510004_PERMIT FILE_20171231

�11( Q�i�11st
i l I A'Dwi§iori"of
W a t t r_j Reso'uices
Facility Number ®
®Divisiof Soil and Water It onservation
tea?( Hi1Il217,{Itidli! r
®tOtAgency
Type of Visit: 18 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit }}� a Arrival Time: Departure Time: , S County: Region:
Farm Name: L Owner Email:
Owner Name: . ��yyo
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Physical Address: NG }+T, A)ewf -e
Facility Contact: Fod Lpp-- Title: Ow Phone:
Onsite Representative: _E&I Lem Integrator:
Certified Operator: Edd YV, be - Certification Number: )/aY33`
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
Design
Current
Design
Current
Current
S �i°�s
�°Puai
Pls°��
Cit it
C���s��l d #
pi i'ty
�'
iarupa �nn�
iWe V
is
flu n
. i'
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
j
3
Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
&IaQ
&Q21
Dairy Heifer
Farrowto Wean
@2Qa
01
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D , 1?ou[t .
fi'orn ILn
Ca aci
Po p
Non -Dairy
Farrowto Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other,
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
❑NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
[] Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Faci31 Number: 51 - OQ Lt Date of Ins ection:'6a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: SOW AjvfseuiS Sd1! !h
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): `� ate_ _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
f5d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[5d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
l l . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
F�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Coadal ells-Ll_ Nay` SmaIfl arc! OvY19jewd -
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[:IN E
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
❑ No
® NA
11)
NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Nuraber: - 060 Date of Inspection: qjaj 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [�g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
❑Yes
ISNo
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
❑ Yes
�s] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes ®No ❑NA ❑NE
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? Ifycs, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes C] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
alF, Para w'r t l ►leek3 has C04nu� bAfwe_ +lie e4 of­�e yeaA.
aS, Sl J e wv-- ala0It7
n S(� � , Iso NV'r
s)ul'o a,q 313 a s
-3,0
LA �3
( )
CHID}
ay, CO
WOj
AMIys-e1
liholr>
w00@7?S
7)la119
!,, ra. I I$
rvoaoa7�
nraa bqa o
0a,117
wool L47 y
31��115
wonsfo y
-7I10117
WOOD1aq
lll�il�
1,v003*3
Sjj,)Jp
w00700�
Goads jo b o,) r-e_ c odi-
farm Is de la*U
8;)/1�4 IS U10to dale
Reviewer/Inspector Name: T0924 �h D2)'4_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
qaye se-Alys;
�ocn.sohn,�l�Q)�cd�ln�o
FKtie e l el a�1 Lsoi r a�alysl�� dMe.
jn 4C107� ao 17 � 1Naiers aid, Ex�he 1,i mr-�
hm e_ 4 o uh P-eco; m a'h`a,f
c-d *2 roc levels rve-e le, 1 �f o / 1 P ela/s
Phone: n�JQ-74 �— WY
Date: iYv a 0
1JW 015

Type of visit: UCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: !(Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: ivaorn::] Departure Time: Qa County: Region:
Farm Name:
L&I
Ea/23
Owner Name:
nrl
illhop&
L
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: M WAW4 5-09 . New, brove-
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: EK I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: G1 Ir Integrator:
ile�Certified Operator: tf Lpe— Certification Number: I6g35
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design CurrentlilililiImlimesign
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
I ILayer I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 09
D
1 INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Lj�iS;i
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean a Q {
/ Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
RNon-Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges_ and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit' Number: 51 - OWX jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: FA SOS!
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �� QA
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required butlers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
5d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
Records &_Documents
19,
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[5a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design []Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5D No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis []Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 5D No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA [3 NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - 0001 Date of Inspection: S a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CR NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes W No []NA []NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [& No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes M No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 91 No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes RNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer;to,question.4 :Xxplain any YES answers and/or.any additional: recommendations,or'any other.comments:: `
Use drawings of facility tobetter `explain situations (use additionalpa2es as necessary),
a6.1304 1V'111 by ialarlaof8
= es✓rut ��aslt� Fin Sow .130 kur
SIVdje7 a4 33 51 3, 1�-t!
lS Trf Vol I y.a 43 9,s (_�+)
ay. �'o t��ral; a�lol3�li�_ Coc
t Lim? col ep -2lk ov f 0e =
Hew Ie re4li)Jf -0a
i- 6a�^ � Per,
at. � a✓s) wO& A-nalpej So(( T��t00561j 10j i1r'�6. y
3107 woo 510Y k*r . cro f IvAdOw eK4PSr07 ��C4'0-1* 1 ► a
11a*7 Vvooy t" 3I,f1~7 ao11p [ems) CfQ aay)
101I a�I� VVoQ a*p i� evet a.0 hW( cui,e MOfge►►- 101 g IIP),
(u�13�I{p VV00 lb Is
al�ti�lp W009ggo
a r I rhg is up to da4e
Reviewer/Inspector Name: —jo� schof f �f Phone: � 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
_j 06h "Sch"Woncdfnr3ov'
Date: 3d 30
21412015

-�us-brjq� o&fagr(j�
Type of Visit: -0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ; Departure Time: IYI� County: Region: PM
Farm Name: LIP ��a-�'h �+; Pdf.4l Owner Email:'�
Owner Name: Edo i Le f, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ft & NC i Irv' 50,5 0V
Facility Contact: Title: o Wlw"- Phone:
Onsite Representative: V fI Lee, Integrator: )1)d—
Certified Operator: BUJ Lee, Certification Number: J toS
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current sign Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry CDeity p. apacPo
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
�+
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
0
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P.oultr. Ca aci P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Pouits
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection: j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Fywatv / A
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): c
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes n No [DNA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
C!R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C-1001 Q) 861447 6tl SM1011 gfoi1 ovePet
13. Soil Type(s): PV11-A Syl ' Ucr IS -- ---
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
(2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
r5g Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ® Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
E4 NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412014 Continued

Facili ' Number: - Ej
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes C@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey El Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to -question #) Exolam any;YES answers and/,or any additionalirecominendations�ortany other comments ; � ,
Use drawings of facilityto better explain sif6ations (use3:additional pagesas necessary).o j,,1
a,t7of h45 3 hr5 cmfiinui� ed- by �e Pi9, of a 0 I S' 7, e Yvorko7 rau a,'5' -e
as,s! i/7dje-
�ey - ©�w1 za F in�►d_ f a h a'� ► i�h�,
/ 3 $,a 3.0 3, 3
y
r, q 1
y I�p Woo Ll q90 1,55' 0,11 Ij
r�INI�� rvoal �� �•aa oq a•a9 �'��
VVOO77$ a,a� a� 17 3'�r- a'aI
I�s�
Woo y.so3 f. Yy �,� � 1:a7
1 Iro1Jy, �o� 3 },ens, L't, co frq zinc. l��e�sa-eye
50 J I TCOr�sz ass0 a � r�as� l �-
V UM#O,,r s !Q eVeAr ,l qo l�j 9
©�
s ra Ih acrl�fl a 'elds 4 k +� r� �'''�•
�y P 100 1,b5 -For Urs�L. s L C W `s
Noo � *4 �-o b in tin -��yne� va)� Ond i sil L Noy -ao«- �c� oar v,7 t'/
y �► sw ��
M rW r r�ch�°s belows'l Pr row"
Reviewer/Inspector Name: _Jlo ark '_�-_111ywiPl- Phone: - - 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:%915�1Date: _JU1 p [ % a of
Page 3 of 3 21412014

Dlvlslon,of Water.Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 51 0004 Facility Status:
Inpsectlon Type: Structure Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Active . Permit: AWS510004 [] Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Johnston
Date of Visit: 02/29/2016 EntryTime: 11:10 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm
Farm Name:
Lee.Brothers Form
Owner:
Earl Wood Lee
Mailing Address:
853 Oak Forest Rd
Physical Address: 8828 NC Hwy 50 S
Region: Raleigh
Incident #
Owner E;mall: leebrothers®ncwisp.net
Phone: [phone]
Four Oaks NC 275248592
Newton Grove NC 28366
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 17` 45" Longitude: 78° 26' 10"
1-40 Exit 334. S on NC 96, 07 ml.Left on NC 50, Just past Intersection of Godwin Lake Rd, turn right on entrance rd. Office on
other farm, 51-52,
Question Areas:
Certified Operator: Earl Wood Lee Operator Certification Number: 16435
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Earl Lee
Phone:
On -site representative
Earl Lee
Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Joan Schneier
_^
Phone: QJf �`7qf' yd
Date: CJ11 d0/
Secondary Inspector(s):
inspection Summary:
page, 1

Permit: AWS510004 Owner - Facility : Earl Wood Lee Facility Number: 510004
Inspection Date: 02/29/16 Inpsection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
i
Wastq StructMros
Dlslgnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
FINISHER
26.00
Lagoon
ISOLATION
27.00
Lagoon
NURSERY
22.00
Lagoon
SOW
25.00
page: 2

(Type of Visit: Q9 Compliance inspection U Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 10 Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Q.q? Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:/ (� _ Lip - ^T Phone:
Mailing Address:
Region: R p n
Physical Address: %'6DL NC, f yvy 90S VPh4✓t77j &Q11P
Facility Contact: L? iVj�Title: Ayapl Phone:
Onsite Representative: F/'lLee Integrator:
Certified Operator: tdy1 _ h/11 >& Certification Number: _�%4,35
0
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
x
Design
.Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poulyry
Capacity
Pop.
C*attle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
d Q
Dairy Heifer
�(
Farrow to Wean
10
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P■Dull .
Ca aci
P■o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes ® No 0 NA NE
Yes []No QNA EjNE
Yes [] No NA NE
Yes No
Yes ® No
Yes No
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: �1 - (� Date of Inspection: Slara=
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes C@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No D NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ::Sbw — l5 I,SO 51�h
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 33_ 3�I.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ZR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
E) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 L Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Ca I �P/4,1 V. SIVII &,016
13. Soil Type(s): P11 A S , V C C-11
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Dg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
(2. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[5�No
[] NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
C No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [A Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard OWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -
Date of Ins ection: 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [;@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes K71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P;7r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or anyadditional recommendations or, any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use.. additional pages as necessary).
c16,tcrl hus- CQh-`'q✓ J ek nova -ftr - hij /e4r i� h,t'i1 h�. & � ovrs soy7e0ne betw1*9 t er
da - �PrPm b ao 18 ,C!jp y� Annwp w kss exegto
c.�w ,F►m ash f Uvfs so ,
as.sl ,,Ve Ial/lly57&D.�rt7vr a rr�df.
9� s 1Ud9e- 340 3,a 3.0
TtiVole 511 OI4 54
010 31 A 31 a?
'D ,' ati b/VV01 1al,7 1+q, Ne�+dw in a010 �s,� �vcl� ya�O divl�hI stoma- amy , kt1Fh j►l� -
` VVMf e- Soq bpi Sow R, jfh � s �,a7 SO evf * o[Lwy l�l a bCt Mys &trc
al alalrs 1. .$ .
ry pp45.0 yy 1 9 I
VV00 oat 1 �ol4l�y 1,,a0 Z4 t' o$ I yy
yvoo PO all fq !r &3 3k3 y ?� 3 S f� aCO%'&5,1-2kC_ 1 �PIJ Oq'
s�,fI sa„f le- sL. ��s�a r Ito j►y� F'�e�ds w� rr n�L
sm,
11, Got job r fi� s Qy � � Gtclw P;.etds
7, nisll� } r b Q%r cam (� fYrsfcle !�'� e�+han k (hPaihooey , W11I n e4 *r a' 1r
V J
4avx;wr
l! �s fi�lls}S, )oO its',
i ring is UP'10 0(afe
� -SS vwv •r w.�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �� Schn,�l,Pr Phone: q� rq 1— 4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q
Page 3 of 3 /4/20I4

i ype of visit: C>,ruompttance inspection v operation Keview V structure r,vamarion V i ecnntcal Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Q Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3- Arrival Timer Departure Time: :Qd County: l h� Region:
Farm Name: Lee_ 1Rrdth*-_c P /z3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: —041 VQed_._1'Po Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: RozI j
hlI/ �, Title: OWn& -- Phone: 919-4�a,3)(7i C1 Onsite Representative: o L Integrator: -ie)d-pmd Ott
Certified Operator: Ed/ I Yyoad L2e. Certification Number: 104 3,r
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design C*urren#
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Pott`ry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle C►aPd a C I t--VjmmFop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DaiEZ Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
X Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
><I Farrow to Wean
000
Design
C►urgent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr.. P.oultr.
Ca aci
P.o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Qther
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) C] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes tg No ❑ NA [] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facifi Number: jDate of Inspection: 13141
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: fQF6a&4 Numervs(9W
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �' 7�t; l — s
5. Are there affy immediate threats to the integrity f any of the st %res observed? a J
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5
®No ❑NA ❑NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
[]Yes [5? No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[,;Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
LLB No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
M. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence ofWindDrift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Call,"# I 'Qj I J n 'ay .�%�'all)q,, 1) ft1'"PIJ
.S - - - Ics - /, J- -
13. Soil Type(s): _U i&y'�yrh-P{� of ix-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[5g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [] Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking D Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA []NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 571 j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CS No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [5D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes C� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes N No 0 NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
EJCNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
M No
[] NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
JoNo
[]NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments= refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use'drawings'of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
a(o, 0 1 C heeds ct�-f�A+�,t� ecl' la ) 3) I Is-,
01, Y►1G)ie Arg �1mv /
N'r ISO
5nls
5I111� I.la3
?,03 I•u9
3,3y 1N0000
a 0a j,qg
s, )o VVOOWOI �
913113 J,00
5410113 Ir$3,
Collb(*o, -fil}), Ira,
sb; l 111011 q SL Ca-7 . NO [.ice
n•efd4- , correl4-3 k- GYM. P41h10 NP6,
W(11 l'}4 so" s"441)1 In � ✓iP .
7ah w1,11 Cb1*hyd1adic Wd� "l
I. aq 1, 0 1,7 (a� a� aiC ®Ids w��4e
a, (oS ,q0 3, V3 yv00730/
r foils specs, n/011 n-ef44p be -Noll
t5l�dyes-live ia14113
7SoIV V./ Aso
Ski 3, y '33
Zi�-y� forte !�(3 S,) 5� 1
)I, P63e- Coll, L4 s �bon
PleajyYyy'h tn51! a ks
si�tlnXll a' 61*10 cress Cv'P_ h'W
VI©o 1551
t7l'o
3.0 `
shade ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Ui1 5c'-ha ehot
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: qjq 7qi—�(��0ll,cr/
Date:
/4/2011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection U Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi� J, Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: i Arrival Time: Departure Time: County Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name: eh.A I '�_U
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone: q[q H CQ a a 1 G
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: C ,
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
in
=apsaity Pop.
Wean to Finish
n Cur]rrentSine
Wet Poultry C**opacity Pop.
La er
C«attle Capacity
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai CaFeeder
to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean l
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D P,oult Ca acit P,o
Non-DairyFarrow
to Finish
La ers
Beef StockerGilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
s
Turke Poults
OtherrI
Beef Brood CowTurke
EL10—ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
01
❑ Yes ;2'_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �I fo
❑ YesirNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

v
Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: J'QhL4_ 1L)1Vwg&j�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 I o� t I 3-,T ! f-5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [,-a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes P No [3NA [3NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [!I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes , fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes P] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes T1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes PTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections [:]Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �VN
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: -0<4 jDate of inspection:
X-
24. Did h! facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes �j-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. s the fac1ili out of compliance with permii conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. )-Q ) `9L d�LA-A— P
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Wxgo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues T
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ;3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility
tto .hetter explain /situations (use additional
pages
/as necessary). '
-a4 -OL a, t 9 b 1 FT►x):X5 a: S �1 v
a - 4 - f CD a , $ (,).1 (v w� 3 Ll fi 0
N� � -
ai.,- _ ca-�
I f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signaturf
Page 3 of 3
Phone; 7 / ) 9341
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: ompliance lnspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine Q Complaintt O FFol�low, -up O Referral O Emergency 0 Outer 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: l t•/ Departure Time: C0unty:n_5 A) Region:&
Farm Name: Lg ,--- G4- o + h rS Fa.-e-rn Owner Email:
Owner Name: 6 tit A L, a.c Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: &l,C 1Le je Certification Number: ALA? 8_1_L_1-Y_ 3s
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
C*apacity
C►urrent
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
Non -La er
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
1 2 0
2000
Design
Current
DairyHeifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
FrSE���Gilts
Non-La ers
eef F
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
urke Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
HT
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
[] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
P3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued
�S�l 1

Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,._ lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes l 40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
maint enance or
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1=1'p►S hOltj rseC- V Sax
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):1
Observed Freeboard (in): C, J N 9 t ar.&2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
0 Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
& Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ;2-11qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes );D'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
;0
mprovemen .
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
19. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes �❑/'"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4e o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,L TrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yese,�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ED'No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �' o
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ YesAn-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: S I 1 Oq Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�
25.IIs thel facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. 11- 1 q — 42 0 10 Sew = Y 4 07.0 S'so = 430,70 F,'n = 3 o Ajom=35IN
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes,E:rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,EErTA ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes" ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes f4�1_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
(
❑ Yes Rio
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question-#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, a,ny other co'mments'��.
Use drawings of facility to betterexplain%
situations�(use-additional pages as necessary).
oy
441C '0 .
CA I ! a4) ri 1 a 1 C Pry a a 33) F#Cva.h
Q hfor 9r S aCa tAul
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
I R o l 9% 1
Phone: C% % — r)Q
Date:
1412011

Type of Visit: 9f Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: r Departure Time: County:ypl-Irtsf eeV Region: "Y'i22'(-'�
Farm Name: „ �;, e.: re) Emr VV- Owner Email:
Owner Name: �(T is L 0 p C) 6 _. _ 1 p Phone:
r
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Design Current
Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry
La er
Non -La er
Design
Capacity
C►orient
Pop.
Cattle
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
al �°r..t7r>
piC ,��
D
©r, P.oultt,
Design
Ca aci
Current
P,o P.
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Other
Other
L
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
_Discharses and Stream Imoacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [:]No
[:]Yes [:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Wf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

r
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility mil to'c�>�r ate waste
$application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
cat 25. Is the facility out of compliance with pen -nit conditions )elated to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes I f J No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA D. NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit'? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) T
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other; 4
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):,Explain any YES ansi er's and/or any Add Mona Vrecommendations or,'an other comments
Use drawing's ofacilit to'better explain situations (use`additional
:51 u &%a SLc,%,t� ao I o sow .T-5 0 r--Crt 1"5 1% K_QAJ"A.T .
yt
t�o�( Jaz�t a o I o - cm•a ,� c.�,..+ h i9. Ls�
SOUJ Lf Ll d70 L, 3 °Id F•X� 3 7 alv rJ tmko 35�J
I1/9J,o
CIVAIL _,t�t
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: rW [_ y al-9
Date:
21412011

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ YesXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: i rYt a J),k Qx 4 tAAP i
U
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? r
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes P^No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Vl�o [DNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
l 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for Iand application?
❑ Yes
I /I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Type of Visit P Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit jzfRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: I / County: U (J Region: `
Farm Name: t �i----.���� ;-l_5L]C Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: I Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
g
Location of Farm: Latitude: = = =ds Longitude: mor7i 01d
35 1 a9513fJ
Design C►urrent
Design Qs urrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Pltrpacity Population
ouy Ca
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
El Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts
❑Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo. ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
El NE
[I Yes
[I No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of .3
xi_ 10C,
12128104 Continued

