420010_PERMIT FILE_20171231

04 Type of Visit: 0 Com 'Once Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: rrival Time: Departure Time: Z® County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
e
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: E3' L( t 1 r3g 1' / /
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry`
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Non -La er
Dairy Cow
Dai Calf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
FaVow to Wean
Des€gn
C•urrent
Dry Cow
arrow to Feeder
6717e
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Qther
—Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesFNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -i Date of Inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes gN0"' ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): t t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rest, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYPe(s): r� 14, 5/4-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
go
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
25 No ` ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfer ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

jam' Z_
Facili Number: Z - Z,0 1 jDate of Inspection: ( Irl2--
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes:No
NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes D NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other,comments,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations -,(use additional pages as necessary).,:-'T
231 r z_
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (l 6f f ` �L ,,!r 41"4 C
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:12-
2/4/2011

(Type of Visit: Q Cance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Cy` 2-) Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: C�}12h� 7� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Coat &i9-Q t' h
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator,
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Sw
Design
C parity
MR1,
Current
Pop:
Wet Poulfr
a
Design Current
Cap ca ity Pop.
Cattle
Design C Trent
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
d-4(33
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Da i Calf
Feeder to Finish
IDairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D , Roul
III
Ca acillPa .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to finish
JLayers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
L
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other'
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
a I-:
�Noo
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
21
NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

/ Facility Nbmber: U/ Z - f 0 1 ; - I Date of Inspection: /0 - 2 —% I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
e'N; NA
No ❑ NA
Structure 6
❑ Yes VNo. ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environFNoZ
reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes CZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 ibs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r
At J61-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving; crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VT.146❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
jNo
❑ NE
IS. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes UVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

r'�_
Facili Number: Z - S Date of Inspection: 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N [] NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑NA []NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
a ..... . . .. ......... ... . .........
C©mments'(referrto. uestion #1..€ExRla n' an ';YE .answers andlor,.nn{/'adilitranallrecommendations•or'any ot#i'er comments
,�., ➢ - / i � dl � :I � .% !.I � .
uim€€t� !,i,a�rpl,,€catPlPr€tf<dl (II Gd n !! III 11 1, fifitar€pi'ii!?l1i4>�fllrlfli� !i€ , t,
i u f I P( s1i 11� !iP Ill i @ dl! .f. a es �m,-,neecessi� lilfi (I l d lrlit �r ltP i i l ? � rlllfr(l idi,`�' +li? hl {'rl ltll lid'#1 i6JFl�3 lliir j It { i i ,
Use drawjngs,offacili,,tobetfer,,explamasetuatiotisl,(use;addiionahp .g
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 6?19 ?9% V U p
Reviewer/inspector Signature: f 5e, .540k C r w -e-
Page 3 of 3
Date: l d" 2— I S
21412015

M.
1Type of Visit: ,EO Co nce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: _ -417M_ �J _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
On site Representative: Fv r, Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Rai€ "$ =dc)!
€
n
is
DesignCurent
DesignseurrentDyy►esE
Gur:rent
Capacityop.
'-��
Wet Po dtry
���.k'��Swi
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Gapacity Pop.
can to Finish
Layer
Dair Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design 'Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dc ,ll?oult . ;
Ca aci
Plop.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
:Other
; :
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
SfVtInlVM.emlaw.aif
itulalu W€pylhnl/L€ii}gt6p}yN'.HfYIlhN9.f4wnYftrtzl[Enal Widdilaula1111iiiPat6
MMaEx Ea€elY:nw€aEF![EtlanNaEH.IBai4exbttX}�Mk814lffllxllaes%PE[E[Illatlef@EetiatanalY;A
€3iYla[NYaif
�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Faefility Number: 2- Date of Inspection- 10, 2- /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
El Yes
o ❑ NA
[] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? I
❑ Yes
i�lo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Zj No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment hreat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes!No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN 0 PAN > 10% or l0 lbs, ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
rWindow
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesVNog
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectioVO�NA
dge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Z - ( Date of Inspection: yoo �-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Z No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Ycs
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
IV
0- 3,7?
CA t , 6".v
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
�C?'- 5--(2
Phone: 7 ! I - y 20 0
Reviewer/inspector Signature: tat,-sP2- _ (pi,{Q—
Page 3 of 3
Date: 16 - Z ` 1 1
21412015

-A.
Type of Visit: fiD Co nce inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: y5 Departure Time: 4 t7 County: Region:
Farm Name: re -1-n A, 5' Z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: L tN- 21 N iA �_ q Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
ine Capacity Pap. Wet Poultry
Wean to Finish La er
Design Current
Capacity
Dai Cow
Qesign Rllpeit
Capacity P
Wean to Feeder
LFNon-Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
/S
Design C*urrent
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P.uultr,
Ca aci P,o
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
111.
Other
Other
Turke s
Turke PouIts
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes INo [] NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Farili N�imber: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[3NA
[3 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes❑
VNo NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
1257No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2 /No/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): l '' r M kc—J4—, 5'^ 9
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
g
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YesN
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑,NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfer Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: Z- f2 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NNA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes rNo NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
se
sl#el
L-40' 4
un�
Po q r 2 cA . k .-( R Z & --- pi um-i 4) 3 ti j J, f - aw4- C—
,34n A S I ti4x- re-"W4— L
Clt, l r 6 rq-iL, jj• ( C , ; —/ 7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ] . S TM,4 e— t/
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: �t) — ` {7
21412015

Z_r
Type of Visit: fQ Once Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-un O Referral O Emergenev O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: '-I _ 6. 1 Arrival Time: t-- Departure Time: O b County:
Farm Name: M_Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: & da f Q14 -e a e'iJ Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Swine
Design
C*apacity
Current
Pop.
$ Design: Our ent
Vet Poultry .g C city{{ Pop.
k tta�tt'r'Y
La er
Non -La er
Cattle
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
#
Den
i]r� Poultry :; Ca aci
pol
:Current
Po .
Dai Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Lilts
La ers
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Qther,
Other
Turkeys
Turkey POUItS
Other
f'iNiY1f�Y.Y.� �!
mYiFi
1.'�i1:#!CY
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Ntt ber: - Date of Inspection: ' f'i '
G
- a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
El
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
/No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment hreat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesVNo❑NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): i3e r o, k.d
13. Soil Type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
a ro riate
❑Yes
0 I�Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
©% ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D Yes
VD NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes[Zy
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the box
PP P
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

r
Facili NUZ er: - Date of Inspection: y G
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONco)�DNA
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document D Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ON E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Cornmetits `(refer to question. #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional; recommendations or any other. comments.
Use°drawinas of'facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) .. .
De rt' L i e_ n Cy Po ► - k� o*- - d v 1' 6 to-�, o4c5 �h�Q.
5jgdjp,-sur✓e( 1(-(51 /6
t,j = �, j9
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ­7 11 — t1 2-#o
Date: � ' (d7—IL
21412015

_f6_.
Type of Visit: ® Co ance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 19 7'( Arrival Time:I tZ_J-[L I Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Po' x)-' SZ_� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: C Age— 1(9 h e- e'w-'
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
wine C Sapacity
Wean to Finish
C►►arrant Design Current
Fop. W�t!wn_acity Pop.
Layer
Design C►arrant
Cattle Capacity Fop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
11
jNon-Layer
I E]
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
1111111N1111111111
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current
D . F,ouI . acit P,o .
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
JLavers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? /
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
No [0]N ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: Z d I jDateof inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
-NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes��NoM
NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[I YeseV2Z
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
ONE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes — Noo 0 NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CVO ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) TTT
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): /
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
WN
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
eN
❑ NA
[] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall InspectieNo
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412014 Continued

FAility Number: - Date of Inspection: -- - j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes [:]No
[3 NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any.yES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional°pages a}snecessary)
(,q d5l, "aQ � I. 2 6 / v
x/ � 3- 3 D
0 r, lf. S o
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l�l t 5 7 0-7t- �Z Zf J
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �� /" Y Zeds
Date: —1 y— (-s _-
2/4/2014

Type of Visit: X Compli Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: © Departure Time: 0 County:
Farm Name: I- 'L— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: u:� i2 l &L't ZL'n _- I Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design ulen
III
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D , P,onitr
Ca aci
P,o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
I==Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
fh 11
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rNo"'
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters o t e State (ga ons) .
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /0[] NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faeili Number: jDateof Inspection: 2•- ��
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
5�Z—
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes <No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1 rr'' k J-14 •z rq rsk- in
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yes
,�]
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[] YesVIN,
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Z� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste TriNo
fers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield El120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiSludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o [3 NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: V Z_ - ! 2 1 1 Date of Inspection: l2 •-f /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes �O ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ONE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments..
Use'drawings of facility to better=explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
l h ` f-C sit vv `� 2__ 24
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: 79 ( ^ V ZC%C_>
Date: l Z �/ 5���
21412011
Page 3 of 3

V
f -27 -(
Type of Visit: C Coin nee Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: -IL J Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: t� A a- 1 0-6-1 G,0— yk'� Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design
Capacity
I
I
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Q—rxylP,outt .
Layers
Design
Ca aci4YP,o
Current
.
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Gilts Non -Layers
Boars Pullets
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No 0 NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ YesFNoM
K'
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑YesA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
L\�
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacKity Number: - jDate of Inspection: 3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): S— rl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
N ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes 0<0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste A1312lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): % / k J iq i :5741 9 —A -' n s
v
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�"N NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
TNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [—]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [] Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacitity Number: Z - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ef
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments refer to question # • Explain an 'YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or. an .other,cominents ,,, J t'`
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
JCGc �Ln �` �� c�! Gam, L ; �� �� -f-, `,� .
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 71 ! ` C)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (3 Lt S 4f2 (_0Q 4? E 1
Page 3 of 3
Date: &1%2
ziaaall

L(t k
t ype of visit: o nce inspection v operation tcevtew u Nrrucrure Evaivatron V i eennecat Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
i u. nn u� Il. unntlw YiTi IIIi YI���W�
Date of Visit: �l 1 !� Arrival Time: Departure Time: 1 Z (] County: Region:
Farm Name: r 4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: [ Pt `� &kecr `t
Certified Operator: [� 3 r — 1 (_3 A a et
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry ` Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
iry Cow
Wean to Feeder
Layer
iTy Calf
Feeder to Finish
iry Heifer
Farr -to Wean
"Design Current
Dry Cow
arrow to Feeder
Dr, P.oultr. Ca aei Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 24011�o NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes XNoEJ
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes rNo
NA [3 NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYes NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

li acili Number: Z - (7 jDate of Inspection: / 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes No NA
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �3
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
-5-2-
NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N1
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes Z(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): I� Q r A"',1 Fy
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[/:6o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
FA/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ W UP [:]Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections/No
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacili Number: V 2-- Date of Inspection: r( 2 I I Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other commcnts
Use drawings of facility to Wetter. explain SOW' ations. (im additional pages. as necessary) =,;, . - �` �� �_� �� �, .. �, � 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/lnspector Signature: f��srz Date: to 2-/ �T
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit Com - nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 (,3 Arrival Tlme: © Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 'iZ , Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: C�3iv� tQ "tFB h
Certified Operator: �t +►^ Goff [ (�_
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 0 = = I[ Longitude: ❑ e = 6 =
Li
low
Design
ji�
C•uerent Design Current Design Current
Population Wet Foultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
P!wneCap�city
Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dai Cow
Weto Feeder
Non -Layer
El Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stacker
Non -La ers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
El Turkeys ❑Beef Brood Cow
❑Turkey Points
El Other Number of Structures:
❑ Farrow to Wean
M�Fa7ow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Giits
PEJ13oars
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes
IQ N NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
2TNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[]Yes
N�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
;No❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: L�--
Date of Inspection 2 i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): l/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 �No❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes CTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) !_'r`7`�`f , &f'!n" C4A -
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
P [I NA
❑ NA
VNo
[INA
❑ NA
❑No El NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name'' Phone: ZO [7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L727/ve.Date: 7 Z11 d
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 4 L — (t, Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes g< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA El NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [I Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facilityfail to have an active) certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Y P g
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
._
AdditionalCmepointsand/orDrawtngs
w
w
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit Cam I nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Z Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: [4/2 q0 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ^ t� 7� Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: 1 y
Certified Operator: jz&t f
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
r Integrator: f2
J_
Operator Certification Number -
Back -up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = i = « Longitude: = ° = 6 0 f4
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine Cap�y Population
i�.Po: Capacity
Population
Cattle
Cap�ci�ty
Population
❑ an to Finish
❑ Layer
❑Dai Cow
❑ an to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑Dai Calf
ElFeeder to Finish
�.
ElDai Heifer
ElFa w to Wean
;Dry Poult11;Y'A'
ElD Cow
Farrow to FeederEl
❑ Layers
Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Beef Stocker
❑Gilles
Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
10 Beef Brood Cow,
x..
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
IDOther
Number of Structures:
c
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z — Date of Inspection (b
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
a NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
;No❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): d
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ONo NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No 2 NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Cropj Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 131e. +r m 1,, 4 4 , S"-' a f`iA- 6,, S , C'D
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
e(No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
lYo ElNA
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
77 T
ReviewerlInspector Name Phone: _ `)�%�/ 20
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 2 of 3
Date: C -- O T
12128104 Continued

.. 5 Z"- I
Facility Number: — j Date of Inspection Z Z
Required Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�()E] NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections Elaher Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yesj-No
No
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
2NA
NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑YesNo
❑ NA
El NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No - NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or DriMngs,
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

l2 ((I Lot
ZH / D
Type of Visit odo lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: %Z � Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: F4121, '5_ 2_' Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: & In L
�—e
Certified Operator: c_
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator•
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 6 [� A = Longitude: = ° =1 = 4{
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swtne Capacity .Population
Wet .Poultry C►opacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
Erfarrow to Feeder p
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Beef Stocker
Gilts
ElNon-La ers
ElBeef Feeder
EEJ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharzes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �"` NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo[0:1'�NA
A ❑ NE
❑ YesA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): L.2 el
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes E rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th at, notify DWQ
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes j VNo
El NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) -� ri`� . ��� / < <-,5, C -� � , tjo_A_j_X
— —
f
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ElNA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El
NA
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
,,;°; �:�a''I.. Y. ..a.c:.f1t
Gomments•(refer torquest�ont#) E pl n anyft ES answeA' nd),,or any r#ecommendat�ons or,;anyother comments. r t
[J a dra*Inistiaf fa61ityta bettereexplaln s�tuatlnns. (use'.additianal pagesias necessary);. k .
Name Reviewer/Ins ector r
p Phone: ��� Z 6y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: :� Z Date: Z ( r
JVZY/04 Continuea

�,� a7 �:i �l �A '�7-'r J y '� �:.t. ra .� -giS''�c i�� -.H-�'.,�,,. y t �� i. �-R ".. r�r ...+y"-":

I{acility Number:412--al Date of Inspection
Repaired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZfNoEl NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑ ether
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspection�No
❑ cather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes
-NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pen -nit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes 1` NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYes rN ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Yes C3 A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewcr/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional'Co'minents aEtdLoi•aDraivin' s
J
T
12128104

Facility Number (, Z
0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation `
0 Other Agency Ya�"
Type of Visit 0 Co lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: // Arrival Time: //p ,:EDeparture Time: County:
Farm Name:Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 144, wQ r - _
Certified Operator:
or 14
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
�o
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Region:
Longitude: = ° = 1
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
I
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Nd NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes r(No [I NA ❑ NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
1212"4 Continued

. Facility Number:q Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): le
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ro(Ell
A El NE
El Yes A ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta�N�o
otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`? ❑ Yes
A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need []Yes ;No
o NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 12g - ►nh,.-A, s>+-. �''j
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
[�No ElNA
No ❑ NA
6 X�o❑ NA
No NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
�� 12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection l
Required Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
"NoNA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropiiate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
oNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections
❑ tither Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
'NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
�oEl NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YesF<NoNA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
2b.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
Other Issues
7j]
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP'?
❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
I2/28/04
5

0
Facility Number ( p
40 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Z Com ' nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 ( a Arrival Time: Departure 'rime: County: Region:
Farm Name: ___. _._ . _...._ Owner Email: __...
Owner Name: Gly?� 5 z Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: tl
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Phone No:
]Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ 0 ❑ 4 ❑ Longitude: ❑ o = ` ❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity °Population Cattle
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Fapowto Wean
ErFarrow to Feeder o v
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ B oars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZN
NA El NE
El Yes
NA ElNE
6
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7 N ❑,NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo
NA El NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes:No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta;N7E]
, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`? El NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes No NA El
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes rrNo
NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: (Z I G
1212814 Continued

v
Facility Number: — Z,6 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �oO A ❑ NE
El -Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NI NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [IYesZN
NA El NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El YesNA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit`? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues '
'
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

III".
Facility. Number I C1 2
r�
bivision.of Water Quality
OPIVIsion,of Soil and Wale
Other;Agency
5 llkj
{
� f
ti
on '
Type of Visit •t� Co nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: l L(i 0& Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: I°' E ed— �t _� Z Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,.-_-
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: / Integrator:
Certified Operator: ZeK, en�d� ' Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Di
ine Ca
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
ier
Region:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ c = = Longitude: = ° = 4 = 6f
Current Design Current t Design
y"s Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population's ,rCattle Capacity ,]
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures
77
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4 o , ❑ NA [INE
❑ Yes o [INA ❑ NE
ElYes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number• L —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Y fi
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ZNoaNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure Structure 6
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes WO
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thrIE3
otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No [I NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNwl� NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) t; N-A." ( A-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[]Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
,ONO El NA ❑ NE
F
NA ❑ NE
NA ElNE
NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or`any!'.other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):,
t
AL
Reviewerllnspector Name I _ - - _ — �_— - -- T
Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
i it -
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZNlqo NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes :No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El YesP/DNA
NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El YesNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El YesNA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit .QS Corn ce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time: 6 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �r:4C"_ &.�Z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: r A e— L 62t"�2-G✓__ .
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = = Longitude: = ° = I = 11
Design';
Current
;Y;a A
Deg^ R �Curent
Design
Current
Swine Capacity
Population
Wetl'oultry
apaci.typopulation
Cattle
Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
❑ Nan -La et
❑ Dairy Calf
El Feeder to Finish
i
El Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultryx
El Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -Ira ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
10 Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? El Yes;No
o ❑ NA [I NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N 0 NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El El
o ❑ NA [I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ElYes No ❑ NA El NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Date of Inspection of
Facility Number: ilz —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
�❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural Freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ZfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
notify DWQ
tZoa
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes;No
-NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
`
l l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Croptype(s) 4-pv r pYr✓'►�
13. Soil type(s) E j -- yo%y,'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
iCi No NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ElNA
ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NYE] NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
D 10 []NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/inspector Name ' � ' `;•' '3 - 9 ^
li e`� , �-� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: [ Date: 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Dumber: Z — b Date of Inspection t
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
ElNE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
es r❑
No ELNA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NI?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional-Commentsand/or.Drawirigsn��'� ,�yf,,; s P
1 V �-CG- 4, i l2 - (z) v y 7 /as"U - C-
hs
12128104

I . . w
Facilin Number
Date of Visit: Time: u
/ Not O erational Below' Threshold
L,I�Permitted ©Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
!Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: �T
Certified Operator: I 1 �
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0• 06 " Longitude ' • 44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acit-v Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver I I❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow ro Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons h {LJ_Subsurface Drains Present JjLJ Lagoon Area JLJ Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 [] No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ 1-aeoon ❑ Svrav Fie€d ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):
05103101
❑ Yes eo
❑ Yes
[I Yes;N;0o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ;0�:
El Yes 4a1Vo
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 42--- Date of Inspection ell 7 e,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
M*aste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type ge-r -,I k C109J �•� r',i' 1 f✓r� — -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAV6'MP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the faciliry fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify- regional DN Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie.r discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer; Inspector fail to discuss reviewiinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes La'l�io
❑ Yes P40
El Yes
❑ Yes fo
❑ Yes rl��o
ElYes
❑ Yes Nio
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑
No-
E3Yes ""1_J No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
ICI No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
No
❑ Yes
h o
❑ Yes �No-
rqo
j"
El Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
�© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence aboui this visit.
.,'.!-N 4 .� , ,� �, N•-_ .tis:t.:;iaen�ih_,•"'�.+aie"z.G".±li .hum �.y�, a 5, s�
Gmtnents(refei- to 'Eitp any YES answers:andlor,any,reeommeodattons or$ny,other cotaments..s
gneszavn:
`�- W .M.-.—.._....h.. .
Use drawings of facility to better explain sttuattons.,(use additional -pages as necessary)
❑ Field Copv ❑ Final Notes
�{ �} Er !�
.4d':{e;,;i;.43.s€?Y.�3.i{�xa'1h:i.:k,.*'€A`ww`........;.... iiHl 4hae"vi�SSR s�a�le..:C?ri..tla"laiaE�&k%iis"��5.':Mi96re{i4P€is3i..rs:3Ei€A:ErlB?#i;.i9b>'.-w.�rs+�, :�nr...�.•.�-.� a..»w+^.•.r-'--.n�nn•....w:."� 'r.ia.?'Svi�Y.�$
Reviewer/inspector Name a«� •';tom rr R i` a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

41 ti
/ Fa ' ttv Number Date of Visit: ® Time: 9 D D
Nat operational 0 Below Threshold
ermined [] Certified ©Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: - _— _ County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: _ m 4J1 N�� S'S�� Title:
Onsite Representative: /
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude ' 0 0" Longitude 0'
Current-',,,., Design Curren �' D'estgn "a` Current'
1:
Swine //:Design
` '..l.a aC�ty.
a�..�.. -;��'. I ,.�. E I tad
Po ulation 'Poult " tCa aci Po' ulatiari Cattle $ ; achy `-°Pa' ulattan .F
._
❑ Wean to Feeder
., , .Ca`f
❑�
a er - Dairy, -
5[03Non-La
Feeder to.Finish
er { Non -Doi '
[� Farxz<to Wean,
8
❑Other r , 9 t 3 � Ek.�� ?��� E,� 3, E ,
d
arrow to Feeder
�„
Farrow to Finish
x ; a R� 4 r�i i Fi—'- f T' M E n
iDt�� 1/i.+grC[ip i�i�F;
❑ Gilts
'� ,
1
p�
Boars
,'-
�+r �y� �Iirl f
1 T�
1E Jt t ( f, �#1 ott l SSL P1.
�� ,E �' t � =�E IE " tE
f
�a93
Nutnber of Ligii; ns !1 J], E
=' E �E �tj=
❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area S rav Field Area
E P
dingPands'lrSohd,Traps " rki
Yie'u ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes `
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2'No
Structure 6
Identifier: r
Freeboard (inches): [�
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: �.— Date of Inspection Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
, re
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes !.a "'0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No'
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refe*l to uestion ) .-Expialn,any YES nswers and/orany recommendations or an yoth r comments. . ,.
� ��
gUse rdrawinga of faciiitbetter explain s�ituatians. {use addttidnal pagesa" s n ces r��y) �
�:. ❑Field Couv ❑Final Notes
. .. � ; „ . ;� ,�
Reviewer/inspector Name { &:o
Reviewerlinspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

I"
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: �
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
©Permitted 0 Certified [3Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: . j;11 e4t-- `7 Z County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ` iG Longitude ' ` 0 Gf
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca aci ' Population Poultry Ca aci Pa`ulation°F Cattle Ca ki ' Po ulatidn
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy `
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
........
❑ Farrow to Wean i
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars f' Total SSL' W
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
ti .ter ,
Holding=Ponds ISolid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes
❑ Yes P <1
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �Il o
El Yes Vo
-
❑ Yes
ElYes No
Structure 6
Continued

3
Facility Number: tl Z p Date of Inspection Z a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A,Pplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type I ^'� �� 7 �}' �r ✓ 4 / �_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes LdNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 17 No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes No
El Yes �
❑ Yes [2 o
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes ❑ No _
❑ Yes e�? <0
❑ Yes
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available.
WUP, design,
❑ Yes
V:t
(ic/ checklists, maps, etc.)
o
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
pxo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
o
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
o
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
El Yes
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
ElYes24.
;0'No23.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
0
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Co nmi:ntsYrefer'to auesti6n #}.',';Explain anv YE5.answers andl." a. '. i ' ` r "�
or�anv recommendations or an�'a"ther,,:ccimments.;....
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ReviewertInspector Signature:
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date: % 2 2 /
05103101 Continued

Type of Vlslt ,/C� Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other Z ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: L Time:10 J
�
Not Operational 0 Below T reshold
Permitted 1cer+tified O Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: u "�J 7� County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address: �r- (!,+ TL1Ly [ v`�^�Sd 1'u-- ZZ 378
Facility Contact:Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: I Integrator: 4
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
�S$
oslwIne ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 0• �� ���
Design Current
Swine ! enonir. Pnnnlelinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ F ow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
OD O
XTD
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultr capacity Population Cattle Ca acl Po rile#ion
❑ Layer I 1 1110 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 11 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I - - I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area
❑ No Liauid Waste Manaeement Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste roftcli2a &I[eatment
4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: h
r
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes / No
❑ Yes Y o
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes rNo
❑ Yes E�/No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: Z - f Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waite Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over appplica ion? f ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN [IHydraulic Overload
12. Crop type r. J'l .D .f►AIX_ ) I SIN
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those d6signated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management,Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) V/ �y e
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ iff4on, freeboard, vShhe
ralysis & soti sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25• Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
r
❑ Yes _ONo
Cl Yes ,0<,
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes [2No
❑ Yes j No
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes,'eNo
❑ Yes P190
❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes ON,
❑ Yesfo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes t No
i
❑ Yes ;2rNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes eNo
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comiments"('refer to''question #j rEzpiain any YESkanswers andlar:any recommend tions,or anyo't r comments `
aLfsedrawings of'facility'to better explain situations: (use additional pages as `necessary) ;
field Copy El Final Notes
f x°� � ; i
BLtR �S �� .G�.lil�ati
Reviewer/Inspector Name , " _ �.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: o's-
05103101 V Continued

Facility plumber: L6-1
—
Date of Inspection I /2t71��j
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes jPNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes
El Yes
Addition al°Comments and/or Urimings:
O5103101

Type of Visit I>Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit G4 outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:b / 'Time:
Facility Number / O
� Not Operational O Below Threshold
GI(ermitted [3 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ......... f rr .....A...f 3................................................................................... County: lir°!r
.........................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ..3�.... .....� .............. Phone No:... 9Lc7.l..�r9% � �v......................................
Facility Contact: ............... Title: ................................................................
� `Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: .................................................`..................................................................... .......... ,�L,4 �...(".C......................................... � G1......
Onsite Rcpresentative:.. ; {� lN�.�4.�P Integrator: rator• 5.. °...............................:v.................
Certified Operator:.....``....... ..... �..................... Operator Certification Number:..,Z,d3,t(/, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
....... ..........
Location of Farm:
["wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ©4 �6L Longitude �• �4 /0
gn
Cana Ponulatiian r?' Caaacity Po''nulation' x Des
5iwlne Poulfi Cattle Cabi
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Lopd
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy. - -
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Toltal SSLW C
. -
Nuiinber;'ofELagoons f [ ] Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
HoldingPonds`I Solid+Traps` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. II'discharge. is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:I.- ..................... .................................... ................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes CINo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E;VNo
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure 6
.................................................................
Continued on back

Facility Number: t z-,— (,a Date of Inspection L o Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does thefacility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 1 ,l
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, free oard, wa Jddd/la`tjalyosis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
O:.�R•YiQia�itjgs off• d�ft;�encies �r. pgter�-d�tcitig �hisa; �:Y:o� ;w�i�->�eei<iye �ti �lu��er • .
:. ctirresDoricience: a�aut this visit: ..:::::.:....::....:..::...::....
Use drawingsttn f,h,? t
/' ` '�; rl�y►+�w_. „ors 7 ►r �'�
� I �
❑ Yes Ey�o
❑ Yes 9/No
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes Gllo
❑ Yes ILdtvo
❑ Yes (Ilo
❑ Yes EEO
❑ Yes Ml� o
❑ Yes Ko
❑ Yes Ulry0
❑ Yes GYNo
04eYefs ❑ No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes 10
❑ YesCNo
❑ Yes Lytvo
❑ Yes �LYNo
❑ Yes [�'No
❑ Yes 2No
❑ YesIo
❑ Yes
[I Y
es
Yes
`i
Reviewer/Inspector Name
p , v•K!iJ�-) r V .. r %.11� - � _<<.< �: e^.€V i'Pt e.{� •,,, .n !id €z ...ti ,.i.�v `. s�V• r#�'i. ,a, a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z i s/]pp

Facility Number: 2-- In I Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?�
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighbonng vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes EkKo
❑ Yes Vo
❑ Yes 1140
❑ Yes UINo
❑ Yes �zo'
❑ Yes:/0
❑ Yes
-- ,S�I�-e.. � v,,rr� r�� `f� ..� ate..... � �•�,,�,r .
5100

