330067_PERMIT FILE_20171231

lReason
Type of Visit: p Com ' nce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance for Visit: Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: -/ Arrival Time: Departure Time: I ng4county: Region:
12— / (}
Farm Name: % / Gj r Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Z Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Certification Number:
Sack -up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle jJ
C*apacity
Pp.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
s
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P,oultrF
Ca acit
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gifts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other I
10ther
Discharges and Stream_ Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes Z<O ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

lFactlity Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
EYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Z,,,q.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system'other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ -PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1y �
,,4 : n
13. Soil Type(s): '
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ YesVNA
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] Yes
❑ NE
acres determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
rN ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? lfyes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 1-1
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

lFaellity Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes LG '� ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes Na ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes V<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[—]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (referto question.#):Explain any YES; answers and/or any additional,recommendations,or any.other'comments.
Use drawings�of facility..to.betterfex lain situations (use additional pages as,necessary). g
CI�bY����-.
tv
0 7 5 o -ZS
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Phone:
.3�, s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C .C� G'� �/ Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Date of Visit: -- 2- Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: (�jt-Qk oy- s/ r19S rtrq _ Owner Email:
or
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
�4
Design
Current
Current
Design Current
Swine
@apcit,
Pop.,
Wet -Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pnp
uiurs
r�mia,n�nn���
4� ��
,irauru,�ur�s
ai9r.
91
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
W n to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D .: IPqult
Ca acil. ,
I'o .:
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
'
Other
Turke Poults
Other
I
c
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (Ifyes, notify DWR) ❑ YesVF
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21417015 Continued

I i
lFacility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONoo
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? Ifyes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments refer to ueshon° # Ex liitn an "YES answer"'and/or an , additeonal, recommendations or a'ny other comments
„ ( ,9 )„E R, ,€ a, , Y € I ,l,:a:, I, Y !:.
t., c.. E�- !?.-.h�'L� [ �.�s.l -! t.... I. lid fl:ggtiii.l43... - ! �. . pis ii! . i- -..g !1 { �..' '.° ,' 3i . !.t i
Use drawings,,of,,facil. atobetter„expes1.11s9necessary)jji;l!!I V�c11,IrI,I�LEiI;l:ii�illl,lt e'!4i1;l�li°VI:I iiii�,z�,€,h.Is�1o:l.il.E;,li.Esr�V':�:q
`7l hal5P 5,WrVe
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: -W -y zoo
Reviewer/inspector Signature:rit.'� %� _�Ot,�'Q [i _ Date: 4/r 2 — 09
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection: 2�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): � 2. f c�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes _ No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ YesVNo�_'o
NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): f3er#1stG'4r-P
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops dit%r from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesV
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
_]NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
19. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
0 NE
Required Records & Documents
�No
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes V5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
ludge Survey
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall InspectiVNo
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ YesVr�NA
❑NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Type of Visit: V CoroutiInle
ee Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �j%% Arrival Time: Departure Time: [� County:
r
Farm Name: f --sl /.firg2E&tL- n-­ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: l er4ai Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design C►arrant
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
DrPoulacityYVIAME
Layers
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Otherj
I
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No [DNA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesVNoE]
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑YesNA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Wacilii7y Number: IDate of Inspection: r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ��
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (30—. r"MAi
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E [] NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
V0 NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�rN o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and V Rainfall Inspectio;No
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

'Facili Number: L4 Date of Inspection: 7 rl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ;;Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #E)t Explain any YES answers and/or any additional' recommendationsor.any other c6inments :
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
� r3
b - Zjr
t/ l�S�� ! t r 1 /� L� L SLG /✓r l+a QsI�^ ` V �V D
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 7q 1, L� 7_c;>0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G� S Cam,/ _ t��� _ Date: 3- '7 —/ 6
Page 3 of 3 21412014

(Type of Visit: CVICom ace Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: gRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: L 3�j County:
Farm Name: �?jQ_ -r— ��t7_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _& a:::& tz
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pvp.
WetsPoultry
iacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P�o.ultr.
,Ca aci
P,o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes FNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: S2
p - 62 1 Date of Inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes <No
NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z rj t l
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No -❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � ,,-I 1.1
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VN9,1 ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres detennination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
10 ❑ NA
[] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
&N(o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design []Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes (1�w❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes�VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: I Date of ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IC.I 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments,(refer to question #): Explain any YES=answers•and/or any additional•'recommendatrons or any other comments . �
Use drawin ' of facili to better explain situations use additional pages as necessary). a j
g _ t1_ p ( P- g_t��s� £s
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit: aCom ' ce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance J
Reason for Visit: er Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access 'I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ("p, eparture Time: County:
Farm Name:C�.e✓7� r�S �jla►�C, Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
I
11
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
ILayer I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dai Calf
INon-Layer
I
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr, P.oultr. Ca acr P,o P.
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
I I Beef Stocker
Gilts
I 113cef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
LTurke
Turke s
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [] Yes o NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE.
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Z111-
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes N A
tA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑Yes No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift [] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _;3�rn-�rz Cam, fzy �✓
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZIN ❑ NA
❑ NE
l5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Zy
VI No NA
❑ NE
M. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No NA
[] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA'
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
E] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate boxes) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments'(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
4
Use, drawirigs;of facility to better explain 'situations (use additional pales as necessary). , ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

2 ,,-0_ c-(
Type of Visit: 40 Com ce Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: LN4J Arrival Time: [) Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:13 p,�r �S u r S� Owner Email:
—--
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phonee,:,
Onsite Representative: - (3 ✓ e"e,r... _ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design Current Design Current
Wet,1?oultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er Daia Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, Poultr. Ca acit P.o Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers I I 113eef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
I 113eef Feeder
Soars
Pullets
I 113eef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Wh t • th t'mated of me that reached waters of the State ( altons)?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. a is a es i v u g
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes rNo
[3 NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA [3 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued --

Facifi Number: 1 Date of Inspection: ,�
t
Waste Collection & Treatment
<No❑
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Z. I NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
]Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z- ( t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes aN ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
t0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc,)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Totat Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift []Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 3a r 5- _
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
g No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
16 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑ Design [:)Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2TNo ❑ NA ❑'NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers [] Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili NuMber: - Date of Inspection: t
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes K ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor. or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain:any YES:answers and/or,any additional°,recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as, necessary):
C'p° &. ti ki .10_. 0-1 5- - 3 a--13
Ate, S(kJ5eSu ✓e-,,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: I y
21412011

y / S-
3
Type of Visit: U Compliance Inspection V Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: %�Z��Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: �(
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
sign Current Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Pop. Cattle Capacity
Wet Pnff
Pop.
1.city
Wean to Finish
La er DairyCow
Non -La er DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P■oultr, Ca acit P,o , Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers Beef Stocker
Non -Layers Beef Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Ef VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes o -NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ONE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): &rA7 y
13. Soil Type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;2rNo NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes;NooNA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
eo[o]
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�N0NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I ° Rainfall Inspections fudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ID Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili • Number: 31 - k2 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes jVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(cs) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[] Yes ❑ No [] NA [] NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any..addihonal recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to.better. explain' situations (use additional, ages as necessary) _:.
�.
1-00 -~ r2_ rr zr
A,r
t
Z 2 11 �-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: j �� VZO t)
Date: yz�l� ^_
21412011

,3(Zz(tz.
(Type of Visit: rQ Co
ance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
sit:
Reason for Vi0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IZ Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
l Certified Operator: ( . 6
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
Non-L,
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Pe
Gilts
Boars
Latitude:
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Region:
❑ Yes K] No ,❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes y
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g No, [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑YesrNoONA
NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Dumber: jDate of inspection: 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): Z
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
L .w
❑ NE
❑ NE
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes t5No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
ZNo
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? ff yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑+ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r 2 f �-L, (� Q t ^^ k
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[3 NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes❑
VN9o,_
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes LJ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes Nc
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes EjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design []Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE _ r
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers "'❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and V Rainfall Inspection/❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes PZ No [DNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? []Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [E]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA C] NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No (DNA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the ReviewertInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [:]Yes ❑ No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations;or-any other comments + . � ,;,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). F,r ` k.s #�
Sr h t� sG+ ,ry e {7 �.- �ij Dec-,
4�pr✓on 1-f�g �vi-ses
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/]nspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: -7 C% - 4l Zp d
IS &t..s Date: ' Z I ! �-
2/4/2011

6f 1&t I
Type of Visit Cli
ompRoutine
Inspection
Operation Review Structure Evaluation
Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival //�� Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: =5��1 Z !� Owner Email:
Owner Dame: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: l (3W" .g=--
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Region:
Latitude: = c 0 ` Longitude: = ° =,
= 1
1
Design C*urrent
Design Current Design Current
Swine C+apacity Population
Wet Poultry
c@. UYA Population Cattle C*apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Layer
I ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Vkan to Feeder
10 Non -La er
1 ❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑Non -La ers Pullets
❑
❑ Turke s
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
El Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
ID Other
I ures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
YesVNoEINA
❑
esEl
esEl12128104Continued
Y
Y
El NE
❑ NE
❑ NE

Facility Number:_3
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier;
❑ Yes , No NA. ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notif DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;No
o A El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ai mlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
i ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > t0% or t0 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) &/tom.
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Commentst(refer to `question #) Explain any YESansivers and/or any recommendationsgor any other comments
Use drawings.of facility to; etter explain situationsijuse additional pages as necessar : ;,
J0. K
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name,, ,� '# Phone: Z4
�� is . a� C.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: !;12_4t 1U
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 5� Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'? '❑ YesZNo;NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ N ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections Bather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�N El NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El
NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El
NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit`?
ElYesNA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
J
Additional Coinrnenfs and/or Drawings:
tort I#
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Foci ' umber Date of Visit: . ] G . ime:
rO Not Operational Below Threshold
ar-eIr"rn,itted 0 Certified - 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: / J County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 4 44 Longitude 0 4 46
Discharges 8. f 5trearn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes,
Structure 6
-identifier:
Freeboard (inches): D
05103101 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
t
❑ Yes L- No
seepage, a c.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
/
closure plan?
❑ Yes
[ &0 /
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
,• /.
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No'
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ETNo /
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No ,
/
Waste Application
r`
`
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
Q No ,
12. Crop type�.�
B. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
E.No r'
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? f '
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No•'
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
.O No ,
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[lo
Reauired
Records & Documents/
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Cl Yes
No,
_No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
`
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Q No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
P'No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
El Yes
/
�I'Qo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
d No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to;questions#) Explain any�YES answers a.nd/or any recommendations or any other comments.
f +h -
Use drawings of facility'to better explainsrtuations ;(use additional pages as necessary): El Field Copy [Xinal Notes
w
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name - � S
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date: � .� ,� ?`• .
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Pj —tI2Date of Inspection j p
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Cl Yes Ca o
❑ Yes o�
❑ Yes r1<0
❑ YesZN
El Yes
El o
El Yes No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: 9, .�?;,,
05103101
05103101

7:
ivision of Water Quality�a�
Ti r
FactLty�Number Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q O.ther:Agegcy
Type of Visit Co lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Vis' 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ZZY
10,4Arrival Time: Departure Time: �] County:
Farm Name: _�Q_r . 61� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative::
Certified Operator: &42f e�,r-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: c = ' = Longitude:
Design Current Design `rEU
IliCapacity Population,,,,''., 4WetPoultry Capacity Popu
Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
)kzfn to Feeder I 1 10 Non -Layer I I �}
Feeder to Finishill
Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars I
ier'
Other
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Region:
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
a� I
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes WN
❑ NA El NE
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N / ❑ NA ❑ NE
[3Yes 5 ❑ NA .❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued I:
tti

Facility Number' —40 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in); (
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes:N�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ZNo NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment;No!
r , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes ZNo[01
NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes:No
No NA [I NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Neavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) I�V r M �ot-f} �/ e-
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El o NA El
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? El YesPNo[:]
NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElNA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
Commentstio , (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendans orrany Ether comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.'(use additional pages as necessary).: . "
z ,
x
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name I
I Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Z
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No -� NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
q❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional.Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number
016ivision of Water Quality i T' o l
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 6 Com nce Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
T
I??I 1
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
( �] r
PeW—kL ­
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: _ � 02 r a g=±z Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:.
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = e 0 d = i1 Longitude: = ° 0 i =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ 1Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heife;
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: 711
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ZNEINA ONE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: j — (� Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes N ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes No []NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 11 a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) �
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental !re , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;/No El NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ��1:5T"t ✓�� / n.-w C4 4,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ..❑ N NA [INE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]YesFNo
'NA El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/inspector Name ,(�j Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

it
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents r
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rain Inspection�N�VoEl:
ather Code
22. Did the facilityfail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
g g
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ld Ng,,-[] NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
N
[INA
ElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?❑
Yes❑
;N�u
NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N❑ NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

6plaviol
Facility Number
jdDivision of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Com ce Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other [:1 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 110 11 D Y I Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 13 ,,,, CAe.*"` _-o-L— Z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
I❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Gilts
Boars
' Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator• fi'1
�S
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =] c =]' = Longitude: 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
4 ❑Non -La el
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers—_
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity. Population.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream ImEacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
El Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA [I NE
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

1
Facility Number: 33
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structured Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: &I Mom+" S e-C .
❑ Yes Vo
NA El NE
❑ YesNA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �r <<
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta;N�ot�
otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit`? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12.
Crop type(s) I3k ,AL-,� -r"J rH c
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZfN NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: $ 7Ft✓e— Date: & ( tii O
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3— G Date of Inspection a
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WDp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes -NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Otber Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYes ;00
NA ❑ NE
ElYes o 110 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
"`«:e.;a,:.:=zz a..ym: w .K#-«i=r s.i€4+.St#k.
��.�s6S�P�s4; �a a; �a� -n�k. a�::az,a � t� [ c�'h.'aw �4 sir. ��. xF� aa.'�x.�v�.
Additional s� Comments and/or Drawin s•��• B �� 3 5*,4 k'
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

