420021_PERMIT FILE_20171231

_ji2_-� la
Type of Visit �f�Outine
cc Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
I �/ Arrival Time:
I� j I
Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
rl�r
i_ _ i 4'1L�
Owner Email:
-/, .Q ,-�
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:T 1
Certified Operator: ! 0 �4?yY ttt s
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o ='
= Longitude: = ° ❑ ' ❑
SwineCapc
` Design
sty
Current
Popes latian
Design ' Current Design Current
Poky C•ap�ac�ity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
El Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑Dai Calf
ElFeeder to Finish
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
Non -La ers❑❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkex Poults
❑ Dairy Heifer
El Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
1Number of Structures:
ElFarrow to Wean
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
FBoars
Other.
❑ Other
1-1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
ON ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
yso
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
A
❑ NE
Z. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
A
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El No El NA El NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes Ve Kol[E] A- ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
�EXJA-_
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Z No ❑ -"
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s),o S�t�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes No ❑ NAA❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes ❑ No ❑'NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No N�A.E] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ��A❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
71
Reviewer/Inspector Name j am, f,( !� Phone: IT
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection l
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes 2<o 0 NA ElNE
ElYes _J� G1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Q No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections
❑ W ather Code .
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�1 El NA
El NE
26,
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
N NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
2$. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
if yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
iti� onalCammedtsandLorDraw�n
•m. ^ c s s � , f �'� �. .�. '�F�. ���, <�,.��N .. -.aea ;'�> .'� i�..'��.���. `, k p ,. �'Y. z ���� .#�-; . e.��
✓t,G/G Yam, 2.
Page 3 of 3 12128104

°.r*:�isY' i°+''J„itp4#9N"'"a'Mrs+'4u!�vif'rh4`.,.+war+.Her,.:arsie.nh"fF{{,"gaLs'�- .r_.
r Date of Inspection
Facility Number � �
Time of Inspection pp 24 hr. (hh:min)
13 Registered C
ertified
[3 Applied for Permit U Permitted Q Not O erational [ _Date Last Operated: .................
FarmName: C. ' /s s County ....1a:r!.:. { ?5..................................................
.............................................................................................................................
OwnerName:......f ...:...........'.: �.:............................... ................ ............................ Phone No:..,......? ?...�......... ....'.....1 ....f .....,..............
.,
FacilityContact:.......:.?.. ? b........................ ............................. Title:.............. ........................................ Phone No:..............,....................................
Mailing Address:._. ................ 0 k ? / �, kv ..... F S
............................................................................................................................................... .
Onsite Representative:...... ........................................ .... r............1. .�.. S' Integrator: ....... lif/............................................................
.....
Certified Operator.............. � . n-r'--'.......................................................................... Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
........................................................................ I ...............................................................................
................................................................................................ .........................................
....
. ....................................
Latitude �'<"�" Longitude
Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area Jp Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
General
1'. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
-r b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5: Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes 01��o
❑ Yes `Vu
❑ Yes 94410"'
El Yes [ ""
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

-_--rT*'r:�'tt.,�-....-'rys1-r+�.� -T'r �¢:�.�� -- �f'sz�S'r.�— �,-rT*7fs�..^.--�i.:,F,'--"tJr•�+.,��,.—.r,,�....r'[yr�.+r--�+.��lr"tit �'
acility'Number. YZ —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagonns,liolding Ponds. -Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 ' Structure 4
r,tl* ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):.................................... ...................................................................... ....... ............................. ..................................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures. ❑ Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑,' (es No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
1.4'. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type tr!.3 n s�' ............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail'to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
W 4 ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.vio'lations_o' deficiencies'were noted -during this.visit. You:wiH receive '61iirti%er,^
: correspoddeoce aWit this: visit:. .
❑ Yes ErRo
.....................................
[IYes
❑'No//
❑ Yes
Ld'No
❑ Yes
13 "No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
Nor
❑ Yes�elNo
❑ Yes No
❑Yes [�N
El Yes No._.
,A
ly � . S
► r� c-
f : �f
.5 A n• v n ESA , i< .1 C f ��
C 14 �• 0./. � � 7Ie,,G.. y 7..41r.,/
fvu Lip-t, s .
Reviewer/Inspector Name N
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
7/25/97
HE��'
Date: 1 / z"% j' /

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
T.J. Harris
T.J. Harris Farm
1183 Simmons Creek Road
Littleton NC 27850
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC420021
T.J. Harris Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear T.J. Harris:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 27, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.J.
Harris, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC420021 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the T.J. Harris Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 140 Non -Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] / FAX: 919-71M588 / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
NorfhCarolina
Natimally

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standai'`ds a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond,, or any wetted area -of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone],
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC420021
APS Central Files

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
03-18-2009
This plan has been prepared for:
T.J. Harris Farm
Tom J. Harris
1183 Simmons Creek Road f j
Littleton, NC 27850 I
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
��
I
N
Will Mann
i I
Fishing Creek SWCD
I,
P.O. Box 8
Q i
Halifax, NC 2 7839
(252) 583-3,481 Ext.
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
ignature (owner) Date
3//
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: A3 1 � Dg
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------- - - -- ---
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED i DENR 1 DWQ
Aquifer Protection SPctjon
MAR 2 5 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S60
Beef (Brood Cow) Paved Surface Scraped Manure waste generated 549.00 tons/year by
a 90 animal Beef (Brood Cow) Paved Surface Scraped Manure operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3228
Incorporated
4458
injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity.
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
3,228
8829
-5,601
1,491.18
-942.18
Year 2
3,228
18495
-15,267
3,155.72
-2,606.72
---- --- ---- - - -- ------------ ----- . .-. ---- -- ---- ...
Note: In source , S means standard source, U means user defined source. .....
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Source Page Page I of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (U)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2249
1
9,20
9.20
N/A
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Peanuts
N/A
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2249
2
5.00
5.00
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
N/A
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2250
3
3.30
3.30
N/A
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Peanuts
NIA
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2250
4
2.50
2.50
NIA
Wedowee
Small Gi•ain Cover
N/A
Peanuts
NIA
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2250
5
15.60
15.60
N/A
Pacolet
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
N/A
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2256
2
16.80
16.80
NIA
Emporia
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Peanuts
3,700 lbs.
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2256
3
4.50
4.50
N/A JE,poia
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Peanuts
3,700 lbs.
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2256
5
10.30
10.30
NIA lEmporia
Small Grain Cover
N/A
Peanuts
3,700 lbs.
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Com, Grain
I 10 bu.
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/18/2009
PCS Page Page I of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Craps Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2256
6
3.20
3.20
NIA
Goldsboro
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
4,000 lbs.
Small Grain Cover
NIA
L2259L1
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
12.50
12.50
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2259
10
2.50
2.50
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2259
11
2.20
2.20
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2259
12
0.90
0.90
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2259 .
13.
6.30
6.30
NIA_ ...
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4'fons
2259
14
1,601
1.60
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2259 -
2
3.60
3.60
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2259
3
11.30
11.30
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
2260
19
3.20
3,20
NIA
Helena
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2260
20
0.701
0.70
NIA
Helena
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2260
21
0.90
0.90
NIA
Helena
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2260
22
1 1.60
11.60
NIA
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
5325
7
2.00
2.00
NIA
Emporia
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
3,700 lbs.
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
5325
8
0.40
0.40
N/A
Emporia
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
3,700 lbs.
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
5361
1
1,80
1.80
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
NIA
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
5361
2
10.00
10.00
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
NIA
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
5361
3
4.80
4,80
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
NIA
Small Grain Cover
NIA
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/18/2009
PCS Page Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

