510034_PERMIT FILE_20171231

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
510034 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
10/16/2018 Entry Time: 09:30 am
Farm Name:
Creekside Farms
Owner:
R M Hayes
Mailing Address:
1646 Stricklands Crossroads Rd
Active Permit: AWS510034
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Johnston Region:
Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Four Oaks NC 27524
Physical Address: 494 Stricklands Crossroads Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
❑ Denied Access
Raleigh
919-934-0106
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 22' 06" Longitude: 78' 19' 14"
1-40, Exit 79. SE on NC 50, 1.8 mi. Left on Stricklands Crossroads Rd (SR1143), -- 8.6 mi., crossing 1-40, NC 96, and US 701.
From 701 continue east 2.8 miles. Farm path on left, opposite church.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues .
Certified Operator: Raymond M Hayes Operator Certification Number: 18472
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS510034 Owner - Facility : R M Hayes Facility Number: 510034
Inspection Date: 10/16/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,320
Total Design Capacity: 5,320
Total SSLW: 718,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 19.00 27.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS510034 Owner -Facility: R M Hayes Facility Number: 510034
Inspection Date: 10/16/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
s ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
Cl
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Cl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS510034 Owner - Facility: R M Hayes Facility Number: 510034
Inspection Date: 10/16/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Gilead
Soil Type 2
Blanton
Soil Type 3
Wagram
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑E
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
'Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

I
Permit: AWS510034 Owner -Facility: R M Hayes Facility Number: 510034
Inspection Date: 10/16/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
0
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
0000
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
N
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
page: 5

3vS DINS D 6 Iasi o
'D�iv'ision of Water Resources
racility Nwmber ,jC� - Division of Soil and Water Conservation
� Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: i _ 9 Departure Time: al County: Q3hn Region:
Farm Name: CreekSfd2 �L1(/A_f Owner Email:
Owner Name: R Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: qqq Slffj'&WCpaao#6 l Jl
Facility Contact: 6tQ o 1(tiln4l Title: Cols'4122t Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: M
Certified Operator: RAgm d— (ttp/ Certification Number:
T`
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design Current
Design1WW
Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
I I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Dr Poultr
C+a aci Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
OO ther
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 5(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
1g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
U�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -:3Y Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):_
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E)3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops
from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
5fl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
`p NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continuer)

Facilitv Number: ► 1 - 'k 14 1 Date of Insaection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Eg No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
L4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):, Explain any Y_ES answers _and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better-explain,situations (u'se additional pages as necessary).
Iv) I I n4 & has n uh ed b Id bill 9
sip e s�r�t is1$ I� sr� .3,4- L�g_Vt*-3,�- }� 1�H410
9
y
aLt C#11�rAai
Pwfe + Iea�,s v dam. ar n and- bIQ s��e-hits aye labelled- -for-6eId,
OM i#d&7
Vn 1+441�__)
w#jk
slag 11l
w00'479)
1130 (h
VV00 44s3
1014110
W®oo-106
h/00V'1"$48 JVV
061 bi10
So,lielf
tolavliS SLo15a45,
D ill'�y )s U f+O dale ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
v- - V
Phone: 9iq lq(—�ia34
Date: _17VAP_ 51C) 01�
21412015

e i s ovF Rl�lc�
D`ivi ion of Water Resources
Facility Number 1-5 1 - � � Diviffonolffiil and Water C«onservati
Type of Visit: e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Ig Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: -IJ Departure Time: County: hn Region: R'P_ o
Farm Name: C.0eksild p raint Owner Email:
Owner Name: R M1111 P� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: qqg Stick 6jr CmSfr(Vv�S
Facility Contact: 6PAp Wenned4 Title: C01su/ V4± Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: HB
Certified Operator: RQviro'll M t�04( Certification Number: )gy7.A
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design Current
Design
C«urrent
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Weft Poulrty Capacity Pop.
Cattle
C«apacity
Pop.
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Finish
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
53a
D
Design Current
Dr P�oultrCa
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Non
Farrow to Feeder
_ aci ho
-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Non -La ers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Points
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[]Yes No
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - 3 Date of Inspection:
• Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 9
Observed Freeboard (in): 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
tE No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[�]C No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
E';� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
CZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): n iY; 71I &&Y C08-al 0&'W'g& iTi.Il 4 C90)4 S/n,6ll a1OA
0"Oft6�
ADC
13. Soil Type(s): 6if
14. Do the receiving crops differ from t ose designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
0 Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Ep No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[N NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
JK No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes CS No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [�f No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
RNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: jDate of Inspection: $
• -24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[!o No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NNE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
IS No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
56 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (referI(i question,#): °E)(plain any.YES answers;and/or=any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to,better explain,situations (use, additional pages as necessary):4
ab, day d will nod, & bns em*&.,,h -ecL befog i a ki I aol? ,
rS� qeSv(vqy 101a3lis, 9cy—,3.a� lid Ti vol=3,S; 4a%, Us-.r
0y. CQh brcw_ 5_/P ll y - N o gym, a3 0� ► o� ����
9 101a�il�s
al, wg,�e �na1 y S�� ,a Sof) Tej' s�o►.�a� 4 k I�evel w�� reo,�
0 16)� �° Iry oo T l .1 N o I'Ift Peds� Coed
M.-191 ip ► CO3) � a
Iola911s nrcv aft 1�a9
-Ilad� N000r000 ► �� belly? vvh&e- YY4y
r CDy� 0� D S,G��e /
7- P)ebe )m r©'e- la
oh Of
� U dDwn oM 16f fill J. Ad VIA 1,11016ft Sil�Q�f��O �► ��i�o%�
crop y/ey rl tc2 q-15-c q aAtira%y ;ra
ro,k bqb of cowl; x �� e ra��,
r y'
U ltsf aicL re(.e,,+I y, b; I �It, of 18-0 is due- shorf y
Reviewer/Inspector Name: '3_0411 Sch rp ll-p '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 1 Q(,V) cS� �j�i"& nGd er) r',Jo✓
Phone:a g: q)—H;�3V
Date: 0
/4/2015

erns qs )MI05-
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: j9 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: liollbi Arrival Time: Departure Time: 30,4 County: 0 Region: ICO
Farm Name: Cteeksi'de _ 1G76yl't f'
Owner Name: R , 11, Rage
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: 1" Qy .Sftjcck 1,04dr Cpoff1"oad, U , pJyr Oa1tS
Facility Contact: U m 0 Kenmedy Title: C65,111 WIL Phone:
Onsite Representative: 0 }kf1r* V F1t'� Q� J Integrator: H—R
Certified Operator: RQyhIA'1!� '" + lrp�yYJ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design
Wet Poultry Capacity
La er
Current
Pop.
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
C«urrent
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
a
Design
Layers
Current
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
I
113eef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
J
113eef Brood Cow
Other
Other
IMI
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 15if No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facilit Number: S - Date of Inspection: (p
(s
ii
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
1,2r No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[51 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
r R'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): C�1 Dejo KJtt_
9A V/ )4 Srw114�oh ' Can hh
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
CRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Co No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[54 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
�g Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
5 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
`t' NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412014 Continued

Facility lumber: BSI - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [,U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? []Yes to No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA V] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 154 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes CK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
to No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any, YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations;(use additional pages as necessary)..
i-ear,a6.'RM n-et& has Whnv;� ed, b -ed of is
oDI S►.Pe4`ddOvS)9n,�v�-Rrcla�l'
a 4 Cali h l IN , pv2 I n a 01 �, (sapP►'��
l Wojo_ mn se)
50c16ftpje_ s�, a13yq One P�II r�� lirJ�� �e Y)
ihl:xrrr`oy( chee- 4
71ao115-
0000000
cola. Newsanply ZviIl �e,-takt
31a0t;-
W ©osss:�
I't a,
-Fcr t, lid "A 47 1)1c� ry e 0 K�
la Io1�
Yv0034qQ
('-??
Cro ��I��II�d.O�'dvr+� r�s�'h'�..
� i
Qlafa)1y
1v00114a ,
I.aq
slglly
rv000qt
� �"l��e�ath�ew��C�-o�d,C�"�ficaj�e AfCDvPrQ�c°,
vote,, Prod
CGaIN' d*), n s a� (below)
sl " received- IDlwils, hft ta1011y,sl��a,��e+,Uy�trl-=�.�3f'�
CPS W&I prod �d- (Ki %Wr')ovCsloW#*657 �o hol�/dor�, s/�✓9� kkr,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: . ik) ,� b,64C Phone: qlq-Iqi- 4 013Lt
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412014

(Type of Visit: ® Coq:¢finnce Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ` tvx - 144 y Q.f Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ��
Certified Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator: " 1 Jj
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Region:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
C«apacity
Current
Pop.
esign Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
C11en
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr Poultr C•a aci , Po
La ers
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesgNo❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes —, No/❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ENO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes I J"Noo ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable /Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): hi, G 96-r owl i q 1 ;56 �I JO P" _V
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes❑
VVN9q, NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�ZoNA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - 3 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?.
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: I%- V
Date:-
2/4/2011

Type of Visit: orompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ' County: I1V1 ' RegionO3-0
Farm Name: C ce%k�� 1 � Y1� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0_1A Phone:
ci
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator: (V� b (—Lc.
Certified Operator: H WO h Certification Number:
IV —
Back -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design Current
DesignMPOP
SwCapacity
Pot
Poultrye
Capacity
ean to Finish
La er
Dai CowRWW
ean to Feeder
-Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish (jj
DairyF�]
Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Ur oultr Ca aci Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts '
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
FAIN11111 1 ,,��
Other
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes_,2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes La'Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;;30'1�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

FaAlit Number: - Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes _L21oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ..E!I"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes C2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes .ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes .E:fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes P3"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes O'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes JRFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists []Design ❑ Maps Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �g?*1&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections []Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 k� U!z— I'"" " T l Om� 1 D de-5 0 �Gl _ 6IC4/2011 Continued

Faicili Dumber: jDate of Inspection:
244 DiA the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as
required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the/faacc1ili y ouy�—�oTcomplian�cewith� r &V d-tibns re�il�dto sludge?61fyeJpch�c� ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
a , 9 -
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes O<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2,lqo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA---0 NE
❑ Yes PKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA [3NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES an'swers'.and/or any additional�recomrnendat ons or. any oth"ertcomments � ,
Use drawings of facility to better explain" situations (use additionalpages gas necessary).
Lo o© 9 - (o I �, 1 $CoS.�e.( SL BOSS
l c� o o (A (0 5 y - I I,-( J_ aj�l 'ern I . C�
w o� 1�3i -r9- i� l, a 3 q-��-�
&Lc crn
10, f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: 0"Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ,j2rkoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:
Farm Name: (� r� e k�Cj (I'J -e Owner Email:
Owner Name: Hay Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
County: ZS0h r.3 +D r✓ Region: �,9' O
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: lam fl r)A HMV e S Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swin
Wean to Finish
Design
Current
Design C*urrent
p.
Layer
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Design
C««apacit+y
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Feeder to Finish
Design C**urrent
r Poultr C•a acit, Po
La ers
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
113eef Brood Cow
Other
Turke s
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes'% ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
��db
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[,•�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Flicili Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes P NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. t;20 10 3 �46$I-TG
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
3.3. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ;�fNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes lZrNo
❑ Yes T I/I No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes o
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional.recon iricndations'or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional ;pages 'as necessary
CO. M+1'd a01a Ca ta5q`�w. Ia�3I'
ao II S Iod e C./e.y 0= 3� q-s P = -:;51645 ``( %b tea- 5 1 — I a
Ieau me eci ed J'oc- Ii v P --&tLu Mal . +'M\w 9'6gc/0e_VJ
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA [3 NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
FY
12- COO S1450
1. ey
y-Ia-Ia 6 -I a-1 a$ ®-�►-� a,
If
I, 6ov7
I ,'IL/
1�-1"1Af I-.\,
I, 243G
a.a'7
10-a4-11'�I0 -1If ta-a�-11
�l
It 1 361
1 .58'
_$ - I I X 10--11
pr,)d oce(- c ,,n pj)v-6 1'Ackxi he low 57Lo� /''"YkP
m r, Hmve_. P nxPr4_.S ' L. " h r5 e4n4 A' bC.C9C
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
/0-1/
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Fre) m 9, 15 titW MV
a-4i-/�;;L'
Phone: 2-3 4
Date: j
21412011

Facili Number: Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes J:J-?Qo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): —
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes.,,eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes,,Ej'/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes '2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Fj"N'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes JZ'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes n �Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
7
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes JE'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
"InYes gro
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. (ate-6 & " 01-7 — -;L D O a
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps�(Lease Agreements
[]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: (Col // Arrival Time: Departure Time: County Khs4o�% Region: �ei'5�
Farm Name: -(A' OIA oIX Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Q �� �'�C7L.�p Q Certification Number: y
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location. of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
We to Feeder
Design
C*apaeity
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Laver
Cattle
airy Cow
airy Calf
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Feeder to Finish
#' Design Current
Dr Poultr Ca aci , Po
airy Heifer .
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
OO ther
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
[:]Yes ;2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA:
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 No [DNA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:]Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes G2�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 12TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, et�'No
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes E?rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes C�JlNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ff No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. D/id�hee facility fail to calibrate waste application e�qui7neent�srerequired by the permit? [:]Yes &No
25. is the faYl/t tof coempliage5wftPi pperrmit condifioti�rei-aced �o sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0<0
the appropriate box(es) below. a MC( L/le 070 a1Q 1 -0 : LT2 3 ,%-6 y aai6
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes Vf
INo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes Vf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Vf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations.or:any other comments 11, t t
g sUse drawin s�of facility to better explain situations (use additional ageas necessary). '�la
`� (� .n.N
I6110 Scx�ple Q �'ST'�-� �°t�QLA�
j a (iy I l ® recvireyyer+s le s ♦►.e�vx I Copp(Lr C.,.v\d Z%'Aa r4
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: r ) 9/ - ya
Date: 6
14/2011

Division of Water Quality
FaNumber O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
—� � Other Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: OWN
I Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County:
Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phnna
Operator Certification
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = s = fl Longitude: = ° = ; = 1{
Design C«urrent
Design Current
Design Current
Swine C►apacity Population
Wet Poultry
C«apacity Population
Cattle C«apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish I
a er =T
I❑
Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts ❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Other.
❑ Turkey Poults
Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ,
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,,IJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

r
/1A )r
Facility Number: — Date, of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes �&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ;?rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
. (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ,INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) !!
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
v�13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
P
r��L,`.'<�
Comments'(refer to question`#)r `Explain a`ny YES&answersy;. and/or any, re-fcommendatiionslo�yr anylp'therz. comments„ , k�
'Use drawm s'of facili to better ex lam sttuat�ons; use,' additional a es' as,necessary) ;. t ,h_ , &' ,t
e ,g tY p. -.' VOL(
pig: s.t � I Z'
j
x�
Reviewer/Inspector Name; j,;, e �,...:''.t�?.Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r10. A Date:
1).12 1212104 Continued
age ZUj3

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
zNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
�/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
F/PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
(ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
16No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
V<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Y� I
Additional Comments.and/or Drawin
SS 6 e
"ONOS ias�� n�
a . ,7q -f- a ,ss
'J AI
tl" � � \..po_.. (i' �`) /Pq ►�n11 /� '���..l�.�LCX+� � F.�j \ � y✓ "W` 67r� i v
ltv.k'OpAs — 'Rnncoapmau\,uurP—fyy_u)
H.,
/A
Page 3 of 3 t`/_/1/ _.,_
%Q " '. 12128104
9
�0�/', V)�

Type,of Visit Q�Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
// Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: rrival Time: Departure Time: County: O `M�V`
Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: v
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
�o
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
= « Longitude: = o = 4 a
il
Design Current
Design
CurrentWei(03
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry
Capacity
Population
C+atfpacity Population
n to Finish
La er
❑ Dai Cow
to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
IJ❑
❑ Dai Calf
er to Finish
�3
❑ Dai Heifer
w to Wean
❑ D Cow
w to Feeder
La ers
Non -Dairy
w to Finish
F
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
s
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Turke Poults
100ther
Number of Structures: a
r
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes ,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes,,E5No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ', No
❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

U N
Facility Number: —3
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 10No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes E2'*lo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes j2fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes Z`No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes J2<o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �3'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [2No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 C.c I Phone: l 01 UU
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1212R/Od Cnntinnad

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ElWUP ElChecklists ElDesign El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
arm
.rgo •
i
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ZI No
❑ Yes EjNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ld No
El NA El NE
El NA El NE
El NA El NE
El NA El NE
El NA El NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EdNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
RjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

_ Division of Water Quality
r
Facility Number Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
i.
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: / Departure Time: ► County: Region:
Farm Name: 0 i P e ks l d--P- &COM S Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1 61c,y e � Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsitto e Represe t tive:
t,'e a
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title: Phone No:
Integrator:
P-%tr rt cation Number: 1 y
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 4 =is Longitude: = e =1 = cu
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet .Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
��I I ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood CoAq
Number of Structures: =
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No .❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes X
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElYes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
.12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
.Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ((No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes i o ElNA [:1 NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soiltype(s) 6-jeCta 1 V�Iai,,A0n) ,6- 1 lea C1 .
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
JZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
X o
ElNA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name e Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur : Date:
12/28/04 / Continued

Facility Number: s Date of Inspection
Re qiired Records & Documents
u
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O-3o�
0-g 6�
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need im ovement? If es, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
P g Y
Waste is ion Week Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers nnual Certification
j(Rainfal ❑ S ocking rop Yield 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rain Inspections < eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Dif(aacility, fail to calibrate waste application equi ment as r nu�ired by the permit?
#Vb
Didfacility IaiTto / nflu�t laid urve as re ire y thperm t?�
2 Did the facility fail to have an actively ckfied operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus to s assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes YN
fo
El Yes o
❑ Yes [`No
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes [ No
El NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
[INE
[IYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE

51-34 RM Hayes
pH
5/25/2008
7.63 W06444 3/26/2008 2
1 /26/2008
1 /25/2008
1 /14/2008
1/13/2008
7.32 W03124 11/14/2007 2.3
9/15/2007
9/14/2007
9/9/2007
9/8/2007
7.84 W00200 7/10/2007 2.9
5/11 /2007
5/19/2007
7.36 W07269 3/20/2007 3.4
1 /19/2007
2/10/2007
6.84 W04590 12/12/2006 1.6
10/13/2006

30
I.
Facility Number
vision of Water Quality �\v i
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency V
Type of Visi>itWompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Acc
Date of Visit: �JArrival ,Time:
nI C/ Departure Time: County: i�
Farm Name: CA Q Q� }�4 SL Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
I
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: RmjP 5',Q a L60- l lj'e
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
ISwine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: I O L/
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = i = « Longitude: = o = 4 = «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
�I 1 10 Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current =:P
CapacitylY Population.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
E3Non-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ElNE
ElYes ❑ VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

V
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes .ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the approp�rate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[--]Yes KNo❑
NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
E I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
qjc� `� r t 1 _ ✓ �
` ta�
T
12128104

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADalication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[]Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
o
[INA
ElNE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes17No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
A,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 9 1 Q - 7 9l — of
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: Sil
r 12128104 " Continued

�+ w
ElIff-UP:
�C
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510034 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251034 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 04/27/2007 Entry Time:09:50 AM Exit Time: 11:20 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms Owner Email:
93y-olo�
Owner: R M Haves Phone: 99rk96
Mailing Address: 1646 Stricklands Crossroads Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude:35°22'06" Longitude:78°19'14"
Farm Location: Strickland Crossroad Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Raymond M Hayes
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18472
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11) Must not exceed one acre-inch(27,154 gal/ac.) for any waste application events. 7/1 /2006 applied 27,870 gal/ac.
21) Be sure to keep records for crop yields for fields receiving wastes and are harvested.
Very high lime recommendations, lime must be applied as is a permit requirement when recommendedper soils report.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251034
Inspection Date: 04/27/2007
Waste Structures
Type
Owner - Facility: R M Hayes
Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 510034
Reason for Visit: Routine
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon LAGOON 41.00
Page: 2

Date of Visit: I 3 7 a& Arrival Time: J - 6 Departure Time: County: j WAjSTJA/ Region:
A4 Farm Name: �% Ati 4 i_S Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: / iJ Integrator: l9 S ?�-
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: R N 72—
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity' Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
21 Feeder to Finish
SL y o
_Z S
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other-,
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = g = is Longitude: = o = 4 =
gs
Design Current r. `;Desi
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Gaps
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
- - -
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
G
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures.[
<::<s
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes 'P,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
/INA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes �No El NA ❑ NE
El Yes 1ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection 3 "I _
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ YesA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _33
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any oft he structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes P
No [INA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [INE
maintenance or improvement? Vf
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �fNo El NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10%'or 10 lbs []Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ?-[]Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
7 •j as '7't-
13. Soil type(s) t.k.,� ,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes PIN ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, D Yes J� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes f� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�� �/. !,"J rr�`
ai�..
Phone: 7 i z.
9 `�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
(.
Date:jji
12128104 Continued

4 1 0
Facility Number: 5 — 3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [;2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6IL'7 (-->
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes,,,ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Ap ication ElWeekl�eeboard ElWast Analysis [3So�alysis ❑ Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ I�nfall ❑ S/Being ❑ Crop,)ield ❑ 120 Minute Ip*ctions ElMonthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ WeatVCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sluJg s rvey as required by the permit? 4- 3 LTZ
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? l� I29I �� t'S
!I JQ 4
Other Issues a%Y
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of visit VCompliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 9'Ftoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: f O Departure Time: ; Sa Countyt�:�S _r4 Region:"�
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone: T %5 3G9 b-7 b
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 6C-)0 Y�,�,1 F� N Integrator: iklk J H. S'r0 VM S
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 7Z
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 6 = Longitude: = o = 6 a 1{
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
P-Teeder
to Finish
37"D
45,97
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
I
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er 1
i
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
j
Number of Structures: �1
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
El Yes
,I_LJ,/No
IQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
C2"No
❑ Yes
C2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S/ — 3
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: e—M µ- I
❑ Yes G/No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
El NA El NE
El NA ❑NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes JZ/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
Z'ps cam. ACV "7f too -7-L--
12. Crop type(s) C_ s' 4/j,.Qr-* 1:�CsC,►1: J - Sg
13. Soil type(s) W '46 onta. 6"'c, C A' 531
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes h No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
So^-�>=o g 4�� f►� %:Sri w i
Reviewer/Inspector Name o x S 7 1CZ �1R Phone: �r19 xz6o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S1 +f 0 S
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ,5j — 3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents ,�/
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Perrmii readily available? ❑ Yes l,4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facilityfail to have all components of the CA Prereadil available? If es check
p Y yes, ❑Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA EI NE
y�iL] _7 / .z��f�
❑ ❑
❑ WasjKpplication ❑ Weekly eeboar
Waste A lysis ❑ Soil Analysis Waste
Transfers
Annu
a e
i f�c.�hf
❑ Rail ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
A ofjjM- #s47
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
;ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? c jrj j­q
❑ Yes
oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? q(l
1 1
El Yes
VNo
❑ NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) cer ification?
iZf �
J em 1 I s �,
El Yes
ZNo
El NA
El NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
AIyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
,_,(
id the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
/U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes Yes
�,{
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
I dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
EAzddltiOpal'Comments:and/or Drawuigs i ., y� + ' � ' � G
►��M l fi To Y-s" Cl-of 'k ir-LA7
12128104

Type of Visit OJ'Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ,Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
r-- L Facility lumber Date of Visit:
�„�c�J—
P"Permitted,ZrCertified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered
Farm Name: lU1 I�r+y ES 'Fa21A
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: 6rja
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Time: t
Date Last Operated or Above Thresl Id: _
County:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: -STIr'
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ° OK Longitude 0 1
Design Current
Swine Canacity Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
I :F;::]
❑ Feeder to Finish
I S7_ a
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver EEI
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I t I ; ' IL1 Subsurface Drains Present IIL1 Lagoon Area ILJ Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑Yes ezNo
❑ Yes L jNo :
❑ Yes P No
l] Yes P'No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
Structure
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): _
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 51 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ,"No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLTP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes XNO
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ;2rNo
❑ Waste Applie: rtion ❑ Fr�oard ❑ Was;O/Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
2' 316 / t/a S%3
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria ifi efkct at the time of design?
❑ Yes eNo
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes �Xo
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
discharge, freeboard
❑Yes VNo
(ie/ problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes �ZNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes P'No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes . ;'No
T
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) 01Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? .Oyes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes R No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? i/r �V ❑ Yes ;R'Nio
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? poy, £„D 0Q4k, P Yes ❑ No
35. Does record eeping for NPDES required forms ne d improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes [-]No
❑ Stoclang Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑ R ' fall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 MimZInspections ❑ Annual Ce ification Form
12112103

I -Facility. Number: J / — 3 r Date of Inspection 3 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes J2 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes al�o
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? P'�'es ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes pl!�0
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®'No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XNo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
20S 1/0, (SN FW (rr, s--
12. Crop type e_ T . fAsr Fib &.9 OJL C. C vj S 6
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Wast Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes C'No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? '( ( ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes RrNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes RfNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes gNo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PI -No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ONo
Air Quality representative immediately.
c,®.� S`� ..t 'r g P Q Ste► g-.D '�R-c P� ri?,
plot D,SC4^9-Gt= AS
O 'r►A-t:.R— i2 FP A iGtTO£t..�►i c�1 i �. - �� S J'7�i P
WAT-cf-s or- -to, &rA-�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Field Covv ❑ Final Notes
fiAy � A- ✓#L <-� 00-
M QS 0- nib- P-£'AC-4--
Date:
LG/LLr/VJ a.V/LLL/LLLGu

Type of Visit Ocompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: L L' ime: 0' 2-0Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
ermitted P Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thres old:
Farm Name: � A 4R4 rC County: —S I -r�n -fj
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: G.C� (CC.4xtl> �b�
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: f!We/, f J r, S--rc, 7—ArL4:�-,
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 Ou. Longitude 0 4 66
Design" Current
Design Current ;- Design -Current
Capacity Population
"Poultry atle Capacity oulationSwine
_
❑ Wean to Feeder
° ❑ Layer
_
❑ Dairyi
❑ Feeder to Finish
✓r' 3'Zo
Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
r
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
°
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
b�Number of Lagoons LL Subsurface Drains Present JILJ Lagoon Area JLJ Spray Field Area
-Holding Ponds/SobduTrapsz�Q t ❑ No Li uid Waste Mana ement System
.>$
e ,,' a
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes O/;�`No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes JON
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes «< No
❑ Yes ONO
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: s l — 3 Date of Inspection -i L2. o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes/dNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 11,10
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes [ o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level //
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ZNO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excccsssivg Ong PAN ❑ Hydra is Overload ❑ Yes g
��� t / z
12. Crop type C.. 4ra�,.tt Q�rs��lP�-� C, 'i �S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated d the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ONo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes � N
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily av ilalable? ❑ Yes eNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animarl/
as.Ji nt e�►ent Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
-1 •'Z ❑ Yes �No
Ly 2-a 1
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, analysis & soil/sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ,2<o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �' o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes E3<o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ,01 �o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ETNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes A21 No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Commentsi(°refer to question #) Explain any YES;answers and/oraany,recommendahons or any other commentsl`� ` �
s g p p g_ �y field Copy ❑Final Notes
Use;drawin s of facih to better ex' lain situation . (,use aad�tional, a es asecessar 1 y Lill
.
.0 ;J To %C LA &-r'VP t J (.A19 F— �—� 7 �` CAW'r L, A C. o;DW fit-1 t1S .S} -aV(—D
gc �t-ASatl��l.� To N1A�P�G� TJ•: S IrPrGoi�� t�liTll S- U WF1't1k�
�� �a�rt� -rata�J r
.i<.�oc=-os o� ►��� �����T� �, M�a�c y c
R-sO.t C.s� nlCr�� i,S 1�
Q i G *7r -a 4 � n,. sti 8nr G CS
`
L f Ati� C� t+.P� E^f.� �� SEV A� �i- "v' E� �" `�'�� 41'Z. i ll Z S 1lb
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 / 1 Continued

Facility Number: $/ — 24 Date of inspection I !
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
;R<es ❑ No
❑ Yes N
ElYes No
❑ Yes ]�No
❑ Yes
ec
No
❑ No
Additi' taCommen't"s,'and/or D,ri wings:.-:
2� F -e7l Jr,, CsvA6Ee- `Z �� �� Z
O5103101

<Wgvz�p
I
Type of Visit !'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: e=NotO
Time:
Facility Number
rational Below Threshold
r9il
Permitted Certified � Conditionally Certified Li Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: l_tA —4A AV£.S County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:9^ sc� AV '
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:i£Mcy►� SQL - �F�1 S,
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 « Longitude 00 6 «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes ;dNo
❑ Yes 4o
❑ Yes �KNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 6
El Yes No
❑ Yes �No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: S I — 3T-1 Date of Inspection 5 Z3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding
Zw S 40", se
12. Crop type G, gEpM.
S
❑ PAN ❑ Hy
draulic Overload
>
Gee ? (;-EsWz f -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated idthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents 9 1 I q� Q6p . 12191 04
17. Fail to have Certificate of Covera�e &General Permit or other Permit rea i vas a e?
(tea
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Man gement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 11)4 Z"
.11 ilo 3 2.3 tz /� oI
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irr' ation, freeboard, w'astt analysis & soil satitp a reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes JNO
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes Nj
❑ Yes YNo
❑ YesN
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes A o
El Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes B` o
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ZNNoo
❑ Yes N
El Yes "
El Yes No
❑ Yes ! "
El Yes o
El Yes 7NWo
El Yes
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
C6inments (refer,.to,question#)VExp�la�in any* ES answers and/oaany recoinmendyons or any of er comments, ��� 1 `
Use drawings of facilityxto berter�explainsituations. (use additional pages as necessary : Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
O.
�mM
pN� 4 cpf , " 1,1F
i= P� � rt' WAS t�Pt b AT PrPP1r't.Rz 'Rs"' w 1
� n� ear _ t 1
V�J:rA lMM£1��P��-"i
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -b
05103101 /11, 1 Continued

Facility Number: 4;1 —3t� Date of Inspection Z
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ;],(es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ;aAo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P'IQo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [ Ko
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Oyes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: .
3z o.% WAG 'ZE � a,'2� �h V %(.
O5103101

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other Cl Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 5/23/2002 Time: 10:50
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: RM Hayes Farm TDM #9 County: Johnston ........................................... RRO ............
Owner Name: R.M.
Hayes
Mailing Address: 1646.Sxricklands.Crossroads.Read......................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:...
Onsite Representative: R.MAUye%.Gena.Keanedy..
Certified Operator: Raymond.lY.i........................ Hayes.
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 938-8030
F,aux..0a.ks..NC..................................................... 2752.4 ..............
....................... Phone No:....................................................
........ Integrator: Premiium.Staiadar.dEArnn.of.North...........
......... Operator Certification Number: B4.7.2.............................
+arm Location: Strickland Crossroadr
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©• ©' ®" Longitude ®• ®' ®"
E.......,.,.i{
�..i¢srl@t,@„fiii,.,.
i R A t' i ,E"i'
�t€�f
i at.
fr1,7a.
s�,C'.a >f@Po
j
,, (.@@<bEtfia3?@i�ailil.
'' 9 , f kttt S •'t t. Il i ,... # €.....
n Gunrent,
,i
dPonitrYil�€ @'€ qCa Po j,�,.,,t�. iCa �:Po ulahoni
i@@r,EtiSwmeiEeretif9P[[t
r, {E�:�t.,.,,t,
acit,
P k HYk:kd�rP
nlatloni
aca ulation�t�:Cattle ace
?.. tY�
ti
❑ can to Feeder
❑ ayer I� ❑ airy
;ll`
® Feeder to mis
,,i; [3 on- ayer �(li ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ arrow to We -an
ylil I€ Ni i{ €ip}1
;f€tt36r , €Eii
r,r 3"
to Fee er
}
erFarrow r
li�`i❑ i'iliaiklu{ ii til G i
i(i5li7r,}i2fi€t4f€#`0
i€l�d!
❑Farow to Finish
,�
t t
11411111 u§ `€3P�s'
a@ `@'
stgn apagtyii'i
E€€?t
11rl t,E�i
III t C❑Gilts
flli4�i i # €f saht�i I�rt€p E __ i;
¢ ' i
Ifl�o707,400
k'�i ' E i;@ �i'@` �' 'Ifl °`t `i E I �( ER1ji(illkC Ttal l SSLW ?;y j
Boars
jgp
�'t�tE=P!
�. illilli , r 3 i€f d##. (I {�I 1��y1j{iiI t j{{@ f,a{'a' dsa €k°{j('3j}[iy( ]7{3{ @}3�jj
�ffidLiE.€.tA(lx?{#f,Li.=.i.Pt6�41llif,i,li€1€tk6i}•�1,i.ki(.(Yf%17t}a{a.dt,�€f➢taY.�thd
Pi',}�3,?<tlfEfrMr�t,/„1.4,�t.-dE'jfYf ki .., <....,,.,.. r. <:.: ..... < r: .•..,.,.. :.<.<.(r,tf
fi=fa,r,rli!t11p'i''
�rsttz
`i}Nuintiler;o`fLla''E�oons ,i@' =
gd7�i �,,,ra ,ttdd�p 9(f�k ta.a r� i,77gg�i
S#IIIr}
p,,,�i r i �_... ._ .....
I @qp(° ❑ u sur ace rams resen p agoonrea ❑ pray Field Area
t.[£ dr,it;;iia€(,.`jgfett#.f%,{S t..°r 'R!i. t.?e....
P
;;[Hol'dmg;�P£onds°F/ SolidrTraps, I
••
_..._._... .. .� i , 'Y : .... ............... , .,... ,,., ME—
i s ❑ o ��m.., Waste .,,..,anagemenys em,...ii�t
y(
az '
t€.�{},IXRSfF$�Tki£fl£T£iFi437E:`3i.it,LE£E
l gE gtJR 1 a q g,9 �,t, t t+ �� i ip9t'
ri.ta@t',t7li:£6,�i @i.iS£Pii{3@,
,AEI
.,:.. ................:. ,.:�.rE4931S��h`i .,., _.�iaie",.sie,�xt:.kf2<?BNk.ni2�i>4;.lii.ir'1S@
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IN No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 17 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6
Identifier:
..........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............43.......................................................
05103101
...................................................................................................................
Continued

