330052_PERMIT FILE_20171231

R.H. Mohesky/Clover M. Farms Summary Of Problem Facilities
Edgecombe County. Facility #33-31, James Lancaster, land Owner (R.H. Mohesky Owns
Hogs), On Apr. 10, 1992, NOV issued. Most recent inspection on: August 15, 1996,
resulted in a Compliance Letter sent on: August 16, 1995).
Edgecombe County. Facility #33-28, Leon Calhoun III, land Owner (R.H. Mohesky
Owns Hogs), Previous Inspections: January 27, 1993, October 4, 1993, October 21,
1991, March 10, 1994 (all of which found discharges to surface waters), these
observations in turned generated the following letters: CAFO Designation (January
16, 1992), NOV (January 28, 1993), NOV (March 17, 1994), Assessment of Civil
Penalties (June 8, 1993). Most recent inspection on: August 14, 1995, found
freeboard violation, inadequate acreage for spraying, and a discharge not
reaching surface waters. This generated a NOV (September 7, 1995), and a Loss of
Deemed Permitted Status Letter (September 7, 1995).
Edgecombe County. Facility #33--24, William Langley, land owner (R.H. Mohesky Owns
Hogs), Previous Inspections: March 22, 1992, April 1, 1992 (all of which found
discharges to surface waters), these generated the following letters: NOV (April
10, 1992), CAFO Designation (April 23, 1993). Most recent inspection on: August
15, 1996, found freeboard violation and a discharge to surface waters. This
generated a NOV (August 18, 1995), and a Loss of Deemd Permitted Status Letter
(September 6, 1995).
Edgecombe County. Facility #33--29, W.C. Varnell, land owner (R.H. Mohesky Owns
Hogs), No Previous Inspections. Most recent inspection on: August 15, 1995, found
a large discharge to surface waters via a manmade conveyance (ditch). This
generated a NOV and Loss of Deemed Permitted Status Letter (August 30, 1995),
Recommendation For Enforcement (August 21, 1995), and a Enforcement Action
(August 30, 1995).
Edgecombe County. Facility #33-52, Conetoe Creek Farm, R.H. Mohesky land owner,
and owner of hogs. Previous Inspection on: July 27, 1995. Follow -Up Inspection
on: August 4, 1995, found a discharge to surface waters via a manmade conveyance
(black plastic pipe). This generated a NOV and Loss of Deemed Permitteed Status
Letter (September 1, 1995), Notice of Recommendation For Enforcement (August 9,
1995), and a Enforcement Action (November 17, 1995). A more recent inspection
conducted on: November 28, 1995, found no discharge, however the pipe had not
been removed from the lagoon dike and had only been covered with sand. In
addition, it was discovered that this facility recently expanded after the
December 31, 1993 deadline without submitting a certificate for an upgraded or
expanded facility. This generated a Assessment of Civil Penalties for Failure to
Submit a Certification for Upgraded or Expanded Facility letter (November 28,
1995). Most recent inspection on Febuary 23, 1996 found no problems.
Edgecombe County. Facility #33-27, H.J. Farm (SR 1126), R.H. Mohesky land owner,
and owner of hogs. Previous Inspection on August 4, 1995, found freeboard
violations, and uncontained waste. This generated a Management Deficiency Letter
(August 14, 1995). Most Recent Inspection on: November 15, 1995, found a
discharge to surface waters. This generated a NOV, a Intent to Revoke Deemed
Permitted Status, and a Enforcement Action (November 28, 1995).
Nash County. Facility #64-67, Swift Creek Farm (US 301 Bus.), R.H. Mohesky land
owner, and owner of the hogs. Previous Inspection on: March 3, 1994 found two
discharges to surface waters. This generated a NOV (March 15, 1994) and a CAFO
Designation Letter (March 21, 1994). Most Recent Inspection on: August 22, 1995
found freeboard violations. This generated a Management Deficiency Letter
(October 6, 1995).
Wilson County. Facility #98-39, Thigpen/Saratoga Farm, R.H. Mohesky land owner,
and owner of the hogs. Most Recent Inspection On: October 10, 1995 found found
freeboard violations and a lack of irrigation equipment on -site. This generated
a Management Deficiency Notification (October 24, 1995).

12; The petitioner has a long, well -documented history of poor management
practices at both his personally owned facilities, and at his Clover M. contract
farms (Please see attatchment A). The Petitioner has not demonstrated compliance
with "'governing regulations", nor has the Petitioner demonstrated "good
stewardship".
13: There are statements made by the petitioner in the Tarboro paper, The Daily
Southerner (Please see attatchment B), which contradict the petitioner's�m
of ignorance regarding the presence of the pipe. In addition, the pipe was not
"hidden" from "shrubbery -like overgrowth". In fact, at the time of inspection,
the pipe was observed without the need for vegetative removal or any other
unreasonable effort. The pipe was visible from the lagoon dike and from across
the ditch (Please see pictures).
14: According to the Edgecombe County MRCS District Conservationist, A.B.
Whitley III, the pipe was likely not removed as there was no disturbance of the
vegetation on the lagoon dike nor was there any evidence of digging or excavation
on the dike. Further, Mr. Whitley noted (later confirmed upon inspection by Mr.
Eric Fleek, DEM), that the pipe was merely plugged with sand (please see
pictures). This cannot be considered a repair in a "workmanlike manner" as DEM
requires a pipe be either removed or permanently sealed. "Plugging" with sand is
not permanent.
15: Based on firsthand observation and photographic evidence, the DEM does not
consider this discharge a "nominal" one. In fact, at the time of the inspection,
the wastewater in the ditch was observed over a linear distance of approximately
100 or more feet and at a depth of at least 2 inches.
16: This Violation cannot be considered "unintentional" for the following
reasons:
1) The Petitioner is the President of the National Pork Producer's
Association. This is a pro -pork lobbying group intimately familiar with and
aware of regulations governing the pork industry.
2) The Petitioner has been assessed civil penalties and has been the
recipient of numerous Notices of Violations from The Division of
Environmental Management in the past (Please see attatchment A).
Consequently, the Petitioner has been previously made aware of
environmental regulations germane to swine farming
Unj-.s,t end rvr.
3) There are quotes from the Petitioner in The Daily Southerner which
directly contradict his claim of ignorance rega g the p p 's presence
(Please see attatchment B).
4) As the Petitioner's attorney, Mar. Walter L. Hinson, writes: "Mr. and
Mrs. Mohesky have been farm operators all of their adult lives. Mr. Mohesky
was raised on a dairy farm and his education and professional career have
been in agriculture". It seems likely that with this extensive agricultural
background the Petitioner should be quite knowledgebale concerning
regulations governing agriculural activities.
5) The Petitioner has signed an agreement with other prominent memebers of
the Poulty and Swine Industries proclaiming their "recognized need" for
environmentally sound animal waste management systems (Please see
attatchment C). Again, all indications are that the Petitioner had
knowledge of environmental rules and regulations governing swine
production. As a result, (and combined with the aforementioned evidnece),
this violation cannot be claimed as unintentional.