In
Facility Number: —Cj Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier; rU/yV2 A �
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in);
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes J2 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
[I NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
[:]Yes .10'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soii
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 1'06LK__l
U. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
V'_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PNo
El NA
El NE
I& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
'` l.t '..:�z;; „��.��s.-. Y::r.-t_1�9„`,#) � t �ys�xplain:any',, _�'`'�:�,:��`-=.�s�*�:.���..-_ `��-'8�',�.�'�x':��V:�.�:".. � .�:�,�r ::"',4�i�'��`Sk � :�'sa'i-a:�
Comments {refer to yuestian EYI,9§ answcr..s:and/or�any recommendations or any other comments
��Useldrawings;of'facility'to<better' ziolain situations us6addij ioaltpagcs as necessary):
AL
T
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone: qrl —90 13
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
p 2
o f ? 12128104 Continued
age

Facility Number: Date of Inspection l /
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes (r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ElOther
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 112<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
P—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
VTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments andlor.Drawings;".��.�
58- ao vo
c�,t 1 a j III as -- , a Q_ f o 9 nytoa+ C LQ'-1\ --
Sc O = 311 = n 4 1 07o
0 1-I l Ujd
a �4a S7or
Page 3 of 3 I'll
a ) o "1 55W `d / U 9 q
12128104

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 90 Division of Soil and Water Conservation M I - � Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit / Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County. Region
Farm Name:% Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: M) (?I gt I a a a 3 12
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: I Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder a
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = O = 6 = Longitude: ❑ ° = ' ❑
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Non -La ec
�-(15
t�OTry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current.
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures: �I
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: 5F-CR Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Z5 n IF A P7ro
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): r�]
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes P"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes P'1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Zr
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
IL Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
121"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
L31No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
5?rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
�edr4F1. �'. Y f's-5.%s£$` wtA 'f�Cen� er to��estan#)rExplatnanyY15 answers ,and/or anrecammendations or anytnthercUa�wmgsoffaLty�toett�rxplantuations'`(use addittofn page.asnecessay
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name e Phone: Qf�
Reviewer/Inspector Signat e:
Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued
L

�i
Facility Number: f 1 —M Date of Inspection �[Jg
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
E/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
IV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
71 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal'?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElI( Yes
�VNo
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Adiiitional Cominents'anillor'Draryin s"h
i
- - 1'; ��a
T,S0 51L110q 314 g 12L1104? @.q I I I-a010�.r 9 sloa
F14 1y1cq �a a aIa41og II
t0 0E-, 514109 a, 1 al-Q4109 all
KiO s 109 L4 to 'D I -a Lobs -3 t Cj
r
I a I s i 4 g WoLir -
jGg �tue I.atio4'
d- C T 0 3, y= 3 0C176
Page 3 of 3
12128104

Type of Visit 7Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Vlsit LRoutine o Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑Dye�nJied Access
Date of Visit: rrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��i7 INSV "Region:
Farm Name: too an.rptl\p !11 Owner Email: 1
Owner -Name: Phone: q19 '+
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [= c 0 4 = Longitude: = ° = ' 0
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ;;YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J2<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date Inspection
of
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes )21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _T�70 k) LAR
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): n'} _
Observed Freeboard (in): 0?1+} 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ,rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,�,/
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes LQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? �
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El2 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
1214o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
ON
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J2<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
di_,,}41�y...;: §+•..�;j>`;i.'1LFY L}'r &.Er�i-? ,
CominentsF(refer to questton,#). ExplarnFanyYIJS;answers, andlor�any recommendattons o.r any othercommen.ts.
f#r . ' f t.
Use drawings oftfaahiy�to better,explatn situations. (use addtttonaPpages�as necessary}:
-to F1 <lt. i€tl_;. X 11 R 17 :.�
i
Reviewer/inspector Name �rti e
1 Phone: rZ L
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: aam
Date:
Page 2 of 3 / 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ICJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
RfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:1 NA
[:1 NE
[I Yes
��No
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/oC DraWin S
(o'�(o-0 , 3 _ r. 3-0'% 11 15- - ; �-On ) Sy a a +0 7 a - is -O 1
p Jam'°
y . 4 5-W-V _ �, Fajv%k� - 5 ,1 PJ -C S, ass a
a/4 attwnA55wz�ta�
age 3 of 3 12128104

0. Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ( Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: JI (// �T Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: J��
Farm Name: LEE B RCTHE S F 14 Em Owner Email:
Owner Name: EnAI _I c) *36 A Q 4 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: f fill.% AD o TPk a b' t >-Q
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: A (D 14 I Lq a5
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = i =61 Longitude: = o = A 0 «
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population ' Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La ei
in
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current-:_
Cattle Capacity Population ;
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Statc
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ip�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
ti s
Identifier: I-N �0
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3, r ' (.� t� t
5. Are there any immediate thUs to the integrit o any of the struct'u s observed? 5 J
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan'?
❑ Yes 40
❑ Yes dNo
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? . ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes OfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ENO ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
U
13. Soil type(s) Pun 10 n— CL O I () C, h gj _
--
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;!fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑
Yes
_ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
L� I o
El NA
[I NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment`?
El yes
[ NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

'Eacility'Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5�� c O c ) a� Nft�20. Doesthefacility failto haveal components CA MP readily available? If yes, check ❑yes ;2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Doe record keeping need improvement? If yes, chec the appropriate box below. ElYes 2 No ElNA ❑ NE
Waste Applica 'on ❑Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis L, /s, Analysis PrW aste Transfers Annual Certification
Rainfall Xfstocking Arop Yield 120 Minute Inspections X]Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections VWeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0
ElNA [INE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
D U7 m - +
C yu Nf- CO W-Mh OF
9pump
AT£ eoC_ L713 �C7
L'0 00 9 S3
I J `j C) (o a q D
L(90-f a
I tc�c nA ra 10(e D t
C&1&tdaeV5 UWAZLOCCt 30pssr G5A#7C
aOOS- ®Ovfo Cahn bl atfoa 1, aQ -va30 a40 270
cte+V1AAflh-,e Arms — e4 a® 6 � L 7 � Lis, 0)a o1 r) �70 a S
-So#Ai y L� z � W � �, , 2. ,. t. t7 1 z . U .a► <
'
s v 12128104
T_fN1'S`1

FAX COVER SHEET
r""^ NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENR Raleigh Regional Office
+Aw^M
F.�wme 162$ Mal! Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Pages, including cover sheet
TO: HafN &Lc4 FAX: 9 1 L/ -
�a/a3 07
FROM: rb rn Q o _. �� _ .. DATE:
SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:
If you do not receive all pages, call 912. 791.4200 or fax back to 4 I q - TO - '7159
�s _ * 0 ' ■ # Z. O t 1. : ,

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510004 Facility Status: Active I Permit: NCA251004 1 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 01/17/2007 Entry Time:10900 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Lee Brothers Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Earl Wood Lee
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1245 Oak Forest Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Physical Address: 1245 Oak Forest Rd Four Oaks NC 27524
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"17'45 __ Longitude: 78°26'10"
From the intersection of 96 and 50 go South on 50 for 1.4 miles to the intersection of SR 1116. Go past the intersection for 150 feet
and turn Rt. on the path,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Earl Wood Lee
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16435
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
John N Hunt
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Records are required for 5 years, older records may be removed. Be sure to up date freeboard log (last entry 1/712007.
21) Must include weather code and initial system was checked at least every two hours of operation during waste applications.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251004 Owner - Facility: Earl Wood Lee Facility Number : 510004
Inspection Date: 0111712007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
FINISHER
27.00
agoon
ISOLATION
27.00
agoon
NURSERY
32.00
agoon
SOW
27.00
Page: 2

Type of Visit i$1 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit( �31I11outine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 114- C-L Arrival Time: g Departure Time: County: c �% of Region: 9RC)_
Farm Name: ' ' f-Y1 G YV+- Owner Email: r
Owner Name:' 1 Y� Lje� Phone: i1
Mailing Address: IZ f.-s— oak= 4Qyq%-k— IAA ' Y 0a �,f
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: f Title: V � e r Phone No: 9 1 C� !22 ~ C31
n
Onsite Representative: Vee- -e-, Integrator:
1 ,,� r 2 k 1i
Certified Operator: l V �' ' Operator Certification Number: `
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ e ❑ ' = Longitude: 0 ° =' =
c�vv� ✓ f ¢ fr �` tf C� o, A So r 5 4 t� � �a 1'4 m � 2P i o `
yj C)r, �-y, �� i GN-.:, past- k62, r}e YrP_ c. �� cr, l 5� e n� C` ti ✓ �.
Design C►urgent
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
C►apacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle C•apac':ty Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
b
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
26'Do
Dry Poultry
❑ Da Cow
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Layers
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Co
❑ Turke s
Ot e
JE3 Turkey Poults
❑ Other
100ther
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes MNo ElNA ElNE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J�)No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

I
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection I t! I I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structl4re 2�� Structure 3 Stru ture 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ` y 301 a
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
ElNA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
MNo
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate puhlic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
No
[INA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
1�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wi d Drift ❑^!Application Outsi e of Area
12.
Crope s ���
type(s) /
13.
Soil type(s) %kc j_v- ` Tyt GY`�e j a C
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
TNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
4� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments refer to aestion # : E ( q ) xplain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any othmr"comments a
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use.additional pages as necessary)
La 41 r1�.r���Ce�,
SX
t.+ Av'
-L_ y
\ 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name `
—1 Phone: FI3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: a
Page 2 of 3 (J - 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection l 1 [ 1 !
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'EpNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes 'PNo ❑ NA ElNE
El Design El El the appropriate box. ❑ WUP Checklists II 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes q9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
'E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
*E
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
'o
❑ NA
r NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
1ANE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
'®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
If No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
-E�?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
�q,�yy,.
C-11> L ok
ea , ��� rf , C_ A N,--� 3
t
\
_NIn
wc)'f� .7A
cl
La. v\ �Q-l�`f d Y��r 11 �2C��� .�- �J� 1" ���1�fr1 jrGl►^ e.�r`
'
F1
Pa e I of 3 11 ` j 12128104
q Y ✓r

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510004 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA251004 1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 03/29/2006 Entry Time:08:10 AM Exit Time: 09:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Lee Brothers Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Earl W Lee _
Mailing Address: 1245 Oak Forest Rd Four Oaks NC,27524
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°17'45" Longitude. 78°26'10"
From the intersection of 96 and 50 go South on 50 for 1.4 miles to the intersection of SR 1116. Go past the intersection for 150 feet
and turn Rt. on the path.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl W Lee Operator Certification Number: 16435
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Lee Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
POA for sludge maintenance, 7/26/04
Soil samples 417/04 Waters Lab
3/13106 Waters Lab
WU Plan Lanton soils hydraulic limit is 0.48"/event
needs to initial for inspections at least every two hQurs.
7) Take goo oo a a spo s w ere agi a or was placed that no erosion of lagoon liner has occurred.
Records are require for 5 years.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA251004 Owner - Facility: Earl W Lee Facility Number: 510004
Inspection Date: 03/29/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon
FINISHER
48.00
agoon
ISOLATION
36.00
agoon
NURSERY
42.00
agoon
SOW
51.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA251004 Owner - Facility: Earl W Lee
Facility Number. 510004
Inspection Date: 03/29/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar9es & Stream Impacts
..................................................... .................
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
1101111
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Cl
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
1101111
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA251004 Owner - Facility: Earl W Lee
Inspection Date: 03129/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number : 510004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste. _Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Blanton
Soil Type 2
Uchee
Sail Type 3
130jac
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
Cl ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA251004 Owner - Facility: Earl W Lee
Facility Number: 510004
Inspection Date: 03/29/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA251004 Owner -Facility: Earl W Lee
Inspection Date: 03/29/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number : 510004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

I
Type of Visit,W Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: a Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �+-� "� Region:/"`
Farm Name: L� -100z- Owner Email:
Owner Name: —
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: _Clgfu �L-r_ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 = ' = Longitude: = o = '
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
2.Ztj ❑ Non -Layer
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
ElFeeder
to Finish
t(!;2(!>
❑
Farrow to Wean
cQD
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
ElBoars
Other
❑ Other i
Dry Poultry
ElLayers
El Non- Layers
❑ Pullets
ElTurkeys
El Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ElApplication Field ElOther
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
El Dairy Cow
El Dairy Calf
El Dairy Heifer
El Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
ElBeef Stocker
ElBeef Feeder
ElBeef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

.,t-
Facility Number: 51 — Date of Inspection /$
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 a -! LD
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VN. ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes �rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) G..
13. Soil type(s)
j=
144. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name �l..f: 1� +1 �i� �; � ' Phone: 7f/ c%Z 5/0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2 '�
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S(— Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
it 03
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the aj P readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ g Other 10
p
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑Weeklyz"
Yreeboard ❑Waste A�YAysis ❑ 2 Anna zis ❑ Waste
Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Raifall ❑ Stocying ❑ Crop/field ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain
Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? `/�aq
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?Y
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2T
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 7117/-', `I
❑ Yes
2�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or.air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
,� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Adtlitianal Comments and/or Drawings
z�
T-s-Cacs-9 S &" �� c+' A-ED �!L_ � iF �4i���s
�Il �
A114-1 r, G a LDEf—, CA 34 £rn a,rED
!t a! ti/ES i • �f A T't� S Z h � G E A b'� l.a CA-�r `� �S' T' I-��R-"7` t�.T E'arLF ' �'� (_l_.o � � G� I j
B� /aSug srrr�rh.t. rf�GA-T°IV_ v(A�csZ '40e UT
rl'o +` .� L� z s'r �. �'� taP— 0 vj Q,-
12128104

Type of Visit Snompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Ooutine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: P Time: ' 3
Nat O erational O Below Threshold
P4�ermltted J'Certtified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......
FarmName: .............G.i ...ld '' 1 ... �r...........--•-.-•--••-----------------.--------------...... County:........�Lr.�''. ....�.................... ...
Owner Name:
Phone No:........
MailingAddress:........................................................---•-........................................................................................................... .............. ..........................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Tide; ................................................................ Phone No:. '+ � ..Z..-.. z.3. 1............
Onsite Representative: K- Integrator: t
p 14( i.........c......................................................................... ...................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • & 46 Longitude • ' 64
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /0 'No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes iNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E!rNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: lk) i, -
Freeboard (inches): 3
121.12103
❑ Yes I— No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes eo No
❑ Yes RrNo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: r(— Date of Inspection i z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ NO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes FINo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes A No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Ov oad ❑SFrozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
40b
12. Crop type G ,�F-M U v 14- is eti S' -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes �' o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes P No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes j;rNo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ;:Wo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes PNo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes JZNo
Air Quality representative immediately.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date: I I
17/17/117
I'-fi.-A

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 11 dz-
Required
Records & Document.
No
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
[]Yes
P
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Management Plan readily available?
Waste
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 744 az
❑ Yes
;'No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ Waste Application ❑ Fre,�fioard ❑ Waste App ysis ❑ Soil Sampling 1115 JIQ4
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicAle setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
&NO
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
9To
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
El_ Yes
/
o
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PIKO
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0"No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
01No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
13'fes
[:]No
31. I€ selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Q-No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑�I�o
fi 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 4 j 1 aq ❑ Yes //
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes <o
❑ StockinbXorm ❑ Crop YielgFro*rm ❑ R Afall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
11120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certif-on Form
tZ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
9--U xt'ri J" k � orT S L �4 g S �r 1cA t► in o �' 4D A -w-q f T•-Q P— C,,t
P 1} S in c M J�>} brt — cuazJ Ftzt aCd'FW fE. Fc - a r>a .S- 1;+
9CLP'5' J" "Vk' r r `r►k'V-,J Ton
�7 � NHS S.�IS r.i 1t'"r.D P�.A-.,� v� �tfii" 0►.1 Fes_ S t. V QG E R'�AJC-"r�`a n%
Jo t1,.?S-rc-Kr S vW CA 14LL, F-t-�;_,Lt.S R INM<_'�> ' L o sA '.
Iz) C.iA-sV__ for ra ,.JsrALS-- r.`.) ;3izX� KAQA 5
12112103

Type of Visit gompliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ,ORoutine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Facility Number 0
'plFe`rmitted Cer//tif��ied [3
C/onditionally Certified [3 Registered
3 Pnrm Namr.
4
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Time: 9
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: '4g10 A—t r - ft./
Phone No:
Facility Contact: ritle: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 1 6 4` 35-'- __
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a ° 44 Longitude 0 �� �44
Design, Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acft vi''Population Poultry Capacity Po ulation";y Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer'� ❑Dai
El Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I on -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
gtP nds /.Soltd`Fr`aps�_ .K❑ No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. 11'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Area U Spray Field Area t
F• ir,� i ::+
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: l�JCSi� r� "t IF t 5C 1_Ao 1111
Freeboard (inches): 3/_
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes j0"No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Io
tfJ No
Structure 6
05103101 1Continued

Facility Number: Sf — Date of Inspection Z c�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AIRplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evident e�of�over application? ❑Excessive Pending El PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
11 0
12. Crop type 4CO- gasp
13. Do the receiving crops differ with th se designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents ,,��ff��
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coveragd�&C� geral Permit0t�or other Permit readily available? `s 'f 5� w
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Cetrtl1ed7Anurial Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
_9.��6 b �
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri�on, fre�ard, AA anza.i lyslisx;L &isoiisar446 reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22 F'l t' IDW f 4t' ' III,I-IP 49
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes �ffNo
❑ Yes )ZfNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ""0
❑ Yes _01No
❑ Yes '�_drNo
El Yes 16 No
El Yes P(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes �_'Ko
[I Yes ErNo
El Yes XNo
ElJQ Yes No
[:]Yes 2rNo
El Yes ;2"No
El Yes e No
ai to no �fy regiona Q o emergency si ua ions as require y enera erin
❑ Yes
f2"N'o
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,LJ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�lo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
10
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Use;dre
ritloni'Aus
d Copy ❑ Final Notes
'Dr., T-A I\-t0 f4-Tf s o3� P(; . 3 '50 - „f j � t T_ R44 s a _"r.r+" �s
qEw 7-. L3E initpu._m�erw 4;l , w T)N- t ss A'4cE� ?3� TAB PXp"tT-,
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
JNr A
Date:
05103101
Continued

Facility Number:) — bate of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below ❑ Yes P(No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Vo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes;'No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 14
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑/es
No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ No
�. �huna . °ommentsMan ors Faw nhg.• ;.... .:. ^''� ..... � +w�.�f r
aCAz. S tiati 4
AL
�Q IF
%P J
f3C-r.�C.) L
-fQArJS F 'S aF- W A 5 t
'� 54c-if�ry
�►���� Sys QGt`
Ceti r--;chi W-a ; 4 MPt
a� T• y3L� �.�Q���a.C4> w�1r4 L.Eltf.�4 i S iSSD
' . a
c91- # 0.i G
L4 r% C-r£/Z- R4 pp a
,Z
05103101