O5103101
Facility Number: 51_34
Date of Inspection
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
p Yes
11 No
p Yes
H No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
Cl No
p Yes
H No
p Yes
N No
Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
" c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®TTo
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes H No
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
t91 Et -I. ft.13 i3o9 :9(I,#E 8ii ""S+Z98H C! tit!l8.9.98+8E..E:.'t t.t P4Plaed d%bpt%it"3'k88 89 t33 F!!lfiit4Ed6tii9498&Mli de{&h!a'dVi��'- t atiif 9+iretBW.Y YI :##tt HtYt}iYCY.YH t49,.9'i:i-' :• �+ anePmq r ! fii P, { 1� 3 M i r• r+ +9 s #r f a PF 3 3e�gi? j I#�{Y# !3,
Commentsrefergto uestton # ;; f x lain an: i1';ES answersf,and/#orlani recommendations,or an', = oth r comments: 4 1a,, }l1 f
ry ( 4 ), P. t . yT} ,d., , y,. YIt +.,.9
!@ f 3 }rt1,� ,q, ptY p-tppgj �igd�{y�¢ry}}j�y'd(y(¢ titfl } s l g 64pfp}f�! ,1,.;,+,.
f.ii..3.��. fin... f.qf li ikiHS'9i6 M. f{Y.tt..i.+i,"•.E Sift . F,.+ -':.`.If�tA•�t1�4FH� 111ffld eddiLYlib§i#t$ed29d48kI#��.i„d� �eWYi33�psif(iti�5k'Gu�Y f ikr'dri7i4dsi0."i.tiU±{S�iiUe�siiiix YP f91d{i(,�t{+i'
Use drawn s;of faci[it it bet ere lain sttuahons use add�ionall a` esasnecessa r) l.
yfiP �} g R f p Field Co Final Notes
,tt,.a�.t9.E:tgP } i ,le`f'j f�,;. py ®
µµ'' f .r.4. ig{q} 1d0 THERE
g( t; {7 ¢�{(g} jj jy}ggg(j fit,. r+. r+Y. ^a.7 n, n #
etii�i�E�r �'R6t,k( .,S ,i,Tft,•f.fEfifi> Htr.m f. .,nf£f{�li�t,,.,4„s.{.KNI81646�PifS,rP,.f}i�>ii��i7ti��i�i4iiii7ai4�e�:�11:3y`e£k"iFtiifrl@?_�P'Ti,i.ss.a.tiAiS!i-�dts:#Ilf3SfKiz,k:i..kCdi s#,.:7tY4ri?:.FFEECz .._�saz
•, ,.
f'(
s..
T
r ,y��
Tp�p i"?^'T I'1 }iliF d! •Y::S [d FFtYlt itd`{ Y 4qY'j YEd 1!l:...� ie 3 fA f.F 9�tY X�f' :: Y �?'LE t21 " d :ti llp }gp }j"q^}i)y(�{ `i '
Reviewer/Inspector Name JohntN, jHunt ., F +jSi, i'if,¢i{41¢i;r [tPl gi4 d#Si Sd19#8" gFYtiji! q -i[E t!li ii i t E jf {3E3pfi
ifi'r fr„+}fi?Rtld3xitridtztdtpi �aldlxb`ixi �x2d�ftfb.,ltlsES�iH irk. ,rd'ax ;iFz�IME;!&t �€NE�hS€Ei� l,i�flG?6(a�tC�' �'3�{h.�6���,.,`.'F�.!`���t�:e�£-7,t�?a��tFxE.i$s�i7i{d,1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

t
11
b IZ
Type of Visit ,Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation.
Reason for Visit Q4outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Z% 'or Time: / Z 30 Printed on: 10/26/2000
5 � �
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Ofermitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
..........
Farm Name: .............�—.M....... .` ............................................................. County:..........ti.1ak�.m!.S.. a. ....................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................... ..............
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ............
..............
Onsite Representative: ....... ��....... .................................... Integrator: ..........rr.b �.
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
.................................................................... Operator Certification Number:..
[]Swine []Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude ' ° 64 Longitude �' �6 «
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
ClIfeederto Finish
Z
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I[] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischars_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I SuRucturc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ;3 No
❑ Yes '0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
Structure 6
Identificr:........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 1131 Al
5100
Continued on back

Z�
Facility Number: S )- 3 Date of Inspection01
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
P No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
JJ
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
W(No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
R(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
P(No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
P*N' o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
VNO
12. Crop type v.) AIrSt_ A44J Ate S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended fora wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
Required Records & Documents �/
17. Fail have Certificate Coverage B General Permit
Yes
to of readily available?
❑
j2'No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified n�mala e Management Plan readily available?
Yes
�No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
S
9s
❑
aas
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri tion, freoard, w�e3 anaZs&sot aim reports)
❑Yes
�No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
plfgo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
freeboard
❑ Yes
JNo
(ie/ discharge, problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
yiQlp(iggs •or- ftrjdencies wire po' ed. O(Wirig Ns 'visit; Y;op will •0e0ye po fuctp$r
corresaorideace: aboutithis visit. .................................. .
\y\ 5E4C4LAI._ J��EI.DS �C-�4�'£O� dr.I0 C-1Mli�,/. Mdst' MArlidTIN t.J Dt}-_
I S) I= v_o C Fr- r w.E, PAs T v�� - J -y W UN- ABM Fob 2 VT-A4n d�
�R-P-t'S_ '°t'l,IAS �EE.6�S C.l�nrs�SJ�R•�$1.�, �M.����.lu►E,rfT.S '�02.� GOa1-��OSJlilei'i%�j
I 'Z, PA A fv-rr '04 To 14 ti b f �Ts JW0 Ail- 7ZXEAS$_ VALA-S -tA&,T- ►.% O't c,N 00-6e S
occu(Z _
f .O y r ¢ } r
PNames_ 7f%,
Reviewer/Inspector 1; #. H,w�� 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �j „_ � . Date: 5100

Facility Number: S\ — 3 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 1P No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes VrNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue odneighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes dNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes Ef No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? []Yes J!(No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes C'No
5/00

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine p Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
L�
Facility Number Date of Visit: 10/12/2000 Time: 15:30 Printed on: 12/6/2000
p Not Oper7ional p Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: R1Y.i:.Hayes.Fa:rw... TAM19...................................................................... County: Johnstan........................................... RRO............
OwnerName: R.M ......................................... Hayes .......................................................... Phone No: 93R-SO30 ...................................................................
Facility Contact: ......................Title:
...........:............................................................................................................ Phone o:....................................................
Mailing Address: 494.Stxicklands..Cr.assreads.Rd................................................... Faux..Gaks..N.0 ..................................................... 2752.4 ..............
Onsite Representative: ................................................ Integrator:.TJ!].!')(.Farms,. uc...................................................
Certified Operator:Raytuond ............................. Hayo ................................................. Operator Certification Number: IR4.7.2.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine 0 Poultry 0 Cattle 0 Horse Latitude ©a ©6 ®" Longitude ®e F-PT-16 66
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ® Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ® No
b..If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? ceased
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
0 Yes 0 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .......................................................................
Freeboard(inches): .......................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................
smn C'antinued au hark

+ 5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number: 51_34 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 12/6/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes p No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes []No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes p No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload H Yes p No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes []No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes p No
nniS"SSS EY "k" ,.>ii}" 3 Sirs t;n a tj j i
Reviewer/Inspector Name { JohnjjN.JHunt, j§.¢$: @S „3}.(.S`3YS jj t S4 �' # }°;};(,15¢ §gtt gi i �,;;$J, � 1
l i d a :i8�aia. E&k#an#ttitft{#t E>#,S,S:{:(S�3ti�5 d 1 d :. iz li h' R %i,t..R.�x S i1ididix11111"p}i i P',!tli t�tih t�+�t? i ip;91f�:ii iftf Fi�;:` u.; � y � .1S#. ; � .°� I
Reviewer/Insnector Sianature: Date: cinn

Facility Number:.5) — :3 Date of Inspection �cep
LD1
S 6i c; i J . c.� i 4 c' � n.
✓5E- // - -
.33yv
4z
kaIILIC30
It: 33 P n-
7/25/97

JAYRoutine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
ItE�D I Facility Number Date of Inspection Time of InspectionRg�24 hr. (hh:mm)
,oPermittedACertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: , I ^��
......... .�...�......�-:� �.���..................................................................... County: ...........�./-:!................
Owner Name: !� ! I (o /" .. Phone No.........................................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................... ... Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:....KM t� s... G� `�... ^!^f� ,.......... Integrator: ........ ........................................
..... ...... .... . ..
j1nJ6
Certified Operator:.........................................:.............................................................. Operator Certification Number:....).... 5..y..Z............
Location of Farm:
r..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................�
Latitude �' �" Longitude
Design Current : Design Current j Design = Current
Swine Ca city , ;Po` ulation Poultry Ca aci Po ulahop. , Cattle , f ,Ca ace ty Po ulat,on
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy
Y ❑
eeder to Finish 3 ZJ 53�- _ ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy '
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design, Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars .Total °SSLW
Number of':Lagoons' ' 3' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area t:
Holden Ponds Sold Tra s;'-System
lg , P ❑ N Liquid Management 3.
o id Waste Man ent
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;3No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. It' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2-1140
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes , ]IN o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 214o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .........
...............................................................................................................................................
.........................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes <0
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

',. Fac,Qity Number: - 3 Date of Inspection f B
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes F0
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9No
8..Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
;!(No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
ZNo
\
12. Crop type C-$Fe,�JD� ��ny��C.►i£.�f F� 1)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Ja Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
g
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
XYes
[_1 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
Required Records &c Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
.E�o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) /
❑ Yes
.E]rNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, wastetanalysis & soil' ample reports)
❑ Yes
2
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Q'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
El-<-
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [9,<o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes I.d'No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �o
yi'i0dences -we're ntd-d0•rngihlsysit! • .." -reoeiye do; furthr • • • • o;agrisor iio;
•corresondence. about. this vsit: 1=J Lo
• • • • �dT�S
..i ir.::h' f ± 3,irF#
Comments (refertto question #) ;Explain;any'YES answerstand/or any recommendations�or!any,oth�ef comments,
f...L.. t„i!. .kr:�.. t$ ..'!.: 3... , .. ..... ........
I t t r s 1 1 l r, tg
:�rs t z a e{ E i
�Usezdrawu►gs ofafacihty, to,better explain s�tuat>tons<<(use�;adcLttonal?pages asnecessary) u'r' r, i3`,klj ='r ,
1J�6 PAO rZ PAF- F4a S(,E/"5 ✓.1: TN fuss`I R(✓ar sveF#'iCA a jefu r4,1y 5 de -_a r.AcrP_+t- A,
U-4AP,-J(� AA,1-V.S f<�spec-unt�y �02 F� �tA? tJ rf-� �LvP�s
1ayDL 1j. L 1
JI) ltior3�`�E. f1oM�. A0 GA0Er% Id 17JIS• FiELYJ nrpT (RlciC:va'>V-=D O6i✓Li
3 GATT L£� Nn £ C�RRLT,�JZr Fi t_O Z, ZA- A "r !> Ul%rr, t.. 'U� P `� l6r AJ'Ii1 e. Fv•L C vA STAG Q uG
�G Z A,Jn 'ZA- T-4 u S n(F E,�t co.dS `bra--Q c iw, P,L o ✓F�f�J7S TO JU S •rrr 7 S Y C£ r_ r
�TeTrAa(•£ Ac�EAC•£UJ) "-a _rII6g A.Jo _,��s ZhT wr" LLrrEL er r;r C-AO2-t-
AtTC, Af&tC_ATI- �CCA1Q-OS �eR- 6'F� S. co foM/'C�i �/CfEe.ioO r-IA4C RfE.�MP+J.£o ro P-0
Ju1S� '13i G..J.✓,�/(; PEti-,vo FWt PftL,-L_AT N f� Be,¢,"JOA- Ya4.s LA"iS d"Zib - QD 9C Q&yoJfd� 6K�+
crt..► dLl W. u, P6A•J ro j.✓cc tl0 f GJZaz+%� Cr .. �'� � i y SO•RP— S, GAA:rl �, f Fi%Lri Z A vo 2A 'TAS V,S;Ir__ --
Reviewer/Inspector Name i E
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� [ ` ,j, �,,,,_-�{ — Date: ••.ri 1 R

�. .RkFility Number: — ,3L Date of Inspection I B
Odor
Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
0No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed.of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
6 No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
ONO
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
ZNo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
J2�No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
;!fNo
tiona $mgients an Ors„raVYln S i�. ° ".� .�rt
� � .Addi.n
L
7

G;
(Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Sl 34
Date of Visit 4/18/2000 Printed on: 4/25/2000
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold.
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certifled 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: R.M..HAyeS..FArM..TDM.#.9...................................................................... County: Jolmston ........................................... RRQ............
OwnerName: RZL........................................ DAXCS........................................................... Phone No: 93.8-.8.Q3.0 .....................................................................
FacilityContact: R,M,.Rates..................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 494..Szriclduda..G.rosSxaadS.Rd................................................... kajur.0also..NC:.................................................... 2.7.524 ..............
Onsite Representative: .............. Integrator: J)L?.M.FarlRlSs.tixe..................................................
Certified Operator:RaYMOnil.M........................ Raye's ................................................ Operator Certification Number:18.47.Z .............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry [I Cattle ❑ HoiLatitude 35 ° 22 ' 06 Longitude 78 • l9 'F 14
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): .....23................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................

t' ... „ Continued on back
Facility Number: 51-34 Date of Inspection 4/18/2000 Printed on: 4/25/2000
5. Are there. any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8.. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require.maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Anglication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Fescue (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ® Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rye uured Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
V: No•vio[ations.or deficiencies •wer.e doted duringg•this: visit.• :You1 4iCl• i eiceii've•no�furth:er•. -. -
eorresnondence.about this -visit ... ... ......... ... ... ...... ... ... ... . .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
3/13) Cattle are grazing fields 2, 2A and UN1. Just beginning the waste application period for C.Bermuda, thus cows should be i
removed OR change W.U.Plan to include grazing. There was a very thin stand of small grain remaining (2&2A) as per this visit.
W.U. Plan gives 400 lbs.N/ac. for C.Bermuda hay for 2 and 2A,'thus these need considerable improvement in coverage to substantiate
these rates. Discussed drainage problems and improvements for spray fields that will help this farm. Likely that Mr. Hayes will
implement a diversion from wooded area currently draining into the spray field as has been discussed with the Johnston SWCD.
Currently fields UN 1 Tract 1188 and fields 2 and 2A are poorly suited for waste application. Several questions should be cleared up if
a WETTABLE ACREAGE determination is completed for the farm.
11) Mobile home and garden are in fescue field but not indicated by map, unsure if proper acreage accounted for in W.U.Plan.
Reviewer/Inspector Name

.�
Division of So
t 'DDinsion of So
ivnsi'on'of W
0 Routine JEComplaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number I 3 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
,wPermitted,13"Certified Q Conditionally Certified Q Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: p ..........................
Q.N�.....fJ'4�(..................................................................... County:..rQt`..,C. r............................................ Farm Name: ..........
Owner Name: ................................................... ..... ....M-3 4 ....................... Phone No: �.
.............................:.........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:.......
MailingAddress: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .... 9.... 6A......... JAPq.e.-Z........................................................ Integrator: ..... -ram ...............................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..i!. :�`f..7.z . ...............
Location of Farm:
A
.................................................................................................... ............................ ...
Latitude • 4 64 Longitude • ' "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes"No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes PNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ;D'No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway pr<es '''o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �o
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: S% — 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes AA� No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental ,threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
/�108.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
ElYes
o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
INo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
0�o
12. Crop type G. V-4-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?.
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
s
ElNo
15. Does the receiving crop. need improvement?
/Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
,WNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
21"'No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigatioft; freeblo"ard, waste analysis-& soil4di�ple reports)
❑ Yes
ZNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
VNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? •
❑ Yes
;"No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes )zNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes J�] No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �No
' o yiolafiQris;or ilgfic..... were noted dpr:ing this:visit; .....ii...... Rio f.. .
:•:•corresnar'dence:a'bau>�this:visit.•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:':•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-*-.-.•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:
Commentsi(ref, r to' ups}bon #) i'+'Ex lain, an AYES answers'and/or,an"-recommendations`gr`�4py othencomments'
�,�,,..9,,,.,.,.,..c,, .p u y,..,,,, ......y Y„�,.. �...
i. f.d i �..x..3 ,...�...:,. �i i.,i ll. ..; � ,I.�.��t:ldY t.t t. itfl j� � n.�i....{Itlf.•fN+�afti.�xf},?(9 I�>d;h �., S�}lS. �£�?4� }.. i(;t€ {.F �Sr. �.i �`e��.. ; iL�_ ��. (1 .. #:..�i, .Y r•�.{ryF, (fN F it ri-I{{La t}. �. li. ..i ie i... ,.'.: tl i. .� �-
�f; i�' �c�t_i rt£S R,����D Ta .�1t4;�J rR, R wEelcLyf�oc4Rl� C-oG
r{c>a rroT R c�sPo�9 s :•!� AKG i 1199_ AIL t...:S'TEn ea CAt-EN0A2. kv- P��nP iEau�rE-
�� Na $ uQ- it S C�2AZ E►� Pr I%rj near T- 4-F fl &c7— A PPu cAa r i`o A/
W,N-E?tfgN 4 1t `( �ELoyL.l� AVD clvF/+sQ 1� is 3�
E s £5' e►e,� ��rTo�J T0 a e
19 pav- �-,\,J (-sly �sASrE �rAo SSKL- EAMPL£S, rs✓fP Gush r" i�C� p�n,_;tq�r J �tLoS
tea. f1V1r �PPr.�'�f� aa/ L,J1W.XAr DS 49 ►S J S Qv?_ V T't NA94LOoJ'kr
IS) iu-4a
LISE orally tl✓ AIR 9% _uTF_C,� Af£,1LO'ZD F V- vd tQSI 't' o 4, —
n"
94Reviewer/Inspector Name
, P !•�'I, i f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , A-- Date: -j •Z'Z 94
3/23/99

Fa-&1ity Number: a) — 34 Date of Inspection
Odor .Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to
discharge at/or below ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
10Yes
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes o
/❑
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, � Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ZNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan
belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes rNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes .00
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes ❑ No
it�ona omments an or rawinQs ! ; ,,t , ; ; ! {l
i irq.el.z,.°.t _i.zt: t.. ,2 t tt ,t ,it1. N, tt,i-,p Xr ly .. k,+., .-•It tt .rj�'t ,f3ts.tlL4h1{ �,,{N }+'l i'�i"f id Ilt�$a . -v AIM
i,,
%:�iil9t,,il�.
Z 9� GaF-,'Gc4 -
(SIX^ C—AL te*.V'oJ
G��
a4 `3 .i iJQQLa��b o►J A MJT se-- 61efk�
rj U A d- v4 A s P RR-1=� �d A D�� vE 3 �. a
?� P s: 13s
�q.
30 A,4 y we o C.9-A, J
y v.s,zr-P Jks�r AF- Vq C
?P-tP\ C—E-4- "s AS
�£cE,( y r \P 0, �N-ED ck1 (3) Tu RNZITa ki6P-��I �-- f I &-z!' '7i� Q41
`To iS" .V- MatOL- k j % M F—
3/23/99

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted N Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not Operatuona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: R1Y.I.Hayes.Farm...TDM#9....................................................................... County: Johnston RRO
Owner Name: R.M......................................... Hayes..........
....... Phone No: 938-SO30...........
Facility Contact: Raymond.Ha res............................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: 9.19.-202-2.7.91 .......................
Mailing Address: 444.Stricldands..Cxassraads.Rd.................................................... Euur..Qaks..N.0 ..................................................... 27524 ..............
Onsite Representative: R.AL Hayes................................................................................. Integrator: TH].!')f.Faxms.lnc....................................................
Certified Operator:l4xymond.3L...................... HayRS ................................................. Operator Certification Number: 18.4.7.2.............................
Location of Farm:
.............
axcn�.l.acatram:...Striciclamd.�xassrAa�d.Rd............................................
Latitude ©e©� ®�� Longitude ®e
urre n t: iju
E _ I', { _+ eslgn�t urrent i ' ;, esugn urgent,
Swore € „
r E Cattle =
0
;P uhtry> ECapacity Csapacrty Population
'flWCapacity ,PopuI_tonlF,
E ,Population E;`. �.�
;#Er ❑ Layer 10 Dairy
1,11:10 Non -Layer ❑ on- any
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to FiRis F
224MU
' E[`EIfF.fr.r:.tftii,.
�
Farrow o can ❑ t
'3'Err ❑ ter E { {
i
❑ Farrow to Feeder
gTotarquesign'=Ca achy 5,240
❑ Farrow to Finis
GIltS
,�
❑
Trot 1 SS 7,4 00
�� =z ;�, 7
�dEYr!
Boars
❑
i
( E t �, i
..
..�.:... .. ...�:. ..... .,...:
... :.�... .... .
.. .. .�,.,...,. ... ..
1, .aft.I ���..l F. <Eu.I 7,�,(.; <i<< t
�iE�F�I s
..p,,._._.....,..,a.�g
40,ield
�pray
Subsurface rams resen rea ianaber�ofLu
... ..a_t
j d ❑
��
rl�PArea
.o. e
Iomr"onds /iSoh❑w.SystemB
as a Management
�
uisenarges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Stnucture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............1.7.......................................................................................................................... ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back
8/27/2003

Printed on 8/27/2003
Facility Number: 51-34 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? []Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
H No
I t . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
H Yes
(3 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Cl No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
H No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
H No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
L7 NO:vititations-or.deficTencies:were•noted during.!iris visit. •You -Twill receive n .further.
. •.c6rxespbddek6 abut this:visit:.... ........::..................... .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

Printed on 8/27/2003
Facility Number: 51 _34 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 0 Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ® Yes 0 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 0 Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 0 Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ® Yes 0 No
_i
8/27/2003

® D' is'ion of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 20
Facility Number ;�� � y-1
Time of Inspection 1' 20 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered EYCertified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted [3 Not Operational Date Last
Operated:
Farm Name: ��rn L.............................................. County: UT42hlll:S.l�(V
............................................................................ ....q... c..}.................
.r......................................
.....
OwnerName:........../,...M.....................................4Yr°....................................... Phone No:.I..A...1.......1...�.7..:1... .......
FacilityContact: 04...Z!!.:.....t� �5....................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: K-{.'`►.;,tJ�TT r Gba S 6..( 5..90 ......�laY.... �.......a I J2.. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ..........'.^ .M..:1...'......................................I........................ Integrator:.......I...i�'. A.............................................................
Certified Operator .........i .A.J.......Cf................................................................. Operator Certification Number;.... ..................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude•
Design
Current
Design Current�� Design Current
CR;5vawe
Capaclty�
Population
Poultry Capacity Population CattlepacityPopalation .
an to Feeder
- ❑Layer
❑ Dairy
FZderto Finish
Non -Layer
_
❑Non Dairy
rrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to FinishIN
f
6 Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
r H.
❑ Boars
TO al t SLW
qq Nuimber ofLagoons
! Holding Ponds L__.�.J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
,,,�
"' 7 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®'No
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
UNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
51-No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ).
❑ Yes
9-No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ETN'o
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ONo
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
EdNo
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
d No
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
['No
7/25/97

Faclfity Number: 5
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 8;Ko
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes i"No
StructureUp Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: La oOM
.................. ................................................................................................................................................................................
...........
Freeboard(ft):.................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes GKo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes El'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes B<o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) l
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes [12<o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) ._ _ - nn
15. Crop type COM �.... w. � .. ' L ����in,�0..... 6�ry 11 s"►vi'C'L IC! r1 .:.O�hPa' Q..................
..................................� .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violations•ar deFiciencies. were noted -during this:visit. You.wift receive•no•ftirtlier :
OfrOspimWehO Ahoid this:visit:•: •' ..:. ; ...........
❑ Yes B-Ko
❑ Yes EVN' o
❑ Yes Vo
❑ Yes 5No
❑ Yes 2'�o
❑ Yes S11go
❑ Yes © o
❑ Yes [c <o
❑ Yes ®1Qo
❑ Yes RNo
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatures k/b, 'Kt- IM v►,(A Date: � A,-0my

ne
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
❑ Division of Water Quality
v... ate. i:G<..M '. 4 : f:s�. "At° 6 kxWf'k
Follow-un of DWO i
Facility Number / 3
Registered E3 Certified E3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
Farm Name:... (�?....... f y
.......................................................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
.............. County: .... L,%�Q.!�.%.�ti7.Tz!- v....................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:.......................... ........................................... .........................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:! -14-...' K........L N 4J� d't yl.... 4.yW Integrator: ............7—DR11-11 ...................................................
CertifiedOperator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number...................... ....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 6 " Longitude • 4 "
Subsurface Drains Present l Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
040
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
�YNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
VNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
P No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
O No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97
Continued
on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed''
❑ Yes �No
Structures (La2oons,11oldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
❑ Yes 0 No
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:........1.......................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(.ft):...... �d�............................................................................................... ............................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes .21"No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes No
(If in excessofWMPi�orunoff entering waters the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type /...� . . .......1................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP.)?
❑ Yes &No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes eNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
2rYes ❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes VNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes Z No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes gNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ZZNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes WNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.violations or.'de'rciencies.werenotedduring this:visit.• You:Will, recei've•no further:
correspondence about this;v MLI
-V TOIA.-
f j(fyC_
L T 7 0 ALTSA`)✓f9
e/LvP S , 0' A-UA T lfzS
W ,
�GvUJ v.(/ �E dF(�G�'Jilf G6}eZff- 2Iy9 15 /�/} UlAr7 5/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature- /''�j�i.�yG, ����� Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
(Division of Water Quality
larkoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DNVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection / o
Facility Number 71V Time of Inspection t 'i3a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Registered Certified C] Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ........... ....... M.............. l..cAy.r.j........... F4..�..................................... County: ............ ,.la. � ..n?.^........................................
Owner name ►�'l �/ Phone No: 3L — d % h
............................H ..f...........................................................................................1..........................................................
Facility Contact Y?- /t'1............. Yg es Title r" ........... Phone No: ........ ., ?9-A.0
MailingAddress: ........................................................................................................................... :............................. .................................................. ................
OnsiteRepresentative: .... e�..:fJ;�y� Y.�Q...........!A..N..�............................ Integrator:
..........................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number ...........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 6 "
£ j
n
DesigDO
Current
Destgiz Current b": s Design Current 4
Swute
C.apacity-Populatton
;Poultry * £ Capacity Population: Cattle £CapacttyPop»lahon
-]Wean to Feeder
u
❑ Layer Dairy
❑
❑ eder to Finish
Hq
# ❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other
❑ Farrow Feeder
to
Total Des><gn"Capac><ty'
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
15€`TotatSSLW
Number OfLagoons / Holdtng Ponds L ;`rSubsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
1�
r5 ^
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System.,
YY %
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
534o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ld'!vo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[3 ,
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
l 4N0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
.d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
(]rNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[.( No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
E No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
(R"'No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
E(No
LI No
7/25/97
Continued
on back

Faii�tity Number: s-r - 3 y
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
ONo
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure 1 Structure 3 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
5 Structure
6
Identifier:................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):.........3.:..Q............... ............ I....................... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
(Ko
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
52KNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
M40
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Mll o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
5;?No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type L a�4...........................a./Y...................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
N`A-❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
. ❑ Yes
[tfNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RN
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Eg*f,;o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
B"No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement? /ij/-
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
,a
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? %�1�7
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No. violationssor. deFiciencie's.were'noted during this.'Asit'. Vou:will rec'v&no further,:
'
correspot�dehce: about. L,' . ' ; : . :. . . :
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .Q� /�!a„s, /' Date: /0130

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
r
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Moutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of.I)WQ inspection 0 Folltm-up of DSAVC review 0 Other �
Dote oi' Inspection
:F:a:clity :Nlumber
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm :Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex: L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: ......................................................................................County:.ti J,:
.........................................
OwnerName :.... ......... C..:,l.......... HA.. 4t;� ........................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .................................................. ........ Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress:.............................................................................................................................................................................................. ......... .... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ......................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
p "6 ...r� p
Certified Operator: .....�....................... O orator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• ��"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
I.)ischarge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharoe is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes IQ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ko
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes
6 No
❑ Yes
[tNo
l❑AO
1-1Yes
Yes
❑ No
Continued
on hack

Facility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures ().,moons and/or Holdinv Ponds)
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes Q] No
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
l.d No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 . Structure S
..+.......•................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ONo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑hes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
VNo
Waste :application
1
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
[l1 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering w ters of the State, notify DWQ)
I5. Crop type (,?..td..... ........(1..�,.r................................................................................ ...........................................................
��'"'Y' 4 . ...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
,� Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility' have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? zj Yes', ❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes] No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes] No
For Certified Facilities Onl 1
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes !L! No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes V6 No
(i*Tla 41 Ail AwU 9 Q - N616D Tr��
ryv �VU . . �(Jvvo�
'6• #MWVb P.4,nly t-V 1&� 1p e
Reviewer/Inspector Name
F02 UEZ�Z
�� o A)
Fi0 (J1YJ� ��,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Iq/ 1"V11P ifl/ UAL_2�r_ Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessineut Unit
4/30/97

JI-I--14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER DUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Anenlon
Facility No. -
DIVISION OF'ENVTRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: D - a , 1995
Time: 0
Farm Name/Owner. h" 1-44 `? 2 1 - - " -- - -
Mailing Address:
County: �2 v h
Integrator 7_,D Phone: 2 3 a
On Site Revresentative: FAQA4r e t,ftoZe,,4 Phone:
Physical Address/Location: 5
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Caine
Design Capacity:. 2 `I Number of Animals on Site: 1,� ,
DEM Certification Number: ACE DELI Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: �5 ' Z Z ' Longitude: 71 'J ( 9 ' 0 2-" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient. freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approcimately 1 Foot + 7 inches)(`-%esor No Actual Freeboard: � S Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagooa(s)? Yes or�g Was any erosion observed? Yes or(&
Is adequate land available for spray'? or No Is the cover crop adequate? 9�r No
Crop(s) being utilized: f e) G.y l A.., 4-
Does the facility meet SCS minimuIIi setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 0 or No
_ 100 Feet from Wells? 9a or No
^e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line -Stream? Yes or�Q
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or 1
'a animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing, system, or other
-,imi;ar man-made devices?' Yes or if Yes. Please. Explain.
��t 1cs cnc facility maintain adequate waste managemcnt .records (volumes of ruanure, land applicd-
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes or 0/
Additional Comments: 1 Lr,4� ' Y 0q_1
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRo P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Aaentior-
Facility No. S/_
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: a 1 /2 C S , 1995
Time: �T �' i� M �Qr• q
c F-" k
Farm Name/Owner �_s 0h � _- r e �r -rdws_fi orY4S-
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator. M S v Phone:. 4°l9 / 7-43 -T-c rs ?
On Site Representative: Houle - yy,e t Phone: ,9Ll / €94/- Eris/7
Physical Address/Location: Hm* 70 l o -C-ss ll q-?
a�1ltdo,t 9a,a_,- 'st y x v I roG d o u ns s fnnz /�hQ h Liy B-4 6 i C h a rd .
Type of Operation: Swine _' Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 17 ZKI
DEM Certification Number: ACE
Number of Animals on Site.
DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: _ • Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 .inches) or No Actual Freeboard: :fit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(9 Was any erosion observed? Yes 04
Is adequate land available for spray? 0 or No Is the _cover crop adequate? D or No
Crop(s) being utilized: ;p qS-r-S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 0or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No u a /rna
NG U"r//S SevH
ne arimal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
aamal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No uq/rhvwN.
S`iha /� s'�eYta, f4 aP�y ara
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or orher
;OTri,a.r man-made devices? Yes org If Yes, Please Expl.airt. a o evrr4-a , in r7IVe,.
' ►+ c.s tic facility ritaintain adequate Waste mariagernent Teeords (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: fjr• on a - �� s. �� >to caK�r•K �ti Q FfaL,1 N� o N Jj,%.�r;s
[ps .. S ro(yX•p rrn �N7` sriF A
�d wgf/ Mof rhteavimrs ro r�G /g! N f a'�e '�T wit W114f.,
Sign' e
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

