350027_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
[DaHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 28, 1997
Mr. Cary Green
Route 2, Box 398-B
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Removal Request
Facility # 35-27
Shearin Farm
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Green:
On July 16, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted an annual inspection to determine compliance with
the State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
The inspection determined that the facility was not operational and
that no discharges ofwastewater were observed to any waters of the
State.
At your request, the Raleigh Regional Office will recommend that
your animal operation be removed from the registration data base.
Please note that if some time in the future you wish to reopen this
facility you will be required to have a General Permit prior to
restocking the facility and meet any current buffer set back
requirements in place at the time of repopulation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions concerning this inspection
please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely�Ja*=
J y Garrett,
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NOF C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50°k recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Date of Inspection
Facility Number .Z.
Time of Inspection j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered.. ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Ce El Permitted rr or Inspection includes travel and processing)
NatOperational Date Last Operated:.... ! Z..y.f............................................................................................................
Farm Name:.`. �1f-4..0�-e ...`S �.n.. .. A ........ County:.... !4'`. ��.._"+.......................y._ .....
Land Owner Name: .�[n... .... � �j.......................................... ................ Phone No:.2( .. s� .......... .Z(�...9.................
Facility Conctact:...........5 .. ! 1.. G........................................ Title:............/....................................... Phone
lNo: .... ...........................J..........................
MailingAddress: ....r�.. Z:...... ......... ...... ...^... ................... -�1`/ � f.................. Y......................... ...... 7. R.l. '�'............
OnsiteRepresentative: � !") ? .°.. .. �. .... ... ..0-"-/............. Integrator:.............. 441'V;4� ...............................................
Certified Operator: .................. ............... .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: 5 V lip /
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4
......................................... .............. .......................................................... .................................... ............................... _............................................ ................................... .
Latitude •6 44 Longitude • 4 «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ldNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

FacilVy Number:.. ........—.Z..7...
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
S ructures-(Ilagoons andlor Holding Pond
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
.......Q..' b.... (.. .......................... .........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes [2'�0'
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes t No
❑ Yes o
Structure 4 Structure 5, Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application,
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type l N..H .?� �.. .... ....,`�L..S}^'.��:....�oA� U
7" r. ................:.......................I.........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Manageln;r ,�lan vW1VIP]�
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? yy((��VV �� / ,P/f
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
2
6 <,e4-, e__ 6
❑ Yes...grNo
❑ Yes Ld'No
❑ Yes No
❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑Yes 0NNoo
❑ Yes td"No
❑ Yes R
❑ Yes
❑ Yes VNElYes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name `I r,!.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r� Date: 7 `"—�� 5�7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 29, 1997
Cary Green
Shearin Farm
Rt 2 Box 398E
Castalia NC 278 L
EHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICJ
Dear Cary Green:
I IL
�EHNR
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 35-27
Franklin County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed,the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does.not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed pernutted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S 10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a li uid waste system
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity A1lirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Cary Green
Shearin Farm
Rt I Box 398B
Castalia NC 27816
INTWA
1DEHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Shearin Farm
Facility ID#: 35-27
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Green:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. reston Howard, Jr., P. ., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, W 4.
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% r0cycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 4, 1995
Mr. Carry Green
Route 1, Box 398B {
Castalia, NC 27816
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Hog Operation
State Road 1617
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Green:
On July 13, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Smith's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
management deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoon has little freeboard, less than 6 inches in some
areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in order
to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breech. Please note
that a properly operating lagoon should have a minimum of 17
inches of freeboard.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issue within
30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address
how you plan to correct this problem and submit a schedule (with
dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycied/ 1096 post -consumer paper

Mr. Green
Page -2-
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
YOU that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For
a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely
ennet Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn2
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Sennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation
John Holley - Land Mangment

