20040584 Ver 1_Complete File_20040413

i
I
?0? WA TF9Q Michael F. Easley
?O G Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 6, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-0584
Wake County
Grover Construction I
Attention: Jerry Gower
324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
Subject: 401 Water Quality Cetification
Emerald Pointe
1 Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Sirs:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within
or otherwise impact 0.3253 acres of wetlands, 217 feet of streams, including the temporary impacts to 0.2537
acres of wetlands anI 105 linear feet of stream for the purpose of the construction of Emerald Pointe
Residential Subdivision in Knightdale at the subject property, as described within your application, additional
information letter from S&EC dated July 13, 2004 and the additional information letter from S&EC dated
November 9, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3374 and 3402 (GC3374 and GC3402). These Certifications
allows you to use Nationwide Permits 12 and 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian
buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233 where applicable. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and Construction Stormwater regulations. Also,
this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in
your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
i
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506
(h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
I
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 4
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions
of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 217 (feet) (and 105 temporary impacts)
404/LAMA Wetlands .3253 (acres) (and.2537 temporary impacts)
Waters (acres)
Buffers (square ft.)
2. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand
that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been
determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until the EEP
receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office),
no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at
[phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have one
month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund to meet the
following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Sub-basin
Number
Stream 217 (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Waters (acres)
3. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures
must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of
the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all
construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
j i
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 3 of 4
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, land maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the'reclamation in accordance
with the r'eouirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
4. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, sp il, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts described within your application, additional information letter from S&EC
dated July 133 2004 and the additional information letter from S&EC dated November 9, 2004. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and
erosion contr?l Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water
quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
5. Site restoration, mitigation, enhancement, and stormwater management as listed in your application,
additional information letter from S&EC dated July 13, 2004 and the additional information letter from
S&EC dated November 9, 2004 must be completed by March 1, 2005.
6. Remediation Completion Report. Within 60 days of the completion of the restoration plan a written report
must be provide to DWQ detailing the result of the restoration efforts.
7. Monitoring Fregifency. Monitoring will be required twice per year, for all on-site restoration,
enhancement, stormwater management locations located on the tract and depicted in the November 9,
2004, letter from your consultant S&EC (Sean Clark) and the Emerald Point Subdivision Phase III,
Enlarged Erosion Control Plan, dated October 21, 2004.
8. Monitoring must occur during the months of August and January. A report must include a field inspection
and written accounts. It must minimally include a determination of whether measures (including
stormwater management) and efforts constructed as a part of the restoration efforts have failed or are
failing, if diffuse -flow is being achieved from the level spreaders and if planting efforts have failed or are
not surviving. This information must be available for DWQ review upon request as well as provided to
DWQ during the annual reporting requirements. If problems are encountered they must be documented by
digital photographs, a written account/determination must be developed and this information must be
provided to DWQ for review within 30 days.
9. Monitorinjz-Trig_?ered Repairs or Corrections. If monitoring efforts by the Emerald Point or DWQ
inspections confi?m areas have become unstable, if measures constructed as a part of the restoration and
stormwater management efforts have failed or are failing, and if planting efforts have failed or are not
surviving, if areas are rilled, sloughing, or eroding the applicant must undertake repairs or corrections
immediately (within 20 days of the observation or notification by DWQ). The repair efforts must be
photographed byI'the applicant and a record (including dates) of the repairs must be maintained and
included as apart of the reporting requirements.
10. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters
and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 4 of 4
impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be
downloaded from the 40l/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the
sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project.
11. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of
completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C.
27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to
review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Danny Smith at 919-733-5083 ext. 353.
Sin erely,
f ?
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures: GC 3402, GC 3374
Certificate of Completion
cc:
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
040584EmeraldPoint(Wake)401

i
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
November 9, 2004 .
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
I
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. Danny Smith bl?
C/\/
2321 Crabfree Blvd. /f
Parkview Boulevard ` l U
Raleigh, NC 27604
y I
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's September 9, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr. Smith:
This letter?is in response to the DWQ letter dated September 9, 2004 (copy attached),
which requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision.
The follo ' ing responses correspond with the numbered requests on your letter.
1. The impact areas within Phases 1 and 2 exist and cannot be replanted or mitigated
fo? onsite with the exception of Impact 16. Impact 16 is currently in riprap. The
rip rap in this area will be removed by hand and the area will be planted and
revegetated using species listed below. The replanting within Impact 16 (2120 ft2)
a 2 well as within the previously graded Impacts 3 (1359 ft), 6 (1193 ft), 12 (1719
ft ), and 13 (1255 ftn) can begin as soon as the 401-certification is issued. The
ex?sting temporary impacts (Impacts 9, 10, and 11) have already been seeded.
Tl a remaining proposed temporary impacts (Impacts 2, 4, 7, and 14,) are to be
se?ded as soon as the 401-certification has been issued and the utility lines have
been installed. Because Impacts 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 14 are utility line corridors,
maintenance (i.e. mowing) of these areas will be required and so the planting of
shy ub and/or tree species is not proposed. Impacts 5 and 15 will be permanent
road impacts and cannot therefore be replanted, however as submitted to your
office in the previous submittal, the NC-EEP will accept payment to mitigate for
these impacts offsite.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
sJ Y
Schedule for implementation of restoration
As stated above the areas that can be replanted immediately will be as soon as the
401-certification has been issued (within two to three weeks of the issuance of the.
401). Areas that request the installation of a utility line such as Impacts 2, 4, 7, .
and 14 will be seeded immediately after the utility has been installed, which in
turn will begin immediately after the issuance of the 401-certification. All of the
proposed activities will require some mobilization time, which is accounted for in
the 2-3 week period.
3 year monitoring plan
The hydrology of the previously cleared areas has not been altered and therefore
monitoring the hydrology is not proposed. Although wetland vegetation currently
exists in the disturbed areas it is by enlarge herbaceous vegetation so the planting
of shrub and tree species is being proposed as enhancement. The success of the
planted vegetation should be monitored and the proposed methodology is as
follows.
1. A total often (10) vegetation-monitoring plots will be installed and
monitored on the 5 replanted wetland areas (i.e. two plots for each area).
2. Due to the small areas being replanted the standard l Om x l Om square is
not feasible. Vegetative monitoring plots will be circles with a 4-foot
radius (i.e. 1/100 acre) and will be monitored twice a year.. This size is in
keeping with the current monitoring standards used on other restoration
sites.
3. Monitoring plots will evaluate the success of tree, shrub, and herbaceous
.species within a given plot.
4. A vegetative success criteria of 320 stems per acre will be required at the
end of the three (3) year monitoring period for forest and woody shrub
planting plots.
The wetland areas being replanted will be planted with 320 stems per acre so as to
ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more than 20% of anyone species
will be planted. Tree species included in the planting will resemble those found in
the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet gum, Elm, Willow
Oak, etc. Shrub species can include Tag Alder, Silky Dogwood, Elderberry, Spice
Bush, and Witch Hazel. The herbaceous layer will be seeded with native wetland
vegetation seed mix. Other than Impact 6 there are no currently impacted
channels that will require onsite restoration. The wetland areas adjacent to Impact
6 were cleared.and the stream channel became unstable immediately following the
clearing. At the time of the last site visit (+/- 4 months from the date of this
letter), the stream in this area had begun to stabilize and reform. Instead of
disturbing the stream channel further for the purpose of restoring it, we propose
c
z f f
tha the most beneficial action towards stabilizing the stream would be
revegetating the surrounding wetland areas. All previously impacted areas have
been seeded in order to temporarily stabilize the areas.
2. Please find a copy of the project engineer's impervious calculations for the project.
The impervious calculations are provided for the final unbuilt phase (phase 3) and
total 21.29%. The impervious area for the entire project including the final phase is
26.71 °/ .
3. Th attached large sheets provide information concerning the stormwater
management for the final phase of the project. As discussed in the August 10, 2004
office meeting level spreaders are being placed at the stormwater outlets in Phase 3 to
reduce!the likelihood of erosive concentrated flow entering the stream channels at the
discharge points. The information/calculations used to determine and properly size
the proposed level spreaders on Phase 3 are on Sheet 3 of the attached large sheets.
Please call, or email me at SClark ,SandEC.com if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincerely,
Sean Clary'
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (September 9, 2004)
Calculations of impervious surface area
Phase 3 plans showing level spreaders etc (3 sheets)
Overall map showing areas to be replanted
nFV4A
QG
1
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
September 9, 2004
Registered 1V[ai1
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Construction
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
1 ?
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt
of your Pre-construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for Emerald Pointe Subdivision located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this
office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003, Notice of Violation issued to you from the
Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
I
After review of this information, the DWQ requested additional information. A written
response to this request was received on July 13, 2004. Further, you and your consultants meet with
NCDENR legal council for the Department and DWQ staff on August 10, 2004 regarding the
remaining concerns on this project. After this review we believe that your project should be place on
hold. We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project
to continue pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and
wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration
proposed, a schedule for implementation of the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in
your response. (Note: please specifically include the linear feet and areas, planting time table,
monitoring plan for each respective impact location).
2) Please provide the percent impervious surfaces for each phases of the subdivision.
3 Please provide plans that address stormwater management for Phase 3.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is
the understanding of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to
abate violations and stem or minimize the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty
Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of Violation, penalties of up to
$25,000.00 p q day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application
such that you may achieve project compliance.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information (items
1-3 above) is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume
you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
1 Water
ds
cc:
Program
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
NCDENR - Mary Penny Thompson
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
040584emeraldpt(wake)hold2.doc
i
X244>ui?x
( it A KQ' 743
99j
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR
EMERALD POINT SUBDIVISION
PHASE I, II, AND III
ITEM S. F. AC.
PUBLIC ROADWAYS 516,606 11.86 (10.40%)
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS 82,725 1.90 (1.660/6)
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 564,000 12.95 (11.36%)
(includes rooftops, decks, and driveways)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA =1,163,331 26.71
26.71 AC (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA) = 23.43% IMPERVIOUS AREA
114.0 AC (TOTAL SITE)
PHASE III ONLY
ITEM S. F. AC.
PUBLIC ROADWAYS 1569497 3.59 (11.18°/x)
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS 25,375 0.58 (1.81%)
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 144,000 3.31 (10.31%)
(includes rooftops, decks, and driveways)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 325,829 7.48
7.48 AC (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA) = 23.29% IMPERVIOUS AREA
32.11 AC (TOTAL SITE)
Public3Uerry GoweAEmerald Point Phase Umpervious Area Calc.doc
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: lvl. anny Smith
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
November 9, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
L V '
V
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's September 9, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr. Smith:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated September 9, 2004 (copy attached),
which requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision.
The following responses correspond with the numbered requests on your letter.
1. The impact areas within Phases 1 and 2 exist and cannot be replanted or mitigated
for onsite with the exception of Impact 16. Impact 16 is currently in riprap. The
riprap in this area will be removed by hand and the area will be planted and
revegetated using species listed below. The replanting within Impact 16 (2120 ft2)
as well as within the previously graded Impacts 3 (1359 ft2), 6 (1193 ft2), 12 (1719
ft), and 13 (1255 ft) can begin as soon as the 401-certification is issued. The
existing temporary impacts (Impacts 9, 10, and 11) have already been seeded.
Tl a remaining proposed temporary impacts (Impacts 2, 4, 7, and 14,) are to be
seeded as soon as the 401-certification has been issued and the utility lines have
been installed. Because Impacts 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 14 are utility line corridors,
maintenance (i.e. mowing) of these areas will be required and so the planting of
sh}ub and/or tree species is not proposed. Impacts 5 and 15 will be permanent
road impacts and cannot therefore be replanted, however as submitted to your
office in the previous submittal, the NC-EEP will accept payment to mitigate for
these impacts offsite.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone:, [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
.Schedule for implementation of restoration
As stated above the areas that can be replanted immediately will be as soon as the
401-certification has been issued (within two to three weeks of the issuance of the
401). Areas that request the installation of a utility line such as Impacts 2, 4, 7,
and 14 will be seeded immediately after the utility has been installed, which in
turn will begin immediately after the issuance of the 401-certification. All of the
proposed activities will require some mobilization time, which is accounted for in
the 2-3 week period.
3 year monitoring plan
The hydrology of the previously cleared areas has not been altered and therefore
monitoring the hydrology is not proposed. Although wetland vegetation currently
exists in the disturbed areas it is by enlarge herbaceous vegetation so the planting
of shrub and tree species is being proposed as enhancement. The success of the
planted vegetation should be monitored and the proposed methodology is as
follows.
1. A total of ten (10) vegetation-monitoring plots will be installed and
monitored on the 5 replanted wetland areas (i.e. two plots for each area).
2. Due to the small areas being replanted the standard 10m x 10m square is
.not feasible. Vegetative monitoring plots will be circles with a 4-foot
radius (i.e. 1/100 acre) and will be monitored twice a year. This size is in
keeping with the current monitoring standards used on other restoration
sites.
3. Monitoring plots will evaluate the success of tree, shrub, and herbaceous
species within a given plot.
4. A vegetative success criteria of 320 stems per acre will be required at the
end of the three (3) year monitoring period for forest and woody shrub
planting plots.
The wetland areas being replanted will be planted with 320 stems per acre so as to
ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more than 20% of any one species
will be planted. Tree species included in the planting will resemble those found in
the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet gum, Elm, Willow
Oak, etc. Shrub species can include Tag Alder, Silky Dogwood, Elderberry, Spice
Bush, and Witch Hazel. The herbaceous layer will be seeded with native wetland
vegetation seed mix. Other than Impact 6 there are no currently impacted
channels that will require onsite restoration. The wetland areas adjacent to Impact
6 were cleared and the stream channel became unstable immediately following the
clearing. At the time of the last site visit (+/- 4 months from the date of this.
letter), the stream in this area had begun to stabilize and reform. Instead of
disturbing the stream channel further for the purpose of restoring it, we propose
the most beneficial action towards stabilizing the stream would be
getating the surrounding wetland areas. All previously impacted areas have
i seeded in order to temporarily stabilize the areas.
2. Plet se find a copy of the project engineer's impervious calculations for the project.
The unpervious calculations are provided for the final unbuilt phase (phase 3) and
total 23.29%. The impervious area for the entire project including the final phase is
26.71%.
3. The attached large sheets provide information concerning the stormwater
management for the final phase of the project. As discussed in the August 10, 2004
office meeting level spreaders are being placed at the stormwater outlets in Phase 3 to
reduc? the likelihood of erosive concentrated flow entering the stream channels at the
discharge points. The information/calculations used to determine and properly size
the proposed level spreaders on Phase 3 are on Sheet 3 of the attached large sheets.
Please call or email me at SClarkPSandEC.com if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (September 9, 2004)
Calculations of impervious surface area
Phase 3 plans showing level spreaders etc (3 sheets)
Overall map showing areas to be replanted
September 9, 2004
Mail
eipt Requested
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On ' Aril 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt
of your Pre- onstruction Notification Application of your r?quest for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for Emerald Pointe Subdivision located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this
office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003, Notice 'of Violation issued to you from the
Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
After review of this information, the DWQ requested additional information. A written
response to this request was received on July 13, 2004. Further, you and your consultants meet with
NCDENR legal council for the Department and DWQ staff on August 10, 2004 regarding the
remaining cgncerns on this project. After this review we believe that your project should be place on
hold. We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project
to continue pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and
wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration
proposed, a schedule for implementation of the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in
your response. (Note: please specifically include the linear feet and areas, planting time table,
monitoring plan for each respective impact location).
2) Please provide the percent impervious surfaces for each phases of the subdivision.
1
3) Please provide plans that address stormwater management for Phase 3.
A No? ce of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is
the understan ding of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to
abate violations and stem or minimize the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty
Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of Violation, penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-7331786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetiands/
i
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application
such that you may achieve project compliance.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information (items
1-3 above) is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume
you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Program
ds
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
NCDENR - Mary Penny Thompson
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
040584emeraldpt(wake)hold2.doc
6
Ma dr, tvt yyr LAQ.
4?3244Yi1YC il11 t
1ix:i? ?)
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR
EMERALD POINT SUBDIVISION
PIIASE L II, AND III
ITEM S. F. AC.
PUBLIC ROADWAYS 516,606 11.86 (10.40%)
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS 82,725 1.90 (1.66%)
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 564,000 12.95 (11.36%)
(includes rooftops, decks, and driveways)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA =1,163,331 26.71
26.71 AC (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA) = 23.43% IMPERVIOUS AREA
114.0 AC (TOTAL SITE)
ITEM
PUBLIC ROADWAYS
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS
PHASE III ONLY
S. F.
156,497
25,375
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 144,000
(includes rooftops, decks, and driveways)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 325,829
AC.
3.59 (11.18%)
0.58 (1.81%)
3.31 (10.31%)
7.48
7.48 AC (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAL= 23.29% IMPERVIOUS AREA
32.11 AC (TOTAL SITE)
Public3Uery Gower\Emerald Point Phase Umpervious Area Calc.doc
-4-1 o
9932 Sam/
WETLANDS:
5op\ 1359 SQ. FT. -? 27
190 \
274
\ CATEGORIES
® A-EXISTING (i,-., no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED (t? be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
/
C- TEMPO rvaAP?,' (LXIS7;'tiC;. a'r-3dy ti.;th
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3 j
weeks after 401 issuance)
276
® E-PROPOSED JPERMANENT-no onsite restoration) L
® F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted) E\
GRAPHIC SCALE;
1 » 50' zr r
i 50 0 50 100 u?', OCH
I Y v co , COO
iN,
C) (o
i 254
I Co
\
1751
A e +7 ?
-7, 5
7 ~ ` / 253 ?
Cifilil?l M
A IMPACT 3

IMPACT 7
co-X/
C-TEMPORARY
5' .-TRAP OIDALP 1 t C P C S E t?)
?HIANNEL ITH ! ;
.CLASS,
- --------------- - ---------------------
:RII? k AP TLA DS:
84 SQ. FT.
?-
, _-_Ci IANNEL:
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
IMPACT 8
B-CLEARED 1 1
WETLANDS:
76 SQ. FT.
Lf) 3 L`N, FT,
F. . S. 12
M PACT 6 /- - -
-940. ?.I 20
SANI7gR
SEE B- LEAKED Y' ?!?' S ?S- N
WETLANDS
1193 SQ. FT
CHANNEL
B.#1 5
32 !LI N .. FT.
oP-ooo:0°
V IN.--295.51
INV OUT=29
0 PRIVATE DAR IMAGE; EASE T
CATEGORIES \
i
%% //? A-EXISTING (i.e., no outside restoration)
E\
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
? C-f rM?GRAf 3- Y (c?iST? `?E? ,.:Gy O.7 with ; v? :,;tat nt
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (rarap will be moved by hand and the area \rmll be replanted)
?. ( _..., . _. ?? r m J11 1 1",1 is I III I
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 "( = 50'
50 100

i
? !I
z
?I
I
PRIVA ? - -
20' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT- • - -.-._ ..._
(TYP) ?.
10,560 =2 .8
TNy IN- 4-55
A-EXISTING ,i.e., no outside restoration)
L ??1 I
® -CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
--O 1 R`! (EXIST NG-aiready L-cd d ,.':I '; Ce ? -e et
D-TEMPOR RY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 01 issuance)
i
® E-PROPOSE (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area 4,till be replanted)
'CAL"KAr_'t\IT LTVD \\ \ \\\\\\

NcS
------- IMPACT 14 IMPACT 13
D-TEM PORARY B-CLEARED
WETLANDS:
(PRO POED )
DS : 1255 SQ. FT.
i
WETL
AN
871 S: Q. ET.
_ - --__-
1
2f '4?
r 24 L Fy2-36"ReP®1 00% <\
28_ _
tIII x
}
aANI- I ARY I? Pu,su
-
S G
FR
E F EASEIy#T.., ?Itr
ASE
-\ EN
(GYP)
.92
04•:36 ` TRAP #20
71
(9 -C.B.#24
P = 30.7"p
3033 9,607 S.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 50'
50 0 50 100 8, 272 S. F.
CATEGORIES
A-EXISTING no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED (t 1 be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
;7,077 S.F.
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 4 cl1 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
-; i
F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted) ?
I 8,728 S.F. II V IIII Iii
I 9,108'S;F:~,

FES-

Im
A--
W
10
21
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 50'
50 0 50 100
1
CATEGORIES
1 j2ji A-EXIST INu i.e., no outside restoration)
I.
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
C TE',1PORA.I?Y EXIST??d?. ?r adv __ : G t?? n f;f cecus, _ at.0n)
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
-` ? F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area wiii be replanted)
1-
II

%C7
217
D
218
219
Nov M FMNERL9
.A PORE . PROPERTY
DB 1064 PAGE In
PIN 1133D1-70-6649
- Nov OR FOR.ERLY
-ES TDVLE R, PROPERTY
GB 2391 PAGE 299
? T CRF
M ffJlTEIyDE !f
NOW OR FURS
ANTIENETTE Pq
DD 22)6 P
PIN 1)6303-
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 300'
300 0 300 600
1 \
1
NOV OR EDNCRLT
RNOTT PART( LTD. PAR TNERSIIIP
DB 5946 PAGE 953
PIN 173 --89-33%
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
NC Di
Attn: T
2321 C
Sion of Water Quality
. Danny Smith
Lbtree Blvd.
November 9, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
Y
y: 7
ILI
Parkvie?'y Boulevard IRaleigh NC 27604
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's September 9, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision. in Knightdale, Wake County,
North C olina
Dear Mr. Smith:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated September 9, 2004 (copy attached),
which requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision.
The following responses correspond with the numbered requests on your letter.
1
1. The impact areas within Phases 1 and 2 exist and cannot be replanted or mitigated
for onsite with the exception of Impact 16. Impact 16 is currently in riprap. The
riprap in this area will be removed by hand and the area will be planted and
revegetated using species listed below. The replanting within Impact 16 (2120 ft2)
as well as within the previously graded Impacts 3 (1359 ft ), 6 (1193 f ), 12 (1719
fft ), and 13 (1255 ft2) can begin as soon as the 401-certification is issued. The
existing temporary impacts (Impacts 9, 10, and 11) have already been seeded.
The remaining proposed temporary impacts (Impacts 2, 4, 7, and 14,) are to be
seeded as soon as the 401-certification has been issued and the utility lines have
been installed. Because Impacts 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 14 are utility line corridors,
maintenance (i.e. mowing) of these areas will be required and so the planting of
shrub and/or tree species is not proposed. Impacts 5 and 15 will be permanent
road impacts and cannot therefore be replanted, however as submitted to your
office in. the previous submittal, the NC-EEP will accept payment to mitigate for
ese impacts offsite.
Charlotte Office: I Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite G 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] ; Phone:. [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
V
Schedule for implementation of restoration
As stated above the areas that can be replanted immediately will be as soon as the
401-certification has been issued (within two to three weeks of the issuance of the
401). Areas that request the installation of a utility line such as Impacts 2,-4, 7,
and 14 will be seeded immediately after the utility has been installed, which in
turn will begin immediately after the issuance of the 401-certification. All of the
proposed activities will require some mobilization time, which is accounted for in
the 2-3 week period.
3 year monitoring plan
The hydrology of the previously cleared areas has not been altered and therefore
monitoring the hydrology is not proposed. Although wetland vegetation currently
exists in the disturbed areas it is by enlarge herbaceous vegetation so the planting
of shrub and tree species is being proposed as enhancement. The success of the
planted vegetation should be monitored and the proposed methodology is as
follows.
1. A total often (10) vegetation-monitoring plots will be installed and
monitored on the 5 replanted wetland areas (i.e. two plots for each area).
2. Due to the small areas being replanted the standard IOm x l Om square is
.not feasible. Vegetative monitoring plots will be circles with a 4-foot
radius (i.e. 1/100 acre) and will be monitored twice a year. This size is in
keeping with the current monitoring standards used on other restoration
sites.
3. Monitoring plots will evaluate the success of tree, shrub, and herbaceous
species within a given plot.
4. A vegetative success criteria of 320 stems per acre will be required at the
end of the three (3) year monitoring period for forest and woody shrub
planting plots.
The wetland areas being replanted will be planted with 320 stems per acre so as to
ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more than 20% of any one species
will be planted. Tree species included in the planting will resemble those found in
the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet gum, Elm, Willow
Oak, etc. Shrub species can include Tag Alder, Silky Dogwood, Elderberry, Spice
Bush, and Witch Hazel. The herbaceous layer will be seeded with native wetland
vegetation seed mix. Other than Impact 6 there are no currently impacted
channels that will require onsite restoration. The wetland areas adjacent to Impact
6 were cleared and the stream channel became unstable immediately following the
clearing. At the time of the last site visit (+/- 4 months from the date of this.
letter), the stream in this area had begun to stabilize and reform. Instead of
disturbing the stream channel further for the purpose of restoring it, we propose
V
that the most beneficial action towards stabilizing the stream would be
evegetating the surrounding wetland areas. All previously impacted areas have
een seeded in order to temporarily stabilize the areas.
2. Please find a copy of the project engineer's impervious calculations for the project.
The impervious calculations are provided for the final unbuilt phase (phase 3) and
totall,23.29%. The impervious area for the entire project including the final phase is
26.71I1 %.
I
3. 1 e attached large sheets provide information concerning the stormwater
management for the final phase of the project. As discussed in the August 10, 2004
office meeting level spreaders are being placed at the stormwater, outlets in Phase 3 to
reduce the likelihood of erosive concentrated flow entering the stream channels at the
discharge points. The information/calculations used to determine and properly size
the proposed level spreaders on Phase 3 are on Sheet 3 of the attached large sheets.
Please c 1 or email me at SClark(a,SandEC.com if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
1
Sincerely,
Sean C ark
Enviro ental Scientist
7
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (September 9, 2004)
Calculations of impervious surface area
Phase 3 plans showing level spreaders etc (3 sheets)
Overall map showing areas to be replanted
IV
r
-1
'C
,.? t cr v
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siem? ns Rd.
Wendell, I C 27591
September 9, 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt
of your Pre ,construction Notification Application of your r?quest for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for Emerald Pointe Subdivision located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this
office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003, Notice of Violation issued to you from the
Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
AfteI review of this information, the DWQ requested additional information. A written
response to this request was received on July 13, 2004. Further, you and your consultants meet with
NCDENR legal council for the Department and DWQ staff on August 10, 2004 regarding the
remaining concerns on this project. After this review we believe that your project should be place on
hold. We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project
to continue pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please pl ovide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and
wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration
proposed, a schedule for implementation of the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in
your response. (Note: please specifically include the linear feet and areas, planting time table,
monitoring plan for each respective impact location).
2) Please provide the percent impervious surfaces for each phases of the subdivision.
3) Please !ovide plans that address stormwater management for Phase 3.
pr
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is
the understanding of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to
abate violations and stem or minimize the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty
Assessments As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of Violation, penalties of up to
$25,000.00 pier day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NO 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NO 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
W . n
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application
such that you may achieve project compliance.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information (items
1-3 above) is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume
you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
ds
cc:
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Uirice
NCDENR - Mary Penny Thompson
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poopart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
Program
040584emeraldpt(wake)hold2.doc

1 .'m
" C
1
r
$t# I? i?S(.i914mr
4924_$3\'lWiQd11'?° IPi3?Y
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR
EMERALD POINT SUBDIVISION
PHASE I, H. AND III
ITEM S. F. AC.
PUBLIC ROADWAYS 516,606 11.86 (10.40%)
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS 82,725 1.90 (1.66%)
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 564,000 12.95 (11.36%)
(includes rooftops, decks, and driveways)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA =1,163,331 26.71
26.71 AC (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA) = 23.43% IMPERVIOUS AREA
114.0 AC (TOTAL SITE)
PHASE HI ONLY
ITEM S. F. AC.
PUBLIC ROADWAYS 156,497 3.59 (11.18%)
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS 25,375 0.58 (1.81%)
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 144,000 3.31 (10.31%)
(includes rooftops, decks, and driveways)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 325,829 7.48
7.48 AC (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA) = 23.29% IMPERVIOUS AREA
32.11 AC (TOTAL SITE)
Public3\Jer y Gower\Emerald Point Phase 3\Impervious Area Calc.doc
0
.?T 2
APCRA i
DOSED) I
-ANDS:
Q. FT. ,
,. ;` . AC- 3
9_z/, 1B
9932 5i,
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 50'
M
C) N
50 0 50 100 "ifs CN ! ?SS? S
r?
- r
`.i2 254-
Ln V-)
00
???
r 253
IMPACT 3 /
B-CLEARED
,9 l WETLANDS:
1359 SQ. FT. -?
X50
190 \ \ 27
189 274
1 k f \ l? I
h IES1111
v
\ ®A-EXIsTING(i?e., no outside restoration) i
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
C-TEMPORAuu?l' iE {ISTIING u rcacv se__`vo \. ;h .,. Uc C _ a:.G
/ D-TEMPORA Y (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3 \\
weeks after 4 1 issuance) f X73
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration) 9
® F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)
\ \ \ , ?\\\ \\ \ \V&
GRAPHIC SCALE
1° = 50'
50 0 50 100
IMPACT 8 1
B-CLEARED 1 1
WETLANDS:
7 6 SQ. FT.
1193 SQ. FT.
CHANNEL:
32LIN. FT.
ai
2`0' PRIVATE D\R
00,
.B.#15
OP=000:00
V IN=295.51 / ;-
INV OUT=29J5:41--
INAGEEASE T

1fi? A-EXISTING (i.e., no outside restoration)
??GE
P?
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
C- "v, ORARY t.E.ba, Ecu ??.,?Ea:!on;
? D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
! i i li F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)
GRAPHIC SCALE
1'1 = 50'
50 0 ! 50 100
IMPACT 12
B -'CLEARED
CATEGORIES
A-EXISTIN I i .e., no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARE (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance) /
C . EM OR.i RY (-XiSTING <.. ,,ac y .riled w'h : rba ou vegetation)
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
/ rtT -? F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)
,r
t
fiat -
IMPACT 13 ?-
IMPACT 1 4
------__ ---?---- - --- -- - B-C LEAK E D
D-TEMP RAR_ '
- -
-- -- --- ------ -- ---
; SED) WETLANDS1FTL.AN DS: 1255 SQ . FT.
871 FT.
r "
..-...........- __---.----_-..-_........-_,...-.-. _..___......-... .?.._------- ..... _...... ......... _-._.... ........_?,..... ....._._,.-,.... =
•t
.: .. ? .may
2 24. L F.;,2-3 "RCP®1.00
28•,
t :
I
fI ,1111
20,' S ITARX # i I Puk
S EWE
? E-ASEMEll T"
,, , ...,
20- U TILI
E?4 MEN
S?
O (rP)
92
. 4.6
04:`36 TRAP #20 ?.
© -C.B.#24
QP - 307 Q? -
H ?
1? = 3E79,607 S.
I rn ,
GRAPHIC SCALE
50'
50 0 50 100 8,272 S. F.
CATEGORIES
-r -
A-EXISTING (i.e., no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
_ C-TE,'V`FORFaF?`f (EXIST:! G !.Friers %,it.n t r .t c?cu a?i tion; 7,077 S.F.
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
1L F-RP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)
u
II 1 IIII III `,.
I 8,728 S. F.
9,108 S:-
ST?4.2 24+65.33
r
24+42
95 LT
F
143. .'?
I __146+
i
IMPACT 16 -
j F-RIP-RAPPED ?1
157 ' r V !t
AREA
ROCKS TO BE 10
i
REMOVED BY
HAND:
56
2120 SQ. FT. 21
GRAPHIC SCALE f
I 1" = 50' I
Z7
0 217
501 0 50 100
I
CATEGORIES
j? A-EXISTING (Le-, no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance) y 218
- ? r
h herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with
weeks after 4 1 issuance)
® E-PROPOSE (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
F-RIP-RAPPE AREA (nprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)
? f i 219
NOV cR FDRNERLY \ \ \
A ?' ( cc1ART PROPERTY \
1 PIN 175 D4-93-1551
\ 1 f1
1 1258 E- BJ ? F
t727 D4
l I B JII \ _
L7 a\a ass I L- . I L _ I I?I I U l r. _ .I I? 11 / /` \\ j\
'? ? ? I ? II ? .. 1 1?? I '• j i ' III ? ? 'I I • 'I 11 I I - 1 I I I I I II I ? - - / r \ J / \ \ \ .?,.,.
>I Ir> I Ir.. " I ? I L_J L J ?' d •„Ls•. `c-- / / ? \ \L-3 1
I _J L_J L_J L J L__J ,?. _ t1
1 --? _ ??=' 'K'r?--1 r-r r ?? r L_-? , j f ,. i i •• "'-` ??/".> ? `? 1? J \µ
1 I - I I I I 11 I I' I I ' 1-j f 1ASt11j3
_-J L_ _ P 6tW -'' I_, I I y c
-J ? ? -I I 7/?? c___,'k1P.SElb/?-1 _ = I •I 1 7
i -l ?J lwu// \ II> I _ III •
? ? ./ -f ? Li-(:LFAIID 1 1
Yl, . r- ) ? ? / I ,,!! / , r•• _ Y C _ ? WETIANU
>r I r
! ---J f? ( 1 4..? '? ,••>. .. \ ?. M Acre
r 1 -?> ??.?? 1 r IMaACra H-?
I ?! a-a r Af+m k-- r- ?•? t e CI F ro fa.,.
_.. i I•.,,-_? ? ?? ' ? //?,`.h? J? wtlLnNtu? \ ? wLrl.nNCZ, T""?\
% ?.,7 \?J(?• - ??% \ /rr\I - ' i \ C'. ?I- " ?\?. \ > \\ O? - \ .MKtaY OR FORMERLY
?v ^• \ \ \ 7 ,.r+ * S FEVLER, PROPERTY
fE ?` / • ?`v i n\ \ \?,'' ; -_ _, .'?/ 1 \, ??, BB 2391 Phu 299
)6543-12-361]
/ ,//' v C ) ?) v . ?n\ \ \_-2 IM n r 13 111\ 1 1 7 ?!
? J ?) >?v) ?r ?' [? ?? r > v t D<IEn ILD 11 1 J E J 1 f T?
?,?? i / 1?1 (1 //? ^ \ C/ ?' ? \ [ \ ?.\ \ /?. 3 - - rII - _ WErLANLb-. , L. r--J 1 J t• 141 ??
I \ \ // v //. ' \ < u.u ? C .> \ . \ \ I .. ? 1? srJ. R r I > ? I - II I '??'?
1'' I , _ ?,/ / \) ? . \\ C \ ? ? N ?- r ? ,f,....?e .. ? l; - ? N,rornz I I;.?L ? ? },.
I 1 ?' ? C / ti' < ? \.+. ? \ - .{?.,- { ? sr `( \r•-E.,.. 'a 1+-c,LLnv,[.D I II
-• 1 ?\ > \ i^ v` />^ \' \? ^\ V ^I V . y -.- 1 Itl:.ca•. ^ ; ' r \ S ?'J. wEruNUS It
: ._?r..
W. F
,PROPERTT {- -\ I " ??'\ •` r 1 1 .?„• / 11 -s?.S t -. .___.____ 1 •> l .___._-_- }*1 #
DB 1 IISS06. E 128 I ?. 1 \ ( \ - 1 1 J?^ t _ - -__-_ 1i•' "' 1 •+ 1 ??
PM AI-70-6619 •I / ?? l2' 1 1 - / I ? r__ r-'I IL ?? ?1r E Lj"'1Y 1` , 1`-r'J sv?- _ - _ _ r l o ???
LL1 L _ _1 1 • 1 ICI I I I ! 1 - 11 r - 11 1 > 1 1 r.. j r ? -,1 r ? -1 - 1 - - __ • S3
1 L _J 1 1 I L.....? L MIS
v NB7 'Q 'W
- - -, r-- 1 rv L--J r?> r ?. I ?'' ;.,?.'-1 11\-- 1 u A •.
510w
IIf _? L--? L'-J 1ru1 1... 1 I I L--? - ?I
IL-
. 1 r r- •
r -l - >r--t?l r- Lu-J ?__ 1___r _? f r? 1 r-F I Ir,. I I 11 I I .. 11 \...u\\ \ `t w ?1 ??'s-4
I I . 1 1 > z I .u 1 I r. R 1 L"_•'_` •1 , r? I 1 r ' ul Irul I?ul Irv.ll II•>"11 ??> \ ????1\' °,„
I . J 1> .{ Irul j?I >I L°_J 1 > I of i.','-+?12 f--?J \c-? 11-\ \??' `Cu-°?f+'. '
- &,. i ,,; , --1 1 ,>.. i r-? 1 I .>u I L V_- L> . \._J l '••'" \ ?' mn 6 s
_-_ --• 1 .. 1 L.+? J L _ _ .? I • .. I L - J r =L it cLMrUaBC IF
I I I uI L -J =* ?r I u I> 1 ??rrl _ uu,-
• l - r ? / I ?yy.?w.3?a? ' • Ir u.? ..4' \ \J ` =-gyp '
f -i ,P[,r1, 1 J ?--i 1> I 1> \1\v (•.?.,.l l?` l? /^•u 1 MV OR FOR
a* \ J •>-l i [ M / ANTIONETTE
L _ _ J ! r _ ??r•J
'oW _-l 410C:KS TO OE 1 s.J 11 > J I r--- ., I >--, I 1 ?` \ J f ' 2276 P
__ - J r EXI$ 1146 1 ? I \ \ ??? ? ? / ? ?1 PIN IN 176303-
•
---"2 MANE 1 r _, .I I L_PI'4\ - r---, ^ 1 \ I Ip?_ _ ss ?
1. 2120 SO. R. I 1 1 L--J f _-1 r--1 ? I> 1 /??I -.- \
NOW OR FORMERLY _.T •, 1 > J L_-J r- , r--1 1 1 I I ?/
K1B]TT PARY LIM PARTNERSHIP 1 --J _ _J P L r -1 b 1> I I > I L __J I> ' L `?
BB 5916 PALO 955 J ? __ -.fir _, I > I ?L •J l-__J r --l 1 ,J r-fir ? ??J
PIN 175448-89-3396 --j
r _ 1 I> , L -•? L f' 1 I I I ? i t
L___J L_-J r___l (' 11 I I H J L_J
L- /
! {w...-d ' - r - -1 r -1 r - -'1 1 -'I i1 -'I 1 - II II - '1 11 - IY.,1+ II 1 , . 1
II L- ?-, r-- r-? r-? r?-I 1 1 1 1111 ' I 1 - 1 1 • 'I 11 ? I I 1 t• 111 ' - ?? II-?, EDGE SMANP
I 1 ? r-r r-?1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I• 1 1 1 1 L L. / I I
---J --1 III 111. I - II 11 • 11 II I 1 I I 1 I
r l r I I L- L? ?^?
I ?, I i 1. 11 J ONIr0liwc w1Ll(WwJ SWAMP
I` }+•' °'?. ' I? --------------- ?n
LLC ---------------
1 _----_---? ? -__ MB97f'YB•E I]34D4' - - - - -?
F--- - - NOV CIR F.-Y I -
1 ??..
SDIWtE B Pfd YERTY
Ot 2R46 PA[E 166 EYISTIMG C1NIN LDB( FFL)WC_EE
PIN 1734 AB-99-TSx
AL
294.1 v
_YL R?
GRAPHIC SCALE 294.' \
?
1 " = 300' 941
,300 0 300 600
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Co I Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
September 9, 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt
of your Pre-construction Notification Application of your r?quest for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for Emerald Pointe Subdivision located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this
office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003, Notice of Violation issued to you from the
Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
I
After review of this information, the DWQ requested additional information. A written
response to this request was received on July 13, 2004. Further, you and your consultants meet with
NCDENR legal council for the Department and DWQ staff on August 10, 2004 regarding the
remaining concerns on this project. After this review we believe that your project should be place on
hold. We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project
to continue pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please prLide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, str eamside area, and
wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration
proposed# a schedule for implementation of the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in
your response. (Note: please specifically include the linear feet and areas, planting time table,
monitoring plan for each respective impact location).
2) Please provide the percent impervious surfaces for each phases of the subdivision.
3) Please provide plans that address stormwater management for Phase 3.
1
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is
the understanding of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to
abate violations and stem or minimize the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty
Assessments. I As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of Violation; penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftpJ/h2o.enr.state.ne.uslncwetlands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application
such that you may achieve project compliance.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information (items
1-3 above) is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume
you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Program
ds
cc:
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Utrice
NCDENR - Mary Penny Thompson
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
040584emeraldpt(wake)hold2.doc
o o?Ar9QG
-1
J
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Construction
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, Ni-- 27591
September 9, 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs: j
1
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt
of your Pre-construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for Emerald Pointe Subdivision located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this
office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003, Notice of Violation issued to you from the
Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
i
After review of this information, the DWQ requested additional information. A written
response to this request was received on July 13, 2004. Further, you and your consultants meet with
NCDENR legal council for the Department and DWQ staff on August 10, 2004 regarding the
remaining concerns on this project. After this review we believe that your project should be place on
hold. We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project
to continue p ?rsuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and
wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration
proposed, a schedule for implementation of the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in
your response. (Note: please specifically include the linear feet and areas, planting time table,
monitorm plan for each respective impact location).
2) Please provide the percent impervious surfaces for each phases of the subdivision.
3) Please provide plans that address stormwater management for Phase 3.
i
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is
the understanding of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to
abate violation and stem or minimize the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty
Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of Violation, penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per Iday for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application
such that you may achieve project compliance.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information (items
1-3 above) is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume
you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Program
ds
cc:
Raleigh- DWt2 Regional Uttlce
NCDENR - Mary Penny Thompson
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
040584emeraldpt(wake)hold2.doc
VIVOq
3.00
F// 0/, y

