420001_PERMIT FILE_20171231

F / 31 zz t
(Type of Visit: ,D Com . ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:7ZY413
I Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
C ,$.".8
n 4- Pr 1 SO n 0 4 !
17L Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Scd �� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine C►apaeity
Pop. Wet Poultry
Capacity
op.
C«attle
Capacity
Pop.
We to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
C«urrent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr Poultr
Ca acit
Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons) .
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes FNo
NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - C2 jDate of Inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Z No NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[—]Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
�oo
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes;_N_o❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): L2SG0e— �4
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 8 No NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [:]Yes [:]No ❑ NA NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ETNA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ YesE_15�013 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
�21.D record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZI No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? es ❑ No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes VNo
[3 NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any'YES answers and/or any 'additional recommendations or any other,commentse,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary): ;
1 5& 2 (_0
l�15 � Q 4 pp � . c,�-�. a � l2ecvw Js �v�
Y
J Z,'�,, 4,
IVjz C- 4-o Re rzo woe L SS r teas ► h -� �j,��
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: C) (I _791— L122 or
Date: 3ZI 14 1 (3
21412011

(Type of Visit: U7outine
ce Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: P4j3_( 12--1 Arrival Time: © Departure Time: E�= County:
Farm Name: �(? Ag+ ; Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: G
Certified Operator: siv '� if j
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Region:
Integrator:--=1
l
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wet Aoultry
a er
Design
Capacity
0
Current
Pop.
y 0o
C«attle
DairyCow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
r Will, I
La ers
Design
Ca aci , i
Current
P_o
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes XyNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA [3NE
❑ Yes o [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Z - U Date of inspection: 424 13 t (2__ .
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 6NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ YesI�No❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard in
() ;-t/ 2-`/ ,, S-'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Z No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): rC—SriL,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
gNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
0No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Trans rs Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: Z- - fi Date of Inspection: /31 /L
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes <No
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other comments
Use drawings'of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
p y)•.
I'?/��� �`� ,-� S �a c� /� C� •Jai- (,✓� cz_ n
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
s 4� e---
Phone: `7 g /— y Z e 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: gl / 3 // Z'
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Feb 1010 08:17a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD
[phone] p.1
Fishing Creek Soil and Water 'Conservation District
Halifax County Agricultural Center
359 Ferrell Lane Room 151
Post Office Box 8
Halifax JVC 27839-0008
Phone: [phone] Ext 3
Fax: [phone]
William N (ill) Mann, Jr.
Resource Conservationist Specialist
Email: [e-mail]
Fax Transmittal
Date: Il O
f
Fax Number: Ql�-Jr%�' L/7) ,2(0-3 9
V� Lr-aLJ.,iWV) �4v-;,:)-,
number of pages including cover sheet

Feb 10 10 08:17a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD
[phone] p.2
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier(ID): Late DVI' a L,ca,oah
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker /,2 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design D 6 ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 gallons = ?/6 q2 1.3 gallons
12 ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design P 9U days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design q1 203, 2- ft3
;40 ono d Q f • y ft3
h, actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
!� 000a certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30 days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 01
m. (lines e + k) x line I =
1000
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
PoA (30 Day) V21100 1
3
g6c'S.5 ft3
,a060 —gallons
1, 3 lb/1000 gal.
3)3,'� lb PAN

Feb 10 10 08:17a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD [phone] p.3
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: line m = 313• g lb PAN
2. structure ID: line rn = Ib PAN
3. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
4. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
5. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
6. structure ID: line rn = lb, PAN
n. lines 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 3i?, lb PAN
III. TOTAL, PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s, remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
column r x s
u.
application
window'
F&S
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN avallable for all fields (sum of column 1) _ Y a lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2J21= 2

Feb 10 10 08:18a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD [phone] p.4
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = � / 3, ?' lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (fine v from section 111) = -11Y$'5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = — L/ / 7/, 2 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. 9 animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
J--
33, 6 `r
7—
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00 3

Feb 1510 08:25a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD [phone] p.1
—2�o t Goo �<
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
Halifax County Agricultural Center
359 Ferrell Lane Doom 151
Post Office Box 8
Halifax JVC 27839-0008
Phone: [phone] Ext.3
Fax: [phone]
Fax Transmittal
97Iliam N (Will) Mann, Jr.
Resource Conservationist Specialist
Email: will. mann anc.nacdnetnet
Date:
Fax Number: 9 i 9 - S % ! - 1-171 'K (a - &!::"o 1
'0 Jo Vt i 0— N e-T 1 ©1^ cL / 1rL1/.ti t d N!
number of pages including cover sheet

Feb 1510 08:26a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD
[phone] p.2
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I, TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID). La � a �oT ,OA
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker Z< • 6 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 33- 61 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design ' g6J6 ft,
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 clalion�s = MI6 q2 I.3 gallons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design / TfU days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design ql 203. 2- ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 2 00;z 1- y ft3
�,obo certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design Z q b SAS. 5 ft3
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30 days = a'f a�0 gallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 0� D q i, 3 Ib11000 gal.
m. (lines e + k) x line 1 = 3 ) 3, `t lb PAN
1000
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 1

Feb 1510 08:26a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD
[phone] p,3
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
2.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
structure. ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
6.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.
lines9+2+3+4+5+6
lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
13ALANCE
FOR FIELD
(lbs.)
column r x s
u.
application
window'
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 2

Feb 1510 08:26a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD [phone] p.4
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) _ 31 / 3. ?-' lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) _ -lV875 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = '-/ / 7 /, 2 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
Included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 3

(Type of Visit iO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of visit: t7 Time:
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
'p"Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operate or ove Threshold: .............
FarmName: 11M................................................................. County:.. /...........................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ........................................................................ ........ ..........................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: .................................................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ... 144J........`W5-coc.......................................................... Operator Certification Number:,.220,3. .............
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �' ���
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .CJINO
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ;'�No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes] No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes j No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑.PQo
Struc,tur {{ Structure 2 Str cture 3 A.0
re 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...q� �...... )...... ..... . �... L�' ........ � .. ...................... ......................................................................
I ........
Freeboard (inches): I
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
P'NO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
/5�No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
; o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
o
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
j2l �qo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen, Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type ESQ Cp iV 1,0,E U 4 S G►e
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑Yes
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
['o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes Ko
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yesf/No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
r
OV
o
JW Gyw�/ oKC(07Z)
T'
AyKej �h �{�i L o (,U;�I Div,Q; S r•J
�J_JA S W4T -
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
1L/1L/U.1 Lonanuea

Facility''%Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
P<O
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
T
alysis Soil Samplin
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ W1�
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applica e s ba critl rFd in effect at the time of design?
� Elc
❑ Yes"
_ .-
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
27.
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail discuss
❑ Yes
❑Yes
No
to review/inspection with on -site representative?
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes;/No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ;'No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 'N
�fc
O33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Type of Visit Z Compli a Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: f 0 �;j Arrival Time: 1 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: f'/ 6 4, 1 q a g, Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /' ' r (' ' ►F' Sy Ke f Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 7iiU CL 'sL,0-e
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = = Longitude: = o = g = 14
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
a er
�i ❑ Non-Layet j
Other
❑ Other
i
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: tjZ
Date of Inspection I I'D 0'7 dJ
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ _ 0 ct
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ��o❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes LI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LiJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes No El NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste -Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect a lotion? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ell Yes No El NA El NE
El Excessive Pon ding Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) F o J- l� 2...r. ��, ��^ 9 ✓� f ..1'
13. Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
I No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
RrNoo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
CoEl NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
�Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
. toquestion#� E�xplamanyYE5 answers and/or; any recommendations or any other comments.
Commen15!niaculu
3* to better expl;, fix krurQ�dixh� t .w. a aGvsi.P:sfi k a�s
s te C,
Reviewer/Inspector Name F , Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: / .+_ « Date:
12128104 Continued

r
Facility Number: — P Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZNo,❑ NA ❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly FreeboarL2�OMinute
[I Annual Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
*,
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
U/ ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
E N ElNA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes
N %"❑ NA
[I NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
El NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional*Commen,`ts and/or:D,rawtn'gs f t �}
12128104

U
Type of Visit IXCompli Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: OF 1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: La Owner Email:
Owner Name: i'U C Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: P'q y
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator: lrY"
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o Longitude: = o = 6 = 11
Design Current
Swine Cn.FjVRPoD7jajjun
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
W ,P,oultry Capacity Population
La er
❑ Non -Layer
sit
Dry Poultry ��
El Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
DesignMroDuRation
Cattle Capacity
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
DischarEes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[INE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El
VVNo�NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
ElYes
El
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104 Continued

f
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection Y a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No - ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes No El NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No .❑ NA [INE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes No El NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence jof Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
/
12. Crop type(s) f Q 6 e/ '-1Gi--
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA
O7NV�'E]
❑ NE
i
NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
No NA
❑ NE
o ❑NA
❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers. and/or any recommendations br any, other comments x ";
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)::' ,:
Reviewer/Inspector Name I__--�-�___ -j Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: S Date: O
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

� 1
Facility Number: Z- Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No 'NA El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [I Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspection�No
eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El NA ElNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes , ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes LQ N NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yesro
NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑YesNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number 1--
�I
Type of Visit
Reason for V
0-Wision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency F.
�pliarfce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 0! r% J Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: G 9— �i �''t Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 17Ay
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
�o
Latitude:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
= « Longitude: = o = d a
66
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
I❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current 'r
Capacity "Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ElNE
[IYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0'NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: p Date of Inspection 07
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes No NA ElNE
❑Yes o ❑NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 0<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre t; notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ��o❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ A ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) (- S�� . �� e r .^ 1.�---
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes N ' EJNA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: S Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection I7/
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
. A
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ YesVN
❑ NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
[INE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
[IYes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
i
o ' NA
[INE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El
o ❑ NA
[INE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than nonnal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

for Visit: Q'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2// 1 a I Arrival Time: Departure Time: -v County: Region:
Farm Name: � �6 j 4 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: !/e 11 _ S 60'
L
Certified Operator: T L✓
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Finish
Design
Capacity
C«urrent
Pop.
Design Current
We, . oultry Capacity Pop.
La er 0 S n
Cattle
DairyCow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
o Finish
DairyHeifer
to Wean
Design Current
D"r, Poultr Ca aci + Po
Layers
D Cow
o Feeder
to Finish
L
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
urke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�yo
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes Now ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?;,
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes fUl ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

ilacili }Number: Z - 0 jDate of inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
"" NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �Q << 0 t� 30 l/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
o NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
o ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? .If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
l
12. Crop Type(s): i'.7G�� h.� %
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[—]Yes
PNo NA ❑ NE
l6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑Yes
NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: y- Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi ?
❑ Yes
" No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facil' ut of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the ropriate box(es) below.
- Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
0 Yes
2 No 0 NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ NA
Coo'
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refet:-to question #) Explafn�anyFY�S answers and/or any�additional recommendations or any -other coinmentsl." �'� �s •'�
Use drawings of facilii to betteir4xp`lain situations (u'se additional pages as necessary):'
On
(,I �s e SI.Cr ✓ V tAS -�
i c av 13
ivo 514dSe 5-a_�-✓.el I�vr 2-00.
C7� Ct)v&fa C.4,C'/j.eh (_ i j -e KP;le!Ls
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l� Cc S lqtj _,z
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9 / j 7q/ Vzo o
Date: 1131
14/2015

2-
Division of Water Qualit y
0111ty iumber_t D Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O'.."Other Agene y
Tjpe of Visit I:O =Khce Inspection O Operation ReOri
ieW O Stcture aluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visite O Complaint O FolloW up O Referral O I:mergeml O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4�= Arrival Time: /D.�n Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ('11'4 V 14 Ar' S ow- JC74 ea-- Owner Email:
Owner Name: I✓ C 0 G Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: �) i� 1rS Grp-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: a o = = Longitude: = ° 0
Design Current --- Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
Layer O 610, VT331jO D
❑ Non -Layer
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder.
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Strictures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZN NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No [;'NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYesrNo
NA [INE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

1
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes No NA El NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ZG 2 l!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;No
NA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes IKI No "❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CropWindow [IEvidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) (3e ✓ #1 h.Qj
q re S kA_eL__ �� � �✓15 ��" ✓�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No . ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No NA
ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, El Yes No NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes o NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
�nts,(relain any Eeand/orkanyt wings of�facility totbetter exp�laingsituations (use additional pages«as�necessaryyc)s '
IffiiRomm
1 1 �i +. a� �,� _ �� _ r. 1 .v ,-_:)e. U;k rt
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 6 L& `Z�� � ( I Phone % L� -t7
t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I b
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: YZI p Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement. If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No A
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facili fail to conduct a slud a surve as re uired b the ermit?
facility g Y q Y P
❑ Yes
;�_No
NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
II II
V)-& 01 _0 a,,) �S 4 c C41i %r941 v'/ iin C1 P ,-+ T cS'I),'� �
�
12128104

X
Type of Visit ;zutinence Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ReasonforVisit 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 ?j Arrival Time: q Tiir—c] Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: C 4"LQ JIM 110— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ID n1 (l 1 C1 --srs 419.E Integrator: L
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = i = « Longitude: = o = i =
46
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
ity Population
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population
Cattle C«apacity Population
n to Finish
❑ La er
y0
% ti�
❑ Dai Cow
n to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dai Calf
er to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
ow to Wean
'❑
D Cow
ow to Feeder
La ers
Non-Dairyow
to Finish
LEFe
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
rs
❑ Pullets❑
Turke s
Beef Brood Cow
❑Turke Poultsr ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
�NoE:] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
El
El Yes
VoEl
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:(Z — Date of inspection 7 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes LEI N NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ONo A ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El YesFNo
o NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yeso A ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[:]Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12.
Crop type(s) f- e S64AjtP ��e r M1 e
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No El NA
El NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
;❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
7 ❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
o ❑ NA
ElNE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
I.et � �/�' I'—cy—,,..sue C p.e Ce�"�X2 �) 0 + C v F= F L-`Z Sr +'
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: ­7 g — V ZJ t7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C-" Date: 7
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 7 Z — G ( Date of Inspection 7 Zc► v
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �NoO NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ON NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N 9 NA ElNE
❑ Yes No ElNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes El No El NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes, ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Addltio iit6Jnjrh nts)and/or Draxwin s ^$ ` , ' ° ;
r,ag �:
t `#, � ..`� o1 f
Lys (Ypp - �--s 1 r^
-� H d
01"
-r�s-�- k �,.�.�-/7 s ; ,r �v�
►- c�
t„"g s ( 2. r
Z- 0-0
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Zl4f r 0
Type of Visit Q Co nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for W Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /2�%�lQl V Arrival Time: (!) 0 C Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ✓1. Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 04 y; G—✓'-ems
Certified Operator: d 1 cal
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: a o = 6 = Longitude: = ° = 1
DesignW@u&Hrt
Design @urren
Design Current
Swine C«apacity
opuration Wet ry
Capacity Population
C«attle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
a er 160,
&r.'a I
Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I
Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poulbry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Stocker
❑ Gilts
El Non-Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
10 Other
I INumber
of Structures.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0<q/IJ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
❑ Yes N ❑ NE
❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: t12— p Date of Inspection I Z Zo
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes;:o�[[31
❑ El NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
El Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections�N�o-
Gather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesPNo/
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
AddMoat Caommenfsand%orDr�awngsc R k
12128104
12128104

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection Li La)
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
❑ Yes �n.No A NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z 30 c
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment;No
rea otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
A El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso ❑ A El
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [I Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box'below. ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 153-7/artkJ4 _5"
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�allo El NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
❑- NA
[I NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElFNo
❑ NA
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Ins ector Name r �x` `� n� �
�;�tt nt.,F .. .,eat zr Phone:
P
Reviewer/Inspector Signature /�j/,c $ �11 1=4� _ Date: // Z7 t 2 171 U
12128104 Continued

'-7 ,
Type of Visit O'Com nce Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �L1 Arrival Time: EE=Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: A - la— Jos.7 d r4 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: -J�✓c' S
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = 0 = i Longitude: = o a 1 = l{
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Population
Wet Poultry Capacity
Population
C«attle
Capacity Population
Wean to Finish
❑ Layer 0
❑ DairyCow
Weanto Feeder
ro
❑Non -La erDai
Calf
Feeder to Finish
El Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
apnoultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
OO ther
❑ Turkey Poults
Number of Structures:
111E] Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �1❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I �O_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VoEl
A ❑ NE
El Yes A ❑ NE
El YesA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued
t.. .

Facility Number: ,. Z — J-
Date of Inspection 2 -1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ YesPU<o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
StructureStructure 6
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Rio NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) r P -C ,,p , t ry►
13. Soil type(s) �
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ElYes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes IQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 � ,—1 Phone: , (� �� �'qz-"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2 ti [ [
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

f
Facility Number: Z — Date of Inspection a+01 It
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ W-Up ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
es ❑ No - NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYesVN�O
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
=Addfional Comments and/or'Drawm's x =E `' :` r * ` , ry`'°k` „;;,'
r /
Page 3 of 3 12128104

1-1-7 _iei v
lType sit: Routiof Visit: -,0 Com ance Inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Vine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: /,{- le ( Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: 1 Integrator:
4�
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
small
Wet P.. ultry
a er
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
pp
Cattle
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dr Ploultrs'
Layers
Design C*urrent
Ca asi ; Po
Dry Cow
Non-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
OO ther
Other
ILIOther
TurKeys
Turkey Poults
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes NNA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesgNo�[3 NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes roE]
A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesA [3NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesA ❑ NE
ofthe State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Numder: a2 jDate of Inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):`
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
PNo
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment
'te at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): [fie
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall InspectioVNo
le ge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faeffl Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA. ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yesg�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels' in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesgN�0
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Il% -�o czj,4-'^t e �,6R/G "g W °-( (4 P73 1h ors
-�f C5 tv-q.54 -4-0 /J r { 1,4 546V\_,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
15A 549-� o� e- ) (
Phone: 7� /� y Zy c-)
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: Z) Com nce Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: / Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: o , Li-- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: o'411i C/ :74 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wet Poultry
La er
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Cattle
Dai Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
-Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Poultr
Layers
Design Current
Ca aci , Po i.
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
NJ
Other
I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page l of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - p jDate of inspection: — —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in).
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
N ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta r at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZN ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Bel ,,, ti j 4L--
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑YesgN�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
VNo NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer tdquestion #): Explain any YES answers, and/or any additional,recommendations oreany othercomiiients „t
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).- ,, t',
C-` ) "44; "..' � may_
40 C� -5,14t C5( e 5" *,-6, e_/ n'k
SPA i�,i its �y
S'C V'-/D :1-- >-, 6e7 4 tA A-( C e,✓1- cam-- w-4" I
0
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: *791—yz 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� �j �. _777Z�
Page 3 of 3
Date: / — 2-t-0, (j-
2/4/2011

17 —i
0
(Type of Visit: /E) Compl' a Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1!%�g-fijjj Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �lad ol � Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
t/,q,/ f C� •p J'6- —e Title:
J
Phone:
Onsite Representative: �tlI e_C3r4 h c j& /1 �/e Integrator:
r
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Wean to Finish
La er
jDairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder.
Farrow to Finish
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Design Current
D_r, P4oultrs Ca aeih ; P,o
La ers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
F
I
113eef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) El Yes Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Kbmber: - O Date of Inspection: — L -=<
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):I t 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Z;,�NodENA
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VN❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
yNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
g
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Z. Date of Ins ection:41—Z_y—tk
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (rd6it6question,#) Explain any;YES ar swers;and/or any additional v6commendations or any; other comments ; t
iioBterez utons e addtionaaesasneesaUse drawin s,'ofm„
G t k4j.. �� V -( f� r 1"o
7
P �.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: '% / ( V Zdb
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (34- S' )-hc 7mi .e , L Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

(Type of Visit: fD Com nce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: j D Departure Time: %/ , h County: Region:
Farm Name: 4Y1 a ra Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
I I Layer
I
I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dr Po_u_Itr ;
La ers
Design.
Ca aci
Current
Po
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
I Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
113eef Brood Cow
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2<0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
�No
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DW R)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
0A
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

F9cili Number: -I Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): (, I 36 1 t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
., N NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes ZIrf7o ❑ NA
❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesVNo NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 21 X
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �P �G��Q, (jGJr .✓� ti r9--
13. Soil Type(s): /
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZN ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the a ro riate box
PP P
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Fdcilit Number: - V Date of inspection: A
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0'�_Nolo NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? []Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesrZNoO[—
o NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[DNA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):,Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other -comments
Use drawings of.facility to better, explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
►� -�R- 4T l IGr/�'�� ivr dJn /3-r� cA� e(Qrc_i�M 2r�-f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 22 'n I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �Je, S ,(Zrbya
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 2_012
Date: 17
21412015

w'
Type of Visit /0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit oRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I Date of Visit:
ermitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name: Ca.l2c�tlru
Owner Name: NC_ C
Mailing Address:
Time: I
rO Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _
County: 4-Lk
Phone No:
Ar
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: I Integrator:
Certified Operator: ��� G`( QIrac2 Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 01 0« Longitude 0• 6 0«
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
N
Other
No Liauid Waste
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
N
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 h icture 3 Structure 4
Identifier: lf� C..
Freeboard (inches): % Z c( Y g.. q sill
05103101
Structure 5
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
El Yes �Ko
❑ Yes (ZNo
Structure 6
Continued

v
Facility Number:.. ; Z.- Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type y
13. Do the receiving crops di er with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal,yyasyp�Iar ement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) j�l Yov
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, w ire�r6Wsis &soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes , No
o
❑ Yes �No
fyes El No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [/No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes [--]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes /5No
El Yes � o
❑ Yes )zNo
❑ YesN
❑ Yes No
El Yes No
❑ Yes' X
O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yeo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
i ..'. :t g,.n 4'.�'` �... -
Comments (refer to question #) * Explain any YES,answers,,and/or-any recommendations o_r any otI r,comments.,
A.w . ,
Use�draw�in°gs of faeiIiW4o better explain situations: (use additional page as" -necessary) Field Copy ❑Final Notes
v k"-
10/004
�����a��
Reviewer/Inspector Name %l.Q (;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 / Continued

Facility Number: Z — 1 1 Date of Inspection 1 Q
Odor Issues ,�(�
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes [[ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? /VP'
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes
o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? Cl Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes N
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes XNo
Additional-Coiriments>and/or nrawings: ,'
O5103101

:;
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit PrIhoutine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 D Time: `• 3Q
Facility Number Z '
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
13 Permitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: ...... ............................................... County:. 1:`..............................................................
OwnerName:...I. '.0 ...: k' :......6-correr&4 ............................................... Phone No:.............................................................................:.
FacilityContact:.......j.�............:.................�./.................................... Title: ....I............................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:...... r..q .. ..1.......................... I .. ....{.J.`.......... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ..................................................................................................... Integrator:
......
rr I, /1
Certified Operator:................1 .. 9lA...............C.r.?ik?! r
t�......................................... Operator Certification Number:.....:....................................
Location of Farm: 666
❑ Swine (poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude " Longitude �• ��
Design .'` Current Design Current'. Design Correct
„Swine Ciilnacifv Pooulahon. P.oWhy Caoaclty. Population Cattle Capacity , Potoulatioa
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present ❑ I[] Lagoon Area JE3Spray Feld Area
1i I ,
Holding,Ponds / SolidtTraps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System €
,..s
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ... ;�-jtu .................. SOco�?da !�..... ...... l ao d.a?) ...............
Freeboard (inches): �%36
5100
Structure 5
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes �*o
❑ Yes O No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? es ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? �'j�"Y❑ Yes 0<0
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application /�
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑'1�
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes / No
12. Crop type Re 1 (301D r %440 , C. , s A4. d a a;wz _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal W ste, Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ����Jd� y(a f
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waSyeS la�alysis &soil sarf�ple reports)
I co
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
000ciencies •w•gre ;mote.• during �his:visit; Yop wiil receive o fu>�•thgt . .
correspondence. about. this visit. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
❑ Yes ;3 No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes
1
❑ Yes
❑ Yes P"N"o
❑ Yes )2190
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes O-N"'o
Xyes ❑— NNo
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes JQ No
❑ Yes /,e No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes )!j'No
uvaaau,�cuw �a:caca av yucawvi n� un�Saaaai;,nuJ auk uaa�nca�:wuaaiva nuJ:►cavia�aucaautauva>, va au] ouaca wauaucuwa= 3Ili, '!! 11 ,3,
Use drawings of facility to better ezplamaituahons (use'additional pages as;necessary)
evo.�.. a, j �r� (�5 ^(may ° 0'1 05 A1.Jcj OrC 5�iow.(c� •►
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Facility Number: y— ( Date of Inspection 2 p Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes r No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ;Ir'N"o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near 'the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ;3/No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 140
5100

ly
IQYRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Fumber Late of Inspection p
Time of Inspection / Z O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
6�ermitted ® Certified Q Conditionally Certified [] Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 1. .A:.(..d'...dSh1.4....�?!.�..''�`....( .f?.'�......................... County: ..... jr:.��>L'4..1.:....................... .......................
Owner Name :................. ...........�.�.... G i1..:Yl..!....t-.............. Phone f f / J.Z S.....-L........A.�` .........
Facility Contact:
..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: .... I...:..... .. f..Q...(....... C..7................ ..(..:.....�L�ir.`,/............ ........................................................................... I.... ................. I........
OnsiteRepresentative: ... V. .l .!.. ......!l................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:......,, /�f/�,. ,......, Mj,Gr7 ........ Operator Certification Number:•,•
Location of Farm:
i
............................................................... .......................... ...
Latitude [-' j Longitude �� •"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca ac�ty Po ulation Poti Capacity ,Population Cattle p
pacrty,;'Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
AtO Layer 1 0 1 1 ILJ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other t rs 1
Total Design. Capacity.
F
Total SSLW
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: I t ( tt
Freeboard(inches): ............... .............0114 'LLB.............................................. ...........................
.�........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes �Io
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
.....................................
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

4 `
Facility Number: IVZ- Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? [:]Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type n h
n.
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Oo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 0150
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes XI -No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? es ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
o yiolaticjris:or deficiencies -were noted• during (his'visit; • Y;oir will-teeeiye fio further ;
correspondence. about. this visiit. ..... -. -. -. -. -. .. .. •. •. .. •. •. .. •. •. • . •. •. •. •. •. •. •. -. •. • ,
r� )6o-7 1'
lo n S le
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes l�o
❑ YesO
�esoNo
❑ Yes o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes I o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes L��O_
El Yes
❑ Yes;
❑ Yes � o
660173 /Zobo717. ;AL
lip i",y l•�n �9,0� �� t„�, s. �Q ��►.s c� e,. �, /
4.,ro S )
_zz Date: ii 7 'L41r4
3/23/99

J�\tE� rFS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
YW REGION 4
o ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
Z3F NO
61 FORSYTH STREET
O
4 PAOle ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
PAP
R 3 0 2009
:j � �i ,
CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 2810 0000 4316 5050 ;� MAY -4 2009
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED -
Mr. Phillip C. Sykes, Farm Manager
North Carolina Correction Enterprises
Caledonia Prison Farm
North Carolina Department of Corrections
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
RE: Letter of Concern
Caledonia Prison Farm
NPDES Permit No. NCA200000, Certificate of Coverage NCA442001
Dear Mr. Sykes:
This is to advise you that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 (EPA),
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DNER) conducted
a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) on the above referenced facility on March 5, 2009.
A copy of the CEI report is enclosed.
Based on the information obtained during the CEI, EPA has concerns regarding the
management of silage that was not addressed in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit or the Nutrient Management Plan. Specifically the concerns related to the
containment of seepage coming from the storage of this silage as documented in the CEI.
Please provide a written plan to address these concerns within thirty (30) days upon
receipt of this letter to Ms. Lisa McKinley at the address on the letterhead and copy
Keith Larick, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Animal Feeding Operations Unit,
2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Permit and the CWA may subject the
facility to enforcement action pursuant to Section 309 of the CWA. This Section provides
for the issuance of administrative penalty and compliance orders and/or the initiation of civil
and/or criminal actions.
Enclosed is a document entitled U.S. EPA Small Business Resources -Information Sheet
to assist you in understanding the compliance assistance resources and tools available to you.
Any decision to seek compliance assistance at this time, however, does not relieve you of your
obligation to EPA nor does it create any new rights or defenses, and will not affect EPA's
decision to pursue enforcement action. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission
Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Mlnimum 30 % Postconsumer)

(SEC) requires its registrants to periodically disclose environmental legal proceedings in
statements filed with the Commission. To assist you, EPA has also enclosed a document entitled
Notice of Securities and Exchange Commission Registrants' Duty to Disclose Environmental
Legal Proceedings.
Please direct any specific concerns you may have regarding these requirements to
Ms. Lisa McKinley at [phone].
Sincerely,
Christopher Plymale, Chief
East NPDES Enforcement Section
Clean Water Enforcement Branch
Water Protection Division
Enclosures: (1) Water Compliance Inspection Report (Form 3560)
(2) EPA Region 4 CAFO Inspection Checklist
(3) U.S. EPA Small Business Resources -Information Sheet
(4) Notice of Securities and Exchange Commission Registrants'
Duty to Disclose Environmental Legal Proceedings
cc: Keith Larick, DNER, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Buster Towell, NCDNER, Raleigh Regional Office �/

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding i.e., PCS
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
N NCA442001 8/ 1 /07 { 2
Remarks
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA-----------------Reserved-- ---------------
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected
Entry Time/Date .
Permit Effective Date
D&B Swine Farm Inc.
1033 Bartholomew Rd.
Enfield, NC 27823
1:10 m 3/5/09
August 1 2007
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
2:50 m, 3/5/09
June 30, 2012
Name(s) of On -Site Representative(s)/TiUe(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Dwight Blowe, Assistant Farm Manager
David Inscoe, Operator in Charge
Other Facility Data (on)e.g., SIC NA/CS, and other
descriptive informs i
112310 Chicken Egg Production
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Titie/Phone and Fax Number
Mr. Phillip C. Sykes, Farm Manager, NCCE
Caledonia Prison Farm, NC Department of Corrections
P.O. Box 67, Tillery, NC 27887
252-826-3821
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection Check only those areas evaluated
x
Permit
Self -Monitoring Program
Pretreatment MS4
x
Records/Reports
Compliance Schedules
Pollution Prevention
x
Facility Site Review
Laboratory
Storm Water
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Operations & Maintenance
Combined Sewer Overflow
Flow Measurement
Sludge Handling/Disposal
Sanitary Sewer Overflow
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists, including Single Event Violation codes, as necessary)
SEV Codes SEV Description
❑❑❑❑❑
❑❑❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 110
igna r Inspector(s)
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
tNam,$)nd
t�f
I o-41
le , it nmental cientist
YW
East NPDES Enforcement Section/CWEB/WPD/EPA
'�
►"404-562-9403,404-562-9729(fax)� ( �
East NPDES Enforcement Section/CWEB/WPD/EPA
Maurice Horsey, Environmental Engineer
404-562-9764, 404-562-9729(fax)
Si t e of Ma�gem nt Q�ie er
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
East NPDES Enforcement Section/CWEBIWPD/EPA 404-
7
Plat
Christopher P , Chief
562-9794, 404-562-9729(fax)
/ v
EPA Forth 3560-3 (Rev 1-06) Previous editions are obsolete.

NPDES CAFO Water Compliance Inspection Report
Date March 5, 2009
Weather Conditions Sunny
Entry Time 1:10 pm
State Inspector(s) Buster Towell, Environmental Senior Specialist II, NC DNER, Raleigh Regional Office,
919-571-4718
1. FACILITY
Facility Name Caledonia Prison Farm
Latitude/Longitude 36016"20.40 N, 77029"07.51" W
Type of Operation Poultry, Layer
Number of Animals 14,000 per house, 3 house
Number of Animals in Confinement 42,000 layers 2145 days or more
Animals have direct contact with Waters 0 no ❑ yes, explain
Nearest Waters Conocohnara Swamp, Halifax River ❑ 303(d) listed, for
25-year, 24 hour rainfall amount for this location 7 — 8.5 inches
25-Year Return Period, 24 hour Duration Precipitation, inches (SCS, 1986):
include source htt://www.Imnoen .com/Rainfa//Ma sIRainfa//Ma s.htm
Description of Facility
3 house layer operation, flush system, 3 tier lagoon
Facility Map
Map 1, Source, Web Soil Survey

7Perlmitber NCA400000 ❑individual 0 general
f Covera e NCA442001 ❑ co available on site
August 1, 2007
Expiration Date June 30, 2012
Number of Animals the Facility is permitted for 60,000 layers,
Compliance Schedule Z no ❑ yes, provide -a brief description
acility has NMP 0 yes
❑ no
❑ copy available on site
0 copy maintained at farm office at another location
❑ the Facility has a nutrient budget
❑ the Facility has an environmental management plan
Prepared by a Certified Planner 0 yes ❑ no
Includes Maps of Production and Land Application Areas 0 yes ❑ no
RECORD4. KEEPING
Inspections of Waste Storage System
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Liquid Systems, Freeboard Records
Z
❑
yes ❑ no ❑ some, explain
not a liquid system
Inspection of Storm Water Controls
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Rainfall
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Records of Manure Transferred Off Site
❑
0
yes ❑ no ❑ some, explain
does not transfer manure off site
Records of Land Application of Manure
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Maintenance Reports
i.e. equipment calibrations
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Annual Reports
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Required Training for Employees
0
yes
❑
no
❑
some, explain
Emergency Response Plan
2
yes
0
no

Soil Sample(s)
0 yes ❑ no ❑ some, explain
Manure Storage Structure(s)
❑ holding pond ❑ clay lined ❑ synthetic lining
Z lagoon (3 tier) ❑ aerobic digestion ❑ anaerobic digestion
❑ clay lined - ❑ synthetic lining
❑
concrete structure
❑
under house structure
❑
manure pack house
❑
manure lot
❑
composting
❑
other
❑ concrete slab ❑ tarp/cover
ulescription or -Dtorage 5iructure(s)
Flush from barn to 3 tier lagoon system, see diagram 1
Designed to NRCS or State Required Standards 0 yes
❑ no
❑ do not know
Sketch or Photo of Manure Management Structure(s)
qE.r' i�G d Y ,.•
�s Prump to fields{` ,
v s+l
r1,
Layer Houses
Flush to first
tier
i
Map 1, Source, Web Soil Survey Photo 1, Source, EPA, pipe between tiers 1 &2, connecting to
tier 3, lagoon in photo show lagoon that effluent is pumped from

Visual .Inspection of Structure(s)
Structure(s) appears to be maintained to state standards
0 yes ❑ no ❑ concerns, explain
Structure(s) appears to be sound
0
yes
❑
no
❑ concerns, explain
Rain gauge installed and maintained
0
yes
❑
no
❑ monitor rainfall by
Structure(s) maintain liquid waste
0
yes
❑
no
'
Banks are maintained
0
yes
❑
no
❑ concerns, explain
Marker is present to gauge freeboard
0
yes
❑
no
Freeboard
0
yes
❑
no
MANURE7.
-
Manure Transferred Off Site ❑ yes
0 no ❑
some, explain
The Facility is following state approved ❑ yes ❑ no *0 some, explain
protocols for transfer of manure 0 does not transfer manure off site
NMP Calculated Application Rates and 0 yes
Areas for Application
❑ no
Manure is Land Applied on Farm 0 yes
❑ no ❑
some, explain
Description of Land Application System
Traveling Gun
The Facility has Adequate Land 0 yes ❑ no
❑ some, explain
Facility has a schedule for Land Application and is
following the schedule
0 yes ❑
no ❑ some, explain
Facility has appropriate setbacks and buffers
0 yes ❑
no ❑ some, explain

Visual Inspection of Land Application Areas
Visited all land application fields.
Sketch or Photo of Application Areas
Facility has 4 fields identified in the permit as application areas for a total of 78.60 acres. The facility uses
field #81, 34.7 acres and field #81, 14.2 acres, to apply all effluent.
Map 2, Source Farm NMP
Mortality Management According to the NMP
❑ burial
21 incineration
❑ rendering
❑ composting
NMP gives specifies location for mortality management 0 yes. ❑ no
NMP specifies management required
Visual Inspection of Mortality Site
Mortality Management On Site
❑ burial
0 incineration
❑ rendering
❑ composting
yes ❑ no
Facility is Manac MortalityAccordingto the NMP _yes 0 no

NMP addresses the storage, handling and management of all chemicals ❑ yes ❑ no
Chemicals stored on site
❑ fertilizer
❑ herbicides
❑ pesticides
❑ cleaning supplies
❑ fuel
❑ veterinary
❑ other 0 no chemicals are stored on site
Method of Disposal of Chemicals
no chemicals are stored on site
Visual Inspection of Chemical Storage
Facility is managing chemicals according to the NMP ❑ yes ❑ no
no chemicals are stored on site
OTHER10.
Waste Generated
Storage Disposal
seepage from silage
Concerns
Seepage from silage stored on site poses was not properly contained and managed. Seepage appeared
to have entered to a nearby channel. Facility management confirmed that the channel leads to a pond
where all pollutants would be contained on sight (see map 2 and photos 1-4).
NO
http://webs
Map 2, Source, Web Soil Survey, identifies the location of the silage

\qb 44V`
\ 1
w5v
, `..+� c h� r�i.'���t �}icy, 7 • , x y N`I `''�k� 4' f
7�y✓'_4i t
� ,:,n'.F"'jy � a�5"$�1a��,ts ,y�hls } r✓ �y '•,d � } -, ,•' I .
�w,,rrwr�i ,'�Ir�•1� .. IO J i ir. •. 4 .
jy •eP .�t •1 A 1 .
vil
� '�1:��3711.�:jyM ,.}y"-"-t7i7ra'jr..pu., yt�t .2 '•O.,o:, ;'• e. c :� ?
f 4 i I l
".rf„l wl 4 �'" h
i.ru 1 N r I l:n y tot t., r F t4r'" T.�9' f ; t, . ''�.t, r as 4Y'e',re. ,La,:'"'°vNn i� t 'h t. F' ' t�ytt , �1 r • 1
l MM r�rf .; 7�CI � r Tr t `t �i:' j 1 t .• �� 1 t .fin ,,,� � -7n w -,
y.. e � � i;� r '�'t.-ryt •d e}.r.. �r » � y. y� ��� r t� F 1 R.e �' +'1'^t � t,���. �� t C. 1 3 .y .� w I�, ,
,�.N+ `' i i'°'�•!`'}S( n �.•9! + `P�,�„S}„ia'r}t fl ,u 1?'"W 1 '`�•.1 TLC"' r h v{-�±a' '�'`!, '7'
?`K 7 +, t r't'#•i i', +) f �il },v:'1 ,i '�.b- ,� .,Sr .(K".f.'Ai'mtit 'r.• +�
+} , o .• �t�T7+
r i i��`�ui �R s it'd 1 rx4t t�'H t� y� re4"y�yr r era ti` 'T 't
j.
:el'tc.�'� •, r �+^,�f��t k ,�� p,,.i�� •fit, 5t/ rS� t'4.' ±�Y 4�.�. _., :, �f ��.,�� ` 'V" � d gi t ' _fit y
I
{+ tr-11e,
{+# yt" ^, 'O� r. � r �' 'S iY r � +., r' �a. � �. "!,�` ' ^P •4` A • YS r §:
ry9>."'4J t Li* - y> .n ' 'i p'-r7,:.�y •ce ' 7 Y , :hs: a�..�.•Y'C �.h}M�» r 1:k� ' r w
i !1
'litj 1`�`'A�Y fit, 1 Y'k y ..t 1 'Sf'C t'','. ' �''`i
:trIIj t ft 1r .„ ,,Svolts
a 4r M 4` t S• 6�r Y r 7' y1� ti4+' lly tY' t r t
C� ��,,�t�-riq.r••� sS.� �', � {. ``7i� r. p^^- +. .. �i ,(o^ tit.;' .7t1 � ' t'. '.t«
+rr ':, '.l,,tp !� '7r ' 1•, !P^rjl�,t`�r I� t i! � p.' t �•. y+,}• J:, �.� a ..0 �~ � �'_
1
GOP t :ti,
DISCHARGES
EXIT INTERVIEW

b
0�wand:;
r
August 1, 2007
NC Department Of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
4216 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, NC 27699-4216
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA442001
Caledonia Prison Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Halifax County
Dear NC Department Of Corrections:
In accordance with your application received on 12/27/2006, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC Department Of Corrections, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste management system in accordance with NPDES General Permit NCA400000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Caledonia Prison Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following wet system poultry annual averages:
Non -Laying Pullets: 0
Layers: 60000
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2012 and replaces the NPDES COC
issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized
and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of
animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP_ and this
COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please. carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. This General Permit contains
many new requirements than the previous NPDES General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience
is a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please
pay careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Animal
Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned to the Division of Water
Ouality by no later than March 1st of each year.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.,
N'or�thtCarolina
,vatura!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet: www,ncwaterauitlity.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
, Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50°% Recycled/10°% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

t
Upon. abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all .current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC O2T .1306, any containment basin, such as . a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General. Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior'to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or .limitations contained in this COC -are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for, information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit NCA400000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File NCA442001