11
Type of Visit Com ce #nspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 9f a y Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: e/4 a, '� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: Is Jr
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = c = Longitude: = ° = ' =
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Popu� lation
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population
Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Pouitry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
El Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharves & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes 0 �No[01 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dN:: NA [I NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Vo
NA ElNE
ElYes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No - NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o Cl NA [INE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): t ��
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No A ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa tify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �N0A ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4a "0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) r h &J-A f Y&\ q r 4
G
13. Soil type(s) j
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ON -NA
ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
[I NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
��o
IJ N NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
.X4 '+L ?6's1 P'�� .Y.A 3F i;f �.LXt YEI �11.1.i ``R'°I fX&}$" .4' `3'u 4.-. x1� i .`PAM .� � ' 1.
Comm ntsd(refer-ro questionA) plan ny DES%answers.And/or�auy rec mmend tons or any other comments.
s��ldr'awi gsty�afcfaciity�to,better�explain sitt-t tion's:t(use additional pages�asrnecessary,):
w
•
ReviewerAnspector Name —� Phone: 79/- V 2 8-0
Reviewer/inspector Signature: G Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ Al TT ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No E -NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2). Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ;No
o NA El
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes iU N�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L1IpNo[]--]
NA [I NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

0 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Fo
llow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
-III �I 11111 I�1�11�
Facil' Number Date of Inspection Wd
Time of Inspection24 hr. (hh:mm)
ermitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName. ��`�6.-f../d 5.................................................................................... County:..L��� ..?w{j.... .....................................
Owner Name-
..................... . r�&sca�F......................................................... Phone Not.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...: T .... (1/..Pr.Lrr..�............ ...Title. Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: S I Z 7 wg � ��
.............................L(.... s................ f.....................................................�`.......................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:../......7"...... �3r Integrator: rr............................................................................
J.
Certified Operator:........ h•......'l.. r�!!lr�r......... :.............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude U•
Design Current,'
Desiig`n Current `,
Destgn Current
Swine C l t `'1 '' `1''a '
„
Poultry Ca acity. Po ulation Cattle ,.,Ca ;aci , 'Po ulat�on ,
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Da iry
❑ Other
,
Tofai Designs Capacity
Total LW
Nu'�tibero'Y.ago4ns
_ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Hold�ng:PondsJ 5ohd Traps .
a aci � o u a eon
❑ Wean to Feeder
ceder to Finish
L
❑ Farrow [o Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale'? (If yes, notify nwnl
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 \\S
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............... 7 ..............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, sever(
seepage, et
3/23/99
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N

Facility Number: Daty of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental thereat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? []Yes 0<
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �'lVo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, -gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ��.,�
elevation markings? ❑ Yes LG 0
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
i. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes � 0
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with dose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ❑' �<o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes rVNc)
This facility is pended for.a wettable acre determination?
ElYes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
Required
Records ck Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
20.
Is facility not in compliance, with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21/Revier/Inspector
cility fail to actively certified operator in charge?
❑Yes
No
22tify
regi al DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
rge eeboard problems, over application)
❑ YesEj
Zo
23er/inspector
fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
24lity
require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ YesFNo
25
additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑Yes
: i4 viQl:n�iQtis pe. ftftciend were ii0.ea. O(Wing #his:visit' . Y64 will- ecd*4e iio futther.
COrrQSA0i1CiQQCC. �UiUt t}T1S V1 Ii ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3/23/r}9

Facility Number: — 6 Bate of Inspection
Odor Issues
eo26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes �2
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes its No �+
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes
34. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? ❑Yes o
P66Slvll
3/23199

��- ,. ,.�
. ... _ � ._ �.«1:«i'..�,K�.-s-.ew.�:a,sa �.sf.,�..,.::i'xb..� .';;.��.$vL'iF�.�450�*: �. � �. ..fir:.e.r ,a�,,��:�:. _.^:�. , ,..raw.. .s.:-��6,,,,. . .. ..� tiF,. .. _,.... .s"xl _.�k'. ?.-.., ,.. .. _.. .. �:.i., �., ..�. r,nr.;,

.. € �w P 4�i ° 'f. 1 j i IlNi'l•.,
VW011 fi}Water
7i { ku
' k
�j 1 4'€t_. 3A NA..Ii
•
S I.4i nd: Water Conservation r�
t
ufkf�,�f 5 f
^
Y{+�i 1
7
*
I j! €
t' UWer Agency r€'r
0
i ' er
1
!�
yk S4;.E ti
''"
,
+A.1
a .
! e
tf'kt
_Y, t—.J�;f ..'a>a"*ly
Type of Visit
e Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
C=outine
Reason for Visit
O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
❑ Denied Access
Faci ' umber Uate of Visit: Time:
0 Nat Operational Q Below Threshold
ermitted [] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Y' ........... !"� .................. ..........
t�e.....r?1...2�........ Count d
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:.,
Onsite Representative: ............ .............................................................................................. Integrator:..`'! �r.P.... i. ti::......� Z~5...............
Certified Operator: ,,,,,,�•••• j�J!.-��✓.••--•••-„••-,,,,,,, •- Operator Certification Number: „•„
Location of Farm:
a
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �� ��� Longitude
Design
' � Swine :.Ca >i<cit 1
❑ Wea� Feeder
` eder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
' Nttiiii<tber of Lagoons
Halaing Ponds% solialTraps l
t : • � Design CurrenEi , ' '' t
D+e
in Poultry.''. Capacity .population Cattle Ca
—1 r"I r r 1 7-7.7,
�❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Tota1:Design. Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ Subsurface Drains
❑ No Liquid Waste 11
Area J❑ Spray Field Area
Discharees &Stream Impacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure lStruvre 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ....... I...� ... 1
❑ Yes Imo
❑ Yes 0_
_90
0
❑ Yes ®'No
❑ Yes 4MEt154 o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Structure 6 '
Freeboard (inches): ,
5i00 Continued on Lack

Facilrty Number: 3 _ Date of .Inspection Printed on: 1 /9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0<0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do an of the structures need maintenance/improvement? rovement? ❑ Yes�No
Y P
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes o
12. Crop typed M d1 ri4 5. 13
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility rpqiffire a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were
y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�1Q•Yi¢I;at�i�ijs:o� dgf c{e�s •rv�re �Qte�• cl>�xLi>}g •t��s:v�spt; � :Y:o� �vii�•l�ee�iye �o fN�t��r
6irespo deike: ab6iif this visit: :.....:::::....::.....::.... ..... .
❑ Yes 0,90
❑ Yes �fo�
❑ Yes IdNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 1;1�_
El Yes ;�
❑ Yes 4� N o
❑ Yes fo
"Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o

r
iFacil� Number: —G Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
0
es ❑ No
❑ Yes to
Cl Yes CJ 0
❑ Yes 2-9
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
5100
J

o , . e
Type of Visit 0 m rice Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Co
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Number Date of Visit: z Time: r
ility
18 Not Operational 0 Belo* Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: s4at, I� t114 County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone No:
Title Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �_�0 ` " Longitude ' 4 4.
Design
Current Design Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
11 JEI Layer 921airy
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
...........
❑ Other
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity ."
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
, Number nf.Lagonps bps f ,
i ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Sprax Field Area
Hbldmg=Ponds,lSohdTr."aps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Strearn Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (lf ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structur 1 Structure Structure 3 Stnieture 4 Structure 5
Identifier: D) 1`1 to
❑ YesjNo
No
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes
❑ Yes❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑
❑ Yes o
Structure
Freeboard (inches): it Z It
05103101 Continued

I i 7
t i
..:Y .�. .if.�c1'5'i��tS'�. S�f1"u-+j,�'•b'�'��� �'.fi".�'`diEE'.y��.� �. `t�...eHl�'i"`C .O �I �a,� i-'T?.� °� ....�'.'Q.� t�..'t... a... Y �. _. 6. 'h.•.'.. '1 ��.

$ a
Facility Number: 33 — Date of Inspection d3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ZNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type lr hn i i+ j L
13. Do the receiving crops differ with thos designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes eNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑/N0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes
Required Records &- Doc uments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) es ❑
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ElYes NC
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes LI N
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Cl Yes No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
A`tir }ti.U::.'J.Yn J"ki Nj .',...... ._., :�, .-. _ _ _. ,.
Ca'"mments (r er to:question #) Eaplainn�any YtES�� nswers and/or any recommen atlons'or any other coamments.
;,
II se drawiings offac.�lity to betterrexplain situations: (usetaddit�aniilpages as necessary) Field Copy Final Notes
w
�%/,c�.h�zr►� � f�1c-�- ` � �' � �� �' ti "�'�- is �1 - Z - ��j- ' � -7 - D S " /s /�
�.1s
Vi(_'q u`�S
Reviewer/Inspector Name }; ` ' �; " , ';U'_6 i �;
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: Z
05103101 Continued

I
,
.. - - ... wAi �..wi.�._r. .__"�.��:d'•C.'.'s74��[.e•..l", .}ie�'}lf:: �.,, ii.�.�i•�i x.. •�e, ,h�_wk'�_•�(c} i•r_'._ ...`r. xT?_.+;�:•'.i"'ii- .�__. ..�• -` F - - -.i �..

of Visit Q4ompliar)ce"Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit QRoutine O Complaint p Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
30clifty Number Date of Visit:
�ez. tted ©Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
bFarm Name: ....... .C.isr..SG gf..../ ... ......................
Owner Name:. ..................................................
Mailing Address:
`9 /Q f Time. 0
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..
County:..............................................................
)Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �rQ n^ • s��
Certified Operator: .......'................................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 't Longitude • 4 «
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
cture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier-
. ..... �.............................................................................................................................. .............................
t, i
Freeboard (inches): U_
12112103
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
4
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes X1 No
Structure b
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, []Yes . No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes o
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes:No
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level El Yes
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Excessive Poonndjing ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type 2D A-1 - J0, �1^ Di!mil -,y
13. Do the receiving crops differ with thoke designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes 0,90
❑ Yes Jtva
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El [IN
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ja o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ar,,t:�ra„t, ",i`-=rEr€rtescrs»alt:x�€:s.�P,@„ r }? ihrt,.iSt...:6.; .ta .€>:�P ; <xta€}x:; avu^�t,• � t:t a€t�r,�rr=
1 ,'5Fa'. ryy
Comuaaients'. refearPta uestinn #):1 X ainlIan YES answers;and/or a recommendations':oriaay'othii,i6mments i
- pp t reEE }� ( C r yr3 F3 373"�E6 iE f3�}�
�Y£i} z!d i(EEi€
�
MtyC . @ _y1 3
eEE.:R{ :d:,�irai...i€Jk36 i:iu9E� .,...k,:bdr I.::..Wi .RfAlhb«N��i&d•....86A6,�.�� 3 } I E I,t ,
! E € `�;. � ,it &6.° P IE.3f'�zj a E it a�, < i I
%ise dr wt gs ofEfaciiity'to,better�a0Iatn °sitbiit s: f use addiiaoaai pages'as necessacy)a q"3 a ❑Field Copy al Notes u € ,,s ;} s
§I ' � 2 �°3;r 3 � uy (iE}}{'{[ Epp.€,E , ,rf3 ry. , w 1m€:qF}
::€ �{ ' t3. : R:..,; i3 tl 1� € , S.0 �x °5' �.
�i61•9e�°BEFAET}§:'.�ci��i,il. �3i�"
�',§�::. i:..,fEa,:fi�1iES IFtEP; EFdxf 335..- ���r:ll_� �E ..," .Ee..1.:3 � =a.,. �... E. i.i} 6!��iN�i�,'.'�e,11 te.�'.'.:B�d€€E�[€k4'�EPa,�E.. rt �'tE'.{iN•h
ti1.� .. .; P
�, 'rpm `> 1 ¢i �� i�[ I ' Ggit �t ` �^[ r li��"€1 �S 1?'� �. t 'fi4, tY!
Reviewer/Inspector Name ea r 1. E'�5jj^�(t
E"'EIES
q
.€#FS-:...w9 mod-!.
Reviewer/Impector Signature: Date: �/ 07�
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: �3 — ? Date of Inspection
ReQuired Records & Documents
21'. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
. (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES'Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes roz
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
ElYes o
❑ Yes
N o
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crap Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

0
Type of Visit -'0 Compl- ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi Routine ()Complaint 0 Foliow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: zW-LE I Arrival Time: Departure Time: r County:
Farm Name: /��ti-- Owner Email:
T
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: r ' fer•G
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:1�--
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [= o ❑ I 0 Al Longitude: ❑ o 0 A =
Desigte Current Destgn CurrentDfes�gn Current,
Swine C*apa city .00p llation W f oultry Capacity, Papollt on Cattle j Cap city Pap A Ion
❑ Wean to Finish I ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Non -La er ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish -' :i ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Potilfi y t El Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
El Turkeys ❑Beef Brood Cowl i
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other i JE1 Other Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
1ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Y -. a
Facility Number: 33 —6 7 Date of Inspection 7 1 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ,� C� Z (l
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes k5J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes No [I NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes En No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes P6N El NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes ❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinations ❑ yes ❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElrNo
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [I Yes❑ NA
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Phone:
Date: 2Z 6?Z D
12128104 Continued

; ..
Facility Number:" 3 -- Date of Inspection % D
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P190 ❑ NA ❑ NE
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Ld'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No - NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
27,
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or. Drawings...:�_,,
12128104

