390006_PERMIT FILE_20171231

I`
1
i
o Traverse Point
See Detail
this sheet
pRiSMOI DAL lETR
c IGI"L SURFACE or�ptr,u! Around
CE
8in Sch. 40 PVC pipe or Equal! � � 'TM FACTOR RN X SW1W
320' Required CHP VOLUME FACTOR l8 X SVELL
RAV CUT VOLUME 2I22.06 CY
q� ClR v0.uME i903.75 cY
RAV FILL VOLUME 57W3 CY
a4P FILL VOLUME 60714 CY
i
Barn -to be guttered
Temp. Benchma
El, 100.0
/Cr,
ch 40 PVC pipe or Equal-
120' Required
2' x 2' x 2' Concrete Junction Box box
Stacking area provides 60 days storage for solid waste
and bedding material.
T-he bottom of the stacking area Is to be provided with a
4' concrete pad graded and poured to drain to elevation
85.5 In the soutrjeast corner (location of pipe Inlet). The
concrete pad Is to be 3000 tb, concrete with expansion
,Joints at a maximum spacing of 30 feet.
Solids separator for pipe Intet shall
be constructed as follows,
Construct a frame Oft wide x 3ft
high from 2' x 4' 's.
Inside the frame attach 2' x 4' 's
spaced with 2.5' openings between
them as shown.
Attached the frame to the 4' x 4'
posts and cap with a 2' x 4' Front View
attached to the frame and the Scale V = 10'
posts.
-2'x2'x i
To of box
Use ex
0
Top View
❑o
WASTE STORAGE POND
Top of Dam
Elevation 86.0
Width 12 feet
Bottom
Elevation 74.0
Dimensions 59ft X 28ft
Side Slopes
Inside 2,1
Outside 3d
Emergency Spillway
Elevation 84.80
Bottom Width 12ft o
Side Slopes 311 u-)
Maximum Liquid Elevation 83.4
(2.6ft. below settled top)
Storage Capacity 180 days (251,620 gal)
o O0
—New Fence 1111I I 11
0
in
Q1
d
U
Cli\ 0
0
In
Separator for parlor
water and lot runoff
pipe Is to be a 4'
concrete slab with 8'
wide concrete curb
walls. Dimensions of
overall separator will be
8ft wide with a 4ft long
2ft 2ft deep flat section
deep Slope 811 and then slope on an 84
flat 12 ft long pad for 12ft to existing
area ground) therefore the
overall dimension is 8ft
Scale 1' = 5' x 16ft. The concrete
pad Is to be 30001b
Opening 2ft wide by concrete.
0.5ft deep to The separator can be
overflow Into 21x2'x2'rotated/adjusted as
box w/ 8' outlet pipe needed.
to waste storage
pond.
M

w . . •
IType of Visit /0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation j
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access I
Facility Number Date of Visit:
O Permitted rtified [3Co ditio ally Certified [3Registered
Farm Name: n'�/� aL iL 0'h(
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
me: �de
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _
County: `9r"s vl L
Phone No. -
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm -
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry OCattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 0` 0 °° Longitude 0' 06 0 a
Design Current
Swine Ca aci P.o ulation
Design , Current Design Current
P,oultr Ca aci Population Catt[ Ce aci P,o ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
Dai
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non-Dai
: arm
❑Other
•Total Design Capacity
total SSLW
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts;
❑ Boars
Number of Laggons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps /ElD No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: v�
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes ]�No
❑ Yes An
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 116
❑ Yes No
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes No
Structure b
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 21— Date of Inspection �.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes ,,1Yo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or /
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes a
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑YesNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes gfNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0140
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ZNo
12. Crop type s; 6m , SM rr I ksGwr'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes �f No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes tj No
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
19, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / _ S{. �i ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irriigation, freeboard, w t���alysis & sail sa pie��orts) ❑Yes No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in `3 �ec't affhe time odesign? El Yes �No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes )2rN o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ;o
l/—No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes JJ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 'PrNo
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Com"meiits< r`efer.to uestion # Ex lain an YES answers an' i/or�an �reca "mendatians a an 'ok "'
( q ) A Y Y y comments' t ,
ilsc drawings of facility to better explain situation s:t(usegadditional pages as necessary),,Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Z17-.- W�'�
AA*44 Attwd- (M- CK /A W'%R- 'I A4,k&
Reviewer/inspector Name
I - f ` C� , ; �?J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Z
pi
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 11— D Date of inspection 0:4v�
Odor Lam
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pennanentltemporary cover?
Additional Comments'°and/or Drawings:' m
❑ Yes <o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes IV
❑ Yes X51NO
05103101

�. t #Iti€ 1.E3:°.rElEt jE� ad s+ ,g-iP ¢ 11 rt,j t E3 r rr a sr- E k t ;j i t 'U Eft E''EE-fi
r �rl Er{ct Ere 3g r _t.#d t s 3k r �� ivision of Water.Qllality ¢ rI Cs "'P ry't Pi r,r 3, fS 9¢r¢ r r, t s El ffri
iR'r'i f e c O Division of Soil`and Water Conservation r'
I' r 3'
Er a I r t o C .Other Agency fa a o,r ¢ tErE tt r r #FAE„
i f - tit
r.:
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 04outine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I)atc (if Visit.: A� f Time: : i�D M Printed nn: 10/26/2000
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ` .. �............" ""�....' � r (.T............................................ County:.... y(4..................................................................
f !
Owner Name:.... C C. Q. #I �6,1 Phone No:....��j.q.J.L�L�.��Q ��...................................
..............................................................................................
FacilityContact:............................................................................-.... I itle:...................... .......................................... Phone No: ..................................................
Mailing Address: �!.� -.W-. , k6 Cykud WI 6vc Z-7,527......................................................................... ..........................
................................................... .....
Onsite Representative:......................................................... ..... Integrator
f.
Certified Operator:.... .! (.,�J ; !`!!�tGa`���, Operator Certification Number:.....! �.�.J. ................
........................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry attle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �' �•� Longitude
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cat9p Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer I JEJ-Dairyfir I
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Nun -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impartti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance: man-made'?
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is ohserved, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain''
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:..... �o s�............... ...................................... .......... I..................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes N Nc
❑ Yes J o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes No
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure; b
Continued on back

