14'Current sY = , Desrgn Current
;j
Swine ;;'
.;,Ca acx "'�jPa�'iilatio.4PoWhy''
,.ti�ti„.;Ca"aci �Po`uEatioii '::Cattle �.._Ca� act Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
S El Feeder to Finish oD
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Boars
❑
Discharges & Stream Immpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Identifier: ..........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): i
12112103
Continued
Discharges & Stream Immpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Identifier: ..........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): i
12112103
Continued

isacility Number: N — 6 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [io
seepage, etc.) ✓
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ';allo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes &31No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 60
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes j No
elevation markings?
_Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �'! To
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P110
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ HydrauIic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type G.. �r34 +►��i� 1 4-t :�­ 7W • Cr Z
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes YNo
❑ Yes 1 'No
1'es ❑ No
❑ Yes PVo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ONo

1FacilitYNumber: j I — y I Date of Inspection Z 2
Renuired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
2,�io
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Aru al ``aW�ste Management Plan readily available?
WUP, design, It$
❑ Yes
�'i 10
(iel checklists, maps, etc.) !
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
;?No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Free�ard ❑ Waste Xnalysis ❑ So ySampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
JO No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
O'No
26.
FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
01 No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONo
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
NPDES Permitted: Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
XNo
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
i-1 120 Minute Insnections li Annual Certification Form
12112103

ro
a 3
J �
Type of Visit 0C20plultone
'nce Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of visit: f Zd Time:
10'� 1
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Jff Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold;
Farm Name: V � u� Pam____- County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �0_ 13
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 6 0" Longitude • «
Design Current
swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
f....Nu1tr
I_
Design Current Design Current
Poultry
Ca acit Pe ulation Cattle Capacitv Population
❑ La er
�c
iq
❑ Dai
❑ Non -La cr
I
Non-Dai
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste Mana en
Dischar-Us & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
�'S/
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 r
Area
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 6No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ;-No
❑ Yes Z[No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes E No
Structure 6
Continued
P C�(63') 1 90 107 ,Cn9AC'4E

i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
i-r z7 S / 50
12, Crop type C "AU
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated i4i the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or oNnOWaste
Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CertifieManagement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ,�j
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ i4ation, freeboard, waslrnalysis-1 soil sample repo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 9lo
❑ Yes WNO
❑ Yes LJ No
❑ Yes 4' No
❑ Yes [?fNo
❑ Yes J 1 No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑AO
;Rl'y'es ❑ No
❑ Yes ZINo
❑ Yes d No
❑ Yes Ef No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes WNo
El Yes
❑ Yes N
El Yes ;Zo
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments'(refer°'tasgtiestioti #} Explarn`ariy YES answers and/orany-recommendations oranyother comments: �, x? ���,�6
ti
•.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pagesias necessary) x
s � �ield Copy ❑Final Notes t;h
_
j�.R�a�/ S•7.T �.r D; c_+ T}4 `5rAr_r LaG Z•$ 131LL0 a o t: V_V_ e1 3
DSf.S ,,has' cnRit�sP+,t Ta f 40, [.'i JAL �3r�"% /» +GG+L {Sly,
17) l Evrf6j2^41r
r
�• A-'
�� � E
Reviewer/Inspector Name i a o,l ►r- J�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 1 Continued

i . .
Facility Number: —.6,5 Date of Inspection l D z a
Odor Ima
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
zyes ❑ No
❑ Yes � o
El Yes 7No
❑ Yes 1?No
Cl Yes VfNo
❑ Yes '16 No
4yes ❑ No
Additional Commentsxand/or.nrawtngs:+;':', * r <.
05103101
05103101

y/ Z7
aa`..9r t r' �1 -s.2 -.: t j s t - -u 3 -n1 € v_�1t i� i:l -.�a€ j U'• ¢ t
'Other Agency,ifi
ilLy ash ..na i
a i,,,r"'9'a,:. _` A;���Vz € iu •_' '" € v.»� .'...s'l . `: r �i.�','!...x'�` [r! . `r';
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9KRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
hate of Visit: Fz�ime:
Facilitv Number S
Not O erational Below Threshold
Permitted ,'?'Certified [3Conditionally Certified D Registered pate Last Operated or Above Thresh d:
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: r Title: Phone No.
Onsite Representative: `�a rr+l LAW6,2-y .•t ( Integrator: M
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm. -
[:]Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude' 1 0" Longitude •
Design +__Current
� � "� k• �Iiesign iCurrent�: s', 3 � � '
Swine Ca acih'..:
Po. ulation <Poultry 3 o ulatian .-9' Cattle_ i
Ca ac�ty . iP '
❑ Wean to Feeder
[] Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish oaf
�b , ❑Non -Layer
❑Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total .design Capacity;.
❑ Gilts
i'=
❑ Boars
1
Total SSLW rr
a L
aol
Number of Lagoons' i€< ",'
�! '; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
,I
Hnldlng;Ponds 73SoItd.:Traps ` ;s
ii ;?'y ❑ No Liquid
Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & tream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed; was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
estgn <; . Current �;it
acth ',:Po ulation`
I'd
❑ Spray Field Area F
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes PIKo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes ,❑�/No
El Yes L✓J No
❑ Yes 2"No
❑ Yes E;�No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 5 — S Date of Inspection *P__
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Cropi 5'a
type C _ Br�M 1.1�t S- � -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) �ff `
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ i ation,rr� OZard, wisie analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ER'No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes 2TNo
❑ Yes ,2�'No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ; No
❑ Yes J2�Vo
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ;;YN0
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes P-110
❑ Yes J�TNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes fi!�40
❑ Yes :E!�No
inNo violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cnminents,:(refer,to getestion #) �rExplain any��YES'answers and/or-any`recomtrte�ndstions'oranyiotherEcomments.��� � ,'� E' Ei! : E, E � `� E.' 3,�I
.�
E,ne-,FtFEi'.aCoVt .? la{`
v ❑:.L.tIdFF.�ina.a.�l..11N�E..ot..e9.s
s': (use €adYdistloi n,Ea- lrvp!4 a, s ary
to;
drawings oftfaclityt.
ter=explain situatilo.. g
3as n�
E}Ye.
.ca-'es3s�i,
e/-d
I,bE, �e, jnN 1a'
M,�r��
r«
` . _ .K•R•�,a—`.yt'lt '44 ^Y'.. --i ... fin Reviewer/Inspector Name r
,d .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: or
05103101 f ( f Continued

Facility Dumber: s _ b Date of Inspection MIZ-61M,
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
OYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes J No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes V-140
-Additional`. oYf ments and/or, Drawings:!"��' �', 3 ��. „{r, '!`•.` R fi �.-
05103101

ttrort
r.
Type of Visit ,Otompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit _0-fRoutine' O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: E Z 0 Time: �- 3c7 Printed on: 7/21/2000
St . 5-
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
jfw o0
j Pernlitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .............'� P!G? EL....M .LI M.IC ..... M.:.................................... County:........... �.0.W,4 ..s Tb j
Owner Name.
........................................................................ Phone No:
- - - Facility"Contact:-.-.:..:..:..:..:..:.....:.:.:..:.:............................. Title: ......... ........ ... ..... .................... .................................. -Phone No:.........................
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: �RJA =-�4G-o.. r Integrator: M r
.......................................................................................... ........
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ...............................
Location of Farm:
❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude -R • Z(� 6 So 4i Longitude �$ • 33 &r4s «
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
t0l
ean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
eeder to Finish &OQ 1445 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
arrow toWean
arrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑arrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact~
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? -21es ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ,Other
a. lI' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 2"N'o
b. If discharge is observed, raid it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ,0'fq0
c. II' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yeti, notify DWQ) ,E�es o
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;3"Ne
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge`? ❑ Yes )eNr
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structurc I Structure 2 Structure
IdcntiFier : .................. 4.4 ........ •.......... ..................... ._.........
Spillway (--]Yes 'p"Nt
StruCtttrc 4 Structurc 5 Structure 6

/)i GL4 M0
Facility Number: S/ — 6 S I Date of Inspection L a
5. A?6 there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over applicatio ? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
30� f � yr
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? Pa� S•Jfco, P.f.
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily javai(l`a�bble?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Ahirrtal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
_ W 6fp, � .S lzq o0
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irriga ion, freeb6ard, wasteajOysis & soii„5a6nple�z.,redorts)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 12-94
❑ Yes ;;kNo
,,Mes ❑ No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes .1244o
❑ Yes J21rNo
❑ Yes �1Vo
❑ Yes ;2-f4o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes Pilo
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes 12No
❑ Yes )ZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes PIKo
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes Ja 0
0 4•YiOlOtiOris *et- dgeclencies •vt're)M0te(i• Otwiog WS'ns}t; • Y00 wii1-tee$iye oc £iutthet;' .I
correspondence. about this visit. I
Comri�_ents (refer td question.#) Explain any YES answers "d&i any fecommealdatlons or anyiotheir eo�uments. 1 l ,.. , , .
Use'drawiings of facility to better explain site�atioas! (u'se,addttioi�al`'pages as aecessa!'y).' ,,..,,.,. C+"Er G �. !';'If , ;Y s ma h; d�;9
J) /Yta�1, j1(Y 1 S �Ef�J,G Ml},�,.1 �fr•�A,JC �a2 J s 2V pQ-; o.J A•sO r� Pr u�no�� DE�Z �E�
`! D;s c� AttC„r.C(T ��on• P t FAQ $ Q�� 4z r- Le,A d� � G T4F_ S i'T-- - E 4*'__X-j- vfAs QrJAW
' t
i M E„r CPAR-s r ^1rti, . a •re �-I
�-
'[-e&Ms i►tiP�c��
Reviewer/Inspector Name JF F!
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ':n" . ni• j wr. Date: —77-1_ Z4' at 5100

m - Lj%-Ae
1`
Facility Number: —b
Date of Inspection Zu Printed on: 10/26/2000 I
Odor Issu&
Zycs
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
wi�o
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
ZNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the.liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
(2 No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
PINO
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
,21rNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
CT'�es
❑ No
Additional Comments and/or ra , ngs:.:
F* Try O AD EQv�T�rJ c i� 6 o a.J 1'da GL P` j G`rf EJL `
�s .3o T t nn P c _p oAssc-f l Sac c.rrx�.L t `6o�+r �wcE�� t S ` C� R o��
3Z.)
J
5100

Division (of
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine p Complaint p Fallow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 7/24/2001 Time: 8:30 Printed an: 7/30/2001
p Not operational p Below Threshold
N Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................•
Farm Name: Barber McLamb Farm County: Johnstrant........................................... RRO............
Owner Name: Fay & David McLamb Phone No: 894-4632
Mailing Address:b812.Llayation.Rd.............................................................................. 8.ens,atu..NC'............................................................. 2750.4 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:.................................... ..... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,lean.Laiagdoa........................................................................... Integrator: Murphy.Family.Farms......................................
Certified Operator:Jabn........................................ 1,a>,agdan...
Location of Farm:
go U. I miles then turn rignt on
Operator Certification Number. 177.7.0..............
go a mile to farm on
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude . ®6 ®« Longitude ®° ©L ®66
p can to Feeder
® Feeder to mils
p arrow to can
p Farrow to Fee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Discharges -& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes []No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? p Yes ® No
b. If' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? <1
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes © No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatanent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............544...................................................................................................................................................................................................
05103101 Continued

05103101
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 7/30/2001
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Applicgtion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN D Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
© Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes © No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record creeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
© Yes ® No
© Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Co merit refer to uestion # E a>In an it M-1� rs an ° an6i6S�recomissl ] nda�tj� nsfori�anylnott er cominents�',
, y
t ) yMW �`�'I�` +1a�'
IUseidrawtn s -11
of fac�li to Better°ex lain�situat�ans {use additaonalpages'as:uecessary)
g p
;
0 Field Copy N Final Notes
1) Discharge from pit fans; but not leaving the site. Metal housing along lower portion of fan is completely rusted through, and
discussed improvements including a concrete diversion to channel this flow into collection. Producer was unaware of this and instructed
to implement repairs immediately. Flow passes into very dense vegetation which by appearances does not indicate a long term discharge
(grasses dying but not dead for a long period), and not suspected to have caused an off site impact at this point.
7) Mowing for control of vegetation and for ease of observation is required for lagoon walls. Growth was very substantial and hindered
roper inspection. A NOD will be issued to better ensure proper inspection and control of weeds/woody tissue growth will be
maintained. Also, an inlet pipe into the lagoon is broken and should be extended adequately to ensure there is minimal potential impact
of erosion of the clay liner.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Jottnm-KHunt ` ' Nil I r'R �� r �` "�' � ��� ` �"" � � � •'' �� °� N � � �
,1�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

051,03101
Continued
Facility Number; 5165 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 7/30/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) []Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
® Yes ❑ No
.. . eid �','§ 'ip€[ �33 ( i i is€'?:{i 'E :: iij3-3ip -s_ ie§ .sEeE t:�': 9 ld= ai'diPj s1 d i 9�: Pt (: €1tt z,,., i £ + 33 �!-:': ; y @ ¢¢ ¢¢4@ 1'� aEdi 3 r 4 ICI, ?id'rE pE;: 9t ; - r": 1 - -! I 9''� jj i fbb d'E g)�g��g�j3 333}33 3yyyy93 i33}3339 3y-1?3 } } S.£s {{EE. 9E{{EEE((E88 �,� 3333((11 yytt s {Ejy�{ggj€ L! i! a �ggg)gq,$3 € 39e (I {{ E €E E s ]L yg93L�1Bipe)1 !t !! {$5�9P P ¢9 ., € .. p 3k £ _ S'U"
@rd. t.@': i : @`eI`i 'ei€':'!�@ '.FtI s .. 3§liidti;€1e€Iss a9@i:e�evesa EQi13d9Ei39f iE33i3EEita£a£4`EEEE�B�Y�k�:aEl41Y13Y3p s 4FEEbE��i6l.id�8Q6i8edep9 9.fldd+'d9 E.,dB eeee.<<d�.l:.iEldjSS.;}.€.s::Id}tbil.�.ti�t:�:EQ��:.Etpie€ededeQ@':9d9..� �3s QQ:ii1P:¢@33tl3.E. Ldoddi.3x::E�ii e:�i1:..SQ..�.o.
...._._..... (. , E I I ..il.._�LN. d. a EaQ - # �_ _ _ _@ 6?.
.: :,.. ,..�...... . ... .. ... ...... ..... .> ....., . ..<... ,- :;t:.t.,.,� ; .... . ., 1't
268c32)iare noilongerarequlre d ylDw.`of A�r�ryQuality l-:fie
4:[, _(( !l ikF 1 iliy_, a -: f 119 ¢E ,jf@?, �r �: .dicta-sp.[,k} ' !=U�FE.f €IY.,iIp § € i - [[;r C i E[i si § ;' E.. 7 l l a?lt Q.§s� ti r k. 6i rar;
3'✓s h tsffl P 1' Y i�����,yF £� E f�£ 1 t I.i t >Q i Yf II �j w f§ kj «g
is. 1 i ;, a 1 'i.p s ill k a[f ij ��€ Iii, li iilPl,a k {-
n
y fi I
�e - 'p i �VI ':: A :SP f
d a
yL`YOf
k�¢ , ; 1 i p g ?i, a
^: 1:'d:-.Ef:i 37 .:¢:'f a i.� .�+. .� �., . I.e ,.8 38�' Y .
.d:• E F 3 .:.. Fjj[ '' i ii i ..:_ �{E_ `i ...'. : �}y(.ea3.d a E {3 r3�j33��§i�� 1 tgHi ::f:. �` ..�@f3.. _ t e ::) ,' f .@:s
3 3> ss@: !4i 6 �� i:..�3£t.F.: i i q£4..9Y �§ IB 3 39p'P : E. Fn _ ' l! f i.. . pd . 4 ., P Y F.t':''
d.Hp r,.,., e[£e,. i i $a ��9' € { %==E. i ,.-P: ¢6f s@, 9..II i£ 1£.E � 3. ��� ' (Ei � � jj ¢,.._.. { ° R € _. �� .3 3 E _ ¢.._,. (. =9Esg 1,1�i ,. ,.; .. -, I E.._,d � ':':£� � ?-.:. QI'd>=
E €79(¢��$§f_,
`! "�� 5� . f33 ! } ...s i �3ss!{� ! :, d� �d . � �i � : e e H�� e , y i E §jj... £-F > $�13 51: j}�9�! � i @•9 =. �t y
�@ d 3�1385 { E �... 7 •:� i(Y E �g � 9 �p�9..e.6.,4.".£9p
Ep7!`g C.EE[
��8e3� EE(€tlt}{{ �ijj
(
�lt{ @9}�
��
E16
•x <<�t@ rid.. gg`t. i..r 47 F3.,¢k.f !., tes� i...; 8�3�£. t�4 � .§iF=.S' 3 .f� i .. .': ,s
d ge § '1' e. B t d r °.x Eli i.y £-` .i� c-::(:1¢ lFgi ' iB E -.Y. :. �d. ?.i g . f' ., Yi: x€ i Q . �[. f
,i t'r . -'� �.. Eld�l13,Y�.€8 � , t. Et �d¢ .[€ , � € E ! � : -. l ::i t i �, � rt ��:,� � I,�I 6 i , E @ Ep Ei, [: :, ,�; rri f i,#;, � �} €; e: 19 . >s Nil
Pr. I�EE.,g E� � E � d�8 €..�I t�N � l �l� C .. � :
t-, r,r, @ ¢CI ° �N&SS.; ,: t ((pp } 1 - 1 k((e@'., Er'4;""' fl?£ x @ �4(gE @ b§ ! !@ `. § 't9 �,'"' d 1 ! ,r`. f _ 4¢ti ,€ :, s;
� � " r .rF i � �fii� JI �ii {C �� s � �,�� E1�4j{j�E � r. �� E �;i
d Ij` I ff � �1 k k ''
re kF . �i + aC
f' A � M. Y k, .E% S i `£'� r
M �i �
it}I a t�� ('RI q tk�,. :, t i:y der g:> r ,i rd"g p` �1 ` "� F k r°"q� '!I"''
1"d �! F i'.
�Iry
ai ifs 33k:,iu�����. �alk , ;Pr�tP,: b ,,; , .£,:; �,�
rf § I 4 I '� ! i! I! rl. ia1'E 1 wr €x s 1
9?pg Pit � I@ai)! }E
1�� �1FE€ x Pe¢e€. 'CBE E I f E8 r E;.EF �{ tj 1fE yy j
i � <i ik_.{' .a3E• 'ii. { §Q { E I S 8�8 d l..i.
Y. E IIE :C. <<k. ... .3> 3 4.. .'.• � E _1.E£ Y 8 ., f£"x <.. .:33ii f �� ,
F : _ 3z,.a :l 3 � _IFS. `fFF k� @:i •@R �� ,( ��€�- �E €ptlyt i.i.-€(-:x ,, __ r . , sz�S _ �i:. � {R� € eaX e 3 :Ss �q{((� E @ " SM�,.£�� jj( i�7 „.s:.a:.. i t @ � �, " i d(Q{ �_ _. i pp P ate �E1, �"' i� s <t E�,..: @� ..1 .yi
Ii€ i3 . Milk
niE
-:,!!i rli Q{
%1
.i. ^ AF4: F' ...:.
I�-. _;: _] i.�l �� '.„ti I"lt)li� f•r �3_ i:.i. -. :;-. . ! itt :.;:�+t ir. Ep:.,6 '!<, rl::, �. §77E j., i=a e.--: -- rl§�..
t : �E+.,. s. £ ... :,r.,, .:-; a j9 !! .:. ��j
`;
<EE€!}€ ,.-, .,._...,
....•: .: .: j.� 33 ii �...?9?? j�,. �::: _. c£ s{77 :Qp�-:°E da.di. ileld�lr':r.,r j1.!-
E €P..9.,. }.-v-iFx.E•< i€;;!!gg`` Et i ,.( j} 7} q ..$. qa7
I<'Y P-E i€. s;F_
d::: -FxR11
E d 3 f i Y 9 vt fi'[ df xS
! � ( t t t d E it £ _ .pp.Y� jjj li E i. .99.£. i 3 E :. � � 3 izzyyQ 3'v -f£.�4 €` �. 1"• � {{, � ??..
€p � tt�.�E j¢ �
FII._ j8
� � �R.¢ �•. �f.�pE g g p p- � �. �
�1
€{ 4 3d�1 ...x.3 s £'�t.Etg@ji t
{=i�.=.: - S_€:i Ff< E.rt x Y.€€� i. ii:. ct i a p�Pk .g.,.B g� _ ., �.Y9 �d3 f � .l e. 6 ' [ - i i $ ii4a d.� .,: .?iq iigi C :. - Stun kE:
Qt�
t
C :pg<i; Esr. �i�.-( £F €E@ e §� 3}t ii§ii _ §._ _ ?. f:si ge'..pp��,,:F € 4l 1£k i!�Y'! - _ i F 1
€. f.&€E i-.E.. j B i .p�4a a ..
ql ear i r:t , �I�J 1,1 l€ i �� QI 1£ . �.P
k 1 A 1 E pp 11, 11 F[f B II 1 A �`ry f£>•r k1
1'lh�t1FA � ;6 �.:+ ""h V
1 lFj. }.fY I,Qki,!'1.
Ll {Ix: -.!u i
@". . 11 { sR4 i� 71iVx I�Qd
�,. 17 " ., t, §'.Id,+ ,,esit; f I�p� �
i ?.�£q7 J�'y S .,1E y. yF t t 1:ui.. �y;i: p' 3 ! jI i E" : ri+ E
i .[ire' i
Ill i,. liat�
13 �r ........ FF ;rt 1E3. i„tr,!!@.e.i
j( d
1 =xf s41(t k� rS.> S33 it Ij @<E - € 3 37 'eY @
i €{f E
-i E F .:': ii `;.. i �. FF F °E��'::: 3y E. �a3113ASj? 3d .,dlf .., 9' E 111 E--xx i l' Q i I,i 6 € [§ 1 1i
jj {� �((t [( (
?1� � �'
ij .-£ a 1.. ..( .: s ..e d� :. P € S. -- } P I ? .
£ 9 r. is j .ea. a f .E€"<.. �. i': R
5 �€{a. Fx a £ ..i. [( € �:£ � 3 Y .�..P £ e d j! Y 3. S'i �8; 3 { .3 ixa f{E £ S i..9 EE!¢
P I:(E Pp,
({{:E•€ §€a iI(I[3;a I!1 ,'ii ##33 aj$1'7> d�;.(€ ei# i! ¢ t} % ,.jj�..j(i ti. i P j( Eg E a::: - E %E{E€tE _;r.-; I:C .., {pg:s trsitai d..id
Q E.adFaE '''i} � �, ��..: .p. � ti §1.. I �1 pp} p I £
( € ,E§ -2¢j i ' � E.@ .:.. E. I f_..tP .. 7 ? ;i 3 li 33E I i •;:_, t¢: �¢;€E3Px a�it(P
7 id E] f (�gp � ?y jjl�yjp€{,.. °
�td t �..3e�e f€ � ?$'. � pE
�� 7jy}-@,
.. ?.,gg� e� .9 8 9 - .i¢T s r{E e.r.� 3dE : i �. ,fiHj ::.., . ,t...
(H � � 9 f - -8 @, .: �a3l3 .. -:�1{! E€$d( *Pp B d,i $ 1£ i ,. Ei.. P�{ $ fe-�: zi L3,ga„ r[ € j - -s€ ; i
){�1 41r YC ve:cp...eEP$p€d€p5p�(g((((1i[13j{@[r�e§ �9{6yi6EeR_1�� j}{b
E`' � i'•. pA:. g$[{$�9� BF3p E [QEF +l/ dg[>QbiidE� l A„. � 7{ @,,i 6 i'Filk IMF Alt ( I -- [f 4 ... {k - i f ��3 �Y'r'.e ��i�� Ri - l�¢: � L${ t�-y.rFi d Y
i �.,y.ii�I
@j+ '@N�e:F
°I�yf�{�`
E. 3. �.::' �FHPCPE"f t4� : • '3Q � f ,:.
f
aF NNL.' !f 1 4jeF% I t! ,
t t Fi•-:1 »; 4 fi eM i11 :, i` Pf4 FCC qu� t�
V rlr' `V'4
it 0i.'
T SAA IM1 ! T�{il i£ 1�� ��I i Q T{IN� Ili -♦ iiQ. ti
I1}'6. £. J § Y
j1 - :- IYtt r S E ..sef �tPi Ipp r@ J P �� £E i
P .:§.yy.$i{�y t1 ! y'4+ d .�' 11 ik "iy l.. �i.. v. ¢f i`: 91 Y'l .•�i E ^. T-.� y
n _ n 1 1 P'.. ( Q f , :a 1] W V 4 1iI4Jl 'MM�j 1 i11 d 'dN: { _ 7i11 1£PIE I ` 7 Y 14�,., £ i ! x.l 4 I 3 ..IY�r :: 8 .. •�'.
El.+a':' iF .:1:4`11 gq ,11 1
�. t, 3!
f j�d ,:,;' aE ti
> .pr di3; •-.! - � �. � EEyoF i E " E ;y¢� vigd.93. E 'Fj :..,.3 F j Y:-E Y. y e, 1 } i-. y... i i ip
0 ,. e
,. :Z¢i r�i �d....�.��. <�......--
33r p(d:ijj � t 3i �7 ) 3 a,.. }y(( @ " 78 8j,$y
1�15 4.. 99 9r€ e i(ei :: 1gge. ,3}@�♦
€p 8C@EE 1" pfe
pp 3.{§jE5f3( {{p9p} } j}> (I C�S �d°
i4;:f. i y pp $
l�l3t.i„ [8dt.
_li §.377yy
. . -;s -i41 e y€BB.Be. ¢...
4. - 1t i3' i ij Ef, 3i p .. 99 YB } Ps_ dd8 BEST s'¢ 4 Et £Ft N
9:° i. E ! "ifi41 �.i3�9 X$i d. .d i:.,� . E ��§¢pg[ 8 t €�¢ 41(`� E 5 {5p "'� Ild)Ei i�!€Ifflf.. 9. p ?$ 'skrl€' {@i @9 , e C'.. i �EE
t al P� :.9. d.. !EE 9(ppp a€i�.QS ` €(4:f:�..FftE liEf E6 tl.:8'6 p 'fi S E.e E@ {pBp''. i ds �..flE1� {f e9 B. e. E� .1F
�x. d e. ip,£EQS cg o�SB$p�¢p f9pg3��1! i''I fk�. ¥ xf �1.��P4pgg¢ggg Qi p f. ;Q}((tfi.����.
�{,[�E_-;(y
EE H' �k�II��ir4k Y ``Bi1rN J t i `:. Sit k fn�., ('pfi dFIF 'M.iMI 3 �s 1,.' d� '£ 7§i -. di HB h��I i pk
+ Pi}y'F1Ht I� 4. c
T II'r,+, r�FE ��t..
/,i{*l[jJd'IM '�',:r,:yl Jlp /d�a 1.,.::.4�7f�F
t�Il �I : Y! 'S'1^ �'ii§'E:'„i ��. d�11`1'klk:`h '1q-s�l.ji �EII qiJ .�'1 !! P.E¢i71liyt�:.:. Ij� Hi.i �anY I..�q»''7„;F� Iti 1k:d.. 'i•`
£, (( w, NN 99 i
s n, iA l § ai9 Y�fII �i1 a t,:: �u Ri£�:°' i! i if �.,'�� i a fF!" , ' s
:- °i ., :.. f9 ��. da� 1"yi #"s,l } #i s i�t 1
'..��: ley YI°.. f@ 'a3.1,.'1 },
(i "Ids xE G:: l�iir'pp R%l..e---€.ti= x ll 41' ,�; al.d�7 .1 t , L E-: lj•''.
,"•
x , Es;:... r [t 7i ,; ,,?
djj'. ,,. �i
P .s4:.� f: £3#r. i
iE .q .t.q:..� 7Q�a.� .�.
i :t< Fr - . �19.:; i q} p3Q . [[3> }.[P I fay -.� i2.e 6 e ¢ o : �.. Ej .1 �fE{ :l (@ : -)7 1 - .... 61 E E .i...
E{( 1{ [s.. s,�t jt r. g,. id i -€dd b .i?l Yid d I3l4tB d r� eiE ,.. Q tldd "jiQ 33 .FEe �> j a e IifFldsE: ({ Y .. e) j �331 eEEdgs.., . .' £{
( E x[ �£c i igpdd1'-.jjt � .I t.. . kl. E� it(
ppaS,.:�g-i @@€( E{{ IIt. 3t ` p
ss'E9fet�g
j[[ �
tf £aa .,.... .@. ,�b�..7.. :8��-.:f;
jii�EiF.:j(#E€E�� .: i y:i �r .� �t (
.,8. �",�IQ1:.jj t ,�. , iPE� .,....� � i�i ( .0
EiYlif.:t€j3 t I a. 3 $&{ � .1>
ji[' i � n � i ¢ . i ..,. r € j� i (€#a� �� 6 � j{ i - .. iE€EES��i IBN.,..3� 1 !pi $ io . , 8.:��_{[};.; ,_• € ¢9pi�€ � j( ::.y � �,:'@.l�d�p; T :;.; �, i{? ¢ ...�f
if E# S.:i. lQ.. ,E{ i:. d e�f. _:€Ei'..
-. Yjjiki.. M �y}§e8 ( .dll l ai�} 1 iq} i S%i - -
€ f�i s -
� � i ,Rep
y p�g'3
.r. `N' i �Q, f r:33t •y:A �i3E ni N�y .£«t. �d iiJiEixlr F 1d CY
, M�' +�iW(• p, he°_� € §Xllkk�1 > t
,,:ii i. � �,,.,ik` � � ,' � . •:i
y :i -:r i
�t1l-�ij'r°y I } ip'y. I�
1 it
ili is tt k
14iElJli }•.S.d
...�1E£
•&a ,7.a ¢.�.e��i 3. ifi i� _. #).. .�. ?_ t?a 3e'.. 5�, ".. ¢�i 7s. •,.i s
f�tt.: j •°€i[.-li-:". I. i., -,
' ¢" P6 Flll, r ".i E{t
}g�£
(t_ $pE{)(
�d
Pc- r� ... ,Ia :fE1. r,..¢..: .' {)3^. ... t-:d9 x
.Qya tl e@ d333 1 f €€ K�} kE 1d jjp t, e I {Etpp $c @¢ee@e 31 fr:F1j EE Bs 3d¢i 3.3 4. 117r
99�� c(i Pq@rEp 6 ar.. 4 i3[i�]',rj! 3�i j i•-: �t� plpj$il s EE Ep€p €�i Ft.¢ -Pt g'£g, £ ". _ l l d g9p¢p"., dj§f 1 -fjj lj-{ I 5(� ¢ .a.€ y(} y ...1 E(€ ( g }: .1-. �.ti
s li4F -f£F 1-.:[E....jEE of ' ti£ £,F j 3}}j3j ggg�d tl 1§€�Ep§EEp.S. Y.jY qEj F.j€ �Q e e va :"1 3 -f: E.�I€E i ¢E :88�di }? :._.. zj7jj�E .. ,[, y �}i.€� �: B E `t?:.s } 7i§ (§€ ��3i.�jf} � $y 9t9"9.,:.31 .�.9@S t� :d>i . `Q c S .R ._•Ip '.
s�£ :?F-..j i§s F.. qF i4rs£.¢ij3$il) {{ ((p..PPB ePF j$$}"f ::41 -: £ jE( Y(. 7pvp. i -: i `p 9{ .9 [j$( y} 6-:FE(`F_;4(6EE{ j4k¢ f-4 .... j$jy� 1 k', ¢ F•&.:.., iy§jLi'9 i 3 'd:3c07 @° e 9.:f(I $: .y .. ,'.- ,`.... (,,
y. f{. iqr p,,.. QI I Qe � �€ �[{ $7.. (}i 3[i [ 1. 1.
�.
. jppgs__. ££S_S f - -i{ - .. Y::
11.. E3 3$j3tq$ .Y'
: - : 3_i .., $a? ! i€ f �($ i9. FEE¢ i jijil l`.gjp.��€.�f £ 1> f t
§lg.},��3i{{p,f i V it.. ¢Lp1 t,Itti°.i"3 3�.q;p p} �.} �r i3y@�7$�Q>'3ri� i� l` 1.�. iti € t::a� 3: �`- - )ii�pPr �'€ ' x.f n@{C 6',,::1 'I�Q f i ` ':: QQP :: ee d333.1ip$(�i j}f F_...t ,¢ ii§ !:'i : 4i
ip € f 3::Q ?. 2 1'.`rti�i d 11t• f!i, Ir€ k1i l 3 1 1 r i 7 ip �f 1 ? _ E Q F##:-. FE @ tl "t I
{Ifi. I, Q,r�,; 3s it di i,: , `S:= Er E .Ell do �Il�BifC i sil' ° �tl:,
[(+ pY I ,
t l�
r 1 .F� 1
IT` aif4� Y 1 E p E Nr CyNh� ltpll ¢yie G,E d ( y,
:x: 1 l L O .' .� '. �I .I� # r� 'J Ct� I� i ' 4; it
t 4 y{ .r
y , �:, n9.:. ii „t y�1 7 a h l911't� j's '
,,..Enn � ' nrp ! 41 i '1 i��qq gg;;R rr..11 1 F 133ll �r1 l i r� ! i
Y S x.gx 91 j 1 Y <a 1 K* 'Ns; nE: M �i.ti 1 S iP^"k'd S £1N r� .tA !� . 3 ��. y§f YFYEt .. +. s.E,.�i �l � ll f §, 33 : �{9B hfE.� s4:, 7 1, 1 I:;
1,1hi ;;<l4 _ a IMIi E '> 7 t,£ii FE lri.! iE! .• ' F tY1 €,.. tt B )i , ,. , 1"' i'1 (-_S 1 '.� e ' t F yS Syp�
� �
;(P_ $: I,..
�,l)
t-.. E
pE
pE§' i
sFFSx'E{"F§ P. h:..qq• 3¢diy/���93[ iP ie.� d§��}§: i'_..s3 3 1 _§� d
{ k
F�.qq( i. .
}e1:8& as.:.
� F' i�.'ya99 ? 'E e ....{i
< @C 51xi3y a ,.. 1,� n{ : s ¢g( 14E ¢ si2z3 @ .: by
lg i. & vi 3y@p} (.. 9 i{j€ °qSs '?[ ....Q 4E ` s F An'.:°..3€
£# { � dEI�p ��ii�l i �12.d;Q�
e s�F qi, tly #. Qi p A tji i£Ql 1 § 1 -v1 -•• i C @i. f..: �t ;ij1iFElSI(�Qn d A i IIt § .Qp fd; k.Fi1 k -r.'
tY "d[ I
4d 'i'j t k � if I' li6
W t J i,
E� .uT�� i t:€i 11 �k ^ailj i
] i d'' 11' jlgj v rHl k r t F r r E F
4'T0..,J �y
'tj1!il¢ ill ,j €In E 1 isdpasgo . f_ I k�l'I r k fl lry'.�� ?i.. ill I il�� � is'3f Ea• iiE�._ ! p �i�.: t
kI f F £ x.l pt,ll1§ @dp,,..933 -d.;: t t!E SyEld , r. 9
i lilpthe
[. @
.' ¢
$ it E l�... ;� o"r1
{{ j � $
�� p � � C€ � �1 � l.'�l � �
,_pFgg tt <E t 6 E [ 8 y@9 t p. .;jz, . g N € 6� 8 � 8 ..� a:d, a =€. S6� @ ae edid8 t l� "t'�$ tp.°t_Y• :�P-1 a ! t' e?4:. ydl��{E x?�e t F�.. ;l 9ti-'.�3ipe s 4, e : .>'€� :.
;ti( ii., CiF � i l x Ei:€i ti � E6 t �r}}it Q.l.e QR SS��'itd E� ggq,pt d t i �i:'H1 l�l - i €F. s ".,i✓ �.
.p:.;@ $ p" {S} C€ I w� r � 1 � I i
k f @ Y { i e ..:skit t£_ i . - C' 1k., �da i£ tP @i�
T