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural. Resources -
Division of Water
Beverly Eaves Perdue - -- = = Charles Wakill
Governor — Director
June 5, 201
+. NC Department Of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
P.O. Box 67 _
Tillery, NC 27887
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA442001
Caledonia Prison Farm -
Animal Waste Management System
- .- Halifax County ---- -_
Dear NC Department -Of Corrections: - -
In accordance with your renewal application received on May 2, 2012, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC Department Of Corrections, authorizing the operation of
the subject animal waste management system in accordance with NPDES General Permit NCA400000.
This COC.shall be effective from July 1, 2012 until June 30, 2017 and replaces the NPDES COC
issued to this facility with an expiration date of June 30, 2012.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Caledonia Prison Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following wet system poultry annual averages:
Non -Laying Pullets: 0
Layers: 60000
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please pay careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. The
Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned to the Division of
Water Ouality by no later than March 1st of each year.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] NorthCarolliina
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.oro Agtum[i ff

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee . must submit ._
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T_011 l(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the'%6oiripliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be, maintained between water. supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may ,result iri the�reyocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition IH.27 of the General Permit, waste application_ shall cease within
four (4) hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical
Storm Warning, or a -Flood Watch associated with -a tropical system for the county in which the -
facility is located. You may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the
Raleigh, NC National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA400000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department _
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File NCA442001

IF
° ,
State of North Carolinaisl�l 4qVJ
Department of Environmental Quali
ty auk , 12016
Division of Water Resources
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application FENR Raleigh k
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) 9h Regional Mce
State General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Caledonia Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: N.C. Dept of Corrections
1.3 Mailing address: P.O. Box I:af 6 7
City, State: Tillery, N.C. Zip: 27887
Telephone number (include area code): ( 252 ) 826 - 5621
1.4 Physical address: 2576 Caledonia Dr
City, State: Tillery, N.C. Zip: 27887
Telephone number (include area code): ( 252 ) 826 - 5621
1.5 County where facility is located: Halifax
RECEIVEDINCDEWWR
AUG 0 9 2016
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest major highway, using SR numbers for state roads): located on dead end of
Caledonia Dr (SR 1 141) North of the town of Tillery and East of the town of Halifax
1.7 Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Day d Inscoe
1.8 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; circle which type' ; li.,
1.9 Facility's original start-up date: Date(s) c, 'facility expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number: 42-1
2.2 Operation Description:
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste
management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ;5 Layer 60000 ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
❑ Wean to Finish (# sow)
❑ Gilts
❑ Boar/Stud
❑ Turkey
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Beef Stocker Calf
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Milk Cow
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 1 of 5

❑ Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 2 of 5

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 223.4 Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): less than 223.4
2.4 Number of lagoons: 3 Total Capacity (cubic feet): 896,665 Required Capacity (cubic feet):
Number of Storage Ponds: Total Capacity (cubic feet): Required Capacity (cubic feet):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or (circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YES or NO (circle one)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map with the location of the
facility indicated;
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for
animal waste operations.
ArmlicaInitials
Vdd--
Dcli-
D/C
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications
3.3.10 A site schematic
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.); please be sure to include any site
evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your
submittal. (Composting, waste transfers, etc.)
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

4.
APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
Dwd%d see e-
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for /L (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to —me as mcopleett%.
SignatureDate
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for Prx4c f FtP—r✓1 (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
r
Signature �G�C-� ` Date �4 _ li
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS PROGRAM
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES REGIONAL OFFICES (9/05)
Asheville Regional WQROS Supervisor Washington Regional WQROS Supervisor Raleigh Regional WQROS Supervisor
2090 U.S. Highway 70
943 Washington Square Mall
1628 Mail Service Center
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Washington, NC 27889
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Beaufort Jones
Chatham Nash
Buncombe
Madison
Bertie Lenoir
Durham Northampton
Burke
McDowell
Camden Martin
Edgecombe Orange
Caldwell
Mitchell
Chowan Pamlico
Franklin Person
Cherokee
Polk
Craven Pasquotank
Granville Vance
Clay
Rutherford
Currituck Perquimans
Halifax Wake
Graham
Swain
Dare Pitt
Johnston Warren
Haywood
Transylvania
Gates Tyrell
Lee Wilson
Henderson
Yancey
Greene Washington
Jackson
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Fayetteville Regional WQROS Supervisor Mooresville Regional WQROS Supervisor Wilmington Region WQROS Supervisor
225 Green Street, Suite 714
610 East Center Avenue
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
Mooresville, NC 28115
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
Alexander Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen Richmond
Cabarrus Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland Robeson
Catawba Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett Sampson
Cleveland Stanly
Duplin
Hoke Scotland
Gaston Union
Montgomery
Iredel I
Winston-Salem Regional WQROS Supervisor
450 Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 6 of 5

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Caledonia Prison Farm
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery, NC 27887
252-826-5621
04-12-2012
This plan has been developed by:
Will Mann.
Fishing Creek SWCD
P.O. Box 8
Halifax, NC 27839
252-583-3481 ext.43
i'
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
�✓� L�G7`Ori 1�?tp �l/S D , to
Signature (owner)
Signature (manage0or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets.the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved .By:
Technica peciali Signature Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2012 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S17
Layer Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 972,120 gals/year by a 60,000 animal
Layer Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility, has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
23944
Incorporated
40107
Injected
.48487
Irrigated
19754
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
23,944
36715
-12,771
1,490,581
-518,461
Year 2
23,944
22213
1,731
901,837
70,283
No
---te: ------In -------s-o-u---rce--- IDb ------e---an-s-----stand-a---rd------,--U ---m------u--se--r--de--------ned----sourc-------.---------------------------------------------------------
, S m-----source--eans--fie
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
3302-A
36.
16.10
12.00
Low
5.0
State-CP
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
3302-A
1 40
15.901
11.90
Low
5.0
1 State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
36
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 ba.
36
N/A
3302-A
41
18.60
13.90
Low
5.0
State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
36
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
36
N/A
3302-A
46
58.50
.43.90
Low
5.0
State-CP
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
3302-A
47
34.20
25.70
Low
5.0
State-CP
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
3302-A
48.
12.70
9.50
Low
5.0
State-CP
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
3304-B
147
24.80
18.60
Low
5.0
State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
35
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
35
N/A
3304-B
164
36.20
27.20
. Low
5.0
State-CP.
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
3304-B
172
13.50
10.10
Low
5.0
State-CP
Fescue Hay .
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
3304-B
189
31.50
23.60
Low
5.0
State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
35
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
35
N/A
3304-B
190
17.70
13.30
Low
5.0
State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
36
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
36
N/A
3304-B
1 192
18.30
13.70
Low
5.0
1 State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
35
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
35
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 298.00 223.40
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/12/2012
PCs Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
Potential Leachin g_:.:
Technical Guidance
2
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>— 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<_ 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Exampl
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391.).
PLAT Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium.
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/12/2012
• PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWR regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWR regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Resources Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 1 1" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name:
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm:
Telephone number: (
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters:
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located
6.5 Map name and date:
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL WQROS SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed)
Date:
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 5 of 5

,. I
North Carolina State University is a land- Department of Crop Science
grant university and a constituent institution
of The University of North Carolina
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
Eastern Gamagrass
Limited data are available on the response of gamagrass to various levels of N and soil types
in North Carolina. However, until further data is collected, the following guidelines may be
used.
1. On sandy textured soils that are well drain or excessively well drained, gamagrass may
yield similar to hybrid bermudagrass at similar PAN rates.
2. On heavy textured soils that are poorly to somewhat poorly drained, gamagrass may
yield 1.5-3 times more than hybrid bermuda
Gamagrass establishes slowly and will not usually produce much harvestable forage during
the establishment year. It is best to allow the growth during the seedling year to accumulate
for most or all season; if it is to be harvested, it should be done after full seedhead formation
on a majority of the plants. Therefore, PAN for the seedling year should be modified
accordingly. Overseeding gamagrass with winter annuals is not currently advised because the
harvesting or grazing management of the winter annual crops during February -April would
be detrimental to the survival of gamagrass. Gamagrass should not normally be harvested or
grazed below 6-8 inches stubble.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay in the
24-36 inch stage of growth, the N rate ranges from 40-50 lbs/ton of dry matter. The PAN rate
for grazed systems must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.
The application window for gamagrass is slightly earlier than for bermuda; gamagrass starts
growing about 3-4 weeks earlier than Coastal bermudagrass and about 2-3 weeks earlier than
Tifton 44. Gamagrass is dormant from frost to March. The last application of PAN in the
summer should be prior to August 31.
Rescuegrass (i.e. Matua)
Rescuegrass is a cool season grass and makes most of its growth from March -June and
September -November. It should receive most of its N during the September -October and late
February through May months. Limited data are available for realistic yields of rescuegrass
on various soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. However, until further data is
collected the following suggestions may be useful
1. On sandy, well drained to excessively drained soils, rescuegrass may yield 1.5- 3 times
fescue, assuming a uniform and dense stand of grass is present.

North Carolina State University is a land- Department of Crop Science
grant university and a constituent institution
of The University of North Carolina
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
2. On wet or poorly drained soils, rescuegrass may yield .75 -1.0 times as much as fescue.
3. On soils where both are well adapted the yields of rescuegrass may be 1-1.5 times more
than fescue,
The above RYE estimates assume that stand density is maintained through natural reseeding
every year. Although rescuegrass is a "perennial" it does not maintain dense, satisfactory
stands unless it is allowed to reseed every year. Even under this management it is likely that
disease will affect one or more growths in some years.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay, the. N
rate is similar to other cool season grasses such as fescue, ranging from 40-50 lbs/ton.
Rescuegrass may also continue some growth in June -August if moisture is available. During
these off-seasons, rescuegrass should not receive more than about 25 lbs N/acre/month. Only
apply 25 lbs N/acre in June -August if the equivalent of 1-inch of water can be applied at the
same time. If the crop does not respond with at least a 1000 lbs of growth within a 3-5 week
period do not make another application until the plants have had the opportunity to use the
previous application.

APPENDIX 1.1A
Animal Waste Application Windows'
For Common Crops Which Receive Animal Waste
These application windows include 30 days prior to planting and greenup of Bermudagrass.
End 30 days before harvest.
Bermudagrass
Small Grain Overseeded
in Bermudagrass
Corn
Cotton
Begin March 1st
Begin October 1st
Begin February 15th
Begin March 15th
End September 30th
End March 31 st
End June 30th
End August 1st
Cucumbers - Direct consumption Begin March 1st (100 % at planting)
- For Processing Begin April 1st End May 31 st
(2 seasons) Begin July 1st End August 31 st
Rye Begin September 1st End March 31 st
Barley, Oats, Triticale Begin September 1st End April 15th
Wheat Begin September 1st End April 30th
Peanuts Begin April 1st End September 30th
Sorghum/ Begin March 15th' End August 31st
Sudan Grass Hay
Soybeans Begin April 1st End September 151h
Tobacco - Flue Cured Begin March 15"' End June 30th
- Burley Begin May 15t" End August 15th
Fescue Begin August 1st End July 31 st
Dates shown represent statewide limits. Planting and harvesting dates vary across the state and from year to year. Actual values
shall reflect site specific conditions and in no case allow application more than either 30 days prior to planting/breaking dormancy
or less than 30 days before harvest. See General Permit for food crops
Mountains — limit N application during June and July / no nitrogen in December and January
Piedmont & Coastal Plain — limit N application during June and July / no nitrogen in Dec and Jan during severe winters.
September 19, 2006

Waste Application Fields
Customer(s): NC CORRECTION ENTERPRISE FARMS
District: FISHING CREEK SWCD
Legal Description: Tract 3304-B
Fields 80,147,164,172,1.89,190,192
Legend
Field Boundary _ Streams
Waste Application Fields
® Wettable Acre Buffer
Date: 4/17/2012
Field Office: HALIFAX SERVICE CENTER
Agency: USDA-NRCS
Assisted By:
State and County: NC, HALIFAX
660 0 660 1,320 1,980 2,640
Feet
A

• - ` /,�. .; �o� g..-+ .; � a. � 1, � �
>ell

S.ails Inventory Report
Page 1 of 2
Soils Inventory report
NC CORRECTION ENTERPRISE FARMS
Tract
Land Unit
Map Unit Symbol
Acres
Percent
3304
CbA
6.3
1 %
3304
AaA
38.1
8%
3304
StA
76.8
15%
3304
CwA
85.5
17%
3304
StB
296.7
59%
Total: 503.4 100%
3304
80
CwA
3.7
14%
3304
80
StA
4.9
19%
3304
80
StB
17.2
67%
Total: 25.8 100%
3304
147
AaA
3.9
16%
3304
147
CwA
8.6
35%
3304
147
StB
12.3
50%
Total: 24.8 100%
3304
164
CwA
1.4
4%
3304
164
AaA
3.9
11 %
3304
164
StB
14.3
40%
3304
164
StA
16.6
46%
Total: 36.2 100%
3304
172
AaA
0.9
7%
3304
172
StB
12.5
93%
Total: 13.4 100%
3304
189
StA
0.4
1 %
3304
189
CwA
6.4
20%
3304
189
StB
24.7
78%
Total: 31.5 100%
3304 190 AaA 11.6 9%
f;1P //�` \1lnr.,,mPntc and CPttinoc\will mann\Mv Customer Files Toolkit\Caledonia Farm 4/19/2012

Sails Inventory Report Page 2 of 2
3304
190
CbA
2
11%
3304
190
CwA
3.3
19%
3304
190
StA
3.7
21 %
3304
190
StB
7.1
40%
Total: 17.7 100%
3304
192
CbA
0.1
1 %
3304
192
AaA
2.4
13%
3304
192
CwA
5.1
28%
3304
192
StB
10.8
59%
Total: 18.4 100%
Total: 671.2 100%
rr,.,.11-+\O 1,,.1... - 17.,,-..,, A/10/')111')

APPENDIX 11.1A
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
DESIGNATION FORM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: y.2 ' County: za'.1
9cieiex*xxxxxxxxicie�Fe'e�cn'e�c9c�Ficxdexxxxicxx��cicxicxx�exx�x�'c��ex���c�'e:E�c�Fdc9c��9c�k
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address N D. E a X (o %
City State NL Zip a -7 $"
Certificate # 03 Social Security #
Work Phon - Home Phone
Signature Date a
acx�'cxirx�xxxaeiex3c�'cdc*xic�ir������xxicx*x��xicicxicxa���k�nkicxxir*�c*�:�c�ede�e*�kk
OWNER
Mailing Address
State
Signature
Zip
City,
Telephone#
Date
ae�eicxxicxiexxxxicxxxx�nt�dr�ex�c���aexic�xx�xxxxrc*x�Y3cxx*��FicaF�'ck9c:6�c�c�ckdedc*
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
DWQ PHONE NUMBERS 1 _vp0 — f(5g' d 3(1K
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 4111
SWCD 2 -3 L#3
NRCS - 3 $ EK�'3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health D artment.
d. Contact CES, phone number2Q50-51ocal SWCD office phone number25�FS_ ant/ ct3
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
25x 58"33�8!t3
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: 1`l.� �f!.�/�'1/O�i�-
b. Contractors Address: d2S"% ,�• e Ai r-i e
c. Contractors Phone: Vo? - 3 ;Z
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: -errs es
b. Phone: a,5a v 8' 3 - 3 y8-/
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Poultry Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Poultry production 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers
(Recommended best management practices
CYGood judgment and common sense
Floor surfaces • Wet dirty surfaces 0 Scrape manure, dust, feathers into collection
(walk aisles) alleys
O Splash boards along upper ends of collection
alleys
O Proper ventilation
Cage manure • Manure -covered surfaces 0 Scrape manure into collection alleys
dropping boards
Manure collection • Partial microbial O Frequent manure removal by flush or scrape
alleys decomposition 0 Frequent checks and maintenance on waterers
and water pipes
Ventilation exhaust • Volatile gases Q" Fan maintenance
fans • Dust D�Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust 0 Vacuum or washdown between flocks
Manure conveyors •
Partial microbial
decomposition
0
0
Keep mechanical equipment in good repair
Remove manure accumulations promptly
Storage tank or •
Partial microbial
O
Bottom or midlevel loading
basin surface
decomposition
O
Tank covers
•
Mining while filling
0
Basin surface mats of solids
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
•
Agitation when emptying
Manure slurry or •
Agitation when spreading
O
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader .
Volatile gas emissions
FrWash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
AAAO - NnvP.mhPr 11
149E nave 1

Poultry Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure • Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on drying O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at . Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing 0 Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation 0 Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
0 Minimum agitation while pumping
0 Mechanical aeration
O Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation MIrrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles , Wind drift O Minimum recommended operating procedure
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
R"'Pump from second -stage lagoon
A TxAnC - T\Tn uPrnhPr 1 1 1 006 nncv- 7

Poultry Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead birds • Carcass decomposition O Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead bird disposal • Carcass decomposition O Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits O Proper location/construction of disposal pits
O Disposal pit covers tight fitting
Standing water • Improper drainage 0 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto Poorly maintained access Q' Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Poultry Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: High Rise, Deep Pit; EBAE 131-88
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: Undercage Flush —Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 130-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry; PS&T Guide No. 19
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From:
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—Poultry Science
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - NnvPmhPr 1 1 1 QQ6 nncrP Z

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids 0 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation O Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders Feed spillage O Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
0 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
A A4TP AT..<.o.Y.l— 1 1 1 nnK ---- 1

6 '.
North Carolina State University is a land- Department of Crop Science
grant university and a constituent institution
of The University of North Carolina
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
Memorandum
TO: North Carolina Certified Technical Specialists
FROM: NC State University Forage Production Workgroup
DATE: July 13, 1998
SUBJECT: Crop Management Practices for Select Forages Used in Waste
Management
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC State University Forage Production Workgroup, a group
comprised of NC State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
There are limited documented research responses of some of these practices on the many
soils and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken the available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestions, the Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes.
Bermuda Overseeded With Cereal Rye and Annual Ryegrass
Currently two types of "ryegrass" are being used for winter overseeding in fields used for
animal waste management. Cereal rye is a winter annual smallgrain that looks similar to
wheat, barley and oat. Annual Eyegrass is a winter annual grass that looks much like tall
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during the winter on bermuda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda yields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combination of bermuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between
1-2 tons more per acre than bermuda growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount
of PAN/acre for the year is about 100 lbs more than bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and
annual ryegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selection.

14 1 ' •
North Carolina State University is a land- Department of Crop Science
grant university and a constituent institution
of The University of North Carolina
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding
rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 Ibs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If rye
growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior
to heading or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get
winter growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less
than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast
on short bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The
seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The
last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass - growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches
height. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass
must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard 9590.

STEADY.STATE LIVE WEIGHT
160000 LAYERS X 4 POUNDS = 240000 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 240000 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.825 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in layers.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = D cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 2.5 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = ERROR cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 48.9 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 41.2 feet
Lagoon size for -normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 7.7
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
320.0 155.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
273.8 108.8
AREA OF MIDSECTION
49600.0 (AREA OF TOP)
29789.4 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
(Lm * Wm) _
296.9 131.9 39161.1 (AREA OF MIDSECTION.)
CU. YD. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
49600.0 156644.4 29789.4 1.283
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 302910.1 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = ERROR CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS•OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE. 320.0 FEET LONG BY 155.0 FEET WIDE

DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
350.6 185.6 65071 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
54.0 feet.
53477 square feet
TOTAL DA 118548 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 240000 SSLW * 0.008 gallon/lb. SSLW/day * 180 days
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 46203.2 cubic feet
6B. Volume of excess water.
This is the amount of excess water usage (see tech. guide 633-83)
Volume = 780 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 18770.1 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) 7.6 inches
Volume = 7.6 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 74685.5 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.6 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 65201.6 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 46203.2 cubic feet
6B. 18770.1 cubic feet
6C. 74685.5 cubic feet
6D. 65201.6 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 204860.3 cubic feet

(ABO
REUIREDVE NORMAL
STORAGE Q
LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
DEPTH OF
= Volume of temporary storage divided by surface
r
Depth required
area of lagoon.
860
204860
cu. ft. / 49600 sq. ft.
Depth required = feet
4.1
Depth required =
.
Normal lagoon liquid elevation =
48.9 feet
4.1 feet
Depth required =
1.0 feet
Freeboard =
54.0 feet
Top of Dam
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE
OF THE D8 ATFEETVATION 54.0
ARE 350.6 FEET BY
8.
SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME 46203.2
6A.
cubic feet
6B. 18770.1
cubic feet
6C. 74685.5
cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 139658.7
cubic feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped
storage divided by surface
water level.
area of lagoon at normal
Depth required = 139658.7
cu. ft. / 49600 sq. ft..
Depth required = 2.8
feet
n od
0 AM
APPROVED BY: 1'9 y a 'd
DESIGNED BY:
DATE: /D// 71�/
DATE:

i
Farm Name: CALEDONIA LAGOON #1
-HdL/Fr4X Date: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
County:
'a)I
v
J-pox/z/)
PRISMODIAL FORMULA
Length =
96 Width = 117
Depth =
8.1 Side Slope(ft/ft)= 1
Volume in Cubic Yards = 2878. 25 = -7 -7, 7/ 3 eu'4f'
11232
sq.
ft.
Mid =
9572.31
sq.
ft.
87.9
lin.
ft. X 108.9 lin. ft.
l� �V
Bottom =
8043.84
sq.
ft.
79.8
lin.
ft. X 100.8 lin. ft.
Prepared By: J P SHERROD

Farm Name: CALEDONIA LAGOON #2
County: PITTFAX Date: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
4-1
x i3gRISMODIAL FORMULA
Length = 314 Width = 127
Depth = 8.6 Side Slope(ft/ft)= 1
Volume
in Cubic Yards =
j,'7'1Top =
39878
sq.
ft.
Mid =
36159.36
sq.
ft.
305.4
lin.
ft.
;r Bottom
= 32588.64
sq.
ft.
296.8
lin.
ft.
11525.28 = 31 1, ► �/a c LIA4
Prepared By: J P SHERROD
X 118.4 lin. ft.
x 109.8 lin. ft.

Waste Application Fields
Customer(s): NC CORRECTION ENTERPRISE FARMS
District: FISHING CREEK SWCD
Legal Description: T-3302-A
Flds 36,38,40,41,46,47 & 48
Legend
Field Boundary _ streams arc
Fid Boundary
oWettable Acre Buffer
Date: 4/17/2012
Field Office: HALIFAX SERVICE CENTER
Agency: USDA-NRCS
Assisted By: William Mann -JP
State and County: NC, HALIFAX
660 0 660 1,320 1,980 2,640
Feet N

11
Waste Application Soils Map
Customer(s): NC CORRECTION ENTERPRISE FARMS
District: FISHING CREEK SWCD
Legal Description: Tract 3302-A
Fields 36,38,40,41,46,47,48
Date: 4/17/2012
Field Office: HALIFAX SERVICE CENTER
Agency: USDA-NRCS
Assisted By: William Mann -Jr
State and County: NC, HALIFAX
Legend
® AaA ❑ CbA N CwA ® StA ❑ StB Field Boundary _ Streams
Waste Application Field
Wettable Acre Buffer 660 0 660 1,320 1,980 2,640
® Feet N
O
v

Soils Inventory Report
Page 1 of 2
Soils Inventory Report
NC CORRECTION ENTERPRISE FARMS
Tract
land Unit
Map Unit Symbol
Acres
Percent
3302
36
AaA
0.5
3%
3302
36
CwA
2.7
17%
33021
36
StB
6.2
39%
3302
361
StA
1 6.71
42%
Total. 16.1 100%
3302
38
CwA
1.1
9%
3302
38
StB
11.5
91 %
Total: 12.6 100%
3302
40
CbA
1.3
8%
3302
40
StB
6.3
39%
3302
40
AaA
8.4
52%
Total: 16 100%
3302
41
CbA
2.5
13%
3302
41
AaA
6
32%
3302
41
StB
10.1
54%
Total: 18.6 100%
3302
46
StA
3.3
6%
3302
46
CwA
13.5
23%
3302
46
StB
41.6
71 %
Total: 58.4 100%
3302
47
StA
2.6
8%
3302
47
CwA
9.9
29%
3302
47
StB
21.6
63%
Total: 34.1 100%
3302
48
StA
0.2
2%
3302
48
CwA
1.1
9%
3302
48
StB
11.4
90%
file://C:\Documents and Settings\will.mann\My Customer Files Toolkit\Caledonia Farm_... 4/19/2012

$oils Inventory Report
Page 2 of 2
Total: 12.7 100%
Total: 168.5 100%
file://C:\Documents and Settings\will.mann\My Customer Files Toolkit\Caledonia Farm_... 4/19/2012

Jyj
y !. /jr. \ W W g'� 1S �: n, j 7yE•J[r , Ar t 10g
1. "�liF'tJ arr \ ,•�'..) A \'.J./S1,( S'''� A,6
'.lt�r4: 11
.
vy,- ,.� ✓,� i } Z�^'}
>1'•r1:' ��.� Fcti Y� c� ,r 1 j \'�` . ny� � ., •: �(f vi�!'� • �,I� `r' � t •I � i�•,t�
- �• i-' T I rtil'4t! ,`+.,tG.,•� .. ` Z '-,r''"� :' S ;. � ,\.V• �' 6 �.i.,l.
XZN
��\ - t�`i ►� � � IY r � 1 W �+ � •' t� {�' kir °1?iN"T'F"' �.r>" f tr .- '+t'i�'/Jie "4.�1 'ti• •�)
}+u W rt i, n K � ,; .� :.�_! • \��.' .::.. �, . � :: ,� + r � •mac ��. •�
t �� t•?' f ti..•..�.Ytry b}YYr••' .ram •.. F1 .,c tT::l
y5jj;s• L}I `
i- �C tJ:! r y1 r✓/� f•'.•a-re'&tb.t +(1':k• s'} !.t�, 1
R�r�1� .+• \ 'y•�/?�,••yY;,,'Y;..�. J'a 'r{kt ��.✓� �i1 Y.:• 'a�i;iii a I
•;= � 1 '•'i � �, s�.k" � f'v s ����;�,� +r� �:ve f c''A �:
/ ! ,oe
a �n �' ��q5 �(�( '•. c t i' I s "f' it/*a r • 4 s �[�� r� t
,:� �... t�+t4/, ,/,l iLJ i.Q�•T",Zri Art �.� . �'Y x.t r r�•fAy�1'Sf'tL'th,' '4i4 t�.�Q • . •i' 'lJ 1�
co1.1 \ ,(, ,n 1 r r t' 2 �. xi I t✓ i s , ff I�+J,r`..:,u
`•:•,� �• 1
F�,p^���\{r 4 x d y
A �` \ - \. Ji '1'y' i��/.. ` �itl t}k. ljC,l. t�,• ` }WF¢� '/ {� 'Ib '�1 -t \ ,�Ji1- J •�4 ,•
` %,� \ ° ' 4 \� 'L�� / ):Y 1^d✓ ft1 V�1 \ `'.S ''•t r� i' j �• `•�-r+''�'1 1inKS. �L„ J'�.'7 t l 1'� 1'T 'v� .
Ai
iz-•:. fit{
Q co
~ f ' �•11 � (�� `''.`° �''}G..� �/ �+ .I��� � __ r `YLt �� �4. `+C�f•';!� y � � { �C'i Pe /-� 1r / f .: ::t -e• , \' I ✓/1�•, i. / �.7�� F•�:�'r i� ir(�l .S, !�c1 ��Ty Jt, a'�i,�'.Y;
✓ f i, �',-:\• � r / ��, • n; F` III c' 1 �, ' .�{y.( •cy. \,\� t �„F-f •a �'1.'> 5 :'." RS � t 3 wi�G'i.;l! ° �,�,,.,,[ i•3i
✓• ,/ :... � •�r.Ry ✓ �•.�. _ �- .'s:.'.•4'I' �• t icl� is +.�s•. La J t i `.,frt:,tra_, ^rd �aayF' �t�-7r4- �n;:'•�
/ _ ' � � .� !. ' �' O r'[t, �: . "t..t,ljlir Cry'. R'i.,+ji1'.:•% j `I'i :.:�ytl: t I. jT� ( '�, r:✓, ; •AAT.1
a'." `„`� ...: � - .�.: �J �F4 'l, p.:h': F, ti• ^1:1�F':. 1 \. 'r•E:
t 1t •%, '•" :�t'�� ��\� ,� �fi`•e-L,t�7.'6s{+'�. c �` , :r Nt. w ,t. � L!'•1 1'•. 5• � F��1£'rt'i�::
C �J� �f! °k• ;� Y 4 �* ! i �i f 1 . iat ( ei v
' • / •, �7 !`•.� 'w' Yd '�l -� t,•1!'M �i.�� ��;sy��t� � � k �, e'I���fi,.:t+`9''�•- r� �'�% i
I a ' �''�� • ' r : • z-��,r,' � cry •w �,.t f �. `,
' � �• 41 �'.� �,' ,'�Im �.��{ �' ,/ ti `:��Iik ,�'�� �, k't}N�� �''.- s`, rr �1.1'yt�✓iJ.7� taj�\ {
� aye, Y• � 'r � i F .
`= 'tt� �. ri: r t' i+f ti f Y'S �l, •x r y L � � '�¢R�,
!i , ♦ G, / �t�F� �, K.. •�''�•Tdap Y '✓, �t ,YS _ ,L ,4 1j.i j✓,,'�•' yJ�yt„'iw tr
/''.., �,. "l� .�,'�• •" - }',>;... F /I 1!. 1 I jl } I .i5• i' �!' �' i wig IV
IV
' /�..'. 4, , `a1c ;"yf• Z ;lily
t .� � � `4.*, � r • rt "' � A% tt i ,i � t �'r� j' �ylr'��, �t';i, � ,� a �•ir � ��` •~- ttn;• d�••.
/ '�-, �` .r�* �• i\,: " s�,..,,.il` ! ) . .f 1•"� 5•ia y r 5 r c „�j r
/ 4S� 4i i �r+1-\'..♦ '� i}. •`FraYryl'f•�yri.(,3 ;A .sty 6y1llr �{•�r.t
? Y�5 'i)•t„,jF I
. �:' � � t tY `�k,:r� .`�t `Br� � ''� �� I' > c� Ps•\f ��� f��� 4 lc ttil� ii7.� �,�
,,; - ,. .. .... .. .5 '..-.`i. �' ., tir p ,�y�y� `' �, '� rFr•� 1,�• �r �' � S+' G Y• y'i+,"+� f{�
\ ti t�� ,• "•�;.: ,.� 'F,B �� t .r�, •K'� �(t��_j �, dlifa I ,i�'I'}�,'�tr �'1� . �1 i r,��.
t r -Etil �'� •'.J ,� ',. Hf. •• � �� > c � ? I a 5tt , h. li
,v 1-�r 5� , "" p ;!y..... - tsY (Ti i p�'y'Vjlri�. !' F,.r'f, L.• : .
- r t 5 f 7 ` � t o i'1.'.'ti%. 1 }, _ 4 F �(1 P ••+Y �jt} '' 1' � j
'� •`i.. �W4 +�.•.`'F� •`,�•��cSai :`� _'<� ; 't R+N'•} } 4�4t1 I' I '�� "' I _ trJ. "r,>•�;k��l..,t�
�Ay,.• •y \ 1� f.:- �d�^4 j' .1•tk. ,3 y ;4:'L.,b. 1 ({ c'ci 41r?:;,
\ '��,,lt . C.�H'. fJ�J \ � �� it l,t 'tArJ '.t t}• [ �x (_.. .mot :1,��A,.f" `7� i Y t:;wl.
rX
,, `s!t'•i� � f.'. � 1 � ,kc.; N•' �Y?.u':�•",� . t T t jF� Ji; � -� •. `5 ti S'
t _ .:;:EN.f ,dm �i -,+��',tkFN,r :.t'=? I;'' Iii►' 11 ..� i" (.
+r_.:. t` � .jk' I �a���tir�,1. 1,� ^,1 ,i! . i'•�� .'�s'��• `. J?: Sr�� X• ��A. r" t r /.�., 9. Ir.(�j 'v,:.I
�`.1, ' . � / �',•• / � .r'.'. �+�-' �.' �•, ,..� "F;1' ' w.l'° rs(o�• �E.., t,f;.�,' ii�Yt��`�> ti:.�� ,,t,`;�jy
-'// 1� � q• ,Y''� {I i•� � .:.. ,� l( •t rK'Y i" � C 5y 4- �! j
�/^ 'r if 'Z:' �. •�"`..'� n •'�'hff',1 •% '�t"�., .lk,� Y. •t_ 1° II �, F_. i t~'�
r r\ • • ::\ 1 " '° . a [..Y y� 1{;+�, i i •,1..•• ' .. � 1( _ '1 S t �l ,���r ♦ �� t` 1
.'�"��,�� F "" }.'J ./7..., e�T' ` �i{ .,1 '. •+•'4�-���. L y •,, .C�d Y {4 �. •�y. 1'
�' lY' t t ��J w i:.!.` .� ��� ��1' `�` {` .i'�slt �'� .�i• 3.' s�r\ f"ift
"+t;: 0 �•t-�'�.y •! %jY.
•.I ':• _'{; , �'�•r.• .... i►t(F r, r ,i y4• r :r. �} � M �
IM
Ex skkre-
wt
y�

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON (LAYER)
LIENTS NAME
COUNTY
TODAYS DATE
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE _>
NUMBER OF LAYERS
TREATMENT VOLUME
(minimum 2.5 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
CALEDONIA FARMS
HALIFAX COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
7ISaO FEET
60000
2.5
0.0 YEARS
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =_____> 320.0 FEET
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =______> 155.0 FEET
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =_________> 48.9 FEET
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__> 41.2 FEET
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION _______________> 41.2 FEET
Depth of Permanent Water 7.7 feet
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES ___________________________> 3.0:1
Permanent Volume Required 675000.0 cubic feet
Permanent Volume Provided 302910.1 cubic feet
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET>
(.i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL
FREEBOARD
Temporary Storage Volume 204860.3
53471 SQUARE FEET
180 DAYS
780 GALLONS (EJ(C C 5 L✓f}7�
7.6 INCHES
6.6 INCHES
1.0 FEET
cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 54.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 350.6 feet Width = 185.6 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation = 51.7 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 48.9 feet

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to- protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied, pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
thetemporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the. maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste. application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. ' Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------------------------------------------•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following'crop note applies to field(s): 164, 172, 36, 46, 47, 48
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Well Drained to Excessively Drained
Adaptation: Not adapted.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 147, 189, 190, 192, 40, 41
Soybeans -Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, highly leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20-May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 -1/2";and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
s25337 . Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2012 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage.Capacity table provides an estimate of the'number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in. the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage CaDacity
Source Name
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Printed: 04-12-2012 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste. shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns.
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a. landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste.
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall'be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there'is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or.after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal. waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways. that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
825337 ' Database Version 3.1 ' Date Printed: 4/12/2012 Specification Page 2

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3302-A
40
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.1.90
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
45 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
01
0
0
0
0
.0
01
0
P Removal
IRating
36 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
-155
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract Field
3302-A
41
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.90
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
- - s_-
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
45 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0.
01
0
P Removal
IRating
36 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
-155
.. 01
0
01
0
0
01
0
Tract
Field
3304-B
147
Req'd Nutrients
171
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
18.60
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
J0
= R
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
201
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
44 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
P Removal
IRating
35 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
-151
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
3304-B
189
Req'd Nutrients
171
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
23.60
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
PP
_
-"
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
44 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
P Removal
Rating
35 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
-151
-10
0
0
0
0
01
0
Tract
Field
3304-B
190
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.30
4/1-9/I5
Supplied By:
P
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
IRating
36 lbs/ac.. ILow
BALANCE
-155
0
01
01
01
0
0
0
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 NMR Page Page 4 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3304-B
192
Req'd Nutrients
171
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.70 1
4/1-9/15.
Supplied By:
T
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
44 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
0
0
[777
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
35 Ibs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
-151
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
825337 Database. Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 NMR Page Page 5 of 5

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. -
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
3302-A
36
Fescue Hay
6.5
0.0
196
None
223
None
3302-A
40
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.5
0.8
52
None
69
None
3302-A
40
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.5
0.0
52
None
69.
None
3302-A
41
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.9
0.0
80
None
99
None
3302-A
41
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.9
0.0
80
None
99
None
3302-A
46
Fescue Hay
6.5
0.0
196
None
223
None
3302-A
47
Fescue Hay
6.5
0.0
196
None
223
None
3302-A
48
Fescue Hay
6.5
0.0
196
None
223
None
3304-B
147
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.5
0.7
46
None
86
None
3304-B
147
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.5
0.0
46
None
86
None
3304-B
164
Fescue Hay
6.5
0.0
196
None .
223
None
3304-B
189
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
-5.9
0.0
48
None
57
None
3304-B
189
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
5.9
0.0
48
None
57
None
3304-B
190
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
6.1
0.0
53
None
54
None
3304-B
190
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
6.1
0.0
53
None
54
None
3304-B
192
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
6.3
0.01
54
1 None
65
1 None
3304-B
192
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
6.3
0.01
54
1 None
65
1 None
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2012 STV Page Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to _
maximize nutrient uptake. :
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be. applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from. each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Apptic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3302-A
36
S17
State-CP
16.10
12.00
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
84.28
0.00
3302-A
40
S17
State-CP
15.90
11.90
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
20
Broad.
155
6.29
0.00
74.89
0.00
3302-A
41
S17
State-CP
18.60
13.90
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
20
Broad.
155
6.29
0.00
87.47
0.00
3302-A
46
S17
State-CP
58.50
43.90
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
308.34
0.00
3302-A
47
S17
State-CP
34.20
25.70
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
180.51
0.00
3302-A
48
S17
State-CP
12.70
9.50
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
66.73
0.00
3304-B
147
S17
State-CP
24.80
18.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
171
0
20
Broad.
151
6.13
0.00
114.03
0.00
3304-B
164
S17
State-CP
36.20
27.20
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
191.04
0.00
3304-B
172
S17
State-CP
13.50
10.10
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
70.94
0.00
3304-B
189
S17
State-CP
31.50
23.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
171
0
20
Broad.
151
6.13
0.00
144.68
0.00
3304-B
190
S17
State-CP
17.70
13.30
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
20
Broad.
155
6.29
0.00
83.701
0.00
3304-B
192
S17
State-CP
18.30
13.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
171
0
20
Broad.
151
6.13
0.00
83.99
0.00
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert. .
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
-tons
Total.Applied, 1000 gallons
1,490.581
r
Y
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
972.1
: =
Balance, 1000 gallons
-518.4
; _
'Total Applied, tons
_ j
0.00
Total Produced, tons
' '
0.00
Balance, tons
' `
0.001
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
-
tons
3302-A
36
S17
State-CP
16.10
12.00
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-.7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
6.00
84.28
0.00
3302-A
40
N/A
State-CP
15.90
11.90
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
20
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3302-A
41
N/A
State-CP
18.60
13.90
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
20
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0:00
3302-A
46
S17
State-CP
58.50
43.90
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
.0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
308.34
0.00
3302-A
47
S17
State-CP
34.20
25.70
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
180.51
0.00
3302-A
48
S17
State-CP
12.70
9.50
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
66.73
0.00
3304-B
147
N/A
State-CP
24.80
18.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
171
0
20
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3304-B
164
S17
State-CP
36.20
27.20
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
191.04
0.00
3304-B
172
S17
State-CP
13.50
10.10
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
7.02
0.00
70.94
0.00
3304-B
189
N/A
State-CP
31.50
23.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
171
0
20
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3304-B
190
N/A
State-CP
17.70
13.30
Soybeans, Manured; Full Season
45 bu.
4/1.-9/15
175
0
20
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3304-B
192
N/A
State-CP
18.30
13.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
171
0
20
1 N/A 1
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
901.84
+'
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
972.12
-`
Balance, 1000 gallons
70.28
'. .
Total Applied, tons
O.OG
Total Produced, tons
- - ---
0.00
Balance, tons
y '
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Nutrient Management. Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be.required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1<
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
. Field
3302-A
36
Req'd Nutrients
173
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
12.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.9 Tons
01-20-12
Manure
173
288
183
48
3
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
61 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
288
163
48
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3302-A
40
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
11.90
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
} -
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
155
258
164
43
3
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
36 Ibs/ac.
Low.
BALANCE
0
258
164
43
3
3
1
-1
Tract
Field
3302-A
41
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.90
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
y
I
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
45 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
155
258
164
43
3
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
36 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
258
164
43
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3302-A
46
Req'd Nutrients
173
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
43.90
8/1-7/31
Supplied By;
Ti
'
-
u
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
3.9 Tons
01-20-12
Manure
173
2881
183
48
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
61 Ibs/ac.
ow
. BALANCE
0
288
163
48
3
3
1
0
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 NMR Page Page 1 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(Ibs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
FFild
3302-A
47
Req'd Nutrients
173
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
25.70
8/1-7/31
Supplied B
PP Y
t
r 1_
+
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.9 Tons
01-20-12
Manure
173
288
183
48
3
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
61 Ibs/ac.
Low .
BALANCE
0
288
163
48
3
3
1
0
Tract
IField
3302-A
48
Req'd Nutrients
173
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.50
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
1
';"
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
3.9 Tons
01-20-12
Manure
173
288
183
48
3
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
61 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
288
163
48
3
3
1
0
Tract
I Field
3304-B
147
Req'd Nutrients
171
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres IAPP•
Period
18.60
4/1-9/15
Supplied BY:
s
._--- --�-
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
44 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
151
251
159
42
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
35 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
251
159
42
3
3
0
-1
Tract
Field
3304-B
164
Req'd Nutrients
173
1- 0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
27.20
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
F .
'
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.9 Tons
01-20-12
Manure
173
288
183
48
3
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
61 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
288
163
48
3
3
1
0
Tract
IField
3304-B
189
Req'd Nutrients
171
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
23.60
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
44 bu.
12-03-10
Manurel
151
251
159
42
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
35 Ibs/ac.
ILow
I BALANCE
I 0
241
159
421
31
3
01
0
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 NMR Page Page 2 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
, Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3304-B
190
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.30
1 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
u0
CROP
Soybeans, Manuted, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
45 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
155
258
164
43
3
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
36 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
258
164
43
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3304-B
192
Req'd Nutrients
171
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.70
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
mIT
3
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
44 bu.
12-03-10
Manure
151
251
159
42
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
35 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
251
159
42
3
3
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
825337 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2012 NMR Page Page 3 of 5