I
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acre
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
5361
1 4
4.601
4.60
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
N/A
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Com, Grain
108 bu.
5361
5
2.70
2.70
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
NIA
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
5361
6
0.70
0.70
NIA
Wedowee
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Peanuts
N/A
Small Grain Cover
NIA
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 154.70 154.70
,,� L) .;
r
� � ��_ s'� .1?otentrdl Leuchrng.r,,?�'_ , sr s
,�• ;d .. � _ .
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
T 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�— 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned..
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
_ -_
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391). '
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/1812009
PCS Page Page 3 of 3
NOTE. Symbol • means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to `
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year f
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A) .
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic'
Method
Manure
PA
NutricntA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
MamueA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25.
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9130
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
2.13
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
330
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3,301
3.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad"
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.41
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad:
3
0.01
0.85
0.00
2,13
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.07
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.431
0.00
6.64
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9130
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
6.64
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7.15
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page I of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm. I
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutricntA
pplied
(lbs(A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
1000
gat/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Peanuts .
,700 lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
FN
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7,15
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.92
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Peanuts
3,7001b
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0,43
0.00
1.92
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911 3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.38
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Peanuts
3,700 lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.3
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3,20
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.3
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Peanuts
4,060lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0,00
6.43
0.00
1.36
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
12.50
12,50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
OM
312.50
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.50
2.50
Fescue Pasture
4A Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0,00
25.00
0.00
62.5
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.20
2.20
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
55.00
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
22,50
2259
13
S60
Pacolet
6.30
6.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25,0
0,00
157:50
2259
14
S60
Pacolet
1.60
1.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
40.00
2259
2
S60
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0,00
25.00
0.00
90.00
2259
3
S60
Pacolet
11.30
11.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
282.50
2260
19
S60
Helena
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
130
0
0
Broad:
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
70.75
2260
20
S60
Helena
0,70
0.70
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0,00
15.48
2260
21
S60
Helena
0,90
090
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.1 1
0.00
19.90
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 2 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OWA)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Res.
([bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutricntA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mamue
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2260
22
S60
Patwlet
11.60
11.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0 1
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.0
0.00
290.00
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2,00
2,00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0 1
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.85
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Peanuts
3,700lb
411-9/30
0
0
•0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/3I
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0,00
0.85
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.17
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0,40
Peanuts
3,700lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0,40
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.17
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.7
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1,80
1.80
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9130
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
20
1 Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
- 0.77
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0 1
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Peanuts
N/A
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
1 0.00
4.25
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
2.04
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Peanuts
N/A
4/1-9130
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0,00
0.43
0.00
2.04
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.9
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9130
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.96
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2,70
2.70
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
31
0.00
0.43
0.00
1,15
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Peanuts
NIA
411-9/30
0
0
Q
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2,70
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.15
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 3 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appiic.
period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Res.
(IWA)
App]ic.
Method
Manure
PA
NuirientA
pplied
(ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.3
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Peanuts
N/A
411-9130
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
)VIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0,43
0.00
0.30
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
0.0
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0.00
u°
Balance, 1000 gallons
0.00
>
Total Applied, tons
: -3
1,491.19
Total Produced, tons
549.00
Balance, tons
-942.19
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 4 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(HWA)
Res-
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrien
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
O.0
0.00
0.00
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover'
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0,85
0.00
7.82
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
148.64.
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.85
0.00
4.25
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0,00
2.13
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6130
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
80.78
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.85
0.00
2.81
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.41
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.301
3.30
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0,001
W 16
0.001
53.32
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
O.DO
0.00
0.00
0,00
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
b.43
0.00
1.07
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Com, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
40.39
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15,60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
1 3
0.00
0.43
0,00
6.64
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
6.64
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6130
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0,00
16.16
0.00
252.04
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16,80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7.15
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16,80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7,15
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
IN
0.00
17.01
0,00
285.71
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
' 4.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0,00
1.92
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0,43
0.00
1.92
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Cum, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
17.01
0.00
76.53
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.38
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 5 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs(A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrienLA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
So>,d
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/3)
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.38
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10,30
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
17.01
0.00
175.17
2256
6
S60 IGotdsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.431
0.00
1.361
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-313)
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
13
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2115-6130
148
0
25
Broad.
123
0.00
20.92
0.00
66"9
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
12.50
12.50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
312,5
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.50
2.501
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
25-00
0.00
62.5
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.20
2.20
Fescue Pasture
44 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25-00
0.00
55.00
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
M-7/31
147
0
0
Broad,
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
22.50
2259
13
S60
Pacolct
6.30
6.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
157.5
2259
14
S60
Pacolet
1.60
1,60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
40.00
2259
2
S60
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
90.00
2259
3
S60
Pacolet
11.30
11.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
2825
2260
19
S60
Helena
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
13C
0.00
22.11
0.00
70.75
2260
20
S60
Helena
0.70
0.70
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
139
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
15.48
2260
21
S60
Helena
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
19.9
2260
22
S60
Pacolet
11.60
11,60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
290.00
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.85
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.85
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Com, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
17-01
0.00
34.01
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0,40
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.17
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Sma11 Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.17
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 6 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ED
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure I
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0,40
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad,
100
0.00
17.01
0.00
6.80
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0,77
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.431
0,00
0,77
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1,80
1,80
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15.6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
29.08
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10,00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
31
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Corti, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6130
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
161.56
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
2,04
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0,43
0.00
2,04
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6/30
120
1 0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
77.55
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
'0.43
0.00
1.96
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.96
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Com, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
20.41
0.00
93.88
5361
5'
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2,70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1,15
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0,00
0.43
0.00
1,15
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Com, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
20.41
0.00
55.10
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0,70
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.30
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.30
5361
6
1 S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Com, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6130
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
20.41
0.00
14.29
201936 Database Version 3.1 ' Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 7 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Vear 2
Tract
Field
Source
1D
$oil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Prod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(IWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid 1
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
0.00
__—
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
0,00
Total Applied, tons
s.
3,155.73
Total Produced, tons
:_
549.00
Balance, tons
2,606.73
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 8 of 8

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with,a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
ti
3. Animal 'Waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for'
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than.5 tons per acre, per year..
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by -disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift -from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
.application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
-

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively, growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a. high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from.
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer,than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings, other than
those'owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been -approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic_ rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
............. ....... .. ....... ...
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further .
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall.be managed to maintain the liquid level between_ the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste.to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 Specification PaRze 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3, 5, 7, 8
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and informatjon from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-30 lbslacre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any add itional.phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely, management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 Ibs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 19, 20, 21
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. -Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only: Do not apply N-for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU.Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina. for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 2, 22, 3
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
............
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Peanuts, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil
Peanuts are primarily grown in the coastal plain of North Carolina. Peanuts are very susceptible to
disease, therefore a great deal of planning should take place before choosing and planting a variety of
peanuts. The suggested planting date for peanuts is between April 20 and May 10. Peanuts should not be
planted until the soil temperature at a four -inch depth is 65 degrees fahrenheit. This measurement should
be recorded at noon for three consecutive days. The soil should be moist enough for rapid water
absorption by the seed and the planter should firm the seed so there is good soil -to -seed contact. Seeding
rates vary according to variety, seed quality and seed size. Many growers plant at a rate exceeding 100
pounds of seed per acre. Growers should average three to four seed per foot of row. Plant 1- 2 " deep.
Peanuts respond better to residual soil fertility than to direct fertilizer applications. If peanut fields need
fertilizer, the fertilizer should be broadcast before land preparation..Mixirig potassium during land
preparation prevents accumulation of potassium in the top 2 - 3 inches or the pegging zone of the soil.
High levels of potassium in the fruiting zone is associated with pod rot. It is critical to not over apply
potassium. Potassium competes with calcium uptake at pegging time, resulting in a high percentage of
"pops". Peanuts grow best on soils limed to a pH of 5.8 - 6.2. Large seeded peanuts require a high
calcium content in the soil surface at pegging time. Many growers apply finely ground gypsum in a 16 -
18 inch band over the row at pegging time. Gypsum rates range from 600 - 800 lbslacre when banded.
Granular gypsum sources can be broadcast at rates of 1200 - 1500 lbs/gypsumlacre. Boron is essential in
peanut production. Boron can be applied at a .5 lb/acre rate in preplant fertilizer.or can be applied
through 2 foliar applications of .25 lb/acre. The total rate of boron should not exceed .5 lb/acre. A
manganese deficiency can occur on soils with a pH greater than 6.2.-If you suspect a nutrient deficiency
collect plant tissue samples to confirm the deficiency and correct the problem. Timely management of
weeds, insects and disease are essential for.peanut production. Production and variety information can be . ..
obtained. through private company and University publications.
----------------------.---------------------------------..--------- ----------------- ------ —------------------------ --........................... .-- ......
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3, 5, 7, 8
Peanuts, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil
Peanuts are primarily grown in the coastal plain of North Carolina. Peanuts are very susceptible to
disease, therefore a great deal of planning should take place before choosing and planting a variety of
peanuts. The suggested planting date for peanuts is between Apri120 and May 10. Peanuts should not be
planted until the soil temperature at a four -inch depth is 65 degrees fahrenheit. This measurement should
be recorded at noon for three consecutive days. The soil should be moist enough for rapid water
absorption by the seed and the planter should firm the seed so there is good soil -to -seed contact. Seeding
rates vary according to variety, seed quality and seed size. Many growers plant at a rate exceeding 100
pounds of seed per acre. Growers should average three to four seed per foot of row. Plant 1- 2 " deep.
Peanuts respond better to residual soil fertility than to direct fertilizer applications. If peanut fields need
fertilizer, the fertilizer should be broadcast before land preparation. Mixing potassium during land
preparation prevents accumulation of potassium in the top 2 - 3 inches or the pegging zone of the soil.
High levels of potassium in the fruiting zone is associated with pod rot. It is critical to not over apply
potassium. Potassium competes with calcium uptake at pegging time, resulting in a high percentage of
"pops". Peanuts grow best on soils limed to a pH of 5.8 - 6.2. Large seeded peanuts require a high
calcium content in the soil surface at pegging time. Many growers apply finely ground gypsum in a 16 -
18 inch band.over the row at pegging time. Gypsum rates range from 600 - 800 Ibs/acre when banded.
Granular gypsum sources can be broadcast at rates of 1200 - 1500 Ibs/gypsum/acre. Boron is essential in
peanut production. Boron can be applied at a .5 lb/acre rate in preplant fertilizer or can be applied
through 2 foliar applications of .25 lb/acre. The total rate of boron should not exceed .5 lb/acre. A
manganese deficiency can occur on soils with a pH greater than 6.2. Ifyou,suspect a nutrient deficiency
collect plant tissue samples to confirm the deficiency and correct the problem. Timely management of
weeds, -insects -and disease are essential. for peanut production: Production, and. variety information -can be......
obtained through privatecompany and University publications.
The following crop note applies to field(s): I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Peanuts
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Small Grain Cover Crop
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3, 5, 7, 8
Small Grain Cover Crop
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Small Grain Cover Crop
. .. ........................ ...
201936 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 4