tWTz2-<o
L� S•."' 7 I Y[ I II ,� f - :. I 3�3 f n'
* Division of Soil and •Water, COILSCrVat1011 Operation Review, 3 i, E e
y 3 �: of Soil an
44 �d.Watei �Canseiryahon CompLance Inspection
�Division
i<vision of Water Quality Compliance Inspechoti t , `i ' i , 3. x 4 t` r
s
[3Other Agency Operation Review' ..'
jorRoutine O Complaint -_ O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
.11.11 - ��I I IIPI�l1
Facility Number Date of Inspection H�9
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ertified ©Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
b= - Mc-l.A Awn ' .............. ° . r S • - V �.f
Farm Name: .....................................................^'`'',................................. County. —� �.
Owner Name ��� ��� i S�' Phone No:
1
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title Phone No:
FlailingAddress:...................................................................... ................................................................................................ .................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..... M.h,a La.3 p e,^I..................................................
Certified Operator: .......... I ............... .. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
..................................................................................................
Latitude �� �` �_�•� Longitude C�• �� ���
Design Current "'i �� `� ` ; : Design Ctarrent, DesignCdrient lr
Swine' 31 j Ca achy Po utahon Poultry" Ca achy • Po' utatiori Cattle Capacity . Po elation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
f
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total DCSI
El Gilts,
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
gn Capacity
F.
Total SSLW
Discharges & Stream In_ packs
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray.Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If' yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? J t8pillway
[]Yes ❑"No
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes 0"No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VN
Yes
❑ Yes � No
Structure f Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -1?
Freeboard(inches): ..................................................................................................................... .. ....................._..........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [JNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — b-5' 1 Date of Inspection 9 r3a -Qi q=Aa"`
f J��,.S L,q►JCrfl��
C .GinnoOA, 4q`J
S. Gg,qlw CS Sa /L.d jo-,� T
4/';n/97

.Faci{ity Number: Sj — 6 S Date of Inspection Oo
Odor Issues —/
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below , 2 es o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? {{{���
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ZNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Z No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes PING
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes XNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes *Nco
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes _❑ No
3/23/99

�_-(�`D�vrsion of Soil and Water ConservaEron Operation Review rt 3,��� "z
it f ^•,� 'u'�.ta.ov."*+rs 3.iF' +' '�-
•t DttvrstonrofSoil and Water:Conservation Compleance Inspection �f
�Y".n�.s" 0 cat a tiaE °a:s � xa [ st,gv
K DivislO1 of Water Quality Compl,aince nspechon
zf
"kf
i � Other:A enC ' � O era tOn ReVIeW t
:�`�..7,4e
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
��—
Facility Number
Date of Inspection i
� � � �-�- - -� �
Time of Inspection ',OU J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [j Registered 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm N`ame:..........hac 4m .............................. .... ... County. ..............................
OwnerName: ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...'Title ................................................ Phone No:...................................................
.......................
.Mailing Address:................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
..
Onsite Representative:.... Q. N..............E--- .tS.�.r!.. .vJ.!�... Integrator:.... p �/..................`�...................................... �f
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =r=1 =11
Design - Current
Swine Capacity Po
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
J
❑ Farrow to Wean
[]Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
A.
Longitude �• �° �•
Design Current Design 'Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I IM Non -Dairy t
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons,;,".` ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
f
Holding Ponds / Sohd Traps ; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
,.� rrwMrw�rrw..w�rrw�iourrrriw i nninw°nrr��r �
Discharges & Stream Iml)acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NO
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yesa
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 1 i is
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �ZNc
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Q'No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier: {{ Freeboard fjnches—7
). ......L! / .......................................I...................... .............................
..................................................................................................... ....
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion, El Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Cordrued on bark

t� ility Number: — l� Dote of, Irrspr,•ctiorr
+'r 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed throu-h a waste managerncnt or
closure plan? ❑ Yes /No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Write Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Fxcessivc Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes dNo
12. Crop type c, /tz, r—y —L
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes PIVo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acrea+UC for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ,KNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Q�o
Required Records_& Document_ti
/
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Vi14
18.
Does the facility fail to have al; components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily availahle?
y
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps, crc_y
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri ion, frechoard. waste �sis & soil Samplc reports)
❑ Yes
11(10
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
Cl Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
Oc/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
[j No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
DNo
24.
Does fae.ility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PrNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the; Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
i
Q No
0: Rio yiolawiis:oi- iieiciencies •"°ere noted• during this:visit: • Yo' 6 will r, eoeiye t 6 furthetr : l
6rres• onde i ' e. about this visit. ... . ... ' • .
Comments (refer.to:question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional: pages .as necessary): .
V
er/inspector Name
rflnspector Signature: Date:

lity Number: — % Date ul' Inspection ')
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'!
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) nuted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentftcmporary cower'!
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9(No
❑ Yes ['No
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes INO
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments an orDrawings: ''-
3/23/99
3/23/99

(1 /3/98' *4a- :t.
Routine O C
Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Mivision of Water Quality
of
of DSWC review O Other
Date of InspectionI l �3�381
Facility Numbers
�/ Time of Inspection m 24 hr. (hh:m)
S 13 Registered ertilied [3 Applied
j{1. for
, Permit 13 Permitted 0 Not Opera tiartal Date Last Operated:
FaFarmNarrEc:.... i?�SY.. ..... .� 1�....... Y...................... Cpunty:...... @h!............................................
j • �� -q -
Owner Name:...�.�I,.......!�tL).......5�.14....C..f+!�,�................... Phone No:..( ...................... `1.......
Facility Contact: 15.aC3.ri......... .�.... L.... Cl....... Title: ........................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ...... IU...I� 7.......El a' � ..`'tk.....�-"..:....................... 5 .... Q.Cn.........:;mp.. f............
Onsite Re resentative:...' Y) Integrator: 7 �'`
p doh r1 K La.w do .MU.�:.�.�I ....aml.�... airm.. s
I.,..�. . Operator Certification Number Certified Operator�....�1 Fn...� ��.ng��.i. .... ........... p ..:................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' 4 44 Longitude • 6 61
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Clio
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ((Yes Q Ko
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [,Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes
❑ Yes
✓„M N -
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes { io
❑ Yes ile <O
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ®'No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 9 Noo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes
7/25/97
0
'o

Facility Number: s —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yeso
Structuresa on o din Ponds. lus 11 e c
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure i Structure 2
Identifier:„
..........................
freeboard (ft):...... ...11
Structure 3 Structure 4
..................................................................
❑ Yes ljd'1Vo
Structure 5 - Structure G
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? f ��d � eyes' ft o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed. ❑ Yes jj!}<o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? �� .�-��) ❑ Yes U<o
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 8'No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes U400
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
' d -...cyl a"
15. Crop type �. ..... ......... CL ....................... ......... ..r.�l' Q. ...� Q1 �ii!1...� { ...................................
16. Do the receivingcrops differ with those designated in the Animal ste Mana ement Plan AWMP ? ❑ Yes L9'l�o
P g g ( )
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑Xb
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑K
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
,,_�o
t�l.ara
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Q No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
Eg<o
For Certified -or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
B-go
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
El Yes
,E'l�lo
L�f O
[]• No:violations-or deficiencies:we're-noted-du' ring this:visit: Youmilf receive�no.f1trtlier,:
: . cotresponciebce about �this:visit:• " :. ..:. : .: .: . ::.: .. . :: - ..
. .
5��c #gUwrAj V#d 01� 44t , -Aot i�i�
a, J fct,Ut,1 nG 2r � ,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: K4UQ,,�& M - tU_PKa( 1 Date:

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DW 1 inspection
Facility Number
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
flow -up of DS«'C review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Tinie of Inspection ' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...............................................................................................
Farm Name: /.�... ,f�, �/] l County:............................... .......................
17 1....................P...l.................1.'..I.. (i..h.%3.1� j..�...................... �r
OwnerName ................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ............................... ........ Title: .. Phone No:
MailingAddress:..................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:.. -AICF. L IU.,, ../...4-.. Integrator:.... . 1' .......................................................................... ..
Certified Operator: .................................... Operator Certification Number:..
Location of Farm:
Latitude • ' 0 Longitude • 4
Type of Operation
Swine.
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Ej Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Halding Ponds'' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Di.�;charge ori;.inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/rain?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system" (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste mana,ement system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/3 S)/47 maintenance/intl}roverrment?
❑ Yes Q"No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
Cl Yes
wNo
f
e No
Continued
on hack

Facitity umber: r
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures {Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes f �] No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft);.'.....r,.•............................................. ................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ] No
1 t. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes . �] No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
i
15. Crop type �. .................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0- No.violations-or deficiencies. rvere-noted-during this:visit.- :You;w'ill re'ceive-no•furiher,
e6er6p6rtden6e about this. isit:- :. : ; : :
P. /Zewt/eLC A 140
,USGs 140
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes [�No
............ I ...................
❑ Yes E2 No
❑ Yes [rNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes )�J'No
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes [XNo
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 3

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
rl ©'.D Sion of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
[vision of WaterQuality:=Co►npliancc-Lnspection'
(3 Other Agency -' Operation, Review
12�outinv Q Complaint O Follow-up of MVQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number S Date of Inspection
Lj Time of Inspection i1i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
©.Permitted dCertified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operational I i4at'll'a's"t Operated:
Farm N;une: ........ Cottntv:. ?! a^ ...........................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Plione No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................ride:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Rep resentative:.xJb.(J4..... LAJOZe.d....................................................... lntegrator:.,... �'it�i¢ �"��'....��.-..........................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude r �� ��° Longitude 0 • ��°�
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
(�p�
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gillis
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer_..__. ...,.,__ ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I J❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1I0 Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed, whist is the estimated flow in calhnin?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
fdenlifier:
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
❑ Yes PNo
El Yes Xl
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes
Ff No
❑ Yes
ZINo
❑ Yes
PINo
❑ Yes,,E�No
Structure G
Freehoard (inches)
1/6/99 Continued on back

Eacility;Number: 'S Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [] Yes VNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes [�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑.Yes 2(No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ( "No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum r
liquid level elevation markings? [:]Yes INO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvcnienl? ❑ Yes ;?(No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen El Yes J;�No
12. Crop type ............... ............... ............................ ....................................:........... ..........................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ;2(No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes 'WNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
ONo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
Required
Records & Document~
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
(2 No
18.
Does the facility bail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
7rNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
.fNo
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ONo
ZNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
[:]Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes E�No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes � o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �j No
XD'vioiations.ar' dei idtn' des.were noted. during.this:visit..I'.ou wilI.retceive nc'r further . .
b6rrespondehee' about; this visit.;
Use mentsi s n Y } P n any YES answers and/or any,'recomtnendations or any other comments '' i : ', 3 1� M
Comments (refer:. to question # . Explain
g of facia to better ex lain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): k,
ISM y LoT"s gcd 97i r Pao R---L'4 i "_VC-L� 1�a�� a,aU-s r3 ,� w T I�PPt-� f�.D aV
Reviewer/inspector Name
cS 1 I— 4f �D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ /2a /-- 4. !1&1 �,,,�`f Date: �?Z( EVV 1 11/6/99

Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection E� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
egislered 0 Certified © Applied for/Permit 13 Permitted 0 Not O crational Date Last Operated;,,,,,,,,,,,,,
.Farm Name:....... GeV �7.�.......1.: �.5-.`�r,w1�'.......I..R.!!:I!~............................ Cottnty:.....•....Ja.!t�V4�??^�
V'•.................... I .... .......... .............
Owner Name: .......... L. LY...... K...'a. v!�.......�n�- �qt 14............
r �
Facility Contact:. .......... ..... Tit1e:........ P..l!!4!`•
Phone No: V'y .... .............
.......•.......... Phone No:. ..........
Mailing Address: ....... C�. '!..Z............ fp• ! "r.......he ...................... I...... ......./-?eNsi!!
Onsite Representative: .......... 16�/.. M�f:.....Akk:'�? Integrator: ................ p.�. .. ........ ...... ......µ ~ ....................................
Certified Operator .......... jr.11N................. 4--sido—j............................................... Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
.tal.. 3.5r .............. .......A4.. P.t.L........Q f ra' !1t!✓... 141:.:W /34?w
Latitude ' 4 « Longitude • G 'k
•r'Design
k
Current
u Design Current � Design^� ' Currenti
Swute
Capacity; Population
b
}: Poultry „ _ ,CapacityPopulation X Cattle Capacity .PopuiatioQ�� i
F ..
❑Layer# ❑Dairy��'
WeanEto Feeder
❑ FeedFinish
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non Dairy
as
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Totai Design-, ApAdty.',,
E
❑ Gilts
�-
s> TotalSSLW`�`a =F
1 . q
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons'/ Holding Ponds �
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
i
Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
' �
:
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System.
_ p
'.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d• Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125I97
❑ Yes j
❑ Yes L� <0
❑ Yes [3-N-No
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes l!I No
❑ Yes No
2Yes 0"N
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes L'1 IVo
Continued opt back

Facility Number:l — �r
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? _
❑ Yes
Er -No
Structures La oons loldin� Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
0 No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft.):........h:.O..............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
13No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�1a
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
21'0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Flo
Waste Application
/
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
@- O
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)'
15. Crop r'
type ......L::, .......................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No1y
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
,❑,,,,,,
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
BVo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[240
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
[Oio
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�o
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No. -viol kions:orde c' iencies4e're,noted-duringthis:visit..You�W'ili receive' ito'ftirihei•-:'
Orrespo6debice atiout-this'.visit . • '. . .
.S Mt, b{ Cr Yt a bN� o /- IA S !
h045"A7 KNie'r A09 hamx&_,
o roww�
z 3 4
Lrt7�✓ ! Sc�c�iny gfDuMd
Wa,ST� 1I rS IW� p��ow;,v9
-(rQMQ U"- '61V
a.,y 0 hem 6kfi
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��,/ Date.

