350035_PERMIT FILE_20171231

I
DANIELS FARM 869 Rommie Daniel Road ._
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
F,MM
September 14, 2000
W
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1628 Vr�
Dear Mr. Schuster.
Subject: Notice of Violation
A.C.Daniels Farm ,AWS350035, Franklin County
Enclose is spread sheet that I will keep and update weekly of the lagoon freeboard levels.
The freeboard on August 9,'2000 was 20 inches, you suggestion I start land application to prevent the
possibility of lagoon overflows. There only being two days since that it was not rain or to wet to
application. Will you give me permission to pump under this wet condition, or do I way until it dry?
Wrtr
My facility was stuck by lightning and there are no animals on site at this time. It will take about
a year to build back or sell the property. We have not decided which one to do. I do not want to close
my lagoon until we have a change to sell it.
Sincerely,
Allen C. Daniels

I
DATE ILAGOON FREEBOARD LEVELS I HAY CUT
8/24/00
22 IN
9/l /00
24 IN
9/8/00
27 IN
9115/00
321N
9/22/00
10/6100
10/13/00
10/20/00
10/27/00
11 /3/00
11 /10/00
11/17/00
11/24/00
12/1 /00
12/8/00
12/15/00
12/22/00
12/29/00

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
919/571-4700
/File Access Record
SECTION
TIME/DATE
NAME
REPRESENTING: C L. C- ---- --- --
Guidelines for Access: The staff of thy: Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read„ carefully the following
guidelines before signing the form;
1. We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an -appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision Is available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
FACILITY NAME
1. C "...,
2.
3-
4.
A
Signature and Name of Firm/Business Date
Pima awch a business Wrd to Olt form
COUNTY
Time In Time Out

O�O� W A
0
Allen C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Dear Mr. Daniels:
North Carolina Department of
x t-
February 27, 2006
Subject: Permit Rescission
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
anment and Natural Resources
Permit No. AWS350035
A.C. Daniels Farm
Franklin County
W. Klimek, P.E. Director
)ivision of Water Quality
Thank you for submitting the Lagoon Closure Form. Permit number AWS350035 has been
rescinded because all lagoons on your facility have been closed. You should no longer be billed
the annual permit fee, but, if you continue to receive invoices, please contact Todd A. Bennett at
[phone].
Sincerely,
laul,Sherman
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fran McPherson
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
APS Central Files
NNo `hCarolina
aturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1636 Mail Service Center i Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone].623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

of North Carolina
fD01artment of Environment
',,arid Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 2, 2000
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816
4 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350035
A.C. Daniels Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Franklin County
Dear A.C. Daniels:
In accordance with your application received on February 9, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to A.C. Daniels, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the A.C. Daniels Farm, located in Franklin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 1000 Wean to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS350035
A.C. Daniels Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Don Friday at [phone] ext. 533.
r arr. V i
� H14R RALEIGH RF.G OVAL OFFICE'
Sincerely,
SerrT. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Franklin County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY RALEIGm REGIONAL OFFICE
February 14, 2000
Mr. A.C. Daniels
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Facility #F 35-35
A.C. Daniels Farm
Franklin County
Dear Mr, Daniels:
On December 3, 1999, Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's
efforts to determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not causing any adverse effects on
Waters of the State at the time of the inspection. However, a condition exists that requires your
attention to comply with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan for your facility.
No lagoon waste analysis was available to cover part of the annual spray application
period for June, July and August. A waste analysis must be taken within a period 60
days before or 60 days after spray application. This analysis must be done to comply
with the requirements in your Animal Waste Management Plan.
Please respond in writing to this office, within 30 days of receipt of this letter, outlining your
plans to correct the above conditions.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this inspection please call Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
8800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PNON8 a19-871-4700 FAX 818-67t-4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNIrV / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECTCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816
Dear A.C. Daniels:
e��
��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT'AND-NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
IAAf
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 3535
Franklin:County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR 1, UM2, DRY I, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR 1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% rezycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816
Dear A.C. Daniels:
AI
0 •
M�Ag��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
December 8, 1999,
p
r6
S�
't.
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 35-35
,Franklin-Cdunty.
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely, �Qd"'�
Oi .
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water.Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN_ RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816
Farm Number..35735S
Dear A.C. Daniels:
A 1,14
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 1, 1999
You are hereby notified that A.C. Daniels Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an. Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of.a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone] extension 364 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerel ,
c
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Ronnie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816
bear A.C. Daniels:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
FEB7 1998
...�.
DEHNR 'it,EIGH PFGIONAL OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
A.C. Daniels Farm
Facility Number: 35-35
Franklin County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to subnut. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge CompIiance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

DiN ision of Environmental Management
Aquatic Survey and Toxicology Unit
May 17, 1994
MEMORANDUM
To: Steve Tedder
Ken Eagleson
Greg Thorpe
Beth McGee
David Harding
Dave Holsinger
Judy Garrett
From: Jay Saubej ,
Through: Larry Ausley `e
Subject: Status: Daniels and Daniels Dairy Farm - Franklin County
At the request of the Water Quality Section Chief, the Intensive Survey Group has been conducting
water quality monitoring activities at the Daniels and Daniels Dairy Farm (D&D) in Franklin County.
The purpose of this sampling effort is to document improvements in water quality in the Tar River
downstream of the Daniels and Daniels Dairy Farm near Louisburg. The Daniels and Daniels operation
is in the process of moving a substantial herd of dairy cows off an intensive animal lounging area into a
total confinement operation. The animal confinement areas are being rapidly built and will be available
for use in the near future. Other BMP's are planned to reduce the runoff from the immediate area
currently being used for intensive lounging areas. However, as far as we can determine, there are no
planned activities to implement BMP's for the pasture areas.
As of this date six sampling episodes have been conducted. Five of these sine episodes were conducted
within a 30 day period according to the water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria. The sixth
sampling event was performed under rainfall conditions.
Attached you will find a copy of the study plan which shows the location of our monitoring sites. Also
attached you will find a summary of the results that have been obtained thus far which can be described
as a "before" BMP implementation situation. Please note that the location identified as Daniels and
Daniels tributary C is the primary conveyance to the Tar River which drains the area from the current
intensive animal lounging area. Tributary A drains D&D row crop fields and pasture lands as well as
some of the intensive lounging areas. Tributary B drains some of the intensive lounging area but is
normally dry. Tributary D, the southernmost stream on the D&D property, drains pasture land. During
our studies a number of cows have been observed on these pastures.
By reviewing the attached information you will note that Wolfpen Branch, located upstream of the D&D
operation, exceeded the water quality standard of 2001100ml with a geometric mean value of
2571100m1. The small tributaries draining the dairy farm were significantly in excess of the fecal
coliform standard with the highest values coming from the intensive animal lounging area
(tributary C) with a five sample geometric mean of 21,774/100ml and a maximum observed value of
seven million/100ml collected during a runoff event on May 2,1995. All of the individual samples
collected from Tributary C were far in excess of the 400/100ml water quality standard based on the 20%
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section

rule. Similar observations can be made based on the fecal coliform information collected from tributary
A and tributary D although at somewhat reduced concentrations. It is also important to note that all four
of the Tar River monitoring locations downstream of the D&D operation were within the 200/100ml
fecal coliform standard. This strongly suggests that the small amount of flow coming from the D&D
operation is being highly diluted by the Tar River.
Nutrient concentrations from the three monitored tributaries (A, C. and D) are all elevated well above
the Tar River levels. Please note that on March 22, 1995 tributary C, the intensive lounging area, had
NH3 concentrations of 19 mg/1 and total P of 25 mg/l. Although these tributaries contribute only a
small amount of flow to the Tar River, it is hoped that BMP's and construction activities to bring
Daniels and Daniels into a total confinement operation will reduce loading to the Tar River.
It is uncertain if the observations reported from this spring will be consistent with samples to be
collected under summertime low flow conditions. It is also uncertain if the management of cows on
Daniels and Daniels pasturelands will be modified. If you have any questions or wish to review a
number of photographs that have been collected please call me at 733-6510.
cc Danny Smith
Jim Fisher
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section

Tar R. at U.S. Hwy. 4oi at
Louisburg
Fox Cr. at Hwy. 56
Louisburg WWTP effluent
Sycamore Cr. at SR 1600
Tar R. upstream o1 Wollpen
Br.
Mouth o1 Wollpen Br.
UT beside Sand Pit at SR
1600
Tnb. A at Daniels Dalry Farm
Trio. B at Daniels Oairy Farm
Trio. C at Daniels Dalry Fart
Trib. 0 at Daniels Dairy Farm
Tar R. Of SR 1605
Cedar Cr. near mouth
Tar R. at SR 1001
Tar R. at SR 1609
Tar R. at SR 1611
.
o
-1
0
0
0
1
0
0
o
ca
Q
-y o
0
0
IN 11
�■1
■
■■111111
■mm��
INEIIIIIIIIE
�■n
MENI
gnu
nu
IMMIN
Comm

Station
Location
Date
Cond.
I Tot. Coli.
LFecajcon.
BOD5
NH3
TKN
NO2+NO3
Tot. P
(jAmhos)#/100m1
#1100m1
m 11
m 11
m /I
la 01
@25°C
1
Tar R. at U.S. Hwy. 401 at Louisburg
950322
81
240
80
1.3
950328
76
10
40
0.9
950330
86
1 60
20
0.6
950404
90
140
30
0.7
950406
90
50
43D
30
0.8
31 0
rain event
950502
98
2
Fox Cr. at Hwy. 56
950322
79
370
110
0.08
0.3
0.10
0.08
950328
75
40
270
0.05
0.3
0.08
0.06
950330
87
160
10
0.11
0.0
0.11
0.05
950404
86
220
40
0.16
0.3
0.10
0.09
950406
82
130
2,40'
50
0.07
0.6
0.06
0.04
N1,400
rain event
950502
78
3
Louisburo WWTP effluent
956322
359
4400
300
1.8
950328
367
1800 1
10
1.7
950330
375
70 1
30
1.6
950404
385
270
<10
0.3
950406
406
40
610
20
1.9
1 SD
rain event
950502
415
4
Sycamore Cr. at SR 1600
950322
87
700
ISO
0,08
0.3
0.08
0.05
950328
89
580
100
0.07
0.2
0.03
0.03
950330
91
580
ISO
0.12
0.5
0.06
0.03
956404
98
590
160
0.17
0.3
0.06
0.04
950406
95
<10
3,1 06
<10
0.08
0.4
<0.01
0.03
800
rain event
950502
1 0B
5
Tar R. upstream of Wolf en Br.
950322
85
370
70
0.07
0.3
0.17
0.08
950328
84
120
30
0.10
0.2
0.12
0.04
950630
85
180
20
0.11
0.2
0.11
0.04
950404
87
200
10
0.17
0.4
0.08
0.06
950406
105
170
6,2001
40
0,06
5.2
0.02
0.05
51:t7:
rain event
960502
94
6
Mouth of Wolf en Br.
960322
73
540
120
0.09
0.4
0.29
0.09
950328
73
480
120
0.09
0.4
0.30
0.07
950330
74
410
120
0.12
0.3
0.31
0.07
950404
74
810
360
0,16
0.4
0.29
0.10
950406
76 440 1,800
0.22
2.6
0.21
0.07
rain event
950502
72
7
UT beside Sand Pit at SR 1600
950322
79
950328
79
950330
78
950404
88
950406
82
rain event
950502
66
8A
Trib. A at Daniels Dairy Farm
950322
269
950328
160
950330
239
950404
233
950406
236
................
5,400
................
.650
5000
2000
0.08
0.3
0.93
0.05
2500
1200
0.06
0.4
1.20 -
0.05
1600
680
0.12
0.3
1.10
0.03
850
440
0.16
1.0
1.20
0.04
4,000
6,200
1,140
5,200
0.07
4.0
1.10
0,02
1,500,000
170.000
4.8
0.55
3.0
5.00
1.60
6,000
3,500
1.9
0.16
1.1
5.30
1.10
13,000
1,000
2.0
0.13
0.8
4.40
0.92
6,700
3,800
2.2
0.17
1.0
4.40
0.90
4,200
3,600
2.8
0.15
4.0
4.40
0.89
950502 471- 9.000.000 E16.600.000

Station
Location
Date
Cond.
Tot. Coli.
Fecal C013.
BOD5
NH3
TKN
NO2+N031
Tot. P
hos
#!loom{
#1100m1
m /I
m /I
m /I
me/I
m /I
25"C
8B
Trib. B at Daniels Dairy Farm
950322
CRY
950328
CRY
950330
CRY
950404
CRY
950406
CRY
950502
CRY
8C
Trib. C at Daniels Dai Farm
950322
840
1,000,000
640,000
86.0
19.00
35.0
9.90
25.00
950328
578
35.000
24,000
30.0
17.00
20.0
9,90
11.00
950330
488
13,000
13,000
1 10.0
4.60
1 8.3
14.00
1 8.50
950404
451
8,500
4,300
6.7
3.20
14.0
15.00
6.50
950406
394 6,400 5,700 4.8
2.50
4.4
15.00
6.40
rain event
950502
451
I
8D
ITrIb. D at Daniels Dairy Farm
950328
94
950330
141
950404
422
950406
85
950410
106
12,0601000
......................
7,000 000
300
100
2.3
0.14
0.8
0.84
0.35
12,000
13,000
6.0
1.70
4.0
0.79
0.59
610
310
3.1
0.24
0.8
0.67
0.35
400
220
2.5
0.15
0.7
0.88
0.30
460
280
3.0
0.15
1.0
0,67
0.35
96 19,000
20,000
I rain event
950502
9
ITar R. off SR 1605
950322
84
1,300
460
0.02
0.2
0.17
0.08
950328
84
160
40
0.08
0.2
0.17
0.06
I
950330
88
230
50
0.12
0.3
0.16
0.06
950404
80
200
40
0.16
015
0.14
0,08
950406
99 210
c ?till lt`:m
20
0.09
3.0
0.06
0.06
I
: r ' .......
rain event
950502
97
I
10
1Cedar Cr. near mouth
950322
82
950328
77
950330
84
950404
84
I
950406
85
rain event
950502
83
I
1 1 ITar
R. at SR 1001
950322
83
950328
85
950330
99
950404
89
950406
89
I
rain event
950502
96
12 ITar
R. at SR 1609
950322
82
950328
85
950330
86
I
950404
88
I
950406
90
80,000E
................
16,000
1,700
130
0.09
0.4
0.03
0.09
220
80
0.06
0.3
0.01
0.03
140
80
0,12
0.4
0.02
0.03
90
20
0.16
0.4
0.05
0.06
120
<10
0.08
0.3
<0.01
0.04
1,100
350
1,100
610
4.1
0.08
0.3
0,18
0,07
140
100
0.8
310
80
0.7
150
30
0.8
140
430
70
0.8
300
1,200
690
0.08
0.3
0.16
0.08
110
60
0.06
0.3
0.13
0.05
170
60
0.12
0.2
0.13
0.05
110
60
0.16
0.4
0.08
0.05
120
<10
0,07
0.3
0.01
0.04
94 410 10D
rain event
950502
13 ITar
R. at SR 1611
950322
82
.3,600
940
1.2
950328
81
230
80
0.9
I
950330
85
170
70
0.8
950404
89
150
60
1.0
950406
90
160
:......:..............
1 710
150
0.9
0.07
0,3
<0.01
0.04
.......:............
330
rain event
9505021
97

Study Plan
Daniels and Daniels Dairy
(Runoff from dairy farm entering the Tar River)
Subbasin - 030301
Purpose - Document improvements in water quality in the Tar River downstream of the
Daniels and Daniels Dairy Farm near Louisburg, as the farmer implements Best
Management Practices to alleviate runoff problems.
Facility - Daniels and Daniels Dairy Farm
Rt. 1 BOX 509
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
This farm has 1,350 dairy cows in 13 groups of 100 head each, that are milked 3 times. a
day. It also has approximately 450 acres of cropland and employs 41 people.
Location - Southeast of Louisburg off N.C. Hwy. 39, at the end of SR 1604. Dairy farm
located on the banks of the Tar River. See location map. or Topo Quad C 25 SE
Louisburg
Problem - Dairy farm runoff to the Tar River. 8-16-94 Notice of Violation
(Citizen's complaint)
Site'inspection 8-08-94 - Danny Smith of the RRO found animal lounging areas denuded
of vegetation, cattle waste in the creeks and ditches draining the property, and a lack of
cover crops had resulted in severe erosion problems.
RRO Recommendations
1) Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater.
2) Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharge
3) Develop an approved animal waste management plan.
Assistance - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
N.C. Cooperative Extension Service
NRCS Temporary Corrections - Fencing the livestock out of all drainageways and
i establishing minimum vegetative filter strips between the fence and the drainageways.
Continue to keep waste removed from the storage ponds as needed to prevent discharging
~f from overflow.
NRCS Long Term Corrections - A new waste storage pond, diversions, fencing, a
solids separator, dry stack storage facilities, livestock trails, and a waste irrigation system.
These components will be integrated with four new confinement barns with a recycle -
flush system.
Reinspection - 10-17-94 Danny Smith of the RRO reinspected the farm and noted
several stream crossings for cattle had been put in place and that a significant portion of
the drainage ditches (creeks) had been fenced off. Also, along one portion of a small UT
a few areas had been seeded in order to assist soil stabilization.

ESB Site Inspection - 1-30-95 Larry Ausley, Jay Sauber, and Jim Fisher of the Aquatic
Survey and Toxicology Unit toured the Daniels farm with the NRCS and the County
Extension Agent. -The Daniels Dairy farm is a very large operation with cows moving all
the time. Large denuded areas were noted on the farm which is situated on a hill
overlooking the Tar River. The most impacted areas include a bare 20 -30 acre lounging
area near the milking barns. The first in a series of two waste ponds was full of solids.
Initial efforts to correct the runoff problems were noted in new fencing and buffer strips
around the drainage areas. This situation will take some time to correct, and Mr.
Cameron Daniels said he was seeking financing to implement a waste management plan
developed.by the NRCS.
Staff also looked at the cropland areas of the farm and checked possible sampling sites
and access on the Tar River at the farm.- Staff toured the Louisburg WWTP and looked at
possible sampling sites on the River between Louisburg and Bunn. Staff conducted a
reconnaissance trip by boat to view the farm from the River and locate the tributaries
draining the Daniels Farm, for possible sampling sites. Because of deadfalls and debris
caught behind them, access by boat down river to the farm was not possible.
Sampling Sites (Proposed) Referenced to river miles from Hwy. 401 in Louisbourg
RM
1) Tar River at U.S Hwy 401 at Louisburg. (Franklin Co.) DEM Ambient Site
02081747
0
2) Fox Creek at Hwy. 56
0.5
3) Town of Louisburg WWTP effluent
0.6
4) Sycamore Creek at SR 1600
1.7
5) Tar River upstream of Wolfpen Branch
3.6
6) Mouth of Wolfpen Branch
3.6
7) UT beside Sand Pit at SR 1600
4.5
8) Tribs. from Daniels Dairy Farm - possible 4 sites -(8A, B,C, D) -1st trib.
5.5
9) Tar River in bend off of SR 1605
7.3
10) Mouth of Cedar Creek
8.9
11) Tar River at SR 1001 (Franklin Co.) near Bunn DEM Ambient Site
02081854
11.0
12) Tar River at SR 1609 (Franklin Co.) near Bunn
15.3
13) Tar River at SR 1611 (Franklin Co. )
17.8
Parameters
Field parameters (DO, Temp., Cond.) at all stations
Chemical parameters (NH3, TKN, NO2+NO3, Tot P) at all stations
Bacterial parameters (total coliform & fecal coliform) at all stations
Metals at Stations 1-3-11-13
Solids (TSS) at Stations 1-3-11-13
BOD5 at Stations 1-3-8(ABCD)-11-13
Frequency - After an initial sampling run data collections will include 5 consecutive
samples in a 30 day period to meet the coliform standards requirements. Otherwise,
sampling frequency will depend on the implementation of best management practices
(BMP) at the Daniels Dairy Farm.
Related Water Quality Issue - Reclassification of the Tar River to WS-IV for a
proposed raw water intake for the Franklin Water & Sewer Authority (FWASA) below
the Town of Bunn in Franklin County. The intake will be located upstream of the
railroad crossing adjacent to the bridge on SR 1611 (Franklin Co). The classification

change could potentially extend a linear distance of 10 miles upstream of the proposed
intake.
The Tar River at SR 1611 is our last sampling station in the study of runoff from the
Daniel's Dairy Farm.
Tar River Classification - WS-V NSW The Tar River is classified Water Supply V
Nutrient Sensitive Waters from Louisburg water supply intake to a point 3.2 miles
downstream of N.C. Hwy. 581 near Stanhope
Stream Characteristics - Tar River at Louisburg - Drainage Area 437 mil -
7Q10 9.2 cfs - Average Flow 442 cfs
Ambient Data - Data from Ambient Stations for 1994 on the Tar River at Hwy 401
(Louisburg) and SR 1001 show coliform inputs to the river between these two stations,
especially in July and August.
Station
Date
F: Coh
Cond.
(##/100m1)
(umhos)
Hwy. 401
940221
90
43
SR 1001
940221
100
40
Hwy. 401
940323
60
54
SR 1001
940323
90
52
Hwy. 401
940425
10
75
SR 1001
949425
600
73
Hwy. 401
940525
20
87
SR 1001
940525
550
103
Hwy. 401
940627
80
97
SR 1001
940627
480
102
Hwy. 401
940719
190
88
SR 1001
940719
2400
140
Hwy. 401
940817
260
98
SR 1001
940817
34000
99
Hwy. 401
940929
30
101
SR 1001
940929
120
81
Hwy. 401
.941019
120
85
SR 1001
941026
390
98
Hwy. 401
941116
70
88
SR 1001
941116
130
1113
Hwy. 401
941215
90
95
SR 1001
941215
430
98

HWY 401
DANIELS & DANIELS DAIRY FARM
0 1 2
APPROX. SCALE IN MILES FRANKLIN COUNTY
SAMPLING STATIONS
❑ SAND PIT OPERATION

DANIELS
DANIELS
DAIRY FARM
STUDY
showing f
and samp
Miles

O� WArF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j [ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
0 �
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350035
A.C. Daniels Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Franklin County
Dear A.C. Daniels:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 27, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to A.C.
Daniels, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS350035 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the A.C. Daniels Farm, located in Franklin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 1000 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this" is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit,* it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
If NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o,enr,state.nc.us Natzmally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 214 .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 5714700. if you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS350035
APS Central Files
9

NVId NOIIVZlllln 3.Lsvm

W...
LI
Producer:. C Dame LS
Location:9 „ IQammif ��►t?�eIs � (as Za/Ic _ NC .27V(a
Telephone: 9/9
Type Operation: Swine twe gn fa r r
Number of Animals: s
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate. to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed -to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be. grown.
Several factors are important in 'implementing your waste
utilization' plan in order, to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen'than.the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5'tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste maybe applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
1

6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the. potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by, the Environmental
Management Commission.
*. 2

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
animals X O.W (gal.) waste/animal/year =
..3W - ---(gal.) waste/year
Aincrunt Qf Plant vai ab a Nitro e P P o aced Per Year
/DOD animals X�lbs. PAN/animal/year_lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is,a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply -the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the nitrogen.(N) requirements'of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface application:
Table 1: -ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
I- No. Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and R may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
3

Table 2: ACRES WITH AGRETT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
* Bee footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
Table 2
Total Z., 8S !O 7 9
Amount of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
4

C�M
Your facility is designed for /9,0 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
(,p MOMMS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation ' <71, 5
Call the local Natural Resources. Conservation Service (formerly soil
Conservation service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
fiARRATIVE OF OPERATION
1. This plan is based on hayed bermuda in field 1 of
tract 518.
2. Irrigation plan was developed by Brock Equipment Co.
utilizing an underground main & hydrant irrigation
system.
3. Before you apply waste:
A) See attached map of "buffered areas".
B) Review "Required,'Specification" on page 8.
C) Calibrate your irrigation equipment not to
exceed recommended application rate (In/Hr) on
page 7.
4. Always maintain at least a 25 feet vegetative
buffer between other property, 'public right-of-way,
and surface waters.
5. Report anv changes in the plan to NRCS, IMMEDIATELY.
6. NOTE:.The lagoon,is 6 inches shy of being a waste
storage pond. Lagoon will need'to.be agitated
& pumped. in near..future to maintain existing
waste utilization. plan. (As of Dec.. 12, 1990.)
�1

5
MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO - BE;, USED FOR THE UTILISATION
OF n6TX WATER.
11

RWI
A1
faP, ri E. r..'v
9ti it r,
-iAi
�'.i 4Ta
1,14P IS!
It
Big Pe achtree'Creek.
tj V6
z
i"�sr4f *k'r t•''.•s..., wi ,w ss3y.,•1t if ,l. 'yf a� .'�LW,sf-�
LI7
T Vv :kC
'0; A. G. Daniels
S ine'. (Wean to �erkion'
Feed6r) 0 p
7y . 1.11,

Application of Waste.by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate(In/Hr) Amount(In.)
(519) 0 r da. 0. 35 1). SD
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A
SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
7

i�.

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
NOTE TO FIELD OFFICE PERSONNEL PREPARING THIS PLAN;
The following items must be addressed in the Waste Utilization Plan in order for
the plan to meet the minimum requirements of the .0200 rules and NRCS
standards. All of these concerns 'may not be applicable for a given operation.
Additional concerns may have to be addressed at certain operations. These items
express the minimum requirements 'Where necessary, the planner/designer is to
elaborate on. -these concerns or add others as applicable. Comments within these
items that are-inI parenthesis, are underlined, and are bold typed are for Field
Office reference only and are not to be, included in the landowner's copy of the
planThis note is also provided only for Field Office reference and is not to be
included in the landowner's copy of the plan.
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters.of.the state b runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application,' or direct discharge during . operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal'discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues.
rR
3.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). if an ACS is used the soil
loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" required by DEM: ,(fee FOT1G Standard 393 Filter Slips arm
8

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not beapplied'when'the wind"is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated,on conventionally tilled:cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or. grassland; the waste" may. be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to,flooding.. (See Weather and Climate ire No
!'nitinlinn #I in AID' Tnrhmlam rl Anforon.Pa _ Knvimnnmont IMP fnr orsidn"00 1
7. Liquid waste shall.be apppplied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur, offsite or io surface, waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not ;be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the.surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on activel y..,growing crops in such a manner that the
crop, is nof: damaged by, burning or smotheruig'of the plant. This is an important
consideration where•swind; poultry or:`other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied.. ,Surface br*6ast solids' ,;6 slurries, may, damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted 'Generally waste��should be apppplied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent
of the leaf 'area, is covered. " This 'should� not normally. be a concern where diluted,
low nutrient waste is; irrigated or'surface broadcast from .a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely; damaged:due &waste application, the -plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge�of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur.
10. Waste nutrients. shall not.be applied in fall or�winter. for spring planted crops on
sois with a high' potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should"be held toa minimum and a Suitablewinter cover crop planted to take up
released nutrients. Waste shall not be" applied' more than 30 days prior to planting
of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than: 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may be reduced for waters'1. that are not perenni provided adequate
vegetative filter strips are present: (See,, ndand 393 er Stress)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways
that discharge directly into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates
provided the application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
9

•
R

u,.;f��r. ;x.V.r. ki•: .,2 '�yy;•r',{''' .iSk ': +a •^oyM off. e 4c: ;.,Y,f: r�.r,{'....
�1•i't5'.G:�ii' 4:ry:��4:vt' :f '�i; Yr: ; u{ t;;:. � � >' + •t ���' �"ftfi�:;� y�;r `;..
... t¢;>�:.�;:.::E:d:a<..wii������a*�d:.,��,•.�^e�'.����di,.. u .�e ��,a�C�nf,!.,`.`�',�,..�ii'e:. ,_ .;k�...,. n�;�vaxt.,..,..,..
REQUIRED 'SPECIFICATIONS
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into 'tle animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a
maximum operating level to provide adequatestorage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm
event in addition to the one {1),foot mandatory freeboard.
1$. A protective cover of, appropriate `vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments; -berms, pipe
'runs, etc.). If, needed, special vegetation
shall be providedfor' these areas and, shalfbe''fenced, as necessary, to protect the
vegetation. Vegetation s'uch a: s trees, shrubs, and other .woody species, etc. are
limited toweas where; considered -appropriate: Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and'accessible: Lagoon berms and:structures rshould be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion; leakage, or `discharge:
19. If animal production, at, the facility: is to:be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
thepossibility of an illegal discharge "pollution and erosion.
20. Waste.: handling structures, piping; pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular:basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,: and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.