9(f t z
'ton of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency � �,
jvtsion of Water Quality
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farr» Name: �/.+... 11.7... Ab..(................................................................................ C.ounty:. �......�G�^. �. �..........................................
Owner Name:..? 1� 4 n'& .. .... .............................. Phone No: ZJZ Z
Facility Contact: �� rt^ Title: Phone No:
G....................................................,...............................................................................................
itiiaitirrg Address:.a...?� /..? CI �+ + G� .............................. /l%L .7 �Z. Z......................................................... ..........................
., .... ...
Onsite Representative :...... �....... �........................................................... Integrator: C rV ��'t' N
:......::.......
Certified Operator: ............. '?`?............................................. I .................. ............ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm: iZi /&10
r.............. ................. ....................... ....................... ................................................................................................................................ ........ .....................................................
f
Latitude • 6 Longitude =' =1 =11
" ;llesrgu Current
< ,
Design ", , Current ` 0 esign Current
5wrne., Capacity Poptilatron
Poultey'.
Capacity .Population Cattle aCapactI'ulafiun
_ . ty op
❑ W fo Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
L�
Feeder to Finish
pp
❑ Non -Layer
Cl Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other
ElFarrow to Feeder
p
�''�
❑ Farrow to Finish
fg
Total Design Capacity:=
❑ Gilts
.
❑ Boars
- k
Tatal SSLW
�
_
Number Of agoans$ olding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
'W'
`
❑ Spray Field Area
r.
❑ No
Liquid Waste Management System
�y
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance main -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
:��
❑ Yes rN
El Yes❑ Yes
ElYes❑ Yes

v
Facitity Number:
8. 'Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,llolding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �21�
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):.........'...f...11..................................................................................................................................................���
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Leo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
/ ..... ..................
15. Crop type .A �:.`.^.:'.:.....�:.%�....`.11..7..r�'./.�}. �. �'...... �!:2✓r�+!(.................... ....................................................................�No-
016. Do the receiving crops differ rE+ith those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facili ail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
24. Were additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
P P
25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
o,vio'la'tio'nsor'dercient ies' were-notid-during this:visit.- Yoa.will ' eiceive-no•ftiriker, :
VN
. �.eorrOOOt<degce about this'VWt:-: .
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r�C/�,�. Date:

` ivrsro nd Water: Conservation °- O )'ration R "' ie Soil a I evicw
[� sion of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Divisii►n.of WaterQuality - Compliance'Inspection. �E •.,� �E' „ I,5
(] Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q I-ollow-up of DSNVC review Q Other
Facilitv Number � � Date of Inspection LIZ
� S
l Ellle o[' Inspection l_hJ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�.
© Permitted eorot ied [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not Operaational Date Last Operated:
..........................
,r
Farm Name: .
.....:............................................ County.: �=. �► d� ` ............... .
.........
Owner Namc: ,.,,5' [, �Y '1. Phone No: Zr
...%
.... .... .........
Facilitv Contact: " i�1/ ,.,�]% ................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:
....................................................
MailingAddress: r1 . c.. ......... ........... �............................................... ..........................
Q...........7......�-.1.......... Z:
Onsite Representative: ...: 6f.t11.G..•vx:.. ............... ln1el;Fatc)r�7l..I�.'�—f,-1.....................
............
Certified Operator:.... t.... 1:.:........................I............................. Operator Certification Nurnber:..........................................
Location ot• Farin: `j tl'— /
Latitude 0 1 6 Longitude • _ 44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
SwineCapacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ We• n to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
ceder to Finish p ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder 1E1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1111 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding.Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convoyancc ratan -made?
h. If discharge is observed. diet it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. lfdischar e is observed. what is the eslima€eel How in gal/thin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon systeni?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier
��tt
Freeboard (inches): ....................... ...............................................................................................
Structure 5
❑ Yes No '
❑ Yes No
ElYes�-No
❑ Yes N
[:]Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
116199 ' Continued on hack

Facility Number: — Date of Irtspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,'and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
mm
[]Yes l_4. o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑Yes;2o
12. Crop type.W...�l.. f;Nt..�s.r.`................................ ......
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Re r/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. s facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
�: Nn.violations tir. defieiencie's .were noted. during .thisyisit; - Y.ou will.reu' ive nor further.-. I.
• ecjrr-espbndebee; about; this visit.; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
❑ Yes ffl�o
cs ❑ No
❑ Yes 1;�
❑ YesO
❑ Yes O No
[]Yes t'No
❑ Yes 9-No .
❑ Yes .
❑ Yes
❑ YesjN
o
❑ YesN
❑ Yeso
Comments (refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or:any other; comments : I
Use drawings of facility to•better'explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary). I t r
r'
olo r �h i s u ��-�.� , l, �7 c 1. - s t=l-W I s �
tj e f C,-,�s n o t r f< r ur✓ + �' 1 jA- ► -1 w w� �-� S . �c .7 �.
ReviewerlInspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 11/6199

w.
Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number -_49
Farm Name: 5 _tie b -^44 r--,jtcA--
On-Site Representative:_ 44-C �r
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit: Z /
Date of most recent WUP: Z
/ration is'fla ed for a wettable
P J9
acre determination due to failur
Part H eligibility item(s) F1 F F
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: .Z--> pounds
irrigation System(s) -.circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
44stationary
gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

* 1. -4
Revised January 22, 1999
0
Facility Number��
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
3,2
o Lf
s
I.
3 °1_6
i.J
i'! 0 AJ
4vnJ
i%e) ' Lrr
/
Tk e
0 it
�c
,�!
t f
r
t
-
C ^ 4
-e I ! t.
FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant. Dull_ zone_ or Doint numbers may be used in place of field numbers
denendinn nn C AWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

". Divtstonof Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review_
k V.
Dtvtston°of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
-
�a. yr— r
•t;
-Division-ofWat'er Quality - Compliance inspection
�o they Agency Review
-Operation ..
O Routine O Com laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-upofDSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection E� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName:........................................................................................................................ County:.....................
OwnerName: ................................................... .............................. ;_ ....................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilitvContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:f,t,sj`� .. Integrator:.pNFr!v.�,%/�
............ .............,/.
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 4 4 Longitude " ' 1.
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JEI Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish J❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons`. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? El Yes Q�No
b. If discharge is ohscrvcd, did it reach Water of the State'? ([f yes, notify DWQ) El Yes /� No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? _
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If ycs, notify DWQ) [:]Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ YeslNo
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Idcnti ficr:
Freeboard(inches): .Z�......................... 0........I........ ....:.................................... I.................................. ................................... ........... ... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ' f ]/ �}
seepage, etc.) ✓�^
3/23/99 Continued nn 6ack

Facilfty Number: 733— G Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2To
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes PNo
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Q�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
[YNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
El Yes
�No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
&o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Q�No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
�j No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
plVo
/VNO
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
;k'STo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
/ZNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
/C1 Yes
4'No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Ero
yiolatttjr. . . clef cien. ..mere ;noteiil durifng �l�is:v. ...Y.. .will reeeiye �iti, itrthe
:
correspondence:about:th*svisit.•.•.:.•:•,-:•.:.:.::......•.•...::•:•....::•...-.....•. .
answers and/nfi5-i°- 7 ;T i£ 4 !E : -t �E �. ments (refer to gtreshon #) Explain any YES or ay recommendations or any other comments
E......
Use drawmgsof facilitto better explainsituations. {us
ye additional pages as necessary}Et
i
��115� b ®G lL��-r+ v✓><� L` 5 Tr�� hfrf� D✓e�x I��` J6s TZ)
t�U 6,0 /Z-Z4[��
Reviewerinspector Name G
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� _ l l Date: (1y,)
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ONo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes fi!rNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 16No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or /
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes Klo
3/23/99

AIJ5SSoo47
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
05-12-2002
This plan has been prepared for:
Swat Farm, 33-67
Steve Brewer
5127Hwy 58N
Wilson, NC 27896
252-23 7-3382
This plan has been developed by:
Greg Griffin
Edgecombe SWCD
201 St, Andrew Street
P0Box 10
Tarboro, NC 2 7886- 0010
252641-7900
Deveiop r gnature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
4��- � q, n-
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
5y
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002
---------------------------
Cover Page 1
RECEIVED I DENR / Uvyu
Aquifer Protection Section
MAR 12 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,224,800 gals/year
by a 2,400 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5127
Incorporated
8806
Injected
9697
Irrigated
5573
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
5,635
2,230,351
-5,551
--- -- ----- ---------- -------- -- -- - ------- -------- --- --- ----- --
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
Plan for Bermuda grass pasture with small grain overseed.
Field 9, on tract 8503 must not be put into pasture but is included in the plan as a hay field.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------I--------- --------------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field
in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilizati on of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient appli cation amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal
waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comrn.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liauid
Solid
PA
Fen.
Obs/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
r
1000
Source
Total
Use,
RYE
Applic.
Applic.
Tract
Field
I.D.
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
Crop
RYE
I Unit
Period
N
N
N IMethod
Ibs/A
al1A
tons
_1222jgals
tons
2373
13
S7
Marlboro
6.4
4.1
Small Grain Owrseed
1.0
Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
irriR-
50
19.96
0
82.64
0.00
2373
13
S7
Marlboro
6.4
4A
llybrid Bermudagrass
6.5
Tons
311-9/30
*244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97A]
0
403.26
0.00
Pasture
8503
10
S7
Johns
1.7
L6
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19-96
0
32.54
0.00
8503
10
S7
Johns
1.7
1.6
Hybrid Bermudagrass
5-0
Tons
3/1-9130
*188
0
0
Irrig.
188
75.05
0
122-33
0.00
Pasture
8503
6
S7
Duplin
3.2
3.0
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
1 Irrig.
50
19.96
0
59.88
0.00
8503
6
S7
Duplin
3.2
3.0
HybridBermudagrass
5.4
Tons
3/1-9/30
*202
0
0
Irritt.
202
80.64
0
241.92
0.00
Pasture
8503
7
S7
Marlboro
0.9
0.8
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19-96
0
14.97
0.00
8503
7
S7
Marlboro
0.9
0.8
llybrid Bermudagrass
6.4
Tons
311-9130
*240
0
0
Inig.
240
95-81
0
71.86
0.00
Pasture
8503
8
S7
Marlboro
1.8
1.7
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
rIZg.
1 50
19.96
0
34.33
0.00
-- •--- ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------------------...-----..------------------------------------------------------ ------- ------ ---- ----- -
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5112/02 WUT page 1

Wsctp T Tlilivatinn Tahlp
Vpar 1
Field
Source
I.D-
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Cro
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Conrm.
Fert. -
Nutrient
Applied
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
etbod
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
� 1
N
lbs[A
1000
aU
tons
1 is
tons
8
S7
Marlboro
1.8
1.7
Hybrid BermudagraSC
Pasture
6.5
Tons
3/1-9/30
*244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97.41
0
167.54
0.00
F8503
9
S7
Marlboro
0.9
0.8
S.]] Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrilt.
50
998
0
8.18
0-00
9
S7
Marlboro
0.9
0.8
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
6.5
Tons
311-9/30
*325
0
0
Irrig.
325
129.74
0
106.39
0.00
8504
11
S7
Du lin
2.0
1.9
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
'ions
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.96
0
37.33
0.00
8504
11
S7
Duplin
2.0
1.9
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
5.5
Tons
3/1-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig-
206
82.24
0
153.78
0-00
8504
12
S7
I Marlboro
1.4
1.3
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Iniec.
50
11.47
0
14.91
0.00
8504
12
S7
Marlboro
1.4
1.3
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
6.5
Tons
3/1-9/30
*244
0
0
Irriit.
244
97.41
0
126.63
0.00
8504
13
S7
Goldsboro
2.9
2.8
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.96
0
55.29
0.00
8504
13
S7
Goldsboro
2.9
2.8
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
6.5
Tons
3/1-9/30
*240
0
0
Irrig.
240
95.81
0
265.39
0-00
8504
14
S7
Marlboro
2.1
2.0
Small Grain Overseed
1.0
Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irri¢.
50
19.96
0
39.32
0.00
8504
14
S7
Marlboro
2-1
2.0
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
6.5
Tons
3/1-9/30
*244
0
0
Inig.
244
97.41
0
191.89
0.00
r
Manure Solids
Total Arynhed- LQns
040
Total Produced- ton s
000
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract cohurm, symbol - means leased, otherwise, owmed.
256095 Database Version 2.0
2. Symbol * means user entered data
Date Printed. 5/12/02
----------------
WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
2373
13
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
8503
10
Johns
0.50
0.96
8503
6
Duplin
0.40
0.96
8503
7
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
8503
8
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
8503
9
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
8504
11
Duplin
0.40
0.96
8504
12
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
8504
13
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
8504
14
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
- ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------•----------------------------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 lAF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
l50
13.16
30.09
60.17
90.26
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
15.04
30.09
45.13
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
28.21
56.41
84.62
--------------------------------------------- --------••----------.•-------------------------------------- ------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Sludge Page 1 of t

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storaaa-Canacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Li uid
Desl n Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
10/31
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days) "
1
1
162
1
2
147
1
3
153
1
4
155
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
179
1
9
179
1
10
154
1
11
136
1
12
117
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--- -------------- • --
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Capacity Page t of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1:. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing hini/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase -in the dumber of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not emceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions_, and level of management,. unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from• the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Specification Page 1 of 4

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
1.1. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by,the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------...---------------------------..----..-...--
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Specification Page 2 of 4

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
- __ •- - - - -------------------------------------------------.----- -------------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-- ---------------------------- ------------------------- _ ----- ---------..
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Specification Page 4 of 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 9
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs i" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundeover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
------------------------------------------•----------------------------- •-------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Crop Note Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 11, 6
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1. 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 13
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this.time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 14, 7, 8, 9
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October IS -November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/dri11 row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- I--------------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s)- 10
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 11, 6
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
1n the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5". optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
-----------------------------------------------.•------------------------------------••----•------- ---
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 13
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 14, 7, 8
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs l" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
------------------ ---------------------------------- -- -
- - - -------------
256085 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-12-2002 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

A
roicnaei r. r=asiey, Uovumur
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 15, 2003
. .r
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Steve Brewer
5127 Hi hwa „58 N
Wilson, North ;Carolina 27896':
y Subject: Notice of Violation" "rt
Recommendatidn td,Enforce',
Brewer Sh'arpsbiirg Farm;,
Permit No. AWS330067
Edgecombe County
'r
Dear Mr.- Brewer: { `"
On June 23, 2003, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection at the subject operation. The inspection noted the following violations of your
Certificate of Coverage and General Permit:
Permit Condition V.3., states that the maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not
exceed that specified in the CAWMP.
A review of on site records indicated that there were four (4) separate occasions where the
freeboard levels in you lagoon were less than required by your Certified Animal Waste Plan and
General Permit.
Weekly freeboard records indicated that your secondary lagoon had 15 inches on February 28,
March 7, March 21, and again on April 11, 2003. Your lagoon is designed to have a minimum of
one foot of structural freeboard plus the amount of a 25 year/24 hour storm event which totals
approximately 19 inches in your area of the State.
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
phone [phone]
facsimile [phone]
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
*A
NCDENR