F'atility Number:3 —6 1 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ;3'No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ❑'�To
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an . f
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? /Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;31fqo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ["No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Ef'No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes XNO
12. Crop type CA.) '5hi e. 1u � L
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 2fN0 .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �o
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;Z(No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal W to ana$ meat Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 0 a t+��6rof /o I ❑ Yes NNNoo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, was a alysis & soil sample reports) Yes o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effe�iat the time of design? ❑ Yes T/'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes � No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes JQ40
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 9fNo
0'.1Q yiQi�ii¢>�js;ojr dfcencie rv$rens'v�s�t; Yoty� u;titr• .Af
corres o deice: albaut; this visit.' N � !
Comments refer'tb uestion`# E latn:an YE '' ` ` < 'W , i"
' �lr °' l _ " 3 S answers and/or as recommendattoas'oc an other comments zr r� t
€ h 'an ¢iis�E. Ct €, ¢ ti= 'q f - yn :r, €yC- r Fr € € .L•x : P I 1 sr do y
Use drawings of facility to better a phd situations (use addid6aw'pages as necessary).
A.
-7) °°ti i,l(s 4 A aA.44
411)tom,-
J q n G�,e,) z T
Reviewer/Inspector N• '/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: a� i / Sapp

1
'Facility Number: 770— b Date of .Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ETNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ,lrNNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes � No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 12 0
ona nmments an or rawwings• F
a �t a.t. 3... ... 1 i. 4 1 I.J.N '(
1
r
Uu IT IN,
�I Z. c 5 Wes
IC
ALI
5100

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: WO6292 W
Grower: Macialek, Harry J. Copies To: County Extension Director
2118 Hwy 96 USDA-NRCS-Granville
2127101
Creedmoor, NC 27522
WaslteAnaiysisRehort farm:
Granville County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results artsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca Mg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
Mo CI C
1
Waste Code:
ALD
Description:
Dai Lagoon Liquid
Total 113
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
53.1 596 143 66.0
28.2 12.0 1.14 0.66
0.28 0.42
Na Ni Cd Pb At Se Li pH SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE K al
263 7.16
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 allons
other Elements
Ibs/7000 gallons
Application Method
Broadcast
N P205 K20
0.41 0.71 4.8
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
0.83 0.39 0.16 0.01 0.01
Zn CU B Mo CI
T T T
Na Ni
2.2
Cd Pb At Se Li
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results artsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca mg
S Fe
Mn Zn
Cu B
Mo CI C
2
Waste Code:
SSD
Description:
Dairy Surface Scraped
Total 25429
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR N
Urea
8682 11758 15832 6286
3444 1846
273 219
86.3 20.0
Na Ni Cd Pb At Se Li N SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE tons
3245
29.29
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/ton
wet basis
Other Elements
Ibs/ton wet basis
Application Method
Broadcast
N P205 K20
6.1 7.0 6.6
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
5.6 2.2 1.2 0.65 0.10
Zn Cu B
0.08 0.03 0.01
Mo Cl
Na Ni
1.9
Cd Pb At Se Li
1
ccw�S
IEO
I-1- f.? =I
-Pip" WoAte

WNY'isjon of Water Quality..''
Q Division of Soil and Water.Conservation
Q OtherAgency
Type of Visit -O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit XrRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: q 13 'rime: Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number 3
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted /Crcertified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above 'Threshold: .........................
i� A G'ft. � �. k— County. _... ULAN J " LA-E,
Farm Name: ........�,..1.:................ ...................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No: .............................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:.................. Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ,•,xlP!,� •...••_..••.±4•..0 r..•fr.C-..•
Certified Operator: ................................................... ..................
................
Location of Farm:
integrator: .............. . ......................................................................
............... Operator Certification Number: ...... 2. �?.1..
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry k Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 0 C I& Longitude • 6 44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle . Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer airy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer 11 �]
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JEJ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lags.. n Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )ZrNo
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ElYes V N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes dNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
SLrUG(Ure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ................. !n.......... ....................................
............................
Freehoard (inches): Ear_ i "
5/00 g CL o -J
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[ (No
Yes
❑ No
eol's"pillway ❑ Yes 'o
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on bacl ;

acility Number: 39 — j�; j Date of Inspection cl Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observe ? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ONo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes /ff No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [ 'es ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ENo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ET'N o
Waste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes VN o
12. Crop type C..pw/S -G • �ESC.4,F
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? pew Z;Z, lie
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
-)kl8. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Wnagement Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WiP, checklists, design, n)4ps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (icl irriV11on, freeboard, wW'e analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Na•viol"atioris:oi- defid6ndes were noted. during this'viI. sit;-'Y:ou Wii1 receive fid further
correspondence. about this .Visit.
❑ Yes ,No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes jZrNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2�No
❑ Yes ["No
;2Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Z[31No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes P1110
❑ Yes Vo
❑ Yes Z011-1
0
❑ Yes �o
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
2 t� V t A pug W4 M_ou,r, G e ' r A{�t.a�+ uM a P_'o i L r T,, I*i CL 2r1.SS �-Al #
_SsP•`�t wRSt.
�EM1Po>? ( S tS��� t�►>a,� Atr c t.Jt p atz �p��R 4 U
�} CA lF- Lzr% t- 17F 5 f4a lI 1-D 3E,
"Co"0_0 tas AAnnp W__EV ray+ 9AMP1_F_t Jv e�E'iE-s�j'ksrtg '7�L �-``) AJ-A LA8LF_
�, siri t;l» O.1CL ►�r1t_�C4:ii� �F SvuJJ W��'CEJ' `t"o �iC�..p 1'�%r fib i%rt
'ors ZI 0. PJ V��a_ Gat=-+J A.00 , ttl 1�16fj°PiL'r`°
1 5V h. + �FPV_ FErcA`V— 3Pr r , rS ,t
1a< QKoC�s'S tiG tjP0Af,WG_ W-J. PLAN r�.JA L-CO i', Gf�r4n1J�[l,ti SG1GP
Reviewer/Inspector Name a 0'J ,S _ -%�� � _ WO-6 - I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � r__ ,� - [A Date: ^� 113 ;5 cZ 5/Qp

