510028_PERMIT FILE_20171231

I
h �t
y,rm k
RQUALM
eivisai ��l , jrE!
1:4
a 'y
5 R � 1 R •
'tY•f 1 �b1�
AID'- df+ 4A - 1 • •
JarC�
r;.. , ;.� `�' Y
_, - 'C'f s r +.
9 Cypk��t} Fro' f �ii.
r rx1 -: i i
i"'?i,°.
R.
g I
-t
� i 'ate;
-
�, s •,+ �, a,�' I R � ft
; �, y�;, , ! x'':T � � •'
�' ��r{Y° ary
rfd r p a 4
I
F ..y'
'f
rA �� 0 J. y' r+ i ',� 3'1 Y`,.•
yyl r.:
1. � �-rg'�.,,.
�F.+X-GIONAL
•
f, OFFICESO r
Wx.R!"R,+. # �.'4. .""��'+>�i7,+'1 ^'. 15 •
\98)
:�1y .- �f- y{, ti , ti. ...
_ ^. I 1
eI
"%�"sf}�>�'�1.3rJy,�!] kr++`~�i7„yl •
t r,+. �" r _ .
,� q�R,
'Y`
Ral
tssWngt giaaal WQ Supervisor =� eigh Regional WQ Su�emsor
�"
63:Wa$hiyngtoti Square Mall } t ' A ' 3800°BSim Dr
�aetielgtoa; N127889
i Ralelgh,''NC 276113
i 19)°94frG481'Y'=.
,F , ,s
Y.AF ` ' •• (919) 57l -4700 "•''
f '
ax.(919) 9753716,
•F
'' 1);1 �� Fax [phone]
y
'}'„ ' V 90J` ` YkY'� .,
r i "'i 1 �y1 1yf y'
{i'tS +71-
`:,
tanfOrt DnC$
1* 1•
Nash
}Cyh'a{t�ha�m
♦h,
+d ,. YW WW1 c`�^ NwhampWa
y-
owanrl�T ;+1aa�allCO •r'
st��F r � 4 t� FiaAlsllns . • Pawn t ;
Y
•�.r
i•�
��,.L
11VliWa.'
.GraYVW�i. �r. Nancey R �
'' fr�:'�;"". •'•'
$jrd ick' r ^Payulmaas.
•`-
� � " HB11fax a' Wake
'
� w;
F4
]
JOhnSton Wil=
I.Icc.
wiisOo
ig
1 �9Q• b- .Ri
r rx«tfar�l twa�►ne,
�j
„
+��f� y ,� t d ' *3c�i IL 'F'.'yt M � , ry !
+•" Hyde
y 4 =,.� ,� 7 .
IS. '
J S 'l� • ,.
-
�'�. a, �r�>ar°,. �LI��Sfh���h5 , t• �
�l�:kr � s � �
�,
] �''�4r +�. '
fir'. ti,
s�
vi
�K;tl.„ ,}r ri��,$� ]"'J,�„F -.�.k +'..
� 'gig R{ ' ' _ '•y ' • rr' r ' a a . 1 1. .,,s � •
iooresvW6 ReglanaUWQ Supav sore ­ Wilm ugsoio Rcgi�ar�yQ" Supgm' or, '
n
19'NoitllMaia�Stroti�'
,�''�° `, �127 Cardiaal Thine'Exteasioa ,'
� "%�"�'r�, ;
}ogricsvilli; NCf281i15
}i'":
Wil ►ington; NC 28405`3845
,Y:
T04) 663-1699 «"
k>� �, ,� 'i (910) 395,-3900
ax�f704)T66MW ]a.
Fax'[phone] 1}
Jexaader 4 ,UnCOln -
' '' 1 �r '1'Brunswick New RaElOVGC
, c
:al amiss` ;kcr,icieaburg Carteret Onslow
h, PC'IIt
h ra
nnataw���l�a��Z �Owan
ye:)
n, �C.O1�L1I111111$
i ,'1„ Duphn.
fa$±,Qn>R�r Y ff'�? La��Qi^
� r� � 4 "s„ •
n�Y a- '.y. ,'r�
ft 'Z• ,
..,+y I�S�'T 71� I,
, x`
�. i..f l,}+,f1 -
,
�-i�1 , '��r �+ �ti�'tR'byaRk ..
^.�'"� ��rs;• f r,,,i.-'
K - :�i.r,,,a,yK .<..+.1,. N- ,++� .�-•,.
'', �y' ,.�yy�,� a!'R�' '_-
-'4.i;a
i Yrs..Gu^;' �' '.
rsaaR.aay-. 4 i! •V!. '1. � ] „ � `^' ,,i� N as � m^ a
ALI►ff �.;�7dn'h,�a.'•j'u,�`'R�"TP Rca� � '� ql^ t'}+L pdr 7�F,3 � y��',, �I�+F r •''i�'�� •Y r'4` Hr a Y iS. � 4 r i� q�� 4r F $ Y iy('-'rf y �" rr ��.••,�
FMB{1V�ikLr�S+,�Fx-#h.+ R','. Vyi,� k. ,'+�E n;;'i1.ny _" .3. t} s,'.��z'+
') ! 7 1401 ?'�'�:1��' : 7 tie ,''1 `
�>•b� b ?a.+e�'y., {�xF��iti'PI f,>'r :µ�t�? $a'ki �i]..3,; g Fk''.,, rK.�R J,.: a tins-aa i.. - + ;i�''4: s r e�t�},�,,�.+' ,
�Is
Y
�c�R
J��+f
f tQl(��3'�'rvi:r9,
4a <a t~ fy'y ai F.a. _ s - j' e• -s, s 5 - ro 3:s ° ..
f .Su}}{��
fs
F ,rwataa a� ,tit^ 1a< rs r k' ��,47
,•,; bi'p;,,, °�1 �fL�,O tk T tYl ° 1<ti •h { 1 +��'5�+�`r y,.th '4j r � �-- ? 5
ZI
'}A�+��r�� 4�,'��'�,'� re�rt�ti}? rr `�fi e� ,� 'kl ;�� ^H � �? ^' �r*'�. •
�i ��1l'''h�i�'4�.�r��,.��f �+ ,per r Eir'�`,�! � .d:�.r�•4;.°��,{4S* '.f E vw ,,�,y; I, f;7 - r"
+ r e
M31VYi
Y .
•f ;'J rbtil �•_ f ., !1 ¢"4 � , i, �' rr 6
g P
a e 4 of
k ;..
i�'vtti� 5� r k.'a, irk •w !Y''h b��' 7 t. !
y•y,,i� � fry•13ip
Z sib �vf�-
3^'„+J1r';s'
Y

�S1`^+1S j f!"j ( t isIJ
Type of Visit: &-Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Gl outine O Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: [� County: _C Region: r17
Farm Name: Hog '5v' INC-ner Email:
,1 Owner Name: d Q� �( Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C"' -5 6afw ti Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: V Integrator: N13 — 5, _
Certified Operator: f±40-1 �j 'o k n so -I-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number: I e-q z 7
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Cu rrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle C*apacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
0
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P,oultr,
Ca aci
P,.
o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
-
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
!
Other
Discharaes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
NC Dept of rnvironmental Quality
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a p discharge? g MAY 2 t 2018
❑ Yes L.ZVKo0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[]Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑moo
[:]Yes [�No
[�A ❑ NE
[/]NA ❑ NE
[rflA ❑ NE
❑NA I—] NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
Raleigh Regional Office
21412015 Continued

1[;acilit Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
Ols storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑.Ntf ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the strictures observed?
❑ Yes
U 11 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e,, large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[2-11Z
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑/ 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�10
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[Z]IQo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
*No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑✓
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
in
12. Crop Type(s): -- (3 r t A .5-6, 0 G,S'�c�.�.
�r r
13. Soil Type(s): ` l a
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes [Df No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes NCo
❑ NA
❑ NE
^
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E2<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[3'1 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
o
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[2
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yieid ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility Fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes
U '�
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of'3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Z Date of Inspection: %
24. -Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gj'KO
i �,�
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Eo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �"
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ft; '''o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes RgfiTb ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes
0�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[] Yes
[]'5—o
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[}ice
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments,(refer to,questson_#) 'Xp1 rn:a'_y'YES answers and/or°any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use-drawingi'of facility.to,better-explain, situations ,.(use additional page's. as necessary)..
f fie. �.„el 3--as-�?
e-el 110-30(i- Ggs(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
Phonelf o— Lf 33— 3 33�
Date:
2/4/201

' ivisian of Water Resaurces
Facility Number 0 -]=ilandDivision of Water Conservation
�jgOther Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ounty:-v7k1A4_✓ Region:
Farm Name: fk Hoy i —C
Owner Name: i(
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: f,,4(S '� fj�t.i( Title:
Onsite Representative: `( _
Certified Operator: ,eV py` V(VSL'A
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone: ry
n
Phone: �j n
Integrator: 1J `'�>N�t(
Certification Number: Y 77
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 2 &W
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Qesign
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dry P,oultr
Ca acit
P■o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Its
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No �A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [�J'NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes D No
❑ Yes 0 No
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Faci ' umber: - Date of Inspection: i A .9 M
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2-1 o- ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No EaV�� ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _`L� 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the strictures observed?
❑ Yes
[J-Nc-
[] NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[ET �o
❑ NA
D NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
;""
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
D-N`6
[ ] NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[ -
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
En No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2-Ko ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ItAtA
13. Soil Type(s):
Gi
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[?�No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ea-l�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Cf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PfrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Rlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1�No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E� No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [fNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

jFcpility Number: - a. Date of Ins ection:
M
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[j No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Ca o
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
P!rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
2�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No [DNA ❑ NE
[:]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes [(No
❑ Yes [ZfNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answemandlor any additional recommendations or any other;comments (
Use drawings of facility tobetterex laln,situa#ions (usead'ditional ages asneeessary)''„rs } ': ,s;a �, g<
Ca<< �e1j, n�
5Cu-e Svc _ q,0 p— Z
tq 1 c o - 304r- t9 �s I
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone-jj `1J LZ3S
Date:
5� �(
21412015

10 I MS TVJ "f*- "71
(INO , Rec%q it
(Type of Visit: (1Corr�Hance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 Arrival Time: Departure Time: O County: �+�al_ Region:
Farm Name: �[y �w rCV�w Owner Email: rs
Owner Name: 'L Phone:
I � 4 •+,n
Mailing Address: JUm ^ it
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ATitle:
Onsite Representative: u
Certified Operator: L3 e-4� ; 4 ti( 4 6L,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
NC DENR Raleigh Regional Office
P/on
hone:
jc
l t -` J
Certification Number: UU 777
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
11 INon-Layer
Design
Capacity
I
Current
Pap.
Design Current
Cattle I t_V= Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
O
Dr. P,oultr.,
Layers
Design
C•a aci
Current
P,o
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Qther�_ jj�I
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Pouets
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [l'*N�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ZNA ❑ NE
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No CZNA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [3rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Fa ibt Number: Date of Ins ection ik---G
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [B-11153- ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ' 7.•
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
2'lqo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[!I -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[:rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[�T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[�JlNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[] PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Z e't'quA & 0 � 7,e, s, e- u- - c,
13. Soil Type(s): c Go lm
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[7"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[r�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [fNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E o
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes []N0
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
[] NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facifity Number: 10 - Date of Ins ection: Q_ 40
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [Z�M ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E3,M`o' ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Ulo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [g/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [LTNo
❑ Yes !["No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
[✓] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
/KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use dra fwings�' of facility to better, explain.. situations (use additional pages as necessary). • , :'
Ion
S( uj�p C
s 7
C. e�r-o
�tirn on
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: a3 �ck_
21412011

n
for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a Arrival Time: O Departure Time: County. -U4'4.f4_1 Region
Farm Name: � .Am rA" . Owner Email: O
V
Owner Name: Phone:_ 'ifs
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: u,(w �i,,,octA Title:
Onsite Representative: v t
Certified Operator: eAlv✓� ��� h 6
Phone: °' 1
541
kr.a_7J77
Integrator:
Certification Number: ! 0 Z 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
■
• •
�-
:
��� � "". `°} �.^;"�id
t
�.:.4.�
■fait
•
--
4,.
• • ' " • '
--
.
.. 1,
'fir" i ,s:
va.�^
�F°'. ' I 1 t�` r
■
• .
_-
�,
tl;wn
�
D s ; ��
r..
-.� y„
e+d t+rt"x«rye r. , _��'-' �r °F"�w` H
■
1 •
-
y. +mot• "�..
� �� " �ry W ins �n Y �'.: %i a,
■ ,
-- kx'.�p
■
,
_-
�:
}+6K,H'"t" �Y �R; :�4'�aB x^a.rF $ ? R'?c�'fi
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes [3-No-0 NA ❑ NE
[]Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes [:]No
❑ NE
t,'A- ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Callo [DNA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Q51 - jDate of Inspection: S
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E]�n NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
DNA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
DINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑i " 10
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to `❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [) PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
+(Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 9&44A --SG 0 '��'a'c
13. Soil Type(s): b 1 119'Lit _ 6 O
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
r�_O�C]
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
LJ fqo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[],N0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
F,7 o
❑ NA
D NE
Required Records & Documents
-No
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
El
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P]<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facifi Number: jDate of inspection: 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E&Ner' ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [: Ic ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [3 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes [�Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [:]Yes [, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
Q Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
34. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
Q-Go
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[—]Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer, to,question #): Explain any YES. answers and/or any additional reconriiriendatious4or� any other�comments
Use drawings 'of facility to.better explain'situations (use additional ages as' q'ecessary) M's
su,nJj �' is-F-i�( - v_s. ► � S.�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
P one: -333 Y
Date:
21412014

Type of Visit: OCompliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: I IV i-q County: Mil) Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: —q M Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: EN) $j(1[kj& [ CM�Sl ddr Pd- T"j-u- Ok
Facility Contact: C10/}I`,C 60101c Title: Ce'llq.tuPhone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: im
} a
Certified Operator: �'� Q Q In `JO iy Certification Number: I l
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,Eno ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

tFacility.Number: Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): OL
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 217No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 'VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �no ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Fr
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E!j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
(Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
;9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[21'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ILJ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
]Nlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
2r$4o
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
)2rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other-
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑Yes1Vo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
;2/Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�No [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
,EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
;?fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes j�j No
❑ Yes iNo
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yeso
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
O� rt,0,`�`c�rz ✓lQ_ owl C��t
41, 3f>tr'\
3 : S 'T- s30)a
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
2 4120 h

type of visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Zeason for Visit: 2rkoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /- Arrival Time: �hdparture Time: County
Farm Name: ()(ANe1`f) Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design C►urrent
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Fop.
;WetPoultry Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish rN
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
dDr,. P■oultr; .
Ca .aei
P,o P.
Non -Dairy_
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
$oars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes l <() ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

F,acili Number: - Date of inspection-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,: '1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes )Z7Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes pl�
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes _
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, et6 )
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 0
13. Soil Type(s): IQ
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes.E]'-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily a ailable? If yes, check
the appropriate box. Q : -j-a3=_=�CK
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps nlLease Agreements
❑ Yes PoNo
❑ Yes ,�o
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,,�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes�No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes, N/o
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ / Yes I f NO
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

F cili Number:
Date of Inspection:
Did �h aci ity fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
is the acih u o complian i per it con sPtitions relate1tl td'sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes o
the appropriate box(es) below. a 0 � -�) a—.LQ,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other lssues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ID'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VT No
❑ Yes ff No
❑ Yes ,�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. "
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)'. �
hQA1* al ac,e;j.{,,a , 3 -1 P� ° 4 c�S p nn
a3-13" h-a-5-1,3 1 1 3 a 1 e3(q
13 q-oa-l3 11t�f 63a:`3
5- Ll 13 5 `'5- 1 1' L' -13 1 '9 - 5(os j
i 1-.!q-C?-ck0 1100? 3tias
�- r-a►- r2_ 9-13-1 - 5 _ ly_l_11 a,py 03sg
&T\- t) �`p- t a-� ' �3�
1 V -
?Q__
6_M=
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 4 I J `7 / LL4z p
Date:
2/4/2011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection V Operation Review O Structure Evaluation C) Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: , eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: o VtriS 10 Region: (51V-6
Farm Name: M it) F:-tVr en
Owner Name:5 m [ACIr} =(CA r m
Mailing Address:
Physical Address
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: (' r i S & (' Lk) 1'0 K Title: JeC_I��� , Phone:
Onsite Representative: ti Integrator:
Certified Operator: (Vt0 f J S Y\2 Certification Number: 1 7_7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
511 (0 S tvLt_.c CU-P_,) 1a.ft10k_0 3 50 3 0 ►7 5 A)
Sz co
Swiue
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current Design Current Design
Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity
Layer DairyCow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current Dry Cow
DRY—NO-5PP. Non -Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
n1lolther
Turkeys
urke Poults
Other
F--- M
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
[] Yes J�TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
Ej NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No [I NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - 9 Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes JEJ14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes J31*4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes EIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EI'No ❑ NA ❑ NI
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste AllMication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): =) JV.,...!__IW AD
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes EE�"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes O—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination'?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
_Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes J-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ;allo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? D Yes dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

w
lFacility Number: - Date of Inspection: aZ
24. Did
Othe facility fa�illtto�alibraterwaaste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is tfielfa"cilityty ouutt ot-compC1W6c with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes C; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below, r () - a t - I
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes Z No
[DNA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
[:]Yes Pj`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes /ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes o No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
.0'No
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
�/
❑ Yes '-'
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field [3Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
TTT
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recominendations�or any other comments ' t ;i.�e
Use;drawittgs,of facility- to better explain; situations (use add€tional.pages` as necessary) � �'Iw
0?vo-It (v)-Na to 0( U a ;r-, i es7 ec's.�`j L CXAZ.o_ 0
t.U0p t-1 i -) ") (P a -5-- 1 3
tva0 33a `t -4 1 a,
tvvc i 3qr S -c-)3
LL, oo c6 053 i t � S - � - i �-
tu00 a/9 77
(-�r,r`'C-c't✓
CL') _145k� A-0
I q v, i..t_&b +I
Aa'k'_tX'0 try . dame
<Yn kA� F ��� 0 9- d 1 a U }_5 fi
Reviewer/Inspector Name: q' 11Q ��R
'
Phone: L7/ / — /?1 _V�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: a ' a S - /3
21412011

Date of Visit: jff()5-13, Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: M HQ Q U<' YY-N OwnerEmail: G[� c� � m� aC0
Owner Name: Beo+ori ZohAsD r,) Phone: '31 Q — a C2 O Do -
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Bea ] DiJ Sd 11 tif A r.
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
1
Integrator: LQ 0-
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design C►orient Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. C►attle C►apacity Pop.
I ILayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
11 INon-Layer I
PLIa Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Design Current Dry Cow
Dr, P.ouitr, Ca aci P.o , Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poult .
Other
Discharees and Stream Imoacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes , vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 01<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

F cilit Number: Date of Ins ection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
❑ Yes AE1 No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ Yes
PTNo
❑ NA
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNo
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C?(No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ N I?
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -21 77 jDate of Inspection:
)41U
h %%facility fa,' tto c �idnco�Veril
wasteli tion equipment as
required by e pbrmi , Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
_f c�lity o 6t coeDMni47e atedto s Al e? I�y�s�'c ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. �' j G 0 �_ 5) p P- 15 Ia y r�a�
ll
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes V
No
❑ Yes /PrNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
omments`(refer., toIg0estioi
e d.rawings of facility to b
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewerllnspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

RelatPermlis YVeI€s Fisids Sites Commenls History' Inspactlons Inc€tlents Enforcemenls Vlalatlons
- ...........Y r r r r.._.. _....
DBtallsed 1 Details 2 Bltling C€ass 1Desig' Events Reg Aialvifles Reg Operatldns - Structures. AfYlifa#Ions Reviewers
Permit. WSSi 0028 Version 3.0 s « Status tive
App
i �, , ,
Owner
------------��— - ---J&M
Lassee'- ..I:
Tract#
`' FleldfZone# :'
A. crgA
DnmirfaritSoil 9eriesF'':°-PletRatln
Hog
Farm Inc
4589
01
T06
GoA- Goldsboro sa...
J&M Ho
Farm Inc
5435
01
4.44
GoA- Goldsboro sa...
AM Hoo
Farm Inc
11954
01
6.18
GoA- Goldsboro sa...
AM Hog
Farm Inc
4455
02
032
GoA- Goldsboro sa...
J&M Hog
Farm Inc
11954
02
213
GoA- Goldsboro sa...
J&M Hog Farm Inc
111956
03
8.95
Gee - Gilead sandy...
J&M Hqq Farm Inc
11950
06
2,27
Gee - Gilead sandy...
__ it
J&M Ho
Farm Inc
11956
07
10.34
Gee - Gilead sand ...
AM Hog
Farm Inc
15673
2A
jk48
GeB Gilead sand ...
,
I�W�etsllrW�.�W�� .
IIIY'`" - amnve
i
„5
E„
,
CJext__— . f irll,ti' � �Ip5e
E slated'Permlts Wells . Fields`°° 'Sues �3 C6mmenis'' Hlstoiy" fnepections'` Incideriis Enftlrceinerote' Violations
R,
Oelads,l Details 2 Billing, Class14esig [':Events,,, Rep Activities 3 Reg..Operations LStructures AlYlilailons r- Reviewers
I
Permst: WS510028� - ,Version30..,, � , ... f .:'State§:
sw
i. .0
Entity 'Affiliation Type Name Title _ Phone Number
'Facility Backup Integra.
to r Contact Coharie Hn Farm [phone]
Facility .................................. Farm laanapar...-._............................ Massenplll GearQe R................. .._............. (919} 894.4fi11...._........................__ E
Facili Inte rator Contact Coharie Hog Farm [phone]
Facility iChris Technical Specialist Smith, --t Chris --- ---- --- - ----- --- -------------- I
Owner Ca -Owner Massen ill S 919 894-2246
Owner lowner Johnson, Benson f919 894 6629 I
Permit 18!lllnp. JAM Hog Farm Inc (919 32D 8DD1
„E Copy
,
7
t
i31
1
Affiliationsfaund Ready jSli? PMAF #

9 .
N Division of Water Quality
L
cility Number Q Division of Soil and Water<.Conservation
C) Other Agency
�ft `
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit C(Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:�L
Farm Name: Z a m Owner Email:
Owner Name:J UPhone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = 0 =' = Longitude: = o a 6 =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ TurkeyPoults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity. Population {
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Ileifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number,of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
[]Yes VJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

:V
Facility Number:b I Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yesio El NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes GjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 16 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
GINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]Yes
VJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
[I NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
,�
L/I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 Phane: o�Q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128101 Continued

acility Number: :5 I —CqZl Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the'CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes C31No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. cj�Rcil failito'calibrate waste applicatioauipment as required by the permit?
25.Did tcility fail to conduct slu ge survey as required by the permit?
/Q/0 1 LTZ'5, P
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by .
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes (A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
on jcw 6&xrj
�/ / j 9 a 3 s cop �rrlc cuca-'P
a o , gee f- a �� Q,t a./ a5
is s_► �i �
12/2&04

r
Permit: LOS S � OQ a$ _ Phone: q 1q- 8
Name/Contact: 4 ° rn igeog, Ahrn (c,t)fLQ�
Integrator:
On Line
Samples:
Sludge
Survey
Calibration:
Notes:
Designed: Size:
Extension:
S-S'$ R1 b

Type of Visit Qf Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visiit b Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:--—'�F Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �S & m 4r5i a c ne\ Owner Email:
Owner Name: i t r Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
� I•°-
Onsite Representative: �C Integrator:
Certified Operator:A-Dn}0rO $1�99 Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = = Longitude: = ° ❑ ,
Design Current
Swine C*apaeity Populatio
Wet Poultry
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
rcx
11:1 Layer I
I
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other
❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
- d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,Oj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
IlJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

4'
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ,2]s10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Vlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 2lo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �No
[I NA El NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ;No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application Outside of
Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ;05�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes Z1 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes fZ_ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes RrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [)io
❑ NA ❑ NE
..a s ` � " ..i�.'x >✓b x� ta�
lCamments;(refer, to,question #) =Ex'plain any YES!.answers and/o.r any recommendations oriany other comments
Use d'rawipgstoftiacillty to bettee;explam situationsa(use Additional pages as necesstary,):
is 't�+'�_.v. Y' az Y,: ='xi `r_ ,-. 1 d. ,, A e li,.
Reviewer/Ins ector Name s'A i d ",
�. ' '' •. Phone: 4
p "J , i k i.4
�• , g, , � .". e �
Reviewer/inspector Signatur Date:
Page 2 of 3 r 12128104 Continued

• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection V
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 91<es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes P?<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
!
d
[I<o NA
[:1 NE,
ElWaste Application [IWeekly Freeboard [IWaste Analysis ElSoil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
P!fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
KN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewerhnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 9f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Addrtional Ciiintnenfs
Q Si
9 1 �s o 13 33 �n
i-aa-10 'p,a W091Sy
e� 1',-a3-01 a, Q, wn3g3S
—1y'c i It E W0 1 a LAI
tzoll'ia443
Lo
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility.,Number
*4Division of Water Quality,
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation ^t
O Other Agency
Type of Visit r Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other. ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: n UU.- Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean U UV
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts j
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = ; = Longitude: = o = 6
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischar_ les & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current ,
Capacity Population;;
❑ Dai Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Daia Heifei
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge? '
M
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No
❑NA
ONE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J2o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes' "" ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
J
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes �No
El NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
ElYes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes V(No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA [IN E
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ;a No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
El NA
[I NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
..h,; .� .�'�.�.
�Camments (reteryto queshan #) .,Explain _any ESPanswerrs�and/,orfany %ecommendattons orAny othencomments. .
ti ..0 t a is E. rk @ -1r
L1se drawings of acuity to bett r explain sttttuationsd; (ruse additional paages as necessary,,): n`
1•z."
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone: �OV
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 1 12128104 1Continued

Facility Number:7XI nDate of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ Rio ElNA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [I Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /No ElNA ❑NE
ElWaste Application [IWeekly Freeboard ElWaste Analysis ElSoil Analysis Els
Waste TransferElAnnual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
EYNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25,
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Vf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
W(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[IYes
26No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
�`
Ll No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32,
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
EINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
_Ad_d_it1 nal'Co mentsa«d/ Drawings•
1 -
AL
Ioff
rUw yea
b/19-101-
,P1}-�-
LC) •-t- h `1C ejc + 1 0 tj
p �c)U `�� -• U�
6n]
he iA to ,0
Page 3 of 3 U 12128104

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Ptoutine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: rrival Time: Departure Time: County: %EO ih n 54-0N Region&
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name:- C ry) H Gq FO,C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: &n A-0 Y\ 2 Z o, h 5 O I� _ Operator Certification Number: C1
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o = 4 = $I Longitude: = 0 ❑ 1 ❑ 6I
Design Current
Design Current
Design C►urrent
Swine C•apa city Popion
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
C*attle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
JO Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Non -Layer L j
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
a
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
Gilts
❑Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
EE-31 Boars
❑Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
LQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
�4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: 5 — Date of Inspection g
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage, capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
LjJ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
11No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
fff
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes
_,(
L�J
No
❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
i
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c . f,g%.1rS1tX
Commentsa(refer to;�question 4) Explamlany YlFS answesVandlor a ytrecomm ndat onstar any athertcomments
Use drawings?of�fae(lity t&4Uetterfexplain situations (use -additional pages aslnecessary}•
Reviewer/Inspector Name L tL- j Phone: t �-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection v
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
P(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? �QrpZrIi ,11- 'ii 1 ❑ Yes ❑'&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Co
26. Did he facility 1 toTiave�an actively certified operat1 C) ch e? ❑Yes P5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional probiems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes X No [INA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ YesNo [INA [INE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes (�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) /
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
r >; .� �e ik�? �'� �y.r� { r � � * .. g �'-"rL a �"�Ta � 1� �} ; t � . ,`�
Additional,Comrnents and/or, Drawings , y Ic_' f ,"s , , . ' . � ; . �� r r � aze, F y
Co, 1 i' b M++e. -- o Favjo—
la7
lyl d
S L �, + �► 3 �. a g`
_ U4" VmAj
S
fawn
StJ�n �
Page 3 of 3 12128104

i�
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ;
0 Other Agency r
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑l 1Denied Access
gxj
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:�"ftA5Wy Region
Farm Name: rn Hngt _FAg m Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator.wanw &a2laq 1ACTIyE
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number;
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 ❑ I ❑ Longitude: 0 ° = 1 ❑ ,S
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Cattle
Design Current;
Capacity. Population �{
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
4'
Number of Structures:
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes _
/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA•
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
III No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection V
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;d"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) KNo
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes PlINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes FfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
l n Ccnm
12. Crop type(s) j'/M1_r;-M I BPtrMi An(U,,v) S m (1(r.A.dt u,n (JI)I AA7. 1M r110i . nn to - F-im l eQ . P 1 ha v
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
R!(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Nj
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
lL/LO/V'f LVr11111"V i

I
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did _the facility fail to have C 1 iicate of Co er ge &Permit readily available?
JL11 C oc - �I Jo � -- OM
20. Does the facility fail to have al componentsNth the OM readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis
aste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
(((Rainfall PStocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections onthly and ]"
///
Rain Inspections ❑Weather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
LO Q VVA �+O Uo 4 1 { 3 y = O, $ <Oo V/1 `7
`
LO10 a, C)
i
(Aepowrs F6vnDxt0
•
12,128104

Y R Y
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Numbe6 002 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 03/29/2007 Entry Time:11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: J&M Hoo Farm Inc Owner Email:
Owner: J&M Hog Farm Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd Four Oaks NC 275248114
Physical Address: 5116 Strickland Crossroads Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°22'39" Longitude:78°24'56"
On N. west side of SR 1143, approx. 1 mile south east of intersection of SR 1150 and SR 1143.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues © Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Benton Johnson Operator Certification Number: 18477
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251028 Owner - Facility: AM Hog Farm Inc Facility Number: 510028
Inspection Date: 03l2912007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 24.00
Page: 2

Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
Routine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: f J 6 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: ?-R-0
Farm Name: i M J, n1 + S&i _ G Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: 6rw A6C eh A-SSr'�f6A L J F— Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
C__ t4 PrQ. i c
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =o =I = Longitude: =o =' ="
Design',
Current
.! Rr' - t
Degn�,Curi rent
.�
Design C**urgent
Swine
Cap�aeity
Population
WetPoultry
rapacity Population
Cattle Capa�ci�ty'�Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
z S Z
;u>
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean``
Dry Potry'-_
ul
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder"''`'`
El Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑
Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑
Non -Layers
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
El
Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑
Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑
❑Other
Turkey Poults
Number of Structures:
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0"J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ONA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
J'ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
- Continued

Facility Number: S f — z Date of Inspection t
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
iZ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
�3 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
_02"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evid nce of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
jZ7St(m_�/
12. Crop type(s) L 2G o �.a. / 6 C- �SG3,/ + lrcr 's
6
13.
Soil type(s) (, ; Lip t;a I
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 'LI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes jai No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination %❑
Yes ((� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/lnspectorName d f-fJa7 ; ' Phone: -4'/ <4LSao
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: / O
12/2R/I1Q Continued