Mr. Steve Brewer
Page 2
Permit Condition 111. b., e. requires that notification be given to the Division of Water Quality
whenever your waste lagoon fails to maintain a storage capacity equal to or greater than the level
required in Permit Condition V. (3) .
The Raleigh Regional Office received no high freeboard notification regarding your facility on
any of the four dates previously described.
Please note that violations of the General Permit and Certificate of Coverage are subject to civil
penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation, and in some cases up to $ 25,000.00 per
day, per violation.
Upon receipt of this Notice you should prepare a written response and forward it to the Raleigh
Regional Office within ten days of your receipt. If you feel that you have justification that these
violations were caused by events or circumstances beyond your control you should include them
along with your response. The Raleigh Regional Office will review your response and forward it
to the Director for his review. In the absence of any such justification the Director will proceed
with the enforcement action.
If you have any questions concerning this matter you should call Buster Towel] at (919) 571-
4700.
2Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Sol] & Water Conservation District
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

BREWER.
.
PO BOX 97 • ELM CITY, NC 27822
PHONE [phone] - FAX [phone]
1-888-488-0082
JULY 28, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MR. KENNETH SCHUSTER, P.E.
NCDENR
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
1st In
66tvi c e
SUBJECT: WRITTEN RESPONSE
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
BREWER SHARPSBURG FARM
PERMIT NO. AWS330067
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DEAR MR:SCHUSTER,
OF COURSE YOU ARE AWARE OF THE VERY WET WINTER AND SPRING ALL
FARMERS ARE FACED WITH THIS YEAI,OUR FARM AT SHARPSBURG HAS TWO
LAGOONS. THE FIRST LAGOON HAS A LIFT STATION WHICH FEEDS THE SECOND
LAGOON. SO WHEN IT RAINS TWO INCHES THE EFFECT ON THE SECOND LAGOON IS
FOUR INCHES.
OUR PROBLEM WAS DURING THIS EXCESSIVE WET PERIOD -WE KNOW THAT FREE
BOARD IS APPROXIMATELY 19 INCHES ON OUR LAGOONS. THE REASON FOR NOT
CALLING AND REPORTING LESS THAN 19 INCHES OF FREEBOARD WAS THAT ON
EACH OCCASION WE WERE ABLE TO CATCH SEVERAL DAYS OF PRETTY SUNSHINE.
THIS PRETTY WEATHER ALLOWED US TIME TO PUMP ON OUR SPRAY FIELDS WHICH
WF-j?F SF.F.1)ED WITIJ WWINTF.R RYF. GRASS. THFF. LAGOONS WF.RF, RAPIDLY
PUMPED DOWN WITHIN COMPLIANCE. IF WE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO
IRRIGATE WE WOULD HAVE CERTAINLY CALLED MR BUSTER TOWELL AT YOUR
OFFICE. WHEN MR TOWELL MADE HIS INSPECI'ION SEVERAL WEEKS AGE: HE
SHOWED US WE WERE NOT IN COMPLIANCE. I AM SORRY THIS HAPPENED AND
HOPE THIS LETTER EXPLAINS THE SITUATION WE WERE IN. HOPEFULLY A FINE
WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.
THANKS FOR YOUR'IIME

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
John S. Brewer
Swat Hog Farm
5127 Highway 58 N
Wilson NC 27896
Dear John S. Brewer:
Aw0fad
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAA. RESOURCES..
December 30, 1999
1
'JAR P
�11f L�l ll� fL !
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 33=67
Edgecotnl5FCounty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
4��' / /,��
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
919/5714700
File Access Record
SECTION
TIME/DATE
NAME
REPRESENTING:
Guidelines for Access: The staff of tha€;Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read carefully the following
guidelines before signing the form;,
1. We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision is available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
FACILITY NAME
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
C(
Si ature and a e of Firm/Business Date
Please attach a to thAs fo m
COUNTY
Time In Time Out

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secreta
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., t
fl
John S. Brewer
Steve Brewer Farm
5208 W Nash St
Wilson NC 27893
Dear Mr. Brewer:
MOMWA
EDEHNR
APR -r1991,
ran rf.4tc1
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
-Steve Brewer Farm
Facility Number 33-.€6- � 7
Edgecombe County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997, This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N�� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10°k post -consumer paper

/lw--. 3,30" IF
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
DATE 03/16/99
Producer: STEVE BREWER
Location: 5127 HWY 58 NORTH
WILSON, NC 27896
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: FEEDER TO FINISH SWINE FARM
Number of Animals: 7680
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when' it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
Page 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (GALLONS, FT3, TONS, ETC.)
7680 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 14592 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7680 hogs x 2.3 PAN/hogs/year = 17664 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT PULLS SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM "" ' LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW
PER AC AC USED
APPLIC.
TIME
317 1 thru 4
GOA
BH
6.5
325
10.69
3474.25
317 :lthru4
GOA
SG
1
100
10.69
1069
317 5 thru 8
GOA
SH
6.5
325
11.01
3578.25
317-5thru8
GOA
SG
1
100
11.01
1101
317 9 thru 11
NOA
BH
6.1
305
10.53
3211.65
317-9thru11
NOA
SG
1
100
10.53
1053
317
12 thru 13 RA
BH
4.5
225
317
-12thru13 RA
SG
1
100
317
14 thru 15 NOB
BH
6.1
305
317
-14thru15 NOB
SG
1
100
Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meepng the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.
4.29 965.25
4.29 429
3.82 1165.1
3.82 382
0
Total 16428.5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 3
TABLE 2: ACRES CONTINUED FROM TABLE 1
' (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT PULL 901L TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD
COMM
' LBS
LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE
AW N
PER ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
317 16 WAB BH 5.5
275
2.86
786.5
317 716 WAB SG 1
100
2.86
286
317 17 NOA BH 6.1
305
1.78
542.9
317 -17 NOA SG 1 100 1.78 17$
0
0
0
Total 1793.4
Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
"Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
over seeding.
" Ibs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
LBS N
APPLY
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS PER UNIT
MONTH
BH
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -HAY
TONS
50
APR-AUG
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
MAR-JUNE
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVER SEED
AC
50
SEPT-MAR
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS
AC
110
APR -MAY
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
AC
100
SEPT-APR
BC
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
APR-AUG
BP
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -PASTURE
TONS
50
APR-AUG
FC
TALL FESCUE -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
SEPT APR
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
SB
SOY BEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
DSB
DOUBLE CROP SOY BEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
CO
COTTON
TONS
0.1
MAY-JUN
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
OCT-MAR

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 40.34 16428.5
TABLE 2 4.64 1793.4
TOTAL 44.98 18221.9
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 17664
*** BALANCE -557.9
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately .29 HI. 6 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your.facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within AL4eet of the top of the dike.
7mA.s

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 5
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation desig signer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates
and amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid
Call your Agriment Services representative for assistance in determining
the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate
prior to beginning the application of your waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION: SEE ATTACHMENT

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Plans and Specifications
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Local NRCS office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land
to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an updated Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips and Standard
390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infil-
tration rate such that runoff does not occur off -site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
event, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
Page 6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See standard
393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways,
or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
into water courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24-hour storm event in addition to one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and
and shall be fenced, as necessary to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 8
21. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
pre plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
22. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
23. Waste shall be tested within sixty days of utilization and soil shall
be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
years.
24. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina State regulations or other States' regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NAME OF FARM:6t�cvt. �cr�
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we), understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
I (we) know that an expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there be no discharge
of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state
from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and
will be available for review by DWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that 1 must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rate that no runoff
occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: STEVE BREWER
SIGNATURE:
NAME OF MANAGER (If different from owner):
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
AFFILIATION: Agriment Services Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville 51
SIGNATURE: lle502114wl DATE:
Page 9

ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN.•
FACILITYNUMBER 33-68
FARM NAME: STEVE BREWER FARM
OWNER NAME: STEVE BREWER
DESIGN CAPACITY: 7680 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS WUP IS A REVISION OF THE WUP COMPLETED ON 4/5/97 BY TECH
SPECIALIST RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
THIS PLAN WAS CREATED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN AS -BUILT WETTED
ACRE INTERPRETATION COMPLETED AND INSTALLED BY AVERY JARMAN
IRRIGATION SPECIALIST. AVERY JARMAN COMPLETED THE PART OF THE
DESIGN DEVOTED TO THE TRAVELING GUN (SEE TABLE 2 TRAVELING GUN
SETTINGS). DUE TO CONSERVATIVE FIGURES IN THE INITIAL DESIGN
PHASE, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY THIS PLAN THAT THERE IS
ADEQUATE LAND AVAILABLE UNDER IRRIGATION TO SATISFY THE
AGRONOMIC REQUIREMENTS OF THIS FARM. THIS DETERMINATION WAS
MADE BY ACTUAL GROUND TROOPING OF THE INSTALLED SYSTEM BY
IRRIGATION SPECIALIST AVERY JARMAN.
THE APPLICATION WINDOWS IN THIS PLAN ARE GENERAL IN REGARDS TO
THE SMALL GRAIN OVERSEED. FOR GUIDANCE ON THE WINDOWS AND
RATES THAT MUST BE USED PLEASE REVERT TO THE GUIDANCE MEMO
FROM NCSU (INCLUDED).
BY ASCS FIGURES, THERE MAY BE AS MUCH AS 40 ACRES NOT INCLUDED
AS WETTED ACREAGE FOR THIS FACILITY. HOWEVER, MR. BREWER OWNS
A HONEY WAGON AND DESIRES TO UTILIZE THIS EQUIPMENT AS NEEDED
TO APPLY LAND NOT INCLUDED IN THE WETTED ACREAGE ON THE FARM.
IF UTILIZED THESE AREAS SHOULD BE MEASURED AND APPLIED AT
PROPER AGRONOMIC/HYDRAULIC RATES AND WINDOWS.
ALL FIELDS MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
WHEN USED. MR BREWER PLANS TO APPLY HIS WASTE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE
AGRONOMIC/HYDR.A.ULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
3/16/99 3/16/99
ONNIE G. KE DY JR. S VE BREWER
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST OWNER/OPERATOR

I
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and type of Equiprrrent:as
Field Not
and
Hydrant Noe
Travel
Speed
(Wmin)
Application
Rate
(in/hr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (ft) Length (ft)-
Wetted
Diameter
(feel)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(inches) @Gun (psi) Reel (psi) Pattern3
ca,4 s��d
-Comments
-
s
- 32-
A40.
y
�-,)
Y>>�
Imo-
�) a�
3�
.tie
3z
�_�
la;
3o a5 �4� .
- 3
aS
2Lto
2160z)
30 (545 a_ 3
7- C]
s
2
y9
b
31 00 3.a9
ti09
30 a- $J
�- `i
y
yoS
36 17S rx
j
12
31 a(A 3 : 3
T 3
3 i y.Rq
-�7f1
31 ace 39
�- 1-3
13
31
,1- iy
2.;
IC >
31
tl- (o ,
2- i
1
3 o?(a Cv
r)
51-1
! 93
1 r�l
�ic2es
uy QFl
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in degrees.
Ir.rigafion Parameters USDA-NRCS
t7S • 1995 page-2 . North Caiolin,—.) r .

I
a

llb 'hh
Z5
r s
C$
� �• I
��r
�lr ,
� G 1
reh�
C
Ou •6D
d7�'
•
,Qbh
.�
gb,I
le
a .
li: I+mac
,007F,
ei i
e . JInc
/V� �
��
'IVY
Itr•
r�`!�
� ����
its fad
fl na ��o
d'4��
�a�'tS

go
Jbftr3m,
Melmsm
poll. 4" N
A ASKS
AY
ZOO

r7,
r. .
.IFI'�,'
y��
_
;.'
i. -
-
-
+r, -.
;r '
1
Ci .
<
,. d

Norm Ceroim Stele Urmnry is a land- Department of Crop Science
grant v*w3Ay end a eor seusm iduulion
of the U*mty d f+lorm carofr+a
College d Agrfcutture and Llfa Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695.7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7969 (tax)
Memorandum
TO: North Carolina Certified T nical Specia fists
FROM: Dr. Jim Green, Chairman
NC State University Forage roduction Workgroup
DATE: June 29, 1998 I/
SUBJECT: Crop Management Practices for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC State University Forage Production Workgroup, a group comprised
of NC State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
There are limited documented research responses of some of these practices on the many soils
and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken the available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestions, the Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes.
Bermuda Overseeded With Cereal Rye and Annual Ryegr+ass
Currently two types of ` ryegrass" are being used for winter overseeding in fields used for
animal waste management. ea rl is a winter annual smallgrain that looks similar to
wheat, barley and oats. Annual ryetJrass is a winter annual grass that looks much like tall
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during the winter on bermuda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda yields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combination of bermuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between 1-2
tons more per acre than bermuda growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount of
PAN /acre for the year is about 100 lbs more than for bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and
annual ryegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selected.

