510030_PERMIT FILE_20171231

JVJ o f tys v311311f
� `° � '„ � Divi§ion�o�Water Resources
Facility Number '� - �* ,D�ivisiun of Soil nct Water Co�servalion
MW
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: ( Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: B:Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: p(,(/tijy K�rnp f}�yjM Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: t{, 3 Wof I PN r!I�1opfrk,
Facility Contact: f Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative- &eni— �� Integrator: 641dlbo(o
Certified Operator:y„Q� �, �COf1��aGiy Certification Number:
Sack -up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes C>_j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 5� No
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

facility Number: -ap 1Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[SrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
r5rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): C&A--]1✓ , —� `
✓
/tl7i�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
['No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
0 NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
D3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
CK No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Farili Number: - Date of Inspection: ?+
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA 0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes (gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �KNE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
'K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34, Dan11 IV 11 hrs C-ONLYIli eJ- b - � -eu( 0-t-he w,
eJ ��'`G0
`trsi� _ s1Ld �.a 1 ) ya ''/o,
C6 o � �rl vcP� is
r
��► C�I� br - aoI Reel-1,,.$70 m a7s -� ct�rl� �r� - 3aay�►�� 530
V*_ Anotys0 s© 146
g611 I1 VV001.4 o 9ft-e corm )R R as -For 4ife ryi crol 34) I�►s Qc��Ca��.
-7 I p1j, WOCc 367
,�I Is111 IV00 bVip
11DO117 WOO gW
Cad Abrio iv iM 6,_ s q b m iA4 a "0Q.1 f oj$'wk cPn oaf- h�� cr,
KVF WOO
II11y Is uP date,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: aa)'Iibntio-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:„�,Q(,k
Phone: "f �q; 7qj_ ya3 y
Date: o $
11
21412015
Page 3 of 3 U t } ��';'� �Pr� yl-1

ers >ar�fS Da-�a-O�tZ,
Oivfslon of Water Resources
Racitity Number � - 3Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
QQ ether Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: j ,"t,�p Departure Time: County: Region:W
Farm Name: Koem? aaO/M
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: L133 N0/ r
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: t'#cI�.elj Title: CblSuj�` Phone:
Onsite Representative: Ufm+ Hffzhct - Integrator: (00lysb o pillila
Certified Operator: 411Ql MhJ2004 Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
C►►attic Capacity Pop.
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dr, P.oultr.
Design C►urrent
C+a acit Pao
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
$$
Qj
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Beef Brood Cow
er
f
urke s
urke Poults
ther
Discharmes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Z] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes K�No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 30 jDate of Inspection: 'a Q
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 31
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
f�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
t�g] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
150 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): W hfA So
13. Soil Type(s): L hb
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
'�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E,�d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
U] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes � No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -3Q jDate of Ins ection: 0310111-1
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes t5a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
F7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
15a NE
❑ Yes
[)3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Co No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
21 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
[a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
[�[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments'(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/.or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility°to.better explain situations (use additional pagesasnecessary).-
!�'�anny i0lI n� x-'^ & Arscot�,4 ep - b�
41?fIao1S cj_so��C4
'
a7-f � C� Rv$ lfl�l,b-30o�a ��1
ati- l
a� �e �4n�y �� s�, l
W00:)7-7-7
w00510%j
a 1� 11p
��Iq11�O
3') l � � t r s4
4, j�e►vlvas�e PIS
�v���3a
W00110.gImIfp
Boa
wowci�
/�
jjl0atlp
Ii
�,37
ui.T:�c�1n
�1001
S Y T
O'IIMIn� 1's v;Q�od�3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: TOon Schne(er T Phone: U1 -19(- 0A39
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: VDate: ab 1, a o n
Page 3 of 3 U 21412015

0 WS a 11q'4 Z_vs
Type of Visit: I$fCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Z Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: f30 Departure Time: ;3 County: Region: RPQ
Farm Name: Donny Kolneqay
Owner Name: Dal)o4 'nLoq(j y
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: 433 h (k, U _ , I
Facility Contact: Q/pn+ Mr&iI Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: re44 Integrator: Colds b6yo
Certified Operator: NA'iel Ko_heiay _ Certification Number: IM0
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number;
Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Design Current
Cattie C►apacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
01no
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
DI. Point . Ca aci P,o
Layers
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Ot
Other
Turke s
ey Points
Other
Discharees and Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[] Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
Eg No
[] NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: 51 -30 jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
1w 9a
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes CE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Colo. NPAI Sn u i�eoc
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
1�5 No
[] NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
[]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[5? No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[RNA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412014 Continued

aciljNumber: - 3 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E�. No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes f� No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
[�4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes [50 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes U No []NA []NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question'#):'Explain any YES'an'swers�andloraany Additional, recommendations. -_
Use drawings of facility to better.explain situations (use additional, pages;as.necessary);
wk cai nvrllj� ek by-t�e e-jd mf a01 S,
aS�Sr�9e.si<r✓� �atitslM�,sl�dye�ep`�h� �1 P J 4jttz&kEL--
Cenl�_ p'�.d f`f
a�
�
le
101a$Jt5 YVMT_7� q 1 Nomeovss�jj.mnrk, aoi7al1 ialiillS-,Sanehave
�a 1301 � wOOS05t a,64 (aq,, j fm e. tttrb butiemB� may n of w Je �`e�
3igx 1S Yv00s317 ��a qs
©Ia 1 r WOO ZY0 a.3� ca,3� �edse. ro)f Uor yveId f ar sfra�►6 ends,
all;S VvOC) y�or % 13 3,1a)
--Geld
s S.
p 4 cr Z w ICJ Qsfio�a in ���
Reviewer/inspector Name: �'[� SAn-ei er Phone: Qi9 7��-ya3,y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 of � 11. r,st- �Qi Slgi� +' ,f ►vjerl7 . 4 a7 a l (Q ) 1,6 while : ,*j
Date:
21412014

0114S OVS I
15-
Type of Visit: 9 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ! $ Departure Time: County: VAfyi0j Region:
1 6iIs�l3
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: bUAnV Kweja j Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: y 33 WOr Ley W , Pf On ce.�,
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator: &Idjh o 1�11'lllhA
Certification Number: 11g q? o
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle
Layer Dairy Cow
I INon-Layer_ I Dairy Calf
Design
Capacity
Cnrrent
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
g$
Dairy Heifer
Design Current Dry Cow
Dr. P,oulNon-Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Non -Layers Beef Feeder
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Pullets
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes CgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ej� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[k No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - 3 Date of Inspection: 6
.—Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): q
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [!�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [—]Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADnlieatiOn
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): spr, I- ix c I s WR Is
14. Do the receiving Irops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Callo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
52 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[53 No
❑ NA
0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
�g Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard SlWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ' ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: 50 -30 jDate of Inspection: $
• 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA [3 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes C5kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
h
❑ Yes
® No
T
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
& No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question. ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or.any other comments.
Ilse drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary),
ago, D�, KOrne�7 heels hrs cow j b�, 2ha( �
�51 Str c la�l�lry .Slide 3, �� �� Tip S� yZ
`1 �
W a� as�D�11!3 SL0,0
10110�6 w4© 6� 11101(1_ 5L0 'V6)y0
w poi 3,3�
W 0 0093 1
y WOOMOa.31
offal ! J for 5 t�f, 4J u�r>rer aor+� , POAhie, Copt P�'rors o7
]� meowv r ar k �rrrFxs �R� a� .,� air Iv i I ! b�. c Q��r� d
or M n-eek rv4, �la-1 mAc�P c ,
be awe o,1 1 sfm- ev* wogs cl . -e 4? ,P � o!
Aix a evetb doff �t MQ ►� a. wad ana�Sbja?,
n� r% ,=
p ( ��l Q`�" C�`0� / 12lc� �9dd 'a�Q� no r, n�o`�o-, 1) V, ey''l
h311I1h4 lS�70�fry. CNAf O��Piri�i�Ly'Dk1ssmd_7 ��'�Qedl�aldct�e,�a,�W�een ��r
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 190A ,�rh,3�pj-pl Phone: ��q.7gf yabb
'�1—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

•1
f ype of visit: /-) %_ompuance inspection tv vperatton fceview lJ Ntructure tvatuanon v i ecnntcal Assistance `
Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County Regionc _6
Farm Name: �y�`J �(Q( ��C{Q�Ua�(` yY� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: —Oaj[�'�e— c,r cc Certification Number: j
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design:. Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity on
Pop.
La er Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
_Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
DairyHeifer
Design Current D Cow
l]r. P,oultr. Ca �aei P.o Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts 7Non-La
Boars
ers
Pullets
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
I
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Ye�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ;7rVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes / No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes XrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V!rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc..)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): 9�1 d g,
13. Soil Type(s): Qpl Q QMaj ,4 4 o a u V
t4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes FZTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA [3 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
_Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
;2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
i;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
Fo
NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
2 L Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Waste Application [3Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tr nsfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facruty Number: Date of Inspection: Q
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [3 Yes ,E5No [3 NA ❑ NE
R.9fh`e� cif iT ty oouof compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes/�ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes JZ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes gfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes EJO'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ZfNo [3 NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes 5'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or an ,other comments'
Use. drawings of to better explain situations use additional pa es as'necessa "
�` facility P ( P g �")•
7- Ja -13 3 , ayDC? 3 , 3
31(0 f
�TyL5- 3 7 a
10 -19 0 , 3 ,,� q Sa �� 3 SDI
nx"
P aola- rV k0
-y l r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: 07ompliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: "30"/ Arrival Time: r4 Departure Time: County: 3-oh, oA) Region: l�
Farm Name• p y`
Owner Name: D y,%, f"_ K oi,yxe u v
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Owner Email:
Phone: Q i Q ! 9�3(0 — ©a? I ) "
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 6o Ids b o c O
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design C+urgent
Design
C+urrcnt
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry
C►apacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
I
Layer
INon-Layer
I
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,oultrw
Ca aci
P,o ,
on -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
IV,,Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O
21412011 Continued {
O

FacIlity Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes n/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�3—?
5. Are there any immediate/ threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
( No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
TT
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
11 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
V1 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
t6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination'?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
0 NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the a ro riate box
pp p
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements _ []Other: 10
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 i� 21412011 Continued

Faeffity Number: I -A r57 Date of Inspection:
24.pDDiidd t© facility fail to calibbrratte waste application equipment as required by the permit.
[] Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facilit ut �1't ©pliarIce w h permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
L�rNo
❑ NA [] NE
the appropriate box(es) below. 9- a 3- a O 1
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
[:]Yes
;;�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page3of3 'S 0,� e .10 eV f\ZK(' 1_2 e NC Bert"
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[] Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
;3''No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Phone: q 19 ri 11
Date:
21412011
Ca 0 1(

Type of Visit Q5 C mpliance Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I i I Arrival Time: Departure Time: r , County: �Q� Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: i)a � D i r\ �l
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = ' = « Longitude: = ° 0 6 = {1
Design
Current`
Design Current Design Current
mtpy
C►apacity
Population
C*apacity Popula#ion C*attle Capacity Population
rVvi
an to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dai Cow
an to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry ❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
ElNon-Layers
❑
El Pullets Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
PGilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other Number of Struc#urea:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from,a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes t
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
LA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: 5 1< — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
❑ No
El NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
/
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
1,72'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
E/ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
[5,510
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
/
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
�B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑lN0
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
U(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/inspector Name �� Phone: `�� Ov
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 51— Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
I(J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El❑ Design El El the appropirate box. WUP ❑ Checklists
J
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 "
Rain Inspections
❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
{ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Cdtnments and/or'iDrawin gs rs s` - A � # ;. . t
AL
�so �p m ccaaglS
A P'� '' tic Jv r, 3 PPryj
TJW*'k&� ktEexon
0CJ' VTP 0,V9 a3V
Page 3 of 3 12128104

30
Fcf Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit Q} Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: tD 0 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:�� tJ
Farm Name: _ I affin'd:& J / _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator•
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = n= 1= Longitude: = 0 0 6= N
Design Current
Design
C►urrent
Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry
C►apaciy
Population Cattle
❑Dai Cow
Capacity P
to Finish ❑ La er
to Feeder
r[3Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑ Dai Calf
to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
w to WeanD
Cow
w to Feeder
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish El Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Co
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑Turke Pouets
❑ Other I J[1 Other
Number of 5truetures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: -� Date of Inspection
U19(4-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes p1<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
[ /No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
No
NA NE
❑ ElKNc
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require []Yes
25'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
,
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
k to �, k :':. x 1. y �-, � S �,kj 1:' z � � T�" {'�S,i� �
Commentsll(refer`to' uestioli,, Ez lain an YES, answers and/or an recorhmendattons or ari other: comments
e 9 P Y Y , rt Y --b �, �Z
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) g r�
. yAa Azrk-
Reviewer/Inspector Name (— Phone: �+,,«�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /1_ Date: or V
I
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box, ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
FINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
¢1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
[:1 Yes
V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other lssues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[a No
/yNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additionalj�Comments and/or�Draw,ings: {
f 01.50 /o g
7//.Y/0 f Av: 5, 3 0 3,s
&C �Q}.I a'y\
' a co o
V ' 12128104

F
peof Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
A z
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County,�L+*v RegioZ
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = f =it Longitude: = ° = 6 = «
Design Current
Design C•arrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
+
Whet Poultry Capacity copulation
Cattle C*apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑
La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non
-La er
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑
La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑
Non -La ers
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑
Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑
Turke s
Other
11:11
urkey Poults
❑ Other
❑
Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
/No
[INA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ElApplication Field ElOther�f
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2 N
[I NA
[I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
PJ "o
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of InspectionI / q
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes4<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes /io
ElNA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes X`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ElYesX61 El NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need []Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ((No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ From those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
tN
[3NA
ElNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
*'�i +, �?r...etseto qushon #)�:xplam any YES„anwers and/or anv recommendations orMany+other coinmentsawtngs otaciiliidit oval pales as n`e essary,)t vs.
�K�66r
:.tlt��.`a tsr,tt nx:i;'w m wtE,.k�"�' a? c;;t:�.
i
7
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: r
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 112128104 1Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents_
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes JQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ /
w u r Checklists Design Maps Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes XfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes No
El NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ;ff'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes _P�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes o
(((ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [:]Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[3NA
[:3NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal??(No
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
LJ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings;
1;V0
k✓w-N� 1 I / a
0/0g a�y e-, a,y
'-115?310c 3 ,
y
D *)
cloij
. S r.
Page 3 of 3 12128104

-7, f", —,
'-c6n•ision of Water Quality
Fae ity Number I 3 �,Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11 3,2 Arrival Time: Departure Time: 0= County: S0+1NS7 CN Regioa. __
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name: DQ n n V��� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsitee Representativ Integrator: U
Pertilflli�dOperatl'oorvc�� �4 Ra (,w 2 Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = I = {f Longitude: = o = 6 = «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
JjDQ ❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity' Population'
i-.
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Daia Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non-Daify
❑
Beef Stockei
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes X�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;!rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EJ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 23"No
❑ Yes
❑ NA ElNE
❑ Yes -CJ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Xf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) l
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes )21"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ,WNo
El NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[__1 Yes ,C] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes 9lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment`?
El Yes gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
ReviewerAnspector Signature: 12 Date:
f 12128104 ' Continued

1^gj--�7Y'
Facility Number: _= Date of Inspection i
Required Records & Documents
19. D. id the facility fadha e Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Do s the facility fay to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Vaste Applicationekly Freeboard Waste Analysis oil Analysis �ste Transfers Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
P1, o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
�No
ElNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
KN
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElIQ Yes
No
[I NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
/
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
KN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Dom- e5alu
a 5� _ 3 1
91'7 1 sue, P ON
�
1r� s r7 L/ 7jtk
pAr-dtft-6 "'42 -"0 IneK -IV% INIvIA-D —
12128104 U

{ ;j Division of Water Quality ;
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit V Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Veederto Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Sack -up Certification Number:
0
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Pouets
❑ Other
Longitude: =O=i
4
Design ;' Current
Cattle Capacity Population-.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
ElYes
-Dlo
El NA
El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
I I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
I I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge'?
12128104
Continued

�r Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check �es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes% -Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings.,
A-&1b�d�
❑ Yes
Z�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _ ❑V* ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rS=jf Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

.. lFatility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yeso
$Z'
❑ NA
El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 3no
❑NA
❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes 'PIo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Ye o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes -*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
. maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or r0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) —
13. Soil type(s) —
14. Do the receiving crops differ km those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date:
12128104 Continued