RRO P.O2/02
a-1995 15:26 FROM DEH WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
Site Requires Immediate Attention 5
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN-'
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS/STM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: .%` 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Own(
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator:
On Site Representative: —
Physical AddresslLocation:
��11_
Type of Operation: Swine Y_ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: '7_
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ DEM Certification Number. ACNEW
Latitude; 3 6 2-" Longitude:" O Elevation:eet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fTeeboW of 1 Foot 4- 25 year- 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or(o Actual Freeboard: C2 Ft. _ Inches
Was any seepage observed, from the lagoon(s)? Yes ordp.Was any erosion observed? Yes or l9
Is adequate land available for spray?O or No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized: —
Does the facility meet SCS m nisnum setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellings?�Yes�Tr No
100 Feet from. Wells? elor No
!_he animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or&
anjinal waste land applied or s,pmy irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Liner Yes or(9
an waste discharged into waters of the state by jean -made ditch, flushing s_ystetra, or other
:;iTnila.r man-made devices? Yes orA if Y-s, .Please Expla.iu,
'JI �cg ltic tactility rriaintain adequate was a managernerit records (volumes of manure, land applied,
splay irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.O2

ze cP Asa
i • no !0 3 6 124a i Cadl � � 1 I L'1
%1�39 1x.F Ixa] .r, L laJ7 ` 13Z J .w
RmkyFa d aCreek ; I.�FA3 �p.3
n a
�13:9 tiP G 1+1s ry 7dL > a f43 L1
l l 34
I L-1 1346 L443 ]F� 1! _ Ems+, UU !F} a Lin fii; h
dye} i LM-21-1 ivy 1jxZ ....Y i
Z ti- 1.6 a ILA .a :1 FAS rT.
1244 ._.
_ FAS �2 � l�M1 1'ai I131 ar + Pi
Ma,lltan r•9 3 -
a Iz46 ,1 3e } ~ Ingleside '', 1. Hu 113] ,'?,� \y ]+31 \ 9 F� ,b liil
TAS Q c
1 Ix1a ' �? 1]x7 34 ,$J tT- !p a �.. I 1 .5 n
101 J
12i J.4� b7:1 ' s i.3
\ Ila! ? 171e / II]I '+.. 31 '�t�, 1437 I 1
L V 11 1 3e 1 7 L42Z 7r '2 0 J�
e 1 ,fit• i / n a 1421 Um
LM
TAR ]443 xas LM2 Oy61 .3 e
t n p 1137 FN` +� Y 'Y \ A 4 ` �Y L462
'�� } Fj5 r•�4,. �' '\ White level 14 .9
J 221 `5 Jg9,L +PjL �0 �i ~ 761 1 9 i4Q.a- ➢ it4 a .7 .3 .3
1
1x�3 1.s F? r�3 1x�s m I
1211 Mildlinar! 1234 f LOUIS8i1R1
G� Jill - } 81 Rock � 2i !a y L
Crouraads i .6 {Yl� �FOF. 2,94 I S Ia31 u +]1
'a FAS '/ in '
!y F� y ]11 131P t f l
miTCNINER S '° 'a 4.0 1421 9 ,r l ,e\ _ 1!]i. 1
I+1
1323 ISii .p POND ys n 1bo 1.3
7. ... t - b .a la T II 9
rro� t ;• `P / tat] 1yQi `l afa /
1.6 '<"} Z 14iiSlir"d�lg L311
.6 '1 u' Slolingr
9221 I 1211 FAS \� i J�GZ
Cra3lraad]
-- n '' d Um L!il L [� TI70 'o- LM .3
' 1.. .7:.: 3 ±� PAS.3 A i '/ A I.o OAS +.°
j� 1x�1 FrankPul Field� +t. ,� � ''`'t ' :+ SE ? PAS
Kalesrilla ! << � 12A.1
L1An
1.i ti. '!.� TAR ,y /If/_1 ro, - ,X;
F 111 .6 M16 L l+ f
9/01 1 1Q �aa;l '• FAS \�lACXSON'S ! ? 4
Maplevill. POND �•' �7 � �
v 'a
C 1L4 � 173 09 `? VLML 381 10F' _ -
\� 114 eek A .y ll10 Br, Im 11 w 14Ji,
J as M1
k, y 1A 1110 14� 1 u S.1 r,S )) q
7 Cr, i l.0 14Q1 U 11 ! 109 4 f I