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan far this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake. '
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period .
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(IWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
_
N
N -
N
N
IOOO
gal/A
Tons
I000 gals
tons
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3t31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
1
S60 •
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
2.13
2250 i
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
1 3
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.0
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Peanuts
N/A
4/1-9130
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.41
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.85
0-00
2.13
2250
4
1 S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0-00
0.00
0.00
0-00
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1-07
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0-43
0.001
6.64
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Peanuts
N/A
411-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
6.64
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7.15
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page I of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE'
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert,
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)!PA
Applic.
Method
Manure
NutricnTA
pplied
(IbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Peanuts
3,700lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7.15
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.92
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Peanuts
3,700lb
4/1-9/30
4
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2256
3
S60
Emporia
-4.50
4.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.92
2256 .
5
S60
Emporia
10,30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4,38
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Peanuts
3,700 lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
*0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.38
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.36
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Peanuts
4,000 lb
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
C
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.36
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
12.50
12,50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0,00
312.50
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.50
2,50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1.7/31
147
0
D
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0,00
62.50
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.20
2.20
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
55.00
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture •
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25,00
0.00
22.50
2259
13
S60
Pacolet
6.30
6.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
157.50
2259
14
S60
Pacolet
1.60
1.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
40.00
2259
2
S60
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad,
147
0.00
25.06
0,00
90.00
2259
3
S60
Pacolet
11.30
11.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-731
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
282.50
2260
19
S60
Helena
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
70.75
2260
20
S60
Helena
0.70
0,70
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
15.48
226D
21
S60
Helena
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
130
D
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
19.901
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 2 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs1A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
1
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2260
22
S60
Pacolet
11.60
11.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
290.00
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0,00
0.85
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Peanuts
3,700 lb
411-9130
0
0
•0
Broad.
A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0,00
0.43
0.00
0,85
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0,17
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Peanuts
3,700lb
411=9130
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.17
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.431
0.00
0.77
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.86
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad,
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
I
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.77
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
.10.00
10.00
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
OM
0.43
0.00
2,04
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Peanuts
NIA
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
OA3
0.00
2.04
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.9
5361
4
1 S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Peanuts
N/A
4/1-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.96
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.15
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Peanuts
N/A
411-9/30
0
0
0
Broad.
il0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
. 2.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911 3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
D.43
0.00
1.15
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 3 of 8

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fen.
(IWA)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbslA)
(lbs1A)
(Ibs1A)
Source
Total
Use.
-
Applic.
Applic-
ID00
Tract
Field
@
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period,
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
1 0
Broad.
1 3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.3
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Peanuts
NIA
411-9;30
0
0
0
Broad.
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.3
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
0.00
a.
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0.00
4
Balance, 1000 gallons
0.0=
Total Applied, tons
ISM1,491.19
Total Produced, tons
549.00
Balance, Ions
mm v
942.1
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned_ 2_ Symbol • means user entered data
Preview Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 3/18/2009
W UT Page Page 4 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
-
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res-
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
2249
1
S60
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.85
0.00
7.82
2249
1
S60 I
Wedowee
9.20
9.20
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
148.64
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.85
O.OU
4.25
2249
2
860
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
2.13
2249
2
S60
Wedowee
5.00
5.00
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
80.78
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
OM
0.85
0.00
2.81
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.41
2250
3
S60
Wedowee
3.30
3.30
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6/30
120
0
25
Broad"
95
0.00
16.16
OM
53.32
2256
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.07
2250
4
S60
Wedowee
2.50
2.50
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6130
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
40.39
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
6.64
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-361
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0"43
0.00
6.64
2250
5
S60
Pacolet
15.60
15.60
Corn, Grain
108 bu"
2/15-6/30
120
0
25
Broad.
95
0.00
1& 16
0.00
252.04
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
7.15
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16,90
16.80
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0,00
0.43
0.00
7.15
2256
2
S60
Emporia
16.80
16.80
Com, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0,00
17,01
0.00
285.71
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4,50
4.50
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.92
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4,50
4.50
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9I1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.92
2256
3
S60
Emporia
4.50
4.50
Com, Grain
110 bu.
2115-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
1701
0.00
76.53
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.1.
3
0.00
OAT
0.00
4,38
Preview Database Version 3.I Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 5 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Suit Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
-
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period .
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Peq'd
(lbs/A)
Comm. _
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0,00
0,43
0.00
4.38
2256
5
S60
Emporia
10.30
10.30
Com, Grain
1 10 bu.
2115-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
17.01
0.00
175.17
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.36
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0,00
0.43
0.00
1.36
2256
6
S60
Goldsboro
3.20
3.20
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2115-6130
148
0
25
Broad.
123
0.00
20.92
0.00
66.9
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
12.50
12.50
Fescue Pastui&e
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
'147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
312.50
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.50
2.50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25,00
0.00
62.50
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.20
2.20
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad,
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
55.00
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.90
0,90
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
OAO
25.00
0.00
22.50
2259
13
S60
Pacolet
6.30
6.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0,00
25,00
0.00
157.5
2259
14
S60
Pacolet
1.60
1.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
40.0
2259
2
S60
Pacolet
3.601
3.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0,00
90.00
2259
3
S60
Pacolet
11,30
11.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
282.50
2260
19
S60
Helena
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
70,75
2260
20
S60
Helena
0.70
0.70
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
15.48
2260
21
S60
Helena
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
22.11
0.00
19.90
2260
22
S60
Pacolet
11.60
11.60
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
25.00
0.00
290.00
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.85
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.85
5325
7
S60
Emporia
2.00
2.00
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
125
0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
17.01
0.00
34.01
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.17
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
1
Small Grain Cover
NIA
I
9/1-3/31
I-F
25
0
0
Broad.
F3
0.00
0.43
0,00
0.17
Preview Database Version 3.F Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 6 of 8

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
-
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
(lb"YA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N '
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5325
8
S60
Emporia
0.40
0.40
Corn, Grain
HOW. W.
2115-6/30
125
'0
25
Broad.
100
0.00
17.01
0.00
6.8
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31'
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.7
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.77
5361
1
S60
Wedowee
1.80
1.80
Com, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6130
120
0
25
Broad,
95
0.00
16.16
0,00
29,08
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
4.25
5361
2
S60
Wedowee
10.00
10.00
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2115-6130
120
0
25
Broad,
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
161.56
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.04
2.04
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
2.04
5361
3
S60
Wedowee
4.80
4.80
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
16.16
0.00
77.55
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
L60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.9
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Cover
N/A
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad,
3
0.00
0.43
0,00
1.96
5361
4
S60
Wedowee
4.60
4.60
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad,
120
0.00
20.41
0.00
93.88
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.15
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.15
5361
5
S60
Wedowee
2.70
2.70
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
20.41
0.00
55.10
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3/31
25
0
20
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.30
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
'25
0
0
Broad.
3
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.30
5361
6
S60
Wedowee
0.70
0.70
Corn, Grain
108 bu.
2/15-6130
120
0
TFIImd._
120
0.00
20.41
0001
14.29
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WILT Page Page 7 of 8