J.L-14-1995 15: 2b FROM DEri WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
PRO P.02i02
Site Requires Immediate Attendnr-
Facility No. /-6-2
DrVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS S£I'E VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time:
farm Name/Owner r 7'v� A � X57 -Q
Mailing Address: _ 3`0, apt r %t3 w "i k111
County: c -"
Integrator J, If a Phone: _ q N f zli
On Site Representative: ,�.. A C/a t - _ _ Phone:
Physical Addz+esslLocadon:. QrP- r r 1= as L MsL, �c an y .So_ G, LS _ ; ny s'au J 4
of 1 "Y-f �S•r[ ld0l fTf '} n ��� �i�5'. [li ecn2n "C�
Type of Operation: Swine A/-, Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: f'o _ _ Number of Animals on Site: LA #1 -wi
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW�-
Latitude: Longitude: - Elevation-
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Was[c Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storru event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 9or No Actual Freeboard: Wit..________. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Tr Was any erosion observed? Yes or(9
Is adequate land available for spray? (ge or No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? "Feet from DweIiings? ' or No
100 Feet from Wells? 9 or No
.e ararnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
x mal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Line'? Yes arg
anima] waste discharged into waters of the state b�y�man-m-kdc[editch , flu -bins system, or[other /
'� 1 r / a 5�LJ/�5,P]s ej�'CpFti �s .L"/Alrj� aI- �af'ccn flP lil'!°
-;iTni,a_ man :made de«ces. Yes o eau Ex atn.
-..N,cs tits vacuity rummcain adequate waste mwiagernent records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on spccifie acreage with cover crop)'? Yes or No G h ff ►tr-& -7
Additional Comments: TA Iy a� �' Al 57f/ r I'l/I l .SJd �.I`y9�d rq 1i i
/I ,roc r.re 16 �•� 1 _Sk' z�i�°S . r -
siglaamryf
cc: Facility Assesstteent Unit
Use Attachments if Needed..
TOTPL P.a2

ROY COOPER
Governor
WILLIAM
Environmental ��iauol,$,aay6lale �'N3© NA tr ROSSetaR.
Quality
�. ,
January 12, 2017
�7:'
Faye McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm.,,,,
6812 Elevation Road
Benson, NC 27504
Subject; Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Faye McLamb:
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on
December 29, 2016. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey
requirement for the lagoons at Barber McLamb Farm facility. Due to the amount of treatment
volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31,
2020,
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at this facility should be performed before December 31,
2020.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
'A.0, -
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File AWS510065
-�5>-Nothing Compares''
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

CCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Faye McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Road
Benson, NC 27504
Dear Faye McLamb:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
September 20, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on September
7, 2012. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon at Barber McLamb Farm facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume
available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2016,
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at this facility should be performed before December 31,
2016. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh-Regiorial4'ffice,"AgiiferProteetion°Secfia
Permit File AWS510065
John Langdon, 7728 Raleigh Rd., Benson, NC 27504
AWFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.orn
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One.:...
No thCarohna
atural

4�.
KDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beveriy Eaves Perdue
Governor
Ms. Faye McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson, NC 27504
Dear Ms. McLarnb:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
January 14, 2010
Dee i=reennan
Secretary
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on November
23, 2009. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon at the Barber McLamb Faun. Due to the amount of treatment volume available,
the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2012.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at Barber McLamb Farm should be performed before
December 31, 2012. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at (919) 715-
6627 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Christine D. Blanton
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS510065
16K Mail Service Center, Raleia;`!. Nord Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capita! Rlvd., Raleiah. North 0aroilna 2701=
?non: 919-73:'-3221 1 FAK 91�j-71;rC553 tCustomer Service: 1-877-623-674fi
iia.rn=t wtav+,nrwatpmiialirvnra
NorffiCw-ol.ina
atraralfy
n 7u21 flnnanr nhs 1 Ain, niaiiv� r�Ctl On mninve-

.1 f
o�pF WA�F9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
� y
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 24, 2007
Fay McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 elevation Rd
Benson, NC 27504
,1
.BAN 2 5 2001 1
I DUIR RALUGH REGIONAL OFFiCF
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Fay McLamb:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on January
23, 2007. With the survey results, Mr. John Langdon requested an extension of the sludge
survey requirement for the lagoon at the Barber McLamb Farm facility not to be required until
2009. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge
survey is not needed until 2009. The results of the 2009 sludge survey are to be submitted by
March 1, 2010. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please
call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
7440w-�
Miressa D. Garoma
Soil Scientist
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Central Files
John M Langdon
No thCarolina
;V turr ;
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.newaternualitv.ora Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

December 23,2006
Dear Sir,
This letter is in reference to the Notice of Violation we received (NOV-2006-PC-0545
and NOV-2006-PC-0540). On inspection two violations were found. The first concerned
the recording of rainfall daily. This past summer was quite dry and I personalty started a
new job, both of which got me out of the habit of recording rainfall.. Please see attached
a form where I am recording precipitation daily.
The other violation was the lack of a sludge survey for the Creech and Barber farms.
Please see attached a copy of the surveys.
Please contact us if any other problems or concerns come up. Our phone numbers are
(919)- 796-5010, and (919)-894-3039.
Thank -you.
Sincerely, r�
John & Eileen Langdon
IOEG 282006
(01,CiGH REGIONAL OFFICE i

Rainman Environmental,
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
910.271.0460
Dr�j]I
Jj 4
LLC
DFr ? 8 ?006 J "
t DINp RA�tIG}1 REGlOfdAl OFFICE
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
John Lan don - Barber Farm
Date of Field Calibration
12/14/2006
Flow Meter Serial Number
M051313902
Equipment Number
Solid Set Zone 1
Number of Sprinklers
5
Is ring size within 0.01" of original
manufactured size?
x—Yes or No. If "no," replace
ring.
Pressure Gause Readinus:
At Pump
Psi
At Traveler
if applicable)
At Sprinkler/Gun
Psi
Expected Flow Rate {from manufacturers
GPM
chart
Measure FIow Rate from flow meter)
62.5 GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 10%?
Yes or x No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
Ft.
wetted acreage determination)
Measured Wetted Diameter
114 Ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15%
Yes or x_No. If "yes," then
and/or measured flow variance greater than
contact a technical specialist or irrigation
10%
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.
Explanation of Findings:
Calibrator's Signature:
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form 8-15-03
Retention Period: 3 Years
Original 2
5l-- bs

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
910.271.0460
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
John Lan don - Barber Farm
Date of Field Calibration
12/14/2006
Flow Meter Serial Number
M051313902
Equipment Number
Solid Set Zone 2
Number of Sprinklers
7
Is ring size within 0.01" of original
manufactured size?
x_Yes or No. If "no," replace
ring,
Pressure Gauge Readings:
At Pump
Psi
At Traveler
(if applicable)
At Sprinkler/Gun
Psi
Expected Flow Rate (from manufacturers
GPM
chart)
Measure Flow Rate from flow meter
87.5 GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 10%?
Yes or x No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
Ft.
wetted acreage determination
Measured Wetted Diameter
112 Ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15%
Yes or x_No. If "yes," then
and/or measured flow variance greater than
contact a technical specialist or irrigation
10%
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.
Explanation of Findings:
Calibrator's Signature:
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form 8-15-03
Retention Period: 3 Years Original 2

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
910.271.0460
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
John Lan don - Barber Farm
Date of Field Calibration
12/14/2006
Flow Meter Serial Number
M051313902
Equipment Number
Solid Set Zone 3
Number of Sprinklers
7
Is ring size within 0.01" of original
manufactured size?
x_Yes or No. If "no," replace
ring.
Pressure Gauve Readinas:
At Pump
Psi
At Traveler
(if applicable)
At Sprinkler/Gun
Psi
Expected Flow Rate (from manufacturers
GPM
chart)
Measure Flow Rate from flow meter
87.5 GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 10%?
Yes or x No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
Ft.
wetted acreage determination)
Measured Wetted Diameter
112 Ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15%
Yes or x_No. If "yes," then
and/or measured flow variance greater than
contact a technical specialist or irrigation
10%
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.
Explanation of Findings:
Calibrator's Signature:.
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form 8-15-03
Retention Period: 3 Years Original 2

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
910.271.0460
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
John Lan don — Barber Farm
Date of Field Calibration
12/14/2006
Flow Meter Serial Number
M051313902
Equipment Number
Solid Set Zone 4
Number of Sprinklers
6
Is ring size within 0.01" of original
manufactured size?
x—Yes or No. If "no," replace
ring.
Pressure Gauge Readings:
At Pump
Psi
At Traveler
(if a Iicable)
At Sprinkler/Gun
Psi
Expected Flow Rate (from manufacturers
GPM
chart
Measure Flow Rate from flow meter
75 GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 10%?
Yes or x No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
Ft.
wetted acreage determination)
Measured Wetted Diameter
114 Ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15%
Yes or x_No. If "yes," then
and/or measured flow variance greater than
contact a technical specialist or irrigation
10%
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.
Explanation of Findings:
Calibrator's Signature: �ll,L_(,LL. jL �L ��—�"
� y
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Farm 8-15-03
Retention Period: 3 Years Original 2

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
910.271.0460
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
John Lan don — Barber Farm
Date of Field Calibration
12/14/2006
Flow Meter Serial Number
M051313902
Equipment Number
Solid Set Zone 5
Number of S rinklers
5
Is ring size within 0.01" of original
manufactured size?
x_Yes or No. If "no," replace
ring.
Pressure Gauae Readinas:
At Pump
Psi
At Traveler
(if applicable)
At Sprinkler/Gun
Psi
Expected Flow Rate (from manufacturers
GPM
chart
Measure Flow Rate from flow meter
62.5 GPM
Flow rate variance Eeater than 10%?
Yes or x No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
Ft.
wetted acreage determination)
Measured Wetted Diameter
114 Ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15%
Yes or x_No. If "yes," then
and/or measured flow variance greater than
contact a technical specialist or irrigation
10%
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.
Explanation of Findings:
Calibrator's Signature: �Jnd k-,�l C�...�
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form 8-15-03
Retention Period: 3 Years Original 2

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
910.271.0460
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
John Lan don - Barber Farm
Date of Field Calibration
12/14/2006
Flow Meter Serial Number
M051313902
Equipment Number
Solid Set Zone 6
Number of Sprinklers
4
Is ring size within 0.01" of original
manufactured size?
x_Yes or No. If "no," replace
ring.
Pressure Gauee Readings:
At Pump
Psi
At Traveler
(if applicable)
At Sprinkler/Gun
Psi
Expected Flow Rate (from manufacturers
GPM
chart)
Measure Flow Rate (from flow meter)
50 GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 10%?
Yes or x No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
Ft.
wetted acreage determination
Measured Wetted Diameter
114 Ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15%
Yes or x_No. If "yes," then
and/or measured flow variance greater than
contact a technical specialist or irrigation
10%
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.
Explanation of Findings:
Calibrator's Signature:
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form 8-15-03
Retention Period: 3 Years Original 2

1
December 23,2006
Dear Sir,
This letter is in reference to the Notice of Violation we received (NOV-2006-PC-0545
and NOV-2006-PC-0540). On inspection two violations were found. The first concerned
the recording of rainfall daily. This past summer was quite dry and I personally started a
new job, both of which got me out of the habit of recording rainfall.. Please see attached
a form where I am recording precipitation daily.
The other violation was the lack of a sludge survey for the Creech and Barber farms.
Please see attached a copy of the surveys.
Please contact us if any other problems or concerns come up. Our phone numbers are
(919)- 796-5010, and (919)-894-3039.
Thank -you.
Sincerely,
John & Eileen Langdon
6,--t s /fG I;, !) G,
� �-c.• crt J�
fii t/ S
DEC 2820W �k f
i
E'; ',,-is RAI F3GH !;EGIONAL Orf 10F J

C `l,J A-T = y 4. oo
57o? = 412. Z (Mv)
i
r

earl",
Alrhendi.r 2. ,Slrrdgo Survey Data Sheet*
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Completed by: .J 0 L r M
Print Name - /Signature
Lagoon Identification:
._J—_�13J
Date: 11 — / 6 - D or
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of sludge
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom sot[
(C) minus (B)
Thickness of sludge
la jer
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
3
7
- -5 —
—
�+'� -
�e
6
7
$
)3.
9
_ 10
11
12
13
14-
15_
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
*,,ill Gr•irl l,oirrrs airrl crn7.esor rdinLy slud3z e la'er thicknesses mull he shown on a sketch attached to ibis
Sludge Srrr c�l)atn Street.
iwy rinchestolemhsgfafirol.
Tr -
15

�!� �� a�� s��'
C��
��. � S �
� titer

Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
1 / •
A. Farm Permit or D W Q Identification Number
B. Lagoon Identification 16 le _LK 1 0 1,
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements _ a �,,. Yvl . L o, ^ !o ao ^
D. Date of Measurements
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil, of the lagoon:
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
"Ia
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 0 � 6 (acres)
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampli�$_pQints:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8poi�n s
b. If more than 1.33 acres, acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24,
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the intersection points an the lagoon grid so that data
recorded at each can be easily matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (Appendix 2).
I. At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level /
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): —It h
�� J. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level zirl
(4q y� ___(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records):
K. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level�tE �'r '-'•�,r x 3
(Item J minus Item I, assuming the present liquid level is below the Maximum Liquid Level): ,fie
L. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level U
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): I i
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M minus Item K):"
7 � a ew 6 (Note: If Item b is less than 4 feet, a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N.C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to the Sludge Volume Worksheet if yo desire to calculate sludge volume for a rectangular -
shaped lagoon with uniform side slopes.
Completed by: jtfyr M . LA A j LDate: I
Print Name ig atu
14

FORM FRB-1
nEt, 2 8 299B
Farm Owner
Operator
Waste Structure• qo!5� and and Daily Precipitation Record
Facility Number
_"WasteStructure
Freeboard
r■rs����r
I. Lagoon freeboard is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon embankment and the level of liquid.
For lagoons with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should be recorded.
2. Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded at least weekly.
3, Rainfall must be recorded for every rain event. 3/14/2003

WAr, 99
r
-i
O '<
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
November 29, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7006 0810 0002 6049 0070
Mr. John Langdon
Barber McLamb Farm
7728 Raleigh Rd.
Benson, NC 27504
RE; Notice of Violation (NOV-2006-PC-0540)
Barber McLamb Farm
Facility No. 51-65
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Langdon:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On November 27, 2006 our office conducted an annual compliance inspection of your facility 51-65
in Johnston County to verify that (1) the facility has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the facility is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15A NCAC 2T.1300; (3)
the farm's waste management structures are being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion,
and/or runoff. Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review.
The said facility was found to be managed in accordance with its waste utilization plan, and the
associated spray fields were also found to be in good shape. However, the following violations were noted
during the inspection:
• In accordance with Condition III, Item 3 of your General Permit, precipitation events at facilities
issued with a Certificate of Coverage (COC) to operate under the General Permit shall be
monitored and recorded. The precipitation type and amount shall be recorded daily for all
precipitation events and maintained on site for Department review. There were no rainfall records
for the year 2006 available for review except for the months of July and November.
In accordance with Condition III, Item 19 of your General Permit, all facilities that are issued a
COC to operate under the General Permit shall conduct a survey of the sludge accumulation in all
lagoons within two (2) years of receiving the COC and every year thereafter. Our records indicate
that you were reminded by Mr. John Hunt during a previous inspection conducted on July 5, 2006
that the sludge survey was due by October 1, 2006. No sludge survey report was available for
review during this latest inspection.
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
Npne
r hCaro
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 atura�
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: http,Rwww.ncwaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

Cont. Page Two
November 29, 2006
Barber McLamb Farm
Facility # 51-65
Required Action:
The Permittee shall provide to this office within thirty (30) days from receipt of this violation
notice, a written explanation and a plan that will ensure that the problem does not recur. Your
explanation will be reviewed, and be advised that if this violation continues, the Division will
send recommendation to the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the appropriate
enforcement action.
• Please complete the sludge survey and calibration of your irrigation equipment, and submit
copies of the reports to the address below by December 31, 2006:
Joseph Gyamfi
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that the aforementioned
violation(s) and/or deficiencies and any other problems that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. In
addition, please review the comments noted in the summary section of the report, and address any other
concerns or issues discussed.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 919-791-4232 or Joseph Gyamfi at 919-7914231.
Sincerely,
WS.Z4'merman, L.G.
Cc: Johnston County SWCD Office
SWCD-RRO
Aquifer Protection Animal Central Files
RRO Compliance Animal Files
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Fay & David McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Fay & David McLamb:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 5, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Fay &
David McLamb, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510065 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Barber McLamb Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 543 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section --Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o,enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H ,0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity -permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days.prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
U
for AIan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510065
APS Central Files

w A
Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� 9
Q.
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
o 0
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Vp
j [
~
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
o �c
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Fay & David McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Fay & David McLamb:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
- Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 5, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Fay &
David McLamb, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510065 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Barber McLamb Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 543 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to Iand as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federaI), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.,
N17MR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
1 An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This,COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting. the staff member listed below for information on this
Process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
" _ __.--Quality-Staff may be Peached at (919) 5714700. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510065
NDPU Files

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Barber McLamb Farm
David McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd.
SmW4fwH, NC 27504
�ent5o�
04-07-2003
This plan has been developed
Edward Humphrey
NRCS
806 North Street
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156 x. 3
C:,
o
�
i
0 1�
03
Developer Signature
n
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
C q, q
ignature (owner) Date
- 3
Signature (man a r or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service �ndard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Consep�ation Con9mrssion. l
Plan Approved By:
ignature
Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 503,361 gals/year by
a 543 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1159
Incorporated
1991
Injected
2193
Irrigated
1260
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
1,507.00
601,957
-98,596
• -- ------------ --•----- -- -- ------- - - ---- ------ --- ---- ---
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 Source Page 1 of I

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crons Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2849
1
NIA
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
*1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*6.0 Tons
28501
UN2
NIA
Varina
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*5.5 Tons
4056
1
NIA
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
*1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*6.0 Tons
4056
3
NIA
Varina
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*5.5 Tons
Li
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 PCS Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

a
The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
6.81
13.61
20.42
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
3.40
6.81
10.21
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
6.39
12.76
19.15
------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
1 Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
{1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs1A
1000
gal1A
tons
1000 gals
tons
2849
1
S7
Gilead
1.00
1.00
Small Grain Oversee-
*1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
19.97
0.00
2849
1
S7
Gilead
1.00
1.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0
119.83
0.00
2850
UN2
S7
Varina
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
35.95
0.00
2850
UN2
S7
Varina
1.80
1.80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*5.5 Tons
3I1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
109.85
0
197.72
0.00
4056
1
S7
Gilead
1.17
1.17
1 Small Grain Overseed
*1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
23.37
0.00
4056
1
S7
Gilead
L 17
1.17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0
140.20
0.00
4056
3
57
Varina
0.50
0.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
9.99
0.00
4056
3
S7
Varina
0.50
0.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
1 *275
0
D
Inig.
1 275
109.85
0
54.92
0.00
--------------------------------------------- -- - -- - - - ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------.
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/7/03 WUT PaRe 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gaVA
tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
601.96
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
503.36
Balance, 1000 gallons
-98.60
L
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol — means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
------------------------------------------ -------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ -- ------------------------------- - -----
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/7/03 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that maybe applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inchesmour)
Application Amount
(inches)
2849
1
Gilead
0.35
1.00
2850
UN2
Varina
0.50
0.96
4055
1 1
1 Gilead
0.35
1.00
4056
3
1 Varina
0.50
0.96
----- - -- ----------- _-- _
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 IAF Page 1 of I

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Stora2e CaDacitv
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Stora a Capacity (Days)
Start Date
09/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
70
1
2
55
1
3
71
1
4
97
1
5
140
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
159
1
11
142
1
12
121
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The'remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, UN2
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced l' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, UN2
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and. July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- --•----------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-07-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
-------------------------------------------------------- - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/7/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
- --- - -- -------------------- ------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/7/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 417103 Specification Pale 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
707495 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/7103 Specification Page 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
kTI.Mx;VJ
Ir
NCDENR.
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OIL
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL ResoURCEs
Division of Water Quality
July 31, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. John Langdon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, North Carolina 27504
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Barber McLamb Farm
Facility #51-65'
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Langdon:
on, July 24, 2001, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations. As a result of the
inspection, the following.deficiency was observed:
The animal waste permit issued 11/6/00 includes several
conditions that must be met:
A protective vegetative cover shall be established
and maintained on all lagoon embankments... Lagoon
areas shall be accessible and vegetation shall be
kept mowed.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer papa

John Langdon; NOD
Page Two; July 31,.2001
Additionally, a discharge from the hog house was
observed on the day of the inspection. Repairs should be
implemented immediately to cease any uncontained flow of
animal waste from this structure. The discharge did not
reach waters of the state and appeared to be limited within
the property boundaries of this farm.
Please respond within fifteen (15) days of receipt
of this notification to indicate the practices that will
be implemented to address the deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call at (919) 571--4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
enc.
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Murphy Family Farms, Inc.
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

I
r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Attn: David McLamb
Dear David McLamb:
�'1t11i 41 � E
UF.HNR R,ALFIGH REGIOi4AL OFFICE
November 6, 2000
A 4 0 0
i
D E
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
IRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your application received on February 1, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Fay & David McLamb, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Barber McLamb Farm, located in Johnston County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 600 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified- design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16I7 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5091b recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510065
Barber McLamb Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Since ,
4 2�
ti
-/,Kerr T. Stevens
CC" (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
SRID
M 2 7 Pno) '
Div ou 'r uh l cri wUALITY
CENTRAL FILES

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Fay & David McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Dear Fay & David McLamb:
4 0 •
Ad
20fidubodw ���
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT-AND.NATURAL RESOURCES
1 r
December 30, 1999 ! + r
uF14M RALEIGH RELIC.N.Ir_ OFFICE'
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 51��65
'Jt hnston,Gounty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere] ,
t
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 1, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Fay & David McLamb
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Farm Number: j1 :653
Dear Fay & David McLamb:
/ • 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
CIO
You are hereby notified that Barber McLamb Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application, must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone] extension 364 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number _51-
Farm Name: VAeA3�& ►`^�L.�4�"�
On -Site Representative:�h,jq 4 4,1c azi:j
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: rJ���'
Operation is flagged fora wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
peration not required to secure WA
determination at th' time based on
Date of site visit: exemption E1 E3. E4
Date of most recent W P: n $ Annual farm PAN deficit:' 1Z-7 pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.) .
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II ­F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part I11).
PART IL 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999L
Facility Number
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'-'
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS)
FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant. pull. zone. or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers dependina on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

FACILITY NUMBER ,S:f -'J�S REVIEWER:
FARM NAME: A!r-a4-P-- c-DATE: 3'
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON -PAN
POND -PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGNNOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation.-
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation:
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume W
Temporary storage volume W
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi):
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr):
Nozzle/Ring Size(s)-
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design .
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
ft. 1 st 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft2"d 25 yr.124 hr. storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard in.
ft.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Exceeds required volume?,
Exceeds required volume?.
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
.. 5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

n
CAWMP Components-
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date: 5l'-/7C
Waste Utilization Plan; Date: /�
c Amount of plant available nitrogen prdduced/used annually ( 1.3 ibs)
Dominant soil series:
l Crops to be grown: c. QM2�w.Q , rM _ GIAk�j
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= )
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1 /93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Type of irrigation: Traveling Gun I'd-S Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2196 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1/96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21 /96)
REQ RED RECORDS effective 9/1/96 PERMITTED FACILITIES
Waste application records (IRR 1 &2) General Permit & COC on site
Annual soil sample reports for 1999 weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index: )
(Zn index.- )
Waste analysis - date last taken 2 °
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for strqct6r'd #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
oft M006000mmaf
NCDENR
NoRTH CARouNA DmPAPrrMENT oR
EwiRONmmw ^No NowuR^L Rr5cuRcr5
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 10, 1997
Mr. -David McLamb
6812 Elevation Road
Benson, North Carolina 27504
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 51-65
Barber McLamb Swine Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. McLamb:
On October 13, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State. However, as a
result of the inspection, the following deficiency was observed:
The facility has a small leak at the solids collectors at the end
of the house. The waste does not flow away from the house but is
trapped in a low lying area beside the solids collectors.
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an overflow. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days of
receipt. You should include in your response the actions that you
will take to address these deficiencies.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. David McLamb
December 10, 1997
Page Two
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation. If you
have any questions regarding this inspection please call Mr.
Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Si
ncerely,
Schus , P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Kenneth York, Johnston County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
RRO Files
Mr. John Langdon, lessee
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Ms. Faye B. McLamb
6812 Elevation Rd.
Benson, NC 27504
A��
�EHNR
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 7, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary
Barber/McLamb Farm Facility No. 51-65
Johnson County
Dear Ms. McLamb,
On July 1, an Operation Review was conducted of Barber/McLamb Farm, facility no. 51-65. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G. S. I43-215.101), was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations
during the 1997'calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
It was determined that no corrective actions are necessary as the result of this Review, since waste was not being
discharged to the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were
maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information.
The review determined that the farm was operating in accordance with the approved animal waste management
plan. Please remember that you are required to obtain either an amendment to your existing plan or a new waste utilization
plan before any changes are made in crop type or harvest method on land included in your plan. All land used for nutrient
application from animal waste systems must be included in the waste utilization plan. The plan must be certified by either
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office,
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please do
not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Margaret O'cefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: John Langdon, Farm Manager
Johnson Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, AW FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%f C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secreto
A. Preston Howar
'r I
Fay & David M b APR W 7 1997
Barber McLamb Ea
6812 Elevation a �!„)"!' REGIONAL OFFICE
Benson NC 27
Dear Mr. McLamb:
[D.F-=HNF;Z
iSAp�1, 1997
3e
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Barber McLamb F
Facility Number 51- 15
Johnston County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535. Ni;cAn
�%FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]== 1 50% recycles/100/o post -consumer paper

fl t
State of North Carolina ;. r
,r
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the
information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by
the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Barher McLamb Farm
1.2 P¢ lit Land Owner's name: Fay & David McLamb
1.3 Mailing address: 6812 Elevation Rd
City, State: Benson NC Zip: 27504
Telephone Number (include area code): 894-4632
1.4 County where facility is located: J
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): I40 to NC 210 turn right go 0.7 miles then turn right on SR
1330. go I mile to farm on right_ FA rpm 5m, 1e_j v., IVC !n
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): John Langdon, 7728 Raleigh Rd. Benson NC 27504
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): John Langdon Murphy Family Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/78
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 51 (county number); 65 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish .
543- Certified Design Capacity / .5 7"�'r- 6d A be -Ai e:
Is the above information correct? [::]yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish CCU 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 51 - 65

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): _ 14.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 4.5
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or k(please
please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
a:E /ar NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? g
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available ✓
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,✓
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application?
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field✓
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.✓
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the `74'UP.,.�
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.l
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every.,crop utilized in the WUP.✓
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic' *.—I
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.✓
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted✓
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted✓
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.✓
3.3.15 Lagoontstorage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please bet,�
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility,
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 51- 65

Facility Number: 51 - 65
Facility Name: Barber McLamb Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
RECEIV C
lrUATE
Non-Discha,-ge permitting
Ui„C_{ L/& ' /� (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application fore R.4.tn Cs-- ,�/4't22 4 //�1 "h Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned tome as incou(plete. , x% /]
Signature
Date / r 610
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51- 65

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAMAL^ �^�
FEB a i 2000
PHONE NUMBERS Non -Discharge pem�itn
DWQ 919-•733 —99/9 g
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-`/3'i - SZ)SO
SWCD 919-989 - $38/
NRCS 919-�?]
This plan will'be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.,
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be i3osted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Dial the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage.?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; ?hone
919-- - After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919- -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919- - , local SWCD
office phone number 919- - and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: N
b. Contractors Address: pL&,qA
C. Contractors Phone: D
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRC9, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone
7: Implement procedures as advised by DW4 and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
dauwerof nlwasalam gaetplan.dex
sap[ 17,98

I
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
AND/OR HOLDING PONDS
Clearing: All trees and brush shall be removed from the
construction area before any excavation or fill is started.
Stumps shall be removed within the area of the foundation of
the embankment and all excavated areas. Satisfactory
disposition will be made of all debris.
Construction: Construction will consist of excavation to
the neat lines and grades as planned. In areas of the
lagoon bottom and side slopes where sandy material is
encountered, the area shall be overexcavated by I foot and
backfi'11ed with clayey material. Excavation shall be by
pan, d rag(ine and/or backhoe. A bulldozer or other
equipment will be used to dress the slopes. Fill matbrial
placed in the embankment shall be free of sod, roots, stones
over 6 inches in diameter, and other objectionab(e
materials. The fill material shall be placed and spread
over the entire fill area in layers not to exceed $ inches
in thickness_ Construction of the fill shall be undertaken
only at such times that the moisture content of the fill
material will permit a reasonable degree of compaction.
Compaction of all fill mate►lal shall be accomplished with a
sheep —foot ro( I'er or heavy rubber tired equipment (such as a
loaded pan) passing several times over the entire surface of
each.$ inch lift. To protect against leakage, the entire
lagoon bottom and all excavated side slopes shall be
compacted in the same manner as the fill material
compaction.
Vegetation: All exposed embankment and emergency spillway
areas shall be seeded to the planned type of vegetation
immediately following construction.