-71 ►6/02
Type of Visit (Xtompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 12)/Routine 0 Complaint C) Follow up (:) Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
©ate of Visit: �l oZ time: ' J S
Facility Number �1
Not O erational Below Threshold
O ermitted 9-certified O Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thr hold:
Farm Name: L £ County: —11baha
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: E.4tz_t . "E-Fi Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0a 4 GG Longitude 0 06 0«
Design Current
Design
Current Design Current
a aci P,o u[ation
to Feeder
P,oultr...: , Ca aci
❑ La er
P.o ulWean
❑ DairyFeeder
to Finish
❑ Non -La er
❑ Non-DaiFarrow
to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
rEl
Other
Farrow to Finish
i2 2iB
Total Design Ca�aCitGilts
Total SSLW
Boars
Number of is
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Selid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste
Management System
Discharges $c Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts"or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus s�brm rage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
tructure 1 ' .Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Ad a�✓ 2s z�-.� c�._d
Freeboard (inches): .j y' A�@
❑ Yes �1
❑ Yes [Io
❑ Yes fo
❑ Yes FZrNo
❑ Yes P110
❑ Yes 124o
❑ Yes � O
Structure 6
05103101
I
Continued

Facillty Number: S —ZI Date of Inspection 7 t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ADnlication
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 40 No
❑ Yes ;ifNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 2 No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �plf4o
11, Is there evidence of over application? 4dD El Excesses Ponding El PAN El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes �J No
12. Crop type C , 9�MA?P, Aftl / S &- _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes j'eTNo
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
12''Io
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E'1<0
Required Records & Documents
Certificate
,,�__,/
17.
Fail to have of Coverage & General Permit or other Pe g�i readily available?
❑ Yes
idNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified An nal W0 to Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 1,
❑ Yes
,,��,,��
n s q J e�,�/ Z
keeping wam ��soif
El
,P<O
No
19.
Does record need improvement? (ie/ irr tion, fre6 ard, anali eampale r¢�b5ts)
Yes
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[;Vl o
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONO
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
N
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
',
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
J:;Ko
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21Io
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
2<0
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Carriments (refer In quest€on'#) Expplain any YES answers,and/or any,recommendations orlany other,comments
y r
Use drawingsof facilitytobe'tter,explaln {nse addttionalpages=as necessary)
r .re teld Copv
mal Notes
T--q, N%14.r_ C-jMA_C,. Y 'bi�
C-b,14P
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: a, U Date:
05/03/01 1 Continued

Facility Number: —TO Date of Inspection '% r Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 1plqo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes )21110
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt_, ❑ Yes ,Q�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ,®Mo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 12Wo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes J2No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ZW6
5100

type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 94foutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 1 Date c)r visit: � fi � ► 'Time:
10 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
El' -permitted ;Kertified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: C- E-e- 7-g-zx . County: J A'4 .ra-a,.t
................I—,..........................................................................p ..................................................._........ .
OwnerName: ................................................... ....................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:........................................................ .Title: Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: ................................................ . .. . .............................................................................................................................. ........................ ...........................
Onsite Representative: 9C.Er.... Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a • ii Longitude 0 4 b4
L
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
q 1 e $
Z a+s
❑ Feeder to Finish
6 IZD
.5 `f q a
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
TatAl SSLW.
„Number of Lagoons ; [] Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Sohd Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes "NNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Pf"No
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes xfNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes j2NO
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ; N
01 /01/01 Continued

r Facility Number: 5� —
Date of Inspection Z- o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;eNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structurc 6
Identifier: �i° � � (,3 o LA rI'a.! fb, 4" ..................... 0
Frecboart[ (inches) ...................................�.1..............,.......�.�...............................��......................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ❑ NO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VfNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Z No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes gNo
_Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Fl fqo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes P'No
12. Crop type G , 43C4^ j(,.)A OA-% / s- (P�-,1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes P No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
fZ
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
eNo
17. Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfteld boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Genera PJA or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ;3 No
zj r OD
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Antmil Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes Z_No
all
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri tion, fre board, wa,ste analysis & soil'�� sarttphe reports) ElYes No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes , No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONO
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by satue agency? ❑ Yes ,(No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 2"�Io
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ; No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: S) - I Date of inspection z a
Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
[]Yes ,fNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes J'No
❑ Yes [ZNo
❑ Yes d No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name r%
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
OUOI/01

, a D:Dtrns�on of Soelrarid Water,Conservahvu =. Co�ruplj'hCe InSpect>Eo t d *SI rR ! . ��y '" 'ai(
.
>E.d .3'.1 ,:i:'
i', 3 ,a€i, n3 Dev><ston Water3 , uale -, Com IianceIns ectaon 6 < € {ili d
d d t3'; , F P ttF
1 .. �.. 7,.f �,?'rB
d�
ther'A ' O e' ation Revlevr
g. yr p..
% s1� } ry h 3 It Yi IT -. iili h�tt 4 E k
(d „. ':
�i,
�. f'fi
•l.i } 3 �, �': .��-. i43 iir�}��i1
R
3: °K'. 5�.'itl�$k ...F
outine 0 Com taint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection
0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number $"
Date of Inspection Cz
Time of Inspection o; 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Aw fe
Per fitted [] Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
....................................... .....................................................................
Farm Name: Lam- �Rt�'i}1 E- I`g.
County: 4i..f?.`..'S'r'.�?.^4.......................
........
Owner Name :............................... ....................... .......
...... Phone No
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................
Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .....................................................................................................................
..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..... f9PaL-...(, E...................................................................
Integrator: ...............................................
Certified Operator:.................................................:..............................................................
Operator Certification Number: ........ ....... ...........................
Location of Farm:
.......... ... .............. ..... ............. .........
Latitude 0 9 Longitude 0 ° 64
Destgq _; Cur�kit Design Curireot,- 3ik'i' Destgn Current
Swine Capacity,Po ulation Poultry Capacity- Po `illation Cattle Ca "aci "'`Po„''nlatton'
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy t;
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
< ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish 41 Total Design. Capacity,;,,i
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars :•Total $SLW>
Number,4'La erns ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds'/Solid Tra i No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? %
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑Spray Field Other
a. If dis barge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
a. If di+
b. If discharge is obscrved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If disch ai&Js observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (ll'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: s.� 6 rJ2� ft�I'�1-I rSo
Frcebottrd (inches): .................................... ............................. ............................. .` ....................4i:..------------- --- .............................
...
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Ycvl ylCro
seepage, etc.) "�
3/23/99 Continued on back
,ryes ❑ No
❑ Yes 12'lgo
❑ Yes �o
ChAS4-n
.`Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ Yes
to
Structure 6

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the recei,
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This 'facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste am sis & soil s441e reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Rio iola�igris:o de ficiencies were h,0*(01• ii(ir'ing 3;his'visit; • Yoi1_. ili•>cec.. trio; . ... . • , .
CID res' orideit& about: this :visit:
Vol
❑ Yes )!fNo
❑ Yes •ZNo
0yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;2_1q0
❑ Yes z4�!rNo
❑ Yes 21 o
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ro
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ZN' o
❑ Yes Pf10
❑ Yes ,0/No
❑ Yes PING
❑ Yes1"ITO
❑Yes 42No
I� �,K0LfC., t OF FI.(ASlJ 9`A,dk-- Af -r,aLA aae.,4 D+D J01- AZE4c.." 14444"�A C49
bJ Asa To WAI(Lfl,"21 Tics TIaaT Set- �s�+Ar fs CQ,4'r4.^rCP AL44G wr'T�l aAA
} 4,p Q-4Cd..5eV_V Qkb FS& es!;rIvr e To 'F�-D 7 r> -
Atx.'F� �S L�S`S + a�1 ?s- is �`A-c� �Pt.C. Ar ..;e-o rrf oz-n)GGo2) rt.c,,my ni RA
R., Sv P£ r APY c,i M c �o �� �5 AS R 7 SC A-J X. 4 0L r
,
Reviewer/Inspector Name �.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - /f�_, r4 . I&V —It— Date:

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ;?"No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Arc there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes PN
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P 0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes dNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ;5�No
"o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes -,E!fNo

r
i' Division'of Soil and Water Conservation, - Operation Review
` O'Drvisyorr,of Soil and Water Conservation -Compliance Inspection
[3`Division,of Water Quality - Compliance.Inspection
'1
Other'Agency-Operation Review
�.
Routine Q Cum laint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tie of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number � Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 br. (hh:mm)
© Permitted C3 Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName . ......................... ................................................................................... County:... ....................................
Owner Name: Phone No: .................................................:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ I'Itone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................... ..........................
OnSite Representative: ..�.Ifr�.... '^ integrator:.......................................................
........Z.�.g...... ..........................A
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: 11
Latitude ° •° Longitude I t • :
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gilts
❑ Boars. Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I'l 10 Subsurface Drains Prese2LJICI Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps , ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Disch_ argU & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon [I Spray Field Zother
A,
y
,eyes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? � GY GL ❑ Yes �TNo
b. If discharge is obscrved, did it reach Water of the State? (It' yes, n+)lify DWQ) ❑ Yes alloj
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated tiow in gal/min'? S TO P16-0 W)+EAJ - &0 { hTq
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notil'y DWQ) [ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? /❑ Yes ❑ o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 14�No
Wastc Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Su•ucture S Structure
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...r� ..................................11.....................".1... ............................ ..v...... I..... ... ........... I.................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑40
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: j- / — %' Date of Inspection ,
6. Are there structures on -sire which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes dNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes VNo
8. Does any part of the waste management systc other than waste�uctures require maintenance/improvems�
ent? Yes []No
�f-•A;Ns c1
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes
/`1No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes P10
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes/No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ'with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes /No
c) This facility is pended for a wettabie acre determination? El Yes (�,NI o
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Q�1V0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes jA
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ YesNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 1,11
0
23. Did Reviewer[Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes // Vo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ElYes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �fo
�; i'Nd •yiolations;o;r dgficiertcies Were bot;ed• during 4t is;visit' • :You wiil•>^eeeiye tid further
COI'reSpond(enCe. about this :visit' : . ' . ' : ' . ' : ': ': : ' : ' : : .
C43Fk1 �F H w' ajk, z,d. "1L'� �tz
it li,j YES"answersand/or an .recommendationstor an othrcomments
omments {refie.to9uestion#) Ex lain an onapaesarexpEamsiaevvng'sf failiqetteations. (use additigsecsary)
D)`�L1f13,CG g �J-Gt✓Ep A(/t�ini �A �/�rlr r E�✓1'c7t try Ct ��4 �T��iji9i�1•�
7 1b(,( ¢2G1 '� G,9��0.✓5 , )DID t/oT !Z� .gc1t S u,er�e�f1Lve,
(iDT i�A) E`f Le!%}(re�,4) Oto I�ISGI{/3/ZG fQ I�OY, %9�ji/,�t/GC]l4 �`
1
Vi 0r1 P 13
Reviewer/inspector Name - L
Reviewer/Inspector Signature .ZO2/4,1,-V. Z__ Date:
3123/99

' Facility Number, Date of Irsspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ;ZNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes VNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes GF`No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [lo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ;?"'No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes VIo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ❑ Yes ONo
'AdditIona , oinmen nn or, ravings .s a's';�,,I}tir.`.�`''�, �?�`khEl
fo
w
3/23/99

r 1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation Review 4
QD1VISlon Of sotl an[I Water -Conservation -, Co1np11:InCe inspection-
tvision of Water; Quality Compliance Inspection h
3
1 Other Agency -Operation Review.
O Routine O Complaint O FoltoNv-tip of 1DWQ inspeetit)n O Follo+ti'-up of t)S%VC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection /6
Time EMI' Inspection z =30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
77
&PermittedCertified [] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .............oT}�E-(Z. S C onnry:........ Jan/S. Tb"t...........................................
.............................................................................................
Owner Name: Phone No: .
Facility Contact: Title• Phone No:
MailingAddress......................................................................................
Onsite Representative:.4.I� R,.t.. ,.,.5... .k...................... .... ... Integrator:....! 11-� �L/.1..........................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude • �' �"
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
3 O7
❑ Feeder to Finish
I Zo
❑ Farrow to Wean
5�
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.... ...... -------------
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer JE1 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total. Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present I ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System 71
Discharges & Stream Impact�4
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II` discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made:'
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is ohserved. what is the estimated [low in gal/thin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Structure 2
Structure 3
Structure 4 Structure 5
ldentificr: IJgAS£di
47AX"e.jrOIG
i-1,J'5NI :I(,
1Se L.AT'ca/I
Freeboard (inches)..............�3,.,�5...,..................3.:..Z•.
..............'Z-;2'.
.r..................
-...................._.................... .........
❑ Yes zNo
❑ Yes Z No
[:]Yes VNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes [a'No
❑ Yes PNo
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

3.
Facility Number:. 151 — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and rninimum
liquid level elevation markings?
16
❑ Yes PK
❑ Yes 2fNo
❑ Yes ,rNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes WNo
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑Yes PTIo
• B zszn J O ll�
12. Crop type .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
N�o.v'Wations -or. deficiencies .were rioted. during .this-visit...You valfretceive na further. -...
eorrespaidenee; about; this visit :..:.. : . . . .
Uqa ) p any y,eco mmen ationY
s or any.other
Comments r, omme
sea(fflrawirigs oacity to better ex lain'stuatons {use additio al ages as necessary):
❑ Yes ,&No
❑ Yes ;YNo
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes ONO
2''Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes ;2 No
❑ Yes Vl' o
❑ Yes Ofio
❑ Yes Ca"No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ,`No
1
Pc� A -,q or r--Aar 4jj Gz04C.R_,4 t~ 'PCR,,, r, dN trAf- FPAM.
3� S,r,o.V- 'rd r—M♦ UP 01'_rM OEIEl-Ly r4q--0, AQD L,"Ct ILoG .
t2><tAt-i %CAI SmAet., 01 `OE)r�'r_p r/ t,,s.u, P. W4. TrCP.l FD(L- F"U_, AC� �+va Wo
LAy�� d-Iw— ts,n.r Pl'PE Ar N 'l-2AUrC_UEa-]
i?r. R-A66fp qz�a2 wcvf-A6(t c Ate,
3E soe_� ra ALLoW �F-- 17Afti -- tool 4;;F(--� Fezo^ a-,Li-S n1640./,.' SPxAll
P►'P& r;/Ta L►46on•✓.r
Reviewer/inspector Name 'ro J �j 4 . A UA T- S 7 1 tf'--ro
Revi ewer/[ nspector Signature: ta4c_- ,) ' i ,,,,,,---- Date: 3J rb� Qq 11/6/99

[ 0 / 15 Gcl=0� >,)4, (e�
QrRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other J
Facility Number l Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered E2rCertified 0 Applied for Permit E Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated;
Farm Name: ........ '-�%�..... ...................................F:.!'a-m...................... County:..........,. ?.`'l.R .. ...................
Owner Name:........... 1^il„Y 4........... 4-�.,.......................... ....................................... Phone No:...�. .J� ....5.�. ... ....... .................
Facility Contact: ....... EJYJ......... .. Title: .......................... Phone No:
2 4 S �D�!'eS �^
Mailing Address: 1 '�. .......... .... ..... .ur....�C ........M-C, .2�.7.2y
Onsite Representative:........i........ �— ........... Integrator :.............. .............
Certified Operator, .............. 1..--.w..L .L�............................................ Operator Certification Number ;...... ----........-
Location of Farm:
F........................................... .............................................. ....................................................................... ..........................................................................................................
, ,
Latitude ©a ' " Longitude ®• ©S "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 12<0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/hoiding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the. facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes
O/No
❑ Yes
Q/No
❑ Yes
Mo
❑ Yes
GI-fio
❑ Yes
Mo
❑ Yes
No
Continued on back

a L.,
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes [INo
Structures (Laeoons.Holdini! Ponds. -Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes d No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:..i'+lr .... M ..3i.{r�.......................................................................
........ .....0 ��. -. ".......c r
Freeboard(ft): R...........0....................f ��..... I ............. ............... �:.•..3.......... ........`[a.5.............. ........................... ......... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes E1 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes UNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes O No
(If in excess of WMP or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Jd�,4,�-ram
15. Crap type G.............................. ......... .....................-...................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ElYes [No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ld'No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Q No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
BNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same'agency?
❑ Yes
9-/Io
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[allo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
B/No
For Ceilified or Permitted Facilities Only,.,�
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
M No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Q,, o
25,
Zere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
f5NO
No.vitilitions.az dif ciencies.were-noted-dufiiig this: visit. , Yoit.�iil1, i-&eive,rta_further,:
:.
correspbndeitce about -this: visit:- : - : - :::.: - , - . : :. - . ; ; . - ; . ' • .. - . . • . . , . • : • ... • - -', - : .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: u M . ]SL,_,411 Date:

ti
Division of'Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
❑ Division U NN"ater Quality
O Routine O Cont laint O Fi)llmti-u at' DNN"Q inspt•ction O Follow-u of DS"'C review O Other
i Date of Inspection
Facility .\"umber
Time of Inspection / , / l 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Registered ❑ Certified ❑ Applied for Permit Q Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Z' Farm Name,. ...........................
`%" County: ............/!.r. L... .....................................................
1:...L..!!....::../..�..!7
Owrner Name: ................................................. Phone \a:...............
Facility Contact: ......................................... ........ Title...................,. .... Phrrne No:
MailingAddress: ............... ............... .................. ................. ............................................................................... ..........................
1 �
Onsite Representative, ..... ,...4.P %.........^:............ Integrator:......... f:....��.................................................
Certified Operator;..........."..........."............................................................ ... Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm:
Latitude �• �� �: Longitude �• �` �`:
Swine.-::
Q Wean to Fe
Design "Current Design; - Current Design, ',.Current.,,.,
Capacity Population, . Poultry Capacity Population. , Cattle Capacity,, Population,
eder
1 p ;
Feeder to Finish
Zj
O-Varrow to Wean
[ r
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons l HnldtngsPonds ❑ subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Feld Area
No Liquid Waste Management System r 1
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ElSpray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Dues any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[,No
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ Yes
['No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes 0 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?