CLOVER (--"'M'*-) FARMS. Inc.
P. O. Box 215 •
September 5, 1996
Mr. Eric Fleek
Water Quality Inspector
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
3800 Barrett Dr. Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
7878 • Telephone [phone]
n
SEP I 0 1996
DEHNR RALEIGH
REGIONAL OFFICE
Reference: Clover M Farms, Inc.
Conetoe Farm
Farm 11=Q52D
mdgecom5--Go-ntp
Farm Operation Changes February 1994
Dear Mr. Fleek:
This memo will confirm our phone conference on Thursday, August 29, 1996
In the spring of 1994 Clover M Farms did not expand the Conetoe Farm #33-052
operation in animal numbers or constant live weight units.
The Conetoe Farm was purchased in 1991 and operated as a 200 sow farrow to
finish operation until the Spring of 1994 when it was changed to a 400 sow farrow
to weaner operation.
In the Spring of 1994 when the operation was changed to 400 sows farrow to
weaver the older gestation buildings were abandon and a new breeding barn was
built; nurserys were changed to farrowing and finishering was changed to sow
gestation.

page 2
September 5, 1996
Conetoe Farm #33-052
Time
Type
1991-94
Fw/Fin
1994-Pres.
Fw/Wn
4ueration Size Comparison
Constant Animal
Size Animal Units Numbgr
200 sows 283400 >2000
400 sows 173200 <800
The operation size in both animal units and animal numbers was decreased, not
expanded with the changes in 1994.
Hopefully this resolves the issue. If I can provide additional information please
don't hesitate to phone [phone]
Thanks,
cc. Joy Sherrod, Edgecomb County Soil & Waste

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 1, 1995
M E M O R A N D U M
J G1 dl G �►
To: Steve Tedder
Water,Quality Section Chief C r/
r�
Through: Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
From: Ted Cashion
Environmental Chemist
Eric Fleek
Environmental Technician
Subject: Loss of Deemed Permitted Status
C�over-M—Farms; Inc:=�Conetoe�Farm
N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
� dgecgmbe County
Registration # 033'_ 52
7��-
s 6)1
Attached is a proposed loss of deemed permitted status letter for
review. Also attached is a copy of the August 9, 1995 inspection
letter sent to R.H. Mohesky, and their August 10, 1995 response.
A pipe was found in the dam of the lagoon, discharging to a
drainage ditch leading to surface waters of the State.
We recommend that this letter be presented to the Director for
signature as soon as possible. An enforcement action for the pipe
in the dam will be forwarded to you in a few days.
If questions please call.
h:\animal\mohesky.mem

State of North Carolina
* Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Subject: LOSS OF DEEMED PERMITTED STATUS
WOO
�EHNR
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)
Clover M Farms, Inc. - N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
Animal operations in the State have been deemed permitted by the
Division of Environmental Management in accordance with Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual nondischarge
permit is not required if certain criteria are met. A major requirement to be
deemed permitted is that there must not be a discharge of ay wastewater from
the operation to the waters of the State.
During an inspection of your swine operation facility located on NC 42
north of Conetoe, on July 27, 1995 a pipe was observed in the dam of the lagoon.
A followup inspection on August 4, 1995 showed this pipe discharging to surface
waters of the State. This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and notification
that your animal operation has been found discharging wastewater to the surface
waters of the State and is therefore no longer deemed permitted as a nondischarge
facility under 15A NCAC 2H .0217. Therefore the existing wastewater treatment
system serving your animal operation is currently being operated without a permit
as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
If you wish to be reconsidered for coverage by the deemed permitted
provision of the Rule, you must: 1)immediately eliminate the discharge of
wastewater; 2)make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future
discharges; 3)send in an approved animal waste management plan by completing
the attached certification form. This form and a copy of your plan must be
returned to:
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Mohesky
Page 2
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will
collect, store, treat and land apply your animal waste to the land in an
environmentally acceptable manner. To assist you in the development of this plan
and to provide the required certification that the plan is acceptable, you should
contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation
District, the USDA Soil Conservation Service, or the North Carolina Cooperative
Extension Service.
If we have not received the requested certification within 60 days of receipt
of this letter or if there are additional discharges to the surface water, a civil
penalty of up to $10,000 may be assessed and you may be required to apply for an
individual nondischarge permit from the Division. This permit, if issued, will
contain monitoring and reporting requirements determined to be necessary by the
Division.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to
contact either Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Raleigh
Region at 919-571-4700 or Dianne Williams Wilburn at [phone], ext. 232.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: Judy Garrett
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Edgecombe County Health Department
Planning Branch
Operations Branch
h :1 animal\ mohesky. . ldp

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
R.H. MOHESKY
CLOVER M FARMS INC - CONETOE FARM
PO BOX 215
SHARPSBURG NC 27878
Dear R.H. Mohesky:
r
C
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
i ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Sf �e, �^
1utl 11 r
1f February 4, 20001
F1
Subject; Application No. AWS330052
Additional Information Request
,C1 over_M' F.arms.Inc.-.C6netoe_ Farm
Animal Waste Operation
fd- ce oin e.County,
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 5, 2000:
1. lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.) are missing for this facility. Be sure to include any site
evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
2. The irrigation parameters listed in your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) exceed current recommendations. Irrigation events are to be
listed in the WUP as the maximum application allowable for that soil type from the time the pumps are turned on until the time they
are shut off. The application events listed in your WUP appear to be out of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application
Amounts listed in this guide have not been adjusted for the application of animal waste. It is currently recommended that total
application amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. If your application rates need to be adjusted for
the application of animal waste, please have your Technical Specialist revise your WUP to reflect the appropriate application
amount per event. If the rates exceed the recommended one inch, please have your Technical Specialist justify the increased
application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
3. Operation and Maintenance Plan for the lagoons on this facility is missing.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must
be submitted on or before March 5, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR .Yoshi
Non -Di charge Permitting Unit
cc 'Raleigh Regional -Office, Water` Quality
Fern t File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

f
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: (DD) Violation of permit 15A NCAC 2H .0200
Violator:Registered Agent: N/A
(Mohesky
Address: P.O. Box 215 Address: N/A
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Regional Office: Raleigh
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation: The extent and degree of damage to the
environment is undetermined at this time. Public health will
likely be compromised if contact with the animal waste in
the waters of the State occurs. In addition, waste will likely
increase stress to downstream biota and could elevate
mortality rates. Private property damage has not b e e n
documented.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The discharge was
estimated at a minimum of 5 gallons per minute. Due to time
constraints, approximately 5 days elapsed from the time the
discharge was observed by the local NRCS agent A.B. Whitley to
the time of inspection by DEM. Mr. Mohesky's office was
informed of the inspections. However, Mr. Mohesky's staff
informed the DEM inspector that he would be out of town until
after the Thanksgiving holiday. Consequently, the discharge is
presumably still occurring. In addition -to the illegal
discharge of wastewater to surface waters of the State, it was
also observed by DEM and NRCS staff that this facility has a
manmade conveyance (4 inch white PVC pipe) in the lagoon dike.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality; The affect on surface water quality as a
result of this discharge includes excessive additions of
nutrients, pathogens, and lowered dissolved oxygen levels to
Corn Creek.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: Damage to Corn Creek is
unknown at this time. No immediate reports of dead or
distressed downstream aquatic fauna (i.e. fish, amphibians,
etc.) has been received. However, 'as a result of this point
source pollution input, Corn Creek (Class C-NSW) and the

R.H. Mohesky
Page 3
9. Mitigating circumstances: There are no circumstances
whatsoever which warranted the continuance of an illegal
discharge to surface waters of the State after it had been
brought to Mr. Mohesky's attention. Again; Mr. Mohesky's
record seems to indicate a pattern of wanton disregard towards
State Statutes and rules regarding the responsible management
and operation of animal facilities.
10. Assessment factors:
a) IWC - Unknown
b) Receiving stream: Class C-NSW
c) Damage (Yes or No)? If yes, include report from WRC.
11. Include a complete Animal Operations Inspection form.
12. Include a Loss of Deemed Permit Status letter for the
Director's signature (will be sent to violator).