OPERATIOIL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions,flush ing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and -traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
I. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion _, Z as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation s]-3.;;3^or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
e. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

OPERATION PLAN (Cont'd)
The routine maintenance of this lagoon involves the
following:
1. -Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the
embankment and in the emergency spillway: Fescue
is being established on these areas. Beginning in
1988 and each year thereafter, the embankment and
emergency spillway should be fertilized with 1,000
pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of weeds, brush, and trees on the
embankment and;,in the emergency spillway: This
shall be done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or
a combination of, all three. This will need to be
done at least once each year and possibly twice in
years favorable to heavy growth. -of vegetation.
You -may check with the local Extension Agent or'
SCS office for 'the latest information on spray
material and the best time to apply them.
Maintenance inspections of this lagoon should be made during
the initial filling, at feast annually, and after every
major storm. items to be checked should include, as a
minimum, the following:
1. Emergency Spill:way
a.. erosion
b.' sedimentation
C. weeds, small trees, logs, fences, or other
obstruction that reduce channel capacity or
may block flow.
2. Einbankmen t
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability— slumps or bulges
c, erosion
d. rodent damage
e. seepage or other leakage
f. condition and typC of vegetative cover

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
tilull cc: Gluse Ithil's III Gwlrol 1115CeIS Site Specific, Pracliccei
...�----- _. _- ---------------- Liqul:I Sysleurs ~---------- --
1=1u:,h f�uuc,s� Accumnlatiou of solids Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumnlaled solids from
Psuers as designed.
ftf- Remove bridging of aced mkiled solids at
discharge
k1gomis ;uul tits CI usled Solids Maintain lagoons, sealing basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent io minimize Ilse
crusting of solids In a depth of no more than ( -
H inefies over more Own 30% of surface.
Excessive vcgcGltive
Decaying vegetation 9,411ilillUlill vcgelalive conlrol along banks of
t.Il,wlll
lagoons and oilier impoundmertls to prevent
accllmuL•alioll of decaying vegelalive maser
along watei s edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systellls
Feed Spillage m� rl i3esign, operate and limillmiu feed Sysleols (e.g-,—
bunkers and Iroughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decrying wastage. N /�
Cl Clean up spillage ona routine basis (e.g., 7 - If)
day illtelvill dorirlg slnnrller; 15-30 day in[crval
dl 'ng wirlterj.
I:Ccd slmn 11;c - .---•
Accumijbilions of feed residues QdAtctfiice moisture aceum1Il-I1i0n within and
around inulledime put ilncaer of feed storll;c
alcas by inset ilig draillagi: ;nvay 1io111 silt
awl/or providing aduquwe comainnrcnt (e.g.,
covered hill for hrewer's grain and similar high
ISIIIR; gralll I)IM1111C1Sl.
lLr Irl5pGCt lllr --md I'clllove Ilr b!'C;lk III) accirllmIaled
Solids ill Ghcr strips around fccll Slor ge as
m
ANIH' - 1'luvelllbcl 1 I, 11)96, l'age I

Source Cruse IIMPs to Control I1154els Silt S pecific Prarlices
Animal I lolling Ardis Accumulations of animal wastes n Eliminate low areas Ilrat trap moisture along i
and feed wastage fences and olber locations where ►vasle
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal
f-I Maintain fence rows and filler strips -hound /
animal bolding areas to minimize
accrrmulalions of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break tip accunullaled solids as
needed).
Dl y Kf.unne I hulling Acciunrulallons of animal wastes 171
sysielns
n
Remove spillage on a rontine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day inlervai during summer; 15-30 day inlerval
(luring winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure f�
stockpiles. / �/
171 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulaled
wastes in filler slril)s aramd stockpiles and
manure handling areas as heeded.
For more ulfOnnalion conlact the Cooperative Extension Service, Deparlment of lartornology, [lox 7613, North Carolina Slate I lniversily,
Ititicigh, NC, 27695-7613.
ANUC - Ilo-111hur 11. 1996, 1'a11,t:2

Nlortahty Management Nlethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
:.! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the round within ?' hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowins
—/stream orpubiic body of water.
I� Renderina.at arendering plant licensed under G.S. I06-163.7
-? Complete incineration Pic/C
In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit or = size and design
auoroved by the Department of Aaricuiture
Anv method %vhich in the professional opinion of the State veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead artimzi's value witbout endanserinz
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State veterinarian :rust he
attached)

I'.,FIII:.IC�uI
- Aoint.11 ll,Idy %mfacc->
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
catIsc
.` wil1[: I)I1)d11L'll[111
!1i[ly 11woulc-covacfl ilrlln1i11S
Wc1 o);ouuc-covered flnnrs —
11.,IIIII,; L I i I,:cI[„II I,I - I lrille;�
• I',uliul nlicrrdlial 41CC1)utpnsili0ll
11h11's 941 114lninlicc Odor
UL' t,1a{iVC of woodcd buffers;
fiCC[In)nlCndCd I)est 111en1agenlei 11 paclices;
(i[)od judgnlenl and Cnm1nn11 sense
ly ilonrs
— .'luucd floors; ---�
W:Ilcrcrs lncat[:d nvCF sloped flnnrs;
ceders al High end of solid floors;
SCr)pe Manure hrliId111) frolo flnnrs;
]urlerlloor ventilation for drying
-- �rc(Ioen1 nlanurC reolnv;ll by flush, I)il rl:cll; Q C,
or scrape;
14-1f7i'viertloor venlilali[)11
Vc-I,Ili.11l,ltl 1'\l,.t„'.t Il[I', - V[il;IdllCi15C5' '
!, f7 Ian 1 lit III leu;nlc:e;
I InSI t-fIIC1Cn1 itlr' nI1 MILCnt
lu 1„„I :ull.,,.,:, Ihlsl Washdutivn hcl+vccn l;fnup:; of arlinfllls-
fl F[:e[I tldrlilivcs;
171 feeder covers;
FI Fcc,l delivery dowrlspool extcn[lcrs 14) fcedcr
covers
-
AI;ilalion ofjecycicd lagoon fl i;lush tank covers; —
li,itlid while lama arc litiinl; ❑ I_xIcild fill lines In near hn11nn1 of Ia[da with
siphon vents
• AgiGllion rlloinl; wuslcwalcr Ilu[lerfloor flush with undailoor• velllilalion
[_oovcyallce
• — Al;iialion ofFC-CyClcll tal;onn fI Fxlcnd Iechafge lines to near ttorlonl ofpils
lipoid while Ails arc lillinl; wilh al►ti-siphon vents
Agil;tlion (luring sloop lurk 0 %111►Ip Wilk Cnv[:Is --
lilliol; and (frawdown
ACitation dtuitkg w;IstC+vulCf f-1 11ox covers
(IUnveyallcc
Silt Sliccific Vnicl ccS
it
5,
r.
1�
s'
li AMg u: 1Juerull,,:, 11. 1906, Pai;c .1

IMPS in Minimize (odor Silr SlleciCic i'racliccs
I:nJ 4,1,+I+.1illtlip,:5 .1l -
_Cause:
.- Agilathm Hulling mmmcwumu
r"7 Extend glischarl;c point of pipt:•s lllideracalk
c)nvcyanct;
II non liquid level
l.:,l;,l,nt ,ul I.Irc;
- VnEatile gas cnliss"";
a III►cr lagoon l q"hl cupachy;
I llol+lhlcal mixing..
l'agooll ShIl11I1 Ilrncedilres;
;-�r"lininiumsurface area -In -volume ratio;
!- lvliniulunl agilatinu When pl"np1g;
F1 Mechanical acralian;
n Proven llimogical a+ldilives
III IW.I[IUII spl lul.lcr
• I llgll pressure ughatlfln;
rl'I'"Ile on dry flays Wllh little or tin Wllld;
Mild 4166
,
Milunluul recounnendlal a lcratin ressurcm
I tP
I'nnlp intake near lagoon liquid surface;
f1 I'rtnip from second -map lagoon
1.1111. ,u kPAI1..._..._i'+ulia! micrul>ial decnulpnsitifl+t; fl 1lollnnl nr midlevel lo:uling.
Mixing While filling., Cl 'I•aril: covers; ,� /
• Agitalinn when emptying n Basin surf Ice orals of solids; /"/.4
n I'ruverl biological addilives ur oxid:ulls
IL I,.,.i,1 :AIt C;& ,- I',utial nu, nl,iul dccnulpusilio+l; r7 lixlcnd drainpipe outlets nndernullh lilplid
Alixinla wllflc 1111iflg; level;
• Agiladon When emplyirlg f-1 Itemovc Seined solids l-egularly
t'. l.111114 [, y1111 I'� u+ , 11, 111; �:• Ag11:N inn LVIIL'li S IIL'iHllll i; ~� -
1 rJ Soil injection nl sillrry/shull;es;
�I �1 �.111C1 unII1:+; • 1'nl:rllle ':IS C111KnIls N/1
!� C7 Wash residual ntannrc liom spreader slier nse;
11 PI'flVell l,Iflhlhil::ll ;uhlidVC:i Ell'ox1+I:u115
c _-....-- --- ---
Iu1 „r,:I.:�I +u.nlnl�:, 1'nGude Las cluissi+llls,vlltlf7 Sall Injccllflll nfslulrylslufll;cs _
:I,uly 1u �,Iu.l1„_ Iul flrLl dryiul;
n Sild hlcorporalion wilhin Oft Ills.;
f7 ;Ilr,:ud in Ihin unifi,lm layl:rs for rapid drying;
f1 l`I cu
per biological addilivrs nl' o> id;ulls
!
I1:•I,I 11111 u.11- 1';It I:iISS d,:[nlll 1f15111nn �—
... i toerspslluln o!'earcass+a G�
1li:.lai .u11t,i,il .11 .I,•,'.. I - l',111:;IS5ll,:I nllltlfljllill+l �) Colnplew clsvclilll; ill' c;Ilcas:.cs ill I,tni;tl pi15;-
I,tl 1-1 Proper Inratinu/r.nnsllur.tionrlffhsposalpies
A r.11 I, I I'll r111 n I I I , I ',' 1t,, I'.11;1: •1
i

Stine iG _-�--
`_i1,ni,11116 walcl d1miml
J,c,.ilulc�
Cunse
- �--Inipruper cltrairiaUc;
A9ic:roliial clecuml►nsiiioil of
euuauic niurler
1IMPs to Minimize 041411'
Grade and landscape such 111i11 waler drains
away from liicililies
Silts! Specific IIractices
N1,11rlltc llild. cl (in[o Poorly maimained access roads farm access road maimenance
pulllic: walls Ilom l;1ru1
a1:c:css .
Addinimid hil'm mainiu : Available From:
5111inc A1;1nut.: 1•11Iil Ij:CI1lc:nl ; (13N 1111CAIN41' Packet - NCst], Colmly Extension Ccoler
Swills 1'1c1i octi'm Cal III l'ulcilial ()ilur Saurccs and Remcclics ; FBA Facl Sbect NCSIJ - IIAI_
Switic 141nluc:liva I acility Mauurc Manal;emeul: Pit Itectlarge; - Litgootl Twalmcnl ; FBAF 128-88 NCSIJ - IIAI-
`:wine I'iutlile liilil I ac:ilily MiInurc Managenirm: llndeilloor flusli - I-ligoori Trealmew ; EIIAF 12948 NCSIJ - BA 1:
I awu(1n I)csiLit and ALu1;2gemenl ftir I.Ivesluck Manure Trealmeul and Slorage ; FBA 1: 103-83 NCSIJ - IIAI:
(',i11Ui.1Li0ni-of 1lLuuuc ;io11 Appliewion E(luipmenl ; Ii11AF Fact Sbeel NCSIJ - IIAI=
{'nulrcilliill; ( )11Mu i Iiun1 5wiuc Iluildings ; I'll1-33 NCS11 - Swine t:xlcnsion
Lnviricnnl�ut it Aasuc;mcc 11mgFiuli ; NPl'C' Manua! NC fort: Prculucc(s Assoc
{ lll�nul5 1411 L1;u1;11;ing ( Mof ; a rep(ul Iiom Ibes Swine Odor Tas1: I•orcc NCSIJ Al;ri Cnnlmenlic;elinns
I Iili�i111�C I'u11,:1:tu; sit Aniiwil hiarinrc A'lanal;e:nrcrlt: Oililr5 anti I'Iics ; PIMI{17, 1995 C1l11I'CIC11ce Proceedings Flnrida Cooperalive lixlension
AAI( it , 11,1 , 1111., 1 1 I, 1'-J'i(,, I'.c1;�: 1
11

NATURAL_ -:
RESOURCES 806 NORTH STREET
JDA CONSEEt1fATION ` SMITHFIELD . NC. 27577=9998
SERVICE TEI!EPHONE:9`1>9L9$9-538'
1z'c �Aml7
October 9, 1996
Joy Sherrod
Civil Engineer
USDA -MRCS
Tarboro Technical Services Office
P O Box 10
Tarboro, NC 27886
Dear Joy:
RECEIVED
WATER QUAIJTY SECTION
FEB 01 220
Non -Discharge Permitting
Enclosed are two irrigation plans for John M. Langdon. I have included revised copies of
the waste utilization plan that show the irrigated acreage.
I have looked over the designs by Dr. Sneed. I believe all the required information is
contained in the plans and it's fairly easy to understand.
Please review these plans and send me a letter of approval for each so I can get them
approved for NC Ag Cost Share.
If you have any uestions, call me.
C�
Kenneth C. York
District Conservationist
enclosure

r- -
Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
3405 Malibu Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-6505
Phone: [phone] — Fax: [phone]
September 19, 1996
Mr. John M. Langdon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504
Dear John:
Enclosed are the design and specifications for the Barber-McLamb Farm and the redesign for the
Creech Farm. With both of these I have included a bill of materials which should be helpful to the
company that installs the system. With some innovative design there is adequate land at the Barber-
McLamb Farm. Note that it is recommended that you do a little clearing of woods on the west end
of the field. There is also one part -circle sprinkler, which I do not particularly like on a system. but
I was trying to get you all the acreage possible.
On the Creech Farm, Fields UN91UN 10 did not provide quite enough acreage so I showed 1.3 acres
in Field UN7. That is rune sprinklers and that land is not too steep and should be suitable for coastal
bermuda hay/small grain hay.
1 have discussed both of these with Kenneth York. I have signed off on the design certification for
both systems. The installer will also have to sign a certification. If the installer makes changes to
the design, then he needs to sign both the design and the installation. Only people approved by the
Division of Soil and Water for various phases of Animal Waste Certification can sign these forms.
Be sure that you have all the proper certifications.
I have also included a bill for the rest of the work which I have done on the redesign of the Creech
Farm, and the design for the Barber-McLamb Farm. The bill which was mailed on February 13,
1996, covers the work on the home farm, the redesign on the home farm and the original design on
the Creech Farm.
Hopefully you can start these system installations very shortly. You should not be building new
lagoons and buildings in 1996.
I am mailing a copy of all the plans and specifications to Kenneth York and he should have them the
same time that you receive them. I have sent you two copies, one to keep and one to share with the
installation contractor.
Consulting Engineer -- Irrigation Design, Wastewater Management, Environmental Policies and Regulations

Cal me if you have questions or comments.
Sincerely,
4W16c,",
Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
RES:sws
Enclosures
c Mr. Kenneth York, District Conservationist, NRCS, USDA, Smithfield, NC
langlet2

Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
3405 Malibu Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-6505
Phone: [phone] -- Fax: [phone]
September 19, 1996
Mr. John M. Langdon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504
Dear John:
Enclosed are the design and specifications for the Barber-McLamb Farm and the redesign for the
Creech Farm. With both of these I have included a bill of materials which should be helpful to the
company that installs the system. With some innovative design there is adequate land at the Barber-
McLamb Farm. Note that it is recommended that you do a little clearing of woods on the west end
of the field. There is also one part -circle sprinkler, which I do not particularly like on a system, but
I was trying to get you all the acreage possible.
On the Creech Farm, Fields UN9fUN10 did not provide quite enough acreage so I showed 1.3 acres
in Field UNT That is nine sprinklers and that land is not too steep and should be suitable for coastal
bermuda hay/small grain hay.
I have discussed both of these with Kenneth York. I have signed off on the design certification for
both systems. The installer will also have to sign a certification. If the installer makes changes to
the design. then he needs to sign both the design and the installation. Only people approved by the
Division of Soil and Water for various phases of Animal Waste Certification can sign these forms.
Be sure that you have all the proper certifications.
I have also included a bill for the rest of the work which I have done on the redesign of the Creech
Farm, and the design for the Barber-McLamb Farm. The bill which was mailed on February 13,
1996, covers the work on the home farm, the redesign on the home farm and the original design on
the Creech Farm.
Hopefully ,you can start these system installations very shortly. You should not be building new
lagoons and buildings in 1996.
I am mailing a copy of all the plans and specifications to Kenneth York and he should have them the
same time that you receive them. I have sent you two copies, one to keep and one to share with the
installation contractor.
Consulting Engineer -- Irrigation Design, Wastewater Management, Environmental Policies and Regulations

Cal me if you have questions or comments.
Sincerely,
44c,",
Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.LD.
RES:sws
Enclosures
c Mr. Kenneth York, District Conservationist, NRCS, USDA, Smithfield, NC
langleQ

D) Anniication and Handliag Famiawnt
Check thk appropriate box
'Exisriaiaci ity with exis nQ waste annlication e.auiR=nt (WUP or 1)
.Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
lwieav,�n Wzxistinc-facility_ without exisling wa5legppligg tiQgsQuin (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
I plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ Ronald E. Sneed, P.E. , C. I.D.
Self-Em to ed
Afftliataon: '
Address(Agencv); 3405 Malibu Drive, Raleieth, NC PhoneNo.: gig/187_786:Z
Signature: _ Ale_ 27607_6505 Date: September 19. 1296
III.:certificatiOn of Installation
A) � ctiSilll. SJQrag&"TLCatrnent Mstallation
New, exPAnde1&r retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
I
ave been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name:of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
AffiRition:
Addreis(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date-
AVVC -- April 24, 1996

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Barber-McLamb Farm
John M.Langdon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE I - FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
County: Johnston
Date: September 17, 1996
Field*
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
Of Field
(Acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop (s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(In/Hr)
Maximum
Application
per
Irrigation
Cycle
(Inches)**
T2849 - 1
1.00
Gilead
6-10
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.35
OS
T4056 - 1
1.17
Gilead
6-10
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.35
0.5
T4056 - 3
.50
Varina
0-2
Coastal Bermuda Hav and Small Grain
0.40
0.5
T2850 -
UN2
1.80
Varina
0-2
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.40
0.5
Tata1
4.47
All of this land is under one ownership and in the same crop so the fields are essentially treated as one field.
A sprinkler precipitation rate will be selected to be less than the infiltration rate of the most restrictive soil.
* * Even though the District Conservationist has indicated that one inch of irrigation can be applied at one
time, it is suggested that the total application be limited to 0.5 inch at one time and space the applications
several days apart. By doing this there should never a problem of any runoff or erosion problems.
bmc-tabl

TABLE 3 - SOLID -SET IRRIGATION SPRINKLER SETTINGS
Sprinkler spacing is 80 feet by 80 feet. Each lateral is controlled by gate valve.
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Can use Nelson F70 APV, Rain Bird 70 CWH or Senninger 7025 RD-1 --
All with 9/32-inch nozzle.
Field No.
and
Line No.
Number of
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
application
Rate
(inlhr)
Operating Parameters
Along
Pipeline
Between
Pipelines
Nozzle
Diameter
(inches)
Operating
Pressure
@ Gun (psi)
Operating
Time
Q Hydrant (hr)
T2849 - 1
135
80
80
0,26
9/32
55
2.0
T4056 - l
135
so
80
0,26
9132
55
2.0
T-4056 - 3
135
so
so
0.26
9132
55
2.0
T-2850 -
UN2•
135
80
so
0.26
9r32
55
2.0
* One sprinkler in Field UN2 next to an old building is 3/4-circle operation and it should be equipped with
a 1/4-inch nozzle. The discharge at 55 psi will be approximately 13.0 gpm and the radius will be
approximately 50 feet. The application rate will be approximately 026-inch per hour, the same at the full
circle sprinklers. This part circle sprinkler will probably be a Rain Bird Model 65 PJ ADJJINT. The nozzle
will probably be listed as a # 16, rather than 1/4-inch.
bmctab3

TABLE 4 - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid -Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
17
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
80
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
0.26
Hose Length (feet)
xxx
Type of Speed Compensation
xxx
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Electric
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
7.5
TABLE 5 - THRUST BLOCK SPECIFICATIONS
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.)
90' Bend
1.43
Dead End .7 x 90' Bend
L00
Tee .7 x 90° Bend
1.00
Ground Entry at Pump
1.90
There are two 90' ells, four tees, one ground entry at pump and no dead ends. The
3-inch pipe will be bell and gasket, the 2-inch pipe will be solvent weld. The valves
on each of the laterals will be 2-inch brass or plastic gate or ball valves, rated at 200
psi.
bmc-tb45

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR THE BARBER-MCLAMB FARM
LEASED BY JOHN M. LANGDON
The Barber-McLamb Farm is a 543 head feeder to finish operation. It is a single finishing floor with
a primary lagoon. The waste utilization plan was approved January 31, 1996. The facility will
produce 1249 pounds of PAN per year. Crops to be grown include coastal bermuda hay over seeded
with small grain hay. The total land available (less buffers) for land application is 4.47 acres. Based
on the soil type (Gilead and Varina) and realistic yield expectations (RYE), the 4.47 acres can
accommodate 1377 pounds of PAN. Therefore there is adequate land available. The crops will need
to be cut for hay and not grazed due to the reduction that must be taken when a crop is grazed rather
than cut for hay. There are actually four different fields, because of different tract numbers, but all
the land is under one ownership (Mrs. Faye B. McLamb). The fields are adjacent and the irrigation
system is laid out not considering the boundary between the four fields.
A solid -set (permanent) irrigation system is recommended. All sprinklers will be single nozzle, full
circle with the exception of one single nozzle part circle sprinkler at a corner of an old building.
Spacing on all sprinklers is 80 feet by 80 feet. The sprinkler radius is approximately 67 feet. (The
sprinkler spacing is approximately 60 percent of the diameter which is an acceptable spacing and
should provide a coefficient of uniformity_ of approximately 77 percent. Recommended average
sprinkler operating pressure is 55 psi.)
A road buffer is observed on the north side of the property, however, no buffer is observed on the
east side of the land application side since the landowner is the same. A 100 foot buffer is observed
next to the well.
Lateral line size is all 2-inch Class 160 IPS, PVC plastic pipe. The maximum friction loss in the
longest lateral line is approximately 7 psi. Inlet pressure to the first sprinkler on each lateral should
be approximately 59 psi and the last sprinkler on the six sprinkler laterals will be approximately 52
psi. The supply line is 3-inch Class 160 IPS, PVC plastic pipe. The supply line will be bell and
gasket pipe. All of the lateral line will be solvent -weld pipe. Friction loss in the longest portion of
the supply line is approximately 3.5 psi.
A 2-inch brass or plastic gate or globe valve will control the flow to each lateral. Since there will
be control of each lateral, it is recommended that the sprinklers be attached to the laterals with a 2-
inch threaded short nipple of Schedule 80 PVC, a Schedule 40 90" ell, and a 2-inch riser pipe of
Schedule 40 PVC pipe. The riser will need to be supported by a metal angle iron or wooden post.
The height of the riser should be approximately 2-3 feet above the ground. If it is 3-feet, another two
pieces of Schedule 40 IPS, PVC plastic pipe will be needed.
There needs to be a combination air relief/vacuum release/pressure relief valve at the pump. The
size should be 1-inch. There should also be a 1-inch air relief/vacuum release valve at the two ends
of the supply line. These valves can be plastic, brass or cast iron, but they should be rated at a
minimum of 200 psi working pressure. These valves will also be mounted on a 2-inch Schedule 80
threaded short nipple and a Schedule 40, IPS, PVC 2-inch riser and be supported by a metal angle
iron or wooden post.