IvisiOn of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation l�
s i.•'! • � � I � Q Ather Agency �' I ! 3 '
(Type of Visit _Q'Compj ante Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit oRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
t)ate of 'Visit:
/i eU Time: a t Printed on: 7/21/2000
FIli Number
ar
Q Not Operational
Q Below Threshold
ermitted [3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified
❑ Registered
Date Last Operated
or Above Threshold: ............... .. ...
�l p �''irs �If 1? K" � � 1....
FarmName: ..................................................................................................................'...................................................
County:
�y�T��!Fy�
OwnerName:
Phone No:.q..Q....I......Z.........,..":.....%.................................
..........I .....................................................................................
�d"
FacilityContact: ........................... ... .......................
Title:.......................................
................
Phone No:...................................................
,Mailing Address: #Vs.....1�..Q.%�......�.,i�.�..........��rr&O.... �.�---...........
.....................................................................................
..........................
Onsite Representative: ....................................................................................................
Integrator:...3
.....
Certified Operator:,,,,, S � '
Operator Certification Number: ................
Location of Farm:
..........
❑ Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle ❑Horse Latitude
�......
Longitude �• ®�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swin Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Z,WgTzrn to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
it Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer EEEI JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farr o Wean
P,rairrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSL W ,
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impack5
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ohscrved, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. li'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Struct e `, Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ..............Z........
❑ Yes _1Vo
❑ am' Yes l"�
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes � �0�'
❑ Yes ;Zo�
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Frechoard (inches): i
5100 6, tq, l 1
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type 15CI A-+u. A . 5�.. yr ,rf r R✓f
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time,of design? .
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'Vc� yipli ><tQnjs'o tl fc�encies vv�re �Qte�1 iltit itr�g h#s:v�s�t} Yoh wi....y.... hi 6r; • •
• ctirresporicierrce: a�otiti this visit. • •
4 -aJ
0w {'r L%0 ) 9�q '(
❑ Yes No
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes r - -
❑ Yes P_N�O-
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Eh(O
❑ Yes <fTN—o
❑ Yes P-Ko
❑ Yes ..��No,
Ko
El Yes
❑ Yes LdN0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0440
❑ Yes Id�o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes UKO
❑ Yes Ib
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes NN
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
eVA.9/ySiS ,
Ia,,-4..>-f

Facility lumber: — Date of Inspection //�j%/1M Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor ISSUES
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge gt/or below es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes o
es ❑ No
Additional.Comments and/orDrawings:
•
5100

IV ,..,
Div►s►o Sort and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection`
Conscrvat►on O eration Review
,0'D to of.Soil and Water p
Division of Water" -Quality '- Compliance Inspection
[];Other Agency Qperation,Review.Lai
i
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u ► of DSNVC review 0 Other.
�I Number Mae of Inspeclion
Tillie of lw:pection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�rclmittcd J ] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O per:►tional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: f rO......01.,-s.....*.......!...0................................................................ Count .4,
.. .....'... .%...................................................
Owner Name:. G�%f-!%� ivxi Phone No: . . �....'~.,. �'.. ..,� t!i. ?............................
1 t
Facility Contact: D�.�a.. ..�9/ / ! %. .... ..., ............. Title :..................................n..1........................... Phone No....................................................
7-2
MailingAddress: 1..:..����... W..7 ....... ��1.�✓..��G...�...0-;..1r..d........................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative:. �................................. Integrator: ... O..A,,rGrtf.....................................................
Certified Operator:...... -fin (/t%� � �` d Operator CertifWation Number :..........................................
.........................I......................
Location of Farm: p b
....................................................................................................................................................................................I....................
.........................................................................................................................................................................I.................. ...
Latitude �' �� �•� Lougitude
Design ' Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
arrow. to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface [)rains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste fiManagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (I I' yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes 2 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
1). If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & "Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 7No
El Yes
❑ Yes Pr IN41,
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structurc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (�
Freeboard(inches): ...., 1 `+r...!.................................................................................................................................................................................................
...
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility l9bmber: 7 L l Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence ofover application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type � 77q�/..........
.7................................................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving; crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ,r G' Lj t�7►�.,
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklis(s, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did RevipWer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on -site representative?
24. D facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
No.vililations'or: de ciencit�s'were' noted: during:tliis'visit. * Y•ou wviIfret eive niY Mrtiie'r
:•eorresptiridence;about;tk�isvisit.:•;•;•;•;�;•;•;•.•;•;•;•;•.•,•.•; ; ; ; ; ..•.•;•.•.•.-.•...........
2�
❑ Yes a<
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes Calr o
❑ Yes
..........................
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;1No�
❑ Yes 211O
❑ Yes 1=J rO
❑ Yes No
ElYes No
❑ Yes No
ElYes � o
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Comments`(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommend6tions or any, other,comen mts
ace sty. to ,ett.er explain situations. use additional pages as necessary); i se rawrn s'a
,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
't,4
Date:
1 /6/99

f
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number t/L a
Farm Name: roti n
On -Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: 2r7.✓ e-
Date of site visit:._
Date of most recent WUP::�25ZT�_
Revised January 22, 1999
FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure
Part 11 eligibility itemof
F9 F2 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annua! farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -nose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination'
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
bufferlsetback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.
\\

Revised January 22, 1999
Facility Number 4/Z- -IeD
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
t 3
7,3
z• �r
17
b
.Z
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
x DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
r
Routine O C'onwlaint O 1 ollnNv-up of t)1N'O inspection O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: M Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of nspection
Time ttf inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction Ot' luturs
(ex.1.2; for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or itaspection i,inclutles tnivel and processing}
[3 \ttt O aerrttional Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
t
4 1 �} �Ililnt\" �� �'��..x...............
Farm larnc:.........�r..A..ttil.!�'.........f*'�.....C.f.�..t,S,?.i..ta.�?...T...L..�............ '
Owner Name :..... 4..co. ,4........V..f.x.:rl........................•.........•.......................•......•... Phone \rt; I,14.� . `�. ?... 1. .4,1....,................................
Facility Contact: � Title I1G C........I............................ . r' ............................ ...........
iltrtiling :Iddress:.....,..,.. x.....!„••...(...........i/�,1.�di'�.lAi...!•(. `!.t......•.a..•.A.:..�r•..•.......••............................................... ................
Onsite Representalive:,,..,.QsM................................................................................ Integrator:....................
I S a r...... !� h `� e C,t.., p 0 3 3 �..........
Certified Operator: :....... ..... . ,l.•.. ..... ................. Operator C'crtification ?�urnbcr ._.• _. ,•.
Location of Farm:
.��-�..�...•..��•, �i.�,..� rr,�,n•,•,•,•��....••••.,�......•....•••...•...•....,••,•••'Ir••.r••,r•••,•'•••••••,�••...••r•�....I.�i.....�.i..�.�...............��...�.•`�.•tti••r•••.rr.•...•••....•r••r,,.,r••.r•,•r•,•••....
VCR • ••• ••
Latitude �� E�LJi �� cc Longitude ��• nr � �:�
Type of Operation
Swine -
Design Current ' Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Nnn-Dairy
'0
0
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains PresentJ10 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes 12:10
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes [ No
Diecharoe originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. It'dischar•.ae is oN orved, was the conveyance titan -made'?• ❑Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Surlace Water'? (Ifyes, notify D\VQ1 ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, lfdisfharoc is observed. what is the estttnated How to Ealfmin?
d. Does. discharge bviiass a la-oon system'? tlf yes, notify D\VQ} �ja � ❑Yes �❑, No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? El Yes 11 �o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �ZNo
5. Does any part of the waste nianagetnent system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes [; No
ntai ntenance/improve ment'!
4/30/97 Continued on hack

• Facility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �'o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes GTNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes p No
Structures. (Lagoons and/or Holding fonds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes r No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes R o
IL Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 13 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes EdNo
Ri tc_application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes OKO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.
16.
17.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ Y s
[f do
IJ Na
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
I9.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Y
d'o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ Zo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
For Cgrtilied Facilities_Onlr
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Asses.srneia Unit 4/30/97 %

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
e��
1DEEHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 26, 1996
Mr. Scott Gurkin
Browns of Carolina
303 East College Street
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Browns of Carolina Farm # 19
Facility # 42-10 SR 1101
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Gurkin:
On August 7, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. The
vegetation on the adjacent spray fields was much improved from the
previous years site inspection, and as a result the facility was
found to be in compliance with the State's animal nondischarge
rules.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers, The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, i
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

Browns of Carolina # 19
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Responsible Charge". It shall be the responsibility
of this individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the
animal waste management system and to have control over waste
application activities. Currently classes are being held for
operators of swine facilities and training is being developed
specifically to address dairy and liquid poultry operations. For
more information please call either your local Soil and Water
Conservation District or Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
c h �,,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District (Halifax)
Steve Bennett -Regional Coordinator, DSWC
RRO File Copy

Facility Number: L/ Z _ / D
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 3 " 7 ` 9Z _
Time: 013 a
Farm Name: 3raX-17s 0 �� G<?rJl� �—�3/ �_ _ County:
Owner Name: S� f -- �2ccr /G � _ _ Phone No: � �� — yn z
On Site Representative: -----Integrator: L _1'Uw,75
Mailing Address: aZ a_0 Y Z 7 -3
Physical Address/Location:
Latitude: 1 I Lon 'tude: 1 1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Typ �of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
O'Sow ?2 0 ❑ Layer El Dairy
❑-Nursery 5 v o o 0 Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder
Othe:Ly a of Livestock. v Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: ��(include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Fact i ,�i�pgtion:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot f 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑
No
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑
No E
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No
❑ Man-made C? Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No ❑
Z ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes
No
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:_why O -+: G -,ems s _ Acreage: 4eo1*Cgy'•-
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes D
No
Is a well Iocated within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
;,l
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ N
AOI » January 17,1996

1
%� Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Does record keeping need improvement?
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site?
Yes Or"' No 0
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No O
Yes ET- No ❑
Explain any Yes answers
%I� �s5 ► s S-1111 S��rs�S
o?��T.
�� Sc7s,,� 'P__/A`� T , L��110r,
ff�4 c� Z FrccL a�a_�-d .
Signature Date. i .- ?- 9 6
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations_
AOI -- January 17,1996

IUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO RRO P.02/02
M•
Site Requires Immediate A*tcn6nn- V
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT'
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 ' , 1995
"7'7 3 f -z' Time: I / J-
Farm Name/Owner:, & nw ✓S a /- e'll, Z /f�� 11�/ / L _
Mailing Address: J a ,3 E ns t Go110r- S4, . P-0: o ff o x y 7 r9�s.�<✓ s.� r 2 a' S' �'
County: /`76'9 / (' A yIntegrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 310 - 793 -
Physical Address/Location. S !� h`4 S 2 %� ��7u^ c�' v+� .._ �Lc,.,�
4
Type of Operation- Swint Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �c: SL��r�_ Number of Animals on Site: Tr).-� �-IL�
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM_ Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: O`(' l Longitude: 3 D -' / Z" Elevation. __-__meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or N& Actual Freeboard: —L-yt. Inches {41
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or t�i Was any erosion observed? YY or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No P Is the cover crop adequate? Yes of
Crops) being utilized: ViEtZ\,, S,''.,t c _ r- e ci, e / Ll
r
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? ,Jcs or No
.hc animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strcam? Yes oris(:))
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 poet of a liSGS Map Blue Line'? Yes 007
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or uther
sirni;ar man-made de-rices? <&or No If Yts. Please Explain..B ! ��
'k ws tric +:tc:ility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes oi6nlanure, Land applicd.
s-gray irrigaied on specific acreage with cover crop}? Yes or No p d : d 'i 4i%e
Additional Comments:
0--n '1 q a/
W it b J ��, a �� cl -r A-�' )9 7 veer _..r/ey vc� 44'�o�/,y
r Jr�ii*,L�, .� Lv YJ rl [ 0-- 0
n T o _ +� zvi J T /e- Cr c/ lie r +
C. \_3,.: Si arLue
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
74 L L i'n
TOTAL

r]
OF Ln" i i UIN") DnMj,4�ri - WU r df • 71 Z7 - 1 1-J-QU'40
Jul LV 7J 11 - )" I 1L1 1Cl
Site Requires Immediate Attention
SITE VISITA IION RECO D
DATE:� �� 1995
/ /y
Owner: Farris Name:
County: r'� -
Agent Visiting Site: ram• C�� Prone: '-? $e8l
Operator: Phone: , � - 5KZ- e ?-
On Site Representative: : ;. r�� ��r� Phone:
Facility Number: y2 / O
Physical Address:
Mailing Address:
Type of Operation
Design Capaciry:
Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Latitude: 2 7 0 7O /O
Type of Inspection: Ground
Number of Animals on Site: C)
Longitude.G v_
Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste lagoon have suffleient f cboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately i Foot+? inches) Yes o Actual Freaboard: 1 � Feet O Inches
For faeilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' frceboard under the
continents section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Ycs 0& Was there erasion of the dam?: Yes t�0
Is adequate land avilable for land application? Yes or No is the cover crop adequate? Yes 0(i ;'J
JIJ rrp..rf �^'
Fax to [phone]
Signal of Agent

Site Requires Immediate Attention
Facility Number: _ Ll 2 - I b
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: — 7 ," q , 1995
Owner: % ! 2Farm Name,
�,1 .S.0 / 4 U
County:
Agent Visiting Site; - a 6%�1 % � . �'.�'� Phone: .S
Operator. Phone:
On Site Representative: r Phone:
Physical Address:
Mailing Address:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓
Design Capacity:
Latitude: 70
Type of Inspection: Ground
Poultry Cattle
Number of Animals on Site: 2 -
Longitude• •?C o
Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient f eeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour starm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes o Nor Actual Freeboard: Feet D Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o& Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes d&D
Is adequate land av Hable for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes o
Additional Comments: , a,,-e- r ♦ / moo.— s^a �Tr
01401 — 5 r v-40.a e f ev"4 .G.— .
Fax to [phone] ' Signab4 of Agent

NUH I H GAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

� �y .
- � ..7 ..
i
�;= � �• _-
f''r, � }'?- r
�ai�n_ - .. _ _ �-
"ems
ie,. '-..
�.

DIVISION' (IF AVA'fER 0111A1.ITY
- 1'hnuis[n I,ahnralmy Hryn,rt! 1x'alrr t)natkty
r r
w SAMPLE'l YPE
('()IIN tY HALIFAX
E'KIVKIII"
HI('F:Ft B,151N :
AMBIEN-I- OA
❑ STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
� n
14FTOR1.10 RRO RvAirni ( ltire AN
jlry 1
r C COMPLIANCE S l-IIAIN0FCUSIc717Y
5 2�0 ❑
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUEiNU
�Jj
Other 1.t} i
FMFRGFNCY VISIFID
FS'I'UARY
(:OI,LF;('I ORES) HUNT
J
---
E%i mated It011 Range: ( .. - - — -- -" •— Station I.oratian: BROWNS FARIA
Seed: Uhlnrinalyd; Hnnxr4s:
Stallan M Daee Begin 1yy7mmlddl Dale Fnd ( slmmldd) Time Begin l imr End Depth - WN1, pR, UB\I Value Type- A. H, 1. Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
SPRAY FIELD SOURCE 20021217 1050
BOD 310 200 G! m /L
COO I li , 340 m L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Colifurm: MF Fecal 31616 330000 /100m1
Colifurm: MF'rotal 31504 /100m1
Colifurm: lubc Fecai 31615 - / 100ml
Colifurm: Fecal SLrep 31673 1100m1
Residue: Total 500 m L
Volatile 505 m&IL
Fixed 510 m L
RvsidUC; Sus ,ended 530 m /L
Volatile 535 m /L
Fixed 540 m /L
pit 403 units
Acidity to pli4.5436 m /L
Acidity to pli 9.3 435 m /L
Alkalinity to 2119-3 415 nn /1,
Alkalinity to pi14.5410 m /L
TOC 680 m /L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colirsrrm Total Tube "/ 100 mis
C011ftl EN I S :
Chloride 940 m I.
Chi a: l ri 32217 upVL
Chi a: Corr 32209 u /L -
Pheo h sin a 32213 u /L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (Ell) 83 11= C.U.
Color. pH 7-6 82 C.U.
Cyan 720 . m /L
Fluoride951 m 1L
Formaldehyde 71880 rn /L
Gicax and Oils 536 m •/1.
llardness 'Fotal9W m /L
S •cifrc Cond. 95 u,nhos/cm2
hH4AS 38260 n, g/l.
11hcnols32730 u /I -
Sulfate 945 rt, /l.
Sulfide 745 In/l.
Boson
Tannin & Li in u /L
l lexavalem Chromium u /L
Bieatbonate m /L
Ufttiatt Rig/ 1.
t
NJU as N 610 X2 m /L
I KN an N 625 X2 m /L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/ L
X
P: Total as P 665 X2 m L
1104 as P 70507 nt L
P: Dissolved as P 666 m L
K-Potassium m /L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 tt /L
Cr-ChmrniumcTotal 1034 u /L
Cu- Copper 1042 u /L
Ni-Nickcl1067 u /L
Pb- Lead 1051 u /L
Zn- Zinc 1092 u /L
IV -Vanadium u /L
A-Silvci 1077 u L
Ai -Aluminum 1105 u L
Be - Br Ilium1012 u /L
Ca- Calcium 916 m /L
Co -Cobalt 1037 u /L
Fe- Iron 1045 u /L
Li -Lithium 1132 u /L
Mg- maesium927 m /L
Mn-Man nese 1055 u /L
Na- Sodium 929 m /L
Arsenic:Total 1002 u L
Se -Selenium 1147 uSIL
Hg- Mercury 71900 u L
Ba Barium u L
Organochlurinc Pesticides
Organuphosphorus Pesticides
Acid I1crbicides
Basc/Neutral&Acid Extractable Os inics
IPiI Range
Purguable Or nits (VOA bo01c rc 'd)
'FPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Ph to lanklon

C�p.; e+c--u yoy
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY HELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY
PRIORITY SAMPI.F TYPE
� 4i1�� �-�
R1VF•,R BASIN
❑ Ah1111LNT ❑ STREAM ❑ I:FFLU T
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRtl� WaRO WiRO WSRO TS
AT QM
COAIP!_IANCE ❑ LAKE I ,UE
Other
Shipped by: Bus. Courier to Other v
- ❑ EPAERGENCY ❑ FSTUARY
COLLECTOR S1:
Estimated 130D Range: 0-5l5-25 5- e40-130 or 100 plus STAl1ON UWAi IS_ I- AaPA Z
Seed: Yes ❑ No P4_ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No
REMARKS:
F_ 1 .1, flew ()NI V
Lab Number:
Date Rece'vcd: Time
Rec'd b From: Bus -courier- and De
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Station H Dalc Ile gin (yylmn+dd) Tinte Begin hate litd rime End Depth DM DE3 DBM Value Type 7011sposite
Sample Type
tZ ! (�' $ A 11 L S B C GNXX
1
XIBOD53110
nrg/L
2
COD High 340 mg/L
3
COD Low 335 mg/L
4
Colil"orm: MF Fecal31616 flound
5
Cout'orm: hiFTotal 31504 110Und
6
Colifonn: Tube Fecal31615 !1(10ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strtp 31673 1100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 rng/L
9
Volatile 505 mg/L
10
Fixed 510 mglL
11
Residue: Suspended 53U rng/I.
12
Volatile 535 mg/L
13
Fixed 540 mg/L
14
pit 403 units
15
Acidity to pil 4.5 436 mglL
16
Acidity to p1l 8.3 435 mg/L
17
Alkalinity to pit 8.3 415 tng/l.
Is
Alkalinity totill 4.541U Ing/l.
19
TOC 680 twit.
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mgeL
Chi a 70953 pgll.
Color: True RQ Pt -Co
Color:tpll ) 83 ADhl1
Color:pl17.6 92 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mgll.
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Fornuldehydc 71880 mgll-
(ifeace and oils 556 lowt.
I iardlless Iola190) mg/l.
Specific Cond. 95
NIBAS 38260 ntglL
Phenols 32730 µrr/L
Sulfate 945 mgel.
Sutlide 745 mg/L
Nlll as N 610 mglL
rKN as N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 63Q mg/L
P: Total as 1' 665 mg/L
V4 as P 665 mg/L
': Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
d-Cadmium 1021 pg/L
Cr-Clromittrn:Tntnl 1034 pglL
'WCopper 1042 µgeL
i-Nickel io(17 pg/L
Pb-Lead 1051 pglL
Zn-Z.irte 1092 µg/L
AS-Siltvt 1077 µgeL
Al -Aluminum 1105 pglL
ie-Beryllium 1012 pgeL
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/L
Co-C-uball 1037 pgll,
Fc-Iron IIFl5 µgel
i-Lithium 1132 µg1L
1g-Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 µg/L
a -Sodium 929 mg/L
rscnictTolal1002 - Itg/L
Sclenium 1147
Ig-Mercury 71900 µ C/L
lrgao0cld0rinc Pesticides '
1rgalWpllnsphortl5 Pesticides '
cid Ilerbieides
SasclNetaral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
urgcabie Organics (VOA bonle req'd)
'hytoplanklon
Lnh Use (h11v
I'ctn teraturc on arrival:
samplingsamplifig Point %
C'urduciamv at 25-C
WBter 1'en raltrc "C
).U. mJL
11
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Te ratiae'C
Ill 8.3 1114.5
Ill 4.5 pit 8.3
2
J4
U
3oa
400
2244 431
2243 L7242
20
Salinity '.4o
Precipitation (inldayl
Cloud Cuter %
Wind Direction (Dcg)
Srreant HOW Severity
Irtobidily Severiry
Mind Velocity lean Strea m Depth I1,
164
Stream Width It.
80
45
12
36
351
350
35
4

NC DENRIDWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Report to: RD Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number. - 1 v 6 7 '1y Sample ID:
Station Location: IcrttN 's _l= A-9-,Y) County: I-l-PL t >;�_,c Region:
r Sample Type: t_.00t7 ' Priority: t; 1= o (__ Collector:
Date collected: is, / 1'7 / 0 Date received: I -z- / i ) I r~ -2- Date analyzed: I 1
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ METALS
NUT ❑ MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldshcet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldshcet
Cl Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
�k Sample not chemically preserved properly
pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
M
Other (specify):
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
❑ SVOA
❑ Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure - no reportable results
Cl Analyst error - no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ Internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
Cl Elevated detection limits due to:
❑ Insufficient sample volume
Comments:
Sc� is w� c�.-� c� .. �_ Ci'-
T
Corrective Action:
Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: L4�JLII 0 Date: JQ
Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact-pers-&h and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
❑ Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)> Yes No
Person Contacted: T z t1 Date: a 113� 1_12
Form completed by: IilcTt5L L eV- rA-,TA,t t Date: 1 2 /17 / L;-
ad Chemist Re vi w t ual):
B10CREM ❑ PEST Q SVOA
,I METALS ❑ VOA
Branch }lead Review (initial):
QA/QC Review (initi Logged into database by (initial):
QASFo,m�SLaban,ary�SAR 1012310i dbs

ti
Amami
January 22, 2003
Mr. Kenneth Schuster `ti
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
RE: Notice of Violation, Intent to Enforce, COC AWS420010
Brown's of Carolina Farm 52, Halifax County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
We are in receipt of a Notice of Violation (NOV) for Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 52,
operated by Brown's of Carolina, Virginia Division. The NOV details events occurring on
December 16, 2002. The NOV indicates that a site inspection by Mr. Buster Towell, of the
Raleigh Regional Office, "led to the discovery of an illegal discharge of animal waste from the
subject facility which flowed into surface waters of the State."
While we do not dispute that lagoon effluent did in fact leave the application field at this
location, we do not believe that this constitutes a discharge to waters of the state. The wastewater
flowed into a drainage ditch and infiltrated into a low area in the woods before reaching the pond.
The pond is indeed hydraulically connected to the USGS "blue line" stream known as Cow Haul
Swamp; however, no effluent reached either the pond or this swamp. As flow of the effluent
stopped before reaching these features, it can be reasonably assumed that no adverse downstream
water quality impact occurred as a result of this incident. Remediation efforts were also
conducted at this location to remove lagoon effluent that had reached the woods. These efforts
ensured that flow would not continue into the pond if accelerated by rainfall. For these reasons,
we feel that no enforcement action is appropriate in this case.
The NOV also states violation of General Permit Condition 11.2., which states that a
vegetative cover shall be maintained on all application fields. A small grain crop was indeed
interseeded into these pastures in the fall of 2001, and while extremely cold conditions this winter
have made it challenging to attain a strong stand, nitrogen uptake will still occur. It appears that
the runoff conditions were exacerbated more by the moisture levels in the soil than by the grain
stand.
The employees responsible for land application activities on this site have been
disciplined for the lack of proper oversight exhibited in this situation. This includes the
termination of employment of Ronald Vincent. Brown's of Carolina considers the responsibility
of avoiding permit violations a condition of employment with the company, and takes necessary
action to see that incidents such as this do not occur in the future.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
434 EAST MAIN STREET - P.O. BOX 1240 - WAVERLY, VA 23890 - PHONE [phone]
VIRGINIA DIVISION

We appreciate the opportunity to work with the DWQ in effectively resolving this issue,
and once again state that no enforcement action is warranted in this situation due to the fact that
all effluent runoff was retained on Smithfield-Carroll's property and did not reach USGS "blue
line" surface waters.
Please contact me at [phone] if you require any further information.
Sincerely,
Neil Zahradka
Manager of Farming and Environmental Affairs
cc: Mr. Jack Keane, Brown's of Carolina, Virginia Division
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
Mr. Don Butler, Murphy -Brawn, LLC
Ms. Kelley Kline, Esq., Smithfield Foods, Inc.