1W
TJ-3y
Agriment Services, Inc.
R&O,4 1011a(rs- �~[/
Appendix 3. Worksheet for sludge volume and treatment volume
Revised August 2008
The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge -free) treatment zone (are
determined from information on the Lagoon Sludge Survey Form (Item 0 and P, respectively). If the lagoon has a
designed sludge storage volume, see notes at end of the Worksheet. The dimensions of the lagoon as
measured and the side slope are needed for calculations of sludge volume and of total treatment volume. If the
lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge volume and treatment volume in the lagoon can be estimated by
using standard equations. For approximate volumes of rectangular lagoons with constant side slope, calculate
length and width at the midpoint of the layer, and multily by layer thickness to calculate layer volume. For irregular
shapes, convert the total surface area to a square or rectangular shape. For exact volumes for lagoons with
constant side slope, the "Prismoidal Equations" may be used.
Lagoon
1 Average Sludge Layer Thickness (T) :
3.47 ft.
2 Depth of lagoon from top of bank to bottom soil surface (D) :
11.60 ft.
3 Slope = horizontal/vertical side slope (S) :
3.00
4 Length at top inside bank (L) :
476.00 ft.
5 Width at top inside bank (W):
275.00 ft.
6 Length at midpoint of sludge layer (Lm) = L - 2 S (D - (T/2)) :
416.41 ft.
7 Width at midpoint of sludge layer (Wm) = W - 2 S (D - (T2)) :
216.41 ft.
8 Volume of sludge (Vs) = Lm Wm T:
312,700.05 fts
9 Volume in gallons Vsg = V (7.5 gal.M3) :
2,345,250.37 gal.
10 Thickness of existing liquid tmt. zone (Y)
3.63 ft.
11 Thickness of total treatment zone (Z) = T + Y
7.10 ft.
12 Length at midpoint of total tmt. zone Lz = L - 2(S)(D-(Z/2)
427.30 ft.
13 Width at midpoint of total tmt. Zone Wz = W - 2(S) (D -(Z/2)
227.30 ft.
14 Volume of total treatment zone (Vz) = Lz Wz Z
689,589.56 W
15 Ratio ( R) of sludge layer volume to total Treatment volume R = Vs/Vz
0.45
If the ratio exceeds 50%, than a sludge Plan of Action maybe required. Check with DWQ for information on
filinq the Plan of Action.
Note: If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from both the volume of
sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment zone (Vz) (Item 14), and take the ratio:
16 Design sludge storage volume (DSSV)
17 Ratio (R) of sludge layer volume to treatment volume adjusted for (DSSV).
Lagoon Identification: RM Hayes (1) Date
Completed by: Ronnie G. Kennedy _
Print Name
0.45
12110/2014
Hi Q
3 of 3

Agriment Services, Inc.
Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form Revised August 2008
A. Farm Permitor DWQ Identification Number: _ — 51-34
B. Lagoon identification: RM Hayes (1)
C. Person(s) taking Measurements: > Jonathan Miller
D. Date of Measurements:
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
12/10/2014
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Sonar Boat
b. Distance form the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom soil of lagoon: Range Pole
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler": nla
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside to of bank): --- 3.00
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on separate sheet, list dimensions and calculate surface area. The lagoon may have
been built different than designed, so measurements should be made.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acre, use 8 points:
b. If more than 1.33 acre, surface area acres x 6 = sampling points, with a maxium of
24: 18
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of intersection as the estimated
number of sampling points needed. Number the intersection points on the lagoon grid so that data recorded at each
can be easily matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet' (Appendix 2). Also, at the location of the
pump intake, take measurement of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge layer and record it on the
Data Sheet (last row); this must be at least 2.6 ft. when irrigating.
At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present
Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): — 1.15
J. Determine distance from top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records): — 1.60
K. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records): > 2.80
L Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid Level
(Item K - Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level): — 1.65
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): - — 8.75
N. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top
of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): — 5.28
0. Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the Sludge Layer: b 3.47
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N - Item L): 163
Q. If Item O is greater than Item P, proceed to the Worksheet for Sludge Volume and Treatment Volume. If Item
O is equal to or less than Item P, you do not have to determine volumes.
r
Completed by: Ronnle G. Kennedy
Print Name % Sign r
1 of 3

Agriment Services, Inc.
Appendix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon Identification: RM Hayes (1)
Completed by: Ronnie G. Kennedy
Print Name
Revised August 2008
Date: 12/10/2014
��Si�gnat
(A)
Grid Point
No.
A
Distance from liquid surface to
top of sludge
(C)
Distance from liquid surface to
lagoon bottom (soil)
(C) - A
Thickness of sludge la
layer
g y
Feet (tenths)
Feet (tenths)
Feet (tenths)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
# of points
with readings
1857
x
x
Average of
points
5.28
8.75
3.47
At pump
intake
4.20
x
x
*Ali Grid Points and corresponding sludge laver thickness must be show on a sketch attached to this Sludge Survey
Data Sheet.
2of3

L.
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
•iN�x�AYw_
Y Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission - Steve Troxier, Commissioner of Agriculture

�0F W aTFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor /}
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
c 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
~ Coleen H. Sullins Director
O 'C
Division of Water Quality
August 11, 2008
R Hayes
Creekside Farms
1646 Stricklands Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Subject: Sludge Compliance Requirement Change
Dear Permittee:
E14f �A,
FILE
In accordance with Condition II1.19 of State General Permit AWG100000, your facility is
required to maintain compliance regarding sludge accumulation in your animal waste treatment
lagoon(s). As you know, the previous compliance limit was to have a minimum of four (4) feet
of treatment depth between the designed stop pump and the average elevation of the top of the
sludge blanket. This requirement was based on NRCS Standard No. 359, which was recently
modified.
As of July 2008, Standard No. 359 does not use the 4-foot requirement. Sludge compliance is
now to be based on the sludge volume as a percentage of the total treatment volume. The revised
Standard states that sludge accumulation in the permanent treatment zone must be less than 50%
of the planned treatment volume. Also, there must be a minimum of 2.5 feet of liquid above the
sludge at the pump intake location. If either of these conditions is not met then sludge must be
removed or managed in accordance with an approved Plan of Action for Lagoon Sludge
Reduction (POA). A new sludge survey worksheet has been developed to calculate sludge and
treatment volumes to determine compliance.
Our records indicate that you have filed a Sludge POA for one or more of the lagoons at your
facility. Based on the changes to the sludge requirements in Standard No. 359, your lagoon(s)
may already be in compliance without any sludge removal. Using your lagoon design (or as -
built information) and current sludge survey measurements, complete the NEW sludge survey
worksheet. If you have any difficulty in locating or understanding your lagoon design
information, please contact your technical specialist or county Soil & Water office.
NNo `hCarolina
aturally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
lnternet: www.newaterguality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 60% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Send both sludge' survey worksheets, OLD and NEW, to the address below if you feel that your
lagoon(s) is in compliance and wish to withdraw your POA. Our staff will review the
information and notify you of our decision.
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
If you have any questions about the new sludge requirement, sludge survey worksheet, or any
related matter please feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-
3221.
Sincerely,
Tal &-� �-
Keith Larick, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - AWS510034

R M Hayes
Creekside Farms
1646 Stricklands Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Dear R M Hayes:
Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
DivisionofWater Quality
July 1, 2007JON
l � tG 1F11 R� �0 ill�t OFFICE
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510034
Creekside Farms
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
In accordance with your application received on 4-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to R M Hayes, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land applicatibn of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Creekside Farms, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 5320 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition IU.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatMuality.org Vocation: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAf irmatNe Action Employer— 50% Recyded110°% Post Consumer Paper
NOne Carolina
Naturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 "telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as- a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS510034

Re: NOV Letter RM Hayes
Subject: Re: NOV Letter RM Hayes
From: Buster Towell <buster.towel I @ncmail. net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:21:03 -0500
To: Geno Kennedy <[e-mail]>,
Zimmerman <JAY.ZIMMERMAN{a ncmail.net>
Geno:
"jane.bernard" <[e-mail]>, Jay
Yes, in fact the RRO di receive a copy of that WUP but, the NOV was sent mainly due
to the fac that RM had waste that got off site.
Also, the Johnston SWCD had the WUP that stated that those fields were honey wagon
fields. The APS Central Office had the very same WUP and so did the RRO.
Now to make thing even worse, your new plan has the pulls actually going in
different directions than what RM pulled on the dates in question. If RM had had
that plan and had followed it there is no way he could have sprayed on the
complaintants property.
As.far as I am concerned the NOV will stand.
Buster
Geno Kennedy wrote:
Buster,
I saw a copy of the NOV letter for RM Hayes. Did you receive a mailed copy of a
waste plan modification that was made (5/31/06, 8/22/06) to show that RM could
use a traveling gun system in the areas previously designated for use with a
honeywagon. I thought we had mailed a copy to you and to Johnston Soil and
Water. Please advise as the letter does not indicate in item one that this
change was officially noted.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie "Geno" Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518
Office [phone] Fax [phone] Mobile [phone]
www.agrimentservices.com
I of 1 7/30/2007 10:46 AM

Re: inspection RM Hayes
imap:Hcros.ncmail.net:993/fetch%3EUID%3E/Sent%3E 128?header=...
Subject: Re: inspection RM'Hayes
From: Jane Bernard <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:12:54 -0400
To: Geno Kennedy <[e-mail]>
Mr. Kennedy,
I had left message that I would be at Mr. Hayes farm on Friday, August 3rd, at
9:30. This is just for his annual compliance inspection for Water Quality. I will
verify that Mr. Hayes has moved the Traveling Gun in field UN1 to comply with the
waste Plan Dated 8/22/06 and submitted to the RRO on 6/27/07. If for some reason
August 3rd is not acceptable please let me know.
Jane Bernard
Geno Kennedy wrote:
I Mrs. Bernard,
Please contact me for scheduling of RM Hayes Inspection. My number is
910-289-0395. Thanks and'look forward to meeting you.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie "Geno" Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518
Office [phone] Fax [phone] Mobile [phone]
www.aarimentservices.com
Jane Bernard <jane.bernard(cr�,ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist Raleigh Regional Office
DWQ Aquifer Protection Section
1 of 1 7/30/2007 10:45 AM

eud4ae g054 �&�, lox,
1646 sadewd'Q Rd
go" Oa6, Ze 27524
919- 915- 5494
July 12, 2007
Mr. S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Environmental Regional Supervisor
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Re: Notice of Violation
NCA251034 — Johnston County
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
I am writing in response to your certified letter concerning the notice of violation.
In May of 2006, I talked with my private technical specialist and asked him to change the
honey wagon designated fields so that I could use the hard hose traveler to spray with.
This information was sent to your office about a week or so ago. If there was any
spray/drift off these designated areas, I truly apologize for causing any offsite impact.
The property owners never consulted me as far as there being a problem. I was unaware
until I was contacted by your office. I would like to express that the complainant in the
past worked for me and left on negative terms.
I would ask that the Division take in account the offsite impact that was noted during this
infraction. I would ask that the Division treat this case as a permit condition infraction
over, more serious offsite impact violations and discharges.
Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter.
Sin erVly,
R. M. Hayes
CC: Mr. Buster Towell
JUL I 6 W
DEr11 ,- A A
EG - ._t
-,� -... 101jq 0Frrc

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R. M. Hayes
Creekside Farms
1646 Stricklands Crossroads Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 5, 2007
Subject: Notification of Violation
NCA251034
Johnston County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Dear Mr. Hayes:
Buster Towell and Jane Bernard of The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) responded to a complaint
on June 21, 2007. It was reported that Mr. Hayes had exceeded his boundaries causing spray/drift off
site on June 16 and June 19 of 2007. Upon further investigation the following items were observed.
Tract 553 field designated as UN in your Waste Utilization Plan is designated for use with a
honey wagon. The traveling gun was still connected and in the field. The field had tracks from
the traveling gun showing two separate pulls.
2. The traveling gun had been placed improperly causing spray/drift off site. The traveler had been
positioned, in a way that spray/drift was reaching a residential well and dwellings not owned by
Mr. Hayes.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within ten days of your receipt. The Aquifer Protection Section
staff will review the information submitted and make a determination as to what further action, if any,
may be required in this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact Buster Towell or Jane Bernard at [phone].
Sincerely,
FS�y Zimmerman, L.G.
Environmental Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
t
Carolina
Aquifer Protection Section -Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
3800 Barrett Dr. Internet: h2o.enr.state.no-us FAX [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

imap://buster. [e-mail] il.net:993/f...
Subject: RM Hayes
From: Geno Kennedy <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: Buster Towell <[e-mail]>
CC: Jewel Hayes <[e-mail]>
Hey Buster,
Sorry we have to correspond over an NOV at RM Hayes. RM called today and was asking about the
spray area in question where the infraction occured. Our records indicate that we did a wettable acre
det (5/31/06) on those particular fields to convert them from honeywagon fields to be wetted with
traveleling gun system. There was a follow up waste addendum done on 8/22/06 officially
incorporating this change. I will be glad to send copies via email or fax for your review.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie "Geno" Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518
Office [phone] Fax [phone] Mobile [phone]
www.agrimentservices.com
1 of 1 6/22/2007 7:48 AM

(f9rs9 #
-C7 �-- H-wv&)

imap://j [e-mail]:143/fe.,
Becky Allenbach
To; Doug Mundrick/R4/USEPA/USBEPA, Arthur
10/30/03 02:21 PM Collina/R4/USEPA/US®EPA, Alfreda Freeman/R4/USEPA/USOEPA,
David Parker/R4/USEPA/US®EPA, Connie
Roberts/R4/USEPA/US®EPA
CC: Cheryl Mcmenamin/R4/USEPA/USQEPA
Subject: Region 4 Tips and/or Complaints
Becky B. Allenbach, Chief
Enforcement 6 Compliance
Planning & Analysis Section
[phone]
[phone] (Eax)
Allenbach.BeckyUepa.gov
----, forwarded by Becky Allenbach/R4/USEPA/US on 10/30/2003 02:21 PM
no.reply.oecafeedback®epam
ail.epa.gov To: Becky Allenbach/R4/USEPA/US®EPA
CC:
10/26/2003 10:47 AM Subject: Region 4 Tips and/or Complaints
The following is feedback from the OECA web site. You will NOT be able
to reply to this messages
It was sent to the following recipients: allenbach.hecky9epa.gov
Please use the following address (provided by the user) when responding
to this message: Rally hrooklCayahoo.com
Name: Mr$.Nielsen
Reply via Rally brookl0?yahoo.com
email to:
Referring http://www.epa.gov/compliance/complaints.html 1] C7
Page:
Subject: Region 4 Tips and/or Complaints
Telephone [phone]
Number:
Alleged Raymond Hayes �J 7
Violators
Name:
'7 c,
Alleged 494 Stricklands Crossroads Four Oaks NC 27524 S v�
Violators
Address:
Tip/Camplaint: Mr. Hayes has on numerous occasions sprayed our pond and property with
hog waste, in the act of this, the fish in the pond have died, the
wildlife and game that feed from this pond, no longer exeist. He has
violated environmental laws, I have tried for the past three years to
bring closure to this large problem however the politics of this small
town and the demands and political protection of hog farmers has left the
situation unresolved. Mr. Hayes irrigation system allows the waste to
drain into nearby streams contaminating the water supplies that maintain
the wildlife here, he also leaves his dead pits exposed and open, the
smell is breath taking and only when he asked to withdraw from this abuse
does he act in a responsible concerned manner, which this last only a few
days until he feels safe that the EPA will not step in and condem his
Operations. I am seeking some help in protecting our community against
Mr. Hayes environmental abuse. Thank you
2 of 3 12/ 19/2003 9:32 AM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
pF W A rER William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`OCR QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
j [ Division of Water Quality
September 10, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R. M. Hayes
1646 Sticklands Crossroads Mill Road
Four Oaks, N.C. 27524
Subject: Request for farm records
Creekside Farms
Facility 51-34
Permit No. NCA251034
Dear Mr. Hayes:
On August 28, 2003, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office contacted you to request copies of the
farm waste irrigation application records and lagoon analysis for the period of July 14 through November
14, 1999. You should be aware that the animal waste permit AWS510034 in effect at that time includes
the following condition:
IV. INSPECTIONS
Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the DWQ may, upon presentation of
credentials and in accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures. enter and ins pec,
any property, premises or place on or related to the collection, treatment, storage and land application
system at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect
and obtain a copy of any records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; and
may obtain samples of the animal waste, groundwater, soii, plant tissue, or surface water,
Please provide the requested records within ten (10) days of receipt of this request. Thank you for your cooperation.
If you should have any questions or desire further information please contact John Hunt at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely;
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Anita LeVeaux, Dept. of Justice
Jeremy Hill, Premium Standard Farms, Inc.
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Rai6igh, NC 27699-1628
phone [phone]
facsimile [phone]
Customer Service
1-800-623-7748
CDENrt

o�o'r w a rF,9�
g-ERT
IFIED MAIL September I U, 2003
T
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
iam G, Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environmlient and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P,E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. R. M. Hayes
1646 Sticklands Crossroads Mill Road
Four Oaks, N.C. 27524
Subject: Request for farm records
Creekside Farms
Facility 51-34
Permit No. NCA 2 51 WAA
Dear I
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
A. Signature
On At
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
X
0 Agent
0 Print your name and address on the reverse
0 Addressee
B. Received by (Pnnted Name)
C. Date of Delivery
farm N so that we can return the card to you.
14 1 c
E Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
the fol
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is de4vary address different hornitem 1?
❑ Yes
1. Aie Addressed to:
r#tc
if YES. enter delivery address betow:
❑ No
IV. "
creder
MR R i41 HAYES
any pn
1640 STRICKLANDS CROSSROADS MILL RD
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
3. Service Type
S Y 5terr
Request for Farm reeords.Johnston Co.9/10/03 1H
0 Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
and off?
NCA251Q34 Creekside Farms Facility 51-34
❑ Registered ❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise
may or
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Deiivery? {Extra Fee)
Cl Yes
Please X
2. Article Number 7003
0500 0000 4294 5346
If you s'i
(rrenster from service label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02•M•1035
Sincerely;
r
NORTH GAROLINA t7EPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
r RALEIGH REGIONAL
OFFICE
1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
INCDERVR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1628
?003 0500 0000 4294 5546
MIt It M I [AYES
1646 STRICKLANDS CROSSROADS MILL KID
FOUR OAKS NC 27524

DAVID M. ROUSE LAW OFFICES
DAVID M. ROUSE, ATTORNEY
E-Mail: [e-mail]
KEITH D. ROUSE, ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
E-Mail: [e-mail]
312 East Walnut Street
Goldsboro, NC 27530
P. O. Box 1816
' fu,
Goldsboro, NC 27533-1816
1--- -
Telephone: [phone]
f
Fax: [phone]
June 25, 2003
Mr. John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Dear Mr. Hunt:
I need to speak with you about a matter that you investigated (FN-51-34) on or about
September 22, 1999.
Please give me a call. You may call me at 1-800-474-8990.
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
I
avid M. Rouse
DMR/mej

._
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 13, 2003
R.M. Hayes
Creekside Farms
1646 Stricklands Crossroads Road
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA251034
Creekside Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear R.M. Hayes:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on February 5, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to R.M. Hayes, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS510034 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Creekside Farms, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 5320 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeyina
and 'monitoring conditions in_ this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
AF®R
Internet http://h2a.enr.state.nc.tis/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

A .I
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or Iimitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless.such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle McKay at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) s` o to
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
LU
Permit File NCA251034 L
Permit File AWS510034 Jr
NDPU Files �`� w

State of North CarolinaTlilvDepartment of Environment
and Natural Resources.
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor;`
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary u
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
FEB 2, 3
.NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 21, 2001
Mr. R. M. Hayes ;)FHr4K 11ALuUn RCUIOVAL OFFICE CERTIFIED MAIL
Hayes Farm TDM #9 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
494B Stricklands Crossroad Road
Four Oaks, NC 27509
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Making an Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit
Farm # 5 l -34
Johnston County
File No. DV 0047
Dear Mr. Hayes:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against the R. M. Hayes Farm TDM
#9 in the amount of $4,369.78 which includes $369.7.8 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy
of the assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Any continuing violation(s)
may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
Mauling Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrtp: //h2o. enns tale. nc. us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16.17
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous. violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for.the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan McLawhorn
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
ATTACHMENTS
cc: erg- chuster, RRO Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
John Hunt, RRO w/ attachments
File # DV 00-047 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 00-047
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 14,369.78 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, February 21, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF
RAYMOND M. HAYES
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE
WATERS OF THE STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
WITHOUT A PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-047
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, 1, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Raymond M. Hayes owns and operates the R. M. Hayes Farm TDM #9, a swine
operation located in Johnston County.
B. Raymond M. Hayes was reissued Certificate of Coverage AWS510034 under
General Permit AWG 100000 for the R. M. Hayes Farm TDM #9 on June 26,
1998, effective June 26, 1998, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003. This
permit does not allow the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
C. On or about February 22, 2000, in response to a citizen complaint, DWQ staff
observed a discharge of wastewater by the R. M. Hayes Farm TDM #9 from a
sprayfield to a farm pond on neighboring property.
D. Raymond M. Hayes had no valid permit for the above -described activity.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $369.78.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
Il. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Raymond M. Hayes is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).

B. The farm pond on neighboring property constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6). `"'Waters" means any
stream, river, brook, swamp, lake, sound, tidal estuary, bay, creek, reservoir,
waterway, or other body or accumulation of water, whether surface or
underground, public or private, or natural or artificial, that is contained in, flows
through, or borders upon any portion of this State including any portion of the
Atlantic Ocean over which the State has jurisdiction."
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. Raymond M. Hayes may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Raymond M.
Hayes pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282. I (b)(8).
F. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Raymond M. Hayes is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$_ _ o 0o for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ � Q 0 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is —4-Q— percent of
the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 369.78 Enforcement costs
$ ai.N.n S TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;

(2) '. he duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
- _1-1Lo\
A:�: - - -- --
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF
HAYES FARM TDM #9
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET )
TO THE WATERS OF )
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA )
PERMIT NO. AWS510034 )
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV
FINDINGS AND
ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to the delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, I, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), make the following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Hayes Farm TDM #9 is a business organized and existing under the laws of the State of
North Carolina.
B. On September 15, 1997, Mr. R. M. Hayes was issued a Certificate of Coverage (COC)
authorizing the operation of Hayes Farm TDM #9. The COC authorizes the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in
accordance with General Permit AWS510034. On May 18, 1998 a revised general permit
was reissued. Pursuant to this COC, Mr. R.M. Hayes is authorized and required to operate
the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General
Permit, the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), and the COC,
with no discharge of wastes to surface waters.
C. On February 22, 2000, Charles Alvarez of the Raleigh Regional Office responded to a
citizen's complaint concerning runoff from spray irrigation at the above named facility. The
runoff from the field flowed into a drainage pipe and proceeded into a farm pond
downstream. Nutrient samples were taken to determine whether animal waste had
discharged from the spray field; these samples were analyzed by the Division of Water
Quality Lab on Reedy Creek Road. The sample reports showed high levels of ammonia and
Kjeldahl Nitrogen coming off the spray field indicative of animal waste. Runoff samples
from the field showed ammonia and Kjeldahl Nitrogen levels at 360 mg/l and 400 mg/l
respectively. Background levels for ammonia should be less than 2.0 mg/l. On March 1,
2000, approximately 150 dead fish ( bream and catfish ) were observed in the above
mentioned pond. The farm pond and stream are an unnamed tributary to Hannah Creek and
are classified as C NSW waters within the Neuse Basin.

D. A Notice of Violation\Intent To Enforce was issued on March 15, 2000 as a result of the
above referenced discharge to waters of the State.
E. Hayes Farm TDM #9 had no valid permit for the above described discharge of wastewater
to waters of the State.
F. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter total $@@@@@@.
G. On October 12, 2000, John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office received and responded to
a complaint of excessive waste water applied to a spray field at the R.M. Hayes swine farm.
Upon investigation of the complaint Mr. Hunt determined that indeed an excessive amount
of wastes were applied to the field resulting in ponding and runoff of wastes across an access
road shared by other land owners beyond the spray field receiving the wastes. There was
evidence of the runoff across the path and along an adjacent ditch, but it was determined that
the wastes most likely did not reach waters of the state. The RRO was never notified of the
event by Mr. Hayes or any representative for this farm as is required by the General Animal
Waste Permit No. AWS510034.
H. A Notice of Violation was sent on November 9, 2000 for the hydraulic over application and
for the failure to notify as required by the permit. Mr. Hayes submitted records as requested,
but these did not provide any additional information which would substantiate the violation.
Based upon the above Findings of fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Hayes Farm TDM #9 is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S.
143-215(4).
B. The farm pond and unnamed tributary to Hannah Creek constitute waters of the State within
the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The discharge in February 2000 constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1 (a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
D. Hayes Farm TDM #9 may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required, but fails to
apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Hayes Farm TDM #9
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3 (a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.I(b)(8).

F. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Hayes Farm TDM #9 is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ For making an outlet to waters of the State in violation of NCGS 143-
215.1(a)(1) on February 22, 2000.
$ Enforcement Costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: (DV) Making on Outlet to Surface Waters without a Permit
Violator: Hayes Farm TDM #9
Mr. R. M. Hayes
494B Stricklands CrossRoads Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina 27509
Regional Office: Raleigh
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural, resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation: The wastewater runoff flowing into the pond
and stream resulted in the death of approximately 150 fish.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: Waste application to the spray field occurred over
several hours and the runoff of wastes continued to enter the pond fasces after the
irrigation event.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality: Water quality is
impacted due to oxygen consuming waste and pathogenic bacteria from this discharge. This
discharge is likely to affect in stream biota by 1) lethal and sub lethal and by 2) lowering of
reproductive output. NH3-N toxicity is also possible, and approximately 150 fish were
killed.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: Unknown. Runoff was due to over application.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: Irrigation of wastes requires fuel for
pumping and time for an operator to operate the equipment. As a result of over applications
the operator could potentially save some time in the future as a result of not having to
operate the equipment numerous times as opposed to less frequently but for longer events.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally: Neither could be determined
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
In response to a citizen's complaint, Mr. Charles Alverez of the Raleigh Regional Office
e I I4

8. The cost to the State of the enforcement action:
Charles Alverez: 10 hours @ $22.87 = S 228.70
Beth Barnes: 3 hours @ $ @@@@@@@
John Hunt: 8 hours @ $23.77 = S 190.16
Mileage: (2 trips) 242 miles @ #0.325/mi. _ $ 78.65
Laboratory: @@@
Ken Schuster:
Administrative costs:
Total:
100.00
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e. individual v. corporation): Feeder to
Finshing swine production; 5240 head.
10. Violators degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) or recalcitrance:
Mr. Hayes has installed tile drainage for the field involved in the February event. He has
_--&Imwfs supplied records and other information as requested in a timely manner.
11. Mitigating circumstances: none
12. Assessment factors:
a) IWC -approximately 100% when illegal discharges occur, depending upon amount of
flow in the unnamed tributary at the time...
b) Receiving waters - farm pond and unnamed tributary to Hannah Creek
c) SOCIJOC status - NA
d) copy of MP screen - NA
e) copy of limits page in permit - NA
f) Damage - approximately 150 fish (bream and catfish) killed
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information in this report is true to the best of my knowledge.