'"'Facility Number: _3q — Date of Inspection OP tSJ printed on: 7/21/2.000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor helow Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [ErNo
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 6Na
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONO
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ElYes 1,2<0
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes Vo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes f' "o
Additional Comments and/or ravings:
Ak
26 ,�o traN G� -QJ� 3y W%r. �:ri QJat,`r�
zbbMO �Z
7
�aD Z Y �9•vS
PI-. O' To Rc V � c� , ff :!
5100
J

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C.W. Allen Jr
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
2118 Hwy 96
Oxford NC 27565
Farm Number: 39 - 6
Dear C.W. Allen Jr:
•WX'A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Harry J. Macialek Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
3�
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
C.W. Allen Jr
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
2118 Hwy 96
Creedmoor NC 27522
Dear C.W. Allen Jr:
NCDENR
NoRTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
rdR fiELEiGN ; �~—
_ UI�rJr;< Of
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility NumbeO926�
'Gran,viile Cou
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRl, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Granville County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number 1 '�" Date of Inspection JZ
F7 y L '��
Time of Inspection Ivn V 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted E3 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not O erational/%�'Date Last Operated:
i Count �Vl,.✓��i
Farm Name:......... 1-'.`.�C..c{411l.k.............................................................. y:.............yis........... .....
OwnerName: 'J phone No... ...................................... ........ Cs. � t! Q.......................r...................................................... ...............................................
Facility Contact: .....'..............�t. k........... Title: ........ Phone No: ....................
........................................................ ...............................
MailingAddress:........ ........ 1!q4.... �.................................................................. .....................N,..L....,............. . WZZ..
�t �+ot I [ ..e
`�.................................................... Integrator:.....................................................................................Onsite Representative:......... ....................
Certified Operator: ..................................... . ............. .11.1 ........................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
....................................................................... ......................................................................................................... ....... ....
Latitude �� �" Longitude 0
S,
Design Current Design Current
wine , e Capacity Population Poultry Ca'nacity Pouulation' :,Cattle
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
❑ Non -Layer .5 ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
r Total Design Capacity
..: TOta1'SSLW
�Number`ofLagoons $ �F ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
[I❑Lagoon Area
3lioldm rPonds / Snhd Traps No Liquid Waste Management System
g
Discharees & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any,part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify
c. li' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Doti discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
,a acity Po ulation
136 I -W
Area
Spray
Yes 631 o
❑ Yes E No
Ej Yes ErNo
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes L°7 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? .+ discharge? Q yes
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other th/ o
Waste Collection & Treatment i
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? �illwa ❑Yes o
g P Y P g q p� Y /Z.,turc 5 Structure 6
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structured
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): S� were erosion,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observe/'age' etc.) ❑ Yes LRNo
3/23199 Continued on back

Facility Number: — is
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes EK
StructurmLagoonsAolding Ponds, Flush_Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
'd... .......... .....-i,........... .......................................................................................................... ....
Freeboard(i' ........... ........................................................................................................................... ........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 63 No
Structure 5 . - Structure 6
............................. .............................
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes t*tvo
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [O/No
Waste_ Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes U' No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type h..t .�D.� r.... 5.:. �^3 f�:.....................r............'.t........�tti...st�.a........... S.,rS:?...L:............... .........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes [] No 4101
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
13-No:violations•ocdeficiencies.were-noted,duringthis: visit.-:You;will recei:ve',n— 6 ftirrheir
eo&690ndeace alioid -this: visit'.• : , ;
❑ Yes 9"'No
❑ Yes L"INo
❑ Yes LTNo
Yes 0 No
❑ Yes B�,o
❑ Yes Ll No
❑ Yes &fNo
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes Rf No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspection d Z
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 94No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ENo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes R(No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes E?40
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [9/No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permarient/temporary cover? [:]Yes No
Additional Comments all Or rAwingS
A6
Y
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Forest Blackwell
Double B Dairy
8114 Dick Blackwell
Oxford NC 27565
Farm Number:139IZ2D
Dear Forest Blackwell:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
September 15, 1999
b
You are hereby notified that Double B Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information Iisted in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this Ietter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Charles
Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 5714700,
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encI.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617.Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 ' Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C. W. Allen, Jr.
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
2118 Highway 96
Creedmoor, N.C. 27522
Dear Mr, Allen:
A14
� •
�0_.
2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 27, 1999
Subject: Farm Certification
Facility Numbtr*3976,
Granv"ill'ekCourity,• ��
The Division of Water Quality has received your Animal Waste Management Plan
Certification Form. Upon reviewing your certification I have noticed that section II. E and III. E
have not been signed by a technical specialist. The Division of Water Quality has requested the
following material from Diana Lewis, of Granville County Soil and Water Conservation District,
to correct the problem. Please contact your Technical Specialist to obtain the necessary
signatures and resubmit the certification form to our office within fourteen (14) days of receipt of
this letter. Until your Technical Specialist has signed these sections your facility is considered
not certified. For your convenience, you may have your Technical Specialist fill out just the
highlighted sections of the attached form and return this with the originally signed certification.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
Attachments
cc: Raleigh Regional Office — Division of Water Quality
Granville County Soil and Water Conservation District
Diana Lewis, Natural Resource Conservation Service — Durham Field Office
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a f; ..;;��Nigi4n'oiSoil and Water`Conservation Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection;
,0 Division 'of Water Quality -Compliance Inspection - e
Other: Agency - Operation Review
Jp Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other l
Date of lnspc:cliou
Facility Number (` _
Tinto of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 13 Certified (7 Conditionally Certified Registered IONot O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ................................................................. .......... .... County: �f�" .:....................................................-
OwnerName:........................................................................................ :................ Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title:.... I'ltone No:
MailingAddress:............................................/.�..]..............................................................................,.,...........................,....,................................ ,.... .
Onsite Representative: r1�.../. .(.... ......... Intel;rator:...............................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:........................ I—,.............
Location of Farm:
A
......................................... .............. ................ ................. ...... ... ................. .......... .. ........................... ...
Latitude .6 Longitude • �°'
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine _ Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I 6Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wcan
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ID Lagoon Arc, ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream ImpacLS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. lI discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. 11' discharge is observed, what is the estinmicd flow in gathnin`'
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`,
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'!
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 SIruCltrre 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes f�No
❑ Yes E/o
❑ Yes /VN0
❑ Yes [,—,,,,No
❑ Yes X No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
.+ If
Freeboard (inches): �t..)....._... .................... ..........
a............................................................................................. ...............................
1 /6/99 Continued on back

