20050424 Ver 1_Complete File_20050307

IF
Permit Number: 200531404
Permit Type: NW27
Name of County: Mecklenburg
Name of Permittee: City of Charlotte Storm Water Services / Little Sugar Creek Enhancement
Date of Issuance: April 25, 2005
Project Manager: Amanda D. Jones
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the
permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers
Attention: CESAW-RG-A
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Signature of Pennitt e
Date
ra (F-? [9 N
OCT 11 2005
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to
permit suspension, modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
DENR . WATER QUALITY
&TLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH

Pf
September 20, 2005
aUF? e
0 3.?,? L1-L ?
CA10
MECKL,ENBURG COUNTY
Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Water & Laud Resources
Storm Water Services
Ms. Amanda Jones
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Re: Little Sugar Creek Stream Enhancement
MOREHEAD STREET TO EAST BOULEVARD
vi, UEP T . OF EtVIRC::" tit 9
gill) flATI?ESOURCEO
!;CORES`';'' -«lALOFF168
SEP 2 6 200')
n ?R
1lrl i (?LJ
Dear Ms. Jones:
Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services (MCS WS) has completed the Little Sugar Creek Stream
Enhancement project from Morehead Street to East Boulevard in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Attached is the signed certification of completion form for your records.
If you have any questions or comments, or would like to set up a time for inspection, please call me
at 704-336-7342 or send e-mail to tayloca&o.meeklenburg.ne.us.
Sincerely,

Crystal Taylor, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Alan Johnson, Mooresville DWQ
Cyndi Karoly, Raleigh Wetlands Unit
File
PEOPLE • PRIDE • PROGRESS PARTNERSHIPS
700 North Tryon Strcct • Charlottc, North Carolina 28202-2236 [phone] • Fax [phone]
www.stormwatcrscrviccs.com
o?OF W A TF9pG
co
>
Ms. Crystal Taylor
Mecklenburg County Storm Water Svc.
700 N. Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1% ?..._ . .',i
Alan W. Klimek-. P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 31, 2005
DWQ# 05-0424
Mecklenburg County
Subject: Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Walk Enhancement Project
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Taylor:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact
2390 linear feet (If) of stream to complete the enhancement project of Little Sugar Creek in Mecklenburg
County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on March 7, 2005.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General
Certification Number 3495, which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. The
General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 27 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as well
as the additional conditions listed below:
1. If the design of the project changes or if the project is not constructed according to the design then this
approval is no longer valid and plans must be resubmitted per General Certification 3495. If the project is to
be used for future compensatory mitigation credit then additional written concurrence by this Office is
required.
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMP) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and maintenance of
such BMP in order to protect surface water standards.
3.
Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send photographs of
the upstream and downstream sides of each culvert site to document correct installation, along with the
Certificate of Completion form.
No Carolina
,Na irra!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffinrative Action Employer- 50°b Recyded110 6 Post Consumer Paper
4. Continuing Compliance. The City of Charlotte (the applicant) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not
to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section
303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure
compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure
compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before
codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public
notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 21-1.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be
provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

AK/aj
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands Unit
Emily Godbold, Buck Engineering
Central Files
Triage Check List
Date: 3/10/05 Project Name: Little Sugar Creels Liz Hair Nature Walls
DWQ#: 05-0424
County: Mecklenburg
To: Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
30-day Processing Time: 3/7/05 to 4/5/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
ENGINEERING
March 4, 2005
1 347 11 a r d i n c P l a c e, Suite 1 00
Cha rIottc, N C 29204 `? q
P It o n e 7 0 4 ; 4. 4 4 5 4 5 O'T l 9 `1
Fax: [phone]
w?,ti- w it c1, eit gi n e c ri it g. c om
t
rr)q
Ei ; !
Ms. Cyndi Karoly tt a
NC DENR
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
?2 0
C?
D
MAR 0 7 2005
E'"17W DSAfiD Ta'?MA QUALITy
R BRAWN
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification/401 Certification Package
Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Walk- Stream Enhancement
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Please find enclosed seven copies of our stream enhancement plan set for the subject project. We have
also included the following supporting data:
• PCN form;
• Cross-section and profile surveys of the existing project reach and one reference reach;
• A summary table listing geomorphic parameters for the existing and design channels and two
reference reaches;
• A sediment transport discussion.
The goal of the project is to improve in-stream habitat by placing boulder structures to develop a riffle
and pool bedform sequence. The existing cross-section, pattern, and reach-wide profile of the stream
will not be altered. Existing gabions lining the channel will be repaired at isolated locations as needed.
This project is not being used for compensatory mitigation.
This same information has been submitted to the Asheville Regulatory Field Office of the US Army
Corps of Engineers. If you have any questions, please call me at [phone], extension 106.
Sincerely,
d`
6`0N,
Emily E. Godbold, PE, CFM
Project Manager
Enclosure: 401 Certification Package
Cc: Ms. Crystal Taylor
Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services
P, e c1t0It c I /IIC f_'17? 1 17 C4'7•1 77 :, nnc/ SC iC'itCC /ur Ct 6C l1 C7• F'l7Vir<7R III CIII
C a r v, N o r t h C a r o I i n a - Char I o t t c, N o r t h C a r o I i n a - A t I a n t a, Ci c o r i s
LITTLE SUGAR CREEK LIZ HAIR NATURE WALK
STREAM ENHANCEMENT
SUPPORTING DATA
Prepared For
Prepared By
1347 Harding Place
Charlotte, North Ca
BUCK rolina 28204
February 11, 2005
Suite 100
Phone: [phone]
I y c, I !?? I I It I A A, Fax: [phone]
www. budcengineering.com
.com
PCN/401/404 CERTIFICATION PACKAGE
1 ?
W A TF?Q
?`O G
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.an-ny.mil/wetlands/Pen-n app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http•//wwNvsaw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/revtour.btm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 12
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at htip://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedRea.pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
_ for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 12
D ,
MAR 0 7 2005
Office Use Only: 45 R-YlATEF?r?Uhl+? Form Version April 2001
.DSTV
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Crystal Taylor; PE
Mailing Address: Mecklenburg Counly Storm Water Services
700 N. Tryon Street.
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-336-7342 Fax Number: 704-336-3846
E-mail Address: tayloca(a?co.mecklenburg.nc.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Emily Godbold, PE
Company Affiliation: Buck Enmineerinj
Mailing Address: 1347 Harding Place Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28204
Telephone Number: 704-334-4454 Fax Number: 704-334-4492
E-mail Address: eizodboldaa buekengineeri ng.corn
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
V.
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Walk- Stream Enhancement
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 15302126, 15303513, 15303403, 15301129
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From I-277, take the Kenilworth
Avenue exit. Travel south approximately 1 mile and turn left onto Morehead Street.
Continue approximately 0.5 miles, Little Sugar Creek crosses Morehead Street 0.1 mile north
of the intersection of E Morehead Street and S Kings Drive. The Morehead Street bridge is
the upstream end of the project reach.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35012'20.30" N 80° 50'12.71"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Existing channelized stream is lined on one bank with uabions and concrete trail; adjacent
land use is commercial (hospital) and single-family residential.
7. Property size (acres): approximately 5 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Little Sugar Creek
9. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To improve aquatic habitat by establishing
riffle and pool features and perform minor spot repairs on existing gabions Bank plantigg
with riparian species is planned by a separate firm; these stream enhancement glans do not
include planting details This is not a mitigation project.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Track excavator; loader; dump
truck; hand labor.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: urban commercial and residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 5 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
Reach 1 Enhancement 2,390 Little Sugar Creek 40 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uscs.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 2,390 LF
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The moiect constitutes a positive impact since it will enhance stream function and habitat by
improving bed features in the stream. Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stringide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions; conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http:U12o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Lone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The protect involves work in the stream only; no work will be performed outside the stream
banks and no impervious area will be added during this project. The stream drains 12.5 square
miles of urban watershed. The watershed is approximately 45% impervious.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
CQ_
Ot/Agent's Signa e Datd
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Amory Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Hamett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephoner (919) 8564520 Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 12 of 12
Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Walk Stream Enhancement
€^r:1p1V :T•;.. ?, Sr Dalton Awe - 1mi
Tuckasoegoo Rd m
d Cha'dotto a ,
;1' A o
a
a -P
w
v G7 P ?sY. ,rbo chrOO d
t N o. ?sr ar,? _
a° Rama
>s E Woodlavitt Rd `' '°?> o
c
4a 4j, 7?'c rGt b
TYya?i Runnymede Ltt vPa .o~?o
L1 v d
0 2005 MzipQuert.com, inc.; 0 2005 NAVTEQ
Vicinity Map
,1nPnVzsT • ; z 5`
0 300tn
_ ? R° ? s a e?e`c??? $a ?qtej??340ft
?spirJi?k?v a P;Zo ?jo '17 a? , ? ? Qa'D xt?,rs/ t
°Q? rycnley PI Dartmou h PI
H or meta g o Ct
,? .!r carul;rr?s i 6?°- c, bloraran Lrt
b `r7a. ?, M1fedical y
D unstvickAva o?
Rd
J. 7r-SITE S Ed4?ttiS11
O? - ROJECTti I % O
Z m' _ z
m - ArdaloyRd_
O
(rro ?rr I -- b GrDCr ro
ae /aPd?ly IO?Q?o „ Q?
4
ComVrar pt
r ?\°ta?P .fib Wt'c??cHyda??
`C q,' Lomb a(dy Cu Nc7, Ave Goa
R a oQ az oh G` a q Qt
o z Freedom z? >1
Park pcmbtoke Ave > p
® 2005 MapQuest.com, lnc.; 0 2005 NAVTEQ.`
Site Map
o b
S
Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Trail- Stream Enhancement
Sediment Transport Summary
Sediment Sampling
Buck collected three sediment samples along the project reach using pavement-
subpavement and modified Wolman 100-count sampling techniques. Most riffles contain
a large percentage of embedded riprap sized particles that appear to have sloughed into
the channel from gabions and adjacent banks. The embedded nature and algal growth on
these larger particles indicate that they are not likely mobile during bankfull events. For
our pavement-subpavement sample, we selected a location that appeared to be most
representative of the mobile portion of the riffles. We conducted a wetted perimeter
zigzag pebble count at a riffle to characterize the pavement materials.
Analysis
We checked sediment transport competency of the existing channel reaches using the
methodology developed by Rosgen and Jessup (Jessup, personal communication, 2002).
This methodology is based on dimensionless critical shear stress that is determined from
ratios of pavement to subpavement particle sizes. From the dimensionless critical shear
stress estimates, critical depth and water surface slope can be estimated and used to check
a design. We also used a boundary shear stress calculation and a modified version of
Shield's curve to estimate the largest particle size that can be moved in the channel. Our
stream enhancement work will not adjust the existing cross-section of the creek;
however, we investigated whether the stream can be expected to aggrade or degrade over
time given its existing geomorphic characteristics.
The attached spreadsheets summarize the sediment sample data and analysis results.
Graphs summarizing sieve analysis and pebble count data are included. Our calculations
indicate that the existing stream slope of 0.0016 feet per foot is less than the critical slope
of 0.0029 feet per foot needed to transport the cobble-sized fraction of the bed meterial.
Similarly, the existing depth of 3.3 feet is less than the critical depth of 5.9 feet. These
results indicate that aggradation could be a problem along the project reach if coarse
sediment were being supplied to the system. However, the supply of coarse sediment in
the size range of concern (greater than about 90 mm) is very limited in a developed,
urban watershed such as Little Sugar Creek. Furthermore, The existing channel appears
to be moving its sediment load adequately as evidenced by the lack of mid-channel bars.
Referring to the modified Shield's curve, the largest movable particle size for the channel
is 60 to 90 millimeters (mm), which indicates that the 75 mm maximum subpavement
particle collected during the subpavement sampling may be mobile during bankfull
events.
The analyses did not indicate a degradation concern, such as boundary shear stresses well
in excess of those required to move the largest subpavement particle sizes. Proposed in-
stream boulder structures will provide grade control as additional safety measures against
degradation.
1347 Hwdtl g Plata
.17 Surte 100
Charbtte, NoM CaroAna 2810{
Phone: [phone]
E. (? 1 \ f-. F. f. F¢ 704 334.4491
_ bude.ginee 4 tom
Page 1 of 1
IL
n
ui
N
O
O
C
Little Sugar. Creek
Liz Hair Nature Walk (Morehead to East)
X1 Subpavement- Particle Size Distribution
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
LL
= 50%
m
m
a 40%
30% -
20% -
10% -
0%
0.01
l-Subpavement
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000
10000
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\LSUG-LIZ HAIR-X1-RIFFLE-SUBPAVEMENT.xis, Distribution Graph 2/2/2005
SIEVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
BUCK PROJECT NO. 143
SITE OR PROJECT: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK - LIZ HAIR REACH
REACH/LOCATION: MOREHEAD TO EAST BLVD X1 RIFFLE SUBPAVEMENT
DATE COLLECTED: 101512004
FIELD COLLECTION BY: JBP
DATA ENTRY BY: UE
RETAINED ON SIEVE PARTICLE CLASS WEIGHT (g) Class Cumulative
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) SIEVE SIZE (mm) SIEVE NUMBER Raw Tare Net % %
SA/Clay <.063 16.0 13.5 2.5 0% 0%

i•s ? is Very Fine .063 -.125 0.063 #230 17.4 13.5 3.9 0% 0%
Fine .125-.25 0.125 #120 34.5 13.5 21.0 0% 1%
SAND Medium .25-.50 0.25 #60 122.1 13.5 108.6 2% 3%
Coarse .50 -1.0 0.5 #35 339.4 13.5 325.9 7% 10%
' ;: i Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 1.0 #18 400.6 13.5 387.1 8% 18%
o Very Fine 2.0-4.75 2.0 #10 322.4 13.5 308.9 7% 25%
Fine - Medium 4.75-12.5 4.75 #4 535.8 13.5 522.3 11% 36%
GRAVEL Medium - Coarse 12.5-25 12.5 112 IN
781.9
13.5
768.4
16%
52%
o Coarse 25-45 25 11N 587.2 13.5 573.7 12% 64% .
c Very Coarse 45-64 1199.7 13.5 1186.2 25% 89%
Small 64 - 90 514.2 13.5 500.7 11% 100%
cosBLE Small 90.128 0.0 0% 100%
O t Large 128-180 0.0 0% 100%
Large 180-256 0.0 0% 100%
Small 256-362 0.0 0% 100%
BOULDER Small 362-512 0.0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0.0 0% 100%
Large - Very Large 1024 - 2048 0.0 0% 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 0.0 0% 1000
Total 4871.2 162.0 4709.2 100%
Largest Particle Size: 74 mm
Refer to ASTM D 422-63 'Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils'
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\LSUG-LIZ HAIR- X1-RIFFLE-SUSPAVEMENT.xls, Data 2/2/2005
Little Sugar Creek
Liz Hair Nature Walk (Morehead to East)
X1 Pavement Particle Size Distribution
100%
-0-Pavement
80% - -- -
?- 60%
m
c
LL
c 50%
Q
V
Q
a. 40%
30% -
20% -
10% -
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000
10000
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\LSUG-LIZ HAIR-X-1-RIFFLE-PAVEMENT-1 OF 1.xls, Distribution Graph 2/2/2005
SIEVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
BUCK PROJECT NO. 143
SITE OR PROJECT: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK - LIZ HAIR REACH
REACHILOCATION: MOREHEAD TO EAST BLVD X1 RIFFLE PAVEMENT
DATE COLLECTED: 10/512004
FIELD COLLECTION BY: JBP
DATA ENTRY BY: JBP
RETAINED ON SIEVE PARTICLE CLASS WEIGHT (g) Class Cumulative
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) SIEVE SIZE (mm) SIEVE NUMBER Raw T. Net
'M UIIl_AY Silt/Clay <.063 0.0
' ....... ::: Very Fine .063-.125 0.063 #230 0.0 0% 0%

SAND Fine

Medium .125-.25

.25-50 0.125

0.25 #120

#60 0.0

0.0 0%

0% 0%

0%
Coarse .50-1.0 0.5 #35 0.0 0% 0%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 1.0 #18 0.0 0% 0%
o Very Fine 2.0-4.75 2.0 #10 0.0 0% 0%
e Fine - Medium 4.75-12.5 4.75 94 16.7 13.5 3.2 0% 0%
GRAVEL Medium - Coarse 12.5-25 12.5 1/2 IN 85.2 13.5 71.7 2% 2%
o` Coarse 25-45 25 1 IN 427.7 13.5 414.2 10% 12%
cb Very Coarse 45 - 64 661.8 13.5 648.3 16% 27%
Small 64-90 289.7 13.5 276.2 7% 34%
COBBLE Small 90 -128 2784.0 27.0 2757.0 66% 100%
O Large 128-180 0.0 0% 100%
Large 180-256 0.0 0% 100%
Small 256 - 362 0.0 0% 100%
BOULDER Small 362 - 512 0.0 0% 100%
Medium 512 -1024 0.0 0% 100%
Large - Very Large 1024 - 2048 0.0 0% 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock >2048 0.0 0% 100%
Total 4265.1 94.5 4170.6 100%
Largest Particle Size: 120 mm
Refer to ASTM D 422-63 'Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils'
L:\Projects\0143C1Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\LSUG-LIZ HAIR-X-1-RIFFLE-PAVEMENT-1 OF 1.xls, Data 2/11/2005
Little Sugar Creek
Liz Hair Nature Walk (Morehead to East)
X1 Riffle Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% -?-Riffle Data
80% -
70% -
60%
c
LL
c 50%
U
O. 40%
30% -
20%
10% -
0% 4-
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\X-1 Riffle Pebble Count.xls, Riffle Dist 2/2/2005
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 143
SITE OR PROJECT: LSC - LIZ Hair Reach
REACH/LOCATION: X-1 Riffle 100 Count
DATE COLLECTED: 10/5/2004
FIELD COLLECTION BY: JBP
DATA ENTRY BY: WE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % cum
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay <.063 0%
u .......................... Very Fine .063-.125 0%
Fine .125-.25 2 2% 2%
: A ' Medium .25-50 2%
r:
' .
.
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
3
3%
5%
x...'44-.K... Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 5%
OHO
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 5%
?
?(
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
5%
O1
C `
Fine
4.0-5.6
1
1%
6%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 6 6% 12%

A
V C
Medium
8.0-11.0
2
2%
14%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 1 1% 15%
0 L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 4 4% 19%
C
Coarse
22.6 - 32
8
8%
27%
C
n o 0nn: Very Coarse 32 - 45 14 14% 41%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 15 15% 55%
??) C Small 64 - 90 12 12% 67%
Small 90 - 128 14 14% 81%
COBBLE
U Large 128 - 180 9 9% 90%
O Large 180 - 256 6 6% 96%
Small 256 - 362 4 4% 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
?- Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 101 100%
Largest particles: 320
(riffle)
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\X-1 Riffle Pebble Count.xis, Riffle Data 2/2/2005
Little Sugar Creek
Liz Hair Nature Walk (Morehead to East)
Pebble Count Particle Size Distributions
100%
90%
80%
70%
L 60%
d
c
U.
E 50%
0
u
a. 40%
30% -
20% -
10% -
0%
0.01
-+?-Reach Composite
--?-Riffle Data
--a-- Pool Data
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000
10000
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\Little Sugar, Liz Hair Read Wide Pebble County.xls, Reach-Wide Distribution 2/2/2005
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: REACH-WIDE COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 143
SITE OR PROJECT: Little Sugar Creek - Liz Hair Reach
REACH/LOCATION: Reach-Wide Pebble Count
DATE COLLECTED: 10/5/2004
FIELD COLLECTION BY: JBP/IJE
DATA ENTRY BY: MR
PARTICLE CLASS WEIGHT (g) Reach Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Pool Total Class % % Cum
f:I111GLAY Silt/Clay <.063 1 1 1% 1%
Very Fine .063 - .125 2 2 2% 3%
Fi•i:'ii'i'i ;i; i
..

Fine

125-
25

5

5%

8%
S .
. j
A Medium .25-50 2 1 3 3% 11%
o . t
Coarse .50-1.0 3 3 3% 14%

Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 14%
O L
l
, Very Fine 2.0-2.8 1 1 1 % 15%
I
e Very Fine 2.8-4.0 15%
Fine 4.0-5.6 1 8 9 9% 24%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
2
2
2%
26%
IC
A
V Medium 8.0 - 11.0 6 1 7 7% 33%
E Medium 11.0 - 16.0 2 5 7 7% 40%
L O 3 4 4 44
Coarse 16.0-22.6 1 % %

P C
Coarse
22.6 - 32
3
4
7
7%
50%
Cn O
D ???
Very Coarse
32 - 45
3
3
6
6%
56%
%
Very Coarse 45-64 4 2 6 6% 62%
Small 64-90 5 4 9 9% 71%
Small 90 -128 9 4 13 13% 84%
COBBLE
Large 128 - 180 7 4 11 11% 95%
Large 180-256 4 4 4% 99%
Small 256 - 362 1 1 1 % 100%

? Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULIER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
` BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 50 51 101 100% 100%
Largest particles:
320 mm
(riffle) (pool)
Riffle S ummary Pool S ummary
Class % % cum Class % % Cum
0% 2% 2%
4% 4% 2%
4% 10% 12%
4% 8% 2% 14%
8% 6% 20%
8% 20%
8%
8% 2% 22%
22%
2% 10% 16% 37%
10% 4% 41%
12% 22% 2% 43%
4% 26% 10% 53%
2% 28% 6% 59%
6% 34% 8% 67%
6% 40% 6% 73%
8% 48% 4% 76%
10% 58% 8% 84%
18% 76% 8% 92%
14% 90% 8% 100%
8% 98% 100%
2% 100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100% 100% 100%
L:1Projects\0143C\Assessment\Exist_Cond\Sediment\Little Sugar, Liz Hair Read Wide Pebble County.xls, Reach-Wide Data 2/2/2005
I

Cross-section Data:
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area " BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle B 139.4 42.63 3.27 4.81 13.04 2.3 1.7 617.1 622.7
Cross-Section X1 Station 26+31
626.00
624.00
c 622.00 ---------------------------------------------..........
620.00
618.00
616.00
W 614.00
612.00 Existing Sidewalk
610.00
100.00 110.00 120.00 130.00 140.00 150.00160.00 170.00 180.00 1 00 200.00
Station F_ o - ' Bankfull - - a - • Floodprone
Existing Sidewalk
f ?
y.f 1? C.? s. ?? }.w
- 01
14
-..-
f
••i?-x'l' ?Km's ? ? ? ? 37
ILI
Cross-section Data:
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth WlD BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 188.3 45.35 4.15 6.25 10.92 2 1.8 617.4 623.8
Cross-Section X2 Station 25+89
626
624 -----------------------------------

-
- -------------------
r 622
620
618 ........................................
°-' 616
w 614
_111*
612 Existing Sidewale
610

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
Station o- - Bankfull - - o- - Floodprone
Morphological Measurement Table
Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Trail- Stream Enhancement
Cam pbell Cr eek Silas Creek - Jessup Existi ng Cond itions De sign Parameters
per Geo morphic Survey
Parameter Units AVG MIN MAX AVG h11N MAX AVG MIN h1AX MIN MAX Rationale
Stream Type Ros en
Draina a Area
DA
SO MI E4
6
06 B4c11 III B4c B4c no change to existing conditions
,
Bankfull Discharge, Qbkf
CFS . 3.3
199 12.5 12.5 no change to existing conditions

Bankfull Riffle XS Area, Abkf
SF
62.9
58.6
67.1
43.5
38.5 48
9 1450
206
5
139
4
243
4 1450
139 243 no change to existing conditions
h

Bankfull Mean Velocity, Vbkf
FPS
0.0
4
6 . .
7
0 . . no c
an a to existing conditions

Bankfull Width
FT
24.6
24.4
24.8 .
25.6
23.1 28.0 .
49.3
42.6
53.5 7.0
42.6 53.5 no change to existing conditions
no change to existing conditions
Bankfull Mean Depth
Width to Depth Ratio
W/D FT
FT/FT 2.6
9
7 2.4 2.8 1.7 1.5 1.9 4.1 3.3 4.6 3.3 4.6 no change to existing conditions
,
Bankfull Max Depth
Dmax .
4
3 8.9
11 10.5 15.1 12.4 17.2 12.0 11.4 13.0 11.4 13.0 no chan a to existing conditions
,
Max Depth Ratio, Dmax/Dbkf .
1
3
1
3 3.7
1
3 2.7
1
6 2.4 2.9 6.9 4.8 8.5 4.6 8.5 no change to existing conditions

Bank Height Ratio, Dtob/Dmax
FT/FT .
1
0 .
1
0 .
1
0 .
1
0 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.9 no change to existing conditions

Width of Flood prone Area, Wf a
FT .
>85 . . .
33
7
33
0 35
0 2.0
>85 1.8 2.3 1.8 2.3 no change to existing conditions

Entrenchment Ratio, Wf a/Wbkf
FT/FT
>3.5 .
1
3 .
.
1
2 1
4
>1
7 >85
>1
7 no change to existing conditions

Meander Wavelength, Lm
FT
400 .
168
3 .
.
130 245 . . no change to existing conditions

Meander Wavelength Ratio, Lm/Wbkf
16.7 .
6
6
5
1 9
6 no change to existing conditions

Meander Width, Wblt
FT
90.0 .
43
7 .
.
40 51 no change to existing conditions

Meander Width Ratio, WbIUWbkf
3.7 .
1
7
1
6 2
0 no change to existing conditions

Radius of Curvature, Rc
FT
89
71
107 .
41
3 .
.
19
5 54
0 no change to existing conditions

Rc Ratio, Rc/Wbkf
3.8
3.0
4
5 .
1
6 .
.
0
8 2
1 no change to existing conditions

Valle Slope, Sval
FT/FT
0.0067 . .
0.0088 .
.
0.0016
0.0016 no change to existing conditions
no change to existing conditions
Water Surface Slope, Schan FT/FT 0.0059 0.0082 0.0016 0.0016 no change to existing conditions
Sinuosity, K Sval/Schan 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 nos ace to address pattern
Riffle Slope, Srif FT/FT 0.0164 0.0128 0.0187 0.02 0.058 7.05 0.0293 0.0070 0.0456 0.0032 0.0048
Riffle Slope Ratio, Srif/Schan 2.8 2.2 3.2 2.4 0.1 8.6 17.8 4.4 28.5 2.0 3.0 Campbell RR
Pool Slope, Spool FT/FT 0.00098 0.00022 0.00238 0.00004 0.00000 0.00122 0.0005 0.0000 0.0009 0.0000 0
0005
Pool Slope Ratio, S ool/Schan 0.17 0.04 0.40 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.29 0.00 0.58 0.00 .
0.30 Campbell and Silas RR
Pool Max Depth, Dmax ool FT 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.0 5.0 6.25 8
3 11
6
Pool Max Depth Ratio, Dmax ool/Dbkf 2.0 1.7 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.9 1.5 .
2.0 .
2.8 Campbell and Silas RR
Pool Width, W pool FT 37.5 30.1 44.8 26.0 22.6 28.0 45.4 no change to existing conditions
Pool Width Ratio, W ool/Wbkf 1.5 1.2 1.8 1.0 0.9 1.1 no change to existin conditions
Pool Spacing, I-s FT 104.6 88.9 120.2 62.4 27.2 126.0 299 897 98.6 221.9
Pool-Pool Spacing Ratio, L s/Wbkf 4.3 3.6 4.9 2.4 1.1 4.9 6.1 18.2 2.0 4.5 Campbell and Silas RR
d16 mm <0.062 0.283 r4. no chan a to existin conditions
d35 mm 0.2 0.83 no chan a to existin conditions
d50 mm 45 19.1 no chan a to existin conditions
d84 mm 495 157.5 no change to existing conditions
d95 mm 256 300.2 180 no change to existing conditions
L:\Projects\0143C\Assessment\Design\DesignParamelers_LSCCMC.xis, LSC 143 2/212005 @ 5:36 PM
CAMPBELL CREEK REFERENCE REACH
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 100.7 44.76 2.25 4.47 19.9 0.9 3 101.48 100.84
X1 Pool Cross-Section Station 5+55
108
106 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 104
.2
> 102,
------------------------
w 100
08
96 -1 1
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Station - o- - - Bankfull - - o - • Floodprone
CAMPBELL CREEK REFERENCE REACH
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area -
BKF Width BKF.
Depth Max BKF
Depth `
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle E 58.6 24.78 2.37 3.09 10.47 1 4.2 101.91 101.91
Riffle X2 Cross-Section Station 3+95
106
105 ------------------------------------------------------------------------o
104
w
103
102 ----------------
w 101
100
99
98

100 120 140 160 180 200 220
Station o- - • Bankfull - - o- - • Floodprone
CAMPBELL CREEK REFERENCE REACH
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle E4 67.1 24.39 2.75 3.69 8.86 1 2.7 102.73 102.73
Riffle X3 Cross-Section Station 3+40
108
106 - -------------------------------------------------------------------
c
104
102
w
100
98
90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station - - o - Bankfull o- - Floodprone
CAMPBELL CREEK REFERENCE REACH
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 102.3 30.14 3.39 5.53 8.88 1 2.8 104.9 104.96
Pool X4 Cross-Section Station 1+51
112
110 11 --------------•-----------------------------.----•...------•-------- -------o
a 108
106
104-
u' 102
100
98
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
Station - o- - • Bankfull - - o- - • Floodprone
Campbell Creek Profile
Reference Reach
106-
105-
104-
103-
102-
0
101 -
a?
In
100
99 -
98
97 -
96
100
-- LTOB

v -?-- RTOB
` - ?C- LBKF
- 3K- RBKF
• ? - -c>9-ws
?--Tw

x

150 200 250 300 350 400
Station
450 500
550
600
LITTLE SUGAR CREEK - LIZ HAIR NATURE WALK
STREAM ENHANCEMENT DESIGN
-I; Irl I 1 I ?? S'?, _ y I?
-Z: I
i
q ,
- I -..
37I_
- ------------
!?, 1 P5 /
i - •I I i it 60% PLANS
O c? \
OS it c. 1 ? ?S I ? ?

200 200 400
SCALE (FT)
jr) 17
P., nD
LEGEND OF SYMBOLS
STREAM ALIGNMENT
-"'-. ..- °- EXISTING EDGE OF STREAM
- -- - -- - EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
- UGT - UGT - EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
- OHu - OAu - EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY
- GAS - GAS - EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
- WATER- WATER- EXISTING UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
- Ss - Ss - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
EXISTING VEGETATION
\ \r
EXISTING FENCE LINE
EXISTING GREENWAY TRAIL
- x - x PROPOSED SAFETY FENCE

EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
TT EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION TOWER

EXISTING CATCH BASIN
EXIST CB
L:\Projects\0143C\Design\Pions\PIansheets. dwg Feb 10, 2005
INDEX OF SHEETS
T1 TITLE SHEET
Pt-P5 SITE PLAN
P6-P10 PROFILE
Di DETAILS
X1 TYPICAL SECTION
0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
OD EXISTING STORM MANHOLE OR VAULT
O EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE
EXISTING STORMWATER OUTLET
WV
0 EXISTING WATER VALVE
GV
0 EXISTING GAS VALVE

A.
f i s Rb?.nY y ?; _
r-
???
Carc in
?? ? MedlGal eider -?•
Q _ = 16
'PROJECT LIMITJS ---?-i
__-
Freedam
Park ??.
??4b
M ?Q
D
AR 0 .7 20o5
I'?AD?ApyD.Sr,RQUAUh
Bltjr?
LAIb IINU tlLNCHMAKK y
9 BOULDER SILL FOR CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
EXISTING STREAM GAGE 8

mmcz CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE WITH CROSS VANE
Q EXISTING BOULDER

O EXISTING BEDROCK CROSS VANE
0 EXISTING TREE DOUBLE WING DEFLECTOR
60AEED?
LOCATION MAP
NOTES;
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING
ELEVATION BENCHMARKS NEAR WORK AREAS TO ALLOW FOR
GRADES TO BE CHECKED BY DESIGNER.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC, PLANIMETRIC, AND PARCEL DATA COMPILED
FROM AVAILABLE MECKLENBURG COUNTY FILES. UTILITY
LOCATIONS WERE SURVEYED IN THE FIELD TO THE EXTENT
POSSIBLE BY BUCK ENGINEERING IN OCTOBER 2004,
BUT MAPPING MAY NOT FULLY DESCRIBE ABOVE GROUND
AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
PREPARED FOR
+ Cfc3-Wj??l?dbrWug
BUCK PROJECT REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
143C P1
/ PROJECT MOINEEA
EEG
AP BY
ADB
DATE
02/10/2005
MERCY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION II/
•? 1000 S KINGS DRIVE un n>mq pm a au1 Iro
1!S??YY `YY?_ ?N ? Ovbltt NwtM1 Catl'm 7810!
I YY1..•iii G fa pP.- 701-33-115/
N GI N EE RINt 701-33-4492
ABC HOARD MECKLENBURG COUNTY J
1426 E MOREHEAD STREET
STA 10+70 TO 12+70 S I THE CHARLOTTE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
200 LF GABION REPAIR, ; MECKLENBURG
0 Ce SEE 3 \ 1012 S KINGS DRIVE
4
BM aP / ` STORM VAULT
/ LSUG26 15" RCP
5 l
ELEV 31.19 / - 36" RCP RIM 624.55 x xx _ x x
/ \INV 625.49 INV EAST 617.05 \\
?s INV WEST,616.08/ , PROPOSEp CONSTRUCTION
18" CMP 1. ACCESS AND STAGING`AREA
?- -63U BM ;- 3 I
LSUG25
10. q 15" ELM 14" ISHI E f? ELEV 619.16 \
24. RCP OA u PNU jiw' V 6" CMP
?1NV 625.73; -
oN? - - INV 625.59
ELEV
1/i _ gnu ? --?--?_ CONCRETE
o- FLUME
MECKLENBURGE COUNTY oHl P -
oHN, ? 0" MALE o 6" M PLE
?s OHO MOREHEAD STREET u o
Ou ??1 pl oHU oHU ' - _ 6° CMP 12" RCP
/ u IN22.20 SUGAR
o TTLE ?I r ° I -? N CONCRETE GAG
24'{4? mow CREEK ? 5_06 INV 622.08
?- 14" TRP 0 _ FLUV?E
OHU 628.28 .48
TREE 6`CSIP _
oHU `- osu. _ ~? 1 n T _ _ wall' 7S MECKLENBURG C TY
oHU 1 s
_ o . INV 625
OHU S? oyu 7 "?'1" H?UNSVJCK AVENU
04 'L ..
60" RCP" u/_ {?ti?;!'7?7" •z'*+9?'?-??
INV 622.95 ` s
-- -` _-? \_- -
J
oHU Aoku ? ° ? '12° PVC?1
\ oY \ SsGS GAGE SS n STORM MH
\ u \oH oHu \ ASS RIM?631.34' r`J oL 6r'w3 t e"
u V oHU ss -- ? -4" PVC INV a 3? 6
0% SA I T MH ss
o _
Y H 1 -r `
R M2 632.48 48" ss ss - Ss ' R MT 6.33 .76 ?' 'TAR
RIM 6,33°f --?.
HTHE CHARLOTTE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY / Ss. \? Ss \ y 618.76 48
MECKLENBURG PROTECT EXISTING STORM VAULT 12? ss ?? 'Y all 1
1416 E MOREHEAD STREET RIM TRAIL AND GABIONS -Gas k
4" PVC 628.68 CAS AiS _
INV 619.11 INV WEST 616.58
INV EAST 615.89 'G>
INV SOUTH 619.46
N TH-619d1----
\ ST?Rlvl VAULT
_
N RIM?6293D
NV EAST 615.05\,
\ ???J PRO / a NV WEST 615.80 \
/ / E Boy O
\ / ?NIf i +
LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
/ LIZ HAIR NATURE WALK
\ NOTE: 30 30 60
?L rolect\?0143C\Des? Plon?? In ts dw ., PROTECT ALL EYJSTINC TREES UNLESS SITE PLAN
\ OTHERMSE NOTED, SEE LANDSCAPE
g Feb 10 2005 T PLANS BY COLE JENEST k STONE. SCALE (FT)
\ I f I - ' _ BUCK PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
143C
PROJECT ENGINEER
EEG
? E G
i
r
I I 0J
' I I I Q{ y?`? APPROVED BY
I I?c;ADB
1 I I ? 7 I I I Q??FG?
I DATE
UTHORITY I t I ?G 02/10/2005
i I
B U C u.C 1117Hra"9 Pw-1,114110
' aowul, - c , 25204
THE CHARLOTTE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY-- I I I P ?. 71/ 1-1-4414
E 2: GIN EE HIND sec -7J4-4192
I)i i MECKLENBURG
I 1100 S KINGS DRIVE I I
BM
i
LSUG24 STA 18+82 TO STA 19+73 I ?I w w I \ I
ELEV 631.42 NO WORK IN CHANNEL a ?? I \ I
I ° zO w
I C,
WKOOf 0
Of -Z
„ CMP 12" RCP 2? p J
USGSGAGE X Q^ YY ??z wnw0 I ¢°Qp I Q
1Ny1506 INV 622.08 CONCRETE N
JI ?" x ? I Q n ?YY 1 NZp2 ?? Eo?a:
CNFFLUME I, PROPOSED I w a? Q
??°y ~m
TY _ -? _ CONSTRUCTION / Io Q n } °
NV 625.48 'Gv__ ?--?- I ACCESS AND W w aN? ?n}a ^ n I z=z
STAGING AREA PVC11 '_ I 2'17 ` I w^??
TOP GAGE INV 68.64 12--R BIRCH 21 I ?J? I ' Y? e Q o
4" PIPE 5 RC ?o - 5:ynu buu/ oHU - oNU Na j a
INV 75_74 N INV 613.3 6 ° ' t? ° 12" HICKORY !_ ..-II I r oHU i pyul - I p -o
10" SUCH MAPLE x ,I I _ _ oHU oHU
_ 36" ELM
x 1.' MAPLE STA 23+6 0 STA-24+1 °yu
-? - `~ NO WORK IN CHANNEL - o u
76 48'x` 8" RCP T $ -- S\U I x ROTECT EXISTING ` ` _ ' - \ oHu
INV 615.D 2" PVC ` GAR CR'-`??-'? MECKLENBURG COUNTY ? ANITARY SE
ogs WER.
BRUNSWEt? AVENUE L O NOT DRIVE EQUIPMENT 0 R SEWER.
?qes I INV 61'5 67
INSTALL SAFETY- FENCE OVER CHANNEL
cns
WATER
STORM VAULT
GAGE SS °5?S v o, O ° _ _
34_.RCP 4" PIPE CgS1 ER -`
`
RIM T29:30 INV 613.8 XIST CB ?? grER 15' RCP 12 RCr
48" RCP --26±00
INV EAST 615.05.
R ?R?? - -- ,-
r- INV HEST 615.80 cAS_?rbT R-_ haR ?_? x' _
8" RCP ?R 620.76
NV NORTH 622.55 ---
INV SOUTH 8? S? 7'R? ERA _
§2IL77? STORM MH A s° q x
y `, ARM G25`8D BLYT 7 - WATER-_
INV WEST 616..70' E DOULBM D s oT WA RR
--__? INV EAST 615.43 S v TAIiY M ?6ST SWAT-,R-,
rNal
--A PROXIMATEJOCATION RIM 627.59 48" SST DATER Kq ER
10" SANITARY CROS3INC? _ INV 619.69 ssr wS K,gTER
AUTHORITY-CHARLOTTE \ ?? 5sr ?7?TE
MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL CB
1000 S BLYTHE BV w\ RIM 617.54 STA 25+70 TO STA 2fi
INV NEST 622.08 50 LF GABION REPAIR
INV EAST 614.53 +
L0 24" RCP 7
H 616.46
\ INV NV 613.32 /
J
w
Q
Parking DeCl J I
C) 7
Q LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
\ I .? / 1 \ LIZ HAIR NATURE WALK
NOTE: 30 0 30 60
I PRO ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS 1111111 01 ?- I 0 WISE NOTED; SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
rojects\0143C\Design s\PI shee s. wg Feb 10, 2005 ? -PLANS BY,COLE JENEST k STONE SCALE (FT)
_ BUCK PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
143C P3
I _ \ PROJECT ENGINEER
\??p? EEG
APPROVED BY
ADB
DATE
1 \ ?? 02/10/2005
I I I I ?J??. I I®Y CEZ rnanou., Nan, came leis
I 1 I I I ? I vna? Ia-l31-NSA
I I I I 1 ?? /\ ? "? 4:NGINEERING (cr 70l-1M-119t
I I __
I I -
I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I
`\ 1 I I 1 I I 1 ?I I 1
I a I ? 1 I I 1 1 ? 1 ' f 1 'I I
2V1? W ? I V \1---J-. I 9
°° I -_ _ ,- I 1 I 1
uza0 i ?
I ?Y.JY ? }UQ(9 ? I';. ? ? I ? ? I ?.•I I I ? I -.
1 !`f/1?N I I-2=Z I 1 ?KKZI ? I I; •.?? j ??.• ?? f\\ ? I
z ?Rl UYC9Y I Z°Wp?pl YO'. ' O? I v/ \ ?/.. I
L'i ti i ?aQp I I UU ZUp? ,I W° 1 a° ??il I? I n? 1
I Y
I .0 Q?p2U -2.1' 2U Z 1 WIr ' I\f Ir. I `? I
\ I N^p.- I 1 c)YQ Y2Y I„ Oz I I I
?n Y Y
°p I W Co OI In I fif I c? I
OHU W I KpU W 1 UIn (O2 I 1 \
} 2La fl,
U
p c"I
I 04U - I? ? 1 ? 1 ^O^?^I ? ?? ?m I EY I °
Li I
Z 00 (D
1 _- i a 1 \ 1 mY wz
__ GNU 1 1 I } (n Q Y I m U I I Q I ?\
\7
OVER SEWER. -4- Of
CHU_ u m °v 1 C3 m? w°
R CTiANNEL U '- o
?_ OHU a
U
I ^ I I Z I U I C9
z
oHU W^ z 0 I Y LLI I a z _z
\J \ CHU
o I BM J= oHU? 1 Z °^ / ?o I ? zY_ zY
LSUG23 - - N J (o
ELEV r a
/ LSUG 616.29 GAB ON REPAIR l?
E?p_= _ ^_ & r XYNG- GRIFFIN GRIFFIN PROP LLC PROTECT
1160 S KINGS DR UNDERGROUND UTILITY -I- V
r?"? ?? T7T- - ?• \ PLACES EEL-PLATS IN CHANNEL I-
OVE EXISTING
??- BED FOR EQUIPMENT CROSSING- BOULDERS FROM i Q I
-.? - .! +00 \ - f? STA 32+55 TO
- -? - `` -STA -3
R rwal 6" ELK!
0- us Nall
4STE ?- -
"? --- -_ -
STA 25+70 TO STA 26 41, ? ,,, fir' rEe?waTSP ?-_ ??- - _0-
O u°? I f ??ucFR CONSTRUCTION LITTLE SUGAR CRE 32+00
50 LF GABION REPAIR aHU oHU T - ACCESS
CHU U r 3D" Ml Y, TLE _-? - 33 0p " , ^? \
"?.. 12" CMP
24" RCP STORM MH Pozi? ss , ?.
HDW 616.46 ' u T G Ss? I NV 623.10 - -- - -
RIM 624.52 12
NV 613.32 WILLOW
OAK "U 12• 1M1"L 19 '4W?Tf s
Q 36" RCP S W uG - -JET y" 11RT UCT _ 24" PINE
NV 616.71 OAK 12" BVLLOW
OAK S t uGi 1 --_``` UTT1E
ss
15 RC ss 110T J_ UGT
OUTLET COVERED 24" PINE _ ss ss ucT UCT
Z BY DEBRIS ss °cr ?-
J / ss
?sss
SANITARY MH
RIM 626.59
U / INV 614.09 48"
Q T
RIl
/ IN
AUTHORITY- -- MECK ENBURG CHARLOTTE
1200 S BLYTHE BV LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
1300 BLYTHE BV LIZ HAIR NATURE WALK
NOTE: 30 0 30 60
PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS SITE PLAN
OTHERWISE NOTED; SEE LANDSCAPE
L: \Pr jects\0143C\Des'gn Plans\Plansheets dwg Feb 10, 2005 PLANS BY COLE JENEST do STONE SCALE FT

I I

I ?

I
I
I

j I

j I ?

I
,
I
-

630.._
w ? I O
L7 ?
? i
Ln
o p ! j I -?-
i
W
U

-
U --

i I
° Q - -- -
-
Q
a
+
o° rwa
Nx
z
z
w
1 0
ow ; W
(n omm
I
I i
620

I II I I I i i ' j i =

--I
?". I I I ! ! I ?? i i' j f-

_ + o- \

II
?I
j
••
•/•
'•
'
'ti ?t C)
N ?
'
--
_?
•
'
v
> II l \ /. ! II II M \ / • N \ ?? n _.
N W F- J Q w •••• II II II
S S (n
S W
S N
0•
co N
N
N ''i VI W Q
F- W
J. N O
O
Q >
J
a >
J
N
Q >
W
a-
610 a a ° + j S S m W a N F
- N ? W
j a s > S
s >
a S
d ? 10 a s
II I II II
Q J
W II
1
l Q W I I, !
N

a i N W W
J
w
S
a i S
a S
s
>
---- - - - j S CL

I i
i
!
I
j i
I
?
I
i

00; ----
I
I

--- I ?

I

-_- I

.-
- I

?

...
I

! I

I

N N N
N
N V
r.
M'N N'fV
Col n'?
M'(O
'
N V
n n
M
N N
m
L h
<
m ?
O'?
of

N
n (3)
N N -

?D --

a1
NID

?t?M

aN
?
?

N-It

NN

NN '

M V N
N

4
Mm
?2 N
mN
M?
N?
MM

M.
b
t
tD,,D t0 t0 t0 t0 c0 t0 c0.10
1 ?0 ^ t0 ,0 tD c0 tD 10 ?D N'ID 10 (D tD ,D ,D10 ,D N
10+00 11+00 12+00--- 13+00 ---- -- --- - - 14+00 ---- - I---_ _ 15+00 -- -= ---- 16+00 -- __ -? - --- - 17+00
- ---
LEGEND
L: \Projects\0143C\Design \Plans\Profile.dwg Feb 10, 2005
----- EXISTING THALWEG
-•.-••- PROPOSED THALWEG
APPROXIMATE BANKFULL
3 0 3 6
VERTICAL SCALE (FT)
30 0 30 60
HORIZONTAL SCALE (FT)
BUCK PROJECT REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
143C P7

•
G p? PROJECT ENGINEER
EEG
o??J
? APPROVED BY
ADI3
Q
?
p DATE

5
02/10/200
wq,?
1717 Ha
Enq Ploy Sulb f 00
B U
f?/ r EtJ? rn?ev., w?.n caama tezw
Pnom: 7w-731-u5{
I ? _ i F.NGINF};ry ING fas ]w-771-1491
W I I

lV m 1

- Q.
630 +
m? I z?

O -
c/) - N
° W
N 0/?3
LL -
In
-

L

J ow
F- z
U
+-J
O a

U

J U
a
W?-j
U
UI /
-
z O
In

-
4W
- W
?
J
J
u
z
a -
N? Z _._ _ Z N
V/ V x
U a
x aW
°
{n a
x
Q
z

-
W

-1

-

?
Nf

o

+ _
Y

i

?
z
cc
3
a

°
?

04
i
U1

W
620 - z z -- - _ - -Z -
o a 0 O
D-- z ao) z J
I

II

o
+ r-

••

' + r": co
Lc)

• -Bo

`f Lr) CN
> t of
II
'
0 M
O ? •? N M + \ ? +
M N
+ M T-
+ --
N to O
+ _M

> 1
II
1
N
- - ;
-,
N
O

6
W
6
10 v
N > N II II O p II II II II II II O O
1
S
d X
>>
II N J
W a W
N W M
+ F
Ill J
W a W
I
J +
N
'.
< >
J
>
a W
f >
J
a >
W
M
+
0- d
a S
w a S
I
a a- O
N U
II
a
s n
N W
>>
a s N
II O
II N
> W
> a W
Fn W r J
rn W In
> W
>
N
D_
W
l N O
II

in Li >
w
a >
w a s >>
a s >>
a s a s a
a >
w
> < w W
n J
W
CL N > S > > >

600

(S
30
]]
r_
IM O1M
10c0 O7iM NN
Oi0 01c, NIO
00 OIO M Ol
N:U] MIN
tDf, V7101 NIF?
MIN M'[0 N
d M OCO 7f0
F?V O?'Ol l0 U7
WD] .- V
AIM ID (D
ma N
N
T

a MIM M':,N
m ?I? VIO
?i? <?i0 M N
(oi(o MIS
ml o M'.M
m?O MGM M'N
?II'D _M '-
(Di w N'M N'..N
(Dto m!n NIN
?i? _MIM
?'e N N
IO N
c
o
16+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
LEGEND
3 0 3 6
- ---- EXISTING THALWEG 1 i LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
VERTI CAL SCALE ( FT) LIZ HAIR NATU RE WALK
PROPOSED THALWEG 30 30 60

L: \Projects\0143C\Design\Plans\Profile.dwg Feb 10, 2005 APPROXIMATE BANKFULL
HORIZONTAL SCALE (FT) PROFILE
i
n
O
u 1
-If) 630
N
Q
V)
-LEJ
Z_
J
I
U
i
620
BUCK PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
143C P8
PROJECT ENGINEER
G ??
h EEG
o?
J
y
APPROVED
BY
ADIB

DATE
02110/200
5
'w
N -!c
d a.i
a
-
>
I
a
-
e
BUCK
70{-7J{-NX
ENCINEEHINC PF
711
? f
7
TT
V ? -
ac 0t-
-N9I
(
LL
O

M

Q

W
Z
J

Q

j -A --- •?? ? ? ? b-? _ ??c ?,.
r + M \ ••
• N + N\ '/•
• ul l ./,• no N a n
•
N ID to
N to •' ?.. ?'' • co
N ?D N ID r'/ +
m I
N D O
n ,
/
' + N?
" (V
\ ?. ,?
I -

- 610
11
cD
/
M 7,
"
?
/
1-1

>
J
In w
> N
h- J
w N
O

°
> >
k J N J co
v w
w N
m
0
° I; it

Q W

Q W

O

O

> 1>
J
Q

I(7

l0

>>
a s

a s II

II v
II
? d d d

It > m w

5 a
a In w
5; _
>
a s +

"? D1
o
10 r
Vl
S u
?]I w
w w
S S
>
+
n C-4
D'
10
Q w F w It p a a
I a II II
v~ w to w a w
a
w
- a s a s m w N Lu -
S
EL C_
a S 5
a a
- 600
rn'm (Do n o •'10 a) !(I 01Im MI rl (o! o IoIN MIo r- O n ml, Ln NI(D (G
'
I
' N
O •-i0 C?N alr7 ?D'IO Vim m.,m Vi
NAM N.O N.- NIN M'.N N1
N N! m 7
O N ? M
ID O,n nB) D)
N na M
,O r
N NIN N?.? .-m l ? NIN 0 0
.-
: i
D m?lo mlm to im t0i,10 loilo LDim mlt D p p N ID lDiLo mlD IDIID GIG m'.Ip ID "D
26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33 00
LEGEND
L•\Projects\0143C\Design\Plans\Profile.dwg Feb 10, 2005
3 0 3 6
- - - - - EXISTING THALWEG 111111110--,- 1 LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
VERTICAL SCALE (FT) LIZ HAIR NATURE WALK
PROPOSED THALWEG 30 0 30 60
PROFILE
APPROXIMATE BANKFULL
HORIZONTAL SCALE (FT)

- _00 O
n

I
( O
+
? - -
- - 630

Q
I

W j -
_ LLJ
J
? J
= I i I

N
- -< 620L--F-0R-GRADE-P-OINTS-SHOW -

IN PROFILE WITHOUT STRUCTURES IN Q
PLAN VIEW, USE ON-SITE ALLUVIUM ?
EXCAVATED FROM POOLS TO
FORM RIFFLE SLOPES.

i
i I
i
I
I
I
I

N a m ° -''--- Imo' s - ?,,-
0 'D

L

°
610 * 7
-
- I 1
II II I II II II II (o + O +
r N
O + co
+ 't

w

N

w o

+ o

m II II

>

n

c;
DO

p
?Q
t' 'D
! N
6 ¢ w 2
w
I
Q
w
II
II In o
r II
11 o
N
co
a Li
s
a w +
a O
p H
S w
> N
> w
w 17
II O
O
II N
S w
S
'n >+
M co
a j II
J II I
w ( ¢ II
w
l II a i a w I a s N w II II En Q
L N
II II m
w
w
w r I
w w 1 a a Q a
? a
d J a CL
S a s I n w w
S a
a
I i I

I

I S
a S
a S
n
-

~ 600;

MIN SIN mr

1

cDN

N

?',?

N

N

'a

N10

0'Ot

N

N
1

.

_

1
01 O a.N 10
?
101r NtO
OIiN

? Na
OI

01'
L

17

cc)

cON
o
N

N

r

o
17 N,a 7IN
0
OI?N CIO yip
a

SIN
p7

7i•-

Ilo

=

I

L

1,6 0110 Oj

OIO
01`O

l
0'
o
0 10'10 1? ID t0.1p (DIID ?i(D (0.In IO ID n' IO tD ID 10'1D f0, (0 10 t0 lD 10 '10
tD N 10
33 00 34+00 35+OD 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00
L:\Projects\0143C\Design\Plons\Profile.dwg Feb 10, 2005
LEGEND 3 36
----- EXISTING THALWEG VERTICAL SCALE (Fr)
-.._.•- PROPOSED THALWEG 30 30 60
APPROXIMATE BANKFULL HORIZONTAL SCALE (FT)
O
W
0
O
Q:
a
0
z
w
LEGEND
L: \Projects\0143C\Design\Plcns
Feb 10, 2005
3 D
----- EXISTING THALWEG VERTICAL L S SCALE (FT)
(FT)
-•.-.•- PROPOSED THALWEG 30 0 30 60
APPROXIMATE BANKFULL HORIZONTAL SCALE (FT)
slldl3a
>nVAA J?jnlVN 6VH Zn
>iiii?jo dons 3llln
x008 ll1 a3 d W8Y
830V3H NOON

(N3AOM-NON) O189VJ
8311U Z 3dA1 ?a31004 3NOIS L SSY"0
3NOIS V SSV10
NO11tlA313
_ - -l-'?- 038 nV381S
N018tl0 k ?;< MOU
30 d01 M0139 ,SZ'0 r'
,
v
01 SXOOa
1115 3dOlS --

13111
NI.
7
30 d01
0
"
", J0 d01
X39
MOl.13Stl9
7
J?JNNYBT-
--
XNV8 JO d01 NNYB JO d01
M NY
',z x f x ,41s'13l 1Y 313 ISM s11301noe
31oN
x008 83100) SNVld NO
NMOHS 3a3HM
XNY9 O1N1 0311 831Sn1J a301n09
NOON !Sale
1
I 1 ro
1
O O
tl
Y r
r
I r

$ SMO08
N33ML39 I I
(N3AOM-NON) SdVO ON 1 I
3189VJ 831113 Z 3dA1` ? MnMINM ,9---1_ I 1
NOON 83100 I I
4
(rvnNnllV) 318800
`"'
ONY 1311'1
l
?>vy
80 JO d
%IM 030Va0 113M

x008 a3.V3H
(
Y 311S-NO) NNY8 JO d01
nuNove
l1LIN0tl8 m
D
z NY1 S
c '31JJIa JO
,a?

y
N H10N31

r
038 MV381S ONUSIX3 m
NOSJ 1110 1V1831VM MO11
3S8VOJ 0NV rvnAnrn
Six LO
801031330 ONIM 318f100 ?'
- - - - -
,,??65335 ?3i0 d8a
5830100/1 1N30tlf0'1 M0138 ,4 01 Z