There should be thrust blocks where the supply line comes from the pump and goes into the ground,
at the tee in the supply line from the pump and at the six tees in the supply line where the laterals are
connected. The 2-inch gate or globe vales can be threaded or mechanical joint (threaded will be less
expensive).
The pump and electric motor should be a 7.5 HP single or 3-phase with a capacity of 105 gpm at 190
feet TDH with a pump efficiency of at least 65 percent and a NPSHR less than 10 feet. The TDH
calculations show 185 feet, but need a little extra for wear. An example is a Gould Model 3656/3756
size 1 '/2 x 2-8 with 6 3/4-inch impiller. This is a cast iron pump, close coupled with a nominal 3450
rpm motor. Some Gould. catalogues may show this pump with a 7-inch impiller, but it will need to
be trimmed down to 6.75-inch to ensure that the 7.5 HP electric motor is not overloaded. Safety
control includes a manual disconnect switch, magnetic starter with properly sized heaters (no more
than 1.5 amp above rated operating current). The size of the heater will depend upon whether single
phase or 3-phase electric service is available.
On the discharge side of the pump, both a gate valve or butterfly valve and a check valve need to be
installed. The check valve will prevent flow back through the pump when the system is shut down,
The gate or butterfly valve will be used to control the pump discharge. Also on the discharge side
of the pump a combination air relief, pressure relief and vacuum release valve should be installed.
Some kind of priming device will need to be installed on the suction side of the pump. The suction
pipe should be at least a 3-inch. Some kind of strainer needs to be installed on the end of the suction
pipe. A foot valve can be an optional item. While it works, it reduces the priming requirements.
CALCULATIONS
GPM = 17
SS=S,=80ft.
PR= 96.3x17
80 x 80
TDH for Svstem
Source
Sprinkler Pressure (Average)
FL in lateral line
FL in main line
Elevation Difference
FL in valves
96.3 x GPII
SS x S!
0.26 inch per hour
Head si
55.0
7.0
3.5
9.0
5.5
80.0 psi = 185 feet

Pump HP for System
GP -Alf x TDH{feet)
3960 x Pump Eff
105 x 185 = 7 55 HP
3960 x .65
(A 7.5 HP electric motor should be adequate.)
Thrust Block Calculations, 90° Ell
A _ 98HD a sin a
B 2
H = 185 feet
3.12 inch 23 inch
D = _ .269 feet
B = 650 lb/ft-
a = 90'
A = 1.43 ftZ
From NRCS 430 DD, thrust blocks for dead ends and tees are 0.7 that for 90' ells. There is not a
calculation for a ground entry or Z pipe. It probably should be 25 to 33 percent more than that
required for a 90' ell. In this case it should be approximately 1.90 ft'.
Since the 2-inch gate valves will be threaded, or mechanical joint, there is no requirement for thrust
blocking, but it is recommended that a thrust block be used, composed of an U-bolt over the two
ends of the valve with the ends embedded in concrete. Please several layers of plastic between the
U-bolt and the valve.
System Operation
This system is a 6-zone system. Each zone has 5 to 6 sprinklers. One zone is operated at the time
by opening a valve and then starting the pump. The maximum run time for each zone should be
approximately two hours. The coastal bermuda hay in Field 1, Tract 2849 and Field 1, Tract 4056
can receive 240 pounds of PAN or approximately 3.5 inches of irrigation or seven 0.5-inch
applications. This will require 14 hours of pumping. The small grain on all fields can receive 0.73
inches of irrigation or a total of approximately 2.8 hours of irrigation. Field 3, Tract 4056 and Field
UN2, Tract 2850 can receive 275 pounds of PAN and therefore 4 inches of irrigation or eight 0.5
inches of irrigation. This will require 16 hours of pumping.
3

Since the lagoon temporary storage is only three months, it si important that the lagoon be pumped
regularly with the last application on coastal bermuda hay just prior to a frost and the first application
as early in the spring as possible.
While an hour meter or flow meter is not required on the pump, it is important that good records be
kept of the number of hours of operation. Rainfall events may increase or decrease the total amount
of wastewater that has to be pumped. On the average a total of approximately 108 hours of pumping
will be required each year.
During the winter months when temperatures are below freezing the risers need to be drained at least
into the lateral lines. Water should not freeze at the buried depth of 24 inches which is the
recommended depth for laterals and supply line. The pump, suction pipe and ground entry pipe need
to be drained or protected from freezing using heat tape or some other type of heat
Sprinklers and air relief/vacuum release valves should be checked periodically to ensure that they
are operating properly. Check to ensure that the pressure gauge at the pump is operating properly.
The pressure gauge should be glycerin filled to ensure that the wastewater does not damage it. It is
recommended that a second pressure gauge be installed on one of the last risers in Field 1. Tract
2849. That should be the most distant location and at the highest elevation.
It is not necessary that the pump, motor and control panel be placed in a shelter, but it is
recommended that a small building be constructed to house the equipment.
E ui ment Needed
7.5 HP 3400-3600 rpm electric motor and close coupled pump with capacity of 105 gpm at
190 feet TDH with an efficiency not less than 65 psi and NPSHR not greater than 10 feet.
Pump shall be cast iron with cast iron. bronze or brass impiller. Pump shall be equipped with
3-inch section line, diaphragm hand primer or equivalent, suction strainer of at least l 2-inch
by 6-inch such as supplied by Perfection Sprinkler. Equipment on the discharge side of the
pump shall include a 3-inch gate or butterfly valve, a 3-inch check valve and a combination
air relief/vacuum release/ pressure relief valve. Discharge pipe shall go into the ground
using two 45 ° ells. The discharge piping can be Schedule 80 IPS, PVC plastic. black iron
or galvanized steel 3-inch. Pump suction pipe can be equipped with a foot valve. Suction
pipe can be Schedule 40 IPS. PVC or rubber, or a combination. The pump should also be
equipped with a spring loaded check valve to use in the priming process.
6 2-inch gate or globe valves, brass or plastic rated at 200 psi working pressure. Valves shall
be equipped with a handle extension to allow the handle to come to the surface. Valve shall
be threaded on each end with FIPT. Install a 6-inch to 8-inch pipe around the valve and equip
it with a cover.
30 pieces of 3-inch by 20-toot Class 160. IPS. PVC plastic pipe, bell and gasket
4

117 pieces of 2-inch by 20-foot Class 160, IPS, PVC plastic pipe with couplers, solvent weld.
Plan on installing a 5-10 foot section of pipe at the end of each lateral line beyond the last
sprinkler to serve as a trash collector.
12 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS. PVC end caps (S)
35 2-inch by 2-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IFS, PVC plastic tees (S x S x FIPT) - These will
be used to attach the risers to the laterals and also for attaching the two air relief/vacuum
release valves to the supply pipe.
2-inch by 2-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC plastic tees (S x S x S)
3-inch by 3-inch by 3-inch IPS, PVC plastic tee ( B x B x B) - Harco or equivalent
6 3-inch by 3-inch by 2-inch IPS, PVC plastic service tees (B x B x FIPT), Harco or equivalent
6 2-inch by 6-inch Schedule 80, IPS, PVC nipples, (MIPT x S)
3-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC reducing bushing (s x s) - At the end of the supply
line (both ends) install a short section of 3-inch pipe in the 3-inch by 3-inch by 2-inch service
tee, then the reducing bushing, a short section of 3-inch pipe, a 2-inch by 2-inch by 2-inch
tee for air relief/vacuum release valve, a short section of 2-inch pipe and the end cap. Pour
thrust block at end of the line.
2 2-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS. PVC plastic 90' eils (S x S)
41 2-inch by 6-inch short nipples. IPS Schedule 80 PVC plastic (MIPT x MIPT)
35 2-inch by 2-inch, IPS, Schedule 40 PVC plastic 90' ell (FIPT x S)
8 2-inch by 20-foot Schedule 40 IPS, PVC pipe, plain end (will be cut into 4 or 5-foot sections
for risers for the sprinklers and for the air relief/vacuum release valves)
35 2-inch by 1-inch IPS, PVC Schedule 40 reducing couplers (S x FIPT)
34 Sprinkler, with 9/32-inch nozzles, I -inch male base. This can be the Nelson, Rain Bird or
Senninger models listed on the specifications. The nozzle may be listed as # 18 rather than
9/32-inch.
Sprinkler, part circle with 1/4-inch nozzle. This sprinkler should have 1-inch male base and
probably will have to be the Rain Bird Model 65 PJ ADJ-TNT. The nozzle may be listed as
916 rather than 1/4-inch.
2 Air relief/vacuum release valves, 1-inch FIPT such as Cripen Model ALI0. This is a cast
iron valve. There are less expensive models available and can be used provided they are
rated at 200 psi working pressure.

3 1-inch by I -inch short nipple (MIPT x MIPT). This can be galvanized, black iron or
Schedule 80 PVC. Used to connect air release/vacuum relief valve to the riser.
*1 Combination 1-inch air relief/vacuum release pressure relief valve (1-inch FIPT). The
pressure relief valve should be adjustable and should be set at 34 psi above maximum
system operating pressure.
* 1 3-inch gate on butterfly valve, 200 psi working pressure, brass or plastic.
* 1 3-inch check valve, 200 psi working pressure, brass or plastic.
* These three items are Iisted as a part of the pump and electric motor combination. Since the
pump will be down hill from a portion of the area where land application is occurring, there
is a definite need for the check valve to keep the liquid from running back through the pump.
There should be drains installed to be able to drain the pump, suction pipe and discharge pipe
and the sprinkler risers during freezing weather. The owner should work with the irrigation
installer to decide where these drains need to be installed. They can be 1-inch gate or globe
valves and where possible the waste water should be drained back to the lagoon or into a
shallow gravel filled pit.
3-4 Quarts industrial grade PVC cement -209. Needed for installing 2-inch lateral line pipe and
end caps.
4-5 Quarts pipe cleaner - 214. Needed for installing 2-inch lateral line pipe and end caps.
More cement and cleaner may be needed depending on the installers.
Note: Where there are threaded plastic fittings, Teflon tape should be used on the threads to ensure
a water tight joint.
2 Glycerin filled pressure gauges. 0-150 psi 1/2-inch, MIPT. (One in the field and one at the
pump.)
2-inch by 2-inch by 1-inch tee, Schedule 40, IPS, PVC plastic (S x S x FIPT)
I -inch by 4-inch Schedule 80, IPS, PVC plastic nipple (MIPT x MIPT)
1-inch by 1/2-inch, Schedule 40, IPS, PVC 90' ell (MIPT x MIPT)
bmcspec

Performance Curve S-Group Pumps 3A1, 3BF, 3AB ... High Head
METERS FEET
50 r- 160
40
120
Cl a 30
= 80
20-
0
H
40
10
00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 GPM
I _ I I I
0 10 20 - _ 30 M3/h
CAPACITY
■■�■■■■!I!■■�■■■■_■■■■■_®
�W�/I■�■■�■
■■.■■ice■■■■■■■■■■■■
Performance Curve S-Group Pumps 5A1, 5BF, 5AB .. .
METERS
MODEL 3656/3756
100
a
a
60
U_
a
z
a
40
r
O
F-
201
Mel
--�RPM
3500-ODP
GROUP
250
200,
Sri
50
�■1■■■■ILA=
WEIillWAM
MM�1JNJMMRi/
af+t
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 GPM
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 m3/h
CAPACITY
u
�GOULDS PUMPS, INC.
WATER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
SEN=C- =0.L'S ':Ew rrC�< I_:cF SPECIFICATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. PRINTED IN U -S,A.
9

11 Performance
Performance Curve S-GroQp Pumps 3AI, 3BF, 3AB High Head
METERS
FEET
50-
160
40-
120
30-
LU
80
20-
0
40
10
-
I'll
- rl
MODEL 3656
02
NONE
OEM
WWI
NNiNgI
IN
1111
ISO
===aEwl
a
8MIUMEMN
OEM
IN
EMINMEN
I
ME
OMME
MEMO
lwl-Vw':q-ffiEMwA�3
0
MEMEMEMOMMEEM
MWEEIIIRNVVI
■�1EROMM
MEN
N■■■==■■■mm
EAMEMLAWWWWRENEEM
MEN
MEMNMNMM
ME
ON
NONE
on
MMEMMMMEMMMEMMMMEEMMMM
MINKEENUMMEMMEN
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 GPM
I I I I
0 10 20 30 m3/h
CAPACITY
Aw
Performance Curve S-Group Pumps SAI, 5BF, 5AB ...
METERSI FEET
100-
-
300
80-
250
6o-
200
z
150
40-
0
-
100
20-
so
MODEL 3656/3756
RPM 3500-OOP
11VIT
GR06P
N
�■�
�-�
aINo��
IFAV
MEMO
0
M
NOR
i�1"Ib�'!!
�Nir�0
FEE.
will
Altlo
L
I W.
s
t W6.
g
p4sm
A
Iml
=wh
-
P NO lw_
A
U Ul 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 GPM
-j- L
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 M31h
CAPACITY
GOULDS PUMPS, INC.
WATER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
rALLS ';-Z,Y Yr-P< 13f4F SPECIFICATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. PRINTED IN U.S.A.
9

f! F_roti'•;
H
SIZE
1.00
1.25
1.50
00
1.315
1.660
1.900
1 D
1.189
1.502
1.720
WALL
0.063
0,079
0.090
THK
FRICTION LOSS CHARACTERISTICS
PVC CLASS 200 IPS PLASTIC PIPE
(1120, 1220) SDP 21 C = 150
PSI LOSS PER 100 FEET OF PIPE (PSI/100)
Sizes 1" thru 5"
Flow GPM 1 thru 1200
2.00 2.50 3.00
2,375 2.875 3.500
2.149 2.601 3.166
0.113 0.137 0.167
3.50
4,00
5.00
SIZE
4.000
4.500
5.563
OD
3.620
4.072
5.033
1 D
0,190
0.214
0.265
WALL
THK
O V!
- �n
O y
- h
O Vi
w
O cq
H
O f!1
_ N
C V]
sn
C N
�:
7 y
C
?�
ma.
L0.Jp
Vp]
!!o
m
m
V7 0
m
> 1
>Wanud
0.y
>mL�L
J
3 LL
J
>
J
>LL
a J
> lL
p. J
� li
d J U. 67
1
0.28
0.02
0.18
0.01
0.13
0.00
1
2
0.57
0.07
0.361
0.02
0.27
0.01
0.17
O.00
2
3
0.86
0.14
0.54
0.04
0.41
0.02
0.26
0,01
0.18
0.00
3
4
1.15
0.24
0,72
0.08
0.55
0.04
0.35
0.01
0.24
0.01
4
5
1.44
0,36
0.90
0.12
0.68
0,06
0.44
0.02
0.30
0,01
5
6
1.73
0,51
7.08
0.16
0.82
0.08
0.53
0.03
0.36
0,01
0.24
0,00
6
7
2.02
0.67
1.26
0.22
0.96
0.11
0.61
0.04
0.42
0.01
0.28
0.01
7
8
2.30
0.86
1.44
0.28
1.10
0,14
0.70
0,05
0.48
0,02
0.32
0.01
8
9
2.59
1.07
1.62
0.34
1.24
0.18
0.79
0.06
0.54
0.02
0.36
0.01
0.28
0,00
9
10
2.88
1.30
1,80
0,42
1,37
0.22
0,88
0.07
0.60
0.03
0,40
0.01
0,311
0.01
10
11
3.17
1.56
1,98
0,50
1.51
0.26
0.97
0.09
0.66
0.03
0.44
0.01
0,341
0,01
11
12
3.46
1.83
2.77
0.50
1.65
0.30
1.06
0A0
0.72
0.04
0.48
0.02
0.37I
0.01
0.29
0A0
12
14
4.04
2.43
2.53
0.78
1.93
0.40
1.23
0.14
0.84
0.05
0.56
0.02
0.43
0.01
0.34
0,01
14
16
4.61
311
2.89
1.00
2.20
0,52
1.41
0.17
0.96
0.07
0.65
0.03
0.49
0,01
0.39
0,01
16
18
`"5';19
5:87
1 3.25
1.24
2.48
0.64
1 1.59
0
1.08
0.09
1 0.73
1 0.03
0.56
0.02
0.44
0.01
1 18
20
.5.77
:�,4.71
3.67
7.51
2.75
0.78
1.76
0.26
1.20
0.10
0.81
0.04
0.62I
0.02
O,a9
0.01
0,32
0.00 20
22
=6:34
= i5.62
3.97
7.80
3.03
0.93
1 .94
0.32
1,32
0.12
0.89
0.05
0.68
0.02
0.54
0,01
0.35
0.01 22
24
mfi;92'i
6:60
4.34
2.12
3.30
1,09
2.12
0,37
1,44
0,15
0.97
0.06
0.74
0,03
0.59
0,02
0.38
0,01 24
26
'a7.50.::7,65
4.70
2,46
3.58
7.27
2.29
0,43
1.56
0,17
1.05
0,07
0.80
0,03
0.63
0.02
0.41
0.01 26
28
:"8:08
't8,78
5.06
= 2:82
3.86
1.46
2.47
0.49
7.68
0,19
1.13
0.07
0.87
i 0.04
0.68
0.02
0.45
0.01 28
30
8,65
;9.98
5.42--3.20
4.13
1,66
2,65
0,56
1.80
0.22
1,22
0,09
0.93
0.04
0.73
0.02
0.48
0.01 30
35
•10:1,0
13.27
6:32
..4.26'
4.82
2.20
3.09
0.75
2.11
0.29
1,42
0.11
1.08
0.06
0.86
0.03
0.56
0.01 35
40
,1,1:54
1.7,'00
7.23
5.45
5.51
2
, .82
3.53
0.95
2.41
0.38
1.62
0.14
1.24
0.08
0.98
0.04
0.64
0.02 40
45
12:98
21:74
8:13
-,6.7$'
6.20
;=,3.51.
3.97
1.19
2.71
0.47
1,33
0.18
1.40
0.09
1.10
0.05
0.72
0.02 45
50
i4:42',25.70
9:04
8:24
'6.89
4.26
4,41
1.44
1 3.01
1 0.57
1 2.03
0.22
1,55
0.11
1.23
0,06
0.80
0.02 1 50
55
15.87
30.66
9.94
9.83
'7,58
4,85
1.72
3.31
O.6"
2.23
0.26
1,71 : 0.14
1.35
0.08
0.88
0.03 551
60
17:31
36.02
10.65
1'1055
.8.27
,'5.09
5.97
5.30
2,02
3.61
0.80
2.44
0,31
1.86I 0.16
1.47
0.09
0.96
0.03 60I
65
:18.75
41:77
11,:75
13:4p'
'8.96
:,6.93
5.74
2,35
3.92
0.93
2.64
0,36
2-02 0.79
1.59
0.10
1,04
OA4 65
70
12.65
16i37
"- 9.65
7.95
6.18
2.69
4.22
1.06
2.84
0,41
2,17 0,21
1.72
0,12
1.12
0.04 70
75
13.56
17cAT
•10.34
9,03
-6.62
3.06
4.52.
1.21
3.05
0.46
2.330,24
1 134
0,14
1 1.20
0,05 75
80
14.46
19168.
11.03
•10.18
„7.06
3,44
4,62
1.36
3.253.45
0.52
2.49' 0.27
1.96
0.15
1,28
0.05 801
85
75i37
22:02.
,11:72
;7`1:39:
J;7i50
3.g5;
.1.52
0.59
2.64 p-30
2.09
0.77
1.36
0.06 85
90
V27,
24'�48'
12:4
:12:fi6
'7;95
'4.28;
,..5:12
: 5,42
,..1,69
3.66
0.65
2.80 0.34
2.21
0,19
1.44
0.07 90
95
77.'18
27 OE
,13'10
:53.99
-8:39
4.7,4i
.V 5.72
3.86
0.72
2,95 0.37
2.33
0.21
1.53
0.08 95
100
18.08
W-
i3.79
±8.83
i .Y
T6.03
_1.1,87
0
4.07
0.79
3.11 0.47
2.46
0.23
1.61
0-OS 100
110
19.89
35.50
15:17
'•18.36
9.71
' 6.2,1
':,6,63
2.45
4.47
0.94
3.421
0.49
2.70
0,28
1.77
0.10 110
120
16.54
21.57:
10.60
7:30=
-,-7.23
:;2,88
4.88
7,11
3.73I
0.58
2,95
0.33
1.93
0.12 120
130
17.92
25 02'
11 .48
8:47-
:,7.84
-'3.34
5.29
1.29
4.04
0.67
3.19
0.38
2.09
0.13 130
140
18.30
28.70
'1,2.36
9.71%.
%;8.44
_:3.84
5.69
1,47
4.35
0.77
3.44
0.43
2.25
0.15 140
150
13:25
i f 04'•
9.D4
-4`36
6.10
1.68
14.67
0.87
3.69
0.49
2.41
0.18 760
160
14.13
12,44:
9.64
4.91
6.51
1.89
4.981
0.98
3,93
0.55
2.57
0.20 1601
170
15.01
13.9i
10.25
5.50
6.91
2.11
5.29
1.10
4.18
0.62
2.73
0.22 170
180
15.90
15.47 r.16.85
6.11
7.32
2.35
5.60
1.221
4.42
0.69
2.89
0.25 180
190
16.78
17.10
•11.45
•:6.75
7.7.3
2.60
, 5.91
1.35
4.67
0.76
3.06
0.27 190
200
17.66
18.80-
12.06
7.43'
8.f4
2.85
`6.22
1.49
4.92
0.84
3.22
0,30 200
225
19.87
23.38
13.56
-:g.24
9.15
3.55
7.00
1.85
5.53'
-.'1:04•
3.62
0.37 225
250
15.07
71.23
10.17
4.31
7.78
2.25
1:6:15,
:1'.27
4.02
0,45 250
275
16.58
13:39
11.19
5.15
8.56
2.68
?`eJ6
`1':51
4.42
0,54 275
300
18.09
15.74
12.21
6.05
9.34
3.15
':3.38
:,1:78
4.83
0.63 300
325
19.60
18.25 113.22
1
7.01
10,11
3.65
-','7.99
-`2.06
5,231
0.74 1 325
350
14.24
8.05
10.89
4,19
' 8.61
2.36
.5.63
0.84 350
375
15.26
9.14
11.67
4.76
.9.22.
.2.69
6.03
0.96 375
400
16.28
10.30
12.45
5.37
9.84
-3,03
6.44
1.08 400
425
17.29
11,53
13.23
6.01
10,45
3,39
6,84
1.21 425
450
78.31
12.81
14.01
6 6
11.07
7
7.24
1 450
475
19.33
14.16
14.78
7,38
11.68
4.16
7.65
1,48 475
500
15.56
8.11
12.30
4.58
8.05
1.63 500
550
17.12
9.68
13.53
5.46
8.85
1.95 550
600
18.68
11.37
14.76
6.42
9.66
2.29 600
650
15.99
7.44
10.46
2.65 650
700
i
17.22
8.64
11.27
3.04 700
750
18.45
9,70
12.07
3.46 750
800
19.68
10.93
12.88
3,90 800
850
I
13,69
4,36 850
900
14.49
4,85 900
950
i !
15.30
5,36 950
1000
16.10
5.89 1000
1050
! i
16.91
6,45 1050
1100
17.71
7,03 1100
1150
i
19.52
7.64 1150
1200
1
1
19.32J
8.26 11200
Note: Shaded areas of chart indicate velocities over 5' per second. Use with Caution. _
(Continued)

Example of d i r" eren 4 arranaemen is for thrust b f o[.<s .