Division'of Water Quality & °�
Fatlttyuinber Q'Division of Soil and Water Conservation
I0:.Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
it/
Reason for VisV Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1164 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 1 /A 7 rt v /�D Y e g __ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: c ❑ ' =" Longitude:
DesignCurrent Design. Current �Desrgn �� Currents
Swine Ca aci Po ulatton Wet Poultry Capacity Po ulatton Cattle Ca aci Po` elation
p tY : p Y p Y p h.p h. p
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
ceder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Lalurkcy Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
4
Number of Structures
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /N[3
❑ NA El NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo
NA [I NE
El YesEl NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Av cility Number: Date of inspection J d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): C' t!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes TdKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 55 Structure 6
❑ Yes Nc ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentaeEl
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No El NA El N E
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application '
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Z�IEI NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) µ (161 _ �) ih r'1 -4 t
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
d❑NA El NE
❑NA ❑NE
o❑ NA❑ NI?
o ❑NA ❑NE
❑No ❑NA [I NE
Comments (refer to question #}; Explain any YES answeri and/or any.recommendations or any, other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Ak
ReviewerlInspector Name �~ Phone:
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date: , l G
Page 2 of-3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No - NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E2 <o NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VN�9,'
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes;�N�o "NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 L Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
w
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510030 ____ Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251030 1 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Eleiah
Date of Visit: 10/16/2008 Entry Time:12:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Danny Kornegay Farm Owner Email: dfk3farmslabaol.com
• Kornegay •iltil�kI�£�Y�i�
Mailing Address: 610 Worley Rd Princeton NC 27569
Physical Address: 427 Worley Rd Princeton NC 27569
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'36" Longitude: 78°10'00"
SR 2529, 1.6 miles northwest of SR 1007. Farm on northside of SR2529.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts © Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Daniel F Kornegay
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18480
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Danny Kornegay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Patrick A Towell
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251030 Owner -Facility: Danny Komegay Facility Number : 510030
Inspection Date: 10/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
_agoon LAGOON #1 40.00
Page: 2

Type of Visit Ptompliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 32rRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Gj 7 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: 'JW ASS ''" Region: RZO
Farm Name: '?ram 'i U CU Q-.-,E 6� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone: G1 ri 2Z, I I Z �-
Facility Contact: I Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: VArl k E 6b� Integrator: CscD LSD S a a-z
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: i a S(3
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = f = Longitude: = 0 0 1 = {1
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ La er
❑ Wean to Feeder i ❑ Non -Layer
LJ i
Feeder to Finish -Z JG
❑ Farrow to Wean ` Dry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Layers
ElFarrow to Finish El Non -Layers
ElGilts
Gilts i
Boars '
El
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑
Daia Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes to No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Sj — ?�� Date of Inspection 26 v
Waste Collection & Treatment
, �
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes , No
�,1
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes PNo
[I NA
[I NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes No
El NA
El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
[[[[[[
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes (No ❑ NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement? !!
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ,❑ Application�Outsi e off Area 1 e i Za
/ x
12. Crop type(s) rsJ ,1� C. '3 W-AA - 14 4%-r Giz. y se
13. Soil type(s) �06��. t�34�t�J�Ay to C_t�G PAtl-rC 6,0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, El Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name �� �� -;j't" "aF,� Phone: r(1 S� f 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z�6 v
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 5 j — Date of Inspection`
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 16No ❑ NA [I NE
r rr
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the �� MP readily available? If yes, check ❑�yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvert��ept? If yes, c cck the appropriate box bel w. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�f'�'' 2S '3. (a A'c.DA- ,1t'7 ,o S
❑ Was�pplication ❑ Weekly eeboard [LJ Waste�a ysis ❑ Soi Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
F.�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
;�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? `L J'V'0�
[:]Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
' 25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
,y 27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
El No
❑ NA
El NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
; No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
;?rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addittonal Commentsand/cir :Drawin s
�; '
WAt'-Tf� v 2. IDwa 1CAt CG&&j NA-9 r. W 04D 773 -71z5-'og 104 f'R'0r69.C-1X
.z-1) P,-kT- Wr 3.0O tSI'k-m�a S'W Cp
C.—WiE if vr,P 4 a-! -
X J<" v4 rb+ L ;4 L- E v a D A aJ A l-ti S G S
oP f�bG+��+•�� �-o� S��D6�
z4, z5 'C>,1 .4rJrJ0At...
r
f-r}tv0� 440 FbSSr fjr t,..l fib/
TRZ's Tr+zll It
A go4w,_ CrR4-4 . p SC m,A Q-c 4 1 'VFjt" '(rAe- ­3 rC %Wl aG- _3L LV*E auXv E,)
12128104

.� Ysre ��°x'�wi . ;� ; v.1""r^,-pays, �..>.. � €.,W.. � �i.a� •?W � n �tx7'H'�w P�pr {r:rv*,�q ee 1p, y� 1 '+t,:} I F' fEi i �k� ^ a�t� ii �:
.. N'�� `4�,�,++ W �la, $.}1� rr i$ ��� �' • DryLaionof'VVater Quality` , tfg ��_. s��� {air "�q�,;t" �° r� f Nip.{' ,�i'i"€i)i �N.��t2i< r �f �-�»��ij if��
;a'�.«�rggy'"9��rr ?, l'�,. I r��`,5;.`'� ` ;.�- � � �it�t ,�Y`� s� N�y� 4 �,l,f�i•-�`f�� 3 I .�YiL f '
�► } `.�;� a , � a� � 6 ;O Divtsian of Soil and�Wster Gapservation �,. �`� � i �I i r
:G�' � '". h!'�a+ I�N �s'.E�:Y>�I�•aa �.�'' �� ,il.s 41r s 1 y % Pr-r1g i„� r tkl ,s .^"' ° 9�. I�.L s �N��Ls -.'t�
a+•�i. 9?� is k+4a � s i.,,,t Y�isd;�' d.::didlt! � k�. G� 1 ^k!r4ri', r�. w fen';::i-�+ .- 1 r i a rf �
. � s.r�� �, � air �,��r � 4 Othet;Ay�eraCy �nrliz�raft'+z' LY�a'• ,`�,1!„i'�� �� $ �' fi+4. r 'T` a � � i �R
�1r F� ')f .p r� 'Y'i�j' M*+^ �'3f�i`. F .:. i�� i .%!{�1 !{�N •t w'�,-�..,..r'
.., w -..t 4 .. » w:..l�� iM: +ti...a�. "?r''S-b:...-.�ji...�•.,.,,.�. - � �.�..�..L�«.a •�f.
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit A Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility• Number / Date of Visit:
XpermitteVbCertified O Conditionally Certified © Registered
Farm Name: po',_JrJ jt�� /Z JC 6�
Owner.Name:
flailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: IDW r-4 ".r— 64:1
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Time'3
Date Last Operated or .Above Threshold:
Count%� • zr*T',
Phone No: — 1 J 1
Phone No:
Integrator: _ �cCD fo dbL
Operator Certification Number: lA j FM
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 04 0 µ Longitude ' �
Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulatiot
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
�.
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acihr Po ulation
❑ Laver I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges B Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen ed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collectioxi Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes
r/�o
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes ? No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: s�1 — r Date of Inspection b
Required
Records & Document.~
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes � No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Aniuna Waste Management Plan readily available?
f-1I 'S �!`7
[[
❑ Yes No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, ch the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ Waste Ap tion ❑ Free and ❑ WasWAnalPsis ❑ Soil S.Pdg -2wt l-oi
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any ap ic1ble setbaccriteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes SNo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ''No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes DNo
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes [�Ko
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
Yes ❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes g(No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ,d No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? Sly)-aq
❑ Yes )ZN' o
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ONo
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [ INo
❑ Stocking Forn , ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Mi Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Facility Number: q1 — _3 01 Date of Inspection
5.4'Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes 00
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
E2 NO
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
A'No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ 190
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN [],Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Gro nd ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
-L3.s/r'-s- ►co
12. Crop type j9A LI/ AWWAi. Sc. /
�q 0
13. Do the receiving crops differ wit1iT11o1e designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ONO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Q o
9 PP equipment? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application a ui ment?
❑ Yes
]No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes Z/Xo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑Io
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes �No
Air Quality representative immediately.
w�, ins,:„ „_��,�� a�� .>;.�rr:,r:r,�� ,.,�a�r..�;�, ..vnvn a...�,,;�w €,� .:.o ara ���.°,�.;,�a0x�;�a:^"<a;as, s€„a��.€a, .prat, u:' �,� :•,ai _.>«��'a±u.axs:�:s _; �.c <,,;,,�:�;, s, , � s,s���}a�;, ��3.�y , � €,;�;
}�Comriaeats,�(referto.question-#) F.xplaun any YF.S;answers end/oranyw,reconupenda�onsor�any�otl%ercammeats����,;�t' �'s�'+;'��":���r
a �lfi,'t"'�s. n 9 ht..:w�.-sue <�is�wuw,t,�y��'���- tl '"� � '4i..i'C.::r� ,� 4.;.�3•".'�',ae!..:i'_ zlS�1i `�i�r.44��'.�.1.�.,fi i!, t � .r:,d
Use drawings°€of factlzty to�bettertexpla�n situat►ons (use additonal.pages as neressaryj: � Field Copy ❑Final Notes "'�����i
�&�:�(i ,!. E #' i .'�� = F,m..a "�...., }� � I!�{g€- Y .:°� �! •„ � �,§ ,. �_. E. tl.� efky u4 , �.,�, i�.. p,�$'f:?�tc.. � �gi� Y.::. ,="{� E i .� _h"., �4 -s� � .. hn� sx� ,.E� �. ,.q r,...se.s ���;.�;i:�::e?€��
„��'13��i,�,,,€���tk=.�'{'�yts.ra'%«...L�Fi?�?u..t.�a.r€1aE�k`�i3!a�.d;tr,.Fd,.�r.s�n��tr��.•��i�°s �t4,:i���.:.��:•[�3�..€�tt�a�=wltFni�+�,.:�=in,€_€'E.�,,::�€��it �.?ii�r!Pta��'M:::�i�:x.�ii!%?,,¢ �_,€"'�f�ii�`.��i1 �11r1?�aL °!$�?:ri`�i��il:�i�lh�:: i�,;�,fza�u
Fly c-r- ?T)
Sdt�Aq�.T
Mkt>.' Ri Y i i i,{ � i'}iii�'W== i € :4 '.3^ ii I' 3 i� I k '1��� iY" i IY F Y •
U.
ReVleWerRI1& actor Narne , €ii , , € r i?lit -.� a1�'p sit t % �# rTof a C� a t t q �slf'� t4s`g � �e ; � �� 3�'9�� �€s,
p, € ? at3!t.. s s, ._, ,,s. S�IrI. . a ,, , ..$4 aIn,e::±W,g
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: 4h AH
12112103 Con#nued

Type of Visit e'toompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit XJ Koutine ()Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Time: Z
.�
Not O erational Below Threshold
P"Permitted dcertifled ©Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshol
nf41
Farm Name: Aa94 6 County: __ � ors , �0 +�
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
n
Onsite Representative: 4"4'QI 3 K�j�_G � Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 01 « Longitude • 6 �u
Design
Current Design
Current: sr= m ;Design
Current.
Swine Capacity
oul
"
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE1 Layer
❑ Dairy
El to Finish
f ❑Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other,
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity :.
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
N Tota1S$LW
erof Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area
ns
j*H@%nuPondsrl
❑S ra Field Area
s
SolidM`
�__.��_pk.
❑ No Liquid Waste
Management System
"y 3
Discharees & Stream Impacts
t. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05/03/01
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes ,�No
Q
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o
)E"'o
❑ Yes
pq
❑ Yes
No
Stricture 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes zXo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) /
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level "
elevation markings? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crap type Cr,6 oN ceAz Sc,�� W'Aj41raL, t cj W ISE
2
13. Do the receiving crops differ with thosi designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (C WMP)? ❑ Yes No
IL5
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [:1 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ElYes � No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes eNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ! o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) �l,y 3 jl �n3 7 u-3 ❑ Yes _12No
2-t 9.7
:irt 9 Z
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ ir�tion, freeboard, w tpanalys s & soil sarn e rrepo s S S Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Z�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ll No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ZNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes .2�No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N '
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
VC to question #) Ex�plam any YES',aas ers andlolany recammendatians orany othe comment �; +
Use`.drawtngs of facility to better ez_p[atn situations(use ad'dttiinal pages as necessary) a'
Field Copy ❑Final Notes
19, S
i i mE vi615 ���n+.N�E.tvEA -4 41 LA tr l- TCS-'
D`D rt� Nall caL"SN4.0t 14G OPSTE. S-�fAptk, W�'a (,o DflYs
,.('jme""'jS AL-A6 Vvv WINU_.S4 Rvr No PF_-'r
1G4F1' A,r F-11C o,j it4'Zs.F_ �1Di D Tv �,E, A (-L)- Ltt=Ari�-EK- ��Ffl0�^Enlo�
Reviewer/Inspector Name - � A ,. S-71-470D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3111163
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: S I - 3 a Date of Inspection
Qdp_r Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ YesNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes j�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) /
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 9No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes No
05103101

6/ Ifidz.
Type of Visit O'C.,o/mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0CJ Routine o Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 5 36 a Time: / ¢ _�
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
.'Permitted-Mertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: DA XJ i - _ Kaa&ttlis A•`;rr County:
Owner Name. -
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: GnizDs Qx_�
Operator Certification Number: 18 4 %­�J
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry [:]Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ° Du Longitude 00 06 «
Design Current Design Current Design Current .
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder i JE1 Layer I I ❑ Dairy
El Feeder to Finish g � O ❑Non -La Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean _..__......... -
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
I .
Ho of Lagoons . �❑ Subsurface Drains Present �1❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
s 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System I
ARE 4
Discharegs reflrn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches);
05/03/01
❑ Yes XNo
El Yes fd,NN,
ElLd Yes ' o
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ Yes
9No
❑ Yes
2No
❑ Yes
Z'No
Structure 6
Continued

167 Facility Number: 5 (— Date of Inspection 4 30
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
VNO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
ElYes
i�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
V1,
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excess' Poon0ing ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Y 7S
❑ Yes
No
z !Y8
12. Crop type rS.�.rrE�- r. .r�14�L C . i3 - G any. C,--. jo
s. 9.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
VNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
XNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Reguired Reegrds & Dac m nt rr�� ,33�� qq
17. Fail to have Certificate of Covef�ge &tGe�eral Permit. oo�r root eerPermit readily available?
❑ Yes
'Co
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Cehfiticnimal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) B i6 7 9
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel i tion, freeboard, wanalyis & soff rshhple ieports)
El Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
W/No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[Z/No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
)2No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
j2No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comm nts refer to ueston # Ex lain an YESanswers-andlor an recommendations ar an other comments'.' � �' et �'�4 '°
Use drawings of facility to better explain s�tuattons-,(use additionaly'pages asknecessary) '' �iel ���
� > ti F .[ram d Copy ❑Final Notes
,,
(�+M rS CJY Mf-r-Ppw 4a%_ MAd, aF= Tk L-Z£tmLAA- T-=i C_t_'q;
pnoW,,tj
r \a,e. y.
Reviewer/Inspector Name .j •J ; cr „) r- ': r`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 I r Condnued

Facility Number: S/ — 3o Date of Inspection 5 '3 Caw
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
C-A
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
9110
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yeslo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
)Z/No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?,
ElYes
YNo32.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: ,:..
05103101

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: l$ Routine Q Complaint p Follow-up p Referral p Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:Zf kffSj (V Region: WO
Farm Name: Do PoLt to Owner Email: ,cc,"'
tG -930 �9 11
Owner Name: T)l t;t\ t\♦K t o y A e c; Q `.! Phone: 1� - I w• I to 1 '7
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: 1a f) IP K n C f\P G? �I Certification Number: l $ L(
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle C►apacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
$�
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P■oultr, ;
C•_a acit
P■o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit , Number: - Date of Inspection: /19
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1,2(N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F21�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZpNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
[] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[6No
D NA
❑ NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
J�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
25 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,ETNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,E!fNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ONE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facil ity Number: Date of Inspection: (%
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EfNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes ZNo
the appropriate box(es) below. 4811 OL I i a (D 1 S L T Z
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refcr,toqueshon;#) ExplAm any.YES answerskandlor7anyadditi
Use drawings of facility to better'explatn<situations(iise,aciditionalpagec, as n
C_ tsz. ,le, 9"N\ 1 0 af*) 0 M i e-CA
ao
C P P
� v-- -e 5 o- ij v `e-�\1 (,),en d u 1) Vv d c.t- � e--
0,`,AA-1 t\13 ',A c, FA 6 h1kZ':'� a0l
❑ Yes P3 No
❑ Yes �r`No
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes In No
❑ Yes V o
❑ Yes /No
1-Ll-0r7
07o C. T 2• (a �'�
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: "A Ck +(\ j? `` Q jam(' C"d Phone; t 14 1— L(a 00
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i��.(/�p 0"'OjXI Date: [JOLAOIl
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit .10 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 3o Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 ai 'rime:
Facility Number 0
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
.0"p-ermittedj3<ertified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
� County:'nlS!�°
.�.............................. ........ , .".................I...............Farm Name: �.�........
'I,3»
Owner Name:
Facility Contact: ....................................................
....... Phone No: ..... 6...�... 5$b 77
.....Z'�............
.....................
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:.....`x>6...�..L...S?..I....
MailingAddress:.....................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:. ...r)p.................................... GA
�......................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ......................................................
Location of Farm:
Integrator:..........A .............
Operator Certification Number:.. j..8,.y � ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
w
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 66 Longitude a i .41
Design Current
Canacift Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
eeder to Finish
Z $ O
3�
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[3 Gilts
❑ Boars
i Ota
IWE
€ Ntitnber-of Lagoons ' ' 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field
p ,Holding Ponds/ Solid .Traps'. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System _
€,
❑
Dischar� & Stream _Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ........................................................................ .............................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes
�o
❑ Yes
PIo
❑ Yes
Q4o
❑ Yes ❑>0
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes �2Wo
❑ Yes 1Ido
Structure 6
....I ........................
Continued on back