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NC Department of Public Safety
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery, NC 27887
Dear NC Department of Public Safety,
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Ste. JAY ZIMMERMAN
RECEMED/ ' C[_''2-0 nWR Director
July 15, 2016 JUL 2 0 2016'
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
Subject: Requirement for Phosphorous Loss
Assessment
Caledonia Prison Farm
Permit No. NCA442001
Halifax County
This letter is being sent to remind you that your current Animal Waste Management System
NPDES General Permit issued by the Division of Water Resources (Division) requires periodic
evaluation of potential phosphorous loss. Condition IV.8. in the above referenced permit states:
"The Permittee shall perform a phosphorus -loss evaluation prior to application for
renewal of this Permit in accordance with state and federal requirements. This evaluation
must be documented on forms supplied by or approved by the Division and must be
submitted to the Division. Upon completion of the phosphorous -loss evaluation, the
CAWMP shall be updated to include the current risk assessment rating, and submitted to
the Division upon application for renewal of this Permit."
In North Carolina, the Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) is utilized to assess phosphorus
loss risk on a field specific basis. PLAT was developed by NC State University and the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and addresses four potential loss pathways: leaching,
erosion, runoff, anddirect movement of waste over the surface. Each field must be individually
evaluated and rated as either low, medium, high, or very high according to its phosphorus loss
potential. In no case shall land application rates for any field exceed the established crop removal
rate for phosphorus for fields with a "high" phosphorus -loss assessment rating. There shall be no
waste application on fields with a "very high" phosphorus -loss assessment rating.
The ratings for each application field for your facility must be reported to the Division using the
attached certification form along with the updated Certified Animal Waste Management Plan as a
part of your permit renewal application. The PLAT field specific forms must be included with
the certification form and copies shall be maintained with other farm records as required by your
permit.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources ry
1636 Mail Service Center Ralei t, Nurth Carolina 27699-i636 Kc F 17 c,-�"✓; "•^
919 807 6464

NC Department of Public Safety Letter
Page 2
7/15/2016
You are encouraged to contact a certified technical specialist as soon as possible to being the
process of having PLAT performed for your facility's fields. Contact the Division of Soil &
Water Conservation for a list of certified technical specialists at 919-733-2302 or visit
hqp://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/tech/animalwaste.html
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 919-807-6354 or the Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-791-4100.
Sincerely,
Christine B. Lawson, Program Manager
Animal Feeding Operations
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Halifax County Soil & Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. NCA442001)

Fax:[phone]
Jul 28 '04 10:26 P.01/07
I T
Fax
ENTERPRISE FARM
NC CORRECTION ENTERPRISE
POST OFFICE BOX 67
TILLERY, NC 27887
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To; Fromi
Pax: Dates
Phone: Pages:
Re: CCs
❑ Urgent C7 For Review O Please Comment 0 please Reply
•Commenta:
� W�

NOR AWoni Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road RaleiA NC 276(7-6465 (9: 133-2655 Report No: 385 W
Grower: Caledonia Faram Copies To: t nscoe, David r-
PO Boa 67
Tillery, NC 27887
E)w
' Inscoe,Davidste nal yszs eport Farm: PO Boa 67
idlery, NC 27887
7122404 Halifax County
Iggle Info. Results per, million vless odmwwise - :l
swupk zo.N P A: Ca mg S Fe AM Zn Cu B No Cl C
1 TOW 659 72.2 9w W 27.6 31.1 4.64 0.49 1.55 0.16 1.26
R -N
wade Code: 4m
ALP -NO3 Nrt Ali Cd Pb Al Se Y Aff SS ON DM CGB% ALEARaO�
a
DesaVHM. OR-N 197 7.63 x
Um a cNn
Mm
- . -ter' - • Y'Mi. _ -- j?a ,- - V
'y-ipsl
rl se -i tl .,:. E _ ;:5.. - -
�•.
lKlijiw
Sav*k JR- N P K ca mg S Fe AM Zn Ca g ai C
7ata! 542 70.4 966 87.0 22.5 31.7 1.75 0.32 L36 0.09 1.17
IN-N
waste Cede.• -AN4
ALP Na 1, Cd Pb Al Se if pA SS c.7v DM% ccz% dLE(Rgal) �,
vewrfpt". OR-N 109 '7.85
P*WtFy Lapon L avd Urea
Ap
N A05 Aid , Ado iib - 4% W A At S8 M .�th
1rr�+i6oa 2.2 0.94 7.7 0.51_: 013 ; 0.19_ a01 r -0.a1 r ao1 L7 '4
o
ti
rn
0
►J
O

*DA - Division
4300 Reegy Creek
LAemtwy R&SUfts
MonA Weigh, MC 27607-6W
VeO wOon Was otherwise noted)
(9A 133-2655 Grower: Caledonia
Farms Report
NO: t 385 Ply 2 - .
Sam le k&
Sample La.
Wage COAL.
ALP
Dmripft".
Potdiry UWn Liquid
IV
p K Ca MR
s to Mn
zn
ca B
Ato Cl c
row 541
N -#V
-Aff4
-NO3
ORW
I Ova
i 55.4 920 76.7 19.3 25.8 1.14 0.23 0.60 0.11 1.06
AW m Cd A At Se Li PH ss C-AV
D64% Ca% AIE(W)
199 8.08
Rent tda�oas:
Nod" Avs 1e for ftmt
IbWtoNggm
-
Other Memema
ibslfw#&#&=
mWalftsmosad
krig"
N -P205 X20 .
2.2 0.74 74
Ca io- , Afg.- S Ma'
.
0.45 0.11: .0.15 O.Ot 7
Ze Ca 8 No
7 - T - 0.01
-a
AAdsArtCd
1.7
:Fit A! k a I
v i
.1 N)
NCO
I K.)
00
O
O
N>
li

FORM IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrioa:ion Fields Reco;d
For RecordiN Irrigation E-Vants on Different I-;Oids
"Ate"few fs 4
j = _ -
(, .,--- • `• -=
I (sews)
a=_' i. �ze lI =cj iir�;: I i o:at : ' = I Oae z''•co
ina�'-!s
!� (:cde
I
F
r
•
� f
�
I � 1
I
,
I I
l
I
i I
f
I I
I I
I
I
I f
I
i
:.'eather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Goudy, CI -Cloudy, R-Rain, S-SnovdS—I et, W-Wmfy 3!1 �rtL3
Persons ccmplatirg bhe irrigation inspections must initiai to signify that inspections viere competed at least every 120 minuses.
�i
C4
00
A
0
00
..

Form IRR-2
Tract Q
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's, Address
Owners Phone"
_�30Y I Field t
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation_ Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facky Number q.2
laigation Operator 411, �
lfication Operators I
Address - ,G
CD--ratcrs Phone A
x
From Anima! Waste blanagement Plan N
Recommended PAN f o0
Crop Type va r /i2 4 C(R S Loac5ng (lblace} _ (8I ��.5 CD
i
(T) (2) (3) (4) (3) (o) (7 (e) (9) (10) 0 1)
I - Irrigation -
I
I
I
Dale
(mWddlyr)
SarS Time
(hrmiiti)
EndTm:e
(hr:nin)
ictal Minutes
(3)-(2)
;, of Sprinklers
Operatis5
Flow Rate
(gal/min)
Total Volume
(gallons}
(a} x (5) x (s}
Volume Per
Acts+(A)c)
- {� - {A)
i
Waste Analysis
PAN Ib/1000call
(
PAN A owed
p•
arc)
fie) (-)I � t,000
Nitro Ealance'
�
(mac)
I
1
i
I
I I
I
i
1
-I
_-
I
I
I
I
I
I I 1
1
I
I
I I
Crop Cycle Total's
Owner's Signature / Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) G4 C /t ��'�� l�-% Operator Certification T
00
0
A
0
00
0
Ln
0

FORi.1 iRR-1 Lagocn Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Fverns on 0-Iferent Fields
=a rChv^er L/tl .L.���rR �i,f - r ct / •t t. _�:� N
3 9;f -
C�-;razor �i`k i .0 �RP4J�•�� .
irast8
Dale
i C:c?
Fi-au Size
I :;es!
ur^a,60a Time
.". S}prktje:s
I 0oera:ra
CYrratar
I ka!s
"Weaker
Code
'Inspe—Orrs
Sia.-. lima
..
Total'•':r, =s
lWO
I
I
I I
I I
1
1
I
I
I
-
�
f I
i I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
•I
I
I
Weather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Cicudy, CI•Cfcudy, R ,Rain, S-Sno► !Sleet, W-Windy 3.1114 .3
" Persons complatinq the irrigation inspections must initial to signify that inspections vrere completed at least every 12J minutas.
A00
-W

Form IRR-2
Tract
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Omer
11%
0-wners Address
owner's Phone R
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I 1�41 A 2
irrigation Operator l� G�1-�y44J/,,0-;
lmoation Operator's
Address Q zo.G—
Ooerator s Phorie _ w
' x
From Animal Waste Management Plan
7—]
Crop Type / Reccnirnended PAN �
'
>= C( R. �. LozcTng(bJaGe) = 19j'
i
(21 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) (l
3 0 Field X
n
P � • � X ��l L ,c°
I Irrigation-
I
I
I
t7ate
mrn/
( yr1
Start Time
r min
(h )
End Tir> a
hr_n"dn
( )
i ctGl Mnutes
(3) - (2)
: of Sphrlder5
Operating
Flow Rale
(�/mom )
Total Volume
. (gallons)
(4) X (5) x (6)
Volume Per
Acre (g flac)
�)'+(A)
r
Waste Analysis
PAN-(lb/1000cal)
PAN Applied
oblac)
[(a) x (�J _ t.000
Nitrogen Ealance
(Iblac;
(S) _(;0j
i
J
-
I
I
I
!
J
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
II
I
J
! I
I
I
!
I
I
I
!
!
!
f
l=
J
!
crop cycle totals I I
Ownef's Signature
Certiffed Operator (Print}
Operator's Signature
Operatcr Ceftfication
00
M
0
0
0

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
AMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
CERTIFIED MAIL7002 2410 0003 0273 3013
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Department of Correction
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67, Tillery, NC 27887
Dear NC Department of Correction:
March 13, 2012
!IfIc ON
Dee Se��e�
ZIOZ l �dW cre
t
Subject: Additional information request
Permit No. NCA442001
Caledonia Prison Farm
Halifax County
The Division of Water Quality has received an NPDES permit renewal application for this facility. Additional
information is required for further review and public notice before the issuance of the NPDES General Permit
certificate of coverage to this facility:
1. Phosphorous Evaluation: For coverage under the NPDES General Permit, a phosphorus evaluation through
phosphorus loss assessment tool (PLAT) is required for all fields utilized in the nutrient management. plan.
Please submit such assessment of phosphorus, including the datasheets, for each of the fields used in your plan.
Be sure to update your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan, if required, to include the current risk
assessment rating upon completion of the phosphorous -loss evaluation.
2. Setback Map: Please submit a map showing either a 100-foot setback with no vegetated buffer or a 35-foot
setback with a vegetated buffer fir-orn surface water or wetlands or any conduit to surface water or wetlands in
and around your facility. Such map is required of all NPDES general permits.
3. PAN Balance: Your waste utilization plan lacks the plant available nitrogen (PAN) balance at your facility.
4. Lagoon Volumes: Please submit a lagoon design or as -built calculations to show the lagoon storage volumes at
your facility.
5. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) PI An O &M plan for your facility is missing in the package.
Please send the above requested information to the following address within 30 days of receipt of this notice. Feel
free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
cc: Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
RaleighRegional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
APS Central Files (NCA442001)
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.nmatergualitv.om
Sincerel
J. R. Joshi
DWQ Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
One.
No hCarol.i.:na
atura!!U
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality .
August 1 i 2007
NC Department Of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
4216 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, NC 27699-4216
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA442001
Caledonia Prison Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Halifax County
Dear NC Department Of Corrections:
In accordance with your application received on 12/27/2006, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC Department Of Corrections, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste management system in accordance with NPDES General Permit NCA400000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Caledonia Prison Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following wet system poultry annual averages:
Non -Laying Pullets: 0
Layers: 60000
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2012 and replaces the NPDES COC
issued to this facility with an ,expiration date. of July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized
and required to `operate the :system in conformity. with the conditions and. limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the . facility's CAWMP, and this. COC. An adequate system for• collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste ' production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of
animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and -this
COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read. this COC and the enclosed General Permit. This General Permit contains
many new requirements than the previous NPDES General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience
is a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting.. Please
hav careful attention to the record keening and monitoring conditions in this hermit. The Animal
Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned to the Division of Water
uality by no later than March 1st of each year.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatmualily.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NamNa` Carolina
turally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Upon abandon ment-:or depopulation -for a period of , four, years. or :more, the Permittee' must submit
�.
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are.met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall:be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCSstandards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with. NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC ' are unacceptable, you have the right: to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information -on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is .located in a. county covered by our Raleigh. Regional Office: The, Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may, be reached, at (91-9). 7.91-4200. If you need: additional, information concerning this:
ni
COC or the General Perinit please contact_the Animal Feeding Operations Unit'staff at [phone].: .
Sincerely,
for 'Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit,NCA400000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax7County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File NCA442001

State of North Carolina
` Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 25, 1999
Phillip Sykes
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
AN
ffl?W,A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWP420001
Caledonia Prison Farm
Poultry Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Phillip Sykes:
In accordance with your application received on February 2, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC Dept. of Corrections, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with State
General Permit AWG300000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Caledonia Prison Farm, located in Halifax
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 60,000 Layers and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting; and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and
injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWP420001
Caledonia Prison Farm
Page 2
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
'�
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
Raleigh_RegrQn:41- f ie-e Water Quality -Section
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
T.Stevens

W.
Q
RECEIVED
State of North Carolina WATER QUALITY SECTION
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality FEB 0 21999
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) Non -Discharge Permitting
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Caledonia Prison Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: NC Dept.'of Corrections
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 67
City, State: Tillery NC Zip: 27887
Telephone Number (include area code): APAZ-AY/ 252-826-5784- 252-826-3821
1.4 County where facility is located: Halifax
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): I-Iwy. 561 West approx. 10 miles West off Hwy. 258
and approx. 10 miles East off Hwy. 301 from Halifax.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Jy iJfZL 1jt Phillip C. Sykes
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): N/A
1.8, Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 0 1/0 1/60
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): N/A
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _ipti42_ (county number); 1 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descron: Poultry operation
Layer
60000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum nurn er for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) O'rurkcy
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:. No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page l of 4 42 - 1

0
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 104 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 104
2.4 Number of(lagoons/storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 3
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (NO )(please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (NO )(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
N/A YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 01 /01 /60
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 2 of 4 42 -1
Applicants Initials
PC
PCs " u

Facility Number: 42 - 1
Facility Name: Caledonia Prison Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, N C Dent- of CnrrPcti nns (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for Caledonia Prison Fartns (Facility name listed in'question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.. I understand that if all required parts of this -
application are not completed and that if a required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application '
package will be returned to asi m ete.
Signature qDate 2�1�AA
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, Phi 11 iD r. O.Vkpq (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for Izon. (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me an id s accura a an comp e e o e best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed -and at if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this'application
package will a ret d as o lete.
Signature Date _ 211/99
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:'
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
RECEIVED
WATER OUN-IN SECTION
FE6 0 21999
Nott UrAiar9e Permitting
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 42 -1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I.1 Facility Name: Caledonia Prison Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: NC Dept. of Corrections
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 67
City, State: Tillery NC Zip: 27887 _
Telephone Number (include area code):18RAZ P/ 252-826-5784- 252-826-3821
1.4 County where facility is located: Halifax
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Hwy. 561 West approx. 10 miles West off Hwy. 258
and approx. 10 miles East off Hwy. 301 from Flalifax.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): /2 r,6ja.. )W jy Phillip C. Sykes
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): NIA
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 0 1/0 1/60
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): N/A
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _42_ (county number); _1 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Poultr operation
Layer
60000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Un of Aniinnle
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 "turkey
No. of Animals:
RECE,VED
WATER QUWTY SECTION
FEB 0 21999
Page 1 of 4 42 - t e Permitting
Non-Discharg

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 104 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 104
2.4 Number of(lagoons/)storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 3
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (NO )(please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (NO )(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
N/A
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? NSA
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 01101160
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
�/
Waste Operations;
PCs ��d
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
1 . Q/
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
pcs V.l
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
PCs
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 42 - 1

Q
Facility Number: 42 - 1
Facility Name: Caledonia Prison Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, N C. 1)Pn1-. of CoriPr-ti nn.-, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for Caledonia Pi-ison Farms (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and! if a required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to a as i m ete.
Signature Date 9/1/99
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, Phi 11 iD_r- S_ykes (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for CAI ` (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
Ti has been reviewed by me ans`accura eaaad `comp e e o e best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not complete nd at if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this'application
package will a ret d as o / lete.
Signature Date 2/1/99
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL. SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF .WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
REQ � S C,
WATER
FEO 0 21999
Nan-Dischat9e Perm►��g
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 42 -1

i
Animal tiVaste Management PIRECEIVED
��1� 1'1irED
(Please tvoe or orint all informadon dyat'does not reuuire a si,ana(ur':)
E.Yisting New or Ex anded '( l6se circle.one) JAN 61997
enerai Information: WATER QUALITY SECTION
Name of Farm: �q �CGI On ; CA_ �5 r Non-Qischarge Co
Owner(s) dame: ill G. D pf 1,2'r Phone \o:_ZL6 - SGZ/
Mailin o .address: O , I6 XC 6 % 7? 8 7
Farm Location: 114 5(' io ^ -/'_S Councv Farm is located in:
w.sf ofF Ll,,/y z5V „ d
Latitude and Lonszitude:,16 27 DS Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county roads� map
/With Vocation identified and describe below (Be speific: road
names. directions, milepost. etc.) GIC- 74 r"al���
Operation Descriodon:
Type of S► -ine ho. of animals
:1 Wean to Feeder
_1 Feeder to Finish
• Farrow to Wean
• Farrow to Feeder
• Farrow to Finish
.0 Gilts
_1 Boars
Type o paltry No. of animals
Layer 60,, o 0 0
:1 Pulleu
Other Type of Livestock:
Type of Cattle No. of animals
_1 Dairy
J Beef
Number of animals:
...........,:::..,:..:,:..:.::::.:..........................................
.:}Siv}}?:':::::::.vx:,:::::.::,�:}::{}.:.}'>:::'r'i•.y::v'.'v::}::i.:.{{r;i•}w:::•::;:•'K:: n.v::: .:: �.n... r:,v:::::;.+........� •.v:..v::.::{{.S'{j.}:{.: .......... :....vv::r_.;:;;+' :::.,: ,,.yTvn}�_t:.y {.
.:.:::...:...:.. ...... ......:.:. r:: v:::{,: ;,aa.. v::::::: ;•.::..v:;,v.v.::: r w:.. v.v ...y..}v.:::'nWx::: v, .. •:.}+:': } }?:O:i?.;: •:::::::::..v. �
�l ?� v.:v::::::.:v......ay.v:: nav:.n:.... : +;... p .:......... }' •.v: r,:v:.::v;. �:}:: ii }...v::.; Y.�:+...::: \ t?y...,y, .
•... ... .... ......v-....:...............tt.r....n...•t:•:..v:n.:::'w::::.n:?S:'?'.i{.::!::.v.: w:.:....:.: n}:: ;: :...
..O erattotc.OnI :......r..t.:::.a.............�::::..t................ ...:.:...,::..tr:::.;> {::}•.;::;:}:
....:...........,,...,.:, .,..:.:.:..........................\:::.:::::{{{•}n:v::::::...:::::: ..v:.v::::;\.;.}!i$;:;}ii%2�>?:i?'"^•t.::?}:v:vi::ii}::::'3.{: ...a .{... t............n. \J.h+ a\..i.: S:•}:
.::::::.. .n.r.:t+:v:: ....v..... ...t .,.. :.: ....: :.:.w:::::: ... ...:::::: ..: ... ,..T: ...: .. a ..: ..v::::vv::.v;. ...:: n•.v •:: r.v v.,n :v:: •..^::: 25..2............ ..: :.::. t. i....tu Y.va,:.. :: �:
.:-...n......... .. +.:..: •::.mot,.:. !. nt: non...........:: .: ti'tY......aaf }v},.u. ..??.v.N wry.: Yt. ... :...,.....Y v......:.. .t ..:a ..........{•. .............. :... n.., •i.:v .::: � ..5 ..?;.}}:::{.}}�::}::' ... y.'R\\:v
ark'ildrtranal:•DesrenCauacttt•�>•>:::�.':::.?,:>..:...:.:Toral.DestQ>r Crroacrty:•:a�:<;:<:,.:: ... ....
Acreage Available for Application: /D 5r /c • Required Acreage: Lli rf 4,17 /D¢
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : 3 Total Capacity: 894e6 Cubic Feet (P
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or VO (please circle one)
if YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
i� +k ,k ai ,i is M a� aN sa r ,it �!t �N si * ,k,k iM is � ,k ,k � s� * � * at s[ i� � � y. yt M i� �!t 1Y � ,!t � �!t,!t,k �k ai � ,k si }ia ai, is a� it M # s,. +K is M aj� i,. as a,. i,� is >,a �a sa * +i• +k ,;�,1t it rt,!t air is is ai is ,!t
Owner / 1lanager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of dye waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Manaeement before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly dtrough a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 3S-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from dye
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areasmust be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know drat any modification
MUSE be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DELI or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
,Name of LandC A/ f- I\ -,f .,I r _ - __-1. _ _
Signarure': GPI
:Name of NIanaf!
Si;nature:&-Jle
AINC __ .au-'wt t.
/�—a 9-9 7

Technica•1 Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the `North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuz, o
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal �«1$;�
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental `lanuemen,
(DENT) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.031.7 and 13A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC. 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Stora;e. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
-ZExistine facility Without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity:
requirements.
storage capability consistent with waste utilization
J New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)' ---
.animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or ecceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): (�G`fne. S �,A'
Affiliation-9 kCS Date Work Completed:
Address (Asenc ): , O o /;-�'oa/ AI- C 279'37 Phone No.:_
Signature: Date: / Z - t_7
B) Land licatior(Site (WUP)
Th . plan provides for minimum separations (buffers): adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print)::. Wayrl e,
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agenc7 ?3 9 Phone \'o.: ,.5-F3- 3y9/
Sinature: Date:
C) Runoff�Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
—ZFacility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
=-I. Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from loungin_ and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ --1. �at/►1e— 5 k o✓�
Affiliation /V PC _S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agencv): _box-gl,,�a.k- Al. C. Z783 Phone No.: (4/9) 5"�3 -3�/81
Signature: DaEC- Lz — 7�
.a%%'C -- .au,uNt /. 1vv7

hox
s,. o o a wnSie 1�Dllcat'on etluinme W
c�stin or rrt+nndin f tujlity with ext. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or 6� uated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing or applications has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are c.,,ntained as part of
the plan).
_.1 New. exonnded or existing facility without existing waste avelicntion eauipment for soriv irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing or -
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
cuntained as part of the plan).
-D New exonnded, nr existing facility without existing waste noolication euuipmem for land sareading not usinv
srr v irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommbdate the waste management plan:_ (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established. required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
-conmined as put of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L6-Yh e- S k o ✓ 4—
Affiliation /��RCS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agenc ): D g � 1-6-� a -'3 Phone No.: ry/f
Signature: Date: /.2
E) Odor !;(ontrol. Insect Control. Nfortality ilytanaeement_and E_mer2encv_Action Plan (SD.
St. WUP. RC or 1)
The waste management plan 'for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality ;management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Nlanagemem Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Wayne -S ho✓-�
Affiliation C S Date Work- Completed:
Address (Agenc), : P, D , t30 V A8'14 qC, 27'3 Phone No.: 5-IF3
Signature: Dace: 1 z— 0
F) Written ?flotice of New or En2ndin? S%Ane Farm
The follomwing signature b ck is only to be used for new or expanding seine farms that begin constructfo er June
21, 1996. If the facility was uilt before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have atte red to contact by certified mail all adjoining p owners and all property owners
w•bo own property located across a pu ' • road. street. or highway from th' or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of N l06-3G5. A copv notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached. - _ _ _
Name of Land Owner:
Sinattice•_
Name of Sian
Si;natufe:__
r (if differeric from owner):
�._... _... _ Date: -.. _... _... .
Date:
'1Vc •- Aut"ust 1. 1997

.I.
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storatle. Treatment Installation
New. eeoanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technic: -I Specialist (Please Print): J. �WUJrle•- hU✓�'
Affiliation Al R C S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agencv) o al: •ra)e W C..27 Phone N+o.:- 583- W
Signature: Date: f Z 3 D- Q 7
B) Land Aooication Site (WGP)
Check- the appropriate box --.._.- - - -
7a/The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the -waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/dav/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilizadon plan.
Q Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 dad
of this certification. the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ne, s h o r -4-
Affiliation /ll R C Dace Work Completed:
Address (A,o,n U. o o ��� �l �� -z 7�3 9 Phone No.:t191,7J S?3 - 3VS-
S ignacure: I Date: ! z
This foilowiKg signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) ha committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish a interim crop for erosion control. and will submit 7--d
adon of completion
from a Technical Specialist with• 15 calendar days following the date spec' to the ertification: I (we)
realize that failure to submit this v ficadon is a violation of the was anagement plubject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DE`I.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Nlanager (ffA
Signature:
WC •- .august I. 1997
erenc from owner):
1
Date:
Date: 1

(RQ
MVtluvli Itl 1101RIilt ale ruff orr pr puiiulunls Irtim ItlynViAj Ind hC.1►'V U11i Yd• .1 l;lt►'r. bcln MAL114 4 U ipet;iti4u
HP 0C plan. I
Fur facilities without cxieilor lots, no trtfffcotiprt. ft nt Islam.
df Te dame ochnic 1$peclal st (Please Pint);.,
Aifilia:ion,,,,� Uf�. ���'°1- Dole WorR.CQmpleltj:' -- — _.._
AdQre!s (Agetjcy)'f" EPge b6 �o .s'o .9Lif%9 ph0A0 �'0.: 91sp Fal
r<#'V D) A,
Clerk
J
(Wt:Y or •1)
An(=l Ovule apvllcalion and hsndi"11% equipn►ent spteirt4d in iNe plan is On s(te Ud rnnvy for Vit:
tali tun slid eJ)uetmant males;old have been provided to the ot►.'ttetti 3AQ art rtintalneq rn part of did plan.
t
�ntn�o weste opplieodoa and t,vditng truulpnwnt ept:ciflatl 4n tiw:pihn list pin buds InsshlltJ but use tit%
fist pr to),ets icasinq Of thins ptuty eppllaellun end iuu QrovWs>1 / 110-W Writn9.1; CyuipmeAl s;+el;itled to
unc'eo tract igril i With. Old tegvirlements of the pltA: rnr11111t140 b4f(IM e';sn be ntelnlalnvd: Olibr4liVA cup
el,lue lent Suldtulet he+e bairn provided it) 09 OWMI't 94d Art Ctl>~ 41kd U AM of the pine.
bean
%ome of Techn
r�ftilitiUon.j,�
Address
S ig n a turf .,,,.,,
The foliowin'? St
above h" beam
that
sotelne'd In my
from a ocnnlc
iwe, re 7t to It tf;
(us) tv trifor,
NoRu dt Lanid t
Sivoturt:—,
Same of Nunae
ItLonl:1 approval; Midttti ws6tt epplicstion ono hVdling lquipDtt?at Spbcltltd in U14 plu 041
Isa'eafued and will bt orl cite end intl wild by tbtdtlt8/ltaYMU); were IS adegvolc
to ,tWi$ the waste vndl Use equiptnent Is lntW14d and -Undl the watt tarn ba Ions $Afltad In
Lm4 with the cropping systetn cotltllned In ft plan: and eaeibmdott u+d edjvstnneht iutt>anee bcve
rovided to the owners and tut eontWned as part of the plaA.
al SpeciallSt (please Print):, Piz
agan;BF.�- Gifirm4s, SAN, Date -Work COMpit;Wd:� t_ �l SI 1
:� �aX�—S�R� i�i4 Mi,���6� �. �'0��, P�D00 �t?.� 4i�•71b��OC�
naturt block is only to be used when the
licked.
(%►O have committed to purchu s tht rrilAt11
*A04u rtaneipment plan tn4 Will luomit t
Will wig
to lubmit this ver(lit:
action fmtn DEN!
caner:
different ffom o vw):
F.) 4 Ial, Ingart Cnnlroo,a, nd �tortalite Manoe�rncnj,�,�j�.-,�L �ilt►P RC qr t}
`iat'hoas % oon ol.000rs Lnd ►meets is specified In Ote Plan have WA inimNett and are operudof53l. the
mortality ntariag mans systern as tpeclAW in the Ptah has also been Ir�jjtilled ark 10 opvtaU 1141,
Name of Tech tical Speclaiist (Ple4le prif►t):G�a� � ��; 7, �
pa
Atfiliatio9 tC•1VOtk Complt►tad
+,t dMS (A; nC
Stdn;,ture: / <<'y'i'� .......,,._.....,....._Dart:_ l,, :`,•a._
Date: — -U-
--
box for condlNona! apArev% n fli 1)
t
wfut ,eulori and hdntlitn� equlpmert as
8CMa:vcnR�'tlton of dtlivot'y ants tnt►wllctinn
data 4.evided id die eolulitiouoi certltieodun. i
Ine waste Manaltment ptpn and %Vill sutijtl : me
E
••..(;tl.i. K.a

tir1
� tad
11�;G
. • PROUD SPONSOR
1.888.767.1999
Wq RECEIVED
DUA111,, C1]ON
AM 2 2 1999
Non -Discharge pemlit6ng,
North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises
P. O. Box 29540
2020 Yonkers Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
Apri4 16 999
James B. HuntJr., Uovernor
NCDEN'R
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N. C. 27626-0535
Dear Ms. Thomas:
James Godwin
Enterprise Director
Subject: Application No. AWP420001
Additional Information Request
Caledonia Prison Farm
Animal Waster Operation
Halifax County
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
Enclosed is the additional information you requested in your letter dated April 8, 1999.
Question # 1. Please note on Page 3, Animal Waste Utilization Plan, animal waste of nitrogen per
acre for soybeans is at 15 pounds per acre rather than the usual 40 pounds per acre. The residual
Nitrogen for soybeans is at 25 pounds per acre.
Question # 2. Please note that the irrigation system and pump design were reviewed by NRCS
Engineer,Joy Sherrod and met the NRCS specifications when installed. See the attached copy of letter
dated 3/4/99.
Question # 3. The waste water from the three layer houses will enter Lagoon # 2. The water is
then gravity fed througli a pipe, into Lagoon # 1. From Lagoon # 1 it is transferred with a lift pump into
Lagoon # 3.
Please advise if you have any further questions or if we can be of any assistance.
Sincerely,
CALED/ONIA PRISON FARM
Phillip C. Sykes
Farm manager
Sv� b
Cc: John Clark
Phone: [phone] Courier # 53-71-00 Fax: [phone]

j0A
• NRCS
201 St. Andrews Street
Room 138
P.O. Box 10
Tarboro, NC
27886
Telephone
[phone]
TO: John Clark
SUBJECT: ENG - Caledonia Prison Poultry Operation
Irrigation System
Halifax County, NC
DATE: March 4, 1999 n
FROM: Joy Sherrod ` '
CC: Andrew Snead, NC Dept. of Correction
I have reviewed the information submitted to me on the proposed waste
water land application system for Caledonia Prison as furnished by
Triangle Environmental Inc. Item # 3 under General Notes, Sheet 1 of
5 of the drawings, specifies 4 inch class 200 PVC. This should be 6
inch class 200 PVC to comply with the drawings and calculations.
A review of the design showed the designer based his calculations on a
Nelson 150.7 inch taper bore nozzle. I understand the poultry
operation has a range of Nelson 100 ring nozzles. A 150 .7 inch taper
bore nozzle will need to be purchased to meet the design requirements
or the design revised to use one of the existing nozzles. Due to time
constraints, purchasing the taper bore nozzle would be more efficient.
On March 2, 1999, we laid out the location of the proposed hydrants
and the beginning of each pull. Based on the measurements taken that
day, length adjustments were made to pulls # 4A, 5A, 5B, 6, and 7.
Pull #7 was changed to a 300 degree spray. These adjustments are
shown on the attached map. I have made some revisions to the
effective area calculations on the irrigated area worksheet, as was
agreed to by Andrew Snead.
The design will meet MRCS standards and specifications once the waste
utilization plan is revised to show 29.9 acres of effective irrigated
acreage under the traveler system. Approximately seventeen acres of
coastal bermuda grass are required to utilize the PAN being produced.
I understand that the cost share contract will pay on the required acres.
The operator should be encouraged to maintain a permanent marker
for the location of the gun cart at the start of each pull. Once the
system is installed, a letter of certification is needed from the irrigation
installer confirrning the system has been pressure tested and has been
installed according to NRCS standards and specifications. You are
encouraged to visit the site during installation and testing of the
system.

l (41
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 9 fig' V
Producer: CALEDONIA PRISON Non-Discharge
Parrni2ting
Location: P.O. BOX 137��
TILLERY NC 27887 r` / �, ��U:;.�
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing P51JL"nv LAYING.
Number of Animals: 60000 head
(Design Capacity) ` t
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
'This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

i ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methodsin the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may -want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
..;crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
60000 head x tons waste/head/year = tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
60U00 head x .084 lbs - PAN/head/year = 5039.4 lbs . PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Paae: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
IFIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
!
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
ITT
TIME
4485
3304
86
StB
FP
3.0
150
0
29.9
I
SEPT-MAY
3304
3304
3304
3304
mr6r.,
3304
3304
3304
3304
StB
81 IStH
t6
t
t
t
28
StB --
26
StB
28
StB
BH
16.3
1315
10
129.9
19418.5
SBPT
SG
29
49.3
0
29.9
I
11474.07
NOV-APR
210
SB
40
15
25
14.0
I
1
1
1
1
1 JUN -AUG
.
CO
800
96
0
I
114.0
11344
APR-AUG
210.0
C
120
0
I
1150
114.0
MAP, Ml
SG
29
49.3
0
I
1
1
114.0
1690.2
NOV-APR
SB
I
40
15
25
4.8
172
JUN-AUG
CO
800
0
I
I
196
14.8
1460.8
APR-AUG
C
120
0
I
1
1150
14.8
1720
MAR - JUN
SG
29
49.3
0
I
1
1
14.8
1236.64
NOV-APR
SEND I= I I 1 I
TOTAL
Page : 3

J/r�-4C-
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
-
I
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
"DOTE: j The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while - meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
I nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses.nitrogen.
'1OTE: SOME FIELDS ARE SHOWN WITH A AND THESE FIELDS ARE PART OF
THE NORMAL CROPPING ROTATION. THESE FIELDS MAY BE PLANTED WITH
ANY ONE OF THESE CROPS, AND THE NUTIENT UPTAKE WILL HAVE TO BE
ACCOUNTED FOR THAT PARTICULAR CROP.
/c
_12 0 71 zr
r
0 c
, 15
//C/ev����
17144f
je -12e At
- ,✓�l/�oJF�
X ale
j rc
WA F o
JUN 0 , 1999
Non-Dischar
ge Permiffig

/1
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a %,'
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
i
NOTE: SOME FIELDS ARE SHOWN WITH A ti
THE NORMAL CROPPING ROTATION. THESEAFDJDTHES�E�'FIELDS ARE PART OF
ANY ONE OF THESE CROPS, AND,THE NUTIEN,TPMAY BPLANTED
TAKEWILLHAVE TOBEACCOUNTED FOR THAT PARTICULAR CROP. /
i

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTALI0
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
i hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the. season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables-1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
CO
COTTON
POUNDS
0.12
FP
TALL FESCUE -GRAZED
TONS
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
1.0
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
1.7
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
78.6
0
0
78.6
* BALANCE
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Pane: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
t �
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not' exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
.rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
,texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
' time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
3304
28
StB
SB
0.5
*1.0
3304
60
StB
SB
0.5
*1.0
3304
81
StB
BH
0.5
*1.0
3304
86
StB
FP
0.5
*1.0
3304
StB
C
0.5
*1.0
3304
StB
CO
0.5
*1.0
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I -
3304
�28
StB
3304
StB
3304
StB
3304
"60
StB
3304
StB
SG
SG
0.50
0.5
0.5
0.50
0.5
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over.
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
.;Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
';"temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
i months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application.rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
V
4
a
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is.eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be.broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the.soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
.the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

rr
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
.(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12.'Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall'be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
i
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:CALEDONIA PRISON
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CALEDONIA PRISON
(Please print)
Signature:
Date:
Name of M4 ag (I differe om owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)John Y Clark
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-583-3481
Address (Agency): Post Office Box 8
Halifax NC 27839-0008
Signature. __CQADate: Q�_�
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent.Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
w
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19 '
My commission expires
day of
Notary Public.
(SEAL)
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Partv Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My•commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

Q� It''� � N° i" t '�".�4fir,tFr, '� q, ''$�, •t1� ... � 14.X` ! .i v v �7 r + •.:A:
1r; � ,t� i 1 d tti v ��� � • n7'• 1 ���� t .3�'tr�� �(��� • 9r OTC
�76 ➢ � r r. ;�K � P 1, ,� � ( y fly \,:. , r.
;a tr Fr'r J� � ja,•r .Y" o '. .\ "-r'IfiLir ., g,
to
r y 'iu =-IY•!'j.7i" { n• a� V' �' � � , r .i,;.�j,�r.
fib+LU
'r
i ,� j Cr t raj rPFw y,�� �, \ t � /' -r✓':/,7��v"D. �. f_�
. i„1 • -� \ . r li �,}I��.c tic�'.N�,. `t �� '' �7/�rl� t ' � �• tY (�
I�/.� �\,� �,! V4t'f%y��t Ff .. t }: r'.,.t '� 'zf� ;, t•�'•i �'„ h��,Fi4 1' � ��r�'• ..\ � `
, tul
r !i , • ` y F j-OP.•t a . r ®
ry
r % +��J 4� 1��/ `'�,v1� if � � '� � �. %��-'►�ii'� � S�?�"t /��� �s�r�' �' � `' { �' (.
f ` .�.•': � ,,' ,! �-- ? .:. ` S_] �yl` S ytf�,? ;•f. ,• ',, � `YV 1 1, I
\• / �t / ` r • 4 . ? t •P"',f'� �(l!?rhPA' , .) vts� . ,, U� ti El� r r. ,,•
TV
�\�\Y / :=i"�'.`'�`�� / � •i �if�, ::�I� ` ys ...Rr"' tirt"� i .��'1" vi.t �• •. ,`� 1 t .r
let,'�
7 /� .�\�,`tv .t._ r r \ v `'. � � � .. v r` � �e'� r y ��y3`r:..+ w•,�r}yi���;•: � ,'s i � a �1t�n+ t•.��,:1�{
NIX,, ' �' °, t_ +. ;,,, Si .i >• rZ L , ram. �
T` r..
, < � •s �'t�if'rv. •, `r ',��
• /,�, { -.i'. r?' ,1 %. 'ds p rf r 1. r.r,.1 ,�N rtM ,y. �^j+,, t• -r',�
1 � , . , f • R , y.M, r. �F_ � 1
. �_ L. � • b+v'� 1 ( f ' 't� ' ,' � y � �. r1v, ,1'' tx ii tl rv"a } i .t'Y w��+•T .:G ";��
' .. � �. �' 'P` �1 .�' J' � \` f � :•1'1. �T: r'' 1)./S � 1 r ,�A •;• t t:� ir.• .. ;1
'� � ,,�•. � _ .�` •-� ''•s �h . N /' .:�,j; k.#}. , t + 1 I; {fir d ' f
� +'�, � � � ! � •� , r P!'?{ ,� 9� .{i�':•� �y,�t� 7i7�ntge 7� 7[r 7'vv� f. 7;l '�i, %,.
�!. 7 1+r •"� t!ti !'rl4 74�1y �HSi 1•'rrii� �� f
r: �` `• •,r � � eta" ?��', i � ,�" $, . �`
44,
. f'+• ` w:�'•• .+ ,� `� 4•``� .ny tl� r_,• �•� rl �.r �rf ,.?qw, •_ r 4t,� r.
•�r.� k �4r ��4� ���'%' �xr'''Cilr �+i S .t`r`�'�8 al'.
,� t<l;. 'i ;�,•.�:�{ 'aN �C,Q � � �: '�`,4.? •1= ,,r, 1, f� r� � .'R' ' (•� ' ?4 . ''; .r ', �� � 'fit �� i! ..�..7. � �°•'!f`•"� P:�x :A. �i t�!" (�' yyl�*��:-�','
�1 a 1F � ,.,'1'..,• �`� � �B'1": ^�tlit�.f,,yyy�� i .. '. r f Tf:� .'t ' f�al ,i�` }.4 �'"' h
..,�' -f ' f as •'. yCki•p,K. .✓' ti�'•' t J ,n-
,�''. � It, + )�'� l � '� rs 1 r � ern. -7� /- � • t� \ .� � P `j�
fir. ,•• •� •4 { t �: �. •jti�: r' �r,It c 1. r. • 'f `._.t. :.+• s � :���'.}. •'
., rt r ; ;`_ 1�.�:'e'M�•f:� •r. F.Y=rl Ty rf !� ( J - v , s t• .. � V.•
• � �f�l 111 �.» "'..; t J+' r^ V,. •f P�i� �-
` � .. � . ..� � 1 tl�:r�'. it i ..';�:?'ir l►�:��'.:•:, � %.a - . �. �`,w,4t �i

F'o% 'I
WT,
PON, - lu do -is
EApostue

'Ab
44m
J L
ZT.,
T775tZ F: =77-12,
co.
71,
vSri
toAp
FiLorms

.t
AV,.��-, \airs od x
fs � ,qcNI
�+. tip, ,� �• � - �~� ,(� � ,,. @. ...\�.. ��` �`.a� i
� ti'ii p;,�,4 ��i�'.F 1�� ,� �; :fC� r• Ll.yr .�,-:' .p � %'. � ''{•" +�.�\� 1 .��/ � �. ti`
r �'. 1 y. ��^�•�� ' n�� A � 'J'••'' � ~ a( Yi 4'" •� /� \ � \ \ J a fii J K, ,' , J•-`. \� •' f
jr\��f�f
r, l�7`3�•{ar YF.ly tL�rA, ,� r� ? Y ` .'��,�`. �\. "V ;. �'V \i L� ri4 ri
A7 .a •i.,'A Fy'� �L'k r dIF r � � J i "�:.. / 'gyp. � J , Y',}
i'�".e J '�:: j�°�.ty�''•-��'�d-C� .,: � � ` - i y' ; .. ::y , a L"YJ1r.(�' F � r • ��r' e
/..y.:.4" T
� �
` 4 r?nAy S-•L i. :,! l .. 1. f , j ¢, o-� y - / r C.•', r Lf
iz
n�Z`(j/,�Q`
Zw
1.9
IAP P.
''k•'r�'la� � t• ! �1 11
'� ;, ra.. �i�t► i,� . l•" L. �,, 1) '�� � Z � \ rA
Z L VuIR' b y (ice
OD f it
ZI
00
"'^� L .. � r•���'•r 4p �./} ."L'•' •t tI1F,� it'd ~.h',� .. �.