---____-___ - - --- : -- ----

John J. Butler
Partner I
Telephone: [phone]
Direct Fax: [phone]
P.VRKER POEAD.201S & BERNSTEIN LLP.
Attorneys and Counselors at Lain
Wachovia Capitol Center
150 Fayetteville Street Mall
Suite 1400
Post Office Box 389
Raleigh, NC 27602-0389
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.parkerpoe.com
August 6, 2004
Mary Penn Thompson, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Division
Department Hof Justice
512 Salisbury Street
Archdale Building, 14th Floor
Raleigh, Nol-th Carolina 27699
Re: Jerry Gower Construction Company's Emerald Point Subdivision
Dear Mary Penny:
As vJe discussed on the phone earlier this week, I am writing to express my client's
position on why the Neuse Buffer Rules are not applicable to its Emerald Point Subdivision
development! As you noted in your letter of June 6, 2000, House Bill 1402 specifically
exempted property with existing vested rights from the application of the Neuse buffer rules.
Specifically, Section 1.7 of House Bill 1402 states that
The commission and the Department shall not apply [the Neuse!buffer rules] to
development with vested rights recognized or established ... prior to 22 July
1997.
Your letter of June 6, 2000 acknowledges that the Emerald Point Subdivision development had
such vested rights established prior to July 22, 1997. Therefore according to the plain language
of House Bill 1402, the Neuse River buffer rules do not apply to that development project.
Mr. Jon Dorney's letter of May 27, 2004 asserts that the subdivision is no longer exempt
from the buffer rules because the Knightdale authorization granting vested rights has expired,
and because there has been alleged water quality violations.
In the first place, according to the plain terms of House Bill 1402 if a project has vested
rights as of July 22, 1997, that project is exempt from the Neuse Buffer Rules notwithstanding
some later lapse in vested rights. In any event, the project's vested rights have never lapsed.
CHARLESTON, SC
CHAP LOTT1:, NC
COLUMBIA, SC
SPARTANBURG, SC
RAL 293157v1
i
i
Mary Penny Thompson, Esq.
August 6, 2004
Page 2
The special use permit granted by Knightdale in 1996 in favor of the Emerald Point
Subdivision which establishes the project's vested rights has not expired or otherwise become
void. Enc$osed for your review is a May 19, 2004 staff report from the Town of Knightdale
recommending a modification to the special use permit. The Town Council has approved that
recommendation. The May 19, 2004 staff report specifically acknowledges that the 1996 special
use permit is still in place.
i
s
You have said that you believe the special use permit expired by its own terms because
the Emerald Point Subdivision violates specific provisions of the permit. We believe this is not
the case. I enclose a copy of the special use permit, and we do not believe that there is evidence
that any of the conditions in this permit have been violated. In any event, the permit does not say
whether a violation of conditions would void it. On the contrary, the Knightdale Unified
Development Ordinance specifically provides how a special use permit may expire or be
revoked. See Knightdale Unified Development Ordinance, §§ 4.4.17.1 and 4.4.17.3 (copy
enclosed). The conditions for expiration under the ordinance have not occurred, and the Town
Council has'not taken action to revoke the special use permit. Thus, as,the Town of Knightdale
recently recognized in its staff report, the special use permit which has given this development
vested rights since 1996 is still in effect.
.I
We look forward to meeting with you on Tuesday, August 10, 2004 at 3:00 p.m. on the
14`h floor of the Archdale Building to have a full settlement discussion of all issues concerning
the Emerald Point Subdivision. We hope that following this meeting, we can agree on a prompt
timetable and set of conditions for issuing the 401 water quality certification and allowing Gower
Construction Company to move forward with Phase III of the Emerald Point Subdivision
development.
I
Thank you for your attention to this issue, and we look forward to seeing you on
Tuesday.
Si rely,
J J. JJB:act

Enclosures
cc:
Jerry Gower (w/ encls. via regular mail)
Sean Clark (w/ encls. via regular mail)
RAL 2931570
(Page 1 of 7)

1
i
i
j
rI
,I
's .
000224
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
PRESE!?1?•`•)
FC1t
96 OCT 20 PH 2: 23
UlillET1,
RRWAT.E?%r-pF TL ?y
NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
BK720 t PG0224
Prepared by and Return to:
Town of Knightdale
P.O. Box 640
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
On May 6, 1996 and June 19, 1996, the Knightdale Town Council held a public hearing to
consider the following application:
FILE NUMBER: S0196
OWNER. Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Road
Wendell, North Carolina 27591
}
Wayne Harper

4113 Brewster Drive
( Raleigh, N.C. 27606
PROPERTY LOCATION: East side of Old Knight Road, North of
Square D
WAKE COUNTY PIN: 1755.04 912724 and 1765.03 0128M
ZONING: Residential 7-Conditional Use District (167
CUD): This district is intended to provide
areas predominantly for single family
i .
development with a minimum lot size of .:-
8,300 square feu.
CURRENT LAND USE: Vaant
PROPOSED USE CLASSIFICATION: Mafia Subdivision
( Having heard all of the evidence presented at the public Hearing, and based upon the I : .
entire record before it, the Town Council finds that the application is eomp;e* that the
i apphcatm complies with all of the applicable regwremwu of the KmgW& Unified i
Development Ordinance; and that therefore the application to make use of and develop the
property for the purpose and the manner indicated is hereby approved, skied to all
applicable provisions of the Knightdale Unified Development Ordinance and the Njowiog
conditions:
(Page 2 of 7)
I{
i
j?
eK12? l PGO225
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
JERRY GOwER/WAYNE HARPER
PAGE 2
STANDARD CONDITIONS:
1. The applicant dull complete the development strictly In accordance with the plans
submitted to and approved by the Town Co aA a copy of which is filed in the
Planning Department.
2.' Construction Improvement Permit plans, associated documents and certifications
shall be prepared for approval by the Town, consistent with these plans and
conditions approved by the Town Council.
3. If any of the conditions affixed hereto or any part thereof shall be held invalid or . ?!
void, then this permit shall be void and of no effect.
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS:
1. That the applicant receive the density borers allowed in Section 11.71.4 subject to
the following conditions
• That the site include an open space dedication along the length of Marrs Creek
and that the open space dedication be located within a distance of the stream bank
equal to 5 times the width of the strearn at the top of the bank or 50 fed inclusive
of thegranway1wwer wmraft, measured from the centerline of creek,
whichever is greater, in accordance with Section 20.12 of the Unified
Development Ordinance, and that the open space be dedicated to the Town of
Knightdale; and
That the natural drainage ways be utilized and stormwata not be piped, accept
under streets, fivm the strew identified as E to Marks Credo, and that open space
surrounding the drainage way have a minimum width of 50 fat, catered on the
centerline of the drainage way, and that the open spare be dedicated to the°
homeowners association and that the following statement be included on the final
Plat
i .
1
k

The purpose of the open space dedication is to protect healthy vegetation
and carry stormwatec The open space is owned by the homeowners
association. The cleaning for the installation of u u tm or recreadosW i
facilities as generally indicated on the approved putts is permitted.
we

,)f
`i
.. 1
gK'i20lPGO226
i
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
JERRY GOWERIWAYNE HARPER
PAGE 3
12. That full lane widening, curb-an i-gutter, and a sidewalk be constructed along the .
entire length of the property along Old Knight Road as put of the improvements
associated with Phase H or the construction of the second access point, wWch cver;
occurs fire, and that the applicant dedicate S foes of right-of-way along the length
of the property along Old Knight Road, and that the dedication occur as part of
final pit approval for Phase I;
3. That a right turn and deceleration lane be constructed u part of the improveneua
associated with the -coast point proposed in Phase 1,
4. Thu the Town Council authorize tha staff to re-investigate the need for a kB turn
I Ism at the time the developer applies for a driveway permit for the second access
point;
i
That the develops receive 54% credit for the proposed recreation dedication, that
the applicant be required to pry 46% of the required amount for payment in lieu of
dedication, and that the dedication of land occur prior to final plat approval for the
phase in which the area is locoed, and that the open space along Marks Crack,
which will be at least 50 feet wide, measured from the centerline of the Mules
Creek, be dedicated to the Town and that the open space along the throe drainage
ways and the CP&L Easement be dedicated to the homeowners association, and
that the dedication occur in the phue in which'it is locatcd;
6, That a homeowners association be required and that it be in conformance with
Section 14.10.17.4.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance;
71 That in accordance with Section 19. 1.4 and 19.2.5 of the Ud&W Devdopmtart
Ordinance, the applicant attend water and sewer mains to the western property
line in the right-of-way indicated between lots 22 amt 23; and
Rl That the developer dedicate street right-of-way between lots 22 and 23, and that a
fence be erected in the right-of-way, one foot from the western property Lune, and
that the fimot be maintained by the homeowners association until such time the
Town determines that the construction of the street is appropriate„ and that the
final plat include a notation indicated that the fence may be removed and a street
nay be constructed in the dedicated right-of-way.

t ?
,i P
BK12d I PGO221
PERMIT
R/ WAYM HARPER
JNA
r'Y
NESS WHEREOF, the Town of Knightdale has caused this permit to be
n, and the ww"goed being all of the property owners of the property
I, do hereby accept this Spatial Use Permk together with all its conditionk
them and their successors in interest or ownership.
THE TOWN OF IMGHTDALE
SEAL
l
by certify
a this day
and being by me duly sworn says that he knows the corporate seal of the Town of
Knightdale and tbat the seal affixed to the foregoing iruvumo t is the corporate seal of the
Town of Kn4btdate, that Elaine D. Hotmq{L Town Clerk for the Town of Knight"
subsaibed bis name thereto; that the corporate seat of the Town of KnW%dale was affixed
thereto, A by virtue of a resolution of the Town CounciL and that said konscum is the
act and dead of the Town of KnightdahL 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heramto set my hand and notarial seal this the
day of gg h, 19
j%OTAW
Notary
t.-J *$*
My CommissionFxpirm May 2001
k 9 V'ry?E?OUNT
i ``+sq,nnM?
ti
w
(Page 5 of 7)
E
If
r ? -
rt
fl .
;i
?I
8X720.1 PG0228.
U tM proposed action is 4dtnalned to bs a wodificWok the Land Uss Administrator
shau Mquin IM Hlin{ of & new application for approval of the modtfiatiott
An appliation for Moditlalion Of & SW W Use Permit shit be reviewed in accordance
with the prooeduros established to Anide 4.4.
Since an application for hloduiatioo of* Special Use Permit is treated as a new
application, the Tewa. CoamW may impue the same or additional conditions oa as
approved Special Una permit Modidatloa• The appliaw shall tooept all Of the
requirements tad conditions the Coned proposes to impost on the modification.
Acoeplatta of conditonn by tM applicant may be indiattd at the Council bearins for
the Speeisi use permit Modulation or indicated by execution and tecordint o<tM
ModioAd Special Use Permit
i 4.4.17 F.xpim" 6tdandoa u d RavonUOa of Special Use permit
A Special Use Permit or Modibatiat Of Special Use permit sba11 rtta with the lard
covered by the permit or MWifiMdOn- Once comuuaion authorized by a Special Use
permit or Moddicatiom of Special Use permit is Basted, no developumt or
improvtmems other then tint tut wrizod by the permit shalt be eonwicted on that land,
tmku the permit is Hat modiAW u prwr W in Section 4.4.16.
.? 4.4.17.1 FxpiratioaofSpecieusepa"
An approved Special Use Permit shell become auii and void it
A. The coutmaion or activity authorized by Coumeit approval of an
applicatioa hr a Special Use permit or ModWation of Special Use
permit is not stated within twelve (12) mombs of the date of approval,
ofwithia such fustim come stipulated is the approval. Any other
pu-t isstrtd pw AM to the app ma"also become Void. The
L.md UN Administrator shall detumime whether congrxu- Or
aetmty bas galled: or
Within twelve (12) momtbs from the date oo which the Special Use
B permit or Mw ation of a Special use permit was approved. less
titan ten p= M (10%) of tM!Od coat of all WW VCtion excavation.
demolition, attention or similar wort authorized by such permit has
beta completed on the sik; or
is C. At my time coon than twelve (12) momitts after approval of a Special
Use permit or MoMmion of & Special Use permit tad after the 9
of ooogstrctio4 wait in k aheramu of the permit Is &COMIGHOd fix A
period ortwelve (12) moothK at
D. A written request for ex cudom of the time limit has not ban VaRW
by the Town Couocill within td" (12) months from the date On
which the Special Use Permit was approved.
For purposes of this section. at date on wbich a Special Use Permit or MadiHC W= ors
Special use Permit is issued by the TWO Council is the date IM CO-odI votes to
approve do same. Tuem spent is Iitiptint a matter directly related to the issuatsce d .
said permit shall not be counted in doersoWDS any time period set out above.
p
4-11
t
i '
l
f
S
f?
1
(Page 6 of 7)
4
N
II
I,
- a??201eco229
I
t
4.4.17.2

I to
lta C'm i otO.W q is act laced tor. dw pwild wlthlr give (S) yew of the
I,,,= of tM spww use Permit. IM Pormit than expIM (Anxnded 9114195)
Extwtioa of Special Use Pump
The Tower Couwil SW extend for a pu10d of up to ooe yeu d w date when AA approved
Special UN Petttdt ttwtald ObUVAN expire If it concludes WL
A. The Special UN pemik hat act Yet 4VIF4 W4
B. TM dt veWW has protx,WW with due dilisu" sad In Rood faith; sad
C Cord uw hate rot cbupd 10 subaartiailp as to waterers a um
apOWAOa for spOcw use Pamir app"
Requests far eaaensiona still ba mddoW by die TWO Cwm_l without msM to the
special UN Permit row"m Sueauire extensions msy be Vwwd fo; PanWSof up
to ore year =bjat a the tame fic&W ad out above.
U "W" rapontibltitY of" develops or ltls West to detennino the dace of a
Tows Courdl atWi,, prior to tM expiration daa and to submit a wnu ,"?
etdeador ottM spedd uN psmat a minimum of WM-4va (35) dxri
mxrinR.
Revoatioa of Special UN permit
A ifsoy waditioos of & specW UN Pemt oc ldodificatioa of speeid
Use Permit. Iaduding completion tame limits. or requirematts of this
chsyts appliabk to tM puma or Modifiatios Ara VW&tek the
Council may revolts tM Permit oMod a TM p pem ow.
of record shall be given A thirty (3 ) day utimby the data d aUof
tM CowwWs im" to consida the rovcmdon and offt
Council MM" for Aafoa
TM Council may rointmq a rued SW W Use Pamir or
Modificstioa of Spend Use Pemit it it daenaines tbW A) the holder
8
of the revoked permit m ModMO" submitted a request for
minstawmat to tM Lund Use Administrator within ninety (90) days
of the sevoatioo; and B) tM violations that wee the Huse of the
avocation have b= co=t d; sad C) ilas developarmt fully complies
with all cord?fioas of tM Pcrmit or Modulation and AU Wilcabie
eequirawAlS of this chapter.
C Oa roqueat by 1M holder of a Spc"UN Permit or Modifi'W' of
the Council may rwoM the Peru of
E
5p UN Permit.
that A) tM eorucuetioa authorized by t .
Modifiatioa it it detesmiaes
tM Permit or MwUacmioa bas beer started sad the completion time j
limit hat act yet ezpiad; and B) the request is made in cAuogioa
I With an appucluoa for approval of a dmlopmeac other than slier `
t wthorized by tM Permit or Moditiation: and C) the propratted
developmwt N appscvcd by Cotatxil iroorpores a in'U dedBr
coasideatlon of the sites already disturbed .
previous commumcals Made under the Specal use MOM

(Page 7 of 7)
?? Z f

! NORTH CAROLINA ;
WAKE COUNTY. \4
NORTH CARCIM-WAKEU
m.a?.sorro.iar-a-
i
srwpr) "lhAkb
(.?ta•aweaan.a. n+.Yrn.n«?uNhrario?r.dyrsl+•+?¦?•or?.rr.. '
WhMY?e1t?MM?nmbit p?y?hrwL -
i K91E ! HgMrSion"
t
mr aaa.Mraprrdos.
SK7201 PGO230
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
JERRY GOWERIWAYNE HARPER
I PAGE S
A CV Q 1 U v P.r ownetox do hereby
aokno edge receipt of this Special Use Permit. The undersigned owner(s) do further '
acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to this permit except in accordance with
i all of its conditions and requirements that the restriction shall be biading upon them sad ! .
' their is interest l
As I
I Owner a?` J NqO {
? a Af?Jl7e? ?4 j,.
NORTH CAROLINA s a I.{b ?•? d a?
WAKE COUNTY : ?, dl c c
J v I/?(QSS arIoury Pubti in of or
County and State' do hereby certify that etr d' '
owners. p«=nally apPMW before me this day mad acknowledged the due atecution
the foregoing instrumeat.
%VrrMS ary hand and notarial seal "the 97 day of b'e? 19'7 .
j Notary Public
25. L99
My Commission Expires: - t ioa ? p"m

STAFF REPORT
Town of Knightdale
May r and Town Council
I
From: Chri Scott, Planner H
Subject: SU-7-04 Emerald Point Phase III
Modification
Date: May 19, 2004
Budget Amendment #BA
Finance Director Signature
Town Manager Signature -
Ju-L-v,*, zmeraia romt ruase 111 Modification
May 19, 2004 Town Council Meeting
Page 1
TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 • Knightdale, NC 27545
Office [phone] 0 Fax [phone]
"ETITION FOR: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - SU-2-04
Emerald Point Phase III Modification
REPORT TO THE TOWN COUNCIL
HEARING DATE: May 19, 2004
(LURB DATE: May 10, 2004)
(INITIAL HEARING DATE: May 3, 2004)
I
Prepared by the Knightdale Planning Department
1. REQUEST
This request is to approve a modification to an approved
Emerald Point Subdivision due to substantial changes in
Council as required by 4.4.16.6. Emerald Point, Phases I,
was approved by the Town Council on June 19, 1996.
II. PROJECT PROFILE
Special Use Permit for the design of Phase III
the vehicular circulation approved by the Town
II and III (SU-1-96, formerly identified as S0196)
PROPERTY LOCATION:
WAKE COUNTY PIN:
t
ZONING DISTRICT:
I
CROSS REFERENCE FILES:
APPLICANT:
1
PROPERTY OWNER:
PROPERTY SIZE:
i
CURRENT LAND USE:
PROPOSED LAND USE:
Emerald Point Subdivision, east of Old Knight Road
1755.04 92 5535
R7-CU, Single Family Residential - Conditional Use District
ZMA-8-95, SU-1-96, S-6-01
Jerry Gower Construction
7324 Siemens Road
Knightdale, NC 27591
Jerry Gower Construction
7324 Siemens Road
Knightdale, NC 27591
29.38-acres
Undeveloped
Land Use #1.11 Site Built Homes (94 lots), Open Space, and
Public Streets
SU-2-04, Emerald Point Phase III Modification
May 19, 2004 Town Counci Meeting
Page 2
i
III. LOCATION AND HISTORY
This subdivision is ?ocated north of US Highway 64, East and east of Old Knight Road (see map on page 4).
The property was rezoned to R-7 CUD on February 21, 1996 (ZMA-8-95) with the following condition:
I
This district shall have a minimum lot size of for single-family residential lots of 8,500 square feet. All
other dimensional criteria will comply with the requirements of the R7 zoning district.
In June of 1996, the entire 382-lot subdivision (Phases I, II and III) was approved as a special use permit (SU-
1-96). The additional conditions of approval are outlined below:
1. That the ap? Jicant receive the density bonus allowed in Section 11.7.2.4 subject to the following
conditions f
a. That the site include open space dedication along the length of. Marks Creek and that the open
space dedication be located within a distance of the stream bank equal to 5 times the width of
the stream at the top of the bank or 50 feet inclusive of the greenway/sewer easement,
measured from the centerline of the creek, whichever is greater, in accordance with Section
20.12?jof the UDO, and that the open space be dedicated to the Town of Knightdale, and
b. That the natural drainage ways be utilized and stormwater not be piped, except under streets,
from tpe street identified as E (Zircon Lane) to Marks Creek, and that open space surrounding
the drainage way have a minimum width of 50 feet, centered on the centerline of the drainage
way, and that the open space be dedicated to the homeowners association, and that the
following statement be included on the final plat:
"The purpose of the open space dedication is to protect healthy vegetation and carry
stormwater. The open space is owned by the homeowners association. The clearing for the
installation of utilities or recreational facilities as generally indicated on the approved plans is
permi ded."
2. That a full lane widening, curb-and-gutter, and a sidewalk be constructed along the entire length of the
property along Old Knight Road as part of the improvements associated with Phase 11 or the
construction of the second access point, whichever occurs first, and that the applicant dedicate 5 feet of
right-of-way along the length of the property along Old Knight Road, and that the dedication occur as
part of final plat approval for Phase l;
3. That a right turn and deceleration lane be constructed as part of the improvements associated with the
access point proposed in Phase 1;
4. That the Town Council authorize the staff to re-investigate. the need for a left turn lane at the time the
developer apples for a driveway permit for the second access point;
5. That the developer receive 54% credit for the proposed recreation dedication, that the applicant be
required to pay 46% of the required amount for payment in lieu of dedication, and that the dedication of
land occur prior to final plat approval for the phase in which the area is located, and that the open
space along Marks Creek, which will be at least 50 feet wide, measured from the centerline of the
Marks Creek, be dedicated to the Town and that the open space along the three drainage ways and the
CP&L Easement be dedicated to the homeowner's association, and that the dedication occur in the
phase in which 'It is located;
6. That a homeowners association be required and that it be in conformance, with Section 14.10.17.4.6 of
the UDO; I
Z That the developer dedicate street right-of-way between lots 122 and 23, and that a fence be erected in
the right-of-way, one foot from the western property line, and that the fence be maintained by the
homeowners association until such time the Town determines that the construction of the street is
appropriate, and that the final plat include a notation indicated that the fence may be removed and a
street may be constructed in the final dedicated right-of-way.
SU-2-04, Emerald Point Phase III Modification
May 19, 2004 Town Council Meeting
Page 3
.
Phases I and II have been constructed and recorded in accordance with the approved plans. The applicant
was proposing to begin construction on Section III, as approved, however, the US Army Corps of Engineers
will only approve 2 of the 6 proposed stream crossings in this Section. This is due to more stringent
regulations on filling wetlands (see environmental map below).
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a modification to the approved special use permit in order to redesign the
layout of Emerald Pgint Phase III. The new layout contains the same number of buildable lots, 94, however,
does not have the street interconnectivity that was approved as part of the original Special Use permit.
U"
f
PIUISE 111

I -1 ?__ T./ .A V_ ? a a /1 V \ I '='1 \d
2`
PXWOS LN
NANDINA LN 1 5 / L - l
MOimO LN
LILY TURF LN
EXISTING SITE
IV. ZONING
A. ZONING DISTRICT
This site is located within the R7-CU (Single-Family Residential - Conditional Use) zoning district. The only
zoning condition is that the minimum lot size for single-family dwellings be 8,500 sq. ft., however, the Town
Council approved the density bonus as outlined in Section 11.7.2.4 of the UDO as a condition of the Special
Use Permit, which allows lots to be designed at the minimum criteria for R7 zoning district (7,000 square feet
with 50 feet lot width).
SU-2-04, Emerald Point ?hase III Modification
May 19, 2004 Town Council Meeting
Page 4
EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES
B. LOT LAYOUT/SETBACKS/HEIGHT/IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
The standards are listed in the table below:
I
REQUIREMENT REQUIRED
Minimum Lot Size 7,000 s q. ft.
Minimum !Lot Width 50 ft.
Min. Street Setback 30 ft.
Min. Side!Setback 8 ft.
Min. Corner Side Setback 20 ft.
Min. Rear, Setback 20 ft.
Maximurni Building Height 35 ft.
MaximumlImpervious Surface Maximum of 40%
V. SUBDIVISION S I ANDARDS
A. VEHICULAR ICIRCULATION/STREET IMPROVEMENTS/PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
The proposed revisions have significantly changed the vehicular circulation for Section III. Previously all
streets had interconnections to other streets within the subdivision. Due to the Corps of Engineers
requirements, this interconnectivity has been impacted. The new layout creates an area in which 37 lots are
accessible by one section of Morganite Court.

SU-2-04, Emerald Point Phase III Modification
May 19, 2004 Town Council Meeting
Page 5

ORIGINAL STREET LAYOUT
PROPOSED STREET LAYOUT
I
I
B. PUBLIC UTILITIES
Town water and sewer services are available to this project and have been altered minimally to follow the new
street right-of-ways in some sections. Revised plans will need to be `reviewed and approved during
construction plan review and must be permitted by NCDENR.
C. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Stormwater is to follow the natural drainage ways and to be piped under any road crossings. Any revisions will
need to be reviewed and approved during construction plan review and mush be permitted by NCDENR and
Wake County.
VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
L
A. LAND USE DESIGN PLAN
The purposelof the Land Use Design Plan is to manage the content and design of development in order
to promote the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
This area haI been identified as a Neighborhood District.
B. THOROUGHFARE PLAN/COLLECTOR STREET PLAN
Section III is located in Emerald Point, and does not front on any road identified in the Town's
Functional Classification Plan. All thoroughfare plan improvements associated with Emerald Point have
been constructed during previous phases.
I
VIII. LURB MEETING
The Land Use Review Board met on May 10, 2004 to discuss this item. Board Member Stephen Morgan
asked questions of the applicant on whether it is possible to bridge the wetlands without disturbing them.
Planning Staff advised the board that the Corp of Engineers would permit bridging wetlands, however, the cost
associated with bridging would be detrimental to the project and would possibly result in the loss of several
lots. Mr. Morgan also'asked about replacing some of the crossings, however, doing so would result in cul-de-
sacs that do not Meet'Ithe Town requirements of not exceeding 500 feet in length.
The LURB voted unanimously to recommend approval of SU-2-04 subject to the Planning Staff
recommendations.
IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends approval of SU-2-04, Emerald Point Phase III Modification to the
approved Special Use Permit (SU-1-96), with the following conditions:
1. That revised construction plans be reviewed and approved by the Town for the revised public
improvements, I including lot layout, street details, street profiles, storm, drainage, sewer layout and
details, and water line layout and details;
2. That any previously recorded lot that must be changed due to the modifications submit a recombination
plat showing the proposed changes, and be recorded in the Wake County Register of Deeds.
SU-2-04, Emerald Point Phase III Modification
May 19, 2004 Town Council Meeting
Page 6
4.4.16.1 A significant change in the boundaries of the site approved by the Council shall
constitute a modification;
4.4.16.2 A change from the use approved by the Council shall constitute a modification;
4.4.16.3 An increase of ten (10) percent or more in the floor area or number of parking spaces
approved by the Council shall constitute a modification (Amended 8/14/95);
4.4.16.4 Substantial changes in the location of principal and/or accessory buildings approved by
the Council shall constitute a modification;
4.4.16.5 Structural alterations significantly affecting the basic size, form, style, and architectural
.detail of principal and/or accessory buildings as shown on the plans approved by the
Council shall constitute a modification;
4.4.16.6 Substantial changes in the location of pedestrian or vehicular access or circulation
approved by the Council shall constitute a modification; and
4.4.16.7 Substantial change in the amount of area or location of landscape screens approved by
the Council shall constitute a modification.
If the proposed action is determined to be a modification, the Land Use Administrator
shall require the filing of a new application for approval of the modification.
An application for Modification of a Special Use Permit shall be reviewed in accordance
with the procedures established in Article 4.4.
Since an application for Modification of a Special Use Permit is treated as a new
application, the Town Council may impose the same or additional conditions on an
approved Special Use Permit Modification. The applicant shall accept all of the
requirements and conditions the Council proposes to impose on the modification.
Acceptance of conditions by the applicant may be indicated at the Council hearing for the
Special Use Permit Modification or indicated by execution and recording of the Modified
Special Use Permit.
4.4.17 Expiration, Extension and Revocation of Special Use Permit
A Special Use Permit or Modification of Special Use Permit shall run with the land
covered by the Permit or Modification. Once construction authorized by a Special Use
Permit or Modification of Special Use Permit is started, no development or
improvements other than that authorized by the Permit shall be constructed on that land
unless the Permit is first modified as provided in Section 4.4.16.
4.4.17.1 Expiration of Special Use Permit
An approved Special Use Permit shall become null and void if:
A. The construction or activity authorized by Council approval of an
application for a Special Use Permit or Modification of Special Use
Permit is not started within twelve (12) months of the date of approval,
or within such further time stipulated in the approval. Any other
permit issued pursuant to the approval shall also become void. The
4-10
Land Use Administrator shall determine whether construction or
activity has started; or
B. Within twelve (12) months from the date on which the Special Use
Permit or Modification of a Special Use Permit was approved, less than
ten percent (10%) of the total cost of all construction excavation,
demolition, alteration. or similar work authorized by such permit has
been completed on the site; or
C. At any time more than twelve (12) months after approval of a Special
Use Permit or Modification of a Special Use Permit and after the start
of construction, work in furtherance of the permit is discontinued for a
period of twelve (12) months; or
D. A written request for extension of the time limit has not been granted
by the Town Council within twelve (12) months from the date on
which the Special Use Permit was approved.
For purposes of this section, the date on which a Special Use Permit or Modification of a
Special Use Permit is issued by the Town Council is the date the Council votes to
approve the same. Time spent in litigating a matter directly related to the issuance of
said permit shall not be counted in determining any time period set out above.
If a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued for the project within five (5) years of the
issuance of the Special Use Permit, the Permit shall expire. (Amended 8/14/95)
4.4.17.2 ; Extension of Special Use Permit
The Town Council may extend for a period of up to one year the date when an approved
Special Use Permit would otherwise expire if it concludes that:
A. The Special Use Permit has not yet expired; and
B. The developer has proceeded with due diligence and in good faith; and
C. Conditions have not changed so substantially as to warrant a new
application for Special Use Permit approval.
Requests for extensions shall be considered by the Town Council without resort to the
Special Use Permit procedure. Successive extensions may be granted for periods of up
to one year subject to the same findings set out above.
It shall be the responsibility of the developer or his agent to determine the date of a Town
Council meeting prior to the expiration date and to submit a written request for extension
of the special use permit a minimum of thirty-five (35) days in advance of that meeting.
4.4.17.3 Revocation of Special Use Permit
A. If any conditions of a Special Use Permit or Modification of Special
! Use Permit, including completion time limits, or requirements of this
chapter applicable to the Permit or Modification are violated, the
Council may revoke the Permit or Modification. The property owner
of record shall be given a thirty (30) day notice by registered mail, of
4-11

4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
the Council's intent to consider the revocation and the date of the
Council meeting for action.
B. The Council may reinstate a revoked Special Use Permit or
Modification of Special Use Permit if it determines that: A) the holder
of the revoked Permit or Modification submitted a request for
reinstatement to the Land Use Administrator within ninety (90) days of
the revocation; and B) the violations that were the cause of the
revocation have been corrected; and C) the development fully complies
with all conditions of the Permit or Modification and all applicable
requirements of this chapter.
C. On request by the holder of a Special Use Permit or Modification of
Special Use Permit, the Council may revoke the Permit or Modification
if it determines that: A) the construction authorized by the Permit or
Modification has been started and the completion time limit has not yet
expired; and B) the request is made in conjunction with an application
for approval of a development other than that authorized by the Permit
or Modification; and C) the proposed development as approved by
Council incorporates adequate consideration of the site's already
disturbed land area in its design and previous commitments made under
the Special Use process.
SIGN PERMITS
Sign Permit Applications shall be submitted for all signs identified in Article 21, except
for those specifically exempted. Such signs may be erected, altered, constructed, moved,
converted or enlarged only after the issuance of a Sign Permit.
MASTER SIGN PERMITS
Master Sign Permit Applications shall be submitted for Unified Developments, and
Major Commercial and Residential Subdivisions and approved by the Town Council.
Signs included in a Master Sign Plan may be erected, altered, constructed, moved,
converted or enlarged only after the issuance of a Master Sign Permit.
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
Applications for Floodplain Development Permits shall be submitted for any proposed
development within a flood hazard area and shall include information required in Article
20. These permits shall be reviewed and considered for approval by the Land Use
Administrator. Nonresidential development proposed within the flood fringe area shall
require a Special Use Permit reviewed and considered for approval by the Town Council.
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS PERMIT
A zoning lot or lots shall not be substantially changed; clearing, or excavation shall not
be commenced; and no building, or part thereof, shall be constructed, erected, extended,
enlarged, moved, or structurally altered except in accordance with a Construction
Improvements Permit. In consideration of an application or request for this permit, the
Land Use Administrator shall require any plans or certifications as may be required to
ensure that the development, as proposed, shall comply with the requirements and
standards of this chapter, or Knightdale Standard Specifications and Construction
4-12
i
rvtai . t?4
l Z +*Doa saw Q
d1k
?Q_-- -
2- V-
q
5_ cos ??
733 -S05-3_>? -557
_ r
I
i
i?