411
Facility Number: S — 3a Date of Inspection 3 c7 Printed an:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management of
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public. health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
1 /9/2001
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
WasteApplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes (�No
❑ Yes 914o
❑ Yes 10"No
❑ Yes [�Vo
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
12. Crop type e-:, Z t t_m Je A-( AA-" - 6aAz -p )/ S - 5 C AA4-AfATf S: 6' kjiWTPX_ 4Ah-IJ44-S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes r- o
14,
a) Does thefacility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑Yes 1 1"'
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes g,1No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �To
f
Required Records & Documents
7zZ'�9 $
17. Fail to have Certificate of Covers e & eneral�it readily ava�afbls?
❑Yes No
P
Qq
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Wa�te`Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 9/S�'�s s�,�rr „" "r°✓
❑Yes 09
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri�ion, frc46ard, wasteanilyss & soil s � � ple 0epo�ts)
❑Yes N
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes Flo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes , No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
ONO
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes dNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes J3'&10
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes �' "o.
yiolsiiQgs'or- 00f jcj6ja6 s •*qN_, note#• 0(trift phis: visit; - 'Y;oji Wj1 j-tee iye oo futthor
curies o deice: ab r6f this visit ' . '
ommen3. �i 7 Y
Cts' (refer to 'g0esti6fiV) a 'X I", n at+y ES answers andlor any recommendations on any other, c ih[fii
-.. L1 f
Qc. Sv�F. Tb Mi4iwl to �i�.iPcr_ _ fit' cal i'�-!� L. m;W I►
$� Sd . ,r'�SrA B4Ns-4.
_Cri2f`
m
SiC7 F
??, , .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j.,,. Date: '1 SAp

iJ
Facility Number: Sl —3a Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes &No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes VNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes VfNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ((No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes Qj No
Additional ornments�an or rawlngs,777 ;"41: i.1.
1
AL
5100

Longitude
Design a Current 4„`j
Poultry . C' apacity,,.`Populahon
IffRoutine O Com laint O Follow-ue of DW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number S 3a
Date of Inspection s 1, 7 'm
Time of Inspection ! %3 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted x3Certified
0 Conditionally Certified C] Registered
JE3 Not Oper—a—tio—n—all
Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .......................aa'..'!`},,t%............................................................
County:.....................................................
Jn � ... ro `�
Owner Name:........... G.P:S
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address: ........
Onsite Representative: ......
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 • 2 i Z7 «
[i;";;swine,. „Canacrtv:;Piui
Title:
Phone No: 93.6 - Q$ -7! ..........................................
Phone No: j... 0 -7 -7 Z, 7
....................................................................
Integrator:...... �.Si LpSCa R �..... ol� U:!. f ...........
........... I.... Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
A
......................................................... ........................... ......
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Z-gg1
-Z,%em
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Non -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water 01' the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............'�.......................................
�.. L................................................................................... .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes O/No
❑ Yes ,�No
❑ Yes t�No
❑ Yes Ef No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes Z No
Structure 6
❑ Yes )Z/No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number: S1 — �� Date of Inspection iCl
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ZNo
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes )E!fNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes )RfNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes ONO
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes P "o
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes 2�0
12. Crop type 1•4t- SALK ,CXI. CAA n3 W rJ . A JJJ,4L 1� CdZ4 1w
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (C P)?
❑ Yes '0-14
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ,01N'o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes 21Na
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ONO
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �No
Required Records & Documents 9123'71a
have
17. Fail to Certificate of Coverage & Geneiial P rmit readily available?
❑ Yes OINo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes No
�sample
2NO
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri ation, freeboard, wasteLanalysis & soil reports)
[]Yes
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ,dNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes PNo
22.. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
ZNo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes P'No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes �`No
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ta/No
Q yrQlp, 17"rggS.O�' c1 fiC}enC�. . . . )noted. d�rrtng this visit'. Y'oo Wili•teeoiye i) futtt$r
corresp6ii&6& ab66f this vi..........................sit.` .
S� r-4✓1','uJW 40'r It (-.%)•r 69A-sS Or'
?,.t a o s sq�- Hcpfr A ^tc> fD" v G Wr-
I Rtr 1-4 fir' COP`I ar- CUM -,4T' r-.Efa&T r;� 9'ECO -0
c_
Reviewer/Inspector Name F;"".'
�, ,..., .. .:.K__ .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:�r ,j • J-A , _--j7- Date: SJ �

Facility Number: :5 1 — , �3 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 010
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes /J3'No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes )2r/N0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks, lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes �No

Dtvtsibri of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation,-! Compliance Inspectiion
❑ Di'visiori of Water Quality - Compliance:Inspection t
x
0 Other, Agency,= Operation Review,,
10 routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DNVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSNVC review 0 Other __ I
Facility Number r 1 Date of Inspection / l
Time of• lnspcclion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Rehistered IMNot Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName ... ... ..... ...... .................................................. County': .....• � �{:r} t/S..a..�.%............... .......................
O«ner Name :................. ................... Phone No:..................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. I ltle:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailin_ Address: ............................................................................................................................................................... ..... ............
Cnrsitc Represcntative:— ��1;.. r'.r...�c:.z<:.�' �- lnte rauor:........ G`. .:.%:,..J. �..1.��`. �-..
CertifiedOperator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location ol'Yarm:
Latitude • ' �• Longitude • �` �••
Design Current
"Mine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
2FEeeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farro+v to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Bears
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other f
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lage�on Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps jr7o Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-made? ❑ Yes No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes � No
c. lif discharge is observed. %vhat is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes/ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes r No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes r-T
0
S1rL1CttrrC ] Structurc'_ Structurc 3 Structurc d Structure J Structure
ldenlifier:
Freeboard(inches): 3-..............................................-.................................... I.................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑yes 16 Na
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

.t Facility Number, ')_— t3 0 14 [rrstnvclion
6. .Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste manaLenlent or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
R. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
%Va,s[e ;application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'.'
11. Is there evidence of over//application? ❑ Excessive Pondin�; ❑ PAN 1 .
12. Crop type :.t lA /%A / �L� l SG' //� 1 / � I�— C" L j-5 3
13. Do the reccivin�� crops differ with those designated in [lie Certified Animal Waste Managetnertt Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre dem-minallon?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
]ZL uired Records & Docurnent.c --
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
IS. Does the facility fail to have al: components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. denim, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement`? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste&aiysis & soil �afitple reports)
20. Is facility not in compli.mcc with any applicahle setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP•?
�: o yiolai'roris;or-deficiencies 4ere ;n6te¢• db.6ng Ibis:vis . - Yoif witl•eeeoive Rio: further: :
corres}�otideni c'e. about. this .visit . . . . . . I . . . . . .
{
❑ Yes o
10 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes pfl-40
❑ Yes 7o
❑ Yes 77NO
❑ Yes ZfNo
❑ Yes EYNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes y"o
❑ Yes pl�PD
❑ Yes �'�Io
❑ Ye'�ra
❑ YesNo
El Y'eso
❑ Yes do
❑ Ye< NN0
❑ Yes Q'No
El Yes El o
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
?, rtIC-6-0 7V �� En �J�G- T�0�-5!r?��5 �i� y r �� a� Lc`55 `
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,�G`/gi T.
r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature; Date: �cJ J� Gj
r2 -t roo

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes g No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 9(No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ffNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ff No
L
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yeslo
3123/99

p Division of Soil: and Water Conservation - Ope6tion Review `
U Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
,Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection '
© Other Agency- Operation Review
1Q'Routinc Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DS%VC review Q Other
Facility Nunnbcr� Date of lnspect.ion a 9
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
RfPermilted'Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not Operaational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: �l nt,a►.` .....r�.c.��+si£ �? .... � County: %J.q.f. STa!�l...............
Owner Name: Phone No:
FacilityContact : ........... ................................................. .................. 'l'itic:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: .......................................................,.......,.,................................ .......................,.................................................
Onsile Representative: r.�... �!�1�.r.4?A.�!.,.!y'n1 tf...Ui1J�2Lf`jjntct;rator:..............:....�o�....(!'?iL.l'.....7.......
1 G o .... ....
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:....i.. ... . '.c2..........
Location of Farm:
......................................... I.......................................................................... .....................................................................................
Latitude 0 9 " Longitude • ` "
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
ggi,
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischaEges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance nran-made`,
h. Il' discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
C. Il' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
❑ Yes 21�o
❑ Yes�No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ONO
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of' the operation? [:]Yes ZNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes W�No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes WfNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 1 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(iirchcs): ...,......... .....,........................................................................................................................................................................................
1 /6/99
Continued on back

Facili y Number: .51-- 3O Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and.the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12 C ro t e G. B t P-AkJ 9 !s 5 M, G aA>.J
� 3e
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes 1P No
❑ Yes 2f No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes ;eNo
pyp................................................... ,........................................................... .......................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ZNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage' for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
2j. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
No. vialations-or. deficiencies :were no.ked. during.this-visit::.-You wilI.re�ceive no further :
cor;respofidehee;about:thisvisit..•..:•:•.•.•:•:•:::•:•.•.•:•:•:•:•:•:•.•... .• •.•.• • • •:•:•:•:
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes �To
❑ Yes ;fNNo
❑ Yes ZNo.
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ Yes 42. sqo
❑ Yes _F�No
❑ Yes XNo
1 /6/99

Div�.slon of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Wivision of Water Quality
10'9outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other _ J
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered erti ted 0 Applied for Permit �:errnitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated :..........................
Farni Name:�..�7 /1 moo... r.n. e..4.�i' -- ........ Countv:....- 11r'..1............................................
Owner Name: Pj.f.?�!.y ..f��r n Q� ` .. Phone No:�!!.................... -...... ............ �....................
Facility Contact:...!1...................................................... Title:.................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: l`l..a...Q�:.�Q.!�1.......:.....1'/lCo.......�......a,�..<................../ / ........................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:............................................................................................................. Integrator:6Q./Cr.o.... 7..l;tl'5...ate "`s........
Certified Operator;,.DA......!-y Xo �s9.` Operator Certification Number: .........................................
Location of Farm: ., /?— 2 Yanj r
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
Design Current N Design CurrentDesign-.Curren
t
Srwine Capacit Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acit "Poi tion
n to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
-�
'=
TFee-der
,.
to Finish
❑Nan -La er
y
❑ Non-Dairyarrow
to Wean
Mf ,u. = V
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
,
Total Design Capacity
A
❑ Farrow to Finish
„
El Gilts,15
❑Boars
<_ Total SSLW
a
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvenent? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes LOJ N
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 5N91
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
II

o
F-Aility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes eNo
Structures (Lagoons —Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes . No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
.............................. ...................................... ................ ..............................
Freeboard(ft):.:..1......... ..................... ...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes dN
IL is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes /Noo
Waste ARRHcAon
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify -DWQ))
15. Crop type A!1'k 5`'�t.......: !L ��'�..lf...!�`^'k
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes wo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes o/
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q N
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
24. Were y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N
25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
lo'No.violatio'nslordericiencies'were- noted- durirtg this', visit'. - :You4illreceive•no-further- : .
corr0sp06de O about this'visit: :
Commenfer ti>gti�tlon #�xplaln anyi answers anilanyrrxa4endations;oray vher cents
�Use.drawlttgs Qf�>i3ty�tii�6et1� e.�plaict sttuah�rtr�. fuse addi[tonal�Fa�es as necessary)
AN
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' J J/ff/{y/ t g'
f �Vca..5,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r,,2 Date: 2

LFacility dumber
13 Registered 13 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
Farm Name: .........................
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection '; (JQ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
10 Not Opera Date Last Operated: ........................
CountN:..:V(.1�............................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:...................
Facility Contact: ............................................. . Title: .. Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................,r...................................................................
../......................................................
..........................
Onsite Representative:.. 4N {. o�.Jj.1 I1/�g At�..�d Integrator:... �`aA �-S..!`,�.........................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................. . Operator Certification Number;..................... .
Location of Farm:
Latitude a i " Longitude 0. 1 { G<
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Q/isio
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
VNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
�� No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
L7 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
l.d No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
[A No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
11
L�J o
7. Did the facilityfail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
P P g
❑ Yes
� ] No
7/25/97
Continued on hack

Facility Number: r —
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed''
❑ Yes
0 No
Structures (Lagoons 11olding PondsFlush Pits. etc.)
9.
is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Cl Yes
17No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
...................................
freeboard(ft): ........Q.,,.:.......f....,....................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
P(No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
7/
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
�No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
( No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
//
P type ........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑l o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
EkNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ID No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
( No
'0
No.violations or deficieiicies.wereenoted during this;visit. You:rvill receive-no-ftirther:
correspondence. about this:visit'. .: • ::
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:`///GJ �o Date:

_ 'f,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
ALT?W,A
4 21�
NCDENR
NcwrrH CAROuNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NAFURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 29, 1997
Mr. Danny Kornegay
610 Worley Road
Princeton, North Carolina 27546
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-30
Danny Kornegay Swine Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
On October 9, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
Effective -wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please, call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerel���
dy arrett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

review
Facility Number 3 O J
Farm Status: ❑Pegistered ❑ Applied for Permit
Certified ❑ Permitted
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .....................................................................................................................................................
FarmName: .................. 04N...^.'............. kA&.N..S..9.4�1....................._........................ County:.............. .._ ............... .......................
Land Owner Name:.... tiR.Ai.?..Y._.............._�+r.R.!.���'x ................................. Phone No: ....... 7....q. %,3.6 ^
Facility Conctact:..... 1✓..Sa^.N..4....... K..¢.+!A.t.gy...................... Title: ........ouwner ... Phone No:.!?...._ i�-. 72 —h
MailingAddress:........kI_°............... 0..:..'e�..............k..d............................................, ....._ !.!."k l✓.:............_llC-.:..........._.......�Z Sy%
yy�� ...............
Onsite Representative:........ PAc'.iu......... k.e.f..'s.p.Ay............»_......................... Integrator:.......... ............................... _.........
,
Certified Operator: .............Qeu.!_.............._...............X o "N..C.�.4�........ r1.A ......... Operator Certification Number:.......................................,
Location of Farm:
Latitude De=`=" Longitude =•� �«
Type of Operation and Desien CHnaeitV
to
Other
Lagoon Area
Spray Field Area j7l>
,k
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
621No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
QNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
[I Yes
//
O'N'o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
011go
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
l'N y/�o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
[I Yes
ff<0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
E2rNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
5No
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97 Continued on back

r�cilityNumber: S � —
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
M'No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
2No
S.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
El Yes
��/O
Structures (I.,a oons and/or Holding Ponds
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
❑ Yes
2W/O
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
........... .....rr.............. .......I.....................I............ .......................... •....... ........... .................. ........ ........................................
............................
...........
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
2_1Vo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
8-No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
ONo
WastApplication � �
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes Q'No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........Ce!.QJ.fp................... ............................•.........•..........•.................•..................................................................•..... ..........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes LU'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes R(No
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes I�No
For Certified Facilities On]
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes O"NNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes M Noo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? El Yes tkl No
Reviewer/InspectorName ;r�jV�lrr.i'�s�j�1`t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:_ �/" -- Date:
ce. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office a
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N
Jonathan B. Hawes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
June 20, 1997
Danny Kornegay
610 Worley Rd.
Princeton, NC 28569 �..
SUBJECT: . Operation Review Summary 0 319
Danny Kornegay Farm Facility No. 51-30�-
Johnson County NA�G��1G
Dear Mr. Kornegay, pE
On June 19, an Operation Review was conducted of Danny Kornegay Farm, facility no. 51-30. This
Review, undert4jWn in accordance with G.S. 143-215.100, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered
livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site
inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information. The following questions and observations were discovered and noted for
response:
1. The lack of sludge storage area is not currently a problem since it was not required as part of a
lagoon at the time this lagoon was designed. George Pettis informed me that Goldsboro routinely
checks the level of sludge in all lagoons and has additives that will reduce the amount of sludge when
it reaches a critical level. Sludge accumulation at or above critical level can affect the management
and performance of a lagoon.
2. This was not required at the time of review but in preparation for the upcoming general permit, you
will need tp secure and maintain the following records on your farm: an Operation and Maintenance
Plan for the waste management system and insect, odor and mortality checklists.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Margaret , Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
ca Johnson Soil and Water Conservation District
George Pettis, Goldsboro Hog Farms
Judy G�arrett,Water"4u'ality Rego aarSSupervisor
Re OSWC glonal Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, C
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NI C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

R QUAL I T`r SECT i ON TO
f PRO P.@2/02
7UL-14-1995 15. 2U
Site Requires Irn mediate Artendnt•-
Facility No. ,5/--30
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: / / - Z `, 1995
Time:
Farm Namc/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: _ .�017n-n,.4
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: .-� Phone-: - 20 /
Physical Address/Location: oin. S/2m-
7
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: " ' Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(app1-oxin1ately l Foot + 7 inches) S' s or No Actual Freeboard: —L-Fr. Inches
Was any seepage observed f om the lagoon(s)? Yes o Was any erasion observed? Yes oK
Is adequate land available for spray?(5s or No Is the cover crop adequate?(n�- or No
Crop(s) being utilized.:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteiial 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
rcthe ariraa] waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Eiue Line Stream? Yes or No
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
TS ar ma] waste discharged into waters of the state by than -made ditch, flushing systein. or other
sim;lar than -made devices? Yes or O If Y--s. Please- Explain.
Zaechc Facility maintain adequate waste managernent Tecords (volumes of manure, land applied -
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cLwer crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
?
I�s�xe�or- N a:ane.
cc: Faciliry Asscssmenz Unit
Signatwe .
-"sr r L�•
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

.rJ_.
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua!