OPERATIONS BRANCH WO Fax:[phone] May 7 '96 15:01 P.01/17
State of North Carolina '
' Department of Environment'
Health chd Natural Resources,:
Jcrnes40!'HL�nt, Jr., Go,vgmor r
ionotha:n 5. Howes,.5eG'etary, ;
Sleven J. Le vitas, Deputy Secretary
Division a(Ehvii6m' ental Management
} ` ; Wcrter Quaiity Section
r ' d P.O. Sox 2935
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-C'�5
FAX:[phone]
- , FAX TO:•�,
rr�-� 1 %: .}+
l-l':OM: / ItJ Y7 3�1 t� V1 '^ r�;�"� 'p-
PHONE: (419)'733�5083 `
776)
NO. OF Pr•GFS,INCLUDING THIS S4E'T'
A.A{� SS I,� Sir j `�i'� y S �IQ}�'� 4
- i
it
ok
An EQuar jrtuni y Aftirmc lion Employer

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
-
N OR n 'CARO LINA
4.
EDG•ECONJBE C0IJNTS'
May 7 ' 96 15 : 07 P. 14/17
NORTR.-Ckk6LINA. ENVIRO.- MENTAL
? MANA,G6kNT COMmIsCF
N.
IN TTIRA4,TTER OF: �`" � •' ,� ; ,"' ����G�O 4 � ��
CLO`'ER M FARMS,rNC. �< �, =, ) ' ', �•; pp eE��`���`;C3.
W��,�i`O;
�N FOR
FOR. VIOLATION OF ten;;:, i �. }� ADVCTNISTRATIVE HEARING
G.S 143-?15(e) CnNSTRUCTING'
A CONVEYANCE FOP, WI. I -FULLY,
I)1SC1-L4aGING POLLUTANTS TO
WATERS OF THE STATE
' a .' •i 1 sky,. .. f��"��;.;A
NOW COMCS the Pctiti6ner.herein, through counsel, inapt, time response to the
'Findings and I)ec:isionand tl.sse'ssriient of Civil -Penalties served on the Petitioner. by A. Preston
Howard, Jr., P.S,' Director ofthe :Division 6' Pt8nvironmental iManagement,,,and requesting a
hearing on said findiriss, conclusion, and decision, petition th&Coiniiiissft,ion pursLlit to�Chapter
150l3 of the General `Statutes of North Carolina for' an -adrnin.istrative.hearing, arid' ir, support
thereof, show the following; y;
w
1, The allegations in paragraph A oftheTih"diri&s'ofFact are admitted.`
2. The allegations in paragraph of the Findings'gf•Fact are admitted'.`,
3, The Petitioner has no'knowledge4prAielief as to the allegations in paragraph C of the
Findings of Fact, anct,-they are therefore denied.,
4. The allegations in paragraph D of the Findings of Fact are denied; As to any
discharged pollutants, if such dlscharge'occurred, it is:specifically,:denied,.that such
action was willful.
5. The Petitioner has no knowledge or belief as_to:the. allegations in paragraph, E. oftlie
Findings of Fact, and they are therefore deniei;i'-';:x,`:
6. The allegations in paragraph A ofthe Conclusions of Law are admitted..
7. The allegations in paragraph B of the Conclusions of Law are admitted.
The allegations in paragraph C of the Conclusions of Law are denied, It is
specifically denied that any conveyance was willfully constructed for the purpose of
discharge of pollutants into waters of the state.

UPEHHl10NS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] May 7 '96 15:08 P.15/17
9. The allegations in paragraph D of the Conclusions .6-fLaw are denied.
10. The allegations in paragraph E of the Conclusions of. -Law are denied.
11'.- The allegations:ipip4ragraph B.-of the ConcluGiUns of Law are denied.
by WAY OF AN AFFIRK'AtAt''•SHO' WING OF THE Petitioner and pursuant to
N,C.G:S. § t SOB-23(a), the Petitioncs alleges and says:
N r
12, The Petitioner commenced,:operation of the farm in March, 1990, The hog facility,
incki oiflg the lagoon�in;cluestion;,,was existing on the property at that time, 7'he�t
_ Petitioner.was not aware oi':the"drain pipe in question at coinincnccincnt. D,Ljring th6-,..
period since it started operation t)fithe facii]ties, the Petitioner has upgraded them
and continuously attempted to operate the farm in a manlier that complies with all 5
current governing regulations and„good stewardship.
1 y _«
13, The first awai'eriess that the P&Itionerhad of the drain pipe was when it.was brought
to its attention by�the inedia. s. Located by soMeone froth The
Departrhent of Environment, Health, and Natural Resource's office during a routine
inspection: B.ascd•on'the 4' tl c investi�ai:ion of the Petitioner, at -the time the
drain pipe was placed in,the lagoon it did•not violate•any iyoverning regui'ations. At
that time, such construction was acceptable and a.common practice..'Thc;pipe was
located in an area that was not readily accessible. It was hidd6ft by the.naiiiral
vegetation of the area including -grass and -.shrubbery -like overgrowth, Had the
Petitioner been aware of the pipe, it,-vvould have' immediately, corrected the problem,
14, The Petitioner was not•aware" of the situation•unti] Friday, ugilstr4, 1995. The
following day, on what'is-norntally a non -business day, the''ietitioner had located a
contractor, The pipe was ]inmediately removed and the lagoon was repaired in a
workmanlike mariner. It now conforms to all regulatory requirements.
15, .Any discharges were nominal at most. ,.An `inspection of the immediate area of the
..ra f-
c.sc:agc a:d geinr`• a dn ie. t ert t N.
were no resulting damages or harm to the natural resources of the State arising from
this event- Nor has the event resulted in any.darnages that 1ray-be incremental or
cumulative or that cannot be immediately observea_,�1� .
1.6. Any violation of the North Carolina General Statutes, if any occurred, was' "
unintentional and has been corrected. A review of the facts and the circumstances of
this incident together with the prompt response of the Petitioners justify a
determination that no enforcement action was justified.
17. The factors required by N.C-G.S. § 143B-292.1(b), or any combination of them, are
not supported by the occurrences during the period in question, Based on the actual
facts as partially set out herein, the Division of Environmental Management had no

UFI INrlI iUIYJ ommigL-H - wu rax:131IJ-(15-bU48 ' . May 7 '96 15:08 P. 16/17
justification for its efforts'to levy fines; penalties or"costs on the Petitioner.
18. As a result'of the actions of the Division of Environmental Management, the �
Petitioner has been, deprived, its:property; has been ordered to pay a civil penalty,
and will•thereby., 'e sirbstar�tialIy.piejudiced. . .
:.-•;.
• :i
19• Based .on its actions, the Division of Environmental Management has:
a.. Exceeded its at�th6rity,and:jurisdiction;
4.
b• Acted erroneously;
c. Failed to use proper procedure;
d. Acted arbitrarily, and capriciously; and
e. Failed to act.as:required by law,'or rule. >i
WHI=REl~QRE, the Petitionerprays` therCorninission as follows:
ii�Y,•. a ,', e � , .I, +
1_ That the findings of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management be
declared to be erroneous and all assessments of fines; penalties, and :costs be remitted.'
2. Alternatively, that the civil penalties and"costs be mitigated to,ansamount as more
reasonably supported by the facts found by this Commission.
rir'
3. That the Petitioner have such other -'and further.relief as providEd"by law and as the
Commission deems just and proper.
Date: ?f - if
14�
Attomeyfo -Clover M Fauns, 1Inc.
State Bar N0:15664
WALTER L_ HINSON, P.A.
P.O. Box 7479
Wilson, NC 27895-7479
[phone]
dov.•1'1nlp cudm.hem

OPERATIONS BRANCH -- WQ Fax:[phone] May 7 '96 '15:09 P.17/17
-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE:=,,:r
I, WalterL. Hinson, ofP. 0. Box 7479, Wilson, North Carolina, certify:
That I am, and at all times hereinafter, mentioned was, more than eighteen (18).years of
age:
That on-'"C , Imailed a copy,of the foregoing Petition
for Administrative Hearing, by depositing copies thereof in the United States mail, first class mail,
post -flue prepaid, in an envelope-addressed%as shown below.
I certify under penalty of perjury,tliat,the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated:
h` y,,Walte -Lf4insoh
°State Bar #5664 ;
'Walter L. 13inson, P.A.
j; P. Q- Box 74,79
Wilson, NC - 27995-7479
(9I9)-291-1746.
RECIPIENTS: ,
Mr. Ricliard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel1'
NCDEHNR
P.O,- Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Mr, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director f ,
State of North Carclira't
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ;
Division of Environmental Management
P-O. Box 29535 - ,
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535

