510032_PERMIT FILE_20171231

ype o• visit. v ,—ompuance inspection v operation •review tcnA.atructure Gvanuation l.J i eenmcai Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral (91 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 14,)7fll M:] Arrival Time: $• Departure Time:I-1,50ailCounty: i Region:
Farm Name: ltd,A _ iyt"br'dDk
Owner Name: ��alt)di1P YY�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'E I �P 1Nothrok Title:
Onsite Representative: n ta—
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:"" p"
Integrator: Ld AW101%I�I
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
:I-
li I
,�/[�)�'�
it ! 7/ �/y r� I
° ,jj��5(.;��i t�ir (( 1Ya
� it
� )
1 'r!
p rl i' f �rr
, I '/. ti;+;l �( r�iL �.ili�'
7 } r ! (• ! li �j lit°.4ljtl
p - ,!',1 t:��:t,'if..ii,"jr
fk {•�f�.f'r !p lr �
if ,' •i- ray!, .�
ll'+Lrif �
�t"�r 'i
r r..l
,,. !•• _ 1 !(`�r
!
1 �::�;.
'. �
{i 'lri.lr�
��
1 i I 1# P��;[J���,�'�r
l
11
_�•��
� � J," 1.18,•
�i 1 f
i 1 1 S r�,;��,-
('(`�y
it
11 {(r•z
f 'i r. rl.
si
{ r '_.7.
� f., p,
+l
!"
bra..
,'(
�
• • - •
��
-,
h '�,'
,I r,
it ,(� ,,�n {
'(� III''
r>1�),
�
� �
��
'i
,Y��(Y
�r
r ,
f
���
�
1 • • -
��
i �r 4r }!. � t � � �tr.
YI { .f ' '. 7 1 !I �fl,l�i7
�
• 1 .
��
Ir
i r�
a'
1 {
li
o.a"rr,l'.,.>.�n',r'r;1,1
I,'!
TICv,tr
�`�'
.t /r
�
�
��'�
1� �
�
��
! /f
!!�
�i�i �
! i' "h�,
! A�{��r f�'i ' (t§l�� •'�1 �I
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: C11,a-71 IN
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 54 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
[RNE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [R No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
�A NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
U NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
NNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA U NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ' ❑ NA NNE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CR NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ®NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ka
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge S
❑ NA 6RE
® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

r
Facili Number: jDate of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No [:]NA ®NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes (g No
Yes [:]No
[:]Yes [52 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
,,,r, ,.
Comments refer, to tie'stton # t;U lainlan IYES answe..... t nd/or;°°"'""" "addition"al"reco'mmendation's',o'rtan''atlier,'co'mments' t:'r'� . X.
.rtrra�it rEt ,:t ,t ; ryri r. tr . 'i n r 1.,1 ni r... J
nr r n �,a n u: „a ,rrr,,r „ rr r..;. ur, r, r
..; I ! L r! ,� :.1, i 6.Ir f Pr l .I11 , h _r.,t I,. ! .t6h it., i ! !f. fl'o'' 1,dr re_1...a ! grid r , a. �l'atta:l .+
r..lrrrtr „„G,.� .,,1r,.,i,l; trn. . ,irt l/d ,l� t.,f! IIP,,, !., ,i„tt.. at..r„bi.:t„ l�..r7.�tr,r( �l ..ftl�,,../ ,flrtrl ,t_t, l.rfl, ,r .tat i 31,! .._.r,l1t, 1 r'lt Y � t.l �4r4;f ..
Ise drawin s of facih 0btter ex lain situattons i ;useradd�trlonal'i a es!as! necessat�f 1E lil"+,
., , .. r , ,.... ,., �,,....� .�, ....1, .....,,..>~Y,�. � , ... ,�, ,.P,., . ,,,,,,,,, , �.... ,. ... , P . g
q�j(' ��eVa(�afi°�o ^ Nvir;��Aboutas 1/), ranipel�S Sf rwn ad s'61v1h . .�eS tm �s� a� �J
No a►� r s lt w4v 1 s `WiW b01 VV+ was announced. a dal ahead, Trupe4tevt W
Reviewer/Inspector Name: O'Llal Sehn�et P/' Phonel' n--pi- 3 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �i Date: 1 0
Page 3 of 3 !schr649 ncd,en r jo v 21412015

its 0 VS 31(31,
Type of Visit: GFCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I' )I L31J B :] Arrival Time: I Departure Time: '� County: U'0hRegion: W
Farm Name: E ldt f ae, Weifb✓DO k 1'aim
Owner Name: 'EId ldaf: Wej+bay k
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: 1-Q✓ e. RL' r Oy/ OQ►Lf
Facility Contact: 6i7 M j fG/� (' Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: D164- i4chp I I Integrator: QlMft
Certified Operator: EWUat.— Wfi+b/D&k Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Design
Capacity=
Current
��7lTi'B�ra
Wet Poultry
gn
Capacity
Cwatrent
Pop.
Cattle
Design ®urrent
Camp city Pop.
'
��P��`o�`p
�ttl
r
i S'?�
�
lt1A'lkdl
UARi'rrYa7ILT7J�i
ilP� x
iMItR
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
IDairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
$(p
airyHeifer
r
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
b Po.u,.l:�_,
!R.`N�raru
Ca aci_
Po _,.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
"111,
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
I
ther
ItlpnJ�ittwAlLrwurtlutrwrrwn3aantwrtuAtmraS+�unu�turtmutrlttMnAatawutM.ltMut�umrft
nNtNaFtWStulArtnllrq+uranNtostruunrrmr�YlrivurilManluurr•n+rlu
1
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters []Yes Callo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 3 Date of Inspection:
$
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
C, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6.
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): T
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
rq�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[5�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑. Yes
[1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes (2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance.or improvement?
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[—]Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
(M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
U NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: r- Date of Inspection: ^�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon"
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [' No ❑ NA ❑ N E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [N NE
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [:]Yes 1,21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [:]Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 5'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a�-�Idr►d je wf I I n?t%L ) acre ho✓p Co inLll'n at byt
�7SIv , ( 4� �-�.� {s °�, ��a�s�Ovaab-_Seal
, abo
sl e
RJI &I !1- Iq7jpM 300�,
Soil 'TPA 1311 , 04cSa, 4,od A ► a 7- sur
J � 118
it I
YV00 3$Qr
91 aI l 1-7
I, (0a
W ® 0 05A
�laall�
I,
bo03g7o
N0oy14r
q
lay I�
1, 03
Woo M
The. I$o Annual ree 1s dve by 311oIIe, U6�4-k
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ' '6� SC{1y1,P1'&_-
COPY- Fff PO t Ct a IX /1%,
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
j00A, schr>eirl- ®ncd enrgov
Date: Feb l . a 01
21412015

Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ` t7 Departure Time: ; . County: , Region: RAD
Farm Name: �% hle�i-bm�� 1—o�M
Owner Name: S idrldae.
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: 3610 Av>oP/ *ie. L , P'pw, ®akr
Facility Contact: jir�? Title: COnSvl�Q7i Phone:
Onsite Representative: 6/ M &J ±I I Integrator: oo&Ly0
Certified Operator: E Idrl d je . YVesFboo k Certification Number: 1-7795
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine
C►apaciGy
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
7011 Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dair Heifer
Farrow to Wean
I)esig.n
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dt Poultr,
Ca acit,
Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I
113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
OO ther
Turkey Poults
01
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
'R' No
[DNA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
§j] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: 5- 3 Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1. Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes KA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes IU No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes J�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes E' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes IV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C^No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA,❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
64 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: 51 - 3 Date of Inspection: 63
24 'Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
15a No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[,� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA 5� NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
15J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
�R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No
0 NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
0 NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explaimany,,YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other.comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional. pages as necessary). '
a&-Pld,4�Y0QY)4_ 3,shU Co3i%v�4b7�a1aa)aorg,
ud�eSurve .,`�,-�-
}���irm 300-f-+ GOA U6
WokAna
VV00) ob )r 1,-� Soy) - i��l►h , Lime nen& o�-o�3t�rldctP,
v0049It ala 11 I, �� luos� evPxb o4(e 'No vf, bei
Coo mmfdl
9i 11 �I9 ij uv-WAP,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: noun SChh'Pj ar
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
CU 4-117 O/P &(,
Phone:
r��Q?V—q;)3 �
Date: f e
21412015

Type of Visit: W Compliance Inspection V Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: W/T' / I County: J hJ
Farm Name: Idr iC�nP _ iYP Tf i8ok Porgy Owner Email:
Owner Name: PidddeP_ IMP.&GYCIok Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 3&1() vl fJ',2. PA, , r Llf Oaks
Facility Contact: / f/+ H I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: B (8 ' Integrator: 6oldi bGV o
Certified Operator: _Wf04P Kio hmolr
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Region: RAO
Certification Number: 117S,5
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
C►apacity
Current
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
Desig"ULWurjrent
Capacity
I
Pop.
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
C«apacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Mo
3010
Dt Pou_ ltry
Layers
Design
C•a aei ,
Current
Po
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
OtherI
Other
I
Turkeys
ITurkeyPoults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
fallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

. Facility Number: - 3 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
f' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[S Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[—]Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
15a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 'a a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? []Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes [S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
N NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
15a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
EZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
"c" No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) kExplain{any.YES answ.°ers and/any additional,recommendati6ns oryany�otlier,comments ,
Use drawings of facilityito`betterkezpltiii situat►ons (usera�dditional pages'as necessary)
�;�1�1dy� will n hrs co1-h%��:7 , by-t�e�loP aol$
s vy- qb(('oU�
Ca(( b �l C1 hfilly - rye jIT6JALAMe -
J
Yva)k jej
NfwOA-e i� �� Soils , le_ ,SLO19aa) I I IWI �- NO I �naQ n�ek)Cugzn Ok,
►Dial is wooa15s ���� S.� �
�la�l iS wao�as9 1,4y%e �b w� %
@Ifglls 1,53
1011191/y wooa'lls o�$a
7. eo,�e-mow woalies ) 0 W o,, JcW balk -►side f n0rt' )
ill ► is
Reviewer/Inspector Name:,()()j�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: qIq 7jj_ qa,? y
Date: 1 b a a, o 10
10
21412014

70 < yp
• ����_�
Facility No. s 3 k Farm Name Err�nr�rO, O 00 Date ab
Permit ✓ COC OIC_ NPDES (Rain breaker PLAT Annual Cert Daily Pipe )
Lagoon Name, S forspillway
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Freeboard / Last Recorded in
Observed freeboard
Sludge Survey Date
(—
.5 IV
Sludge Depth ft
Liquid Trt. Zone (ft)
ha
Ratio Sludge to Treatment Volume if> 0.45
Date out of compliance/ POA?
a7
OEM . . ..
--Q'I�Ri�----
Soil Test Date
Crop Yield `�
Transfer Sheets
pH Fields
I3aIr3' Wettable Acres
RAIN GAUGE
Lime Needed
o�,Yre �, WUP
Dead box or incinerator
Lime Applied
100t.0- W- lfmU Weekly Freeboard
Mortality Records
Cu-I Zn-I
1 in Inspections
Check Lists
Needs S (S-1<25)
120 min Insp.
Storm Water
Needs P
Weather Codes
0004:1ti5- 1/WW7X%R �v00`14�k,/ bayl.�✓
Verify PHONE NUMBERS and affiliations
Date last WUP RRO FRO or Farm Records
Date last WUP at farm CtW I I) libfloo Lagoon #
App. Hardware Top Dike
Stop Pump
Start Pump
Swo►,--q _� (S
J
Conversion- Cu-1 3000= 108 Ib/ac; Zn-I 3000= 213 Ib/ac

(Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: QrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 EmerSencv 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -s vI Arrival Time: ffl� Departure Time: Q County: Region: R P-0
Farm Name: Ewe VVej &06 k PXM
Owner Name: 61 di jd sp Yy., }& 00 k
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: UpiQ d8' j�e jv� QakS
Facility Contact: 8 /��'} NJ j ` (� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: E ld" Id„P. iNPJ 1- &0'0 k
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator: Go I dJbdto
Certification Number: ( -77 fig
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Current
Design Current
Design
Current
_f
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry C«apacity Pop.
Cattle
C►apaciuy
Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer �-
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
p
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr Poultr C•a aci , Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
I I 10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 5' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No []NA []NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - 3X JDate of Inspection: )
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: '
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes fo No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ER No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require ❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ER No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
[DNA
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ Yes fp No ❑ NA
❑ Yes [N No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [q No
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J�R No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [Z No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
g NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

4
T cility Number: 5-1 - 3'A, Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
151 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
1Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
UNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
C3 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
C�eNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
CZ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
6, Id(Idie W,o,t-Weti wdS 3 his coy ',►, ed, ►al 3I 1 Is,
ay. Calibrai�p,� 11 lAgjfy ►q�9�rn
as,Sl�d9e, SvfvZW'
51ally,��1,4-Fi-sl�d e
earewk
7ay,� e 1 19 i bk for txenA o, i-F-
al.wm� Aralyses a Mvl�iple, Soil -�e�� �r�, ©ctJiVoV ao, �ow(
BIaoI I3 VV0613r® 3 ss LPrnf- nerds 6 rf klow I -h',/au°e.� corfB1-4 2 J' c 6�1
-613I 1i y
w ppg
01.)Dl 1 �
woo$
I0114(14
W0031(r
wywin
lab
ln5rec*61 dakwar cot tog f,0*1 i lslls �o I (di5- rvNbe
13;Ihh4 is vp �0dak__
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 'a0 !H Sr h n'Pi"Pr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: qj�__-Pj- )QD
;301 & a 0 lS (UVJ)
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: Co pliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:, S� h �jTv �gion�
Farm Name: ���rf;�_Qp�� (�� „�(�y� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: !FICL�-I'Ag e West broo k Certification Number: $�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
3 e 3 <S. 9L -7
3SLI (, 9fcLvpe<- Hoos2 �dCi [k Fnye— Om K6 ;2 15 aLf
Design
Current
Design Current
Design
Current
Swine
Capacity
Po
le
Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
iry Cow
Wean to Feeder
iry Calf
Feeder to Finish
iry Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr1 Poultar Ca aci +,
Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Pouets
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes.�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:2�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes „0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes E!J�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes El"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ,,ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): i) Q I Q "�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes _4fj'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes J:3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes JD110
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes . f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes P�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes P_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? []Yes 21"No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes kT'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 - 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 5 1 11 jDate of Inspection: 10
✓MD*the acili fa'l tocalibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
li y ou o pliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes XNo
[3NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes , ;?�Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [;K%10
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other comments x .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
oLus- on co Lx,�
31
-ate r3 3 I o 2_ o
4&1 P�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 1
Date: J 0
2 4/2011

Cype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review' p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
teason for Visit: grRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:,_Tohnst0iv Region: Q9_0
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: F IA r- i� lksl CA d Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: F lei 6 ❑ e— _W es -}- boo o k Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
n
0%app,
Current
Design Current
� esign Curren
Swine
it,y
Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dais Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
$
Farrow to Wean
Design C«urrent
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr Poultry Ca aci ,� Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
F-Fo—ther
I
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: S1 - jDate of Inspection: - d�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: rLp
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [D*No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,,,ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '�2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 1;3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 21"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 2J.-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 12rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [-]Design [:]Maps [:]Lease Agreements [-]Other: O
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 5 1 -,9 Date of Inspection: 0
24. Did the facility' fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance W3 f ermit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes JA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes �?`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]Yes
[:]Yes
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers; and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary):
l �+ S u,%ZeA_ ex -4 r s i'o N V n+ i l 0101 y S v C-N `f d u e. v N or- tb a .( o
Soil S0,VNV?1e- 10-a$-11 I a-31-I y
S [. 0 1 a Lt v l c o p pe c 4 �,ct.rc, c�va,�
W H 10 I Lb PA O&xA L vu,,C, 0 rv. rn eH H 1 a 0,9 r e c o m rre ^ d "d
C-r\ 0) WAR, f a - 3.1�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur<
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 919 9 41 Y-2M
Date: / -'---
14/2011

t'_
Type of Visit: 91Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (� Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 1t)1.1clEArrival Time: Departure Time: County Region: aR ( )
Farm Name: FI(i(' ws+bCook F(X(` V \ Owner Email: I'Uj)
q'Iq- 39- r?19'-/
Owner Name: •e sf Phone: Ctt q - 1 S G^ f '7 f/
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: '�,C 1+ An W e S f b",k Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
op.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
I INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dr oultr
Layers
Design Current
Ca aci , Po
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
keys
Turke Po Its
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes r]�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? T
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

t' ,
lFacilityNumber: *-) j - L-A Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) J
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? T
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.))
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
C�`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
[:]NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [;rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes m No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
Page 2 of 3
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 5 - Date of Inspection:
24. id the facility fail to calibrate aste appplication equipment as required by the ermit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c COi Cul%Pc'Cl+lvnj 199%ern Sc;e� 'solo
25. Is the facility out o compliance with permit 4itions related to s udge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No [DNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. l.(/YCjI- A 9.0 i L/
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [;TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certificatign? []Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes P!TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E (No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�Z' Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: t)q/- L/-
Date: /���/ /
2/4/201I

Type of Visit 91Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit VRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time:RTI Departure Time: Q: County: ZQV%MS+De� Region:�R o
Farm Name:"`"'"'"'r`"`l1���"'`����f'"`I��& e (.�) CS'� 6'00 qC!<.0 W1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: , 14=t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator.60 O I
Certified Operator. I &i&P Wes+ bco Operator Certification Number: �s
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = ° ` ❑ " Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ ` "
Design Current Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle
C«apacit�y Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Laver
❑ Dairy Cow.
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
%Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
� Non -Layers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
ElBeef Brood Cow
"
❑ Turkeys
OO ther
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes RTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [;ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
91No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name I alla V1110 A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: J /
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 5 1 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents I
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
L'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
12<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
aMa I b t-, *Q - 9'� qP m
25. Did the facility fiat to conduct a srudge survey as required by'the permit?
aloe= Tail t�{
26. Did the facility to have an actively certified o erator in charge?Q�cao
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
9ZT4 'Au/4 o
re.9-s CLPpear ko % U1) �o doA e_
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 2fNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes [ZFNo
❑ Yes O'No
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
JZ
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
rage 3 of 3 111Z61U4

20 @ M
Permit: A W5 S 1 003a- Phone: q' Iq _ 9 IS -- 410 y
Name / Contact:
Integrator:
On Line
Samples:
Designed:
Sludge
Survey: Extension:
Size:
Calibration:o a-© I

r
wo Q34 LI-la-10
so a 3
wow_
wo
.V
wow
3-1 E TO- 1
ETC
�13
la�la q ETC /o
of f—TO I 1
y_G-o9 a,4
OWN
,.....ri

Permit:
Name / Contact:
Integrator:
Fees:
Designed: Size:
Sludge
Structure:
Survey:
Extension:
Structure:
Survey:
Extension:
Structure:
Survey:
Extension:
Structure
Survey:
Extension:
Structure:
Survey:
Extension:
Calibration:
Notes:
r.
e

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Report: W06494
Grower:
Westbrook, Eldridge (Eric
ET) Copies to:
z' Waste nal sisRohort.vFarm
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Received: 03/25/2009
Completed: 03/27/2009 Links to Helpful Information
Johnston County
Sample Information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted) .
Sample 1D.
N
P K Ca
Mg S
Fe Ain Zn
Cu B Mo Cl C
EWHOG
Total 891
92.9 1350 161
33.0 46.2
1o.6 1.21 11.0
8.33 1.92
IN--N
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na Ni Cd
A Al
Se Li pH
SS C."N DM% CCE% ALE(Kgal)
ALS
-NO3
273
7.7
Description:
OR-N
Nine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients. Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 . allons
Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe
Mn Zn Cu
B - Mo Cl
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li
Broadcast
3.7 1.2 10.8 0.94 0.19 0.27. o.o6
0.01 0.07 o.o6
0.01
2.3
Soillncorp
5.8 1.4 12.2 1.1 0.22 0.31 0.07
0.01 0.08 0.06
0.01
2.3
forth Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
-x} \ through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission - Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Vi it Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: g Q Arrival Time: : 3 Departure Time: r 3 County: Region:
Farm Name: ` Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = i = Longitude: = o = g a {{
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
C•apaeity P� J n
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle C«apacit�y Population
❑ Wean to Finish
Av CA 1110
Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer
I I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finis
Q
Dry Poultry
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures: D
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Faciliky Number•5 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J� No ElNA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) /
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? /
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks))2]�No
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ;YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes [2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
'rye ° .4
Comments (refer to -question'#) .xr Explaimany YES'answers and/or any, recommendations or any other comments
Use,drawmgs of facility�to°better explain situations. (use�additional`pages as necessary): p� ;
7
-77
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
.23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a-.
Additional�Comments and%ortD",rawngswA&i"Wi�$ ¢� KVB AIR
G-gyp 0 R
3-3(-o 9
w o S o a 3 d&tapj
- o 15
C�
©Q __ ��, , Lb Y`C'n2. 0 J&e
V
12128104

NCDAUS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report: W05023
`
Grower:
Westbrook, Eldridge (Eric ET) Copies to:
199 Scout Rd.
' `��
Four Oaks, NC 27524
M�` ` z'WasteAnalysis
`O �nev
Report
Farm. -
Received: 02/04/2009 Completed: 02/06/2009 Links to Helpful Information
Johnston County
Sample Information
Laboratory; Results . rts per million unless otherwise note
Sample ID.
N
P K Ca Mg S
Fe AM Zn
Ca B Mo Cl C
1
Total 565
95.7 1591 142 26.8 41.5
8.50 0.48 5.36
5.33 1.90
IN-N
Waste Code.
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb Al
Se li pH
SS C.•N DAM CCb% ALE(Hgal)
340
7.55
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Recommendations:
...._....._ _
"' -'
Nutrients Available for First Crop
16s/1000 gallons
Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
Application Metbod
N P205 K20
Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu
B Mo CI
No Ni Cd A Al Se Li
Irrigation
2.4 1.3 - 12.7 "
0.83 0.16 0.24 0.05 T 0.04 0.04
0.01
2.8
.North Carolina
.--..,_ Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission - Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

