420044_PERMIT FILE_20171231

•i►
L �l ill'iillit,
el
- L

4;4-
• =,' ., fi t •� !; ' •F •q �A, I �' a
• �+ F s� � F �� i}' �y •� � i • iii�1'�'_ �� „ � `� ram• -� 't
46
e�i V.
AL
• ! t ��,'a�.�i ,� - a r �� +� Y.� fir p,
f
i r �y11► - r1
} Al
IT-
-
�aIAOU
{" -\• Raj .,, _ .
c � r�i l � `" i �' � jai �7 • ► �'` —
its
1.hj
i14
Ldw
I i-
MOF
!
rIt �.

i '° �� �,� P ry' 1 . �. • M
r E
16
�+ - ��.^ . ...
;1*'F'� ! r
Ir
wk
ff
op
} f ~ r ~
r .
1

MVC-038S.JPG (JPEG Image, 640x480 pixels) file;///S:/Pictures20©3/IRVINGMORRISCASE/MVC-038S.JPG
T a-
1 of 1 8/18/2003 11:27 AM

`-,3 \ ��\" K �-
V-�\K) o.@: "�s Nc a18'�o
vllqc\ y �.�0y-
MAY 22-
fr,
\iCE
'&Z- a.- �, C.
s

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
El CAMPI F TYPF
COUNTY HALFIFAX PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN: El AMBIENT QA X❑ STREAM EFFLUENT
REPORT TO : RRO Regional Office COMPLIANCE X❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE El INFLUENT
Other ❑ EMERGENCY VISIT m ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : BTOWELL O I
tab Number :
4W2348
Date Received:
4282004
Time Received:
1:45 PM
Received By
DS
Data Released
AR
Date Reported :
5/142004
Estimated BOD Range: Statiou Location: MORRIS WEST HOG FARM
Seed: Chlorinated: - Remarks:
Station 8 Date Begin (yy/mtn/dd) Date End (yyhmm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DR, DBM Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, I Sample Type
UPSTREAM 2009928 1100
BOD 310 m
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
X
Coliform: MY Fecal 31616 130 /100MI
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ad
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /I00m1
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /IOOmI
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 m
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue- Suspended 530 m
Volatile 535 m
fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Aridity to PH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 83 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to PH 83 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube '/100 ml
r
COMMENTS :
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chia Tri 32217 u
Chia Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. (H ) 83 pH= e.u.
Color. pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 myt
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 m
Grease, and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 m
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 u
Sulfate 945 m
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Li in ug/L
Hexavalem Chromium ug/L
Bicarbonate m
Carbonate mg/L
X
NH3 as N 610
0.06
m
X
TKN an N 625
0.31
mg/L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.64
mg/L
X
P- Total as P 665
0.02
m
PO4 as P 70507
mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m
K-Potassium
mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
ug/L
Cr-Chmmium:TouJ 1034
ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042
u
Ni-Nickel 1067
u
Pb- Lead 1051
ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092
V-Vanadium
ug/L.
Ag- Silver 1077
ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105
ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
m
Co- Cobalt 1037
u
Fe- Iron 1045
ug/L
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 u
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L.
Arsenic:Tou11002 uwt
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/L
H - Mercury 71900 u
Ba_Barlum ug/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics (VOA bomlc 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPHBT X Gasoline Range
Phytoplankton

(VISION OF/ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATERrwl�
LI AB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY Cam+ PRIORITY AMPLE TYPE
f%%F�
RIVER BASIN K �'!�n Q � � ❑AMBIENT LJ STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO" WeRO WiRO WSRO TS
AT BM ❑ COMPLIANCE _ CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier� it-ff Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
(
COLLECTOR(s): D WQ-/
STATION LOCATION: !" J O t 5 L✓ 2 5 / 1" G IC�4 E 1 7
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-2-65/40-130 100 plus
Seed Yes ❑ N
Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No LJ "EMARKS: 5 i C /� ►
C rt
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin D;te E L, y/ Time End Depth DM DB DBM
ct 5 re /►'i o n //0 a CI o u
1
BODS 310
mg/I
COD High 340
mg/1
2
3
COD dw 335
mg/I
oliform: MF Fecal 31616
/100ml
4
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504
/100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
/loom]
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673
/loom)
8
Residue: Total 500
mgA
Volatile 505
mgA
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mgA
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgA
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/i
Pheophytin a 32213 USA
Color. True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/i
Hardness, Total 900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mgA
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/i
A H L
3 as N 610 mg/l
TKN N 625 mgA
02 lus NO3 as N 630 m9A
IF Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmtum 1027 u9A
CrChromium:Total1034 ugA
Cu Copper 1042 ugA
Ni-Nickel 1067 uSA
Pb-Lead 1051 uSA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Silver 1077 ugA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ugA
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/l
Ca -Calcium 916 m8A
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -iron 1045 ugA
Fnr Lah Ilse nNi.V
Lab Number-
I
C(
Date Received: J Time:
77 Rec'd by: From: Bus -Court r-Hand D
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
t:ompostte
T S B
I bampi
C- G GNXX
Li -Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/I
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Au Temperature (C)
pH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 is
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction Meg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

t
f lr
-95
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report Water Quality
COUNTY
HAI.ffAX
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
`�
t't� AMBIENT QA
REPORT TO
RRO Regional rce
_�/ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Other
_ j'
❑ EMERGENCY VISIT ID
COLLECTOR(S) :
B TOWELL
lSAMPi F TVPF
❑ STREAM Ej 13-FL-UI7JT
LAKE INFLUENT
11 ESTUARY
2
Lab Number :
4W2349
Date Received:
4/282004
Time Received:
1:45 PM
Received By
DS
Data Released :
AR
Date Reported :
5/142004
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: MORRIS WEST HOG FARM
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station 9 Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, Sample Type
DOWNSTREAMOFPEN 20040428 1120
BOD 310 m
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335
X
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 730 /10DmI
Coliform: MFTotal 31504 /1001711
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /l0Dml
Coliform: Fecal Sump 31673 /loom]
Residue: Total 500 m
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 m
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 45 436 m911.
Acidi to pH 83 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 m
Alkalinity to H 4.5410 mg/L
TOC 680 1711911-
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube /100 ml
IKaMI-121"K38
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi w Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Phcophytin a 32213 u
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. (H) 83 PH= C.U.
Color. pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 m
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 m
Specific Cond. 95 un*uWcm2
MBAS 38260
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 m
Bomn
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
Bicarbonate m
Carbonate mg/L
X
NH3 as N 610
0.07
m
X
TKN an N 625
0.38
mg/L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.55
-WL
X
P: Total as P 665
0.18
mg/L
PO4 as P 70507
m
P: Dissolved as P 666
mg/L
K-Potassium
m
Cd- Cadmium 1027
ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034
ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042
u
Ni-Nickel 1067
ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051
U911.
Zn- Zinc 1092
ug/L
V-Vanadium
u
Ag- Silver 1077
u
AI- Aluminum 1105
ug/L.
Be- Beryllium 1012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u
Fe- Iron 1045
u
Li -Lithium 1132 u
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
Arsenic:Total1002 ug/L
Se- Selenium 1147 u
- Mercury 71900 ug/L
Ba_Barium u
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
BaseNcutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPHBTEX Gasoline, Range
Phytoplankton