Facility Number: 5f — Z Date of Inspection vC
Re uired Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the dMOP r3
eadily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNO ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appr priate box belWn
/❑ Yes zeNo El NA El NE
j�I+�rtd
El Waste App/ion ❑ Weekl+�Freebovdd ❑ Waste Analysis Elsoilsi ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ RainXI ❑ Stopking ❑ CropJYield ❑ 120 Minute ctions El Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and !maintain rainbr�eya ers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applit own *gmen0s /g1ired by the permit? 37 SGfN%
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?y/Tswq (07/
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? tl'
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a'follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes 9fNo
❑ Yes ;ZNo
❑ Yes ;�'No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes /VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[I NA El NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes )!I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
94d'Ittsoinal Comments and/or DraWin s
g a
e ' r r �r, 3 & w,
aa
27 J
a {�� �r� (rLO�
o�
MCOr(J/Y►1!f
12128104

Aj
Type of Visit 52r Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit )2 Routlne O Complaint O Fallow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 7-1 a.5 Arrival Time: f y r Departure Time: County: S Ira Region:
Farm Name: ' Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: _1 ___ 9e$ ?9 ad
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: GEbKGrF- [;iLL, CtNri% 9i'►:�u1frC,� Integrator: C a �-}��� �.
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Sack -up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ 0 0 6 ❑61 Longitude: 0 ° = 4 ❑
di
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [?'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes /No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes R�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes )eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
.12128104
Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection 3"r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
.)�I`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
�No
[]NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
)ZI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 I. Is there evidence of incorrect application'? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
%-3b I+4 ton -7 Yr6 11z .boo
12. Crop type(s) L w rg C 1W 16A
13. Soil type(s) C V—J> S a mg.- cr t t .Ir-40
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes & ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes ,iJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: S 7/ os
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 O
12128104 Continued

4.
Facility Number:` S Date of Inspection 3 e
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the A%LP3readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes
LZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
r—
El NA
El NE
21,
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the a propriate bex below, ❑ Yes �'}�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
..wz lj�� �`f 2- r3t3�a-
❑ Waste �lication ❑ Weekly Freeboarl ❑ Waste Anhlysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Raiy(all ❑ Stoc/ng ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22•
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
ElYes �No
❑ NA
ElNE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?4f ,q 4 1 a`f
❑ Yes VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? -3 Z_U ja f
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit'? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require.a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
El NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�{
Ll No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ,ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Fl Vac r;&n FI NA n NF
Addttllunal Comrnents:and/or Drawings „;.. ?.�=r'.dX a ? i s.r�u. k.X.
t X.
.�: � S � ? � �. G��.t;� MP�SS�+G tom. J �� ,,n 1r1•�{, rM I i.�i G
12128104

Type of Visit WCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit t2KRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z $ Date of Visit: I
Permitted OCertiiied © Conditionally Certified © Registered
4
Farm Name: F
....`....�..........................................................................
CE Time: I ! 11 oZ
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:........'; 0A n1STa.^f.............
OwnerName: ................. ................................. ........................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: r......... 4!.LIntegrator:
....................................................
Certified Operator:..................................................................... ........................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 66 Longitude • 6 it
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes Cj"No
❑ Yes ffNo
El Yes ❑To
❑ Yes WNO
❑ Yes L-J4
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches)
12112103
4
Continued

Facility Number: — Z Date of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
O'No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
ZNO
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�Xo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
r(No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[ o
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
13C- jyq-. rye 340 SN (GO.
12. Crop typ i Q Ft:S co rc
13. Do the rec ng c ps differ Xth those designated in the Certified Animal W to Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[- 0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
YNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
--❑No
9No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
IPINo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
ZNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
o
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
WNo
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
Air Quality representative immediately.
4"" ..f...,7�'V,.?" ,:! 59!2T .n<,-»\i:ii3..t ,�...!-," '-;4F€%` "oi5i'}•^y#! t'.': dP3;'."ki ' `53 ia.?»Sit�..i§,:e€<">nk:r°ies: ilii°""k'a§.y.;,<i,:k:iai'nFL"}:i:t..'R.'i°91Y:e�'�4}"' _,Y€:';�niC:�i�1 ..:!.f�'t`� .wi4e.ti`s ' �'.:.%.^�,'.�77k1"` i'� yi..:
Comments{irefer to'uestiani,#) Explsinany�Y'FS:answers'And/Qrany,reL'o1nnAiidat1i11iS!or3 ally;':otliEr�C01n11t8iAtS g�tgtns !i al g.$4t�3; Ess,.;'`'a}
,x.n4: y, .s€4a?� "„ix,";-# '�t,�..�,�! t `"�•tt,+a e�.,t.itie,:''a't.;�i4btc� 3.:,v � e.raaa:taia ia.t.€e`tL:s ,! i {. , � i... .;w�:;.�+u,aww�.u.
t.tt,i3 F�in.11i�...Y i1Y'i ixt 11..d Sf. j!� xx.x�::.z..+3w�xxil.F:a .»;.."€ S Sayi4ii�
,.iJse dsrawings:oi fscil�ty�to,better explain situations. (useladdibonal pages as�nocessary)i� �+ Field COPY ❑Final Notes w�' j� t'i����:'
. nR.S �,... .>Art �. , t ��,5..�.3�k:��S i'k�:5,. �.� ..[tli�W�.`�R s�,.6�,YS1>....1iF4zl,L-i,ii�P.!AF.setf�i ,1.,a.8.,, , v d,%b! „ill 9 1:: t€tt i{,. .4 1 R. F 6 , .f •3 �.r S N ...I �ar.��,. �9.. ki .. .if tl � ..1� . :ti,..§
S FE e't a}} :k i ;, i iiaiCt
RevleWerAnSpeCtOrNAlne S.iiH .�'€sit';.+i,. r+Ibts„••AL�Ll;i{ is�a« .!Lf:; 3Fori eta4tL�''
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: L1 "z3
12112103 Continued

dq
Facility Number: s —Z$ Date of .Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
PNo
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste NUnagement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) !
Yes
jz No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�No
❑Waste plicatian ❑ Froard ❑ Y�ste palysis ❑ Soil Sknpling 1Pj)6 a3
24.
�o
Is facility not in compliance with any applic bfe setback criteria in effect at the time of3esign?
❑ Yes
XNO
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
O No
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[[�
✓ to
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
V(yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
E!(No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? 7 JZ,r/ vy
❑ Yes
Uf No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 41 t/ay
❑ Yes
O'No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ painfall [:]Inspection After 1" Rain
12112103

p ll PA WS S 1 co z�
��
Type of Visit $ Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit .Z� Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 2- 63 Time:rO 13�3a
'Z
Not Operational 0 $ low Threshold
A"Permitted PCertified Cojditionally Cprtified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thres Id:
1�Cy t-aa..r-
Farm Name: J&` '� County: -0 AA S r d
Owner Name: Phone No: _
Mailing Address: (n-3 ri S r� c1c �y� /J� x T '�,�� ty ,S Z`1
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 6Qe R0— p SS Crt T) i�,Ci S EAQtd Gk Integrator: _ C...D9 A&k
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 & 0 " Longitude • 4 GG
Design Current Design Current Design �=;Current"
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Csi` aci Population Cattle Capackv Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder 1 10 Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish zSDp L-7 ❑Non -Layer ❑ Non-Dair
❑ Farrow to Wean
' rT
El Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Cap crty'
I❑ Gilts ' Total* SSLW t
EJ Boars
Number of Lagoons
- ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ l.a oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
061&tng Ponds LSolid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field AOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Yes ❑ No
Za
xYes ❑ No
❑ Yes fTNo
❑ Yes ;2 No
❑ Yes �Io
[3 Yes JP110
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: rj1 --Z$ Date of Inspection Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ort
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of,over appI' ation? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
i3/l�i rSir� 1rG(.i2 3» Sa
12. Crop type Cam/ uJ .',S53 ;'' SG-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified'Ani al Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Z• U
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ iIn anon, freeboard, waste analysis &soil sam�le reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
fK
❑ Yes P o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes `PNo
e�
❑ Yes nNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes No
1
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ' ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes fZNo
A.
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes *0
❑ Yes �3 No
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes PNo
kYes ❑ No
Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Corrititents� e'r too question #)Explain any YES answers a or anyirecvmmen�dattons or. any other
tUsetdrawin.gqg,,stof.facility to better explain situations. (use add�tional::pages as necessary) = F .
` J ❑Field Copv ❑Final Notes
..
L��•,^ � ?...�t�
Reviewer/Inspector Name R :. ;, a ,.. y ... ;•.:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .�. ' - !'.� '� Date: `Z r
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: ,51 --Z. 49 Date of Inspection z �3
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below C 'es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? J,
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P3N0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes PrNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 0No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes�7/, No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Ylryes ❑ No
,Additional Comments'andLOr_Drk*ings'.. +
.,..._ .
" C' 1- IJ b i CA r-E S 4-e -'/Z 7
Z; ✓C "tWtL 5 C-LEeAr-" CMAAly > )nQa,
CA r US>At-.S 1 �� �1.�rGEs r..) 4Z/—I; VaL-V M S,-
t� PV —j!EfL-S- 1 Pori D I tj-�17LA-49 i
1%Ld fP +IDS !L, Mi T& �o w�lA�— W
CMosr,-Li Z r Z-a ' Firasr� a~L�
UA i i ��.1 IS�i�� �I 1b o t
GIaJT,'ti��,p ik'GA� S"r Gi�Ent i `,J� C�r1 �i�r�a�IS r,
05103101

%, 1L
Facility Number SD7E=
pate of Visit: 'b o Time: I _ 3D
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
�PermittedErCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 'i M County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:G�—
Certified Operator: ,,j_Do 15a
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑one ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 6 « Longitude • 0` 0«
Swine Canneity Pnnntntinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
zD&a
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design .: Current; Desigwl 'Current
Poultry,, ...Capacity Population Cattle Ca aci Population
❑ Layer ❑Dai
❑ Non -Layer ; ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Desgp Capacity
�UtASSLW
Ntember of.Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holdifigg"Ponds /.'Solid Trap r .., s
g �� ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System R
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
WasteCollection & Trgatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) iess than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes LJ I No
❑ Yes E�No
❑Yes E
l
El Yes
El Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): Wo
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: cs — Z Date of Inspection rn off.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
ONo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
El Yes
Z`No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
No
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Vo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
L] No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
ONO
31Mj6rJ f�6 44gj'U.
12. Crop type L CAM jNrp a W ul
Sv.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those des' nated to the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Na
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
RRe �iirred Records & Document, %
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverhgc' Z General Permit o otherPermitreadily available?
❑ Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Cc i Zje iitnal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 7I_v- a ;
❑ Yes
ONO
G _11 3
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, 4r11te analysis & so s p e reports)
❑ Yes
crNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ YesrNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
,{CJ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
ElYes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
'E<O
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
2Ko
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments,i(reNr to question'#) Expisiwany YES answcrssand/or,any r%ecommendations arany, other. comments.
lUseldrawin s of;facility totbetter�explain situationS:it additional pages as?necessary) field Copy ❑ Fina36Notes
;.
.........
5,�11✓ F� IS �r li�f..�'�1' G
z : x. �fe�' S� 6ur�. � ►.£ J �T>::9 5r9 a — i� r cl's�c r)
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: s.
r
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 5 — Z% Date of Inspection Mtv o
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes [fNo
❑ Yes J2rNo
❑ Yes .dNo
❑ Yes N
El Yes 0
-.. , .
J�Additional ;:ommentseand or:Drawings:Ato�,,,. �; •;��.:.�,� .� ;p . .�., � � ..
05103101

Type of Visit QjCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z Date of Visit: Z 5 bI Time: f 1 '�
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
OPermitted,M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
Farm Name: ................. tJ..;tfjM........ Fr;nI: _;✓G-........... County:.............. ' 5,i......................................
Owner Name:
Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: 6.aocG MIAs �� Integrator: C� a
...............................................................................................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
awine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �� ��� Longitude �• �� �«
Design : ` Current
e:.. "• C`9nscity . Pnnulatirin
❑ Wean to Feeder
eeder to Finish
-zg sb
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
1 ❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Cur
P , try % ,Ga see � ,Po elation. ' Cattie Ca aci "".¢Po.,
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Tntai Design -:Capacity
T&AI . Ss L W.
f� p Number' of Lagoons ". 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area f
f Holding Ponds'/ Solid"Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System " r
inscnarges 6c stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes J3No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E(No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P=No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [TIo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 -2Continued on back

Facility Number: SI — Z$ Date of Inspection o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvemcnt?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Sao _qi__1 7-ao
12. Crop type et. 3 t:n3 1A KU I S. C-i, 'FFS cm T. _ �. / Cb" 1W A/s's
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 4AWr.l,arri4,
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? //
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified ma Way)g�ZVl//
Lgement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) sue
05
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrion, frc&oard, waSt�i(analysis & soil sampNe re gatiports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0;, N4'0010,� 00s' :or, 4r, le, �ipies -WOOD Pied• OW.109 01sAsit; • Y60 will•�-ee$iye oo fut b
......rsaoiidence. abnu> this visit: .........:....::.........:......... .
i
I,'eetter explain`si
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes�No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes jQ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ Yes C2(No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Yes ,(No
❑ Yes AEfNo
❑ Yes 2'No
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes ,fNo
❑ Yes 6o
i
j-oa K A L.a Z,k— VT_ Hai a &"TG o TIAX_g04­0 A -�tD 6 J.Ya —
UV-- boa Moos:nib jtX,,0V_ I�sA�i.S_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C]o s�, �",�� Date: -71 L 5 1 Df 5/00

M
I Facility Number. — ZV I Date of Inspection 2: of
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ;Y�0
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �lo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �'No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ZNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes E�No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes E�No
_"I
5/00

t
0,� :3f5Z
JoRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number .
Date of Inspection S 1
Time of inspection 1 T ; t 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[,Permitted PCertified © Conditionally Certified (3 Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
r 11 — ,
Farm Name:t..M....l�... t.................................................................
................. .. a C?........p........�....1"14....................................... County:..,...........
OwnerName: Phone No:.,.....................................................................................
Facility Contact: .................................................................. .. Title: ...............: Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................
Onsite Representative:.,,, r� tZ��„A •S.S C,; t J K- Integrator: Inte ........... � (JR�
..................................................... �, N...........................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ......l
............................. .. .................. ..
Latitude D0 2 Longitude ®0 �' 96
Swi Design Current , " s ': Desegn' Current DesEgn Current
ne Poiiltr Cattle �, !S Wk a s.. ,
t
Ca actt .;;Po nlationt _ X . Ca' acit .. Po` elation ',.:'Pii elation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
-Z9$D
7Z1318V
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
„
❑ Non-
❑ Other
Total Design Cava
1 �
Total SSY
t if ;$ Sri;�Bt -
x i 5+ �� ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
Number of Lagoons , r l ,� '
�U1�.„hi 1p ,
HoldtngPonds l Sohd,Traps ,'❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
W:.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes p'ffo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ZN0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 'PIKo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
i
Freeboard inches ..... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on Back

Facility Number: S — Z $ Date of Inspection I C7
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
O�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
;211 TO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
'Co
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
4
Waste Application
ZNNo
IQ. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
,INo
12. Crop type C, 6La S Ga a,-d CacRn) w £,Ar JS-QyF.FANA;C ¢=E9 uuk , PASTVA�,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t ose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PJINo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Plyes.
❑ No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J I ""
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
PINo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
eNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19.
/ /
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrig4tion, frecboard, waste anhlysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
0
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N00
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
J
'22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
'XNo
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
V�No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNc,
`
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
<0
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
To violatf Fcjris'or it #iciencies vt��re )iO ed- , 0.ting tb js'visit; •Your ;rvilN eegiye fr o; t'ui-th�r: :
carres• oridertce: about: this :visit:
tv.,1..a,� € rE
Useidrarvings of facVWX'Til�tyl,toEbetter explain situationsaf(use.addthonal pales as necessary)��t y'N�GI rr,I`1;,,Fi�E
t- crs'pa OL Ano +6a a'jT- Aac:F.n uttiratl A.
Q F µ�J Ib j�►�q c— _ �uRR iCA��- �L u�� �nnf Ate A'j'L JC%0 N OJA c_ idaS WiT{s,.J ALLQ W�rV
srAcra� �gans3� LAC, JAa-z-oo� _ i �t� Tco �^r cxC.� . r"ck .
/ O�-t7 5'rYL�Mi��-� ���I PasrS rtau! T1L�r AGM �S QEYLm'.7�!) Q£C�^Mfr1� :�oiC.£ �►4S:Ly ��CA�
5o�V sA^^P��s (0/7/'J9) S"-w Ra,-'_TtvC—Lj I-IGil LEJCL.S aF Q �R
A r rn 14� o•-rlo ,,,, �. 'F�`�e...as �i'• s�� a q
C.tr L4rL C. "VtJDr'
Reviewerllnspector Namen. r r"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q a,�} t Date: S 11 1 pn

Facility Number: S — Zg Date of Inspection 1 ��
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes eNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 160
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes E No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ZINO
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 01NNO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes �Vo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? �es ❑ No
' itiona
-omments,an or�
rawings:,
J
3Z)
nln �n..SC�22�
�P� CALL

erva Division of SoilWater'Conshon ew
'Operation Revi
d rf l,a,E€ `! �i, .r.Q IitYt' ion of soil and Water Conn eftatlon ;Coin" Ha Ce Inspectton
% ! 3 r9! �"- },ii "=t;"I llf ? -_E F..d, g 'f'I•'E 3+ tg
, D�v�siob of Water (�Ualif�, .L''on1 lianC@'�1iS
,i.l ,. Q `J I A
�? r I _t!; ;, €.l :,;,ii41 t a C�7. ikfl�� ! r �, €a', �6 ir1 �3!-I.'
�i0th�P 4�getlCy - �pera,. on ReV1 W'�a�l ftu � ,< .ti '€'v �°<`,s. P�RlG3h� h t � . rl, ri Sk,
jorRoutine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-ug of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Q Date of Inspection l4 ZS
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
C] Permitted 911clertified [] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. ..� �G pQ./� County Jb.l-�.!5 1.............................................
�...N1......f...............................................................................
OwnerName:......................................................................... Phone No:.............,..................................:......................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title: Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..............
f ,A
Onsite Representative:.....17r. .QQ. f.....![".\ .:L!t... x L.i rc...................... Integrator ...... q..9..r ................................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • Longitude �•�' ���
�l i� 'Design Current ��� I I I'• Design ° Cu.rrent Design
Swine, . Capacity Population Poultry; , Capacity Population "''Cattle Capacity
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Z_C eo
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
�[] Non -Layer 1 I;; ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other !
<. I Total Design Capacity
! 1 Total SSL'W
I�I'Cellt �
s
ulation ''
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes dNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? El Yes PNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, noti fy DWQ) ❑ Yes P40
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes VrNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ElYes YNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0'—No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes F!�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............. . ;" �. 3...a....... ............... .................................................................................................................................................................
...
S. Are'there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [o
seepage, etc.) /
3/23/99 -=��� Continued on back
fl

;} Facility Number: S — Z® Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ONO
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;dNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;;�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ;2410
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,TNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes �io
12. Crop type , a Cr•M � Q.p_ a _ r 6 p-AI ,.� ✓
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated,in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes �TNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ;eNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Z'oNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &_Documents
17. Pail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
1$. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
21 Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No- AdWh(ioris;or• deficiencies were p�teci dWing �his:visit=• Y'oi� Witt•reeeive iio furfte
corres• orideR 'e. a�ouk this.visit� • • • • •
Comments refer#o uesterin # iEz clam "an YES-answersAand/oran •recommendlation`s of an tother`coii`ime
}. ` P y Y t y r t .... ..., ... ,P... r ..,.r,r:.ild_6,..i ,.... "tb....�. L. :�...,< 6 �. ."d. ..�,, .J6air_
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 1ZNo
;'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes;! No
❑ Yes Pill'!
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �No
WAVE OkFlJNtr iSTS $-EQ � (,t:o �: tas>F� 6a �a�s a�- rA�pt..TwR'Fo�.
CZR.PwnA4" 13 19T f:-FA, 1i , t9C9
OSi TOrq- c-�&f 4a,+r hs a rQ46 4 AL,%, S—q S F-"e.^ TN£ LAMvr-
C__'b.M.p 46T La cram A1J1f o1"+t�- � a a�i'►P �- t9q
Reviewer/Inspector Name':'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes INo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ZNo
2$. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 1[!�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
I 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes/�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes et!]ZNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes P40
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes JQ'`"'
IAtiditional'C:ommenVts and/or Drawings. SiSynt �` • r ,; .4l AI!kti.:. 5 �`. ti_ . ' d i# 1 1.. I
n
3/23/99

11
"t16] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation,Review
[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation -Compliance Inspection
❑ Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
❑ Other Agency - Operation Review
IJD Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow -tip of DNVQ inspection Q Follow-up of C)SNVC review Q Other
Facility Number / Ihrti of lntipzclicEtr 3 ry�y
- - Tints. of, Inspection LLL�J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted Q Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not O er:ttional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. „!rt Colmtv:....�..ti S
..c.,�.'.... ..........�............... .........y..... N..................................
u�l.......................:...............................
Owner Name: I'hone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .... ........l'itle:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
it•lailing Address: ..................................................................................................................... .......................
Onsite Representative:.../'.7 .! .!v V. .4A1L ..!L/........ Intehrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operatur:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:,.........................................
Location of Farm:
..................................................................................................................... ............ ..... .. ...
Latitude 0 4 6 Longitude 0 LPL 44
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I
❑ Dairy
r
Feeder to Finish
tj
❑ Non-LayerI
❑ Non -Dairy_
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JEJ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes P�INo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the core eyancc than -made? ❑ Yes Z6No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes A No
C. if discharge is observed. what is the estimate. flow in Lmlhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes o
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than frorn a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes TO
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G /
identifier:
Frechoard(inches) ........ 2 ......b...............................................................................................................................................................................................
1/6/99 Continued an back

r
acility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any im iediale threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? 4 v
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
l_"LLl C7__lJ
❑ Yes /N0
❑ Yes INO
❑ Yes ❑1110
❑ Yes XNO
❑ Yes [10
11`asl,L Application r
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
11. is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes P1110
12. Crop type F.I.P....1 .....
..... .rn...... ....../,5..6..................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettahle acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
0. No.vialat►ons;or.deGciendes.overt~ Hated du.rin,g.rhis:vi'A., Y.ou.'ill.recceiv'e ito Nrtiie'r
egrresporideitce; abbot; this ;visit.; .:. : .:. : . : .:..:.: . . ; . .:.:.:.:.:. .:.:. .. . .:.. .:. .. . .. ..
❑ Yes X�o
❑ Yes ;ZNo
❑ Yes eE1No
❑ Yes e6o
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes �No
;ji Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ❑/No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)'
1� 't1 ►���7!' auG sJ?3 T % iva i Cev
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
0,4-C P
Date:
1 /6199

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered Certified © Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:.,,,.
Farm Name: .... zJ:4..h.:.`...... %?7n,k....:...................................... County:..G..1A%�'L. '...........................................
OwnerName: ... ...... .lJ^s?........................................................... Phone No:....►,�?.........� ......Z.Z.��.............................
FacilityContact: - � h',1... ........................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: :SL./.U.......s4,(, `i9IVj rrDSS`001-W l f f�d c<r... )41e'r ..�L.......�.7.� .� �.................
.................................................................................... ....
Onsite Representative:.. & .......� fl.l,t'" .f.'` ... Integrator:........��... ....................................
................................................ ............................
Certified Operator;.... �/J`�s"......... Operator Certification Number ..........
Location of Farm: 1:;" V . 11419
Latitude ='6 66 Longitude 9 6 44
X ' Design <�Current
s Design
Current
Dest n Current a
g
Capactty:Population
�_Paultry ;Capacity
Population- Cattle
Capactty�Population
..,. a
❑ WSgLLto Feeder
AD Layer
u:
❑Dairy
Leeder to Finish
ID Non -Layer
❑ Other I?3
❑ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
;;:
❑ Farrow to Feeder
„
Total Desiin Capacity
❑ Farrow to Finish
u
t
❑ Gilts::
N
' ` Total SSIL
❑ Boars
n
x:
N
Ntunhe Lagoa 1 Hnldtne Ponds' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field
„. " ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
h.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste. management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
ElYes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes UR
[]Yes rr�-o
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No /
l

`' Facifity.Number:s"/
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LaQoonsMoldini! Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure t Structure 2
Identifier:
......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ......... :...
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, o`r runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
d �
❑ Yes d No
❑ Yes o
Structure t
❑ Yes Ld'No
ElYes ld"No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2r o
15. Crop type R. eIr "! !' . 911.. ............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes LTNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
21, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes r<o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes o
24. Wany a io`nal problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes o
hTo.vitiiations or. deFiciencies:were noted during this:visit. You.rvill receive-no,i furttiei•
eorrespofideilce:alioutthis:visit:•;

Routine
Facility Number
O Follow-up of D«'O insne tion
Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
Farm Name. .......... ............
Follow-up of DSWC review G Other
Dale of Inspection R
"
Time of Inspection P24 hr. (hh:mm)
10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
County:....,}, k .! �11.Z. .............. I......................
OwnerName.......................................................................... PhoneNo:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................ .................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ....................................:....................................�'...�.'. ........
...,............
. ..............
.................
................
.....
---
......................
.....
...........
..........
integrator:...........................................................................„•,,,,.,•,Onsite Re resentative:,% .��LZ.:..'.........i"..........................
Certified Operator ...................................... .................... . Operator Certification Number .......................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �� 0 �°
Design Current !Design Current z DestgnF Current
Swine Capacity..: Population Poultry 'Capacity .Population' r Cattle Capactty 'Population ',
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boors
❑ Layer "' ElDair}
❑ Non -Layer I J:r,JEI Non-
❑ Other
Total Design CAt4
`: ;Total SSI
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If disch:u- is observed, did it reach Surface Water" If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
:W .
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
main ten ancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Cl No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
f•.... i:.. r. n�7 .... l.nrlr
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7hS1Q7

f
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures .Laeoons.Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft)........{...............................................................................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .........................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
P/No
Fo�ertified
or Permitted Facilities Only
//
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0; No.viulationsor deficiencies.were,nuted;during this:visit.- Y6uavi11 recei:ve;no-furiher,::
correspandehce d oiit -this: visit'.,'-'
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

A..-,
°c Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
O outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ection O Follow-ue of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered © Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
farm Name: yy, - Count .....................
� �'......I...`..,c......J-6i ...... ............. y:.......L�....I4�..�.TC1. l�.t.........
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ........................................................ .................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
..........
Onsite Representative:..... ..... j1.. .... Integrator:.......................---...-----.................
N �........... sue.....
CertifiedOperator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
c
Latitude • ' 94 Longitude 0' 4 "
General
l . Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
`j No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
dN0
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
dNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
LI No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? •
❑ Yes
dNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
V(No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
[!(No
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility in
❑
' Rf
not compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
q No
7/25/97
Continued
on back

�J
10
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Ef No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? OYes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): �l/..�...a............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes PrNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes A No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑A0
Waste Application l
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes XNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type S.t..../. GVe....... C.... � ......................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes VNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes )�No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? .IdYesi
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
EUNo.violationsor. deficieitcies.were-iioted-during this:v`isit.-:Yo'U"MH r&ei ve•na�furtheti
. coeres'pkidehO about this:visif.: .. ; : , : : ;
1'1JoA P-evie-iT
4f-Try 30 D.,�9V 5 .
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes '(]No
❑ Yes X No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
MWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DVVO inspection O Follow-un of DSWC review O Other 1
LL�Facility Number 1 2�
© Registered Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
Dale of inspection
Time of inspection b Da 24 hr. (hh:mm)
10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..............
Farm Name: ......... /�. r-i07, Eitr lene% County: jur7"rs...........................................^N......................
Owner Name .............. �" °"� ................. ,... J.�twsoN l`honeNn:............ 11.q... Y......�.z:2Y6.................
Facility Contact: ....,;Y...,,..,,..,,..JuYs ^' . 'f itle: w µ ........ Phone No• 1 -2Z
.....lI................... .......i�.......,................... ..... ............Y.....,.....6......
........ .............1..!.��5.:�..rt•.�.............t^'��stra�s .. ort r �5 ..Aft- 2
Mailing Address:....,. sue... 7 �S Y
Onsite Representative:......... ............ ; � NS j. ............................... 1 ntegrator:.......... iV)......................._.........................................
Certified Operator ............. .t'.✓ of .................... . J�h "' sv,J ..... Opt'rator Certification Number..........................................
G� t
Location of Farm.
................ ............................
.............
' ;roiSYo ... 9................................—....................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude •
Swme
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
'Z g$d
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds C
3
Design', Current ', .Design Current`
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle ' ` Capacity Population
❑ Layer JE3 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW"
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/inip rove ment?
❑ Yes
©'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
[�-No
Discharge oritinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[(No
b. if dischar-e is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (lf yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[Ko
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in tTal/niin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systein'? (If yes, notifv DWQ)
❑ Yes
((No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E 9"No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
[�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
GfNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
INN
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97
Continued an back

FacilRy Number:,-/ -fig
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,llolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: J
............................................................................................................................................. .............................
Freeboard {ft.)' 2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste ;Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .............G:! 9.5&1..........................................'�..!J................................. PS..4 ,..........................
...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2 L Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl�t
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes [/No
❑ Yes OTNo
Structure 6
........................................
......................................
❑ Yes ETNo
25. Yere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violations or. deficiencies were noted during this, visit. .You:will receive no ftirther. .
cbrresponde'nce About this'visit:.'
❑ Yes ❑'�lo
❑ Yes [9'1i0
❑ Yes M
❑ Yes 03"No
......................................
❑ Yes t'_'<O
❑ Yes +[, 'No
❑ Yes [T"No
❑ Yes E3 No
❑ Yes []'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 040
❑ Yes 12<o
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YE5 answers"and
/or,aity reeotninendattons orranyother comments
x, „ ,. ,e
Use; rawiniys:of facilit, to bctter. explain situations. (use additional,`uaee5"as necessar'v}. .E� ,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name q r mMV
�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
�M%
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDP—HNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
Benton Johnson
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd.
Four Oaks, NC 27524
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summaries and Corrective Action Recommendations
Benton Johnson Farm Facility No. 51-72 Johnson County
J & M Hog Farm Inc. Facility No. 51-28 Johnson County
Dear Mr. Johnson,
On July 8, Operation Reviews were conducted of Benton Johnson Farm, facility nd. 51-12 and J & M
Hog Farm Inc., facility no. 51-28. These Reviews, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD, are one
of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of
Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Reviews, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. Copies of the completed review forms are
enclosed for your information. The following observances and questions were discovered and noted for
corrective action or response:
1. The vegetation around the lagoons needs to be mowed to permit easy visual inspection.
2. Start and stop pumping level markers need to be inserted in the Benton Johnson Farm's lagoon
prior to January 1998.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
10�.14_ -� 42'�
Margare O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Johnson Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NVCV An Equal Opportunity pportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500/6 recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