Waste Utilization fable
Year 2
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Rc4d
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(16s/A)
(lbs1A)
Source
Total
Use.
-
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
0.00
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0,0
Balance, 1000 gallons
0.00
Total Applied, tons
3,155.73
Total Produced, tons
549.0
Balance, tons
'
-2,606.73
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
4
2. Symbol * means user entered data
;' Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 8 of 8

Halifax FSA
Acres I Crop IEE
1 12.45 Y
2 3.50 N
3 11.26 Y
9 2.37 Y
5 3.01 Y
6 6.17 Y
7 1.68 Y
8 1.071 Y
9 7.08 Y
53 Y
AL
0.98 Y
"+ ! 13 6.28 Y
i
- 14 L 66 Y
dn
If
� n
10 IS
j_ 16 `...
�4
SP
IF�,14
-1,12
`a
Total Cropland Acres
112.6

t,
••
a
�
,
.rl t �' .. � f,<x .a
',1
�
x •
'-
"fir ^
r �
�,..
"
��,'-a.'' _ �,," r :'M`a. i ,."'*'" -ws
} -
1
ram'
'._ ', _r
•
1
®��11•J
I

Wl

Far
lr
SOO
�a"�. :",ram •� r'i- - ••.•( a
+ rel
r
if a
to
•-'-2r
a

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
T.J. Harris
T.J. Harris Farm
1183 Simmons Creek Road
Littleton NC 27850
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC420021
T.J. Harris Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear T.J. Harris:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 27, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
. Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.J.
Harris, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC420021 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the_T.J. Harris Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 140 Non -Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
• documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. t"Ay
ATEENWR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.Wndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between wate supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
I
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after thle expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior toIexpiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below !for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final anId binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 5714700. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 54q.
Sincerely,
i
I
�R
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water- Conservation District
Permit File AWC420021
NDPU Files

0
•
•
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
T.J. Harris Farm
Tom J Harris
1183 Simmons Creek Road
Littleton, NC 27850
[phone]
12-20-2000
This plan has been developed by:
Will Mann
Fishing Creek SWCD
P.O. Pox 8
Halifax, NC 27839
[phone] Ext.
eveloper Signatufe
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
�i ?0le�
Wgnature (owner) D de
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation. Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: `�
Technical Specialist Signature Date
----- ------ ------------------ ------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 Cover Page 1

0
0
Nutrients applied in'accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s): '
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S60
Beef (Brood Cow) Paved Surface Scraped Manure waste generated 854.00
tons/year by a 140 animal Beef (Brood Cow) Paved Surface Scraped
Manure operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5022
Incorporated
6935
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Actual PAN.Applied
Year 1 9099
Year 2 9099
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
--- - ---------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 Source Page 1

•
•
C
.:F
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated 'quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table.included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning
period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal
waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
t ID.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
1 Acres
1 Crop
RYE
RYE
1 Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
1
Res.
(lbs/A)
I N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
I N
N
lbs/A
1000
I gal/A
tons
I 1004 als
tons
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
10.9
10.9
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad,
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
135.6
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
10.9
10.9
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7I31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
135.6
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.3
2.3
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
28.3
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.3
2.3
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/3l
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
28.3
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.2
2.2
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.01
12.5
0.0
28.0
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.2
2.2
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7131
74
4
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
28.0
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.9
0.9
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
10.8
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.9
0.9
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
10.8
2259
13
S60
Pacolet
6.7
6 77
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1 7I31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
84A
--------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -----------------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 W[UT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table Year I
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
1
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
7WA
tons
1000 Rals
tons
2259
13
S60
Pacolet
6.7
6.7
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.01
12.5
0.0
84.1
2259
14
S60
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
20.6
2259
14
S60
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
escue Pasture
4.4
Tans
811-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
20.6
2259
2
S60
Pacolet
2.6
2.6
escue Pasture
4.4
Tans
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
32.5
2259
2
S60
Pacolet
-2.6
2.6
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
32.5
22591
3
S60
I Pacolet
9.0
9.0
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
112.0
2259
3
S60
Pacolet
9.0
9.0
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
112.0
2259
4
S60
Pacolet
2.4
2.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tans
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
29.8
2259
4
S60
Pacolet
2.4
2.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
29.8
2259
5
S60
Pacolet
3.1
3.1
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0-0
39.0
2259
5
S60
Pacolet
3.1
3.1
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
39.0
22591
6
S60
1 Pacolet
5.8
5.8
IFescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
73.1
2259
6
S60
Pacolet
5.8
5.8
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
73.1
2259
7
S60
Pacolet
1.2
1.2
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
15.3
2259
7
S60
Pacolet
1.2
1.2
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12,5
0-0
15.3
2259
8
S60
Pacolet
0.9
0.9
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
Q
0
Broad.
741.
0.0
115
0-0
11.3
2259
8
S60
Pacolet
0.9
0.9
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12,5
0-0
11.3
22591
9
S60
1 Pacolet
7.0
7-0
Vescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
87.8
2259
9
S60
Pacolet
7.0
7.0
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
87.8
5301
15
S60
Pacolet
1.1
1,1
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
13.6
5301
15
S60
Pacolet
1.1
1.1
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
13.6
5301
16
S60
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
rescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
1 74
01
0
Broad.
1 74
0.0
12.5
0.0
20.4
5301
16
S60
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
20.4
53011
171
S60
1 Pacolet
1.1
1.1
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
14.0
5301
17
S60
Pacolet
1.1
1.1
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
14.0
5301
1$
S60
Pacolet
1.4
1.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7131
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0-0
17.$
------------------------------------------------------ I --------------------- -------------- ------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------- --- ------------------------------- ..... ----------------------------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 . WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table Year I
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
CTOE
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 Rals.
tons
53011
181
S60
Pacolet
1 1.41
1.4
IFescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
1 Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
17.8
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 0 Eons
0
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0
Balance. 1000 eaflons
0
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons
1,548
Total Produced, tons
854
Balance, tons
1
-694
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol •- means leased, otherwise, owned.
------------ ----- ---- ---- -- --------------------------------------------
513490 Database Version 1.06
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
-------------------------------------
Date Printed: 12-20-2000

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
I
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
/
Res.
(lbs1A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 Pals
tons
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
10.9
10.4
Pescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
135.6
2259
1
S60
Pacolet
10.9
10.9
Pescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12,5
0.0
135.6
2259
101
S60
Pacolet
2.3
2.3
kescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
1 74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
28.3
2259
10
S60
Pacolet
2.3
2.3
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad,
74
0.0
12,5
0.0
28.3
2259
11
S601
Pacolet
2.2
2.2
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad,
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
28.0
2259
11
S60
Pacolet
2.21
2.2
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad,
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
28.0
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.91
0.9
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
10.8
2259
12
S60
Pacolet
0.91
0-9
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
10.8
2259
131
S60
Pacolet
6.7
6.7
Fescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
1 74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
84.1
2259
131
S60
Pacolet
6.7
6-7
Pescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
Broad.
741
0.0
12.51
0.0
84.1
2259
141
S601
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
Pescue Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
20.6
2259
141
S601
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
Pescue Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
20.6
2259
21
S601
Pacolet
2.6
2.6
escuc Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
32.5
2259
21
S601
Pacolet
2.6
2.6
escue Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7131
74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
_ 0.0
32.5
2259
31
S601
Pacolet
9.0
9.0
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7131
j 74
0
0
Broad.
1 74
0.01
12.5
0.0
1110
2259
31
S60
I Pacolet
9.0
9.0
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
112.0
2259
41
S601
Pacolet
2.4
2.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
29.8
2259
41
S601
Pacolet
2.41
2.4
Fescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
29.8
2259
5
S601
Pacolet
3.11
3.1
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
39.0
2259
5
S60
Pacolet
3.1
3.1
jFescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
01
0
Broad,
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
39.0
2259
6
S60
Pacolet
5.8
5.8
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
1 74
01
0
Broad,
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
73.1
2259
6
S60
Pacolet
5.8
5.8
kescue Pasture
4A
Tons
811-7/31
1 74
01
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
73.1
2259
7
S60
Pacolet
L2
1.2
kescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
15.3
2259
7
S60
Pacolet
L2
1.2
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
15.3
2259
8
S60
Pacolet
0.9
0.9
escue Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
741
0.0
12.5
0.0
11.3
2259
8
$60
Pacolet
0.9
0.9
7escue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
11.3
2259
9
S60
Pacolet
7.0
7.0
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
87-8
2259
9
S60
Pacolet
7.0
7.0
escue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
87.8
5301
15
S60
Pacolet
1.11
1.1
Fescue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31.
1 74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.51
0.0
13.6
5301
151
S60
I Pacolet
1.1
1.1
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7131
74
0
0
1 Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.01
13.6
5301
161
S60
Pacolet
1.6
1-6
Vescue Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
1 Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.01
20.4
5301
16
S60
Pacolet
1.6
1.6
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
2t4
--------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12720-2000 WUT Page 4