Johnston County FSA
riF Pam' � ' • :..1'"'rj..��`7fr „ - �t �
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Q Restricted Use
77 Umited Restrictions
ion Compliance Pr
Disclaimer: Wetland idenbliers do not represent the size. shape,
or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original
Werminatlon (CPA-028 and atfachtd maps) for exact wedan�
boundaries and determinations. or contact NRCS.
V
Crop SL CRP rW I H
t/ 17.54
8 1 8.031 1 H
6mrs Fiin�
I(
K0 G i U i'►`�G ,
�4 f P
f�_6y+
(3,.L 16,erd
F 'We,+Of 13 P1 fal-la
fW S F 30 �
Total Cropland Acres
63.9

IN
i�

Johnston County FSA
Farm 21210 Tract 2119
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Dlsdalmar: Wettand iderdifiers do not represerd the size, shape.
0 Restricted the
or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original
Acres
Clop E L CR P
Limited Restrktlons
determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact wetland
boundaries and determinations, orwitact MRCS.
_
-
--
Exam from Conservation Cam ion, Provfslons
1 6.05
"2 25.30
3 1.31
�om^l kjaf'I
" 1k
0 400 800 1200 1600 "
�T
for
Cf ��, vu l
Total Cropland Acres
32.7

E**
aai.1101euO P8 u6►a1e�
a�jjn %,

Johnston County FSA
Wetland Determination Identifiers
® Restricted Use
C7 Limited Restrictions
Disclaimer: Wetland identifers do not represent the size, shape.
or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original
determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact wettan�
bounderies and determinations. or contact NRCS.
Acres' Crop 'HEL
F»J
5.45
6.59
2.69
18.22
=3 I.
io
�1 n< -
Total CropfmW Acres
32.9

REGL.IVED
DEC 2 2 2010
NC DENk
Raleigh Regional Office
fE

Wetland Determinationldentifiefs Disclaimer: Welland identifieisdonot representthe size,shape.
® Restricted Use a specif c determination ofthe area. Rotor to your original
cc /�
Johnston Count Fs7A una.d Restrictions �wn+�r (CPA 028 andafached maps) lot exact wedan
Y boundrUsand determinafaMorcontact NRCS.
Acres
Crop
EL
CRP
Ex ham Conservaden ConvIanct Pfarfslons
2
7.31
3
13.38
l
i
� ���,•�f� �ayf� Gync-�
F r
IOtSr
Total Cropland Acres
30.2

REGIVED
DEC 2 2 2010
Raleigh Reg,ona, O iCe
4b

Joan,
I am sending you the revised IRR-2 forms I am in the middle of changing my waste
plan and just haven't finished it yet. The revised forms reflect my current plan.
Also on the crop yield the wheat was 62 bushels soybeans 38 bushels and the corn
snapped 70 bushels due to too much rain this year. Thanks Dan Kornegay
r7,
JA !
NC DENR Raleigh Regional office

FO` AJNED IRRA & WJt-2 Lagoon Liquid l� i,�i rrekls Record
6 Form for Eap, rieid per Crop Cycle
TnMA a T � N 9 Faw. Fadity Number
qsq Sari) y 3
' Farmier omO ►nlp�8on Operabr
i Aftess (� o W or e{ u overasors 7
Owner's Phone. PApne i
NC DENR Rateigh Regional 4 u� Two F'°"'tMx1s Utilization PAN
wktA� r t.oaewV WeCre)= 7S "
7� za
Crop Cyds Tabu Tatra PAN
OW"W*a 6ipnalure Ase3t f.-� OperabPs Slyrrat�ae - -r
CwNed OperaW (AWL_ D AN ko &g64r Operator Certi k*W n 0 � � 'Op0
« Prrsahs oorapleth the "IF-:i0r15 Ra1it tlltita) bsmellythat lraF l An i Were oompleaea ad ts8� every /20 rnihrles_

Fd, .MINED (RR-1 8 M-2 Lagoon Liquid 1.� InI rWW Record
bne Form for Ead. rmid per Crop Cycle r
Trod a ' Fidel S I FaCW NUMW J
RM Siae (watled Sons) e W • (o _.
FSmr Owrw DJWIWY WDIM&Ar -!-ation OpMibrVA 30
Omm%Ad*ess &I& Worn tOk O A :r1w�AIL 2'ii(D9'
O.Oes Phone if Openbh Phone a x' i1i�i
From Yldrsee usitradoa Pisa
G0PTea Ivk(A' �" � laSdtrp )pbraras 5 �G
nl ray m dA f9i rRi m an ®l not nit
Cro{s Cyde Tabb ( i
Omen. slbrAbire - Agletl� 4��
CerObd odor (F *d [1 /1N Rio (.ar
TOM PAN
t �—
Opera w Car on s Yo'O
WsW w Codas C-a , PC-ftOy Cloudy C4CIm* R- mhL 84rrowSkK W-Wb*
P41M oniple" OW * jwnn krapectl 1 - mim k" IAD flonvy eat iespecO ns ware Corsrpktied at Ind every 120 n*%Aes.

Fa ANED IRR-1 & OW-2
it
agoon Liquid 16. u,i rields Reoord
om Form for Each rield per Crop Cyde
Tmd s Tp I l f Fields °Z FadMy NtMrtbar J
Field SILO Sew) m ryq 7• / ••_r
Fwm Owwr DAWIVT WbEACiAr Opewladwr
ow+arleAdse: QA V, woe I t( .O" 7w .2'IIL'r
Ow Ws Ploo S opa mm o Phone! ! 2f - `('7
From t1(asts Uffib2dwl Ptah
Cmv TV"1►rii C.tLoolifft P �(RWW So
(tl m M ml im (8) m dsl Lei not fill
--------------
• ff Drop Cydo Tofafa �j TOW PAN
ownsh 8iprmtuee EG.l�..�+- opsratoh 81prZue -
C lw8d operator (Print) D AN Wo ga— &Ar opwow coons f J- yopC
• Wealiter Codes: C-pear. PC-Pw* Good)►. cr•ciolft R-R@K 64now8leet W-M*
Pusons ooro l m" the irttoabon I - -N Lls must b" to elW ft VW l ; mcdc m were oOre IN m ,' at bait every l2D n*v.* s.

ll)) ( \,
F0► d(NED RR•� 8 -2 tagow L4 h; rields Record
One rM for rietd per Crop Code
TWO .? 119 Field / / 3 FW ft NUffAW � )
Frew Stme tw~ sa.$) a 04 3.7
Faro! OMMt trripelfen Operab
Owner's Aftem G (*j*r(, ICQj hrtpet NI CIPSMADMI
in 7W Addiaes v
w
OwnWs Phone i OPerMMI. Phone t 2f ' 6Y7'
Flom YWsse Uditadan PHn
'up Two
fvLlc.f `Reoar eI al
(1) 0) (3) M (S) P) m (9) (10) n»
mmmmmmm
crop Cyft ToWa - . I Told PAN
SYav / r
Car Mad OpaatoOpaat x CarNiaetton s
• W611O r CoM: C-CIM. PG %ft ter. Cl-�. RAOL &SrnowdSket w-Wk*
" Parsons oo 41011 the Md9aMOn Inwpet�fons mtAt Ill td 10 SIP* 2M impac8ons 11as Co1rtP1e1,1 at MM-eray 120 adraaas.

F AIMED )RR-1 & UM-2
Lag" Liquid 1,
I w rids Record
One Form for Ear ro rield per Clop Cycle
Trad 8 :��1 =t? AW S FacMyNwnbW
Famomm UMNY WDS&ELAr- too C &W
Owneft Adma rp(ojorl fiv" op KSM
A , Cs .3-7
'r,
owraft RM 0 opwskoft POWW a
C49P T%* S
itraoerameadPAN
Loft Mam) =:� -)b 6
(1) Ca Q) m m (8) m (B) (9) (10) (11)
-
--
-----
--
--------------
owneft ftndm
CarMd 0pwWw (PftL—jj��N
opwdw% Sbwk"La
—
opmew caefte&M # I
• Wbm#w Codes C-Chm PC-PwWj Ckk*. C&(Naudy. R-Rah. &&WW)SkK W-whey
Persons An IFINII " * %on kit; m -0 m rn" k" fa signify so I ; i PH m m were r 9 10 1 PI a 11 at IDW every 12D rninufts.

F� .dINED IRR-1 & fink-2 ,Lagoon Liquid `v,,"rlWds Record
One Form for Eaa wield per Crop Cyde
Tmd a .? 11 q RW a �b Fsdlty N~er J F
F N SIM IBC sacs) a py ' • 7
Farm *mW DANIVY WDOM&W (oon Operator
Owrerm Aaf m wog
Ownwe PIM t Opwstofti Phone A
SvMWf 4A %)a I From Waste Utttkow Rm
Oap Type so�4 l ardtrip PAN a�V 7 r
(1) In Im W (a) (81 m M I➢) (101 rill
man
001mun
MEMO
0----
Crap C),afe Tabu t 'I -Lou- i TOM PAN I J
OwaeNs Sipns<ure �"_� Opetabf�s 8lyrgtaa�e
ddW-
casedopwoorowtL D AIJ ko &Ar Operate► Car cedon s
' Weather CON C-CWW PC -POW Cloudy CI-Cb * R-Rain. 85aow1Slset. W &*
" Pwsons oomptelYq file Irrlpadon itapet8ons must bW b akFft VW I�npeceolas were III I I Fl at leaef VM 12D ff*NAes.

Ri .MINED IRR4 & M 2
,1
Teed t
AW Size (mead Moroi)' (N
Farm OOM
Owneft Addrea
OwnWa Phone 6
i.
Lagoon L*id �, uii rieW R mi'd
One Form for Ead i r field per Crop Cyde
Far�dyf J E ��
kwon Op, alp
7
AddNa 1a% .2-j r4l
opewierb pia or 1 jf- 6(-i
,SUhY►if *AAA 1 From W-11 Uli kl*O plan _
n l M cis m aat rai M an 191 nm lilt
Flo
!aim
Mumma
am
====
mmmmmmm
• Crop cyda Tctats I S'r t'°'
cooed ap- it, (P**�iu kLO jkg Ar
Totd PAN � L.✓L
0 ddgr —
OF N Ric cerorkadon s
• W esaw Codes: G•Clear. PC-Pw ►cbUdr• CI.Om dr. R-tah. s4wawlsleet w-Wkw
"Paso a , ON -ri¢ the Ingafbn Irispedlons rrwat kdUN b slpriMy that iapecsoris were aornplefad at bast every 120 nft iea.

FO, JINED tRR-1 81RR-2 Lagoon Liquid in t Helds Record
One Form for Eacr- Meld per Crop Cycie
Tmd f (14 Flews t Fes, S I
Fidel skm t1Il P OCM) m
Farm Owner DAPUT IMMMI.Ar 1peem OF OR Mr
Ow wft Afl*m rpla W o ,e p Adakftdren 'A
O S T o l 64, .% From rlfla>le rite =d" Ptah _
CmPTie Looft )Pµ ?S�
n1 m ell ut rm Un m an fal (Im nit
113
Cmp Cycle Tatars ( TOW PAN �
Owneft sb anea 4i- opwsb t: sanf n Carew Operator Omm) _ DAPKo, 6ar Op"Mm cWWAWon «
• Wtstm codes Cana►, PC lft* cam. CI-C o ar. RO. 84bo dSint W4ft*
" Pfrraans an iplewg the 0 1plon Yrs; l 0 - R nwst M W b sipfly that I spa cdon1 waro tete0 at Mtaet every 12D n*NAW.

UU r ),
FO. .6lNED t'RR•1 & M-2 Lagoon Liquid 6, "1 r*W Record
One Form for Eac?. yield Per Crop Cyde
TnW 0? I l 9 Field r F FWft )minder s I
Field size (weNd own) o W .37 ac rt l
Fans Oft-- DANCT WORMI.Ar Oparal w
OwreA Aften G e Woe .c r, 0" wow
IW
Owners Phone s Oparat % PMna s 1 2f - Q-7
c oix t�.l 6ctwJ #- R0m * a4 UmmId a Plan
G°°Ty°' S-Ai,- "Atf �
r11 in 0) rat 151 l81 m an (9) (10) nu
--------------
• coop Cleb Taw -�9 U00 TOM PAN 3�
Oaneh ®peadure Operator s 8lprstlule z
celaee Operabr tom) D AN Va"W Opes>lior carman s Y�o
• Weadw woes: C-Ow. PGPs* CIm*. Ck3m r. R-Rain. 84nowfS oK w-Vft*
Pennons oor Ob" 19"0t1lg on I W m pop nwst ti" b sipn)b eo #-persons vsene o p ji m 1 1 s) lead every 12011Mmlios.

FQ( ..&INED IRR-18 WR-2 Lagoon Liquid Ik tni rields Record
One Form for Fz& yield per Crop Cycle
Tsa r �.?3�' FWd i / FecWyMimbm
Field Sire (wseled cony e W 10
Fwm O - 119bilEMWOparstaMIME
Ow+eh Address W or a{°A Mbass?w.w .T'l T 6 4
Oww•s Phone. �'•1 opw*W% Phone rr fit- of - 41-7
C oa s'.l I-COW11- From Was w uWaatlon PIm ?3r
Ciep Tps So+6CO, Rsoone+a+ded PAN f—
�ae�p
fil m et m Im (e) m !m (9) clot fill
04.
1!3
Mumma
==mm
mmmmmmm
--------------
Crop Crete TafNs / ? r°0 Tom PAN y(o
Onmefle Siplmene .�"i ODetafa ti >gpse / cerHMd Opaeator (�1_ Q A& ko "r operator Co on 0 ! yAp O
• Wea*W codes: C-DOW. PC.Pwvv Cloudy C4Om*, R-tsh. 84nmmsbK W-Windy
'" Psroals ooeo;Ind r ff» s Ig In I V m -cons nvM WW to slpNy tfat hsp i tona woes oortlSlalom at leml every 120 eednuhs.

), { ` j'
FCk-.dINED IRR-1 & UM-2 Lagoon Liquid L,, 1 a rlekfs Reem-d
One Form for Eaa, riek1 Per Crop Cyde
Tad/� Field• FscRyNumbw J
F w F&D (mod sass) a 9.4 If. A w e r[ I
XF
Farm Cww IrttpsYen Cpuabr
Oww s Aditw fr W orIt A c I
Ownees Phase F aplrsl0fti Phones 1 - Jf -(6 (T
CJaf)c-( 61rb.-a Fear�Mba"onPisa ?i!'
CAP Tie <.o (-4 �IF I 4�oRrooasnftm) =M1
satrp tsl
(1) W 0) Hi 0) 0) Cn 0) (9) (101 (11)
DOME
mw
93
on
ED
mm
�=Mm
--------------
==============
t op Cycle TatW ? `. °`J° Tom PAN �
owhefle If rma"! opasfors Sure
Card Oprstor 1P,lntL () A,N l�o+ L41� opmalm cafTllcm*m r l or Yopo
• Y COM Codes C-Cba. PC -Pelt CkK* C&C3m*. RAWL SSWW)ftK W-INY+dr
" Praoas oa 0,11 D to l %p w m n Ins; -8 9 s wjm M W b slpntt)r tW ' mpectsbs was oomS w 11 st lem every 120 mbufts.

..&INED tRR-1 & OW-2
Tod A
PAM ske (view antis) • A
Fans OW Mt
Owne 's Adebom
Owners Plw •
(i► an
CMP Ty
e31
Lagoon Liquid 1, va rk*b Reoord
One Form br Eft, wield per Crop Cycle
Am m (III
Foc ty J U
h %Pft Opnalor
mgea°n Addram
Operebes Ph" 0
rwsee Uslersdoe Plea Siam—
R.00n.eendeePAN r
Lamov tea) a:
m m 1111 t1e1 n11
13
off m
--------------
• /J CLIP CYde Tabb I Y27 J i TOW PAN
oweleh Swill o Y�O.•�. ' ,�i- opwdW* she I✓L' r—
CoMd over► PWL Q Are b&," ter opwaw caakwon d � � yye
• weSQW codes C.clefr. PCGPeft Cbudy. CM30udy. R-asn. 84bWA Slwt W-Wk*
'• Prnsoss o pl m lb a tw l 1pla ifa; P Am M mM MM b sipnity tint YMpmcftm woe x i l labd aR l" every 120 mUgrEes.