R.M. HAYES
494 B STRICKLAND CROSSROADS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
[phone]
11 /29/00
Mr. John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Hunt,
AFC
-'
r
This memo was generated to satisfy the ten-day response from the NOV letter dated Nov
9, 2000. You visited my farm on 10/12/00 per yet another complaint on my farm. I do
not agree with your determination that excessive waste were ponded and ran across the
farm path. My girlfriend and I investigated the same area to make sure there was no
waste entering the farm path that same day. October was extremely dry and I utilized my
water truck several times along the farm path to hold down the dust. We use this same
truck for commercial operation when compacting and building roads. This truck will
apply water at a rate to cause severe ponding in low-lying areas. I am certain we used the
truck several times around that date. Could the ponding have been due to the use of the
water truck? Did you take samples that would indicate the ponded water was indeed
swine waste? As you are aware I have been complained on more than one time, most of
which involved my ex-wife. I am sorry that you are dragged constantly in old domestic
disputes; however it seems I am the one that gets burned most of the time. My ex-wife
will do anything she thinks will cause me problems. Please take this into consideration
the next time she calls. I will continue to inspect application areas during events so that
no runoff occurs. Please re-evaluate your assessment of ponded waste if there is no
scientific evidence that the ponding you saw was swine waste. If you have any questions
please give me a call.
With Kind Regards,
R.M. Hayes
Owner

RM. HAYES
494 B STRICKLAND CROSSROADS RD.
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
(919)934--0106
t0I31/00
Mr. John Hunt
Division of Water lit
3800 Barrett Drive Quality
u le 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Hunt,
Per your request I am forwarding a copy of my most recent pumping records. If you have any questions
please let me know.
With Kind Regards,
R.M. Hayes
Owner

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
553
Field #: unl
4.8
Flow Rate = 135
R.M.HAYES
6920 DEVILS RACETRACK RD.
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
[phone]
Facility Number 1 51-34
Irrigation Operator R.M. HAYES
Irrigation Operators 6920 DEVILS RACETRACK RD.
Address FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
Operators Phone # [phone]
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type BERMUDA HAY Recommended PAN BERMUDA HAY
Loading Qblecre) = (B)400
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
I
PAN Applied Nitrogen
1000
Hours
Remaining..-
Inches
..
..
ml Owners Signature
Totals ! �I I I
Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification Number
NCDA Waste Anaylsis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
" Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) Following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record FIELD #A- LANE #1
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycie
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
1188
1 Field #: A
2.15
Fiow Rate = 135
R.M.HAYES
6920 DEVILS RACETRACK RD.
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
919) 93"106
Facility Number 1 51-34
Irrigation Operator EFOUR
YES
Irrigation Operator s VILS RACETRACK RD,
AddressAKS, NC 27524
Operator's Phone #4-0106
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type BERMUDA HAY Recommended PAN BERMUDA HAY
Loading Oblacre) = (B) 400
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (1 1)
PAN Applied Nitrogen
1000 r
Hours
Inches
•.-
Voturne
Owner's Signature
Totals
Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification Number
NCDA Waste Anayisis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

DEC-I6-BE 12[8E PM AGRIMHNT BERVICES INC. 12025602750
P.0t
It
I
rt
$�t
fIA
��99
1
II
4

NiiiiT
V AWUMK 4300 41 m* rtVOI� �V
�'...WaasiteAnaiysisRiort
i,'�Z$Pdf3
m e lem
PMuft million unl
Cq AM
517
52.0 946
ODTota1
N 1l am Code.
4WH
N
In AIS
-Iw
No Ali
N Awiptlom
a"
f 5a3
14 Sr%e Law. - o
1tm
I
16465tr&2nc Crowmta Rd
Four Oaks. NC 27524
Farm:
bran Count
Fe m in cu $
4.62 034 1.03 0.52 z16
NierlWC. Doug
-Ff-LMKROMFC W a P2t6 K2U ca IV 5 a Mi In Ca B At Cl N9 M Cd Pb III Se Li
kT*ion 2.2 1x70 7 6 0.60 0.11 016 003 T MOT T OA1 4S
x
`" �sie prod con�:n5 a largearreeuu of 9ocfiurn Ns ele -wm tar amumu.-O it sots where i1 rga4es cajun and OO bitesto esters wU irn nlalr 5o refouM of s+ansitae on
w ~nets the wage is a LOU I aro ied In ararllead -m ansyans At Axsodi.ir aorunulmion it me sail %hnTe wne is 2&-_ e-
w
U
}
Qt
w
H
2
W
E
M
1.7
Q.
E
a.
U)
M
N
tt)
I4
1
�0
-
U
W

f+DR� �q47 la�ppp Liqulrl !ri➢elYpo Fwids Rarxnd � � �� �
One Fam Ib Each Field psr C4" Oym
%aid i
Fuld Skas(sasq = p)
Famr
OwnersAOdraw
lies
I Fkeld E A
f7lCity Fkr tw 51•Sd
AYE
DEVILSPA�7AACKRD.
MOOS R AKS. M2Sa
9344MOrahPharR#
7oO#
2.15
Fl w Rats' 135
RAN HOW
MMDEVLSRACETRIkCKRD
UROAKSNC27S2d
#"EOb
m
ti
N
ID
�D
N
N
In
N
.r
U
z
CO)
W
U
W
In
z
W
E
E
a
N
to
ID
I
Fn m Wads Udbldm Plat
C� TYPs BEAMJDA HAY I Raaomamvic"d "N 9EINAUVA FAY
111 l21 al (M fm r61 fT (81 rot toln ell$
r
®
ICarm,�����®
i�r�rrrrrr■rrr■r�
�■■��rrrr�r�■r
�■rrrrr■rr■r�ar���rr
�rr■�r�rr■r��rr
�rrrrr�r�rr�r��
r��■r��■rr��r
rr■r�■r�r■r�rrrr�■���
a■rr■�rr�■�arr
rr�rrrr�r���
rr■r����rrrrr
�r�rr■r■rrr��r■�
irrr■■��N■rr�r��ri
rr�rrr�rrrrr�rsrr�
rr�rsrr��rrr
rrrrr�rr■r�r■rrrr
�rrrr��rr�rr■rri
rr��rrrrrrrrrr��r�r
r■rr��rr■rr�■r■�
���rr■■r■rrrrr
rrrr�r�rrrrrr■r■r
Owners Ssmftm Operamra SklIrrsas
U - Cerslrad ClDerspr IAdnq - - - Opaeam Armooftn Munber
W
A - MC�II►wo.��Ir�war�4Ra►>tuers�rr.e� res,�,r orransr,�on.
eR.r rls..w. ns�hsu bl► al�lerormlrlo aolon�er (m) if as,. a� . l�b*►wl�.oea.�� t+�.r�ar «I�.t�? arae'ris!rML

lMcbMsim
.430O� -- f W NC 276W-fiW
M217MM5
Grier:
, R. k
ROMFt
W. 0 -
2
NO- Last Cr4p
p Berm HayRasM
r
or Year
1S1Crop-, affm HRjjp ,M
2nd Cr . Berm HaVlPas.W
inv
cT
0
N
180-220
180.220
05-
0
0
1w
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
12
12
Ie
Test Rewl1s
Soil cim NVV CEC74
MIN 1.02 1.32
56
77.0
P-1 K r
1.3 63 225 177
C62
49.0
W
11.0
071
195
1
72
al zn-
72 122
Z"I
ins
a
162
S 1
28
S4
PXM WNAra
02
Field QoM[icm
Iied Li
Reoomaunkions
E 8orw; l-apfPas, M
r
I
or Yew
1st crop: aam Hayft,M
2nd Crop,Berm ,M
Ilse
UT
0
'.8o-220
180-220
5
0
0
30-50
30.50
IWO ZZ
0 0
0 0
Zn
0
0
8
Afng
0
0
12
�2
Test Its
W1 Class HAfi16 WN CfC
MIK L.76 1.28 6.7
M
78.0
Ac PN P-1 K-1
1.5 5.8 337 90
Cad
590
12.0
W/ A&F-W (1) Mh-W t2j Zn-1
129 87 87 538
Z"i
38
CU-1
145
S-1
30
-94
WN fY ;
Ab
Ao
Field Irdormgt'km
I ed Li
'tens
F Gomfrain
or aar
5stcrop: Small Grains
2nd tr :
AT
W100
s
50-70
0
0 0
0
0
3
Test. Results
.1 lass QEC
MIN 0336 1.25 5.9
78.0
,4c pK Rl K-1
1.4 5.5 33 220
Ca1lL
36.0
210
Alin-
30
,Il (i)Abt
28
1(2 n-!76Al
67
67
CO
t0
1
58
AfO-M Adfi iY
0.2

_ .. .. - _. -r ....__.-_. T--�-.r....-:.-- .-r..!�-H�-r-:-3'.�s .-r _ -. '-3�....>"^�„r�.��'i �.:e+air-ar.'-rev...-.rsu�e�..s�:.».-.T1'-.�•+N'�.l ..i M1+ia ��s�l.�.� .. ...-. .
m NCIA t DMSiOn 430D Creek PAW RaletO, iC 27607-W 733-2665 No: Omw
i Qv".- MOM K. M. "m- ft WM Eansm 111rew
m
rorwrust ommmm
N
w Field InformaUan
N
N 3MPAP EMU*
N Hi SRIMI Grains
1646 Slr "Id Crossroads Rd
Four Oasts. HC 27524 Test
Famr HOGFARU
"nt Services Inc-
1 St Crop: Small Gram AT 80-100 0 %80 0 0 0 0 3
v
MIN 0.76 138
3.4
513
1.6 54 86 34
39.0
1Q0
54
42
91
91
32
24
0.0
Field lrdbrmatlov
ied
Reoommenclutiem
F
ar YEW
1RIB
AV
Mrs
w
A Berm HayAlmM
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80.100
0 0
0 0
0
SpFi
3
2nd Cm : Berm Ftayft.M
0
180.220
0 0
0 0
0
:S
12
Ix
Test Reswdts
W
SWI Claw M WV CEC
BSX
Ac pH P-1 -1
%
Ali
r 7 WA-1 2
X 1
Za-A!
CV4
P
zi
AK" M&-N
16
VI N 0.81 1.45
4,0
75.0
1 C 6.7 273 166
440
11.0
38
22 29
87
B7
85
233
033
=
Field #nforrrdNm
led to
Recommervda�tiorts
W
E
e
r
or
irm
a
n
8 Soybeans
1S Crop: Berm HaytM
1.21•
180-220
0 140-160
0 0
0
0
12
a
2ndM -
Test RM Its
E
M1 CAW WX WN CEC
Ac pH P-I K4
CaX
MP-
Alh-f
t)Afn-Al
9.1
n At
Q-7
S-1
SS•
M lliM
Ilia
WIN C 81 1.47
2 3
54.0
1.3 5.7 '135 35
350
13.0
31
28
49
49
31
24
0"1
M
Field Information
led Lim
RecommmWons
••Er
TIA
aWcrWime
IF
WS
N
C Fe A)Mim,m
1st Crop: Fell Wim,M
0
120-200
4M 0
0 $
0
pHs
12
to
7rd Cr
Test Results
SoftClaw
Ac pGHC Ftr K-1
A
AP
-1
(1 2
I
Cu-
4
1�
7C
R7 /►
_ ,
510
„�A�
-ffi
CJ
U
W
A

N
pv -p;
Wade C43W
I -AM
ids
1 -103
pourwIDA.
1 W: v
twine i;4wn Liq.
I 12r1a
K""
6930 D' x AtniLs RiceirAck Rd
Four Oaks, NIL Z7524
#I- naiysis R -'--,-ort
SteFwlFo
johosim c4mty
p
jr
Ga jfg--
s
mw
A 4
1164
122 34.9
32.7
4.w 039
m
Vil
Ad
m
A;a
Al
SE 12
6.33 6.98
vB
Copies ro AV*Tk-W Services Inc
Lo
A
Nimwnd, Doug
Lo
-AgrmwTd Ser4m Inc.
PO Ba 1096
Bealvilk, NC 28518
Ell
U,
9 aAk c
Lo
co
0-67
lif
r,
�
CD
ET
iU
CN DM% ALIM�L= CCA
A
1>
< C�

FAX {VE SHEET
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
NCDENR
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Raleigh Regional office
NORTH CARONTAN N TuR R RE![T Oi 1628 Mail Service Center
ENVIRONMENT .4lO NATUR.ti RESOLRCES
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
18 Pages including cover sheet
TO: 9 12a S SE— - -- FAX: q l (� 73 6 2IxfZ
23
FROM:jbo,4 4Q4TDATE: 9 >3
SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:
If you do not receive all pages, ca# 919.571.4700 or fax back to 919.571.4718.

RX DATE ITIME SEP. -22' 03 (MON) I 39 9040106 F. OOi
09i23/2003 10:42 934810E HAYES PAGE 01
R. M. Hayes
1646 Strickla.nd's Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks, NC 27524
FAX: [phone]
Cell: 919-369-6070
FAX
Date: q
To. _ �, !4un�
RE:
Total Number of Pages including cover sheet
Text;Jo_.__-- _

E1 DA'TEMNIE :SEP. -22' 03(MON) 13:39 9340106
0S/23/2003 11 9340106 HAYES
P. 001
PAGE 02
MicheO F. Easley. Govemor
4�OF W A 1�� Wlillam G. Ross Jr, Secretary
North Carolina 0epa•rtment of Environment and Natkiral Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
r Division of Wa!er QualiVi
'-f
September 10, 2003
Mr, R. M. Hayes
1646 Sticklands Crossroads Mill Road
Four Oaks, N.C. 27524
Subject; Request for farm records
Creekside farms
Facility 51-34
Permit No. NCA251034
Dear iMT. Hayes:
On August 28, 2003, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office contacted you to request copies of the
farm waste Irrigation application records and lagoon analysis for the period of July 14 through November
14, 1999. You should be aware that the animal waste permit AWS510034 in effect at that time includes
the following condition!
Any duty authorized officer, employee, or representative of the DWQ may, upon presentation of
credentials and in accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, enter and inspect
any property, premises or place on or related to the collection, treatment, storage and land application
system at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect
and obtain a copy of any records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; and
may obtain Samples of the animal waste, groundwater, soil, plant tissue, or surface water,
Please provide the requested records within texi (10) days of receipt of this request. Thank you for your cooperation.
If you should have any questions or desire further information please contact John Burnt at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely;
Ken Schuster, i
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
CC' Anita LeVeaux, Dept. of Justice
Jeremy Hill, Premium Standard Farms, Inc
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
V"
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Cenler phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699.1628 facsimile [phone] 1-800-623-7748

� // 3 y -il- 7 4. ,
11 44
Fow,i lim-2 tagoon 1mg-allon he-'cfs Record
.)()e Form Ioir F--af-.h I iel,,j (:fop GycIe
%'.If 3
,if %f
EX) *L, 11 i T F, .2
-0d Size (acres} = jAy F 7,2
;�affll Owner opef-alor
Owfief's Address i(,73P Ifflowl-D 4, ri operalars
/2w c- 7�9 -a q Address
Ownefs Phom-- :1 1-11jer-ator's Phone
From Waste U10iiiation Plan
clap Ivfm Reoo�mmrf%,Jind PAN Lo&c%-.g
111 011 13) 1411 Ilil ("1 IRI 141 1151 11
SLorl X.ne
End 71-e
Tcjtaj
kA.-fel
F IR
V06j—e
J� AN ACDhPd N; 13 Jhqrce
OVA&Ile Analy'Is PAN
1000 ga.]
lei
j",ff,
(W, Atrc
Cqaiia.,re)
iA)
.2 Ile
tb
Crop Cyck, I
r jo

�
��
'
P�wmx|*xZ ioq000h/�qo|muhck|sHCznni `R7
' ra°'
ko/ � nwh v`ef"j, pp/ Cx)p y(1p
ILAIJ �le Id sue�c.~,)
ra,mn°^o,
O~u,,'xAd*.x,` 1x'nv^nn()ocmw'` m ��
^u__
=r�p"o"c� � nw,mm,��»oo;� -----------' — -------------� CD
.- � __--
C!D__
F,mmvwao/e V|^|izaUmnp/an cn
Ciop T4PG--''' --------------' -----------RuVAN ILo"
i fool)
JAI
"^
--------------
='
_
==
�=
x|
{c�.^.^m*. m,
- ' ---'--- --- —

I 4
M I lei 1 j
i
LA
Jill
I
J n
I
f I
90 S9b'd S13AVH 90TOVES ZD :0Z
�00 '� 90 i 0�,.0 6� f (N000 rc c - dEs
E00Z IEZ'/5� '
61I 11 IV a 1�

iC ?A I j ii I1'vi �ie 1 4300 Reedy Creek Rcad Raleigh, IBC 27607-6465 (919�733-2655 � licpvct No: wO2b2I �
_
Grnuver.- Hayes, R. W C.opief To: CAmnty Cttension Director f
494-B Suicldznd (x inroads Rd. llgirnent Semites lnc- m
E
' four Oaks, NC 27524 USDA-NRCS nslm D �n
CCCC!So
,, f n y�-Agrmem Se"Wi sInc.171
Li� j�dysis e VI i• Farm- W. Ror 1096
Ije Ozville, NC 28518
14fL5.'Oit Johnsta-M County
Lxboratori Rrsuft imiz lliw. unless
SseripfcJ� N p r ca Mg S FT ,t% in Cu B mo C1 C ,
TaJa! 491 M 52,9 �t8 121 32.3 22.9 3-42 U.420.78 0.42 LA � D o
IN'-N m _i M M M M m m M R p
m o
ALS
-NO3 'Iva A Al Se 1J � � _ C'li� ii� ,�� 1�Lf.� CP v
ilfr:c�fphar OR-h 47; 781
[jq Urea
-• - _ _ - -
tttrre ss Ayicaw for r iifr--
? -
-ray racy.
ff: �y _tl sl]T�aod �:a 1r
f}4- S •:t t.T "�.A"s Pb^�L
.�/(��_-
tL �L„
jA •' - _ lUf 4R Y -� ICJ -
)��
2. E Y� `' a9-^ {i - -� S7 - o f L'.V_i
�s :.�ri „
_;H _
9Y%
h'�'N -1 ''3i _
j.
.L'• ..
a ?Y.`3
b
G)
m
v
CD

r
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the hack of the ma ipi
or on the front If space permits. ?!c
1. Article Addressed to:
5 '7, SEQ
MR R M HAYES
1646 STRICKLANDS CROSSROADS
A.
^� /l IL _ . ❑ Agent
8. Refved by {[(Prlvted Nam4J C. D e of Delivery
1 t Y
I 1A W
D. Is,d" addres's different from Item 1 Y
if enter delivery address below: ❑ No
FOUR OAKS NC 27524 3. Service type
Request for farm records.Johnston Co.9/10/03 JH ❑ Certlfled Mall ❑ Express Mall
NCA251034 Creekside Farms Facility 51-34 ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
1 ❑ Insured Mall ❑ C,O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 70113 0500 0000 4294 5346 1
(Transfer from service labeo I
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102e95NO2-W-1-03F

QM.. ILL }SAV stLE ;_ki[
fFIL RAif ail'1„f]IP, �3��!�ZiV }- 9k
[?t (}(j
it �: fF V.�� fY-
.-��ubclY
. ,i n�Yf
GTower: Mayes, R. M.
Copjes 7b:
Agrimcni Services Inc.
Ln yj
494-B Strickland Crossroads did
NicTUDad, Foie
L
Four Oafs, NC 27524
_
ry a
mom:,
.
CIO
LU
i'
astle
naiysis effort 'Pa
f� U�
�? [s 7
A 'Y7
9/18/03
DATE 74G4 CP
(�trac-rr DATE, tojzz)`f9 Johnston County
'-
_ _;► +F" T i -_*� §: it i;� r �� ..�:
T--r--
�O
�¢jilelD:
N
P X ca MKI s Fe mn Zn Cu
B
Ma _^CT C
`,
1
Total 491
_
52.9 818 121 32.3 22.9 3.42 0.42 0-78 OA2
1."
- �
`p
IN -N
w
ste Code:
-NH4
ry
m o
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS
C:N
DM% CCP%-
fit v�
scri�itiax
ORGY
475 7.81
ne Woon U(t.
Urea
z fflAWR aUOUS: �iutrte s �Q�f� - W F ✓�N`'"�
li4�Ttiatt fr id W. #r3fi JF U% i" , 1 r� „mot ,� � is � Gy �4}' -s ¢ l f�q Ws fib -Al Se Li
rigaflon 2.1 (w1 b 6- Q_71 �r 9 L T f! IJ `w? ,i1 111 ;Tt it �i q

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
November 9, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.M. Hayes
494 Strickland Crossroads Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina 27524
Subject: Notice of Violation
R.M. Hayes Farm
Facility #51-34
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Hayes:
1
On, October 12, 2000, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office responded to a complaint of over
application of hog wastes to a field (tract 1188, number
1 in waste plan) adjacent to Strickland Crossroads Road
along the path to the entrance of this farm. Upon
investigation of the complaint it was determined that
indeed excessive wastes had been applied which was evident
by the ponding and runoff of the wastes across the road
into the property. Although there was no evidence to
indicate that the wastes flowed to reach "waters of the
state it was evidently in excess of the hydraulic rates
suited for this field. The ponding and overapplication of
waste are violations of the conditions for waste
application as specified in the waste utilization plan.
Additionally, the general animal waste permit specifies
that the Division of Water Quality must be notified of any
discharges of wastes or failures of the waste management
system. No notification was received as a result of this
event.
MAILING AODAFSSs 1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699.1628
LOCATION: 3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% NECYCLIEW10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. R.M. Hayes
Page Two
Please respond to this notification within 10(ten)days of
receipt. You should include in your response the actions that you
will take or have taken to address this violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
investigation please call at [phone].
Sincerely
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Doug Neimond, TDM, Inc.
Mr. Ken York, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

MEMO
DATE: s i 1+/c,.
TO: —T W SUBJECT:
Zka N-e sn k 1 a v. 6%, -rt ws
�•.�GLw.t,,..�'� 4t,v..� `�-lz.�-c,s `�-��.�E- tNc �]-a-�.,ir t.�yZ�R.- f�4�v
ly-
11.E
la! Y L f IZ i2 i f�hTi D FdQ-D R-P4-
le-
NGO rL4'35 Wu I 4 O T
FROM:
A��
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
NCDENR ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
PRINTLD ON RKCYCL[b PAPER

MEMODATE• % 1 31
To: �,•1 FS9-c)E-„►,,eAr SUBJECT:_ NM 1 O,L
V
Cam..;{ JiwvT h
k" Lo�ka.4 r:� � .p44
CA
Z4 -D49y
f °rl�b8�'33o1FROM•
AID
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
NCDENR ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
PRINTED ON RRCYCLED PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 15, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R.M. Hayes
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
494 Stricklands Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
IT098;WAA
0 0
� 461 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
MAY 1 9 no
Subject: Status Update Wettable Acre
Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 51-34
Johnston County
Dear R.M. Hayes:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is hereby requesting a status update concerning the
completion of a Wettable Acre Determination for your subject facility. A letter dated August 27,
1999 was sent to advise you that your facility was required to complete a Wettable Acre
Determination within six months (see attached letter). As of May 10, 2000 DWQ has not
received the facilities Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form. Please submit to DWQ
within 10 days a written explanation as to why a Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form
has not been submitted. Please include the necessary information detailing the steps taken to
certify this facility for Wettable Acres.
Please be aware that not submitting this certification within the allotted six months may
result in civil penalty assessments, permit revocation, and/or injunctive relief.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County
Ordinance, or permitting requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

R.M. HAYES
K" - -
494 B STRICKLAND CROSSROADS RD.
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
�
e
[phone]
4/10/00
00
Charles Alvarez
U
QI
�o1Mr.
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
1
Dear Mr. Hunt,
This memo is to address the complaint inspection that occurred on 2/22I00 and resulted in a Notice of
Violation for my farm (FN 51-34).
As a result, of the hurricanes, snow storms, and recent DWQ freeboard policy I made arrangements to
apply waste around the first week in February 2000. 1 disked the area in which the infraction occurred in
an effort to improve the Fescue vegetation on this area and the prevention of runoff due to the wet
conditions. I disked beyond the wettable area of the gun so all land area in and around the spray pattern
would be broken. I wanted to apply this area before I planted the fescue to give it a jump start. Needless
to say these pre -application activities did not prevent me from receiving the NOV.
To prevent this from happening again, I must take steps to prevent surface water drainage from adjacent
wood lands from entering my sprayfield. I propose to do this by diverting the surface water by digging a
ditch into the non -wetland areas adjacent this sprayfield and diverting this water off -site. 1 have consulted
with a Technical Specialist about this activity and plan to start as soon as possible. The ditch would not be
dug into the sprayfield but rather adjacent to it. I would like to make as many ditches as possible into
waterways, for the sake of not having ditches near the sprayfield.
Being a swine producer that has endured several unpredictable weather patterns, I have taken the necessary
steps to maintain the integrity of my waste structure. In addition, I have had to deal with a neighbor that
does not comprehend the importance of managing a waste stream under these unusual circumstances.
With Kind Regards,
R.M. Hayes
Owner
Cc Doug Niemond
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.

FORM
1!
1 Field Size
44 r li [ I Own
4-3
H
�- Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle PULL BESIDE ENTRANCE ROAD
Tr #
(acres 't1141 (A)
=aimS`
Owner
er� it�ress
`rre #~
Facility Number 51-34
Irrigation Operator SAME
Irrigation Operators SAME
Address SAME
Operators Phone# SAME
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type FESCUE HAY Recommended PAN FH
Loading (Iblacre) = (B)200
(2) (3) (4) (5) 161 (7) (8) f9) (10) 0 1)
1188 Field/H d # PULL 1
2.5
RM HAYES
6930 DEVILS RACE TRAC RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
919-934-0106
PAN Applied t. ge
(lb/acre) Balance
•.. -
Hours
Remaining
Inches
Per/Acre
Remaining
slim
of
Volume
per Acre
Totals 1 145800 58320.00 169.13
Owners Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification Number
' NCDA Waste Anaylsis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
" Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record PULL 1 LEASED FIELD BY HIGHWAY
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Field Size (acres) _ (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Facility Number 51-34
Irrigation Operator SAME
Irrigation Operators SAME
Address SAME
Operators Phone # SAME
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type C/WAISB Recommended PAN WA
Loading (lb/acre) _ (B) 100
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1101 111)
457 FieldlHyd # PULL 1
3.29
RM HAYES
6930 DEVILS RACE TRAC RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
919-934.0106
NitrogenVolume PAN Applied
(lb/acre) Balance—--maining
Per/Acre
s.per
Acre
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Totals 1 48600 1 14772.04 1
Operator's Signature
Operators Certification Number
1 31.02 1
" NCDA Waste Anaylsis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
"Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

13
FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
457 Field'H d # PULL 3
3,29
RM HAYES
6930 DEVILS RACE TRAC RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
919-934-0106
PULL 3 LEASED FIELD BY HIGHWAY
Facility Number 51-34
Irrigation Operator SAME
Irrigation Operator's SAME
Address SAME
Operators Phone # SAME
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type CJWAISB Recommended PAN WA
Loading (lb/acre) _ (B) 100
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (a) (9) (101 (111
...
PAN*
• 1//•.
PAN Applied NitrGgerr—
Oblacre) Balance—
(8) x (9) (lb/acre)
/1/ 7 /
Hours
Remaining
on Field
Inches
Per/Acre
Remaining
oi
Total
Min.
9 Of
Sprink.
••-
BE
I Volume
per Acre
(gal/acre)
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Totals 1 48600 14772.04
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification Number
1 31,02
' NCOA Waste Anaylsis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record PULL 2 LEASED FIELD BY HIGHWAY
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Facility Number 51-34
Irrigation Operator SAME
Irrigation Operators SAME
Address SAME
Operators Phone # SAME
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type r!��7
Recommended PAN WA
Loading oblacre) = (B) 100
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (81 (9) (10) (11)
457 1 FieldlHyd # PULL 2
2.87
RM HAYES
6930 DEVILS RACE TRAC RO
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
919-934-0106
rrr .
PAN Applied N oge
Oblacre) Balance
r r
Hours
Remaining
Inches
PerlAcre
- emaining
oTotal
il
# of
is
Volume
per Acre
Totals 1 48600 16933.80 35.56
Owners Signature Operators Signature
• Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification Number
NCDA Waste Anaylsis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RAI-aiGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 15, 2000
MIL"Ousaug
Mr. R.M. Hayes
Hayes Farm TDM #9
494B Stricklands CrossRoads Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina 27509
Subject: Notice of Violation
Intent To Enforce
Hayes Farm TDM #9
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Hayes:
On February 22, 2000, Charles Alvarez of the Raleigh Regional Office
responded to a complaint concerning runoff from spray irrigation at the above
named facility. An inspection was made and discolored water was noted
discharging from a field that had recently had animal waste applied. The runoff
from the field flowed into a drainage pipe and proceeded into a farm pond
downstream. Three nutrient samples were taken to determine whether animal waste
had discharged from the spray field. The samples were taken to the Division of
Water Quality Lab on Reedy Creek Road in Raleigh.
On March 1, 2000, sample results were returned from the Division of Water
Quality's Chemistry Lab in Raleigh. The sample reports show high levels of
ammonia and Kjcldahl Nitrogen coming off the spray field indicative of animal
waste. Runoff samples from the field show ammonia and Kjeldahl Nitrogen levels
at 360 mg/1(milligrams) and 400 mg/1 respectively. Normal background levels for
ammonia are less than 2.0 mg/l.
The farm pond and stream are an unnamed tributary to Hannah Creek and are
classified as C NSW waters within the Neuse River Basin.
1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-1628
PHONE [phone]L FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCL110/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. R.M. Hayes
March 15, 2000
Page Two
The above referenced discharge is a violation of Animal Waste General Permit
AWS510034 which requires no discharges to waters of the State, and making an outlet to waters
of the State without first applying for and receiving the required Permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(a).
Please note that violations of NCGS 143-215.1 are subject to civil penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day, per violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action against you for
the above referenced violation. If you have justification that this violation was caused by
situations or circumstances beyond your control, you should include them with your response.
You should respond to this Notice in writing within twenty days of your receipt. In the absence
of any justification, the Raleigh Regional Office will recommend to the Director that an
enforcement action be taken against your facility.
Please write in detail about the actions taken by the facility to manage and prevent runoff during
spray application of waste. Your response should include a copy of the 1999-2000 land
application records for the application of waste and any other pertinent information regarding the
violation referenced above. Your response will be reviewed and forwarded to the Director for his
consideration.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at (919) 571-
4700.
Sincerely
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

Send To: DWQ Environmental Sciences Branch Attn. Mark Hale or Karen Lynch
4401 Reedv Creek Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607 [phone] Fax: [phone] •
nvestigation Date/Time Mu fc it I , Joao _ 1(f 0o
nvestigatars: Nartte_c huric_s- Alva-Trz
)rganization be JQ ___ Regional office td L
teporting Party: Q— N �5Z GA+w l d Address 1E21QU Phone '�� 4 �-o z _
�oinvesd-ators: Address Phone
vianhours Required, y- D ._
Location: WaterbodyF'ArM �►��i _ __Station Subasin
-ounty_ 1. L. s,b,,/ _ Nearest City/7'own Landmark IV e , f ,v bra Je � 1-- '7 ^ .`i, s_
Cributaries Affected_ nfON e. nr a cl Cs e. h&.r� a 7rra^,
Latitude/ Longitude (Event center) _Attach map describing area of event and provide coordinates
Complete for Fish Kills and Disease Events:
Date Began (First reported) L' z oo Time 000
At time of investigation: kill or disease event is in progress[ ] completed [-wK
:xtent of Kill or Disease: Riveryliles Lake/Estuary (Estimate area) spa cv-c 5_
:vent Duration: Estimated length in Days Hours
Total Mortality:
estimated Total Finfish Killed: ISO Other Organisms Killed (Observable)
Finfsh Species Affected (attach additional sheet if necessary): l
Species: c,+ -Fsh Size Range 3 z�6r5, Approx No/Area observed �' 6 f1W YQ'-
En Distress / Dying [v]' Dead [ ] Decayed [,� Percent observed with sores or lesions *uonr—
Species: brown. Size Range, Approx No/Area observed .ti/"6/ 42c,
In Distress / Dying ( Dead [ ] Decayed [ Percent observed with sores or lesions A M r
Species:
In Distress / Dyin; [
Dead [ J
Size Range Approx No/Area observed
Decayed [ ] Percent observed with sores or lesions
Species: Size Range Approx No/Area observed
In Distress I Dying [ ] Dead (] Decayed.` ] Percent observed with sores or lesions
Other organisms affected (crustaceans, mollusks, insects, terrestrial animals, etc.): e!
Fish Disease Observations (Check all that apply):
LesionsrSores ( ] Injuries [ ] Flared Gills [ ] Excessive mucus [ J 'tumors [ j Visible Parasites ( ]
Gasping [ J Loss of equilibrium [ ] Erratic behavior [ ] Attempts to leave water [ 4] Lethargy ( ] Convulsions [ ]
Other[ ] Describe
General Lesion/Sore Information: Size (cm):
.appearance/Comments:
Location (mark on diagram):
Page i of 2 5/98 (continue on back)

Physical Observations:
Station: Station
Time:
Cloud Cove: _- ,, +I,t C')a,4J 14 Seas Air Temp a°F Precipitation _ /Va-e
Wind Direction -TO Wind Speed 5-1 a .hg Secchi Depth
Bottom Depth : meters 1 `
Prior Weather Conditions (3-4 Days) SRaweP o.ld Z - w-a m wee { P,r c! eur
Outfalls present? Y [ ] N[4 Describe
Spills in area? (Describe)
Other Activity (Specify) 12 55* b1e. over 061 ii_rl /6L4
Depth
(teeters)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(m )
%
Saturation
pH
Temperature
(oC)
Conductivity
(meter
readin )
Salinity
(ppt)
Surface
l0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.'0
Algal Bloom Description: If bloom occurs without fish disease or a fish kill, fill out Algal Bloom -Report form only
Visual sins
[ ] Discolored water Describe
[ ] Flecks, balls, filaments Describe
[ ] Surface film Describe
[ ] Other Describe
i aste/odor complaints
Biological and Chemical Sampling Please indicate sampling locations on attached map (s).
Fish (Describe) CIA. S k bre r" Iced,Preserved? s
Station: Sample No
Contact for results C' 6a r 1 eL __A_1 va re z. _
Phone ^ lr
Algae/Plants (Describe) jLmea
Station: s � Po Sample No
Contact for results C hp I e
oIt .__ C" It (_ 4 Snn
Other (Describe)
Station:
Contact for results
Phone
Chemical Samples (metals, pesticides, nutrients etc.
Sample No
Station: Sample No
Contact for results
Phone
Photographs and/or Videos taken? Y [�v [ ]
Where on file? Name C ht 11,s 8l rg re't-- Phone 7-1'f
)4e K
Additional Comments, Observations, Conclusions: (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Page 2 of 5193

PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW
NCDENft
NORTH CAA0UNA:-QePARTMENT or'
EKwRcmmexr Avn NAruRALRE3WRCrs
NEW MAUNG ADDRESS:
RALEIom REGIONAL.
OFFICE
DEPARTNI04T OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
1 628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699- 1 628
PHYSICAL LOCATION (NOT A
MAILING ADDRESS)
3500 BARRETT DRIVE, RM 1.01
RALEIGH, NC 27609
VoIcE: 9 19/57 1-4700
FAX: [phone] l 8
A
x
MAILING ADDRESS
TO: -T IJ J f-d' bDV`q n FAX: 7 3—
FROM: Ch- r l Pu _ / 1 ( Ve re
SUBJECTL 'Y,,V pS > d✓�h �is� k:� DATE a
M-ESSAQ E:
L 11 1,-e
� 1 � Icr Sco/v, ` -700

. \ �— ten. in -
. \ /— ­'. t _
Fend To: DWQ Environmental Sciences Branch Attn. Mark Hale or Karen Lynch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607_(919) 733 9960 Fax: [phone]
ILCtll Investi�atiion No. (ESB use only)
nvestigation DateJTime_
l�afc_h 1,�2�_
_� oo
.nvestigato rs: Name_
), ..Its _ 6
v a r ca=
_
)rganization
Q
_ Regional office_ JQtZA
address n o
,,cT� r
n, c 4 Phone .. 5'
-� � 00
Zeporting Party: do N J N
6111),1
_Address _ J�21QU _ _
Phone_5 J ~ 4
-oinvesdgators:
Address
Phone
vlanhours Required 'i. V
Location: Waterbody
r
Farts A,
Station
Subasin
:ounty
Nearest City/Town.Landmark N rLv-.&ry 6r4-fe
'l-- -7
Tributaries Affected
Ahl . a N_�
d ► i c jlµ+
Latitude/ Longitude (Event center)
- ____Attach map describing area
of event and provide coordinates
Complete for Fish Kills and Disease Events:
Date Began (First reported) LJ Z L %oo Time 13 00
A.t time of investigation: kill or disease event is in progress [ ] completed [vj"
-xtent of Kill or Disease: River Miles Lake/Estuary (Estimate area) _ 1.1,n [rr 5_ _
Event Duration: Estimated length in Days Hours
Total Mortality:
.stimated Total Finfish Killed: Other Organisms Killed (Observable)
Finfish Species Affected (attach additional sheet if necessary):
Species: cK+ t'rh Size Range „! -66 _ _ Approx No/Area observed O'36 fl-14 4(.Qc
In Distress / Dying Cu?' Dead [ ] Decayed (4 Percent observed with sores or lesions V c nr, e—
Species: b-re-l" 2 Size Range _3 ,.,,.ke3; Approx No/Area observed 'L°/oo/eo.J q0C,
In Distress / Dying [vf Dead [ ] Decayed K Percent observed with sores or lesions _rva a
Species:_ Size Range Approx No/Area observed
In Distress / Dying [ j Dead [ j Decayed [ j Percent observed with sores or lesions
Species:
[n Distress / Dying [
Dead [ ]
'Size Range Approx No/Area observed
Decayed( j Percent observed with sores or lesions
Other organisms affected (crustaceans, mollusks, insects, terrestrial animals, etc.): e-
Fish Disease Observations (Check all that apply)
Lesions/Sores [ ] Injuries [ ] Flared Gills [ ] Excessive mucus [ ] Tumors [ ] Visible Parasites [ ]
Gasping [ ] Loss of equilibrium [ ] Erratic behavior [ ] Attempts to leave water Lethargy [ ] Convulsions [ ]
Other[ ] Describe
General Lesion/Sore Information: Size (cm):
Appearance/Comments:
Location (mark on diagram):
C O�
ZA . l
D i
Page t of 2 5/98 (continue on back)