15:2e FROM
LEhi WATER QUALITY SECTION TG _ RFO P.02/02
Site Requires 1nrnediate Agention-
Facility No.
DTV-ISION OF'ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ---"`_
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. / C -1 7 , 1995
Time: / Yl U
Farm Name/0wne1:(3u r�-l-t Z(a 4 n T 0-11,
Mailing Address:
county: Grob, k. 11-0--
Incegrawc: �.. . �. r -- __-- Phone:
On Site Representative:._ _. _ Phone:
Physical Address/Location:--
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Castle
Design Capacity:. Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number- ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_ _ -
Ladrude: l � Longitude: 21 ' 1 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Wasm Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of i Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
�apprwdmacely 1 Fooc + i inches) (0eor No Actual Freeboard: ',:E--rc. _Inches
Was any seepage observed firm the lagoons)? Yes oll Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate laird available for spray? s or No Is the cover crop adequate? 110,or No
Corp(s) being utilized P�
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Qor-N%
100 Feet from Wells? 6 or No
e animal waste stockpiled widhin 10.0 Fcct of USGS Blue Line-Savam? Yes o o
aYli nal waste Land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Line'? Yes o;,Nck
's aRiuzal waste discharged UitO WaLets Of the State fly iaari-made diiCll, fiustzing system. of uthec
`;iTri;a_r man-made de -,,ices? Yes broP l_f'Yes. Please Explain.
� 5 Iilc f ec-ility maiwain adequate waste macagcmcnL.recoids (volumes of ruanure, Land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or�
,Addirioual Comments: % Ltro1�-
YU iLGs
S igh a lure
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed

-TUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEN WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate A rtendor-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGENIEN 1'
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SYM VISITATION RECORD
DATE. 1995
Time: J'rr M %� �- 1 � r►.,r ,�'u c .
Farm Nanr<e/Owner:�,n 704!►?s_
Mailing Address: S�1 �►o _� •�� rl[ IT �_ Cftss= ► is _._...l�c�r... �� 1.1�C.
County: c x �►
Integrator. v Sr .- Phone:
On Site Representative: _.. �cK7o�ef _ -- _ _ -- Phone: `!rf/89�
Physical Address/L.ocadon: 9n lllarn - dt- at 5- 1/91 go"—r 19t...,
G q •1 ra
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Zs -ea _ _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Nnmber: ACE DEM Cert ficarion Number: ACNEW
Ladtude: Longitude: Elevation: eet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient. freeboard of I Foot -t- 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) 9 or No Actual Freeboard: _,Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or &1 Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? ?9or No Is the cover crop adequate? or No _
Crop(s) being utilized: *ea r-rp s
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No xo well, ? a,„ d d
;r arimal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of i7SG5 Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
a,-dmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 .Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lane? Yes or No ua�
'; ani.m.al waste discharged into waters of the state by znan-made ditch, flushing syscem, or other
';iT'nHar man-madz dunces? Yes or If Yes. Please Explain.
' titc facility waintain adequate waste maria.gerncTit records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage With cover crop)'' Yes or No
Additional Comments:
cc: Facibry Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

7L'L la-1SQ5 15: ?5 F,Port GEs•1 WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRLI P . 02zG2
} Site Requires Immediate Agendor -
(� Facility No. _12 -Zr
DIVISION OF EN MONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
A'VTNIAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 07 2C 1995
'• Time:
Farm Name/Owner:_ rh7te �olinr - - _
Mailing Address: vess n�c ICccN� o C. z7S�y
County:._- �Tcl�`.s�c✓�
Integrator: n Sr Phone: i rj- Scs-
On Site Representative:._ Phone:
Physical Address/Locadon: v Pi No,^ .r,
l�u,t 6- a ►i r ram;
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2-ET-6 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE
DEM Certislcadon Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:
Circle Yes or No
Does the Azi.mal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) 62 or No Actual Freeboard: wit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or & Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? �9or No Is the cover crop adequate? 6�ior No
Crop(s) being utilized: s s
Does the facility meet SCS min13Ttum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 0 or No
100 Feet from Wells? or#No :4o wells' ? 4d +�
^_c animal waste stocyy.p,.,iled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No LLrGC 7r�
"• AMA
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Bice Line'? Yes or No
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or rather
;irni' a_r min -Wade do ti�ices'% Yes or cO if Yts, Please Explain.
Ic5 LhC r:ic;ility rriaintain adequate waste maxiagemcnr records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)' Yes of No
Additional Comments:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
/-,, t " Z
S i -a lure i
Use Attachments if Needed -
TOTAL. P. e2

Q 010o aM3
' poA 44ek
Raemk to1►111P
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 51-28
Facility Name: J & M Hog Farm
Certified Operator Name:
Benton Johnson
County: Johnston
Operator Number: 18477
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1
N
18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30-day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
1011412016
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
J & M Hog Farm Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 10/1412016
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 1
line m = 273.6 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID: r
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 273.6lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
O. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window
11955
3
small grain overseeed
8.95
50.00
447.5
SEP-APR
11954
1
small grain overseeed
6.18
50.00
309.0
SEP-APR
11954
2
small grain overseeed
2.13
50.00
106.5
SEP-APR
11956
6
small grain overseeed
2.27
50.00
113.5
SEP-APR
11956
7
small grain overseeed
10.34
50.00
517.0
SEP-APR
5673
2A
fescue
4.48
125.00
560.0
SEP-AUG
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 2053.5 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 273.6 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 2053.5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) -1780 tb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
[Application onto existing spray fields will begin as weather and field conditions permit.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

r
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e, line 02 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft:'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
18.0 inches
19.0 inches
1.0 inches
72960 ft2
45478 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 94948 ft3
h. current herd # 28$0 certified herd #1 2880
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 6/15/2016
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
94948 ft'
I 0 ft3
44173 ft3
173438 gallons
1.2g lbs11000 gal.
273.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

Apr 27 12 03:01 p Barwick Agservices 910590074 p.1
ema"'! esvem ❑ Aldaa •seald 0 PPHwwo* *=MId ❑ IZ!A*V JAJ0 luemnje
%Iw'Je�'w
r
e07G :aunyd
aKw � :oy
1
wove �ewb�equa�saowas 6eeq
�[OQ9BS-o 46
oou�-9a� o4s
Rzmz om `uolufl0
90110 Qnio Munn to

ANIMAL WASTE IJTJLIg&IIM PLAN
(Needed only if additional fond has to he leased, etc.)
i• �- "'"�....,_ . hereEy give Lo fiwa rAren �+r�
permission to app y animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on �2io_ acres of my
land for the duration oftirne shown below. The field is] an which waste can be applied are
shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and other trace
elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that
the us a of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer; I • Date:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
It7e,
-- ".26 -13
Term of Agreement: 20J,2_ to 4119a%V4 -a -:Z>
(Mlnlrnum of Ten Years on Cost Shand fremsf
(See Required Specification NO.2)
T 7 SLSH,.J
Z-d
-'-IMN-4c�c;ldw -qnNn-�1
VL0069016
09STLOZ616 EFIVI ZZOZ/LZ/v0
se01rues8y�01,we8 dLO:C0ZLLZjdv

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Benton / S. Johnson / Massengill
J&M Hog Farm Inc
6341 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four.Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA251028
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Benton / S. Johnson / Massengill:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on December 30, 2002, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Benton / S. Johnson / Massengill, authorizing the operation
of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
NPDES General Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC
Number AWS510028 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the J&M Hog Farm Inc, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 2880 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions .;and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality- no later than 120_ days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by_no_later than March 1st of each ,year.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR.122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Pernut, an application for renewal must be filed at Ieast 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right ,to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
CC�;��
i
APR 2 3 2003
DENR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Sincerely,
U
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA251028
Permit File AWS510028
.NDPU Files

February 21, 2003
6341 Strickland Cr ds Road
Fou 27524 F
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
Attn: Mr, Ken Schuster, P.E.
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster;
In regards to your Notice of Violation of February 12, 2003 for my swine farm, J & M Hog
Farm, Inc. (51-28), 1 submit the following information. We were unaware of the suspected
discharge of waste that Mr. John Hunt observed during the February 6, 2003 inspection of our
hog facility. For that reason, we did not notify your office of any discharge. We hope this type
situation does not occur again, but in the event that is does occur, I will notify DWQ immediately
upon discovery of such occurrence. We also will make more frequent observation and closer
inspection of all irrigation events. For future applications we will make certain to place our
irrigation pipes in locations that will minimize the likelihood of any waste being released to any
adjacent wetlands. Furthermore, we are investigating the possibility of burying our irrigation
pipes in this area. There is adequate land on the south side of the wetland area on which we
can apply our waste and we will do a better job of planning and managing our applications so as
to avoid using the field in question.
Regarding the issue of incorrect reporting of dates for irrigation, we will pay closer attention to
our entries. This was an inadvertent mistake. Lime has been applied to the fields in question to
raise the pH to the appropriate level. We have no explanation for the high zinc levels in some
fields, but will continue to closely monitor this issue.
If you need further information regarding this incident, please call me at [phone]
daytime, or [phone] at night. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
/l.
George Massengill
Owner

WA�FR
micoaei r. rasiey, uovemor
O�
QG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`OCR
r
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 12, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL_
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. George Massengill
6341 Strickland Cross Roads
Four Oaks, N.C. 27524
Subject: Notice of Violation
J & M Hog Farm, Inc.
Facility 51-28
Permit No. AWS510028
Dear Mr. Massengill:
On February 6, 2003, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of
the subject facility. Mr. Hunt observed evidence of recent discharges of animal wastes from the above
ground aluminum pipe of the irrigation system, It was apparent that the discharges potentially impacted
waters of the state, but the discharges were not actively flowing at the time of the inspection. This is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-21.1a: No person shall discharge to waters of the state
unless the person shall have applied for and received a permit form the Director and shall have complied
with the conditions prescribed in the permit. Subsequently this is a violation of the animal waste permit.
Additionally Permit Condition 111. 6. g. specifies that any discharge that bypasses a lagoon resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or that poses a serious threat to the environment shall be reported to the
Regional Office within twenty four hours of first knowledge of occurrence.
There were a few additional deficiencies that were noted during the inspection including
Incorrectly reported dates for irrigation events,
High soil pH in some waste application fields, and
relatively high Zinc levels indicated for some of the waste application sites.
Please address these issues to ensure the proper operation and utilization of the subject animal waste
system. If you should have any questions or desire further information please contact John Hunt at 919-
571-4700.
Sincerely;
2,2a
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Curtis Barwick, Coharie Farms, Inc.
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone]
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone]
Customer Service
1-800-623-7748
d��
Rid N I

COHARIE FARMS SLUDGE SURVEY EXEMPTIONS APPROVAL
January 28, 2008
FARM NO.
FARM NAME
Owner Name
COUNTY
REGIONAL
OFFICE
LAGOON ID
EXTENSION
APPROVAL TO 2009
I
I
1
AWS820183
Coharie C-10
D M Faircloth
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#3 only
Yes
2
AWS820237
lCoharie Farms C-1
Coharie hog farm
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
Yes
3
AWS820667
Hall Farm
Coharie hog farm
Sam son
Fayetteville
1
Yes
4
AWS820081
Coharie Farms C-12
Coharie hog farm
SampsonFayetteville
L#2 only
Yes
5
AWS820098
F & B Farms
Graham Freddie
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
Yes
6
AWS820132
Sam Hope farm
Samuel Hope
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
Yes
7
AWS820377
ADJ Nursery #2
ADJ Farms Inc
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
Yes
8
AWS820053
F & B Farms
F & W Farms
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
Yes
9
AWS820188
F & B Farms
James Faircloth
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
Yes
10
AWS820061
Knotty Pine Farm
Michael Herring
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#1 & L#2
Yes
11
AWS820090
Quarter D Farms
Quarter D Farms
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#1 & L#2
Yes
12
AWS820229
P & J Farms
Nelson Porter
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#2 only
Yes
13
AWS820392
Running Branch #2
Joel Parker
Sampson
Fayetteville
I
Yes
14
AWS820606
Goshen Farms
Nelson Waters
Sampson
Fayetteville
L31, L#2, & L#3
Yes
15
AWS820042
John Royal #I-8
John Royal
Sampson
Fayetteville
L31, L#2, & L#3
Yes
16 1111
S510028---
J-&-M-Hog-Farm
J & M Hog Farm
Johnston
Raleigh
1
1 Yes
17
AWS310162
Glade Ridge
Charles Edwards
Duplin
Wilmington
L#1 & L#2
Yes
18
AWS710052
M & D Sow Farm
Mike Hope
Pender
Wilmington
1
Yes
19
AWS960028
Bennie Barwick Farm
Bennie Barwick
Wayne
Washington
1
Yes
20
AWS260059
Collier Farms
David Collier
Cumberland lFayetteville
1
Yes
21
AWS820711
Henry Moore Farm
Henry Moore
Sampson lFayetteville
1
Yes
22
AWS310655
Sloan Brothers
Troy Sloan
Du lin lWilmington
1
Yes
23 IAWS510041
1
Spring Meadow Farms 1
Whitley Stephenson lJohnston
IRaleigh
I
1
Yes
1/29/2008 mdg

Michael F. Easley, Governor
W A T fiRQG
January 28, 2008
Curtis Barwick
Coharie Farms
300 Westover Road
Clinton, North Carolina 28328
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
12-
-- �
d`
I DENR RALEIGN R! GIONAL GFFICI
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Coharie Farms
Animal Waste Management System
Dear Mr. Barwick:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge surveys information on January 16, 2008.
With your results, you requested that the numerous lagoons be exempt from further sludge surveys for the
life of the current permits. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agrees
that a sludge survey is not needed until 2009 for the lagoons that are listed on the attached table.
For these lagoons, the results of the 2009 sludge survey are to be submitted by March 1, 2010.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919)
715-6937.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
`Raleigh=Regio al"O'ffice Aquife Protection S cetion
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Central Files
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal dpportunitylAffirmaWe Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
NRehCarolina
aturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Murphy -Brown LLC
July 17, 2007
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Animal Operations Permitting Unit
Attn: Thomas Slusser
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Dear Mr. Slusser,
PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fm 910-293-6957
1 C' rl��
In response to conversations and email correspondence specific to the Black Creek
Nursery Farm, permit number AWI510027, in Johnston County, I have completed a revised
irrigation layout map and design incorporating the appropriate buffer/setback areas, and have
revised the CAWMP for this facility to match this layout. This information is being submitted in
support of a State Individual Permit Application for Existing Animal Waste Operations sent to
your office in March of this year.
I have included for your review, three copies of the following:
1. Revised irrigation layout map showing appropriate setbacks.
2. Revised Waste Utilization Plan incorporating the acres determined in item (1) above,
and based on the last three years of land application records.
3. Revised BMP checklists.
I did not include copies of the lagoon/system design information as this information has not been
changed, and it is my understanding that the Division has this information on file already.
If additional information is needed, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kraig Westerbeek
Director of Environmental Compliance
Enc.
Cc: MB Files
Joseph Gyamfi, Raleigh Regional Office
Dexter Edwards

o�0F W g19 A r4Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
UJ T_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
� y
-� Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 11 _-_
J&M Hog Farm Inc
J&M Hog Farm Inc - JUN 2 7 2007
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd I
Four Oaks, NC 27524-8114 GFFIGI
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510028
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear J&M Hog Farm Inc:
In accordance with your application received on 15-Dec-06, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J&M Hog Farm Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the J&M Hog Farm Inc, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 2880 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition I11.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pav
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
` NamCarolina
Naturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to MRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS510028

0
_ANINLkL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number W4,1 5�/ `� y
County _TJI-5 (Tr Year 200 6
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) J "1" !'� 1 fO�L i1--4
Operator in Charge for this Facility _ _�`7� _T S"I^ Certification
-
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields Zor Pulls ❑[(please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): ! Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWNT
" y 7
2. Total number of Fields gor Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
. occurred during the year: & Total Acres on which waste was applied 3y, S
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: 12 .E,2 3
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater- sold or given -to other persons and taken
off site during the year L' tons El or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7. Largest and smallest.number of animals by type at this facility at.anyone time during the previous year:
Largest1.1 1,k� II0 Cts
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: 11«6 % r 0 )C;__
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO.BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03
_ - 1E rtid/7 f^
Of r,�. a,

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from . ..
the facility (including the houses, lagoonslstorage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
... _...the.past calendar Year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less -than the volume
for.which the lagoon was designed.
23 Yes L No"
5 Yes ❑ No
®, Yes ❑ No
IN Yes ❑ No
R Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
S. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ® Yes +❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the W Yeses LJ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year."
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during . ' Yes []No
the -past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year -on all. Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person --or persons who manage the system; or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
I�_
p Yermittee Nan* and 1 tie (type or print)
Y 1 ir1 %l, i=: __._ Z
patule�7 uperator in un;
different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2
„2-/ 3-0-%
Date
Z - /3- A 7
Date

9
,f o�0r W A r4 RQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William C. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department oi'Lnviromoent and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 19, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7002 2410 0003 0274 7010
Benton Johnson
J&M Hog Farm, hic.
5110 Strickland CrossroadsRd.
Four Oaks, NC 27524
RE: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Facility # 51-28
Johnston County
Dear Benton Johnson:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your request for a sludge survey
extension on July 25, 2005. Due to the amount of treatment volume available, DWQ agrees that
a sludge survey is not needed until 2007. The results of the 2007 sludge survey are to be
submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due on March 1, 2008,
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
`G2-J,
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File# 51-28
John Hunt, Raleigh Regional Office
N3OnethCaro ina
jl�nt�rrarly
Aquifer Protection section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
[ntemet: http://h2o.enr.sta(c.ne.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Benton / S. Johnson / Massengill
J&M Hog Farm Inc
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear Benton 1 S. Johnson / Massengill:
1 •WA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND, NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
liil;l f - r 11
1 L 0 It
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 51--28
Johnston --County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. iRRI, MR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
SZ,�
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 23, 1998
Benton Johnson / S. Massengill
J&M Hog Farm Inc
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Atm. Benton Johnson
4 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANb NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510028
Additional Information Request
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Benton Johnson:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by January 22, 1999:
Please submit lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any
site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
2. Please submit an Operation and Maintenance Plan.
Please provide a tract/field map that identifies (outlines or highlights), and shows the acreage for, each field
to be used for waste application.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter,
must be submitted on or before January 22, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with ISA N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me aie
083 ion 502.
,
ewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 27, 1999
J&M Hog Farm Inc
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Attn: Benton Johnson
lFalhow'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510028
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Benton Johnson:
In accordance with your application received on September 28, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Benton Johnson & S. Massengill, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the J&M Hog Farm Inc, located in Johnston County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 2880 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510028
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff' i
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502. �, C
N
ua
tS]
I
Sincer
1 Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health_D_epartment
Raleigh-Regi;6 alZOffice'-Water Qua Y_-Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 10, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIP REOUESTED
Benton Johnson
J&M Hog Farm Inc
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Farm Number: 51 - 28
Dear Benton Johnson:
T
4•!W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that J&M Hog Farm Inc, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has six 60 day! to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with apter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 5714700.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely, i1 ,
/�/A. Pr ston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 7, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECYIPT REQUESTED
enton o n�S. Massengill— ---
J&M Hog Farm Inc
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Attn: Benton Johnson
/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510028
Additional Information Request
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear Benton Johnson:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review, A request for additional information was sent on December 31,
1998 and on March 31, 1999 and to date this information has not been received. Please address the following by July 7,
1999:
Please submit lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any
site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
2. Please submit an Operation and Maintenance Plan.
Please provide a tract/field map that identifies (outlines or highlights), and shows the acreage for, each field
to be used for waste application.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter,
must be submitted on or before July 7, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], exiSiZftt-50.
S' cerely, \\ `
`ter
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Benton Johnson
J&M Hog Farm Inc
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: J&M Hog Farm Inc
Facility ID#: 51-28
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687. NW 4,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 ��C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10°/o post -consumer pope

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Coharie Hog Farm
Wednesday, February 1, 2006
Producer: J 8 M Hog Farm Inc.
Farm Name: J & M Finishing 51-28
6341 Stricklands Crossroads Road
Four Oaks,NC 27524
Telephone # : [phone]
Type of Operation : Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals : 2880 hogs design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
3, n
900Z g `
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 9

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year W 6624 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS-
CROP
YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES
LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
NIACRE NIACRE
USED TIME
11955 3
GILEAD_2-6%
BC
5,11
2551
5
2282.25
MAROCT
_
11955 - 3
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
5D D
8.95
447.5
SEP-MAY
.~..~.�
-.TOTALS:
2729.75
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
5435
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0J
4.44
1221
MAR-OCT
5435
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
1
50
0
4.44
222
SEP-MAY
11954
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
6.18
1699.5
MAR-OCT
11954
- 1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
1
50
0
6.181
309
SEP-MAY
4589
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
.7.06
1941.5
MAR-OCT
4589
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
1
50
0
7.06
353
SEP-MAY
11954
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
2.13
585.75
MAR-OCT
11954
- 2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
1
50
0
2.13
106.5
SEP-MAY
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
8.32
2288
MAR-OCT
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
1
50
0
8.32
416
SEP-MAY
5673
2A
GILEAD 2-6%
FC
3.2
160
0
4.48
71 &8
SEP-MAY
11956
6
GILEAD 2-6%
BC
5.1
255
0
2.27
578.85
MAROCT
11956
6
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
50
0
2.271
113.5
SEP-MAY
11956
7
GILEAD 2-6%
BC
5.1
255
0
10.34
2636.7
MAROCT
11956
7
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
50
0
10.341
5171
SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 13706.1
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total requited nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP
BC HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
FC TALL FESCUE -CONTROLLED GRAZED
UNITS
LBS NIUNIT
TONS'
50
AC
50
TONS
50
Page 3of9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1
8.951
2 730
TABLE 2
45.22
13,705
TOTALS: 1 64.171 i6,435
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 6,624
*** BALANCE -9,811
' This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (Inlhr) AIUT (inches)
11954
-t, -2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
0.50
*1
11954
1.2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
*1
11955
-3
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
0.35
*1
1i955
3
GILEAD 2-6%
BC
0.35
*1
11956
-6.-7
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
0.35
*1
11956
6.7
GILEAD 2-6%
BC
0.35
*1
4455
--2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
0.50
*1
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
*1
4589.
-i
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
0.50
*1
4589
t
GOLDSBORO 0-20/6
BC
0.50
*1
5435
-I
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SG
0,50
*1
5435
I
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
*1
Page 4 of 9

5673 2A GILEAD M% 1 FC 1 0,35 "1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. in many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 5 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Acreages based on a wettable acres determination completed on 4-14-04. Producer plans to
sprig tracts 11954 and 11956 in coastal bermuda in the spring of 2006.
Page 6 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1.- Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to 'Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it w611 be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
Page 7 of 9

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 8 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
liquid Systems
Page 9of9

NAME OF FARM: J & M Finishing 51-28
OWNER 1 MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FAIPIA ER� & M g Farm Inc.
SIGNATURE. ''JJ,, — DATE: � — 2 — d
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharie Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
[phone]
SIGNATURE: DATE:
Page 10 of 9

���� •- tt v p��,
i' `���`;•:>r ��..-,1 �`' Lam.,, 4 kx i} 5��/�e
Ro �i $ S: �•� � ` ,,� ��'%�Jii rat �, �'I;r� i' 1 rtk
out
J
1 iy sl
rS� "-,a {
�51y�
Yr
if;
L.mmlitl
i�rp�f�t��.ytR,-,�
Ax
Ila
y 44, '` }�+ r + cam. � ' [ •,'""�t�55 ''' '.i •, {tea.}� r�. �.'� � T � 1 F��. � � ��r-�
a<.
IN
s •-'ram --IL
� s� 4' 7L'�.�r`y + �� .+_ _5 -,`•Zi
74 -
p�y q- '' �- - r 1. "
ITT, .
S�II�:yrr�l[[y �+}y .� ��f-,��:� "�L'..�_,:.5-•�J �qt.�.a_ � I yN tl^
tty,r�l �' �'Yl-i + �r ��i �' . ?Za�,. G•\�~:: �� �.5:1�.��s
= k 4. M' r i �RNP14rr
;ti14 T�� f't4q, q"F�i
,��,k e t}:i_ t;:•
MINI'
�� •� 1
}�
x
9� r

1 W\l 1
� !-FAR
EL
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section -Raleigh Regional Office
Mr. John Hunt
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear John;
Please find enclosed an updated Waste Utilization Plan for J & M Hog Farm (51-28). Fields on
tracts 5435,4589,and 4455 have all been planted in coastal bermuda.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Curtis Barwick
300 Westover Rd./Clinton, N.C. 28328/Prone 910-592-0105

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Coharle Hog Farm
Friday, January 17, 2003
Producer:
Farm Name:
Telephone # :
Type of Operation
J & M Hog Farm Inc,
J & M Finishing 51-28
6341 Stricklands Crossroads Road
Four Oaks,NC 27524
[phone]
Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals : 2880 hogs design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
�*NR RAtEIGH
om`_. w�wr
�FFlrE
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown,
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year, With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 10

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to.apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS-
CROP
YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES
LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
NIACRE NIACRE
USED TIME
11955
3
IGILEAD 2-6%
BH
6
300
0
8.95
2685
MAR-OCT
11955
3
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
5o
0
8.95
447.5
SEP-MAY
TOTALS:
3132.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 10

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE $CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
5435
1
JGOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
4.44
1221
MAR-OCT
11954
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
125
136.25
0
6.18
842.025
MAR-JUN
11954
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
35
140
0
6.18
865.2
APR-SEP 15
11954
+ 1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
60
144
0
6,18
889.92
SEP-APR
4589
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
7.06
1941.5
MAR-OCT
11954
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
125
136.25
0
2.13
290.213
MAR-JUN
11954
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
35
140
0
2.13
298.2
APR-SEP 15
11954
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
60
144
0
2.13
306.72
SEP-APR
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
5.5
275
0
8.32
2288
MAR-OCT
5673
2A
GILEAD 2-6%
FC
3.2
160
0
4.48
716.8
SEP-AUG
11956
+ 6
GILEAD 2-6%
C
75
73.8
0
2.27
167.526
MAR-JUN
11956
6
GILEAD 2-6%
SB
28
112
0
2.27
254.24
APR-SEP 15
11956
6
GILEAD 2-6%
W
40
96
0
2.27
217.92
SEP-APR
11956
7
GILEAD 2-6%
C
75
73.8
0
10.34
763.092
MAR-JUN
11956
7
GILEAD 2-6%
SB
28
112
0
10.34
1158.08
APR-SEP 15
11956
+ 7
GILEAD 2-6°�
W
40
96
0
10.34
992.64
SEP APR
TOTALS: 9690.19
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
LBS NIUNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
FC
TALL FESCUE -CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
W
WHEAT
Page 3 of 10

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS Aw
N USED
TABLE 2 _ 45.22 9,690
TOTALS: 54.17 12,823
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 6,624
***BALANCE -6,199
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the proceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter'
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5,92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (Inlh" AIVIT (inches)
11954
*1, *2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
0.50
*1
11954
*1, *2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
0.50
*1
11954
*1, *2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
0.50
*1
11955
-3
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
0.35
*1
11955
3
GILEAD 2-6%
BH
0.35
*1
11956
*6, *7
GILEAD 2-6%
W
0.35
*1
11956
*6. *7
GILEAD 2-6%
SB
0.35
*1
11956
*6, *7
GILEAD 2-6%
c
0.35
*1
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
*1
4589
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
*1
5435
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
BC
0.50
*1
5673
2A
GILEAD 2-6%
FC
0.35
*1
Page 4 of 10

* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 5 of 10

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This plan is based on a wettable acres determination completed on 4-15-04. Producer has
option to plant a summer annual such as millet on any field and apply at the rate of 100
lbs./nitrogen/acre. Producer also has option to plant a winter annual on any field and apply at
the rate of 75 lbs./nitrogen/acre. These options exclude the coastal bermuda and fescue
fields.
Page 6 of 10

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management; unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where -runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the- outer- perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
Page 7 of 10

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the iandownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limi#ed to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be Kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22, Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 8of10.