�.v tp"CALOIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATERCDAB FORM (DM1)
/
COUNTY 44 t! mil`// PRIORITY AMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN ❑AMBIENT ❑I'CH
❑STREAM EFFLUENC
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MR RR WaRO WiRO WSRO TS 11 LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
AT BM ❑ COMPLIANCE
Other OF CUSTODY
Shipped by ft Bus Courier, taOther EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S)-. s ' f t7G,l e- I � ;7
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-25 -65/40- or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: //Y%i�/Z� '
Se d• Yes ❑ N Chl i t d Y ❑ No REMARKS: l��G'�%/'Q 1^7 rat'► 3re!!/ -�n
Fnr lah 11— nN1 V
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bus-Courie and De
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
rs---
C i
e o
Station #
or na e .
es
Date Begin (y/y�/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
in/n 3 f iC� F/M l%
�� ✓I�
O O 7 Z
�� ZAlJ
ff Z D
Ii
A H I.
1
BOD5 310 mgA
2
COD High 340 Inge
3
CO ow 335 mg/I
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100101
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100m1
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mgA
9
Volatile 505 mgA
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4-5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 MO
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgA
--
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 u9/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/i
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mgA
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 UWA
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mgA
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
s N 625 mg/I
NO lus NO3 as N 630 mgA
Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P'. Dissolved as P 666 mSA
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromium:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ugA
Ni-Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/l
A ilver 1077 ugA
Al -Aluminum 1105 ugA
Be -Beryllium 1012 ugA
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
CO -Cobalt 1037 USA
Fe -iron 1045 agA
Composite
T S B
Samp
G GNXX
/
Li -Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
ArseniCTotal 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organopbosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/l
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (0
PH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 1•
822" 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Mean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64 0
14

o�oF w A 7-F9o�
r
t7 Y
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Irvin Morris
231 Thelma Road
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 23780
Dear Mr. Morris:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 11, 2004
Subject: Notice of Violation
Morris\West Swine Farm
Hwy. 903
Halifax County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
On April 28, 2004, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an inspection at the
subject swine operation due to a citizen's complaint. The complaint stated that swine had direct access to a
stream and that waste material was getting into waters of the State. The inspection revealed the following:
Mr. Towell noted that a pen had been constructed all the way across a small stream and that there were 3
large hogs confined in the pen. The pen allowed for any waste material along with sediments to enter into
the small creek. Mr. Jeff Dillard of the Halifax County Health Department was on site and witnessed the
discharge occurring. Samples revealed that the upstream fecal coliform count was 130 colonies per 100
milliliter of sample and the downstream sample showed that the fecal coliform count was 750 colonies per
100 milliliter of sample. The State coliform standard is 200 colonies per 100 ml of sample.
The discharge of animal waste into waters of the State is a violation of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1, which can be subject to civil penalties of up to $ 25,000.00 per day, per violation. You should
be reminded that Mr. Towell found a very similar situation last August at you home site located on Thelma
Road in Roanoke Rapids.
The Raleigh Regional Office has been in contact with Mr. Garland Wells with the NCDA State Vets
Office. He has been to the site and has confirmed that the hogs have been moved up hill approximately 50
feet from the former location.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within ten days of your receipt. Your response will be reviewed by
the Regional Office and may be forwarded to the Director for his review. If the Director determines that an
enforcement action is warranted the Division will proceed with the appropriate action in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should call Buster Towell at [phone].
Cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek SWCD (Halifax County)
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files
Si cerely,
Kennet i Sc us , E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center NCUENR phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 One facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748
No Carolina
aturldy

May 11, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Irvin Morris
231 Thelma Road
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 23780
Subject: Notice of Violation
Morris\West Swine Farm
Hwy. 903
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Morris:
On April 28, 2004, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an inspection at the
subject swine operation due to a citizen's complaint. The complaint stated that swine had direct access to a
stream and that waste material was getting into waters of the State. The inspection revealed the following:
Mr. Towell noted that a pen had been constructed all the way across a small stream and that there were 3
large hogs confined in the pen. The pen allowed for any waste material along with sediments to enter into
the small creek. Mr. Jeff Dillard of the Halifax County Health Department was on site and witnessed the
discharge occurring. Samples revealed that the upstream fecal coliform count was 130 colonies per 100
milliliter of sample and the downstream sample showed that the fecal coliform count was 750 colonies per
100 milliliter of sample. The State coliform standard is 200 colonies per 100 ml of sample.
The discharge of animal waste into waters of the State is a violation of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1, which can be subject to civil penalties of up to $ 25,000.00 per day, per violation. You should
be reminded that Mr. Towell found a very similar situation last August at you home site located on Thelma
Road in Roanoke Rapids.
The Raleigh Regional Office has been in contact with Mr. Garland Wells with the NCDA State Vets
Office. He has been to the site and has confirmed that the hogs have been moved up hill approximately 50
feet from the former location.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within ten days of your receipt. Your response will be reviewed by
the Regional Office and may be forwarded to the Director for his review. If the Director determines that an
enforcement action is warranted the Division will proceed with the appropriate action in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek SWCD (Halifax County)
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

Mr. Irvin Morris
Page 2
The inspection indicated that animal waste was actively being discharged into waters of the
State, and that the discharge of waste from both cattle and swine occurred on an ongoing basis,
especially during rain events.
Please note that these discharges of animal waste into waters of the State are illegal and are
considered violations of North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1 which states:
No person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following activities until or
unless such person shall have applied for and received from the Commission a permit and shall
have complied with such conditions, if any as are prescribed by such permit ---------lake any
outlets to waters of the State.
You should also note that your facility was Designated as a Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operation on September 8, 1992. This Designation stated that if discharges were not permanently
eliminated within 60 days of receipt of that Designation that you would be required to aorniy for
and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ('NPDES ) Permit.
The discharge of animal waste into waters of the State are also subject to civil penalties of up to
S 10.000.00 per day, per violation. and in some cases up to S 25.000.00 per day.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within 10 days of •-our receipt. Your response should
include a summary of anv actions you have taken or plan to take in order to eliminate the
discharge of animal waste from vour facility. If you feel that these discharges were caused by
events or circumstances bevond your control you should also include them along % ith Vour
response.
Your response will be reviewed by the Raleigh Region and submitted to the Director. In the
absence of any such justification. the Director may proceed with the proper enforcement action.
if you have any questions rewarding this Notice you should contact Buster- Towell it i 91 `.)) 5 71 -
4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster. P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil & Water Conservation District ( Halifax)
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
R1�RO Files

Micnae! =. Easley, Governor
William G..Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment Natural Resources
September 8, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
hlr. Irvin Morris
231 Thelma Road
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 23780
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Irvin Morris Farm ---Facility T 42-44
Halifax Countv
Dear vIr. Morris:
Alan W. ,<Iimek, P.E. Director
Divisicn of Water Quality
On August 14, 2003, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleii7ii Regional Office conducted an
inspection at the subject facility due to a citizens complaint. The complaint stated that swine and
cattle had direct access to a stream and that waste material was getting into these .� aters. causing
t:nsanitary conditions to occur in the neighborhood. The inspection revealed the fOliowinu:
vlr. Towell noted that there were approximately 15 cows and 1 hogs kept on an open lot.
lowing stream runs througil the middle section of the property. and the cows did :;aye Direct
access to the stream. Fecal material was observed both in and around the water and there was
very little vegetation observed in close proximity to the stream to act as a buffer for -.%-aste and
sedimentation.
The 15 swine were fenced in near the top of the hill and did not have direct access to the stream.
However, a large wallow area was observed at the fence line and within 30 feet of the stream.
A dead hog that had partially eaten was lying in the wallow alongside of -a large live hog. It was
obvious that this area would run off during even the smallest amount of rainfall.
Another unburied hog was located outside of the swine enclosure in close proximity to the
stream.
Stream samples were collected from 2 locations within the feedlot area. Both indicated fecal
coliform levels above the water quality standard.
Z\
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

0.0

Report to: g 02— 0 WATER QUALITY SECTION Page —L— of
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENR/DWQ LABORATORY (check one): ( CENTRAL I I ARO I I WaRO
For Investigation of: �/Z is ��Q �. G/Z �•,
Sample collector (print name) z
and DM -I forms completed by: �3G($ �P!� T, Sample collector's signature: t=✓^/<%�L
l
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Lab Use Only
LAB NO.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
01
Z-----
u o �✓�I S�. e .� � c i= DC-
y z
2- c:
Z___
Re ' quished>y Lsignature):
,Relinquished
Date
Time
ece d by (si re): ,� l
a e
'
iLc.
by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
1
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment circle one): State Courier and -deliver Federal ExDress UPS Other:
Security Type and Conditions:
Sealed by: x Broken by:
INTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
LAB NUMBERS
THROUGH
,,ANALYSES
�REQUESTED —1
• ,
BY:
RECEIVEDFROM,'
BY:
®®
nsm,
.���.i
QA1FormslSample ReceivinglCOC form WQ Idbs
IN