SUMMARY OF CLOVER M FARMS, INC.
February 23, 1996
To: Ken Schuster
Regional Supervisor
Aj
l
From: Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Below are farms that R.H. Mohesky/Clover M Farms owns and opera s.
Farm Name County Location Farm #�
Moore Wilson SR 1501 98-37'
Thigpen/Saratoga Wilson SR 1534 98-39-
Conetoe Edgecombe Hwy 42 E 33-52-
Swift Creek Nash Hwy 301 Bus. 64-67
H.J. Edgecombe SR 1126 33-27
On 1/ IS the Conetoe Farm was found to have a pipe in the dam
that was discharging to surface waters of the State. Also, the
farm expanded after the December 31, 1993 cutoff date without the
required waste management plan prior to hogs .being placed on -site.
Enforcement actions have been prepared for both of these It
violations. A return inspection on has found ......9ige
�lL�,�Y G � T•�
On S the farm located on SR 1126, Edgecombe County, was ,cv,% ww+
found to be discharging wastewater to surface waters of the State.11,p4y_Qf-
A pipe in the dam was also observed. An enforcement action has ten"NA+6
0 d
been prepared for this violation. A return inspectiont on fcUn�16
has found........ C) cAA61').-
???The other three farms have been inspected and compliance was
observed. ????
Attached is information concerning other operations that are owned
by persons other than Mohesky, yet Mohesky "� ��e IjCJS m fiLjft o�Ap S.
Problems noted at these facilities are summarized
( [.e, URrr1a4j
We believe that the violations noted indicate a distinct pattern of
poor management at Clover M Farms. We offer this information as
evidence that considerable environmental impact may be caused by
the Clover M Farms conglomerate. Please consider this information

SUMMARY OF CLOVER M FARMS, INC.
February 8, 1996
To: Ken Schuster
Regional Supervisor
From: Judy Garrett `a
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Below are farms that R.H. Mohesky/Clover M Farms owns and operates.
Farm Name
County
Location
Farm #
Moore
Wilson
SR 1501
98-37
Thigpen/Saratoga
Wilson
SR 1534
98-39
Conetoe
Edgecombe
Hwy 42 E
33-52
Swift Creek
Nash
Hwy 301 Bus.
64-67
H.J.
Edgecombe
SR 1126
33-27
The Conetoe Farm was found to have a pipe in the dam that was
discharging to surface waters of the State. Also, the farm
expanded after the December 31, 1993 cutoff date without the
required waste management plan prior to hogs being placed on -site.
Enforcement actions have been prepared for both of these
violations.
The farm located on SR 1126, Edgecombe County, was found to be
discharging wastewater to surface waters of the State. A pipe in
the dam was also observed. An enforcement action has been prepared
for this violation.
Attached is other information concerning Mohesky operations that
are owned by persons other than Mohesky. Problems noted at these
facilities are summarized.
We believe that the violations noted indicate a distinct pattern of
poor management at Clover M Farms. We offer this information as
evidence that considerable environmental impact may be caused by
the Clover M Farms conglomerate. Please consider this information
carefully.
If you have questions concerning this information, or require
additional information, please notify us.
clover.mem

carefully.
If you have questions concerning this information, or require
additional information, please notify us.
clover2.mem

CLOVER WM FARMS, Inc.
P. O. Box 215 • Sharpsburg, North Carolina 27878 • Telephone [phone]
October 19, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
State of North Carolina
Health and Natural Resource
3800 Barrett Dr. Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject: Notice of Violation
Hog Operation - William Langley Farm
SR 1146
Edgecomb County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
It has come to my attention that there may have not been a written response to the
Notice of Violation on the here in referenced farm due to the confusion as to
owner/operator in the notification.
The following action has been completed:
1. The lagoon has been pumped and required freeboard
is being maintained.
2. Information has been forwarded to NRCS and farm plan requested.
3. The discharge in the drainage ditch observed by the inspector
is not understood and will need further explanation and
consultation before it can be addressed.
Respectfully,
R. H. Mohesky Farm Operator
Clover M Farms, nc.

SEP 01'95 10:47 N0.001 P.01
CLOVER M OHMS'INC. ID:919-977-4578
i .It
Facsimile Cover Sheet
To:
.c7f�S
Company:
tegow( -f47M kffa•t
Phoney:
/
Fax.
�J
� )fQ ' -s J 1 .
From:
R. H. Mohesky
Company:
Clover M Farms, Inc.
Phone:
919-977-7881
Fax:
91 9-977-4578
Date: o1
Pages Including this
cover page:
Comments: �/�, Uw7iA1,W.4 w c-�J- v-/ w
t�
,� 1 f-
eAO j/l�a•Y cry G C'�rl/CC,��vs ��11Z o,tin
:/o'a ct s � ��-`gip .4.14 �. t&0411 � Q
Go ie l Lip+
/ -C 16 leg d�
/l
r

CLOVER ICI FHMS, IHC
W/�
tea.
SEF 01'95 10 4IV001 P.02
ID:919-977-4578
C
361 490�
pIL lb
D
6ed //'v)
t� oo }
,Jkit6W,/d&)
►/

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 1, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg NC 27878
/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No..AWS330052
Additional Information Request
Clover MFarms Inc - Conetoe Farm
Animal Waste Operation
CEdgecombe-County..
Dear R.H. Mohesky:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by July 1, 2000.
Your animal waste management plan certification shows you have 3 lagoons at this facility with a total of 174,117 cu. ft. capacity.
In response to our request for additional information (as built or design calculations), you have submitted documentation o show
only 1083 cu yd (29, 241 cu ft) of storage available. This volume appears low for even 90-day storage. Please clearly state how
many lagoons are on your farm and show calculations for each of those lagoons that shows the storage volume in each lagoon.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before July 1, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you ha` eany- questions.regarding:this� request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
juN _ 2 2OQ6 Sin erely,
t�EIINR RAI ElGM RE
GIBAL OFFICE JR Joshi
Soil Scient" t
Non -Disc ge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
D'vision of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms Inc - Conetob Farm
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg NC 27878
Dear R.H. Mohesky:
`1-. 4 20oCDENR
o N
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF .
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 27, 2000
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330052
Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
In accordance with your application received on November 18, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to R.H. Mohesky, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm, located in Edgecombe
County; with an animal capacity of no greater than 400 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). .
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance.until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
The facility's CAWMP meets all requirements in place at the time of certification. However, it
appears that the irrigation system on site may not adequately cover all acreage listed in the Waste
Utilization Plan. The owner should address this inconsistency as soon as possible
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS330052
Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina R
Department of Environment and Natural Resources�r �! gsEp
Division of Water Quality �v _c TION
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) NOn.D/ r
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations ha�8 N,rniv/79
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: CIover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: R.H. Mohesky
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 215
City, State: Sharpsburg NC Zip: 27878
Telephone Number (include area code): 977-7881
1.4 County where facility is located: Edgecombe
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Conetoe take Hwy. 42 E. approx. 2 miles turn right in
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Clover M Farms Inc.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/90
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): it/Q AA e--
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _33 (county number); 52 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Wean
400- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? •991 yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
T e_yQ of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Tvne of Cattle No. of Animals
• Wean to Feeder • Layer • Dairy
• Feeder to Finish • Non -Layer • Beef
• Farrow to Wean (# sow) • Turkey
• Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
• Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: 444 �f ��i_ No. of Animals: IS
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 33 - 52