' i I ' 1
F ;j ity Number: — Datc of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats w the integrity of', ny of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
❑yes
No
seepage, etc.) .
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
v
closure plan?
❑ Yes
/No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
LZYes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
E200'yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
Yes
liquid level elevation markings'?
❑
efNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
26cs
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
ElYes
FerNo
12. Crop type[�1.4.....`a�,�`..............�j-- ...................................................................................................................................................................
13, Do the receivin crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
�No
rN Pvc&-XS d F oevb - hJtJ�
14. Does the facility lack Sable acrrreOa__�_e)}for
) Ian tpplic lio}nf?? footprint) 1
� �
❑ Yes
RNo
e; e; ,e L Y' �ilt�� 1
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑Yes
No
16, is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
also
Required Records & Document~
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZNo
Iry i � GT C�Ta rlc�
tfi 18. Does e facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ElYes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �ido
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes Mo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ NO
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes 0No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [;�No
0; �.vioalations'or. deficiencies .were noted daring -H is -visit. Y.ou va ... ere.. a niY further . .
eorrespoaiden .. t .. ..this .vis . .... . . ..... ........ .............. . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings 'of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
oo .� A.
f j e � e e � J �& () 5v �L� se c°r jf-gr S �r� l//� �t/�i S IC � Al r ,
Lo
jL, l
�K. ,� � h�ck<,r�rt�ls a,� /ti � S � CZS P/•f1�45 � �3�Ia�t�� _._
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -717 112 11/6/9

1AR 02 '99 02:00PM
P.i
s
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
�iealtl. and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
WATER QU
PHONE: (919) 733
FAX NUMBER:
TELEcOPY To.
FAX N UMBER.
FMb % Expra monk
_.�_ - _.im;v
NCDENR
NORTH CA.RQLiWA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
�Y SECTION
"E GROUP
J093, extension 581
919) 715-5048
FROM: SHANNON LANGLEY a
E
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:T
COMMENTS:
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762E-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax 919-71S-6048
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer; 50% recycle&10% post -consumer paper

MAR 02 '99
02 s OOPM --" '- . —"
P.2
January 21, 1999
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Ref; Special Agreement
Facility Number 09_-6,
Barry J. Macialck
Grraariv I e=Co .
Dear Mr. Howard:
With regard to my phone conversation with Mr. Langley on January
15, 1999 about our special agreement. Wet weather prevented me
from meeting the deadline of December 15, 1998. The deficiencies
are as follows: seeding and mulching around storage structure,
fencing cows'out of area and exten.`'ding palor waste separator.
As of January 18, 1999 the fence wrork and re seeding around the
storage structure has been completed. The straw mulching is 90%
completed. Due to a design flaw Snd contractor error in the pal.or
waste separator, we are awaiting the contractor to correct this
problem. All deficiencies should:be. corrected within two weeks.
The solid waste storage and liqui4 waste pond are complete
and working properly, there is no. -run o££.
Thank you for your understanding ind cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
incerely,
Harry J . 1�/Macialek

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Harry J. Macialek
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
2118 Highway 96
Creedmor, NC 27522
Dear Mr. Macialek:
ffll5WA
4 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 4, 1999 REC 1u
'!'ill 7 1999
t`1t1,irC EViLLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number:
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
Granv lle Cho
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Fayetteville Regional=Office w/attachment
Harnett County Soil and Water Conservation District w/attachment L
Facility File w/attachment d
Central Files w/attachment
Shannon Langley wloriginal attachment IFM i? I'
°DEHNR RALEIGH REONAL OFFICE;
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina-27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
`A COUNTY OF GRANVILLE
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 39-9
HARRY J. MACIALEK
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Harry J. Macialek, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 14313-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H A217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 39-6
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100,00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

i
I
Farm Number: 39-6
Special Agreement )D.22
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Harry J. Macialek's Dairy
&A AV (TI 9221C 9/z
Print Name/of Owner
Signature o er
Date l/ z v / p
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
-A4-'e4e -
Date 12• ZJr•
o/LJChairman of the Commi ion

44
Routine
Follow-lin of DW
i Facility Number I
13 Registered 1 Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
Farm Name:..... .f /r1L.. ....... ............. ( .. ....:.....
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24-hr. (hh:mm)
© Not O eratinnal . Date Last Operated:
County:
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:............................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:... 16ttq........ Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:..............................---------..
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude • C 4 « Longitude ' 4 44
El to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Layer Dairy
❑Non -Layer Non-Dairy.x
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Weansr;:.j
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
�.:�� .
k TOta 0 sign Capacrfy NO
❑ Gilts,zIA
❑ Boars.
',.
Subsurface Drains Present j❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at -the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
(Yes ❑ No
/❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes t6 No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes
UrNo
❑ Yes
e No
❑ Yes
P N0
�es
❑ No
❑ Yes
'9No
❑ Yes
Y No
('n"H"Fleef
nrr hnrkr

Facility
Number-7
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Tits. -etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
1 ' Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):............. ........... ...........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
Struc 6
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ Yes
�No
49 Yes
13.
Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
� Ms
[:]No
Waste Agglicatiort
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
//
❑ Yes
INO
(If in excess of WMP, orrunoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type f?. .N...l... , .1`f(.)?.1.................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do thg rec��g cro sdif� with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
jCM0
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
L.dNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Cl Yes
Co
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
j (No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Z"NNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
E4
For
Certifted or Pernvtted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑, No.vitilations-or deficiencies. were-nated-during this:visit.- You:v'ifY receive•no• liriher
: . corresokideittce. about this: :. .. . : . : .. : .
ij W-A-S r r rr.;pn o iYJ 4;�— d�,`�r,�, S !�c_f , r/'6/1) i� )V D LG UC �E�T
Fri fL S I rbrl. rI a 'Lf N . W I— 1— 6 0 t1tv1((4- C")
54 sar- �r :54FV APE
/Vd � Ns 7`PGz Z2 .
a a G-oa.j.�-c� ,
i. 'yM4,1 /� ti Arn i1 F7-rr7-71-n7-14)1 _ 1=i.1141J_ ,T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /"// jA oyf i 14 /77/�, f1 , Date:

v
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C.W. Allen Jr
2118 Hwy 96
Creedmoor NC, 27522
Dear C.W. Allen Jr:
NCDENR-
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
Facility Number: 39-6
Granville County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on March 12, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with C.W. Allen Jr in
order to allow additional time for C.W. Allen Jr to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter. .
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