North Cards Wle ltnireaty is a tend Department of Crop Science
gram wworsky and a cnrstluert Ycouton
of The tkirKW a Norm Cam"
M
Cottage of agriculture And Ule ScIwVes
Campus Box 7620
ReJeigh, NC 27695-7620
919.5152647
919.615.7959 (fax)
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be. 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If rye
growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for -the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior
to heading or April 7, which ever comes'first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with Bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. T— he'alast
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height. .
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

• frr� A�t,
Al V3
5.1
id
Alt
a
� r � � -� y 'mac ©' ; •4 � ; {,�
ft• .� � ` � .tom ~1 I
Q4 1 z
*ty�+tom' ■t
ot
" • ! d � � / 7Yi`1r ~ 1 � � !' rr' tit i „t�p ,�'-. 4• �. % , ,`. _ �'� ~ i
4J mil!-•' - s - ?a i; \ _t'a�i .-�5 q :, I� _
,`� - ]_ 7� Y1` � [� .J.-'nr+a. wf�:.ti1� -i.`�, i i�`v�, F`�1Y�y .� --�• '`
� "~ 4111 -.�i ;n _ - '�� - s `rig � S E • e . ` !; � ti ., �w,i�• s'r -
yam—. s `=�:� - . � 1 • � ' - � r^_ ~ -
r_.ti;' i r _ •.y'. .�. _�- ."r< �y. •' � �,-s� _ ''" -. _ '~at ��•�tz:•�1~1 :,
�' � � � ..1. �'�_•; 12F ���r '1 r �'�rt,'(1i•..;_ •-(L`'�r � �e..i�y." iT• �/ }:r_e� -,r '.
r' i Y�+ -* . �ys{t - � ..rl. r.4 r� .Y,r Id s�..-,�.�. r ..
. . - -�`k't a;r%� id'-i•� `��r.—jr. •s w�, ,�R
�—i��i• i�iiiil� ter• " -

b

/4k.�5 33 006V
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facilitv with exterior lots
Nlethods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the a�griate block
fi-�•. Stc T,�tc 2 l Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
r C-AAte. f}s b';I' U Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
1� has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
f�l the contract i;rees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ade. j � _rr�+✓
Affiliation 4l -4'Zfr'rnc:;D�J Date Work Completed:
Address (Aa cy)(7 a,71ZIA 3 314,'I1 AIC Phone No.:,, 2 -J&,y-3900
Signatur . Date:
The following signatuKe block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that 1 (wd) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. 1
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and llortalitv_Management (SD, SI, WUP. RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational_ _
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone'No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- august t, 1997 5

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
F

QROWER: STEVE BREWER RETROFIT DESIGNED BY: JWR
ADDRESS: 5127 HWY 58 N CHECKED BY: JNT
WILSON, NC 27896 DATE: 05/29/97
COUNTY: EDGECOMBE SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and 180 days of
temporary storage. The time required for the planned fluid level (permanent and
temporary storage) to be reached may vary due to site conditions, weather, flushing
operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days of temporary storage for:
(1) manure production of animals, (2) excess fresh water storage, (3) rainfall in
excess of evaporation, (4) storage for the 25 year / 24 hour storm for the location,
(5) and, if applicable, an additional "heavy rain" storage volume for chronic rainfall
events.. Allocation for any additional fresh water usage is also included in the
temporary storage. The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals
will be fairly constant throughout the year, but excess rainfall will vary from year to year.
The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but
this storage volume must always be available.
A staff gauge must be installed in the lagoon that indicates the start pumping and stop
pumping levels. The start pumping level is the maxium liquid level under normal operating
conditions. The stop pumping level is the minimum liquid level under normal
operation to maintain required treatment volume and depth. Pumping can be started
and stopped anywhere between these two elevations for operating convenience as site
conditions permit, such as weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste
without runoff or leaching. However, it is recommended that the lagoon be kept
pumped down as much as possible.
Land application of wastewater is recognized as an acceptable method of disposal.
Methods of application include solid set, center pivot, guns, and traveling guns. Care
should be taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is required that the treatment lagoon be precharged to one—half the treatent volume
or as otherwise specified on the lagoon design drawings before wastes are introduced.
The purpose is to prevent excessive odors during start—up. Precharging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should
be covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete, flush buildings with
recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached Waste Utilization Plan shall be followed. The plan recommends
sampling and testing of waste before land application.
Murphy Family Farms Engineering P.O. Box 759, Rose Hill NO 28458 [phone]

GRQWER: STEVE BREWER RETROFIT DESIGNED BY: JWR
ADDRESS: 5127 HWY 58 N CHECKED BY: JNT
WILSON, NC 27896 DATE: 05/29/97
COUNTY: EDGECOMBE SHEET 2 OF 2
3. Begin temporary storage pump ---out of the lagoon when the fluid level reaches the
elevation 103.40 as marked by the staff gauge. Stop pump —out when the fluid level
reaches elevation 99.60. This temporary storage, less 25 year / 24 hour storm,
contains 200277 cubic feet or 1498069 gallons.
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is one (1) inch and the
recommended maximum application rate is 0.3 inches per hour. Refer to the waste
utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the lagoon mowed
annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded or damaged areas and establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around waste utilization
fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will not be applied in open ditches.
Do not pump within 200 feet of a residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall
be applied in a manner such that waste will not reach other property and public
rights —of —way.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants into waters
of the United States. Waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by either discharge or by over —spraying. The Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management,
has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
Murphy Family Farms Engineed7g P.O. Box 759, Rose Hill NC 26458 [phone]

Mortality Management Methods
(check which mcchod(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering� at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
AT- 5 rrF- t- Couxx--n OA4 Syr -rx��
❑. Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which' in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health_ (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
Dccembcr 18. 1996

M WIM
�/�
AaE.+.
Flak 1V1 LlVil VYQL Vtlltl-dlS wn0 WcrC
deciding upon North Carolina's fate.
Duke University is located at Durham .`�,'
- ��, �•'°
and on the campus is the historic chapel.
The Stagville Center for Preservationr-`.z
��'
4 r
Technology, offers exhibits, research''"`
and educational instruction on the art of
jr
r
Preservation. J �. R
=�
•_;
slo
ea
•'
tf`r
• W '1
ALL
z
'
_1^'y.. - •. ���
ASV'„ IN
I]), '., t_
}
N
Q
)3.
L, LM
3jtr
U
t
is
+• n
Ms
13
Uk.'
LW
i t •s
f s
. LI:L
,
,�
r �.t ,.,
9
UIA
y
iLu
LLD
low UM
j) .3 .1 , , an J.
, �1 ` (•l', �1 V ��. may, S:e
LLLJ
1 -
1 s J - 1
1LX
im
Al
g �
Eno River State Park
Eno River State Park follows a 20-mile
stretch of its namesake river. li Iles three a
miles northwest of Durham off State I
Road 1569 and covers 1,568 acres.
Primitive camping, nature hiking, Wintel

5 I A I L. U1, 1,4uK 3 n i\vu,,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES A
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA £ €
5455 N NE C j
I144 50' za+11. TO NIC. 97 (nOCKY MOUNT EXIIJ IR CKY MOUNT) 141 47'3 2 360 000 FE
1 xl 1 ° jol Q
I733 0 \� /�Z %/I20 1111
IN
RIA
'�: A /I •,. SIl'all'I15 13-� r / i `.• s
fry' a'acm 4 `� ! Vim/ - •i. / �fJS .d,{dsv _� d - ` N ..... 1
1403
aQ q'-:'Cem . . ! -\� 4 ' 1 , ` - % .. •
♦ Il ~♦ / ! + f i~� r ,i' „'Cem;
Dove1445
149
1136 ,w
I 1 lEur
Ito 1405
29
1405 n
:cem
of
Cem::n a17
!
a
a
\ n .'/, •NO3 ! Gospel Missionary
Ch
29 !
141 :Cem
I& '• .. O N 1 A' � ` Cem:. a
11 ♦ \

GROWER: STEVE BREWER RETROFIT DESIGNED BY: JWR
ADDRESS: 5127 HWY 58 N CHECKED BY: JNT
WILSON, NC 27896 DATE: 06/02/97
COUNTY: EDGECOMBE SHEET 1 OF 2
Emergency Action_ Plan
Using this outline as guidance, you should develop a specific emergency action plan for your
waste handling system.. This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes
reach surface water or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should
make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be available to all
employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and breaks could happen at any time. Your
plan should follow this format:
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to problems are listed below:
A. Lagoon overflow —possible solutions are:
add soil to berm to temporarily increase elevation of dam —any permanent
alteration of the dam should be approved by a qualified professional engineer
or qualified technical specialist
pump wastes to field at an acceptable rate
stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waters) ---hold waste in house if possible
call a pumping contractor
make sure no surface water is entering lagoon
NOTE: The above listed activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded
the temporary storage level.
B. Runoff from waste application field —actions include:
immediately stop waste application
create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
C. Leakage from the waste distribution system:
pipes and sprinklers —actions include:
— stop recycle (flushing system) pump
— stop irrigation pump
— close valves to eliminate further discharge
— separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
flush system, houses, solids separators —actions include:
— stop recycle (flushing system) pump
— stop irrigation pump
— make sure no siphon effect has been created
— separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
D. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks —possible action*:
dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage put in a submersible
pump, and pump back into lagoon
if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and
fill holes and compact with a clayey soil
other holes may be likewise temoorarily oluaaed with clav soil
Murphy Family Farms Engineering P.O. Box 759, Rose Hill NC 28456 [phone]

GROWER: STEVE BREWER RETROFIT DESIGNED BY: JWR
ADDRESS: 5127 HWY 58 N CHECKED BY: JNT
WILSON, NC 27896 DATE: 06/02/97
COUNTY: EDGECOMBE SHEET 2 OF 2
*Lagoon problems require the consultation of an individual experienced in the
design and construction of lagoons for permanent repair measures.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the waste reach any surface water?
B. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
A. During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office, at 919-571-4700
after hours, emergency number: 910-733-3942. Your phone calf should
include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of incident from
item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, and the location or direction
of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions, what corrective
measures have been undertaken, and the seriousness of the situation.
B. If spill leaves, or is likely to leave, property or enters surface waters, call
local emergency management service (EMS) at 919-641-7843.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
D. Contact local Soil and Water Conservation District Natural Resources Conservation
Service office at 919-641-7900 for advice/technical assistance. The
Extension Service can be reached at 919-641-7815 for advice/technical assistance.
E. Contact Murphy Family Farms Land and Nutrient Management Department at 910-
269-2111 for advice/technical assistance.
4. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify
the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
EDGECOMBE COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
PO BOX 129, TARBORO, NC 27886
919-641-7815
EDGECOMBE COUNTY SOIL AND CONSERVATION SERVICE
PO BOX 10, TARBORO, NC 27886
919— 641— 7900
EDGECOMBE COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PO BOX 10, TARBORO, NC 27886
919— 641— 7843
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
3800 BARRETT DR., RALEIGH, NC 27611
919-571-4700
Murphy Family Farms Engineering P.O. Box 759, Rose Hill NC 28458 [phone]

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Llauld Systems
Flush Duncrs Accumulation of solids BY Flush system Is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
&azRemove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where -
pest breeding Is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 Inches over mono than 30% of surface.
Excesslvc Vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other Impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter,
ems
Feeders Fccd Spillage Cq' Dcslgn, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g,,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
t3-0'Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., .7 - 10
day Interval during summer; 15-30 day Interval
during winter),
Fee
• Accumu
AM1C - Novcrnber 11, 1996, Page I
residues W Reducc molsture accumulation within and
around Immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by Insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (c:g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
molslure grain products),
© Inspect far and remove or break up accumulated
solids In filter strips around feed storage as
needed,

Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects. Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ EIIminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals Is
minimal.
❑ Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (I.e., Inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed),
Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems day Interval during summer, I5-30 day In
during winter) wher6 manure Is loaded for land
application or disposal.
,❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure.
stockpiles,
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manuro handling areas as needed.
For more lnforrnaiion contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695.76177,
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause I3MPs to Mfnlmtze odor Site Speclfic precticcs
Farmstead Swine production Vcgetatfvc or wooded buffers;
El Recommended best management practices;
Good Judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces Dirty manure -covered animals W Dry floors
Floor surfaces - Wet manure -covered floors 611 Slotted floors;
Q�Walerers located overstaffed floors;
© Feeders at high end of sold floors;
G Scrape manure buildup from floors;'
El Underfloor ventilation for drying
Mandre collection pits Urine; 91, Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial microblal decomposition or scrape;
d Undeffloor ventllation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; Fin malatennnce;
Dust a EfYlelent air movement
Indoor surfaces Dust Washdown between groups of animals;
d Feed additives;
O Feeder covers;
Er"'Fced delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Mush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon t7 Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling 0 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys Agitation during wastewater _ 0 Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation T T T
conveyance
Pit recharge points Agitation of recycled lagoon Extend rccitarge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits arc filling with antl-siphon vents
Lift stations Agitation during sump tank- 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Ouisidc drain collection . Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source Cause BNPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater Extend discharge point of pipes undemeath
lagoon conveyance . lagoon liquid Ievel
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions; lg" Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mlxing; &�'Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
I;"Minimum agitation when.pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; , EV'Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind, -
nozzles . Wind drill ❑ Minlmum recommended operating pressure;
R"'Pump Intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface . Mixing while tilling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptyhg Cl Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Scaling basin surface • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Extend dral6pipc outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling; level;
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge - Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil Injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets 0 Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, Volatile gas emissions while q Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field drying ❑ Soil Incorporation within 48 firs.;
surfaces
❑ SPrcad In tlffn uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑ Proven blological additives or ox idants
Dead animals 0 Carcass decomposition V Proper disposltlon of carcasses
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposilion ❑ Complete covering of carcasses In burial plis;
pils ❑ proper locetion/construction of disposal pill
Incinerators Incomplete combustion ❑ Secondary stack burners
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Source Cause BMPs io Minimize Odor Site Speellic Praclices K
Standing water around • improper drainage; Orada and landscape such that wafer drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information :
Available From
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 Rulc/BMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
'Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; SBAE 128.88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAR 129-88
NCSU • BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAB 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAS Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program; NPPC Manual
NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor ; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns In Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5