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 17.3 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 12.2
2.4 Number o agoons storage ponds (circle which is applicable): _
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES:k(please
(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards etc.) (Swine Only)
YES NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 11
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 9
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field Iocations where animal waste is land applied; /�i4'►L
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP far permitting purposes:
0:3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
%-!0.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
v3':3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
&-3:3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
6. '�.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
��6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
'�S i.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
v3The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
0. .9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
/3. 10 A site schematic.
11 Emergency Action Plan.
13.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
4 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
kg'3,15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
�,Xlthat may be applicable to your facility.
6 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 33 - 52

Facility Number: 33 - 52
Facility Name: Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
RECEIVED
tVATER QUALITY SECTION
NOV i n
Non -Discharge Permitting
E 7�blx (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for r g2'beS1A e, t�n (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed an t t if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as Apiop%_7
Signature Date A/ �+�".
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 33 - 52

i' 0'
�� ­­6J _7015
Producer: P,, H, ma pesky ItC. one -sae''
Location: Iwo r►,%;ies nor.-+k cc Coked-ot o� �-��, �Qs� S,•o[e
a � N.C.. 4 2. ,
/y
Telephone: • 11- 117 -7?9'!
TYP6
operation: 5wtKe
umber of .Animal Units: LA o n S o uis
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a speckfied
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to. be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.
Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can
be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
"Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan,.,
in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that
it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based
on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater.than 5 tons._.
per acre per, year.. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land
eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils or on land when the surface• is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to*surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid
drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop ,production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied•to:bare gr`Qund not more than
30 days prior to planting. Injecting the Waste',.or disking .will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems."+.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is •based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be
based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility.
Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management
commission

Amount of- Waste Produced Per Year igallonss -tons.etc. _- ....... .. .
-animals X3103gal. waste/animal/year = t z 0 2 00gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant -Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
400 - animals X S. y lbs. PAN/animal/year 2. b lbs. PAN/year. ' (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
!WJ e-4
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES -OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil_ Crop Lbs. N Acres
If No. Type Per Ac.*
9247 Grut,,
Lbs. N Month of
Utilized Application
oil
MOT
`
�W
I
Total 17, 3
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic „yield expectation -
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the.N requirements. Beginning in 1996, the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: 400es a. Cal x1r

Table.2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [.see Required Specification 2]).
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
,# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
*See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 e
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced 4 t 6 0
sus or Deficit - 6
` NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
' application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich
and will require• precautionary measures to prevent over application of
nutrients or other elements.
See attached map -showing the fields to be used.for the utilization of waste
water.

Application of Vaste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.)
3
I Zgo
OFX.«,a
o.
B Q,
F4,G..—
o. S
j. b
This table is not needed if waste is not being applied by irrigation, however a similar
table will be needed for dry ,litter or sludge.
Your facility is designed for 9 D days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 3n.5kk;-
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure .
exceed Elevation S 4. 14
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
Narrative of Operation: $ 4a--f- i�u-«�P l GvG
( Gtty s�u
Step ;. it e fcv 5$.0

REQUIRED SPECIFICATION'.
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. illegal discharges are subject
.to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues. d
2. -The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which
to'properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy of
a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application of other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used, the -soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the
field. These filter strips will be'in addition to "Buffers" required
by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393 -- Filter Strips and Standard 390
(Interim) -- Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking &fter waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the
Technical Reference -- Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to
surface waters -and in'a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control

conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of
application.
8, Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall.be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered
by solids.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crops planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil. t
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See Standard
393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from water
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be•applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -of --ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been approved
as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste
should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates provided the
application causes no runoff or'drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
.�) a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24-hour storm event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory
freeboard.
10. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon.embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).'. If,
-needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall

be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should.be kept mowed.and
accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly
for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

1 I i
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT}}'' ryry��
Name of Farm: "coy,+aet" R.14. /• e4pS
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design .capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand .that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
)waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24-
hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on --site at the farm office and
at -the office of -the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review.by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner;(Please
signature:
print)
4",
Date: 1711
Name of Manager (If different from owner:
Signature:
Technical Representative: (Please print) 13. Wei; Pe
Affiliation: PACs
Address (Agency); _ j? C1. BOX 1 fi
T4 a v ad l (l C.•
Date:
i Signature: a•s - KE'
fit/ Date: V4?-Z2 tZ

WW9 IPAGb ��
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this 30th day of March,
1997, by and between Bobby Carlisle and Earl Roberson, hereinafter
referred to as "Lessor", address P. O. Box 7, Conetoe, North Carolina, and
CLOVER M FARMS, INC. a North Carolina corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "Clover M", of Rocky Mount, Wilson County, North Carolina.
WITNESSETH:
That subject to the terms and conditions herein set out, Lessor hereby
lets and leases unto Clover M and Clover M doth accept as tenant of Lessor
certain real estate, including access road, in Edgecomb County, known as
Carlisle Roberson Farm, off Hwy. 42 East of Conetoe consisting of 20 acres,
more or less, of Pasture Land.
The terms and conditions of this Lease are as follows:
1. This Lease shall begin as of the 1st day of April 1997 and unless
sooner terminated as herein provided, shall exist and continue. At any time
during the term of this Lease either party may cancel the agreement upon
notice of b months given in writing to other party.
2. Clover M will pay $1.00 and other goods and services.
3. It is further agreed and understood that Lessor will sign an Animal
Waste Utilization Agreement as a part of this lease Agreement herein
attached as exhibit A.

• 4. Lessor shall be responsible for all ad valorem taxes on the real
property and improvements and Clover M shall be responsible for ad
valorem taxes on the livestock. Each party shall maintain adequate
insurance on its respective assets.
5. Any controversy or claim arising out of or related to this
Agreement, or any breach thereof, which cannot be resolved between the
parties within thirty (30) days following the giving of notice of such
controversy or claim by one party to the other, may be submitted by either
party to final and binding arbitration in accordance with the rules and
regulations them obtaining of the American Arbitration Association.
6. This Agreement shall be binding on the respective heirs, assignees
and other successors in interest of the parties.
IN =TESTIMONY WHEREOF, said parties have executed this contract
in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each of the parties, the day
and year first above written,
..(Corpor4te Seal)
ATTEST:
f"
Secretary
/IOWED',.IA
t� }
(SEAL)
Lessor
CLOVER M FARMS, INC.
By:
President

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, &6j-- 06i oar 9 hereby give &&WCh W arc
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
�n 0 acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
'�/4.IVhe field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
fr attached map. 41Ad'rfG Ifivd44fo.N Q
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowne�( Date 4/'
Waste Producer: Date. 149
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: A4d 1997 to 670 , f/ c.4Arec�aCJ
(ki imum of Ten Years on Cost SharZ It s ) .,',< ("0.0 Alct'- t"t-
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 10

a
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COU
, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
i
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due'
execution of the foregoing instrument. ��!L
WITNESS my hand and official seal this _ �C�C.�J day of
rYz , 19 q 7
My commission expires']_
(/ Notary Public.
(SEAL)
. Y,.
Page: 11

IS
1.