0
P
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Y Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
RRO Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA ,w
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF GRANVILLE
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
} FACILITY NUMBER: 39-6
C.W. ALLEN JR
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by C.W. Allen Jr, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",
and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission: -
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A 5
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an -'animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with I5A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997. '
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21. .
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a ,..`
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in .
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to ,
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph l (a) above, ,
hereby agrees to do the following:.
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by October 31, 1998. w 't
"�. ',s�

Farm Number: 39-6
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the'date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties; or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 39-6
Special Agreement
Page 3 .
.7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Harry J. Macialek Dairy
Print Name of Owner
Date.
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

CW" hp]t3
[j Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
[O'Routine O Complaint O Follow-up 6f DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Ins p coon =
Facility Number 3.`l Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
©`Registered 13 Certified 13 Applied for Permit' 0 Permitted 113 No?Opera eratiana] Date Last Operated:'.... .................
Farm Name: u C .0 bA County:......... .......r`.... ......................................•--•....
Owner Name:.......... rr... w.A....................... 4.0R..of.............. Phone No: .
Facility Contact: .....Kdet. y...:.......MA t-4 4...........:.. Tit le: ........�R.tt�!r........................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.........Z.... ..................�.�........ ........r.-!A............... ....... ......��...I"tf,t~!~..............--......................
Onsite-Representative:...,J.q.!!!!!�.C..j'........::... 1t. ... f4............................. Integrator:.........................................................................
Certified Operator;...... 1 JM.A+� ...................... Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
..........:.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.!" . '........gq.....ti............. ?...rs ...................�5..�'"� ��C!{.........C..JC.A�+,..........LMt.1..Gp.( .PS .r ?[sl.... ? ...... ...I.......................
Latitude 0.0` �« Longitude �• ��G°
;Design
Swine ` G'Catiacity F
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow, to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design C6rrent
Poultry Capacity Population Catt
❑ Layer Dair]
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-
_-
❑ Other
z Total Design :Capa+
:, <Tota1SS1
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste Managen
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any" part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field GKOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observcd, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system! (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Capa tc ty Popalahon ``
Area 10 Surav Field Area
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Rmo
RAVes ❑ No
❑ Yes (K,o
ElYes l.!K
&<s
❑ No
GrYes
❑ No
0 Yes
9No
L! Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes RrNo
❑ Yes EeNo
Continued on back

Fddltty Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on -site which need to be property closed'?
Structures (Laioons,11 Idiny fonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure: 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ...................................
................................... . ......
Freeboard(ft):........................................................... .....
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes V'o
❑ Yes fi?�o
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Ycs'u
11. Is erosion, or any usher threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
190170
12. Do an of the structures need maintenance/improvement? rovement'? /
Y P
Yes
l o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level mark - . ?
❑ Yes
Maste Application
��
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
500
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
w
15. Crop type C. f.Al.................:....S.M.a��..... .rw..!..........................................................................................................':..................I..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Managenent Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
R10
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
?4 )t
19. Js there a lack of available waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
[<o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[eyes-.'[]
No
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
F<0
.
22. Does record keeping need improvement? r
❑ Yes
❑ No�^
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit"'-
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this. visit. You will receive no further
correspondence, about this.visit.-
��r for �a sf`t f �iuy i �t
5;1 K of M am,
o.1► a a N
answers and/or'anv recotninendations
`(use additional pates as necessarv)
�b �t tra Sssd w a �+irr wd�/
a e of �;�+ �W&y ���� aYy;Sf :.
7/25/97
:. .,•.;
Reviewer/Inspector Name level, y. �� ,% tta ;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �,,J[,�„ �.�-' y Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
N1 E IM 0 R A N D U M
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
. 4;A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Please fund attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number —3 / 6
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
INKVO4pe"K :3-00
_V.
rkk�5
-
i•�
C. Sr �F 4r�
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5017a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): . C. W. Allen, Jr.
2. Facility No.: 39-6
3. Facility Name: _ Harry J. Macialek Dairy
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
_Harm J._ Macialek
5. Mailing AddreSS:2118 Hwy.
City: Oxford State: NC Zip:_ v55
Telephone No.: ( 919 } 52s-3n7i _
6. County where facility is located: Granville
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): _ Dairy
8. Application Date
3--5-98
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into 'a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal. waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
1-18-96
FORM SPAG V98 Page 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
�°aste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
I have been operating this diary Rince 1983. My farher had b----
operator. since1-962, __My- operation has Q0-1[]ilsnwc. anid T bAvP heen_--
managing the waste as a
Sail & Water Conservati
�
itself, although do_own the cows, I have tat ri TC,. W. Allen
- �..� Saz.,_._ ke—tn._ the ❑a�rne r-1,-1- �.� -. )
about the requirements of 0-200 regulations and be isto allow for
improbements to be made. -_
I signed a NC Cost Share Contract on 6-3-96 for the amount of $6-S9'A
for construction of wastepond. However, I had been waiting for the an�rnva7
of a loan that would' allow mn .to hes,in work. I already have the irrigation
equipment on site. The buffers have beelii fenced out and will be im rnupij
when the waste storage pond is completed this summer. Design of waste storage
pond was completed on I0-27-97 by NRCS. _
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not resiocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
12lan to begin construction of waste storage pond this summer_oendin
my cost share application.
I have a waste plan and will dispose of waste through irri at'on
and the use of a honey wagon. I already_ have the necessary equipment
to do this.
Applicant's Certification:
I, Harry J. Machialek , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this annlication are not completed and if all
required su ortinn information and attachments ar not inci ded this apXlication ackage will
-12
this document removes nay respoDsibility and liability for complying with all North Carolina
_Harry J. Macialek
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

`Reams d Items:
' .One f l) original and two (2) copies o[the completed and appropriately executed
application form, along_x•ith any attachments.
1
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ;ALL SUPPORTING
LNF0R%lAT1ON AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLONVIING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Pape 4 of 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C.W. Allen Jr
Harry], Macialek Dairy
2118 Hwy 96
Creedmoor NC 27522
Dear C.W. Allen Jr:
r••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
Subject: Request for Status Update .
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
Facility Number: 3 9 - 6
Granville County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a .
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. if you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

jy"��
L
�rvo� 'Vol r?Rj f )�n/J
0 Z ;91x� fed u� h �A170 sC
mD-
n M d v { ` 0
,7l" f �J/g0I rl/ T-)v,
I 'of °F
wFcl rjcj .7r4 rl I
tyg kl� -gb