ANAEROBIC LAGOON INSTALLATION FOR NCACSP
AGRIMENT SERVICES, INC.
P.O. BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
(919)568-24201(919)658-0707
,33-�7 - Ra--/3
(AGREEMENT NUMBER)
THE ANAEROBIC LAGOON DESIGNED FOR_fcv�
HAS BEEN INSTALLED ON THIS FARM IN ACCORDANCE WITH
MRCS STANDARDS.
HERBERT C. FOXIJ JR. PE
.11-'�f--,1
DATE
is I it...
CARD
CuDt,,dY'�
-o - (SEAL)

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN FN=33-67 Page 1
DATE 10/22/97
Producer: Steve Brewer
Location: 5127 HWY 58 N
WILSON, NC 27896
Telephone: [phone]
Type.Operation: FEEDER TO FINISH
Number of Animals: 2400
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Wrth special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (GALLONS, FT3, TONS, ETC.)
2400 hags x 1.9 tons wastelhogslyear = 4560 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2400 hogs x 2.3 PANftgslyear = 5520 Ibs. PANtyear
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES LEASED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE 8� CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM
}'
*LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
8503 6 DPA —BH—6 300
3
900
8503 —6 FP —A SG 1 54
3
150
8503 7 MAB 13H 6 300
0.75
225
8503 —7 MAB SG i 50
0.75
37.5
8503 8 MAS BH 6 300
1.72
516
8503 —8 MAB SG 1 50
1.72
86
8503 9 MAB BH 6 300
0.82
246
8503 -Y9 MAB SG 1 50
0.82
41
8503 10 JO BH 5 250
1.63
407.5
8503 —10 JO SG 1 50
1.63
81.5
8504 11 MAB BH fi 300
1.87
561
Total
3251.5
Indicates that this field is being over seeded (.e. interpianted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE. The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 3
TABLE 2: ACRES CONTINUED FROM TABLE 1
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT F1ELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS COMM
'*
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC AC
USED
8504
—11
MAS
SG
1
50
1.87
93.5
8504
12
MAB
BH
6
300
1.3
390
8504
— 12
MAB
SG
1
50
1.3
65
8504
13
GOA
BH
6.5
325
2.77
900.25
8504
—13
GOA
SG
1
50
2.77
138.5
8504
14
MAB
BH
6
300
1.97
591
8504
—14
MAB
SG
1
50
1.97
98.5
Total
2276.75
— Indicates that this field is being over seeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
over seeding.
* Ibs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROPCODE CROP
BH
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -HAY
C
CORN
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVER SEED
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
BC
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -CON GRAZED
BP
HYBRID BERMUDA GRASS -PASTURE
FC
TALL FESCUE -CON GRAZED
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
SB
SOY BEANS
DSB
DOUBLE CROP SOY BEANS
W
WHEAT
LBS N APPLY
UNITS PER UNIT MONTH
TONS 50 APR-SEPT
BUSHELS 1.25 MAR-JUNE
AC
50
SEPT-NOV
AC
110
APR -MAY
AC
100
SEPT-NOV
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
BUSHELS
2
FEB-MAR

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 9.79 3251.5
TABLE 2 6.04 2276.75
TOTAL 15.83 5528.25
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 5520
*** BALANCE -8.25
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 579s, pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within LZ feet of the top of the dike.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 5
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates
and amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid
Call your Agriment Services representative for assistance in determining
the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate
prior to beginning the application of your waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION: SEE ATTACHMENT

ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN.
FACILITY NUMBER 33-67
FARV NAME: SWAT HOG FARM SHARPSBURG
OWNER NAIVE: JOHNS. BREWER
DESIGN CAPACITY.• 2400 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS WUP WAS CREATED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CERTIFIED
IRRIGATION DESIGN COMPLETED ON THIS FARM. THIS WUP IS
DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE USE OF A HONEYWAGON TO
APPLY THE SWINE EFFLUENT. FIVE TO TEN FOOT BORDERS
WERE USED TO FIELD DITCHES AND WOODS LINES. IT WILL
TAKE A HIGH LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT TO MAINTAIN THESE
AREAS DURING APPLICATION OF WASTE. IT IS THE
SUGGESTION OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIALIST THAT TRAVEL
LANES OF APPLICATION BE DESIGNATED SO THAT WASTE IS NOT
APPLIED IN DITCHES OR WOODED AREAS THAT MAY BE
CLASSIFIED AS "WATERS OF THE STATE". MR. BREWER SHOULD
TAKE SPECIAL NOTICE OF HIS APPLICATION FIELDS WITH
REGARDS TO COMPACTION OF THE SOILS DUE TO USE OF
APPLICATION EQUIPMENT. THE CLAYEY SOILS SHOULD BE
AERATED AS NEEDED. THE YIELDS FOR THE SOIL TYPE
MARLBORO WERE OBTAINED DURING A CONVERSATION WITH A
DISTRICT TECHNICIAN FROM EDGECOMBE COUNTY SWCD ON
I0/22/97. ALL FIELDS MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR BREWER PLANS TO APPLY HIS
WASTE I•N ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECE'IC WASTE ANALYSIS
NOT TO EXCEED THE AGRONOMIC/HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE
SOILS.
I0/22/97
RONNE G. KENNEDY JR.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Plans and Specifications
Page 6
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Local NRCS office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land
to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an updated Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips and Standard
390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infil-
tration rate such that runoff does not occur off -site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
event, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See standard
393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways,.
or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
into water courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24-hour storm event in addition to one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and
and shall be fenced, as necessary to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
19. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 8
21. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
pre plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
22. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
23. Waste shall be tested within sixty days of utilization and soil shall
be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
years.
24. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina State regulations or other States' regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 9
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER ! MANAGER AGREEMENT
l (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
I (we) know that an expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. l (we) also understand that there be no discharge
of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state
from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and
will be available for review by DWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rate that no runoff
occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY WNER: Steve Brewer �}
SIGNATURE: DATE
NAME OF MANAGER (f different from owner):
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
AFFILIATION: Agriment Services Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaviile N 255
SIGNATURE: DATE:

NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE - NC_NMP
Field Background Information
Field Name: 13
Soil Map Unit: GOLDSBORO 0-8
Total ASCS Acres: 2.9
Total Useable Acres: 2.77
Soil Sampling Date : <ENTER>
Soil Test Class
Soil Test Results:
pH Acid CEC CBS P-I K-I Cad Mg% Mn-1 Zn-I Cu-I
Field Irrigation Information
Average Soil Depth : 3.0+
Available_Water Holding Capacity - 1.5 feet : 1.7
Maximum Irrigation Rate - inches per hour : 0.50
Maximum Amount per Irrigation Event - inches: 0.96
LIMITATIONS: This program is based on the best available data.
Since many uncontrollable variables can affect plant growth
and nutrient requirements, North Carolina State University Cooperative
Extension Service is not resposible for any losses incurred from
the use of this program. The software is provided 'AS IS' and
without warr-anty as to -performance.
-Printed :10/22/1997

NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE - NC_NMP
Field Background Information
Field Name: 10
Soil Map Unit: JOHNS 0-8
Total ASCS Acres: 1.7
Total Useable Acres: 1.63
Soil Sampling Date : <ENTER>
Soil Test Class
Soil Test Results:
pH Acid CEC %BS P-I K-I Cad Mgt Mn-I Zn-I Cu-1
Field Irrigation Information
Average Soil Depth : 3.0+
Available Water Holding Capacity - 1.5 feet 1.9
Maximum Irrigation Rate - inches per hour 0.50
Maximum Amount per Irrigation Event - inches: 0.96
LIMITATIONS: This program is based on the best available data.
Since many uncontrollable variables can affect plant growth
and nutrient requirements, North Carolina State University Cooperative
Extension Service is not resposible for any losses incurred from
the use of this program. The software is provided 'AS IS' and
without warranty as to performance.
Printed :10/22/1997

NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE - NC_NMP
Field Background Information
Field Name: 6
Soil Map Unit: DUPLIN 0-8
Total ASCS Acres: 3.2
Total Useable Acres: 3
Soil Sampling Date <ENTER>
Soil Test Class
Soil Test Results:
PH Acid CEC CBS P-I K-I Cad Mgt Mn-I Zn-I Cu-I
Field Irrigation Information
Average Soil Depth : 3.0+
Available Water Holding Capacity - 1.5 feet 2.0
Maximum Irrigation Rate - inches per hour 0.40
Maximum Amount per Irrigation Event - inches: 0.96
LIMITATIONS: This program is based on the best available data.
Since many uncontrollable variables can affect plant growth
and nutrient requirements, North Carolina State University Cooperative
Extension Service is not resposible for any losses incurred from
the use of this program. The software is provided 'AS IS' and
without warranty as to performance,
Printed :10/22/1997

NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE - NC_NMP
Field Name:
Soil Map Unit:
Total ASCS Acres:
Total Useable Acres:
Soil Sampling Date :
Soil Test Class
Soil Test Results:
pH Acid CEC %BS
Field Background Information
7,8,9,11,12,14
MARLBORO
9.1
8.43
<ENTER>
W
P-I K-I Ca% Mgt Mn-I Zn-I Cu-1
Field Irrigation Information
Average Soil Depth : 3.0+
Available Water Holding Capacity - 1.5 feet 2.0
Maximum Irrigation Rate - inches per hour 0.40
Maximum Amount per Irrigation Event - inches: O.96
LIMITATIONS: This program is based on the best available data.
Since many uncontrollable variables can affect plant growth
and nutrient requirements, North Carolina State University Cooperative
Extension Service is not resposible for any losses incurred from
the use of this program. The software is provided 'AS IS' and
without warranty as to performance.
Printed :10/22/1997

9
Lo

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water`Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 6, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEM REQUESTED
To alai S. _ -
Swat Hog Farm
5127 Hwy 58 N
Wilson NC 27896
Farm Number: 33 - 67
-- Dear Jolm S. Brewer:
1 •
NCDENR
Emv1RoNMrNs ANo NAruRAL REsmFtCCs
RECEIVED
WATER QUALITYSECTION
UAN 0 5 1999
Non-O+scharge Pennit6ng
You are hereby notified that Swat Hog Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has six60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
withChapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sin ly,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5W* recycled! 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment and Natural Resources WATER QUALITY SECTION
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form ,BAN 0 51999
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operaftftharge Pemnlmlls
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Swat Ho1arm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name. John S. Brewer
1.3 Mailing address: 5127 Hwy 58 N
City, State: Wilson NC Zip: 279%at IP
Telephone Number (include area code):-237-3382
1.4 County where facility is located: Ed ecombe
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
C copy o a county road map with the location of the arm identified): 5harpsburrg N 1146 cast. Crossover Old Wilson Rd..
At Ta lore X t _y_ rd. Travel Amrox._1 1/2 miles Still on 1.146, our farm path turns to the right just before Awell's Kept Farnily
Graveyard. Follow farm path approx. 1/2 to 3/4 mile to farm site.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): _rAr L.L+ 3e-
1.7 Lessee's / lntegratots name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): CA,% L;,�p Ar.,r.S
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/89
1.4 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): - k 10 N 4�
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: ^ 3 _ (county number); f 7 (facility number),
2.2 Operation Descnptton: Swine operation
-Feeder to Finish
2400- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct?"Imyes; no, If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures Were designed.
DM of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
No. of Animals
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 33 - 67

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 15.83 • Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 15.83
2.4 Number of la oon storage ponds (circle which is applicable): A
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or R
(please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NR Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
S or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? )7A 14
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CA WMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 33 - 67
Applicants Initials
SQ
S/3
53

Facility Number: 33 - 67
Facility Name: Swat Hog Farm
RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
JAN 0 5 1999
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: Non -Discharge permitting
I, �0 r%/ S rql_-! 0, v— _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for Sw AT Ling 61, r= (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and comple* to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete. 01-
Signature Date ne
5. MANAG 'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owr)
I
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed y me and is accurate and complete to the best of my now edge. 1 un erstand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 33 - 67

-J
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
LExisting or New or Expanded (Please circle one)
General Information:
Name of Farm: u G, Facilay No: 33 6 7
Owner(s) Name: ,Jfl�,� S. r[irc.+�c✓ _ Phone No: �/g,_�^3.�!j
Mailing Address: 51,.) 7 Nw s �J NG _-� 78y6
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: _ L/9C C0n AC
Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:
Latitude and Longitude: ,?S 5) ao / 71 ' y7 o o Integrator: rG"„S
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specil!c:
road names, directions, milepost, etc.): a/�
fa�c Aoc.+'.
Operation Descrjp[ion:
Type of Swine No of Animals
Type of Poultry
No of Animals Type (,f Cu:fir •; ,4nw:c:i,
{) Wea Feeder
()Layer
f)Dair.;
[ ceder to Finish yD0
()Pullets
()Bee;
() Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
Other Type of Livestock:
"Number of Anima!,
() Gilts
0 Boa rs
Expanding Operation Only. -
Previous Design Capacity:
Additional Design Capacity:
Total Design Capacin!:
Acreage Available for Application: /$. 9-5 Required Acreage, /S• $3
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: oP ��Tootal Capacity: 83 2 %oy cuh,: F.�t
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or ( La (please circle one)
H YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle onc)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I(we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
procedures cstahlished in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement thcsc
know that any expansion to the existing design capacity otthe waste treatment and storage system or constructic n of ncw f:,.!:;:i:.
new cenitication to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are smcF:u + I !wcl
must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state ei0icr
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using te; hmca!
the Natural Resources Conservation Service The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office ofthe local Sa:!
Conservation District. l (we) know that modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to tte Sr,!! :r.d ':•;:c: C:, . _.._-
District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new cenii;c^.!o^
changed) within 60 days of a tit!c transfer.
Name of Land Owner
Signature: { J'
Name of Nlana (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August I , 1997
Date: a 9 J
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commi»ion pursuar: to 13.y
NCAC 6F .0005, l certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named ahovc ha an anima .tiastc
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Man4ycment IDEA) as
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and;tjr the `orth L'aro'l:n::
Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and I.5A NCAC 6F .0001-.UO05 Thy ,'; ':iu'• .r,
elements are included in [he plan as applicable. 1,Vhile each category designa:e> a technical spc�-ialisi -,ho n:a;. _� ca:i-,
cer6ficalion (SD, Sl, WUP, RC,I) the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are tcchnicail,. or:,r•_tcn,
II. Certification of Design
A)_Collection, rStorage, Treatment 5' stem
Check the appropriate box
O Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization-cquircnr_ms.
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and panu,.
been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print)
�•r�'�H�gR001" .11
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc
Date Work Co,npl
;.tad, ' �is
Address(Agency} f3eulaville, NC 28518
Phone No:
? YH R s 5,
91 568-2420 91 658-0707
S 4062 r
Signature, —
Date: q/y�9
L
"•��°B'•ti�C11VEE '4�`;
.• yy l 1
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separation (buffers); adequate amount of land for uasfe� ttiliaatit�n. _ en ,_r. ,; i,
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc
Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Beulaville, NC 28518
Phone No:
Signature: 4/.
Date: .2/ao21y
f z V
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check appropriate box
( Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
O Facility with exterior „lots (RC)
,Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas ha%'c hcen
with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
9 drr�� - Cc.r,'
4 /'
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Beulavllle, NC 28518 Phone tio,:
919 568-2420 919
Signature; Date: /�2_ Z'q
'3yf;
AWC -- August 1. 1997- - ?