Algal Bloom Report Status
Collector Alvarez
Location
Waterbody
I Hayes Farm Pond
Date
03/01/00
County
IJOHNSTON
River basin
INEU
Sub basin
10
Station #
IHayes
Algal Biovolume1 -4036583 mm3/m3
Algal Density
-7219984 units/ml
Surface pH
�- S.U.
Surface Dissolved Oxyge
% Saturat.
Observed Fish Kill?
Chlorophyll -a
Not Sampled uSA
Total Nitrogen
mg/l
Total Phosphorus
mgn
Charles Alvarez of RRO took a sample after a citizen complaint (fish kill). Property is adjacent to
land sewage application site. grab sample was bright green.
pond off U S highway 701
near princeton.
Sample was so dense (10800 chlorella cells in one grid) there was not enough room for the totals in
the calculation box
Dominant Algal Species
Species Class Biovoi % Biovol Density % Density
Chlamydomonas species CHL-4,037,545 100.0-7,222,801 100.0
Family Statistics
Family Number Biovolume % Biovolume Density % Density
Algal Bloom? W Yes F- No F- NIA F- Undetermined

Division of Environmental.Management
!, FEB 2 5 M
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD DEJHP'R RALEIGH REGIC�lk Off fC1
For Investigation of a r
Samples collected and DKI
forms completed
by: Ch it Z
b Only
Lab'No.
Station.
No.
Station Location
Date
Time
No. of.
Battles
01
♦41 p
UJ0
Z
it
"-
it
14 fs
Relinquished by( ignature):
14ce b (S gna e):
Da e / Time
ZQ
el
Rae
by
el
Rec
by
Rai
Rae
by (Lab)
Method of Shipment: 3
,SecuritL
Type and Condition:
Seal b
Lock b
Broken b
en by:
T A R 1TQV MCF- l
•�Date
Relincuished by
Time
i•
A Me
�-
II,
r

-" NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
❑IvISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 15, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.M. Hayes
Hayes Farm TDM ##9
494B Stricklands CrossRoads Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina 27509
Subject: Notice of Violation
Intent To Enforce
Hayes Farm TDM #9
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Hayes:
On February 22, 2000, Charles Alvarez of the Raleigh Regional Office
responded to a complaint concerning runoff from spray irrigation at the above
named facility. An inspection was made and discolored water was noted
discharging from a field that had recently had animal waste applied. The runoff
from the field flowed into a drainage pipe and proceeded into a farm pond
downstream. Three nutrient samples were taken to determine whether animal waste
had discharged from the spray field. The samples were taken to the Division of
Water Quality Lab on Reedy Creek Road in Raleigh.
On March 1, 2000, sample results were returned from the Division of Water
Quality's Chemistry Lab in Raleigh. The sample reports show high levels of
ammonia and Kjeldahl Nitrogen coming off the spray field indicative of animal
waste. Runoff samples from the field show ammonia and Kjeldahl Nitrogen levels
at 360 mg/l (milligrams) and 400 mg/l respectively. Normal background levels for
ammonia are less than 2.0 mg/I.
The farm pond and stream are an unnamed tributary to Hannah Creek and are
classified as C NSW waters within the Neuse River Basin.
e-n
r
1626 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINANA 27®
PHONE 91 9-$71 -4700 FAX [phone] B
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. R.M. Hayes
March 15, 2000
Page Two
The above referenced discharge is a violation of Animal Waste General Permit
AWS510034 which requires no discharges to waters of the State, and making an outlet to waters
of the State without first applying for and receiving the required Permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(a).
Please note that violations ofNCGS 143-215.1 are subject to civil penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day, per violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action against you for
the above referenced violation. If you have justification that this violation was caused by
situations or circumstances beyond your control, you should include them with your response.
You should respond to this Notice in writing within twenty days of your receipt. In the absence
of any justification, the Raleigh Regional Office will recommend to the Director that an
enforcement action be taken against your facility.
Please write in detail about the actions taken by the facility to manage and prevent runoff during
spray application of waste. Your response should include a copy of the 1999-2000 land
application records for the application of waste and any other pertinent information regarding the
violation referenced above. Your response will be reviewed and forwarded to the Director for his
consideration.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at (919) 571-
4700.
Sincerely
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

C1J! �»f -,"oU0 14: Z � J; , . -1'j0
MAR;; 21' 00(TUE) 17:23 NGUENR RRO
LIZ
P, 001/01)4
WON" cowsmrwm %0
c"Ammomw&" Ruww"m
NEW MAILING ADDRESS:
R�LCI�H R�GIQKAC
OF�lGE
DePw�+w�� o►
Ewreaorcwr AND
NATUPAL R6isoWMCLa
11520 MAM SCWCE CrNTER
RAA.Vow, NC 274909-1 628
"Mwc,#.L LOCATOW ("a
wruwo Apwgs e)
atboo Bmetr"r DRIV[. R04 1-01
RALwo +, NC 27,509
%4mcc: 01 W57 1-4700
Fix: 9101571.471d
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW
MAILING ADDRESS ! !
TO: lAd I I h9r Ai iw Four: — V ?
mom:
suaiccr: � �... oo►�
5...,PLO Aar. I
fs
MEseAGE:
w
a

Send To: DWQ Environmental Sciences Branch Attn. ?Mark Hale or Karen Lynch
4101 Reedv Creek Rd. Raleigh ..NC 27607 [phone] Fax: [phone]
-,yestigation Date/Time Mo rr I,. 2000 1�ca—
estigators: Varne C iv r l e 5 —Alva r e 2_ _
)r;anization. Q — Regional office 12Q.d
►IC
Zeporcing Parry: �N C, , d . Address l21Qt) _ _ Phone_ 5'�1-4_ a
:oinvestigators:, Address Phone
,[anhours Required 'f. V r
�ocatioa: Naterbody Farts ��d Station Subasin
�;�nry, Nearest City/Iown.Landmar N e r+ Gre,Je '-- T �..'ie s
tributaries Affected NoN a0 rl ►`s Are1r.
aritude/ Longitude (Event center), _ _ Attach map describing area of event and provide coordinates
Curnplete for Fish Kills and Disease Events:
)ate Began (First reported) Zj Z L/00 . Time 1300
Oi time of invesoi;ation: [till or disease event is in progress ( ] completed (vi�
:s:eat of Kill or Disease: RiverMiles— Lake/Estuary (Estimate area) 4.44 c,rr 5 _
:venc Duration: Estimated length in Days Hours
total mortality:
stimated Total F"infish Killed: _ 1 Sa Other Organisms Killed (Observable) �`—
"infsh Species Affected (atrach additional sheet if necessary):
;oecies: C-+ f.'S 1 Size Range -3 es Approx No/Area observed
.)istress 1 Dying (vr Dead (] Decayed (4 Percent observed with sores or lesions u a Are— _.
icecies: brc,M Size Range 3 ' fApprox No/Area observed 'L'/ae 4Qc.
'n Distress 1 Dying [ Dead[ ] Decayed [ Percent observed with sores or lesions No N'r
species:
.n Distress 1 Dying [
Dead[ ]
Size Range
Decayed( ]
Approx No/Area observed
Percent observed with sores or lesions
oecies: Site Range Approx No/Area observed
n Distress / Dying [ ] Dead [ ] Decayed [ ] Percent observed with sores or lesions
?ther organisms affected (crustaceans, mollusks, insects, terrestrial animals, etc.): 62ON e--
Fish Disease Observations (Check all that apply):
�csions/Sores [ ] Injuries [ ] Flared Gills [ ] Excessive mucus [ ] Tumors [ ] Visible Parasites [ ]
asping ( ] Loss of equilibrium [ ] Erratic behavior [ ] Attempts to leave water V] Lethargy [ ] Convulsions ]
Dtner( ] Describe_
General Lesion/Sore Information: Size (cm):
.ppearance/Comments:
:cation (mask on diagram):
i,e t oil 998 (continue on back)

COON JOHNSTON
RIVIEF BASIN
R.E?O1 TTO RRC Reocna101ficr
Other
COLLI CTOR(S) ALVAREZ
Ertimalyd BOD Range
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chembtry I+boratary Report / water Q.idity .
Q SAMPLETYk'.
PHIQHIIY
Q AMBIENT QA 0 STREAM EFFLUENT
El i
COMPLIANCE 0 CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT
EMERGENCY 0 ESTUARY
5tatien 1 owidn: HAYES FARM UP
Lab Number :
YW 1054
Date Received:
2/23/20M
Tine Received:
17_00 PM
Received By
DS
Data Released
AR
Date Reported:
3/ 1 /2000
d_ Ctilarinated: Remar4s:
�witro Date "it (yylmtn/dd) � Date Cod (yyimaJdd) Tlme Baia 77tae Ewd I Depth - DK Da, DBM Vdue Type -A, H, L Cem"Afe-T, S, B I Sample Type
20000227 1410 0.1
310 L
H' 340
Low 335 m /L
LD
orm: MF Fecal 3161a /100nd
or= MF Total 113W /100m1
orm: atbe Fuel 31615 /imad
lifoem: Feed Sow 31673 /100m1
Towsw w41L
Volatile 505 L
Fixed 510 Mki
eOdue: Sugxodcd 530 m L
Volaaft 53S aqvL
Fiend S40 wafL
II 403 unln
xidity to pil41436 m 1.
tdftto H 3.3 435 L
limrsay w PH s.3 us mgfL
FkanaltytoPH41410 L
f0cm MVL
lirorm
16 NTU
Toul Tube '/100 mis
Chloride 940 mSIL
Chi a Tri 32217 u L
Chi a: Carr 32209 u
Mm"a 32213 u L
Color Tnsc 90 c.u.
Color H 33 PH. c.u.
Color pH 7.6 32 Cu.
720
Fkrorsdc 951
F 7111111) SVL
Graw acid Oils SSb nWL
Hardrm TOW 900 L
Cotsd 95 umhos/em2
M KAS 33260 L
Phemb 327" us/L
SulGtt N15 awL
SuIfWe 745 wgfl.
Boron
annm 42 Lisedu
Haavale»t Chromium u
X
NHS at N 610
22
L
X
TKN an N 625
13
mVL
X
NO2 phts NO3 as N 630
0.12
L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.74
mg1L
POI as P 70507
meL
P: Diaalred as P 666
VWL
K-Po a luzo
OWL
Cd. Cadmium IM7
O /L
Cr C1>omisem TOta1 1034
u L
C11- Copper' 1042
u&L
Ni-fdtdod 1067
O 1
M Lead 1051
n L
Zo. zinc I092
V-Vaeasurn
L
A& Silty 1077
u /L
Al-Ahrmlrsum 1103
tuVL
Be m 1012
uVL
Ca- Cakkfm 916
aWL
Co-Ofth 1037
uVL
Fe -Iran t04s
uVL
Ns- Sodium 929 L
AnEdICTttulIOM tea/L
47�do_ 4:� �u Cat L-t�-4
:mac. f ,f� , y.) � ,. �,�-�-� � �. � w'•.�-L- (.� ,nG L ):r= ..:�` /` i � -
book

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
-
.
Chemistry Lahsrafsry Report f Water QaaOq
Lib Number
YW 1055
Q
Dam Reedved:
2/23/2000
COUP
Rlvc
BASifI ;
JOHNSTON
EB1011ITY
XO AMBIENT 0 QA
STREAM
0 EFFLUENT
T1me Received:
Received By
12:00 PM
DS
4
REPO
T TO :
RRU Regional Office
COMPLIANCE Q CHAIN OF CUSTODY
0 LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
:
-
❑ EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released :
AR
COLL
CTOR(S)
ALVAREZ
Dam Reported:
3/1/2000
L-fi-q
rd BOD Ranac
Stafian L xdaa- HAYES FARM FIELD
Chlarinetcd:
Remarks.
Slatlaa
Date Bella (yy/mmmd)
Date Fad (yy/mm/dd)
1
Time Betio Time Ead
Depth - DM, DD, DBM
Value Type - A,11. L
Casapadte-7 S, B
SampleType
20000222
0_!
liform: MF Feral 31616
/100tn1
farm: MFTouI SISM
/100m1
ifurm: tube F.A 31615
/tWad
FCC 31673
/Iowd
Tani S00
L
Yalaltle S0S
ma/L
Fixed 540
403
diry_m pH 4-5 436
dity to 1PH 1-3 435
IfIx"a m L
' 75 Mf'U
1doU
oam T.W Tube '/I00 mh
Chloride 940 mVL
Od a: Td 32217 yIVL
Chl a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheophydrsa12213 u L
Colo True 50 c u.
Color H 13 H= cu
Color PH 7.6 E2 C.U.
720
Flttoide 931 L
F 719W /L,
Grew and OHs 556
Huchim TOM 900
Specific C-ML 95 umhae/tml
MHAS 31260
Pheaoh 32730 u L
Sulfate 945
Sultldt: 745
Boma
TannlR R L i
HouraleatChmmium a L
X
NH3 a N 610
360
L
X
TKN an N 625-
400
MyL
X
NO2 phas NO3 as N 630
t0.01
L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.01
m L
PO4 as P 705D7
L
P. Dlssolred as P 666
L
K-Pnusshtm
L
Cd• Cadmium I021
04MIU Tow 1034
L
Cu- CopVa 10@
L
N6Nkbd 1067
L
Pb- Lead 1051
twL
Yil.22oe1092
V-Vana&um
Silver 1077
u L
Al- Alum4mam 1103
Be.m 1011
uWL
Ca- Cddu o 916
uqll.
Co- Cobalt 1037
u L
Fc- h=1045
L
L i-Llrleium 1132 u L
Ma m 927 m /L
MtrMan nose 1055 u /L
Ha• Sodium 929 /L
AncakToud.1002 /L
Se. Sdadtsm 1147 /L
H 71900 uVL
L
Yestidda
Ptoiddta
Add Habiclda
E0=U
TPH Died Raw
OA battle
/Bi Crttso0nc Ra
RTPH
nktatt

01 b"
Stotien
•
I
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
jj�n�
ou 9 —
hl
! ' Chemr7 tAbmtory Regan I Water Qua0ty
I.
W
� TY1PP
JOHNSTON
II
F1i1Q8lTY
kSIN :
y i
DIENT Q QA
STREAM
�. EFFLUENT
IMPLIANCE
TO RRQ Regional plticc
_JI
%� CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
fOR{51 ALVAREZ
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
ROD Rangr<
Stalim Location: HAYES FARM DOWNSTREAM
Chlarinaled:
Rtmarha:
Dale Regis (yy/maaldd)
Dale End (TThnttddd)
1
Time Begin
1
Time Fad
Depth - DM, Do, DIM
Valaa Type - A,11, L
20=222 '
1430
D.1
D 314 2WL
D Hi& 340 mi
D Low 335 ujill. '
'form: MF Fecal31616 /IOmml
MF Total 31504 /f Wml
tube Fen[ 31615 /1i7w
orrtt: femISUT 31673 / 100m1
R TOW 500 MKL
VDI&dk SOS miVL
Fused SIO L
5 $10 rWL
VaHdk 53S MIVL
Fined 540 PWL
Ai 403 anal
topH CS 436 /L
m H &3 43S /L
Abgwty m H 0.146 ml-
k&UnW to pH 4,5 410 L
6E0 L
T ibidl 76 NTU
C iifo m Toul Tube '/100 m1r
Chloride 940 L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u L
Chi a: Con 32209 WIL
Pheqphydm a 32213 u
Color: True !0 c.u.
CWm H 3 63 • HQ C.U.
Color H 7.6 62 elt.
snide 720
Fk%Odk 951
Fon=Mehy& 7ISW
-
Grease sad Oils 356 WL
Hardmu Total900Eli
Cmtd. 95 umiwi/cm2
MBAs 3d260 OWL
Phenols 32730 U91L
Sul[= 945 asyL
Sulfide 745 TeL
Baron
Tannin a u L
Heaavakm Chromium WL
%
NH3 as N 610 1
ISO
m /L
%
T KN an N 62S
230
MCL,
%
NO2 pto NO3 a N 630
0.13
/L
X
P: Toni as P 665
7.0
SVL
PO4 a P 70507
L
P DLuotm d a P 666
PWL
►GPouaainsn
AWL
Cd-Cadmhtm 1027
Cr.C]aamiut470tal 1034
WL
Cl} cuffa 1042
ma
NWxbd 1067
Pb-Lead 1051
7n- 23ir 1m92
V-Vaaadmm
'}
u L
50-1077
/L
Al-Akndpum I105
u4vL
Be m I012
L
Ca- Calcium 916
Co- Cobalt 1037
/L
Fe. Itou [Do
u
Lab Number
YW I056
Dace ReaivW.
2/23/20D0
111mc Received:
12:00 PM
Received B7 :
Ds
Data RNeased : AR
Date Reported: 3 / 1 /2000
C*mpaaiierT, S.D. j mampts Type
Li -Lithium 1132 ultiL
427 m L
mil-mmentme 1055 n L
Ns- sodium929 m L
AmeuicToW 1D02 WL
Se-Sdcnkm 1147 ZWL
719I10 va
tajkftm WL
PuOddes
PC$dddo
Avid Hecbkkk$
BarUNeutrald!AAdd E:tractable Orunia
TPH glad Lum
A bottle
TPH Gamlirr
T7HfzmG"01uWRzW
Ph
D

mi
I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
R.M. Hayes
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
494 Stricklands Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear R.M. Hayes:
Iffl'?W'A
IT 0 0
A&4 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL, RESOURCES
December 30, 1999`
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 54'34::�
­Lohnston ,C6unfj+_2
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI,IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
/Z
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

AGRIMENT SERVICES INC. _
PO BOX 1096--_—�
BEULAYILLE, NC 28518
[phone] teUfax
1115199 ` �I
c^7
Mr. John Hunt f�
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Hunt,
This memo is to address the 99 annual inspection that was conducted for R.M. Hayes on 9/22/99
he had one facility (FN 51-34).
Farm 3I-383 had one deficiency:
1. One field designated for hay was being grazed. (NOD)
The designated pasture was super saturated from the rains and the animals were beginning to
do significant damage to the spray field. As a result, Mr. Hayes moved the animals to the
highest, driest, place to prevent excessive damage. Unfortunately, this area was designated
for hay thus the NOD was given. Mr. Hayes is aware of the importance of strict adherence to
the waste mgt. plan and the consequence of circumstance resulted in non-compliance. Mr.
Hayes has been obtaining additional lands to expand his application areas and hopefully allow
the flexibility of pasture onto the well -drained bay fields in the future.
I hope this information will address the Notice of Deficiency that was noted, If you have any
questions please feel free to call.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie G. Kenn Jr.
Technical Specialist
Agriment Services, Inc.
Cc R.M. Hayes
Doug Niemond TDM Farms

R.M. MAYES
494 B STRICKLAND CROSSROADS RD.
FOUR OAKS, N 27514
(919) 06,�� ,L,
10/28/99
Mr. John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Hunt,
r
A {
This memo is to address the complaint inspection that occurred on 9/22/99 and resulted in a Notice of
Violation for my farm (FN 51-34).
As a result of the 9113199-application event onto the coastal bermuda field closest to my neighbor, there
was a malfunction to my hard -hose traveler resulting in an irregular irrigation pattern. The turbo on my
reel became stuck which caused the psi. to increase beyond normal operating pressure. As a result of the
increased pressure, the wetted diameter on the gun increased beyond the bounds of the designated spray
area and encountered the motor home owned by my neighbor.
At first notice of the malfunction I tried to un-stick turbo and cut power to the pump. I readjusted the gun
angle well away from the neighbor's property and resumed pumping. I realized that no waters of the state
were impacted but some spray had encountered the motor home. I was concerned about the neighbor's
property so I offered to clean the outside of the motor home where the overspray impacted. The neighbor
was given $100 to get motor home washed and a receipt was given (enclosed). I hoped this would bring
an end to the problem; however, my neighbor has been persistent when calling this office for various
reasons. Being a swine producer that has endured 40 inches of rain from three hurricanes one of which
reached 500-year storm status; I have taken the necessary steps to maintain the integrity of my waste
structure. In addition, I have had to deal with a neighbor that does not comprehend the importance of
managing a waste stream under these unusual circumstances. I would ask that the Division please take in
account the equipment malfunction that led to the complaint and also the past and current operating
environment when reviewing this case.
With Kind Regards,
R.M. Hayes
Owner
Cc Doug Niemond
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.

NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR �,
WAYNE MCDL'VITr.",: _
$xcRETARY .
r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
October 12, 1999
1 ►/
C �► ►01 1W 0 C 1
Mr. Raymond M. Hayes
494 Stricklands Cross Roads
Four Oaks, North Carolina 27524
Subject: Notice of Violation
R.M. Hayes Farm
General Permit No, AWS510034
Facility #51-34
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Hayes:
RAi eiGH-REGIONAL OFFICE
Q r
c r
S �
On September 22, 1999, Mr, John Hunt and Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a complaint investigation and compliance inspection of the
subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to determine
compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management Regulations.
As a result of the investigation the following violation was determined:
In accordance with the guidelines established for the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); waste was not being properly applied to one of the spray
fields. By your admission and as observed by at least one Johnston County Deputy
Sheriff on September 13, 1999, waste was being applied across the property boundary.
The waste was observed to have impacted neighboring property as recorded in the
complaint to the Johnston County Sheriff's Office and subsequently to this office.
During the investigation by this office there was no evidence observed that indicated
waters of the state were impacted as a result of this event.
The following deficiency was noted during the compliance inspection:
Inadequate Waste Utilization Plan: The CAWMP identifies fields designated for
application rates to be harvested for hay and a different reduced rate for fields to be
grazed. At the time of the inspection there was at least one field designated for hay that
was being grazed.
3BOO BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Mr. R. M. Hayes
Please respond to this Notice within 15 days of receipt. You should include in your
response the actions that you will take to address this violation and these deficiencies.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this inspection please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc:
Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Ken York, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
Mr. Doug Neimond, TDM
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
0

r

'TWm.wA
NCDENR
Nam" C..Roup w.[XwA anew or
NEW MAILING ADDRESS:
RALEIGFI REGIONAL
OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OW
ENvIRON14ENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
1 628 MAIL SEFMCE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC P-7699- 1 628
PHYSICAL LOCAT[ON (NCT A.
MAILING ADDRESS)
3800 BARRI=rr DRIVE, RM 1-01
RALEIQH, NC 27609
Voice: 9 19/57 1-4700
FAX: [phone] B
F
A
x
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW
MAILING ADDRESS! ! !
TO: �9Ygos FAX:
FROM:
SUBJECT:S'1 Err1=F *S �e�op r �- DATE: �Z�
MESSAQE:
i t - ---
e � S ►q o � -�e
►rzoy�
t= R IJe A k v ► gfJ� ., r : Il 4-4
✓c Q y a Sf��.

W,23/99 THU 11:56 FAX [phone] JCSO fa001
120 S. 'THIRD STREET
P. 0. so:c 1809 JOHNSTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE sTE�� 817ZELL
SHERIFF
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
OFFICE: 919,989.5010 www.jeso.org FAX: 919,989.5039
m
g1�q L
g
STER TOWELL FROM BRENDA H. PITTMAN
. DIV. OF WATER QUAILTY AT JCSO
MBER 571-4718 FAX NUMBER 919 989-5039
PHONE NO. 1 919-989-5012

09/23/99 THU 11:56 FAX [phone] jeso
•
p e.n-�
�.
INC]DENTIINVESTIGATiON `7�f- 3
S'Tnl1 �,m�
REPORT bete 1 Time R*pertrd S 'ty� T w TI S
060
n
NC
#�
CrEfn* ! lricident(sl
Q Attempt
As Found S T W T t' S
La51 Knnpn Sew» S T
Z
n
09,
Tr�ll
O
Tiso11Ci\T
Cmplere�0
'r ,,.
Crime Incident
Q AnA�
Locatbn of Ineidens
Offenae Tract
Z
-
2
❑
W-r-u:1gDS 1Ws
A 3
crime Incid*rd
Attempt
P iae Type Victim Reslaertoa Type
©Complete
gi�ewEm'ogle Family ❑ Multi Family
0
Her Attacked or Committed
Forcible
i Tools
,l '��ma�c�'
61 a kA""Z�l
,wea^pm
gyft ❑ NIA
❑
1
No
T"�:W
a
Tipe: Pt rson Business
Inu
aIgglAlcahol USWof
)rtims
❑ Society ❑ Government ❑ FrnanAhal Instilute
ram❑
arokcn Boors L Severe Lacera+ions u�-gl Yes ❑ Unknown
❑ Religious ❑ LE. OHic¢r Line of Duty ❑ OthL-([Unk
a tmomnl 0 Unconscious ❑Other Maier 0 No ❑NIA
Victird9usineai Memo {Last, Fdtt, MIddte)
Vlotim
005 1 Alp
Race
Set
Aalationsi
lIstatus61
£
Cria
�
To Oftenn
Gt
❑ Non-Re:ioenr
1.14q
0
li Unknown
U
y
Home Address
Phame
- L' t
NametAddres7
�aus-70E GaLs)5B�� C- a77SS,4
9u in one
1 -coo-7
Model
FA.5,T,-M,
! �sn&A�C
41
LidLisCODES'.
V-VlCtim (Denote V_, V31 O-Owner (if other than wlctim) R-RQportrnq P¢renii1 o[ner Shan victim►
Type: ❑ Person 0 Bu9!ne53 h Society ❑ Crevomment (1 Anancial Intlitute 0 Religious ❑ L.E. Olfitel Line o1 Ouiy (::0XherfUfihnown
Code
Name iwuut First. IUiddlo) -
Victim
OOB f Age
Race
Sea
Crime
Y
G
Home Addmm
Home Phone
LIJ
7
0
Fsnployar Nam.OAddreaa
Business Phone
Type_ ❑ Person ❑ Business © Society ❑ government Financial Instltuto © Refialous Q L.E. 014cer Li" of Duty ❑ Ott,errUnknown
Cade
Nam» {LQ1 Kral. Mlddlal
VIM
DOE ! Jigs
me*
p
Grime
Ia.,
e
Mom* AA&VS%
Homo Phone
Emptayer NamdApdnm
Bualness Phone
Steeds
L-Lost S-Stofen R-Rxdvered a -Damaged Z-Seized E-Sumed C-CoueterleltiFortisd F.Found
Codes
iCneck "OJ" column i rec vered for other lurisdiCfiAn
Victim
I
a
DCI
5talus
Value
led
OTY
Pr t+"rt Hen
Makelatadal
Serial Number
y1he
}
F-
W
a.
0
CL
NYmbd( al Venial" Stolen ,- Number Venicic R&tovWed
6�
S rtrisar Signature ape
eomptalmrit Slpnaaso
�-
urtmef In�e:tigalion
LJ Unlaunded ©JurenileMo Custody ❑ Ettrrtdition Occlincd
Fa-
ElIneefiye
ll��
0 Cleared by AneSt ❑ Refuse to Cooperate
4
�
❑ QosaNGleared
❑ Cleared DY Jerre--t by Another Agency
❑ CloseelLeads 114mnusted
{
© DeaTh of 0,frendp, ❑ Prosecution Declined Pape i of
Rev 3192
ORIGINAL

THU 11:56 FAX. [phone] JC50
Page 2
C6003
09/23/99
Sraera
Cgda:
p)
C7'
7
Ck
LU
F
a
a
z
L. Levi S- ttosen A a Romvned D s DafnagBd Z s SOMW B 2 Bumed C- CauMmisit I "ed F � Found
OC:1
5faztfa
5er
Oup"
Typo NoaWm
9uspccted TYPa
Cheek rep m typQa o! a vvhy for early
Pa ge
$t►Y
Sale
Mfg
Lmponft
ow^dn9
Offender [Seed
Atwh mnjur, ❑ Y. ❑ Unk
' © No E] NIA
C.oynp or 0 Yea 0 Unk
❑ ma ❑ NfA
Otfendar 1
AW Apr,: Sax:
OBendor 2
e: R.=w Scar
OHeneter s
Ago". Haca: Sex'
Peirm" Oftu der
t mhftrrt Stoma
© Residem
{7 Nuriiesoa-f
❑ Unknown
ender 4
Ake: Rare: Sri
prhride 5
AgB' Race, save
OHendor 6
Age: w= so,
prone (lact, first, m
t_L(4zv
Alf.,-_ or rvlelararrre r'
Mom Address
meuAat v
Suslneas Addraa
Oc91 Age
Rana I
Sax
Hckght
Weight
Build
Nair Color
Nair Style
Asir Length
pya C.alot
Glasses
Seam. Mmkr Tadaoa, orarher distingui3fing feenpps (r.e_ Jim% tereign aesent voice charaderlat)os)
Hat .6rc)at[ SPkrV9louee
TIWS=rf
Coevsuh
PantmquT iskirt 6ocke
stew
Was S4jtlp6r t Armed? Type of WesDan
Direction of Travel
Node or Travel
ylrii
m2ka Modal
StirEc
t7o)or LirlLka
An
Name (kaar4lim4 middls)
DOB! Age
14ace
Say
OCA
Name Address.
Noma phone
Empkeyer
Phono
Suspect NaW r Sias tttallvated: Yea ❑ No ❑
IVaT*ative
Y aJ fTIA
L r-p1,qlJ.0j� N�
i �ttT fi, WI-rm-rE 5Zto k i 5 600
oP Atr k cwzlz rz-,-�Ek- S US tis ;-D
2ra�1 m - Fo2D � -. mrT c
L a � tmkuZ L)pi)r� -u2 fz s XT
v ►,1fD fi toe % -0im .0d
CL 11� o 2 TD �c
1*f PP-Q(>,YZXY UAt x> GG .r
eMc!!Tr' 9Q PGS !�nl V ED 0 72)C► No r�C
Uuc� tT W las �C 1 y,�j�1 Tp► � . � �V IS C D �p
^.V 4 L� �e+yr JV C3✓GJwr�` r IIGrA- `• �i7 �� w lC 1 ! 1
ORIGINAL
Fl v W92

09/23/99 'THU 11: 57 FAX [phone] _ _ _ _ JCSO• , _ - _ _ _-_ U 004
CDu s�� rF
2.ORI
NC 51DDOO
3 CONnNUA-nON TCY
o `ENTAFfYIN . AI�RESr
4- OCA FILE Na
OR_ 44,3a
. Narrrd+m
OLD
1
• L7G 1 T �=
PISS
CC EuS-vE2—D6-leu-, .,J
-ow Pic
- el
Otfioer name ! ID Osfcar Sigrc�xe
l4 g
Data
Date I lime Suemitmc
�a
���
�°� 3
lJol-ua
ORIGINAL
REV. S&P

C]MI -• 1 ".gig^ 17: 26 J SPEW- FATTY
F. 0;
refinance or otherwise cause the defendant's name to be removed
from any debts azsociated therewith.
(d) The defendant hereby releases any and all right,
title and interest in all vehicles and equipment not previously
listed specifically as the sole and separate property of the
deQQ4,t. The plaintiff hereby assumes complete responsibility
for all indebtedness related thereto and shall hold harmless and
indemnify the defendant from all liability related thereto.
(e) The plaintiff shall be granted a thirty (30) foot
access easement to his remaining property to ran alongside the dart
' 4 f�J and to be determined by a survey to be paid equally by the parties.
(f) The defendant hereby grants the plaintiff the right
to use up to four (4) acres of the five (5) acres adjoining the
defendant's residence to pump hog waste for ao long as the
plaintiff awns or operates the hog business. This night to use
shall not encroach on the "yard" or one acre of: land immediately
surrounding the defendant's residence. That this right to pump or.
this land shall terminate upon the plaintiff's transfer or
conveyance of the hog farm business or land upon which the hog farm
operates, or upon defendant's transfer or conveyance of the
residence.
(g) The defendant hereby grants the plaintiff access and
right to use the pond for fishing purposes and for watering
animals.
(h) Sho-.ild the defendant elect to sell her property, the
defendant hereby gzante to the plaintiff the first right of refusal
to buy at fair market or highest offer, including the defendant's
residence and five 0) acres and the 4.84 acres currently occupied
by Randy Hobson.

