510046_PERMIT FILE_20171231

rype of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason r Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Wollow-up 0 Referral 9 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: iq 1$� Arrival Time: y Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: NA _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
1 !J '
Facility Contact: t Title:
Onsite Representative: �' IhS�l� CSul Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
, ,
R
Design
l lIR4
Current
I INllt llll
Design Current
TO
city
Design
Current
apr
acity
Pop.
Wet; Poultry
Cap
Pop.
Cattlera
neaf
uda�
,
Finish
La er
Dai Caw
Feeder
rVFeeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Finish
€
Dai Heifer
Wean
Desi' n
Current,
D Cow
Feeder
p . 1'oult ,'�
Ga aei ,
. Pop.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
�uwwwµy.µ��µ�y,yayys€itlswmyafwu€sµu4wFiWNnl�s�+�uµ
MMM�fpllYxi�€'MslvenwsguHss�4nN3
,[t€cusnupyMuryygg{psMtAlw¢flE£
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[—]Yes `0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
❑NE
[]Yes
RNo
- ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilily [Number: I Date of Ins ection: cr I!q
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ® Yes
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): l ��
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑No ❑NA El NE
EgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Ca No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
J�g NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
�Er NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Hcavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
.IR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
JR] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
g NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes []No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA E"NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ONE
® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

' Facil]1Kummer: l _410 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2 NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
25. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CRNE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
[:]Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
tg No
0 NA
❑ NE
-F{eeb04 evjju f,9, af4ff 4vrri � o,#Xe. Se�r.ei �h�1�f � Q,. Layer, ©�Jh_jWe
q. ergl t ov3j
L� 1 00wel) In cw &/t n ow strucfdgl
L c> a � �- [. 1 r
�60ard_. rne- war-f-rc�s�'c�rc� 0Vefo�� n)j-Pear layaa, a o � r
ib_g ©n hY 0/ r dd es
rail g6 0,d( gh -i"oloYP adMetl*
D1 _ � �fPn�r�r C IfJ�td 04'- h C� th �Ytoo]vecorl
�� 1a yoa, ► �
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �(L_ &l n-e ('e
Phone: 17Q 7Q'—q 0 I
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: S ) Q a
U If
21412015

Divi§ion of Wateii ter`c
'sacility Number L� !- y'� Dlislon o4fj4nd W onservatiau
®,�t7th�Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: Q County: Region:�
Farm Name: St4Y 1 e. Por Owner Email:
Owner Name: W i S'f i
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Physical Address:
kk , PQirc
Facility Contact:
I h4ey
skoh,
so) Title: � �-ef Phone:
Onsite Representati
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Currentesign
�l�il
Current
i`
1#1?IIII il6polli
esign Current
Pop.
Swine j
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity Pap.
Cattle y
Capacity
iFf�.liiflattR
$$ lBtltlAlfFl�p
tbN.�ltlffifit[Ga uri
I�ISWII' i
i .Wisa3idiltlills
PIV4A€€€iE
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Daia Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D 1?ouft
.
Cad aci
Po P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Nan -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
TurkeyPoults
Oth=1
er
I
I�ry3kkS
10ther
J Is4[PEfYqlu€3Pd#d.DIMNrilttp€(&(33�3'�x»ii�uplMrIM111h
h�M<tt�iiii3€
x�MmNYOYnNnl43iVJlw�pnmve3ayrM€l�ylwNdlAFlwrvlvA(Pfia�wi{v}5pW,14t.I41ME€E�bPB€fw
Dischar ee s and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes "QNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
J�fl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

liacili Number: j - Date of ins ection:7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ONE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: a
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to theintegrityof any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
SkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
`N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
FX] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crap Type(s): i�j� ��►ll��! Q cS V JtaP
13. Soil Type(s): Gr��ff�. II V
14. Do the receiving crops differ om those designated in the CAWMP?
[] Yes
V9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
tR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ftNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
CKNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes
[XNo
❑ NA ONE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [—]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
I' No
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�q No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ERNo
KI NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
�`�'�
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 4 - Date of Inspection: -7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[g No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
C� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
23 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA I'M NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
'� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
Z[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
O Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
®"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
.....
,,
I (refer taiAaesho # �{Ex lamlan y.YES answers adddid/organ-add>Iti)nai recommendations or('anp-'othedreamments�a.k r vIdjIi
Ilia&'y^.vll o r.l .olp �• �,. g [, ���I. Il3i.r:I:�,j ��P ;Iy1 ❑ €B€ fa l fH' rt8 I.4IeiP I °78 i i EI 1 E et. r :II :1 ,I ✓
i Y,- i ..a , ,Ill € i; i�.: -.r1 t..,., #r{}S , ttli(!i.-Idl ,S f,dddl, it Pr ..lad (@E l ilc>a.?GPPIt=-ddd,Itl. l!!di [dl.. IPd�€Ruth ?($ltll! Il NI li i ;di i td<i+r, I ? dl l
se,drawmgs'of�fgeil(ty,. a, better,,explain,srtuations,{use,additional� pages: A& necessary).:",��:,r� f) ld(I?Ii1 ld if ��i ��li�(}, �i
a�-- h►hitl�y has sv�`fi"ci$if
S(ud)eSyry l4,14r
5 '? Ual .tV0
G6fdl)d'l .) . 5" s
4 u 0 10 yti 410 a,
a�- Co 01
a IWMPA*ej Sol' 17-1-60d10 , WO d0a,oA19'Q f b6e d6lydf�ab,4/#�e
5)d 8 jl$ Woo -7 Pime coot GUf re,* DIv� {} + d{� `G' bda�f49� 4
�Ja.3l iq IV66 Sb3p
Iagl�$ . 0-3.5,3,7s[J#5 Mdieja 9 06 l gig
IDlasll� �r4na�aa
�7)190 WOO Oy;) 0
�I3((� w00_77_7q
�13J w06Y?A
IS up` odAe
Reviewer/Inspector Name: _�—d iy1 sch (j o
1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 U J &A, Sc }nMKOrU an y0 ✓
Phone: 11 q_W _V 9 k
Date:U a Q
21412015

Division of Water Resources
',rracilit Number - © 0 Division of Soil anLZ
d Uater Conservation
�+ Other Agency
Type of Visit: 19 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: trRoutine O Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral D Emergency () Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 'Jjayj�2 Arrival Time: 'Q Departure Time: County:
rin
Farm Name: ���� ror Owner Email:
Owner Name: }V}i� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: W-N T6Xn,fr SI& A , Pout 60�j
Facility Contact: • IhLel ns Title: y►ae"n Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Certification Number: % 3
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region: R Rio
Design Current
Design
Current
Curet
Poultry
Caii pacity
Pop.
Hint
Cattle CapaPop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
D
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P,ouitr,
Ca acity
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other JEJ
10ther
Discharges and Stream lmt)acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Walke Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E No [DNA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):_
Observed Freeboard (in): a3 Qy
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
f' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
;K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
15? No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window{ Evi iep�7c�S of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ed0j �'(i 0 ,d C�1���
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
r'�7r No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have al l components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall [] Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge`?
[] Yes
tEg No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
D3�NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Ad the'Iacility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes tg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes CS No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes 4No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes `® No
❑ Yes [A No
❑ Yes Dg No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer, to question #):.Explain any YES answers and/or, any additional recommendations,or any other comments.
Use �drawings`of facility to better explain situations "(use additional. pages as necessary).
a� }vhi* will nel�. � hrs Coi6L4? @d-b l� 13) II g -7. Asmdll r' ison D�Fs^�
s,sl�d% 5��e iabob* p��� lrrl a or)ab0Arnftow
G�fza Br tri.� s YV411 be—
e- 5, s Y '3 -his's M-K.
4s 3g
01.cdtfb o al04
Flow 70 4g a`
wak AAakys>P)
� srYt�O q 41q
I � n hrOD 3� 3
/1141 �
qhl try MOMS
613011r YVOW03�
31 hrDOb
b+111na i s u'o'M dE cttI✓
J
soi � �763s' 31aa �l�
�.Irne �70� Pall d*s
w2 below 1 Tonkc, .
&Oi,l
w lMober
Reviewer/inspector Name: l aQ_5('hAf I
Phone: 11`1 (7IHOI? {
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 UJOd� schn�i�r(�7ncd�n r q Q✓.
Date: AVI - a o 12
21412015

DIMS CPJS 34711 (o
Type of Visit: V Compttll ce Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: VRd'utie O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: td` Arrival Time: Departure Time: � County:
Farm Name: s F`Ur Owner Email:
Owner Name:Yc�Tt'y/[7D&J YyJ,. )*,Jd,0W r*,V.s Phone:
Mailing Address:
Region: R
Physical Address: DO-7y U�uner D ri'ddp- �. P&,- Ooks
Facility Contact: Tyhl�y S�/IS�/1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �flf'lri�,yUi1$tSQn Integrator:
Certified Operator: hlh lfv ,,) Pehe,1 m Certification Number: � 1o43SI
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle C►apacity Pop.
Layer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Dairy Heifer
Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
l
Dr, Poultry C*.a .aci
Layers
P,p ,. Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
rk
Other koults
Other ItOutrhe±r
Discharees and Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? .
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ElStructure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

vaciFTN umber: - Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: Cc
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift [3 Application Outside of Approved Area
yyyy,❑
12. Crop Type(s): Md��.,_1P !P_ %01,�i_7j Vl#lyQa l� 4 6,214 SM411amio
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
CE No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
4421
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
23: If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: SI 1 Date of Ins ection: � I I'S
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
R] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
[—]Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[]Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any' -additional recommendations or;anyother,, comments.,
Use drawings:of'facility to better explain situations,( use additional pages as necessary).
a�E�rh 1`IQ wi11 r ed hovy cur& ed- bit -he ed �y �a19 y3A �ls
51�d �r� r esfi " -ar el la to
aS, �s a� ly for a� �� ,-�1-s i �f�,,'il-)I �i� ,y
h � 17`t IT la rrSlI wd.sUrvey -h,Is�qdr,
a9'Cal ibtdon 1"13al1q, wir II heek Cali Woj-Ws year
t, �Va sameks rr7 5oI)S0 i s(.ao�`6k, 4�a1�3� �f -n r�r_below Ira,/a-c, 14Q00,
1ao<<� 4i14 1 1) so +U, �eed�.�iis �� , Ma n4 lime,
I�i1�l� wooer, y %
�1�Ils W00 M3 I
31aa1�s w��o1 11311 -��bah►1 �a�y
bjo fflfe_ L'Tqd
�d, iv'i�.r r ea�e�Clih�all CB��n�#a816 403 4t
dory In
i Yr mWcAIn ph)-toexild,
p � Won., k-fa0O� MUem; FV-to W
pil�noa eat �, �"C&�.qXo
(N�)a9wed d) s111b is ofo d�e, M&W, ok ti-5� MmlyW944,1111w l 11,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ���-'1 ScJr nN_fi�r Phone: qlq jq j-ga3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:tp/l, Date: a
Page 3 of 3 21412014

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: P Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 5 Fbor Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1✓ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Region: *PJa
Physical Address: _ �� ahvn-A. Mdao , PoI!! QQkl
Facility Contact: s Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �1/h � Q/yPAC& Integrator:
Certified Operator: ��1r1 �rS�e�he�lst�t - - -� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity
Wean to Finish La er DairyCow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Weant.
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
j$
Design Current Dry Cow
Dt. P.ouitr, Ca aci I;o Non -Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkcy Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes & No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? []Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes CgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - qh jDate of! ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):_
Observed Freeboard (in): a9_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Qg*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[—]Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
j'0'71 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
C' Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
X] Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
11001j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
� NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility umber: 5 - Date of Inspection: $
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Z] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
N NE
❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Z] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Zj No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any.other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
%_wh;t q n>pdr & ho j coA-fil►o tht &0 of-ftle yea^
,. la130114 �daw►��
5,0
Lif
q�f0
1a)3011y - 5�y�E� 7��, J abg � 1E ref +�dE Careeis,]
ay Cad r� ayvs>aMla
t]s00
1_�9- sl1
7I�1�pkfioD0ca#r,
N&Ss Mf��
�M3(a Oda
.wDO(mp 4IlpI
W00 �sliy wdeh WNrvyy
bP
�(aol
wed
yvpos �b J 3 )mil i }
I S II Sam le aalclA
Cv�gjq(5- `1 �,Dq& rnow 6tYj lie 6 , Vellm, .
a; l ll Ij p`�» Ja>� �
CAdd f�'thal ink a W� ko- PadUc� COryJ.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
4-tQ_owee,6'
ylodn Scharf& Phone: R1R7%_g0_3y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: g a0 S
1412014

M
� Div'i"sion of Water y KZ'�0� J
Facility Number j - ®Division of Sail and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: & Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: OFRoutine 0 Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
ilol
Date ofVisit: Arrival Time: r , Departure Time:
Farm Name: _%Ai y _ R lGU1 P_ V Q/' Y
Owner Name: 1�Vht� ��P4 .shYDIFf'nS S Av �Ll/M
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representat
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
81,101
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: Region: �0
Title: ow,14-
Integrator:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number: 1643
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine G, a —pa c I t ipop. Wet Poultry Capacity Fop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
11 INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
X1
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current
it Ca aci P.o P.
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
I
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
OtherI
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharpes and_Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
" ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili N mber: - Date of Inspection: 411ollij
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ,3 1 a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
CgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
rRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
C'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
�,Crop
12. Crop Type(s): i tt�t,L rQal-b2l
13. Soil Type(s): I-e0d, S
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes C2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [5j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes allo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
Ga-NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

IFacility Njimber: .9- y Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [R-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [5j-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes CRNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [S No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [M No ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of'facility fo.better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
r)f-,Pd r hrs co,-Sih ed beFb,e- to le 11s-
t�
as� sr� °�9� st���eys nl�ed ~k�l r pol Lan mar -�Ic
, p-i-cols
a, C40 6orfiol d A� it s
� P l�1PGY',_ ap#� Coil �ar�DA1' W� � �g9�m �ia�l�d �a9lP
m Mel
a I"so i 004l751' 1' (414113 -sLq0 qQow COrtPr4 Zrir���, A41 pgirv.�d* I `�/u'cle ii!r�Pnr�r
�sIf- 4notyfj
W0034-7
1131+y "DI
WOO I-7q a,
g1)(5(1.3 0.17
w®® _;qa�,
5_130 (13 I-�3
Woo 0a07
3 iarl 13
7t Pleo)e_ yvol k a, pas 0,1 10 jfrm 001
form har resJmL us� k sheep who'e+h e-
no do rc7l�vc,� c, -lve r�G�lS�r.0 p•,d vle tie Y'' �e �_fiA
� - I' boa "INN- e4, add u -b �1$, a+oryot-v dove--t�llr n�hll a�
sArw*&I n m 61 �9 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:p�n
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
M1-m
Phone:
Date: Apnd i o a 0
21412011