WASTE UTILIZATIONPLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: 440, - _0_612els F wl
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the. state from,a storm event, less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The.'approved,.plan will be. filed on -site at
the farm ,o'ff 'Ice - and at the office: of: the local Soil and Water
Conservation-District'and will :be available for review. by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: _ /Q . L'. �q/7/CAS �i'•
(Please print)
signature: �,(, , � �J �� Dates _1 - ! q- ?7
Name of Manager(If different from owner) :
signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) 6kef i'aWh
Affiliation:_ /�4rii�t eb, Soi/e R%ale,- ltnE'r�l�i dis ricf
Address (Agency):
C .27522
Signature: p�r-.•� Date: f1fTZ9

NVId

� �!L r ]1�
��a�rl{Q �'�

Brock Equipment Co.
PO Box 100
Bailey, N.C. 27807
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This irrigation system was proudly designed by John Boykin of Brock Equipment Co.
A scaled drawing, required calculations, and required specifications on pipe and equipment
are included.
The following buffers were maintained on this farm:
25 feet from ditch
75 feet from surface water and perennial streams
25 feet from property lines
200 feet from residence
100 feet from well
AD comments and recommendations are appreciated.
Thank you,
if
John -Boy

TRA VELING IRRIGA TION SYSTEM
CALCULATIONS
TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION RATE
I =((96.3*q)/(3.14*(.09*r)"2))*360/w
where,
I = approximate actual application rate (iph)
q = discharge (gpm)
r = wetted radius (ft)
w = portion of circle receiving water (degrees)
Aaalic�ation Rate 0.20 inches per hour
.TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION AMOUNT
d = (1.605*q)/(I"s)
where,
d = gross application (in)
q = sprinkler discharge (gpm)
I = travel lanes spacing ft
Pa 9 ( )
s = travel speed (fpm)
.. -`Total-ApP1I tlon Amount = 0.24 inches
;.VELD_ CITY IN A PIPELINE
v = (0.408*gyd"2
where,
v = .velocity of water (fps)
q = flowrate (gpm)
d = inside diameter of pipe (in)
VQIQcity of „Wate'r
4,,L3_ feet per second
IF q = 60.00 gpm
r = 112.50 ft
and w = 330.00 degrees
then I = 0.20 iph
IF q = 60.00 gpm
I = 160.00 ft
and s = 2.50 fpm
then d = 0.24 in
IF q = 60.00 gpm
and d = 4.00 in
then v = 1.53 fps

Ft - YI4FJl -
'
TRICTION LOSS
as.
IN SUPPL Y LINE AND/OR TRAVELER HOSE
'FRICTION LOS§ IN SUPPLY LINE
FL =[(0.2063i(1001c)^1.852)'[(Q"1.852)1(DA4.8656)]'(U100)]".433
where,
FL = friction loss in supply line (psi) IF c = 150
c = roughness coefficient Q = 60 gpm
Q = flowrate (gpm) D = 4 in
D = inside diameter of pipe or hose (in) and L = 760 ft
L w length of supply line or hose (ft)
then FL = 0.75 psi
Friction Loss in SilwAy.Line 0275 psi
FRICTION BOSS IN TRAVELLER HQSE (if solid set ... enter 0 for gpm )
fLL=.[(0.2083"(1001c)^1.852)-[(Q"1.852)1(DA4.8656)]*(U100)]-.433
where,
FL = friction loss in traveler hose (psi) 1F c = 150
c.= roughness coefficient Q = 60 gpm
Q = flowrate (gpm) D = : 2.25 in
D = inside diameter of pipe or hose (in) and L 700 ft
length of supply line or hose (ft)
then FL = 11.32 psi
Friction Loss ir) Traveller Hose = 11.32 psi

TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD
psi
feet
Elevation dif. from water to CL of pump-
1.732
4
Elevation of nozzle-
2.165
5
Elevation dif. between CL of pump
and high point in field-
4.33
10
Sprinkler discharge pressure-
70
161.7
Yt:
FL in pump suction assembly-
2
4.62
FL in pump discharge assembly-
2
4.62
FL in traveller hose** -
11.32
26.14
FL in supply line** -
0.75
1.73
TDH-1 94.291 217.81
,BRAKE MQRSEPQjIVER
BHP - [Q*TDH]43%0*Epl
Mere,
BHP= power required to drive the pump (hp)
Q =flow rate (gpm)
TDH = total head the pump operates against (ft)
Ep = pump efficiency (decimal form)
IF Q µ 197 gpm
TDH = 217,81 ft
and Ep = 0.5
then BHP = 22 hp
': Bwakel orseoovi►er 22 horsepower

y� Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
rve1. speed- 2.5
-sti�;'��lpplication rate = .2
�fx3�a{
mo., Spacing = 180
" Wetted diameter — 225
Guiia make and size = Nelson 100
Nozzle size = .5
Operating pressure at gun = 70
Operating pressure at reel = 83
Operating pressure at pump — 90
Arc pattern = 330
ik Flow rate of sprinkler = 60
Pump power requirement (bhp) — 22
Total acres covered {effective) = 6,85
Traveler make and model = Cadman 2250
Hose length s 700
'Hose diameter (ID) = 2.25
'Sped compensation — mechanical
Hydrant
number
Effective Width
Effective Length
Acres Covered
1
180
460
190
2
180
305
126
IFS'
3
170
550
2.15
4
170
395
1.54

a; Brock Equipment CO.
:.
P.O. Box 100
Bailey N.C. 27807
[phone]
f2.
4" SDR 21 PVC PIPE
$1.00
$760.00
� �7✓M1,# 4
yr.
Field Hydrants
$235.00
$940.00
¢IpS�[tf
q.lj
Lagoon Hydrant
$235.00
$235.00
p 2
Air Releases
$75 00
$150 00
a1
90 degree elbow $65.00
$65.00
-
1
Cadman 2250 $9500.00
$9500.00
1
John Deere 4020 wB2EQHH $9750.00
$9750.00
Tax
$181.50
Thurst Blocking
$100.00
Labor
$1360.00
' `• ` �. ,`: -
Total
$23041.50
'•f- "air .i

CONTROL
CHECKLIST
1. OPERATION & 'MAINTENANCE PLAN
2'. ANSECT CONTROL
3. ODOR CONTROL
4. MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS

D. Operation and Maintenance Plan -'include information about inspecting:
1. Pool Area - look.for:
a) Undesirable vegetative Growth ,
b) Floating or lodged debris
2. Embankment
a) Settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
b) Side slope Stability - slumps or bulges
c) Wet or damp areas on the back slope
d) Erosion due to lack of vegetation or wave action
e) Rodent damage
3. Pipes
a) Condition of pipes - look for:
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
(3) accumulation of salts or minerals
b) Extend out into the lagoon beyond the toe of the bank slope
c) Be supported by piers, posts, or a cradle to prevent sagging,
41 Vegetation - brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled by
mowing, spraying, chopping, etc.
5. Pumps - check for proper operation of:
a) Recycling pumps
b) Irrigation pumps
6. Outside surface water diversions - inspect your diversion system for the
following: .
a) Adequate vegetation
b) Diversion capaciry
c) Ridge height

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sllni'Ce Cause 1IMPs to Control 1115CCIS Site Speciric Pracliccs
Liquid Syslems
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids blush system is designers and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gullers as designed.
Re'Inove bridging of accumulated solids :.it
Lagoons and tits • Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
g inches over more than 301/a of surface.
I XLCSSIYC Wgdalive Decaying vegelslinn Maintain vegetative control alotig banks of
[ iio►vlh lagoons and other inpoundmews to prevent
accutitttlatiois of decaying vegetative matter
along walees edge on impoundment's perintetcr.
I�cc�tri �
Design, o1wraie and maimaist fern systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) in minimize lite
accurtitdalion of decaying wastage.
Q� Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
0' day interval diming summer; I5-30 day interval
during winler).
Feed Sknage • Accutrrtilatimis of feed resichies Iteduce: tnnisinre accumulation murlation within and
around imntediale perimeter of iced slorage
areas by insuring drainage: away !ruin silt;
and/or providing adctlinne coniaittnicni (e.g..
covered hill for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain penducis).
n Inspect (sir and reprove or break tip accumulated
solids in filler strips around Iced slorage as
needed.
Feed
AMIC - November 11, 1996. Page 1

ce Cause DIY.- !a Control Insects, Site Specific Practices
Aninial l l ig Arcas Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
anti feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
Dry hlantire I laudling • Accumulations of anintal wastes ❑ Remove spillage o'n a routine basis (e , .7 - 10
S)stetus day -interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure.is loaded for land
appli'QIioti or disposal.
❑ Provide.for adequate drainage around manure
n� stockpiles.
r li ❑ inspect far and remove or breakup accumulated
ii wastes in fillet strips around stockpiles anti
mantire handling areas as needed.
For inure inlonnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Enlownlogy, Box 7613, North Carolina Slate 1lnivcrshy,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AKIIU - Nuvctnber 11, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause AMPS to INirihriize niter site Specific Practices
I'aiui,lead • Swine production n Vegetative or wooded buffers;
0 Recommended best management practices;
j( Good judgment and common sense
Aniinai body surfacers Dirty manure -covered aninials q , Dry !]oars - - - -�
Fluor surfaces . Wet majoirc-covered floors f Sloped floors;
�Walercrs located over slotted floors;
n Feeders at high end of solid floors;
O Scrape manure buildup froin floors;
,1 Underfloor ventilation for drying . -
Al.uwre: Collection pits •
thine;
CP
Frequent tuauure removal by flush, pit recharge,
•
Partial microbial decomposition
or scrape;
n
Underfloor venfilation
Vemiiation cxhaiisl fans
Vulatile gases; n I
n
hall itlaintenance;
Dust ��J �'('r
n
f:mcient air movement
InHIM ur surf.,ccs *
Dust
Wasbdown between groups of animals;
n
Deed additives;
feeder covers;
0
Feed delivery downsfwid extenders its feeder
covers
I.lush tacks
Agitatina of recycled lagoon
n
flush tank covers;
f„
Y l,
liquid while: tanks arc filling
Cl
iixtend fill lines to near bouain of tanks with
auti-siphon vents — — — -- —
Flush alleys • Abilation Miring wastewater 1W Underfloor flush with uridcrfluor ventilation
conveyance
�['it techaige points 0 Agitation of recycled lagnnn I`7 i:xtend recharge liises lu near Unitnni of feels
liquid while pits are filling with anti -siphon veliis
.1_ili stiniuns + Agitation during sump lank Cl Sump lank covers
r �y filling and drawdowu
Outside diain cullcciiuii • Agitation during wastewater n Ilox covers
ur juiiciiun boxes conveyance:
A NV IC - November 11, 1996, Pace 3

Source Cause IIMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Cud of drainpipes al • Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces 0 Volatile gas emissions; " Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; C Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ✓✓W Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Minimum agitation when.ptimping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
n Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • I ligh pressure agitation; Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
uOtZles a Wind drill Minimum recommended operating pressure;
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
%wrage lank or basin • Paitial microbial decompositinn; n Bolton or midlevel loading;
surla�c • Mixing while filling;
Cl 'Tank covers; ,
• Agitation when emptying p Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Sculiug basin Surface - • Partial Iuicrubial decouuposition; ❑ Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid _ -
• Mixing while filling; level;
• Agitation when emptying CI Remove settled solids regularly
hiarntre, slurry or sludge •
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets a
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
n
Proven biological additives or oxidants
-
I hicovered manure. 0
Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
shirty or sludge on field
drying
CI
Soil incorporation within 49 lirs.;
surlaces
Sprcad in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
I)c,icl ik1111UJI5 • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
head animal disposal Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
Cl Proper local ion/coastnlction ofdisposal pits
Inciocr.i��ts lncauupfele combustion n Secondary shuck boaters
AtAOC - Novcwher 11, 1996. Page 4

0
r . trcn Cause BL--,'s to Miuimlre Odor Site Specific is-actices
Slssn+linb+,-•. >icr around • Improper drainage; J3 Grade and landscape such that water drains
CacilitiCs0 Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure Iracked onto Poorly mainlained access roads Farm access, road maintenance
public roads how funs
access
Additional Information : Available From
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 RttldRMP Packet NCSIJ, County extension Cemer
Swinc Production Tarn( Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; r-BAE Fact Sheet NCSU -'HA ti
Swine i'roducrion Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NCSU - RAE
Swine 1'roducdaii Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EDAE 129-88 NCSIJ - DAI:
Lagoon Dcsign and Management for, Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EDAC 103-83 NCSIJ - ItAI's
Culibrdrion of Mature and Wastewater Application Equipment; E13AE i:aci Sheet NCSIJ - 11AH
Controlling Odors front Swine Buildings; Pill-33 NCSIJ - Swine Extension
Iinvironmental Assurance Program ; NI'1'C Manual. NC fork Producers Assoc
Options fur Managing Odor ; a report fToni ihe'Swine Odor Task Farce NCSIJ Agri Consrnunications
Nuisance Coitccrns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Ux)perative Fxtensinn
AKIO(: - Novembul— 11. 1990, I'age 5

i Mortality hfanagement Methods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
•
:f Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at bast 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rende:inz plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of pan of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached) c�on oet r
l✓�:�^ c�~ IS. I9()6

Animal Waste 'Management Plan Certification
EPleaSe Me or orint all information that dc(!s not require a Sienature)
E.Yistirt� or::>'Ne�� or. Ex anded.... ( Tease : > : Ci rCle. on a)'
General Information:
Name of Farm: -C . r Facility No: 35 -- 3-5
Owner(s) Name: A. e . Dares l S Jr. _Phone No: %92 853-• 3102
Maiiins Address: P69 Rernrnic E2nicls Rci _ �as�allo�� NC 2,7f316
Farm Location: County Farm is located in:__ _�r�t�K11►1
]Yau ° ��n r g i I! Latitude and Longitude:. 3 �(a. 1 7� lZ Integrator:. T-
Please attach a copy of a doting road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions. milepost, etc.):
L66o4rei f2 mile nnyib e5f-1n4e_r!5e-cflon SR 16IA ate 5R 1(2}2 _
0 Vern do n_Desc,rip ti on:
T}pe of swine No. of Animals -
Awean to Feeder 400, O_
Feeder to Finish
Zi Farrow to wean
.1 Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
D Gilts
Z. boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
D Laver D Dairy
Puilets . D Beef
Other Type of Livestock: Nrunher of Animals:
;id�J^'i
Previous<Desr?nz:Cauacin.-`-_Aildrtrorial:DesrQ�iCrzacitt �„ TvralDe5r2ir`Ci7naciri
:acreage Available for Application: � � �5 -� �, Required Acreage: 3. o
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds :�� Total Capacity: Lq0 530 Cubic Feet (fN)
Are subsurface drains present o0, the farm: ITS, or (please circle one)
if YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or 5PR-kY FIELD (please circie.onej
iM �!e * y+ xc W •s a� �M �k eft �It µ * He +k �k +k sr tM �!t pia $ M ri gaga ii� oh Aa a! yY ya ii �k ye f!eW Ye �!t fb +k irk irMlitic �a is aa�t ai++k�F-iraa liriAia aeok i. +!e ii i. i,w kit yic i,i. i. x K
-0wrler f Manager Agreement '
[ (we) verifv that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand Eire operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and %vill
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of die waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental ;LlanMernent before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state dither direcEly through a man-made
conveyant:_ or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from die
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved phut will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know chat any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DELI or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a tide transfer.
Name of Land Owner:
•�� Signature:
Name of Ntanager(if different from owner):
Sicynature:
Date:_ I z - /f - U
Date:
.k«'C -- Augwst 1. 199

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 1.
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste managements}stem for the farm named above has an animal wasL.:
management plan that meets or exceeds standards aid, specification of the Division of Environmental Management
(DENO as specified in 15A NCAC 2H,0217 aad the.USDA-.Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) an(Vor the
North Carolina Soil and. Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H,0317 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001.
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category .designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
�R�s AS.sisTED q•vo aeRTIP1GD
II. Certi,lcation of Design . ':AGec� ,.� `F /979. AccoRD.A&
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System rO DEP7W c+4ec�p BY rArF
Check the appropriate box
A' Fxi tiny facility without retrofit � (SD orWUP)
Storage volume is adequate For operation capacity: storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
_1 New, expanded or retr ,fitted facility (SD)
.�nimai waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection s%stems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the mini(num standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): F', AA) K EN AI S
Affiliation U.5 DA -- NRGS Date Wort: Completed:
- Z972
Address (Agency): 4bo 1 CARY.a D& SUir- D ALtaw4,w, Aj e- Phone No.: 91
.Z7 wa
Signature: Date:_ /Z- ► 6 - 97
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum; separations (buffers); adequate. amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): RQbZrt &Quin
Affiliation -&QM a;i _.5arl_ Wgttr `Cn�serva�+an Di.sfeir _Date Wore Completed:
Address (A.oency): jdt c...fi,ekgtt Mid— Phone No.: (9l) !4b - 3137
Si2nature:-Date: 12/17 97
C) Runoff Controls_ from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Facility without exterior lots '(SD or WUP or RC)
This facility'does not contain any, exterior lots:
J Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutanrs from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): r ' 136wi .
Affiliation Fr"jin 5Q�1_woler Ca4scr►tafa+, Dtsiviaf Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):.faLS,.& SIM i nglaum , Nt a' s 4j Phone No.: 9 q =
Signature: Date: -i�71 -
,. WC -- August 1. 1997

D)- Al2plication and Handling E ui meat
Check the appropriate box
•`' D ExistingnT expanding fin0li1vw xiwagge anl2kcationn (WUP orI)
Animal waste application equipment specified- in the,•plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as .necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading .rates. a schedule .for timing of appiications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
New. exonuded-car exisfine-facility without existing waste aoolicltion equipment for wr v 'trrigntion. (1:)
Animal waste application equipgen[.spzcified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceedeither the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibMdan and adjusanen[ guidance are
contained as part of the.plan).
:D New, o 's'facility w' is' w tin ew n tr Q in
_. . item. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment 5pecitie.d in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed applicadon equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either"the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
-,contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 1 A ee_ e /
Affiliation /' l� Date Work Completed:_-,_
- l
Address (Agency}: . D, Phone No.:
Signature: Date:__
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. 'Mortality 'Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility" includes a Waste, Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency .action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to ilxis site .and Best M:ut�Lg4me nt •PracdCes'tb %'(iniMiZC Odors and Best
i -Management Practices to Coiitroi-lnsecd have been selected aad includedin the" waste management p Man. Both the
'Mortality tilanauemem Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
came of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ %bw -__ &bW_y1
Affiliation ��Cl h`So►� Ufie (4+rsrrrtxttdij RsMef _Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):_ICI gic ke 61J4. Lgg1i6vf2_.NC 275401 Phone No.:
Sionature: _�. %-- Date: 1V l?`q:j _
F) Written Notice of dery or Exoandin, Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after ,tune
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded_
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highwayfroin this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of'CGS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
.'� Name of Land Owner:_ _ NIA
Signature: Date:
Name of Mana;er (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
..k1V'C -- Aul-ust 1• 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation •
A) Collection. Storaze. Treatment Installation
New. expanded -or retrofitted facility_ '(SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): N/A
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Dale:
B) Land application Site (WGP)
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is -in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
., Conditional approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthlday/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudlization plan. : :'�
Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification. the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control; "
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Qbcrt Broum
Affiliation "jil ea2il � kbil+ie r, .Asjl�et Dace Work Completed:
Address (Agency):_ Q aicre4 Rltrot IDW,ibum, W. 2IS49 Phone No.:_t,g1g_l .4,16 -3137
Signature:_r&_6. _ _ _ Date: 12 j7117
This following signature block is only :to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from 6E3I.
Name of Land Owner:,%fit
Signature: _ - - Date:
Name of Manager (if different tram owner);
Signature: Date:
A,WC -- August 1. 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facilitv with exterior IoLt
ylediuds to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as ;peciited
•` in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):R
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: -- _ Date:
D) A olication and Handline Equipment Installation (WU-P or I)
Check the appropriate block
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is a site and reach for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to Elie owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Animal waste application and liandlintt equipment specified in Elie plan has not been installed but Elie owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained, calibration and
adjusuuent guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
.V/ Conditional approval': Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in Elie plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by ?--3/ q (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the -waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of -the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Printj: f e
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Z!!!, Af� — W &5P%42�L, W7 Phone No.:
Signature: �J���i7 .-_ Date -
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in [lie conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste. management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DE.M.
s
Name ofthd:.O vner:� C �.✓� .P ,2 .�i' -
Signature:
Date: IS 2 3
flame of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality :Manacement (SD. Si. WUP. RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also be-n installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): gfo rl
4 Affiliation_
Fyunkliw .Safi t Y4lukr (asrvouficvw� Nioct Date Work Completed
Address (Agency): 10.1 S. iitcke++- glya . LoygNburs. NC ,:M41 Phone 'io.: 4 9) t 9 :3131
Siunature:_ RV - A) ..�-- - - Date:
A%VC .. August 1, •1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
•1 Department of Environment, Health,. and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a cope
in your files with vour Animal Waste Management Plan.
4
ANVC -- :august 1. 1997 is

A.C. DANIELS JR.
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FACILITY. # 35 - 35
1,000: WEAN TO. FEEDER
SWINE OPERATION
0

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
2. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3. IRRIGATION PLAN
4. CONTROL CHECKLIST
5, CERTIFICATION FORM
9

0
CAUTION !
CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning may
occur in livestock., Sampling .forage or hay for nitrate
levels: is recommended.
CONTACT Franklin Cooperative Extension Service at 496-3344
for FREE TESTING of nitrate levels in forage or hay crops.
�fb:.a

V
F
WHAT RECORDS DO INSPECTORS NEED FOR YOUR FARM?
Mike Regans
Area Specialized Agent, Environmental Education
N.C. Cooperative Extension Service
Keeping accurate records and implementing recommended best
management practices are the ways to prove to the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ), the Division of Soil and Water Conservation
(DSWC), and the general public that you are properly managing
your animal waste management system. Accurate and up-to-date
records will enable you to document that recommended waste
management practices are used to get the most benefit from the
nutrient or fertilizer value of the manure produced on your
animal operation and at the same time protect the environment.
Senate Bill 1217 requires that every swine operation with
250 or more head be inspected twice annually, once by
representatives of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation
and once by representatives of the Division of Water Quality.
When an inspector visits your farm, what records do you
need? The answer to that question depends on when your animal
waste management plan was certified and when you receive your
general permit. The dates of legislation and changes in NRCS
standards are the reasons for the differences in requirements.
General permits are already being issued and although DWQ has
four more years to issue general permits to all the registered
farms in the state, indications are that every effort is being
made to have all permits issued within the next two years.
When you receive your permit, please take the time to read
it. The general permit is a contract between you and the
Division of Water Quality. I suggest that you have a copy of the
general permit with your other records.
An inspector' wants to see all the components of your
certified waste management plan. The date your waste management
plan was certified determines which components are required. You
may heed to consult with the technical specialist that wrote your
waste management plan to be sure you have all the necessary
components. You should have all the available information on
your lagoon including the actual lagoon design, the lagoon BMP
checklist, and the lagoon operation and maintenance plan. Be
sure. any notarized agreements, such as a,waiver .by,;a.landowner,
are' included Inyouurywaste management ;plan.F.
.. �, y 7 y t y, y� ° y.. r mow' 4 a '._q •tr
r r c
s4r�ta rl f•'n
`S` � .v y : u + Ey, .. i. r H�r, "� a i M� Y r;3C 7�y Y�f �Wr iWF';, ri k "$• '� . `} r •d'.S h s.
4%
F�
h� Ay4
"" 4' e s� y i �-. �: �- -7 '� V1 ��i' ♦ r �T!�: .'4�. ;f'�-w �.. -7 .� Y, c 'S ey