Date of Visit: Time:
Facility Number C
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: V County: f
Owner Name: Phone No: 5 Z ^ 07 r 7
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 6 66 Longitude ' 6 66
Design Current
Design Current .'
Design
Current,
Swine Capacity -Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
'Poultry ;
❑ Layer
CapacitV Population- `' Cattle
❑ D '
Capacity
Population
❑ Feede .to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
on -Dairy
❑ F row to Wean
arrow to Feeder �s"
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Other
a_
Total Design Capacity
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
j
Number of�Lagoons ®
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
r "❑Subsurface
Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System '!
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field 00ther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
�esEl No
❑ Yes • No
Yes ❑ No
❑ems No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: Z — C t
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Anglication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? -
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type [/ U G r tIIDT,
13. Do the receiving crops differ those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency? es ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
l� � I �
(� l� s —
!S �,s � � re �
✓�-c�Qss � 5�ro,�.L
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
.�i
z6/072,.
M
Date:
Continued

d W
Facility Number: .L — t Date of Inspection ��
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
'Additional``Cominen'ts and/of£'Drawmgs .^,
❑ Yes ❑ No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
O5103101

r
44/20/2004 10:10 5831814 FCSWCD NRCS PAGE 01/02
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Halif= County Appullwat Center
359 Ferrell L we Room 131
Post Office Box 8 N RCS
HaIo�xNC 27839-0008
Phone: 2S2-S83-3481 Fxt. 3 1 Wayne Short
,Fax: [phone] District Conse"adonht
Email: [e-mail]
Fax Transmittal
Date:./'. .
To
Fax Number: Ll `"` 5� 7 ! `'" 4 l `
uu Dber of pages inckdiM cover sheet

REVISED
RLPLR3
�j
DIVISION OF WATER QUALI'���,�► Vf i LJ.. f
Chemistry Laboratory Report/Water Quality
a b W� SAMPLETYPE
COUNTY : A PRIORITY
RIVERBASIN: O a�ry , AMBIENT QA STREAM X� EFFLUENT
REPORTTO RRO J / COMPLIANCE X� CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT
Other : EMERGENCY VISIT ID ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTORS) : BTOWELL v
Lab Number 3W5174
Date Received: 8/14/2003
Time Received: 3:15 PM
Received By H
Data leased : R
Date Reported : 8262003
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: IRVIN MORRIS COMPLAINT
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station H Date Begin (ly/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DR, DBM Value Type - A. H, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
FRONTSTREAM 20030814 1245
X
BOD 310 6.8 G5, G6 m /L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 m L
X
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 2000 65 B6 100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 100m1
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 100m1
Colif. Fecal Step 31673 100m1
Residue: Total 500 m L
Volatile 505 m L
Fixed 510 m L
Residue: Suspended 530 m /L
Volatile535 m /L
Fixed 540 m L
H 403 units
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m L
Acidity to PH8.3435 m L
Alkalinity to PH83415 m L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC680 m /L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Calif. Total Tube 100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride940 m /L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u / L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u / L
Pheo h tin a 32213 u /L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. H 83 H- C.U.
Color. PH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m L
Fluoride 951 m L
Formaldehyde 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 m L
Hardness Total900 m L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS38260 m /L
Phenols 32730 u L
Sulfate 945 m L
Sulfide 745 m L
Boron
Tannin 6r Lignin u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u L
Bicarbonate m /L
Carbonate m L
X
NH3 as N 610
0.13
m / L
X
TKN an N 625
0.95
m / L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
1.4
mgl L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.30
m L
PO4 as P 70507
m / L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m / L
K-Potassium
m /L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
u /L
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
u L
Cu- Copper 1042
u L
Ni-Nickel1067
u /L
Pb- Lead 1051
u / L
Zn- Zinc 1092
u L
IV -Vanadium
u L
A - Silver 1077
u L
AI- Aluminum 1105
u L
Be- Beryllium 1012
u L
Ca- Calcium 916
m L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u / L
Fe- Iron 1045
u /L
Li -Lithium 1132 u /L
Mg- Maesium 927 m /L
Mn-Manganese 1055 u L
Na- Sodium 929 m /L
ArsenicTotal1002 u L
Se-Selemum1147 u L
H - Mercury 71900 u /L
Ba-Barium u L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Or ano hos horus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base NeutraI&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Ran e
Purgeable Organics(VOA bottle 'd
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH BTEX Gasoline Range
Phyto lankton

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
I317 i17 llrTfl. IRA
COUNTY .,l
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN
❑A.M1iBIENT ❑
aRO WIRO WSRO TS
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO
AT BM
Other
COMPLIANCE
❑ EMERGENCY
Shipped by: Bus Courier taff Other
COLLECTOR(S): Q_ t
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25126-6,5110-130 or 00 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No,0' Chlorinated: Yes ❑ NQZ
Station
SAMPLE TYPE
QA
❑ STREAM
CHAIN
❑ LAKE
OFDY
oillill
Y�OITUAW
i
EFFLUENT
❑ INFLUENT
ST&TION LOCATION: —7yd i /%'1 j� r/ oS C n. �q / 7 ---
REMARKS:w-
Lab Number:
Date Receiv d Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bus -Courier and D
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Beginl Date End Time EndlDepth DM DB DBM (Value Type
A H L
I t t
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/I
3
w3mg/l
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/i
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(ptl ) 83 ADMI
Color: pit 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
h1BAS 38266 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/l
Sulfide 745 mg/I
H3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
02 us NO3 as N 630 m9A
Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper1042 ug/l
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/l
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Be-Berylllum 1012 ug/1
Ca-Calchnn 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045- ugA
1posile
T S B
Sample T e
C G
GNXX —
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/i
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/I
Na-Sodium 929
mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
139/1
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophospiwrus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pit
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature IC)
pH 8.3 pt1 4.5
pit 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1•
400 1•
82244 1 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
136
1351
1350
135
64
14

/j NC DENR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
to: /C ® Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: Sample ID:
Station Location:' unty: �� - Region: 4;
Sample Type: — Priority: `rT���/ �%G' Collector:
Date collected: _/��/�_ Date received: /Z.A/te2;3 Date analyzed: _ / ':K
Affected Parameter(s): en
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑/METALS
❑ NUT 5 MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on feldsheet
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed daring extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑ Other (specify):
Corrective Xction:
❑ VOA ❑ SVOA
❑ PEST
Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑ Analyst error — no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
None added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ Internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
-❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
❑ Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
Vample(s) on hold until:
ample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes
Person Contacted:
Form
Lfad Chemist Re e)(Val):
'
BIOCHE
METALS
Branch Head Review (initi
QA/QC Review (in' al):
QA\FormsUboratorf SAR
No
Date:
Date: _Z/07&,l_&-3
❑ PEST J ❑ SVOA
❑ VOA _&
Logged into database by (initial):
1027/01dbs

to:
NC DENR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: .4W 5 i Sample ID:
Station Location: I C!�A rlI %County: pC Region: 42-P—o
Sample Type: priority: COG Collector: -fo we&
Date collected: 0 0% / Date received: O S/ 05 /I_ Date analyzed: 0
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ ETALS
❑ NUT MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
Cl Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑ Other (specify):
Comments:
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
❑ SVOA
❑ Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure - no reportable results
❑ Analyst error - no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ jnternal standards
W/Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
❑ Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Contacted:
Date
Form completed by: C O(A �� Date: 019
ad Chemist Re w i lal):
BIOCHEM ❑ PEST ❑ SVOA
❑ METALS - / O VOA
Branch Head Review (in' a .
QA/QC Review (in dal): Logged into database by (ini
QAtForms\Labomtory\SAR 027/010.