Mq (—/� LC f—,
1 i- ref
CZY
i1 ) m ?die (SACYue- �1
A 00Q. ��S 66h7YaCJs � b (.2x?1 s

y eurchette, USDA - NRC
ialek, Granville Co.
ects\mak\mak,DWG
Date: 11-03-97
Time: 14:46:11
Page: 1
S I T E D E S I G N- VOLUME CALCULATIONS
1 3
PRISMOIDAL METHOD
ORIGINAL SURFACE
original ground
FINAL SURFACE
Final Site
CUT COMPACTION FACTOR
15.00 % SHRINK
FILL COMPACTION FACTOR
5.00 % SWELL
RAW CUT VOLUME
2156.32 CY
CMP CUT VOLUME
1832.87 CY
RAW FILL VOLUME
044.70 CY
CMP FILL VOLUME
886.94 CY
1)OQmP I5 1 Cac'od4J oo Gtn $ 1 s�wp-Q- .t A -n
.2 PD-j .5p--C, Ar0.a i 1 &Lop 5 �oLl.,rnQ.
cllc.c- Q� Q 21,11 .41 dr /S • �0 Ccu.�j d
,g w r e-c, n,,-& J

OH-Ver 2.0
US Department of Agriculture
Soil. Conservation Service
DESIGN WORKSHEET
for
Xrapezoidal Channel Section
prepared for
JAMES MACIALEK
in
GRANVILLE County, North Carolina
signer TB Checkere&to—
te 11/03/97 Date �� g
Ce100OWM�1�1 WXM
ope = 0.0-040 ft/ft Hydr Radius = 0.22
value = 0.010 Area = 0.45 sq.ft.
Velocity - 3.5 fps
Capacity - 1.55 cfs
Sideslope = 0.0 :1
Bottom width 0.7 ft.
Depth = 0.7 ft.
Width Q Flow Depth = 0.7 ft.
E NOY 0 7 1997 '
}}fir; cr.q+r-

OH--Ver 2.0
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
DESIGN WORKSHEET
for
Orifice Flow Formula Solution
prepared for
4MES MACIALEK
in
GRANVILLE County, North Carolina
3ner : TB
11/03/97
GUTTER DOWN SPOUT PIPE DESIGN
Checker e __
Date
Orifice Coefficient .............. 0.60
Diameter of Orifice .............. 8.0 in.
Head on Orifice .................. 0.5 ft.
Orifice Capacity ................. 1.2 cfs

_ i -16 aacio-&k Dairs
rvcL- ct&O
Cr-6
W" �wo -<poLW w4k,
NOV 0 7 1997

A
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources A4
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NQRTM G4R0UNA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NArUMAL RE3puRcEs
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 12, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. C.W. Allen, Jr.
2118 HWY 96
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522
Subject: Notice of Violation
Facility 4 39-6
Harry J. Macialek Farm
Granville County
Dear Mr, Allen:
On October 8, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection
of the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the cattle operation was not discharging wastewater into waters of the State at
the time of the inspection. However, conditions exists such that it is reasonable to believe that discharges and
contaminated runoff do occurred. These conditions should be addressed immediately to prevent an illegal
discharge of wastewater to waters of the State, which is subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, per
violation.
With the current design of your facility, parlor waste and lot runoff discharge via a ditch and flow approximately
700 feet over a failing filter area to a fresh water pond. Also, accumulated solid waste drains approximately 1000
feet to the pond. Parlor waste is not considered a minimal discharge since the volume can be reasonably collected
acid stored. Therefore, the parlor waste must be contained. Lot runoff can be allowed to flow over land adjacent
to the lot provided this area is appropriately vegetated, cattle are excluded form the area to protect the vegetation,
the lot is scraped frequently, and no waste can be visibly traced to waters of the State. Dry stack solid waste
should be covered or the contaminated runoff' should be collected. In addition, I recommend you seek the
technical assistance of the Granville Soil and Water Conservation District on establishing buffers, stream
crossings, and/or exclusions appropriate for your facility. Please respond in writing to this office, within 14 days
of receipt of this letter, outlining your plans to correct the above problems.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609 _ Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501/6 recycled/10% poet -consumer paper

C.W. Allen, Jr.
page 2
I would like to remind you of the requirement to have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan by December
31,1997. This plan must be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. I encourage
you to seek the assistance of the technical specialist of your choice to ensure all necessary modifications to your
operation are implemented and certified prior to the statutory deadline. For a listing of certified technical
specialists or assistanxe with your waste management plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation
District office,
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. if you have any questions regarding
this inspection please call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, F.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Granville County Health Department
Diana Lewis, Granville Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
>RRO Files

i
x���' �❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Qperation Review � � ��,� a�
�' � `�WQ Animal Feedlot 4peratian Site Inspection � � � 7>�
. ' 3
• e aw"rvcsswavn...+mvrc-s�,w+r+�eemvm+..�+wx<-e�+.m.w.-,m-- r ., .,F F4'... • ,:.E• n S. a. �Ke
outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DXV(2 ins eTtion O Follow-up of DSWC; review Q Other
Facility NumberDate of Inspection k��'
Time of Inspection �] 24 hr. (hh:mm)
registered © Certified `[3 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not O eratianal Date Last Operated: ......................
perated:......................
Farm Name: YV" J M4tGi � � Count ...,... ...Y.......... .............. .. ...... ............................................................. ..................... y: a+'� ll...
�lPhone
(� �a
Owner lame: �-�. s�?!ti,r...f..�'. .............................................................. I honr� No:..�....,.,.�.5.�-�$,..;.�.V�..1.�..........
Facility Contact:Y!fl%.....G4�lsC�,.i` 9,, .... Title:► ,4,?•lfl�>~.......... Phone No:......,.... r?�34�
... tit
Mailing Address:... Z�.� �..,.. `�. �� 5:r�.;��'k�gs).... �.r �- �-�... ............... ..........................
Onsite Representative:�............................................ Integrator:...,........................,.,.......................................................
Certified Operator��w .... C......................................... Operator Certification Number,.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Design Current.
Swine ; Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current - �Desigii Current,
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity, Population...
❑ Layer airy �'Z��] `S
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other ,
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Pntds [� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improve ment'? � � �� ,es
❑� Y[Ies No
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? M Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field her , ^ vn7r
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? �� ❑ Yes ED-ldo
b. If discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, noti'v DWQ) ❑ Yes 62 <Io
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min°
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
9<O
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
211yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
iIKo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
W�o
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desi�an?
❑ Yes
(�[�o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
❑ Yes
Q-Ko
7/25/97 Continued on back