While we're on the subject of lagoons, remember that all
lagoons must have a lagoon marker properly installed. The
deadline for installation was January 1, 1997. Once you receive
your general permit, you will be required to keep a record of
weekly lagoon levels.
A very important component of your waste management plan and
a requirement of Senate Sill 1217 is an emergency action plan.
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off the site. All
employees should be familiar with and have access to the plan. An
emergency action requires a phone call to the Division of Water
Quality within 24 hours and a written report within 5 days.
Inspectors want to see maps, particularly maps that are easy
to read and illustrate where and how you are applying wastes.
ASCS (FSA) maps have field numbers and acreages and show the
shapes and locations of the fields. Your waste management plan
probably contains these maps. However, for recording purposes,
field size is that portion of the field that receives waste
applications or the "wetted area". Wetted area is equal to or
less than field size due to irrigation system layout and use of
required -buffers, or due to accessibility with spreader
equipment. Application records are easier for the inspector to
understand if field numbers on maps correspond with those on the
application record forms. The inspectors I've talked with really
like the simple schematic maps of spray fields that show the
location of "pulls" or "sprinklers".
Your waste application records must be on the approved
forms. Remember that an IRR-2 form must be used for each field
per crop cycle. The crop type and recommended PAN loading rate
on the IRR-2 must correspond with the crop and loading rate in
your waste utilization plan. Inspectors will pay particular
attention to the Nitrogen Balance column on the IRR-2. The
nitrogen balance should always be less than the recommended
loading rate and should never be a negative number. Information
from IRR-1 should be transferred to the appropriate IRR-2 as soon
as possible.
'Any calibration, maintenance, or repair to irrigation
equipment should be documented. The date of the calibration,
maintenance, or repair with a brief description should be
sufficient. The most recent version of the Animal Waste
Management Plan Certification form, dated January 1, 1997 states
that "calibration and adjustment guidance will be provided as
part of the animal waste management plan". Such guidance can be
0
•
0

provided by the•Extension publications titled "Field Calibration
Procedures for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment"which are
availabl.e'from your county Extension Center.
Senate Bill 1217 requires a waste analysis within at least
60 days of the date of application. This gives you a 120 day
window. I'm recommending that you make waste analysis part of
your management routine. Take a waste sample for analysis on the
first day or last day of every other month. Assign this
responsibility to your certified operator. Keep the waste
analysis reports in your record book for reference.
Senate Bill 1217 also requires an annual soil test. All
application fields should be sampled and the soil analysis
reports used to determine the amount of lime to be applied in
order to maintain a proper pH and to monitor zinc and copper
levels. Although the soil analysis report makes a recommendation
for nitrogen application, the nitrogen loading rate for each crop.
is determined by your waste utilization plan. Keep the soil
analysis reports in your record book for reference.
• Although not required until a general permit is is$ued,
inspectors are asking for odor control and insect control
checklists as well as a mortality management checklist. Odor
control and insect control best management practices are to be
determined for each farm by the operator and a certified
technical specialist. Once the BMPs are determined and the
checklist completed, the practices are expected to be
implemented.
I suggest that you provide for the inspector a copy of your
Animal Waste Management System Operator Certification, the annual
Operator Certification renewal form, and the operator -in -charge
designation form. Soon, you will be able to provide certificates
of completion for the required 6 hours of recertification every 3
years.
Remember that you are documenting the management of your
animal waste management system and your compliance with
regulations. You know how to do it. Now, you just have to prove
to someone else that you did it.
e •
� 5t3 y � � P � a �., f(' � a srx � •
f
c
�4s,'4!cS!J�1

t
I .Y<+
"� Y. .Is '`� ,� _i. !
i - 1 v �. R'• �:1 f. i �l
S
.� J i .i rr. ,a
., f } ti- -ta -.a-'
4.
� I r � a �
y I � F ; •.
!�
' "a X^. ` E � r � T ia':'.fifS }� bnJ,•3) � � � ~I� � S ^i i�# � (f i j{ ♦ 5 i fi.� - A . y
� k Ri %yet i7 R Yi i� I Et. }3 �
i:r� h •"�''..di r l'. .��4�" d�' F' ,fj, r• .a J'
\
.
All
.IA I " v h F
Ann Ar
I
o-' „I 5,•h T�. - az �' �.�r � �. �^�l�h ail '� 1d 1Y '� 1 ( - - -
f
:
����'4 t�
La. .;J g
).
1
_Y' ., A ,d rL J .5 �'i� o aa..�a sf+it -'>:EI4T. f Y \t f
C,. 1 v I r f:.A iug4'MP'
<j 14
Sf4q
5
s1 kx f, r yl: t xi.. S st 7 lr r r r
. I
AI A - s�rr.r
i -r ' i•� _ f •. �.� ( s lyt.. � F �'� yu f k 1 e s
,
. ,
;.t, .4
'�yirP
�
Zoo! - 1
1 y s r.. f_. Y 5 ''t� r si 1 L n: .>}, w` L k h F It
•, Y
5 �'k n
�'' h �
{y
r � �-
= t '•_
d 3�'A k Yh • 4 - -. 1 y i 3y 9r :G E ` 5 I W i 5 r s ! £, :. 5 L
44 h N-: ��Yd!
Iyr 4' ,� i}IY 1�:`li �{ ,4'4?'1—too
✓ � rGYM �` e' .. A ,Q a j. #i ` r,q: •L35�, '+r, lj') � L I Y��II� ': rf f�w _ti F1 4.�at{I P i'i I { ,e f�. ;, S b 1t 3,, + ,t - 1 1^
1 f# k 5,:
• -.• AJ' ,.r .y Ir i �5 ! 1•✓'\ i ��V} 1. "k Y <L k. -
* �
P 4 71 yy
51 tv ! , q < 1. r 1 i`�.Y �55 h A
,.
MIC6 ��; 'rS �AIA d,�y�f�`9 L11�tl ��w •�tk l �ry9 q�t Y'(r F]•?,-dl IIJl � Lrf
�
y
aSMY;F
V i{''r Ir i l low 8 fxf�' „➢. d 7 q1 1 i
C.,�fV
1' I Yal
ra �f
w r 1 ] fi•" >i lr % .y Y t }L e} i1 r}s .+11
vt 7 y Y r ht �Y' Y' F rs
h
0

EMERGENC, Y ACTION
PLAN

0
r
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-496- 5005
SWCD 919--4 9 6 - 3137
NRCS 919-496-3137
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. -
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. phis plan_ „should be -posted in an accessible
location or all to ees-at t e ac 1't . The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a.
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of -dam.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate.
C.
Stop
all flows to the lagoon
immediately.
d.
.Call
a.pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
e: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. ' Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a.. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-446 500S.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-414 -3344, local SWCD
office phone number 919-LM -3131 , and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-4%--3131 .
4: If none of the -above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: f
b. Contractors Address: ud & C �G C.
C. Contractors Phone:
• 6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: S RC5
b.'Phone: 23i �-1 0 u,
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
•tir" ahKxWm"hiword1*maectptdn.dn
mot 12.30

0 d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a.. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
'c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all, flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidevall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and,pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.' Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
t surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: contact appropriate agencies,
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919--911 -y?QC . After hours, emergency number: 919-
�'" 733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone. number, the details of

7 N 11
1
A.C. DANIELS JR.
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FACILITY # 35 - 35
1,000 WEAN TO FEEDER
SWINE OPERATION
�A moo op
r

r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
2. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3. IRRIGATION PLAN
4. CONTROL CHECKLIST
5. CERTIFICATION FORM

CAUTION !
CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning may
occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate
levels is recommended.
CONTACT Franklin Cooperative Extension Service at 496-3344
for FREE TESTING of nitrate levels in forage or hay crops.

s
t !
R
WHAT RECORDS DO INSPECTORS NEED FOR YOUR FARM?
Mike Regans
Area Specialized Agent, Environmental Education
N.C. Cooperative Extension Service
Keeping accurate records and implementing recommended best
management practices are the ways to prove to the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ), the Division of Soil and Water Conservation
(DSWC), and the general public that you are properly managing
your animal .waste management system. Accurate and up-to-date
records will enable you to document that recommended waste
management practices are used to get the most benefit from the
nutrient or fertilizer value of the manure produced -on your
animal operation and at the same time protect the environment.
Senate Bill 1217 requires that every swine operation with
250 or more head be inspected twice annually, once by
representatives of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation
and once by representatives of the Division of Water Quality.
When an inspector visits your farm, what records do you
need? The answer to that question depends on when your animal
waste management plan was certified and when you receive your
general permit. The dates of legislation and changes in NRCS
standards are the reasons for the differences in requirements.
General permits are already being issued and although DWQ has
four more years to issue general permits to all the registered
farms in the state, indications are that every effort is being
made to have all permits issued within the next two years.
When you receive your permit, please take the time to read
it. The general permit is a contract between you and the
Division of Water Quality. I suggest that you have a copy of the
general permit with your other records.
An inspector' wants to see all the components of your
certified waste management plan. The date your waste management
plan was certified determines which components are required. You
may heed to consult with the technical specialist that wrote your
waste management plan to be sure you have all the necessary
components. You should have all the available information on
your lagoon including the actual lagoon design, the lagoon BMP
checklist, and the lagoon operation and maintenance plan. Be
sure any notarized agreements, such as a waiver by a landowner,
are included in your waste management plan.

While we're on the subject of lagoons, remember that all
lagoons must have a lagoon marker properly installed. The
deadline for installation was January 1, 1997. Once you receive
your general permit, you will be required to keep a record of
weekly lagoon levels.
A very important component of your waste management plan and
a requirement of Senate Bill 1217 is an emergency action plan.
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off the site. All
employees should be familiar with and have access to the plan. An
emergency action requires a phone call to the Division of Water
Quality within 24 hours and a written report within 5 days.
Inspectors want to see maps, particularly maps ~that are easy
to read and illustrate where and how you are applying wastes.
ASCS (FSA) maps have field numbers and acreages and show the
shapes and locations of the fields. Your waste management plan
probably contains these maps. However, for recording purposes,
field size is that portion of the field that receives waste
applications or the "wetted area". Wetted area is equal to or
less than field size due to irrigation system layout and use of
required -buffers, or due to accessibility with spreader
equipment. Application records are easier for the inspector to
understand if field numbers on maps correspond with those on the
application record forms. The inspectors I've talked with really
like the simple schematic maps of spray fields that show the
location of "pulls" or "sprinklers".
Your waste application records must be on the approved
forms. Remember that an IRR-2 form must be used for each field
per crop cycle. The crop type and recommended PAN loading rate
on the IRR-2 must correspond with the crop and loading rate in
your waste utilization plan. Inspectors will pay particular
attention to the Nitrogen 'Balance column on the IRR-2. The
nitrogen balance should always be less than the recommended
loading rate and should never be a negative number. Information
from IRR-1 should be transferred to the appropriate IRR-2 as soon
as possible.
r
Any calibration, maintenance, or repair to irrigation
equipment should be documented. The date of the calibration,
maintenance, or repair with a brief description should be
sufficient. The most recent version of the Animal Waste
Management Plan Certification form, dated January 1, 1997 states
that "calibration and adjustment guidance will be provided as
part of the animal waste management plan". Such guidance can be

r
provided by the Extension publications titled "Field Calibration
Procedures for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment"which are
available from your county Extension Center.
Senate Bill 1217 requires a waste analysis within at least
60 days of the date of application. This gives you a 120 day
window. I'm recommending that you make waste analysis part of
your management routine. Take a waste sample for analysis on the
first day or last day of every other month. Assign this
responsibility to your certified operator. Keep the waste
analysis reports in your record book for reference.
Senate Bill 1217 also requires an annual soil test. All
application fields should be sampled and the soil analysis
reports used to determine the amount of lime to be applied in
order to maintain a proper pH and to monitor zinc and copper
levels. Although the soil analysis report makes a recommendation
for nitrogen application, the nitrogen loading rate for each crop
is determined by your waste utilization plan. Keep the soil
analysis reports in your record book for reference.
Although not required until a general permit is issued,
inspectors are asking for odor control and insect control
checklists as well as a mortality management checklist. Odor
control and insect control best management practices are to be
determined for each farm by the operator and a certified
technical specialist. Once the BMPs are determined and the
checklist completed, the practices are expected to be
implemented.
I suggest that you provide for the inspector a copy of your
Animal Waste Management System Operator Certification, the annual
Operator Certification renewal form, and the operator -in -charge
designation form. Soon, you will be able to provide certificates
of completion for the required 6 hours of recertification every 3
years.
Remember that you are documenting the management of your
animal waste management system and your compliance with
regulations. You know how to do it. Now, you just have to prove
to someone else that you did it.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-496- 5005
SWCD 919-496- 3137
NRCS 919-496-3137
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. -
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This Plan should be osted in an -accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a.
Add soil to berm to increase elevation of -dam.
b.
Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C.
Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d.
Call a pumping contractor.
e.
Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a.
Immediately stop waste application.
b.
Create a temporary diversion to contaih waste..
c.
Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d.
Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e.
Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

lk
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-494 - 5005.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-444 -3344 , local SWCD
office phone number 919-4'14 --3131 , and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 4%-3137 .
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for -you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: j ,,
b. Contractors Address: ae d cdfa ;• •G•C,
c . Contractors Phone: _r l �� ILL 2_
5: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: FYod C 5 C NR(S )
b. Phone: 7.5 -
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
d auddn..hf wwcVvmq*cnW&n.dcx
++PI 12.98

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a.. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.
Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
c.
Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the property?
e.
Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f.
Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
r
surface waters?
g.
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property)?
h.
How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-S11 -41oo . After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

Producer:. A C Dahle PCs
Location: 9 1 Po rnmi e _ Da►a l_e Is Ad as & lIa NC
Telephone: (*12 _ 953 - 3102
Type Operation:_ Sw1rrc Gvecrn fa fce r
Number of Animals:_ /00.0 90's
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when, it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
1

6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
2

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(galIons, ft3, tons, etc.)
animals X Q.M (gal.) waste/animal/year
PQ (gal.) waste/year
ALuount of Plant Available Nitrogen 4PAN) Produced Per Year
IDoO animals x_O.y8 lbs. PAN/animal/year = �{ lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface. application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N,must be based on -realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
3

Table 2: ACRES WIT$ AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21J
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
* See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced YAO
Surplus or Deficit 522
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
4

Your facility is designed for 1P.Q days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
_MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation q1, 's
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste,
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
1. This plan is based on hayed bermu_da in field 1 of
tract 518.
2. Irrigation plan was developed by Brock Equipment Co.
utilizing an underground main & hydrant irrigation
system.
3. Before you apply waste:
A) See attached map of "buffered areas".
B) Review "Required Specification" on pace 8.
C) Calibrate your irrigation equipment not to
exceed recommended application rate (In/Hr) on
page 7.
4. Always maintain at least a 25 feet vegetative
buffer between other property,'public right-of-way,
and surface waters.
5. Report any changes in the plan to NRCS, IMMEDIATELY.
6. NOTE: The lagoon is 6 inches shy of being a waste
storage pond. Lagoon will need to be agitated
& pumped in near future to maintain existing
waste utilization plan. (As of Dec. 12, 1997.)
5

MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION
OF WASTE WATER.

-31
:tom t _ � ` F�:• 'mow �. .. :C �_;:
16
t t
``6 %y�.�1•. . f t y, {" A,� _., k .i1l�r `.a',. - �)r 1b ,•!i �r ' r
uoilejado (aapaa� of ueaM) au,AAS '
rY:*, _
c► r,r,• •c• ri; `r,.��.yt��'� Slalue❑ •o'y E�
", 0.' \ ]�'� � •�'/ �, f i�� ti.). � yzumy 4`I�.
�, ai � t�► i� t , • �:.i�l! � - r � r + 1� f f -' -a.1�: �1�" +� 1 '�/,k l' + < �.,L i+• �
'.Iv,�„r, 7� 3"y~�,��y}� ir.�i �'S '�D •� - Ti�tY
�� - �� '�•�':'� �aaa� ael���ead 61S `' �:.;,• .`�f ;T�l���_. '�° ,, " ,
l ��.,, QyfF• �" - ' t �.� ' ��,.,,,��� �1-, rt f , f. ✓� �z�1K� y ' � .�'Y'�`4:. ,f t •�,� .�} 'f,• ;� Y �# t� ^�
'hr i
�� s �—'�-rti� yA •- �•. �iC�'� .h,C� 1 .�' y�•Y" K TP,�. p''' � � � ..
4, J'
ri �,. - -:� 4. Cv!.a. a. 1. � �• •` �
Zo
s� � I��► �}�)•1 .�n�+, ��� H "� h to% � it '�y' i7 ;� '�� m
F+i
�y , $ ' --Gov
fi.,
r+ $ L 9 L ids �`ty% "
tl �• K � f-�' � 6%1:7'/ �;� i�� i �� t • tt c'�:•r.:�F�' r�
`�.1 s i��• +y` f y��y S�� .{�l-� fTY' • G 3; i "\ r !'ii aAiy r yi t
Ilsr .1. 5
��
51
' }
p n
Of
x s o r For
^ \t'

Field
No.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Soil Type
&5 B)
Crop Application
Rate(In/Hr)
6.35
Application
Amount(In.)
t� . SO T
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A
SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
NOTE TO FIELD OFFICE PERSONNEL PREPARIN-G_THIS PLAN:
The following items must be addressed in the Waste Utilization PIan in order for
the plan to meet the minimum requirements of the .0200 rules and NRCS
standards. All of these concerns may not be applicable for a given operation.
Additional concerns may have to be addressed at certain operations. These items
express the minimum requirements. Where necessary, the planner/designer is to
elaborate on these concerns or add others as applicable. Comments within these
items that are in parenthesis, are underlined, and are bold typed are for Field
Office reference only and are not to be included in the landowner's copy of the
plan. This note is also provided only for Field Office reference and is not to be
included in the landowner's copy of the plan.
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues.
2.
p.change in the opgKgtion, increase in the number of animals, method of
w ' ion or avaflable land).
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil
loss shall be no greater than 10 tons, per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" reauired by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - FYlter Strips and
8

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season_ prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine,. poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent
of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted,
low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on
soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up
released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting
of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate
vegetative filter strips are present. See Standard 393 - Mier Stri s
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways
that discharge directly into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates
provided the application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
9

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm
event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the
vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
10

WASTE_ UTILIZATION _ PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Ae. 19aalels Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: A C Dancls _ Jr. _
(Please print)
signature: �,(, C`" _ Date: Z J / 7 - ?/
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print)__ CrL__&&!YI ,_•
Affiliation:. 15aehllh C'o. Sd,1/ illa&K 2 k�&d2 D� rcf
Address (Agency): ZL S. ifleke,41_ elvd
1 is �vrg XC .275Y2
Signature: Date: �I-ZZZ2
11

r
-• .fir
p6o L!6 ; Q
' V) an y&4
co"V , E7
7Z" _ +

Brock Equipment Co.
PO Box 100
Bailey, N.C. 27807
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This irrigation system was proudly designed by John Boykin of Brock Equipment Co.
A scaled drawing, required calculations, and required specifications on pipe and equipment
- are included.
The following buffers were maintained on this farm:
25 feet from ditch
75 feet from surface water and perennial streams
25 feet from property lines
200 feet from residence
100 feet from well
All comments and recommendations are appreciated.
Thank you,
"�lJohn
Boy

TRA VELING IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CALCULATIONS
TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION RATE
I =((96.3*'q)/(3.14*(.09*r)"2))*3601w
Mere,
I = approximate actual application rate (iph)
q = discharge (gpm)
r = wetted radius (ft)
w = portion of circle receiving water (degrees)
Application Rate = 0.20 inches oer hour
TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION AMOUNT
d = (1.605*q)1(I*s)
where,
d = gross application (in)
q = sprinkler discharge (gpm)
i = travel lane spacing (ft)
s w travel speed (fpm)
Total Application Amount = 0.24 inches
VELOCITY IN A PIPELINE
v = [0.408*q]/dA2
where,
v = velocity of water (fps)
q = fEowrate (gpm)
d = inside diameter of pipe (in)
Velocily of Water = 1.53 feet per second
F q = 60.00 gpm
r = 112.50 ft
and w = 330.00 degrees
then I = 0.20 iph
I F q = 60.00 gpm
1= 160.00 ft
and s = 2.50 fpm
then d = 0.24 in
IF q = 60.00 gpm
and d = 4.00 in
then v = 1.53 fps

FRICTION L OSS
IN SUPPLY LINE AND/OR TRA VELER HOSE
FRICTIQN LQS� IN SUPPLY LINE
FL =[(0.2083*(1001c)"1.852)*[(Q^1.852)1(D^4.8656)]*(U100)]*.433
More,
FL = friction loss in supply line (psi)
IF c = 150
c = roughness coefficient
Q =
60 gpm
Q = fiowrate (gpm)
D =
4 in
D w inside diameter of pipe or hose (in)
and L =
760 ft
L = length of supply line or hose (ft)
then FL =
0.75 psi
..Friction Loss in Supply Line_ 0.75 psi
FRICTION LOSS IN TRAVELLER HOSE (if solid set ... enter 0 for gpm)
FL =[(0.2083*(1001c)^1.852)*[(Q^1.852)1(DA4.8656)]*(U100)]*.433
where,
FL = friction loss in traveler hose (psi) IF c = 150
c = roughness coefficient Q = 60 gpm
Q = flowrate (gpm) D = 2.25 in
D = inside diameter of pipe or hose (in) and L = 700 ft
L = length of supply line or hose (ft)
then FL = 11.32 psi
Friction Loss in Traveller Hose = 11.32 psi

TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD
Elevation dif. from water to CL of pump-
psi
1.732
feet
4
Elevation of nozzle-
2.165
5
Elevation dif. between CL of pump
and high point in field-
4.33
10
Sprinkler discharge pressure-
70
161.7
FL in pump suction assembly-
2
4.62
FL in pump discharge assembly-
2
4.62
FL in traveller hose** -
11.32
26.14
FL in supply line** -
0.75
1.73
TDH-1 94.291 217.81
BRAKE HORSEPOWER
BHP = [Q'TDH]/[3960*Ep]
where,
BHP = power required to drive the pump (hp)
Q = flow rate (gpm)
TDH = total head the pump operates against (ft)
Ep = pump efficiency (decimal form)
IF Q = 197 gpm
TDH = 217.81 ft
and Ep = 0.5
then BHP = 22 hp
Brake orse older = 22 horseepower

Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
ravel speed = 2.5
plication rate = .2
I:ane Spacing = 180
Wetted diameter = 225
Gun make and size = Nelson 100
Nozzle size = .5
Operating pressure at gun = 70
:Operating pressure at reel = 83
Operating pressure at pump W 90
Arc pattern = 330
Flow rate of sprinkler = 60
Pump power requirement (bhp) = 22
Total acres covered (effective) = 6,85
Traveler make and model = Cadman 2250
Hose length = 700
a, Hose diameter (ID) = 2.25
Speed comperisation = mechanical
Hydrant number_
Eff_ectivc Width
Effeclye Length
Acres Covered
1
_ _
180
_
460
1.90
2
180
305
1.26
3
170
550
2.15
4
170
395
1.54
4

BERKELIE,
BERKELEY PUMPS
TYPE "B" RATING CURVES
ENGINE DRIVE
CURVE 4117
DATE 1-27-69
PAGE 0.51
SUPERSEDES
Curve 4117 Page 0.51
Dated 9-1.88
N—W
C.I.
P-nM-•
L-1026
r.a.a. L-1026
VARIOUS
ILP.r.
mw-ow:
M-I.rw
C. I.
PdL ra.
H-180
2 r.a. r. %l-180
2
DI."
9" f u 1 I
TOIL
i.. h..w
-~a'
Maxi
urnWopk,
nnP r
�50
PSI"
p �/
❑
20
o
...�
......
. .
30
320
RP
max
um
7.
200
zp
$
�150
-»
----
100
--
......... ........
50--
a
.?.;.,:. ..... ...... TDSL -25 � C20�
-. — _
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
CAPACITY IN U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE
C-8610 T-1355 a,.a....... C-8576 ..... 4-17-80 0... 8-18-80 11 OOLL B2ZQ m
C.I. rank.. L-3482 w.a I/. L-3482 VARIOUS e/-me
rww.: wr..rr C.I. P«Lr.. T1-5059 r.u,rd M-6915 py, 10-7/l0" full *os.+w.... -...r
20
H � 11 _�.—_.
-..- __ _._..,.._..__..._... _ --
-II i� lOt
}ie:a ::..:. I ! I j :.: :'::: IL
0 ■
.55ZI 69.5x effici
400 .. - - - -. -..._.ene ...... . -
300 ..'.280'RPM
- i
RPM
200 - - --
a pm
150 ..........
100
0 .. .. .
0 100 200 300 400 soa
CAPACITY IN U.B. GALLON8 PER I.INUrE ..
C-8573 a-.- T-3753 a........ C-8513 0— 7-31-79 r... 12-8-80 moof.LB2EQHH