DIVISION OF WA•F'ER QUALITY
,�'t
•'.
Chrndstr.� I.ahuworl liryorrr ! tVatrr Qnallt.
El 511ia BE
Y\
t-t
C[)IINT'Y' 11AI.IFAX
RIVERIIASIN:
1'Ii10KlI_Y
� AMBIENT� QA
❑ STREAM
`� EFFLUEI
S -
Rf;l.01tTT[1 : RRO RcginnalOfLcc
a COMPLIANCE CIIAINOFCUSTODY
G LAKE
Q']NFLUZNI'
Other
EMERGENCY VISH 11)
ES'E-UARY
[Y IL1.1:Cf[IRISI : JlIUNT
Lab Number
2W8719
Bate Received :
12/ 1712002
Time Received :
2:25 PM
Received By
11MW
L
1�1316
Data Released
Alt
Date Reported:
1 /10/2003
h:s[lmsrcd Will 7sn>:r•, Station i!Kstinn; BROWNS FARM
Srrd: 1'h for In atrd: Itrnu rks:
Slat too 11 Datr Iirgln la.Immlddi Usle End gpLllnuddl 7 imr Begin -I Imr Find Ilrpth - DNI, IIEf, 111151 ".WI
'slnr T j pr- A, 11, 1- l'ompositti I', S. B Namptr'1'ppe
W I,ILANUS 20021217 RYES
r
13011310 280 G1 m /L
CUD Ili h 340 m /L
COD Low 335 m /L
x
Coliform: Nil -'Fecal 31616 620000 83 11(nnl
Coliform: MF Total 31304 / I Win]
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 / IOU"
Coliform; Fecal Sj�ep 31673 /l0oml
Residue: Total 500 m /L
Volatile 305 m L
Fixcd 510 m /L
Residue: Suspt nded 530 m /l.
Volatile 535 m /L
Fixcd 540 m /L
11 403 units
Addit In 11 4.5 436 m /l,
Aridity to PH8.3435 rn /L
Alkalinity to ptl 9.3 415 m L
Alkalinity to p1l 4.5 410 m L
TOC 680 rtt /L
I utbijity 76 NTU
Coliform'TotaI Tube '/l00 mis
['ll\fA1FNl"S ;
Chloride940 m /L
Chi a:"] ri 32217 v /L
Chi a: Cart 322U9 u /L
Pheo h ytin a 32213 u /L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: ( l l) 83 pll= C.U.
Color: Of 7.6 82 c,a
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m /L
Formaldehyde 71990 m /L
Grease and Oils 556 m /L
Ilardnos Tatal900 nr /L
Specific Cunt]. 95 umhtn/cm1
MBAS38260 mg/ L
Phenols 32730 u /1.
Sulfate 945 m /L
Sulfide 745 rtr /L
Boron
Tannin & Li in u /L
Hexavaleni Chromium u /L
Bicarbonate m /L
Carbonate m /L
0
X
010asN610 280 m /L
X
'1 KN an N 625 290 m L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 L
X
P: Total as P 665 39 m&IL
PO4 as P 70507 m / L
P: Dissolved as P666 to 'i
K-Polassium m /L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 u /L
Cr-Chtomium:Total1034 u L
Co- S102peT 1042 u /L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Ph- Lcad 1051 u /L
Zn- Zinc 1092 u /L
V-Vanadium u /L
A -Silver 1077 u /L
Al- Aluminum 1105 u /L
Be- Belyllium 1012 u L
Ca- Calcium 916 L
Co -Cobalt 1037 u /L
Fc- Iron 1045 u /L
Li -Lithium H31 ug/L
Mg- Maetsium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 /L
Arsenic:Tota11002 u /L
Se -Selenium 1147 u /L
H . Mercury 71900 u L
Ba Barium u L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphatus Pesticides
Acid Ilerbicides
Basc/Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Pu able Organics(VOA botde re 'd)
TPH Gasoline PanVe
TPH/BTEX Gawline RanjE
Phytoplankton

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM 1) For Lab Use ONLY
I+ A)/
COUNTY � A L,
1 �^ r
R
'Rl 1
SAMt'LR TYPE
RIVER BASIN
❑ AhltilfNT
❑ STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FROM RRO aRO WiRO WSRO TS
I
AT BM
�i✓ COA4PLIANCE
❑ LAK£
❑ IN
Olhcr
Shipped by: Bus. Courier, raft Cher
❑ EMERGENCY
❑ reTUARY
Lab Number:
Date Rece-v d• Time: 5knd,�
Rec'd b From: Bus -Courier
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
` DATE REPORTED:
COLLECFOR(S): r rJ t ,
Estimated DOD Range: 0-515-23125-665140-130 or 100 plus 5'rA I70_ N LUCA I ION: F] (r� ] S F019—/--'s
Sced: Yes ❑ No19L Chiorinaied: Yes ❑ No
Rli61ARKS:
Station p _ Date Itcgin (yy/mnUdd) Time Ilcgin Time Find l)eplh DAI Dl1 U11M Value Type Composite Sample Tyre
I)i'"T L A .S C) _S UL 1 L 1 n: `t S A.jDalcluki
�- Z-1. [-1— - q {� A 1 I L T S B C GNXX
1
13005 310 utglL
2
CUD High 340 mg1L
3
C013 Low 335 mgll.
4
Coliform: MF 1'ecal 31616 1100ail
5
Colifosrrc MFTotal 31504 /IIXhn1
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 AW1111
7
Coliform: Fecal Sucp 31673 /100mi
8
Residue: Total 300 mg/L
9
Volatile 505 meL
10
Fixed 510 mg/L
I I
Residue: Suspcmlcd 530 rnglL
12
Volatile 535 ntg/L
13
Fixed 540 mgrL
14
pit 403 units
15
Acidity to pit 4.5 436 mg/L
16
Acidity to pll 8.3 435 mg/L
17
Alkalinity to p118.3 415 mg/L
18
Alkalinity to pit 4.5 410 ntg/I.
19
I0C 680 mgrL
20
'I tvhidity 76 N-111
Chloride 940 111g/L
Cld a 70953 µ fill.
Color. True 80 Pt -Co
olor:(Pll ) 83 ADMI
Color:pI17.6 82 ADM I
Cyanide 720 nrg/L
Fluoride 951 mg1L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease aril0its 55f. mg/L
llardnesslotal900 mg/L
Specific Conti 93
MBAS 38260 nrg/L
Phenols 32730 µg/L
Salflre 945 mglt.
Sulfide 745 ntg1L
NI13 as N 610 mg/L
rKN as N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Tidal as 1' 665 mg1L
104 as 1' 665 mg)L
Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
d-Cadmium t027 pCIL
Cs -Chromium jotal 1034 µg/L
u-Copper 1042 µ fill.
i-Nickcl 1067 It C/L
E"b-Lead WS1 pg/L
Zn-Zinc 1092 µgfL
\g-Silver 1077 ftg/L
M-Aluminum 1105 pg/L
se-llcrylliunr 1012 pgli-
Ca-Calcium 916 mg/L
Co-Cohalt I037 pg/L
Fc-Iran 1045 µCA.
-i-Lithium 1132 µg1L
1g-Magnesium 927 mg)L
Mn-Manganese 1055 µg/L
a -Sodium 929 mg/L
rsenic:Tutal 1002 pg1L
c-Selenium 1147 µg/L
IS -Mercury 71900 µg/L
lrgarwchlorine Pesticides
rganophosphonts Pessicides
cid Ilerbicidcs
J
lasemcutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
urgcable Organics (VOA bottle req'd)
'hytuplanktun
Lab Ilse Oulu
Trio craturc on anival:
Sam lin Poim %
Conductance at 25"C:
water Trnr )crature'C
).O. niWL
11
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Tent erature'C
1113.3 pl1 4.5
tlt 4.5 pit 8.3
2
M
0
311(j
00
42244 431
2243 92242
0
Salinity %.
Precipitation FirVday)
Cloud Co,cr %
Wind Direction (Deg)
SlRarn Flow Severity
Severity
Vind Velocity
lean Sires m Depth ft,
Stream Width li-
80
45
32
6
1351
Ifurbidily
35U
35
164
4

Reportto: Q WATER QUALITY SECTION Page —L- of —L
k P V
NC DENR/DWQ LABORATORY (check one):
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
I I CENTRAL I I ARO I I WaRO �
For Investigation of: S T--PF."h
Sample collector (print name)
and DM-1 forms completed by: Sample collector's signature:
..
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Lab Use Only. . 4
I ti
SLAB NO �,, -�,
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
`UMBER
OF
CONTAINIERS
t d
73
r,.
_
i
I
�
Relinquished by (signgture):
ate
Time
"Cled g tur
t i
Datc Time
Relinquis a by (signature):
Date
Time
Receivedbysignature):
Date Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one): State Courier -delivere Federal Express UPS
Other:
Security Type and Conditions:
Sealed by:
Broken by:
INTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
°
�NLJMBER,
ANALYSES-,.-
RELINQUISHED
RECEIVED
DATE
TIME
:.
FROM i : THROUGH
a
^BOTTLES
REQUESTED
BY .. .. ' :.
BY:
>
lit 7 Z
2:50
�/
�1! .� t/ rI
'.:i "1
U �� y
;! 14� S` �A �1
12-17-a2
3• �.t
y�
II
l
_ -
:iF
.nrait`i-
Ya
i
-
.-1.AC
,r
r., h ., IF I �.1
-� Ilt _.
L I
'
I J-P
I,
��� fi
5.�
i
I.s!.n7,k§ __�. a' �waa
_��.. , �,.L.rniL..ur ,r i�'_
�.i.kl•'. �.� J��..
?li.. :d,a� �: �:: �.
-
{
QA\FormslSample ReceivinglCOC form WQ 4/I0/0ldbs

NCDSNR/MVQ Chemistry Laboratory
Report to: Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number. 2W1 7 i 9 � Sample ID:
Station Location:,grr W—Ar G M S2-- County. c Region: O
Sample Type: r'OG _ Priority: i' CE? Collector: '&069L
Date collected: _- 12 / 17 UZ Date received: IZ• 1 l7 I 0 Z— Date analyzed: IZ 1 1 IF / o z
Aff ctcd Parametcr(s): -Qp
Analytical Area, (check one):
❑ 1VCH ❑ tETALS
❑ VOA ❑ SVOA
❑ NUT i h(iCRO
❑ PEST
The follov.ing anomalies occurred (check all that npply):
----^- y
❑ Samples
❑ Quality Control
❑ Improper container used
❑ Iiwur.%rt failure — ro r.-porcabl: reaJlci
yCr-r
❑ VOA vials %Vith hCadsp:cc
❑ Analyst e,ior ^ no r.- 3 ,able r:4ults
',
❑ Sutcidc samptcs wi:h h:adspace
❑ S"roga:es
I
❑ Sarpl:s not rcceiv:d, but hsted on ficldshc:c
❑ None added
4m_`
❑ Sampt:s rcceived, but no: Hs:cd on fields; e..,
❑ Rccovcry ou:s,':: a:eep;anec lirnsi s
❑ Mishb:I.d as to t:sfs, Dr: s:,;atiVa, ctc.
❑ SDI�-C f:CO'. Cry'
❑ Folding lime expiecd
0 Nole added
❑ Prior to receipt ie: lab
❑ Recovery oe:sid: acc:pcanee Timisi�-
❑ Arcec receipt in lab
❑' Failed to meet ericarii for pr:eisior,
❑ Inserilcient quantity Car an=lysis
:,, •+•
❑ Incerzal sandardi
'
❑ Samal: czhibics gross non-homogcneicy
❑ Blank contamination
❑ Sample no, chemically preserved properly
Cd� QC dam reported oe:sidc o; eonnols (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ pH out orrangc (rccord'pH):
❑ Incorrect proccdL:: Used
❑ Im?roper chemical
❑ SOP lmdmional ly r..cditled with QA aad Branch
F.-ad
❑ Residual chlorine pres:nc in s2m?1:
approval
❑ Color intcrrerciwc
❑ Irvalid ins",rnen: ccli5rtion'
❑ Hea,,y emulsion fonred during exxcraccion
❑ Et_vat:d dc:cction timks d_: to:
❑ Sample bocde broken in tab - ro reportable r:salts
❑ InsuM-Icat s_r,.?lc volume
❑ OtIter (specify):
Co: nnicnts:
Ccrrcctive Action:
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and dct:rrnining that ancthcr sampl: could not be s:curcd.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until .
tB' Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Xotirication Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Cont_eted:
y
Form completed by: Data: 12 / 30 / 4
' cad Chemisc R- iew (initial):
BIOCHYN Cl PEST ❑ SVOA
7 METALS ❑ VOA
:a1ch Head II.:YIeW (ini;ial):
tA/QC R:vic%v (intttal) Lo;;:d i:.fo database by (initial):
a;r: nv i a•
{,Iimu�l+b.irttuq SA i

Report to: P., -I-. jv-,�-, WATER QUALITY SECTION
k9CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD --, ()
NC DENR/DWO LABORATORY (check one): CENTRAL ARO WaRO
Page .—L--.f—j
For Investigation of:
Sample collector (print name) 0-jxr—
and DM-1 forrns completed by:
Sample collector's signature:_
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
:Lab UseOnly-v!,.,i
NUMBER
DATE
TIME
OF
k,LAB; NO.'.!.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
SAMPLED
SAMPLED
CONTAINERS
0
Relinquished by (sign tire):
_ _
Date
Time
e 0
e cified. by jig
r
VyDate
Time
n
Relinquisfici by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by Tsignature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one): State Courier Federal Express UPS
Other:
Sealedby:
—Broken by _:'I
....
Security Type and Conditions:
onditions:
J
RECEIVED
412w.
10
Em
M, M,/
UP MR
ymm�
'Awromm,
IRA
,
k,
?
r LL P "I I 1i
J1 jj
;�, '�"; A 1.
!I
'I u
Z
i 14- 'I
-1;
U P a
I- 's
z
L
A-4Z
A A 1 17-AC:....-1 D -1 1ni- V-.... ill/1 V All n in 1 Al...

Waste Management Plan Changes
Facility q Z - / 6 Farm so,
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
❑ Increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
Other
Comments:
3 - 2,
Date

Murphy -Brown, LLC
3/26/2008 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm 52
County: Halifax
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 2000
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure: Anaerobic I
Storage Period:
Application Method:
>180 days
Irrigation
_agoon
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different Infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH In the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.): `Based on Site Specific Records
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
5,185,934 gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gaVyr
gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gal/yr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gall
gal/yr
Total 5,185,934 gal/IZ
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
9,288 lbslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 lbs/yr
lbsiyr
Total 9,288 Ibsl
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste In a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
In the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 55.91
Total N Required 1st Year: 15289.7763
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 15,289.78
Totals Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 9,288.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (6,001.78)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

a��t©®o��©����©�©ter■©®�®
�®mom©try
:
�®�■®��*��©��©��®
�®■��■m■©����©■�©������©�■©©mom
��r■���■�©�
.,, ,
■ram©®����oi�©���mm■�

Reception Area Specifications 200512011 Amendment for Pumping Agreement. Aerway Application- Fames 51 d 52 -Whitehead
Tract Field Irrigated Soft 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Tam! 02s N
Acres s TVD& Coda Apply Yield ibs NlUnit Residual fAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ors N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NAIrlt Residual 1Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NlAc
Total tbs N
Utilized
5973
1
11.7
Emporia
F
Mar-A
825.0
0.12
35
64
745.8
Cover CrDpj
Se
1
35
35
409.5
99
1158.3
2
4.5
Gritre
F
Mar -A
675.0
0.12
35
46
207
Cover C(opi
Se -A r
1
35
35
157.5
81
364.5
3
3.7
Goldsboro
F
Mar
925.0
0.12
35
76
281.2
Cover
r
1
35
35
129.5
111
410.7
4
5
Marlboro
F
Mar
925.0
0.12
35
76
380
Cover Cmd
SePtApr
1
35
35
175
111
555
5
7.3
Norfolk
F
Mar -Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
511
Cover
1
35 1
1 35
255.5
105
766.5
6
6.5
Goldsboro
F
Mar-A
925.0
0.12
35
76
494
Cover Cm
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
227.5
1 111
721.5
7
7.2
Emporia
I F
Mar-A
825.0
0.12
1 35
64
460.8
Cover Cro
1
1 35
135
252
99
712.8
8
3.1
Empoda
I F
Mar -Aug
825.0
0.12
35
64
198.4
Cover Cropi
Se
1
35
35
1084
99
308.9
9
2.9
Emporia
F
Mar-A
825.0
0.12
35
64
185.6
Cover
1
35
35
101.5
99
287.1
10
9.2
Norfolk
F
Mar-A
875.0
0.12
35
70
6"
Cover Croul
SePtAor
1
35
35
322
105
966
11
3.1
Bethera
F
Mar-A
600.0
0.12
35
37
114.7
Cover
1
35
35
108.5
72
2232
5968
4
2.8
Emporia
F
Mar-A
825.0
0.12
35
64
179.2
Cover
r
1
35
35
96
99
277.2
23
10.2
Goldsboro
F
MaLA4
925.0
0.12
35
76
1 775.2
Corer
Se
1
35
35
357
111
1132.2
5973
1
11.7
EmDcwia
D
Mar -Jul
110.0
1.25
138
1608.75
N
55
2.4
132
1544A
269.5
3153.15
2
4.5
Gftiev
D
Mar -Jul
100.0
1.25
125
562.5
N
45
2.4
108
486
233
1048.5
3
3.7
1 Goldsboro
D
Mar -Jul
130.0
1.25
163
601.25
N
Sept-AprB5
2.4
156
577.2
318.5
1178,45
4
5
1 Marlboro
D
Marjul
1%0
1.25
138
607.5
1 N
Sept-Apr60
2A
144
720
281.5
1407.5
5
7.3
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
144
1049.375
N
Se
60
2A
144
1051.2
287.75
2100.575
6
6.5
Goldsboro
D
Mar -Jul
130.0
1.25
163
105625
N
65
2.4
156
1014
3i8.5
2070.25
7
7.2
Em
D
Mar -Jul
110.0
1.25
138
990
N
55
2.4
132
950.4
269.5
1940.4
8
3.1
EmRRM
D
Mar -Jul
110.0
1.25
138
42625
N
55
2.4
132
409.2
269.5
835.45
9
2.9
Em da
D
MarJul
110.0
1.25
138
398.75
N
55
2.4
132
382.8
269.5
781.55
10
9.2
Norfolk
D
MarJul
115.0
1.25
144
1322.5
N
80
2.4
144
1324.6
287.75
2647.3
11
3.1
Bedrera
D
MarJul
105.0
1.25
131
406,875
N
Se
40
2.4
96
297.6
227.25
704.475
5968
4
2.8
1 Emporia
D
MarJul
110.0
1.25
13B
385
1 N
Se
55
2A
132
369.6
269.5
754.E
1 23
10.2
Gold
D
MarJul
130.0
1.25
163
1657.5
N
SOMAW
65
2.4
156
1591.2
31&5
3248.7
5973
1
11.7
Emporia
O
ADr-AuQ
35.0
4
1
140
1638
0
0
140
1638
2
4.5
GLbM
D
-A
35.0
4
140
630
0
0
140
630
3
3.7
Goldsboro
O
45.0
4
180
666
0
0
180
666
4
5
Marlboro
O
45.0
4
180
900
0
0
180
900
5
7.3
Norfolk
O
42.0
4
168
1226.4
0
0
16B
1225.4
6
6.5 1
Goldsboro
0
A
45.0
4
180
1170
0
0
180
1170
7
7.2
Emporia
0
AprAtn
3&0
4
140
1008
1
0
0
140
1008
8
3.1
Emporia
1 O
Aor-Auo
1 35.0
4
140
434
-
0
0
140
434
9
2.9
Em a
O
Apr-Auq
35.0
4
140
406
0
0
140
406
10
9.2
Norfolk
O
ADr-Aw
42.0
4
168
1545.6
0
0
168
1545.6
11
3.1
Bemera
0
-A
35.0
4
140
434
0
0
140
434
5968
4
2.8
Emporia
0
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
1
140
392
0
0
140
392
23
10.2
Goldsboro
O
Apr-Aua
45.0
4
180
1836
0
0
180
1836
Totals., 231.6 286111A 13420A 42038.8

This plan does not Include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers In some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine Inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late In the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage Just before heading as Is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to Interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N I ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N / acre I yr
Q
Matua
50 lbs N 1 ton
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
In the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT rlanimal Farm Total
Farrow to Wean 0.84
2000 Farrow to Feeder 1 2000
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2000 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 33 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 80 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by Initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, It is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
Freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
Inlhr
inches
Zone 1
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
Zone 2
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
Zone 3
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
Zone 4
Gritney
BIC
0.5
1
Zone 5
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
A
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
B
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
C
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
D
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
E
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
F
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
This plan is written on site specific documentation of
Waste/PAN production from June 2001-Sept 2003.
Fields A-C are optional for this plan. Application on these areas will be made
with an aerway machine.
Wildlife plantings are optional for this plan. Crops may include Sunflowers,
Chufa, Millet, or Peas. PAN rates listed are equal to or slightly lower than
standard nutrient recommendations from NRCS and NCWLRC for wildlife
plots.
For all fields, the grower will take the followin_g residuals:
15 lbs from any crop following Soybeans
All PAN applied (allowed 35 Ibs) from any crop following Cover Crop
The Bermuda is written for a hay/graze combination. At least half of the
yield will be removed for hay. _
7 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farm 52
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
OwnerlManager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner; M
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner)
Signature:
+0r Z►
3--25-08
Date
3-2S- 08
Date
Name of Technical Specialist: Amy E. Roberson
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, Drewer 856 _
Warsaw. NC 28398
Telephone:
Signature:
C�
293-3434
Date
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fail or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist'. Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

J
Murphy -Brown, LLC 4/9/2009 P.O. Sox 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN qa-10
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm 52
County: Halifax
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 2000
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
RECEIVED � DE�Nn Se�ctio�
A4u ...
APR 0 9 Ms
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
r
1 of 8 r

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, tons, etc.): *Based on Site Specific Records
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gal/yr
gal/yr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
5,185,934 gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gall r
gallyr
Total 5,185,934 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibs/yr
Ibslyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
9,288 Ibslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
lbs/yr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibs/ r
Ibslyr
Total 9,288 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner,
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season,
Total Irrigated Acreage: 55.91
Total N Required 1st Year: 15289.7763
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 15,289.78
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 9,288.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (6,001.78)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility,
2of8

:Reception Area Specifications
Tract FifMid FmRjlated - Soil I st Crop Time to 1stCrop istCrop LbsNlAc US N Total Fbs-N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs NfUnit Residual lAc
PPrIf
.71 FI 111T a =1 EFF1.1
OMIT
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifications
I Tract Field Irrigated Soil Ist Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs N/Ac Lbs N Total Ibs NJ 2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N/Ac Lbs N Total Ibs NI Total I Total Ibs NI
Acreaae Tvoe Code Aoolv Yield Ibs NfUnit Residual !Ac Utilized Code Aooly Yield Ibs N/Unit Residual IAc Utilized Lbs N/Ac Utilized
3(b) of 8

■�■®���©����©�����o©�■®mom
-®�-
":i'
©t�'1i'ial:!!•
•111
�' L�©®®
'W'i�.Llt�•wJ
rG�'..�:JOr©-®©®®

Reception Area Specifications 2006/2011 Amendment for Pumping Agreement - Aerway Application- Farms 51 & 52 - Whitehead
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acrea e Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code - Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
Total
Lbs NlAc
Total Ibs N
Utilized
5973
1
11.7
Emporia
F
Mar -A
825.0
0.12
35
64
748.8
Cover C
1
35
35
409.5
99
1158.3
2
4.5
Gdtr*y
F
Mar -Aug
675.0
0.12
35
46
207
Cover Crod
Se - r
1
35
35
157.5
81
364.5
3
3.7
Goldsboro
F
Mar -A
925.0
0.12
35
76
281.2
Cover
5e
1
35
35
129.5
111
410.7
4
5
Marlboro
F
Mar-A
925.0
0.12
35
76
380
Cover
1
35
35
175
111
555
5
7.3
Norfolk
F
Mar -A
875.0
0.12
35
70
511
Cover Cmd
Se
1
35
35
255.5
105
766.5
6
6.5
Goldsboro
F
Mar -Aug
925.0
0.12
35
76
494
Cover
1
35
35
227.5
111
721.5
7
1 7.2
Emporia
F
I Mar-A
625.0
1 0.12
35
1 64
460.8
Cover C
SeUt-Apr
1
f 35
1 35
252
99
712.8
8
3.1
Emporia
F
Mar -ALA
825.0
0.12
35
64
198.4
Cover CnAA
Sept-&K
1
35
35
108.5
99
306.9
9
2.9
Emporia
F
Mar-A
825.0
0.12
35
64
185.6
Cover
1
35
35
101.5
1 99
287.1
10
9.2
Norfolk
F
Mar-Auq
875.0
0.12
35
70
644
Cover
1
35
35
322
105
966
11
3.1
Bethera
F
Mar-
600.0
0.12
35
37
114.7
Cover Croj
SftA4W
1
35
35
108.5
72
223.2
5968
4
2.8
Emppris
F
Mar -Aug
8250
0.12
35
64
179.2
Cover
1
35
35
98
99
277.2
23
10.2
Goldsboro
F
Mar -A
925.0
0.12
35
76
775.2
Cover
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
35
35
357
111
1132.2
5973
1
1 11.7
Emporia
D
Mar-JW
110.0
1 1.25
1 138
1608.75
N
55
2.4
132
1544.4
269.5
3153.15
2
4.5
Gritne
D
MarJul
100.0
1.25
125
562.5
N
45
2.4
1 108
486
233
1048.5
3
3.7
Goldsboro
D
Mar -Jul
130.0
1.25
163
601.25
1 N
Se
65
2.4
156
577.2
1 318.5
1178.45
4
5
Marlboro
D
Mar -Jul
110.0
1.25
138
687.5
N
Sept-Alix
60
2.4
144
720
281.5
1407.5
5
7.3
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
144
1049.375
N
S80:6E
60
2.4
144
1051.2
287.75
2100.575
6
6.5
Goldsboro
D
Mar -Jul
130.0
1.25
163
1056.25
N
65
2.4
156
1014
318.5
2070.25
7
7.2
Emporia
D
MarJrd
110.0
1.25
138
990
N
55
2.4
132
950.4
269.5
1940A
8
3.1
Emporia
D
Mar -jut
110.0
1.25
138
426.25
N
Sept-Aly
55
2.4
132
409.2
269.5
835A5
9
2.9
EmRpria
D
Mar-jul
110.0
1 1.25
138
398.75
N
I Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
382.8
269.5
781.55
10
9.2
Norfolk
D
Mar-lul
115.0
1.25
144
1322.5
N
60
2.4
1 1"
1324.8
287.75
2647.3
11
3.1
Bethera
D
Mar -Jul
105.0
1.25
131
406.875
N
40
2.4
96
297.6
227.25
704.475
5968
4
2.8
Emporia
D
Mar -Jul
110.0
1.25
138
385
N
55
2.4
132
369.6
269.5
754.6
23
10.2
Goldsboro
D
Maraud
130.0
1.25
163
1657.5
N
65
2.4
156
1591.2
318.5
3248.7
5973
1
11.7
Emporia
O
35.0
4
140
1638
•
0
0
140
1638
2
1 4.5
Gritne
O
35.0
4
140
630
1
0
0
140
630
3
1 3.7
Goldsboro
O
ADr-AuQ
45.0
4
1
180
666
"
0
0
180
666
4
5
Marlboro
O
-A
45.0
4
180
900
0
0
180
900
5
7.3
Norfolk
O
42.0
4
168
1226.4
0
0
168
1226.4
6
6.5
Goldsboro
O
_Agr-Aug
Apr -Aug
45.0
4
180
1170
0
0
180
1170
7
7.2
Emporia
O
ADr-Aua
35.0
4
140
1008
0
0
140
1008
8
3.1
Emporia
O
35.0
4
140
434
0
0
140
434
9
2.9
Emporia
O
Apr-A09
35.0
4
140
406
0
0
140
406
10
9.2
Norfolk
O
Apr-AApr-Aua
42.0
4
168
1545.6
0
0
168
1545.6
11
1 3.1
Bethera
O
Aor-Auq
35.0
4
140
434
0
0
140
434
5968
4
1 2.8
Emporia
O
A A
35.0
4
140
392
0
0
140
392
23
10.2
Goldsboro
O
A A
45.0
4
180
1836
0
0
180
1836
Totals. 231.6 28618.4 13420.4 42038.8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue - Grazed
H Fescue - Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Q Matua
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N 1 lbs lint
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
50 Ibs N / acre
50 lbs N / acre
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushel
40 lbs N 1 acre / yr
50 lbs N / ton
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
2000 Farrow to Feeder 1 2000
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2000 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 33 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 80 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
/s1�;1�L+lirfi. [�1► N]�'a'I����1i�L�L�L•�L�lit3
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop _
inlhr
* inches
Zone 1
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
Zone 2
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
Zone 3
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
Zone 4
Gritney
BIC
0.5
1
Zone 5
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
A
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
B
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
C
Emporia
BIC
0.4
1
D
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
E
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
F
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
This plan is written on site specific documentation of
Waste/PAN production from June 2001-Sept 2003.
Fields A-C are optional for this plan. Application on these areas will be made
with an aerway machine.
Wildlife plantings are optional for this plan. Crops may include Sunflowers,
Chufa, Millet, or Peas. PAN rates listed are equal to or slightly lower than
standard nutrient recommendations from NRCS and NCWLRC for wildlife
plots.
For all fields, the grower will take the following residuals.
15 Ibs from any crop following Soybeans
All PAN applied (allowed 35 Ibs) from any crop following Cover Crop
The Bermuda is written for a hay/graze combination. At least half of the
yield will be removed for hay.
7 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farm 52
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LI_C
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LI_C
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
Amy E. Roberson
Affiliation:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address:
2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
[phone]
Signature:
Date
8 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
{continued}
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

O�O� W A
r
Brown's of Carolina, Inc., VA Division
Farm #52
PO Box 1240
Waverly VA 23890
Dear Jeff Turner:
MichaelF. Easley,Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Z'
October 15, 2004
f O \
c
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA24 01.0
Farm #52
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
In accordance with your application received on September 16, 2004, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Brown's of Carolina, Inc., VA Division, authorizing the
operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in
accordance with NPDES General Permit NCA200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Faun #52, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
an annual average of 2000 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007, and shall hereby void Certificate
of Coverage Number AWS420010 dated May 1, 2003, and shall be subject to the conditions and
limitations as specified therein. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the
system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's
CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production
greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Ouality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each Year.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
N e Caroli
luralll
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer-50%Recycled110%Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
v ..
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Pile NCA242010
APS Files

Murphy -Brown, LLC 11/7/2005 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s): Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm Name: Farm 52
County: Halifax
f' Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 2000
J Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
a' Ott Feeder to Finish
ge Structure: Anaerobic Lagoon
�d,� Storage Period: >180 days
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the'crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft', tons, etc.): 'Based on Site Specific Records
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
5,185,934 gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
gallyr
Total 5,185,934 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
9,288 Ibslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Total 9,288 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total irrigated Acreage: 55.91
Total N Required 1st Year: 15289.7763
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 15,289.78
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 9,288.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (6,001.78)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and Gelds that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated soil 1st Crop Time to 1stCrop 1stCrop LbSNIAC Lbs N Tow 1b
Acrea2e Utilized
q
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifications
— Tract Field IMqated Soil Ist Crop Time to Ist Crop Ist Crop LbsN/ c LbS N Total lbs 2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAC Lbs N Total Ibs
�WmmmAcreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NJUnit Residual /Ac Utilized Code AppIX Yield Ibs N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
3(b) of 8