� s •
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
I Acres
crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm"
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
rN
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
5301
171
S601
Pacolet
1.11
1,1
Vescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
14,0
5301
S60
Pacolet
1.1
1.1
escue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
14.0
5301
JI
S60
Pacolet
1.4
1.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.0
12.5
0.0
ITS
5301
S601
Pacolet
1.41
1.4
Pescue Pasture
4.4
1 Tons
8/1-7/3 [
1 74
01
0
Broad.
741
0.01
12.5
0.0
17"8
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
0
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0
Balance, 1000 gallons
0
Manure Solids
Total A lied, tons
1,548
Total Produced, tons
854
Balance, tons
1
-694
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol —means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol' !Weans user entered data.
------------------------------------------------------ -------- ----------- -"----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -" - -----------------------------------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 WUT Page 5

. Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
0 data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restriefthe rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for'guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied 'at rates 'not. to exceed the soil infiltration
------------------------------------- - -----------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 Specification Page 1

rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
imethod which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. -Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with -waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after'October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
• applied from a lagoon that is' a component of a swine farm shall be at
Ieast 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal: Animal
waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste, shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not. to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged, into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application .site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
--- - -- = --- -- - --- --- -- -- ---- P -
513490 Database Version ] .06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 S ecification Aa e 2

applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
0 on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used
on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications.of animal waste during the crop
season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons.. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60. days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
------------------------- - -------------------------- *513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 Specification Page 3

waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
• application rate than a nitrogen; based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*----..-..------------- ----------------------------
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 Specification Page 4

E
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed to
avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
--- -------------- - -•- --- - ----- ---- - -- -- ----- - -- - ---- -------- - _
513490 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-20-2000 Crop Note Page l

77'AO'
d
21
L
ni
d7
77*0
UNI
L
4 �h4
O'l
'JA
2.3
3.7
gM
I'Loll
it

0 EA IER GEN CY ACTION PLAN
PHONE `UTABERS
DWQ - S / - y7°e? .
EMERGENCY MANAGENENT SYSTENI - 513 Jlv
SWCD .1[% 171 _T 3 -3vir-1
lv-RCS (2/2) 5_973- =U sr/
T-his plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowin;, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen: This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
ail employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation: this may or may not be
possible. Sugsested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of darn.
• b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is, entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
1
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion' to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c: Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leahace From flush systems. houses.:Llid separator: -action include:
. a. Stop rrec.._cle pump.
b. Stop irri_'atien pump.
C. Makc sure no ;iphvn occurs.
�1. slup -,I[ in ilie house, tiu_ h ;% stz.;1;. or ;olld ;epsra(ors,
L,1:::1"i,C: I S. . �;'=h

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catchall seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowine animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clav rvpe soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters? '
b.. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any. damage noted, such as employer injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters'.
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal, business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 9I9-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damae.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors .address:
c. Contractors Phone:
1

0
0-
h: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (I RCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
a. Name: U S �
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify' the damage. repair the s} stem, and reassess the %vaste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
D,�

a
D4IR FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR -CHECKLIST
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead production ❑ Vegetative or wooded buffers
❑ Recommended best management practices
❑ Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn alley Wet manure -covered surfaces ❑ Scrape or flush daily
surfaces ❑ Promote drying with proper ventilation
k f ❑ Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
I `I hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas Urine ❑ Promote drying wiih proper ventilation
J� Partial microbial decomposition ❑ Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
/y
Manure dry stacks . Partial microbial decomposition ❑ Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or basin 0 Partial microbial decomposition ; ❑ Bottom or mid -level loading
Surface 0 Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
❑
❑
Agitate only prior to manure removal
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surfaces
Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Liquid drainage from settled solids
A-M
• Mixing while filling
❑.
Remove solids regularly
Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets
0 Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
0 Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection.of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑
�I incorporation within 48 hrs
surfaces
T Qtd �Q reCc
When CoVv c
@/
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
5 . $C r(,ped_
Proven biological additives or oxidants .
Flush tanks
_ _
Agitation of recycled lagoon
_❑
❑
Flush tank covers;
14
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks. with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain collection
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Box covers
or junction boxes
conveyance

Source
Cause
13MP3 to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lilt stations
• Agitation during sump tank
❑
Sump tank covers
/
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
0 Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon k l�
LPL
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
Volatile gas emission;
❑
Proper Iagoon liquid capacity;
I
0 Biological mixing;
Cl
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
a Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
j
J\ j
❑
❑
Minimum agitation when pumping;
Mechanical aeration;
`{
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler 0 High pressure agitation;
❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles . Wind drift
❑
Minimum recommended operating procedure;
❑.
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
4 f
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon;
]� f
❑
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
si�/sludge pumpings
Dead animals Carcass decomposition G✓Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water around Improper drainage; 57Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter /
Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads [K Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information :
Cattle Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater ; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU -BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU = BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
0

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause DMPS 11I Control laaseCls Site Specitie Practices -
l.irluld Systems T
r In,li i iallter5 Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated
sufticienity to remove accumulated solids front
goners as designed.
y A C1 lte:nove bridging of acctinlulatcal solids ;at
[.�abotrns :and fits Crusted
ds
disgharge
❑ Maintain lagoons, saittling basins and pits where
pesttreeding is apparent to minimize the
cnlsting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
3 inches over more than 30% of surface.
FACCNsiVe Vcgetaiivc; Decoying vebetalion C7 Maintain vegetative control along banks of
a;t���titla lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
t j accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
falong watees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Fccil Sltill.aue 01 Design' operate and maintain feed syslenls
bunkers and troughs) to nlininlize Ille
eunlulaliam of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (c.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
e wring winter_).
I.,ec+l Saw ac.c _ - Accimmlations of feed residues Reduce moistitre uccaannalatims within and - T
around inunediatc perimeter of lied storage:
areas by insuring dr:ainagc away froul site
:and/or providing aciccluale cont:ainnaew
covered bits for brewer's grain and similar high
aoisuare brain producls).
Cly Inspect for and remove or break np ;tecannul.ated
solids in filter scrips around feed storage sas
needed.
. AT.11t ff��r�n�li�t ] ] I'�'lt; t'a.•,• a

5uarrc Cause BMPs to Control lusects. Site Specific Praclices
Aniinal I folding Ai cis Accumulations of animal wastes Climinale low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and oilier locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
,,minimal.
7 Maintain fence rows and fller'strips amtind
animal holding areas to minimize
accnmulations of wastes (i:e:, inspect for and
remove or break tip accumulated solids as
nectled).
Di y Mwitirc I kindling ACCellntllatioMS of animal wastes CY Reneove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7. 10
5pslcnls day interval dewing summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles. .
C✓ Inspect for and remove or break tip accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
nrauurc handling areas as needed.
I,nr uuEre III lilmialIntl Conlacl the ConpCrative Exiciislon Service, Department of Eniomningy, nox 7613, Willi Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
Ahlle: 11, 1996. Paget

• Nfortality Management Methods
(chec.k which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface urface of the around within 24 hours after
�
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
J Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106=163.7
Q Complete incineration
G In [he. case of dead poultry only, piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of .kenculrure
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human'or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must. be
attached)
•
is