.."BIG .GUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
.100.SE�E$ BIG GUNS 24- TRAJECTORY j.
100 T TAP )onc'• NOZZLES
`. •':;:
Herne
'a: 4A,
GPM DIA,
.• Nozzle I
'SS'
GP A4 DIA,
Nozzle
A.
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
• '' bS'
GPM DIA,
Norzl•
.77 =
GPM VIA.
Noz[la
� 75'
GPM DIA,
Norrla
b.
GPM DIA,
N.0zzle
5'
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
9•
GPM DIA.
,Nozzle
'• ' ta•
GPM DIA,'
50
60
205'
64
215'
74
225'
07
23$'
100 245'
��
115 T56'
130
765'
ISO
273'
te5
280'
204
300'
_. " —
70
so
225•
75
238,
'e8
250,
103
263'
0 27SS
295'
177
302,
197
310'
243
335'
245'3
258,
100
270'
117
2a3'
!71W
75
315'
20l
326'
223
335'.
2f
06t10
7a
265'
92
270'
ttt
290'
129
303'195
335'
222
344'
247"
355'
1 304
3a0'
'Avallablo 9Ny with F100 6 SRt00. • • `:' ', '',1,_ : t, -
a NOz� ,.
R �N I G Z - r ,. • . .->�.""'.' . • 100 ON
L 5 S
�0 .
DIFFUSER NOZZLE
psi Ruaa ..77 RING
'OPM DIA' GPM OIA
,a l !NO
GPM DIA
•, ,06 RING,09
GPM DIA
RING
GPM DIA
.93 RING,9a
GPM D1A
R1Na
GPM OIA
- 4s ON -
GPM OIA
0.e ON
GPM DIA
0.7 pN
GPM OIAa
p.a D+
GPIA D
76 212
91 215
IV 211
LL"T �
110 235
134 230
152 242
43 154
61t 16a
91- 1a2
Ila 13rTt
1�3�1i�i
f
5�1:'$liid�E
1n3 200
iZ"!'riS'TI�4S
r40486
9e 240
5 Ill 265
110 745
12S?6o
141 270
104 275
—-
110 700
143 2
127 27S
IAs 205
103 300
lag 005
711 315
0 174 Zap
142 295
tat US
lag 320
212 325
230 335
MIS -
a
"The aTlamaler of Ihtow It lass Ice the 2l• tfllaclory anola, 6% lasts for lo!
150 SERIES
BIG GUNS -- 240 TRAJECTORY."
''' '•':
`ISO T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
'
4 {,� •'y Nozzle ..,
M!S.I. GPM 01A.'
Nozzle
GPM
DIA,
Nozzle
�' GPM CIA,
�.; N0[t4. s, ,
GPM 0!A
Norrta
GPM
Nottla _
DIA." GPM DIA,
NoI
1.
GPM DIA,
60
110
26$'
143
245'
162
3a5'
22•�5•�rn1
275
315, 310 36S'
363 3a0'
'�
7•�% ..el'..
:
'13
q312�5'
�� n'39
60
128
290'
IGS
310'
210
335,
335'
260
355'
715
STS' 360 395'
e45 410'
'-'-"'r''-'TLCi'n'`145.L:...s
a
too
t43
aio'
las
330•
235
355•
200
375'
ass
400, I 42s 420'
spa 440•
9S
1S
24
350'
29
35'
a20
395'
SOS
420'120
465 440'
460'
1 ' RING NOZZLES
RIn9 Rlnp RIng RIm4 ,
As 9r 1,09• t.Ia
RS.t, GPM DIA. OPM pIA, G M rA. GPM DIA.
' '"A a a
60 110 26W 143 '200' L 1112 300' 225 315'
a0 128 2a0' 1a3 300, 210 320' 2fi0 040,
J94 TL'^S SLT57 ^ATM6�
100 ta3 TT
300, 105 320' 235 340, 290 360'
120 157 315' 204 335' 250 3G0' 320 300'
'.'*The olamstaz of Wow la 4pprcaima4ely 3% less lot the 21' lisloclory angle,
200 SERIES 81G GUNS -- 270 TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
Ring
1.25'
GPM 01A.
7�'
275 335'
=01
313 inn'
355 380•
==ff(z
ads 400'
Rlm4
' 13a
OPM DIA.
fV" -nn
330 350,
5 o
inn inn'
.425 400'
=^SYRS
465 420,
Alm
p
t,41
GPM 01A,
1Y15 :
303 365•
say 395=
S00 di
$45 435,
NNotale
' 1A5'
GPM OIA,
N6zt1e
GPM OIA,
. Nnzzla
' GPM DIA.
Noxde
13'
GPM OIA.
Noxile
GPM DIA.
Norzlo
t5'
GPµ DIA.
Na[z1e
1b'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.75'
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
19• '"
GPM DIA.
awSaa7sa�
70
"'
90
Ito
as
270 360'
^3S'�.
310 390'
340 410,
•
bo r' as
St0 300' 355 375' 415 4t0' 4q0 430 555 450'
�3if�J9S':3I�36a""'d7' �I'�T' r' t' s7, �4i�i.3'fA�'il
JSO 4t0' 40s 425' 47s 445' $45 4cs' 625 4ns'
��a•
390 430' 445 45o' 525 4101, 005 495' (10 5t5'
. gas:
630 4G5'
ti'��,'.�'d
755 A95'
3�
ago
Sty'
715 SOS'
ess 535'
+oOS
SSS'
790 535'
�xlf2 ;TY
945 565'
ilia
590'
134
370 425'
42$ 445•
445 465•
565 465'
65s 61s•
7ss s40'
e64 sea'
lags s90
t21a
620'
200 R RING NOZZLES
1 I/,' Rimg
t 'A- Mmg
1 I/r' Almg
11A• Rinq
IV. • Ring
V 'd' Ring
2' R'Ing
A.S.1.
1.29' actual))
�PM
{1.46' aClual1
■cWail
.11b6' ■clua4`
11.7i• actual)
(tD]• eClual)
(1.93' apuaa
OIA.
GPM 01A,
GPM DIA.
GPM 014, ,
C.PM DIA,
GAM 01A,
GP1I OIA.
00,1,.....•Sss' -
5 79'TT17�
JOR' •
'�s'.1 a70 0.,;
3` 20
60�
•415 424'
S. •ii irl 'Z
Sas 4 0•
3 '��
ass 45s'
?so 3.0•
wfs=
330 37o'
4S'�"'.
305 300•
P"'?,7T'n•��n r
'=5 :.ITR
4.13 400•
.Uf�li '2�
a0
fe0
'r a
3n0 a00'
• .Yi:S�
445 420,
'�"^' 1�'^l27i'I
$15 440,
r .T.'si'�f
590 45S'
+ :-I'� YET=
571 470'
e05 490'
0
V-07
323 300,
7i�'Od^'J�
425 425'
+2'T37G7SS'riT�ScaGSrtaDir
500 445'
575 4c5'
I�Td10s�L^111G'70:SQTLYLlO'OiLTSZrO-5xTT4
fn0 Anal
755 500•q00
57p'
t•5 x�T:
Tx7f:rlts'�pSs►tY •1
1i:141 All•i
',1 6•
7''� :nn'
I r
n:'•, •,`r1'
''+4'• 41'•
6
nh+ •�.
"1
.Inalar al,lhrow la aP060•Im
al alv SM I... I....,._ ....
.•�'
.. �_
11L ,Y
Tha 010 GUN- pe4101m4nca data has boon ablalnod under ldaal lost condltlona 440 may bo ndvu4laly all oclod by Wind• pool hydl3 ulle smlrance condllldna Ot olhaf,tsetore.
Nuns- 11-19-hOm Colpo4allyn makoa no 4oproaonlallon roparUinp droplol cOn11311on, unilo+n,iry, at applicallun solo.

Brock Equipment CO.
P O B 100
r rr:'
• • QX
Bailey N.C. 27807
r; =
[phone]
eseription Pr' eEach Price
Total
-"..760 ft.
4" SDR 21 PVC PIPE $ i
$760.00
.00
-4
Field Hydrants $235.00
$940.00
1
Lagoon Hydrant $235.00
$235.00
2
Air Releases $75.00
$150.00
1
90 degree elbow $65.00
$65.00
I
Cadman 2250 $9500.00
$9500.00
1
John Deere 4020 wB2EQHH $9750.00
$9750.00
Tax
$181.50
Thurst Blocking
$100.00
Labor
$1360.00
Total
$23041.50

PHOTOCMPHS MAY SHOW NON•STANDAJU) LQUIIINILNT,
PERFORMANCE DATA
Net Rated Power
Prime ......
........*...
.r.............
23.7 hp (17.7 M @ 1800 rpm
Standby..............................26.1 hp (19.5 kW) @ 1800 rpm
LowIdle Speed.........................................................1200 rpm
Altitude Capability (w/o Defueline............ 4,921 h (1500 m)
FUEL CONSUMPTION @ 1800 RPM=
LB/HR (KG/H)
Percent Power
Prime
Standby
25% Power
2.2 0.0)
2.4 (1.1)
50% Power
4.4 (2.0)
4.9 (2.2)
75% Power
G.G (3.0)
7.3 (3.3)
100% Power
8.8 (4.0)
9.7. (4.4)
PERFORMANCE CURVE
hrr.r. Ppw.r Iwi Lar�umyl»n
Ica _.. j ... ... -L..1._ ..�
y
—^, - a is 24 � � a
; W n 21 1141 . qV
KT 6 r eo__-+v I."
SlMr�q Pww. l.rl I.onvnp..on
j 9.7 1D/W .......
s o I,
10,91 .. ....., , .r-�...:.. -
e to 74 ]]
tat lt�i Im P41
OVEERE
�� "Z�7'

h
i
r.,.

11MENSTONS FOR GENERATOR SET APPLICATIONS:
F4—
VG1NE DATA
21.6 h
W$Mh
_NERAL SPECIFICATIONS
)del .......»........................ ....... ............................................4020D
:mberofcylinders .._«...... «....«...... «..«..«.........................................................4
re and Stro in(mm).«............ ..............................................3.31
x 3,54 (84 x 90)
.placement—inj (L)...»............................................................................121.7
(1.994)
mpression Ratio» ».... ..... .«....... »............................
......................... 18:1
eves per Cy{indc jln ulcelEYhaus...»....................................................................
nrdv.. « _» __......«........... «.....,.....»..............................1.3
_.....
l! 1
union System............................«_..................................................Direst
InfJection
yineType.«..._.«..»......................_............._.......................................ln•iinc, 4•Cycle
rtranon .«.... .._ ....._«.................................................... ........ ................... N;ilural
;ine '=w Vent System ... ....... ....... «............................................................Open
.ximu. _=kc= Pressure --in. Hr0(kpa)........................................................2 (0.5)
IYSICAL DATA (Ind,da f om F} wQ Housing Flywhcd, sn,i E)eruia)
n (mm) .. « »._..«_...... « ».« « ......« . ....................... i2.4 (823)
ih—in. (ntnty .«�.: »«..» ««_ «.«._. « _.««.............................21.6 048)
ight—in. (mm) .—..».­...._........................ ................... __.32.2 (819)
ht, dttyy (power unit) —lb. _ « ........... « .._ .. «.... «...............«..
:i 495 (225)
indudcs Arrvhed Sedeetrics
tterofCravtry Loratian,
From Rear Face of Bloch (t•axis}—in (mm)........«_....... «.................7 32 (I8G)
Right of Cnnkduh (Y•uisy—,in. (mni) _....
Above Crankshaft (Zoaxis)—its' (mm)....».............................. ............. 3,62 (91)
ximum Allowabk Static Bending Meuutis at
Rear Foe of Flywheel Housing w1.5 14ad—l6-ft(Nm) ............................159 (216)
-ust Bering Continuous Load Lmir (-onvud)—(b. K.............................639
(1842)
ECTRICAL SYSTEM
omrrtendcd Battery Capacity (CCA)
12 Volt Sysrcm�rmp ..� _ ..�. » »....«....................................................GDO
cimum Alhawable Starting Circuit Rasisunce
12 Vol: System--0hm.....w....».»«« ».« _. .«».... «.....................0.D612
: et Railing Curmst 12 Volt System
itin F [D..................................4........350
t SYSTEM
ximutnAllombleTemp. Rise —Ambient Air w
Engine Inlet-*F'(•C).»...._.......... ............................ ............................. .......... E8(I0)
cimunt Air Intake Itatriction
DirryAira,aner—its. H_O(Va).................................................................25 (6.25)
Clan Air Clsner in. Ha0(kPa).....................................................................12 0)
i(iuuoras nrsd deign Subject to change without notice.
�• y
92.4 K
�• 11-- jll2�ttvttl
b-4
Ets me Air Flow-01min (ntslmin) P►imt..................................................«...b0 (1.7)
Standby ............................... _................ ..64 (1.8)
Recomnsutded Intake Pipe Diameser—in. (nim)............................................«....1.97
(50)
EXHAUST SYSTEM
Exhaust Flaw—PIntin (m)lmin) Prince.........................................._._..._130 OM
Smndby....L............................
(4.2)
Exhaust Temperature- F CC) Primr ........................................148
Stand...........................................1112
(460) ..
Maximum Allowable [lack pressure —in. HrO(Pa)........ ............I .................... 513'(12.3)
Raanmended Exhaust Pipe Diameter —in. (mm) ........
(60).......
COOLING SYSTEM
Etbinc Htat Rejation—IfM1rnin (kW) Prime ..... .............................................
682 02-0)
Stmrdby.............................................
.«752 (13.2)
Flew—bailntitt (iJttsi+t)........................................................................15.6
(60)
llrctmosui Start to Opcn-1 CQ.....................................................................160
(71)
Tltcrntostat-Fully Opus—'FCQ...................................................................... :185 (85)
Muimum Water Pump Inlet Rceriction—in. Hr0(UP) ..........................
... « _,40 (10)
Engine Coolant Capaury--qt.(L)............................ ................... ............. «....... 4.9 (4.7)
RccunimcridW PrmsureC2p—I,si(kl'a)........................................ 6...........
....... . I (B8)
MaiirnumTo Tank Tcmp—`FCQ.............•..................I......................•
•...»2Z1 (105)
Rttommcndt Air to Moil—'(C).....................................................................117
(47)
FUEL SYSTEM
'
Duel Injection Pump (Dubuque).........................................................................:..Yanmr
Governor Regulation ... ....... »_........ .............................................. «...»
«....... 8%.tna:
Covernor Type................................................«................................................h(eciiartical
Fuel Conswapdon—lbAr (kglhr) Prinrr............................................ _.._.«.8.8 (4.0)
Standby .................................
........ ».......9,7 (4.4) .
Maximum Alluwable Fuel Pump Suction
CleanSystem—psi(kPa)...............................................................................1.13 (78)•
Fuel Filter Micron Size @ 98% Efficiency
D:-
LUBRICATION SYSTEM
Oil I'rusurc at [UtLd Spccd•—psi (kl'a).................... ...................... .................... 4i:Tbi43) :
Oil Pressure at Low Idle --psi (kPa)....................................................................39.9 (275)
In Pan Oil Temperature--'F CC}....................................................................._240'(175)", .
nil Pat, Ciltacity. Higls•—•slt.(13................................ .........................................
«9.4.(9.0)
Oil1'an CallAChy, la+w---- k1l.(I.).................................................. .. ...................
_... Gi(G.4).
Total L•'n6ine 0ii Capacity wish 11hers--qt.W.....................................«..».....
.
LnyuteAgbulanty Linuts (Cunnnuaus) Any

v
.x
30 !0911
O
SPECIFICATIONS
INSIDE STANDARD
MODEL AXLE DIAMETER LENGTHS
OF HOSE AVAILABLE
4`) 2250 1 2.25• 700'
M
r.952 - 1 998
46
`;Y E A R S O F
r:EXCELLENCE
Cadman
g POWER EQUIPMENT
2625 J 1 f 2.625" 1 900'
3000S 1 1 1 3.04'
STANDARD FEATURES
600,
• Honda 4 hp. OHV engine.
• Single chain drive on drum using
• Stewing ring turntable.
heavy duty Irac4on pins.
• P205/65R15 fires on 2250,
• 3" x 5' tube Irame.
• 9.50L•15 tires on 2625.
• Four (4) coats of paint.
• 9.50L-15 tires on 3000S.
• Best quality 2406 medium density hose.
• 4 gallon aluminum fuel tank.
• Flip down stabilizers on 2250.
• Automatic gun cart stop.
• Gear driven telescopic stabiAzers on 2625
and 3000S.
• Hose build-up salety switcn.
• 3-wheeled gun [art.
• Disc brake to prevent hose recoil.
• Nelson SR-100 gun on 2250.
• Mecnanical speed compensation.
• Nelson SR-100 gun on 2625.
' 2.5" x 25' seeder hose on 2250.
• Nelson SR-150 gun on 3000S.
• 4- x 25' feeder hose on 2625 and 3000S.
•. Lift kit for gun cart.
• Speedometer.

LiriV LVLrJ JVVV1�
TOP.VIF,W OF CADMAN MECHANICAL CAM DRIVE HOSE SPEED COMPENSATION
SPEED COMPENSATION
� IrfR
I
CLUTCH
REDUCTION Box
ALTERNATE P.T.O.
WWDUP
SPEED
COMPENSATION BAR
I Disc IRAIiE I
1 4 Hr. HONDA ENGINE I
VARIABLE SPEED
PULLET SET
Q s ORIAN CAN
KANDWML SPEED
The Cadman MECHANICAL CAM DRIVE HOSE
SPEED COMPENSATION SYSTEM has simplified
the task of very accurately compensating the hose
retrieve speed for the increase in drum diameter
as hose is rewound onto the drum.
Here's how it works. A sensor bar, riding against
the hose as it winds onto the drum, operates a cam
on the variable speed drive pulley by way of a cable.
As the cam rotates, the pulley pitch is adjusted just
enough to accurately compensate for changes in
hose speed over the entire retrieve cycle. The result
is an even application from beginning to endl
Important: The Cadman engine drive system uses
"0" P.S.I. because it is self-contained and separate
from the fluid irrigated, whereas pistons, bellows,
or turbines lose 5 to 20 P.S.I. This loss has to be
overcome by a pump running harder. These other
systems usually result in using less main line or a
smaller gun nozzle in order to keep the pump
pressure within operating maximums.
THE CADMAN 2250, 2625 AND 3000S ARE USED FOR MANY DIFFERENT
WATER APPLICATIONS AS WELL AS LIQUID MANURE AND MUNICIPAL WASTE.
Model
Hose
Hose
Input P.S.I.
Gun
Flow Rate
Lane
Acres
Time to Apply
Time
I.O.
Length
at Traveller
t?S.I.
GPM
Spacing
per Pull
1 inch acre
per Pull
130
85
115
223'
4.0
3.9 hr.
15.6 hr.
2:25'
700'
130
75
130
225'
4.0
3.5 hr.
14.0 hr.
150
65
140
236'
4.3
3.3 hr.
14.2 hr.
r
150
75
152
236'
4.3
3.0 hr.
12.9 hr.
r `
130
85
155
240' 1
5.5
2.9 hr.
16.0 hr.
2.625'
900'
130
75
174
240'
5.5
2.6 hr.
14.3 hr.
150
85
190
246'
5.7
2.4 hr.
13.7 hr.
150
75
205
252'
5.7
2.2 hr.
12.5 hr.
130
85
285
292'
4.9
1-.6 hr.
7.8 hr.
3000S
3,04'
600'
130
75
320
300'
5.0
1,4 hr.
7.0 hr.
150
85
345
313'
5.3
1.3 hr.
6.9 hr.
150
75
375
317'
5.3
1.2 hr.
6.4 hr.
Cadman Power Equipment UmneU, whose policy is one of continuous nnprovemenl
reserves the right to change specifications, design or prices withoul incurring
obligation.
Cadman Power Equipment's 46 years o1 leadership and
experience in design and manufacturing stands behind every
Cadman Traveller produced A complete line of pumps, pipe and
accessories are all available from one company.
an
POWER EQUIPMENT
AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY AND IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
Sox 100. Caunland, Ontario, Canada NOJ 1 EO
Phone (519) GBS-2222 • Fax [phone]

CONTROL
CHECKLIST
1. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
2. INSECT CONTROL
3. ODOR CONTROL
4. MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS

D. Operation and Maintenance Plan - include information about inspecting:
I. Pool Area - look for:
a) Undesirable vegetative growth .
b) Floating or lodged debris
2. Embankment
a) Settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
b) Side slope stability - slumps or bulges
c) Wet or damp areas on the back slope
d) Erosion due to lack of vegetation or wave action
e) Rodent damage
I Pipes
a) Condition of pipes - look for:
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks .
(3) accumulation of salts or minerals
b) Extend out into the lagoon beyond the toe of the bank slope
c) Be supported by piers, posts, or a cradle to prevent sagging,
4. Vegetation - brush and trees on the embankment must be conQoiled by
snowing, spraying, chopping, etc.
a. Pumps - check for proper operation of:
a) Recycling pumps
b) Irrigation pumps
6. Outside surface water diversions - inspect your diversion system for the
following.
a) Adequate vegetation
b) Diversion capacity
c) Ridge height

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suarez Cause 1114 PS to Control Insects Site Specific Praclnces --_ -
Lljuid Systems
Flush Crullers • Acemnulaliou of solids Flush system is designed and operuell
sufficiently to remove accunntdated solids front
gutters as designed.
Id. Remove bridging of accumulaled solids fit
discharge
I.aguulas will NIS Crusled Solids Maintain lagnons, selllinb basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
cnlsting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 3(l% of surface.
I.Xccssivt: Vegelcrlive Decaying Ve8d llioll f `1 Maintain vegetative control almig hanks of
l ilowill / lagoons and other impoundnicnts to prcveal
accumtrlation of decaying vegetative ntatler
along wafer s edge on Impoundment's perimeter.
I�cc�l�l�
I cc1I SILaal;4
IMAS
• Feed Spilhge Y, Design, o1wrale and 11winlain feell syslcrus (c.a.,
bunkers and imighs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
Clean tip slidlage on a rouline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day inlcrval dui,ing summer; 15-30 day intcrvaf
during wiuler).
• Accunlnlatioos of fired residues f� lteduce nu►islllre accuuullalion within and
aronnll imrncllialc perinreler of 1i ed sloraue
areas by iusuriog drainage away from silt;
andlar providing adetlimic conlainment
covered bin liar brewer's grain ;Ind similar high
moisuure grain prnrlucls).
fl Inspect lirr and rcumve nr break up accuumbacd
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
u4eded.
AMIC - November 11. 1996, Page I

IIN. 'o Control Insects Site SPecific_ Practices
SIAI—Ce Cause
Animal IIt +g Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes
❑
_
FIl(mnale low areas that trap rnoisll(re along,'
and feed wastage
fences and ollker locations where waste
accunuilales and disturbance by animals is
minimal. -
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect far and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure I laudling Accrlm dalions of animal wastes
❑
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e T - 10
5yslcnts
day interval daring summer; 15-30 (lay interval
(luring winter) where manurcJs loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑
Provide for adequate drainage around niamlre
stockpiles.
j 1f
❑
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in Filler strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For olare nllOnliallon conlacl Ilse Coopetallve Fxtens#on Service, Department of f:ntontningy, llox 7613, Nonit Carolina Slate 1 Inive:rsily,
Raleigh. NC, 27695-7613.
AA11C - Novumlicr 11. 1996. Page 2

NI
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Suurcc Cause 11M1's to hifidini[e Odor Site Specific I'r'aakcs
l auusl�all S►viue producliou n Vegetalive or wooded bluffers;
0* Recommended best management practices;
Good judgment and common sense
Allilnal bo.fy surfaces • Dirly manure -covered animals CI Dry floors
1I4111r surfaces Wei wanurc-covered flours S1011 d floors;
Walerers located over slolled floors;
Feeders at high end of solid floors;
n
Scrape manure buildup from flnurs;
AUnderfloor
venlilation for drying
H.Inure C4311ecliIIII Ails •
Urine;
rf-i
Frequent lnanure removal by flush, pit recharge,
•
Partial microbial decomposilion
or scrape;
n
Undcrilnor venlilaiion
Venlilalion exhatut fans
Vulaiilc gases; i n
Eta maintenance;
Dust�('�
n
l:fficientair moveincol
Inlluor
PK
Washtlown helweell groups of animals;
n
feed addilives;
Feeder covers;
n
Feed dulivery e111►vuspoill exicitelers le/ f4cel4r
covers
Ffin- k I�►111.s
Agilatiou ofrccycled lagoon
f_1
Flush lank covers;
li1P1id while tanks arc filling
n
rxlend riff lines to near holloin of larks wiib
anli-siplinn vents -
FluNh alloys a Agilalion during; wasic►valor Underfloor NO wilb underfloor vewilatiml
conveyance
Ph ICIA1.111te faults 0 Aghatim i of recycled lagoon fl I:Klcnd recharge liI.lcs to ucar huunrn etf Mils ~ T —
lieplid while pits lire filling; with unli-sipholt vents
JAI', s1a1111ns `y, Agilation ebbing; sunip tank n Sump hulk covers
filling; and drawdown
011hidt:111ai11 eolleciiotl • Agilaliou (luring wasicwalcr f-f (lox covers
OF 1tJILCIlUl1 III)Xcs C011veyallce
Ahlf ►C,' - Noveodwr 11, 1996, Page: 3

SonTCC
Cause
DMI's to Minllnize odor Site Specific Practices
Fad of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewater
n
Extend discharge point of pipes Imdemealli
lagoon
conveyance
_
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
0 Volatile gas emissions;
j 7
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• IlMagical mixing;
91.
Correct lagoon starluP procedures;
• Agitation
ET
Minimum surface area-lo-volume ralio;
n'
Minimum agitation when pimping;
f
n
Mechanical aeration;
n
Proven biological additives
II I lgatit) li slifil3kter
• 1 llgh juesswe agilalloll;
{
Irrigate on dry [lays with little or no Wind;
mozrlts
• Wind drift
l
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
Llf,
Pump intake near lagoon ligllid surface;
Cl
Pump from second-slage lagoon
Immagu I:,uk or bassi
• Pailial microbial decomposition;
n
110110111 or midlevel loading;
sul I:Ice -
. Mixing while filling;
Cl
"!'ink covers;
• Agilalion'when emptying
n
El
Basin surface mats of solids; �J
Proven biological additives or oxidants (_
Scilliog basin snrl:lce 0Partial mi, roliial decomposition; n Exlend drainpipe oullels underneallr li<lnid
• Mixing while filling; Icvcl; ,
• Agitation when emplying n Remove sell led solids regularly
kl:uulrc, slurry fir shidge • Agllillon when slucading;
sluca,ler olitlels 0 Volatile gas emissions
1111covCled 111:111111'e, • VUlallle gas emissions
shiny of sludge fill field drying
s11r1:1�cs
Dead anioials 0 Carcass decoluposil
f_7 Soil injcction of slurry/sludges; - -
f=1 Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
n Proven biological addilives or oxidams
n Soil injection of slurry/sludges -
n Soil incorporation within 48 lirs.;
n Spread in Thin Uniform layers for rapid prying;
n Proven biological additives or oxidants
Proper disposition of carcasses
I)ca,l allimal disposal • Carcass decomposilioil n Complete covering of carcasses in burial lilts;
Ails
171 Proper local ion/construciion of disposal Ails
1116111C1aIms • luc,implcle vouibuslion n Sccnnd:uy stack immets
AMt )f' - t'lfivcuikier I I , 1995, 1':1l;C 4
r! eo hl �'4�`> �

c '1Ece Cause Ili. . s to Mhthnice Odor Side Specific Practices
Standing ice around Improper drainage; f1 Grade and landscape such that water drains
fucilhies Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Alanure tracked onto Poorly mainiained access roads Farm access road maintenance
publi4 roads lions farm
access
Additional Informalion : Available From :
Swine Manure Managemrnl ; 0200 Rule/IIMP packet NCSII, Cunnly Exlension Cenler
Stvine Production Fanq Polenlial Odor Sources and Remedies ; FBAH Fact Sheet NCSII - BA
S%vinc Produclion facility Manure Management: Pit Recliarge - lagoon Trcalrnenl ; FBAE 129-88 NCSIJ - BA
Swine Production facilily Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; ERALr 129-88 NCSI l - DAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Liveslock Manure Treatment and Storage; FlIAR 103-83 NCSI1 - IIAI:
Calibralion of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; CIfAE? fact Slice[ NCSIJ - ItAls
Controlling Odors front Swine Buildings; Pi11-33 NCSII - Swine Extension
Environmental Assnrance Programs ; NI'PC Manual NC fork Producers Assoc
Options for Nhoabing Odor; a rcporl from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSIJ Agri Communications
f hiisance Cnuccrns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Fxlension
AA1tIf: - IJnvembcr 11. 1990, Page 5

Mortality Manngement Methods
(cheer which methods) are being implemented)
=! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the °round within 23 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
J Rendering at a rende:-ine plant licensed under G.S. 106-169.7
Z Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agc :Iture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animaI's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached) L0 M p�ID T