Reception Area Specifications 2004R005Amendm nt for PumpIngAgr rnem-AcxayAppllcafion-Farms51 52
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1 st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs N/Unit Residual IAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N/Ac Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield Ibs N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs N/Ac
Total Ibs N
Utilized
lose
1
0.8
Altavista
F
A r-A
850.0
0.12
35
67
53.5
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
28
102
81.6
2A
34.8
State
F
Apr -Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
2436
CoverCro
Se t-A r
1
35
35
1218
105
3654
213
14
13
Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
871
CoverCro
Se -
1
35
35
455
102
1326
2.5
Bibb
F
Apr -Aug
675.0
0.12
35
46
115
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
87.5
81
202.5
5
21.5
State
F
A ug
875.0
0.12
35
70
1505
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
752.5
105
2257.5
8
6
Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
402
CoverCro
Se -A r
1
35
35
210
102
612
9
6.5
1 Altavista
F
I ADr-AuQ
850.0
0.12
35
1 67
435.5
CoverCro
Se t A r
1 1
35
1
35
1 227.5
102
663
10
27.5
Boiac
F
Apr -Aug
750.0
1 0.12
35
55
1512.5
CoverCro
Se t-A r
1 1
35
35
962.5
90
2475
11 W
11
Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
737
CioverCro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
385
102
1122
11 E
15.8
State
F
Apr-AApr-AuQ
875.0
0.12
35
70
1106
CoverCro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
553
105
1659
12
2
Altavista
F
A r-Auq
850.0
0.12
35
67
134
CoverCroQ
Sept r
1
35
35
70
102
204
13
18
State
F
A r-A22
875.0.
0.12
35
70
1260
CDverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
630
105
1890
14
25
State
F
Apr-AApr-Auq
875.0
0.12
35
70
1750
1 CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
875
105
2625
16
7.6
State
F
Apr-AApr-Auct
875.0
0.12
35
70
532
1 CoverCro
Se t-A r
1
35
35
266
105
798
17
3
Altavista
F
A r-A
850.o
0.12
1 35
67
201
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
105
102
306
18
22.2
Tarboro
F
A r-Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
821.4
CoverCro
Sept- r
1
35
35
777
72
1598.4
19
39
1 Tarboro
F
A r-Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
1443
CoverCrn
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
1365
72
2808
22
9
Altavista
F
A r-Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
603
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
315
102
918
24
3.8
Tarboro
F
AR r-Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
140.E
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
133
72
273.6
25
1
Tarboro
FApr-Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
37
CoverCro
Se t-A r
1
35
35
35
72
72
26
13.6
Bo'ac
F
A r-A
750.0
0.12
35
55
1 748
CoverCro
Se t-A r
7
1 35
35
476
90
1224
27
15.3
Tarboro
F
Apr -Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
566.1
CoverCro
Se t-A r
1
1 35
35
535.5
72
1101.6
30
6.8
State
I F
Az)r-Auq
1 875.0
0.12
1 35
70
476
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
238
105
714
31
11.3
State
F
A r-Auq
875.0
0.12
35
70
791
CoverCro
$e t-A r
1
35
35
395.5
105
1186.5
rotats. 317 18676.7 11095 29771.7

Reception Area Specifications 2004WOAmendment for Pumping Agreemenr-AennyAppk*tfo„-Ftms5fs52
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield lbs N1Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
11-bsNIACI
jTotallbsN
Utillzed
Josev
1
0.8
Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
53.6
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
28
102
81.6
2A
34.8
State
F
Apr -Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
2436
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
1218
105
3654
2B
13
Altavista
F
A r Aup
850.0
0.12
35
67
871
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
455
102
1326
4
2.5
Bibb
F
Apr-AApr-AW
675.0
0.12
35
46
115
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
87.5
81
202.5
5
21.5
State
F
Apr-AugApr.Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
1505
CoverCro
Se -A r
1
35
35
752.5
105
2257.5
8
6
Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
1 67
402
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
210
102
612
9
6.5
1 Altavista
F
I Apr -Aug
850.0
1 0.12
35
67
435.5
CoverCro
Se -A r
1
1 35
1 35
227.5
1 102
663
/\ 10
27.5
Bo' c
F
A uq
750.4
1 0.12
35
55
1512.5
CoverCrx)p
Se -A r
1
35
35
962.5
90
2475
11 W
11
Altavista
F
Apr-ALrR
850.0
0.12
35
67
737
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
385
102
1122
11 E
15.8
State
F
A r Au
875.0
0.12
35
70
1106
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
553
105
1659
12
2
Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
W.0
0.12
35
67
134
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
70
102
204
13
18
State
F
Apr -Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
1260
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
630
105
1890
14
25
State
F
Apr -Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
1750
CoverCro
Se -A r
1
35
35
875
105
2625
16
7.6
State
F
ARr-Auq
875.0
0.12
35
1 70
532
CoverCro
Sept-Apr,
1
35
35
266
105
798
17
3
1 Altavista
F
I Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
201
CoverCro
Sept -Apr
1
35
1
35
105
102
306
18
22.2
1 Tarboro
F
Apr-AuApr-Auq
600.0
1 0.12
35
37
821.4
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
777
72
1598.4
19
39
1 Tarboro
F
A r-Au
600.0
0.12
35
37
1443
CoverCroe
Se -A r
1
35
35
1365
72
2808
22
9
1 Altavista
F
Apr -Aug
850.0
0.12
35
67
603
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
315
102
918
24
3.8
Tarboro
F
ADr-Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
140.6
CoverCro
Sept -Apr
i
35
35
133
72
1 273.6
25
1
Tarboro
F
A ug
600.0
0.12
35
37
37
CoverCro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
35
72
72
26
13.6
Bojac
F
Apr -Aug
750.0
0.12
35
55
748
CoverCro
Sept-Apr
1
35
35
476
90
1224
27
15.3
Tarboro
F
Apr -Aug
600.0
0.12
35
37
566.1
CoverCrop
Se -A r
1
1 35
1 35
535.5
72
1101.6
30
6.8
State
F
Apr -Aug
875.0
0.12
35
70
476
CoverCro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
238
105
714
31
11.3
State
F
Apr-AuApr-Auq
875.0
0.12
35
70
791
CoverCro
Se i-A r
1
35
35
395.5
105
1186.5
Totals: 317 18B76.7 11095 29771.7

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 Ibs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 Ibs N 1 bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 Ibs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 Ibs N / Ibs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 Ibs N / ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 Ibs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 Ibs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 Ibs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 Ibs N I cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 Ibs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 Ibs N 1 bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 Ibs N / acre / yr
0
Matua
50 Ibs N / ton
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
2000 Farrow to Feeder 1 2000
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2000 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 33 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 80 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant_
Type
Crop
inlhr
* inches
Zone 1
Emporia
B
0.4
1
Zone 2
Emporia
B
0.4
1
Zone 3
Emporia
B
0.4
1
Zone 4
Gritney
B
0.5
1
Zone 5
Emporia
B
0.4
1
A
Emporia
B
0.4
1
B
Emporia
B
0.4
1
#REF! C
Emporia
B
0.4
1
D
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
E
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
F
Emporia
Wildlife
0.4
1
6 of 8

Additional Comments:
This plan is written on site specific documentation of
Waste/PAN production from June 2001-Sept 2003.
The bermuda rate in this plan is a combination of hay & graze rates.
At least half the yield will be removed as hay.
Fields A-C are optional for this plan. Application on these areas will be made
with an aerway machine.
Wildlife plantings are optional for this plan, Crops may include Sunflowers,
Chufa, Millet, or Peas. PAN rates listed are equal to or slightly lower than
standad nutrient recommendations from NRCS and NCWLRC for wildlife
plots.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farm 52
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the now
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brawn, LLC
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owrWrh
Signature:
00
Name of Technical Specialist: Dawn Williamson
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC _
Address: T 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856 ^
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: (910)_293-3434
Signature:
Date
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients:
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 -Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

Farm 52
Scale: 1 "=400'
Total Field = 1.34
Ac.
r Total Field
= 3.61 Ac. r
7i Total Field
= 1.28
Ac.
Total Field
= 28.15 Ac.
A
V I`Ca t
Total
Field = 7.39 Ac.
Total
Field = 3.35
Ac.
I ]ti J
yr d, L II a
■
a ■ ■
R
!
R
R
! ■
■
! a s
a
a !
ld
R
a „�
■ !
! a
■ q
■
a ■ o.
a a
a ■
R
! II
R !
R a
a ■
P a
a ��'`
q
a ■
a
! a
■ !
R g
a
a
s g a
!
p ! R
a R
■ R a
a R ! a R R
a
a !
a i !
a !
a x
! p a
a R
R s ■ x
■ !
R
a x
! R
x a
R a a a
a ! it a a
s a R s
■ ■ R II
a R a ! a
R ■
R
a R
a a !
R R
■
a ■ ! ■
q R ! a ■
■ R
!
g R
a R p x
a a q
R !
a a a ■
R a x a R
a ! a a
■ R
R ■
q
a
a R R IN
a
p a
a ■
■ a
q
a
R a ■ x
! s ■ ■
■ !
a !
x
! R ■ a
a
!
R
!
x p
.■ a R
p ■ R ■
isII R
R
II
v a
II
R R
is R
■ R !
■ R R
a ■
■
INx
! ■
x
a
a a x
■ R ■ Total Field
— 31.24
Ac.
a
R a
■ a p
R
!
!
! a
■ a
R
g
!
g R
Wells w/
p
■
■
100'
■
offsets
Hog Houses
and
Logoon
�L
d-
Total
Field = 2.23
Ac.

1 0.12 0.25
�t1i®�I�Kiiz�rur�N�f
miles
K�s
r;Works ww-

Additional Comments:
Leased land listed in this amendment may be used for aerway aeplication
from lagoons at Farm 51 or 52.
All leased land is optional for both plans.
7of8

1flP13/2025 13:57 34 PAGE 04
Pr S- 1 !�-a
Animal Waste Utilization Agreement
Murphy Brown LLC. Waverly Division
1, 0 S2 �, f y►� hereby give M � ()km (if to apply animal. waste
from the WaSTe utilization system Oil res of my land for the duration of time
specified below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, and other trace elements and
when properly applied should not Harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of
waste will reduce my overall needs for commercial fertilizer, and that: Nitrogen
limitations exist based on individual faro] Waste Utilization I lans. After the completion
of animal waste application, Murphy Brown LLC shall provide said Landowner / Farmer
with a Nitrogen total of animal waste derived nutrients vs. the remaining nutrients
allowed in the Waste Utilization Plan.
Adjacent Landowr
Waste Producer
Technical Representative Date:
a4 r-2 ,7 �2 0 o S`
-'tdw '�Oas
Terri of Agreement , 20 U 5- to + c. 7, 20

10i13/2025 13:57 34
PAGE 05
Provided Nutrient Totals
Murphy Brown .LLC. Waverly Division
Nitrogen Recommended for crop
Animal Waste Nitrogen applied to crop
Remaining Nitrogen for Crop
Adjacent Landowner/ Farmer
Waste Producer / Representative YJ kIlh. Date:
��-6�

o�0� W a 7
�9p�
co r
• ' y
0 Y
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm #52
PO Box 1240
Waverly VA 23890
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS420010
Farm #52
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of -Water -Quality -(Division) -to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 14, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
. of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Brown's of Carolina, Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS420010 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This_ approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Farm #52, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
an annual average of 2000 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004: Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary.. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
• The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to np date
under this pernut conve�any property rights in either real or personal property. ]1
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit .
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
- - Quality•Staff,may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. KIimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS420010
NDPU Files

APR-10-2001 TUE 03:24 Phi BROWN'SOFCAROLINA ` 9102966166 P. 19
•
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: BOC #'t9 —7 Noc.+ ;Z*S2.
Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Manager: Glenn Davis
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described In this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner): Glenn Davis
Signature: 4- L
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation:
Brown's of Carolina
Address: _
785 Hwy 24 East, PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398 - -
Telephone:
{910) 296-1,800
Signature:
•
Date
. —F .. '�.^`-s�.�e., �..°i�-reK'Y �e�x �.. �;i?'r..F•�i r.:�P:n .. ��-�ya, �^...i _... ..
8of8
B00101080195
4�

` APR-10--2001 `SUE 03 ; 22 Phi BROWN' SOFCAROL I NA ' 9102966156 P. 12
Brown's of Carolina 8/28/00 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 211388
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Grower(s): Brown's of Carolina
Farm Name: BBC #1 a
County: Halifax
Farm Cataacity:
Farrow to wean
Farrow to Feeder 2000
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure; — - Anaerobic
Storage Period; >180 days
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
Is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
• before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
0
Several factors are Important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it Is applied In an environmentally safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding tapacitles.
i 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year, Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it Is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which Is not allowed
under DWO regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
B. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8
{St7-0 ].0108018 _

APR-1.0-2001 TUE 03;22 PM BROWN' SOFCAROLINA' 9102966166 P. 13
It
•
This plan is based on the waste applilcatlon method shown above, If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste Is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. in some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. I_Ime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production,
This waste utilization planr If carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission,
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, fe, tons, etc,):
Capacity— LIE& Waste Produced per Animal otal
Farrow to Wean
3212 gaVyr
gaVyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
8,030,000 gaVyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gaVyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
galyr
Feeder to Finish
086 gallyr
gallyr
Total 8,030,0 0 ga lyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capaeltv iYR2 Nitrogen Produced pgrAnimal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibsyr
lbslyr
2000
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibsyr
13,000 lbstyr
Farrow to Finish
26 lbsNr
ibsyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 IbeV
lbsyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibsyr
lbom
Total 13,000 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job_ You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to applythe waste In a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops Indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the trope under irrigation may uptake and utiC¢e
In the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 45.9
Total N Required 1st Year. 13701.5
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 13,791.50
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 13,000.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (791.50)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and Gelds that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the slte,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

APR-1-0--2001 TUE 03.23 PH BROWN' SOFCAROLINA , 9102966166 P. 15
4D
•
•
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine Inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are gazed to a
height of four Inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late In the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage Just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier, You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recamtnended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 Its N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Sermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N I ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N / ton
F
Cotton
0,12 Ibs N / lbs lint
G.
Fescue - Grazed
50 Ibs N / ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
I
Oats
1-.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 ibs N ! acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N ! acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N I cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 ibs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4018
H0010IOB0191

APR-10-2001 TUE 03:23 PM BROWN'SOFCAROLINA' 9102966166 P. 16
Y
0
SLUDGE APPLICATION;
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
In the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PAN! r/animal Farm Total! ►
Farrow to Wean 0.64
2000 Farrow to Feeder 1 2000
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0,072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates, The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2000 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 33 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 80 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate Is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids, The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface Irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an Irrigation system is Installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan Invalid.
'This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop Is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation, The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 8 months. In no Instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It Is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown In the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts'of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Cell your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Sofa
800101.0801.92

APR-10-2001 TUE 03!23
PM BROWN'SOFCAROLINA
9102966166 P. 17
. Application
Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application
Rate Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant Type_
Crop
INN
*inches
3546
A Emporia
a
0.4
1
3546
B Gritney
81
0.5
1
354a
C Gritney
B
0.5
1
3546
D Emporia
B
0.4
1
354a
E Emporia
B
0.4
1
3546
F Marlboro
B
0.66
1
3546
G Emporia
B
0.4
1
3548
H Emporia
13
0.4
1
3546
1 Emporia
a
0.4
1
•
•
6 of a
B00101080193

APR-1.0-2001 TUE 03:24 FM BROWN`SOF'CAROLINA
9102966166 P. 18
C
0
Additional Comments:
This elan revised to reflect wetted acres by hydrant. The rates shown In this
.plan are for controlled grazing, just as_it was originally.
7 of 8
BDOIOI080194

or awn s Qt Uarolina Farm #I n Netted Acreage Map
�........ 5.43 Ac.
LEGEND
ZONE A
• ZONE 8 -
• ZONE C
• ZONE D
• ZONE E
• ZONE F
B00101080019
-0
z.
a
N
co
rn
rn
rn
rn

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm #19
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
NCDENR
NOM)-I CARouNA DEPARTMEW OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 5, 1998 '
JUN 1 510 ,..1
IEHNR RALEiGh REMNAL OFFICE -
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS420010
Farm # 19
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
In accordance with your application received on April 24, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Brown's of Carolina, Inc. , authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Farm #19, located in Halifax County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2000 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this CM
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. '
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by.the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 500k recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
W

X
Certificate of Coverage AWS420010
Farm #19
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
Sincerely,
�[ A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section.
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

1
State of North Carolina �W1+D
Department of Environment and Natural Resources' i //?,* ,
Division of Water Quality'1N
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 4, AFC 4 1995
(THIS FORM BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) Non�p
M MA-$c
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Opera> ONS Poniiting
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FacilityName: Farm #19
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Brown's toftCaro I ina, Inc.
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 487
City, State: Warsaw NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-296-1800
1.4 County where facility is located: Halifax
Zip: 28398
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Douglas Hill Farm Rd. approx. 2 miles N. of
Intersection wl US 258
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Jimmy Vinson - -
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Srown0s of Carolina, Inc.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 12/01/93
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: �42 (county number); 10 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descriptton Swine operation
Ta—rrow to Feeder
2000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Myes; F7no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number -for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1126/98 Page l of 4

'!
3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 58.6 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 58.6
2.4 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? _ or NO (please circle one)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NR tandards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? j- 7e%.
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? _ - a -7 - / 1
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.I The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 l Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.)
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as an irrigation design,
or site evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4

Facility Number: 42 - 10
Facility Name: Farm #19
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, 152e. " c e t _� L1.i,G ,e (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest'that
this application for Z. © •C- -"' /�' _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature Date
5 AGER'S CE TIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, - �-!/•-(Manager's name listed in question 1.6); attest that this
appli t' n for �2au>ti C,¢,IcL��R �l {Facility name listed in question 1.1}
has reviewe y me and is accurate and complete tote best ot my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
packag be returned as incompie e.
Signature Date
THE CAMpLETED-APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
j / SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-F 1/2S/9S Pagc. :t c+f tl

a
ri
/ q,
-f)t7N p-,
OF CAR4LINA~.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC. - FARM 18 AND 19
STATE ROAD # 1100 & "TATE ROAD # 1101- HALIFAX COUNTY
(2) 2000 SOW FARM FARROW TO FEEDER
ULF,hu'llUNS: TAKE HIGHWAY # 903 TO SNOW HILL, THEN TAKE
HIGHWAY # 258 TO HALIFAX COUNTY. AFTER CROSSING IN TO HALIFAX
COUNTY TAKE THE FIRST ROAD TO THE LEFT SR # 1100 (DOUGLAS HILL FARM
ROAD). TAKE FARM ROAD TO THE LEFT APPROX: I.2 MILES DIRECTLY ACROSS
FROM SR # 1101, TO GET TO FARM 19. TAKE SR # 1101 AND FARM 18 WILL
BE ON THE RIGHT.
MAILING ADDRESS:
MR. SCOTT GURKIN
ROUTE 2, BOX 228
SCOTLAND NECK ,NC 27874
HOME TELEPHONE: [phone]
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
MR. SCOTT GURKIN
STATE ROAD # 1100
SCOTLAND NECK, NC 27872
imoWN'S UP CARU:.INA, INC.
303 17AST ('01.1-Fol: 51'111;rl' • f .U. Tli),X 497 • WARSAW, NX. 2Rl')XA1AA7 • OFFICE: 191c)1 293-21R1 0 FAX: [phone]

' k nIla
...:..._..�.
Lo Im � 1571 O
FiA
r♦ LI
JAlt - 1
111Z b� fa ��
1171 LLM
5p�0 Na jin o
Dv..m r
Cmrae6 ` 1491
1,1J1 1l.O1 41
D. sln.
i
1>�
J!Q! CQTI1/o NEC%
w LPl L 1
r ,
i
1T .
lul
li4C �
1!]111 �Ory 11$ lE4p
N.rM.I�
im
1l11 dr ' .1
For. 27
TP
�� ♦ .p
a
�
4
ID lawn
113A.
IL
ILU
/
I •4
/
Im
im
f
♦
A.
!!9
Is n NOKY000%
A%
1.,. Im
.
J
JtNL-ua LM-
T
?
im
�
F

Animal N-Vaste Management PIan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
! QExisti a or NeNv or Expanded (please circle one) j
S eneral Information: _
Dame of Farm:_ �,f✓rn� 9
0,wner(s) Name, e
Facility No: /D
_ PhoneNo,
Mailing Address: t� 7 ZI—) 7e �. _,K4C ' ?2 ?- :6
Farrn Locariott: Qi Count• Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude:.34/, 6 D .34 -
Please anach a copy of a county road map with loc_tion identified and
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Oyeration De5crintion:
Type of Swine No.ofAnimals
J Wcan to Feeder
Z Feeder to Finish
Z F 014, to Wears
?YFarsow• to Frder ZOO t::>
:1 Farrow to Finish
u
below;,Oe specific: road
' //oo S,e
T1pe of Poultry No. of.inirnais Trpe of Cattle No. ofAninutls
Layer -M Daisy
M Pullets D Beef
Other Type of Livestock;: ,\`timber of Animals:
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Design Capacity. Addirichal Design Capacity:
Total Design Caaacin :
Acreage Available for Application: 'f:>0' & Required Acreage:l',arS �_��+ so- G
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds :_L Total Cap §�i
2S Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or lease circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPR41' FIELD (please circle one)
Owner/ (Manager Agreement
I (we) Verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I Ove) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures establisbcd in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage st srem or construction of new facilities will re»wire a new certification to be submitted to the Divisiatz of
Environmental.Management before the ne-x animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of a iiraal
waste from the storage or application s}'stem to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the ?!-vc=. '_'t-hour storm and there must not be run-ozf from the application of animal
Waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conser•atien Service. The aper' ved plan will be fled at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Nate: Canso:•: ation District. I k xv know that any mod; 5 cation must be approved.by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to imeiemeztation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DELI or a nc% crnifi:aticn iif the aecroved plant is chanced't within 60 d3t•s of a title transfer.
\gate of Land Owner : S v"j G
Siunature:
Larne of MLinsgenif Differ,-ni from owners:
Signature:
Date:
Dote:
9%

�D), Anplication and H3,,dlin_a_Equipment
Check Me nppropr'((((r bo.v
I - i;tinQ or x .andin� foci its• with existing waste apolic3tion eaui meat (Vti't.-P or Y)
Animal (waste application equipment specified in the plan bas been either field calibrated or evaluated in
ac:ordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as ncc=ssary to accommodate the
waste manage-ment plan. (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates oot to
c.,zceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has b=a
ca
established: required buffers n be maintained and calibration and adjustment gui=ce are contain as part or'
the plan).
G _Ne«•. ex anded, or e. ' t'ng facilitv with ur existing waste ae iioatinn eat:! erit rav
-ttQati n. (l)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan bps been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipraeat can cave: the area recuired by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or auLnent loading :aces: a schedule for timing of
applications has bern established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and'adill'stment guidance are
Contained as part of the plan).
1 dew. ex2aa ded. or existing facility without existinz waste application equipment tnr 13TId
spreading n t using s2rav i i'gat' (NVZ P or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been, selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (prcposed application equipment can toyer the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has beta established: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment *guidance are
contained as pan of the plan).
Tame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:_ZI/11� I{ zvl.PC'S
Address(Agency - �,� Phone No.: 9t
S ignarure: Daze. _4z2 �
-% ltanaae t an meraencv act' Pla ( E} Odor trnl.In tD
;. «U.-P C or )
The waste management plan for this facHiry includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an insect Control'
Checklist. a Mo�rmlity Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated, with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Managemcnt Practices to Control insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Nianagemcnt Plan and the Emcrgcacy Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: %T C
���G BL�G r� v OX l3
Address(Aaency : r.�,� , F,aYA Phone No.:-19,,9��c��
Signature: Dare: Z Z
F) 11,ritten � mice of Ne • or Ex ondina Sivine Farm
The foilo%iinb signature block is only to be used for new or expanding s,%ine farms that be constru a ter June
6. If the facilit}' was built before ,Tune 21. 1996. tiyhen «•as it constructed or last eCpan
I t.�=} certi y t aye attempted to contact by cc:ii:tcd ntail all adjoining pr�pe:ty era and all grope ty owners
who own property located acro , is road. street. or highway from this ne,.v andir.p s irc farm. The notice was in
compliance with the %auiremrnts of NC A :epy of the notic- rda list of the ^rccercy owners notified is
act:shed.
-Name of Land 0«•ner :
Signature:
Fame of Nlana1,;!r, ... ��
_ it sit, tr�tn ,� rtCri:
Si, -,nature ��'_ D3te:
AWC .- J��ar� t. 1047 t

C) Runoff Controls fro. Exterior oft (RC)
Facility «ith emerior lots
Methods to rtinirttize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have testalle: as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certificat' is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation:.
Address{Agency): Phone tio.:
Sisnature: te:
D) An ' ntion and Handling Eguipment In tallation (WUP or I)
Chec.� the appraprrerr block +n
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and�djustment materials ba •e n -. prove d to the o ners and are cg�tai = as par, of the plan, r
�S /0 �Q• ��/// �C? fro.- ��✓ Jd.,r6.• t��.�!/d� Cp✓.,� lj rr�a✓dd �orrirrread ar!
Y ?animal waste application and handling ewpment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as par. of the plan.
Z] Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/ycar); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping s}•stem contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have bean provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: l%l J 1C C�
Address(AQencv): c Phone No.:
Sicnature: Daze: 7
The foliorFinn signature block is only io be used hen the box for conditional apprati•al in
bove hasn checkeertihat I (we; have committed to purchase the animal waste application andling equipment as
specified to waste management plan and will submit to DE:vt a verif n of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specie ' 15 calendar days following the date ied in the conditional c_ 01cation. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this tionis a violation waste management plant and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: -
Name of -\I
—kif different from owner):
Sisnat tyre: Date: _
E) Odor ontrnl. Tnsect nntrnl and Mortality liana}ement t'SD. ST- INTP._RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the P!an have been installed. and are operational. The
monalitt• man_�-_ment system as spec:fied iri the P'.an has also beeri in -::ailed and s operational.
Nance of Technical Speci: fist (Please Print'):
A1'ftliation:
Addrr;sS,a •L s�
n;sturc:�
N
.- WC -- .lanuny. 1.

u
41- 19
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAID
September 13, 1995
PAGE 1
PRODUCER: BROWN'S
LOCATION: PO BOX 487
WARSAW NC
TELEPHONE: [phone]
28398
TYPE OPERATION: Farrow to Feeder Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 2000 sows design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or. groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial -fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5.tons per acre per year. with special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential -for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

l
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAL PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2000 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 14500 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2100 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 1.3000 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 3
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
1�5
3546
10
EMPOR 0-2%
BC
5.1
255
0
7.5
MAY-AUG
3546 IS JEMPORIA 0-21 BC 5.1 1255 0 14.9 11249.5
MAY-AUG
3546 13 EMPORIA 0-21 BC 5.1 1255 0 11-2.4 13162
MAY-AUG
3546 7 MARLBORO 0-296 BC 5.1 1255 0 14.7 11198.5
MAY-AUG
3546 6 IGOLDSBORO 0-25 BC 5.5 1275 0 12.9 1797.5
MAY-AUG
3546 3 IGRITNEY 0-2°; BC 4.7 1235 0 16.6 11551
MAY-AUG
3546 1 EMPORIA 0-2o BC 5.1 1 255 1 0 110.4 12652
MAY-AUG
3546 11 EMPORIA 0-2915 BC 5.1 1255 0 1.9.2 12346
MAY-AUG
OCT-FEB
3546 SG 1 150 0 14.9 1245
OCT-FEB
OCT-FEB
3546 1-7 1 SG 1 150 0 14.7 �235
OCT-FEB
3546
(1
�SG
1
10
110.4
1520
OCT-FEB
3546
-11
SG
1
Q
150
19.2
1460
OCT-FEB
3546
SG
1
Q
1-6 1
150
12-.9
1145
OCT-FEB
3546
SG
1
0
1-3 1
150
16-.6
1330
OCT-FEB
TOTAL 17199

WASTE UTILIZATION PLA3x
PAGE 4
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
lay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAT,
PAGE 5
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
BC
SG
LBS N
CROP UNITS PER UNIT
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED TONS 50
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED 2-io3 AC 50 Aj
ixri �a:
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
TABLE 1 1 58.5 1 17799
TABLE 2
TOTAL [ 58.5
*** BALANCE
17799
13000
-4799
This number must be Jess than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 2200 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 6
Scc attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.6 feet of the top of the dike.
I£ surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLA1.. PAGE 7
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10„000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either has owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff.leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste -may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface wasters,
drainageways, or wetlands•by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.
PAGE 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 9
NAME OF FARM: #19
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: BROWN'S
SIGNATURE:- � �� DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
p ease print
S IGNATURE : S'4 "'L'7-- q, 5 Ck 40 ��("'_ DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: chuck
AFFILIATION:
ADDRESS
SIGNAT
( AGENCY) :
URE : �� _ ATE:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name --:Brown's of Carolina #19 County:Halifax
Mail Address -:Warsaw, NC
Type of production unit----:Far-Feed
Number of animal units-----: 2000
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :Irrigation
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 14693 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 13000 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: ' 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Soil Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3546
10
EmporiaB
5.1
50.00
7.5
1912.5
MAR-OCT
3546
8
EmporiaB
5.1
50.00
4.9
1249.5
MAR-OCT
3546
13
EmporiaB
5.1
50.00
12.4
3162
MAR-OCT
3546
7
MarlborB
5.1
50.00
4.7
1198.5
MAR-OCT
35046
6
Go B
5.5
50.00
2.9
797.5
MAR-OCT
3546
3
Gt B
4.7
50.00
6.6
1551
MAR-OCT
3 5 4 6
- 2
Go E,
6 9-F-JUNS -S-N
3546
1
EmporiaB
5.1
50.00
10.4
2652
MAR-OCT
Total
56. 8
L3$9-2:' . -7,. i
Available Nitrogen
(includes commercial)
134800.,
Surplus Or
Deficit
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tans
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
W=Wheat-bu.
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tons

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
1.0
Prepared by: r,! ;r.i' ...�� Title:`/ �•.�r f./;-Date:^''• :'';`.
i
Concurred in by:
oducer
Date: �r �- l
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
Date: ~S-�
Producer
Technical Specialist: �� Date. J