71--rW wr

r n �
�°'''�. ��}y�� _ a;. • fir• '.. ,r.
I,.. � :' �.I :• ¢. _ � '� :'awl ,,:.�' `' v •ti Cry-•, �:"r." `x � ;,
��� ,..� _ .tip -r - ;�`_^•• �'`,. �, �� ,� z -�t
YI>•. •�..:f,t. ,'�- i1, a, ^.;.•_ Sf 1` •rf*�;,� p 'I 1 a r �. � ,•tti`t;�y
}', i � t\.! . .;A.; •, 1. cf 'r• -3r. �'� -•.�fh •' .•�•' �_��e� -i!t.i ,�'n � 1 f_S ',� ,. (.••.c�4.�•. :: i.is d.� A ��. •motif `� +
! 1ti r `r t Z1 �• �'e, e. ,1 .,,yt. � Jl �• ♦ 1 1� S ♦', ;,af*��y lat. b (- { 4(p i ro �' S�S"
R� tint 1 .Y r J , ), • rr r- h ( ri t �� � � Tt!ir�F-Y��t r t ,II
•%.••�~�: '\l, •-r r,' �- -• .r �' ��:U(rt;ll. �', �tl�I `�,,•"r �r?tl'( L , 1 -r' a
1i •r •y: r ''f. r.�. •t .,,'.'� .f , 'ti �,� i3•�I p,�',��V. ! TT f. j� t
S i•�t-b,; ,, >� •, .. t r J`� ..1i hili'•� +� j� .f,� , � 1'•�. f, 1

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON (LAYER)
U
LIENTS NAME
COUNTY
TODAYS DATE
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE _>
NUMBER OF LAYERS
TREATMENT VOLUME
(minimum 2.5 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
CALEDONIA FARMS
HALIFAX COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
� 1 S 00 FEET
60000
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =_________>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 7.7 feet
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES ___________________________>
Permanent Volume Required 675000.0 cubic
Permanent Volume Provided 302910.1 cubic
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET>
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY =___>
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =____>
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL
FREEBOARD
Temporary Storage Volume 204860.3
2.5
0.0
YEARS
320.0
FEET
155.0
FEET
48.9
FEET
41.2
FEET
41.2
FEET
3.0:1
feet
feet -73-DQ,a
a.5 ek-
53477
SQUARE FEET
180 DAYS
780 GALLONS (EX 6 c .ss WI)7L
7.6 INCHES
6.6 INCHES
1.0 FEET
cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 54.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 350.6 feet Width = 185.6 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation = 51.7 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 48.9 feet

STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
4 60000 LAYERS X 4 POUNDS = 240000 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 240000 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.825 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in layers.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = D cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 2.5 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = ERROR cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 48.9 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 41.2 feet
Lagoon size for -normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 7.7
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
'320.0 155.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
273.8 108.8
AREA OF MIDSECTION
49600.0 (AREA OF TOP)
29789.4 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
(Lm * Wm)
296.9 131.9 39161.1 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. _ (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
49600.0 156644.4 29789.4 1.283
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL S= 302910.1 RROR CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED =
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 320.0 FEET LONG BY 155.0 FEET WIDE

DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation
�. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
54.0 feet.
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon
(top of dike)
Length * Width =
350.6
185.6 65071 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
53477 square feet
TOTAL DA 118548 square feet
Pumping
cycle to be 180 days.
6A.
Volume
of waste produced
Volume
= 240000 SSLW * 0.008 gallon/lb. SSLW/day * 180 days
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume
= 46203.2 cubic feet
6B.
Volume
of excess water.
This is
the amount of excess water usage (see tech. guide 633-83)
Volume
= 780 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume
= 18770.1 cubic feet
6C.
Volume
of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess
rainfall (difference) = 7.6 inches
Volume
= 7.6 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume
= 74685.5 cubic feet
6D.
Volume
of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume
= 6.6 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume
= 65201.6 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 46203.2 cubic feet
6B. 18770.1 cubic feet
6C. 74685.5 cubic feet
6D. 65201.6 cubic feet
,TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 204860.3 cubic feet

DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Volume of temporary storage divided by surface
' area of lagoon.
204860 Cu. ft. / 49600 sq.
Depth required = 860 feet
Depth required = 4.1
Normal lagoon liquid elevation = 48.9 feet
Depth required = 4.1 feet
Freeboard = 1.0 feet
Top of Dam = 54.0 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION
ARE 350.6 FEET BY 185.6 FEET
ft.
54.0
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME 6A. 46203.2 cubic feet
6B. 18770.1 cubic feet
6C. 74685.5 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 139658.7 cubic feet
Depth required
Volume
of pumped
rmalstorage
water lev divided by surface
area oflagoon
l.
139658.7 cu. ft. / 49600 sq. ft.
Depth required = 2.g feet
Depth required = /
' �, APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY: ,;�-�
DATE:
DATE: /D/ '7 f �� /

Farm Name: CALEDONIA LAGOON #1
4gdL/F,4X
County: Date: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
D
PRISMODIAL FORMULA
Length = 96 Width = 117
Depth = 8.1 Side Slope(ft/ft)=
1
Volume in Cubic Yards = 2878. 25 = -7 -7, 7/ 3 eu •4-4-.
Top =
Mid =
OV
Bottom =
11232
sq.
ft.
9572.31
sq.
ft.
87.9
lin.
ft. X 108.9 lin. ft.
8043.84
sq.
ft.
79.8
lin.
ft. X 100.8 lin. ft.
Prepared By: J P SHERROD

ra••a
4-9.�
Farm Name: CALEDONIA LAGOON #2
County: PITTFAX Date: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
Q- 1, a• ) D
i 3 RRI SMODIAL FORMULA
Length = 314 Width = 127
Depth = 8.6 Side Slope(ft/ft)=
Volume in Cubic Yards =
Top = 39878 sq. ft.
Mid = 36159.36 sq. ft.
1
11525.28 = 31 1, I
305.4 lin. ft. X 118.4 lin. ft.
Y Bottom = 32588.64 sq. ft.
296.8 lin. ft. X 109.8 lin. ft.
Prepared By: J P SHERROD

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
j TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: SEE APPENDIX VIII.4
Contact Person: GREGG CAMP
Address of Permittee: - ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
P. 0. BOX 308 ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: RRSD ROANOKE RAPIDS WWTP
Site ID Number: D:� o r o 6 o 7
Field Number. 7= , l
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application: _ RC ot= 6�a2f-cziws
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): W . S. LNESV EUT Fcx NCO o C.
Land use or cropping patterns: A Utz( c,vczveto"- c etop-v
Intended use or disposition of crops: kt�Ll - t4U1^4w c4Su syAP'r1W
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
residuals while the Perr ittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
Environmental Management land. application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement..
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of properly prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture. of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping, patterns shown.above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to `the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement
FORM: LARS 06194 Page 16 of 13

a
.114. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 17 of 18

-, 1
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
F;Isy Tti Dare
NORTH CAROLINA, k It I COUNTY,
L the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that W • S• l.✓ fS i
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing inst=ent.
WITNESS my hand and official se this day of 1Z , 19
NOT Y UBLIC
My commission Expires >> z Y 9 7
SEAL:
OFFICIAL SEAL
s Notary PUbliC. North Carolina
COUNTY OF FORSYTH
ROY L. WHITAKER
My Commission Expires Nov.23.1997
t # * * * * * * * * t * * t # * * t * * * * # * * * t * * * # * t * # * * * # * * t # t # * * t # # # t t * t #
L have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
* * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * t Jr Jr Jr * # +r * * * * * * * * # * * t * * * * * * * * * *•
L (!:�" . Of 5`2"J (C.. —Ay is f JR • have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. ,
Petmittee
Date
FORM: LARS 06/94
Page 18 of 18

f
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
FACILITY NAME: ROANOKE RAPIDS PERMIT # WQ001989
OWNER:
CALEDONIA LIVESTOCK DIVISION SITE # :
005
FIELD
# : 02
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY: 0.0
OPERATOR:
Division TOTAL ACRES:
126.00
BUFFERED ACRES: 89.20
TOTAL DRY
TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL): 178.35 CROP:
Bermuda
Lime Application
(tons/acre)
Date
Applied Per Acre Dry tons/acre
Residual Source
%Solids Min.
Rate Temperature
Rain past
24 Site conditons
Method
09/09/98
156000 gal. 1748.88 0.29
Roanoke Rapids
3.94
0.20 70-9'0
No rain
Moist
Surface
09/10/98
201500 gal. 2258.97 0.37
Roanoke Rapids
3.94
0.20 70-90
No rain
Moist
Surface
09/11/98
162500 gal. 1821.75 0.30
Roanoke Rapids
3.94
0.20 70-90
No rain
Moist
Surface
09/12/98
188500 gal. 2113.23 0.35
Roanoke Rapids
3.94
0.20 70-90
No rain
Dry
Surface
09/13/98
208000 gal. 2331.84 0.38
Roanoke Rapids
3.94
0.20 70-90
No rain
Dry
Surface
09/14/98
169000 gal. 1894.62 0.31
Roanoke Rapids
3.94
0.20 70-90
No rain
Dry
Surface
LBS/ACRE
TOTALS
PAN P
As Cd
Cr Cu
Pb
Hg Mo
Ni
Se Zn
Annual
1085500 12169.28 2.00
78.02 83.23 0.012
0.000
0.184 1.288
0.432
0.010 0.160
0.104
0.009 6.358
Cumulative
16.52
0.136
0.030
1.386 12.772
2.992
0.046 0.862
0.698
0.060 40.117
Permit limit (lbs./acre/year) 220
Cumulative
Pollutant Loading kimit (lbs./acre)
34.79
2676.00 1338.00
267.60
15.16 16.06
374.64
89.20 2497.60
/336.57
Amsco, Inc e
`"
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) U
DATE
."I
certify, under penalty of law, that this
document was prepared under my direction or supervision to
accordance
with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gathered and
evaluated the
information submitted.
I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false
information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment
for
knowing violations."

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY`FORM
FACILITY NAME: ROANOKE RAPIDS PERMIT # WQ001989
OWNER: CALEDONIA LIVESTOCK DIVISION
SITE # :
005
FIELD
# : 03
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY: 0.0
OPERATOR:
Division
TOTAL ACRES:
84.00
BUFFERED ACRES: 76.00
TOTAL DRY
TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL): 168.45
CROP:
Bermuda
Lime Application (tons/acre)
Date
07/06/98
07/07/98
07/08/98
07/09/98
07/10/98
07/11/98
07/12/98
Applied Per Acre Dry
97500 gal. 1282.89
175500 gal. 2309.21
143000 gal. 1881.58
117000 gal. 1539.47
175500 gal. 2309.21
208000 gal. 2736.84
130000 gal. 1710.53
tons/acre
0.21
0.37
0.30
0.25
0.37
0.44
0.28
Residual Source
Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids
%Solids
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
Min.
Rate Temperature
0.20 70-90
0.20 70-90
0.20 70-90
0.20 >90
0.20 70-90
0.20 70-90
0.20 70-90
Rain past
No rain
No rain
No rain
No rain
No rain
No rain
No rain
24 Site conditons
Moist
Dry
Dry
Moist
Moist
Moist
Dry
Method
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
LBS/ACRE
TOTALS
Annual
Cumulative
1046500 13769.74
2.22 84.37
6.84
PAN
85.13
P
As
0.012
0.034
Cd
0.004
0.011
Cr Cu
0.257 1.476
0.634 4.351
0.333
1.178
Pb
Hg Mo
0.016 0.106
0.035 0.371
Ni
0.098
0.287
Se Zn
0.007 5.364
0.022 17.880
Permit limit (lbs./acre/year) 220
Cumulative
Pollutant Loading Limit (lbs./acre)
36.57
34.79
2676.00 1338.00
267.60
15.16 16.06
374.64
89.20 2497.60
t
Amsco, Inc v" %_-I✓ _% (/ v L
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) ATE
"I certify, under penalty of la that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision to accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."

:PORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R014-.031 7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND AMSCO
TO: 6490 STADIUM DRIVE
P 0 BOX 1770
CLEMMONS NC 27012
TE OF REPORT 01 / 15 / 9 9 PAGE I
CALADONIA LIVESTOCK
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
ACCT # 45250
MIKE ROGERS
DATE RECEIVED 01/13/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 01/14/99
ORGANIC MATTER
PHOSPHORUS-_
_
POTASSIUM :::r.
' MAGNESIUM.
.' CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
ACIDITY
I C.E.C.
SAMPLE
NUMBER
LAB
NUMBER
% ENR
BRAY PI
BRQYP2
Ks':`'.:,
MG.. :.
CA
NA
SOIL
BUFFER,
'H
IbslA
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm • RATE
ppm
RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
pH
INDEX
meq/100g
meq/100g
)502
15652
5.0 137H
154 VH
206 VH
347-VH
323 VH
1090 M
7.1
0.0
9.0
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
NITRATE -
SULFUR
ZINC
IMANGANESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
SOLUBLE
CHLORIDE
MOLYB-
SAMPLE
SALTS..,.
DENUM MO
NUMBER
K
Mg
Ca
Na
'
H
NOS N
SO, S
ZN
MN
FE
CU
B
CL .
°k
°A
°k
q°
%.
ppm RATE
ppm`. RATE
ppm . RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ms/cm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
3502
9.9
29.8
60.3
0.0
Slues on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the soil. T is r rtapplies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
(planation of,symbolg: Values are expressed as % (percent), ppm (parts per million), or Ibs/A (pounds per acre). m Um of thlr: days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
ating after each value:'VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), H (High), VH (Very High). A a L A E/R/N�AGRICAULLTURAL L/AAB(J� '' "'p�IES, INC.
. _ -.. .. hi:.... --- rl-I-..-.. P• r- /� n�a:.. ,. C.... L.........:��n�nih. // / / /1/) f .,./ 1/1 � n

1_' .:: -.%3lr,,.f.,. .,,-,:.5:2._;.terao. ° nc► :.»-,.., .c. x,; l)t.v...i.�sio-.n>. t..x,.z,, x4300,a R.e...e'rid y_M,. C>r._ ee... oaa:...:.. _. .... .>•� ,y5Y ~ r . �E 1:s� ,t '� e�o65kRisRlig..� tewa.,...
wz m
_
rower.- Caladonia Livestock Copies to: County E.xlei. Director
•
..
s ,
Attn: Greg Walker Amsco Inc.
Rt 1 Box 137
Tillery, NC 27887
Report Anisco Inc.
oZ
vPst Farm: 05 Attn:Michael Rogers
PO Box 1770
7/22/98 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Halifax County Ciemmons, NC 27012
Agronomist. Comments:
FieldInformation�-u
Lied<Lime
-.
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Ko Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N 1105 KO Mg Cu Zn B Mn 'See Note
0503 Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M LIT 180-220 0 100-120 0 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-1 SS-1 Na-N NI1'-N Na
MIN 0.56 1.14 7.9 85.0
1.2 5.6 117 49 67.0 15.0 475 294 295 295 86 72 0.1

f
Name: Caledonia Livestock Division
Rt. 1, Box 137
Tillery, NC 27887
919-826-5784
Landowner #: 05
Operator: Jeff Collier, Superintendent
Greg Walker, Farm Manager
Edward Outland, Cattle Manager
Directions: From Halifax take HWY 561 East approximately 9 miles to SR 1141 and turn
left. There is a sign in the direction of Caledonia. Go 2.5 miles on SR 1141
and Operations Office will be on left.
Field # Total Acres Net Acres Cron
05-01c (sand bed) 78.0 50.0 bermuda
05-02 (fish pond) 126.0 89.8 "
05-03 (silage pit) 84.0 76.0
Total 224.3 174.0

L` ,tty HAL iFAX Owner 4VC.570cl< �-�C✓z:Sxonl

^•\ \ •� n N5
�\ n G p
f/ • , O e a� �p-
�\ -��� n \� �� / p \ ��\ ♦ as \ � • �, +\\ `
...—� � ++ _ �\\� 'tea \\• +� '. \ �,•' ` \ �/ y\\
p $C / rya \ �„ \ ` `-� I / ♦ \,\ j ,
NA
It
PTO CO
cr
�'. a\i 11 r a'� i c� .'a ` `♦ a \�\\� +++C �WiIZG .\OOSaI
+ Pl VPortg� \
\\ . // � 1', �� / � //-�1 //.1/+ � ..ram � + \\ � Jo •, �+++ �` \ �\ \ \�6oa
Ca
C r—. e\ Form ! �� a• o`er \ ,�/ � I \ flat
f �
56
L NV
0,00
0010
Ol � tl •i' \ � \ \ O H\ \ \
•`. •♦tin ,•., 2 � ' i
Owner ark av;s,o Scale: V= ZDoo' Field SIAd81-1 i+z ems{
i ?10)

100 Sty . Cm k`S A -� S �`� ��c►.y
0
CALEDONIA LIVESTOCK DIVISION
-er .Scale: V= 660' Feld rANDBED 1 & 2) 14
Total Acres .7y O Net Acres
=g�-•d� r'` • • • -Stream �°`-'ate - Application Area
- Forested Area
- Steep Slopes S -House w -Pond
- Unsuitable Soils fi�r - Well
R - Rock Outcrop -4, . Wet Area - So-il BoniN9

. . . s Map
�1/07 T SC.4C e
CALEDONIA LIVESTOCK of VlatON
Owner _ .Scale: 1". 400'
Total Acres /2 6
Legend: Stream ^ . Application Area
������ • Steep Slopes - House
- Unsuitable Soils . Well
R - Rock Outcrop .I. Wet Area
.0u 1
jLrAcww c.IG Mt*rs
Field IFISH POND_
Net Acres 8 9 -8
- Wrested Area
lapPond
O - Soil Boring

_ t
FISH POND
IV
SILAGE PIT
. i.
CAL6DON 111 LIVFATOCK Ot V181011
Owner
Av J
SC31@: iw� 400r Field ILACE PIT) 3
Total Acres RN Net Acres 76
Legend: -Stream ev--Q^ .ApplleattonArca
������ • Steep Slopes House
• Unsuitable Soils Well
R Rock Outcrop Wet Area
• Forested Area
W:1 Pond
E) - Soil Borir+q ,

To6ograph id Map
+' •. Sw n .1 1'
\I'\
/ —
• 14 2a.
0p14PTON CO50
GO
N.
•�.�\ �.' .1 1 � � � ,per � � %
o .�; j�..��-• /�\I � � _` � • .�- � '.' jay/, a �posol
_ • emu- cam` ♦�\ \ ♦�` > �o ♦
IS
- �J • Form `\1`\ �.. ♦c
IN IN
-N,\ 14
it Ln
\ 1 I -
i- ^
n n
a
1 al
IV
IN
(OAtl ` ��\
%/� • -:�- �•:} ��' . nth �\'• %/- - - • • - - - - '- - _ _ - _ .
Owner Scale: 1"= 2-oQn Reld L 5:/agt� F'si 'P",�
7llcry Co/rlc�;onol �pc•�%�y
�ocNES CtZoSS/d�R,7S QvR�

CALEDONIA LIVESTOCK DIVISION
Owner -Scale: 1."= 4001
— - Total Acres /2 6
Legend: Stream _ Application Area
Steep Slopes0 -House
- Unsuitable Soils fif - Well
R - Rock Outcrop y - Wet Area
Field (FISH POND
Net Acres _ 8 9. 8
• Forested Area
-Pond
O -Sail Borin9

4
9
V
7
I

SILAGE PIT
CALEDONIA LIVESTOCK DIVISION
Owner
900 Field (SILAGE PIT) 3
Scale: I
Total Acres
R 4 Net Acres 76
Legend:
Stream '°`�� • Application Area
Steep Slopes -House
- Unsuitable Soils Fl - Well
R - Rock Outcrop .V - Wet Area
- Forested Area
w - Pond O S-o3
O - So;1 Boring
Lva

I
0
Z
O
N
1 .00,
CQ
1 -

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 02/01/98 To: 02/28/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(55300.00000 mg/kg - 23600.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(23600.00000) mg/kg + 75.00000 mg/kg
.20(31700.00000 mg/kg) + 23600.00000 + 75.00000 mg/kg
6340.000.00 mg/kg + 23675.00000 mg/kg
30015.00000 mg/kg x .002 a 60.03000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3)
.20(55300.00000 mg/kg - 23600.00000 mg/kg)
.20(31700.00000 mg/kg)
6340.00000 mg/kg
18215.00000 mg/kg x .002
Plant Available Phosphorus
+ 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
+ 0.50(23600.00000) mg/kg + 75.00000 mg/kg
+ 11800.00000 + 75.00000 mg/kg
+ 11875.00000 mg/kg
36.43000 lbs/dry ton
19900.00000 mg/kg x
.002
- 39.80000
lbs, total P/dry ton
39.80000 x
2.3
- 91.54000
lbs P205/dry ton
91.54000 x
.5
- 45.77000
lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3800.00000 mg/kg x
.002
® 7.60000
lbs total K/dry ton
7.60000 x
1.2 -
9.12000
lbs K20/dry ton
9.12000 x
.5 -
4.56000
lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 03/01/98 To: 03/31/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
-20(55300.00000 mg/kg - 23600.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(23600.00000) mg/kg + 75.00000 mg/kg
.20(31700.00000 mg/kg) + 23600.00000 + 75.00000 mg/kg
6340.00000 mg/kg + 23675.00000 mg/kg
30015.00000 mg/kg x .002 ® 60.03000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(55300.00000 mg/kg - 23600.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(23600.00000) mg/kg + 75.00000 mg/kg
.20(31700.00000 mg/kg) + 11800.00000 + 75.00000 mg/kg
6340.00000 mg/kg + 11875.00000 mg/kg
18215.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 36.43000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus i
19900.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 39.80000 lbs, total P/dry ton
39.80000 x 2.3 - 91.54000 lbs P205/dry ton
91.54000 x .5 - 45.77000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3800.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 7.60000 lbs total K/dry ton
7.60000 x 1.2 - 9.12000 lbs K20/dry ton
9.12000 x .5 0 4.56000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 04/01/98 To: 04/30/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) +
.20(56900.00000 mg/kg - 23700.00000 mg/kg) +
.20(33200.00000 mg/kg) +
6640.00000 mg/kg +
30419.00000 mg/kg x .002
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
1.00(23700.00000) mg/kg + 79.00000 mg/kg
23700.00000 + 79.00000 mg/kg
23779.00000 mg/kg
60.83800 lbs/dry ton
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(56900.00000 mg/kg - 23700.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(23700.00000) mg/kg + 79.00000 mg/kg
.20(33200.00000 mg/kg) + 11850.00000 + 79.00000 mg/kg
6640.00000 mg/kg + 11929.00000 mg/kg
18569.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 37.13800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
20100.00000 mg/kg x
.002
= 40.20000
lbs. total P/dry ton
40.20000 x
2.3
- 92.46000
lbs P205/dry ton
92.46000 x
.5
- 46.23000
lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
4800.00000 mg/kg x
.002 -
9.60000
lbs total K/dry ton
9.60000 x
1.2 -
11.52000
lbs K20/dry ton
11.52000 x
.5 -
5.76000
lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 05/01/98 To: 05/31/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(56900.00000 mg/kg - 23700.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(23700.00000) mg/kg + 79.00000 mg/kg
.20(33200.00000 mg/kg) + 23700.00000 + 79.00000 mg/kg
6640.00000 mg/kg + 23779.00000 mg/kg
30419.00000 mg/kg x .002 m 60.83800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(56900.00000 mg/kg - 23700.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(23700.00000) mg/kg + 79.00000 mg/kg
.20(33200.00000 mg/kg) + 11850.00000 + 79.00000 mg/kg
6640.00000 mg/kg + 11929.00000 mg/kg
18569.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 37.13800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus 1
20100.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 40.20000 lbs. total P/dry ton
40.20000 x 2.3 - 92.46000 lbs P205/dry ton
92.46000 x .5 - 46.23000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
4800.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 9.60000 lbs total K/dry ton
9.60000 x 1.2 - 11.52000 lbs K20/dry ton
11.52000 x .5 = 5.76000 lbs'/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 06/01/98 To: 06/30/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) +
.20(54900.00000 mg/kg - 26200.00000 mg/kg) +
.20(28700.00000 mg/kg) +
5740.00000 mg/kg +
32134.00000 mg/kg x .002
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3)
.20(54900.00000 mg/kg - 26200.00000 mg/kg)
.20(28700.00000 mg/kg)
5740.00000 mg/kg
19034.00000 mg/kg x '.002
Plant Available Phosphorus
1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
1.00(26200.00000) mg/kg + 194.00000 mg/kg
26200.00000 + 194.00000 mg/kg
26394.00000 mg/kg
64.26800 lbs/dry ton
+ 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
+ 0.50(26200.00000) mg/kg + 194.00000 mg/kg
+ 13100.00000 + 194.00000 mg/kg
+ 13294.00000 mg/kg
38.06800 lbs/dry ton
16700.00000 mg/kg x
.002
= 33.40000
lbs. total P/dry ton
33.40000 x
2.3
- 76.82000
lbs P205/dry ton
76.82000 x
.5
- 38.41000
lbs/dry ton ,
Plant Available Potassium
3500.00000 mg/kg x
.002
- 7.00000
lbs total K/dry ton
7.00000 x
1.2
- 8.40000
lbs K20/dry ton
8.40000 x
.5
- 4.20000
lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
.PERMIT WQ001989
From: 07/01/98 To: 07/31/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(54900.00000 mg/kg - 26200.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(26200.00000) mg/kg + 194.00000 mg/kg
.20(28700.00000 mg/kg) + 26200.00000 + 194.00000 mg/kg
5740.00000 mg/kg + 26394.00000 mg/kg
32134.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 64.26800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(54900.00000 mg/kg - 26200.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(26200.00000) mg/kg + 194.00000 mg/kg
.20(28700.00000 mg/kg) + 13100.00000 + 194.00000 mg/kg
5740.00000 mg/kg + 13294.00000 mg/kg
19034.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 38.06800 lbs/dry .ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
16700.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 33.40000 lbs. total P/dry ton '•
33.40000 x 2.3 - 76.82000 lbs P205/dry ton
76.82000 x .5 - 38.41000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3500.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 7.00000 lbs total K/dry ton
7.00000 x 1.2 - 8.40000 lbs K20/dry ton
8.40000 x .5 - 4.20000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 08/01/98 To: 08/31/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(0.00000 mg/kg - 0.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(0.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(0.00000 mg/kg) + 0.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
0.00000 mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
0.00000 mg/kg x .002 ® 0.00000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(0.00000 mg/kg - 0.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(0.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(0.00000 mg/kg) + 0.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
0.00000 mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
0.00000 mg/kg x .002 = 0.00000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
0.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 0.00000 lbs. total P/dry ton
0.00000 x 2.3 - 0.00000 lbs P205/dry ton
0.00000 x .5 - 0.00000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
0.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 0.00000 lbs total K/dry ton
0.00000 x 1.2 - 0.00000 lbs K20/dry ton
0.00000 x .5 - 0.00000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 09/01/98 . To: 09/30/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) +
.20(60200.00000 mg/kg - 24900.00000 mg/kg) +
.20(35300.00000 mg/kg) +
7060.00000 mg/kg +
31960.00000 mg/kg x .002
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) +
.20(60200.00000 mg/kg - 24900.00000 mg/kg) +
.20(35300.00000 mg/kg) +
7060.00000 mg/kg +
19510.00000 mg/kg x .002 -
1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
1.00(24900.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
24900.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
24900.00000 mg/kg
63.92000 lbs/dry ton
0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
0.50(24900.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
12450.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
12450.00000 mg/kg
39.02000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
18100.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 36.20000 lbs, total P/dry ton
36.20000 x 2.3 - 83.26000 lbs P205/dry ton
83.26000 x .5 - 41.63000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3200.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 6.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
6.40000 x 1.2 - 7.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
7.68000 x .5 - 3.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 10/01/98 To: 10/31/98
* NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(60200.00000 mg/kg - 24900.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(24900.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(35300.00000 mg/kg) + 24900.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
7060.00000 mg/kg + 24900.00000 mg/kg
31960.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 63.92000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(60200.00000 mg/kg - 24900.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(24900.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(35300.00000 mg/kg) + 12450.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
7060.00000 mg/kg + 12450.00000 mg/kg
19510.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 39.02000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
18100.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 36.20000 lbs. total P/dry ton
36.20000 x 2.3 - 83.26000 lbs P205/dry ton
83.26000 x .5 m 41.63000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3200.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 6.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
6.40000 x 1.2 - 7.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
7.68000 x .5 = 3.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 11/01/98 To: 11/30/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(54200.00000 mg/kg - 22300.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(22300.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(31900.00000 mg/kg) + 22300.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
6380.00000 mg/kg + 22300.00000 mg/kg
28680.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 57.36000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(54200.00000 mg/kg - 22300.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(22300.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(31900.00000 mg/kg) + 11150.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
6380.00000 mg/kg + 11150.00000 mg/kg
17530.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 35.06000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
16500.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 33.00000 lbs. total P/dry ton
33.00000 x 2.3 - 75.90000 lbs P205/dry ton
75.90000 x .5 - 37.95000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3200.00000 mg/kg x .002 0 6.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
6.40000 x 1.2 - 7.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
7.68000 x .5 - 3.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Digester Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 11/01/98 To: 11/30/98
* NUTRIENTS*
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(39400.00000 mg/kg - 11000.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(11000.00000) mg/kg + 29.00000 mg/kg
.20(28400.00000 mg/kg) + 11000.00000 + 29.00000 mg/kg
5680.00000 mg/kg + 11029.00000 mg/kg
16709.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 33.41800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(39400.00000 mg/kg - 11000.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(11000.00000) mg/kg + 29.00000 mg/kg
.20(28400.00000 mg/kg) + 5500.00000 + 29.00000 mg/kg
5680.00000 mg/kg + 5529.00000 mg/kg
11209.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 22.41800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
7900.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 15.80000 lbs. total P/dry ton '.
15.80000 x 2.3 - 36.34000 lbs P205/dry ton
36.34000 x .5 - 18.17000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
700.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 1.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
1.40000 x 1.2 = 1.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
1.68000 x .5 - 0.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Digester Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 12/01/98 To: 12/31/98
* NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(39400.00000 mg/kg - 11000.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(11000.00000) mg/kg + 29.00000 mg/kg
.20(28400.00000 mg/kg) + 11000.00000 + 29.00000 mg/kg
5680.00000 mg/kg + 11029.00000 mg/kg
16709.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 33.41800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(39400.00000 mg/kg - 11000.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(11000.00000) mg/kg + 29.00000 mg/kg
.20(28400.00000 mg/kg) + 5500.00000 + 29.00000 mg/kg
5680.00000 mg/kg + 5529.00000 mg/kg
11209.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 22.41800 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
7900.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 15.80000 lbs. total P/dry ton
15.80000 x 2.3 = 36.34000 lbs P205/dry ton
36.34000 x .5 - 18.17000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
700.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 1.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
1.40000 x 1.2 - 1.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
1.68000 x .5 - 0.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Roanoke Rapids Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 12/01/99 To: 12/31/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(54200.00000 mg/kg - 22300.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(22300.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(31900.00000 mg/kg) + 22300.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
- 6380.00000 mg/kg + 22300.00000 mg/kg
28680.00000 mg/kg x .002 = 57.36000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(54200.00000 mg/kg - 22300.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(22300.00000) mg/kg + 0.00000 mg/kg
.20(31900.00000 mg/kg) + 11150.00000 + 0.00000 mg/kg
6380.00000 mg/kg + 11150.00000 mg/kg
17530.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 35.06000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
16500.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 33.00000 lbs. total P/dry ton
33.00000 x 2.3 - 75.90000 lbs P205/dry ton
75.90000 x .5 = 37.95000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
3200.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 6.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
6.40000 x 1.2 - 7.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
7.68000 x .5 - 3.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ROANOKE RAPIDS
Dewatered Waste Treatment Plant
PERMIT WQ001989
From: 12/01/98 To: 12/31/98
** NUTRIENTS **
Plant Available Nitrogen (Injection)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 1.00(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(21500.00000 mg/kg - 1000.00000 mg/kg) + 1.00(1000.00000) mg/kg + 25.00000 mg/kg
.20(20500.00000 mg/kg) + 1000.00000 + 25.00000 mg/kg
4100.00000 mg/kg + 1025.00000 mg/kg
5125.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 10.25000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Nitrogen (Surface)
.20(TKN - NH3) + 0.50(NH3) + NO3 + NO2
.20(21500.00000 mg/kg - 1000.00000 mg/kg) + 0.50(1000.00000) mg/kg + 25.00000 mg/kg
.20(20500.00000 mg/kg) + 500.00000 + 25.00000 mg/kg
4100.00000 mg/kg + 525.00000 mg/kg
4625.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 9.25000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Phosphorus
7600.00000 mg/kg x .002 - 15.20000 lbs. total P/dry ton !
15.20000 x 2.3 - 34.96000 lbs P205/dry ton
34.96000 x .5 - 17.48000 lbs/dry ton
Plant Available Potassium
700.00000 mg/kg x .002 = 1.40000 lbs total K/dry ton
1.40000 x 1.2 = 1.68000 lbs K20/dry ton
1,68000 x .5 - 0.84000 lbs/dry ton
Print Date: 03/17/99

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: r
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
CALEDONIA PRISON
P.O. BOX 137
TILLERY NC 27887
252-826-5621
Existing poultry La
60000 head
Anaerobic
Irrigation
9
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the was is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in,implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil ypes are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4.1 Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

� s•, ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum -range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
60000
head x tons waste/head/year = tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
60000 head x *084lbs PAN/head/year = 5039.4 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of.waste is a big job. You should plan time.
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

r ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
4485
3304
86
StB
FP
3.0
150
0
29.9
I
SEPT-MAY
3304
3304
3304
3304
3304
3304
3304
3304
3304
3304
81 IStB
-81 StB
60 StB
-60 StB
-60 StB
-60 StB
28 StB
tB
-28 IStB
-28 StB
END
BH
I6.3
1315
10
SG
29
49.3
0
I
SB
40
40
0
I
CO
900
0
I
1108
C
120
0
I
1150
SG
29
49.3
0
I
SB
40
40
0
I
CO
0
I
1900
1108
C
120
0
I
1150
SG
129
149.3 1
0
I
I
36.4 111466
APR-SEPT
36.4 11794.52
NOV-APR
14.0 1560
JUN-AUG
14.0 1512
APR-AUG
14.0 12100
MAR-JUN
14.0 1690.2
NOV-APR
4.8 1192
JUN-AUG
4.8 1518.4
APR-AUG
4.8 1720
MAR-JUN
4.8 1236.64
NOV-APR
TOTAL
Page: 3

L, ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals. .
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
NOTE: SOME FIELDS ARE SHOWN WITH A (ti) AND THESE FIELDS ARE PART OF
THE NORMAL CROPPING ROTATION. THESE FIELDS MAY BE PLANTED WITH
ANY ONE OF THESE CROPS, AND THE NUTIENT UPTAKE WILL HAVE TO BE
ACCOUNTED FOR THAT PARTICULAR CROP.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTALI0
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height'of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain.for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
the following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
CO
COTTON
POUNDS
0.12
FP
TALL FESCUE -GRAZED
TONS
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
1.0
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
1.7
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
85.1
0
85.1
*** BALANCE
LBS AW N USED
0
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.