030YId 38 llVHS 8301n0e 831N30
J,VMN", WnW;NIW 9

100d -{WnWIN!M ,9I-

OINGY
1
3I NON03 0N951X3 JO OV3H J 831
11
,Zl Ol 3p119

3NOIS I ONY '8 'Y
SSYO S1aYd 1Vn03

J
ll n4xNtl8
SS3NNOIHI lYN!MON ,9l 3'7 {018
31aY3H
40
XNVB 30 d01 xNYB JO d0! -
038 M0130 Jr 01 ,Z 0318338
39 llVHS Sa301n08
.lYMx1tlM
213SONOO ONUSIX3
YNV8 30 d01
Six LO
-did iO al No0 z
Suo d\ublsa0\O£q
11V130 33S
'11YM N019V0 O1N1 Ti
SWAY 38moneiS 383HM
3003
13003
l3NNVH3 !V SNOIeVO
AYMx1YM
?31380NOO ONLLSIX3
NNY9 JO d01
?s
' `"1x008 a31VY3 -•?
3 f/1-t-0 f/l-?f?-0 C/l
0 - -
71,A-" Y
3003
13NNYHO 1V SNOI8Y3
XNVB JO d01
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
wod MOM 3Hl n mi 3141 Ja I UVA313 3141 a1 "MN MM"
H W 03RD 38 TM6 3WID u S 318 JO 3% R aiSdn 3HL '=Yld x338 WH 3x IS TTV a3LN v - - - - - - - - - -
9 0
.1 ssru 3X015 W 306 MY3tl sdn IO S o Tu ai O 38 mHS 0 V /t 01 M
dV8 dW r sm3 sx3aNn8 Jo 308 -3.sS 31 S TL 01 omn 38 -HS -a d t SSY10 'L
10803,4 SA33 N PCWCKOtl IVIWH e J rood e1OOS N =W 381YM 838 rlLLp W '1
OL
ap
J
,U"WUS 3d 0W YtlW OWOTOJ MIM Srd7 38 TVI6 3N onajS v S4 11 1
SWe (d01) d3" xOM MY 1Sb 03JVld 38 TTVHS Sx d 831WJ
7AMV MV3ais OW MW 341 x33LL38'RW 3WA J3 3as Mv3usdn 3141 NO SNOISN3MI0 36n1Ond1S
=YW 38 TT TL S=d BLWJ 8L 038 3H1 x0118 a31VAV00 38 TM -I V T
'1333 X5 JO MR V !OJ
RV3&Sd 4ll 0W 1008 BLOOJ M01108 3141 JO FUM 3Hl W O WW O/31X3
- OW S=d 83aV3H 3HL A 31MA 3111 IOU =VlSN 38 TTVHS 0WVJ v31VJ 2
,L X S J J LSV3l IV 38 LSnM SR10VO8 T
I- -.-, - --
26H-IGC-,p( yoJ ?r`
3
1
N/t M?
7?
3 d
N?
0/
N'
I3?
8

,ozaz wR.3 aNx '.aoww
?^
".
1
j?
r
'
?
8
}
?
,
5002/0l ZO
01-
3lva y
a

eav od
Aa 03Ao8ddV 5?

C,
933
833NION3 1J3f'08d
L0 ON
'ON 133HS 'ON 3ON383d38 I03r08d lane
,8=9 A7w-j7 bbd
(N3AOM-NON) 0180'14 x008
MMILl Z 3&111 83100.1
X018'10 ?-
J0 d01 M0139 SZO ` L
01 SXOO8 MIS 3dOlS ,
NOON
830Y3H
SOOZ 'OL 9a3 6Mp'S
3NOIS I SSY10
3NOLS V SSY10
N011YA313
038 rvV3a15 'NIM ,ZX.CX,4 '83a1nOo- MnrvIN!M ,9
MnNn1lY 3LI5-N
M /
(?i3?
;; (N3AOM-NON)
0188'10
y 831114 Z 3dA1
tl V
I
-{ NIM
f t'I~ 3X015

\ ,
039 13NNYHJ V SSYIO
AYMx1YM 3NOIS ! SSY1J
313SONO0 J0 d01
N018YO 30 d01 six LO
NVA SS080 L
NNY13 JO d01
1
311J0Oad s83alnoe
83d 031VAtl%3 N33V138 SdVO ON
38 01 100d?
I 1
1
11 I I I
II 'r
I
I J Y'. 11 III:;
30VIS llnJNN'V9 Z/L_,r
1NIOd
NOUVA313
1 ? ? I
1 I1 `'Y f
?o
f
11Y130 33S
'il'1M NOI9Y0 O1NI 311
Srv8V 3anL0n81S 383HM
1
Sooa 'OL 9a3 6Mp•sgo}a0\s
I I ?
rvnNINIY1 .1,
HONINI% .9.1 SN018V0
9NUSIX3
A
31380NO
3a0N0O ON;15IX3
3NOIS L SSY1O
N019YO RUM 'numovB
AVMNIYM,_/
313NONOD ONUSIX3 NO18V9 d0 d01 M0130 ,SZ'0
01 SNOOK 1115 3dOlS M-dw-R97a
('
l0\SlOafaad\:-
I
r1 ?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
t i
3dOlS 40 301 lY HON381 01
030N3LX3 38 01 ONILIVN 1 r. , 1 1 1
10a1NOO NOIS083 r--` r r r 1 1- 3dO1S
1 ro to i N wo ?w vl 1 r 1 1 r 1 1 1 d0 301
1 / 1 1 / 1 /
Noe of aw7aNi ro r. ? N 090 wG. 971
n SS nx ?'? (dAl) 3MV1 ?. 1 1 1 1 1. 1 f
f w or3?
ro wte Noon weNn 971 1 1 - 1 'r r r 1 1 NNYANY3a1S
aNasN3ea a+.,oma NNtlArvV3a1S 30 d01 , 1 1 1 r % 1 -1 30 d01
a301n08 a3100d } I xn m w3NO ° 3a 40s3i ii o?a" FgN3a1 N3a1
M3A
3AaIS N l OTdzI
J^
L
313aON0O 0NI151%3 I Q31OYdN0O ONV 031113N0V8
z 13NNYHO JO NOllO a301n08 a3OY3H
'03NV1S 'HON3a1 d330 HONI 9 NI 030V1d
IIYM NOIBV9 9NI15i%3 38 l1YHS ONIIIYN lOa1NOO NOISOa3
I 3dOlS d0 Z301)
NNYONY3a1S d0 d01
'N83llYd 3dYHS ONONVIO V NI 033V1d 38 l1YHS SDIVIS ONOIVN T 031OVdN03 ONY 03i113NOV8
'SNOIIVON3rvN003a 83afIlOYdnNtlN Ol ONIO8000Y '03XVIS 'HON3a1 d330 HONI 9 NI 030Y1d
03ddYl83AO ONY 030V1d 38 T1YHS ONU.LVN 10a1NOO NOIS083 'Z 38 l1VHS ONOIVN 10a1N0O NOIS083
'ONalYN JO 1NDUOYld 01 a018d 03033S 38 i1VHS SNNYS l
SIN Z S3I'6R uN Z
N019VO 01 NI-311 WaV 38nlona s Z I ONLUVYV OalNO NOIS a
(13) 31VOS '3NOlS 2? 1S3N3f 3100 kg SNVId 3dVOSONVI
L- I HIM 30NVC18000V NI 'Sa3H10 kO 03AaOJ(23d 30 01
Ot 5 0 S N0I1V1303A NVINVdId 30 ONI1NVld HNVO IVN011100V
:310N
MOld3SV
N011Ofla1SNOO ONI?jna
038afllSlO SXNVS 383RA
ON111VN 10a1NOO NOIS083?
NOI1V1303A
ONIISIX3
0aVA31f108
3HIA1S
-\--------- ----I
30ViS
11f(jXNVS
31VhIXOdddV
31VOS OlHdVaO 333
N011:D3S Id01d ki
NIVA3a 01
NOISVO ONIISIX3
NIVN3a Ol llVal
---;7 303 JONOO ONIISIX3

(dAl) NOLIV1303A
d0 d01
SOOT `Ot qaj bmp•uoi#oaS\Suold\UbIS30\02410\sloafojd\:1