r ~
Facility Number::" —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.1-folding Ponds Flush Pits etc. }�[
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard(fU:..........................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes 9<o
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
.................................... .................................. I . ....................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ... !� ..t..... !+ c 4.N... �.....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24,. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0• No.violations-or deficiencies we're'noted daring this visit.- :You will receive no further
ctirrespofideht a aUout this:visit: ,::
rs amend it i
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
................ I..., ......... I.......
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑-150—
❑ Yes ❑'<
❑ Yes 2-5-o
❑v'fes ❑ No
❑ Yes RIKo"
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes [:]No
. c�-sue 1� S �Jc. p �, ��-�t�g1��►1t�c� ���+r� �•i� b �,�e�5 �-�'�,wu
U
z. ��.r�v,-- �.xast,�, � 1,a�- ��,c�' di�lr,c-a�� .r►� �����, •#� �'�.1��
d� ����k dry �-1s ��ar�•�,�,:�+-- t ac1c� �� g�
Ay r-i "a C"�' k oc vja*q \a ---ram 7/25/97H,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: tits a`l

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources&146ja
F1,0WA
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Pt E H N RJonathan B. Howes, SecretaryDivision of Soil and Water Conse
June 12, 1997
C. W. Allen Jr.
Harry J. Malialek Dairy
2118 Hwy. 96
Creedmoor, NC 27522
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation
Harry J. Malialek Dairy Facility No. 39-6
Granville County
Dear Mr. Day,
On June 10, an Operation Review was conducted of Harry J. Malialek Dairy, facility no. 39-6. This
Review, underta�pn in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered
livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site
inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information. The following observances were discovered and noted for corrective action or
response:
1. Buffer areas and the waste management system needed improvement. Please continue to work
with the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and NRCS to improve the system. .
2. No irrigation equipment currently on site since waste was managed as a dry litter system.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
D%64--f—
Margaret O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Granville Soil and Water Conservation District
J�'Garrett; Wgter Quality•Regio651-Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609N%q C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
December 5, 1996
C.W. Allen Jr
Harry J. Macialek Dairy
2118 Hwy 96
Creedmoor NC 27522
Dear Mr. Allen Jr:
1DEEHNFz
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Harry J. Macialek Dairy
Facility ID #: 39-6
Granville County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to but the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
'6�
FOftve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc. Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Wafer Pollution Control System MI W �� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certificatlon Commission �� An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 16, 1996
Mr. Harry J.,Macialek
2118 Hwy 96
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Harry J. Macialek Dairy Operation
Facility Number 39-6
Granville County
Dear Mr. Macialek:
On August 1, 1996, Ms. Vanessa Manuel of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a Compliance Inspection of the subject animal
facility accompanied by yourself. Both your on -site assistance and
cooperation was very helpful and appreciated. The inspection is a
part of the Division's efforts to annually inspect registered
animal operations. As a result of the inspection, the following
comments and/or recommendations were developed:
1. At the time of the inspection, wastewater from this
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the
State. No manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of discharging wastewater)
were observed.
2. The subject facility discharges its parlor waste through
a distribution pipe to a ditch which leads to one of two
ponds located on the property. However, as you stated
during the inspection, the piping system is currently
clogged. The clogged distribution pipe has caused
improper transfer of waste via overland flow.
3. Your facility does not have a holding pond to collect,
treat, or store the animal waste. The animal waste is
stored on a pad until removed for the purpose of land
application. Because of the possibility of overland flow
from waste runoff, this office strongly recommends that
you consider installing a holding pond to contain your
animal waste. You may want to contact your local Soil -
and Water Conservation District at 919/693-4603 to
determine if Cost Share Money is available to assist with
the cost.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Water Quality is required to enforce water quality regulations in
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N =f C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50°%o recycled/10% post -consumer paper

CP✓4- o er•�''' A r
N o 0C� 0-
CY19_.
order to protect the natural resources of the State.
This off' a would like to take this op(/y
tunitto inform you tha
all dair operations wi 100 head tle or more are r uir
to have a c rtified a for in ch of h it anim wamanageme sy tams by Jan ry 1, 199 aid dat 0 1 acertifi oper tor, o some ne u er he visio , may a p yanimal ste t th land. P ase cn err 1 wi t eTrainin and Ce t' ication Group at 926 find ou m re
informa ion on the certification requirements.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a designated
technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of
certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste
management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
In addition to continued waste facility management, the
deficiencies noted in items 2 and 3 above must be immediately
addressed to help prevent the possibility of an illegal discharge.
Please respond to the Raleigh Regional Office with a written
response to the aforementioned issues by September 16, 1996. You
should specifically address how you plan to correct the problems
and submit a schedule (with dates) stating when these management
deficiencies will be corrected.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection or if
this office may be of further assistance, please feel free to
contact Ms. Manuel at 919/571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Granville County Health Department
Granville County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility Assessment Unit
a:\inspects\violatio\hj080l96.mdn
01

k-Vi.s44
- Facilit Number: q -.�_
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: S 1N
Time: I
uenerai inTormation:
Farm Name: porry
Owner Name:
One Site Representative:]
Mailing Address: Z�
Physical Address/Location
Mafia lek County: 1Wr7V1'/I%
Phone No: 528-3d�3
Integrator:
Z ZZ
rr, q M. e ,A). !4 9
Latitude: / 1 Longitude: 1 I
Operation Description: (based on design characterlstles)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of attle No. of Animals
Osow Mayer DairyY.-ca 4
❑Nursery ONon-Layer 013eef
oFeader
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:0—(include in the Drawings and Observations the. freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon 00 L� C' o P n r M >�
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No
is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ N ❑
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ o ❑
Is any discharge observed?: Yes No.❑a
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop.
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No G7�
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No El-*"
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: =���j S,,—,.4it Acreage: _5 wo - 13o
y
` MD/D j