n htS 011311
iVj
Type of visit: ® "mpuance inspection v Liperation xevtew V btructure r vaivanon V i ecnnicat ,assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine ($Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: T o h#9`6 Region: P R
Farm Name: Owner Email: WA 'IVY ibafS' mef_
1 �
Owner Name: ��il T �'�y S` eOpheidol Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Wh l l t, E�ey l (m Title: QVd er Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 Integrator: h 1t. ff
Certified Operator: KA-1ty SkA."Sal Certification Number: 16 13
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
C.apac�ty
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
La er =
I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. Point .
a
Ca a,
P,oP .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
I
Beef Stocker
Gilts
I
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment 014)
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ® NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
®NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [] No
❑ NA
® NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
[@,NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
Cj;?NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2g NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[]NA
ONE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
C'NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[Z NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
aNE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA MINE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 51 - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [R NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA U NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
2] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [Sa NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ® Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ® Yes ❑ No (] NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Its 1"nsfectlq1 War d1fe.'Fv 0,1 an�rn aw Ca►a Idrf- merved eelY Hadar, a, al/oft y g6a,i -
&eqfi ha M de
adpfts e awe a°,,- a 16d r a; 3o PAf
ei�- Chec441-hcf-'+d--%M lxeial P -jlvt proceed&L_�a`f� Secm,d a�r4,,Thls ell -was c0'A'91eV6CC(W_e
9"Ve, aid ma+a I fr rVar al ve -t v PP O e& -N e om e� , I`l- laokl�C � have be% a. Me i�
Ona h i l l sho ld'er Ivi-, file. l aid svr c� Oh es% C asf ef�r ca 11 talda ( 3rs
; A(
21da
,The talusVwol aj� OAd,Scttir a� .319) f �;JgA4 wehi-ka. , Peju oir `f�rnamat MW6( cal(
btlrl'q I wi-r a q h ots ai`-a m Jj rm 0, d 1=ii*7(P_ o' 5-bofWF &0" a f (ow l �r_f-eaP7 , XJJ&17a I
r
�e�n'rP�IrGt`�1`f�QbnlYm4j mAhl are /lavt f file.S' e �efe/rin
re�(�+U� iI n t/At s f , 1 '
uloL f A�F i aU , Th,e ma sht�ld 6e Sen`f- iv-Ne. R �Gha D�Frce w,�'; /
da p ?wa.r (1il� r 14- w, O'h fih�
1 � 4e nvl�es sod+c� n �`1^e v� �w�71f� 1� r`�'h � �, Dwn�ay` 7��,e ,
ewar`m abo `h,e n �r�,al ma al,'� re�L��PMat�l a6o y: as PM l,�l 31�j rvI`fi� � r �e�l a-,
Comrnen�andclarA&c bjj e Mj1,je(a, �1,� a,df�e, hu�dco w'lJbe b 3 �11 w-
u�'bc�ler�q, ire yew �trral si , h1/ bedo,e '`�' (�) V1h `heA4Ww i fib-, w pia
weeks, .7 ('`i1'
Reviewer(Inspector Name: s'C j}f h Phone: % I 7q —y)0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:%41kDate: "mil 13 )ow
-
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - ® Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Ag ;ncy
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:,3tA,1tiS(`Cr&/ Region:.
Farm Name: Say., dam! y d fLK Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: V��hl*� ��1eQt►e,n50�J Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
a er
La'
Design C►urrent
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Design Current
D_r, I;oultr. Ca ueit P,o ..
Layers
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Q
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
I
I
ke sPoults
Prkey
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes I/(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [ f_No
❑ Yes 7 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili umber: 5 / - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structtge 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:�11!
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): an_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes WfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [EI/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): L
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes .j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes , f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ,2!rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes 7No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,E� No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Ds ection: `6 —
24. Did the facility-tail'ty cto calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes %%%t/I No
25. Is the'fal ilioutompl of ciance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below. a0 4 a �): -
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes WrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes jZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ,] No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or; any other commentL.; £ ,
Use drawings -of facility to better explain situations; (use additional:; . ages as necessary].
rcn - Cj 1 t'l oil o `
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: Q I g 7914931,
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: /40 C_om�fiance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: .Routine i) Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
t
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Sohfl5jQfJRegion: e ��
r
Farm Name: 5CL ` �`,, Q _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 11,aL
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine !opacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Wet Poultry
La er
Non -La er
Dr, P,oultr,
Design
C►►opacity
Design
Ca aei
Current
Pop.
Current
P,o ..
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dai Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other"Turkey
Other
keys
Poults
Other
im
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes J;31No
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacilky Number: - Date of inspection:
of
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes.,ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes �no ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes goNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) /�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes :'� }' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? /
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes )2< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes RTI�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Z&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes„ no
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 12,-No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Nu=er: - G Date of Inspection
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
;2 o
❑ NA ❑ NE
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[;;,1tTo
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
TT
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
F,-O�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
ell
J' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes P[lNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes f!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �`No
''❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone/ ` 7V
Date:
. :5144 0�-)
21412011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit�R%ouettiine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: If/J/1� 1l Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:3Q J( dNt/Region: OZR0
Farm Name , In CIU 9,l _A gzJo (' k _ Owner Email;
0
Owner Name: 3 t-C_P jla0 dV_) lV`S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity P.
Wet Poultry C pacify Rap.
C*attle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
IbOD
n Current
re
D Cow
Farrow to F e r
Dr, P.oultr ci Pao
Non -Dairy
Farm 2k
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gifts 4E I
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Soars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Pouets
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[]Yes []No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes []No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[]Yes []No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 51 - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 35 3�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [''No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [] Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ YesTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I /f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 7`-''
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 16 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ hlydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s).
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes��o ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
25"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
V No
TT
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[] Yes
PI -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONO
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 71'No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes V�No
❑ NA ONE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -_j jDate of Inspection: 67
24. Oid the -facility fail to calibrate waste application n equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is [he facility ©t ooff coreianceLwiith�ehnit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ,PI/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ,2!rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes .L'_I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommeiidations:or�any other comments." ��,• . �x� �:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
a o E D S wa-
Sf a-s)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
jt�_ I y 9 °70 j, o'tA du-'- 9 O 11
a-
y- ag--►I
Phone: b
Date: 1, h
/ 011

0 "
L
f Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time- i / i7t - i County: ORegion:
% 1"% e
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: QQ Title:
Onsite Representative: �.�„ 1LS _ �J deiAOAIAPn
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator.'%31 � Mo rttiln,"
Operator Certification Number:
Back -up -Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ I ❑ « Longitude: ❑ ° = 1
Design Current
Design Current Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder I 1
10 Non -Layer I
I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
Farrow to Feeder lb
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Stocker
❑ Gilts
El Non-Layers
ElBeef Feeder
El
❑ Boars
❑Pulle
❑Beef Brood Cow
LiTurke s
Other
❑ Other
❑Turkey Poults
❑ Other
I Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ YesI o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 St ure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ///
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
IdNo❑
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes UlNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
I4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes �dNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
LQ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
L No ❑ NA
❑ NE
'IfIi-ti�i
Reviewer/inspector Name ~: ` t Ali'; r t_ Phone: % and
Reviewer/inspector Signatur Date: d
Page 2 of 3 1212*104 Continued

Facility Number: 15— Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XNo ElNA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElNo
Yes . ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Flo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
No
ElNA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes PKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 01&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
'�
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
[]Yes RfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes La No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addit>analComments andlo`r, Drawin s i {;
TT-a-e 10 6 W_-t� SO - ONka� ao I n
aA-'_k 0 9 ce/sleq p- 9 . (6 :11l : q tS ffa-
UA dam- s o c I
r
Ulv) 44-k�
Page 3 of 3 12128104

R
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit C pliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason fqr V it Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency `O[ Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: s;m�_o
r� r V `-'
of Arrival Time: t Departure Time: County Regi
VFarm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = 0 0 6= Longitude: 0 o 0` 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑
Daia Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes /rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes Z Noy ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: s — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate`?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes 21'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ;54
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes /No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes Oo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes 0"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?El Yes [:�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes ] No
❑ NA [I NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: r?q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
J 12128104 - Continued

Facility Number: —L Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
❑ Yes JZ/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,,2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ,2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfali ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections
❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[]Yes
?(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
�io
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
RrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
J!rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ YesZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
AL
sv i -Xoj',
1,3
s l i 10 9
r,/ / G / o 1, 1 1, 3
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit 6mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit j�>0outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:9?�OI-N k I e—% a
Arrival Time: ICJ Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owneri�1�� '>r.7i1.•1+l►>>�`r!7��ITtt:��+lf�)J��a1L� .Phone:
S Q
Mailing Address: Kv_r_ '+ r
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: _l
Certified Operator: �11� �-I P 5 l7hO VLS�i V
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 1 = 11 Longitude: = ° = 1 =
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Ccity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry,
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑Beef Stocker
Gilts
❑ ers
❑ Beef Feeder
PEl
Boars
Pullets
❑Pllets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
the
❑ Turkey PouIts
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
i . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
4,No
El NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
,Z/No
2 o
El NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes
7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes
o
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
,� /
?"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
o
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
[I NA [I NE
maintenance/improvement?
tNo
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
El Yes
VN
❑ NA
❑ NE
.I P. �f .*;°'rsk. �.k x,,d.i .
omen�ts��{ efer togiiesttons#) Expla�tnapyYES answersand/oar any, rec�o�mmendnon�s orany other comrnents.
Use druwmgs of facility toybetter cxp�ain�s,ituat�ons (use additional pages,asJhecessaryl)
Reviewer/Inspector Name (
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (1 9
Date:
Page 2 of 3 1 f
12128104' Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes�Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need imp vement? If yes, chec the appropriate box elow. []Yes V]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis aste Transfers A ual Certification
Rainfall Mocking Crop Yield 20 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1"Rain Inspections?No
Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. D' tj��faci� email to calibrate waste application equi ment yequired by the permit?
25. id t facility fail to conRct a sAie� as required bye permit?
b
26. Di the faci ity ai to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Comments and/or Drawings:
0 Al i
y- &OPY
N4"u4t4--
ElP�o ❑NA I--] NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �rlqo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes JNo
❑ Yes ZI No
❑ Yes 4NO
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA [I NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes �f l ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

FARM WHO
5RP002
5/26/2008
5/25/2008
W06433 3/26/2008 1.8
1 /2612008
Irrigation
5/7/2008
W04170 3/8/2008 1.5
1/8/2008
Irrigation 1 /712008
12/30/2007
12/29/2007
W02929 10/30/2007 1.6
8/3112007
Irrigation
11/4/2007
W01624 9/5/2007 1.9
7/7/2007
9/14/2007
W00347 7/16/2007 1.7
5/17/2007

I --
Division of Water Quality
Facility Dumber O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
-n O Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 F flow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: eparture Time: Con ntyz6&9 r-22yn% Region.l
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: iv Integrator:
Certified Operator: J�%17«T 1� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: 0 O = 6 0 Longitude: 00= 1="
Design Current Design Current
Capacity . Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
i� ❑Non -La et
Dry Poultry
Nc
Pu
Other
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: J Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: $�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes epNo
❑ Yes , No
Structure 5
❑ Yes ICJ No
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑NA ❑NE
El NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stucwres lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
OKNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? El Yes
KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:$ Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail have Certificate of C v rage & � r ' readily available? ❑ Yes �N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the fa li y ail to have all � components ofthe CAWMP r adi1 available? if es, check Yes No NA NE
facility p � Y ❑ ❑ ❑
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑ ether
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard PrWaste Analysis Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
El Rainfall [I Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspec ions ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes V(No
❑ Yes FfNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:]
0
Q7
4 spy%
9/6107
_to 003 9�' �/'/
'
9 :2 LP�
12128104

Type of Visit .110 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit (1 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
f
Arrival Time:
1a
Departure Time:
CountyA.O1 FST. %A
Region:
Farm Name:
SA,J91/
8--12C,C_
CC) S-V--
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: W 4 11f_4 S''i+=! 69nL J
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
ILS9
C699
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
..Other
❑ Other
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: �(
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = I Longitude: = ° = ' ❑
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Nan -La ej
Miry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Puilets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dai Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes tZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: S t — Date of Inspection >fo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �� 25
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ElNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
•2.3 'C ~Ls S
12. Crop type(s) KA-T'j (r C1JV__ QP r ) kV16-'1) C. / t.r /—c Q
- i
13. Soil type(s) � I G e- - 3,
-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
/2fNo
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
e.° '• �a `74l YzReviewerlins ector Name Phone: I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ���� .,� ,,,� Date: , / 1 6 / o S
Continued

• , ..
Facility Number: 5 —41 Date of Inspection Z v
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes e1A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�
.,,rr r
�C��W 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If y , check the appr riate bo bel$w. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�' i. L +t �
ElWaste Appation ElWee*k free oard El Wash Analysis Soil Anlyys_19� ElWaste Transfers ElAnnual Certification
❑ RainfaIC❑ Sto king ❑ CrXYield ❑ 120 MinuInspections ElMonthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weat Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes/Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes VTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 5.1 ' 6. 7- r ❑ Yes RfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes PfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Vj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

Type of Visit grCompliance
Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
9 Routine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: LLLATI Departure Time: r County:
Farm Name: rf�� �ir?�+t2 G Y_ ����� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: n Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Region:
Integrator: �� :i JG - MFAI)O�j
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 00 = g 0 Longitude: 00
0' 0
Design Current
Swine
` Destgn Current ,
Wet Poultry
�'� Design Cetrrent
Cattle `acity
Ca a ity Fopulation
C city PAopulat on
Capp PO ulllation
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
2-=:
_DairyCalf
Dairy Heifer
❑ D Caw
Dry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder''
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
Gilts
❑ Non -Layers ers
= ❑ Beef Feeder
8001 Boars
El Pullets
Y ❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Otherill
❑ Turkey Poults
'`
❑ Other
❑Other
Number of StructuYres:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continuer)

i`acility Number: S t — `AJ0 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural Freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1 2
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z 'Z3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
,mot
lJJ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
1
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑Ao
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside
of Area
Z.-vs
12. Crop type(s) Ar'r.1 ?s— 6- C _201A(�
13. Soil type(s) 7a C; ,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
101 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes//]
No
El NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
it No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Hz,j r;i� #: a^i 2.. ems` Tf, zwr
Reviewer/inspector Name , ?,. ,. � � � ,� t.. s -.ri' ,s".. Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 1 T b s
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S) — Date of Inspection 1
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If es, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
I t I.L !11z i.s 112 '3
❑ Waste Ap(ication El Weekly Freloard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soi! Uysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rai0all ❑ Socking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weat)(er Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25,
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
;?�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28,
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
V o
El NA
El NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Add�t odalComments.andlor>Drawinls
12128104

71
. _ 4.
o� �1 1 v
t�c„',�:'a�:'��:.:.�'.v"7"s:. �'_ _.. ....e,..... a 3 �,�.,� .,� ?.�.,..„N�en: ar �.. •. ,,. ... s�'.. i ,,, ... � v..�.W - _. �. ...'� ........ ., s". � r �_�'.^) I
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
rO not Operational 0 Below• Threshold
E3"Permitted/b Certified [3 Conditionaliv Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _ S�^r2f�_1?f dR� County: *rfST
Owner -Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: hW Integrator: SAA+'"J�- M eAN,, Z rm
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: %.6 4;
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 0 ` D µ Longitude 0 0 1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acfty Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Laver I ❑ Dai
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Laver I ❑ Non-Dairy
arrow• to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 2— , ,'�❑ Subsurface Drains Present JI❑ Laeoon Area_1❑ Spray Field Area'
,Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
-" ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System' ,
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Laeoon ElSpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes )z No
Waste -ColLectipp & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes '10 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: z
Freeboard (inches): �-�
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Sj — Date of Inspection I ti
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes aZ No
❑ Yes ;ZNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes PNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (FNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes PNo
12. Crop type t1� 6- 3 r Cr • L32Q ^.1�Ir 27~s ,
131. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAR'MP)? ❑ Yes ON
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ;INO
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes )J No
Reouired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.) L
❑ Yes ZNo
19.
�o t.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irriga%n, freeboard, was a analysts &soil sampl to
❑Yes �LI No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑Yes o
21.
Did the facility- fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
22.
Fail to notify regional DW"Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes ;EfN
(ie discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
o
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes A No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ZeNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes P1110
IALNn violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
•.F":.-i:. .'-.-il.w.... : ...�t�wi-.•!�'!-•' -' -- r'rf 9'k-::'-+'.Yfs. 'iiiL53.'�`.n.Ua4rid$tl�.: lr� m3^'S1.y;.rr
Comtnents'{refer to gnestsod#)c 'EZj3le3A aII3T} Y $'BRSwerS a11d/or AIIy TeCQIIIIIIeD Ono 0 ,8 other_co IDCRtS y , + �T q�l r `
i'.^-
tise drawings of f�aMcility,to better eezp6latn situ sittions."}{nse additional paggesAastteee({s� ary) ;1'
ii. ❑Field Copv ❑ FinaI Notes
i4�`Y:
4,�!� .Q&M1 Ly , ��w. 5 N1�L7 r•. '�"�A.d?il�✓�1f�:1 .ALYiww f.ii4ti._+w �.Cnrw-.• .•^TT't.^wv!.•.v.m,wn•.�- —� .i.YY.a�'{i
�. 'r_'�J.1O�E,.}� �,+1 LAGo�j,.'S 'ru MAOOo AA: Zs WWI a
AntD 1�oit•3:+.�.� �,�C �yt4• 5• S
Reviewer/Inspector Name ru. " {'•:1 .,'3 +„+ty � �` s � k i' z,; tz ` fir" ' �4 ,` `s- • j�`.
w ��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: •--� Date: 1
05103101 I Co#tfnued

-Y
Facility Number: — So Date of Inspection
or Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perrnanentdtemporary cover?
es ❑ No
///���❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes I*
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes 'J6No
Additivgal Gamnrin ntii, and/or prawings ;
Aex/}er o,J A4D E✓A-PoP-ter: .J r�� S G�1Ss '�c�4„s i RL
r
05103101

Type of Visit rC,00mpliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit �v Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date oFVisit: V=NotO
3 Time: f'
eration1 0 Below Threshold
A51P­e,r,mltted ertitied [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _ Arliff `c.;JGL_ N'i County: _ �1 w'[W-ff'-
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: H �-�y �� Integrator: b M 41�
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ° 64 Longitude Oe 1 6.
` Design Cur'rent Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population.. P ultry Capacitv Population Cattle CHI)Hcitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairyl
❑ Feeder to Finish JEJ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean _ _ — .......
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity i
❑Gilts Tota1:SSLW
❑ Boars
Number ofiLagoons ®F '' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
:Po Holdtn nds 1 SohdaTra s ='
x g� p � . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
t. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment 3� '
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than ad6giiate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 -Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: / ='M 2—
Freeboard (inches): s
7.
05103101 .
❑ Yes 2 NNo
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;2�o
❑ Yes 01N*o
❑ Yes P"No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: ,S I — Date of Inspection L o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
"
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
�{
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
� ] No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
gNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
FgNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there eviden pf pver application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type (� V ( 2 3 .l�$r- Z
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
elqo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;�rNo
Renuilred Records & DocumRUt
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coveragg(/eMl Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
.L�-vo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Manement Plan readily available?
% L y
❑
<o
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / 1,6
r -�W Z6 el /.I Y�
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri5ation, freeboard, wa a anal sis &soil sam Ieports)
Yes
❑ Yes
.�,N o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ONo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
I'lKo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
VN,
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
90
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #} Explain iany YES answers and/or an), recommendationsor any.other comments. :
IUsera wings, 'flfacili ttoltietteraexplaii�n situations: (us%additlottal pages -as necessary)'WrField Copy ❑ Final Notes
i� r'E.0 S JdCi A i1e G&-ttO Y'fl" t V its f r
�j t'
,,rot .� 7tti. '�i 'l £. %_ i r, E- N��{ `� er AFc'a.J _ h �. F �?.<+Lslv
Ttd r5 $ 'yi
Reviewer/Ins ector Name` 7,
P to V �? r „C
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z b
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number: S1 — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
PTNo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
P1110
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
PINo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes
❑ No
Additional`Comments�aniilor,l)r:.uw n s �� � �.�; , .
AL
05103101

1►
Type of Visit RQ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
fieason for Viaitx'Routine O Complaint. O Fonow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number ! Date of Visit: b ime: �t7p
O Not Operational_0 Below Threshold
Permitted ertified U Conditionally Certified U Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .
Farm Name: ................s!'a:'.......k. ...... a12-- . County:........... a......... . .....................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ; S ......... "�.���`x.� �i................................ integrator:...... s �z,a�....µE..&.4..,...............................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:...,..... .........................
Location of Farm:
HN
wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �4 it Longitude • 6 46
rE
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
cult','k_;:.Capacitv.,:Populationk„ �Csttle, ;
:, I❑ Non -Layer 1 „I I -10 Non -Dairy L
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Nua Muof Lagoons 2_ "t ', ', J0 Subsurface Drains Present III Lagoon Area . I❑ Spray Field44
Area
tl
Holding Ponds'/ Sohd Traps ' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes
Vo
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes P-9�O
c. li' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes : /o
'2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 52N�o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N`' -
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................. .t................. ............�.................. ................................... .................................................................................. ..... .....................
Freeboard (inches): S1�7
5/00 v Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed. P(iclrees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 2fNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 0No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;!(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes )2f'No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
11. is there evidence ofover appliAion? Is❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type aaS C*-- S $ Cr r ' $_ (a a .as
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste M nagement Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ONO
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ro
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo
Required Records & Documents b�g�
Fail have Certificate Covera General Permit
17.
to of a 8d readily available?
❑ Yes No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certd Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
19.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) // _ 311 �� t, 4 �r
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri on,�deboard, rv�ds�e analys�& soil1savip`6e rep6rts)
❑ Yes .P
❑ Yes PIKO
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ,[4o
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes PNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
discharge, freeboard
❑ Yes RNo
(ie/ problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes E] No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑40
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
defclepfuel ware noted. Ot;WI69 i�ls.vls}t; • Your wiil•teeoiye 00 futtho
. • 'etiriesaaridence: Motif this visit` ......::..........................: .

v=-
Facility Number: S — Date of Inspection I
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
/YYes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
4o
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑Yes
TNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
ZNo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑Yes
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes
❑ No
Additional Comments andforDrawinpr. +,
arl— pEsz vA�.; T
J
5/00

4 1 %�-1 1 'n�
Type of Visit OeC,,omCCpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit yr,��outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 5 j Date of Visit: Time:
Not O crational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ................. J.Y.. �� ".�D. G i`-.. County: ���a �-s 7"�......... ........... I ...........
........... ........................ ..................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.........................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ...........................
Onsite Representative:�`i�'TL . ...,5� P E,fS�•�.... ......... Integrator
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:...... ...................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �« Longitude �• �� �«
±vine Cap 1 'Population Poultry Capacity Populatioe . ,Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
{ b J
j O
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Non -Layer " ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
" Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of,Lagoons -.
i
Holding Ponds / Sohn Traps . ; ❑
Subsurface Drains Present JJ❑ Lagoon Area J© Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management SystemNl
'��1i1�11 ti
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ENo
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes E 'ko
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 21<0
c. II' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �Io
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑'�I0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;31�0
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....... Vf-................... ...........-..I...............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: — 6 Date of Inspection Printed an:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management of
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public. health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
1 /9/2001
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
4 /S :e
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does thefacility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re uired Records & Doctiments `r
17. Fail to have Certificate,velf leVeneral Permit readily available?
a ]
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified .� mal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ja
3 j I�
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irron, freeb d, wa te�nalysis & soil samp�e're�orts)
Ss nt, T'b
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Q Yi tiorls:o ' � f cue e{es ry re � ed Og �hIs:v1spt;, Y:oo�Jlj-teeeiye 00 further:
cori'espimdence: ahoilt this visit::... :
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ Yes
W&o
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes
,�No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
(�10
❑ Yes ,fNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;3<o
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes PIN
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0o
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes �01NO
❑ Yes L31q'o
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 'CIN0
❑ Yes ;:�iQo
4E9�� � W-+�_e«►�s (s��� FkC.A" c��P��W,,NPOA59 ��r�,r 0/,( us4-toQ4 ,_fn A A.
pu
/�i'r�t'�N NJ �I��E1 [���� �t��[,� • �`� j/ f S C� �-G W j w% / -'.,-�,r VA a (,ems I �� �•O /�nl� /�w i 4 P�lq-Cr I� l• (-.1��' �Q,w
�L5L �U"'��c�� r�%��i E` Tr• /
IpGmMME'n� E� 1ANP Of' PULLS Fvt 6BCbAtr'%04 07'"A 'rf-AVSLLc4_A44�1
RH P�L�..; t�►c�..►n� A�eCa� Pam- Pui-L,
��, � J {�-£ TO 1' v4 � ►�T L� +vt E A x tJ E�� j ��^v�+ � n Cb FL��rn s� t' �� Q'�.s�"r '
Tr
'Ta 'j�E s11AC Z VZ�, ems. -aJ EQtDF_N
REVlewer/In8 eCtOr Name ;� a€a� �I p 3 �31 7� !ii r SEA k mkwl, E`IE �y a+fig j p
p �. ,I} i ., a JyJ. &9`. ;6:,ML.;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ( �,r ,,,,� — Date: 5/001

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
Qdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 21-No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 1'No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes R$io
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 4!�No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ONo
'24- ) llrl L,1 -J GV-a- 4" a-C-L> ,
A61
5100
J

c
. r O'Div�sion of Soil and Water. Conservation Compliance Ins
tvtston of Water Quality CompLance ns Ipection ,
Ci Other Agency = Uperatiori,Review,.•��,,hp ...._rc w.
Routine OComplaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number S Date of Inspection 5 Z - '00
Time of Inspection �� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Mermitted,G<ertified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .5±,tDA.. o.�.....f..ol?- County:........�T aJ
OwnerName:..... .......�av.... 2 .................. Phone No:............. ......... .......................................................................................................
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:.......
MailingAddress: .....................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: . t E,J +J
Certified Operator:... ...............................:................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:..... !V J MEADuyj
Operator Certification Number:,,,,,,,
....... ............................................................................... .. . •r
Latitude
De"signa
"'°"Cu
;;!wme , 'CapacityPopulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
co
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude•
Design Current ,' ; ; �.
.Poultry .
Ca °aci� Poula 'tion ' Cattle,r�,�1,;
. .
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
E�
❑ Non-1 B
U
' ❑ Other
a[4
Total Design Capaci
Total SSLi
Discharp,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin !
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? ([f yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes I'No
❑ Yes FdrNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes J[ ^No
❑ Yes /Q"No
❑ Yes 8 No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ..............l,...........................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: •$ - Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes Plfqo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 9No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes p'No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes )z No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes ,91No
12. Crop type d�- 2-5 f- 01-i w 1-W-A a/ 9Q 14 of
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those iesignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes .,,eNa
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes,,eNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes .� �O
16. Is there -a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �o
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes j"No
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
WUP, design, etc.)
❑ Yes E!(No
(ic/ checklists, maps,
/
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste ana sis & soil same reports)
❑ No
20.' Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design?
❑ No
Zs
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 01No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
FrNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 0'N0
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ,00o
��1Q yiolaignjs'ojr• ftrjcaejmcie$ *�re )rtpted• ftr ing s.vjs;it; - Yoecgiye o fur • . • .
Corresb6fidence: about. this Visit.
7� Mf J7--?"StrJ plSc.u,sEE.D A rEr-O i`o ?WS; J9 Ly Aoo
� � D �, z3 � �t- �l4-Cs� Jt, � i '� �° "1 � J L- � C�NGt' S 5'M F I�•j ��orL i16 A i '�'`orJRt. �CaM MCiJA �
Li.)L-- A MoPa�Ft�c.Ai�`d�S'� SLIaNt 0 ADVr'-E LA.-, �V^O't+A
A-P i?L' C/S V L-%Z_
Reviewer/Inspector Name ',. t, , ;^ ' 1` $. ``r# a`r"'a.9', .1'•'-,; €E {(. 4' j- r i -' i ,
b�l",,.:,�,. „.�V_._
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L,., Date: C-f zyr AQ-1,

Facility Number: S I- Date of ILispection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below 0Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ,EYNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 0No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 20 Ko
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes _+—'o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes �0
z1-} c),ie 1-w-, 3toWa Irk -r� r L,4 6oa d

J ;1
'DiVigion of,Soll and,Water CoI15eCYatlOn ,OpErdtlon Rk V1eW
E � ,. ..
�'Dlvision of Water Quality Comp p • p P n Division of Soil and Water Couservatlirn - Com Nance ins ectio
Q y - Compliance Ins cchonri
Other Agency,- Operation Review " t'
IgRoutine 0 Complaint _O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other —
Facility Number Dak of Inspection 2
'rime of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered [3 Not O cration.Il (late Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: ........,SAt4c.,. . I)C'M County: ...... !4�0.NST-04....... ..............
.......................
Owner Name: ....l±!'r..1�.t........f..l?S'��^i...................................................... ['hone No:..........t3.....'....?. g.........................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ... .................................................
Mailing Address: ...........................................
Onsite Representative:..W.... .:i L .....S.T ! .S. L.......... Intct;rator:..-s ..........� .......................�a
M
Certified Operator : ................................................... ........................................ ..................... Operator Certification Number: .......!.E',`!,3°r................
Location of Farm-
.................. ........ I ...... . .............................................................................................................................................................................................. .
Latitude �'�' �" Longitude �• ��°�
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
i bv,�,
t 6csJ
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer _ ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons "L ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray yield Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (I!' yes, notify DWQ)'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II'discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in szal/min`
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): Y
..................................
1 i.
............................................................................................
❑ Yes"ONo
❑ Yes ❑,No
❑ Yes ;2'No
❑ Yes ep No
❑ Yes RrNo
❑ Yes Jj No
❑ Yes ;z No
Structure 6
I/6/99 Continued on back

A7
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection !
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0yes �No
4 seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan`? ❑ Yes ONO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes '0No
S. -Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of (like, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvetile nt?
❑ Yes VNo
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
El Yes ONO
12.
Crop type 4 Q.+ ..!(� �� i3+..1..................................-Bc �n�u�]l� `S/�_ Co.2Ar�...................................................
` . ...................................................
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ONo
14.
Does (lie facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
❑ Yes No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes 0No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes offNo
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes dNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.),
❑ Yes ZNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes 2rKO
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes XNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes dNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes XNo
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ;dNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes XNO
No.vialations.or. deticienries.werenoted. during Ais.visit;. You wilfre'eive nog further .:.:.
......
p .. ....about. this his .. ... . ........... . .... . ... ....... ....
Comm'' tints (refer.to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or atiy;recotnmendati.oy iis'or an ot}ier comments
.t R3
Use drawin s'of facilit .to better ez lain situations. use"additional pages as necessa )
g Y p { P.$ rJ, r
niv. er tJA.$ Q &-J1"U. 44-- C-E" e— Ak4O XUOUL D e& $uFFGdxZ IOoI Vl T
A9etp 4& s� �i� 5 �;>4t�,
Revi ewer/[ nspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C)e jt j - �4 --A Date: ?j 2Z.l 17 11/6/99

_ Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation -.Compliance Inspection q
0 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection i'
E3 Other Agency -Operation Review
O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWU inspection O Follow-up of DMVC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspcc:tion
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ❑ Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ......... Cutinty:.....................................................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:..............,........................................................................
Facility Contact: ................................................................. ...... Title: .... Phone No:
19ailint; Address ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative...
epresentative:.......... ..... .......................................... Intel rotor:...�P/Z ,(,r,... t�i�T1�,,�� ......
4•
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude = • ° ���4 Longitude °
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 1C] Non -Laver IM Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts EE -
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes/No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field- ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the i:onvcyance man-made? ❑ YesNo
h. If discharge is observed, dirt it reach Water nl'the State? (]byes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in 4gal/inin? /
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systcin? (II'ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes N o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes x
No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes �No
StrUC[UI'C I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Su-ucwre 5 Structure 6
ldcntil'iti:r:
Freeboard(inches): .... ...r i ............. .........3-6.......... .................................... ................................... ... ....................... I ...... .....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ZNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number-5/ MkIe of inspection
,0. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes _P/No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ANO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑
elevation markings? Yes 0 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ff No
11. Is there evidence of over application) ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
y'No
12. Crop type 5�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
[:]No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[:]No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
P(No
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ YeslZIN0
Records & Documents
_Required
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
11Vo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
/
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[].lQ0
,/❑
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, rreeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
El Yes
RTo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑Yes
�o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P;Vo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
O V101atiQrls.oi' &flclendeS •W ere h6fe . ft-f if4g 4i 6'vlslt. • Y,otk W fll- '&6,0V iic3 ful'th&'
correS onden' &; Out. thIS V151t_
Gomments�{refer to questiton #) any YES answers and/or any recoirnmendaions or;any5other comments i
`,Explain
Ilse drawings of facility to.lietter explainsituations. (use additional pages as necessary)
2
Reviewer/Inspector Name
--a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: r],
rl
3/23/99

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
((((r
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes��No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
YlNo
34.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
tZ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
�No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenUtemporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑70
3/23/99

lG 4 98 10 23
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Mivision of Water Quality
Q'Routine Q Como laint O Follow-up of DNVQ inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection D Z
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 3 a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
El Registered ,(Certified U Applied for Permit E*ermitted JUNot Opera . Date Last Operated: ..........................
p
Farm Name S Gt/Y� N4 Count J U C1 .......................
Owner Name: q p`
....1+.11 �..!:h!..��.......�..,�.. h'�1.%Q�.?iE. 1...................................... Phone \o•(..............�4.......3(.......... I...Q ~g8`7 �
Facility Contact: .. ?1.�f1. ....�� Title : .......... ...................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:........ . ...........W�..J 1.....�14... ....., ................... ............................. 1........................ .J.` .
11,,��''4,,
Onsite Representative:......uv .1,1419. ....S r_, ko,(l l,.. ... Inte ratcfr:. ................
Certified Operator;.....N.......""" Operator Certification Number, .................:.......................
rlll�e�..,......�!` h�............. .
Location of Farm:
Latitude =10 =' l Z 66 Longitude . ®' ®1 Ei21 «
Design , - Current (Design ,Current Design Current
Swute
Capacity Population . Poultry,: Capacity Populattpn Cattle �Capacttopulatian
`'°
❑ Wean to Feeder
-
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
=y
❑ Non -Layer
I
I
❑Non -Dairy
arrow to Weans
` ; 4
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity `
k
❑ Gilts
-
El Boars
Tota1:SSL'W
------------
«.. A
Number of Lagoons / Holdin Ponds
7 g g
❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑ La goon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
' y
S3
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
M�
General __j
1'. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes a No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes tLd' 0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Eq-�o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes EKo
c. If discharge is observed, what'is the estimated flow in -a]/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 92'N0
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0'1�4o
4. Were.there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes E3fgo
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ItG No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes M110
7. Did the facility fail to have.a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes {�dQo
7/25/97 Continued on back

Fasility Nu her: s , — y
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ONO
Structures (Laioons.Iloldina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes (,o
• Structure I 'j Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2. LT
fl
.........................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ................................................:,.,......,.,.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes I,,� NO
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes l,,,lY ,1Na
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 03"No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation Poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes EKO
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes ifNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type GbY>C. c............................. .pia.Q. .......... I ............ heG?.. �......... ...�. `? �............5 ! r-�Q�....�Yc, ........
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes, j 2'Nlo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
No.violations,or de'fidencie's,we're noted during this:visit. �:You will receive no further
correspondence ah:out this.visit: :
❑ Yes (UIo
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes [9�<o
❑ Yes `o
❑ Yes U3,50
❑ Yes it' No
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes M*o
Comments (refer to question'#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recomfnendateons or any other comments'
Use di awings of facility to;6etter explain situations (use addtfiomal'pa cs as nece5tiary) s #�, ��Ru
p3U-A6 C"
7/25/97

Mivision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
❑ Division of Water Quality
JgRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of i)WQ.in peetion O Follow-up of DSWC review• O Other
Facility Number / Date of Inspection TT
Time of Inspection ' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ....... ,Ita�`(...... F.. /r. ....�� .��. County:..G...!, .. !. .L.........................................
OwnerName..................................................................... Phone No:...,.,.....,..........................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:...,V.. a-l-r-key...........57 !f Ivsv ............ Integrator/..xw........................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number...............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' 4 4C Longitude 0 ' 46
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
gn Current Design : Current Design`
city %PopWataon -,' Poultry, , Capacity Pdpulativn Cattle Capacity
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Non -Dairy,
tl SSLW
Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
System
C
C
I■
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improve men t? ❑ Yes ZfNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �`No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
l
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes PNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 00
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes A No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes] No
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes )?�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ElNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes VNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97 Conlinu Int back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds,lush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes El No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(tt):.....1..'A.................................. D............ ................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plait (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities -Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
ZNo
&Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes �j No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
LV
4 J No
10 Ye No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
OrNo
❑ Yes
'dNo
❑ Yes J�No
(
zYes !❑ No
❑ Yes �Na
0 - No.violatio'ns-or deficiencies. were noted during* this', visit.'- Yo'U'W'ill receive•no' furtlier- : -
eorrespondeiice. about this:visit:- : • :.
47 :,g C �L.4 sW,,.
A's=enti(refer to uestion # •" Ex 6tt an YES answers and/or an recommendations Oran 'other Comments,
q paw." P �'� � �
iR&�E: s h°iei � p'S� ova r ecre °.,£`.' '�xsw'.,°".'
1�7 rawiM of ti li%to better,eat�laut situahttns. use addltional Pages as t�eeessatry}.
1 . 50n, & &9qf, &9�O A) U?P6TJz O f L d f - .t/, 1t)A;_ V r�
�s T #-6,tr15N V 6 Gc` 77;-17ei c.? % g A),O D F 9I'MMEX 10 ICUE'Arr
6-/Z,06 1"5
5 , P507M,, RU10 t71= )ZAUV k/1 rF?r—
/47V J 06,6141� AO 7,rrtn , _im 6- EAO6/" M425 v c:GvlG �r Aer—e-p Ta EST
D2 JPOd5gLa-
NU:- PlL Y Cei,Up /Tlo[A) 57/25/97
H
Reviewer/Inspector Name f F
` #� ` *�,.:. ram.. E , •�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: fZz

Facility Number: v37 — Date (il' Inspection
!�. 1`iR5 D�1G �rEi•fJ y�¢R- }�1�5 l3GeN �.�5�°)uk4C/ .
,4-0 ev ra %tJO P t6 IA uo
' PALO (t Ta 6--14�u I-jAe.. o g i� �- 3
h
nN c- peg �o v0 rz� P,c ,v 7- 04, 5
OL) 11V To TA-Ct ©,
4/30/97

SWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
[]DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10-toutine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of D%V0 inspection O Follow-ut) of l)SWC review 0 Uther
Facility Number
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Titne (in fraction (if hours
(ex.1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
10 Not O perati:onal Date Last Operated: .................................................................... ...... ... ............... I--.......................
Farm I1'ame:.... /i1....�7.r„(.C... .�.F- .....r--liw/�� County:.......5, ..~' .t %........................................
OwnerName:... i�L'I l , {{...V ........... `� .. - Phone No:................ ................................................. ....... ................
Facility Contact: ....................................
...:
............... ....................... Title:,................,.......,...................................... Phone No:...................... �....�'s .........
t"�,
Mailingaddress:.................................................................................................................................................................L. ..........
u y
Onsite Representative: J�%�r ................ /r�r'./ 1 ....... integrator:..........].LJ.Lj.1.................................................. . [.J
j 2i7
i PEPtlp R
Certified Operator: ................... Operator Ccrtitication.Nutx'��elt:;•„
Location of Farm:
Mec
Latitude ' ' 46 . Longitude 6 "
l Number of LaQ ons /Ha)dG Ponds`' I FIE] Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area '
g P Y `
Genera!
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 7No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes /No
b. If' discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 21No
c. If dischar-e is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?.(lf yes, notify DWQ)._.,".,. "'j" a, [].Yes:. No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? T ❑ Yes IN
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge. ❑ Yes [ No
5. 'Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes [io
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97 Continued on back

'Facility Number: / —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (i.,a oons and/or Holdin Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): St. r cture/l :tr �ure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
............................ ....................... .. ....I............. .. ....... I............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
<, o
El Yes
////// o
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[INo
Structure j
Structure 6
❑ Yes 0
No
❑ Yes VNO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Wyes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the St te, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type�L1..'�"I.....J.. ........... ��.....................
.....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes j No
❑ Yes
[IN0
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
jl No
❑ Yes
�I No
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
PrNo
❑ Yes
VNO
�a , fie_ oA err r m s L vv,v
r s :v7 w ,tea
. L
Reviewer/Inspector Name /t!/iIFG: :3 ;1+-% t _ i✓ i>1 t'; ,>,�7 Y�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Itf // &_
cc: Divisions of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
AT?WA
rDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 30, 1997
Mr. Whitley Stephenson
2080 Wilson Mills Road
Smithfield, North Carolina 27277
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-46
Spring Meadow Unit #1
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Stephenson:
On July 23, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the operation was not discharging
wastewater into waters of the State and that operations were
proceeding according to your approved Animal Waste Management Plan.
As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be in
compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
incerely� �a dy rrett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Ken York, Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
.RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, Norkh Carolina 27609Niq f C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

10rRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: VCertified
egistered [I Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Perniltted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:...., ......................................... . ....... .......................... ........ .......................................................
FarmName: ................ .....: 4.sAk.s1........... a.1......... 4:..I............ ......... County:..........�................... .... .......... ............
LandOwner Name: ........'k.............. .... .......�T�fL'? Nsoiv ............................ Phone No:........... ` ....... .. ...t )f,1.................
Facility Conctact:...W.! .t. SS ......... ........... Title: ............. .y!. ^ .'^............. �Prholne No:... q .y. . z1.d �. �r 4�.f✓
Mailing Address:...... 08.�............. !1 :. �.* �.........Mei�s.........lCg :.................. 5'*!.. !2...L:!.1t1.!........N�.................�..........� .............
OnsiteRepresentative: ...... P.lAy........... A,X.^!.Sn................................................ Integrator: ...... ��.........�Fi r^
Certified Operator:.. +� g ^' �/.. J . !."1 C.............................. Operator Certification Number:.....11 132................
y;v
Location of Farm:
.._f.............................s..................................................... �..........«.......... a............1.......7...........
._.....,.1..g1......m....7.....................
a
Latitude Longitude �• ��«
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [] No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 2'No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ �es 134o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [!(No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �G(No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [if/No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes L+J No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number:. 1. ...
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
53"No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
[j<o
8,
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
KO
Structures
(Lagoons and/or },folding Fonds)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
L -N-b
Freeboard (ft). Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
�.q............. .......J.'............. ........2. `........... .........2............. ....................... ....
......................
0o
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�lo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
QX0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
53Yes
❑ No
Waste application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
U'No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify.DWQ)
15,
Crop type ..............................................' ......INl c...................6CS.R.F...............................0 n4..s. �...............
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
Q ko
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2 NQ
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
E(TNo
19.
Is there a Iack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E No
21,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Eh o
For
Certified Facilities Only
22,
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
LD No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[�No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
F4KO
Reviewer/InspectorName��e E�h.<. " �:. , ...,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 2L.=L Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

1L'L--14--1995 15 : 2b FR
ER OUPLITY SECTO PRO P.22i02
Site Requires Lrr mediate A ttentior!
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEN>ENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: It - (Y- 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: h
Tntegratar: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: _ `��-_K971-1
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE- DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude- Longitude: _ Elevation_ _______-__meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the &kn mal Waste Lagoon have suffcient. freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour- storm event
(approximately i Foot + 7 .arches) � or No Actual Freeboard: Wit. .inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or&% Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate laud available for spray? '5'�s or No is the cover crop adequate? (S�or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS rai.nimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
vlhc animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
1-ini-mal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS &tap Blue Line'? Yes or No
Zs anirral waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
-iiTn"L- man spade devices? Yes or(!!g) if Yts, Please Explain
Ooasthi: Facility inainta-in adequate waste managernear records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray "gated on spccific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes or No
Additional
U
�ILS��OC
cc: Faciliry Asscssment Unit
S igria lure
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

RRO P.02/02
JL'L-14-1995 15:26 FROMl WATER 0UALITY SECTION TO l
Site Requires Immediate Artention
Facility No. y IQ
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAZTONS STYE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: G/ 07 , 1995
Time: cr Y.r-e S /- S Y
Farm Name/prone
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator: -..,..,,"....., _ _ phone:
On Site Representative: _ �c� _ - --- Phone:
Physical Address/Location:..:gg22c=C_ .
77
Type. of Operation: Swine k--' Poultry Cattle ,
Design Capacity: ,�2 ,. a Number of Animals on Site; ai�pJ .Z, cr;11 �
DEM Certification Number: ACE___, ___ DEM Cer ification Number: ACNEW
Latitude::_5 ` Longitude: -7 20 ' Elevation: ________Feet
Circle Yes or No
Goes the A mal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storrn event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Qr No Actual Freeboard: 3 fit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ot�& Was any erosion observed? Yes orlO
Is adequate land available for spray?6y� or No. Is the cover crop adequate? OLe�)or No
Crap(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria! 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes -or No.
100 Feet from Wells?' Yes or No
-wthe animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line S tream? Yes or Na
auixnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a LUSGS' Map Blue'Line? Yes or No
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
•�!Tnila_r man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes. Please Explain.'
Doechc facility maintain adequate waste roxiagernerit Tecords (volumes of rtianure; land applied
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'' Yes or No
-yp
Additional. Comments: T�
n J i s
r / r
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Anachmenwif Needed
f�/
TOTAL P.02

aolP 1570
ptzfPk xK0
lolah?- a;,I/rm
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
51-46
County:
Johnston
Facility Name: Sandy Ridge Pork
Certified Operator Name: Whitler Stephenson Operator Number:
16439
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1 1
N. N
16 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
9/22/2018
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
Sandy Ridge Pork Manager Phone
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
919-989-8878
10/8/2018

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 1 line m = 320.1 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 2 line m = 200.3 lb PAN
3. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
4. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
5. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
6. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 520.4lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window
8820
4
coastal bermuda
8.68
73.00
633.6
Mar -Oct
8820
3
coastal bermuda
6.61
63.00
416.4
Mar -Oct
8820
1 H1
matua
2.87
221.20
634.8
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H2
matua
2.91
225.20
655.3
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H3
matua
2.93
225.30
660.1
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H4
matua
1.17
225.20
263.5
Sep -Aug
8820
21-15
matua
3.23
235.00
759,1
Sep -Aug
8820
21-16
matua
2.28
235.00
535.8
Sep -Aug
8820
21­117
matua
1.37
235.00
322.0
Sep -Aug
8558
5H8
coastal bermuda
2.57
131.70
338.5
Mar -Oct
8558
51­19
coastal bermuda
2.64
115.00
303.6
Mar -Oct
8558
51-110
coastal bermuda
2.13
135.80
289.3
Mar -Oct
8558
5H11
coastal bermuda
2.51
130.30
327.1
Mar -Oct
8558
5H12
coastal bermuda
1.89
169.20
319.8
Mar -Oct
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 6458.8 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN -BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 520.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 6458.8 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) -5938 Ilb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to,
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit.
PoA (30 Day) 21.21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (10): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 16.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 64666 ftz
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 120925 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft3
h. current herd # 800 certified herd #1 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 84593 fts
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ®ft3
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 39783 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 155055 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I, current waste analysis dated 8/30/2018 1.16 Ibs11000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I = 320.1 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 47952 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 29890 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period• according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft3
h. current herd # 800 certified herd 91 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 8/30/2018
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
84593 ft'
ft3
29925 ft3
142766 gallons
1.16 Ibs/1000 gal.
200.3 Ibs, PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

R Ott) 01175-]
Rice 1\4�d rpo
aio?a3 Ai
CIO)e4 .
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 51-46 County: Johnston
Facility Name: Sandy Ridge Pork
Certified Operator Name: Whitley Stephenson Operator Number: 16439
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 1 1
Spillway(Y or N): N N
Level(inches): 13 _ 12
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste
10/11/2016
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
Sandy Ridge Pork Manager _ Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 11/7/2016
Facility Owner/Manager-(signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 1
line m =
420.7 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: 2
line m =
373.1 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 793.8lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT RE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
8820
4
small grain overseeed
8.68
50.00
434.0
Oct -Feb
8820
3
small grain overseeed
6.61
50.00
330.5
Oct -Feb
8820
1 H1
matua
2.87
224.00
642.9
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H2
matua
2.91
224.00
651.8
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H3
matua
2.93
224.00
656.3
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H4
matua
1.17
235.00
1275.0
Sep -Aug
8820
21-15
matua
3.23
235.00
759.1
Sep -Aug
8820
21-16
matua
2.28
235.00
535.8
Sep -Aug
8820
2H7
matua
1.37
235.00
322.0
Sep -Aug
8558
51-18
small rain overseeed
2.57
50.00
128.5
Oct -Feb
8558
5H9
small rain overseeed
2.64
50.00
132.0
Oct -Feb
8558
51-110
small grain overseeed
2.13
50.001
106.5
Oct -Feb
8558
51-111
small grain overseeed
2.51
50.00
125.5
Oct -Feb
8558
51-112
small grain overseeed
1.89
50.00
94.5
Oct -Feb
State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 5194.3 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 793.8 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

* .
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 5194.3 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -4400 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Both lagoons are now in
compliance as of 10/24/16.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

.ti
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) '
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
13.0 inches
19.0 inches
6.0 inches
64666 1ft2
241851 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft 3
h. current herd # 800 certified herd # 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
I. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/7/2016
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
84593 ft'
1 ft3
39783 ft3
155055 gallons
1.06 Ibs11000 gal.
420.7 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 12
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = TO inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 47952 fe
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 209231 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft3
h. current herd # F 800 certified herd # 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/7/2016
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
84593 ft'
�ft3
29925 ft3
142766 gallons
1.06 Ibs/1000 gal.
373.1 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

Water R esources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 28, 2016
Whitley Stephenson Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.
2080 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577-7657
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
NOD-2016-PC-0267
Sandy Ridge Pork
Permit No. AWS510046
Incident # 201600341
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Stephenson:
Director
On February 9, 2016, you notified the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Resources,
as required by General Permit AWG1000 condition III.13.e that the freeboard levels of both lagoons were
less than the minimum required by the General Permit. The liquid levels of both lagoons 1 and 2 were
reported as 18.0 inches. General Permit condition V.2 states "The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage
ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for
lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-
hour storm event plus as additional' 1 foot of structural freeboard." In this case, the minimum required is
19 inches.
The 30 Day Plan of Action was received on February 11, 2016 and you reported both lagoons back
in compliance on March 7, 2016. A Compliance Inspection of the farm on February 18, 2016 indicated
management of the waste system was in compliance with permit conditions at that time. If you have any
questions concerning this notification, you may contact Joan Schneier or me via email at
[e-mail] or [e-mail] or at [phone].
Sincerely
ickolich, L.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional
Operations Section, Division of Water Resources
cc: RRO-WQROS Files
DWR Central Files
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section
http://deq.ne.gov/about/divisions/water-resources
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

pIMSA ao*po3 q1
PfQ4 rPcelV abl11p
�? qqT p/Lj
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
51-46
County: .Johnston
Facility Name: Sandy Ridge Pork
Certified Operator Name: Whitley Stephenson Operator Number: 16439
1, Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon NamelID;
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches)i
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1 1
N N
18 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 2/1112016
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
Phone: [phone]
Date: 2/10/2016

1
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 4654.5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -4253 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and.
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
.Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit.
PoA (30 Day) 2f21100

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND10R 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1,
Structure 0: 1
line m = 212,9 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: 2
line m = 188.2 lb PAN
3,
Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
6.
Structure I D:
line m = ib PAN
n.lines I+2+3+4+5+6= 401.1lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PFRlnn nn NnT t IAT FIFLDA TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o_ tract #
p. field #
q. Crap
r, acres
S. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Vacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
8820
4
small grain overseeed
8.68
69.00
598.9
Oct -Feb
8820
3
small grain overseeed
6.61
62.00
409.8
Oct -Feb
8820
1H1
matua
2.87
170.00
487.9
Sep -Aug
8820
1 H2
matua
2.91
163.00
474.3
Sep -Aug
8820
1H3
matua
2.93
164.00
480.5
Se -Au
8820
1 H4
matua
1.17
164.00
191.9
Se -Au
8820
21-15
matua
3.23
171.00
552.3
Sep -Aug
8820
2H6
matua
2.28
172.00
392.2
Sep -Aug
8820
21-17
matua
1.37
174.00
238.4
Sep -Aug__
8558
5H8
small grain overseeed
2.57
64.00
164.5
Oct -Feb
8558
51-19
small grain overseeed
2.64
64.00
169.0
Oct -Feb
8558
5H10
small grain overseeed
2.13
75.00
159.8
Oct -Feb
8558
51-111
small grain overseeed
2.51
74,00
185.7
Oct -Feb
8558
51-1112
small grain overseeed
1.89
79.00
149.3
Oct -Feb
`State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 4654.5 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 401.1 lb. PAN
POA (30 Day) 2121/00

y L
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
t. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (1D): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr, storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) I 64666 ft'
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 40308 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 fta
h, current herd # 800 certified herd #1 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated I 1 /20/201 fi
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE. ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00
84593 ft'
l.� W
39783 W
155055 gallons
1.09 Ibs/1000 gal.
212.9 lbs. PAN

. � L
PLAN OF ACTION JPoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PANTO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure NamelIdentifier (ID). 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr, storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 1$.p inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 47952 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 29890 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage.period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft 3
h. current herd # 1 800 certified herd # B00
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 84593 ft'
certified herd # _...�_
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 29925 ft3
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 142766 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated [� 1/20/2016 1.09 Ibs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I = 188.2 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION t FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

A
NCDENR
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory
Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvada, III
Governor
Director Secretary
December 20, 2013,
3 2014
Whitley Stephenson
Sandy Ridge Pork__
2080 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield, NC 27577
--
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on
December 16, 2013. With the survey results, Curtis Barwick on your behalf requested a one year
extension of the sludge survey requirement for lagoon #1 at the Sandy Ridge Pork facility that
have higher sludge accumulation citing PED problem in the facility's surrounding area. Due to
the reason cited above, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31,
2014 for lagoon #1.
The next sludge survey for lagoon #1 at this facility should be performed before December 31,
2014. Please retain this letter and keep it with your farm records for reference. Thank you for
your attention to this matter.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Branch
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Permit File AWS510046
Curtis Barwick, 103 Country Club Cir., Clinton, NC 28328
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91 M07-64641 FAX: 91 M07-6496
Internet www.nmaterqualily oLg
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

DEN
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 19, 2010
Whitley Stephenson Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.
Sandy Ridge Pork
2080 Wilsons Mills Rd
Smithfield, NC 27577
Natural `Reso.urces
DD Freiman '.
Secretary
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on March 12,
2010 for lagoon #2 at the above referenced facility: With the survey results, you requested an
extension of the sludge survey requirement for this lagoon at the Sandy Ridge Pork. Due to the
amount of treatment volume available and the rate of sludge accumulation for the lagoon, the
Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2011 for lagoon #2.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon #2 at Sandy Ridge Pork should be performed before
December 31, 2011.
Please note that this extension is only valid for lagoon #2. Other lagoons should have a sludge
survey performed on the normal schedule, before December 31, 2010 unless an extension has
been granted separately.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
ristine D. Blanton
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS510046
1636 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, north Carolina 27699-1636 �jal1C
i o-atim 2728 Capital Blvd„ Rateigh. North Garoiina 2760; NortbCarolin a
PhonF: 919.733 322 i 1 FAX: [phone] % Customer Ser6ce� 1-877-6233 6748 p+
intemet: www.nmaterauality.arg atu nlliy
An t:aurd Oouorlwir; '� 13ttinz1t.a1/e Action Em. ioyei

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Friday, March 16, 2007
Producer: Whitley Stephenson
Farm Name: Sandy Ridge Sow Farm 51-46
2350 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield,NC 27577
Telephone # : [phone]
Type of Operation : Farrow to Weanling Swine
Number of Animals : 1600 sows design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and.to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission,
Page 1 of 9

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1600 sows X 6.1 tons waste/sows/year = 9760 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1600 sows X 5.4 Ibs PAN/sows/year = 8640 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
8820
- 1
DOGUE 0-2%
1
235
0
9.87
2319.45
SEP-AUG
8820
2
GILEAD 2-6%
1
235
0
6.89
1619.15
SEP-AUG
8820
3
GILEAD 2-6%
BP
4.7
235
0
6.61
1553.35
MAR-SEP
8820
3
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
50
0
6.61
330.5
SEP-MAY
8820
4
GILEAD 2-6%
BP
4.7
235
0
8.68
2039.8
MAR-SEP
8820
- 4
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
50
01
8.68
434
SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 8296.26
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC -to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD
SOIL TYPE &CLASS-
CROP
YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES
LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
NIACRE NIACRE
USED TIME
8558
1
GILEAD 0-2%
BP
4.7 2351
01
11.74
2758.9
MAR-SEP
1
GILEAD 4-2%
SG
1 5a
0
11.74
5$7
SEP-MAY
_855$
TOTALS:
3345.9
Indicates that this
field is being overseeded
(i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS NIUNIT
BP HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE TONS 50
SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED AC 50
M MNer MATu►k AC
Page 3 of 9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1
32.05
8,296
TABLE 2
�W11.74
3,346
TOTALS: L43.7 - 11,642
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 8,640
'BALANCE -3,002
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1408 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (Inlhr) AMT (inches)
8558
-1
GILEAD 0-2%
SG
0.35
*1
8558
1
GILEAD 0-2%
BP
0.35
*1
8820
-2
GILEAD 2-6%
WA
0.35
*1
8820
-3.-4
GILEAD 2-6%
sG
0.35
*1
8820
3.4
GILEAD 2-6%
SP
0.35
*1
682D
-1
DOGUE 0-2%
WA
0.35
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application. amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 4 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Acreages are based on irrigation designs completed in 2003 and 2007. RYE'S are based on
the old Waste Utilization Plan. Fields 1 & 2, tract 8820, are full season matua, grazed or
hayed.
Page 5 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility, It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
Page 6 of 9

other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*1 B. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for
five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Page 7 of 9

NAME OF FARM: Sandy Ridge Sow Farm 51-41
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
(we) understand that I must own or have acres to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FAMLIDWN R: hitley Stephenson
SIGNATURE: DATE: �` 1
NAME OF MANAGER 'different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Pit J/Afa,
ADDRESS (AGENCY): rd3 CcNNrgy c.L146 cl W
Clinton, NC 28328
(910) 592--qn i o
SIGNATURE: DATE:
Page 9of9

5
-TOY
Aw
i H E L r'� w
� E L ,;
H E L 2.97
: 4r3
4.2yiI
Y 4 � 1 a n +•t ' kY� .
IF
H
r
'I'
.a-Y

WETTED ACREAGE FOR
SANDY RIDGE FARM (EXISTING FIELD, NEW UNDERGROUND & LAYOUT)
PULL
TYPE
PULL LENGTH
EFFECT. WIDTH
MIDDLE ACRES
START
END
TOTAL
8
EE70
536.0
180.0
2.21
0.36
0.00
2.57
9
EE70
551.0
180.0
2.28
0.36
0.00
2.64
10
E90+
417.0
189.0
1.81
0.32
0.00
2.13
11
EE70
520.0
180.0 2.15
0.36
0.00
2.51
12
EE70
527.0
114.0 Wrd
1.38
0.36
0.15
1.89
TOTAL EFFECTIVE WETTED ACREAGE:
11.74 ACRES
NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS BASED ON GPS-GENERATED MAP BY OTHERS.
2. WETTED ACREAGE FOR START ENDS AND STOP ENDS ARE TAKEN FROM CAWMP WETTED ACREAGE
SYSTEMS TABLES FOR APPROPRIATE LANE SPACING (150' LANE SPACING & 210' WETTED DIA.)
3. ALL CALCULATIONS BASED ON 0.77" RING IN SR100 GUN AND USING CALIBRATED WETTED DIA OF 210,
Q 48 psi, 80 gpm. .
4.4" UNDERGROUND CL200 PVC AND HYDRANTS TO BE INSTALLED.
15.OPERATOR MUST TAKE PRECAUTIONS AND OBSERVE IRRIGATION EVENTS TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM
OVERAPPLICATION, SPRAY DRIFT, ETC. APPLICATION SHOULD NOT OCCUR IN OVER 5 mph WINDS
OR ON FROZEN OR SATURATED SOILS. SPRAY ARCS MUST BE ADJUSTED AS SHOWN IN PLAN
6.OPERATOR MUST VERIFY REQUIRED SETBACKS AND MARK TRAVELER LANES TO ENSURE ACCURATE APPL.
7. SYSTEM SHOULD BE CALIBRATED AND OPERATED TO DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS, OR DESIGN MUST BE
MODIFIF❑ TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES:
CALCULATIONS BY: R. Gregory Swain, P.E.
Swain Consulting Services, Inc.
503 Underwood St
Clinton, NC 28328
[phone]
�.• o�ESSO
SEAL
16415
0 % 'GIN
c
••.N

�Po
pd yam"
i
` "WELD
_- - I
Existi -g PVC Und
erground
v12
L
New14" C 00 PVC
0°, 1\5
'
5
150' Lane
Spacing
m �
NOTES:
1. IRRIGATMON LAYOUT BASED ON MAPPING BY OTHERS
2. LAYOUT AND SPACING BASED ON 0.77' RING OPERATED O 48 psi, AND USING
CAUBRATED PERFORMANCE WETTED DW-21O', LANE SPACING
150' FOR 71S [AN€ SPACING.
3. OPERATOR MUST MANAGE APPLICATIONS TO REMAIN IN ACM CROP AREAS.
NO LAID APPUCATION DURING RAINFALL, FROZEN GROUND, DR WIND > 5 mph.
LEGEND
210' DIA.
SPRAY PATTERN
O NEW HYDRANT
r THRUST BLOCK
i AIR VENT
TRAVEL LANE
-- -- --- — DITCH, SURFACE WATER
— -- — FIELD BORDER
— — — — BUFFER OR SETBACK
SEAL
16415
SWAIN CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
150 CABIN CREEK LN. CLINTON, NC
910-590-2703
Sandy Ridge Farm I
lrrig Design— —Existing Fld
DATE: 2/6/07 1 SCALE: 1" = 200'

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Cadman 3" w1600' hose
Field No. Travel Application TRAVEL LANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
and Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
Hvdrant No. (ftlmin) (in/hr.) Width(ft.) Lenath(ft) (feet) (Inches) at Gun(Dsi) at reel(Dsi) Pattern Comments - Acres ner null
Cr' �'a■w��t�
i�''
a'���r
f

Sheets
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Whitley Stephenson
Address: 2350 Wilson Mills Rd.
Smithfield, NC 27577
Telephone: [phone]
Table 1 - Field Specifications .
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Field of Field
Number (acres)
Soil TVAe Slooe % Crop(s)
County: Johnston
Date: 04101 /2003
Maximum
Maximum
Application
Application
per Irrigation
Rate
Cycle
(Inlhr)
(inches) Comments
'Hydrants
16-32

"0,+4G8 Acres
Bentonville Farm.
Scale: 1 "=300'
Hog Houses
aQ)
Lagoon
0a
Qom
M
f-1cld Y
x'
06
V
.nar .n..i
'7 r

SPRING MEADOW FARMS
2080 WILSON MILLS ROAD
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
March 27, 2007
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Sir or Madam;
Please find enclosed updated Waste Utilization Plans for Spring Meadow Farms Unit 1 (5141)
and Sandy Ridge Pork (51-46). A new irrigation system is being installed on fields 8 and 8A at
Spring Meadow Farms Unit 1. A new irrigation system is being installed on field 1, tract 8558, at
Sandy Ridge Pork.
If you need further information regarding this, please call Whitley Stephenson at (919) 989-
8878. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Curtis Barwick
Technical Specialist
I
RZ 6z�w Ill

August 19, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7002 2410 0003 0274 7027
Whitley Stephenson
Sandy Ridge Pork
2080 Wilson Mills Rd.
Smithfield, NC 27577
RE: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Facility # 51-46
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Itl
1
r
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your request for a sludge survey
extension on July 25, 2005. Due to the amount of treatment volume available, DWQ agrees that
a sludge survey is not needed until 2009.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File# 51-46
John Hunt, Raleigh Regional Office
One rCaina
urura
�ly
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Whitley Stephenson
2080 Wilson's Mills Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
June 28, 2005
Enclosed is a copy of recent changes made to the waste plan for farm #51-46. I am
unsure if these changes are revisions or amendments so I have sent your office a copy to
be on the safe side.
Owner, Sandy Ridge Pork

PRODUCER:
LOCATION:
TELEPHONE:
TYPE OPERATION:
NUMBER OF ANIMALS:
(Design Capacity)
'`W/1S E-lJT'LIZ/ "�j` N LOW "MIy" i W' � 11
Whitley Stephenson - Bentonville Farm
2350 Wilson Mills Rd.
Smithfield, NC 27577
[phone]
Farrow -wean
1600
JUL6 2005 ,y
off i11'.
�D�hNR RALEI� REv1g��,. _.
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in .runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility, Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft, tons. etc.)
1,600 animals X 6_1 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,600 animals X 5_4 lbs. PAN/animal/year =
Guide Std. 633)
9,760 (tons) waste/year.
8,640 lbs. PANlyear. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvpe Per Acre Utilized Application
T8820
1
DoA
Matua G
2351
9.87
2319.45
Sept. - August
T8820
2
GeB
Matua G
235
6.89
1619.15
Sept. - August
T8820
3
GeB
Bermuda G
235
6.61
1553.35
March - Sept.
T8820
--3
GeB
Small Grain H
50
6.61
330.5
Sept. - April
T8820
4
GeB
Bermuda G
235
8.68
2039.8
March - Sept.
T8820
-4
GeB
Matua Overseed
50
8.68
434
Sept, - A ril
Total 1 32.051 8,296.25 1
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 21j
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Acre* Utilized Application
Leased
5
GeB
Corn
110
6.50
715
March - June
Wheat
96
6.50
624
Sept. - April
Soybeans
120
6.50
780
April - August
Small Grain
50
6.50
325
Sept. - April
Cotton
75
6.50
487.5
April - Jul
Millet
120
6.50
780
April - Sept.
Bermuda G
235
6.50
1527.5
March - Sept.
Matua G - full season
235
6.50
1527.5
Aug. - Jul
OPTIONAL LAND - any crop may
be used
*either wheat, soybeans, millet, corn, or cotton must be grown each
G - grazed
1year
* See footnote for Table 1.
Total
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 32.05 8,296
Table 2 6.50 624
Total 38.55 8,920
Amount of N Produced 8,640
Surplus or Deficit 280
I 624.00
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Field Soil Type
No.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Crop Application Application
Rate (InlHr) Amount (In.)
1
DoA
Matua
0.3
.5-1
2-4
GeB
Bermuda/Matua
0.35
.5-1
5
GeB
Row Crops
0.35
.5-1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation:
Fields 1 and 2 are full season matua. It may be grazed or cut for ha
Fields 3 and 4 must be cut for hay. Small grain on Feld 3 requires that application windows shown be
followed, and it must be removed by April 15, _
50# rate for overseed may be used for field 3, with revised application windows as shown for.
field 4.
Field 1 will be in millet during the Spring/Summer of 2003 only. Matua will be Planted in the Fall
of 2003. Millet rate is 120 lbs. of PAN/ acre, with an application window of April - Sept.
Field 5 added to the plan as optional, leased land. Any crop listed may be used. SB515
setbacks apply to this field. At a minimum, either corn, so beans, wheat, cotton, or millet
must be grown each year to balance the plan.
Page 4

VT
II " t ° VSiAST' °l T
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

INAgT ?1ILI� T Ii]N P
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

r�. �+t t�+ !#5S'yk?p
L�_ ```
s. ,w�
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Bentonville Farm
Owner/ Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Whitley Stephenson
(Please print)
Signature: V Date: `
4
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Kraig Westerbeek
Affiliation: Private
Address (Agency): 1635 W. Wards Bridge Rd.
Signature:
Warsaw, NC 2839
Date: a C-)r
Page 8

tMAL WASTE IUTIL.IZMIQN AGREEMEN:[
(Needed only if adddona! (end has to be leased, etc.)
i, 1 L� Q , hereby giveA I,- I, 1_1��w
permission to appf animal waste from his Waste Utilizat n Sy tern on acres
of.my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that thls waste contalns nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also
understand that the use of waste will reduce my needed for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landown r: Date:
Waste Producer Date: AA
Technical Representative:
Date:
SIIUCD Represen a v , ` Date
Tenn of Agreement:
`1` ,19 to 2fl
(M(n(mum of Ten yeera on Cost Shared Items)
(see Requkvd SpedAcadon No. 2)
Page 9

o f W A rFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
CA, Q - William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.
Sandy Ridge Pork
2350 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
- Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 24, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Whitley
Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510046 which expires October 1,
2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Sandy Ridge Pork, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 1600 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Cenler, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
,Vaturjally

Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record kee in
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510046
APS Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.
Sandy Ridge Pork
2350 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfieid NC 27577
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 24, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Whitley
Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWGI00000. The issuance of
this COC supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510046 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Sandy Ridge Pork, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 1600 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean .or .
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. M
MENER
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. .
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the..staff member.... listed. -below --for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWGI00000)
CC' (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department _. . .
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation- District
Permit File AWS510046
NDPU Files

'i ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
WHITLEY STEPHENSON
2350 WILSON MILLS ROAD
SMITHFIELD NC 27577
919-934-2109
Existing Farrow to Weanling Swine
1600.00 sows
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to Land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the -waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1600 sows x 6.1 tons waste/sows/year = 9760 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1600 sows x 5.4 lbs PAN/sows/year = 8640 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
z
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM Ni**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
------
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
8820
1
GeB
BH
5.5
275
0
5.6
1540
I
APR.SEP
8820
SG
1-1
lGeB
12
1100
10
15.6
1560 AR
8820
2
BH
5.5
0
jGeB
li
I
�275
16.69
11839.75
APR.SEP
8820
SG
2
0
1-2
jGe13
I
1100
16.69
1669
OCT.MAR
8820
3
DOA
7.08
IC
I
1125.01136.2510
I
1964.65
MAR-JUN
8820
0
1-3
jDoA
JW
I
160.0
�144
17.08
11019.52
OCT.MAR
'9'
/ 5:N) r Ito 5'
8820
1-3
jDoA
SB
38
1 2
0
I
17.08
11076.16
JUN.SEP
8820
4
jGeB
BH
5.5
0
I
1275
13.61
1992.75
MAR.SEP
8$20
�-4
jGeB
SG
2
0
I
1100
13.61
1361
OCT.MAR
8820
5
lGell
BH
5.5
0
1948,75
I
I
1275
1:3.45
IMAR.SEP
8820
1-5
jGeB
SG
2
d
I
1100
13.45
1345
OCT.MAR
END
I
d 7
TOTAL I -kV_ Tr--S
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
V - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
or
---------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annualsQ/r G,pa%o
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small. grain, etc, is LG be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AWN (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.09
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
26.43
8 7 fs
0
0
26.43
.5
* BALANCE
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1408 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 7040
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 23.4666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 1--)G.32 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
I
l Field [
Soil Type
i
[ Crop
8820
I I
l 1 l
GeB
I BH
8820
I I
l 2 l
GeB
I BH
8820
I I
1 3 l
I
DoA
l C
8820
1
[ 4 I
GeB
I BH
8820
15 [
GeB
I BH
8820
i
I -1 I
GeB
I SG
8820
1
I -2 l
GeB
l SG
8820
l -3
l DOA
8820
I -3
1
l DOA
8820
l -4
.I
I GeB
SB
W
SG
Application RatelApplic. Amount
,(in/hr) [ (inches)
0.35
I
l 0.35
I
l 0.3
0.35
[ 0.35
[ 0.35
I
l 0.35
I
[ 0.3
I
I 0.3
0.35
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
18820 I V5 1 GeB
SG I 0.35
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be'removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
(il � a /6s .✓ � r.�'Gc-c-�' ��;""�� �E�/,�" s y:a cries .
% 6� 5ay3 / /ELd i"�rrc•ira,✓ � izti. ac i cE C.ti'!i'
��-� 3.9.s� L3.� c� u,• -� � : �n�,� , s i-;..� .� ; �v� yam• -ter- �n-�r-��E--,
(31 THE .rl�,- /� /
/ �s� ��� p;✓4.Y �jrv�'c_y k/.�s7'E "- / �N ��? T"Hrs� C./�c'.d i /t�StT /S.
/�) / 4 t'�63 %�� v/✓ S,-�.4a-c, U-���✓ v:�'S ���ac-�, , j,a G � u �7` .�,<.�rc .s.4-�y c di= � h'�
l .e r �o rL 7
J-'lEZO 'd�'` s•4�c �n'�..-� /�-c�'s' v � �3' �5z• 'P
.✓ !-/�Tr-c'✓rt! /�l�i S i 3k� Ti�� F,v�P f/�:��° U.'��c�°��7r''y.
/1?ft/✓Aa-/i✓T.' L / q r� e/i L [c-7lEL 5 /
c,y�lfE vl T � ,¢�o.rr✓� ���� T/�E EFA Tv
,��L✓11/rlt�►✓O Tri%%�'/ 1/U4 r3�r�ii✓ /�'•r.if%..rir C✓rfCi✓ i �'4.0.''9���.ySi7J/�/�� /✓� %�T d%Q /11s'7�ja
♦� �LSrJ �GZ.M lll�7✓C! %'r�'� %/J'fC L�°�"�✓
ode... ,✓ Tz/ Tffc
''y!I`$l'X,/rl u /N 5' !"�.P�~ G �✓''t TIfC-� 6ul .v 7'Z�%1' ril c'.✓ T^/w S, ,ll/�S/.5 S �I /.`"�Y�L.<: .�-s•?
C �/����-*a __�di'�f'�"%4' - Y� IF+i;.vT-�' rlyd. r"T/t-� tl.r� :ZJ �'i•c',{' Ey,�f's;4:�Tc✓� h�T
S'Oi[- Goyt7l7-jr.✓f /= p�'���✓ err« C` -C .
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1.. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility,to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
T
5. Odors can be reduced by i►ijecrLiny Lhe waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. when animal waste is to be applied on acres subject .to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a disc barge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pII shall be adjuGLed for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
.'f
Name of Farm:SPRING MEADOW (BENTONVILLE FARM)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be -filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: W ITLEY STEPHENSON
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(z(different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Kenneth York
Affil.iation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989--5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: T r G Date:
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
IM
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Term of Agreement:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
19— to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 16

North Caroms State Universlty Is a W6 Department of Crop Science
VW university and a constnuanl institution
of The UrOvemly d North Carolina
Callege of AWtulture and UG Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NO 27695-7620
019,616.2647
919.616,7959 (tax)
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The oast
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda Qrior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acreofPlant Available N (PAN) may be applied between Se tember 15
and OctobEr-W.'additional acre o P may be 1plied in February -March. If rye
growth is harvested on tune and does not sign scantly shade the Bermuda, PAN -rates for the
subsequent Bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior
to heading or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading Bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 Ibs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary- because ryegrass growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the Bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

P�Aw 3M1i1' t k N r�' �}. t1 R rD,tjDl (jL :.« yt,Iy;[r`rC+
✓+ . .-4444��1:i � ! �a. Ra` � I M��', ' �''• . Cj' �+.�csT. l xr. }P{• t �
.. 7 �rtR r �i * .� vF.1:,. r r Fk� ■ ,y r 1 � .. 7.1j �r
I nil •i1110 �. y 1 F,: t�'''[$ Y%LL. u'>r �"itt l' 0.' 1 i - ¢i• �A �{T�J�A�' ��•• 1�ai r"..
'1 is rf ^eW. ' ► f '�#}� '�'ld'4'TI +!•, it ', - • ' 3 'yQ' r \ti ��., �j 11�ri�',-3`4 �'i7� _ /...
vy
Tubs•��
> •,r � •7,1 :II dt �Yl�.*I.r� �, iy��t1 •' `,�;•��'1.<M•.... !� t44, i 1H�-J �'�3 �. .� 1������$.��� .
i 6t+ FS100
$it te7�1, kig ti •:;'1 I t �':;� , ~ tir ' r
ka3 'a''10. •,; ' �► ' i'sso rrI b
'•' _ _- ^�S-i Z ' r�. �tr:S - ',1 '1-I�
Ia
TI{ODF,�yoi•,.,
E T6,
�-•�. t � r'{��: `-i` ` � i}° -1r1oo8� Tloodo '_,�i�� - 3,,� j'' t -,";'~ ^ �y � i.•
;, a1l�M ��1�' T5ti3 ,�` a. i ,■ '�X E' 1�'�,•� E ��t t ,�r q4'i �► �{,s�l'�a Y 1 :� }��.+ °'f,,
{rl �t�il f .�. w JC � 1" �1 •`5t T •rY S � - . t 1
r }�• , T2�iY y,�;i. .-�f, li`� WI � l..r .t',� I `• ..t •'. jt*�5,k - S 4 � 4��iZdj°� •!1 -st
�iy� - i 'f*', in.,l�j►Af j f i •' 7!'�',. L 5� � 1 T � ''.�1 �4 {I i3�rl. - +- , •1"'�, ` .,irk,��•�' 9, ,r$M
i to •a �"a� � �i'1 �I� ���
ix) .Y +� ��
yj `a r�11 its
Apt :Il1+A � ' � }� rN(jf r� � yj l +,i �• 1�i4Ir .� . ,y t�y . tr• tea• i
�' i. ,
jF d �. I "' c •'", tC'7`7! -.�� '[ j ire r P, :;:
jA
t•�,`.k,k+l:z' �' rG f+''i; '# },?7� id '� y rF.,A �.'-� ' Y'j i,y'.'�,5� T S•9� Ist�thnl 7'r�i; 1 i.:�il Y€It nr 3 k+k�r'.
a _ `.�" , •y� 7T P !'l� � V-:: UU„"":.� `Ri'1' 1 r r _ _ 1,,� � � i .a l -
'1 f , # '�•.. i t3 '� �r y ! � 7' rr y •�r+at a r t ?r'�"' t L�" a :., r
TrDb�'�
I 31 57rj, h$ q6 r'( I.4
k �+rx'7i�(S_•.�'i" Ih P. � (�t a � ; r�3,1' � f`1,���j�•. qiR• 1�� !d ��� �. t�`. �J '�Y�,• {� �r�'�,���� -
wr`�.�5 r4 ,.f Jj ���1�. A. 7 r^•3 .� F1p�e +.~,+� 1 1'�.11j��, .>�4.'.r tL. Y'•� � "j�, ��'VP4
y.,r� 1 '- N 'fir r.� , r 3t ) •G -�k;. � 5 „ s � � 7At N � .1 s,_ °N'_,' �,. •�. � r •
IV F. x 15`! \ 4, M �\ 11 MJ�f[y�}y 1I y r 'f • �l ""
rr�t • t '�' � 1��' �� ! - 1' 1 i :, 1,� � F�' tl e��,l � t�r T � �+� ,•�� 4 S� Aa � ,, F /r� t.
x,i �r + z ��,� �r � cf �Ji,�1 �yg /y I � +i *r ir' �� 1 [{� � �i 3;4'i rl'��F•1 ( � 3 -F� x ��d �a •t r' •�
.t,! r7.yt f' ^•ii!+i1Q.w�FR:' 1'- r 1'IM( 'h. y }1. ,_ !! -i.,• - rAh r I `
•,��t� ;, Yt i� i;t'�4�+llf!'� ;��{ �i,l� 4'�}, +�.,1 j.• F3r�, �+,� w /, hil,'JA + ,�i�tl•.� •'`M:.I;�f 1 �1�1�"• :, '1
ft :1�i i ��� t �^i[ 1, r 'E i`.�+2 � t 'I{� �4D�r.3 'f' �.e i `I'ti' ��ti.r ; �-13 •,t : i.;.
�yor�} �t,�.,,�iFt ����' 2(3,IR� �;h G1•"�'Sr �k�r '.'a ° HV' ���y-� .:, `!; k6Lr�rs- ��� {}
�+ ! r ';f�?.• 1 ,_i(r��b'`+ 1 ^!h l,' � � r4 r ,''"•' 7 -.'
f31��•r a - �,-i! t, 4 n j-+��' �� " ',./; t •5i
r - IS ,� L,•.
.4'.r'-T$� •''a' +� i"1:
YJ.#1. •^^ l li AJ 'li�`'I } F -. a � v"'f , %t 'C r _,� _ • ,... _ . � i'"`,'1 1' � fFl.
K ti S! 1 1 jv'l% S'�iS�T{ ��.�A1 ^ �,1� � � . � �;e�ll:G#t_ .. _
y57.r,� i 1 i''`t'.1 r♦' t .JI "f' ' {,.- .'��t.#S11.d .�� S-'�,r 1 4 ;:.It _ � _ .. ..6:r 1 .y• flit 4
"}"i— { t'L'y
,� d , ^ > . `� '#�,{ :`� , ti� t�,`F��-Itl�i�``" �}�,,,rr� -. c+77 �'-� •r r r j#k4 f fa
1 t � tiit 1 ♦:� fc�� F•','- r{{• ••'�^ ' -j' - 5 �• .
1 5 L Yytr• � 1 V
T11 Now � �• 1 ,��y�r � - j~��•`�+
#., t, + fl it `lei F to F`•rry
hr'Tn' r Llf_ ,.. !r {?•'^�� ` 1 �' ••�: i
x # tt14 t.,l 1 ' .e_ i .F.L�•' r rY
ehb1,r�1. �5�+t?$'1'.* lEL r_ 1 1_�
- �' `�y iiJ F��:
` ei �. '•irr�'�?,i�Sr•....r
t, 3Ir r,.� { ynKa✓•;'p'
trite � �h h h 1��i'k ':�fi i+ +..,,�e #,�-. �l'r � k,'!'J .� �:' S f p, �lri �..�„° •i- �y[
y�!�ryr�s�{4;`M,.1` �i"-''li r { � } 7�11'� �/t�tA��,7+y'rh ,t, i,�. s% • 1 2 ]y- �y{�.�� 1 r :.?
ki��1�}-tij>, T; f'h.t�i�'�i •5°VI�1'A�. 1 _ ry s>I 'I.rC %�nJ15 ll. ti' 2"TTy tr"I ( r::.{r `Y4 Ir , P� • C��M"'r�l - 11 $ jl;i• '
A „ GPM
•erf lFr } s _ +� 'rl� ; k,� L„�c rltil. tX t•, .3 Lr �j / t' wv ,! r-<7 ik t it f
� r F v 'T' �r - 1 r +� 11 f dth; �� �� ?;i �., 1.:' I.,N yftx i I ' i r �{4 {I i •
- 'ti 'r,>wx •!"� .�. *d it ;� a rt +rf� i' IY.•rl7 � '�{ , i'1`: �. F' 1 i1 {.r
t �} k � 1 -S � r •,, C,- i }�'rs�•Jf? ,t/' , r rt(,�r. r ,•ri r,� 1,;,T•', {,�f?;i r1YAlry�t�E- � J e.• _•.
Fry.-
1 � ! .�i 1.� r rI ' ' f r t t 4f. w f -�5{`t .yam i- ,r f i .`y�� rirY� y,,1, x � Yf�WW �� r; 1 , �• r ' f y�37 iI ,
'S. Lti.F1•'A� J� ' r 5 ' S, 'i3f �'�' T 7 I< vv11'/i i'�• ¢I++',,L,,,,rFf :7. �.� �li .� u.�V .� all .1�?]4
�rr- J 7-t`^1t-.,,f r A r �!.e a1./'i �' o-.i .>-ir>~• ;: t -i^ 4
y�JLr 3 ;. �'t, lw 1,. �yy, t� •�lr Ht � ��Y> !'�i�',��i u,r.,. ply ES r„,�Fnk .� L�.i'f-,y r'�� Y: 3!1.�: �1*1
A'A!}"�•s}y�',h a S'�'-�r�7�aa �' �7}+�` � i �- �1a ^ • IF'r: F, - i i•+g�ff(r:.� i - ��� 7F,
'E�
;1�F;�'�'1��'Y''� Z .�F[ ,fir T 5 s� `� ' �r, ;'jr, L:. 1 d •7r, ' i rt it • d �. h yL`r� iv 17,
R r3 ,�•' � �� �.��Fj,.�^� 1 � �� r i s S �SJ*,,�3,! � � i - `F 1, i(r. . , '9 71��F,I,{•. r�.( 'r'� ; . .3.;' .! I
`'?,:- m`#.i,rkt�*+'r`"A�?e i "t*-' s^ Yfjtr t M 1 rfi.-�•�., 1 Jd., ,x.y -�7,.
t,, � � �r , y�•„ "M 'a ':�� .t`%'� t �s;Fl r � Ir, , � � � ,•`�'I�a rti, sK•�•+�` r 3 � 7 �,� � � -.1, � :£,I . r�.
" Y � 1 .�' t '� t• r a i 3
��I .���� s �Iri t +4�tT- �•'�..?"E"1 ��.��"'!y`�. 1r!)t"4 FK'tt�'t.-: Ft�' " ...T1'C���`�
+-'�!.•.^,^,. ^h�,.. f,..,.. M 1�.#'Itj�„ .���'FY.� r .. � . ,: ,i„k. .i5 -_1... ,'P - +- - K1r� •'i ...._i�••-i:l�L'•• '

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility:-'ti'�����x+� ��f� ���'`'"L acility Number: S1
Owner(s) Name: h//-1177-&-y _Phone No:!719- 93V-�/U j
Mailing Address:
fVC eg 75-717
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre, Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization. Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any futuremodifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and. filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner N
Owner Signature:
Date:
Technical Specialist Name: , G+rP
Technical Specialist Signature: Date:
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards.' Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to MRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature:
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
16I7 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NVADC - 7199
Date:

"-,V E -1; A I•b 6?-7 3 - �o -c,&
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN �-C*
WHITLEY STEPHENSON
2350 WILSON MILLS ROAD
SMITHFIELD NC 27577
919-934-2109
Type Operation:
Existing Farrow
to Weanling Swine
-._-
Number of Animals:
1600.00 sows
(Design Capacity)
�v
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
Anaerobic Waste
Treatment Lagoon;;'
...
APPLICATION METHOD:
Irrigation+r
N�1
The waste from your
animal facility must
be land applied at -a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1600 sows x 6.1 tons waste/sows/year = 9760 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1600 sows x 5.4 lbs PAN/sows/year = 8640 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the.above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
8820
1
DoA
C
125.0
136.25
20
8.20
1117.25
I
MAR-JUN
8820
60.0
8.20
1-1
IDOA
iw
II
1144
10
FE80.8d
-MAR
r
,.
8820 1
SB
38
152
8.20
11246.4
IDOA
T
IAPR.SEP.15
8820 2
BH
5.50
50
11237.5
lGeB
I
1275
10- 14.
IMAR.00T.15
8820
SG
2
1450
1-2
lGeB
T
lioo
lb 14.50
ISEP.MAY.
8820 3A
GeB
BH
5.50
0
J495
T
1275
11.80
IMAR.00T15
8820 -3A
SG
2
100
0
1.80
1180
jGeB
I
ISEP.MAY.
8820 3
BH
5.5
0
13080
jGeB
I
1275
111.2
IMAR.00T.15
8820
SG
2
0
11.20
1120
1-3
lGeB
I
1100
ISEP.MAY.
8820 5
BH
5.5
275
0
1.$
1495
jGeB
I
IMAR.00T.15
8820 --5
lGeB
ISG
12
1100
10 11.80
1180
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I
ISEP.MAY.
8820 7
5.50
0
11237.5
jGeB
JBH
I
1275
14.50
IMAR.00T.15
8820
SG
2
0
1450
1-7
jGeB
I
1100
14.50
ISEP.MAY.
,
8820 8
BH
5.50
0
1495
jGeB
I
1275
11.80
IMAR.00T.15
8820
SG
2
0
1180
1-8
jGeB
I
1100
11.80
ISEP.MAY.
8820 9
BH
5.50
0
1577.5
jGeB
I
1275
12-10
IMAR.00T.15
8820
SG
2
0
2.10
1210
1-9
jGeB
i
1100
ISEP.MAY.
END
I
TOTAL 113�3- ,9
IVSq, 7
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted)-, r winter annuals follow summer annuals.
O►' L'r© ro Ip �loqs
NOTE: PP
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
---
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
- Indicates that this field -is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals fo low summer annuals.
©r' e roP )-, JA77,0.
In inter:+planted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.40
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
35.9
1-13 9 9-IV4&
0
0
35.9
1-34 31-9
* BALANCE
529 .95
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1408 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 7040
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 23.4666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 56.32 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
f Field
Soil Type
' crop-
(in/hr)
(inches)
8820
11 I
DoA
I C
.30
*1
8820
2
GeB
BH
.35
*1
8820
3
GeB
BH
.35
*1
8820
3A
GeB
BH
.35
*1
8820
5
GeB
f BH
i .35
*1
8820
7
GeB
BH
.35
*1
8820 j
8 I
GeB
BH
I .35
*1
8820
9
GeB
BH
.35
*1
8820
-1 I
DoA
+ SB
I .30
*1
8820
-1
DoA
W
.30
j *1
Page: a

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1
1 1
1 SG I
I GeB
8820
1 -2
8820
1
1 -3
!
I l
1 SG
1 GeB
8820
1 -3A
I
1 SG 1
I GeB
8820
1 -5
1 SG
1 GeB
8820
--7
1
1 SG
I GeB
8820
I
-8
I
I SG 1
1 GeB
8820
1
1 -9
I
1 1
1 SG 1
1 GeB
.35
.35
.35
.35
.35
.35
.35
*1
*1
*1
*1
*1
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
1'y NARRATIVE OF OPERATIOe4 ;v 1- e ck e- /-j �1'b ol
o li
3� le-
J �
AM
� y
y Oct JAI K :5 /
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED_ SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or.by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:SANDY RIDGE PORK
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: WHITLEY STEPHENSON
(Please print) `� l
Signature: i Date: d'1
Name of Manager(I different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. Smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: Date:���`�L/
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement:
, 19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Term of Agreement:
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
Date:
to
a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
( SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 17

North Caroltm slate university is a mho- Department of Crop Science
grant ur riersNy and a cowiluerd Ir ddLdlon
of The U*ersily of North Carolina
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695.7620
919.515.2647
019.515.7958 (fax)
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bernwdagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda. prior to August 31._ An
application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be ap lied between Se tember 15
an to er30. Ann additional 5 acre o PAN may be a pli in February -March. If rye
growth is harvested on time an does not significantly s e the bermuda, PAN -rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required ptior
to heading or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with Bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye. must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inches tall) berm'udagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the Bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary, because ryegrass growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time Bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the Bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required wblln the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

To 4t
13
AV
3.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.
Sandy Ridge Pork
2350 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
Dear Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm, Inc.:
4 IT
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRcEs
December 30, 1999
rZ
f�
r ..,,,t j 4;
�R RAI
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping Fict
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 5,1,746,
Johnston County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, iRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
r
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

JAN 06 100 03:14PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX P.3/4
'ge'.t cv7 c-t ,
Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through, March 31, 20(
1. If this facility can comply with its existinn permit and CAWYIP it must do so.
---- 2. Temporary AdditiorLo6Ncw SprAyf (Y) (Chcck appropriate b xcs.)
[J A. ��acres of cropland. List crop types used; T _ -
f] B. U acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
(J C. =acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN I acre added_
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropri to box.)
[] A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killintr frost.
l] B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to (teacres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grzssr� to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
[J A. PAN application 'increased up to 200 lbs per acrz iur acres of small grains or wmLer grasses to be harvests
[] B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre forhaw acres of oversecdcd summer perennial included in 3.
5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
[J A. Prior to December 1", 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35170 reduction of the last analysis taken
prior Lathe first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Currant waste analysis must be uscd aft.-r Dec.I" .)
. Use current waste analysis to deurrninc P,&N.
6. Required - Maximum Nitroeen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and 'vVintcr Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates.
B. Timely harvest of fora-c to iocrcasc yield, ant
C. L-rigatina during periods of warrn:r wcathc.-.
7. Reouired - Irrigation Mangemrnt Techniqu--s to Reduce Runnff , nd Ponding Pat^ -mist.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications. and
B. Not irrigating immdlaic]y b.-forc predicted rainfall.
S. The owner / manager is required to mana_c the mo-crnent of animals to and from the facility to minimize cnvironmcn
impacts, crsure compiiancc'-Vith rite Cacilit�''s permit and arnendcd CAWNIP. and at'oid _is;:har,c to surftce w:ztcrs.
9. Authorization to use the'additional pra_:; :cs in this amcndmcnt exair.s if a faeai_c dis;haraes to surface tvau
Any discharg: is a violation and ma%, result in an eniorcerncnt action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep rc.-ords of ail %Vzitc applications.
11. This revision must include a ;nap or sketch of n.u` land application areas.
Facility Number
� \ Facility Naar_
Facili y Ow 'r / Inacer Namc (PRTNT) Technical Special' Name PRIN I')
i �Tlll� n r
Faciliay,Owncr / N62-cr Signature: Technical Spz iaiist Signature
r
Date ��-\ _ _ _ Date -•z
'��
This document must he filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWINIP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
Ncw temporary sprzy ieWs must meet applicntsle 'puffer and setback rcquircrn,-nLS. t;'::,te muS1 nt,t be applied to wctlstnds:
1 I/12J199Y

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary p E H N F=?k
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 8, 1997
Whitley Stephenson
Sandy Ridge Pork
2350 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
In accordance with your application received on August 28, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 51-46, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system -in accordance with the State's General Permit
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the Sandy Ridge Pork Farm, located in Johnston County, with'an
animal capacity of no greater than 1600 Farrow to Wean and the application to a minimum of 48.96 acres
of land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from -the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of .
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may -result in the revocation of this COC.-
Upon notification by the'.Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWO.prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina.27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the . engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
rRaleighRegional"Office;-Water Quality Section,
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
Uu �6�� r�
s� � o �s� lUi

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number - q C. Operation is flagged fora wettable
Farm Name: U,3oU ►Q0(;E fcw- acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: wg � r-Lc,� Part 1l eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3
Inspector/Reviewer's Name ,4 AX j` T-
Date of site visit -
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: ?_ Annual farm PAN deficit: S pounds
Ir igation System(s) - circl . 1: and -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
tationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6 stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D)D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part it - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III). -
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number S)
Part lll. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
'r)?,4,t.c-(--
II_ 13
! 1. 13
Z
b_2(
G • -Z
3 A-
1
iJL-r i4t+- a� (�i�i.D USAd
5�_
-�
_Q7
L(
Z -5 Y
,tea
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER Z - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS3 - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date: /1 r7 /tS
Waste Utilization Plan; Date:' 4frolzed/used4*.
Amount of plant available nitrogen annually ( 13 7%3 7 Ibs)
Dominant soil series: �D, Gig
Crops to be grown: �.-�.rw+ sue-, �,r� e.�•.�Q�� aa� s
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= )
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1/93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
^T, Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Type of irrigation: T v un of -Se ma Gu Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1 /96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1 /96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
REQ ED RECORDS effective 9/1 /96 PERM D FACILITIES
Waste application records IRR 1 &2 eral Permit & COC on site
PP ( }
3r�a[ Annual soil sample reports for 1999 weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index: 37 — rr c )
(Zn index: ?a - -09 _)
Waste analysis - date last taken iZ r 7(9
(, 2 PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structu a #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2

FACILITY NUMBER ( - Jb
FARM NAME: sAt4�s>y Dcr dzq�
REVIEWER: A -
DATE: F ZA 4,
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN
POND -PAN
FarrowAlVean
CE:> sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
it
head
1=
I
3.7=
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS:
fJaF alts S`nr
Top of dike elevation:
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume W
Temporary storage volume W
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi):
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design .
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage: i8D
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
ft. 1 ' 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. 2"d 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard in.
ft.
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
.5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

PRICE POWER
Rt. 3, Box 486
SR 1003 (Buffaloe Rd.)
SmitlifieId, NC 27577
(MOBILE) 919-965-0833
[phone] FAX [phone]
S�E�i{t>1�lSoN F40G-
TRR�G�naa
0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
Whitley Stephenson.
Sandy Ridge Pork
2350 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on September 8, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we
are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Whitley Stephenson, authorizing the operation of
the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Sandy Ridge Pork, located in Johnston County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 1600 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS510046 dated September 8, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditibns of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition I1.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition 11I.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition 11I.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510046
Sandy Ridge Pork
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for A. res on oward, Jr.,
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources �O
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please_,
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
u�
;v
Application Date:
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each'
item. ,
Armlicants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name:
2. Print Land Owner's name: Whitley Stephenson
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: 2350 Wilson Mills R
City: Smithfield NO_ Zip: 27577
Telephone Number: 4-
4. County where farm is located: Johnston _
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 2 miles south of Junction of Joyner's l3n ge Road and
Strickland's — Crossroads in lhe Bentonville Community.
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): `\to,( hfMA '
7. Lessee's / Integrator' name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
51 - 46
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1, Farm No.: 51-46
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Wean
1600 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? M yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tvoe of Swine No. of Animals 'Tyne of Poultry No of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Turkey
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: _ No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 95 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):
4. Number of Lagoons: fN 6, ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES or (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
(Land Owners name listed in question II.2), attest that
this application for �a _ N EV\ _ . (Farm name listed in question II.1)
has been reviewed by me and is acc ate Ad complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomolett:.
Signature
V . MANAGER
I, 1� 0_t41s.4_
Date Vk ��
CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question I1.6), attest that this
application for _ 1 .l �A, 140,2 U4r`p- (Farm name listed in question ILI)
has been reviewed by me and is ac rate and Anplete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
THE
Date
APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26197 Page 2 of 3

UNITED STATES 1-O"J' Ajc 78' zoo ZS
' DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR � �` � d
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
35° 22730 2�' 30' t39" E 7 M1 Ta dYTF M rr 05' 740 741 742 20'
C , % ITS mi
to '� �'•'! I
3170maN
G
gm at
so
.m
I Ira
ku
0 A
M14 '-
reek
20'