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Page 9iof'10

NAME OF FARM: J & M Finishing
OWNER ! MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACIUITY OWNER: J & M HocL Farm Inc.
SIGNATURE: yDIgg�-/ DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharle Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
f.17 1810) 592- 122
SIGNATURE: DATE:
uP/p Q 4P-is v s_
Page 10-of 9

' _ s .. ,�. ��. gam. x.�J.a �: { 1 � ,,.• 1.'}�'
" ! 4{•s' t ,s1 'w .fJ• ydy. - �a/ 1-/J/ '+.,=11>f1i J_'s 'ry
I.1�slt `6r+' � r �i { �y#.7 � � rs� rl -i„'" � -'. 'Y� •TL+"'� r : � �
'r. �,l • �"::t t.:t;ye'' � jSsl� ��.°y." + •� :� ia� �'' �ai:�;, ..r�� . V 1(�� 'i
- i.�/- � ,r�• µr��'� ��� � 1•, r K � ' +[ viir�Cti
•i�a, y
.r siY k.,t�y 1- }k� 'I ,p 1. •<� J( + K.+ C' ••I.�t
��yi'�r r k f� ji'•,`{ J' -
_ •ti. ' 4 - 1. .L .,- L` •, � 1�y-�. ,;'� � i r�[J• �4 t � �„`�'�{a ?S'�� !r w•_ t�iL�/ �y 1 * 21• f4 �" x 8_ � � 1�';,• ] 4�,y . � •.1�1,f F>< 1y!1 '�
� •��.� -mil. ZJ i�-'.�yA J 4 � r '!1 Ir.' i� f'`�•"�L4 O1{f: •1. ii:. � r�t�� _ 4t-` `..7 •_- j �'i. {,.i:'• '
,k•,- 1,1 _4 r,y:��i�'���, , ,� rF � ��� s. r� tslrr��1'(`�H' �y'4 :r t' 'w•:1�,�, J
E 57 �yL`-, j,[{('4+��y •.v�.a T`, 'L�� 4�.st- _ ,� ;+,-F,� ✓il sa�1 '�fi�„'-P// �s.. �,: �.q� s{yF
- iR dSJaY y, a } IJ�+Jy -vii!�L; } • ' r ��- {�ar,'0.hs^,,,�� ','w�,.ii-' Kf�:.j,�
_ •�f i I r
_ -.F al :. .. ��._ ley. •7��' �-'. - -�; ,�+�,�i 'L � .' `�, ' va 'r9 '1 �� , ��,�/, .n��=
NIF
wm
a _ n.i 1�.r .r ¢ {�,� L _ p' �• a �'1'J 4 •kL t.-L, {�.l J i
%_i, �. �� �;.y� ,; ��•Ja �'y'������t :i' .¢ �'a`�i 5. �' t, ti•"y �.�f[ ..'q! 1 I•d � ul
�\ ~ T �C^���:;i 4 _',;,IC 1 . •.. F � � � � .y., r���t�J � AYR�t'� 4y,!! s_.;
.�; `r� � : _ r i'-� �i� A � �_ :r,; f = ! -•r PC �; � % t }�?�{.y,•.`_�,�� Yid
1 1 r
��{�ir 53 }'-• ;7�(,",�y`ti�'`$,` .� j�� �"►►4 •5� a ��,`� �� +.t,a 4 S r .,�E�-{� a ��' `•`; �iysJ `���
� _ s� .1' } l�'bt i• lFr .!� �_ Y4� -.nr �?4���5' ..p' � ' � O�c'�u �.'��� � ,. �1 f�x .�,�:'
JZj71-� `q ' !-+�ei+, r 4 t 's^' y r • i. y- _ H 1���' }i�'�"~�IL�t
Utp
i .;ti�►�.� F •,,1 R� is .. � _',� �� . f. :�„ - ! �, r.,,,._:� . ', �• ��„/ f �`�`�!�;.
1- r -'� .'4• 'YJ �- J .. � � •r , 1. r : � i f 'l �r.1F�}.�•1
i '� � �� ,a . � , �. -�.: � � � �r. x . d s �• Y-'�'";� +-., - ' (� t? , �5-w
+tiff ,
17.
5 'FJt`'
ors � ` � •-*7S* - , ji- _ ,�}a� �a � i }{ .1 CJ - �k '$� •s!4 , � !�74��
ro-
1 �• iii III���,� s L�'�. 4 � ,
.� •�i� _� ki ' 1 , � ' � { , � 'r. , { ���.-,* emu, ; ckF�t,
s•�_'s• r'ti��� ��i-�r •ts, 'T�"s. y�,�� '} 1�y��' .'�� �'t},Jt}';-. :� t#y � 1 e •, i +�
{ ! ;-i { .�3L is 1 71• tya .ter - 1. 4an 1n �{ .J _ . �,., f
• {� 1 ���sw '� � i i 31 '.k ', � § ••.' � -�k�� s��;l�'�t .}�,�- �•:� ,; r'�•,-y-,� 1��Le,�� r�� �
r '{ ..�Y�, Jt.;l} a w•: r'1J 'i', h.:�` N F� / Ji, r•:�. r s .�� �ier 4. r, I 7 „ 14
01 rllm
'j, 1 V!-.f � 11� 4y'.t�• •1a13�,j s} q � � [�' � <.Ff '� . (i•' 1� � � '�1 :�it '!
OVrip t ;5is'w'. ; ^. i ., `' tky 4 I J - s,'• 1 ` 1 't �'a�.0 i
r �1ti 'IF s f 4 '_ b L ►p��r4'�1 4�
ra]ga�'7L'47�1 d f t { M
Y+.
>_ri7��,.'�'_ ►: �� _. i'W�!7e 1�� i � '� � 1

4-/
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sulu cc Cause IIMPS to coalrol Insects Site Specific: Vrarlices� --- ---
Liquid Sysleors
FIIIsb G1111cls Accuillulaliun of solids re, Flash sysic(ll is desig(led and opelaled
- sufficiently to remove accunaliatcci solids iioill
gullcl-s as designed.
fly Remove hridghig of accnn(ulaled solids ;it
discharge
i.:Igmsils .11111 his Cr usted Solids rV Milillmilr lagoolls, sell ling hasills and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to millinlize the
crusting of solids In a depth of no more Ilum 6 -
8..inches over more than 711'% of surl:Ice.
1-xCcs:.iVL: Vegetalivc --- Dccllyilig, vege(illiotl 14 Maintain veg,etalive conlrol along hanks of
( 441will
lagoons and other impouu(Imenls to prevent
accunuliiWnli of decaylllg Vegetative niallcl
thong wales s edge on inyrnund(ncni's perinlcicr.
Dry S}SICllls
l ccJcl:. - - _- - —• Deed Sllillagc fit Design, uperaie and nulintiliu teed syslcMls
hankers and boughs) In minimize Itie
,Ccalnulcliion of decaying wastage.
I
M- Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay inierval daring slJMlnlcr; 15-10 day interval
during; wilder).
Feed Simag;C- --- —�• ACCIIIIIuNHOI1S of fCCd resilhles Itcduce nulisUnc accnuullirtuln ►vilhilc anti ---- ----- ---
alound iminediale perinlcler of lced storage
areas by insuling; drainage mvay titan rile
muVor providing adetilmle conminmcnl
covered hill Iilr hrcwcl's grain and sinlilat high
lloismlc grain proclncls).
Iq' Itispecl Iilr and remove or break lip accimmlated
solids ill Ill(Cl- scrips illinlllll Iecll sioral;e at:
Mecded.
AKIIC - Movellit-I 11. 1996, Page I

Source Cause
fift'll's 10 callfrol Illsecls
Animal 11C)ILNig Altus Accimudalions ofanimal wastes
OY Ellminale low areas that (rap 1110istilic .11mil"
and feed waslage
fences and olfier locations where waste
accumulaies mid disturbance by MORMIS is
W, Mairilaill fence rows alld fifter'stlips molind
animal bolding areas to minimize
acclurill I'll ion s of was(C.S (i.e., illspecl for and
rcimove or break up accomithiled solids as
Illy hl'.111111C I HIL111ilIg • ACCIMILlIalions ofunimul wastes
0 Itenjove spillage on a routine basis (e.g,, 7 - 10
(lay interval daring sumincr; 15-30 day interval
a ded for Imid
during whiler) where matitim is lo,
applicutiori or disposal.
IJ Provide for adequate drainage around inamit e
0 Inspect formid remove or break up acctirmilawd
wasics in filler slirips around slockpiles and
malmle 11,11ldlilig nreas as needed.
For uncle ilifimmilion Contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Depallincla OH-111olmology, Him 7613. Willi Curolhut SmIc I Inimsily,
lUlcigh. NC, 27695-7613.
GcJ dry A"d AeCf el/0-141i a-.Y C le4 .4
AMIC - P.-icitibur 11, 1996, 11;ige 2
cz_5 / 0 6 5' " / /to "

'-'-- '
/.°m..�
|uIll `w°|
u^mx"./uo,v,
- --'--'_-'-- --___---_-
�."om uoa�x;"»uvvouunmv
^ .,|niou|vm|x*ixl |alivx'v,nxxlc'|�v(�xz
�
��~kucm^o�uo�u.)hu�m000Cuxxo|ymc/icxc
and uomvooxuoxc
___
~ `'".,m"""."'".."m.mmx^u ^r Dry m"vx
--_-__---_--''____-- -
^ Y/"|momxx':ovum.}|hmo Pl�'ShNu|Wxxs; '
I u,m/shvam|ovo/dmuo||von- ' ^ ~/~/c�^
o��
W- whighux\o[o`U'|Uom��
'
Rq�Scm|um^oom|mi�h/|.h.m�U"o/z
------'-----'-
Fi ujittemm, vemiiiiii4s,c(i4yitsll
||. i'
^ ^';
---'--�'------ -----�----
ho|o,o/ 111voxnwm,`vo1i'y UoJ\|`k
msc/"Y:�
il Nx�d|oo/ ,xo|ih|io/
m1moio/xoouu;
n|mNi/iwx� '
.
[A F*mle/"r"1;; /*//19
|.Wi,,/r'lI^v/qmmcu=.h"xm J'cvJ^/
cov"m
' - '----------------------'--''
-------
ClIve1j,
mhi|^ md-, a"x filling
F1 [*cod UU lilies ill liCill 1]f lLhh
^ ACxm/^o,hoo'Swxmuwuc/
��~ |m|uU'xv/h/�`wi/|/m"hvUmv,exi|uimn
.,v/vcy^oc:
� h-/` ----'�-���-----'-----------------'---
^ |� o xm illo,y«|u,t ///|;xw [� ^..'x/| '',km|�" |i=, * ".a/ 11111141111 .`f|'k�
|^pi'| *\v|'yinwe]iUix8 Mill om|'dlxm,m^�
' xoi:moo.11"iouuv"|,xmk [J S/m/y|mhow:u
m|ioxkill |.hvwvkxVol
x
' [� |hmuw«n /
'
��.v�
/
~
/
'|
�

'
Co
)
m|cu U| C U
nw�U� m0wu | | ^N
`m/�����
----_-�`�_-_--��---____--_.---'_
[xkwall'|i5cwl-a^point (if yiyu*mx|w/uu/h
"m«:r«/"~
'
' h1oN|"vcl
| ,n"m uo|^',.
' �-- --------�-��r--------------'--------'r-----------'-------
P�^Couuu| |oC000uWo|oy|xoruh/*:;
io`ox�mxu:um,v'm v"ilwu wi'(
�^� voioimom oUi|u(km When poolyi/V|;
[� Nn1mxka|vumim; . x�/�
`
/..
x~ -/"
w ,h,wnl\sio|oUko)mNoivcx
.
^^r ^ilk^^ little ^^~`^ ^^' wind;^^
|
Milli ill ill '
-Mixiomm'ucooxouo' lei |oyrmlil/Cym,slo:;
i
^`moy jio^kCox»rIngmul |ji|/^ |m/I'il(;x;
�
'I--- ---
[) om�*,m'�moCukm� �
-----------------------
'1^----`l
|
'
Val /iJ miu"|`�(`i/'---
[-I mi/--M |vild
:All Id, � ''
^ N�`iox�hUu NUoG�
[l
|
^ Aximo,v/ wkm x*|xyixg
[l Umiom/hicxmmuo[*|���
'
/
1-1|\.w*/hh'kq�o� hU i �|
|
�
x|^ �| /. `". /~-----�ai-------------�----'-'-
^.� ./ .° .
';
--------�—
-- -- '
^ N/hi'`S °|`hu |Ulil`C;
- Aximti"ow|*ocm|vy|xU
[-| Kuxov,`cxh,fSolids nX"lajy
/
N| | |
�'i '� --�''---------'---
-----------''----------' - ---�
SoUi/�jxliw"[,\vnyb|*��,�
`-'
*^x.| / ""/�^ '
^ v"i^/ik xos "ois,ioxx
[i vuh /cd'h^| moomx /"vv
[� |mvc^|'i`knim|uNi�ivxs.v,v��xx,
|
�
` ^ `, , ^ .
"' . | " ""."
v |^�ik �� � �� -�-|i| '-----
^ o xo,u/ u vo w / ,
.`^�.
-- --- ----'-----
[l S..0 h�,,/i.","Hm''k�^hp` /
- �
�
.h/i"»
[) Soil io'my.vill iw nid/h/ 'N his.;
Fl :|""m| ill U'io |xy", /ill`jI|,|'yh'C�
D y"/"w` N^i^GA A o/Nxi",, o/v:i.hJill :
|� � |
| i
- - -----�- - -- ---------�
-
------�s��_^/�/�u��_�"^,p�
' u^" //..."./.. H. '.'.^. '^*: -1

AddlI111111.11 111hillwilillit Avitibiblu Finm
Swink: Holsill" H-111.1j!"Ilwill 0-101) 1611AIN-111 Pachd NCSIJ, 0111111Y I"?,jensilin Cclibil
V1.1.111, Holl I,ijljsl I'tilcmiM I him Somucs and I(cmedics ; 1,'IIAI-' Fact Shud IIR SI I - BAj-'
*;%vwIc hil,1111 11.111 1'.11 1111Y 1-1,mllcu NlimillculcoL. Vil Itc0puge - Lalmon Tmilincid ; I-'IIAI-.' IIfl-116 HCS I I - IIAI.
*ltvillt: 1,114-611.11oll 1 ,11 thly 10,111111l; IJjj(ItjII4)()f I"Illsil - 1,11t;fllm 'I'malment I-IIAJ; 129-811 MCS I I - IIAF
I agmell I aeld lAmolgemcm Ioj Liveslad, Himme Ticalmeni and Sloiage ; LAW; 103-111 'S I I - 11AI.,
"111111 mi-011 111 1, ImIm 4: alid Wiv.w-xvatui Alsplic-aiion Equipmcm ; FAA 1; Fiwl Shco N CS I I - IJAJ-
Itijill ;Ivillk: 1111iIdIilsI;!4 ; 11111-33 Hif .,;I I - ;,wilju I;Xluilsilm
P1111,1411% , HITC t�I-Amlilj
11-1 1.1-111-ij;PILI, 11,104 ; il 11,11111ij I"mill lilt; Saville Hill Task Fulce H( , 'SIJ AIpj Commimiciiihms
llkl�.1111.c ( 'Fill, i.tlj" lit Millmit; Himagi,111CIII: Otlibis awl flies : IT0101. 1495 Plocculfiligs 1:141141a Coopcialive

N-Iortality N.Management -Nle*hods
which r;ie:hod(s) are being imoiementea)
Eurial three fee: beneath the surface of the Q_ound within _.f hour_ after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 3,00 feet from any fiowina
stream or public body or water.
7.,( Rendering at a renderins plant li=nsed under G.S. I06-163.7
•' Complete incineration
n In the care of dead poultry only. piacing id a disposal pit or a size and design
approved by the Department of A zricuZture
�.' Any method which.in the professional opinion of the State zterinarian would
make possible the sa.ivaQe of pan of a dead animal's value without endan2a ins
human or animal health. (Written approval of tine State Veterinarian must be
attached)

0
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
CWQ 919- 571-4700
hV GZNCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-989-5050
SnC3 919- 989-5381
NRCS 919- 989-5381
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running of
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees -at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
i. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possihle solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b . Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable _ _ __ .
C. Stop all flows co the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
S. `flake sure no surface waver is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field --actions
include:
a. immediately stop waste application.
ri. Create c temporary diversion to C.._ri:.'..,._n waste.
C .-nccracraLe Waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and e__minaze = e _ ,ascn (_; p_.a _
caused the runcfa.
S. E al,,ac- the appli..a__cn razes Or the fields
-:mere runoff ccc.._ _ er .
,ea{age from F e "avast_ pipas amd
_: c_ de:

All
11
0
�7+
to
>f {J U
I j
n1
rd
UI
U)
1l
(1)
010
0) .IJ
.I1 U t!1
Id
N
Id
4 1
ql
1.
f✓
R,
+)
(1)RI
C)
U
f
Ul
11
I r
r
0)
{J
4-I I
U) ,Y.
it) r -. I C
rf
+ 1 1
to
I
in
1�1
O V1
U
r-I [) .1) U
[d U �I V
A
i f
[)
c:
IJ
r
r r ,Il q)
,
tad
—1 ,�
In
o
,,-t
,'
u
I
> r
, t c 1 • .
, 1
In
LJ'
i N
ro
[j
�I
qJ
r
IU
1, ., I I; n,
I,
11
`{
O
�
�{
rI
O
RI
N.
f; I.; U VI
'J-t
[�• •[j
;J
[Il
•. I
.,:
.1 It
i l •1 r f : ',
111
v t
;A
to
{J
O tT
_r,+
[.1 J
nl go Id
q
fd
in C;
i I rll
}'
11
� b
d-1 04
tP in (1)F'
q)
1
U
trM
I
rl,
r I
0
fd
1V rl
(t)
}" N !' CJ
a)
-1-1 •LI
I I:
,t:
W
aJ
3
U [i
I ,-I )i .1J
13
to (1)
N
s:
I t: lf1
In
V)
N
O
44 ,-I
f
O to
3 V IJ
0 J:: a) U
O
b
,3 to
111
(1)
>
[t• .-f
'>,
t!
} I
RI'
11
O 4J
V
1.1 -lJ A
N N
,
O
to
1) .'.,
(U
N
i)'
Ul
1 r ,
f 1 t1• t
} I
0
d
to to
[]
r 1 a
-
�; p,
jI 1.4 (V
J r 1 t"
tl
q
U r I
rti N
1
Rr
Li IJ
rll
1:
iI
:'I
,II 11)
iIt
1J
u r
-C1
N
f), al
J
nJ
,d
r_1
n1
VI
U .O
U
i1
Dt •`0
I p.,
1I-1 !d V
>1 • v LI,
rt
1 I
7 UI
aJ
tl IJ
CJ
to
m
O N
O
dl a1
Tj
Q •[1 1-1 0i ([I
ri
U) Id
U1
I • }4 0
0) ❑, }7.
P
1:
...I
_1
I
a)
.I
1
+[j U1
aJ
f; -,A IA
•r-i
;;
to
U1
--1 u1
t-
V1
—1
.1J
V
f
O,
r) O
fn LL
1 t r 4
O A
1 i to O 1-1IaI
(V to riJ '[j
VI
��,
}', r,
to a1 (11
♦~ S" J"
(1)
Up
U
(1)
1[ _! 1 t
V
'Jf
V1
U
14
RI no •C C
Do .
U) (n
04
tl
I
V) U) G >~
rd U
U
Id t.i .IJ
01
A
4 -t
V
In _ 1 (1)
tt.
rI
-I
9 C -r-I
1.J `4
0
O
—1 to
r-1 1.f
—1 (1)0 to
n1 ro O4•-I
(U
Al
�
S; r
710
111
IU lU
1:
lu
1 I
0
w
111
.0
Q. O U) U)
0 rd
V1
w (V
U r *f Ul N
aJ
U
'_, > a
1
;J
11)
C)'
I : nl (1
.. I I I t [.:
I
+It
to
11:3
O
-1
; r
`J IJ ~1
to3
-
-IJ r1) +d
to
1.4 h•
f0
I
+r1 (it, I
ql .V V O
rU
V)••
N
O
ll) f: 01 I
'`,11-1
+11
0) O .
tj
! t al •1_',
1.1
qJ
- 'Ll
I t t . ,;
W
-u
U Ln tta
td —1
fd C
A tT O
r I
r 1 1n
11 Id rd
N to CJ
0
,-I- I N
QI r-I
td • 4
N
,r
N r-f 14
v
(1)
1J
0, .-1
t) I r-1
a1
1.4
to
3-I
rd
:x
I .t".-
I.+ U
Ili
I
i�
Id
U }a �4 *4
N rd
Rf -
r to
(A , U R, N N
11
jJ rl
C
14 -1 ••-I
•1
a)
N to
1
fit 'I.,
,
O
l i
1
ul
(1) i I �j 1
1.1 I V1
in
J
o 4) U
U)
• a) O '(1 • -1
0)
U1 ql
Q.--, JD.I
IJ
IJ
q1
U. N
1-1
+f.f
14
, 1d
I
d 1
Fl U) Id
C
lu ­1 ) td n1 ••-1 A
4­1
rt1 .0
a)
10 in
::1
rd
• A
n 1 I
U+
94 [n
Id --1
0 O lU UI ••-I
Y.
:�: (d v.
LP
f4 U)
n-f
z
-la
I-t
a
Poo. N 01-r1
to
w
O .C: 1-1 .r, N to
a)
V.
id
o a)
11)
O,.r;
1-1
(1)
t)+
V
0 0 _{ O
r--) Or
N V) —4
t I.IJ
tlf .{J y N V1
N • 1 O
r
N I;
I'• to
(1)
U
U
Of
Ill
;A
aJ 1J ,tl V
t/I
V a)
t I. 1 A
•-f �J
to 44 kI •r-I fV C; O
N
11 x _I
N
- C t-I
1n
V
a
lU :J
}-11
U, IIr I,
fd
(n : U7
U) flH
N -11
C) 0.1
r-1 I-1 o ? :I, tJ [),
.0
.IJ O 41
'[3
UI 4_1
14 •Ll
of
I),
i
Ill
'�. U1 V)
1.41 to
—1 U)
t11 •- I
Ili
.r;
I.1
I : • I I
al
N
R1
a1
ro •14 V)
fU
to
d R, 1-I
-'r
I 'd N
IJ ::I
I.1
[U
-z
d+
► 7
to
to ti U 't1
N
•rA O
a 4-11 04
Id
a U
to ID
In to
­4 Q. C
Q
1=,
-I -r1 0
to 0
::j
I•I
'1-1 0
U
III
:.1
( I
a)
Jj
�
0
n
(1
l)
ri
Id J1
U
'rJ N
11-4
11+
.i::
tl
r1,
N
r•1

the incident frcm _zero ? agave, z::e exac= �ocaL_cn
of r-It o =act;_ _J, the _ccaz,^r. c, c.irecz_cr. a�
TICtJ =ment C = ne sm J i ° , Jea z.^_nr and 'Wind Cc r.d- r-ns .
The CO?'- "''Je ",measures `aC have yeen ULnder Ca Cen,
and ser-Ousress O- z :e S_CuaC�On.
Cr a?' z=r5 SI:.=ace 'Haz :; s.
call licca1 -EMS Phone nuaice- S19-989- 5C50.
C . lnstrucz. S to Conz acz ? cca 1 ^ea l.:I !_,enar ♦:Item .
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989-5380, kcal SWCO
off ice phone number 919-989-53,81, and local MRCS
office fcr advice/technical assistance phone number
g Zg- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 91? or the Sheriff's
Depart=ent and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
G: contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
or problem to minimize off -site damage.
a . Coney aczcrs Vane :I --
,=. Contractors Address: ��+Sswc ="'s Y.C� :_4'74
c. Contractors Phone:`
syy-6ss/
a: Contact the technical saeC_alist Who cert_fzed the
lagoon (NRCS, Ccnsulting Emgineer, etc.)
a. Name
b. Phone: [phone]
7: implement procedures as advised by DWO and technical
assistance agenciesto rectify the damage, repairs the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keen
problems with release off wastes =rem happening acaim.

' WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 51-- 2F
Coharie Hog Farm
Friday, January 17, 2003
Producer: J a M Nog Farm Inc.
Farm Name; J & M Finishing
5110 Stricklands Crossroads Road
FourOaks,NC 27524
Telephone # : [phone] A'O&D.,
"rg8 Type of Operation : Feeder to Finish swine �l�flll�
Number of Animals: 2880 hogs design capacity -
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. Thi, waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should '.be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 9

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs X 1.9 tons wastelhogslyear = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIEL❑ SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE N/ACRE USED TIME
4340
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
130
143
0J
4.32
617.76
MAR-JUN
4340
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
38
152
0
4.32
656.64
APR-SEP 15
4340
1
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
65
156
0
4.32
673.92
SEP-APR
4340
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
130
143
0
1,89
270.27
MAR-JUN
4340
r 2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
38
152
0
1.89
287.28
APR-SEP 15
4340
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
65
156
0
1.89
294.84
SEP-APR
4340
3
GILEAD 2-6%
BH
6
300
0
7.17
2151
MAR-OCT
4340
3
GILEAD 2-6%
SG
1
50
0
7.17
358.5
SEP-MAY
4340
6
GILEAD 2-6%
C
100
105
0
3
315
MAR-JUN
4340
* 6
IGILEAD 2-6%
SB
28
112
0
3
336
APR-SEP 15
4340
* 6
GILEAD 2-6%
W
50
120
0
3
360
SEP-APR
4340
8
GILEAD 2-6%
C
100
105
0
8.55
897.75
MAR-JUN
4340
8
GILEAD 2-6%
SB
28
112
0
8.55
957.E
APR-SEP 15
4340
* 8
GILEAD 2-6%
W
50
120
0
8.55
1026
SEP-APR
TOTALS: 6856.03
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONGTERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LEIS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE N/ACRE NIACRE USED TIME
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
130
136.5
0
7.61
1038.77
MAR-JUN
4455
2
GOLDSBORO 0-21/o
I SB
38
152
0
7.61
1156.72
APR-SEP 15
4455
* 2
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
65
156
0
7.61
1187.16
SEP-APR
5673
2A IGILEAD
2-6%
FP
31
150
0
3.78
5671
SEP-MAY
5435
* 3
JGOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
130
136.5
0
2.58
352.17
MAR-JUN
5435
* 3
JGOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
38
1521
0
2.58
392.16
APR-SEP 15
5435
* 3
IGOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
65
156
0
2.58
402.48
SEP-APR
4589
5
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
130
135.5
0
4.71
642.915
MAR-JUN
4589
5
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
38
152
0
4.71
715.92
APR-SEP 15
4589
5
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
651
156
0
4.71
734.76
SEP-APR
TOTALS: 3878.53
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LEIS NIUNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
W
WHEAT
Page 3 of 9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 24.931 5,856
TABLE2 1$.6$ 3,879
TOTALS: 43.61 9,735
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 6,624
' BALANCE -3,111
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (in/hr) AMT (inches)
4340
'1,'?
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
0.50
'1
4340
#6. "g
GILEAD 2-6%
C
0.35
'1
4340
'6, •8
GILEAD 2.6%
SB
0.35
'1
4340
-3
GILEAD 2.6%
SG
0.35
'1
1j4340
'6,'8
GILEAD 2-6%
1/V
0.35
'1
.4340
GOLDSBORO 0-2°i°
C
0.50
"1
4340
3
GILEAD 2.6%
BH
0.35
"1
14340
•i,'?
GOLDSBORO0-2%
SB
0.50
'1
'4455
'-'
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
0.50
'1 I
%4455
'? JGOLDSBORO 0-2%
j W
0.50
'1
4455
+7 IGOLDSBORO 0-2% C
0,50
"1
4589
`5 !GOLDSBORO 0-20/6 I C
f 0,50
'1
Page 4 of 9

4589
*5
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
0.50
'1
4589
*5
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
0.50
*1
5435
*3
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
C
0.50
"1
5435
*3
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
SB
0.50
'1
5435
*3
GOLDSBORO 0-2%
W
0.50
'1
5673
2A
GILEAD 2-6%
FP
0.35
*1
w This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the croo is not over applied, In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 5 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This plan is based on a wettable acres determination completed on 7-22-99. Producer has
option to plant a summer annual such as millet on any field and apply at the rate of 100
lbs.lnitrogenlacre. Producer also has option to plant a winter annual on any field and apply at
the rate of 100 Ibs,fnitrogenlacre. These options exclude the coastal Bermuda and fescue
fields.
Page 6 of 9
IV

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment fife for guidance.)
'7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsita or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil,
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from anv residential prooerty boundary
Page 7 of 9

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters, (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volu~ne fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element, Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 8 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Page 9 of 9

NAME OF FARM: J & M Finishing
OWNER ! MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: J & M Hog Farm Inc.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharie Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
10) 592- 122
SIGNATURE: DATE: 1'11-7
Page 10 of 9

IV
Lots
Iw 'u
H1
'1:��' .i A` \:::..� .4 � t•�� • •t� � s 7; a+•.e t ��12~. +5., i��.� ,f �•��f., '� r f - �
a s ' µ .3 , yi4 , Y '� r .!.'.✓
.-:i.�1 ram•.. �� ' ���T ;�• ��. ' u ', u''� k' �,S •'� �11 '1 �"t3
' yt onY 1
1�41�4l�
-�•;� y .{,� x�i a. � i ?C R R�1. S`�T�•'}�)l,� rt �:t �ti� j•L1�•�f•l��r '.�
"Yr�l`��'{y.; 4� .t;'�`s��v����!:/si'/��1 t;�'7•,Sr°i:��. .��d I1}��.P���el
" • i it' ram- - '� r----.--• -_- �,^_» I ' �1 1'•.�lµ 7�
9Jr'�. 4'lie�' , �' i-, s r � � 1 ML i Ml r,a r11 •r �L; w. *'
� if_"i Soh I,. _, I {{• I,:- 1•- f � .
"*�^ate• J i'J� � 'i• h��; !{1>' � '� l� {
•-`^��'Ur5'�af'•r �' "'� t {37° ,'s' �1'Yy �.�l�a� �'��;�:��a�•�r'N
AL
I' `'1:�. `•„•
IN. %/ 1 ..�`'�-YJ.4 ✓ i=1-',t
rIL++
f . '
libj
h'S • r.� _ XJL
AUM : vl sf• df. r f4fu.,'. 1 .S vir� f.

Insect Control Checklist forAnimal Operations
a
tinnlcc Cause IIMPS to Coulrol II15CCIS Silt Spccilic Practices
I ull 6wicrs
I.agoolls alld Pils
-I:I,CtS,JvC Vcgclalive
r;rowlb
ACCnmulation of solids
Crusted Solids
Liquid Systems
hlnsb system is designed and operaled —
sul'ticiently In remove accuilluialed solids from
hullers as designed.
P" Remove bridging of acctuulllated solids ill
discharge
1q Maill milt lagonns, sellling basins and bits allele
pest breeding is apparent la minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than fi -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
• Dwlying vegetation M, Maintain vebelative control along banks Ill
lagoons and other impouodnlcols to prevenl
aceimmlallon oI ilecayiog vegetative mailer
Moog tvalers edge oil inipoundmcnl'S periltlelcr.
Dry Systems
i e� ier:0 I•Cerl Spillage E7 Design, operale mnrl Ioainlain feed systems (c.g.,
bunkers and (roughs) to minimize the
/.Ilccrnuolaliuil of decaying wnslagc.
ri Clcan ulI spillage on a iowine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
(I;iy illlemil during sllrmne, 15-30 clay iiilcrval
during winder).
Feud Slnr;rl;r - - �--• Accumidalions of fced residues fy Reduce moisture accinrellatioir wilhin mull--
aiuund immelli;1le perinlclei of fced sloral;c
areas by iosuriol; di;linagc away froirl silc
and/or providing adeelwitc cont;iinnlum
covered bin lbr brewel•s grain and similar high
Iuoislure grain pro(1nCls).
IA Inspect fur and remove or break isp accimoll;ded
solids in filler strips ;humid feed storage as
needcd.
AA1ll - Novccnlbcl 11. 1996. I'.Ige

Snnrcc Cause
IINIPS to Control 1155CCIS Sile SlIcuilic I'l aclice.-i
Animal —I i(_4ding A icas • Acemnuilatiouls of allimal wastes
f3j,
r"Jilihiliale low ag-C'Is that lull) 1110ishure aloull"
and reed waslage
fences mid oilier localioris where %vasue
aectumidales and disImbarice by animals is
I, Maintain fence rows and fiber strips ajouind
animal
rial holding areas to minimize
acciinjiulafions of wastes (i.e., inspect For and
remove or break tip accirimilaled solids as
Di y h L111111 C I Insidling 0 ACCLUIIILIIUfiOHS Of'.111iolill W.00S
rl
Remove spillage on a rouiline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay imlerval dtiring sunnier; 15-30 clay interval
during whiner) W11CI-C 111.11111te is loaded for land
applicalion or disposal.
f]
Provide For adeqiva(c drainage arovind mane
stockpiles.
171
Inspect fur and remove or break up accimmlated
wastes in filler strips aromid slockpilus and
111:111tile handling amus as Pleeded,
For 111(fle i11101111alioll Colilad Ille Cooperative Extension Set -vice, Depalluncill orlilitolliology, Box 76 13, North Carolina Slale I Inimsily,
[Ulcigh, VIC. '17695-76 11
.4kyd Ace e i1ek- a) C`e.ri
ANII( 1.),-cwher 11, 1996, Page 2
el__5 10.5 5 f �� /'111