121
REVISED
REPORT
DIVISION OF WATER QUAL
G'J
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Qoal ATE: iI\ilRALS:
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
COUNTY LIFAX, PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN: v ` a �,6j AMBIENT QA STREAM X� EFFLUENT
REPORT TO RRO ��nal ice �('1 ��0 COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT
Other �^� ttll EMERGENCY VISITIDEJ ESTUARY 2
COLLECTOR(S) : B TOWELL
Lab Number
3W5175
Date Received:
8/14/2003
Time Received:
3:15 FM
Received By
U
Data eleased
1
AR O
Date Reported:
812612003
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: IRVIN MORRIS COMPLAINT
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station# Date Begin(yy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth-DM,D%DBM Value Type-A,H,L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
BACK STREAM SECTION W03W14 1 1 1310
X
BOD310 3.9 G5, G6 m L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 m L
X
Coliform: MF Fecal31616 2000 B5 B6 100m1
Colifonn: MF Total 31504 /100m1
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 100m1
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 100m1
Residue: Total500 m /L
Volatile505 m /L
Fixed 510 m /L
Residue Suspended 530 m L
Volatile 535 m L
Fixed 540 m L
403 units
Acidity to pH4.5436 m L
Acidity to PH 83 435 m L
Alkalinity to PH83415 mg L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC680 m /L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube 100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m L
CM a: Tri 32217 u L
Chl a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheo h tin a 32213 u L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color: H 83 pH= c.u.
Color. pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m L
Fluoride951 m /L
Formaldehyde 71880 m /L
Grease and Oils 556 m /L
Hardness Total900 m L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos cm2
MBAS 38260 m L
Phenols 32730 u L
Sulfate945 m L
Sulfide 745 m L
Boron
Tannin & Li in u L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
Bicarbonate m L
Carbonate m L
as N 610
0.09
m /L
an N 625
0.59
m /L
2 lus NO3 as N 630
1.4
m /L
VNH3
otal as P 665
0.13
m L
as P 70507
m /L
issolved as P 666
m L
K-Potassium
m /L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
u L
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
u L
Cu- Copper 1042
u /L
Ni-Nickel1067
u /L
Pb- Lead 1051
u / L
Zn- Zinc 1092
u / L
V-Vanadium
u L
A - Silver 1077
u L
AI- Aluminum 1105
u /L
Be Ilium 1012
u L
Ca- Calcium 916
m /L
Co - Cobalt 1037
u / L
Fe- Iron 1045
u L
Li -lit - um 1132 u L
Mg- Magnesium 927 m L
Mn-Manganese 1055 u L
Na- Sodium 929 m L
Arsenic -.Total 1002 u L
Se- Selenium 1147 u L
FIR- Mercu ry 71900 u L
Ba_Barium u L
Or anochlorine Pesticides
Or ano hos horns Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Pur eable Organics(VOA bottle 'd
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH BTEX Gasoline Range
Ph to lankton

Fnr I.s.h Ilea r1N1 V
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
20UNTY i a PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN ❑ADtBlENT ❑ STREAM EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MR RR WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM EICOMPLIANCEO CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other OF CU
Staf Shipped by: Bus Courier ,Other ❑EMERGENCY 2f P
4r00000
COLLECTOR(.S):
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5- /25-6 40 13 or 100 pi
Seed: Yes ❑ N4 Chlorinated: Yes ❑ N
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Val
1
OD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD ow 335 mg/1
4
oltform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /loom]
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 USA
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 msA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
..Lab Number:305/�
Date Received / Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bus•COUri -Hand D
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
ue Tyl,e Composite Sample TT
A It L T S B C r( G ) GNXX
N113 as N 610 mg/l
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 s NO3 as N 630 mgA
Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Cd-Cadmium 1027 u!jA
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 uSA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/l
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag-Sllver 1077 ug/1
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/l
LI-Lithium 1132 USA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/l
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/l
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/i
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosptwrus Pesticides
Acid Ilerbicldes
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point%
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C
D.O. mg/1
pit
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 8.3 pit 4.5
pti 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
u

p o r, NC DENR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Report to: ' ` f% v Sample Anomalv Report (SAR
Lab Number: R 4R_5 Sample ID: /.— $
Station Location: . `� Y ,U 1 ' y►�f � �Yt JR 'u ty: Region: 1
Sample Type: F_ 4j 4A Z-y Priority: C r� �_- Collector: J D fit) ?e'l
Date collected: 63 / o 00 06� Date received: D?/ e Oo 14� Date analyzed: 3 / b'g
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ )METALS
❑ NUT ,;Y MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldshect
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab '
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑ Other (specify):
Comments: o
C"
Corrective Action:
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
❑ SVOA
❑ Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑ Analyst error— no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ jnternal standards
Gal' Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
Cl Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ /Sample(s) on hold until:
m/ Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used: 8,6
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Contacted:
Date:
Form completed by: Date: $ / -C D A G0.3
Lead Chemist Re,�gecy
BIOCHE ❑ PEST ❑ SVOA
METALS / El VOA
Branch Head Review (initial): rV/�r/
QA/QC Review (initi7== Logged into database by (initi
QA\FomiU boratory\SAR 10/23/Oldbs

to:
NC DENR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Sample Anomalv Report (SAR)
Lab Number:, W t�s)
Station Location: / C ram'/ �iin"fy: �,���( Region: ��,E'f]
Sample Type: Priority: OW Collector:
Date collected: _/Zj�_/_&_3 Date received: /&60- Date analyzed: //'5;-1/ �
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑/METALS
El NUT 2 MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on ficldshect
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑ Other (specify):
m
U
❑ VOA ❑ SVOA
❑ PEST
/QualityControl
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑ Analyst error — no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
None added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ Internal standards
Cl Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
❑ Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Contacted:
Form
Lad Chemist Re i w ('mtial):
BIOCHE❑ PST
METALS ❑ VOA
Branch Head Review (initia
QA/QC Review (initi ):
QA\Fonns\Labomt0 rX AR
Date:
Date: _Z/�/ 8, 3
❑ SVOA
Logged into database by (initial):
10RJ/Otdbs
46"

R1 DATEM M'E
PUG-22-2003
AUG, -22' 03(FRI) 07 5 919 133 2277
a8:31 NCDA&CS.UET.DIU.
919 733 2277
W. Britt Cobb, Jr. North Carolina
Interim Commissioner
Department of Agriculture
N. David Smith
Deputy Conurrtissioner and Consumer Services
Veterinary Division
David T. Marshall, DVM
State veterinarian
Assistant Commissioner Of Animal Industry
C.F. Kirkland, DVNI
Director of Animal Heslth Progmrns/Liveatock
Jo Antra Quinn, DVK MAIM
DiMCWT of Animal Hcalth Progranw?oultry
'***FAX COVER PAGE'***
DATE SENT:F�-c,�aQ3 TIME:
G-)L3k'4--
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):
COMMENTS:
i AXEDBY:
b�
North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services
Veterinary Division, Field Forces
P. O. Box 26026
Raleigh, NC 27611
FAX NU MER: 919/733-2277
If you do not receive the correct number ofpages, please call 9191733-7601. Thank you.
Pnct Office Rnx 70)A Ralr;oh Nnrfh C A.. li., 1-741t • rn;M '7z4_'7Fn1

RY Da!EIT'IME DRUG. -?.' 03(FRi) 07�OS 9i9 733 2277
AUG-22-2003 29:31 NCDA&CS,UET.DIU.
P. 002
919 733 2277 P.02
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Veterinary Division
P.O. Box 26026, Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
GENERAL REPORT OF COMPLAINT
COUNTY: Halifax DATE: 08-19- 2003
OWNER: Irvin Morris
FACILITY NAME', Irvin Morris
ADDRESS: 231 Thelma Rd Roanoke Rapids, NC 237870.
PRONE: 252-537-7554
GPS 0 N-36, 46560/ W-077, 69833.
DESCRIPTION OF COMPLAINT: Dead disposal- There was a dead hog deterorating
partially buried next to a running sream of water that flowed from one side of his
property to the other,onto other people's property. Mr. Morris said the stream never dried
up. Part of the dead hog was not fully covered with dirt. There were a few bones from
dead hogs laying in the pasture. Mr. Morris said some wild dogs were loose in his hog
pen once and they killed a few hogs.This was a bad situation. He had 18 fat sows and
boars mixed in the hog pen. Mr. Morris had 10 cows in a pen ajoining the hog pen. These
cattle were watering from this streann,rnaking things look worst for DWQ. There were no
dead cattle in the pent. Both the hogs and cattle looked well fed and watered.
REPORTED BY: DWQ DATE: 08-15-2003
COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY: Garland T. Wells
IS3 INFORMATION REQUIRED
VMO: Dr. Kirkland DATE ASSIGNED: 08-18-2003
ACTION: Visited Mr. Morris at the location that was specified.We did an investigation
of all complaints. We found the complaints to be true. Mr. Morris was told of his
violations and was told these violations had to be rectified. We talked and Mr. Morris
said he realizes that the violation were his fault. Mr. Morris said he was in process of
selling all his hogs and cattle. He said he was old and did not have any help moving the
livestock.
Mr. Morris asked if the dead line date could be 08-25-2003. He said he promised he
would have all the cows and hogs sold and gone by the dead line date. Mr. Morris said
that he would not be trying to raise and sell any more livestock.
COMPLETE ACTION BY: 08-25-2003
REASON FOR ACTION: Regulation violation- He was a very cooperative person,
DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 08-19-2003
INVESTIGATORS: Garland T. Wells / James R. Lee
DISPOSITION: Clear pasture of bones a.nd properly bury dead carcass from dead L/S.
Sell all L/S and do not use these premises to keep or raise any L/S in the future:. Dead line
date 08-25-2003. Two pictures to accompany report, (Follow up 08-25-2003)
SIGNATURE AND DATE: Garland T Wells-08-19-2008