Facility Number:
LL78. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoonsaolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: U ytj l- l�1
........... ...........................��.........� ............................� ...
Freeboard(ft):.... :n...... Z�............... ... ....... . t...I....................!...... �..:............ ..........`:........ ....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of%WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type , of... ..�'1. ... U..Q..---,A
...............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated.in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onh
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violations or deficiencies.were,itoted;during this. visit., You.wi11 recei've_no further,::
corresp6hdeke about this:visit::
❑ Yes ,EfNo
❑ Yes ,5 No
OYes ❑ No
❑ Yes J3`No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes b No
❑ Yes LI No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes F]"No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes J� No
❑ Yes A�No
❑ Yes [ T<o
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes dNo
�x lcf�>%C�t? /i� .4bll T` �~i�5lX.v
� ,N e N{D 1'l'1 U h G-lh, %, /11Lf3`,45 Al 65,V r7ia-O �L- t4-5 7-
P/3 Tz- D >11/ ] s o, 77 �-J 1 G-o oti r"ff/�r ti-� G� r� s ES 1-79i$ C
L! . �U P i� f N ✓"I 4 p _ �ii��h! ov�1 ��+� tl�y�
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name

MW
99s is: 26 ERor9 DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P•02/02
Site Requires immediate Attend on _
Facility No. _ 5-
Dl VISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SI`M VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 0Z �, 1995
Time: _
i Name/owner: if' of r eC
ing Address: 12 lfs Ga-& _vr�7_14 +9.,1IV C .,11,7S��1
County- _ Y k Hs 7'—flL_.Y„ — — 1. T� a-- ` ]-
Integrator: _ . Ta A h "cC4 - - - Phone: f 9 - s-&83
On Site Representative: _ L Phone: _ 909 e9* 8w
Physical AddresslLocadon: J�ida, r .%.s���r G•, w 9G` d- Nwi /�v o E '�4 •. ,
roy is- 1ST sue( SR l /CL� .- jZa f " ( �. a% Got c i1sr
Type of Operation Swine _LZ� Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity. 22'2:• Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNE*r
Latitude: Longitude: _ Elevation: eet
Circle Yes or No
Des the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) & or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or& Was any erosion observed? Yes or(9
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? 0 or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?200 Feet from Dwellings? (D or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No nv s -el/s spp ti
a: zImal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Nlap Blue Line? Yes or No if y hkl-11�k
ani.r-nal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
.0mila.r rnan-anode devices? Yes or If Y ws. Please Explain.
uic facility in=' lain adequate waste niauaberncrzt records (v011ill]es of rzianuze, land applied.
spray it igated' on spccific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes or No 4 Y kk�
Additional Comments: e,, s;ie S•,A, e a S
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Sign e a_40&�_
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL. P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources �is
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor MCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NORT►, cAROuNA DEPnRTMeNT or
ENVIRONMENT AND NAURAL Rr-scmJRcEs
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 6, 1997
Mr. Earl Lee
1245 Oak Forest Road
Four Oaks, North Carolina 27524
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-4
Lee Brothers Swine Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Lee:
On October 3, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely,
IIA
u y arrett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledl10% pod -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection !o }
1 J Time of Inspection /S 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑,Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
[( Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............ __................ _..... _...... .........__.............................. _..... _........ ........ ......................
FarmName: ............. � %re r&'. 1 County:..........�s..............._......................................................._. p.................._.......................................
Land Owner Name:...._ �..._.�.. N -s........ L c:.e:................................, Phone No:..._lil..........4...��.Y..:.. 3 D................ ............
Facility Conctact:.......Elf ... (.......... 1:Kt'__............................... _... Title: Phone No: .....
i9.....�.i..'8���
IVfailingAddress:.....� Z`1 �..5.........Q- r.......��`. 2y
« !t................................................ ........
Onsite Representative::..... t.:.'..i............ Lt.fr......................................................... Integrator:...........4.ae/!.es z.J�......................................
Certified Operator:......._! f..l......LS'.�..........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude =*='=" Longitude =* =, =,,
vcHyK ai
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface W,.ter? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/9? maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes B<e
❑ Yes M*o
❑ Yes E]-T o
❑ Yes BJ" o
❑ Yes MV6
❑ Yes �LQNo
❑ Yes 21� 0
❑ Yes 2-go'
Continued on back

k
Facility Number: _(" —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the'time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding- Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1
Structure 2
Structure 3
Structure 4
S.o
...........� :0.......................�
-. ...........................
.........................4...�.............I
tvKrS< < f
Sa LJ
10. Is seepage observed from any
of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D"1Q)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes 63/No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure 6
............. ...... ........ I ...................
.,...
❑ Yes E lJo
❑ Yes B- o
❑ Yes Bi o
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type `.i..............................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
, Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signati
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes E3No
...................................
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
�io
ED No
❑ Yes
BNo~
❑ Yes
6 tvo
❑ Yes
RK10
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes &'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RNO
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit ' 4/30/97

,7UL-14-1995 15:26 FROI
R Q.UALITY SECTIO RRO P.02/02
Site Requires-Imme&ate A,tennicn.
Facility No.
DIVTSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE' VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Farm Narne/Owiat
Mailing Address:. r ,/ Kr.(' . - _ �o u � - 524,f'y 1J C G 7Sz �f
County: _ S_ ��n_
Integrator.. Pnone: .
On Site Representative: �.15 _ _ __ -- Phone: f i -
Physical AddressfLocadon:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultsy Cattle
Design Capacity: A0, mi-p , _ _ Number of Ariitnals on Site;
DELI Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' �' Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient. free -board of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Gor No Actual Freeboard: 2 Ft. �- - Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or @ Was any erosion observed? Yes ore
Is adequate land available for spray? �or No 1s the cover crop adequate? Yes . No
,
Cmp(s) being utilized: Scs.
Does the facility meet S S minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from- Dwellings?' Yes' or No
100 Feet from Wells?` Yes or No
-Xehe anirnat waste stockpiled within, 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes.or No
xtimal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes:orNo
ani-mal waste discharged into waters of the state. by inan-made ditch, flushing system; or other
;!Tnilax man -made -de -vices? Yes ot(�;y If Yes. Please Explain.
4.
Dae6ihc: f_tcility maintain adequate waste managerncllt records (volumes of'rxianure, land°applied
spt uy angated on specific acreage with cover. crop) : Yes
Additional Corrunents:
f
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
-Use Attachments if Needed:
TOTAL P.O2

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO R.02ie2
Site Requires Immediate Attendor
Facility No. .S'1 N _
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANA.GENMNFT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 0 7 2C S , 1995
Time:
Rarm Name/Owner: -e 4 at` v'-r 1 2 a e
Mailing Address: ,,. 124f�' C7QkF rFeyl`R _ Fopr C101b Z 2572y
County-
I�ryt_ - Tc �a1y7PC /a�co+ts_ o r1 Sit
Integrator. __ ,rn M yrreA0g,- Phone:-?
On Site Representative: A -ePhone: 7(�r/ 9 33'C,
Physical Address/Location: Fr i�fevsrc '�ti hr�. _96_ X,-n-,yN_a�
oceerbx /so f'ficiff _sR h '- is fir &raoel la. an r;c 47� .
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �1 22 2 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM-Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:Fee[
Circle Yes or No
Does the .Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot -t 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 9 or No Actual Freeboard: ._.__Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed froth the lagoou(s)? Yes or No Was any emsidn observed? Yes or1
Is adequate land available for spray? Uee or No Is the cover crop adequate? 0 or No
Crop(s) being utilized: �:;,q hu�a eS
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria"? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Ge or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No no wells xe's-1
animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ore
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS i11ap Blue Line'?
Yes or Na u h hrt---�
animal waste discharged into waters of the slate by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or ocher
-iiTni13T man-made devices? Yes or(9 if Yts, Please Explain.
r:te:ility tuaimain adequate Waste managemenr records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: _ - k�90141 dw s, a
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Si
ure
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02
AN

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 51-4 County: Johnston
Facility Name: Lee Brothers Farm
Certified Operator Name: Earl Lee Operator Number: 16435
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Finish Nur ISO Sow
N N N N
17 14 18 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with 'related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
cif animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 1011312016
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
Earl Lee Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
919422-2319
11/7/2016

r
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: Finish
line m =
1295.0 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: Nur
line m =
302.9 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID: ISO
line m =
18.5 lb PAN
4.
Structure 1D: Sow
line m =
411.9 lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
in. lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 2028.3lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r, acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
It. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window
1A
small grain overseeed
2.09
50.00
104.5
SEP-APR
1 B
small grain overseeed
8.57
50.00
428.5
SEP-APR
1 C
small grain overseeed
5.71
50.00
285.5
SEP-APR
1 D
small grain overseeed
4.93
50.00
246.5
SEP-APR
2A
small grain overseeed
3.50
50.00
175.0
2B
small grain overseeed
3.81
50.00
190.5
2C
small. rain overseeed
4.76
50.00
238.0
2D
small grain overseeed
4.38
50.00
219.0
2E
small grain overseeed
4.17
50.00
208.5
2F
small grain overseeed
3.92
50.00
196.0
2G
small grain overseeed
4.52
50.00
226.0
2H
small grain overseeed
0.71
50.00
35.5
21
small grain overseeed
1.45
50.00
72.5
2J
small grain overseeed
1.54
50.00
77.0
2N
small grain overseeed
0.59
50.00
29.5
3A
small grain overseeed
4.12
50.00
206.0
313
small grain overseeed
1.56
50.00
78.0
3C
small grain overseeed
1.45
50.00
72.5
3D
small grain overseeed
0.721
50.001
36.0
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3125.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 2028.3 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 3125.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) -1097 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Application onto existing spray fields began as weather and field conditions permited. All lagoons are now in
compliance.
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 13.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 6.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 64666 1ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3 241851 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft3
h, current herd # 800 certified herd # 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/7/2016
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
84593 ft'
L 0Jft3
39783 ft3
155055 gallons
1.067 Ibs11000 gal.
420.7 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 47952 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 209231 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft3
h. current herd # 800 certified herd #1 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 84593 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 9/7/2016
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
Oft3
29925 ft3
142766 gallons
1.06 Ibs11000 gal.
373.1 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 51-4
Facility Name:
Lee Brothers Farm
County: Johnston
Certified Operator Name: Earl Lee Operator Number: 16435
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Finish Nur ISO Sow
N N N N
17 14 18 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site•locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
cif animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
10/13/2016
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
POA & Plan Amendment completed by Curtis Barwick, Technical Specialist
Earl Lee Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 11 /7/2016
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 12
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 47952 ftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 209231 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 84593 ft3
h. current herd # 8001 certified herd #1 800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 dayslline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/7/2016
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
84593 ft's
ft3
29925 ft3
142766 gallons
1 -061 Ibs11000 gal.
373.1 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

.eh
A Po 0
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING PAN AND TONS OF WASTE
FROM COMBINATION SWINE OPERATIONS
Operation Code: 6 Combination Swine Farm
APPLICATION METHOD: I Irrigation
Type Operation Number Tons Waste PAN
Animals per Animal per an.
NUMBER OF -WEAN TO FEEDER PIGS: 4108 .40 .48
NUMBER OF FEEDER TO FINISH HOGS: 6120 1.9 2.3
NUMBER OF FARROW TO WEAN SOWS: 2000 6.1 5.4
NUMBER OF FARROW TO FEEDER SOWS: 0 7.3 6.5
NUMBER OF FARROW TO FINISH SOWS: 0 19.9 26
TOTAL NUMBER ANIMALS: 12228
TONS OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR:
RECEIVED ! DENR ! DWQ
WEAN TO FEEDER:
1643.2 tons
AQU ff R'PRAMT10 RECTION
FEEDER TO FINISH:
11628 tons
MAR 23 2009
FARROW TO WEAN:
12200 tons
FARROW TO FEEDER:
0 tons
FARROW TO FINISH:
0 tons
TOTAL WASTE:
25471.2 tons
PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER:
1971.84 lbs
FEEDER TO FINISH:
14076 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN:
10800 lbs
FARROW TO FEEDER:
0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH:
0 lbs
TOTAL PAN:
26847
AVERAGE TONS OF WASTE PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 2.08300621524
AVERAGE PAN PRODUCED PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 2.19553483808
;LUDGE PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR: BROADCAST
WEAN TO FEEDER: 312.208 lbs
FEEDER TO FINISH: 2264.4 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN: 1760 lbs
FARROW TO FEEDER: 0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 lbs
TOTAL SLUDGE PAN: 4336.608 lbs
VERAGE SLUDGE PAN PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 0.354645731109

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: EARL LEE
Location: 124S OAK FOREST ROAD
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Combination swine Farm
Number of Animals: 12228.00 swine
(Design capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H
Management Commission.
carried out, meets the requirements
.0217 adopted by the Environmental
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
12228 swine x 2.08300621524 tons waste/swine/year = 25471 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
12228 swine x 2.19553483808 lbs PAN/swine/year = 26847 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
---
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3752
1A
BnA
BH
8
400
0
2.09
836
I
APR-SEP
3752
1A
BnA
SG
1
0
I
150
12.09
1104.5
OCT.MAR
3752
1B
BnA
BH
8
0
8.57
li
1400
13428
APR-SEP
3752
--1B
BnA
5G
1
0
T
150
18-57
1428.5
OCT.MAR
"752,469
1C
BnA
BH
8
0
I
1400
15.71
12284
APR-SEP
3752,469
-1C
BnA
SG
1
50
0
T
15.71
1285.5
OCT.MAR
3752,469
1D
BnA
BH
8
0
I
1400
14.93
11972
APR-SEP
3752,469
BnA
SG
1
0
1-ID
li
150
14.93
1246.5
OCT.MAR
3752
2A
BnA
BH
$
0
I
1400
�3.5
11400
APR-SEP
3752
�2A
BnA
SG
1
0
li
150
13.5
1175
OCT.MAR
3752
2B
BnA
BH
8
0
I
1400
1-3-81
11524
APR-SEP
3752
�2B __jBnA
SG
1
0
li
150
13.81
1190.5
OCT.MAR
2752
2C
BnA
8
0
r.
I
JBH
I
1400
�4.76
11904
APR-SEP
j-752
--2C
jBnA
JSG
11
150
10
14.76
1238
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I
I
j
I
I
IOCT. MAR
3752
2D
BnA
BH
8
0
I
1400
14.38
11752
APR-SEP
3752
-2D
BnA
SG
1
0
li
150
14.38
1219
OCT.MAR
3752
2E
BnA
BH
8
0
li
1400
14-17
11668
APR-SEP
3752
�2E
BnA
SG
1
0
I
150
14.17
1208.5
OCT.MAR
3752
2F
BnA
8
0
JBH
I
1400
13.92
11568
APR-SEP
3752
-2F
BnA
SG
I
li
15b
jo
13-92
1196
OCT.MAR
3752
2G
BnA
BH
8
0
I
1400
14.52
11808
APR--SEP
"-752
-2G
BnA
SG
1
0
I
150
14.52
1226
OCT.MAR
3752
2H
UCC
BH
$
0
I
1400
10.71
1284
APR.SEP
3752,469
21
UCC
BH
8
0
I
4
1400
11-45
1590
APR.SEP
3752,469
2J
{ BH
8
0
jUcC
)1 I
1400
11.54
1616
APR.SEP
3752
2L
BnA
BH
0
I
IS
1400
10.68
1352
APR-SEP
3752
2N
BnA
BH
8
400
0
li
I
I
10-59
1236
APR-SEP
3752
3A
BnA
BH
0
I
IS
1400
14.12
11648
APR-SEP
3752
-3A
BnA
SG
1
0
I
150
14.12
1206
OCT.MAR
3752
3B
UcC
BH
8
400
0
I
11.56
1624
APR.SEP
3752 13C
jBnA
JBH
18
J400
10
1.45
1580
Page: 4

i
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
iI I I I IAPR-SEP
3752 3D Ucc BH IS 1400 0 10.72 1288
I APR.SEP
END
I
_kc,4
TOTAL128076
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to'be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand -of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding. :
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
50
50
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
TABLE 1
1-1� TABLE 2
TOTAL
*-A
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
63.38
28076
0
0
63.38
28076
* BALANCE
-1229
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
�,�4.0 /C � T7�.✓ � �' Gr/f�s � i S G a m �c r- x � �r � � r�-� �ufi��' ati'
�ri'iG�'t`"•'r .�/� �� �c-3 � �•��3s4r�� ETC TfiS/�� ���" ?�lwii�'rz,; .� �C
�rG:Zo03 G•- e Tr`f 6 t/�-7�'�✓ �'u r �S �,,f E .s'�`T e7/`! T�J /¢%A�� R/1 �e"'�� T�9�/
D •. �5 l'11� � /,rC3 /ac=�' �yk�►q' f�-rv'� j �i+/�h� �'��' ,¢,�,Pcr cf�'rTirY �jvG— %—��
��,�iyl�rlc�'n'!✓,✓71F5, fir/�°L'�c-�i �ilU.y!/'{� bs�E�E /��+�.�i�-� ir77
�� ���,E c*�-Cruel'
�.a�F r���Er�r�z7� c f��°��-y Gt•�' ;a
�-
r �
page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter straps along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract Field Soil Type
2752 2C BnA
1
3752 lA BnA
Crop
f
BH
1
BH
Application Rate[Applic. Amount
(in/hr) I (inches)
0.75
0.75
*1
*1
Page: a

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3752
f 1B
f
I BnA
I BH
3752
2A
I
I BnA
I BH
3752
I
12B
1
f BnA
BH
3752
f 2D
I BnA
I BH
3752
I
j 2E
1
BnA
I BH
3752
f 2F
BnA
BH
3752
12G
I BnA
I BH
3752
12H
f Ucc
BH
3752
f
2L
f BnA
I BH
3752
f 2N
1
I BnA
BH
3752
f 3A
I BnA
f BH
3752
I
13B
I
Ucc
�
I
I BH
I
I
0.75
I *1
I
I 0.75
I
I *1
I 0.75
I *1
0.75
I *1
0.75
I
*1
0.75
I *1
I
f 0.75
*1
I 0.6
I
I *1
f 0_75
I *1
I
I 0.75
I
*1
I
I 0.75
*1
I
0.6
I *1
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3752
3C
BnA
I BH
I 0.75
I *1
3752
3D
UCC
I BH
0.6
I *1
3752
-1A
BnA
SG
0.75
I *0.5
3752
--1B
BnA
j SG
0.75
*0.5
3752
-2A
BnA
SG
0.75
*0.5
1
3752
-2B
I
BnA
I
SG
I
0.75
1
*0.5
~�52
--2C
1 BnA
SG
0.75
*0.5
3752
-2D
BnA
j SG
0.75
*0.5
3752
-2E
BnA
I SG
0.75
I *0.5
t
3752
-2F
�
BnA
f
SG
0.75
*0.5
3752 I
-2G
BnA
SG
I 0.75
*0.5
3752 I
-3A
BnA
SG
0.75
I *0.5
3752,41
1C
I BnA
BH
I 0.75
*1
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I— N
3752,41 1D 1
1
3752,41 21 1
1 1
3752,41 2J I
1 1
3752,41 -1C I
1
3752,41 -ID I
1
BnA
Ucc
Ucc
BnA
BnA
BH
0.75
I *1
�
1 BH
1
0.6
I *1
BH
1 0.6
I *1
i
I SG
I
I 0.75
I
1 *0.5
1
I SG
I
I 0.75
i
1 *0.5
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�f7Li s � �.Hr✓ i y ��-�` rvr° is <r s� .yd d /6s ��= .ter �'dr-,cn� .���P ���t .
l r7 i
%�'� L.�i✓�4c�,yC�' .5' L: - ,� �-r��' .; ia~rf-T�� T ,�'��.�rrl/•7 �'�� rl� r
�%✓�kl..ylrsivl
L2-7J es�% %- ,i�vG'cr C- c / �-d,-✓ �1,� �f�� �vr
• � ��d 1' d� 5r-17�CC..
]-[i ..t �E" lG- h`/may S ��d ✓ r
�y.¢T T Ham'
.� Ev�'h`'L �'E7L� 5 T/�il'alrJ ��rl•��-C ,��Yld �r.v; � d.� ici.3�-S� i�� tyc:e�/L.,�fi�✓a
� .m/�"/�r.vir 7 �vc�i/d�-�y✓ey
v � �'rJG—Tc�¢�y', J �h`�' !J t�7`S'/dam or✓ —�
�(a t,~ / „-4 S �'!�" a c�.�TS dam• lri, i 4;"3EC"c_ r�s
6AP Cl/ AJ Al 7-
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. An new swtine facility sited on or after October 1 1995 shall
Y Y
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine wastelfrom facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 -- Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 14

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct. human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: is

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:LEE SWINE FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
,--� Name of Facility Owner: EARL LEE
(Please print)-00
Signature: �` Date: f U
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please print)Kenneth York
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: 2 �` Date: /;�?, " /~ Cd
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
1-1, I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Term of Agreement:
Date:
Date:
,19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 17