Anchorace block's for in -line valves

53-45
REV. Jan. 1995
Tama 183. SWAM AMAEACa1C LAGOON LiCU13 FERTILIZER murtIENTi
."Ou"
erraArriigryararpaaaa�aararrarr■ra
rlaaya
Type of Miami
Animal unit
fatal AAWObic
Total Lagoon
Plant
Plant
rotal
Plant AveltAote
Of L"It
Equivaterti
Lagoon Liquid
Liquid
Maltrient
Mutriwf
Nutrients
Mutrie"s �^
PrVC=114n
Live WfgRt
Capacity,
5w-p4us,-•'-
Aveitabilfty
frribstodi
snit -"
...............
ft3/
per &viols(
Caeffieiants
-----...---'l4/
In11 final 4aaf1
aninel unit
unit/year
•
................
------------
irriratad
t1;ts/
lbi/ animal
single 2-1tege
acre-
••r•
ace*
acre unit/
...... lba------
............ ....•------..__......-----------------.--------------------------........................--....................
stage tat • 2nd
gals inch
inch
melt Year
YeenLing-to Oer
10 50 3Q
60 43 11
191 .0070
M
.30
Q6
44 .48
Feeder h*W
P2>b
.70
13
37 .2a
cs>pssllN
ICZO
.70
133
93 .66
Feeder*ta
30 i20 1313
M 200 7E
927 .4
03
M
.50
tab
68 2.3
Finish h
PM
.70
S3
37 1.3
cameit
K20
.70
133
93 3.1
f
farrer-to qrr
4i3
450 433 215
32133 .12
ie
.50
91
49 3.4
liianlims actiira
P20
.70
33
23 2.9
9:1w
K20
.110
89
62 7.3
Farrow -to per
322
7M 523 260
3861 .14
M
3o
91
41 6.5
Fe~ octi
PZOS
.70
35
25 3.5
K2a
.70
89
62 8.8
Farrow -to pMr T417 ZL33 2123 7La 10478 .39 M .!a 136 68 26
Ffnisn acti P203 .70 53 37 14
S�w =0 .70 In 93 36
Referanew= DePts Of
ilologieat and A01CUit ML &Mineering; Animal Scfenas; North Caralina State Unfvarsity; Jan 1990
Agrcxm c
Division, North Carotird Deast-OWC of Agriculture
Assuone 4i14-Lb sate and boar an tfsiCad fad, 3-rl: old wm jIng. SO -lb feeder pig,
220-Ih market hog and 10 gigs/sau/year
Estimated total lagoon tlquid inctudes tatat Liquid amnure pits average arr%At
rainfalt"Surpius Ineldan at to Lagoon
surf*=; loos net account fer seepage.
saw* Irrigated: sprinitter frritaf6d Liquid astcaverad for 1 aenth or longer.
C
T46ja 1aC. LAW APPLICATION OF SLIIN9 ARAMMIC LAG= 41CUID •
Type of Anfeal Asia-
Lagoon Liquid ApPLication Asti
1aW MA L&Md Area for Liquid Application "
Olt unit Limiting
.................. frrigtted------------------
....................
Irrigatad------------------
PrW=tton Mutrfent
---------------- Lb7s/acre/year................
------------------
lbs/acrrlyaar----------------
Unit M
SO too 150 Zoe 2!0 3W 330 4C0
50
100 150 NO no 300 330
400
P205
20 .44 60 a0 100 120 144 760
20
43 60 60 100 11O 140
160
120
50 100 ISO 200 Ze0 300 330 440
10
t00 ISO 200 2Sa I= 33C
400
•.............. .....•-------------•----_-----------------------------
--------------------------•----------------------------
•---.......--....inches/Year-----------------
................acres/animal
unit--------------
1leenling-ta pr{r M
.13 1.5 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.4 5.1 5.9
.00%
.004a AM .0024 .0019 .0016 .0014
.0012
Feeder held 0205
.54 1.1 1.6 I.Z 2.7 3.2 3.a 4.3
.013
.0065 .OW .003'3 .COU .00I2 .0019
.0016
em"ity X20
.34 1.1 1.4 Z.1 2.7 3.2 3.7 4.3
.013
.00" .00" .0033 .0026 .0022 .0019
.0016
Feeder -to pop M
.73 1.1 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.4 3.1 5.9
'-:047
.023 .016 .012 .am .007a -OC66
.0054
Finish heed P203
.!4 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.1 3.2 3.a 4.3
.CW
.032 .021 .016 .oil .Oil .oM
.aa79
catsaei9y ZZO
.54 1,1 1.4 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.7 4.3
.064
-032 .021 .016 .013 .011 .0091
.0080
Farrar -to pair M
1.t i.Z 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 7.7 3.8
.11
.054 .036 .027 .02' Ala .015
.01.1
W MM99 acti4v PUS
.31 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.3 4.9 3.7 6.5
.1%
.073 .DA9 .036 .029 .024 .OZ1
.015
sow R70
.30 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.3 1.6 6.s
.13
.473 .049 .037 .029 .024 .021
.21a
Farrar -to P7 )1
1.1 t.2 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.4 7.7 3,a
.13
.06$ .043 .032 .026 M .018
.316
Feeder actirie P20
.31 1.4 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.9 5.7 6.5
.18
-ova .0S9 .046 .031 .029 .025
-722
1=
.30 i.6 2.4 3.2 4.0 : 8 5.6 6.4
.18
.GU .039 .0" .a3S .029 .023
.322
i
Farrow -to Pei: M
.713 1.3 Z.2 2.9 3.r 4.4 $-1 5.9
.53
.Z6 Aa .13 .11 AM .M
-766
Pfnlan active 0=5
.54 1.1 1.4 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.A 4.3
.'n
.3b .24 .18 .14 .12 .10
.U9
SWA KM
.1.14 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.7 4.3
.72
.36 .24 is .14 .12 .10
.090
,.,+..�r..sr '
s.,,,�rw. a..�n.assays=a:•sa.a..as..,...a..r,....,......e..+u.•
• Aetererreae:�0eoea of
3iatogfcal 8 AgriCutturat "ineering. Sail Science,
Crap
Science; March Carolfna SC Univ; ;ah 19
•• M fertilisation rate
should 9e consistent vita realistic arO0 yieid.
k LaacMimq irtd Cenitrifieat'.on
i
and P205 sail :Mono ration urwccounled for.

RECEIVED
WATER QUALITYSECT(ON
Non-D'scharge Permitting
MESSAGE
Name L Date
Address
Telephone
Farm 4f Tract #
Message: (:�SA /a' _ Y=t-2 Z�2
zvaaL�� �& ..__._ i J_/ S _ _ T
U

/.7 '' _ '1

LAGOON
- Distance from t Barest residence %j Q
Soils /- p Plumber of Animal Units or Total lbs.��,7`�O
Type Lagoon �G Kind of animalds W ),
Volume JUnits X ft. _
-- _ '71.3 cu. yds.
27
HOLDING VOLUME waste +rain + 25-year storm)
Period 3yf Watershed 0,;16 acres
Waste_ �(o p _cu. yds. , rain .�BZ, cu.
25-yr. storm -- (a9-,:P=
yds.
Total_ l cu. yds.
LAND DISPOSAL � total. aces ,
`ta
FERTILIZ ATIO14 & SEEDING % ' �� acres
Lime Fertilizer
Seed Mulch
o
Length Width1�45� ion Width
f 7Z�Z,
Top of fill - - - - - - - - -elev. "7 -
of holding volume
Too of lagoon volume -� - - - elev. �3
Se, a/ y?3l�- /df��/ S//r'M ' Glee •
Bottom of lagoon - - - - - - elev. • O
�dTop rC
_/G
Emergency spillway - - - - - -elev.
of
Interior side slopes � •
ea ,'
/
,
%
4�0 �"N� e 4T Jc r c��CJ�js r�
r� e.5 / 9rr e d � /y •�.� � //t��r �c- 9°�� G'�
o�
C e. � q ,- G e �-
.1—
v
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
-
Drawn ----------------- 177�.
TracfC........................... ........
-- ---- --- ..............
------ ------------
Tilll..-----•------------------_'----
None
.......
of
Drawm{NO.
t7
SCS-ENG-313A REV 8-75

Animal Waste Svstem
E
Locacion Ila
0
01
Sketch Sheet 2 of 2 I
f

Lv�
�`
•
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�� PAGE 1
October 8, 1996
PRODUCER:
JOHN MICHAEL
LANGDON
RECEIVED
LOCATION:
7728 RALEIGH
ROAD
WATER QUALITY SECTIM
BENSON NC
27504
TELEPHONE:
919-894-3039
�FB ncno
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
Nan -Discharge peTMItUng
NUMBER OF
ANIMALS: 600
hogs design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal, waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
600 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 1140 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
600 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 1380 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 3
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & MA -Ss-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
BFT_
2849
1
GILEAD 6-10
6.0
300
0
1
300
MAR-OCT
2849 50 1 1 150
SEP-MAY
MAR-OCT
4056 SG 1 150 0 11.17 158.5
SEP-MAY
4056 3 VARINA 0-2 BH 5.5 1275 0 1.5 1137-.5
MAR-OCT
4056 1-3 1 SG 1 150 0 1.5 125
SEP-MAY
MAR-OCT
2850 -UN2 SG 1 150 0 11.8 190
SEP-MAY
END
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
PAGE 4
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small drain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 5
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
BS N
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
TABLE 1 1 4.47 f 1507
TABLE 2
TOTAL 1 4.4
AMOUNT O
*** BALANCE
1 150
1380
-127
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 222 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

r WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 6
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.8 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
None.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 7
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall'be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 8
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). -If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 9
NAME OF FARM: BARBER-MCLAMB FARM
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: JOHN MICHAEL LANGDON
SIGNATURE
DATE: /0`9'—feP
NAME OF MANAGER ( if d 1 ,'Oent from owner)
/ please print
SIGNATURE:
iVsVa*
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Kenneth C. York
AFFILIATION: NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
SIGNATURE:
�' DATE: IV— 4F -,,'V

I

.. � , . . .
;.�,
.-.
y

i � • r
rip t
,'f
h�, w Y rASJ"�T,1' n
.� F'r'ie'y �#s. !w x 11ar i�.LA.fr✓.F,.$� 1� rr '�+-v �, �
p s_..�, f3" til, •x �r { �'r. �.,ui'tr s''r. �wi t N•`~,�
0 o f A y Tz >c, I stln SS 1 s 1 .a 3d d �5D y n 4 i�
<' r,eG i'Sa• a'"-."_" k t r�',� ,< ({ tl. 'ijr7 T : �,> { a '�\ * ye. /
its
. ;41,1 "s q�yp'" x � � u r 4 c'Y�g� �� ✓ � ,�,,r! }� ,�"' f to ' ;. `
�•: SA �i 1 +4 ' °' .,,r � i/50;. j,) t,j '�`�i` �� o� 4 bIt �� T ' 1
hh A
a
o"r+"����
�;r. k • �� �, , r' �' ✓,,�. %-�A�ra� ��:� ���,..� ° t�4 �, _ �' ramON
An
-
{i V �.r 4- ii f •. } 4, �, F n� s� F _ i © F.Y.
*� y ll ' \ I _t 1 - Y' L ^ • ''."1 1 l . kw�
`�
k `} Nti .. .h`1 .zF H,o II �'i. •>.`�. 8
�;-`+,rF�. y' e ��- � ., F i'� `-r •.� �.. ^r 'x' ' p"r � f � .�..,:.r.r:r.:.:.�:_2� ` �'i-- t ., �. ; 4 � t� L`7 `�'
�`�' �f/.; '� i. `' �..y - Y . ,_ �• � 1! 8ni' � 4 :w � � 1 ' q 'Y�..s.. •----'-�_...,.�-�'-^•-cam � , f
'1�',�` - f 1 ..�_4 a'^•F� '�� -. l V ��..,N [(((1 .k t � F _ � .I M J! .I"y � -.. 1 ~ � i1. - .Rw�=Y-1--'- $
�\ iry-
LIS-
11�.i , c cp,M 1 ..i�:'�, h.,- �••}� 1 "� B L,- h,1 i ''r �� S �,
�") Ir •. •l .e `.' t } _ 1�ti k-. 14.s p ri^ r "'� .� T/
it ' I •: i wF } iti 4�*., � ,.� �i..f . ':•� H, x �r , �:� - ' .
'��.'.'- •�j. � 6 .^$lBQ�• � ,�\.. "•/(t i - �liT b �~ � _ yi= 25� P ! 0 _ 1� I\t
IJ
1 .' 30 1& * as , %C`em "
r 6 ..� r - •a y •r/ T � h n i t \'f0 �� � ��,�� =�,�_�• 4 },
�;' _�_=___•� �-� �' e po�....�_.�` � cam' k;t x �}~ �S r ��.,���"-•�``�J�i`1' F�� �;\ �yo
y "•' i` �. �}�'� L✓ �. � + �l� crf •'„' .''C%'- / � �'.` ��''

State of North Carolina,
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 20, 2000
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Attn: David McLamb
rop U ft
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510065
Additional Information Request
Barber McLamb Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear David McLamb:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by May 20, 2000:
1. Your application states that the manager of this farm is different from the owner. Please
have the manager sign the permit application. I have enclosed the application for your
convenience.
2. This facility is certified for 543 feeder to finish swine, however your Waste Utilization
Plan (WUP) is written for 600 feeder to finish and the volume of your waste storage pond
appears to only be adequate for 600 feeder to finish. If you would like to be permitted for
543 feeder to finish please submit a new WUP for 543 feeder to finish. However, if you
would like to be permitted for 600 feeder to finish please submit a new certification for
600 feeder to finish and documentation to show that the waste storage structures at the
facility are adequate for 600 feeder to finish.
3. Waste Utilization Plans written and signed after September 1, 1996 are required to
include irrigation parameters detailing allowable irrigation amounts. Please consult a
technical specialist and have your WUP modified to include irrigation parameters.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before May 20, 2000
or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200
and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 51-0065
Barber McLamb Farm
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

2.
State of North Carolina ti�2
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Pemut Application Form No 4 i r
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) � 'Sob
General General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations t.
WATER ou �TyV E �
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please revt�ew t ff CTION
information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a question has not 440 c2fnyl�mjy
the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FaciIity Name: Barber McLamb Farm
1.2 Punt Land Owners name: Fay & David McLamb _
1.3 Mailing address: 6812 EIevation Rd
Nora-Discha-ge Permitting
City, State: Benson NC Zip: 27504
Telephone Number (include area code): 894-4632
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. PIease include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a cow
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): I40 to NC 210, turn right go 0.7 miles then turn right on SR
1330., go I mile to farm on right._ arm Smllej /10"-7,1% 0", ztc !=,,,
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): John Lan don 7728 Raleigh Rd Benson NC 27504
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): John Langdon Murphy Family Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/78
1.9 Date(s).of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 51 (county number); 65- (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
543- Certified Design Capacity cl��P i�S rv- d* o be04 C r
Is the above information correct? Elyes; E2rno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
4C� 0 Non -Layer
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Turkey
lvoie f 7A's VJRs Ae WaP -- ,v o f 7'�, �00
TyRg of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 51- 65

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system):14.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in -the AWMP): 4.5
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): I _
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or k(please
please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
aYE or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? '
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?_—//�-,7g
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general Iocation map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,✓
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.✓
3.3.4 The soil series present on every Iand application field✓
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.✓
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every cro shown in tl1_ 4 UP.&✓
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every -crop utilized in the WUP.✓
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.I0 A site schematic.
3.3.1 I Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices notedl.,--,'
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices notedx✓
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method notedl'-'�'
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please bel�
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 51- 65

:a
Facility Number: 51 - 65
Facility Name: Barber McLamb Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
RECEIVED
UrgTER Q,1JA, Fri' SEC-i0
Non -Discharge rermit.rr;
I, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2). attest that
this application for .� 3�i���_ „��Q rr+�^1CA_ e''M 6-1— acility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned toine as incor6lete. , /,4 /i
Signaturi
Date / , _ _ 6 6
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, h
application for —)
has been reviewed
application are not
will be returned as
Signature
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
�►�,..r'lp�`Yl'1_I'n5 __ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
6pleted and 4t if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application packap
Date IT 616)
APPLICA'I ION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
RECEIVED
WATER OuALIiYSECTION
MAY 3 1 200
Non -Discharge permitting
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51- 65

RECEIVED
TER QUALITY SECTION
4AY 3 1 20C13
��� u A 7/d �`.9 . ��c. ry, . •l�" .... �/y -Discharge Permitting

�7 X
-2sa .
= a f%Sa
g4�aZ5
/25
1.33 9a q

nz412 s-,Y 9Y5`

m
NC-ENG-14
8/72
(formerly NC-60)
PLAN OF EXCAVATED FARM POND
Name
1
ti
C q
n
Ar
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
SCD
No. REAP Date
Req.
SIDE SLOPE TO 1 /
AVE. TOP ELEV. Q�i
/ y�0 N
- - - - - - MID SECTION
AVE. BOTTOM ELEV.
LENGTH
Volume cu. yds. Acre ft. Pond Use`
T12' berm with less than 6` spoil height sloped away from pond
1' berm with less than 3' spoil height uniformly spread & sloped away from pond
Volume in depth C rea of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 Y area midsection
cu yds. 6
27
Surface Area acres (If more Location Sketch
than 0.25 ac. "Impounding Permit"
is required)
Volume REAP Cost Sharing
cu. yds.
Soil Type
B.M. Description
Elev.
Distribution:
1 copy landuser
1 copy plan folder
USCA.f'S.fT, WORTH, TSSAS 19T=

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN i''l PAGE 1
October 8, 1996
PRODUCER: JOHN MICHAEL LANGDON
LOCATION: 7728 RALEIGH ROAD RECEIVED
y
BENSON NC 27504 �ArtERQUpt3iYSIrCIIC+�
TELEPHONE: [phone] MAY 3 1 200J
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine NmDischarge Permitting
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 600 hogs design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 1.5A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
600 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 1140 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
600 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 1380 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 3
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
,T.0 -
2849
1
GILEAD 6-1
B^
10
0
1
300
MAR-OCT
2849 SG 1 150 0 1 150
SEP-MAY
MAR-OCT
4056 SG 1 150 0 1.17 158.5
SEP-MAY
405 9 3 IVARINA-0-2-% BH 5.5 1275 JO 1.5 113775�
MAR-OCT
END
SEP-MAY
MAR-OCT
SEP-MAY
TOTAL 0
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 4
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
END
TOTAL 0
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted' fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermuda.grass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small qrain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling For best results.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 5
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
L S
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BER14UDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
4.47 1 1507
4.47
AMOUNT OF PRODUCED
*** BALANCE
50
1 1380
f -127
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 222 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 6
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water. `
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.8 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive
for assistance in determining the amount of waste
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
None.
the waste analysis report
per acre and the proper

r
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 7
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference -- Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.
PAGE 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 9
NAME OF FARM: BARBER-MCLAMB FARM
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: JOHN MICHAEL LANGDON
SIGNATURE J DATE:
NAME OF NAGER (if ditWent from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Kenneth C. York
AFFILIATION: NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
SIGNATURE: �' DATE: /V--"���

f
a

3D...
NaTUf Af_ A9-SOURCES 806 NORTH STREET
CONSERVATION SMITHFIELD, NC ,:.27577-9998.
SERVICE TELEPHONE [phone]
RECEIVED
/ /'m c �,4m d WATER QUALITY SECTION
dA,f 3 ti t,JUJ
October 9, 1996
Joy Sherrod
Civil Engineer
USDA -MRCS
Tarboro Technical Services Office
P O Box 10
Tarboro, NC 27886
Dear Joy:
t on-Mcharge Pena+tong
Enclosed are two irrigation plans for John M. Langdon. Ihave included revised copies of
the waste utilization plan that show the irrigated acreage.
I have looked over the designs by Dr. Sneed. I believe all the required information is
contained in the plans and it's fairly easy to understand.
Please review these plans and send me a letter of approval for each so I can get them
approved for NC Ag Cost Share.
If you have any uestions, call me.
C,
Kenneth C. York
District Conservationist
enclosure

Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
3405 Malibu Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-6505
Phone: [phone] — Fax: [phone]
September 19, 1996
Mr. John M. Langdon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504
Dear John:
Enclosed are the design and specifications for the Barber-McLamb Farm and the redesign for the
Creech Farm.. With both of these I have included a bill of materials which should be helpful to the
company that installs the system. With some innovative design there is adequate land at the Barber-
McLamb Farm. Note that it is recommended that you do a little clearing of woods on the west end
of the field. There is also one part -circle sprinkler, which I do not particularly like on a system, but
I was trying to get you all the acreage possible.
On the Creech Farm, Fields UN9/UN 10 did not provide quite enough acreage so I showed 1.3 acres
in Field UN7. That is nine sprinklers and that land is not too steep and should be suitable for coastal
Bermuda hay/small grain hay.
I have discussed both of these with Kenneth York. I have signed off on the design certification for
both systems. The installer will also have to sign a certification. If the installer makes changes to
the design, then he needs to sign both the design and the installation. Only people approved by the
Division of Soil and Water for various phases of Animal Waste Certification can sign these forms.
Be sure that you have all the proper certifications.
I have also included a bill for the rest of the work which I have done on the redesign of the Creech
Farm, and the design for the Barber-McLamb Farm. The bill which was mailed on February I3,
1996, covers the work on the home farm, the redesign on the home farm and the original design on
the Creech Farm.
Hopefully you can start these system installations very shortly. You should not be building new
lagoons and buildings in 1996.
I am mailing a.copy of all the plans and specifications to Kenneth York and he should have them the
same time that you receive them. I have sent you two copies, one to keep and one to share with the
installation contractor.
Consulting Engineer -- Irrigation Design, Wastewater Management, Environmental Policies and Regulations

Cal me if you have questions or comments.
Sincerely,
4weex"
Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
RES:sws
Enclosures
c Mr. Kenneth York, District Conservationist, NRCS, USDA, Smithfield, NC
langlcO

Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
3405 Malibu Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-6505
Phone: [phone] -- Fax: [phone]
September 19, 1996
Mr. John M. Langdon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504
Dear John:
Enclosed are the design and specifications for the Barber-McLamb Farm and the redesign for the
Creech Farm. With both of these I have included a bill of materials which should be helpful to the
company that installs the system. With some innovative design there is adequate land at the Barber-
McLamb Farm. Note that it is recommended that you do a little clearing of woods on the west end
of the field. There is also one part -circle sprinkler, which I do not particularly like on a system, but
I was trying to get you all the acreage possible.
On the Creech Farm, Fields UN9/UN10 did not provide quite enough acreage so I showed 1.3 acres
in Field UNT That is nine sprinklers and that land is not too steep and should be suitable for coastal
bermuda hay/small grain hay.
I have discussed both of these with Kenneth York. I have signed off on the design certification for
both systems. The installer will also have to sign a certification. If the installer makes changes to
the design, then -he needs to sign both the design and the installation. Only people approved by the
Division of Soil and Water for various phases of Animal Waste Certification can sign these forms.
Be sure that you have all the proper certifications.
I have also included a bill for the rest of the work which I have done on the redesign of the Creech
Farm, and the design for the Barber-McLamb Farm. The bill which was mailed on February 13,
1996, covers the work on the home farm, the redesign on the home farm and the original design on
the Creech Farm.
Hopefully you can start these system installations very shortly. You should not be building new
lagoons and buildings in 1996.
I am mailing a copy of all the plans and specifications to Kenneth York and he should have them the
same time that you receive them. I have sent you two copies, one to keep and one to share with the
installation contractor.
Consulting Engineer -- Irrigation Design, Wastewater Management, Environmental Policies and Regulations

Cal me if you have questions or comments.
Sincerely,
4w4c,",
Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.
RES:sws
Enclosures
c Mr. Kenneth York, District Conservationist, NRCS, USDA, Smithfield, NC
langlet2

D) Anglic2tion alld Handling Faijium ni
Check 14 appropriate box
Exe facilitvyrith Mistin wart S�ppll tion;Q.uiornent (wUP or i)
amin
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
:necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
I
i bex+�rx Ygzidd?fuail#tcasRE�xisting facili{y without existing was_-_r to application eQil (i)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name pfTechnical Specialist (Please Print): _ BonAld _ E. gnee p,J . , C, I . D. -
Affiliazon:_-- Self -;ETgloyed — — _ -•--
Address(Agencv): 3405 Malibu Drive Raleigh, NC Phone No.: a1 Q,/-7A7_7AF7
27607-6505
Signature: 2&&&JE Date: sentemher 19,1996
III. �Certi` xcatidn of Installation
A) Caliectign. Sxoraee-T[IgLMent installation
New, de Qr retrofitted lgcility (Si)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not linuted to -lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilihies without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name`of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affilia�rion•
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC .: April 24, 1996

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Barber-McLamb Farm
John M.Lanedon
7728 Raleigh Road
Benson, NC 27504'
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE I - FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
County: Johnston
Date: September 17, 1996
Field*
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
Of Field
(Acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop (s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(InlUr)
Maximum
Application
per
Irrigation
Cycle
(Inches)**
T2849 - 1
1.00
Gilead
6-10
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.35
0.5
T4056 - 1
1.17
Gilead
6-10
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.35
0.5
T4056 - 3
.50
Varina
0-2
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.40
0.5
T2850 -
UN2
1.80
Varina
0-2
Coastal Bermuda Hay and Small Grain
0.40
0.5
Total
4.47
* AlI of this land is under one ownership and in the same crop so the fields are essentially treated as one field.
A sprinkler precipitation rate will be selected to be less than the infiltration rate of the most restrictive soil
* * Even though the District Conservationist has indicated that one inch of irrigation can be applied at one
time, it is suggested that the total application be Iimited to 0.5 inch at one time and space the applications
several days apart. By doing this there should never a problem of any runoff or erosion problems.
bme-tab l

TABLE 3 - SOLID -SET IRRIGATION SPRINKLER SETTINGS
Sprinkler spacing is 80 feet by 80 feet. Each lateral is controlled by gate valve.
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Can use Nelson F70 APV, Rain Bird 70 CWH or Senninger 7025 RD-1 --
AII with 9/32-inch nozzle.
Field No.
and
Line No.
Number of
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Application
Rate
(in/hr)
Operating Parameters
Along
Pipeline
Between
Pipelines
Node
Diameter
(inches)
Operating
Pressure
@ Gun (psi)
Operating
Time
Hydrant (hr)
T2849 - 1
135.
80
80
0.26
9/32
55
2.0
T4056 - 1
135
80
80
0.26
9132
55
2.0
T-4056 - 3
135
80
80
0.26
9/32
55
2.0
T-2850 -
UN2•
135
80
80
0.26
9/32
55
2.0
* One sprinkler in Field UN2 next to an old building is 3/4-circle operation and it should be equipped with
a 1/4-inch nozzle. The discharge at 55 psi_ will be approximately 13.0 gpm .and the radius will be
approximately 50 feet. The application rate will be approximately 0.26-inch per hour, the same at the full
circle sprinklers. This part circle sprinkler will probably be a Rain Bird Model 65 PJ ADJ-TNT. The nozzle
will probably be listed as a ## 16, rather than 1/4-inch.
bmctab3

TABLE 4 - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid -Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
17
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
80
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
0.26
Hose Length (feet)
xxx
Type of Speed Compensation
xxx
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Electric
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
7.5
TABLE 5 - THRUST BLOCK SPECIFICATIONS
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.)
90° Bend
1.43
Dead End .7 x 90' Bend
1.00
'lee .7 x 90° Bend
1.00
Ground Entry at Pump
1.90
There are two 90 ° ells, four tees, one ground entry at pump and no dead ends. The
3-inch pipe will be bell and gasket, the 2-inch pipe will be solvent weld. The valves
on each of the laterals will be 2-inch brass or plastic gate or ball valves, rated at 200
psi.
bmc-tb45

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR THE BARBER-MCLAMB FARM
LEASED BY J'OHN M. LANGDON
The Barber-McLamb Farm is a 543 head feeder to finish operation. It is a single finishing floor with
a primary lagoon. The waste utilization plan was approved January 31, 1996. The facility will
produce 1249 pounds of PAN per year. Crops to be grown include coastal bermuda hay over seeded
with small grain hay. The total land available (less buffers) for land application is 4.47 acres. Based
on the soil type (Gilead and Varina) and realistic yield expectations (RYE), the 4.47 acres can
accommodate 1377 pounds of PAN. Therefore there is adequate land available. The crops will need
to be cut for hay and not grazed due to the reduction that must be taken when a crop is grazed rather
than cut for hay. There are actually four different fields, because of different tract numbers, but all
the land is under one ownership (Mrs. Faye B. McLamb). The fields are adjacent and the irrigation
system is laid out not considering the boundary between the four fields.
A solid -set (permanent) irrigation system is recommended. All sprinklers will be single nozzle, full
circle with the exception of one single nozzle part circle sprinkler at a corner of an old building.
Spacing on all sprinklers is 80 feet by 80 feet. The sprinkler radius is approximately 67 feet. (The
sprinkler spacing is approximately 60 percent of the diameter which is an acceptable spacing and
should provide a coefficient of uniformity of approximately 77 percent. Recommended average
sprinkler operating pressure is 55 psi.)
A road buffer is observed on the north side of the property, however, no buffer is observed on the
east side of the land application side since the Iandowner is the same. A 100 foot buffer is observed
next to the well.
Lateral Iine size is all 2-inch Class 160 IPS, PVC plastic pipe. The maximum friction loss in the
longest lateral line is approximately 7 psi. Inlet pressure to the first sprinkler on each lateral should
be approximately 59 psi and the last sprinkler on the six sprinkler laterals will be approximately 52
psi. The supply line is 3-inch Class 160 IPS, PVC plastic pipe. The supply line will be bell and
gasket pipe. All of the lateral line will be solvent -weld pipe. Friction loss in the longest portion of
the supply line is approximately 3.5 psi.
A 2-inch brass or plastic gate or globe valve will control the flow to each lateral. Since there will
be control of each lateral, it is recommended that the sprinklers be attached to the laterals with a 2-
inch threaded short nipple of Schedule 80 PVC, a Schedule 40 90' ell, and a 2-inch riser pipe of
Schedule 40 PVC pipe. The riser will need to be supported by a metal angle iron or wooden post.
The height of the riser should be approximately 2-3 feet above the ground. If it is 3-feet, another two
pieces of Schedule 40 IPS, PVC plastic pipe will be needed.
There needs to be a combination air relief/vacuum release/pressure relief valve at the pump. The
size should be 1-inch. There should also be a 1-inch air relief/vacuum release valve at the two ends
of the supply line. These valves can be plastic, brass or cast iron, but they should be rated at a
minimum of 200 psi working pressure. These valves will also be mounted on a 2-inch Schedule 80
threaded short nipple and a Schedule 40, IPS, PVC 2-inch riser and be supported by a metal angle
iron or wooden post.