R1 DATE/TIME AUG.-72'03(FRI) 07:05 919 733 2277
PUG-22-2003 08:31 NCDP&CS,UET.DIU.
IF 003
919 733 2277 P.03
North Carolina Departruent of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Veterinary Division
P.O. Box 26026, Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
GENERAL REPORT OF COMPLAINT
COUNTY: Wake
DATE: August 20, 2003
OWNER, James Sidney
FACILITY NAME: NSA,
ADDRESS: 5121 Sunset Lake Rd Apex, N.C. 27502
PHONE: [phone]
DESCRIPTION OF COMPLAINT: Home slaughter and selling meat
REPORTED BY: Buster Towell DATE: August 18, 2003
COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY: Garland Wells
VMO:
ACTION.
COMPLETE ACTION BY:
IS3 INFORMATION REQUIRED
DATE ASSIGNED: 8-18-2003
REASON FOR ACTION:
DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 8-20-2003
INVESTIGATORS: Garland WellsUames Lee
DISPOSITION: Garland and I talked to Jaynes Sidney concerning home slaughter of his
animals. He told us that he killed hogs twice a year and used the meat for himself and his
children. He does have a walk in cooler for curing some of the meat. He said that he does
not sell any of the meat to the public. With thirteen children he did not have any trouble
getting rid of the meat before it was time to kill bogs again. Mr. Sidney said that he had
twenty-four hogs at the present time.
We discussed the importance of proper disposal of offal. He told us that the he saves
almost everything except the blood and hair. Garland told him anything left from the
killing operation should be properly buried and covered with three feet of dirt.
I gave him a copy of the home slaughter guidelines.
SIGNATURE AND DATE: James Lee 8-20-03
FURTHER ,ACTION REQUIRED:
SIGNATURE AND DATE:
CO-10
Revised 12/93

- Qv\�-
42-
-vc,
kyt 5-

RS DATE:'TIME AUG.-18'03(MUN) 14:14 919 733 0059 P.001
Rug 18 03 02:17p DWQ USER [phone] p.1
4
Keith Larick
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone] ext. 571
[phone] (fax)
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
To: Buster Towell
From:
Keith Larick
Fax: [phone]
Pages:
including cover sheet
Phone:
Date:
8/18/2003
Re: Irvin Morris 42-44 CC:
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment O Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
Buster:
We found the CAFO designation letter. Also attaching the Registration Form.
Keith

RX DATE/TIME : AUG. - 1 8' 03 (MON) 14 : 14 919 733 0059 P. 002
Aug 18 03 02:17p DWQ USER [phone] p.2
4W
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
DiNision of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor A. Presinn. Howard. Jr., P.E.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary September 8, 1992 Acting Die=
Regional Offices
CERTIFIED MAIL
Asheville RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7W251-6208
Fayeaevilie Mr. Irvin Morris
919/486-2541 Route 1, Box 111A
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Mooresville
704/663-1699
Subject: Designation, of Concentrated Animal
Raleigh Feeding Operation
919/571-4700 Morris Hog Operation
State Road 1400 (Thelma Road)
Washington Halifax County
919/9-6-6,481
Wilmington Dear Mr.' Morris:
919/395-3900
This letter is to notify you that the hog operation
Winston $ale-geferenced above is hereby designated a concentrated animal
919i896700'feeding operation in accordance with Title 15A, North
Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0123, and adopted Federal
Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your hog
operation was based on an inspection conducted on July 16,
1992 by Mr. Karl Shaffer and Mr. Danny Smith of the Raleigh
Regional'Office. This inspection showed that you had
established a concentrated animal feeding operation
requiring such designation based on the following facts:
1. The operation is sited over waters of the United States
which originate outside of the facility and pass over,
across, or through the facility or otherwise come into
direct contact with the animals confined in the
operation.
2. The slope and vegetation on the site show that the
likelihood and frequency of discharge of animal wastes
and sediment is high.
3. The present waste disposal system for this operation is
inadequate as this facility has no equipment for the
purpose of ultimate waste disposal without degradation of
water quality.
Pollution Prevention Pays
.... .. _ nnc�e n-i-: _L. wt /'.....C.... 041AZ 7,1.-h . 01Q-711-7n15

RX DATE/TIME AUG, -18' 03(MON) 14 14 919 733 0059 P. 003
Aug 18 03 02:18p DWQ USER [phone] p.3
Mr. Morris
Page -2-
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit is required for discharges of waste to the surface waters
of the State. However, if you can permanently eliminate the
discharge by implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your
receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
modifications to lagoons and the implementation of a final waste
disposal plan, a permit application will not be required. If
compliance has been achieved, you must notify us in writing
within sixty (60) days describing, in detail, the changes or
modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the State
is not permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days of receipt
of this notice, an NPDES permit application must be submitted
within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to
the Director, Division of Environmental Management, P.O. Box
29535, Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535. Assistance, if desired, can be
obtained by contacting Mr. Timothy L. Donnelly, Water Quality
Supervisor, 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh. NC 27609;
phone number 919-571-4700. The applications should be accompanied
by construction plans for the animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register- Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit Application- Short Form
B.
If you need financial or technical assistance with regard to
managing animal waste, you should contact your county extension
chairman, the Soil Conservation Service, or the local Soil and
Water Conservation District Office at 583-3481. The management
needs which most directly relate to your situation are best
handled through the Soil and Water Conservation District Office.
These needs include removal of the animals from the stream area
by fencing, and establishment of vegetated filter strips along
the stream channel for erosion control and filtration of sediment
and animal waste products.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an
administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your receipt of
this Notice. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. A
copy of the Petition should be filed with this office.

RX DATE/TIME AIJU. - 1 8' 03 (MON) 14 14 919 733 0059 P.004
Aug 18 03 02:18p DWQ USER [phone] p.4
Mr. Morris
Page -3-
if you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact Mr. Karl Shaffer at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Acting Director
Enclosures
CC: Mr. Arthur Mouberry- Raleigh Regional Office
Ms. Wanda Sykes - Halifax County Agricultural Extension
Service
Mr. Wayne Short- Halifax County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Rebecca Edwards- Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Steve Bennett- N.C. Division of Soil and Water
Conservation

R\ DATE/TIME AUG. —18'03(MON) 1 4 : 1 4 919 733 0059 P,005
Aug 18 03 02:18p DWQ USER [phone] p.5
AN'0 71°�
Q Dt
r
l c-
oOLLUI!0N GuNIKUL L�, MAR 1994
REGISTRATION FORM FOR Al`3IMAL �IQLO.T..CPERATICNS,� JAN 06 Ig
Department of Environment, Heal'.+ Resour�e��p�F� 9Q
Division of Env ironmen a(-D;rii8i�3ggiteht
Water Quality Section
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed.to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.021?(c) in order to be
deemed permitted by OEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: A
Mailing Address:
County:
Owners) Name:
Manager (s) Name
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as pos ible: road n es,_ direcion,
milepost, etc,)(
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management system (Number and type
of ccnfined animal (s))�
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type of animal (s)
raised)
Fear Production Began: ��r 7 ASCS Tract No.: 1
;I h
Type of waste Mana e nt System U ed:
1_cres Available for Lard Application of waste:
Owner (s) Signature (s) ,c,, ~Yi") _� � DATE: )936--j3
DATE :/::�'-3/-_g3
L4 a-uy