y 1146 160E ) / ` .
'• 110E Run (i5. i 1f/\ - '1711
au
rA
fJ3 ,�1 }_yas .2.4 �' J �h 16i3 f a 61 le]9 p •..
1. 1AL,
JJ11 yf �r . rao ��F Marpo•et `I
i y LM FJm3
�s n -P Y
J3a \ /
�� .� 1703 Creek ' 162, /
1.2 .a •e ° AO U b } - 1.2 1627 e -° T \ ��
I lox tN 1L4.d ! 1.2
S
Roy°I Ifo J ,lpc� 1? ~ 1? t� a 1631
119.3 r �i4 fo3 16°e y ti' j a I � V
'+9 Big 17oa L ',t! `f%' 10AL i8 A
FA 429 a sat 10
M1 7 6 ! 179E 7FAS y a 1&10 3d.11,
<
LM7 Crooked 17s3 Iax6 FAS 7 Seven\ 1 It _
331
. CLIFTON P°rM
POND
FAS Nam] 110x l7av 9.0 °.s 4 a
r Gra3xroadr \} •° 1347 T'IR LaJ..l
t} ]J P C 10 ris T' ts�4. �� IffiI
l
FAS .S Phelps"' "..1 !o 1707 LM t� r 39 P 6 BIJ N FAS11
1.3 Chp. x ¢ '-` POE. 284 1= /4>;
J.P3.t`l J!4? .1
1� kY Hop.
° 1 10 9a FAs !O 1 •: ?;, 19� FAS 1�i Jen o I
m e to +s 1 u �_ ....,.,/���//F�•/,//3 7 1.
1711 i+ \.��`a???,,,- 1.° FAS 4.Y �•° ZI' �° / / 1
I FAS 9 a Y `ter. tea' L
17
RIVER !'J
:=. Jets 1720 f /7 r`L 111a l9 L 1�19 e I
I730 .C'„ 'tiS ; 161E
L. [l 11 .
1770 ( �? !a ♦ Fes
r� .1 L31 PERRY'S- \.
POND
1, •�•�y'• 1 L l 12zx �` w r^Is !d ~171 ' 13x
9 v 173e 17j� 39 G
Ritey ti -100.1
A
17s�� .4 .2 '� l'O , IfiT 1 �! �'tM]' �^
i 1 rZI
VA
33°33' 1 1" lax .a 173 P } '6 7, 1764 35•3 '?A
T 1772, } S t.3 Pie Rid .) TO P]ASTWaAa
b i.7 Paorcex 1 a i Ridge
.0 �.. y 64
3. ills 1J , •, 1 1710r1 .3...J
+ 14 ' , 3 `
1776 \L_J 1102
-
Fh . 1

...- .......,:.. K- ..�.�9'_ _ .. -- ..,/• . .:`u+5r U"'{1P V'P"�ti•sij.:Nfn 'ti.1� `U�. ���y� � '.. ...�.* .�.
Date of Inspection/(
Facility Number �
�-�-7�;;� �
Time of Inspection h_!1_CJ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status• ❑Registered ❑Applied for Permit
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:I.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ C d [I Permitted
1 or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
f
,�•"" of Operational- -•"Date Last Operated:......
.... ` z/...... f?.......................................................................................................
Farm Name: : ::Y._.P� `^ ..�.1'!7 1 1 / (` k— s....... ?. `'.:........... County:..1 !x!at.. r.1.!.`!...............................................
q c
Land Owner Name: .rill ! I
•..... Phone No: �............. ........ .,............................................................. .......................
FacilityConctact• '�'�^ '• �' ...._.... .............................y....
.....................
Title:............................................... Phone Na:..........................................................
..
f
Mailing•Address: ..... .........:..:....... �. .. ...��.�..
... .......................
,.
Onsite Representative:' ..Y.+ .. s'S , G 1 !!'' Y '..
.................. Intfgrator: L.._:..:.... ._.............................................................
Certified Operator:...... ....... ..—
kOperator Certification Number...........` .............
Location of Farris:
—, 3. I ; t
Latitude Longitude • ���•
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ,
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system jo'ther than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/34/97 s, '= maintenance/improvement?
,,❑ Yes I1N
❑Yes No
r"" • ❑ Yes
f
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes VN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Continued on back