M
111. Certification of Installation
A) Collection Storage. Treatment Installation
.� �C v� LJl c .✓GN
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (Sl)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have bun instaiicd in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary. N C�P,pI'
Name of Technical Specialist Please Print :
P ( )
��c• fix
'
' 1
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc
co: A-/ /a
40o2
G ;21
Address(Agency) : BoulavillQ1 NC 28518
Phone No.:11919)568-2-426.1919)658-0707
��I..G! lV .•�Q�, ,rt�
Signature: a'A T �!P L-,
Date:
B) Land Applicadon Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box v
(The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
() Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is clured for planting; the cropping systcm a-;
specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to cstabli}hcj the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (nionthldaylyear); the proposi:d cover crop is appropr�atc Tor
compliance with the waste utilization plan.
O Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land v~iihin 30 da%s of
this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print):
Affiliation: f 9
Add ress(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: � Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in I11.B above hws been checked.
1 (we.) certify that 1 (we) have comritted to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste uti!izas ;on p:an. and
appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of complcuon from e
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date speci fed in the conditional certification. I (,,vc) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an cnr'or;z;,=nt a.uon
from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: Z/—t
Signature: Date:
Name of Manger (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC 1, 1997 a

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as spc.'i:ic.:.1 in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ��-
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Aopiication and Handling E ui ment Installation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
O . Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for usc; cakhrattr,n An,-'
adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
(} Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not kern installed but the cnvncr h:.s
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specihz:d in {hc—)ntrs;t
agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained, calibration and adjustment
/ been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
(�1 Conditional approvals Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been pur �.:.cd
and will be on site and installer! by 51//9 f _ (month/day/year); there is adcc u.yte ,mr:gr t.t
hold the waste until the equipment is inst�ecJ arid until the waste can be land applied in accordancc ;:th crti, n:n_
system contained in the plan; and calibralion and adjustment guidance have been provided to the o-.�nf--s ar.c ._
contained as part of the plan.
Nance of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address(Agency): P Box 1096, Beulaville, NC 28518-1096 Phone No.: 919-65S-0'7Q-
Signature: Date: 1a ,,2 �/9 %
The followingsignature block is only tv6e d when the box for conditional approval in 111 0 ,ibove hay hrrn chhi<ed.
l (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as spcciti--:l ;n m:.
(our) waste. management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Tcchn;ca!
Within 13 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that tailur- te,
verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject the (us) to an enforcement action trorn rJti','
Name of Ladd Owner:
Signature: Date;
Marne of Nlanageio f different froin owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD.SiAVUP,RC orl)
?Methods to control odors and 'insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mdrts:-
management systcm as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is o erational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc Date Work, Comple:L�&
Address (Agency): P 0 Box 1096 Beulavi}le, NC 285 18-1096 Phone No.: 919-65S-0 %�i-
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 5

D) Application and Handling Equipment
Check the Appropriate box . // /
CXlS7i
xisting or exp andin Facility with existing waste a lication ui ment (1A'UP or 1) 7?/,- Ca. �cJ{J 6e C�cc ,
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calihrated or evaluate] �n d::.:ru:,n_c
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the ,vaszu r:sna_cmcnt
plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area r quire-d by the plan at rates not to excccJ ithcr t
specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule- for timing of application has been cstabli>hc,J: r:yutr_! but cr,
can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
() Nrw, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste_ application equipment for spray irri -ation il)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as nezcssarn to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area rcqutrcJ 1- t'r•c pl,n At
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timinv, of appli.a',ion, ha,
been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance arc containeJ s, ri':.,t :^ -
plan . 1/
( NCw.ex ended or existin facility withou�e-xi n waste a lication ut ment for lands rcadin�cnot usirrigation. (WUP o? 1) (,,, } l��Animal waste application equipment spacthe plan has been selected to apply waste as ncccs.ar.', to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed gpplicatiori equipment can cover the area require h'• t �,11.,
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for umin w app h—,ion- h,,
heen established: required buffers can he maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are :oniaint a- r•.,rt r,, t,c
clan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
i 1 �
Affiliation: Agriinent Services Inc Date Work Completed:
Address(Agency): P O Box 1096, Beulaville, NC 285 € 8-1096 Phone No: 919-658-070 f
Signature: Date: /a1, dll 7
E) Odor Con ol, Insect Co rol. o tality Maria-vement and Emergency Action Plan (SD,S1,WUP,RC,or It
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control ChcAlirt, ar. in,c,;
Checklist, a Mortaility Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odor, ani iP• c.'t> ha,. c
been evaluated with respect to this site, and Best Management Practices to ,Minimize Odors and Bc.;t �1an�;cnren:
Practices to Control lnse4cts have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Buth the
Manant?ement Plan and the. Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be imnlemcntcd by the-,
Narne of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Affiliation: Agriment Services Inc
Date Work Completed: ,d-2/A114
Address (Agency): P 0 Sox 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518-1096
Phone No.: 919-65S-UU-
Signature:
Date: /� 2 /7
r) 1N ritten Notice of New or E, anRt t Swine Fann
The foiiowing signaturt block is only to he used for new or expanding swine farms that ht_,in con:4t:—U tth'r, :t.r lone
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
certify that I(we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all proper, c,",nc-,
who own property located across a public road, street or highway from this new or expanding swin, (ern:
was in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the pmacr::. -:,
notified is attached.
Narne of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Naive of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
I
AWC -- Auust I, 1997 3

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the .
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal W'uste Management
Plan.
ANVC -- August I. 1997

14,
H.� .-- UU
C
117 , r
of(,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, 'Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
March 22, 1999
John S. Brewer
Swat Hog Farm
5127 Hwy 58 N
Wilson NC 27896
A111'TFW;W,
C,
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330067
Swat Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear John S. Brewer:
In accordance with your application received on January 5, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to John S. Brewer, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Swat Hog Farm, located in Edgecombe County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2400 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, Norm Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS330067
Swat Hog Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
-� C,. Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 1, 1999
John S. Brewer
Swat Hog Farm
5127 Hwy 58 N
Wilson NC 27896
A.,
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS330067
Additional Information Request
Swat Hog Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear John S. Brewer:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 3, 1999:
The Waste Utilization Plan should include irrigation parameters for the each crop and field combination.
Irrigation events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum application allowable for that soil type from
the time the pumps are turned on until the time they are shut off. It is currently recommended that the total
application amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. Please have your
Technical Specialist revise your WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates
exceed the recommended one inch, please have your Technical Specialist justify the increased application
rate in the narrative of your WUP.
2. It appears that the land listed in Table 1 of the WUP is ]eased by the producer. A lease agreement between
the land owner and the producer should be included with the WUP.
3. When the Farm Manager is different from the land owner, the General Permit Application needs to be
signed by both persons. The Waste Utilization Plan Owner/Manager Agreement should also be signed by
the manager if different from the facility owner.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
scaled, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before March 3, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you ha
cc:
please call me at [phone], extension 546.
FFR 21g99 �.
Ih� i',CRLEiGEI I `�G4{t1IAL Gfi1U
Raleigh Regional Offlce, Water Quality
Permit File
Sincerely,
Susan Cauley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. John S. Brewer
5127 NC Highway 58 North
Wilson, NC Z7893
IDEIHNF;Z
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summaries and Corrective Action Recommendations for
Steve Brewer Farm Facility No. 33-66
Swat Hog Farm Facility No. 33-67
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Brewer,
On May 6, Operation Reviews were conducted of the Steve Brewer Farm, facility no. 33-66 and the Swat
Hogg Farm, facility no. 33-67. These Reviews, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, are one of two
visifs scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water
Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Reviews, it was determined that waste was notbeing discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator. Copies of the completed review forms are enclosed for
your information. The following observances, questions and management deficiencies were discovered and
noted for corrective action or response:
1. The rye crop needs to be cut as the Bermuda stand will suffer due to shading out. You stated that
tans to cut the rye were canceled due to the wet weather of the past couple of weeks. As soon as
the soil dries out sufficiently to allow traffic, harvest needs to occur.
2. The lagoon had insufficient freeboard, less than 13 inches, and needs to be pumped down. This
can be done as soon as the rye is harvested to ensure the Bermuda crop.
3. The lagoon had some eroded areas due to rainwater leaving the house roof gutters. These areas
need to be filled in and the gutter system fixed to eliminate overflows.
As you requested, I notified Sue Homewood with the Division of Water Quality that the farm was registered
twice, to keep the Swat Hog Farm registration and the new mailing address for the farm.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Lz�ofiQ`eefe
nvonmental Engineer I
cc: Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carollno 27609 N%q 1 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources E�NWik
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor A M Aft�Wd ft
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C )lil E H N F=1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 13, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Sue Homewood
SUBJECT: Notification of Facility Number Change
The following changes have been made to the Animal Operations Database. Please make
appropriate changes in your files.
Facility numbers 98-6 and 98-8 were incorrectly registered in Wilson County.
The farms are located in Edgecombe county and have been reassigned the
facilities numbers 33-66 and 33-67 respectively.
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to call me at [phone] ext 502.
FEB 141991
r�' DEHNR RALEIGH , ,,
REGIONAL OFFICE
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Jun 12 '96 14:43 P.04/05
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural ResourcesIT
A • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID FE
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
DRAFT
Mr. L. Wardlaw Lamar
Valentine, Adams & Lamar, L.L.P.
P.O. Box 847
Nashville, NC 27856
Subject: Brewer -SWAT Hog Farm
Facility Number 98-08
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Lamar:
The Division of Environmental Management has recieved your letter of May 2, 1996,
requesting infon=ttion regarding the compliance status of the subject facility. This request was
forwarded to the staff of the Water Quality Section. A review of files pertaining to this facility was
conducted and the following is offered in response.
During an April 11, 1990 inspection, Division staff observed a discharge of animal waste
from the subject facility which entered the waters of the state. The discharge of treated wastewater
is a legal activity only if the facility has obtained a N13DES permit and abides by its terms. The
subject facility did not hold a NPDES permit.
In a letter dated June 1, 1990, George Everett, then Director of the Division of
Environmental Management, designated the Brewer -SWAT Hog Operation a "concentrated aniaml
feeding operation" (CAFO) pursuant to 15A NCAC 211.0123 and 40 CFR 122,23. This letter
was received at the Brewer residence on June 15, 1990. The designation required Mr. Brewer to,
within 60 days, make such nwdifecations as necessary to his system of animal Waste management
so the discharge of animal waste was permanently eliminated. In the absence of documentation of
of the permanent elimination of the discharge, the designation required Mr. Brewer to submit an
application for a NPDES permit within the same 60 day time frame- On July 6, 1990 Mr. Brewer
requested an extension to the deadline for completing improvements to his facility. The request
was reviewed by staff of the Raleigh Regional Office, who recommended it be granted. On July
31, 1990, Director Everett extended the compliance deadline until October 15, 1990.
Our files indicate that since these incidents in 1990, the fa( .-ility has been in compliance with
applicable laws and rules. The facility was properly registered per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H
.0217 on February 23, 1993. Inspections conducted by staff of the Raleigh Regional Office in
1994 and 1995 found the facility to be in compliance with the terms of 2H .0217, although some
management deficiencies were noted which could have led to problems if they were not addresed.
1 hope this has provided sufficient response to your inquiry. Please be aware the Division
shares your concerns and those of the citizens you represent regarding the management of animal
waste. We will continue to utilize all our available resources to ensure this activity is performed in
such a way as to offer maximum protection for the environment.
pp A
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, Forth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 500/. recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jun 12 '90 14:43 P.05/05
If you have any further questions about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
Judy Gamete, Regional Water Quality Supervisor of our Raleigh Regional Office at [phone]
or Bob Sledge of our central office staff at [phone], extension 233.
Sincerely,
DRAFT
A. Preston Howard, TT., P.E.
oe: Raleigh Regional Office
FacHity File

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Jury 12 '96 14:42
1.
P. 02/05
1. T, VAUChMIJE (1987-1970)
7 U VALENTINE
FRANKUN L. AOAUS, JR.
L WARDL.AW LA)AAR
i.EWtS W_ LA "I'll JR.
�T �+ n DLAATW�OFFI�EpS� T L.L.P.
203 SOUTH BARNES STREET
NASHVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 27858 w gfAIUNO AotiRESS:
May 2,
REC
MAyu
.4 Cicirr,,s 8 199,6
Mr. A. Preston Howar , for
Division of Environmental. 9*Agement
Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
State of North Carolina
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Brewer -Swat Hog Farm
Edgecombe County, NC
Dear Mr. Howard:
P, O. BOX 047
'.".r.)y NASHVi11F NC2765G
TELEPHONE (Sig)4$9-7141
FACSIMILE (os) 459.2m
r ,��
1996
MAY �
RO���h-t�"1 P, MGTIDW Of 'ORS oFnVE
X am enclosing herewith to you copies of the following
documents:
1. Letter dated June 1, 1990 to Mr. Steve Brewer from George.
T. Everett, former director of your division.
2. Letter dated May 1.7, 1993 from Coy A. Garrett, State
Conservationist, to Ms. Deborah Van Dyken.
Apparently the letter of June 1, 1990 put certain restrictions
and requirements on this swine facility.
The letter of May 17, 1993 seems to indicate that no
assistance was sought by Brewer either by the Wilson County or
Edgecombe-_county soil conservation service units.
Could you address the issue of whether or not Mr. Brewerever
er
came into compliance with your requirements of June 1, 1990?
Mr. Brewer proposes to establish a facility.for between 6,000
and 9,600 hogs to be located on a 132 acre parcel of land in Nash
County, N. C., approximately one quarter to one-half mile west of
Strickland's Crossroads, said tract adjoining the Tar River
approximately two miles upstream from the Tar River Reservoir, the
drinking water supply for the City of Rocky Mount and several other
small municipalities.