8- 03-1998 8 - S4AM FRUP1
NORTH CAROLINA
JOHNSTON COUNTY
BETTY L. HAM,
]PLAINTIFF
VS .
RAYMOND M. HAYE5,
DEFENDANT
says:
IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DISTRICT COURT DIVISION
FILE NO.
COMPLAINT
The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges and
1. The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the County
of Johnston and resident of the State of North Carolina and has
been for more than six months next preceding the institution of
this action. In fact, the plaintiff has been a citizen and
resident of the State of North Carolina for several years nest
preceding the institution of this action.
2. The defendant is a citizen and resident of the County
of Johnston and resident of the State of North Carolina and has
been for more than six months next preceding the institution of
this action. In fact, the plaintiff has been a citizen and
resident of the State of North Carolina for several years next
preceding the institution of this action.
3. The plaintiff and the defendant were married to each
other on August 21, 1992 in Johnston County, North Carolina, and
thereafter lived together as husband and wife until July 27,
1997, when they separated.
4. There were no children born of the marriage.
5. Since July 27, 1997, the plaintiff and the defendant
P 2

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
R.M. Hayes
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
6930 Devil Race Track
Four Oaks NC 27524
1 Zfflomow'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS510034
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Johnston County
Dear R.M. Hayes:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on September 15, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we
are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to R.M. Hayes, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the RM Hayes Farm TDM #9, located in Johnston
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 5240 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS510034 dated September 15, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition 11.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition 11I.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition II1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510034
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston oward, Jr.,
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality A&41
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary p H N R
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 15, 1997
R. M. Hayes
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
6930 Devil Race Track
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510034
RM Hayes Farm TDM #9
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Johnston County
Dear R. M. Hayes:
In accordance with your application received on September 9, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 51-34, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the RM Hayes Farm TDM #9, located in Johnston County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 5240 Feeder to Finish and the application to a minimum of 37.53 acres
of land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COG
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. 'A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
G '
_/-A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources 51-3 4
Division of Water Quality R
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
RECEIVED
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Opeftfldl 7ySECTj0N
The following questions have been completed utilizing information o`�n P le 9wilRoThe
Division. Please review the information for completeness and ma19§nM*A fP s
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division,�e
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date:
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities andV
1
Feld locations where animal waste is disposed; - %� IV
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Farm's name: RM Have
2. Print Land Owner's name: R.M. Hilyes _
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: 6930 Devil Race Track _
City: Four Oaks NC Zip: 27524
Telephone Number: 43&-9030
4. County where farm is located: tonc n
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Farm L�gcation: Strickland Crossroad Rd,
6, Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's 1 Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
51 - 34
l f
r S
(9
Ilk>
FORM: AWO G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3 .\ f

„( c r.i
III., OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: 51-34
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
5240 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Ezyes; I--] no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Type of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 44.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): 37
4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: lr 1.3 y 3_l3 `f Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YE or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, i S (Land Owner's name listed in question 1I.2), attest that
this application for ✓ (Farm name listed in question II.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if ail required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date 9/7
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name listed in question I1.6), attest that this
application for (Farm name listed in question I1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUINIBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

0WVER: RM. HAYES
F.4RVI NAME: R M. HAYES FARM TDM 9
FACILITY # SI-34
DESIGN CAPACITY: S320 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 6/3/93 PLAN COMPLETED BY CHRIS SMITH OF THE NRCS/JOHNS'TON
DISTRICT OFFICE. TTIE AGRONOMIC RATES OF THIS PLAN CAME FROM THE ORIGINAL 6/3/93 PLAN.
THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE
CALCULATION TABLES.
TT IS PI RMISSABLE FOR THE PLANTING OF OVERSEER ON THE BERMUDA HAY ON FIELD A D' SO
DESIRED BY MR. HAYES THE AGRONOMIC RATE WILL BE 50 LBS N PER/ACRE AND THE WINDOWS
SHALL BE MAR 1 —MAR 31.
By written. permission 'T8541 with GEB soil types By Thomas Rhodes will be the same crop rotation and agronomic
rate; as T8541. 6.95 acres total acres in the field.
THIS WASTE PLAN REPRESENTS,A COMPLETE TWO-YEAR ROTATION OF THE CROPLAND
PASTURELAND, FESCUE PASTURE, AND HAYLAND. THE PAN HAS BEEN DOUBLED TO REPRESENT
PAN ACCUMALATION FOR TWO -YEARS. THE ACREAGES OF THE PASTURELAND WITH SMALL GRAIN
OVERSEER HAVE BEEN DOUBLED IN THIS PLAN TO TAKE UP THE NUTRIENTS FOR A T'WO-YEAR
PERIOD, BECAUSE THESE CROPS DO NOT CHANGE IN TWO YEARS. THE CROPLAND REPRESENTS
THE USE OF A CORN/WINTER ANNUALISOYBEAN ROTATION, THE ACTUAL ACREAGES ARE USED
FOR THE CROPLAND, BECAUSE THE CROPS CHANGE EVERY OTHER YEAR. ACREAGES MAY BE
CONFUSING 13Y SEEING DOUBLE THE ACREAGES FOR THE TWO-YEAR ROTATION REVERT TO MAP
FOR ACTUAL ACRES USED.
T399 F(1),T553 F(UNI ), T581 F(2) Will now be applied with conventional hard hose traveler. These fields have
had wettable acres determined as depicted by maps and calculations. Field C has been changed from Fescue Pasture
to row crops in order to condition ground for waste application. Corn will have an agronomic Rate of 75 pounds N
per/acre. Field C will more than likely become a Stunmer and Winter Annual Rotation after Corn. Summer Annual
should have an agronomic rate of 110 pounds N per/acre and the Winter Annual will carry a 100 pounds N per/acre
agronomic rate. .
r.I' WI.LL TAKE A HIGH-LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO ACHIEVE SOME OF THE YIELDS DEPICTED BY
THE PLAN RATES THAT ORIGINATED FROM THE 6/3/93 PLAN. IN ADDITION IT SHOULD BE NOTED
THAT IN ORDER TO APPLY NEAR OR ON THE GRASSED WATERWAY SWELL LOCATED IN FIELD C IT
WILL TAKE AN EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO APPLY THE SPRAYFIELD WITH THE
HARI) HOSE TRAVEL, EQUIPMENT AND MANAGE THE GRASSED WATERWAY AT A LEVEL THAT
COULD RECEIVE WASTE WATER IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRCS STANDARDS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY
TO UTILIZE THE HONEYWAGON TO APPLY THIS FIELD IF FIELD CONDITIONS PROMPT THE USE OF
THIS ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT. THE AREA HAS BEEN MAPPED AND DENOTED AS A HIGH
MANAGE IvfENT AREA ON THE IRRIGATION MAP.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD FOR THE
USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT, ALI, FIELDS MUST MEET
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR. HAYES PLANS TO APPLY SWINE
WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IRS SPECMIC WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC
LOADING OF THE SOILS,
812�7�QCti , 8/22/06
li - - - --- �'-�'---
t0 G. KENNEDY MR. R.M. HAYES
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST OWNER/OPERATOR
'j JINN 2 7

5/�-T//06
Field: Lane Spacing.-
/-Vf-,�/!-TYPO: - !E;i44 4-e
Lane Diameter-.
Start End Area'.
Midd'e Area:
SLOJI Fmd Axa: r2 ---
I'owl
t-anci Field: Type: Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter:
Start End Area:
Middle Area:
Stop End Area:
Total AR'a:
La iw�
Start Fnd Area:
Middle A rtnv
Stop End Area:
Total Arq;x
Lane:
Start Eud Arew
Middle Area:
Stop End Arch:
Total Area:
Field:
Type:
Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter:
Field: Type: Lane Spacing:___
Lane Diameter:

fTl
rn

,- �r%� (F)1
AC.
/"� I 71v-e-,
-553 (F')UNI
.00 AC,
T-581 (F)2
4.00 AC.
NOTE: ALL AREAS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED ARE:
APPLIED BY 4000 GAL. HONEY WAGON.

ALA AREAS HIGHLxGHTED
HONEY WAGON.

5f3i1o6
Lane: � Field: 7 ,5f�FP2 Type: /A/ L,E Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter
Start lArea: -M L E qo--
Middle Arca: d?q'rQ• 9Ir6(06 A/13-56a
Stop End Area: 1� ' � O
Total Arcs;); /Ft ," �X -70 6 T�
Lone: --'.,� --Field: %IFype: S/�(7 Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter: 0 r
Start End Area: -7�9L,g 462© .fit- _ B �,(��[•
Middle Area: "%, �•i �`f »�(O� 3.Q-�jf�.
Stop Emd Area:
Total Arta:
Lane: Px Field:Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter:
Start l nd Are i' %�"�G7 a '�
- �? /t �•
_
Middle Area: w�O CO,
-_-
Stop Fod Area:
Total Area: 0 �/tC. d�l4tt• C/. /�
- - ['
Lane: --Field: ��� `� I - Type-. 1,6- Lane SpacinE' - lv
Lane Diameter:
Start End A]-c;r:
Mldd. leArea i Q�Q.�X �• ��a _ _ -- � ��,
Stop lard Area:3L�� "� r� _ t✓a`l �..
Total Area:
•.
t6 E -W f

Ii"11 TO 11"1:3i"z;'1._'1{i'.lZ'!':iI .;r;;'Y.1_�.: t/2i) )3'
OWNER: R.M HAYES _ _ ._.. .
FARM NAME.R.M. HA YES FARM TDM 9
FACILITY # 51-34
DESIGN CAPACITY: 5320 FEEDER TO FINISH
TIES PLAN IS A REVISION OF TIME 6/3/93 PLAN COMPLETED BY CHRIS SMITH OF THE
NRCS/JOHNSTON DISTRICT OFFICE. THE AGRONOMIC RATES OF THIS PLAN CAME FROM
THE ORIGINAL 6/3/93 PLAN. THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM
AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE CALCULATION TABLES.
IT IS PERMISSABLE FOR THE PLANTING OF OVERSEED ON THE BERMUDA HAY ON FIELD A
IF SO DESIRED BY MR. HAYES THE AGRONOMIC RATE WILL BE 50 LBS N PER/ACRE AND
TIME WINDOWS SHALL BE MAR 1 — MAR 31.
By written permission T854I with GEB soil types By Thomas Rhodes will be the same crop rotation and
agronomic rate as T8541. 6.95 acres total acres in the field.
THIS WASTE PLAN REPRESENTS A COMPLETE TWO-YEAR ROTATION OF THE CROPLAND
PASTURELAND, FESCUE PASTURE, AND HAYLAND. THE PAN HAS BEEN DOUBLED TO
REPRESENT PAN ACCUMALATION FOR TWO -YEARS, THE ACREAGES OF THE
PASTURELAND WITH SMALL GRAIN OVERSEED HAVE BEEN DOUBLED IN THIS PLAN TO
TAKE UP THE NUTRIENTS FOR A TWO-YEAR PERIOD, BECAUSE THESE CROPS DO NOT
CHANGE IN TWO YEARS. THE CROPLAND REPRESENTS THE USE OF A CORN/WINTER
ANNUAL/SOYBEAN ROTATION. THE ACTUAL ACREAGES ARE USED FOR THE CROPLAND,
BECAUSE THE CROPS CHANGE EVERY OTHER YEAR. ACREAGES MAY BE CONFUSING BY
SEEING DOUBLE THE ACREAGES FOR THE TWO-YEAR ROTATION REVERT TO MAP FOR
ACTUAL ACRES USED.
MR. 1 [AYES WILL INCORPRATE THE USE OF A 4000 GALLON 14ONEYWAGON OWNED BY
HIM TO APPLY T399 F(1),T553 F(UNI), T581 F(2). THE HONEYWAGON HAS BEEN INSPECTED
AND CAN MEET THE DEMANDS IF NEEDED TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS IF NEEDED.
IT WILL TAKE A HIGH-LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO ACHIEVE SOME OF THE YIELDS
DEPICTED BY THE PLAN RATES THAT ORIGINATED FROM THE 6/3/93 PLAN. IN ADDITION
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IN ORDER TO APPLY NEAR OR ON THE GRASSED WATERWAY
SWELL LOCATED IN FIELD C 1T WILL TAKE AN EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL OF
MANAGEMENT TO APPLY THE SPRAYFIELD WITH THE HARD HOSE TRAVEL EQUIPMENT
AND MANAGE THE GRASSED WATERWAY AT A LEVEL TI IAT COULD RECEIVE WASTE
WATER IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRCS STANDARDS. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO UTILIZE
THE HONEY -WAGON TO APPLY THIS FIELD IF FIELD CONDITIONS PROMPT THE USE OF
THIS ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT. THE AREA HAS BEEN MAPPED AND DENOTED AS A
HIGH MANAGEMENT AREA ON THE IRRIGATION MAP.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINl3 WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR. HAYES
PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ]-US SPECIFIC WASTE ANALYSIS
NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
1019/03 L'
^L 40NNIE G<KE EDY JR. R.M. HAYES
TECI-IMCAL SPECIALIST OWNER/OPERATOR

AGRIME'V'T' SERVICES INC
WAM MANAGEMENT C014SULTAN M
June 27, 2000
Mrs. Margaret O'Keefe
Division of Soil & Water
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mrs. O'Keefe:
P.O. BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, N.C. 28518
OFFICE: [phone]
MOBILE: [phone]
This letter is to address the annual compliance review conducted for R.M. Hayes (51-
34). This facility was flagged for a wettable acre determination. As you are aware
we have already begun the process of addressing the wetted acre rule for farms
either pended or flagged. The wettable acres coincide with the waste plan and should
meet minimum criteria to exempt this facility from the current wetted acre rule. Please
review enclosed maps and wup completed for this farm and re-evaluate the current
wettable acre status. Please call if you have any questions.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services, Inc.
Cc R.M. Hayes
Johnston: SWCD,
Doug Niemond

.,%Ii.�.c Si&i r1
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
DATE 06/27/00 FN = 51-34
Producer: RM HAYES
Location: 494 B STRICKLAND CROSSROADS ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: FEEDER TO FINISH
Number of Animals: 5320
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
Page 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (GALLONS, FT3, TONS, ETC.)
5320 hogs x 3.8 tons waste/hogs/year =
20216 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER
YEAR
5320 hags x 4.6 PAN/hogs/year = 24472
lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD
LBS COMM
**
LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE
AW N PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
579 D wag/gil BP 4.1
205
10.68
2189.4
2449E gil BP 4.1
205
3.72
762.6
1188 A gil BH 8
400
4.3
1720
1188 C- blanton FP 3.5
150
12.44
1866
8541 F(leased) GEB C 75
93.75 15
24.23
1908.1125
8541—F(ieased) GEB WA 1
100
24.23
2423
8541 F(leased) GEB DSB 28
1 12
24.23
2713.76
457 B(leased) BNB C 60
75 15
14.26
855.6
457 —B(leased) BNB WA 1
100
14.26
1426
457 B(leased) BNB DSB i 8
72
14.26
1026.72
579_244' D,E SG 1
50
14.4
720
Total 17611.193
-- Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of -NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 3
TABLE 2: ACRES UTILIZED WITH 4000 GALLON HONEYWAGON OWNED BY PRODUCER
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE 8 CLASS- CROP YIELD
LBS
COMM
** *LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW
PER AC
AC
USED
581 2 BNB C 60
75
15
4 240
581 —2 BNB WA 1
100
4 400
581 2 BNB DSB 18
72
4 288
553 UN1 GIL BH 8
400
18 7200
399 1 GIL BP 4.1
205
14.46 2964.3
399 -•1 GIL SG 1
50
14.46 723
0
Total 11815.3
Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
over seeding,
* Ibs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
LBS N
APPLY
CROP CODE CROP
UNITS PER UNIT
MONTH
BH HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -HAY
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
C CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
MAR-JUNE
SG SMALL GRAIN OVER SEED
AC
50
SEPT-APR
SA SUMMER ANNUALS
AC
110
APR -MAY
WA WINTER ANNUALS
AC
100
SEPT-APR
BC HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
BP HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -PASTURE
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
FC TALL FESCUE -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FH TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FP TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
SB SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
DSB DOUBLE CROP SOY BEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
CO COTTON
TONS
0.1
MAY-JUN
W WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
OCT-MAR

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 54.06 17611.193
TABLE 2 20.23 11815.3
TOTAL 74.29 29426.493
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 24472
*** BALANCE-4954.493
"* This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately ?4L L,pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within feet of the top of the dike.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 5
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation design signer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to property irrigate the
acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates
and amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid
Call your Agriment Services representative for assistance in determining
the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate
prior to beginning the application of your waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION: SEE ATTACHMENT

OWNER: R M. HAYES
FARM NAME: RM. HA YES FARM TDM 9
FACILITY # 51-34
DESIGNCAPACITY. 5320 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 6/3/93 PLAN COMPLETED BY CHRIS SMITH OF THE
NRCS/JOHNSTON DISTRICT OFFICE. THE AGRONOMIC RATES OF THIS PLAN CAME FROM
THE ORIGINAL 613/93 PLAN, THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM
AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE CALCULATION TABLES.
THIS WASTE PLAN REPRESENTS A COMPLETE TWO-YEAR ROTATION OF THE CROPLAND
PASTURELAND, FESCUE PASTURE, AND HAYLAND. THE PAN HAS BEEN DOUBLED TO
REPRESENT PAN ACCUMALATION FOR TWO -YEARS, THE ACREAGES OF THE
PASTURELAND WITH SMALL GRAIN OVERSEED HAVE BEEN DOUBLED IN THIS PLAN TO
TAKE UP THE NUTRIENTS FOR A TWO-YEAR PERIOD, BECAUSE THESE CROPS DO NOT
CHANGE IN TWO YEARS. THE CROPLAND REPRESENTS THE USE OF A CORN/WINTER
ANNUAL/SOYBEAN ROTATION. THE ACTUAL ACREAGES ARE USED FOR THE CROPLAND,
BECAUSE THE CROPS CHANGE EVERY OTHER YEAR. ACREAGES MAYBE CONFUSING BY
SEEING DOUBLE THE ACREAGES FOR THE TWO-YEAR ROTATION REVERT TO MAP FOR
ACTUAL ACRES USED.
MR. HAYES WILL INCORPRATE THE USE OF A 4000 GALLON HONEYWAGON OWNED BY
HIM TO APPLY T399 F(I),T553 F(UNI), T581 F(2). THE HONEYWAGON HAS BEEN INSPECTED
AND CAN MEET THE DEMANDS IF NEEDED TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS IF NEEDED.
IT WILL TAKE A HIGH-LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO ACHIEVE SOME OF THE YIELDS
DEPICTED BY THE PLAN RATES THAT ORIGINATED FROM THE 6/3/93 PLAN. IN ADDITION
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IN ORDER TO APPLY NEAR OR ON THE GRASSED WATERWAY
SWELL LOCATED IN FIELD C IT WILL TAKE AN EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL OF
MANAGEMENT TO APPLY THE SPRAYFIELD WITH THE HARD HOSE TRAVEL EQUIPMENT
AND MANAGE THE GRASSED WATERWAY AT A LEVEL THAT COULD RECEIVE WASTE
WATER IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRCS STANDARDS. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO UTILIZE
THE HONEYWAGON TO APPLY THIS FIELD IF FIELD CONDITIONS PROMPT THE USE OF
THIS ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT. THE AREA HAS BEEN MAPPED AND DENOTED AS A
HIGH MANAGEMENT AREA ON THE IRRIGATION MAP,
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR. 1 AYES
PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE ANALYSIS
NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
6/26/00 6/26/00
RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR. R.M. HAYES
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST OWNERIOPERATOR

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Plans and Specifications
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Local NRCS office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land
to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an updated Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips and Standard
390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infil-
tration rate such that runoff does not occur off -site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
event, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
Page 6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover'crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See standard
393 _ Filter Strips)
12, Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways,
or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
into water courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24-hour storm event in addition to one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and
and shall be fenced, as necessary to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 8
21. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
pre plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
22. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
23. Waste shall be tested within sixty days of utilization and soil shall
be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
years.
24. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina State regulations or other States' regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 9
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
I (we) know that an expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there be no discharge
of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state
from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and
will be available for review by DWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rate that no runoff
occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: RM HAYES
SIGNATURE: DATE: 7 ��
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
AFFILIATION: Agriment Services Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville 18 r
SIGNATURE: ^.i� DATE: jh12P41

PRODUCER: .... ...... ....................................................... R.M. HAYES
LOCATION: .................................................................... 6920 DEVILS RACETRACK RD.
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
TELEPHONE... .......................... .................................... [phone]
TYEP OF OPERATION: .... ....... ....... ............................ FEEDER TO FINISH SWINE
NUMBER OF ANIMALS :............................................... 5320 HOGS DESIGN CAPACITY
HARD HOSE TRAVELING GUN SYSTEM
(1) MAKE AND MODEL9:......................................... ABI IRRIGATION
(2) HOSE LENGTH: .................................................... 850'
(3) HOSE INSIDE DIAMETER ................................. 3"
(4) GUN MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER .................. NELSON BIG GUN 100 SERIES
(5) GUN RING NOZZLE SIZE .................................... 0.86"
(6) GUN ARC ANGLE(S)............................................ 180° & 330°
(7) GUN WETTED DIAMETER .................................. 275'
(8) GUN PRESSURE ................................................... 70 PSI
FIELD (A. )
LANE 1
➢ SINGLE LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...........193'
➢ START -END AREA ................ ....0.57 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................193'(.9 x 275')/ 43,560 = 1.10 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.48 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.57 AC. + 1.10 AC. + 0.48 AC. = 2.15 AC
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES ..................... Z15AG
FIELD (B)
LANE 1
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...... 432'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................432'(275' / 2 + 220' 12)I 43,560 = 2.45 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.55 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 2.35 AC. + 0.55 AC. = 3.67AC.

LANE 2
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .......429'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ ?MIDDLE AREA..........................................429' x 220' / 43,560 = 2.17 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. + 2.10 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 3.32 AC.
LANE 3
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......298'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................254'(275' 12 + 220' 12)/43,560 = 1.69 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.00 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 1.44 AC. + 0.00 AC. = 2.36 AC.
LANE 4
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......228'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.62 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................228'(275' 12 + 178' 12)I 43,560 = 1.19 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA ..................................0.62 AC. + 1.19 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.32 AC.
LANE 5
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ..... 280'
➢ START -END AREA...................................0.62 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ......................................... 280'(275' / 2 + 178' 12)I 43,560 = 1.46 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA.................................0.62 AC. + 1.46 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.59 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................14.26 AG
FIELD (C)
LANE 1
➢ SINGLE LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...........152'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.57 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ................................... ....... 152'(.9 x 275')/ 43,560 = 0.86 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.48 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA...................................0.57 AC. + 0.86 AC. + 0.48 AC. = 1.91 AC.

LANE 2
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...... 177'
➢ START -END AREA .................................... 0.64 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ........... ............................... 177'(275' 12 + 200' / 2)/ 43,560 = 0.97 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA ........................ ... ...0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.64 AC. + 0.97 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 2.13 AC.
LANE 3
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ....
➢ START -END AREA ..................................
➢ MIDDLE AREA ........................................
➢ STOP -END AREA .....................................
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA ...............................
.283'
.0.64 A.C.
.283'(275' / 2 + 200' 12)I 43,560 = 1.54 AC.
.0.00 AC.
.0.64 AC. + I.54 AC. + 0.00 AC. = 2.18 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................6.22 AG
FIELD (D)
LANE 1
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......3 l 6'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0,62 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................316'(275' 12 + 182' 12)/ 43,560 = 1.66 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA ................................. :0.62 AC. + 1.66 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.79 AC.
LANE 2
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH.
➢ START -END AREA ...............................
➢ MIDDLE AREA .....................................
➢ STOP -END AREA ..................................
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA .............................
....270'
....0.62 AC.
.... 270'(275' / 2 + 182' 12)I 43,560 = 1.42 AC.
....0.51 AC.
....0.62 AC. + 1.42 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.55 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................5.34 AC.

FIELD (E)
LANE 1
➢ SINGLE LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...........142'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.57 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA .......................................... 142'(.9 x 275')/ 43,560 = 0.81 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA ........... ............................ 0,48 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.57 AC. + 0.81 AC. + 0.48 AC. = 1.86 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................1. 86 AG
FIELD_
LANE I
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...... 646'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................646'(275' / 2 + 220' / 2)/ 43,560 = 3.67 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.55 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 3.67 AC. + 0.55 AC. = 4.89 AC.
LANE 2
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ....... 739'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................739' x 220 / 43,560 = 3.73 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. + 3.73 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 4.90 AC.
LANE 3
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ....... 726'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ..........................................726' x 220 / 43,560 = 3.63 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA ....................................... 0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. +3.63 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 4.82 AC.
LANE 4
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .......224'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ................... ....................... 224' x 220 / 43,560 = 1.13 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. + 1.13 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 2.28 AC.

LANE 5
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .....
➢ START END AREA ..................................
➢ MIDDLE AREA ........................................
➢ STOP END AREA .....................................
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA ................................
LANE 6
..260'
..0.63 AC.
..260' x 220 / 43,560 = 1.31 AC.
..0.52 AC.
..0.63 AC. + 1.31 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 2.46AC.
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...... 148'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................148'(275' / 2 + 220' / 2)/ 43,560 = 0.84 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.5 5 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 0.84 AC. + 0.55 AC. = 2.06 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................24.2,3 AC.
TOTAL WETTABLE ACRES
es
FIELD(A)...........................................................
2.15 AC.
FIELD(B)...........................................................'14.26
AC.
3 ,45
FIELD (C)..........................................................
6.22 AC.
3 E 3
FIELD (D)..........................................................
5.34 AC.
FIELD(E)................................................... I.......
1.86 AC.
4 ti K 1
FIELD(F)...........................................................24.23
AC.
TOTAL ACRES..................................................54.06
AC.

Irrigated Acreage Dctemtination Procedures
for WasLrwater Application Equipment
HARD HOSE TRAVELING GUN SYSTEM
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET *
1. Make and model number
2. Hose length
ABI UMGATION
850 [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) 3 [inch]
3.
Gun make and model number
NELSON SR10OR BIG GUN
4.
Gun nozzle size 0.86
[inch], YES ring orifice,
NO taper bore orifice
5.
Gun arc angle
330,180
[degrees]
6.
Travel lane spacing 220
[feet]. Indicate whether NO
uniform or YES random.
Number of exterior hydrants
13 Number of interior hydrants 5
7.
Gun wetted diameter 275
[feet]. NO measured or
YES based on gun chart.
8.
Gun pressure 70
[psi] NO
observed at working gauge,
YES
determined from gun chart NO
calculated (show calculations)
9.
"Operating pressure at hose reel [psi]
observed at working gauge or
10. **Supply line size
11. **Supply line length
provided by owner.
[inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
[feet] (maximum pumping distance)
12. "Supply line type PVC aluminum
13. **Pump make and model number
14. **Pump capacity [gpm]
15. **Engine make and model number
or
16. **Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] [rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that you field determine wetted diameter and operating pressure
at the reel and gun.
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and slop of the sprinkler cart for each
travel lane and show the distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line. Irrigated acres are
determined by the travel lane.
** Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Field Data Worksheet.
*** Information furnished by /
y c and/or
'4
S g t cur of owner or facili representative Signature of lec ical specialist
R.M. HAYES and/or RONNIE G. KENNEDY, JR.
Printed name of owner or facility representative Printed name of technical specialist
Date n_ Z 7 o o Date G ,2 7 D 5
+.n......-..-�.. --r• •--...
R. M. HAYES

Irrigated Acreage Ddcmrination Procedures
for WaAcwater Application Equipment
HARD HOSE TRAVELING GUN SYSTEM
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification)
51-34 Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation
Existing irrigation system
Ncw/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes
# of Interior lanes # of Exterior lanes
[feet] Length of pull (1)
# of Interior lanes # of Exterior lanes
[feet] Length of pull (2)
# of Interior lanes # of Exterior lanes
[feet] Length of pull (3)
4. Wetted diameter
[feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing
Hydrant spacing [feet]
[ as a percentage of dia.]
6. Hydrant layout
Multiple Single
Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted truer
able and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location,,
rr,
Travel lane length (1)
if
LI
Table
travel lane length (1) (Sum: a + b + c)
(2) interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (2)
(Pull length X Wetted width
(a) Acres stop end of pull from Table
Total acres for travel lane length (2) (Sum: a + b + c)
[feet])/ 43,560
Column
Column
[feet] )/ 43,560
Column
Travel lane length (3). Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (3)
(Pull length X Wetted width [feet])/ 43,560
(a) Acres slop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per travel lane length (1)
(b) Acres per travel lane Ingth (2)
(c) Acres per travel lane length (3)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
X
# Lanes =
Acres
X
# Lanes =
Acres
Total CAWMP wettable ac Zfi%eld (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) 0.00 Acres
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: /rr Date: `' G

v
� � ' .,. ___�'' (,�•• �' '',.,�' � • ill
J 1' �'.'_'�'•• t �•y»•'�'"'`��'t _''F ! L .rE i'� I t r.
Ike
IF
'�` � % • "�"`�i � .� `" ,�1. ::�:r fie'`-yv�rr'� ,r'"' �' j 1.'� `tiy ;-� F: i�' �:,'• p r. '�•�•
fs' S �.�.,`,•,._ ` off Q: • '^�, —'.�'
-:r � •x .+ �, 4��rirww+ o ,1.� +' yf.F�,.r++rrr y `• � � ...y..r,,,,..w�.•� ,
F�/ I �`�. i,. •'� ��s'r'�`� I
_�. , ,~� { __--___-__ - -- '` • r, DTI'"` •y,� _ ; J }'�' •' ,

' Ia.5ryRc
01f7VER: R. M. HAYES
F4Rlb1 NAME: RM. MA YES FARM TDM 9
FACILITY # 51-34
DESIGN CAPACITY: 5320 FEEDER TO FINISH
TI-11S PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 6/3/93 PLAN COMPLETED BY CHRIS SMITH OF THE NRCS/JOHNSTON
DISTRICTOFFICE. THE AGRONOMIC RATES OF THIS PLAN CAME FROM THE ORIGINAL 6I3/93 PLAM
THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYSTHE HE SAME IN THE
CALCULATION TABLES.
IT ES PERMISSABLE FOR'1HE PLANTING OF OVERSEED ON THE 13EIZMUDA 14AY ON FIELD A IF SO
DESIRED BY MR. HAYES THE AGRONOMIC RATE WILL BE 50 LBS N PER/ACRE AND THE WTNDOWS
SHALL BE MAR l — MAR 31.
By written pennission T854 l with GEB soil types By Thomas Rhodes will be the same crop rotation and agronomic
rate. as T8.541. 6.95 acres total acres in the field.
THIS WASTE PLAN REPRESENTS A COMPLETE: TWO-YEAR ROTATION OF THE CROPLAND
PASTIJR 1AND, FESCUE PASTURE, AND HAYLAND. THE PAN HAS BEEN DOUBLED TO REPRESENT
PAN ACCUIVIALA'HON FOR TWO -YEARS. THE ACREAGES OF I IE PASTURELAND WITH SMALL GRAIN
OVERSEED HAVE BEEN DOUBLED INTHIS PLAN TO TAKE UP THE NUTRIENTS FOR A TWO-YEAR
PERIOD, BECAUSE THESE. CROPS DO NOT CHANGE IN TWO YEARS. THE CROPLAND REPRESENTS
THE USE OF A CORN/WINTER ANNUAL/SOYBEAN ROTATION. THE ACTUAL ACREAGES ARE: USED
FOR T> IE CROPLAND, BECAUSE THE CROPS CHANGE EVERY OTHER YEAR. ACREAGES MAY BE
CONFUSING BY SEEING DOUBLE THE ACREAGES FOR THE TWO-YEAR ROTATION REVERT TO MAP
FOR ACTUAL ACRES USED.
T399 F(1),T553 F(UN1), T581 F(2) Will now be applied with conventional hard hose traveler. These fields have
had wettable acres determined as depicted by maps and calculations. Field C has been changed from Fescue Pasture
to row crops in order to condition ground for waste application. Corn will have an agronomic Rate of 75 pounds N
per/acre. Field C will more than likely become a Sumner and Winter Annual Rotation after Corn. Swrinier Annual
should have an agronomic rate of 110 pounds N per/acre and the Winter Annual will carry a 100 pounds N per/acre
agronomic; rate.
IT WILL TAKE A HIGH-LEVEL OF MANAGF,MENf 1.0 ACHIEVE SOME OF THE YIELDS DEPICTED 13Y
THE PLAN RATES THAT ORIGINATED FROM THE 6/3/93 PLAN. IN ADDITION IT SHOULD BE NOTED
TH.KF IN ORDER TO APPLY NEAR OR ON THE GRASSED WATER WAY SWELL LOCATED IN FIELD C IT
WILL TAKE AN EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO APPLY THE SPRAYFIELD WITH THE
HARD HOSE TItAVEL� EQUIPN ENT AND MANAGE THE GRASSED WATERWAY AT A LEVEL THAT
E COULD RCEIVE WASTE WATER IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRCS STANDARDS. IT MAY BE NECESSARY
TO U11I.IZE THE HONEYWAGON TO APPLY 'PHIS FIELD IF FIELD CONDITIONS PROMPT THE USE: OF
THIS ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT. THE AREA HAS BEEN MAPPED AND DENOTED AS A HIGH
MANAGElVIENf AREA ON TE-IE IRRIGATION MAP.
NO WASTE SHOULD E3E APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD FOR THE
USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS MUST MEET
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT'S WHEN USED. MR. HAYES PLANS TO APPLY SWINE
WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE.ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC
LOADING] OF THE SOILS-
�Ot IE G. KENNEDY JR.
i ECHNiCAL SPECIALIST
8�//22/00/6�/7
R.M. HAYES
OWNER/OPFRATOR
IV E
JUN 2 2�07
1 Duo K�14.EIN

P,a.� �/5,,/o
Lane: Field:
�T=.5RF4�- Type: SIN 1 E Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter, Q 1
Start I.',rtd. koa:
/ r3LE —_ E RV r �./
V •� f i .
Middle Area:
_
91I Q, 9 Va (6 90_s(p d
Stop End Area:
_T L Ec)_.'_
_ —� '✓' �It .
`Dotal Area: _
6) T ACC ." �0• Isyy. "7/"(� Y l/fC .
_ aZ V_51 'e.
Lanc: _
F.ieId:. l I�,jf i Ype: - /� f��
Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter:
Start End Area:
-7�6Le ego -l{ -- B
�J•`f7.�.
Middle Area:
�6'7
Stop [;13d Area:
Total Area:
�• �/�C..i . ��_"i� /•�/4
.� /5;C't-.
Lane: ---�
---field: '7 bWfiype-. , 51 � ''�
—
Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter: a f
Start End Are;:s:
14M46 4�10.{G
Middle Area:
_✓..� o.Q 1—e0.j+'"��j
Stop End Area:
4,oW- Ao-'��
Total Area:
loe.
r
Lane:
Field: ��� � % Type:
Lane Spacing: �
—
.
Lane Diameter: l
' 6a
Start End Area:
Middle Are;i:
Stop Fild Arew
Total Area:
or-,
boo. QXa�/�!�o

51ylle6
Ir-
Lane: - � Field: % % Type: �/ G.,f✓ Lane Spacing:_ '
Lane Diameter:
Start End Area: 6'
Middle Area: `Q�j ��• ��� � f ��j � � - "f ��.
Stop l::nd Area: Lam(,
"Total Area: C.�• �7� � V � ��!" . T . I�/;l`-C , � = ,�. `7 �
Lane: Field: Type: Lane Spacing.
Lane Diameter:
Start End Area:
Middle Area:
Stop End Area:
Total Area.: -
Lane
Start 1 and Area:
Middle Arca;
Stop End Arca:
"Total Area:
Lane:
Start End Arca:
Middle Arca:
Stop Lad Area:
Total Area:
Field:
Type:
T` ield: Type:
Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter:
Lane Spacing:
Lane Diameter:

-9

fj
T 13 n (F)1
AC.
y 2/t,;- r
-553 (F)UN1
.00 AC.
T-581 (F)2
4.00 AC.
NOTE: ALL AREAS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED ARE
APPLIED BY 4000 GAL. HONEY WAGON.

T-553 (F)UN1
9.00 AC.
T-581 (F)2
4.00 AC.
NOTF, ALL AREAS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED ARE
APPLIED BY 4000 GAL. HONEY WAGON.

/J>L
r
�. Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
DATE 06/27/00 FN = 51-34
RM HAYES
494 B STRICKLAND CROSSROADS ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
910-934-0106
FEEDER TO FINISH
5320
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
Page 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (GALLONS, FT3, TONS, ETC.)
5320 hogs x 3.8 tons wastelhogs/year =
20216 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
5320 hogs x 4.6 PAN/hogs/year = 24472
lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD S01L TYPE & C!_ASS- CROP YIELD
LBS COMM
LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE
AW N PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
579 D wag/gil BP 4.1
205
10.68
2189.4
2449 E gil BP 4.1
205
3.72
762.6
�— 1188 A gi I B H 8
400
4.3
1720
1188 C blanton FP 3.5
150
12.44
1866
8541 F(lea—se d} GEB C 75
93.75 15
24.23
1908.1125
8541 MF(leased) GEB WA 1
100
24.23
2423
8541 F(leased) GEB DSB 28
112
2423
2713.76
457 B(leased) BNB C 60
75 15
14.26
855.E
457 —B(ieased) BNB WA 1
100
14.26
1426
457 B(leased) BNB DSB 18
72
14.26
1026.72
579_244' D,E SG 1
50
14.4
720
Total 17611.193
Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

I TI-V-1 d 4011114ir�1i1;9I11 12►Tk
Page 3
TABLE 2: ACRES UTILIZED WITH 4000 GALLON HONEYWAGON OWNED BY PRODUCER
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE &CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
Comm '*
"LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
581
2 BNB
C
60
75
15 4
240
581
--2
BNB
WA
1
100
4
400
581
2 BNB
DSB
18
72
4
288
553
UN1
GIL
BH
a
400
18
7200
399
1 GIL
BP
4.1
205
14.46
2964.3
399
1
GIL
SG
1
50
14.46
723
0
Total
11815.3
Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
" Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
over seeding.
' Ibs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
LBS N APPLY
UNITS PER UNIT MONTH
BH
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -HAY
TONS
50
MAR-OCT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
MAR-JUNE
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVER SEED
AC
50
SEPT-APR
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS
AC
110
APR -MAY
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
AC
100
SEPT-APR
BC
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
BP
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -PASTURE
TONS
50
MAR-OCT
FC
TALL FESCUE -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
SB
SOY BEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
❑SB
DOUBLE CROP SOY BEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
CO
COTTON
TONS
0.1
MAY-JUN
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
OCT-MAR

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 54.06 17611.193
TABLE 2 20.23 11815.3
TOTAL 74.29 29426.493
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 24472
*** BALANCE-4954.493
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elerrents Your production
facility will produce approximately �Wf(. i pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within - i eet of the top of the dike.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 5
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation design signer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates
and amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid
Call your Agriment Services representative for assistance in determining
the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate
prior to beginning the application of your waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION: SEE ATTACHMENT

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Local NRCS office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land
to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an updated Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips and Standard
390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infil-
tration rate such that runoff does not occur off -site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
event, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
Page 6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See standard
393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways,
or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
into water courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24-hour storm event in addition to one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18, A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and
and shall be fenced, as necessary to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 8
21. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
pre plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
22. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
23. Waste shall be tested within sixty days of utilization and soil shall
be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
years.
24. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina State regulations or other States' regulations.

".1
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 9
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
I (we) know that an expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there be no discharge
of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state
from a storm.event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and
will be available for review by DWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rate that no runoff
occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: RM HAYES
SIGNATURE: DATE: u
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
AFFILIATION: Agriment Services Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville 8518 /
SIGNATURE: DATE: 7 v�

OWNER: RM. HAYES
FARM NAME: R M. HAYES FARM TDM 9
FACILITY ## 51-34
DESIGN CAPACITY: 5320 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 6/3/93 PLAN COMPLETED BY CHRIS SMITH OF THE
NRCS/JOHNSTON DISTRICT OFFICE. THE AGRONOMIC RATES OF THIS PLAN CAME FROM
THE ORIGINAL 6/3/93 PLAN. THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM
AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE CALCULATION TABLES.
THIS WASTE PLAN REPRESENTS A COMPLETE TWO-YEAR ROTATION OF THE CROPLAND
PASTURELAND, FESCUE PASTURE, AND HAYLAND. THE PAN HAS BEEN DOUBLED TO
REPRESENT PAN ACCUMALATION FOR TWO -YEARS. THE ACREAGES OF THE
PASTURELAND WITH SMALL GRAIN OVERSEED HAVE BEEN DOUBLED IN THIS PLAN TO
TAKE UP THE NUTRIENTS FOR A TWO-YEAR PERIOD, BECAUSE THESE CROPS DO NOT
CHANGE IN TWO YEARS. THE CROPLAND REPRESENTS THE USE OF A CORN/WINTER
ANNUAL/SOYBEAN ROTATION. THE ACTUAL ACREAGES ARE USED FOR THE CROPLAND,
BECAUSE THE CROPS CHANGE EVERY OTHER YEAR. ACREAGES MAY BE CONFUSING BY
SEEING DOUBLE THE ACREAGES FOR THE TWO-YEAR ROTATION REVERT TO MAP FOR
ACTUAL ACRES USED.
MR. HAYES WILL .INCORPRATE THE USE OF A 4000 GALLON HONEYWAGON OWNED BY
HIM TO APPLY T399 F(1),T553 F(UN 1), T581 F(2). THE HONEYWAGON HAS BEEN INSPECTED
AND CAN MEET THE DEMANDS IF NEEDED TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS IF NEEDED.
IT WILL TAKE A HIGH-LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO ACHIEVE SOME OF THE YIELDS
DEPICTED BY THE PLAN RATES THAT ORIGINATED FROM THE 6/3/93 PLAN. IN ADDITION
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IN ORDER TO APPLY NEAR OR ON THE GRASSED WATERWAY
SWELL LOCATED IN FIELD C IT WILL TAKE AN EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL OF
MANAGEMENT TO APPLY THE SPRAYFIELD WITH THE HARD HOSE TRAVEL EQUIPMENT
AND MANAGE THE GRASSED WATERWAY AT A LEVEL THAT COULD RECEIVE WASTE
WATER IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRCS STANDARDS. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO UTILIZE
THE HONEYWAGON TO APPLY THIS FIELD IF FIELD CONDITIONS PROMPT THE USE OF
THIS ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT. THE AREA HAS BEEN MAPPED AND DENOTED AS A
HIGH MANAGEMENT AREA ON THE IRRIGATION MAP.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR, HAYES
PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE ANALYSIS
NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
6/26/00
. r
/ _,:: )eltolll
RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST
6/26/00
X RYn ley�-
R.M. HAYES
OWNERIOPERATOR

�., in'igamed Acreage Ddmm nation Procedures
for Wastewater Application &iuipmad
HARD HOSE TRAVELING GUN SYSTEM
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET *
1.
Make and model number
ABI IRRIGATION
2.
Hose length 850
[feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) 3 • [inch]
3.
Gun make and model number
NELSON SR10OR BIG GUN
4.
Gun nozzle size 0.86
[inch], YES ring orifice, NO taper bore orifice
5.
Gun arc angle
330,180 [degrees]
6.
Travel lane spacing 220
[feet]. Indicate whether NO uniform or YES random.
Number of exterior hydrants
13 Number of interior hydrants 5
7.
Gun wetted diameter 275
[feet]. NO measured or YES based on gun chart.
8.
Gun pressure 70
[psi] NO observed at working gauge,
YES
determined from gun chart NO calculated (show calculations)
9.
**Operating pressure at hose reel [psi] observed at working gauge or
10. **Supply line size
11. **Supply line length
12. **Supply line type PVC
13. **Pump make and model number
14. **Pump capacity
15. **Engine make and model number
or
[gpm]
provided by owner.
[inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
[feet] (maximum pumping distance)
aluminum
16. **Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] [rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that you field determine wetted diameter and operating pressure
at the reel and gun.
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart for each
travel lane and show the distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line. Irrigated acres are
determined by the travel lane.
** Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Field Data WoAsheet.
*** Information furnished by
—Z- 2v-- Nza�
Signature of owner or facility representative
and/or
Signature ofteclihical specialist
RM. E AYES and/or RONNIE G. KENNEDY, AL
f Printed name of owner or facility representative Printed name of technical specialist
Date �% r Z Date
R. M. MAYES

Irrigated Aa=gc Ddcmtination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) 51-34 Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system
New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # of Interior lanes # of Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull (1) .
# of Interior lanes # of Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull (2)
# of Interior lanes # of Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull (3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [ as a percentage of dia.]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple Single
Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted dia r ble and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (1) 1
fl© lumn
1 h h [feet] )/ 43,560
014 A In Table Column
travel lane length (1) (Sum: a + b + c)
(2) Interior or Exterior (lanethydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (2)
(Pull length X Wetted width
(a) Acres stop end of pull from Table
Total acres for travel lane length (2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (3) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (3)
(Pull length X Wetted width
(a) Acres stop end of pull from Table
Total acres for travel lane length (3) (Sum: a + b + c)
[feet])/ 43,560
Column
Column
[feet])/ 43,560
Column
V. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field
(a) Acres per travel lane length (1)
(b) Acres per travel lane length (2)
(c) Acres per travel lane length (3)
X # Lanes =
Acres
X # Lanes =
Acres
X # Lanes =
Acres
Total CAWMP wettable ac field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) 0.00 Acres
4' Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:

o 1 ° ,`, ` sue, .,•. '� ��fi '+. �
•�.._ � � �•.*_• ' \Y�.,�i" f+., vim""" i ��
ta
1 I' •'ti 11 Y' J �♦ }
t� f it �%• � ` 4 ' r, ! !�� ��•
Al
y
ti
�' �/ SSY, :' I��-y�v"`` "'y�.,..,,'.. '�'�,i f/"``L�+1 �1'1 "� •. �'�I�, s.��'i. , � •t`"'''��� 'r :•::r f
1 i`- _ � � � � 1 � •�i 1 : � � ,1 ;�' ' �-.�.-;'' � ram' '�:J r
rt..-",«. "
r L - { �� Yew . ' `,k � � h� 11 ♦``ti � �'" Y, ° �� � I
.1; ,�:'� ram.. � � JI� �.,�. �'♦ �`, •�w�

PRODUCER: ...... ............................... ............................ R.M. HAYES
LOCATION:...... .............................................................. 6920 DEVILS RACETRACK RD.
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
TELEPHONE:................................................................. [phone]
TYEP OF OPERATION: ................................................. FEEDER TO FINISH SWINE
NUMBER OF ANUV ALS:............................................... 5320 HOGS DESIGN CAPACITY
HARD HOSE TRAVELING GUN SYSTEM
(1)
MAKE AND MODEL # :.........................................
ABI IRRIGATION
(2)
HOSE LENGTH :....................................................
850'
(3)
HOSE INSIDE DIAMETER .......................
"
(4)
GUN MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER ..................
NELSON BIG GUN 100 SERIES
(5)
GUN RING NOZZLE SIZE ....................................
0.86"
(6)
GUN ARC ANGLE(S)............................................
1800 & 3300
(7)
GUN WETTED DIAMETER ..................................
275'
(8)
GUN PRESSURE ...................................................
70 PSI
FIELD (A)
LANE i
➢ SINGLE LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...........193'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.57 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................193'(.9 x 275)143,560 = 1.10 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.48 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.57 AC. + 1.10 AC. + 0.48 AC. = 2.15 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES ..................... Z I S AG
FIELD (B)
LANE 1
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......432'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................4322(275-112 + 220' 12)I 43,560 = 2.45 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.55 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 2.35 AC. + 0.55 AC. = 3.67AC.

LANE 2
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ....... 429'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ..........................................429' x 220' / 43,560 = 2.17 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. + 2.10 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 3.32 AC.
LANE 3
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......298'
➢ START -END AREA .................................... 0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ............................ .............. 254'(275' / 2 + 2207 / 2)/ 43,560 = 1.69 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.00 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 1.44 AC. + 0.00 AC. = 2.36 AC.
LANE 4
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......228'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.62 AC.
➢ MUDDLE AREA .......................................... 228'(275' / 2 + 178' /2)/ 43,560 = 1.19 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.62 AC. + 1.19 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.32 AC.
LANE 5
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH.....280'
➢ START -END AREA...................................0.62 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA.........................................280'(275' / 2 + 178' /2)/ 43,560 = 1.46 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA.................................0.62 AC. + 1.46 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.59 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................14.26 AG
FIELD (C)
LANE I
➢ SINGLE LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...........152'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.57 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................152'(.9 x 275')/ 43,560 = 0.86 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.48 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.57 AC. + 0.86 AC. + 0.48 AC. = 1.91 AC.

LANE 2
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......177'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.64 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................177'(275' / 2 + 200' / 2)/ 43,560 = 0.97 AC.
➢, STOP -END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.64 AC. + 0.97 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 2.13 AC.
LANE 3
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......283'
➢ START -END AREA .................................... 0.64 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA .......................................... 283'(275' / 2 + 200' / 2)/ 43,560 = 1.54 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.00 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.64 AC. + 1.54 AC. + 0.00 AC. = 2.18 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................6.22 AC
FIELD D
LANE 1
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......316'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.62 A.C.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................316'(275' / 2 + 182' / 2)/ 43,560 = 1.66 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.62 AC. + 1.66 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.79 AC.
LANE 2
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......270'
➢ START -END AREA....................................0.62 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA .......................................... 270'(275' / 2 + 182' / 2)/ 43,560 = 1.42 AC.
➢ STOP -END AREA.......................................0.51 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0,62 AC. + 1.42 AC. + 0.51 AC. = 2.55 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................5.34 AC

FIELD (E)
LANE 1
➢ SINGLE LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...........142'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.57 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA ............. ...... ......1................ 142'(.9 x 275')/ 43,560 = 0.81 A.C.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.48 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.57 AC. + 0.81 AC. + 0.48 AC. = 1.86 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................1.86 AC
FIELD (F)
LANE 1
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ...... 646'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................646'(275' 12 + 220' 12)/ 43,560 = 3.67 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.55 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.67 AC. + 3.67 AC. + 0.55 AC. = 4.89 AC.
LANE 2
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .......739'
➢ START END AREA ..... :.............................. 0.63 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................739' x 220 / 43,560 = 3.73 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. + 3.73 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 4.
LANE 3
INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .......726'
START END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
MIDDLE AREA ................................... ....... 726' x 220 / 43,560 = 3.63 AC
STOP END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
V4�
TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. +3.63 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 4.82 AC
LANE 4
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .......224'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................224, x 220 / 43,560 = 1.13 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 AC. + 1.13 AC. + 0.52 AC. = 2.28 AC.

I
LANE 5
➢ INTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH .......260'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.63 AC.
➢ mmDLE AREA .... ...................................... 260' x 220 / 43,560 = 1.31 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.52 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA..................................0.63 A.C. + 1.31 A.C. + 0.52 AC. = 2.46 AC.
LANE 6
➢ EXTERIOR LANE TRAVEL LENGTH ......148'
➢ START END AREA....................................0.67 AC.
➢ MIDDLE AREA..........................................148'(275' / 2 + 220' / 2)/ 43,560 = 0.84 AC.
➢ STOP END AREA.......................................0.55 AC.
➢ TOTAL LANE AREA ............ :..................... 0.67 AC. + 0.84 AC. + 0.55 A.C. = 2.06 AC.
TOTAL FIELD WETTABLE ACRES .....................24.23 AC
TOTAL WETTABLE ACRES
FIELD(A)......... ..... ............. ...:............................ 2.15 AC.
FIELD(B)...........................................................14.26 AC.
FIELD(C).......................................................... 6.22 AC.
FIELD (D).......................................................... 5.34 AC.
FIELD(E)........................................................... 1.86 AC.
FIELD(F)........................................................... 24.2_ 3_AC.
TOTAL ACRES..................................................54,06 AC.

.A.N'T r %L WASTE XAITAG `E.'"�24T PLAN CSRT1F1C.XT_-O:7 FOR HZW OR EiPAIMED FEEDLOTS
Please ratum the eaa:pleEad fox' to the Div-iaion ck Rnvirc=ental management at
the addxaaa on the raveran aids of thin form.
Name of farm (Please print)---
3resz : 6 Q3a arayic_s -�efrP .Qofc
_
- _ ,Ev,l.P- 065� N� _ cs� Phone No.:
oun ty :
C�
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude�/Z� f '(required) Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy,. etc.) : SW Al
.. -
Design capacity (number of animals): -r Ato_ ---
Average size of operation' (12 month population ayg.): s d
RECEIVED
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) : _37•S /fc._—WATER
QUALITY SECTION
Tech==cal specialist certification
SEP 9 1997
As a technical specialist 'designated' by the North Carolina Soil and water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new ot40n-D18chame P.A �
expaned animal waste management system as installed for'the farm named above
has as. animal waste management plan that meets the rdesign, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217-and
ISA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criterwa-have�een verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for'lagoonz or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; :adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application'rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stor=water,runoff events less severe than the 25--year, 24-hour
storm.
Hama of Technical Spacialiat (Please Print) Eit�'d�T/`1� G • l/D�/r
Affiliation: t9YSrPrGT Go�✓s�v�:iu�Jr, W.5•cr�Su� aF:v�y SEf'�/icC
"adress (Agency) Phone No._9�9-9�1
5xgnatL:re C� _�? Date:
===============asaasacs_aaaas:::arat�sosaaraass:o�ncaaaaicraaarssasoap=as
Owaer/yasager Agreemaat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. .I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Enviro=ental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man -wade conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-yeas, 24-hour storm_ The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District. �L
Nara o: Land Owanr (Please Print) : /Q• 1-*7•
Signature: /// _ _ Date: l -�,�J y�
Nama of manages, if different from• owner (Please print) :_.L�
Signature: Date:
11!2t:e= :Y change in Yanc�'ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environ_nental Management yrithin 60 days of a title transfer.
�aD(,1 DEd USE ONL'I:ACNEW##
s TJ

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name--: �av �g 1L5 'j•= County; 0
Mail Address-:na e 1 � s! 3o�tl�/9 _ Fouv oaks 1VC_
Type of production unit ----: 5w i a e -Fecdt_ To /o,Noas
Type of waste facility-----:
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the`waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
rreeds of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize -the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
S3�.c7 animals x 9 tons waste/animal/yr= fp'Ftcns
to al waste

Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
H3,10 animals x lbs. N/animal/year =Aole
lbs./yr
N
Applying the above'amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for ISO days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Sail Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Per Ac. Used Apply
=�M
ma
W�NRKNXMWII
MIE�Mmv
MAIN
mmmm
M1
MmMIE
'=�
MIN
I=
M'.
MEN
M
MAIN
M-EIIE
Total 3 . s3 32-
Available Nitrogen
Surplus Or Deficit r
L Ae-Pic i'� oT
). ilroc P1
Cr117'
Call the Sail and Dater Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared by: W. % S GT S-gg
v Name Title !Date
Concurred in by:
Producer Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

Sample Letter to be -Used for Land Owned by Someone Other Than Producer
er
have agreed
to allow
Landowner
SCIO
fl9l
1�Ott
to apply animal waste on
the following
Livestock P oducer 5S- 3
V" P-044�5S
a
fields on
tract(s)
number(s) 7`�3ri
Field #
0'e 57La
(ASCS
Crop
Acres
Field #
(ASCS #)
Crop
Acres
Field #
(ASCS #)
Crop
Acres
Field #
(ASCS}
Crop
Acres
I understand
this permission is granted for a minimum of 20 years.
ks,6zz tzz��
an owner " V Date (i

I—v
Ve-
'k�'�
436L
Pi
IA
M';r

tv,
YN
4f"­
41
�A

i.AGOON SUhf L%RY SkIL•LT S TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
ittled top of dam:— � L'I7
Tap Width
` ID
Construct top of dvo1
CJSa
7
Fill Yardage: _3.'�.6G - AL}
91.1
c
2 -J
---Natural -ground el ev.
_
__-------- ----- - ---_- -----------
---
cut off seal
---�—� Depth determi nd b
Dc?pend5 an l:(. nipIl ant SCS C311 .4i tc. dvl
Start land application Stop sand applic:�tian
elev.
E
--_-'1'emE�arary V---- - /
Etent
support— Treatment Volume
� 4ia
Z•5 Trap of sludge elov.
------------------------------------
Bottom elev. _38-0
Lagoon size: Length _5�m R(OnS Width Cu.Yds. e:;ccvated
BENCH MAFOt, DLSCFc I F' 1'' I ON : �— '-L 1 �') - °- s-� ^p„ _1�x2a1. r Q W4`
irk •�� p�,clC�IrT /1QVS� - -
Ei evert i oil: .S/.,g 6
GENERAL INFORNATIGN
JOB CLASS:
HAZARD CLASS:
ANIMAL TYPE & NUMBER: 53AZ �ez�
KIND OF OPERATION:_ fQTs —
NOTE: If construction is not
started within ant: year, this
plan is not valid unL•il re-
Lv,%lu;.Ati011 of flood plain for
safety hazard is; m;-.tde.
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL WASTE
(SINGLE STAGE)
a FARM
COUNTY
4e, Caro f ffi,. _-- STATE
U. S. DEPARTNErNT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
DESIGNED DY: fang EiJa.1
FtiPPROVED BY:
DATE: --6

perator:R. M. HAYES County: JOHNSTON
i s-L _.ice to nearest resi dense (other than owner) :
STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
Date: 05/06/9-
1500.0 feet
0
sows
(farrow to
finish)
1417
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to
feeder)
.. 52C
lbs.
- 0
lbs
5320
head
(finishing
only)
x 1?5
lbs.
718200
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to
wean)
x 433'
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x 30
lbs.
- 0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 71B200 lbs
MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 718200 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/Ib. SSLW
Volume = 718200 cubic feet
STOPPAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION r
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet /9."de4&ao, �K�l-d y`e--
TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME ae "
Inside top length 475.0 feet ; Inside top width 275.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 49.7 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 2.5 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 4e. 7 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 38. 2 f e e t
Seasonal high water table elevation 42.2 feet
Total design volume Lisirg prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/ENDw SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 C.5 22.5 470.0 270.0 10.5
AREA OF TOP'
LENGTH * WIDTH
470.0 270.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
417.5 C17.5
126900.0 ( AREA OF TOP')
90806 . ( AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
447,. e 124 . e 43C6c6. = ( AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4 )
CU. FT. = CAREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM? } DEPTH/6
126900.0 4.77- 56. _ 90806.3 1.8
-1OLUME OF Li-+40ON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIGNUID LEVEL = 113e1T4 CU. FT.

TEMPORARY S T ORAS E RCMU T nED
DRA i NAIG'E AREA
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length � 'Width
475.0 275.0 130625.0 square feet
Pu2lding= (roof and lot water)
Length Width =
0. 0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 12:0625. 0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 18Oi days.
A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.001L6
Volume = 718200 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Daay 180 days
VolUme = 175389 cubic feet
H. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Vol ume = 0.0 gallons/day
Vol ume = 0.0 cubic feet
180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
L. VOI L UTae of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall - 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 76197.4 cubic feet

Volume of Ec year T- 24 hour storm
Vol ume = 6. B inches : 12� inches per foot + DA
Volume = 74020.8 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 175-_y89 cubic -feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 76198 cubic feet
5D. 74021 cubic feet
TOTAL 3E5607 cubic feet
SUMMARY
Total required volume 1.0477.807 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. IIt81-34 cubic feet _
Min. req . treatment voI ume plus sludge accumulation 71 B200 cubic feet
At elev. 45.7. feet ; Volume is 7 77_ -3 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-'4hr storm is 1064114 cubic feet
At elev. 48.1 feet ; Volume is 1062659 cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation 42.2 feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: S-4 ls3 DATE: S-( -9 3
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN

- - --- - - -- - - - s
.a
- - - ( ICLor e--f
c �c
--CdW--...,. -
SET
✓l . ._ . APS+_-335_ tic ------- ZS: i _ ---- vZ ._. �5) o s��s- ..... ... . -
Vt = lo�.SZsj(34s�+- ��`TZ•5��3�z•s)t4{z.i8.7s){3�8.7s� ---- -.-- _- --.._ .
6
C`367'1S � G$Q3!•2S t- 322GSG-2S�
C2-5f2r t z(ra�.s-F4,44,
--
.2 5' Xf° 'r$-Y'

U. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner ,� ct.c, �� County , j Ar'g
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam, 1 L _Ft. Length of Flood Pool 4-7 5- Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 4-8-C
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor.effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev.-Est.
Elevation
.
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length: Width:
Slope:
Land Use
Improvements
: Above :Floodwater Above
: Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft.
%
Ft.
Ft.
2
SOd
' 1O0�r
J.C)
CllO�ds
'
3 :3L�.$v
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach Lrs
aMaw -� , i _� �- _ram b
A &'M26
r
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) c?
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V) _:
11-MO;_M OW
n
U. 6- T
title-)
r
Concurred By
VD, �j ") M. I 0,--An A
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date l=�l—

' STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RALEIGH, N. C.
635f NNE 745
742 207d3 (FOUR OAKS NE)
17' 300

SC S- I N G- 538
Rr.. 5-70
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME + DISTRICT-ailn� -- —
DATE 4-- 8— 2'3 _ _ _ COUNTY—
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT
WATERSIIEL) AREA MEASUREMENTS
c.as1
CROPLAND -ACRES PASTURE -ACRES
WOODLAND ACRES TO'CAL ACRES FOND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIU.�IST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE NtA.DE (Approx. scale 1"=feet)
Ltxarw relr•.ncr a"rnr .n cenier Lne of dam and edwnrify an ikeecA.
I
I
a
i
! I I�
I
I
!
LL
� i� I� ►�
I
I I
T
i
I
I I
i
-
I
—�
I
I
r
1
i
SHOW
DEPTH
S CAL E
Eii)RING NU.NWER AND PROFILE
.4faA♦ an./ Ltf dam -rife and sodfway bonnas fr,u . mh pond—1 a,ra anv b.r,rnw pit bannys • Arpa,afr wrsh wrncal nnl fmr.
!C'unrrnwiJ on Gsrt when necu Aar'el 5h�u wa:e, la Ole rfrwnuns on dam srre bunnys.
l I e 9 10 1111 12 �^ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
` S
5C,
Mi
II)
.5
1
boo
5
f
/l
!9
132
.,
Via, S
�
7
F
-z
ILJ
If
_
80RlN(;.S MlAIJE IiY- SIGNATURE Ac TITLF. ��

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.
Cut-off Trench:
---------------
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
-------------
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfili shall not be placed
in standing water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the Construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered,they will neeE tZ5
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a suitable material ie-- L, , H). Refer to the soils
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation, A S- .i,c.'ar6c ,�jf�;. ' 4S r-eyWj,V-CL ,
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas Shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as.soon as possible after
construction.