There should be thrust blocks where the supply line comes from the pump and goes into the ground,
at the tee in the supply line from the pump and at the six tees in the supply line where the laterals are
connected. The 2-inch gate or globe vales can be threaded or mechanical joint (threaded will be less
expensive).
The pump and electric motor should be a 7.5 HP single or 3-phase with a capacity of 105 gpm at 190
feet TDH with a pump efficiency of at least 65 percent and a NPSHR less than 10 feet. The TDH
calculations show 185 feet, but need a little extra for wear. An example is a Gould Model 3656/3756
size 1 '/2 x 2-8 with 6 3/4-inch impiller. This is a cast iron pump, close coupled with a nominal 3450
rpm motor. Some Gould, catalogues may show this pump with a 7-inch impiIler, but it will need to
be trimmed down to 6.75-inch to ensure that the 7.5 HP electric motor is not overloaded. Safety
control includes a manual disconnect switch, magnetic starter with properly sized heaters (no more
than 1.5 amp above rated operating current). The size of the heater will depend upon whether single
phase or 3-phase electric service is available.
On the discharge side of the pump, both a gate valve or butterfly valve and a check valve need to be
installed. The check valve will prevent flow back through the pump when the system is shut down.
The gate or butterfly valve will be used to control the pump discharge. Also on the discharge side
of the pump a combination air relief, pressure relief and vacuum release valve should be installed.
Some kind of priming device will need to be installed on the suction side of the pump. The suction
pipe should be at least a 3-inch. Some kind of strainer needs to be installed on the end of the suction
pipe. A foot valve can be an optional item. While it works, it reduces the priming requirements.
CALCULATIONS
PR = 96.3 x GPM
S x S1
GPM = 17
Ss=S,=80ft.
PR- 963x17
80 x 80
TDH for System
ource
Sprinkler Pressure (Average)
FL in lateral line
FL in main line
Elevation Difference
FL in valves
= 0.26 inch per hour
Head si
55.0
7.0
3.5
9.0
5.5
80.0 psi = 185 feet'-

Pump HP for System
BHP = GPM x TDH(feet) _ 105 x 185 _ 7 55 HP
3960 x Pump Eff 3960 x .65
(A 7.5 HP electric motor should be adequate.)
Thrust Block Calculations, 90' Ell
A _ 98HD ' sin a
B 2
H = 185 feet
D = 3.23 inch _ 269 feet
i 2 inch
B = 650 lb/ft
aW90'
A = 1.43 ft2
From MRCS 430 DD, thrust blocks for dead ends and tees are 0.7 that for 90° ells. There is not a
calculation for a ground entry or Z pipe. It probably should be 25 to 33 percent more than that
required for a 90 ° ell. In this case it should be approximately 1.90 ft-'.
Since the 2-inch gate valves will be threaded, or mechanical joint, there is no requirement for thrust
blocking, but it is recommended that a thrust block be used, composed of an U-bolt over the two
ends of the valve with the ends embedded in concrete. Please several layers of plastic between the
U-bolt and the valve.
System Operation
This system is a 6-zone system. Each zone has 5 to 6 sprinklers. One zone is operated at the time
by opening a valve and then starting the pump. The maximum run time for each zone should be
approximately two hours. The coastal bermuda hay in Field 1, Tract 2849 and Field I, Tract 4056
can receive 240 pounds of PAN or approximately 3.5 inches of irrigation or seven 0.5-inch
applications. This will require 14 hours of pumping. The small grain on all fields can receive 0.73
inches of irrigation or a total of approximately 2.8 hours of irrigation. Field 3, Tract 4056 and Field
UN2, Tract 2850 can receive 275 pounds of PAN and therefore 4 inches of irrigation or eight 0.5
inches of irrigation. This will require 16 hours of pumping.
a

Since the lagoon temporary storage is only three months, it si important that the lagoon be pumped
regularly with the last application on.coastal bermuda hay just prior to a frost and the first application
as early in the spring as possible.
While an hour meter or flow meter is not required on the pump, it is important that good records be
kept of the number of hours of operation. Rainfall events may increase or decrease the total amount
of wastewater that has to be pumped. On the average a total of approximately 108 hours of pumping
will be required each year.
During the winter months when temperatures are below freezing the risers need to be drained at Ieast
into the lateral lines. Water should not freeze at the buried depth of 24 inches which is the
recommended depth for laterals and supply line. The pump, suction pipe and ground entry pipe need
to be drained or protected from freezing using heat tape or some other type of heat
Sprinklers and air relief/vacuum release valves should be checked periodically to ensure that they
are operating properly. Check to ensure that the pressure gauge at the pump is operating properly.
The pressure gauge should be glycerin filled to ensure that the wastewater does not damage it. It is
recommended that a second pressure gauge be installed on one of the last risers in Field 1, Tract
2849. That should be the most distant location and at the highest elevation.
It is not necessary that the pump, motor and control panel be placed in a shelter, but it is
recommended that a small building be constructed to house the equipment.
Equipment Needed
7.5 HP 3400-3600 rpm electric motor and close coupled pump with capacity of 105 gpm at
190 feet TDH with an efficiency not less than 65 psi and NPSHR not greater than 10 feet.
Pump shall be cast iron with cast iron, bronze or brass impiller. Pump shall be equipped with
3-inch section line, diaphragm hand primer or equivalent, suction strainer of at least 12-inch
by 6-inch such as supplied by Perfection Sprinkler. Equipment on the discharge side of the
pump shall include a 3-inch gate or butterfly valve, a 3-inch check valve and a combination
air relief/vacuum release/ pressure relief valve. Discharge pipe shall go into the ground
using two 450 ells. The discharge piping can be Schedule 80 IPS, PVC plastic, black iron
or galvanized steel 3-inch. Pump suction pipe can be equipped with a foot valve. Suction
pipe can be Schedule 40 IPS. PVC or rubber, or a combination. The pump should also be
equipped with a spring loaded check valve to use in the priming process.
6 2-inch gate or globe valves, brass or plastic rated at 200 psi working pressure. Valves shall
be equipped with a handle extension to allow the handle to come to the surface. Valve shall
be threaded on each end with FIPT. Install a 6-inch to 8-inch pipe around the valve and equip
it with a cover.
30 pieces of 3-inch by 20-foot Class 160, IPS, PVC plastic pipe, bell and gasket
4

117 pieces of 2-inch by 20-foot Class 160, IPS, PVC plastic pipe with couplers, solvent weld.
Plan on installing a 5-10 foot section of pipe at the end of each lateral line beyond the last
sprinkler to serve as a trash collector.
12 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC end caps (S)
35 2-inch by 2-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC plastic tees (S x S x FIPT) - These will
be used to attach the risers to the laterals and also for attaching the two air relief/vacuum
release valves to the supply pipe.
2-inch by 2-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC plastic tees (S x S x S)
3-inch by 3-inch by 3-inch IPS, PVC plastic tee ( B x B x B) - Harco or equivalent
6 3-inch by 3-inch by 2-inch IPS, PVC plastic service tees (B x B x FIPT), Harco or equivalent
6 2-inch by 6=inch Schedule 80, IPS, PVC nipples, (MIPT x S)
2 3-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC reducing bushing (s x s) - At the end of the supply
line (both ends) install a short section of 3-inch pipe in the 3-inch by 3-inch by 2-inch service
tee, then the reducing bushing, a short section of 3-inch pipe, a 2-inch by 2-inch by 2-inch
tee for air relief/vacuum release valve, a short section of 2-inch pipe and the end cap. Pour
thrust block at end of the line.
2 2-inch by 2-inch Schedule 40, IPS, PVC plastic 90' ells (S x S)
41 2-inch by 6-inch short nipples, IPS Schedule 80 PVC plastic (MIPT x MIPT)
35 2-inch by 2-inch, IPS, Schedule 40 PVC plastic 90' ell (FIPT x S)
2-inch by 20-foot Schedule 40 IPS, PVC pipe, plain end (will be cut into 4 or 5-foot sections
for risers for the sprinklers and for the air relief/vacuum release valves)
35 2-inch by 1-inch IPS, PVC Schedule 40 reducing couplers (S x FIPT)
34 Sprinkler, with 9/3 2-inch nozzles, I -inch male base. This can be the Nelson, Rain Bird or
Senninger models listed on the specifications. The nozzle may be listed as # 18 rather than
9/32-inch.
Sprinkler, part circle with 1/4-inch nozzle. This sprinkler should have 1-inch male base and
probably will have to be the Rain Bird Model 65 PJ ADJ-TNT. The nozzle may be listed as
# 16 rather than 1/4-inch.
2 Air relief/vacuum release valves, I -inch FIPT such as Cripen Model AL10. This is a cast
iron valve. There are less expensive models available and can be used provided they are
rated at 200 psi working pressure. -
5

3 1-inch by 1-inch short nipple (MIPT x MIPT). This can be galvanized, black iron or
Schedule 80 PVC. Used to connect air release/vacuum relief valve to the riser.
*1 Combination 1-inch air relief/vacuum release pressure relief valve (1-inch FIPT). The
pressure relief valve should be adjustable and should be set at 3-4 psi above maximum
system operating pressure.
* 1 3-inch gate on butterfly valve, 200 psi working pressure, brass or plastic.
* I 3-inch check valve, 200 psi working pressure, brass or plastic.
* These three items are listed as a part of the pump and electric motor combination. Since the
pump will be down hill from a portion of the area where land application is occurring, there
is a definite need for the check valve to keep the liquid from running back through the pump.
There should be drains installed to be able to drain the pump, suction pipe and discharge pipe
and the sprinkler risers during freezing weather. The owner should work with the irrigation
installer to decide where these drains need to be installed. They can be 1-inch gate or globe
valves and where possible the waste water should be drained back to the lagoon or into a
shallow gravel filled pit.
3-4 Quarts industrial grade PVC cement -209. Needed for installing 2-inch lateral line pipe and
end caps.
4-5 Quarts pipe cleaner - 214. Needed for installing 2-inch lateral line pipe and end caps.
More cement and cleaner may be needed depending on the installers.
Note; Where there are threaded plastic fittings, Teflon tape should be used on the threads to ensure
a water tight joint.
2 Glycerin filled pressure gauges. 0-150 psi 1/2-inch, MIPT. (One in the field and one at the
pump.)
1 2-inch by 2-inch by I -inch tee, Schedule 40, IPS, PVC plastic (S x S x FIPT)
I I -inch by 4-inch Schedule 80, IPS, PVC plastic nipple (MIPT x MIPT)
bmcspec
1-inch by 1/2-inch, Schedule 40, IPS, PVC 90' ell (MIPT x MIPT)
u

Performance Curve S-Group Pumps M, 3BF, 3AB :.. High Head
METERS FEET
50
(- 160
aor
a 30
= so
20
0
40
10
■
NNN■
■■NNNME
■N�NNNN���N
I10 so,
■�Ni�N!!■■N■NBN�■■■■■■■■��■■NN■
■■■■►�■rr■...■�u.a�s��N�.Nn■■■■n
...ET..
-:..�.......N.......■.■
■■■■s■■■■■■u..:�■�r:�u�■r�■Q■■■■■■�■
■■■■n■■■■�■�■��.::
�■■
rMENI
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■�■�■■■N.■`i\\�■■■■M■.■
0 L- 0'
0
L
0
20 40 60 80
I I
10 20
CAPACITY
100 120 140 GPM
1
30 m3/h
Performance Curve S-Group Pumps 5Ai, 5BF, 5AB .. .
METERS
100
801
201
oL
If
::
250
IWA
200
�■�
�1r
� MI
rics
r.��i.
1044 �s��
f
mm�lmlw���l
hlw-A
,
�
f f
-0 50 100 150 200 250 300 GPM
0 10 20 30 40 T 50 60� �70 m3/h
CAPACITY
GOUwDS PUMPS, INC.ATER TECHNOLOGiES
SENSCA FALLS -q_w YCR.< 1314E
SPECIFICATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. PRINTED IN U.S.A.
9

360' rotation
impact sprinkler
Models 7025RD-1-1"M EFF, 7025RD-1-3/a" F EFF
7025RD-1-1'rF EFF, 7025RD-1-1 V4" F EFF
PERFORMANCE DATA*
NOZZIe Pressure (psi;
3S 40 95 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
i14 Nozzle Mi')
Flow fppm)
8.34
8.91
9.45
9.97
10.5
1C.9
11.4
11.8
122
12.6
SOKr. Base Press. 1,00
15.8
40-9
45.9
51,0
56.0
61.0
66.1
71.2
76.2
81.2
Dlam. on 1.5' Riser W.)
104
108
115
118
121
126
129
132
135
137
piam, on 6' RISer (fr.,'
112
118
123
128
132
135
139
142
145
147
Dlam. on l & Riser fft)
1 .21
127
132
137
140
144
146
tdg
150
151
016Nozzle )tri')
Flow rypm)
10.8
11.6
121
13.0
13.6
14.2
14.8
15.3
15.9
16.4
Svkr. Base Press. 10SP
36.0
41.2
46.2
51.4
56,a
61.5
66.6
71.8
768
81.9
DIarn. on 1.5' Riser oft.)
112
116
121
127
131
135
138
141
144
146
Dlam. on 6' Riser A)
120
128
133
138
142
145
147
150
153
155
Warn. on 12' Riser Kt.)
I 128
134
139
144
147
150
153
156
158
160
N18NOZZle1Ya'0 **
Flow fgprrt)
1 13.6
14.6
15.5
16.3
17.1
17,8
18.6
19.3
20.0
20.6
SDKs B71e Press. f9sr)
i 36.4
41.6
46.8
51.9
S7.0
62.2
67.3
72.4
77.5
82.6
Dlam, on 1.5' Riser fK.)
120
124
129
133
137
142
145
148
151
154
Dlam. on 6' Riser (ft.)
12?
134
139
143
147
150
153
156
15%
161
Diarrl, On 12' Riser for)
134
140
146
ISO
153
157
160
163
165
167
#20 Nozzle rir,r"?
Flow (Opm)
16.8
17.9
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
22.9
25,7
24.5
25.3
So Kr, Base press.r9sr)
37.0
-12.2
47,4
52.5
57.7
62.8
68.2
73.3
79.5
93.?
Olarn. on 1.5' Riser (ft.)
124
128
134
138
143
147
151
154
157
159
Dlam, on 6' RISer fftl
130
137
143
147
151
155
158
161
164
166
Dlam. on 12' RISer (ft.)
138
144
149
154
. 159
162
166
160
171
173
#22 Nozzle (tvv-,'
Flow f9pm)
20.2
21.6
22.9
24.1
25.3
25.4
27-S
29.5
29.6
30.5
5DKr. Base Press. fort
37.6
45.0
48.2
53.4
58.7
04.0
69.2
74.a
79.6
85.0
Diarn. on l.S' Riser fft)
127
132
137
143
147
152
135
159
162
164
DIM. on 6' Riser ffU
133
140
145
ISO
155
159
163
166
169
171
Dlam. on 12' Riser Nt)
142
148
154
159
164
167
171
173
176
178
#24 Nozzle (Ya")
;low fppfw
23.8
25.4
26.9
28.4
29.8
31.1
32.4
33.6
34.8
35.9
ipXr. Use Press. fpS1)
38.4
43.7
49.0
54.4
59,8
65.2
70.S
75.6
80.8
96.6
Warn. on 1.5' Riser M)
129
135
141
146
151
156
160
163
166
t68
:lam, on 6' Riser MW
136
1
143
US
154
159
163
167
170
173
175
11aM. on 12' Riser (ft)
146
152
158
^ 63
168
172
176
178
190
182
5iprn rcllecl ::equal test data. ?ruduc:iun nitwkIs nuv �huw slight vuriaturt.
"Slurtdard fumzle sire.
NOW Maximum streurn height is 15' V1.) MOZZIC UsirlK �hn" ! 020) NIZZIC Jt 50 Psi operating PrCa\OR.
y 71)25R EFF uax

SIZE
1.00
1.25
OD
1.315
1.660
ID
1.189
1.502
WALL
0.063
0.079
THK
E-1
FRICTION LOSS CHARACTERISTICS
PVC CLASS 200 IPS PLASTIC PIPE
(1120, 12201 SOR 21 C = 150
PSI LOSS PER 100 FEET OF PIPE IPS111001
Sizes 1" thru 5"
Flow GPM 1 thru 1200
1.50 2.00 2.50 3,00
1.900 2,375 2.875 3.500
1.720 2,149 2,601 3.166
0,090 0.113 0.137 0,167
3.50
4.00
5.00
SIZE
4,000
4.500
5.563
OD
3.620
4.072
5.033
ID
0.190
0,214
0.265
WALL
THK
Q1L
LL G?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
14
1 6
18
CJ Vj
dCL
LL
0.28
D.57
0.86
1.15
1.44
1.73
2.02
2.301
2,591
2.881
3.17
3.46
4.04
4.61
KW5 J'
� N
C/J p
0. J
0.02
0.07
0.14
0.24
0.36
0.51
0.57
0.86
1.07
1.301
1.56
1.83
2.43
3.11
`:AIB7
p N
N�
LL
0.18
0.36
0.54
0.72
0.90
1.08
1.26
1.44
1.62
1.801
1,98
2.17
2.53
2.89
3.25
� u,
N p
0. -aL
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.08
0,12
0.16
0.22
0.28
0.34
0,42
0.50
0.59
0.78
1.00
1. 4
b G1
Ga
� LJ
0.13
0.27
0.41
0.55
0.68
0.82
0.96
1.10
1.24
1.37
1.51
1.65
1.93
2.20
2.48
- H
G7 p
a ...
(TOO
0.01
0.02
0.04
0,06
0.08
0.11
0.14
0.18
0.22
0.26
0.30
0.40
0.52
0. 4
•O �
ma
> U.
0.17
0.26
0.35
0.44
0.53
0.61
0.70
0.79
0.88
0.97
1.06
1.23
1,41
1.59
� n
LA p
0. J
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.09
0.10
0.14
0.17
4
O
er�
> 0.
0,18
0.24
0.30
0.36
0.42
0,48
0.54
0.60
0.66
0.72
0.84
0.96
1.08
N p
0. J
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.07
O
LLi0.
> LL
0.24
0.28
0.32
0.36
0.40
0.44
0.48
0.56
0,65
0.73
GI
0. J
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0,01
0,01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0,03
and
> LL
0.28
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.43
0.49
0.56
L13 L7
CL ..J
0'00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
.0
and
'J LL
0.29
0.34
0.39
0.44
U7 p
0. J
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
m�
J LL
L? G
0. J
=G:
LL 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
168
1B
20
lc5:7Z4:71
3.61
1,51
2.75
0.78
1.76
0.26
1.20
0.10
0.81
0.04
0.62
0.02
0.49
0.01
0.32
0.00
20
22
'�6:34
,=5.62
3.97
1.80
3.03
0.93
1.94
0,32
1.32
0.12
0.89
0.05
0.68
0.02
0,54
0.01
0.35
0.01
22
24
`;6:60
4.34
2,12
3.30
1.09
2.12
0,37
1.44
0.15
0.97
0.06
0.74
0.03
0.59
0.02
0.38
0,01
24
26
,.�7:505
7..45
4.70
2.46
3.58
1,27
2.29
0.43
1.56
0.17
1.05
0.07
0.80
0.03
0.63
0.02
0.47
0.01
26
28
7r8:08
i 8i78
5.06
:'2'.8
3.86
1 .46
2.47
0 49
1 .68
0.19
1.13
0.07
0,87
0.04
0.68
0.02
0.45
0.01
28
30
8i55
A=9.9$
..5:42
_ 3.20
4-13
1.66
2.65
0.56
1.80
0.22
1.22
0.09
0,93
0.04
0.73
0.02
0.48
0.01
30
35Inl0:1.07y,327.
6:32
'4'c2B'
4.82
2,20
3.09
O.75
2,11
0.29
7.42
0.11
1.08
0.06
0.86
0.03
0.56.
0.01
.35
40;17"54.'1+700
5.57
r2.82.;
3.53
0.95
2.41
0.38
1.62
0.14
1.24
0.08
0.98
0.04
0.64
0.02
40
45
=?2':98
-:.
2y14
.Z:23_<5.45°;
813
;;6:78i
:`,6.20,
v 3.5.1';
3.97
1.19
2.71
0.47
1.83
0.18
1.40
0.09
1.10
0-05
0.72
0.02
45
50
+14142
25.70
9:04
<,g; 41
='6:89
=?4. 6
4.41
.44
3.01
0.57
2.03
0.22
1.55
D.11
1.23
0.06
0.60
0.02
50
55
.15187,
3066
9:941-9;83;
:7.58
1 5.09�
4.85
1.72
3.31
0.68
2.23
0.26
1.71
0.74
1.35
0.08
0.88
0.03
55
60
:17:31
'36 02
16.65
:11{55:
�8.27.
5.97,
j= 5:30
2.02'`
3.61
0.80
2.44
0,31
1.86
0.16
1.47
0.09
0.96
0.03
60
65
i8.75
t 77
4, 7
11.75
:'E3:4d:
` 8:96.:;fi.93f'
-5.74
2.35
3.92
0.93
2.64
0.36
2.02
0.19
1.59
0.10
1.04
0,04
65
70
12:65
1-537.'`;':.9.56,7.95
;1618
2.69�
4.22
1.06
2.84
❑.41
2.77
0.21
1.72
0.12
1.12
0.04
70
75
13i56
-1.7:
-10:34
=^9.03
Bi62
' 3 06
4.52
1. 1
3.05
0.46
2.33
0.24
1.84
0.14
1.20
0.05
75
80
14.-46
.19:681
c7,1c03
,1 0.18,
5.,7.f06
3,44-'
4.82
1.36
3.25
0.52
2.49
0.27
1.96
0,15
1.28
0.05
80
85
15:37
72102:
1;7.72,i:39f'75Q.3:85
y5:12
'.1`:52
3.45
0.59
2.64
0.30
2.09
0.17
1.36
0.06
85
90
16 27
24 48,
12 4
12 6fi
;T95
'4.28r
5;42
a'1.69,
3.66
0.65
2.80
0.3d
2.21
0.19
1.44
0.07
90
95
1.7.:.18
27. 6
13 1 O
.) 3 99r
„8, 39
4.7,4i
5.72
1 :87
3.86
0.72
2.95
0.37
2.33
0.21
1.53
0.08
95
100
1 :08
w:.13:79
'
=`8:83
. r..
7^"6:03
r....-.
s+F ''p
4,07
0.7
3.11
0.41
2.46
0.2
1.61
0,08
100
110
19.89
35 6
-15317-
18.36,
'-9.71
', 6.2i>
?,6.63
V1� 45.
4.47
0.94
3.42
0.49
2.70
0.211
1.77
0.1 0
110
120
2t.57a
id.60
7..309
,-J:23
'2 88;
4.88
1.11
3.73
0.58
2.95
0.33
1.93
0.12
120
t30
-16:5d
•17.97
25.0Y
:1,i:48
.8t4'
;Z.84
"3 34.
;$:29.
--1.29
4.04
0.67
3.19
0.38
2.09
0.13
130
i40
19.30
28 70
'y12;36
9'.71
''8:44
,3:84
5 59'
:-1,47:
4.35
0.77
3,44
0.43
2.25
0.75
140
150
13 5
1
-9:04
'. 4'.36�
`6 16:
1 68:
4.67
0.87
3.69
0.49
2.41
0.18
150
160
14A3
12:44
9.64
:?4:91.
6.51
�.J.89°
4.98
0.98
3.93
0.55
2.57
0.20
160
170
?5.01
13.91'
10,25
°`5:50
-6;31'
'2:71
:_ 5.29
7.10,E
4.18
0.62
2.73
0.22
170
180
15.90
15.47
_10 85
6:1,1.
=,7.32 1
%2.35;
5,;60
1.27
4.42
0.69
2.89
6.25
180
1'6.78
17i10.:11.45
';6 75.
;T;7w3'.
2.60
-;5.9�`
'1 35',
4.67
0.76
3.06
0.27
190
190
200
17:fi6
78.80'
12:06.
:'7:4
8:14
�2.85"`6:22
1.49
4.92
0.84
3.22
0.30
200
225
79:87
23.38'
13.56
11,24
9:16
3,55
` 7.00
i.85'
_':.,5.,53.'.
;1 04:
3.62
0.37
225
250
15.07
1723
10:17
4.37`
:,.7:78
2.25
6:16
1-2.7,
4.02
0.45
250
275
16:58
i3:39
11.19
5.15
8.56
2.68-
a 6176
r]5:�:
4.42
0.54
275
300
1809
-75174
12.21
'6.05
`=9.34
3.15;
;J:38:i:1-78
4.83
0.63
300
19.60
13.24l'7.01
10:1.1.
:7.99
= 5.23
0.74--1
325
325
350
14.24
P:.8.05'
;10,89'
.65-
; 4.19[
.:8 61'
,',
-_2.36-,
'. 5.63
0.84'
.950
375
75:26.
" 9.14
71'.67.
4.76:
:.,'b' 2':
1:-2:69'
-6.03
0.96,
375
400
16:28
10.30
12.45
5.37-
'r`,9.84'
3;03-
; 6.44
7.08
400
425
17:29
11.53
13.23
6.01,
10.45
�=3.39
6.84
1.21
425
450
18.31
12,81.
14.01
6 SR
11,07'-
7.24
1
450
475
19.33
14.16
14.78
7.38
.1.1.68;
.:4.16
7.65
1.48
475
15:56
8.1t
?e4.58
�8.05
1.63
500
500
550
17.12
9.68.:13.53
.12.36
:5:4&
8.85
.1.95
550
600
18.68
11.37
14.76
.6A2'
` 9,66
2.29
600
15.99
.--7.44
10.461
2.65
650
650
17.22..8,64
11'.27
3.04.
700
700
1 BA5
' 9,70
,12.07
3.46
750
750
19.68
.10.93
12.88
3.90
Boo
800
13.69
4,36
850
850
85
14.49
--4.85
900
00
15.30
5.35
950
950
16.10
5,89
1000
16.91
6.45
1050
1050
17.71
7.03
1100
105
0
18.52
7.64
1150
1150
19.32
8.26
1200
1200
Note: Shaded areas of chart indicate velocities nvPr 5' oer secnnrl Use with Cautinn. . a -
tCnnrinuedJ

I/
_.../tea
-1 . .........
,xample of different arrangements for thrust blocks.