Fa, M))NEDIRR-I&OM-2 Lagoon Liquid rielcts Remd
6ne Form for ii�6, field. per Crop CYdO
Trod S 51 �1? Field SFd? FedFdy Monber
Field Sim Ovesed screQ = W Q. q
PSMOomr �DA 1wr IcDcAc h (vow
ownersAftess role sfidn t
Worl In
, Ifo -.4 - t�,
f!6#%qA-6^ AVI -44w% -AIL .2-7,r6f
owners Phone 6 Oyerslors L.....-Pf-lat - I
P"7
S-vIIftmw 4Aw& t From umkadm Plan Aft
- AM
CMP T�w V 4 a 4w
v4c4 Lzwm—zz9:w)
(3) (4) (5) (a) Cn () (91 Ito r'
Ian
�
��_==��
-
--------
--
CM—P Cpb-Tobk I
IrotId PAN
Ownses sotwum—AW22:: Opmralofs ftn0m_
OF
camd op owti D A 6,4r Opermor camsmon 0
'WeWw Codes: C-Chm. PC4'6* Cloudy. CI Cloudy. R-P4K SSnow/Sket W-Vft*
ft mm mV*e& the ir,gaeon ' ; m ?I, ram kao ft signry that kapecom wero aonlpleoedat MW every 120 ff*pAm.

tasryqu sttii�4atat 't.t a' ; g. ¢ti7 F ' ;,,, -a. y..n, n w-Yy rii i iri 2�,Cii �gitira ts;
' a.,r
ST-nv,tim >$i lnl,k'OWa
t
PRODUCER:
LOCATION:
TELEPHONE:
TYPE OPERATION
Dan Kornegay
610 Worley Rd.
Princeton, NC 27569
(919) 936 MW o A % I
Feeder to finish
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 2880
(Design Capacity)
mp
FJIP�;
v
.IAiy 2 3
NC DENR Raleigh Regional ofnce
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
- the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration. rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

-WASTE UTI'LIZAT N PLAN
.... �.� r R° .,..........,
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft, tons, etc.)
2,880 animals X 1`9 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
2,880 animals X 2`3 lbs. PAN/animal/year =
Guide Std. 633) -
5,472 (tons) waste/year.
6,624 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
*required acreage
Tract Field* Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvpe Per Acre Utilized Application
DanKor
1
L
Bermuda(G)
235
1.051
246.75
March - Sept.
7?_P3b'
2
Ly
Bermuda(G)
235
4.23
994.05
March - Sept.
;a 31K
3
Pn
Bermuda(G
205
4.94
1012.7
March - Sept.
o)-<t
4
UcC
Bermuda G
205
6.21
1273.05
March - Sept.
a) 1
9
NoB
Summer Annual
206
2.39
492.34
May -August
9
NoB
Winter Annual
75
2.39
179.25
Sept. - April
10
NoB
Summer Annual
206
4.26
877.56
May -August
;0\q
10
NoB
Winter Annual
75
4.26
319.5
Sept. - April
NIt
11
NoB
Summer Annual
206
5.56
1145.36
May -August
11
NoB
Winter Annual
75
5.56
417
Sept. - April
12,13
NoB
Bermuda(G)
255
7.88
2009.4
March - Sept.
aa3'K a i
1-4,12,13
NoB
Small Grain
50
24.31
1215.5
March - Sept.
Total
36.52
10,182.46
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
�• •• -• A•.
" See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
36.52
10,182
Table 2
0.00
18,377
Total
36.52
28,560
Amount of N Produced
6,624
Surplus or Deficit
21,936)
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

g,
r. MAST
Y�-� ' 4 N k
„; wi. W(,v ta.. r ;ist
�{,�yEttUTal LIZATiION,IPLAN�
Yt"t',M1:iai�«��i�.Ssftf+Sr?,'1iiW.?ti.11dliiiixirUMirri¢+F:'u,.,wt+ah�zz+k�aa
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type
No.
Crop Application Application
Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
1,2
Ly
Bermuda
0.5
1
3
Pn
Bermuda
0.4
1
4
UcC
Bermuda
0.4
1
5,6,7
GoA
Row Crops
0.4
1
8
BnA/NoA
Row Crops
0.4
1
9,10,11
NoB
Summer/Winter Annuals
0.5
1
12,13
1 NoB
lBermuda
0,5
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation 'see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are effective wetted acre
be used
Page 4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated' soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

AS4�R5 { Ll,�:°?4{tit{141+t �ib�}6��41K6L '.1. S`la�S i9 tik 19t'.. "'l?jtt"d 19 a4 _. :.F n1 :j,�,` {1 6k� (t{�i fff �4 E) 3r �jr1,,1 {q,5e9{�9
��i,{�i,,,}p�d��bry`.WtAST�jE�'UTILIZ'A4:IO.N41PTLAN�ttky{I{t%;1,1Lk;r, 1,r{t9�1,�t,,,
..�. InIg is ��tLS.iRi.iil,w>4i'.L e::�`Etiix.Lta.t. xt.w.. N1b. _aU s1L[d �t�84,ufla,..{�atNn[SLY;}:a�tnA:L.4A�? u�a �iY. �nS'.+h il!{., }W ' {311i; ilSS A. ,.Sii.Kff"At
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for,all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

v
a�WASTE� UTI LIZATI ON P:L`AN
.. ...a, ,.::'.. ..G.. ,.. .'�.i'. ..
Table 10: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
*Optional land
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Twe Per Acre* Utilized Application
DanKorn
5
GoA
Corn
156
3.0
464.88
Feb15-June
aa3Y
5
GoA
Wheat
144
3.0
429.12
Sept. -April
5
GoA
Soybeans
126
3.0
375.48
April - August
5
GoA
Cotton
84
3.0
250.32
April - August
5
GoA
Cover Cro
35
3.0
104.3
Sept. -April
6
GoA
lCorn
156
4.4
691.08
Feb15-June
6
GoA
Wheat
144
4.4
637.92
Se t.-A ril
6
GoA
Soybeans
126
4.4
558.18
April - August
6
GoA
Cotton
84
4.4
372.12
April - August
6
GoA
Cover Cro
35
4.4
155.05
Sept. -April
7
GoA
Corn
156
4.9
758.16
Feb15-June
7
GoA
Wheat
144
4.9
699.84
Sept. -April
7
GoA
Soybeans
126
4.9
612.36
April - August
7
GoA
Cotton
84
4.9
408.24
April - August
7
GoA
Cover Cro
35
4.9
170.1
Sept. -April
8
BnA
Corn
75
4.2
311.25
Feb15-June
8
BnA
Wheat
96
4.2
398.4
Sept. -April
8
BnA
ISoybeans
75
4.2
311.25
April - August
8
BnA
I Cotton
60
4.2
249
ril - August
a 3b'
8
BnA
Cover Cro
35
4.2
145.25
Sept. -April
tl 3°t
CP
BoA
Corn
106
25.0
2650
Febl5-June
1-11
CP
BoA
Wheat
96
25.0
2400
Sept. -April
i1 aa31
I CP
BoA
Soybeans
90
25.0
2250
A ril - August
ill a13l
CP
BoA
Cotton
84
25.0
2100
April - August
'f 11 aa3,1
CP
BoA
Cover Cro
35
25.0
875
Sept. -April
TOTAL 18,377
Page 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Dan Kornegay
Owner/ Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Dan Kornegay
(Please print)
Signature: Date: /U - 27 - o S
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: ( Please print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Private
Address (Agency): 1635 W. Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw, N 8398
Signature:
Date:
� o 4) /CJ D
Page 8

Z�?r
q
v
RECa 1ED
atiWASTE UTILIZAT 2 2 2010
NC DENR
Raleigh Regional Office
Table 10: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
*Optional land
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvne Per Acre* Utilized Application
DanKorn
5
GoA
Corn
156
3.0
464.88
Feb15-June
aa3r
5
GoA
Wheat
144
3.0
429.12
Sept. -April
5
GoA
Soybeans
126
3.0
375.48
April - August
5
GoA
Cotton
84
3.0
250.32
April - August
5
GoA
Cover Crol
35
3.0
104.3
Sept. -April
6
GoA
Corn
156
4.4
691.08
Feb15-June
6
GoA
Wheat
144
4.4
637.92
Sept. -April
6
GoA
Soybeans
126
4.4
558.18
April - August
6
GoA
Cotton
84
4.4
372.12
April - August
6
GoA
Cover Crol
35
4.4
155.05
Sept. -April
7
GoA
Corn
156
4.9
758.16
Feb15-June
7
GoA
Wheat
144
4.9
699.84
Sept. -April
7
GoA
Soybeans
126
4.9
612.36
April - August
7
GoA
Cotton
84
4.9
408.24
April -A gust
7
GoA
Cover Cro
35
4.9
170.1
Sept. -April
8
BnA
Corn
75
4.2
311.25
Feb15-June
8
BnA
Wheat
96
4.2
398.4
Sept. -April
8
BnA
Soybeans
75
4.2
311.25
April - August
8
BnA
Cotton
60
4.2
249
ril - August
a 3a'
8
BnA
Cover Cro
35
4.2
145.25
Sept. -April
fi 3°t
CP
BoA
Corn
106
25.0
2650
Feb15-June
q'11
CP
BoA
Wheat
96
25.0
2400
Sept. -April
1t aa31
CP
BoA
Soybeans
90
25.0
2250
April - August
ill a131
CP
BoA
Cotton
84
25.0
2100
April - August
11 aa39
CP
BoA
Cover Cro
35
25.0
875
Sept. -April
TOTAL 18,377
Page 10

aa�
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft, tons, etc.)
2,880 animals X 1_9 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen AN) Produced Per Year
2,880 animals X 2_3 ;Ibs. PAN/animal/year =
Guide Std. 633) -
Raleigh ge9�o�a��ffic
5,472 (tons) waste/year. e
6,624 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
*required acreage
Tract Field* Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvpe Per Acre Utilized Application
DanKor
1
Ly
Bermuda(G)
235
1.05
246.75
March - Sept.
:?a3k
2
Ly
Bermuda G
235
4.23
994.05
March - Sept.
:Za 3J'
3
Pn
Bermuda(G)
205
4.94
1012.7
March - Sept.
oy, ;
4
UcC
Bermuda G
205
6.21
1273.05
March - Sept.
a� 1
9
NoB
Summer Annual
206
2.39
492.34
May -August
9
NoB
Winter Annual
75
2.39
179.25
Sept. - April
air
10
NoB
Summer Annual
206
4.26
877.56
May -August
\9
10
NoB
Winter Annual
75
4.26
319.5
Se t. - A ril
\9
11
NoB
Summer Annual
206
5.56
1145.36
May -August
11 .
NoB
Winter Annual
75
5.56
417
Sept. - April
a 1
12,13
NoB
Bermuda G
255
7.88
2009.4
March - Sept.
, 1-4112,13
NoB
Small Grain
50
24.31
1215.5
March - Sept.
i Total
36.52
10,182.46
Vrom*This N animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, 0hey must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE.-{ The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

IF � I izR0wPAPs
SO&
PRODUCER
LOCATION:
TELEPHONE:
TYPE OPERATION:
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
(Design Capacity)
Dan Kornegay
610 Worley Rd.
Princeton, NC 27569
(919) 936 MW o a 11
Feeder to finish
2880
o
0
I C w
C=
-1
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it -is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare -ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft, tons, etc.)
2,880 animals X 1_9 (tons) waste/animal/year = 5,472 (tons) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
2,880 animals X 2_3 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 6,624 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Guide Std. 633) - Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
*required acreage
Tract Field* Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. TVDe Per Acre Utilized Aoolication
DanKor
1
Ly
Bermuda G
235
1.051
246.75
March - Sept.
2
Ly
Bermuda G
235
4.23
994.05
March - Sept.
3
Pn
Bermuda G
205
4.94
1012.7
March - Sept.
4
UcC
Bermuda G
205
6.21
1273.05
March - Sept.
9
NoB
Summer Annual
206
2.39
492.34
May -August
9
NoB
Winter Annual
75
2.39
179.25
Sept.-. A ril
10
NoB
Summer Annual
206
4.26
877.56
May -August
10
NoB
Winter Annual
75
4.26
319.5
Sept. - April
11
NoB
Summer Annual
206
5.56
1145.36
May -August
11
NoB
Winter Annual
75
5.56
417
Sept. - A ril
12,13
NoB
Bermuda G
255
7.88
2009.4
March - Sept.
1-4,12,13
NoB
Small Grain
50
24.31
1215.5
March - Sept.
Total
36.52
10,182.46
•
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE. The applicator is cautioned that P. and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

i:'� a�,� t �• �`1ful,.:};t+u�e:t4.#i{yn 2� ,tu:+,eeu uELuu;Sr"k. u.uua `w .?�' ,s i'A
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
0 - See footnote for Table 1.
•
ype Per Acre* Itilized
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
36.52
10,182
Table 2
0.00
18,377
Total
36.52
28,560
Amount of N Produced
6,624
Surplus or Deficit
21,936
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

ac trt n i. as �w+rm t.aaaN ar bt m r e q':m u - ti r mr
4.�.. {�t4Y1�� � '1 a� � t Z!a aiad h, n+x"huava�.U1n. n.��a�uJtra:fuiuiutuu,mo,c4w��,�uk�.u?ma'ic.� uTi�t�i'u t1� S� c �'G�3' elm nti� 'r.(�a,� 3 �t.. Ili{131�i,t w 1.0
•
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Field Soil Type
No.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Crop Application Application
Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
1,2
Ly
Bermuda
0.5
1
3
Pn
Bermuda
0.4
1
4
UcC
Bermuda
0.4
1
5,6,7
GoA
Row Crops
0.4
1
8
BnA/NoA
Row Crops
0.4
1
9,10,11
NoB
I Summer/Winter Annuals
0.5
1
12,13
Nob I
Bermuda
0.5
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are effective wetted acreage. All land shown in Table 1 is required for the balancing
of this plan. All land listed on Table 10 is optional for use. Any of the crops or fields listed may
be used, although none is required.
Page 4

Y Y{' tgw' 'b�1W�elj +'"{tf�t'Y3it'C h1tYKf4V7t I i RY 1 t B N� pt
{ ��;g� '� 33 � �'p8��IIV����ITE UT{IL �.r�� �T� �j��{L�►�l�`1��'.. �i{ it � Isl7� • ,
�' k. I d�„.1i� i . is U ntfettt�rwe�lnu�i.i.It�ev�tiwdY �x:ur:�ilu�uwlw:eau{aYawf}�i� I ��°rlularl�u °' ;ib'� ,I �....,::f � k ue�i�? ,?ns' �ia
AREQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity; allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

•
s i�, r�s�rrr,�sat� � STD .rtm _xmroe wa ���zrnt� ttrt� �$ � x
�{Vl t/�� E .'' TI: r�IZ,q, . �� ,�, N P;t : im, " , ..' , ,
41{ xus3 ua mr a, -auoo k Ixwtt a3 %w Jl xed e S t u
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a'swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

,_9
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures 'should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for,all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
•
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations
Page 7

�,,�t���(;;�k ��r �������( &�pit°AAWA's��3�����z��;�°������►N:� �� � � � �i . � 6� �,t„i, s` ,d.,tbtf`9�,.im,i.�c 4,5, Yut i °al hot j i+, kFf. `JtE,dW1 t�x:budi�u+(ir.ura aui urau n�irna� a u .r+ti wvsa �x n � a�R� i i
�,,,.• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Dan Kornegay
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Dan Kornegay
(Please print)
Signature: Date: /y
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Private
Address (Agency): 1635 W. Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw, N9728398
Signature: xj Date:
Page 8

"s
1
Table 10: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
*Optional land
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N
# No. Type
Per Acre* Utilized
Month of
Application
DanKorn
5
GoA
Corn
156
3.0
464.88
Feb15-June
5
GoA
Wheat
144
3.0
429.12
Sept. -April
5
GoA
Soybeans
126
3.0
375.48
April - August
5
GoA
Cotton
84
3.0
250.32
April - August
5
GoA
Cover Cro
35
3.0
104.3
Sept. -April
6
GoA
Corn
156
4.4
691.08
Feb15-June
6
GoA
Wheat
144
4.4
637.92
Sept. -April
6
GoA
Soybeans
126
4.4
558.18
April - August
6
GoA
Cotton
84
4.4
372.12
April - August
6
GoA
Cover Crol
35
4.4
155.05
Sept. -April
7
GoA
Corn
156
4.9
758.16
Feb15-June
7
GoA
Wheat
144
4.9
699.84
Sept. -April
7
GoA
Soybeans
126
4.9
612.36
April -August
7
GoA
Cotton
84
4.9
408.24
April - August
7
GoA
Cover Crol
35
4.9
170.1
Sept. -April
8
BnA
Corn
75
4.2
311.25
Feb15-June
8
BnA
Wheat
96
4.2
398.4
Sept. -April
8
BnA
Soybeans
75
4.2
311.25
April - August
8
BnA
Cotton
60
4.2
249
April - August
8
BnA
Cover Cro
35
4.2
145.25
Sept. -April
CP
BoA
Corn
106
25.0
2650
Feb15-June
CP
BoA
Wheat
96
25.0
2400
Sept. -April
CP
BoA
Soybeans
90
25.0
2250
April - August
CP
BoA
Cotton
84
25.0
2100
April -August
CP
BoA
Cover Cro
35
25.0
875
Sept. -April
TOTAL
18,377
Page 10