-'-
_ ___-Gm,u
U/kxx��o k�|o�x,b"0.|m' S|("�y"iU" y.ar|i^/
w^o/kx|ho0-C"�
/4~-ftummommoil led \Wwmmmgu,icmymwic',�
[},-Y111od]o'k»xo11 and ,omxmx s,osv '
'' --------------- -------
^ |)myxmmm/u'cov"m\mlxmh
---------------------- ' -' —'' 9�
F-k^U linnisv
.
-�'��
m vvo*ws\000m\owx5k*o|Ih»vz�
'- '---�-�--�� - ------
A--|1c/|co m high o^)o[�o|N 0vou�
�
�
QAr Io|umum/o hoiNx(. hmo Um`u; _
_--_�_-_----__��'
Fj 11u|oU"0/vcu/ilwioo [x
-----__--__----'__'_ _--'�__---__�--
,` |ioymommmn`nvvv//Iky0vsk.|`ii/u1^vU:.
miuo|/io| /kuvo|'wi/i/w
'" u:/il*;
(] wxxi|ui/v'
laovmilxu:/icc'.
oi, m"w,o.n/ �
_ -- _.......
-'-_
v|^wo\m°czoC"xqno|u/ii^ob�
�
.
[/ Fccdulu,v:u-,
J"U=//|.=o,y^mxu"m�u*kc/|., )
x `/ /i [ | ||----'--------'-----------
---------- --------'-'-� -' - -'- �
w|/i|x |u,L, v/^ filling
FI F*xud fill fillin; III 1wal b1moill ctl,lilllh; %vi | �
-
wnx�i,|mxvuxu AIM
-`'-- ---'-------�
^ A|j/NxmJmh`6wv tv"m/C/
-'-^�-------'--^'------- i
11.^i"''`|�'o.m '
``vwcyvoc,
xohuim�"[/1:cyz|u||n/41 f`o
|^y*| whU'Jill ill x
���--' --�- -'- ---------'—' �'+^`--'----
x ./ oo. un°o|.ux [l Svv/y/m/t"/v.,,
m|ioo^o/�mnm.|vwo
� i/ ,ij' [Ill,
- ---- �--�------ ' ' ` ------
|� n I. */ /:m^�/^wv^x [l |hm,o"*x /
' ' .� � .
'

|./iw*im.,|vi"||c.
mu/1,:`
u.^..n./."| ". |'^ix
'o|^`'
,;'x|u.:!'^.m,"|"...
('ooSC 11111VIIIIS (o mild^ic 011^r S|I,S "cUic |`/.4icc/
~ A8oui'x/ Jo,ill U wits u^w|c/
[1 |�x|xodJiSt. hovv:yoiiU "[yi|ms mx|cmcw|/
,w.v,yuo,I;
cm���----------
oc
----�-'r~-----------'-------- '
�r �\/qux hgxm |hyxduq`ilci/y"
'
^ |ho|,,gk^| mixing;
|o&mmuhimi/ |xoco|xm,"
"~/-'io}oxxomo|v:xalmm'v"hm/,m|io;
/vr wiximmox�i|�kww|/�'pm�yv/C�
[l tvIu1wx^a|xnmim'
.
l,b`|ogko| uNx)»:x
_
^ |Uuh |./ouxv oKiwmx�
--__�_------____---.__'_---_-___'--'
m miG/xvw/ '|'y'|jJyu wiU/ |ixl,�o/Ill) wio'|;
^ \Vill, | ill ih '
L� Wixi*mo /cuwmxxx|*| oycm�ix� y/uoo/�
.��
*� om`|`h^xkuo:*hg."m|i'yti/|sill |tcc;
[l |\xx|. hmx uzmx| moC ' h:vm/
~~---'---�-__-__--_-_--'- -_
[l Ummm.vmi'||"vx| |^m|io6; '
^ k1i^ixg w|`i|c N|iog..
[l laot cvvu/s;
^ �Uiwioxv1m�uo|"yio�
[1 Uod»sill f/ccwo\,ofm|i'b. .
O |\"vi"o hi»|oxi | illhIllivcs Ill oxithills
i' n |' ` -|��i-��---�`— --��----------------
---'--- —' -�
�»'|�
^ Axiw/i.w "N/:",m|./riou
1-1 kmmw:uxUu|u,|i/hw-Cvh/'|r
^ 6°|m,`ypoJl`x'
[l S'`i|hL'j"*iox'`[`|»v'�k^hc �--- ----�------'
Go�
[l Wil`h /",iehm| momoc 6mo qvuml:/ u||* o,(.;
^| v N ' i -� ' '
' // ' u:, w`ui.vu �/i�
'- ' --'---' ---���---� ------ -
[) ;oi| iojc*w` "|. lilt / lilt |f!u '
/l /4/h i/xxx|mill ioo wi/|/i" 1x
/
[l |)".co |,ioloCi"^| mNi/i°u .^oxi.km/
---- — -------------
mm/"/oxuu`.�`
[| |'"vle'r local im//u.`ovu"Ill "/.|iq».m| yi|,
;ta�"ill x . y * . t (.".m, -------�---------------' - '
u* it 1/..' .^/^ . / / r'U., ,^/"� -|

114 A I I III 11111myel
1 1 Pool ly 111i
A Jlv;kjIijIIIC I)IIIII
-------- - — - — - — --
(: Hc- --
SkVi4w -111m1� III 0,20fli 11:111AIMP PatIct HCSI J, Comily Fh1cmion Ccoh;l
11-111 1". Iltlk I'ilICI11611 ( 141111' SIMICCS Mid RCIILCIhL;S : FAIAC hicl Shco 1,1 ( 'S I I - I I A I
1'141.Ijtl 11.111 J-.Ll ljjjy 1.1,11mic NI;Lwq-,L:IlICI%1: Pit UCCIliligt; - IJII�tIOJI TICUIlliCilil -. 111AI-i I 19-Bg 1-IC"A I - 11AF
HCS1 I - I ) A I
I Im IJvL;!i(1)Ck Mamite TIcammit awl Simage -1 1:11A1i 101-81 N ( S I I - I I A I
'.11fl11mi-jol o( 11 LHIM C 01111 Miickviiici A plificalinn Filisipinc.al ; FAIA 1; Fisc[ SlIcci 1,IC-S I I IJA 1;
* 13 1111 4 s I I I I I I-, I I, II I I :. II I. r 11 tv i III: IIII i I, I it I I % ; (`III-T1 1-1 ( , I - I I S %v i it C I.Klc I I S I I
hivilt-w1willad hlij;wllk ; HITC NhImal HC l'ojl, j'mdm:L:j-; Msm:
)I it]. )I 1r. l it 1, 1.111 aj;l 111-, ( 1, Im, I it 11:11411 ( It (1111 tht; Swilic ( Mm TwA, I ;mce 1'ICS1 I A Ii i i 'i)numm iciiijow;
Anim.11 14.11illic kkIlIaL '111CIII: ( )d(li!i 111111 Hic!i " PIM HO, 1995 CIIIII'Cicilix 111ticcedillp Hmid;l Coollcliltivo FxwFisilm
A f, I I H , II..•..I.II I I I, I J%q:, "

Ni lortality Management ylethods
(check; which method(s) are being imnienented)
Burial three fee: beneath the surface of the ground within 22' hours after
knowledge of the de_th. The burial must be at least -3300 feet from any riowirI2
stream or public body of water.
Rende:inz at a renderinz plant licensed under G.S. 106-16 .7
' Cornolete incineration
In the case of dead poultry oniy. piacing iri a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Departrneat of Agriculture
r! Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

L
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHDNE NUMEcpS
DWQ 9 9-- 571-4700
EMERGENCY :MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 91c_989-5050
S'*vCD 919— 989--5381
ZURCS 919-- 989-5381
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface rlazers
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.'
You should make every effort to ensure that this Goes not
happen. This plan should be pasted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facil tv. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be passible. suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -passible solutions are:
a. Add sail a berm tc increase elevation of dam.
^. Pump castes to =_e ds at an acceptable _ale.
C. Stou all flows cc =he lagoon immediazely.
d. Cal- a pumping ccntracfor.
S. Make sure nc surface ;eater is entering Lagoon.
3: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include.
a. immediately szcp "tias%e application.
l . Create a temccrary diversion to `.onvain wasze.
C. _nconcra a .Vas o `c reduce _ anal= .
d. Evaluate and e__mina za ..: e _ e_scn r s; z._a
Caused he runcf .
S. Evaluate zne aC: __..az_cn ----ties =:._ to ffaL±s
where ru cf f cCti.ur ad .
Leakage __=m _he :.7as a pipes and s -nklar- -a -_...-
A c l' d e.
E. _ ter.+ racycLs.

,j
14
V
tll
L71
La,
❑1
11
I
«J
>•I
I
U
I �
of
rl1
n
J
U
[!l
Inr,
,,,
'r ,
]✓
r
))1
1�
tU
A
)
rll
[�
V)
rl:f
44
it) .`1
it)L
I
{�
O In
U
,-1
{)
.11
O
1-t
I I
(7
S I
1
Id
{.)
-r I
V
r�+l 111 111
,? I 1 l) • •
I
Itl
r1
IA
ZP
n)
rl)
I
.0
r71
V
4-I
`,
}
U
I
11
I I• 1 I: 11l
11
ul
.tii
r • 'zf
1
;1
rl1
(f!
• • I
-.1
tU
.f ;
', r 1 'I,f
1 , 'I r 1 : ' I
U1
•r i
V)
I
O
{.)
rri
nl
0
(d
to r,
tJt ! 1
I-1 1),
tp
in
({)
F
qj
11 rU
C:
rfl
1
i I 1 }
III
Ill
nj
-Ij
rd -rA
r-!
tlf
1"
0)
.["
U
Ua
V1
O
r:
3
U
4j
O
;? N
LU
r• •-{
)I
)1
E s) {1,,{
tlj,
O W
Id
U
1.1
r:
nl
U
Al
0
r[7
'> 1
•>, rt1
. t ) ,
(n Ln
))
•-E
.1j
r(j
•U
n) nJ
V
1) '• [
(ll
U,
Ell
11 L". 111
d)�,
U ,-1
Rf nl
-I
P,
1i i�
(U C
Ell
_1
[:;
I17
Ill
`
��4
O a
.jJ
; �.
•L]
Q, 4)
rll
'r.l
IJ
S I ql .s:
111 rrr
1
:1
[1-t
[L{
:
U
U
I
i i
i
nJ
(-) IJ
{)
to
l 1
[
nl
d
Ti
Q
'iy
•- 1 n)
Id
r{
u)
to to
ul
r • 1-1 V
(U Q, t 1,
r :
N,
S
r.P, -0,
��
-4
11
rd V!
r) {J
Ul
l r •�
Cf
t
I(1
-•-I
O r {
a
A,
rd
Of
Ln
[ : I : 1 of
[_
U
P,
U) DA
,7 Ja
(1)
V) Ili
'U
to
T,
! c:
rd a)W
S" j"
(1)
>
In
U
a!
ul
b
N.
-C,' (~
Pr 1 In
(n
04
1
•.-I
u)
ul
rd U
-1:
U
N .W .P
n)
r-E
. -1
ts7
4 �I
-I
U
tll r1 .[ :
V] .1
l
•r-1
d (~
-.-I i4
4 O
O
—1 (n
.-I }-I
�
tt7
—1
fU
0)0
�,-•-!
lu
41
fi;
�
�
:j
In
•d
tll
'>
d
T?, O
(n 3
tll U)
U
f 1
>, u)
to
-C;
t}
lU N
r
t;
1,1
:�
u1
Q1
U+
[: 111 t)
I s
I
U1
c7
O
-11
N IJ
JUI
U O
N
41 rd
4�
r{
[d 3
, .>
.I-r n3 W
IV
I r
r•
Id
I 1 1
yl n1 'I I I
nl
rd
1� r-I )-J
..
rd Q)
f-I
'`, 4-1
'd
It n) .[;
It
[I)
44
13
U til
4a Id
•-1
-
A � O
,—I
,- I to
rd
rd
rd 0
rd
;z
O
f l .C:
q1
nl .-I
r •
Lr
�, sIl
r11
.1 1 sU S I
U
'1.1.,.{
(U P4r-1
rd -14
,tJ
(1)
r-1 fa
n) >,
.l-)
O
Pa �-I
0 .-r ,-1
nl
�4
{!]
1-I
,l1
:?
I
1- .[:
11 U
IJ
"I
= •
I i.1 l
'
;
FA
rd
U 14
�4 r-t n)
rd
P, -0
1 rU
VI
j
U P,
(v 4)
p
{j r-4
Iw
14 ,-r -1-1
;7
(v
UJ of
-, I
It1
4
1I
1
U)
n) )4
1-I ' 1
:7 .-t In
In iv
1 I
D tU U
1-I n)
to
(1)
O
tl r-I
(U
V) n)
P, •-E A.
IJ
IU
ill
P, tU
1-I
1'.
41
1�
d
1d
44 U)
s
fu r I
Id to
-1-1 C.t
+J
Id -I}
(1)
A, ,n
_i
rd
•-1
0 f I
P,
S I
r
rl
rd .-1
0
a)
III -.4
N
:� rd r•
tF
1, In
rt-I
;�
.0
l4
(U
O
P, Q.
nl P,- 4
rt1
Q)
.p
.0 tv
'Ej
i
L� nJ
1�,,r:
b,
.p
ro
C1 O
x V r-E
ID,
N Ln r!
d 4�
t3�
u1 In
rI O
a
fv
1~
nl .["
r • nt
N
L)
u
U
nj
a} 41
IIl in
rU 41 U
Q).
rP - 1 A
''-I -j
I
� II -I
i-I
�r-1 of
0
.C: U
�
�; k -.-{
F:
rd
`.C. I-�
lr1
U
O
sl) �
)_!,
t)• rr1 r),
�
5; V] V)
CY,
rd r]
0 pr
1-4 1-1
0
;? :r:
0 {),
�'
-P () -P
'd
11) .I}
J,4 T1
Id
O'
.f ; F*
(Ti
s : . I
Ird
� .� V)
4J
14 Vf
'�'E
I U1
) •--1
(1)I
4 I
.1.1
I ;
Irvp
U]
d V, �I
'tl Ili
I} d
f.L
(1)
r-7
V)
IU .l3
U 'i3
(I)
'�
til 4j Aa
N
A
U
V)
V)
Q)
b,
-rf ID, �
0 rr •d
t~
r-C
•,.I -r1 U
�4 (2) to
rd Q
„It a
�
In
1-1
rr;
1I-1 U
U ; 4 ;
Q)
(d
E-1
U)
F1
U
f7
T'3
UI
/11
rd
•d
,U _CZ
U
tj (If
9-1
l s,
I)
N
r1

the incident from item Z above, the exact=aca-Lcn
of the =acil_zy, the location cr direct: cn of
movement GAL the spill, 'rieat :er and wind _ondUic_ns .
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
sn___ _eaves property cr enters surface waue
cal' local XMS Phcne mumhe= 9n-989 WO
C. instruce EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989-5380,�local swco
office phone number 919-989--5381 , and local MRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a . Conti ac tors Name;
2. Contractors Address Ss-L4)Ca /Awu4� C. Ccntractcrs Phcne:—
�9y- 6ss/
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
. Name: _Chris Smith_
b. Phone: [phone] - -- _
7: implement procedures as ad�7ised by DWO and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste Management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
::n.+aar.+aaniwae: tmcec-��en._cx

State of North
�
,Carolina
�: Department � Resod
• :
of Division s o of Water Quality Q� nsE� �oN
Q ty WATER
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 199�
ED
Z 8
w.
(THIS FORM NIAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE fI S AN ORIGINAOU
A,t %�
General Permit.-. Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operatipn • .
Rr, ,
�lorrDischatge Perm�t<ng
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review. °thefinformation for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If'a
not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
*questionFhas
any question unanswered.
IN
,GENERA
-
4 1 Facility Name: !&M Hog Farm Inc -
t1?rint
Land'Owner's name:' Benton Johnson
• v
1 "Mailing address:. 5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd
'rG1ty,�State` FourOaks NC Zip: 27524
't'•':� � = 4.ir�� Fay � �` ✓r
Telephone`NumbeC(include area code): 894-22,16
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
''I`5:,Fa6ility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include Sit numbers for state roads. Please include a
..L^ it _ •, .. - r
} ,,, rt r; ,,.3,. M{ •.
; copy.of.a.county road map,with the location of the farm identified): On N. west side of SK I t43, a rox. l mile south"cast
• "; ;` '
of intersection of SR 1150 and SR 1143.
E • `_
nt Farm''Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
Lessee's 1, Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is fisted):
� A
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1/1/93
;19=Date(s)of•FacilityExpansian(s)(ifapplicable):
F2.-=Iw
OPERATION. INFORMATION:
1
f y
r :
„
-,• Pik �•_ •, , _ `.
2 1 No.: ` ^� 51 (county number); 2K {facility number).
x
,Facility
2.2,�'Operati6n Description: Swine., operation
)�•
"r '`�'"' I-e3er to Finish
2880- Certified Design Capacity
Is'the above information eorrect7 yes; no^ if no, correct below using the design capacity ofthe facility
s '
The No. of Animals should be the maximum rum en or which the waste management structures were designed.
. _i" .- ,.- ... _�. .. , - .._
'L.� FL.y+#+:•.�,.ae.a. FFY r�"1
jj -.1, }� -n �:�- »
....b N r: i'�I
•Ny ,ape of swine ;� ',-No.*of Animals Type of Poultry "No, of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animal
J ,
-f
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
rM sr T -
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Beef
;z
1 ;
Farrow to Wean (4 sow) Turkey
_.
Fa tc
Farrow to Feeder (9 sow)
1'Sxz l �;,•
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
•
(Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-C 5128198 Page 1 of 4
51-28

12.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding, all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 4" 17 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4` Ntimbefof lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): %
2:5 "Aresubsurfacedrains present within 100' ofany of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
3 2.6 'Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES o NO (please circle one)
, � ,,I� L-
;,• .2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable. siting requirements? (Swine farm Siting; Act, NRC Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What•was the•date that this`facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? .�
�.
r What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? ! -- fc?
3 " ,!RE.71
QiJrRED}ITEMS�CFiECKL1ST Y.,
` lea
se,indicate;that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
Item- 7-- -
r, 'r• ` Anniirantc tnifink
✓3.1,�One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Pcrmit - Animal
Waste'Qperations;
ti.3 ';'t%3 2.tlTwo copses of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field: locations. where animal waste island applied;
'
Two'copiest'of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility
'does;not'have'a.CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
,-application'foranimal waste operations. .' .
.The CAWMP must include the following eomponents:
t � t+ ✓3.31 7:=fkhe WasteUtilizatiori Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
{ Nitro en PAN produced and utilized b the facility.
g ( )p Y y•
3:3 2-.The'method by;which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
: ✓3.3 3 1'',A map of'every field used for.land application.
✓3:314 ;The soil series present on every land application field.
3 5 , The:crops'grown on every land application field.
v ;lwxy�'•°,�` Y ✓i:3 6 "TI�e.Realistic Yield'>✓xpectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7' The PAN applied to every land application field.
.'',t : The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic:
! /3.3.1 ]'Emergency Action Plan,
, ♦ T• i A
� el 'A 11 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
'• * Le13; 13;0dor Control Checklist'with chosen best management'practices noted.
r. • t � � ^ �" tfi✓3,3 14 7Mortality,Control;Checklist;with'the selected method noted,
-b -
3 3 l5 Lagoonlstorage•pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
thafmay be applicable to your facility.
L; E w �+ e = 3 3 16;Operation and Maintenance Flan;
=.'If yourCAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
4'f'j?FORM:,AWO-G-E 5/28/98
•� S1�1..' n'.7y 1, . . h' _
Page 2 of 4 51 - 28

1'ca Y, . .r
RECFJ\JE�10N
�ERQUW-tilt
WA
SEP 2 8 W95
;.'Facility Number: 51 - 28
Facility Name: , J&M Hog Fame Inc ittln
glon-UischatSs perm 9
° 4 ,- APPLICAN S 9ERTIFICAT ON: :
/// (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
,`this`application (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
,"..has,been'teviewed.,by1 an is accurate and co lete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
' application'are riot�co pieted and that -if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
t package will b returned'lo i as incomplete.
��
,•,.Signature Date —�� _ �...
5 AANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only il'diffcrent from tlic Larid Owner)
*�•"1,'!I (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for `';'' (hacility name listed in'question 1.1) .
,� h Y P Y g 1 parts oI'tliis _.
as;been:reviewed b ine and is accurate and complete to the best of m knowled �e. !understand that if all m( aired
x�application' are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments ire not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.-
r h;rSlgnature` _ Date
77.
1:THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUI.)lNG ALL SUPPOIt'1'{NG INFORMATION AND MA'I'LEZIALS,
"'`,' SHOULD BE SENT TO.1'I IE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
41
rr '�";; i "• NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
N.N0N-Di5CHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
'POST OFFICE BOX 29535
IIALEIGH; NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
f,. }':; 'TELEPHONE NUMBER:' [phone]
FAX NUMBER:' [phone]
+`•'r', .
e' •
;, •, F.OIZM: AWO .G E ,5128198 I age 3 of 4 51 - 28

. ��
}3en7�v n o �'9� 017
Wettable Acres - Check -off List
1) CAWMP Wettable Acres Worksheet
2) CAWMP.Type Equipment Field Data Sheet
- 3) CAWMP Wettable Acres Computational Worksheets -
4) Form IRR-2 (note: one IRR-2 per computational worksheet)
5) Maps:
1. property lines ✓
2. buildings
3. lagoons ✓ ✓
4. wells, used and abandoned
5. ponds ✓
6. streams
7. highways
8. farm roads
9. application sites (fields)'
10. homes, churches, etc.
11. north arrows and scale (1:400', 1:200', etc.)

V
$e�%�an ���sa✓J
CERTIFIED ANIMAL WASTE -MANAGEMENT PLAN (CAWMP)
WETTABLE ACRE DETERMINATPONS
1. General Instructions
a. The CAWMP Field Data Sheet(s) is/are used to provide data on the irrigation system(s)
being used on the farm and the wetted acres are computed using the appropriate computation
method for CAWMP wettable acres, depending on the type of irrigation system. The data
sheets and computation sheets will be attached to the CAWMP and copies of the entire file
will be located in the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and in the farm
records. The farm file should be available to Division of Water Quality (DWQ) inspectors.. _ _...._._
and Division of Soil and Water (DSW) operational review personnel.
b. If a detailed map of the buildings, lagoon(s) and land application areas is not available,
obtain or generate a map of the property to a defined scale. The map will include all fields
used for land application of wastewater. Locate on the map property lines, buildings,
lagoons, wells (whether used or abandoned), ponds, streams, highways, farm roads and all
land application sites. Also show all residences and places of public assembly that are within
200 feet of a land application area and all wells that are within 100 feet of a land application
area. There, are a number of sources of maps. These include FSA maps which generally
have a scale of 1-inch = 660 feet and county tax maps which normally have a scale of I -inch
= 400 feet or 1-inch = 200 feet. Some counties now have the capability to generate a map
from GIS data. These are generally more up to date and provide much greater detail. It is
also possible to survey with total station equipment and generate an up-to-date map. Some
growers may elect to have an aerial photo made of the property and this provides an up-to-
date map. Some eastern counties can provide maps prepared after Hurricane Fran. The scale
on the map needs to be large enough to show details of the particular irrigation system being
used. For example for a hard -hose traveler system a scale of I -inch = 330 feet might be
adequate. For a stationary sprinkler or stationary gun system, a scale of 1-inch = 200 feet is
the minimum scale that will provide the detail needed. The map selected must be adequate
to provide an accurate field by field description such that irrigated acres can be obtained. Be
sure that the scale is shown on the map and the north direction indicated. If a map is
enlarged, ensure that the scale_ remains -accurate. _ This_mav require having the
enlargement done by some commercial company that will guarantee accuracy,
2. There are potentially seven types of irrigation systems that can be used. Check below to indicate
the type(s) used on the farm.
a. Hard -hose traveler
b. Stationary sprinkler system with permanent pipe
c. Stationary sprinkler system with portable pipe
d. Stationary gun system with permanent pipe
e. Stationary gun system with portable pipe
f. Center -pivot system
g. Linear -move system

CERTIFIED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
WETTABLE ACRES WORKSHEET
Farm Name: -2-Aa / In &c Facility Number: —5-/
11-i�_
Manager or Producer _Se 01 a its a" Phone # 9/91 89f/ ;aaygl
C
Technical Specialist: Phone # / --5 F
Facility Contact: .23 e•7 4', 6 /�'50 _ Phone # �2[l ��� .?s?/b
Mailing Address: S-//D Jaael
Was farm sited for animals prior to 10/1/95: es No
If No, date farm sited for animals: I I
Irrieation System Tvoe
(Check all that apply)
Stationary sprinkler with permanent pipe
Stationary sprinkler with portable pipe
Stationary gun with permanent pipe
Stationary gun with portable pipe
Center -pivot system
Linear -move system
Hose drag traveler
Acres calculated should correspond to that shown in the Waste Utilization Plan and
Form IRR-? .
To the best of my knowledge, this worksheets) and map(s) provides an accurate
representation of the system used to irrigate the animal waste generated by this operation.
Signatur/OVLwmger or Producer)
Z;2,/9q
Date

GWI
CANVMP HARD -HOSE TRAVELER FIELD DATA SHEET *
1. Make and model number r =5,3
2. Hose length and hose inside diam er (ID) D ' — 3 `"
3. Gun make and model number e ' - Q,,
4. Gun nozzle size ,4 inch, ring orifice, taper bore orifice.
(May need to measure nozzle diameter.
5. Hydrant spacing S feet. Indicate whether form, _ random.
Number of exterio�ants /O Number of interior hydrants r7
6. Operating pressure at hose reel d0 psi. '
observed at working gauge, provided.by owner.._..._.... _._ ..__._...__. _._..._..._..._ ..
7. ' Gun wetted diameter to ' feet.
measured, based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure 26 psi.
observed at working gauge, based on calculations (show calculations),
determined from gun charts.
* *9. Supply line size 4 /� inch (from pump to last hydrant).
* * 10. Supply line length A,Zits feet (maxi pumping distance).
* * 11. Supply line type PVC, aluminum.
** 12. Pump make and model number,
* * 13. Pump capacity, -3M gpm.
** 14. Engine make and model number 27A or
** 15. Electric motor horsepower and rpm hp rpm
Note- It is strongly recommended that operating pressure at the reel and gun wetted
diameter be field determined.
Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart for
each travel lane and show distance traveled. Also indicate the normal arc angle of the gun for
each pull through a field. Show the location of the supply line. Irrigated acres will be
determined by travel lane
* * Optional data, furnish where possible.
* * * Information furnished by
Signature ofO)Ker or Facility
..;1
_ Br...I-% a oh1% -!5b v1_
Printed Name of Owner or Facility Representative
and/or
Signature of Technical Specialist
al
/t S
Printed name of Technical Specialist
Date— _z z - I? T `� Date 71-12 c:
*** Only the person or persons collecting the data s ould sign the data sheet.

CAWkiP WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) 7��j �b ^_ Field Number (Identification) / _ 4 g
i
2. Irrigation System Designation
3. Type of Irrigation System
Existing Irrigation System
New / Expanded Irrigation System
Stationary Sprinkler, Gan r,,-' Hard -Hose Traveler
Center Pivot Linear -move System
4. Number of Stationary Sprinklers # Interior sprinklers # Exterior sprinklers
Number of Travel Lanes C:�_ # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes
5. Wetted Diameter O feet From field data sheet Length,of pull [feet]
6. Spacing / 8 `j Lateral /Hydrant Spacing [feet] [as percentage of wetted diameter]
Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet] [as percentage of wetted diameter]
7. Sprinkler or Hydrant Layout Multiple Laterals/Hydrants
Single Lateral/Hydrant Excessively spaced Sprinklers/Hydrants
8. Read the irrigated area per sprinkler/traveI pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate tabale
and column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinkler/travel lane location.
Stationary Sprinklers
Acres per Interior sprinkler from Table Column
Acres per Exterior sprinkler from Table Column
Traveler: Interior Hydrant (travel lane)
s•Ge / 11xe le (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
P_ Z (b) Acres middle portion of pull
(Pull Lenath [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]} ! 43,560
LVo -�C S{P� (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Interior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
Traveler: Exterior Hydrant (travel lane)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull
(Pull LenGth [feet] X Wetted Width [feet])/ 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Exterior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
9. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler or travel pull by the number of sprinklers or pulls
of each category in the field. Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per Interior Sprinkler or Pull X # Sprinklers or Pulls = Acres
(b) Acres per Exterior Sprinkler or Pull X # Sprinklers or Pulls = Acres
Total Wettable Acre for field (Sum: 9 + 9b)
l
NVettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed byi Date: 7

CAWNIP WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) ES 93 _ Field Number (Identification) p? ,4
2. Irrigation System Designation Existinn Irrigation System
New / Expanded Irrigation System
3. Type of Irrigation System
Stationary SprinklecG�4 Hard -Hose Traveler
Center Pivot Linear -move System
4. Number of Stationary Sprinklers 4 Interior sprinklers 9 Exterior sprinklers
Number of Travel Lanes 9 Interior Lanes r _ # E-cterior Lanes
5. Wetted Diameter [feet] From field data sheet .. Length of pull [feet]
6. Spacing / s 9 Lateral / Hydrant Spacing [feet] r O _ f as percentage of wetted diameter]
Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet] [as percentage of «vetted diameter]
7. Sprinkler or Hydrant Layout Multiple Laterals/Hydrants
Single Lateral/Hydrant Excessively spaced Sprinklers/Hydrants
8. Read the irrigated area per sprinkler/travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate tabale
and column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinkler/travel lane location.
Stationary Sprinklers
Acres per Interior sprinkler from Table Column
Acres per Exterior sprinkler from Table Column
Traveler: Interior Hydrant (travel lane)
I / (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
See /a�/p �`IPU (b) Acres middle portion of pull
WOy,�� -S�r e� {Pull Length} [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Interior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
Traveler: Exterior Hydrant (travel lane)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull
{Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet])/43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Exterior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
9. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler or travel pull by the number of sprinklers or pulls
of each category in the field. Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per Interior Sprinl`.ler or Pull X r Sprinklers or Pulls = Acres
(b) Acres per Exterior Sprinkler or Pull X Sprinklers or Pulls = Acres
..3,;4 Total Wettable Acre for field (Sum: 9 + 9b}
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: �L/ Date:

CAWhIP WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WOKKSHE!• T
1. Farm Number (Identification) T,645 Field Number (Identification) S
s'ms -3
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System . .2—
hew / Expanded Irrigation System
3. Type of Irrigation System Stationary Sprinkier C-o j Hard -Hose Traveler
Center Pivot Linear -move System
4. Number of Stationary Sprinklers 9 Interior sprinklers # Exterior sprinklers
Number of Travel Lanes m Interior Lanes 2— - # Exterior Lanes
5. Netted Diameter—— [feet] From field data sheet Length of pull [feet]
6. Spacing Lateral / Hydrant Spacing [feet] [as percentage of wetted diameter]
Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet] [as percentage of wetted diameter]
7. Sprinkler or Hydrant Layout Multiple Laterals/Hydrants
Single Lateral/Hydrant Excessively spaced Sprinlders/Hydrants
8, Read the irrigated area per sprinkler/travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate tabale
and column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinlaerhravel lane location.
Stationary Sprin?tiers
Acres per Interior sprinkler from Table Column
Acres per Exterior sprinkler from Table Column
Traveler: Interior Hydrant (travel lane)
rr (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
S e e 'q chP� (b) Acres noddle ponion of pull
Gc NIA 51eel- (Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]) /43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Interior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
Traveler: Exterior Hydrant (travel lane)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table . Column
(b) Acres middle ponion of pull
(Pull Length [feet] X Wettdd Width [feet])/ 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Exterior pull (Sum: a + b + c) -
9. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler or travel pull by the number of sprinklers or pulls
of each category in the field. Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per Interior Sprinlder or Pull X R Sprinklers or Pulls =
(b) Acres per Exterior Sprinkler or Pull X 9 Sprinkers or Pulls
v Total Wettable Acre for field (Sum: 9a + 9b)
%Vc;table Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Zc GCJ
Acres
Acres
Date0,2

/ �✓ L~ate 70 0 A'�
^.y�/�-• Ir J
�/ I '� �iJ /� ��JV / y. �—/�4J � rw^' / � ��/.JS f
�511'� •/ �.
� /I P / / ! G
1 J I
-27
7,0 A I
•
� �,::; �. <= ' - ; � �--�� �. -- /ate' ^ ��
—
. o
yl i �• G.f
7`7,
d,

4.2
-7j
-2
f 4

la5--loo
.2 0
;G-4

i
-- --------------
VIP/

.� � ��1..—rya -�3� �pD) .��8s � — . �� ,��
1v r o
-------------
h cl 7o /h l -/ .

41 o
tot
Y

no
IX

<7
-------------
-- n�7--
I-

4 Ifn�Y�VW3 L, ��7N ,f / Y ` W'a iiiJ kr �� •I R�F6 „" y `F� i�P 4r
+� J .p �,� ,�r;, �,��+�, .t,4a �� �� � rr �.� _ � >u e� tom •�Coyi,'���iea. _ } �' �� '
tt i,Sf ,igs":
��
}Z'4^
1 { " � + r � `ter ;_ , �r�i` o fry Si ,�a�"G� •e ( t 'tti'v "�J�7p } 1 I?�•(.1�17¢ D!4 e, 0 pGRA�l
TMAL+ W' E
s -UTILIZATION
' < t •� i a 'k' srr fs r~ w. la's sr P e- ' 3-AS
a . r r
1"l!"";?�!; Ah y? at,
� ,k k 'w �o r�i � a' V J�� �3 r 4. i r' p r rtti SE —�Q / "' j�j�
4 ,.titi "f� itr''+•1, ,�„i' A++y r
A. w C"� �1anal' '. a. _ i• ! , ''
r.�}� r.i'� n r,. ✓ e:�' 3 1j �,�±. 3 1T kr 1ti L1.J rc`-0
rryy., �5 •�{ E. � �
�" �L *• 'f.�."�k ° 1'��'Sf: 4 r S�.'"-rr. , t7 �#,l;r R ,r; �"` ;i � T t . -s'' S , d � a ., '•q �. e
z�J AND:�IM HOG jFARM ,'INC .,;.` 9J.
ttc.�.r"� .l, •,- tr`
5 .�•� �� Ty.v4'�j•��� j { rr -,t 1Y �'1�`'f• %� r "-,E'.,,a _ ,J „ ";: � 1,^..=.y,�� i;.
St �� , 4 ii• i''Ml a, fv' "�y , k.,K'farYrd U K;y ,,t,! "t,�rs r'a 0 " '' - rY.. F F ;-•. _ F D
t �? :LoCation:�"ri"�t '`� ° `: 45110';STRICRLAND' CROSSROADS ROAD;"RECEIV
>r ,.c3 •r7 x �°�-� �� , , t' � - ' ,YY
+�tti Y�F� #C + :'t� P u w." na R,� 4�wr i t FOUR�`OARS NC 27'S$4 WAZERQPAU
5 Sa't f +�r ..Yx �• ,r• t ji,SL� Tlephoxet 919 $94-2- a 984rttsk ' 9
r
i.
�R A_�s,.lrrr�� r � r,. i ,F �, c•R�.S'r'8 'x�'G � s r -� _.t r � , r ": iJ'� 4 F } - � ... . ,.. ! i K
r i �, +, r>` + ' ' - '• t -"'i� a, + "', l;tx 's.tin .Feed@rs�tC. Flnl•sri SW].A8 1 IIlg ,
1r
�µ� "x = r lss �4'��iM [''(
jtYS'L>i�y '{�,`.. • r�-�s.�k4l, +A {',
1111 ,f�+"M'� Number f Anim 1 Z880n e s ti s r la • f,.T3 i:ts •00'rioga
o�.
h Ra r .,x'• t' d erwx r �•Cr��a rak"r P N's 1 ,� r,-. - N
�► 'Design Capacity)
3'j , d + 'n7rr'l ai 1r° r �h A.4�"s ,- a "��4 i,��z � fir , 1i4• nX t �`• ' '' 1f c 'x.
"f,
S}tw'. i��, 3�',.t,. ,�L'�p '.•1' a.-.1f:x. �+7 " , 14 �V ,. f,at'
And
�Yt yq - �z .;BTORA(3E STrR,UCTURE'.,,�ti`�,;r y �t e-robiC Waste Treatment Lagoon
t=3.a?s .l'r •lij` adF�' 1 ��`„r �,i t`?M�r _"1S'F,,r ,ff, r+• -1 Y ,:s • y 1 i t`- -'t lt.
APP,�LsICATi' k.METROD � Irrigation
4411,
b 4a� ' psn y za°,a,{} t i cau Tr^ kvtt: s i g
sinl"ix z ra r a 4 Fir ,r _
The waste,)4fromj!your `anxma'l.,•facility .}must, be jand,,.app].ied''at a
t spy cifs3edy a e to prevent pollution of 'surface.,"Water`-'and/ .or
���' .' g bundaatjdrf;�1The�5pl`ant= nuts ants in.;thetanimal'.waste should' be;;used
to,
raduxce tithe 'amount ¢a aommerc�a7' fertilizer required for'"their�c3r•ops r y
"} In,., -hey' fde d`s!!�wh'�ere4i,the-,7waste't`is to be t;applied' Y `: km x=
' `i .tt }- 4 •m 5 ° (1 '" t to 11.'
7���'� }��qg ��,�, ;F;',�k�-� ��,, r � tS; �''�de_ t•t�'f. s+:s r�w$��S fk �V �'°���, �• `ti`ra r-s r', - 1sx F � '_
r `'� 1#dA?4 �t`1 �.a�. r�, •,agsj`r `t�,,y�-a�."tT S �'s'Ti ,3` Ys4 �,`�i �.. .t".rt.. - •'°+`' �-' ar�.���M�l if r�
�3� ,��Thits° �was_te utyl:i�zat,ion p,p.L,an��uses nitrogen�as the' iimxti ng mutrient
` ash�ouFld'be,,'analy,,,zedrbefore'.each';appli cation cycle Annual,;` soil's, 1"fj��
fiy} i tt',}i:,rr• '1e".s Y•'€9- �"�ray^-,�[',srrti - �;r J;`; r F f f rk r
s pare, strongly encouraged.so' thatta a11.;:rplant; nutrz ants; ,,can',
vy%i r a 1 ty +r - r „r "
ba]anddd0for� real��sti'c ,yields;' of the 5,crop rrtto the-.grown.,,
���`g�'G;1's `'� .Fy a�'R'{,'��4 -h23 rtiy-ZJ'..rt r� R-;1`'lnk�rr4lr�. 4r�,: x''f, #,•.' i.rt.,� -J a. M I�r-`it -
I ti ss �' ' 2tr}H�hg s`k Y:�ytirl+#+;�" ;4t+e 1�t a. s. �f. ,..,��Y..a '"; L }•.. r
�y` �; itrC• T [ 4 r3 'F 1 t. f�: f i .{ �,
Several factors+sare` ram or,tant'rsin im lementin � our waste 'utfllzatiow,
�'tifi�ti4 „ 'w. HMv�r� ,sr .� - P,•.4 p g 'y a
,plani#order�tof�maximi`ze:Nthe"fertilizer':value, of `the �waste;and,;tos ,, °,
r �,r ensurethat Milie
lt safe environmentally ' safe manner q ''.. ,4Y.• ,
�': ��+m�i'•H r:"x. tj.
�H4�.kf'•i. h �tk4`i ; o-,'�,'��`t'ki r - �'k.'r .x,' ,rt� •�}'v' hC-�
Aalways I apply rwaste ~based an'the•;tneeds. of the .'crop, "toy be N r ,
' a_ grown -,sand 1;the nutrient , content, of "the waste.I Do,enot f
y n j,s 1 a ,f,..G 1 t! ti{. -,-
, t �� � more anitrogen;than the crop,,can utilize:
� � �`s'Y►' + Ebt' � :,. � + ic4 a•i.y,.p - •u �
R'1ti � e 'S .7• .._rx. � !, �`� r.:llt7, w Y ,% , 4 ' 1 r,,:, -i' - '[ r,y -. - �#'•'S � i!,'4Prs`=, :yR t 4j 6. C �. '�',i 't' .;ik. k ,,- ,r`` i tR .,• r- •, S , �;�er}fsc`t'
`�,50%. i�tty,pfes.;4are important as�'ctheytb;ha_ ve ;different61nfilltration
s k rates,`;'leachangazpotentials=,cation' exchange capacities`, "and,
r7. •;„ t }?"�. '4 rx -,,. i - r-' gfi a •. r' '" c r s f-' d s a . r�3.
•'4iavai�lable1,wrater,'hold'ing' capacities.
J� i "�. t : dappX• , tq"'' tr
544,i`rr�`m?yy, id 1�T�+"F�. a,'.: n ° +- - '� f, -•'t
a!^� ;( ja r t 4443r't'Normalily�waste shall be .applied to ;land, erodi�ngw4at , less § than�`';f '
'� t"a dM}Masv r. L'^ryl#F`tkrt•,., ^¢� Ftr7r••, ti- , .'y ; ° ". A' - - f.
� ? y, t".,� �5 titons per "'acre..per year. :Was. e4may' -°be. appl'a ed ta: xland �� •:r
u Q.�t tferodzri 'fat ,:5 �, _ ,,ri
ar."rnore 'more -",ton °per acre annually',',but less 'than is
r g' ;
w'.pw Y�lOtoiispery acreper °year providing ''that adequate'>kfilter '
-"A
" i
s��a trK ,i'��� z �s;� �ay'��r'` rstrips" are�r established .
1 i{`grh �St^�'k�+t{;�Yt" s,. Y a, 24 dt Kf
'9.i"t,s� •t4,Y��%-4i ��y',k�"rl�'�,'T ,:`.ci}. r "! a' ;` - l"r"<-�x °1.. •r .yr �..t r. F' - r ,� ,, f
r33f��Do�nat�tapp'lyYrwaste .ori h`saturatedr„soils,,�< when a t is'`r.ainang,, q '�
+�,-i`[-,i 'r,y„^�r_ +s ,'S �,- t' ,q, ,6 �e a-;,- •: - "r., - "' , ` { l" -1
r' Ror'whenF the'ksurface,.ds"frozen '' '!Either,',of` thesec,c'ondit ons-
x rlr �`?q '"�Y�1:i^�aM1..'•«.�r;C Y,'?.w ! +''. •,li -
r } f **i t �ma , result „in r.unaf•f��to' surface',waters 'which:,.isf not allowed'; �U�r,
a`.}`F.gr,•r^+t,'.u'1s':'xfi3`'sAi ow"; 1 ?j'risr 34 rrF-;: a,^ ,L,; •rr .l " r --_ e
s :3`{s�3 .t4 �(y�i : •�f%�+�rr-.,max{under, ~,DEM regulations
�aw��. •L r.IhrY� -�"'J .i ale "4Tsi'�*Y ' Ki„'Y"'!`.r,.l �•,,,•k_�, !'rs'.t. r .,q r�- i' c
t P A""�Ef°" I v�4r+4a Y x vyt,
h
i�.tr-
f �. A ♦ r� - �� t k ;��,t�" a� �"� a s � "'r.{ .p s!i' s •r ! � � ' r"c -' - a Y^
,�.q, r i ��f It,�j "G MR���^_��.IYrr7 iM. n ��G r } �, r 7 t }'s,t,�:� r � �� . (r � i eyo? r f "R F�,T r,r 1 .. h - C• � „�
'WV4�
),^'T� � v. k� �` , Tj Ft.
s". Y'`,., '�a 1'N! Fi " �{ 1 a` air ° fo.: : i '�F,a * tr, ,'r.1h + f - `� • r'� s .; {.•...
EIpi,,1�.
'All,+ „?,�,."r 1 + :.,� -a_: , "d., ',• �, +�I,F
s S tf'�`� .t.t ;d •'t ', c �yrtr y l' 7 } r - r «vst
t{ `ta .i .•' .pw ``/�`s/tn?1.', ras_''.•�"a'1'�fs5.�}r•r�,Sy,s., rr 71="le "paC@L 1 +-;fit �a• '
th n�t3t �, r'r r i�'r,Y"nMFh fd y41 v :tYµ ,s h.l ��i f t i+ S
•"Tr`,,,?o`.�:'.'il'h''".. s'.IM�'. N -� rf 4�,..�.i.ei�`�:it!ri Yr!„t. xi.e:.,i3. .r,.u�i„!-arP::du'.a.7.:S ha }:,. . ..'..i .l.,. i . c,.. .. ., .etM.�•iia"*i�,11:,.:
r. R:{� 3 ,fir...,z�r i tom. �r1W:. ��.a.ri" •

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. if
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
```-,,plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
:{.,'..The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
(,typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
:. waste'management facility., In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis'. made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
"-Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
__`so'•as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
.'Lime must be applied to maintain pii in the optimum range for specific
crop'` production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
,,,.for.'compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
.. L
`f ',2880 hogs x 1..9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
= +.-1,2880 hogs-x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 lbs. PAN/year
#.
'`Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
_.'"..The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
,•: r;, .the crop to .be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

••�.�--"fit; .• -
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
.,TRACT
FIELD
'SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
.,,
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
Owl,
4340,
3
GeB
BH
8
400
0
9.46
3784
I
APR.
SEPT.. .
43401�!P ' ,
4" GeB
BH 8 400 0
11-54 jG1G
I
APR.-
SEPT.
4340.•.:
UN1 GeB
BH 8 400 0
:..
12.12 1848
I
APR. -
SEPT.
0!7,
UN2 GeB
BH 8 0
I
1400 1.35 1140
APR. - ,
SEPT., ,
END
TOTAL15388
_ '".:'-.,.--Indicates
that this
field is being overseeded (i.e.
'.'
i]nterplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
efoYN
eNOTE:..`
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while `meeting the N
requirements. In the future, regulations
may''require farmers
in some parts of North Carolina to have a
f;�",=•.
nutrient management
plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan, only addresses
nitrogen.
', :
Page:
3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
'(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
Z4;
---
or
-------
APPLY
RESZD.
APPLIC
`a
METH
N
TIME
5673 . "
1 , '
Ly
FP
4
200
0
1.3
260
•
-
SEP-APR
5673,
2:=
GeB
FP
4
0
6
1200
.
1200
FEB.
OCT.,
434Q,.
GoA
C
7.2
981
1125.01136.25120
MAR
340, _ •: ,
--1, ;,
GOA
W
0
��`�;, •.
I
160.0
1120
17.2 1864
FEB-MAR
4'340 .. '
--1
GoA
SB
35
140
7. 2
-APR.-
1008
AUG` `-
4"340�`
2
3.36
JGoA
IC
1125.01136.25120
1457.8
MAR-JUN
' -t4340"-r
-2
GOA
W
60.0
3.36
1120
10.
1403.2
FEB-MAR
^-2
GoA
SB
39
0
JAPR.
1156
1_3�524.16
-
AUG
4.140 ;
7_.•,
GeB
IC
175.0
173.75
120
1_33�-26240.425
MAR-JUN
-7
GeB
W
0
138
191.2
13.26 1297.312
FEB-
APR..
E
ySI- 7-
434,0:.
�7
SB
28
112
0
3.26
�.'
JGeB
1365.12
APR. -
Page:
4

ANIMAL WASTE
UTILIZATION
PLAN
e
434.0 .,.
8" GeB
f C 75.0
11.59
854.762
;,•;.
I
173.75 120
MAR-JUN
4340' ."
8" GeB
0
JW 138
191.2
111.5911057.00
FEB-
APRM1.
OH.
434:0_,
�-8 GeB
SB 28
112 0
11.59
1298.08
h
�.;
FEB . -
APR. '
43.4,0.;,,,;. „
GeB
20
1.6.
1
IC 175.0
173.75_]
15.2
1383.5
MAR-JUN
4340',;, ..
�-6 „ . GeB
JW 138
191.2 0
15.2
474 . 24
FEB`. APR...
'
Ar-
7 D•aq
4340,.
6 , :' r GeB
SB 28
112
5.2
1582.4
APR. -
AU
END
�.�..;
TOTAL
'Indicates that -this field is
being overseeded
(i.e. interplanted) or,
winter 'annuals follow summer
annuals.
tip' •,
'
*.*
Acreage 'figures may exceed total
Y
acreage
9
in fields due
to
overseeding
bsf AW N (animal waste nitrogen)
equals
total required
nitrogen
'' ,•,
aess� any commercial nitrogen
(COMM N) supplied.
F;,The'following"legend explains the
crop codes
used in tables
1 and
2 above:
y,r
;CROP.^;.CODE';` CROP UNITS PER UNIT
BH,; ",HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY 50
Page:

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
f}
FP .
SB
W
CORN
:TALL FESCUE --PASTURE
• SOYBEANS
WHEAT
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
TABLE 1
• ,;. two,"'"ia .
-TABLE 2
.; TOTAL..
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
13.47
5388
49:5
�99
�3ss�q
62.97
�
ZZ9q.3R
* BALANCE
�h}EYt5�0 U7 5
BUSHELS
BUSHELS
1.25
50
4
2.4
6,;,: ;_`•, *.** ;.'This .'number must be less than or equal to o in order to
=? fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
t •,
i,a t.tiH r• R"; .1 l
7y Page; 6

ANIMAL, WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
'I*** °'" .,This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
.; utilize 'the animal waste N produced.
"''Acres,'shown'.in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
",usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
.:-odd,�areas"unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
r,,r
;���`•,�;fu-lh'application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
cres",.in',4.the;'fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
e ,;.acres. shown in the tables.
_ .�. •ate __... ........ .._..: .., _..._ ..._. ..... .. .. ....._ .. _ ._ ..
ee attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
'animal` waste.
i, •,,SLUDGE -_APPLICATION :
waste;'°utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
`;,applcat.ian of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
4�, r,iohS> and?,;;wi1V., require precautionary measures to prevent over application
rri Pof,P nutrients ,or. other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximatelyY'1.065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
°sludge.
f wyou',.remave': the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5328
pounds' of:;';PAN,'to .utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
' �berinudagrass"hay land at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
need+ 17,'.76. acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
j kr the�rat'e of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 42 .624 acres
f+`l'and•.,' Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
" and,needed Actual requirements could vary by 25 o depending on your
'sludge.'waete'analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
:44.�':
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
Theirri ation'lication rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
,g app
:: soil', t'..the`time of irrigation such that runoff or ondin occurs. This,
r g p �1
'.Karerate;T,is->limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
,--,texture;-.:,water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
` 'should, not -exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
{;time of.'"•"irrigation nor should ' the plant available nitrogen applied exceed-..
' he )`nitrogen' needs of -the crop.
?,,surfaceirrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
x,cr}r�t,.is the,=responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
fthat an,,irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
R own'•in ?Tables ' 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
rti ,
4 r Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
:amounts•of.nitrogen
shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
�,The.:following
table
is provided as a
guide for establishing application
;rrates':.and ',amounts.,
1.
I Application
Rate I Applic. Amount
a.:
Tracts>u:I;'Field :'I.
Soil�,Type I Crop
I (in/hr)
I (inches)
4340'-'.('=I d 1, "I
GOA
I C
I .40
I *1
.I
43`40�•'I' •2
GoA
I C
I .40
I *�
43.40 I, 3 I
GeB
I BH
I .35
I *1
4.3 4 ..
'GeB
I BH
I .35
I * 1
434�0�- 6 I
GeB
I C
I .35
I *1
4340' I° 7 I
GeB,
I C
I .35
I *1
f•, r• .r���9 1
4,34�0,`•�.I8`, x �� �.
GeB.
I C
I. .35
I *1
43.9 8,; i
GeB "
I W
I .35
I *1
C Y' I` • L Y I
1
l
I
4f3i4�0t
GeB
BH
I .35
I *1
` 340 h'c I `"UN2 `.
GeB
I BH
I .35
I *1
�;,4Y� ,,. ; :.t *•* ';
;
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
i
4340'�Y',,�' _�1 ' ' �:' GOA
f SB
.40
*1
4340w�1� €�1. GOA
W
.40
*1
43403� " 2.' �; GOA
! SB
f .40
*1
,�
434ai t--2^° GOA
W
.40
*1
' 1
434GeB
SB
f .35
*1
. :3.'y� �.�.:� . ',t• t•1.
4340; ` 6_ s I . GeB
f W
.35 f
*1
,. hi' 'i
fir} �•Wj[�-
,k
., i � ,.23
F-7
43400,-)1 �:"~ GeB
SB
.35
*1
43,40tF,,�;�� GeB'
� � W
�.35
1
434°Y0:� ''I z.•�-8, ,:I GeB
SB
i .35 j
*1
5673' kii;l`N :1 '� �', Ly
FP
. 4
*1
:2A:= ,;; GeB'
FP
I .35
*1
This is; the maximum
application
amount allowed for the
.moil
assuming;, -the .amount'
of nitrogen
allowed for the crop
is
not over
applied many` situations, the application amount
shown
cannot
VIn
Page: 9

Fie!;j
ANIMAL.,WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
' _`,"be'applied because.of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
,':%0- + ;;.', application' amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
-
�.:;' Your.' fac l:ity4, is designed for 180. 00 days of temporary storage and
storage must be removed on the average of once every
s6.00',zmonths In `' no "instance should the volume of the waste be stored
n,your;''structure be °within the 25 year '24 hour. storm storage or one
t:',-'.',foot .`of l •,freeboard', except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is'the'responsibility of the producer and waste -applicator to
<<ensure:'aHat =.tihe : spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
..., ,
="�" "corr,ect',"rates `,to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
'. 4.14i .....:.
x `the xecbmmended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
Y make�.'th d-plan .invalid.
v�,SCallyour, technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
repot V ,for,.; assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
txP Plication rate prior to applyingthe waste.he ro .er aPNARRATIVE OF OPERATION
rat
• i I g',I,f4 `
t
Page: 10

_'�1 P-#'fr' �4x") i __ Mh t' �' ,• r - l \ II t'r�.',
y„rj,,F• 7"t 7.4 t L d,A J. -�„' —g 4
71 llai N 1+y se a.,ior
y p' 111R G—ilia
1➢9► e
',+�Str1�x�ISr� /� ri�ir � ,'rf ✓ '�� � rt4e7 ��`�-.
� L` 't�^��,J .r�/ cti �' •s.. . � q 1 11dE � iy �n.
f ,r i4'�,f-:}f ; .44rA ,.. •,J ,, ;' ,"Jtl
s.d"' i• 7 �/�-•�-
llEL LIIIL
4>
1lgt.Uil
CJeotdad.
aw 7a 4
Oil
lb
Im
' rA'' ia� tit_ ' i ..,� f 11l4? ^ LIl2 r • � � : •~. L!L � 7 + - 117E , '�
,.,ye' �E�"� i'. �' v ti •r ;t� a� ► Lisa w .v
�y a - `t r.' GoMeoad. l7 ` LIAR
1t4i5�.6 - lam' Srar.r ilia 'r ML
LU
' {{��ii �"5'R:'`L` sw:+.•, �' .0 �di y 'i, "1`- 'r. •' - .1171«''..i!' - ,''!: tJEa .. ..... �.,. - kls�f ,._:• Ji:
4r10hC4�,
96a• yyJ
LM 'i• z' y
Y
UL
�, +d tr _ L77I �: Y/LIEF f lessi1sa 'a LI71 Lu: z
,� ' F a } ,",..,,1111 i 4 9.1, .. Llll .;JL•3 4a• - .ss,
�. I.J ,. u• \6
r 1 a�lL , 1 i } V • ` 1111
F-A— 44�
J s K ' 7tll I .rs ►.w .'ll . ,ryWA
5
j ;V�Y?�fw a l t ds \ 1141 Fi 12n y
. } ills. _ i Lm ll[! I
•ii i. .. J-UL
AENSOId lfof .J fl! •a 11-U. f t J lw ') •r•!: 3
Lts .• LvL 1 " 1
} `�`' �� r�'��„t�� � [' • V`�.. x�^ -.x � 1741 _,µ.9s � , Weed, r y ! �4 ve
.� - ;,,• i J ,Ir'� ky , iliQ :y LLLL.
• � yJ r , n� .. �. \ .. � � '. J � r .•. 4 � Lill
y, i iJa I 1 lLll lin 37
44 h t .o
+r ' i t +
M{c(ay
�t w
_ �i r •` u
,t
F� a„ �j N rY}rFair r I( , �Y i �s•- i J. 1 lur P
J`lls�l .s
Ny Fop an' a '
{�,; ,.¢ � ill M1s«-^ - i ', "7�r ,• +e _.
j ,r •I.,y',' I s fir+, ,i
a. h
1 �� � k"i�'i f ✓k1�L Y iV'Rd � �,� i '
MA
• 4
UTZ
UTZ
Ch
% . 1441.
Mr
\ 14 UYA
r \
L man
OfMW
LATTWWAD
!1 L4 ; \
sn_
J
HFI>». y 4 r
i
111) ,Y' •
11l1 � t. AllL ',
e7. - Lee!
^ ras
1' .7 s
,,�ci
d'ol NOT(, MAP tNQUOEs O+
OR IM>ORTAN7 ,•
0. MILEAGE NOT $01
ROA05 W1OwN

k7r a`S t r :��t"'} 4 irS r- k' ..{ } r'xt r - - - ',•
Jw
f 0
rtiJ'j
c t a
'.. ,,.rry�rr�as ,,ti, i yr+ r„sP rrj,kr� r '• ,.• .. r_; .,
}3 -N'Iortality Manaaement Nlethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
> ��{ k�7 � l z h �E Eai,. r � S '• t �v.I _ ..,.
,Burial, three:" feet .beneath•L.the surface of -the ground within 2 hours after
.naw le gP of the death. The burial must be at least 3300 feet from any tlowin2
r { stream'or public`bodv of water.
n :
•Rende',' at'a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
+ i14 5 - - •
r.
, ::!' u J—omplete,incineration
T-v1 $FF'tvY44,
' rat ;In thecase'of, dead poultry. only, piacing in a disposal pit'of a size and design'
4r'raPProvea by the;Departme:tt of Agriculture
`>,fAny,method which°Jn•the. ofessional opinion of the'Scate Vote inaria.n would
Y stl i� r9fi, tt x {make"passible the salvage .of part of a dead animal's value %uncut endangering
=hi+man or animal- health. (Written approval of -,the State Veterinarian crust be
tattached)
4rr�h
+k
ryV JS aN. i".Yrl^y. p S Sh ryT "
� � �'� �?�'3..kJ � is FR rr_ •'
..Sr- Ylrl�t rS��,V��n }'iA?' •ti s'
h'FK ,L1;3!t+" S�i.l. + •-� 'ij 1 'aE `
+ � F
1
.Vi,.
k` a
�C7i�s4
I t
s..� +..ki r..J. ��r, i . .r .xiL. r. v ti•- ...i !�' - r .. . 1 _

Stnllce Ctruce ---- HMPs Ids Calltrul 1115CCIS - Sile Specific Prarliccs� -
_____ Liquid Syslenis----_---_
F1u511 Gilucls Accumulation ofsolids Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from'
gutters as designed.
Q" Relflove bridging of accllnmlated solids ;1t
discharge _
IAIUOOIIs Auld POS clusled Solids - f-q Maintain lagoons, settling basins and hits whele - — - —
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
cresting cif solicis to a depth of no ninre than 6 -
H inches over more than Jfl:o of surface.
I:i,Ccssivc VC6clalive
i irtlw1Ik- -
• Decaying vebetalioll
Maintain vcgctallvc: coliti'ol along banks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
acciililt Ila[inli of decaying vegetative matter
along; tvaicr's edge on impoll ulluelzl's perilucicr.
Dry Systems
Deed Spillage I DCSi6ll, op4l:ite Will nlctitlluili feed systems (c.li.,
hunkers ;ind lrolrghs) to IIIirlimize Ille
/accuuuilatian of decaying w;lstabc.
Fr cle-aii Itp spill;r6e Irll a rolnill hicsls (e.6., 7 - 10 "
day inlcivat ihlrirll; suninlcr; [5-3{1 day iulu', :11
<lE1f111g iy1111Cr). - - -
Feed Slr,l;tc.c —_—� ACCU1n111a1iuns Of feed resiilecs fy Reduce omislinc accnnullatinn wilhiu illtu! -
arorl) IlliI JE:Ili.IIC lurilrlelei' elf' li:ell sinratIc .
al-C;ls by nlsuliul, Ih;riiiiigc away fiolu silt
- :.- .. Witl/oe plovtdirig a(le<lualc 6111aiiunclil
covered tun: (sir btieweis grails .uul sillul I1 high
.� �. .:,:. f
i , � ,� . css '` s ninlsl'ur4 uI iili �1ludecls)
l - i ' _ f -S - _ R .t _ -Y - - _
[tit Inspc cl fora rLla►nve llr hre tl, tip ;1LLIEII I i11 cl ;
ili lint rr sirl1sI'alurll 41 Ir61 s1lmit;e :Iti ? 3
tr � .'� V- 3til' r'_ Da•' >-cN- ,r •-5 -4 �, s- _;. _
n
� _�� v+- --, -.,• ,�;' � ,� ,y ..ate „ s 1;, -. a �. _.
- -f
� 1 - s' � "`° _'�' - __ n. .?,-' Y X „w . i- -;R.. �r`.rC,r.,= �1 rr a��� +•., �.¢-n3,,'." s, � ka. _.3� �-� r .� -x_� r M1. r s - a. i5.
-',.. r L -. x,:"ti s-• r� `,r �` �c,' ,1�"� ft'�. d -�� v. - i w � '�3� � � ' � ' :s'i �i''.! �-`.'t...� '1`.r' -x'," - "-4 7 -_ e""
s •�.t -h, * :.i r.:.,, T�: .a ,.-r -r'4`" �:-._ ,-.� f �:• - _ � � _ � � .... rT -rti rah �'' `�7,-,�-r'. �=.��, 3:
•'S:rr'4sa-. �' .3F. y-i-�+--' '•�- _.f' M = srr 1 's ''t` a��' a �T'�"x-_ .s-;Y-r."'�` .'�-'vxr''»-. S�� „-_g_,,; '-�r�'y.:.!'. ti ��`�._..,� ,�3 ,' :=4_-.
. a- kr - - - -•r #�_ r [. �'.j.
r-as.
?-h_= d.- -.._ r. a. - - -,r9 --.:2r rn..-��., ,:`$.. C'-••�. •k,,n:Sa...,.�..y;.:ri.•..;,,
u.r. �A1�I Ii -?'I t the 111bei I1` I )Jfi .:`'; ', »i.^t _.::':: "i t-`kb 7+"',..v: ::v- ar 5.2.e •; ��. r:> .,c�:

Suitic4 Cause
T
BNIPS it) Contral 111sectS 51tL' �[�l'i'It1l' i'�;lrliccs
Animal 1 lolding X-teaso Accumulatioris ofunimal wastes
©'
Gliininate low areas Mat trap moisime along
and feet) wastage
fences and ollter locations where waste
accurnulales and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
f,a �Mairitain fence rows and filler-striln :mound
aitiinal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (Le_, inspect for and
remove or break tip accumulated solids as
neLded).
Di y Alauit:e I hildiiiib Accumulalions of animal wastes
n
Remove spillage on a roulitie basis (e.g_, 7 - 10
Systculs
clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
fi
(luring winter) where manure is loadcd for land
fT
application or disposal.
n
Provide for adeiltiate drainage arotnld mamne
Stock -Miles. r
_
F.1
Inspect Cor and remove or break up accumm1ated
•
wastes in filler sirll)s around stockpiles and
In: imi'c handling areas ;Is needed.
For more infortimlion coulact the Cooperative Extension Service, Deparlinent of linloruology, [lox 7613, NoiIh Carolina Siale I nivclsily,
Raleigh. NC. 27695-7613.
And h¢f L°ver!/1/.1 Llf C'`ee
,: = � 'i"a 1 f z��e r " � A , 4``r�", r ra . e _n'T S < ;'�. �,, r 3 - �•,. _ -.
_,� S ° - ii.4 - - "? .��* H � _ -`r c�•{.';t, ram, ��,�j 'f, � ,r"�r » --kr�, : �,�a�� ib y.^`_ �; ?�5
L '�-f •r...N,:; i, �'`"" . SIT
77
`° 5
^i � R � ... d a •_' .. - .G :., ... I - ;_ �v . �- _ 'i� R '".�, ,Er-�• '}S.�i e'T '
AA11� tt,�elither I I, I')')6 1':i1;c 2

v %J.
�'�` f�I /�v� s %r � 9
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Confrol Checklist
I I I It: 0I I IVI-
1-al Ilk
"wilic 11 ilduclinik
:i;
best mallacculcal 111;lclicc5-
and comama sclisc
A mmoi b,ldy :-111
y millillill itC-(:ovciclI im imidli
fL., i NY Otims
Wo IIL;IitIII(;-cqIVL:fd:I1 (ImIls
A, S141111,11 IbIms;
ff--�V-fillulcri locMull Lim sinlicil 11tiols;
high chd ol"Sillid flwwi-,
buildly 11f1III i1mils;
F411.1cipicni 111ilimIL: FC11mvill by 11101. pit jullm gc,
III
F1 I Indcl OtIm VE-jilikiliml
—
Ili:,!. —
w red a(Hilivcs;
cedul citvc
A ICMIMS 14) I'CL:I]L:I. r11,A,-.;II l[jL;j1VL ly dimn:'Jilml L,
lil-AN 1,11A
Agltmimi tIf wcyckil fitgn-Iii'l
li-plid whi IL: lank s it
ill Ileiki Immim I I wills
;III s ill Imil Vullis A-1
M i4 IIt dill il1l; XViIA i; Will L:I',
[ 11 1411A HUM: 1110L With 1111ch:1 vilwilalinn
I iitI(_ ills v,lt
to IL COVCI ti 4-' t
"
i7 ILI611-;IF
-
1% j! Lill I I 111 4 14,1 •i wii tl ill i:l V,k:15, - // - -Jr E
7jq k V C I I
-g, -44 --Q-
4z
7k-j'.
Z 7•L.

1
Fit.1 411 Ili.I1lglip4:i .11 • Al•,liallon tEf iog %Y a-%iewiliet
f-I—Exlelld 1lischill-v c. illlilllli oiiliputi II1111L•IIIL'il1h
t./t;urlu 4:4lIIVCyi111ct;
I}Lo7 a iililllll ICVL:l
;11_Il,nl .III I., 1:, t�ul dill j:as c[uissi+lns;
I'Ifsjlcr lill;noq li11ni1! rljnu:iry;
• 1f111111j;ir.i11 nlil,ln�;
f-'l Collect Lagoon millill(1111ISi:C1I11lCS;
• :11;Na1JOIN
li�•"'Hililllillill silllifl:C ill r:il-lli-Vllllulle lali,; -
-
�
��T Millillllml ilgilatioEl tyhol 1111111y�ping;
i/aclilrioll; N//y
.
r✓ I11Ii V1;11 I1itilo.;ICill iltlllllivus
- I,.Flj;.lEl,lll :.Ill [ill 1,:1 Illl;lk jpC:,-1llle ilt;IGil,flll;
f..t jlli'ilrl; llll dly [1ii 'S with Illlic Ill Im Wilill;
wuttl,: eVin,! el, ill
.
r•�vlillkll111111 1CC11111111C1![Ita! 0110Ei1llllt; 1,1e45111C;
W 1'unl1, i,Yl4l; near lagtuat lillliifi sill bica;
-
,
1'llnll, 1MINI SCL-11IIII-Gli18C lill;flntl
- ._ - - _-------.------------------_-----.._��.n
- '.I,n.I,;.. i.l,ll, ,u. I„1•,In . I'dlllitl IIYiLI,ll,ii111ILCfllllll[,;i llill,l;
I-1 IflliltlllY IYI-lll illll:UCI 1t1:Nlilit�; - - ----__�. __--
Lllf,.l, 1: . tvli7l lllj; lL'i11i1: lillillt;i
l^I •{-illll. Ct1VL•l i,
• Agililliun when clnloying
C1 liasin sill {act: uln,s of solids;
f I 1',f,vctl hiulnt;if:ill i1111lilives or uxillilnts
Pill tia l,It E..l 01641 dLI;U 1I1jlW;ijitln:
+' 1:x,Lntl lltallslHjtt: 11111IG15111n11:I Ilttalli llltll111 --------•-.----- -- •... ._._ _ ._. .. .
it It, 1Yll Ile 1111nitjl -
1GVCl;
- Aj;Ellllimi wl,ell ellljllyilig
1-1 liclnnvc scillcif snlills r,a;tljil;ly,
•�
- t.l nuns. :.11ll,j' n1 :.lu+ll;e:_ A1;11:1Eittn ivllell sillL:iYllirlt;; - . "
(� SlidIYIita:Elnn ill N1Wly/::lnllgcs;
,1nY.,nl.1-I,ull�-I: t1,11:1tlle 111s IaWSsiillk5 -
-
-• - - - _ - ..
mallklIC tilnll Stl[L'illlljl ifliCl IESI:; ._ .
/r-lIeSlttllill
- .
I' l i Ci ! ills t uai lilnl' �v/�
1 1 i,lvl.) tl ulnl,ll.,l in livl.II 1 ".-•
. �•- -•. i ill. 1„, I.,.1 Ili-III�iI ,:• -_ . ,�nlillil,: 'l5 C1111iiIllnS „-ll ill: -
- --- -- -------- ,-- .-------'—•- - -.... -•- -` -.-. - --'
�l :;tliI IIkjLcl ioll 111 Aill I ) i:,111d c s -
' - .. :Ilu� •; In �.IiI.II:,: Ynl II, GI -- ,11 )'Itl,j;
uunittnlit,inn ,villtin •iti ltrs.;
,nil
llil•tllllilllllllllllitlllIll la)'tE fill „1ljNelfifylElt
lt::{,-i111!llll Vl::'. t I� ✓� rt--
1
I ! I 1,s
11�'�:.L.
:, •`-` !. 1�_
✓
1� _ f. .:{ - 'I
�' �. ".---•..., Gr,. ,.r_•: � -: i � �
fl f tl 1!1 �tiv1 f xY �•F � �:
il,jll Ilnt 11 t,I:ail::r.:;.l:'iJutlliliial'l,l _ - ,•�: - -
] 4
_
-
`7 tI,1' f µ -'�_ �.',
y:
r
1 1l: 1 !•�.- I1 /' �,.a..4 ."3 X I � "i
"-
i/ fll I/l. i.it l-1- - 1141.I,I�ItI }1 il�inllu Jilin-
11.. L J f `• - — _;i - —
Il.�a nt1.1t l„u ill I = ,
�l:Irt;T
r
w L �-��- � -5 ._.+ �1��i7 Y' i3 -.J�
y.tie9
Z. '^ r.t,
] .i ��' _ y,3i. kc a
� Y ��# �,.- �.}'i 4 P 9
-J f` t ✓ i.
,a � �J ] �y � U - �• �� l,, v_ i�v 4-
Y.+s �-r�I 3'` t. �.% � 1
- r .§ yY- .t S-,.
' -:-_ - �._--..i:; 2= 1-*. - t.�- �� ^ds t Sai 1•+€.- r r x "::Ft7 nFf -.=i.
;.,.,_.�. :�r,I It y^li ,III i.i .I rrl~l':I:l..•t: j,.:,> -,Y3 ., 'J Sri
1 "'Y •.:ig..M
'} l i� N �t.� 'n' 4 •:x°' '•f 4V14 �$�: i. „` $;'� yf t�`..;'SF; .. �..
y9 T �Y �t .�L.. •1 Fi.. � �.� �. �� �
„�
'd�a. A 1 -� '•4 +t.'P P.•.y�y �.--- .vim-ai•u n, .-_.� �.�!: � �,Y _b6.. ,. LI•���:.1�' Y�
2• Y.- � � � -,ray .'y+� �y � Q .w.. V_.' i� - � 1 .
! f ;h�i-. 'V '� 3' P '!y .Y•Ri+1 F � L
iL<'' J N c'4 .. I '• ,y. _ 13 i-i "CS
_ .7 1 _�E_v_ ✓ _ f. _
- , 1 � �
1 �„ +�- r.�, A,
-
�IS � i.,1 ,': - �-��� *y i. `i- IFS~+i�.°"Y-5' r ��r4'� tJ t? f - - •�Y��� i� � 1-6`i

HNIN in Minimize 011or
r-K (it jisift; Will 141111SCillIC SlIC11 Illill Wilt l 11ii1il1S
Hit:11111i;I1 i lut'CIIIIlkwitioll tit'
tip IIIiILlCI_
• 'I I I it I y I I I it it I( a it I L: I I ucrcss I I lilt
Silt: SlIvrific PI ;Ickccs
A.11111 MI'd hltwm.molt
AVilijid)JL'.
PI I IMI I :,11 III Vill t:111iiii tIIll11 Simi L;cs an I I It o tic I I it: I 1A 1: Fiici Shecl
IIAI:
..%VI41.,: ho-11i, ii-lit I it -LIIIIII u Momagcoictit: Vil It cdjili g kigomi ']'I calowil
- -lilty t FBAF V U-88
111A 1:
1'All.111L.JILM kj.ljjjlit; j.JiM!IjCtj)LIIj; 1111t1t:11111,01 F111A F.
IIA I-'
•
I .11;41IJIJ I Wilij! , it'1111LI 1_0(tick
1 lAvcick I'dilIMIL 'I'lCililliClif illl(l SlOjiigt; -1 FBAF 101-113
If 'S i I - I 1A F
j'j.L1IItId'L'. ICILI kVlI:.lj.,kvaIej Applicollion Filoilmwnt FIIAF' Faci SbctA
I - IIAV'
I 'I neittEx s A s sm;
I.mit-1 1 CIMI 1-1 I'M dic 01101 1:91ILL:
N CS I J Agii
1, J it it is cl I I c I if t toi S at 14 1 J:j jL_L 1. 't it 1 1: 1 t:jt I: C Ill I it: L:(I,l 11 vs
Hol ith Coopelillivi; F\lt:lp:jmt
T
Y
?
-7
Z. k,
n,
-4,
I. n

RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
WASTE. UTILIZATION PLAN
SEP 2 098
�:67�i36+1'r`
+owner 5'4{ name r , Q ' FA rrri S _ C -- Count fiM rh8rga Pam}itUng
`�tr rMailk Aaddress
" Ty,peiaf,`production unit- T:�,7c4'8d_-Ssucnr %�oApii�r �Fre/
par r Type'of� waste facility- �&,2(_-re�ic
S" 1'Your 'an�ma'1 r was•te ; management.:'fac i 1 i.ty ' has been designed for a
gi'.ven"4stor,a e,'rca acit a' -When the was-te reaches the designed
� .r;� �-,f - ,t : 9 .- P Y � �3
v � �M 1ev6A,,.int _must ,be �landa applied at a specified rate to prevent
`ep � � Apo l lutfi on: -of :.surface, and/ar 'ground water. The plant nutrients
,W�r ti,n ttie anixmal .waste should' be used to reduce the amount of
0 µ ,acomme1r.c i.41,-'tfert i l Lzer required for the craps on the fields' ;-
.,yrw,heneQthe{was te,,,.is-to be'applied. This waste utilization plan
t 'spa',,: Muses'nirog'en':,as..the,'limiting nutrient. 'Waste should be
Qr, anal..yzed:,'.be,fare,'.each application cycle and annual soi.1 ,tests
-e'ndour'aged'°so' 'that :all plant nutrients can be balanced for
► r,ealisticr'yields"af'the-crop to be grown,
Several factors are :impartant in implementing -your waste
f•"rr�'u,tiliz`atio,n 'plan,.in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
i{,the waste;+and:, to ensure• that it is applied in an
environmental_ ly safe• -manner. Always apply' waste based on the
eds,of'the crop to, be grown and 'the nutrient content of the
waste: Do,not .apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
ypes`,+are '"important as they have different infiltration
it t'F� :•ur r'aces,'�andr'#-1each ing,'-potentia1. Waste shall not be applied to
eland`ero"ding at'greater Lthan 5 tons per acre per year. Do not,
appa-ydrwas;te�'ons •saturated: ;soils or on land. when the surface is
-;,'��" frozers� Either `ofthese=conditions may, result in runoff to .,.•
surface,,.waters`. Wind`; conditions should also be considered to
avoid1,� Ift .and downwind odor problems. To maximize 'the value
,,`,jy; r of>nuts.ients':f.arl`crap. production and to reduce the potential '
,�o,", fora pol•le 3O days
utio,n, the,•waste'•should be -applied to a growing Crap or
=dS tot"'morthan':•,pr.ior to planting.. Injecting the 'waste
on°disking will' "conserve _nutrients .and reduce odor problems.
acreis`tneeded ',to'apply' the animal waste is based on typical
•'?Si,'1✓i:-r.•;:Sl;S'�.'.�•t�S'FJ %" a .A:
Hutt,1,ent.,'conten t.'for'this'type of facility, Acreage
F'4x�,d,requ•.,r.ements:' may be. more or less based on the waste analysis {'
�rreporst', room . -your waste.,management facility.
T �F 9
r �;{� � ��..Y ,xy,diSL,d �� e, rs �sr• .-^ . r .•. ;� ,'•' -
' ;, ,, Thetgr► `desiof youwaste- management facility is fused on the
r your.,waste.
110 w-i'ng
k d��ii!%� y jxL4�1;'s-J' �' 35 � 7i xE .ae • "r V ; ..
r.Amounti' of°waste Produced Per Year: i
animals x tons `waste/animal/yr=Z tans
10�.,. S k rv�,�r' �vK; s' .t+ total waste
-'} ",y, rat' kk �i Sn r y yr• - • . _

vai Iab,le. Nitrogen
rM
Produced, Per' Year:
Y -
i
�!';I B(�; anima'ls x "' 23 °"lbs.. N/animal/year•
��
lbs./yr
Avai lable N
AptiapVying�'i the±-„abave 'amount *,of waste
is a big' job.
You should
,Y p,ln time -�and'''have'•app.ropriate equipment
to, apply
the waste in
' �a 'ti. meiy°manner, ' `Your,`facili y is
designed for.
Ieo ,days of
: as tor.`age if. Tkker.e.fore, it wi.11 need
to. be.; pumped every 6' .
's'FxeId Soil -Crop Yield
Lbs. N -Acres
Lbs. N Month to
.•Tract
`No i*`' 'No,.".. Type
Per 'Ac.
Used Apply
I
IMP---M
NECRIAWMM
ME
M--MM
M.
M_
M.
MI,
M
"m
X-1-mmum-
ys�kTi r;,y -
ar=rati;ve ,of, Operation:
3 ihli ";
I r
E'' n IA/(J1'n� rf'r111
F^L k
Total S
Available'Nitrogen �6 Z
Surplus Or Deficit z Zy
�1L_csJas Ja Tl�� a_ %iaA le e4 a42I11n�fAo�iA�n
r,Ca1k,1,th.e So-i l and. Water`.Conservation District- Office after you
=='bi;,receive,,waste'°analysis- rep,o,rt .to obtain the amount per acre to
pplyandtthe irrigation .application rat prior to applying
aste'' b
�.,rPrepared, sty.':
' •.: t R�ri. +;r1 ° Sr. - ° ., i., 4. Title Date. .
*1Cbncrurred in by.
h P aducer Date
(Copy
to+•,producer and copy to case file)
r'

ATTACHMENT B
:.A, _Mhff'a__nagement
"p-Was-te gn,
'North Carolina State Univers'
and Agricultural ...
Biologibil an gricultural Engineering Ity
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAHPLING,- ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAHPLE; COLLECTION
!A.',;Semi-Solid ­Lot,Hanure-
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a.. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
"j different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from,under.the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
�B.t'.Liquid Manure' Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a., Extend a 1/,2"__nonmecallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit,. floor.
b. Seal .,.
'-upper b. conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
.';,,,of conduit), trapping, manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
-d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii,_, Exterior scorage-basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump -or propeller a&Ltacor.
b. Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations,
from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
Professor and Extension Specialist. Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Deparcment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh. !;C.
I of 3

4' '• 'N 'L A 51il w'R-. � :'4 i�q ,'' i ! r1 a 4<• ' 1
"
ATTACHMEN l li
F
it
s
of 3
xF," 1'''y-•xi v;:. Y F u.b•,n�r ?r, . s•,.. ,+, ,rr us� wr''y
.. . - h
r r
,
,� �.
} ft n
,s
4-w
z '�
1 � Hix- and+add 3/4 pint to; a
nonmetallic, sample --container,
F
t": -w FwM ,�, +.1 a i• - ��. '^ 4 Mrt•d 3�'. - hiis; ".i"
�f-� t., ,t-.`..?;
., % -
�
C Lagoon ,Liquid .. ;
�, ,:.��� `' � w: tw,.$F+a :;� ;� �', r� '_-;,mt.� Mi•.Y u � 4 ii*i .�r !
� , i s.: w I ;,r� l a�'r,V 41` : `y` : .. r`• "�-:'y',:. a; y. vq. ;.m(4,+er: � A - �r .r" ,.. .. .. ... - ..
follrect;abouct pint of Lagoon liquid from inflow pipe '-
f°eta flush canks`,in' a•nonmecallic -sample; container.
","•�P' ,t �' i'i *From lago on '
fiF';s�a:SrElacea snall'rbottle',~('1/2 pint oz less)-'on;end of'10-15' pole.
PY�b Excend bottle` 10 15'� away from bank edge.
rT
r:.,� c Brush away, floating' scum or debris.
�I":µn. ! t v6��4 .�''ks re�� 2.,"a .. rJ ,• ,� t4, '.i-
'' of• liquid surface.'- g i 1'i d '' Submer e::boCtle whin t
Empty •,inco,'a,.plastic' bucket, repeat about 5­times 'around
5�i'YMagoon; mix, •andladd 3/4 pint to nonmetallic, sample container.
x ,ffr:"r`*1j.
*t�tryyl , 0: D »� Broiler � or Turkey Litcer
r<tj xh, r..,'i �i0usC°'liCt0rj4 �, •I_ , ,t r .: �-. � r � 1 ..
P ° a `� Visually inspect`Iitcer for areas ,of varying quality, e.g.,
, rvl ' > �;:•areas'.around. Afeeders and waterers, • and estimate percent .of
rAl a P �w •► floor surface ''irO" ach'area 1`
.art' � 7',� 4TA,5,'`. ,r a�.� r�1�'+«,r7 � �,;r� r:rd r. ,j :(. t„1�,• _ ,� f.+� t "A; , - ,j'..:i t , F . �� 5 ,.
b,.F Take'Fabouc }. litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
';,•rN.r ,h °i%i ` �:.< itetn'a., .E.g., if'20tof litter of similar'`visual'•quality' is`
� 'H. ��� }� ; '. ' • ,,•;'around' feeders',and,,.waterers. take 1 subsample there and the
{ lYS+ I :1 '.other 4 subsamples from remainder lof floor surface.
f� -'c '•Ae�eachff.locat:iori;-, callecc litcer*frora a'6" by 6" area down to
. earth' floor; and'yplace in a plastic bucket.
�d, After t5�subsamples have been'.added to the buckeC,' mix, and add
' `�"Y r ' abociC •2.3'lbs``li'tter'_`to a nonmetall ic)'sample container such as
ail'=gallon freczerAbag and' seal
'f`Fromstockpile <� '.''a'" j_
' Y ;
RF•'rt ' "r ' { �# rr x r .
rs, , a,; Take''Isubsamples from about; 5�'locations at least 1$" into pile.
b, Kix, add 2.3 -lbs to; nonmetallic 'sample' container and seal.
st,
<YA1 _ � M i* r '%' 1 .. i'_"'•''>-�,.� .. ".'' •:�' , t 'y . �' : L.- y � , tr,�, ! .{ '
-
���
ii,f''r t� '�' � �_ "� � - r v'gt3 ^ 3r:. :4rYr t''r.r S• .. f + y"1 1 '

`PREPARATION
.11.
SAHPLE AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
"
residues, from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
:soaps, or treat in any other way.
B' Pack'sample"in ice. refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
_C.'Hand-delivery'is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
"
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper,, and tape.
E.-Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. AbL Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
`" 7621'White'pine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
r
Richmond,'VA 23237 Wheeling. IL 60090
.`Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. 'Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
•.3315 Winton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
�V;.r.; �„ ,. ''• Raleigh; NC ' 27604 Fort Atkinson; WI 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
- �...r;.
`
. F' Pivatal analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
e an r
Y P Y Y•
C.'The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
`"
Iy'
Agronomic Division
Plant/L7aste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
i_
P.O. Box 27647
'NC
Raleigh, 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
Siii.'Include
the following identification information with sample:
;a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
..,,,
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower. number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
R°�'"
c. Waste t e'(dair lot scraped manure liquid slurry; swine- it
slurry, lagoon.liquid; sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
'
iv. 'Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P. K. Ca, Mg, Na,
.�. Fe, Hn, Zn, Cu, B
S
x,
v.'Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, 11o, Cd. Ni. Pb
3 of 3

k '
r=to Abe Tsed;for Land Owned by Someone Other Than Producer1.
have agreed to allow.,...'.,,' '
to apply animal. waste on the Lollowing '
'vestock- Producer "
fields�on'-,tract(s); number(s) '
At
t� -tJ�+r�'j -'s.lA t - t * 1 •' / - •�6 /�.: /, I eAf"/! Q7.. , • i �f '1 c:
h�`;'�i-1,�cd'Yrt�'�f Ptiy�7i5� r{-' s + 2 r ":{' 2'�1 t'y ♦'� -' 4 '.+ JS r'`
i t r r 2 +- i
' , F }„� Crop ;' Acres- ;
•'Ir � �' '•'�'}'r� �,f�� r� f�.,,i�`�' IVl,�1 � L i �T t � 2c r > r i�f L'r= r'�r � f 'i � 1 ;� is `��t:��:'��,i'':f 4.-• .
%
MS _ ,, y J �' - " <•f r ,.,yr. [ y� V
r� Y ''x �%`�' ••irb k -
% J _ J r 2.. i1 iT.�'•a,h, 1 f �1. '.L -Sil' ! Kl Y. 2J % C -f 1 L n� S H ��r 'i � kl i •+' �,5 '� ;�,'1 K I rf�' L
y Jj v Y //']�� 1 d,.�Y //I/�}�.L � {' 4- 1•� '�i !. N;r li i' r yea
[f u , , . t Crop Acres,'r')�' " r
�'� � ��i r �t � 7�437 0 " , i. !'2 � ;t h �r' + i+, � y ,.� i' i✓ - ;' p 4<rr��� � �� n`',1;A ' a
! f-,d } 4j i!.
Field aP ZF.16
cAr
4135/0 f� Jy
,
..
' i - w' i -f s it ' G �' t ••i r ti .. .
� ' :i.,• r L r ' �•' � .; f r ri r r 5 '1 t r r : r
�4N� ,F�,eld,'� r", " •`/-�LScu� _ ' ' •-L'�.t3'a' � '.�•
{Y4�}-, f 'Crop
Acres. z
X' understand • this permission is granted for .^a- minimum of 20 years
1,71
. •. 9� - '
andawner Date
'T'�3�f4 F.efd' "]
-
t
.., ' fir,,`,;�'�• ,- �: I ��
orh � �1h1a/r U-rc[f•�
59- cc
,S-qAc�.

recycling
a. overall pump operation
b. leaks
C. loose fittings
5. Surface water diversion
a. adequate vegetation
b. diversion capacity
c. ridge berm height
B. operation
irrigation pumps
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a
P14f.5 v total of /, dCO __ sows/animals ( to
J 1 The lagoon contains both permanent and temporary storage.
1�erJlr7retPenb The permanent storage is not to be pumped in order to ensure
lI that anaerobic action will occur. The design storage
includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes
capacity for the volume of waste produced over 180 days, the
amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event plus an
additional "heavy rain" factor; and rainfall in excess of
evaporation. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
temporary storage; therefore, it will need to be pumped
every six months. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid
level reaches elevation ,e5:3�7 as marked by permanent
markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches
elevation 3; L: Pumping can be started or stopped at any
time between these two elevations for operating convenience
as site conditions permit, such as weather, soils, crop, and
equipment in order to apply waste without runoff or
leaching.
The attached waste management plan must be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see
Attachment B) before land application. The waste material
should be analyzed before each application cycle to
determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the area of
application should be made annually to insure the waste is
applied as reasonably and practically possible to
recommended rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be precharged with a volume of
water equal to one-half of the treatment volume before
wastes are introduced. Precharging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon
thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
2

Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush
water and irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below
the surface and as far from the inlet pipes as possible in
order to provide a cleaner effluent for flushing and to
reduce odors when irrigating on land. When these pipes are
placed through the embankment, they should be -installed no
more than two feet below top of dike and not in the highest
section of fill. The pipe trench should be compacted with
clay material.
After five years the waste treatment lagoon must be checked
for sludge accumulation annually. If sludge has encroached
into the treatment volume, the sludge must be removed and
applied at agronomic rates based on analysis of the sludge.
Treatment volume must have a minimum of 4 feet of depth free
of sludge at all times.
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) in North Carolina revised water quality regulations
that address animal operations. These rules became
effective on February 1, 1993 (15A NCAC 2H .0200). This
animal operation shall be operated within the requirements
of these rules and regulations.
M

'f�tl�....r .. �j��.� S'`iY- / L��►9e ��yad,� .'. r_.. • Yolan��. AS l� ry�>
— /L "L)'t GCS .4
� on o nson
THE FOLLOWING
COMMANDS ARE
Dist. nearest residence (other than owner)==> 2000 AVAILABLE FROM
Sows (farrow to finish)=======-----=========> ANYWHERE IN
Sows (farrow to feeder)===============--====> 1600 THE PROGRAM:
Head (finishing)===•=========================>
Sows (farrow to wean)=======================> TO PRIN DESIGN:
Head ( wean to f eeder)=======================> \ z z
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu.ft.)=-=>
Treatment Volume (min, 1 cu. ft. per lb.)===>
1.0 TO
GLEAR DESIGN:
Inside top length===== =====================>
494
\cd
vLf7 w/,4 Acnco-1117/
Inside top
Top of dike at elevation=====_______________>
47.00 ;TO
QUIT
W/O SAVE
Freeboard===================================>
`_.1..0
\q
Side Slopes=================================>
2.5
25 year - 24 hour rainfall=========_ =======>
6.8 TO
GOTO
SEEDING:
Bottom of lagoon at elevation===============>
35.30
\sr
Total required volume==============> 1207815
Total design volume available=•-====> 13095521
TO
PRINT
SPECS:
Design end pumping elevation==========_ ====>
/�...-"
43.20v
\pc
Min. required treatment volume=====> 835200
Trmt. vol. at end pumping avail.===> 926220--
TO
PRINT
0 & M:
Design start pumping elev.=========-------==>
45.30✓
\po
Min. required perm. + temp. volume=> 1210896
Design vol. at start pumping avail.> 1226692
TO
GOTO
WASTE U:
Seasonal high water table elevation=========>
41.70
\wu
NOTE! Verify that temporary storage is adequate:
Min. required temporary volume=====> 372615
Design temp. vol. avail============> 383332
! 1 i
e-. //i S is :tina.I a; cea
1?7CA,J4j,o rn*wr< _ :� sec C f G P4 I c r , / ! 77;tea•�1 sm, �✓I
• L!
i5 u�r7s �'a�U��t3 4-0�
O/Q
y
-,1
/X.,
7'� Glr�G1 /%Prr
RECEIVED
WATER OUALITY SECTION
JUN , i 199Q
Non -Discharge Permitting

Producer: ^ ge'_7b, �_ _ &"-'e oUC f%%sS��rsi// 7�%l% :SGcl iil e.
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. flood
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and
side slopes: i_' O"nlnee Berrn�t wa ra.s�_ _ is
being established on these area Beginning in 19� and
each year thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized
with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least monthly. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes
a. separation of -joints
b. cracks or breaks
C. accumulation of salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2. Lagoon surface
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking
b. side slope stability
c. wet or damp areas on
d. erosion due to lack
wave action
e. rodent damage
or "jug" holes
- slumps or bulges
the back slope
of vegetation or as
a result of
1

ON AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------
for waste treatment with minimum odor
sired for the planned fluid level to be
soil conditions,flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
R. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land -application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 1.- as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump --out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 20 or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria)
i
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
} 7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the respon=_ibility for enforcing this law.

//,Ol A odw
Operator===========- ---------------------- ==>J AND M
County=================_ ===== =============>Johnston THE FOLLOWING
Date========================================>04/19/96 COMMANDS ARE
Dist. nearest residence (other than owner)==>
1600 AVAILABLE FROM
Sows (farrow to finish)=====================>
ANYWHERE IN
Sows (farrow to feeder)=====================>
0 THE PROGRAM:
Head (finishing)============================>
489
Sows (farrow to wean)=======================>
TO PRIN DESIGN:
Head (wean to feeder)=======================>
\pd
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu.ft.)===>
0
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft. per lb.)===>
1 TO CLEAR DESIGN:
Inside top length========================_ =>
200 \cd =
Inside top width============================>
100
Top of dike at elevation====================>TO QUIT W/O SAVE
Freeboard ==================================>
1.0 \q
.Side Slopes=================================>
3.0
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================>
6.8 TO GOTO SEEDING:
Bottom of lagoon at elevation===============>3s.7034 .7-o. \sr
Total required volume==============> 105175
Total design volume available======> 107960
TO PRINT SPECS:
Design end pumping elevation================>\pC
Min. required treatment volume=====> 66015
Trmt. vol. at end pumping avail.===> 67582
TO PRINT O & M:
Design start pumping elev.==================> #8
\po
Min. required perm. + temp. volume=> 95614
Design vol. at start pumping avail.> 96627
TO GOTO WASTE U:
Seasonal high water table elevation=========> ys844 80\wu
NOTE!'Verify that temporary storage is adequate:
Min. required temporary volume=====> 39160
Design temp. vol. avail============> 40378
�E�S SYp,NDAftDS,AND S � CIF CAS
PRAC110E

ZSo �,q%%oy W""' - —/V d 64' SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
---------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
- 1I'he—designed—temporary storage consists of 180 days —storage --for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching..
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage, .to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary sto acre pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation was marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation G. This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains cubic feet or
gallons.

"'•• i -� 'd ,•r is pya •' fi r,0�;'�lR�i'' (1;rr�; ��} ,:, ''[. ti ff. ._ ,y ..-• �; Lr •-K'''�..
rY ' � ''� •�r�y ', � t�tiIri�`j r;,,;,I •,�4t�-f,y�:.�a;,�,.f{RI.�t•*! ,7 � r �i �'J:_ '#�I�� �y'r -
" o: ',, M� � c: �:r-� ':J O' � pfl. �:;I•� (+yam y � ^..ry p� �;1�� �r1iR r '' ���• "-..F.`�._...�j'��;i�r�W:-. � .��F.`r �..;:
fn ,f11 m � � G f �p�'•' li' �.�' t ! ��f �f 'lr r' � ..r'rr,�r'
S - Ail fi"i V) - - •ram if •.�1�-.. - �' a ��i�lrl 1 !.��ti �.`��1 d•. d it UI ��'�.E=i':�r{�o. �..
r, t � ` 1; •. � `l � �F..11� ,4�1�+?��Sd�y� _ _ - �I r. s' �� { _ - �'_ � f' f - � •'FCJ n� �:Z�
i;r 3J ) an&t. `�l ir;J• J. '' !(jl ?�. : 7.. f 't' t 4 CA i
Fit
t.� �, r i ��5 t f1. �r �Ttt it'•}".� i� �7 .�4-. rI ' a x.L l \ �_'—m.v
1 l _ � r.':sl �'r11�yy 1 i 'yl�'yY--j." •m,�e. l� r�,�, ' i �� f
�i`i.` ` j _ 1 .� _^-Ilk k ,�pjlflt{j��•r�7+���1: I tY � �•'.•'`� �/),y�.�ti S(' � � '� f.T F "•Y
ll RF' �• ? V�, A! j�, s`[] • P I`1ar,r 1�p' •�"fH/. !, i 1$ i. L ,rxl { Ikl-. ram-,
•1'� .•f .I •f� 1 �I li't'` 7�1i �T���j!��!•,�y•/�.1 is O A Z Rr' w` 4 l�, �' 3
rt,C�i ..•r�^ �' -'i% f,� S : A lyp , ]�17�•� _ ..i ' Y a ' r .1 r'`
'tx; •.rer�} •? p�rr �l:': •���"1 'i��r � y wiy'f ,• �- .r 'r s�,,f:1�~r .L
4✓!S£,�`_;.,11Nd.�� i u FTjir.;4'� I f w..•Rt'"'�.f,r „1 '- '�• � -`� '� •)' � '�.'{�is'r•r+ . f ilt
'l � �".5j'' Y` r a •�i� .v,'• � �� a' ,,,r2 .lr��i� 4.$ F F..4f• ,,��y�1'r•.•;'• ���'�`3� S1l"�i`+C`± � � .� '!
Qj
�� ���++ 4'� �'�i *� "� �r f1Z �-• ��i r o. 'i.� � t:, • ( .ni ��rt.i��. r•��ti - �1� ,r. Y cf•ri
;`' e I4+, t _r #,fF 1 s �J ?k $ iiJ efr' to-3 I y �� -: r��•
}�� � F'�� � � v �'}�°r -?►,� r�.` 7� ':y(I'•��"�1 � q� { `��� �'�r�?�� f �' " 'v' � � ��ti i"t' - . •
l �' ;xv I r• 43 �,, h,•;. �" 1 t .. Ir'lA! V� i ' .1i•i f .;'. s
r1
9r;y s �•�
Il � } � ih . y f 'h''�.•' ��� ♦)J t t� '-�:.•"'1'��'-
il' •� r. - k \ + -:' a 1'•'titArrrf-.t rt - t --�-r-- c't�"•a'.tT r".`^
4. :I r.}k J:.
1_
l4n
t� .r F - L.#/} 7n•kr:W lr^r:.r nX�.,t. '(I
1. �'�• r.l » � �~: - ,' sr � •k � � J �'r � S,•Y-t��t��•.a �l t t � ��> .
� � �-I ��`y t�;�y�'J� �•'•1 ��lC �fl+ � ��:.�•iti�:t,•.•:
• n •�[.jrt l' .'fj'. c� j �' ram• ,sue ,�•+} ` v. s'•�� r.
Sal ,fff �;c; 3y�', r'n �t r •� r�
'� • yi> ?.�1 fs•M 'li! iy'iJ7r%.�Z�._r.f,-z
L" {_.^.p'�._r
��� - 1f'ri'H7' �4' �• _' I'•)_ �'�'•_. r.,� rt„ ,�•''pp,a,� P, --� '�: 5'.af:�ti"�; -ti (�r r �c irt:yT�
ji��' • ,1• tiL:� w ti - .- '` � F,�ye: ' ..AL ,f .a .'��-"r F.'- . � I�'+`(.�y Hill -a J4.
•yy -�[ .� i,�r .1 `' f�! �%�� �� �7�}� � }-�i':.: '� :1'.rK �,....,,•-*{f.�-R�� i.r �r�fE. li�i�.ri� t�tl y�)' .
,�. � "c '~r � �' q y; ,y ,jy�,c' txy„'� ,a',�l���:c{�•>. �r t ,t � � t •:v ti..,,ir�.r• ,lrrl ; ;r;�,
,Y e,�..•_.•;I,k:,r1 �6t:� .,,.:,(.4i,i'Lir aE't '",
M •p� '3 R "t �'ti 'i J _ •'x r ,ck �r' � •� - a' -iv 1r Y- tl r �jfwl � �l �'•[ _..
.�C 4 it •. �1rtI.; ',�y�� IF � � pt, � • 4�J�r, � � .pf�� � �i '4 h � r.��it.� !ri _�. t��� � i`�t� i�� ",i.tc; �r �'
sv. i' =!J S �11w (�:b:' #itt� �c�•tr 1� .r�Jr rt rc+3%,f�w� J_l�r'il l,i��i4d(l_I�y
` "�S r: t r art?_- w k
}�` •�•N-.\. r rs � 'Jt�: �-'�Y71� F r a+" 1rsJf; ..�� j��c,•aJ;Y�,II�•�,
- �
�r.. ..i - ! " j.i,�t _ � � V�.�'•.. �_i; �•�.. �M,r2Qsrf�;,t� +,
huil
�.�
� rY l: r' � 7 . f�`, !r' -; j7i •'i �a �a.• f � ♦ -
F.•
•l J � f �'
ti .� � �,t' , �j .� _� W ;, N r�t its ; � c- ` - '� �r�►r r'F�
• �t. IT ;,� �.(f•f 1 fr-yl -., 1 1tl,+y �.n� � a•12-1 1 � la
t. r'7 � it f� 1,_ _ -1 I , �+,�JR �I?''-� �- ;�,' Ir• i';+(i
Z
1p
r `v .r
rs
rY�I'F}ay;L�r iJ;!;#v�lAl
� 115 "'r� an_.-•�.af-�;(� l J' n_•y-
r
z

LT 1/04) --!.,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: J AND M HOG FARM INC. VVAjjREGSlEi
Location: 5110 STRICKLAND CROSS ROADS ROAD Rf
FOUR OAKS NC 27524 �U� o31yQ?
Telephone: [phone] �Jo�,pscl,u^
- rge
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2880.00 hogs/
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required -for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but ,less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated• soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 4;
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, f%t3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tonsV
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 662VIbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
--
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
300
7 17
4340
3,4
GeB
BH
6
0
2151
I
APR .VEP .
cr -
4340 I-3,4 I ISG 11 150 10 17.17 1358.5
S E P VX4.
Pink
I
TOTAL12509.5
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ,
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LB5
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
20
4. 32
4340
1
GoA
C
125.;0
136. 5
588.6
t
I�
MAR-JUN
4340 I-1 / 1GoA
4340 ^-1 i GoA
JAPR.AUG.
4340 2 GoA
4340 -2 �- GoA
4340 -2 GoA
JAPR.AUG.
4340 6 GeB
4340 --6 �. GeB
ISEP.APR.
4340 -6 ..GeB
IAPR.AUG.
4340 8 GeB
4340 --8 GeB
ISEP.APR.
�A T/ d y
SB 135 / 1140/ 0
C 112PI 136�" 2
W 60. 144 0
SB 35 140/ 10
4.32 �622.08
FEB-MAR
0 77 Y
4.32 1604.8
1.�9 1257.512
MAR-JUN
1.89 1272.16
FEB--MAR
1.89 1264.6
C E75.073.75'120/ 13 ✓ 1221.25
MAR-JUN
W 140/ 196 V/ 0 3 1288
y z, �z
SB 28�/ 112 0 3 336
C 175.0/I73.7/ 121
W 140 196 10
8 Y 1630.562
MAR-JUN
8.55 18H.8
1;20 y, y8
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
4340
APR. AUG.
1-8
jGeB
5673
�SEP.APR.
2A
GeB
4589
5
j.GoA
4589
-5
GoA
455
4589 1-5 1GoA
APR. AUG.
5435 3 GoA
5435 -3 1GoA
--3 I UoA
APR. AUG.
4455 2
4455
GoA
GoA
4455 1-2 jGoA
�APR .AUG.
END
SB 128 / 1112 / 10
FP 1 3.2 1160/ I 0
8.55 1957.6
3.78 1604.8
C 125,r0
1 136.' 5
20�
14�1
1641.737
MAR-JUN
W 60.4
144
0
4.71
678.24
FEB-MAR
FEB-MAR
SB 35 140 0 4.71 1659.4
C 1U.0 136.25 20 / 25 1351.525
v �/ .MAR-JUN
W 6 1144 ;' 0 2.58 1371.52
n}� I I FEB-MAR
L' Ike eL
SB 135 j 114CV0 12.58 1361.2
v r
IC 1 125 0 136125 20,/(/ 7.11 11036.86
MAR-JUN
W 160.�0 144 0 17.61 11095.84
v FEB--MAR
cr c l 11
SB 35, / 1140 0 17.61 11065.4
TOTALk13408.7
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially. -late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
r
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHEL
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
ACRES
l
7 17
36.44
43.61
LBS AW N USED
2509.5
kc
*** BALANCE 23L j -_
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5328
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 17.76 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 42.624 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I
Tract
I
I Field I
Soil Type
4340 I
1 I
GOA
I
4340 12
I
GOA
I
4340 13,4
i
I
GeB
I
4340 16
I
GeB
I
4340 18
I
GeB
I
4340 I
--1 I
GOA
I
4340 I
I
--1 I
GoA
�
4340 I
I
--2 I
GOA
I
4340 I
-2
GoA
I
4340
-3,4
IAPplication RatelApplic. Amount
I Crop I (in/hr) I (inches)
1
C I .35 I *.50
I I I
C I .35 I *.50
I
I BH I .35 / *.50
I I �
C I .35 I *.50
I I
C I .35 I *.50
I I 1
SB .35 I *.50
I W I .35 I *.50
I
I SB I .35 I *.50
I I i
W I .35 I *.50
I I 1
SG .35 I *.50
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
4340
1 -6
1 GeB
1
I SB
1
! .35
1
I *.50
4340
I
I -6
I
! GeB
I
I W
I
1 .35
I *.50
4340
I -8
I GeB
I SB
I .35
! *.50
4340
I
I -8
I
I GeB
1
I W
f
I .35
I
I *.50
4455
1
1 2
I
GOA
I
1 C
f
i .35
I *.50
4455
I --2
I GOA
I SB
! .35
I *.50
4455
I
1 -2
I
I GOA
I
I W
i
I .35
I *.50
4589
1 5
!
i GOA
!
i C
I .35
I *.50
4589
1
1 -5
i
I GOA
I
1 SB
i
I .35
I *.50
4589
f
I -5
!
I GOA
!
I W
I
I .35
I
I *.50
4589
!
I -5
I
1 GOA
I
I W
I .35
I *.50
5435
I
1 3
I
I
I GOA
I
i
I C
I
I
f .35
1
I
I *.50
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5435
i V3
GOA
I SB
I .35
I *.50
5435
I --3
I GOA
W
.35
i *.50
5673
12A
' GeB
FP
I .35
!-
I *.50
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed fo 180.00 ys of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must b on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 11

WASTE . UTILIZATION PLAN ,
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs -for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 -- Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:J AND M HOG FARM INC.
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. Z
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: J AND
(Please print) _ I `��
Signature:
FARM INC.
Date:
Name of Manager (If/ different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. Smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 577
Signature: ✓
Da t
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 1,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
21-5 CP 7�c;�l S�';] f r✓��/�rJLI
)7 ti Z' r e 0 J'77 C,:-f �0
W)1;i Gt if, 71;2, 1'
Page: 16

' ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 17

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization_- Third Party --Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: IS

op Pion
• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: J AND M HOG FARM INC.
Location: 5110 STRICKLAND CROSS ROADS ROAD
FOUR OARS NC 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeds to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2880.00 hog
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year.. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN •
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. if
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want .to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
-Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = V4172 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN AN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 6 4 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
-
N
TIME
7. 2151
4340
3,4
G e B
BH
6
300
0
I
V/.
�APR.SEP. (U
4340 3,4 SG 1 150 0 17.17 1358.5
I
IFEB.APR.
I
TOTAL12509.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P.and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
t
N
TIME
4.32 432
4340
1
GoA
SA
2
100/
0
IAPR. SEP.
4340
1-1
1
IWA
12
110�
IO
14.32
1432
ISEP.APR.
4340
2
IGoA
SA
2
110�
0
11.89
1189
IAPR.SEP.
4340
1-2
1
WA
2
1100
0
1.89
1189
ISEP.APR.
4340
6
JGeB
SA
2
1 100
0
3
1300
IAPR.SEP.
4340
1-6
1
WA
2
110�
0
3 1300
ISEP.APR.
4340
IS
1GeB
SA
2
1 1QP
0
18.55 1855
IAPR.SEP.
4340
1-8
IWA
2
110
0
18.55 1855
ISEP.APR.
5673
2A
GeB
FP
3.2
16,Q
v
0
3.78 1604.8
ISEP.APR.
4589 15
JGoA
ISA
12
1100
10
14.71 1471
Page:
4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
IAPR. SEP.
4589
1-5 1
IWA
12
110V
IO
14.71
1471
ISEP.APR.
5435
3 IGOA
SA
2-
100
0
2.58
1258
IAPR.SEP.
5435
1-3 1
WA
2
1107
0
12.58
1258
ISEP.APR.
-5-4-3-5-
2
SA
2
0
7 61
IGOA
Ily
17.61
IAPR.SEP.
4455
--2 1
WA
2
10,b
0
7.61
1761
ISEP.APR.
END I j
TOTAL 7136.8
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially Late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may.occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PaR UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
50
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
50
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS (I.E. Sorghum -Sudan Hybri
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
50
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
7.17
2509.5
36.44
7136.8
43.61
9646.3
* BALANCE
-3022.3
RE
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page; 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not recei-ring
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5328
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 17.76 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 42.624 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts. -
I 1
I
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
I Field I
I I
Soil Type
1 crop
I
I (in/hr)
I
I (inches)
4340
1 1 I
GoA
I SA
j .35
I *.50
4340
I I
1 2 I
GoA
I
I SA
I
I .35
!
1 *.50
4340
! I
13,4 1
GeB
I
BH
I
I .35
! *.50
4340
1 I
1 6 !
GeB
I
I SA
1
I .35
I *.50
4340
I I
18 ,
GeB
I
I SA
I
.35
1
I *.50
1
4340 I
I
--1 I
I
I WA
!
! .35
I
1 *.50
4340 !
-2 I
I WA
I .35
I *.50
4340
1
--3,4 I
!
I SG
I
I .35
!
I *.50
I
4340 I
I
--6
I
WA
I
I .35
!
1 *.50
1
4340 I
I
--8 I
I
I WA
I
I .35
I
I *.50

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
4455
I -2
1
I
1 1
I WA
4589
1
1 5
f
f GOA
I SA
4589
f
I -5
1
I
f WA I
5435
i
i 2
i
i GOA
I 1
SA 1
5435
i
i 3
1
i GOA-
I 1
1 SA I
5435
I --3
I
I WA I
5673
1 2A
i GeB
i
I FP I
I
.35
I *.50
.35
f�
1 *.50
.35
I
I *.50
.35
*.50
.35
*.50
.35
f
1 *.50
.35
1
i *.50
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply.
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 10

S
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. 'Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to -properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical.data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 14 tons per.acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to,
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate — determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:J AND M HOG FARM INC.
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facilit
(Please print)
signature:
Name of Manager(If
signature:
J D M HOG FARM INC. /
Date:
Eerent from owner):
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. smith
Aff iliation:NRCS Phone No. 919--989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North street
Smithfield NC 27 77
Signature: �� D e: a?Z

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional Iand has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 1.)
►', �o �? Sod) r�,l /s L, 1p t�,.'r ��.� �/ ,�� 171 I -IV
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a- Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
. 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, J. a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
. 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 17

���a n::-f••�f.".• _k rry3 � "'- +•L•-'• -'7 �JpK +�.� 4�•�/SLAt err+={�::,.. • 4�:�' � - d'„r`--�::sti....:� �'.F r' F%�;_:i•:.
R � * _ r � :.ems: ■■■{11 rr) r'. �y!� r;�'-1 t • F° •:i'''. •�`y :�;. }
L..t ¢_�.r u,t�}1�r0.'�L• f, _ �., . • f7..1 1ir1 +,�L:y�� �11f A .i�.�•�p r ��: 7y 4 �iL R•;
y.{t,�.y_y- � i-'���-�• �k' r j V ;Y�-� ` l� t ' �* � � � (r± �,ti i'r!' ,�tgf !'r '!+i .��>v!ry�i���p�f?yi��, ' -c � � #4 •`•rt� r `
t'
tir 4; T
!s • t � �' .' ,' • 4 }ter ~ �• •r il�"1'� _ t a-
+X -t a y.i �� 1
i },��� �� „�,-yry/ - t' i of � w � ,1 '+ - � - -� �i'1 •-•+.l
t* c '�lL }r y� y `l t ::. t-f.. - � � _�- - •r �� , ' t • y 1 ` ,1 ♦• _ ± �. 4 � �c`,�"OT•
4r
,... •• w-; ,ice -��1 t+ _ � `,� � h ff� Ykl
`•'.� er �{� r � 4?.' • - - r;t � ��F tip. ,Y+•I �� " � ! 5' -�.,..
,y. ;•i4r� }.r��1.3M1' V'T ` t• ,liy f,� - .C'i IT �-�'A •i•' /�
t ti'v' \� 9 '�,�(L4`j? r. " •L 'f� rrp„ ,+J�°Y7`• '" � S r ..l A .� ?,.,�♦ '�; ���: �� ��y `{+j
�),�� � `' tA,�' ra-n , , _.may � � ^ v.• 'C` [cal
?4. I.F+efl j, �•1�. 'yf �K _1A-f'\. i, .Y!.,�r %' _`, 1 .p�. ^R��•.•kilr
•f '''i '{. ,,, .� f- 'fr. _ . i� r.a1 .•V' irnr
��� i+n e'r ` ''• � �c4F5
IL
og
i. �_�!t+(�� � !?� , . ' /-.' per Y A i •
Zt
I'd Nw
A�,,�: ri�.�} �� � , �LT•,y�F' //: �'b cf�� I7���P t f �d �P .�.•y t.. '! 7 �` ���1
i ...•�, ' ,.•:�+-, L..
> +tT s �(
�� 7). '�i 12
!�1t � {�t+r-l�+btSs `�? �, 14,'� � ,t�•�/a a..k � ��ii ,f'G r •�
.'�'t` �(.. ':��'y ! a! ► �-'"�; y+ r�'- � zk..;4{+i�4� , •t ,� ••ti
Y � F�r = '1 ��.:, ... � S• ,iX � � a4 ;,i �€'��'> � •, f� �', � t. � . T��"i.' it`s �i���' y' � t•t' ,�L�'�'. {� �''�1'"•k.,-.,�1
to
fsy{�
r� I � �-r����t �f`�? � �1R'y�j,{ �{i�+;w�-��c�.��Jr � •Y-' 9 � -. R '9i+�,ti.; '-,ti� y, � � �;��•
.{ii•. ,�r�IV
.tk ,';sir}' /(s �• +'• i° 'qy,��• y� Si'L y �.
r'f„- R.`�r >a� 4. R �t.3,-f!,,ppii} Y �` ft�a �'r R i. .•\ . y"4 "1' 1Cr 7iC tT'• t �• �4s
"3:,�i� i f ...s� ) '•, 7-•, //�S, •� ,1F� � fir •, Y�l° y 'fs'1.4t� cr aS�w fs .i-lip+.. } f
.{•' - •k' . ��• T �� � � ,(•. �•r �: r �t,�t� i .� i t� � X'y '"'�.1Y �i+ .iY�• � S t" i r' " 1�i' ��e�., ' �,` rr „

rY 4-
WASTE UTILIZATION ;PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
.fz 1. Animal `waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
}' t, y,' frunoff,'drift, manmade conveyances, direct, application, or
., ;.-
�; >,s direct.,discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of.waste which reaches surface -water is prohibited.
There'.must be documentation in the •design folder that the
_. .,producer either' owns or has an agreement.'for use of adequate
land �•on�`,' hich''to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
^; t..,,not-own`vlladequate land' to properly dispose of waste, ' he/she shall
-' provi.de, a copy' of an ' agreement with a landowner who is within a
, -'reasonable'proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
.•wast'e``application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
`faclity'to- secure -an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there 'is a change in the operation, -increase in the number of
,' ,• ',animals',;' -'method, -of utilization, or available land.
r, r
; Y
�ti„ Animal":.waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
'.';:'_ . available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level ..of,, management, unless there are regulations that restrict
,;the+•°rate of 'application for other nutrients.
°Animal':-waste. shall . be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per "';acreper year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
5 ' orj''more 'tons but less than 10 tons per acre per ear
► P P Y
providing' grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
;field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
.'Odor s ;can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
X danger'of drift from the irrigation field.
1
' ,`tt "�, ' fi 'When animal `waste is to be applied on acres subject to
3'flooding,'•,.it'-will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
Yb '
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, 'the'.'waste may be broadcast provided the application
V'r - does.' not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather.
1,41,"­and.-'Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
` 'Stjj, ;' ;:7 .: `,. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
k'"�r'.inf.il'tration; rate' such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
`{surf ace`.'waters''and -�"in a method which does not cause drift from
the `,site' 'during 'application. No ponding 'should occur in order
to`:cont'rol' odor, or, flies.
$y,,.,•Anlmal.` waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface 'is frozen.
.•'``'� ti� 9:;;FAnimalc waste 5 shall be' applied on actively growing crops in such
Y. a, manner' that -:'the crop ' is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit�`growth.• 'The potential for salt damage from animal
"'''•' '`= waste should also be considered.
Page. 11
s

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
.10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring.planted crops on soils with a high potential for
:leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
�held' t ".
o,a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
t k a e•up,released'nutrients. waste shall not be applied more
'. % t han_30'days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
1,1.,Any;new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
•comply'.with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto -which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
.,a swine--,farm,shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property'boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
'than''an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
.,"''swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall, not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
,'(See,"Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
4, -12.,'-Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
Wells.
13-,'Animal.waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings' other than those owned by the landowner.
.14....Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and ,,public 'right -of --ways.
15.,' Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
-spraying. drain'ageways,'or wetlands by a discharge or by over
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
.'.they -"have been approved as a land application site by a
technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed 'waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and�,on -other grassed.waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic .rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the -site.
"-,-"16.. bomestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation.will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
piperuns,.etc. ). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
y
protect: the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, , etc. , are limited to areas where considered
-appro riate.Lagoon,areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
­Berms.,�and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
o 'eros f,� ion, -,leakage or discharge.
T,
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18.;If:'animal
production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
,possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19.
Waste'handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be�'•inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and.spills. 'A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
.,
.., 20.Animal
waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and,other crops for direct human consumption. However, if'
f
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
<!'r'°`;L;•'
animal waste during the crop season.
%21.'
Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
:'bottom' elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
lagoons. Pumping..shall be managed to
call"waste,treatment
'maintain 'the 'liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be•required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
.,22.,
Waste" shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall'-be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate —'determining
.Y`-; s f '•
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
'�.••
" monitored and alternative crop -sites shall be used when these
t~._:.rat"
metals"approach ' excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop`production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records. shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry ;
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
„v:..::..
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
�.
maintained for five (5) years.
-'23.
Dead animals will,be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
�: ,
Page: 13

-,e•.�' fir S"i�F�� ��
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
f Name .of- Farm: J AND M HOG FARM INC.
Owner/Manager Agreement
I'�,(we);'�understand and. wi 11 follow and implement the specifications
i. and .the�.'o 'Operation and :maintenance procedures established in the
p.
`appr,oved,';.animal 'waste ,utilization plan for the farm named above. I
'.''s: (we)s kn'ow'ythat `any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste -.treatment'. and`.'storage system or construction of new
Pacilit,ies'will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North'Car6i'ina 'Division of Environmental Management NCDEM before
> `--the—new.; animals ,are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
'must'• be.'no" dischar a of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters',,'of' the .state from', a storm event ' less severe than the 25—
ear,-'':-24--hour' storm. The approved plan will be filed on --site at
'the •`farm office and at the, office of the local Soil and Water
,.Conservation District and will be available for review b NCDEM
;.. �;' , upon'. request . Y
'z;', Name 'of Facility Ow J AND M HOG FARM INC.
(P2ease:`print)
" Signature.'.' Date:
Name of Manager (.Ifddfferent from owner)
"f, k; ;F,Msignature. Date:
G
Name of .Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. Smith
Yi°Ec"`t:Affii.iation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
;•, r_;r''S�J.i Address (Agency) : 806 North Street
""' Smithfield NC 27577
7 y
' Signature: Date:
,f"a Page: 14

r ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
_ F „
' ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
'(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, hereby give
'`..permission`to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
..:,on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
w� The fi`eld(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
" attached'map.
T `understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium,.,!.,,and other trace elements and when properly applied
should ',not harm .my land or crops. I also understand that the use
....Of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date;
_f Waste 7 Producer : Date
r
4.•Technical•Representative: T Date:
..SWCD Representative: Date:
'Term of 'Agreement: , 19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Notary
.•� r� �„ ���, „ram,.'
J
Pa i ,
,�s F Page: 15

ANIMAL -WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1�4
YJ Waste utilization
Third Party Receiver Agreement
hereby agree to apply waste
,�­%�generated by
in a manner that meets the
W : astei� SUti 1:ization,,,standard
(633), or use an alternative waste
ti,iizationsystem'that has.been
accepted in writing by the
ivision'.,of-Environmental
Management.
'it Part .,�.Recelver*
Date,
re �l
Term of,,PAgreement: to
(Minimum -Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
ie­
1.
Notary
v",
"T,
Page: 16

a yy F f
V. n0kk
EMERGENCY ACTION P
j. fz. 0 5, 4 -PHONE N UN B E S P®�iti�lin9
D WQ 919 - 5 71-470 0
EMERGZNCY PANAGZMENT SYSTEM 919-989-5050
S:vCD 919- 989-5381
MRCS 919- 989-5381
.;This; plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
-f t`,g, .,your•.operation,,,yre .leaking, oyerflowing, or running off
sitei , You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
�x- or leave,'your property 'tc consider that you have a problem.
' Vou``should make every effort to ensure that this does not
p` "';ciappen ':This _plan should be posted in an accessible
'`l'ocation"for_ all employees at the facility, The following
are some;action items you should take.
N•, a;_!°M;..,:` ' Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
a:,,.',Yh'.;ll ,•situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
V,ol;I�,,_. �+ i'<responses to some .possible problems are listed below.
Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
" a add sail to.berm cc increase elevation of dam.
o. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable race.
C. Atop all flows 4c _he lagoon immediace'-
.
,�x 4'`axis; - -d. Call a pumping c: ncr actor.
+ };` � 3 e. ;take sure nc surface water is ancer?.:Ig lagocn.
r+y� an _Runoff .from waste application field -actions
include.
F
a• immed acely scap ',caste application.
^.. Create a temporary diversion to c .main 'rice.
c Incorporate -,caste =c reduce runoff.
�4 ,• ,+ .. d. valuate and a__minace e reascn(sj _haGz
caused the rune _ _ .
e. t alua=e she app__cat_cn razes fzr the ____as
.4here runoff occurred.
ICY Leakage from Laze .caste - pipes and sp _nklars—acetic
ram' include. ,

y'now
K
y
Von
d: Repair: all leaks prior =o restarting pumps.
l` J1 '. ICY - :
' • Zi,,.
Vi.:ii. - -
i D
,I Deakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators --action include:
11 a: Stop recycle pump.
Stop irrigation pump.
i
"•,
; c . Hake sure no siphon occurs.
d, . Stop all flows in the house,, flush systems, or
-
-solid separators.
`G
e. Repair' all 'leaks prior to restarting pumps.
A
,t f' ;.':.,
c..'rLeakage
from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
r 7
"
-'this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks—
:,°
action:
;possible
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
nut in a submersible _pump, and pump backto
lagoon.
r �; b • if holes are caused by burrowing animals, ¢ or remove animals and fill holes and ccmpac4
s YEN;Kith a clay Cype sail. -
Have a .professional evaluate the =I'tditicn c=
n.•R S� '�,�e 1, 1; '•'
5 ti `he side'Nabs and lagoon bcL.zam as soon as
p c s s i b e '
Ic
s f=Y 'Nt i Assess the extent of the spill and note any cbvious
+r .NO"damages.
Did the waste reach any surface waters--
- -
ApprOXzi�Iately. haw much was released anid nor what
duration?
x,� C !;'Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
"WON
kills, or property damage?
'a.. Did the sail! leave the orooerc••:'
; l%R +tom} � eMes he' i 1pll 'have the i i p-ccea! reach surface
Y 'i. r E '�s a h b ••i •n + .:,LN a v e r s?
s3Cculd a future rain event cause =:.e spill ; ea, ..
u
' r sur+ace wagers?
t1 i-
�^,���ity ;: g Are-pacable 'Nader :yells T danger (_=Aa c;. z-
A`� the property) ?
s rl y4w. 4 1�0 1, 0 :cw much reached surface '.4a ars?
;Ccntac" appropriate' agencies.
i,-.Iiar+tiy,l , ' '`'.- isiv1 Cf Water- Quait
L After MOM":
21;y`kSNnr° f 3 � _ -
7cur
name r* _acil__i,�ela.^-hone number, he ..._jai__ _

eta
4".
4,
thc dent, i­em 2 above, she exaclocazcr-i '
off the'`ac_i_I'_itvi the Lccaz:,'--n cr di—cz"cr, 3-
of ,the- spill, :yea per and wind
The' that
'seen under taken,
the s�zuazion.
-"-"dnd.'z ser--ousness or t
!',Leaves- proper-y or enters surface' waters,
--'cal I ocal .---MS,. Phone number 9 L9 -9 89 -". 50 50.
3j" ZLMS-,to-.contactto-.contactLocal Health Department.
!,;.Co
fitac.t­ CES", phone number 9!9-989-5380, local
f i 'phori -81' ana Lccal ce", e number 9L9-989-53 LTRCS
ice for advice/ technical assistance phone number
"919- 989- 5381.'
,,,I ,r,,none of., the'Eabove works call 911 or the Sheriff's
il
explain your problem to them and ask Dep,artment and
,�;that,.perscn, to 'contact the proper agencies for you.
4,
''Contact the contractor of 1.rcur choice to begin repair
f--,;problem to minimize cff-sit-e damage.
.-a,. ";e,",Ccntrac-zors' Name:
Add-ress: uJc J,
Conractors, Phone.
''Contact the technical specialist who certif'-4ed the
:,Ia oon (NRCS, consulting Engineer, etc.
,,a. Name: Chris smith
�,b.­,,-,'s:phone :, 919 989-5381
"Imp'lement procedures as advised by'DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
;.sys,tem,°;,and reassess the waste management plan to keep
pr6blems'with'release of wastes from. happening again.
N.
4

co,
Ir
'r.. _ - - •"a :�'� .:.§-- fy _ xr � tf',. .�t', rl.:: ''1= .:'i,� �r�M` .�. � ., ,eh ���'�.c. r: 1j,..,s
W� 7-
�46
Y-7
l.r
Zc
0:, k,4
g�4 el
5w.a 02 e
ep W,M
zn_
_,r— 40"
Jr -k
-71
-TC
3�fflwxwf
p2Y.-
sv t"If KtP! A­o