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: i8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 19

T 'fit
��_6 .-. o�s�'{E� �tp� - - •gyps a �._._._��� ....
7g-
rp
36o
I ro .
Ire)
a 9
.71
f
ly
gam�--
2 A/
f ___-.3
3
'
L5
y

��F W arFpP Michael F. Easley, Governor
`o G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary O
Uj North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources �\
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
August 11, 2008
Earl Lee
Lee Brothers Farm
1245 Oak Forest Rd
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Subject: Sludge Compliance Requirement Change
Dear Permittee:
__
—1?
IF-
1 1
a;_ G 13
I DMIR RAt_LIG[{ RLG,4; OFFICE
In accordance with Condition I1I.19 of State General Permit AWG 100000, your facility is
required to maintain compliance regarding sludge accumulation in your animal waste treatment
lagoon(s). As you know, the previous compliance limit was to have a minimum of four (4) feet
of treatment depth between the designed stop pump and the average elevation of the top of the
sludge blanket. This requirement was based on NRCS Standard No. 359, which was recently
modified.
As of July 2008, Standard No. 359 does not use the 4-foot requirement. Sludge compliance is
now to be based on the sludge volume as a percentage of the total treatment volume. The revised
Standard states that sludge accumulation in the permanent treatment zone must be less than 50%
of the planned treatment volume. Also, there must be a minimum of 2.5 feet of liquid above the
sludge at the pump intake location. If either of these conditions is not met then sludge must be
removed or managed in accordance with an approved Plan of Action for Lagoon Sludge
Reduction (POA). A new sludge survey worksheet has been developed to calculate sludge and
treatment volumes to determine compliance.
Our records indicate that you have filed a Sludge POA for one or more of the lagoons at your
facility. Based on the changes to the sludge requirements in Standard No. 359, your lagoon(s)
may already be in compliance without any sludge removal. Using your lagoon design (or as -
built information) and current sludge survey measurements, complete the NEW sludge survey
workshect. If you have any difficulty in locating or understanding your lagoon design
information, please contact your technical specialist or county Soil & Water office.
Nnne r hcarolina
Naturallil
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwatMuality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110%a Post Consumer Paper

Send both sludge survey worksheets, OLD and NEW, to the address below if you feel that your
lagoon(s) is in compliance and wish to withdraw your POA. Our staff will review the
information and notify you of our decision.
NCDENR -- DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
If you have any questions about the new sludge requirement, sludge survey worksheet, or any
related matter please feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-
3221.
Sincerely,
Tad &�- �-
Keith Larick, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - AWS510004

AOF W A r�RQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
illiam G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment andNatural Resources
-� Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
1
July 1, 2007
Earl Wood Lee I"
�U�
Lee Brothers Farm L
1245 Oak Forest Rd �1l __ J
Four Oaks, NC 27524 I___-- R
RAL[iGH'AL uFFlCE
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510004
Lee Brothers Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Earl Wood Lee:
In accordance with your application received on 30-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Earl Wood Lee, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Lee Brothers Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 6120 f Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 4108 ' Farrow to Wean: 2000 � Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitY.or> Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal opportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
Nam` Carolina
Natima!!y
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS510004

j d y
lam �j '� (t , � vt-
� f f �
! / / Y e( c -1 c' " v`.� ►roc / 1
f d� ��-dli[ �t l Wan
7� �-e f -� k15.
Nutrient Management For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan -has been prepared for:
Lee Brothers Farm
Earl Lee
1245' Oak Forest Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
919-894-3248
02-11-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Edward Humphrey
NRCS
806 North Street
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156 x. 3
Developer Signature k
Type of Plan: . Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture- Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Wgter CIonservati4—car"iission.
Plan Approved By:
---------------------- - .
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-11-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 784,628 gals/year by a
4,108 animal Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1807
Incorporated
3104
Injected
3418
Irrigated
1964
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
2,115.62
845,064
-60,436
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 5,673,240 gals/year
by a 6,120 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
13067
Incorporated
22441
Injected
24713
Irrigated
14203
i
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
14,682.58
5,864,825
-191,585
----------------------------------------------------------- -----
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
425274 ' Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Source Page I of 2

I
S9
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid waste generated 6,406,000
gals/year by a 2,000 animal Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9885
Incorporated
16977
Injected
18696
Irrigated
10745
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
1 i,198.80
6,676,506
-270,506
-`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
Note: 1n source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
425274 1 1 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Source Page 2 of 2
3

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crons Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
3752
IA
N/A
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
1B
N/A
jBlanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
lC
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
lD
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2A
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2B
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2C
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
21)
NIA
Boiac
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2E
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2F
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
37521
2G
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2H
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
21
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
21
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
21,
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2N
N/A
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
3A
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
3B
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
'25274 Database Version 2.0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
I
Date Printed: 01-17-2003
PCS Page 1 of 2

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Se uence
RYE
3752
3C
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8,0 Tons
3752
3D
N/A
Blanton
Small Crain Overseed
1,0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
L1
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
utrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
;25274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
-applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract I
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres I
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
I N
N
I N
I Ibs/A
1000
gal1A I
tons
1000 gals
toffs
3752
]A
S5
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/311
50
0
0
brig.
4
1.60
0
3.34
0.00
3752
IA
S7
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
21.71
0.00
3752
IA
S9
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
24.92
0.00
3752
IA
S5
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
1 *400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
25.05
0.00
3752
IA
S7
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
175.32
0.00
3752
IA
S9
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
160
95.39
0
199.36
0.00
3752
1B
S5
I Blanton
9.00
8.57
1 Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrip.
4
1.60
0
13.69
0.00
37521
1B
S7
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tonsl
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
261
10.39
D
89.00
0.00
3752
1B
S9
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
102.19
0.00
3752
1B
S5
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Imp.
30
11.98
0
102.70
0.00
3752
1B
S7
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Hybrid Bennudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
718.87
0.00
------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Page i
CN N
_�_ 0 C'-' , __,� f

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract I
Field
Source
I.D. i
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres 1
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
IbslA
1000
gaUA
tons
1000 eals I
tons
3752
1B
S9
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
817.48
0.00
3752
IC
SS
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
9.12
0.00
3752
1C
S7
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
. 59.30
0.00
3752
1C
S9
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
I L92
0
68.08
0.00
3752
1C
S5
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
68.42
0.00
3752
1C
S7
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
478.97
0.00
3752
1C
S9 -
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
544.67
0.00
37521
1D
SS
Blanton
5.25
4.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
4
1.60
0
7.88
0.00
3752
1D
S7
Blanton
5.25
4.93
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
1039
0
51.20
0.00
3752
1D
S9
Blanton
5.25
4.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
58.78
0.00
3752
I
S5
Blanton
5.25
4.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
•8.0 Tons
311-9130
•400
0
0
Irrig,
30
11.98
0
59.08
0.00
37521
1D
S7
Blanton
5.25
4.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig_
210
83.88
0
413.54
0.00
3752
lD
S9
IRIanton
5.25
4.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
470.27
0.00
3752
2A
S5
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
Q
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
5.59
0.00
3752
2A
S7
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
36.35
0.00
3752
2A
S9
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
4133
0.00
3752
2A
S5
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
41.94
0.00
3752
2A
S7
Hlanton
3.80
3.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
293.59
0.00
3752
2A
S9
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
•400
0
0
lrrig.
160
95.39
01
333.86
0.00
3752
2B
SS
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
6.09
0.00
3752
2B
S7
Blanton
4.10
3.81
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1 1011-3131
50
a
Q
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
39.57
0.00
3752
213
S9
Blanton
4.10
3.81
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Img.
20
11.92
Of
45.43
0.00
------------------------------
425274
Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03
WUT Page 2

Waste []tili7ation Table
Year l
Tract I
Field
Source
I.D. I
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres 1
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period I
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
N
lbs/A I
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
2B
S5
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
34
11.98
0
45.66
0.00
3752
2B
S7
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
319.59
0,00
3752
2B
S9
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
160
95.39
0
- 363.43
0-00
3752
2G
SS
IBlanton
5.251
4,761
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1,60
0
7.61
0.00
3752
2C
S7
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
D
Irrilf.
26
10.39
0
49.44
0.00
3752
2C
S9
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
56.76
0.00
3752
2C
S5
Blanton
5,25
4.76
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11,98
0
57.04
0,00
3752
2G
S7
Blanton
5,25
4,76
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83,88
0
399.29
0.00
3752
2C
S9
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
454.05
0.00
3752
2D
S5
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
7.00
0.00
3752
2D
S7
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/3 t
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
45.49
0.00
3752
2D
S9
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
52.23
0.00
3752
2D
S5
Bojac.
4,65
4-38
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11,98
0
52.49
0.00
3752
2D
S7
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
367.41
1 0-00
3752
2D
S9
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
417.80
0.00
3752
2H
S5
Blanton
4.50
4.17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
E,50
0
6,66
0.00
3752
2E
S7
Blanton
4.50
4,17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
43.31
0.00
3752
2E
S9
Blanton
4.50
4,17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig-
20
11.92
0
49,72
0.00
3752
2E
SS
Blanton
4.50
4,17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
49,97
0.00
3752
2E
S7
Blanton
4,50
4,17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
349.79
0.00
3752
2E
S9
Blanton
4,50
4.17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
p
397.77
0.00
3752
2F
S5
Blanton
1 4.20
3.92
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
1 50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
6.26
0.00
---------------------------- -- ------ ---- - ---------- ----- ....------- --------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: IA7/03 WUT Page 3
0

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 eals
tons
3752
2F
S7
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
1039
0
40.71
0.00
3752
2F
S9
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
46.74
0.00
3752
2F
S5
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
46.97
0.00
3752
2F
S7
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
01
lrrig.
210
83.88
0
328.82
0.00
3752
2F
S9
Blanton
4.20
3,92
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
160
95.39
0
373.92
0.00
3752
2G
S5
Blanton
4.80
4.52
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
7.22
0.00
3752
2G
S7
Blanton
4.80
4.52
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
46.94
0-00
3752
2G
S9
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
501
0
0
brig
20
11.92
0
53.90
0.00
3752
2G
S5
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3A-9130
*400
0
0
Irrip.
30
11.98
0
54.16
0.00
3752
2G
S7
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
379.15
0.00
3752
2G
S9
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
4
431.16
0.00
3752
2H
S5
I Uchee
1.00
0.71
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
501
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
1.13
0.00
3752
2H
S7
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
25
10.39
0
7.37
0.00
3752
2H
S9
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011 -3/3 1
50
0
0
Irrig-
20
11.92
0
8.47
0.00
3752
2H
S5
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
30
11.98
0
8,51
0,00
3752
2H
S7
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tans
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
210
83.88
0
59.56
0.00
3752
2H
S9
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
4
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
67.73
0.00
3752
21
S5
Uchee
1.60
1,45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
2.32
0,00
3752
2I
S7
Uchee
1.60
1,45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.391
0
15.06
0,00
3752
2I
S9
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
17.29
0.00
3752
21
S5
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irng.
30
11.98
0
17.38
0.00
3752
2I
S7
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
1 210
83.88
0
121.63
0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Paste 4

Wncta ITfiii7ntinn Tah)P Vwar I
Tract I
Field
Souree
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A I
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
2I
S9
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
138.31
0.00
3752
2J
SS i
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
2.46
0.00
3752
2J
S7
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
- 15.99
0.00
3752
2J
S9
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
01
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
18.36
0.00
3752
2J
SS
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Hybrid Bennudagrass Hay
*9.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
18.45
0.00
3752
2J
S7
I Uchee
1.75
1.54
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
129.18
0-00
3752
2J
S9
Uebee
1.75
1.54
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
160
95.39
0
146.90
0.00
3752
2L
S5
Blanton
1.00
0-88
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
141
0.00
3752
2L
S7
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
26
10.39
0
9.14
0.00
3752
2L
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
20
11.92
0
10.49
0.00
3752
2LI
S5
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Hybrid Berntudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
01
0
Irrig.
1 30
11.98
0
10.551
0.00
3752
2L
S7
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
210
83.88
0
73.82
0.00
3752
2L
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.8$
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
83.94
0.00
3752
2N
SS
lBlanton
0.75
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/3)
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
0.94
0.00
3752
2N
S7
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
26
10.39
0
6.13
0.00
3752
2N
S9
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
7.04
0.00
3752
2N
S5
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
2N
S7
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/I 9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
2N
S9
I Blanton
0.75
0.59
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.001
0.00
3752
3A
SS
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
6.58
0.00
3752
3A
S7
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
42.79
0.00
3752
3A
S9
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
49.13
0.00
------------------------------------------------------ ---- -- ---- -- ---
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03
WUT Pale 5

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract I
Field
Source
LD. I
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres 1
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period I
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method I
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid I
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A I
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
3A
SS
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11,98
0
49.37
0.00
3752
3A
S7
Blanton
4,50
4.12
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
210
83.88
0
345.60
0.00
3752
3A
S9
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
393,00
0.00
3752
3B
S5
Uchee
1.751
1.56
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3I31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
2.491
0.00
3752
3B
S7
Uchee
1.75
1.56
Sma11 Grain 0verseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
16,20
0.00
3752
3B
S9
Uchee
1,75
1,56
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
18.60
0.00
3752
3B
SS
I Uchee
1.75
1.56
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
18.69
0.00
3752
3B
S7
Uchee
1.75
1.56
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
Q
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
130.86
0,00
3752
3B
S9
I Uchee
1.75
1.56
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3l1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
D
148.81
0.00
3752
3C
S5
Blanton
1.75
1,45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
2-32
0.00
3752
3C
S7
Blanton
1.75
1,45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
15.06
0.00
3752
3C
S9
Blanton
1.75
1.45
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
17,29
0,00
37521
3C
S5
Blanton
1.75
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
17.38
0.00
3752
3C
S7
Blanton
1-75
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
1 *8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Inig.
210
83.88
0
121.63
0.00
3752
3C
S9
Blanton
1.75
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
160
95.39
0
138.31
0.00
3752
3D
S5
Blanton
1.04
0.72
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
4
1.60
0
1.15
0.00
3752
3D
. S7
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
26
10.39
0
7.48
0.00
3752
3D
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
D
0
Irrig.
20
1192
0
8.59
0.00
3752
3D
S5
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0,00
0
0.001
0.00
3752
3D
S7
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
1 *400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
3D
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
brig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
--------------------------------------....---------- -------
425274 Database Version 2.0 . Date Printed: 1/17103 WUT Page 6

WactP TTtili,7atinn Tnhh-
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert,
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
ga1/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
13,386.39
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
12,863.87
T -
Balance, 1000 gallons
-522.52
.
Total Applied, tans
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0,00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03
WUT Page 7

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
.5
Irrigation Application Factors YNo� r
.�" rc
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
3752
1 A
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
113
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
1C
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
1 D
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2A
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2B
Blanton
0.75
0.49
3752
12C
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2D
Bojac
0.50
0.96
3752
2F
Blanton
0.75
0.49
3752
2F
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
20
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2H
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752
2I
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752
2J
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752.
2L
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2N
Blanton
0.75
0.49
3752
3A
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
3B
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752
3C
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
3D
Blanton
0.75
0.48
----------------------------------•-----.- --------------------- --
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 IAF Page I of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge- Standard
om 120 bu
150
13.16
59.26
118.53
177.79
..ay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
29.63
59.26
88.89
Soybean 40 bu
160
! 14.04
55.56
111.12
166.68
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
10.46
20.91
31.37
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
5.23
10.46
15.68
Soybean 40 bu
160
s 14.04
9.80
19.60
29.41
j Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
76.72
153.45
230.17
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
38.36
76.72
115.08
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
71.93
143.86
215.78
c
I
--------- -------------- -----------------
425274 Database Yersion 2.0
i
i
--------- ---------- --------- --------
Date Printed: 01-17-2003
Sludge Page 1 of 1
k1`

Availphie WnetP Ctnrnva Cnnacity
Source Name Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 11/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
118
1
2
96
!
3
122
1
4
142
1
5
161
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
157
1
11
133
1
12
108
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------
425274 Database Version 2,0
{
------------------------------------
Date Printed: 0 1- 17-2003
Capacity Page 2 of 3

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storave Canacitv
Source Name
Swine Farrowing-WcanljEE Lagoon Li Hid
Design Storage Ca acit (Days)
Start Date
l 1/0l
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
117
1
2
95
1
3
123
1
4
144
1
5
164
1
6
180
1
7
180
i
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
158
1
11
134
1
12
109
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
i
------------ =--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 3
l6

Available Waste Storaee Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
I Design Storage Ca aci (Days)
Start Date
1110 l
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
120
1
2
99
1
3
129
I
4
151
1
5
172
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
158
I
11
135
1
12
Ill
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Capacity Page 3 of 3
l*�

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be.applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations'° that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
1
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
'per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Teclinical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
1
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. .._ .. ..
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Page 1
La

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other thanaswine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0
------------------------------------------------------------------.--------------
Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Pa,Re 2
II

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. ' Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
V owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will `eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption, However, -if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Page 3
;LO

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate'than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
__ ;
425274 Database Version 2.0
i
i
----- ----------------------- ---- -- - ----------------------
Date Printed: 1117/03 Specification Pale 4
aI

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): IA, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2N, 3A, 3C, 3D
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2D
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain,, hybrid berrnudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal).'Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bia/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- •-------------------------------------------------------------------- •-
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2H, 2I, 2J, 3B
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermuclagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): IA, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2N, 3A, 3C, 3D
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1.-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review,theNCSU Official Variety "green book'.' and information from privatecompanies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 3
a

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2D
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2H, 2I, 2J, 3S
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
•--------------------•---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
50
50
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES I AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
63.38
28076
0
0
63.38
28076
* BALANCE
-1229
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
�r%l'.L /Gff T7o.✓ U F A145 r 4,�u��
!%I�FQPE''r .g/aZzcr-3 /•ry�si•� ETc ThS��E '�'���ifev_ ,�CC
r�-Z,OS G•• r i t/ �6 G,417X✓ .Sums �W C SET Z7� T7J /4--' i!/V
!17✓;a / I've- f /eT f�i+�crc/�'r7drre[�-r%l/�/r►-G— �`fF�
C��.nvr m� s. Wr�✓� tv�i / w E ���,�.�-� ; r � S im L C&
(1. S I �G ��� f���L f c,��/o •✓ . Tt`f �S w�S �lJrv�� 77 /kwo G E` %
�f,¢ zr¢�D G� �N�✓°r-.� ��1 ozdr�=� G�rr� Al u.' T
%/Y :��� GYIi✓T�'t' elJvn"T"/f�S �S <c?"'� i¢'S �Gl'ir/df�'
r yU i � �. ���,/-'�' 7?J 7-� c � 3 v •� � �rir��i��-•� f✓c.�,,•
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
%-/rid/5 f �° 7� J� ��rw���- h/!�s'/� G! /'l.C.rFf'! j7o.tJ Y'C./�s✓ /�d� %ri`� �/.`��/�'!
iAFT
14,0
opts c_r¢i'7�rr✓ r S .*irT
�y
,¢ t �'i �� /� �5 Ste" � rr� • r � /S /�rl�'if�i ✓T
� � S G/¢�•O O H i !��
i�G�- rye.✓ S �'1�4c. G-/i'fir�
SEvE��L ^ 4G 4 S T�}Tarti/ S. n. G c /¢iY1lJ c /H% S tl.� cr/r TE /� rr/ryrJ���ra�✓
7715o�lE is
��I�/I✓!� ��TZr/��7✓ T/rl�L� �GfGC. /�''Y.d f ffZ� Lt/VV44.�S✓d
lJct,TS1��c- /;P7P6--Y 0r✓ 771S-ec---54
�' �C � � ✓� S ��-�- r5�� D cr�rS dry Gr�i9-�i � . ���3E.A�Cc. h' h� �S
w /f'EG
i
/L---7 Eft°-
i
Page: 12