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 15, 1998
Irvin Morris
Irvin Morris Farm
Rt 1 Box 111-A
Roanoke Rapids NC 27870
4 0 •
IT
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: .Removal of Registration
Facility Number 42-44
Halifax County
Dear Irvin Morris:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an active animal
waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 211.0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain and implement a certified animal waste management plan and notify the Division
of Water Quality prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal
waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
_�07-
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: CR,aleigh`t_W-it-&_Qual ty_Regional_OfficeJ /
Halifax Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

r -
w
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Governor IL
ID E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howwes,, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
September 27, 1995
Mr. Irvin Morris
Route 1, Box 111-A
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 27870
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Irvin Morris Swine Facility
SR 1400 Halifax County
Dear Mr. Morris:
On September 18, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts
to determine potential problems associated with liquid waste
collection/disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. As a result, your facility was
found to be in compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to the surface waters
of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and
may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that while your operation does not meet the criteria for
certification, it has been prior Designated as a Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation and will remain so for the life of the
operation. As the owner/operator it is in your best interest to
manage your facility so that discharges to surface waters do not
occur. This will help insure that water quality is maintained and
that the above referenced civil penalties and loss of deemed
permitted status will not be warranted for this operation.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

ift
Irvin Morris
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
-;6
Judy E. arr t
or Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District (Halifax)
Steve Bennett--DSWC, RRO
RRO File Copy

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
COUNTY HALIFAX
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT a QA
Ej STREAM
X❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO RRO Regional Office
❑ COMPLIANCE Ej CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
El INFLUENT
Other
❑ EMERGENCY VISIT ID
ESTUARY
COLLECTORS) : 8TOWELL
I
a
Lab Number : 3W5175
Date Received: 8/14/2003
Time Received: 3:15 PM
Received By HMW
2616
Data AR
Date Reported: 8262003
Estimated ROD Range: Station Location: IRVIN MORRISCOMPLAINT
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station 9 Date Begin Lvy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM Valve Type - A. H, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
BACK STREAM SECTION 20030814 1310
X
BOD310 3.9 G5, G6 m L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 m L
X
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 2000 B5 B6 100m1
Coliform: MF Total 31504 100m1
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 loom]
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 100m1
Residue: Total 500 m /L
Volatile 505 m L
Fixed 510 m L
Residue: Suspended 530 m L
Volatile 535 m L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m L
Acidity to pH83435 m /L
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 m /L
Alkalinity to PH 43 410 m L
TOC680 m /L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube 100 mLs
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m L
Chl a: Tri 32217 u L
Od a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheo h tin a 32213 u L
Color. True 80 c.u.
Color. H 83 pH= C.U.
Color. PH 7.6 82 c.u.
Cyanide 720 m L
Fluoride 951 m L
Formaldehyde 71880 m /L
Grease and Oils 556 m / L
Hardness Total900 m L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos cm2
MBAS38260 m L
Phenols 32730 u L
Sulfate945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m L
Boron
Tannin k Lignin u L
Hexavalent Chromium u L
Bicarbonate m L
Carbonate m /L
-UV
FAW 28 2M i
DELI►R RALEIGH RERG%11 f;L
X
NH3 as N 610
0.09
m L
X
TKN an N 625
0.59
L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
1.4
m L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.13
m /L
PO4 as P 70507
m L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m /L
K-Potassium
m L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
u L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034
u L
Cu- Copper 1042
u L
Ni-Nickel1067
a /L
Fb- Lead 1051
u L
Zn- Zinc 1092
u L
IV -Vanadium
u L
A - Silver 1077
u L
AI- Aluminum 1105
u /L
BeBeryllium 1012
u L
Ca- Calcium 916
m L
Co - Cobalt 1037
u L
Fe- Iron 1045
u L
U-Lithium 1132 u L
Mg- Magnesium 927 m L
Mn-Manganese 1055 u L
Na- Sodium 929 m L
ArsenicTotal1002 u L
Se- Selenium 1147 u L
H - Mercury 71900 u L
Ba_Barium u L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Or ano hos horus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable, Organics(VOA bottle 'd
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH BTEX Gasoline Range
Ph to lankton

For Lab Use ONLY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1) 5
• r _Lab Number:
COUNTY PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received / Time:
RIVER BASIN h—
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRQLRj WaRO WiRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ ❑ STREAM EFFLUENT Rec'd by; From: Bus-C Hand D
AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
Other OF CU
Shipped by: Bus Courier Staf , Other ❑ EMERGENCY UAR DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(.S): z%r J
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-2 /25-6 40 13 or 100 plus ST TION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ N Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No REMARKS:
Station 9T/G �rySe
8Ac�. ,
1SODS
310
2
COD High 340
3
COD ow 335
4
oliform: MF Fecal 31616
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673
8
Residue: Total 500
9
Volatile 505
10
Fixed 510
11
Residue: Suspended 530
12
Volatile 535
13
Fixed 540
14
PH 403
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410
19
TOC 680
20
Turbidity 76
e Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End
3 ,u t/Y U1 a t
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
/100ml
/100ml
/100ml
/100ml
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/I
units
mg/1
mg/I
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
NTU
Time EndlDepth DM DB DBM I
Value Type
A H I,
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM]
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM]
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/em2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 s NO3 as N 630 mg/1
Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/I
Cr-Chromium-.Tota11034 ug/I
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/!
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag-Sllver 1077 ug/1
AI -Aluminum 1105 USABe-Beryllium
1012 us/1
m9/1 Ca -Calcium 916
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/)
Composite Sample T��e
T 5 B C c t G) GNXX
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total ]002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/t
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophospfwnts Pesticides
Add Herbicides
Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 8.3 pll 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300
400
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipltion On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction O)eg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
135
64
4
J l
U

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
COUNTY HALIFAX
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
El AMBIENT 0 QA
STREAM
Ej EFFLUENT
REPORTTO RRO Regional Office
COMPLIANCE X� CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY VISIT ID
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : BTOWELL
1
Lab Number 3W5174
Date Received : 8/14/20M
Time Received: 3:15 PM
Received By HMW
Data {leleased : R
Date Reported: 8/262003
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: IRVIN MORRIS COMPLAINT
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station M Date Begin (yy/mrddd) Date End (yy/mmldd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
FRONTSTREAM 20030914 1245
X
BOD 310 6.8 G5, G6 m L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 m L
X
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 2000 65 B6 100m1
Coliform: MF Total 31504 100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 100m1
Residue: Total 500 m L
Volatile505 m L
Fixed 510 m L
Residue: Suspended 530 m L
Volatile535 m /L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 m / L
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 m L
Alkalinity to pH8.3415 m /L
Alkalinity to pH4.5410 m /L
TOC 680 m / L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube 100 mis
I COMMENTS:
Chloride940 m /L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u L
Pheo h tin a 32213 u L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. H 8.3 H- c.u.
Color. PH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m L
Fluoride 951 m L
Formaldehyde 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 m /L
Hardness Total900 m /L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos cm2
MBAS 38260 m L
Phenols32730 a /L
Sulfate945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m L
Boron
Tannin & Li in u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
Bicarbonate m L
Carbonate m /L
D LE-�' k�9 Lff,U v E
AN 2 8 @Q
DENR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
X
NH3 asN610
0.13
m /L
X
TKN an N 625
0.95
m L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
1.4
m L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.30
m L
PO4 as P 70507
m L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m L
K-Potassium
Cd-Cadmium 1027
Cr-Chromium:Tota11034
Cu-Co 1042
Ni-Nickel1067
Pb- Lead 1051
4UU
Zn- Zinc 1092
V-Vanadium
A-Silver1077
AI- Aluminum 1105
Be- Be Ilium 1012
Ca- Calcium 916
m L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u /L
Fe- Iron 1045
u /L
U-Lithium 1132 u L
M - Magnesium 927 m L
Mn-Manganese 1055 u L
Na- Sodium 929 m L
ArsenicTotal1002 u L
Se- Selenium 1147 u L
H - Mercury 71900 u L
Ba_Barium u L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics(VOA bottle 'd
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH BTDC Gasoline Range
Ph to lankton

DIVISIC �OF/ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM;EFFLUENT
COUNTY, (mil' PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
s
RIVER BASIN ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑ STREAM
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO aR0 WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other
OF TODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier taff Other ❑EMERGENCY fUAR
COLLECTOR(S): Q
Estimated BOD STATION LOCATION:Viet I D rr Range: 0-5/5-25 40-130 or 00 plus —
Pn t ah I I.. nNt V
Lab Number:/
Date Receiv d 44 Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bus -Courier and D
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Seed: Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes N REMARKS: �/{ �SY1tSi7G-� r L.�I i'�� S7�r� /•— _
Station #J Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample T e
r9 �� f2j�i A H L T S B CGNXX
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
CO ow 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
191
TOC 680 mg/I
201
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 us/1
Color: True 80 J Pt -Co
Color.(pti ) 83 ADMI
Color: pli 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
b1BAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/l
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/1
113 as N 610 mg/l
TKN as N 625 mg/I
02 us NO3 as N 630 mg/1
: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Cd-Cadmium 1027 uqA
Cr-Chrondum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/l
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag-Sliver 1077 ug/1
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be-Berylllum 1012 ug/1
Ca-Calclum 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/1
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929
rng/I
Arsenlc:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/i
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophospiwrus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
lI Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics i
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd1
Phytoplankton
Temperature
D.O.
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water 0
mgA
pH
PH 8.3 pi1 4.5
pi 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 _ �_
400
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipltion On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Mean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

Report to: le
WATER QUALITY SECTI01
HAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECO
NC DENRIDWQ LABORATORY (check one): CENTRAL (( ARO [ [ WaRO
Page of —L
For Investigation of:
a v M prr iv
Sample collector (print name) j
and DM-1 forms completed by: ��ST-Q� /�Gr•� f�
Sample collector's signature:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Lab,Use Only;;.,,
LAB'NO. r
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
3
S" .a q
I
R uished b si ature�
Date
Times
�
ivied by i r �
Dace
of
Time �
Re inquished by (signature):
Date
Time
I Received by (signature):
I Date
Tint_
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time I Received by (signature):
I Da;c
T; -:e
I
Method of Shi ment circle one): State Courier Hand-delive
Federal Express UPS Other.
Security Type and Conditions:
Sealed by:
I Broken by:
INTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
LAB NUMBERS..
Bra MURNF,
ANALYSES
RE•
THROUGH
ItEgLTSTED
BY
BY:
l�
..�.
fo/ ®w
r ,10, J���.. ��.iru�
i .�i .
•
:r..
NMI
Mum
NMINI ,-Av.
,:. f.y,> > .,, ix-om
�e■o
.,

- 1 \RSAA\ - 117,
M
OF

FAX COVER SHEET
NORTH CAROLINA
�/ EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENR �sleigh Regional Office
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ���'yyy``` v - 1628 Mail Service Center
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1 /1�1
if J'V� Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
3 Pagest including cover sheet
TO: rn Ai2�a J FAX: qll- 733 - a:9-?;2
FROM: uS i/ DATE: ?H/v �j
SUBJECT:. ::7-2!/i 17 5 r�
MESSAGE:
4--�'--7 M n rr, S I---j
6--C�-3 cL-
If you do not receive all pages, call 919.571.4760 or fax back to 919.571.4718.

;a
it
.,. 7'. r
a
'"'"."•-^" .�,.
r -e--'- a pia �g d xa.,r°i { a yt1 $vxi?
�e ', +~7w��xf`�'$ r�+;s �' t "its 7�yc..'�"', r�,y�`1 •'. ����� � P �'�'"
'•...'x+M t,�,...p..g" ^q Y� '.#wry 1'3 Y A.W �.$.+.� .st. 'a°^ \- a.w• r �`,'$'R�•'
vim
Pry. a']A
(I
MEN

±. l
}i�.,ag
rn 6� tk,�i'���.s',A�'�°+,�,•y �@ . +yd
�E i
i! fia !
4y.. �14
{
i i �,+ '�� °a„�� � "��t�- +� w �` x�:•� � 'cam � }-`',�'+s
�,� RTC ��:.� t � "+•6` ��,a �„�I� i+ � tq� ii �� Lam'' �� ) � .� h+r qi,,�. �,� ISM �� �!�� T-4�
ph'�i tt �'n-�' '�' �`4 • "a „u r t

RD nimal Feedlot Operation Review
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
" Date oFInspect ion T��
Facility Number
Time of Inspection p' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
g pp [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: e istered (] Certified Applied for Permit Permitted ,,,,,,,,,,,,,••,..,,,.,,,,
Farm Name: ....Y....!..''x...... '.QY rS/?ilt— County:.../.......`.......Y................................................
Owner Name:✓ ✓� n M t%Yi r S
............... ............. Phone No: .............................................................................................................................................................5 ............
FacilityContact: S ......................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: l � Q til / 20� �llt /2/8 p- Jr Az.-' �- -7 `l.
................................ .............�.............I........ .....................................................................................
nsiteRepresentative............................................................................................................. Integrator:...............................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number;.........................................
Location of Farm: C, � / 5' �` �,,, ,e t�i'I-�- ,,/ to . i<s- el f✓�iti/o�
L..............
....................................................:................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................
Latitude • ' " Longitude
M
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
" Desi
'y, :Caps
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
lation « .Cattle
p: b-tal SSL'
Subsurface Drains Present JJ❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management Systemk
arm >^'. 3
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. II'discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes. No
ElYes ;""
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Continued on back

Facilit4-- qumber: qZ — y'L
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ZrNo
Structures (Lagoons Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes In �No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):.................................... .................................... .............�....................................................... ....................................
........................��N'
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures'? VV S ) / CG 7 kt/' e S
❑ Yes
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
`
12.
Do an of the structures need maintenance/improvement? rovement?
Y P
❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13..
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
W any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No.violations or. deficieneies.were-note'd during this.visit.:Yoii,441l receive no further
correspondence., al oiit this.visit.
,n--
OR0/!?4I („��a,� � � �►� � 1.n� f
O�ow
O0_5ISti 1,4z . -,� C14r-d 4'1
7/25/97

❑ eC —Animal Feedlot Operation Review
J] Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other �
" Date of Inspection
Facility Number 2. Time of Inspection p O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
egistered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit C1 Permitted 113 Not Opera Date Last Operated: ... ... Q ....................
Farm Name: t/ r i . S 1� % �:.`t- ....................... County : .. F
(honer Name: ............7(....✓....!�'.. ........ hn v Y. �.'...5.................................................... Phone No:......!................................................................ ��r ..............
FacilityContact: ......... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:..... ... /ll '- �..........LG��'`!.n...o �� 94. p,..J r Al.- �:........a' -7 ;' i 6
........................................... .................... ......................... ............................... ..........................
yxy-rl 3 S 1 11, v, ej 4A _
nsiteRepresentative.................................................................................................... Integrator:............ -...............................................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:........................................
.,ocation of Farm: `1 / d ­tz,
...................................................................................................................................................
Latitude �' �' �« Longitude �• �' �"
Design Current
Capacity :<Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of. Lagoons /Holding Ponds 'I :'�U Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Feld Area �A
El No Liquid Waste Management System ,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does -any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes El Noo
❑ Yes q40
i
❑ Yes 5K"
❑ Yes 6A_0
/11,
❑ Yes
❑rNo
❑ Yes
❑ o
❑ Yes
❑ o
❑ Yes
E� o
❑ Yes
E, No
❑ Yes
❑.N/
Continued on back