0
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface, irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
3304
28
StB
SB
0.5
*1.0
3304
60
StB.
SB
0.5
*1.0
3304
81
StB
BH
0.5
*1.0
3304
86
StB
FP
0.5
*1.0
3304
728
StB
C
0.5
*1.0
3304
'28
StB
CO
0.5
*1.0
T 17

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3304
`28
StB
SG
0.50
*1.0
3304
760
StB
C
0.5
*1.0
3304
�60
StB
CO
0.5
*1.0
3304
"60
StB
SG
0.50
*1.0
3304
"81
StB
SG
0.5
*1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00-
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Tom, ....- . r%

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that.is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10..Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25'feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by.a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways,.waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if .
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.•
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:CALEDONIA PRISON
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review'by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CALEDON A PRISON
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(If different rom owner):_
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)John Y Clark
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-583-3481
Address (Agency): Post Office Box 8
Halifax NC 27839-0008
Signature: J Date: 1ZgZ29
Paae: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)

t
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
My commission expires
(SEAL)
19
day of
Notary Public.
Panes 1.4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division�of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
19
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

All,
7axns
In 'v-
A
f
19L
�t" 1A
kk-
I

.��� - ,•� `� .� r��c� ` \ � � !lam \ `�,\ r`^_' \
•. :. •� 't,Qv. �.w iU.`'I;" / •^mil 3 rJ -''1 y� �. �,� / \
J.
467
� i
Nw
,x ggp,Le
Yf a'� n tj` r ,tia r � %•��1.. "r ..� � s� '' / R
��,• L... it 11 - - , ' �'�
vile A
l p kr.
:� -. ! �'�. - _ i , ;. /! Y�•. - 1 �\ �� t_t�. ems: .... � $' ;.';4- -:�
PI
67
CG

.� • �d�1 I l . F
� Is
11'
i�� ° '�^��+ . `. f � �i •�?pal'` A� ��� 11
r "ji}'f ,. +�r•�'(��'�i� � ��`ti� '�-.„�'T � � �• � : � a =' ar�a .�.. a_�. 1��.,,•�.. �..��.,�y-','��•'� II,
'It
r
\yo
# ark
n
V
1- v

-7 77-
4
10
ro
Expost&re

31�
fj
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
: tlA

�77.

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Cause
11MI's to Cou(rol Insects Site Specific Practices
_
1.14111111 Systems
Hudl (i1111C1 S
• Accumulation of Solids
Flush system is designed and operated
stlfticiemly to remove accumulated solids front
gutters as designed.
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids -it
- - - -
— �s4barge
- - - -
k1gwuls and I'ils
Crusted Solids
Maintain lagoons, scaling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize [lie
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Exces�'We VCgoilive
Decuying vegcialion
Maintain vegetative control along banks of
I iru�� lh
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
0 Deed Spillage Design, operate and maintain feed syslems
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
"ecumulaliun of decaying wastage.
W-Cican up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during sunuucr; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
I.cc', SiMil .e 0 Accumulations of feed residues RMIUCC moisture accumulation wilhin and
amend im medialc perimeter of tixti slor.%c
areas by insuring drainage away from site
anlVor providing adc(Itmic containment
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
j�Inisture grain producls).
M Inspect ror and remove or break up-uccumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
AN1I • - V14-C-11cl 11. 1'►'H6, I'31;C I

Jllllrl'L• CUUSe
Animal I Wiling Areas Accumulations ofanintal wastes _ [j
and feed wastage
n
f)ry hL'ulluc I L11111ling • Accumulations of animal wastes 1`3
Systcnu
n
Cl
BMPs to Conlral Insects- Sitc Specific Practices
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filler strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
ncc(led).
Remove spillage on a routine busis (e.g., 7 - 10 '
clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accuntulaled
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
1'or more inllrnwaion contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Npartntcnt of Entomology, [lox 7613, North Carolina State l luivershy,
Raleigh. N(", 2769i-7613. .
ANIIC :nlllcr 11, 1996, Page 2

--&a hTL-Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
tiuurce
—
cause
11119I's to Mluilnize 011111r Site Specific Practices
I ;unute;ul--
Swine production
n
Vegetative or wooded buffers; ---
n
Recommended best management practices;
n
Gond judgment and common sense
Aoiolal body surfaces
0 Dirty manure-comed animals
Cl
Dry floors .
I loor�ml:�cc�0
wet manure -covered floors
Cl
Slotted floors;
n
Walcrcrs located over slotted floors;
n
Feeders at high end of solid floors;
n
Scrape manure buildup from floors;
n
Underfloor ventilation for drying
ALuulre cuncCllult bits
& Ifrinc;
n
Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge.
• Partial microbial decomposition
or scrape;
Cl
Underfloor ventilation
vc,llil.1ii4111 cxhil l falls
volatile bases;
n
ran maintenance;
nest
n
Efficient air movement
1111loor sot faccs
a Dust
Cl
Washdown between groups of animals;
n
feed aridiiives;
n
Feeder covers;
n
Feed delivery downspout cxlenders to feeder
covers
I'lun.h t.uil.s
Agitation of recycled lagoon
[l
blush lank covers;
hilitid while tanks are fining
n
I'smcnd fill lines to near bollom oriai&s with
anti -siphon vents
I:luNII alleys
0 Agitation during waslewater
n
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
I'll IcrII.ul;c Iloiuts
0 Agitation of recycled lagoon
n
Extend recharge lines to near bouonl of pits
liquid while pill are filling
wilh anti -siphon vents
I:il-1 Nlalions
aAgitation during sump Tank
CI
Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown
olltsitic Jr;Iin collection
Agitation during waslewater
n
Ilox covers
or jllnclion boxes
conveyance
ANV IC - I-111-1lbcr 11. 1996, Page

Source
Cruse
nMPs to Allaiutize Odor Sile Specific Practices
find of drainpipes at
Agitation during wastewater
n extend discharge point of pipes undl:rneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
Volatile gas emissions;
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
t Correct lagoon startup procedures;
'
Agltauolt
R" inimum surface area -to* -volume ratio;
C1 Minimum agitation when.pumping;
CI Mechanical aeration;
n Proven biological additives
Irrigalion sprinkler
t ligh pressure agitation;
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
na�ulcs
Wind drift
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
Cei' Pump frnm second -stage lagoon
SimaLc lack ur basin
Parllal llrlcrobiul decomposilion;
n Ilotioni or midlevel loading;
sill lace •
Mixing While filling;
n Tank covers;
•
Agllallon wheal Clnplying
n Basin surface mats of solids;
L"1 Proven biological adifilim or oxidants
Sclllnlg haslal sm mike •
Paiiial microbial decomposidon;
C7 Extend drainpipe otnlets undcrnealh liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
C7 Remove seeded solids regularly
t`I:uuare flurry ur sludge •
Agitation when spreading:
L1 Soil injection of shiny/sludges;
spreader outicls 0
Volalile gas emissions
O Wash residual manure from spreader after use:
M Proven biological additives or oxidants
l Ina,vered m:ulilre,
Volatile gas emissions while
O
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
Cl
Soil incorporation wilhin 48 firs.;
surfaces
1.1
Spread in thin unirornt layers for rapid drying;
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxillanls
Dead animals
Carcass decomposition
Proper disposition orcarcasses
Dead :uaivaal di.pus:ll
Caress deconlposilion
n
Complete covering or carcasses in burial pin;
bits
O
I ,roper location/constntctinn ordisposal pits
Incincl:llill s
Incomplete colnlwstion
Secondary stack burners
ANV ivemlicr 11. 1996, Page it

Sn11rce
ra�wo
Cause
f, ;I•.;..g . UILI aJuuuu • Improper drainage;
IIMPc in Mi..;... .,e n.�....
Grade and landscape such that, water drains
ail Itl" . Microbial decomposilion of away from facilities
organic matter
Almillrc hacked only a I'oarly maintained access roads Nunn access road muinlenance
Illlblic roads linnl farm
access
Site Sl►ecific 11radices
Addilional Information :
Available From :
Swine Al;ulur.: blanal;culent ; 0200 Rule/I1MP Packcl
Swim Production Fanu Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; FBAE Fact Sheet NCSI I. Counly Extension Center
NCSIJ - IIAE
Swine Prnduclion Facility Manurc Management: Pit 11ccllarge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAC 128-88 NCSIJ - 11A1:
Swine Production Facility Manurc Management: Underfloor flush - Lagoon Trealmeni ; C11AE 129-88 NCSIJ - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; r11AR 103-83 NCSIJ - I IA E
Calibration of Manurc and Wastewater Application L(hnpinclll ; CDAG fact Shed NCSIJ - IIAE
Cuutrulling Odors from Swine Iluildings ; PH I-33 NCSIJ - Swine [extension
Euvimnmcnull Assurance Program ; Nl,PC Manual NC fork Producers Assoc
Olrtimis I'or Managing Odor ; a repon Isom the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSII Agri Unnnuulir.,tinns
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and flies ; PROW. 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AtM 1(: - Ilovcm1scl 11, 1996, 11.ige 5

E1\1ER GEN CY
ACTION PLAN
PH \ `Z1"vIBERS
DWQ (Gle, - 5-7/ — y7 0 0
i,:.; E.'IERGEVCY NI.-\:NAGEME.N-T SYSTEM 15;10- Sf S"- Z 03 /
SWCD
� r ,� , ,. •ii. r^�' 1V-RCS.;:�9i9):SR3-3`�g/
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave vour property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen.- This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed befow.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor. -
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. In'corporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close %,aJ'ves to eliminate further dis:harge.
d. Repair all leeks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from Flush systems. houses.:olld separators -action ine!ude:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irri__atian pump.
c. Make sure no :Iphon occurs.
d. Stop ,:II tlo%% ; in the house. tlusi <� items. Or s.`li.l :epura(ors,

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
• Engineer. etc.)
a. Name: D A I�/ge S
b. Phone: r7/1) - 5,f3 — 3 y
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage. repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

N-lortality Management i\'Iethods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
.I Burial three feet beneath the surface of the eround within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowinL,
stream or public body of water. "
=� Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
In the_ case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and desien
approved by the Department of Agnculture
=� Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

J4
System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average
«� operating conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge
rates and application rates change over time as equipment gets older
and components wear. In particular, pump wear tends to reduce
operating pressure and flow. With continued use, nozzle wear results
in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application rate, diameter of
_ coverage, and subsequently the application uniformity. For example,
operating the system with excessive pressure results in smaller
droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase.
Plugged intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating
pressure. Operating below design pressure greatly reduces the
coverage diameter and application uniformity.
For the above reasons, you should calibrate your equipment on a
regular basis to ensure proper application rates and uniformity.
Calibration at least once every three years is recommended.
Calibration involves o %cting an measuring flow at several
locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be
used to collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain
gauges work best because they already have a graduated scale from
which to read the application amount without having to perform
additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets, jars, or
anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used
provided the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled
container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located
randomly throughout the application area at several distances from
sprinklers. For traveling guns, sprinklers should be located along a
transect per a icular to the direction of pull. Set out collection
container 25 feet a art long the transect on both sides of the gun
cart. You s ould compute the average application rate for all
collection containers. You should also look for evidence of
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation
between containers of more than 30 percent is cause for concern.
You should contact your irrigation dealer or technical specialist
for assistance.

%•f./i„ ,..-„ ..., ., .; ; .: •rti.' iuti �t OQ. �� hi..i% •'_({W� "/t9.t?N' � it 'a r1 y S�W r�[r
1 A i
t
�S. Department of Agriculture111
~ �A14k~ATM `
NC-ENG-34 ,
.'Soil Conservation Service September,.1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR.DAMS.t"r`
Landowner ('alAn�ania �rSon t=ar.» county.—. yi1 /, , y' .
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No. — -
5"¢0-. 4sS /o&-estpt a/an9
Estimated Depth of Water to'Top of Dam '.5 Ft. Length of Flood Pool., 3 5/' Ft r
Date of Field Hazard Investigation '7/dy/94,
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to"the point of estimated minor effect,,..._-,-,,
from sudden dam, failure.
Est. Elev. s evation
• Kind.of . .:Improvements ' of .Breach ;},r•
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: • Land Use ' 'Improvements, 'Above.'.4 •Floodwater Above .; v
:"Flood `Plain• `Flood'Pl:ain
Ft. . Ft. . ; Ft
• '1 t.n
3
Describe, potential for loss of life and damage `to< existing or, probable , future downstream „
improvements -from a sudden breach d'` �`.`;, fi'�,/` -fir l0
/57SN
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b., �c) (see NEM-Part 520.'21) Q
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V) 7-r
c
�,�,. CSC Y
B Date
me ti t e .." •; •
Concurred By. C .. �:f Date
na title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach• additional sheets as needed.
• 1

at+;r
• • •-•
The. purpose of,,this. plan •is,,,to:rprovide. guidelines for carrying out
the routine'.operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste "management . r.jsystem;:.function'ing•.,as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered..`to be'normal good"'care'of the system. Good
maintenance='adds:;,to, beauty,,!usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance:::;
The routinec.,maintenance;:,of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance",of a.vegetative cover on the embankment top and
side slopes: FESCUE is
being established on;;;these jareas.,,,.IBeginning.:in)Il9.96,:;;and
each', year 6thereafter y ` ;the?!;embankment.,,-. shou ld :,ber;ferti1ized '?',
with+:,800:_poundst.ofr410-10=10. �per,',acret:to; maintain a.',vigorous
stand.
2: Control4'of;;brush;,,;and;�trees ion:•:the;�embankment-. , I.This<t,mayj be
done. by mowing,....
owing,... spraying;! or :chopping,', or a 'combination -of
all three. LThisJ,will`„need' :.to,,be:'.done,j•atr least ;once ;each
year•:and possibly",=twice-�.in'.-years favorabler+to;•.heavy;:growth,...,
of -;vegetation. t.:,`, 4,
V��:: !...4t Y• ai'i� %�'.�.t '•')'. �1 � .i.i:?•;. ¢: +: (: '�R Cal: t:: V C: 17. i'•i; .. ?..7i., •a:i !.. :.'i s �`. .
Maintenances;inspections'.: ofvthe�lagoon;, shouldcbe•,-,made.;;during-the..
initial„..filling;:.ofc; the lagoon ''.andratsleast, monthly. ;iItems -..,to'.,be
checked should L,include, 1'as:�•a" minimum, Mahe ,following: ;;:-
'' i' {, �".i�?t"Ptits';T;��'S,i•:. �71i�•.'.�{��;:r�. ',�.i.�,C,tSU�; a ^q%'1a. vr� i;::� :-�:. :� i;. - 1
1. Waste;: InletlPipes, �Recycling,' Pipes, ;-and Overflow ;Pipes}....: ,
.. iY: i'-. ,' �,:.t.. i26'. ;)',�.: vl %'^t";<r` �G.A�liz fP :'!' .,1 t;J � is _. .. "1-.. 1 !'•
a;:::.;separation oft:joints,1'...:,::.
b. , '.cracksr.or;P�breaks;:Y, .:. ;y•9;: is ,.
c:.�%:Iaccumulationrof salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2,. Lagoon -:surface::
a,: ; f;;undesirable,nvegetative: growth; •
b:..-:floating!:,or,�lodged debris;
3. Embankment ;!
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b.,; side.•., slope t'stabilityi:-_(slumps: or; bulges
c. t:4::wet';or "damp; -;areas;. on,-,the"-,,back,•slope,:
d-. •, }.. erosion •i due, to'•' lack of - vegetation or as a..result of
.wave,,action..
e:.I . rodent..: damage
1

y:.i r t an, �. t.. ,... j: .ad•:: 3lti 1�. Err F7',}"t •' N�Ia C r,t .`,.;ti tfi,el, ',y'^1. Kai i c�•, 4v.•;..a -, •,:
4 . Transfer:�Pump � s recycling d U Elanr,,igation : pumps �, w,• 1+•� : ; �,
a.:,_i overall: pumpzoperation-,'{j. : ...;;
• b.; �t.i,,leaks �r2"<i�i.d�C ���: is {,�i Y�7,j,p di nr .x f ;i'. '. .. ' .'7'• F .
c.yydz lloose;c:,fittings'...,~ .c,�4 ;.;: c� +gat •,7'..x ; �:;.:� �.,
tii / rii'.: !.- .. ,.. ii. `S '4,�:��i1 �:.�: i.r; l��'� t"'i3i, ti'F.?'i 1:};" Y i?•. �` i:. .1 1 .. .. ,.. ,.. '
5. Surface , water, diversion,:,,,
a.. z� % adequate..;.vegetation
b. divers ion'',capacity:
c. t.,,:ridge;:berm height r,3 t;:',,,
' ?.b�l,n' .:,:'�.. �J,.�-•gip � c�i f'�t �,v � '�i iFaiYr}'{.- tt fts q{y,F 1. � �� } i i! ..1'•j -' 1.":,. .. � `...
B. Oberatiorrtgrr+ew
C, t'l : 31 is A.
..: Your,tanimal�cwaste;;management.:facil`ityc:was designed(,.*-for�'a-
total ::.oVt,:60, :000 ?;layers: -.,NV The,,,lagoon contains ; both ; permanent
and:.,temporaryi:storage. ,Therjpermanent :•storage, is `,not to be'
pumped.�iin•torder'-to ensure thatranaerobicractiontwill -.occur.
The; design storage �include's apermanent':: storage... of, two,, and
one half cubic- foots ert' oundiof stead ,state Wive wei ht
ivaj! ff�►r�.}'d"'fia��i 3i�iw��`�p' ?w�e�x,!" "� q 'r°(: ti'';iC1(�r'iC:','2: C";!1�1
The;t^temporary storage portion .of;.the ;i,lagoon . includes
<capacity: for,:the;rvolume' of, produced''over180*.'days,, the
amount of: rainfalTC in,a��25 year�'24,-hour,;: storm ,,event,' excess.
water, ,'and rainfall ingexcess,of.�:'evaporation: Your. facility
is 'designed :'for,,' 180's days of 'temporary*;storage, : ;' therefore;
it will: need
t t,obe:i;pumpedk`everyft`six:H;months`.. ,.'Begin'. pump -out' .
of `.theaelevation'•.-.51.:7,;-as;marked
by
r<; `r , e,, permanent;r.markers.' Stop��pump-$out whenr,the.',fluid;.:level
r� e'I-started''',hesFelevatipbr'stopped.reac
at ;any time,between,rttiie,�se'�PtwoFes.l:
eevations for:operating .
convenience: as,: -`site �Iconditions:,permit,' such as weather, .
soils, crop, and:'"equipment>°<<in'order to apply waste without
i runoff or leaching..
The attached.1waste management,plan must be followed. This
plan.'*recommends sampling'c�,and .;testing' of waste (see
Attachment:B) before•land.::applicatfon. The waste material
should be analyzed before";,.each;application cycle to
determine its•nutrient:content. A soil test of the area of
application.should''be:made:'annually to insure the waste is
a liedas reasonably -and and pp .y' practically possible to
recommended:rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be,precharged with a volume of
water equal''to one-half:,of.:`.the; treatment volume before
-', wastes are introduced. •:Precharging reduces the
concentration of the•initial':waste entering the lagoon
thereby reducing odors. Solids.should be covered with
effluent"at all times.
2

.,..--Pipes that,"are ;,used'°for recycling;;effluent-, to use ;as flush
water ,..and'4irrigation. 'intakes',must-tbe.'_placed 18..inches below
the surface and as far from the inlet pipes as possible in
order to provide a cleaner effluent for flushing and to
reduce odors when irrigating,,on;land. When these pipes are
placed through the embankment, they should be installed no
more than two:.feet below top of dike;and not in the highest
section of fill. The:pipe trench should be compacted with
clay material.
After five years the waste treatment lagoon must be checked
for sludge..accumulation annually. If sludge has encroached
into the.;treatment;volume,. the,vsludge must be removed and
applied at';agronomic rates!based on -analysis of the sludge.
Treatment volume must•havela,minimum of 4 feet of depth free
of sludge at, all times.
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) in North Carolina revised water quality regulations
that address animal operations. These rules became
effective on..February•,1, .•.1993,'! (15A NCAC •2H .0200) . This
,, .animal-operationrshall;•be operated within the requirements
, ., of these rules, . and regulations.
3

M
rn
-n -s 0
4 v,
, t
Ar
vy '4
p
I
a

-T,
7

1
'• . r.0 y•
P 4►`y0fk
b �'::
•F''. ,�,� � .:?Y. -c— Ss!,r•t. \� 11
h Vim• "A�'�,b�~MoonIt -
� r.,.... .:," c�y"'�"',•� .1 •'ate• •+ '�
•F+�•4
Y
V 1�, r a,, w at, , ..� a'j �:NS•I � � . ' ip r,. �, •hi
.y�k n•�i•Rir _,._ , - f � �y: � tili ' A`,��' I I ti1',�j�,�J,
•L��•m•; !r ' rr.,;�,••.`�.�3�F��i,•�,. ... �'1 �y�4h�' y,_ ,•t 1 I
I,,..- - _ _• _-_ - - n_w � _ ._......._�.. ._ .. _..------...._----•- - caw � 1
i .� 1• , II � I I .. '.•fy��Jir�tll i:�'•�2.�. I � I
nb��`

ILI"
- S
Jill'
LY 44-
Pmi
. VJ4
lt
QL
77-7-
rf
IN,
44 at
Fo.irft\.S

}.. { •rat• �.�t� ''1���• �', � �
IL
1X. j
'.�
7�a,.,{.,}c�''�:�� %•� i,,� �. .t. ...y�'T �t", St'kr':f. �.,,. � ��• !� � Iti'•i �i;�'. •M`•y.
/_.'.'f--_ s;.i• '•l I�i�%��k.>.� i+. `�•/Yr"''.•+..'I_� :v A 1:1w/:w!•f:.."�.�. Y 1�: .:�

V

a,w STATE 4tio
41
F
North Carolina Department of Correction `v�°fV� oFF�oF
Michael F. Easley
Governor
March 19, 2003
Mr. J. D. Hester
Enterprise Farms
PO Box 67 • Caledonia Drive • Tillery, NC 27887
NC Dept. of Environmental and
Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Hester:
On March 6, 2003, Mr. Mann with the Halifax Natural Resource Conservation Service
made a site visit to our lagoons to ensure adequate amount of freeboard. Mr. Mann
determined after a visual inspection that we were in no danger of exceeding the flag.
After recent rains in the area and forecasts to receive more, we were very concerned
about our lagoons. Mr. Mann suggested that we slightly increase the holding capacity in
the two smaller lagoons. Thus, giving us a greater holding capacity in the larger lagoon
in case of an emergency or if additional rain occurred as forecasted.
Theodis Beck
Secretary
Mr. Mann suggested that we notify or inform Mr. Towell, which we did. Our
conversation was to inform only, not a plan of action. I informed Mr. Towell about our
amount of freeboard and that we were in no immediate danger of exceeding. Therefore, a
plan of action is not needed.
Sincerely,
Phillip C. Sykes
Enterprise Farm Manager
Telephone: [phone] An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer Fax: [phone]

Jul-08-2002 02:15pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P.001/012 F-070
0000Fo%I11 -11(04I
Facsiri�ile Cover
� sheet
E
.North Carolina Correction Enterprises
P
2020 Yonkers Road • P. 0. Box 29540
�QFCroN E���a�a\ Raleigh, NC 27626-0540
1-800-241-0124
TO: From:_ 0� ar�
Company: �/�'�/� Phone: (91 ) 71 .3600
Phone: 5'7 `f 70a Admin. Fax: [phone]
Fax: 521- `(2-1 Date: ' % $rt4-,�
Pages (including cover page) _
❑. Prepare reply for my signature ❑ Per our conversation ❑ Per your request
13 For your approvol Q For your comments For your information
❑ Signature ❑ For distribution
Comments:

Jul-08-2002 02:15pm
From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974
T-848 P.0021012 F-070
Michael F. Easley
Governor
Mr. J. D. Hester
NCDENR
Forth Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises
2020 Yonkers Rnad • 4240 MSC • RalFigh, North Carolina 27699.4240
Karen A. Brown
EnterpTiec Dirct:to r
July 8, 2002
Thcodi� Bcck
Secretary
Raleigh, North Carolina
SU13JECT: Hydraulic Oil Release at the North Carolina Correction Enterprise Caledonia Farm,
Tillery, NC,
Dear: Mr, Nester:
I = writing you regarding the hydraulic oil release at the N.C.C.E.. Caledonia )~arm located in Tillery,
N.C., on July 8, 2002. I have attached with this letter a copy of the e-mail forwarded to me by MT, Phil
Sykes, N_C.C,E. Farm Manager. It describes what was done in regards to contai=-imt and clean-up of
the released hydraulic oil. Also attached is a copy of the Material Safety Data Sheet for the chemical
released, Texaco 01893 TDH Oil.
I hope this information finds itself beneficial in regards to the hydraulic oil release and the action taken.
If you have any questions concerning this incident, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Si
Correction Enterprises
d j g/lrtters2002/#'ann01. dpc
CC: Plant File
CORRECTION
EN1Uf'RI5E5
wwvr.doC,8Mte,nc,us/uprije [phone]
Fax: [phone] Courier ff 53.71-00

Jul-08-2002 02:16pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P.0031012 F-070
From: Phillip Sykes
To: Douglas Gaylord
Date: 7/8/02 12:05PM
Subject: Hydraulic Spill on 7-8-02
A hydraulic line on a dump body trailer broke an released or spilled approximately 25 to 30 gallons of oil
onto the ground. The spill was contain with send being place around the area, Once contained, sand
was added to absorb the oil. The area approxiamtely 6 feet x 8 feet was removed to a depth of 6 to 8
inches and loaded onto a dump truck. The area was checked to ensure all soil in question was removed
before adding fill dirt and topping with stone, The contaminated soil was removed to an area (free from
runoff) an placed on plastic and covered. Once the soil is determined to be free of contaminates it will be
land applied, From time of spill to actual clean-up and removal was approximately two hours. Therp was
never any danger of the oil entering a waterway or ditch. I will be faxing you a copy of the MSDS for your
records. Any questions, please call. PHIL

Jul-08-2002 02:16pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9107163974 T-848 P.0041012 F-070
- „ • zsyad: 12-08-95
• TEXACO SWersear s : 07 -31-95
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SH91T
NOTE, Read and understana Material safety Data Shi4et gefore'handling or
disposing of product.
I. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND P E FI T21A
MATERIAL IDENTITY
Prpouci Coo@ and Neale:
01693 TPH OIL
Chemical Name and/or Famlly.or Doncrlption:
Torgve Fluid
MAnufacturerrs Name! and Aaoress:
TEXACO LUBRICANTS COMPANY
A DIVISION OF TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC.
P,O. pox 4421
Mcus2pn. Tx.7721q-.4427
TRleohone Numoers:
Transportation Emergency -Company
(914)
83.1-3400
CHEMTREC
(SDO)
424-8300
Health Emergency
-Company
(914)
831-3400
General MSDS Asel4tance
(914)
838-7304
TaYnnical Information
-Fuels
(914)
438-7336
-Chemical
(513)
450-6.543
-Lubricant/:
(800)
762-7862
Alit i freezes
1AdditiV4@
(713)
236-6278
-Solvents
(000)
e76-3738
'2 COMPOSITIQN/INFORMA ON o Na S
Tr- -InITE911- FOF,•LISTING CONPONEN S•IN TAR COMPOST ON SECTION 15 AS FOLLOWS:
C4RZINZGENS ARE LISTED WHEN PRESENT AT 0.1 % OR 042ATER: COMPONENTS WHICH ARE
CTr1L9:ISE MLZAR0005 ACCORDING TO OSHA ARE LISTED WHEN PRESENT AT 1.0 is OR
GFSATIR; NON-HAI,tRDOU$ COMPONENTS ARE LISTED AT 3.0 % OR GREATER. THIS IS NOT
IN'ENDED TC Be A CQMPLETC COMPOSITIONAL DISCLO$URE, REFER TO SECTION 14 FOR
APPLICABLE STATES* RIGHT TO KNOW AND OTHEP REGULATORY INFORMATION.
proaact anC'Or Compon6nt(sl Carcinogenic AcFprping to:
pshr. I4RC NTP OTHER NONE
X
composition: (Sequence Number and Chemical Name)
5®c Chemiga' Name CA$ Number
_Range in_'�
a Severe',, solvent refined, svtvent`deua>c®d
64742-65-0
35.00-49.99
neev, poraFflnic petroleum olstillaws
a $plvk'rt pRuaxeO lignt paraffinic petroleum
64742.5E-8
35,0C•48,80
F;t''letes
5 F ,.a-c,,r@ateq heavy paraffinic petroleum
64742-54-7
3.00-$,99
o�s-lllat®s
- 71rC ajKyl 0i1n10pn0sph81®
65549-42-3
1,00.2,68
1,00.2.99
CS - r,)d-0treato0 Ii9nt ndpntnenie petroleum
64742.53-6
1.00-2.98
01Gt111ater.
C" Meinac�)•lic ap,C, copolymer of "putyl•,
50667-5$-5
1.00-2.99
"louryl" and "Glearyl"eatere Witn
3-dlmethyl•afnlnbprOpylmethOCrylemld®
P,;Z':;CT I5 NCN•HAZARDOUS ACCORDING TO OSHA (1910,1200).
_aMPONENT IS hAZAROOUS ACCORDING TO OSHA,
• _3.%;PONENT. C' DEFINITION. IS CONSIDERED H42AR000$
ACCORDING TO
OSHA
S5Ct1JSE IT CARRIES THE PERMISSIBLE,exPOSVAE LIMIT
(PEL) FOR MINERAL OIL
:MCm5ure L,m,t� referenced cy Sequence Number in the Composition Section
Sep L,mi�
m� rr3 TWA -OSHA (MINERAL OIL MIST)
E' maim; TWA-ACGIH (MINERAL OIL MIST)
1 rr0%m3 $TEL ACGIH (MINERAL OIL MIST)
Mq'M3 TWA -OSHA (MINERAL OIL MIST)
C, mg,'rr3 TMIA-ACGIH (MINERAL •014 MIST)
PAGE: 1
N - N;," DETERMINED N.A. - NOT AP LICAOLE NIT, NOT STED
s LSSS THAN > - GREATER THAN''

Jul-08-2002 02.16pm from -NC Correotioil Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P 005/012 F-070
NAME: TDH GlL w ►� •�swa; llz-pe-Yp.
supersedes: 07.31-95
a. COMPOSITION/INFgRMATIP ON NOREPIENTS (CANT)
P� 10 Will-? STE( ACGIH (MINERAL OIL MIST
Oa 5 MQ/m3 TWA -OSHA (MINERAL OIL MIST)
C3 5 me/m3 TWA-ACGIH (MINERAL OIL MIST)
03 10 mo/T3 SYEL ACCIH (MINERAL OIL MIST)
03 B Mg!M3 TWA-OSH4 (MINERAL OIL MIST)
06 5 m9%m3 TWA-ACGIH (MINERAL OIL MIST)
00 10 Rip/m3 STEL ACGIH (MINERAL OIL MIST)
3', HAZAR0 PENT CA7 0
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW
Appearance:
Osrk red liquid
Ogor:
Po;rOlaum Oil odor
STATEMCWT
NOW CONSIDERED NECESSARY
HMIS
Health 1 RaaCtivity: o
F 1 amrr,ao i l l t> : 1 Spec i 81 ,-
PQTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS
NPPA
Health: t Reactivity: 0
Flammability: 1 Special • -
EYE SKIN INHALATION INGESTION
PriMpry Route of Exposure: 6 a I
EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE
Acute:
Eyes:
&:ay c41u66 minimal irritation, experiencoo as tamPorary discomfort,
Skin:
arse' Gpntdct mad cause slignt irritation. Prolonged contact, as with
clotr,ing we "Pa wltn material. may 'cause More severe irritation and dis-
comfort, seen as local redness and swelling.
GTne- tnar the po:antial Skin irritation pffeCte noted above, eCute (short
terms adverse effects orb not expected from brief Skin contact; 569 Other
V4fe_T5. below. ono SOCTiOM i1 for infOrmatlph regarding potentlal long
Lein effects.
Inhalation:
la.ors or mist, 11% exCeDs of permi W 010 Concentrations, or in unusuaity
r,)n- _oncer.trations gene^atea from sprayinP, heating the material or, as
41rcn exoo5w,e in poorly ventilated areas or confined Spar_e5, may cause
c` the nose and throat• headacha, nausea, and drowsiness.
Ingestion:
m,AE ;non several mow1rifuls are $*allowed, abdominal Discomfort, nausea,
an-- c+a-rhea ma, occur,
Sensitization Properties:
. r%O . M
Chronic:
N: adverse effects have been dpcumented in human$ as a reault of cnronic
erpcsure, SQcTIOr, 11 MAY Contain applicable Animal Coto.
Medical Conditions Aggravated C1y Exposure:
Ee�&.S@ of iTs irritating properties, repeat00 akin contact may Aggravpte
a e■ist,ng aormatitig (skin condition).
PAQ9; 7
N,C - NC' OE7ERM)NEG N.A. - NQT APPLICABLE N.T. - NCI TESTED
• i.E55 THAN > - GREATER THAN

Jul-08-2002 02:16pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P 006/012
PRODUCT cooE: 01F93 Date Issued: 12-o8-95
NAM@: TDH CIL SuWrseides: 07-31-95
F-070
�i
3. R4= IDENT ATIOH (Ca
other Remarks:
Material from high pressure equipment. pinhole leaks, or high praesyre line
failure can pgneTrate The 4kin and, if not properly Treated, can Cause
severe injury, including disfigurement, lobs of function, or even require
amputation of the affected area. To prevent such serlo4s injury.
immaaiatp meoio6l attention should be sought even if the injection Injury
appears to be minor.
linen overheated, proawct may ,release hydrogen sulfida IH2S) gas. H25
conpantratlons above permissible CoMeenTratfons Can cause irritation of the
eyes and respiratory tract, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting,
ctiairrhoa and pulmonary edema, 4t concentrations above 400 pprn, respiratory
paralysis. causing unConsciousne2s and death, can Occur.
4. FIRST AID MUSURES
Eyes;
Plush eyes with plenTy of water for se'verai minutes. GOT medical
ationxion if eye irritation persists.
Skin;
w'asn skin �'ilh plenty of soap and water for several minutes. Gat meoical
e;centlpn if sh,n irritation oevoloos or par6ista.
Ingestion:
if mere anon several moutrlfuls of -this material are asvallowed, give two
olasse5 of water (16 oz.). Get medical attention -
Inhalation:
:f irritation, neadac`ie. nausea. or arowolneas occurs, remove to fresri air.
Get meoical a:raniiOn if breatnIng becomes dif'fieult or reap iraTory
irritation persist®.
Other Instructions;
high pressure injection of material can cause severe injury. Failure to
oeoride the wowno of all residual material can result in disfigurement,
less of function. or, may require amputation of the affected area.
Pamove Ano or$—c'ieen or launder elathimQ Soaked or Boiled with this
malarial before reuse. Dry Cleaning of ConiaminaTeC Clothing may oe
more effective than normal laun0Vrin9, Inform Individuals reVpOnaiol" for
claaning of colenripl ha2aros 04VOCiated with hanating Contaminated
c�c-n�np,
S. FIRS-FICHTING MEASURES
I gn i t i on a-Ve>rature - A (degrees ):
Nc: deTe,minea.
Flash Point i0OgrRe5 F);
3E= i cc- i
Flammable Limits i%!:
„c-ier; NOT oeTerminaa.
uaDer NOT derorminea.
Reeommenosa Fire £Ytingwishtng Agents Aitd Special Proeaquresl
use waster spray. cry chemical, foam. or cilroon dioxide to extinguish
flames. use Later spray to cool fire-egaosed Containers• Water or
foam ma cause frotning.
Unusual or Expiosjve Hazards:
m1orogen swlfioe (H2S) may be released if overheated.
Extinguishing Media Which Must Not Be Used:
NO% oetermined,
special Protective Equipment for Firefighters:
Nz spe:lasl equipment or procedures requirad,
PAGE: 3
N.0 - NO' DETE2MINEp N.A. - NOT ♦PPLICASL N.T. � NOT TES E
< �FSS THAN > - GREATER THAN

Jul-08-2002 02:i6pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 91071639 74 ii>o��, >f7 8448e`85 0071012 F-070
yoxfNAME: TDH OTL Super efts: 07-31-PS �
6.. ACCIOE TA RELEAS ME UR ( rsnspar" ation Spll se: baWltc 30 424-tlioo)
Proce ures in Cass of AccTi4ent.11 Release, raskage or Leakage:
Ventilate area. Avoid prea,triing vapor, wear appropriate personal
protective Rquipment, including appropriate respiratory protection, Contain
spill if pgssiDIR. Wipe up or absorb on suitaclo material and shovel up. .
Prevent entry into sowers and waterways. Avoid Contact with skin, eyes or
s'lotn,ing
7. HANOL NG AND S ORAGE
mrocputions to be Taken in
Hanaling:
Minimum feasiole handling temperatures should by maintained.
Storage:
Perioqs of exposure to high temperatures ShOulO be minimized, Water
contamination shoulo ow avoided,
6, EXPOSURE CONTROLS/P SpNAL T CT ON
ProteCtive Equipment(Type)
Eye/Face Protection:
Safety slasses, chemical type goggles. or face shield reaamMandoo To
prevprt eye contact,
Skin Protection:
wDrpe-6 sroulo brash exposes skin several times doily with soap and water.
So,iao work Clothing snoula Ve laundered or gry-cleaned.
Respiratory protection:
ciroorni3 coneentra:tons srtoutO pe kept to lowest levels possible. if
vapo•, mi5- or dust is generated ano trio occupational exposure limit of thm
A^oou.t, cr any component of Ina product. i$ exeeedetl, use Appropriate
NIpSti cr Ai5H4 approved aIr'purify'ing or air tsuppIigo respirator after
oete-r•.in+nj� tna airborne concentration of She contaminant_ Air supplies
resolrator8 snoula aluay9 op worn when airborne concentration of the
con;BR.inBnt or oxygen Pohlent is unknown,
ventilation:
Ageo.4ple Ta moat Component occupational exposure limits (see Section 2).
Expo2urQ Limit for Total Product:
None astraoliSheo for prgduct: refer to Section 2 for component
exposure 11m+t5.
S. PHVS(CAL ANO CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
appearance
Da,, rap 1i0� C
Odor:
nour
Roiling point Ibegree5 F1:
Nct ae,erminea
Melting'iree:ing point raegrees F):
NLI 4P011CAC1b.
Specific Gravity ivaterall:
,a0:7
pH of undiluteo product:
NO; apalicaPle
Vapor Pra5awre:
N�•, oeterminau
Viscosity!
9 1 CS: at 13G.0 C
VOC Content:
ryc: gRT�rff�n@a.
_ PAGe: 4
+ G - N37 GE7EFMiNEP N.A. - NOT APPLICABLE N.T. - NOT TESTEO
LJ S5 TtiAN > - GREATER THAN

Jul-08-2002 02:16pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 8187163874 T-848 P.008/012 F-070
ndbu CO E: 01693 Pole Usued: 13-GB-85 �I
NAME; TRH 0I1- SwperSe0s: 07-31-OB
9, M 51GAC AND F ENIGAL PROPERTIES CONT)
Vapor Density (air=l):
Not oetermined.
5olwoiliTy in Water (96):
Not oetermineo,
Other: None
10. STADILI ANDIM—AFFMTY
Thtn Material Gaeta violently MR:
(If others IS checked bel0W, see comments for Details)
Air Water Haat Strong Oxidizers Othora None of These
X
Co4iients ; -
under extreme temparbtures or extended atprapa periods, nydroQun sulfide
IH2S1 Ras MAf' accumu1810 ih the hOad•apaoe Of container.
Products evolved When SuojeCted to Neat or, Cofmstion:
7c4ic levels of Carbon mpnoniaa, car0on OiQxicta, irritating aldehydes And
ketones. ana eomowstion products or cpltlpounds of
;,inc, phosphorus. sulfur Imay include nydropen sulf(de).
Hazardous Polymerizations; 00 NOT OCWR
11, TQXICOLOG CAL INFORMATION
TOXICOLOGICAL ORMATIONt L TQX CI Y DATA)
Median Lethal Dose
Oral:
-D5D Eel ieveo T; oe > 5.00'51A 9 (rat) practically non -toxic
Inhalation:
Not oatermined,
Oermal:
6Z50 beliOVOP IQ De > 2,00 9/kg iraatiitl practically non -toxic
Irritatign Index, Estimation of 2rritition tspaaies)
Skin:
IDraizei 6vliiavad to oe > .50 - 3.00 /8.0 (rabbit) slightly irritating
eyes:
10^ai=el fiviievea to be < 15.Q0 /110 (rabbit) na appreClablo affect
3ensitixation;
No- opterminec,
Other:
Sams lo, vi$goS;T naontne-llc oils have caused 61kin irritation and skin
_mv^5 it lacgra6ory animals when repeatedly applied and left in place
Ce:reen apoligz:lons, The significance of this effect to humans ngs not
oee^ es'aelilsneq
iZ DISPOSAL CONSIRERATIONS
►taste Disposal Mothods
Tn,e proawci has been evaluates for RCRA Characteristics And does not meet
the wri-eria of b hazaraaus waste if disearged in its purch4aeo form,
6;-qe, R�n4, it 15 trip respong10111ty Of tnp user of the product~ to deter-
mine at the time of disposal, uhother the proowc% roaetm RCRA criteria for
n4-aroow5 Waste. Tnis is oecause product uses, transformations, mixtures,
p-ccesses. etc, may renger the rEfrulting malerloto hazardous.
Remarks
hang
13. TRANSPORT INFOR AN
Transportation
DOT:
Proper Snipping Name:
NCI
PACE; 5
h - ha- Ri--ERMINED N.A, - NUT APPLICABLr N.T. - NOT TESTED
- LESS THAN > - GREATER 7MAN

Jul-08-2002 02:16pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P.008/012 F-070
r1LublNb ) 6'1j1JV 010vi • r-'- --- pate 18iiied: 19-08-86 .�•
NAME: TDH OIL supersoft$: 01-31-65
in. TRMSPORf N ORMATIQN CANT)
i I MOG :
Proper Shipping Name:
Not evaluated
ICAO:
proper Snippimg Name:
Not oveluet®C
TUC:
Proper Shipping Name;
Not evaluated
14, REELATORV INFORMATION
Federal Reyu10t1ones:
SARA T W e I I I:
Section 3OR/304 Extremely Hazardous Substances
Sees. C►�emtCal Name CAS NumbFIF Range in
None
Section 302/304 Extremely Hazardous liubstancrs (CONT)
LToo Ro
Nona
Section 311 Hazardous catesorization:
Acute Chronic Fire Pressure Raamtive N/A
X
Section 413 Toxic Chemical
Cnem+cel Name CAS Nur�trer ComeentraTion
Zinc a1h>1 a�tniopn�spnate tiatiAa^s2�3 i.OQ-Z.88
CERC�.A 1021al/00T Hazardous SWONt4noes: (t IngiCates DOT Hazardous Substance)
S�eG. CheMiCbl Narne _ CAS NuMber go-neiA- in f,
hone
CERCLA/RRT Hazardous Sumulaneos (Sequence Ntimders and RQ'$):
LC Ro
None
TSCA inventory Status;
Tnl,K proowcl, or its camponent5, are listed an or are exempt from the
Taws c Suostance Control AcT (T5CA) Chemical Suoslance Inventory.
Other:
N�nB.
Slate Regulations,
California Proposltion 65;
;hE `„'lowino aeteG;avl a comporent$ of this product are 5ub6tanCos,
or peionp to classet of substances, knownto the State of California
tP ca"oe 4anc,er anolor reprvavctive loxieity•
Cnem i ca 1 Narne CAS NurtIQQr
None
States Right -to -know Regulations:
Cnpnical Namb State Ric lit-_tQ-knpw---
YrnC alkyl 011ni0pnoePMOTO CT,I� L� ,LA.N►1.M1
Solvent Oeuaxed light oaraffinie petroleum MA
dlstille>;e5
-. - - ''
(Connecticut) FL(Florida),IL �taie listCT(Illinois), MI (Michigan)
LA Il-oulsiana). MA (Ma$5pc►lusetta). NJ (New Jelraey),
PA (Pennoylvopnie), R1 (RhodO IS1anO)
International Regulations:
MHMIS C1a5s1fication:
NoT regulateo
' Canada Inventory Status:
Not determined.
PAGE: 6
N.D. NOT RETF4101NE; N.A. - NOT APPf`ICASLF N.T. NOT TESTED
< - LESS THAN > - GREATER THAN

Jul-06-2002 02:16pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P 0101012 F-070
PIKUW 61 LQUL: Uts" OAce -To- stied: 12-00-015 UT
NAME: TDN OIL S�rsedas: 07-31-105
la. —INGLAYORY INFO A ION CO
EINECS Inventory Status:
NOT dewrminea,
Australia Inventory Status:
NCe 0e1,erm1n0Q[-
.japan Inventory Status:
Nat oeiernineq_
15. ENYIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
Aquatic Toxic ty:
Not asTorminea.
Mobility:
No- determined..
P,trsiAtence and Biodegradability;
NOt aetermined.
Potential to picaccumulate.
N,jl evaluates.
Remarks:
Ira: evalNaTpa,
16. OTHER IN ORMAYION
tier®
7H5 :NFQRMA-ION CONTAINED HEREIN IS BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE. IT IS PROVIDED
INDO;ENOEN%) OF ANl SALE OF THE PRODUCT FOR PURPOSE DR HAZARD COMMUNICATION
AS PaRT OF TEXACO'S PRODUCT SAFETY PROGRAM. IT 15 NOT INTENOEP YO CONS71TUTF
PSRFQRMANCE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PRODUCT. NO EXPRESS WARRANTY, OR
IM°LIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTA5ILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE IS
µAD;, r'ITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCT OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, DATA
SHEETS ARE AVAILAEiLE FOR ALL TEXACO PRODUCTS. YOU ARE URGED TO OBTAIN DATA
SHE:E-S FOC ALL TEXACO PRODUCTS YOU BUY, PROCESS, USE OR PISYRIBUTE AND YOU
ACE ENCOURAGZD AND REQUESTED TO AOVISt THOSE WHO MAY COME IN CONTACT WITH
PRODUCT$ OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN,
7C GE-ERMIN; APP41CAF-ILITY QR EFFECT OF ANY LAM OR REGULATION YITM RESPECT TO
HE %ROOJ.', 4,15ER SriDULD CDNSUI-T HIS LEGAL, ADVISOR OR THE APPROPRIATE
3:vE;NMEN A::EN-t, TExACD DOES NOT UNDERTAKE TO FURNISH ADVICE ON SUCH
Since the lest mailing for this CUStomer co0e, the fallowing SCCtions
have been revised
;8:8 1:-06-2 Now X Revised. SuperVQdQV: 07-3 -95
0a;e a■+nteo. 12.20.95
.naijr1es regaroing MSD5 should 00 direciod TO;
-a%aCC Int.
mao1ager, Praawci Saf®ty
: Fc. 50$
�ea:an, N1), 12508
PLEA5E SEE NEXT PASS FOR PRODUCT L.ABE4
PAQE: 7 _
K.G NC- P1'"iRM:NED N.A. NOT APPLICAIILE N.T. - NOT TESTED
LESS TnAN > - GREATER THAN

Jul-08-2002 02,17pm From —NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 7448 P 011/012 F-070
FMWWuv l %PYMC : w +oaa .. .. ...... bite 166" : 13-04-66
NAME: TOH OIL Supwrioaes: 07-31-95 `!"
T . PRODUCT LABEL Label Qatb: 13708-65
READ AND UNDERSTAND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET BEFORE HANDLING OR DISPOSING
OF PRODUCT, THIS LABEL COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OSHA HAZARD
COMMUNICATION STANDARD (20 CFR 1910-1200) FOR USE IN THE WORKPLACE, THIS
LARE: 15 NQ7 INTENDED TO HE USED WITH PACKAGING INTENDED FOR SALE TO CONSUMERS
AND MAY NOT CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CON5UMER PRODUCT SAFETY ACT
OR OTHER RELATED REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.
01893 TDH OIL
M
NONE CONSIDERED NECESSARY
eRfeALIT;gNAlyEAS RE
-AVOi6 prolongao preathing of vapor• mist, or 04z.
-Wprkera should Mash exposed skin Several tillmes daily With
soap and water,
F.IA6T Ax0
Eye Cpntact:
F1uSh eyB5 with plenty of water for moveral minutc;. Get medical
attention if eye irritation persists.
Skin Contoot:
Mash skin with plenty of soap ana water for several minutes. Get medical
attention if Skin irritation develops or per9irtf.
Ingestion:
If more than several mouthfuls of this material are swallowed, give -two
91d®5v5 of water (16 02,1. Gat mealcal attention.
Ihhal�t{on:
If Irritation, headache. nau5ov or drow5,ne2z Occurs, remove to fresh air.
Get mvo+cal attention if trearh+np OeeomeS Oiffiewlt or respiratory
irritation perAist5.
Note to Physician:
h1Q� pressure In)ectien of material can eawue severe injury, Failure to
optripe :he wound of all rasiaual material can result in disfigurement,,
)css of fvnct+on, or may require smputattpn of the affected area.
In case oo fira, use water Spray, cry chemical, foam or c4r0gn dioxide,
water may cause frothing, uom water spray to cool fire -exposed Containers.
G hem i ca 1 Name -
CAB NNraber
)tange In Y.
• Severely solvent refineo, 5elvent-dewaxeo
e4749-65-C
35.00-49.89
neavy paraffinic petroleum ojstillata5
• Sclvent oRwaxerl lignt par4ffinic petroleum
64742-56-8
35,00-43.99
d+5:+lla:n>t
• nyoro;reateo hebvy- paraffinic petroleum
64742-54-.7
3.00-8.09
oI_;+11ate8
Aao,:lves
1,00-2.99
Z'mc alk11 plth+opho5phate
68649.42-3
1.OQ-2.99
. �pa:en :ignt napntnenie p®troleum
64742-53-6
1,00-2,99
a;s;Ilia;q;.
Metnacryl,C acid, copolymer of "bytyl^,
50867.55-5
1,00-2 99
"lauryl^ and 15Teary I"ester$ M1th
3-dimeIMy) -am inppropyImethacryldmldo
PRODUCT I5 NON-HAZARODUS ACCORDING TO OSMA (1910.1200).
COMPONENT IS HAZARDOUS ACCORDING TO OSHA.
;OMPONENT, Bi DEFINITION, IS CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS
ACCORDING TO
OSHA
FECA05F I; CARRIES THE PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMIT
(PEL) FOR MINERAL 01U
MIST.
Aa^nnelIv n,nip Special Hazardous&ubstancd(f,l
CA5 Number
Rands in X
NpnO
HMIS
NFPA
meal:': I Reactivity! 0 Mealth;
1 Reactivity: o
F I ammao i I I I).: i special - Fiammatzility: 1 5pecial -
Transportation
OCT:
Proper Shipping Name:
Not re0V1dt90
PAGE: a
r,D, - NCT DETERMINED N.A. - NOT APPLIFAHLE
N,T. - NOT TESTED
. LESS ?WAN > - GREAYCR TH4N

Jul-08-2002 02:17pm From —NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-848 P.0121012 F-070
nI%uuu61 vuuG; W1904 Pai• 15lu e! 19-OB--65 �.
NAME: TOM OIL SNpfl`iQdo$1 Oy-9185
17. PRPDUCT LABEL (CONT) M61 Date: 12.08.95
CAUTION: MiBUSe of empty ConTainers Can be ha4prdou5, Empty COnSalnpru can
be hazardous 1f U560 %0 Store toxic, f1OR1114101e, or rear -live
ma%Crialg, Cu111nq or Melding of empty Container$ miOhT Cayse
fire. 6X010810n„0r tpxiC.fum®s from residues. Do not,pras6yrizR
or expose To Open Flame or lieac. Keep container C1056d And drum
pungs in plate.
ManwfacTurvr,S Name and Address:
TFXACD LUBRICANTS COMPANY
A DIVISION OF TEXACp REFINING AND MARKETING INC.
P.O, Box 4427
Houston. TX 77210.4427
TRANSPORTATION EMERGENCY Company: [phone]
CHEMYPFC: (800) 124-93CK1
HFp T EMERGENCY Company; (S14) 831-34M

1
State of North Carolina
Department of. Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Waste Management. Systems
Request for Certificate of Coverage
Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring NPDES General Permit
! On July 1, 2012, the.Noitli Carolina NPDES General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will expire, Facilities that have
been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these NPDES General Permits must apply for renewal within 30 days of receipt
of this application.
Please do not leave any question unans",ered Please make any necessary corrections to the data below•
1: Facility Number: / and Certificate of Coverage Number:��
2. Facility Name: 1L1 • f.� %Z�SOr / pig )
1 f
3. Landowner's name (same as on the Waste Management Plan):. 0"V
4. Landowner's mailing address'. !}
City/State: +/ /C e-1&!j /'L..CQQ _
Telephone Number (include area code):olJ
5. Facility's physical address:O
City/State:, / .' Ile /, ,
6. County where facility is locatbd: .711 /• l"/fx
7. Farm Manager's name (If different than the Landowner):
E-mail:
Zip:
8. Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code): �. -' '0& "F J �7
9: Integrator's name (if there -is not an integrator write "None"): 'yd
10. Lessee's name (if there is not a lessee write "None"): _%'✓D/�
11. Indicate animal operation type and number:
zip: 7�1�%
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer. Laying Chickens
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Turkeys _ -
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Other
Farrow'to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Pullets
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder Turkey Poults
Boar/Stud Beef Brood Cow
Gilts Other
Other
- Wet Poultry
f-Turss:.c - I-Torses Sheep Sheep - - ---_.__ Non J:aying Pullets
FORM RENEWAL-NPDES-1.2/2011
• �� �E�nR 1 p�C��e
(� I

Submit two (2) copies of the most recent Certified Animal Waste Manat emeut Plan (CAWMP). The CAWMP must include
the following components: Some of these components may not have been required'at.thetime the facility was certified: but
should be added to.the CAWMP for permitting purposes:
• The Waste Utilization Plan .(WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the
facility
The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
• A map of every field .used .for land application
• The soil series present on every land application field
• The crops grown on every land application field
• The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
• The PAN to be applied to every land application field � F S 1 4 2012
• Phosphorous to be applied on every land application field with a "HIGH" PLAT rating,
• The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
e The required NRCS Standard specifications hC D�NR
• A site schematic
Bale{^h�F'°{r'nal Mice
s Emergency Action Plan
• Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
• Odor Control Checklist with.chosen best management practices noted
• Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. Amass mortality plan must also be included.
• Site -Specific Conservation Practices. necessary to prevent runoff of.pollutants to waters of the State.
• PLAT results including datasheets for each field.
• Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.); please be sure to include any site evaluations,
wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your. facility
+ Operation and Maintenance Plan
I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of. my.knowledge: I'understand that, if
all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting: information and attachments are not included,
this .application package will be returned to me as incomplete. • Note: In accordance with NCGeneral Statutes 14372.15,6A. and 143-
215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to
civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation...(18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment bya fine of not more than :$10,000 or
imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both fora similar. offense.)
Printed Name of Signing. Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If'Landowner is a corporation,
signature should be by a principal executive Officer of the corporation):
Name:..
Si;gnature:. ` r ��
Name:
i
1(a�uTitle: Yowl
Tate:
Title:'
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED, APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27690463.6 r
Telephone Number: [phone]
F -w, Nu„ lwr: (019) 807-6.354
FORM RENEWAL-NPDES-1212011

Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
ANIMAL WASTE, UTILIZATION PLAN
CALEDONIA PRISON
P.O. BOX 137
TILLERY NC 27887
252-826-5621
Existing poultry Laying
60000 head
0 E
c EB 1 A. 2012
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic P!CD`rNR
>;I'l nine .
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The.plant nutrients in the animal waste should be.`used-,
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the .crops_;
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your -waste -utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste:, and,:to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally`,safe.manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be,:�.
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply.:'-.
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize
2. Soil types are important as they have different
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities,"and .
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied;to land eroding at less -than
5 tons per acre per. year. Waste may be applied to land'.....,:' ..<..
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE XTILIZATION.PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and,
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing.,crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on :
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to'be flexible... `
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type:,:
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum -:range for specific - ":'.��.:..` ..
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements,
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.),
60000
head x tons waste/head/year = tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
60000 head x 'Og41bs PAN/head/year = 5039.4 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of.waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner..
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
*,LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW-.N-_;,.,.
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
--=----.
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC-
METH
N
TIME:
4485':-
3304
86
StB
FP
3.0
150
0
29.9
I
SEPT.-MAY
3304
181
lStB
3304
F 81
jStB
3304
160
jStB
3304
-60
jStB
3304
-60
jStll
3304
�60
jStB
3304
28
jStB
3304
-28
jStB
3304
-28
jStB
3304
-28
lStB
END
BH
0
114664 � '�,.':
IAPR-.SEPT
16.3
1315
136.4�,
SG
0
36.4-
1794'....52::.
I
129..
149.3
NOV-APR"
SB
4 0
0
14.. 0..
560.:;'. `...
140
1
CO
900
-
0
0 ,
I
1108
114. 1,1512_:.:::
APR-AUG-
C
120
0
14:.0:.,
2100.;
I
1150
MAR'JUN
SG.
49.3
0
690.`2­'_;
II
129
11.4.0:
NOV -APR:
SB
40
40
0
4.8
192- '.:.=:
I
JUN-AUG
CO
900
0
518: 4
1108
14.8.,,�,,
APR-AUG
C
0
8
I
1120
1150
14. 1720.,
MAR-JUN.
SG
0
236.64
I
129
14-9.3
14.8.
NOV-APR
I
TOTAL
Page: 3

' ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied.
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations.may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
NOTE: SOME FIELDS ARE SHOWN WITH A (ti) AND. THESE FIELDS ARE PART OF
THE NORMAL CROPPING ROTATION. THESE FIELDS'MAY BEPLANTEDWITH -:.
ANY ONE OF THESE CROPS, AND THE NUTIENT UPTAKE WILL HAVE TO,.BE
ACCOUNTED FOR THAT PARTICULAR 'MOP.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.

** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables.l and 2 above:.
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
50
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
CO
COTTON
POUNDS
0.12
FP
TALL FESCUE -GRAZED
TONS
.50.
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
1.0:
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TABLE 1
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
85.1
' LBS AW N

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total.
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will'be, more than the .
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding,.occurs. Thi`sY;.`.'
rate is limited by.initial soil moisture content, soil structure, --soh,`;;'``_
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application°amount-_.`
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of:the�.soil atthe
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land.application for:this.plan,lF��
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer::to'ensure.;:_
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate- the .acres:
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the: recommended rates ':and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the.tabl:es may make this plan invalid.'...-... -
The Y�
following table is provided as a guide :for establishing application,:.,-,
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount:.:
(inches)
3304
28
StB
SB
0.5
*1.0
3304
60
StB.
SB
0.5
*1.0
3304
81
StB
BH
0.5
*1.0
3304
86
StB
FP
0.5
*1.0
3304
"28
StB
C
0.5
*1.0
3304
728
StB
CO
0.5
*1.0

3304
-28
3304
-60
3304
"60
3304
60
3304
'81
StB
StB
StB
StB
StB
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SG
0.50
C
0.5
CO
0.5
SG
0.50
SG
0.5
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00'
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste.Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that.is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to. planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.-
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for.waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry.
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five ( 5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Dn--. 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:CALEDONIA PRISON
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CALEDON A PRISON
(Please print)`
Signature: r Date:
Name of Manager(If different Prom owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)John Y Clark
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-583-3481
Address (Agency): Post Office Box 8
Halifax NC 27839-0008
Signature: Date: I B
D-,--. 1 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Term of Agreement:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
, 19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division,of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.

tv
NO`
-411
L.0
fi ivsj
4 AWJL
f4
Air
tar
gw. ..... .
tA

• •: - `°ram '.H�/'► I . V. \ Vi ...� `. (�
.F r Ipoo v 1 4-
i . 1 ''ti to N j
Y..
51
."• y .k 1�a7" = .�1 �.. �k�'ly� I ( r' +1` ,.�
•� Ir
_IF' c5T .M_ JN' .C•� I"d�'�.':i r (� f i ui.{/' iIt
t ,�•.i :
it
.Q ° �"�yii •.� to �� �. ti rrC`•,,.
I r--j
• ':1 v \ . . ' ` • � • �i�•er,"`` . %b' � � V d'' � � � ti e"r^ �'�`r� "%cam'.;
Lag
7: I S� d : i'3•+0`4!iW z+� '� ..�nl• i`•�f7i1"t'G 2 a a„ ,% r }• ,•fit' { _ r,�x�'.t
k'`ex
^]rq
��`\ n�•5:' `^7 �'7 +. •^,�,'irt'}:i...a.,
r a ..
'! : I �` "� � � \ � ,.� \ 1 � �.: It7 ",�''r� � y`la•�a f rt.. `�e'`��• L ryw
. -.+ i..' • \ � ir'+ .\\ I`''. ir+� �bS I�'•,!t� n.'.�C r.(�•�i �?7':.
y:_ ', . +►: is
w "1C�q � f L y i �. t L.t cYa.• � J ,
` '1 i.�I�CT i� _ •yd .Ir � M '+ty7/�w�{. . ,M 4.�:� � t..
i 1� ` �, ,`i1., �; �'.;�', : •,:ten, 7f. .. 'y, �;t!r.R.a
Zip
x'''_'�
-� 1. � \`'��., . Cy _ �•: � ��. ,;�+. . `
04
Ex ?a sLLre
Fkrii n.s

VwXV3
it
Il
� Fl.
tle.
JT
tz
. . . . . . . . . .
ij
iA

:u : '�� :'.r�..Y '. w'..N. �iK •••f ..'•{,,i� r„��'ir: ^ I r-��-' ' :I� ,��„• r: .p.,
iI'
.R -1 I •L. ! f ,:. � .' • 1 Xy tt 11"'..may '":'�,• ��
7, Www "
`�'S'tk Y r h
�. .._.... ..•T. - rJiE. �'" _"tir��,c, �qr. - �!I_}+'. tw ' - - t r.. '� d.": ''I ,�c:'I�i� 7E��.
• J .%�� yFu 4i !1 '' ,��'•�'.i1 +t".:L vrr'`}�.f Y .'; •. � k ,• ! .r i
y1•>j�r��� ��1r Y, •,1 A. \'`•QV � � .` I� r , ba ,`` to r: � ` �:1.�t`i•p� .
3 .•��„a'n.{7 w.i.. / ��q•r Fit.
.i , ':"' � � f A •s,:} , it < � a . �� h �k z, r 't. 11' Y � '
.P'4 U •'rrti 1fiJ� ..: • _-. - 1,� � 'r,17`L�� n"'l7 r � •"'•r.•.-.,. •� :...r,� � �
"w Ae {51
t, `Y_ •v+.1,+.. ..•__:..:.-.tea.-.�+� ,'•'i 1Y.n ; . ,, ru '' �•�'r'f• .. r !�,:
Nn
�' � r 1 a.�,�T1.: to 'e*'TcYi i� c'�'p� r r;+,(•'0JJr w�,f/� , 7`f � � '} -�c �5 ��rp � .
:?2�'�`i."•Cr earn• c
r.
r�
Jam..,• % � lY ' a
A \•
:AL J.••

• w:�.�:,:r. .. ,•�;:, •:f.},Tj^T.;v: f7�,j !::'{r;;.. -+a••i•a� ,y+',T t,.a•; a .►•;
,ij':S. ���: :)" ,;4+:y :4:'4. •'f; :�a`y; �: i.�6 S' •'t`+'.::fi? "i;/,
'e. 1 , i 2♦ ,.,.; ;:. ..., `'r ✓jr+5• 'ire ;:•.. t `: .�+"••: ��yy 1� � .�[
. ,yF: rvj; ' �.. I �i•' ,;: . C-��:� > � rJ�r•' -. f' � 'i. ,y,. r. i1,t•. �" ! ,.
1. • r I , t i. '.. J ,' .. w. ...
. ►. ry +

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
-- luurrc- Cause RMI's to Control Insects Site Sliccific Pracliccs
Systems
FIus1J (11111crs Accunntlation of solids Pr Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
glitters as designed.
Q Remove bridging of accumulatcd solids at
I.al;nwJs and NIS • Cruslcd Solids - Maintain lagoons, scllling basins and pits where - - - -
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
cnlsting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
I:accs:'iVe Vcl;ctrlivc Decuying vegelalinn Maintain vegetative control along banks of
t in��t Jh lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accuuntlatinll ofdecaying vegetative mailer
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
_ Dry Systems
Fcu) Spill.,gc Pr Design, operate and uaintain feed systems
bunkers and Ironbhs) to minimize the
j"cllulllalioll of decaying wastage.
W Clean tip spillage on u routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 1 S-30 day interval
_ during winter).
I ccd S,orage Accumulations of feed residues Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around inunedi:nc perimeter of 1ecd slorage
urcus by insuring drainage nway from she
an(Vnr providing adequrlc containment
covered bin for brewers groin and similar high
loisture grain products).
O Inspect for and rentove or break up -accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage.
ncedcd.
Wit

$uurrc CaUSe
Ani►nal I lolling Areas Accumulations of animal wastes CI
and feed wastage
n
NY h1allme handling Accumulations ofanimal wastes n
Systems
n
a
IIMPs to Conlrol lusects. Site Specific Practices
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by anin►als is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and fiIlcr strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 '
clay interval during summer. I5-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in litter strips around stnckpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For 111ore intone:lion contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomoingy, pox 7613, North Carolina State University.
Raleigh. NC. 37695-7613.
AAllt: :nilrcr 11. 1996. Page 2

--S irrhFarm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
tiourcc Cause IIMPs to il9iuiulize Odor Site specific Practices
I ;u uute;..l Swine production 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers;
n Recommended best management practices;
n Gond judgment and common sense
Animal body surface Dirty manure -covered animals n pry floors
I Iur ;ui frees Wct manure-covcrctl flours n Slotted floors;
n Waterers located over slotted floors;
Cl Feeders at high end of solid floors;
n Scrape manure buildup from floors;
n Underfloor ventilation for drying
hl.nuuc collection I)ils • (trine; n frequent manure removal by flush, pil recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposilion or scrape;
n Underfloor ventilation
VCn111.161111 c\liatlsl Ears Volatile gases; n- Pan maintenance; .
nest n Efftciew air movement
Induur surfaccs
Dust
n
Waslldown between groups of animals;
fl
Feed :iddilives;
n
heeder covers;
n
Peed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
I:lusli t.wl.s
0 Agitation of recycled lagoon
Cl
.Plush lank covers-,
liquid while links arc lining
n
13xtend fill lines to near bouoo, or was %vitb
anti -siphon vents
I lush alleys
0 Agitation during wastewater
n
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
I'll iecb.nl;e points
0 Agitation of recycled lagoon
n
Extend recharge lines to near bollmo ufpils
liquid while Ails are filling
with anti -siphon vents
I:III sl;1liolls
Agitation during sump lank
n
Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown
outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater n iiox covers
ur junction boxes conveyance
AAII II' - 1•11 1ve11tber 11. 1996, 11agt:

Source _ Cause — BMPs to Minimize Odor — -- - - - Sile Specific Practices
1:1111 of drainpipes .11 0 Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces 0 Volatile gas emissions; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Cv"Correct lagoon startup procedures;
Agitation rt" inimum surface area-to-vohtme ratio;
Cl Minimum agitation when.pumping;
Q Mechanical aeration;
fl Proven biological additives
Ilrigalion sprinkler
0 I llgh pressure agitation;
f-Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
naulcs
• Wind drift
_"Minimum recommended operating pressure;
f_e/Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
( Pump from second -stage lagoon
51111:1t!C lalll. of basin
• Partial microbial decomposition;
n
Bottom or midlevel loading;
Mixing while filling;
n
'Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying
Q
Basin surface mats of solids;
CI
Proven biological additives or oxidants
ScIlling bas111 sltft;lce
• Partial microbial decomposition;
CI
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath llllllid
• Mixing while fining;
level;
• Agitmion when emptying
Cl
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
e Agitation when spreading;
Ll
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader Outlets
. Volatile gas emissions
Q
Wash residual nianure from spreader after use;
CI
Proven biological additives or oxidatus
Uncovered m;uulic.
a Volatile: gas emissions while
L7
Soil injection ofshirry/slndbes
slurry or shldge on field
drying
0
Soil incorporation within 48 brs.;
sur laces
C_7
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
CI
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
• Carcass decomposition
_
Proper disposition of carcasses
Ih:ul;ulinl:el disposal 0 Carcass decomposition CI Complete covering of -carcasses in lluri;il pits;
I111i 0 T 00location/cmislructinn ofllispo�al pits
luiinel:ewu
• Incomplete colldlus6oll
' Secondary stack,hurners
Antr wemher 11, 1996. Page 4

Source cause / 11MI's to Minimize Odor- Site Specific Practices
Standing %vater arollltd • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
laclltttes . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Al.mnre hack-ed unto • Poorly maintained access roads I-arnt access road maintenance
pulllic roads Lion► faro►
access
L
Additional Information :
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 ItulelRMP Packet
Swine Production Dann Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; G13AG Fact Sheet
Swine Production facility Manure Management: Pit Recilarge - Lagoon Treatment ; GQAG 129-88
Swinc Production Facility Manurc Management: Underfloor flush - Lagoon Treatment ; CRAG 129-88
Lagoon Design and Management for livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; G13AG 103-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; GDAG fact Sheet
Controlling Odors from Swine Imildings; Pill-33
Foviroomenlal Assurance Program ; NI'1'C Manual
Options Illr Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task force
Noisance C'oncents in Animal Manure Management: Odors and flies PROW. 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCS11. Camnty Extension Center
NCSI1 - IIAE
NCS11 - IIAI'
NCSI1 - IIAE
NCSI I - IIAI:
NCSI1- IIAI:
NMI - Swine Extension
NC fork Producers Assoc
NCSU Agri Cummunicatinns
Florida Cooperative Extension
AAI( W 11. 1996- P-ll;e 5

EA.-IER GEN CY ACTION PLAN
PH Q NT, NUN LBERS
DWQ Giaj�j—zo3/
EMERGENCY M.-:VAGEvLE.N7 SYSTELM (2if)
SWCD
MRCS (9v).583'3F81
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen: This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
zz
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor. -
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close %-aIves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks poor to resmain; pumps.
D: LeakaQe from Flush systems. houses. $olid separator_ -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irri_•ation pump.
c. Mzj.ke sure no siphon occurs.
J. Stop .:11 in the house. tiu:h >� ate ;. Or _cliJ �r±parators.

6: Contact the technical specialist who cerified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
.a. ,Name: (/J D," IJR( S
b. Phone: r9i9 ) - S-r3 — 3 V
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectif%-' the damage. repair the s%,stem, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
.

• Y•
Mortality Management Methods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
:.l Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public bodv of water.
=� Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
In [he case of dead poultry only, piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of A--rtculture
J Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the .State Veterinarian must be
attached)

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average
«, operating conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge
rates and application rates change over time as equipment gets older
and components wear. In particular, pump wear tends to reduce
operating pressure and flow. With continued use, nozzle wear results
in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application rate, diameter of
coverage, and subsequently the application uniformity. For example,
operating the system with excessive pressure results in smaller
droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase.
Plugged intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating
pressure. Operating below design pressure greatly reduces the
coverage diameter and application uniformity.
For the above reasons, you should calibrate your equipment on a
regular basis to ensure proper application rates and uniformity.
Calibration at least once every thr s recommended.
Calibration involves fo e%ting and measuring flow at several
locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be
used to collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain
gauges work best because they already have a graduated scale from
which to read the application amount without having to perform
additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets, jars, or
anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used
provided the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled
container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located
randomly throughout the application area at several distances from
sprinklers. For traveling guns, sprinklers should be located along a
transect perpeadicular to the direction of pull. Set out collection
container 25 feet 7a art long the transect on both sides of the gun
cart. You s ould compute the average application rate for all
collection containers. You should also look for evidence of
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation
between containers of more than 30 percent is cause for concern.
You should contact your irrigation dealer or technical specialist
for assistance.

k4or
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter.annuals follow summer annuals.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may-.
require farmers in some parts of'North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. 'This plan-`'
only addresses nitrogen.
SOME FIELDS ARE SHOWN WITH A (ti) AND THESE FIELDS ARE PART..OF
THE NORMAL CROPPING ROTATION. THESE FIELDS MAY BE PLANTED WITH
ANY ONE OF THESE CROPS, AND THE NUTIENT UPTAKE WILL HAVE TO BE
ACCOUNTED FOR THAT PARTICULAR CROP.
.•.�(l C'� r"n1 �!i✓i n t�o�U U��f' !�/ / �� . �Q.� dc'�C� :. /5 : 2� vti �J -' �i

State of North ,Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
dw
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 1, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Department of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
P.O. Box 67.
Tillery, NC 27887
Attn:Mr. David Inscoe
Subject: Notice of Violation
Caledonia Prison Farm
COC No. AWP420001
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Inscoe:
On September 28, 2001, Mr. J.D. Hester from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the
Division's efforts to determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
There was no active discharge of wastewater into waters of the State from your lagoon.
The lagoon had the required amount of freeboard at the time of the inspection. However,
the inspection revealed several deficiencies that should.be immediately addressed:
At the time of the inspection several muskrat holes were observed in the secondary
lagoon. It is highly recommended that this facility fills these areas and inspects this
structure for any'additional holes. You are encouraged to contact the Halifax County Soil
and Water Conservation District for any technical assistance you may require in this
matter.
As a permitted animal facility, you are required to have a copy of your freeboard
monitoring records, readily available for inspection to determine compliance with
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Caledonia Prison Farms
NOV
Page-2-
conditions in your general permit. During the inspection no freeboard records were
available. The above mentioned conditions are violations of your current Animal Waste
General Permit AWP420001, Section III. Line 2 "Monitoring and Reporting
Requirements", Your permit also requires that the lagoon levels be recorded weekly on
forms supplied or approved by Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Please respond to the
Notice in writine within 30 days after the receipt of this Notice. You should specifically
discuss what steps have been taken to correct these deficiencies. This office appreciates
your cooperation in this matter. If you have any further questions regarding this
inspection, please call JD Hester at [phone] Ext. 335.
La
Siincerely,
uster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe/ DSWC-RRO
RRO Files

STATE a
ry
W
North Carolina Department of Correction
Enterprise Farms
Michael F. Easley PO Box 67 • Caledonia Drive • Tillery, NC 27887
Governor
October 12, 2001
NCDENR
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster:
. 4
.,._
i.,..�
T
S
O
—'
a
LLJJ
Upon receiving the Notice of Violation on October 11, 2001, the following corrective
action has been implemented. An inspection of the lagoon and the area surrounding it
will be completed on a daily schedule. Any areas that are found that are in need of filling
will be addressed at the time of inspection. The supervisor will take corrective action as
to trapping the rodents around the lagoon.
We will maintain accurate records in the future as to freeboard and levels of the lagoon.
These records of monitoring will be in accordance with our permit. The forms will be
made readily available and kept in the office for review during your inspection. I have
spoken with the supervisor of this operation concerning these violations and the
corrective measures to be implemented. It is our goal to manage and monitor the lagoons
in accordance with the Division of Water Quality.
Thank you for your assistance in making us aware of these violations. If I may be of any
further assistance, please call.
Sinc ely,
41
ex /zw
Phillip C. Sykes, Manager
Enterprise Farm Operations
CC: Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Hugh Crawley, Poultry Supervisor
File
Beck
tary
Telephone: [phone] An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer Fax: [phone]

v.
d ;,w STATf a
•<� Wnm Nf�-V•
North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises
P. O. Box 29540
`
W
Chapanoke Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Les Martin Franklin Freeman, Secretary
Enterprise Director
Date:
August 25, 1995
To:
Guriiie Lee, PE
Central Engineering
From:
William J. Hassell
Farm Operations Manager
Re:
Corrective Action/Lagoon
Caledonia Farm
In accordance with Mr. Buster Towell and your recommendations
for the appropriate corrective action for the Enterprise layer
operations lagoon.
1. The freeboard on our lagoon was less than 12 inches and to avoid
any breaching during periods of heavy rains, the following
corrective action has been implemented.
Corrective Action Taken- The pump that pulls the water from our
lagoon was moved and placed to allow direct diversion of lagoon
water. As an additional precaution we moved it so in the event of
a pump or hose disconnect, any water loss would drain directly back
into the lagoon. The lagoon level has been pulled down to a 20"-24"
freeboard.
2. The lagoon spraying system was noted to have a damaged hose and
was spraying too close to a drainage ditch.
Corrective Action Taken- The flexible 4" line has been replaced
with rigid irrigation pipe. The spray nozzles in our intensive
grazing pastures have been relocated to insure that no water will
enter a drainage ditch.
Phone: [phone] Courier # 53-71-00 Fav (914) AAI_.+.tn()

Central Engineering
August 25, 1995
Page 2
3. An animal waste water management plan ( required by December
1997 )
Action Taken - See attached ( Letter to initiate plan )
cc:Les Martin
K.L. Kautzky
W. Stoval
Kenneth Schuster

North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises
P. O. Box 29540
Chapanoke Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Les Martin Franklin Freeman, Secretary
Enterprise Director
Date: August 24, 1995
To: Steve Bennett
Regional Coordinator, Division of
Soil and Water Conservation
From: William J. Hassell
Caledonia Farms
Farm Operations Manager
Enterprise Division
Re: Animal waste management plan
In order that I may comply with all required water quality
regulations and guide lines for implementing an animal waste
management plan, please give me a call or written instruction as to
the procedures that I must follow to ensure that we at Enterprise
are in complete compliance. I realize that the deadline is many
months away, but due to the nature and scope of this required plan,
you and your staff will certainly have many other private and
corporate plans to cover. Thank you for any assistance concerning
this matter.
William J. Hassell
P. 0. Box 67
Tillery, N. C. 27887
Phone: [phone]
cc:Les Martin
K.L. Kautzky
Phone: [phone] Courier # 53-71-00 F;,Y• (919) AA')-eA.04

\L%
y pp
SPECIAL OLYM6A
ryJOfl„D GAPS MS
is WPC
i*`w� c 4��4�i
y- N ,
Gaul �� OF'
North Carolina Department of Correction
PROUD SPONSOR 214 West Jones Street - P.O. Box 29540 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
1 - 8 8 8 - 7 6 7 - 1 9 9 9
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
March 30, 1999
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
NCDENR, Regional Water Quality Supervisor
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Schuster:
q? I
Ii�Co.
'f
V.
Mack
In response to your letter dated March 10, 1999, Notice of Violation at Caledonia Farms, we are
in the process of addressing these concerns. The violation at the fresh produce warehouse has
been turned over to Bill Stovall, Chief of Engineering with NCDOC. The construction of this
facility was under their supervision. I am very confident that Mr. Stovall has made contact with
the engineer who designed this building and will be in contact with you addressing this concern.
This processing facility has not been put in operation. Once this facility is operational the volume
of water utilized will be for washing the product only. The types of vegetables that will be
processed will include cabbage, peppers, cucumbers, tomatoes and lettuce. There will be no
chemicals used on these products as these will be processed for the fresh market. The amount of
process water used at this facility will be approximately one to two hundred gallons per day. The
processing of fresh vegetables ai the produce warehouse will be limited to two or threc hays per
week. I do not anticipate this operation running five days a week.
In reference to the concern of washing the potatoes and the water entering an open ditch, this
process has been discontinued. Eventually, this process will be moved to the produce
warehouse. This process included the use ofBrotran 75W Fungicide as an agent to prevent
postharvest rot. The amount of product used is .75 lb. of active ingredient per 100 gallons of
water. The volume of water used at this site would be approximately two to three hundred
gallons per week. This facility is normally used once a week and this provides enough product to
supply the vegetable warehouse.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

The cleaning of this equipment does not require any type of chemicals or disinfectants. We are
"currently using water as a wash down method. The total consumption of processed water at this
facility will be approximately 800-1200 gallons per day of operation. If we choose to use a
cleaning agent or any type of disinfectants, we will certainly get clearance from your department
before we implement it in our process.
Phillip Sykes, Manager
Caledonia Farms
cc: Jim Godwin
Rodney Gusler

-, State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LT!WA
Health and Natural Resources 'IWA
Raleigh Regional Office JAM
James B. Hunt, ,SecretaE H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 2, 1995
Mr. William N. Stoval
Chief of Engineering
North Carolina Department of Correction
1001 Navaho Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Caledonia Layer Operation
North Carolina Highway 561
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Stoval:
On July 24, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoon has little freeboard, less than 12 inches in some
areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in order
to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breach.
-It was also observed that your hydrant system has a cut hose
and that your sprayer was located in close proximity to a
drainage ditch. In order to pump out your lagoon to
recommended levels the hose should be repaired and the
sprayer should be moved to a point further away from the
ditch.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues within
30 days of receipt of this letter.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Caledonia Layer operation
Management Deficiency Notification
Page 2
You should specifically address how you plan to correct these
problems and submit a schedule (with dates) stating when these
management deficiencies will be corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil'and
Water Conservation

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC Dept. of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
Dear NC Dept. of Corrections:
J&74
• •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
r
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping ` 0�F'
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number�_42-_V
Halifax_County---)
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. 1RR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
SincL
'f 16-e*7-
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

.��
JUL-14-1995 TO
15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION
PRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attennor,
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -7 ` 2- , 1995
Time: / ,-/ / D
2
�,
Farm Name/Owner. '.G��' , '`' ;�` :z �2 �� i_.:•� .
Mailing Address: Iy G 1)ay5l e o , s
County. -
Integrator Phone:
On Site Representative: l Phone:
Physical Address/Location:�
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry _ Cattle
Design Capacity: SD� r->v 'L71 Number of Animals on Site;
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number-: ACNEW
Ladrude:.p 6 % �_" Longitude:^? 7 " 2 6 Yz Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
.Does the Animal Waste. Lagoon have suffic'r. freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
t
(approximate) v 1. Foot + 7 inches) Yes or Actual Freeboard: I — Ft. Inches
Wasany seepage observed from the
Is adequate land available for spray?
Crop(s) being utilized: ee . r�J
�ou(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or;
�or No Is the cover crop adequate? C.Yes r No
,. -S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'?
200 Feet from Dwellings? xes,'or No
100 Feet from Wells?��s, or No
_ e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Zoo
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or No
'; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by tnart-made ditch,. flushing system, or other
iimilar man-made deN ices? Yes oro If Yes, Please Explain.
7)t �cs [tic facility maintain adequate waste mariagemcat records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: L� ti h 2e c1 e rl '�� .h P____T G�w,r� _ ,4-�, �✓ w+ ry�
1� o C
L"�,�/►j' F`1 i lL t�. 1 �1 G-e e- D r J- d , i,"�.
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.F2

-�--• TO
JUL-14-1995 15:2e FROM DEM WATER DUALITY SECTION
RRO P.02ia2
Site Requires Immediate Attennor
Facility No. 2'
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE' VISITATION RECORD
DATE: —7 - 2 ti ' , 1995
Time: I V / -0
Farm Name/Owner.
Mailing Address: _
County -
Integrator.
0 Cc,ye v v dk s
Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
/ O' ' -
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: -sal �C-2a Number of Animals on Site: 3�' � o —� Lr9 y 4,-s
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' % _" Longitude: -1 % " Z L V Z " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes. or No
.Does the Animal Waste. Lagoon have suffic' t freeboard of 1 Foot.+ 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1. Foot + 7 inches) Yes or ,�o Actual Freeboard:. I' '—Ft. Inches
Was. any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes-orto
Is adequate land available for spray?6�Oe r No Is the cover crop adequate? 9"o
Crop(s) being utilized: 6r W n
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from. Dwellings? es No
100 Feet from. Wells?(S� or No
_pie animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Co
'> animal. waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 .Feet of a USGS' Map Blue Line? Yes or Io
's animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-madeditch,. flushing system, or other
;'a_- man-made. devices? Yes ore) If Yes. Please Expl:urt.
far 5 tnc facility maintain adequate waste mattageractit records (volumes of ruanure; land applied
spray irxigated.on specific acreage -with cover crop)'? Yes or No
Additional Comments: Ln Sktns^ h 4ee d (t rl J (y ,Q r4-r, �+^ w► G
I rL C a,w+ C V I K1yGM , fi
y s how- vim- b Z,
t�)�/✓ ► ' t r S � L D .4, J"-
A-) a f,
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
AVs-
A
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.C2

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Dept. of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
Dear NC Dept. of Corrections:
1 • •
00ft rA71
A 9 10 AUN 0 2 0 SON
A4 �"`
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 15, 2000
F",
"11
MAY 19 ?nno 1
Subject: Status Update Wettable Acre
Determination
Animal Waste Management System-- -��.-,
Facility Number 42-1
Halifax County
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is hereby requesting a status update concerning the
completion of a Wettable Acre Determination for your subject facility. A letter dated August 27,
1999 was sent to advise you that your facility was required to complete a Wettable Acre
Determination within six months (see attached letter). As of May 10, 2000 DWQ has not
received the facilities Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form. Please submit to DWQ
within 10 days a written explanation as to why a Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form
has not been submitted. Please include the necessary information detailing the steps taken to
certify this facility for Wettable Acres.
Please be aware that not submitting this certification within the allotted six months may
result in civil penalty assessments, permit revocation, and/or injunctive relief.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County
Ordinance, or permitting requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely, '7�.
Sonya Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

t .
" i t II)i n of Soil, AWater Conservation Compliance Inspection �,;
1 ��� d
wisron,of Water Quality
Comph:�nce Inspection
i
; I
Operation
t
l2ev�ew
t ,:
+. ' t; `..F
0"Other, , .gency:`
i . ;' . �' a
�', t'" a` '' ! � .,
.; ' t
LO'Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
.ems. Date of Inspcclion
Facility Number _-�
Time of Inspection 1 d 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted �Krtirjed E3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
N /ff "� �% I / ..........................
Farm Name: �!!...4. (�! F tr,ly,✓. /�0 ..!..` ..!%1S �'i��QC�rjrl 4' County: ......7"l, !.....��................................................
Owner Name: .%C.....1,.!!..V..'.. C...- ..................... Phone No:.... ....�... tP. �.... 3.:.. l..................................................... ............
Facility Contact: .. ll h(Yi6-.......... Title :....................... ..................... Phone No:............................
.......................
Mailingaddress:.......:.Q........x..6..........�.�.l..(4.....1!'�.G �..... ............................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ... y...av i C r`SC�g-�, Integrator: r
......................................... g...........................................................................
Certified Operator: ....... .(/.!........�....................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: FF
r..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Latitude • �' ��� Longitude � • �' �"
. i Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poult • Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
ayer p1 1[:] Dairy -
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number oftagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spay Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
( 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes 2rlgo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance. man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters []Waters of the State ❑ Yes o
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes 24o
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? '
Structure 1 Structure 2
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No /
❑ Yes
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): v'�Q
.................................
.............................................................................
i
Continued on I
1 /6/99

t -
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑yes ANo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes;No
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ YesNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ ,NiLtrogen�» ❑ Yes
12. Crop type SG�.C.....�`1ST1�4��. E P.,^ •v �i.l 1. .1.!'!.all5'� �.f..^.^.......... �....,�.. ,�................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint) es ❑�;O�
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ;;ess
es
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? SCE'" G�.,,,�e�t,--(_5— ---i� ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 21�0
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports), Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes IQI�o
!1
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency, situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes o11
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes IQN0
0: N.O.Vlalations:Or. deficiencies .were noted. during .this; visit:. Y.oti valI rerceive no further
corr. esriiHidence; about; this ;visit.; ; ; ;
Comments (refer to question .#) Explain any YES answers and/or any'recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility: to. better explain: situations. (use additional pages.as necessary)y x 3
no JA -4,-j4,11 L,' r f )s �,q4 Ls,% 1 h Or ci e-,.- 4-O Ftk t/wf'�►��✓ �
t= fvcn^1 1� L ir..� y�rt7� ��,. �-p ✓) Q.[.�f 3/ 1 0 (4 i 12 il.'f (y (,i. j ; ^ Q l
rrIS9' &a- 57s f20-1 10/A N-S C)¢/� �i-hdo, rI-Jf';q,J)"f,/
Tf
�-fz ;q A-( a r- yC_ f- fA,4 S. S f S n OJ o vY- p6
A/ o r ec-0y d.s 0 (= 6V "/cl C) /e . ► GJvv/Gib ,v�� ,f lU
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /,�yL, Date:

JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number W— - a 1
Farm Name:C)4 /�f%/a Prisd, Ii-. ek—,
On -Site RepresentativeQtw c.1 ��sc
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: -7;,j e-
Date of site visit:T/�
Date of most recent WUP:
FOR MAN ORY WA
Revised January 22, 1999
DETERMINATION
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to faof
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 & F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: n pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part Il. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part lll).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map. ^ zt Das ;5 h v 1= n,vp 64- -1
SyS V-%.- 4-o 6 --I-/Pe .
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

3 J,
Revised January 22, 1999
Facility Number =
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant_ null. nine_ or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers
denendino on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number Z - 0 Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: C ,1d ,- "s acre determination due to failure KF:4�)
f
On -Site Representative: Pt?411 �-�r� Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit: z �-
GZ e, f//
Date of most recent WUP:-. / - -,�
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D203 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART If. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application -of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation � records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; .failure to.deduct:required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage. identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5-acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Facility Number ��-
K-
Revised April 18, 1999
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' 2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
330
�b
2Q.�
29.9
Z9. q
00
D
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
P ��`' r,ti v-c
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations r to"Iadequate wetted acreage but unable to complete
evaluation due to the following reason(s):
P1 Plan lacks following information:
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate

t
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 9, 1999
NC Dept. of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Fans
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
Attn: Phillip Sykes
IT V__T
1 � •
moon
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWP420001
Additional Information Request
Caledonia Prison Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Halifax County
Dear Phillip Sykes:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 8, 1999:
I . Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.) for the three lagoons at
this facility. Be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that
may be applicable.
2. When utilizing soybeans in a crop rotation, residual nitrogen should be accounted for in the next crop. It
appears that the nitrogen residual from soybeans is not accounted for in the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP)
submitted. Please contact your technical specialist to review your WUP and revise the WUP to account for
residual nitrogen from soybeans, if necessary.
3. Your WUP lists the yield for cotton on tract 3304, fields 28 and 60 as 900 tons per acre. This is higher
than currently recommended. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the WUP or provide
justification that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP. Please note that all WUP
revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
4. In the WUP, the acreage for field 81, tract 3304, is listed as 36.4 acres, while the map provided only shows
34.7 acres for this field. Please address this discrepancy and make any revisions to the WUP or the map as
necessary.
5. On the certification for this facility in section 11, part D; the date listed for work completed on the
application and handling equipment is December 15, 1997. An irrigation design is required to be
submitted for this facility since the work was completed after September 30, 1996.
6. Please provide some documentation or other supporting information that shows that the lift pump required
to be installed in lagoon 1 and used to lift effluent to lagoon 3 (new) has been installed.
7. Please have your Waste utilization Plan completed by having the total pounds of PAN utilized calculated
and listed at the bottom of page 3 and on page 6, do the nitrogen balance by filling in the table.
8. Please provide a general location map showing some roads or other recognizable features. A topographic
map or a county road map can be copied for this purpose. Please also provide maps that identify (please
outline or highlight) and show the acreage for each field to be used for waste application. The maps
provided were difficult to read and the land application fields were hard to pick out. An explanation
(match lines and north arrows) of how these maps fit together would also be helpful. On these maps please
identify the three lagoons at the facility and the poultry houses associated with them.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 42-0001
Phillip Sykes
Page 2
9. It has been noted that Roanoke Rapids WWTP has a permit to dispose of sludge on fields at this facility.
Please provide maps of Roanoke Rapids' application fields in relation to the fields used for poultry lagoon
effluent irrigation. Please also provide either a signed statement or signed plan that indicates that no fields
will be used for both WWTP sludge application and lagoon effluent irrigation.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information
requested by this letter must be submitted on or before April 8, 1999 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Ral`e;igti Regional-Offic�, Water Quality
Permit File

NORTH CAROL INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
July 30, 1998
Mr. James Hassell, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 42-01
Caledonia Farm
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
On July 16, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
Compliance inspection at the subject poultry facility. The inspection revealed the
following deficiencies:
Severe erosion was noted around the two older waste lagoons due to the activity of
burrowing rodents. If this problem is not corrected it could be possible for
wastewater to actually break through the dike wall and enter the adjacent road side
ditch which flows to the nearby Roanoke River.
The new lagoon that was built last fall also has received some damage from
muskrats near the bottom of the interior dike wall.
Your waste plan calls for the installation of a lift pump to transport waste from the
# 2 lagoon to the new lagoon. To date, this lift pump has not been installed. Your
plan also call for the abandonment of a portion of your old # 2 lagoon so that the
flush water will be taken from the newer, cleaner hole. This construction should be
completed in a timely manner and checked off by the local District as well as an
Area NRCS Engineer.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27600
PHONE 81 G-371-4700 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 30% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Caledonia Farm
Page 2
These deficiencies should be corrected as soon as possible in order to avoid a possible
illegal discharge from your waste management system.
Please respond to this Notice within fourteen (l 4) days of your receipt outlining your
plans to make the necessary corrections. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates
your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this Notice
please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
L14
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

3 Div'sion of Soil and Water Conservation 13
Other Agency
z
ivision of Water Quality ,
ne O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered UrCertified 13 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational /_Date Last Operated:......,
FarmName: ./�..I ..� ..'...........!.�m..2.h-................................................. County: .... l�T A,.1�.�`........................: .................
Owner Owner Name: .....1 :.. ............ 1=...C�1�.� e 1 01' s................. Phone No• .;.� .....8L.G ..................
.-...3 � Z �.............._....�.
Facility Contact: ...nfiv.l...............v�SG�-Q................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ................................................ .
MailingAddress• ......�....3.... �`.ivi...... ...lio"y......... a.......... .2.. .i�7....................................................................................... ...................... ..
Onsite Representative: .... �!Q,l'1✓...................................................... Integrator:......
.......... .......... ...........................................................................
...........
Certified Operator:... 'C',!%.............(�t.:5.................................................................. Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm: 14A,-v i } G I — ,S /L // & ZL
I.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
F ..
Latitude • ` 46 Longitude ' 1 46
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Ueneral
1.
2.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Is any discharge from
❑ Yes
Z�0�
observed any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
Peo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes'
No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
N
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97

Facility Number: j_ -- 0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoonsliolding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: A-.l. ny1Q2 ........ � � ............... l
Freeboard(ft): ...... ...... ............. ..t....................... ..
..... ........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4 Structure 5
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
.............
❑ Yes
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ��No
❑ Yes Ja"0
❑ Yes 9<0
f............F...t9..........�.....I....................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? [[:]]Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 1 0
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/ins ction with on -site representative? ❑ YesFNo
o
Pe P
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ;No,/
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes
0 No.violitions or deficiencies. were noted during this.visit. You:will reeeive-no further
corresP0Oden0A oid this: visit: .:. . . . ... . .:.....:.:.:.: .
&e_ (�-a��-s zv-e.., j at.; � e ff1.1.e .na .� us��- ti r /�.s -�4 g.
(� 1,,. � J r �� � b l7 -�- � n'�-•��*, p � �4 �✓�4-6� l � �>z��� � �!!
I' Orl kSS tf !J D r: lam+ �9 vT
(� k•►M I S. G'r` F-V f s 1! %l9it [ Q yt/ D 0 f r%r D f /?s�S
7/25/97

MAR 09 '99 09:56AM
P.1
Division of 'Water Quality
Water Quality Section
P.O_' Box .29535
RaTeigh, rJ.C. 27626-0535
FAX:[phone]M 61os7
FAX TO- &e, . " &Ime �m/� FAX NUNMFR_ 733 — 7d 7
FROM ]>ia.pl,Ke.74o✓►1,aS
PHONE: (9 T 9)733-5083 Ext: 3 tg +
[No. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEFT:
-�I,yCS �. ot�td � v► � ✓ �v(�.�dY�d a.... �� ✓�'-e ��'v�'� vc
ova -�iuw� C emu` • " .
I.

MAR 09 '99 09:56AM
P.2
Mate of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
I
March 9; 199.0
NC Dept. of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
Attn: Phillip Sykes
fflz!,�W,A
17 0 0
�A&4qj;)
11111dw
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESPURCES
Subject: Application No. AWP420001
Additional Information Request
Caledonia Prison Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Halifax County
Dear Phillip Sykes:
Tile Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review.; Please address the following by April 8, 1999:
l . Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.) for the three lagoons at
this facility. Be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that
may be applicable_
2. When utilizing, soybeans in a crop rotation, residual nitrogen should be accounted for in the next crop. It
appears that the nitrogen residual from soybeans is not accounted for in the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP)
submitted. Please contact your technical 'specialist to review your WUP and revise the WUP to account for
residual nitrogen from soybeans, if necessary_;
3. Your WUP lists the yield for cotton on tract 3304, fields 28 and 60 as 900 tons per acre. This is higher
than currently recommended. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the WUP or provide
justification that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP. Please note that all WUP
revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
4. In the WUP, the acreage for field 81, tract 3364, is listed as 36.4 acres, while the map provided only shows
34.7 acres for this field. Please address this discrepancy and make any revisions to the WUP or the map as
necessary.
5. On the certification for this facility in section ji, part D; the date listed for work completed on the
application and handling equipment is Decetnber 15, 1997. An irrigation design is required to be
submitted for this facility since the work was completed after September 30, 1996.
10 Please provide some documentation or other supporting information that shows that the lift pump required
to be installed in lagoon I and used to lift effluent to lagoon 3 (new) has been installed.
i
7. Please have your Waste utilization Plan completed by having the total pounds of PAN utilized calculated
and listed at the bottom of page 3 and on page 6, do the nitrogen balance by filling in the table.
8. Please provide a general location map showing some roads or other recognizable features. A topographic
map or a county road map can be copiedfor this purpose. Please also provide snaps that identify (please
outline or highlight) and show the acreage for each field to be used for waste application. The maps
provided were difficult to read and the land application fields were hard to pick out. An explanation
(match lines and north aiTows) of how these maps IN together would also be helpful. On these traps please
identify the three lagoons at the facility and the poultry houses associated with them_
P.O. Box 29635, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer. 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MAR 09 '99 09:57AM P.3
Application No. 42-0001
Phillip Sykes i
Page 2
C 9J It has been noted that AMSCO has a permit for the land application of biosolids to fields at this facility.
Please provide maps of the application fields that AMSCO applies biosolids to ill relation to the fields used
for lagoon effluent irrigation from the poultry operation. Please also provide either a statement or plan that
indicates a strategy for ensuring that no Fields will be used for biosolids application and lagoon effluent
irrigation in the same year.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be sighed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information
requested by this letter must be submitted on or before April 8, 1999 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 21.1.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit_
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
Nonh Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the c riforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
if you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364
j Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc_ Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit Pile
AMSCO Qom- ?

RAL.EIGH REGIONAL. OFFICE
• �� ••�� 3800 8orrett Drive, Suite 101
NCDENR sleigh, NC 27609
F�fOlAC <IMI�OMMOf►
�..►� C,,,, NM..00,.R..s,.. or t6 Phone: 919/571-�4700 FAX [phone]
AMD
FACSIMILE
You should be receiving 6 pages (including cover sheet).
If you do not receive all pages, please contact sender at 919/5714700.
TO: Ca P" M � � g S FROM: l7tCS �Pz✓ .�- �/
ORGANIZATION: W c ) q SUBJECT: cow
FAX NUMBER 1 - 33 - DATE:
MESSAGE:
, rk-.
a- fiqr.e _S oA e l e
`;! C Pig' F ,a ri(
.1i-'f 7L-I,-,-
y� ,fie th11 lam

01.01.2080 as:00 P' z
FROM
USDA - NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
A.O. BOX 10, 201 Saint Andrews Street �~
rarboro, North Carolina 27886
August 13, 1997
Rodney Gusler
North Carolina Department of Correction
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Gusler:
I have Inspected the new waste treatment lagoon constructed at Caledonia Prison Farrn
and found that it has been constructed and seeded according to MRCS standards and
specifications. The staff from our Halifax Field Office checked the lagoon routinely
during construction.
The following Is a Ilat of work that needs to be completed in order to acquire .0200
certification.
Construct a diversion between the new and existing lagoons to divert surface runoff.
Set pumping markers to show the start and end pumping elevations.
Inspect buildings, flush tanks, pipes: etc to make sure there are no leaks and repair
accordingly.
Install a transfer pump in lagoon #1 to lift effluent into the new lagoon (lagoon 43). The
discharge pipe Into lagoon #3 should be placed on a bent support and the slope
protected so erosion does not occur. This can be done by attaching a flexible pipe to
the discharge pipe or by the placement of stone.
Recycling water for the buildings would be more desirable out of lagoon #3 than out of
the canal running from lagoon #2 to the pump station. The pipe from the pumping
station should be reworked In order to recycle out of lagoon #3. The canal should be
filled In at the point where It connects wlth lagoon #2. In order to construct an earthen
plug at this point the liquid level In lagoon #2 will have to be lowered, The plug should
be constructed with compacted clay and have a minimum top width of ten feet.
Please contact me or the Halifax Field Office before installing any pipe through the new
lagoon embankment and for further Instructions on the placement of the earthen plug.
Sincerely,
rt�
Jo . Sherrod d 1900
Civil Engineer
FENFFRING

SPE�f��qq qq q
L�LYMPI CS
PROUD SPONSOR
1-888-767-1999
North Carolina Department of Correction
214 West Jones Street • P.O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
September 8, 1998
TO: Mr. Newell Brooks
Purchasing Agent
FR: Mr. Phillip Sykes
Y
Caledonia Farm Manager
RE: Req. # 4250015304
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
On August 3, 1998, I received a letter from Mr. Ken Schuster, Regional Water Quality
Supervisor stating the deficiencies at our poultry facility. Upon receiving this information, I
immediately implemented a trapping program to rid the lagoon of this rodent problem. This
program has been very effective and is still currently in place.
Another concern was the installation of a series of pumps and a source of power. In order
for this project to be completed, the installation of a power line is required. The power lines will
provide power to three pumps, a lift pump to regulate the level of waste water in the lagoons, an
irrigation pump to irrigate the adjacent hay field and a flush pump to flush the poultry houses as
required. We have met with Andy Snead from Central Engineering regarding the placement of
power poles and power lines to the lagoon area. The scope of this project requires the
installation of four (4) forty foot poles and five (5) guy wires and anchors. Install four (4) spans
of three phase # 2 aluminum primary conductor with neutral and remove (3) spans of three phase
# 6 copper primary conductor and neutral including removal of three poles, guy wires and
anchors.
A power supply is desperately needed at our poultry facility. As the enclosed letters
state, the deadline was December 31, 1997. The urgency of this project is not life threatening but
environmental impact could be life threatening. If the recent hurricanes or tropical storms had
brought a large amount of water with them, without pumps at the lagoons, the lagoons could
have suffered. Fortunately, this did not occur.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

As stated earlier, this could become environmentally dangerous if recent rains continue.
These lagoons can only hold a certain amount of water. Without these pumps in place, we have
no way to regulate or maintain the correct waste water level. Therefore, if a lagoon were to
overfill and enter the adjacent ditch which flows to the Roanoke River, the environment would
be at risk. Also, if this would occur it would be considered an illegal discharge and fines or
penalties could follow.
Hopefully, with your assistance on the project and by Caledonia Farms obtaining price
quotes, we can speed this project ahead and in a timely manner. It is urgent that we complete
this project as soon as possible. Time is not on our side.
Thank you for your assistance and speed. If I may be of any future help, please contact
me at 252 826 5784.
Attachments:
cc: Jim Godwin, Acting Enterprise Director
v'Ken Schuster - Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Wayne Short - District Conservationist
Andy Snead - Engineering
,David Inscoe - Poultry Supervisor
File

r,'M sTnr� I AUG
- p
ll I IA.
a'o
North Carolina Department of Correction
214 West Jones Street • P.O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Mack Jarvis, Secretary
Mr. Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 42-01
Caledonia Farm
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In response to your letter dated July 30, 1998, revealing the deficiencies at our poultry
operation, we have implemented the following corrective measures.
The deficiencies noted at the two older waste lagoons from rodent damage will be
corrected through trapping. We have ordered several approved rodents traps to place
at these areas. Additionally, we have contacted an outside person to assist us in the
trapping of the muskrats at the newer lagoon. In the future, we will monitor the dike
area more closely for rodent damage.
The construction of the lift pump in our waste plan is at Central Engineering. We have
met with Andy Snead from Central Engineering regarding the placement of the power
supply to the lagoon area. Everyone has agreed on the direction in which.the line
should go and the placement of power poles. We have implemented to complete this
part of construction by contacting several outside vendors for a price quote. Upon
receiving the price quotes and the selection of the vendor, work will begin immediately.
Upon completion of the power line supply, we will contact Central Engineering on
installation of the lift pump. I am confident that Central Engineering will begin their
process as soon as possible. We all have good intentions of completing this project as
soon as possible and in a timely manner to avoid any illegal discharge from our waste
management system.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

nank you for your time and concerns regarding our waste management system here at
Caledonia Farms. If I may be of any assistance in the future, please call me at (252)
826-5784.
Sincerely,
Phillip Sykes
Farm Manager
cc: Jim Godwin
Acting Enterprise Director

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 8, 1999
NC Dept. of Corrections
Caledonia Prison Farm \.4`
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887 l \
Attn: Phillip Sykes � \ A199
9 /S'ubject:
F
i
Dear Phillip Sykes:
1�
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Application No. AWP420001
Additional Information Request
Caledonia Prison Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Halifax County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is requiredbefore we can continue our review. Please address the following by May 8, 1999:
1. The residual nitrogen from the soybeans should be credited on the crop following the soybeans. Your
Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) appears to take the residual off of the soybeans giving them less nitrogen
per acre but still applying the same amount of nitrogen on the crops following soybeans. As you have
cropping options in your plan, you may choose to have a note put into the narrative of the WUP stating that
the residual nitrogen will be accounted for on any crop that follows soybeans. Any changes to the WUP
need to be signed and dated by both the technical specialist and the owner (or an agent of the owner).
In your letter of response you stated that the pump station needed has not yet been installed and that a
portable pbmp is being used to transfer waste. Please provide detailed information showing that this pump
is suffici ntly sized to handle the amount of waste necessary, that this pump will be in place and available
to ensu r6 that there is no overflow of the lagoons and provide measures that are in place to prevent any
runoffpr release of waste as a result of failure of this pump or disconnecting of the pump and its piping.
Also in your letter, it is stated that this pump is used to transfer waste from lagoon #1 to lagoon 43. Please
clarify this. Is lagoon #2 being skipped entirely? From what I can tell from the information in the
application package, waste flows into lagoon #1 (volume 77,713 cu ft.), then into lagoon #2 (volume
311,182 cu ft.) and is then transferred to Lagoon #3 (volume 507,770 cu ft.). If lagoon #2 is not being
used, please show that there is enough treatment volume in the lagoon system. An overall narrative of how
the waste is handled in regards to the three lagoons may help clear up these questions.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before May 8, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
�J)A��C'
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional_Offce,—Water-Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

fPECIALUJA
PROUD SPONSOR
1-888-767-1999
North Carolina Department of Correction
214 West Jones Street • P.O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
September 8, 1998
TO: Mr. Newell Brooks
Purchasing Agent
FR: Mr. Phillip Sykes
O�
Y
Caledonia Farm Manager
RE: Req. # 4250015304
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
On August 3, 1998, I received a letter from Mr. Ken Schuster, Regional Water Quality
Supervisor stating the deficiencies at our poultry facility. Upon receiving this information, I
immediately implemented a trapping program to rid the lagoon of this rodent problem. This
program has been very effective and is still currently in place.
Another concern was the installation of a series of pumps and a source of power. In order
for this project to be completed, the installation of a power line is required. The power lines will
provide power to three pumps, a lift pump to regulate the level of waste water in the lagoons, an
irrigation pump to irrigate the adjacent hay field and a flush pump to flush the poultry houses as
required. We have met with Andy Snead from Central Engineering regarding the placement of
power poles and power lines to the lagoon area. The scope of this project requires the
installation of four (4) forty foot poles and five (5) guy wires and anchors. Install four (4) spans
of three phase # 2 aluminum primary conductor with neutral and remove (3) spans of three phase
# 6 copper primary conductor and neutral including removal of three poles, guy wires and
anchors.
A power supply is desperately needed at our poultry facility. As the enclosed letters
state, the deadline was December 31, 1997. The urgency of this project is not life threatening but
environmental impact could be life threatening. If the recent hurricanes or tropical storms had
brought a large amount of water with them, without pumps at the lagoons, the lagoons could
have suffered. Fortunately, this did not occur.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

As stated earlier, this could become environmentally dangerous if recent rains continue.
These lagoons can only hold a certain amount of water. Without these pumps in place, we have
no way to regulate or maintain the correct waste water level. Therefore, if a lagoon were to
overfill and enter the adjacent ditch which flows to the Roanoke River, the environment would
be at risk. Also, if this would occur it would be considered an illegal discharge and fines or
penalties could follow.
Hopefully, with your assistance on the project and by Caledonia Farms obtaining price
quotes, we can speed this project ahead and in a timely manner. It is urgent that we complete
this project as soon as possible. Time is not on our side.
Thank you for your assistance and speed. If I may be of any future help, please contact
me at 252 826 5784.
Attachments:
cc: Jim Godwin, Acting Enterprise Director
✓Ken Schuster - Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Wayne Short - District Conservationist
Andy Snead - Engineering
&David Inscoe - Poultry Supervisor
File

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Division of Water Quality
March 10, 1999
Mr. Phillip Sykes, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Notice of Violation
Caledonia Farm
Illegal Discharge
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Sykes:
On February 8, 1999, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted an inspection of your poultry facility in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.
0217. While conducting the inspection Mr. Towell discovered that the existing
equipment designed to wash sweet potatoes and other vegetables on the farm unit
was designed to discharge process water into an open ditch which is an unnamed
tributary to the Roanoke River.
Mr. Towell also determined that new process facility had also been designed to
discharge water into waters of the State without first applying for, and receiving the
appropriate permit.
The above referenced discharge is a violation of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1.(a) which states:
No person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following
activities until or unless such person shall have applied for and received from the
Commission a permit therefor and shall have complied with such conditions, if
any as are prescribed by such permit .......... make any outlets into waters of the
State.
P.O. BOX 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0935
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Phillip Sykes
Page 2
In order to correct this situation you should immediately cease any discharging from both the
existing facility and the newly constructed unit located adjacent to the distribution warehouse.
The Division of Water Quality encourages you to seek a non -discharging alternative to your
current method of disposing of vegetable processing water. You should be aware that current
regulations will prohibit any new discharges into ditches or other no -flow water bodies.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. You should
include in your response the actions that you will take to eliminate the illegal discharge from
your washing operation. Also, please provide this office with the following information:
1. The types and amounts of vegetables that you process at this facility.
2. The volume of process water used at the facility. This may be by the batch or by the day,
week, or month.
3. The type and amount, if any, of chemicals that may be used for cleaning or disinfection.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this Notice you may call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
ZaL
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Dillard, Halifax County Health Department
Mr. J. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
Mr. Charles Weaver, DWQ NPDES Unit
RRO Files
NOVCAL
L

s..
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Division of Water Quality
March 10, 1999
Mr. Phillip Sykes, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Notice of Violation
Caledonia Farm
Illegal Discharge
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Sykes:
On February 8, 1999, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted an inspection of your poultry facility in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.
0217. While conducting the inspection Mr. Towell discovered that the existing
equipment designed to wash sweet potatoes and other vegetables on the farm unit
was designed to discharge process water into an open ditch which is an unnamed
tributary to the Roanoke River.
Mr. Towell also determined that new process facility had also been designed to
discharge water into waters of the State without first applying for, and receiving the
appropriate permit.
The above referenced discharge is a violation of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1.(a) which states:
No person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following
activities until or unless such person shall have applied for and received from the
Commission a permit therefor and shall have complied with such conditions, if
any as are prescribed by such permit .......... make any outlets into waters of the
State.
P.O. BOX 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Phillip Sykes
Page 2
In order to correct this situation you should immediately cease any discharging from both the
existing facility and the newly constructed unit located adjacent to the distribution warehouse.
The Division of Water Quality encourages you to seek a non -discharging alternative to your
current method of disposing of vegetable processing water. You should be aware that current
regulations will prohibit any new discharges into ditches or other no -flow water bodies.
Please respond to this .Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. You should
include in your response the actions that you will take to eliminate the illegal discharge from
your washing operation. Also, please provide this office with the following information:
1. The types and amounts of vegetables that you process at this facility.
2. The volume of process water used at the facility. This may be by the batch or by the day,
week, or month.
3. The type and amount, if any, of chemicals that may be used for cleaning or disinfection.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this Notice you may call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Dillard, Halifax County Health Department
Mr. J. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
Mr. Charles Weaver, DWQ NPDES Unit
RRO Files
NOVCAL

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Mr. James Hassell, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 42-25
Caledonia Cattle
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
On October 22, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
It has been determined that pastured cattle operations need not be
registered under the State animal waste regulations. Therefor,
please find attached, a form for the removal of your operation from
the current listing of animal facilities.
If you need additional information or if you have any questions or
comments concerning this matter, please call either Mr. Buster
Towell or myself at [phone].
Sincerel - ^ -A-fi-
,A
�dy Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District (Halifax County)
Mr. Steve Bennett, DSWC-RRO
Compliance Files
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, ' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%q C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

FROM
21.01.2080 a0:00 P. 2
USDA - NATURAL RESDURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
P.O. BOX 10, 201 Saint Andrews Street
rarboro, North Carolina 27886
August 13, 1097
Rodney Gusler
North Carolina Department of Correction
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Gusler:
I have Inspected the new waste treatment lagoon constructed at Caledonia Prison Farm
and found that it has been constructed and seeded according to NRCS standards and
specifications, The staff from our Halifax Field Office checked the lagoon routinely
during construction.
The following Is a Ilse of work that needs to be completed in order to acquire .0200
certification,
Construct a diversion between the new and existing lagoons to divert surface runoff.
Set pumping markers to show the start and end pumping elevations.
Inspect buildings, flush tanks, pipes, etc. to make sure there are no leaks and repair
accordingly.
Install a transfer pump in lagoon #1 to lift effluent into the new lagoon (lagoon 43). The
dlecharge pipe Into lagoon 03 should be placed on a bent support and the slope
protected so erosion does not occur. This can be done by attaching a flexible pipe to
the discharge pipe or by the placement of stone.
Recycling water for the buildings would be more desirable out of lagoon #3 than out of
the canal running from lagoon 92 to the pump station. The pipe from the pumping
station should be reworked In order to recycle out of lagoon #3. The canal Should be
filled In at the point where It connects with lagoon Q. In order to construct an earthen
plug at this point the liquid level In lagoon #2 will have to be lowered. The plug should
be constructed with compacted clay and have a minimum top width of ten feet.
Please contact me or the Halifax Field Office before installing any pipe through the new
lagoon embankment and for further instructions on the placement of the earthen plug.
Sincerely,
afie-.� 0
Jo . Sherrod d {9�
w
Civil Engineer _

r
AUG 1810
ICrdkl IJFHCE
North Carolina Department of Correction
214 West Jones Street • P.O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Mr. Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 42-01
Caledonia Farm
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
In response to your letter dated July 30, 1998, revealing the deficiencies at our poultry
operation, we have implemented the following corrective measures.
The deficiencies noted at the two older waste lagoons from rodent damage will be
corrected through trapping. We have ordered several approved rodents traps to place
at these areas. Additionally, we have contacted an outside person to assist us in the
trapping of the muskrats at the newer lagoon. In the future, we will monitor the dike
area more closely for rodent damage.
The construction of the lift pump in our waste plan is at Central Engineering. We have
met with Andy Snead from Central Engineering regarding the placement of the power
supply to the lagoon area. Everyone has agreed on the direction in which the line
should go and the placement of power poles. We have implemented to complete this
part of construction by contacting several outside vendors for a price quote. Upon
receiving the price quotes and the selection of the vendor, work will begin immediately.
Upon completion of the power line supply, we will contact Central Engineering on
installation of the lift pump. I am confident that Central Engineering will begin their
process as soon as possible. We all have good intentions of completing this project as
soon as possible and in a timely manner to avoid any illegal discharge from our waste
management system.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

k
Thank you for your time and concerns regarding our waste management system here at
Caledonia Farms. If I may be of any assistance in the future, please call me at (252)
826-5784.
Sincerely,
'-/-7�✓,lam �"/
Phillip Sykes
Farm Manager
cc: Jim Godwin
Acting Enterprise Director

MSTATE
North Carolina Department of Correction
1 /�
214 West Jones Street • P.O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
October 16, 1997
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Health &
Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh , North Carolina 27609
Re: Consensual agreement
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
As I am responsible for the completion of the Wastewater Management
Plan for the State of North Carolina, specifically the Caledonia layer operation
located in Halifax County, I request the State Department of Environmental
Health & Natural Resources, extend our December 31, 1997, dead line.
We have worked hard to comply with all regulatory issues concerning this
project. However, due to changing the design to accommodate our needs here at
Caledonia, Dr. Sneed will be unable to render a second plan until the middle to
later part of November. As a state agency, I will be required to bid this work out
and the process will more than likely carry us well into the month of December
before a contract can be reached.
I will try to expedite all matters relative to this project but fear that
completion may fall after the designated dead line. Please consider extending
our time to properly install a system that will prove to be in the best interest of our
State. Your guidance and support are greatly appreciated.
cc: Wayne Short
Jim Godwin
Your Friend in Agriculture,
William J. Hassell
Director of Farm Operations
North Carolina Department of Corrections
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

• Stake of North Carolina -
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
William West
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
Dear Mr. West:
�40
1Y 2- —1
HOC,
ria
[DEH
November 6, 1997
4\
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
R
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each'
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 c',p: more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
/A

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt..Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please.
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely, N�
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
August 3, 1997
Mr. Johnny Hassell, Manager
Caledonia Farm Unit
P.O. Box, 6 7
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Caledonia Poultry
Facility # 42-01
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
On July 29, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management
Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
Both of your waste lagoons had approximately 12 and 14 inches of
freeboard which is less than the amount required. Animal waste
lagoons are required to maintain enough freeboard so that no
discharge of wastewater will occur to waters of the State during
any rainfall event less severe than a 25 year\24 hour storm.
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days
of receipt. You should include in your response the actions that
you will take to address these deficiencies.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609NiC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Johnny Hassell
Page 2
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schus er, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District (Halifax)
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD\42-01

0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up ofDWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Q
Farm Status: egistered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection 17 29-5 71
Time of Inspection Z, fl 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and nrocessinv)
❑l Not
Operational Date Last Operated: ........................................................................�...._./......................................................................
FarmName:..6rfl..f..rfl...'......................................................... County:.. `:il'A(....�..�i�...............................................
Land Owner Name:.61...K:......�...... �.f .... e Ci�..�3..... Phone No: .... ..l..%. ........ ? .?.��...... s l". .. ............
Facility Conctact:... ilfi............................. Title:................................................ Phone No:..........................................................
Mailing Address:......0.........4.......t....&..7 ............ ...............t..`AIL..........` .c.................a-1....P.......
......................... I ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:...`...............................................................,
Certified Operator:..... ( .!. ......... r......................................... Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm: S l/
Latitude • 4 Gi
of Operation and
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Other
Longitude • 4 «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Cl
Subsurface Drains Present
Lagoon Area 17FSnra
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Field Area
❑ Yes. ErNo
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N�
i�
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number:
A f1.......
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Ek o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes L'JNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.........1. 2:. ......... ...... /.:1`............ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes O No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....!!''�5............................................................................................................ /.....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan I A P)? b ❑ Yes ❑ No
�
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? / i /P/i ❑ Yes
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑Yes o
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes [:]No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r��1 Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

North Carolina Department of Correction
214 West Jones Street • P.O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Department of Environmental
Health and Natural Resources
Kenneth Schuster, P.E., Regional Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Subject: Deficiency Notice - Caledonia Poultry
Response
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
August 15, 1997
AUG 1 8 1997
` 1
�DEHNR RALEIGH REGI0f-4A1 0FF-ICE
In response to the compliance inspection on July 29, 1997, please accept this letter of
confirmation regarding Caledonia Farms. As part of the ongoing construction of an
additional lagoon at our poultry operation, we amended the contract that the State of
North Carolina entered into with Sykes Grading Service. Attached for your records is the
Change Order # 1 under Contract No. 2823. The increase of the top of the berm on lagoon
#2 has been corrected and is sustained at an elevation of 49.
Pending completion of design work, Caledonia Farms will submit an animal waste
management plan. We are working with our area Soil and Water Conservation District
Office in Halifax County. Also included you will find a letter from Joy Sherrod from USDA.
Natural Resources Conservation Service with construction concurrence relative to NRCS
standards. As always, thank you for the service that your office provides us at Caledonia
Farms. Any additional information required will promptly be forwarded to your office.
cc: Les Martin
Wayne Short
Sincerely,
0. 9. /4�L
William J. Hassell
Director of Farm Operations
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

FROM
01.01.2080 00*-08 P. 3
North Carolina Department of Correction
P. 0. Box 29540 a Raleigh, North Carolina 27616.0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Govemor
August 6, 1997
Sykes Grading Service
Route 2, Box 297
Conway, NC 27820
Re: Caledonia Pam
Wastewater Lagoon
Job Order No: 1156
Contract No: 2923
Change Order 01
Dear Sir:
Mack Jarvis, Secretary
Enclosed is your finalized copy of the above referenced changer order, This change order is an
addition in the amount of $1800., bringing the total contract amount to $18,200.
If you have any questions relating to this change, please feel free to call Mr. Rodney Gusler at
[phone].
Sincerely,
G.J. Freeman, PE
Design Services Manager
Central Englnebring Division
GJF/bmk
Enclosure
CC! BMK w/ original
RRG, LWY, GJF, R
Central Engineering - 2020 Yorkers Road 9 P.O. Box 29540 - Raleigh, NC 27626.0540
Telephone [phone] - Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity I Alrinmativb Action Employer