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Mease woe or print all information that does not reuuirz a sivnat=:)
E.Yisti:lQ ar: < Ne�ti :,.or. -�-. EY : ;:..': .
parided....:(please circle -one) --
General information:
Name of Farm: A. C . Uanr, 15 Va rW) _Facility No: 3 -- 35
Owner(s) Fame: A C. POOPel4 .Tr. Phone vo.: 91910?
Mailing Address: A 6 9 PCMrr)IC 0001C15 Rd • lam. !log, HC 23aI(o
Farm Location: CounLy Farm is located in: 1=ronOin
o / tl
Latitude and Longitude: 36.a 3 L46. 1 -7 12- Inteerator:��ai�-
Please attach a copy of a county' road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions. milepost, etc.):
W 6a- -d 17 rnl le nnYfh o 1Yl+cr5ecflori SR I61$ cSR 1C,19
Operation Descriotion:
pe of Sivine No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder 0 0
.j Feeder to Finish
;n Farrow to Wean
:� Farrow to Feeder
•J Farrow to Finish
;D Gifts
J B oars
Type of Poultry No. of Anitnats Type of Cattle No. of Animals
.=t Layer D Dairy
D Pullets D Beef
Other T%pe of Livestock[: Swither of Animals:
{V.n r }- '.s Y a Y k
,Espercd:n�a Qpdrat;Ots (TnXx r ara�iii ry s� < } c
P.retous<Desr2nCarraan...- `-<artddtttonal Desren:Canact�. ::':�"ordI:Destzir`C�;nacu�...
Acreage Available for Application: (o • Required Acreage: 3.05
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : I Total Capacity:) q0`5 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on, the farm: YES or V4 (please circle one)
U YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one).
i[]It fit 14fjlKMT•wm*#aY i4K*•.tMRt#w M,kK3k is k] sax mA. mm-w--*1P.-K K Ki.
-Owrier i 1[anager Agreement
I (wet verifv that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand dye opermion
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm nanied above and wiil
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of die waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new fatalities will require a new ceniticadon to be submitted to the Division of
Envirunmenmi Management before the new animals are stocked. i (we) understand that [here must be no discharge of
animal waste frum the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conVeyancz or from a storm event less severe than the 35-year. 24-Hour storm and there must not be run-off from die
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards develoeed by the Natural Resources Conservation Ser ice. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservadon District. i (eve) know rha( any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prig .to
implementation. A change in land ownership "requires written nodfication to DENM or a new' certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 50 days of a title transfer.
,Name of Land Owner:
Si;narure:
,.- p l -5 T;
Date:
vaRe of NIanager(if different from
Signature:
ANVC -- .-ku-ust 1. 199
Date:

6 4.
Technica-1 Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Consen'ation Commission pursuant to l
NCAC 6F .0005. [ certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal was,,
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental -Management
(DELI) as specified in 13A NCAC 2H.0217 aad the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service {MRCS) an&_)r the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conserradon Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 3H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD. SI, WUP, RC. 1), the technical specialist should Only certify parts for which they are
technically competens.
II. Certif cation of Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriare box
WRC5 A.ss/STED q,va CffRT�PiCD
'LAGoe..f /^J AOWAW/979. ACCoRDiA."G
Ta D EaT►4 GEl rCA-__-D 4 Y r/rE s=1,F40
OFFicG /Z-5- 97 / DERrsr /f tok�
E xistinQ facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage capahility consistent witli tt;tste utilization
requirements.
J New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste stornee and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards slid specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): NK EVAIJS
Affiliation_ U.S DA — /V RGS Date Work Completed:_ _LQ,79
Address (Agency): 400 I CAteVA DR. SUrTE D RAc7J4N, NC. Phone No.: 91.2-.zso-ia4,
Signature: ��� Date:_
B) Land An lication Site (WUP)
The plate provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): be_ri' RrQWn _
Affiliation ,on s�e Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): jOul. &c,kc R]va L ,rj,4ur� . W 2754If Phone ``o.: (9l9) Wg, - J22
Si�,2na.ture:-Aod,-f &...=— Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriare box
Sd Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
J Faciflav with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by -RCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): r OW -I
Attiliation % a r riff Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): uv Leg Phone Vo.: qlq 7
Signature:
A%%*C -- August 1. 1997

'• I I
D). Ap
plication and Handling E ui meet
Check the appropriate box
Zi Existing or ezoandina facility wish existing twtst2 ntioligatinn Quipmrn (WUP or i)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either tidld calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment Quidance are c.-,mained as part of
the plan).
New, exonnded. or existing fac_irt v with ut existing tivaste 21MUC10i0n eguiymtnt ti,r Wmv irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of the plan).
New, vxwinded. or existing ficilitv without e,c'< ina waste-mgfication eaui melt for lind s re inQ not using,
SM.1%, jrrjj,,jtiqn (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in tilt plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan. (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been'esmblished; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
•contained as part of the plan).
iV ame,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ` Sh }} 1 / fi e G D G A
Affiliation /' L Date Work Completed: J .
Address (Agency): D. 4&/ Phone No.
Signature: % Date:
E) Odor Control. insect Control. 'Mortality yianaaement and Emerzencv Action Plan (SD
SI. WTUTP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for' this facility' includes a Waste Nfanagemznt Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Nianagement Checklist and an Emergency action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this si[e ,and Best ManAgument'Pmctices'to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
.Iortality Management Plan and the Emergency action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ?,obcr+ frowyi
Affiliation So►I r r f vu Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): ICI_511 _gickg Irk &M. LowsbNC WIS411 Phone No.:
Si, -,nature:, ,►1.� % ._ _ Date: 12/ 1 ?
F) `Vritten Notice of Nesv or Ex andinrt Swine Farm
The follo-ing signature block Is only to be used for new or expanding seine farms that begin construction after June
31. 1996. U the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that 1 (we) have attempted to contact by terrified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
wbo own property located across a public road. street. or hiQbway from this ne,.v or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property 6wners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:_ -NIA
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC •- Auzust 1. 1997 3

4f
4 • 1
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. 5tora,-e. Treatment Installation
New. exnanded or reirotitied [acility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been 'Installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certificarion is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): N/A
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Ayolication Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
-3 The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Z Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping syste:n
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committee) to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/dav/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the waste utilization plan.
Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): R k&rt EgLLM
Affiliation ✓ c Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): _K 5 Blc�eff Svo( I. isb�ra, Nt 37541_ -Phone No.: q 9 1
Signature: Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization pion.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion controi. and will submit to DE=�l a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days following Elie date specified in the conditional cenificatiun. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DE_M.
Name of Land Owner: 0/A
Signature:
Date:
Name of tiIanager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
WC •- .au_ust t, 1997

11 • • 4
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lou
Medods to minimize ttte run off of pollutants frunt lounging and heavy uae areas have bc.a installed as spCcifie ri
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please'Prim): NjA
Affiliation Date Work- Completed:
Address (Agency):
Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Aolication and Handling E uioment Installation (W P or I)
Check the appropriare block
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is o:: site and ready for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J ,animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjustment guidance Dave been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specifiers in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by 5 S/ (monthfdav/year): there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as pan of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): /MALL' h%/
Affiliation " Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):'C,Phone \o.:-
Sivnature: Date -
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have commiaed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following* the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we ) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DE.-M.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
,lame of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:_IZ. 4 3 - Y 7
Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD. Si. WUR RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 19(aW►l
Affiliation Fyurtklth 500 s WcAr laKccY0uifati Nio Date Work Completed:
Address (A2eney):10f S. 61rJk1fff'_glJd txyllhun- NC_;�7547_ _Phone No.: 010 q -3137
Sivna[tlre: . AJ r3, _ _ Date: Z
ANVC -- AU2USt t. 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
A%VC -- August 1. 1997 6

,A)
Type of Visit erCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number S Dale of Visit: q
z
ime: 14 �
erational Q Below Threshold
PrPermitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: A' j' _ T)4% rf 2,4 S County: Fxt-k a �- � e�
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: -PN C— �, P 4
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: _1 2 2-_3 'Z.___ - -
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude 0 4 °° Longitude ` 6 46
Design Current
Design Current==``'` Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
CaDacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer I
I
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
113Non-La er
ElNon-Dairya.:
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gihs
❑ Boars -
_ -
Total SSLW
Holding
ear of Lagoons JLI Subsurface Drains Present �ILJ Gaaoon Area ILI Spray Feld Area
La - - -
Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges && Stream Impacts , �
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El.,
Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ElYes � `YU
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? pillway ❑ Yes 7N,
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 '°°°��`` Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
rp 1
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: S — 3 S Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes [2 No
❑ Yes ;3 No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes EI'No
❑Yes JZNo
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
19
Crop type L. - a cp,., •J R
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
[:1 Yes
(:1 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ o
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
El Yes
iNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
4] No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
El YesE`No
o
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, wal1rr d ar�lysis & soil sample reports) tq I r-�
® Yes
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
pri
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
tf4o
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
P'No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
ElYes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
KNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ErNo
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
y yi
:d .:S - .' ..'- .4� is J�E 9 x tt"Yti
ES answersand/or airy recommendations or any of er comments: t r
Comments (refer to question t!): EacplaFs1tuati2Vhn'1'.`
Use drawin s of facili to #letter ex laiuse additional a es as necegsar fField Copy❑Final Notes ty R( P gxy Y)
.-
d7 .' ....... .. -a-
C.f1nji'�'I Ctinn Mci t1(� N GiS t�a.I G F-S c!
s
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name % C?,p:;.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ..1z Date: r! 7'k o
05103101 t Continued

..�.
..�. �� {
•,zP�;�y . 'rJCt
_�L-
,�
i3,�,
' "�
;.� N
a �. � .a'.. r'b _. w

4-
`1 -Z-1 t---or
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number S S Date of Visit: 01 Time:
ro Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted'Certifed [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 6/ t Ufa
Farm Name: .............A..5..�..... i�, � 't� � L..�.......................... County:............. �r��✓�!T!�...........
OwnerName:...................................,....................................................................................... Phone No:.,..................................................................................:.
Facility Contact: ........................
Title:. ......................
Phone No:
MailingAddress; ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..... .......�� �� ��-- S
........ ..........................................................Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:.... ......................................
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• ��«
Design Current Des ` Current ' Deli , Carreat
Swine '' Capacity .'Population; ' 'Poultry "' ,Ca'pscity..Popu anon . Cattle. Gapaeity i'pPo'tv`ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
�%
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
La Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Tofal °Design Capacity ; C
Total SSLW
.r
Nu;nber of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon❑ Spray F d Area}
It
Holding Ponds/ Sohd Traps ` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes eNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 40'1G0
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes U-No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [],No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 044o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 04o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ YesNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 3 I
5100 Continued on back

/ Facility Number: Date of inspection a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observe ? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑yes �o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ZfNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q'No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes Z�No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes )EfNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes 0"No
I Z5 7
12. Crop type v, 3 L41► J 0 A-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes FNo
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes o
J" "
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ENo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes Q-<o
Required Records & Documents (" I
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coveragle General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
z
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, free oard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'�1� yiiQl �i�njs'v d fc�encie rare �QCea g �h s.vispt! Yvit ;wl�� �t 0 *0 0o fpttW . .
comes' oiidence: about this :visit:
❑ Yes ,dNo
❑ Yes prg0
❑ Yes 'o
El Yes io
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes 21"No
❑ Yes PI"""
❑ Yes JQ-No
❑ Yes P10
I
sC i /t{Oa•�S Mo tA ho!d 1r4S0( _w6l _S 1
� s �3fl l •T. ; S:S v £- BRA � �•.�'�
4ArR-
� � e.,- s � � € ��i}t a n a �1{t � f' � •j s /g}'�' y...�rn:»u q� � ,Nr { � ' � � a�� 3�s a a3.���� t� � �����i�d�� i�'�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �,,.�� Date:

Facility Number: 3,S 3.S` Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Wes (:]No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes eNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ,0No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 21 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �Q No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes —EI-N/o
lAdditional-Comments and/or Drawings: € , �, ip
n
5/00
J

Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection C Follow-up ofDSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number E3r Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection p-r, 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......... 1..::..!......... 9.�7..!....1.5..... �'Xi.'� ... County:..../!`.^.��..7.................................................
OwnerName:.......... ...... (........... .►ql . 4........................................................... .... ....... ......... Phone No :..........................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Title:....
Onsite Representative:.......................................................
....................................................
Certified Operator:,,,,,,( C„ n�., -.a/ .......................................................................
Location of Farm:'
Phone No:
Integrator:.......,
Operator Certification Number:...........
i
........... ......... ............................I.......... .................... 1
Latitude s ®° ���
Longitude
4-.b...A 0 EETI, Epp"
Design Current
Design Current ' ' ' :' 7, Design i `i Current'
Swine Ca"'acif` Po ulation Poultry
-. �,�:` �4 -, is I ,� �..-
Ca acity, ulahon 'Cattle, E , ��' ;Ca aci 'Po ultition'
.!
:k
can to Feeder
❑ Layer
.Po"' .
; ❑Dairy
"; ❑ Feeder to Finish
[]Non -Layer Non -Dairy
` :, ❑ Farrow to Wean
r 6
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
E: Farrow to Finish
A
�-�' -
c �f k111 ➢i 3 r _i I 3+ 17 �€ Eil
t+ TotalFDeS�gn Capacfiy "
❑ GiltsWj
Boars
TOtal SSLW j''J
+,.f; ._. ..
r
�' .. .: ...
••
'.. i. r :.',i. ,.''. 4,• N ;i•tie;"..1 ° ��i 'tit
�' `, .3 �� Nu'tnber of Lagoons !tE„ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
�E H�ldiuFodsloidTraps�;Waste Management System NoLE �t
Discharges & Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... 62 ....0......... ...................... .................... I ........ I......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes o
Cl Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes �`No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
Structure fi
❑ Yes ❑
Continued on back
C7L►dcMA

Facility Number: Date of Inspectiml Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, [] Yes E;,,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ""
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑ Yes No
_Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [ qo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [:]Yes No
12. Crop type 1 �j11 A^ J 14-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes .trtvo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? [-]Yes !
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 1d't�o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes iErno
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes �:14
Ret uired Records & DocurnenLs
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
violaiigtis -or. deficiencies Were nbfed• during this'visit: • Yob will •r. eeeivtz lid f'u :ether: -
rorres�aric�ence.about this
visit .... . . . . . ... . . . ... . . ... . . . .... . . .. .
Comments (refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): /
Ile
L) - Jiz n c z- 'Ups ory 0 4,rU4(7
❑ Yes
� F
0-1 es ❑ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes PN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ;�
A

tb
Facility Number: ' ' -J Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes EPD
❑ Yes ;No
-40
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ;�No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No

Division of Soil and'Water Conservation Operation Review
~�k1jq Q.Division of Soil and;Water Conservation Compliance Inspection, eE BEd
i - i E IHl E € -fY'Ii i E'
"3 ! i {l d4 ",E, `a bivision.of Water Quality 3 Compliance Inspection r € I I.E �e I ! 3 4 E4 i..'>g�j E E s[ Ekj I E 1 i 's .. C '' [. ';_i'3 EeEY 3 4 r �q YE { I.iE
} : 3 ,d k r a J14 E � E" .� �, # >3• � a y g€" � � i;,i = � E¢E i-&� l q -Et
I ' ©'Other Agency
Jd Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Numbers ate of Inspection
TiDme of Inspection pp 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted [] Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
................
J
Farm Name:...........t....:......all��}u....jj............�C�^ 4County: aunty:....r4N.!...!.............................,.........................
Owner Name: .........'&. c.............I��.!!1 a CIS Phone No: ( j.
...........................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title Phone No:
Mailing Address: .........P... r�..... ..... .r'���Ls.. .., t c...............C:"541.k.............................. ................ ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator: ... ..... ............ ............. ........... ............ I.............................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
............................................................................................. ........................................................................................................ i.—
V
Latitude 36 •�� ©• Longitude 7®• �� J Z.
g a g Design Current Design Current Desr n Current
Swit a 3, t �te
,�,�' .,. JQOC�it Po elation ;_ Layer E.i ...."...Ca acit iPo ulation�' Dairy Capacity Po 'elation
can to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish ;''' ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
E ❑Farrow to Finish �� �i �r �I ` Ir"u Total DeS1gIt I CapaClt�'
❑
it
i
' Gilts,
'� ''�
❑ Boars " t Total 'SSLW
3 i g s ....... Field Area
Holdin Ponds%Sohd''�T
'Number of I,a oo p y
' Subsurface Drams PresentLagoonrea S Spray
g' raps ( ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System i ae
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (II'yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Discs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? a Spillway
Structurc l . Structure 2 Structure 3 - Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
it
Freeboard(inches): ........Z.................................... ..................... I ...... ........ ..... I............................. ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3123/99
i
❑ Yes Q'No
❑ Yes 21 o
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes
i� 'No
❑ Yes
E-iQo
❑ Yes
io
❑ Yes
Structure 6
❑ Yes Leo
Continued on back

Facil*ty Number.'3r— Date of Inspection J 2 3
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
. closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
R!o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
• ❑ Yes
LNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Yes
f
elevation markings?
❑
o
Waste ,application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[k10
1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN]
Yes
ttJ'�o
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
(�No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[]/No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[1i0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
E4
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
2KO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2<0
Reuuircd Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
M40
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
o
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
RjrNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
E(!No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
El"No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[a]')C o
25.
Were
Yes
any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑
2110
yiolaiiQns'o. iigficie'n. rare :r�Qtec� dwing 4his:visit: Yoit wil. eeeiye do fui•thoK _
cor'resnoric�ence. abouk this visit. :::................... I ...........: :
3/23/99

Facility Number: — 3'
Date of Inspection /2
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below[Y/yes
0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
©No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
eNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
eN0
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
broken fan
No
or blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
ElYes
[9'P o
32.
II
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? igY —19 Tk•v ks,
Yes
❑ No
Additional
Comments arid/orDrawings:
i j
c te3 It Y
7 r -, -' f
��S`
`
fl� ti
4 8�
t 3bo -
78
016
l
s-q i
F-.M I. �o.4q-
X%y-
f��-1•c.
1'Z�q - `1 �
�b0 ��-
sump Ir�-9 b u.� ¢��.-�
32.
o �� Lt
3/23/99

4 " Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation -
10 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
�] Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of 1)1VQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSNVC: review- 0 Other �
[late of Inspection 3
.:,Facility Number 7j ! l
of hispcction I cl$ � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered E] Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name) : ............. Connty: ..... 12LS3.IG.f�..( ..............
OwnerName: ............ .......................................................... 11. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................ritic:.................................... ...................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.................................................................................. .................. .............................................................
Onstte Representative: .% ...,.L. ................ ... J. .......S.. Integrator:....C.r.I.TK-4. 0-,�................................................
�%. �I,J., ..� ......
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
...................................................................................................................................................................—...........................................-.......................................I
Latitude Longitude • �
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
eeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean -- -
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
El Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JED Subsurface Drains Present - ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste NNIanagement System
Di,schars, & Stream Im pacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)'?
Discharge originated ac ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. ll' discharge is observed, was the convcyancc nrui-made?
h. I'discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. II discharge is ohserved. what is the cstin mQ6 flow in galhnin"
d. Dncs clischargtc bypass a I:j�o�nt system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & Treannent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure; 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes �fNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes x1oStructure 5 StrtrCturc 6
Identifier:
--
Freeboard (incltcs): �-
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are-t4tcre any immediate threats to [lie inlesrity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes 9Ao
❑ Yes INO
❑ Yes ZJ No
❑ Yes ❑`No
❑ Yes (/No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement'? ❑ Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes 0
12. Crop type .6E. .M.41-A ................. J
13. Do the receiving crops differ with these designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
4;1No
14, Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes No
15,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(�No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes/❑'No
/T
Required
Records &_Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Cl Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
;�No
19,
Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
P'No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect a[ the time of design?
❑ Yes
;If,10
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes/No
22..
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
1,0
51
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9144 o
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E.�fio
.o.v'Waitions or. dehde' n' cie's .were noted du.rin'g .Niis-visit:. Y-oti yvilfreeeive no further .:. :
eorresptxidence' about; this :visit.: : : : ::.. . . ... . . .. . . .. . . . . .
IComments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. `
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):,.i
A
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: //7/Gk,'fZft,4 _-f-N 1% Z� y� Date:

.r Revised January 22, ] 999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number Operation is flagged fora wettable
Farm Name: A- L acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: D Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: " / Z/� �] exemption E1 E2 E3
Date of mast recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: 5- pounds
Y
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
�4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part Ill).
PART IL 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields -fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

LO Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspLTtion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
Facility Number Date of Inspection E// / S 6
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .
L_
Farm Name:............County:...... t4A.61,I. ....................................
OwnerName: ..................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact : ............... ......................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.....................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:.-Ae'r r.L.E................... V1.e.L... 5 . Integrator:..l�.r.l.i.4 ���.�.........................................
Certified Operator; .................................................. Operator Certification Number:......................
................................................................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds �❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
.,. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon ❑ Spray Yield ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ,aUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancetimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes ,�No
ElYesezNo
❑ Yes R�No
❑ Yes Ff No
❑ Yes
PNo
//////&No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
0"N'o
❑ Yes
[INo
❑ Yes LdNo
❑ Yes 0 No

Fa c" ty Lj fit
,• 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes �INO
Structures (LagoonsBoldme Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ;�INo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):...... .............[................................................................................... t:................................................................ ....................................
10. Is seepage observed.from any of the structures? ❑ Yes dNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes RNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? QICes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes P(No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes VNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type!`................. •...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ;3No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
O�No
❑ Yes
0140
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ YeXNo
❑ Yes
9No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
ifNo
0 No.vio-lations-or. deficiencies. we renoted-during this:visit.• Yo'U4i11 recei�e.i oltirther,:
: correspondence about this. visit:- :. . : . : . . .
I to - d N xb F; '-o #ni5 L✓t �: s l�/ tT , ,,-r �1�� ��/✓L�i'�izU��
Afi-'I Al E 6V w F AEZn".4
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 � a L"i a Date: v � 1 � 1'tt

❑ Di on of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow -tip of DW inspection O Follow-uR of .DSWC review O Other
Facility NumbeDate of Inspection
r 3
Time of Inspection O '0 V 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
-� r
Farm Name: .......c......5�l.. . �'✓�.. („S I`.............................. County:.....,i r !'.r%Gl.f� ...............................
....... .....
Owner Name: .q. ......... Phone No:................
l�iw...........� .. .........................•.......................... Z ...............-5 ...�
Facility Contact: .14............. Title: Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: �"`"'t� � r�r � f 2jJ 79�t . i
.......................................... ........�?....... /......�.........................................�.............................................f...................... /.................
Onsite Representative: ...c.� rK.' t ,�% 6.AvV / �! -f ........................... Integrator: ... ."�
......................... I ........ I.....................................
Certified Operator :...--- ..... J
C-....-----r�-��l �����..................................................... Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm: s- 17 I /- /l?
E........................... ................................................................ .......................................... I ................................... .........................� 1
Latitude 0.0'0" Longitude
#' Design Current
c Design Current
Design Current
a$wtnr;,v CaA acit Fo ulatton Poultr : TCa Acit Po ulattgo Cattle`,Ca acit Po ulatioa
Q Y P Y P Y P_ 1? Y .. P
..
Wean to Feeder
O s
0
❑Layer
❑ Dairy
v,
❑ Feeder to Finish
JEJ Non -Layer
10 Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean£
s
❑Other
, �
a .'#
❑ Farrow to Feeder
€ <�T ,,
❑ Farrow to Finish
.. � � Total Design Capacity
,s
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
❑Boars
. N
Number ou / Holtlm Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area ,
No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ 4 Y
sf'�y
;...�
�:..:.
General
1 • Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes �00�
El Yes
❑ Yes W ""
❑ Yes o
❑ YesIVo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No�j
❑ Yes 2VO
❑ Yes No

'116cili t Number: — a
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldentifier:
Freeboard(ft) s............................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ElYes o
(If in excess /of WMPj, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop tyPe .[ �� l?�1�.?.1P.'1....1.?.1��'' .............. ..........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes o
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VN(o,
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities nt
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes
24. Were ar ditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes o
25. ere any additional problems'noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes o
m No.violations°or deficiencies, were noted during this:visit.• You:will receive,no•ftirther
:•correspondebceab:outthis;visit:-:�:-:-:-:-:•: :•:-: ;:•:: .•:. .•:�..: . .::•..:�:•:•:•:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 30, 1997
Mr. A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Swine Farm
869 Rommic Daniels Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Sul jcct: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 35-35
A.C. Daniels Swine Farm
Franklin County
I)car Mr. Daniels:
On SLptcrtibcr 26, 1997, Busier Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance: inspection of the suhjcct
animal facility, This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine compliance with the State's animal waste
nondischarge rules,
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance
with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office; would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
niana egm ent plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated teclmicai specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you should contact
your local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ludy Garre t
a` Water Quality Section Supci-visor
cc: Frank]in County Ilea] th Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
39M Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, NC 27609
Voice (919)5714700 • FAX [phone]
An Fgml Opportunity A111rmative Action Employer
SM recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

❑ DS Animal Feedlot Operation Review
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspection
t(jutine O Comtalaint O Follow-ut) of DVVO inspection O FolioH'-up of DSWC revieix O other
[}ate of Inspection s j[21([ 1
Facit' .,'umber
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
—1
Registered © Certified © Applied for Permit O Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............
I al'l]] Name: %� f S ountl:..... ........................... .......�......... I..... .......................
:. .....I� .......... .............�1. 4.fL .................. �r'�'' �G� t
Owner Name: ...... ..:...SR ..�.......C)11.`I�!!. '�'.� ....... Phone No:...,,51 JY.... .............. ..........,.........�. ..
'
Facility Contact: ... .. �''` `¢...................................! Title:.......... _ (` n+ Phone No :.....................-...........................
....
QL]
Mailing Address:. L).r�...1.....( !'!!!,��y'.....iM,.. .>'i. !. !� U..........iZ 0L.......... `�'.9.��8. A'5!•`............................ ....... ............
Onsite Representative:.A..'.0......... --5 Integrator:....4�`! rc� .... -$...........................................
Certified Operator........ 4 .. C...............(a.jrj n/�.Z j--r ................................ Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm: < 2 l
r�.....................................................................................................................................................,..............�.... ........................._.. ....._.................................................
Latitude �• Ors Longitude �• �° �"
Design .,Current Design , Current Design, Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity. Population Cattle :Capacity Population
2LWean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy y
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Cl Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Numberagaon J Holding' Ponds ❑ Suhsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System �
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, dicl it reach Surface Water? (II'ves, notil'y DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes j�3'N0
❑ Yes No
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �No_
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2 o
Continued on back

14.
h
`N
1
y
i
1

• F'acAityANumber: .. .
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes 3`15o_
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'
6Structure5 (L2gGons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
.... r..... ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes O-Ko­Id,
❑ Yes <0
❑ Yes M 114
Structure S Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Applicatign
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Q:�•-i�................................................................................................................................................ ...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan AWMP)?
4V 0
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For CCrtitled Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
............................
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Now
❑ Yes a
es ❑ No
❑ Yes P -
❑ Yes ,❑l, ��Noo
lR
❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes Jd o
❑ Yes 2KO
❑ Yes ;Z
❑ Yes 2d
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
"�,7�'t k' T"!`aiice ^' w � T ?'r• 3 �yi� � � ^i:. #'s
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97
\ _+

/4!lenn IBIUGWUOJIAU3 jo justapedea

i
� h
91�

If
Oil

<No. I Of! , -Jjw *!"",.I W, 0". 1

t•,
',
•1.,. � , � �' `fit x
�
o�t

14c, - I J fl) I1 .1 <,, ' : 00 1-11414-414-: 00 04 J

JJW '32-100 I-INFRO: of"