1 •4b y �,
41,
- .� �i1'. _� a ... -.,1 y-- •:.��� rye; F i. f1 � �• # .ia�:'-��• n."
'•/t {r s � •�`i;"v�'-r�;i�yF,'r � ��: ;ice .� _ � - _ .�
ji• 1 _`ti� .•:' _ :\'i
7:7-
' r�'� •I' y� (/Er�� ' .y l � :.-.� �7 �i� �. ��• t y' • Jr •� jam_
r
.Ca ^F- r-' _ :�.: ,r: 7. i. �V_ � � r� yi�/r. � • 44 'f-•,���^.;C �14s1.'� -
f tea.- - CC�� •• +� 1 b'c'`_ -..•r j:
_r `+ � »Ifff � � - -� r •tom _:,J�:
� it •.�i. +•-1•r �\ � � -�4
L:i:` r air-.r'• q � t } t- � � c wr � •1 •-s �.__ r

Oft"'
m

NRCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAIN SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift. manivade conveyances, direct application, or
direct cLs `arge during operation or land application. Any disci ar•,c t1r%Vaire %Vhieh reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer zither owiis or has a notarized agreement for use
of adequate land oa which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, be/she sha11 provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure as update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change its the operaiton, increase in the
nuraber of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of inaiiagement, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be 1l,Cd rn lidU of realistic-vIeld tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Aairzal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that
is eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acrea per }•e;u• providing truss filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Sail?�)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking a.ier wiste should not be applied when
there is danger of dr;l1 from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be Soil inccn l)orated on conventionally tilled
cropland. Whz:i applied to cots:: ation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided use
application does not occure curing a sewn prone to flooding. (See "Wlnealhc, and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rare such that runof:'does not occurs off --site
or to surface waters and in a method wrier does not cause drift ti-otn rliu sire durnnc: nl.plicntion. No por:ding should
occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall evetlts. or whell (lle surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a nratu:cr [liar the crop is not covered with waste
to depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt datnn.<< 1111111 ;rltitnrll tti'crste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring platacd crups fire soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nuts sent loading rates on these soils should be held ro a mirimunn and a suitabie wirier cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied aw c [i:,ur 0 days pritrr to planting of a crop or
forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or aPer October 1, 1995 shall compiy «'it!r the tttllowins: The outer perimeter of
the lard area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon drat is a cunipunet of a ziwinc farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential prope ^: boundary and from any percanial strearu m- wher- than an irrigation ditch or
canal. Animal waste other than sulne-waste frorn facilities sited on or after Qctohcr 1, 1995, shall not be applied
close. than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may be re:lLLCCJ that are 110t perennial provided
adequate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard 19.1 - f ilrer Strips),

MRCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAIN SPECIFICATIONS
(COivTINIMD)
12. Azimal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dweliir.__s orhei• than those mvne� by landowner
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other props:}' and public riuht-o -ways.
1 S. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainsgcways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Aairaal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste applied on grassed watcu-ways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from.washdown facilities, toilets, sinks, etc., shall rot be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vdgetation will be establishe:i on all disturbed area, (iaecon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, tc prorecr the vtgctatium Vz._tation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where ccmisidered appropriate. L_goon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should he in:�pectod regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the o%;-ner is re;;pomsible for obtaining any! implementing a "closure
plan' which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdo% s,
leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kepr oii siE�:.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetalbles and other crops for direct human consumption.
However,'d animal waste is used on crops for direct humat,. cmi:,uuupEit)n it slnitild only he applied preptant with no
hlr4her applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Eg:Jy visible permanenet markers shall be installed to mark d,e top and boc'mal elevations of the temporary storage
(p zmping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping sliall be n;anaeed cc) Iliahitau, !tie liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maxilnuE,1 :ioro:"c Volume 4"or waste ;tcrage ponds.
22. SoiI tests shall be made every year, and a liquid waste analysis .Ball be rAtn within 0 days of application
eorsis,ent wi_i: waste utilization plan. Poultry firer shall, be tcstc4 pric,r n} jpplica-6on. S�iil and waste analysis
records shall 'be kept for five years.
Dead animals will be disposed of in a maiu,er thaE inucts NC' rc_ulations

tMortality A-latiagenmil. \•tethods
(Check- which method(s) arc bk:1112 implcrncntcd)
D Burial three feet beneath the surface of flit Yground within 2-1 hours after
knowlcd«e of the death. The. burial must be at least 300 feet trorn any nowin!
stream or public body of ►ti•atcr.
penile; in�� at a readering plant licensed untie: G.S. 1 Ob-163.7
Complete incineration
In flit case of dead poultry only. piacinR in a disposal pit of a size and'dcsign
approved by the Department of AiTriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Slcurcc ('uuse llllll's tit C11111111 Insects Silc Slcccific' Pracliccs
Liquid Syslctos
1:111A Collol • Accumulatmtt of solids
I.a1;ouns and fits Cucsled Solids
vcuclalivc l}ccuyinl; vecclalion
t itowth
❑ 1:I11sh syslcnl is designed and ohcralcd
suflicicntly to rCOMM; .Icclonkshitul solids rrotu
I;nllcrs as desiglied.
❑ Itemove bridling of accimmialul solids ill
ditir.har�c
maitltain h1goous, sclllictl; WS11IN anti Mils ► helc:
pest breeding is apparutl lu mirtitrticc the
ci-1151illl; ofsollds to it dcpllt ofno more Man G -
8 inches over more Ihan 70% of sm face.
tvtaittlain vCudativc collllol along hacks ol,
lagoons aml other iu1lsou11ENICnts 141 I1fCVt:111
accumnimioo of decaying vcl;cltllivc mallcr
aloot; walci's edge ou imhotimintcol's petintcicr.

jwine Farm Waste Management Odor Con(rol ChoddIst
Cause
BrAl's (1) Millilkli"r.c. 011111- Nilu Spri-ifir
Fill
!Iwilic 11141thiclioll vecclalln OF
I(cc om loclidul I)CS1 mallap'llicill placlicc.,;;
Gocidjudgincill ;Hill C11111111011 Sclirle
Aitim-al body mufaccs
4 filly mallill C-comcd allillials
1)( Dry lloon;
0 wul- 11taillitc-covelcil Illmls
Slolld IIqloI.-;;
Walcicr-, lipualtil over slollud Ilomr;
0
Feeders al high call orsulill Hums;
Cl
ScIalle Illimille buildup hool flools;
1.1
Undcl-floor miliblioli for drying
himillic clillcoilill llits
t 11 inc;
F]
Ficilticill 111411UN lCilloval by 111101, pil leclial-cc.
• 11.11lial miclullial deconspalsilion
or Scialic;
it 11111 C'XilatiA fiIlls
Volatile Laws;
Fall Illaitilullance.,
Dusl
lifficicall air lliovclllclll
Dusl
-W,
wilsildown Ildweell giolills ol'allillmlso
Fctdcr uivers-,
Cl
-y dumiqwIll exicitilus In kcilcr
I cell deliver')!
Agilaliml. W'iccycled lagooit
Cl
Fimal lank- clivels;
liquid while lailks aw lillilil;
El
ExInIll fill line:; to lical loullillo 4II'laill's wills
.1111i -.sillholl
1- 111511 alkyl.
Aj;flalion duriul; wasimatcr
1-1.
Wildcl floor 1111sh wilh 111111cl I Illur veillilal ilill
colliveyallix
Iwilds
(dic-cycleal lalmm
i.1
I :A Icild I uchal I"t; finc..; III nl:ar 1JI11143111 III' IIIIS
lifillid while pi(S are fillillf.,
Will -.1111 i -Si 11111111 VC111%
I.ill NI'diow.
• Agiialion diiiiiii; somy umL
1-. 1
,)*ltllll3 will, cliver;
fillilig ;pill Illawilown
111;1ill LUIlUlitill
Aditalimk dmiiig wastmalcr
El
Ilux covets
Ahlr IC - Mimmilici 11. 1996, P-.igu 3

5unrcl: Clulsc ti 1111.11's lu 1lllniulitr. I)Ilur � _�----�—� �.ile';llrrilir l'1 ari.it�r:-_
I'lid Ordwinpiltcs .11 Al;ilalimri luting waslt:IP;11Cr C.I Exicild discharge pninl I1f Ilipt;s 1111ticinualit
lal;ntlrl cnnvcyallix 1:11;0nn lilplid level
L;lt;tl4ill 51111i1CC5 • Vu1i111it: oils CInIS51[mSi 1'111fICl- laglllnl Ililllill Ci111aL•Ily; �----.---�--..v. �-------�---.------
• Biological mixing; Coll-ecl lagoon ;li illlll Illoccilnrc:;
• Al;iialliln
Ivlilillln1111 titlrf;tCG;11L';1-UI-VuI11I111; lillln;
Miilinlum agilalioll MIC11.11nmltillg;
I_) Mechanical a aliull;
f I I'lovrn hiu1111;ical addilivcs
1111g:1111111 %ills 1.kr •
I11g14 flll'1SIIIl: agllalllllh
11ricalC till l!l-y days with IiulC Ur litl xvilul;
nou..1cs .
Wind Ill ill
fvlinilnunl Icconunclulcll operaEing plcsmut:;
c
1'11111p inIA.C. licar l;1g111111 hipl111 Sill Face;
n
11111111) rloill sCcond-clage lagllml
-
illlal;C 1;1111: Ill basin •
1:1111id 1n1C101161 41CCI1MIMSllnlll-
l.I
111111RI1i Ill. millICVC1 lumIilig; -
Sill last: .
Mixing whilt: filling;
r)
Ti111I: CI1VL'I5;
•
Agilalilln when c:inplying
n
11asill Surface mils Il['s1lllils;
C)
I'111VC11 Ililll4l;iCAI a11111INCS fir IlxithillS
�C11II111; II:1S111 S111li1t •
i';nlial 1111crullial ticcompllsilif.m.,
Irl
—
I:x1Clltl diaillpipc uuIIC1S llnllcincalll liquid
•
it'lixillg whilC 1111ing;
ICVLI;
•
Agilmian when -emptying
t 1
.ltclnnvc sculc{l 5ulid5 Icl;ul;Ally
Itlaimic, Slnlfy 11!shldgc •
Ahlialin11 1v11C11 slllcading;
n
Soil injulilln III Still i"yl'ililt Igcs;
)pie:;ide r millcis •
`Jlll;lllll: g;ls L'lllissiun5
n
Wash ICsilhl;ll malillit: II'om .-,plCaller alter use;
n
I'lowlt biolol.,ical;Itlllilivcs or nx111 ol1
1111covc1cil ill;ll1l11C� •
VldalllC g:15 clllissiolls whilC
n
511i1 ill;cCliull t11'511111)'�S111t1gC5
shirr)- or sl idge Iltl lichl
(isyilll;
r]
Suil hicurpcirali n 1vidi111 -111 his.;
a
Sl11 �cl.S
n
SIMCild ill 11141 I111i1ill'Ill I;Iyt l.'; for 1a1,ill dl)'ilig.
El
I'lllvcn hiologic;ll addilivcs nl- tlxill;lills
Ih;ill ;nliucll, (';uc;lSs dcLulllposilinn
�Ih:;Iel auilliill t1is111t..a1 - Cm dcr.gmpusiliun
pile
`I1n:iu1:1:11nI; • )lu:tln+p1c11:1:onlilusli1111
r� I'1{l11Cr 411spn5111Ui1 ii1 hill l:;l:;a::;
El C:omplcll: covl:liilt; of calua: a:: ill llnlial fill:;
C) I'l-oper local innlcullAttit: Ililt) tl1*l1kpn:;a1 pits
f'I .;t:cnnllary slack 11uln�ts
A4�iCti(: - 1.1uVC11111t:r 11. 1996. 1 arc -1

5nnr'rc Cutut 11N.11's In 141initnFr.c 01111e — Silt_Spevilic 1'raclit�cs
Standing miler atonnd lull}rotter drainage: !t Gratle and landscape such Ural water tlraiirs
lacililic� IYlicrtdtial decurlllrOsition Of away from 16161ities
organic matter
Alamrrc lrn:kt:d Onlo Poudy mainlaincd access roads Farru access marl mainlenancc
public roads Iinlu f nin
.access
Atllfilional Infommlion :
Swine Nia mrc Management ; 0200 Ride/llM11 racket
Swiuc Prutiucliun Farrtr Potential Oder Sources and I(CmediCS ; MIAG Fact Sheet
Stvinc i'rtultrction Facilily Manum Maitagcmcnt: Pit Recharge - Lopou Trcallnatt ; FIIA1- 128-811
Swnit: Nuth3cliutl Facilily Malone: Matingonuil: Underfloor Flush - Lal;oon Ti-calm of ; EIIAF 129-88
Lagoon Design and Managcnicul fur Livestock Mlamirc Trealutcol and Storage ; EIIAF 1113-83
Calibraltnn (if Maelnrc and Wastewalcr Applleatlnn Equilnlma ; ERAli Fact Shcei
Controlling Odors from Swine Iltrildings ; 11111-33
Unviranmental Assurance Program ; NPI'C Manual
Oplions fir Managing Odor ; a rennet Irons lltc Swine Odor Task Force
Hidsanct: Ctrticems in Animat Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PROIU7, 1995 Coufert ucu l'roccedill'Us
-Available From :
NCSI I. Culutly ExIensiuu Ct:lllt:r
14CS0 - BAI?
NCSII - IIAI:
NCSI I - IIAE
NC'SII - IIAI:
NCSIJ - 11AE
NCSII - Swine Lzteusiml
NC Pmk F'rutlnct:rs Assoc
NCS11 Agri Colmmulicatinns
Fltuid:l COOlrcruivt: EXICrt5inn
Altl()(; - l'lrtveteelUX 11. 1976, Page 5

LAGOON MARKER
�--- FREEBOARD + 25YR%24HR STORk
IAXIMUM 'LIQUID LEVEL
�-- 6 MONTH TEMPORARY
STORAGE
IINIMUM LIQUID LEVEL
'ERMAN ENT STORAGE
-�-

ENMRGENCY ACTION PLAN
PL4Na NI -n, SERS
D�VQ
EtiLRGE�CY;VL��+:�GEy�i`(T SYSTEvi 9I I
StiVCD
114,0,,CS cDS O--5; S 3 -3 VI j—iSh:n j Cru-/c-04,` x_
hzis plan w;Jll be i,:,ciecen_ed in the event tl at wastes Liam your operation are leakin&
cve:-2ow..z, or running of site. You should not wait until wales reach su. act waters or leave
your propery to consider th --t you have a problem. You should make every, effort to easure that
this does not lzppen. Mis elgn sh=ld be in aC Acc-:2sibbe lacaticZ for all emalovees at the
faciir�. The fallowinj are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release ofwa-zes. Dependirz on the sitaticn. this may or may not be possible.
Succested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A Lap=a ove:t2aw—possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to be.^Z to increase elevation of da.,n.
b. Purn.p waste to nelds at a&--i acceptable rate.
C. Sop all flows to the Iagoon ia-nrnediately.
d. Call a purnpirg contractor.
e. MZke sure no s-ufzce water is entering lagoon.
B. Runcff con waste application field-acticns include:
a. L:.:��e: Lately stop wassY appiicauan.
b. Create a ternporzry diversion to contai:t waste.
C. Lncorporate waste to reduce rsno".
d. Evaluate and eluTEnate &,e reascn(s) that caused the runoff
e. Evaluate the appUca_ion rates ,`or the fields where rtnor occurred.
C. Lea`:s e E-om the waste pipes a:nd sprinklers -actions include:
Z. Stop rec fcle pu::.p.
b. Stop lr iizaticn purr;p.
c. Clcs- to eam—mate %:l Lie~ dischc p.
d. Repair a!I le=.ks prior to rzsta gins punps.

D. Leakage f em flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Scop recycle purnp.
b. Stcp ir-igation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Scop alr1 flows In the house, flus:~t systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Lez.L-_ge corn base or sidewal of €agoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
lefts -Possible ac ion:
a, Dig a small well or ditch to catch 0 seepage, put in a sz:bmersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon. .
b. L holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
cornpact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the =,ent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any dar^zge noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did t:.e spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surace waters?
f. Couic a fixture rain event cause the spill to reach sur<ace waters?
g. Are rouble wa.er wets in danger (either on or oi<oFthe property)?
h. How much, reacted surace waters?
J. Cont=.c=prcpr':ate agencies.
a_ Du inz norr,7al business hours, call your DWQ (Division oFWater Quality) regional ofifice;
Phone-M-211-'1201) After hours, emergency number: 2�0`009"99Your phone tail
should include: your ra=e, facli:y, telephone number, the details of the incident fi'om item
2 above, the exact location o►` the 'facility, the location or direction of movement of the spt`iL
wezr`,er and wind conditions. The car, ective measures tliat have been under take;z: and the
s ncusness of the situation.
b. L spit leaves property or enters sumo: waters, call local EMS Phone number 911.
c. EMS to contact local Health Depart.-nent.
d. Cor.=" CES, phone number `5g3-516 1 , local SWCD ot5ce phone number
-5�13 3t1461 , and local +'RCS orrice For advicVtechnical assistance phone number.
4. li none oL'the above works, call 911 or the She: if's Department and explain your problem to
th"z ar,:. 2sk t 'zt person to contact toe proper a,pncieS For you.

F
5. Contact the contract ofycur c erica to begin repair of probiem to mini a off -site damage.
ROWW i I it
a. Contractors Name: .
b. Cor.tracors Address:
C. Cont-ac:ars Phone:
6. Conti Lie technical spe^zis` who cc wed the lagoon (:MRCS, Consulting Eng;nesr, a z.)
a_ Nance:
b. Phone:
7. InpIa meat procedures as advised by D WQ and technical assistance agencies to rec::fy the
damage, repair the systern, and reassess the waste management play: to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.

;
' SIT EVALUATIOM REPORT
I N
I!!
f rodu cr Count I �; {
'` ''" Da tc
TyPc 3 n,d Si zc tit or,
1'
Z000 oc..J i �A,Q,�ocJ' L-EcpE,el Cry
.ir
"'. 4toErPATica-r
S/ ram^ f _ Nw o %f�Ony }'PcAGE , SI i E a� Z ,Nc. A
EycacE ,51 03
Sc... J ob_ CL ass.
Lh sr•?nce to the Nca'rst Resi dencc Other TbaeiI
04uncr
or Pub! i c f3ci ( i t :
rc' cf
Z
ncc ro rac1 ( S_!r onccr ma to SaarcCs: II
f -'I • s
Y3 Trd C edss-ili C.?-ti Ci7
I
.
.>,i Tc- c ist 3 Q.. .4 Z4,e p dZAJr/F1C..,7t{
is
4�
:
Nousr r' r facr
i [
Ji.
�
L. 60o. �l.nCJ aAIL �u/Lt%/.tJ�f I I
Tv L.
6
;.tiJ
tt E,u T ��lC C 4 v q r/n Aj 11
y 5

SIT£ EVALUATION
A All
Lans! ?!!-:a tr n0 ofnacres aver (a6Lc
`7 50 .V G R E s 7o 7-4 L. i Cho P LA ti U AYM I L
3EvG44 N�dp2Ci1 li+ rL �1' W/LL gtF QLACFIj ;j i dGuE, ' ANY a
Usste Irrrg3fiOn £autiment.
!QEEr... 1100e,
der m,
uC
Summg of Soil Inve'�r.�'*3fion
.5 17 F �t �cr`idN s�ilsn��r� w gTE,e
I 1 !
Pe To 3 s.' ' ��'F�.�s Q 3L i1ya: PST
-,-t•rl Z- AfPe=ayes J/ndj.i
AWS Cr.+ :s c: j cc M4TL- -C,AL "r�r+tPoRA !'I o.e4Lr ; e3E AQsv�
i I y
Ew*(3A..LCA+�NT
,.l n
c: 4 4 .rar ri%A T+r.e r/,1 L
i �. �.�.���' •.� is ±,1 j ! j
C. Cem
JEr�Ir.efr�y s:oi'Ac� To E AE3Jvt St 4ro,udL �!� i�1�.T�!e Tg6W
E . iv i ;
i '�' I.
IF F E,eM CA SW `. Ali MAW L is ♦al
To E C�ixPA'aTG)P�AG>`
So ! t_a_b l � r o f � c � < � f_o r s +a r n e o .v_e'r a
- - tir o n
5I7'E A/c. 1 /t it.arS .Q2 ►(_on<n+.6;'NAED �0+2 lao�,�J c3"/TE E3EC,dujE
i
r7 F' .SP .'•;4 72eLrrt L C j : n DEPTN, k1li f1 [,S A'iErC �AaLE I G'A t" a AoloL , q iti3
F4.o, D PLA;.0
, I i
.S1 TES No Z 7 j 4 4r' 2 7e CaE Ged9 r'':Z �i': 'a A-1 .::,7I-r-
k ��

Jill
Xrz
` a .`'
�^
66
/ bL,/ /, /.1 � ,yw�.5G'��I:t r �Y'1t.. :i ��t�" h i ,�;j sh��' r�„`I✓� .;tY,`�.� f ' �JCrr +_'�0: \11.1", r �1a 9& '�1U�� �,� f/ �
II �; �� Gro a
'Sr �l. /�J:;s�`I��'•-.•i. _3���1 ,�:}. '/�'`100•, �.Y:. 'L��'=G:\rr ��\" >��r li !r, ;,'', � �_r. .�,''I .�'' �
ZZL
•{�,, �' e- +ti r � r r t , � `Ltd .�, `�� t• � u ; 3 �i� "
;j y: ,r 03�,, ;�� , J✓N�� ����� f��` 1• '.� , f �� �T�
If
%• altr-1 4• v�t�J / y �0 � � 4 ry'�.° r0 :I ,k � t.` � \J t r � !!
1 ty,,. J d•`1,'' 'f, 1�\, � _ i �' r! " a' r,Ia Wr .r�:L'r �. Jl J /'
r 9
ke
'"1� f I 'i /* 1. iy'� `I 't ''4 ' n 7r i� I !J : i r�.L-j'''-1}n -neas
4 pb i1\ G I v�r • � ��'�'� r'�;' �• �� s�l�ly `\1 ti ( 0.��� � `� 1 _l'h.'. .. _. .. „ `.
�" / / / 1� r1 l���,� �. �i` �•�_ ;. '�1 wry �/ 4 s Q': ;r •r�-•. .. � � r
•.�,,R�'�J�1!:„�, � ��` •; loo
C.' �} � ..� � •� -� r P� � r/ r r 1 -SI ��\` �� �a• 'Qi - T��s �. r r � ■ .�'.'� � r/
41
' -- ' '- �/ r �i. I .{ '� '•r �y.•. 1'� "+, ". / ' �`.,::�.. •�rEr it `'�IC i�'L1. r t . 00 1�
�s0 y i�>? ¢ r - sl- � � ° 'r,.' 'r•t� ' 97 a .ti s v-� '-'�, a�• ' ���
� .s• \�- f ",q �a, �� 't ,,�. 'a ! /4' �. �As}lLew. � u . r:� � �d ,1, f '-/ � /' j .\
too., ..
r �_
60

I
`
t
rl„r
I I
SJTE'I EV A LI�A?'JON +XPOJPT
rr I.
I I•7,to
l
�
Producer:
I ;tC'o
el•'y,
JYt,
A
I - i tt.ii li=I 4f fl.'
r1,t
i
I
I
I
T c aad Si:e:4
allioR.
r
4'
Sire Jl l - n/w CF
and
�',[aeE
of
SCS ,lob C 1 a s s
I
I
rt1
�i
Di std.RCCt0 the
cal
stl Residence 0th`Cl''T�{t
.`."Ord
PUbfl
r
S/�E -.� -7 �.��.
Y I
I ' •'I �! .�11
I
r` 77
t IIII
it l!. I''
,5'
'
i }i -
.>;-
4
�E,•+
'°'a'i;.
S17
ri
I
I I
} _ r
ft
.c.711 7 Iz
''iI,�
I'-il'
�'
,.•{�
'
-a�
`3i�l.v;r;
Distanec; to well.,
ca
other !wattr
sau!rc'cs'!'�=,
I;Y
I'i�rk�l'''�y1'��
1—.111
kl
2
S1TE5 ��i ,3
T
s I
; D,o ; �
11 1 1
I ',+;�I.
Yazard C1 assi i c a
t i
I
it 11
I +'
�;
I t+
'
4•}
L��I+ii�p`p
�Fj-•�ji
`
�(
Z
r
L4o.
Nousr asy Fa crl i ty:
Li..ri`ii+
I}
II I
Y'�I}oE
La'yoot� S cci fi cs,
I i 1 s
l iII 1
';�w
33
�;�
_'
,'
,]{jj{Ir�Tt�'
7
j
'� I
�y JC/—
J / 0
PA e 7 i.a 4 E�tB.q.N
11►i E+� T /SIG
CA PA:
1. 1 , -�
•I I !�� -
I � 1'
q
�f
1"•I.Iti,r,
.
:J
R'.
:DA y 5 i i
I
,;,
to
,
I
11
n
ii
cry
,ti
I
,I i.{.,<
,
at
I
,
J
�•
it I•� „� {
�
1 r.
Ippr r `
E
Facil'i
1 ;' r
[ i
i
J•1
�9� I
I
•I
: z
r, ;
1•
,
S
I
F , I
I
,
II
II .

(:S1TE-.EVAL4VAr1OiV RE
.1 Land A i ca ti on of I
E:-c 7"o 7 50 ae
!� I iQcE� . `t�'PE
is
c- rm is Re a u i red:
I-JALI,CAA ' r_Ou
0 'So i I
/V
CII sc. Item,,.
TO-
.i':Sui tab i I i ty of si e.
bj— jrp A44T�,eiAc-
JF4mob PLAIAJ o
-51 TES
2
04 �
CeoA-jD A.-0VR'
Ii '��j�
(-4 W A
IYA .74
C 4. Ai ot,r 9 iA L —
4 rex; -
14
A &A Oiw-
14vz: A
I -AA TeX tA. L
To du �.
.4 CA PA;
for s O.D c e a!t P O'n
'Of dF
T17
I .
�k!llq: w g
m
j.
15
I
il

S W I N E L A G O O N D E S I G N
Operator:
S&CrT UURK1k /
County:_
��-,FAx_
-- _Date: s -�z— 9z
'5,Mt T [+5%eL_P
SIYE -3
PRCV45r­o 4'�__
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): ,�Ea� � feet
2sw FE�f
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
saws
(farrow to
finish)
x 1417
lbs.
= o lbs
z000 saws
(farrow to
feeder)
x 522
lbs.
- 044aati I b s
head
(finishing
only)
x 135
lbs.
= o lbs
o sows
(farrow to
wean)
x 433
lbs,
= o lbs
a head
(wean to feeder)
x 30.lbs,
= o lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = ' u4A-000 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = loh A000 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)Ilb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)Ilb. SSLW= �'o CFllb, SSLW
Volume = to 44000 Cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = o cubit feet
ovdNFP—. J'�4 s�ur�c,�� STo�AczE. Sc�u�ca� w�L� 6�
i-F-MOvEo AS. µrector j>.

4, ` TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 43V feet ; Inside top width 412 feet
Top of dike at elevation q 4to feet
Freeboard i -_ feet ; Side slopes 3 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation -7z•3 feet _
Seasonal high water table elevation -7!�'•ce feet
Total design volume,using prismoidal formula
SS/ENDI SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
(AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH w
?, a 3"t 1,� ; I z s t ( AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH 4
39 g. 9 -7 3, 9 = t 4 ( AREA OF MIDSECTION 4 )
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] DEPTH/6
1 r° -7/cg 'i539L S98o`)Z r 2s�r �-
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 1b03 s -7o CU. FT.

5, TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike) .
:.Length * Width
g3e �u= = tea 45L square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water) :
Length * Width =
square feet
TOTAL DA = I b o4r5( - Square feet
Design temporary storage period to be ►e o days,
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CFILB SSLW 0.00136
Volume - Jo.44.0oo Lb5, SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day $o days
Volume = cubic feet
19 P��.PC�S, l- �.nT Wtt.�► 1yoT' DR4iy ro L�4C�oa�.

a iolume of wash water
�L...,_ ,
r - This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = gallons/day o days storagel7.4$ gallons
per CF
Volume = a cubic feet
;5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
I to days excess rainfall - r3 inches
Volume = 12 in * DA 112 inches per foot
Volume = s + cubic feet
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour Storm
Volume = (0,t inches 1 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = -to z.zsb cubic feet
TOTAL. REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
2-55s-71 cubic
feet
59.
�. o - - cubic
feet
5C.
_ r.��4�4--Cubic
feet
5D.
�02.2s _ cubic
feet
TOTAL_5eF- 3Z3 cubic feet

rAuz )
6. SUMMARY
Total rewired volume IS 9 7323 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. iT,Tz o cubic feet _
Min, req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation o O0 o cubic feet
At elev. -79. (.s feet ; Volume is 04k`toao cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is I4 9 so s cubic feet
At elev. $ z.37 feet ; Volume is t 4950(a5 cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation 7 4.�o feet
7. DESIGNED BY: �L�I��C-' 7 �i��-W� P.�. APPROVED BY
DATE: $^ +2- 9-�-- DATE:

n. o -y to o In rl -p
(IF
fu :A 11, -Q -y O -.
a� C.
(n f = to s (A
[n
O {p =,, fn I
C�0 o-
x. n,
�•O C ti ui R, [n
n As r-y
nlnr,nn[n-o ��
(p 411 Al 0 - { ) (u
n - 1 "0 r1 n- r( UI
n O (TO
�� in• n� c � a � n
1 n As (n n rj nr C)
Q I- f) n 1 Al ill n
'y IA -y f_ (1). IU r-1
As
(n
(n Ci' 00 n; As (n
_s (� u, --- Cis n
,I
r•0 C o
As 0 Al ] N � (D
-1 -1 S "0 ul(fn 1
n! {11
rp _
(D y it (ll rl (ll
mom(Afu(n
-< Al n! {p D.
I: (is Li
fnC
-, nI -uy
(n - As r1
(D;•
-'- '("I
fly (n "C.)
C (1) m 1
n. nl c.y
r1U _In_Ly0
C) _ RI n n1
Q 1n'';rl•i'i
-1(�-�;nlrn=n_
C) ,., O
(A s 1 .-1 n.
-1
r�0(r _,
-) -1 (� (I) (rr
{111 .1its A! -1" f i C
- — _... (D
O =
=1 (U -1
[n
(n
q,
t�
.nor-rnr,nl�n,R1
n-n' anl,1 ten!
r) (r} C,. < n
O rl C A' _
71 -3- n! 0 (n m (p
(;,fell,-y�n1�
in , C n.
Q (p n. —, fit
n _ (y n) (P DUlcy
in A fit
_ O C
-, (,
- ( , ID n. Q
ti iAsn'[n r-
As -1 rl — (.1 VI
U 0 0 "Cy Q Al �" n _1
pr (G AI nl (rl
- - n n; Its C -
(n —. n -(, Al (II ryr
o-
m(n- o _yc,n1
=. Ay n
r n. AsS ry 1�
At
QnoC)
7 , �c,
At a[ n C( n
(n - rl -n I (n l l (p
In rn Q At -. n AI .n
its { =1 fit O 0- -
R1 n c nl [n ns' ni C7
o n 1
C) R} r1 (- -" r, 0• Al
C)-' (li -rin o
_y n as (l) O (n
(1) fit As At n' Q
-• _� v -(a � ns -1 — O
( IT ni n Q -I n As
-((- ns u' 1 q�
(!!
n (p n- 0 It in O I-
R, r! _, to
al Cl - (� Ll s IT
A(1, (p (A
O (CI IL
Q o <
ln.t1 �1_[n0
- IA (p
to rf
(Il_ 1] n r( U
(i► N (-!• �
(^ U n+
t = 0- (n � Al n.
fit
—
•rn
rn
3 n. (Is n
0 (,
m
ni ns rn Cy n1
(n _�..rj-
(o 1•,
f_- n} 0 0 i
As
rU O In is
(h r,
In -� -U =1
Al
pl 0 if) Q n - 1
nt
O in O
3 m o
(11
0n fit D
x
fu _l ,.,
Q 1•4 - As
v .-, D
[(11s) � Q (11
ru r(
(n 0iU O c7. ^y•
At 3 'o fit
[Is A [n
m , As AI (l) �
n. (A -1, fn u1
. fu
crOQcn
[p tI r( 0 A
n1 I n-
(n O n = (:
(� [Uu a to
-�
nl n' n' In
fit rn I + (is =7
r n_ iu ((-I r1
rF Its
n'v C) m
n} (n -, m a- n- _s
-71 (n tli . v,
As R f.: fuss
At (Ss Al (1) n o Ell
nIa—tom(=u_
ns (l, C ('+ fit (n
in-
0 Ai (n f� v � 1
D1 !_!.
m (. - -C r1
cc) -s („ -s" m
rn(�ru
cu
n. -1 -o n n
0 1, =1- O
'i flr n' A)
-. nr frs C in O
Al -.
+ r1
41} Eh (n r1 r 1. v
_r lu
Its
(1) _ • 0 "C) =i 71
As } (o - 3 R, A]
[n C) Q [U 5
to Its fl, . , IT)u, . n I
.r 1 (s
f:1. rJ (A n1 -'-
n; 14 r ::! C) As
n (A
3 O AI n "1' A,
[p D O Al
'o -1 (u
it,(I, fs, U (CI
As
(f [1 A! In
i us (A O
ci• '= � n1 �
ns
C
.I7 nl
n
n �v (11 0
A, (a A, �1 •n
--I ,
As
in
r (I) A!
(n

OPEILkTIOti & NLA, TE-N --� ItiCE PLAAWN
Proper lagow. liqu,.d SnoLIC_ be a �'-i0L'G� L-7ii0'[` I: is espe---,llty
innpo:a:t to r;nnaw levels -so C=_ You do L,oc nive Pro''Olems eL'71-ig ex:elded r- rLy and
wet OeroC's.
_Nkf=-dr.;UrL 5:0"_"'_ capm y should be a` aillar,, b:e .n the lagcofor pe^ods winen C-le
r�Ce:Ving C 0.:� C�_...:�"_(5:._'.c5 'w"::L:e' "?e foc wine.': i e:e a:,-
ex nday .� A speUs suchas :he c'....nde mar... SwSCR 1: Ine.S4,TLL;,e:'11'e. Th-S Me: --IS
tna: a: the 5: Era _'S 0'. � _._ . 0' : n In the lamr W'ii::eN?eazi V s?nn.g 1:='__QC? according to
a fa_ . waste ,:._. `e n?e' plan Sl ot-,!d be done whenever the And is d:~" enough to
rCKVI! lagoon, Liquid. This will ,ra],:z s:crage space avallable :n the lagoon -or iL'mre; wet
pe:_odL In the la:e i`I me. lagocri should be pumped do` -n to the low
(see F_ _ :) c0 al.CW' for ywiliCt7 5tC?'-- Ever,' ...:Orr. SnaL!C be CiiGde to
the lagoon close to t`e ._::L m l.c:iC level as lor_ as the em-':er v.d waste
e
uaizat on plan:. w':-- glow' it.
ti'val_:g Lndl t"e lagoon: `as reac;:ed 1tS rnaXIMLM Storage Capaci:v before Si=�i1g to
Ilsgate LaeS not le:ve roan for StOr -c excess w_`r GL�ng ov•>arCe.cr per'_oCS.
O.""erEow f 'om die lagoon for any rerson except a 75-year, 240our Storm. 1S a 1dol"adon o
state law and SLbjec: to pena ty acaon.
7% rour ne r3`..cenance C . a Lagoon involves the following:
30ra_ncenamce of a vw_'Ca:-ve cover for the Cam.
Fescue OC t'C?mr-nan bee—M_C_ , S are the I:105t Co1rn - 0:, �'e?e':i�'e
covers. •ezet . o ..` yr. ezz seder to
CL ...-. L:le V T.. �. �:o�i �L:IJLIc be : -11� �: eGC:� �/�._, 1_ il�.....�r:,
r ainy'n a vigorous manC. The c-:QLnc of Ie7auze: applied. should. be
Base.-.. or a soils Lees; bL: in the event cha - l: is Ito,- ?acziC ' to ob: ain
a SOON tes: each yew, the lagoon and. SL"ounding a=yr5
s'nou'e be rer._.__ec w::` 800 pounds pe- acre of 10-10-10, o:
ar'd gees or the em'.b.a L :nen. CT'it_5t be Con::olieC. This r.ay be
Cone by ro`. ng'spraying,g=—.gig, Cl:c77i:,g, or a combina::Gn of
t lespyr.;c ups. This sha&( be to,--e a: leas: once a yta an C•
in 4'ea 5 ::'a: w'ea: Le CC'nd-- _ions are .a`iora'Ole fo
NOTE: I vegemAn is CCr•woUed by spraying, the hd iC ldt Rol be a.'LC'•.eC Co' enm-
the lagoon WOW SUCK CA;':!.:a!S COLIC: LIa ,�L :'e bacte:�a in t-e lagoCr, that c.=e t=e :_ a
the. waste.
ML:itenance mspe-.iams o` CA en..re lagoon SnOLld be rn:de d-yring t~« .r,i::_ -Tinge o=
the lagoon ant a: 'le::S[ i:C .' nC of:e" M-';Ci-Lai7..'.!1 1:7-d SCUM eVENS. 1 MS [o be
checked a i...i:i,i:�Tn, [he
Wasm Inlet Oes, Re' vc:.ry P'_es, a .d O"re7OCR Pipes —lock for:
1. S'.c"L:_. an Oi C;,n_5
b eah5
Sa:t5 0r r' n e 7 a I S
ove-_`.1, cc'rci_ or, o� pipes

Lagoon surKace---lOOk- for:
L. i:ndeSAble Vege-,.a-dve g-ow:h
2. I':Oa:-ng Or lodged debns
Emnban',u •enr --look f=
I. Se&e7.^.e:,t, C7a::'.&.,7, Or "jug" EiojeS
�. S:Ca S10,Je SL•-^._l_:V SiuT-?1 0: Cui-'S
�. I'E Or Lip veil On the back sWce
e7osicn due to lac'.{ Of v'_':__ot Cr as a res::l:Oi wave aL:iOn
r Cden t C--- :i:a9'
La:-'e. lagoons may be SubJec: CC line_ da-a=e Cue tO wave action caused by St_Cr•.g .
w':.C5. These Wa'yes can erode Ene l=zoon Sidewa-111s, t ,e:ebv wea'<e ;_ ~ the lc_GOn dw—L.
?k coed sand of Vege_.:Ors will reduce the poker:=al damage cau5ad by wave action. If
wave ac_on causes serous damage to _ lagoon sidew•L1 b'e.::i'ie5 in the la_oon ^"' y be
us,-C to rem, ce L,e wa`ie is —oaczs.
Any 0f these could lead t0 erosion and weakening Or the Ca:s. If your lagoon has
a.ny 0f &.esa fezoures, you should cLl as appropriate expert ie,':"ELZ u%i::11 CeSi1gc.r•d
coast_ uCtOn Y o' waste lagoons, 'You ii:ay need' CO pcovide a tenpor-an' fix if tlhe7e is a th-ea:
of a w'_sta disc :ar e. How'eve" a l:.erma.%w soluntoni should be reV,e,.ved. by the
Cec nicL e:toer : Any Gig=ing ii CG a lagoon dam heavy equipment is a senio s
underaking w:t i pOte.".:_O;i S.-Hous ccnse uenceS and should not be ccnductet unies5
:ecor:.Me::ce� by an propr'ate tech= ica! eXpZ77
WWI: p's^os---c'r.ec'.: for proper Ope __On ef.
1. r_cycu - Pumps
=. i-- ,ion pumps
Check "or le`:s, loose F.c-ir:gS, and over2,l puT:p Ope ct:or. An u us',la ly loud Or e-ndrin
note, Or a lu_e o i-ibraucn, may ir:GiCate Dial tr:e pump is in nee:: Or i-_ , or
rep!acemen...
tQ 7 _. P,,: -, nping 5y"S Vnould be inSpe..tz.. a:'.0 Gpz a�_...: .. L'e;:tly e::Cl:z:: 5e th"e.: VOu
c:4 --.CC CORp*.t:thl 'iwphsad" by e0 ipmenc ra:l'�re. YOU S':Gu1d p)e70 " VG�_r p�_.:ipi%g
5! Ster'; maRe"tc.^:ce a: a twe when vc��7 lagoon is at its to level.' 1 nis ti'i+i''..__ow Sonne
time si:eL'k+' C"ia;or C pairs C)z MQ,",7et. .=vitig a nea..y t l IwgGOI, is nCt the O:i:..
to :-_nk abou_ swixh�greoaih or berro%ing pumps. ASK,:-. is ycL;,- l_;oor is Full,
You: i�dthbOr ' s l•_gocnis iL l Lso. 'You should cor s"ddr an inven:,o j OF Spare
pars or pumps.
SuM= ewer civerslan fe =es are e.escr;e,� to ca., all s=ace
e-a:ra;t xarers Qc.^ as is n all rinoFt, ro0F dAmage Cuaer C1__ieCS,
ind paAnj lot runic':) a`vav f`Ori your lagccr. and C•t�e- t asze
cmawidw or Szora~ S=r .�t'Sr�5. The only w'a:!" G:a. Si-C'ule bt-
corm g Porn yourla won i5 Ct1p._ which Comes Cron, you—, f '_S`:i.
(washing) system pi__s and the raln.all Cna: hies thz! lagcor: ciret •y.
You shoWd l:'SPM YOU7 dNe:mon system for the iolickwi-`
I. acecua:e vegt!l=.ion
�. dive75icn capacit,;

Ider.d7ed probiem.s should be co-ecced pro rilptiy. I: is advisable to inspect your system
during or 1Lni7L.;'; !a:_:;! following a heavy rain'.. I-,-technicZ assistance is'needpd to
dete=dne psopd sotu- ?ons, con 'u'.c wi_i appi— pHace eCuZ~i.
You sc:0uld rt00rt the lz',el of the lagoon jest prior Co wh..en min is predicted ar.ci the.,,
record t2 a level ago_.. =:c 6 hours a_'er the ic_' (ass--mes there is ::0
give you z:, idea a: how much your lc_=oor; levy will roe w'ich a. G'.'rr'1:- r' =z_i1 l
u' i.'r (you L50 _e record::1g y'0117 r_._.�a!1 for C :is to work). K-:awing C :35 Should help in
pia=_. hng i:-- ___or appi-c=_.or:5 oral 5.0rsge. I' v0u: la_Oor, ,—_5es e.:Ce55iVely you May
have an. inf'ow probleal Wrl a surface water di eMon or che:e rniay be seepage into Lhe
lazoon. for, tie S=.ounc.n_ l_e :.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
1. Immedia:ely after conwocion establish a complete sod cover.or, bate soil
su_=aces to avoid erosion. +
Z. Fi I anew la_oor, design t=e:.tnenc volur;':e a: least ham: full of waor before
waste loading begins, =-Idng c`e not to erode lining or bar:_, slopes.
j. D:L pipes inco he lagoon should have a Flexible pipe exzendt7 or, the
end. Of t'e 00Z t0 0scha==e ne` the bocrom of une l=;oor, du-n i:'?ual
Wne ar ak" er Meads Of slowing the Lincorning wayCO avoid erosional of
the: Gins.
4. When eossibr:e, begin. loading new lagoons in the sp-+" to
bacceK esmbi shr:er (due to warme. wear —her).
5. I: is recom.mendef_' that a new lagoon be seeded wi.h sludge from a ire: Luny
w'or,kin swine lagoon in the arnounc of 0.25 percent OF the RAI !_goon
lice= d volume. This Seeding should occour lk>z L•ryo wee`s pnor to the
ackitioni of w=scewate:.
b. NEMnaGn a pe odic check on the lagoon liquid pit. I_ the pi Wis below
7.0, add l::i;e a. C[ie fete 0 1 pound per 1000 cubic It: of
lacoor, EgUid Lr:t l the p . rises above 7.0. Oo_ t mum lagoon liquid
PH is bec`.vetn 7,5 and 8.0.
7. Adak color, lark OF bubbling a ,,d excessive Odor Sig n`5
biolo_ical activicy. Consul_ on vich a tec*nriicz-1 is re-zo-'mmended
if C=e_e cord=: -.ors oczur Mr prolonged periodsr espeziailly d--.��nw t-e warm
Sez,on.
Loadiag:
Tne -L"Ore .-_ccenr'.Y Wd QgWa y that was.ewam is added to a la_oor., tn: be::.. tee
lagcon Will u.^.c::v ;. Fi'us, syscers t.`,a,- wa_<< wasce info tie la_cor!. se'fe.ri t:- es C`iy axe
opt:-u:�i ;0" tie`: e.".i. P:. Ce:f1r::�� sys:e is, in W; ic1 ore Or noiz OU:IC:'_s t7zina

Management:
Practice watercauservaEon---minimize building waver usage and
soilage ".Orr, leaking wa:erers, broken pipes and washdowri tniough
P Q:ee- 1T:c_rfenazce and water conserva-zon.
�:�_....�. :eed w'rC:ai' and scpMage 'by keeping fee—.e s aCILSZtd. lids
w._l ret_Ce t"e amou ._ of soUds enzarIg the lagoor,
T__..Nn lagoon Uquk level bztween the penrianenr storage level and
the i :l» te."r,pOrZ Y 5t07ag e level.
D!'-e visible rriai'Cers or Was On the lagoon bars t0 Show the
rni`inIU : liC'Ad We. and u e maxi.T:L«, liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Scar; i gaci _= an fie earliest possible date in the spi.r,g ba.:w or:
nu:-encreQu:_e.�:ent5 L-id soil rrioistLre 50 Lttat teTOors:--v smr-age
w':Il be rinaxim- i e rcr the Sumrier, tilunderstoL'it sea -son. 5imila=lV,
i-g-:e in the lave su:; mer/early fall to provide ra:irnur-, lagoa_ n
storage for the winces.
'I he lagoon HQ4 level mould never be closer [rian, 1 foot to the lowest
t;oi:,c c the dam, 'or en:ba:r,Icn,enc.
Do noc pump tie lagoon liquid ie`�el IOwe- that the �er.:�`ye^.t scocage
level unless You a=e~_e-moving Slud e.
T Oca:' float pump Lpp7 3XiMna:elv 18 inc,,es the Liquid
and as farGriG'i iron the di,_:rt7ipe inlets as possible.
Prever: aCCiGM 0 TF bedding M2.t=225, long -Stemmed forage Or vegMdOrl,
feed, Classic syrages, or ocher fo-eigri n; ace: as s inn the lagcon.
Pac'_endv remove soiids moil, ca•_ch basins at and of con Mement homes or
L":�1 z�%�: L:l��/ a:e instLieo.
1.1a1n ca n sty:ct vewe:zkon, rodent, and vanmin. concrol nea- lagoon etges.
DEC noc a110, trees or larp bushes to ?row on lagoon Car: Or ember' krrienz.
Remove sludge hom the lagoon eic!!er were^ t: e Sludge storage C:Dr.:�� is
}
l'_.l of beVe it Us 51 pe-CenC 0 title i e7-MGrld.nt S:ol:Lge 4Oilill.e. J
if prcC,_c:-.cn is to be ter ?i"S r=.,, t_`'.e 0,,V7,e: is rzpons::�:e for
cc_L7-'.rC and imi- ie'encing a Vosa7z plan :o eli-,una:e PCss;'OUir' OF a
Sledge Removal:
Race of l-:_o+:n s:--,d bL:lk�,op ``r, be rea'i:cec b.•.

prapv lagoon Win?
C"'.a'c-aniczl Solids c•i flushed w'asz�,
:-�' - - �-' i.
�'_ ." 5�c _ _ Oi r: S�:e 'w'a5:a 501id5 � an. die5icn,!.j. b"c..5i:'l, Or
::...._...._.'°' ietd w'as:Sge and spinage. lagoon sl_dge that is .remo 'ems
ha 'Ors odor, and
lno .a. land M Lrope '1 use the nu enu.
Removal Lech icues:
Hi-e a cus[om a---�lica:vr
Mix the fudge and lagoon liquid w-h a chopper-agi_:vr Ongel_er
pump [`_ougla_e-bore 5prin'_ter z-i;__vr. sys:tr1 onto ne—arby C.opla :C`;
and soil incogms-2.
Dewwr the upper aa_z of lagoon by i=.ga.ion or::o rea:bY C70pla~:d 07.
r-, x remz:n!n_ 5iudje; p1: 7 into l:e '.d sludge aODI_4a:Or; haul
and sprea : or:o'Cropla::d OF rora`_la:d; and SCiI incoivQ wca.
Dewacer t:e upper pa _ of iagoon by i- !-io . Cn[C i:ez.-rby c:v_C•!zziCj or
ioC=?'-iai?d: sludge Ham lagoon or sludge ba=_a; berm.
an a-aa reside lagoon to .-.....ve the 5IL!CCt so :Aa: LC' Cs can Vain back
into la=ocn; Llo,. Sludge Co de'Na q haul and. spread Spreader
On,o c-=,'.and Cr For_wa.=nd; and 5v^'_i
Regiadiess of the r-..'.:.;od, you ttl s, have the sludge r1_:an211 C�:wl V zed for waste.
MnSd=. e= ii_'S: as VOU `.•vOuld YOUR lagoon w:. V 1 e fudge ME contain dL:eren:
nu _en," a-..� mne:al from ,che l:Quid. The appl can:on Q::Ine. sludge to i e`ts Will be
United by these- a5 we", as 2:ny O-ZeVlcus waged =.ppica::ors [0 una: aid and crop
Cequi.-a,min.. Waste aOviica.ion r :.—s w:_. be discussed in de:_1 in Chacce; 3.
When removing $,uc_ You r;-;�.s: �:50 oa'% a[. ..iiCn ro t::.. I...... v prevent ca- Close
,. the
s. fine �w �il ensure th : the lagoon kner remains
a::aa:ion 0+ :i�.. pumper OC �.'. 'L .:... 0✓�''�:LC W, !: :�
Own If vet: see so:l r:.amr al or the K-'",[:'a:iC li::ar MZ—.-27ill b2ing C S ur:z�, �'OU S�:O•ui
stop the ac:ivir .. imetia-ti ' and not UnC.1 YCu Z:e Su': {'_. Me- 514 due can be
a •` "ti iu* i^a_ t e Her � 3r-^aged r : � repaired, as s on a removed W�: C � 1 .,.., i:".)l..": li [`t.. I•.,.., is C'....::�`..�: i[ Rli..S' Z t.. S
possible.
Siuc' e re:noveo : ,e la_ccn has a much h4her cnosor',ow and :zap-; me_l concen: _
chin liquid. Ewa. --,se Oi i 1s is snLO'_ C Lrobab;, `b3 apt'!..eC :o land PhoSpnC -S
and mnizLll a: by a SOI: [.'_J:, lnC MCOP':.'aNd CO reducethe Oawce OF
erosion. Nace chat is the sidge is a:O:!e'.. [C A& vti::','.e... �:: 5Ol!WS: PhOSP'r,areS, it
should be cpcilet: 0': _ a_ Caws GO :ne crop removal Oi nosp'nor_S. As W",- i CChe
wastes, alwayS haVe yCo QaCn ]i° g! Zna!1'L.'..d iO Ins
The apvl;,czOn O` OS','-1dg=v..11 increase the amount 0` odor cc L:,.' ,va::�' c�.l!C4: 0r, size. L
Ex a reca`. MOO 5�icdt be, LStd Cs. [J fl�.�SMe the wi dimcdon ant lear�^''` ichner
could increase [ e cor,.:ern or

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon f..ilures result in the discha,ge of wastewater fom the s=cture. Types
of r4u.es include lesk ,e t_hrouch the bosom or sides, overopping, and breach of the
Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has d-le responstai1lity for
e'Su-:Ii S ;Ct'='4 SZetV. Irems. which may lead to lagoon fzilures include:
Modi=ca=on of the lagoon exa-m-ple is the placement of a pipe
in the da n1 w,t:^.out proper design c:d con5m: +cuor�. (Consult `n exper 3.ti
lagoon des:=n be.,ore placing a=iy pipes in da-ms.)
Lanon licuid levels --high levels z:e a szfety z4sk.
Falure to inspect and main= -in the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during -sludge
removal, or rupture from lowe::ng lagoon liquid level below groundwater
L=bie.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the mavL-i,-- water, will soon cause
?'L!ies to form, Ln the dZM.. Once Lhis dz-image st:---z, It care quickly cause a l`ge discinazZe
of wastewate: and possible dam fai?ure.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR....CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON
Producer - SMlT Ff� s� oT'T
Clearing: All trees and brush shall be removed from the
impoundment area before construction is started. The foundation
of the lagoon shall be cleared of all trees, stumps, roots,
brush, sod, organic soil, and debris. All stumps and all roots
exceeding I inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth
of 1 foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris.
After clearing is completed the foundation area shall be loosened
thoroughly and roughly leveled, with suitable equipment, before
placement of any embankment material.
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated to a minimum
depth of 1 Z inches under the embankment. The exact depth shall
be determined on site by SCS. The trench side slopes shall be
1:1 or flatter and the width will be a minimum of 6 feet, but
will depend on the equipment being used. The cutoff trench shall
be backfilled with GIf material. The trench shall be
backfilled in 9 inch layers and compacted with a sheepsfoot
roller with a minimum of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift.
If sheepsfoot roller is not used, the trench shall be backfilled
in G inch layers and compaction shall be equivalent to or better
than the routing of the hauling and spreading equipment over the
fill in such a manner that every point on the surface of each
layer of fill will be traversed by not less than one tread track
of the loaded equipment traveling in a direction parallel to the
main axis of the fill. All standing water shall be removed from
the trench before backfilling is started.
Existing Tile Drains_ When tile drains are encountered, the tile
will be dug up and removed. The tile trench shall be backfilled
with a compacted layer of CL or CH material.
Excavation: Topsoil shall be stocked piled separately for later
use. The bottom of the lagoon shall be excavated as shown on the
plans. Where pervious material (SP, quartz veins, etc.) is
exposed during excavation, it shall be undercut and backfilled
with a compacted layer of highly plastic (CL, CH) material
approximately one foot in thickness. Scarify and compact the
bottom and, where practicable, the side slopes of the lagoon to
decrease the permeability of the soil in the lagoon.
Embankment Construction: The material placed in the embankment
shall be free of sod, roots, stones over six (6) inches in
'diameter, and other objectionable materials. GL G✓W1a9-5C-
materials shall be used in the embankment. Pervious material
shall not be used in the embankment. Construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 4 inches in
thickness. Compaction shall be equivalent to or better than the
routing of the hauling and, spreading equipment over the fill in
such a manner that every point on the surface of each layer of
fill will be traversed by not.less than one tread track of the
1

.. ;r
s OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION
loaded equipment traveling in a direction parallel to the main
axis of the fill. If pans are not used, construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 9 inches in
thickness and compacted with a sheepsfoot roller with a minimum
of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift. At -any time the
embankment surface becomes "slackened" such that the succeeding
layer will not bond to the previous layer, scarify the previous
layer sufficiently to assure bonding of the surfaces before
continuing with the fill operation. Construction of the fill
shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content
of the fill material will permit a reasonable degree of
compaction. Construction of the embankment shall allow an
additional kS % for settlement. Stock piled topsoil shall be
spread over top of embankment and outside side slopes for the
establishment of vegetation.
Pollution Control During Construction: Stripping of embankment
and borrow areas shall be done as they are needed in a normal
sequence of construction. Use temporary mulch protection on all
,V- disturbed areas that are subject to erosion and will not have
substantial additional work performed for 30 days.
Vegetation: vegetation shall be established on the slopes,
embankment top and all other disturbed areas, except the area
that will be inundated, as specified in the plans as soon as
possible after construction. Necessary steps shall be taken to
ensure that a good stand ofvegetation is established in a
reasonable amount of time.
Permanent Stake: A permanent stake (CCA salt treated 4"x4" post
or 1 inch diameter PVC pipe with tee,) -marked to indicate pumping
level elevations, shall be placed in the inside,slope at one end
of the lagoon.
2
I

PA
�i
THE STELLAR GROUP
Job No.
Date-o�izt 9 -
SUBJECT 5 -r - F1 ;E�. c-a7T CA vP-Klx/ Z000 6gxx,%,, 7o flo s Sheet No. of
SE � D I1.l.Ca �.�Uo M M�a DaTI ptii 5
SSF�T_DIti.1
DPrrES
56Ep4+.lCR MlxYJ�L�
ljrprF-C-;A is -Co
` 175).154 r--� apt al tP. CoL k S.S. C.
3'oNr 30
e.o 96,, - W iTkt
G0Mc'10Q
L`��R FM'tvDAr
TO
>sv�.�-Eta 6ERMvv� C,Fza�55
p+os�-
4 is 4 OD l T l o rs) }kr P P t1y ro L-t-c L-, c u cj
{moo rZot s 4' GE o Q6g�y�SG.
10�10- la V-(L L moo -ibs
S Msr�+r GtPRA-iy-f S7 P-Aw ( lao

Si-rr �3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Soil Conservation Service
MC-ENG 34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner: S M {�,� ,�/ s 4,rr c,'ja-� ' ►a County: k a L-+ �: Ax
Community or Group No.: N1 z. Conservation Plan No.:
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam(ft): to FT, Length of Flood Pool (ft): ,00c Fr•
Date of Field Hazard Investigation: 7 _ 2 n - 9 z
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect from
sudden dam failure.
R
e
a
c
h
•Length
Width
Slope
Land
Use
Kinds of
Improvements
Est. Elev.
Improvements
Above Flood
Plain
Est.
Elevation of
Breach
Floodwater
Above Flood
Plain
tDeo
SOOb�
0,Z0/o
5+1AwlP
GOW i�AVI.
SwofMV
G I•a �[-.
uescrioe potenuai for loss or lire ana aamage to existing or proname future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach: Ro ?* rC:ur4A4` r-o►z Lass cFe L I r= Z .
(-*VJ "A-JL Swl}MP iS L *C-AerF-0 a [Ooo+ DouuSris.C^164. No SrA-oc-rulzics oR
Ro4DS A LS L"ATi'o P G;;TWV-r-.J LACGaop4 Os%%0 SWPrM1P
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (l, ll, III, IV, V) Z:.
By: F� k% +P T.1F�-Lf ,Y� PIR-Ec..Ta{Z or— Date rot (.- Y'Z-
(Name) - (Title) r-q
Concurred by: Date
(Name) (Title)
Note: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed,