" ication
Animal Waste Management Plan Certif
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
- - . Name of Farm: R . N o%f iv S k 0 Facility No: 33 - 5
Owner(s) Natne: Phone No: Q911�), 1-2-7 - -7 ee3
Mailing Address: �_ o 7,CX 2 i S►-lA �53�r� v-►L _ �� 3 t5
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:. U 3 UZ o 1 a 3 c Sy CD 3 C.)
Latitude and Longitude: 35" �� f' 1 =° ;).5 ' c7G " County:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, Imilepost, etc.): k!w-i „Li Z CASs ;�F'.-
Qperation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
O Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
,Farrow to Wean 4 nxn
0' Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry
0 Layer
0 Pullets
No: of Animals
Type of Cattle No, of Animals
* Dairy
O Beef
Other Type of Livestock; Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 1 3 Required Acreage -.-
Number o agoons Storage -Ponds: 3 ' Total Capacity: 122, 11 7 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains.present on the farm: YES or 0 (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and".
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through -a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modificadon .must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) withirf60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner E �-
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from-owner):K4Y-
Signatu
Date: 1 �
AWC -- April 24, 1996

I t;cuiiical ��1t 1 1c1115L l.f:I L1111 ciL1Ui1
1. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Comrission
pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm
named above has an -animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications
of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the
USDA -Natural. Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and' 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical
specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only
certify parts for which they are technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collgcti6 n. StorazgiTreatment System
Check the appropriate box
❑ .; Existing facility -without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with
waste utilization requirements.
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems,
lagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and
specifications..
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �n . 1 . wL-k t7��-� Zr
Affiliation: NRC s
Address (Agency): -Y,T3. Tac , io -rA\aboRo, "c_ C)-76 +,Phone No.:
Signature: D. -/j, (.t). - - _ Date: IZ111/ 7
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The ,plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
C) #runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
O' FacilitXwithout exterior Iots {SD or WUP or RC)
-This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Eaciiity with exterior lots (RC) .
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
designed in accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): w ,
Affiliation:
Address(Agency), a 7Ar23OZZ 2, ►.x. 37�1'hone No.: 014' 6 q I- 79 ao
Signature•: Date: 1 z f 1_ q 7
AWC -- April 24, 1996

D) I' nt
Check the appropriate box
l" xi tin g -facility with existing waste applicajonequipment - (WUP or I) _ ,
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in,accordance with existing design charts and tables and is-616to=apply`waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing applicatiorrequiobnent can
cover the area required- by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has. been established;.,required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
0 N w or ex anded facilit • or existing facilily without exi tin wa te application a ui ment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
.Name of Technical Specialist (Please'Print):_ A • W k E'Tz-&Y e _
Affiliation:' NRCS
Address(Agency): o - _60A - 10 TA28oazL ..�c a� phone No.• C91 y) 6 q/7 7g� U
Signature: �► : , C� Date: IL1111.7
III. Certification of Installation
-A) Colle&m Storage, Treatment Installation
New—exp—anded or renfitted facili (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofts, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ,A a (,j k r --,--- y ,
Affiliation: RCS'
Address(Agency): R. o . r73 ie 7426v2o nrrQ,� Phone No.: C 1/�� !o y/" 7�o c)
Signature: _ 1,�) _ Date: Z iI
AWC " April 24, I996'

Check the appropriate box
U The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
C
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the
cropping system as speed in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the
owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by
(month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the waste
udlization plan.
❑ -Also check this box. if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared
land within 30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim
crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: ,
Address(Agency): P �, r3����`��---i��D TA��3U,�c' , r �i�6'� Phone No.: �gl17)
Signature: . �i= . Gu) Date: 1 2f %l�? 7
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste
utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to
DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date
specified in the conditional certification, i (we).realize that failure to submit this verification is a
violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
C} Runoff Con=li
from iLots (RC)
Facility with exteri,gr.lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
installed as.specified in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name.of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date: -
AWC -- April 24, I996 4

D) Application and Handling Ecilipmgni installation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
Mr"Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and -are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the:plan has not been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has -provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Cl Conditional approvalAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance -with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): rLe/.. �r
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): /0 TA23oRo nrr— - �� Phone No.: C911>. 6yp"79vv
Signature: _ Q 79 • C-C,) � � _ Dater 1019 7
The following signature block is'only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we), certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery;and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar_days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize, that failure to submit this verification is a violation. of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
!lure:� CJ _ _ 1 Da
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
-Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC — April-24,1996 5

TECHNICAL SPECIALIST FOR As-AAL WASTE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
rf
DESIGNATION CATEGORY
CODE
AREA OF AUTHORITY
Collection, Storage,
SD (design)
- lagoons, storage ponds, dry stacks, storage structured,
and/or Treatment
SI (installation)
composters, pushoff ramps, curbing and other similar
structures
Waste Utilization Plan
WUP
- design'and-installation-(development and
implementation) of land application plans
including crop'and acreages available to meet nutrient
budget, hydraulic and nutrient loading rates, placement
of application site buffers
- measurement of existing storage volume
--confirmation of existence and compatibility of.land
application equipment with waste utilization plan
- certification of cropping systems
I
- confirmation of absence of exterior lots
- confirmation of sludge and effluent removal and
application at agronomic rates for lagoon closure
Runoff Controls
RC
- design and installation of filter strips, grass
channels, and related burps used to reduce runoff from
exterior Iota (primarily dairy operations)
Irrigation Equipment
I
- design and installation of irrigation systems to
•include pipe size, pump horsepower, nozzle size, system
layout, thrust blocks, etc. and operation plan to meet
criteria of Waste Utilization Plan (hours per set, etc.)
Technical Specialists are designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F.0005.
• 5
Technical Specialists should only certify parts of a plan for which they are technically competent.

_.VA
ern'.
\
I
\
Cem rr 6.0
\
i
it 9
Af
�.
\
\
1 !!'
mf
•.'� \ `1_wim _..i'a
(_ ` ,/S
III
.,�
�76
•II
\•-
• "
II
t':• Cem
�
A
tB0
\ \
If
\ \
\
,\ 5
O 4
rf
�1
♦ I
♦ \ I
�
/f
4
'e
f6
r �1�
l525�i^
14
I
_
LJJIy>� { V
I Sx
rlBp II
I
Cem;,_
• fl
— if, n
N Ir
I;
tit
I
..
Cem•:•
.l
14.5
/�•
y
V i
it
n
1 C
M-------------------
1410
Cy
4032
114032
•+�'
\ `�•`.p�
'``
,9
.1� // .fir
/
I ♦
f .
.11
L=
SEA8000
II
� I �3
1Cem N
w
f ~
17
; ✓ �,
\ .� Cem
•�a�
•
.
♦.
14170
It
tss
rH
:Cem
._'.___..__
L {I4])
- -----^----•--•
t
as ` ,
,�
�
•----• --
j
_.Cern-._ .
__- Cem
r

w
Wxw Vt
2
W

4,4
ivy

Emergency Action Plan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operations are leaking, overflowing, or
• running off the site. You,should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to
consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This
plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and breaks can happen at any
time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow-
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping: contractor
• mike' sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
immediately stop waste application
,- • create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
- ' • incorporate waste, to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system:
• pipes and sprinklers:
OO stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
OO close. valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
• flush system, houses, solids separators:
© stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
© make sure no siphon effect has been created
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks:
• dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back
�- ;, into the lagoon

• if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals
and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
• other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, Iagoon problems require the
consultation of an individual experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: [phone] ; after
hours, emergency number: [phone]. Your phone call should include: your name,
facility, telephone number, the details of the incident, the exact location of the facility,
and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions, what
corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
641-7843
c) Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 6 417 5 7 3
d) Contact CES: 641-7815
local NRCS office: 641-7900
and your integrator:
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
a) Brock Equip.
b)
c) Clover M Service, Inc.
235-4111
977-2467

6) Contact dirt moving and/or heavy equipment companies:
a) w C.Varnell
977-3467
h) Tri-County Backhoe 446-3083
c) Clover M Services, Inc. 977-2467

_ r �
e0N,C -6 -L--
` Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cuusc BMPs N Collll•ul Insect$ Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systenss
1'111sit tlllucts Accntnulalion of solids JK Flush system is designed anti operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
Cutlers as designed.
Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
I.itguuns and flits a Cnlsted Solids Maintain lagoons. settling; basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to ntinitnice Iltc
entsting of solids to a depth of no more than b -
a inches over more than 30% of surface. '
Excessive Vegetative a Decuying, vegetation Maintain vegetative control along hanks of T
d iru.vlh lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
_ my Systems
I excel Spillage Design, ulcerate and maintain fecal systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 clay interval
during winter).
geed S1,11 a ;e Accumulations of fret! residues 1K Reduce moisture accunurlation within and
around iuttnediate perimeter of Iced storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or;irovidiug adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin fttr brewers grain an(l similar IaiLla
lttoisture grain products).
inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around fecal swrage as
nettled.
,.
AN -Ur - Novcnther 11, 1996, Page: I

Source
Animal holding Ards
Cause
Accumulations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
IZMPs to Control Insects.
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
lif Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break tip accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry blantire l landling Accumulations of animal wastes 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Sy�t�tus �( day interval during summer, 1 S-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
0 Inspect for and remove nr break tip accunnilatcd
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
` manure handling areas as needed.
Site Specific Practices
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh. NC. 27675-7613.
AN-11C - Nuveutlier 11. 1996. ,Page 2

Source - Cause BMPs toUnimize Odor Silc Specific Practices
Standing water around 6 Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto & Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
Public roads Prom farm
access
Additional Information : Avxilah[e From :
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 RuleI11IMP Packet NCSU, County lxtension Carter
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; RBAR Fact Sheet NCSU - BAI:
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recllarge- lagoon Treatment ; EBAC 128-88 NCSIJ - BAE
Swine Production facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAR 129-88 NCSIJ - BAE
Lagoon Design anti Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage, EBAR 103-83 NCSU - IIAI:
Calibration of Manure anti Wastewater Application Equipment ; CBAE fact Shed NCSIJ - IIAI.1
Cowrollinb Odors from Swint: Buildings ; PI11-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NI'PC Manual NC Pork Producers Assnc
Opflons Iitr Mlanaging Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSIJ Atari ConimunicaIions
Nttisitnct: Cimcums in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Plies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
,
ANIO(' - 14tovc1libut' It, 1996, Pauc 5

S11111'ce Catase RMPs to Minimize Odor Si1c.Specific Practices
Litt sta[iuns 0 Agitation during sump tank Sump tank covers
tilling and drawdown
lend of drainpilies a[ a Agitation during, wastewater Extend discharge point of pipes rni lerneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon siarl'aces a volatile gas emissions; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures,
• Agitation Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Minimum agitation while pumping;
Mechanical aeration;
Proven biological additives
irrigatiun sprinkler & I Iigh pressure agitation; Irrigate on airy days with little or no wind;
nutcics a Wind drift Jtif Minimum recommended operating procedure;
Rump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
X Pump front second -stage lagoon _ \ ILLX G
[lead birds Carcass decomposition AT Proper disposition of carcasses
flt:,ul hind diSpos,il pits • Carcass decomposition Complete coveritig of carcasses in burial pits;
Proper location/construction of disposal pits;
Disposal pit covers tight fitting
5tandint; water ;u nund • Improper drainage; Grade ami I:usdse:IPC such 11tat water (trains
1136116tn. 0 Microbial dcconipositioll of away Irotn Iiacilitics
organic matter
NWd trat:kt:d onto public • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
rt1,L& Irtuo I.I1-01 access
Additional InfOrmatit,n : _ _ _ _ Available Fruln
Poulin)• Mainve Managenieut ; U200 Rnic/l3MP Packet T NCSI1. Comity t:xlension Cumcr
l'uulny I.;ayer I'raduc:tion facility Manure Management: high Rise, Deep Pit ; EBAE 131-88 N('SkI - 13A1:
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: Ilndercage Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; FBAH 130.1i8 NCSI I - 11AI;
t.agnttlt Design and Management fur Livestock M-annre Treallnc111 and Storage ; izflAl: 103-83 NC-SU - IIAI:
Calibration of lvlanure :and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAL tact Sheet NCSI I - IIA1;
11rtiper i)is1111sai art Dead Poultry ; IIS&T Guide No. 19 NCSI I - 11utiltry Science
Nuis:mcc Cmicerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and l lies ; 11110107, 1995 Coorcrenee Proceedings Florida Cooperative Fxacnsion
AKIOC. - Novenlhcr 11, 1996. fate 7

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three, feet beneath .the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 3Q01ect from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering giant licensed under G.S. 'I06-I68.? '
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
f
J�
December 18, 1996

C
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.
1 z
o
Aa*.uj�a F..ea,-
o.
A
S a
Fwe-
o. S
This table is not needed if waste is not being applied by irrigation, however a similar
table will be needed for dry litter or sludge.
Your facility is designed for 10 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 3.Wft kx
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
exceed Elevation 54, 4
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
� P Glev s k.Y
Narrative of Operation: $ 4Q�f ca+r. j GvG L
S �-*p

27, 2000 9:39 AM Margaret $, Knight 2526417902 p•02
Technical Specialist Cer-tifiPL,�tion
cis a technical specialist _.,ignated by the North Carolina Soil ana.Water Conservatit + Commission
-ou:-sualt to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal v.aste management syster for the farm
.., atrcd above has an animal waste management plan that meets: or exceeds standards ane specifications
of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as spr.:cified in 15A NCAC 2F 0217 and the
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina S it and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .00 1-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designa z a technical
s^rcialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC: I), the technical speciab t should orly
Y.trts for Which they are technically competent.
C rtiffcation of Design
A)!CQI'egiion-SLQrap-e.']:Cgatmgnt Syst m
Check the appropriate box
0 LxiSjng faci lily_ without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity, stop: ge capability consistent v th
waste utilization requirements.
New, expanded -or retry facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collectio systems,
!agcons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards nd
��^�til"icar?ons.
tt: 0, ., cif Technical Specialist (Please Print): w _`+TU-q , �r
NRCS
..:,(Agency): Q.b $aX to TA23c, tis` G Phone No N4, GqI-" qc
Sig nature:, Date:��—
B) Land Aj2nlicatigB Sy e (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of la
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loE
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): -3• IA*AW
Ad' drtssU
Signature
Zff Controls-fpoMExAerior Lots
Check the appropriate box
l9" Facility withoat exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior Iots.
d for waste
ing rates.
acility with exterior Iotg (RC)
Y-fn±,vds to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas t ve been
_.-�4-ned in accordance with technical standards develop:.d by NRCS.
o. Technical Specialist (Please Print):
;Agency): A P. v , Sax to T,4 23o a max. Phone No. (�Il �t 6 q I " 9 �o
Signature:.. — - a_��. Date: z ,� q y _
A W C -- April 24,1996

CLOVER M SERVICES, Inc.
P. O. Box 215 • Sharpsburg, North Carolina 27878 • Telephone [phone]
July 28, 2000
Certified Mail #7090 3400 0003 7880 9236:�
Mr. JR Joshi - 7� v
Soil Scientist '� G t%
.Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2 -1 ` Ir'
7699 b 17 ,_
Subject: Application No. AWS330052
Additional Information Request
Clover M Farms Inc.-Conetoe Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Joshi:
Please find the addition information requested in you June 1, 2000
letter attached:
Lagoon # 1 - 32,702 cu. ft.
Lagoon #2 - 67,180 cu. ft.
Lagoon #3 - 74,736 cu. ft.
Total capacity 174,618 cu. ft.
If you need additional information please call me at 252-977-7881.
Sincerel
qC H. Mohesky