Ir

I> JJ1.1 4 o",

N. ,. J 'orill JJIJ ; 0(-i I INHHf ! cif, 0". 1

SEP 18
k
Mr. Kenn RALUG REG10iy+�L OF
FICE
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster,
I'm responding to your notice of violation for facility #35-10. I would like to explain that
the application of wastewater in February of 2000 was on Rye grass.
I use a sheet for rye grass and one for Bermuda grass and as I explained to Mr. Towell I simply
listed the application on the wrong sheet. Those pumpings were on the rye grass.
To explain the high level of wastewater I would like to say that on July 13th
it was below the "need to pump" mark. Between July 13th and August 14th
(the date of Mr. Towell's inspection) we had almost 15 inches of rainfall. On August 19th it was
back below the need to pump mark. If I had pumped more than I did, we would have most
certainly had "runoff' which would have been a violation.
I thought I was using good sound sense and judgement and feel completely justified that
the violation was caused by circumstances beyond my control.
I would ask that you consider that we are no longer in violation and was only then for a
few days because of the enormous amount of rainfall in that short period of time.
Let me say also that we no longer have animals at that facility and will not have any in
the future. In fact we are in the process of talking with our county soil and water people and have
already been approved for some assistance in closing the lagoon permanently.
Thank You again for your consideration,
llf� I
A.J. Ellis, Jr.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
August 14, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. A.C. Daniels
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Subject: Notice of Violation
A.C. Daniels Farm
AWS350035
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
On August 9, 2000, Mr. Buster Towel of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted
an inspection of the subject swine facility. The inspection revealed the following
violation of your Certificate of Coverage (COC), under General Permit
AWG100000:
Your Permit requires that lagoon freeboard levels be recorded on a weekly basis.
Our records indicate that your Permit was issued on June 2, 2000, and the
inspection revealed that no freeboard records had been recorded.
Please note that violations of your COC can be subject to civil penalties of up to $
10,000.00 per day , per violation.
The inspection also revealed that your facility had recently been struck by lightning
and that therevere currently no animals on site. Your Permit requires that when
production ceases at a facility that a closure plan be filed and implemented. If you do
not intend to repopulate the facility you may wish to contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District for assistance with a closure plan.
The inspection indicated that your lagoon had 20 inches of freeboard.While this level
is compliant with your COC, you should start land application activity as weather
permits to prevent the possibility of lagoon overflows or structural failure in the
event of continued high rainfalls or the possibility of a Hurricane to our area of the
State.
MAILING AGGRESS. 1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-I628
LOCATION. 3600 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr: A.C. Daniels
Page 2
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. Your response
should include your intentions to correct the referenced violation and plans for lowering your
lagoon to a more safe level.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciate your cooperation in correcting this matter. If you have
any questions regarding this Notice please contact Buster Towell at [phone]
Sincerely,
,�,Za
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil & Water Conservation District
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A, C. Daniels
Daniels Farm
869 Rominie Daniels Road
Castalia, NC 27816
August 27, 1998
Aa���J
E:) E N R
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-017
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8134 in the amount of $278.67
received from Daniels Farm on August 26, 1998.
This is the eighth of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
1f you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
Sincerely,
ff Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Enclosure
SUky
cc: ARaleigh Regiona1--Wice-:°
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
ti� $
Telephone [phone]:
50% recvcled/. G*/d*D st-con
FAX [phone]
ier paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 3, 1998
A. C. Daniels
D�tniels Farm
869 Ro nmic Daniels Road
Castalia, NC 27816
A,
A*_ftWW0V_%ftW0021
WL
E: > E N R
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-01.7
Franklin County .
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8134 in the amount of $278.67
received from Daniels Farm on July 31, 1998.
This is the seventh of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
Since y,
f Poup up 1 or
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Enclosure
SL/ky
cc:eigl%14Tegional-O€fice
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
- A. C. Daniels
Daniels Firm
869 Rommic Daniels Road
Castalia, NC 27816
June 29, 1998
LTI.N?FA
I D E N R
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-01.7
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8129 in the amount of $278.67
received from Daniels Farm on June 29, 1998.
This is the sixth of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 58 L
SL/ky
cc: r-Raleigh-Regional=0fficEn
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
Sincerely,
Dennis R. Ramsey, Assistant Chief
Non -Discharge Branch
JUL 2-1998 1
�I
�HNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A. C. Daniels
Daniels Farm
869 Rommie Daniels Road
Castal i a NC 27816
June 5, 1998
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-01.7
Frwiklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8119 in the amount of $278,67
received from Daniels Farm on June 5, 1998.
This is the fifth of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
Sincere ,
ennis R. Ramsey, �AsfistantQhief
Non -Discharge Branch
SL/ky
cc: (_Raleig1f..Regional_Office1
Enforcement/Comphance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A. C. Daniels
Daniels Fal'nl
Rt. 2 Box 41.7, S. R. 56
Casudia NC 27816
May 1, 1998
' &I.KMA,
4T 0
o
[D E N F=1
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-017
Franklin C0LInty
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8105 in the amount of $278.67
received from Daniels Farm on April 30, 1998.
This is the fourth of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
SL/ky
cc: IRMl igli Regional"Office
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
Sincerely,
2� - / 16_�
Dennis R. Ramsey, Assistant Chief
Non -Discharge Branch
f
I 6
MAY 12 199 J
r
TEE R R11LEIGH RCG-
,._.-
,gNAL OTFICF
Tj
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 2, 1998
A. C. Daniels
Daniels Fan-n
Rt. 2 Box 417, S. R. 56
C:astalia NC 27816
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-017
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8088 in the amount of $278.67
received from Daniels Farm on February 27, 1998.
This is the second of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
SUte
cc: tROcigh-Regional-al-ems
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
J�
Dennis R. Ramsey, Assistant Chief
Non -Discharge Branch
r'
�r
k
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
-A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 2, 1998
A. C. Daniels
Daniels Farm
Rt. 2 Box 417, S. R. 56
Castalia NC 27816
C> E N R
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment receipt letter
Daniels Farm
Case No. DD 96-017
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 8081 in the amount of $278.67
received from Daniels Farm on January 29, 1998.
This is the first of twelve scheduled payments as agreed to by the Division of
Water Quality and A. C. Daniels. Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further
action by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
Sincerely
f
Dennis R. Ramsey, Assistant Chie
Non -Discharge Branch
SL/te
cc: #Q&gh:Regional-Office
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

4. 'a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CA-_ C. -Daniels
869 Ronnie Daniels Road
Castalia, NC 27816
Dear Mr. Daniels:
January 8, 1998
1 Lim 1
1 �V
n^. Tl_ � J__Y If_ �•
I-C. rdynienl S%ricuuid lor-l_=iv71 Penalty,
Case #: DD 96-017
Farm #: 35-035
°Franklin=County
You have requested a schedule for making partial payment toward the $3,344.05 civil
penalty assessed by the Director of the Division of Water Quality on May 7, 1996. The
Department is agreeable to entering into an agreement with you through which regular payments
will be made beginning in February 1, 1998 and continue through January 1, 1999. You agree
that beginning in February, 1998 and continuing to December 1, 1998, to pay to two hundred,
seventy eight dollars and sixty seven cents ($278.67) each month and by January 1, 1999 to pay
the remaining balance of two hundred, seventy eight dollars and sixty eight cents ($278.68). You
should make the payments by checks made payable to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and mail them so they are received by the 1 st of each month.
Failure to make the monthly payments in accord with this schedule of payment will cause
the entire unpaid balance of the civil penalty to be due and payable and subject to collection
through a civil action in the superior court.
Your mailing envelope should be addressed as follows:
Attn: Dennis R. Ramsey
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
F.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If you agree with the terms of the schedule of payments, you should indicate your
acceptance by signing the attached civil penalty assessment payment schedule in the space
provided and returning the signed copy with the first payment.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E_
cc: Enforcement File DD 96-017
JudyGarrett = Raleigh -!Regional -Office
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

3r,3S'.
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
State
SEP Z 5... l r o
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OF
:' &orth Carolina
Mment of Justice
1'. 0. BOX 629
13AL_F-iGH
7602-0629
September 24, 1997
REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
Environmental Division
[phone]
[phone]
Mr. Allen C. Daniels, Jr. CERTIFIED MAIL
869 Ronnie Daniels Road RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against Allen C. Daniels, Jr.
Franklin County DD 96-17
Dear Mr. Daniels:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decision of the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision
document.
Accordingly, you must submit payment of the civil penalty assessment and investigative
costs to the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources within 30 days of receipt
of this final agency decision by mailing a bank or certified check. The check should be made
payable to the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and the mailing
envelope addressed as follows:
Robert Sledge
Water Quality Section
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you fail to pay the penalty within 30 days of receipt of the final decision document, the
Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action commenced in Superior
Court.
Very truly yours,
6a-"cr, Li.
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
F W C/so
Enclosure
cc: Robert Sledge
/19810
j

R
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
IN THE MATTER OF: )
Assessment of Civil Penalties )
Against )
ALLEN C. DANIELS, JR. }
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Be
COMMISSION R C V E D
DD 9b-17
SEP 2 4 1997
EWIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
FINAL DECISION COMMISSION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.GA and §143B-282.1,
on September 11, 1997, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
for entry of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against
Allen C. Daniels, Jr., in the amount of $3,344.05 ($3,000.00 plus $344.05 investigative costs).
Allen C. Daniel's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. The Division of Water Quality was represented by Mr. Ken
Schuster, Regional Supervisor in the Raleigh Regional Office, and Allen C. Daniels, Jr.,
appeared in person.
Having considered the record, arguments of the parties, and the factors set forth in
N.C.G.S. §143B-282.1(b) and (c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts
contained in the Director's Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated
by Allen C. Daniels, Jr., and that the Director properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S.
§ 143B-282.1 in determining the amount of the civil penalties. The Committee further finds that
there are no grounds for remission or reduction of the penalties assessed by the Director for
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
IN THE MATTER OF: )
Assessment of Civil Penalties )
Against )
ALLEN C. DANIELS, JR. }
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Be
COMMISSION R C V E D
DD 9b-17
SEP 2 4 1997
EWIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
FINAL DECISION COMMISSION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.GA and §143B-282.1,
on September 11, 1997, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
for entry of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against
Allen C. Daniels, Jr., in the amount of $3,344.05 ($3,000.00 plus $344.05 investigative costs).
Allen C. Daniel's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. The Division of Water Quality was represented by Mr. Ken
Schuster, Regional Supervisor in the Raleigh Regional Office, and Allen C. Daniels, Jr.,
appeared in person.
Having considered the record, arguments of the parties, and the factors set forth in
N.C.G.S. §143B-282.1(b) and (c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts
contained in the Director's Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated
by Allen C. Daniels, Jr., and that the Director properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S.
§ 143B-282.1 in determining the amount of the civil penalties. The Committee further finds that
there are no grounds for remission or reduction of the penalties assessed by the Director for

-2
violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0217 by discharging animal wastes by a pipe from a wastewater
lagoon to the waters of the State. Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee finds that
the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $3,344.05 should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $3,344.05 against
Allen C. Daniels, Jr., is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon Allen C. Daniels, Jr., and upon
receipt hereof, the amount of $3,344.05 be paid to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within thirty days.
This the G day of September, 1997.
Charles H. Peterson, Vice Chairman
Environmental Management Commission
i

3
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION
on the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
19634
Mr. Allen C. Daniels, Jr.
869 Ronnie Daniels Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Ken Schuster
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
This the .2 day of September, 1997.
C$.RTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT
U.S. MAIL
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
Attorney General
c..o LJ,
CAQj--
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
P. O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602-0629
919/716-6600

'.fate of .North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary ®C f�®�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director CC
August 26; 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQ>•LES'FED
A. C. Daniels
Rt. 1 Box 417
Castalia , NC 27816
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Daniels Swine Operation
Pursuant to N. C. G. S. 143-215.6A(f)
File No. DD 96-017
Franklin County
35-35
Dear Mr. Daniels:
4
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the September 11, 1997,
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions. The Committee will convene immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in. the Forrest
Resources Conference Room ( Room 1042 A) of the Archdale Building located at 512 North
Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed map). You should arrive no later than
11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
The Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the
penalty, or the entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the
violator has not been assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the
civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

. gage 2
August 25, 1997
You or your representative should be available to make your presentation to the
Corrm ittee on Civil Penalty Remissions at the above mentioned time and location. You are
allowed approximately fifteen minutes for your presentation.
Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please call Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor of our Water Quality
Compliance Group, at (919) 733.:5083, ext. 233.
Sincerely,
�.Gs•
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc �DWQ. Region"fficem
Enforcement File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MR. A. C. DANIELS
869 RONNIE DANIELS ROAD
CASTALIA, NC 27816
10
Dear Mr. Daniels:
File No. DD 96-017
Franklin County
Farm #: 35-035
June 17, 1997
I Y1.9MA,
qT
ML
EDEHNF=1
r�
HF G4t)t] AL Ut F ICk
Division of Water Quality staff have received and reviewed your comments on the Division's
proposed consent agreement and settlement for closure of your farm's animal waste management
system. After reviewing your proposal, the Division wishes to inform you that the dates you have
suggested for depopulation and final closure are not acceptable. The Division can not remit the civil
penalty assessed against you contingent on your closing the farm in four and one half years. While we
can not accept your proposal, we would still be willing to agree to our original proposal as attached.
This proposed consent agreement was presented to you on May 13, 1997 in a meeting with staff at the
Raleigh Regional Office. If this is not acceptable to you, our settlement offer will be withdrawn and
you will have the option of paying the penalty in full or appearing before the Environmental
Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions again. Please respond to me in
writing at the letterhead address within 10 days of your receipt of this letter and inform us of your
intentions.
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone] ext.
581 or Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 532.
Sincerely,
wcz.t�
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: (Judy -Garrett-= DWQ'Raleigh-Regional'Offrce-�
Enforcement File DD 96-017
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

t�v
h
L•
04,
s
b

-If
OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Hawes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr_, P.E., Director
Jun 2 '97 14:07 P.01/02
'I XNA
A&4
EDOEHNR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
COMPLIANCE GROUP
PHONE:[phone], extension 58t
FAX NUNTBER: [phone]
{
TE'I.ECOPY TO:
FAX NUNME12:_
FROM: SHANNON LANGLEY
NUMBER Or PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:
COMMENTS: k
E
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762"535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action J=rn`ployer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 1011% post -consumer paper
I
I
j .{
sr•
a

. •w
OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL ' -
RF URN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MR. A. C. DANIELS
969 RONNIE DANTELS ROAD
CASTALIA, NC 27816
l:o
File No. DD 96-017
Frankliii County
Farni #: 35-035
Dear Mr. Daniels -
Jun 2 '97 14:08 P.02/02 Jilie
'F
4aft
• • 5
1k.
CC
EDOC;kr
���
Division of Water Quality stiff have received and reviewed your comments on the Division's
proposed consent agreement and settlement for closure of your farm's animal waste management `
system. Thank you for this submittal. After reviewing your proposal, the Division wishes to in'fotzn
you that the dates you have suggested for depopulation and final closure are not agreeable. The
Division can not remit the civil pcnalty assessed against you contingent on your closing the faun in ;
four and one half years. However, our initial offer may still be accepted by you_ if this is not
acceptable to you, you have the option of paying the penalty or appearing before the Environmental
Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions again. Please respond to me in
writing at the letterhead address within 10 days of your receipt of this letter and inform its of your
intcntir�ns. `
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone] cxt.
581 or Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 532.
Sincerely,
l
A. Preston [toward. Jr- P.E.
cc. Judy Garivtt - DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Enforcement File DD 96-017
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmativa Action Employer 500/. recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina I" "r
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural ResourcesA4;)A
Division of Water Quality
r
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, .Secretary C) E F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 22, 1997
Mr. A. C. Daniels
Rt. 1 Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
Subject: Consent Agreement Meeting
Daniels Swine Farm
Case # DD 96-017
Franklin County_
Dear Mr. Daniels,
Thank you for meeting with Division of Water Quality (DWQ) staff on Tuesday, May 13,
1997. The purpose of this letter is to confirm the results of that meeting. During this meeting, the
terms of the proposed Consent Agreement were discussed to amicably resolve the issues arising
from enforcement case DD 96-017.
It is the Division's understanding that all the terms set forth in the settlement are agreeable
to you with the exception of the compliance deadline dates. You stated it is your intention to
complete all of the requirements stated in the settlement, but that you could not comply by the dates
specified under each term in the settlement. DWQ staff requested and you agreed that you would
present a reasonable timeline by which you could comply with all the terms set forth in the
settlement by May 27, 1997. Please send this timeline to:
Division of Water Quality -Water Quality Section
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Judy Garrett
Your timeline will be reviewed by DWQ and a determination will be made on whether these
deadlines are acceptable. You will be contacted by DWQ as soon as a decision is made.
The Division appreciates the time you are taking to resolve this situation. If you have any
questions regarding this letter or the status of your case, please call me at [phone] or
Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 532.
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Central Office
Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax,.919-715-6048�
Ma 10:39 P.02/03
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF: FRANMLIN
TN THE MATTER OF: i
The Assessment of Civil
Penalties Against i
A. C._Dawels
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
CASE NO. DD 96-017
CONSENT AGREEMENT
AND SETTLEMENT
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (hereinafter DWQ) of the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (hereinafter Department) and A. C. Daniels
(hereinafter Petitioner) hereby enter into this Consent Agreement and Settlement in order to
amicably resolve matters in controversy between them. These matters arose out of the
assessment of $3,344.05 in civil penalties and investigation costs by the Director of DWQ
against Petitioner. These civil penalties and costs were assessed on May 7, 1996 for violations of
the N-C. General. Statute Chapter 143, Article 21 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder,
as more fully described in the assessment document.
Without any trial of fact or law in the above -styled matter, DWQ and Petitioner have
reached the following agreement:
1. That Petitioner will pay $594.05 to the Department in settlement of the
monetary civil penalties assessed by the Director of DWQ, upon Petitioner's execution of this
Consent Agreement and Settlement document. Payment shall be made by check made payable to
the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, ,and Natural Resources at the following
address:
Attention: Bob Sledge
Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
The remainder of the assessed civil penalty ($2,750.00) will be held in abeyance until September
1, 1998 and will be remitted conditional upon the Petitioner meeting all terms of this Consent
Agreement and Settlement.

L FLKH 1 tUNS BKHNIJI - WW may i - �:j r iu - of r. uor uo
2_
Petitioner will obtain and follow an approved Waste Utilization Plan
by December 31, 1997.
f
3.
Petitioner will permanently depopulate his farm by March 31, 1999.
4.
Petitioner will have his anirnal waste lagoon and all other accumulations
of animal waste completely closed out per an approved closure plan -by
Sept rr 1, 1998.
5.
That the breach of any conditions of Paragraph 1, 2, 3 or 4 above by the
'Petitioner will render due and payable the entire amount of the $3,344.05
assessment in civil penalties.
6.
Petitioner expressly stipulates and acknowledges that, by entering this'
Consent Agreement and Settlement, Petitioner waives any and all defenses
to the underlying assessment of civil penalties; and that the issue in any
action to collect said penalties will be limited Co the payment or �On-
payment thereof in accordance with the terms of this Consent Agreement
and Settlement.
T. That DWQ agrees to accept the payment of $594.05 in complete
satisfaction subject to the terms of this agreement.
S. That Petitioner explicitly waives his right to an administrative hearing.
9.. That nothing in this Consent Agreement and Settlement shall restrict any
right of DWQ to take enforcement action against Petitioner for any new
violation(s) of the N.C. General Statute Chapter 143, Article 21, and the
relevant rules promulgated thereunder, arising after the date of the subject
assessment in this matter.
FOR THE DIVISL.0 N QE WATER OUALEE
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Date:
FOR A. C. DAN1Ei
Date-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. A. C. Daniels
869 Ronnie Daniels Road
Castalia, NC 27816
E:)EHNR
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
April 21, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
A. C. Daniels Farm
Facility No.35-35
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels,
FAD 2 1.997
} Ise
On April 18, an Operation Review was conducted of A. C. Daniels Farm, facility no. 35-35. This
Review, undertaken In accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all
registered livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will
conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly
maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. However, the
following management deficiencies were discovered and noted for corrective action: failure to install
start and stop markers within lagoon and the lagoon influent pipe was melted on top. These
management deficiencies need to be addressed and corrected. You are encouraged to contact your
certified technical specialist.if additional assistance is needed. During ensuing reviews, these same
deficiencies will be re-examined to determine if corrective actions were implemented.
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste
cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and disposal systems must be properly mai tainad al3d operMgd under the responsible
charge of a certified operator.
Please remember that you are required to obtain and implement an approved animal waste
management plan by the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated
technical specialist or a professional engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please
contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office or local Cooperative Extension Service
Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation
Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/5714700 ext. 208 if you have any questions,
concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Margare 'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Carroll Pierce DSWC Technical Services Chief
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Aw. FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N% An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

CaDSWC Animal'Feedlot Operation Review
❑.DWQ. Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Wean to Feeder
5
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
a w t Feeder
Farrow to Fi ish
Routine 0 Com saint 0 Follow-up of D= ins ection 0 F41low-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 1r/75
Facility Number 3 3
Time of Inspection 47' 3 Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: 06 U1 S1-e x ` Total Time (in hours) Spent ouReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: jj_ -6— 2/4 /u / Cy S County
�._ Owner Name: C �!`�"1 Phone No:
Mailing Address: i 6 q 2G,u.0 i E Lau AQ-„ C4 S T/4 L,4-4 A L
Onsite Representative: IL.c. A.vu-1z S Integrator:
Certffied Operator: „ C a141v E4- .5 Operator Certification Number...: $ .._..
Location of Farm:
M
Latitude Longitude
Q \`ot 0 eratfonal Date Last Operated: _.
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
. � v`' t 1'�( iL"'+''�c�'�pi 3e. �'Cs�' �`"'�" �y `�'• ' +` , �%" "k' t°a 3.:s R, �� .>
SW1IIe �ayNiimberaa':ia43 poUltiy ��� v" `Number ��.2 C3trtle "w3 NumIieT"
�..
0 Lava 0 Dairy '
�M
g 0 Non -Laver 0 Beef` � k �,P,jHR '•
-lea-,
n,....a nrm.,. �4.+
�0 Other Type Livestock
Iav r
ab Yk'`r<. '7,
< o
�•x*. -•6.: .;�`. , ' .fir ;.a., . •k. ao. ^; :y. "Sc.
.a,
oiLa` oohs !
�k
Subsurface Drains >Presee a
.��,�
Lagoon Area` Spray Field Area
r.�. ..
,,. �i". r
-
1 . Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ;�No
' 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 1;�No
- a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? [] Yes [�No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWG ❑Yes G?'iIo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? ,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes L6 No
. 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [.) Yes • [?No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes �No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstha[ding ponds) require ' o Yes ❑ No
tnai ntenance/imp rocemen C?
Continued
on back

i. uia the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)?
❑ Yes
V No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
P No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding $ands
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
dNo
Freeboard (fi): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes
ONO
- 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenaace/'unprovement?
❑ Yes
;XNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
-. immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
l'Yes
0 No
Waste Application
I4. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
PrNo
(If in excess'of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify D WQ)
15. Crop type Ua A
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
;YNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Vf No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes.
ff No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[�No
For Certified Facilities Only
24. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does record keeping seed improvement?
❑ Yes
No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
V(No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[ fNo
Corruncou (refer ttx quesboa #� E�tain aQy aasw� a�adlo%�ny �croidatcoirs�ora�iy' > m�tm±
iTse.:d>iawmgs o�Cilu�"to b�er�acplapa suu�ttt�ns.:��iascaddiiYanai.pa:a �' ..� Y � �
��4G Duns T tiFW ti7 P/PE 44Ef-o.l 7V/'
Q-s To 13 E- Pl, ,4 c co f y cc✓•u 7 `•I E Pt. d q&7c 5
pf_ta2 TO Dec �77
Reviewer/Inspector N2rne ..�.. --
•`�""•x��
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: uivtstvn of Water Quality, Water Qualit)- Serdiun, Facility Assessment Unit 11114196

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,.
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary -------
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Dir ator
April 3, 1997
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm DEHNR RALEIGH cj.w:'rE
869 Ronnie Daniels Road REGIONAL OFFICE
Castalia NC 2781.6
Men. Mors
Dear Mr. Daniels:
[DEHNFR
Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
A.C. Daniels. Farm
Facility Number 35--35
Franklin County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a Iist of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving, you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N'%
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535� An Equal Opportunity/Aff�rmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality A&I
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E � F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 3, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
A.C. Daniels
Rt.1 Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Daniels Swine Operation
Pursuant to N. C. G. S. 143-215.6A(f)
File No. DD 96-017
Farm No. 35-35
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels -
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the March 13, 1997,
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions. The Committee will convene immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor
Hearing Room of the Archdale Building located at 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North
Carolina (see enclosed map). You should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
The Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the
penalty, or the entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the
violator has not been assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the
civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal' Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
March 3, 1997
You or your representative should be available to make your presentation to the
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions at the above mentioned time and location. You are
allowed approximately fifteen minutes for your presentation.
Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please call Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor of our Water Quality
Compliance Group, at [phone], ext. 233.
Sincerely,
'fza'-� CZ0 f-v�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: DWQ Regional.Office
Enforcement File

State of North Carolina
r Department of Environment,
f' Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
D
January 31, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
A. C. Daniels
Rt. 1 Box 417
Castalia NC 27816
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N. C. G. S. 143-215.6A(f)
File No.Case DD 96-017
Dear Mr. Daniels:
erg 6199Z
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the February 13, 1997,
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions. The Committee will convene immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Fifth Floor
Conference Room of the Archdale Building located at 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh,
North Carolina (see enclosed map). You should arrive no later than 10:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. I (b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner,
(b) the -violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
The Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the
penalty, or the entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the
violator has not been assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the
civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

a
k

Page 2
January 31, 1997
You or your representative should be available to make your presentation to the
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions at the above mentioned time and location. You are
allowed approximately fifteen minutes for your presentation.
Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please call Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor of our Water Quality
Compliance Group, at [phone], ext. 233.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: DWQ Regional Office
Enforcement File

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
March 29, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To Steve Tedder
Through Dianne Wilburn
Kenneth Schuste
Judy Garrett
From Danny Smith P
Subject Enforcement Action
A. C. Daniels
Swine Operation, SR 1618
Facility No. 35-35
Franklin County
Please find the attached enforcement action (DD). Danny Smith of
the RRO observed an illegal discharge of wastewater into Big
Peachtree Creek, Class C-NSW. This discharge ,was a result of a
manmade conveyance that was located in Mr. A. C. Daniels' lagoon.
(see Attached Photographs).
During the subject inspection, hogs were present at the facility.
Subsequently, Mr. A. C. Daniels removed the animals and has
explained that he no longer intends to operate this facility.
Please call Danny Smith at the RRO if you have any questions.
/ds

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
Mr. A. C. Daniels
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT
15A NCAC 2H .0217
NORTH CAROLINA
File No. DD
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.)
143-215.6A, I, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the
Division of Environmental Management (DEM), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. A. C. Daniels owns and operates an animal facility
in Franklin County located on SR 1618 0.3 miles West of
its intersection with SR 1619.
B.
The facility owned by Mr. A. C. Daniels was
permitted as a nondischarge facility on
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
deemed
C. On July 13, 1995, DEM staff observed that Mr. A. C.
Daniels' lagoon was discharging through a PVC pipe. The
respective uncontained wastewater and solids were
resulting in a discharge of wastewater to an unnamed
tributary of Big Peachtree Creek, which is Class- C
nutrient sensitive waters of the•State within the Tar -
Pamlico River Basin.
D. Mr. A. C. Daniels had no valid permit for the above
described activity.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in
this matter totaled $ 344.05 .
11<-

i
.y
rl.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. A. C. Daniels is a "person" within the meaning of
G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is
required in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S.
143-215.1.
C. The unnamed tributary of Big Peachtree Creek
constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of
G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
D. The above -cited discharge is a violation of the
nondischarge permit.
E. Mr. A. C. Daniels may be assessed civil penalties in
this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a),(2), which
provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per violation may be
assessed against a person for failing to act iri
accordance with the terms, conditions or requirement of
a permit required by G.S'. 143-215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Mr. A. C. Daniels pursuant to G.S.
143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-28
2.1(b)(8).
G. The Director, Division of Environmental Management,
pursuant to delegation provided for by G'.S. 143-
215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties
.in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,
I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. A. C. Daniels is hereby assessed a civil
penalty of : _..- --
;te to the waters of
.ion of 15A NCAC 2H
which is _
.mum penalty authorized
$ 344.05 Enforcement costs

$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount
of the penalty T have considered the factors listed in G.S.143BT
282.1(b), which are:.
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources
of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date)
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: DD
Violator: Mr. A. C. Daniels
Rt. 1, Box 417
Castalia NC 27816
Location: Franklin County
SR 1618
Registration: Facility No. 35-35
Regional Office: Raleigh
Assessment Factors (1-12)
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation:
Mr. A. C. Daniels owns and registered a hog operation located 0.3
road miles West junction SR 1619 on SR 1618 in Franklin County.
Discharges of wastewater occurred from this facility as noted in
the July 13, 1995, inspection (which resulted in this facility
receiving a Notice of Violation dated August 11, 1995.) During the
inspection wastewater containing nutrients and pathogens, were
discharged in undetermined amounts to the waters of the State
(Unnamed Tributary of Big Peachtree Creek, Tar River Basin C-NSW).
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
It is believed by this office that Mr. Daniels has had this pipe in
place for several years. Consequently, the quantity of waste
discharged from this facility is exceptionally large, representing
a serious and chronic violation.
Conversely, Mr. A. C. Daniels states that the subject pipe was.not
placed in the lagoon for the purpose of discharging waste to the
waters of the State. Mr. Daniels explained in his October 19,
1995 written response:
"I read about constructing wetlands as a way of wastewater
treatment technology. This design system is where you have a
lagoon up front, then you feed wastewater into a shallow marsh
where plants like bulrush duckweed, and other plants grow.
They found that wetlands are removing a lot more nitrogen per
acre than we could put on land straight out. It was stated in
the article the just over a quarter of an area would handle
140 hogs.