To view a report, simply click the View Report or Now Report Button
To download data from multiple reports in a single Excel spreadsheet, check the
desired boxes in the right column then click the Downlond Selected Reports button.
Reports found:
Attention: If a repots loads incorrectly (for example, without client name and address),
please wait a few minutes and try again.
E ,9' k Ta Giiower
0
C(
1:-tIO
�9

NCDEE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee .Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 16, 2009
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Road
Four Oaks, NC '27524
Subject: Permit No.AWS510032
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Westbrook,
On February 10, 2009, staff of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section
(APS), inspected the subject farm. We wish to thank Mr. Westbrook who was present and assisted
during the inspection. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a compliance inspection.
The subject facility was found to be in compliance in accordance with its waste utilization plan, and the
associated spray fields were found to be in good shape. Please also refer to the attached inspection
report.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this inspection please call Jane Bernard at [phone].
Aquifer Protection Section
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Location: 3800 Barrett Dr.; Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
fnternet www.ncwaterquality.ore
An Equal Opportunity \ Aflinnative Action Employer
Sincerely,,
Jane Bernard
Environmental Specialist
NorthCarolina
Avurally

j;,
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510032 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 02/10/2009 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Eldridge Westbrook Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Eldridae T Westbrook
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 199 Scout Rd Four Oaks NC 275249785
Physical Address: 3546 Harper House Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
SR 1008, between SR 1009 and SR 1194. UT Hannah Creek.
Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Latitude:35°19'15" Longitude:78°17'20"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Eldridge T Westbrook Operator Certification Number: 17785
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Eldridge Westbrook Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Barns were empty- hogs were delivered at the time of this inspection.
Waste Analysis W05023 12/20/08 = 2.4, W01079 8/7/08 = .87, W08718 6/13/08
CALIBRATION EXPECTED 197 GPM ACTUAL IS 197 GPM
SLUDGE SURVEY 12/10/08 LZ=7.3
6/16/08 2.6
SOIL 1/17/08 IIME APPLIED AS REQUIRED
12/31/08 ANNUAL AVERAGE POPULATION 2890
RECORDS FOR WASTE ANALYSIS WERE INCOMPLETE. CONTACTED THE AG LAB AND VERIFIED WASTE ANALYSIS
DATES.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook Facility Number : 510032
inspection Date: 02/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,880 0
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Tvoe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon #1 19.00 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook Facility Number: 510032
Inspection Date: 02/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook Facility Number : 510032
Inspection Date: 02/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visif: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑E
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook
Inspection Date: 02/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 510032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 5

FARM WHO
51-23 Eldridge Westbrook
2/18/2009
W05023 12/20/2008 9-4
10/21 /2008
10/6/2008
W01079 8/7/2008 Q •6?r
6/8/2008
8/12/2008
W08718 6/13/2008
4/14/2008
2/15/2008
W04016 12/17/2007
10/18/2007

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division..PALS Web Application
p PALS
I InstruIXional Info
Home
•
M Growers
y
:�:Quick report Search
Grower Login .1
$ Advisors
'! Advisor Login'
to Agronomists'
1 1; Agronomist Login
•.
R Co-op Agencies
F CO -Op Agency Login
Repo (,; i Status NO.
Resort ,Lab i.: Status Farm ID PDF File CSV File
i — Type Date Samples;
j�Year
aI0D9il("
�M
6
Preie�Maled
dcb
I1i1i3
1214/20NEE
• —:..__
'pp
(((��
ISASo
,
_I�L2
20091
W05023
Waste"
Predictive
jj
Mailed
2t6!
t2009
• •
"
�' ■ � 2009
W05032i�Waste
.:. .1
Predictive �[Mailed
`&'2 09
,
'l
•. •
®2008
28840 i !Soil
ig.._..I_LEE...,.rC
Predictive
L
Mailed
L Ira a
4/112008
a! i
BRIT f 8
f
c
L3
• •
1 F
3 L3
t ti
..:�_...:..
!
�, a
k
2008 �j�28$45
��Soil'
� PredicUve��Malled
�13/2812008
�
�fi�r� �
• •
s i 2408
28842i 1I
Soil I Predictve I
Mailed 1f�3128J2008
DENNING
-12 I :
��
j • • It
,. _..al..,-
12008
.,..J
1)
28841 ISoll'
j Predictive �iMailed
1,
13/28/2048
BEST &
12
0 . •
o +9
O08 118697
i
Sod ((Predictive
Jl
�JAGKSONdt
Mailed 2008
11161 �y
l
„�(
• • ��
1�
it-
2008
t
(�I
W01079 Waste
P edicUve
L_
L
817/2008
t.1
® 9
•
2068 I1{W08718
�_.
Waste
Predictive llMailetl
_ _,3
611312008 {(
_i_�L
{!}/ •
o �2008
(W04016W6ste `(Predictive
Mailed 12/1712007
E 1
I • •
s�
f s
ii2007
500878
JL___
((Solution fD(a noshc
L._
(Mailed ffi4l1612007
r2 • •
(®�
20l)7 I W46893
..,�%_..ga_1��L_:_.___k:��__
ii 11
(Waste Predictive } N9ailed l 3/612007 �1
`
.icy
- •
(; 2007 , (LW02754
�, Waste.: i�Preitict(ve. ��
Mailed,.1��1011012006I
,...
, _ �:'' i • , _ ._ . .

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number' ' Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 01compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit k Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
DO a bt✓v�tD Arrival Time:0`01 Departure Time: I County: 3Qff Y�%$!UI'i% Region: (LYw
r'
Farm Name: Gj I d j2 O n 0 L 1 J-D Owner Email:
Owner Name: u) EaTha= tZ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
O' sa Representative: Integrator:
/y"
Certified Operator:, )9_T_ Dnr'6 a%F_5*,642ocK &L.Ve Operator Certification Number: _17 7 aS
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish $ 30
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = s = « Longitude: = c =1 = A$
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity^ Populatio-a
Non -
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Pouets
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Coyd
Number of Structures:
ED
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
[]Yes ,1' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 1:2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ;?"No
❑ Yes ;!fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Fdcility Number: 1 — a Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): _
Structure 4
❑ Yes [;�<0
❑ Yes 7NO
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes F El NA [I NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑o
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
VI/wo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
EXo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
I /J No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
RI�40
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 99/ 90y3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: o9 --
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Mans El Other
❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Doe cord keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
to Application . Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis�il Analysis Waaste Transfers
/❑ Annual Certification
1
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes A!!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
255. Did the facility fail to conduct as slug ge survey as required by the permit?
26. Di�dhe facility have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes
['No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ;;rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes EdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Pio ❑ NA ❑ NE

P
0 Division of Water Quality
FaciVty Number 0 .Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit QrSkmpliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: �� Departure Time: I 2 ice' County:v0YU Region:_
► ► —
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ 4 = Longitude: ❑ o ❑ g = 1I
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Coyd
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

F*Cility.Number: 5 1 _3ji Date of Inspectiont
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Mans
p El Other
;11'Y es ❑ No [I NA El NE
❑ Yes' E,, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application r pp ❑Weekly Freeboard � Waste Analysis Soil Analysis El Transfers Annual Certification
Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain In pections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
s y/a oo -7 3.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

E - -
Facility Number: -1 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ' No
El Yes No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: ' 7
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

• 4
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510032 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 06/07/2007 Entry Time:10045 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Eldridae Westbrook Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Eldridae T Westbrook Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 199 Scout Rd Four Oaks NC 275249785
Physical Address: 3546 Hamer House Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'15" Longitude: 78°17'&'
SR 1008, between SR 1009 and SR 1194. LT Hannah Creek
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Eldridge T Westbrook Operator Certification Number: 17785
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
21) When using Waters Labs for soil testing need to request testing method Melich III and request to include copper analysis.
24) Calibration conducted 5/10/2007; 1.08" ring, 192Gpm, 70psi, 300' dia,
25) Sludge evaluation, waiver to 2007 thus survey due this year.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook
Facility Number: 510032
Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon #1 19.00 35.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook
Facility Number: 51.0032
Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook
Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 510032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Rains
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook Facility Number: 510032
Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook Facility Number : 510032
Inspection Data: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook
Facility Number: 510032
Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Technical Assistance
Needed
Provided
..-.....................................-- ........................
34. Waste plan revision or amendment
❑
❑
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
❑
36. Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
❑
❑
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
38. Missing components (list in comments)
❑
❑
39. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
40. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
42. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
❑
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
❑
45. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
❑
48. Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
❑
49. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
50. Site evaluation
❑
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
❑
52. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
53. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
54. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
57. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
58. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
❑
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
62. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
64. Waste operator education
❑
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
❑
67. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
69. PLAT Assessment
❑
❑
70. Other
❑
o
Page: 7

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook Facility Number : 510032
Inspection Date: 06/07/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
List Improvements made by Operation
Improvement 1
Improvement 2
Improvement 3
Improvement 4
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Page: 8

Facility Number=
5 14"
Z
vro'urv�s�uo ui wafer, quay 4 ` ��` 7z"
ivision,of Soil and W,at�er,Conservation ;¢
Other.Agency,
Type of Visit 6 Co fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: i 1jD /Arrival Time: t® Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: C; I d r i d Ce Ue S �D / da �� i2�' Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: (�j / 5,
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = S = « Longitude: = o a 4 =
66
Design Current Design Current t , Design Cqr&Cent, s
' Swine # Capacity 1opulation Wet.Poultry Capacity Population,K. Cattle• r�Capacity Population ;
y ❑. _ I...
Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
❑ W n to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer
` — _— — — — _ .4F
eederto Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry;
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars J a x
OtheC .1, 3. n` . a s �e'. �'-.,is ie,,• { ;a`'
❑ Other �; . Numberof Structures ;
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes W
A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NoA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 12128104 . Continued

Facility Number: 1 — 2�- Date of Inspection %D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): p `�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes o NA ElNE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment2N�
�E]
fy DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind/Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) �Y �L�r Gt1a7 SDI
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N -❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comment's (refer to question #) Explain any YESS answers and/or any recomm`endahons orany other comments.",
Use drawings of facility to better eXplam 'sftuat�onsadditional, pages'as necessary)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
I "
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of J 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection (1
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ Ain Tp ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 7NOy[:
� NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El YesrNo[:]
A ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑YesA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "NoNA El
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510032 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleiah
Date of Visit: 10/16/2006 Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Owner: Eldridge T Westbrook
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 199 Scout Rd Four Oaks NC 275249785
Physical Address: 3546 Harper House Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
SR 1008, between SR 1009 and SR 1194. UT Hannah Creek.
Latitude:35°19'15" Longitude:78°17'20"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Eldridge T Westbrook Operator Certification Number: 17785
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Eldgridge Westbrook Phone:
Primary Inspector: Patrick A Towell Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251032 Owner - Facility: Eldridge T Westbrook
Facility Number: 510032
Inspection Date: 10/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon #1 19.00 29.00
Page: 2

r
Type of Visit compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit gRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 Arrival Time: = Departure Time: County:Region:
Farm Name: _ U0 (Z-Z IDGZ_ aE_s Owner Email: t(
Owner Name: Phone: 111 91
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:_C pt�� txl E.Sl"t3?-�x� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 071657
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o F76 =44 Longitude: = o = 6 = <<
kkfi
Desii,!
Swine Capacity'
Currenty w
Population Wet Poultry
Desrgn YCurrenY
Capacty Population
llesign`
Cattle k Cap�.city
Current
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
L. ��
j''
Dry. Poultrry'
❑ Layers
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Non -Layers
El Pullets
❑ Gilts
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
OO ther
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
'ate:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes JoNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?--�
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ,,,_�,�No
❑ NA
El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes ,rJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — 3 Z Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes YNo [I NA [I NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
;No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
O'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
;ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes
;3"No
[I NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
)E� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evider1ce of Wind Drifl El Application Outside of Area
1�_,144 f60
-�� y4o
12. Crop type(s) L ,BAR N.ilc� 1� 4� C- / 'A / S& 'eEC (-,,A S
19 0
13. Soil type(s) W6r Gfn­ IWO
,J
14. Do the receiving crops differ from thos designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[]Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]
Yes
;3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
El NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name I a '` H-JiJ ,'I Phone: 919 S71 7OC7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: `7 o -
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: 51 —32 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Zv jj�
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CX M)p readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes ;ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improveTent? If yes, check zz_the ap ropriate box below. El Yes U f Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste cation ❑ W 1>17 eeboard ❑ Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ Rai all [I Sing ElCro✓✓pd ❑ 120 Minut nspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ We
,�Or Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permitIllib.r ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? -z./ SIoq ❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 6 161-05-
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? .
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional ,Comments and/or'Drawin,gs: „x M N s
z S 1 k'T��1S : oN 6 �A vT cif % Zr, to t� ..r vs 1 S Z oc� 8 6► RtLC C 'i r' Gq'%�'�
ac-' IAA �.� a C� F ; C -own
12128104

Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [3Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Z Z Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ['Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: / ..................Fib 9A���i.........FAf t............................................ County: ..........i nfl. Is ! afL ............... .......................
OwnerName: ........................................ ; .......... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: ................................................................ . ................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: .... 5��` P 6E-W es Integrator:........ ....... ............... .... ................... .o.. .g... .:............ ....................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4 «
;Ca acit
Po "a_lation
tt!routuy ;, ., : Capacity !,Po 'ulation gib, Latue Ca" aci iPo"ii atioi s
❑Wean to Feeder
fl ❑Layer ❑ Dairy _
l1'$!1� ❑ Non -Layer ❑ g � ,, �� Non Dairy
;11 1 tt
❑ Other
12feeder to Finish
Z70D
_
�_ ❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feederi
[`
❑ Farrow to Finish
5 Total D ' Ign ap'ac
eC ltjy,
ff �+ 1 3 f 1 3 5i iE1 i T�.
SSL i.:
Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes 1110
❑ Yes /2'No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ Yes VNo
Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 31
12112103 Continued

:►ice t;
Facility Number: S(7 3 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
VNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
VfNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
PTNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
)YNo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frioz n Gr ooun dl� Copper and/or Zinc��
12. Crop type N A`-t nffb�i se G�'r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal aste ygement Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
XNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
L2 No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes [3,fqo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [2(No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ONo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ((No
Air Quality representative immediately.
ti Y
.4.�5, .t„+:dl'= !.Is .IH "`•2 .14<,,,k?t#kErYt};'ct :tt.,,,a7:: `.4�. ,bn1.i
'Commeritsd refer toy' uestion4y# � i lam an �YFS answersiand/orfan �recommendationsfor an{� other;comments
!!,,„"tI:�Li. H��iidw
a lsedrawmgs
;
C
opy Final Notes 1 fAClll tOkbCttCl'{C7Ct� 181lltSlal$tlOI13.� IISC $ddlti0 ellAlj S � CS�;SSsIIet't!iC@SS81 , ': E
❑
t , a
i 1 � t I•. .!!';,,yi !, zf9 . �. q. , �{. ,i gj i x t .� ..ld t,.f [: }#� 3} t c Ya.,E.. f R.. c`{ , 3�Lzi zz}i z ,Rtxa{ d sY d;ir,,t .fr}� q ,.i,. j . {t..,.:
d is fi..i t,RS.M1
„qA� 5�. t Ir i 1k F
i 1 i A€ ' I
Reviewer/Inspector Name,� �I)! : aE:!-..Dt'; t i , t,r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - w.. Date:
12112103 onhinued

Facility Number: S 1 — Date of Inspection ZZ p
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
0 N' o
23. Does record eping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
P No
❑ Wast pplication ❑ Fr7doard ❑ 2a grAj gybis ❑ Soil Santtliq 44-610 '
r 5-'
is '�yy
24. Is fac' ty not in compliance with any applicAe setback criteria iniifect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
F�KNo
25. id the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
J'No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
;YNo
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONO
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
VNo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
;2(No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
rleklr
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ONO
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
17kK0
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? 2-12-5
❑ Yes
No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? L/zq
❑ Yes
ep
VNo
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
F No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
rl 110 TV; —to Tncnontinnc rt An ,al r—tifnat;nn Pf%r
10, No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
rA19^ %4-PjP 12-6CzPAs L" k 9p-�-
�_,o a coad i 1j
ZoD3 ;
12112103

0
Type of Visit _,Q�Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit,.�outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 3 9 O Time: O
Z
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
/1 ermitted ertified [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 1�Lp1Z!`o (T-- L� k— County: Q-)z, 0- r, S "ice j
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �-LO VA
O G� ��f S cr � p1�- Integrator: ��i-bs Q d� 4z'cT -M
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
i
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 6 66 Longitude • E—T OK
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacitv Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer EEI
Dai eeder to Finish k Za❑ Non -La erNon-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total,Desi,gn Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW i
JLJ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste Managen
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes JA No
❑ Yes Pj"No
❑ Yes,gNo
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes CI�No
❑ Yes P"No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): Z�
05103101 Continued

'A
Facility Number: 51 — 32 Date of Inspection 'tom
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PA ❑ Hydraulic Overload
27S !9� lid l ,40
12. Crop type C, 3z4;�MJ3h— �11t S. U _ v► S f3 C-17fSJ '£
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other, Permit readily available?
III 3' c,
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Ce ified Animal Waste Mana.gement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ��z3 /'y�y° `fly s.1
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri ion, ft �oard, wal(te analysis & soil samplri`eeports) JA f v3
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes P3�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
9� Yes �] No
1
6-
❑ Yes [;k�o
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ Yes ZE1 No
ElYes P' o
El Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
/ o
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
��No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Copy U Final Notes
F\/ P—� T+�i'�f G L'004.S Cseo+a Qi'gJS ✓�-s.'T �/
7-14C q!F_s-q-- r+_Aj:06z^I016- Gar'�✓r �y2 ��E••/ �a C,�� 1J�_r
Reviewer/Inspector Name I "`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 3 i 9 aJ5
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: ,�� -3 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes RINO

Type of Visit 'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit VKoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 3 ` OZ Time:
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
P4(ermitted,dCertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated
t or Above �hreshold•
Farm Name: a tir0� K- `���. FM . County:yoc. - - - ,+` _
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: ;Et-D;Lt DCs�__ t_5 QAfi3Em ,
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: 6-OLDS 309Z` 140(,
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: / -71 iV,
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 6 66 Longitude 0 4 64
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .3
05103101
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes l�/No
El�,JYes � No
❑ Yes
[YNo
❑ Yes
c2f'40
Yes
El,
�No
❑ Yes
PNo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: cs 1 — 3Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
4No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
[XNo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
PNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
(No
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overlo�d
Id
El Yes
No
27 S 5a 1?7 1" /6c,
12. Crop type c. _ ti'2 v S- 6 CAM► csils &'p v
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
rNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
J No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
FZNo
Required Records &Documents //��`
17. Fail to have Certificate of CovetagirGeneral Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
P<O
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) �l ;,xyy� +;�j�3/
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ i 'gation, i s oard, vd><ste anal -A & soilIs+amp(e reports)
Yes
❑ Yes
�Io
E3<o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
'�
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
W �VV
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
ErNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
A No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
;E�No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
'.Comments (refer to question #) Explam any, iMnswers and/or.any,recommend ations or anyyother eomments..:
Use drawings of facility to better�ex� lain situations., (use aild tional pa`ges�as-``necessary) , ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
`t oJEP_ 'r�� 6e..aW1�1G sPSe�t .
LEAS /nasfr or P iW 94'� Ok ? 9 L V g p Mt i ?ta V P s L1 IT I- F. SNS
,Or
SO17,
�i M�n%f"Ij E r� _ F� 9 I / Nam- �►✓
[6 AU- ��►
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3o n7_�
05103101 ! Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 30
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
,lYes ❑ No
❑ Yes AE No
❑ Yes �1<o
❑ Yes ,0No
❑ Yes
L?&
❑ Yes
5o
❑ Yes
o
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Z6 o�E• � E� GJ BC -W •f oFC-
p; J . A e- CA J ar✓iTO.
05103101

:3
Type of Visit ,O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 ON Time: =AZ)
Facility Number S
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
J3-Permitted,O'Certified Q Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
.........
Farm Name: WF-S-q g2o:. X— ��1t2 County:..... `'{rJ S-�^j rj
................................................................................................................................................ .
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:
FacilityContact: ........................:..................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ...........................
Onsite Representative:.... tr 4� .% ... S s`Ts� ��� - ...... Integrator: t a�.D S 6?
................................................ .........................................................................
Certified Operator: ................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:,,,,;,.....j. 77 8�
.....................................................
Location' of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• ��
,'Design '
Capacity. P
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
?_eeo
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry
lu Layer
Cattle ,...
E�,
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area,N �oldin `Ponds? Solid Traps ❑ o Liquid Waste Management System r
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes dNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes gj'No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes W90No
I.
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes , 31`0
Waste Collection & Treatment —/
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes PO
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................................................................
................... .................................... .................................... ....... ...................
..........
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on back