A
�°�
THE STELLAR GROUP
Job No. '1 (-a t- z 33
Date SI CztgZ
SUBJECT Sc. orr 4%vT` V- t rrV- irx5L.0 L, 04 FarRW;,-SITS.++r.3 Sheet No. __�_ of 3
L!k 004 S T s Ta /ZA,Q ir-
, AAA F AACA MC7k,,0
E;LXl4TIoN
p,-4Cg-a44£
AREA
VdLVMC-
LL.)mr)VVA'rj
Vdwr1E
�z 3
1zSZ►4
--
--
r
7
1Z_`bIM
1Z.7'L
GgOA
90°r`i
7Ir
13 3057
1 3ob W
1 3101S0-f
2.191 q_;
-75
i 3 7 A-12-
l3SZfo5
1'3S17.4a57
35519 9
?CQ
� i 9 (ac
1 39-714a
119171to
-+94915
-77
tkiQ,51LG
if24c
1'F4tI'Z4o
Lp39t55
-700
SIBS&I
lag1 !S'7(0
"79-79,71
79
1r.�r, 05Ca
[ ar35a't
15305404
91+1495
4�o
tLa oCo3Z
15Ib2k4
65S,2.44
1099739
b!
142 0
�ca3o5Ca
1ca3�o5Ca
12i4?'!95
4,L
1"?04oa
[laig4o
j191,94c
1oc3o��5
-ron of D1+LE= -b4.o
TOT A►- D Es►6,vL
VoLvMF_
t,69-1.3z-5 F
L► 1 1_L c R aF
L 2. 5 C- OP- c. i-4 1" Wrr, F.I AL
1, FRsf_,a.A zo
25 `tR-• STpRN1
VOL.uN1F 1 �Z25� Ge� 82.•3"7 33
a ESL Ea rJ V o L: u ► vL —
y5 Y Ft. gToc.PA z
1 °r9150625 c,F
RE aV►P-5-0-rt-CArMIE"-r
-t' S, L-U D 61 1E_ _
to 4 A4- o ao C.F
5HLiT = 7 z{-, c

Job No. 71-o t - z- 3 �
j� Date
THE STELLAR GROUP
SUBJECT u rz- w r FrEc-, r- s Sheet No. t of f-i
sor L- 7-Es7" Plrs
CA ILa um 0 5 vox E: A-e-,r — Z 5 F ,:5 o.v a t— +d-t j a +u.41-C ,Q. 7- 3 L �C
-z - _.
UaP-+Ny /
PEP-r To
GRoutiID 15vRPAGjc-
SF{wT
rp-sr Pert.-
*Q
�uu�s�t[�+1T�o►l
t +
-7- -Z.-+-92-
4-o"
ycA o
2- -r
--7-2--)-9,L
21��kw.a¢n
9l 4 �`
`i5�5"PsaUAr.o
3
7- 2`7-9Z
3ot`-PEacsO
q9•o
9[�•9-rtc.+�
9-
5
84.gob — p
t�,S•4t$ A 17—s^-k Jo -A,S SydwT -J �. A,r10P,4 1N L.A.C.)0a9 v�s�4U
SATE �'�'
botzs"7/
r�Ls +
•dn,7-r_ pF
EµVSSr+4R71ok
DLtiPr1+ ro
sr:L.+r
cj-;L. 4'YlC/S
64T•
CL4.VkrtO^R
D%-F "4-
-L"1-9Z
30%
�-1,4
T4•La
F3u z
'i�Z`1- 9 �-
4 z"
-� S• l
7 4-
-1-7 - 91—
to
7 44 • La. A,"15 s s E" V-5E O As- sa a W T I�4 L A-y o o M D ES t 6% N
-'- S0P-q p G.4MP i-.aS!�-oG., itit�� o,.! E!)� 3 ( 9Z
+�e y e Nt -11 I
fi trRor� �c1S `�o�G-S 1�1VE<ST14A-ri--f Rr.Poa_T �>a.�.o -I--z-I-9
-ti- P~�o►�t p TAD 9-1(Q- 9'Z-
L-o t o.1 S

LAGOON SUMMARY SHEET & TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
Settled top of dam: a4-.o
ate
Tap Width
f Sf $4�"S Construtct t0P Of darn
Fill Yardage: q� 415Z
-Natural ^gi_oUnd elev. V t rS
---- .--_-------- --__ -- `_x--------------_
cut off seal D -
-*--\DPpth deterrnind 13y
Depernd s on egt.ti pment "_!_:t� SCS on site
Start land application'} Stop land application
elev. $2�3-] / elev. $o,'L
_111Temporary Volume
------------------------- _-__- ------------- ------------
Seiat
SUPport-- Treatment Volume
� 41a
3 Top of slLidge elev. '73-o u�A .3
5l Udge aCCUriwl ati on
Laoytl�tc�r+� elev. -].3,0 -
. I} .`
Lac)nt7n size: Length 4i l2- GJi dt:h Ct-t. Yd a. excavated
RENCW
MARK
1)ESCR I F'T I ON :
To P
o
c,,L P-o
AS �a 0"
PL, 4w
C, AHj-
600tp As50-4Arr-'T=s
E I e v a t i a n
7o 35-
GENL' RAL. I Ni= f3PMAT I ON
JOB CLASS: 11
HAZARD CLASS: A
ANIMAL TYPE & NUMBER: 2oO0 ao5ow
KIND OF OPERATION: R4-ou,
1,110TEC: If Const,r•t_tct::i t-sn i a nOL
started within one year, this
plan is nat valid L.tnLi.l re-
c?vali.tat_ion cif fIoc)d p.la.in -For
s,af ety hates and i s:s rfo:%de .
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL. WASTE
(SINGL..E STAGE)
5411TI4FrE,�SL_o_�tla� L W-3 FARM
COUNTY
110rz1`H CikR-o.uOS STATE
U. S. DEPAf;TMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL_ CONSERVATION SERVICE jl
OCSIGNCD BY:
AF PROVED BY:
TITLE:

SCS-(NG-S38 AR ME 4 F:AC ICUL URE
I C Ti
SOIL INVESTIqATIIINITO DETtkMIN.E'SUTA I I 70t
FARMER'S NAMEzL/L/_)L_r�
U151
11 H
0 -7 DATE
S. C. S. P.110TO S11E.ET �0.
WATERSHED ARE' ME�wRtmi.-as:14
CW
ilRO-
N-0 Owl
J'
A
S"-rcH OF PROPOSEDIPO
PRIM,
NNE
11
ME
MEN
NO
NNE
111�,'Ilw
3191
B"INIRSE20a"its-
ON
NIEMEN
I
I
mmummummmomi
ONEEME
BEEN
ffifflumm
ENO
WARCHIGN
11FACHMN
i3oRING-NUNtBER A.N;D POFT
iff"Pip"iffmilElm.
■iiii I • IMMIUMMEN921M
I f®i■iL�Li■i�lll
IIEM .0
1=21=1
Im
iI�IIL�;�I■I■
I�I���i�l
i�l�!`
.'■i■I�I®�®+®��■I11�'�ffl�l�!��I'�I�
. &11MJ 7-
.Serra /

,si
IUHiFIED CLA IFI
GW-Well"igraded'graveis; g ave
:'GP -Poorly graded gravels
GM-Silty'gravels; gravel-s d-
GC- Clayey gravels; grave -sa
SW -Well 9*raded sands; sad-gr
SP - Poorly graded. sands
SM -Silty; sand
SC .Clayey sands; sandal y m
ML-Silts';"silty, v. fine sand ;'s
CL-Clays' of low to medium pl
CH -Inorganic clays of higi pia
MH -Elastic 'silts ,
OL - Organic silts and silty cla
OH -Organic ,clays, medium to 1
1. Suitable material for ern
REMARKS
irl ,
I i,
r
2. lrrpla.in'hazacds reyuirting Istse
C L-f C`
13 a,rt
GJ r TM �4 T
f
GENERAL' ItE: MARKS;
7_e1keCAA4G7 rr A
vdTex- 7A' 0
24 2S 1126 27 28 1 2y I 30 31 131
OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED
'
(Use one of systetils be�uw)'
AlON 'a.,'k`ll1 liyl
4 li
I•�
an4 aaiY I { =1 Ir S kgra a�
f.
ssnd�,I,i`
Ik Muir 11'? I of ={vety �iti
lay(mix t I sl a'aaid'yloi
01 msx . ,' I, fsl4fin' l;san,
I,
darosl si
rclayey sif t '. .'siI ssi
ticit? daa
y . ,' ; I i -'ci cla'CC
E
i I ityl I sicl ,sj tq�;ci
scl as dycl
s, {low plasticity.,. sib si �y IIIa
1 i plpStlClty C-Clay�il11�,.
at is available +Yea ..++ !
teM
f Ij E'
�I sI
nL '"
t 1 I c ltf t-
gtw'ptioa'in deal
%stspgg4l ap,
11d 7'6,4,A,atG
, I
f r r1,llt• r� !
E �I 14Ii:
j. 3d 35 3611 37.1138 1 33 40 :41! 11
■ice ini�i�
MJMIRU
minino
m11
MINIMS
MINN.
DMIN1
0001%
MIKIMEN
r'lfhld 1 rI,'.1i
rl i ! ,
.r
Lrl
f I K"Il
t
t i9
E
1t r 11
�
i
r
g.
.r
r
i-
i
4tit:'
Ui
r i
{
kN
;
`h

ry% Job No. 7&o 1-
Date ta (,Z= 1
THE STELLAR GROUP
SUBJECT 5c0T^'r- Lr,uP- V- I sr•rr;,H Fr an 4••foc,, Via. r_ms _ Sheet No. I of I
SO!— TEST PITS
Cl P—o I0 5 5f.asa�✓�},� �ltSN kUAr,EF� T4•3�1�
[�aP-,Nh /
DFkrE ��r'rL TO
G2outi4D 15ufLr-c*G.C-
SPwY
•rr=sr PLr t.
o F 5►l OJT
eL-EJATr01,4
C\jA r%ctij
1uuEsnCagTSo�l
L
40"
9Co. 'a
_k'Zs IED
q i , 4 �`
�j5•15' PE kO
3 i"
7- 27-92
--so ftgvw,
q9,0
91a•�S-P rc► p
9 Z • 1 -Z-
za +-a= -- -
q-[�- 92-
2G"- pf~ s�,s�
57.15 ""K
84•`7� — P
9-[(a-9z-�34"
_
�. g�.3I
85 48
12�'5-4t 5
�)Of25 uU67
T•r-S rr+�
l►+V ST��aT'.on{
P eT TO
5::.wr
G- 12-0v1-1D
Trar.l
wr1 O+y
1-1-7 - 9 1-
74.Ls- A1P%5 SSE" US -SO As t��JT- EL.cv�--rtor4 IN ��-cxooN DESt4N
-;f Sv4=V'ayE r.r s v'•tea- h .��k3,�- orJ �43Iy7
r'r' �'4,oM �h7F-L7 9-I(a- 4"L
fio'F-ts.Jc� .( ,T~ moo: r_.� :�' A._� _ o .. *��a:.�°�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural'Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm #19
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
4 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject:
l Z_001/1�­/"Z"`,`�­
Fertilizerr Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste ManagementanSystem
Facility Number 42=T0
Halifak--County
This Ietter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

"We
THE STELLAR GROUP
Job No.
Date - I 1 i 9 -x-
SUBJECT. SG oT r _4ur�K-w �-000 VAR+zow o v�Ep-F--PL. - -0-- 3 _ Sheet No.
MI
!
} i ..
:1 0 oco
IL
n
r {
It
ftl
I f � - ! I I 1. i,. I. q .4'-•--�:� - !
:
r rr
r
r !
r r � r 'I
T[t
U•
r.'
f
I
I f i I l I
• i � I - I�, f
,i
' •,-.•_.-,. _I..; ...; L.. � .i__.1 k...�..,� ! 1 Y I ;- , ! -I I � i � ._I I I ; I �. L i I ! i r I I ; ! I I ; I i ,
,
{ V
I i I I
# � I
{
r i
I
I
l
1I
, 1
N
..:''{��I
I
E i
• -� ' I i L.-! ; I { � I � ,• i -I--! .� � Ord Ci..�. i ii; f ? ! i I i , r
I :
! � i t I >I i . ,- .. � I r I i i �- I { I _�_ i.. I. •1d f I I � I , t._ I' ( i �,._ I .I }. r I i _ , ._+. `.._,._.
-� — r -!--.i-- -�-;-- --i ...-�-•r� --� -t- ! 4r { i. l .!_-,. IIl! I- � Ifk I I i � I.,.i,.
•. -� ` I. 'I I� -�._' -_.I. ,- � 1 I i i �
77
- I -
1 !' I -- - �-
I 111 t
I I I I-
i� •
[ � I
• f � I
II € I
, r _
• I i i- -I. I I I
! -E
71
r_L _
h

c
p'J
IB HUNTJR,J;�
k.
NOR
IOLMAN
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
September 18, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Todd Rowe
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
P. O. Box 487
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Brown's Farm # 19
COC AWS420010
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Rowe:
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
On September 11, 2000, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection at the subject swine operation. The inspection
revealed that the facility was compliant with its Certificate of Coverage with the
exception of the following deficiency:
A records review indicated that the last waste analysis for this facility was
collected in May of this year and that land application had occurred beyond
the 60 day window allowed for the collection of a waste analysis.
Your Waste Utilization PIan for this farm lists coastal bermuda and small grains as
the receiving crops. If you haven't already done so, now would be a good time to
collect a sample of your lagoon for early fall application to small grains.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in correcting this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice please call Buster Towell at (919)
571-4700.
incerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Dept.
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files
MAILING ADDRESS: 162a MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1626
LOCATION: 3600 BARRETT DRIVE. SUITE 101, RALEIGH, Nc 276o9
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Browns of Carolina I
Farm #19 d
PO Box 487 d
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Mr. Browns of Carolina Inc:
e��
IDEEHNF;Z
Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Farm # 19
Facility Number 42--10
Halifax County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone]. .
Sincerely, hh��
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, PC
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]T50% recycles/109% post -consumer paper

rip
o
0
r+�
September 6, 1995
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Your letter dated August 24 concerning management deficiencies observed on July 19 at
Brown's of Carolina Farm #19 was received on September 5. Glenn Davis and Sonya Johnson
visited this farm on August 22 and reported the newly sprigged coastal bermuda crop to be
establishing well for an irrigation spray field. All soils appeared to be stable, minor washes will be
repaired during the spring which is the appropriate time for pasture renovations. Major washes
will be corrected as necessary. It should also be noted that the irrigation system will be managed
so that overspraying does not occur. The lack of sufficient freeboard in the lagoon has been
corrected and the broken septic tank line was repaired immediately. If any questions arise
concerning this farm, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jim R. Vinson
Environmental Resources Manager
cc: Greg Brown
Scott Gurkin
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
303 EAST COLLEGE STREET • P.O. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398-0487 • OFFICE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

May 11, 1998
Mr, Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
Brown's of Carolina
Scott Gurkin
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 2839$ ---1
Igo
This letter is in response to the Notice of Deficiency I received on facilities #42-10 and #42-11,
which are Brown's #19 and Brown's 418 respectively. Since receiving your letter, I have had the
pumping records transferred to the forms the other Brown's farms have been using. I am enclosing
a copy of these to see if they will meet with your approval. A copy of these records has been signed
by the Operator In Charge and placed with the other pumping records.
All of 1998s records have been transferred to the new forms. I hope these will meet with your
approval. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Scott Gurkin

Nitrogen
Application Summary"(Ibslacj
Qgm-gley YJr
EACM Hvdrpnt Q= N Required
N A oR lied N
to-A66iv_
%N Anulied
1998
18 D Ber Gr 275
56.70
218.30
20.62
AM
18 E Ber Gr 275
28.35
246.65
10.31
1998
18 G Bar Gr 275
28.35
246.65
10.31
1998
18 H Ber Gr 275
42.53
232.47
15.48
1998
18 l Ber Gr 275
42.53
232.47
15.46
Friday, May 01. 1998 Pap 1

Irrigation Report Form
Farm
18
Hydrant
D''
Fn
Complex
# Sprinklers
='
Date -
�.rF.
Year
1998
Crop
Ber Gr
A
2..1
Field
Lbs N Required
275 s
Lbs N Residual
Field Acres
Lbs N to Apply
275 C
Start
Stop
N11000
Lbs N In to
Date Time
Time
PSI GPM Gallons
Lagoon gal In/Ac
Lbs N to Apply Apply
04/08/88 2:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 70 18 ! 2_10 0.50 28.35 246.85 4.35
04I07188 4:00:00 PM 6:00.00 PM 7p � � - 1 g 71
2.10 _, _0.50`� 28.35 218.3D 3.88
E= 0 —_.+�� F -' I.-�-' ', �� O.DO 218.30
�----•-L,-.218.3D
�0�
771 O. QO 218.30
Crop Report Form
Planting Date Seed Rate Variety
Harvest Lbs Total N/Ac
Date YieWlAc Harvested
N Harvested
lUni# Yield r----•-----.--
L 0 �T

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment7, Al
and Natural Resources 4
Division of Water Quality 0
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
_ r
March 20, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RE IPT W"U STED
Brown'sEo ECarol'ina, Inc.
Farm # 19
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 42 - 10
Dear Brown'sEofECarolina, Inc. :
You are hereby notified that Farm #19, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application. ;
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
�.. , t\
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete,the,
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality"
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 �;�� ..�
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at (91•,9)7"13-5083 extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
4u- A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUN-22-01 FR I 05 : 52 PM EAS I CARE FAX N0, 8048342909 P. 01 /03
Carroll's Foods of Vif�inla, fnc.
PU Pox t2�
434 E. Main Sf,
Waverly. VA 23800
(804) 834,2109
(804) 83 1-37..07 Fax
To, J.D. Hester
Fgxs [phone]
Phom.
F►on Neil Za111'adka
Pm34 , 2 (including cover)
Date- June 22, 2001
6te; P.0,A, Farm 52
CC;
Ronald Vincent
11 Urgent OFor Review
11
Please Comment
0 Please Repty
As Requested
a Cm nent%—
'this Puri of Aclion Is providc d in response to the freeboard level less than 19" recorded at Brown's of
Carolina • Virginia Division Farm 52 (Facility 10 42-10) on Wednesday, June 20, 2001. The freeboard
level was reduced from 19" as a result of heavy rain.
Land application from this lagoon to increase the freeboard level will continue as soil conditions allow.
The followhig effluent application summary is provided to indicate that adequate allowable RAN
application area remains at this site.
Pleasc coniact me at (5o4) 834-2109 if you require further information.
Thank you.

r �R L,. S FCv�-S 0< L'4 iN
L';LL Fp?:I i.Tic-i (f=:es 5;;inp � 3 =.i ?z'th31_ 2.O
pY Cnrn 7731.-3
;7r, m 52 �.^i��- iT - JJij 31. 2110:
^2C '/Ear`❑I-eeIr6gi.-c -sumrra^: .9aj1-3ES 0..-o7-31,2X-
-EF. LUET;" AP IJICr:TIC A AT 5�tT!;FI`LlCAgP- L-S iL: BY -.ELD Fa:: Grain :etc-mL•_r 3C. 2DO`
P:.i:rj-.
ALLGr'AE�Lr
AVAIL: BLE
Rezyxnrra.^_ed
PA!
PAN
A".LC':JD9LE
I'Jr 2„G J
PA _D_3ing
A?PL,''EO :i
4--�PLZAi12«
A?PL': A'rv7,z
K
fir.
Cu
'FARr1
F:=LC
CAP
EFFL'JE1r
A P Pul Ev
AnPIlED
[':vacra;
OF7 COAL
F= !AINfVG
pc A::1 ;
AFC E D
P?! IF-D
a�;L=Eb
AFPuILs�
=_mil
ri�'�^-e�
p:.s���+e7
n'ti�cce:
Y.ct� a'�,r�s1
rlbsacrei
rIC�*acr=}
rlt�a.-sej
?�s:�e�
52
A
SPF<,res,asgrain
=.43
33,5 R
...t�
0-4
2?
50
65%
0
6
v
c^._i1
+)r:7
t rrr��a razs
5 1-31
;3,� 2
0-8
52
255
20%
703
393.22.9
11
iC�
d-21
0 G7
..
FIc sr -grain
5.L3 ......
......-._ ...._�.................,
G'.0
_-.. 0 -.�-.�_._._..-_._.._......-_._,
50
050
50
96,9G4
0
C
0.00 --_
G ED
J�
5
R:FtGsTra•L9Pa- I
S.`0
53,1^3
GA
-
25
51
WA
..._-._.._.._._
O
-
E
-
51
-
0.12
GCs
t2rr _grams
5 K)
5•.,�?a
R-7
5
2a5
19%
190
345,908
9
-04
0.18
D_CO
=. LL sr.a'a�ran
g-13
G_0
Cr
0'6
50
91,071
C
0-0Q
C CD
52
1r
�?i�_raG scx a?I grr n
5.3J
3-Cc-
D-4
.2E
50
0%
0
-
E
55
O. i 1
D CU
L,Ur^I;.�479;ev,
5.30
126,14z
00
60
235
2 %
176
332,196
12
12"
0.24
GEE
F ALL -'.. H -
03
O 6
50
94.643
0
U
003
CLO
--.......�
._..._._.
5.1-.
....__..._..._.
0
59. EE-6
OA
_.__..
29
�...
57
.._
68°5
_
0
............,4
-
_ ._. _ __...
6
=J
0.`.2_
..m..,.
G_M
�Zrrn c grams
514
E1,320
0 A
3G
255
12 ie
225
413,366
5
62
0'2
G C-0
,..
FALL s;nai am
s 14
-
0 0
0
4^6
SO
0.00._.._._-.._�:
..__.
52
_ .__ _._._..
E
CO i� sma.t g7:1
--
5 CO
._......�._.
i 4,4F0
_.. -
Q 5
__.._ ..,...�_......
3f
_._T__..._._......._�-.__.__......._..._-
J
74
......._.._r._..._...91,7B&�__�....__.......Y9,.,._.-...-
7es
1-i5
G.CC
_ -r •n�
5-1!0
E9,252
G 7
45
25-)
79",;
210
375,571
5
03
.0.:6
D Gc:
�_.,....
FAaeL�Lnsumcza{ttgran....�
0
._.......,..�.D
._�.._.......
�
_"._........._-.
DC ] Y
a2
SPRING smallge:n
4.70
04
-
s
.S
0.:0
C_CU
ass
470
641)56
0.-/
-5
255
le-'.
210
352,9
9
92
CL 15
0 CO
FALL nallczn
470
fl.0_.......r�
50?83,925
Q
0
0.07
C-CO
52
C;
,. �__...._...._,._.__
S?'RI `F"o smau �Fair
4 32
......,.. ._..........
�
,�7 •
...-._
D. .o
..__._..._.... _.
3]
_,_........_...0°%
�7
_.__._....__.
757,
0
-
$
75
0.15
0. Go
uc.4ass
4 92
101.178
0 3
52
255
21%
?m
346 G24
:1
1C=
021
0 OG
ALLs-maflT=,'....
482
00
D
50
.._...86;071.�-0._....._..---�........_._
0.00
--
52
r__......
;-I
SPRI'Ksma:lgcir.
517
_.._...... _T_..-.._-...._�
7445C
05
_....... -
S3
...........
7
........O --
7?°%
.�...._..---
0
-
a
r5
- ._..._OCG
014
O,GO
S:.Tnucag-ass
5 17
122,646
013
59
255
23 %
196
361,346
:2
124
0-24
QCG
F�lLsm811cir-,ry
5-17
0+J
D
0%
SG
92,321
0
0
00.]
GCD
52
]
5P ?F1 sm�'l. E firt
5.24
51,32C
0.1;
29
31)
65%
0
-
G
61
0.112
C OD
1uCaaerrs
�.74
i83.56C
12
b9
2-16
34%
167
312,954
`8
183
0 35
0.90
FALL smaH gan
5 21
0.0
0
77
0;(
SD
93.671
0
Q
O Gll
Q GO
TO'. AL
:,54U-44E
4,CSS,735

P. 03/03
AUTOMATIC COVER SHEET
DATE: JUN-22-01 FR[ 05 53 PM
TO:
FAX #: [phone]
FROM: EASICARE
1961164 1 ' 1 illi MA pl, Ir
03 PAGES WERE SENT
(INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE)

,UN-22-01 FRI 05:50 PM EASICARE FAX N0, 8048342909 P. 0I/03
+'' C�rrail's Foods oCl�irffinla, Inc,
i'o Box 1240
45 t_ Main sl.
Wd Yv -rly, VA 2.3890
[phone]
MI) Fax
�aX
30: J.D. Hester
Fax: [phone]
]Phone:
Re. P,Q.A. Farm 52
From Neil Zahradka
Pages- 2 (including cover)
Datew June 22, 2001
Cc: Ronald Vincent
L� Urgent DFor Ravlow ❑ Please Comment 1:1 please Reply � Ax Requested
s cortunents:
This Pian of Action is provided in response to the freeboard level less than 19" recorded at Brown's of
Carolina - Vjiginia Division Faun 52 (Paclity ID 42.10) on Wednesday, ,dune 20, 2001, The freeboard
level was reduced from 19' as a result of heavy raid.
Land application from this lagoon to increase the freeboard level will continue as soil conditions allow.
The following effluent application summary is provided to indicate that adequate alowable PAN
application area remains at this site.
Please contact me at [phone] if you require further information.
Thank yoo.