It --

i

t

?{ F
,4 j
6x/iov

1

B!a/oy

i

k
?a3
?s
}i
3/iv1d?
-- _ v'r -.`//--
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: -Mr. John Dorney VVETLAN?S l 901 ?R{? j/p
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkvie?v Boulevard JUL 13 2004
Raleigh NC 27604 WATER
QUAL1Tys?,.?.
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr., Dorney:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as listed in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
area, and wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
After speaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarification of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 3,20 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice a year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
general dimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed impact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads have been installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhilfip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone, [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NC EEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached-
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NGEEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney General['s] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the Wetlands/401 Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer [exempt] from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following: 1). the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
- -- riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittal.
Please call or email me at [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any
further xplanation.
Sincerely, 'J
?an Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map
? l
?p?v QG
CO r
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Construction
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NCI
27591
i
Dear Sirs:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
May 27, 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request &
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
JUN - 1. 2004
on Hold Notification
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office ofthe Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department we believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wedand/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
1
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impa ! ed, but are proposed to be restored.
E
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project compliance.
North Carolina Division of Water. Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/nowetiands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerr-y Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Water Quality Certification Program
ds
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
NCDENR
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Gi
May 26, 2004
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary,
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road JUN _
Raleigh, NC 27614 j
i
Subject: Project: Emerald Pointe
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps-,of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit1401 Certific Ilion within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy, the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Ri ari an (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max ( 434 0.6506
The stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be,performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely, n
Deborah D. Anderson,
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] l Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/
NorthCarolina
Naturally
VU/LO/GVV4 1kI. 1J rAA eLV 000 V104 VV"ZA k1una1 Lsk, '.
I
LVJ U L
TOWN OF KfUGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 0 Knightdale; NC 27545
Office (919) 217-22,111 0 Fax [phone]
I
June 23, 2004
Mr_ Steve Mitchell
DWQ - RRO
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
1
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III
-
Zoning Vested Rights
NBRRO 99-040
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on June 19, 1996 the Town of Knight,] ale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Pointy, Subdivision. Phases I
& II have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate limits, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase 1H of this approv;4 subdivision includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 acres of land. With this project approval fhe Town Council has
granted Mr. Jerry Gower and the Emerald Point: Subdivision zoning vested rights .- complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Pha;e III, Mr. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special us, permit to aeeommodase
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on M,.c i 3.2004 the Knightdate
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, permitting the redesign of the roadway network and lot layout at the _
expense of street connectivity and potential public safety access issues.^
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Frangos, A1CP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knightdale
c rnu tl?*C?n_ Tll?
QQhN
7324 Siemans Road
Wendell, NC 27591
t
MAY.06'2004 13108 919 876 5823 USACE RAL REG
U.S. Array Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory ,Field Office
6508 Fa11s of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
FAX COVER SHEET
#2483 P.001/005
Date: s y.
Message to:
From: G.,_9
Total number of pages including cover page:
i If all pages am not received, please call 876-8441.
Remarks:
I

MAY.0612004 1308 919 876 5823 USACE RAL REG #2483 P.002/005
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200321218.200420901 County:_ Wake
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
Acm• im bower - Attn: Mr. Sean Clark _
Address 7324 Siemans Road Address 11010 aver Rid, a Road
Wendell North Carolina 27591 lei lino 22614
Telephone Number 919-365-9767 Telephone Number 919-846-5900
I, „
Size and Location of Property (waterbodv, Highway name/number, town etc.). The 114.15 acre site is
located east of Old Knight Road (SR 2232), approximately 13 miles north of the intersection of Old Knight Road
and US Highway 64. northeast of Knightdale, Wake County, North Carolina.
PescriDtion of . ctivity: This permit authorizes mechanized landclearing, excavation, the placement of fill,
and the installation of culverts associated with Emerald Pointe subdivision. Temporary impacts to waters
of the U.S. authorized under AID # 200321218 include.2537 acre of wetland and 105 linear feet of an
unnamed tributary to Marks Creek in the Neuse River Basin. Permanent impacts to waters of the U.S.
authorized under AH) # 200420901 for 2 road crossings include .3253 acre of wetland and 217 linear feet
of stream channel in the Neuse River Basin. See Special Conditions for mitigation requirements.
Applicable Law: _ Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Authorization: I Regional General Permit Number
12.39 Nationwide Permit Number(s)
Any violation oP the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may subject
the permittee to 'n stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This Department
of the Army Regional General Permit or Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve the permittee of
the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee
way need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work. If you have any questions
regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrea Wade
at telephone nu `berms}9.876-8441 a31.
This verificationn7wi0 be valid for two years from the date of this letter unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, reissued or revoked. Also, this verification will remain valid for the two years if, during that
period, the natioi ide permit authorization is reissued without modification or the activity complies with
any subsequent modification of the nationwide permit authorization. If during the two years, the
nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such that the activity
would no longer; comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities whicb have
coaunenced (i.e-, are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the
nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the
date of the nationwide permiVs expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on i case-by-case basis tom end or revoke th authorization.
Regulatory Project Mena er ignitors
Authorization Date Expiration D5' atp
SURVEY PLATS,' F'IEL S. TCH, WETLAND DELINEATION ET ., UST BE ATTACHED
TO THE FILE COPY .OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF: Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center, and Raleigh, NC 27699-1619

i"
MAY.0612004 13 08 919 876 5823 USACE RAL REG #2483 P.003/005
Action ID: 200321218, 200420901 County: Wake
SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITION
Restoration of wetlands and stream channels impacted by unauthorized activities:
1. Remote all fill from unauthorized activities in jurisdictional wetlands and replant with natural
vegetation. Remove riprap by hand from wetland designated as Impact 16 on plans dated April
13, 2004.
2. Restore stream channels to ori ginal pattern, dimension, and profile. Replant 50 ft buffers on either
side of restored stream channels. Tree species should include Sycamore, Willow Oak, Water
Oak, Tulip Poplar, Green Ash and/or other species characteristic of the area.
3. Submitu a restoration plan to the COE for approval prior to commencing activity in waters of the
U.S. au?horiaed by this permit.
Recommended by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission:
1. Permittee shall install in-stream silt curtain weighted at the bottom, and stringent bank erosion
control. j If tree removal is required, stumps and roots should remain intact for bank stabilization.
2. Permittee shall initiate in-stream construction activities only during low flow conditions that allow
for the effective deployment of the silt curtain.
3. Pecmittee shall install silt fences and temporary check dams at all wetland and stream crossings to
be removed following completion of the activity and proper stabilization of disturbed soils within
the work`area.
4. Permitter shall seed wetland areas with wetland seed mixture only. Species sclecdon shall be
subject t ' Corps approval.
Requiring on-site demarcation of wetland boundary:
Fenced boundaries
Perrnittee shall locate all wetland boundaries and identify them on site with the installation of temporary
fencing (e.g., orange webbed tree-protection fencing). Markings on the boundary fencing (or attached
flags) shall identify the demarcated area as a wetland. Demarcation of wetland areas shall be
accomplished prior to initiation of any impacts to jurisdictional area (fill, mechanized landcloaring,
culvert installation, etc.) authorized by this permit. The fencing shall remain in place throughout the
duration of all construction activities associated with the project. The Corps of Engineers regulatory
project manager shall be contacted at least two weeks prior to removal of wetland boundary fencing.
Requiring payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program:
You shall mitigate for .3253 acres of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and 217 linear feet of stream
channel associated with this project by payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) in the mount necessary to perform restoration to .6506 acres of jurisdictional riparian
hardwood forest wetlands and 434 linear feet of warm water stream in the upper Neuse River Basin
MAY.06'2004 13,09 919 876 5823 USACE RAL REG #2483 P.0041005
(Cataloging Unit 03020201). Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only
after the permittee has made full payment with certified check to the NCEEP, and the NCEEP has made
written confirmation to the District Engineer, that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work
required, pursuant to Paragraph IV.D, of the Memorandum of Understanding between the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S..Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District. date November4,1998.
Requiring recording of wetland map for a subdivision:
i
Permittee shall cause to be recorded in the register of Deeds for Wake County a plat, showing the
subdivision plan for the property, and a survey of the boundary of the jurisdictional waters of the United
States, as approved by the Corps of Engineers, within 180 days of issuance of this permit, and prior to the
sale of any property within Phase III of the subdivision.
Regional Conditions
For all NWPs that involve construction of culverts, measures will be included in the construction that will
promote the safe passage of fish and other aquatic organisms. For all culvert construction activities, the
dimension, pattern, and profile of the stream, (above and below a pipe or culvert), should not be modified
by widening the stream channel or by reducing the depth of the stream. Culvert inverts will be buried at
least one foot below the bed of the stream for culverts greater than 48 inches in diameter. For culverts 48
inches in diameter or smaller, culverts mint be buried below the bed of the stream to a depth equal to or
greater than 20 percent of the diameter of the culvert.
Utility Line Installations
The areas of waters of the United States that are disturbed will be limited to the minimum necessary to
install the utility line. The construction corridor authotizcd by this permit will not exceed forty (40) feet
in width in the wetland areas.
Upon completion of the work, only a twenty (20) foot wide maintenance corridor or less is allowed by
this permit within the wetland areas.
Permittee shall seed wetland areas with wetland seed mixture only. Fescue grass will not be utilized
in the wetland areas.
1
MAY.06'2004 13
:09 919 876 5823 USAGE RAL REG
Wetland Impacts Permanent Temporary
1 0.0127
2 0.0411
3 0.0312
4 0.0053
5 0.0404
6 0.0274
7 0.018
8 0.0017
9 0.0076
10 ' 0.0142
11 0.1852
12 0.0395
13 0.0288
14 0.012
15 0.0068
16 i 0.0487
17 0.0243
18 0.0151
19 0.019
TOTALi 0.3253 0.2537
Mitigation 0.3253 0 Ratio: 2:1
Stream Impacts
4 40
5 149 M
6 32
7 33
15 22 N
20 68 'M
TOTAL 239 105
Mitigation 217 0 Ratio: 2:1
#2483 P.005/005
R ?

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: M>}. John Dorney JUL 13 2004
2321 Crabtree Blvd. WATER
Parkview Boulevard QUAd ,i:
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
1
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter, is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy attached), which
requested. additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as fisted in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
area, and zuetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the'restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
After speaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarification of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 320 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20,% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice a year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
generaldimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed ?npact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads havbeen installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
Charlotte Office: ' Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone.[phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NC-EEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney General[s] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the Wetlandsf401 Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer [exempt] from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following: l). the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
- - riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittaL
Please'call or email me at [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincer gly,
an Cfark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map
l7
Michael F. Easley
Q Governor
G'
3r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
r-i Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`C Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 27, 2004
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
I
Grover Construction JUN - 1. 2004
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
i'
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetiands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office ofthe Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department we believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurted on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, ri parian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, apd show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plains and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility oir continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project compliance.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mal Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwebands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Water Quality Certification Program
ds U
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
'Raleigh, NC 27614
NCDENR
No h Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Michael F. Easley, Go` ernor
E
May 26, 2004
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge oad
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Project: Emerald Pointe
Countv: Wake
Resources
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
i "I JUN - . L?.-T
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will acce t for this ro'ect is also indicated in this table
I Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max 434 0.6506
The stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone]
l
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade,!USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell; DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
Sincerely,
1o ' n
I?
Deborah D. Anderson,
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
NC DENR Ecosystem; Enhancement Program One
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619 NOfthCarOllna
Phone: [phone] , FAX: [phone] \ Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.usiwrp/ Naturally
uvi coi cuu4 iI. tl) rtsn a1a
.r I
June 23, 2004
Ooa a?a4 uv"rln l,unai in%, ?JuG
TOWN OF x.IffGATDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 4, Knightdale, NC 27545
Ofhoe (919) 217-22,14! 0 Fax [phone]
Mr. Steve Mitchell
DWQ - O
NCDENRR1
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, k 27699-1628
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III -
Zoning Vested Rights
NBRRO 99-040
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on June 19, 1996 the Town of Knightdale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Point: Subdivision. Phases I
& H have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate limits, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase IA of this approv;ai subdivision includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 acres of land. With this project approval I'he Town Council has
granted MrJerry Gower and the Emerald Point Subdivision zoning vested rights : complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Phut;e III, W. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special usi°: permit to aeeommodaie
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on M,.ri 3.2004 the Knightdak
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, permitting the redesign of the roadway network and lot layout at the _
expense of sitreet connectivity and potential public safety access issues.
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Frangos, AICP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knlghtdale
?^• iw,-.-,rf :? rn?.(?r?cfil_,r_'ll[1T±?A-rtL?
7324 Siemans Road
Wendell, NC 27591
GRAPHIC SCALE I=mp
1 11 _ 50' _'
o
CT 2
PORAR Y
DOSED)
ANDS.
SQ. FT.
N =
I 50 0 50 100 U -? OCH ?s6 SS
Co 1
C
eC o ? - 01 59'
00
= r`
I I _? ? f
- CA?P
?M Q0
I o ??
73 2 254 \
Ln U 174CH2/
Co M
175
76
00 76
'?
11i
253
IIII ? / ? /
?,? i I I r NNE ?
V, 4 93B 190 I II I If II I 1 A
8 IMPACT 3
28 19/1 B A
O 9932 SF
I- I_A RI_ D
L-14
S? 9q9 WETLANDS: /
1359 SQ. FT. /
50 /
27
190 /
189 \ \ / / \
\ \ / / 274 \ V
\ CATEGORIES
A-EXISTING (i.e., no outside restoration)
®B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
i ?
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
276 \
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration) fy?
? ! ! ? F-RIP-RAPPED;AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted) \
-_ 7
Z_ 1(
? \ I 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 50' i
65CH44\
7 1.
66 4 /
7 I M PACT 7
69CH C-TEMPORARY
7('HTRAP OIDAL ROPOSED
7Ll-CHANNEL » ITH )
7-ARA ? WETLANDS:
R4
3.1 TT76 1???78SQ. FT.
CH4
_7 5 80C4CHANNEL:
00 790 2 + 84CH4
1
78CH3 T_LLI'I` FT.
9
F. .S.,- 12 87CH4+ + a8C q
9.40 o IMPACT 6
SEMEN B-CLEARED 6
9'r
WETLANDS:
50 0 50 100
\ 81 \
IMPACT 8 \ \
B-CLEARED \ 1
WETLANDS: \
76 SQ. FT.
?+ C l?-3
?C, 1 23 /
O? y 122 + r?C, 1 ftT
-1 y ,a +l
00 _ 0 120T C ` +
^'oocy A X20'._ SANITAR
71
4
1193 SQ. -FT. 8 SS
80
CHANNEL:
32 LFT. .B-# 5 - /
V IN/Z295.51
INV UT=29 \
267 /
PRIVATE D? IMAGE/ EASE T 79 \ \ \
\ \ \ \ I
\ N \ CATEGORIES
?J
\ A-EXISTING (i.e., no outside restoration) \
B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration) C
F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted) \
i
t l \- -- I I I I I t * 7? 4A
GRAPHIC SCALE I I 40 A
1 50' 415ATTCH
I 40 A
50 0 50 100 I ` I MpA
L -? -?W C-TE
i QW 4
F 76 4?1P ?< (EXIS
0
I
I I I W 9,703 SF WET
31 g J I I I 40 A'..-
L- - 99A L 8066
3 8F 1ZA
18A 416ATTCH
41 A (OLD TRAP #
IMPACT 12 75 420ATTRAP #23
B "CLEARED I 396A 5 ?,
I C\
372A WI i ETLAN DS : 179 A
1719 SQ. FT. 4
376A 389A L-41 ` 392E
377A 7 _-a CLASS „1 ,
8A?\ 0- SlKtA 90A L=26',
FER W=30
F- 5B
R PRIVA 3 87B
20' DR AG?El EASEM
(TYP)E 2> _ 388
10,560 T=2 8 RA D P01WE7 /D <
IN. 4-5-5 ? P H E
CATEGORIES
A-EXISTING i.e., no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED ?((to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
_ I
1 7,3
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 4,01 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
F-RIP-RAPPED AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted) ? /
316 I dT1323
IMPA4 r1MPACT 13 324 \
i
D-TEMPORARY B-CLEARED \
(PRQPOSED) WETLANDS: \
WETLANDS: 1255 SQ. FT. ?--
871 SQ. FT.
a
' ro r ?? ?P h? 5`' 1G © 590 S
2"' 1<
4 6: P@1.00% P ?P cH
3STARTCH
X43 i ?? LP Q S SSS 356CL(Xff
?. 057CLCH4 S ro ?P h
ITA
B 3 v0, --- - S 51 h1G? ?0 rO a ??
9 - N 61 E
' 314 / / 1 r co :1,
92 \ \ ! 1 ; +30?
P36 \ TRA? #20 J.
-C.B. 24/ 331
P P = 07 -?
3
/
\ 9,607 S.
GRAPHIC SCALE / \ \
1 " = 50' 329 \
50 0 50 100 8,272 S. F.
CATEGORIES
i A-EXISTING (i.?., no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED (t0 be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance) 1328
17,077 S.F.
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED 4PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
=1 F-RIP-RAPPED [REA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)
327
282 I 8,728 S. F. I 111111
F - - -?
ST?4, 24+65.33
24
24+42- 1
95' LT
4S/D
a i;
puASF 2
z 158
J
S
I -9,108
Lf)
Q a
91
W W
Q I m 21-19 SF
,`- ??
Z-0,7 x-18 M
? _, D -,
' IMPACT 16 y
F-RIP-RAPPED
-
1 AREA 157
ROCKS TO BE - J
REMOVED BY -
I ?
HAND:
2120 SQ. FT. 156

GRAPHIC SCALE
"
'
1
= 50
500 50 100 I a

CATEGORIES
A-EXISTING (ile., no outside restoration)
® B-CLEARED (to be replanted within 2-3 weeks after 401 issuance)
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED-to be seeded with herbaceous vegetation within 2-3
weeks after 401 issuance)
® E-PROPOSED; (PERMANENT-no onsite restoration)
i
F-RIP-RAPPE AREA (riprap will be moved by hand and the area will be replanted)

0 w
m
? FEE
IM
A-
W
10
21E
F_ -
Z7
O I 217
'I
I 218
I 219
if; ( H]H OR FURNERLY \ \\
1 ` COZART . PR6£RTY \
O 1 PIN1250 175504-93-1551 \
C - C OJ \
Yw tn]o•' 1 \
1
?? ?? `1`i'1Kals? saw ?I 1f ?1I --I I._I I°11 ? II??II- \ /i \\q
Z$ 1? ? ?" I I I I ?? II ?. I ?? r ? ? ?- I I r I I • I I• I I I '? I I I I I I C: `??/? ? __ \ \ ... -
Y I I° I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I IL_J L_J _ i/ - l /_`''//
L_J L_J L_J l__J -
I r J?
? I 11 rl I ? ? •- I l r I I I I ?. ??? {I ?ASt 13 \??` 1 _- ? ti
_--J J ??J L_ _ F' SL UI -J L? ?k1_, I ?.•1I )i' ?' I I .i r
?? u-J i t I j .. 7!?` c____-•'kiASEIF; r-1 _- I •I I w ?.i 1- r? I• I I I i il•^^5?= -'a'-.` n .., n 111 ? ?
/' 1 ?J' ..`) r / -°r 1 r_ l ti r °•s- _ l •? Y WErLANL1S 1.311
17 1
IT` 1 I „ t ?3_ ? j IMPACT 3 ? i MVA(;l H ?-' ' /?
.. / ,.> / ?•a1.? ?'?' wLlurvus: ?? _ r wLiLANUS -1 !r?\,
/ /.?../ ?s /p 2 .'•-?- C . ` ,3?,c scT Fr. \`\\ ? C C •r s.
"NN
LT 1 I
r ? i \ J C i / ? 7 ^ `I I ? ' ? 1 Y ?. \ \ ?? T' ` ? r \ \ ?, .? C:HANNR
?/? 7' / • ,n ? ? ' '• \ •' \ \ I, ? R ?.WES LOVLCR, PROPERTY
/ / • \ v!\•r r. \\\, - _ 6 \/ ' 1 0! 2)91 PPGE 299
\
j ', J / ? ?? (?° ?) ///// ? ? ???: .° '?' ? - ??????• ? nbsm-IZ-3617
f __ ?1° //1 \ \ = \ ••1 ,,. ) \; ?:r\\ \ _ C - B<LEncaD \\\I \\ r I ?_IT
/ I -? I ^1 1 / ` v! n \ .'\ \ 1 wLTLArW3S: _ r a+-
/? I 1 ?? it 1 1/?/ )^ \. ,??. \? V) !.r ? -.r\ \ - - t.zs s?LT r,L 1 1 I.? I ?71.?
r _ll `?? /- \' yr \ (? ?^\` ? r' J !'•° ?? F a T 1 ?_,, 1?.. ^_-`. a+? _. ?` M? ? 1 1 ..T p I ra'. / `r ?-°
' i ? ? ? ? \ \ ? \? : ^ \? r, P ? ? t l ? ,.,,,,,._ , 3.. ,.•,{..'T°Tr ?r_ B n.w I ? I I -
?__ bl ??. 1 r ? \ \''? \ ? ' '._ \'" $ o?...? .s.. 1 ?-r t , ?z s•,, wLluNw: ?. ? _?
^ ? J
Nov R PORKRLT o • ?J f 'r -? .('?-\1 ?'°+L• X11 1
V!{ PCEIE . PROPERTT 1 C I \` '
00 1064 PAGE 128 I ? . ) ? ('. \- 1 ° 1 _ 1 -?_- ¦?? ® __?_ b.....? - __- ???1
PIN 1755D•-70-6619 i I /?` 2' I I > r? __ 1 1 _? ?L-? _ r1 ?vrll 1 sr'," _ 1- J .. -?-•• ?)
? 1 l i 111 ? I i i I r• I 1. ,-, ^J1 Ilr 1 1 _? \---J r„l ?? ? ??
LL1'1/.-_t I I I r I I I I 1 II ? . 11 l 1 ° 1 1 .°..J r = rl r ?-1 -_ ?YI, .] ?'^TS-?L"'° _ _. ??? ? ss.
I- L__? L_-? lu°I I I I L__J J
I I ° ? 1 .°.. I r? -1 1 •° I I r ? 1 1 .. I ^ r/^\ ?\?..., \ ?'\\ ?,f. 'f.'
1 . 1 I° z I -° I r? 1 I 1 I' I ?I I? I I?YI Ir I L°..1 \ j \? 1\ v.
_ 1 L m I_M_J I ?r I Lur t ? ° I I_r ./ 'Ir rJl1 v'' \.?'/ ,\
- -_, __.X Lv-J r--1 L,•^J r--1 L__? ?_4I I rJ ?_ ?? J r??1\ \ \\ M i'\ i
.I J L --~ LM4J 11 ?"•?. I L•r_J I i a"° ?,2 r-_-- ? JI ? c---; ?? \\ \ ? ) ?c ?.r ?,H`\? ? ?t
-TERL-OF
r , L I i
?!I I .l _ , ) I I ? {? 1. I.r r.? 4.... J ? ?J L ,'X^•-^TC ?_
??_-1 •R C? ''r---I r---T 4? f .?. 1, j^\ r- - J
'-? /--.^.ll `;y?1 ? •''t? ?f111 f _.-7• I° I I•._ 1 ill? i\°// •h?.r ?C,` ? Lr I
1 ,?•I ?." 11 --3 r I • ? -J r _, ,-Ire `' •°" / ?:. r •°?/
cr,a L J r--? 1° 1 r l Cs r'
AIW'fTD - i - i I ° I r__ J r,, ??'J L•»°7.. L °MJ M1TIGWE
OR LPC
^ II A.Y
o ?; f _ ? I Iux;nsroBE J I ? F?? J i -EXIS ING r i ?' • ? i .. ?\ ???? \? \J i ?T Plwnn6inr
II 1 / - f1i MOVCD BV _ --1 '?L
$ J HAND: J r - _ ? .I ° I I L -f?rl}\ - r - _ i ? \ \ / ? ?• • _
?- -l• 2120 SO. FT. 1 1 I L_ -J f __1 ? ° 1 1 ° I ? •-_'/?
NOV R PRIEQLT I I ° 1 L__J f __, r--1 > I ° I I I + ! ?l ?\;.?
K1?lT PM LT& PMtTWC OP • 1 _ J _ _ J L 1 ° _ - . I ^J I T )
DD 5946 PMX 955
REM 1154D -09-3306 ?i l __•J t- r??l , I I / I bjr `` ``? ?'?
L---, I r . I L__J 1___ l I I° I I I i° 1 I 1 ? I? ?r ?n
F L___J
- I 1 1 r'_ _J r--_l 1 j I° 1 r__ 1° I It,?J ?A_ L . ?
• 1 .. I 1 __J __ r-- I I __- rte,
--J ? J ?- ; r• I h i I L-- i ?_--a.1 ? ^ r'? ?" .?7 I ? r ? ? J...
_ . 1 1 ° I . I I 'i L.-J I--- ?+?r-- / ? r? 1 \ \\ 1 `j ( r`` _ I uavrKn in(
L__J - - is r' i \ \ • \ ` ? ? I ?
I ? . j r---, r--t r-? r-,I i ,1 I II II . II ? • 1 I - 11 II • I 1 • II 11 J L 11(- ?. I . ;; CDfL S?MW
_____'/ I • I I II • II II• I i • II II• I1 I I I I 1. // ? \ ?.L
L___? ?• I I I I J J L. `__ _ ti
MTORQIG wUL(N
_----
-, 1 --_---__-_= MB9'YIIM- 1!1.24' -?
1 r-
1 - NOV R LORNERLY I -IIL
SGMRE I PR I"
? j D! 20.6 PIiEf 166 EKISTnG pMIN lW(? ?
PIM I7N.Off99-35.Y
V
zsa.l ?
-yL
294.1
GRAPHIC SCALE \
1 300' '94
300 0 300 600
1 I
Z1 ,
R9gulato Division
Action ID. ' 200321218
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO 6(.X 1890
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
November 20, 2003
Mr. Jerry Gower
7324 Siemans Road
Wendell, North Carolina 27591

Dear Mr. Gower:
Please reference your conversation with Ms. Andrea Wade of the Raleigh Regulatory Field
Office on August 4, 2003, regarding our investigation of unauthorized discharges of fill material
associated the construction of Emerald Pointe, a residential subdivision located on the east side of
Old Knight Road, northeast of its intersection with Terry Lane in Knightdale, Wake County, North
Carolina. The site is adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Marks Creek in the Neuse River Basin.
On July 25, 2003, Ms. Wade conducted a site inspection on your property with Mr. Steve
Mitchell of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality and Mr. Kevin Hughes of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps). The purpose of this inspection was to review the site for impacts to
waters and wetlands subject to Department of the Army (DA) permitting authority. The site visit
revealed the placement of fill within two unnamed tributaries to Marks Creek, both of which exhibit
indicators of important aquatic function. This activity resulted in greater than 300 linear feet of
stream impacts. The site also contains several wetland areas of undetermined size. While the
removal of trees and other vegetation from upland areas on the site does not require DA permit
authorization; mechanized land clearing activities within the wetland areas on site has directly
impacted in excess of 0.1 acre of wetland. These activities, conducted in waters of the United Sates
without authorization by a DA permit, are a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1311) The Corps is currently considering an appropriate response to this unauthorized
activity, including potential referral of this matter to the U.S. Attorneys Office.
During your conversation with Ms. Wade on August 4, 2003, you indicated that you would
cease and desist from any further fill activities in waters or wetlands on the`property. While
complete restoration of the impacted streams and wetlands on the site (i.e., replanting with native
wetland tree species) will resolve the violation, you may also choose to submit an after-the fact
individual DA permit application (application enclosed) for the existing and proposed work.
Please note that our acceptance of an after-the-fact permit application does not imply, by the
Corps of Engineers or other agencies, either a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the work
performed. Should you choose to pursue after-the-fact authorization, further action on the
violation will be suspended pending the outcome of this consideration.
-2-
Also, please note that all individual DA permit applications will be evaluated in accordance
with procedures established in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the DA and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), signed on February 6, 1990. The MOA clarifies
the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1)
Guidelines. This MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands through the
selection of the least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical
steps to minimize impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any remaining
unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. To comply with this MOA, you are
required to provide the following information in support of your after-the-fact permit application:
a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available only if the
proposed work is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. Your application
must contain information regarding any other alternatives, both on and off site, to the work for
which you have applied, and demonstrate that your selected plan is the least damaging to aquatic
resources.
b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practical steps to minimize losses to
waters of the U.S. Documentation submitted in support of your permit application must indicate
all that you have done; especially regarding the modification of plans and proposed construction
techniques, to minimize adverse impacts (i.e., to reduce the discharge of fill material into waters
of the United States as much as practicable). Your response should address alternate site designs,
which may result in reduced impacts to the aquatic environment.
c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practical mitigation (e.g., restoration, enhancement,
and/or preservation of wetlands and stream channels) will be required for all unavoidable adverse
impacts remaining after all appropriate and practical minimization has been employed. Please
note that mitigation may be required for all direct and indirect impacts that result in a degradation
of the aquatic resources on site.
Please submit your completed after-the-fact permit application or restoration plan to the
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office no later than December 5, 2003. If additional time is required
for restoration of the site or to prepare your permit application, you should contact my staff with
a request for an extension of time, providing justification(s) for the delay. Please be reminded
that no further work within wetlands or waters can occur on your property until this matter is
resolved. Such work, without authorization by a DA permit, will be considered a willful and
intentional violation of the Clean Water Act.
-3-
Please contact Ms. Wade at [phone], extension 31, if you have any questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
S. Kenneth Jolly
Chief, Regulatory Division
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
U.S. Attorney
Eastern District of North Carolina
310 New BernAvenue
Federal Building, Suite 800
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1461
E
Mr. Ron Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Section-Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. John Dorhey
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural! Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
war?RQ ?.
O G:
r.
-f
Y
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Co nstruction
Attention: Jeerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
September 9, 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Divigion of Water Quality was notified by receipt
of your Pre-construction Notification Application of your f?quest for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for Emerald Pointe Subdivision located along Old Knight Road in Wake, County. In addition, this
office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003, Notice of Violation issued to you from the
Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
i
After.review of this information, the DWQ requested additional information. A written
response to this request was received on July 13, 2004. Further, you and your consultants meet with
NCDENR legal council for the Department and DWQ staff on August 10, 2004 regarding the
remaining concerns on this project. After this review we believe that your project should be place on
hold. We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project
to continue p [ rsuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and
wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration
proposed„a schedule for implementation of the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in
your response. (Note: please specifically include the linear feet and areas, planting time table,
monitorin { plan for each respective impact location).
2) Please provide the percent impervious surfaces for each phases of the subdivision.
3) Please provide plans that address stormwater management for Phase 3.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is
the understanding of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to
abate violations and stem or minimize the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty
Assessments. ?ks explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of Violation, penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response tothis additional
i
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application
such that you may achieve project compliance.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information (items
1-3 above) is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume
you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Program
ds
cc:
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
NCDENR - Mary Penny Thompson
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
040584emeraldpt(wake)hold2.doc
F P? ?f
a
0
o 0 0.
24
S? c?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 27, 2004
Requested
mention: Jeriry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department we believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal Founcil from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/Aol Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
T
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and ripariap areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project I ompliance.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
s

If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance wi
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we di
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
ds
cc:
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
Sincerely,
`I j
I orney
Water Quality Certi ation Program

1k
•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
i
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
JUL 13 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
,
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as listed in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
area, and wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
After speaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarification of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 320 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice a year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
general dimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed impact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads have been installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
i
Charlotte Office: I Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C, 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone , [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NC-EEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney General['s] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the WetlandslWl Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer (exemptl from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following. 1), the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
- -- - riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittal.
Please fall or email me at SC1arkQSandEC.com if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincerely,
?a?nClarko
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
I
Grover Construction
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
JUN - 1. 2004
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NQ 27591
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
j
? Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along', Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office ofthe Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department w6 believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
I
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However,, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal, council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/,401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, ;riparian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
i
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project'compliance.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/noweVands/
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 21-1.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Program
ds
cc:
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
Sincerely,
't A&
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Michael F. Easley, Governor
May 26, 2004
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614 j
Resources
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary,,
JUN - , .
Subject: Project: Emerald Pointe
County: Wake
I
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
i
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Ri arian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 1 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max 434 0.6506
The stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
i
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely, , n
Deborah D. Anderson,
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly,, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade,'; USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC QENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Phone: [phone] `FAX: [phone] ! Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.usi"vrrp/
NorthCarolina
Natutrallff
VV/Go/LUVY 1J. 1J rKA 27127 Jou 27l J4 "UrrIn %lun51 11V1.
Wj UL
TOWN OF K.IUGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO 13ox 640 0 Knightdaley NC 27545
Office (919) 217-22,11! 0 Fax [phone]
June 23,
Mr_ Steve Mitchell
DWQ - RRO
NCDENR1
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III
Zoning Vested Rights
NBRRO 99-040
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on June 19, 1996 the Town of Knight] ale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Pointy, Subdivision. Phases I
& 11 have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate limits, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase IIA of this approv;?I subdivision includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 acres of land. With this project approval fh a Town Council has
granted Mr.!, Jerry Gower and the Emerald Point Subdivision zoning, vested rights i : complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
I
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Phut;e III, Mr. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special asp': permit to accommodase
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on M.ct 3, 2004 the Knightdak
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, permitting the redesign of the roadway networl.. and lot layout at the _
expense of street connectivity and potential public safety access issues.
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone]
1
Sincerely,
Michael S. Frangos, AICP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knightdale
.,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard JUL 13 2004
Raleigh, NC 27604
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr: Dorney:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as listed in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
area, and wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
Afterspeaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarifi cation of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 320 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice a year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
general dimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed impact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads have been installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
I
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone-[phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NC EEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NGEEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney General['s] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the Wetlands1401 Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer [exempt] from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following: 1). the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
-- - - - riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittal.
I 'I
I
Please all or email me at [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
I
Sincerely,
?an Clark
Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map

Michael F. Easley
Q Governor
N7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
``C i Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 27, 2004
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Contruction JUN - 1 2004
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
` Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
I Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office ofthe Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussion with legal council for the Department wd believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please prof ide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violation
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and'401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussion
with legal council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/ 401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
i
I
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violation and stem or minimize
the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on bold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project compliance.
North Carolina Division of Water.Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwefands/
i
Emerald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 040584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
1 Water Quality Certification Program
ds v
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
'Raleigh, NC 27614
e??
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
May 26, 2004
Sean Clark i
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road ,
Raleigh, NC 27614 1
Subject: Project: Emerald Pointe
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May It, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accent for this nroiect is also indicated in this table.
Stream
linear feet Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Ri arian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.
Impact i 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max i 434 0.6506
The stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for;impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely, ' n
Deborah D. Anderson,
i
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell,jDWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program NoOne
rthl.aTOlllla
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619 //
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp; ?atj?r'a[[y
11 ?
VV/ GO/ LvV4 1.). 1J r11A VIV J0.7 H/J4 l U"ZA %1VA01 Ink, , q/J VG
TOWN OF K.IUGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 0 Knightdale, NC 27545
Office (919) 217-22,N) t Fax [phone]
June 23,
Mr. Steve Mitchell
DWQ - RRO
NCDENRj
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
r
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III
Zoning Vested Rights
NBRRO 99-040
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on rune 19, 1996 the Town of Knight] ale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Pointy. Subdivision. Phases I
& II have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate limits, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase Iil of this approv;5i subdivision includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 acres of land. With this project approval fhe Town Council has
granted Mr. Jerry Gower and the Emerald Point Subdivision zoning vested rights i -. complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
i
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Ph;i;e III, Mr. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special us,:: permit to accommodase
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on M..ci 3.2004 the Knightdale
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, pernutting the redesign of the roadway network and lot layout at the _
expense of street connectivity and potential public safety access issues.
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone].
Sincerely,
i
Michael S. Frangos, AICP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knightdale
7324 Siemans Road
Wendell, NC 27591
i
;
u
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
i
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
JUL 13 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
i
Dear Mr. Domey:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy `attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as listed in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland1401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
area, and wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
After SPeaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarification of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 320 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice a, year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
general dimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed impact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads have been installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
i
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1r
to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NGEEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NGEEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney General f's] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the WetlandslWl Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer [exempt] from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following: l). the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact' 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
- riparian areas that are.proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittal.
'I I
Please call or email me at [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincerely,
1
anClark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map
?0 QGI
>
y`
L ? D.-Ai,
C] ,
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
I
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Construction
Attention: Jeri y Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
i
I
I
Dear Sirs:
May 27, 2004
JUN - 1. 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office o€,the Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department wei believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a? the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plaris and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian!areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office thatthe subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project compliance.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands/
Emerald Pointe
Jdrry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
1 Water Quality Certification Program
ds U
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
1
NCDENR
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
i
Michael F. Easlev, Governor
i
May 26, 2004
i
Sean Clark j
Soil & Environmental
11010 Raven Ridge R
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject:
Consultants, PA
Resources
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
JUN - ..;
Emerald Pointe
Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
j
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of Mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
I Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer

ft.)
(s q.
Impact 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max 434 0.6506
The stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for,impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone]
Sincerely, ,, nn
Dhva-
Deborah D. Anderson,
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell,' DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
I
i
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1619 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619 NorthCarollna
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/ Naturallff

Vu/40/4UU4 io.1J rna alto 000 tol04 uunnx S-Unal llv- Wj ut
1?KTb TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 41, Knightdale, NC 27545
Office (919) 217-22,111 0 Fax [phone]
ACA
June 23, 2004
Mr_ SteveiMitchell
DWQ - RRO
NCDENR!
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III
Zoning Vested Rights
NBRRO 99-040
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on rune 19, 1996 the Town of Knightdale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Point[; Subdivision. Phases I
& II have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate litt[its, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase IA of this approv 5i subdivision includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 aems of land. With this project approval fh a Town Council has
granted Ivlr Jerry Gower and the Emerald Point Subdivision zoning, vested rights t : complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Ph[i;e III, Mr. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special us,:: permit to aeeommodaie
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on Kci 3.2004 the Knightdate
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, permitting the redesign of the roadway network and lot layout at the _
expense of street connectivity and potential public safety access issues.'
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone].
Sincerely, j
Michael S. Frangos, A1CP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knghtdale
7324!Siemans Road
Wendell, NC 27591