Operation and Maintenance Plan for T. J. Harris
My cattle operation is a dry manure system. It is not a highly intensive livestock
operation. It is also a very unique farming operation, so I need to explain to you, how I
am operating my farm, so that it is understood that I am doing my best job possible to
operate and maintain my farm to be environmentally friendly. The following narrative is
the best description of how I am operating and maintaining my 140 cattle operation.
• For the months of November, December, January and February, my cattle are kept on
a covered 10 foot wide by 200 feet long cement pad. The animals are kept on this
pad for about 30 minutes a day during this four month period, so they can eat dry
food and clean water, when it rains.
• (30 minutes / day X 120 days / year) divided by 525,600 minutes / year equals
only 0.68% of the year, that the cattle are under the covered cement pad.
• The rainwater from the covered roof is diverted to a grass filter strip, that was
designed by the local Natural Resources Conservation District.
• When the animals are not on the cement pad, they are grazed in the fields that are
listed in my Waste Utilization Plan. Care is taken that they do not overgraze or cause
compaction to the fields. The cattle are rotated on my fields during the grazing
periods listed on my Plan. They are provided water from water troughs placed in the
• field and if necessary, I provide additional hay for animals by bringing it to the field
they are grazing in. Great care is taken to graze in a manner to protect the
environment at all times. I have 372 acres of available grazing land for the cattle to
enjoy.
The solid, and dry manure that is collected on the cement pad during the four month
period is loaded onto my dump truck and transported to my old lagoon storage pit,
which is dry, there are NO Liquids in it. I simply dump the solids there, and wiii mix
it with green chop and woody plant material to make compost. There is no leachate,
since I do this in the pit, with guidance from the Local Conservation District. They
have no problems with this use of my old lagoon. I used to farm swine, but gave that
up, to raise cattle and make compost. As you realize, there is so little manure that I
have to make a substantial amount of compost. I am trying to build up my manure
collection to make compost that I will apply to my peanut crop in about 3-4 years.
When I have enough compost to spread, I will work with the Local Conservation
District to re -write my plan, to include this manure compost nutrient application. I
will also be making a compost tea from this nianure coMpos:.
• For technical assistance, I work closely with Will Mann of this agency, he provides
technical guidance to me, that helps me to operate my cattle operation, to keep me
current with the required regulations. He has not found any problems with my
operation and neither has the Division of Water Quality Inspector, Mr. Buster Towell.
• Signed:
Dated:

Division of Water�Quallty ., ',
t_ Faculty°Number (. Q Division of Soil and "Wafer Conservation
Q Other Agency
X, )0
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �Z� Arrival Time: � Departure Time: County:
1 Farm Name: J : , 3` Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 11 �� ✓Ys
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 ° �' �" Longitude:
" Design Current " Design Current' Design, Current.
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other .
Wet Poultry > Capacity Population Cattle 1:' <Es Capacity Popular
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑
Dairy Caw
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Be eeder
D"geef
Brood Cow
,
II Number of Structures: C
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes P"No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /[O]N ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7No NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
A ❑ NE
12128104 Continuer)

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): JZ
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , no' DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes N A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No NA ❑ NE
Na NA ❑ NE
21�No - NA ❑ NE
01"o A ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments refer to question # : Explain any YES answers`and/or any recommendations or ao other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain'situations '(useadditional pages as necessary):.
Reviewer/Inspector Name I ---1 Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: p
Page 2 off 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No QNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [3 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �NoCl NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional.Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ YesPE]No
NA ❑ NE
El Yes❑ NA El NE
El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 .12128104

Type of Visit 9,e_6lmpliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit fd Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other p Denied Access
Date of Visit:
FacilityIiermiNumber tted Certified [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: .......... i
....... I ................ �....................................................................................
Owner Name:
MailingAddress:.....................................................................................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
Onsite Representative:.........................................................I........I...........
Certified Operator: .....................................................................................
Location of Farm:
9A4 A4,n.r-&
= Time:t
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operat drr Bove Threshold: ............
County:.....f "..kw..........................................
PhoneNo: .......................................................................................
PhoneNo: ...................................................
Integrator:......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry dcattle ❑ Morse Latitude • < 46 Longitude • ' «
❑ Wean to Feeder
a ❑ La er
y
❑ Feeder to Finish
i ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
i� ❑ Other
' e E H;Tflt1 Des>e'
it
❑ Farrow to Finish'
❑ Gilts
Boars
Disc�es & Stream I.mnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes / ?To
❑ Yes F No
❑ Yes ❑'1 T�o
❑ Yes zP1'r4o
❑ Yes No
Z'No ❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑1 0
Structure $
Identifier: ...........................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
Continued

Fatili tuber: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes /No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 'E No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ,'No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ENo,
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes p� No
elevation markings? `
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1 1&0
I I - Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes PA0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
PWO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
poRio
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes dNo
19, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ZNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes TZNo
Air Quality representative immediately.
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
f ,,u /
-�"iF� : l•lyti ° op 4ia cidf►•-�
a �
^
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 71�VO

FaciM Number: L_ ( Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ YesZNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes 61No
23. Does record keeping need improve ent? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T�No
❑ Waste Application [I Fr oard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance v�i any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes & o
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? 1
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes rNNo
o
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ElYes
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ YesNo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ,fNa
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ,'No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall []Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Type of Visit 1dompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit /Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
f Date of Visit: 7Of 0 Arrival Time:
_ -: i7 M Departure Time: 9 %mt County: � Region: ie
Farm Name: �� /YES 'C:mil Owner Email:
Owner Name: IMF Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 n = [ =td Longitude: = o = 6 =
dL
` Design Current,
Sw�nr',
," �!
PouEtry
Design Current
Po
Cattle
Design Current
Ca
Capacity Population
Wet
@apaci ulation
_.� ty p
aci Pa ulation
�I?, r ty p
❑ Wean to Finish
,
l` ❑ Layer I
I I❑Dai
Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I❑Dai
Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Po
Dry :y
{
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ La
on -Dairy
l
70
❑ Farrow to Finish
ers
❑ Beef Stocket
❑Gilts
ElNon-Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
a
0—th—
Turkey Poults
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes Z, o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?.
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes �110
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

�3
Facility Number: ' Date of inspection 7 s
Waste Collection & Treatment ,,��,//
4, Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes El No �NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? []Yes ❑ No P- A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0C NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers; setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes J2 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
t. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [:�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 'C2�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[] Yes JZNo " ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �2rNq ❑ NA ❑ NE
:'� . :: -. ,.
Coffmments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/orany r f ommenda ons or any other comments.
�:r
Use drawings}of facility to betterrieaplain"sttuations::.(use addtHonal pagestassnecessa�ray)
LReviewer(InspectorName i 1�'''` Phone: • 71/eviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: V2a
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: L— Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Jam' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 90'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
P?N
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
P<A
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Rio
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�1A
❑ NE
26,
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
;?N0
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ZA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28,
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
XO
❑ NA
[I NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
[]Yes
,Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
;2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
A�°dclitianal Comments and/ar�Draw�n'gs � � f� -� S`�' A !q������,,, �' � `'�� y"��,� ���- �• � ''
12128104
12128104

.. i
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: OZ Time: Z:
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
[] Permitted O Certified Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operate bove Threshold:
Farm Name: t County: +
Owner Name: - Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry attle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 6 LL Longitude 0' 6 c{
f. Design Current Design' Current Qesign Current
Y+.k
Swine : ,.. Ga aci P.o ulation P�ouI r Ca aci P,o ulation Cattle Ca aci P,o ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer on-Dairypj
❑ Farrow to Wean'`'`
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
;; Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts d.
❑ Boars Total SSLW
- - r;.
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Sol ❑Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &c Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatm�n_t
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Str cture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: OL
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes g No
❑ Yes )ZfNo
❑ Yes No
❑ YesE�No
❑ Yes
,L�J xo
❑ Yes
2 No
Structure 6
Continued

.. 1
Facility Number: Z — 2 Date of Inspection f
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ([j No
seepage, etc.) //////
6. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes V(No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level /
elevation markings? ❑ Yes to No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes i No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes �rNo
12. Crop type _ 5 we ( NL� _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes _ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 9No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
E No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
JZ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ONo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
QN0
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
o
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�rNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
9No
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
15,No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
/� No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
3Comments WZ {refer to questions#):.Explai ;any YRS.answers.and/or.any recommendations or any other comments.
Y. .; � .
Ilse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use^additlonai;pages as necessary} Field CoPv ❑ Final Notes 's
ReviewerA n spector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: n
05103101 Continued

i
Facility Number: q Z — Zf Date of Inspection rl a
or IMM
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes xj No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 7N,
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes grNo
❑ Yes 12"�No
,Additional ikiI. _. ., ,. .< < i.'': riYW-s.S
05103101
05103101