E772i "-31
PNNNv.LrFPSpar,C-:7 'fer013'-?C_!i
yCa 510 Gr,- -3'.ZD1
2:101 Yoz. lc F,'e Img-mnn ober M, 7E-31
EF'I. -EN'1 :.PPLJCA7�CN AT S'VlT`J-FIELDCARRCUS zA�R :S BY =LLB Fa= G-2rr 14memD2, 23, 2C-71
p L.r,W
AU-OV-'.AS'-E
APrnO7C3 s't.T�
A VAl--A-' E
PAN
PAN
-
NITROGEN
PAN -_o
I ID 15
APPL;CA. ,O'1
APPUC'ATIG 3
K
Zn
G,
A,nr-+.
FiEL{?
Gq�_,p
Acres
F~LUW'
r?FL -ED
APF+ IFD
;i 'acrc;
OFG0. ;
fi=I.1nNING
PAPPL:--rl
APP IS
AF1 LI=�
AF��I 7
e}
fb6facl.0
;:G:d` g911Dns',
fl[r.:;a=rNj
, �)>acr2;
[ISb�ac-e,=
(,L Jzc;,e;
n
SPA-NG
-5.43
59,5-,3
D.4
27
50
65„
0
�
S
57
,
).: 1
QC-9
ba'r,.`d-Wr3as
5 43
343,4A2
C.8
`2
2"5
201Yr
2[33
393,223
11
109
0 2,
0.7J
..,..... --„-_-.
---------
_-FALL,s 3 gr'�..,.�_..5.43
__...,.....-_.._
_.......E:a..-
- ............. fl
5750.._..,.,,.......__�__.._.,,_9&.96C_.........
---.._..,....9.....r_.,
:C':_..___
0,G7........-
52
13
Sr=ZI14G2E,-nall z:;
5 ':9
J9,S:'O
C-A
29
S7
IWA
0
5-iio
91,-9
C_7
45
19rl�
Y90
345,908
9
94
0,18
0,C]
FALL
:�:
6 0
raj
D°b
- ...............
..........._
_ 0 G
52
G
SF i�LG sma9 n
5.33
So;3 4
lz 4
..-_ �.
iC
53
63°/i
.....,-._.._....._.-_......_....31,071.......w
0
-
3
5
�� _
LIA ;
..
0,ci
h�-TnL{'i.2ss
5.51D
125,1.14
0.9
GO
23S
25y
17E
332,1W
12
i24
074
0,L.]
FALLS'Hall-r3�,_W....�.5.37.._.
-
c�11
0
r�
0'0 _
--
50
99,�43
0 ..............
0 _.,, ..
OC:7
Of<�
�.._..
52
�....__.-
D
SPRING =_mall taro
5,`---4
_.�_-�..-_..._.—._._.
5L3,5CIS
__�..-...-.,...,-.-.-.._........_-_.
9
50
.
sell,
__....._.._�_._......
0
--...,.__.
-
6
6)
0 12
O C-J
t,-^mr.Csj'ass
5114
1,32G
D 4
30
255
12%
725
413,3&G
5
52
01.2
G CO
s�
5'4
0fl
!)
57
09a
50
yf,736
^
3
0C3
0C!]
V
-
—FALLfnal
SPRI13sma1E-airk
5 ifs
r`Z,450
0.5
3-174
y
0
a
75
0.1=
O CO
tv,mL.,U -ass
5LJ
a3,352
0.7
45
25
1 B Y,
tie
375,F71
4
93
O.+F
0C3
J 0
0
��.
SD.-
8? 286....-
r�
0
O.iIJ
F
SPRIN-, sm34: gain
470
eg 056
-
3 4
..... _ .-- -... _
.,c
. __5: ..,_....-
51
- -
-52 'A
._..... ......--.....
0
54
G {C-
O.CJ
t*rmLCac-ass
470
E4,08(i
0.7
.35
255
SB'i
210
352,553
93
IL15
❑.C-)
F7,LL 5'na11C.-d r,
z 70
-
0 0
0
50
0%
50
93,3Z9
L`
0
0 CJ
0 C.7
FPPIK ; raja' grain
z 62
72.27C
3 6
;37
_. -53
75%
_
0
B
74
0 15
0 C-]
bermj;C2�,ass
4.82
101, :78
08
52
25s
21-A
203
348,624
11
1 )9
021
0.0
FALL sma3l rr:
?'2
3.0
0
57
0%
60
B6,071
0
0
O.r D
ON
52
N
.:'-..___.4
SPRII� sm "prejn..._
_. ..
3c
.., _..._r-
S]
W.. _......__
72'z
(3
-
s
75
0 tt
O G9
bermuCar as,,
5.17
122,C'r1D
(19
59
255
23%
196
361,34E
12
524
0.2e
O.Ca
-ALL �rnaq c-a n
517
00
0
�3 ---.......__�.
0°r6 .__
s0
92.321
0
_ .......
i)
0 G]
_ 0 C-]
52
t
....___....
'FtIL�G smac6rajn
.-...-..-.__._.-
5 2a
61,31G
__.._
0.4
--...-._--,
29
._ __,_._
F.0
69%
0
."__.-._ .....
-
6
6�
012
O C�
7emx.-d
5.7.6
18,3,950
1.3
Ba
25t
34%
167
312,95'?
18
183
0.35
OC3
`-A`_L sma6
5.74
019
0
1-0
0-Y
60
93,571
0
B
D.awl
000
.OTAL
1,540,746
4,065,395

MAY- 2-06 TUE 5:00 PM
BROWN S
FAX N0, 9102961675
85 Hwy 24 Cast
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 2&1 -WT
volew (010) 2W-1 WO
Fax: (910) 29"188
Fcow
To. �From.
BROWN'S
OF GAROLINA
Pkonfe Date:
Re: CC.
C] Urgent
e Commeritsa
13 For Review ❑ Please Comment 17 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
1

MAY- 2-00 TUR 5',00 PM BROWN S FAX NO. 2102961675 P. 2
10 *..
;i OF CAROLINA
May 2, 2000
To: OEHNR — Raleigh Region
From,. BF6w- n:s=of_Carolirie;_Inc
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
The following lagoon were less than 19" as of April 29, 2000.
Farm CiU 1 am
Please call if you wish to discuss these lagoons or the actions underway to alleviate
these high levels.
Gus Simmons 910-296-1800 (Office)
Glenn Davis 910-296-1800 (Office)
910-290-0366 (Mobile)
BROWNS OF CAROLINq, INC,

w
MAR-12-2001 MON 02:27 Phi BROWN'SOFCAROLiNA 9102966166
1', 01
Jam- BROWN'
OF CA.ROLINA
FaX
To#
�TIloo-29&
T-Hwy 2a East
Box 407
n a nn�rww, NC 2839E-0497
a 1 2 B01Iem
871-&M
11 a-M-al W -- Fax
FNNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
From
Fain Pagem
Phan"Dom
Rm CC:
© Urgent 0 For Review C] Plamm Cos meM a Plwme Reply C7 Plaasr Rsayols
0 Commsew
RECEIVED
PEAR 14 2001
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Non -Discharge Compliance Enf.

MAR-12-2001 MON 02:27 PM BROWN'SOFCAROLINA 9102966166
P. 02
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Faclitty Number. :--,l„dCounty:
Facil
Name 1C 00 RECE I V IE
Certified Operator Name: Jc1144-IA M WI -Ls-ON Operator AIAR. -1 4 2001
# . . �' V WATER QUALITY SECTION
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured f om the current liquid level in rth9Ff4pa9-ct-aol a Ent
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lag sons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Namelidentifier (0):
Spillway (Yes or No): ._..&.r.,. -
Level (inches): _a -
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
_kj:::::�_ Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action Is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content r.11 waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan iu a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crap ire Formation.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior 10. trangWl- of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's cei�ffl- ed animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopuiAted.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
w if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begirt land application of waste: T/ F�Q7
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the Information listed above and Included within the allnched Plan
of Action, and to the best
of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
J ex G.re "4--0440 /Ve • .... ... Phone: ledd
Faciilty Owner/Manager (print)
Date: a
Factiity OwneNManager (signature)
PoA Cover Pogo 2121100

MAR-12-2001 MOH 02:27 PM BROWN`SOFCAROLINA 9102966166
P. 03
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentlffer (ID): SOC # 19
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yrJ24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 Inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 18.8 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 0.8 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 175392 ft2
e. line c 12 x line d x 7.48 gallonse 87462 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 255571 f13 .
h. current herd # 200p certified herd #1 2000
actual waste produced ; QMnt herd # x line g = 255571 ft'
certified herd #
1. volume of wash water according to structural design 0 ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 171046.3 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 531850 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated F 1/17/01 1.20 Ibs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line 1 = 743.2 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

MAR-12-2001 MON 02,27 PM BROWN'SOFCAROI.INA 9102966166
P. 04
Ill. TOTAL. POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 26 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: BOG # 19
line m = 743.2 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line.m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 7432lb, PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOb. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT RF APPLIF-n nuRINO THIS 30 DAY PFRInD_
0, tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
9. remalnhg IRR-
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIEIO (lbs.)
column r x 6
G. application WjnQny
1425
1
Small Grain
4.09
55.02
225.0
Se t-Qct Feb -Mar
1425
2
Small Grain
4.62
53.27
246.1
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
3
Small Grain
5.15
20.27
104.4
Se t-Oct•Feb-Mar
1425
4
Small Grain
6.51
68.48
445.8
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
5
Small Grain
5.20
65.35
339.8
Sept -Oct -,Feb -Mar
1425
6
Small Grain
3.34
55.35
184.9
Se t-Oct•Feb-Mar
1425
6
Small Grain
Z06
63.75
131.3
Se-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
9
Small Grain
2.99
46.46
138.9
Se t-Octfeb-Mgr
1426
10
Small Grain
2.81
46.01
129.3
Se t-OcfiFeb-Mar
1425
11
Small Grain
3.00
29.74
a9.2
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
15
Small Grain
2.07
46,83
96.9
Se t-Oct:Feb-Mar
1425
16
Small Grain
60,60
27.26
1662.0
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3783.7 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section ll) = 743.2 lb. PAN
POA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

MAR-12-2001 MON 02:28 PM BROWN'SOFOAROLINA 910296616E P. 05
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section lit) = 3783.7 lb. PAN
Y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -3040 Ib. PAN
iUne y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and'
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and hard reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
lanother permitted facility, provide Information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility-
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH __- _ FREEn,30ARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: -fZ _ -
Facility
Name:C
C0
/Yids -I or, &,4
Certified Operator Name: L41.1141m_ - �,,tor� Operator
# Z4
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Nam/Identifier (ID): / Q
Spillway (Yes or No): /1(
Level (inches): _ /z
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered In the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility ,
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: _3�_ld
i hereby certify that I have reviewed the Information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Phone: ?14 - PZP - Aedd
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: _ /�e ---
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
PoA Cover Page 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): BOC # 19
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 18.8 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 0.8 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 175392 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 87462 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 255571 ft3
h. current herd # 2000 certified herd #1 2000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 255571 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (fines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 1/17/01
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
© ft3
171046.3 ft3
531850 gallons
1.20 Ibs/1000 gal.
743.2 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: BOC # 19
line m = 743.2 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6= 743.2 lb PAN
111. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR-
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
1425
1
Small Grain
4.09
55.02
225.0
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
2
Small Grain
4.62
53.27
246.1
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
3
Small Grain
5.15
20.27
104.4
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
4
Small Grain
6.51
68.48
445.8
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
5
Small Grain
5.20
65.35
339.8
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
6
Small Grain
3.34
55.35
184.9
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
8
Small Grain
2.06
63.75
131.3
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
9
Small Grain
2.99
46.46
138.9
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
10
Small Grain
2.81
46.01
129.3
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
11
Small Grain
3.00
29.74
89.2
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
15
Small Grain
2.07
46.83
96.9
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
1425
16
Small Grain
60.60
27.26
1652.0
Se t-Oct;Feb-Mar
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3783.7 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 743.2 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 3783.7 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -3040 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Teceivinq facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Xf�
1Dr-=HNFZ
Division of Water Quality
July 17, 1997
Mr. Scott Gurkin
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Browns of Carolina Farm 19
Facility # 42-10
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Gurkin:
On July 9, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation.
This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to determine
compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
The pasture located directly across from the office building
utilizes a solid set waste application system. Some of the nozzles
located in this pasture are situated in close proximity to these
well established cattle trails. During waste application events it
is apparent that these trails act as channels to carry waste down
gradient and into a small pond. The necessary corrections should be
made so that waste does not reach the pond which is considered
waters of the State.
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days
of. receipt. You should include in your response the actions that
you will take to address these deficiencies.
38W Barrett Drive, Suite 101, �`�' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NIEff An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Scott Gurkin
Page 2
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your -local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
"'eUneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District (Halifax)
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO,
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD\42-10

10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection - 7-5
Facility Number Z_ ?�
Time of Inspection 137 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last
Operated-.,........................................................_....`....L..._............................._............................................
Farm Name: p..�%?.�....�%..�........vr!rP�G...�.�..�..................... County:.f.�T��:.��.�`............... ....... ......... ............
Land Owner Name:... jr..Q w!"�......G� .... {� i.c�r/ ................ Phone Nw .....!./ U........ 7n3... .. G v............................
Facility Conctact:.. �'�L% ... lrG:,r�J ................. Title:................................................ Phone No: ....53!9 !:'. ...........................
MailingAddress:... .... 0..�`....... ..1�.. .......... rS A4,(.............!" C...........Z...0.......I...........................I ..........................
OnsiiteRepresentative: ...57`�p�C� ........ %./�.�tr��S...-..................................... Integrator: ... L?.:&G'.:.Zx ...................................................
Certified Operator: .-5.j� �.{11...f...6.,(�...................................................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 6 « Longitude 0 4 «
eneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes .;No
No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes d No
❑ Yes 42 1V V
❑ Yes
No
No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes�ON0
Yes
Continued on back

FacUity Number: , f (,�.,,
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
titructures_(Lagoons and1gr Holding -Pond
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3
...... Q U.......... ............................
Structure 4
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Ld'No
❑ Yes IGNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
0 0
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
1d'No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Sa o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
0-90
Aaste A]lplicati0
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
es
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or//runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15,
Crop type ?'4S.t................................................................................................................................................... ............
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
015o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Q o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
es
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No/
E
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
2<0
21,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
For_Certifted
22.
Facilities Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Co6hents (refer to question #} Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations orany other comments .>
se drawings of facility to better, explain situations (use additional pages as necessary}
LiAI s�� s�a ualt. �ra�+ p �,5 w . 7 e A, el. C.v cs� fa� � �/y
���- of F,c s sol. �l s' Sysfa,-.. 5, ►•e.,-�-I -*70�I J �t r ac 42 e /
+� I,! c� S'1� rR1-/ v'�-�-1 � .� 6 y C l/c Z`/rrt. f 4L14
�
►7 S I �^% iA'l ri 'f �� L-?'►gam d e"1. �'0 ii l^r J . �% in'L' t�iyYLlF �' f 7 // �ii/`-�C'h i.
t11^
p vY
a
n "^n', �4, , 3 +�"'q3 �ly°v`�-� 5 W' ,,,F, °�epe�v. +n'� w rca,,r f • 3„ r•. � .�.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
.� ReviewerlInspector Signature: K5 � _ _ Date: -7` ' F 7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
' Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
XPIWA
DEHNR
Division of Environmental Management
August 24, 1995
Mr. Scott Gurkin
Browns of Carolina
303 East College Street
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Browns of Carolina Farm 19
Halifax County SR 1101
Dear Mr. Gurkin:
On July 19, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine potential problems associated with animal waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
A broken pipe with black liquid waste water bubbling up from
the ground was observed on the back side of your waste lagoon. This
liquid flowed overland an in the direction of a nearby pond. This
liquid was later determined to be human waste from a broken septic
tank line.
The available land application fields were sparsely vegetated
and had been eroded by recent heavy rains. It was also noted that
some of the spray nozzles were located in, or very close to
diversions and/or waterways. This could present a problem during
land application if overspraying occurs.
Your waste. lagoon had one foot or less of available freeboard.
There should always be at least nineteen inches of freeboard in
your area to account for 25yr./24hr. rainfall events.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

11b
Browns #19
Page 2
In addition to continued facility waste management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically
address how you plan to correct this problem and submit a schedule
(with dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges to surface waters of the State are
subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate
submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth chuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
( Halifax County)
Steve Sennett-DSWC

VO -6- >
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
April 6, 1998
Mr. Scott Gurkin
Brown's of Carolina
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Farm #19
Facility # 42-10
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Gurkin:
On April 3, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr, Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from
your facility was not actively discharging to the surface
waters of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches,
or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of
willfully discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a
result of the inspection, the following deficiency was
observed:
Record keeping at this facility needs improvement.
There should be copies of the waste application records
kept on site on the approved forms labeled IRR-1 and
IRR-2. These forms should be separated by field
number, crop type, and crop cycle so that an accurate
determination of nitrogen balance can be assessed.
These records are to be signed by the Operator In
Charge designated for each facility.
On the date of the inspection, no records were
available to indicate amounts of wastewater and
nutrients applied. Without these records there is no
way to determine compliance with the State's
regulations.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27608
PHONE a 1 0-571 -4700 FAX D 1 8-571 -471 8
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /ARFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLKWI O 6 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Scott Gurkin
Page 2
The deficiencies regarding record keeping should be corrected to
reflect an accurate record of land application activity at the
subject farms. The Raleigh Regional Office suggests that you check
you records and adjust them accordingly back to the first of
calendar year 1998. By doing so, the facility can again be
considered to be in compliance with the approved animal waste
management plan and regulations governing the requirements for
Certified Operator in Charge.
Please respond to this Notice within 30 days of your receipt,
outlining what measures that you will take to correct the above
deficiencies.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call
Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincer ,
Kenne c r, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
H:42-10.wpd

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 9, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jack Keane, General Manager
Brown's of Carolina, Virginia Division
PO Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
.Subject: Notice of Violation
Intent To Enforce
Brown's of Carolina Farm 52
Permit No. AWS420010
'Halifax County
Dear. -Mr. Keane:
17'_�
400
�f
NCDENR
NORTH GAROLINA DEPARTMENT pg
ENVIRONMENT AND NAWRAL RES0URa;E5
On December 16, 2002, Division of Water Quality staff from the Raleigh Regional Office and
the Central Office conducted an aerial inspection of confined animal operations in Halifax and
Northampton counties. This inspection led to the discovery of an illegal discharge of animal
waste from the subject facility which flowed into surface waters of the State.
Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office met with Mr. Ronald Vincent, Farming
Manager, on site at approximately 3:30 PM. The inspection revealed that wastewater was
actively flowing from the spray field in front of the farm office into several large ponded areas in
the lower portion of the field. The run off continued to flow from the field through a culvert and
into well channelized ditch which flattened out into a small wetland area. This wetland area
then flows to a larger pond located on Brown's of Carolina property. This pond is hydraulically
connected via a breech in the pond dike to the adjacent Cow Haul Swamp (Beech Swamp).
The inspection also revealed that wastewater was also actively running off the spray field up
gradient of the farm office, near the cattle enclosure. Though this waste stream did not reach
waters of the State, it was observed leaving the spray field and entering the adjacent wooded
area.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone]D FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5D% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Mr. Jack Keane
Page 2
The inspection revealed that land application activity had been conducted on fields that had
dormant coastal bermuda and little if any sign of any growing crop such as small grains which
are specified in the farm's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Please note that the above referenced discharge is a violation of North Carolina General Statute
(N.C.G.S.) 143-215.1(a) which states:
No person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following activities
until or unless such person shall have applied for -and received from the Commission a permit
Therefor and shall have complied with such conditions, if any as are prescribed by such
permit -------- -----Make any outlets into waters of the State.
You should also be aware that this facility is considered to be in violation of its General Permit
Condition II.,2., which state that a vegetative cover shall be maintained on all application fields
in accordance with the CAWMP.
The Raleigh Regional Office is prepared to proceed with the enforcement action for the
aforementioned violations. This Office is already in receipt of a response letter from Mr. Neil
Zahradka concerning this matter. If you have any.other response or justification for us to
consider you.may submit it ink within ten days of your receipt of this Notice. In the
absence of any such justification, the Regional Office will forward an enforcement action to the ' . .
Director for his review and signature.
If you have any questions regarding this matter you may contact Buster ToweIl at (919) 571-
4700.
Sincerely.
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
D Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil & Water Conservation District (Halifax)
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

Q— )o
t
August 1, 1997 E�1:
DEHNR ALEIGH
C/O Kenneth SchusterOffU
3800 Barrett Drive, Sui
Raleigh , N.C. 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In regards to your Notice of Deficiency for Brown's of Carolina
Farm 19 dated July 17, 1997, the following actions have/will be
taken:
1. The cattle in that pasture have been moved to allow
the grass in the cattle trails to reestablish itself.
2. If, within 30 days, this has not occurred,we will overseed
the necessary areas to regain proper cover.
I trust this response will be sufficient. Please let me know
if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
L.SCott Gurkin
Brown's of Carolina

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources.
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 7, 1995
MEMOIRANDUM: ;
I
To: Regional Water Quality Supervisors
From:' Dianne Williams Wilbutnw
Subject: Information from Regions
Animal Operations
Aug 7 ' 95 10 :17 P. 01/02 [ Z _ 1 U
AlFKVIC
41
C) oEHNF=1
Post -it" Fax Note 7671
Dale 7 pa► 2
To
U 0
cx UJ �
From
Go.l[)epL
co.
Phone #
Phone n
914 71,SDd 2.
[oxas
491IC'-7l5-LOGY$
Please find attached a note from Steve Tedder. He has a meeting with the Governor's Office at
5.00 today. Please provide the following information and fax to me by 2,00 today. Please feel free
to hand write the information.
Farm Na.me:6 ro h-n S _ p t: 6,n r d < < w of Owner Name: S,�
Responsible Parry (if different from Owner): J
Location[: a / n d /�t? V
County: rl r�r! rfi �' Fish Kill: Yes ooNoircle One)
Type and Amount of Waste Spilled:✓
Summary of Spill:
v i J AV-1 a
�
Sri r P*4 ( e
IQ c . ypr y
y 7g �S
L17Ci�'f Lit
�'� '
1 !'T�'I�,5
V I /
✓ I �,,,t,, c _ Pam+' O s ,
1-4 pis �9'�rlc ol
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX 919-715-fiO4e
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5o% recyctedl 10% post -cons urner papeo

Michael F. Easley, Governor,`! Q��
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources C..,
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.,+Director !Z3
Division of Quality
August 4, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm #52
PO Box 1240
Waverly VA 23890
Subject: Facility Number:42- 10-National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has been required by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to develop a NPDES permit program for animal waste management systems.
The Division has developed a general NPDES permit similar to the state Non -Discharge
General Permit that this facility is currently permitted under. Pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statues §143-215.1, 40 Code of Federal Regulations §122.23, and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated May 9, 1994, coverage under the General NPDES permit is required of all
facilities that have had a discharge of wastewater reaching Waters of the State.
According to our records your facility meets the requirement for an NPDES permit based on the
discharge criterion. Please sign and submit the enclosed NPDES Short Form B — Existing
Facility. Please carefully follow the instructions on the form.
Please submit completed enclosed application within 60 days from receipt of this letter. Failure
to submit the application as required may subject your facility to a civil penalty and other
enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
If you have any questions -about the new NDPES permit, the enclosed applications, or any -
related matter please feel free to contact J R Joshi at 919-733-5083 ext. 363.
Sincerely,
M. Paul Sherman, P.E.
Cc: Halifax_County-Soil.and Water Conservation District
RR� Regional -Off ice, Division of Water Quality
Permit File AWS420010
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

{
C
-? ia' 0 -Z 3,�
531�`3ci Z
Q
�-2 68g'
3yV, 53!! r"vo0 --:>I -dorn fi-L-dV3
_7 -o/Y- No n'rnoh'S
S�airz� C>35 cd o vd ory EJ ri1 s ix� H1 i ' �dM1z:d0 S 'v"74 r GQ tj'-:P01r+ f7 G7 N/S!?
5 bH CI N b _Lo 7
TD- n- 14 T6-
IV-I1-
G1 07 rt Gz t] rl Cq.¢9v-7a•Ta-cv-•1.L9- r4
n ry 1Y " L'. rr 7[ rt 1Z Cr Cl ra ra rV
SC 7 Yl CS n [] Iz 42 Is 1E i'C rr m-ae-rLi-r7 67 Lt 91 IV ru
r2 0'7 621Z- L�W.LE u�-M-tl-a]-ty- CS 6C .I LL-j �. K t1 rq ra
Tl A Lii'r IR-K-OS-K-K-6T.-fr;^rv-OS-V;-6L-rS'.'' 27 ii7 rC v cm Zv
r1 L.GK T.-fK-K-PG-ai-K-a;-OC-K-R-as-[lt-at-DE-a'CiY-�Lv r4l L- .0 LV [q
r9- rs rt.,` rL-K-rL-PS-aG-R-PL-aS-rL-6L-rL-aS-PSit•LY-h-�T- CL1 a7 Cl rI rV
Cv- 1S 1'ra2-rL-rS-PL-aL-PG-et-VC-rL-PC-K-PG-at-LYi'1i'.tr-1K' 1LI /Z Ya .11r .a- G VIr7Z- IgL-VC-K-K-PG-rS-a'S-LS-PS-a:-PGiY-rY�•-LY-LY-YI-iLE LZ VV .D
Ca -IT gi7E-r-cL-n-rC-n-K- as- n-rc-ru-LY-rr.1Y-9Y-"-Y.iY-& YCC. �q'9 6.1 rq CS
n K 7Pr-iF-rT.-DG-aL-PL-fL-PL-aL-OC-K-4r-1'. �I-C.-C.-.'.-•'•-•T- 'G7 41 Cv ra
Tv rs]6rr�T.-2s-PS-a;-PC-VS-aS-65-9G-LY-rr-9t-rY-..-0 V-c -C.-tp- r7I n art ry ra
La 6. I lxv,at L4 IT
ro tr`�-[si6s-Ls-e;-rs-K-rs-PG�Yr�s•-rr-rr-zr-[.-1-+-Ir-f[v o!1 ss ro
SF R P.ILn-S'9�7FLs{S-rYrl/'G-rS-ViiY-1Y-Y.-.Y-C•-n-e•-P'•-r,-s.-rn rt r= .v ro
CF 11 7f{'4 -G'7-1 rK-TS•E'G-K{i-KEY-L'IK.'r-.Y-2Y-Pr-al-Pr-a1-II 6] �! 7/ PaI 70
a'[['I�rcxfsr+-24a9-ss-ct-K-tc-cE-eE;.-cY-rr-cr-r.-cs-rr-n- tz L c, ( La ca
n rir•-Tf-rL-PL 77-rTii-ly e{ }S{siY-['r-YI •Y-rY-C+-r•-7Ci rt J1 rT TV 91 .q
.] Plit n-L'L�L-rL-rc-Lv-cv-LsxG-[s-Lr-r.-Y.-r.-t.�•-tc• 9t �'c it Iv Ce Eo
Cr- rt ITp-s'! 6�y-4¢Pe-['[.L-rL-67-Z1LS-Cs-ri-rc-n-sr-ilK.-r-r-a� rt t'L rt
?9 ro7 L'[ i9i'r-f4R-LL{L-E4.6S-7T.•fS-rYKY-LY-CY{+-L'i• ►r'['L r• r9
rv-CV-ro- n'•-PL•-rS-7S�S=r7•S4L}LTiY'[9-iS.1S J3-TS{.-Y.-.-•-•1- .�tO r,
zr n-n-n-i} ro�PT•aF LS 17�.}C_o-G9 C}•}L'}L}6¢ n-.l-rr-r2��rOl rq at to
C¢aY r'I-61-61-6a- rV T9.}Z¢ Cv n S] zZ T2 Vt 6rE C'0�-j�,T. ill E+ n
[}L]-Yi-Y2-.'2i."2-SI- ra rorz-f2-n-II-L7-r} VV Ca 61 In rr LT C. ZE VT Z7 r9 P• 11 [v rq
n-. Ps- i r: Cl 71 n P2 12 TZ 1-2M VT r2 r2 n I2 CT 91 K it r1
tr- z1- rum 11 1'r n n rr L-z 'T LE Z, L. n 79 IT " V1 Ls 11;17 n
rt-21 L} M- h 1v •1 4-2 91 C2 tZ rVom — r%W 6; r9 Ig YL C'C RR r9 TV L1 L1 LL •1
Lt- TV- IT V1 11 Tr Vr 92 rT 6E L• rL L; a999 r1 art V1 UAV 61 r6 l[ C6 C1 rE Eq
7•-L n- V- CO 1 In 61 s C 6t r9 619 VV M CG r9 61 IM +C .1 IS .2
LI-rD- Y6 rT rr E TZ 6S 1( rL T 11 61 L1 Cl
C 2 2
r4n -Y1-L} ' � n 21 � =E WE . 6s L [[ rc =LZ '. 1Q � n ro L ■a
a S a a Z
CHI- -n•i¢ r1- g 69 6 � CE Pr 1S P< 1'[ pRo G1 is [1 +v
L't-r.- -ra-• v- a -CV- r1 dE CC Y ss am re 79 is R ; Cv
K
i2-91 v-r1- 11 I rr 91 C7 rS 1 C'G Y L Qt Ev K ra r1 Y it ry
9
5-"T- si9-"-rl-rv- L2. WC 61c t LS D2 '2 'L r[ •'L r, it
CTiE-PC-7'i-I'I-6¢IY-C1- Cv r9 Vt 61 LZ rc r. 7+ r r1 rt iZ it
fE-T. .E-K-T1-rV- rl 91 27 72 2 r2 9T C. rr CS K r9 C'9 G9 rL 1 T[ 9 r2
CM• .T-LZ-61-a1V• n-[}Cv n Ca •1 R r6 L1 TT ET 7T y 99 L9 r7 I'L R
•'�('• Li�-.7-6}C 69-942¢ rD 9v r1a'3.�R LE s'. Pr L2 L1 nLb
y.Y •9 LA YL
• LEE-VE-61-r1 CVVV 9'1 T2.E 6T C. rr .; ►; sE "r7 .969 CL T¢
o a
r9<-c«.c.-rTK7-n-64L}ra.Ev z1 n 91 c1 a cz o 6 to n c9 6-9 rc T. cv
0
n ar s4 e'c 12 r• T. rs �P,s�ct T Ta a'L • ro
K r-rrt[--61-61-L1-•1-a]- 7-.C9- EV ZD 9.r7 n
r[-6'f.I1-.I#t- C7fi7-E7-rF-t2-ri '�l�ar.� ra TI n " 17 Or�'C 0,• •S CS
s'L rc-T.-r.-7E-11- - - -6rnS-arrP CV Cl r2 PE L ri rE . iUr 1, r. 6. n
0
CL- •Li-.-K-•T-IT-Zs-t'2-r7-n-91-a- n- +¢ tv-TP [ n 1`3 T al rt h . s Cq
Z'[- rFS- aYiE-C.- - - We- C1-i-1-R-sa- n-.V- Vt r] DZ '2 rE r[ It SS c.1
ct L-rs-• r.-aG-rr-9+-i'.-6EKE-VE-LY-[L-C1-12-•'2-L]- - 6' - 6'7 WE '1
tL L-.Tl -rr----[S-L+••Y-IY-IY�(,iBsF'i - 9 r1
r�Jlla(f/
-94 [4 .1 2i7-47-['2•YI-La-Zp- 9a Y LT L'l7 ro
n-r[-aL-rTS1-lY-=S-CY-rY-iT-[Y�F{iZ-h-6p-[2-r'r�i- - 0�'D 17r 911¢
6-9[-C'L-.9-9'C-LSyY-KKL-aC-ss-6Y-[E-•TES-oF-Ci-r?-Ct-V1-2tFrv- CD 91-r1-L¢
a9-CL-oY-60•9 4-[9-99-[ --rsir-T.-G.-6T iYKz-Cr-L'1-6}L¢
11-
-•'t-61-n-rs-[4
r1-L1-P2-.'2{Z-q2�_rYiY�Z-V¢49-r9-47;9H9iS-L'f- 2-Cf-CE-LZKZ-R-
IS IaC'0-rl-ni'i-r[HE-rf-E'.1'.-6'G-I;i' 6'1-rE{i•L1-6q-1¢
r}6'1-LE -rf- 2- '1-a4[q-9}Zp-
TV-TIyE-rE Z- 1-
w.
)NO �J- b n 7 �?'v 7 --� -) 1� o x,4 v jv O 11'd n v g X a
C�: --ff :V11 s