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
NC Division of Water Quality WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd. JUL 1 3 2004
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604 WATER QUAD fy SECTION
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr Dorney:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy, attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as listed in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland1401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
ar'ea' and wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
I
After speaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarification of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 320 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice a year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
general, dimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed impact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads have been installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
Greensboro Office:
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NC-EEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NC EEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney Generalrs] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the Wetlands1401 Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer [exempt] from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following. 1). the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact' 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
- - riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittal.

i
Please; call or email me at SClarkQSandEC.com if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincerely,
an Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map
f]
ii
AT9 !i Michael F. Easley
QG I Governor
rI William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`C{ Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
wool,
May 27, 2004
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Construction JUN - 1 2004
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
f:
Wendell, NC 127591
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
l Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office of?the Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department we believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
i
1) Please provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility of, continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project compliance.
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
I
3) Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact"401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwe0ands/
I
Eme*ald Pointe
Jerry Gower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
1 Water Quality Certi*ation Program
ds U
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
"Raleigh, NC 27614
. \ P
NCDENR
Michael F. Easley,
May 26, 2004
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
L _T
JUN _
Raleigh, NC 27614 j
I
Subject: Project: Emerald Pointe
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max 434 0.6506
The stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for; impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely, a
Deborah D. Anderson,
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.usivwrp/
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NorthCarohna
Naturally
i
VV/coi LVV•! loll.) r111A Ulu dud U104 "VrZn %Iunol Ing-, - U. VL
I I
TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 0 Knightdale, NC 27545
Office (919) 217-22,14) 0 Fax [phone]
June 23,
Mr- SteveMitchell
DWQ - RRO
NCDENR
1628 Mail, Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
1
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III
Zng Vested Rights
Zoning
NBRRO 99-040
Dear W. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on June 19, 1996 the Town of Knightdale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Pointy. Subdivision. Phases I
& II have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate limits, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase 111 of this approyA subdivismn includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 acres of land. With this project approval fhe Town Council has
granted Mr. Jerry Gower and the Emerald Point Subdivision zoning vested rights I : complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Phase III, Mr. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special us, permit to aceommodame
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on Kci 3.2004 d?e Knightdate
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, permitting the redesign of the roadway network and lot layout at the _
expense of street connectivity and potential public safety access issues.
I
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone].
I
Sincerely,
2a
Michael S. Frangos, A1CP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knightdale
QQhN
7324 Siernans Road
Wendell, NC 27591
I
I
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
July 13, 2004
S&EC Project # 8121.W1
DWQ #04-0584
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: lY1r. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
JUL 1 3 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
i
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's May 27, 2004 Request for Further
Information for the Emerald Pointe Residential Subdivision in Knightdale, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mr'. Dorney:
This letter is in response to the DWQ letter dated May 27, 2004 (copy attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Emerald Pointe Subdivision. The
following restates your questions as listed in your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide the Wetland1401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside
area, and wetland restoration plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing
the restoration proposed, a schedule for the implementation of the restoration, and
include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
I
After speaking with Mr. Steve Mitchell of the Raleigh Regional Office for
clarification of what is being requested, the following is a description of the
restoration. The wetland areas being replanted (see attached map) will be planted
with 320 stems per acre so as to ensure 260 plants per acre after 5 years. No more
than 20% of any one species will be planted. Species included in the planting will
resemble those found in the adjacent areas such as Red Maple, Tulip poplar, Sweet
gum, Elm, Willow Oak, etc. The plants will be planted in the autumn so as to
increase the probability of a higher survival rate. Survival counts will be conducted
twice ? year to ensure that the planted vegetation is still in place. The restored
portions of stream will be monitored once a year and 1 to 2 cross sections and
longitudinal profiles will be made to make sure that the areas have maintained their
general dimensions. To avoid impacting restored areas, the cleared areas adjacent to
proposed impact areas will not be restored until after the proposed utilities and
roads have been installed. All previously impacted areas have been seeded in order
I
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
jFax: [phone] ?i Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
to temporarily stabilize the areas. A payment to the NC-EEP has been proposed in
order to mitigate for the proposed permanent impacts on the property (see attached-
copy of the preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP).
2. In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules.
This determination was communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the
Attorney General l's] Office dated June 6, 2000. However, a) the local governments
(Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations have
occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and 401 Certifications.
Therefore, after discussions with legal council from the NC Department of Natural
Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the Wetlands/401 Unit that
Phase 3 of the subdivision (not phases 1 and 2) is no-longer [exempt] from the riparian
buffer rules. Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers,
depict riparian buffers that have been impacted, riparian areas that are proposed to be
restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to appropriately address these
matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2)
on the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
Although the site plan within Phase 3 of the subdivision has changed (in order to
reduce proposed impacts to wetlands and streams), the subdivision still has the Town
of Knightdale's approval (see attached letter) and should therefore still be
grandfathered from the buffer rules. The fact that 401 violations have occurred on
site may be cause for fines or a notice of violation but should not affect the previous
grandfathering determination. For this reason the site plan has not been altered to
show riparian buffers. An office meeting should be scheduled if this should need to
be discussed further.
3. Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the
following: 11 the wetland, streams, and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as
proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all wetlands, stream, and
- riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas
that have been impacted, but are proposed to be restored..
The impact map submitted to your office on April 13, 2004 with the PCN
application, outlined the areas that had been impacted previously. It also
differentiated between the areas that are currently filled/impacted, areas that were
previously cleared and will now be restored and areas that were previously cleared
that will require a 401/404 permit to complete the proposed impacts as requested
above. All of the other stream and wetland areas that are shown on the map that are
not shown as previously impacted or previously cleared are areas that will and have
been avoided. An additional 1:100 scale copy of the originally submitted map is
attached to each copy of this transmittal.
I(I
r
Please call or email me at [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any
further explanation.
Sincerely, an
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Copy of DWQ letter (May 27, 2004)
Copy of preliminary acceptance letter from the NC-EEP
Letter from the Town of Knightdale
Overall impact map
01- 'Ny Michael F. Easley
- QG Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
i7 Y 1 Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Registered Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Grover Construction
Attention: Jerry Gower
7324 Siemens Rd.
Wendell, NC 27591
May 27, 2004
JUN - 1. 2004
Subject: Additional Information Request & on Hold Notification
Emerald Pointe
Old Knight Road
DWQ 04-0584
Wake County
Dear Sirs:
i
On April 13, 2004, Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality was notified by receipt of your Pre-
construction Notification Application of your request for a 401 Water Quality Certification for Emerald Pointe Subdivision
located along Old Knight Road in Wake County. In addition, this office received a file copy of the November 4, 2003,
Notice of Violation issued to you from the Raleigh Regional Office of?the Division of Water Quality. After review of this
information, and discussions with legal council for the Department we believe that your project should be place on hold.
We will require you to address the following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2B .0500.
1) Please Provide the Wetland/401 Unit with seven (7) copies of the stream, streamside area, and wetland restoration
plans for the site. In addition, a written account detailing the restoration proposed, a schedule for implementation of
the restoration, and include a 3 year monitoring plan in your response.
2) In 2000, this tract was determined to be vested from the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules. This determination was
communicated to DWQ in the form of an opinion letter from the Attorney General Office dated June 6, 2000.
However, a) the local governments (Knightdale) authorization has since expired, b) numerous water quality violations
have occurred on this site, including failures to secure 404 Permits and'401 Certifications. Therefore, after discussions
with legal council from the NC Department of Natural Resources (Mary Penny Thompson), it is the opinion of the
Wetlands/401 Unit that Phase 3 of the subdivision (not the phases 1 and 2) is no-longer from the riparian buffer rules.
Accordingly, please provide plans that depict the Neuse Riparian Buffers, depict riparian buffers that have been
impacted, ri parian areas that are proposed to be restored and modify your Pre-construction Application to
appropriately address these matters. Please be certain that all lots are buildable, depict buffers (zone 1 and zone 2) on
the maps, and show the amount of impacts.
3) Provide plans and a respective table that can be matched to the plans that depict the following: 1) the wetland, streams,
and riparian areas that are proposed to be impacted as proposed in the "after-the-fact" 401 Certification request, 2) all
wetlands, stream, and riparian areas that are proposed to be avoided, 3) wetlands, streams, and riparian areas that have
been impacted, but are proposed to be restored.
A Notice of Violation from the Raleigh Regional Office has been issued for this project. It is the understanding
of this office that the subject 401 modification request represents your efforts to abate violations and stem or minimize
the possibility of continued or additional Civil Penalty Assessments. As explained in the November 4, 2003 Notice of
Violation, penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation may be assessed. Your response to this additional
information/on hold notification will enable us to provide an appropriate review of your application such that you may
achieve project compliance.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.no.us/ncweVands/
Emerald Pointe
Jerry 6ower
DWQ No. 04-0584
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny Smith at (919)
733-9716 or Steve Mitchell at [phone]. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not
hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will
consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
Water Quality Certification Program
ds \IJ
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
DWQ- Non-Discharge Compliance Unit - Jeff Poupart
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, Soils and Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Road,
Raleigh, NC 27614
,l
t .
I
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
May 26, 2004
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Load N - T
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Project: Emerald Pointe
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate. i
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s . ft.)
Impact i 217 0.3253
Mitigation Max 1 434 0.6506
the stream and riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for'Jmpacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Deborah D. Anderson,
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit 1
Andrea Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell„ DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Phone: [phone], FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/vvrp/
Naturally
VV/ LO/ LVU4 1.7.14
I
L(tl U L
TOWN OF KfUGHTDALE
950 Steeple Square Court • PO Box 640 0 Knightdale; NC 27545
Office (919) 217-22,14) t Fax [phone]
June 23, 2004
Mr. Steve Mitchell
DWQ - RRO
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
RE: Emerald Point Subdivision, Phase III
Zoning Vested Rights
NBRRO 99-040
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that on June 19, 1996 the Town of Knightil ale Town Council
approved SU-1-96 granting preliminary plat approval for the entire Emerald Pointe: Subdivision. Phases I
& 11 have been constructed to the Town's satisfaction, are within the corporate limits, and public
infrastructure has been dedicated for public maintenance. Phase III of this approv .i subdivision includes
96 single-family detached lots on 36.99 acres of land. With this project approval I•he Town Council has
granted Mr. Jerry Gower and the Emerald Point Subdivision zoning, vested rights i -, complete the project as
proposed, designed, reviewed and originally approved.
i
Due to issues raised by the US Army Corps of Engineers and your office about Pha;e III, W. Gower was
required to petition the Knightdale Town Council to amend the original special use;: permit to alccommodase
Neuse River riparian area rules and more stringent wetland laws. Therefore on M,.ci 3.2004 the Knightdak
Town Council, approved SU-2-04, permitting the redesign of the roadway networl. and lot layout at the _
expense of street connectivity and potential public safety access issues.
If you need any additional information please call my office at [phone].
Sincerely,
sue" ,???zo
Michael S. Frangos, A1CP, ZO
Planning Director
Town of Knightdale
Q -j
7324 Siemans Road
Wendell, NC 27591
i
r JILA 27131 4Va U144 1.V 1/r,1( l.VAJ1 IM,
Triage Check List
Date:

Project Name: P'tY"e_'C't=Wo S f L
DWQ#: Ot-[ - OS 1 L?
County: ?-?-e-
{
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
i
ZKII?Z Steve Mitchell
From:
? Wa.RO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephones (919) , -735- 1-7
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance. .
i
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps.
KzfferRul nimization/ 'dance issues
(Neu Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
Is.the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: U1
What Else
Subject: What Else
From: Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:40:11 -0400
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
04- 0723
04-0724
04-0725
04-0661
04-0621
04-0584 Emerald Pointe..... don't know what to do about this one. Enforcement has been
signed for 9 non-permitted crossings, two were piped. 31k and change
ACOE has issued NW 12 and 39 with special conditions requiring mitigation fof 0.3253
acres of wetland and 217 if of stream and the restoration of 0.6506 acres of hardwood
wetland forest and 434 if of stream

i
I of 1 5/13/04 1:45 PM
INSET 1
i R
-
A I / NOV OR fORC T
O PIN 1)55.04-9]-1551
1258 - E- 83 V727 O?
? AA? ? _ T I n n I •w •n i(y?„ i? - II-CiT S,:TN
Z W Cn` A- •Swn wLTL A ' J \V\ -4..-. i ce
Ili • 175 5Q. FT _ ?-
l
n _
Q _ LZ... n 4r _- + GIANNEL: T \ / f '- 1 1 '? PAC 9
149 IIN FT. C it,^
0 {? pc. , WETLANDS:
rr. '"? u ? ? ?•? ? 231 SO. R. w E ? I
1?EE--ww,? puR IMPACT2 40lIN. FT. ??" IiAC17 V'
`•.?••I ..n _ ' i4; E11, DTI MNIXNAV J ^?? L ? j C I t 1.1-?(Xy1RY
\?ff ? ?_ I ? ll •rn31o?! 131 11/F+^? ? - J -. • \t w!u Io,l? IMlnc 1 e
?? Imo/, 179 SO. FT: 1 t ?a,? rur.uzv: 1 c Et ILO `.
P•' „+ wETUNLU.
y 9450. R.
r 1791 1 50. FT 1 i \ l -s \ + ( +ANNEI
FT: ) O T
..•"l x.l PT ¢ MIAC 10
v ?
1 ? ?/..'t ? •/?- _. 1 Wit- C-1f MPlW.nRV
{ IIMPACT3 \ ??? M A(:I6 ? LF %iSTIN(?)
NLIS:
T? 81:1. Ln 1CD Y Fi{IFA4IFD <- -ILA
???•M.. WLILANLIS: WETLANCS 617 SO FT.
1;169 SO FT. 1193 SO FT ? i?????4\)
CANNEL
F TI n ?'? / jil, Af -TI-, HHHaaa ?/ WEI LANUS.
{ 'IY7V _n: 522 SO-FT- ??.\ v\? ?r/ \ ?r\ C _\\'1 `•. ??n\
/ •? 7 '°?'/ _ \ v ?^ /?'? L r~ - l? NOv OR FOPNEPLV
ED
/ / O `?r / 4 _/ •w\ ,HI FBVLER, PROPERTY
239103PAGE -1299
,, A \\/?// ^ .a. _ ? PIN lN IJ65032-361)
O ?. J
.Y? 1•MPACT 14 M!'A(,i 13 - 1 ?. ? I -IMPACT 11
• IMPACT 15 [)-TF MP(%y?RV tl CI 1N 11 0 1 r ? ? 1 E C-TEMPCIIARV
V u FI
ETLAN LAW C)) WETLANLi,S. _ }}pI? 1 )
D {ITIM,NV NAT W." 1258 SQ, FT.? ??I / WE1LANl}S:
+}? u ?. . WEI LANDS- P71 SO FT. _I 808650 FT.
29950 FT
O N ??^ CHANNEL - ? ? ` , Mr AcT , z { ' {-•.-.
a ? ?? `?. -121 ?1? ? •_\T"4? .;? tl<'lFa11D
?q - J_ ? \ / /? ?.... r g _~? ?-a? ? ?" ?`??-•.,? ?.. wtILANL>5. ? Ida = ? ??..
NOV OR FORICRLr A-
1I Po4E PROPERTY
T P N` yy?
09 1064 PILE 129 I '? ^ + { w \' _ rfi IlJ i 7
PIN lls3A4-J0 -6649 ? I _ Ilia
a r SSS? S
I ?
O
.A
S 3r?J
?r r WLTLANUS I u WETLANDS ? l
_ I &57 50 R I ? _ 828 SO. FT.
u
Wx.SII6N_ _ ?? ? ? •
- FN^II?TWnTl]
A `0A LTLANUS PNNOW TIOI OR FOR
CTTE P
j Hlh:KS TO BE 1 W9 50. FT (-P ^ 1? r /uu PIN 176503-
8 = REMOVED BV ? L \\\?\/I? ate,
FIANU.
2120 50. F T. -
IMPA(;L 20 ?.
A I %I?.1INV?
• ? GIANfJf-L:?
N W OR FOR My
KMTT PARK LTM PARTNERSHIP b 1 <.
DB 5946 PAGE 953 T-? - J
PIN 1734-08-89-3186 f8 LIN. FT.
- ? ? `I? ? / II. I
-_ ? ? ? ? ? ? ICJ ? f ? C ? (A
? `--J ? I ? I O t6,
o ?. c a-TI
.n
'r'°?,•? ITONHC rtu(Np SWAMP
? _ Na11TOmNC \?!:
:.l
N99-JGX E 1)]414' -
NOW OR f.11
SQWEE D . PROPERTY
DI 2046 PAGE 166 EXISTING [MAIN LRK
CATEGORIES PIN 173,FN "'?'? _YL
A-EXISTING 2`94.1
B-CLEARED _yL
294.1 V
- - Rl
294.1
D-TEMPORARY (PROPOSED) GRAPHIC SCALE
E-PROPOSED (PERMANENT) 1 " = 300'
F-RIP-RAPPED AREA 300 0 300 600
(TO BE REMOVED BY HAND)
264 `
266 267
N
y? 265
276 ? 317
243
106+82.1452 V
0.000?iL
n * 242
277
IMPACT 15
E-PROPOSED
J. 202 * 241 (PERMANENT)
;22 S.F. •Q WETLANDS:
298 SQ. FT.
203 2 ,RA1P 1`14 o CHANNEL:
7,279 S.F. `+ %K40.B.M191 122 LIN. FT.
TOP=3066' 60
INV-30 60 NV+?10i
C'
/ 40 .F.-36 80.66 1??
204 oCN' .8
11,319 S.F. F S. ?'I9 1 q 1N
v One" 1 ? cNV IN
Jv / IQCl' 313CMJ -? V
1 SF\\1A/// 3WCHS d Jr? p?
?. JJ 9 y ..3.'..1
C q?SJ43
JC 9 ?7 3033 P01 , A /415
S
? ,. ?+3?16a 239
EK-RALD
205 * 238 PH'SE 2
12.027 S.F. 7,653 S.F.
237
206 7,454 S.F.
I 8,550 S.F.
230
* 207
7,480 S.F.
8,245 S.F.
;} 235
=7.4.4S81
F
234 PT = 43+45
2U9 7,313 S.F.
7,441 S.F.
F
210 7.320 S.F.
? 7,440 S.F.
F 12
316 1
IMPACT 14 IMPACT 13
D-TEMPORARY B-CLEARED
(PROPOSED) WETLANDS:
WETLANDS: 1255 SQ. FT.
871 SQ. FT.

?24:LF,i2 .)6.Rt P8I.OCR h
314 I
TRA /20
280 B,6?
8,563 S.F.
312
281 8,751 S.F.
8,522 S.F.
311
282 8,728 S.F.
8,6 F
HS 11310
283 8,811 S.F.
8,763 S.F.
309
L84 8,695 S.F.
8,626 S.F.
308
* 285 PT = 70A
8,052 S.F.
6165 S.F.
F-1 77-1
30
6
L23 2
8,520 S.F. I
1
PRIVATE 1
56 L
C_?\\ 322
323 \
590 SF
,PrgP L` "y``r
C.B. 13
® TOP 301.7
321 INV= 96.2
320 mf
?>
?m
Zp
319
IMPACT 12
B-CLEARED
WETLANDS:
30 1719 SQ. FT,
>F p- sa
}? C
V SitiA
311< ?p 1 ..
® -C.B.?4
?, = 3 9.607 S.F PRNA '? yti 0'.
20' DRAu F _
329 f EASEMFttj j, Z
8,272 S.F. 1 (TYP);j81&'.'1??
10,560 _
284.45 TRAP 2
333
X328 9,042 S.F.
7,077 S.F.
a
F
j 336
* 327 7,774 S.F.
PRI TE DRAINAG
7,162 S.F. ASF IE "T
J: 334
8,044 S.F. * 335
7,515 S.F.
II 326
I ? 7,142 S.F. ? ?
340 341 342 343
10,001 S.F. 8,597 S.F. 8,859 S.F.- 6.673 S.F.
339 * 352
9,327S.F. I I _._\\ 346 S.F
79 1
l '13'
INSET 2
3A
EASEME b. ?
?
EWER
? ? bog ?
*78 NOW OR FORME
RLY
41CA
JAMES FOWLER, PROPERTY
411A

GRAPHIC SCALE
DB 2391 PAGE 299
4 1 100'
PIN 1765.03-12 -3617
40 A bA
100
0 100 200
bO A 415AFtCN
?
! IMPACT 11
C-TEMPORARY
76 41Z;Q, j' (EXISTING)
J ay,3,7(3SF WETLANDS:
','Ai 1 8066 SQ. FT. , L-1
_w
I?
17AL
3
I IBA 41 ATTCH
= 7 ?. 41 A (OLD TRAP b8)
75 ) 4
ATTWAP
23
+- F.H.
..
#
6A
116A 0 EXIST. MH
/
\J
5
0-PROP. MH
`
., N - GATE VALVE
AA -CURB INLET
9 0 - EXIST. CURB INLET
90 ';. Sa i? 1. b1 ?
tOGSiREAA "A L=Z6' I
.. Q' FER W=30' 11
I
1376 N O

- z 103
?
1 l

?
P = .6 •""' S.F.
1 = 91. 6 V
2D U71L1TY * 72
EASE?IENT7,163 S.F
(TYP) IBS 3.
71
7,663 S.F.
345
344 10.216 S.F.
8.606 S.F.
346
351
8.715 S.F.
70 1
9,081 S.F.
69
9.144 S.F.
68
i 9.144 S.F.
67 "
A 9,110 S.F., _

0 1 ? I S ,.
jcn
,3 0
19 139 8,640 S.F. y 210 7.320 S.F.
L
}., I v 7,440 S.F. 286 2
ZJ G f -----?. * 232 I 8,520 S.F. 7F 352 351 i/\ \
\\78,346 S.F.
S ¦`/??(,J 9,38,715 SF. -1, 47 , ?, N
E ?+ I O 160 * 211 7.320 S.F. I 8,520 S.E I ` 9,499 S.F. 8,011 S.F. 1
I A}
i 140 8,640 S.F. I 7,440 S.F. I 287 NA
I`----?I
5
7,647 S.F. xp * 350
D PC
305 IMPACT 19 8,201 S.F.
2 * 2,2 IMPACT 18 A-EXISTING 1
153 7,440 S.F. A-EXISTING * 288 8.512 S.F. j 349 348 l
8,640 S.F. ? ?
PO.N141 S/0 I 8,347 S.F. WETLANDS: 9,022 S.F. 10,969 S.F.
WETLANDS: 354 PRIVATE
657 SQ. FT. 826 SQ. FT. 2D' O"AINA
z z^-- ° e '- 9,024 SE EASEMENT
213 NO 46
22 I - 158 I 2 74 t •.,? FES A10
9,108 9,127 S.F. 4 +
STQ4224+65 33 ? w S@ ??+ 1s ass ? ?
k G 21195 -? Iu k?dti
a n, FES ?'8 [ ?, ? CB d1 (aecP 9.719 S.F.
2a w ^ c+ c, l_1 ti ES )J11 356
- °} 6 Fm n ` 29 I > 1+?kb35 6038
304
.yam m u n
24+42 „ ^" > n n 269 • LT 6o2CLCn3 8,058 S.F. 254
1 95' LT 4 ,I'h, f n n C Y 3 4 CB' S is 357
yy?}} ? ,? N47
EA CRALDIPDINTE S/ 1 19 n? # IMPACT 17 229 1 7,804 S.F. PRIVA Up NAGS
EASEMENT
LLLI
23 8,195 S.F. 353
IMPACT 16 A-EXISTING 303 360 350
F-RIP-RAPPED ? 290 '
Gee AREA 57 WETLANDS: 228 8. 82 S.F.
I
24 I ROCKS TO BE 1059 SQ. FT. I EXI IfrlG 361
370
REMOVED BY 291
HAND: 227 PHA 371 FE+, 4 s,
56 ? D h
CB 2120 SQ. FT. 216 362 372
25 I 292 IMPACT 20
J 46 226 A-EXISTING
I? o
155 0 21 0 0 363 CHANNEL:
o 0 300 369 68 LIN. FT.
26 293
225 i ? i z ;'
-Ti o
364
I
Kj I r
i = 21+12,29 374
27 I 47 299 I
294 • I 375
224 ?
I 219 . I 365 I= 1 9
148 367 368 298 ?2D+485
153 I
28
j
I
I 295 © I
I 223 i I -
366 C8 #2
D '.
220 S 1 1 -'.:..:
I i 1/ 1 A \ I' ?.
? I
29 149 152 i 297 I n / / / +
69. 95 2s6 B B 116 +
o
I
OFFSET: 00 0 L a °
222 RG p "E" 54, 57
30 221
151 !
ISD 53
1\? 52 C 4 376
-°?
31
STA: 30+61.583 50 GRAPHIC SCALE
49
47 48 +11 113
1 » = 100'
44 45 46 3 RT 55
ED
:::32 F 42 43 100 0 1 00 200 g
36 41
38 n39 40
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA 016623
NC Division of Water 16623
Quality Check Number:
Date: 04/13/04 Check Amt: $475.00
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference Balance Discount pay Amount
2737 041304 Invoice 04/13/04 PCN LZ ( $475.00 $0.00 $475.00
Aiz,
Kayo
? 9'°;f' s??or
9?F? Is cps, ? 04058*
?oool
?
s -
UNITED TATES POSTAL SERVICE
1
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality l
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
0 l
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Grover Construction
7324 Siemens Road
Wendell, NC 27591
DWQ# 04-0584 - Wake
6S*1 ture
? Agent
? Addre ssee
reived by rinted Name) C. Date of De}ivery
D. Is delivery ad ms different from item 17 LJ YA,
If YES, enter elivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
? Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number I 7004 1160 0202 2706 5885
(Transfer from service labeler
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1544
F
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Grover Construction
7324 Siemens Road
Wendell, NC 27591\
DWQ# 04-0584 - Wake
Name)
D. Is delivery address different from Iten'
If YES, enter delivery address below
` ? Agent
? Ad re
Weol!
? No
3. Service Type
IO(Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered q Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number
(rransterfrumservicer 7001 2510 0006 37,67 6036
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt - 102595-02-M-1540
t7
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail
t F Postage & Fees Paid
1 LISPS
g Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
?' ? ?Stlt??l!liil?ilfil!llilltlt?l?ti?l'!?!!!ll?liil! li?l!!!1? !
UPSTREAM END OF OVERFLOW STORM DRAIN N
C v
a~ ^ , 1/3 PIPE ~ ~ U x
B' MAX. a ~ , DAMETER N ~ 00 0 a 0 to to `F- <L r
y V L I NI OAP , ~ 0 ol~(s7 Ov U ~r u
ROP m =OpN i
~~\~G ~ a A A BURY BOTTOM ~ ~ N U OF PLYWOOD ~ _ _ _ _ U (fl
a• P' •.aa•°^~o`. `SfF MIN. 10 GA ~ MIN. 12 1 2 GA. ~ -III-!li-i'i_I11=TI=III=1_I='II ~ II;~~ ,III-illi-II! o -Q p Z ~ I I ~I I._I I I-1 I1-' i l_I I I-I I I_' I I~ I_, a i-III-~ 11-i I ~ ~ m - I LO MIN. 12 1 /2 GA. I ~--1 I I-a I ~-I I ~=1 I i-III-I 11=J I-1 111=1 I I-i I r _
,o•oe p~q LINE WIRES o N IWN1jERMEDIATE IWN1jERMEDIATE 1 p o W = LO+DO °C~ ~ ' ~ ~ i
• `v~~o, voo o• a •o; aka a ,do t7 0 NOTE: ALL PARTIALLY COMPLETED STORM DRS NS 3/4' EXTERIOR PLYWOOD L ~ ~ N DD ^ SHALL BE PROTECTED AT THE END 0
,•oe',o~^o • i0o GRADE •e:.: ~:.o ~ ; oo ~ EACH DAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STEEL FENCE PLYWOOD INLET PROTECTION ~ ~ N o_ ^ r GRADE ~ DEfuLS• POST (TYP.) ~ p ~ ~ CD
UPSTREMI ENO OF TJ' 0 ~ ~ STORM DRAIN ~ _ ~
,moo; •"ems c .o OVERFLOW
NCDOT MS OR g57 WASHED STONE (2 ~
~,P~ EP i ~ 1/3 PIPE C Al I °
5~ FRONT VIEW PLAN VIEW a a ° d ~ DIAMETER ~ . a• a
STEEL POST r WOVEN WIRE FABRIC 5T 0 WIRE FABRIC WASHED STONE FlLTER m ~
SILT FENCE FABRIC iNCE FABRIC ACROSS PIPE INLET ~ ° ~ s ~
W 1=III=~! III a -III= ~ III- , - LA
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT ~ 0 Ll~lll~lll~i!~Il~ilf=-IiI=III- i Hi~il;-1l -lu-ili-II1=iIi=111=1i1-11 11=1! 111_111=1I1.-
A. NCDOT ~/5 OR x{57 WASHED STONE SHALL BE USED. PAD TO BE 50' L X 25' W X B" D MIN. ° 3 FILL SLOPE tt 7 N Z ~ FILL SLOPE ~ HARDWARE CLOTH i
B. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMODATE LARGE TRUCKS IS TO BE PROVIDED. M ~ 0
C. ENTRANCES SHOULD BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM UTILITY BY ALL CONSTRUCTDN VEHICLES. NOTES: n GRADE GRADE •.o STONE FILTER INLET PROTECTION
D. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW - USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA _ r DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN 6" MIN. COVER OVEI OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOPDRESSING MAY BE NECESSARY. AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW 6" MIN. COVER OVER SKIRT
N E. TEMPORARY PADS MUST BE LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF ADJOINING ROADWAY. FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE ANCHOR SKIRT AS FOR SKIRT AS 6" GRAVEL FILTER
FAILURES, USE N0. 57 DIRECTED BY ENGINEER WASHED STONE CTED BY ENGINEER R F T R FA RI PIPE INLET PROTECTION PLYWOOD AND STONE
FRONT VIEW 0 L E B C
SECTION A-A
STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAIL ETAI L NOTES: CONCRETE BLOCK
1. LA IS THE LENGTH OF THE RIPRAP APRON.
DEWATERING 2. THE DOWNSTREAM WIDTH OF THE APRON IS EQUAL TO Do+LA
3. INSTALL AMOCO 2006 FILTER FABRIC UNDERLINER OR EQUAL o 00 BETWEEN THE RIPRAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION. ~ ~ ~ o
~
4. IN A WELL DEFINED CHANNEL EXTEND THE APRON UP THE ~ ~ ~ _ °
W=Pipe Dia + La D=1.5X1.5 X ~0 La = L CHANNEL BANKS TO AN ELEVATION OF 6" ABOVE THE MAXIMUM _ o~ ~ TAI WA r L TER DEPTH OR TO THE TOP OF THE BANK, WHICHEVER IS
PIPE PIPE LEVEL SPREADER cfs FES VEL f s DISSIPATOR D50 in. Q P LESS. ~ ° ° o °
SLOPE ~ SIZE In. CALC AND SIZE L W D CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ~
~ n, ° -L- ° °
2.04 3A 0.5 15 3.7212 TEMP 8' X 10' X 6.75" 3 2.04 X 13 = 27 LIN. FEET 1. LAY ONE BLOCK ON EACH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE yy~~~ ° ~.J c n°~ ON I1S SIDE ON THE BOTTOM ROW TO ALLOW POOL ~ ~o ~ooopa o~oooa`~
9 8F 0.5 24 5.0905 TEMP 9' X 11' X 7.875" 3.5 9 X 13 = 117 LIN. FEET DRAINAGE. THE FOUNDATION SHOULD BE EXCAVATED AT LEAST 2 INCH BELOW THE CREST OF THE STORM / ( n l
3.656 9A 0.5 15 3.7212 TEMP 8' X 10' X 6.75" 3.8 X 13 = 50 LIN. FEET 3 OUTLET N0. Do LA W T MATERIAL T~11E EDGE of THE S~ORM DRaN ~OR~LATELRAL SUP ORT _ v J If , I ~
4.654 22C 0.5 18 4.2021 TEMP 9' X 11' X 7.87" 3.5 4.65 X 13 = 60 LIN. FEET FES 7 36" 22' 25' 18' CLASS 1 STONE AND TO AVOID WASHOUTS WHEN OVERFLOW OCCURS. 2:1 SLOPE, GRAVEL FlLTER L1J „ IF NEEDED, GNE LATERAL SUPPORT TO SUBSEQUENT z
FES #7B 54 35 40' 18 CLASS 1 STONE ROWS BY PLACING 2z4 WOOD STUDS THROUGH W BLOCK OPENINGS. FES #10 15 12' 14' 18" CLASS 1 STONE WIRE SCREEN = O
6.184 23E 0.5 18 4.2021 TEMP 9' X 11' X 7.875" 3.5 6.18 X 13 = 80 LIN. FEET FES #12 15" 10' 12' 18" CLASS 1 STONE 2. CAREFULLY FlT HARDWARE CLOTH OR COMPARABLE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
2.58 26B 0,5 15 3.7212 TEMP 8' X 11' X 6.75" 3 2.58 X 13 = 40 LIN. FEET WIRE MESH WITH 1/2-INCH OPENING OVER ALL p ~ U FES #18 2-66" 20 28' 18" CLASS 1 STONE BLOCK OPENING TO HOLD GRAVEL IN PLACE. OOL
4.845 28B 0.5 18 4.2021 TEMP 9' X 12' X 7.875" 3.5 4.9 X 13 = 64 IN. F FES #196 48" 22' 26' 18" CLASS 1 STONE DEWATERING m 3. USE CLEAN GRAVE 3 4-TO 1 2-INCH IN W L-L~ FES 26 2-24" 26' 30' 18" CLASS 1 STONE / / ~
L EET DIAMETER, PLACED 2 INCHES BELOW THE TOP FES x!30 48" 26' 30' 18" CLASS 1 STONE OF THE BLACK ON A 2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER AND 1'MIN 16 ~ Q
7.86 25F 0.5 24 5.0905 TEMP 13 X 15 X 11.25 5 7.86 X 13 = 102 LIN. FEET SMOOTH IT TO AN EVEN GRADE. DOT X67 WASHED Q STONE IS RECOMMENDED. 2'~•
8.13 24D 0.5 24 5.0905 TEMP 9' X 11 X 7.875" 3.5 8.13 X 13 = 105 LIN. FEET =I I i-1 I F~ (n -=I-- V / =i i t=1 I I_I I I-I I~=1 I I-I I_ w
3.825 10B 0.5 15 3.7212 3 X 1 = 0 LIN. T .7 • 111 III II-III-111,-~II,~~lllil!~il!~~~ ° ° - ~ ~
SEDIMENT 1 j ,1111 , I I ~ -
-L W I- W w =
~o z
Q~ z ~
I BLOCK AND GRAVEL DROP INLET PROTECTION - = f- o
~ z NTS i
0
Uw 1
2. ww
MIN. z LL
U %!i•'r~ r iB 0
~I
FROM TO DRAINAGE MANNING RUNOFF CA SUM k TO TOTAL Tc RAINFALL RUNOFF CONTRIB. TOTAL PIPE PIPE FLOW INLET STEEP CUT OR FILL SLOPE / r~, 0
AREA A ROUGH N COEFF. COEFF, (acres) CA STA. TO STA. INTENSITY (cfs) INFLOW FLOW DIA, SLOPE VELOCITY TYPE u;~ ~ Q
(acres) (n) (C) (acres) (mm.) (mm.) (m,/hr.) (cfs) (cfs) (In) ft/ft) ftJs ( ( ) I 1 I W ~
TI W CROSS SEC ON
CB#2 CB#3 0.27 0.013 0.85 0.2295 0.2295 5 5 7.5 1.7212 3.2 4.921 15 0.01 5.2625 51NGLE
CB#3 FES#3A 0.05 0.013 0,85 0.0425 0.272 5 5 7.5 2.04 0 2,04 15 0.005 3.7212 FES z POSITIVE GRADE 1,OX MA%. ~ I I
UPSLOPE TOE ~ ~ N w
FES#7A FES#7B 36 0.013 0.6 21.6 21.6 5 5 8.5 183.6 0 183. 60 0.005 9.3767 SINGLE SIDE SLOPES ~~~1~~~~~~~
2:1 (MAX.)
DESIGN CRITERIA: 1. DESIGN FOR 10 YEAR STORM UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\~A ~A
CB#8 CB#SA 0.35 0.013 0.8 0.28 0.28 5 5 7.5 2.1 0 2.1 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5 MIN. AT EACH ~ ~ ~ \
CB#8A CB#8B 0.3 0.013 0.8 0.24 0.52 5 5 7.5 3,9 0 3,9 15 0.005 3,7212 SINGLE ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ \ INLET. \ \ \V~ \ ~ ~ ~ A
CB#8B CB#8C 0.25 0.013 0.8 0.2 0.72 5 5 7.5 5.4 0 5.4 18 0,005 4.2021 SINGLE 3. MANNINGS n FACTOR= 0.013.
CB#8C CB#8D 0.2 0.013 0.8 0.16 0.88 5 5 7.5 6.6 0 6.6 18 0.005 4.2021 SINGLE 4. INTENSITY= /(h+T) WHERE =195 AND h=22 AS DERIVED 9 9
FROM THE RALEIGH INTENSITY-DURATION-FREQUENCY STEEP CUT OR FlLL SLOPE W
CB#8D CB#8E 0.2 0.0 13 0.8 0, 16 1.04 5 5 7.5 7.8 0 7.8 I S 0.0 I 5.9427 SINGLE H W C ARTS.
CB#8E FES#SF 0.2 0.0 13 0.8 0.16 1, 2 5 5 7.5 9 0 9 24 0.005 5.0905 FES 5. ALL YARD INLET TOPS ARE AT RIM ALL CATCH BASIN PLAN VIEW = TOPS ARE AT TOP OF CURB.
CB#9 FES#9A 0.65 0.013 0.75 0.4875 0.4875 5 5 7.5 3.656 0 3.656 15 0.005 3,7212 SINGLE * DESIGN FOR THE 25 YEAR STORM.
CB#22A CB#22B 0.31 0.013 0.85 0.2635 0.2635 5 5 7.5 1.9763 0 1.97 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE
DIVERSION DITCH DETAIL
CB#22B FES#22C 0.42 0.013 0.85 0.357 0.6205 5 5 7.5 4.6538 0 4.653 I S 0.005 4.2021 FES
CB#23A CB#23B 0.25 0.013 0.85 0.2125 0.2125 5 5 7.5 1.594 0 1.594 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE ~ ali,
CB#23B CB#23C 0.22 0.013 0.85 0.187 0.3995 5 ' 5 7.5 2.996 0 2.996 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 3 3 0
~1 I 1
CB#23C CB#23D 0.2 0.013 0.85 0.17 0.5695 5 5 7.5 4.271 0 4.271 f 5 0.005 3.72 12 SINGLE ,1~L GRASS LINING WITH =
CB#23D FE5#23E 0.3 0.013 0.85 0.255 0,8245 5 5 7.5 6.184 0 6.184 I S 0.005 4.2021 FES TEMPORARY STRAW 2'-0"
NETTING S75/0 BY
CB#24A CB#24 0.2 0,013 0.85 0.17 0.17 5 5 7.5 1.275 0 I ,275 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE NORTH AMERICAN
CB#24 CB# I OA 0.15 0.013 0.85 0.127 0.2975 5 5 7.5 2.231 0 2.231 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE GREEN OR EQUAL
A 1' ANCHOR FABRIC F MIN, DITCH SECTION 1 PER MANUFACTURER'S
CB# I OA FES# I OB 0.25 0.0 13 0.85 0.2 125 0.5 I 5 5 7.5 3.825 0 3.82 15 0.005 3.72 12 SINGLE CARRY RIP-RAP UP 2~ MIN, SIDES OF SPILLWAY N.T,S. SPECIFICATIONS
TOP OF BERM ~ ~~~~i
CB#24A CB#24B 0.55 0.013 0.75 0.412 0.4125 5 5 7.5 3.094 0 3.094 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE ~5 WASHED STONE ^J('~ 1' FREEBOARD MIN. 3 3 ~G i
CB#24B CB#24C 0.35 0.013 0.85 0.297 0.71 5 5 7.5 5.325 0 5.32 18 0,005 4.2021 SINGLE TOP ELEVATION OF STORMWATER ~ ( ~
r n.ooD sroRACE I , ~ ; - (MAX.) ~ C~~~,~-~
CB#24C FES#24D 0.44 0.013 0.85 0.374 1.084 5 5 7.5 8.13 0 8.13 24 0.005 5.0905 SINGLE 'QO 1 ~.r~l
SEDIMENT STORAGE DEPTH (TOTAL BASIN CAPACITY) 1 3' MIN. GLASS A STONE ~ v4~ 4~vG ~ i~~,
CB#25A CB#25B 0.68 0.013 0,6 0.408 0.408 5 5 7.5 3.06 0 3.06 15 0.005 3.7212 51NGLE ' D50 - 6 AMOCO 2006 ' - 18" THICK ~
2 -0 FABRIC UNDERLINING i
CB#25B CB#25C 0.25 0.013 0.8 0.2 0.608 5 5 7.5 4.56 0 4,56 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE to RIP-RAP OR EQUAL
CB#25C CB#25D 0.15 0.013 0.8 0.12 0.728 5 5 7.5 5.46 0 5.46 18 0.005 4.2021 SINGLE DTTDM B~ MIN. DITCH SECTION 2 LENGTH r ANCHOR FABRIC
CB#25D CB#25E 0.15 0,013 0.8 0.12 0.848 5 5 7.5 6.36 0 6.36 I8 0.005 4.2021 51NGLE L MIN. N.T.S. PER MANUFACTURER'S
A SPECIFICATIONS
CB#25E FES#25F 0.25 0.013 0.8 0.2 1.048 5 5 7.5 7.86 0 7.86 24 0.005 5.0905 FES MA%IMUM LEVEL Of SEDIMENT COLLECTED --L ~~~h
CLEAN BASIN WHEN 7HIS LEVEL IS REACHED 3 O 3 4
CB#26A FES#26B 0.43 0.013 0.8 0.344 0.344 5 5 7.5 2.58 0 2.58 15 0.005 3.7212 FES .
G v~ v Q ~
SECTION THRU BASIN & FILTER ~ i ~ ~.Y) ~ O ~ r `'r , /1 ` G~,.~' W ~ CO
EXCB EXCB 0.18 0.013 0.85 0, 153 0.153 5 5 7.5 1.148 0 1.148 15 0.005 3.72 12 SINGLE CLASS A STONE ~ ,r ~ ~ ~j, r N ~ _ k, ~ ~ rn
° EXCB EXCB 0.18 0.013 0.85 0.153 0.306 5 5 7.5 2.295 0 2.295 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 0 N CARRY RIP-RAP UP D 50 - 6 AMOCO 2006 p U SIDES OF SPILLWAY 3 18 THICK ~ z z
N EXCB EXCB#28 0.1 0.013 0.85 0.085 0.391 5 5 7.5 2.9325 0 2.93 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE ° 4 0 FABRIC UNDERLINING w 11)
C0 EXCB#28 CB#28A 0.1 0.013 0.85 0.085 0.476 5 5 7.5 3.57 0 3.57 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE Q OR EQUAL ~ ~ • ~ \~I I ~ 1' ~ W J ~
CB#28A FE5#28B 0.2 0.013 0.85 0.17 0.646 5 5 7.5 4.845 0 4.845 I S 0.005 4.2021 FES f W DITCH SECTION 3 I WEIR LENGTH ~'1 RIP-RAP ~ AN H R FA R ~ ~ w SEDIMENT N.T.S. C O B G W Q~
PIT 3' PER MANUFACTURER'S ~ z
N ~7 i N W ~ 1' MIN. FREEBOARD / ~ I I 1 I l SPECIFICATIONS f~
CB# 130 CB# 13 I 0.62 0.013 0.65 0.403 1.262 5 5 7.5 9.465 4.47 13.94 24 0.005 5.0905 SINGLE 0 / EARTH BERM ~ > ~ II ~ II.
CB# 13 I CB# 132 0.28 0.0 13 0.7 0.196 1.458 5 5 7.5 10.935 6.27 17.2 130 0.005 5.9070 SINGLE L i I ,~li, IIII ~ - A 3 3 ~ G i
CB# 132 CB# 133 0.25 0.0 13 0.8 0.2 1.658 5 5 7.5 12.435 6.27 18.7 I 30 0.005 5.9070 SINGLE 0 ~ -~1 1
~ ~ _ _ Ip5 WASHED STONE ~G ^~4 N G ~ ~ PERSPECTIVE VIEW ~ ~G ' ~
CB# 133 CB# 134 0. I 0.0 13 0.8 0.08 1.738 5 5 7.5 13.035 6.27 19.3 I 30 0.005 5.9070 SINGLE ' ~j~~
CB# 134 FES# 135 0.17 0.0 13 0.8 0.136 1.874 5 5 7.5 14.055 7.995 22.05 30 0.005 5.9070 SINGLE 0 m - - CLASS 2 RIP-RAP J ~G ~ ~'G ` G ~G w
0 D50=15 ~ „ AMOCO 2006
° CB# 129A CB# 129 0.22 0.0 13 0.8 0.176 0.176 5 5 7.5 1.32 0 1.32 15 0.005 3.72 12 51NGLE N SECTION A-A THRU BERM & FILTER 42 THICK 5'-O" FABRIC UNDERLINING PRAWN
ti OR EQUAL CMK
OJ L DITCH SECTION 4 CHECKED
' CB# 131 A CB# 131 0.3 0.0 13 0.8 0.24 0.24 5 5 7.5 1.8 0 1.8 15 0.005 3.72 12 51NGLE ° N.T.S. DJV
m APPROVED
° YI# ! 30A CB# 130 0.6 0.0 13 0.7 0.42 0.42 5 5 7.5 3.15 0 3.15 15 0.005 3.72 12 Y INLET GMM START DATE
L a 4/99
REVIEW BY TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOB CODE I
° CB# 134B CB# 134A 0.2 0.0 13 0.75 0.15 0.15 5 5 7.5 I.125 0 I.125 15 0.005 3.72 12 SINGLE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL Pc9a46o~a
° CB# 134A CB# 134 0. I 0,0 13 0.8 0.08 0.23 5 5 7.5 I ,725 0 1.725 15 0.005 3.72 12 SINGLE NTS This design has been reviewed for the Town of Knightdale by the
undersigned consulting engineer of the Town of Knightdale, and to the DRAWING
° ` FESRW- I CBRW-2 1.25 0.0 13 0.75 0.9375 0.9375 5 5 7.5 7.03 I 0 7.031 18 0.005 4.202 I FE5 E best of my knowledge and belief, it conforms to the requirements No. established in the Standard Specifications of the Town of Knightdale.
w CBRW-2 CBRW-3 0.15 0.013 0.8 0.12 1.0575 5 5 7.5 7.931 0 7.931 24 0.005 5.0905 SINGLE L 3 CBRW-3 FESRW-4 0.5 0.013 0.8 0.4 I ,4575 5 5 7.5 10.93 I 0 10.931 24 0.005 5.0905 SINGLE By: Date: -
° °
T
P:\4601A-EMERA~D3\DWG\D-3.DWG
0