Type of Visit j2YCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number L Date of Visit: S � Time: ��
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
PT, rmitted�Certitied [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operat d or Above Threshold:
.(� l [ii "
Farm Name:) p County:
Owner Name: `t C�c3 Phone No:
1 Mailing Address: __ 3 Se � � 5 C � ["� ( 'u-LJ ," JC 278 3-7)
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Efcattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 06 69 Longitude 0' ' 066
Design Current
Design Current t; .
Design aCurrent
Swine :_;,' Ca acit Po ulation
Poultry
Ca aci Po ulattou Cattle
Ct aci I't5 ulatiiin
❑ Wean to Feeder
ID Layer
I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
Q oo
❑ Farrow to Wean
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total 6Qs nCapacity
El Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Holding Ponds 1
,. IlJ Subsurface Drains P
IL XNo Liquid Waste Ma
Discharges & Stream Imoacts PA101",
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ElYes Dischargeoriginatedat: ❑Lagoon ❑SprayField ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [�No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (lf yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes b� No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes PNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes I,QNo
WasteCollection & Treatment �W'
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav ElYes
St ucturc 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued
AA

Facility Number: — Z( Date of Inspection a7 1
Odor Issues
26,
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
FrNo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
ElYes
P1Vo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
((
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
PNo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
VfNo
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
ElYesrM
o
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yeso
Additional Commentsandlor Drawings:
w
05103101
I

Facility Number: — Z( Date of Inspection'�-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or /
closure plan? El Yes 7r`7" No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level /
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 40
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes P40,
'"•0,
12. Crop type tscQ-F i -0AzLLA�i
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Z] NN
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes I No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? El Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yesio
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
AETNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail have Certificate Coverage & General Permit
to of or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
o
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
WNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
2fyt'4N
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�Vo
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (referyyato question#) Explain any YES answers and/ar any recommendations or any o er commetpi .rawln
:�°:i�"# �i,flsaT{ : _ - .- s�+. ..- �C[ 4 e-st 'a. +.7LI
Use a [Fl facilit to,better
's of explain situations. {use additioal,pagenecessary)
1'�P2'�' E
Field Gopy ❑Final Notes
�i•'� Sid � S c'"V . -��S i � 9 �
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name I ' la . �Yl _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 1 17 dZ
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number ZI � Date of Visit: i0 o Time: tD = pD
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted [3 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 93 Registered Date Last Opera"d loAbove Threshold:
Farm Name: T...n!?3 ... County: ....17:.1..........?........................................................
................................................................................... ..
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................ Phone No:.....................................................................................
FacilityContact: .....................:..........................................................Titlej:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.... �.............................................................. 1,-.. ... .... .7$........................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................................................................................ I....... .... ­Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
S r� M oN C - l 4 I q
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle []Horse Latitude Longitude
Design.:Current Design,— Currenfa Design Cureent
Sluing Ca aci Population , Poeiltry . ' ; Ca aci ; Population Cattle Capacity . Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer on -Dairy
❑ Other
Total De"s'gn.'Capacify
:TtitaUSSLW
Number of i.agoons N A- ', ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
[] Spray Field Area
r� 'Hoidin Ponds I seyd Traps.,:- ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�' +
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
'O
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ANo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes JdNo
$tructure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .... tilt................... ......... ........................ ...............................................................................
.................. "................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
Continued on back

Facility Number: L Z j Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yeslo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes � No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes'12NO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No{UTA,
Waste Aunlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P111a
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes p-No
12. Crop type Er S c,k C- , LL
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMPV ❑ Yes J21q0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes jrNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ,�No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Er
No
Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ,�No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes J"No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ YesfTNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ,O'No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 7No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No
17,*Wp q,-s* '.ot. &Qc}epcie . r r. � e$ � `E4g ;sMsit; • Y;ou wa11•see 0.0.4.0..PW . .
corres oriciei�ce alwli this visit:
•Lr-r.m .i1•;.t" f !I—VJ.— f. -,. F_ ! _tl , -.." I ".—z"N " q-- .1 .1,11, .:xkii ii3r - ' f y •1", t.u'2414,K8. ,=rl.. arl �..� :..•,. r•.rvr3r rr.aapnzrOL—I .a..— n ..i n_ .W mod. n.. , n_ v s. ,_ e. n_ .
- -3.n _. '.I+f v r ry -kv� N't -
Reviewer/Ins ector Name , (c vu}lli " .' t ' ' !i #
�,.
9 4, p
p 3 � i. h
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:al,"— Date: g/pp

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additiona .Comments an
or ra ngs r s ��
�, ,,�
�� E ' a s E'
5100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment •
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, GovernorZI �_�
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary , � � r 244i '
ry NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
,t ,1
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ebruary 28, 2001
T.J. HARRIS
T.J. HARRIS FARM
1183 SIMMONS CREEK ROAD
LITTLETON NC 27850
Subject: Application No. AWC420021
Additional Information Request
T.J. Harris Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Harris:
Enclosed is the Operation and Maintenance Plan, we discussed at length over the phone. Please
sign and date this and return it to me by April 28, 2001. I have enclosed a self addressed stamped
envelope for your convenience.
I have also found the Operator in Charge official memo that states a dry manure operation, such
as yours is, does not need to have a designated certified operator. This memo was dated for July 21,
1998, that means that you could have notified the budget folks to stop billing you, back then! Please
make a copy of this letter to keep and send the memo to the office where you are supposed to be sending
your Operator in Charge fee, and don't send the fee, since you don't have to anymore. Write a note
stating that you are NOT REQUIRED to pay that fee, and have not been required to since July 21, 1998,.
make sure to attach a copy of the memo I am sending you. Tell them to please stop sending you the bill
immediately, because it is a waste of government time and money, and that it is confusing you. Keep a
copy of everything you send. I think after this is done, you will be okay!
Again, thank you for your time, and I hope you have better experiences with our agency in the
future. I look forward to finishing your permit review, after you return, sign and date the Operation and
Maintenance Plan.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested .
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below.
NCDENR-Non Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
16I7 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 42-0021
Tom J. Harris
Page 2
The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before April 28, 2001 or the
Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your
facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], ext. 375.
Sincerely,
Theresa Nartea
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Halifax SWCD-Will Mann
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T.J. Harris T.J. Harris Farm
Rt 2 Box 216
Littleton NC 27850
Farm Number: 42 - 2I
Dear T.J. Harris:
1 � �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that T.J. Harris Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension 544 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
19 Ste e
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
T.J. Harris
T.J. Harris Farm
Rt 2 Box 216
Littleton NC 27850
Dear T.J. Hams:
I 6T'?0W'J
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
December 30, 1999 -
[)L.YkK Rp%L4IG44 Fi�iilCl ���,'�
Subject: Fertilizer Application-Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Numberr42=21
Halifax -County.
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that, the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincarel ,
� w /77
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number Z
Date of Inspection 2�
Time or Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmN:ime:.........V.......i�'i........1-.rT1�'................................ County..........._....%.................................................
Owner Name:........... ." -..- ........................... Phone.No:...'L'S......................................
2-.. ... eel
.. .... 1...p ............
........ ........... ............. .....
FacilityContact: .......... 1. ! ............................./................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: � C . � D i� z l �......................................................................................... `....._...._. ............ I....................
Onsite Representative:.... f ......... r..'..`r..................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:' ` Operator Certification Number:
..................................................................................................................
Location of Farm: /
......................................................................................... ............................................. .
Latitude • ' •4 Longitude ' 6 «
Design Current ;p t �' Des�gnE .Current �� Design Cui,r'ent
Swine , Capacity Population..,Poult "
tyCa acit Po ulation
;:.. t'3' ,. -. Ca actt Po ulation Cattle .
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
❑ Dair
FElQLayer
Non Layer
on Dairy
.I
❑ Other
TOWL eMeii Capacity
Total SSLW
INumber of'Lagoons 4r { : ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holdmg'Pond s/'Solid`Tiaps i `'' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any. part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other /
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? El Yes —�"N/o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/rain`?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............ ........................................................................................................................... ...........................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes �NoZ
❑ Yes
❑ Yes VNlo
Strucl
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Z — L Date of Inspection Z
b. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No/
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application"
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑Yes No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes C KIN
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 7,91,
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes o
I& Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Reguir•ed Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o
25. Were additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
., iMhtiOtis :or• Oficienries -W4re noed• 00ing this:visit• Yoit Wiil•feeoiye 1io fuhr ,
::..;..:'.,corresnondence.ab0utthis .••.• •.•.''..', .•.••:•:•...- :
3/23/99