I dug a small constructed wetland of about two -tenth of an
acre to try this system. This was the reason for the pipe in
the berm of the lagoon. When water would get to my high water
mark, it would run out the pipe into the constructed wetland.
When enough water was in it, I would pump the lagoon down.
This wetland system worked and I would have liked to
continued it on a larger scale if I had stayed in the feeder
pig business."
It is Mr. Danny Smith's opinion that Mr. Daniels does not have the
engineering, biochemistry, soil science, or ecological background
to properly construct and operate such a treatment facility.
Further, this type of treatment would requiregd an individual permit
(nondischarge or discharge) in order to be operated legally. In
addition, during the site inspection waste was observed reaching
surface waters of the state, clearly indicating that it did not
work adequately.
Also, Mr. Danny Smith has difficulty digesting this as a sincere
response from Mr. A.C. Daniels. It is Mr. Smith's belief that the
purpose of the pipe is simply to remove wastewater from the lagoon.
Whether or not wastewater was interacting with a "constructed
wetland" ddt not influence the fact that poorly treated and
illegally discharge wastewater was purposely and routinely allowed
to reach surface waters.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality:
The affect on water quality as a result of past discharges includes
excessive additions of nutrients, pathogens, and lowered dissolved
oxygen levels to Big Peachtree Creek (Class C-NSW, Tar -Pamlico
River Basin). Due to the absence of compliance inspection data
points, it is'unclear how frequent or common such discharges were.
However, from the site visit it is clear that illegal discharges
represent�,-d chronic problems at this facility.
Also, the impact to water quality is further manifested by the fact
that this watershed is nutrient sensitive.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
Correcting historic nutrient loading, dissolved oxygen demands on
stream biota, contamination of surface water with fecal coliform
bacteria, and toxic impositions from ammonia is not possible. As
a result, the unnamed tributary to Big Peachtree Creek (Tar River
C-NSW) and the stream biota therein, has had to endure the
increased stress associated with the receipt of poorly treated and
illegally discharged wastewater.

5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:.
It is the RRO's belief that this facility's waste management has
been a chronic problem. Effective wastewater treatment and
facility stewardship is a responsibility of. every animal facility.
Mr. Danny Smith of the Raleigh Regional observed this facility to
have a PVC pipe located in the berm of the lagoon. Waste was
emanating from this location, large quantities of animal waste and
solids were observed uncontained and reaching an adjacent unnamed
tributary of Big Peachtree Creek. This clearly indicates that Mr.
A. C. Daniels has not kept up with the waste management
responsibilities, has incurred little overhead cost associated with
the proper management of the waste at the facility, has avoided
cost that competitors endure as normal operating costs, and has
illegally discharged poorly treated wastewater to the waters of the
State.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally:
Yes.
Mr. Daniels communicated that the discharge of waste was not
committed willfully. That is, he did not dump waste directly into
creek with the intent for waste to reach surface waters. However,
he admitted to placing a pipe in the lagoon, he did not maintain an
adequate cover crop for waste application (as per NRCS), and
allowed waste to chronically discharge from his lagoon and reach
surface waters.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority:
July 13, 1995 - inspection
August 11, 1995 - NOV mailed to Mr. Daniels
NOV and green card was returned unsigned
Several attempts to find Mr. Daniels
October 3, 1995 - NOV (dated 11 August) was hand delivered to
Mr. Daniels.
October 19, 1995 - Written Response from Mr. Daniels
(Note: Mr. Daniels is a fireman (fire marshall?) and
explained that he'thougKthe green card (letter) was regarding
another matter and did not sign for it.)

8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Investigators =14hr.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor =1hr.
Administrative Costs = $100.00
Total = $344.05
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e.
Individual vs. large corporation):
The animal operation located in Franklin County is a hog
facility that consists of containment buildings, solid
collectors, pipes, a lagoon, and application field. The
facility -is' owned by Mr. A. C. Daniels.
10. Violators degree of cooperation (including efforts to
prevent or restore) or recalcitrance:
Mr. Daniels has been responsive to request] for written
communication and did remove the pipe from the lagoon berm.
11. Mitigating Circumstances:
Hogs were present at the facility during the initial site
visit. Subsequently, Mr. A. C. Daniels removed the animals
and has explained that he no longer ,intends to operate this
facility.
Mr. Daniels activities ha4gresulted in chronic discharges of
poorly treated wastewater to Big Peachtree Creek. This
egregious man-made conveyance, is worsened by the fact that
the Tar Drainage Basin is NSW.
12. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: unknown
b) Receiving Stream: Big Peachtree Class C - NSW
c) SOC/JOC status/negotiations: NA
d) Copy of MP Screen: NA
e) Copy of Limits Page in Permit: NA
f) Damage: y/n
This photo depicts the 6 inch PVC pipe, actively conveying waste to

IF
�11
!• rt,4,•6F,P Y,�,
,• ` mac",
`., . � a:�:�i `� r\.• .yr
r Y
• •'r L �'� f�•'n �•1z ' .V••'
4
iK'
��
S r ` 1.. •b� r
a
,v
I'
1

4098
/uyr , lva
C 5fE
Qva�.
�1
- n15 VV
✓"'348
�
n \ n �'
- I
7
161
�f^ - �f �1', 1
V4 _
1622
06L.
�Gr veVt
Cem
�\ 'V i
,� 1 I •'
a 1330
Cw
1619.
- --
U
Lail(!' a 280
f
/Crossroad
3994----------
• l
..-
.
j f�\
_
;:Cam` �} �
32
3993
Al1r—

�S
State of North Carolina
ti Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • •
Raleigh Regional Office
_ter
.dames B. Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
August 11, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Mr. A. C. Daniels
Route 1, Box 417
Castalia, N 27816
Subject: Notice of Violation
Hog Operation
SR 1618
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
On July 13, 1995 Danny Smith of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted an inspection of the subject animal operation. This
inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Smith observed significant problems associated with both
the solids collectors located at the end of your hog containment
buildings and the broken pipes in the rain diversion swales. The
broken or poorly managed solids collectors were resulting in a
discharge of hog waste and the broken pipes provide an avenue for
excessive amounts of stormwater to enter into your wastewater
lagoon. Further, Mr. Smith saw that a 6 inch PVC pipe had been
placed in the berm of the lagoon at your facility. This pipe was
conveying wastewater from the lagoon at approximately 2 gallons per
minute to unnamed tributary of Big Peachtree Creek.
The above mentioned discharges are in violation of North
Carolina General Statue 143-215.1 (a) and the presence of this pipe
is a violation of North Carolina General Statue 143-215 (e) which
respectively states:
143-215.1 (a) "No person shall do any of the following things
or carry out any of the following activities until or unless
such person shall have applied for and received from the
Commission a permit therefor and shall have complied with such
conditions, if any as are prescribed by such permit.
1. Make any outlets into the waters of the State;"
143-215(e) "Except as required by federal law or regulations,
the Commission may'not adopt effluent standards or limitations
applicable to animal and poultry feeding operations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, where manmade pipes, ditches,' 4`
r;
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 1096 post -consumer paper f

Mr. A: C. Daniels
Page -2-
or other conveyances have been constructed for the purpose of
willfully discharging pollutants to the waters of the State,
the Secretary shall have the authority to assess fines and
penalties not to exceed five Thousand dollars ($5000.00) for
the first offenses. The definitions and provisions of 40 code
of Federal Regulations 122.23 (July 1, 1990 edition) shall
apply to this subsection"
This Office is issuing you a Notice of Violation regarding
this matter. You are required to immediately eliminate the illegal
discharge, which is subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000
dollars per day. Also, you must remove the man-made conveyance
(pipe). In,order to remove this pipe you will need to pump down
your lagoon (properly land applying this wastewater!) and have the
resources immediately available to repair the compromised lagoon.
You may wish to contact your district soils office for assistance.
In addition, this Office will recommend to the Director that
the subject animal facility lose Deemed Permitted Status which will
require the immediate development of a certified waste management
plan. Also, this office is considering recommending an Enforcement
Action for the man-made conveyance which may result in assessment
of civil penalties.
You must respond in writing to this Notice of Violation no
later than September 8, 1995. You should specifically explain how
you eliminated the discharges, why the pipe is in the lagoon berm,
how long it was in place, and the date you removed it. Also, you
should discuss your current waste management practices (type of
equipment, acreage available to apply wastewater, cover crop,
frequency of waste application).
Please, carefully address each. of the aforementioned issues in
your response. Thank you for your assistance with this matter and
if you have any questions please contact Mr. Danny Smith or Ms.
Judy Garrett at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
/ds
H:\acdannov
CC: Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation
Franklin County Health Department
Mr. Steve Bennett - N.C. Division of
Conservation
John Holley - Land Resources
RRO - File Copy
Central Office -- Water Quality
District
Soil and Water

F
�State of North Carolina
4
4L Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
A16
1••
C�EHNF 1
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
August 11, 1995
CERTIFIED ' MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. A. C. Daniels
Route 1, Box 417
Castalia, N 27816
Subject: Notice of Violation
Hog Operation
SR 1618
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
On July 13, 1995 Danny Smith of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted an inspection of the subject animal operation. This
inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Smith observed significant problems associated with both
the solids collectors located at the end of your hog containment
buildings and the broken pipes in the rain diversion swales. The
broken or poorly managed solids collectors were resulting in a
discharge of hog waste and the broken pipes provide an avenue for
excessive amounts of stormwater to enter into your wastewater
lagoon. Further, Mr. Smith saw that a 6 inch PVC, pipe had been
placed in the berm of the lagoon at your facility. This pipe was
conveying wastewater from the lagoon at approximately 2 gallons per
minute to unnamed tributary of Big Peachtree Creek.
The above mentioned discharges are in violation of North
Carolina General S-
�`-
is a violation of 1'10 SENDER -
respectively state rA +CM0ate,Items 1 andlo�? lcr'addltional services.
I ,m -,Comphke items 3, and 4a & b.
` • Print your name and address on the,j verso of this form sa that we can
14 3 - 215. 1 a I' a return this card to you. a
) i a) , • Attach this form to the front of tile' ailpiece. or on the back if space
or carry out ' m does not permit.
suche r s o n I • write "Return Receipt Requested" on ti;e meilpiece below the article number
p �" • The Return Receipt will show to whom the -drticle was delivered and the date
Commission a p' delivered.
I 3. Article Addressed to:
4a. An
conditions, i m11 1 Make an o1 m Mir. A..C.' Daniels Q4
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an extra
fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.._.
le Number
y E Rout t o 1 B o x 41 7 4b. Service Type
l E ❑ Registered
143-215(e) t0 Castalia, NC 27816 certified
the Commissio)C� w Nov IS,S.L 3,6t, 1k.s El Express Mail
applicable t! 0 Auq 7, Dete of sliver+
Notwithstandi a 3
5. Signature (Address8. Addressee's Ad
i CC = and fee is paid}
38)0 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, l w
AEqual opportunity
;; 6. Signature (Agent)
n E q i '3
0
❑ insured
❑ COD
❑ Return
(Only
v>
;eipt for 0=
se o
0
-3
0
a
requested �e
c
m
r
F—
T PS Form 3811, December 1991 *U.S.GPoilea3--M2-714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

J ;L-1-4-199S IS: 26 FPQM r1Ft'1 WATER DUAL I TY SCLT I cN TO
RRO P.O2/02
Site Requires hmmediate:Attcnt5()r•'�
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIIt I FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -' �-1 ; 1995
Time:
i, Y-) /
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: _
County:
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone-
Phvsical Address/Locadon:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE
DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Ladrude: - Longitude: Elevation: _________Feet
Circle Yes or No
Dods the Animal Waste Lagoon have su£ficienr freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
,approxiroateiv 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes. or Actual Freeboard: Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or �i Was any emsion observed? Yes oN
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or o
Crop(s) being utilized.:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings?�or No
100 Feet from Wells? Ly9or No
anirnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or& .
a:ti.mal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or 60
animal waste discharged into w tees of the state by rnan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
-;imi!ar rnan-:nude devices'? Pe or No if.Yes. Please ExpJaiti_
,,, thr- faLility rbaintain adequate waste management records (volumes of ruanure, land applied -
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'' Yes or Rio
Additional Con menuz
cc: Facility Asscssmeac Unit
11 e-2
IIx ✓ - `r -4
/ Use Attachments if Needed -
TOTAL P.02

M
October 19,1995
Mr. Danny Smith
Raleigh Regional Office
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
SUBJECT. Notice of Violation
Hog Operation
SR 1618
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Smith:
On January 30, 1995, I was employed by the State of North Carolina Department of
Insurance. At that time, my wife and I decided to close our hog operation, after farrowing all
sows. This was completed on August 1, 1995. Our decision was made not to continue in the
swine business, because of the poor condition of our building and cost of remodeling. Our plans
at that time was to close down the lagoon.
We are planning on taking out the old pipes that flow wastewater to the lagoon from
breeding, gestation and farrowing houses to help stop the avenue from excessive amounts of
storrawater from entering into the lagoon. The six inch PVC pipe that was placed in the lagoon
was removed on October 4, 1995. This pipe was not placed into the lagoon as a "willfully
discharging, pollutants to the waters of the State".
I read about constructing wetlands as a way of wastewater treatment technology. This
design system is where you have a lagoon up front, then you feed wastewater into a shallow marsh
where plants like bullrush, duckweed and other plants grow. They found that wetlands are
removing a lot more nitrogen per acre than we could put on land straight out. It was stated in the
article that just over a quarter of an area would handle 140 hogs.
I dug a small constricted wetland of about two -tenth of an acre to try this system. This
was the reason for the pipe in the beam of the lagoon. When the water would get to my high
water mark, it would rum out the pipe into the constructed wetland. When enough water was in it,
I would pump the lagoon down. This would stop water from entering the wetland. This wetland
system worked and I would have liked to continued it on a larger scale if I had stayed in the feeder
pig business.

Mr. Danny Smith
October 19, 1995
Page Two
. My current waste management practices ate. (1) to use a irrigation system with a 100
nellson guns, about 1" of water per acre every throe hours, cover five -tenths of an acre of land per
setting; (2) I have 10.5 acres of coasted be ramuda grass to apply wastewater on. This is twice the
amount of land that soil consmvation stated that needed; (3) I will be applying wastewater to the
grass when the water level in my lagoon reaches one foot below high water mark or after every cut
of grass.
I may have made some mistakes in the past, but none of these were intended. I will do
what is needed to keep the system managed in the future according to the law. I ask of you, your
help and cooperation to accomplish this without any civil, penalties. This would only cause
oxtrmne financial difficulties for my family.'
Sincerely,
a, (?- P-.eL-jl
A.C. Daniels

OPERATIONS BRRgCH - WO Fax :[phone]
Aug 7 '95 10:17 P.01/02
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 7, 1995
MEMORANDUM: >
To: Regional. Water Quality Supervisors
From: Dann Williams Wilburnw)
ALT.
EDEHN1=1
Post -it` Fax Note .7671
Dale
awes �. 2-
Tel n
Ftvm .
Co,IDepL
Ca.
Phone #
Phone it
q1R 73 S©d 7.
Fax #
Fax #
Subject: Information from Regions
Ani real Operations
Please find attached a note from Steve Tedder. He has a meeting with the Governor's Office at
5'00 today. -Please provide the following information and fax to me by 2:00 today. Please feel free
_ to hand write the information.
NrmNameAr, / < Owner Name. -
Responsible Party (if different from Owner):
Location: Cry 3 ,`.
County: r/; Z' rL Fish Kill: Yes or 1oCircle One)
Type and Amount of Waste Spilled: � t-�

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: DD
Violator: Mr. A. C. Daniels
Rt. 1, Box 417
Castalia NC 27816
Location: Franklin County
SR 1618
Registration: Facility No. 35-35
Regional Office: Raleigh
Assessment Factors (1-12)
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation:
Mr. A. C. Daniels owns and registered a hog operation located 0.3
road miles West junction SR 1619 on SR 1618 in Franklin County.
Discharges of wastewater occurred from this facility as noted in
the July 13, 1995, inspection (which resulted in this facility
receiving a Notice of Violation dated August 11, 1995.) During the
inspection wastewater containing nutrients and pathogens, were
discharged' in undetermined amounts to the waters of the State
(Unnamed Tributary of Big Peachtree Creek, Tar River Basin C-NSW).
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
It is believed by this office that Mr. Daniels has had this pipe in
place for several years. Consequently, the quantity of waste
discharged from this facility is exceptionally large, representing
a serious and chronic violation.
Conversely, Mr. A. C. Daniels states that the subject pipe was not
placed in the lagoon for the purpose of discharging waste to the
waters of the State. Mr. Daniels explained in his October 19,
1995 written response:
"I read about constructing wetlands as a way of wastewater
treatment technology. This design system is where you have a
lagoon up front, then you feed wastewater into a shallow marsh
where plants like bulrush duckweed, and other plants grow.
They found that wetlands are removing a lot more nitrogen per
acre than we could put on land straight out. It was stated in
the article the just over a quarter of an area would handle
140 hogs.

I dug a small constructed wetland of about two -tenth of an
acre to try this system. This was the reason for the pipe in
the berm of the lagoon. When water would get to my high water
mark, it would run out the pipe into the constructed wetland.
When enough water was in it, I would pump the lagoon down.
This wetland system worked and I would have liked to
continued it on a larger scale if I had stayed in the feeder
pig business."
It is Mr. Danny Smith's opinion that Mr. Daniels does not have the
engineering, biochemistry, soil science, or ecological background
to properly construct and operate such a treatment facility.
Further, this type of treatment would required an individual permit
(nondischarge or discharge) in order to be operated legally. In
addition, during the site inspection waste was observed reaching
surface waters of the state, clearly indicating that it did not
work adequately.
Also, Mr. Danny Smith has difficulty digesting this as a sincere
response from Mr. A.C. Daniels. It is Mr. Smith's belief that the
purpose of the pipe is simply to remove wastewater from the lagoon.
Whether or not wastewater was interacting with a "constructed
wetland" dose not influence the fact that poorly treated and
illegally discharge wastewater was purposely and routinely allowed
to reach surface waters.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality:
The affect on water quality as a result of past discharges includes
excessive additions of nutrients, pathogens, and lowered dissolved
oxygen levels to Big Peachtree Creek (Class C-NSW, Tar -Pamlico
River Basin). Due to the absence of compliance inspection data
points, it is unclear how frequent or common such discharges were.
However, from the site visit it is clear that illegal discharges
represents a chronic problems at this facility.
Also, the impact to water quality is further manifested by the fact
that this watershed is nutrient sensitive.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
Correcting historic nutrient loading, dissolved oxygen demands on
stream biota, contamination of surface water with fecal coliform
bacteria, and toxic impositions from ammonia is not possible. As
a result, the unnamed tributary to Big Peachtree Creek (Tar River
C-NSW) and the stream biota therein, has had to endure the
increased stress associated with the receipt of poorly treated and
illegally discharged wastewater.

5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
It is the RRO's belief that this facility's waste management has
been a chronic problem. Effective wastewater treatment and
facility stewardship is a responsibility of every animal facility.
Mr. Danny Smith of the Raleigh Regional observed this facility to
have a PVC pipe located in the berm of the lagoon. Waste was
emanating from this location, large quantities of animal waste and
solids were observed uncontained and reaching an adjacent unnamed
tributary of Big Peachtree Creek. This clearly indicates that Mr.
A. C. Daniels has not kept up with the waste management
responsibilities, has incurred little overhead cost associated with
the proper management of the waste at the facility, has avoided
cost that competitors endure as normal operating costs, and has
illegally discharged poorly treated wastewater to the waters of the
State.
5. Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally:
Yes.
Mr. Daniels communicated that the discharge of waste was not
committed willfully. That is, he did not dump waste directly into
creek with the intent for waste to reach surface waters. However,
he admitted to placing a pipe in the lagoon, he did not maintain an
adequate cover crop for waste application (as per NRCS), and
allowed waste to chronically discharge from his lagoon and reach
surface waters.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority:
July 13, 1995 - inspection
August 11, 1995 - NOV mailed to Mr. Daniels
NOV and green card was returned unsigned
Several attempts to find Mr. Daniels
October 3, 1995 - NOV (dated 11 August) was hand delivered to
Mr. Daniels.
October 19, 1995 - Written Response from Mr. Daniels
(Note: Mr. Daniels is a fireman (fire marshall?) and
explained that he though the green card (letter) was regarding
another matter and did not sign for it.)