100 03:50PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX
0-0rKV57-?1W C U-
P.1/5
mendment to Include S& WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. If this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so,
2. Temporary Addition.of New 5prayfiadds O-(Check appropriate boxes.)
(] A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
(] B. acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
[] C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN J acre added.
3. summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
0 A. Application window extended for.1acres of perennial grass until first killing frost.
[] B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to 7 1 acres of perennial gaass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses Lobe harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
[] A. PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for acres of small grains or winter gasses to be harvested.
[] B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for 'L acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
5_ Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
[] A. Prior to December 1"', 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
-ior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.)" .)
B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Reauired - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of hieher seeding rates.
B. Timely ha -vest of forage to increase yield, and
C. irigatina during- periods of Warmer weather.
!. 32e_quired - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Pondinp Potential.
A. Makin_ frequent, light irrigation applications. and
B. Not irrigating irnmcdiateiy before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner/ manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the faciiity to minimi2c environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAW -MP, and avoid discitar_e to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility dis_har,es to surface waters.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a mao or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility :vurnbL .!
� Facility Name
Facility Owner / Manager Name (PRINT) ethnical S ecialist ame J N'Tj
Facility Owner / Manbecr Signature Techni 7-pecialist Signaturo
Date f �i 7 Dace
,z i
This document must be filed at the SIVCD office and be attached to'the facilities CAW'IN7P
and be available for inspection at the facility.
("`) ;vcw tcmporar}• sprayFicids n:t:st »7ect applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must rot oe _pplicd to wetlands_
11/12/1999

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
FacilityNumber - l/ Operation is flagged fora wettable
.�.L_ ..�� gg
Farm Name: t_ E-*- ovum-s acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: e L-r-g- Part/1 eligibility item(s) F9 F2, F3-f�/
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: T_Pu-Jf
Date of site visit: 3 )b
zr
Date of most recent WUP:
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
3/13
Annual farm PAN deficit: —-- pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle and -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.) .
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D203 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres,'is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (_PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
,-,F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/_setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field's acres
G (s a in excess) g
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number ' -'S / -�Z_
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' 2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
3 7 S z
r
yo.�-
r�
d`
J Z.
a �
6
uw(
o.S
.
V„/Z
2,
FIELD NUMBER'
- hydrant. pull. zone. or point numbers may be used in glace of field numbers
deoendino on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
7

f '
06/24/2009 15:01 9199895659 JOHNSTON SWCD
i
Fax Transmittal Sheet
From: Edward Humphrey, Johnston SWCD
Fax Number: 919-989-5659
Phone Number: 919-934-7156 ext. 3
Email: edwaxd.hum hre nc.nacdnet.net
To: Jane Bernard
Fax Number: 919-571-4718
Re: Earl Lee Lagoon
Total Pages: 4
Comments: Jerry Raynor asked me to fax this to you
regarding Earl Lee spillway. Any questions please call.
PAGE 01

i
I
06/24/20091 15:01 9199895659 JOHNSTON SWCD PAGE 02
IjOLD3301RO AO PAGE 01!03
Smith Mr -
Chris - Ooldii
S.
Freer' Smith, Chris - Goldsboro. ^iC
9ont Wednrdday. Jere 24, 2009 9:30 AM
Tn: I�eynof, .tarry . Smithlieid, NG
Binghem. Dean - Goldsboro, NC; Hines, Lee - Goldsboro. NC
ubleM: Ernsl$ing: N0339WTLFeb09
..I
i LY0� nk t:hi9 will an.ewer your qulatio»S on the Earl- 1.0e lagvvns.
aea'e+ pagoF 369-8 ana 339-•16.
Plenra•nA t!?e standards have Changed, back thou -de di.d sot have to store but one 25 year
Ihtcirm,
I ;,h* ,r.h.,tached drawinq chows tw*. : kno,4 Earl Lee'ss lagoons may wit have AktCside drainage
ara,4,s, but: is was coim"on pract:i.re to put emefgoney spillways an jagnona in Johr-et-on co. a.t
1 + *liar t ire . {t7i f fere nt area engineer , l T. do not knee wit! ou, locking at the dpgigne brtt I
th.irk -veI planned about a .5 fact of 4.low through the epi.11wdy.'The free -board would be the
i r?Evsti.on 9i -he @tart rumpirs elaYaClan to the crest rf the emergency spi.tlwa),, the
?r5lrage of t1ne, 25 yr, etor.m and the sgl.11way could have been in. the top fact of the
sttclRO t,>Q of, dam.NoteI In pond rw,strurtiot the real Prey board is the difference it the
si4rgery 3glii3.way flowing fUll rind tha top of, tYm gett�,Cd top Of dam.5o on a lagoon_ with a
:rte3^gency Ap.il l,way it may jult be tl a difference' in a ervatlan between Vne evert pumping
-neik and the nremr of the emergency spillwo.y, which meybo something less rhnn a Loo:•G�nn
nat found some. 1986- 159 standard* that mays the gpilkway seeds to be at least. 1 foa:
6nl- • t!ie 9ett'I,ed top of e"- ankment-1 will fax ,you this. Z never co --Id find a old drawing,
If yrna h3•rr nny cf the old 359 otanda,rds on tile ood I think the drawing that showed this
was on green rapax ,
`I hope Chia will clear th_la up.
r�hxio
nh mrsAtae i.s el 4dy to be sent with the following file or litm attachments:
Ah-"l-teat `.a: hetp:!/Veag.n.rc3.-jsda,gov/ reference o/pu61ic/NC/NC3S9W-.LFeb0q.pde
Not:-?n protect. aga-not computer viruses, a -mail programs may prevetE sending or
j rer.ei i.nra certain types of file attaehmants. Chcok your a -mail, xercurity aettingt to
let-.nrmiue iaow attachments are h*rldled.
I
} I I
I I i
i
� r
j I I it 1

i
06/24/2009 15:01 9199895659 JOHNSTON SWCD PAGE 03
r519875 30k.D590RC :+0 PAGE 0'%03
Red. Ort. 14$Q 350-7
:
Ian ajditian to the required eteaCment,welums, waeea treatment 1 ageOA shall be
provided 'with temporary scotage. The ralnimum volume of tvaporary storage'is
t.hq total of the following!
� Dr sins a Area
With OuKaide Dral�a&e,�Arsa Without Outside i
�l. Maot:xe,lweete eater and normal. 1. Manure awe waste water'
ruroif
2. Normal precipitation lvsa 2. Normal praQipi.ration less
evayoration oe'poid'surfaco. evaporation ott pond surfacel
3, 25-year, 24-hour runoff 3. 25-year, 24-hour procipirRtion
on pond surface
iACCOeuiated during 61.■ p4 rtsd haeaaae timeo of
Pxrwen effluent removal (normalLy by pumping).
;Additional storage may be provided to ingot mena;ement goals or
replariohs.
I r I
Mitt
Wears t.0armon~ lagoons Ahal,1 nat dischargR to surface waters unjeFR the owner
dece"Ines through tha state regulatory agency that such dischdrgv will not
orcravene seteblished water quality stendtirde. Lagoous having a maximum
design 114uld level of 3 feat or more above natural ground shall be provided
with en rmsrgency spillway to prrvo.nt averiopping during a 25-year. 24-bour
storm ocrvrring when th& design volume is filled, The crest of the emergency
spillway shall be at least 1 loot below the top of the settled embanlCnent.
Th11 emergency spillway shall have a minimum bottom vidrh of 4 feet and shall
paea 4 25-year. 24-houc storti wtthout overcopping the embanknent, Where
lagveno R.npty 1ntn aaace storage ponds and the liquid level .a positively
i controlled by at adequately aized over -flow pipe -- no emergency spillway le
_jgnired.
! a r Emergency spillvsys ott lagoons without a drainage area may be omitted pzcvided
the minimum elavatiurt of the seLt.led embankment top is one toot or more above
J 'the elevation of the water lava! associated with the required creatment voluike
!� ltl."• thW ere tiirec try storage,
�W . _ ....,......-___.
1 I
1 G j]
c,vr�taL^r ARV W�a Mph 1�L IUD l I
t,a i I � Ike 6eq v Fred e�f �re. o-P e rm� e fi

06/24/2009` 15:01 9199895659
JOHNSTON SWCD PAGE 04
l`.i1F1ti is :S; ' F a19751 %r E. �r�"JLU530FtL' AO
PAGE; �33lE33
159 8 Rev. oat 1966
•A
Whale sx. ess effluent !a not to be removed from the lagoon, by punxpi.ng. an
I va to
,� � raverlioy pipe shall be inatailed to diotharge irta seethes lagoon or s e .
rteragi pond. The overf low papa shall have a minlium diameter of 5 inches Red
shall have oufficiant capacity to pravaut wvbrtbppLaq' of the IagM during
ptiak inflov periods. The ovsrfloa pipe shall be installed so Chat'affluent is
diacharled [tom a minimum ref 6 inches below she surface. A "tee" pipe fitting
nt similar device an the In Let and of the averilov pipe tray be used for this
� i . � piscpoao.
�•Prctectinn
l;f the lagoon will ereate u safety hazard, It shall be fenced and worning
.,igne posted to prevent cbildr■a and others from using it fet purposea other
;i!d 'than -intended. A prttective cover of vegetation will ba established 01% all
disturbed areas. Temporary vegetation may be used until permanent vegetation
•cwn he Mote6l.iahed, Vegetation mill be established in coppliance vith 'Crit-
Seal Area tr.eetr►ene standards (342-iI) of the Technical Auide, The Lagoon
e10N, be fenced, if nQnassat:y. to protect the vegetation. Vegetative screens
or other emethods should be used to ahivld the Iagoon From public view and to
4tnnrade visual Aondi,tionn,
i
ova ration and Maintenanc
peratinn and mai.ncQnance shall be performed accatding to the written opera
lt•ien plan providoid for In the ovatall waste management plan.
Plans and. Racificatiotta
Plane end for installing waste treatment lagoona stall be in
keerine with this tscAndard and shall dascribe the requirements for applying
lthA prxettce to achieve its intended purpose.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Earl Lee
Lee Brothers Farm
1245 Oak Forest Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA251004
Lee Brothers Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Earl Lee:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on February 20, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Earl Lee, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General Permit
NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number AWS510004 to
operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWGI00000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Lee Brothers Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 4I08 Wean to Feeder, 6120 Feeder to Finish, 2000 Farrow to Wean
swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for
each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows.
Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring. data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully ,read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this_Mi-mit.__The Devices to Automatically _Stop irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
S%
NCDENR
Internet httpVh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA251004
Permit File AWS510004
NDPU Files

JA, CL..L/c
' i 1 Lcl 8-/t w L U 1,4j
etvi Ct dd '! aOvt ct Wan
r agNutrient Mana ement For
This plan has been prepared for:
Lee Brothers Farm
Earl Lee
1245 Oak Forest Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
919-894-3248
6.0 w& o j t Cam} r 4 s S rL
vI ( 30 1, (6 W 10
-o S-e v`e v'a( Ole Y-5
Animal Waste Utilization
02-11-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Edward Humphrey
NRCS
806 North Street
Smithf eld, NC 27577
919-934-7156 x.3
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Wgter (Ionservatidi-CbrWssion.
Plan Approved By:
-
-----------------------I--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-11-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 784,628 gals/year by a
4,108 animal Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1807
Incorporated
3104
Injected
3418
Irrigated
1964
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
2,115.62
845,064
-60,436
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 5,673,240 gals/year
by a 6,120 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
13067
Incorporated
22441
Injected
24713
Irrigated
14203
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
14,682.58
5,864,825
-191,585
---------- ------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Source Page 1 of 2

S9
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid waste generated 6,406,000
gals/year by a 2,000 animal Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9885
Incorporated
16977
Injected
18696
Irrigated
10745
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
11,198.80
6,676,506
-270,506
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
In source 1D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Source Page 2 of 2

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crop s Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (1.I)
Soil Series
Crc)E Sequence
RYE
3752
IA
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
37521
1 B
NIA
1131anton
Small. Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
1C
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8,0 Tons
3752
1 D
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2A
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2B
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed .
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2C
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
21)
NIA
Boiac
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2E
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8,0 Tons
3752
2F
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2G
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2H
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
21
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Nay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2I
NIA
Uchee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
2L
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8,0 Tons
3752
2N
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
3A
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3752
3B
NIA j7hee
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
1*8.0 Tons
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 PCS Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
3752
3C
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
37521
3D
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
LI
Potential Leachin&
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< = 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
parian Forest Buffers (39I).
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 PCs Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Svmbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
I Field
Source
1-17.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
I Method
Manure
I PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs1A
1000
I gallA
tons
1 1000 gals
tons
3752
IA
SS
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10l1-3131
50
0
D
IrriR.
4
1.60
0
3.34
0.00
3752
IA
S7
Blanton
2,25
2.09
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Inig,
26
10.39
0
21.71
0.00
3752
lA
S9
Blanton
2,25
2.09
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
24.92
0.00
3752
lA
S5
Blanton
2.25
2.09
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
4
0
brig.
30
11-98
0
25.05
0.00
3752
lA
S7
Blanton
2.25
2,09
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irria.
210
83.88
0
175-32
0.00
3752
IA
S9
Blanton
2.25
2-09
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irriq.
160
95.39
0
199.36
0.00
3752
IB
SS
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Small Grain Overseed
1-0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irris.
4
1.60
0
13.69
0.00
3752
1B
S7 I
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Imq,
26
10.39
0
89.00
0.00
3752
1B
S9
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrilr.
20
11.92
0
102.19
0,00
3752
1B
S5
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irriv.
30
11.99
0
102.70
0.00
3752
1B
S7
Blanton 1
9.00
8.57
Hybrid Betmudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210i
83.88
0
718.87
0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------- ...--------------------------------------------------------------------•-
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Page 1
4-
� 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract I
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres I
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
I N
I lbs1A
1000
RallA I
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
IB
S9
Blanton
9.00
8.57
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
IrriR.
160
95.39
0
817.48
0.00
3752
IC
S5
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
4
1.60
0
9.12
0.00
3752
1C
S7
Blanton
6.00
5,71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
IrriR.
26
10.39
0
59.30
0.00
3752
1C
S9
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
IrriR.
20
11.92
01
68.09
0.00
3752
IC
S5
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.99
0
68.42
0.00
3752
1C
S7
Blanton
6.00
5.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
478.97
0,00
3752
1C
S9
Blanton
6,00
5.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
IrriR.
160
95.39
0
544.67
0.00
3752
1 D
S5
Blanton
5-25
4-93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
IrriR,
4
1.60
0
7-88
0.00
3752
1D
S7
Blanton
5-25
4.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
26
10.39
0
51.20
0.00
3752
1D
S9
Blanton
5.25
4.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
58.78
0,00
3752
1D
35
Blanton
5.25
4,93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9)30
*400
0
0
brig.
30
11.98
0
59.08
0.00
37521
1D
S7
Blanton
5,25
4.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83,88
0
413.54
0.00
3752
1 D
S9
I Blanton
5.25
4.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
160
95.39
0
470.27
0.00
3752
2A
SS
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
5.59
0.00
3752
2A
S7
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
26
10.39
0
36.35
0.00
3752
2A
S9
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
41.73
0.00
3752
2A
SS
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Hybrid BerTnudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11,98
0
41,94
0.00
3752
2A
S7
Blanton
3.80
3,50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
29359
0.00
3752
2A
S9
Blanton
3.80
3.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
333.86
0.00
3752
2B
S5
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
54
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
6.09
0.00
3752
2B
S7
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
D
brig.
26
10.39
0
39.57
0.00
3752
2B
S9
I Blanton
4.10
3.81
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
L 20
11.92
0
45.43
0.00
-

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
y
Applic.
Method
_Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
I N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
2B
S5
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
45.66
0.00
3752
2B
S7
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
319-59
0.00
3752
2B
S9
Blanton
4.10
3.81
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
363.43
0.00
3752
2C
S5
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
01
brig.
4
1.60
0
7.61
0.00
3752
2C
S7
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
26
10.39
0
49.44
0.00
3752
2C
S9
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
56.76
0.00
3752
2C
S5
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Hybrid Bermudograss Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
5T04
0.00
3752
2C
S7
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
210
83.88
0
399.28
0,00
3752
2C
S9
Blanton
5.25
4.76
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
160
95.39
0
454.05
0,00
3752
2D
S5
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
4
1,60
0
7.00
0.00
3752
2D
S7
Bojac
4.65
4,38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
45.49
0,00
3752
2D
S9
Bojac
4,65
4.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
52.23
0-00
3752
2D
S5
Bojac
4.65
4.38
1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
301
I L98
0
52.49
0.00
3752
2D
S7
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*4001
0
01
Irrig.
210
83.981
0
367,41
0.00
3752
2D
S9
Bojac
4.65
4.38
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
brig.
160
95.39
0
417.80
0.00
3752
2E
S5
Blanton
4.50
4.17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
6.66
0.00
37521
2E
S7
Blanton
4.50
4.17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
43.31
0.00
3752
2E
S9
Blanton
4.50
4,17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
49.72
0.00
3752
2E
S5
Blanton
4.50
4.17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig,
30
11.98
0
49.97
0.00
3752
2E
S7
Blanton
4,50
4.17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
349.79
0.00
3752
2E
S9
Blanton
1 4.50
4.17
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
1 160
95,39
❑
397.77
0.00
3752
2F
SS
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
D
Irrig.
4
1.60
----OF
6.26
O.DO
------------------------------- -------- --- ------ ---------- -------------...-----------------g-
---------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Page 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
aanure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
ga11A
tans
1000 gals
tons
3752
2F
S7
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
brig.
26
10,39
0
40.71
0.00
3752
2F
S9
Blanton
4.261
3,92
Small. Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
I L92
0
46.74
0.00
3752
2F
S5
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
30
11.98
0
46.97
0.00
3752
2F
S7
Blanton
4.201
3.92
1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
* .8-0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
01
328.82
0.00
3752
2F
S9
Blanton
4.20
3.92
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irri.¢.
160
95,39
0
373.92
0.00
3752
20
SS
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tonsi
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
01
7.22
0.00
3752
2G
S7
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
26
10.39
0
46.94
0.00
3752
2G
S9
Blanton
4.80
4.52
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
p
53.90
0.00
3752
2G
S5
Blanton
4,80
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/I-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
30
11.98
0
54.16
0.00
3752
2G
S7
Blanton
4,80
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig,
210
83.98
0
379.15
0.00
3752
2G
S9
Blanton
4.80
4,52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
431.16
0.00
3752
2H
S5
Uchee
LOU
0.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
01
Irrig.
4
1.60
01
1.13
0.00
3752
2H
S7
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
1039
0
7.371
0.00
3752
2H
S9
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
I 1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
8.47
0.00
3752
211
S5
Uchee
1.00
0-71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
D
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
8.51
0.00
3752
2H
S7
Uchee
1.00
0.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
D
brig.
210
83.88
0
59.56
0.00
3752
2H
S9
Uchee
I.00
0-7 1
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
67.73
0.00
3752
21
S5
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
2.32
0.00
3752
21
S7
Uchee
1.60
1,45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig-
26
10.39
0
15,06
0.00
3752
21
S9
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
17.29
0.00
3752
21
S5
Uchee
1.60
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
01
0
brig.
30
11.98
0
17,38
0,00
3752
2I
S7
I Uchee
1.60
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.8-
p
121,63
0,00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Page 4