Setback -Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No Oz
Is a weH located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No [Y
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet _/
of Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No Ur
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?.: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes ❑ jqo ❑
Doss record keeping need improvement?: ., ('eC�,-y2s VNo ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site S Rt� ks Yes to ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: '�/�" �• Date: 4�
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations:
`7�t.c, �Cr � �7 ,rCur�� it � dr's eh�� is✓s PQ,-/a.,- �1As� ,� a- •
` t 44 WX / Z Penis Zaci-AAI ovr I` .
ye-1 r2aG�
tQ ,per • L�rl P.r W i`%� J?�PD� }�p S � fA) ,(&V OSJ1 )/z 4
AOI-January 17, 1996

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 16, 1996
Mr. Harry J. Macialek
2118 Hwy 96
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Harry J. Macialek Dairy Operation
Facility Number 39-6
Granville County
Dear Mr. Macialek:
On August 1, 1996, Ms. Vanessa Manuel of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a Compliance Inspection of the subject animal
facility accompanied by yourself. Both your on -site assistance and
cooperation was very helpful and appreciated. The inspection is a
part of the Division's efforts to annually inspect registered
animal operations. As a result of the inspection, the following
comments and/or recommendations were developed:
1. At the time of the inspection, wastewater from this
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the
State. No .manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of discharging wastewater)
were observed.
2. The subject facility discharges its parlor waste through
a distribution pipe to a ditch which leads to one of two
ponds located on the property. However, as you stated
during the inspection, the piping system is currently
clogged. The clogged distribution pipe has caused
improper transfer of waste via overland flow.
3. Your facility does not have a holding pond to collect,
treat, or store the animal waste. The animal waste is
stored on a pad until removed for the purpose of land
application. Because of the possibility of overland flow
from waste runoff, this office strongly recommends that
you consider installing a holding pond to contain your
animal waste. You may want to contact your local Soil
and Water Conservation District at 919/693-4603 to
determine if Cost Share Money is available to assist with
the cost.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Water Quality is required to enforce water quality regulations in

r � '
0 1*
order to protect the natural resources of the State.
This office would like to take this opportunity to inform you that
all dairy operations with 100 head of cattle or more are required
to have a certified operator in charge of their animal waste
management systems by January 1, 1997. After said date, only a
certified operator, or someone under his/her supervision, may apply
animal waste to the land. Please contact Ron Ferrell with the
Training and Certification Group at 919/733-0026 to find out more
information on the certification requirements.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a designated
technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of
certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste
management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
In addition to continued waste facility management, the
deficiencies noted in items 2 and 3 above must be immediately
addressed to help prevent the possibility of an illegal. discharge.
Please respond to the Raleigh Regional Office with a written
response to the aforementioned issues by September 16, 1996. You
should specifically address how you plan to correct the problems
and submit a schedule (with dates) stating when these management
deficiencies will be corrected.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection or if
this office may be of further assistance, please feel free to
contact Ms. Manuel at 919/571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Granville County Health Department
Granville County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility Assessment Unit
a:\inspects\violatio\hj08Ol96.mdn
(�1

`VIS-1`t
. �- Facilit Number:. -�`
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitatlon Record
Date: I %
Time: 1 3t7 ,�•
General Information:
Farm Name: r
Owner Name: A lied
One Site Representative:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location
County: /Larm'l %
'hone No: 5'29 -3AI3
Integrator: AjU
llA rl 96
WAPr+2Z
, q 'm r ,t1,
Latitude: ' I 1 Longitude: I I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry: No. of Animals Type of attle No. f Animals
❑Sow OLayer XDairy 1"
oNursery oNon--Layer ❑Beef
❑Feeder
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals;
Number of Lagoons:,(include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
;, r5`o - 20.0
tL / Ta�4 L
Lagoon r �0 / /1 C? 0,9M
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 toot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ©No.
Is seepage observed from the.lagoon?: _ Yes ❑ N ❑ `,
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ o ❑
Is any discharge observed?: - Yes No ❑
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop. - V -
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No,6P,*"�•
Does the cover crop need Improvement?: Yes ❑ No IY
(list the crops which need -improvement)
Crop type: (1-1-4 Acreage:
_M_D/0

l Setback -Criteria'
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?:
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?:
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?:
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?: ,
Maintenance
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑NoItV
Yes ❑No���Z`
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operatlon?: Yes ❑ o ❑
Does record keeping need improvement?: j,J; �k � n WL*—Y s Iy No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site--,,d 2� �IS W� OJ T . Yes P 0 ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: �T Date:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations: `
7i4Cr �, �7 ,,.rrL d G�r's GLi� I.ZS
41
Ael4Of s
%,4r0� o�eli Y'/
Gl�is a. 0)41 4W4,2/�,' e, POr/&r ram• • v ��'/� .
AOI—January 17; 1996

I
Site Requikrnmediate ttcnd:c)X
Facility No.
.DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL &LATiAGE?V£ENT
ANTNI LL FEEDLOT OPER.A1`10N2 SrTE VISITATION RECORD
E.:
DAT
Fawn Nartle/0me
Mailing Address:
Counry --
7nte�,-atar. -- Phone: - -
On Site Representative:
Phvsicsl Add_*�slLocadon:
Phone:
19
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design. Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM. Cerdfcat?on Number: ACE- DEM CerdEcauon Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevarion: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .ARirnai Waste Lagoon have sufficiznr freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot T 7 inches] Yes or No Actual F�eboard: _ _Fr- inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate Izzd available for spray'? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crops) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minim um setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or 10
aui mal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS iVlap Blue Line'? Yes or
CAdZitional
izal' waste dischargcd into waters of the state by ina.n-made ditch, xlusbing system, or other
ir^i'•a*' Man1_made devices'? Yes or NoIf � es. Flcasz E-cpltia1_ MC racffity maintain adequate waste tnanagemcnt records (volumes of ruanure, land applicd_ray irrigatred on s'pccific acreage with cover crop)'' Yes o: C" nts:
1� 7 �.
S i na tune
cc: Facilizy AssCss nt Unit
Use Aiachtments if Needed
TOThL P - 02