•,z _ �jt 1' � � 'e,i��` � �s, r, f
.1 w'.. .t
w UOF, t za.? dux.
'r �''�'"��a, � [�,�ie 2 i• a � ��f Ali �tt�y'V$:�e�,�, t;
38a
a i 4r1YS T317•
106
r�f't' ` �rrsi� �• ,�� r.[, tO `� ..1.. �'A ''1.�� r f~yyt 'I}'J�`' 1/J Y G'X 'y� �:,.t �� .ar�
,r�-f' 1. 71�,/- ,• r. :/� •`Ik
��-l��,��..���
' ['' lSc� , +1.4-,' �,l, i'Eh Ti4.�S�:; ,�E� §'.:: 4'r, ti. ek�� +��i J,� �� •� �t �},' � �''��+ r. �` �'�: .et
INS[
- '-1, !' tG Y SOa'• 7CFS r 1;i F alL:i '`}� � c�„ ��-[�4 r�, f Via_ i� ��'• .�" . .. .,, :x1 4 �r t
WI
Iry
�,#j�6.s �G'`;. fu{�.' �: �..r ^•e.
1'L z
k r. [ 1 f i. -• s 'to y tt .* } y r+� r!+ti
i . �4 F'' '1 'al �G., � • 'j']08B%+ S ,S i4'` ''r^ r
Q�.y,_ i •� 'li,'� F wr!¢� ')'LY � f"'� '. M� S3�kt..Fv'
Dig`i,
.74
Ic� r���,� ri ra�+:..{ �, ^=;'a' .l��fp. +. �- •��� �If' ��.i b y. �S�! �' F. �1 +, _y 1i
Olt
'�1 .3 r +. F,\ �rr ri l �" i)i •Sr r1 /1 �a a 'fi ss � t 130 � � �1y,amr
61 p:.��� .,l''�.,�„p ��#. � r .! ! .,3 x^ - PS �{`: � � •\ �' �.. � -� ,� . �+ t A 1 y�T`,e-
Vitj'�C''r��.,,♦� {•
�rI
�� "�`�4 i+g '�. S'�'( R CrODiW�.,QQ �fi .Y�-J`t. / F ?• u- t,,i "Ani R,'�- L h s'f,'
'` i1� + •'; i;r'„ _ �'�..��rgr. r it
.y�• ate.. .� { �',r:.�' r �1 �• Y.1 �'r f �. S �+�ri-•'
S - !'r f� r dJ i�✓_ r •_6' ,� '. �
D 7�"" �*.�Y,� G«� rise ���4� „k t,�-'•` ►f
.� S75_rs�l �'�''�`�'$- ��tr�{�jfJw r- A.i� ��r'`�K.' i} ,. - ' �^ j�F, r. it..- F Y.;.r's*'•.�*
,iii�rtf�y��� �� �{'r k s°[ -`�' .L.. �,,J '� •'� 1� r' .' �i. Y u7g$SS)f �..-.�.{ n ' t r -.-�,
i'.r`r �"1[t ". xs .Y�'r'i ',x +'� �f�io, ��'��r�-ti r•'— � _-�i''�%}` k �•.� � r2 r � ' r.i.•'ll/..
ck 14�i M ` 4 44'[R'..t�1 +. , .us!• r. �1
�`�1t r + w xR }T�i
•
♦�.J 1 �'.y.w $n S� ! t- �F, t - 9i*� r is :s�i y. .f �� 1 n i`11:1�`' �.
1
•..,�+o i1.
.�.�� .�'•' ,1 �''�v '� _ ,�� t���., �.d�v�A/�R- •1•H?�� ,• '\P
�� � I�r?� ��� 1 t �_ �� "2 .. .'�t��•S' 1_ 41 � � 7 e •,r � a �•� i �,� # �..r
jar '1;.,e " 1.
I..i 1^W .y,\��i R��?•_�R nr I rA � � � ECG:.#f I.f F� iry *'
YI
rF � ar•�[ „• 7
r
t � r'

SA/i.s.y R'.1 j e-.
WASTE hANAGMIZNT PI "N CSATIFICATION FOR D I:W OR F.SPAb1L1ED FEEDLOTS
Please return the ca- Isted -foaa to the Divinioa of Environmental Hnaagams.nt at"
tho add-aaa an the reverma Aida of thin fora.
Name of
Address:
Phone No.: 'y v Z
County:_ T _n.s 7Wh
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:`-` lQ� ./�Z .2-&-' (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): ;n
Design capacity (number of animals) : 900 Boa 64us 7,0. D;
77
Average size of operation {I2 month population avg_}: DO Sows a
Average acreage needed For land application of waste (acres): s a
ccaacnaaesnca,ccssaaaaw=aenaeuncracexcaaa'rac-�seaa ccccccawersstssass ssaere �cccssacaan�ecaeeaa 42-�Qa0OR3
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standard and specifications of. the Division of
Environmental management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005_ The following•e'le_ments and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haua been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or ,
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage. capacity; -adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third paxty) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; applicatioa rates; loading- rates; -and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe -than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Nara of Technics SvacialiB (Please Print) i�17r15TUQhir._ _Gy, 511Z
Affiliation: C0 .s r o. .$ v<<
Address (Agency)kB06 Alor____r NC. Phone No. .- - --S_ _
i
signature: Date:
xxcc-ca=aaaaQaccgvwaareccic c,a:awwwwwwca:w wanecacAwwrecswt: ar i7 PisG�acw en ear st t:wvaw
Owner/ISanager Agraanant
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be. filed at the farza and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
2:asa of Land OwILI'
lease Print) : r //
Signature • A4Date:_• ,_•_
Yi of Xanagar, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Yotn: A Change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONL• Y:ACNrEW#

r'7ineAje-cl
CcJSee
elC!/0IArV ,,�A�1
�ro�)e4jr
` ANIMAL WASTE
UTILIZATION
PLAN
Producer:
Location:
.Tel.ephone :
Type operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity.)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
WHITLEY STEPHENSON
2350 WILSON MILLS ROAD
SMITHFIELD NC 27577
919-934-2109
Existing Farrow to Weanling Swine
sows 16 Q0
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in, an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under.DRQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, ate.)
/6J)Q sows x 6.1 tons waste/sows/year = 0 tons /76 Q
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1�06 sows x 5.4 lbs FAN/sows/year = 0 lbs. PAN/year 86y D
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS ICOMM N ** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N
PER AC AC USED
----- or -------
APPLY RESID.1 APPLIC
METH N TIME
8 8 2 0 1 D oA C 12 5. 0 136.25 2 0 11, 13' L5-16 .-4-6
I MAR-JUN
8'820 1 lDoA W 60.0 120 0 11.13' 1335�
I. a FEB-MAR
cli R+
9r o ,l0 � .AV /.51 .Gc,
8820 1 DoA SB 38 152 0 1 11. 13"-16.94,7-
'
I
AFRr. SEP .
8'82,0.
2
GeB
BH
7
0
F
I
1350
iiII
AIP,R..SEP.
SG
1
150---7
1-2
8$20
3A
GeB
BH
7
1350---T
I
8820
-3A
SG
1
50
0
8820
3
GeB
BH
3.2
160
0
`a2;0
-3
GeB
SG
1
50
0
I
$$2.0 5 GeB
BH
I
SEP
�$820 5
SG
•
I
BH
�I`8'�;O r 7 GeB
7 1350 10
.21-12173.5
6.21'� 310.5
SEP-MAY
2.5 1875
APR. SEP
6—.2-r a±a.5 /2,
.:W.SO SEP-MAY
15.07 2411.2
15.07. 753.5
SEP- .
2.5 875
1 50 0 I2.5 j125
1 ISEP-MAY
7 1350 10 16.07' 2124.5
Pag6: 3
i�

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
IAPR. SEP.
8'8 2:0 7
882'0 $
APR.SEP.
S2 st 7 n
9
�APR,SEP.
8�82 0-1-9
G 1
I
e
BH 7
I
SG 1
I
BH 7
I
SG 1
I
50 0
350 10
E
6.07 1303.5
SEP-MAY
12 . 54 1889
50 IO 12.54 1127
SEP-MAY
350 10 12.94 11029
50 IO I2`94 `147
SEP-MAY
f TEND �I
TOTAL�lb38:6
I3�83.3
-- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted), or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while -meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
_„ page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.11
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
`
END
TOTAL
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
yg, •. �. -- .M2ra r
wInter3,-annuals follow summer annuals.
In`~lnterplant.ed fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in.bermudagxass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hayY.r;anci%or si�.age. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
wlien they" reach a' height of six to nine inches. Cattle
shoulc3:,be rei�Qved.`when plants are grazed to a height of four
Inches: ' In fields where small grain,' etc, is to be removed
for; hay or`'silage; care•should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or Mays''° Shading may result if small grain gets too
high' a'nd th�a s : wili• r definitely ' interfere with stand of
berinudagrass This lo's of stand will result in reduced
yields and 'less4 nitrogen being' utilized. Rather than
�tting sma3 l g,rain ;for; hayor silage just before heading as
is the normal,..s, ion, you are encouraged to;.' cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider,"harvesting.hay or
silage two to ;three, takes during'',.the season, depending on
time small ' grain is planted'' In the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc,.,is late
September or early October. 'Dri:ll ,hg° is .recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should bQ grazed orNmowed to a
height of ;about two inches before drilling, -for' best results.
�� q� zy''.,.=Grp `� +4�•}h��'mh �.i Y � � y .i r .
h

ANhMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseed ,n:g.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen), equals total required nitrogen
Less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
;W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
$;r7,,
` TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
i i't
TAI+E `2
TOTAL;",
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
83.3 0
0
0
_71. 2.2
Q
16948-. 0-2
* BALANCE
-1-6-9-95- 42-2-5-
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
r fully'•utilize the animal' waste N produced..
tt
,Y •F.�
' l
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in -the tables.
See attached map -showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 0 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 0
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 0 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 0 acres
of land. Please be aware that, these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
r
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding.capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
..rates and a -mounts..
i I
I
(Application
RatefApplic. Amount
'Tract
'I Field
I l
Soil Type
Crop
(in/hr)
I (inches)
R8'2'0
1 I
DoA
I
+ C
I
I .30
1
I *1
8820
1 I
DoA
I SB
I .30
*1
,8820
1 I
DOA
I W
I .30
I *1
88,20.
i
2 I
GeB
I
I BH
1
I .35
I *1
-.8,820
3 I
GeB
I
+ BH
I
.35
*1
z
882.0
3A I
GeB
I BH
I .35
I *1
I
'8820 1
I
5 I
GeB
I
I BH
I
I .35,
*1
8 8,2 0 k
7 1
GeB
!
I BH
I
j .35
I
;.818 2;0
8 I
GeB
I BH
I .35
I
I * 1
I
882.0 i�
9 I
GeB
I
BH
I .35
' *1
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
8'8210
I -2 I
I SG
I .35
I * 1
818210
I -3 I GeB
I SG
I .35
I *1
8820
I --3A I
I
I SG
I .35
I *1
8820
I• I
I --5. I
I
I SG
I
I .35
I *1
88.20
( -7 I
I SG
I .35
I *1
8'82'0
I I
I -8 I
f
I SG
I
I .35
I
I *1
882.0
I -9 I
I I
I SG
I
I .35
I
I *1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many si.tuations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and.
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
as a.o� tscmw to trig acran shown iii Tablas 4 end 2. Failure• to apply
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
.animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5.• Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered.with waste to a depth that
wio"& � .,,I vih-1,0 �'t� VV ft'Vth k v%o �:hetont.isi1 for malt damage from animal
waste •should also be considered.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10.. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See. Standard 3�93 - Filter Strips) .
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
^� 15,.'An.imal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drinageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Anim4_1, waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they'. have been approved as a land application site by a
' !'technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and. on 'other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic', rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
tY 6 s t6'. r.
16.; Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers; toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
r .
animal waste management system.
17. Ay protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REOIIhRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
imp16menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping,. pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance_ checklist should be kept on
site .5 .
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste -during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume)'of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage -ponds .
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals, approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum .crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall'be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. .Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained 'for. five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Caroli-na ,re,gulations.
cV
Paget 13
r,

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:BENT-ONVILLE FARM WHITLEY STEPHENSON
Owner/(Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste trea-tment and' storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan,will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of F;acilltly Owner': WHITLEY STEPHENSON
(Plea'sef"prLnt
Siq.nature: Date;
Name of Manager (,If different fr m owner): —
Signature: ate:
�- a G-9`7
Name of. Per on P ,parinq Plan: (Please print)ChriS W. Smith
Af-filiAtion:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
l►ddresa (Agency) SG6 North Street
signature:
- L +
Smithfield NC 7577
Z [t).
Date:
' ,,'. d C!

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919—•33 -9919
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-9V --!05G
SWCD 919—W — 535/
NRCS 919-9fq —533/
This plan will'be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off -
site. You should not wait dntil wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a pr.oblem.,
You shbu-ld make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan shouldbe posted in an accessible
location for Ill employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. suggested
responses .to some possible problems are listed below.
'A. Lagoon overflow —possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all flows to -the —lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
S. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field —actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion -to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) thaz
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C.: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers—acticn
include::
a. Stop recycle pump.
^, stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves no eliminata furiher discharge.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
W Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators —action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. -Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
M Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. 'often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks --
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side *Halls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a.
Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.
approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
c.
any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the property?
e.
Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f.
Could a future rain event cause the spill tc _each
surface waters?
g.
are potable water wells -in danger (either an cr off
of the property) ?
How ppch ruched surface waters?
3:
Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal- business hours, call 'cur Mr,
(Division, of water Quality) regicnal office; hcne
919- - after hours, emergency number. 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

f
b.
C.
d.
the incident from item ? above, the exact locat.icn
of the facilit_/, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind c^ndi-ices.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call 'local �4S Phone number, 919- -
Instruct cM-S to contact local Health Deuar--ment.
Contact CES, phone. number 919- - local SWCD
office phone number 919- - and local MRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a . Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
C. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
Name
b . Phone:-
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
ei�..a�rn�snrwarvr.rnawls��n.�ga
Beat 1.1�24

-Mortality Ianazement )Methods
(check which Me:hcd(s) are being implemented)
=i Burial three fee: beneath the surface of the ground within ?' heurs after
knowledzt of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv rlowins
strearn or,publlc bodv of water.
Renderine at arenderinz plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
.�. ComoIem incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disuosal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method %vhich in.the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian 'would
make possible the saivage of part of a dead animal's value %vithout endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sour i c Guaise Y - UNIRs 141 Control lusects- - Site Slrcrifir. I'rarlirta
--- ----- _ Liquid Syslenls ------ ----------
lu�li l iullCrs • Accumulation of solids — 0 Flush system is desigted and operated
sufficiently to remove accunitilated solids from
gutters as designed.
Itemove bridging of accumulated solids at
j discharge
l.al ut,u; .uul I'ils T • C'rusled Sul it IS
I:acc»iL•e �li�l�etaii�c 1lccaymg VCgelilllUll
it i,LL'lll
t�r.r.J�i:. ------._�_ • l:cc,l S1rillaLc
Fec,1 `�a„r,�t -T--� Accurnulalious of feed residues
0 Maintain lagoons, scaling basins and pin where
pest breeding is apparent to minin ive the
crusting of solids to a deptdt of no more Than 6 -
R inches over more than 30% of surface.
fo Maintain vegetalive control altiug banks (if'
lagoons and other impnitnlments to prevent
accunualalinn of decaying vegetative matter
along waler's edge an impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Sysletus
1)csign, 011MI143 and rnainlain fccd syslctIIS (e.g.,
hunkers and Irout;hs) In miilintice the
acctuulthuinn of dcc.iying w.Islage.
Clean aap spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval diving silmnier. 15-30 thy interval
duritil; winter).
VI Iteduce moisture ;IMMILdiuiun Lvilhin Mid
urn►rod inunediale perimeter of fced sloralvs
n-CiIs by insninl; drainal;t: away I1-0111 silt
anti/or liroviding adetimile coul:lillmenl (c.l;.,
covered hill lilt brewer's grain and similar hi1;11
Itloislalre grain prndllCts).
fl Glspecl liar and i'eI111We ur break nli acciunulatt:d
Solids in filler strips around Iced Storage :Is
needed.
At.111' - P141VI ni11,a 11. [996. hike I

i
5��urce
Cause IRAM's
to (_onirol Insects - Site Specific Practices
Animal I luliliul; Arcas
Accnlnllladons of animal wastes 121
Eliminate low areas That Irap moisture along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumnlales and disturbance by anini-als is
minimal.
C7
Maintain fence rows and filler strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break sip accumulated solids as
needed).
Dl y Klislitife I landling •
ACCllllltIkiliOFIS of illllflUll WilStCS n
Remove spillage an a roullnC hasis (e.g.. 7 - I{)
SySt�nls
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
C7
Provide for adeclltate drainage around mamire
stockpiles.
n
Inspect for and remove or break up accumalawd
wastes in Ether strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
Fur 1111hre inl,lnnaliuu colitacl
the Cooperative Exlension Service, Department
of Entomology, fiox 7613, Marlh Carolina Slate I Iniversily,
kidcigh. NC, 2-160)-7613.
AMIC - tl11vcJIllicc1 1 1, 19N1i, Page 2