FROM
01.01.2090 00:00
P. 4
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
Caledonia Prison Farm
Tillery, North Carolina
Job Order No.: 1156
Contract No.: 2823
Contractor:
Sykes Grading Servicc
Route 2, Box 297
Conway, North Carolina 27820
rk
Under the terms of the contract and without invalidating the original provisions thereof, the
followitl$ change in work is authorized for the change in contract amount herein set forth:
(Description of change order with detailed cost breakdown attached)
The time of completion including previous orders is 45 calendar days and shall be
increased by 2 calendar days by this change order for a revised contract date of completion
of August 22, 1997 ,
CONTRACT COST SUMMARY:
TOTALS
1. Original Contract Amount ................. . ............... $ 16.40 .00
2. Amount of Previous Orders:
Add $ 0.00 Deduct $ OM _
3. Amount of This Order:
Add $ 1.800.00 Deduct $ 0.00 --
4. Total of lines 2 & 3:
S 1,900.00, Minus Total Deducts: $ IN $ 1.6 0.00
5, Revised Contract Total Amount ... , ................. $ 18.2o_0o
6. The owner certifies that the contingency Hind balance after
this change is; ......... ................ , . ............. $ l9,294.70

FROM
01.01.2080 00:00 p, 3
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE:
To increase the top of berm elevation of existing lagoon #2 to a minimum eleeavation of 49.0.
Top of berm width shall be 12'± and side slopes shall match existing. Material to be used shall
be approved materials from site. Work shall include removal and stockpiling topsoil, excavation,
hauling, compacting of embankment material in accordance with the contract documents.
REASON FOR CHANGE:
Requested by owner to increase freeboard of existing lagoon 42,.
By;
��g 9S�i,,LL ) Q,
Sykes Grading S ice
By: L -
NCDOC • Director of Engineering
DISTRIBUTION:
1 Original to Owner
I Original to Contractor
Date:
Date: __T��� 7
***END***

North Carolina Department of Correction
831 West Morgan Street • P. O. Box 29540 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James 13. Hunt Jr., Governor Franklin Freeman, Secretary
September 7, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, PE
Regional Supervisor,
Division of Environmental Management
Raleigh Regional Office
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to Management Deficiency Notification
Dated August 2, 1995
DOC Enterprises Caledonia Farm Layer Operation
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
The following responds to
Notification":
1. The lagoon level has
freeboard.
your "Management Deficiency
been pulled down to a 20"-24"
2. The lagoon spraying system's cut hose has been replaced with
rigid pipe and the spray nozzles have been located to insure
that no water will enter the adjacent drainage ditch.
The above information was relayed to you by copy of the Farm
Operations Manager's (William J. Hassell) memorandum dated August
25, 1995. According to Mr. Hassell the corrections immediately
following Mr. Buster Towell's site inspection July 24, 1995.
Also, initial steps have been taken to initiate completion of an
animal waste management plan.
Please call if more information is needed (919 850 2895).
incerely,
Gurnie Lee, PE
Central Engineering
cc: K.L. Kautzky
William Stovall
Les Martin
William J. Hassell
GOE/DRY/SAO/GRL/R File/E/File
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

- •„a STATE
yvcV1`u-rn rM� y+ 1
North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises
P. O. Box 29540
Chapanoke Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Les Martin Franklin Freeman, Secretary
Enterprise Director
Date: August 25, 1995
To: Gurnie Lee, PE<:
Central Engineering 4 {.
�19195 `
From: William J. Hassell
Farm Operations Manager ! �`
Re: Corrective Action/Lagoon
Caledonia Farm
In accordance with Mr. Buster Towell and your recommendations
for the appropriate corrective action for the Enterprise layer
operations lagoon.
1. The freeboard on our lagoon was less than 12 inches and to avoid
any breaching during periods of heavy rains, the following
corrective action has been implemented.
Corrective Action Taken- The pump that pulls the water from our
lagoon was moved and placed to allow direct diversion of lagoon
water. As an additional precaution we moved it so in the event of
a pump or hose disconnect, any water loss would drain directly back
into the lagoon. The lagoon level has been pulled down to a 20"-24"
freeboard.
2. The lagoon spraying system was noted to have a damaged hose and
was spraying too close to a drainage ditch. '
Corrective Action Taken- The flexible 4" line has been replaced
with rigid irrigation pipe. The spray nozzles 'in our intensive
grazing pastures have been relocated to insure that no water will
enter a drainage ditch.
Phone: [phone] Courier # 53-71-00 FaY (91 M 4A')-eAno

a
Central Engineering
August 25, 1995
Page 2
3. An animal waste water. management plan ( required by December
1997 )
Action Taken - See attached ( Letter to initiate plan )
cc:Les Martin
K.L. Kautzky
W. Stoval
Kenneth Schuster

North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises
P. O. Box 29540
Chapanoke Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Date: August 24, 1995
Les Martin Franklin Freeman, Secretary
Enterprise Director
To: Steve Bennett
Regional Coordinator, Division of
Soil and Water Conservation
From: William J. Hassell
Caledonia Farms
Farm Operations Manager
Enterprise Division
Re: Animal waste management plan
In order that I may comply with all required water quality
regulations and guide lines for implementing an animal waste
management plan, please give me a call or written instruction as to
the procedures that I must follow to ensure that we at Enterprise
are in complete compliance. I realize that the deadline is many
months away, but due to the nature and scope of this required plan,
you and your staff will certainly have many other private and
corporate plans to cover. Thank you for any assistance concerning
this matter.
William J. Hassell
P. 0. Box 67
Tillery, N. C. 27887
Phone: [phone]
cc:Les Martin
K.L. Kautzky
Phone' (919) 6624400 C niirier * iI-71-no Rev (41Q) AAA-neno

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
August 2, 1995
Mr. William N. Stoval
Chief of Engineering
North Carolina Department of Correction
1001 Navaho Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
-tow
.-..ram
OL
EDEHI.VR
.-MEN
C�
AUG - 9 1995 E
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Caledonia Layer Operation
North Carolina Highway 561
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Stoval:
On July 24, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit'4etermined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoon has little freeboard, less than 12 inches in some
areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in order
to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breach.
-It was also observed that your hydrant system has a cut hose
and that your sprayer was located in close proximity to a
drainage ditch. In order to pump out your lagoon to
recommended levels the hose should be repaired and the
sprayer should be moved to a location further away from the
ditch.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional.Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues within
30 days of receipt of this letter.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

Caledonia Layer Operation
Management Deficiency Notification
Page 2
You should specifically address how you plan to correrct these
problems and submit a schedule (with dates) stating when these
management deficiencies will be corrected.
Effecti.'ve wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in.
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
/1(
Kenn tti Schuster, P.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, UJ v-ia}d�--- j
Water Conservation�'
AUG !995
'3 �__-..._ ._......

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Air MWA
•
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEEHNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Caledonia Farm
PO Box 67
Tillery NC 27887
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Caledonia Farm
Facility ID #: 42-1
Halifax County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System " •, .� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10°k post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A��
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Mr. James Hassell, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 42-01
Caledonia Poultry
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
On October 22, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the poultry operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. As a result
of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with
the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997.. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, i
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Nf C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50°k recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Caledonia Poultry
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District (Halifax County)
Mr. Steve Bennett -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

DS%'VC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of [)1N Q inspection O Follow-up of DS«'C review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
FFacility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of Hours
Farm Status: ffRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.2; for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 :Not Operational j Date Last Operated: .................................................................................... j ............................................................
Farm Name: ...C.��..�...�..�Z1..�...)...�........... �............................ County:.......,�......r6k x............................................
Owner Name: .....�A. l G'...ti?...11..q, ......r 1 `Sv.k��...T...!'y� �..�tQ Phone No:....................................................................................... .... .... .......
Facility Contact: ..J.QA�Li./�i.....,..., ,5-L.�........ Title:.. t ..�..............Q.u:.g. :r.. Phonc No:.... f I .......
Mailing., �,D r r/O 7 /..1..�� ir......, Z— 7� .
Onsite Representative: ...... Z...MA.......................................................................... Integrator: ....N.i...ry.,.....-J,. �..`(..'.....................................
Certified Operator:....... v..l\, ;....... -.F�, ..I1.�...�,.. �... e,......... Operator Certification Number :.............
v
.........5........1..1......3..........d::�:Z.::�......................................................................
.. ..
Latitude • 14 Longitude ©• ®"
Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population .. Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer Q p�� r 5 Al1li
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW.' �. p"
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ■ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes O<Ceo
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes
b. 11"discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQI / v ❑ Yes
c. If dischar_e is observed, what is the estiniuted flow in sal/min? A
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ye•, notify DWQ)r ❑Yes
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pant of the operation? ❑ Yes
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge.'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
nlal nlenand/1n1p1'Oveme nt'�
4/30/97
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
E�No
Uf No
❑ No
Continued nit back

FaciJity Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
t
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? �8� Z 81 9/
Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? pl,A, 5 Yes
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)d�
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 6 ❑ Yes
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
.....................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
tld No
❑ No
❑ No
t1Q No
Structure 6
....... ........ I .................
❑ Yes allo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes O'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ��JO �❑ Yes eiNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DNVQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Oyes ❑ No
NVaste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes CdNo
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.....................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
...................._..,..
..............
El Yes lye No
❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? la. v 'Wj iAtrT: `t Qf Yes ❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ��ap_ av AV �
VYes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
V"'No
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7 Date: M_ ���
cc: Division of Water Quality, Watft Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina If
Department of Environment,
,� Health and Natural Resources 1 ?WA •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary R
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Mr. James Hassell, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 42-01
Caledonia Poultry
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
On October 22, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the poultry operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. As a result
of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with
the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, i
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/100/. post -consumer paper

V_
Caledonia Poultry
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
it Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District (Halifax County)
Mr. Steve Bennett -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

Facility Number: qj_ 0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? .
Structures Magoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(fr) ...». �T� ��...._»�. ...., . {.»r�..... _..... _. ».... 6,p...1....._ ..........._...........»....» ..». »......_»........» ........». » ....
10. Is an seepage any*of observed from of the structures? ❑ Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? es ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes P" O
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type�t�..f�.....t...�,s.................. ....... ....... ................... ...._...................».............._.._...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes J� �o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving cropneed improvement? ❑ Yes No
P
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0
21. Did Reviewer/Ins ector fail to discuss review/ins ction with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
P Pe P
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only;
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
No.violations or deficiencies. were -noted -daring this"Osit.- You401 irecei've,no further :
correspbadeike Ahobt this:visit ,
to question ()::Explain any YF.S answers ai
H �'~.r �v , �1 e ff �e rn�9n,� .y,ks/G-e-1 ti r/e j '-4,c
�,�,�. � d ►�:s�' - � � y ��A'a-�-j�., p � �4 %��,"<� l � f �ql"�� � - .rAvo.'r ftGG Jr
r- �. � � • �f e � � f Q••►->� i v11�+ , �kSS c.s f" 1>J � L l./�-� e c�" rt/ L G/v
AL
�lv►r► ( S . �'�" �/'i ��1�5 I'l
7/25/97

ok`
I
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
July 30, 1998
Mr. James Hassell, Farm Manager
N.C. Department of Corrections
Caledonia Farm
P.O. Box 67
Tillery, North Carolina 27887
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 42-01
Caledonia Farm
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
On July 16, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
Compliance inspection at the subject poultry facility. The inspection revealed the
following deficiencies:
Severe erosion was noted around the two older waste lagoons due to the activity of
burrowing rodents. If this problem is not corrected it could be possible for
wastewater to actually break through the dike wall and enter the adjacent road side
ditch which flows to the nearby Roanoke River.
The new lagoon that was built last fall also has received some damage from
muskrats near the bottom of the interior dike wall.
Your waste plan calls for the installation of a lift pump to transport waste from the
# 2 lagoon to the new lagoon. To date, this lift pump has not been installed. Your
plan also call for the abandonment of a portion of your old # 2 lagoon so that the
flush water will be taken from the newer, cleaner hole. This construction should be
completed in a timely manner and checked off by the local District as well as an
Area NRCS Engineer.
8800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27608
PHONE O 10-871-4700 FAX [phone] B
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Caledonia Farm
Page 2
These deficiencies should be corrected as soon as possible in order to avoid a possible
illegal discharge from your waste management system.
Please respond to this Notice within fourteen (14) days of your receipt outlining your
plans to make the necessary corrections. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates
your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this Notice
please call Mr. Buster Towel] at [phone].
Sincerely,
41-4
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

0 Div' ion of Soil and Water Conservation (> Other Agency
Idwivision of Water Quality
LOrRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ Inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other _
Date of Inspection]
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:tnm)
0 Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:/ 1..'..�1_'..!__. 1-r9 2 w-..__.... _.....__....._..... County: ... 1�1! ./-W_�`... _»..»»...._.._........._.....»
Owner Name: ».../i! :.. :..._ .... �... C � i a 641 u . ........... Phone No:.;.?.'
o:.;. Z. �.... Z.!i .. s~� Z .._......_..__
FacilityContact: „Q�!`fiv.,!...... ....'` rG'e.___...»..... Title: ... ..».................. _._..._.......»......__... Phone No: »...._....__......»......»......_......»
MailingAddress:.A; ..._3... .... 7....T'../%a...` .........!!a ..... _...� 2..tl'..:�7................ ...................................__......................_..... ... ..._.....
» ...._»
Onsite Representative:... ......�!a ��lQ''..................... _.... __...... ...... ......... Integrator: ...... ��!�:...................................... ............... ......... ..
11 LL
Certified Operator:._S(.� 1............W iS ..._......_....._._...._................_...... Operator Certification Number• ...__....._............._._....
Location of Farm: 14w } G / —
........ .......................... _.... ._.... _................. ........ _....... ............ ........................ .................. ............. ._....... _....... ..... _..... .._.... ..»............... .......... _.............. ..._......
_
Latitude r--�0 6 46 Longitude • 4 66
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J2
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z�0�
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes ZTNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97

� Div Sion of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
vision of Water Quality
W.Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection A Follow-up of DSWC review O Other 1
Date of Inspection l7/ & n I
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered Certified ® Applied for Permit ® Permitted [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. . ........................ ... ......... I ....M 2 County ...
.................................................................... ...�...`....................................
Owner Name: _
.....11(..s.. �............................ f=... C 4�Y.�.Q......... �. ��' s ................. Phone No: S Z% S G L
.............................................................................
Facility Contact:... 01'+.6,.'..,.... �wse� Title: Phone No:
...................................................
MailingAddress: (.9. 6 . 1` (4"7 l• W . ....... ..........y..........................................17.................................................................................................
. ..��4r:.......................................`....Onsite Representative: ...r4.............. Integrator: . ............................................�
Certified Operator_.::�f.........(�,! e 5............................................................... Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
..
Latitude • 1 " Longitude • 4 "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge, is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ,1a<0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes t� ""
❑ Yes No
ElYes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ZN
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ' No

Facility Number: q L r
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Arl.^. y.*rz`'........ ......q....[....ut ......................./...........1...................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ....... 7..�� fi 6 tQ .................................................................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes Ja "o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Q
15. Crop type..........................................................................................................................................
�.....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes J2
o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/ins ction with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
P Pe P
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
0, Nvo.violatioils-o' dericiencies. were noted -during this.visit.- .You:will- recei've-no-furtlier, :.
:. , correspQudekO about this'.visit., " ; ,
f Ar&e- tnrzra -s, zv-� n� vKe H?1- endw"j �ius�G- !-1v(ens -f-4.4-
�wI d �;fS , 17 +1 y��, p , /� �,>�9G( 1e�f� r Z�rs r �s
I w-r�L 1 /
Cit�lv�^". fs (1ti Jfir 719H[ tvp vfie— �'1. D j s n?
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: //-�lt/l— Date: 7//G / IP

North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction Enterprises - Caledonia Farms
P. O. Box 29540
20 19 1) 6
Chapanoke Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0540
Jr.,Governor L.M. (Les) Martin
James B. Hunt Franklin Freeman, Secretary
Enterprise Director
To: Steve Tedder
Division of Environmental Management
From: Johnny Hassell BAR ? 5 �9g6 ' L
Farm Operations Manager L(`,% J
UCE,NF' RALEIGH _._.J
Date: March 18, 1996 REGIONA`OFFICE
Re: Application of Poultry Litter
Per our conversation of March 18, 1996, I will be applying
poultry litter on the Od.om_F-ar.m n_Northampt6n County. It will be
applied at agronomic rates to the land that will support a cotton
crop, as well as some land that we are growing daylilies on for the
Department of Transportation.
Care will also be taken so not to apply this litter too close
to waterways and or streams. This litter will be applied and
incorporated into the soil as part of regular agricultural
practices which take place at this farm. Thank you for your
guidance where this matter is concerned.
cc: Les Martin
Richard Payne
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm
�0 CARO, p
C
nq `yb
��ec',�ON EtalE��a
From —NC Correction Enterprises Administration 0197163974 T-494 P.001/014 F-052
facsimile Cover Sheet
North Carolina Correction Enterprises
2020 Yonkers Road * P. 0. Box 29540
Raleigh, NC 27626-0540
1-800-241-0124
TO: .sue. From: ---
Compony: �lrC�ti'i� Phone: [phone]
Phone: ' ��� �� Admin. Fax: [phone]
Fax: S 7 (-- 47(2 L S - Date:--'
Pages (including cover page) -
0 Prepare reply for my signature
❑ For your approval
❑ Signature
Comments:
❑ Per our conversation
Q For your comments
J For distribution
❑ Per your request
For your information

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 7-484 P.0021014 F-052
O� Wu
. STAT{ w4iA
North Carolina Department of Correction
Correction ]Enterprises
202C Yonkers Road • 4240 MSC • Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.42g0
James Godwin
Michael F. Easley Enterprise Director
Governor
April 24, 2002
Mr. ). D. );fester
NCDENR
Theodis Beck
Secretary
Raleigh, North Carolina
SUBJECT: Fertilizer Release at the North Carolina Correction Enterprise Catedonia 1~ann, Tillery,
NC.
Dear: Mr. Hester:
f am writing you regarding the fertilizer release at the N.C.C.E. Caledonia Farm located in Tillery, NC
on April 20, 2002, 1 have attached with this letter a. copy of the e-mail forwarded to the by Mr. Phil
Sykes, .N,C.C.E. Fann Manager, ft describes what was done in regards to containment and clean up of
the released fertilizer. Also attached are copies of the Material Safety Data Sheets for the two (2)
chemicals involved, Ammonium Phosphate Sol4lion and Ammonium Thiosulfate Solution.
I hope this information finds itself beneficial in regards to the fertilizer release and the action taken. If
you have any questions concerning this incident, please do not hesitate to call me at. [phone].
Sincer ,
Doug Gaylor , MS, C1
Safety Co ultant
Correction Enterprises
djg/Irttcrs2002/faim.doc
cc: Plant File
wwwdoc.sratt!.nc,us/uprise 919-716-3600
gtCORRECTION
NTERPR15E5
Fax [phone] Courier �F 53.71-00

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 919N 63974 T-464 P.003/014 F-052
From;
To;
Date;
Subject,
Phillip Sykes
Douglas Gaylord
4/22/02 9:51 AM
Fertilizer Leak 8-0-24-1 S
On 04-20-02 (Saturday) I received a called concerning a tank leaking at the fertilizer storage area. Upon
arrival at this location a tank was leaking from a small hole about two thirds from the top of the tank. I
immediately contained the leak by placing a pipe over the hole with one end and placed the other end in a
tank in order to capture it. Approxiamtely 500 gallons (only a guess) had leaked out of the tank. The
fertilizer had leaked out onto the ground and eventually into a near by ditch. The ditch was completely dry
( no standing water) therefore we contained the runoff by filling both ends of the ditch with sand. After
containment was complete, we began to cover the remaining fertilizer on the ground with sand. This was
an adsorbent measure. Their was no danger of the fertilizer entering the river or a water source at any
time.
On Sunday, 4-21-02 we removed the sand containing the fertilizer and land applied it in near by fields.
This was done rather than stockpiling it in one central location and the possibility of run off in case it
rained.
To prevent this tank from leaking again, we will maintain the level of fertilizer well below this hole. I
believe the tank wall too thick for repair. These tanks are 17 years old. Any questions, please call.
THANKS PHIL
CC: Jim Godwin

Apr-24-2002 02;43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 0197163974
WESTERN
SERVICE
P.O, x
1168
3705 W. Boa
wood Avenue
Fresno, 'Cakli o
is 913715
(209) 4 6
450
MATERIAL SAFETY
DATA SHEET
SSCTTON T. PRODUCT IDFNTI-FICATION
PRODUCT NAME 10-34-0 (white or green)
4-24-0
11-37-0
Chemical Name Ammonium phosphate saluca,on
Gammdn Name, s'ynonyma
composition
CHEM1'CAT, NAME ... CAS 0
Monnammpnium phosphate
7722-76-1
Dia=oni= phosphate
7783-28-0
Ammon,;i= polyphosphate
68333-19-9%
Water
7732-18-5
cERcLA RATINGS (SCALE 0-3);
HF� TEi = 1 FIRE = 0
RgACTIVITY - 0
SECTION II. PHYSICAL DATA
T-484 P 0041014 F-052
YC✓
RTMCO
Not li5teO
TB9375000
Not listed
SC0110000
PERSISTENCE = Q
Boiling Point Losea water at 2120F (1001,C)
Mk1ti,ng point Not applicable
vapor Pre5aure Not known
Vapor Density Not known
Percent Volatile (by Volume) Not applicable
Evaporation Kato Nor )mown
10-34-0
8-24-0
11-37-0
Solubij,ity in Water
Complato
Complete
Complete
pu
6.65
6.71
5,97
Salt -out- Temperature
1QF
21QF
<320F
specific Gravity (H2O^1)
1.'405 1 68�'F
1.308 0 68QF 1,427 D 68PF
1Lppeazanco and odor
White to green or black
liquid_ Odorless
Page 1 of 6

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 019T163974 T-484 P-005/014 F-052
8-29-0
PRODUCT: 11-37-0
SECTION Ill. PHY51CAL HAZARDS
FIRS �.No EXPLOSION DATA
FlashpoanC Not flammable
Flammable Limits Not fla=able
j3a=nia can be a product of combustion. Flamalyle limits of ammonia
gas in air (by volume) are hoover 16%, Upper 25P
Autoignition Temperature Npe applicable
Extinguishing Media Water
Special. Firefighting Procedures Aumtonium phosphate solutions will nor
burn. Firefighting preeauti=5 are based on escaping ammonia gases.
Wear full protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus.
Apply wAtex spray to knock down and absorb ammonia vapors, Keep all,
personnel upwind of fire. control runoff waters.
Unusual. Fire and Explo9iaF% hazards At, high temperatures, ammonium
phosphates may release
gaseous ammonia, fluorides, nitrogen
oxides, phosphorus oxides.
NFPA RATING (SCALE 0-9); NeMe established
REACTIVITY DATA
stablit,y stable
Hazardous Polymerization None known to occur
lneompatibility None found
Hazardous Decomposition Products At high temperatures may release gaseous
ammonia, fluorides, nitrogen oxides,
phosphorus oxides
CondaCi0ns to Avoid Temperatures above 200OF (930c)
SRCTTt?N TV. HRALTH HAZARPP
PRIM"Y ROUTE (3 ) GP ENTRY
Skin ox tye contact is the most likely exposure. Ingestion is posaibl+e.
inhalation of ammonium phosphate solution is unlikely unless unusual
conditions of use result in aerosol, production.
Rage 2 of 6

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-484 P.0061014 F-052
8-24-0
PRODUCT: 11-37-0
TARGF,T ORGANS None )Frown
HEALTH EFFECTS
Eyes May cause izKitazion Lo eyes
Skin Normally no izritati,on to skin
Inhalation May cause irritation to mucous membranes,
coughing or difficulty in breathing
Ingestion Large doses of ammonium phosphate may cause
nausea, vomiting, and stomach pain
EXPOSURE LIMITS No exposure limits have been set for auuwnium
phosphate svluLions
Product of decomposition or combustion are toxic ammonia, fluorides,
na,trogen oxides, Arid phosphorus oxides.
Ammonia Threshold limit vague (TLV) - 25 ppm
CAs# 7664-41-7 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists)
LCLo - 2000 ppm/4 hours (rats)
Fluoxa,des, as F TLV = 2.5 mg/gO (AGGIH)
Nitxpgen UioXide TLv = 3 ppm (AGGIH)
Cep 101v2-44-0
Phosphorus Oxides T'�V not listed
SYMPTOMS Of OVEREXP0SURE
Acute See health effects above
chronic None found
NOTES TO PHYSICIAN In a fire various gases can be released.
Short-term exposure to smoke, fumes, and
gases can lead to irreversible lung in7uzy
without early eigna anti symptoms.
PagR 3 of 6

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-484 P.0071014 F-052
9-24-0
PRODUCT: 11-37-0
POTENTIAL CARCINOGEN DATA (IARC, DITP, OSHA)
Hnne found for ammonium phosphate Solutions
FOR HZAI.TH EmRcF4NCZES CALL YOUR LOCAL POT50N CENTER
SECTION V. FVAST AID PROCEDURES
Eyes Plush thoroughly for 15 minutes with large
amounts of clean water, occasionally
lifting upper and lower lids. Seek
medical attention if irritation persiats-
skin
Wash thoroughly with soap and water.
Remove contaminatdd clothing, wash or
clean before Wearing again.
Inhalation Remove to fresh aix, if breathing has
stopped, start artificial respiration,
Seek medical attention if discomfort
persists.
Ingestion if person is conscious, give a large
auwurit of water to drink, and make person
vomit. Seek medical attention. On nor
force an unconscious person to drink er
vNni.t .
SECTION VI. SAFE HANDLING AND USE
Hygienic Practices - It i9 advisable to wash promptly if skin becomes
conraminatad, before eating or smoking, before using toilet facilities, and
at the end of the work shift before leaving worksite.
Page q or 6

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-484 P.008/014 F-052
PRODUCT; 11-31-0
SECTION VIT. PMONAL PROTECTION
Ventilation None required under normal concarj ores.
Appropriate goggles should he used whexe
splashing ►nay 4Cgvr and when tzan5ferring
liquid fertilizer.
Skin Wear rubber gloves for transfer operations
or whera splashing may occur. If
irritation occurs, impervious clothing and
gloves should be worn.
Respiratory
None required under normal conditions.
SECTION VIII. TRANSPORATION REQUIREMENTS
POT Proper Shipping Name; Not applicable
DOT KazaTd Class: This solution not regulated by DOT
Label/Placard Required: None
1IN/NA No. Not listed
FOR TRANSPORATION ZMRGMT95 CbLL CHNMTRZC 1-800-424-9300
SECTION IX. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Procedures for Cleanup of Spills and Leaks
,Ammonium phosphate solutions are plant foods. ftowever, large spills
could possibly kill vegetation or cause illness in ani;nta0s.
Contamination of waterways could possibly cause fishkills. Prevent
large quantities from contacting vagatati.on or waterways. Keep animals
away fzvm large spills. Dike spill area if possible To prevent spra4a.
Reportable Quantity (CERCIA) None Established
ISARA Title III) None Established
Page 5 of 6

Apr-24-2002 02:43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-494 P.0091014
PRODUCT: 11 •- 3 7 - n
F-052
WA5TR DISPOSAL METHOD:
if uncontaMn nated, recover and reuse as product, if contamn nated with
other materials, tha nAture and extent of contamination rAy zequxX'® US$
of specialized disposal methods. Consult local, state, or federal
regulatory agenci®a for acceptable Uspo3al procedures and disposal
loc:atiolkm .
F➢A NATTANAI, RESPOWSE CENTER 1-800-424-8802
SECTION X, PRCPARATION DATA
DATE PREPARED; December 20, 1990
NW OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY:
NATTCF.
Robert F. Enos
Western Farm Service, Inc.
P.O. sox 1168
Fresno, California 93715
[phone]
[phone]
All infp,rmation appearing in this document i9 based on data provided by
third party sources and is coiled to comply with the Federal Hazard
communication standard and the California HazardouII Substance9 Information
and Training Act. The information is believed t0 be accurate as of the
preparation date but is not warranted as being the final authority in the
use of this product. This information does not purport to be legal or
medical, advice.
Western Farm Service, Inc., n%akes no Warranty of merchantability, fitnes*
for any purpose or otherwise, express or implied, concerning this product
or its uses Which extend beyond the use of the pxodtArt under normal
conditions in accord with the statezents made on the label.
Page 6 of 6
Copyright CDXS, Inc. 1994

Apr-24-2002 02;43pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-484 P.0101014 F-052
J. R. Simplot company
.,MCC, Group
Trade Name:nonium Thiosulate'Solution M1113U
Registzation No.
rccccc-.�==mrraccccc.��=�nr®cc=�—===aarorcc=ccccco��=====merrrcccccccc===
SECTION I CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION
Manufactures' or FOMUlator: J,R. Simplot COZpany
P.O. Roc 912
Pocatello, ID 83204
Emergency Phone - Chamtrec: 1-000-424-9300
kroduct Name: ,Aauaonium Thiosulfate solution
Comon Name: 15-0-0-20
Chemical Type: Fertilizer
.r�=ooarrm=cc��.�===mrrrrmcccz,,,.—====o�rr®occcccc=c�=�==_=====m�.rrrrc mccccc
SECTION 2 COMPOSITION INFOAM'ATION
chemical, Name C.A.S. No- Chemical WTI, TLv PEL
and synonyms Formula
Hazardoua
Ammonium Nitrate 6494-52-2 NH4NO3 8-10 Not Not
listed listed
- Non-I�axardous
Ammonium Thiosulfare 7783-18-e (NM4)25,03 balance
snlUri c,n
Urea
57-13-6 CO(Nxz)2 6-9
2 ppm SO`
and 25 ppm
HN3 35 ppm
STEL NH.,
10 MOM, Not
listed
NOTE; Ure4 Ammonium Nitrate is added to the Ammonium Th.ioaulfate solution
(12-0-0-26) to
keep the p.roduct"fzom C,;ystalli2itxg in cold
temperatures,
q�====a®rrrccccccccc.,=======mmmrrrsocccccccc=—Rq=====___=====Camrrrrrrmco
SECTION 3
HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
aWRmArr®cc=cs=cT======mmrrrrrrrrmcccc=cc
.ingestion:
oral toXicity'due' to the Aapwnium Nitrate solution is
listed as slight to moderate. No oral toXiCc t y listed
fez Ammonium Thiosulfate. Thiopul,fare salts are
essentially non -toxic. Sulfite sai,ts are slight to
moderately toxic and are used as a Food preservative.
Small repeated doses by =uth can cause headaches and
mental tMpaiMent. Large Amounts taken by mouth may
have serious effects from ammonia and n)-trate salts.
Ten ppm of nitrate ion"is Considered a safe upper
limit.
Inhalation:
Not considered a problem by Inhalation. No t.nxiCity
listed,
Eye Contact:
May cause discomfort to ayes.
skin Absoxpcion:
No dermal toxicity listed.
Skin Contact:
May Cause aggravation to Skin With prolgnged contact_
Effects of ovexdose;
Ingestion cf.extremely large amounts may cause
gastrointestinal discomfort and salivation, nausea,
vomiting, diarrhea, May cause aggravation of skin and
eyes.

Apr-24-2002 02:44pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-484 P.011/014 F-052
Registration No: None
=e===m=�� ______=====m=mr®mmrwmmpwwam�vwmwwwawmawea�me�rsw wwwmmwA m�mgaw�wwa� ewes
SECTION 4 FIRST AID MEASURES
------------------
ingestion: Give 2-3 glasses of water. induce vomiting and call a
doctor.
Tnhalation; Remova person to fresh air and, if necessary, support
.respiration and call a doctor.
Eyes: Flush eyes with fresh running water for 15 minutes.
If discomfort persists, call a doctor.
Skin; Wash skin with mild soap and water. If discomfort
persists, call a doctor.
®m�remmmmmmmmoccc=�cccccccc �cc.:=�.==ccc=cccccc�ccccccc�cmmmrrmmmrmr�e as®®m
SECTION 5 FIRE FTGHTTNG MEASURES
---- ----------------------------
E,xtinguishing Media: Use media suitable to extinguish
source of fire.
Special Fire Fighting procedures: Applicable only when liquid goes to
Oryness. Approach fire upwind• wear
self-contained breathing apparatus anti
protective clorhing. Flood fire with
straight stream o,£ watar. in advanced
stages of fire, use unmanned hose
nozzles at remote locations.
Unusual fire and Explosion hazards: Acaaonium Thiosul£ate is a moderate
reducing agent, xixtures with uran oz
Ammonium Nitrate solutions should not
be allowed to dry. Dry mixtuxes of
these components, or other o4idizers,
constitute a potential fire of
explosion hazard.
SECTION 6 ACCIDRNTAI+ RELEASE MEASURES
WAXf7-;4------Z------�•----cT==�,. �,m.r.��,m=�.�.,»� _-------_._-----c»mmmaiam rm®m nm=C
Environmental Precautions: Keep out of waterways and all bodies of watez.
Fertilizers may promote eutrophicetion in
waterways. Do not contaminate drinking water.
Steps to be taken in case material is released ox spill,ed:
Shut off source of leak or spill. Avoid contact
with strong acids. Reclaim if possible. Absorb
with sand or kitty litter. Keep public away and
advise local agencies if substance has entered
a water course or sewer, Could be used as a
fertilizer using good agronomic practices.
m �1"^"a m mmrmmmmmm mmm a mmmrrmrrmaerelrwmmc-�—e=======���q�,gp,�ca�e7c®CG=mmr mrm rm
SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE
e mmOme®mom®emaemyemrmmeeomommmmrmmmmmmumwwaaw=maammm�sa�z+�ema �,�=acccccc==e®®o
Pzeeautian5 to be taken in handling and storing:
Do not heat over 190QF (89°C) as it tends to
decomposes. Do not contact with brags or copper
materials. Store away from high heat ,sources or
etrong acids. Storage temperatures should be
between 300F ('J°C) and 10008' (38-c) to keep
solution liquid and pumpable• Avoid contact with
skin and eyes. Do not m1x or apply with

Apr-24-2002
02;44pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163074 T-494 P.0121014 F-052
- - ..... . , .111... I.... .,.. ,
Registration No: Nye
c=vccgTP==crosogccgqMfkScqT===am�snmmecccecccccc=qq-pgmapmroQemaao�ceecccc=cc
anhydrous ammnoni.a, phosphaT3 c acid, or any other
strong acid. Mild steel storage is adequate.
Storm blends of aquaa amonia plus ammonium
ttaiosulf'ate ,in lined, coated or icainlesr
equipment. Do not install immersipn heaters rn
storm" tanks. DO NOT ALLOW TO DRY.
Conditions of Reactivity: Heat and fire. con react with terrain reducing
agents under heat conditions. ,Acids decompose
ammonium nitrate at any temperature.
=ccc c=�,�===m®�m¢eeccee.aa,rw•-••w--MR•eeasa�iemomo=ocev== �ceeeo=ec==,.����„��_______
SECTION 8 EXPOSUP.E CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
c ccc==r,=�.�==9ms�®mccc=cccr,�r��====Ro�Pgyry n,�wM�tOieatCl�cE►�cSccccc==:.cc.:=�.-.�!-T��
ventilation Protection: No local exhaust is naedod. Natuxal ventilation
sufficient under normal conditions,
Respiratory Protection; None usually required. If needed, respirator
3uitabl,Q, for ammonia or sulfur dioxide.
PratectivQ clothing: Chemicsi clothing if necessary to avoid skin
contact.
tyc PrULULC�QXJ; Chemical splash -proof goggles.
Other: Eyewash fountain and/or safety shower in area £or
washing akin and eyos.
T�"r,===oe=ei���®,aeaFe�=FRw'F �nwereq=�cem,rsa�so�ar�o=ecceccccccc c===.ar,-�� � ______
sEc l-JUN 9 PHYSICAL AND CMMICAL PROPERTIES
Boiling Point: 2120F (100,C)
Freezing Point; -31°F (-350C)
specific Gravity: 1.325 at 60OF (15.60C)
Flashpoinr: Non-flammable
Appearance: Clear white solution with slight ammonia odor.
Fxtingui5hing Media: use media suitable for extinguishing source of
giro.
Solubility in Water: Complete
vapor Pressure, mm Hq: Not applicable
Reactian with Water: Not listed
pH: 7.0 7..5_.(l0� aqueous solution)
-00 �FF+4c
SECTION 10 9TARZLITX AND REACTIVITY
-----------=caaer�ns®®se c cccriOlMF�t{e1F��mcccccc=-cccco==eeccaom--eymm,ea rorr� �e �mi
Stability (Normal Conditions): stable
Conditions to Avo�d; Unstable above 302vF (15011C). Avoid
Incompatibility (Material to Avoid):
llazardous Dccompgsi.tion Products;
Hagardous Polymerization:
fire conditions.
Dry Amnoniuii Nitrate or oxs djze,rs.
Anhydraue Ammonia, strong acids, or
acid solutions above pH B.S. Zinc
Sulfate, Ammonium Polysulfide
solution.
In combination with ammonia, it wall
precipitate, and rolease heat. In
combination with acids, it
precipitates sulfur and liberates
Sulfur Dioxide gas. $egins ro
decompose over 190OF (88^C)
Will not occur,

Apr-24-2002 02:44pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 9197163974 T-464 P.013/0)4 F-052
Trade )lame! Ammoni= ThiFSa'ti Uate 's41.ut;Lon .-
Registration No: Norte
cr,.:..�==ems®r►����c.�,=-moearooeeac+P�c �.=c=�mmsrrruv®������3P �.r�--=Wm�rrr®�JiA c��e
conditions to Avoid: Do not mix with anhydrous ammonia,
phoaphoxie acid, other strong acids
or zinc sulfAte.
,.. �. r,===snre•+rr ccc=c r.� -"Om nrrr====aW=T _=•^==neeo®rarr rafi�eeeccc=NFa�.�. =��=�P===�=_
s�cTloN 17 TOXICOLOGY WORMATION
Aquatic ToXicity Rating: TLza 96; 100o - 1.00 ppm. Low toxicicy to aquatic
life,
ea r r a ====V RX=p====OrrMaac�cc�cc�=��s>F�ses®rsmdlP�P���o=c�MP wi'.T ��======-cc===-
sRCTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
fee=Prre==acc�,��.�===ear rat ClQFocecc=qr,�=gyp=
None listed.
=mm==-=m 0rm®®cscWG7e=cccc
5ECTi0N 13 DISPOSAL CONSaDERATIoNS
wasteAisposal Procedures: Reclaim if possible. Disposal Should follow
federal, state and local xequlata.ons. could be
used as a fertilizer using good agronomic
prdctices.
0==saWDZZ.= bssrsr®dYPGNPr=.-..,-,=q=;==M===
SECTION li TRANSPORT INFORMATION)
Shipping name: Nor regulated by DO'S
Hazard C1aod: None C,A,S. Number: See "Ingredients"
Reportable Quantity (Rp); None A.G.T. Number: Nona
Labels Required: Nonce Haz waste No: None
placard: None EPA Regist Np. Norte
SECTION 15 REGULATORY INFORMATION
rKrfa� cccc=cccT=====omrrrrrcmc�3�aRtF=��====T=====___=====omcarwOeAraYrrrrores
Carcinogenicl6y:
by IARr-?: Yes { ) No (X) by NTP?: Yes { ) No (X)
Not on the SARA 302 list of reportable quantities,
SECTION 16 OTHAR INFORMATION
Flash Point (Teat Method): Not applicable Fla=Anable Limit$ LovER UPPER
Autoigt:a�On Temperature: Not applicable (% 9Y 'VOLUME) N/A N/A
NFPA Hazard Ratinq: Health: 1 Fire: 0 Reactivity: 0
Specific: Not applicable
This NFPA t4 ting is a recommendation by the manufacturer us3.nq the
guidelines or published evaluations prepared by zhe National. Fire
aroreceion Association 1NFaA,).
Msps varsion Nwnber-: 3 (revisions to Section 15)

Apr-24-2002 02:44pm From -NC Correction Enterprises Administration 91971639T4 T-484 P.0141014 F-052
Registration No: None
• �-c�����K-....,.,�y1G �--o�aodmmev�e,e�uastllas���/SO���wwa��a®ells ms�mi����r��rurmm.a�-moo
Disclaimer: This information relates Lo the specific material dess,gnated
and may not be valid for such 'material, used in combination with any other
materials or in any process. Such information is to the best: of our
knowledge and belief, accurate and reliable as of the date compiled.
However, no rep,resex%tat:iop, warranty or guarantee is made as to its
accuracy, reliability of completeness. No WARRANTY OF MRRC1TAWA,51LTTY,
MX&55 FOR ANY PARTICUIJkR PURPOSE, OR ANY OTHER WARRANTY, $XPR$Ss OR
TMPLZED, is MAY3Z CONCERNING THE INFORMATION HEREIN PROVID4D. It is tha
user's responsibility to satisfy himself as to the suitability and
completeness of such information ,for h.is own particular use. we do not
accept liabi3i,ty for any loss or damage that may occur from the us6 of
this lnfomation nor do we offer warranty against patent infringement.
Reviewed by: The Aepartmen% of Regulatory Affairs
May 1999 [phone]
Copyright CDMs, Inc. 1994-1999