8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Investigators
=14hr.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor =lhr.
Regional Supervisor =1hr.
Administrative Costs = $100.00
Total =
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e.
Individual vs. large corporation):
The animal operation located in Franklin County is a hog
facility that consists of containment buildings, solid
collectors, pipes, a lagoon, and application field. The
facility is owned by Mr. A. C. Daniels.
10. violators degree of cooperation (including efforts to
prevent or restore) or recalcitrance:
Mr. Daniels has been responsive to request for written
communication and did remove the pipe from the lagoon berm.
11. Mitigating Circumstances:
Hogs were present at the facility during the initial site
visit. Subsequently, Mr. A. C. Daniels removed the animals
and has explained that he no longer intends to operate this
facility.
Mr. Daniels activities has resulted in chronic discharges of
poorly treated wastewater to Big Peachtree Creek. This
egregious man-made conveyance, is worsened by the fact that
the Tar Drainage Basin is NSW.
12. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: unknown
b) Receiving Stream: Big Peachtree Class C - NSW
c) SOC/JOC status/negotiations: NA
d) Copy of MP Screen: NA
e) Copy of Limits Page in Permit: NA
f) Damage: y/n

A.C. Daniels Farm
These photos shows a 6 inch PVC discharging lagoon waste that flows
into an area inundated with wastewater and solids which then flows
into the adjacent unnamed tributary of Big Peachtree Creek.

ew DSWC An>lmal Feedlot Operat>on:Revi
w.
k f:
3 'DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspec1011 x.,. .
O Routine O Com Taint O Follow-up of MVQ inspection O Follow-uD of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number S_ 3 S Time of Inspection' ® Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
__........................................................... or Inspection.(includes travel and processing)
Farm Nante:.fT{c..;f. (.!.........Counh':............................... ......................
...�... �..._..... ............._.. .
Owner Name: .../�1,��.....,(.I:.rz.�:::..� Phone No:�.. �. ....Zlv`rj...�
Mailing Address:.....U..� a/ ! f 1� .... `....1......_�: � .. L._ `! � .... ..T..11_..!„ ........ _..............
?. /..._ / ........... /
Onsite Representative:A...1ntegrator: '7j-ZC4 .............................
0*/4--7
Certified Operator• C ..... Operator Certification Number:
1lt.l...l��..t�.�`:.....5...... c................ ...........
Location of Farm;
Latitude 0 C.44 Longitude • f °°
❑ Not Operational hate Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity 'Kv
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finisl
❑ Other Type of Livestock
Beef
Numbertof Lagoons / Holtltng Ponds / > ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 0-55
aU,❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
{U 44,
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? % ❑ Yes *No
2. is a v discharge obsery fro any pan of the operation? A-e; /! ao� iLvS G �` `� G 5 ❑ Yes �No
7�-
a' If dischar ge is oVs6rved, was the conveyance man-made? t/ ❑Yes [!5Na
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface: Water? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes U�Noo
c. If discharge is observed, -what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? -9[ Yes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes ❑ No
5. Does anv p rt of th as management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require R Yes ❑ No
c� ��� maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes --2�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? ❑ Yes NNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes I No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdin; Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? Yes [SrNO
Freeboard (ft.): SLLago;ori Lagoon 2 La_oon 3 Lagoon 4
— ..... -....... _.r..... ....... _-............. _....._._..... _............
.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes NCNo
I I- Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes }�No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? j] Yes nr:&o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumpif g leve s? ] Yes ❑ No
s� /`J�; zC...,aiJ�GilaYi`t�7�L1L_ �CGayv �iCOvtnO/•
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 9No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
j
15. Crop type ..G(�'LG/r_ J /
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑ Yes - ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? /Vaal r ❑ Yes 9No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipments?!
For Certified Facilities Only ly/ /__ ,Z
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in anyway?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
la Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
-
Comments (refer to q�iest�on�#} Explain any;,YES a>tswers andfor any recommendations or aay-other cornments�' '��" :�``
-Z7se drawings ofxfacill to better exr�IaIn 5Itilatlon5 (use additional a es as�necess ��� �°°� � � � °��=� � �' � ��:
,•r!
C-s .5
a
Reviewer/lnspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector•Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Crater Qualin, Section, Facility Assessment Unit l 1/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr_ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
A.C. Daniels
A.C. Daniels Farm
869 Ronnie Daniels Road
Castalia NC 27816-
e��
EDEHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: A.C. Daniels Farm
Facility ID#: 35-35
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincer ,
_j
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, P4.CRaleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

- State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
ATTN: A. C. Daniels
Route 2, Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
Dear Mr. Daniels:
AFT
C) E I--1 N R
August 22, 1996
AUG 2 2 1996
D£HNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Daniels Swine Farm
SFranklin`_County]
DD 96-17
I considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and my delegation under G.S. 143-215.6A(h) and have not
found grounds to modify the assessment of $3,344.05.
Should you choose to pay the penalty, you may tender payment to me at the letterhead
address within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these matters.
You may argue your request before the committee and Division Staff will argue for full payment of
the initial assessment.
Should you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the
letterhead address on or before within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Your request will be
scheduled to be heard on the agenda of the next scheduled committee meeting and you will be
notified of the date and time. If a response is not received by the Division regarding this notice
then your request will be scheduled on the agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions about this letter,
please feel free to contact Shannon Langley at [phone], extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston How
cc:�DWQ Reg onal.Office.,-
Enforcement file

State of North Carolina
' Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 16, 1996
Attn.: A. C. Daniels
Route 2, Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
1••
r �
[)FHNF=1
Subject: Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
Daniels Swine farm
Franklin County
DD 96-17
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalty levied against
the subject facility. This request will be reviewed and you will be notified when a decision is
made concerning the request.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
, frl. 0, 10; �-- J Wr
Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor
Compliance Group
cc: Raleigh Regional Office w/attachments
Enforcement/Compliance
C,LindaFoiehand w13 attachments
R.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ft gaf I * '✓
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMITYIISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. 019 _ 7 6 -17
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling 3 Lf-, os for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management dated, S - 7 - the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of
the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter
and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the 1 _ day of J'w 197�
BY
ADDRESS
9 off e Z
Gffj -r#- /,`;q- '-V. C- z7Sl-6
TELEPHONE
cv V 5 5� - '� I d-z—

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 20, 1996 nwvED
JUL 1 0 1996
I'Ar" (TIES ASSESSMENT UNIT
A.C. Daniels
Route 2 Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
Subject: Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
A.C. Daniels Farm
Franklin County
DD 96-17
Dear Mr. Daniels:
The Division of Environmental Management is in receipt of your request for remission of
civil penalties assessed in the matter of the case noted above. However, your remission request
was not accompanied by a completed form waiving your right to an administrative hearing, which
must be received before your request may be processed. Please complete the attached waiver form
and return it to the attention of Mr. Shannon Langley at the letterhead address. Once the completed
waiver form has been received, the Division will be able to proceed with your remission request.
If you have any questions, please call Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
1753
Sincerely,
Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor
Compliance Group
cc: Enforcement/Compliance
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

&OwI ?3 n %
June 10, 1996
1WATER QUALITY SE6il�l�
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DEM JUN I0
Post Office Box 29535 - , r'; `t'OPF�ATM!S F�PANrH
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Tedder;
I received a letter dated May 12, 1996, from Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr. The subject of
assessment of civil penalties for violation of NC General Statute 143-215. - I am located in
Franklin County, my file number is DD96-17 and Farm number 35-35.
. I was given three options: Submit payment of the penalty, submit a written request for
remission or mitigation, or submit a written request for an administrative hearing. I have been
advised by other producers to request an administrative hearing but after talking with some of
your staff, I was advised that I may need a lawyer to plead my case. With this information and my
financial condition, which is that Ijam unable to pay the penalty or a lawyer, I must select option
number 2, request for remission or mitigation.
On January 30, 1995, 1 was employed by the State of North Carolina Department of
Insurance. At that time, my wife and I decided to close our hog operation, after furrowing all
sows. This was completed on August 1, 1995. Our decision was made not to continue in the
swine business, because of the poor condition of our buildings and cost of remodeling. Our plans
at that time was to close down the lagoon.
We have taken out all old pipes .that run from the buildings to the lagoon, to stop any
avenue for storm water or waste water to get to the lagoon except for what rains into it.
The six inch PVC pipe that was placed in the dam of the lagoon, was removed on October
4, 1995. This pipe was not placed into the lagoon as a "willfully discharging of pollutants to the
waters of the State of North Carolina. I will explain this further in this letter.
After talking with Mr. Smith at the Raleigh Regional office about the requirement to close
our lagoon, we feel that we can't afford to do this. I have applied and have been approved for a
grant with the Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District for a set irrigation system
that will make the job of irrigating the waste water on my 10.5 acres of Coastal Bermuda grass
more convenient, since I will need to continue irrigating in the future.. The cost of this system
will be between $18,000.00 - $20,000.00. My portion of this payment will be 25%. This is one
of the reasons I have requested a remission of the civil penalty because I cannot afford to pay the
civil penalty and my portion of the Grant from my salary with the State.
I would like to address one other issue that's important to me. I have tried to do what is
right, have worked with my County Soil Conservation Office and any other state agency that they
requested me to work with. - I keep my lagoon pumped off as needed with an irrigation system
that was used to irrigate tobacco, however, this system will not be available for use much longer.
This is the reason for a set system.

Since 1979, the year I went into the hog business, I never had any waste water from the
lagoon or irrigation system get into the creek next to my buildings. If there has been a mistake
made, it was the building of a constructed wetland which was the purpose of the 6" pipe in the
dam of my lagoon without permission from anyone. I did mention this to the Franklin County
Soil Conservation people, but they indicated that they did not foresee any problem with this as
long as no waste water got into the creek. I read in a farm magazine about constructing wetland
as a way of waste water treatment technology. This design system is where you have a lagoon up
front, then you feed wastewater into shallow marshes where plants such as bulrush, duckweed
and others grow. They found that wetland removed a lot more nitrogen per acre than we could
by applying waste water to grass land. It was stated in the article that just over a quarter of
wetland acre would handle 140 hogs.
I dug a small constructed wetland of about .2 acre to try this system. This was the reason
for the pipe in the dam of the lagoon. When the waste water would arrive at my high water mark,
it would run through the 6" PVC pipe into the constructed wetland. When enough water was in
the constructed wetland, I would pump the lagoon down. This would stop water from entering
the wetland. There was a 3 foot dam around the constructed wetland with a 4 foot dam around
the constructed wetland, with a 4 foot dig on the inside. There was no way for water to get out
of the wetland. I include a diag_raU of this system and my lagoon with this letter.
I may have made mistakes in the past, but none of there were intended. I will do what is
needed to keep my lagoon managed in the future according to the laws of North Carolina. I ask
of you your cooperation to accomplish this without any penalty or as must relief as possible. The
penalty would only cause extreme financial difficulties for my family.
Your help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
A. C. Daniels
Route 2, Box 417
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Iacd
Enclosure
..1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
\�
n James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
`` Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 16, 1996
Attn.: A. C. Daniels
Route 2, Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
& NATURAL RF;SOURCE;S
Jiff 17 1996
DIVISION OF INVIROHMMUL MkflMMEpt
KOHISlft I REGIONAL OFF19f
Subject: • Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
Daniels Swine farm
Franklin County
DD 96-17
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalty levied against
the subject facility. This request will be reviewed and you will be notified when a decision is
matte concerning the request.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Shannon Langley at (919)
Sincerely,
�,f.dX Y-vy
Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor
Compliance Group
cc: CRaleigh,Regional_Oce w/attachmen�ts�
Enforcement/Compliance
Linda Forehand w/3 attachments
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF — --- - r r A.v�C I_ t coM�sszoN _�_ � .,._ .
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PP 7 -17
Having been assessed civil penalties totallingJ7 3 `� f for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management dated, S - 7 - q _ , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of
the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter
and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the --_.`.-day of ZT-,v 19�
BY
GRja 1"� . C. z7Sl.d
TELEPHONE
CF/Y) 5 5�- '3I d-L-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division. of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 20, 1996 RLwvED
JUL 1 0 1996
Epr" tTIES ASSESSMENT UNIT
A.C. Daniels
Route 2 Box 417
Castalia, NC 27816
Subject: Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
i A.C. Daniels Farzi
- Franklin -County
DD 96-17
Dear Mr. Daniels:
The Division of Environmental Management is in receipt of your request for remission of
civil penalties assessed in the matter of the case noted above. However, your remission request
was not accompanied by a completed form waiving your right to an administrative hearing, which
must be received before your request may be processed. Please complete the attached waiver form
and return it to the attention of Mr. Shannon Langley at the letterhead address. Once the completed
waiver form has been received, the Division will be able to proceed with your remission request.
If you have any questions, please call Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely, r?
Robert L. Sledge, Supervisor
Compliance Group
cc: Enforcement/CompLance
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

June 10, 1996
RECEIVE
'WATER QcAUiY dE6 10N
r
Mr. Steve W. Tedder{ _
Water Quality Section Chief/DEM JUN 10
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535°�Ra.��nn�c r�Rnr�
Dear Mr. Tedder:
I received a letter dated May 12, 1996, from Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr. The subject of
assessment of civil penalties for violation of NC General Statute 143-215. I am located in
Franklin County, my file number is DD96-17 and Farm number 35-35.
I was given three options: Submit payment of the penalty, submit a written request for
remission or mitigation, or submit a written request for an administrative hearing. I have been
advised by other producers to request an administrative hearing but after talking with some of
your staff, I was advised that I may need a lawyer to plead my case. With this information and my
financial condition, which is that Iam unable to pay the penalty or, a lawyer, I must select option
number 2, request for remission or mitigation.
On January 30, 1995, I was employed by the State of North Carolina Department of
Insurance. At that time, my wife and I decided to close our hog operation, after furrowing all
sows. This was completed on August 1, 1995. Our decision was made not to continue in the
swine business, because of the poor condition of our buildings and cost of remodeling. Our plans
at that time was to close down the lagoon.
We have taken out all old pipes that run from the buildings to the lagoon, to stop any
avenue for storm water or waste water to get to the lagoon except for what rains into it.
The six inch PVC pipe that was placed in the dam of the lagoon, was removed on October
4, 1995. This pipe was not placed into the lagoon as a "willfully discharging of pollutants to the
waters of the State of North Carolina. I will explain this further in this letter.
After talking with Mr. Smith at the Raleigh Regional office about the requirement to close
our lagoon, we feel that we can't afford to do this. I have applied and have been approved for a
grant with the Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District for a set irrigation system
that will make the job of irrigating the waste water on my 10.5 acres of Coastal Bermuda grass
more convenient, since I will need to continue irrigating in the future. The cost of this system
will be between $18,000.00 - $20,000.00. My portion of this payment will be 25%. This is one
of the reasons I have requested a remission of the civil penalty because I cannot afford to pay the
civil penalty and my portion of the Grant from my salary with the State.
I would like to address one other issue that's important to me. I have tried to do what is
right, have worked with my County Soil Conservation Office and any other state agency that they
requested me to work with. I keep my lagoon pumped off as needed with an irrigation system
that was used to irrigate tobacco, however, this system will not be available for use much longer.
This is the reason for a set system.

Since 1979, the year I went into the hog business, I never had any waste water from the
lagoon or irrigation system get into the creek next to my buildings. If there has been a mistake
made, it was the building of a constructed wetland which was the purpose of the 6" pipe in the
dam of my lagoon without permission from anyone. I did mention this to the Franklin County
Soil Conservation people, but they indicated that they did not foresee any problem with this as
long as no waste water got into the creek. I read in a farm magazine about constructing wetland
as a way of waste water treatment technology. This design system is where you have a lagoon up
front, then you feed wastewater into shallow marshes where plants such as bulrush, duckweed
and others grow. They found that wetland removed a Iot more nitrogen per acre than we could
by applying waste water to grass land. It was stated in the article that just over a quarter of
wetland acre would handle 140 hogs.
I dug a small constructed wetland of about .2 acre to try this system. This was the reason
for the pipe in the dam of the Iagoon. When the waste water would arrive at my high water mark,
it would run through the 6" PVC pipe into the constructed wetland. When enough water was in
the constructed wetland, I would pump the lagoon down. This would stop water from entering
the wetland. There was a 3 foot dam around the constructed wetland with a 4 foot dam around
the constructed wetland, with a 4 foot dig on the inside. There was no way for water to get out
of the wetland. I include a diag-raZ of this system and my lagoon with this letter.
I may have made mistakes in the past, but none of these were intended. I will do what is
needed to keep my lagoon managed in the future according to the laws of North Carolina. I ask
of you your cooperation to accomplish this without any penalty or as must relief as possible. The
penalty would only cause extreme financial difficulties for my family.
Your help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
A. C. Daniels
Route 2, Box 417
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
/acd
Enclosure

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID F
FzI
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director C
May 9, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE VESTED
A.C.Daniels
A. C. Daniels Swine Operation
Route 1 Box 417
Castalia NC 27816
Dear Mr. Daniels:
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil
Penalties for Violation(s) of N.C.
General Statute(s) 143-215(e)
Franklin County
File No. DD 96-17
Farm Number: 35-35
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against A.C.Daniels in the amount of
$3,344.05 including $344.05 in investigative costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was
taken under the authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any
continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional
penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (do not include waiver
form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement
action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure
for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the
assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of
your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office
the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
-(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DEM
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
W
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a
written petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
"ITU
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within Lhirty days, as evidenced by a
date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this
matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action
to collect the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for
future violations which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
/C A4
v
16
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc!1FR, `Leigh-Wegional Supervisor w/_attacftents �
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attach nts
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
Mr. A. C. Daniels
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT
15A NCAC 2H .0217
NORTH CAROLINA
File No. DD 96-17
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.)
143-215.6A, I, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the
Division of Environmental Management (DEM), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. A. C. Daniels owns and operates an animal facility
in Franklin County located on SR 1618 0.3 miles West of
its intersection with SR 1619.
B. The facility owned by Mr. A. C. Daniels was deemed
permitted as a nondischarge facility onFebruary 1,3ggA
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
C. On July 13, 1995, DEM staff observed that Mr. A. C.
Daniels' lagoon was discharging through a PVC pipe. The
respective uncontained wastewater and solids were
resulting in a discharge of wastewater to an unnamed
tributary of Big Peachtree Creek, which is Class- C
nutrient sensitive waters of the State within the Tar -
Pamlico River Basin.
D. Mr. A. C. Daniels had no valid permit for the above
described activity.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in
this matter totaled $ 344.05 .

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. A. C. Daniels is a "person" within the meaning of
G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
S. A permit for this animal waste management system is
required in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S.
143-215.1. '
C. The unnamed tributary of Big Peachtree Creek
constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of
G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
D. The above -cited discharge is a violation of the
nondischarge permit.
E. Mr. A. C. Daniels may be assessed civil penalties in
this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which
provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per violation may be
assessed against a person for failing to act in
accordance with the terms, conditions or requirement of
a permit required by G.S. 1437215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Mr. A. C. Daniels pursuant to G.S.
143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-28.
2.1(b)(8).
G. The Director, Division of Environmental Management,
pursuant to delegation provided for by G.S. 143-
215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties
In this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,
I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. A. C. Daniels is hereby assessed a civil
penalty of:
$ Raya- da for discharging waste to the waters of
the State in violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0217.
d
3 a-Ta . r u
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is 30
percent of the maximum penalty authorized
by G.S. 143--215.6A.
$ 344.05 Enforcement costs

$3 3 5! 6 es- _ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount
of the penalty z have considered the factors listed in G.S.143B--
282.1(b), which are:.
(1)' The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources
of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
S- 7
(Date) A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management

October 19,1995
1W Daxmy Smith
Raleigh Regional Office
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Hog operation
SR 1618
Frenkiin County
Dear Mr. Smith:
f 12 3 fqo� i
L=, -
DF.HNR RUEIG '',• r
On January 30, 1995, 1 was employed by the State of North Carolina Department of
Insurance. At that tins, my wife and I decided to close our hog operation, after furrowing all
sows. This was completed on August 1, 1995. Our decision was made not to continue in the
swine business, because of the poor condition of our building and cost of remodeling. Our plans
at that time was to close down the lagoon.
We are planning on taking out the old pipes that flow wastewater to the lagoon from
breading, gestation and farrowing houses to help stop the avenue fiom excessive amounts of
stormwater fiom entering into the lagoon. The six inch PVC pipe that was placed in the lagoon
was removed on October 4, 1995. This pipe was not placed into the lagoon as a "willfully
discharging, pollutants to the waters of the State".
I read about constructing wetlands as a way of wastewater treatment technology. This
design system is where you have a lagoon up fimt, then you feed wastewater into a shallow marsh
where plants like bullrush, duckweed and other plants grow. Thay found that wetlands are
removing a lot more nitrogen per acre than we could put on land straight out It was stated in the
.'` article that just over a quarter of an area would handle 140 hogs.
I dug a small constructed wetland of about two -tenth of an acre to try this system. This
was the reason for the pipe in the beam of the lagoon Whan the water would got to my high
water mark, it would run out the pipe into the constructed wetland. When enough water was in it,
I would pump the lagoon down. This would stop water from entering the wetland. This wetland
system worked and I would have liked to continued it on a larger scale if I had stayed in the feeder
pig business.

jl�v
) ,
-1 t I I v - I I , r ry s �v i , f - 'f i , (- f­
11 f "
. . . .; ft I
11. t I — i
, . j
I . ­� I
fl';' V OfT -,I
I 1 4
1
tY 1p, i jj rj 14 1 '1; j
t— ij r
0., of, 7-
1?,*.' pj'! I I I IP _'n I J UjJJ 1.1.1
ttjt' 1,11114", pillo 111r, 4.
tjA +'U
111 it
ts k.r �;Jk I fp, - L,
i�'r' IW.thpl lij irtr, j"J) j10jC"-i ('j
rjj�-
it
"j1jr'fA13 1 0A lis . '46b AJAIPI.11 LAA TV' IAA IPtiti }Jill dly slit kI 61,111, '.;j 1jr(3 41.) 'lic
- , 1
oil �'J:. '.1
it
"I r, 4i Fjrat li f4j' I -FT W Ili Ira( 1;
. . , I 'j t 'r 0 � 'f ') 11 4
AV'( PAIAP116 J-111611401"o fu j!)" i,b-. 'di f!'
f Fir,
1; v., y
flUJINif 011 1-, M. iirlj }Iiry frjfj bi I sr:v i r r i it tt. i r ii. ti i c' ) fe te; jasf 0 111 1 P
s I, -.0 Aaj
'J9
j p'v,f 'w 0. -j ''t I I I
JW31}I"sjifrf; 14 ftj'*l 11111!% iW. 111iff j17OP19r,91 10 nF(W.' f Ms j 1 0,; rill:, r illmIL (111COAM.*t Ill]
IV 41" 4's", r,i. tot 'r"I)kjF1
I'Llpfir.pil r ttjnj1.j
4 0 1

Mr. Dandy Smith
October 19, 1995
Page Two
My current waste management practices are: (1) to use a irrigation system with a 100
nellson gums, about 1" of water per acre every three hours, oovw five -tenths of an acre of land per
setting; (2) I have 10.5 acres of ooasted bamuda grass to apply wastewater on. This is twice the
amount of land that soil conservation stated that needed; (3) I will be applying wastewater to the
grass when the water level in my lagoon reaches sue foot below high water mark or after every cut
of grass.
I may have made some mistakes in the past, but none of these were intended. I will do
what is needed to keep the system managed in the future according to the law. I ask of you, your
help and cooperation to accomplish this without any civil penalties. This would only cause
extreme financial difficulties for my family.
Sincerely,
a L (?- P-eL-�/
A.C. Daniels

,4pmrl,�]A'
6 'jilf4FV, 111i , 11fl.H.1 Cliff U.i $Jill I'll
­jmo orvw!fmf,q )i; q4t-,
J rfvlpcfff- litll-W .'OpIr !11 pill, LIG11, J%jif JSQJO 0[
vj� )o.v fAY, lif.[1A%'� Ulk'p IT]IT' *jT Jij'�L
� titfif
jjil(i ifr-,'qr(j' t3) T jfl11jj1j'),?)i!� i—,1? A, ffY
r(#—,l­fPT 1) N IM I r
Aj I I'" 41�Af '—. o 1 rf'
")I iA.3101 brk ljCt.# f,jy ! i. ;,jjrr, lit-Pil-' I JIAI. 1, 01p,1 Lot 'ilp it i I'M) 11 .0 r.
i"10 1, ill;A: it !..flj A J.-J, ;,lip 'I J-)jl
CIO,'

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
CERTIFIED MAIL
1S
3f
�EHNR
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
August 11, 1995
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. A. C. Daniels
Route 1, Box 417
Castalia, N 27816
Subject: Notice of Violation
Hog Operation
SR 1618
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Daniels:
On July 13, 1995 Danny Smith of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted an inspection of the subject animal operation. This
inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Smith observed significant problems associated with both
the solids collectors located at the end of your hog containment
buildings and the broken pipes in the rain diversion swales. The
broken or poorly managed solids collectors were resulting in a
discharge of hog waste and the broken pipes provide an avenue for
excessive amounts of stormwater to enter into your wastewater
lagoon. Further, Mr. Smith saw that a 6 inch PVC pipe had been
placed in the berm of the lagoon at your facility. This pipe was
conveying wastewater from the lagoon at approximately 2 gallons per
minute to unnamed tributary of Big Peachtree Creek.
The above mentioned discharges are in violation of North
Carolina General Statue 143-215.1 (a) and the presence of this pipe
is a violation of North Carolina General Statue 143-215 (e) which
respectively states:
143-215.1 (a) "No person shall do any of the following things
or carry out any of the following activities until or unless
such person shall have applied for and received from the
Commission a permit therefor and shall have complied with such
conditions, if any as are prescribed by such permit.
1. Make any outlets into the waters of the State;"
143-215(e) "Except as required by federal law or regulations,
the Commission may not adopt effluent standards or limitations
applicable to animal and poultry feeding operations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, where manmade pipes, ditches,
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

I
Mr. A. C. Daniels
Page -t-
or other conveyances have been constructed for the purpose of
willfully discharging pollutants to the waters of the State,
the Secretary shall have the authority to assess fines and
penalties not to exceed five Thousand dollars ($5000.00) for
the first offenses. The definitions and provisions of 40 code
of Federal Regulations 122.23 (July 1, 1990 edition) shall
apply to this subsection"
This Office is issuing you a Notice of Violation regarding
this matter. You are required to immediately eliminate the illegal
discharge, which is subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000
dollars per day. Also, you must remove the man-made conveyance
(pipe). In order to remove this pipe you will need to pump down
your lagoon (properly land applying this wastewater!) and have the
resources immediately available to repair the compromised lagoon.
You may wish to contact your district soils office for assistance.
In addition, this Office will recommend to the Director that
the subject animal facility lose Deemed Permitted Status which will
require the immediate development of a certified waste management
plan. Also, this office is considering recommending an Enforcement
Action for the man-made conveyance which may result in assessment
of civil penalties.
You must respond in writing to this Notice of Violation no
later than September 8, 1995. You should specifically explain how
you eliminated the discharges, why the pipe is in the lagoon berm,
how long it was in place, and the date you removed it. Also, you
should discuss your current waste management practices (type of
equipment, acreage available to apply wastewater, cover crop,
frequency of waste application).
Please, carefully address each of the aforementioned issues in
your response. Thank you for your assistance with this matter and
if you have any questions please contact Mr. Danny Smith or Ms.
Judy Garrett at [phone].
Sincerely,
2-
'a
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
/ds
H:\acdannov
CC: Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Franklin County Health Department
Mr. Steve Bennett - N.C. Division of Soil and Water
Conservation
John Holley - Land Resources
RRO - File Copy
Central Office - Water Quality

�y OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Eax:919-715-6048 Aug 7 '95 10:17 P.01/02
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
lea# and.;Natu'ral Resources.. + •
Division,of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, GovemorIda
.lonattian B:' Howes;' Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 7, 1995
Post -it- Fax Note 7671
i pages 2
From ff/
`( - Loor
- M .E M 4 R.3 NI)f CJ M: }} Co./Ciept. Co.
i Phone # Rhone n
419
To: Regional Water Quality Supervisors Fax # Fax #
From: Dianne Williams Wilburnw.
Subject:.Information from Regions
m Animal Operations
Please find attached a note from Steve Tedder. He has a meeting with the Governor's Office at
5:00 today- Please provide the following information.and fax -to me by 2:00 today. Please feet free
w y to hid write,,rt�he. infornsatlon.�J //�� f
-Farm Name :�l• �/ � Owner Name: At, �'► � � ` r, r�
Responsible Party (if different -from Owner):
Location: a 3 �(, l
County: �ii`!d �l _ _ _ Fish Kill : Yes or )Circle One)
Type'and Amount of Waste Spilled:
114
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 100/. post -consumer paper

pug 7 '95 10:17 P.02102
Pa
9
WO
Fax [phone] .
RRTIONS BRRNCH
y{�y.. W1bum
- Nate for DiBuine Will�a�r+s
=. Steve Tedder.
A From: S 8:31
Mon, Aug 7 k99
pate-
PILLS.
Subject S
WillWilburn I N M A SHOR r-
iams ,
To: Dianae SPILL SINCE OCEAN TION , T�'pE OF WASTE,
SERA- AII S, TE LOCA LE P,A�RTY TF
'�R HxAAV'E BF -EN CH AS O NO T� ,� SpONSi6
PH Ol�i �
PAMo'UNT SP1L AGKTLL
ENT z , t
KNOWN` THA

JUL-14-1995 1S'2e FPOM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires %amediate _Attenni0r%-'
Facility No. ,�5 3 S
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -13 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: _.
County:
2 VM
Integ:rator: Phone:.
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Add-'css-cr-ation: �Lf 1?1_�,�__
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number. ACE_ ______ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Lad nude: Longitude: Elevation: _ _ Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Anima[ Waste Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or Actual Freeboard: Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or vq' Was any erosion observed? Yes o N
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or to
Cmp(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum. setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings?(I�ear No
100 Feet from Wells? 6�or No
:e animal waste stockpiled within 1.00 Feet of i TSG5 Blue Line Stream? Yes or(!9.
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or ca
' anztr+a] waste discharged into w tess of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
.,,imila- rnan-made tlerlces'? 9e or No If I' ts. Please Explain.
'ti+Jcs tilc raLility rtiai_ntain adequate waste nlanagerneut records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)" Yes oreo
Additional Corrzmenms -- —J — --..L./----- -. --
fTf`)01 6
-n ;
WN
cc: Faciliry Assessment Unit
,e ec�r46ture
bo/ v,
CUSS
ol� IJse AE&Ls if Needed.
TOTAL P.02