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jun 12 '96 14:43 P.03f05
X,
Mr. A- Preston Howard, Director
Page Two
May 2, 1996
Local citizens, especially those with property adjoining the
Tar River downstream from the tract and those with homes adjoining
the Tar River Reservoir, plus officials of the City of Rocky Mount,
are greatly concerned about this proposed facility and would, of
course, like to know the track record of the proposed operator.
Your immediate response to this inquiry is requested.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and please accept
my kind regards.
Yours sincerely,
VALENTINE, ADAMS & LAMAR , L L. P.
c_.
L. Wardlaw Lamar
LWL:pw
Enclosures
cc The Honorable Tim valentine
Governor's Blue Ribbon commission
on Swine Facilities
Richard J. Rose, Esq.
Poyner & Spruill
Attorneys for the City of Rocky Mount
Randall B. Pridgen, Esq.
Mr. William Buchanan
Ms. Faye S. Bunn
11319.1et

State of North Carolina IqV
Department of Environment, LW!WA
Health and Natural -Resources 4
; *
Raleigh Regional Office woo rAi
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
ry p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secrets
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 11, 1995
John S. Brewer
Post Office Box 97
Elm City, N.C. 27882
Subject: Compliance Inspection Report
Swat Hogs Farm Operation
Secondary Road 1146
Edgecombe/Wilson County
Dear Mr. Brewer:
On July 20, 1995, Mr. Steve Mitchell, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection
of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential
problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface
waters of the state. No manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of
willfully discharging wastewater) were observed.. Some effort shoul be made to insure that the down
spouts from the rain gutter remain inside the run-off pipe to prevent this stormwater from entering the
lagoon.
Please continue to properly manage the waste and wastewater generated by this farm to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce
water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved
animal waste management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical
specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at [phone],
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: VAlsc�County Health Department
Ricky Hayes - Wilson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
RRo and Central Files
Fm
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W%recycled/ 10%past-consumer paper

--1995 15t2e FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires immediate .A rtcnrion.-
ft �L s Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT"'
OIL ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkA"l ONS SIT!✓ VISITATION RECORD
�--� DATE: Uc-�-d , 1995
[' Time: /_
Faun Nance/Owner: � tty,l V _,Z2e.t,v4�Z� �7.� I)-T—
Mailing
County -
Integrator: _ _ -- _ — — Phone:
On Site Representative: -3 ►Sty R _ Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine �c Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �°)' Number of Animals on Site: . �{
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitudes _' Longitude:" _ Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
.Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches).T r No Actual Freeboard: a. Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or (0 Was any erosion observed? Yes or No�-
Is adequate land available for spray?(M�>or No is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS ?niroitnum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? )J� or No
100 Feet from Wells? 4S) or No
.Lic anitnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes Ono
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or�
Ts animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
5irri'.ar marl -made devices? Yes orQ If yws, Please Explain.
the facility waintain adequate, waste wariagernc;rit zzcords (volumes of manure, land applied,
Spray irrigated con specific aereage with cover crop)? Yes oi(&
Additional Corrlmems:
Si
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.a2

'I-.
OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Jun 12 '96 14:42 P.01/05
WATER QUALITY SECTION
COMPLIANCE GROUP
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
TELECOPY TO: 9ei.
FAX NUMBER:
FROM: Bob Sledge
PHONE: [phone], extension 233
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING 'T'HIS SB=T:
CONQV=S: uJAray a-"U axis- �-� /'U4. /�y
{�✓✓��.C�! d' � d�. Asir+- "1a- �CsV! e rJ � i�� � 4 Ar a.y_ p���d�l of .,[wfdll4.•t d� �
i'_O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone] Z 9
An Equai Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Law Offices of ET E I E
DAVID L. ROSE
1835 K Street, N.W. JUN 1 b 1993
Suite 900
Washington, D.C. 20006-1203 DEHNR_RrL RO
Fax [phone]
David L. Rose Joshua N. Rose
[phone] [phone]
Deborah Palmer Henry
[phone]
June 11, 1993''
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT'REQUESTED
Marshall V. New
Route 4, Box 193B
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
Dear Mr. New:
i
This Firm and our local counsel, Deborah Van Dyken represent the
Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League's Alliance for a Responsible
Swine Industry chapter ("BREDL-ARSI"), Don Webb, President, Route 1 Box
70B, Stantonsburg, NC 27883.'. BREDL-ARSI has members who live near the
Brewer swine operation off S,t_ate Road 1146 in Edgecombe County, North
Carolina.
We write this letter to notify you of BREDL-ARSI's intent to sue you
for violations of the Clean Water Act, and to invite you to discuss
settlement possibilities.
Section 505(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C.
S 1365(b), requires that 60 days prior to the filing of a citizen suit in
federal district court under Section 505(a) of the Act, the alleged
violator, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the State in
which the alleged violations occur must be given notice of the alleged
violations.
s
We hereby place you on notice, pursuant to Section 505(b) of the
Act, 33 U.S.C. S 1365(b), that ewe believe that you are causing the
property you lease from Mr. Whitehurst to be used for disposal of sewage
from the Brewer swine farm, resulting in discharges into waters of the
United States that violate "an effluent standard or limitation" under
Section 505(a)(1)(A) of the Act,'33 U.S.C. S 1365(a)(1)(A).
We believe that you have arranged with Mr. Brewer and Murphy Farms,
Inc. to .discharge pollutants associated with the aforementioned swine
operation from point sources on the property you lease from
Mr. Whitehurst, including but" not limited to: suspended and dissolved
solids, dirt, rock and. sand, biological' materials and other organic
matter exerting chem ic of and biological oxygen demand in the waters,
r�

Marshall V. New
Page 2
June 11, 1993
salt, metals, sewage, solid waste, and other materials resulting in the
presence in the waters of North Carolina.of distinctly visible floating
or settleable solids, suspended solids, scum, foam, deposits of sludge
and silt, bad odors, materials harmful to aquatic life, distinctly
visible color, and other conditions altering the integrity of such
waters.
You have violated and are in violation of the prohibition in
Sections 301 and 402 of the Act. 33 U.S.C. 5 1311(a) and 1342.
Specifically, the swine operation's use of your leasehold has caused
unpermitted discharges of pollutants through point sources into unnamed
tributaries of Cokey Swamp, the Tar River and other waters of the United
States. The discharges have. occurred on a regular basis since the swine
facility commenced operation.
With this letter, we give notice of the alleged violations to the
following parties: you, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency, and the State of North Carolina.
This NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE covers all violations occurring as a
result of the use of your leasehold by you, Mr. Brewer and Murphy Farms,
Inc. since the swine operation commenced operation, and is intended to
cover all future violations arising from the continued unpermitted
discharge of pollutants from the same facility.
At the close of the 60-day'notice or shortly thereafter, we intend
to file a citizen suit under Section 505(a) of the Act against you for
the violations discussed herein.1
During the 60-day notice period, we would be willing to discuss
effective remedies for the violations noted in this letter. However, if
you wish to pursue such negotiations in the absence of litigation, you
should initiate the negotiations within the next 10 days so they may be
completed before the end of the 60-day period. We do not intend to delay
the filing of a complaint in the federal court if discussions are
continuing when the 60-day period ends.
Specifically, it is very likely that your leasehold is not overly
contaminated at this point. Simply barring future sewage disposal
coupled with some monitoring of the run-off might well solve the problem
without the need for litigation or further remedial measures.

f
Marshall V. New
Page 3
June 11, 1993
If you wish to pursue discussions -or if you have any questions about
the issues raised in this letter, please. contact Joshua Rose at the phone
number listed below.
Sincerely,
shua N. Rose
183
Suite 900
Washington D.C. 20006-1203
[phone]
Deborah Van Dyken '
121 W. Margaret Lane
Hillsborough, N.C. 27278
[phone]
Attorneys for: Blue Ridge Environmental
Defense League - Alliance
For A Clean Swine Industry Chapter
cc: Carol M. Browner, Administrator
United States Environmental
Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Patrick M. Tobin, Acting Regional Administrator
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Johnathan B. Howes, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Ken Schuster
Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department
Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
of Environment,,Health, and

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 28, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Sue Homewood
SUBJECT: Notification of Facility Number Change
`� Gv�
IDEHNR
D N T � � T
ti
JUN 21997
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
The following changes have been made to the Animal Operations Database. Please make
appropriate changes in your files.
Facility number 33-66 was a duplicate of facility number 33-67. Facility number
33-66 was deleted from the animal operations database.
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to call me at [phone] ext 502.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

,State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 28, 1997
Mr. Steve Brewer
P.O. Box 97
Elm City, North Carolina 27822
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 33-66 & 67
Swat Hog Farm
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Brewer:
On July 21, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
an by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialis•: or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely�YaA-,�
J y Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
31300 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, «' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number '
Date of Inspection
_.� Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
KR stered Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for I hr I5 min)) Spent on Review
ified ❑ Permitted or Inspection !includes travel and nrneaed..1
❑ Not O1peratitional Date Last Operated: ............... . ....... . ......
Farm Name: ..��a._! ......
Land Owner Name: _�/.1..¢F a.1�5!..1e2..................................................
Facility Conctact:... JT,QrC:....62Ato ..................... Title: ._................
....................................._....... _...................
Phone No: .... Z�% sS�L.
Phone No:
MailingAddress:P...:.k.:... ..........C(� C' {� .iC- � � 11 z Z _......._. ........_................_.....__....._........_......................_......._._............. .......................
Onsite Representative: r........./ �I .....................__., Integrator: C(Q:ry /'w', �/y � p ........._........
_.................................................................
Certified Operator:........... .... 0........................................................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm: y 2 // V 6
............................................. _................... _.............. _............... _................... _..................................................... ............................................ _........
Latitude =* =' =" Longitude =* =, ="
oenerat
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes
i
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 134 o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o /
i
❑ Yes o
Continued on back

. F'ci[ityNumbcr: Sf}r"'e r—'jj?.i.—
6. W Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes LG'Vo
<11-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes I
Structur - LIjagoa-ts and/4r_HoldLng ouds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes i� ` 0
Freeboard (ft): Structure I r Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.'.C...... ............................ ............................ ............................ ..........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? [:]Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;NO
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes
Waste Auplicatlon
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type } :C. .., ..
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWM$)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
. Id'No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
L�No
❑
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
o
20.
Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency?
❑Yes
090
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Id No
For
22.
Certified Facilides Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[:]No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'sue �a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tj,��� �- Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Routine O Corn Taint O Follow -tip of DW2 inspect ion O Follow-u t of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection " 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ® Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not OperationalOperationaU Date Last Operated:........
.........
Far.. ..
County• Farm Name: ............. ..1JJ-6.`.. Fe.� •E.1�,����...,,<°�...��.............................
OwnerName: ...................................................
... Phone No:
Facility Contact: ...... ..... Title: ...... . Phone No:
MailingAddress: ....... ............................................................................................................. ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:........) .............. ......i..l=L..i...................................... Integrator :..... CR•r........................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:............,.......
Location of Farm.
Latitude 0a=4 " Longitude ' 6 �Gf
r .. Design Current ..: E .. ; ' Design, Current : Design f,,' Curren[
Svvtne Capacity- .Population Poultry " Capacity Population Cattle Capacity�`Population .
❑ Wean to Feeder `' ❑ Layer IDDairy
F; eeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoiins "1 Holding Ponds. . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System "3
Genera
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
PNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
4No
Discharge ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If dischar.-c is observed. did it roach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
cf. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
;al4o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑Yes
ice""'
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
o
7/25/97
Continu d oi1 bock

Facility Number:� — '7
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes o
Structures (Lagoorts.11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes IVIN o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: �..t .........1.". ...1e .........................................................................................................
...................................
...0 ..........
Freeboard(ft):.....11-.1.................... ................ 6............... ................................... .................................... ....................................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes PNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes /&No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes 2Io
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes LRKo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only.
23. Does the facility fait to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[3, No. violation's or deft!ciende's'were noted, during this,visit.- Yoa.will receiire-ito,furiher
corresporidehce about this'.visit: : .............
rats �.
,ETYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9Ao
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Coo
❑ Yes 0 0
El Yes ,OONo
❑ Yes L f0
❑ Yes !❑ 0
s0FRcie /_/T
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: O11,AlA-41-14-4, -A 6fZt,11,e Date:

yr
TitiYl
reelj k -t,l� It
iI
it
24,
�t A"
. 44' P j —.1 r
ik. 1N 41�
A
A .". e .4:T
�1 ".j
41
4 1.
14
"M
f F..
I- IM
t, All
'I, F Allti u
I, Is iy
sdl,
`71
If
T
fill
rq
4:4"
AI I
14
-4 5 Y��, t�4
Vit,
lvv-, It
0!":
I o 14 ,
, ir,
vuml, 11 "'a
Al :Ilol q3
j ;
-, V.
0,A
I.
-je
l A.41tj � ;
�,
lr
p, If
AE%l . T I k
T V141
9
I.P., Aill i
'l ' Vi (V.
I
a
m
I
0