} 1
l Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Dan Kornegay Farm
Address: 610 Worley Rd.
Princeton, NC 27569
Telephone: (919) 936 o a i I
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Field of Field
Number (acres)
Soil Tvoe Slooe % CroD(s)
County: Johnston
Date: 10/26/2005
Maximum
Maximum
Application
Application
per Irrigation
Rate
Cycle
(In/hr)
(inches) Comments
1
1.05
Ly
<5
Bermuda
0.5
1
2
4.23
Ly
<5
Bermuda
0.5
1
3
4.94
Pn
<5
Bermuda
0.4
1
4
6.21
UCC
<5
Bermuda
0.4
1
5
2.98
GoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
1
*change of arc required
$
4.43
GoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
1
7
4.86
GoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
1
8
4.15
BnA/NoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
1
9
2.39
NoB
<5
Summer/Winter Annual
0.5
1
10
4.26
NoB
<5
Summer/Winter Annual
0.5
1
11
5.56
NoB
<5
Summer/Winter Annual
0.5
1
12
4.14
NoB
<5
Bermuda
0.5
1
13
3.74
NoB
<5
Bermuda
0.5
1
0 0 0

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Cadman 3750 Reel
Travel Application TRAVEL LANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
Hvdrant No. (ft/min) (in/hr.) Width(ft.) Lenoth(ft) (feet) (Inches) at Gun(DSi) at reel(Dsi) Pattern Comments - Acres Der Dull
1
2.42
0.35
280
0
280
0.97
70
100
330
1.05
2
2.42
0.35
240
558
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.23
3
2.42
0.35
240
686
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.94
4
2.42
0.35
280
802
280
0.97
70
100
330
6.21
5
2.9
0.48
135
759
280
0.97
70
100
220
2.98
6.
2.42
0.35
200
741
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.43
7
2.42
0.35
240
672
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.86
8
2.42
0.35
280
522
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.15
9
2.42
0.35
240
223
280
0.97
70
100
330
2.39
10
2.42
0.35
200
704
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.26
11
2.42
0.35
240
799
280
0.97
70
100
330
5.56
12
2.42
0.35
209.2
701
280
0.97
70
100
330
4.14
13
2.42
0.35
209.2
618
280
0.97
70
100
330
3.74
52.94

Sheet4
ITABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Solid Set
Irrigation Gun
Irri ation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler m
150.7
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
99.3
Design Precipitation Rate in/hr
0.29
Hose Length feet
1100
xxxxxxXX
Type of Speed Compensation
Mechanical
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type PTO, Engine, Electric
Engine
Pump Power Requirement h
19.4
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION
AREA (sq. ft.
90 degree bend
4.94
Dead End
3.5
Tee
2.45
Gate Valve
3.5
45 degree bend
2.66
Page 1

0
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: Kraig Westerbeek
Company: Private
Address: 1635 W. Wards Bridge Rd. Warsaw, NC 28398
Phone: [phone]
Required Documentation
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
W
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, pipelines, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for IRRIGATION WATER CONVEYANCE.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and
address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip of 25' or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all
perennial streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.

Sheet6
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
This system is designed around the use of a Cadman 3750 irrigation reel with 1100' of PE hose and
a .97" ring nozzle operated at 70psi for all pulls. New underground piping will need to be installed
for pulls 9-13 as aluminum piping is used today. Acres shown represent wetted acres on pulls
1-7 and 9-11 as these fields are existing in current or past NUP's for this facility. Acres for pulls 8, 12,
and 13 are 'effective' wetted acreage. For new fields, SB 515 setbacks have been shown on the
working map. For existing fields, a 100' setback and 200' residential setback must be maintained.
Producer is familiar with the operation and maintenance requirements of this system. If there
are questions, please refer to owner's manuals, irrigation dealer, or designer.

•
•
•
Sprinkler Specifications
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 150
Nozzle Size:
0.96 inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
70 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
150.7 gpm
Wetted Diameter:
280 feet
Lane Spacinas
Sheet7
CALCULATIONS
*based on calibration done
7/29/2005
Desired Spacing (%):
70 %
Design Spacing(feet):
196 *PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet):
200 feet
Actual Spacing (%):
71 %
Application Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)/(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Design App. Rate =
0.29 in/hr
300 degree arc =
0.35 in/hr
220 degree arc =
0.48 in/hr
180 degree arc =
0.58 in/hr
Traveller Speed
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
0.5 inches
300 degree arc =
2.42 ft/min
220 degree arc =
2.90 ft/min
180 degree arc =
4.84 ft/min
Mainline Velocity
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate / pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
**For buried pipelines, velocity
should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size:
6 inches
Velocity=
1.71 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sheet7
Maximum Mainline Friction Loss
• Most distant hydrant: 13
Total distance: 1780 feet
Friction Loss is figured using Hazen/William's Equation
Friction Loss= 0.17 feet/100 feet
Max. Mainline Loss = 3.0 feet or 1.3 psi
Total Dvnamic Head
Sprinkler Pressure:
70 psi
Loss through traveller:
30 psi
Elevation head:
1.1 psi
Mainline loss:
1.3 psi
Suction head and lift:
2.2 psi
5% fitting loss:
5.2 psi
TOTAL(TDH) =
109.8 psi or
Horsepower Required
Horsepower = Flowrate x TDH(feet) / 3960 / Pump effeciency
Pump Description: Cornell 3HA
Pump Efficiency: 45 %
Horsepower Required: 21.5 Hp
Thrust Blocking
Thrust Block Area = Thrust / Soil Bearing Strength
Thrust:
4200 feet
Soil Bearing Strength:
1200 feet
End Cap:
3.5 ft2
90 degree elbow:
4.9 ft2
Tee:
2.5 ft2
45 degree elbow:
2.7 ft2
Pioe Pressure Rating Check
253.8 feet
Pressure Rating of Pipe to be Used: 200 psi
Max. Pressure on system when running: 109.8 psi
70% of Pressure Rating: 140 psi
If Max. Pressure on system is less than 70% of Pressure Rating, OK
�0 Net Positive Suction Head Check
Page 2

Sheet7
NPSHA: 21.4
NPSHR: 5 *from pump curve
If NPSHA>NPSHR OK
•
Page 3

•
•
Acreage calculations
Pull No.
Width
Length Start
Stoo
Total Acres
1
280
0
0.57
0.48
1.05
2
240
558
0.64
0.52
4.23
3
240
686
0.64
0.52
4.94
4
280
802
0.57
0.48
6.21
5
135
759
0.37
0.26
2.98
6
200
741
0.57
0.46
4.43
7
240
672
0.64
0.52
4.86
8
280
522
0.43
0.36
4.15
9
240
223
0.64
0.52
2.39
10
200
704
0.57
0.46
4.26
11
240
799
0.64
0.52
5.56
12
209.2
701
0.42
0.35
4.14
13
209.2
618
0.42
0.35
3.74
52.94

01
•5�;�-'Twr _
�i•
Ai
it _

_
4•. _
y
Si
a t
gg
At
s�
4

WASTE UTILIZATION'PLAN
Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc.
Thursday, April 15, 1999
Producer: Danny Kornegay
Farm Name: Danny Kornegay Farm
610 Worley Road
Princeton,NC 27569
Telephone # : [phone]
Type of Operation : Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals : 2880 hogs design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when. it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the. waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application througq jrrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 9

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, 0, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE N/ACRE N/ACRE USED TIME
2238
1A
DOGUE 0-2%
WA
1
1 1001
0
6.75
675
SEP-APR
2238
1B
DOGUE 0-2%
WA
11
100
0
6.75
675
SEP-APR
2237
1C
BONNEAU 0-6%
BC
4.7
235
01
5.46
1283.1
MAR-SEP
2237
1C
BONNEAU 0-6%
SG
1.5
75
0
5.46
409.5
SEP-MAR
2237
1 D
BONNEAU 0-6%
BC
4.7
235
0
2.68
629.8
MAR-SEP
2237
- 1D
BONNEAU 0-6%
SG
1.5
75
0
2.68
201
SEP-MAR
2119
2A
UCHEE 0-6%
BH
4.8
240
0
4.1
984
MAR-SEP
2119
2A
UCHEE 0-6%
SG
1
50
0
4.1
205
SEP-APR
2119
2B
UCHEE 0-6%
BH
4.8
240
0
4.82
1156.8
MAR-SEP
2119
2B
LICHEE 0-6%
SG
1
50
0
4.82
241
SEP-MAR
2238
3A
UCHEE 0-6%
1 BC
4.11
205
0
4.18
856.9
MAR-SEP
2238
- 3A
UCHEE 0-6%
r SG
1.5
75
0
4.18
313.5
SEP-MAR
2238
3B
IPANTEGO DRAINED
BC
4.1
205
0
2.85
584.25
MAR-SEP
2238
3B
PANTEGO DRAINED
SG
1.5
75
0
2.85
213.75
SEP-MAR
2238
3C
UCHEE 0-6%
BC
4.1
205
0
5.62
1152.1
MAR-SEP
2238
3C
UCHEE 0-6%
SG
1.5
75
0
5.62
421.5
SEP-MAR
2238
4A
BONNEAU 0-6%
BC
4.7
235
0
5.27
1238.45
MAR-SEP
2238
- 4A
BONNEAU 0-6%
SG
1.5
75
0
5.27
395.25
SEP-MAR
2238
4B
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
2.57
706.75
MAR-SEP
2238
4B
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
1.5
75
0
2.57
192.75
SEP-MAR
2238
5A
PANTEGO DRAINED
C
135
148.75
20
3.86
574.175
MAR-JUN
2238
* 5A
PANTEGO DRAINED
W
50
120
0
3.86
463.2
SEP-APR
2238
5A
PANTEGO DRAINED
SB
50
200
3.86
772
APR-SEP 15
2239
- 6A
BONNEAU 0-6%
WA
1
100
0
5.59
559j
SEP-APR
2239
- 6B
BONNEAU 0-6%
WA
1
100
0
5.06
506
SEP-APR
971
6C
BONNEAU 0-6%
WA
1
100
0
4.58
458
SEP-APR
971
- 6D
BONNEAU 0-6%
WA
1
100
0
4.92
492
SEP-APR
TOTALS: 15455.1
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONGTERM LEASE'
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased'
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS N/UNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
SB
ISOYBEANS
BUSHELS
1 4
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
AC
100
U
Page 3 of 9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 '
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 75.061 15,455 •
TOTALS: 1 76.061 15,455
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 6,624
"'BALANCE -8,831
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application. of nutrients or other elements...Your production facility
will produce approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.56 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the reconl#nended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (inlhr) AMT (inches)
2119
-2A, -2B
UCHEE 0-6%
SG
0.00
"1
2119
2A, 2B
UCHEE 0-6%
BH
0.00
*1
2237
IC, ID
BONNEAU 0-6%
BC
0.00
*1
2237
-IC,-ID
BONNEAU 0-6%
SG
0.00
'1
2238
-413
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
0.50
'1
2238
4A
BONNEAU 0-6%
BC
0.00
'1
2238
-4A
BONNEAU 0-6%
SG
0.00
'1
2238
4B
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
'1
2238
3B
PANTEGO DRAINED
BC
0.45
*1
2238
'5A
PANTEGO DRAINED
C
0.45
*1
2238
'5A
PANTEGO DRAINED
SB
0.45
'1
2238
-3B
PANTEGO DRAINED
SG
0.45
*1
2238
'5A
PANTEGO DRAINED
W
0.45
'1
Page 4of9

2238
3k 3C
UCHEE 0-6%
BC
0.00
'1
2238
-3A,-3C
UCHEE 0-6%
SG
0.00
'1
2238
-1A,-1B
DOGUE 0-2%
WA
0.35
'1 j
2239
-6A,--6B
BONNEAU 0-6%
WA
0.00
'1
971
-6C,-6D
JBONNEAU 0-6%
WA
0.00
- '1
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen, limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
r�
Page 5 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION'
This WUP has been revised to reflect wettable acres with the map and WUP acres by
irrigation pulls. The most current FSA map was utilized (to scale: 1"=660'). The small grain
overseed will be removed by April 7 by grazing. No animal waste may be applied to the
grazed bed da after'August 31 and &%small grain PAN will be applied in split applications;
Sept. 15 S`� toter 30 and in FebruarMarch.
20 Ibs of N has been deducted from the corn crop that will follow soybeans for residual
nitrogen.
Page 6 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for.every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change -in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
.� should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
"7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method whico does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from anv residential propertv boundary
Page 7 of 9

and from any perennial stream .or, river•(other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than.100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellin9s other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system..
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no othev applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible.markers shall be installed to mark the top and ,bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for
five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 8 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
U
--1
Page 9 of 9

NAME OF FARM: Danny Kornegay Farm
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and'the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
�-' named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACI OWNER: Danny Kornegay
SIGNATURE DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner): DAeg I�o�wl+�AY
please print
SIGNATURE:_ •"�1/ �� DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: George H. Pettus
AFFILIATION: Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc.
ADDRESS (AGENCY): PO Box 10009
Goldsboro, NC 27532
(919); 77788-3130
SIGNATURE: DATE: K R► L- q
Page 10 of 9

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 23, 1998
Danny Kornegay
Danny Kornegay Farm
610 Worley Rd
Princeton NC 27569
1 ,Tk?W,A •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510030
Danny Kornegay Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Danny Kornegay:
In accordance with your application received on August 20, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Danny Kornegay, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Danny Kornegay Farm, .located in Johnston
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 2880 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510030
Danny Kornegay Farm
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
wncerei ,
_ALA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU
George Pettus

O'� W A jF9 Michael F. Easley, Govemor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
~ Division of Water Quality
p �c
April 9, 2003
Danny Komegay
Danny Komegay Farm
610 Worley Road
Princeton NC 27569
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA251030
Danny Kornegay Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Danny Kornegay:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on January 16, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Danny Komegay, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection,, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS510030 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Danny Komegay Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 2880 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions!"and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow 'or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this Dermit. The Devices to Automatically StoD Irrieation Events Form
must be returned .to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
LVKr
RME R
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

I
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
C' it 1 IF
E
LAIR 2003 ►,
DEN
R RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA251030
Permit File AWS510030
NDPU Files

Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool Completion
Name of Facility: ()A NNY i t fyAO' Ao L AW Facility Number: 1_1 - 3U
Owner(s) Name: 041=iV I' eng vl; b-4I' Phone No: 9 l q - YA - 0�1 11
Mailing Address: qX7 �1 CC- I,,- PR= ���T�v NC, �'] S-G `t
Check the appropriate box below, and sign at the bottom:
K No fields received a high or very high rating.
❑ Yes, the fields listed below received a high or very high rating:
ICJ•
Please use as many additional attachment forms (PLAT-A-10-31-03) as needed for additional fields.
By completing the above section and any additional attachments and by signing this form, the facility
owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge all application fields were evaluated using the Phosphorus
Loss Assessment Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct the Assessment. A copy will
be kept on site with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be
approved by a technical specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. Waste plans with fields having a high or very high rating will have to be modified to
address phosphorus loss by the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007.
Owner Name: ()A,v.Zi L ! eA A►1: LXN Ier,:KNr k4r
Owner Signature: !,/-44J 44 =/ Date:
Technical Specialist Name:
Technical Specialist
Affiliation:
PLAT-12-11-03
Phone No: Qt9 434 .17t6t g,(�3
Submit this form to:
Attn: Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

OFWATF
� r
Danny Kornegay
Danny Kornegay Farm
610 Worley Rd
Princeton, NC 27569
Dear Danny Kornegay:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H.-Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality.
ti—
July 1, 2007!'-'�
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510030
Danny Kornegay Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
In accordance with your application received on 20-Feb-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Danny Kornegay, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Danny Kornegay Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 2880 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition III.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity .with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatgAuality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
None Carolina
Naturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name. change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS510030

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number - Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: 6,r,>,A,J Kocr4 r, rwL acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative:toJ_Part ll eligibility item(s) F1 �_ F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:.T tj J 41"
Date of site visit: 3 f 3
Date of most recent WUP: 3 .Z S
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: 'Z i Z Z_ pounds
Irrigation System(s) - cir e : 1. rd-hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I_ or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
�/F 2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

DRAFT ; /
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number 5/ - 3-0
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
zz,;`6
Z
u..
1�.2
q
•
2 1 . Z-$
� C7
Z.z3-7
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

FACILITY NUMBER
FARM NAME:
REVIEWER:
DATE:
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN
POND-
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation:
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume,
Temporary storage volume.
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design .
Design
Design
Design
ft3
ft3
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:.
--46—ft. 1 st 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. 2"d 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard in.
z$ ft.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

CEO-; r. 113(01.
3/zS-b7
Y B7V4
C.soLVJ'

0F W IVI0.N IdCl r. r-da�cy, %JUVCll lul
TFi9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`OCR QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 24, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Danny Komegay Farm
601 Worley Road
Princeton, N.C. 27569
Subject: Notice of Violation
Danny Komegay Farm
Facility 51-30
Permit No. AWS510030
Dear Mr. Korngay:
On March 11, 2003, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of
the subject facility. Although it has been a particularly challenging year weather-wise there were no
physical problems observed with the facility. However, there were waste application events recorded in
November for which a corresponding waste sample report was not available. Waste samples are
required within sixty (60) days of a waste application event. Samples were collected in August and the
following March, but these were not within the required sixty day period.
Please address this issue to ensure the proper utilization of the subject animal waste. If you should have
any questions or desire further information please contact John Hunt at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely;
,eLe�.
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Farms
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone]
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone]
Customer Service
1-800-623-7748
.WomJ►
NCO

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Danny Kornegay
Danny Kornegay Farm
610 Worley Road
Princeton NC 27569
Dear Danny Kornegay:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
fJ
t,. %tiff i
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number --5.1_3-0�
Johnston C—onnty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 10, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNC T REQUESTED
Danny Komegay
Danny Komegay Farm
610 Worley Rd
Princeton NC 27569
Farm Number: 51 - 30
Dear Danny Komegay:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Danny Komegay Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of1his letter, your
farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
I
Sincerely,
�A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

S1.1a
Im
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division .of ,Watdr.Quality .
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Daniel F. Kornegay
610 Worley Road
Princeton NC 27569
Dear Mr. Komegay :
IT
LT.WYWA
1D E H N F=?k
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Feb 04 2008 2:53PM KORNEGAY FARMS 9199363213 P..1_._____
KORNEGAY FARMS
A Family Tradition
610 Worley Road • Princeton, NC 2 75 69
919-936-0211 • Fax [phone]
FAX
TO: 6mv.,
FROM: fLA4:
FAX: 97 t f
PAGES: S
PHONE:
DATE:
RE:
CC:
❑
URGENT
❑ FOR REVIEW
❑
❑
PLEASE CONFIRM
PLEASE COMMENT
❑ PLEASE RECYCLE
COMMENTS:

Feb 04 2008 2:53PM KORNEGAY FARMS
9199363213 P.2
P�
7447 Jobe Road
fir, Gdy. NG Z78=
•--- C2�2> 88�-4�90
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Farm Name and DWO Identiffmdon Number. Daniel Warnegay DWQ # 81-W
Lagoou Idem+tiScation: Lagoon # I
Measurements Taken By: Chad Pridgen
Date of Sludge Survey: 09/29/08
Methods/Devioes Used for Measurement of. .
a. Distaave from the lagoon iigaid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
Plaatic mound disc conseCted to an akwWW..I ft2
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid smiaae to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon:
1 inch PVC pipe with end cap
a. Thickness of the sludge layer if analming a direot nmeasarutttisaU with «cozy sanvier" :
Nis
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 1.57 acres
Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Mess than 1.83 sores: Use 8 points
-' b. If more than 1.33 acres: 1.87 acres z @= 10 , with maximum of 24.
At the time of the sludge survey. also measure the distance h=n the Mazi n im Liquid Level to the
Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): SIR (tenths)
Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum liquid Level 2.4 Ft (tenths)
(Deterudne from Plan or other lagoon m=ds)
Distance hwn the present liquid surface level to the hUnimnumn Liquid Level 0.4 Ft (tenths)
Record from. the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
lagoon bottom (average for all the m wmwement points): 9.49 n (tenths)
Record from Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid sudiace level to the
top of the sludge layer (average for all dw rdeasureament points): B.SY Ft (tenths)
Record from Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 2.t18 Fi (tenths)
Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatmuent Zone: ti. l T Ft (tenths)
* Note. If the eakmlated thiclrness of the existing Liquid Tmimebt Zone is less than 4 feet, a
sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N.C. DWO. See your specific permit or
contact DWO for more information.
Completed By: Chad Pridgen Printed Nature
Signature
09/29/06 Date

Feb 04 2008 2:53PM KORNEGAY FARMS 9199363213 P•3
7447 Job- Pow(
,ff1,7 Grfy,-NG 27822
(2�2) 882 4690
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Name and DWQ Identification Number. Daniel 8oraegay DWQ # S 1-30
Lagoon Identification: Lagoon # 1
Measurements Taken By: Chad Pridgen
Date of Sludge Survey: 09/29/06
Grid Po'
Number
Distance from liquid
surface to top of sludge
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom soil
Thidbwas of sludge
la
Feet ftgths
Feet Ltlaft
Feet
1
6.8
9.8
3
2
6
9.4
3.4
3
0.4
9.8
3.1
4
6.7
9.6
2.8
8
6.7
9.6
2.8
6
7
9.8
2.5
7
6.8
9.3
2.7
8
7
9.5
2.8
9
8
9.5
3.8
10
6.6
9.8
2.9
11
12
13
14
18
18
17
18
19
.20
21
22
23
24
JL;;
6.8? P4 f
9.49 rt(tenths) 2.92 Pt the

Feb 04 2008 2:54PM KORNEGRY FARMS 9199363213 p.4
Pia
7447 Jobe JPoad
Ply Gily, NG 27622
(2f52) 885-4690
Sludge Survey Volume Worksheet
Farm Name and DWO Iderditication Number:
Lagoon Identii3cation:
Measurements Taken By:
Date of Sludge Survey:
Average Sludge Layer Thickness
Daniel SosnegaY DWO # 31-30
Lagoon # 1
Chad Pridgeri
09/29/00
Depth of lagoon from top of bank to bottom soil surface
Slope = horizomaUbmtical side slope
Length at top inside'bank
Width at top inside bank
Length at midpoint of sludge layer
Width at midpoint of sludge layer
Volume of sludge
Volume in gallons
2.92
13.00
3
325.00
210.00
235.76
140.76
103,322
788,417

Ln
Q
cm
Cu
m
W
cm
m
a)
07
U)
E
m
C
LL
CC
C9
W
L
O
X
FOW CROP-1
CROP YIELD RECORD
Farm omw DANNY o�✓� ti
operao K� A
Facility Number S" -?,)
Date
mm/d
Field/Pull ID
Crop
Yield
Bales or Bushels
Bale Size
dapplicable)
FleidiPull Site
wetted acres
'Yldd per Acre
Dole or BwWk
i
it
It ' (3) Yield/Acre = (1) YI divided by (2) Fleld/Pu Size. (3)=(1 U(2) � 311403
C.
L

�!� r`j' i� � � M. 'i 1M �n� Lj r ?``u }F'�,`R"�J7•+ a,. �" y'f � 1L • /, ��
rj t
State of North Carolina ,5
Department of Environment and Natural Resources O Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form f�� 1, 2 0 `'93
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
w- General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations-
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FacilityName: Danny Kornegay Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Danny Kornegay
1.3 Mailing address: 610 Worley Rd
City, State: Princeton NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 936-1201
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
Zip: 27569
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 2529, 1.6 miles northwest of SR 1007. Faun on
northside of SR2529.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): 1) At Al 4p, N A`(
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Goldsboro Hog Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/93
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _51_ (county number); 30 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
FeecTer to Finish
2880- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Beef
Farrow to Wean (# sow) Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 51- 30

r
'
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 58.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 37.7
2.4 Number o lagoon storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
P!ease indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the. space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and ;
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations. - K.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen bestmanagement practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 2 of 4 51- 30

Facility Number: 51 - 30 ►t� 2 0 It)1U
Facility Name: Danny Kornegay Farm
4. PPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this appliedlion for AA)A)Y AVoRA-,1e4 64A/1 (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me arid is accurate a d complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will turned to me a incomplete.
Signature Date 1
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, 0/) 6> R NFG 4 Y (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for OANNY ec,ArvA4y rAp,M (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returne4 as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
N
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51 - 30

"I
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
l
1
Producer: DANNY RORNEGAY
Location: 610 WORLEY RD.
PRINCETON NC 27569
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2880.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
to tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
2238
2
UCB
BP
3.6
180
0
4
720
I
APR-SEP
2238
3
BP
3.4
0
jTn
I
1170
15.18
1880.6
APR-SEP
2238
4
BP
3.6
0
jPn
1180
113.8512493
APR-SEP
2238
1
BP
4.1
0
5
jWaB
I
I
1205
11025
APR-SEP
t7
1
BP
3.6
180
0
jUcB
I
`�
19.68
11742.4
APR-SEP
2238
SG
1
50
0
4
1-2 jUcB
I
1200
SEP-MAY
2238
SG
1
0
1-3 jTn
I
150
15.18
1259
SEP-MAY
2238
SG
1
0
1-4 jPn
I
150
113.851692.5
SEP-MAY
2238
--1
SG
1
50
0
5
250
lWaB
I
SEP-MAY
2237
SG
1
0
1-1 jUcB
I;
150
19.68
1484
SEP-MAY
END
I
TOTALI8746.5
--
- Indicates that
this field is being
overseeded
(i.e.
interplanted)
or winter annuals
follow
summer annuals.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
,NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
i
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTALI0
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is /planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BP
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
37.71
8746.5
0
0
37.71
8746.5
* BALANCE
-2122.5
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
i
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land.
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5328
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 17.76 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 42.624 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed.the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
Field
Soil Type
crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
2237 I
1
UcB
BP
.5
*1
2237
-1
UcB
SG
.50
*1
2238
1
WaB
I BP
.5
*1
2238
2
UcB
BP
.5
*1
2238 13
Tn
I BP
I .35
I *1
2238
4
Pn
BP
.35
*1
2238
-1
WaB
I SG
.50
*1
2238
--2
UcB
SG
.503
*1
2238
-3
Tn
SG
.35
*1
() s8
--4
Pn
SG
.35
*1
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but.less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property,
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system./
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept ,on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3.)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

MUl7 10 76 YJ7. 1JM1'1 J Vr11 `IJ 1 VI'I �.V • �.VVr Ln
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r.a,a
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGRXEMXNT
Name of Farm:DANNY KORNEGAY
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: DANNY KORNEGAY
(Please print)
Signature: 2Date: _3--ZS--%
Name of Manager (If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Jerry Raynor
A#filiation:Johnston SWCD Phone No. 919-969-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
G/ GGG
Signature: ./'?a4o��O� Date:
Page: 13

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Swine production Vegetative or wooded buffers;
0 Recommended best management practices;
® Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces • Dirty manure -covered animals JR Dry floors
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors ® Slotted floors;
A Watcrers located over slotted floors;
O Feeders at high end of solid floors;
O Scrape manure buildup from floors;
O Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; O Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition or scrape;
O Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; ® Fan maintenance;
Dust M Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces Dust JR Washdown between groups of animals;
® Feed additives;
O Feeder covers;
8 Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
oa+e*s
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
O
Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
O
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
• Agitation during wastewater
O
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
JO
Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
O
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance

•\ I
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewater
19
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emissions;
0
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing;
1$
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation
a
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
IN
Minimum agitation when.pumping;
O
Mechanical aeration;
O
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
• High pressure agitation;
14
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles
o Wind drift
9
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
IN Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
O Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
O
Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface
.
Mixing while filling;
O
Tank covers;
•
Agitation when emptying
O
Basin surface mats of solids;
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
O
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
O
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
•
Agitation when spreading;
O
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
.
Volatile gas emissions
O
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
•
Volatile gas emissions while
O
Soil injection of slung/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
O
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
surfaces
O
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
•
Carcass decomposition
1$
Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal
•
Carcass decomposition
O
Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
Pits
O
Proper location/construction of disposal pits
lncincrators
0
Incomplete combustion
0
Secondary stack bumers

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; IN Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Of Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information :
Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 RuleBMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
. NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
A MOC - Nn'vember 11, 19969 Page S

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids 0 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation It Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • : Feed Spillage O Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
CR Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 -10
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Storage • Accumulations of feed residues O Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewers grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
trr _ NnVI TF1Pr 11, 1996; Per 1
i .

Source Cause
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes Q
and feed wastage
O
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes p
Systems
O
O
BMPs to Control Insects- Site Specific Practices
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and other locations where "waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (Le., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer,15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated_
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
n Ik +rr - Nnve-hfrr 11. 199F,' Par-e 2

. ..
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge .of the death. The burial. must be at .least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
® Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal .pit of.a.size. and. design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
® Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health.. (Written approval of the State. Veterinarian. must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

(ro�4Lt �a�e flo,5 Fa.ra1_1
ANIXAT• WASTE Y.ANAG XZNT PLAIT CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR = ANDED PEEDLOTS
Please retu= the cc*leted foe to the Division of Eaviro= atal hanagement at
the addteaa on the reVeraa aide of thia form.
Name of farm (Please print
Address : b/� t0c,r /Q�[�
f r-i n c e Tc✓I / /Y. C ..t 7S"Au Phone No
County:
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:J_V Asp.5'a /78 3Q"(required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : Stu, ne - %Da;nct
Design capacity (number of animals) : -2 S'Sl0
Average size of operation•(12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
Technical Specialist Ce_-tification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
nm expanded animal waste management System as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,.
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria -have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access.
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stor=water runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm -
Name of Technical
Affiliation:
Address (Agency)
Signature. !° ce Gy/ .��c1L� Date.
MMM oxs
Owner/tanager Agreeaaat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. .I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Nam of Laad aD Cr (Please Print): 1
Signature 4 JD//
ate • I - - Cf t�
Nana of Xanage=, i different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DD-4. USE ONLY:ACNEW#

( � ,��- 11 � (' • � .,' ��� ���J -"� � Ip 11 I . I � i + I >,..* 1 � 1 � I I`—� �. I.
k � i ;1.1 I' p l ,. •
If
� 4 � � (\�-� , , / �-;` . . , ..
f ►1 � is -` � , :�(•" ' t:E' 1 `S1'-`,r•`%= t �, � ', �� J, , �� /. ( /
,' .. ,"—.i'ir �-'yt;��, —';I. I 11:. �.1� , is ;___',ti.. `1-'✓l,� J \� � _-_ - ,��, �"% -- ;
-� � \ '� a. !"��,; •i �/ �� � � C mil, tl l , ,/ � C/ E -T- �
5 ; �d �• ��/ _ II .) '+ `+�l��'. o, IN
pi E\ `� q i 111 r _/ . iv %� \`\ sr, �...._ � `•\
\ ° � �•' _ it �!i: _ �l 11 :��_. ��
If—
°
d
d• - � _ - \ li ((('�.. � to � I\.1�� � /~ ��(� ���`• I — - -----� I 17
:t/. V � �� I /i-dn�./% /< :-,�\.-:-..-..I � 1•/ ' S }._--moo -A '.- J .t c
Ej
tj
jPJ
• o �� 1,-� , � � p 41.
CP
T.

Emergency Action Plan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from you operations are leaking, overflowing,
or running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your
property to consider that you have a problem. You should make very effort to ensure that this does
not happen. This plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and
breaks can happen at any time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow:
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping contractor
• make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary
storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
'
• immediately stop waste application
• create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
• . incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system:
• pipes and sprinklers:
OO stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
OO close valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
Page 1

• flush system, houses, solids separators:
® stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
Os make sure no siphon effect has been created
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks:
• dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and
pump back into the lagoon
• if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
• other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, lagoon problems require the consultation of an individual
experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: 919-571-4700; after
hours, emergency number: 800-858-0368 or 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident, the exact
location of the facility, and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather
and wind conditions, what corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of
the situation.
b) Your integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Division, Maxwell Foods, Inc.
919-778-3130 extension 1430
c) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
919-989-5050 .
Page 2

d) Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 919-989-5180.
e) (For technical assistance)
Contact CES: 919-989-5380
Local NRCS office: 919-989-5381
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
a) OR&* EQuie. Co. 800-64q-150
b)
c)
6) Contact dirt moving and/or heavy equipment companies:
a) Teuir1 kiNG 06 - 5,784
b) HOlell Y0VER 244-1311
c)
johnston
Page 3

vcomeA C �c
DAuOy &04dF64Y ZA60.AJ
LAGOON DESIGN CHECK LIST
✓1. Copy of 026 and supporting maps included if clearing involved.
(including access roads and waste application system sites)
✓ 2. Dam Safety Exclusion
a. Dike not over 15 feet high to down stream slope and not over
10 acre feet storage to top of dike.
3. Storage Volumes
✓ a. designed volume exceeds needs
b. all temporary storage is designed above the seasonable high'
water table.
✓ c. minimum of 6 feet treatment volume depth available
✓ d. no sludge storage statement included if landowner so requests
4. Operation & Maintenance Plan (sheet included)
✓
a.
begin and end pump -out elevations shown
5.
Location Sketch (included)
a.
distance and direction to nearest residence shown
b.
road numbers shown
C.
north arrow shown
6.
Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34 included)
a.
distance to nearest stream in event of dike failure shown
b.
distance to nearest public road in event of failure shown
c.
topo map of area to support a & b above included
7.
Waste
Utilization Plan (included)
a.
all tracts, field numbers, field acreage, (available acres
excluding buffers for ditches, roads, homes, property line,
etc.) crops shown
b.
signatures of producer & person preparing plan
c.
pumping agreement signed by adjoining landowner showing tract
numbers, field numbers, acres, etc. if needed
d.
legible ASCS maps of effluent disposal fields included
e.
legible soil survey sheets showing all effluent disposal
fields included
f.
suitability of soils for crops planned assured
g.
attachment "B" on sampling procedure included
8.
Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG-538 included)
a.
minimum of three borings on Class IV & V lagoons
b.
borings 2.0' below designed bottom of lagoon
.- C.
location.& elevation of borings in relation to grid survey
d.
seasonal high water table at highest elevation
✓e.
borrow area location shown