I

J - - ~ x
i ~ i~ ~ I 1 'I ~ (Z v N w ~ i
f / _ 1 \ O a~ i ~ ~ a~ rn C
i r I ~ ~V '~i C In ~
i ~ d ~
v ~ l % ' NSW DR F~RMER~Y I ~ ~ _ - ~ ~ I U A ~ c ~ r
; ~ \ i ~ ~ 0
RTY ~ ~ C~ZART PROPE i ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 rn
~ , Q - - i 1 L rn~ i ~ _ Q m \ r ~ ~ I ~
4 1551 93 7 50 , PIN 1 5 I ow aFF ~ - Na ~ _ 4 O~ L , ~ ~ i
~ 1858 - E- 83 , SY, - _ _ ' , . ~..J. ~ ~ j i N t~ % 1 ~ rn
! i~ ~ i i ~ ' 1 ~ i ~ C d' i l / y / I ~ i 1~ , 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ',J' , L ~
~ HW E - 27.0 4 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 S ~ ~ / ~---1 , ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ C P~ ~ 1 , 1_.' _i..C W
~ a ~ 1 8 36 0 87 , S - _ ~ 90 89 gg i. ~ ~ ~ ~ -
1 X ` INV 1N=29 4 N=29 4 87 , ~ ,
/ ~ ~ , ~x / yi ~ ~ INV OUJ-2 .9 ~ > > ~ OUZ=2 ~ .9 - `C.B.#8C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
; ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ 91 YP F 01 92, C.B.#8A '1 01,0 TOP ~~02.25 FIRE HYD. SILT ~ ~ ~A INV IN=297.81 ASSY, (TYP.) ~ ~ ; < ~
' ! ~ ~ ~ 95 94 ~ 93 ~ T P=302,25 ~ ~ 0 FENCE ~ ~ ~ .25 INV OUT=297.7 , FIRE HYD, ,
it ~ ~ 96 - ~ ~ ~ ~ 97 Q 7 ~ INV IN=298.43 101 100 9~'~ 98 ~ ~ N T=296,3 .98.43 SY, YPJ 85 - ~ ' ~ ~ ;ar ~ =296,3 38 LF 18 P , ~ ~ n ' ~I , ~
I C~ , ~ q 1 T~A~ (OLD TR ®0.5
I ~'G I103 ip2 ~ I I DIVERSI TRAP 1 ~ Q 5, #7 ~ .B. BD ~ > i ~ TO =303.00 ~ DIVERS~O ~ ~ ~ ~
I , 1 DITCH (YP. ~ IN .37' L~' 1 " P I CLEARIN ~ 5 WATER', SE ICE T 327.67 MEN ~V ~ P IN IN=297.52 88 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ i~ _ DIT TYP. , ~ ~ w
i LIMITS ( = FIRE HYD, EASE T ( O ~ ~ INV T 323. Y, (YPJ ~ _OUT-296.52 ~ ~ _ ; ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ V 27 LF ~8°_ P S4 1 ~ ~
i ~ FIRE HYDE $ - ~ ~ ~ ~
' ATER SE CE ASS , (TY > 2 L. 5 R ~ .50 - 5 ~ ~ A MENT ( ~ ~ w E ra ~ ~ ~ I w _ ~ S• a ~ I o ~ i
~ ~ i F ~ ~ W N „ q o ~ ~R ~
- ~ p . Cp - ~ - " J ~ 8.. SS o 9 FHS ~ ~ ~ tD0 r R / '
~ o ~ ~ 5 " F.E: o ~ F.E: ~C FIRE HY~1r ~ W ~ ~ F ~ ASSY, ~ ~ ~
w p !I ~ S o ~
I g 4 - - c z. - } 1 T N ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 83%~ ~ + V ~ ~ i ~
1 C.B N / _ tJ! i 1
- ~ TO 32 57 " " t' - D 5~ WATER SERVICE ~ ~ - 1 CLASS 1 - o N i I _ _ ~ o y ( ` GENERAL NOTES EROSION CONTROL
RIP RA APRON - np, C.8.~2 I -322.91 , - L=3~~ TO 2 6.64 EASEfvIEN ( ) _ _ 24g =2 REPLA WITH ~j TOP 327.67 NV UT-322.81 2 gg W=4d' 1, ~ ~ v 8
I 47 j 246 IN 332.7 pRl1P0 D CB DIVERSION i INV IN=323.6 ~ 191 ~ 1 C.B. J-2 \ ~'FES 2~' 1. ALL ~QNSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS C.B. E N ' b ~I ~ \ AND THEE GRADING PERMIT ISSUED BY WAKE COUNTY FOR THIS PROJECT. NV'9. . ~ I
i INV O T=332.6 248 ~ I T E 'INV 1013T 32 .56 I , 0 , I DITCH (TYP.) ~ ~ INV' =296. ~ I i rl _ ~p 6.17 ® 4" ~ 9D -296. 0, 'I
~ 194 ~ ~ ~ ~ I -OUT= 6. 196 195 " ~ ~I r' 'N l -OUT= 6. ~ S~ R ~ ~ 82 ~ ~ 2.~~~FkiE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE \ ~ ~ SILT ' FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO LAND
~ 199 198 , I I I 197 192 ~ 8 5 I i / j 5 , ~ ' , s ~ z 8 SILT FEI~~ FENCE' z ~ DIST ANCE ACTIVITY 80TH ON AND OFF SITE. ~ ~ ~@ _
~ FIRE g?~RSION ~ ~ ~ C.B. ~ ~ ~
~ I ® / a ~ / ~ V ~ V ~ _ ~[~jT(~ T ~ ~ 1 3, TOTAL DENUDED AREA ON SITE = 9.50 AC . _ ~ ~ T -30 ~ ~ i ~ z
~ ~ ING / / i V=297.3 ~ TE 10
j' 'IJMI TYP. x _ Ln , ~ Q ,DA-a.s Ac. EASEMENT _ ~ \ ~ ~ WER ~ ~ - ~
~ , / - 257 S' ~ ~ A z 257 ~ ~ 81
~ ~ % ~ ~ ~ 256 r ~k 9 \ 71 ~9 \ _ ~ ` ~ \ Q - 0
/
FES ~l3A ; ~ 0 NA 4 a,
\ / NV OUT=322.00 SPREADER i i rn~y-~ S o~~n ~i \ W W ~ ~ PRfgD \ er ~ ~ ~ ~i ~
I _ ~ LEVE READ ~ CE FI E HYH~, A ER ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s S ~ \ ~ ASS , (TYP,) N I
!r A: 271+11,2339 TAIL DITCH TO Z~ FIRE HYD. SE¢N AS DAYLIGHT AND LEVEE' / 5~~ ~ A Y. (TYP.) o Q~ Ry i ~ ~ ; z H 291.7 rn ~ ~ ~ j
"s s. SPREADER ~ F OQ~ 5 EN M , V / ' ~o i - O ~ ~ t A I
TA: 70+00.0000 s ~ 254' ~ ~z - ~ c S ~ - U ~ 1 L 0 l ~
S / i 6 G~ ~ / - 253 ® i ~ i ~ ~ cps ~ I-I , _ W
~ ~ !D.1 6 C ~ ~ z A ~ r.-- ~ , ;
f ZS 'p~ i ,i i ~ ~ - i .B.{~22B, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ \/l ~ ' 1 - l ~ l ( ~ i Q -
~ ~ 0 P= 5.06 ` ~ ~ ~ 0 252 ry 1 n\ ~ i i I i
i . 2 5 ~ IN=319.21 IN OUT=3 9~'1~ ~ ~ > X00' STR + i ~ o, ~ ~ BUFFER ' I ~
s - =1 X w r~ ~ 0. ~ N < 0 1- \ o A 20 SA ~ I ~ ~ 1'U A NI ~ , i
r o, ~ ' - ti ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ I x DER ~ i ~ ~ W ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ Q ~ o ~a3-~ ~ ~ ~ W 261 ~ ~ o \ ~ 4 W
~ ~ 1 ~ 251 ~ N 261 -l ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ X ~ p
0 i 0 ~ FIRE HY , ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ o o ~ x ~ yo ti C.B.#2~ 24 ~ : I ~ L1~ U
/ - Y. (TYP, Q ~ ASS ~ . 2 A s ; 0 250 ~ ~ 0 ~ ii TO 30 6,~2 gp ~r ~ INV IN=303. ~ ~ A,
G , P=324.99 ~k % ~ / 00 VOUT=319,35 INV OUT=303.1 .B. 24C ~ ~ (n i~ ~ _ i ~ LL
~ ~k ~ ~t - ` ~ , 25L "RCP 266 I - • 3 ~ ~ _ ~ Q 11 ! ~
/ ~ ~ 190 273 y / ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 0 % \ X302.73 2 IDiVE L' ~ I 1", N W
24A,--~' ~~NCE ToP= P ~ l ~ Y• ~ 2 CP INV IN=300. - ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ / DI`II~SION i k ~ / > ~ TO -308.00 • •~2 C.8.~25C H ~ ~ ~ i W 262 IN 0 - TOP=30 . 0 TOP=~ 5.19 INV OUT=30 ,40 AS p,) ~ ! ~ L.L.J
DITCH (TYP. -~--Les o . INV IN=30 _ / ~ ~ ~ ~ INV IN- 1.26 l~ ' i
~ ~ 4 ~O. ~ / ~ ~ ri u T=3b . 0 INV OUT= 01.16 ILA ~ ` i ~ ~ i 264 FI ~ 35LF 1 RCP ENCE ~ ~ W
, O ~ o~ ING 1 .B.25A ~ ~ ~ SY, ~ 1.88 % ~ 1
~ C.6 i ~ / ,OMITS (TYP. ~ , C,~ P=305.~3~ ~ ~ I ~ - , ~ 269 i' C~ 11.32 I VOUT-302.27 ~ ~
~ / ~ 318 i ~ i ~ 3 ~ 275 / ~ V V IN=306.26 ~ J ~
l I, . ~ ~ / ~ ~ wu ni~T_zna,a C_B.3C 35LF 5 RCPnT ~ ~1+ ~ ~ ~ ten' 1 '_1
mr 11 it m r vv i wv. i v UI'=JU / / / ®V. 7a ' L C.IVU'
i~ i 'I ~ ~ ~ - E 6~ ' ~ E-- 263 I V IN-302.83 RAC ~ ~ r E ~ VOUT=302.73 .~R 5 ~ * 178 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ % S ~ ~ P ~ ~ • NOUI ER FORMERLY w ~ i , I-
~ FES % ~ ~ k ERS 5~ Y " I ~ 5 MEN o 1185 11 V, J s l 1 40LF 15, CP ~ ~ ~ ,
1 00 ~ ~~17 '27LF 15 RCP 35' LT ~ P 6 ~ ~ 276 ®0.50% 0 ~ ~ P P f w ® a. z% JAMES ',FOWLER ~G E ~ I ~ z
1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ 4 ~ / 1 o ~ ~ ~ DB 391 PAGE X99 _ , o ~ . cn
~ ~ ~ ~ \ 2 3 ~ ~:8:~231~ ~ ` \ ~ ~ / ~i ~ TOP=3 ~ ~ ~ \ 321 I ~ _
~ _ 1 r'~ % ~ - ~ ~ ~ I T-306.39 r ~ P N 1 65,03-12 X617 I 6 TOP 0 .3 + ~ LEVEI'; SPREADER
~ J 5~, INV IN= 0.13 ~ ~ w
~ ~ \ ~ j J 68LF 15" RCP DIVERSION ®0.50 J 4 R P ~ / INV OUT 00. / ~ 111LF 2 C .~26A ~ 77 1 , / ~ / N =295.`,0
_ 244 277 ~ 2 ITCH TYP. i ( ~ 316 k DIVE SIGN =3 SION
~ S :106+8 .1452 YI 1 ~ / i ~ 3 2 320 N ~ E ~oDITC {TYpp ~ (TYP, 32
~ OF T: 0.,0000 L o ~ 1 \ ~ 1 T - ~ INV IN=302.39 FES.~25E ~ S~
CB \ FES RSION \ ~ D V,E 324 ~ V T 99. ~ INV OUT 302.29 IN OU ~1 ~ ~ M - m/cn r 5 F 1" RCPT \ \
~ 242 OUT = 3 .10 ~ ~ v ~ , CH (TYP.) p, TAIL DI z~ ~ ~ k 23LF 18 RL`P ~
~ 278 ~ \ ~ ~ FIR FIR H / ~ 325 TO LEVEL \
/ ~ B• 21 L VE SPREADER H \ i / # A~' FES.~23E ~ FES.# 6B A~' ~ OUT= 9 .
OP-313.60 / ~ / INV IN=306.36 NV OUT=302.18 VEL SPREAD R
~ I / ~ ?~41 INV OUT=306.26 k 319 5 ~ ~ O '
I U+ \ ~ j ~ 76 i m i ~ 1 1 7 0 ~ ~
\ / 32 ~.F.-15 RCP o ~ EV. 301 ~ / A X17 ~ \ i _ FIR Y I o
~ 1 ~ ~ q \ 241LF RCP®1X LASS "1" AC- k 00 ; , F #10B A SY, ( ~ ~ ,
j _ AC- IN OUT 3~a.94 268 I ! N \ I ~ ~ ~ OLD 1RA
' 14 ; L-22 ,,,-'6+00 \ # Y~2 i \ 1~ \ i 7+ r ~ ~ dx ~ , 7 ; / TRAP 23 - oo ~ _ IT ~ ~ ~
\ ¢ C.B.#19 F.E.S #1 / ADER ~ I ~ ~
FE 6 ~ 1 TOP=306.0 INV 3 M \ ~ P M N 20 UTILITY , ~ ~ _ ~
\ \ 1 ; INV=306c60 ~ ~ / L.F.- CP TYP SILT ® B ( ) 1,
8 L L SPREA R TOP ; ~ ~ ~ V~~, A~~~. ~ /40 LF.~36"RCP ,86~' ~ s ~ 2 :A R TOp x ~ENCE ~
~ ~ ~ I ILT INV , T ~ 1 INV : - ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE WEIR
A\ ~ ~ F .S. #1 ES.# cc~~ 314 iN OUT = ~61~ 330 ~ 1 TRAP TYP 314 A \ AREA DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH LENGTH E
~ ~ ~ i V=3 , ~ ~ , 279 TRA ~ 20 ~ V ~ i ~ ~ \ 3 166 0 13LF 'h RCP x~ _ - ~ 1 0.73 AC 4 10 STANDARD TRA X20 0 0.5 - ` i , _ 5 12 2
~ , ~ ~ P®~It9:~ T ~ 60LF 15 RCP' F ~ 2 0.98 AC 5 14 26 10 STANDARD 0 ST~ q
~ INW EL = 8. 0 7.43% ~ ~ ~ / B ,243 < B FF ~ 3 0.83 AC 0 T ARD _ 00 - - _ ~g0.50 5 13 26 1 SAND
~ ~ ~ /C ~ - 6.84 - 8 - tN-~ EX- 4 INV T= ~ 4 0.28 AC 5 8 16 10 STANDARD
~ ~ ~ CB 2a ~ ~ i - ~ I ~ TOP ~ 07.00 '`p V OU 4 \ ~ O 5 0.43 AC 5 9 18 10 STANDARD
I - - 3 1 \ ~ 1 P= 1 t^ cA I - 303.46 ~ r~ PRw~TE _ - ~N o ~ 20 D4ALNAGE 15 F 18 P \
~ i ~ l i ~ ~ •P i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 0 ± ~ INV 1N ~ ~ , NV 0 1 ~ . ~ 50 a T=2 6. ~ 6 0,16 AC 5 6 12 10 STANDARD EASEMtN ~ INV U + ~ ~
i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ # ~ ~ _ TRAP ~k3 u~,1 I ' -'--~T~'p) ~ 7 .86 AC 13 26 STANDARD 0 5 10 - - o .y\~
4 ' ~ ~ ' t ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 I / ~ g p - ~ 39 cr, ~ ~ - , t ~ p i p 1 7 0 , 8 1.32 AC 5 16 32 10 CUSTOM I - _ ~ 1 EAB~}~ -
/ ! ~ ~ ~ j i~~, ~ ~ 1 J 9 0,63 AC 5 11 22 10 STANDARD \ ~ TRAP ~F4
- ~ 1 ' ,¢RivATE / SILT t< i - ~ ~ 10 0.44 AC ~ ~ ~ 5 9 19 10 STANDARD I~ ~ 42+ f 1 Q ~
ce ~s ~ 20' DPq~Nac~~ ~ ~ ~ FENCE ~ 3 ~ I ~1 ~ A M N T / _ ~ I' ~ , ii ~ 1~ ` 11 0.88 AC 5 13 26 10 STANDARD ~ ~ ~ ~p
#3~ _ ~ ~g , , ~ ~ / E SE E ~ , ~ i, i I a ~ _ - -
r" ~ ~ j ~ (TYF~~ 1~ lI ~ ~ / ~ ~ i~ .gyp A ' ~ ! ILT ` 12 1.a7 AC 5 19 38 10 CUSTOM w N r v S ~ rn
1 1, i ~ y ' ' ~ 1 ~ ' I ~ I`~I FX~£:8:~0 ~ ~ i~ - _ I ~ FENC ~ 13 0.26 AC 5 7 14 10 STANDARD O Z U I
11 / 11 ~ ~I ~ 1 ~ FES 2 0 ~ - EX-C.. TOP ~ 295.6 + ~ CO W Z ~ / I EX-C.B L 14 0,99 AC 5 14 28 10 ~ I ~ A 1 10 ~ STANDARD ~ ~ ,i CON IS > 1 J
i , I 19+06 'p ~ III , ~ I ~ I ~ i I ~i ~ ~ I ~ ~ 5 o.t7 AC 5 6 12 10 STANDARD ~ W J 1 8"}~~ / ~ ON BOX , <
1, ~ / ~ ~ ~I , 1 I ~ Q ~ I~ I~ ~ ~ ~ I i~ y ~ n I' ~ ' ~ 1` XIST INV' = 2 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U) W . i I ~ / ~ ~ _ 16 0.69 AC 5 12 24 10 STANDARD W p ~
- ° ~ - ~ ~ ~ i - %I ~ ~ I ~ ~~~.1. it I i ~ II i ~ ~ ,I~ ~ ~RivATE DRAINAGE . ~ NEW INV OUT-2 .16~ , r- d' ~ ' ~r ~I ~ ~ 17 0,48 AC 10 AR ~ z ~ ~ ! ~ I I _ - f- E~S"~Erd7 (T~, i I PDBUC A ~ l ~ , ~r ~ 5 10 20 STAND D N
~ I ~ ~ ~I i~~i~ ~ i I' ~ i ~a l l~ I ~ . n ~ i ~ I ~ w I ~ a- ~I ~ n 1, , ~ ~ 18 1.82 Ac 5 19 38 10 CUSTOM ~ ~
S,~EDING SCHEDULE -
SEEDBED PREPARATION m ~ 19 0,17 AC 5 6 12 10 STANDARD PERMAHEtir semlNC - ~ 20 0.97 AC 5 14 28 10 STANDARD
0 1. CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL 3 INCHES DE P SHOUT DFRS. SIDE DRGHES_, SLOPES (MAYMAv. 3:1 _
ADVERSE SOIL CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE. N ~ 21 0.42 AC 5 9 19 10 STANDARD TYPE PLANTING RATE CONSTRUCTION SE UENCE
0 2, RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO 6 INCH AuG t~ NOTES KEYED TO PLAN 3. REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING NoV. 1 - TALL FESCUE 200 LBS. CRE 22 1'29 AC 5 16 32 10 CUSTOM AUG. 1~ NOV, t / 1. 08TAIN GRADING PERMIT. Nov. 1 - MAR.1 TALL FESCUE R ROP 260195 ACRE 2. INSTALL GRAVEL ENTRANCE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, SILT FENCING, 23 0,38 AC 5 9 18 10 STANDARD U
L SURFACE REASONABLY SMOOTH ANO UNIFORM. MAR.t- MAR. 1 -APR. 15 TALL~FESCBUEUZZI RYE (NU SEC ) 400 LBS./ CRE IM NT TRAPS OR OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED APR. 1t~ JUN. 30 HULLED COMMON eERMUDAGRASS 15 LBS.~CRE SED E ~ 24 0.84 AC 5 13 26 1 D STANDARD
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, SEE DETAIL SHEET APR' t',~ m 4. APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SUPERPHOSPHATE PLAN. DRAWN
UNIFORMILY AND MIX WITH SOIL (SEE BELOW*). ~ 2 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL 3. CALL 856-6196 FOR ON-SITE INSPECTION BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. 25 0.22 AC 5 7 14 10 STANDARD PERMANENT SEEDING - TO OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, ONCE OBTAINED BEGIN CLEARING ECKED
a SHEET Q_3~ 5. CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL AWELL-PULVERIZED, FIRM, REASONABLY SLOPES TO 2:1) AND GRUBBING.
UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 TO 6 INCHES DEEP. ° 3 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, SEE AuG. tb-~ AUG. 16-NOV.1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS/ACRE 4. MAINTAIN DEVICES AS NEDDED. ROUGH GRADE SITE.
m DETAIL SHEET 0-3 6. SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER LIGHTLY WITH ~ SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING. NoV. t-~, AND SERICEA LESPEDEZA (UNHULLED, UNSCARIFIED) 60 TO 7D L85/ACRE APPROVED NOV. 1-MAR.1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS ACRE 5. INSTALL STORM SEWER (IF SHOWN) AND PROTECT INLETS WITH SILT GMM AND CERICEA LESPEDEZA (UNHUILED, UNSCARIFIED) so To ~ LBS/ACRE FENCING, OR OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE APPROWEO PLAN.
U ~ 0 TEMPORARY CATCH BASVN FILTER PROTEC110N, SEE AND ABRUZZI RYE 25 Les/ACRE BEGIN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. START DATE
m 7, MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH. ?AAR. t-d~ L DETAIL SHEET a MAR. 1-JUNE 1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS ACRE AND SERICEA LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED) 40 TTgo RLBEES/ACRE 6. STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP TO FINISHED GRADE WITH
8, INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR t~-' MAR. Ib-JUNE 30 WEEAND SCRCEA~SPEDEZA (SCARIFEO) 'aS TOSSOCLBS/ACRE VEGETATION, PAVING, ETC. JOB CODE
GRAPHIC SCALE O TEMPORARY SPOILS AREA, PROVIDE TEMPORARY RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE PLANTING SEASON, IF POSSIBLE, IF STAND I~AR. 1s-~ PROTECTIVE MEASURES AS DIRECTED BY EROSION SHOULD BE OVER 60% DAMAGED, REESTABLISH FOLLOWING ORIGINAL MAR. 1b-JUNE 30 HULLEEfp SERICEA BESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED) ao ~OS~oGLBS/ACRE 7. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ALL AREAS ARE SjABILIZED - COMPLETELY, CALL FOR INSPECTION BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
o LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEEDING RATES• a so o ~ so X20 240 CONTROL INSPECTOR OR' ENGINEER. TEMPORARY SEEDING 8. IF SITE IS APPROVED, REMOVE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, SILT FENCING,
~ 9• CONSULT CONSERVATION INSPECTOR ON MAINTENANCE TREATMENT AND duNE t-5 ~ F PROVIDE BACKFILL OVER STORM PIPE TO ENSURE JUNE 1-SEPT. 1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS ACRE SEDIMENT BASINS, ETC„ AND SEED OUT OR PAVE ANY BARE AREAS. REVIEW BY TOWN of KNIGHTDALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWING
~ POSITIVE DRAINAGE. FERTILIZATION AFTER PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED. m AND BROWNTOP MILLET • NURSE CROP 35 LBS ACRE ALL REMAINING PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS VELOCITY OR SORGHUM-SUDAN HYBRIDS ~(NURS CROP} 30 LBS/ACRE ~ This design has been reviewed for the Town of Knightdale by the NO, DISSIPATORS, SWALE CONSTRUCTION, AND RIP-RAP INLET PROTECTION DEVICES undersigned consulting engineer of the Town of Knightdale, and to the
w * APPLY: - CONSULT CONSERVATION ENGINEER OR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR SHOULD BE INSTALLED. best of my knowledge and belief, it conforms to the requirements ADDRIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING OTHER ALTERNATNES FOR VEGETATION establlehed In the Standard SpeciAcationa of the Town of Knightdole.
~ - O FIELD LOCATED SWALE/DITCH CENTERLINE. ALL AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE 2 TONS/ACRE q 1 inch - 60 ft, CONTOURS ILLUSTRATED ARE TAKEN FROM AERIAL FERTILIZER 10 10 10 ANALYSIS AT 800-1,000 LBS./ACRE L OF DENUDED AREAS. THE ABOVE VEGETATION RATES ARE THOSE WHICH DO WELL UNDER LOCAL CONDITIONS; OTHER SEEDING RATE coMBINATIONS ARE POSSIBLE. 9. WHEN VEGETATION HAS BECOME ESTABLISHED, CALL FOR A FINAL SITE
SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS. ACRE OF 20% o MAPPING AND ARE NOT FIELD VERIFIED. \ ANALYSIS SUPERPH HA c~ MULCH - 2 TONS (APPROX. BO BALES) SMALL GRAIN STRAW/ACRE + By Date: "NURSE CROP//TTE~MPORARY -RESEED ACCORDING TO OPTIMUM SFASON FOR DESIRED INSPECTION BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF
ANCHOR - TACK WITH LIQUID ASPHALT AT 400 GALLONS/ACRE OR ~i PERMANENT VC:GETATION. DO NOT ALLOW TEMPORARY COVER TO GROW OVER 12 COMPLIANCE. IN HEIGHT BEFORE MOWING, OTHERWISE FESCUE MAY BE SHADED OUT.
~ EMULSIFED ASPHALT AT 300 GALLONS/ACRE m
~ -
a