Faehity Number: — Date of Inspection 3 0\1 Printed on: 1 /9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or 1
closure plan? ❑ Yes IdNO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an /
immediate public. health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;!fNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes "No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level —/
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 3No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P<O
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes RrNo
12. Crop type (�y-�t •r(S'S _ C-- Qt•'o^j Gym m% �ESCAu p4f7noet-e—,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes _ZNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determinatio ❑ Yes ❑ No
of
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre deter rri at on? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ONO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ,,�No
Required Records & Documents
a z6/
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes _Olio
12(fl+�'� -% 1 'Oj
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri lion, freazd, waste a alysis & soils ple reports) ❑Yes [240
gck2� _ e z3Sr
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �dNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No'
1Q yiolaiicjriS.O dQfc}en.. vv�re �qte� �lirring hjs'visit; Yoj� wiii ceeoiye ijo fu>j'tp r'
ctirresporiden' &. about this visit: •::.........:.......::............. .
17 (_?145- S6yt 1 / Zk CPS 3 . 6-7I)
jYoES 6cA1� �� �EEi�'�1Cr 0� wi'�-�l L`✓ti'%£- - � ►�" {�sso�: AQE1) WC-r� �1��
�� Rico-c.y lZExu�V� v 'Z Pt
� T1 E.J'rroj ",�-b . ES'r'A153 t1 44 X_ G0T 4--r,\,
L.
Reviewer/Inspector Name t4;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C,.._- Date: 3j o f

Fa6lity Number: Date of .Inspection B Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes EfNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes )!fNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 90
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes WNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /No
�t .
1
5100

Facility Number S Date of Inspection j b' tb
Time of Inspection ; 2 b 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ;3"Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
L � , 0 C E. "�5 gQw � Count �a 4, j S TO nj
.. T
Farm Name:......�...!�............................................................................................................. Y:.....................................................................................
Owner Name: CAPS .. c Sl L 1
................................................9
........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:... M�?; ... w
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
.... Integrator:.... o !J.�.. .. nl..LL:!.4Ar..................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ..................................................... I ........ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude $ • ©' �66 Longitude ®• ©� �"
❑ Layer
?,`•. ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
i,'" ❑Non -Dairy
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..............3-0
...............................................................................................................................................
❑ Yes )dNo
[:]Yes f31V0
❑ Yes dN0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,rNo
❑ Yes�No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes.2�No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: SI - 3Z Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
P,asr
12. Crop type �-_E.r c.0 £.. 11AAl-,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
4 7- j So
Waste anae
Plan (CAWMP)?
Required Records & Documents
17.• Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all. components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
deficiencies •w•*re pio ed• Ooring •thjs'vpsjt; • Y:oh Oo futthgr
correspondence:about this visit. ................................... .
M1•, 4 Q"ouLf (CA Jsunn95 Yy S(AltT.4.4 C
�D �E C�ucE ai l- ra.►� ��/L n^�,✓�`na,'ZS j�uC ps (�v.Lb if-
Ic c w' d f R4v-, C,aao c,J'a Rt _
,J
�b o0
❑ Yes PINo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes �fNo
❑ Yes JZ(No
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes j2fNo
❑ Yes j2 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Pq�o
❑ Yes P'110
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes r ] No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes F No
❑ Yes 13<0
❑ Yes ZP4o
❑ Yes P111b
❑ Yes 5;,No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�.,..r ;E e�Ct.�ltsiA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: . �_,,. Date: S1 1(, O-0

'Faci ity Number: — 3Z Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �'&o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �Io
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ,"No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near, the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes lLl No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 0
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 2 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ,-' "o
.&I
3/23/99

Q(Dtvtston of Soi and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Dtvtsi'0' of Soil and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection
13
Drvtston of Water Quality- Compliance Inspection }
❑ Other' , gency Operation Review r
MI
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 7
Timc of Inspecton 124 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated
Farm Name: .............. ........... C:ounty:........................................................
.....................................................................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... .............................. : ......................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:............... ........ Phone No:
.........................................
NlailiivuAddress: ...................`.........................�............................................................... ............ ..........................
,msrte 12e presentative: / f ?"•_L i •'/1�r '� Irate rotor: l':r: ''
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ............................... I ............................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
LatitndC �� �' ��� Longitude �• �
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle. Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy I I --d
QJ Feeder to Finish A G- ❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field :area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made? [:]Yes E2�No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach \Pater of the State'? (If yes, notil"), DWQ) ❑ Yes ZNo
c. If' discharge is observed, what is the e_timated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system') (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes A No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [-'No
I. ante Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑1No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6/
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): �....L ......................................................................
.... .. ........................................................................................................................... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 7ba,
0
seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 contintted ok

FaciliLv Number: =') Date >f Inspection
6 Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement" ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑iNo
Waste ADnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ YesIo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN El Yes o
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes allo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes X❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receivine crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
E�No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
D No
/
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ YesXNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have aC components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists. design. maps. e!c.)
ElYes
WNO
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation. fre oard. waste alysis & soil sa le reports)
❑ Yes
(-,?No
'_'0.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
VNO
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
13'1�0
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El Yes
o
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
911\10
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0o
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
//
❑� o
0; No. W:afi6ris ;or• ddicie:ncles •w;ere nbt:ed• dit.rirtg •t:his:visit. • Y;oix :will receive M further. • : •.
.. corresnonderrce. about. this .visit . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .
99

Facility Number: l — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
11�-
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes FNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �lo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ElYes /] No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or �/
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes )Q No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes I�No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /❑ No
ti6n o"m''menitS all OC,
aal ,'7 ,
D X-
A.
3/23/99

Water' Conservation "'Operation
Division of Soil and Water Co►iservation - Coin li
,
0, p ance Inspection
ivtsi'on of Water Qual"ty Comphance,Inspection �'�
D,Other'Agency'
MPRoutine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other �
Facility Number ��� D.►I:e of Inspection 6
Time of lnspecti.on 24 hr. (hh:mm)
e niitted�Certified d Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...... f..irPQ. i D CE mo✓ S r9 Roo r_ r—A z-^�.County:.......JCj LJ nT To
........................................................................................................... ......................................................................
Owner Name: Phone No:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .................................................................
............................. I ...................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:... ���`Q� ,....{,�,j ,�..T�jgyp�.. Integrator: .S8a ( M ,
L �.........................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..... 1.3.. e ...............
Location of Farm:
r..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................► . ;
Latitude Longitude,
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches) ............ ..................................................
.. ................................... .................................... ....................................
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ,ZNo
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes 21'*No
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

fFacility'Number: 5 i — 321 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of.the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes /j No
❑ Yes �31No
- ❑ Yes ZNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P(No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen El Yes �No
12. Crop type f .41.£.................. .:.g. t�aAF.P. A ....../............,.5.............................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes INo
[]Yes ,(No
❑ Yes )�fNo
[-]Yes ,�'No
❑ Yes 4�No
❑ Yes )�T No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes eNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes / 0INo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes �o
No:vialations tir: deficiencies :were noted during :this visit:: Ytiu tiviyl:re1ceive no further :: :
e . respoiideh . e; about; this ;visit.; ; ; ; ; ;
'Comments (refer to gdestion,#). Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments ti
Use d'rawmgs of facility to befter explain<situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
r/jEgy t.J£ t,t, eVW4 fA e Ato d.L/ clMAA`ri-i O Pam, : ?Rap uciiEg--S'EV>A, r Vt_" A, -"A w JV_ t` I A,
t,JAS're_ AfOL.- con`-r4 ACID f-Eve6cT-s fk"GH Pof-S
Reviewer/Inspector Name
T 11 j 4% 0 QN'-"
S� I =q Tn�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /-- A] a !H V-, — — Date: V'a 17 z I 1 /6/99

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date: fbrc3�Q$"
I
Waste Utilization Plan; Date:
Amount of plant available nitrogen produced/used annually,( G6z yza f Ibs)
Dominant soil series: r J, +-( k
/ Crops to be grown:
/ Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= )
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1/93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Type of irrigation: T e ing G Solid -Set Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1/96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
RE(. IED RECORDS effective 9/1/96 PERMIT�D'FACILITIES
Waste application records (IRR 1 &2) General Permit & COC on site
Annual soil sample reports for 1999 _�� weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index: — )
(Zn index: --- r2fi )
Waste analysis - date last taken 31 z _
2.t PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2

FACILITY NUMBER �5 I - 3 Z REVIEWER- -3- 14voP�
FARM NAME: j�r"ag:ny- DATE: � 8T/ �
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PANT
POND -PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGN/VOLUME CALCULATIONS: WUP - Days of temporary storage: r So
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
Top of dike elevation: S Z ft. 1 st 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
Elev. below structural & storm storage: ft. 2"d 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
Normal operating water level elevation: ft. Structural freeboard in.
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume ft3 Exceeds required volume?
Temporary storage volume ft3 Exceeds required volume?
IRRIGATION: h G%1133 7 V� 3
Operating Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr):
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design.
Design
Design
Design
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual 1
FREEBOARD CK.
1
1 2
J 3
4
. 5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

CRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number SI - 37_
Farm Name: Flip 9.: E)f_ LJ"'r69- 1Y-
On-Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: J, Q J7 -
Date of site visit: It 8
Date of. most recent WUP: wr864
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 OF F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption * E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: ?7S c, pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of informatioCmap-
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number -S ( - 32,
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
COMMENTS3
'R5° 7
u o
'I.
1
�O•�-6
StS
3
I-7, Z3
t
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant. Dull. zone. or point numbers may be used in place of field numhers
denenriinn on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

® Di : ton of Soil and Water Conservation ® Other Agency
tvtsion of Water Quality
10 Routine ® Complaint ® Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of .IDSWC review ® Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
'' 'Y'
Time of Inspection 7 ©0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered Certified ® Applied for Permit ® Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
...
Farm Name: I f'f? h— Count . ........................................
fR — 3 ? q
Owner Name:.........�f...............................^................................................................ Phone No: Y .. ..
FacilityContact: ......:!�"..................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address Q .............. .1... .S�i 0�..........�zD..............1'll� ... s.......� C'._.............4. -�Z v
........................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: ............................................................... Integra D ! J f drU ��U
............................................................................t ...............................
Certified O erator_.g../u.!': �'�' `� ��?) /� .................. Operator Certification Number;.......,,..,....,,,..
Location of Farm: )� f Z/ U 0 Q
r. ............ •. i
Latitude Longitude L�• �' ���
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
P
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N�
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No

V Facility Number: % — Z 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (LagoonsMolding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................ , Freeboard (ft): ....A..... .../
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. CropeC,.P� !.
type f F�set..Gor��,..,z....G��!i..............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes . No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes EJ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Z01 No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 5No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? El Yes
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes
24. Were a additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes o
25. W e any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
o.violations or. deficient deis.werenotedduring' this:visit. You:Will receive,no•hiriher•:
. , correspondeince about thjs: visit l

r�
Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Contplaint O Folimv-up of D1VO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC; review O Other I
Date of Inspection fc Jo
Facility Number
�� Time of Inspection 1 S as 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Cj Registered Lid Certified M Applied for Permit ® Permitted [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name t:,�oulGo f1?r� ra� County ✓b� sp�/�1........................................
Owner Name: ....... E.Ut e..............JA 1. ............... Phone No: .................. U. — ::!OL%...................................
tt�
Facility Contact: ..........FJ.. j...........We �rarl� Title: ......... �.�?Ne'' . Phone No: q 3.`L ...� �4.Y.............
MailingAddress:.......Z ..��.................. f-................ J..:............................. .................................................. ..2.t�.Z .
Onsite Representative:........ ..�c�. i .Qs� ,� 5� 6. ?%.................... Integrator: ......... 1?.e.,��.f.,17.p1�`.Q..........................................
Certified Operator .......... rM... '.ILO ............... ,�7..%% ✓m.o. .......... Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude •
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes m-Ko
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3.' Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 09-No
❑ Yes L.9110
❑ Yes 19'No
❑ Yes aivo
❑ Yes [ -Ko
❑ Yes 13<0
❑ Yes BN_ o
❑ Yes Ly'o
�
❑ Yes jNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: t - 3 -L
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes MIX101
Structures (Lagoons,Iiolding Ponds, flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Eo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ...... 3.�.(S
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes OaXo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 9311�o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [t�o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate, public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application'
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
2_Ko
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop h'Pe b51-ske.........W.4. .......... : M..c.11 �✓
...4.......................................F...4.....................�.
o ......f..............�Q,.�l'�...
e
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[ -tvo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ETKo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ILd�O
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�:zo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
(�No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
M-Ko
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violitionsor' deficiencies.werenoted during' this, visit'. You4ill 'receive.no•further•:
• correspondepce ab;out this: visit:- : � : � ; • ; � � - : � � � - � � � : • • ..• � ; •
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes ►(s No
❑ Yes [944o
❑ Yes UTNo
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C.-4—t.A.2- i'-� Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 3rJ
Facility Number ": Time of Inspection 11-1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Registered 0 Certified ® Applied for Permit Q Permitted 113 Not Operational � Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..��Q�.� rj� ... C:ounty:..........1,�..�/�r��l�!�..................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
...................................................
MailingAddress:' .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...............
............. lnte�,ator:�i-fJl-/,2. $1.5. d:�� C/
Onsite Representative:..i�-�'�ltla.�.i*,...�FsT..�Ltl.�K. ..... �'� � �..........................................
Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 1 " Longitude • ° 66
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [1No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Dischar-e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes j No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes bNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes `[ io
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes eN0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ,�] No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes El No
7/25/97
Continue nn back

i
Facility Number'" —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (La2oons,11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
.......................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ...........x.................. ............ I....................... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes P No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .G.. c, ...... ..G4.t......... I"7�}>1--.............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerMspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violatioits or. deficiencies.were noted during this.v:isit.- Vou:will receive,no ftrther,
correspondence about this.visit: :
...............................
❑ Yes f] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
......................................
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ Yes
1�fNo
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
V No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ Yes
/[Z) No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes Id No
❑ Yes ErNo

JUL-14-1995 iS:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.a2/O2
Site Requires Immediate Artention-
Facility No. -r / ^ ;a
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Zi Z6 S , 1995
Time:
F3rrn Name/Owner-
Mailing Address:
County: tl�-- h -0 s 7-%,!j
Integrator: 77, A IA Ic Phone: Vg,ZZ s' S-o r-,q
On Site Representative: rt-4�e n1el. Phone: WV 9'9y y932
Physical Address/Locadon: Arar1 ht"Hg t�'rr ld ( eFF s'R os
/o_ t' �4neX o
I'CS .iGY137'Pgi/ d� Ehea:ez, chmci IH/f _'t `CN --F SR %004
Type of Operation: Swine l_ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2 9W • Number of Animals on Site.
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: ° Elevation:- >- Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient. freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard: ,mac. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 0 Was any erosion observed?. Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray?Veor No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Crop(s) being utilized: oPasscs
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 9 or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No w-P s�p� •
animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or4p
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or lr
animal waste discharged into waters ofthestate by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
sir^ila.r man-made dei ices? Yes or(N9► if Yes, Please Explain.
' << 5 the tactility inaintain adequate waste maciagernerit records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
N;
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Si azure
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

J:d_-1a-1995 15 = 26 FROM DEM WATER (;IUAL I TY SECT I UN TO
FIFO P . 02/02
Site Requires immediate Arcendon-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF-ENVIRONN ENTA.L MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrrE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 10 ~ 17 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner. fye !Q '� A-0 0 L- i2iyi fie.•--f" -- rr,4-9/-ce 41, j j -­/ ).- �_
Mailing Address:/
County: • J-o h st>v-,
Integrator. (�5 v 1 57 Vcv /4o Phone:
On Site Representative: r 1 � Phone:
Physical Add ess/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number. ACE DENT Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 �5 ' 1 '5 ' Longitude: �_• t ? ' _ 2 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficientfreeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Fooc + 7 inches) G or No Actual Freeboard: Fc. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagooti(s)? Yes or& Was any erosion observed? Yes oriED
Is adequate Laud available for spray? Ye or No is the cover crop adequate EYD or No
Crap(s) being utilized-
Does the facility -meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet. from Dwellings? &or No
loo Feet from Wells? Q or No
:.he a_^_imai waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line-Strzatn? Yes orro
animal waste land applied orspray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes o�
animal waste discharged into waters of a state by man-madeditch, flushing system, or other
,lir-flar man-made devices? Xe5 br1f Yes. Please:Explaitt.
tilt facility maintain adequate waste management .records (volumes of manure, Land appLicd_
5-pray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop,)? ( e or No
Additio Comments: 01-xol4� Off n 1 d" d.,63i"y,ec/ ru
i nS, � e 1�r0-j�_Li-,e,•- -", s fe 'ram ►-- syyqv r VE.K 4,09-r /4at. llti A••{/,,I.
` L V-S tom` 0 -t4v- S cl L OF t' e -CC klz-4v- L� a
J
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if i`+eeded.
Ti ,Tr.a 0 ih

3UL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires immediate Anendor-
Facility No. t ,S / 2
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 16 5 — 1995
Time: _
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator: 7r tiH seozymeg.e Phone: 7/g4o So,-j
On Site Representative: na:le -R ej- Phone: 11l1tz Vq y-7jz
Physical Address/Location: ffrci r ,maN�� lIQ LIP-- -r/i l d ( aFF �/oof �4my G,S
mffsr -ssa7 tygff of- 6PN���" ��TUvC1 f- fenia t-o C-1: Sh' IODc7
Type of Operation: Swine -V— Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2 :r W • Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: z • Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
stc wlr► �d.
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard: _fit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yesoro Was any erosion observed? Yes or to
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? & or No ;
Crop(s) being utilized: TrGssrs
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? C.5* or No
100 Feet from Wells? 9 or No well S*-1,
:.ice 2"Imal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ora
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue lane'? Yes or&
'; ani.mal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
-iiTnfllar man-made dei�ices? Yes or if Yws, Please Explain.
-)(,Cs tic facility maintain adequate waste nlattagemcrnt records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'' Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Si azure
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.b2

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 51 - 32
Facility Name: Eldridge Westbrook Farm
County: Johnston
Certified Operator Name: Eldridge Westbrook Operator #
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID):
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level(riches):'
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be ,pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Resources prior to transfer of
waste to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
r,
r
Facility
kIle, S 7 1 1�"jam'
ner/Manager (print)
Phone: qlf
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature
C Dept of Environmental Quality
PoA Cover Page 2/21/00 SEP 2 8 2018
Raleigh Regional Office

FICDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 23, 2010
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Rd
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates ,
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510032
Eldridge.Westbrook Farm
Animal Waste Management System .
Johnston County
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
The Division of Water. -Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on September
;.21., 2010: With the survey results, you requested.an, extension of.the sludge survey requirement
-for the- lagoon•at-theEldridge Westbro6k.,Farm facility: Duejo the -amount-of treatment -.volume-,
;.. available; the Division agrees that a,sludge survey is.not needed -until 2014 for your. lagoon.:
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at Eldridge Westbrook Farm' facility should be:performed .
.before December'31,1014..Thank you for your attention'to this matter. Please call me at'(91:9)>. :..
715-6937 if yoW have any questions.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office,'Aquifer Protection S
Permit File AWS510032
1636 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Intamrt: wvw.nrwaterrnialitv.nm
An cnn?I Onnorlimity ;;<;ttlrmativr., Action Emnlom
Sincerely,
;iiV
Miressa.D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
D E EJ V E
s=� z a 2010
INC DENR
Raleigh Region {lam
arohfia

Jahi 00 10 03:42p Julia Westbrook 919-934-7940 p.l
�� • � �� c`..�� �� �� r�. cam. tr ���
PW Q
0
A�-A

Jan' OR 10 03:43p Julia Westbrook 919-934-7940
7447 Jobe Road
Elm City, NC 27822
[phone]
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Fa -in Name and DWQ Identification Number: Westbrook Bros. DWQ#: 51-32
Lagoon Identification: Lagoon # 1
Measurements Taken By: Chad Pridgen
Data; of Sludge Survey: 09/08/09
Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
Plastic round disc connected to an aluminum pipe
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon:
I inch PVC pipe with end cap
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
N/A
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank):
1.68 Acres
p.2
Distance from top of bank to Maximum Liquid Level (Taken from plan or other lagoon records): 1.7 Ft (tenths)
Estimated number a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
ofsampling points: b. If more than 1.33 acres: 1 1.68 acres x 6= 10 , with maximum of 24.
After survey is conducted all data is recorded on "The Sludge Survey Data Sheet." At the time of the survey, a measurement
is a] w taken at the current location of the pump intake_ This data is also recorded on "The Sludge Survey Data Sheet" at the
bottom of the table in the "At Pump Intake" box. Note: This depth should beat least 2.5 feet when irrigating.
At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the
Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole):
Delermine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
Distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
la-Oon bottom (average for all the measurement points):
Record from Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
Record from Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
0.7 Ft (tenths)
2 3 Ft (tenths)
1.6 Ft (tenths)
10.50 Ft (tenths)
9.39 Ft (tenths)
1. 111 Ft (tenths)
Cal �.ulate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone: (If equal to or greater than sludge F 7.79 Ft (tenths)
la,Y or thickness, volume determination not needed. If not equal to or greater than sludge layer thickness
volumes will be calculated and listed on "The Sludge Survey Volume Worksheet".)_
Survey Performed By: Chad Pridgen
i Surveyor Name
09/08/09
Date Completed