Anchorage blocks for in -line valves.

33-46
REV. Jan. 1995
Ta%ta ias. swix ! ANAEROBIC LWOOx LIQUID FLRTILIM ,wrxtENts
urea vaaa.0
rra.asMsaazis++as+s
aosasssaa•aaiM ■s••sa�•a4•.asa�aa.w..aataa
Type of Aniiat
Aniatsl Unit
Total Anaerobic
Total Lagoon
Pt ant
Plant
Total
Ptant
Avaitadle
of Lnit
fquivalens
Lagoon Liquid
Liquid
Nutrient
Nutrient
Owtriernts
Nutrients
Preauctlan
Live Yeigftt
Capmfty,
Swvium. •••
AvaiL&bltfcy
irrigated?"
Unic "
---........4...
ft3/
per aniael
Coefficients
--------------•
Imit final leant
anicei unit
wit/year'
tba/
.
................
------------
Irrisated
Lbr*/
Lba/
enimmi
single 2-stage
acre-
"`•
acre
arse
unit/
------lba--•---
stage lot + 2nd
gals Inch
inter
Inch
year
U&M lPooder- re
30 3a
60 43 1S
191 .0070
h�
N.
.70
.93
3710
.4a
capsclty
W
.70
133
93
.66
Feeder -to der
50 221; 133
270 ZOO 70
927 .034
II
.30
136
69
2.3
Plnish h
PZW
.70
13
37
1.3
cap eaf
KM
.70
133
93
3.2
Farrawto A�
433
03 CS 215
3203 .12
N
.50
91
45
3.4
Wiwtlfl* actflre
Pew
.70
33
23
2.9
abn
K20
.7C
89
62
7.3
Farrar-ta per
SZ2
iai 523 2h0
3361 .14
N
.50
91
45
6.5
Feeder acts
P205
.70
35
25
3.3
tf i+•,
x=
.70
a9
62
a -a
Faremr-to pjtr
T417
Zl= 2123 708
10473 .39
N
.SO
136
68
26
Flniah act,
P20
.70
53
37
14
34M
1t?0
.70
133
93
36
• Roferammi Copts ef'gfologfilt
end Agticuiturat Er+giii«rirp; Animdl Scfines; 40rt!5 Caroling hate University;'Jan 1990
.. • . . - Agr=mC
cifyisiap, North Caroline 04OW-UNnt of Aprieieiiurt
•• Assuan M0 -1b saw and boar:,ah Limited food, 3-rlt old waarslfng,
SO -Lb feedar pig, 220-tb'iertitot hog and 20 pugs/saw/Year
•" Lrstionted total Laga m liquid includes total liquid manure pins
average annual rsinfalt"surpl,m Incidentst to
lagaan
surface, oboe not account for saepsgs.
"'• Irrigated: sprinkler irrigat✓rd liquid wmrmored for 1 wrrth or
longer.
;
Tabu a 18C. LAW APPLICATION Of Si1I NN AaAF. M i C LAt;OCN L I oil l0 •
Type of Mimi Rate-
Lagoon Liquid Application Rate ••
rsinfmus Land Area for Liquid Appkic;tian
of tk►it Limiting
-..--..-----------irrigated------------------
.................... frrfgated-.................
Preouetian MUCH wit
---------------- UW8ere/year----------------
.................. Las/acra/yesr................
Unit N
Sa too ISO 200 Leo 300 350
40
50 IN 130 ZOO 230 300
330 400
P20J
20 .4ci 60 sa 100 -120 IQ
160
20 40 60 s0 loci iZO
140 160
` 9=
SO 100 ISO 200 no 300 330
400
50 100 130 20O 2S0 300
350 400
............... ---------------••-..-----.,..----------------•---------------------------.............-.....•---.-...--_._....
i.................
fncha/Year........ ........
........-.......acres/aninaL unit ..............
WomiIMe- to p♦r N
.73 1.3 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.4 5.1
5.9 '.CM
.000 M32 .0024 .0019 .0014
.0014 .0012
Feeder heed PZOS
.54 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.7 3.2 La
4.3
.013 .0065..0043 .= ,OOZE .0022
.0019 .0016
eapasily r20
.54 1.1 1.4 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.7
4.3
.013 .0066 .00" .0033 .00ZE .0022
.0019 .0016
Feeder -to pr,r N
.73 1.5 2.2 I.9 3.7 4.4 5.1
1.9
'-:UT .OZ3 .016 .012 .oM .=73
.am6 .ama
finish haid P205
.54 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.4
4.3
.00 .032 .421 .016 .013 .011
.0090 .0079
capeefgy t20
.54 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.7
4.3
4" .032 .021 .016 .913 .011
.0091 .0080
i
farrow-ta • per N
1.1 1.2. 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 7.7
a.a
.11 .054 .036 .027 .027 .018
.011 .013
ltaenlfnp active P203
.81 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.3 i.9 3.7
6.5
.15 .073 .049 .036 .029 .024
.921 .016
sew R20
.30 1.6 I.4 3.2 4.0 4.3 5.6
6.L
.15 .073 .349 .037 .029 .924
.021 .013
Farrow to Air N
1.1 �.2 3.3 4.4 S.S 6.6 7.7
3.5
.13 .065 .743 .032 .026 .M
.018 .016
Feeder active P2M
.al 1.4 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.9 5.7
6.5
.19 -ode .039 -0" .033 .029
.W -OZZ
seir I=
.30 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8 5.6
6.4.
.18 .OU .059 O&L .033 .029
.M .aZ2
i
larrov. to poi' it
.73 1.5 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.4 1.1
5.9
.53 .Zb .18 .13 .71 .084
.M .066
Ffnisn activ* PM
.54 1.- % A 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.8
4.3
.72 .36 .24 .1a .IL .12
.10 .Oa9
sole r2o
.st 1.f 1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.7
4.3
.72 .34 .24 .18 .14 .12
.10 .090
..vrsss�asas�a..x..�a.a.aas�.........r�,....+.�a.•
• Aefarenne ..f0e0ta of
Bfoiogicat 3 Agrimittural Engimmring. Soil
Science,
crop Science; North Carelins St Univ;
Jab 1;
" N fertilization rare
should Ze consistent with realistic crap yield.
m Leacming knd eanitrification
r
and P205 sail fasaabitfzation unaccounted for.
_

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
Barber McLamb Farm
6812 Elevation Rd
Benson NC 27504
Attn: David McLamb
IT1 llkq'�WA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510065
Additional Information Request
Barber McLamb Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear David McLamb:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by August 10, 2000:
1. You have requested that your facility be permitted for 600 Feeder to Finish swine. Your lagoon appears
adequate and your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed for 600 Feeder to Finish. However,
the certification for this facility is only for 543 Feeder to Finish. Please have a technical specialist re -certify
your facility for the number of animals you would like permitted. I have enclosed a blank certification for
your convenience. Please submit three completed copies.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in triplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before August 10, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
incerely,
J�
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Chris Smith, Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Pw Q eew y
Animal Wdste Management Plan Certification R
Farm Location: County Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude: _/ —29� Integrator: ���
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specifi �.road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
T;vpe of Stivine
D Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
rt Farrow to Wean
t Farrow to Feeder
J Farrow to Finish
D Gilts
* Boars
No. of Animals
Type of Poultry
D Layer
ZI Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle
J Dairy
D Beef
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or O (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
************************************************************************************
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title upttsfer. , ,
Name of Land Owner:.. c
C
Signature: %1# Date• 7
Name of Manager ' i erent from o er):-1d a e-74,.
Signature: ate: —41-60
AWC -- August 1 997 1,

OnIYA +�
Technical Specialist Certification
61.As:a iec�tnical s cialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
i. ty �. 1�
�N(fiA64 .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management'
plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
AC 2H.0217 and the
1"t��Northf Carolior e
natSoiil ed and Watn ISA er Conservation Commission pursuant oe15Aces NCACs?H.0217 aon nd 15A rvice NCAC 6F 0001-
' .0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
H. Certification of Design
A} Collection. Storage, Treatment System
Cheek the appropriate box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity,
requirements.
storage capability consistent with waste utilization
D New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications: j
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �/'lt r'S •� Jai
Affiliation at Work Completed:
Address (Agek!2�
! Phone No.:,Signature: Dater
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers): adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 'S L -(/ .J�✓ / /!-�
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Aaenc r' �$ dr Phone No.:.
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check tJre propriate box .
Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP. or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
D Facilily with exterior lots (RC)
Ihlethods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):,N!/^++ L, l/�1r
Affiliation '-5 D
aWrk Completed:
Address (AQen 4 r. e J�r�: r Phone No.: -.3
Signature: ' Date: 7 12 2 0O
AWC -- August 1, 1997 2
i�_3

D). Application and Handlink Equipment
Check the appropriate box
;Rl Existine or expanding facility wiLb existing waste appligalion eqUinMent (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specifies) in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able'to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
Z) New, expanded. oLexitang facility wiLhout existing_waste api2ligation a Ui=ent for spMy irrigatign., (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of the plan).
w, expanded. or existing facility Lvithogl eSisting. a+ r ' n o
spray i 'anon. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). ll �h j
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): e P 4Tlhed CZ
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and EmerQencv Action Plan (SD
SI. WLTP RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency At"' }t Plan are cornylete and cane mplemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prin
Affiliation(° _'S___
Address (Age
Signature:„
Work Completed:=
i� Phone No.:. 6
-143
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block Is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by cenified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:_ _ Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 3

A
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): --
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
._ The cropping system is in place -on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Q Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ' `.5 LC/ J
Affiliation 5 Date Work Completed: 16 8
Address (AgenO.' Phone No.:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional. approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 4

Y C) Runoff Controls from 1r xterior Lots (RC)
- FaciIity with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, o certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling, Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block -
Anima
J l waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in die plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plait.
�.i Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Se-r_ 5�e-e-J
iF
-- Affiliation Date Work. Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: 'Date: -
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to _purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Fame of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, Sis WUP, RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan, hp also been installed and)Voperational.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print):
Address (,
Signature:
Date Work Completed:
1 iC Phone No.:
Date: irJ
AWC --. August I, 1997 5

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-OS35
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
0
AWC -- august 1, 1997 6

C.
Cem
8 0 [ I'• = i '��Q a ti'
• II ll
221
•.� ram..._ . \ I II ' i - ff r'�
C\/ � ..�... /�' if \\\\\� �\ � � . 1 : ��' ,�J� .` . �\ f `I #� � � �19 % •Benson '
n I 1 �� 1 �� �`, . 1 r • ` L Ch
Cep
381
� - 'J �- - .`�'•`. \� 1•� �,� r �i. 1 M , � Gem,'
�,- [evens �' � �' p. ,• �y .J �, �.
Ifs _ �/`� �' •{•'
CP
41dis
}}� l � � _ _ i II ' J �.% '.'I',r Gelih� O � ',� 1.�� •4,'t .`. \� .li�-`_••, _-
� %� 11 . • �•1 ` �� — '\ , "�� � Packs � J
700
` � ��'f``\J�!�\��,li •
306
' /_• . ,rt.� \ ,, � � Ireem
r ti ��/;, •�� Ple •ant
I
cp
u • '' ~' �� , - ��� _'�'' �'_ _ ' Cam'%. ' � � � -
Ic
!I- -�Iy.t Cable
• o �',. ___._ `- `____ c. .�� it
306

_• . IWO. APR .�- 2.1997 -
Ronald. E., Sneed, Ph.D:, P E., C:I.D:
3405 ,Malibu Drive
Raleigh, NC, 27667-6505' "
Phone: [phone] -- Fax: 919/782=7867.
April 21 1997;
Mr. ' Kenneth York, District Conservationist ;
NRCS-USDA
County Office Building
806 North Street
Smithfield; NC 27577-9998
Dear.Mr. York -
This is to certify that the land application irrigation system for swine wastewater has.
been installed on the Faye' B. McLamb Farm, Tracts 2849, 4056..and 2850; NC ;
Highway 50, Johnston County, operated by Mr. John. Langdon has been installed
according .to, NRCS-USDA Standards and Specifications. .There area couple of
r or•items that need to be completed and these were discussed with Mr. Langdon
oh.Friday, April`l8;-1997. Risers'need to be firmly attached to the riser supports and
further.' compaction of soil around -the risers and along the trenches need. to occur:
Several,risers:need'to be straightened to have the sprinklers plumb with the ground.
Two sprinklers had to be -relocated during construction due.to.being,too..close-to.a;
water well.' One sprinkler shown on the plan'was not -installed since it was too close
-to a building; but two additional full' circle sprinklers were installed, which actually'
: increases irrigated acreage.by 0.15 acre.
Equipment, for .this job was supplied by Toni Crockett. Irrigation Company;
Williaimton, NC; electrical work and wiring .the. pump was handled by Kan-Duit;
Aulander; NC; _and. equipment installation was done by Mr. John Langdori and his
work crew.
I have enclosed a certified; sealed copy of the certification form. Call me if there are
questions.
Sincerely,
Ronald E, .Sneed Ph.D., P:E., C.I.D.
RES:sws
Enclosures
Consulting Engineer -- Irrigation Design, Wastewater Management, Environmental Policies and Regulations

f 0 L4
Handliop nt
r appropriate box
rJ Exi�jng facility with existing was nl:j�ation equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plant at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
x+xzxx�raoxt�i�l�fitaili tDitexisting faci ily without existing waste annlic ilk{ cQuinrnen1 (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Spettalist (Please Print):
Affiliation: Self -Employed
Addre4(Agency): 3405 Malibu Drivet Raleigh, NC Phone No.: 91 a4282-78,57
27607-6505
Signatire: _ _Date:s&atpmher 12, 19S
i
III. Certhficatidn of Installation
A) Cojeetion. Store st-olintion
New,,,,exnand I_or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been inst led in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofils, no certification is necessary.
i
Name;of Technical Splcialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Addreis(Agency): Phone No.:
Signatiire: Date:
AWC Apr it 24, 1996

40
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with -exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and HandlingYguipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third patty application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Z) Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): jhe�
Affiliation: _ s�-i� iyt�o�-y f
Address(Agency):
Signature:
C 274 07 Phone No.:..9W ,7SZ-
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in I
above has been checked.
q
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and hand] t u
4. :
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delive-q- `4
,
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditl+ 19eitt..
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management pla"tva ill
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date: fiN `r
Name of 1lianager(if different from owner): �1?11 !till
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control Insect Control and Mortality Management SD SI WUP RC or 11
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(AQency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
A«'C -- January I. 1997 5

off too
vain,
MIR
.................
- vyuy�m
OWN, q
RECEIVED
W ATER qUkjTystCTjON j,
7i,
..........
M-AY 3 1 '.2600
wha,
7.
-7
glvg
. . . . ......
4%.j. -P
u 4e V"
CO.
I Y,
50L
L7&1

. . . I ,-.O, " . - . . ' ' . I I . -- I - ----.- ...-.. .:�' . --- 1. - ... - ---:-�'-.--' - - . -.' - - . - - -
I I .1 . I — I . —
I . I . ; . I . '. . - - - , - ' .' ' -: 1. . .. . I., ...._. .1. I — —
. . I / � .. - - . . . I ' . I - . I — .i. � . . ' t.-- . -.- - . - , : -., % - . : , , � . --- - �- -'Z-'--'-----Il .-"-I---
. . I ,'� 1;' . I .-- , � ' . . I ,
. , . � � I - "-' � '-. - � .I I I . I.., '. .' . 1. :
' i . , , " ' 7-
��%-'- - ' i. ' "':' - . . . .
. . - r ! - / . " I . .' ....: .- " I I ' ' t .
- . - . �
. � , ..-.. , � � . . ",
I . ;l I , I , ' ,
'� . % - , . . : , Ll . . . - , 1. I . '-'. : '. " - '
y..
. . 4i"I .4 O-L-�� -- -- 1 4 . I � - -.; � , . -.'... :xf'
t ; Z
� ' -
' _ � { a P � #Cni7 -i,L a i' O 1 i<, _ F . t _ sr
+-��_�- ='- iSe._"-s.=�_�= _ s - - J1 - .. i, •.K fir.:.
_ .__—.y.4:,.�«��_•�-.,:r__ �_.z �r = :" '•�R�•-'ter _sy r�i'
- M : f, �+ , r` s-
y j/ r_
'ti" I K _ v . A_ r C �_ ,Q,Q C: +rj n p ./� ti L.
I . I � . . - � - . , � " , I 1� - � . ' . I � . . " L 'e . ' I �' -� :.L � ,
.. .' ,
----A�_'- ' . . .
' - ' '- . r., , . I A-1 �.-` ' - , :' - - I r . . . .. I
' I .
m - , L ---, -,-. - , -
' L - . . , , .
. - ' '�' - -
- I ' . .. L I - . I � v I - .. - - " . . . - 7 , � ' .
. � ; L
, , - 'r: � - .-. ,."--, "� �
. I I . I - . L
I .. , � ..' I � 11 .. I t.�' , el'i..":: -';,111.1�' " . , .1 � ..' , - " . �L� _ . . . ! . . . , . . L �' I . - TT--. -� I -
. - I . � : � . _
� I . , . . ' . . . . , . . . t. I � - �' I . . . -- ---- - , x�
� . I L . -
" L, . . � � . �
- " . I . . . . - - L I .7� � '. ., ,.e. ',.;, ,.l. , - I L L. . , � I . . - , -� , , ,,- :��'. , .- � , iir-2�
11
'' 3fY��, I'Lr it ',"f' .t .5� • y _ /. Y' _ i�• r}-�' - t k,r -
f_'Y _/ -,i' >- ",,� . 3 ...- r - ray
k.
h / arm Pl +4. �Jr'; i !. �Jl" -rj� -. J. - - _ .< .. -- e?"
. �. . . . � .. I-. � L � , .I . . , � -.I . I . L- . I. .- .� . .-.. .. . .- ;.. .i I 1I... .I � �: '*' � .'" I �,.�� . .- -I.-� � I. . r I. . -� .,, � L-A..I� I,I . .., I .� �-.. I ,'-.. . .. � ,- I .I . v .-., .. -. .L I. 1m. 1. . ., ... 1) . . I .0 1;L ..,1 �. �IVI . .. ,�.� �r.Vl.. v . �'' , 2. IL )w'..,I. IL;��7 -A"a ' . L ,I�, , .'-� I., '-',A � ": . 'IllI-V.#-.� �I'.�I.
. ', �-I-'- . .". I -'I. .. .-. - � . "- .-I .'�— . .� - I' ', :r.,..I . , �� ..� 'L I .L.. . ' 'I. - .,- .� I L -.,, . �',- ..- '' �_-:.. ' .. ' ' - _..,,,- L '.. _'.- �L.'.--
." I. "-�� ..,-V�-1qi::I--L,-­'.p ''.''-' --.- �-_�--, - !...'--"'� ;'1f.,,--,,...' , ,'-. ._.�,,-1-L ..1-, '--,e I1 "'L�-.;- --"'"-n
: ,,-:�*'.-�,I -. ."LL ."�
'.1-,' .`�. 3
-.-- ��.�.- -. .' _I", .,..- . � -I,I..c t. ,--�
r . '.L - -- I ' :.,. .- .�— - �I .I -. .-1. " I --. ..,...
I . ..-. .
-', .
'-�I:� I7'� ''-"�: '-�- ­.-��n-� I.--�- --,'---�
;�-�­....�
{ �."��',,i t67'-.r"-%-.,-' .-,:�. r'-.'..�. ��-'�,"I-�7'". .'i, - .1�,-,'.. �,:�-�-e'�;,,-�V� ;�,L -".f
4, . --.�-..,:'.�.-. .- ". !. 4:,-,'", � ",4 - .".LL . -I ---�"'L'-�'�� '.. :i- , -..;�'-.-,,. -'' ,>���4.-.. �..tt-�-. .-I. '; "z. .. � ",,.'1. ",. .L:.:"'4e . "1.1'. t. '..-'".,:', ;. -,�.-- I�. .I , .'-.,'-:. :L �..I . L.LL' -.. . I.' -.. '-I_., , . �'. .....n.;'�.'a c'.,.....r.,".I I,..l.'I I., -.� "-�.L..t-- �. " ":�.,,''.� -��,r';',L-:L�_,-:-- . -. ''_I -1,1'.._ I,:.. , �."1-.. ... - ?..'55 -. .�r '.:- . -.,�C _.., --�._ ,---'-..;".
-I�I"I - -m .� , .
. L-��Li-..I..L-. .I.I- I . ': r .''�.-'. .'� .,4-IL�,I- -.. ;-r
.-..I : . ,-. ,. ,.. A . -I. ..-,.� .. . I . -L� �.... ..LI - dL :. . ��L,I. I- . -" . ,. L I . r . -,. ' .,. . I.--.
' - .-L-I:L-,. .V '1I11.. '- .-� -.�;' I:'&
I .- I . I .
r.�...', .i-
'�----"-:; � . -�'''-�' �I%r,;­
�'.-.:
..�. ..:�. . - .-I '-L:..I. .Il -I ',.
-'.-
�� :� S1i 4ii �i`✓' r J ✓ a 't�y ,1I�,4-. ."r ;I,- ' .
/�( 7�5 _ t --':�---�i- �'-
" .- �"�L.---.'-
3�,,'.i1 ...vI,,- ,;'.-1:"'�. 0'..A '.I.-..� '" . �A-a ' -� ',I.I .�.� ,, . —Lr� :. �.' .- . i I, , ,L,:". ' - .-- .�:- -... 0I :.f- ... :7.�IIA...�..`�' I ,Nr.L _ , �L, � .."� .- .
':L_.. -', :II. .'.�1.� '.-...'..... ', ". ' '_..-'rI:� :. .r . ...'L�: ,., �-_-.- . '. . I '�', .-" ;; ..i.2'., , . -.: . '� ...-I;�� ._ r L, , ":. �'�.�'.. -,-,,..''-r: .I-r._-_. I,4I--� . L . 1r-; .-",:,;.: ,�1. ; L- .- ' � �. -..-- �I.�. . -.,- �'. ,': I,�%. .. , .�.�-" -:�-:,".�-.'�.�,--;5. -. ,-L:�.,-''� 'l - ---­' �; '.-
- ''::I-�
,1�%'I.-.'3�-..—:;:�- -��.' '-����-:L :�',
"..'�4m
1LL1."7'1I I ''. .-
',. i�l4 -�.I7%-,�f- ..-I"� - II' *-,
-. -- '' �.'.I'. �. ,0-..- .�� . ,,, .: .
,� ,�.L :.
­, � ' . , . � I' LL .
..L
- . . -. . !' _... --I ..- Li ." - Y..- .-Iz "�
-�'I" 1
r"
. 4 S S .�ti_A�--_ram S
�.!�L-
IP" ',.-.-Z--
t 1i�Z.�
i
�/O
�}
L l • 'ter
-_--T. _ 1 /�y
�� S
i?I Jf� / /y
i '"`
. _ _ ti- Y 3 r y_ , / is
, [ u. y._t`Y� i,:.�{"✓ _ rn.; s..'` i:3-art -�'`:
11
.
- w+...-ice++�.
-
LA
.� - - - - - -
. - s > - I
... . . .. -r ...... �1. •. • - . . ...,. ..