M
✓9. Seeding specifications included (lagoon dike and other exposed
areas around buildings)
10. Construction Specifications (sheet included)
✓ a. need for.cut-off trench addressed
,�. b. need for sealing or lining with impervious material addressed
and -anticipated locations of such areas identified
c. protection of liner during initial filling and near flush
pipes addressed
11. Grid Sheet (original or ledgable copy)
a. gridded area large enough to include embankment slopes and
surface water diversions
b. location.& dimensions of lagoon & buildings shown (lagoon
inside top measurements shown and lagoon corners identified
by grid stations)
c. surface water removal (pipes, outlets, etc) shown
d. soil borings location shown
v e. TBM location & elevation shown
NA f. existing utilities located (if applicable)
12. Typical cross-section included
a. dike elevation & top width shown
b. lagoon bottom elevation shown
c. side slopes shown
d. effluent outlet pipe invert elevation shown
e. building pads - elevation & grade shown
f. cut-off trench shown - if required
g. liner shown - if required
13. Volume Computations
✓ a. excavation kaq..w #'' Pad
✓ b. dike ffll_�c. pad fQL(2V--4' ItU X4..wn �yc�{ot s-GS
14. Summary Sheet
*� a. design requirements
b. excavation volume
✓ C. fill volumes
d. cut -fill ratio
e. job class
NA 15. Location of subsurface drainage (if present)
✓ 16. Presence of utilities addressed
✓ 17. Observation of cultural resources statement included
✓ is. Operation is outside of jurisdictional limits of municipalities

LAGOON SUtU-L%RY SUL••LT & TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIO.N
Settled top of . darn; LO10
0�
3
I 'fop Width
I
4 /0 Construct top of dzw.
i'�. Fill Yardage: 63
I ALoo a1 JS' PA1D
1 Qlc �
�.s
-Natural -ground alcv.
--------•--�L�
------ ----xl--------------
ceal
— Depth deter(ni nd by
Di purid5 an l:i, ui p(ImWiL '^--vi• i SCS C)Il S;i to
Scare land uPl)lieacion2 - _ - Scop-land applie:,cion
Tulev. 38.3 elcv. 6, O _
I----'remNu --ary Voltinic
---- /
Sent
support —
2•S
Sottain elev. Z8•�
Trencmenc Volume
Top of sl udgo el cry. NA 2•S
------------------------------------
�- - Sludcjc Accunbulzttic,n -
Lagoon size: Length WicJth o210
I-SENCIi Piwo: E)L;iCR I F' 1' 1 ON : _zYAiL ioj ua " TR
LAGao,v yr PAD
Cu. YdS!. excav;�ted
66
- -- -- - - -
Elevation: -5,40,O0 -
GENERAL I NFORNAT I UN
JOG CLASS:
HAZARD CLASS: •c "
ANIMAL TYPE & NUM3ER:2?jj0 MEAD
KIND OF OPERATION: jrjLU SA1/0J6
NOTE: If construction is; nrit
started within ane year, this
ljl,Nn is not valid unL• i I re -
oval uatio(t of flnocl plain for
-za•fL--,ty hazarcJ it; ortzmlr'o.
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL WASTE
(SINGLE STAGE)
,Nalay Y—b" rAY FARH
S'o•�lWSTo Aj COUNTY
NO,CTN L°r4R.eGn✓A STATE
U. S. DEFAf;'fHENT O1= AORICULTURE
BOIL CON CRVAT I ON SEhV I CE.
DESIGNED DY: t2l
a �G riS
'f IT LE • C.E- T
DOTE:

f, 's
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill ,is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly. before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site if needed) to be
stripped of topsoil (311) and stockpiled for use on dike and pad
slopes (2-311). The topsoiling quantity is in excess of amounts
specified on page one (1).
Cut-off Trench:
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans. Remo✓L the i-4,'Ia ycr c +� s P M-i- sT" ,, o Caren
d n j a
�? C.o Yr��
Construction:
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in
max. of 611-lifts and not placed in standing water. Compaction shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of. unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be exc— avate3a minimum o of— ne (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted —with a S S approved material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soil
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other.bare constructed areas shall'be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction according to seeding specifications sheet.

• 4E
14
N
Ilk
r zr.
It
71

U. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner_ A1/VY rORAJ 6igA y County SbNiJJ?oA)
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam / Z . Ft. Length of Flood Pool 2-10 Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 4•--7 - 13
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
: Est. Elev. :Est.
ElevYt'ion
.
Kind of :Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope:
Land Use
Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. %
Ft.
Ft.
.
Gc)ovds
1 �000 Zoo 1.5
Fl.oaD PL4IAJ - occ-4SiA)
2 :14�aco :l000 .DS
S,Q /Bo7•:
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach IVo AP,#74RC-A.1-r /-'0 7Ecl7i,4L Fa,e .Coss jTF
_)-iPg &1 b bAHAgE To Qc1-;rji16 ore. R400ABt-e F✓7-yee
[/ d W d X---79 L-AM
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) w 27
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V) 1' L4,a01 1, C/Afs IZE
By 514 -.�
name
14, ,=-,
tit e
i
Concurred By F— a.-e- C
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date 6- /D -93
Date

(Al
0-15
—1Z
"<
. c'' \\
� 2530
em
�007
cp
r
e 1

ATAO
_W�,WF:j6pCON
Y 6
rA
i:.,:
x.
lk;14" t ".

SCS-ENG-S78
As,. 5-70
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
•• .-
-.
PHOTO
'•
WOODLAND- ACRES TOTAL --ACRES.' *6
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE NLA.DE (Approx. &cale 1,,._feet)
in,
■
^��.��
�■m"ago
mm`m
amm.w
I oil
i-
1■
■■IN
■■■■
■■■■■■■
■■■
■lag■■■�
■■■
ONE
■■
■■■
■\
■■■■■■■■■■
',
■ WN
■■■■■■■
SEE
JOE
1001
■■
■!
■
_
■■■■■■■■■■
�!
�i
wu�als���
C� '
� ��ii�.•air�ir�.'i
i�ai��'iii
I�cait
is�sai��
MUNI,
011=1
ulullimm
MEN
11-liff"IMMUNIMM
Mimii■i■±
±■±
±
±■i■±■±■±■i■i■±■�
�■I■I■
wol2���
'itL's�■I■I■I■�I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I
i

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION; USD'A'CL kkkFICATION
GW - Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels s - sand
GM - Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix vfs-very fine sand
GC - Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix sl - sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix fsl - fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands 1- loam
SM -Silty sand gl - gravelly loam
SC - Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures si - silt
ML- Silts; silty, Y. fine sands; sandy orclayey silt sil -silt loam
CL- Clays of low to medium plasticity cl-clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity sicl -silty clay loam
MH -Elastic silts scl -sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity c-clay
1. Suitable material for embanlcraant is available EgYea 0 No (lnd,care wAere (o"I" on rn, SkWA On
n.u.ns. s4l�J
REMARKS:
2 Ezplein bazarda requiring apecial attention in dcaign (See"o.. ,y,rnu..rwh atc.)
GENERAL REMARKS:
F-17
1AA
TEIJI
I

5
Operator:D. Kornegay
County: Johnston
Distance to nearest -residence (other than owner):
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
Date: 06/07/93
1200.0 feet
0
sows
(farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to feeder)
x
522
lbs-..
= 0
lbs
2880
head
(finishing only)
x
135
lbs.
= 388800
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs.
= 0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 388800 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 388800 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet - L.inolownc✓ L S5&4 r.
s40 ray e. 14 c a as il,r-Cde./
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 325.0 feet ; Inside top width 210.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 40.0 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 2.5 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 39.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 28.0 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 33.8 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 320.0 205.0 11.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
320.0 205.0 65600 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
265.0 150.0 39750 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
.LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
292.5 177.5 207675 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. _ (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/
65600.0 207675.0 39750.0 1
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 573879 CU. FZ

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
.DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
325.0 210.0 68250.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 68250.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 388800 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 95178 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recircula
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallon:
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amour
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume '= 39812.5 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 38106.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 95178 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 39813 cubic feet
5D. 38106 cubic feet
TOTAL 173097 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 561897 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 573879 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 388800 cu feE
At elev. 36.0 feet ; Volume is 388667 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 535773 cubic feet
At elev.. 38.3 feet ; Volume is 528599 cubic feet (start pumpir:
Seasonal high water table elevation 33.8 feet
7. DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY: : �l'• a-r.�/� L'. E 7
Go v FAV- Ms, i Ne • - /o - 93
DATE : u q3 DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------ w
lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
min. odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level -to be
reached (permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions
flushing operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on: 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after evaporation;
and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the
average of once every 25 years. The volume of waste generated from
a given number of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year
and from year to year. This estimate is based on 7 inches of excess
rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in
a year. The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of.8 inches of excess rainfall will need to be
pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider
in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be
available. A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed on the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed on this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth (6 feet).
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during .
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging.is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. .This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.

3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 38.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 36.0 or before the fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year storm
is 134991 cubic feet or 1009731 gallons. As stated before, this
volume will vary considerably from year to year.
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

e
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
----------- -----------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 3.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
24 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0 LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0 LBS. RYE GRASS @ 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
3000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
6 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
300 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

rM
Total Volumes
Grid cell size: 5.99 by 6.00
Original drawing scale: 50.00 ft/in
Project: Danny Kornegay
Drawing: Drawing 4
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Date: 06/07/93 Time: 13:57:47
Final surface: Proposed
Initial surface: Existing
Tight Volumes
'Cut 18648.38
Fill 11963.31
Difference 6685.07
All volumes are in cubic yards.
Expansion (%)
0.00
25.00
Net Export :
1?-;_%� : / s-4 . i
Expanded Volumes
18648.38
14954.14
3694.24

Site Balance Report
Grid cell size: 5.99 by 6.00
Original drawing scale: 50.00 ft/in
----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Project: Danny Kornegay
Drawing: Drawing 4
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
Date: 06/07/93 Time: 13:56:48
---------------------------=------------------
----------------------------------------------
Final surface: Proposed
Initial surface: Existing
There are no "Proposed" structures.
Fill shrink/swell percent: 25.00 Cut shrink/swell percent: 0.00
Balancing to 0.0 +/- 10.0 cubic yards
delta
Cut
Fill
Cut - Fill
0.000
18648.38
14954.14
3694.24
0.423
16418.04
16800.86
-382.82
0.383
16619.26
16617.17
2.08
Raise "Proposed" by 0.383 feet.
i

Orientation: -225.0
55.00
50.00
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
Upper Right
Z Magnification: 10.0 Inclination: 15.0
4.Z:'
i
3D Mesh Surface
Proposed
Project: Danny Kornegay
Drawing: Drawing 4
Number:
Location:'
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
A
3D Mesh Surface

Report: Plan View Cross-section Locations
Project: Danny Kornegay
Drawing: Drawing 4
Surface: Proposed
Prepared by: GOLDSBORO HOG FARM using SITEWORK
- . . T:._. gA•In•nR

0*889
pasJdojd
�
1-^fmx»
- � ----------��
--------~--.-----------------------' --------. �
mwTX3 V �
�
---^_.----.--.------------ ., � ----~-----------------�
/,-
�
,..
--..----_.—..—.-----^----.---~--. ........................... .................. .----------.------------
~,~
poSodOJd
------------------~� ��������� �=��� '.--. --.. ------------------------

� .
. -,,��--�~ �
-------------- ^`°^"�. —� ��----- ------------'----------------------
. —
.............................................—, .......................................
muTI�;Xs �
.
---------------'r-------~'------.` -----------------------''
^`
L�� _ . . . . . . . _����° . .�__________.�__..
...............................................-- --.—.—.--.�—.—. —�\�� -.^ -------.—� . �
posi'doJa,%
_-'---``'--�--'_
--.._.--.,—,---.---..---.---~,—.---.---------..---.............................---.----,.-----
`�
�%` �
_.,-.—.---.—..—.-----.----.----..--------------.------�^^---.I-------------..
'
Sul: STX3
.o-u

Own 0',
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name--:
Mail Address-:
County:
- TnAn,54013
Type of production unit----: 5w';ar - Feeder T �inis
Type of waste facility---
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the`waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be.used to reduce the amount of:
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields�..­.
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization.plan'
-
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests;:
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced 'for:
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value.:of_
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff.to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of/facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year: _--
o2B8D animals
x 119 tons
waste/animal/yr= to'ns
total waete`';_�°_:
-
.ti �t .A
� •`w t�� i�..s ..

of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
animals
x lbs. N/animal/year =_albs./yr
Available N
Applying the above•amount of, waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 18O-days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every b
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to -
No. No. Type Per Ac Used Apply
;�338a
P°sFs; d"
uckee,
Coadra
%
. 4-
o
`5
Coa iA
8' o
b0
6bo
/J �yaC
o45 a
V) Tgls,2 g.
o o
p
636 ebc.�✓
(,coy a
836 bcow
Coaihtl
5"
3-4z
v 0
9,60
a
Noy
},G Gsl ebc •
E s
..
'oa a
`�?ons
Od
S,DO
000
asp
370 V ..
f
s
oo
57S11ch
D
ca
$
h�ao
S71 Uchca
3c AL c •w
Coa I
-A
Total (o (IS
Available Nitrogen
Surplus Or Def'ci --/V
Narrative of Operation:
fiaoae�
Fs�O�isp�c/
/nr /Jc�neaa✓ was_ 7ak) 1iu� L`�'•//L cLG,/OAues 7ai5 inR D/,l,rP ,v Qcre5 /.v v
I n W,P -A, 7Fuit o s a 17' of rp,zle—_ 1, Wjd Y / 5 0,s
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared by: —
Name Title Date
Concurred in by: 4&- (0
Uer Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

d
4tc4-
X1.
.1
M
pi
N.- N-W
IV
In
Its
1.4 q
t3l
-;W7. IN
j lz
17
51
Iz
rs 4
C4
cl
or) r
it
--,, P,
rl

ATTACHMENT B
.4
. Agris-Waste Mwna ement
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
;..LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING,• ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi-Solid-Lot.Manure:
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic colle•ctors.,-
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under.the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B..Liquid .Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on. both ends into,
manure to pit. -floor.
b. Seal upper endlof conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lover end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from S or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix -and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or -tank
a. Hake sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump. or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsar»oles from about S pit locations, from agitator pump.
or from manure spreader. and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering:;;='__;
Department, North Carolina State University. Raleigh. ::C. = -=
1 of

tt l l et\. rL'l L. t. A.
-2 of -3
C. Aix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container. /
C. Lagoon Liquid
• 4 inc of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
i. Collect about 3/ p
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container,.
ii. From lagoon
a. place a small -bottle (1/2.pint or less) on end of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within 1' of'liquid surface.
e,•Empty into.a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, ,and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually insect undpfeederster andfor areas vaterers,oandaquality, •,
estLmatepercentof
areas aro -
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate
o
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality
other 4fsubsam subsamples fromeders and rers. take I remainder ofsfloorple there surface. and the
ocher P
c.-At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down CO
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about-2-3 •lbs litter to a'nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5-locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Hix, add 2.3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.
•

ATTACHMENT B
II. SAYLPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
±.a._. A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
• B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable -way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are. also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond. VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3315 Winton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders.
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
3 of 3
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquids sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N. P, K, Ca, iig, Na,
S, Fe, Mn. Zn, Cu. B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Mo. Cd. Ni, Pb
Prc

plt gELH/�Klt&
E...
.... . . . . . .
: i
...
i -
•. _ _ I _
— ' — -
-
AT
-
j
.. - ...
-
„.
-
- - --- --.
- Y -
vtccT tiiJE�
�_.i.
,.
JFP
_
- -
,
7-7
37-
7
z _:d.c� -=-•-----=-- -- -=-'-..... ..... _ _._.. _ ._.... �'., - - 3�9 ._ _. mot•$ _ _
_ .. - - --- --
- - --_ . - - _ _ - _ ... .-- -
�rS•
' 4Z 24.¢��� 3r.4 �►1 �:1• iii4
r-
- '- ----21,g__ _ Z o_. i�z _ _ 3a�- - • •3c £ - _ 1.7_ : _ 3�9- _ _ : 33:?-- - - - - - - . L Nam.. �SdCJ?�7tf�l�
- - -
- --
-------_.10--�: - -=
— -- -- — —
26
_
Z7,1 -,- tab - �Y 114 ;q r;,, - �: _ 3;� --- -, •,
__
I-N
— — -- - - - — -- --- -- - - -
- - -- -- -- - - - 40 3F. -aV ------
-- ------
- r—.
- - — -- --- —
- .---
. t
cf- p_,r .d
—77
CA
O
-wd
r
I
--z`
—6�
— --
-- —
�% --r u��
L: Llt;71 �:'7
:dam ,�Z• LL'n col; -' Ti tiri f•n
;sue
1�� -
�, 7a:t-107, un: uar,i
ire