Jari 08 10 03:43p Julia Westbrook 919-934-7940 p.3
PS■
7447 Jobe Road
Elm City, NC 27822
[phone]
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Name and DWQ Identification Number: Westbrook Bros. DWQ#: 51-32
Lagoon Identification: Lagoon k 1
Mcasurem ents Taken By: Chad Pridgen
Data of Sludge Survey: 09/08/0.
Gric. Point
Number
Distance from liquid
surface to top of sludge
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
Thickness of sludge
layer
Feet (tenths)
Feet (tenths)
Feet (tenths)
1
8.7
10.5
1.8
2
9
10.5
1.5
3
9.2
10.5
1.3
4
9.4
10.5
1.1
5
9.8
10.5
0.7
6
9
10.5
1.5
7
9.4
10.5
1.1
8
9.6
10.5
0.9
_9
9.8
10.5
0.7
--'10
10
10.5
0.
!.2
1.3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2:2
2:3
2.4
Average
9.39 Ft (tenths)
10.50 Ft (tenths)
1.11 Ft (tenths)
At (hump Intake: 8.6 Ft (tenths)

3f
0
0
smeo I 'I
e 0 t
51-32
. w W W
13U I L D IN (r5
2-001FT

PSG F
7447 Jobe Road
Elm City, NC 27822
[phone]
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Name and DWQ Identification Number:
Lagoon identification:
Measurements Taken By:
Date of Sludge Survey:
Westbrook Bros. DWQ#: 51-32
Lagoon # 1
Chad Pridgen
�2/04/08
Grid Point
Number
Distance from liquid
surface to top of sludge
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
Thickness of sludge.
layer
Feet tenths
Feet tenths
_
Feet tenths
1
9.2
10.3
1.1
2
9
10.3
1.3
3
8.5
10.3
1.8
4
7.2
10.3
5
9.5
10.3
0.8
6
9.5
10.3
0.8
7
7.2
10.3
_
3.1
8
8.5
10.3
-
1.8
9
9.2
10.3
1.1
10
9.2
10.3
1.1
11
_
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
_
Average 1
8.70 Ft (tenths)
10.30 Ft (tenths)
1.60 Ft (-te:nths)
S'd Otr6L-bE6-616 -400jgjs9M eilnr dEb:EO 01 BO Uer

7447 Jobe Road
Elm City, NC 27822
[phone]
Sludge Survey Volume Worksheet
Farm Name and DWQ Identification Number:
Lagoon Identification:
Measurements Taken By:
Date of Sludge Survey:
Westbrook Bros. DWQ#: 51-32
Lagoon # I
Chad Pridgen
12/04/08
Average Sludge Layer Thickness
Depth of lagoon from top of bank to bottom soil surface
Slope = horizontal/vertical side slope
Length at top inside bank
Width at top inside bank
Length at midpoint of sludge layer
Width at midpoint of sludge layer
Volume of sludge
Volume in gallons
I.60
12.80
Ft (tenths)
Ft (tenth )
3
365.00
Feet
200.00
Feet
293
Feet
128.00
Feet
60,006
Ft.3
450,048
Gal
9 - d Ot,6L—i,E6-6 16 . :,{oojg4saO e i i nr dtrtr : EO 01 80 Uer

PS@:,�.,,;
7447 Jobe Road
Elm City, NC
[phone]
Irrigation Equipment Calibration Form
Farm Name:
Location:
Date of Field Calibration:
Projected Date of Next Calibration
Flow Meter Serial Number:
Equipment Number:
Measured Nozzle size:
Westbrook Bros.
Westbrook Bros
12/04/08
12/04/ 10
M048673302
Serial # 6100009325OWB
1.08 Ring Nozzle inches
��--Is nozzle size within 0.011" of on inaall manufactured size?
I J Yes or LJNo. If not replace nozzle.
Pressure Gauge Readings At Pump:
At Traveler.
At Sprinkler/Gun:
Expected Flow Rate (from manufacturers chart):
Measured Flow Rate (from flow meter):
Flow rate variance greater than 10%
Expected Wetted Diameter (from manufacturers chart):
Measured Wetted Diameter:
100 psi
96 psi
70 psi
197 GPM
196.8 GPM
� ---�
Yes NoL;.—J
310 ft.
292 ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15% &/or measured flow variance greater than
10%: Yes NoIf Yes, then contact a technical specialist
or irrigation dealer for assistance.
Explanation of Findings:
Flow rate was within 10% Flow rate was 99%
Wetted diameter was within 15% Wetted diameter was 94%
Calibrator's Signature:
_4-
L'd 0tI6G-t1E6-616 -,{ooUggsaO eitnr dSb:EO 01 BO Uer

WASTE SAMPLE INFORMATION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
a
SAMPtE' YPl '(cirelef ne / see instructions)
RED^^4
x a
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Plant/Waste/Solution Section
`Waste Analysis
- 4
MailingAddress: 1040MailService Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1040Physical
pResearch
Address (UPS/FedEx): 4300 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh NC 27607
D:i05023$12
°7
.. Out of State_ $25
( )...:........... ..� ....)
Phone: [phone] Web Address: www.ncagr.com/agronomi
Pi ac
-
GROWER INFORMATION (please print)yX
-
PAYMENT aEg saiaar E N C residents $5 Out of state $25;.
research $12 :+ $ ea exfra test (N raw MernLs cce}
LAST. NAME FIRST NAME :: PHONE :
CONSI�LT
OTHER RECIPIENT PHONE
Make check or oney r payable to N CDA&C
No Samples Check ( j
_
—
S
ADD-
AD . ESS
Payment
C (,jw
1✓ i�
q
Money Order
Escrow :: Cas (:
Account
...
C1TY' STATE Z1P COD
CITY
STATE
ZIP CODE
��s�y
T-�Zs�
r, jr? ji ,.
COUNTY (sAMPLEs aRE FROM)
GROVIIER E MAIL . ,
FARM .ID
OTHER RECIPIENT E-MAIL
SAMPLED BY W DATE^�
G
0
N
a
m
>ti
0
a
LL
LAB NUMBER WASTE APPLICATION CORRESPONDING SAMPLE 1D
EXTRA TEM ($10)
LAB USE ONLY
(leave blank) SAMPLE ID CODE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION >+ COMMENTS METHODS SOIL PLANT SOLUTION
N$ Heavy
cCE
pH EC C
i
HOW TO FILL OUT -THE INFORMATION SHEET (provide all information requested in shaded areas)
APPLICATION METHODS
SAMPLE TOE— Predictive (base fee $5 for N.C. residents) analysis checks nutrient content and provides interpretation and general recommendations.
BR = Waste broadcast on soil
Diagnostic (base fee $5 for N.C. residents) analysis identifies nutritional problems and provides interpretation and -specific recommendations.
surface and left uncovered for
Research (base.fee $12) is for samples submitted in connection with an approved research contract agreement.
one week or longer
Out ofstate (base fee $25) is for samples submitted by non -North Carolina residents,
SI = Waste broadcast onsoil
GROWER INFORMATION — Provide as much contact information as possible (phone with area code, address, e-mail) and area where sample was collected.
surface and plowed or disked
PAYMENT — Calculate total fee based on sample type, number df samples and additional. tests. Indicate method of payment-
into soil within two days
SAMPLE ID —Provide sample identification (no more than six digits or letters), Put the same ID on the sample container.
IN = Waste injected directiy into the
WASTE CODE - Identify the type of waste in the sample by using codes (see back of information sheet).
soil and covered immediately
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION / COMMENTS ----w Briefly describe problem or reason for sampling 4necessary for diagnostic samples).
APPLICATION METHODS — Select one or two application methods from the list at the right for estimation of nutrient availability,
IR = Waste applied through
irrigation system and left
CORRESPONDING SAMPLE ID— List thetDsofany Matching soil,.plant orsolution samples submitted.
uncovered for one week or
EXTRA TESTS — Indicate any nonstandard tests desired: nitrogen breakout (nitrate & ammonium), heavy metals and calcium carbonate equivalence.
longer

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 r
Eldridge T Westbrook
iUN
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Rd -- _—
Four Oaks, NC 27524-9785 ! l�N REGiO;?;,L CFFIG1
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510032
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Eldridge T Westbrook:
In accordance with your application received on 22-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Eldridge T Westbrook, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Eldridge Westbrook Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 2880 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 1I1.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as. specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pa_y
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
None Carolina
Ntumlly
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .011 l (c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS510032

-F, I (';t A)C) . �l - �
g � � BPS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc.
Tuesday, November 28, 2000
Producer: Eldridge Westbrook
Farm Name:
Telephone # :
Type of Operation :
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Road
Four Oaks,NC 27524
[phone]
Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals : 2880 hogs design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
EU i� I JAN 2 4 2007 j
i { i
DENR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICF
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltratiori rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally
waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5.tons per acre per year. With
special pre -cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under
DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through
irrigation for this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose
to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting
waste and irrigating waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES. LBS AW APPLIC.
_ DETERMINING PHASE CODE NACRE NACRE USED TIME
515
1
WAGRAM 0-6%
BH
5.5
5
0
3.4
885.5
MAR-OCT
515
1
WAGRAM 0.6% S
SG
1
0
3.22
161
SEP-APR
11824
10
NORFOLKO-2% pr
C
110
137.5
0
5.73
787.875
MAR-JUN
11824
10
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
60
144
0
5.73
825.12
SEP-APR
11824
10
NORFOLK 0-2% 1
SB
40
1
0
5.73
916.8
APR-SEP 15
11824
10
NORFOLK O-2% Cb Ol
c0
7
0
5.73
481.32
APR-AUG
11824
11
NORFOLK 0-2%
C
110
137.5
0
5.23
719.125
MAR-JUN
11824
11
NORFOLKO-2% f--
W
60
144
0
5.23
753.12
SEP-APR
11824
11
NORFOLK 0-2%
SB
401
160
0
5.23
836.8
APR-SEP 15
11824
11
NORFOLK 0-2% Cp 011/
CO
700
84
0
5.23
439.32
APR-AUG
11824
12
INORFOLK 0-2%
c
110
137.5
0
4.8
660
MAR-JUN
11824
* 12
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
60
144
0
4.8
691.2
SEP-APR
11824
12
NORFOLKO-2% so Rmw S
SB
40
160
0
4.8
768
APR-SEP 15
11824
12
NORFOLK 0-2%
c0
700
84
0
4.8
403.2
APR-AUG
515
2
NORFOLK 0-2% V, �,�
C
110
137.5
0
4.65
639.375
MAR-JUN
515
2
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
60
144
0
4.65
669.6
SEP-APR
515
2
INORFOLK 0-2%
CO
700
84
0
4.65
390.6
APR-AUG
515
2
INORFOLK 0-2%
SB
40
160
0
4.65
744
APR-SEP 15
515
3
INORFOLK 0-2%
110
137.5
0
4.65
639.375
MAR-JUN
515
3 INORFOLK
0-2%
W
60
144
0
4.65
669.6
SEP-APR
515
' 3 INORFOLK
0-2%
SB
40
160
0
4.65
744
APR-SEP 15
515
3
NORFOLKO-2%
CO
700
84
0
4.65
390.6
APR-AUG
515
4
NORFOLK 0-2%
M
110
137.5
0
6.82
937.75
MAR-JUN
515
4
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
60
144
0
6.82
982.08
SEP-APR
515
4
NORFOLK 0-2%
SB
40
160
0
6.82
1091.2
APR-SEP 15
515
• 4
NORFOLK 0-2%
c0
700
84
0
6.82
572.68
APR-AUG
515
5
NORFOLK 0-2%
C
110
137.5
0
6.61
908.875
MAR-JUN
515
5
NORFOLKO-2%
W
60
1
0
6.61
951.84
SEP-APR
515
' 5
NORFOLKO-2%
SB
40
160
0
6.61
1057.6
APR-SEP 15
515
' 5
NORFOLK 0-2% C&Tro
CO
700
84
0
6.61
555.2
APR-AUG
8507
6
NORFOLK 0-2% & S L
BC
5.
2
0
1.55
403
MAR-OCT
8507
6
NORFOLK 0-2% «
SG
1
50
0
1.55
77.5
SEP-APR
8507
7
NORFOLKO-2% pprjAL-,
BC
5.
260
0
4.41
1146.6
MAR-OCT
8507
7
NORFOLKO-2%
SG
1
50
0
4.41
220.5
SEP-APR
8507
8
RAINS c
FC
3.8
190
01
5.27
1001.3
SEP-MAY
8507
9
RAINS tja*g
FC
3.8
190
J 01
A.31
818.9
SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 14827.6
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
" Indicates a Crop Rotation
Page 2

NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 3

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEAS
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
.� (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
Indicates a Crop Rotation
Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
"" Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS N/UNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
CO
COTTON
POUNDS
0.12
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
'50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
FC
TALL FESCUE -CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
Page 4

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND
ACRESV14,828
TABLE 1 57.25TOTALS. 57,26
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED. 6,624
—BALANCE -8,204
*** This number mustbe less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste
N produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres
excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and
perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 0 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be
removed on the average of once every 0 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 0 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (iNhr) AMT (inches)
11824
•to,•tt,•t2
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
0.50
'1
11824
NORFOLK 0-2%
SB
0.50
•1
11824
•to,•n,•t2
NORFOLKO-2%
CO
0.50
'1
11824
NORFOLK 0-2%
C
0.50
"1
515
WAGRAM 0-6%
SG
0.60
'1
515
WAGRAM 0.6%
BH
0.60
'1
515
•z, •3, •4. •5
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
0.50
'1
515
•z, •3, •4, •5
NORFOLK 0-2%
SB
0.50
'1
515
02, •3, •4. •5
NORFOLK 0-2%
CO
0.50
'1
515
02, •3. •4, •5
INORFOLK 0-2%
C
0.50
'1
8507
8,9
RAINS
FC
0.40
'1
8507
-6.-7
NORFOLKO-2%
SG
1 0.50
1 '1
Page 5

8507 1 6. 7 NORFOLK 0-2% 1 BC 1 0.50 -1
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen all for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
^, amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 6

OPERATION The irrigation hydrants were Pre-
PIARRATIVE Of OPERA from the original
pulls on wettable acres • The soil types
imgation p measurements. ation pulls are drawn to
This WUp is written by actual field m The irri9
w6siting and were located by Cp�NRCS wefe utilized. the NUP• ears. In
Johnston SW a map to match
WUp written by d b 2627.50
Y
1„=660') and located and labeled on the N deficit will be reduce Y
scale 10 acres of toba
cco rotated auoss TractsA 15 and 11824 eve
There are 9- is lanted on either tract, the p p 1bs of PAN will need
a pAN deficit of-5576.05• rotation, 2
the event that tobacco P beans in the crop bean crop.
(COmputed on 10 acres), With the soy
In the event that com or cotton follows soy
ed from LBS AW NIACRE for residual N from
to be deduct
page 7

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by.runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a
copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use -of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff
leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See
FOTG Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a
season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
'7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
Page 8

component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways. .
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or
drift from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or
discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained: Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
" Liquid Systems
Page 10

NAME OF FARM: Eldridge Westbrook Farm
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
utilization plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are
stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation
equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This
equipment must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs
from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied
on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: Eldridge Westbrook
SIGNATURE: r044 �f��,ZlDATE: T 30. a e2aeD
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: George H. Pettus
AFFILIATION: Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc.
ADDRESS (AGENCY): PO Box 10009
Goldsboro, NC 27532
[phone]
SIGNATURE: DATE: 30 NOV 00
Page 11

3IG GUNS'
PERFORMANCE TABLES
U.S.
U N I i �i
►0 SERIES BIG GUNS - 24' TRAJECTORY"
0 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
RS.1.
50
70
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
50 205'
60 225'
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
64 215,
75 238,
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
74 225•
88 250'
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
87 235'
103 263'
Nozzle
GPM OIA.
100 245'
120 275'
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
115 256'
136 283'
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
130 265'
155 295'
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
160 273'
177 302
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
165 280'
204 300'
197
31n'
tea suI
90
68 2a5'
63 258,
100 270'
117 283'
1 135 295'
155 306'
175
315'
201 326'
223 335'
274 362'
110
1 76 265'
1 92 278'
111 290'
1 129 303'
1 150 315'
171 324'
1 195
335'
1 222 344'
1 247 355'
1 304 380'
Available only with F100 8 SR100.
100 R RING NOZZLES
100 DN DIFFUSER NOZZLES
PSI
.71 RING
77 RING
81 RING
66 RING
.89 RING
.93 RING
96 RING
0.5 ON
0.8 ON
0.7 ON
0.8ON
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
c�i iii�iL•Li� �ct'>•�r•
"The diameter of throw Is approximately 3%less for the 21' trajectory angle, 6% less for Mr..
150 SERIES BIG GUNS' -- 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
150 K HINU NUZZLt5
RiT!
Ring
GPM
DIA.
+cr _.pKx
GPM
r7•-. -
DIA.
trr�
�i`I� f'.-' t�'
%
,,('
1} Y
� l
I L
1
•iC {
�J 1 •1e
�..
1
lx
J
M '
-
rl r-
_r
1F ^n
'.L t t
F/] F;
}
.ii
�.+b:t. ��.
t L�.
�.f�,..}��M
KI+d.N
uw;t� Y�7i
h _
1
r(411
/
I"(..�.?r.�SfI
��
.•_Si{l+ ,..r...
d .•l't:.
:^]IrY°.....
.�... .1:...iY' _�'n.
.
ir.. �T'i.�facC
l«::,.niK^..........1
1
1i11�F'�..
.�...[�f •:.�1:.�Ix
.. y..
m.. .:
T--...�.,uS.l�Z✓::
Y__.F..M'?I
200 SERIES BIG .GUNS -- 270 TRAJECTORY"
2011 T TAPER 90RE NOZZLES
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
1.05'
1.1.
1.2"
1.3"
1.4'
IS"
1.6'
1.75"
19"
P.S.I.
GPM DIA.
GPM
DIA.
GPM
OW
GPM
DNA,
GPM
DIA.
GPM
DIA.
GPM
DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM
OIA.
70
270 360'
310
380'
355
395'
415
410'
480
430'
$55
450'
630
465'
755 495'
890
515•
90
310 390,
350
410'
405
425'
475
445'
545
465'
625
485'
715
505'
855 535'
1005
655,
;130
340 410'
390
430'
445
450'
525
470'
605
495'
695
515'
945 585'
1110
590'
790 535'
370 425'
425
445'
485
465
565
465'
1 655
515'
1 755
540'
1 860
560'
1025 590'
1210
620'
200 R RING NOZZLES
"The diameter of throw is approximately 2% less for the 24" trajectory angle, 5% less for the 21° trajectory angle.
The BIG GUN$ performance data has been obtained under ideal lest conditions and may be adversely affected by wind, poor hydraulic entrance conditions or other factors.
-- —.___ ••••1..... Winatien Po rporation makes no representation regarding droplet condition, uniformity, or application rate.

Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Eldridge Westbrook
Effective width = 240
Wetted diameter = 300
Nozzle size = 1.08
Operating pressure c@ gun = 60
Total acres covered with traveler (wettable) _
Hydrant Number
Tract 515
1
2
3
4
5
Tract 8507
6
7
8
9
n
Tract 11824
10
11
12
Effective length
520
750
750
1100
150
950
57.25
Effective Width
270
270
270
270
210
270
500 �' �j�/,40-7--7
0 1 135
800 Cuas�+� aL��`240
850 l`4s ak 6oiA 270
250 ra e A p'�%� 210
500 irs&a 270
Acres
3.22
4.65
4.65
6.82
0.72
5.89
1.55
4.41
5.27
1.21
3.10
925 270 5.73
950 240 5.23
950 220 4.80
Total 57.26

1 6
r:, r t .- � '": h- 1a J qg+r � t t,•tJ rV
� c ' 17 t c`• 7 r
c t rvC
phie �
t
Y ..'
J M.
r�
rI.
S✓+.} yak J�� ! t,:r��¢ � r�S .b� Y�:'h �.,Lc i t -
.ti rx t s t 7 .4j
4 Jj)
� � J
`• �iSy y � t7
MOTist i„.'I a t i•'. _,J }� L IF ti 3nyx •�.r�.lrit i"} .aJ' `
5e I Ic 6all.
i
4<J Aw7^a
ir
r J
tr 5 r J a s4 i h5 7`.7 ri r- J 'spa^

ANIX-AT WASTE HAHAG `E.SENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED PEP LOTS
Please retu--a the completed fora to the Division of Environmental management at
the addresa on the reverse aide of this fgr�.II
Name of farm P �+se pr
Address: 7 .5�c e,
Phone No.: -
County: a An5 v?
Farm location: Latitude and Long itude:]��ZR_ j9' IM (required) Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identif'ed.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) -
Design capacity (number of animals): : D
Average size of operation'(12 month population ayg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):,,,_
a..ao==ac=aa=a.aaaaaaaa=nnaaaan=ass.aasasaaaaaaaaaaaaaa3a=aaaxaa=a==oaa=seen
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for -the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,.
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elemepts and their corresponding minimum
criteria -have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity;,adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater.runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Jame of Technical S ecia]j at (Please Print) : �� r/ S ZZ) 57,
Affiliation G j
Address (Agency); QPhone No. - S
Signature: rZj*,.. GfZi dV Date: P_
=aaa=annna=n=naaaaaacasaaaaaQa:sasassanaaasaaaaaeaanaaa az naaaaaxnaa
Owner/Hanager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. .I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Name of Hanacer, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW##
live- 0oc� loo�cc/ `7�hi5 UJ11e j r- Ie �� G 11f ! e /7�H�

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production fil - Vegetative or wooded buffers;
0 Recommended best management practices;
® Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces • Dirty manure -covered animals 0 Dry floors
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors ® Slotted floors;
JS Waterers located over slotted floors;
O Feeders at high end of solid floors;
O Scrape manure buildup from floors;
O Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; O Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• - Partial microbial decomposition or scrape;
O Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; ® Fan maintenance;
Dust 0 Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
• Dust
A
Washdown between groups of animals;
®
Feed additives;
O
Feeder covers;
8
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
cwrers
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
O
Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
O
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
• Agitation during wastewater
O
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
JO
Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
O
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance

Source Cause 6,4s- to Minimize Oddr Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater p Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces . Volatile gas emissions; ® Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing;
• Agitation
9 Correct lagoon startup procedures;
a Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
0 Minimum agitation when.pumping;
O Mechanical aeration;
O Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; IW Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind. -
nozzles . Wind drill 9 Minimum recommended operating pressure;
® Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
O Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; O Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface Mixing while filling; O Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying O Basin surface mats of solids;
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface • Partial microbial decomposition; O Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
• Mixing while filling; level;
• Agitation when emptying O Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading; O Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets . Volatile gas emissions O Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on Feld drying O Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
surfaces
O Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition I$ Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition O Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits O Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators • Incomplete combustion O Secondary stack burners
., -- 10 . ....... 1"r 11 1()o6. Pif e 4

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; IN Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information:
Available From :
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
NC Pork -Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause RM1 s to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids ® Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30'Y• of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation @► Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
• : Feed Spillage O Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
13 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer,15-30 day interval
Feed Storaee • Accumulations of feed residues O Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids
O Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids
® Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation
q Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
• : Feed Spillage
O Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
1% Cleanup spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 -10
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Storage • Accumulations of feed residues O Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.

Source Cause BNM to Control Insects• Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes O
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
O
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding area to minimize
accumulations of wastes (Le., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes O
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
O
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
O
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
O Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
® Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
C� Complete incineration
13 In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a. size and. design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
® Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

Ua.pa.v, vl I Vul tit ♦ 41 01111a
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTTF.TED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Road
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 1, 2000
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Facility Number 51-32
Johnston County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not.be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by John Hunt on 4/8/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility that
receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the following
two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing John Hunt the necessary information
to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre determination.
Please submit this information to John Hunt, at 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609,
within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any questions please contact John
Hunt at [phone]. ff within 90 days you are unable to provide John Hunt with the
information you are automatically required to complete a Wettable Acre
Determination as described by Category 2 below, within 180 days of receipt of this
letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form.' Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility: 1;LWI &F WaTVAewl< FOvtm Facility Number: 61 - 3Z
Owner(s) Name:ywR19ft W"rBFook Phone No: g111-g34-71014
Mailinia Address: tq°I 5callerV_VAV r-abMakk5, N16 Z-76-24
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name: GL�r.rvGE WESr$RoOIC
Owner Signature:_ -Date:
Technical Specialist Name: P&MU5
Technical Specialist Signature: Date: 28 NO✓b0
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature: Date:
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
NC Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
WALK - 7/99

W A 7-F9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
tom- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 7, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7002 2410 0003 0274 6419
Mr. Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farms
199 Scout Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
RE: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Facility # 51-32
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Westbrook:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your survey information on February 28,
2005. With your results you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for the
lagoons at the Godwin Farm until 2007. Due to the amount of treatment volume available, DWQ
agrees that a sludge survey extension is not needed until 2007. The results of the 2007 sludge
survey are to be submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due on March 1,
2008.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File# 51-32
John Hunt, Raleigh Regional Office
One
NPNaCaro ina
turally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmalive Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

W. Britt Cobb, Jr.
Interim Commissioner
N. David Smith
Deputy Commissioner
June 24, 2003
Westbook Brothers
Eldridge Westbrook
199 Scout Rd
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Mr. Westbrook,
QTurnlinn
,BPjjttrtment of &AViW u T
nub &msu=rSjervirrs
<�nmir pivisinn
Jim Cummings
Assistant Commissioner
Dr. Richard C. Reich
Director
UUN 2 6 2003
II!
I
This letter is in reference to my site visit on Tuesday, June 24, 2003 to your Swine Facility (51-32) in
regards to extend your application window onto your cornfields (pull 10,11, & 12). It is in my
professional .opinion that this corn which was planted April 19 & 20, 2003 and is only 6 to 7 feet tall, is
well within the application window to fully utilize applied Nitrogen. This corn is about 1 week from
tasselling, and I recommend that the application window be extended an additional 2 weeks beyond the
June 30 application window. This corn is about 2 to 3 weeks behind the maturity of corn planted at the
recommended planting dates. This letter recommends extending nitrogen applications, but not to exceed
nitrogen allowed by Waste Management Plan.
Best regards,
Kevin E. Johnson
Regional Agronomist
NCDA & CS
P. O. Box 890 Certified Professional Agronomist
Pikeville, NC 27863 CCA
Cc: George Pettus
Buster Towell
4300 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh North Carolina 27607-6465
[phone] 0 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

0� w A rF Michael F. Easley, Governor
a
Q , William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural. Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Road
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA251032
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on January 27, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Eldridge Westbrook, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES
General Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS510032 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Eldridge Westbrook.Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than an annual average of 2880 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007.-. Pursuant. to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the` conditions 'and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days followingreceipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March Ist of each year.
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR,122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
if you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Cl 2 ra I n " /7 r= Sincerely,
u v L5
APR 2 3 2003
DENR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
for Alan W. Klimek, P:E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA251032
Permit File AWS510032
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Road
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
F 11
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 ti R ;
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping .�
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number61�32--'
John's on County.
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

r JAN 06 '00 03:11PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX
P.3/4
Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. If this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so.
2. Temporary Addition of Ne:w Sprayfields *) (ebeck appropriate -boxes.) -
0 A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
0 B. acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
0 C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN / acre added.
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
. Application window extended for acres of perennia[ grass until fast killing frost.
j . An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to 4 acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to grof
ested. (Check appropriate box.) �a yA. PAN application increased up to 2001bs per acre for small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for _? acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
S. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
0 A. Prior to December 1,-1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reductiorrof the last analysis taken
]1Bfor to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.1 .)
. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter, Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Required - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
S. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number S - Z_
:c., 7'e.6"fd,e X,0.4 S
Facility Owner / Manager Name (PRINT
Xle
Facility Owner / Manager Signature
Facility Name
C-vip� N. ekme,
Technical Specialist Name (PRINT)
hn al Specialist Signature
Date /� - a f — _ Date 2A nIDV �t�i
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(") New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
11/11/1999

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
March 26, 1999
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
A ILFFMA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510032
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
In accordance with your application received on September 14, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Eldridge Westbrook, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment,, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Eldridge Westbrook Farm, located in Johnston County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 2880 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and.limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510032
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Page 2
I1 any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sinc y,
G � .
,, Derr T. Stevens
ct : (Certificate of Coverage only fur all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
-� cRaleigh=RegionaF ffice, Water -Quality -Section
Johnston-County-Soil=and_Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
�t
lJUl MAR
� I999
------------
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICEf

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 30, 1998
Subject: Application No. AWS510032
Additional Information Request
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by December 30, 1998:
1. Please submit an Insect Control Checklist, an Odor Control Checklist and a Mortality
Management Checklist. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented
at this facility should be identified (check the appropriate BMPs) on the Insect Control
Checklist and on the Odor Control Checklist.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before December 30,
1998 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-50 3_ extension 502.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Si cerely,
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 31, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN MUM REQUESTED
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Farm Number: 51- 32
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
r1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NASURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Eldridge Westbrook Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC,
must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,
your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting docilmentation. In
accordance with hapter 26 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for estop oei."P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` XTI.MWA 0
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor PEEHNF;Z
Jonathan B, Howes, SecretaryDivision of Soil and Water Conse
June 20, 1997
Eldridge Westbrook
199 Scout Rd.
Four Oaks, NC 27524 C
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary
Westbrook Bros. Swine Farm Facility No. 51-32 �VN 23051
Johnson County
Dear Mr. Westbrook, pENNR RpLE\�N REG
On June 19, an Operation Review was conducted of Westbrook Bros. Farm, facility no. 51-32. This
Review, undertaiten in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered
livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site
inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information.
The following observations were discovered and noted for response. This was not required at the
time of review but in preparation for the upcoming general permit, you will need to secure and maintain the
following records on your farm: an Operation and Maintenance Plan for the waste management system and
insect, odor and mortality checklists.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
a��
Marga t O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Johnson Soil and Water Conservation District
George Pettis, Goldsboro Hog Farms
Judy_Garrett, Wa: e`r-Quality Regional -Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, � FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%44FC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Choi rl e- rl e r 3 _ /Vo ul EIa ,-; Jj e— e s �-,brc v/�
ANTM=r. WASTE Y:.NACMfZ!M PLAN C3RT=FICAT=O_'7 FOR NEW OR =.PMMZD FEEDLOTS
Please retu--n the cc:..pleted fo^ to the Divisica of Ervirc=aatal I'..a :agameat at
the add=eaa on the raverae aide of this f-^
r c 1Cr5
Name of farm Please print) i'CC
Address: SV� .Sc cu_� R�d
Phone No.:
County: `'�
Fa--= location: Latitude and Longitude: 5-`LQ�/S'� / ` [�'�� (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
--Tyre of operation (swine, laye_T, dairy, etc.): w;1-
Design capacity (nuzi^er of animals)
Average size of operation-(12 month population avg.): 81
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres)t
- - - - - - - - - - - a - �� 3 C C a - � S� a �� - 3 � - - -•-•� C - a - = a a i = - - � - - 3 3 � 3 �� - 3 a � a�� i a = c a - a a a - � -. a
Tec'...r ical specialist ce_^tificatiou
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
n_
expanded air= -'al waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following e1 events and their corresponding minimum
criteria-hav-e_heen verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buff e_rs); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity;ladequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical S ecialjat (Please Print) : �a7r/ 3 Z% S/h///
Affiliation:__ 3
Address (Agency) Phone No. VY- S
Signature:_rr L��VZ Date: 0/6uk
=eca=aaaaaaa==aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas:aaasaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaaa3 -aa=aasaanaaa
Owner/Hanager Agreeaeat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District_
Kama of Load Owner (Please
—Prriintt) :r
Date:
Nase of vanagar, if different from owner (Please print):
l�
Signature: Date:
"Tote: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW#
GVC OVC� /DdKGG //7/S �%`iC'� /^0 �r�L G� �'/•17 � /J`y��

Ncr; 1 C.:;ciinc
Dccc, ileni O _nvircnmem1r,
Hiecifn c�c Nc;urc: <�scurc�s
-CnC.� C^ EC 'c. �CwS. 5eC-a-,- ,
A. ✓irEC'Cr
ADDENDUM
CONDITIONS AtiD/O�J�j EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFICATION
-Bi T c 'h c /'S
Name of Far---: /r-�a llh Q tea.rrri
_ %. _
Ace+ +r=: [� y �' c' Re) u � f c «r cc, Co=rv:
Name of Land Owner (print):
Signamre (Land
Name of Technic:.l Specrl;r, Ce.-dryi Z Sprint):
Signanire (Tec-Imic:l Specialist):
Date:
All satements below that ar` initialled by a rzct:dc--1 specialist a=lv to the anar-hed ce.:incadom
The irrigation system hrs not been installed or evaluated cone .-ping norie size, sprav patrrm,
spacing, pipe size, etc. It is the responsibiliry of the produce: to obtain and operate the
system with the proper components and to supply the required maintenance to assure that no
runoff of polluranrs occars during operation and that the wasr.e is appiied at the approved rates.
By (month day/year) the produce.- should have an irrigation specadm. possibly .
the dealer where the system was purchased. prepare an operation and mainter=ce plan for
the irrigation system so char the producer knows how to open= the e=Dment to meet the
non -discharge requi=ents.
j�The waste management plan for this operation is based on yields higher than whar is now
commended by MRCS: however, these yields are obtainable under high levels of
maaag=ear and the farmer has supporting docamennnon to justify higher niurogez
application tares.
All of L`ce petmanenr vegemnon re„^uir--d by the wasrr manageanent plan has not be=
esabiished as of the of 2 is crrrLricamon. '1te producer ag:-..es m es-mblish tte
vegeWden by (month/day/year), and to provide a =pera v amen gim. n =p it.
case some o :ng is —uim prior to the -e/st: c -ent or Lte per--anenr ve7t=cn_
/blofzv /Yas jee.rbal.
The landowner is resimn ble rer neritytng DE1d in writing t.,at the =md work tt s t ia cGmDiiance
dare has bey comvl •err.:. ibis notification must be r-..w-=ved by DE'1i wiL:in 15 drys of tf:e
campiiaacr d=--,:s) lie- above. P'e= s=.d veriflf en of the prom-iy cz pier_-,' work te: DEM
Flaaaing Br.,nct. P.O. Box =.9535. F le ziL N.0 :: 625. /
P.C.:cx 5,35. Rcersn. Ncr-m C=ciinc'2 626-05 .5
An Cr--zcrrt:r.rtv A—rrr.^.ve Acncn =^_:ever
Card he je s� a feem,,f
rr rise • 6-15-95 J.
d `Y
7e4ec^cneCiC..7,...-7-15
5 4recvicec:
. /,

� 1 � i� • ��' .J � �, �;I ' �( �- ,,; ���� , � 1, �\\.. ., � , ��,
� � • � `" r L. - .) .- .-� `1 /v/� °' • 1. �.. -.,- �\ � i � n�� �� 1, �• �l`-=i-=: i 1 � � / ",
szu
ij
I wts
IV
_fitc Iv
7)1
�l
�"` � c. ^� \ � i � r') 1. - ��`.I \ `�� y .� I�-\•\ 6 � � •'1 .. l I I
\\ I Y. 1 • \`1 \. rIl ` ./.I
All
A-:4-RIZ,
CD
N J cn 1+1 O
cn o n
i N w O o
o n

SO I
07.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Eldridge Westbrook
Eldridge Westbrook Farm
199 Scout Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Farm Number: 51 - 32
Dear Eldridge Westbrook:
Iffl?W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 31, 1998 RECEIVED
!!LATER ( IA-t iiY SEC i ION
SEP 1 4 1998
Non-DisOiarge Permitting
You are hereby notified that Eldridge Westbrook Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC,
must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,
your farm has six 60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter C27.6 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for eston /6ewe,i.j.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

n
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources RECEIVED
Division of Water Quality WATER QjAL 1TygECTiON
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 1998
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) ' SEP 1 4
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Ope Non iocharge Permitting
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Eldridge Westbrook Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Eldridge Westbrook
1.3 Mailing address: 199 Scout Rd
City, State:
Four Oaks NC
Zip: 27524
Telephone Number include area code): 34-ate
p C ) 919 — 93V— 719
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 1008, between SR 1009 and SR H 94. UT Hannah
Creek.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Goldsboro
1.8 'Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 06/22/94
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _51_ (county number); _32 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Fir to Finish
2880- Certified Design Capacity
Farms
Is the above information correct? = yes; Fno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 1 of 4 51 - 32

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
63'- Aems
system): 4+90- ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): -i8- 41641
2.4 Number lagoons storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES o NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
0 or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 10-4r3
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included tha following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 2 of 4 51- 32

RECEIVED
\NWI ER Q IN,1.17Y GF-C710N
Facility Number: 51 - 32 1 4199a
Facility Name: Eldridge Westbrook Farm S�p
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: Non -Discharge Permitting
E4tVT_1V S WG�f61ZOdk (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for E&VwVGE w05T*Ra9k l::Aiz + (Facility name listed in question L I )
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date q ,"T- p8
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if ail required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51 - 32

w'as /-ra4K4- ee-
-�iEldrJ�ae lve5��rov�C
ANY -MAT . WASTE YANAGMMIT PLAN CSRTIFICATI02i FOR NE'rt OR EZPAN-DED PEEDLOTS
Please retu.-•a the ccr:pleted form to the Divisioa of Eaviroraaatal Lea :agement at
the add --Gas on the raverse side of this f
�0 1Cr5
Name of farm se print): Y o ok n
P
Address: F
Phone No.: -
County : n S c�
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude: Zj`j(required), Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identif'ed.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): uii -
Design capacity (number of animals): . aZ $ D
Average size of operation'(12 month population avg.): l
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for -the fare named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North _
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haue�been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater.runoff events less severe than the 25-yeas, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical S eci% at (Please Print) : a,4r/ 3 .5"-11
Affiliation: —
Address (Agency)- i e Phone No. - S
====c=========c=a.=sa====aaaanssa�ssss=sa===sea=sanaaa=sue==a=aasaaeaas
Owner/xanager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
K.—a of Land Owner(Please-/
P-rrintt) U
6751
Signature: �C�6Z , ;Z, Date
Name of Xanager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY:ACNr.W#
W2- ovc,,- 1061eC/ 7115 uJ/e i

'r PLAN CERT17IC-ATION FOR h-ZW OR E=+�-%TD=D FEEDLOTS
T1S1I+'Sr.1ST8 �AG
„•At,
Pleaee.setura':th. cc= feted for= to the Diviaioa of P.aviroanaatal Maaagea:aat at
.r: thi addrea• oa the =Averse side of this son.
•Name of farm (Please pri t):
Address:/A 2 t°
"Ca-u Phone No.•
County: T A.-.s5,
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:,-` LE _&Z" 12f LZ_ Ae (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location ide,ntified.
Type of operation swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : a16 0 - Atnish,n.
Design capacity (n r of animals): 2 RR0
Average size of operation'(12 month population avg.): .2 8 8o
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): 3 3 t -
a=n=a=aaaaaaaa=aaaaaaaaaaa=nano=aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaaaanaaaaaaa�aaaaa
Technical Specialist Ces-tificatiom
As a technical specialist. designated by the North Carolina Soil. and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water. Conservation Ccrsnission pursuant -to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haue bbeen verified by me or other designated technical specialists ard_
areincluded in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers): liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipmentp schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. n
2;a=e of Technical pj,cialist (Please Print) : (" �l'r'5 5m;
Af f il•iation: S; r a S rv' e l
Address (Agencyj : O b NoeStteet Phone No. qb -_ZI 38)
L'� SCt,NL 2�s72
Signature:___ Date
a=aaaaaaaaaaasaaasaaaaasasaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaas aaaaassaaaaassuaaaaaaas�
Owner/ifamager Agraemaat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Na—_a off Land nam�r rpt eaa�Dri nt 1 . X �V G .il L Q A —
Signature :� - �! c_` `— Date • X to
N=a of Kanager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature:% Date-
;ote: A change in landownership requires notification or�a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY:AC T=-W#

_y7ASTE _UTILIZATION PLAN --
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(iMdod oaly It mddltloaal land has to be leaaod, sea.)
I, ��-Q�,� Zia P hereby give / ri d r o
permto apply animal waste from �s Was Utilization System
o acr s of m land for the duration of time shown below.
e 0 Q,� l �%r%Y�
I u and that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
e potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landow
�ldir' Waste Producer:
Technical Repre
SWCD Representa
Date:
Date: ,p.- -- '
Date:
Date:
Terra of Agreement: , 192i-to a : 200-5-
(MlnixuA of Sea Years an Cost Shared Zteas)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
yVV -/Mink 77��3 /S Gt)��G� W� �7�t✓ f CL�/ �GeY%
/�71s- T/ei5� d0 QCvtiy lu/� � 6C( 6lonJ
CG/v/ S
-CJV -JJ yfl� Oy-

Animal Waste Utilization Agreement
I, Frank Lee, hereby give Eldridge Westbrook permission to apply waste
from his Animal Waste Management System on 21.53 acres of my land. I
will allow this waste to be applied on these acres and these crops in an
environmentally safe manner according to an approved nutrient management
plan for goon. T w
Tract Number: 515
Field.Number(s): 3
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, and potash,
and when properly applied will not harm my land or crops, and will
reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner Date
Waste Pi6di er Date
�_ a 4,L- A
CO I'K VK , Z-,- -,4�

APR a _ .
UNITED STATES NATURAL RESOURCES 806:NORTH STREET:,•
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION.. ',SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
AGRICULTURE SERVICE ,:. TELEPHONE:;919=989-5381
-March12,1996
Geroge H. Pettus
GHF, Inc.
P 0 Box 10009
Goldsboro, NC 27532
Dear George:
Here is a copy of Eldridge Westbrook's waste plan �'.He' wanted to keep. as much of
Field #1, Tract #11824 in row crops as possible which •part of (approx. 4 acres) is
planned for coastal this spring. He also has an agreernerit with Frank Lee to pump on
4.50-5.0 acres of coastal on the back side of Field #3, Tract,#515 which I have not
.included in the plan at this point. I understand from Eldridge and Frank that they are
talking about pumping on corn in Field #3, Tract'#515 (approximately '21.5. acres) this
spring. _
Please get with Eldridge"and if this is not agreeable with everyone," I will be glad to
revise. We may need another agreement with. Frank if we pump on,more land. I
understand ,they want to plant tobacco in Field #3 next year..
Sincerely, _
Chris Smith
SCT T It%24 r- 14-473A-c
enclosure.
`f5A-cc.o1
cc: Eldridge Westbrook
i /:-V�f2.G_s:i� YGc-� i•'cL�'' wl F�-A-�+IC ..

is • i
:r Y
w
r.
At
t� 1, ,��.. `1r •�•1.[ -'' t � � ����'..}'1} �'.•,�?A„5 �,��` •Y R•-Ire �a7+ /
y• ��
1. � 'S • •'• J O. �..=!�:!!••,'•'ii' •'y':.".(�� 1+:.•1.. �� � .. . ry? � �„q '%� •i
Iz
0.7
Ali y ii r .t - ..•-1�•,.�.. - �; .:4• � : - ( _` •
/ems �• ,1 •:' .�'J�� t .lt �I h+� � •. � }I.
�rC�,•t • I. � '[ •'•���r t :'-�J .' . ,' jj����� , _}t, nu•, a �.

E
FARM NO. J NAME?b AjOORESS { PROGRAM YEAR SERIAL NO.
/o� G v /C' l { ' l e 1 f/1)CS i r�� G ► ` PHOTO NUM ERS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Stabilizat4n and Conservaton S6NICB
O'n K_S NC 15ay MEASUREMENT SERVICE RECORD
WA
0
5"6 0'-S
SECTION I • SERVICE REQUEST AND COST
1. KIND OF SERVICE REQUEST
4. PROGRAM CROP OR LAND USE
J. NO. ACRES
4. NO. PLOTS
6. COST
6. BASIC FARM RA TE
S
Stake and Reference
Measurement after Planting
Q Remeasurement
OTHER
(SpeCO)
I
T. TOTAL ACREAGE CGST
S
ri I • I i (. 7 •r
S. TOTAL COST OF SE%.VICE
REQUESTED
S
TOTAL y
9. PERSON MAKING REQUEST
1G. CASH RECEIPT
I hereby agree to pay the cost of the service as requested.
PAYMENT RECEIVED FOR SERVICES REQUESTED
1✓U
S — cK OR MO
CASH
SIGNATURE OF PERSON MAKING REQUEST DATE
SIGNATURE OF COUNTY OFFICE EMPLOYEE`
DATE
11. FOR REMEASUREMENT ONLY
12. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO -REPORTER
REFUND FOR (Lrop or service
No RefundEl
A.IJOUNT CHECK NO. DATE APPROVAL
S
REPORTER NAME DATEISSUED
DATE RETUR-NED
SECTION II
- RECORD OF MEASUREMENT SERVICE PERFORMED
TRACT
NO.
— 13
SO
FIELD
NO.
CROP OR LAND USE
ACRES
DETERMINED
CrOpAM
20
22
24
GROSS
DEDUCTIONS
17
NET
14
is
r ct.
16
.3
18
19
21
23
0 Lo IVI
7 I
Cg U6�a/
1&
7 /
Na
%
U5
/
r0 A nlOL
• 9
ROW
6r_oF
O
U
OT T LS A
3 '1.
REPORTER: All required determinations for this
farm visit have been made in accordance with
REPORTER
n O.
DATE
I 1 1
applicable procedures. 115 1 � (p
Based on County Office records, the land designat for (ACRE) or CU for PAYMENT (meets ❑ , does not meet ❑ , cannot be
Verified as meeting[]) the cropping requirements or other eligibility requirements, as applicable.
n U nn �rovlr-e oeoennuen

.a I
ASCS-409 to?•xa•y;,;
FARM NO. NAME 8 ADDRESS
r 4A
PROGRAM YEAR SERIAL NO.
/�
PHOTO NUMBERS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricvhtsa, Stabilization and Conservation Service
MEASUREMENT SERVICE RECORD
TELEPHONE NO. IFARM LOCATION
SECTION I - SERVICE REOUEST AND COST
1. KIND OF SERVICE REQUEST
2. PROGRAM CROP OR LAND USE
9. NO. ACRES
4. NO. PLOTS
S. COST
r* BAStC FARM RATE
S
0 Stake and Reference
Q Measurement after Planting
Q Remeasurement
OTHER
(Specify)
}
/t
1 'J, r'. i 1 1 r �,_. ,
i
7. TOTAL ACREAGE COST
S
%p) /I,, !
, G
a. TOTAL COST OF SERVICE
REQUESTED
S t�L/
TOTAL �►
— 9. PERSON MAKING REQUEST
10. CASH RECEIPT
I hereby agree to pay the cost of the service as requested.
PAYMENT RECEIVED FOR SERVICES REQUESTEDS
CK OR MO CASH
SIGNATURE CF PERSON MAKING REQUEST DATE
SIGNATURE OF COUNTY OFFICE EMPLOYEE DATE
11. FOR FVEMEASUfrEMENT ONLY
12. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO REPORTER
REFUND FOR Crop or Service
No Refund
A,'.IOUNT CHECK NO. DATE APPROVAL
S
REPORTER NAME DATE ISSUED DATE RETURNED '
SECTION II
- RECORD OF MEASUREMENT
SERVICE PERFORMED
TRACT
NO.
FIELD
No.
CROP OR LAND USE
15
ACRES DETERMINED
�oplry
20
/ 22
24
GROSS
DEDUCTIONS
17
NET
18
18
19
21
23
;'L
lP
•'
/� Q/J Puri'' ^ o?
�' `
�►. �
C
// Pk7h r�
6 0 c S �(. 1! a
! ,c
l
d
a
O
TOTALS
3 9
REPORTER: All required determinations for this REPORTER GATE
farm visit have been made In accordance with
applicable procedures. �) l tL,, ,
Based on County. Office records, the land designated/for (ACRU or CU for PAYMENT ❑) ( c Ls ❑ , does not meet ❑ , cannot be
verified as meeting❑ ) the cropping requirements or other eligibility requirements, as applicab p
OPERATOR'S COPY OF SERVICE PERFORMED

UN L'1'r-U Jl: '1LJ
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
TELEPHONE: [phone]
George H. Pettus
GHF, Inc.
P 0 Box 10009
Goldsboro, NC 27532
Dear George:
April 16, 1996
The enclosed plan will work, and I have gone over it with Eldridge. I have not
gone over it with Frank. This rotation will free up 19 acres for planting tobacco
between tract 11824 and tract 515. This means a total of at least 8.64 acres
between the two tracts needs to follow a 2 year rotation of corn, small grain, double
crop soybeans. This will give an average consumption of nitrogen of 196.85 Ibs per
year. Nitrogen on the small grain can be put out in split application, late fall and early
spring. The problem that will arise is who will plant tobacco where and what year.
If I can work with you on this or can answer questions, please call me. Note: I
need agreement from Frank on the entire farm.
Sincerely,
Chris W. Smith
Soil Conservation Technician
enclosure
cc: Eldridge Westbrook

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE-1
April 8, 1996 W
PRODUCER: WESTBROOK BROTHERS
LOCATION: 199 SCOUT ROAD
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 2880 hogs design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount'of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be -grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can.
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infi-litration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied. to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to.planting.. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for.injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs x 2.3 1bs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
TP
18�
8507
UN1
RAINS
3.4
170
0
10.79
SEP-MAY
— I--- F F - IMAR-OCT
SEP-MAY
., I I�.._WIMAR-JUN
11824 1-4 INORFOLK0-2, J 6,� y 160 11440 110.4611506.24�
air ayr3 SEP-APR
• Z V 1. V V. I L
JUN.-AUG
n L
- TOTAL I 9; -6
ay.- A040Jzil 6ti3 ,ss
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE~3
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
17.23
TIME
2027.97
515
3
NORFOLK 0-2o
C
110
117.7
0
MAR-JUN
cs�.vu.a: wzmi�uc
END
G T V 1 • L G
SEP-APB
-AUC
MAR-OCT
TOTAL
9y
3
�y r R0+4:ii0A
-- Indicates that this field.is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer -annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small drain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.

K
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN -PAGE-4
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
LBS N
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.07
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
AMOUNT 0
28.46
47.69
6624
* * * BALANCE .9 2 6 I . G5
A
19.os
This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to 70b4cc0 R044,
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 5
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored -in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and.
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPPERATION: c/
None. /1rofe- Tra�,� ��,? / /�'�Q #� W1 T�'�/��� 0. COrrl� 61"a�lgrc�i�
5e� h e a n ro �� �b� , y r r o a, i orl 7,- 7�rG c/ #S/S 7Q e `la
2�F3 e 7�00 'P i ei cJwle``1&6e- 0- �j a u �r4 � 5� ss�' c o y l A3/-e I- �I e 4 J cv � c
W 1 M e ah AJ `sly
@ C.'t N re Is.e re m er►%/� W //t rl CIO / bb 7 Ar e A
ro JU C e So 7'h�S 1ur/ ire 4 7rev. 1l Acv� �w chacc
JJ
Ue, 00f�6 eEcl dW i R 0- 7 2'e I it #e w.',i lei-
ro
l � U �
y�9�

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE-6
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the -
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a' method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
sprinc4 planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management. system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or .
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
NAME OF FARM: WESTBROOK BROTHERS FARM
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for'the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment,.to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will;,-be.applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs -
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: WESTBROOK BROTHERS
SIGNATURE:� ��l,Ga l DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Chris W. Smith
AFFILIATION: NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 806 North Street
SMIthfield 27577
SIGNATURE:(! DATE: - - b

an
l�iVl;p
A.IA

In
n
In
(t
N
i
.
to
n
o
hl
••
ro
Ili
to
11
It1
11
,tj
to
if
rt
�NNr
1
1n
W.
n•
to
ro
to
n
Ci
it
t3
t
it
n
to
I
11 .
t
in
t 1
rt •
('•
to
ro
L
(p
to
�
rt
co
c)
'tj
u c1
N
N
N
for
I Or rt
to
to
10 10
i
I-,
a
I
n M [1 1.1 010
IhIt' n
11 m
Wyly
II
1 ' It.
•
It. to to
to
fl 1 •• I I
to
10 11 ; to
I
n �1 (1
tt
i'• t l
I ' Or N It•
ru rt
' t
n c,
to ra
11,11 (1 tl
'tl
(t ro
I1,'ti
t
to 1-' 11
F
iI.
l�
�4
I
rf n n to
" '
r1-•
In
ro11101n
to (1
11. Ir
~
n. n ro to
:, to
11
II 1-•
III to II
Intl on
ucn10
G
n 'r1 ID
� t)
II rl lt'
I
I I In to 111
to S'q
n tl to
lr lI,'"
r
11
1
It In I..
to II I'
l
;
c�
1
ru
() N �•.
(•0Y r
1� I.
tIn
�
i
1-1
O
i-•
21,
r�� ro
tl tl ,n
tl ru
t r, (). ro
In
t
n
t to'(t iI
n (I
iI
I It it
II, to
I to u
1• rt'tl'd
I c:
t'J
lu to n'
II n
I.
Il-(I11
I I I). I- In
to I -
�
to '•; •(I
1 •
I I to, 11'
In 11
I i
• Irfu n
trto
fu 11
n 1
t
:1,
1 • In
I,
V to
t)'
ro I).
(o to
r
n In
In
1; ( I
rU
�u
1

. ...
'
is
hG 17et/_ �;DG_ /"GZ-✓�//C
ep c/ .[/i
„z�p X, ,2o = 02 0 3
.? o 1 X a2D 4 = 41/.209
TT �y 6 r ✓mob /s� -
dD - Cir^ b;� Ou
�7G�b
�3 �-
b
G- o�

I ..
No,�,e 93`i' y93,2.
/73 y
�,- 4R 17 L c� Cam. X-Z 3 c ` Lo tc /E. Tc7 Lie
%l'e✓/�c.� /SZ` C'u /,%9 R A)ozz.% %0. 'vS_ —=30 " 9,c a,-et,l Aye.,
4lS G: PA,
,23% X 931 531 3,
2-- cu, �4- X .2 3,e-S - I oc
-sa3O s
AC'C
/0
�:'/C4 ill
-- Cl-,/ra(�
ti A
��Qgrant
d
e35 Cover

SOIL IRRIGATION
RACT# FIELD# ACRES TYPE GROUP
ACRES
RATEIRR LESS BUFFER AREAS DEDUCTED
USABLE.
ACRES
-2
Y � - F
/V
ZCA- a
I%
zlo Louth
.5 . 2
L) -
0
-Z J
iCJs
eZ.,7J
o

I
I of 3
Ca
1-Waste Mara em.:ent
Biological andAgricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING,- AXALYSIS AND CALCULATION -
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAXPLE COLLECTIbN:
A. Semi -Solid -LoC.. Manure:
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic colle-ctors
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under.r-he- siurface"crusc
avoiding bedding materials and using nonme tall ic: colle ccors..
B. .Liquid .Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on.*boc*h ends into
manure to pit,.floor.
b. Seal upper end,of conduit (e.g.. by'placing a:Ch=b.-aver end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower.'end, 'remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic -container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least: 1 quart.
d. Mix.and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container..
ii. Exterior storage basin or -tank
a. hake sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper- ag,. zacor pump. or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsar.oles from about 5 pit locations. from agitator pump:
or from manure. spreader and place in a plastic bucket. :ate,'.
Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engin,
Department. North Carolina State University. Raleigh. NC.

2 of 3
c. Hix and add 3/4 pint CO a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid .
4 inc of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
is Collect about 3/ p
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
it. From lagoon pole.
a• Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10-15'
0.-15' away from bank edge.
b. Extend bottle 1
c• Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle vithin 14 of. liquid surface.
repeat about 5 times
e.•Emptllic sasampple container.
around
y into a plastic bucket,
lagoon, mix,.and add 3/4 pint to nonmeta
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
8, Visually inspect litter. for areas of varying quality. e•-g-.
-vacerers, and estimate percent of
areas around feeders and
floor surface in each area.
b, Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g.. if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and frorers. cakender of sfloorpsurfacee therand the
ocher 4 subsarples m
remac..At each location.
coll c talitter
from
a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place
t.
d• After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
oan� seal.
tallic sample container such as
about •2-3 •lbs litter t
a 1-gallon freezer bag
it. From stockpile pile.
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into
b. Hix, add 2-3 lbs CO nonmetallic sample container and seal.

3 of 3
0
P cr
II. SAHPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container With clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to .lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. AFL Eastern Agricultural Lab,
7621 Whitepine Road
Richmond, VA 23237
Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
2320 S. Foster Avenue
Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F.'Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic -Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward.$4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing: turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, nurb11 er flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c..Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry_, lagoon liquid; sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca, ifg, Na.
S, Fe, hn, Zn, Cu. B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: Dti, t.0. Cd. Ni, Pb

I i
ASCS-409 (07-24-y;,)
FARM NO. NAME 6 ADDRESS
Al-
13?a
PROGRAM YEAR
PHOTO NUMBERS
IAL
Agriahwal SIANIzation and Conservation Service
MEASUREMENT SERVICE RECORD
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO CONTACT I TELEPHONE NO. FARM LOCATION
SECTION I - SERVICE REOUEST AND COST
1. KIND OF SERVICE REQUEST
2. PROGRAM CROP OR LAND USE
3. NO. ACRES
4. NO. PLOTS
8. COST
rL BASIC FARM RATE
$
Stake and Reference
Measurement after Planting
Remeasurement
OTHER
(Specify)
AI
7. TOTAL ACREAGE COST
$
GJti,d
a. TOTAL COST OF SERVICE
REQUESTED
TOTAL y
9. PER$ON MAKING REQUEST
10. CASH RECEIPT
I hereby agree to pay the cost of the service as requested.
PAYMENT RECEIVED FOR SERVICES REQUESTEDS
CK OR MO
F-TcASH
SIGNATURE OF PERSON MAKING REQUEST DATE
SIGNATURE OF COUNTY OFFICE EMPLOYEE
DATE
11. FOR lIEMEASU EMENT ONLY
12. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO ORTEFt
REFUND FOR(Crop or service
No Refund
M UN CHECK NO. DATE APPROVAL
s
REPORTER NAME DATE ISSUED
DATE RETURNED
SECTION II
- RECORD OF MEASUREMENT SERVICE
PERFORMED
TRACT
NO.
S 3f
FIELD
NO.
14 —
CROP OR LAND USE
ACRES DETERMINED
1pptq I.
20 —
21
23
24
GROSS
16
3
DEDUCTIONS
NET
18
— 15
Cho
17
19
22
dry Nj
/
1A u�
C oQ P
z1' s
X1,
�o � NaC
a •
,�. s�
(ire nkArd Lp as a
,
T OTAL S
3 9
REPORTER: All required determinations for this
farm visit have been made In accordance with
REPORTER
DATE
applicable procedures. 3 S
Based on County Office records, the land designate or (AC R❑ or CU for PAY MIE❑) ( Bets ❑ , does not meet ❑, cannot be
verified as meeting ❑) the cropping requirements or other eligibility requirements, as applicab e. _
noFPIATe) IQ rnov nG caavlrrF uGacnaurn

1 -1
ASCS7409 (07-24.90)
FARM NO. NAME 3 ADDRESS
lr y 1 �/ �=. e T. �t �r.s 4 bit
I Qq
FpLr Da.Ks . NC �rXaV
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO CONTACT'
(SA--nE 4-5 7.&V&)
PROGRAMMYEAR SERIAL NO.
`9
PHOTO NUMBERS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service
MEASUREMENT SERVICE RECORD
TELEPHONE NO. IFARM LOCATION
SECTION I - SERVICE REQUEST AND COST
1. KIND OF SERVICE REQUEST
2. PROGRAM CROP OR LAND USE
3. NO. ACRES
4. NO. PLOTS
5. COST
S. BASIC FARM RATE
$
Q Stake and Reference
Q Measurement after Planting
Q Remeasurement
OTHER
(Specify)
li�(1-• l�n�.: 'r�1�,' 4 1; .
7. TOTAL ACREAGE COST
S
R -J . I n e. t1e. ..r •t . ,.
8. TOTAL COST OF SERVICE
REQUESTED
S
TOTAL y
9. PERSON MAKING REQUEST
1C. CASH RECEIPT
I hereby agree to pay the cost of the service as requested.
PAYMENT RECEIVED FOR SERVICES REQUESTED
S CK OR MO
_ CASH
SIGNATURE OF PERSON MAKING REQUEST GATE
SIGNATURE OF COUNTY OFFICE EMPLOYEE,.
DATE
t 1. FOR REMEASUREMENT ONLY
12. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO -REPORTER
REFUND FOR(Crop or service
No Refund Q
AMOUNT CHECK NO. DATE APPROVAL
REPORTER NAME DATEISSUED
DATE RETURNED
SECTION 11
- RECORD OF MEASUREMENT SERVICE PERFORMED
TRACT
NO.
— 13
so
FIELD
NO.
14
CROP OR LAND USE
ACRES DETERMINED
C1V411
20
22
24
GROSS
16
.3
DEDUCTIONS
NET
15
-
17
18
19
21
23
,4
% I
9,
7 f
r'0 /.AnIaC.
af,
/�
!- ` S C uC.'
wol—
1q.9
6r_oP
'7
o
TOTALS
<<?`.>
O
REPORTER: AH required determinations for this
farm visit have been made in accordance with
REPORTER
n /) a
DATE
1
applicable procedures. ly
Based on County Office records, the land des ignat for (AlIC RQ or CU for PAY MENT (meets ❑ , does not eet ❑ , cannot be
verified as meeting0 ) the cropping requirements or other eligibility requirements, as applicable. _
r1DCDATr10'C r`ADV nC CCDVICC DPDCA01LACr1

r
Y•i••t
``•' is ' %'
t
A193 DG.
'� �' � - `- dr.•
'
- _. r..
•
F- Al- -
l
11Lji
R '� I J tee'' �.r-�=-.:�;1�'y � -n:;,�,�i�`,�-- J •',�� .�:.� ,ice '� ,y•l
14.
t ,
.. .. � sue•} •'�y., � � _ '- r .. ,.

Emergency Action Plan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from you operations are leaking, overflowing,
or running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your
property to consider that you have a problem. You should make very effort to ensure that this does
not happen. This plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and
breaks can happen at any time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow:
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam _
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping contractor
• make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary
storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
• immediately stop waste application
• create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
• incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system:
• pipes and sprinklers:
OO stop recycle (flushing system) pump
© stop irrigation pump
OO close valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
Page 1

• flush system, houses, solids separators:
(D stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
OO make sure no siphon effect has been created
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks:
• dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and
pump back into the lagoon
• if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
• other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, lagoon problems require the consultation of an individual
experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: 919-571-4700; after
hours, emergency number: 800-858-0368 or 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident, the exact
location of the facility, and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather
and wind conditions, what corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of
the situation.
b) Your integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Division, Maxwell Foods; Inc.
919-778-3130 extension 1430
c) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
919-989-5050 .
Page 2

d) Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 919-989-5180.
e) (For technical assistance)
Contact CES: 919-989-5380
Local NRCS office: 919-989-5381
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
a)
b) -
c)
6) Contact dirt moving and/or heavy equipment companies:
a)
b)
c)
johnston
Page 3

WAS FrahkL ce
in Qtl C //i �l[Ihfr3 —
NJ uJ EIGri�Gte- u e51-71 ./ ✓ rc v/,-
ANZHAT WASTE MANAG22EMM PLAN CERTIFICATION POR NSW OR EXPANDED FEEDLOTS
Please retu_-3 the cepleted foss to the Division of Environmental Zia: agement at
the addresa on the raverae side of this fq".i/
Name of farm (P tease print): !JY
Address: / V `i .S*c "I-* _ &
Phone No.• -
County :i+ An 5 0,�
Fars location: Latitude and Longitude: LQ /:e /,a ZZ'Qfr,/ (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): wi -
Design capacity (number of animals): A 5 D
Average size of operation'(12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
a===q=acaacaao=acaa==aa==caaac==aaa=aaaaaa3==sa=aa==a==asoaa-s=a ca=caacaa==a
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to ISA NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria -have —been —verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater.runoff events less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical S aciaYst (Please Print) : ��/�/-/ -1 7/h' �
Affiliation:
Address (Agency),•pp a Phone No. Y8 Y- .6-381
Signature:__ CA", 4t%.e�uXZ Date:
=====a-=a=aaa===anon=aacaaaaaasea=ss:aaaa==aaaaaaa=aaao =_ =aaaa=aaas
Owner/Manager Agreeaent -
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before, the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Na-e of Land Owner
//(Please
-Print) A
Signature:Date:
Nama of Manager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
`rote: A change in landownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DER USE ONLY:ACNc.rl#
GUe, aver to aKc C/ l/�/ 5 "-dellr0 �� �`� h�7

Hie a I t h and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Mcnagement.
Jcmes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes. Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFT_CP.TION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED ANI?X_XL FEEDLOTS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF APPROVED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR
NEW OR EXPANDED ANIMAL WASTE MAICkGEI�-HNT SYSTEMS SERVING FEEDLOTS
P�'OUl' ��'`�'t'PS/PII?POSE
In order to be deemed pe_r=tted by the Division of Environmental Management
(DE.4), the owner of any new or expanded animal waste management system
constructed after January 1, 1994 which is designed to serve greater than or
equal to the animal populations listed below is required to submit a signed
certification form to DEM 12efore the new animals are stocked on the farm.
Pasture operations are exempt from the requirement to be certified.
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1,000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid waste system
The certification must be signed by the owner of the feedlot (and manager if
different from the owner) and by any technical specialist designated by the Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. A
technical specialist must verify by an on -site inspection that all applicable
design and construction standards and specifications are met as installed and
that all applicable operation and maintenance standards and specifications can
be met.
Although the actual number of animals at the facility may vary from time to time,
the design capacity of the waste handling systemm should be used to determine if
a farm is subject to the certification requirement. For example, if the waste
system for a feedlot is designed to handle 300 hogs but the average population
will be 200 hogs, then the waste management system requires a certification.
This certification is required by regulations governing animal waste management
systems adopted by the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on December 10,
1992 (Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217).
.Z • k
On the reverse side of this page is the certification form which must be
submitted to DE1 before new animals are stocked on the farm. Assistance in
completing the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies
such as the soil and water conservation district, the USDA -Soil Conservation
Service, or the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service. The form should be sent to:
Department of Environ.-nent, Health and
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535,
Phone: [phone]
Form ID: ACNEW0194
Natural Resources
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
Date: l /. 5'FF
P.O.. Box 29535. Rdeigh. North Ccrolino 27626-05:5 Teaephone 919-733-7015 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity A"rmc,1ve Action Employer SC'A recycled/ 10°.o pce-consumer pcper

�,�• United States Soil
Department of Conservation
Agriculture Service
George H. Pettus
Goldsboro Milling Hog Farms
P O Box 10009
Goldsboro, NC 27532
806-North Street
Smithfield, NC 27577
April 11, 1994
Attached is a complete copy of the plans for a hog lagoon for the
Frank Lee farm. Please call me at 919-989-5381, if you have any
questions.
Kenneth C. York
District Conservationist
Attachment
O The Soil Conservation Service
`J is an agency of the
Department of Agriculture

11,13111,
LAGOON DESIGN CHECK LIST
N4 1. Copy of 026 and supporting maps included if clearing involved.
(including access roads and waste application system sites)
/✓A 2 • Dam Safety Exclusion
a. Dike not over 15 feet high to down stream slope and not over
10 acre feet storage to top of dike.
3. Storage Volumes ,
a. designed volume exceeds needs
b. all temporary storage is designed above the seasonable high
water table.
C. minimum of 6 feet treatment volume depth available
✓ d. no sludge storage statement included if landowner so requests
4. Operation & Maintenance Plan (sheet included)
a. begin and end pump -out elevations shown
5. Location Sketch (included)-
✓ a. distance and direction to nearest residence shown
b. road numbers shown
c,- c. north arrow shown
Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34 included)
a. distance to nearest stream in event of dike failure shown
b. distance to nearest public road in event of failure shown
v c. topo map of area .to support a & b above included
7. Waste Utilization Plan (included)
tea. all tracts, field numbers, field acreage, (available acres
excluding buffers for ditches, roads, homes, property line,
etc..).crops shown
mob. signatures of producer & person preparing plan
pM c. pumping agreement signed by adjoining landowner showing tract
numbers, field numbers, acres, etc. if needed
✓d. legible ASCS maps of effluent disposal fields included
✓e. legible soil survey sheets showing all effluent disposal
fields included
f. suitability of soils for crops planned assured
g. attachment "B" on sampling procedure included
8. Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG-538 included).
a. minimum of three borings on Class IV & V lagoons
b. borings 2.0' below designed bottom of lagoon
V c. location & elevation of borings in relation to grid survey
✓d. seasonal high water table at highest elevation
�`P e. borrow area location shown

L.-9. Seeding specifications included (lagoon dike and other exposed
areas around buildings)
10. Construction Specifications' (sheet included)
c/ a. need for cut-off trench addressed
✓ b. need for sealing or lining with impervious material addressed
and -anticipated locations of such areas identified
✓"c. protection of liner during,initial filling and near flush
pipes addressed
11. Grid Sheet (original or ledgable copy)
v-a. gridded area large enough to include embankment slopes and
surface water diversions
,.rb. location & dimensions of lagoon & buildings shown (lagoon
inside top measurements shown and lagoon corners identified
by grid stations)
mac. surface water removal (pipes, outlets, etc) shown
� d. soil borings location shown
✓e. TBM'location & elevation shown
�- fry. existing utilities located (if applicable)
U -s �i 2 e y'.A
12. Typical cross-section included
a. dike elevation & top width shown
t,.-b. lagoon bottom elevation shown
C. side slopes shown
.-d. effluent outlet pipe invert elevation shown
­e. building pads - elevation & grade shown
�f. cut-off trench shown - if required
Wig. liner shown - if required
13. Volume Computations
L-a. excavation
�, b. dike fill
V c. pad fill
14. Summary Sheet
"a. design requirements
-b. excavation volume
c. fill volumes
­ d. cut -fill ratio
e. job class i
r/A 15. Location of :subsurface drainage (if present)
16. Presence of utilities addressed
✓17. Observation of cultural resources statement included
,,i18. Operation is outside of jurisdictional limits of municipalities

�=.'\ Uml•C �ta1•!
�� 1 Oeosnm•nt of
`•���' A`r.Curtt.r•
Sod
COnaervallon
$•rvice
CPERATOR: P;ZANIC LEE
?lease review the attached plan and specificaticns care`ully. Retain
this plan for your use and records. It is strongly recommended that you,
ycur contractor, and Soil Conservation Service personnel are in agreement
as to how the waste lagoon is to be constructed. The Soil Conservation
Service personnel will meet with all concerned parties and walk over the
site to explain all flags and markings. It is important that everyone
.:riders;and what is.expec;ed so that final construction meets plans and
specification and the job can be certified for payment (if cost -sharing
is involved).
The pad dimensions and grades are the best estimate. The BUILDER or
CONTRACTOR is RESPONSIBLE for final layout and design of the pads. The
Soil Conservation Service personnel will assist in a limited capacity,
as its major concern is the proper design and construction.of the waste
treatment lagoon.
The actual amount of material required for pads and dam may vary from the
estimates. The design.will attempt to balance cuts and fills as close as
pcssible. If additional material is required after construction is complete
on the lagoon, the contractor and'cwner will negotiate on the price and
location of borrow area. .
NOTE: Design Requirement: .56 081 cu.ft. 0 cu.yds.
Estimate of Excavation: cu.ft. 1g24-5 cu.yds.
Estimate o, Pad L Cike: cu.ft. 11567 cu.yds.
Rat ion A EXTIZA Dllzr r,> CMfe'e TrzyIN& TD k6;l:p PAM I a W As F'94AI8LE.
--� PtT RECHARGE BcDG. WOIILp�i14rT51TE %E��
AT LRFLNSH HORSE pGi/G.NED
NDOnI►/ER RE4UEC,T. EXTRA DIRT TO PsE f1SGD IN FRONT 0 F r3LOG5.
Job Class IV2g1hARLNq�} 1
Cate -/JJ� .Cn�
TD �e Dit" as /I ��90k?o,
Designed By l ,�ju.7c/PL4- neecl
Approval
Design A
PP
1 ame
��,�
oa to y ore Mtartinc '
vca� �..►ic:n
'I* So. Ct7n86. 41'an s,"tc•
V `� • :.:sncr Jf :M
• .t of •CnCvn�f,

Operator:Frank Lee County: Johnston
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
Date: 03/29/94
1150.0 feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT
(ALW)
0 sows (farrow to
finish)
x
1417
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to
feeder)
x
522
lbs.
= 0
lbs
2880 head (finishing
only)
x
135
lbs.
- 388800
lbs
0 sows (farrow to
wean)
x
433
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0 head (wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs.
= 0
lbs
Describe other :
0
Total Average Live Weight = 388800 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
�II 1 % %
/,a.hq owner re ues7ecl ho—S�u�gc'. UD/4m� Le —
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet adgeJ, 0LOS 1 �J
y -8- 9y
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 365.0
Inside top width (feet)---------------------- 200.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 52.0
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 40.0
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)------------------ 3.0 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 359.0 194.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
359.0 194.0 69646 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
293.b 128.0 37504 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
326.0 161.0 209944 (AREA OF MIDSECTION•* 4)
CU. FT. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
69646.0 209944.0 37504.0 1.E
Total Designed Volume Available = 581339 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
365.0 200.0 73000.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 73000.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 710208 gals. or 94947.6 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = �7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 42583.3 cubic feet

'5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA,
Volume = 40758.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
94948
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
42583
cubic
feet
5D.
40758
cubic
feet
TOTAL, 178289 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====================> 180 days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation======_====> 7.0 inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================> 6.7 inches
Freeboard===================================> 1.0 feet
Side slopes_________________________________> 3.0 : 1
Inside top length===========================> 365.0 feet
Inside top width============================> 200.0 feet
Top of dike elevation=======================> 52.0 feet'
Bottom of lagoon elevation=—==============> 40.0 feet
Total required volume=======================> 567089 cu. ft.
Actual design volume========================> 581339 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===> 43.9 feet
Stop pumping elev.__________________________> 48.1 feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.==========> 43.9 feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=> 46.0 feet
Required minimum treatment volume===========> 388800 cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation============> 393025 cu. ft.
Start pumping elev._________________________> 50.3 feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==> 540581 cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation===========> 533396 cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped================> 137531 cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========> 140370 cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==> 1.8 feet
7. DESIGNED BY:, APPROVED BY:
DATE: 47, DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

S.:S-ENG-5ld U. S. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTUkE
Re.. 5-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
N-VF--ctW,ALION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY Of PROPOSED POND SITE
CROPLAND-WATERSHEU AREA MEASUREMENTS
`
•• • • •
PROPOSEDSKE-TCH OF . . BORINGS
MIME
■
■■
■■■
��
■
■
■
■■
■
►•■■
■
■■■■
■
■■■
■■■■■
■■a
■■
No
MIEN
ME■E
■
■■■
■■■■■MIME
■E■EMME
■■■
■■
SEEM
■
■
■MEMO
NONE
■■
■W■■W■■WMMW
M
■■Il
wJ■■!�!■
■
.
M=
BORING NUNWER AND PROFILE
� I�itiiliai � ��� i IWI Ifiil
I■ I• I■ i: I • I■I■I�I■Inls! : I I- I I■I
• ,
i
i
!
i
OWN
I
I
I�I
I■I�
■�el■I
I■i®■I
.■�
�■I
I■I■I■I■I■I
I
I■I■I■
I■NimilEIfflim
MGM.
i�MINI■I■IMI1lIAI
: `�IMI■I■I■
MIS
■i
I�I�I
�®!���I�I■I■I■I
I■I®I®I®I®i■I
I■I■
®
I■�I
I®I®
!■I■I■IM��I■I■IMI■�■I■I�I■I■
�
I■!
�
I
I■I■ICliu�l�.'ll��JI!!!lII_�II��II�I�;��i■I
�
�
■�
I���I�,
',■
■I■I■
■I■I
IOI/�■I■i■I■I
1 J
Bac K/nn% -e 4Ifcc( '40 .+tia,� I;,ue r /�.y Nash,
NO C.lily1ura / /TGJ01,rcaJ L4Je.1 a 4u-f".-e0l

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW-Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g-gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s -Sand
GM - Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs -very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl-sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -grovel mix
(sl-fine sandy loam
SP - Poorly graded sands
1- loam
SM-Silty sand
gl-gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si-silt i
ML-Silts; silty. v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sil-.silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
cl-clay loam
CH - Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl -silty clay loam
MH - Elastic silts
scl -sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c-clay
1. Suitable material for embankment is available ff3Yes 0 No a.dicarf WA.,# lowr.,a on A..4.rch on
rawrae o4dff
REMARKS: p
�o�_1— �i 11e-c�fdrp�e %1a3tSeJ
d-u_ j4)yv is �� G4e t su�/c� .�'.- of t'.s S; 4- .
2. Explain bazarda requiring special attention in design lS.q,ua•, ,omw,.nct •rcl
- •Paco ��d 04{-om� 4y,-_rck +o{rwfh SP .►ta�uio� o,.
pJas4rc- Maavrr?/
Des,F,� 461"41'4 �p a•!t rl+�n. f r d 6Qya SAt Sp
ntay „-e,.1
GENERAL RENtA.RKS:
Dey/eAAI.1s on
So r lr /ii ve r4f-70ti;-�- of y 6e !"e�v.�eo%
24
25
26
27
28
2y
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
144
45
46
47
48
49
50 51
j�
(
I
1

�ow
MIN
r .'� f .,♦ : ` }► ' �;"''v" �' "'� ''ice '�•b :..i - ;
�:, .y „��KR. afy� I;�t?"r �: •ri,! r4 k,�� "' s' rv'''� •�•.':, 1 �, •,,,
14
IWOO
tWN
1���'aP.�y�1 i(,�'">t,11. \J '�Jryr, .�?P• I''r{y/��T►�•�d,/!'��'���,N �1` �,• , �� 1rya .k.� ��'
' �''t'. �::� r R",� ,'? ,_ ybyyL�G• t i 1�• s
e voG£
T\•'t..-„tay qtb. �'r' � y Mb.S9E ) � /+ �:•.:i
, y� ` �• .—"T"�• .l `• i ...^'+,'. �� ' Q;, ~ ''fit}i
�Olbr ••, •a , r V� 1••M' � 1
�t�Y , 1' a.s a 'fJ� ��t YC• � � '.r
�Yt ^:T♦I '1 i!. + 1 ti D.,��,Jrw y,r N! w •. {
ai t^ ., 1.1+� r �; S' +' ; • i jir ;� tr ,.;ti', � , r;11'� �;
' � , ��,4. � � ` � •'tip ,.'�.. �. +'�p-� ^�' •�'y.�:.
" r44
y7.t5.a'� 't!i},t� '�' .. Ai•. •., ,� 7t.. ,�'�+' ° t � `rLj�.! S�T, •y ..� y'"' '.r:�y',�.?"r�i
elk
� � �('. �/_ .r_'+,, •I � v � y= � � a�*�� . r, ,i ��,'',��r .�� •� a r', •', f�i<<
,.�' ./��. '',..t,7''"�„r�• ��a�+ti• fh'?• ': � r ♦.:.Y• ... • � :r:! ifC•t�� iI�C��l����,�
. K � .,.7FX�;f.`5 •t�.,-' •p'�' ���� ��M�jii�' ' •�; ^'71 '<7 •r I, N � � >a .
">�"1' . , rV ,'� ti. , � '► N ...� �+: Ora: , '► � ''Sd 1"A i f yi K `(' ry�7+� .. t •./r
ve °,

vy�
'vl

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation -to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its.capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 5043 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 48.1 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 137531 cubic feet or
1028731 gallons.

61iEE'1• L ur
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of —
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SHEET.1 OF 2
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
--------- -----------------------------------------------
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders,sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
-----------------------------------
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the. point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 5 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre-feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream tqe of the dike.
Precautions shall be. taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE. 1.8 ft.
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

SHEET 2 OF 2
Soil liner material shall come from an approved borrow area. The
minimum water content of the liner material shall be optimum moisture
content which relates to that moisture content when the soil is kneaded
in the hand it will form a ball which does not readily separate. Water
shall be added to borrow as necessary to insure proper moisture content
during placement of the liner. The moisture content of the liner
material shall not be less than optimum water content during placement.
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too wet
for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. Proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum ASTM D698 Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material. When smooth or hard, the previous lift
shall be scarified and moistened as needed before placement of the next
lift.
The single most important.factor affecting the overall compacted perme-
ability of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
The sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment in an estab-
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and -
compaction process. For most clay soils, a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
The soil liner shall be protected from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
or using flexible outlets on waste pipes.
Alternatives to soil liners are synthetic liners and bentonite sealant.
When these are specified, additional construction specifications are
included with this Construction Specification.
CUTOFF TRENCH:
--------------
A cutoff trench shall be constructed under the embankment area when
shown on a typical cross section in the plans. The final depth of the
cutoff trench shall be determined by observation of the foundation
materials.
VEGETATION:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be seeded
to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construc-
tion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
on areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Temporary seeding or mulch
shall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
dates for seeding. Permanent vegetation should be established as soon
as possible during the next period of approved seeding dates.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
-------------------------------
When tile drains are encountered, the tile will be removed to a minimum
of 10 feet beyond the outside toe of slope of the dike. The the
trench shall be backfilled and compacted with good material such as
SC, CL, or CH.

AREA TO BE SEEDED:
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
----------------------
2.5 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED AS FOLLOWS:
0.0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WEB' SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 30
FEBRUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRAIN AT 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0.0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 15
20.0 LBS. HULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 8 LBS./ACRE
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31 -
0.0 LBS. UNHULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 10 LBS./ACRE
SEEDING DATES: JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
100.0 LBS. RYE GRASS AT 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2500.0 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
5.0 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
250.0 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR.SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS,/ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

Total Volumes by Project
(combined volumes for each drawing)
Project: Frank Lee
Drawing: Drawing 2
Number: GHF048
Location: Johnston Co.
Bid Date:
Engineer: G. Pettus
Owner: F. Lee
Estimator:
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Date: 03/29/94 Time: 10:22:29
Drawing: Drawing 2
Grid cell size: 3.55 by 3.57
Original drawing scale: 100.00 ft/in
I CUT I FILL I ExCUTded I Expanded
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed 19244.72 19244.72 14383.80
Existing I 11507.04 ( 0.00%) ( 25.00%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vet: 1 7737.681 1 4860.921
------------------
------------------
Project: Frank Lee
ICUT I FILL ExCUTded Expanded
-----------------------=-------------------------------------------------------
Project Totals: 19244.72 19244.72 14383.80
Average Shrink/Swell Percent I 11507.04 I ( 0.00%)I ( 25.00%)
------------------------=------------------------------------------------------
?roject Net: 1 7737.681 1 4860.921

Site Balance Report
Grid cell size: 3.55 by 3.57
Original drawing scale: 100.00 ft/in
Project: Frank Lee
Drawing: Drawing 2
Number: GHF048
Location: Johnston Co.
Bid Date:
Engineer: G. Pettus
Owner: F. Lee
Estimator:
---------------------------------------------- -
----------------------------------------------
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Date: 03/29/94 Time: 10:17:18
Final surface: Proposed
Initial surface: Existing
There are no "Proposed" structures.
Fill shrink/swell percent: 25.00 Cut shrink/swell percent: 0.00
Balancing to 0.0 +/- 10.0 cubic yards
delta
Cut
Fill
Cut - Fill
0.000
19244.72
14383.80
4860.92
0.718
17543.54
18331.76
-788.21
0.618
17776.98
17776.07
0.91
Raise "Proposed" by 0.618 feet.
i

Inclination: 20.0
2 Magni ication: 10.5
Orientation: -45.0
- 11t11111ti11ti1 ,�V �"`rr++1! �
,,,,,. 11ti11 titilti1titi111 •
`�`'``� tlltitititititi11t111`t�titi1111111 ` + ,,,, �`
_ . t111tititi1tititi111t11t1ti1 �,.. ,.
56.00 % . ��tilllItititil
lll Illllt t\1t 111111
tii 1ii11tiit11 �\ ,
• � � 11111111 11111
tiltitiltil 111ti111111
54. 00 `` �1,1111111 tt1111ti1titi�1ti11111 IIt1ti1�11tlllltl�k1\N 1111
1111
. ,,�. �- tiltititillti ti111 1 1111 .. .
52.00 tltU 11111�ti tit 11111ti 111 tititil 1 111 1
��..„,�,._ - i Itilt � titilti1Sti111 titiltitit11tt11 ti1111t1t11111 t11tt111titi1 ••''`��� ,,, -,\\�''"�
50.0048.130
-:: ,i , tititit1111111ti�� ti111111
46.00
44.130'
42.00
38.00
3D Mesh Surfa
Lower Left
3D Mesh Surface
Proposed
Project: Frank Lee
Drawing: Drawing 2
Number: GHF048
Location: Johnston CO -
Bid Date:
Engineer: F. Pettus
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Times: 10:24:55

45.00
5.00
CLW
00
Report: Plan View Cross-section Locations
Project: Frank Lee
Drawing: Drawing 2
Surface: Proposed
(Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Date: 03/29/94 Time: 10:43:57
0 80 160 Scale: 80 ftiin

55.5
54.0
52.5
51.0
49.5
48.0
46.5
45.0
4:3.5
42.0
40.5
39.0
Cross -Section Plots
Digitized Points
Horiz. scale: 60 +t/in Vert. scale: 3 -ft/in
Project: Frank Lee
Drawing: Drawing 2
Number: GHF049
Location: Johnston Co.
Bid Date:
nger: P.. Coeer: ottus
wn
Estimator:
[Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK Date: 03,29.94 Time: 10:48:21
6 - 6P
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........................................................................
..................................................
............. . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed
.........................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................... ............ ................................................................. ..........................
.................................
..................................................................... ........................................
............................
........................................................................................................... ... ..................
..
Exili'n"g"
............. ......................... .......................
.................................................................................................................................................
.......... ........ ......
...................................................................... .............................................. : .................................................... ..................................
467.8

54.3
52.8
51.3
49.8
48.3
46.8
45.3
43.8
42.3
40.8
39.3
37.8
Cross -Section Plots
Digitized Points
Horiz. scale: 60 +t/in Vert. scale: 3 +t/in
Project: Frank Lee
Drawing: Drawing 2
Number: GHF048
Location: Johnston Co.
Bid Date:
Engineer: Pettus
Owner:. Lee
Estimator:
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Date: 03/29.,94 Time: 10:53:5
B - B,
..........
....................... ...... ....................................................................................................................................... ...........................
................................ ............................................................................................ ..............................................................................
Prop sod
.......................... ............... ...........................................................
.
.................................... ...................................... ............................................. ..............
...............
..................... ........................................ ........... .................................................. ............................. ...........................................
Eris ing
........................................................................... ................................................................................. % .............................................
........................................ ................................. ................................................................................ ............................
4

UNITED STATES SOIL
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
AGRICULTURE SERVICE
------------------------------------------------------------
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACIL
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME-'=°-�l� L��--
J7D_s�//nRc--------
------------------------
TELEPHONE-�°`�� 9'�--�---
lna 6 f 91s- - / 3�
SITE EVI�LUATION
rOlc /1�o,J'� Quad-uha e'No,7q 31
750
LOCATION_ 52J°s8T1�1y�o��--
SIZE OPERATION---7�0------
_ so 2W!5.L—
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY
PRODUCER -----FT.
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES----- NO -
If yes, SCS cannot provide assistance.
ew S
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" /
PERENNIAL STREAM? YES---Y NO ----
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION ,/
OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES----- NO-r-
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board
about required permits. Permits must be obtained prior
to design approval.
Are utilities in construction area? YES-Y!�-- NO ----
If yes, see.Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual
and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be
attached to site evaluation.)
0
Page 1
`•/9'3L,,1,4;1-,11
17 / " �1 /
30 -.Lon47iy4de
C Al C. /✓. f-Kn
l7Z1.S — 0tj
fro pe,�

WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY
NON -CROPLAND? YES----- NO -
If yes, yes, producer must complete a Form AD-1026.
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES---- NO
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF .
ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE
ALTERED UNTIL PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS,
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT.
(A copy of AD-1026 and CPA-026 should be attached to
site evaluation.)
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT
PRESENT? YES---- NO ----
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL.SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE
PLANNING AREA OR WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN
ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA? YES---- NO- --
.IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE
PLANNED AREA? YES---- NO -
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPO1jP1fANT
FARMLANDS IN THE OPERATING UNIT? YES ---- NO -
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES---- NO -
If yes to any of these questions, refer to form NC-CPA-16
for policy sources. The form does not need to be
completed.
ODOR
HAS
CONTROL
ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER .......
....PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES- NO ----
....POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF TREATMENT
VOLUME FROM 1 CU.FT. UPWARDS TO
3 CU.-FT./LB. OF ANIMAL?
....PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH
WATER TO AT LEAST 1/2 OF THE
CAPACITY?
....USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE?
/de e J To J.5 e J,S C 14
YES- NO ----
YES- ✓_ NO ----
YES- L/ NO ----
Page 2

WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND
APPLY WASTE? YES- No....
-
IF NO, DOES -PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO
MORE LAND? YES---- NO ----
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER,
CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? YES---- NO ----
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION
SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED?
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
(Attach soil investigation sheet to
YES- t�/_ - NO------
YES- --y NO------
YES-y --- NO------
QUESTIONABLE--------
YES------ NO------
siteevaluation.)
SITE APPROVED YES-4---- NO------ CONDITIONAL --------
COMMENTS
-_____
----------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID AS LONG AS THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF LAGOON CONTINUES IN REASONABLE TIME
PERIOD. UNDUE DELAYS OR HESITANCY IN CONSTRUCTION MAY
REQUIRE THAT SITE LUAT ON BE NVALIDATED.
SIGNATURE-- -- \ ��'--------- DATE
Page 3
CI�CCK u-'i'11
�ranl(- 4e 45
50, 1 t n 7x- m•ri�
Fran � �UAnJ

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
Landowner ee County �j o �n 6 an
Community or Group No.
Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam___7_Ft. Length of Flood Pool _3 (,'S Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation _3 /d- 9�/
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est:.E ev. :Est.
Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width: Slope: Land Use
Improvements
Above :Floodwater
Above
Flood Plain:
Flood Pl.ain
Ft.
Ft.
%
Ft.
Ft.
1 : Ype D
b
3� dy
D
All
vp
Da
ioo
3 W00
3oo
,S re ek
.
Breac61
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach D,,, ;,I ��� �.� �' a6����/nR a;�,u� y,
d J A
00 LY A nn A, .3C0/ 7 rctj.A Wzcdf Cred , Af" -I-XI-5 is
Hazard Classification of.Dam (j� b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification q) II, III, IV, V) 414acwn C4s5
By
Concurred By ` ' — C-
name(title)
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date 3 -/6 - yy
Date //— 9

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical assistance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person responsible for
approving the design. Most farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies.' This data sheet is to be used for recording
'the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard classification. Where there is a possibility for loss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure,,an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are made by evaluating the possibility
for -loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if the dam
should suddenly breach --that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out. It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
released equal to the height of the dam. This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it moves down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should be evaluated for a sufficient distance downstream until
the estimated flood level will no.t cause significant damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings, roads, utilities, reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess of the flood plain; however, in a narrow steep. valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is to compare available val.ley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any.questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.

7.
92
W�3
FE
�
93
100-
93
D
Ic
fR 92
c
75
11991199
36 6
51
2
M
N V
176
em
;E
11C e %
Ch St John
06
F low
am
IMP
D- -c ;-
0000
ET
915
'S14
20'
3913
3912

�. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r
Owners name--: F,, e c County ; )y,
Mail Address-: !. ;-i 7 �.,.,� i�cncl Rrl =o�� Da/c't //G _ 2 --Z
Type
of
production unit----:
YX??-O
Type
of
waste facility-----: %y��r,-p�jj�
/A�ns7e TiPa7Ntrr�/ L aaoo
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the`waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be -
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all p..lant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize -the value
of nutrients for -crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, ,the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than -30',days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste .is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or.less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
g� go animals x tons waste/animal/yr= S 97_ tons
total waste

A,n' ount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
J2 SSO animals x Z,3 lbs. N/animal/year = 66 2y lbs./yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every b
months.
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop Yield Lbs.
N
Acres Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type
Per
Ac.
Used
Apply
orFWo -
5o1oL1i ray
(L
z,
SnCiIrk-,
/Ga.c(
,,
SO
NVW &FOur ,
F o
S6D
UN
0.i
eS'pt o
16G
r
orb IC
Co
�,
/ 0
OSb
Aws��-
�i3
S)
BOCC�IG._
G;1eu
a�10
r
u s
old
tOa M
o f
s.
0
y
^Fr.
/Je
3
/.,,r� wro
Coe^
6, 22
23
Total
Available Nitrogen nr�
Su-r us Or Def i c i t r) r)
Necc� To c
Narrative of Operation:
0 Gl ILOi./t /rl !r :7C/
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application' rate prior to applying
waste. e/
Prepared by:
Concurred in b
Producer
s CT -i 9
Title Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
3 -a)-?
Date

� 'ar-.)[ � ry *'' :. ,:. Val;_. ''G:�:{•,='t.;..ogg' Ov ,.. �
IT r': la f.Y'i3'r}fr , ;r�`' r . r : _`y vi>:•
�%: ',- r' :S' 't►•?..J>'S!}�"`.h•- no-YDfi'rS."). 5►' � ,.rip �..
-� •, •r� + t31 TDy • j0' ry'`•r +•y '; � S^ + m{. r , - ff/�t�
.; -., '�^ C• r ":4'' Y-' t • r a r• 1 .,.yr
_ � �' S j!�'Y1..�;cf'•� ar . iLk '� ,�'., 1� K,���t r r'N'J •�.
9� � t r :V11�+'t � ��', +.1•� - D � i}J�`; ,'�� ti•,�� t7,r +� � •,�C
' ` 1t e �.•' `1 iy �'i YJI.: + Yt-S'}*%t. `'+ rC:\ \ > .•K�i.,�.�7tx7
�`�PP +':`•i lit '. •�„"'' t ej�.fX:"r � a )� �.��Y � ,,:,�a�—.,•��,.t '�.Y.{5���.
I _- !� 1 r r~ ,� t/`�,t. ..,.rk�ti• t��f7 �?�r^". 1�;1,�,• ' � r.;�it' t '� r .r� ��y`�"�\ .rk,•Q+�_�Ci'
`� '� '� 4 � °,taC:. �'..� . .-:.:;� . a • 'Y k}�Y'• F '� ' • t�i�wo t_14,3"k� •sY� \ i•�\ ,
'i. gj1�yN�IV � 1:7 a . �At r ��is il•t �} lJt. r3� . F.,LCi...�k �� x � ,r -�,�\r�.6. � ,1 a.'� �.J� f, � •'�t ��"`i
} JF• Ty±ve� .� tti r '11 ` Y7.-• .l.L `. ` iii \�%i t` �J dl� -,� (� f 1` d . ` .?Ytisffia�'.�"G
I{1fI`xt}_)1tw J-i. Y q S )• [V � jti a v ._ + ��� P,jSt"iy _ rti�.zr'�Jf"� ` :r\I M ►r(��tw'•!�� -Z` `�
�•� d ti�i r • r � .f+7 f.. ,� .'7 f•
�4 i� `n"r ') 4r �', q1 /r �; � � r �•, .p" � r }.'J5',,:y` ~y`vi \'-�r.'/�' t�wq � •�,'�
r•"V•'•`{'"��.F ��`�'i' "1• ►j� •t.: � ir/ � !y -l.�S kr; i1•{::)!7�� �' .'4'�
•t� ef•:'rr; t%\� "tF�',w•� y f .., J 4 i �a•� f•:�- /Jh \\!��1 � }\ :-•
.�' •��i�t ,[yj �[" y� j//���jH-`�).{�,ly� 'J{.�� t i Ni��)�y.� �{`"' � �j .(�: ,,] 1�rfr��,y',�J .�fr• �... .
.'\p •: t'1 V�Yr. z� _ wi\�/.� i �S. '. •!aQ�±.Y:'.Ol •-IN �'%t� >a:'���� i AL'h7�Slihr�1`Y.. .,Yf r4�'•S� •� • i-A'>. :R1i�i•�� •'�
Y\ J'. �l• �,/i ' '1 wz;
•:sY'W�7�`^'� )�� f ') �T. � mot' • �r_T�
r
5
Tw
r �I 1 lr f i . f77tEE•tt'r;
IN
YM
rl G r
y •r 7 N ff- G 5
t'A' J F' '� = zr p e tn•': ..,, �.•, r�-��{.%t�l;� fry r e� J' � �Ir
{`+�..fr�ic` :' / . t �� •.. . f 4 ryr•6 ?. _ "' i: 7'
�'^' �;ML=..:w :is�, '!t)1, fr/ �y r4' �•1���•- t. ar„�y�.� �i•
491,
tu
�nS'
,C
,t..•`t1\1+�'irf�=r� .f_ •tit. .i }�i'• r r�`,°�`. r..
t � _ ` t L•'S 4i.1'� � ryht • �tig��rY f•.r{r . ! O'
J „ u
� _ � `t .•.r /�.a!P� �'_�tii.'��!tM ,1' ^ '-ten
� � � r �•� t .. f hey t ...?:�• _ ��
-�r.?i �'y7 f�j�i i1 � rr.: .i ��{•J�i „re��r� :6f11 jRJL� ;� T.' ,y;,T.�.t�. ''� 3' �;�'� �� i
c,� t �� � jj � �. . J }�� `��.' �ff •�a � � � j.�;6`,f . � •J�^,�•r � `}� ��►j+
w.t \,I'��A �•�t`�y� .. }/�.{�jt(j t o r * .. S� � + r % ..:C:
.T.-t4��jl. _ � �1 f •�J[CN. f S j ' T! 7xr _. l- t
4t.Y
13
VA
Ls
;�` r �• }�'JS7}} dh +tl)�'`,1,• )V " � .�+x � r 1' �(_\y':y:�-�y� f
06
, S��'r. !' .�i'�flrT•. rf� t 'r •, � ()/,y.�"t ��iJrf�Ri"' f.'kr�7
y.•.J_` �, � -ti-• t+ ass � ►..'j�yy r• tF tNr•+.. 1- l�r�li'(' � ��r•`t +f.' 1'1/�Jr 1'�Y�'i7�?
_ ►rYvr- �!f � �,{'�C�t `,,��aiAf7 t.'` gtJy, 1�333�'��'''''�f {�'\Q.ty �//•'r ��.��,�c'ify�-.,7
tF.Ii r •^I1 J _.t:frJt�7•'!L,yJ!,}�/o:^- )___` }'V'i`'%•`!t')'S'.}"?. y{`vro. .Ji[iir..`+2 '4]a..

f.
93V - y93;Z
114:1"ct 7 L
%1%c.l,5c7 15v
ays C-7 Pry.
Lei,({ l�ec/ 7 c, Ta✓LIIFr
1,19 I71,,) lUeazle- 96-) �PS1
-2,3 X oZ3 % S3 3 IC/
ays- �Pn� x (D /`/]pv
7 yg
J
15�, 2 cu Vii-- --

Fran Z
SOIL IRRIGATION ACRES USABLE.
ZACT ELD# ACRES TYPE GROUP RATE/HR LESS BUFFER AREAS DEDUCTED .ACRES
�Zy
ly, 93
Nor
6
yo BArC
.sb Cover
'J��/ 2-
J
IkN
00
Ra1ns
19
oue
✓•
3'80
2
/5,y3
/Jc�11�
6
.�i0�o�c�
s yo-1 ti� �.: ---;40, s
-----�_._.._----
�6p� x7s
-_ �' o
---------
a�s
/a, oo �•tc
--.... ._ . _
— l' %5 hC
��S
Sark----------
sde o�
!�!•5b
G�)eac�
/y
�T�fid
.41DO x 95'
J
�0 Cove
3
19.Z3
Noll
1 i� }'75
•DO
/6,23
yrCI�
�
i✓5-�prC .
'70 Corr✓
r
I

Acrri-Waste
Man ement
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
..LIVESTOCK (BASTE SAMPLING,- ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATIONRATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAti.PLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot:Manure.
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.;"
ii. From storage
a, Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under.the surface•'crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic -collectors.
B. .Liquid .Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a, Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on. both ends into
manure to pit.. floor.
b. Seal upper end,of conduit (e.g.. by placing a.thumb-over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower"end..remove
and .empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic -container.
c. Take:subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. hix.and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or -tank
a. hake sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure =
chopper-agizacor pump.or propeller agitator. �-
b. Take subsaroles from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump=•_:y
or from manure., spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
J �Y••w.LF ,.. r
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Department, North Carolina State University,Raleigh. NC.g ArW.
m•.=

•qCv
ti"•a',
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample concainer.
C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample concainer.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less)'on end of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within 1' of•liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon. mix, ,and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample concainer.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter.for areas of varying quality, e.g..
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g.. if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, cake I subsample there and the
ocher 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c.•At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down co
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about-2-3 •lbs litter to a'nonmetallic sample container such as
a 11gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix. add 2-3 1bs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.
9

� i Y
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Vhitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO —
3315 Vinton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F.-Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Vaste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward_.$4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid; sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N. P, K, Ca, Jig, Na.
S. Fe, Yn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: Dh, Ho, Cd, Ni, Pb
P cr

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE APPROX. SCALE ill = 1320f ,JOHNS:
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
�U$Oa.$C$.f0al wOaTH TEXAS
COOPERATING WITH
STATE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION4.
L,V t• Y v` 'rl+T of
.•„C 1� '11Y- �'i �AYIi. .L�IY�. t 11•�' W:•?� 4 .7.. h A ,Y'} t ,j .� C 4 .
_l. 1• t o 'Gt�,y r /"r4 ,% r 1 v x� ,)r�`a.�1 7r A i
r br ?'tc rr 1 a. !.}'. ,.•r•
• z.- /Cr Y a r + . �{S • � � z � t � � � 'S,v.•• ^.� �� L` r`��.. '( x Y Y� :, •+r;I
�`i•�t � ^!,�
.,{..,j 1.:. i�. • • '�I R i�.r �4s.Yrl4� y,"4�asF w,�•'ti^VF. M°• 's.J +•.'� �..;y^i+r(9�',,
�f ti%•� ^ .St!tE''. �f � � +; 7F_ L . yy �;�iys�1,'t�•\t •f1f� t: f✓•(� j Yh � � � J�r -�
>ir � {.•�I • !r
:.� '� f � ems',,' ,�'. ..• �. �`. 'S' � '.1 �'�r '`'* , t .�:� �� .,./..
y '! � X� a b' i � /,� '� Ci;� a, t 1 , �,y 44kJ�b;. •,{. ` . .
Q,t � s �'„ , ��.",�• .S ��r � 1 4� � 770� ,;{ a �730�' � ,.s
i �'4i�'' - �!t._ � r i•17. , * ,•: 1. �-� h '
h�•�y` � t� t r+'��� j�l""i,1 E • 1 ,( � x: 'f9 .�•;• : '�` t. k '^•�. „ to �,
���,�� , ��• t r ;
:�fE r "T'� ��'•��'•�• �,� i9J�
WG _a Q `� / •� `.. �`.i �, ,t� -:}-
`1'f" �}o...: •oz ,., .i y %' .� l:. Ji ` �Q• i '.73Cg QC»y r ,� ,j• a
i r0 Yti &, l 7J0
t IN'
I'm
't' v4s' A _ h�'•,���� 1K1: •� �!•i .�t1..'.V�t: {a i/ 'i{( j���jj � 7t ;�'_ .4'j t }r'T
It-
1
X"
+C � =:rS��� r=► t � } _~'" 1.370A �T � F ? ' �� l��"� e � \`r �9R
si�'\:Y�' ��¢ ' ' ^ • 5?�V�i �{sA F r �..ri• f f _` y K�,�.`��� � .q '• , r`d�{�--%.. "�
�- � �-+ V i.. S � i 7f l ►'+• �Q r•��f �'�: ' b •n �/X.w "ttatt•��0�
.t�)�•f � r a'r fCS �s)��[ , '.�'',' tt f. A 730
/4.0r. jG 3joA 'try ' K
irM
ti r i
♦ � .y , Y' � '?'� �t.t :. _ .as. .1. ��..�r - �y ._ `:;;.I' sf�?1 �N,- ' �1 .. - .. .... ..a_- L
r 4J
1
ti
P
•I•�IY�`U'3��'.iFr,J``.ar'r:�,`?'Ria.�JX-J•/ �6� � cf1 .rq t>Fgi;�pT ,
s '1 v,t"%!•`.•ti; '•t'y 7R'�••� -"' •+mayrL q�jt• filr.. �o
WIN
:� : o
.s^ y+^ {a.��� %�, Via:.: ;lr.� .j•i`yd� C i„�!'!'{ �R'` ',s i ; f A ..
ibY L„'•a"r� �'+.'W�T-�_ C' S '�i! • A '11t�ti�4� �Kl7l�a �• .. '.f � .

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Swine production 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers
14 Recommended best management practices
JT Good judgment and common sense
Animal body Dirty manure -covered JJ Dry floors
surfaces animals
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors 0 _ Slotted floors
11 Waterers located over slotted floors
O Feeders at high end of solid floors
O Scrape manure buildup from floors
O Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection • Urine O Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
pits . Partial microbial or scrape
decomposition O Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust
fans
• Volatile gases
• . Dust
M Fan maintenance
Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
• Dust
J9
Washdown between groups of animals
19
Feed additives
O
Feeder covcrs
Mf
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
easwg
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
O
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
O
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater 13 Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon 13 Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits with
liquid while pits are filling anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
O
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain
• Agitation during wastewater
17
Box covers
collection or
conveyance
junction boxes
End of drainpipes
• Agitation during wastewater
p
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
at lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emissions
tff
Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing
0
Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation
O'
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
19
Minimum agitation when pumping
O
Mechanical aeration
O
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
• High pressure agitation
J$
Irrigate on dry. days with little or no wind
nozzles
. Wind drift
R
Minimum recommended operating pressure
21 Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second -stage lagoon

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Storage tank or • Partial microbial 13 Bottom or midlevel loading
basin surface decomposition O Tank covers
• Mixing while filling p Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial 17 Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid level
surface decomposition Q Remove settled solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or
Agitation when spreading
O
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader
Volatile gas emissions
17
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
0
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
p
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
O
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
• Carcass decomposition
0
Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal
• Carcass decomposition
0
Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
disposal pits
0
Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators
• Incomplete combustion
0
Secondary stack burners
Standing water
• Improper drainage
X
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities
. Microbial decomposition of
from facilities
organic matter

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: . Available From:
Swine Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge —Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88 NCSU—BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush —Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33 NCSU—Swine Extension.
Environmental Assurance Program; NPPC Manual N.C. Pork Producers Assoc.
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agricultural Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs. to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids -from
gutters as designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids X Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation 9 Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage O Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed O Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or
providing adequate containment (e.g., covered bin
for brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding Accumulations of animal C3 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
areas wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure Accumulations of animal 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
handling systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North.Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
CO Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 1060168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
�( Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996
L-