Waste IJtiII7.ation Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres I
Crop
RYE
Applic,
I Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
I N
I Ibs/A
1000
gal/A I
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
2I
S9
Uchee
1.60
1A5
Hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
9539
0
138.31
0.00
3752
2J
S5
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1-0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
L60
0
2.46
0.00
3752
21
S7
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
15.99
0.00
3752
2J
S9
Uchee
1.75
1.541
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
501
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
01
18.36
0.00
3752
2J
S5
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
18.45
0.00
3752
2J
S7
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
129.18
0.00
3752
21
S9
Uchee
1.75
1.54
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
146.90
0.00
3752
2L
SS
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
L60
0
1.41
0.00
3752
2L
S7
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
9.14
0.00
3752
2L
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11-92
0
10.49
0.00
3752
2L
SS
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
10.55
0.00
3752
2L
S7
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9130
*4001
0
0
hTig.
210
83.88
0
73.82
0.00
3752
2L
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.88
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
brig.
160
95.39
0
83.94
0.00
3752
2N
S5
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
01
brig.
4
L60
01
0.94
0.00
3752
2N
S7
I Blanton
0.75
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
6.13
0.00
3752
2N
S9
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
20
11.92
0
7.04
0.00
3752
2N
SS
Blanton
035
0.59
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
01
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
2N
S7
Blanton
0.75
0.59
1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
2N
S9
Blanton
0.75
0.59
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
37521
3A
S5
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
brig.
4
1.60
0
6.58
0.00
3752
3A
S7
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
26
10.39
0
42.79
0.00
3752
3A
S9
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
D
0
brig.
20
11.92
0
49.13
0.00
------------------------------------ -- ----------- --- - ----- --------- ­ -----------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Pale 5

Waste Utili7.ation Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
1 Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gaUA a
tons
1000 gals
tons
3752
3A
SS
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
30
11.98
0
49.37
0.00
3752
3A
S7
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
210
83.88
0
345.60
0.00
3752
3A
S9
Blanton
4.50
4.12
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
160
95.39
0
393.00
0.00
3752
3B
SS
I Uchee
1.75
1.56
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
01
Irrig,
4
1.60
01
2.49
0.00
3752
3B
S7
I Uchee
L75
1.56
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
26
1039
0
16.20
0.00
3752
3B
S9
Uchee
1.75
1.56
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
Sol
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
18.60
0.00
3752
3B
S5
Uchec
1,75
1.56
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0
18.69
0.00
3752
3B
S7
Uchee
1.75
1.56
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
1 210
83.88
0
130,86
0.00
3752
3B
S4
Uchee
1.75
1.56
1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9130
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
9539
0
148.81
0.00
37521
3C
S5
Blanton
1.75
1.45 1
Small Grain Overseed
1-0 Tons
10/1-3/31
501
0
0
Irrig.
4
L60
0
2.32
0.00
37521
3C
57
Blanton
1.75
1.45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
1 50
0
0
Irk.
26
10.39
0
15.06
0.00
3752
3C
S9
Blanton
1.75
1.45
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
01
Irrig.
20
11.92
0
17.29
0.00
3752
3C
S5
Blanton
1,751
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass May
*8.0 Tons
3/1.9/30
*400
0
0
brig.
30
11.98
01
17.38
0.00
3752
3C
S7
Blanton
1.75
1.45
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig-
210
83.88
0
121.63
1 0.00
3752
3C
S9
Blanton
1.75
1.45
1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
311-9/30
*400
0
0
Irrig.
160
95.39
0
138.31
0.00
3752
3D
SS
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
4
1.60
0
1.15
0.00
3752
3D
. S7
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
261
10,39
0
7.48
0.00
3752
3D
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
20
11.92
0
8.59
0.00
3752
3D
S5
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
irfig.
0
0-00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
3➢
S7
Blanton
1.00
0.72
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.0 Tans
3/1-9/30
*400
0
0
brig-
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
3752
313
S9
Blanton
1.00
0.72
1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
*8.OTons
3/1-9/30
1 *400
0
0
brig-
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - ------ I ----------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Page 6

Waste i Tfili7.atinn Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
LD.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(]bslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
Ral/A
1 tons
1000 Rals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
13,386.39
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
12,963.87';
.:. .
Balance, 1000 gallons
-522.52
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
4.40
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means ]eased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
--------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------•--------------- -------- --------- -------- ------------.----------- ---------- ----------------------------- ---------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 WUT Page 7

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also Iists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
3752
IA
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
113
Blanton
0.75
0,48
3752
1C
Blanton,
0.75
0.48
3752
1D
Blanton
0.75
0,48
3752
2A
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
213
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2C
Blanton
0.75
0,48
3752
2D
Bojac
0.50
0.96
3752
2E
Blanton
0.75
0,48
3752
2F
Blanton •
0.75
0.48
3752
2G
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2H
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752 121
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752 121
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752
2L
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
2N
Blanton
0.75
0.49
3752
3A
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
3B
Uchee
0.60
0.72
3752
3C
Blanton
0.75
0.48
3752
3D
IBlantn
0.75
0.48
-----------------------------------•----------------------------------------- ---- ---- g ---...
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 IAF Page 1 of

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
59.26
118.53
177.79
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
29.63
59.26
88.89
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
55.56
111.12
166.68
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
10.46
20.91
31.37
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
5.23
10.46
15.68
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
9.90
19.60
29.41
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
76.72
153.45
230.17
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
38.36
76.72
115.08
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
71.93
143.86
215.78
------------ •----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------•---------------------------------------------------------• • ------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste StoraRe CaDacitv
Source Name
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
11/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
117
1
2
95
1
3
123
1
4
144
1
5
164
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
ISO
1
9
180
1
10
158
1
11
134
1
12
109
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ---------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 3

Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
11101
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
118
1
2
96
1
3
122
1
4
142
1
5
16I
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
157
1
11
133
1
12
108
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- - ---------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 0 1- 17-2003 Capacity Page 2 of 3

Available Waste Storage Caoacity
Source Name
I Swine Nurse La oon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
11/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
120
1
2
99
1
3
129
1
4
151
I
5
172
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
158
1
11
135
1
12
111
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-- -------------------------...------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 Capacity Page 3 of 3

Required Speciflcations For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,19959
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge„ pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
..----------------------------------------------- I ---- -------------------------- -----------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years..
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in'a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ I--------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/17/03 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): IA, 113, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2N, 3A, 3C, 3D
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced F to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb1ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Iblac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2D
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
----------------------------------------------------•---------------------------------- ------- ------------•-----------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-17-2003 CropNote Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2H, 2I, 27, 3B
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (L5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1A, 113, 1C, 113, 2A, 213, 2C, 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2N, 3A, 3C, 3D
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------------------------------------------------•--------------- _------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 0I-17-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2D
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2H, 2I, 2J, 3B
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains'at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
---------••------------------------------------------------------------ ------g--------------
425274 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01 - 17-2003 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

I

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
63.38
28076
0
0
63.38
28076
* BALANCE
-1229
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
y�Q�.0 /G� T7a,✓ 0 C✓ff5 / s c�-�.°«Jr �y �' mE yufi��i
<GicgP�,,.r r✓O Z Z cr3 /'�{ s-rT ETG Tf/,�� ��E 4' i/cV.
r�ZAS �.- TN a L.4r7i v S o res �,s�E SET 0r1J /A!'�Ly Ald 1Wc#fC 77x~
���.�vr w1��7""Ff f, G✓ N IWOIV r/,s wE7f� 1���.�n-� i r � Sef4,0E' �`xtr7'i
%Q dAEG[{ ��"�° �p��l �.¢�'ia•✓ , i t`f /rs W"f-s �J�/� 77 c E' TrfL'_
0� �N�°•�i`, K=� c f����y u,� 7-0
� err S 9 i 7 r.v� f /4� � SS y� ���V �o �f°E �� �T�.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�/f-r s e° tf�i✓ / s sc�` � P jr/ /! 5� �d d /6s / /' ,�// �v�� �� .5�.(t�';
7`/S�rS r s 7 r`r� �� � v r/'��- W�Sr"� H T /.c.rF�i-7o.d y'vi�✓ fr1'P %`t ���i
r T �i�Prrl .� L s �f�s ,�.as Ti �.=•�� c ,yx.-,.'
4" t
Td •0.�i'f7 ryE j/lFz,�
It/ f�E� D v�l �I �✓v S ✓!i/�� L (�-/(�'/�/ / ' rs /QG G U��y /►i��►�IJC�! % �I
/;�f I'll cti.+q /'c-lf�'✓r !�
r� rtry so war s� s
/�1�Y G° •� ��• ,vh /s L-5 sue":.. .
�ffi�T T �� ✓`�� ® .
/¢-GL dw .✓ iyffyc.t_ d-iJ /1i�/� 7`� SC��,O d �l i %h��
�C+h7/�/�✓!r1/l� � "7 7r/L�7✓ Tfl`L� /�G/4 L �y� Tff Gr�U/ocl.9i✓ram
!� AIC- r4'n/�J. Tftc� �J��T3�vc� �P ate✓ ; ,5�c- � ��s��s a.✓
" L � � ✓c S �Jf}-u- �i,� o uwrS d� Gci�Tr . �P�E�t'c. hr /� �S
cj f7 tr/.t/ Ti�A I 7 —/115- rJLrT�7� l4 d/ : ff c✓r77�
D M "I cif/ iGL074ir�yi( e C rYJ'
Page: 12

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT_, AND NATURAL-, RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Earl Lee
Lee Brothers Farm kfc,laN�� OFF
.
1245 Oak Forest Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 5.1-4-
4ohnston-County
Dear Earl Lee:
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRi, IRR2, DRY], DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact -Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
s
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural. Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
Earl Lee
Lee Brothers Farm
1245 Oak Forest Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Ai •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS510004
Lee Brothers Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Johnston County
Dear Earl Lee:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on April 21, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Earl Lee, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Lee Brothers Farm, located in Johnston County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 4108 Wean to Feeder, 6120 Feeder to Finish and 2000 Farrow
to Wean and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS510004 dated April 21, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition I13.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition II1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed.prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510004
Lee Brothers Farm
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the D WQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 F?WA 0
Raleigh Regional Office7a
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDE�HNFZ
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
Earl Lee
1245 Oak Forest Rd.
Four Oaks, NC 27524
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summaries and Corrective Action! Recommendations
Lee Brothers Farm Facility No. 51-4 Johnson County
Harold W. Lee and Sons Farm Facility No. 51-52 Johnson County
Dear Mr. Lee,
On July 15, Operation Reviews were conducted of Lee Brothers Farm, facility no. 51-4 and Harold
Lee and Sons Farm, facility no. 51-52. These Reviews, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D,
are one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The
Division of WateriQuality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Reviews, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. Copies of the completed review forms are
enclosed for your information. The following observances and questions were discovered and noted for
corrective action or response:
1. The vegetation around lagoon #2 on the Harold Lee and Sons Farm needs to be mowed to permit
easy visual inspection and vegetation established on the bare areas at the comer.
2. Remove dead tree limbs from the backside of lagoon #1 on the Lee and Sons Farm.
3. The built up side of lagoon #3 on the Lee Bros. Farm has uneven areas I the rainfall diversion
pathway. Please even this into a gently sloping pathway for the rainwater to follow and avoid the
possibility of excess rainfall entering the lagoon.
4. Lagoon #4 has some channels present on the sides. Please establish vegetation to avoid further
erosion.
5. Both farms are certified and permitted with the permit number being the C.O.C. number on the
letters.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Margaret C�"Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Johnson Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, � FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%4w C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700EIRMINMEMM� 50% recycled/ I Tlo post -consumer paper

y
'a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(779S FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utlUzing information on file with the
Division. Please review the tnfonmation for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
Complete as best as possible_ Do not leave any question unanswered.
�j
Application Dale: `" I �7' ? _ _
I . REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please Indicate that you have Lead rite following list of requkewnts by sung your initials in the space provided neu to ch L _µ
Atrizil� Tfirialg r.:. �
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operatio=,
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the locadoa of the animal wasta hdIl bes and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3 Two copies of the Ccrdried Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW MP). If the facility does
not have a CAWW, sae muse be completed prior to sabmilW of a general permit vplication y ��
for animal wasp; operations.
If. GENFJL4,L DWORMATTON:
I. Farm's aamc:lar BzojhW Farm �. -
2. Print Land Owner's name= Earl Lee d- 1eA art IL-
v.-C-I
Land Owne $ Minim addregs: 1245 Oait Foxest Rd
Oily; Fonr O jC ... ZIP- 27MA
Telephone Nmnber, 894,1330 _
4. County where farm is locate rohaston
5_ Farm Location (Dbecdous from nearestmajor highw4y. Pleat include 5R numbers for state :aafs_ Please include a cWy
of a county road map with the location of the farm ideas fief From thf intersection of 96 and 50 ga South on 50 for 1..4
6. Print Farm Managees name (f different ftwn Land Owner):
7_ Lessee's ! intesrator's same (if applicable; please circle which type is listed)_ i3SDA--MRCS,
FORM: AWO-G-E 2l97 Page 1 of 3

III'. OMR ATTON INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.:.U-A
2. Operation Description_ Swine Operation
Farrow to Finish
1800 - CerOcdDCOP Copacity
Is the above information cotreet? 0 yes; ED n - If no, correct below us4 the design capacity of the facility
0 Wean to Fboder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
No- of AnimaIr.
Jl--
clx a
014W
0 Non -Layer
0 Turfy
L= of Cattle No. of Animals
'"any
0 WI
0 Fatrorw to Fmish (# sow) -`A
Other Type of Livestock on the Nrmn ____No. of Animals
3. Acreage r3ewed and available for application_ -68 Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): 0
4. Number ofI.Agoon9_ ; Total Capadry: �cr- 1 53 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Vic; �r
Nwnber of Storar Ponds- ; Total Capacdy_ Cubic Feet 00
S. Is animal waste being applied on any field which bas sable chains? YES or O (please ci;ffle ana}
6. Arm subsurface dralas Mmut in Ow vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or O (please drelc one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, , (Laud Owner's name listed in question 11.2). a#test that
this applicarolon for -- j -me•e [err -e r 5 I-5i1,,e—
bus been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all tegtdned parts of tines
application are not completed and that if all rained svppot#ing hhfiatm don and attachments are not included, this application parlmge
will be returned to me as incomplete.
ignatuTe
Date
V . MANAGER'S CERTMCATION: (compl= only If diffcrcut from the Land Owner)
I. (Mana,Qet's uatoe listed in question 11.6), anest that this
applicatiAn for
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complew w the best of my knowledge. I understand thx if all rupirod pans of this
application are not completed wA that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, thls application package
will be retarmd as incomplete.
Signature
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MA ER M S,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS_
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2197 Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Wafer Quality
Nan -Discharge Permit Application Form t Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2197)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Wioodfin Place
AsbevilleE, NC 28901
[phone]
Fax (704) 2SI-6452
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Budte
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Chemkm
Polk
Clay
Ruthmfard
Graham
Swain
Haywood
TTWM4vtmia
Hermon
Yancey
IscUon
Fayemeviile Regional WQ Supervisor
Wach.ovia$nilding, Suite 714
FayetievWe, NC 28301 .
[phone]
Fax (910) 48"707
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington. NC 27999
(919) 94b-6481
Fax [phone]
BcBufmt
lanes
Barrie
Lmdir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pesaluotank
Curdtuck
Perquimans
Dace
Pitt
09M
Tyre11
Greene
wasltirtgron
Herdbrd
R7"M
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WC) Supervisor
919 North Main Smat
Mooresville, NC 281 I5
[phone]
Fax (704) 6M-6040
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3804 Bamtt sir.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chadmn
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Otanse
Franklin
Person
Ciranville
Vance
1wfax
Waage
Johumn
Warren
LM
W'dson
Wilmington Regional WQ supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive 1lxmnsian
Wilrniugm, NC 2M5-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexandra
Lincoln Bmnswick New Hanover
Baden
Richmond
CAbanus
Mecldenburg Can mt onslow
Cumbedand
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan Columbus Perrier
Harnett
Sampson
Ckeveland
5tauiy Dnpft
Hc"
scodw
Gaston
union
1vioagamery
Rears
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
535 Waughtown Suet
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 7714600
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Allegbany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Sony
Davidsm
Wamsa
Davie
Winces
Forsyth
Yad1# in
Guilford
FORM: AWO-GE V97 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources . •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p FE NF-
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 21, 1997
Earl Lee
Lee Brothers Farm
1245 Oak Forest Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510004
Lee Brothers Farm
Swine Waste Collectiori, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Earl Lee:
In accordance with your application received on March'24, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 51-4, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached).
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Lee Brothers Farm with an animal capacity of no greater than 4108 Wean to
Feeder, 6120 Feeder to Finish, and 2000 Farrow to Wean and the application to 94 acres of land. The
facility shall be located in Johnston County with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters.
The COC shall be -effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management- Plan
(CAWMP), and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring
data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production
greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number
authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed
prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.1 OC, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components:
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regE&ftg emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite..Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-oonsumer paper

Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division,
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone], if you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Mike Lewandowski at [phone] ext. 362.
q C C � Sincerely,
APR
�l "l/'1�. Preston 9waryd, Jr., P.E.
1 RMiONAL OFOC #
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office,. Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Earl Lee
Lee Brothers Farm
1245 Oak Forest Rd
Four Oaks NC 27524
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Lee Brothers Farm
Facility ID#: 51-4
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Lee;
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator, The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely, 2
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Diarc-To—r`
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, �y�C
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100k post -consumer paper

%. 14 A mri vij ,"d Copy tv s na g A�td i � r'a n a ) Jac rc S � '
.hd
.eh
.po 0
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING PAN AND TONS OF WASTE
FROM COMBINATION SWINE OPERATIONS
Operation Code: 6 Combination Swine Farm
APPLICATION METHOD: I Irrigation
Type Operation
Number
Tons Waste
PAN
Animals
per Animal
per an.
NUMBER
OF
WEAN TO FEEDER PIGS:
4108
.40
.48
NUMBER
OF
FEEDER TO FINISH HOGS:
6120
1.9
2.3
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO WEAN SOWS:
2000
6.1
5.4
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO FEEDER SOWS:
7.3
6.5
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO FINISH SOWS:
19.9
26
TOTAL NUMBER ANIMALS:
12228
TONS OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER: 1643.2 tons
FEEDER TO FINISH: 11628 tons
FARROW TO WEAN: 12200 tons ✓
FARROW TO FEEDER: 0 tons
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 tons
TOTAL WASTE: 25471.2 tons
r�
PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR: n
WEAN TO FEEDER: 1971.84 lbs::
FEEDER TO FINISH: 14076 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN: 10800 lbs
FARROW TO FEEDER: 0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 lbs
TOTAL PAN: 26847
AVERAGE TONS OF WASTE PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 2.08300621524
AVERAGE PAN PRODUCED PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 2.19553483808
SLUDGE PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR: BROADCAST
WEAN TO FEEDER: 312.208 lbs
FEEDER TO FINISH: 2264.4 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN: 1760 lbs
FARROW TO FEEDER: 0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 lbs
TOTAL SLUDGE PAN: 4336.608 lbs
AVERAGE SLUDGE PAN PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 0.354645731109