[] D' sion of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Qther Agency
Division of Water Quality
122outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
uu rr wiuu i �nnw iu o�rnrr��rrrru ���
+ Date of Inspection
Facility Number V
Time of Inspection 6 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered Certified 13 Applied for Permit' E3 Permitted 1E3 Not Opera Date Last Operated: ..................
Farm Name: / i✓� s County:... /T.ft:4,
.......................1................................................................................................... d ............................. .
OwnerName:...1 r..:....� ..:........! .'.. 5...........:............................................................ Phone No:.....�..z...^.. 5..�...�... 3 �,Sf ....................
Facility Contact: .......�,� .�3'�!^ A' ............. ................... Title:................................. Phone Na:.............................,.....................
Mailing Address:.....#".!.....Z.......0 k Z i L, yt/C........5...:......................................... ..........................
............................................................................
Onsite Representative:...... .. ..�...`..S ............................................ ...: Integrator: ....... 4V..W ................ .......
Cei•tifaed Operator .............. .......................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.....................
Location of Farm:
r. ......_ .t i
Latitude �'-�« Longitude
w Nv3 , Design Current
Design Current'*Design Current
Swme , ry „ Capacity ,Population
Poultry
Capacity -Population Cattle Capacity„Population
Feeder
❑Layer
❑ D ' -
[E-21FeEedero Finish
❑Non -Layer
Non Dairy
u
❑ Farrow to Wean
r
`❑
r
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
;.
Total Design Capaciy
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
' Tota15SL,W
:,,.
Number of Lagoons / Hgldrng Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area
ID Spray Field Area
.. ` . °'
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
x,
., . _ ....t<. r ... ,.., 4
Ew .E
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L o
117-
❑ Yes L3'No
❑ Yes ;'K�o
❑ Yes a
El Yes 10
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
Cl Yes No
Continued on back

Faitti€ty umber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Struetur" (Laeoous.11oldine fonds. Flush Pits, etc,)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
.............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):...............................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
kc,* ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M o
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �5..115�w�
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ��Nq//
o
El Yes
❑ Yes o
U✓4- ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
/jNo.viola'tionso'deficiencies'were-no'ted-duririgthis:visit.-You.will receive-nfllurttier'
e6rresj)66deince about this.visit. ;
❑ Yes ZrNo
.......................................
❑ Yes W ,V O
❑ Yes B XNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 1`-ONo
I
❑ Yes
El Yes
10 7 4, s 11)9 c: (. 4 y 1 S q I��j/11'r" - 'aR -(tZ 7 CW-It'lO W or y{. a l
G•r iW-v-a 5 ` w n t l !9 r %
IUQ L irrp s 1
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f_^.� . Date: 11 / Z-,

❑ D; ,sion of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
tvision of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DAVQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other �
Date of Inspection O
FacMt Number Z
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 13 Certifieed�,, © Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated;,,,,,,,,,,,,,
FarmName: ..J'.. .�.'J..r!'1 ............ County: ............................................................... .......................
............................................................
Owner Name: Phone No: f 5 A..6........ ....
Facility Contact: j� 1�i9i-✓, .f ... Title: ....... Phone No :...................................................
Mailing Address:.�.1..��... 5.`.�}'..�`a...C..r'�L..��....,.'..........�:..I �I �T�?�'�......��G.....,.....�. �.�5�... ..........................
s
Onsite Rep resentative:.......1?.rF.S.....✓✓' 1............................................... IntegFator:........... ............ .............................................................
Certified Operator-,...71-.....'L... .............................................................. Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm: /
J
.. ... 1
Latitude 0• =' 44 Longitude • 6 "
g 1 D g Design Curreint t"
Dest n . Current, est n Current
-,apacity`�F'opulation u ttryEl Capacity�xPopulation` Capacity Pgpulat on ,
(] Wean to Feeder
_I
Dle
Pon
❑ Feeder to Finish
EEE ayer
-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
+�
R
.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
.x f
❑A
Farrow to Finish
Orti
F; 61al Design�Caoi&i �, ,;
❑ Gilts
❑Soars
r_4� n Total SSLW
;,.. o
Number of Lagoons % Holding Ponds f 2 ., ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJDLagoonArea ID Spray Field Area �
ME.E�
aW,
_.
All,�'
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made9
b. if dischan, is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Ile
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there.any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any partof the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97 -
❑ Yes 2<.
❑ Yes ���O-
0 Yes /
❑ Yes U o
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
Continued on back
:l

Facility Number: -- Z
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lap-oons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes ❑ No
44-10— ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard(ft):.................................... ......................•..........................•..........................•.............................................................•.........................._...._........
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
El Yes
EN
]I.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes�M�O_
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? A,!`
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste_ Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
r
Crop type f`:4.S.GI-:/J......��...l�r(.N/✓...............................................................................................•.................•..........................................
lb.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?�
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2KO
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
2<0
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N ,
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. We ny additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
®`No.violatioits-or deficiencies. we're h6ted,during this: visit'.'You.will receive ho' further',
:.•correspbndence.ab:out this:visit:•" ,•.��.�:.•::-�•. .:�.•.-.•::::� ::�.�: .:. ; .�.•.�:�:-.�. .•
(Jiv�rrGf � bct.'l � s7�1/—S�9G/L.,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
W
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
C
Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
December 5, 1996
T.L. Hams
T.L. Harris Farm
Rt 2 Box 216
Littleton NC 27850
Dear Mr. Harris:
1DEHNR
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: T.L. Hands Farm
Facility ID #: 42-21
Halifax County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System 4.
Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,P15WA
_1 Health and Natural Resources • •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 14, 1995
Mr. J. J. Harris
Route 2, Box 215
Littleton, North Carolina 27850
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cattle Operation
State Road 1414
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Harris:
On August 9, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In
addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

J. J. Harris
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
�Judy E. arr tt
r` Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District_
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

• FIFO P.02/02
�- DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
�• UL-14-1995 15:2e FROM
Site Requires Immediate.Attenron.
Facihty No. y_ 2 2-1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENi'AL. MANAGEMENNT
ANTMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORn
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: 7�, J I-)n"rrf s-
Mailing Address:
County:._.NAY ►
Integrator- Phone:9-5-
On S Ue Representative: AVIq — Phone:
Physical Address/Locadon: -S
Type of Operation: //Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: `7 n . O Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE _ . ITEM Certification Number: ACNFW
Latitude: 3 r<i �� Z 7 Longitude: 77 �' 13 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have suifciew freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxirnately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Kam$ Actual Freeboard: �TJrt. .I,nche's w�-
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)2-Y46-er-S6 Was any erosion observed?--Y�_�
Is adequate land available for spray'? Xas-er,N Is the cover crop adequate? Oor No
Crop(s) being utilized: Cyr +J (1w ­ J o!�6 A Yk r 5-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings J?e or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
^,[ a^imal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or L '' �
a:lirnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes `"'
'> animal waste discharged into waters of the state by than -made ditch, flushing system, or otter
•;irni!a-r man-made cievices? Yes ore If Yes, Please Explain.
i c,; Inc faQility maintain adequate waste niartagenacnt .reeordsr(volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop 0 Yes �r
Additional Coaunents: F er- ( - o_w+ G�±f1 e �'"• l� Or /� -1
GGt ✓r-4— f 1
OVI rJ J l vYc- • "I/Z, Y. S r^ Or a C e J U G
tss: Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed -
TOTAL P.22

JL'L-14-1995 15:26 FRQr1 DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
Site Requires Immediate Attcn on
Facility No. '/
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: _ -- �; - 9 ` , 1995
Farm Name/Owner. r J
rrix
Time:
Mailing Address: 0 Z 11 le I LT^ L Z '7 o
County: • t7• r P_A X _ _ _ _ _ _.•.
Integator: Phone: 3 6 4 / ��—
On Site Representative: A09 , Phone:
Physical Address/Location: f 0 / Y / q�- - _-
Type of Operation: ^nSwine Poultry Cattle e!!�l _
Design Capacity: `7 "� Number of Animals on Site: b
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 ii ' ' Z % '. Longitude: 2? * _y 1.3 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm even[
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No A/� Actual Freeboard: ___—Ft. Inches w
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)�.�r Was any erosion observed?­"Ye�
Is adequate land available for spray? Zas-er-Ne- Is the cover crop adequate? Oor No
Crop(s) being utilized: 6I WJ L .ar- J �!; J � -4 f G _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellings' �e or No
100 Feet from Wells? (1 or No
^_c animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line So -cam? Yes or 1,E)
sairnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lme'! Yes cl To
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by in -made ditch, fluslaing system, or orher
,imilar roan -made de,%ices? Xes orl it Yea, Please Erplait►_
'"n ?Vti trnc ricility maintain adequate waste aMnagesnent records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop.)'? Yes
Additional Comments: F$C�
C s r L. cL -{ , �� 2—� sn f.+�a i f� i(, ., S G, I ¢ — S C. 5` J
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed..