510063_PERMIT FILE_20171231

i ype of visit: v t-ompuance inspection v uperanon rceview W structure cvaivanon u recnnicai Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 9Tmergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1.21al( 1�6 I Arrival Time: Q Departure Time: County: _1TA h Region:�
Farm Dame: T f Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _Aj(r Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes EoNo DNA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
• d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili 'Number: 51 - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ® Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
tKI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes S No [:]NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ml NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'fiZ No ❑ NA EN NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[;a NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CaNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
N
Required Records _& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Who
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
®NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other-
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA 10 NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes [:]No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - b3 7 jDateof1nspection:q[.)I11%
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA �] NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA JX_] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA [4 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
8�f ✓ c�v,y cork aft H7// i r ane- Fl d &xt . �etm { ee 4-h' s h e � I0 a bo�- � s � it cl7�1 f'�� h ,
Heavy r Q�q d �o `Palm G C t� rOl�c�� �c� V W i 7 S 'l 5�21 y (�?q
Payb#e4 is
(4S) �o
CuA15 borwi dt tS' Vvdl �C+�e1 ©A A
ReviewerllnspectorName: V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Ll
e- (? OJT
Phone: �I R� 7q1-LID V
Date: �] Q
21412015

ITvpe of Visit: CJ ComDliance Inspection O Oneration Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance w . .
for Visit: d Routine
Referral
Date of Visit: 'i Arrival Time: t: S Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: t� a-v l o f`v`-I giu f V � Owner Email:
Owner Name: 60-0 %'� d eve(` Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C_ ttv11- �fL�,�-Z t�' CLL' Title:
Onsite Representative: l
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Access
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
h
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
La er
Design
Capacity
Current
PoWtco)Feeder
Design
Dai Cow
Current
er
rFarrow
Non -La er
Dai Calf
sh
an
der
Farrow to Finish
'�( 3 ('
D P.oultr,
Layers
Dign
C•.a acit
Current
P,o
Dai Heifer
D Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Cats
Non -La ers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Feeder
I Beef Brood Cow
Boars I
Other
Other I
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ©� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [g-IA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �IA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
C3 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[allo
DNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - i Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [D-Na— ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No � ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):%
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[q-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[Z11frio
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑moo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
®-N'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑moo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ✓u, S ( D xf .-[cy C: ,,--t-Z,-
13. Soil Type(s): G }al��l'`�►n'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [[ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Eg"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Dd-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑t 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes E3"<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [7 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E] No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �N
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: r 7
24, I?id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes C3 Igo' ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Callo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:[,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 Yes [D-No [DNA ❑ NE
[:)Yes [D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [s3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
C3-N-o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
CJ�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Conintents{refer_ to question #):`Explam.any:YES answers and/or any,additional;recominendations,of any other cominents "" '.
Llse drawings,of facility, to:better:explein,situ`ations-(u additional
-- se; additiona,
17 0- 5 $ P 3,
cry( Co., 3C► $ - psl
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu
Page 3 of 3
Phonel �_­ k,33_ Kj s 3 `j
Date: ry r}, ,Stit
21412015

S UrvS
Type of Visit: (v>Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I M; qO Departure Time: County `lVS vt Region:k2O
Farm Name:
fC2�J`t
a—�Wt"�
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
r
of sJ�•�
edr
�..
«
Phone:01
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
o tea
s�
Facility Contact: &V
S
ee4-,utr Title:
Phone: O -.
CD
Onsite Representative:
_ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
�fY 1
p
Certification.Number: ��0
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
'Design Current
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
iVet Poultry
EgDesign
pacity
Pop.
Cattle C*apacity
Pop.
Finish
La er
Dair Cow
Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
o Finish
3t"
Dai Heifer
o Weanesign
Current
D Cow
o Feeder
r
llr, P.oultrr;C•a
acit
P,o .
Non-Dairo
Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
OW—th"e"
Turkey Poults
NJ Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2f NA 0 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

JEacility Number: jDate of Inspection: O ,rc
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[ TTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
,�A
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): --
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[]]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ON o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[ "No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
E3<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2-1�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift [3 C7Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): 8G-+�' /�G0. -56 D M; Ile?" Sze
13. Soil Type(s): _..,,_.—..'� ✓%`�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes h10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements
[:]Yes ©.Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[::]Yes FZ 1Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
1
❑ Yes ❑.Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []joiGb ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑/ /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IE o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking [:]Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Ea *`No ❑ NA 0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 1_1�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 16
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10<0
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2"No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E3"<o
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes EE�No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
36. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [;�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [arIfo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [;�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 5?(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
19%.4 C? — 1.3 4
Clio-, - b8 s
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:I/Or' 33-3
Date: 1
21412015

Type of Visit: Routine
[lance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4 Arrival Time:172
Farm Name: �Q. C.-d
Owner Name: I -) ®rs,•
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Departure Time: County Regian:1
Facility Contact: i Title:
Onsite Representative: ✓�
Owner Email: Z.
r�
Phone: rn
x
Integrator:
Phone:' ui
v
^^ __=A
Certified Operator: Certification Number: a n(T
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current Design Current Design C*urr.ent
Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
on -Layer
Dairy Calf
Design Current
Dr. Pou[tr. Ca act P■o P.
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
keys
Uther Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �� ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes [] No D-MA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [2-NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑'90
❑ Yes ff No
[EIINA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

FaciliNumber: C- Date of Inspection: bl
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [?-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No IR'15'A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[2rfio
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
E!Jlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E315o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes
[f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ ONZ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence M t"t! ence of Wind fDr/i�ft ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 3-e�r,�e,�rJ , b 6 0 e-t
13. Soil Type(s): L 2xvao
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [:)Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [:]Yes I_J A"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Ej 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes C -,K ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [B-ND
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

acilit• Number: n I - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes DO
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes I a
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes C:fNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes ETNo
Other Issues
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�o
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[ o
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
Ea No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yes
Q No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[i]'No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
[] Yes
ff No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
ZINO
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA [] NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES 'answers'and/or any additionai,recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
5 (Ac � - q-646 - 0 , �r-7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
D-4 3 -3
r
Date:
M-
21412

J
_ alit OVs 34115-
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: �utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I &"'d + A Departure Time: 1 v County: Region:/V�
Farm Name: ��' s� i� Owner Email:rn
E
Owner Name: Phone: t ;
Mailing Address: MAR 2 5 2015
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: c4'4:zj r&_..ate Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: C Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: I
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Deslgn Current
Swine Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Wet Poultry
Layer
Non -La er
Deslgn
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish 1 �p D
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
D . P,oulte.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design
Ca aci
Current
Po ,
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes [G]•N_❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
I_]lTA'
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
E3.NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [D'<A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
1
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Condmued

Facili Number: jDate of Ins ection: r,-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q-KX' ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[g-Nrr
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[J�
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ELNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): - �G�e �1 T s G O 1K,
[(,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ frorYthose designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ff r Imo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ±tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ZLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 6 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [D.X6
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [E' o
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
[Z[,N6
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes
[g-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [3'1Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []a>d- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[. fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[._jXo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments(refer'to;gaestion #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or:any other cotnments°�.r
Use:drawin s.of facili ,to:better.'ex lain W6ations use'additional a es"as neeessar ' ." `gt
t q6�c,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q 3 3 3�
Date: ny" 1-5
21412011

I
Type of Visit: P C mpliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visil. Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: r County: A Regioaca
Farm Name: DA-11 t i ' A rY W P c-t ►l v,. a i; L^,o Fn Cvv-Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
1
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: 1 /tD lar? O
Certification Number: 7 7 U Ix 010
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Ur P,oultr.
Ca aci
P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
I Beef Feeder
I Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes Y�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? /r
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Ins eetion:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes )EINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No F] NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �3 ,� �3
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes ,eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes X5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes J5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[] Yes
4 No
❑ NA
[] NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes J2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ;yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29: At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes )n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes RlJo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes jZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes EI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes .CJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
&"4 qgftj`I,
3���
C : "'t $ to -31 y S°1d
-t3
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 f 21412011

Vi s-Tow o�_ LofiT6�_ G�
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: LRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IMP, Arrival Time: Departure Time: County Region6e_L
Farm Name:
Owner Name: J
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: lQ r\ Het`f t'na
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: LC C-Ar, qj
Certification Number: 97 O S ao
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current Design
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry C*apacity Pop. C«attle Capacity
Layer Dairy Cow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current Dry Cow
Dry P,oultr, C•_a aci P.o , Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: [3 Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .E jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes -eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili umber: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Eno
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ''No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
5�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] Yes LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [/"No
❑ NA
E] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ,To
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes 2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
T
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes [XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes 2�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZjNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? []Yes ;a No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes P/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

]Facility umber: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facil' fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aoia
25. Is the facili y ou o compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. a O 19, CL«�
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes gfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo
[—]Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Rj No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
mens.(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommends_ tions or any other comments �._
ffseerdraw'ings
of facility to'better ex lain'situat ons use additional ages as necessa
s
� �� S 09�a y 5 3
I— LA ( rue
.0.1 A � �'*
it
k 9V�
Lb boot -
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: CtM q� ( �a36
Date: J013113
21412011

Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County436bn,5.-LQAJ Region: �
T
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner [dame:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: r f '
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: PI-dSin [Le_
Certification Number: 9 G a
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design C►urrent
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pap.
Cattle Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr> P,oultr,
Ca xci
P,o ,
Non-Dair
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes _No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ,2r�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

�F\
Facilit Number: - Date of Ins ection-
T
Waste Collection &Treatment
m
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storstorage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes _2N
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Z"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes J?7rTq0
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
D NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility tail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
ONE
[:]Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP [—]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. J'D Yes No
aoi 1 et 1.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VNo
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility umber: - Date of Inspection:
24 Did the facilly fail to calibrate ste application equipment as required by the permit?
a 0 1 0 'L", AA
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of comAidnce with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes,.�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. of 01 0 (E, 5 i Q LTZ
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
53 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
C24o
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal`?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0"'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
2fNo
0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other.comments.
Use drawings of facility to betterexplain"situations-(use:additional pages. as necessary)
U,ew
i 1 1Q IND
�6070
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: [phone]
Date:
21412011

Date of Visit: Arrival Time: t Departure Time: County: �Qhj A)Region:
Farm Name: 6- �� e C tA$ S A), � FaC M Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Nei r � Cl i S �„f�„ Certification Number: 0(J } r6��o
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
C►►opacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
an toFinish
La er
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
an to Feeder
E
Non -La er
der to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P.oultr C+.a acit P.o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 51
- Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1
Identifier:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes U7rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ,0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ZYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,E!fNo ❑ NA [] NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes f2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections []Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Condnued

' Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. i the f cility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. [s Jcity�t of com 11$ ce�virth p� it conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes
the appropriate box(es) below. I I j 1 o 1 10
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
R1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
;2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer -to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments , iPP. f "
Use. drawings: of facility to better. explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
a l ti b6~c-�Cot�J (eve go lI I <L 'J�� a;p& �'_
�a a 31 a 3 6 3 `� ILq)doI
©� d,_,Q a©II
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �J
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit QS Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit �6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: J Arrival Time: ! Departure Time: County: �CO Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = 1 = f1 Longitude: = o = d
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity
Population
Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
❑ Feeder to Finish
Dry Poultry
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑Non -La Non -Layers
ElPullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Beef Stocker
ElBeef Feeder
El Beef Brood Co
Gilts
POBoars
Other
El urkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /No Cl NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 115 — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
0'*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
E•t��.�.i .: z ; s.. ...�. a . _ � � �:S .a. of • 8�8 ..:., �.�'�
�Comme ntsT(refer-.,taquestiont#) tExplatn,any�YES'answers and/or any recommendationsFor(any other comments�g'
'Use#drawtngs cif facility to better explain situattansi (usei.aiddrttonal pages`as necessary) x r } t
s z� x
Reviewerllns ectorName 1` <� ray �: Phone: 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 ' Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 1.711 fy
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp 0 Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑Yes�No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes r" "v ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes (((b(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
i
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 4 o
❑ Yes [ 1V o
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes &o
❑ Yes [# No
❑ Yes 16 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Or
UJm r yy
0•9
5,�1-04 S

Type of Visit pj Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
N
Farm Name: 69` 4 &A i _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator: _
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = d = Longitude: 0 0 ❑ 1 = !{
Design C• rent
Design Current
Poultry CapaclaFinish
11
Design Current
�W'.et
❑ La er
❑ DairyCow
Feeder
❑Nan -La er
❑ DairyCalf
❑ Feeder to Finish
t
Dr. Poult
❑ Layers
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stacker
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
ElBeef Feeder
ElPullets
POBoLrs
El Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
❑ Turkeys
Other El -urkcy Poults
❑ Other El Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
1.Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA [:]NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
yj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[:9'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�INo ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes / �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [IYes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
;4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
o
❑NA
❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
,questioi
- +I:l-
Reviewer/inspector Name �1 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 6
Page 2 of 3 I2128104 Continued

Facility Number: 51 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents /
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El�,
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps (I Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes Rio
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 12/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25•
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ET'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes J'No ❑ NA [IN E
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
21'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30• At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
�,/
L�J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
//
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
�(
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional. Comments andLorDrawin
r b. I, riZ.t�? -W'F*' q3� S i -✓i4 �. y� - v�c�p �� � 4�Y.`%Y£.�`3f ifx
m5
w I
�(D
to
©
.$
Le� 1
�-
r
tv .SS Iolal dog
Mf.i r-1131I01
^' k,b s1a3lo�
Page 3 of 3 12128104

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510063 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510063 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: QgMglianoe Inspection, Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 06/12/2008 Entry Time:09100 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: David G. Herring Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: David G Herrina
I��rItIrII��L56I•�'
Mailing Address: PO Box 9 Newton Grove NC 28366
Physical Address:
Facility Status: '❑ Compliant E Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
1 mile down 1002 east off of 701 north of Newton Grove
Integrator: Gis
Latitude:35°17'32" - Longitude:78°20'56"
Question Areas:
W Waste Application Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Henry Elias Faison Operator Certification Number: 24806
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Henry Faison Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Jane Bernard Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Over application on Field 1-A 12/10/07 14257 gal applied-4hour run at 120 gpm
Waste analysis for SG was not taken
1 in rainfall inspection missing
120 minute inspections missing
See violation letter for further details.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Feeder 625 629
Total Design Capacity: 625
Total SSLW: 326,250
tar. -..a., ea�....a.. �....
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1
Page: 2

Permit: AW5510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number: 510063
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload?
■
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
120 Minute inspections?
■
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis? ■
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ Q ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510063 Owner -Facility: David G Herring Facility Number: 510063
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

L
f Visitampllance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
n for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: '�rrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region-
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: d S2 ZA 0—
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =1 0 0 I = 11 Longitude: 0 ° = d 0 «
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry
Design C►urrent
Opacity Population
Design Current
Cattle Can acity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Dry Poultry
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers
❑ Gilts ❑Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ TurkeyPoults
❑ Other ❑ Other
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
I
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes X-1
0ElNA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes)2YN'o
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes I�'N0
El NA
[I NE
El Waste Application [3 Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers/ ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes (6No
[I NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ` [;K4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes flNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ,TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes,ZNo ❑ ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Ye No NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Ye �No ❑ NA NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? es � o El NA El33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additio. ...nal Comments and/.or Drawings:"...
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: r
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑, ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes12/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,,ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, 1s there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 4K Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding Hydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes X,1 No
❑ NA
❑ NI?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes M'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes E[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 0<
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 0/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (referto�..queshon_#) ,Explain any YFSanswei•s And/or any recommendahans or any other�c�mtnents. .
Use drawings�of�facility�to better�explam sttivahons(use,addiiiona[�'pa`ges)as,�necessary): �.
v�eA V 1 e. d /POP,? 9 TLA
Lo aj- I S O .= C!
q M
T
Reviewer/[ nspecto r Name I Y Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
A
Page 2 of 3 1 12.128104 Continued

♦_. _.
Type of Visit .2rco,mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit so KCoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Ot rrival Time: II..� Departure Time: County: SO hfIS+OA/ Region
-s 4
Farm Name: i 'a tr 141!rL(11a 54 17i'A ��C m Owner Email:
Owner Name: C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: J- P o f^Y 'n Iso n)
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: a y '� d �.
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = c = ' = Longitude:
Design
Current
Design
Current
llesign Current
Swine
Capacity
.Popu�ati�on
Wet Poultry Capacity
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑Dai Cow
❑Dai Calf
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
E[E]Farrow
❑ Non -La ers
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑Turke Pouetsr
❑ Otherumber
of Structu
n to Finish
n to Feederer
to Finishow
to Wean
ow to Feeder
to Finishs
Discharues & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑'NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,_.
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes 1a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of mcorrec lication? If yes, check the appropriate box below. �'es ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding I raulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Ub, Au.S a. Yri O.,� Ltb
01
rvrn 64- A Is T t,,.r -�` c. 0 � � .� 1 � � (V nn A in /11 6 A m vyl P-1 /Ipirhl rn inn Al
Reviewer/Inspector Name f Phone: 1 1 _ y R
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q

Facility Number: 5 l — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�j lob 09
20, o the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [I Yes [i]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp [) Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, the appropriate box below. VrYes ElNo ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Waste Application ElWeekly Freeboar
aste Analysis OSoil Analysis ante
Transfers
PPrinual
Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking ❑ Crop Yiel
0 Minute Inspections PAonthly and V Rain
Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a ram gauge?
[--]Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. D' the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
RrNo
El NA
El NE
—)-0J6
25. Did the ffaacilliity fail to conduct a sludge survey required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
]]as
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certtiif-ied`op-Amr in charge?
❑ Yes
Ld No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes UfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
K] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
ESNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
? c✓Z 1
+ r t � •
Q�,S 13 p ou�
Page 3 of 3 12128104

r f
fSUS1;�ili'{'7,.
�J i .!'si3i;fi:
p,f i�
L..:a
i 'T'.:I ''.fi
;�rfl:'r'I: �1'i3 �,-�
�?' ifiLr €_-1J "[[":lt fJ.r •.:1 C'rl rind+i r-• 1, I i ii EaJ :[3 1 Jai ,- { g t.'.11
.'r :t{;Y?.. ..,.f �,,.� _�J':;•;'rJ r �,,,.... �.rr. it a��'�',';.r�"�
j
�:!'!;. iifif£1;;11i r~^i "lr.i!'.3L;:%Ili ,�IiJae �'t lot F,..r bsi f°'ll J 1_. # , ?Iitai. �! �i.: me l �w.4
� a._.. - ... .... s` _
av
11✓
{31`f
:1
Syr,if:.:'S IS ?Li:;! tifi: l:i.i`.,4ii Ci. #V�f f?I� Jai ..;{? ..Y ..,,..
„t�
`�,.�1y
c11, t.,_i
�
I >,_ .
�i/!
':1 '[
r� �....0
•\tr EJ
f i rr
Y' a •1 - o a "O 'i is �n H 1, r. hot! 1 •" Islay
-.`.;l3fCif1[:Jr;9 Cf ,i.i_i-_F7.1 iI . "OWN # i?LLLa, 1 7 fi' i:..�'i:` rl nisi `r•`! f::i,� .)ill :I:) .tt„�',::. f
ii
ri(>ilLiji1,7c(r, ..,..;J' �.dl,•rri,'lia JJ itJi; YY[i:,l> -•;�! 1Jila .�
::�i
�1�7i [,__}
`fir �..�J11
.:� a tt,,,,.�
�rtrrJ`, ;a;Il. j..�'; r.Is 9i"tr.i7 a�,C •`tie: 8 1;1:J �: f-.i Fsfe :i,'J
..,,,�
VIE]
!I!I �k:'3rrSl aSr:} •�JC
AV`-"D
An 0
OW CA
ti;... tf::(1
r•#'.?i!F.•,,�li:�._Q i rA..�^1,, ;'.:,T'•F...YN. f,•, 1110 rSl•11Jo )dq f; •.Su-ji. ._ i#:..1'+('f 501 i41 LI�i ,r•!
.•�ir'y-•I
..'f ?,..Sa . `t.',ti rd :' � -!'J ,:17i'! '-; Oro, :JImi 'ifl1C; J•hCq :}s1L-3 .- .IS.'i; i:'.f3,.'i r.., nW1-:'iq 31:i:V7!Il'St.:. '/CtL' jaW ..
t1�i�;
!.,.,i
ri:r
j11.1 CIrJ' ,i; -.. J#s!_ �1{JC i f .. 1 rt,r� '' a r:�:i •; !! 4:, ! ;It iai i':, • ! ,f ,ti 1 1 S1 Iv :(!:; t,Fl i i. 7 ri,} •li'! 1 _ U i,� i ;,"1 1 L .�{
rlir
1� _'r
?:' :,.J
•)F;fC.'l.}Jf i`f: !i ]`riitJ'Ji :'(:r fJ 'i!:fiC i:7?[>': •�J;.....:(i] ";>'!,Y )L3'J'C iJi'7:
I
�_!%; j..J
1
l=,i'i i.�
'
rrJi �....�
r
2:��Y j_,4,
i11:: ?rl:7i 'l'i5t!�: 'l'r. ltl 'i .'.'3DO 11 :'i ;,„ ir'ax;i .A i irli': ';!llt:i`.tf ;:r,l :�"'3; it! •: riil' .:fJ� i�'� .l�l.
-
!i`.iFS:��,F:ffifrl3 `9"qa illi%IJ.ti1=a1 ,r'Y;CI:•,� -I1: . 1'.�r#it# �•'1 ., 1.,„Ji,l,?;; , 'Is? i}
Z
�F
�
�
! ' rt ITT.. •1': I 'r 1 ].. -. ,,. '1 ii. Y 1. io I 'r.
�'d_( �+:3'Cl:j7`.` !i1 �GJ112'i... JJfJi iri t.'!. ).:,.,i Si? il... jl{. rfii J:
1 n
iij': �
�1f�1
f.,b'i �...�
_;9 a
y
� isr .`.i:.l: .'1S: .li ..`Il. ..
�C;fJ!-�li•.;iCi4'jii99'i1J."/.:riJ?43lilii;'i!i5r��:ai11 .7�?%ai1V1 .Si} :ICt:;'SaE d.i3'.;i�i_
_..
0
0
0
!ia?!:. 7?17:'.., Jri low i41!-irr) PA .. .'!}[:a?s ,'1if:is _ O W
`Fva
f11r�
ew�n,rv�[tet�.•IVIw.r..'�kN:W.nWe!'AI�+F•sw.,nvK,,•%:hrv.htr.:M
�x
Aye.�.;...w.,.rsw.•�.rn.•.�.ye,tswv.",�m'.•�rr.u.:Nr.7.ax.rx,u',.u.auuf.,•c.n
}.y..ovn.rttNulin.�x.•'nr.maMe:.`fn.urnm,}n-v
rnr -III. .4v[.!.1'. i.winn RR ,vear..ln. nsft. ar•�m. t,'•tne'FI�� -. ,. • r".: R.Fn:.r.Y+uc.•..: .5t:^.wrm+e.n.c-rdG•.w,}J!
1 [s .l.. iY _•Sir}; f 1: i; •?:li.a�I •I e.[
r..... •_r-,.,�. '- .a_.aM,,,wuw. ...r... �,.„.ns.e,.. ..w.v...n. +, . +.. ar 1 .•r..... .. �.ec,_.•... ,,.x:-r:. �..� .t „r. .�,.ru. nwf ,,.emu. a....�a a.....r
9
�
y
1-
N
g
j
a
I
Y�....u.;yi
1
SZfu�i.�ikt,.,o.wu+,ea-.rwt�.s�,m•-a:�
+.55r,r.+ni1x]�s•+wexx>nwe'.+aKse•wrwrn_r,aawc
�:.r_J..c.+••�w.'«s,�-•-nn..r.__...ar•�.r.,aro,.sn...R-..r,.w+n.w„uc �.v...-7v.w.:r�a,fn-.rr.ava„ ._....,n:rror.c=+n -.ce.-r:r..•e..-. ...•:s�+r-r:�,.,<.��.un.,'.
s' p t 'i A wk

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510063 - Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510063 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 05/20/2008 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time: 12130 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: David G. Herrina Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: DavidQ Herrina
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO )fox 9 _ Newton Grove NC 28366
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
1 mile down 1002 east off of 701 north of Newton Grove
Integrator: Gis
Latitude:35'IT32" Longitude:78°2Q56!
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Henry Elias Faison Operator Certification Number: 24806
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Repressntative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Henry Faison Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Missing/ not taken Waste Analysis for Small Grain
Last Waste Analysis 08/07
1" Rainfall initial for inspection- was completed in the past then stopped
120 min inspection initial at application- was completed in the past then stopped for Small grain
Calibrations due this year
Over application on field 1-A 14,251 gal per acre
FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION SCHEDULED FOR 06/12/2008 AT 9:00.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 05/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 625 629
Total Design Capacity: 625
Total SSLW: 326,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 26.0(
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number, 510063
Inspection Date: 05/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AW5510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Inspection Date: 05/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 510063
Reason for Visit. Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare sail?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP7
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number: 510063
Inspection bate: 05/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
■
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis? E
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

de
E.
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
119
Reason for Visit WRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access/�
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �(J 4851-0IV Region: `r es'v `o
Farm Name: A)&)(LLn G . H84ZtLnr= F, „F12E ?'1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: yy�� Integrator:
Certified Operator: � �F_1a„]�y F !'lr--M—\1CF, Operator Certification Number: A, " ' a-aV Oy�
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 0 = 1 [ « Longitude: 0 ° = ` =
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
II ❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design,' Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:.:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
&
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
4No
❑ Yes
,dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 5� —� Date of Inspection EjW
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) {
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[--]
Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
IComments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: rl yak
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: &S
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Cover ge & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�,.-,�,- Co � � o � o � -1�/th�eC?AWMP 20. Does the facility fail to have a 1 components readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,}J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑ Other
21. Do record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Applications ee ly Freeboard aste Analysis oil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers —Q--unual�ctification
tlR infall Stocki" n Cr Yield 120 Minute Inspections Monthl and I" Rain Ins ections Weather Code
a � g op p y p
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes V!N 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes t�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes TNo [INA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ElYes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ yes
No
[I NA
El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
'
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ICJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
r
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)�INo
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
UJ 15� S-tE KV LDS S - a ,3 '>= 3 a 1 a) `
-
SD�- p 6 -
r C �- �'�
\I
' �2/28/04

Division of Water Quality
==,=Faci1ityumber ` 3 •Division of Soil and Water Conservation
(0,
Iml
©ther Agency
Type of Visit T Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit` Routine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral
0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time, lt eparture Time: County:
Region: LI
FarmName• d+�`v``lh
'�- GYM
Owner Email:
{�
\ � a -�_9r13 S
Owner Name: �ay d
YY vn
Phone: 4
ilr�
1 la
Mailing Address: I ' t U "7"
1
Physical Address:
1�1q
Facility Contact: Y 14 ftS'`
Title: 6 1�c_
I
Phone No: I k,IYU
Onsite Repr sentative: �f;�\j
*1
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
�
S'
Operator Certification
Number: t L
�Im
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: a e = f = 11
Longitude: = o = ' 0
m y, G-0 2 eaJ " 6,
csN 70 ` TJ A, OQ-V'AzM
T
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population
Cattle C*apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
JEI Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
* Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Other
❑Turkey Pouets
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: l — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: _
Spillway?:_____
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
El NA El NE
[I NA El NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAcceptableCrop Window ❑:/Evidence of Wind Drift [3 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 7 c C �`� 50)
13.
Soil type(s) Wa YGhn { J
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
R No
ElNA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
1�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
.IT No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
18.
is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary).
as D Z�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: LS'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: i Z.- �- J
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

a.
LJ
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection V41
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
1PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
NlNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�§No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
;gNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
CMNo
ElNA
[INE
m and report the mortality rates that were higher than noral?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a �- - ��� `r � • I 'FAQ ©� '!L" o ��?I `tJ 7 ��� ��3
._' �a fie✓
Ir d � ,, `7.5 /�)
� r
I�n
r
CA VNc ' 1 CCn'
( Pu
�,Q 5'1� S_t
R2Af \ e, � � � �l-s�/�• � � Co-
uT� r � C�✓k. �� v�'J�- G � �1��' f
YY) / JI v`
11 f 6 t j.i `
ZJ
C4�
,, C�H,
?g' pa i 3� ( f }R-Giles � `` c
M O ✓'ri
12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510063 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510063 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 12/18/2006 Entry Time:09:50 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: David G. Herring Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: David G Herring
Mailing Address: PO Box 9 Newton Grove NC 28366
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm.
Latitude:35°17'32" Longitude:78'20'�Q" _
1 mile down 1002 east off of 701 north of Newton Grove
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Henry Elias Faison Operator Certification Number: 24806
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Henry Faison Phone:
24 hour contact name Henry Faison Phone:
Primary Inspector. Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
* Operator is given OIC designation Form to be completed and send to Raleigh. *** Anthony S. Jackson old OIC is still listed as the
OIC in BIMS.***
Stocking and mortality records through 12/15/2006.
WUP dated 4-28-2005
` Waste analysis:
10/10/06 = 0.84
5/10/06 = 1.2
2!7/06 = 1.3
" Soil test report dated 1/5/06 (taken late 2005). Another sample should be taken for 2007, and lime recommendations need to be
followed.
* Reviewed waste application records - please make the necessary corrections as indicated on IRR2 forms using the correct waste
analysis.
• New waste sample sent to the Lab in Raleigh for analysis
* Lagoon freeboard levels recorded with rainfall.
* Irrigation calibration & sludge survey completed 9/7/2006: Measuerd flow 120GPM, Sludge thickness = 4.4', LTZ = 4.3'
* Need to keep crop yield records for crops not grazed - Producer given CROP-1 form.
* Fields and records are well managed.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number: 510063
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Feeder 625 610
Total Design Capacity: 625
Total SSLW: 326,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 35.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
0013
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
BOO
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
FaclIIty Number: 510063
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge surrey as required by the permit?
❑
■
Cl
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
Cl
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510063 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510063 _ _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleiah
Date of Visit: 06/23/2006 Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time: 10100 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: David G. Herring Swine Farm ' Owner Email:
Owner: David G Herdna
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 9 1 Newton Grove NC 282Q6
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°1T32" Longitude: 78°20'56"
1 mile down 1002 east off of 701 north of Newton Grove
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Docum0 1 Other Issues
Certified OperatrAnthony S Jackson l Operator Certification Number: 19331
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Henry Faison Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N hunt
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Soils report #14318 (GIS of NC); lime recommended for several fields. Indicated he will apply Fall '06.
Discussed elevated Zn, Cu,-and P in Field 1 H8. Within allowable application levels, but are high.
Sludge survey due by Oct. 1, 2006.
Utilizin Randy Sutt for records, one winter applicaiton of March 2005 added into Winter season for'05-'06 crop year. cautioned to
not over a gh error within recording proceedure.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510063 Owner • Facility: David G Herring Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 06/23/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 29.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 06/23/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for VIsIt: Routine
_
Discharges &uream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
1101111
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
Cl
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
ONOD
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

C
Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Inspection Date: 06/23/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number. 510063
Reason for Via It: Routine
W. aste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

a
Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number : 510063
Inspection late: 06/23/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Cl
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Q
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ,
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other issues.
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510063 Owner - Facility: David G Herring
Facility Number : 510063
Inspection Date: 06/23/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fall to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ IN ❑ ❑
Page: 6

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9"outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification aOther Ep Denied Access
Dale or visit: t - Time:
Facility Number
Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Permitted [3 C'led © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thre hold: ..........................
Farm Name: .... ►�s....lE!r-!.........�/?1n......................................... County:........t.*...............................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Mailing Address:
FacilityContact: ................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:+ ��
ti
.................R':i................'. 5�....................................................... Integrator................ G.t''.rs.........................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude • 4 44
/'� i_ _ if lye W _. r. ,. i 3 .y� .y
i fi: H� DesEgn ?3Current 3lYti;"' ilk ". �1 ��1 4�.'DeSlgtli 411.0 ircast f r5. �t 1 1�Design-iCurrP.nt
G
tk '
Swine Canaci atioa� Ca' acbi--`i Po iulatiai" :Cattle f� Ca"acim Pi nulatioin
".,PoiiltrY, ,k:�:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ................................... .........................................................................
❑ Yes P�o
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ;.No
ElYes [No
❑ Yes o
Structure
Continued
Freeboard (inches): ^ze �
12112103

Facility Number: 151 --3 Date of Inspection j D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ To
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
❑�l�o
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
,RNo
�Yo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type C_ zsS
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
XN0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
O No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
INo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 9(Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes VNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes[ hio
Air Quality representative immediately.
`i'-,�,#Mi.AI!.iWt•at1.:l .�w.is,t."'';h,€t:'�"�:�is,tSfi4a:'t.i;•": Ek;iYE%-P..._."9�i.€ �;°pwj"AEMd°`?i` �"'.._"s't3EHSi:3°R?C;e:t:'1:6�AY.e!diiii':»•'a.4 S3Sftii:,af.:.F,.. Sh €. ;s".➢( .}iai. �.:-'•:B€IP1iSh =.,t;�;.,,w s.E€:,� - ? ;7'�il,.ei'.�.d ,€�..! n F.
I Comments'{refer,3 to` uestron"#) '=Ex ln! YES±answers and/ar an ".recommendatxoa5'or,:;.. , atiier comtnts. aa,?j;y ,I�:
iid 4 �; lS�t�•. u�.>,.t4 fly.€€,;�s��t� s�i� �g � nr �;� .�,�:,..�,�::�„���,4E
lse drawingsI:of;facilityti3to'bet�{ter �1,;.,���r s�tusttoas {use addihonal'pages as necessary) '3 Field Cof1V Final Notes
R:e?�i!<__ ,y P��pf � Slk ([N �s{,�M,H' µ�(��F, �€!M �A£ i 1 t{¢�[ �?50;�1.� €.y - h 1� k k {p��.ii. � fr�"U'y{]j� y.�� q,wp gr Irt!q,.� ❑yq q"1y�� y,^^' .f�l FfY - �� ���:
.E«-,Or.:€(�.�ii.1.1.:C�c:�:r.F�Y[:[ri`...x.<�cf�l!ll� NbLie...Crtil.�Ni.�..:,_i.1,���%..n�l..R.C�..�rE����[.�3.%'�t.�,1�c��L�Q1�.nN�irif
P >i D V i tAlb ri_"__ aS sM'%T C+ r
►�GRC-A 6S 1-1 w' A
Ab
� i ,i, �
� �"'PT �4
Reviewer/InspectorNsme>,t;�r
� "�l""
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G„_ Date: I
12112103 1 Continued

e
Facility,Number: 1 , Date of Inspection jl
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
2'11fes
❑ N
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) � I.Ly 1a 4,
❑ Yes
o
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ Waste ication� 3e board ❑ Wfftte Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
g,G
Is facility not in compliance with any setSid! criteria in effect at the time of design?
applicable
❑ Yes
VN0
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�4o
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
[,-YNo
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
L�No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? t
❑ Yes
ZNo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
;�No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
ONO
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Reinfall ❑ Inspection After I " Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
�Fa��aux�

IType of Visit 4 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit eRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1G 1a 3 Time: ) �
Facility Number
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
9Permitted Wcertified M Conditionally Certified O Registered Date Last Operated or Above
�Thresho
n►
Farm Name: County: _ a 0 sr -ay
Owner Name: Phone No: — 1-zg7
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: %�A C K S a QlAgR - 1-1-£9t}: p1f4ntegrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 1. 64 Longitude • �� �4.
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder 6 Z S
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry CapacitV Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Holding" PondsfbSohdyTraps C
0' ❑N
Discharges 8 [ream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 3
05103101
,J Spray Field Area
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes JeNo
❑ Yes ?(No
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes V6 o
❑ Yes 120
❑ Yes R(No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Humber: —03 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes �Na
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes /No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive
nding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes RNo
Z
12. Crop type 5.G
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes j`No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes O'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes j/No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permits or other Permit readily available? El Yes XNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certtt"icd AnimajZ tevi, anagement Plan readily available? �J
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) I;L ❑ Yes ,7No
J�
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irriAtion, frcOoard, Z to anal sis & soil sample reports) El Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ZNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes �lo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes �o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes .7r" l
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�Ucllsie
ments (refer to question #): Explain any YES a, veers and/or any r�ecomm.endattions or,,any other comments , ' �,
iirawmgs ofsfa ility to.betterRexplain situations '(use additional' pages as,nec ssari
r r
(.Field Copy Final Notes
✓RWAJ
i�^t>:.D rF A iPrT �Ti1Jr�Jr��,fa LAGSJ.f) tJ�.di �Es �r �sset►'j—
�rt
Reviewerllnspector Name ± ... i %J, .TYZ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: W/01 0
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection a
Odor lssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
' 7
VYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes �rNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ONo
XYes ❑ No
05103101

Type of Visit P'L`ompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ,Q�outine o Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notificati Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 06 Time: =v a
Not O erational OBelowThreshold
ermitte Certified O Conditionrally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshol
Farm Name: �6SLA �Z i �i� County: , �
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
On site Representative: sLerr
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: C 1 S
Operator Certification Number: _ 'I 3,31
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Swine Ca aci
❑ Wean to Feeder
Current
P,o ulation P,oultr
❑ La er
Design Current Design Current
Ca aci 1'o ulatian Cattle Ca aci P.o ulat3on
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
11Design
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
0 Gilts
❑Non -La er
❑Other
❑Non -pair,
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Lab
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons �
Nnlding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ S ra Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges % Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 j
❑ Yes , 'No
❑ Yes <O
❑ Yes N F
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ Yes
No'
El Yes
P<0
❑ Yes
R ` O
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: { — t; Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
WasteAIR1111cati2n
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required ,Rtcordd§& Dpci moments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fait to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name U
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
Field Copy
Date:
Final Notes

Facility Number. S
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan bells, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
VYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 5Vo
❑ Yes P40
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes e:fNNo
❑ Yes •L] No
❑ Yes P "O

Type of Visit Z Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number $I 6 Date of Visit: �Time:
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..........................
Farm Name: ..............- l inlG-.................... County:.......... � r.:��....................... I...........
Owner Name:
Phone No:
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: Integrator: S....................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
i
,WSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 " Longitude • d 44
Design ; ` ; Current' Design . Current Design Curs
Swine Ca aci ' Po ulation :. Poultry Ca aci Po ulation , Cattle Ca acr '' Populat
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
2
v
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Oyes (IF1TIo
Discharge originated at: PCagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other ``fir
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes g(No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes16 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) '0Yes jEpko
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes.16No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 01No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes .rNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:...............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
3
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: SJ — /63 Date of Inspection z3 1 Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes/[!rNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
f
closure plan?
ElT] Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
dNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑410
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
PNo
elevation markings?
Waste Application
ENo
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
H. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
eNo
12. Crop type A-. &;Lq'� 1�i.'Z� W.AGrt
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
ZINO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
V. PEt" ��,rtd./ ��o� Sn/g
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Rio
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
es
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�Io
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes WITO
t-rpf V
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) yj �6 ❑ Yes �No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrivion, froXoard, wassjte analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 2%
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ZNo
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ONo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes B'N0
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ;3,f4o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes „EM)
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ,E3No'
yi�iq>rs'o 0�1F`tf Yorj� w�i >�ee�iye Ito fu�tt�r' ,
cor': dense.'aback this visit:
ALLOWq•p 23S 6A/i►c. I 4xt�ov1 irer��+u�. z33 �y d�4Pt�£9 140`d�IER-� •
j,-ASr u1 Asti A.JaLys� S =� -'� uilfu► �,p� pz Tm Fi`6�� ��
1� L E hN� d'C f f 1 D asr.li a n)p[.-AV,
L
i K —z -tin r 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name ��.1. , ��,:E F ,;�r,ot�r=r ;t� f s�°� i, ��t`573�1t.�1.,�.. ¢ Q O'i��14..Ai,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: •2 It, 1 5100

Facility Number: Sf —b3 Date of Inspection 1 '7.7z-31 01
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below .Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 2fNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ZNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? EI'Yes ❑ No
� 6 3119 "m i3 y D A-C�
5100

JjarRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number s 3 Date of Inspection
— / Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
RPermitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered © Not O crational Date Last Operated:
vi 1�i t'rr Er �- r> e� Count "J-X 7'3 .�.f
Farm Name:....�}.............................................................................................................. y=....................................................
Owner Name: ......... �',��'S. Q"' S ► S J y Phone No:
............................................................................................................................................................................................
Facility Contact: ........
Mailing Address:
Title:
Phone No:... ...........................
Onsite Representative:Integrator: S
............................................................ g ��,..................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • =' .6
iDesign t " U
:$wine
{
A
....................................... ...
Longitude
Design Current
n ,11'oultry Capacity'. Population C
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
{a -Z5
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of' the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):............................................................ ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J"No
❑ Yes El"No
❑ Yes 2No
Structure 6
❑YesO'No
Continued on back
3/23/99

)F'aciliey Number: 5 1 — (,,3 Date of Inspection I I T
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ;d'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 12r!No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes ]INO
elevation markings?
.
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 13o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes No
12. Crop type J3 cgrA�.V 0, Ste - G PA,-j
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes 2 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ElNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes Q-No
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes O No
Required Records & Documents ) zx7z
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes dNO
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �a
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ,Yes ❑ No
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design? ❑ Yes J'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ONo
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) j2r.(es ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ZdNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 014o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes A�N0
0'. �i4•yiQl�itq>�s'o�- di~f c�ertcies-v►�tre sit: • Y:o� wi�j•�ee�iye �#o; �u�t��r
icoriesporidence: a)bout: this visit: •..........:................:....... .
A 60C CAT"O ,/ At Ta A-LL. L ES� TOA 4 S a�� _ L
s r�o ��� �a �► ZR f� jr'^r - M RSI- dons-Y DL,,fQ OlaC4 r.3_ Q(CJ17-F Dr
,Z) �taAan vrg Pz,w+e?.r
r Erg 73y
Reviewer/Inspector Name `W:N adxi,� ; � ;_� � � ;g � � �, r ., � � , .r , a
4s '-'§� °V E�. i�s l�. �t; �ab..��.`i ��„t ���,�-.�";�°r: W�Q sf 3s �.�_. '.,��ei. ,ai ^�Si :[al.,.;i :T
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /,L.r Date: sf 1 S

Fmillily Number: S j — 6 3 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 101yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 2 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes JdNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑'No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes {Z/No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /Q No
+1

[a Division of Soil and=Water Conservation O eratton Review
�E��,}E� � E �� �i'i Ii4 •�j �j :� _, �E-- txv E f. Pi� 91g
F : , r Drvisiop of S ompliance od and Water Conservation CInspection Ik t - �;�.� , y,
i I01 ivision of Water Quality° Compliance Inspection ` i o t ; I aj I uy s
.r. /� �31" �.1V■i[�PT AQPf�f`V -. l�1PTfl��Al�ARPVIPW'1.
�
outine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW ins ection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 3 Date of Inspection
p l� Time of Inspection ,3o 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permlttea Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .1460. ...... cz.)..AZ........................................ County:..........cl.�?N ^�S TJ.r�!.....................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:................ 1"hone No:
MailingAddress: ............................................................................................................ . ....... .............................
Onsite Representative: .............................................
SC.�TC J �l So.J . Integrator: { �...........................................................
...............................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 6 '1 Longitude 16
Number,of Lagoons 0 s f + ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La�uon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holchng3Pon Is / Solid,Traps � �,��I .i ❑ No.Liquid Waste Management System
w
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge ori-mated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes R No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0<0
c. li' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notil'y DWQ) ❑ Yes [—zrNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .6 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts o{potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ONo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ?fNo
Structure I' Structure 2 SfruUure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: JJ
Freeboard(inches): ...... :......... .1. ....................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes JNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack

Fat lity Number: 1 -- 3 Date of Inspection J
6. Are there structures on -site which Lire not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes , j o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 0No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes � No
12. Crop type C . R 'IDp, t> s'Tti.. tr V_ -" � /Rt[ /
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certi
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land applicatio-n?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility Fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility Fail to have a actively certified operator in charge`?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ONO
Cl Yes ONO
❑ Yes ,2(No
❑ Yes ;!(No
❑ Yes prNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes .eNo
❑ Yes QfNo
❑ Yes INO
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
El Yes Zo
Reviewer/Inspector Name �Chrtil 1 £4 e�� s7 r°� i_ ���� i -} ��{ 3 i
€..z.._.L; t�.,.f.: tl..: - '. ., l i . S„ �,�._:_ t �� ..,1 1 _.,.�..t a.t�r ,�E. e3 €� i <.i �_s£ It
Reviewer/inspector Signature: .�.. _ _ Date: -•q
3123/99

► F.acdity Number: — 1?atc ()f Inspection I (o
Odor .issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ply/es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ; "o
2& Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [3/No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ZNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) Zy's ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 2<0
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ;21-y/,-s ❑ No
Additional ' omrnerits an or rawin s - ' a
-n M. ...,_..._ .•.. ••,.i... .. e. ;.,... i e� .� > .� xb.�.:, f} ;I iiA , �H '..L - 4W F. { I S i 1 3 i ii: ,{.t� i ' t.e �� i S �
A6
J
3/23/99

I
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
[] Division of Soil an(] Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
❑ Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
❑ Other Agency - Operation Review
lq_Routine Q Com plaint Q Other
Facllitl• Number
1);Il ' of Inspe"-61111
n1' tri-4pection
24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified
❑ Registered
JE3 Not O er,rtiunaE
Date Last Operated: ..........................
}
Farm Name: .... .... ..........l t .l�lii/........�?rr�%.4: LC ......
......................
C'uunh.:........
lJ,b4� f!-}. ✓i.........................I............
OwnerName: ...........................................................................................................................
I'llonu No: .......................................................................................
facilityContact: ..............................................................................
1 itle:................................................................
Phone No: ................
[�lailir►h Atldress:................................................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsitr Representative...1............. (L....... 4 .�.......... L 'ItrY v nte�raior:........
5.1....... . ..........................................................
Certifier( Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
............................. ................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude I,ongilnde
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
p
EI Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laycr ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream frripacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If'yes, notify DWQ)'1 ❑ Yes No
Discliargc originaicd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Fick] ❑ Other
a. ](discharge is ohscs'ved, was the convquncc roan-ntadc!
1). if discharge is observes). did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If dischar»c is ohserved, what is the: estimated flow in [*alhnin''
d. Docs discharge hvpass a higuon s.vstenl:'
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'.'
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes t2 No
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ Yes
PdNo
❑ Yes
[} No
❑ Yes
17
XNG
Slr'uCttrrc 1 Structure 2 StruciurC' a Structure -1 Structure 7 Structure 6
Iderlt.ifier:
Freeboard(inches):,, ?... ..... ........................................................ .
1/6/99
Continued on back

Facility Number: = I?.rte of' Irtspcction /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.) /
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed throu1*1h a waste mana-entent or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DNVQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes 9No
S. Does any part ol'the waste management system other- than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, ­augcd markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes [ No
N%'aste AI)PHc:rtion
10. Are there any huffers that need maintenance/improvement:' ❑ Yes �No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Poncling ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes C1 No
12. Crop type ...A6 ... I ..114. 56� .. 144_.�.......................................................I.............
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes ZNo
14. Does tlhe facility lack wettable acreage for land application" (footprint) El Yes l_J too
15. Does the receivinc, crop need improvement" ❑ Yes 'KNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;�fNo
Rey uired Records & Docnnrents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZfNo
I S.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc,)
❑ Yes
;eNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, frcchoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
,2fYes
❑ No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�INo
21.
Did the facility, fail to have. a certified operator- in responsible change?
❑ Yes
11No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emCI-LMIcy situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
VNO
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ o
24.
Dees facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
WYes
[ No
O.1Vo.violatioRs.or.
deficiencies .were noted: ciriring.this.visit.. V-66 vYil1.rerceive nar further. .:.
• cpr.r. ...dence:abut.this is.... . . ..' .' . .' . .... . ... .............. •. .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
5 F_ Afr v FF
�p 01h��
# wo-w-C 14Ne,-1&- 5 a
0
vC972. 3 - '-ju s0,
U
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
1 /6/99

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility NumberOperation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name:_01 4-/rl5�u, _ r,,, acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representati Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit:
—Z-0-peration not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Da a of most recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: ? pounds
7 c:L"e, k d #Vf rid Y14 h
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
5. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
_ZE1 Adequate irrigation design, includinggap depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE. tJefn er r Coc lZt .�-
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part I11).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 -Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

D: an of Soil and Water Conservation [j Other Agency
X.'£kf sE to Mi : , S
F
ivision of Water Quality'
s�. x �e. r- :��' ;.' `""` .<.:.... � ;.^,wy',r, ya xts'��.s�.y�""; 5"'w;.w �'"i" ;M„k;��,� �"•y,xypb, c - �: ° °
'k
outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of inspection U 1
F ility Number Time of inspection Eb D 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit (3 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: A)......6... � .....54../.r� ._ . lei-/l +}-:... County:..,. ..... .5.......................................... r
Owner Name :....:...?...... 1.kL'..i.::.'...!t..,,.............................................................. Phone No: �a �ar�.........9.... �� ........... ....................
FacilityContact: ......... !g.. ......................................... Title: ................ I ...... ......................................... Phone No:....................
MailingAddress:..'.... ........ 6.. Q...f`.........L.......... ..i;�.�:k.......................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:..til rr n ... Integrator: ....... 6.......... :7........... .............................................
Certified Operator;.......,).., p ��� Operator Certification Number,.......................
....:J...............................................................
Location of Farm: D fe— l(J-o 2--
......................................................................:...........
...........•...........................................................
...... ................................................
........._................
Latitude �'�� �" Longitude �• �� �"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 21" o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0<0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes M
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[]Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No

F'aci". Number: f
I�
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes Col o
Structures (Layoonsdloldina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Na
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ........ :...................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �No-
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do an of the structures need maintenance/im rovement? ❑ Yes No
Y p
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? �
❑ Yes
FrNo
Waste Applicatiort
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
< o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type / SM �I t r►...................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
, o0
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Y�No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? +a w: { �` }=� ^ r�{ G� a `/C C, '6 `r
�
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
t7 •5 r� tsl
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PK/
21.
Did Reviewedlnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
<0
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
O_Ko
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility -fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
We ny additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Pert -nit'?
El Yes
❑ No
No.viQlations-or deficiencies were -noted -during this. visit. - .You will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit., . , : : `
Conitttents (refer to question #) "Explain any Y ES a"nswers and/or any rernmmendations or any other comments:
se:tlrawangs Qf fuciltty to better explatt3 situations. (use addrt1) al �ii es as nece5sarv) 2
J
S` � � � .9 t' � 6 r to .,, e n � =4--� !Q Lhv Gli` t4 tn�q • � / '� � � %L�- � S R-T ` i!'�^ `3tij S Z�=yr- . 1'9 4 rL ¢ �.. e-" { �
PAC
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature: /,Z771e, Z Date:

. • �F Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency �N
Dtvtsion of Water Quality '
Fa.;v
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follo�tr-u of DNN'Q inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection /I' U 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered E3 Certified 0 Applied for .Permit © Permitted 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated;
n `` liV� County: ..........................
Farm Name:.... D............���r 6Lt21!".v....�cl..............�.............................. f�'.Ct✓....................... .... ...... I ............
OwnerName:........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ....................j........q.............................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ........ (.,1./.1 U.10..... .. .... Integrator:.......v.... .S......
........................... ..........................................................
Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..................
Location of Farm:
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IINo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed. dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes EJ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑INo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Cl Yes
4No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
❑ Yes
E No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge"
❑ Yes
(LJ No
7/25/97 Continued on hack

r.
aciiity Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes PNo
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds. Flush fits. etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier: ................................... ....... ...
Freeboard(ft). .........t....................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes P(No
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
........................................................................
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 16 No
Waste, Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes VNO
(If in excess of fWMP, or runoff enteringg�waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1�- !� �.��...(��.............. .................................................... .......................................... ........................ I.........
15. Crop type ...........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ZTYes o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitt d Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ No.violationsor. deficiencies,werenotediluring this', visit' Y6 'ill receive ito�ftirther.:-
correspondence , li out'this:visit::. ::::: ; ::: ::..::. :: :
❑ Yes [,TNo
❑ Yes ,fNo
❑ Yes IV No
ElYes YJ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes ?No
,ETYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
0 meitgrefer't►quesfaon #� :Eplsttii`aoyiS answersindlOrany 1/mnit IIatI�A3i`II� Ofht'CQt�15�:
sct - - �kx
Use rawiii s of facility to bettear�ea�plairi sttua ons usea�dditrotuil{pales asrnecessary • t
.: .. ..
i(o `- co le4 fln"Pd s &V !��- ,V c� s r -nth` i
f N o 1�02df'7 c�'� /(/ -a-o Ls7o G (i G-L�� • /� rT I�G' r�.tio FF D'.� 12/L��/ na tj
�. D V ale- iV/f--! _
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector NameP.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: y h

Facility Number Date of Inspection ! I r
Time of Inspection DID 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Regstered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
ertitied ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:............................................................................/......................................................
Farm Name: .......... ... .......}� �.r ! ................w..^!.�....................................... Couiaty:.....................��.n... S w1..........., ....,..............
Land Owner Name: ....... 0_6..... jgst C!fkt�. ....Sw!N e.................................1. Phone No: ...... q(:{t....... .................................
Facility Conctact:............Q.........:........................... ..................... Title:........ X"!!:5!.................. Phon/eI No:....�. ��r..
Mailing Address:...........L:..R..... �1�..........�...Z:.! .......................................................... .........L7.�a?:' ....._�.C35
............ 2e:?!c4�........
OnsiteRepresentative:.....................JS! C ...sa!!.................................... Integrator:..........................................................................
Certified Operator: ............... �:'r..�C:O_ft ......... 4.Lr....................................... Operator Certification Number:...,( �..III....................
Location of Farm:
.......................................................4. ........................... .........................ocGi................................................................................................................ 4?
.........N......,.................. .
............................ /................................... .......................................... ..................... ...............................
a
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,,...,, Er -No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes 0-f o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ETo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑'T o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes I0J ' No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes l✓�J<0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ,C,,3,'N<o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes I,sd' 0
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility illumber: l —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible'eharge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or I-Iolding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
q.4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes R, No
ElYes BNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes . 2<0
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
.c� . a� . Y.. ..t°..(s..! .4.9n. e.............................................................
.......................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP).
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatt
..................................................... .
0 Yes , oo
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes GKIO
[Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
........................................................
❑ Yes &5
❑ Yes 021l<40
❑ Yes LKO
❑ Yes ,E1.1</0
❑ Yes ��10
❑ Yes O-KO
❑ Yes W-?o
❑ Yes [To
❑ Yes +[ 31vo
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility ASsesvmenl Unit 4/30/97

�-DS WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
[]DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
9-Routine O Com laint O Follow -tip of D1V 1 inspection O Follo%-u of I)S%VC revii�%v`--�p Q"thVit " "w'uIrnL urrit;t j
Dtte of Inspection ' `$
Facility Number
• Time (if Inspection t 24 hr. (hh:mrn)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex;1.25 for I hr 15 ntin)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
© Not U er, tional I Date Last Operated: ...............................................................................................................
Farm N'imc•:....... ...1.1'.......1 E�! .��. ' �-.✓� �J� County':...,.. O.%4.1a ram. ..............................
OwnerName : ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:
Facility Cotttact: .......... ..... Title: ... Phone No: " ...-..-J... 3�j
J.... /...f......................................... 7
Mailing .Address: ,.....1'� ......�J...�..�........ ��.. � Ll.............................../..4�..� �..��ri�......... �2Q�.1 � ....... l V.�...... a2� 3��,A
�1J
Onsite Representative: ..... Ar.......... 8�4,.ewz.7 .................................. Integrator...................... ice...................
Certified Operator: ............................................ ...... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude • 9 « Longitude ' , c,
Numlier•:iif L�a�ootis / Hdldtt3P Pondso I ' K`1U Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area JU Spray Field Area 101
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
't.
3. Is there evidence of past discm discharge froanypart of the operati�:.on?
❑ Yes 9(! .
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes i No
❑ Yes N No
[:]Yes,, No
❑ Yes 0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require es N0
maintenance/improvement? ICA
4/30/97
Continued on back

rFacility Number: e-
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'
Structures (l.a2oons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Stricture 3
.........• F �... ��.1...................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
❑ Yes [INo
❑ Yes j2r'No
❑ Yes EINo
❑ Yes . No
Structure i Structure G
❑ Yes A No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes __1N0
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? . ❑ Yes ZNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D"1Q)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
/Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff en eying waters of the State, notify DWQ)
17N0
15.
Crop type /.l• .... ......... ..1 ...�. �......�...........................................................................,..................I....................
..........
lb.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
ElYes
Ao
zr4o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
O No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VINO
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
IJ No
21,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
YNo
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
[INo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
idNo
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
[3No
Of F�'-O` V IJ /' S'ok L e re 6 `op, G+ e`yL& n [j
w UN .
w,
Reviewer/Inspector Name mar �. t , " °�%a .
Reviewer/lnspector Signature:�%f%„A 1 Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Qu ity Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Jt3_-14-1995 15:26 FROM OEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TC
RPt] P . 02/02
Site Requires Immediate Aatnlor!
Facility No.
DIVISION 0F'ENV1RONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 10 11-0 - -, L995
Time:
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County:
Tnuegrawr Phone:
On Site Revresentativc: ) ��G,-,- ;'-, Phone:
Physical Add_mssa ocadon: _ ' 0,C)
Type of Operation: Swint Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �a -5-SU Number of Animas on Sire. _66v o - -
DEM CertiE=icm Number. ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 S - I -7 ' 3Z_ .. Longitude: jL 7.0 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal. Waste Lagoon have suffzcienr freeboard of L Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Fooc + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: _� F� Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) beingutitized: �_ �G,-to
Does the facility meet SCS minimum. setback- criteria'? 200 Feet. from Dwellings? �e or No
—_ 100 Feet from Wellsk s or No
^e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Fect of USGS Blue Line-Sm=? Yes orro
--mimal waste land a�plicd or spray irrigated awithin 25 Feer of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes
' - animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or tether
sir-:i,ar than -made devices? `des br No If Yes, Please Explain.
' )rats the facility ruaintain adequate waste mattagesncm.records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
s-pray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop,)'? Yes or No
Additional Comments: 2. LY3 S � y�� r.�-c � ✓3 S SCS
V1, 6 S r4- }- �'r"r ✓d l l 19 ^-Q- -- D f� Lv - -�9 i GN9 S e
Sigr�tuse
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

IUL-14-1995 1S:2b FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02i02
Site Requires Immediate Actendor-
Facility No. 5t
DNiSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
-- - ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAI IONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: o'S of 4S , 1995
Time:
­FarmName/OwnerS �n ��rQe�iNyc4P nil vs
d �,• /
Mailing Address.01 Bch T�4 tct� e lQd,__ _- j_ewi �rcve �2
Counry:
r
. Jiiiegrator. Tc h h Sc yew-- _ _ _ _ Phone: /9
°nOii'Site Representative: _ 0, G . /7 Pre, , _ � Phone: 21 rpzl
sPhysical -AddressJLoeation: l . ter ,vrs f of ANa�}cn vi�� e � L� . ,L�1c .t *gym, .. l X s R /ICJ
`k i 017� at q, G �!qoff_ VonMae
-,Type of Operation: Swine -A, Poultry. Cattle
=Design Capacity: 7 _ _ Number of.Animals on Site: kfLa+^e Ipplfe f11�.�
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ ,_•_� DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
s
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:' Feet
Circle Yes or No
:.Does tma he Anil Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard. of l Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
8es� tajee,s o++r lajoar 1,r fY, csiUww1 w�b/1*,-,
"'':( PProxitnately;l Foot + 7 inches) or No Acru4 freeboard: LLL
—Ft. Inches �Q n
Was°any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or Was any erosion observed? Yes or �' A��'
:Zs adequate Iand.available-for spray? e or No Is the cover crop adequate? or No'
Cr6' (s) being utilized: rgsse d _ c� - �tl syts
Does .the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 9P.- or No
i 00 Feet from Wells? Te or No
7-6e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or 19
_udmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'! Yes orIG
"; animal waste discharged into waters of he state by inan-made ditch, flusbintg system, or tither
,-iTrilas- man-made de -,,ices? or N6 if 'Yes. Please Eyplairt_ a 2 5' yr, s'�av,n s j,;11 y 9'7�- y e
' )i --; tic facility maintain adequate waste tniujagernent records (volumes of ruanure, land applied. Z
spray irrigated on specific acreage with coves crop)'? Yes or No-
Addirional Comments: T %`fie r, Ass itus AC41' _bL2i
. •... Gi 2 vQar• S7�'or•.s� �`'� I [G �r1- -'-i �" ��s _-tit ��7t' , /.S _ v i 1�'rPr �«{rQl.
Signat
cc: Facihry Assessment Unit. Use Attachments if Needed_
TOTAi- P.02

316ts o qag � �-ea
� eM
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 51-63
County:
Johnston
Facility Name: DG Herring Farm
Certified Operator Name: Alan Herring Operator Number:
998820
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon Lagoon 5
1
N
10
2. Check all applicable items
X Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste
9/18/2018
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information lusted above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
David Herring Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 9/26/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
I.
Structure ID: 1
line m = 1040.7 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
—lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 1040.7lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
11760
2
small grain os
8.36
100.00
836.0
SEP-MAR
4651
1
small grain os
5.99
100.00
599.0
SEP-MAR
10668
1 H4
small grain os
3.70
100.00
370.0
SEP-MAR
10668
1 H5
small grain os
4.71
100.00
471.0
SEP-MAR
10668
1 H6
small orain os
3.90
100.00
390.0
SEP-MAR
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period,
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 2666.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1040.7 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 2666.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -1626 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. A new sample is at the
lab & will certainly be lower than the last sample due to the heavy rains. Will update after it is analyzed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft4
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
10.0 inches
19.0 inches
9.0 inches
666541 ft2
373929 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 74178 ft3
h. current herd # 7-2-41-6-1 certified herd #1 2416
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines In + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 6/15/2018
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
74178 fts
®W
41195 ft3
143832 gallons
2.01 Ibs/1000 gal,
1040.7 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

NCGER
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
David G Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 224
Newton Grove, NC 28366
Dear David G Herring:
John E. Skvarla, Ili
Secretary
October 1, 2014
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510063
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to David G Herring, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for David G. Herring Swine Farm, located in Johnston County, with a swine animal
capacity of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 2416 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS510063 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pgy careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone:[phone] \ Internet: htto:llwww.ncdenr.gov/
An Equal Opportunity t AMrmative Action Employer— Made In part by recycled paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terns and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: http://www.weather.gov/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Thomas A. Reeder
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS510063)
AFO Notebooks
Prestage Farms Inc

.h
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 14, 2018
CERTIFIED MA1L
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 224
Newton Grove, NC28366-8366
NC Dept of Environmental Quality
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
FEB 2 0 2018
Raleigh Regional Office
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Permit Number AWS510063
Johnston County
Dear Permittee,
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The following invoices are outstanding:
Invoice Number
Fee fo Year
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2018PR000090
2018
2/5/2018
180
2017PR000409
2017
2/9/2017
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person"
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contra -
,, "Ncything Compares`--,
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
-tLs'-S.UJO.Tj-�'
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWS510063)

CURTIS BARWICK
103 Country Club Circle
Clinton, NC 28328
September 21, 2010
Raleigh Regional Aquifer Protection Section
Attn: Mrs. Jane Bernard
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Jane,
Please find enclosed an updated Waste Utilization Plan for DG Herring Sow Farm (51-63).
Fields 1 H7A, 1 H7B & 1 H8 have changed to a millet/winter annual rotation.
If you need further information regarding this please call me at 910 385-1000. Thank you for
your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Curtis Barwick

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Tuesday, April 26, 2005 A �U/ o
Producer: D G Herring `
Farm Name: D G Herring Swine Farm 51-63
-- - - — P O�Box 9 ;
Newton Grove,NC 28366
Telephone # : [phone]
Type of Operation :
Number of Animals:
Farrow to Feeder Swine
625 sows design capacity
Application Method:. Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or „groundwater. The plant nutrients in. the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual -soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can -be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of theawaste and to ensure that it. -is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities: Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater -than 5 tons per acre per year. With special. pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre -per year. Do.notrapply waste on
saturated soils, when it'is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should -,,also: be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize: the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should -be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise -this plan. Nutrient levels-for--injecting_waste-and-irrigating---
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste man agement'facility.,Attached"you,will-find-information-on-proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements-for-compliance-with-1 5A- NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
R
ECE VE
LSEP 2 2 2010
RQ8W1 of 9
Ralelgli ReglanalOffice
• ter,

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
----------625"6ow6 X -7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 4562.5 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
625 sows X 6.5 lbs PANlsowslyear = 4062.5 PAN/year
Applying.the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste ih' a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application. ;
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE' NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME - -
10fifi7
-
--1H1q- _ ._
WAGRAM,0 6%
_....._.... - - _......._
BC
._.....
4.7'
... ...... -� ---
235
--
01
2.0..
2,02
_.-- -- ---
474.7
----------,
MAR-OCT
10667
1 H 1 A
1 H18
-. 1 H1 B
WAGRAM 0-6%
�WAGRAM O-6%
—I-
IWAGRAM 0-6%
SG
BC
I SG
1
4.71
1
50
2351
50
Oi
01
01
2.02
4.34
4.34
1011
1019.9
; 217
SEP-MAY
MAR-OCT
SEP-MAY
10667
10667
13683
- 1H7A
IWAGRAM O-6%
11
200
— 0
2.59
518
APR-AUG
13683
11­17A
"IWAGRAMO-6%
_SA
WA
1
33.1
SEP-ARP
13683
- 1H7B
- 11-178
- 1 H8
1- 1H8
�-
WAGRAM 0$%
jWAGRAM 0 6%
1WAGRAM 0-6%_T -
viWAGRAM 0-6%
--
_ I WA_ 3
-_ - SA_
— WA 1
1;
1
11
11-
2001 01 2.59
901 01 2.59
2001 01 4.07
90L 0 4.07
5181
APR-AUG
136$3
233.1
SEP-ARPT
13683
_ 8141
366.3
APR-AUG_
SEP-ARP
_
13683
TOTALS: 4495.1
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This -plan only addresses Nitrogen.
rz, . ' • tag
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
------(Agreement-with-adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
4
TRACT FIELD
SOIL TYPE &CLASS-
CROP
YIELD LBS AW COMM
ACRES
LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
N/ACRE N/ACRE
USED TIME
14668 j 1 H2
FWAGRAM Q-6o°
L.....-_._.___._..._.�....___._..-------i-.......---�
BC
4.7i 235
4',--
3.58
� 841.3� MAR-OCT
_.10668_ � 1H2
GRAM 0.6/o
1 SG 1; 50; 0;
3.5$
_-- .....,...-.. __ ...,,.�
1791 SEP-MAY _
10668 1H3
_
10668 i� 1 H3
WAGRAM Q 6%
!WAGRAM 0-6%
BC
; SG
4 7 235 --
1 • 50i -
0'
Oi-
4.34
1419.9, MAR-OCT
_
2171 SEP-MAYS -
4.341
Toracs: 2257.2
i
M Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
Acreage figures -may exceed'total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS NIUNIT
SG HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED TONS 50
BC
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED 50
- - _ - . _._._ .. - ... -- -- i -- --- {
SA 1 S_UMMER ANNUALS _AC 110 s
WA rWINTER ANNUALS-------. ---------------- -- --------_— � — AC i 100
Page 3 of 9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 15.61 4,495 ''
TABS 2 7.92 2,257 �
TOTALS: 21�63 6,752I
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 4,063
`""BALANCE -2,690
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in.order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in
the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste -Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 687.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well, special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be: used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION. OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size,. and organic solids. The application
amount should not -exceed the available water holding capacity -of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your. facility is designed for 180 days of, temporary storage andthe temporary storage must
be removed on.the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stared in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the.top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this, plan"invalid---_.._----_.— ---
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
RATE (inlhr)
AMT (inches)
110667
-1HIA,-IH1H
WWAGRAM 0-6%
SG
D.60
1 €
10667
I H I A, IHIB
WAGRAM 0-6%
BC
D.6_o
i 1
.._-__.
'10668
-IH2,-IH3
u
WAGRAMO-6/°
SG'
_ - -. 0:60-
'1 I
10668
1 H2, I H3
WAGRAM 0-6%
BC
i 0.60
13683
-I H7A, I H7B. I HS
WAGRAM 0 6%
WA
0.60
+1
€ 1
r13883
-IH7A,-IH713,-IH8
WAGRAM O-6%
SA
j 0.60
i '1
* This -is -the -maximum -application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In -many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 4 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
- ---•---------Acreages based on irrigation designs by Tom Crockett Irrigation. i
Page 5 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any -.
.discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.. Illegal discharges -are subject
to a9sessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field.Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. if the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a
copy of a written agreement .with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal.waste.shall be applied. to meet,. but. not exceed, the Nitrogen needs' for realistic
crop yields based on'soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or,,,.'
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no -..-
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff
leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See
FOTG Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in -the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment,file for guidance.)
"7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies -and to provide uniformity -of -application-- - ---- - -- --
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied'on actively growing crops -in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrientsshallnot be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste'shail
nbt be applied -more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from anv perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
Page 6 of 9

other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied A
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. "Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those. :.
owned by the landownwer.
-14: Waste shall be applied 'in a;manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not -be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands- by-a_---.ti-- - -�
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands'; .
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a -"technical specialist".'
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or
drift from the site.
- _ -- = _
*16. Domestic and -industrial=waste-from -washdown..facilities, showers, toilets,'sinks, etc.,--
--- -
-------shall not be discharged intoahe animal waste management system. -
*17. A protective cover: af:_appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, -.pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas.and -shall be fenced, as -necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees; -shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate.,,L: r oon areas should-be,kept mowed -and -accessible. Lagoon. berms
and structures should be`ihspected regularlyfor-evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. =
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner -is- -
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the --
possibility of an illegal discharge,:pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns,leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist:should-be=­.
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops_,for -- -=--
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human -- -:_ "------
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season. _
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the"top and 'bottom elevations of the -- --
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be - - -
managed to maintain the liquid level -between the markers: A -marker will be required to mark the maximum storage.volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shaH_be-tested -with in_60_days of utilization_and_soil_shall_be-testedat-least-
annually at crop sites where_wasie,products_are-applied 7N trog n*hall_be._the.rate-
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative—�
crop sites shall be used=when°these`=metals_approach_exce: si 6_levels._pH.-shall be adjusted
for optimum crop product=amtmintalned::�Seil--a d--wasteFanalysis-records shall be kept �-�-
for _five (5)-years. Poultry, dry. -shall be maintained three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture -regulations.
* Liquid Systems -_
Page 7 of 9

NAME OF FARM: D G Herring Swine Farm 51-63 :.-; ` i=
------------OWNER-/- MANAGER AGREEMENT
(we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maip�tenahce precedui-ss estalished in the pproved animal waste utilization_plan.for the farm
named above. I (we) }snow that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste _
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment, _
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon r:
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWN : D G Herring ~
SIGNATURE: DATE: q /_
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Barwick Ag Services -
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 103 Country Club Circle
Clinton, NC 28328
[phone] q
SIGNATURE: DATE: �7—
Page 9 of 9

T--S32r r',a •':...'y' ,:.
�� , _ _b• ;:`? x 'E• ;r � �t',"'?' yam, pr
�: }• .s��yt�•' y rr a 'I 2.1,, >t� Y 1'YJuli�.*'
1 + ' '� r r' 7 �•��t ••, • , �. .7ri N"i
� rti�. „,
as „s,n i i'f" ' r►'} t•1':t: t oeff 1.._ '
'.) � ^r. it � :. .';,:.:,...- :.-h�.E;' •� . ,: , , .,
r} 7� 2 I NC U
r.,
�:4lz•j�t,'a4:.,Y' �� ''} ., !r.:�'� 'r`"•� �,�' i^\ !
6 }./ Y •ray Y• 'r !}� ' �",,.J 4,� F
w a xr 'J � `' dt '-' 4T .f .etr i f:' : •, � i �� r �;+
3 V,. SF,n '•r i" i f 1. �� •'.i: •.: i:31, jt J .; t{
,fyy��f•,';.r,. C,� �tir,:�, `iu':'' �`fr6 '� r.s��r�;'•� ��•�f:'1:
� .- r• .1. ':'.iq' fry � " �'' -` .us'�'i;4
,:, � is ,fir„ i - " •,•:, wt. ..•1,..%,
r A,r ,14, ,_•� Ji �� `:.i .'��i _r e'' I I Z • 'r, ,� •v ,�j- •
i • •'irk- ESwb �.r; �Crt_rt�' e:.�":
.K •c• .. ..fla
. vii J
y
5.7'•. i
.1. '�'�� � � I ^yip., .•,• ��
�/% ,.:� ..x �' ! 11.ir' �j� • r.c-,. Ott .
t — -17,
• ; '� �..' .f• •.. .,. f` ter'+ •.•. •... _ • Ma.,
ol
k.. Ew #
`i.

D. G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove, NC 28366
July 25, 2008
Mr. S. Jay Zimmerman, LG
Environmental Program Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section -Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Zimmerman;
In regards to your Notice of Violation of July 1, 2008 for David G. Herring Swine Farm (51-63),
1 submit the following comments:
1. Condition 11.16 regarding 120 inspection documentation; according to the note at the
bottom of the IRR-1 form, "persons completing the irrigation inspections must initial to
signify that inspections were completed at least every 120 minutes'. That initialization
was made by me for each irrigation event. The form does not request an initialization for
each 120 minute inspection. Inspectors from both the Raleigh and Fayetteville office (I
have a farm in Sampson County) have never had an issue with a once per event
initialization signifying compliance. Furthermore my technical specialist, Curtis Barwick,
has stated that both Paul Sherman and Keith Larick have informed him that by initialing
once per event, that the person is signifying that inspections were conducted every 120
minutes. If required, I will initial each 120 minutes.
2. Condition 111.1 regarding inspections of the waste collection, treatment, and storage
structures being performed at least monthly and after each rain event greater than 1".
These inspections were performed but not all were properly documented. I will make
certain that we do not fail to carry out this permit requirement in the future.
3. Condition 111. 3.5 regarding waste analysis within sixty days of the date of application.
A waste sample was taken during the time frame in question but never was delivered to
the lab. This was an over -site on my part and will not occur again. I realize that good
record -keeping practices include having current samples and I will make certain that we
do not miss sampling events in the future. We are now utilizing the collection services of
Dan Bailey with the Sampson County Extension Service so that we are sampling with
the proper frequency.
I hope you see that these were honest mistakes and were not intentional. We do not plan to
have these over -sites occur again.
If you need further information regarding this incident, please call me at [phone]. Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,

�0F W A 74 9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
7006 0810 0002 6050 2988
Mr. David G. Herring
P.O. Box 9
Newton Grove, NC 28366
July 1, 2008
Subject:. NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2008-PC-0432
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Facility No. 51-63
Johnston County
Permit No. AWS510063
General Permit AWG 100000
Dear Mr. Herring:
On May 20, 2008, Jane Bernard of the Division of Water. Quality Raleigh Regional Office
conducted an inspection of the subject Animal Waste Management System. A follow-up inspection was
conducted on June 12, 2008. F. J. Faison, Jr. from the David Herring Swine Farm was present during
these inspections.
Based on information gathered during both inspections, the Division of Water Quality considers
the David G. Herring Swine Farm to be in violation of the following General Permit Conditions:
1: Condition II.16 requires the Operator in Charge or a designated back-up OIC of a type
A animal Waste Management system to inspect, or a person under the supervision of an
OIC to inspect the land application site as often as necessary to insure that the animal waste
is applied in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall the time between inspections be
more than 120 minutes during the application of waste.
During both inspections the 120-minute inspections were not documented for the small
grain crops.
2: Condition M. 1 requires an inspection of the waste collection, treatment, and
storage structures, and runoff control measures to be conducted and documented at
a frequency to insure proper operation but at least monthly and after all storm
events of greater than one (1) inch in 24 hours.
During both inspections all rain events were documented. However, the one (1) inch
inspections required were not documented.
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
NTrt` Carolina
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 �turQ�L�/
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: hftp://www.ncwaterquality.org T7
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Notice of Violation
NOV-2008-PC-0432
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Facility No. 51-63
Johnston County
Page 2
3: Condition 11I. 3.5 requires analysis of the animal waste within sixty days (before
or after) the dates of applications.
At the time of the initial inspection on May 20, 2008, waste analysis for August 22, 2007
covered applications up to'October 21, 2008. Mr. Faison used the analysis for all
applications including the winter small grain crops. Jane Bernard asked Mr. Faison to
obtain a current analysis. The waste analysis conducted on May 22, 2008 will cover
applications from March 23, 2008 thru July 21, 2008. The animal waste that was applied
October 21, 2007, thru March 23, 2008 (5 months) failed to have a corresponding waste
analysis. There were numerous applications made during this time. The time frame
between the two samples would be split in half and PAN re-evaluated for the small grain
crop. During the follow-up inspection the application records were re-evaluated. The
PAN values did not indicate over -application.
During both inspections there were several discussions concerning total liquid application. After
reviewing your Waste Utilization Plan dated April 26, 2005, the total application amount is 1.0". The
current waste plan was not available during the compliance inspections. Condition III.10 requires a copy
of the facility's COC, a copy of the General Permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner agreements,
the CAWMP and copies of all records to be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
, Please respond to this Notice in writing, within thirty (30) days of receipt, and provide an
explanation concerning the above listed discrepancies. The Aquifer Protection Section staff will review
the information submitted and make a determination as to what further action, if any, may be required in
this matter. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Jane
Bernard, or myself at [phone].
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not
more than twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in
accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A.
Sincerely,
S?aZ i merman, L.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor
cc: APS Central Files
TACU Files

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
Producer: D G Herring
Farm Name:
Telephone # :
Type of Operation
D G Herring Swine Farm
P 0 Box 9
Newton Grove,NC 28366
[phone]
Farrow to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals : 625 sows design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop'to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally'iwaste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
MAR 3 0 2009
Page 1 of 9 ---

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
625 sows X 7.3 tons wastelsowslyear = 4562.5 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
625 sows X 6.5 Ibs PAN/sows/year = 4062.5 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE &CLASS -
DETERMINING PHASE
10667
T iH1A
WAGRAM D 6%
10667
- 1HiA
WAGRAM 0 6%
10667
1H16
WAGRAM 0 6%
10667
1H113
IWAGRAM 0-6%
83 136
1H7A
IWAGRAM 0-6%
13683
--�'
1 H7A
LL -
WAGRAM 0-6%
13683
! 1H7B
WAGRAM 0-6%
13683
11-1713
WAGRAM 0-6%
13683
1H8
WAGRAM 0-6%
13683
1H8
WAGRAM 0 6%
CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
BC
SG
BC
SG
4.7
1
-4.7
1
235
50
235
0
0
0
0
0
2.02
2.02
- 4.34
474.7
101
1019.9
MAR-OCT
SEP-MAY
MAR-OCT
50
4.34
-
217
SEP-MAY
BC
SG
--4.7
1
235
50
2.59
MAR-OCT
0
2.59
-608.65
129.5
SEP-MAY
- BG--
4.7
235
0
2.59
608.65
MAR-OCT
- SG
1
50
0
LL 2.59
129.5
SEP-MAY
BC 4.7 --235 0 4.07 956.45 MAR-OCT
SG 1 50 01 4.07 203.5 SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 4448.85
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
" Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
sorne.eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD
10668
1H2
10668 -
1H2
10668
1 H3
10668- }i
1H3
SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
-
W_AGRAM 0-6%
WAGRAM 0-6% _ -^ - -
WAGRAM 0-6%
WAGRAM 0-6%
BC
.7
4.71
235
0
3.58
841.3
MAR-OCT
SG
1
50
0
3.58
179
SEP-MAY
BC
4.7
235
0
4.34
1019.9
MAR-OCT
SG
1
50
0
4.34
217
SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 2257.2
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to averseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP
BC HYBRID BERM LI DAGRASS-CONTROLLE D GRAZED
SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
UNITS LBS NIUNIT
TONS 50
AC 50
Page 3 of 9

i6
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1
15.61
4,449 I
TABLE —2--
7.921
2.257
TOTALS: C - 23.53[ 6,706
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 4,063
-BALANCE -2,644
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 687.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture -
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (inlhr) AMT (inches)
10667
10667
10668
--IHIA,-IHIB
I111A, [HIS
-IH2,-IH3
- -1112, 1H3 -
WAGRAM0-6%
WAGRAM 0-6%
WAGRAM 0-6%
WAGRAM 0-6%j-_ ---- --
SG
BC
SG
-- BC
0.60
0,60
0.60
_ 0.60
*1
"1
'1
10668 _
'1 -
13683
—-IH7A,-IH78,-1H8
WAGRAM 0-6%
SG
0-60
'1
13683
IH7A, IH7B, IH8 T
WAGRAM 0-6%
BC
0.60
"1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 4 of 9

' NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Acreages based on irrigation designs by Tom Crockett Irrigation. Producer has option to
plant and graze millet on Tract 13683 until coastal bermuda can be established. The
application rate is 130 Ibs of nitrogen per acre applied between April 1 and August 31. Rye
for grazing can follow millet. The application rate is 90 lbs of nitrogen per acre applied
between September 1 and April 30.
Page 5 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to property dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
himther the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference: -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
Page 6 of 9

, 5
and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*1 B. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms,
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis..to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept ob'site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 7 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
Liquid Systems
Page 8 of 9

NAME OF FARM: D G Herring Swine Farm
OWNER 1 MANAGER AGREEMENT
(we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estaiished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: D G Herring
r
SIGNATURE:�'� DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
SIGNATURE:
please print
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharie Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
J (9 0) 59 1122
SIGNATURE: / DATE:
Page 9 of 9

rY,,
JWA
Y f�
�� � lr r ',i• j 1 �.
,•'�i,Sl ' -44-
t } 4•".i,..
i11+,1's� �y 4 fu, � ... { Y �t6 7 r6 ye t It . fi'.
'i. �i 1 4 Yi �( :_ � ? a1J �( �' "-+S*�j � r i�•iI� 1 ' isit l,x LR �{ t � "�_ -
tarw+rf"il'9,
^�,.+il.'! s 'r r -_1w ,r � ��� ti.`y s^t �� '�1•r'�� � f 1, ��t' �L.,h�+�•y 7./ 1:; }� tix1�(�'
f'1Yi >
CiK!;�. i�r� 'f ^id Jl'P• - { Sr Jf
A,
IN
Vj
a $ � 1 r � - i _ � •._I: �titi .'.�.� � - i � r , J F}J r�Sw y
r = t — it it , f �4. > ,K•n y ,Y '
` J � r. ; -- _� 1. �-- ._ — .ai, t�,.r�1 Ir cif p� ,, •I
4 W nia"a; {I w F
* 3
Ali)71
3.1
T`
yoVIAz 1
p4.I r.✓4 1 G.
j !2!
27
keft
f,
. Nut
f z
.... ...:L IAA

J
a � T` Give '�rel;eec!'?t `here€.:was-.'res�ar; �,-`' f — ,... - -;:., .. - _':I
rBa'ysam,if,
_.._�.. _ ,. _- s�;_a'rraR i FIEEFII of� 5anpso�
�"", •�•- Y - ~ '!:+�F� K ��.. +.Y" L5>ri??'� S"�.:•i
CauntyrP Qit ,> 'araLrrrar -,.Pa> ty a� then-Secanapac� arrdv sonreCime e e etarheretn ; ' jfSflI
Y f
a� ; Lessees �p r _
I E�:' t E si s✓jl� r li_ _ u� a w
.. - T�Ta;t_•'S[ltf7eL!_'ta�t:he: terl^S;anD;..Coad:FC70RS,.IIE e:Tftdt:efr;Set~LOCCl�- tlTe#lleS5QG5:� },
%V6 -�••+slti.t�.�
' �; � day-hereE�yr-;let=.>and`'Te�se� ttt salfd Lessees anr>h the• Lesse daes here���accep:t�as�tenan� � ,�
' -' - — - � tit �<=.-}e-. r .c.aY•r�y4`•� ;.;r :.=' .- .,1 - Fa.- '' p .. �::-r•.:'-` �_-' a,l' ^; I
+!'..-� - _ �,,;.a - _-5+•'ra- ' }=�"x4T�?�.y tea,
:h sa Tdxa essays; a LT. cl'eare l arty Tacxted :upar�that pareeiv re�ette;stf:u> trlr,
$errtaaVil rTe^Fovensftlp„ Jahrrstarc Co¢ne� iror:�:Caco;Frira: mcce pa•-LtcrnFacFy desccz�ed y -M �, j
' a5>_ fO,T'ToYiS= �•. - - 1 � L `� "r� J-ti' � -'- �-�!
:
BECN(a2`T 6 acres more or Tess" a:s s'-owm arr a;.map< thereof enti tled: : "Surreyf
oi'- the- G_ G_ Adaursand-'S&I-lie: 1�_ Adams.P.efr- Rropecvc' (Raynae Farucir;;`: pre�iared:"iz •. �<., w.:
Warrick Errg'irreer-ing: & Sur-vey.in¢a P�_ A_,.: dated•Aprrl 3G, T9aQ"an reccrr�ed~ trGlfap;.: _ - __
Boo!c 33 at Page` 3� of the: ioirnstors Coar.t Re=si:try said maa be inc_irrcnrparated - _' l
hef-atn: and.. by: reference made & pare hereo
The- terms'and: ccaditions or this are as_-i=ol.lows_
. I. T`R P_ Tn is lea5e= she r 1L�R a:IC: r:?3a_r end,, LILTa S_..
11 be^in 4s o- ia.^uar, 1_-_
_,.orjE!7 tarILM&t`<l as. here'irr- providEd orr ue'_e': 2 i 2� !
G_ ,�iEill pLcin¢ the -First i'1'!e-vc: s or tale' t"'"Cr t.`:e= i eSSa�- Sh-,'.V pal- tz7_ -
t!:� LE-E- ors: ari: annua:l-reita:1 or• Sa=.OQ pe_--a for-aIl' Cleared: iaaa: iCcitad.-uporL' 1
sa.ie premises:_ payadle_ annually' irr advar.ca-
Uur. i na., the: secend:. f ive- ( E) year- te. the. anrual: renca j sha:i.T-. be-S7.Ma per -
ac:7 they third-f=rve- (5} year.terar: 5l5_GU per-acr. _ and: tile_ FourttG>civew(5:)::year _ ::•:: -:
ter�� the-sulrmo1 58f) 0O: Per-acrE---fcc &IL c:eire^_• lanL Iacater`uporr-smfdi=prestises.-payakl
annua i.ly,:. im. adrance-
PURPOSE -AND- USE-- Tiris.leaser:is_c.-zr.tew for- acric:.citural;purpasas-;� 1neTu¢i7mm-
ne- ratiwingY.a= crops ands the right. ta: use sEid_ pre^ii;se�.f the disposal
�•y., '.
w45t� dCiSTn-rrcmthe`opera.ti0ncot'd:':SYiine' TdC'-•Lttf'_
COMPErAMCEWITFt E11W fRUNt1EN'TAr ra-'the+. spreadTnm of the- was:te~:herel:rlr
ccntemp.]'a ed`,:. the-_ lessee- sha:l-I'� dt all . Cia;es�compl}:. w,i CK:atT_ Toca:l„ State�:and FederarL='= _4
en•r.ironmeatLL law•s_ ruXes-, and_ re-u.la.ticrL_ _
C~_ ASSCGNMENT- TM!r Tease pray- be asaicnee• by- the L-essea-_ but only*. Fac-
purpsae=•hereimre.evred to:__:
6'_ VIOCAT=TOlr'OFTERMn Upon therv.icidtierll.0F the! ta:-rsaf tlri's-Tease"by>
e?the:-parch'heretrn,. tne-other part. shall nar� t e rigor to pursu surtr.iecaL,_.. ~_ !
and equi taa-Ter remedies as: eac!r may, be-enc ti;r
T . APPURTENAiiCY:_ ribs lease:' sila_l l- to cnL i ` i herehr declare Ca be.
ocu.torarrw to::tlTaC 30-acre- trdcC: owned: :-e 1_ess2a and-kife describer in=the=
deek to. the: frerz SaI.iie L- F:damC dcted: iL.:e =-•. I4c"T and recorded' it 3eolc 10E=C
r c
pace- 3C5 of the- Johns con' Countf Re^_. St'r, __!C Cee± beinr,. incor,-cr_:'2 hereirr and 5:
Y'e4Are9ce: made= a. port hereof.
- � I
�`-_ -ha -- ,- -- - . _ _ :,ne sec � _ -a•,} net_�a
an4
C l i n tca, riGC_,M _
_ J
lnls ,nscrnme:rc prepared br n.rrrr
♦ �� L I
'.: �+[•'xSit:wi�nY`-':.�,iq leq �hn r-. _ . ' - -� •-.ram. - _.` -` / _ .'-�`*!
r L3s9c ,:a/'.tf! ~�•.a:. 1.r._. � .. -•d ,S%f'�'rr '. s' ..'izr.•-.� �

AM fates at"'ther f icsv part and~ sometsme� reTerred to hererin aessa, an
:L• j y"�^ ? OELuiR�C NF_RRIN ai 5ampsarri CauntF Harttr CarcTrna party a the�_secarr paMand ` r
`�"-.f--'tti"•a-.i-�. r:S•
y+ " � ' r, sonetTmes referred Ca_ihereim as Lessee� - � r
sVF*TN;t ETFfr_ r _ "C,s'
� 7 - .
shre,€terefuTfrat subvje=tat thE_ ta*s andCotn, itrttf L ss
{•� �,�i;'a: �' x'e�'�a.�.�7`-"`.., ca ,,- �. : '- - .. -,_-.-?- .. _�'�-'.-:.... , .-'-=�. :- �c�..,'�:.%.•„-ram » ...
ebyr:let_.anti; Tease<toesa:t Carse°ranocthe Lessee does here5y�=acceei asrterraRt ,
�- o,=:said-LessarsaLLicleare+~Tar. race teorupon.�Oat parceol r al<eatesttuate'rrE_
8etttonvri Tl ti.Town5tirr,'JohnstomCaurrtr.,� Na ttilCarvl_insmore• particLaTaa desci ibex' --
1 J 1
BEING.5ar' acre;,. nor° or less,.descriiied: as ."Share How Three- T-raetQne�:fm tiff.
Reuort of ConmiSS- orre7s appairrte.� t�r dfuide'- tare Tandy of Murre . H=:Aernfg-arr;; deceased:,.
c retard--frr. Frio, EE'-5-D-1i:. in the-c-ffffce of the, UerL--o=Superior_ Count ai Johnstera
County,. North-Carol:irra,. said=. repr= betnm%irTccrperater* hereirr, and-by=reference grade
a_ part: hereof_
The terms and: c_-ncitiens. c= ,.ms leasa: are- as ro r I(:Ws_
1 _ TERrr- i ;s ie_sc sha': T be..ir as: c� Januarr l,. 159�-. anu shaIl.T 2.'I(-T7,. unless
scene~- terminated.' as. here*- prov.idem on: decemcer 31,. 2UO5_
�i
2_. RENi- Durir,c the: firs five, {5; y2yrs:of tne-tamr the Lessee--sh 1L pay,,�fI
to t^e Lessors ar annua:i rental c: S63-GG per- ac-e• for al i cleared•°lands located,
uaorr said ace -rises,. said--rental.-to:-ale-paic:.annua=l.Ty.-in-ad)fanctra= CO 25�?ES�
Ou-rina_the'seccudzf_ive:-{E):yea. z=termra�this iese,=meannaa�'rerrtal`strazlT~6e
S6-Gaper-.acre for- a�lLclearew lard Tecatedupomsaic.presriseT.paxaaTe^ nnuml.Ty~�irr_7-
3"_ ' FURPQSE A? G� USE Tni�: ieasz'.is_ erarrtec" `ar acr-t=I.tt raT Rar�ose� irrcFLA-Frm-l:"
the: croming:-ai= crops'anmthL-- r.iah= to: user_saTd_- premises for- the-dispasaT'o anYmarl
waste!:artF_ing fr.crwthe aperatiar oE`assieiner: facHit_r_
44_ Tn� the` spreadTrTo-Qi the4wa�stesherefm-''- -
cantem[r.l ate��- tne• Lessae shall ,_ at a:i i : tines„ canaiy. >Mi fir. a TT lava=i;., State:: ands Fede �i..
enrironmenta:lJ•]aws�.ruies:•ar.d=.regalations� - -_ - ..
c_ ASSM'IMEl i _. i r:i-, .lease- mar be-- assigned: bw_ the Lessee, but=crely� far the
pu rpasesy her.e:i rr rererred•. to-_ - -• - -
.4_.- VFaC:A:rFCt�OFTi_Rlf�_ Uoo. t:le-vic.latior: o� thry te:�r�.of r�:wle��z~ay^
a tier partr here�a,, rre` ocher-par-cr steal T hare- t.-e ric:zi tc- purs:;E-- S rc--legaT
ard: egOt7ab;le: remedies as each: ma;Ybe: entitled..
T. APPUF.TE'1ANCf. This lease stall be -and it 1S ,le.^¢3r dEc:a: =tG be
aacurtenanL t6 Clat IC- acre- cwnaLr 6v the: Less2a 3no—wif& cas=ibe in- Cha_
deed_ Co therr frcn Sa+• i tc L_ Adams date^ June- 2%„ I4ET aca reccr"s" iT Ecek 1054- a
aBCc of tUe cnrstcr. CounC! =_cast .r,. said deep h2lr. ircorpc- .ec he-arr ar,4 t%
re'•=�e CE made a pa, . n_r_...
'r TF.T.:1e rl'` :- _ _ ; inC `--=-=nc
hone_. a u, . _„ _ '� c v :n: __..-
C_ .%5n IQd rr/
This irstrumenr_preparec7bTrarrnAttorne)-atLawr,CTintnrr;,Mo�t

16:25 FAX 910+394+0235 GIs OF `C
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed or,iv if addirienal land has to be leased, etc.)
I, �. J , 1�G`lS �� , Jr_ hereby give dc5i._ v�" r'r;
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System right up next to
my property line without regards to buffers for the duration of Time -shown below.
The property line on which waste can be applied is shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I aiso
understand that the use of waste .`Jill reduce my ne fci cvr T-,erciol fertilizer.
Adze. Landowner ' �— Date:
7 1
-
Waste Producer: ��—�'' Date:_f�
' 1
Technical Representative: �U V�Late:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Aareement: 19i' d to 63q,
(,K.inimur_+ c_` ier. Years or cs5r- siiarad Icce.ms)
(See Recv� ed Nc . ... )
Notary

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
hereby giveiCL-�v'��`��
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System right up next to
my property line without regards to buffers for the duration of time shown below.
The property line on which waste can be appiied is shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrocen, phospho.rus, potassium,, and other
trace elements and when properly applied not harm ray lard or crops• i also
understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertiiizer.
Adjacent Landowner �� �q CLu^-� 1�f��-L�.;'��. Date: I1`.1L-�,%
T J
Waste Producer: Date:
i /'
Technical Representative:��� Date: / cM
SVJCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: /- 7o_-R , 19 67 to a
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
r (See Required SoecI_=iCazicn Nc. 2.)
CC CIS Cl-
7

NORTH CAROLINA L E A S F
JOhNSTON COU111Y
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, made this loth day of April, 1996 by JEFF ADAHS and wife,
MIRIAM ADAMS now or formerly of Johnston County, North Carolina, parties of the first
part and somat.imes referred to herein as "Lessors"; and DAVID G. HERRING of Sampson
County, North Carolina, parlay of the second hart and sameWnws. referred Lo herein
as "Lessee".
W 1 T N E S 5 E T H:
That subject 0 the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Lessors
do hereby let and lease to said Lessee and the Lessee does hereby accept as tenant
of said Lessors all cleared land located upon that parcel of real estate situate in
Bentonville Township, Johnston County, North Carolina more particularly described
as follows:
BEING MY acres, more or less, as shown on a map thereof entitled: "Survey
of the G. G. Adams and Sallie L. Adams Heirs Property (Raynor Farm)," prepared by
Warrick Engineering E Surveying, P. A., dated April 30, 1990 and recorded in Map
Book 33 at Page 321 of the Johnston County Regsitry, said map being incorporated
herein and by reference made a part hereof.
fhe Lr'rro_ owu� of thi�.. ors. a�'
I. Ii.RP1. This lease shall hugin as of January I, 1991 and 0611 end, unlast.
sooner to Ri&YO os herein provided on Opcerber 31, 2017.
f on Dor ivy the f ir',I. livc (f 1 , of the term, the Lennue sha11 pay Lu
Lhu Lessups yin nouo i rental of IuS= pat acr u Mr all nloor-ed land 1ur-a0d: Up""
said pr'evisen 1iavokly annual ly in advanc .
During the second five (5) year term the annual rental shall he '$70.00 per
acre, the third five (5) year term $75.00 per acre, and the fourth five (5) year
terns the sum of $80.00 per acre for all cleared land located upon said premises payable
annually Q advance.
3. PLIR4'0SE AND USE, This lease is granted fnr agricultural purposes, including
the growing of crops and the right to use said premises for the disposal of animal
waste arising frum the operation of a swine facility.
4. COMPLIANCE WITH FNYIRDNPIENTAI LAIJS. In the spreading of the waste herein
contemplated tl,e lessee shill, sat all times, comply with all local, State and Federal
environmental laws, rules and regulations.
5. ASSIGt1MENT. This lease may be assigned by the Lessee, but only for the
purpsoes herein referred to.
6. V)OLAT10N OF QMC• Upon the violation of the terms of this lease by
either party hereto, the oLher party shall have the right to pursue such legal
and equitable remedies as each may be entitled.
7. APPURTENANCY. This lease shall be and it is hereby declared to be
appurtenant to that, 30 acre tract owned by the Lessee and wife described in that,
deed to them from Sallie L. Adams dated June 22, 1987 and recorded in Book 1059 at
Page 805 of the Johnston County Registry, said deed being incorporated herein and
by reference made a part hereof.
IN TESTiMONY WHEREOF, the parties of the first and second part have hereupLo
set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. `�h
(]el F c Lessor
2
f,� tCi
This ins tvuwenL prepared by Harry M. Let', Attorney at Law, Clinton, Norry�l�:rl�i�, 8-

AIN
SEAL
Fliviam Adams, Lessor
David G. I lyr'rrng, Lessee
rI�TII CAP01. i PIA
�!'�'_�r} Ur -- CDUPITY
a Notary POI IC in and fur sa}d County and State,
do hereby certify that Jeff Adams and vrife, i irianr Admis, each personally appeared
before nre this day and acknowledged the due executinn of the foregoing instrument
for the purposes expressed therein.
Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this day of April, 1996
No-t4�� ' Pul> Sc
fiy
rlllltlll r'.Al;nl I PIA
9
SAMPSCM COUIITY
ra No Lary Public in and for said County and State,
do hereby certify Plat David G. ilerring personally appeared before vie this day and
acknowledged the due execution of the forecloiny insl.rumenL for thie purposes expressed
therein. NRD
Willies my hand and Notarial Seal this jclay of Atlril,�k�7
My Commission Expires:

a
NORTH CAROLINA
JOHNSMN COUNTY
The foregoing certificates of �zc cue _�� �44-a Notary Public in
and for _-- 1(� cy County, North Carolina; and ------------- —T
a Notary Public in and for Sampson County, North Carolina are certified Lobe correct.
This instrument was presented for registration this day and hour and duly recorded
in the office of the Register of needs of ,lohnstor Counl:y, North Carolina in
Book _/ S12_ at Page S
This 1-7 day of l 1996, at 10' 3 o'clock
NuTrnstn County %ejister UU/eeds
Qy:�_�J
As i Uut/Oepsty

Swine Farris Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
— So11i'ce
f3[1"11`s [u fllilriulii.c U[iur -- — - Site ,5liccilic f'I acticl's
1 k(IIIIS(CmI
Swin:lilu([ucliull
ygelulivu or wooded U[I[I"cls;
f�1'�/lZcculrllllcntic[1 �csl ill; UIPCHICIlt lll,lclicc';
f�f l ivncl jull� ll]Cnt ;In[l comIllul] st:usc
)lni]n,Il liu{ly Sul I:Irrs
I)ilE ' ]uai]Inc-cuvci(:+l :ulilu;sfs
C: Ury lluuls
l lunl sullaccs— - -
- Wd mallurc-cuvcle[l,luuls
F�'limu I fluuls;
r_� l`f;lcci[Is 1(icatc[I ul"cl sl[iuC(I,1{I{71,:;
i
[1I/'lcdel- ;I[ i]igh cn(I ursuli(I Iluu]e;
111MMlc i1iil(1u1111V111 HOOPS,
,C�'7//),Clallc
�T lJIl11CIiIVilf 1'CIIIIiS111Ut1 lfl]�(.�I)'lll�
11I;1muc C[]IICCII[III l71[s
• th7111';
[ f'i'C[hlCllf I11:II1lIIC rCIlkuVal b}' f141s11, lilt il'CbaIgC,
• I'alti lE nliclubial [Icculufx];iliull
OF scl;lpc;
t..11llll'I[I{InrVCltlllall[ill
��CII[il;ill(IEI C\halls[ Ions
• VUI;111fC Ca l'S;
III:]IIl(ellu]SCI-'; ~-- ---
Mim
,,_ /r/7,11i
LW I;Elllll'llI :ill' lil[11'l'I]IClil "
l iltll]lll-sill l;icce
• I)lEs[
c `�.Isll[l[11vil VCl4HCC]1 g2ok11;5
l-Cc(I HdditivCs;
4.- '
ldI'CC(1C1- c(IVCIs; Y
/)
C'iK
i'cc[I dcl ivciy [Iwyllspolii C;([C 1dcl's to (Cedul- IV1/-{
CVVCIS
l.-lusll [ailks
Agilalinn VVICCyClc[I klguou
Cl F[usb lank covers;
liquid whilc [;inks arc filling
Q EXICn[I [Ill IiIICS [V ucajbullulli of [;IIIks hill]
:ll]6-Siphon VCllls
1 Ill;h aIIC)'s
Agilat1Un during Sv;IClCw{ flCI
,�,
E-4-�'Uodcrllow this ] 3villi 111i(ICI llom- vcwil;l[IV11
Cfllll'C}':IItCti
Pit lcd1;ni,C 1)vints /��ila[iun uf"lcc)'c[ct[ lagoon
h(lui[I 1rhilc 1)i,s ;IIC fillilIg
l..ifl sklliulis Agila,ivn (lul ink; sun]I) Ellin
IillinZ an[I (1r: Vd(lll'll
Uu[Si'jc (lralll Cul1CCllllll rlgit;itiun during wastcwa[cr
nr (HICOun I7U\C$ Collvcyaucc
AMOC - HuvcIIlbcl I I , 191)G, i';lgc 3
Cl [ix[Crl(1 rcciml8c fines to nc;lr bullunt of []ifs
will] ;]nO-sillburl vcllls
Ci 13ox cuvc;s

sowme
(Ause
BMIN to Minit"Ke (Hine
Sit(- 5jj?Ui liL- I t I k- 11 C L' S
. ..... i -
• -fi l,- II,- , I I -'r , i,-,,nage;
I ;LI C ', I I I ( I lil—m(mit-, V—, I - .-"i l, q -
-, --, --- - -
M
Iloill k1cilhicscluaiccollillos(ollil
F\ -h —m I. I -,TI Fr.-, I, cx-li k IF, (o—•
NUO)' lHainta41c(F;—iLccss
low bile
JiLMNC WMk hOM hIfIll
0
;ICCUSS
/Wditillird IIIIIIIIII;fliusl 7
wwwAsS, t-' I 'I I DWI 6 6, RII IV/l i ;Y'l P 1""; 1 C, 1--, C
Swillu Pwiluoitill FmIll 1'4,1clihill U(lur SMIICCS MIll RCHICtliCS ; E-MAl', kicl Slicel
`;wine PIMILICli011 1063Y Nh"MC NOUTemmo: Ph Rudull!"C - 1,;11"ilml "I luallilell( ; 1-d1r1E I
itt Inc I'lodoctioll ladmy Nonmu K"mgmumo: thda lkmr Fhsh - lagmm licah"m ; IWAF NTT'.
[,:W()0II JkSi�,lll all(I HMMICHICIlt NIS Live-auck fvl;ll[Lllc Tic;I1111cilt ;Intl Slmqc ; F.HM-. 101-83
C;IlJ)I;IlikpII III I11;IIlIIIc :Ind \%'w;(cNv;0ur A1i111ic;i1imi Fquipmcul F;ic: Sliccl
kAmwQN% twms liven swine BAWhIgs ; NH-33
Assmonuc Pioi-,rmu ; 1,11TC Hanmil
ykno hw MawThIg ( Mw ; a IqWO hNII OW SIX&C UAW 10k 1ALC
I luismict, t.'oucciiis in Aniimll N'1;111111C Odul!; ;111(1 Hics, ; PK0101, 199-5 CollIcIc.occ Pluccc(li"T';
AMUC - I lovcIlIlIcl 11, 1996, P;19c 5
I - I i t\ I -'.
I
Id(-'SU Awj 'mmoonicolii-w'

Insect Control Cl oddist for Animal Operalions
('.muse f1f111's (n CIIIIlrol 1i15C1:l5 tiilc SE1er.ific f'rarliccs
t,irprid Syslcnis
FbIsI1 (i,sin, c,t Accalnkdillion ofsnlW Flash system is designed acid oheraled
surliciewty to remove accnnuilated solids from
gllllcrs as designed.
PP-1(cinove bridging of arcumttlaled solidsal
rliseharge
I.ilLI)IJIn and Ills • Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, sc dhj Basins and Ails where
hest breeding is apparcnl to minimize lite co rl
crusting of solids to a depth "no more than C -
f1 inches over more than :30% of surface.
I: lcsslL' `'cl;l:1,11ivc • Dccilying vet;c;talioli vet,eudive COMA iltont" hanks 411
C• 6 O
t irclSclh lagoons and other impound nails to prevent !
accmindmimi of decaying vegewtive matter
atom; w:ltcr's edge on impokuulmen!'s perimumr.
my Systems
FCC([ Spillagc Cl design, operate and 111:1iu1"lin fcc d systems (C.g-,
hankers and Ironghs) to minitnirc Ilse
acclnnrdalion of decaying wastage.
fl Chan „1i spillage on it rominc basis (c.g., 7 - 10
clay interv:ll dm inl; sanlnn:r; 15-30 day inlcrval
drirlilt; ivinwr).
Accuniolalions off IcSidllcs — (hick rllnitifm accllIIIIII dial{ wilhin and
around 61111 :diale lwl inwict. of Iced Storage
areas by inr;nl iag d1ainal;c away from site
and/or providinl; adccloalc comairinlcnt
covered bin for bic4vcl's I;rain and sinlihn hil;h
nrni:;tarc, l;raiu lundirr.t::).
f 1 Entillucl for- and rcniov,: or breml; olt acclllilalawd
solids in filic:!' smps ammi l Ievil sluraj!,c ms
nretlr.d.
AI'd 11' - tluvCtnhcl t 1, t`1116, Page 3

i
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAID
OHCNE NUMSGZ7117 l7T 'pf f l�
DtryQ S1 C- .!Vd
,z
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYS = 91 9-989-5050
SWCD 919- 989-5381
MRCS 919- 989-5381
This plan will he imDlenented in she eOent chat wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, cr running cf
s1Es. Ycu should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that Vol: Have a rablsm,
You should every T ens; � - this s THY,.
t ol.. ._cuya make e rer� effort to ensure ... L-_G L [�l� C-
ha pen. This plan should be basted in an accessible
location for all emoloyees at the facility. she fc11cw_na
are some action items you should take. ~
1. stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may cr may nct he possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed Relc+7.
A. Lagcon cverf low-passit i e sc l utic are:
Add
soil cc
term zc fncraas
a elavazlzr _ « da . .
.... F u:l p
wastes
o Maids - _ an
G._.. apza.,.. _ ,.. race.
stop sL�
r+
all flows
Lam. ... sa lac-..cm
-...w.G._A--.. .
--
— Call
C pumping
C'cn Z_ ac _.._ .
C . Make
sure no
surface wa sap
is an `-"- i.'q - ' -Ct,...
Runoff from waste application field -actions
incline:
a. immediately stcp waste a;ylicaz_cn.
t. Create a temporary di ersici c cc? ail ..aszs.
C. incorporate Grate waste no reduce _ .-... _ - f .
d. Evaluate and eliminaze the _ -cscn (v) zAa7
caused the runot=.
here runoff occurred.
C: leakage from the waste Ces and
include.
_.wumz-
Ezzz irrigamiln FUT .

t J
U)
4
U1
It
rt1
,1
hlI
ul
E i
Ill
44 1
UI
E},
'tl
Ul
>,
0.
Sf�
•-1 Ilr
[:
ZJ
•rl
Ul
U`
rll
Ql
-I .fl
r0
1;
'O
UI
U
+1 r
r_t
t, ,t1 •• rl
f
•Ij
. I
!
.-1
C r[
[J,
S.:
1 ;
I)
U,
:•,
I`• '(j
;,f
[II
I
t ;
i 'r) IIf
V
•c-
U)
1J
O
O t7,
.r; [;
u
to
'[1
U
(U
0.;
SU
11!
IJ
U)
�I
fI
tofu
IJ
�[
rl
10
'
1-:
(11
.1,
nl
1-1 'f.J
I!
ul
_.
UI
Ql
VI
O
U C.3
1.-;
-1 I
•7
,-[
.f.l
I t
.1�
[lf IU
UI
[ ;
III t :• I [,
I : 1
[1)
44 rA
U lU
r l
i.1
.[-,
Il
,
I.t
r i
.? UI
[il0
1 .- I
l 1
[
1 [
CI•,, r f
U
[I) U]
44
(
it
I}.SI
[}} fl1
[.,•
r5.-r
ql
Ct ,
PI I [, I tl
O
,171
11
t)
,-1 C)
[ : i 1,
al
1
'-I
I
IU
I
'[J
t f I
r
11 I I
UI
S;
1rl
aI
I i;, .It I Iji
+iI I II Ll
1[
'1 V
t!
r11-1
It Ii
t!
�I
I
r :
t)
I.:
Ill
to q}
'I
J.r
V1 ••
U
S-7
to
'Lf
1.1 j
I t
di
U
)!
Ul
(J IJ
Uf
IU
Ul bl _J
O
a)
U
O
al il!
-'-I lT,
'IS
;-,
'I,$
r I
:>
lit
tP
lu
1
a
:i •, t�1 I
'
�,
.0 U]
[ll
.[}
1'.
-•-I
r-I
U) IU
•>
Ill
Il) 0, [),
(1
...t
(I •-I 111
1r
4J
J.:
C IJ
�.I
+ O
! [ ,-,
rJ
rU
4J
(
,-i
-,.I
CJ'
:> I
to
t5l
rU [17 W
[:
u)
IIl
U)
[: I � nJ [=
�,
U
a.],
Ul
U t2
EU
U]
IU
'[]
U]
f� _['
,[,
U1
r-I
�}
sU
rU
r I rJ
ul
N'
,.0
(], �(
Ul to
�,
N O
�t
5 (n
u)
;7
ul
I
[l)
[
Ct
t_
(u
[1 [1
u
-L" .[:
rU l- .{J
,y
,—I
I
•�I
U
rrl �'1 .[: -L
n � n (,,
•.
,�
C
t
)a Jl
O
—I lr
U
rU
J7,
.1
C:
C:
U] U]
O ill
V)
u1 t)
U
lJ
:' e
U1
u,
��
U)
(U (U
[ll
ri
CAO
� O
-O
U]
O O
-1-! (U
rU
a) to
:mt
•.-I
1-1Ul
—I
rlf �?
�.(J
fll Itf
Itl
it
(`•
P1
I
.0
—I
U)
N 41 V:
_Cl
-I ;J
qY
a
f':
II
I
q.r
ql U
�a
[!!
•-I
4� l�
U Ul
Ua
Ilf .A
,A L), O
,-1 ul
l
r11
tll
:-1'I
r3
r
ti
IIJ
;>
U
)S .t:
(Il
U) —I
[••
1�
>, UI
r3f
.[) III SI ,
�I
N
U
tl tU
>,-,-I
C1 J4
N
it r-1
R,r-f
N
ro • �
IU
i3a
'`
. I
J.I
4.t
l} ,
aJ
[J
❑r I
U • 1 . I
(1)
1,
U)
a ,
rU
:?
1! .c:
f r U
(}
V]
to
U]
C� C1a .f
O [U
l: N
tJ}
U
fJ,
[I)
Ilf
�'
IJ �t
C
)-a �I - !
N
nS
•, I
I t s
�1
N V1
}J -•-I
Ui to
it
O
� N N
UI
11)
0
U
.--I
01
Ul Ul
C], I O,
(J
.I�
[t)
p, [I}
1.1
lI
l: r l
1
w 14
'TJ ..-1
44 to
C.
IU --1
C .-1
U 0
(?
u)
"J
to
-• [
•[�
1)
a)
Ul
Cl, U}
--I
J
rU
t
() S t
nl
J.r t
ru
O
1l, ❑,
(1) Q,
�•-t rlJ
al
U
) I
:
u)
ul
.,.I
u,
y
rU (
la U)
ru
C)
1 I
[J
, , [
❑,
N
[) O
�C O
I--i Cl,
N Ul r--[
Cs, iJ
.L:
0)
.t
I-}
u)
Ul
v
r.; rj
U
to
U a)
rl)
n, .C'
N
I I I I , ,';
[Ff
U, N
JJ aJ
IU 41
O (U
U,-,A j�
-t J
IU 4-I
aI
•-t
,>
rl1
(II
••I O
f
Ul .[::
[ to
tU
U
Vl
v
'U] 1L
.t-;U
r;y :-) •-t
to
'iJ
(1)
O
a) _UJ
CO,
`fu N (A
,
V (.1]
Ul JJ
S-I '�1
rla
:
m Cl,
N -A Ul)
aJ
)a rU
r-1 UI
rll .-r
'I I
IJ
I : • I I i1
Ul
'IJ a1, !1
:`
•-i 'U tU
l-f �
la
Ul
"x
rl
al -, ,,, r ,
to .(_t
U 'U
al
F-I 41 [l,
10
�.)
V)
co
a)
U,
S f 1,
L.] 'Zj
(.
'•-I -. f U
•>
.[�
ri;
ri;
Cl C]
U
Ul
'T!
S)
Q)
N
1
..
U)
J-1
f I
VI
rU
{ )
'I) [l)

Z" Inc_lenc from imem ! ahcve, the exact _ccaWLc:.
of the facility, the locaricn or dirsscion. of
movement of the spill, iieaz_^_cr and inn c^%G_=_cns.
The corrective measures Lhac have been Ender zken,
and the seriousness cf the s'_c. c.cfcn.
I. 1- spill leaves proper y or, enccrs surface race_-
call local EMS phone number c __ -989 -- 5050.
C. instruct. EMS to contact iccal Health Cepar menz.
d. Contact. CES, phone number 919-989-5380, local S CC
office c.ncne number 919-989-5381, and lack! _VRyS
offices Or advice/technical assistance pi_Cne _.... hEr
919- 989- 5381_
4: if none of the above works call 9,? or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies fcr you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin recan.
of problem to minimize off -site damace.
A
c. Contact the technical specialist Hh_ cerW__-ec the
1 awccn (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc. )
a. Name
Chris S.QI l tr2
nCnE: 919 989-5381
7: implement procedures as advised ty Tn0 and tec^___ca-
assistance agencies to rectlf_ the damage, repair Me
system, and reassess the waste management e_nt plan 4_ ke='
problems with release c; :tastes ==cm happening again.

Mortaiit-v Manage!e:it Methods
E'urial Cif 2 Cam.._ beneach r; e surface & the gouna ..'lei::;! 14 fours 02.
kno«'ledso ci chz T e buh l MOZ be at Way 100 00 NOM any 00i
stream or oubiic bOdv cr' <<a.e.-.
0 e� � a� - -
!� nd .:�`? ai � : n�__ing ri�.l_ ll:vi:_e�� �.._�. C'.�. l�C•- _..
COMpleie InCicle'2Lion %7�ps d/)C' 6r ]ItveC�
J In t1he case of dead pouit,: only. placi::n is a dis esai nit of a ;izc and de i
appmved by the Dena; t rLnt or Agi"icuiture
I :�riy MP-:hcd which In the proicssion'al of the Scat `eterinarlan �vCt::a
make possible the salvage or part of a �_ad animai's va:u. .v�:hout
human or animal heart:,. (� ciltzn the Sate VcterinaFian musi .0e
auacAeul

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
David G. Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
POBox 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510063
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear David G. Herring:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to David G.
Herring, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510063 which expires October 1, 2004,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the David G. Herring Swine Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 625 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone; 919-733-3221 1 FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.en r. state.nc. us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
,Xaturallry

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510063
APS Central Files
i1

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j t^ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
5w, Division of Water duality
May 1, 2003
David G. Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510063
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear David G. Herring:
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste- Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to David G.
Herring, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510063 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the David G. Herring Swine Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 625 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and.
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. A
lV ENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr,s1ate.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
L/
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510063
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment and Natural Resources WATER QUAUTY SEC 110N
Division of Water Quality JUL 1 91999
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form.
(THIS FORM h1AY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operaticl%Discnarge Permiliing
The following questions have been completed utilizing information -on -file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corredibns that are appropriate.If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered. ; I 'E
MAR :. 7 2000
1. GENERAL INFOIMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: David G. Herring Swine Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: David G. Herr
L3 Mailing address: PO Box 9
City, State: Newton Grove NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 594-1359
Zip: 28366
u14I,E
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): I mile down 1002 cast off of 701 north of Newton
Grove
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (ifdifferent from Land Owner): AIRI ta--� zep-r-r SA ZtK,S.h.t1.l._ ...
1.7 Lessee's I Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): GIS
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 0 1/0 1/89
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: __51(county number); _ 63 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descriphon_: Swine operation
Farrow to Feeder
625- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? M yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
0 Beef
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 1
51- 63

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 14.28 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 14.28
2.4 Number of agOon5 storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or OD (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
ES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 198%
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? Jg88
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.I 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
A P14
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 51 - 63

RECEIVED
Vf IATER Ql, IP-' di' SEC -,"ION
Facility Number: 51 - 63 �JU 9 E`J��
Facility Name: David G. Herring Swine Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: Note -Discharge Petmitung
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for __tS _C —H E R mat C- Sw toF. EAA (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. l under —stand that if all required parts of this
application are not completedAnd that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to ye as incomplete.
Signature
Date 7 - 1 L - 57 `i
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, ZSGo:[ -c AfiKS6t.j (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for—". HE0a w,. (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be reWmed as incomplete.
Signature
Date 2- /2 - 11
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51 - 63

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1198)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asbeville, NC 28801
(vg) 251.6208
Fax (eig) 251-6452
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Burka
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cbervkee
Polk
Clay
Ruaberford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax (910) 48"707
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
Hun=
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisors
585 Waughtown Street
Winstoo-Salem. NC 27107
(33b� 771.4600
Fax OIL) 771-4631
Alamanae Rockingham
Alleghaay Randolph
Asbe
Stokes
Casweu
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Farsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27989
(2Sx) 946" 1
Fax (9!;Ji 975-3716
Beaufort Jones
Beatie Lenoir
Cbowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck.
Pprquimaas
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
0110=
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Saw
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander
Lincoln
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Catawba
Rowan
Cleveland
Stanly
Gaston
iredell
Union
Raleigh Regional WQ SWervism
38M Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatbam
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecembe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vanoe
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Ww=
Lee
Wikoa
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 29405-3945
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Caru:m Onslow
Columbus Pander
Duplin
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/2&98 Page 4 of 4

' State,of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David . Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Farm Number: 51 - 63
Dear David G. Herring:
1 lkf?W,A •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRCEs
You are hereby notified that David G. Herring Swine Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.10C, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of
this letter, your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting
documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996),
Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by
the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your
application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
Sincere
Kerr T. Stevens
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division, of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
David G. Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Dear David Herring:
M IT __V_T
i • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 23, 2000 r��
MAR :. 7 2000
rr�_
_J
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510063
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your application received on July 19, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to David G. Herring, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the David G. Herring Swine Farm, located in Johnston County,
with an animal capacity of,no_greater than 625 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified
in the Certified Animal Wastc Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510063
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincer
y
.J Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

r
41
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
David G. Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Dear David G. Herring:
4 • •
AM
NCDEN,R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 � ,) f ` -- . ' _ I ���
2�ttlll RALEIGH RLGJCA'AL OFFICE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 5�1��
Johnston -County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
r vi
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I }
R 7 2000
Producer: DAVID HERRING E D
� -- -- - ' � E'C1AE1-N S�,C�ION
Location: P.O.HOX 224
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366 , 16
Telephone: [phone]
NOA-fl1SCilaf9e
Type Operation: Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
625.00 sows
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste i,X to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Sgil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining. -
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
625 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 4562.5 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
625 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 4062.5 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE I! ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS—
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
10667
1H1
WaB
BP
4.7
235
0
2.02
474.7
APR-SEP
r24_1 r
10667
-1H1
SG
1 0
1101
I
150
12-02
JSEP.APR.
10667
1H2
BP
4.7 a
jWaB
OOk-
w/'
I
1235
14.34 11019.9
APR-SEP
10667
V1H2
SG
1 0
217
Or
I
150
14.34
SEP.APR.
Pu//
END
I
TOTAL11812.6
— Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
10668
1H3
WaB
BP
4.7
235
0
3.58
841.3
APR-SEP
10668 1-1H3 I _ Il G 150 `0 13.58 "179
SEP.APR.
10668 1H4 JWa5 BP 4.7 1235 0 14.34 11019.9
APR-SEP
10668 -1H4 I SG 1 150 0 4.34 1217
ISEP.APR.
TOTAL12257.2
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity,.especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three 'times during the season, depending on
time ' small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BP
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
6.36
1812.6
7.92
2257.2
14.28
4069.8
* BALANCE
-7.3
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
_ _ Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd -areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 687.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3437.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 11.4583333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 27.5 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I
I
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract (
I
Field l
I
Soil Type
I Crop
I
I (in/hr)
I
I (inches)
f
10667 11H1
l
WaB
l BP
I .50
I *.50
10667 11H2
l
WaB
l BP
I .50
I *.50
I
1
I
I
10667 I
--1H1 j
I SG
I .50
I *.50
10667 l
-1H2 I
l SG
I .50
l *.50
1
10668 11H3
I
I
WaB
I
' BP
I
.50
I
*.50
I
10668 11H4
I
I
WaB
I
l BP
I
I .50
I
l *.50
I
10668 I
I
-1H3
I
SG
I
I .50
I
I *.50
10668 I
I
-1H4 I
I
I SG
(
.50
I
I *.50
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the.
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
&O l c ev ev r/1VA e" /VIVO
�o3!'�?/ 55/a� / a S If
e `r a `
�wS
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIREDSPECIFICATIOM
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2: There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when,
there is a change in the operation, increase in the -number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 14 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other.
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to.perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist"'. Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED_ SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility.of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page; 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
VAST& UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:.D.G.HERRING SWINE FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted .to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I.(we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: DAVID HERRING
(Please print)
Signature: u ,�-r..-•�
Date:
Name of Manage (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of
Date:
Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chri
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27 7
Signature: r Date:
Smith
Nde i5 u1<<s orI/ le vi 51d,J 4 / �
Sd� CC // ea 4 ri,-) le) D
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional .land has to be leased, etc.)
I, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System.
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Term of Agreement:
Date:
Date:
, 19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party -Receiver Agreement
I; hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver: Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary• ,
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

1
Tom cRoCKETT IANIQAMN; INN..
761 b. MAIN ST. + P. O. box 390
WILLIAMstoN, NC 27892
[phone]
r'
D G HERRING
P 0 Box 224
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366
PhILA: UUU IH1 IU14
326982
PLEASE INDICATE THIS
NUMBER WHEN ORDERING
3/26/98
PROPOSED SHIPPING DATE
TERMS F.O.S.
kET 30 SHIPPING POINT
SALESPERSON
L [phone] -� USDA-NRCS AGENT: JOY SHERROD
TO BE SHIPPED VIA Pvo, on tort
Here is otit qualallon on the goodt hBtnAd, oublecl to the condttlons holed:
CONDITIONS: The prices and terms on this quotation are not subject to verbal changes or other agreements unless approved in writing by the Nome Office of the Seiler. Aft quolalions
and agreements are contingent upon sfrihes, accldenfs, fires, 6vairabilily of materials end ail other causes beyond our control. Prices are based on costs and conditions existing on date
of quofation and are subject to change by the Seiler before Anal acceptancA.
Typographkal and stenographic errors subject to correction. Purchaser agrees to accept either overage or shortage not In excess of fen percent to be chargl3d for pro•rafa.
Purchaser assumes Nabirify for patent and copyright infringement when goods are made to Purchaser's speciffcafions. When quotation specifies malarial to be furnished by the purchaser,
ample allowance must be made for reasonable spoilage and riraferlaf must be of suitable quality to facilitate efliclent production.
Conditions nol speciikagystated harvinshall be governed by established trade customs. Terns inconsistent with those slated herein whkh may appear on Purciaser's format
order wig nor be binding on the Seller. 1.
'1'EZOPUANTIT'Y
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
AMOUNT
1 2100'
4" PR-160 PVC pipe
.72
$ 1,512.00
2 1
4" PVC tee
17.21
3 2
4" PVC 450 elbows
15.12
30.24
4 1
4 x 4 x 4 x 42" hydrant
249.68
5 2
4 x 4 x 4 x 42" hydrants w/2" MPT
283.74
567.48
6 1
4" flanged zee
313.06
7 1
4" check valve
275.54
8 2
4" PVC 90° elbows
11.60
23.20
9 2
4" PVC caps
7.25
14.50
L0 1
4" valve elbow, Ring Lock
96.00
Ll 1
3" tri-action valve
165.00
L2 2
AV-200 air vents
33.85
67.70
L3 1
4" x 20' discharge hose
224.70
.4 1
B2EQHH w/4 CYL JOHN DEERE pumping unit
9,250.00
L5 1
P1025 HOBBS traveler, 850' X 2'2" hose
11,453.65
L6 1
4" X 35' suction hose
----2-9-5.10
2' 4,555.06
Installation of PVC pipe less concrete
2,200.00
T26,755.06
-k*PVC PIPE PRICES MAY BE HIGHER OR LOWER AT TIME ORDERS**
OUOTL VAL10 Kos BAYS.
By I
Ae

e
TOM CROCKETT IRRIGATION, INC. • P.O.BOX 390 • WILLIAM5TON, NORTH CAROLINA 27892 • 919-792-3121
D G HERRING
P 0 BOX 224
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366
[phone]
SPRINKLER SR-100 GUN, .7 T NOZZLE; 120 GPM, 70 PSI, 275' DIAMETER
SPACING 73% X 275 = 200' LANE SPACING
APPLICATION 96.3 X 120 11556 _ 360
RATE 3.14 .9x137.52) 48086.15 .24 X 340 -
TDH 1900' PR-160 4" PVC PIPE @ 120 GPM, .3 PER 100'
5' SUCTION LIFT
10' ELEVATION INCLUDING RISER HEIGHT
4" CHECK VALVE @ 120 GPM
850'x2%2" TRAVELER HOSE @ 120 GPM, 4.1 PER 100'
SPRINKLER PSI
PUMP B2EQHH, 120 GPM, 120 PSI, 55% EFFICIENCY
,or' I�cw�.r r?7��'JS 15 O
HORSEPOWER — 39 X 120 -�fr.-8 } 8.?Z HP
3960 X .55
PIPE AND PVC IS SDR-26, PR-160.
FITTINGS COATED STEEL.
1,c'D5 IRa,�
TRAVEL SPEED X 120 1 P_
.5 X 200 100
(,ip;l,c)rooup+ = C,'S';rche"5
.25
5.7
2.16
4.33
.01
70.0
117.91P OR
229.39 FT HD
-1.�, 2r
FITTINGS ARE SCH 40 AND EPDXY-
-(3 '
PER MINUTE
lb
VERN PARKER 3/26/98

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landov►medOperator Game: D G HERRING
Address: P 0 BOX 224
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366
Telephone:[phone]
TABLE i - Field Specifications'
County; Z hr e-,+orn
date:
Fietd
Number2
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(7.)
crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate +
(irVhr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cyctel
(inches)
Comments
�l
LJarlrrnm
t7—:z,
�t� :-r l Q-.}erg - i; ;r
C.
S..
'Table to be completed in its entirety by Feld Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
2See attached map provided by the Feld Office for field location(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Feld Office Technical Guide, Section Il G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used_
Irrigation Parameters
October 1996
page-1
USDA -MRCS
North Carolina

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings D G HERRING
Make, Model and Type of Equipment HOBBS P1025 , 850' x2 Z" HOSE; SIR-100 GUN, .7 NOZZLE; 120 GPM, 70 PSI, 275' DIA
Field No'
and
Hydrant Nee
Travel
Speed
(furnin)
Application
Rate
finlht)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Efleetive
Width tfll Length (ftl
Welled Noufe
Diameter Diameter
(feet) {inches)
EOIAPMENT SETTINGS
Operating Operating
Pressure Pressure
Gun (psi) @ Reel (psi)
Are
Patterns
Comments
I L-2&
I o4l_ a51 210' 1
420
I - 1 .7 1
70 1 1019.I
340'.
ArRFS
21 f
I
I2Kx51
goo
I
4.34
31
I
{ 200 I
780
I
3.58
41
I
I 210 1
900
I �� 1 �. I
" I '�
I .. I
4.34
I I I 1 I I I I { I 14.28 ACRES
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I i I i I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 I I I {
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I ! I
I I I I I I I I i
I I I I I I I
I I I I I ! I I !
I I I I I I I I !
'See attached reap provided by the Field Office for field iocatian(s)_
7Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TO (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle). T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in decrees.
Irrigation Parameters USDA.NRCS
October 1995 page-2 North Carolina

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
D J HERRING
Traveling
Irrigation Oun
Solid Set
"gallon
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpml
120
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
112)
Design Precipitation Rate (lnlhr)
5210, aS
Hose Length (feet)
00
xxxxxxxx
Type of Speed Compensation
MECHANICAL
xxxxxxxx
Pump Type (PTO, Entine, Electric)
MGT ME
Purrm Power Requirement (hp)
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications'
❑esioner may provide thrust block details on senarate sheet_
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
ARIEA (sq. ft.)
90' Bend 4"
2.5
Dead End "1.75
[) _
Tee 419
1.75 —`
o bpnd 4"
1.2
1See USDA -MRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 470-DD.
USE 1200 FOR SOIL -BEARING STRENGTH
(/ ?30
k Imo .) l],�)OL?
4 IVO :Z
x 1.=;k0? lam
laC) % t aon
r,-)0,1 i Oa
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1995 paged North Carolina

Name:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
PRES TON L . PARKER, JR .
TOM CROCKETT IRRIGATION INC
P 0 BOX 390/751 E MAIN ST(WILLIAMSTON NC 27892
919-792-3121 — -
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
b.
7.
A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
Nfanufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinlcler(s).
Nfanufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA -MRCS standard for Irrigation 'Dater Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the
designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval
of the designer.
ti 0TE: A buffer strip 50 feet wide or wider must be 'Maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DEHNFR-DENT Code Section ISA NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.
Irrigation Parameters USOA NRCS
october 1995 pages North Carolina

TRAVELER SYSTEM .
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designerisupplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
Irrigation Parameters USCA44RCS
October 1995 page-" North Carolina

BIG GUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJEFORY""
100 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES .Ill
P.&I.
Nozzle
S
GPM VIA,
Nozzle
'b5'
GPM VIA.
NvzzIs
oz
GPM VIA.
Nozzle
.65'
GPM VIA.
Nozzle
.T
GAM CIA.
Nozzle
.75'
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
b'
GPM ,CF/1.
Nozzle
b5'
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
A'
GPM VIA.
Nozzle
1.0"
GPM DIA.
50
50
205'
84 215' 1
74
225'
1 07
235'
1 100
245'
1 115
256'
1 130
255'
1 150
273'
1 105
280'
204
300'
70
80
225'.
75 238'
1 88 ,
250' 11 103
263:
1 120
275'
136
263'
1 •155
295'
1 177
302'
1 197
310'
PNTVNMMIVIT
243
338'
90
68
245'
03 2581
too
270'
111
283'
1 135
295'
1 155
300'
1 17S
315'
1 201
326'
223
335'
274
362'
110
76
. 265'
92 27B' I
111
290'
129
303
160
315'
1 17f
324'
1 165
33S'
1 222
344'
247
355'
304
300'
'AVaftble only with F100 a BRI00.
100 R RING NOZZLES 100 DN DIFFUSER NOZZLES
PSI 71 RING .77 RING 1 .01 RING AS RING 1 .89 RING 1 .93 RING 1 .90 RING 11 0.5 ON 1 0.8 ON 0.7 ON 0.8 DN
GPM VIA GPM CIA GPM QIA GPM VIA GPM CIA GPM OIA GPM CIA GPM CIA GPM CIA I GPM CIA I GPM DIA
w i v n d r• ¢ro
ill,94.255 1 111 205 121 278 1 145 265 1 163 189 305 ill 315
100 1 .105 270 1 124 200 1 142- 29S 1 162 30S 1 192 320 1 212 325 1 2M 33S
—The diameter of throw Is apprealmately, 34bNea for the 21• trajectory angle, 6% less for Ir.
150 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
PS.I.
Nozzle
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
GPM CIA,
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.2"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.3'
GPM CIA.
e0
116
265'
143
205'
102
305'
225
325'
275
'15'
330
365'
395
380,
80
128
290'
105
310'
210
335'
266
355'
315
373'
an
395'
445
410,
100
143
310'
185
330'
235
355'
290
375' 1
355
400' 1
425
420'
500
440*
120
157
330'
204
36Q' 1
258
375'
320
395'
38S
420'
485
440'
S15
460.
150 R RING NOZZLES t
Rim
b8
GPM
VIA,
Rlr�
.97
GPM
VIA.
Rini
100
GPM
CIA.
Rln�
1.18
GPM
DIA.
Ring
t.28"
GPM
CIA.
Ring
1.34"
GPM
CIA.
Ring
1 41^
GPM
VIA.
000
110
280'
•143
280,
t82
300'
225
315,
275
335'
330
350'
us
365'
128
280'
185
300'
2tO
320'
260
340'
315
380'
380
380'
445
395'
143
300'
185
320'
235
340,
290
360'
355
380,
425
400,
500
415'
120
157
315'
204
335'
258
360'
320
390'
365
100'
465
420'
545
435'
"The dlamela of throw is epproArnalely 3% less la the 21 • ttajec orir angle.
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 270 TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Nozzle
1.05"
GPM DIA.
Nouk
ozz
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.2'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.3'
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
I k"
GPM pIA.
Nozzle
15'
GPM CIA,
Nozzle
18'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.75"
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
19"
GPM DIA.
70
270 350'
310
300'
355 395'
415
410'
400
430'
555 450'
630
465'
755 495'
090
515'
94
310 390'
350
410'
405 425'
475
445'
545
465'
625 485'
711
SOS'
855 535'
1005
555'
Ila
340 410'
390
430'
445 450'
525
470'
605
495'
695 515'
790
535'
945 565'
Ilia 5901
130
370 425'
425
415'
485 465'
565
485'
655
51W
755 aes540'
060
560'
1025 590'
f210
520
200 R RING NOZZLES'
P51.
(i 'k" Rlno 11
GPM+ acC1A.
1 j{" Ri1.46ng
t�pM" aetOF�.
1 rh" Ring FF
G SjdB" ac1DIA.
{{ 1 %' Ring }}
liPtu{" VIA.
1 Wa" Ri1.74ng))
C3PM" ectuValA.
f rA' Ring
GPM" aef011
2" Ring
1 M^ acluDaljA
60
25o 340'
330 370'
385 390'
1 445 410'
515 425'
565 440,
695 455'
80
290 370'
380 400'
1 445 420'
1 SI5 440,
590 455'
875 470'
805 490,
too
325 390'
425 425'
500 445'
1 575 465'
660 480'
755 500•
900
124
355 410'
465 445'
1 545 465'
1 630 405'
1 725 500'
1 025 520'
1 985 545'
—The diameter of throw h approximately 2% less for the 24' trajectory angle.. 5% less for the 27 • Irelenory *note.
The BIG GUN' performance data has been obtained under Ideal test conditions and may be adversely alfecled by wind, poor hydraulic entrance conditions or other tactois,
Nelson Irrigation Corporation makes no representation regarding droplet condition, unilormity. or application rate.

Ax` .;tthkrL€V. 0UM0§
.,,
p�i�t�'IAIATING .CUr�VE T�.
A .
cuhvt 4117
nA,rE 1.27-89
Mat 0.51
' SUPERSEDES
Cdrve 4117 Page 0.51
Dated 9-1-88
�.::l .. L CM �j i :.RLk-L=idlt .. KA2i 'Laois' . 1�ARIbU9 UAL
4;wf a:t.xl tJ1`kk1i: H-1802 (►kf►U k4401 6W. 94r fdli t.o.i.li«rr:.Aiir,i!
..,... --,r +&r 0
IS
200
i3
100
1
I
i t o
, . �00
•' _:!', Wkrlr !N U.l, 8ALL6fi! f5E11 iUiIUT't
C-8610 i:::e:�„=1#55;.':,;• ilo«.:::: -g5�6 b.i:i L-114d .. 9=1846 MODUS2ZOM
t �::s� i1:4wW c ,'Flllili L��Uei %6kwL L-i48s .. IMAidd1.i.N.:` er"
ll�im, Lam"tiiii'iilEpR #!-�o�$ 11:d.11; k-6�is 64 id-ilis" full
400
60
too
50
d
IN
cis
"Millis
am
SUMPT
Emil
Hill
girl,
m"
Im
11
IN
11MIN
III
Im
No
ME
m
NOE
E
C
-
01111HIM1101,92
Empummm9mmmmmom
ON
NP
• • 1
�
�. 4r�i1$11R
#I�T�__�
���A
`�./.�I�1d1.w�
_�f��M
�J�y��
Nil
11111flig"111
MINIM
C
a
I11111111111111111111
mg
I 11011101-9
all
110
amimmommm
-
G
H
VHH
mm2m1
■
■■
did
I0
�s��llFe��l2em:!_
Imammummmommim
T I TA
q�
E
10
205,
111
m
M
0
m
D
WA,
��4IA
'IUA�,/II
►r
:
p
FRSM'oIr1P1B
T'�EWEN■ll�
NOW
30
20
20
10
0
TDIL
0 loot ;.200 300 400 500
bA61cft fN U.1. dAL1dkJ KA Y1WM
C-$579 i::.e:7,•.,t-���� ,. i.o:�.da C-831i o:f:a 1-91=�� bW 11446 M0DEL82t0HH

^ ... i... i Sj'�l't ...s'�`r La 5w }..:..wstis�.• r. ....,.. .. -7^. ; w:. fit. .,. ..... ... ? Y `�+.€ s; `S e•j �.y£ �`kYirs (.
Traveler IrrigationReel Rain
�� I,. a`+ ":� .{�� 4+� al. • <h � � $ i". a� _ '��' 13;� X��"�y it
wrA
f Jy I -q
t
•'V i ,. i l .{(a{ `Ir 5 6� „ Y 41 s.f
Ak�Y pn �"y, $its4 r;.4S p�eA`�'� 4's•...!,h t s 1rR..rri ��t"+{�yss+,_¢E q' iA",
fi o•• -'i 'Ty j�N �y '�� +j
t ?.� �. , ra.� ��• �w r �,„ y Fl �'�e r :dam¢^• {{ea•, r> �
ana y'r
Ile
IPA
..
r� ks
VV
w

Irinbvative New be§iglit. Concept Proiricle§ Greater Operator Control
Simpler Opetationl ' Low Maintenance!- Accurate Application!
6 Technologically advanced design Improves operational performance.
# New frame design provides lower center of gravity for added stability.
s Double guncart lift arms holds guncart in place during transport.
• Innovative new cam design for speed compensation ensures accuracy.
"User -Friendly" Control Station makes Reel
Raln Operation Simple and Easy!
. JF'l
F
3 �' iced gearbox' `>t"
p
pxorid Gast�gine
yiesoti 5R{'h00 Gun !
:.,
Automatic 6r�king System
1i,Atitomatic -lose Retrieval Stop'.
Rugged lrrame besign
i; pT0 Re�vit�t� :k .
i Safety Shi' Ing
f i Turntable
i GalvanlZed Guncart
dalvaniied Fittings,
6'MeCh6nical Hose Guide {,..'.
1.1�1suliid Sensor
4 Bullt=in Storage Tray
�r>
Large "spider' design turntable is maintenance
free, no bearings to grease!...and provides for
effortless positioning of the reel. Multi -position
upper frame pin locking mechanism allows for
easy adjustments.
Convenient built-in storage tray
holds infeed hose, tools, and other
items.
(Va bF llcre3 low Rate :
� Gne Pull, Applying 1 `_
Model
Hose Lengll�
Dose I
L6hig tl l£
ktl�
Co�eFe l iri ' GPM
of Wafer hrs Nelson Gun
Number
(feelj
°�Ine hes}
ai�eet `
rjne f'u!I } `£ `Gas
Gas' and Pressure
1025
650..:.::..0
:...._
�.:,<:;.v ....
10.y....., ...... SRi,00/80 PSl
1100 Holland Pd . Po. Box 1833 . Suffolk, VA 23439.1833 l� .`� 1701 South Slappey Blvd. • PO. Box 3681 • Albany, GA 31706
Phone (%5:j 539.0231 - Fox 1757) 934-3264 i�J Phone [phone] • Fox [phone]
AMADAS iNOLMMIFS' policy Is we of cnnlllnlous inlpinvement, and we .delve the 0961 to change spielkallons. design nr rw1cm wUhnut incurring nNigwllon,

4
EDE" S P E C I F I C A T 1 0 N S
Min
PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS
Net Rated Power—lip(k1Xl) .....................................................—.37.7 (28.1)
RatedSpeed—rim...................................................................
......On
Net Peak Torque-114t (Nn1)...................................................70.3
(103A)
Peak 'Torque Speed —rpm .............................................
...........:........... 22(K)
LowIdle Speed—rpm...........................................................................1;
(X)
1)MEP—psi(kPa).............................................................................93.0
(611)
Altitude Capability (w/o DefuelinR)`ft
(m)............................4921
(15M)
Air.Fuel Ratio..........................................................................................22:1
Smoke @ Rated Speed—Boscll No.........................................................3.0
Nolse—dl1(A) 0 1 nt.............................................................................
W.0
Enilnt NET Power
NET Torque
NET 0SFC
rpm hp (kW)
llrTT (Nm)
lb/hp-hr (E/kWhi
30n) 37.7(2R.1)
616.0OVA)
0.3R6(235)
2RX) 37.5 (2R 0)
70A MA)
0.376(229)
200 30.3 (27.1)
73.4 (9<).5)
0-P) (221)
241) 34.5 (25.7)
75.5 (1024)
0.365 (222)
231) 31.8(23.7)
76-30n3:0
0.363(221)
21XX) 29.0(2L0)
70,3003.4)
0.305(222)
IFXX) 25.9093)
7515(102.4)
0i70(225)
101) 22.7069)
74.8(101.4)
0,375(2211)
PERFORMANCE CURVE
NET Torque
:... _
�..-
...
- .
7(i
0031 z
Ts.3
bit
e
(I03.4
t4
4
77 i
h
-
19 z
1971 =
'
189.4 Nm1
.
36
1211�3i.anp.w
£
CpntinuOW
NET
Power
128.1
kW) .
32
1741
29
fNl
_
21
.
044 a
_ —•_ . - w
OAo 4t
ruef Consumption
I
12441 m
LL
16M 180o 2000 2200 7400 2000 2800 3000
Er,K ! SprW0
ENGINIS PICIURED HAVE BrEN PAIN•I7i1) FOR DISPLAY PURPUS[_'R.

Y 1
y A N 23.6 H,
49oomm)
vvM
n r tit
01
Modd. �:..._:.i..........:::.�....».:ai:.............._............ .............. 4019D
Whb
No dhd Shuk duh)...........�u s ..... �..�................�31 it 3.39 (84 x
bisphtYttltiil�lii[1J.:...................:is:........... .............. 1IG(Lm
Gorttpl�idt #acid ....................
......
.........
.......
.........
...........
..........
..............................1� i
dd
Valves 1ieF �L�lafetl xliiiisi........» w.......................................................IA
N.
wnhww................................... _................................ l 3 cUo
hngint Type » » _ .._ ...._ » .a: ::.._................................lndlrse�
E,t� nkcase Vent System.. »:.�................................................ opdi ........................ .
Mauiniinn Crrrdn & Presst e—W. Rd (kPa)...................................................2 (0.5)
%11i WAL Af;lE WWATiONA
0ndudes Engine. Flywheel Housing. Flywheel siid 1�caricy)
Lc.(mrn)................................................................................................32.4 Mz
tlelghf-w. m}ri).............. .......................................... »........................................ 32.4(WO
Vveight. dry'-b. 1k�......................................:............................................I......506aM
CcitteitiTCrivlty � .
IF kct CJJ)t bf fllor k (9c ls} -1ti• (mm)»............................._.......�f (1(5)
t1,20 S)
Z7�1iikShi$ {r d:ii4} aN (titHtl ......A •: .... ...........................
�liidiYitiiit Atki+d4shle 5tatlr hlattteht At... �
Rcif hire bf "hedl HoUft */ S l3 laa"iR (Nm) ....................159 (216)
bifibi nd1Insbiwa�r�y�t,11 Wd t,utill ................................ .0..::................................�9(2�n
AY§itM SOMMdAtION$.. .
> WRW
1lscvirtttieiidcd 6atfetq Capat3ty (�
• 62 Volt 5ystctll- W ji ................»................................................... a
Mn6ttlm Allotvabic ,% ttng Ch -ull Rd isb trt
12 Volt Systeiti—bhrti............. :.................................... ................................... oabd
Sbdd Ro ft ctnretit it 32 deg k (0 deg C}
12 Volt Systettt-imp....................................... :.......... :........ ............................... 350
Alta 406m
Maximum Allo*able'%mp ltlseAmblent Air to
Fngint Wet—dcg P (dcg C)..........................................................................18 (i0?
Rut"" Atr kd2kk Nesttictkltl
Dirty Air tk !md-M. 00(kh)....... »......................................................25 (6.25)
Clean Air C1eifstf— ti.1120(kN)...................................................................12 (3)
bngint Air Flo*-h-'/ndn(ms/r01n).................................................................83.7
(2.37)
Intake Maiiliold f'tt snit-1i1. F#gdd-1).............................................................AMNM
Recomindwed Eirlrait5f hlpt biitn"ad-4n,(rrirtt) ...............................
I:xw(w No*-omiti(tiitm*o....................... ::........ »...............................
....n0(7.G5)
L-dulat Tempemhft-deb. h (deg. 0.............................................................932 0M
Mlxlmwn Mlo*able Sack Pressi�. fig 61-0........................................3.7G (12.3)
Rccvmmendcd Exhuat Pipe DUrnelci-In. (mm)..........................................2.36
(G0)
toling &YAWN
Engine heat Rejediori-M/min(M).........................................................io93(19.2)
t:.00laril F1ow-gal/m1n (LAnin).........................................................I................18.2
(7m
T6eHosUt Start to Open -deg. F (dcg: C) ........................................................IG0(71)
lhetmostat Fully Open-cleg. F (deg.Q............................................................185
(85)
MaxhnWt Waict Pump Wet Rtglricd&o -tn. fig (M).....................................
3 (l0)
hngine Coolant Capactty-tlt.(L).........................................................................4.9(4,7)
Recodunefided Pressiirt Cap-psi(kN)............................................................12.8
(88)
My tiitim Top Wank PresAft-deg. F (deg. G) .................................................210
M
lteromtnetided Aft to Boil- ft F (deg. G).......................................................117
(47)
Ada! $ywim
K" 1n)edioit Pttlnp................................................................................................yxmw
C�t,l:3��ei"Itegtllatbtt....................................... ..................................................... RX mix.
t, dk-1ii�,�yTYi* ................ ................................................................... I .............
Mechutkal
Fuel Coristtmptton-Ib/hrftft)......................................................................t4.7(G.7)
Maidniiuri Allowable Fuel Pump Sucdon
Clean System-bi. Hg (kPQ........................................................................2.3
(7.9)
Fuel Filth Miciioii Sink 0 99% F119elcricy.................................
Lubtitt=9w Ay8latil
00 Prmsute al Wed 5pted-W(kill) ............................................................49.7(343)
001'resAii a If L6* Idle-psi(Oa) .....................................................................21(147)
hi Put 00 Temperatwt•-deg. F (deg C) .........................................................240
(115)
00 Nh Capacity, [DO-ql. W............................................................................G.5
63)
oil Pari Capaclty, Low-qt.(L).............. ..................................... :.........................
4.1(3.9)
Total Engine Oil Capacity with Hie". (L)...................................................7.1(G.M
tnginc Angular Limits (Continuoes)
Anyctirecoon-degma..........................................................................................25
All babied of i-iited speed And power with standard option unimi otherwise nutnL
5peciacsilom kid design subject to change without nodce.
DIEN
Will POYVEII $YStWI
P.O. Hoc S I00
JOHlM DURE
INTERCONTINENTAL, OmbH
' rrrrri�
11Vaterloa,1A 50704
Phone [phone]OW
400 19di Street
Mollne, Illinois 61265-1388
PAX (319) 29M075
phone [phone]
DKE5692 Litho In U.S.A. (92-t 1 )
FAx (3M 765.3197

General Installation
Recommendations. -
FOR GASKET PIPE
Installation
Excavation, Laying, Testing, and Back -
filling Instructions ere Usually provided
by the Engineerinbharge of the project.
Reference may also be made to Amerl-
can Society for Testing and Materials
Standard, ASTM D-2774 "Recommended
Practice for Underground Installation of
Thermoplastic Pressure Piping."
Excavation
I. The trench bottom shall be stable,
continuous, relatively smooth, and free
of rocks or other objects detrimental to
the pipe. It shall provide continuous
support for the pipe, and bell holes shall
be provided for the bell and spigot joints,
valves, and other system components
that might act tie a fulcrum. When made
through a rock cut, at least 4" of com-
pacted satisfactory bedding material
shall be provided.
2. The trench depth shall place the pipe-
line at least 6"below the lowest recorded
frost depth, and shall place the pipeline
depth at least 30" below grade.
3. The trench Width at the top of the pipe
shall be as narrow as practical 10 allow
adequate room for joining the pipe and
to allow proper compaction of the sidefill.
Minimum trench width Is normally con-
sidered 12" plus the pipe O.D.
4. Pipelines shall be cased, bridged, or
otherwise protected at locations where
they will be subject to heavy surface
loads due to shallow burial. Casing shall
also be used In spanning creeks and
gullies, extending 8 IL on either side of
the creek or gully.
Jointing
1. The pipe shall be Jointed In the trench,
or above ground, In accordance with the
Jointing instructions.
2. It Is Important that the gasket be clean
and properly seated, the spigot end well
lubricated, and the bell and spigot ends
aligned correctly In both planes.
3. If Jointing Is done above ground, care
Should be taken when lowering pipe into
the trench that the depth of the Joint entry
•emains correct. Check that the depth
)f entry mark on the spigot ends Isfiush
Nith the face of the bell. Jointing of 6"
and large pipe is usually done In 114e trench.
I. AT NO TIME should a back -hoe or
iimilar device be used to assemble pipe.
Thrust Blocking
As with other push -fit robber gasketed
Joints, the pipe will not take end thrust
without restraints. Thrust blocks are
usually required at dead ends and
wherever the tine changes direction of
30 degrees or more.
1. Thrust blocks shall be placed so that
the bearing surface Is in direct line with
the major force created by the pipe or
fitting. Concrete having a compressive
strength of 2000 psi Is the recommended
blocking material, and may be poured
between the simplest of forms and the
undisturbed earth bearing surfaces.
2. Thrust blocking size may be calculated
as follows:
8) Multlplythe pressure level desired
for testing by the value shown in the
table for thrust on fittings:
Thrust in Pounds
Pipe
Size
90
Elbow
45
Elbow
22%
Bend
bead End
or Tee
8"
48.74
20.38
13.45
39.10
8"
82.61
44.72
22.80
61.18
10"
8.04
Rlso.54
89.47
38.42
95.05
12"
77.23
49.82
133.70
b) Determine the bearing strength of
the sail from the following table:
HEARING STRENGTH OF SOILS
SOIL
lb. per Sq Ft.
Muck Peet, etc.
0
Solt clay
-
1,000
Sand -
2,000
Sand and gravel
3,000
Send and gravel cemented with clay 4,000
Hard shale
101000
c) Divide the total thrust on the fitting
(step a) by the bearing strength of
the soil (step b). The result Is the
square feet of area needed on the
face of the thrust block.
d) Thrust blocks should haunch the
pipe or fitting, not encase It.
Backfilling
1. Place select backfill and compact
under the haunch, along the sides of,
and over the top of the pipe to a com-
pacted depth of a1 least a". Thisbackfill
shall be sons that allow good compaction
and placed In 6" layers, well compacted.
It shall be free of rocks, frozen clods, or
other hard objects.
2. The final backf III may then be made In
the usual manner, but care should be
taken not to dump large rocks or heavy
objects on the initial backtlll and pipeline.
3. if the Joints and fittings must be left
exposed while under test, backfill to
within one foot of each side of the Joint
or fitting to prevent deflection of the
Pipe whlle under test pressures.
Testing
I. ALLAIR INTHE PIPELINESHALL BE
BLED OFF CAREFULLY WHILE FILLING
THE LINE WITH WATER FOR TESTING.
Entrapped air In the line can cause ex-
cesalve lest pressures, and create un-
necessary problems. Air shall be bled
off at the high spots in the line. AV
removal may also be accomplished by
pushing a foam plug through the line by
incoming water pressure.
2. Test pressures may be 11h times the
designed operating pressure of the
pipeline, but shall not exceed the maxi-
mum pressure rating of the pipe.
3. After pressure test and acceptance
of testing, the uncovered joints and fit-
tings shall be Initially backfilled with
well compacted soil, and then covered
with final backflll.
4. Hydraulic pressure testing of the
pipeline shall be carried out initially at
Intervals not exceeding 500 yards and
thereafter at Intervals not exceeding
1.000 yards.
Radius Bends
Gradual change of direction may be
achieved by deflecting or cocking RiEBER
Joints a maximum of 3 degrees without
affecting the hydraulic seal of the Joint.
Offsets are made only after the straight
in -line assembly is made. Deflections at
the Joint and minimum curve radii (ft.)
obtainable are listed below.
Degree of
Deflection
at the Joint
-jggatha
Offset, Inches Radius, feet
1
4.2"
1.151Y
2
8.311
572'
3
12.3"
381-
-4-

W,
V ,;
on each side of the pipe tp provide support free from voids. final backftll only of{er'Fhe miriimui4'4epth pf cover has been
Care should be taken to avoid deforming, displacing, pr placed end only yv)ilt piRF hpll'B 14'� ttilsk4Pses t the
I' P
damaging the pipe during this phase of the operation. , the pf -q}
i � � . ,...... ' •:;Ire,•;- . .
6.4 Final backfill 1 :.> . • 'T" �• r ;• .' . ;;,.ti
6AA General. After pipeflgr 44stiiig, final backftll shall be ECPON7-§UCW,E9NSJM!!WKai;('I.3,;
placed and spread in appros:6Rjely unlfgrM.layers in such } 7.1 sell Jtples foF Fubl1}F ; 4F �tlPtf tWhet}`FhR' loll b44►g-in=
manner'as to fill the trench completely so that there will be no stalled J; provided with rubpet.gaskel jo4gs,. bfp doles }half be
unfilled spaces under or }bout rock; or JugipF of earth in the : excavated in the bedding p4terial to allow for the •pngbstrltcted
backfill. Final backfill shalt be frFe of large rocks, frozen clods 44sembly of the joint, Care should be taken that:the b44 hole 4 qo,;}"
and other debris greater than 76 mm (31n.) in diameter. Rolling larger than necessary to accomplish-prgper joint 9ssembiV, µ beq the"
equipment or heavy tampers should be used to consolidate the joint has beetl made, the bell hole she id be care fully filled w}t4
TAPIA 44 TURUPT BLOCKING AND AWPHORS FAR U1•IAFRGRO1 ' 0 0: "+ra
ftep A. Mrdtlply the yrorkin; presmtga pr the }pproptiate`rYaluel
f.Xa►« V showp In the followlrig {ahie {o abtelq `a{r! tj�rust to N" ()b):
it; r,.. .... •• �..a. ,,, 1PELINE TiiRus c G f ,
� �'a:0 14pe Size dead End @0° , 8° 22-112°
=t f.
�� 7►�v �i. in. tnm or Tea Elbogi Eltioq ' Elbow
• •e
1-1f2
88.1
2.94
4.16
2.26
1.15
2
60.8
4.56
6.45
3.60.
1.78
2.112
63.5
6.55
9.0
4.10
2.60
3
76.2
9.80
13.9
7.51
3.82
3-1 12
88.9
12.8
18.1 ' "'
9.81 "
4.99
4
101.6
16.2.
23.0.
12.4 -
6.31
5
227.0
24.7.,
85.0 ' . ,
48.9
; 9.63
6
152.4.,
84.8
49.2 ,
26.7
13.0
8
203.2
59.'0
"' ' 83 6 :
46.2
23.0
10 • ''
254.0
91.5
180.0 "'
70.Q "
35.8
12 "'
304.8
128.0
- •,-182.0
98.5
60.3 '
• Based on thrust per kPa (pd) pressure •,, ,.. t „ .• , . •
• ,
t B)ocidng for cross may not be needed with ion; branch lines..
Stop 2. Determine the kearlpf f{req;0 9f the }gll SF41q Flip l9blo
below'
SI+ARING STRE1fGT1t ACE 4011.$ . ,, :., k,: , ,,-R:-r . is .l 1
Solle and Safe Bearing Loads
8aund Shale
7s.8
Demented Gravel and Send ,,,,,,..,r:.
-.l.r
difficult to pick 4 OQO
194.5
Coarse qnd Line aompact Sand .' " ' i 4000 !'
443.6
Medium Clay -Can be spaded 2000 *'
95.8
Soft Clay ; :,, , ,. •• 1 000
47.8
Muck,..
Step 8. Divide the total thrust obtained in Stop 1 by the bearing
strength of {he soil JR Rat the area poedpd, tat (Itz).
SIDE THRUST ALTERNATE ?R0CEDjJ4F,,
Pipe Size
541 Thrust-pir popes
in.
nun
lb IQ
1-1l2
38.1
6.1 22.7
2
60.8
7.1) 35.1
2-112
63.5
11.6 51.6
3
76.2
17.1 i' : 76.1
e-1I2
68.9
22.4 99.6
4
101.6
28.3 ,.1'. , 124.9
6
127.0
43.1 ,,:: 1#11.7 .
6
152.4
60.4 270.E
8
203.2
103.0 46Q.2
10
264.0
160.0 711.7 `
12
304.8
4' 224,0 ... 1000.8
• Based on side thrust per 689 kPa (1(W psi) prPgg+r4 Per degree of
deflection.
,.•. s
NOTE:
Multiply side thrust
from table by "degrees of deflection
times kPa
(psi) djvldad by 40g 19 gbta(R total *We thrust in N (lb).
f�

_g_
FRICTION
LOSS
IN
POLYETHYLENE
F30SE
.
F.S.I. FRICTION LOSS PER !00 FEET FOLYETHELIN£.IRRIGATION HOSE (WATER)
D. hm
135
125
120
110
90
3
.82
2.7
75
2.5
63''
2.1
• .50,
1.60
40
1.30
I.D. INS.
4.5
4.1
4.0
3.7
--
0.9
SAL/ 10
--
--
_-
2.3
6.6
30
--
--
--
_" -
_ _
- -
- -
1.4
4.0
11.2
-_ �_
- _
- -
- -
- -
- -
2.1
6.0
16.9
50
- -
- -
- -
1.2
2.9
8.4
- -
60
-
_
_ _
1.0
1.6
3.9•
11.2
- -
70
- -
. - -
- -
_' _
- -
1.3
2.0
4.9
14.4
- -
60
--
'"
.._
1.6
2.5
6.1
--
--
90
1.9
3.0
7.5
100
-
__
1.3
2.3
3.6
8.9
- -
- -
110
120}
--
- -
__
- -
- -
- -
1.6
2.7
4.2 10.5
- -
130
--
--
--
0.7
1.8
1.1
4.4
_
140
-
_ -
- -
0.9
2.1
3.6
5.6
- -
-
--
- -
,150
_-
-_
-_
0.9.
.2.4
4.1
6.4
_
160
- -
- -
- -
1.0
2.7
4.6
7.2
__
- -
170
- -
- -
- -
1.2
3.0
5.2
6.1
-
- -
180
- -
- -
0.9
1.3
3.4
5.7
8.9
- -
190
- -
- -
1.0
1.4
3.7
6.3
9.9
- -
- -
.200
- -
0.9
1.1
1.6
4.1
7.0
210
- -
0.9
1.2
1.7
4.51
7.6
220
- -
1.0
1.3,
1.9
4.9
8.3-
230
--
1.1
1.4
2.1
5.3
9.0
--
`
240
- -
1.2
1.5
2.2
5.7
9.0
250
0.9
1.3
'1.6
2.4
6.2
- -
" '
-
260
1.0
1.4
1.7
2.b
6.6
` -
270`
1.0
1.5
1.9
2.0
7.1
- -
280
1.1
1.6
2.0
3.0
7.6
- -
290
1.2
1.7
2.1
3.2
8.1
- -
. 300
1.2
1.2
2.2
3.4
8.6
- --
310
1.3
1.9
2.4
3.6
9.2
- --
320
1.4
2.0
2.5
3.8
9.7.
- -
33D
1.5
2.2
2.7
4.0-
340
1.6
2.3
2.8
4.2-
350
1.7
2.4
3.0-
4.5-
360
1.7
2.5
3.2
4.7
370
1.8
2.7
3.3
4.9_-
380
1.9
2.8
3.5
5.2
390
2.0
2.9
3.7
5.5
- -
- -
- -
400
2.1
3.1
3.8
5.7
- -
- -
- -
420
2.3
3.4
4.2
6.3
- -
- -
440
2.5
•3.7
4.6
6.8
- -
- --
460
2.7
4.0
5.0
7.4
- -
- -
480
3.0
4.3
5.4.
B.0
- -
- -
500
3.2
4.6
5.8
Ir

SIZE
1.00
OD
1.315
ID
1.195
WALL
0.060
TH K
FRICTION LOSS CHARACTERISTICS
PVC CLASS 160 IPS PLASTIC PIPE
' (1120, 1220) SDR 26 C - 150
PSI LOSS PER 100 FEET OF PIPE 1PSI1100 FTI
Sizes 1" thru 5". Flow GPM 1 thru 1250.
1.25
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00
350
1.660
1.900
2.375 2.875 3.500
4.000
1.532
1.754
2.193 2.655 3.230
3.692
0.064
0.073
0.091 0.110 0.135
0,154
4.00
5.00
SIZE
4.500
5.563
OD
4.154
5.133
ID
0.173
0.214
WALL
THK
O�
J
pfll
,n
ON
dt.7
an
N�
d
Vl p
m O
y prr(/1
yJ
^y
p
rip
J f
J
l
f
1
r
J
&Zd
f 7
1
0.28
0,02
0.17
0.01
0.13
0.00
1
2
0.57
0.06
0,34
0.02
0.26
0.01
0.16
0.00
2
3
0.1
0.14
0,52
0.04
0.39
0.02
0.25
0.01
3
4
1.14
0.23
0.69
1
0.07
0.53
0.04
0.33
0.01
0.23
0.00
4
5
1.42
OL35
0,861
0.11
0.66
0.05
0.421
0.02
1 0.281
0.01
6
6
1.71
0.49
1.04
0.15
0.79
0,08
0.50
0.03
0.34
0.01
0.23
0.00
6
7
1.99
0.66
1.21
0.20
0.92
0,10
0.59
0.03
0.40
0.01
0,27
0.01
7
8
2.28
0.84
1.39
0,25
1.06
0.13
0.67
0.04
0.46
0.02
0.31
0.01
8
9
2.57
1.05
1.56
0.31
1.19
0.16
0.76
0.05
0.52
0.02
0.35
0.01
0.26
0.00
9
10
2.85
1.27
1.73
0.38
1.32
0.20
0,84
0.07
0,57
0.03
0.39
0,01
0,29
0.01
10
11
3.14
1.52
1.9.1
0.45
1,45
0.23
0.93
0.08
0.63
0.03
0.43
0.01
0.32
0.01
11
12
3.42
1.78
2.08
0.53
1.59
0.28
1.01
0.09
0.69
0.04
0.46
0.01
0.35
0.01
0.28
0.00
12
14
3.99
2.37
2.43
0.71
1.85
0.37
1.18
0.12
0.81
0.05
0.54
0.02
0.41
0.01
0.33
0.01
14
16
4.57
3,04
2.78
0.91
2.12
0.47
1.35
0.16
0.92
0.06
0.62
0.02
0.47
0.01
0.37
0.01
16
18
..3.78
3.12
1.13
2.38
0.58
1.62
0.20
1.04
0.08
0-70
0.03
0.53
0.02
0.42
001
18
20
.4.59
3.47
1.37
2,65
0.71
1.69
0.24
1,15
0.09
0.78
0.04
0.59
0.02
0.47
0.01
20
22
'y6.28_
5.48,
3.82
1.64
2.91
0.85
1.86
0.29
1.27
0.11,
0,86
0.04
0.65
0.02
0.52
0.01
0.34
0.00
22
24
�{6,85;
.`6.44
4,17
1.92
3.18
1.00
2.03
0.34
1.38
0.13
0.93
0,05
0.71
0.03
0.56
'0.02
0.37
0.01
24
26
�'.7.31
' 7c47f
4.61
2.23
3.44
1.15
2.20
0.39
1.50
0.15
1.01
0.06
0.77
0.03
0.61
0.02
0.40
0.01
26
28
=f7.99
'9,57.
4.86
2.56
3.71
1.32
2.37
0.45
1.62
0.18
1.o9
0.07
0.83
0.04
0.66
0.02
0.43
0,01
28
30
.::8.57,
9:74
�:-5.21
: 2.91
3.97
1.50
2.54
0.51
1.73
0.20
1,17
0.06
0.89
0.04
0.70
0.02
0.46
0.01
30
35
)'9.99
.12:- .Ir-6'.08
..
j3.87
4,64
2.00
2.96
0.68
2.02
0.27
1.36
0.10
1.04
0.05
0.82
0.03
0.54
0.01
35
4o
y.1;42
1B59
,..
_,�95'4,:95
5.30
:^Ti6'
3.39
0.86
2.31
0.3a
1.56
0,13
1.19
0.07
0.94
0,04
0.61
0.01
40
45
2:85'.
20r -
= 2
' 6 16
6:96
3.81
1.08
2.60
0.42
1.75
0.16
1.34
0.09
1,06
0.05
0.69
0.02
45
50
'!4'�8'
25:07
8;fi9.
49
6.63
�8
4.24
1.31
2.89
0.52
1.95
0.20
1.49
0.10
1.18
0.06
0.77
0.42
50
55
5:7 '
29:9
:y56
93162J
4.6fi
1.56
3.18
0.62
2.15
0.24
1.64
0.12
1.30
6.07
0.85
0.02
55
60
: 54'
3el
0A
99
7`J5Fi
: 5.0q
%=IA3
3.47
0,72
2.34
0.28
1.79
0.15
1.41
0.08
0.92
0.03
60
65
8;5
40i7
129,
?17
8"62O
5.51
2.12
3.76
0.84
2.5d
0,32
1,94
0.17
1.53
0.09
1.00
0.03
65
70
�9:99
b6 76
:96
.9i28,
y+74123
6.93'
2.44
4.05
0.96
2.73
0.37
2.09
0.19
1.65
0.11
1.08
0.04
70
75
,l6
3.03
S$:86
9:94
0821•
6.35
2.77
4.34
1.09
2.93
0.42
2.24
Q.22
1.77
O.f2
1.16
OA4
75
80
R 3:90'
7,'88'
4
10:50
.;mot 22
6,78
, 3.72
4.63
1.23
3.12
0.47
2.39
0.25
1.89
0.14
1.23
0,05
80
85
.:....
�14,77.
.s
20:00
11:Z7,
" 05.
' 7 27.
" 3,49
4.91
t,38
3.32
0.53
2.54
0.28
2.00
0.16
1.31
0.06
85
90
�1,5.64:
22.23
11 93
3,�:5a1;
7.63
.3 88
5.20
1,:53
3.51
0.59
2,69
0,31
2.12
0.17
1.39
0.06
90
95
4,6.51
24.68
12:S9
12t 2
.
8.05
4.29
6.d9
1,:69
3.71
0.65
2.84
0.34
2,24
0.19
1.47
0.07
95
100
.77:38`
`. 7iO3
13; �8
'!13799.
8 48
`4.72
78
1 86
3 91
0.72
2.99
0.37
2.36
0.21
1.54
0
100
110
`9:12.32,24
14_'S8
'16"69
9.33
-5.63
6.36
2:22.
4.30
0.86
3.29
0.45
2.60
0.25
1.70
0.09
110
120
1S.91
1Ag1,
.10,18
6.61
6.94
2.61
4.69
1.01
3.59
0.52
2.83
0.30
1.85
0.11
120
130
17:2.42y74
11.02
7.67
7.52
3.03
5.08
1.17
3.89
0.61
0.34
2.01
0.12
130
3.07
140
18.56
26,fO9
11.87.
8.80
8.10
3.47
5.47
1.34
4.19
0.70
3,31
0.39
2.16
0.14
140
l 0
291.464
12.72
10 00
8.6a
3.94
5.86
1 52
4.48
0.79
3.54
0.45
2.32 1
0.16150
160
13.57
11.27
9.26
4.45
6.25
1.71
4.78
0.89
3.76
0.50
2.47
0.18
160
170
14.42
12.61
9.83
4.97.
.,6.64
1.92
5.08
1:00
4.01
0.56
2.63
0.20
170
180
15.27
14.02
10.41
5:53
7.03
2.13
5.38
1;11
4.25
0.63
2,78
0.22
180
190
16.11
15.49
10.99
6':11
7.43
2.35
5.68
123
4.49
0.69
2.94
0.25
190
17.03
11.57
6'721
7.82
2.59
5
1-.35
4.72
0.76
309
00
225
19.08'
21.19
73.02
8.36
8.79
3.22
6.73
1i68
5.31
0.95
3.48
0.34
225
250
14.47
10.16
.9.77
3.91
7.48
2.04
5.91
1.15
3,87
0.41
250
275
15.91
12.12
-10.75
4,67
823
2.44
6.50
.1.37.
4.25
0.49
275
300
17,36
14,24
11.73
5.49
8.97
2.86
7.09
f1.61
4.64
0.58
300
325
18 81
16.5
i 70
6.36
9 72
3.32
7.68
A.67"
5.03
. 0.67.
325
350
.13.68
7.30
10.47
3:81
8.27
2.15+
5.4,1:
' 0.77y
350
375
14.66
8.29
11.22
4:33
8.86
2,44,
5.80
-'0.87:
375
400
15.64
9.35
11.97
4.88
9.45
2.75'
6.f9
.6.9&
,.58
400
425
16.62
10.46
12.72
5.46
10.04
3.07,
6
.'1:1Y0
425
450
1
1
117.59
11.62
13.46
6.07
10.63
3.42'
6.66
-1. i
450
475
18.57
12.85
14.21
6.70
11.23
3.78
7.35
11-35
475
Soo
19.55
14.13
14,96
7.37
11.82
4.15
7.74
"1,48
500
550
16.46
8.80
13.00
4.96
8.51
1.76k7
550
600
17.95
10.33
14.18
'5.82
9.29:'
600
650
19.45
11,99
15,36
6,75'
10.06
--2.41'.
650
700
16.55
7.75
10.83
'2.7,7,
700
750
17.73
8.80
11.61
3.14
750
800
18.91
9.92
12.38
- 3.54
800
850
13.16
3.96
850
900
13,93
4.41
900
950
14.71
4.87i
950
1000
l
15.46
5.36
1000
1050
16.25
5.86
1050
1100
17.03
6.39
1100
1150
17.80
6.9A
1150
1200
16.58
7.5-t
1200
1250
19.35
8.10
1250
Note: Shaded arras of chart indicate velocities over 5' per second. Use with Caution. . 7 -
(Conrrnued)

`
A
^mm

qw
MR

' ► ���:, r�s•y 7� i < �., -. - to - v 4�•'%:; � S'�'y x�- --r, r:_r7 •,: ,Sx•1 r.�- �'` '. v -, 4
,.r Y .r•1 yam- -i'� �ti4 �� - �► '. `••�•�:Y x � � Y�
A:4 r r, s. rr. r 3 3r s ,CounL�t' otgt Lana -Li Rat,,, pcTrtyr' 6� theS 5e:condrp'ard anCti SOnIesZIme 0 Q
�3
1 It ,1 ,h-. ..� - a- ;r - •k-5'4 t `y' ..� .:
.,'a r . as.:;. LeSSee�a—+IR l3ryer e: r r ryr -e ' •{ iiii.s -?s 1 ~r ? -�
s : '�` Frai<sri ec�'tXc tire. t'errrsr an condttibnsS he (a?:tec:'set"foe�rCfr t L s r rg
"-ij, +,iAw. + at rit .i •'.�'ti+F:1..,:1'-
. : do+► hecel�yr::Teri ande-,Teasstasaid, kessee` an tltes. Lesseerdaes:. hereh'accea; tenant:
L,.r;.CASH .ryrsi¢�y4'^' it'7%a..=.:�K., _. •...-. - .:�'i.Zu—z?', i'..c4.:. ?..F ��-
said3Eessaa:s�-a&Tisclear-e&§rlanaracaed:uparmtha<r. ip ceF•or€;Iea�Ti°es;taiter'srtuat�tnv�;�,�.��xx
SerrtonmUfJL-,Townshrp.•„: Johnstone County„, trortta CarCIT'rrra' mareFparttcwl'acTyF desccrtiediv 1'1
.. M•♦ - G '. --� �13 y.L....t F
BEINiu".Zr 68tacres,: more or Tess;,.asi shawttr on- a -map thereo'entitled ::"Sucveyi ': ;_',NR;:,_
a the G G_. Ada+ns and 5a1 lie: I:- Adalrtsw.Neirs: P.raged7c (R'aynar Farak) ,:" prerrareds tip
Warrick Engineering: & Surveying:. P-_ A_,.: dated-+-A'pr- vac, " T99a--and:- recardedk reMap;r _•'7n` .
Boole 33: at: Page`32;a�- the dohnstara-County-•Regs:i:try-,_ s&id:map:•being±-incorporated:,
here -in: an& bye reference'made< a- pact: hereof-
The- terms:'and conditions: oe this. Tease - are° as: fo1 rows_
1. Tc0ffi_ This- lease• shad 1 begin• as of January' T',. 1997 and: saa.lT end-„ urcrzss:' t
sooner tern:noted-.as..hereirr.provided: on: December- 31,. 2017'_ ii
Z_ REiIT.. During the_ first five- (5) years, or the term,, the Lessee-shal l nay, to- +
the Lessors an: annual rental-' of Sfir.00- per- acre_ for- al T• cleared_ land: Taca.tedsupon:.
sa.id. pre misespayable:'annua:Tiy irr. advance
During.: the: secand:. f Net (S), year terror the:. annua L rents.l. shad.F_-berS7T.G(i per -
acre., th+Y ttttrd_ five' (5)1year•ternv S75_00' per-acrew_ and: the. fourthrfive<C5}::yeah
terns. thewsuuuaFS8Cr00a•Per- acre-.foc.-&Il: cleared:.l'and: iacated:.upaW"Said:prenisesrpayalpFe.,�`:�
annua>1-1y.,!AM.advance•.
3. PURPOSE ANM--USE_. Th•is:Tease<isgrartted for aaricrtitural:purpasesrincTuctingr_-
the growin¢ a crap. ands. the -right. toi user.sa:id: prernises:far the
waste• actstng.fromathE- operatib.mo • as-sitine• factlit}c_
4-_ COMPfar.ANCEW.I:_T'Ff'ERV.TRONMENTgtLUAi�S_, rn-thetspreadingolr•the wastee'here? nr'''_-
cantempTaxe&-_ the; essee` sna:. at. al'... times-_ con:p.ly. vhitti:_a LI, IQca:l:;. StatL-:airds Fedin-
tatL?-�=��
emri ronmertta_1. laves„ rules: and_ regu,lations_
31 ,tA
s:ASSEGNMENhereimre? T' Trrts' Tease:. map bew ass ignedr by- the+• Less et— but only* far the '
purpsae•r'red: to:_
6'_ VTOtAtTOW OF TERMS Uports the, vAalatiorn-of' the: terms: of this lease" bye'
either partp.her'eto-,. the -other• party shall have<-theta-pursue= sucte.
and equA tab:ier remedies: as. eacir may. be- entitled-:
%. APPURTENANM.. This lease. stra-il- be and_•it is hereby declared;-ta-be:.
aopvrtenan.c to: ttrat 30- acre- tract: owned�by the- Lessee' and vrife= desceibe:i:- im that
dee,_ to. the:i- f'roim Sal Tie-L- dams dated: June- 2Z,. 19$7- and recorded. in_ Dank. 1059; at .�
Pace- 305. of the- Johnston Czuncy Reg.iscry, said. teed: being. inccrparaLed here:rr and
t_v eferejce: made- a. parr hereof•
i:l T(:ZiLuQifY WhEREar, parCieS cl 'he fir__ and seconc par" jave-neC�r�Ca: f
'. ��:
;,cir nanas nna �23i= :� the ca, ono year' r,. aCJS'E 'nr;tcerr_ s•
}�- y YyA
_
LessorR7-
yyt
-r� Attorrte at Lavr,_Clintarc,, ttartn�?C�1
This ins ru+cent prepared by Harry FC. Lea, Y " .. ,
� .,�• .. ,. . ,._+r .,. ,ter . .. _ _•
.. . ..•,,r''.. ,u',: o --..::. ..:. •ace •;.• ' !`���• �Sf�"...;.
.r S� i ..'_:. �: ... •h.�-1-:qr. :.,'=-.,�nl•T`Y•rbyi}•Y�'Rr,��fy1+�,�..�y.�.�--y ...�ry�,,.7,r 1•.r�rr■��Y Y;L-�L{1{\�a•Hll..y r +'.; 7rr}a•{;r�y
((�., "I r!11 e�"'�iti °:�:.'.ti� ..':.`YwT^^`..LL•<n�: _rr��,E ��fi. r�ie' �flil` 1'Ci"!3G'iei•-'.�iA:'���]*•;`'.�i'•M7Jfc��'r:' 4:'.'C�C/i�

­. ­ ­_,. _y Icib u��L.IUC[ -Q1, JIIaLG nUa- !ilfCC'.. L[:6i.L..UUCR'•IiC.4Rta".-
Report of Commissioners appainte&ta div_tderther Tand : a.f Murre]-H-.: -Jerrrigan•;t decease&_
or record•:• frc Me- 6& SPA' TT i rr the off-fc& of the! CTerk *of Superior--Caurtaf-lbhnstanx
County,. North• Caral trra,_ sa-ict reprat: heing_incorporated herein. an&by reference rude
a. part, hereof-.
Tha terms ant conditions. or -this lease: are asr folT'ows_ '
T_ TERhr` This leaser sha;1'T beg.irras. of'Januarr 1r 199T_ and shaT.T end', unless
sooner term:ina:tet as- herein. provadedr on december• 3.1 _ 2006-
2_ RENT' During-. tile: f i rst five (5) years. of the• terur, the- Lessee- shal L- pays
ta: ttr& Lessors-arr- annual rental` a S60'_OC- per acre• for- all clearedti land; Iocated� .;
upon. saidrprenises, said`rent&:T.•to.berpa:id:.annuaxlTycin.advancerL' C$_'Z3A_7A ,!CC ,.. .
DLLrfng the- second;Xive:.(5j:,.yearterusa� this Teas�„the•'annrwaT:'rerrtas s8as pe`
S6F-GM per~.acre• for- aitl=cl"earedr lands`located: upow said::preuri:sesspayahTes'annual:Tjr.• iM7.'
'PURPOSE ANFE USE_ This: Tease is_ ranted -for --a ricm turai"�ucposez;4fifeTud n
C 4. 9 P. F9±"::
the'grcWnTatcrops-andatherrightto~use"said:prenisesfor=the:-disposal:6 artfmar7'
wastm_:Arisin9yfrormthe opera.tiorr__>of=,uswfne •factTityr~ R S. =?` tik�S : -4►= :�`
4_ 'COMPEiANEE W.LTH'ENYIROSMEIfTAr� LAWS." Inkthe- sprea&i'ngp at�'the wast6_hereirr t:
contemplated,:_the"Lessee stra . „at aA ki times", comply- witlraTT. luca&'rrState:an&Federa:l:.
environmental'1'aw.s-�.ru:les:�artd:.reg�tlations.� �,;;t;•:.:;; _ _
5_ .ASSEGIIMENT_.• TFtis_lease may.,be,assigned:b)&:the Lessee but=amlyxforrthe:.
purposes hereimreterred:ta•_
:. VIDL•ATrON.0FTERMS _ Upam-the-vio.TatiarroEtheterms:.of this -leaser by,
either party- hereto,. the -other -party shal T haver the right- ta- pursue: suclr- legal.
and: equ.itabJet remedies as. each: maw be: entitled_
T.. APPURMANCY.. This- lease sha1T beand-it is: herehydeclared- ta:be•
appurtenanr= tor that 30 acre- tract: owned,. by- the Lessee-and:wife• described in' that
deed: to thews f ram Sal Tie- L. Adams dated June- 22', 198T and recorde,± im Book 1QS9- at
Pace -?GE of the-Jonnston• County Registrr,. said deed: being- incorporated- hereirr and by
r=ference:madea part hereof.
;a .�:T;i4QNY 'd?;ERC F, ,he- oa--'es c' -.ne- fir.r and second pdre have hereunto
se= :heir hands and. seals as of the- day ana year rirst abovewrittaR.
x�✓Lr'-/i/` (SEAL
?. B_ er igarr
fly:• :.;::::.
This instrument prepared byr Harry M_ Lee,. ALtorner at: Law, CIintD. Narst

16:25 F,AC 910+594+0238 GIs OF NC
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, r.�S- r�� ter, Jr hereby giveasgI,AfR. �,�_rYi
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System right up next to
tmy property line without regards to buffers for the duration of time shown below.
The property line on which waste -can be applied Is shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other
i
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also
understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer,
i
� Adjacent Landowner: =-= �-' ��.� Date:
Waste Producer: Date: / _9 12
Technical Representative: �� Date: / - — Cis
SWCD Representative:_ _Date:
f Term of Agreement: Rtj - 14 19� rl to 613q . 1'-4I.a
! (minimum of Ten ,Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. '-2 . )
l lr �l�J
Notary
UO2
1 1/1.1/9 7 16. Jo ; A 1',X 1�O. 1a 1:; 1J. r�uZ

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
e ItlAs r#?5�-.J hereby give �?a�au �c��''
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System right up next to
my property line without regards to buffers for the duration of time shown below.
The property line on which waste can be applied is shown on the attached map.
l understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops, i also
understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner• �� -f Dater(/ -,fie -rZ
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: wL' Grp Date: 111aoI62
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: //- go -A , 19 S-? to . // -ZQ- ZQZ2-
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost .shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Otary

5rnrr
r 1.
�t
G �F
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Communit, Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury S;rCet + Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor j Stephen G. Conrad
1k Uiarn 01 Cobey, Jr., $ccremr)" uly 25, 19s9 Director
Mr. David Herring
P. O. BON 498
Newton Grove, NC 28366
RE: Arproval to Impound
David Herring Lagoon
Jo ns tcn court"- T
This concerns the subject dam you recently constructed in Johnston Co>-u tv
pursuant to approval for construction on March 6, 1989 as required by the Da:-•,
Safety Lave of 1967.
"As -Built" plan F and specifications and the enuinFer's cei:,_.ification were
received on July 5, 1989. The dam was cartifiec� by l-_:ne
Conservation Service.
A final inspection of tl:i.s cam was made by the Land (ual ity of t_ne
Raleigh Rt gional Office on July 19, 1989. The dam was found to to ir:
with approved plans and specifications and you noy impound nd water.
Enclosed for your use is a? Dam operation Maintenance and Inspection Manual
which contains information on the maintenance A dams for safe o::+?ram tion -ncf
.`6.lzprocc-d r^_s fcz: ornergerir_,' situations. The Land Quality staff %.ill ii'a?-_
periodic inspections of this dam to assure that Ae dam is being zzintained in
GGCC. condition.
Very truly yours, r
Stephen G. Conrad
SGC: se,
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, I'.E.
?W. Harry Gibson
i,l . Wiliiafm d . 11�rrell
rr. Donald Griffin
hlr. Richard Toler
:-tr:- i2sikj,'t . Cif- !w. ! --- ,;;. 'ir,c-;•:,,.,.,.: - -, ;
.A- l:au.iI V„N rani- Amrriau�i Ac,:!..-• i. " .,

David G. Herring Lagoon & Holding Pond
P. 0. Sox 498
Newton Grove, North Carolina 28366
Certification:
I certify that I have made, or caused to be made, a final inspection of this
pond project and that all work related thereto has been completed in accordance
with these plans -and with all other applicable specifications except as listed
on the attached sheet.
(Check here if no exceptions)
Signed r Lla�Title Date

Du.
LOCATWO
Owner
Pciu-a �em-oq
F, 6 1 130A Z9 8
Ne W-hh Grove)
-', IU c
/V
0
kip
arc_!` 7-�: ���+i +, r +;r_"J L1I/I� ���`_ /�'��- �o ��c' - r%
11"'a c
-4� 4
z of P87

LttV V V C1 '
DISL'aTtCa From nearest residence
Soils Humber of Animal Units or Total lbs.
Type Lagoon. ,; .r r,- _ Kind of animals S�';, - =;,,; E, �', ►;�
Volume='G� �� Units X f t. cu. yds.
27
FOLDING VOLUME (waste + rain + 25-year storm
Period.5,• J.. Watershed /, �� acres U�' h
Wasted ;�?-cu. yds. , rain / , ,: ; _cu. yds. f ! f !
25-yr. 3torrn I�t7'�..ati,,�
Total s7 cu. yds. `�a�:a n f 21J6'zl
-AND DISPOSAL �, �
$
0+ total acres
!' _ r �t 1' l r - ,' Q r •'�• . t,• ; /�
FLItTII,ILATTdt3 & SEEDING acres
Lime a T Fertilizer �--�- -T - w , . , ...._._...
r !�
Seed /=L- r .t 5 Mulch_(i�-
� Length Width' G•�JI rrl Tr ^! �
_L r on Width _
'Top of fill - - - - - - - - -elev. S -5`h
Top of holding volume - - - - elev.�44NICt , lc"1C�.t in pornplhj
I !'on of lagoon volume elev.
LT
�� i evaj— ,tntrn,,m Ieve)
4. vnai {-h d at Q j Bottom of lagoon - - - - - - elev, Tiry�n
Emergency spillway - - - - - -elev.
Interior side slopes
� r e r fir--• .t^ �. -i :1.., a—
T, c3•�r�;, _=1�v ��;r�c - IoA o'� fa6r+r,iar� sou..
-
t,.
4.GLt-]i�� i.VC't � prpa^r1�1 71 /� .J✓ r 1J. r TI!'1^ :'f/1"�1�i-e
9
U. S. DEP ARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
-c,�%3 , SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
i
jr--^ � C' 1 e Tate• __.__._... - _
J �! i��; Trued.. ..... ... . ....... Na .t of".., lee
Cnerh.d ............ et ....
SCS N.. •333A REV R-75
r Q

Elev.
30,17
j Anima. aStp System'�or
I fix,
IL
' I
i .< — Aryroxr ?14-1141le
�r-•___.�_—ate,_-�__....—___�+�'-=--+_:.:_ _--=.�-_--_..—�.�r._-______ ::-::
r /DO F
1i Location flan
r8 m
�m �✓"��1wa�F�r/ �J.a j ,
Noa
�- 3co
P ae Flev,Tnue1'1
7' I L
Z.
ry` D4)
43 ?'A.�1
aA�F
u 1 1
.'�a�tr lnio
7
Sketch
S5
7
I; C l g r1 , 01 ' 0 C.
J

V.0"
Producer; E
-�--
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the emb nkment top and
side slopes: ZfjJ/q:4 4COCM04 J5u s is
being established -on these areas. BeginningAn 198q and
each year thereafter, the embankment should -be fertllized
with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by mowing,. spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least monthly. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following: .
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes
a. separation of joints
b. cracks or breaks
C. accumulation of salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2. Lagoon surface
�a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3.1 Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. wet or damp areas on the back slope
d. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of
wave action
e. rodent damage
1

4. Transfer Pump - recycling and irrigation pumps
a. overall pump operation
b. leaks
C. loose fittings
5. Surface water diversion
a. adequate vegetation
b. diversion capacity
C. ridge berm height
B. Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a
total of p : /animals to o -) .
The lagoon contains both permanent and temporary storage.
The permanent storage is not to be pumped in order to ensure
that anaerobic action will occur. The design storage
includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes
capacity for the volume of waste produced over 180 days, the
amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event plus an
additional "heavy rain" factor, and rainf 11 in excess of
evaporation. Your facility is designed f180 days of
temporary storage; therefore, it will need to be pumped
everysix months. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid
level reaches elevation as marked by permanent
markers. Stop ump-out when the fluid level reaches
n elevatio4�2 Pumping can be started or stopped at any
time between these two elevations for operating convenience
as site conditions permit, such as weather, soils, crop, and
equipment in order to apply waste without runoff or
leaching.
The attached waste management plan must be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see
Attachment B) before land application. The waste material
should be analyzed before each application cycle to
determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the area of
application should be made annually to insure the waste is
applied as reasonably and practically possible to
recommended rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be precharged with a volume of
water equal to one-half of the treatment volume before
wastes are introduced. Precharging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon
thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
2

mm
Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush
water and irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below
the surface and as far from the inlet pipes as possible in
order to provide a cleaner effluent for flushing and to
reduce odors when irrigating on land. When these pipes are
placed through the embankment, they should be installed no -
more than two feet below top of dike and not in the highest
section of fill. The pipe trench should be compacted with
clay material.
After five years the waste treatment lagoon must be, checked
for sludge accumulation annually. If sludge has encroached
into the treatment volume, the sludge must be removed and
applied at agronomic rates based .on analysis of the sludge.
Treatment volume must have a minimum of 4 feet of depth free
of sludge at all times.
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) in North Carolina revised water quality regulations
that address animal operations. These rules became
effective on February 1, 1993 (15A NCAC 2H .0200). This
animal operation shall be operated within the requirements
of these rules and regulations.
3

61 m 1 "1
pvc , scit. 40 PIPE,) 3`�
M,rrmum u
CL.FARRNc-F _ 12r
MAXIMUM
2 x8 FREW u
TREAIMD
�j0 . (T i 1 ha yjw �.Ye
Sha)l be galuahitec
�5uppaP,T- Fars
MINIMUM DIAMEM
1JVo„11
QRF55 u,E
��s-�� V)1977Eri P, PE.1

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE -TREATMENT LAGOONS
AND/OR HOLDING PONDS
Clearing: All trees and brush shall be removed from the
coristructioh area before any excavation or fill is started.
Stumps shall be .removed within the area of the foundation of
the embankment and all excavated areas. Satisfactory
disposition will be made of all debris.
Construction: Construction will consist of excavation to
the neat lines and grades as planned. In areas of the
lagoon bottom and side slopes where sandy material is
encountered, the area shall be overexcavated by I foot and
backfilled with clayey material. Excavation shall be by
pan, dragline and/or backhoe. A bulldozer or other
equipment will be used to dress the slopes. Fill material
placed in the embankment shall be free of sod, roots, stones
over 6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable
materials. The fill material shall be placed and spread
over the entire fill area in layers not to exceed 8 inches
in thickness. Construction of the fill shall be undertaken
only at such times that the moisture content of the fill
material will permit a reasonable degree of compaction.
Compaction of all fill material shall be accomplished with a
sheep —foot roller or heavy rubber tired equipment (such as a
loaded pan) passing several times over the entire surface of
each 8 inch lift. To protect against leakage, the entire
lagoon bottom and all excavated side slopes shall be
compacted in the same manner as the fill material
compaction.
Vegetation: All exposed embankment and emergency -spillway
areas shall be seeded to'the planned type of vegetation
immediately following construction.

GI:NIiRAL
These specifications are to be made a part of detailed engineering plans ui Elie pro-
posed embankment, spillway(s), and reservoir.
No changes nor deviations from these plans and specifications shall be allowed without a
written amendment, in advance of change, from the responsible technician of the Soil Conser-
vation Service.
All facilities for impounding water shall comply strictly with all state and local laws
regulating such activity.
The Soil Conservation Service salcc; no warranty, expressed or implied, of the impounding
structure or the water holding ability of the structure.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF:
A. Landowners:
The landowner will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications
to determine that' the completed structure will fulfill his present and future needs. Inspection
during construction will be the responsibility of the landowner.
He may request inspection by SCS employees during construction and upon completion of work.
Where benefits are to be received from Government agencies, or when the dam falls under the
Dam Safety Law of 1967, inspection and approval by SCS employees are mandatory.
B. Contractors:
The contractor will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications,
conditions at, the site that may affect his schedule of operation, and the location and meaning
of all stakes on the site. Failure to do so will not relieve him of the difficulties and cost
pursuant to satisfactorily completing the work .in compliance with these plans and specifications
and any written or verbal contract with the landowner. All bench marks, grade, and line stakes
will be left undisturbed and protected by the contractor to facilitate construction and in-
spection.
The contractor, weather permitting, will schedule his work so that he will start on the
agreed date and work will be a continuous operation until satisfactorily completed. All
damages occurring to completed work or materials, by the elements or otherwise, during con-
struction, will be the responsibility of the contractor. Partial or damaged work and/or re-
placed materials damaged from any cause will be paid for by the contractor.' Absence of in-
spections during construction will not relieve the contractor from completing the work in
strict compliance with these plans and specifications.
Upon completion of the work', before -moving his equipment, the contractor will request a
final inspection by the landowner and an employee of the SCS. The contractor will then receive
approval that all work has been completed satisfactorily and/or he may complete those items that
vary from the plans and specifications in order thatt-a final inspection will result in approval.
C. U. S._Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service:
The United States and its employees are' :in no manner a party to any verbal or written
contract between the landowner and the contractor. SCS employees, within limit of personnel
available, will inspect and advise on techniques during construction to assure satisfactory
compliance with the plans and specifications.
SCS employees will, upon reasonable notice, conduct a final inspection for strict compli-
ance with all plans and specifications concerning this structure. Inspection will determine
the satisfactory completion of work so that (a) approval may be given for the eligibility of
the landowner to receive benefits from any Government agency concerned with this structure,
(b) final payment may be made to the contractor, and (c) the pool may be filled under the
provisions of the Dam Safety Law of 1967.
-2-

U. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
Jug+) }�;�,�/ HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner ; - e �-r County : —U) ),,,, ; - c' i,
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam 13 Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Lst. Elevation
Kind of
.:Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width:
Slope: Land Use
Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft.
%:
N 0�1 P_
Ft. Ft.
SDo
2
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach(; r,r .0r- da rr, "0 E . /0.55 4 11,f_e_-,.l,,,•� t
Hazard Classification of Dam 6) b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) tL
Dam Classification 0 II, III, IV, V)
By n ;,
name (title)
Concurred By_
name n title
�r� C
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date y i2
Date ��`7 "e1
z jZ� 99

SCS-ENG-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rer. 5.70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME i f 3 DISTRICT $ Y:
DATE Z—z— Bel COUNTY
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO, WORK UNIT
WATERSIIED AREA MEASUREMENTS Lagoon C a�
E,)hOP61010 a ;Qog n�.crsrn.c. W, SHoy
POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIU.;IST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale I" a feet)
Q O coo 50 Larafy dglervnce fins in Mr lin�fdaenrily on !retch.
o
sa
I
z too
—r —
�
I
1
I
D
I
SHOW
1)EIm{
SCAI.F.
BORING NUMBER AIND PROFILE
.Nrrhr rr,:d 1,1 d.im sirs and snNlway bonnus /i+sf )here ponded areaand humrw pi! hannpj • senargr* Willic'rttca! real lint.
/Cumin wed an buck where necessary! Show water dable rlrcanuns on dam-sife bann Qs.
1
2
3
11 4
,, 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
^13
14
15
16
17
18
19 1
20
1 21
22 }
i
23
0-6
5p
sP
SP
Sp
SP
� Z
SP
SC
I1-18
5a
SC
lC
sc
sc
-
"—
1 $-Z
SP
CL
SC
I SC
Z4- Lb
G, P
CL
C
SC
SC
sm
j
30 36
CL
ICL
I SC
SG
m
I,
$
GC
SC
CH
SG
CL
SA
it
-5
CL
SC
SC
SC
C H
Sly
!I
5*-%OCR.
SM
SC
SC
Cal
EN
II
6L-G6
NIL
sM
I SC
SC
Sc
ML
6b-7
SS
sr� � sm-j Sr
Mu
SC
Sc
M
I
!
831 avl-e 11,, CSMrYh - C
HORINGS MAI)h By Iq '„� b Grd in SIGNATURE & TITI-FL-

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW - well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
GP- Poorly graded gravels
g- gravel
s - sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs -very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
al -sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -grovel mix
fsI-fine sandy loam
SP - Poorly graded sands
l - loam
SM - Silty sand
gl-gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si-silt
ML -Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
siI -silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
MH - Elastic silts
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
ci - clay loam
sicl - silty clay loam
scl -sandy clay loam
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
I
c -clay
le
1. Suitable material for embankment is available Yes Q No andicare where loc iv on rn. st.rc.� on
r+wrw side)
REMARKS:
2. Explain hazards requiring special attention in design (Seeagpr. aprrnJ.. rwA etc:
i
GENERAL REMARKS:
Ares 0-F +r'e fa9oar, b6r,i and cut` sl)pes -f'rU�i '
Cuf ink? sa n "II melt` ev'ia 1 w 1)1 heed ��-1f o b e sea /&a w�A I'4
q� j e45 i 0, 2 jayer Of C)ayey rnQ7�rla �, I
24
25
26
27,
28
j .29
30
3111
33 11
33
34 11
35 11
3611.37
38
39
4011
41 42
1 43 i
44
45 46 147 !
4F i
49 i
50 Ij 51
i
f
!
I
AALI
,
_ _
—
`_
I�I II +
L- 1
,I j
+I .f # �'I +�� �
i I - ___-
III'—
�� 1

�� I i1 ' � .r.. � " � — J !`� Y � u � ^ � Y ��^ 4 !�.°, r •^, 1 .. "1 J �: = . f ' . :1 .. '.i j �/ v � _' .' .. .
ri ou ej
r
L�iif[1
7

PC) ----- ---
Tc �. lso y3;, �» J >8�0)-qfl tvl.--C—i9fa —C
63�
ay y
ell(
O'n CL , j
1�� O-T

:t
1
r -
� � y --1fD
ree
eV-

Ts
U-4
w x
_ ._. _ ._. ��o �.0 �_L�.� �p �__.__� r7.Gron_c_fir�e� / ti �a—Sp .e _._ 0 7-' 7�'��.Y—J�!' �t'.� _Y�� �_� . __._ - -
00D c
.._.__.__ . �}6�-0.0 0-1 � s _ - _ Z�_��s//35�=_'Z oo U _.1 � s-----���r-�� � "--- �.------- ------�----
Yoh 07,
.._..-----.__�Z do v _ � bS..� __X %O/..�d5.5._ .r .:. ���_�_I�s__._ .._._.... _.�/._>�.D-o .1 �3_ ��s'o�.r��_._ �tir�c='
--------__.C,.,4a..5_!_a„!___.Ve.1r'r�.�.�!a.-Ya35__.---�.� ��..l�5---�/►�c��Y.___..___..._._...._.---.--------..--._-__-____.
.._—__'`"0:� S i�, i .. ��-/r�,1-1�+,��.5� .l� - ---Sb� ��S �� ��Q � �iY'.._ _i1��G_n _�..�:��.h_(__.'�1-_. j�?" �1,7i'��'I�'E;r,�'\�--
ai; 1 iv�%��i. O'ii�'11 �U�� I� f.r�1 �G'� 1f1/0-G/fAr (�;�/117� 1��
L
a

'---------' ----'
-23
-- -----�-r-- - ----- ----
' ~�
.2-49 4--.X4k Z&-e

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please t% e or Urint all information that does trot rep wire a signature)
EYistirii' or" .Nets' ..,or `. Exrarided :'`(please'circle.one}
Name of Farm:A-Ili Ilerri&a Facility No: �U --j:�Z
Owner(s) Name: , tr-,lVe I-r^;Phone No: �2/% 2�
Mailing Address:
Faun Location: 03 doe O;Z 6/16-Dv- o County Farm is located in: :rzv�
Latitude and Longitude: a; E .19 &,7 I ,,3 Intearator:. � 5
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, mile
Operation Description:
Ttipe of'Sn•ine No. of Animals
J Wean to Feeder
J Feeder to Finish
D Fwow to Wean
7J-Farrow to Feeder
t Farrow to Finish
Gilts
J Boars
T+rpe of Poultry
_1 Layer
r Pullets
No, of Animals
Type of Cattle
;1 Dairy
,D Beef
No. of'Aninials
Orher Type of Livestock: __ Number of Animals:
Grpand+rig CJprrarian O�i!}
Previotq: en1gn Capacrn _ _ .. AcIdiironai.:Derr�pr:Ctrperc 1V.. ':Tornl Desi.¢n Ctpacitr.
.. _...— _
Acreage Available for Application: - s Required Acrcaec: ,(/�..;711 z� z�--
_
Number of Lagoons I Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: M Cubic Feet (ft-l)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: ITS or 60) (please circle one)
If YES. are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner I Nianager'Agree,ment
I (we) ,verify that all lie above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for We farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to die existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to tie Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand [hat there must be no discloar,e of
aninvA waste from the storage or'application system to surface waters of the state either directly duough a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we).understand that run -oft of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Sen•ice. Tirc approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at die office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) knew that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the 'Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation, A change in land ownership requires written notification to DE,NI or a new certification of the approved
plan is changed) within 6O days of a title trarpsfer.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: e�e ate:
Name of Maria", r(it ditterent from ow er): S '.D 2
Signature: Date:
ALYC -- August 1, 1997 1

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Consmatiou Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certifv that die animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of die Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and die USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or die
Nordi Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), die technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
J Existin2 facility without retrofit (SD WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation ' v; storage capahility consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
J New,,ecpanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systenhs. lagoons and ponds,
have been designedtomeet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): LJ r/5 _ /1�1� s15"/22:9
Affiliation "C Date Work Completed:
Address (A�enc �� Phone No.:.
y):
Signature: Dater
B) Land Application Site WUP}
The plan provides form eparations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_
Affiliation Date Work Completed
Address (Aaency):'T616'1X_5 r . '� Phone No.:
Signature: Date:_��
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
-ZFacility without exterior lots (SD o WUP r RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior
.j Facility with exterior lots (RC),
Methods to minimize die run off of pollutants from lounging and Heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): (1_)i"_I 5i
Affiliation ate Work Completed: 1-1»
Address (Agency): Rozwer# /'r4 �� Phone No.: ` - �Y
Si _nature: Date:
A% C -- August I, 1997 2

t9Aui`d 6-' Ilery.,'019
D). Application and Handlinf, Ectuiament —PC JYry
Check the appropriate box
J Existia zoux •tpandin;_t',tcility % Ut_e-c>Stin; waste applicitinn equipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste nimagement plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by die plan at rates not to
exceed either lie specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
-/e plan),
ew, an cd,or existing facilliv witliout existitlz_wastean"icaU011 eainntAJIlt 1iwrav itrhxation. (1)
D
Name
Affiliati
Address
Sianatut
Animal waste application equipment specified in file plait has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by Elie
plan at rates not to exceed either die specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjusuuent guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
New—ccnanded,_Or existin8 facitity wid-tout existine %vaste armlication_euuionient for land sprcadin2 not using
spray iiXigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply .waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover tie area required by die
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tinting of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). ,
E) Odor Control. Insect_ Control. Mortality Nlana-ement and Emer; encv Action Plan (SD,
S I. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Mmagement Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in Cite waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be�tiplemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _btz.5 LL 'p L _
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): .5' r, �-z.7s-V Phone No.:,
Signature: �M-' , , zz�
Date:_
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Siv_ine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If file facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded.
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine fame. The notice was
in compliance with lie requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of rite notice and a list of die property owners notified is
attached,
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Dame of Manager (if different from owner):_
Signature: Date:
A%VC -- August 1, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: _ _ _ _ Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check. the appropriate box
lid"emThe cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
_l Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; We cropping system
as specified in the waste utilizaton plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (mondi/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with die wasteutilization plan.
� Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in die plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification,, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (please Print):
Affilia
Addre:
S ignati
'4/h This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization pl.ui,
and if appropriate to establish die interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 1i calendar days following die date specified in die conditional certification. I («xe)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of die waste management plan and will subject me (us) to in
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:. _ Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
A%VC -- August 1, 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls front Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lets
A/s Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
Fur facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed. -
Address (Agency), Phone No.:
Signature: Date:_
D) Anlalication and Elandliniz E(iuioment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the�ap�wpr-iare block
itd Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is oil site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the; owners and are contained as ptu,t of the plan.
;J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with die requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of die plan.
:J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by y (month/da}'lye;ir); there is adequate
storage to hold die waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in die plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of die plan. V
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): %tor s
Affiliatio
Address (Aaenc
Signature: �
-4 Date Work Completed:
ny [- Phone: No.:.;212 - 2L,-I —31;tli
Date:-Z2_ 2,;
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in lli D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling? equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of [fie waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DENT.
Name of Land'Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality iVlana�ement (SD. St. 11 UP. RC or 1)
tMe hods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan h4� 4Iso been installed and is�op rational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): (..-Pry 5 U, _D/ ,1: 2Z
Affiliation S Date Work Complcted:
Address (Agency): e< C Phone No.:
Signature: Dater
A%VC -- August 1. 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Croup
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- August 1, 1997 6►

T-1 AT
Cem
r+', i ��•' /I I /�� ,° t� r iy� mil'., ��� /
; BF�O
VTNVtUf- BATnEGA
Cem M 16 t + i . . - CIJ. ` IS7AjE IUSTORS� Sr
If
1171
.!, 1�,,, J �.� � - , -� /' ��� -- � I �'-r �'_ � \ �-�^+.`.•,__ � Cem\ -a Cem f ' - w 1����
Harper'pz
\ +C
JIM
'�� � � Ill '� i -� --�'1� � S�� 1191 7e � � r �i 7 1� }✓ 1�
r7
f / t J p �__ /�•�J y
I(�1A�� � ,�5/ j r
"r.- � � i`fly/ '` � L � '_ , - � ' per ;• �I
) rq v
>�. i ° �� '! ` \� � .I•• Cal% i
Cem
M. WOM
am 190,
GD f r Towers
1103.
5 J/ 1

(2oPy 1 A lyl
q'4/)'�
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919- 571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-989-5050
SWCD 919- 989-5381
NRCS 919- 989-5381
This plan will'be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.,
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be 12osted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a.
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate.
C.
Stop
all flows to the lagoon
immediately.
d.
Call
a pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water is
entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -•-
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to,.catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
.the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
E. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
,waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your CWQ
(Division of water Quality) regional office; Phone
919- - After hours, emergency number: 9! 9-
i33-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. if spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-989--..5050.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989-5380, local SWCD
office phone number 919-989-5381, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: t o iu io
b. Contractors Address: c cr
C. Contractors Phone: - /0- 8 -3 "O
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name Chris Smith
h
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by ❑WQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
of �utlefnpnlworalarngac[alen.ad
avo1 12.96

Swipe Farm Waste Management Odor. Control Checklist
Cause — HIN-11's lu lllirrimize (blur Site Specilic Praclices _
l-;linisIc;id Swine pIoductio[i gelative or wouded buflcrs;
;1-,v-C1�Co1I1j11Ct1dCd best Inanaycnrcnl practices;
91-1�00od judgnicnl and common SCIISC
r\niortE bcul�' sui Caccs - �I )il [y Inatlme-covel ell czllinrals 1)Iy !lours-
F!ot?I surd;ices WO majime-cf)veled duals
IR'Slutted tluocs;
\Valercrs localed over slotted Iloot s;
l3 1I' ccicrs at high cod orsolid liuois;
:2S
rape m:uime, buildup hUln iloms;
Underlloor verililaiiun fur drying
h-lamile cvlleclion pits a Urine; P-1-requcnt manure removal by flusli, pil recharge,
• !'arlial miclobial decomposition scrapc;
Uriderlluur venlilalion
Ventilation exhaust fans Volatile gases;
Dust
Indoor SUIIaces 01 ) I I M
Flush tanks Agitation of iecycicd lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
9-" Fan maintenance;
t� i:[f icicnt air movement
I� VJl;tshdami between groups ur;titiinals;
� �I. d additives;
I� !•-ceder covers; A,1A
9' Deed delivery downspout extenders to fecder /b/4 -
covets
C) Flush (auk covers;
0 Blend fill lines to afar bottom or tanks with
;in[i-siphull vents
Flush alleys Agimlion daring wasteivalcr Underfloor flusll With undcilluor vclllilaliun
conveyance
Iechatl,c puinls Agi4lliun ufrccycled lagouti ❑ Extend recharge toles Io near buttVnl of pits
liquid while pi(s are filling will] anti -siphon vents
Lill s(aliuns Agilaliun (luring suriip Iank 0 Sump (ank covers - — --_
lilling;oicl drawduwn
Volside Chain cuiEcc[iori Agilalitrn during was(evaler O Box covers
or juncliurl boxes conveyance
Ahlt)C - Novcmher f 1, 1990, Page 3

(,alrse
4 IIM1'5 tU 1�'11111111i7.0 UfIUr —_-- -- —5lie Specillc I'raclices
1:11d of (hlllllpipes ;it
Agll;1t1mi tlill'ing Wastewa(cr
❑ Extend discharge point of pipes utidcrncalh
I;Iguun
-
curlvcyancc
lagoon liquid level
f.agooll SI111'accs
•
VOlatlle gas cluiss]ulls;
lagoon liquid capacity; '
•
Biological Iilixillg;
��Proper
a--- Orrcct I1goon startup proceduics;
•
Agitation
�'i"/"Millimuni. surracc arca-lo-voluille ratio;
ill if11till] agilatioll when ptlillplllg;
hY�Iccllanical
�' neratioll;
❑ 11 vcn biological additives
II I igatioll spi'ink- ICI'
01
Iigll pressme agilatiolr,
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles
•
Wind drill
@,,,r/Miniululn rcconuncndcd operating pressure;
G 1'timp inlake imar lagoon ll[Illid surface;
❑ himp From second -stage Iagooll
Slolave Ialrk or basin
01':Iltial
Inicrubial deconlposilioll;
❑ Dottont or midlevel loading;
sinl:Ice
&
Mixing while tilling;
❑ lank covers; ,(,�
•
nailalion when eiliplying
❑ Basin stn'ra�e ]hats orsolids-, /" 14
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling baslll sm I;1CC
0
P;n llal microbial decompOsidu]t;
❑ Exleml drainpipe outlets Urlderllcallt h(luld
•
Mixing wattle filling;
level;
•
ngil:llioll ►vllen cnll)rying
❑ Remove settled solids regularly
Marime, sItmy or sludge
•
Agi[,a[iU]l WIICll splCading;
❑ Soil injection ofslurry/sludges;
splCade F. uulicis
9
Volatile gas cil►issions
❑ Wash residual immure from spreader alter use;
❑ hoven biological additives or oxidants
Ullcoveled Inallme,
•
Volatile gas emissions While
❑ Soil Illjectiun of slurry/sludges ^^^
shliry or sludge oil field
drying
❑ Soil incorporation withht 48 his.;
sill'f:ICCs
❑ Sprcad in thin uniruain layers for rapid drying;
❑ 11 Oven biological additives or Oxidants
Dead animals 0 CuI Cass (leconipusilioll W- 1'per disposilion ofcaicasses
I)c;ltl ;I(I1111;]I d151 tt1s;11 0C'alcass decurliposllioll Coinplele covering of carcasses in burial Ails;
pits ❑ Proper loci tion/Collsirlictioil ordisposal pits
lncineralols IIICOnFI]1Cte CUnIb1Is11011 ❑ Secondary slack-bin'ners
nMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
` ti,nt►tt
f't�use
— JIM111; to Coutrul Insccls-
Site perifir Pr aclices
__ -----
Liquid Systems
1=1u"h Ciuucrs
• ACCIlmtllati011 of solids
blush system is designed anti operued
sufficiently to remove accttmulatetl strlids front
gutters as designed.
/
R-l'iemove bridging of accunutlated solids at
°
discharge
k1go +,rs and His
Crusted Solids
Maintain lagoons, sculing basins and pill where
pest breeding is apparent to utiinintice the
cnrsling of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
I:at:esSivC VeLclati%'e
• Decayingvegetation
S Maintain vegetative control along banks of
I innVllr
lagoons anti Other impoundments to prevent
acctmulation of decaying vegetative nlatler
along watees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
cc,fct -- -- • Fcc+l Spilhize f7 Design, uperale awl maintain feed systenrs (c.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
Cl Clean tip spillage on a rOu1h►e basis (e_g., 7 - 10
day interval during sutmner; 15-30 day interval
_ during winler).
ec+l til++r,,Zc ACL'rinitrlati01IS Of feed rcSiduts lteduee nroistttrc aecinnnlalinn within and
around irnmcdiale perimeter of iced sloral;c
arerts by ill seti+rt; thaivagt: away tium silt
and/or providing ade(lnate containment
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high.
moisture grain prothrcls).
n inspect lirr and remove or break up aecnmuialed
solids in filter strips around fecal Sltrrat;e as
needed.
A M IC - r1t,vem1wr 11. 1996, Page I

Sniirce Cause I1MI's to Control Insects Site Specific Praclices
Animal 1luldiug; Areas • ACCumulaliOtis of anin►al wastes O Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along;
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
_ minimal.
171 Maintain fence rows and filter -strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
fury t.lallllre I lan,llinv Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage on,a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Sp�ncnts clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
(uring; winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
171 Provide for adequate drainage around nnamtre
stockpiles.
rl Inspect for and remove or break op accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more inlunnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, flox 7613,-North Carolina State l lniversily,
1talciLI, NC. 37695-7613-
AI+ W - tluvcm1wr 11. 1996. Pare 2

Mortaiiov Management N-Iethods
which mcthod(s.) are being inipicincnied
'Burial three fee; beaeatli the surface of the L,round -xi:hin =' hours aft.-:
knowled,Je of the death. Tee burial must be at least -',COf.-.-: rrom any glowing
stream or public bode of water.
:I Rende inL, at a rlende.,ing giant licensed under G.S. 106-1
Te""' Complete incine,ation fIp.s ol)e a.-clrt,rcl
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit cf a size and design
approved by the Department of Agn'cultur2
` i Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State. Veterinarian would;
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animai's %'aiue without endangering. -
human or animal health. (%Vritten approval of the State `'eterinarian must be
attached`

u
Ce
/iI �! t'ri � � +f i! 1 l � f.,1 r" � • o �� �t / 1 •.. (' .% � `• '7�c=.
J -CeFT
If
u 11 � /" /�p�� �� B��TONVII�E BArmEGRI
16 41 `IJ..' (STATE Hi STORI SIT
D 6M
r` I
is
n.- 02.4
..:i
1��/
�%- -
a 1187 -
GRadW-
Ce
15
Ream
i'��� •-.ram { �. ,+

I A f` ECiL I VED
3 7' 3

i

,;.A, ! Nr:'4 'k.t :�- ii•. ltl�'yi, i°_,lrr,4,1 •Y h' _ i /'' .i
::r. ,ry�1; •�1 -4 �r,' � Ir *.' �+� Y��II� �V. ;trr�- ••1 l'A r.4 `�'= '1
.. :1 f'r�. :�i, ',f'•1. y:1 a 1 •� ��1 •';�"•f.,...±�'y 7, �,1 ��••if•i.
_ r°.�� �i:�. •1��5, '` �f 1 '/J� - ! err ;•:.t+ F r;!}
Y 11''•�+^ :f. 1. �1• ., ' r l{�" `I % f1�1� � + f 1' f ''
' rJ� � A +.^ ,11r Zi 1: � .r M -i ,�G' �I••f. r ♦':• 1
y,�'. -., �.y.'�f: J '�� •r�r, �1;,�'t, r 1 r S• r f .��
i A
L -i1 ♦' l ! lj� ,;r1ti •.y+�%�' r y ,� 1,1^ !1 I'I ,'•�.
jV
Y•lyw. if'� f+L�f. �7'y�.1 + 11�•, r ,f 4�i+.
iy
rli'r' �'1 k r' �,���"��:' r�� X�`.+'1'��Yti '+fr�l; ���� Y y..�1�•ri lir'i
<r , Ij `, , IL1.. �,',', y. ��`H;' {4 + •!. ! r .� ItFj��r�iJ•'lyyw�! , irC =i .%'.a/r�
rr , 1� �t� r•i .1 ( '�' '' a i� i ►,::%+i•j A�*y�f. t �,1+: '.
t � r
• v of • �} r ,1 -�}:-+' • ._.,• :�I 1.. � t .. •` ;(��
it t • '.t -��� t Sri ti' ti`�, ritJl J)'( '7f. ,i [ ti•.� t ]�,{��
.a�.l.tt:� �' :r_ `i',i' f' ';�l(4.'+'�L, r�..'1►.;y .1 r!, .�+1 r ,r 1 y •'?+.�/'.r+Irir i,.•.
� ��• .] + � .11 t ��a �7J Sri• 1� rl •: !'' •�:' . � r l''I .J •'' •� -�, +�. w...
„�,+It y i r •!. i;/r+IM ,J <1 -i• SI•. '}l,��rbt, Sl.l r� r' { r •�, �UN5
t, I t � / :• r 1 _ -i ,; r".IK ..a i,L::,!s.k�Jw�G�� - �!`'� �>" :'�rr111,� d 7 �f •• �� �'. • ��fi.n,
py
�� J; � 7 �' t •14 r�:. y: 4r!• r' ���: i.i• 1�• ,it � Y �� }k'! +,:; r.. r h �-
r +� _ f } 11 • a� n"�n ,��.r" � , r 7 �f'' 3 4 f r S ti
r rl sa. l r, • •�y�• f ,M 'S't\� Call + • r l l�.•Y r' �+.,• y •r:i,
r.. 4 y fir, l :•. r' ', `�.
�1 1 •; - Y 4 rr�r i I+,try ,+
� is � + ,�I' A � 1 �' F � 'r - r _I. � r •} - 6 !9`� t��[�r 1 -l' ,�7,
•1 r '� v 1 ;� 1,, ';; r� n _ t r + .r / ' ' .L t d r ; • .' :',-.,.. r I �:
TLL,.��.y� 1e?I'A''ilI �i'?. i ILS 1 i. i ,�.�i1� �� •R+1' 'n +'��try �r ! + �'i }��.� ,.tr µ i
71�1f;"•{�'••I:..S y�r+.l,;�., 1�.1 .� � /r� 'mil - t1� + I `Jy..: :-�' i.•. ., .. •y� •,+:
,0 i,t �� +' 'i'eL*� `, 1'•.LLL: '. A'l�' t� � ,. . - .r 'I :. :rw�,{ fi
tirr `' �r j�. '• 1 ;t;• . �. �• r? .,t,i it tit t.' t,� r '�ti l � � +.
re r r; �, ' '+•� '. r-1 r •���' !V ss h• t r r-.
� : r T''r / 41o ' •' r r , • N{''r J 1 +j 1 -'} * JL • . a `+ `� ; t.. t ,',
. i •F t'tr'•r �I:�.. yi �t7F �1 •r t•'�t� a� 1• '� :r ,,� +a
1+ f•Z1 ( 3 r I,1 { ' F �, u•, r } ti; - r �1 1 ,,. 1 ••
'`t .. it � a `y: - * •� �•t,t. `_' ;' .t� 'r ,'L ; t ' � ,fir' ,.• � ..
;•• �. i . �} � r . 11 ••., . r •, ti ,'•'.'� i7- w•..+'.'w ` I ti .r ti.

.► a - r` . � rr .
r. ' E
r�
t
S•,I.i'iiY !r r t .�. �` � 1. 1 ,:+i �.Ilr�WJX�
f 'R
r 4"
1
V } v
A.- a i 4 J{,
. 7 .4 e S:f 1' •...� •.r't.�lr r' Y
. Tl�.' .k �N�.S.e''4i' :IC♦ ,���r i�i,"�.Y� •��J Y� c,
1,ea
l f
s :kiia`
All
60
}
•J�. 1
} i i
t
"t.
.9 '
+�
•1
11 �� �.57v
r
�i
. b r• 8 I
,• 1
h
.4�
ti
T — f+i
2-0
0.4
,tip � AAc .. + d �,�, E�. � �� �!� „rx:�4• ���. �r '`�ry
Ey": .0 Y✓ _/7�'c 1 7/a3c], .;; 1 +i� _ ,-!•• tip'> Vi -:. ,�
�.�. �, `�/., �y k�l'i�5 1 �' r - N -as .a.••la :'/^ a,�"i F�. j + y4.
�.^r•' ! - i ', r,•14 x 1,3f{�„_y,r 4. I / ��� .tl 1. • r'36 �r • .� \\� � y^r �'- rr' ,y,� � i
i• tj ,r r 1dd� ! o� •! ,IJ� �' _ �� d�'. r,► J v:"� '} i�p ,�;,::.. Is�,., ntl
;,,7wp t�l�•�a,,.w;, w �!•' �':'�h`-r� f`�'t �jA;.•
1'Sw •r�[-r-381r� „�✓.,,•r,:� �/ q �'-t,r'ixY''7� .�i ryi •.F 1 1.�,"'✓✓✓'' y''ilt�.r i .4T.f
rS a / �I 0. • , •
AiP
I k:� a^ •� ./ 1y f aiv, `�• �.. �`4i�� na;�.'`f. 'rR.%1 ` -�•�a �.�f�+�'. [�� y={ ��{
f. �,.fi,. ti �.� 1 � •R rf .. ,. x: S' � 1 "` . �,� 'Y , }bay
• � /.'t ,r,KiS �/ r �j��{ ' R: �•�R' I��Js� �„a " �����'n�. � ems, �:�4°'
'�l • ,' r�,w '� o. .� rt '1 / 'S�'I r�34'; / �S. 111 '� :,�,1 �'r��.yS�. ,.p`t, �ir.• � ��{� �""7��: .M�< �Y�'�',,, ,
\�k�„t ! I- �,�! f �li A":5`f✓f�• II Tr"'T `�t..r r„ ,�
�f 7f+ .F�, - �,`�ti � �f�? .;'6.A7 d':r•- I + � � 10� bC �"t�r�I
�"..4; k L�`i` iT'�efat. ��F�y74i���1'ff�:�� ��' hj��' �'•R��
fy y_ a.�
IG +'
i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN T REQUESTED
David G. erring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Farm Number: 51 - 63
Dear David G. Herring:
F?WA
A 9 011fth 00 dfiW0MNN0EddLM1
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that David G. Herring Swine Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-
215. l OC, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of
this letter, your farm has sixty (601 days to submit the attached application and all supporting
documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996),
Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by
the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your
application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Nan -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
Sincere
K
Kerr T. Stevens
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
David G. Herring
David G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 9
Newton Grove NC 28366
Dear David Herring:
1 � •
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50LJRCE5
October 13, 1999
i
MAR : 7 2000
'1
I I
Subject: Application No. AWS510063
Additional Information Request
David G. Herring Swine Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by November 12, 1999:
1. Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any
site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
2. Please submit an Operation and Maintenance Plan.
3. Please submit an Insect Control Checklist, an Odor Control Checklist and a Mortality Management .
Checklist.
4. Please submit an Emergency Action Plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when"providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before November 12, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
erely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

: ..x
Exikfn
eral Infori
Name of Farm-
Owner(s) Nami
mint all infomiation diaiAm noi"ir
"q w
Nerr;,o z7
, Aoo�.-,-Ir' In -
Cr
Facility No: .:V -- j:r,3
zo,�1&�
-Phone No: --
Operation DeseriRtion;
ol'Swirte No. of Aninials Type of Poulin! No. of Animals Type of Cattle No'. ofAninrals
0 Wean to Feeder -1 Layer" :D Dairy
to Wean
to Feeder %
0 FwTow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
0 Gilts
D Boars
Farm Location: 0
with,
,
Type
aFeeder to Finish rj Pullets M BeefFlow0 Flow
Farrow
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification,
Please-tvne or
66'ire'a'sNnatureJ
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage*.
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds Total IZ�pacity:4447P0 Cubic ' ic Feet (ft3)
,
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or 60) (please circle one)
If YES. are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON. or SPRAY HELD (please circle one)
Owner / tManager'Agreernent
i (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in die approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures, I (we) know that any expansion to flee Existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use -areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. "Tire approved plan will be
riled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of title era sfer."
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date: lo?11-51
Si -nature: /-;f //5
names
directions, mile
Date:
A%VC ­ August 1, 1997
Mailin2 Address: e'1YC 26'. 3,6�
3'C);4 0.2 0//5;25v-f0 County Farm is located in: ki gg 71,o U
Latitude and Longitude:..Z_-1j- _12 cZ_ 2L gZQ__ SY Integrator- e5?_Z_S
Please attach a copy of a coun y road map
c lo'ation identified and describe below (Be specific: road

- Technical Specialist Certification
*e Uilik'de`si hated b the _.. i .-,,.......
�. ' Asa technical s "� North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F ..0005,A certify ; thar. t1w,animal waste management system for ,:the farm named above has an animal waste
nanagement plan that meets,of:,.exceeds standards and specifications -of the Division: of, Environmental" Management
(DENT) as specified in "15A NCAC 2H.0217 'an&the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation .Commissiod'pursuunt to 15A NCAC '2H,0? 17 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC,1), the technical specialist should only certify.parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection,, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
J Existing facility with.Qut retrofit (SD WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for. operation ' y; storage 'capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements. ;;,,
New, expat}ded or retrofitted ' eilil (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): '�
Affiliation 'Date Work Completed: g, " rff��
Address (Agency): Phone No.: —.'.
Signature: Date:
B) Land Ap12licat!2n Site &ieparations
The plan provides form (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): )"I'l
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 6 cs,• S" ? 2 Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lgts
Check the appropriate box
Facility without extefior lots (SD"o WUP r. RC}
This facility does not contain any exterior
�! Facility with erterigr lots (RC)
kletlwds to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 1'Is
Affiliation ate Work Completed: ,,,!.J
Address (Agency) r P . Phone No.:
S i;;nature: Dater
AwC -- August 1, 1997 2,

DAu+ d 65-0 /TC r Y%YJ
D). Application and Handling Eguigment -�v;Q�.
Check the appropriate box 1. % ` J
(WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment. specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design `charts and tables.and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing'application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be,maintained,and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
e plan),
w o v v'
Ne . exp�ed. r exls�,- facility without ex�sq ����,�gutnment Isis sora tmgauon. (I)
Animal waste application_ equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover cite area required by die
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Q New, expanded. Ur eXistine fagility lyiLbo)jt existing «
sp v irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate rite waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by cite
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tinting of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). . , ,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please: Print): V 6vnv e—
Affiliation 14 'Date Work Completed:_/
r
Address (Agency): Cr % l 9�. a h AJI%JCPhone No.:�;�cT��-
Signature: XDate: /c2— �7-79
E) Odor ControlJnsect Control,_ Mortality Nlanacement and EmerEenev Action Plan (D._
S 1. WUPP RC or I�
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site'and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can bey knpleniented by this facility,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prin
Affiliati
Address (Agency):
Sig
Work Completed:
No.:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block Is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the Facility wtis built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expandrd
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified'mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farin. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCOS 106.805. A copy of cite notice and a list of die property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of ivlanager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Date:

0
III. Certification of Installation
j� A) Collection, Storage Treatment Installation
w expand d gr retrofitted fa (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet,or exeeed.the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check. the appropriate box
a The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and, the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization,plan.'--
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has commi/tteed/ to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �_!/Lr
Affiliation &R CS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency). Phone No.:
Signature: I Date:
This following signature block is only to be•used when the bok'for conditional approval in IfI. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system a's:specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and•will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the;waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEN.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
A W C -- August 1, 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
//W
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
i in the plan.
For facilities withourexterior.loes, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment (WUP or T)
Check the_ap priate block
I� Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
iJ_ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
leas proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (montli/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affili
Address (Agency
Signature: 20
_Date Work Completed:
Phone No.:21,0— 3Joy1
Date:_./D— 79-0
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and i4tortalityManagement (SD. St. WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Elan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan ha_a;lso been installed and is/operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliatio
Address (
Signature
[etc
No..
AWC -- August 1. 1997 5

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality", ,..
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this farm „along _ with ..the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- August 1, 1"7•

• f ^-,1. GIYf ill •S f L ,, ,1 �, ^_..,' I
AA
cem
Car
Z-ZBonVNVILLE BATTIEGA
/ • �+� ��1 / -Ilk ti rn ,.�� ii {STATE H>ISTOBIG St
Co
Ar—
If
-mil 13t �,)�•J`---� ' � . + � � _ ,1-- �.� `` ��✓' ...tint: �.S � �� , �-.
. _ � — ,,, , - �' • + e .Harper ' I
� � /%' � A�.`" _ iy • .tom � , i .. I-
1 l� �� �•__"' �1+ ` .r, ,tic'. �
lit)04
167
1
1,4
r'
L
{ 1
cam
CP
IfAg
k . • 1�
16Si
h • _ t
i V �- 1 I _ 173S

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919- 571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.919-989-5050
SWCD 919- 989-5381
NRCS 919- 989-5381
This plan will'be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem..
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. Th's plan should be -posted in an accessible
location Kor all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a.
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate.
C.
Stop
all flows to the lagoon
immediately.
d.
Call
a pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:'
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate -agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DwQ
(Division of water Quality) regional office; ?hone
919- - After hours, emergency number: 919-
133-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

r
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-989-,5050. C. Instruct'EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919--089-5380, local SWCD
office phone number 919-989-5381, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: , ip
b. Contractors Address: 8 0 Q
C. Contractors Phone: / - 8- p
b: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: Chris Smith
b . Phone: [phone]
C 0
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ�and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
C16uM1.y8rjwola!M gQCttXNI.dCa
5604 12.96

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
�ellll ll' - Cause JIMPs III CoRS11-111 Insects Sitc Spccific Practices
-- Liquid Systems
111101 CMINI'S Accumulation of solids flf plush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids front
gullers as designed. /
9---�Remove bridging of accumulated solids at o C
diiseharge
Lagoons and fits C111sled Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and (tits where
(test breeding is apparent to minimize the � c e C/
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
a inches aver more than 30% of surface.
l'XCL:S4iVC Vegulative Decaying vegetation _ Maintain vegetative control along banks of �c a e�
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along walees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
I�ccJce� T l:
Spillage rl Design, olwalc and maintain reed systuns (e.g..
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage. . - - /4///V
0 , Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; I5-30 clay interval
_ during winter).
I�CCd SIL)G%C Accumulations of feed rCSIdl1CS .1Zcdncc moisture accumulation within anti
around inuncdiale perimeler of feed siortge
areas by insuring drainage away liom site
and/or providing adequate conluinmcat
covered bin for hrewel's grain :rod similar high
moisnlre grain products).
n htspect rur and remove or break up accumuLncd
solids its filler strips aruuud feed slorage as
needed.
AMIC - Ntivem1wr 11. 1996, Page I

Source
Cause
IZMPs to Control Insects.
Site Specific Practices
Animal I folding Areas
Acciumilatlons of animal wastes 0
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
O
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
unimal holding areas to minimize
accuntulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
NY Manure I lanilling a
Accumulations of animal wastes 0
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 -, I
Spstcros
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winlcr) where manure is loaded for land
N14
application or.disposal.
El
Provide for. adequate drainage around manure
,
stockpiles...
CI
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated '
wastes in filler strips around stockpiles and
-. - -
manure handling areas as needed. -
For inure inlunn:uion contact
the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology; Aoz 7613,-Nortli Carolina State l Inivcrsily,
Raleigh. W. 27695-7613.
AMIC - November It, 1990. l'tage 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
SIM rce Cause B6111's to N11i11ind7a Odor Site SIICCIIIc raclices
Farmstead • Swine production iLY
K V getative or wooded buffers;
�1 coco0iumended 6csf In wilgmilei i 1'1)r,-Lcl ices;
Gdjudgincoit and common sense.
Animal body 5191 faccs Oirly 111.111tile-coveled animals Dry Hours
Fill—, Ilool.- I'SKSIVIled fluols;
&-�Mlftjcrs 'located over skilled Iloom;
Cdcrs at high cod of solid floors;
;1--S-.1,rape manure buildup from floors;,.-.
Underfloor venlilalion fur dty111'g':
hialmle colicc(ioll pits Urine; Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial miclobi'll decomposition .11
Underfloor ventilalion
Ventiliflull exhaust 1-1115
Volatile gases;..
&Y. Fall ninilitellnuce-,
Dust
91<r. FrIcie'al airinovement
111door'sol faces
• Dust
gplyaslidowo betlycell groups orallillials;
9'F d-idditim;
'fCcder covers; &IA
9"'Fecd delivery downspout extenders to feeder /Y/14
Covers
Flush lniikx
Agitatiuti ol'i-ecycidd lagooi - 1
0 Flush 1--tok covers;
Ii(prid ivhilc woks are filling
Cl Extend nii mics to I,car botton, or tanks willi
al ll-sipholl Helps
71711;11 alleys
0 AgilatiLoli during %vasimaler
CR'Uoderllour flush AVith underfloor vcufflaliuri
conveyance
Pit lechalge puilits
- Agiftflion of recycled lagoon
CJ
liquid while pits are 11114ig
Avillk anti-sil)lloll VC1115
I'M statiulls
0 Agilatim dol'i3ig SL11111) Imik
C) Stoup tank covers
lilliiig arid dramlomi
0111side (hill colleclioll Agil-miuri dLlrillg %V.1S1C1V'.11Cr CJ Box covers
of-jurldion boxes colivey'l lice
ANIOC - November 11, 1996, hige 3

SourceCause111%11's to A-Viiimize Odor SlfcSpccilic I'Inclices - -
Gad ol'drainpilics ut 0 Agilatiun during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon cuuveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces 0 Volatile gas culissiulls; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Q' Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agilaliun IR Mirlilnurll surface area-Io-voltulle ratio;
1• illilntill I agitation wllell puln-fling;
Mechanical acralion-,
-- - - - - - - •- ❑ >vcn biological additives ^^ — - ---- "`—
Irrigalit'll sprinklcr I ligh pressure agitation; CTIrrigaw on dry days with little or no wind;
uoi�lcs Wiud drill LAY Minumum recurnmeuded operating pressure;
Bump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump rrotn second-slage lagoon
'
Slorage lank or b,lsm
•
Partial microbial dccomposition;
❑
Bottom or lhidlevei loading;
i
surfilce
•
miaill while fillirl
g f;>
❑
7 ank covers,
%
•
Abilation wiln enl l in,
, •
��a
Basin surface orals ofsolids
❑
Proven biological addilives or oxidants
�YS
Seining basin surface
I'arfial microbial decomposition;
❑
. Extend drainpipe outlets undcmeallt liquid ,
0
Mixing while Filling;
level; ' A'
'0
Agitation when emplying
❑
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
•
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection orsluny/sludges; {
spreader outlets
9
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader nfler tlse;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Ullcovered nlanulc,
Volatile gas calissious while
❑
Soil injection ofslurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation wilhili 48 firs";
surfaces
Cl
Spread fit thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
,. . •
❑17
oven biological additives or oxidants
Ucad animals
T
Carcass decomposition;polier
disposition of carcasses
Dead illlllllid dISIMSVI
0Carcass
decompusifiull
SK
Complete covering of carcasses In burial pits;
Ails
Cl
Proper location/couslnlclion of disposal pits
lncinerafuls
Irlconlplcic colrlbltslian
❑
Secondary stack bunters
AMOC - November I f . 1996, Page If

il
Mortality Management -Methods
(cheek; which method (s) are being implemented
Je' Burial three fe-., beneath the surface of the zrounu �.vitin:n hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 fe" from amp flowing
stream or public bode of Water.
:, Rendzrins at a rendering piant licensed under G.S. 106-IES.7
1�1� Complete incineration f/p3 o»r 6-yIevec/l
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Zi Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

SOIL -- ;�'
�� L •, i,> i
cutkit
,r
1
Det
IJ
•
h
}
loll L
r ,,
f L>1L 9
✓�� % , f ♦ �;
sit
"
��
•
f
4 _::
c /
rsn
•. J � �
,�- .��r�,
NP
AN
s'_
is all 31V1S1 f�iY1L
1`J3 L1LVe TMl
� ! �
�� `�
u/
/J�-^ . r"`'
% l SL,W
4Mr-

State of North. Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
David Herring
PO Box 224
Newton Grove NC, 28366
Dear David Herring:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
Facility Number: 5 I -63
Johnston County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on March 12, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with David Herring in
order to allow additional time for David Herring to obtain and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (I4) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter..
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

6
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at (919).733-5083 ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
RRO Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 51-63
DAVID HERRING
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by David Herring, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21. - _
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a r> -
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 1, 1998. _

Farm Number: 51-63
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. in the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties'according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above. .
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties; or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby.
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 51-63
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For D.G. Herring Swine Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

'State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NIEMORANDUIVI
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
i
4
A17W
�z
�0r
�� 7
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number 3
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
V 1 4 r: Jt�,-Od r6o
.4,+V"`�
s�kre
;MP I"'.w
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

0olf�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORA4ATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant (Owner of the Facility): David G. Herring
2. Facility No.:
51-63
3. Facility Name: D.G. Herring Swine Farm
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
David G. Herring -Owner
5. Mailing Address: PO BOX 9
City: Newton Grove State: N.c. Zip: 28366
Telephone No.: ( g 7 n) 5 94 -
6. County where facility is located: Johnston
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle):
8. Application Date: 3-4-98
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
*NOTE PRIOR 4/10/96 FOR CERTIFICATION
T - 9/23/94 WETLAND DETERMINATION FOR SPRAY FIELD
FORN-1 SPAG V98 Paae 1 of 4
* I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH SCS (NRCS) FOR YEARS WITH MY SWINE FARM.

i
2. Effcu-tS m;.►dc since 1--cliroary 1, 1993 to dcvclop amd inipIcnn•nt a ccriifwd miiiii,il
W,B(C inanarcrnent plan (Usc additinnal shcctS il�ncc�cSNarV). 'ilii" Suint».L['y
include:
A. All contacts madc Nvith technical specialist
13. Datcs and types of plans developed
C. Contracts m"ned
D. 1=ands cxpcndcd
F. Irnprovenients mach to the system
F. Animals removcd and not retoacked at the facility
G. Othcr actions taken
A- 9 -23=94- Prior to this date wetland & bel, higher erodible
land determination made by Kenneth York & Chris Smith
12-0-q5NOLP f CoM rhri Smith on r€ewentsneed ing signature
fnr t�mni ng waste_
1-08_-96 Irrigation information mail to Vern Parker of
Crozet _jrrjgation for plan
4-_1.8_-96 rime Il.i7_L FarMer permission to get information
from NRCS
_9 sf4-96 NRCS day ,1 ope.d-- o_irhar waste utilization plan
10-15-96 Recieved letter from NRCS on need to be certified
12-12-96 Recieved letter from NRCS regarding proposed waste
utilization plan
name in for irrigation design
to Carroll Pierce of DSW
6-_I q- 9-7 _ Conies of waste plan recieved by Scott Jackson
NRCS r-opip-s-of agreements for
_12-16-97 _Metwith NRCS (Smi_th) to set irrigation marls
in lagoon and review irrigation plans. Stop -
Start Pumoinq Markers
FORM SPAG 1198
P,w,c 2 of 4

2. Effons made since Fcbruar - 1, 1993 io dcvc}op and ir7ll,lcmcni a cc , i �::? inli it
WZIStc maria2cmem plan (Use additional sheers if neccssa-v.). This SLJfllI'll :.?'` mu"t
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
E Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
g- 9-.04_96 Waste Utilization Plan Developed
12-12-96 $1
4-08-97 Nortli Carolina Agriculture Cost Share -Plan
Developed -for Coastal on spray field
1-13-98 North Carolina Agriculture Cost Share Plan
19-10 92 TrriCjaLinn Plan dp3zel sped _
1-20-98 11- - — --�-- 11 pending AO approval
from NRCS
_C- - 4-08-97 NCACP- signed For Cost Share Contract
1-13-98 NCACP- signed for Irrigation Contract
--n.- 5-nr, 17 CCnact Al rigcipd $
6-15-97 Land Clearing $ _
FORM SPAG 1/95 Pw_e 'of

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and imp Icrncnt a cc,n!i).":i arzirrtal
�ra�tc mana�,cment plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). Z his surnm'IIj-% Must
include:
A. All contacts made Mth technical specialist
B. Dates and types. of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expendcd
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
E- 6-15-97 Cleared more land for spray fields
5-06-97 Establish Coastal for spray field
F- 124A Animals aLe oD the farms, lagoons are working._
G- *NOTE: I feel like that if certification forms had not
changed, and ptiL more resl.ricLion on the irrigation
_ part OF certiFicaEjan_ T would have been certified
by now_ n,» t.r, the chanraes x have to sprigg a
few more acres of coastal.. I also need to clear
about 212 acres -of land due to irrigation -wetted
T area. This applies to both the E.J. Faison Farm
m& David G. Herring farm. I manage both farms.
FORM SPAG 1/9S

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINI\G CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific (lungs that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each actiyitV
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The ENIC reserves the right to deny an)' proposed schedules that arc
excessively long. (Use additional shcets if necessary).
i )C1?„ar a corner_ of woodland for coastal June 30 1998
Establish approximately B-10 acres o[ coastal. June 30 1998
ACaR & NHC� _
.applicant's Certification:
I. R. attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the E\1C has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required pans of this application are not completed and if all
reauired su porting,information and attachments are not included. this application package will
e returned as incomplete. Furthermore, I attest by my signature that 1 fully understand that if
this facility is found to be ineligible to enter into a special agreement with the EMC nothing in
this dncument removes my responsibility and liability for cornplying with all North Carolina
G:neral Statutes and Regulations. I understand that the failure to meet any dates that UC agreed
.upon by myself and the BIC will result in appropriate enforcement actions beirtc takE-7, by the
EL1C.
Print Name of Owner
Date - o
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1198 Pabe 3 of 4

Rc uired Items:
One (1 ) original and t„vo (2) copies of the completed and appropriately -executed
a7licat_ion-form. along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTLNG
LNFOR_NIATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOIVLNG ADDRESS:
�OhTH CAROLINA DIN'ISION OF tiVATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECT] ON
?SON -DISCHARGE CO'MPLIANCE/E\FOR CE.NIENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
R.aLEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page o; 4

i
U. S. DEPAATMENT OF AGRICULTURE
i01� CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION ASSISTANCE NOTES SCS-CAA-S
•91
L^N0 USER
ADDRESS
ACREAGE
LOCATION OF UNIT
�AVLD R,1IKG ZiZ.
�EMCT-br.1 (a2cVF
3�
©
O'Sya1
c�+l 5Q 1OoB
CURRENT CONSERVATION OBrECTIVES E- r
Ucj
} ..
ate.
e_n-
LIST POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THE SCS CONSERVATIONIST MIGHT CONSICER WITH THE LAND
USER (As objectives change record thorn In the natal
i�SCvS 5 r— QLz gg1 4i 1 1 0
!
?S G ✓��'fTd f: //'C'
OY!/�
!J5! c 1
f
c .�/lrf�
NOTES OF SIGNIFICANT ASSISTANCE PROVIDED. ALTERNATIVE$ CONSIDERED, DECISIONS REACHED. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS OR COMPONENT PRACTICES INSTALLED, AND FOLLOWUP PROVIDED MAY BE RECORDED CHRONOLOGICALLY BELOW AND
ON ADDITIONAL PAGES TO PROVIOC A HISTORY OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES WITH
THE LAND USER. tNCLUDft AND EVALUATION OF SJON11FICANT SOCIAL. CULTURAL. ECONOMIC. AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES.
(Thom Include Consideration of Wetlandk flopd plains. endangered Joecles, arthedlogltal ValUes, prime lands. etc-)
DATE
ASSISTED BY NOTES
(Inittelal
u i � r � � r'� /-1r� 7o d • films,,
�./�
�+ .. U i'�7va. �/f ✓L�/7r.?3^ � s r15S!>C /�- -� Er/ i VG[+� �.
O/7
V(�d py C dam' .J
/L
Z' ":'f -5 i r J y S
1 f v
Li.
r
IQ dl•d l-21G/ !4 J
Ij- g /y'.!/ F - P"r -,,{L.
� n,,"
�'r7 ° =� K . �l� n i �!'�
r� a
1

/f?,c14
/ N2CC���✓�1 ! /1 r f//J
Chi
r
ZZ),
% 1
l/nn C C�vi ti,l3r1 1,wil
%z
/eel 0 1r p q
/ / '77
�'�. �f f^/ri `//)/} y✓ / f C iC'i �� C[c! L.L•'q�I r_ FY�.:r.�r; rjt'„ -.7' 7/��//�
l

Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
c
Telephone:
TABLE 11
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
I'fi
&P-6
U f
Field Specifications '
County:
Dale: Aq
Field
Number'
Approximate
rAaxiurum
Useable Size
of Field3
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate +
(inthr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle4
(inches)
C01tIrnent5
----------r11
,
..
11-able to be completed in its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation systern designer.
'See atlached map provided by the Field Office for field locations).
'Total Iieicl acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Irrirlalion Paramelel5
Ortuber 1995
page-1
I1SDA-NRCS
Norlh Carolina

i1,'l4/97 16 1.3; S10w:i93-n23S Gis OF I,r
'4-J n _
ANIMAL WAS j B U7iL!7-A T iON PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE U i ILIZA71ON ACnEEMEN
Meeded oniv;f adcdiricnai land !!as to be leased etc.)
z
1, J C�1S� r Jr hereby give Z4
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utiiization Systern right up next to
my property line without regards to buffers for the duration of lime shpvvn see?ow,
The property line on which waste can be applied is shown on the attached map.
1 understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phcsphcrus, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied shcuid nct harm my land or crcps. i aiso
understand that the use of waste will reduce my need fUr c :rr-=erciai fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:%`'1` Date:
Waste Producer: Cate:
l
Technical Representative: u, v cci$: I/ - Iy—
SWCD Representative: Date:
i
Term cf Agreement. N�_'1. to
(Xizsauzn C eTer_ Yea= sc S;lasad =e ns,
_ (See Reau1`ed Spec JFC ;
i
i /Vol;C
-fl

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
.�hereby
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System right up next to
my property line without regards to buffers for the duration of time _shown _below,
The property line on which waste can be applied is shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also
understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Lando wner:���.��w�>�1'��. Date:�7
Waste Producer: Date:
r
Technical Representative: �t;i ��' � Date: A c A
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement:_ //- 20-e , 19 57 to /I - 20=2612 z
(Minimum cf Ten Years on Cost Shared 7:ens)
(See Reauired Specification No. 2.1
'Notary

e, 51
Notla x NOf�Lfr�YG:C'J(;ffi1�,�EtiE`>i�'ti�'.; �``� tz:µr c •�,,�,� ..1,{r w, :�sa.r, .. F
mom
t ,., � ,� „Otft,' ':QP�-•CQF1t�L•'%�� ��ti'�-'---.;s.�^,�_�;-.-M1�3',�-.�. �^ai .,' _ _ �,�sw-.r•+sue '
'.:.' +rv.. „ �i:.,.+•iw's[�ia�ii1`'_4"Y,a.:yi,i_✓''?F.: .. =: �:, _tLtisrx r-�-ah .` ;�
. ,• }4y ,; �TFrE!E�r`i GE�^TE"fnT,t�tF,r�a v
- -{r•t-
-, �',a-�y'a r r�a���r�..x,�: r�rr+l, �c rye•,.
�:s z h£EfF�Rl� sroa roGme fY�
�liRt�,rto a1x Tohnstorm C..uRt�n;rt Eau! Qara�es''az _the fz rs ��
•tF fc - t^^ C -.- e a *,� _ ,. t. '� -:��- r ::i`� = l,.va r f
sdnd�sameCTret� he a=rr a .es crsr„ arrd4ffR�E G' ftEtZRFti� o� �arpsort� {
Caun`✓�
or, rhra ra 1 z Rz pax f a the s2 nd" past arr sansemiines etre.et t ereirz �� fi,
1• - 'ate. �essza""' Y� - ..- -. .. - ���� - ., -
do here EkH. TP-M nd:�'.Tease-ta: sa+ia: I sse_ ar,&'ham �es�e�dae� he_eE�.acce r as renaraC li
- - - .
:ems: -� i
a-G': su.FG`_ Ccc urn a.Ll. c.eareci�� Tana. Tac_rasnGa'3' � cac ca:r �: Q r psi �� mac$ Ci �'cLEw TLb'• {jjF+ia
yIn
-. Marc aY11.MYhown;11L',•.-Jbhnatanm':CoUnCy,...iiGFifLCar'u'1-Tfim-ffSQre, o&MWir ry dje sarf fie
am 7
7E _ilSZ,-_6 _acres,.. more: or Tess. a' snow a:r a.,TaP therac�. en to aR Q= j jFLLCJ@!' €�
or'the- �_ G'_ Adams and Sai ties L'_ nazlr�.�e:r-�Yrapes�c (R�ynar =.rcr ,'" pre aFe t'r• €f
darriccEngtneer;na, 5ur.r.evtn¢„ Q_ A_,..4ared.!N.?rrT: 4G, T4�G`_r, 'r.2ccrded:, ape
Soak 2Z ac Page MA AChi: 10[TRS.CCi�'IJLr.t:-'.�o-5i:t~r'Y s�:c..rac-�_�rc^.i�ccrper--e�: F�
herato and, byr re:'erenc- made a: pace hereef_ 4
-.,_ _a ms: and. ,s ,�_sz ire s i i'c'Ns_
can.. �,,r .._--.ze
-.�- Du: , iC_ F:;2: _1 rs c
annual , _nca-1' ar- r6E_]Q c=_ �c_- ar- a•11 lra,r_w
:ne, annual . _n=_. saxi i .tw M{ Ces-
aC. =e,=._ir`---Ye' (=i'!ear. C2!':fL, l=__'u =er—acres-
:e. e, -y s .saw raG_O0: ;er'acr_ for Hi- -._____ lance iaca_a'__ccc.saic p _.aa2gayaaT`
annual.v. i .sarrar.c -
a _ • � ^;:�_. � yr acr " .. i
:na = ,ti,inw Gv:rC�.'a nnC Cne• rrQ:1.1=. C:. LL°H' ii�'rTO.^.L,2w. w_ ...:�" :xw`,arLlmdL:`• i !I
Wave 11,17ga oaer3t:iarr.rY`_
_ ";40-_�.aite� iy.k.i�' �'irrl�?Ot;J1�'i'in -iiC ..'i--!-C `•'.r'==C.;- ;� _.`.�'KasC•."�fT@"a'�" ._-• ��
a.
_... . _r.-1e._c�.- ,�•,r�.� ...,�u anc, r�gu.iat;.,a_ _ - i
7ner :am,
Orlin in=
Ciro, •aS•.iZi6yS,Aitfi7;!7reg2 ` c•:�f'�i�-: .. .4t:'r:•.•.. :�....�_-

SPIN_a 3ER
nay. s ' an vsx �°��ir rr"n f:'- =Y�.= r �_it;: aT 3T :; Rand~ Raad`� Ra 3TL:fatr' Ho�tYn EaFaii�in x? `-.
{. y r.
F F., yq,si' �m r 7 . tpdCl"Te QZ tl T1CS pd^� aT3� salter ReS FeTe'Let C� hQreire.a* SStlGS�' di1d . T.
.r r �1 �i .� +..y�q+�y,r _ r = - ,: L - -�+. tf ,.,�+'rv_.o-p.. +Y>ya `n..C-
- �r c� '� �- -+ '�'<d"`•=� i �.,.;,�,,�„ yJ,;, u � 4 - C � , - T Ji,'�.'�`'�._
�R�FE� Cx F�E4RINC aF. _ampstlrr. Ccunt�„ YQrth dal TSLTR¢ party QT ythe seton4 an
c i 5Qrnet" meheraTn,� 3--
-'�a�
�- i• f h� S(1r3Je 't" t''e: S;,an& CCRC:ia: OTT{ he eTRai e SeY �ortFr„;the Ca55Qr ,
-
F.
.- ,;e �� >.-, ,F da: herec+F: 1e* arcc ie�•�e*t�. safcc C r�zd�an�%he:.C6csee dees--.he ao,a-ac[eat�a�tesar•�- -
oz-said:Lassurs;,a. i_ cTE_red:'Tan& taeatec :uporkt:rat: paece%' r al_:ec"at�5.tuaterTr'
...: _ _
8'entnRJ r. I Te•. l o'Hns 1onnscor:- Ccurrry-„. YQFth C� c-1_rn a more=ihe-
- as fbT-.Tc4s
6E:NC- 50acres_ morn- or Ha-- Three— iraC`t-Qhe:'":.ire t::e
Revorc of Cammiss:oRer.s aouaiaract ta: &-rv.Td&'tt e- Tand . of uarreT W—Jer.riaam:- aecease�..
cc recard:-fm Fria- ca' E T% im thff cri=�ce• of they Creric-of Suaer or' Ccur= oi-JTohRstar;.
Caun.cr,- 'Tcr. * said- rspr= heina. incarocrated hera=rr_ an&br- radar
a_ cares nersc-- -
Tnc 'erigS 3nC: C�RCI C:CRS.Gr :RiS k235� ara- if iC rlo• s.:
i_ TG^.M: if1'i: Tease sha-'i. T. 02^_.lr as- 0i uaruarr T,- IC[.i anC: sra:lT end:,. un ie5:
5cane� terriina-ec, .:s here -- arcv.id-eT orr. dece=er 1, EJflE_.
:-e: r= ffva' (01 %e3r= o C'& I esze"• sna-1 L
ta. t-e: Lessor- ar, dnnua:T rerit,'.1. oT' 560_00 Oe" aCre` 7r -.a.l 1 C::eara7'IanG TCcated:-
u�OrT- Said.=pCe.^LIScS_ _a.i .renca:i t0: 6 pa:i d: arrnrla f;/ 1R aQ'faRC Co�-L,5,—
GurinC:t:E--5acond;:f1ve-(-)•:/eav-te:maf t:ir-Teases-;. t::e anruai: rerta.l�•'S�T?1L
_nE:CtT pe -.ac-e on c:eare, 2ar.(-- r_ccste; upert sale pre--risea pavamTe-annua;TTr'f-=
...- PC�RPOSr- n�i l.'CC_ Trri�..1e=tee iS_ arantaacr'C:C: .".45es<w 1RCii:C:T.i .
r`:e Cromir:G' a-. C. -5: --nr-'the•.- r.:C.^.e_ `' : LLs&-SZIC.' Yr?^riSeS- i Cr-arturta.
�T..
'daSt._.a.7nc Tit-'::e:cCe �t:cr.-.Cr;_[2•OTne'r1C:ai
- Cfl.1PCr IGE .y �Tni E;d'ILRQi1ME:lT.3C L�iic�' IrL the ;preacir:c or: t.^a Hascz' here rr : -
Cc aCa!Rclata0_ ^e- �_._:ae- saxi I _ a= a-.: iriYre � _tTiG:'! 'tbl�^.'a'., ICC�I- C �L� dnC:'�Z^E -:
:.- IS7:::iiME.{7
Oiir :-�'I'/.
er
u� -- - .=.in:orr VOrc^'Cara�irT�Z�?Z,_.

ates Soil
nt of Conservation
•e Service
806 North Street
Smithfield, NC 27577
S� a3, brag
Tract rr ! ) r7 (o0
Dear
In compliance with the provisions of the Food Security Act
of 1985 and the Food Agriculture Conservation and Trade Act
of 1990, I am enclosing a copy of the Highly Erodible Land
and Wetland Conservation Determination Work Sheet (SCS-CPA-
026) and a photo copy of your farmland. Determinations have
been made on this tract as you requested.
Fields listed in item 6 or item 9 on Form SCS-CPA-026, and
shown on the enclosed map, have been classified as highly
erodible under the current definition.
Fields listed under 12 of Form SCS-CPA-026 and marked "W"
are considered wetlands. You may lose all USDA program
benefits if you clear or drain these areas.
Potential wetlands are marked "PW" on the attached
photograph. Soils in these areas are not normally wetland
soils, but could have some small areas of wetland contained
within them. You should contact SCS for an onsite check
before clearing these areas.
If you do not agree with this determination, you may request
a redetermination within 15 days of the date of this letter.
Your request must be made in writing and should state the
reason for the request for reconsideration. Requests are to
be made to the above address.
If you have any questions, you may call this office at
[phone].
Yours truly,
� J r
Xt/
Kenneth C. York
District Conservationist
O The SoJ rcnservat+on Service
is an agency of the
l)eoarlmenl of AgriCullure

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 1 of 1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Mar 02, 1998
JOHNSTON (SMITHFIELD) FIELD OFFICE [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes
Client Name: FAISON, F.J. JR.
Business Name: FAISON, F.J. JR.
Business ID: FAISFJ
Client Address
------------------------------
104 FOX LAKE DRIVE
CLINTON, NC
28328-3106
Client Phone Ext Description
-------------- ------ --------------
Business Address
------------------------------
104 FOX LAKE DRIVE
CLINTON, NC
28328-3106
Business Phone Ext Description
-------------- --------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JRM
Fund ID: FSA Date: 04/18/96
Note:
William Farmer came in today to get a copy of David Herring's waste
management plan. He is the private consultant hired by Mr. Herring. He
did not have a written request but told me that Mr. Herring had given his
ok. I gave him a copy.

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Resources
512 Noah Salisbury Screec • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Jacks G. ,Aarnn, Governor July 25, 1989 Stephen G. Conrad
WAliam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mz . David Herring
P. U. Box 498
Newton Grove, NC 28366
RE: Approval to Impound
David Herring Lagoon
Johnston Counter
Dear !'_ . H Drr i rc
This concerns the subject dam you recently constructed in Johnston CouAy
pursuant to approval for construction on March 6, 1989 as rec;uired by the Dar,
Safety Law of 1967.
"As -Built" plans and specifications and the engineer's certification were
received. on July 5, 1989. The dam was certified by the G.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service.
A final inspection of this dam was made by the Lau -id Quality staff of the
F leigh Regional office on July 19, 1989. The dam was found to :r; in canpliauice
with approved plans and specifications and you may impound water.
Enclosed for your use is a Dam Operation Maintenance aitd Inspention Manual
which contains information on the maintenance of dains for safe c:Qration wYG
-••� ^ems?. ,res for =rL=�rr-p.lcy situations.T r sta f = i Pal
v_.�: t. v.. ..._ _ � � .�� `�'� Land Quality �.c.__ will .. .e
periodic inspections of this Jdam to assure that the dam is being-zintained i.
Gccd operating ccndition.
Very truly yours,
Stephen G . COi r =.d
SIC:
vclosure
CC: .. John Holley, P.E.
Py. - Harry Gibson
NEC. William i . pia i re l
cN . Donald Griff i
Mr. Picharc Toler
Al [-.'J.1: l_ _. r-,l:, l nA m r ma':%'C A,::•,-, i--1:l0•..

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary March 6, 1989 Director
Mr. David Herrincr
P. O. Box 498
Newton Grove, NC 28366
RE: Approval to Construct
David Herring Lagoon
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Herring:
This is in response to your submission received on Februan, 16, 1989 of
plans and desicrn data for the subject proposed lagoon in Johnston County in
compliance with the Dam Safety Law of 1967. These plans have been reviewed by
concerned State agencies and their comments have been received. These plans
have been prepared under the supervision of the USDA Soil Conservation Ser77ice.
This letter constitutes approval of your proposal to construct the subject
lagoon according to the plans submitted to this Division on February 16, 1999
with the following stipulations:
(1) Project construction shall be supervised by the USDA S042. Conservation
Service.
(2) During ccnstructiori the Division of Laru,. Resources I:^''� raqaire _u,cl-
progress reports as is deemed necessary,
(3) Upon completion of the project, the USDA Scil Conservation Service
shall inspect the completed work and upon finding (1) that the 4,rork
has been done as specified, and (2) that the lagoon is safe shall file
with the Division of Land Resources "As -wilt" drawings and a
certificate stating that the work has been crTnpletec: in accordance
with approved plans, specifications and other r-----uirements.
(4) No water shall be impounded within the laucor. until after final
approval is issued by the Division of nand Fescurces for %-eration of::
this lagoon.
(5) You must notify Mr. John i-;olley, P.r., La {:rG:lily Sectioi:, 3800
Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27611.
P.O Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 276h-7687 Telephone 914-
An Equal Opportunity Alnrmarive Action Emplover

Mr. David Herring
March 6, 1989
Page 2
(6) A typical section and inverts of the diversion ditch around the
perimeter of the lagoon should be provided on the "As -Built" drawings.
(7) Stone filters or other appropriate sediment and erosion control
measures are recommended to minimize offsite sedimentation.
The Dam Safety Law requires that project construction commence within one
year from the date of this approval letter, or the approval is void.
Very truly yours,
Stephen G. Conrad
SGC:se
cc: Mr.
John Holley, P.E.
Mr.
Harry Gibson
Mr.
Donald Griffin
Mr.
Richard Toler_

USDA, .' NATURAL RESOURCES 806-NORTH STREET
�— CONSERVATION: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-9998
SERVICE'TELEPHONE [phone]
October 15, 1996
Dear Swine Producers:
Time is drawing near for you to complete the process of getting your operation certified
with the State. We only have from now until December 31, 1997,
I know a lot of you have land that needs to be cleared and sprigged to coastal for the
purpose of waste application as required by your waste utilization plans. There is only one
more shot at getting this done by December 31, 1997. The seeding dates for coastal are
March I through April 15. Time will be here before you know it.
There are also those of you that have repair work or retrofits that must be made on your
waste holding facility or lagoons. We must get this work completed as well.
We have written some of you letters listing items that you need to complete to get your
operation certified. Please don't put it off. There is one major change concerning
irrigation that most of you will be required to complete. If you have any questions. please
give me a call at 919-989-5381.
Chris W. Smith
Soil Conservation Technician

NATURAL RESOURCES
,Use 806 NORTH STREET
�-; CONSERVATION SMITHFIEf*D-.NC :2 .57Z 9998:
... ,.: .
SER1ElCE TELEPHONE g 19 989 538'i
October 15, 1996
Dear Swine Producers:
Time is drawing near for you to complete the process of getting your operation certified
with the State. We only have from now until December 31, 1997.
1 know a lot of you have land that needs to be cleared and sprigged to coastal for the
purpose of waste application as required by your waste utilization plans. There is only one
more shot at getting this done by December 31, 1997. The seeding dates for coastal are
March 1 through April 15. Time will be here before you know it.
There are also those of you that have repair work or retrofits that must be made on your
waste holding facility or lagoons. We must get this work completed as well.
We have written some of you letters listing items that you need to complete to get your
operation certified. Please don't put it off. There is one major change concerning
irrigation that most of you will be required to complete. If you have any questions, please
give me a call at 919-989-5381.
Chris W. Smith
Soil Conservation Technician

UMA"NATURAL RESOURCES $06 NQRTH .STREET
CONSERVATION SMITHFIE€.l7 NC 27577 9998
SERVICE TELEPHONE [phone]:381
December 12, 1996
David G. Herring
P O Box 224
Newton Grove, NC 28366
Dear David:
Enclosed is a copy of a proposed waste utilization plan for
both your farm and the Faison farm. It requires unnumbered
field #2 to be cleared (UN2) approximately 8.5 acres. You
need to get this cleared so you can establish it to coastal
this Spring with the rest of the fields. The other fields
that you have rented (Jeff Adams farm) will qualify for cost -
share, but not the land you have to clear. It is possible
that we can overseed the fields and go with grazing rather
than all hayland. When our computer program is up and
running, I will run this system through the computer and see
if it will work. I think it looks good. The deadline is only
one year away for us having all this up and running. We need
to get on it. Please call me at 919-989-5381 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely, 7
�L-
� y, fi�,..
Chris W. Smith
Soil Conservation Technician
enclosure

........ . . .
NATUa ALRESOURCES.' NdRTH' -REET7:".-.::.
........ ...
77
.....9998
TELEPHONE9T9989
June 19, 1997
Mr. Scott Jackson
GIS
P 0 Box 224
Newton Grove, NC 28366
Enclosed are two different waste utilization plans for both
farms for David G. Herring. Please review these plans and let
me know which one you would like to go with. Also enclosed is
certification that needs to be signed by the irrigation
person. we can sign all of the certification with the
exception of that part (the irrigation part).
once you decide which plan you would like to use, I will need
to input the data into the computer and generate a new copy.
our new computer program is a little different. After we
generate.this new copy, we all will then need to sign.
This does not include the new farm that was started. Agriment
Services was doing this.
Sincerely,
Cam- C�I..SructGL�,
Chris W. Smith
Soil Conservation Technician
enclosures

X SDA NATURAL. RESOURCES. 806. NORTH STREET'
CONSERVATION: SMITHFIELD�,.NC` 275779998'
SERVICE TELEPHONE 9.19=989=5'38
May 7, 1997
Carroll Pierce
P O Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27687
Dear Carroll:
Enclosed is a list of people that need irrigation designs. Also enclosed is a copy of their
waste utilization plans, minus tax map. Due to the size of the maps and the cost of mailing
them, we decided to keep them on file here in the office. If you have further questions,
please contact us.
Sincerely,
j,*
Chris W . Smith
Soil Conservation Technician
enclosures

8) Glenn Turnage
4761 NC 50 S
Benson, NC 27504
Phone: [phone]
Malcolm Glenn Turnage Farm /
9) Joseph J. Woodard
854 Woodards Dairy Rd,
Kenly, NC 27542
Phone: [phone]
10) Lenard/Timmy Hudson
3906 Woods Crossroads Rd.
Benson, NC 27504
Phone: [phone]
Lenard & Timmy Hudson Farm
11) David Herring � , ked
P0Box 224
Newton Grove, NC 28366
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
12) BiIly Parrish
1684 Jack Road
Clayton, NC 27520
Phone: [phone]
)C rA
n �
15OPri1A� Ut1�n�YlLs
0

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
September 4, 1996
PRODUCER: DAVID G. HERRING
LOCATION: P.O.BOX 224
NEWTON GROVE NC 28366
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Combination Swine Farm
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 3624 swine design capacity
PAGE
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specifies
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitratior
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

j
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David Herring
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 224
Newton Grove NC 28366
Dear David Herring:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
February 11, 1998
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
Facility Number: 51-63
Johnston County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997,
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O- Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Forst RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please -submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
01
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
�f
14CDENFZ
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMeNT OP
ENVIRONMENT ANo NISIJRA4 ResouRcEs
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 29, 1997
Mr. Scott Jackson
D.G. Herring Swine,Company
PO Box 224
Newton Grove, North Carolina 28366
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-63
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
On October 15, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal -waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility,to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions- regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincere���
dy Garrett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% pdst-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
997
David Herring
D.G. Herring S
PO Box 224
Newton Grove
e��
EDF.=HNF;Z
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
Facility Number 51--63
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Herring:
You were notified, by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely, y�
'Xt
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N�� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 1Tk post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt-, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
David Herring
D.G. Herring Swine Farm
PO Box 224
Newton Grove NC 28366
SUBJECT: Operator in Charge Designation
Facility: D.G. Herring Swine Farm
Facility ID#: 51-63
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Herring:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincere ,
}
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 14
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 500k recycled/100/. post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A&1P15%
441129
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 9, 1995
Mr. D. G. Herring
D. G. Herring Swine
P. O. Sox 224
Newton Grove, North Carolina 28366
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
SR 1002
Facility No. 51--63
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Herring:
on October 10, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection
is part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
animal waste disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was
not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In addition, no manmade
pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) were observed. As a result, your facility was found to
be in compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management
is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural
resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of
a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you
are required to have an approved animal waste management plan by December 1997.
This plan must be certified by a designate technical specialist or a
professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Buster Towell at
[phone].
Sincerely,
. Aunt(
J y E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett -Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
3800 Barren Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 109E post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
_512 North Salisbury Street + Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James C. Martin, Governor July 25, 1989 Stephen G. Conrad
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secrerary Director
Mr. David Herring
P. O. Pay: 498
Newton Grove, NC 28366
RE: Approval to Impound
David Herring Lagoon
7oh:iwton Countif
Dec _\,_­ . Herring.
This concerns the subject dam you recently constructed in Johnston County
pursuant to approval for construction on March 6, 1989 as required by the Dam
Safety Law of 1967.
"As -Built" plans and specifications and the engineer's certification were
.received. on July 5, 1989. The dam was certified by the U.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service.
A final inspection of this dam was made by the Land Quality staff of the
Raleigh Regional office on July 1.9, 1989. The dam was found to be. in cr;:piia�ce
with approved plans and specifications and you may impound water.
Enclosed for your use is a Dam Operation Maintenance and Inspection Manual
which contains information on the Maintenance of dams for safe oceratwon and
also procedures for ?,rrer;rencv situations. The Land Quality staff will Aral
periodic inspections of this dam to assure that the dam is being Tzintaired inn
good o}x-_ w ati.ng condition.
Very truly yours,
Stephen G. Conrad
SGC-se
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mx. Harry Gibson
i,ir, William J. Harrell
Yx. Donald Griffin
Mr. Richard Toler
PO PU\ ?76L:.' kjlei�fi .\„^^. Carolina 2?ri'il.',��7 Teleph,,r
An Equal Oppt',runn- Am'rM3 TV� AC: ,^ EMP;0%Tr

David G. Herring Lagoon & Holding Pond
P. 0. Box 498
Newton Grove, North Carolina 28366
Certification:
I certify that I have made, or caused to be made, a final inspection of this
pond project and that all work related thereto has been completed in accordance
with these plans and with all other applicable specifications except as listed
on the attached sheet.
(Check here if no exceptions)
Signed Title �z Date

00 -CLYL-d-'. 0 io.d-
--�-•---__._..._ .-..__�n.h,'js.fey�.._CrQ.�_�� �._!.�!or-�h ..C.c?i�r_ ��`.Cti.-_. � _
0 CAT) b
b. E3�-98
i x2-'a 3
Phone J9q - Oaql
M-1 I e
;j 15 0 .Y
4:�.-5 rc es el.1
Iva
10
/S t
-�- �) — j -f-- . v , ) -

LAGOON
Aistance f rom nearest residence —
Soils ,� �-,'�f , _ - dumber of Animal Units or Total lbs. 4G� )CJiss
Type Lagoonf,+aernc�r _ -_ Kind of. animas SliJinp—/�rnrs� on)y -
Volume ypt)n 0 Units X ! ft. a !/ f:000 cu. yda.
27 ySp ou-�Si�e WQ �!=
FOLDING VOLUME (waste + rain + 25-year storm)k�1r `a9oo� �'^ 1� ev�CY�n•�
Period J�jr,or S Watershed, f gW - acresk0} /oTa.1 4Olft,mrs �e�ooti ? ilc��
Wa9te�f cu. yds., rain 2 7, cu. yds.
25-yr. Storm
Total 7 cu. yds. pa5,' '
-AND.DISPOSAL c 0 total acres
Cer1aT,�G:�
y
tM ,, nAS1e „�i rl�v• n Art r1 'Y n felY+rnA "5 rCP.�C� -7`�'
., •:.-,l �n • n l k !' A ! `1 1 n K n * a n± . e '7 r %/1 :, ai A in r. Ai•
FERTILIZATION & SEEDING acres
Lime Ferti zer
Seed sc' Mulch_=-!5!o os B la/a r sS ,y
f 310
Length Width 200r. Top Width !d7 rrl
CL--- Top of fill ------- -elev. .S N/-57,'�'1E/Tlf� �VS��°%%sl f)
Top of holding volume - - - - elev. I LC , IovE� t1h�U 1M05h� Z5-%- ,S+6r,-,,
Ton of lagoon volume - - - - Jv: •3Y eIrryyahab ct ��,. _eve -11n1m�m 1eV4
rlra �h � at a �
Bottom of lagoon -- - - - - - elev. 13,152
Emergency spillway - - - - - -elev. 4,s-.0 1 122 6a7; xr I;t(. 30 s7�8 . I opeS- . .
Interior side -slopes
, ' .0 Sj.�t✓ S(opes
J O u..+,.% e_ z 'r.0
I Y
L U
T13./r), EIeV. C.00 -%p W TO ,h old Spu
LUESj Corner p 1
Ca,-'� i.vor� I.gg0On +
a.ri! ri�l 0+3
4-:Z i x
— -�P_ �a.. C.
U. S. DEF kRTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
to SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
M.•.•.:a%...... .. ... T.0.......................... ,
Gr... a ................ ..................=.-,_�
'I SCS ' N.. -313A RE-V 8-75

Anima, astg System-;;-
- a� ?yY''r4
70 f
f j13
it
�( I
f
'F I
Ar-prox, '31* Mile I
Location Ma
7-BM
� ��1.1ousG
E
r goo
t r' er,T , Papa Fie;, ySo (outti�'rnu�rT I +
,y1 y�c Y, r� + j Qalinh, Eiev,gi*C i 76.I
eV 3Qo+ I �5 5s .;;t`L , Aj
3p+7 ps.l' �z-s.l2 '0 452-4
6,t;
l7 i 'Q►'� � � i y
s
' �fJ'iv•rT� � .fl. c12V.��,6
`�n5=. /a3a�rr Inio
Sketch
ss
zs.l
.55
z sq
Zvli10 good s
IY�IEri�, F���s crr,j:flir,'C
_1 Sheet 2 of C'
O r- 7., , , 7
I I 1 /.( r
nc)jhl of rP;L' tirr1R4l11CM�t:�

Producer: !- ' ..� 5 /�sa I .
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on e emb nkment top and
side slopes: kco,
s is
being established on these areas. Beginning n 19W and
each year thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized
with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by -mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least monthly. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following: .
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and overflow Pipes
a. separation of joints
b. cracks or breaks
c. accumulation of salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2. Lagoon surface
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. wet or damp areas on the back slope
d. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of
wave action
e. rodent damage
1

$M"
4. Transfer Pump - recycling and irrigation pumps
a. overall pump operation
b. leaks
C. loose fittings
5. Surface water diversion
a. adequate vegetation
b. diversion capacity
C. ridge berm height
B. Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed fo a
total of ems'/animals (_ 5M to 2AO
The lagoon contains both permanent and temporary storage.
The permanent storage is not to be pumped in order to ensure
that anaerobic action will occur. The design storage
includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes
capacity for the volume of waste produced over 180 days, the
amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event plus an
additional "heavy rain" factor, and rainf},1�.,1, in excess of
evaporation. Your facility is designed ft_180 days of
tempo ry storage; therefore, it will need to be pumped
everyfsix months. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid
level reaches elevation as marked by permanent
markers. St�o,p, pump -out when the fluid level reaches
elevation �lL. Pumping can be started or stopped at any
time between these two elevations for operating convenience
as site conditions permit, such as weather, soils, crop, and
equipment in order to apply waste -without runoff or
leaching.
The attached waste management plan must be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see
Attachment B) before land application. The waste material
should be analyzed before each application cycle to
determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the area of
application should be made annually to insure the waste is
applied as reasonably and practically possible to
recommended rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be precharged with a volume of
water equal to one-half of the treatment volume before
wastes are introduced. Precharging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon
thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
2

w.0
Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush
water and irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below
the surface and as far from the inlet pipes as possible in
order to provide a cleaner effluent for flushing and to
reduce odors when irrigating on land. When these pipes are
placed through the embankment, they should be installed no
more than two feet below top of dike and not in the highest
section of fill. The pipe trench should be compacted with
clay material.
After five years the waste treatment lagoon must be checked
for sludge accumulation annually. If sludge has encroached
into the treatment volume, the sludge must be removed and
applied at agronomic rates based on analysis of the sludge.
Treatment volume must have a minimum of 4 feet of depth free
of sludge at all times.
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) in North Carolina revised water quality regulations
that address animal operations. These rules became
effective on February 1, 1993 (15A NCAC 2H .0200). This
animal operation shall be operated within the requirements
of these rules and regulations.

13�� PVC, SUL 40' PlPEj 3 n / !P.rj7fb
MINIMUM M r u
GEAR NM — 12" •
2 x8 PRESsu
TREA-mb
3'
spa t be g� jua n ire+
MINIMUrA D1AMEM
PREsSuRE -rREA Mb
Fo R flsrE
6' MAN
MAXIMUM

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
AND/OR HOLDING PONDS
Clearing: All trees and brush shall be removed from the
construction area before any excavation or fill is started.
Stumps shall be removed within the area of the foundation of
the embankment and all excavated areas. Satisfactory
disposition will be made of all debris.
Construction; Construction will consist of excavation to
the neat lines and grades as planned. In areas of the
lagoon bottom and side slopes where sandy material is
encountered, the area shall be overexcavated by I foot and
backfilled with clayey material. Excavation shall be by
pan, dragline and/or backhoe. A bulldozer or other
equipment will be used to dress the slopes. Fill material
placed in the embankment shall be free of sod; roots, stones
over 6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable
materials. The fill material shall be placed and spread
over the entire fill area in layers not to exceed 8 inches
in thickness. Construction of the fill shall be undertaken
only at such times that the moisture content of the fill
material will permit a reasonable degree of compaction.
Compaction of all fill material shall be accomplished with a
sheep —foot roller or heavy rubber tired equipment (such as a
loaded pan) passing several times over the entire surface of
each B inch lift. To protect against leakage, the entire
lagoon bottom and all excavated side slopes shall be
compacted in the same manner as the fill material
compaction.
Vegetation: All exposed embankment and emergency spillway
areas shall be seeded to the planned type of vegetation
immediately following construction.

GENERAL
These specifications are to be made a part of detailed engineering plans of the pro-
posed embankment, spillway(s), and reservoir.
No changes nor deviations from these plans and specifications shall be allowed without a
written amendment, in advance of change, from,the responsible technician of the Soil Conser-
vation Service.
All facilities for impounding water shall comply strictly with all state and local laws
regulating such activity.
The Soil Conservation Service =ken no warranty, expressed or implied, of the impoundinv
structure or the water holding ability of the structure.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF:
A. Landowners:
The landowner will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications
to determine that the completed structure will fulfill his present and future needs. Inspection
during construction will be the responsibility of the landowner.
He may request inspection by SCS employees during construction and upon completion of work.
where benefits are to be received from Government agencies, or when the dam falls under the
Dam Safety Law of 1967, inspection and approval by SCS employees are mandatory.
B. Contractors:
The contractor will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications,
conditions at. the site that may affect his schedule of operation, and the location and meaning
of all stakes on the site. Failure to do so will not relieve him of the difficulties and cost
pursuant to satisfactorily completing the work-in compliance with these plans and specifications
and any written or verbal contract with the landowner. All bench marks, grade, and line stakes
will be left undisturbed and protected by the contractor to facilitate construction and in-
spection.
The contractor, weather permitting, will schedule his work so that he will start on the
agreed date and work will be a continuous operation until satisfactorily completed. All
damages occurring to completed work or materials, by the elements or otherwise, during con-
struction, will be the responsibility of the contractor. Partial or damaged work and/or re-
placed materials damaged from any cause will be paid for by the contractor. Absence of in-
spections during construction will not relieve the contractor from completing the work in
strict compliance with these plans and specifications.
Upon completion of the work, before -moving his equipment, the contractor will request a
final inspection by the landowner and an employee of the SCS. The contractor will then receive
approval that all work has been completed satisfactorily and/or he may complete those items that
vary from the plans and specifications in order that -a final inspection will result in approval.
C. U. S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service:
The United States and its employees are in no manner a party to any verbal or written
contract between the landowner and the contractor. SCS employees, within limit of personnel
available, will inspect and advise on techniques during construction to assure satisfactory
compliance with the plans and specifications.
SCS employees will, upon reasonable notice, conduct a final inspection for strict compli-
ance with all plans and specifications concerning this structure. Inspection will determine
the satisfactory completion of work so that (a) approval may be given for the eligibility of
the landowner to receive benefits from any Government agency concerned with this structure,
(b) final payment may be made to the contractor, and (c) the pool may be filled under the
provisions of the Dam Safety Law of 1967.
-2-

U.. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAIS
Landowner Lji Prr County :—LJIIILI 011
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam 13 Ft. Length of Flood Pool 300 Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation /--.q-81L
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est. Elevation
:
Kind of
:Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width: Slope: Land Use
Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft.
1Fool :
Ft.
2-5�
t. Ft.
;pooh •
2 : --
�OD��' j ln��o.�s , _�
N °n -I ...
`
500��
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach CL.r7 rr0 f InSS
Hazard Classification of Dam 0 b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) Q,
Dam Classification 0 II, III, IV, V)
By
name) (title
Concurred By.
ame � 44� titCle
1
MOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date —
Date I`J�-i -g
2 f 2- f 99

SC S• ENG-518
SOIL INVESTIGATION
U,:S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY, OF PROPOSED POND SITE
ism
WATERSHEI; AREA MEASUREMEM Lagoon Class
s�
- - •.
SKETCH OF •••. •• • SHOWING WHERE BORINGS
,• .r
. 1r r • a
■■�
■err■e■rr■re
■■■
MENNEN■■
■r
.
r■i
■r■
■
a■■■=■■■
ri■�
■
■
r■��n
■■rear
�■■■■■
�■■�e
wamm
■■e■
■■■■■■■■
BORING
Waiirewid 1;;t dam -site and spit1wail bon"vi; first - Men panded area and burmwpfe 6,0rings - separate wjM v,,"cajd line
�
i©IL3
11�lffwlu—q
Iml
ill�Imit�iL�l�l®ICI®
�
�
�
�
IQ�IQ���371■I■r4■I■I�I■i■1■1■I■1r1■frl■leie
�I�I�]1�7l�1I�1
I
�■i■Iri■I■I■I■■I■I
I■I■1■I■l■
mlQ�l�l
I
I�rl■�■1■1■1r1
i■1�IMI■!■■■
��Iml�
�Erl■;■!■I■4■S■Irl■�I■j■i
i
f
I
rli
�t��m��f�l©��■�■si®I■�
f■[�■�■�■1■lar
■fir
r .
� - IC�IC�I®IQ�i,C�f!■I■'■i®i®f�f
0I�!■I■I■f■i■I�■1■�■
. :
m�
�mfm�m
�■��r:rirMl■►fef®Ir�f■�■��■1�■I■1■�I■�>■�■
.ml¢limimimi
�■l■f■i■�■�l■l■�■ief■�e�■f■I■r�■■
• �
Chi®IQ�lml®!
1■I■'
!■I■f
■1■�■I■I■I
I
1
1
1
� . � • .
"
®i®IQ�iit�l■I■`.
�rl■I■1■.■l�f■I■I
I■I■i■1■I
CI SrAin
SIGNATURE & TITLE
s•�r

�l�rr�.•.. JJI 'Y6(41Cf e}r 1: /1'!e �e r` 0
itnCJ / l°r� /✓
OtcO l7ou5e5
Ya
� 1
q+9 17
r�TJ
:ic
.:•o -
ry

wj
D
x 3 D
U�4
o 0 cr a ).5
T-c ---4, J7
ro
��P4-c
Cldj��

Y(,2
Z-
k-w
d_ -may �g5 --.
1104

L(i-'4R w 2/ 11 2 0
u p
_ -r,
u u.�aoL�r� � �n��[U- ���� N Sal G95 ®SS��-.��.f�,�-��. i•�SCG., �..
f %r f
M
r'77
-- — 0 7 -- s.
_.< o
7t u>ii
iTTso� -
—7 10 ,, W/l, r/o., -9190.