1
i
i
r y } r r, NOTE:
+ + I I + + + - 1. ALL STREETS ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE a
~ i ~ a f j ~ NOW OR FORMERLY ~ + + + + ~ + + + + 2. ALL OPEN SPACES AND ACTIVE RECREATION AREAS ARE TO BE DEDICATED ~ o X
o ; I ~ COZART, PROPERTY - - ~ - - TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
Q o ~ I I I ~ + + + + + + + + r. 3. THERE IS NO DESIGNATED FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE FOR THIS o o ~ m O F ~ F~ ~ t + + + - + +
~ ~ + + + + + + + Ate' ~ , 4%' ~ PROPERTY. ALL 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARYS SHOWN ON THE PLAN _ ~ N o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r + + + + ~ + T w li ~ ~ I ~ - TIMATING HEIGHTS USING U.S. • ~ I ~ r ~
z I I 17~ 1.04 ~ ~ ; > > SHEETS WERE DETERMINED BY ES ; ~ ~ l U ,rv U ~ (0
~ SITE ' ~~7°~n~v; r, 1; z 1~ ~ i , 7 „ ; ~ ' ~ I, 9a ~ 89 / ~ ~ \ 88 > ~ ~ 7 ~ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS AND BY a ~ o z ~ I ~i I ~ 19,'.99 S.F. !C,667 S.F. 0.,. S.F. A ~ (n + ~ ~ 'S5'F ~ ~ AWAY CULVERTS. ~ i HAD WATER DEPTHS FOR ROD ~ m
Y ~ I ~~Rn~ ~ ~ pig ~ ;r 9uFF ~3 i I I ~ I ~I + ~9, I ~ ','~I NYU ~ u+" ~ ` CALCULATING E _ . ~ ~ r 92 ~ ~ i~ ~i I I 1 Asst, (TYPJ ~ ~ ( 4. SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR LANDSCAPE PLANTING WITHIN . ~ 3 O ~ ~
~ C I I . ~ ~ i / 1 1,~-.~ ~ ~ I I~ I ~I ~ 35 1 ~ * 94 ~ ~ * 93 I ~ ~ I I 1 11 / ~ ~I ~ I ~ ~I 97 I * g5 r._... I I ~ ~g yq ~'c 93 ~ , ~ ~ ~ i `.FBIE HYL l ~ 0~ ~ + n.oa4 s_~_ I~ I', ~ 1 ~ ~ t>~ as ~ ~ THE TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG OLD KNIGHT RD. AND STREET TREE ~ ~ a ~ i 6~_ _ ~ ~ L ~ D7
y Imo, I I 3?a I I I ii I o. ~ '.00 ~ ~i 99 I I 96 ~ ~ x,550 8,650 SE 8295.E ~ ' 8,294 S. F. i ~I A.295 SF. ~ I Ci~'TR11 I ~ o~ ~ i I~ O I i I~ I ' I~ it )4~i 10, 1 6.547 SF. 8.648 S, F 8.543 Sr I 8.557 I !I II h I n. I N 8.~: I ~'~~+t+ + i1P a II ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ALL PLANTING TO BE ~ rn ~ ~ r" v~ ~ I ~ ~ PLANTING ALONG STREET 'A' AND 'B'.
I c i •4 F I i 6,E 5 Y ~ ~ ~ I 1G6 ~ 8,710 5.F ~ 1 I I i ~ I ' - WATEA SER CE ~~`,"F~ I I i I BB ~ a RDINANCE. ~ ~ ~ " wATa+sa ce ~ , ~ ~,,4oe s.F\^ ~ , j to IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE LANDSCAPE 0 I
~ ~ ~ I I 4~ -.F. ~ 8543 S.F. ~ ~ ~ I ~ i I L- ~ FOtE HYA ~ EASEIAENi ( 9,76fi S.F 8.6 . ~ _a l-- ~ fTYP ASSY i ~ I F] HYA RE I * 84 , ~ XISTING VEGETATION WITHIN ALL OTHER PHASE ONE BUFFERS SHALL p ~ ~ ~i > ~ ~ ~ ° E nn - 7,b6 5.~.
~ i - 1, ~ i II I. i I ~ 1-r ~ T ~ ~ ~ mi , arP~ ~ ~ N. 0 A Assn ~ w t^ ~ ~ ~ ~ - a - ~ ~ EASEMENT ( ~ ti ~ i L~L ~ T. MNS I IR E N ~ 1,1, BE PROTECTED TO MEET THE TOWNS PLANTING REQU E w~ ~ ~ < I N, >
I T ~ I I ~ , T~~~VN GF ~.~dIGHTD~A~lE i ~ 9•ss " ' + + ~ I 11 ~ I' ~ ~ ! 0 5. THE TYPE 'B BUFFER ALONG OLD KNIGHT ROAD SHALL BE OWNED AND ~ r ~~vI ~eYa ~ ~ ' _
I e' ss ANO NAT V ~ ~ f~ ' MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. E ~'~°'s v~~ ~ I r`' IN USED ONLY TO TRANSMIT ELECTRICITY ~
HIGH I , 9' s5 4 WAY 64 _ t ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~B3 i ~ ~ 6, ALL UTILITY LINES, OTHER THAN L ES o ~ + + ~ + ~ ~ 7,428 s_F. ~ ~ BETWEEN GENERATING STATIONS OR SUBSTATIONS AND THREE PHASE ELECTRICAL
I I _ ' ~ ~ ~ N ALL GROUND OR ~ a.ASS , ~ + k ~ ~ ~ i POWER DISTRIBUTION LINES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND, A D
~ ~ ~ A RIP R APRON - WA1ER 5 ~W~ ~ I ' t I S TI I1 I I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ REPL WITH EASEIAEN ~ - --I i ~ ~ ~ I I 2a9 2~ I ; -I I ~-3s' ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' ~ F R INSTALLATION SHALL BE REHABILITATED TO THE w I X245 zeG w-+a ~ ~ ~ ~ ; SURFACE DISRUPTIONS REQUIRED 0 47 246 x;~ _ . + . ~ ~ ~ ~ / IA
L ~ D . ~ ~ II j PBOP~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ I 191 _ 248 9020 SF. 247 I ~ F' 1 . ~ ~ i 1 193 ,ozo s ROA , I I I i ~ II~~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ ~ (3,02o sFl I ~ I ~ ,2.,,9 s.F. ` ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ORIGINAL OR IMPROVED CONDITION.
. ~ i07 i lip ~00 ~ ~ I i 195 I 194 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I 196 ~ ~ ~ I I ~~r ~,l 139 198 I I 197 I ~ 9,943 S.F. 7,312 S. F. I I 8.577 S.F. 192 9,020 S.F 8.914 5.. I ~ ~ / , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7. SEE RECORD PLAT FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT AREAS. ALL LOT AREAS ~ 4 ~ + *27 ~ ~ 1,021 sF. ? l 735 S.F.~ ~ K o s.F es14 s.. i ~ ~ SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
VICINITY MAP i i 'I 8,5766E I 6.577SF 9o2a5F 9,C208F ~ ~ I ~ I I I L 8,702 S.F ~ 18,577 S.F. 8,577 S, F ~ J 0 + ,2,~~03 HYA + + + ~ I
N.T,S. ~T„tir, ~ I ~ ~ Eo I ~ ~ I I I o. w I J ~P 8. TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE FUTURE PHASES + + ~ ~
I ,p9 I;II L J L J I I ~ I J ~ / + ~ SE ASEM N BEGIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED. ~ ~B' 1 EDICATED TO I 257 * 258 v, F ~ ~ N 9. ALL PASSIVE RECREATION AREAS SHALL BE D
I 8,572 SF. I ~ I; ~ I _ I I I~~~I ,8 ~ ~ I i~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ 256 I ~ 10,417 S.F~ ~ 10,227 S.F, 9, 6 S.F. ~ 9,992 S ~ p I ~ - e 70 ' ~ THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. t '~'C 7,260. ~.r~ ~ \ + ~ 2 Q ,
I II ~ _ ~ 7,aJ3 S. F. i ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ T,~ T I ~ ~ I ~ 179 ~ ~ c-- --'1 I ~ I ~ FRE`.'!0?L ~~~~IC.a ~ ~ ACDI ICNAL I ~ ~ i A~ , I, / f~ V ~ ~ 0 16,E 9 E.F. S n 4 F OT ~ ~ ~ ~4 ° ~ HT AT THE FOLLOWING STANDARD. 0 I ED At ` HA L BE L G `'R ~ ~ ~ ~ 10. ALL STREETS S L >k 255 ~ I ~ ~ ~ i
~ ,I ~ I 183 ~ SPREADER OF R.O.Ni. I~~~ ~ ~ 9., 74sc /i/ 162 ~ I LEVa 1 I 8,947 S F ~ 18.866 S.F. TAIL DITCH TO lE~E1 ' ~ ~ _ ~ 103 ~ 180 A ~V I I 7,,28 SF I I _I ~ ~ 1 * 1 < ~ 20 AC. PAS VE INIMUM AVERAGE MAINTAINED AT GRADE. ~ NYy, ~Pa 1 259 ~ ~ 1 + CANDLES M
~ ~ / 9.579 c c I I ~ ~ I _ 'fia DAYLIGHT AND - - , - ~ ~ ~ .5,e ~ F I' SPREADER ~ ~ J ~ ~ z , a R CREATION '1 ~w~ tr°~ 6~9sF ~ ~ ~ + ~ , 11. SEE RECORD PLAT FOR ACTUAL LOT NUMBERING.
I R~ - r I ~ TrF~_ ~ E~~--t ~ ,_~1E'1T ~ ,2G45s: - ~ ~V ~ QUANTITY TAKE OFF I J ~ , ~ ~ + + + t P N SPACE AND RECREATION AREAS ' + ~ 12. THE PURPOSE OF THE 0 E
I I 'I ~ / 25J R I I ~ ? I I ~ ~ / R? ~ 702a S.F. ~ 253 ,233 sF. ~ . IS TO PROTECT HEALTHY VEGETATION AND TO CARRY STORM 702a S.F. \ + '
~ 1 110 ~ I Y i ~ VII WATERLINE: I I f 6, A ~ , P I I ~ , ~ 8,369 S, F, BS~C S.F. ~ ~29P ~ ~ + ~ N FOR THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES ~ ~ + WATER. THE CLEARI G 1 + ~ + I NA FACILITIES AS GENERALLY INDICATED ON OR RECREAT 0 L
SIZE PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III I !!I!I 1 , ~ 185 ~ , 7,3406E I ~ I . 2 -i ~ + + sF ~ - ~ a ~ s THE APPROVED PLANS IS PERMITTED. ' + +
fr I ~ ~ I I \ w, ~ ~ 9,207 SF. WATERLINE 5,700 L.F. 5,453 L.F. 5,003 L.F. I ~~1~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / I I 8 I ~ l i 123 ~ / ~ ~ - + ~ 7 ACRES OF PASSIVE OPEN SPACE TO BE DEDICATED TO HOME OWNERS ` ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ + ~ 13, APPROX. 3, 828
„ f~ 1 180 LF, 1 147 L.F. 454 L.F. I ~ 1 R INE ~ i~l ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 251 6 WATE L I t 9,778 ~ A A , I ~ ~ A + + ASSO, IN PHASE III, i 267 ~ i , „ ,s F ~ ~ + 2 7,6,4 S.F. ~ NOW OR FORME~;LY 14° ALL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN RECORDED AS A PART
1~ it ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? X ~ ~ ~ ~ zzs F ~ 310 L.F. ~ ~ I 8,Sa2 SE I * 177 1~, ~ ~ FIRE 4 WATERLINE ~ e ~ Bo ~ ~ ~
I ~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ * Asst, ~ 15 EA. 13 EA. 11 EA. /i~,429 SF ~ I ~ ~ ~ 25G HYDRANTS ~ ~ ~ ~ FIRE ~ II III - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ? i ~ ~ + 9soi s.F ~ ~ i T`~ OF PHASE I, ~ \ ~ , AME., FOWLER, PR PER
~ I 17fi ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ 7,535 B.F. I ~;J ~ ~ ~ i; ~ ~ ~ 7 I ~ II ~7 ~ 7,816 S.F, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 190 ( FF 2s3.7 ~ 15, PRIOR TD PLAT APPROVAL OWNER SHALL PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS WHERE ~ 266 ~ ~ 99 . 273 9687 sF ~ I DB 2391 PAGE _ REQUIRED FOR STREET YARD AND BUFFER AREAS, A TYPE B BUFFER WILL BE
ANITARY SEWER: I ~ i ~ I ~ ~ \ 189 ~ 236 S.F. 8,55, sF ~ ~ PI~J 1765,G3-12-3617 REQUIRED ALONG OLD KNIGHT ROAD PRIOR TO PLAT APPROVAL,
Q ~ sign ~ r ~ ns SIZE L_F. LL_F. LL_F' e~.a+e~t ~ , ~ ,66 ~ O ~ I ~ I I ~ 7,996 S.F. ~ 8,551 S. F. 188 ,878 S.F. ~ 21 ~ 262 ~ I ~ Y. 7,299sF zss , 16, THE FIRST FLOOR FINISH ELEVATIONS FOR ANY LOT THAT LIES IN WHOLE OR IN 9 z
W R 277 L.F. ~ ~ ~ 124 ~ ~ e. 9: 12 SEE ~ I ~ f / 2 N ° ~o a 3 ~ PART IN A FLOODFRINGE OR FLOODPLAIN AREA SHALL BE GIVEN ON THE FINAL a,~s3 sa ~ / ~ N 8264 AzsY 7, 57 B.F. ~ PLAT, LOTS 191, 268, 314 ARE GIVEN SUCH FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS,
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 9s2a s,F. 8 SEWER 7,923 L.F. 7,737 L.F. 6,817 L.F. ~ l 1 ~ ~ 125 ~ ~ p : ~ 269 ~ - N HT ROAD SHOULD BE OWNED AND ~ 3'B ~ ~ ,9s~6 sF o < < ~ ~ 17° THE TYPE B BUFFER LOCATED ALONG OLD K IG
I I , I ~ ~ ~ / 275 MANHOLES 45 EA. 45 EA. 45 EA. ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ 7 ~ \ / 9,7938E 27s 8.793 sF_ ~ ~ n. C N BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATIDN, els3sF ~ v MAINTAI ED
V l ~ , ~ 774 ~ V ~ , ,B7 ~ I i26 7.299 S.F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 263 CIS z ~ 8,196 S.F * 7B S 8, THE STREET PLANTING REQUIREMENTS ARE ENFORCED AS A CONDITION TO A I--- V , ` w
~ sign ' ~ ~ \ 9,969 ~.F. A ~ ~,pf~" VA STORM DRAINAGE: I mE~, ~ ~ ~ a i F AT OF OCCUPANCY FOR THOSE LOTS THAT HAVE THIS REQUIREMENT, THE Q z ~ E'er 7283 sF 1 CERTI IC E ~ ~ ' ~ FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ~
SIZE L_F. LL_F. L_F. ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ 941x3 ~ I I ~ I ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .192 2F ~ , i \ I ' , 1~~ < HOMEBUILDER OF EACH LOT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE ~ 9,41t~Sf. .043 S. F. I I~ ~ STREET TREES ON EACH LOT ACCORDING TO THE CONSRTUCTION PLANS PRIOR TO ~
4 .F. 1 484 L ` ~ 247 F. 808 L.F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /i;, 15 R.C.P. 1,93 L I I ~ . i . ~ ~ ~ ~ }21 ~ ~ THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF CCUPANCY, U ~ ~ 7,358 S.F. i
~i u ~ ~ A ' / ~ ~ ~ 127 ~ ~ , , 10.544 S. F. ~ ~ ~ 438 L.F. 116 L.F. 294 L.F. ~ A ~ ~ , / 18 R.C.P. I l~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7,25, sF ~ ~ 6 ~ ~
" 728 L.F. 276 L.F. 250 L.F. O / ~ / ~ ~ 12 24a 24 R,C.P. ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~*~7 ~ W zn ~Ji6 ~ 320 8614 S.F.
~ i \ ~ ~ ~ 128 / 3,181 S.F. 38 L.F. 1~3 I 30 R.C.P. l : ~ \~V l i ~ s.. ~ 3L2 I Ina s.F ~ N PACE TO BE - ~ 9..2. s.F. ~,D&3 e t ~ 1 323 ,ue s.F. ~ j~ 4.90 ACRES GREENWAY AND OPE S F ~ ~ Q
77 ~ ~ ~ ; 572 L.F. 128 L.F. 108 L.F. / ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ 1, / R.C.P. I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 36 ~ ~ 7 69 SF 2 G 242 ' ~ ~ ~ I 324 ~25s " DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE ~ 1 1 * ''425 s ~ RATION OF PHASE I ~
~ ,zz ~i, ~ P. 172 L.F. / , ~ , ~ ~ 7,767 6~~ 7,566 S F. 42 R.C. ~ I ~ UPON PLAT RECD D 1 X3,590 S.F. ~ t~ Q 2 8 \F'IRE / * 325 ~ 1 ~ I O
7 r ~ , , ~L9 ~ A 82 L.F. / ~ ~ 48 R.C.P. 66 L.F. l I ~ ,i~• ,7G~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11,604 S. F. 1 11,945 SF.~ ~ ~ ,a f ~ -
/ 1 ;i ~ ~ i 114 L.F. i i I I ~ , ~ ~ ~ 54 R.C.P. I ~ i/ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6,7,2 ~F ~ 202 ~ * 24, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ 3,9 ~ 0.20 AC. PASSI I I I - - 8,696 9.F." 6 UJ " VE I I I
i X21 ~ r ~ 114 ~ 7- ~ ~ - ~ 130 ~~V 7,622 S, F, 7,748 S.F. 98 x63 ELLIP. PIPE ~ i~ ~ ~ \ i ` .,F B2B3 F RECR ~ Z . am EATION n + + + + + + ~ f--
ASINS 49 EA. 28 EA. 22 EA. I ~ ~ ~ CATCH B 20 TYPE B I ~ ~ ~ / / A Y. + ~1 + + + + + + + + + + + \ / ~ 268 > z
I I ~ ~ \ ~ 169 YARD INLETS 2 EA. 1 EA. BUFFER EASEMENT--~- , 120 / ~ ~ ~ 203 11,4'sF. ' ~~~~pq ~ + + + + + + 4 + + + , vvv/// 7.534 s.F. ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ Q - S F. 4 + y~, + + + + 75 L. ~ ~
~ ~A, ~ ~ ~ 137 A 8,702 S. F. ~ 7,279 S.F. JUNCTION BOXES ~ 1 ~ + + + + + PU~LIC .571 S. F. + + } ~ ~G~ U ~^l + + - I ~ O F , ~ + ~ + M ~ + ~ ~ 1 ~ TYPICAL TEMPORARY m ~
4 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ' + + + r ~ ~ ~ P} + ~ ~ + + + \ + + ~ 6 CABC CUL-DE SAC
~ Q 115 i~ ~ ~ ~ ( + + TREETS: ~ 119 ~ ~ S 1 ~ ~ , , A ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 204 + + + + ~ ~ ~ + + + + + +
~ 168 8,240 L.F. 4,990 L.F. 5,376 L.F. ~ \ ~ + STREETS ,1,319 SF. + + + , ~ ~ 716 ~ ~ 132 ~ 8,736 S.F. 3,4 * ~ + + ~ + + + + + + ~ + ~ + MARKS CREEK n ~ LI i + ,.,43 ~ I ~ W 279 ~p 1041 SF. y, + +
~ , ~ + SIDEWALK 5 WIDTH 6,180 L. F, 4,771 L.F. 5,075 L.F. 7 ~ + + + + 0. 7 S.F. F.F. = P-~ ~ + ` + ,RAb j,d ~ ~ ~ w 1~ J ~ / * ~
° ' S + F ~ 117 \ %18 ~ ` + 1 11 ~ + - , / ~ + + + jN 7 ~E. ~ ~ ~ U
~ I ~ ~ ~ ; , 167 ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ + + r i J ~ % . ~ A I / ~ ~ ~ 133 ~ 8.d93 B, F. + + +r + ~ ~ 313 ~ 9,60 S.F. PRIVgTz ? ~ ~ ~ ~ 20' 0 Gf~ ~ ~
+ 280 8,643 S. F.~ ~ ~ ~ EASE ENT INV T' ~ ( ~I ~ 8583 s.F. 11 ~ ~,c329 \ (r~P(*~ + + ~ ~ MARKS CREEK ~ ~ I ~ F. 2 S ~ lIJ
O i ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ c 1 I/ 1 } } / iRAP 5 Z 5 ~ / ~ ~ _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 239 TRAP 5 ~ J 10,560 S.G. ~ ~ .CTS, ~ 239 ~ i~l i Q•
~ 166 + + I ~ .l 9,339 S.F. 11,267 S.F. .,-31 ' r' i - 1 ~ PR~,VAT< ~ ~ ~ TRAP 4 b t1,267 S.F. ~ I I ~ 333 ~ ~ ~ P Q
_ N~~~,>r CP r C1RMr RAY , PASSIVE AREA PHASE III 3.59 AC T , ~ _ ,34 E°~EMENrAF' ~ + + TOTAL ~ ~1 ~J ~ 112 ~ *328 9.042 S.F. ~ f 281 8,751 S.F. ~ c ~
W.H. PC~I~~_E PB?ER. Y ~ 1 205 zan ~.F. ~ 7 / \ y ~ 3 8,522 S.F. 238 ~ ~ ~
DB 1064 PAGE 128 1 I f ~ ,4 1 ~ ~ * 236 i , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1, 1 1. ~ ~ ~ 1z.ov s.F. PIN i%55.04?0-o~4g ~ ' ~ 1 ' ~ ~i I ~ 1, ~ ~ 1 ~ I 7,x53 s.F. * ~ ~ ~ ? .BB' SF C ~f1 4.90 ACRES GREENWAY AND OPEN SPACE 7,653 S.F. I ~ ~ 336 ~ ~ ~ * DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
I / ~ ? 1 I j I'~ ~ I I ~ ~I I ~l 3„ ~ '.,74 S.F ~ ~ UPON PLAT RECORDATION OF PHASE I
+ + ~ 8 3 l 1 'i I ~I 3 ~ ~ fi 5 1 11 ~ iI ~ ~ 1 I + + + -STREAM BUFFER I ~ l ~ 1 1 -I I ~ 11 135 ` 9,882 S.F. 237 327 \ ~ < RAi, A 1 , PRIV TED N GE t~~t W 282 8,728 S.F. ~ EAS tE S-(. , PU ~C Sp t ~ ~ 7 V
---~J ' ~ 15 ~ J I 206 ~ I 'i ~ I, I 7,454 S.F. * 237 I~ ^P 7, 62 S.F. 334 ~ ~ 20 17LItt i* 2.F J^ $6 ~ EASE NT7, 63 5 J 7,454 S.F. 8,04~S.F. 335 (TYP) / /
+ , ~ 1 I 1 I 1 ~ 8,550 S, F. ~ I ~ X515 SF. /
~ ~ I I I ~ ~ CORNER I I I crT r,~ ~ 1 ~ ~~I I i 15a I Ili ~ 37 00 00 W ~ ~I !I F -I ___i .SS / 326 I, ~I' V 310 ~ *71
I ~ 36 8,827 5 236 510.00 I ~ 1s I 1'~ I zol I 1 F 7,142 S. F. I ~ 8,81 S.. 236 ~ 283 7663 S.F. I l.'
ACKFLOW I 1 ~ ~ 7,490 s.F. NOTE: PER N.C. PLUMBING CODE SEWER B { I I_ 7,480 S.F. ~ 8767 S.F. -"'1 i ~ ~ i ~
- VA VES WILL BE NEEDED FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN PHASE lll. I I~,I ~I 6.245 SF. L ~ I ~ o 9,081 S.F. I ~ ~ 7 ~ , ~
' FF R EASEMENT - - I ~ ~ I ~ 20 TYPE B BU E i I ~0 I ,63 PRIOR TO INSTALLING SERVICES ENGINEER SHALL ~ ~ , 235 A 1 7 8683 S.F. ~~A I i 3C9 ~ LTV 235 ~ i 284 ~ I~ ~ ~ J
T R TO IDENTIFY THESE 3 ~ ~ ~ ' ~I ~ COORDINATE WITH CONTRAC 0 ~ ~ 1 ~ 2oe I ~ ~ 7,785 S.F. 17 ' es9s s.F. J ~ ~ ~ ~ 7,785 S.F. 8,626 S.F. ~ ~ ~ 345 ~ 69 ~
WER BACKFLOW DEVICES. ~ ~ LOTS THAT REQUIRE SE J I III 7,464 SF. EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK _ ~ ~ ~~s~, 14216 S.F. 9,1aa S.F.
23a U I 344 i ~ u~ ~3a * 308 740 341 342 343 ~ ~ 8,606 S,F.
I i 138 I 152 I i ~209~ 18 I i I ~1 I 8,640 SF. ~ I j * 7,313 S.F. i 7.313 S.F. ~ ~ 285 8,052 S.F. 1D,001 S. F. 8,597 S.F. 8,859 S.F. 8673 B.F. ~ 68
VI S: f 7 44, s F R ACKFLOW DE CE I ~ I I, LOTS THAT MAY REQUIRE SEWE B i L~. ~ I 8165 S.F. ~ ~ ~ '/\V 9,144 S, F.
83 84 85 86 - I 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, I I i^ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ 346
HOME PARK I 233 EXISTING MOBILE ~ 4 245 250 251 252 ~ I ~ I 161 ~ ~ 188 189 190 191, 239, 2 0, , 233 * 307 S.F. 8,570 7.320 S.F. 7,320 S.F. 67
' 1 ° 19 139 I * 210 7.320 S.F. 8,640 S.F. I I I I` 7.440 S.F, I 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 267, 268 _ 286 ~ ~ 7 9,110 S.F. * 352 ~ 351
269, 270, 271, 272, 314, 315, 319, 320, 321, 322 ~ ---J S.F. 339 8,520 9,327 S.F. 8,346 S.F. 8,715 S.F. / ~ \ 347 / PUBL'~~C O
23~ 323, 324, 325, 330 ~ ~ 7.320 S.F. I ~ ~ 2.1 ~ 23~ I i 6 353 / 20' U>ll TY Ql r 30 7.320 S.F. 8,520 S.F. 9,499 S. F. 8,011 S.F. ~ ETAYS~MEN1 ° RUN 0~ MARKS CREEK IS RR~RERTY ~1~'E
20 I I 160 i ~287~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t 66 ( ) ~ Cri _ ~ ~ V ~ s2o3s.F. rv CENTERLINE GF CREEK AS LLGAT'~D
I~ ~ III 140 8.640 S. F- ii I~ 7,x40 ~.F. I J--~ j11 ! ~ I I I. 1 I ; i ~ ----I ~~231~ N 7 fi47 S.F 338 ~ * 350 ~ i f'-- ~ ~ ~
NEW 6 WOOD FENCE I ~ I ! 'li I!i ~ 8,20 I ~ i ~ 8, 58G S.F. I S.F. ~ 231 i II ~ 305 ~ ~i I ~ ~ ~ r--- ~ q PRI
~ ~ ~i 21~ I 7.320 S. F. T1 I 159 I 7,440 S.F. 7.320 S. F. ~ I 3 9 65 20 IN C 8,5'.2 S.F. 348 ~ EAS N * 288 02 B.F. 10,969 S.F. 9,739 S.F.
J ~ 8,640 S.F. I I I I I~ 141 347 S.r'. 337 ~ 354 / PRIVATE ~ -z,_~ 8,
~c 230 \ 20' ORAINA ~c 230 9,724 SF. 9,024 S.F. EASEMENT ~
~ 13 I 2 8,436 S.F. (TYP) B 436 S.F. ~ 64 i \
22 158 9,108 S.F. 9,127 S.F. ~ ~ V 9,870 S,E
I 14Z 355 I ~ ~ ~ 9,719 S.F, 356 \ ~ ~
SITE PLAN DATA I I ~ \ 67
1. EXISTING ZONING - R-7 CONDITIONAL USE - - _ - 304 289 ~ \ 8.058 ~ ~ \ ~c 357 9,631 S.F. __._J \
2. TOTAL ACREAGE - 114.15 ACRES i /~0 PRIVA NAGE
3. TAX MAP DATA: WAKE COUNTY PIN: 1755.04.91.2724 AND 1765.03.01.2808 - ~ 143 I \ ` ~ ~ EASEMENT ( Y 229
_ N -l i I I I ` 229 ~J I I i ~ ~ I 3sa I ~ ~ I ~J,hS~~T 6Z~ ~ N~n~.~ nD ~nQM~QI Y
4. PROPOSED USE -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ~ I 3 I ~ III 24 " ~ ~ I ~ ~ V * 359 ~ B,7B5 S.F. ~ vu w o u
R VI USLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION I! III II ~ 5. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT PART OF A P E 0 ~ 290 ~ - ~ T ~N TTE P~~~E PROPERTY ~ 8,,82 s F A N N E -I i _ I~ v
J ~ i i57 I 228 6. PROPOSED PHASE III LOTS - 95 ,44 z2a DB 2275 PAGE 377 z ~ v o i i i ~l -
- 7 000 S.F. ONLY WHERE ADDITIONAL RECREATION AREA PROVIDED w ~ I ~ ~ 2,5 , 7. MINIMUM LOT SIZE i -1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ 3 _t (n 36. V PIN 176,03 ~1-~~07 _ _ i EXI IIV~ 1 8,232 s r > ~ 291 ~ ~ J 370 ~yJ
„ o i II ~ I ~ - OTS ARE DESIGNATED WITH AN ~ AND AREAS STATED c 2< I I ~ i____ ~ I THESE L I L~ 3
~ ~ ~ I I 227 8. AVERAGE LOT SIZE - 8,750 S.F. o - I ~ 227 PMT - ~ \ \ i ~ ~ ~
9. THIS PROPERTY IS TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS - ~ ~ ~ ,45 ~ ~ ~ i C # ~ j l i I z,e ~ 362 ~ ~ 372 ~ nl N ~ ~ ~ GOAD ~ ~
z ~ ~ ~ ~ HA ARD BOUNDARY - NO ~ Q ~ ~ I I - ~ 10. INSIDE FLOOD Z 25 ; ~ I „ ~ 30, i i 292 ~ ~ V
~ II I ~ 11. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN A DESIGNATED DRAINAGE AREA ~ - --j 226 226 ~ r--- ~ ~ C ALE GRAPHIC S ~ ~ 373
- ~ ~ I I i45 ~ 1 I ~ 12. LINEAR FEET OF STREETS = 18,606 L.F. (TOTAL) _ i55 217 , i
NSW DR FERMER~Y ~ I ! , AREA IN RIGHT-OF-WAY = 22.28 AC. (TOTAL) I ~ ; L___ _I 13. K,NETT PARK LTD. PARTNERSHIP ~ 25 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ too o so too 2ao ~ I ~ 369 ~ 60 400 300 I 293 ,I
! ~ I RAIN GREENWAY = 1.24 AC. ~ r--- 225 14, A E J I 225 J I ~
DB 5946 PAGE 955 ?-I i TA OPEN SPACE DEDICATED TO TOWN - 4.90 AC. (TOTAL) I i I 15. TO L _ - -3386 - ~ 154 I I I 2 5 J li ~ I \ 364 ~ (IN FEET) ~ ~
A PASSIVE RECREATION SPACE DEDICATED TO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 10.19 AC. (TOTAL) PIN 1754,08 89 TOT L I 1 Q ~ ~ ~--J ~ - ~ 374 ~A,11 ah = 100 it. O ~ ~
16. MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS: i 27 ~ I 'I I 299 37s I 69 V` 1 In 294 ~ , ~ G~~ W lY CQ
224 i FRONT - 30 I ~ f ~ I \ 'S 0 N ~ 224 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn 368 365 I \ Q z U
' I I I i REAR - 20' I 2,9 - I L ~ U z i ~I 367 1 I LLB ~f'~ ~ ~ . co
r , a8 ~ ~ L____ ~ ~53 __.J 58 I 298 1 -
SIDE - 8 i 28 I ; I ~ i~ 296 ' ` _ L \ ( ~ ~ W J o ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ - J
CORNER SIDE - 20' I~ ~ I L-- ~ ~ I' ~i ~ 223 I T'r ~ I 2za 223 t ~ ~1 366 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s W
N WNER: ' ~ i ~ ~ 17. LA DO I III I ; ~ I I I I 'S2 I J 1_ 297 ~ i ~ ~ 'I~ \ ~ ~ z [1i
GOWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ~ 29 149 II of o- I ~ I i I i~ ~ - ~ , W 296 ~ ~
A i 7324 SIEMENS ROD I i i r-- i III I-- I ~ I ~ ~CNT RLI~it ~ ~ E r, s7 2 ~ I ~ ~ ~ , ~F MARk'S ~,.~R_i=K _ ~ ~ ~ 54 ~ ~
N.C. 27591 ' ! II ;,i I ~ 2~2 Q WENDELL, I. r-I II i I II I o L'~ I I 2z~ ~ v ~ _ ~ ~ I, 1, IBC ~ <.I ',I, I IS PB~~PER'Y L;NE J-~,- , ~r A i..
o ~ ~II~~ I R A N [phone] ~ i ~ ~ li' 3C I ,5 ~ I ~ ~ ` ~ I N SPACE _ i- _ i ~ ~ , , I 53 ~ ' 4.90 ACRES GREENWAY AND OPE 1 ~ r~~ - I~
m ~ II i1~ III ,50 ~ i Q 18, REGISTERED SURVEYOR: i I _ I~ i ~ .i- - I ~ I I 1. ~ A - ir-- , ~ ~ ~ -1 DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTD LE
m ROBERT T. NEWCOMB & ASSOCIATES, P.C. I! ~ ~ _ - N ' ~ I ' ~ ~ - _ - _ _ _ - ~ - ~i I s2 ~ ~ 376,E ~ UPON PLAT RECORDATION OF PHASE I z ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ W
MI BROOK ROAD ~ I ~ ' ~ n 1i-- ~ -1 0 262 W. LL I, ~ I ~ _ r ~ ~ ~ r ~ _ ~-rr , J ~ ae ~ U
RALEIGH, N.C. 27609 ! ~ - - ~I 48 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I t ~ ~
N - I / - - - - i 919 847-1800 ( ) 1 i ~ <6 I I' I I ~ / ss ~ 0 DRAWN a5 I ~ / I 44 ~ ~ K
U ~ ~ ~ o I `1 42 19. CIVIL ENGINEER: ~ ~ I i 4} ~ ~ ~ I 56 ~ ~ M 42 ~ , ~ ~ CHECKED
~ 4. ~ 32 I ; ~ i L 36 ~ ~ 40 PARQUER, P.C. ~ S9 ~ y
~ i ~ ~ ' ~ 3e I~ ~ ~ 37 ~ APPROVE
4926 WINDY HILL DRIVE - / ~~i, I ` ~ ` ~ GMM
RALEIGH, N.C. 27609 ~ ~ Y I I V ~ ~ i 33 35 0 SWAMP START DAT
[phone] I ~1 ~ , a 4/99
m ~ ~ Y ~ ` h~ JOB CODE ~ ~
a a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PC984601 A ~ I A `
~ ~ ; ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~
o ~ ~ ~ , a REVIEW BY TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWING
a N89°56'00"E 173424' This design has been reviewed for the Town of Knightdale by the NQ,
L undersigned consulting engineer of the Town of Knightdale, and to the
~ ~ ~ E ~ W \ best of my knowledge and belief, it conforms to the requirements NOW ~K FORMERLY _II~ established in the Standard Specifications of the Town of Knightdale.
L SQUARED PROPERTY
3 ~ EXISTING CHAIN LINK i-ENCE By. Date: DB 2046 PAuE 166
U' I T i PIN 175408-99-3532
L v
P: \4601 A-EMERALD3\DWG\C-1,DWG
0

~ ~ ~ rya ~ , U
I i ' - J r
j i r 1 r-. .__I ~ i x
~ ~ r ~ ~ _ ~ ~ o
\ ~ ~I ~ ' ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ _ 'i 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r c
_ ~ - ~ I i~~ 0 O ~ (0 ~ O
' J NEW DR F~ERMER~Y 1 , / _ I , 2 cv I co ~ ~ ~ / -o ~
~ C~ZART PROPERTY 1 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ i n v ~ ~ co 0
J j ~ ~ ~ ; % I 1V ~ c z l ~ ~ - ' ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ,.rn
PIN 175504-93-1551 ~
BLOW OFF - T'~~`~ , rn ~ ~ c I 0 ASSY. - ~ _ ~ ` ! '~i o~ N
~ 1 ~ 5 8 - E - 8 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ N r~ ~ i ~ ~1j ° 1 I I ~ ~
HW ELts i 1 ~ - i ~ ~ .li ~ ~ ~
e ~ ~ ~ 1 1 i P~1.~ , i 1 ~ ~ / ~ , l J v ~ O~ ~ V ' c r 8 ~ w ;
~ 4V i 1 a 87 3 ` S l ~ 1 1 i ~ 11 lt.-- 1 / 1 -z ,z, -~=t,X ~ ` /1 ~ !j__ ~ ~ INV~1N=29 4 . ~ ~ 86 ~ i - ~
" ~ ~~1' INV OUT-2 .9 ~1N=29 4 87 OU1=2 .9 I U
YP F ~ ' ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~'`L ! ~ 91 # i; - C.B. BC > 1 _ 91 C . `1', 1-~D TOP-302.25 FIRE HYD. ' ~ , ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ 92. C.B.#8A 0 ~ ~l~ 1 ; ~~1 1~. i ~ 95 94 ~ 93 ~ "-S' ~ 96 ~ ~ ~ TOP=302.25 I 9A D _ SILT ~ INV IN-297.81 ASSY. (TYP,) ~ ~ : ~ ~
- - 97 Q ~ 7 ~ INV IN=298.43 ~ ?.25 ~ L ~ INV OUT=297.7 , FIRE HYD, FEl>aCE I ~ ~ ` V 298.43 ~ SY. YPJ 85i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i 101 100 99'~~,~, 9a ~ 1p2 ~ ~ T=298.3 `2 , _ OLD TR 1 ~ TRhf' - ~ ~ 1 ~ =298.3 ~ 38 LF 18" P - - - ; ~ ~ 'I > ~ ~ ` '
103 ~ ~ ( z ~ I DIVERSI TRAP t Q ®0.5 - ~ .B. 8D ~ ' # ! ~ ,
~ #7 I CLEAR~N ~8.~1 DITCH (YP. ~ R' SE CE IN .37 ` LF 1 P TO =303.00 % DIVERSVO ~ I 1 ~ » P _ 88 IN IN-297.52 ~ ti
j' T0~ 327.67 5' WATE u~~~ ~ = FIRE HYD. EASEMENT' ( p ~ INV T 323. _ OUT=296.52 DIT TYP. , 1 h
FIRE HYD, Y, (YP,) CE 27 LF ~8 P i ~ ~ ~ 84 ~ ~ \ ~
~ 5 ATER SE ASS . (TYP) 2 L• - 5 R ~ .50 . _ A MENT (T E ~ ~ ~ W ® .5°!0 ~ ~ Q V ~
N ` I I ~ i ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ I- _ o ~ ~ , ~ Cp - ~ o o » F q ~ ~ ~ W N., " F R ~ i ~p ~ A
rn J B" SS ~ O 9 N S F.E: T R~ l ~ ~ C~ CO ~ CF FIRE HYp,~ ~ ~
~ 5 F.E. w o ~ ~ \ ASSY, / ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 8° S o ~ ~ ~
~ SS o ~ \ p N i I / ~ ~
C 2. IN = ~ ~ _ 15°tR C.B ~ } ~ ~ ~ 83;~ I ~ ~ ~
5 ~ . D 'WATER SERVICE ~ I TO 32 57
RIP R APRON - _ CLASS 1 6.84 EASEMEN (TYP•) C.8.~2 ! I -322.91 - L=3~' TO - 2 ~ O Nei i ~ - 2 m~ j ( ~ GENERAL NOTES -EROSION CONTROL _ ~ I 8
I ~ IN 332.7 REPLA WITH I, TOP=327.67 ~ NV UT-322.81 249 2 "~60 W=40' ~ =2 246 C.B. ~ ?-ES~ N Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1. ALL NSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS
I ~ INV 0 T=3326 PROPO D CB DIVERSION i INV IN~323. 6 ; 191 248 247 i I I 1 ~ C.B. E ~ ~ I I DITCH (TYP.) INV10l3T 32 .56~ ~ I TOE,=~ E NV'~0, ` ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ AND T RADING PERMIT ISSUED BY WAKE COUNTY FOR THIS PROJECT,
i ~ ~ I 194 ~ ! j INV' =296. i ~I I ; 4UT= 6. u; I ~ it 199 198 i 197 196 195 ~ 0 6.17 (F ~ ~ G J'' -296. 1 ~ ®p 4 ~ ~ ~ ..~J j OUT= 6. ~ 'S~ R b S 82 ~ ~i
j 192 ~ ;,,n ~ ~ ~ 2 CIE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE SS ~ IE ~ ~ I FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO LAND
I I o ! / 8 " 8 \ SILT FEt3~~ ~ FENCE > 'S 1 ~ , , DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY BOTH ON AND OFF SITE.
® / 9k0 1 , ~ FIRE tlI~UERSION ~ i C.B. ,
ING ~~iTf~ T ~ _ \ T =30 ~ 3. TOTAL DENUDED AREA ON SITE 9.50 AC _ _ - z
; ~ i j'LIMI (TYB:~ _ v-2x7.3 ~ p E 1 1 . ~ ~ ; DA=0.6 AC. - T ~ 'i ~ ~ ~ Q ~
EMEN _ ~ , _ ~ ~ EAS ~
~ % ~ ~ ~ 257 $ ~ i~ 257 ; 81 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ o z ~ c9 ~ ~
i 256 % / , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~
% ~ ; /~J i ~ i FES ~3A ~ / p ~ ~ \ 270 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~V OUT=322.00 SPREAD R ~ \ ~ NgTUR ~ ~ . A( ~ ~ / O ~ SPREq o n ~ ~ L1J
~ ~ ~ LEVE READ ~ p, ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ j FI E HYB,, FR ® ~ ~ ~
A: 271 +11.2339 TAIL DITCH TO p r~' ~ FIRE HYD, R~C~ A; ~ DAYLIGHT AND LEVEL 2~ ~ A Y, (TYP.) SE ASS , (TYP.) \ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~
S,S ' SPREADER ~ E`'~~'S~ ~ F ~LN ° H 291 7 e R I < ~
~ STA: 70+00.0000 ~ 254' E ~ ~ ~ ~ - O ~ ~ ~ I
_ ,6 ~ ~ . ' G~ ~ ~ ; - 0 L o' U \ ~
~ ~ 253 I-I ~ I ~ W
~ ~ ~ ~ \ . ~ ~ ~ ag •A i Y---~''' ~ ~ w Z ~.1 6 C
~ .1~ ~~,I~ ~ ~ ~ .B.#228, n ~ ~ I ~ ~ / p0 P=X25.06 ~ ~ - / ~ (I~
~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 252 ~ ~ 5 ~ ~~~IN=319.21 ~ 1 ,i i j ; ' ~ ~ < ~ I ~ Q - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~0' STR I r n t, +0 ~ i V J
~ % ~ ~ 6-~~ ~ i / _ , IN OUT=319:fi1~ x ~ N BUFFER ' = O \ v ~ ~ . ' i ~ O
~ ~ 0;~ ~ ~ rn ~ I ~ _A1~ A 20 SANI ~ ~ I , i ~ ~
~ ~ - ~ ' ~ I x DER ~ i R ~ I I ~ a0' 3-b 1 u' W
1 251 ~ ~ 'N 261 1 ~ ~ 261 1 / o, 4 ~ ~ L1J 2 i ~ x 00 ~ ~ ~ W
~ ~ ~ ~ Op i ~ ~ " FIRE HY ~ ~ i x ~ o C.B. 2 » ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ % - ASSY, (TYP, ~ o / _ - ~k s / o ~ 24 S / ~ ' ii ~ TOP=309.1 -S ~ W
~ G 250 ~ ~ p P=324.99 ~ J ~ / INV IN=303. '22 ' ~ _ ~ 80 ~ ~ .8. 24C~'
~ p0 I VOUT=319.35 k I ~ NV OUT 303.1 = ~ \ (n ~ , ~
1 ~ Z ~ ~1 _ , _190 273 y 1' 25L 1 "RCP 266 ~ I - ~ ~ - .83 I 1 Q ~
V 302.73 ~C:B.~2 JIVE ~ ~ i 4 FENCE roP= i ~ ~ Q
j ~ ~ - ~ ~ DI'~tSION ~ ~ Y.1 #24A _ _ ~ P ~ ~ TO =308.00 • .256 2 CP INV IN=300. _ ~ 1' z C.9:~25C H I i ~
i k / 1 > ~ DITCH TYP. ~ j I I ~ 1 262 _ _ 0 _ ~ I IN 0 TOP-305. _ INV OUT-30 .40 1 , W TOP- 5.19 AS P.> ! 1 ~ W
i i / ~ 4 ~ ~o. ' INV IN=301 INV IN= 1.26 ~ ~ I ~ ' 1 - ~ I ~ 1 U T-30..0 INV OUT=~ 01.16 ILA w ~
i j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 264 ~ ,B. 25A FI Y 35LF 1 RCP FENCE
o CLEARING ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ i ~ C.B ~ ~ sY. a W C.B. I P=305.~~ ®1. 8 % ~
uMiTS nr~. r ~~~T_:~~ 1 i~~~ ~ ' 1 N: ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ^ ~ 3 \ \ ~ 318 ~ r JI I.JL i II v „U 1=JVL.L/ [v~ ~ r L,N~ lJ ~1
275 V c^ ~ ~ ~ INV ~I / ~ V IN=306.26 35LF 5 RCP C.B,~23C X71+ti 0 ~ INV OUT=306.16 _ 7 = ~ OP-307.77 ®0. ~ ~ W ~L S M ~ / J
263 I V IN=302.83 CE ~ 6 ~ R ~
~ ~5 - SERA I ~ r VOUT-302.73 R ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ , wp'(E ~ Q t ~ )78 ~
- / ~ I FES k ERS 1 1 00 5~ N ~ NSW DR E~RMERLY ~E ~ F- 40LF 15" CP 5 o i165 i '
i TY " l ~ 317 ' 27LF 15 RCP 35' LT ~ ~ P ~ 0 9 ~ !9 0.50 E ~ t _ ~ w ®8~~ I
I ~ ~ 6 ~i ~ 276 0 t JAMES'~~ E~WLER P`~RGPEf o ~ _._2 ~
~ ~ , ? ~i ~ ~ 243 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 2 1 ~ D ! DB 2391 PAGE '299
_ 'TOP=3 321
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I T=306.39 ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ - ~ ,PIN 1 65,03 12 617 6 TOP 0 .3 LEVEE SPREADER ,
i ~ ~ 68LF 15" RCP ~ i INV IN= 0.13 ' I~ 111LF 24" RCP ~ ~
\ ~ / DIVERSION o 0.50 ~ ~ 2 ~ 244 277 ~ ~ INV OUT 300. ~ ~o •#26A 77 `n N o - k -295.50 ,
' YI 1 ~ ~ $ ITCH (TYP. 31s _ \ # S :106+8.1452 ~ . - a DIVE SION =3 C 3 ~ ~ z 32o SIGN
OF T: 0„0000 L o ~ ~ o DITC TY N ' E ~ ~ TYP. ~z i ( . T - 6 ~
1 CB ` \ V ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ FES D VERSION INV IN=302.39 ~ FES.#25E - - ~ 324 ~ _ ~ \
~ ~ V ~ 242 ' OUT = 3 JO ~ I CH TYP. INV OUT-302.29 INV OUT,~199.4 ~ , + 3 " P - - TAIL DI ~ 5 F 1~" RCPT \
~ ~ 'C ~ } I ~ ~ ~ ~ / , 278 ~ 2 LF, T8 FTC ; ~~~.509~ TO DA f ~
i 1 ` ~ i ,g,#21 VE SPREADER FIR H F R Y , 3 5 TO LEVEL ®O.~OX ~ I H ~ 2
h % YI ~ ~ OP=313.60 AID YPJ ~ FES. 23E FES.#~66 ~ ~ AID ~ ~ ~ - dl NV OUT=302.18 VEL SPREAD R OUT-719. i ,
\ / \ ~ % INV IN=306.36 ~ / ~ ~ / 2,,41 ~ INV OUT=306.26 ^~n ~ \ ~
\ ~ ® i 319 5 ~ 1 I Q ~ ~ 761
/ v, ~ _ / 321~`.F.-15"RCP 0 EV.-301 ~ 1 7 0 ~
~ ~ / A X17 i % ~ \ " r i ~ I p0 % F 108 FIR Y , o
~ 24 L.F RCP®1~ LASS "1" A1.i ' , AC ~ IN OUT X98.94 A SY, , 268 ~ ~ N
L=22' I ~ \ 14 +00 7+ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 (OLD TRA B)
\ • ~ 1 / ~ f~2 i 1 \ ~ ~ , 8 ~ A x O, 7 TRAP 3 00 ~ _ 1 2
I FE 16 ~ \ ~ ~ ®C.8.~19 F.E.S ~1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ TOP=306.)30 INV 3 ~ W SE P Pueuc_ IkT ~ ~ SE NT READER 20' -ur~uTY ~ - ' ~
~ ~ \ \ INV-306:60 I \ ~
! ~ ~ ~ A~\ \ ~ ~ V ® B ~ / ~ ~ 8 L.F.- CP 4 TYF; SILT ~ y H B ~ v
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ j /40 LF.T36"RCP .86 L SPREAUI~R TOP i ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ i i ~ INV A R TOP 9X ~fENCE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ INV ~
' ~ ~V ILT , ~ _ ~ ~ ¦ ~ 330 314 p " ~0 > y TRAP OgREAGE DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH L~NCTH TYPE
~ ~ i F .S. ~1 ES.~1 314\ ~'e~'' ~ I - IN OUT = ~ ~ - _ ~ I - V-3 , i 279 TRAf~•. 20 TRAf~~. 20 3 166 13LF 1 RCP ~ x~ , _ _ _
A i ~ J % _ _ , 1 CB .2 ~ ~ ~ i ~ _ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ®0.5 ~ , 1 1 0.73 AC 10 STANDARD V - 5 12 24 T ~ 1
\ ; ~ ' W EL = 8. ' 60LF 15" RCP' ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 0' ST~A~ ~ ~ 2 ose AC 5 14 28 10 STANDARD ®7.43% '~v ~ ~
i ~ i C ,.243 ~ B FF B - , - 0p - - - - TpP--290.50 3 0.63 AC 5 13 26 10 STANDARD
\ I' i , ~ ~ CB #28 EX= 4 ~ INt/-fH~286.84
+ TOP 07.00 "0 V OUT= 4 4 0.28 AC 5 8 16 10 STANDARD I - 303.46 r~ \Rt~,TE \ - - D ` 5 0.43 AC
~ ~ ~ A ~ / 3 -1 _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ P- 1 M w ~ 15 F 18" '~N 5 9 18 10 STANDARD ~ ~ 20 DR>'~NA~E P ~ ~
~ - ~ 1 0 ~ NV 1N , X ~ 1 I ~ ~ 1 lD1 0 i ~ 4. _ EASEMENT . 50 INV UT=2 6. 6 D.ts AC 5 6 12 10 STANDARD - -~TYP~~ + \
~ - - ~ - ~ ~ ~ TRAP ~1~5~ - v` • ~ ~ 7 o.es AC 5 13 26 10 STANDARD _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ u~ o I
~ ~ ~ ~ o - 239 ~ ~ i i~~ ~ ~ / i 0 ~ ~p i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ f l x ~ ~,n ~ 1 7 p~~' ~ ' ' ~ I. I ~ \ ~ ~ a I~ ~ _ ~ EA _ 1.32 AC 5 16 32 10 CUSTOM .
~ ~~T 1 ~ , b SILT EX C.6: ~ - w. ~ „h RiVATE / II ~ ' J 9 0.63 AC 10 ~I TRAP ~24 ~ ; o \ ~ 5 11 22 STANDARD
~ ~ ~ ~ ;ca ~ ~ 3 ~ i i~ I 20' ~Ra~Na~ FENCE ~I ~ ~ ~ i, i II I ~n I 24 ro ~ ~ D ,I, ~I, , I 2+ y y y, 10 0.44 AC 5 9 19 10 STANDARD
_,.i .,5 r ~ _ # _ _ _ ~ ~AStMENT ~ CB N yIl ~ 1 ~ - - - \ i ~ a ( Q ~ - , ~ ---II II - t v. A~~_ ~ ~ 11 0.88 AC 5 13 26 10 STANDARD O ~
i - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' I ~ 1 - y ~ / ~ i i i O N ~ ~ ~ i n ~ y C ~ ~ ~ ~ N _ _ ~ ~ II i ~ _ ,t, SILT 12 1.87 AC 5 19 38 10 CUSTOM ~
I ~ r 1 ! ~ % - ~I~ I I - ~ ! i I i ~ , ~ ~'y ' ~ (!l 'm FENC
~ E. 2 ~ ~ ~Iq 0 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I , I ~ : I \ _ 13 0.26 AC 5 7 14 10 STANDARD O Z U I _ ~ >TX C. _ !I II ~ - ~ . I ~ TOP - 295.6 + ~ ~ W Z ~
I I ~ j ~ ~ 19+06 I 0 ~i I ' ~ i I ~ I _ L ~ ~ ~ 1, _ ~ ~ EX .C.B l~, 14 I I i ~ ~ I ~ 0 ~ 0,99 AC 5 14 28 10 STANDARD ~ ~ ~ t4_ i it ~ t~ ~ CON „IS ~ W J r~
CB 71 ~ 18~ LT ~ ~ ~ v I ~ # t, i 1 I ~ • 1~8~.0:~ I i' ' I ~ ON BOX ~ 15 0.17 AC 5 6 12 10 STANDARD ~ _ ~ ~i i ~ ~ ; l/ ~ _ (n ~
~ i, i ~ ~ li ~ i,l I f / I~ cv j I = ' I ~ I . II III I , - j ~ t ~ 1 XIST INV - 2 8 > ~ ; tY W I ~ 16 o.6s Ac 5 12 24 10 STANDARD ~ ~ ~ pPRi'~,~~,TE .,F,'~~N~~,E NEW INV OUT= 1.1~ r _ W ~
~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ I _ I II k I~I~ I II ~ 1 _ a _ . ~tRSE.f7E!v1 i GYP, ~ z rli#~ I ~ , ~ ~ i ~ ~~,1 \ F~~IEUC ~ \ ~ ~ ~ • 17 0.48 Ac 5 10 20 10 STANDARD N ~
v ~ w •i 18 1.62 AC 5 19 38 10 CUSTOM ~ ~
SEEDBED PREPARATION 0 SEEDING SCHEDULE
1. CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL 3 INCHES DEEP OVER 19 0.17 AC 5 6 12 10 STANDARD PERMANENT SEEDING -
N ADVERSE SOIL CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE. SHOULDERS. SIDE DITCHES. SLOPES (MAX. 3:11 2D 0,97 AC 5 14 28 iD STANDARD
DATE 0 2. RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO 6 INCHES DEPTH. DATE TYPE PLANnNC RATE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 21 0.42 AC 5 s t9 1o STANDARD
t.zs Ac ~ AUG. 15- NOV. 1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS./ACRE 1. OBTAIN GRADING PERMIT. 22 5 16 32 10 CUSTOM
L NOTES KEYED TO PLAN 3. REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK, ROOTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING ~ SURFACE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM. ~ t_ ~ NOV. 1 - MAR.1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS. ACRE AND ABRUZZI RYE '(NURSE CROP) 25 LBS. ACRE 2. INSTALL GRAVEL ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY DVERSIONS, SILT FENCING, 23 0,38 AC 5 9 18 10 STANDARD U MAR. 1 -APR. 15 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS./ACRE SEDIMENT TRAPS, OR OTHER MEASURES, AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED
' TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, SEE DETAIL SHEET D-3 _ 4. APPLY AGRICULTU APR. 1B- Jl D RAL LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SUPERPHOSPHATE APR. 16- JUN. 30 HULED COMMON BERMUDAGRASS 15 LBS./ACRE PLAN 24 0.64 AC 5 13 26 10 STANDARD
2 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE PROTEC110N, SEE DETAIL UNIFORMILY AND MIX WITH SOIL (SEE BELOW*). DRAWN 3. CALL 856-6196 FOR ON-SITE INSPECTION BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. 25 0.22 AC 5 7 14 10 STANDARD
a SHEET Q_3.M 5. CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL AWELL-PULVERIZED, FIRM, REASONABLY PERMANENT SEEDING - TO OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. ONCE OBTAINED BEGIN CLEARING NECKED
° UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 TO 6 INCHES DEEP. m 0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSiTRUCTION ENTRANCE, SEE AUG. 15-NO AND GRUBBING.
DETAIL SHEET D-,i 6. SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER LIGHTLY WITH AUG. 15-NOV.i TALL FESCUE 200 LBS/ACRE 4. MAINTAIN DEVICES AS NEDDED. ROUGH GRADE SITE. AND SERICEA IESPEDEZA (UNHULLED, UNSCARIFIED) BO TO 70 LBS/ACRE APPROVED
U SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING. Nov. 1-UAR m ~ TEMPORARY CATCH BASIN'FILTER PROTECTION, SEE Nov. 1-MAR.1 TALI FESCUE 200 LBS ACRE 5. INSTALL STORM SEWER (IF SHOWN) AND PROTECT INLETS WITH SILT AND CERICEA LESPEDEZA (UNHULLED, UNSCARIFIED) so To ~ LBS/ACRE FENCING OR OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN ON TH APPROV GMM
L O a DETAIL SHEET D-3 7. MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH. ?dAR. 1-JUN AND ABRUZZI RYE 25 LBS//ACRE E ED PLAN, MAR. 1-JUNE 1 TALL FESCUE 20D LB5//ACRE BEGIN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. START DATE
~ 8. INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR AtAR. t5-JUi AND SERICEA LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED) 40 TO 5D LBS/ACRE MAR. 15-JUNE 30 WEEPING LOVEGRASS 'p cgs//AC 6. STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP TO FINISHED GRADE WITH
GRAPHIC SCALE TEMPORARY SPOILS AREA, PROVIDE TEMPORARY RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE PLANTING SEASON, IF POSSIBLE, IF STAND •o" PROTECTIVE MEASURES AS DIRECTED BY EROSION SHOULD BE OVER 60% DAMAGED, REESTABLISH FOLLOWING ORIGINAL 15-JUI ANO SCRICEA LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED) 40 TO 50 LBS/ACRE VEGETATION, PAVING, ETC. MAR. 15-JUNE 30 HULLED COMMON BERMUDAGRASS 15 ACRE CODE
a so o ~o so t2o 240 CONTROL INSPECTOR OR ENGINEER. LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEEDING RATES. AND SERICEA LESPEDEZA {SCARIFIED) ao ~o ~o LBS/ACRE 7. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED _ COMPLETELY, CALL FOR INSPECTION BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
jfMPORARY SEEDING
6 PROVIDE BACKFILL OVER STORM PIPE TO ENSURE 9• CONSULT CONSERVATION INSPECTOR ON MAINTENANCE TREATMENT AND JUNE 1-SEP POSITIVE DRAINAGE. FERTILIZATION AFTER PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED. a~ E JUNE 1-SEPT. 1 TALL FESCUE 200 LBS ACRE 8. IF SITE IS APPROVED, REMOVE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, SILT FENCING, REVIEW BY TOWN aF KNIGHTDALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND BROWNTOP MILLET + NURSE CROP) 35 LBS ACRE SEDIMENT BASINS, ETC., AND SEED OUT OR PAVE ANY BARE AREAS. DRAWING
w (IN FEET ) OR SORGHUM-SUDAN HYBRIDS • NURSE CROP 30 LBS/ACRE ALL REMAINING PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES, SUCH AS VELOCITY ( ) DISSIPATORS, SWALE CONSTRUCTION AND RIP-RAP INLET PROTECTION DEVICES This dee(gn has been reviewed for the Town of Knightdale by the NO.
~ ? FIELD LOCATED SWALE/DITCH CENTERLINE. ALL 'APPLY: AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE - 2 TONS ACRE ~ 1 inch = 80 it. a CONTOURS ILLUSTRATED ARE TAKEN FROM AERIAL FERTILIZER - 10-10-10 ANALYSIS T 800-1,000 LBS./ACRE p C CONSULT CONSERVATION ENGINEER OR SOIL CONSERVATION SERNCE FOR undersigned consulting engineer of the Town of Knightdale, and to the ADDRIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR VEGETATION SHOULD BE INSTALLED. best of my knowledge and belief, it conforms to the requirements OF DENUDED AREAS, THE ABOVE VEGETATION RATES ARE THOSE WHICH DO WELL establlahed in the Standard SpeclAcations ai the Town of Knightdale.
c°~ MAPPING AND ARE NOT FIELD VERIFIED. SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS.\ACRE OF 20% ANALYSIS SUPERPHOSPHATE uNt UNDER LOCAL CONDRIONS; OTHER SEEDING RATE coMelNAnoNS ARE PossIBLE. 9. WHEN VEGETATION HAS BECOME ESTABLISHED, CALL FOR A FINAL SITE
T MULCH - 2 TONS (APPROX• 80 BALES) SMALL GRAIN STRAW/ACRE •Nu ANCHOR - TACK WITH LIQUID ASPHALT AT 400 GALLONS/ACRE OR PEF By. Date: •NURSE CROP[TEMPORARY -RESEED ACCORDING TO OPTIMUM SEASON FOR DESIRED INSPECTION BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF PERMANENT VEGETATION. DO NOT ALLOW TEMPORARY COVER TO GROW OVER 12" COMPLIANCE.
EMULSIFED ASPHALT AT 300 GALLONS/ACRE ~N ~ ~ - IN HEIGHT BEFORE MOWING, OTHERWISE FESCUE MAY BE SHADED OUT.
0

I I +
I ~ + + + + + + NOTE:
o I I NCW OR FORMERLY ` 1. ALL STREETS ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE c
o ~ COZART, PROPERTY ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 + + + ~ } + ~ + - 2. ALL OPEN SPACES AND ACTIVE RECREATION AREAS ARE TO BE DEDICATED ° ^ + + +1, + + + ~ ~ z TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
i Q~ ~ I I + + v + + + + ~ F ~I ~ ? ~ w
~ SITE I + + + + + + A ~ 3. THERE IS NO DESIGNATED FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE FOR THIS o 'L u~ ~ + + - + + _ ~ ~ ~ ` ' ` ' ~ PROPERTY. ALL 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARYS SHOWN ON THE PLAN U ~ ~ O ~.l'..
~ I 177.04' Y , ~ I S~~ ~b v' / J~ , H T WR TR IN I S EE S E E DE E M ED BY STMATIN H I HT IN >I E G E G SUS G U.S. I 90 89 Z ~
p r~Rr1ER SST ~7 ~ 1~ J ~ s I R; '~l i i i; ? I ~ ~ i~ b7 1 d5 ~ ~ ~ 9799 SF. ~ ~ 10,667 Sr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I; , ;c•s52 ;F 1 7a,~59 sF ~ ~ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS AND BY o x z ~ I
~ 1i I I ,1 ji 1~ ti li~ '~7YP, ~.BU~'E % ~ ~ w ~ I ~ I ' 93 ~ I ~ ~ *95 *94 F1RE HYA / ' ' < ~ A ATIN H A WAT R PTH C LCUL G E D E D F R R A WAY V RT ~ ~ E S 0 O D CUL E S. ~ 93 I 92 i~ . + I it ' II i ~ ,ABBY, CTYP~ 7 1 \ ~ C ~l (D
_ ~ I ~ I I ~i ~ ~ 96 I f 7 9 I / ~I I I I I I op i 1 _ W I lh O ~ ' ~ ~ ~F ~ ~~~02 I '00 ~ 49 ~ 8.fi50 S.E ~ ,,,550 -,o•. 8,'294 S%. ' 8295 S.F. ~ ~ ~ ~ - s ~r ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ I F~ ~ ~ , S > 4. SEE PLAN AND PROFI H T F R AN A NTI WI I ~ + ,,,044 s_ , ~ ~ LE S EE S 0 L DSC PE PLA NG TH N ~ ~ 3 . ~ r ~ I a,z~5 6F r +r ~ + Aa a I ~ \ i ~8 ' ~ t' ~ ~ THE TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG OLD KNIGHT RD. AND STREET TREE
r.~ 2/~~ i 103 ~ 8~_.Sr , ~ I i, !U4G' ~ 855C I 0 ~ I - i i I ~I 8 64? r. 6 648 S \ - 6.648 F, 1 I C~ ~ O6 4 .F I TR 865. I 1 ~ B 710 I_ S."
I I ~~I ? (n 7 a F a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I , ~ J i-- WATER 9, 66 _ . $642 S. F. 8,6.3 S.F. ! ~ , ~ ~ i ~ _J i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ C PLANTING ALONG STREET 'A' AND 'B'. ALL PLANTING TO BE ~ ~ ~ WAIEP ~ ~ f ~ 88 ~ ~ 01
~ J A D '~^il D Eti I N G TO ~ E I i- J I~ ? ~ ~ wn ! as~sr, ~rn~ ~ ( J _ cE - I ? A7ER RO~w`iGkC AS R't~UIRED ~ I ~ ' ~~EHr( Assn,«r~,~ _ _ ~ ~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. ~ ~ ~ i 84 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 - ~-I 1 ~ = ~ EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN ALL OTHER PHASE ONE BUFFERS SHALL II--55
T ,1 ~1 ~ , ~ ~ - I I I I ~ ~~,~~~~N C. ~NIGN iC~,E ~ _ Y~ 7.n67 ~ v ~ + w i, ~ ~ 1 1 i ,
A~~ID N~T I . ss HIGHWAY g I e• a + - + ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ U N. BE PROTECTED TO MEET THE TOWNS PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. ~ = v I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 o ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 5. THE TYPE B BUFFER ALONG OLD KNIGHT ROAD SHALL BE OWNED AND c
4 I i e• ~ 4 + 1 - ` ; + \ , ~ ~ ~ ~ < , ~ MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. E
I I I - _ I ~ ~ ~aJ ~ ~ + + C~ , ~ ~ ~ 6, ALL UTILITY LINES, OTHER THAN LINES USED ONLY TO TRANSMIT ELECTRICITY c - ~ ~ 7,aza s.F. ~ / i o
tkj~ ~I,~~ I I ~ 1' RSP R APRQI - 'WATER S~ ~ ~ --i v L(J P F` r'I RE V1TH EAR ~ r- I I 2a9~ aass , + . t ~ ; ~ BETWEEN GENERATING STATIONS OR SUBSTATIONS AND THREE PHASE ELECTRICAL ~ ~ Ls~ ~ ~ , o -
AVED ~ I I ~ PBOPQ I ~ -1 ~ RQ~n I ~ ~ i~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 197 248 9,0205. F. 247 246 U I ~ ~ ~ ? ? 193 C20 6.F i ~ 4 246 ~2as 26o w•4a~ ~ ` ~ ~ POWER DISTRIBUTION LINES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND, AND ALL GROUND OR > 2 ~ + ~ 1 l < ~ .2.,,9 s.F. , ; ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ,A SURFACE DISRUPTIONS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION SHALL BE REHABILITATED TO THE w
I '07 1 I I~II~ i 200 ~ ~ 1aa I ~ ~ ,020 S.F I,~ 1 I VICINITY MAP 9,9,3SF 199 198 ,97 ,96 795 ~ , + ~ . ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ORIGINAL OR IMPR V N ITI N. I I / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a2 I ) 0 ED COD 0
I ~ ~I, 7,3,2 6F I i ~ ~ 8,576 S.F. ~ ~ 192 N. T•S. L XI J T~~ ~ ~ ~ v ? 8,702 S.F. 6 577 S.F 8,577 S F. 8,577 S F. I 9,020 S F 9,020 SF ' 9,020 S.F, 9,914 S. h , I ? 8,577 S.F. 9,ozo s.F a,9u s.. ~,73s sF ~ + *27 ! ~ ~ Z ~ 7. SEE RECORD PLAT FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT AREAS. AL OT AR A 7,°z1 s, F. L L E S
J~ 6~ I ~ J 0 R. 0, I ~ I W ~ ~ I + 7z,1o3 s. ' Nra ~ SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. + + + ttrr ~
I ? Lp s-E a-I-I 109 11 ? i ~ I i + + ~ 8. TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE FUTURE PHASES
I 8,572 S.F, I II I ~~il 178 ? I ? 'I_ J + SE ASEM N ~ z57 ~ * 258 *8, ) u% BEGIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED. 10.477 S.r ~ 271 (9
, ~~E~.~u~~~. C~~IC~~.? P,DDITIONA~ I. ~ ~ I ~ - 7.4335. , 179 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , I~ ~ ~ ~ l z56 I ' 7o2v s.F 9s F ~ A IV ~/I I ~ 9 6 6F 92 s . ) Q 9. LL PASS E RECREATION AREAS SHALL BE DEDICATED TO 7,264 S.F~ I ~ . k 270
~ r R. W. ~ ~ I ~ 9,174 S.C ~ ~ 183 ' 109 ~ ? ~ '62 I , ~ I 1F4F1 SPREADER ` ' ~ + ~ i ~ THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. )ER ~ ~~zs5 I ~ ~ k ~ 1.°i 16,;g9 s F ~ Q
I I 180 8,947 5 F. 8,866 >.F. ~ TAL DITCH TO ~RE~ r - 9.570 S. F. i I ` ~ 7,,26 S. F. ~ ~ , ~ t I J ~ ~ 10. ALL STREETS SHALL BE LIGHTED AT THE FOLLOWING STANDARD: .4 FOOT ~ Hra ~ ~ 259 20 AC, PAS
~JA,f~JT~T - 2C• T`rP~ `B' EUF~F~= E,4SEMENT I ~ ~ "s ~ I ,°,5o9sF 784 oAtuairAw Q Y TAKE OFF , ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ 7 V 12.045 S.F / i'( 1 ~V I 4' 4rn ~ ~ ` h ~ CANDLES--MINIMUM AVERAGE MAINTAINED AT GRADE. ~ '1 ~ w~ t~~ ,619 S.F ~ ~ ~ ~ r, < < R CREATI ON ` ~ ~ ± ` 11. SEE RECORD PLAT FOR ACTUAL LOT NUMBERING.
~ ~ ~ ,f.«'% / ~ 1 W T ~ ~ ~ A ERLINE: ~ a J I ~ /E~, ~ I I n° ' ~ ~ ~ ~ / RE~~ v 253 a} .233 S. F. ~ ~ ~ « Y ~ ( + 12. THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION AREAS
I ~ ~ ~ i \ 721 i.F SIZE PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III I I 9s6e sF II 81 ~ ~ P ~ 7,021 S.F V ~i / ~ ~ + IS TO PROTECT HEALTHY VEGETATION AND TO CARRY STORM
~ 67 F ? „ 1 II~~ ~ scs 8 WATERLINE 5,700 L.F. 5,453 L.F. 5 003 L, F. I I I 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ 165 X252 ~ 1 + + + + ~ ~ ~ WATER, THE CLEARING FOR THE INSTALLATI N OF TI ITI ~z52 - ~ x+, 0 U l ES
, I ~ I C I I B'. ? 7,340 S.F. n I ~ i ~ \ w, 9,207 S.F. 6 WATERLIN 1 180 L.F. 1 147 L.F. ` ~ ~ ~ ~ E 454 L.F. 1 I~ i23 ,Ja° s.F. 1 , ~ ~ ~ + + OR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AS GENERALLY INDICATED ON V ~ -
„ ? I / 4 WA 310 L.F. 11. ~ 9,776 6F ~ / TERLINE ~ ~ ~ 251 ~ - ~ " + + + ~ THE APPROVED PLANS IS PERMITTED. ~ ~ +
I I eyes s F i , 7, ~ FIRE HYDRANTS 15 EA. 13 EA. 11 EA, I * ~ F, ~ ~ ' ; 7259 6.F. ~ 61 267 ~ ~ + + 13, APPROX, 37828 ACRES OF PASSIVE OPEN SPACE TD BE DEDICATED TO HOME OWNERS ,,..1sF ~ \ + .,0.4 sF ~ ..,~;,_,K~ + ~ ASSD~ IN PHASE III,
I. I ~I , /7.429 S.F. ~ P G`'( ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ASSY. / / ~ ~ ~ ` e * 60 ~ NOW OR FORN1tRLY 14, ALL ACTIVE OPEN SPACE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN RECORDED AS A PART
I 176 ~ ~ ~ \ s SANITARY SEWER: I , I` ~ / ~ , ~ v7,s3~sF , ~ ~ . ~ ~ + ~ ~ \ ~ 9.60, SF ~ ; AMEN FOWLER PROPERT'~ OF PHASE i.
Q 77 I ~ 7,e76 s.F. / ~ 190 SIZE L.F. L.F. l 2 I ~ 273 z6s FF 293.7 ~ 15, PRIOR TO PLAT APPROVAL OWNER SHALL PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS WHERE a.551 5F. 9,687 SF ~ DB 2391 PAGE 299 , ,
~ 175 7gg 236 S.F. u ~ I ~ e~se~ient ~ ~ ~ REQUIRED FOR STREET YARD AND BUFFER AREAS, A TYPE B BUFFER WILL BE ,~w z62 ~ PIN 1765.03-12-3617 REQUIRED ALONG OLD KNIGHT ROAD PRIOR TO PLAT APPROVAL
12 SEWER 277 L.F. I ~ ,,996 5.F 186 9 ~ „ ~ I \ tea V 8,551 S. F. 8 I ~ ,818 S.F. A ~ 7,299 S.F. 265 / z74 ~ ° o >k 79 16. THE FIRST FLOOR FINISH E VAT N F NY T
8 SEWER 7,923 L.F. 7,737 L.F. 6,817 L.F. I ~ , 1 8.693 sF ~ a 3 LE IO S OR A LOT HAT LIES IN WHOLE OR IN 264 1 ~ z6 Assn, 7, 57s.F.l ~ ~ PART IN A FLOODFRINGE OR FLOODPLAIN AREA SHALL BE GIVEN ON THE FINAL
MANHOLES 45 EA. 45 EA. 45 EA. ~ 125 ~ ~ 9.6286E ~ ~ l ~ ~ Z 1, ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ / , 275 ~ ~ t ~ ~ PLAT, LOTS 191 268 314 ARE GIVEN SUCH FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIDNS, J'8 7 269 I ~ > ;~1 i,0 ~ i 275 8.793 S.F. 7~ ~ I "3,610 ~E 0 , i 1 ~ l
* 174 ~ ~ 9,.83 S.F. T ? S ORM DRAINAGE. ~ / , \ i 187 ~l , s'9n 726 7,299 S.F. A ~ e,793s.F. ~ ~ ~ I ~ 17, THE TYPE B BUFFER LOCATED ALONG OLD KNIGHT ROAD SHOULD BE OWNED AND 263 'w^' > MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION,
as menl ~ 9969 S. F. ? ~ ? SIZE L F. ° l ~ ~ ~ ~r , ; \ ~ ~ ~ _ L_F. L_F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ V ~ ~ 8,196 S. F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / B w~~ ttyp. * 78 1 V J Z
n , V ~ ; ? * 173 ~ ; lS`'~ , 15 R.C.P. 1,934 L.F. 1,484 L.F. 808 L.F. / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~,A r \ ~ r { 18. THE STREET PLANTING REQUIREMENTS ARE ENFORCED AS A CONDITION TO A ~ ~ 3'7 ~ 7x63 sF. 1~ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THOSE LOTS THAT HAVE THIS REQUIREMENT, THE -
n / v ~ ~ ~ 7.192 S. F. / ~ ~ ~ 9,2'. 18 R.C.P. 438 L.F. 116 L.F. O / ~ / , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? , 243 276 ~G4~ s.F. _ Q z 9,298sF ~ ~ r HOMEBUILDER OF EACH LOT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF 1 ~ ) ~
294 L.F. ? ~ ~ ~ , , i ~ ? ,A~• / / n ~ ~ ~ J~ 7V '\V ~ 2 ? F I0,54a S. F. 24 R,C.P. 728 L.F. 276 L.F. 250 L.F. O ~ ~ ~ 7,251 sF ~ ~ ~ ~ }21 I STREET TREES ON EACH LOT ACCORDING TO THE CONSRTUCTIDN PLANS PRIOR TO _ ~w 7 ° ~ O
/ ~ ? 30 R.C.P. 38 L.F. ~ ~ ~ A ~ * 172 244 • ~ ,3~as.- ~ THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,
36" R.C.P. 572 LF, 128 L.F. 1 / ~ / z „3 ~ ~ ,29 9,167 sF ~ 277 * 316
08 L.F. / ~ l „ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 7, ~ ? 42 R.C.P. 172 L.F. ? / ~ / 9,121 S.F. ~3 S.. 322 320 I B, 74 S.F. ~ W L 323 ,736 SF 7,770 SF I~ X11 ~ ,2,5 s.F ~ ~ 4,90 ACRES GREENWAY AND OPEN SPACE TO BE ~
7 ~ t A ~ 7,789 S.F * 270 \ ? 4 „ ~ 22 ~ X22 \ * 32a ~ * 7,425 S. ~ DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE ~ Q
48 R.C.P, 66 LF. 82 L.F. / ~ ~ ~ \ 129 ~ ~ 7,767 s.~ , ,566 S.F. „ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ve '7.59° s.F, \ w o UPON PLAT RECORDATION OF PHASE I 71,604 S, F. FIRE / ~ 325
54 R.C.P. 114 L.F. ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 170 I I ! '1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ' 11 4 F ( Q V 1 trraJ .9 5 s ~ Y ~ + - ~ ~ =z
98 x63 ELLIP, PIPE ~ ~ ! 12, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9.772 sF *202 24, 114 ? ~ / 4 319 ~S ` Q
I CATCH BASINS 49 EA. 28 EA. 22 EA. i ~ ~ 130 ~ 7,622 s.F. ~ 7,749 sF 20 TYPE B / ? I YARD INLETS 2 EA, 1 EA. I J ~ ~ 8,696 SF," 76 0.2D AC, PASSIV O . 301.1E + + 8.287 F. < ~ E r + + + + + ~ RECREATION W
BUFFER EASEM NT--~ ~ - - - E 120 ~ ~ ~ 169 JUNCTION BOXES 2 EA, ? + W U1 = + 1 + + + } + F--+ + + + + + + \ / 268 ~ ~ ~
4 1 \ \ 131 8,702 S,F, * 203 17,45 . . . 1 + ~ + + + + + } } + + + Y 7,534 6.F. * Ol0 ' + 75 ~ ~ l ~ a1 ~ Z + + ~ + PU~LIC + + + ,571 S.F. ` ~ -
I, 4 ? \ 7,279 S.F. Q STREETS: 1 ~ ? ~ + + + + $0' U ITY + + + 7 0 + + + v~+ + 4 + M ~ + + + ~ TYPICAL TEMPORARY - Z
1 ? 119 ~ F \ ~ \ STREETS 8,240 L.F. 4,990 L.F. 5,376 L.F, _ ~ ~ ~ + ti ~ o (p, - O
SID WA K ~ ~ ~ ~ ,69 ~ 204 } E L (5 WIDTH) 6,180 L. F, 4,771 L.F. 5,075 L.F. ~ ,16 ,32 6,,36 sF. ,1,3,9 6F + + + ~I ~ + + + + + 6 CABC CUB-DE SAC ~ ~ 774
w + ~ i ~ + 1t a3 + + + t + + + + + .f + ~ / 279 ~r2o 10,41 S.F. + + + MARKS CREEK n ~ tO.P SE F.F. _ \ V~` i I V J
s , ~ 1n A ~ + + + o ~ ~ ~ ~ H~ - ~ ~ , ~ ~ 179 ~ + + + 1RAP Md ` ll__LLL
~ ~ / ~ ? l 167 + + + + ~ * W ~ I J
~ 111 ~ ~ ~ ~ / 733 8,893 S. F. + + + + + i + P 313 9,60 SF PRIG 1E LN T O 280 8,6a3 S.F. ~ *329 EASE ENi ~ yry T.
i \ ~ 8,563 a.F. (TYP)~ + + + y J ~ mAr s ~ 2 sF * ~ - MARKS CREEK ~ ~ / n
~ - i ~ + + + 237RM S i ? i~ ~ h~~ ~ ~ 166 ? + + ~c 239 I ~ W V / 10,560 S.F. ~ i J L_I__
TOTAL PASSIVE AREA PHASE III - 3.59 AC. N~w ~ _R~Y _ ~ ~ ( 9.339 SF i,,2675F. I ~ PRI~A>~ W.H. F~uLE PROPERTY ~ ~ - - ~ 34 2°' °RniraA F + + + 11,267 S.F. I ~ \ ~ 4 ~ 333 1/ 312 ~ P ~
DB 1C~4 PALL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EASEMENT + 281 I *J28 9.042 S.F. ~tI 9,751 S.F. C / \
_ ~ 14 1 ~ 205 ~ + T F~=, _ 7 ~ ~ 1 ? ~ 23e PAN 1, ~ ~~~4 70 ~~549 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I + t2ov s.F. I 7,077 SF. G 1 8,522 S.F. * 238 I / 1 ~ ~ O I ; \ 7
} + ~ 10 7,653 S.F. ~ y I/ + + - TR A ? 6 ~ 1 ,7 I ,3 7,653 S.F. I L~ ~1 W I II ,887 S.F. _I I~ 1 t~ 4.90 ACRES GREENWAY AND OPEN SPACE -7 I I' 336
S E M BUFFER 12 ~ ~ I~ ~ i ~ , ~ '65 i i I' ~ ~ `~I 3„ ;I i ~ , ~ ~ ,74 sF 1 ~ ~ 1 DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE i ~ i ~ ~ 327 I 1 ~ l; ` ~
I 5 ~ ~ 9,882 SE ~ 1~~, , I i * 137 UPON PLAT RECORDATION OF PHASE I 'I <a2 a,%28 S. F. ~ I ~ F ~ PRIV TE DRAINAGE ' ~ 237 71 F. EASE~E I,( PU iC ~ S
? I~ i ~ ~ ? ~ 206 I 7.4sa s F. 8,6 F , 62 S ~ 334 ~ 20' ALiTY * 12 ~ ~ S 74 4 F. ~ 1 . S S ~ EASE NT7, 63 S.F
CORNER , ____x__~ i 8,550 S F. SET N87'0 ' ~ I ~ I ~ ? QO YV ICI I'~, 164 ~ I 4 F. I ~ 8,0 ~S 375 (TYP) ~ / ~ v 1 755 S.F. ~ ~~2~,
51 O.OO i ~I '35 9,827 5 F NOTE: PER N.C. PLUMBING CODE SEWER BACKFLOW ~ ? 276 310 ~ 326 ~ ~ .g5~ ~ S II F -I II * 7, 236 ~ 8,811 S. F. 7,142 S. F.
1 s ~ I 2m ~ ~ VALVES WILL BE NEEDED FOR T I i ~ I ~ zaeo s.F. CER A N LOTS IN PHASE III. - ~ _ I 283 I ~ 7,667 S.F. 7,480 S.F. ~ 8,767 S,F.
PRIOR T IN A 8,245 S.f. ~ _ 0 ST LLING SERVICES ENGINEER SHALL 20 TYPE B BUFFER EASEMENT I ~
COORDINATE WITH CONTRACTOR T I NTI ~ ~ IU ,63 0 DE FY THESE I, ~ ~ I i I- --1 N 7° I- ~ ~ N
LOTS THAT REQUIRE SEWER BACKFLOW DEVICES. i 17 ~ 127 , 8,663 6F ( ~ * 2)5 2°~ 3pg 9,081 S.F. * 235 ~ l~ 284 8,695 S.F.
EXISTING I H ? 7,,85 s.f MOB LE OME PARK _ ? , 7,464 S, F. 7,785 S.F, 8,626 S.F. ~ / <
i ~ -_J 345 ~ 69 1,7~ 9144 S.F.
34 I LOTS THAT MAY REQUIRE SEWER BACKFLOW DEVICES: ,9 738 162 ?209 234 ~ 344 10,216 S.F. I * I- ~ s. 308 740 341 342 34}
~ ? I 8,640 9.F. 7,J13 S.f. ? 7 447 S.E ? 8,fi06 SE 7,713 S.f. ~ 285 8,052 S. F. 10001 S. F. 8.597 S.F. 8,859 S.F. 8~67J S.F.
74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 I _ ? 8165 S. F. ~ 68 9,144 S.F.
188, 189, 190, 191, 239, 240, 245, 250, 251, 252 EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK I I I I ~ ? I L~ J L~ 2J3~ ~ ~-7I ' 346 * 307 ~
161 I ~ ~ ~ 233 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 267, 268 19 ,39 269 270 271 272 314 315 319 320 321 8,640 sF. I * 2 7.320 s.F I 7.720 S.F. ~ 7,320 S.F. 8,570 S.F. ~ ~ ~
322 744 F I 323, 324, 325, 330 r---_ 286 I ~ 67 / ; 9,110 S.F. ~ C, 8.520 S. F. 339 ~ 352 ~ 351
I I ~ 23? 23~ ~ I ~ 9,327 S.F. 8,34fi S.F. 8,715 S.F. / (f)
I ~ ? 20 ~ 21~ 7.320 S.F, 76D 306 ~ 353 ~ 347 / ~ PUBLIC O I 7.a2o s.F, ~ ~ zo unL~rr 8,520 B.F. 8,011 S.F,
i 140 8,640 S.F. 7,a40 S.F. 9,499 S.F. EASEMENT d, i ? ~ 2B7 ~ ~ ~ 66 (TVp) RLIN G'F MARK'S CREEK IS FRLPERTY LIME f Cr ~i - c - r
- II I I NEW 6 WOOD FENCE I I ----i 2„~ r-- 7,6x7 sF. ~ 9.203 s.F C~~ITERLINE OF CRL~K A~ LLCATtD ~ 3Ja ~ N I ~ ~ I ~ _ I' ~K 35c ~ ~ N * 231 II ~ B .F. ~ n
? I I I~ I ~ i ? 2,2 I I ~ 7.320 S.F. 21 7. F ~ i 1 305 ~ ~ .580 5 8,207 S.F. 1 320 S.. I ~-h ~ (r~
~ i 759 III 7,440 SF. ? I j I 8,640 S.F. I 8512 S.F. 3a9 PRI 65 ~ 28B 10,969 S.F. ~ EAS NN G
141 ? _ V~ 9,022 B.E 9,739 S.F. (iVP 8,347 S.F. 337 354
I ~ ~ ~c 230 230 PRIVATE ~ ~ ~ 9,724 S.F. 20 DRAINA 9,024 S.F. EASEMENT
I 273 8,436 S.F. 22 158 8,476 S.F. ~ ~ 54
SITE PLAN DATA # J 9''°8 SF 8,727 s.F. I I 74z / \ \ 9,870 S.F.
1, EXISTING ZONING - R-7 CONDITIONAL USE I 355
2. TOTAL A R - C EAGE 114.15 ACRES ~ 9,779 S.F. 356 \ I \ ~ 304 \ \ 63
3. TAX MAP DATA; WAKE COUNTY PIN: 1755.04.91.2724 AND 1765.03.01.2808 289 ~ , I ~ 8,058 ~ * 357
4. PROPOSED USE -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ~ ~ I 143 ____J 9,631 S.F. I I ~ \ y 0~ . PRIVA NAGE ~
I 229 ~ I I 5. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT PART OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION _ I 23 I 214 229 I ~ / EASEMENT (Y f~
; I 307 360 ~ \ ~ ~AS~A / / eo ~
6. PROPOSED PHASE III LOTS - 95 ~ ~ ~ I I i I I 29a ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'~~r ~ 359 NEW ER EERMERLY
- ~1 ,5~ 7. MINIMUM LOT SIZE - 7,000 S.F. ONLY WHERE ADDITIONAL RECREATION AREA PROVIDED ~ - ~ I ~ 22B -J J 8, 65 S F -1 , ~ ~ I ~l I I _ ~ 8,'62 SF ANTI~NETTE PCJ~LE PROPERTY 228 i--- ~ ~ \
„ I I THESE LOTS ARE DESIGNATED WITH AN AND AREAS STATED ~v v DB 2276 PAGE 377 z
O I ~ ~ ~ 2, 5 , 2a i ~ I 8. AVERAGE LOT SIZE - 8,750 S.F. ~ ~ ~ I ~ 361 ~ i ~ , EXI I N~ ~ * 6i ~ o 29, I I ~ 370 ~ e,232 s.r. PIN 1765,03-11-2567 ~
o ~ ~ 9. THIS PROPERTY IS TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS o -I I 227 , ~ ~ - - ~ i ___I 227 pf ~ 37, t~ >
~ 156 ~ y 10. INSID F ~ ,a5 I E LOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY - NO c -I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ -.l ~i ,
z I ~ ~ z, 6 11. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN A DESIGNATED DRAINAGE AREA 2s Q I 362 ~ ~ ~ ~ 372 ~ ~ ~ I- OAD - ~ N ~ I 30 ~ 1 ~ ~
L---- II ~ -1 ~ r-- T OF STREETS = 18,606 L.F. TOTAL) ~ I ;46 I i ~ ~ - , , 226 292 ,I ~ ~ I fr
- J i 13. AREA IN RIGHT-OF-WAY = 22.28 AC. T NUW ER FORMERLY _ I ~ I , 5 - ~ ~ ~ I ~ I-- 226 III ~ _ ~ ~ ~ I
(OTAL) I - s 21 - ~ I ~ ` ~ ~ I 7 373 ~ i 363 ~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ I •
14. AREA IN GREENWAY - 1.24 AC. KN~TT PARK LTD. PARTNERSHIP ~ 26 I L___ I 300 L. 3fi9 293 I ~ ~ J 60 100 0 50 100 200 400
15. TOTAL OPEN SPACE DEDICATED TO TOWN - 4.90 AC. TOTAL DB 5946 PACE 955 I I 225 I ( ) - T i i I OTAL PASSIVE RECREATION SPACE DEDICATED TO HOMEOWN R - I ~ I- 225 I I ' ' J I / ~ ~ ~ \
E SASSOCIATION 10.19 AC. (TOTAL) PIN 1754,08-89-3386 - ~ I I I I 154 218 ' 16. MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS: I ~ I ~ ~ Ir I 364 \I ~ ~ ~ ~ \
FRONT - 30 I I ~ ~ I~ 299 ~ (IN FEET ) 374 Q
~ I 294 • 375 ~ 59 1 inch = 100 ft. ~ ~ z2a I ~ I ~ 0 ~
REAR - 20 I I ~ ~ z2a r-- I I ~ ~ \ , 0 ~
SIDE - 8' ~ i ~ 2,9 ' I i ~ iae I - > 153 I I 365 366 I ~ LL.i N I ~ L J 367 U
CORNER SIDE 20 28 t I I I 298 ~ ~ ~ Z 5B 295 ~ ~ \ - ~ W
17. LANDOWNER: ' - ' - I 223 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ i
GOWER CONSTRU TIN I I 223 C 0 COMPANY ~ ~ z2o ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I 1 36fi ~ i - A ~ l ~ ~ ~
7324 SIEMENS ROAD 29 ,a° ~ ,52 I ! I ~ I I - ~ ~ ~ ~ A 1 Wo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W I ~ 297 - ~
Q WENDELL, N.C. 27591 J I~ ~ I I o I l i J I 296 I ~ i ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ r I ~ ~ ~ z I rn
° 919 365- 7 7 I ~ 2 ( ) 9 6 ~ - r- ~ -------1 ~ I J ` ~ Nw z ~ ~ f N T R ~ ~ I / / ~i ~ ~ ~ I ~ s7 .E ELI JE
tl] I ~ I ~ ~ I 22! ~ A ~ 18. REGISTERED SURVEYOR: ~ 3° I~ ~ I R~C ~ ,5, I i~- 1 y sa 7 \ Er MARK'S CREEK ~ ` ~ 1i _ I ~ , ~ PRf p ~,TY ~ - - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~V i 1S ~ E~ LINE
m ROBERT T. NEWCOMB & ASSOCIATES P.C. ~ ! I X50 ~ - N , I ' S3 ~ ~ ~ _ _ - - I I ~ ` ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.90 ACRES GREENWAY AND OPEN SPACE
o r ~I 262 W. MILLBROOK ROAD - ~ ~ _ _ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
~ RALEIGH, N.C. 27609 ~ ~ ~ _l _ - ~ - I ~ 52 ~ { 376 C - f ~ ~ .'I UPON PLAT RECORDATION OF PHASE I ~ 5 ~
[phone] ~ ! i ~ - - i_ _ _ - - r-- ~ ~ sa ~ 1 1 r w i ~ 49
~ 48 I ~ / I 1 ~ 47 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 46 ~ ii ~ ~ ~ - , ~ ~ , '
19. CIVIL ENGINEER: - , - 4 45 ~ ~ 55
PAR UER P. ~ ~ ~ ~ a: Q ~ I I az 32 at 36 43 4 ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAWN 4z i i ss ~ l
4926 WINDY HILL DRIVE ~ c O~ ~ 39 ° 3 ~ ~ i ~ I L J 38 ~ ~ , ~ CMK ~ ~ ~ ~ y CHECKED
RALEIGH, N.C. 27609 „ ~ ,i i 'I I ~ DJV
[phone] U ' i APPROVE
fr7 I 33 ~ 35 o ~ _ GMM
a ~ ~ ~ ~ ° y / SwAMP i ~ i ~ ~ START DAT
~ ~ C 4 99
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N~ JOB CODE < ~
a r, I A,~ PC984601A
a~ ~ REVIEW 8Y TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS
E W N89'S6'00"E 1734,24' ~RAW~N~
~ L N This design has been reviewed far the Town of Knightdale by the N0. undersigned consulting engineer of the Town of Knightdale, and to the
3 O C7 NSW DR ECJRMERLY ` best of my knowledge and belief, it conforms to the requirements
T -II ~ established in the Standard S ecifications of the T wn of Kni h I SQUARED ,PROPERTY p o g tdae.
L L DB 2046 PAGE 166 EXISTING CHAI'~'V Lii~~iK EENCE B . Date: Y
~ P:\4601A-EMERALD3\DWG\,C-1.DWG i PIN 175408-99-3532
0

UPSTREAM END OF OVERFLOW N STORM DRNN C
d ~
° 1/3 PIPE ~ X a a DIAMETER N j 00 ~ ~
~ to to LL
8' MAX. ° U _ ~ r 00
V IABL DIR Y THE N a a ~ =~N CO I~ +J
~P~ APO BURY BOTTOM ' ! U ~ U I~ (p A OF PlYW00D % - - _ _ _ - X Z A
R ~~G III ~ G~-~ I I I ~ I ~ r- ' c D]
JO~~ MIN. 10 G MIN. 12 i/2 GA.
P~ / •°~°o•°~ SF LINE WIRES MEDIATE <o ° ° f p~ ! ~ ~ WIRES TERMEDIATE o NOTE: ALL PARTIALLY COMPLETED STORM ORA1N5 3/4' EXTERIOR PLYWOOD ~ ~ RES M t] SHALL BE PROTECTED AT THE END OF IN T PROTECTION ~ ~ N a rY ~ I
. cee~ qN ~ EACH DAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STEEL FENCE PLYWOOD LE ~ _ ~ ~ ~rn DETNLS. POST (TYP.) UPSTREAM END OF ~ N ~ 0)
GRADE ~ STORM DRNN ~ _ OVERFLOW I
o°° ° °a~~o°', e:o°e~O °
15' R. e~:~ ° ~ ~~o ° 0°4 I' ~ ~i 1 c PIP 13 E
i DIAMETER
NCDOT ~5 OR X57 WASHED STONE ~P~ ` ° a • C a vl w N E A PL ° 0 . .
~~Q FRONT VIEW 5 STEEL POST i L NE FlITER m a ° WASHED STO a t
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC IRE FABRIC ACROSS PIPE INLET lil
r SILT FENCE FABRIC ;E FABRIC ~ I - ~ _ - - ~i~ 1 - n- -
- - - 1-1I - I I - - - i iii _ill-III-Il~~r~ III ~:i~ll -~IJIL LA .o,
0 MP RARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT 3 TE O o FILL SLOPE HARDWARE CLOTH • FILL SLOPE E-
PAD TO BE50'LX25'WX8"D MIN. ~ a i
A. NCDOT ~5 OR #57 WASHED STONE SHALL BE USED ~ NOTES: "n GRADE GRADE STONE FILTER INLET PROTECTION
B. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMODATE LARGE TRUCKS IS TO BE PROVIDED. ` NTRANCES SHOULD BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM UTILITY BY ALL CONSTRUCTDN VEHICLES. f C. E - USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRPJNAGE ARE4 _
D. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN I 6' MIN. COVER OVER ' MIN. COVER OVER SKIRT
I T PDRESSING MAY BE NECESSARY. AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW iv OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIOD C 0 FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE ANCHOR SKIRT AS R SKIRT AS 6" GRAVEL FILTER AND S TO N E TION PLYWOOD INLET PROTEC PIPE
E. TEMPORARY PADS MUST BE LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF ADJOINING ROADWAY. FAILURES, USE N0. 57 DIRECTED BY ENGINEER WASHED STONE ED BY ENGINEER OR FILTER FABRIC
FRONT VIEW SECTION A-A
T FENCE DETAIL TEMPORARY S L STANDARD :TAIL NOTES: CONCRETE BLOCK 1. LA IS THE LENGTH OF THE RIPRAP APRON. DEwarERING
2. THE DOWNSTREAM WIDTH OF THE APRON IS EQUAL TO Do+La o ,,oo
IN TALL AMOCO 2006 FILTER FABRIC UNDERLINER OR EQUAL - ~~4,~, ; oo - 3. S _ o
BETWEEN THE RIPRAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION. ~ ` a ¦ ¦ ~
° 4. IN A WELL DEFINED CHANNEL EXTEND THE APRON UP THE °
F "ABOVE THE MAXIMUM ~ CHANNEL BANKS TO AN ELEVATION 0 6 - p
W=Pipe Dia + La D=1.5X1.5 X ~O La = L L SPREADER R PTH OR TO THE TOP OF THE BANK, WHICHEVER IS g TAILWATE DE ° ° ° -r~ °
LEVE PIPE PIPE R 50 In. ° LESS. z CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ~ ~ ~ pr ° -
VEL f s DISSIPATO D slzE cfs FES P CALL AND Q SLOPE ~ SIZE in. L w D - ~ ~ o ° cam-,
1. LAY ONE BLOCK ON EACH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE ~oYO ~ moo ° ~ooo~~ ON ITS SIDE ON THE BOTTOM ROW TO ALLOW POOL -
' 2.04 X 13 = 27 LIN. FEET 0 X 6.75 3 15 3.7212 TEMP 8 X 1 2.04 3A 0.5 DRNNAGE. THE FOUNDATION SHOULD BE EXCAVATED AT L.Fi15T 2 INCH BELOW THE CREST OF THE STORM
' 9X13=117 LIN. FEET TEMP 9 X 11 X 7.875 3.5 DRAIN. PLACE THE BOTTOM ROW OF THE BLOCK AGNNST ~ I I F- OUTLET NO. DD LA W T MATERIAL THE EDGE OF THE STORM DRNN FOR LATERAL SUPPORT p:t SLOPE, GRAVEL FILTER W
0.5 24 5.0905 9 8F ' 3.8 X 13 = 50 LIN. FEET AND TO AVOID WASHOUTS WHEN OVERFLOW OCCURS. I I Z 36 22' 25 18" CLASS 1 STONE IF NEEDED, GNE LATERAL SUPPORT TO SUBSEQUENT W FES # ~
TEMP 8 X 10 X 6.75 3 0.5 15 3.7212 3.656 9A FES #7B 54" 35' 40' 18" CLASS 1 STONE ROWS BY PLACING 2x4 WOOD STUDS THROUGH " BLOCK OPENINGS. WIRE SCREEN O I
' 3.5 4.65 X 13 = 60 LIN. FEET 18 4.2021 TEMP 9 X 11 X 7.87 4.654 22C 0.5 FES #10 15 12 14 18 CLASS 1 STONE U ~ ~ 2. CAREFULLY FlT HARDWARE CLOTH OR COMPARABLE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
' 3.5 6.18 X 13 = 8 0 LIN . FEE T 4.2021 TEMP 9 X 11 X 7.875 FES #12 15 10 12 18 , CLASS 1 STONE WIRE MESH WITH i/2-INCH OPENING OVER ALL POOL FES #18 2-66 20 28' 18 CLASS 1 STONE BLOCK OPENING TO HOLD GRAVEL IN PLACE. DEWATERING m
4 23E 0.5 18 6.18 ' 2.58 X 13 = 40 LIN. FEET FES #198 48" 22 26 18 CLASS 1 STONE 3. USE CLEAN GRAVEL,3/4-TO 1/2-INCH IN
X 11 X 6.75 3 15 3.7212 TEMP 8 2.58 26B 0.5 „ DIAMETER, PLACED 2 INCHES BELOW THE TOP i6' FES #26 2-24 26' 30, 18 CLASS 1 STONE OF THE BLOCK ON A 2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER AND ~ Q Q
' 3.5 4.9 X 13 = 64 LIN. FEET TEMP 9 X 12 X 7.875 18 4.2021 4.845 28B 0.5 FES 30 48" 26' 30 18' CLASS 1 STONE SMOOTH IT TO AN EVEN GRADE. DOT p57 WASHED 1'MIN. STONE IS RECOMMENDED. - -1 I i-
5 7.86 X 13 = 102 LIN. FEET TEMP 13 X 15 X 11.25 .5 24 5.0905 7.86 25F 0 „ _ I,11=I W _ lil-l'~-lll~~~lli-1__l_ - ,-1 I~ I I~ I I I-• ~ I I 1=1 I ~I I ~I I ~1 I ~l I I_ -
' 8.13 X 13 = 105 LIN. FEET X 11 X 7.875 3.5 4 5.0905 TEMP 9 -I I ICI i I- I I=III-1 I ~I I I-1 l i-1 I I_I I ~I I-
24D 0.5 2 8.13 _ > X 1 - LI . ,7 3 -i' II- SEDIMENT i-' - W W
0.5 15 3.7212 3.825 10B I- / V J
~J z Q~
INLET PROTECTION GRAVEL DROP - _
BLOCK AND o ~ z
N TS O
U w w
2'
MIN. z U
~;?~`'i;~, tB'
STEEP CUT OR FILL SLOPE 2:1 SLOPE MAX. ~ ~
FLOW INLET A SUM T TO TOTAL Tc RAINFALL RUNOFF CONTRIB. TOTAL PIPE PIPE ~ Q ~ W ~
FROM TO DRAINAGE MANNING RUNOFF C c - A. INTENSITY cfs INFLOW FLOW DIA. SLOPE VELOCITY TYPE
A A A ROUGH N COEFF. COEFF. (acres) CA STA. TO ST ( ) RE _ W CROSS SECTION
r s mm. mm. (m./hr.) (cfs) (cfs) (m) (ft/ft) (ft/s) acres (n) (C) (ace) ( ) ( ) ( ) z
9 5 5 7.5 1.7212 3.2 4.921 15 0.01 5.2625 SINGLE CB#2 CB#3 0.27 0.013 0.85 0.2295 0.22 5 POSITIVE GRADE 1.0% MAX. ~ W
_ _ n n w ~ r_ n nn~ 4 77 17 FFC, ~
UPSLOPE TOE ~
CB#3 FES#3A 0.05 0.0 13 0.85 0.0425 0 272 5 5 7.5 ~ u'+ u c.v~t i ~ ~ w~ / G 1 L SIDE SLOPES ~
5 8.5 183.6 0 183. 60 0.005 9.3767 SINGLE 2:1(MAX.) ~ ~
FES#7A FE5#7B 36 0.013 0.6 21.6 21.6 5 DESIGN CRITERIA:
RWI SHOWN. , \ ~A\ , A ~A 1. DESIGN FOR 10 YEAR STORM UNLESS OTHE SE ~ ~ , ~ ~
7.5 2.1 0 2.1 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE CB#SA 0.35 0.013 0.8 0.28 0.28 5 5 CB#8 I~ 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5 MIN. AT EACH V ~ \ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~
5 7.5 3.9 0 3.9 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE INLET. A \ ~ \
A CB#8B 0.3 0.013 0.8 0.24 0.52 5 CB#8 5 7.5 5.4 0 5.4 18 0.005 4.2021 SINGLE 3. MANNINGS "n" FACTOR= 0.013. f"" 4 INTENSITY= h+T WHERE =195 AND h=22 AS DERIVED STEEP CUT OR FILL SLOPE W
8B CB#SC 0.25 0.013 0.8 0.2 0.72 5 CB# ,6 6.6 I S 0.005 4.2021 SINGLE • 9/~ ) 9 ` I HINTENSITY-DURATION-FREQUENCY W FROM THE RALE G
0.013 0.8 0.16 0.88 5 5 7.5 6 0 CB#8C CB#8D 0.2 CHARTS. PLAN VIEW
.8 0 7.8 I S 0.01 5.9427 SINGLE 0.013 0.8 0.16 1.04 5 5 7.5 7 CB#8D CB#SE 0.2 RIM ALL CATCH BASIN ~ g 5. ALL YARD INLET TOPS ARE AT ,
0 9 24 0,005 5.0905 FES FES#8F .2 0.013 0.8 0.16 1.2 5 5 7.5 9 TOPS ARE AT TOP OF CURB,
CB#8E 0
7.5 3.656 0 3.656 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE * DESIGN FOR THE 25 YEAR STORM.
FES#9A 0.65 0.013 0.75 0.4875 0.4875 5 5 CB#9
RSION DITCH DETAIL DIVE
. 212 SINGLE .2 3 5 5 7.5 I ,9763 0 1.97 15 0.005 3 7
CB#22A CB#22B 0.31 0.013 0.85 0.2635 0 6 5
5 7.5 4.6538 0 4.653 18 0.005 4.2021 FES CB#22B FE5#22C 0.42 0.013 0.85 0.357 0.6205 5
5 7.5 1.594 0 1.594 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 3 3 0
CB#23A CB#23B 0.25 0.013 0.85 0.2125 0.2125 5 7.5 2.996 0 2.996 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 1 11 I
CB#23C 0.22 0.013 0.85 0.187 0.3995 5 5 CB#23B ,1~1~ GRASS LINING WITH =
5 5 7.5 4.271 0 4.271 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE CB#23C CB#23D 0.2 0.013 0.85 0.17 0.5695 TEMPORARY STRAW 2'-0"
7.5 6.184 0 6.184 I S 0.005 4.2021 FES 0.013 0.85 0.255 0.8245 5 5 CB#23D FES#23E 0 3 NETTING S75/D BY
NORTH AMERICAN
. 2 12 51NGLE 5 5 7.5 1.275 0 1.275 1 5 0.005 3 7 GREEN OR EQUAL ANCHOR FABRIC
B#24A CB#24 0.2 0.013 0.85 0.17 0.17 C A DITCH SECTION 1 PER MANUFACTURER'S MIN.
5 7.5 2.231 0 2.231 15 0.005 3.7212 51NGLE CB# I OA 0.15 0.013 0.85 0.127 0.2975 5 CB#24 CARRY RIP-RAP UP 2' MIN. N,T,S. SPECIFICATIONS
5 7.5 3.825 0 3.82 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE CB# I OA FES# I OB 0.25 0.0 13 0.85 0.2 125 0.5 I 5 TOP OF BERM SIDES OF SPILLWAY ~1~ I ~ ~1 I,
' FR oARD MIN. 3 3 ~~~C
5 7.5 3.094 0 3.094 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE ~'S WASHED STONE i EEB T P NATION Of STORMWATER
A CB#24B 0.55 0.013 0.75 0.412 0.4125 5 CB#24 - 1' ROOD STORAGE 4~r ~ ~ ~~~~/j
5 7.5 5.325 0 5.32 18 0.005 4,2021 SINGLE B#24C 0.35 0.013 0.85 0.297 0.71 5 CB#24B C - (MAX.) ~ ~ ~ ~I - I~;~;, • 1 'MIN. J L%G~~i v 4 n /'~l4 ~ 4(~ vv
5 7.5 8.13 0 8.13 24 0.005 5.0905 SINGLE CB#24C FES#24D 0.44 0.013 0.85 0.374 1.084 5 °w ~ , ' CLASS A STONE ' SEDIMENT STORAGE DEPTH (TOTAL BASIN CAPACITY) 0~ i
D = 6" AMOCO 2006 50 _ 18" THICK FABRIC UNDERLINING
5 7.5 3.06 0 3.06 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 2 0 OR EQUAL
#25A CB#25B 0.68 0.013 0.6 0.408 0.408 5 CB ~ RIP-RAP
5 7.5 4.56 0 4.56 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE DITCH SECTION 2 B• MI". ANCHOR FABRIC BOTTOM
B CB#25C 0.25 0.013 0.8 0.2 0.608 5 CB#25 5 7.5 5.46 0 5.46 I S 0.005 4.2021 SINGLE LENGTH 1' N,T.S. PER MANUFACTURER'S L MI". SPECIFICATIONS
#2 C CB#25D 0.15 0.013 0.8 0.12 0.728 5 CB 5 A
5 7.5 6.36 0 6.36 I S 0.005 4.2021 SINGLE 2 D CB#25E 0.15 0.013 0.8 0.12 0.848 5 CB# 5 ,111, ,111,
5 7.5 7.86 0 7.86 24 0.005 5.0905 FES 2 E FES#25F 0.25 0.013 0.8 0.2 1.048 5 CB# 5 MAXIMUM LEVEL Of SEDIMENT COLLECTED Z
CLEAN BASIN WHEN THIS LEVEL IS REACHED 3 3 ~ 1 Q 1 ( ~L/ ~ Q ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ Q
7.5 2.58 p 2.58 15 0.005 3.7212 FES )~ad~~••, aC~ ~ to ~ r~ 1~
FES#26B 0.43 0,013 0.8 0.344 0.344 5 5 CB#26A SECTION THRU BASIN ~ FILTER J~%a ~~;;~a :,;~G-_~,~o~~~`L~a I w ~ ~
A TONE ~ ~~'1~ N rv CLASS S ~ ~ ~J 1'~ 3 ~ ~ D 50 = 6 AMOCO 2006 O Z U I
7.5 1.148 0 1.148 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE .18 0.013 0.85 0.153 0.153 5 5 EXCB EXCB 0 CARRY RIP-RAP UP a' 18" THICK 4'_0" FABRIC UNDERLINING C~ w Z ~
7.5 2.295 0 2.295 I5 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE ° EX B 0.18 0.013 0.85 0.153 0.306 5 5 ° EXCB C SIDES OF SPILLWAY ~ ~ LO OR EQUAL w ~ ~ ,
7.5 2.9325 0 2.93 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE
.I 0.013 0.85 0.085 0.391 5 5 N EXCB EXCB#28 0 5 7.5 3.57 0 3.57 15 0.005 3.7212 SIN L DITCH SECTION 3 ~ w PL w ~ ~ ANCHOR FABRIC w p ~
m 0.1 0.013 0.85 0.085 0.476 5 Q EXCB#28 CB#28A WEIR LENGTH /1 RIP-RAP \ SEDIMENT N.T.S. PER MANUFACTURER'S ~ Z PIT 3 N w QT
7.5 4.845 0 4.845 18 0.005 4.2021 FES o #28B 0.2 0.013 0.85 0.17 0.646 5 5 CB#28A FES _ SPECIFICATIONS r~ ~ ~ I I I I
N t' MIN, fREEB0AR0 EARTH BERM ~II1i 1L -
5 7,5 9.465 4.47 13.94 24 0.005 5.0905 SIN L ~ I I I I I~ 3 Q
I 0 CB# 131 0.62 0.0 13 0.65 0.403 1.262 5 CB# 3 o 10.935 6.27 17.21 30 0.005 5.9070 SINGLE 3 0 ~ I
.2 0.013 0.7 0.196 1.458 5 5 7 5 CB#131 CB#132 0 8 L ~ ~~~~a p5 WASHED STONE N ~ I~~ ~ ~~~i'~ u L
5 7.5 12.435 6,27 18.71 30 0.005 5.9070 IN # 12 CB# 133 0.25 0.0 13 0.8 0.2 1.658 5 CB 3 ~4'~ ~/4 ~ - PERSPECTIVE VIEW ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ w
m .5 13.035 6.27 19.31 30 0.005 5.9070 51NGLE .I 0.013 0.8 0.08 1.738 5 5 7 D CB#133 CB#134 0 - = CLASS 2 RIP-RAP k ~~(~`~1(`~ ~ ~ T,,,J ~ U
5 7.5 14.055 7.995 22.05 30 0.005 5.9070 SINGLE I FES# 135 0.17 0.0 13 0.8 0.136 1.874 5 ° CB# 34 ~ ~ D 50 = 15 AMOCO 2006 42" THICK 5'_0" FABRIC UNDERLINING DRAWN
~FCTION A-A THRU BERM & FILTER OR EQUAL CMK
° 7.5 1.32 0 1.32 15 0.005 3.7212 IN L
129 0.22 0.013 0.8 0.176 0.176 5 5 CB#129A CB# N DITCH SECTION 4 CHECKED DJV
.ry 6l N.T.S. APPROVED
7.5 1.8 0 1.8 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGL I I 0.3 0,013 0.8 0.24 0.24 5 5 3 CB#131A CB# 3 GMM
START DATE
3.15 0 3.15 15 0.005 3.7212 Y INLE 4/99
0.013 0.7 0.42 0.42 5 5 7 5 YI# 130A CB# 130 0.6 m REVIEW BY TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOB CODE
L a PC984601A
1.125 0 1.125 15 0.005 3.7212 SINGLE 0.013 0.75 0.15 0.15 5 5 75 CB# 134B CB# 134A 0.2 NT TRAP DETAIL he PORARY SEDIME f r the Town of Knl htdale b t TEM Thls dell n has been reviewed o g Y 9 NTS undersigned consulting engineer of the Town of Knightdale, and to the DRAWING
5 5 7.5 1.725 0 1.725 15 0.005 3.721 SINGLE ° B# 134A CB# 134 0. I 0.0 13 0.8 0.08 0.23 best of my knowledge and belief, it conforms to the requirements N0.
a C established in the Standard Specifications of the Town of Knightdale.
7.5 7.031 0 7,031 18 0.005 4.2021 FE
- - I ,25 0.013 0.75 0.9375 0.9375 5 5 v FESRW I CBRW 2 E gy; Date: -
w 5 7.5 7.93 I 0 7.93 124 0.005 5.0905 I N L W-2 CBRW-3 0.15 0.013 0.8 0, 12 1.0575 5 CBR
5 7.5 10.931 0 10.931 24 0.005 5.0905 51N L
o - FESRW-4 0.5 0.013 0.8 0.4 1.4575 5 CBRW 3
T P:A4601A-EMERALDS`-,DWG\D-3.D'~NG
0