' f�rme.hJecf C'o T sboa) /gc�cJi7ion�/
P.�
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: EARL AND DENNIS LEE
Location: 1245 OAK FOREST RD.
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type operation: Existing Combination Swine Farra
Number of Animals: 12228.00 swine
(Design Capacity) l ri
STORAGE STRUCTURE: P n 0.e-r o b r c, � H c) r) T l o J 1►7 )Dan
j0
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
12228 swine x 2.08300621524 tons waste/swine/year = 25471 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
12228 swine x 2.19553483808 lbs PAN/swine/year = 26847 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3752
1
BnA
BH
8
400
0
18.5
7400
I
APR-SEP
3752 I2
3752 13
New P"'P
4699 J
�APR.SEP.
BnA
BnA
UN2 IUcC
BH 0
18 1400 1
140.5 116200
P
BH 8 0
1400
I
112.8 �5120
APR-SEP
BH
8 1400
0
1.5
1200
I
APR-SEP
I
I jEND II
TOTAL129960
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
.. Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 74.9 29960
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2
TOTAL
0 1 0
74.9 1 29960
*** BALANCE 1 -3113 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
(Tract I Field I Soil Type
3752 I 1 I BnA
3752
I (Application RatelApplic. Amount
Crop
1
BH
12 I BnA I BH I .50
(in/hr) I (inches)
*1
Page: 6

0
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3752
4699
4699
c
UN1
UN2
BnA
BnA
UcC
BH
.50 I *1
BH I .50
BH .35
*1
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Name of Farm:LEE BROTHERS
Owner/Manager agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we] also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on ---site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request_
Name of Paaility Owner: EARL AID DENNIS LSE
fPleasa print) `�' ` fj
Signature: /�r// ��y�� ate:
Name of manager (If different from owner) i
S ignature , . - Date t
Name of person preparing Plan. (Please print)Chris We Smith
AffiliationlyRcs Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency) : 806 Worth street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: r Date:
: / I l 5 ,o %� fi&i en /7e •" 7�chec/I W QsTc IAI
Aie . rT7 -S Aok�� P, � r0 pe,

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional Iand has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 13

A V
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I,
generated by
hereby agree to apply waste
in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 14

Q tuan0, d"17
xt��szLTOLS= JVMaM3MT PLAN C3RTXF=&TZOA Pax MW OR M=A=ED FE MOTS
PIOMAA retd= tb& cc=Plwtad foxes to the Divl.@ic= of tal M=M1r0=aat at
the addreea an the xvvWCsa (side of thiia fog►.
Name of farm (Please print;:
! � ,.-AKQ- 0?,7, _ .. Phone No_- - o
County- Tah.• ,,
Farm location: Latitude and Longitudem „� mod•/ 4U & (rimed) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dai=y• ate.) : w
Design capacity (rsumber of animals) s
Average size of operation` (12 month popular -far, avg. } :4 1 7..f
Average acreage needed for land application of, waste (Wires) s
�dq�Caatrafn�asa�rs�c�r�w[rassa�e�.at�es�a=r�resss�o+s:raa�cr:rseswaR�eae=��r:�a[fr�xv�v����v tsar
Technical Spec iall ,st Cartificatloa
As a technical specialist designated by the marth Carolina soil and Water
Conservation Commissian piursuaac tel 1SA NCAC GF _COOS, I Certify that the er or
expanded azixmI waste management system as installed for tha farm named
has an animal waste management plan chat meets the design, construc 3
operation and maimtenance standards e=d specificatiaas of the Divisi
viroaaQenr_al Ka=aUs sut and the 4St.-Sail Conservation Service and/or the
Carolina soil and water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.021
15A NCAC 6F _0001-.0005. The following elements and their correspondias
criteria i�au ,een verified by me or other designated technical specialints
are included in the plan as applicable: mini- separations (buffers) : liner:
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds: haste storage capacity-rade4u
quantity and amm mz of Ind for waste utilization (or use of third party) s aec
or cue, nership of proper waste application equipment: schedule for timing
applications: application rates loading rates; and the control of the disah8
of pollutants from stogyrater runoff events less severe than the 25 year, 24 b
Storm.
Nana Of TechUjaZLj 3 I t (Please 7C Iit1 a
Agfiliation; Ifl F� sr ,rr
Address (Agenayk:_906 AlodjzStrrxt% Phone No
�laa
Igo4f1a,,,
'?_00
and 1 001
Elm
ar
to
f
t e %
Sigrsat'ure: '2Date:,�--
seta�enmsy�ta�taeaaa�c�q;acaa�� aic�stttr�as��=aste��a=�s>:-�=�aaa��mttraats�=�rttra�a�waa��+ra�
Cwner/XAnftUar Agraemsnt
I (we) understand the aperation and vaintenaince procedures established in the,
approved animal waste ma.nagemant plan for the fay named above and will implement
these procedures. Z (we) )=ow that any additional expansion to the exicting
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Enviro=antal Management before the new animals are stocked_ X (we) also
understand that there =art be no discharge of aniuml waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man --made conveyance or dough
XU=Zi from a stogy event less severe tbsa the 25-yeax, 24-hour storm. The
approved plays will be filed at the fax= and at tha office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
i r p jgT10-�.
0
��aw ti
p �} Cf p U
Name of Lead ownwv (Please Print)
Signatvxe= _ .:tS+ Bate:
N=a of Hagar, if different from owner (Please print) �a11,--
signAture: - . Date:
Ngtez A change in laud -ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be sut=ityted to the Division of
EnvironmenCal Hanag4ment within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEK USE ONLY:f ACN WO
�i �

e_ +' 3ra'Rers
WASTE UTILIZATIQNJ PLAN
-2AMS . � eal
t old Pl �m
Qb
'i�
� Ale w Rw Forms
Owners name--: t✓. h+F-e. ma TnY\+S Sounty: O o LL
. j _ 4CS' d AI�C �rras'TfC�'t
Mail Address-: r, e„ �, h _
Type Of production unit-=--:
Type of waste facility-- Ak�Na_aa
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a -
giver+ storage capacity. When Vie waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent ,
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients '
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of �f
commercial fertilizer required for the crops an the fields
Where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilisation plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutriant. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize, the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of ttie crop to bQ grown and'the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crap can utilize.
Scil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greator than 5 toms per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land whert the surface iS
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in ruraff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied tc a growing crap or
not more then 30 days prior to planting. injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient Cantent for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on tha waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design or your waste management facility is based on th6'
following:
Amount of Waste Produced For Year:
! ` .Lanima. ls x tons waste/animal/yr� Iq ' tons
total waste

Amount,❑f Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
animals ` x lbs. N/animal/year
NUAII Ac - y, Available N
Applying the abave amount of waste is a big ,lob. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a. timely manner_ Your facility is designed for i$o days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs_ N Acres Lb s. N Month to
No. No. Type Per Ac. �r Used Apply
Total
Avallal7le Nitrogen
�4 Surplus Or Deficit t ,�
� k' O'L I YvLeZi"
Narrative of Operation: � 1
receive waste analysis report to obtain the ams]urlt per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared dy:
iitie date G}
Concurred in by: "
Producer Date
(Copy t❑ producer and copy to case file)
0-.�

iL,v
7 �4_4 i 4++-
'1777 %",c
1

' �� �G� '.
� � � ��

.na
.ah
.p0 0
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING PAN AND TONS OF WASTE
FROM COMBINATION SWINE OPERATIONS
Operation Cade: 6 Combination Swine Farm
APPLICATION METHOD: I irrigation
Type Operation
Number
Animals
NUMBER
OF
WEAN TO FEEDER PIGS:
4108
NUMBER
OF
FEEDER TO FINISH HOGS:
6120
NUMBER
of
FARROW TO WEAN SOWS:
2000 00
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO FEEDER. SOWS:
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO FINISH SOWS:
TOTAL NUMBER ANIMALS: 12228
TONS OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER: 1643.2 tons
FEEDER TO FINISH: 11628 tons
FARROW TO WEAN: 12200 tons
FARROW TO FEEDER: 0 tons
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 tons
TOTAL WASTE: 25471.2 tons
PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER:
1971.84 lbs
FEEDER
TO
FINISH:
14076 lbs
FARROW
TO
WEAN:
10800 lbs
FARROW
TO
FEEDER:
0 lbs
FARROW
TO
FINISH:
0 lbs
TOTAL PAN: 26847
Tans Wasta
PAN
per Animal
per an.
.40
.48
1.9
2.3
6.1
3.4
7.3
6.5
19.9
26
AVERAGE TONS OF WASTE PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 2.08300621524
AVERAGE PAN PRODUCED PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 2.19353483808
SLUDGE PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR: BROADCAST
WEAN TO FEEDER: 312.208 lbs
FEEDER TO FINISH: 2264.4 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN; 1760 lbs
FARROW To FEEDER: 0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 lbs
TOTAL SLUDGE PAN: 4336.609 lbs
AVERAGE SLUDGE PAN PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 0.354645731109

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Producer: EARL AND DENNIS LEE
Location: Aef.S- 04K dyr�.s i
FOUR OARS NC' 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing combination swine Farm
Number of Animals: 12228.00 swine
(Design capacity) I II d�y
STORAGE STRUCTURE: finae-rorG hAaoh eP.:,
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
g-aundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer regitired for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
several factors are impportant in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maxz.mize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop,can utilize.
2. soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tans per acre per yyear providing that adequate: filter
strips are establishes.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
]pm

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shoian above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply thia animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acrea a
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility in some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT of WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
12228 swine x 2.08300621524 tons waste/swine/year = 25471 tons
AMOUNT OF pLMT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
12228 swine x 2.19553483808 lbs PAN/swine/year — 26847 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
'-•
-------------------------------------------_-------_-----_ _ _-----_
]pm

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
-------------------------------------.---------_--_-----_------------
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
NOTE TYPE
CROPYlELD
LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
REST-D.
APPLIC
META -
N
TDO
I
APR•--SEP
3752 2 1,Bnh BH 8 1400116200
I APR-SEP
I
I
APR-SEP
TOTAL128720
�- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management
plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
I Pm

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------.------------------------------------------------------
TABLE Z: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not, own adequate land.
see required specification 2.)
CFIELD-&
CROP
YIVT,n
LB9—'COMM*
* BS'
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-_--
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or w
annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less
any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
EZ100P
UN ITS
PER UNIT
BE
HYBRID BERMUDAGR,ASS-HAY
TONS
5o
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
S LES AV N USED
TABLE 1 71.8 n720
TABLE 2
Jpm

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ToTAI. � 71.8 28720 -1871
CE
*** This number must be less than or equal to a in order to
fully utilize the animal waste- N produced.
Ipm

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to O in order to fully utilize
the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable
acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas
unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application
rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables_
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available waster holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irri ation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tabyes 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
App zc, oun
(inches)
3152
3752
1
13rXA
BE
3
*1
3752
Enk*
l
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
1Pm

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions_
Your fac:.11ty is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months.
In no instance should the volume of the Waste be stored in your structure
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except
in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure
that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates
to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in detarmining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
]pm

WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. if the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/ache shall,
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the waste utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to most, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on $oil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding Less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter stripe are installed where runoff leaves
the field.. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. when animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. when applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina's for guidance.)
7. Lisfuid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page. a
----------------- ---------_ _------------------- _----------

WASTE UTILTZATION PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. [paste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
head to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the followinV: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irri ation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste rom facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial raters.,
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shah. not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-af-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not he applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessaryy, to
protract the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Barns and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9
--------------------------------------------,____-....__...--------------

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------
RE UIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Is. If .animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
"closure a "closue plan which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, -pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal Waste Can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible im xkara shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to maxk the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zipc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMA, WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:LEE BROTHERS
owner/Manager-Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenarice procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEN) before
the new animals are stacked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this systeant to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event leas severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEN
upon request.
Name of Facility owner: EARL AND DENNIS LEE
(Please print) �y
Signature: Date: ��yf
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature-.
Date; - - -
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print) Chris W. Smith
Affiliation;NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5391
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: Date:
-IQ e. 4L A/4 rhe-
------_---------__..-_---------.._ ��� ..-----------------------
Page: 11

N/�
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased etc.
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
an acres of py land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(&) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
Potassium, and other trace elem"ts and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: - Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical. Representative: Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19 to
M n mwm o Ten ears on Cos
Notary
----------------------------- -------______-----------_---_--_-_ -
Page: 12

N/A
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
1, _ hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manger that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the.
Division of Environmental Management.
Third Party Receiver: Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten ears on os -s are Y ems
o ary
----- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 13

EMERGENCY ACTION FLAN
PHONE N-U-NME-RS
This plan will, be implemented in the event that wastes arom your over --anion are leaking_
overflowing, orzunaing off site. You Should not wait unti[ w'aszes r =n sue, ace waters or
Ieava vour prop=y to consider tkar you have a problem_ You should make every efforS to
e:rsurr that this does not happen- This plan should be posted in an acz=siole locution for
all employees at ncc facility. The following are some action aenss you Should take.
l _ Stoo the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. rhis may or may riot be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible probleras are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible soIudons are:
a. Add soil to burn to increase e.'evaden of dam.
b_ Pump wastes to fields at an accenzable rate.
c- Stop all flows ro the lagoon irn)nediarelr.
d- C4 apurnpinz contractor.
e. flake sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: F uTioff from waste application f ell actions include_
a_ Immediately stop waste application.-
b. Create a temmoorary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. E,valuaze and eliminate the re sons) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprin-1 e:s-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b_ Stop im-earion pump.
c. Close valves ro elsrrunate lur-Lte:' 4LSC", rCr?.
d_ Repair all Ie_ks p-ior to resmrrin; pumps.
r7: Leakage from Elfish systems. ncuses solid
a. Stop recycle puftlp.
b Slop irri�auon pump,
Make sure no siphon occurs_
Scot) Ill :lock in che. iatltiL'.:�ii_ff

6: Cgmacl the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consul tins
Engsneer- etc.) ^ t
a. Name:
b. Phone: -- _
7: Implement procedures as advised by DW Q and teciunicaJ-assismrice agencies to
rectify the damage, repnir the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep probiems with release of wastes from happening again.

7��r _-. ,ram• .. .. ....•� .. ..
J ijj•
r I loci
Yiry amft c711lN 3!0! i r 1 �` �a7Ti Fl
vivo
JimIIM
:. s• Y .p f ti• _ .. 100■ �%
I ~:
IQUR OWS..— +iw tom. ! w+ •3 � "7� / 'Is' IEMObfMLIE
;rt01'. 1.OIP .r^^/+11t4 Jam_ - - �. • ` _ JI'f'•w4 r . k � '4 .
MAL
}+ptMorlOPln .ti ; J2iV:.' .t y ♦ 1 SMidllald R _ ! , _>�
WIN
not
le171l1 a s. i 4�!! 11N•
OL.__
qp
ail _ � '+ 4 � • ; � i+��
7c7 ~ •r .1.7.E 1142 •� •I' `A. • ,;ri •'•: -+ •' ^ �R PI • 11
` � 11l� by .. �,�.; ,. ;'•, ' -- i ,.. J �� ? v�r. lean
PIS
S1fV 3iJt ~ s� !� iMi um J171 s21 !
to
t� ar ,f•�C6 I .Y. { C1�Inlan � � -: a , 1' r•gig
:., • �, -• ._ .+� i
/ IRQ! �A :�� 1!N ! GI�r°mh F„-��•11s'`. 'Ei#" aua j \ r ..
Mom
us
96
pit
I Ire
JM
TAT f
Ilax
SD
�C110p/Oe17+• Ifii ri•�,"'•'�•".�+J�' >IR '.: s• �� _ �.t .,;r.•�r' t I
11711 � N f i .►h` ,3� '� _ �+. '�'�•� Ili,1 100! ' •'
1 EIa14M •.y; .. _ ��
DEMON �L a1 i 'f'��• ,J �. ti `
11 Waad►- .a•�-.+ti i��si' 1�"x't�_� J
� P 1 � � � �'• .�I�- - 'gyp �
!
Ilo► fa• '.� lti4 �'.
lice
rJr
y ` 1

t '-f•� - ,� . t ` � _ ~;.: :: � - +' r r ! t- r�'�' nYF jar 6� ,"s + l+• - - ,'
IJ
wr•'
14
,.�1 �3Si - t 1'�� �ti_.� �y�•�L�� }�':_: � ` !�11�'f}4 l ' 1 - - - yr�t`� .:.f
,. ���'s �4 _ ''�5:��'T �:1, r:.�.a. (}��IS'� ' c,r i a,a h S� _J. •�r,( � -
-
��ti• I
�.. ir,„' r ,; r'r}�`,. J ��.. ti-�-. �r'�•T:F i � r S +.�,�-!r I.. �I.r - �
t
I �_ J i t.'^ s I �r i' *�i'• a is"�--•CAS.+�'1 � i f�L
• •.� ! .'•_ ,; C� .• r.� r � ��r 1 Fir, rf�.cr• . .
L} f' '. }�. �. �7'I�S '!'are- ,'-�� .r• � �� r l JN`i• _ � '`
7- ? r r
I

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date:
7-7-a'?l sw; „r4 ca,.,nC-N
Waste Utilization Plan; Date: 9/z, ll1
Amount of plant available nitrogen produced/used annually Ibs)
Dominant soil series: f3, pr
Crops to be grown: u. s� . P-aY C�o� ILI 4�
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= )
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1 /93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1 /97)
_-y
Type of irrigation: velin n Solid -Set Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1/96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
REQUIRED RECORDS effective 9/1/96
��„�Waste application records (IRR 1&2)
.1 5 9l Annual soil sample reports for 1999
(Cu index: ZZ - 1 07 )
(Zn index:
PERMITTED FACILITIES
General Permit & COC on site
-- weekly lagoon level records
Waste analysis - date last taken . It 117 7�8 F, 4, 0 Cnr�i r�
PAN lbs/1000 gals. for structure #1 f 3-7 1. 7 '2 - S
PAN lbs/1000 gals. for structure #2

1-1 2_j - - .A� ,�, - , , -, �- .­�;,_-, --�:. r 2,-_,.;� :'-._ -, _�Z� _-
in
- - , - -� �� �,,,_, - "I' ;, � �jt� , � A -, 1, W.� �,
��- :,�,-!rL�q; ,� .,%,_.?.. 4:., �,n,;�.� — � - - , . v I — ,�, 7-1 .. - 5 � __ --.--.---- , ift_:__zV� ,iE ` _-
/ - , - , �-�,:�,�,­�kT��I� - � - . , . . , -, . � _. - lf�u�­
-, , . , . '�' F�__ - - I - - , - . . 4�.. :�----�- -_ A