0 P E = A T r Cf`: A N 0 MA 1 NTEINANC= PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions, fIushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Lana application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to .be carried out -
I. It is strongly recommended. that the treatment lagoon be.pre-
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment H)
before land application-.
3. Hegin pump --out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion - ( __as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation. 4.f 3 or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) ,
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (l) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
B. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SEED114G RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: Z,Q ACRES (C14)
USE THE SEED- MIXTURE INDICATED: dccor*L+i+f -fv pia „Y S2 EY1
12.0 LSS. FESCUE GRASS C 60 LBS. /ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
�Zxl LBS. *PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS 0 60 LBS./ACRE z
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
I& LBS. HULLED bERMUDA GRASS e B LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
�0 LBS. RYE GRAIN C 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
F 0 LBS. RYE GRASS C 40 LSS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMbER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
-------------------------------------------------
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
e2 n>* LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LSS. /ACRE)
TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
oZQ° BALES OF srfALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
FALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA SAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT B
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL LAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
As /40e o l m , //a 74. 70 6 t a c/a/{ cY 0�

l�aal C-xc._ f5,17 G0. 14
67 / sG J lY `j 3
f c l a r1�
J2
jZS3 _ E,� Q"a n�lfiy 30rr w [Fo,- Pad arArvo44 rn-.�
�ro+v� d.ol�d��" olredl

� -.. SCS-CPA-026
ail Cc,is�rvice (June91)
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND
;''CONSERVATION DETERMINATION
1. Name and Addre s of Person
2. Date of Request
�.. 3. County.
n.S+
Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination f• a• rarm rvo, ano tract ry s
SECTION I -'HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND
is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determi tion? -. Yes [� No ❑
i FIELD NO.(s) ' -
TOTAL ACRES
Are there highly erodible soil map units on this farm? '.Yes No ❑
..
List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any .
crop year during 1981-1985.
I. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981-1985; and w re not �
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
, �^�y
- �11i , .
`•?JO�
��; r • '• . �_ _ :�-;'
l0. This Highiy Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office El Field
.
FIELDNO.(s).-..
.,TOTAL ACRES
11, Are there hydric soils on this farm? Yes ❑ No ❑
12. Wetlands (W , includin abandoned wetlands liar Farmed Wetlands, (FWj or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
1 9 ' +
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditfons. Famied Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be;
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to Decemb_ er 23, 1985, as long as they are. not r '
abandoned.
13. Prior Convened Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23. 1965. The use;.management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted crbpland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions unless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). - Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions:
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MM. These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made. t
•ti :`
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a'person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or awetland
converted between December 23,1985 and November 28, 1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after ._
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
18. Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23, 1985 and.,
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production; .
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been'restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23. 1985 and prior to November 28,1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA.
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields _ - are considered
maintenance and are in comoliance
with FSA.
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance andif
_ installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW). See i m 22 for information on CW+yea '
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office field rRlnd was delivered maiiedprfo the person on r
28. Remarks. �t � � `-�
29. I terrify that the above determination is correct and adequate for use in determining 30. Signature of SCS District Conservationist {31. Date
eligibility far USDA program benefiis, and that Overland hydrology, hydric soils, and r
hydrophyric vegetation under normal circumstances exist on all areas outlined as /�lF. Jj
Wetlands Farmed Werlands. and Farmed Wetlands Pasture. �l
Assistance and programs of the Sol) Conservation Service available wkhout regard to race, religion, color, sex, age,br handicap.
SCS Copy

E
■
E

.. uonservation Service
SCS-CPA-026 1. Name and Address of Person 2. Date of
Request
"0 )
(June 91) f \h r EMI - l P 1
3. County
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND t(} d,ltz�4
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION
4. Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determinate n T5, Farm No. and Tract No.
SF . ItIN I _ HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determ' tion? Yes No El
FIELD NO.(sj -
TOTAL ACRES
*Il
7. Are there highly erodible soil ma unfits on this farm? Yes No:mFi
g P ❑
t• „
8. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop year during 1981 -1985.
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose ire any crop year during 1981-1985- and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
10. This Hiohly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office ❑ Feld ❑
4 AM4 M I
MA
SECTION 11- WETLAND
:.
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11: Are there hydric soils on this farm? Yes"No ❑
Q MOW
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be,
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23, 1985, as long as they are not
abandoned.
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23,1985. The use, management,'
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions unless
-
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment..
14. Artificial Wetlands (AM., Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be farmed according to. the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determinafeon was made. 4• r.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (M1W). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
IS. Restoration without Violation (RSW), A restored wetland converted between Decembef 23, 1985 and . '
_
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
M. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
,; �• ;
wetfand has been restored.
H. Converted Wetlands (CM. Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28, 1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
'7_ Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands convened after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA
L., kY$�
program benefits until this wetland is restored. =
Q
'LJ O�c�
'.d' . Converted Wetland Nan -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,,. 't:
.
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
A. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination . =-
, .
SCS..
_by
S_ The nlanned attaratinn measirrae nn watlanet in futile are considered
maintenance and are in compliance
4
with FSA. `f
.6. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields -„ _ are not considered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CM. See' em 22 for information on CW+year_ -
7. The wetland determination was completed in the office field op4nd was delivered❑ mailed o the person on
2. Remarks. ;s^:
• -. •• V L�� .,fir-t'• f• :.
S. 1 certify that the above determination is correct and adequare for use in derermining 30. Signature of SCS District Conservationist : 31. Date :.. =
eligihifiry for USDA program bents. and that wetland hydrology, hydric sails, and��
hydrophytic vegetation under normal circumstances exist on all areas outlined as t:�0 ('>�
Wetlands, Formed Wetlands. and Farmed Werlands Pasture. 1
Lssistence and programs of the Soil Conservation Seller available without regard to race, religion, color, sax, age; oA►landlcap. ; .. .
SCS Copy \\

.. "it., ..
I
, --1
i�ul

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919- 571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-989_5050
SWCD 919- 989-5381
NRCS 919- 989-5381
This plan will'be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface graters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all emplovees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
?. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm tc increase elevaticn of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields an an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all flows to _he lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
E. Make sure no surface water is entering lagccn.
S: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary di ersion to contain waste.
41 C. incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and elimi Cape the reason(s) tap
caused the runoff
e. Evaluate the application rates _fcr the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-acticn
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. close valves to alim_naze furzher discharge.

r
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
h. Stop irrigation pump..
C. ?Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all Flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditc:^ to catch all seepage,
out in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by ^L'r= :'rung animals, trap
or remove animals and fill Holes and o.^.:apact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the c.cmdit-on of
the side *Hays and lagoon :c moil as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a.
Did the waste reach an_v surface Haters?
b.
approximately how much was released and fcr what
duration?
C.
any damage noted, such as employee _.jury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the prcperoy
e.
Does the spill have the cctenzia_ on _each surface
waters?
_.
Could a future rain event _ause The spILI to reac:?
surface waters?
J
Are potable water wells in manger 'elzher an or of
of the property) ?
f1.
How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. Du; _nc ncrma_ business hcurs, _ail your : q
(Division of 'Hater Qua---_ . regLznal i tee, _ _.cne
919- - after ^curs, emergency 'L:::iber: -_-
r 33-3942. Your phone call shcull include: vcu
name, facility, teLephcne ::umter. , t'e derails of

If
the incident froth item 3 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, Breather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under tauten,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface -graters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-989- 5050.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989-5380, local SWCD
office phone number 919-989-5381, and local MRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of vour choice to begin recair
of problem to minimize off -site damage. y
a. Contractors Name: i/7G
b . Contractors Address: �{ q f�,'c /�/�hs K�� ,pe/,
C. Contractors Phone: 2,(y3 -_vlPI
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting engineer, etc.)
a. Name: Chris smitb
b. ?phone: [phone] -
is Implement procedures as advised by DWO and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the .caste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
_+suq o ne a n. w a ra i ern C ec: ale n, qq=

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Snorrc Cause II1M's to coutrnl Insects Site Specific. I'l-ariiccs
1-ititild Systems
Flnsli (=anus • Accurtullatiou of solids Flush system is dcsigncd and opcnued — w
Sufikkillly to relllnve ;lUtIllillIZI I solids from
grains as designed.
n Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
disc.barge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids Maintaill lagoons, settling basins and pits tivbeie
pest breeding is apparcul to Minimize the
crusting of Solids to a depth of no more than C -
H inclics over More thsul 30%of surface,
l-'XCCSsive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation w1viaillhill vegetative control along hanks of
l irutivtlr lagoons and other impourldmcrlls Io lircverll
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along; water's edge on impolmdmelli's petioieter.
Dry Systems
Deed Spillage Design, operate and maintain fiscal systems
bankers and Irolighs) to minimize Ilse
accumol;llion of decaying wastage.
n Clean up spillage on a Iotlline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day inlerval during summer; 15-30 day interval
_ luring winter).-----------
Prerl Srorsq,c --- AClnt11rl1,1110n5 of feed residues Ff Itednce uioislrrrc accilnntlalion wilhin and
around irnmedialt; Ifrr iurater of fi ed Am al;e
areas by iusur inp; +11s1iu:rgc away fionr situ
an(Vor providing adequale comainmcul
covered bin 101- bretiver's grain arrd similar high
moisture graill producls).
rl rasped for stud remove or bre;rk 1111 au-11uudaled
Sa1idS in titter strips amund I- r'rl storal,e a!s
needed.
AAIW - t`fovcruber' I I, 1990, Page I

Source Cuuse
1ii14hs to Conlrol Inscels — - - - Site Specific l!'r;rctices --
----
Animal I loldnlg Arcas Accumnlalions of animal wastes
fJ
— --- - - -^ —�_
Eliminate low areas That trap moisture alonli
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by annuals is
minimal.
f 7
Malnlaill fence rows and filler slrtfls 111Ylm►d
an real holding areas to minimize
accummlations of wastes (i.e., inspect for alyd
remove or break up occumulaled solids as
needed).
Dly Alimme I laudling • ACCLIVIMIali0115 of animal wastes
n
_
Remove spillage out a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
SyStenlS
day interval during summer; I5-30 day iulerval
during winter) where nlanure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
n
Provide for adequale drainage arOlRld II1i11111re
stockpiles.
n
inspect tier amf remove or break tip accunnllaled
wastes in filler ships around stockpiles and
nlntime handling areas as needed.
For mare ird'011 ation conlact the Cooperative Extension Service, Dq artment of I:womology, Box 7013, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
m
- AAIIt: November, I I, II 6, Page 2

--Auiul:ll hwl}' :;nrFu:es
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
--- Cinlsc 11Ml`s Ili Mininlize (}41111• Sill:
";wine protluclimi ----- F1 Vegelillive or wooded buffers; ---
fl Itecoulmendcd best luanilgcolenl practices"
WIG omI judgill to and Common Sense
• Dilly velbly Ilnnrs
• wet 1u11nllrs-t:ovcrell floors Stalled Moors;
M- walcrers located over stoked Ilnnrs;
f] Feeders at high Curl of solid floors;
C7 Scrape ulanure buildup linlll floors;
fl llualciflnnrventilation For ill ying
---
Hamlie Ct11E,:0i4111 lilt:. - -
�111lite-,
! icllucnl manure n:nlnval by hush, pit recharUt:,
•
I1'dlllill MiCrohlill tICL'n1111)[1S111t11!
or Sentpe.,
Cl
Ilnderllnnr vl:nlilatinn
17�:nlil.11iuu �:,ll,ul•,t l,Iru "•---��VuLoilcl;asta;
----
—a
'
lol�lilr:nslut:,:; ----------------------------------
Iu
11tISl
��inl
A I: 1cleill air. movCnlCnE
0"
Waslulnwn Ilclwecn groups of animals;-
f)
I -ed addilivus;
fl
Feeder covers;
1-1
I'CCII tlt:IIVCI'y dUwnSllllllt CAICMICr5 Ill IectlCl-
Covers
Aglialiun ofrecycled lagoon
Fl
Flush lank covets;
liquid while: Bulks arc filling
f_7
latcild till lines to ucar bolunu of links wilh
_
anti -siphon vents_
E Itnit .1II.:)'
•—1lgilidlon tiro inn wasictvalcr
n
I Intleillnnr !lush wills uudclMull- VC11flialinn
t:unvcyiulce
vii 1,:%'lj.11I!(: O1 Illt:.
---Agitalion oft :cycled lilgnon
f7
I:XIcn,l ret l arl;t: NINCS Its n�: n �nl1l1lnl „I pits
Iitlnitl while flits art: 1-1116ll;
Willi anti -siphon vcnls
lei :L1ll,u1
—Agilalion dmil11? Snmp Will,
17
5111111► limk ctivclS--� -`- —
111ling anti ill ilmlown
OL114iL11: dl;llrl C111IL( litill
• � A1yllafinn 41111111g Wi1SIC4VM0i'
f 1
11ox covel-s -�� -- '--- —
Ill 11111,a tt111 11uA e]
C0II Veyi111CC
is l'racliecs
um
Al I )C - H4ivcmlwi 11. 10411, lagc a

Situ, Cnusc 111411's In Mininlice (lllul. Me Sped0c Praclires
:;t,lniii,lt; +v,,l,a ,Iki,llu,l - Inlploper Ilraillagc; ----- — Ciralll antl lanllsc,ylk such lllal water Ihaios-T--_-- --
l.u.11lllc . Klicrllllial /iccanlposiliall of away fitful fac:ililies
al'gallic Illallel,
I+Idlukkc Ilak:l,�,i ulltn • l'Ilillly Illailllalll(NI access rl)a(lS flarlll access (Mild nlailllellance
IJnl,li� luaih liuln f;urll
,kcJ:css
Adilkllallal lnlJJknlall,Yit :
53viac M;uullc Al;ulat;culcal ; 0200 Itltle/lINll' Ilatlel — -
Stvine Pi4itItwli,nk I-;unl IAdcod 611lllar Sum cows to"d Remedks ; Ii11AE 100 Mwo l
,ikvulL: I'k,Y,lu<:uun Fac:ilily Klaa a Mauaguno at: Pk llccllarl;c - I-gwni Twauncnl ; IMAH 12M
sivinc I'rwluclian kl6liry Planuru Manal;cwent: UullerRnar Fillsll - l.agowt lhallnenl ; 1:13AH 12948
I-;,t;uall Ocsit,n alul NIIIIIat;uucnl fur 1-ivustack Manure "treatment and Storage; Ii13Al: 1f13 63
I':,Idu;kti�Yu uC Alnkkulc ;Jail WaJ itnvalcr Applicaliun I.(IIIIIlnlallt ; [-.HAI-. I'acl SIIcu1
('uutrullikig ( l,li,rs Craul S+virJc IIuilllivgs ; PI11-33
I-.uvir,inukemal Asiur,ulcc Ilitigrmik ; NI111C Manual
I Iplau hu Klanagi, I lilor ; a iyun ham IIYI: Swinc OW Task Force:
lulu;ulCc l',„1t;,:llu iu Alliluul Mivalrc Millid;cille l: n,lal3 Mod Flies ; I'ltill01, 199S Canfcrcucc 111,4ceellil►p
A l P IC 11.,vt 111k J 1 1. 1'f',t�, I',kl;,.
Avaiial►le Flala :
NCMI, Cibilllly I.xicllslall Cellicl
NCSI1 - IIAF
NCMI - IlAI:
NCSI1 - BA
NCsll - nAli
NCS11 - IIAF
NCMI - SwO I:>;leusion
NC Pmk I'rukl wum Assoc
NCM1 Atari Camuutlliruians
FI(flilla Cuaperalive ItKIC116ull

I.sill l,fill ainllijw� ;il
Ll g; uw Y
I .ilgY ll 111 :.11l I.H't:]
lrlig oliun !,plloll. lcl
lwzdc�.
51wag;c t.uil: nl Iruin
,ill lilt _I;
.`;clllllil; II.I'• II �,itr 1dt't
Al.uunt:, dull nr :fIItlg;I
�guc.nit:, uutlt:l;
Eln�rn�tatal nl.lnulc,
ml Irclll
Sill rut:C:s
I1C.lt1 :llliltl.rl
1)CAd .tulut.il
Itrt.ilUa.tl<q•+
Curse
• Ag ili dmi thlting waslewaler
- -- C„IYVL'yiklYfr:
---_ IIMPs In INinlluiYc nda+_-- —.—��Slle Specific I'r,lcflccs
f1 lixlclkd discharge Iloilo of pines underncalh
la ' loll Ii 113id Icvci
• viwilllc gas ellrlsslans;
II -I! Proper I lgiriml Ilcllticl cilpaclly;
• Iliolog;ical Mixing;
1,`—i ct)lrccl lagonik Sllltlup praccllures;
• A g;llallnrl
L
IL,-161inill um Sllrfacv area-It)-whoolle 1-mia;
isi Minialukn agilation when.huulpillg;
fl Mcclianical aeration;
fl I'fovcu biological additives
--- I lig;h pressure agitalinn; W
IllGl1t: on Illy drys with lilllc or no wind;
• W711d drill
W Miniolunl recnlnnlcrultA npel-wilts pressure;
I'uulp inlilke near lagoon li(lni+! surface;
L7 I'unlp linty second -stake lagoon
• I';Illi;rl luicrultlal dcca,npasilir+ll;
f7 IlnEta,n nr midlevel loading;;
• klixilll; whip: lillil►g;;
17 'fi,nl: CnVUS;
• Ag;ilalinn WhC11 t1111)lying;
fl Ilasin surface nwis of solids;
f 1 haven hiol(igical wlilidvci; nr Ilxichills
I'auiul uli.:,c<hial tlacnnkposilinn;
fl I?xtcud clrainpipc unYlt:ks nndcrucalh liquid
• t+lixing; while filling;;
level;
• Ag;itatiall when cmIiiyiag
l7 Itcml,vc willed snlirls reg;libilly
• Ag;ilulinn when spicading;
n Sail illjcctiarl of slurry/sludg;cs; -
• Vnlulile gas cnlissinns
fl Wash residual uk:,rlurc 60111 sprca(ICr alicr Ilse;
Ilse -
ll 1'rnv�,Y hlt,ing;lrall achIllivts err axld;uils
• Vnliltilc g As cullssiuus wIlllts
--
r-1 Snll Illj, ralnlY r,l slug l)+/slncll;cs -
illyl,ll;
n Soil iticorpormion +vithin'18 Ills.;
fl SI,rr:ad ill Il,iu unilinln I:lycrs lilt rapid Ilr)'ing;;
fl '' oven hiolilg;ical addilives m, nsidaills
Carcass dec„urpasimill
Ili P1011cr dispnsilinu c,l r.:uc:rsscs
• ('arr.ass tlt:c:nu,pnsitil,n
f7 (.aniplctc cnvtr,illg; of calL:kssta ill [)Ill i:ll Airs•
- -�---lncunlplcic r.uuYIlu;llnll---
AKH It: I lOIvrullict 11, 1')96, I;wt; 4
f7 I'rnper lnc�lliu,Y/cnuslruckinn n! disposal Ails
f I Sccouclary stooge hurlkcrs Y

4
Nlortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
_! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within Z- hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water_
Rendering at arendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-I68.7
n Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in' a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value witi:out endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veteninarian trust be
attached)
u? 7W- ids

y WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name--: Rdl Me fit. �t � _��County: 0
Mai 1 Acdress--: X,3 v O
Type of production unit----: S ipe - Feede- To l as &ck S_
Type of waste facility ----- : 194ue-;-e h; c Lf4nn _].,,- T PDynu)
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
ccmmercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Scil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding -'at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated sails or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize -the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based an typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
533.c� animals x 1,9 tons waste/animal/yr= /QJOrFtons
to�'a1 waste

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 6
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2'. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used'the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface .is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management. system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate.
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 8
NAME OF FARM: R.M.HAYES
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: R. M. HAYES - 5 e e- o ic/ 14 f}a e a d A14,
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please prin
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Chris W. Smith
AFFILIATION: NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
SIGNATURE: DATE:

'��sy• _ '■`4-�,�-7F' tom- -'-Y�' •F 'r•�r- - - T. :•-�.•,,.e rf. _.
t'T�•`�"".�: ti�^ �R•rs, +f-n `r••'�,"�„�• �w,:� � �r J y if ^ I.�r '•s 4'�� •:' ^•,4:'r +. y., rrs : 1 fc:�i i�,f'.yam: ,+•�:� r�nr :v '�a•.. ,.
>•'r� `.Mh••'.`�a. ��'��'+a"b^7��"'f��}t!!.F�r+;';.y 1'�"rrllea„=.�•�'�""f''' , � •� .J � r.; ' fh•!•-'+��', ;'
I ,4•r ;w � .� �`�. w.e�, ^a,'!�a#►Jf4'i.�',. ��'N��• .' �F'•��� S1 �` �L ��u +f,f vr`,.. `.
- ;', �`.. •^ 4' ti.•., J-.K... tr.■! ^ s��1 .. 7Y. ;'t '+ tr .�. w. .•v... ?i'E�{
w• a r■ .-..,, i\l, Y. } y�Q�yr�'. r rjs�.„, ye�.�"^'ri Ms.'. Jr.1~rr1 �� �� � �- r� ��-••,
_ �'•, V- _ v,T ; •`ir ll11l Li Y lt_Y�-[ r!y���^�;�'[��.���'+► rx aq�`?��+' �jF�`• j Y �'Y'=' `r 4 ,.♦+r.
\'`,. =\r- Jr `� a�4�y I 'rT '�.�',��, •■�I' �`��1.�rr�9r`'�C'_Y". _'i ;.• •�i'��, iYP'�r�` � .l
r t ,� �� ..r 4 tisJ.!� r. �'f �'• aF��kT.',. ,,..�4"+h r.,�s{: !'� ��;.-�•'a jr�h`'��Yr. ■ :!{tr !� r��
!,rJ ... •w w f -r• � k.a{ij,..,, FI�Y' S ' r tj I j^ +•. v�+; +•� • 4 � •w �•. � r•, .0 1 .
♦j" a- �� � � ! °',�� ' �...:� r r } 1 q" •:'.� r f��v7►",..i�+• r�T41L rt - - '�►"'F t J�. 4•y � ,�L.1�i
` f� r+., s Y¢ r ,�- �'•1i.� 7 r ., L � r J`. - '•�,_`'+.�.i+ -. J '�� �.y.-rr.��,• �•f' 4 * ( `,-na �n`�1r� ti„�� ,h ••�+M�
t x a 4 % ,r ; r.,1 �' ' r "tira.+ - - ,� ' r..`: .+ yiy:,,L�'�, `rT �'i y'=1' ■r '`% `� w�,� a 's l
rr^ r�^�� '� `'"�*r�'r'f`%y���� i`��'s}.;�fr in _•,ty T„y �,�''fr
Ole
,y w. �t� a,�r n T �a !s•y a :ti-_wr �.+♦L,. ;�F �„} sJ '`�a eA �•'! r
Y$ ` `F'' ; �!` ► �' �"` .- 3.'r �� ems- �Y "`^ ;r'as ;`,,'Lq'+- li' . f; r�r'l. r iF f (:• I, _ j.i , 4T;
� •4, K `�rft� r r !X- -�')a t,,� i �-v�r;'.-,3i�,.�rJ�r''-fJ.•iw��y� �, rf' .% s ."'■�•�"�jl e� �.i ji � '�F
v tn� rYi+r r ... -s, ': _�. ',ate''•'-'•'i!f' af1f ` � .-'�ir iS 'fa`tif.���j �.a Lt rat; - .
h 4 z'i y`E .r: '..•f• 9 .rr_. Yam': v ��^ rr;�rtii•R �• r�� �bt r dFO,'. �;�� � v�� �i � � „r � �,5� ; .�j)
r+�c �'A ,.�^f:.§, _ I. r n "� >4 r�..,y� �t:'�- �"ae 'y i w`': ^M,�-,1� �xyJ•,'� .��-r ."...: �.` � L�; : '�r:4 i 'r'r :..N !
h'• t .. "c r+ � tit �� '�}�� � "' j`� 93� � � h .��r,l.�-�-.s•1c,, `Yr .� r
I t, � x � �r w ;.ryi`.l "r r i ,'.` i �r a 1r{ � y .h,•�,,, ti.,. Y;i• �''
t4 . 3 r { .�..,''•+" r s ,tS .r a ' i s� , Y 7F � ,, i y r
''�_ of t .!`4• L� w _ ;�, ' k ' ,!.'�.y�i r_ � e� • j,F ti'"•i t. tsp rYs ,� r*V , f�M - _ .. i r�
e� �_ - F-f"■'y r�J y ti -'{+ � .a+�t"I �� r��:,i«�;�+�`�yLi'.� .'�_ � �- ..r
� - „�:r y-,� : ui � �' .,r r.•r. "A rr _.. i s r s •": .4 -, ''
t +- 'sl■■ i -Yt 'Tw �` ♦ � ��rC,i., �. :' RJj„ �.•Y.rt�a �r
.? if s= - �r 4 � rt�r• + .r (yY • !AlC'.: +� .�;�.'c" `, �• •,,1�' � t+r' •,' ',��Y i r �-
_
•{ . M � z 11: tl t� 14;E r�r., r � ;'�,�`',�,�._. s��e } ; �;:,F�'h •'�.�-� ��,� •+. y - J � + • .
<::.° r ) tv •r k i � - n• j ati tf ',i�' r� i '' + r.� � xa.
Mr ai,R' ♦.}� �i� r r��r. �r-
rtT{ ,��.�f, ��jY' •��'•�'.?i��,tr��.e� r� - � F - .�%��� e�, i���� ��ti%iy(f:, �r
Tj
:, e•. it :%. 6 ��, �•"_a}r• i"t;`..3 '. J'� e^
/ � .^' ' "' __,�ia4� - ' '` t. �7.. err �✓-�f•� Jf',. b„ "p S ■--
! 3- �� r .ice �T`-•'�.' .�ra �a �?�•/, '^� 5/- �..
� � y :.1d, ��, r •,+ fa.;- .R •,ti;,�e: y� = s . r . f' i y..
r. xYYw. Mj ijrj r r �,-■ ,, 7"„ .■r l;r

=OPP
i -T 77r7
wMf,;
"
--As
Y.
-Y Su ';I'
A
AMA T
. . . . . . . . . . . .
tip W"S
fw
--4AM110lif IV- -1 d ti-A

(W"!
United States Soilii Department of Conservation /
Agriculture Service
806 North Street
Smithfield, NC
May 21, 1993
As'discussed with Raymond M. Hayes, he has pumping
rights on property ASCS tract #1188. All the other property,
he or his mother, Hazel S. Hayes own. He, as well as his
mother, were told of need to file an AD-1026 for clearing
land for additional coastal bermudagrass.
It was also discussed that he needed to remain a
distance of 100 feet from perennial stream with waste
application. According to topo map, Quadrangle Newton Grove,
North, North Carolina, this would be small branch that
feeds pond on property. This area has been cleared. He was
also encouraged to get something in writing from his uncle,
J.C.Hayes, but he has only been able to get an oral
agreement to cross his property with irrigation equipment at
this time. This would involve crossing an intermittent
stream according to topo map, Quadrangle Newton Grove,
North, North Carolina. By not having written agreement, this
could jeopardize operation in the future. Mr. Hayes would
not have adequate land on which to pump if he were cut off.
I confirm this information was discussed with me.
R. M. Hayes
t2lr M
Date
Q5The Soil Conservation Service
A an agency of the
DeOartment of Agriculture

'Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
5 o animals x ib=_. N/animal/year = .6 lbs./yr
Aa b 1 e N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big ,job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste' in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for le0 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Fer Ac. Used Apply
�.
i!�Ae'd
L'oa7���
a
� `"
Ot�y
D
1 -11
u
(3
'o
j
00
do
�
G,
✓
,oU
o
553612
oa ��I
8`- ,
#00
2,00
�C'4
i
C�cq ���
S
ao
5,23
20 2.
�, g
st
%V
G.14
Lvnc fur
_
Fes!,
UO
d (D
�� L
"Sept
Narrative of Operation:
r,
Total I 3 , 53 3-L
Available Nitrogen 1
Surplus Or Deficit De-picI.� o�
�e /4 / O 7 /2744agC11 eollL
t t)re,— y-,,7ave
Call the Soil and dater Conservation District Office after- you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared by. Ala,, W. '��.,,�'/ _ CT•. 2D-i
Name Title Date
Concurred in by: i�
�� --
f'1
Producer
Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

F, rl,ft
T3y9
Sample Letter to be Used for Land Owned by Someone Other Than Producer
I Ilio, j have agreed to allow
Landowner
So,)— 9,6 &We,.3 to apply animal waste on the following
Livestock P oducer ;s GiN f1G—��OGesS c r, - %" -
fields on tract(s) number(s) % Ti
Field �r
(ASCS #)
Field #
Field #
Field #
(ASCS #)
(ASCS #)
(ASCS #)
_C0a Aa 40�Panned
Crop
(2Oa � Y
Crop
Crop
Crop
12
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
I understand this permission is granted for a minimum of 20 years.
Date

7r!* T
jr,
all "
for,
r -t
'Al
Alf
OWN
.47
- _11*
"JA e
I In
.51
SIX%
MIA;
'4"
A.n
M,, mn,
4AA
Ltd
A
i4
V
..... .....
-!t. • �u, LJ,;,- - ", !
.21 �1 g 4 ll� 7� .
A I
!N A
to xqNj,
W
14
sit
2p
sz,
It'll.
i
4W'
1)4-P
sit. Al
w,Ar
1­4
CIL.r

NARRATIVE OF WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN.
MR HAYES MAY APPLY FIELD I TRACT 8541 BY OBTAINING A
NOTARIZED AGREEMENT. THE FIELD IS COMPOSED OF THE
SOIL TYPE GILEAD. THE FIELD WILL MOST LIKELY BE PLANTED
TO A CORN/WHEAT/SOYBEANS ROTATION. MR. HAYES PLANS
TO KEEP RECORDS ON THIS FIELD AND APPLY ACCORDING TO
HIS SPECIFIC WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED AGRONOMIC
OR HYDRAULIC LOADING.

.
-UTILIZATIONPLAN
ANIM.LiL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(X4.46d aalr'it addltloaal land Saa to be lassed, atc.)
hereby give CGyt���/
per=ssion to dppiy animal waste from his Waste Utilizat on System
on }'— acres of my land for the duration of'time shown below.
I understand -that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. z also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Lando
Waste Producer:
Technical Repre
weer Date:,
Qi Date:�� �-- 7
sentative: 22J
Date: s- - Q
swcD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: " / , 19 �7 to. - / 20 45e
(Ntaimua at ram years oa Cast Shared Reis)
(See Required Specczation No. 2.)
wi+ne3s 'q„d Seal 0 /9 9
No7RRY PcMwc,
My Commission Expires 7anuiry 4 I999
0

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
August 1, 1996
PAGE 1
PRODUCER: R.M.HAYES
LOCATION: 6920 DEVILS RACETRACK RD.
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 5320 hogs design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

' WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE' PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
5320 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 10108 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
5320 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 12236 lbs. PAN/year
Applying_ the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
8 Tan
TIME
579
2
WAGRAM 0-6%
BH
1600
MAR-OCT
MAR-OCT
1600
MAR-OCT
5 3 UN1 GILEAD 2-6% BH $ 1400 0 9 13600
MAR-OCT'
553 UN2 GILEAD 2-6% BH IS �400 0 2
//a rse. SARI MAR-OCT
1188 1 IBLANTON 0-5% BH 8 1400 0 13.9 11560
MAR-OCT
1188 UN1 GILEAD 2-6 FH 4 1200 0 15.4 11080
SEP-MAY
END
TOTAL 11840
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

r
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 3
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
349
1
GILEAD 2-6%
BH
8
400
0
5.23
2092
MAR-OCT
END
TOTAL 2092
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
LBS N -
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
50

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
PAGE 4
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
AMOUNT O]
32.3 1 11640
37.53
N PRODUCED
*** BALANCE
13932-goo J 5
1Z236
- xfr9-Er
77-553 F e JJ U Nz
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 1968.4 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per, year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.

' WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 5
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATIOON:
None. d.Pa.a�r{c, GfW/s 6 At/LlM
19 -P a- - �- 5 Cc-"'s ) -T 5's '-I
12�v. s/,also

�.C'-r>_-1, "�:«"E—a.-••�? �`rt. `. i�., * f',x?�r+t .ra,?Gt f�"."`.r"1'_,'• �, r--,_dr.�'�-, r,p t,11rv+'Cj',Sa'3`Y:`� rrerr, Tp, - h, k,S,y' F _.;� i� ° -
�_
n ':',}Ilk*_
el ;' j,, E.�y_ s r<L" 4+!° 1'C�,j y(�i' r: r I. i�f.�a, �ti�•,1�+,� ,�3 •v. a' A'u-
.:l ! : M J f 7 w. • . C i F. r, Q 'TF•4 '.":� d }- "#fit t,,i - 3. ..rP N- 4 I F .' +
:�r r a�. IT >. yS 1:;•'.,.j� I :/r (. $err,( a .� +( y _ .f o.-•. pr va: a"'j q'4�R' t�+. y��g'd"'�. .a,y M'3 '�. - - -
f h .dtl wry � i,,- n.� r ur,a � ti• C. ` Y jt ��' -' S t- r. � ,
r rf „ '6� 3 - s 'a - - t'F '� tr! ti+ ➢+ i' !Cr i 5'+i. r t r.dar C s -- n.�' .W Lsyu ° { : •r.$ ; $ rr ,�, b R, -
L',i° °� n::y R' - 1�, ~; f "ir r -rd , -•�'' ,ya Y,.,, Ny , (te!' "' '' Ag r- r r+ 9 r ,i'u +
-
_r m r�"a�5+6, �rC w,,, ly k %.ha{.,F• R.a r. )• s f `r ` ! � � y��, Co rY r f �* k +�.r5 V y' i� 1 � .�_> � ,
erd O'.f� .1. 2?'�'� -.} `7,b� �-X'� rC Syr . Lt r - 3+ rtf' _ . s. a a rim o� °, ♦ f -.r e
�p t _!
-Fo "S`'^ -. I Fq: a � � t .. ': s a - v a '• Yy t � s :y '
r 7. � :� � 1 �: f+� c,. ° ,� ' ` i s� r r.r �•' e r � . f 8 y k
r
��✓ 1�t�yr^, .tl r- 1n.� +j },•i t- ry �s xl `�� ''. � ,� - � ••
•,� r•yR' , ;• ., 4> � y+. _r, s - a .J " „a A ,{'te 1 � ��L�•�-I� � ��'! �� � {/ yr, - , r`� 2s .. _ „'� r ° _
�ui7�1 _ wr %,r. i ''r�� r` a=,t' 't�- ckr•.'nry{ (, { n + t - r
e w•ya.. �
J