Sa�X�/��i�,S''i✓",�`•'�1'+.;�rra:.tia:aaiia�tay.'S�°"'`✓c�c:Yk:ic'ti"vis.F',.-1,i+Ci:1•�$kKuiv�%»t}��a�M4�..'���"+�<'ai"£'"�'t�'�+�m''.r`i�s1;F, '.�w
Facility Number: — S/t
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes - No
❑ Yes No
Structure .5 Structure 6
Identifier:
............................................................................................................................................. .......................
Freeboard(ft):........................................................................................................... ............................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? f/(/ V S / C. J < < e S
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type...................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes Ea No-
❑ Yes No,
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
..................................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. W .e a�additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
NO.VlolatiOns or deficiencies. were noted during this -visit. You Will receive no further
correspondence about this visit::
7/25/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Irvin Morris
Irvin Morris Farm APR — 7 1990
Rt 1 Box 111-A
Roanoke Rapids NT, 278ZgNNR RALEIGN
SUBJ
Dear Mr. Morris:
e��
[DEHNR
Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Irvin Morris Farm
Facility Number 42-44
Halifax County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you .have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N���� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

.State of North Carolina
Department of. Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B.. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Irvin Morris
Irvin Morris Farm
Rt 1 Box 111-A
Roanoke Rapids NC 27870
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Irvin Morris Farm
Facility ID#: 42-44
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Moms:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. P ston oward, Jr., P.E or
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
�*
P.O. Box 27687,CRaleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer /
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

,Y• �-is-1995 15=26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02i02
Site Requires immediate Attendor.-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF'ENVIRONN ENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 9 r1.3 - , 1995
Time: / y0 a
Faun Name/Owner. /L!/ r n An D li?-e , . S
Mailing Address: �L �/� /� 01a,
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation
Design Capacity:
Swine Poultry Cattle
7 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number. ACE DjEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 % ' �' Longitude: _' it Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient feeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No &11' Actual Freeboard: Wit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No 0"V
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crap(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from. Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? �P or No
-he animnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line -Stream? Yes M4;)
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated Within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes O iO
animal waste discharged into waters ,offtthe state by inan-made ditch, flushing. system, or other
�irrilaan-ade devices? Yes ory If Yes, Please Explain. r mm
^st y tilt facility maintain adequate waste management Tecoids (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spmay irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes 61G
Additional Comments: cSXI(L,n �r9'P.r,a�4! Gow Sti
L
�d �14 6 a,- �'ia�o /"(9 j, .9 S % di D ,0e7- �.sv�-.g,, roc v:✓� l4 � �
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Raleigh Regional Office
�JJames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Adowdimbom
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H.N F1
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
September 27, 1995
Mr. Irvin Morris
Route 1, Box 111-A
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 27870
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Irvin Morris Swine Facility
SR 1400 Halifax County
Dear Mr. Morris:
On September 18, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts
to determine potential problems associated with liquid waste
collection/disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. As a result, your facility was
found to be in compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to the surface waters
of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and
may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that while your operation does not meet the criteria for
certification, it has been prior Designated as a Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation and will remain so for the life of the
operation. As the owner/operator it is in your best interest to
manage your facility so that discharges to surface waters do not
occur. This will help insure that water quality is maintained and
that the above referenced civil penalties and loss of deemed
permitted status will not be warranted for this operation.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Irvin Morris
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District (Halifax)
Steve Bennett--DSWC, RRO
RRO File Copy

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 31, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Irvin Morris
Irvin Morris Farm
Rt 1 Box I II -A
Roanoke Rapids NC 27870
RALUGN REGIONAL OFFICE I
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and
15A NCAC 8F .0201
Irvin Morris Farm
Facility #: 42-044
Halifax County
Case #: OV 97-041
Dear Irvin Morris:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and a notice of a civil penalty assessed against
Irvin Morris in the amount of $500.00. This assessment is based upon the following facts:
Irvin Morris operates an animal operation and associated animal waste management
system in Halifax County.
As of January 1, 1997, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201
a certified operator in responsible charge is required to operate the subject animal waste
management system.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a), the owner of each animal operation having
an: animal waste management system must submit a letter to the Certification Commission,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Technical Assistance and Certification Group, which
designates an Operator in Charge with the appropriate type of certification. This letter
must be signed by the owner and the certified operator and be submitted to the
Certification Commission by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date.
In November, 1996 and April, 1997, DWQ mailed notices to all animal waste management
facilities who had not designated an operator with the DWQ.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Irvin Morris failed to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator in
responsible charge of the subject animal waste management system, in accordance with
15A NCAC 8F .0201(a).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Irvin Morris violated or
failed to act in accordance with the requirements of N:C:G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F
.0201. A civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator as
required by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.5 and 15A NCAC 8F .0500.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Irvin Morris a $500.00
civil penalty for this violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 817.0201 pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47:2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201.
Please find attached another Operator in Charge designation form. Please complete this
form and return it to:
. WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
. P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If the aforementioned operator designation form is not at the above address within 30 days
of your receipt of this notice, you will be subject to further civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each
day that.the operator in charge designation is not submitted. You may contact DWQ's Training
and Certification Group at [phone] for information about designating a certified operator.
Within thirty days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North.Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative

hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDENR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely, r
7 1,
i
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CONIMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division 'of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 19
SIGNATURE

ANIMAL 'WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
DESIGNATION FORM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT. SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: County:
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address.
City S tate Zip
Certificate T _ Social Security T
Work Phone Home Phone
Signature Date
36 •.
Mailing,. Address. City
State Zip Telephone
Signature Date
Please.Mail to:.., WPCSOCC ,.
Division of Water Quality
P. O.-Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535

1`R' IJ
'rCDA&C.S "ET. D I - _c
:. North Carolina Department or Agriculture and Consumer Services
Veterinary Division
P.O. Box 26026, Raleigh, NC 2761 1
J [phone]
GENERAL REPORT OF COMPLAINT
COUNTY: Halifax DATE: 08-19- 2003
OWNER: Irvin Morris
FACILITY NAME, Irvin Morris
ADDRESS: 231 Thelma Rd Roanoke Rapids. NC 237870.
PHONE: [phone]
GPS 0 N-36, 46560/ W-077, 69833.
DESCRIPTION OF COMPLAINNT: Dead disposal- There was a dead hog deteroratine
partially buried next to a running sream of water that flowed from one side of his
property to the other,onto other people's property. %1r. Morris said the stream never dried
up. Part of the dead hog was not fully covered with dtr,. There were a few bones rom
dears hogs laying in the pasture . Mr. 'Morris said some wild dogs were loose in his hog
pen once and they killed a few hogs.This was a bad situation. He had 18 fat sows and
boars mixed in the hog pen. Mr. Morris had 10 cows in a pen ajoming the hou per.. These
cattle were watering from this stream,making things look worst ibr DWQ. There "vere no
dead cattle in the pen. Both the hogs and cattle looked well fed and watered.
REPORTED BY: DWQ DATE: 08-15-200--
COI, PLAINT RECEIVED BY: Garland T. Wells
IS3 INFORMATION REQUIRED
VMO: Dr. Kirkland DATE ASSIGNED: 08-18-2,003
ACTION: Visited fir. Morris at the location that was specined.We did an investigation
of all complaints. We found the complaints to be true. Mr. Morris Nvas told of his
violations and A-m told these violations had to be rectified. We talked and 1vL-. Morris
said he realizes that the violation were his fault. Mr. Morris said he was in process of
selling all his hogs and cattle. He said he was old and did not have any help moving the
livestock.
Mr. Morris asked if the dead line date could be 08-25-2003. He said he pronused he
would have all the cows and hogs sold and gone by the dead line date. Mr. Morris said
that he would not be tryzng to raise and sell any more livestock.
COMPLETE ACTION BY: 08-25-2003
REASON FOR ACTION: Regulation violation- He was a very cooperative person.
DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 08-19-2003
Pv"VESTIGATORS: Garland T. Wells/ lames R. Lee
DISPOSITION: Clear pasture of bones and properly bury dead carcass from dead L.'S.
Sell all L/S and do not use these premises to keep or raise any L!S in the future. Dead 1Lne
date 08-25-2003. Two pictures to accompany report, (Follow up 08-25-2003)
SIGNATtiRE AND DATE: Garland T Wells-08-19-2008