F&-ir N;umber:.•.- �...
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes L546
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes' 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes #J o
8—tructures f1jagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
v'
............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ .............. ............. ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? U4,cs ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes VNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1S. Crop type' .'�Y:.-A........... :.r...�n )� ...e._
_ / r'................-........... ........................... ............................ ..........................--- •..............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes I..SNo'
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes l-d"No,
r'y 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No'
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No. .
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? El Yes No
For Cer0fied Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
,Continents (refer to`questuon #) Explain any YESanswers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use`drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) w
N
4�.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: ­7 —,/Wo • Y
ce: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility,f ssessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility Number
Date of Inspection
�.
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fhours
Farm Status: ❑Registered El Applied for Permit ��_. (ex:1.25 for 1 hr IS minin)))) Sp Spenn t on Review ad
❑ Cerjified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
of Operational Date Last Operated:.....�.j ... l.t ...4.9................................................. _....................................................
Farm Name: CZL..:ez:.. .:...................................................C..I...l...Z.....v....i..._............. County:..... ...... .. .......
Land Owner Name:......`?..i � � /
.......c..y .............. .............................................. Phone No:..O �
........._......................._................................................
FacilityConctact:.............. .. -4!! ..................................... Title:................................................ Phone No:..........................................................
22 /
Mailing Address:..... ...... 2.......8... ...k..............1. ).-R .... h?..................CY/ S /I (r'9 1
........................................................................._� .7 .....'............
Onsite Representative: ,{,Lf„^,?'S�; (1>1 lam• '}' /� "! `L Integrator: :.......................
............................................................................................................_............................ _.........
.
Certified Operator: .................. A.4 ............... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................,
Location of Farm: `J C /,p /
Latitude =*=' = ` Longitude =• =` =u
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ❑"N00
❑ Yes Isi No
❑ Yes N /
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes `
❑ Yes N /
❑ Yes N '.
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

. ♦*1 ..� y, ..^w.. . "^7�'.. n.vr'S..nar ..,.,.;:-.y�.r, -'ir.. ',�—� ._,.,w. , :s.. - Vie ..�.:, '1?".:Ll, �a�... rw��'w'.;Y+'i pi. ,. r1r, �. ram• �.%.f.Cr''�'i.. _:.,y�✓.ri�,"�S+e�F'_, t�'.'�'h•ef
Facility Number: ....�`'-,,...... ....Z
...........
6. Is"facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes O-No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ko
Struclurcs (Laguans and/or Holding Poll"
9. Is storage capacity freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes M, 0
g P tY ( P g) q .4
Freeboard (fi): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
....d ...... ............................ ............................ ......... I.................. ............... I............ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes a5o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;N'-o
o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Yes ❑ No
Waste Agplicatign
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ONo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
f
15. Crop type...:.......:...............:.�.... .......................�
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Mana e et}Y�lan (AWMPY?_.. ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? f/ ❑ Yes ❑'No �F
i
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes O'No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes © N
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? El N /
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? _. ❑ Yes No
Fold#led Facilities Qnly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to questidn #) Explam'any YES answers and/or any recommendations'orany other coinments.'- -- - - Use drawings of facility to�better expiain s�tuatwns '(use adci�tional pages as necessary}X F`
...
r Q rr- v ra w✓ r=;<.- 4;;1,,,_ J11- jInr
Reviewer/Inspector Name
`• Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �-
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
4/30/97