Ll r 1
THIS DESIC:!J IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME a -----a--- ;s-m------ram--> CLOVER FARMS#L1
COUNTY EDGECOMBE COUNTY
TODAYS DATE MAY 21, 1997
DISTANCE TO NEAREST
NONFARM' RESIDENCE =>
900+ FEET
NUMBER OF PIGS
WEANLING TO FEEDER =____>
0
NUMBER OF PIGS
FEEDER TO FINISH --== >
0
NUMBER OF SOWS
FARROW TO W1ANLING =____>
400
NUMBER OF SOWS
FARROW TO FEEDER =c==_ =>
0
NUMBER OF SOWS
FARROW TO F3.I4ISH=_-__=>
0
DEGREE OF ODOR
CONTROL =_='==__-_____=>
1.0
(minimum 1.0
cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
(maximum 3.0
cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE kiCCUMULATION >
0.0 YEARS
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER .LEVEL azraara>
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =­aa-aaa>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION ==:._=--========>
Depth of Permanent Water 5.0
(minimum depth without slucige = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge a feet)
SIDE SLOPES raa->
Permanent Volume Required 173200.0
Permanent Volume Provided 32702.4
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA It. SQUARE FEET>
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADD11D DAILY ====>
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAP( RATION
25YRJ 24HR STORM RAINFALL
FREEBOARD-----------------
ESTIMATED TOIL OF DAM ELEVATION
Temporary Storage Volume 0.0
129.6
FEET
50.0
FEET
47.5
FEET
47.0
FEET
41.5
FEET
Peet
1.0 i 1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 DAYS
0 GALLONS
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
2.0 FEET
49.5 FEET
cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 49.5 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length - 133.6 feet Wic:th - 54.0 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation =
Stop pumping Elevation =
Volume To Be Pumped a
0.0 cubic feet
-d 2nR1.1692q2 j42ZuN -S Jaje2jew e11 :6❑ 00 ❑E unC

Z. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGH'
0 head weanling to E,.,eder x 30 lbs. a 0 lbs
0 head feeder to finishing x 135 lbs. 0 lbs
400 sows farrow to weaning x 433 lbs. = 173200 lbs
0 sows farrow to fee-:ler x 522 lbs. = 0 lbs
0 sows farrow to finish x 1417 lbs. = 0 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE JIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) 173200 The
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates it the rate of 0.'080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge accinulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME .)F LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume - (SSI.-J * Resign factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 173200.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID L14EL
Maintain normal lag:)on liquid level at elevation 47.5 feet
Construct lagoon bul.tom elevation 41.5 feet
Lagoon size for nornal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/E:'1D2 SS/SIDEI SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
1.0 L.0 1.0 1.0 6.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH
.129.6 F0.0 6480.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb -
117.6 :3.0 4468.8 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) _
123.6 �:4.0 5438.4 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = (AREA TOY, + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
641:17.0 21753.6 4468.8 1.000
VOLUME OF LAGOON A'. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVF 32702.4 CU. FT.
VOLUME HEEDED = 173200.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENKONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 1::9.6 FEET LONG BY 50.0 FEET WIDE
a'd 206L1b9252 142TUN •5 -Za.ae2usw 921;60 oo of un['

5. DIKE
Place spoil as a co.itinuous dike to elevation 49.5 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUI'i:ED
DRAINAGE AREA!
Lagoon (tap of dike,
Lenyth Wi,;th
133.6 5-.0 7214 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 7214 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 0 days.
6A. Volume of waste proluced
Volume » 173,00 SSLW * 0.0101481 gallon/lb. SSLW/day
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume o 1.0 cubic feet
65. Volume of wash wate:-
This is the amount )f fresh water used for washing tloors or
volume fresh water ised for a flush system. Flush systems that
recycle the lagoon later are accounted for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 0 days in the pumping
cycle diviled by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 1.0 cubic teet
6C. volume of rainfall to excess of evaporation
Use period of time ,then rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) = 0.0 inches
Volume = ).0 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = ).0 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year 24 hour storm
Volume = J.0 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume - 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMI::)RARY STORAGE
CA.
0.0
cubic
feet
0.0
cubic
feet
E: ^.
0.0
cubic
feet
E:0
0.0
cubic
feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 0.0 cubic feet
E -d 20SL[IP92SE -zu%tu>j •S -46je2jew e21;60 00 OE unc

7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIR;;D (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Vo:.ume of temporary storage divided by su::-face
area of la;loon.
Depth required = 0 cu.ft. / 6480 sq. ft.
Depth required = 0.0 feet
Normal lagoon liquid. elevation a 47.5 feet
Depth required = 0.0 feet
Freeboard = 2.0 feet
Top of Dam - 49.5 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF 7AE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 49.5
ARE 131.6 FEET BY 54.0 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVA''ION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUTE
+A. 0.0 cubic feet
;8. 0.0 cubic feel:
�C. 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 0.0 cubic feet
Depth required = Vol.ume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of laijoon at normal water level.
Depth required = 0.0 cu.ft. / 6480.0 sq. ft.
Depth required = 0.0 feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
b-al E06L.It92SE 4421u71 -S Jeje2uew eZj:60 00 D£ unr

THIS DESIGN: IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME CLOVER PARMS#L2
COUNTYEDGECOMBE COUNTY
TODAYS
DATE
MAY 21, 1997
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE =>
900+ FEET
NUMBER
OF PIGS WEAKLING TO :''EEDER ===__>
0
NUMBER
OF PIGS FEEDER TO FI lISH
0
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO WE"INLING
400
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FE':.'DER====_=->
0
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FI�fISH = ==___>
0
DEGREE
OF ODOR CONTROL,
1.0
(minimum 1.0 cu. ft. per 1b SSLW)
(maximum 3.0 cu. ft. per 1b SSLW)
NUMBER
OF YEARS OF SLUDGE AL'.CUMULATION >
0.0 YEARS
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WAFER BEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER L':VEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATICI===mm=s ==>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent hater 610
(minimum depth without stud:ie = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge 8 feed.)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 173200.0
Permanent Volume Provided 67180.8
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN' SQUARE FEET>
(i.e. pumpout pond & other )utside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE r — ­� ----_---->
CALLOUS OF FRESH WATER ADDS) DAILY ==w=>
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPG;6kT1ON
2 5 YR j 2 4HR STORM RAINFALL
FREEBOARD=__------�_-_____,
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVA11ON
Temporary Storage Volume 0.0
260.2
FEET
50.0
FEET
47.5
FEET
47.0
FEET
41.5
FEET
heat
1.0:1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 DAYS
0 GALLONS
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
2.0 FEET
49.5 FEET
cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 49.5 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 264.2 feet Wie0:h - 54.0 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation =
Stop Puznping Elevation =
Volume To Be Pumped m
S-d 006L T*9252 3H2cuN •S ja4e9uew e2I;so an aE unr

1.
STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGH'.I
'
0 head weanling to f4:.edk:. -x 30 lbs.
0 lbs
0 head feeder to fin.;shing x 135 lbs. =
0 lbs
400 sows farrow to wea:ling x 433 lbs. =
173200 lbs
0 sows farrow to feet`er x 522 lbs. =
0 lbs
0 sows farrow to fin'sh x 1417 lbs. -
0 lbs
TOTAL STEADY'STATE .LIVE WEIGHT (SOLW) a
173200 lbs
2.
SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates .;t the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per
year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge acc-..mulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3.
REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME :1F LAGOON
Design for .0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume - (SSLI" * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 173200.0 cubic feet
4.
NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LE -,EL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation
47.5 feet
Construct lagoon bo .torsi elevation 41.5 feet
Lagoon size for nor:ial lagoon liquid volume using
prismodial formula
S5/END1 SS/E1JD2 SS/5IDE1 SS/SIDE2
DEPTH
1.0 1-0 1.0 1.0
6.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH -
260.2 5:1.0 13010.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb -
248.2 31.0 9431.6 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) _
254.2 41.0 11184.8 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. _ (AREA TOE' + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
1303A.0 44739.2 9431.6 1.000
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVE 67180.8 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED - 173200.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSX)NS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 260- 2 FEET LONG BY 50.0 FEET WIDE
9-d 2D6LT*92G2 g491u>J •S Jeje2aew eRIs60 00 DE unC

L3-7
7.
8.
DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRE,:) (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Vol.:me`ot temporary storage divided by surface
area of lac .)On.
Depth required - 0 cu.ft. / 13010 sq. ft.
Depth required = 0.0 feet
Normal lagoon liquid elevation - 47.5 feet
Depth required = 0.0 feet
Freeboard = 2.0 feet
Top of Dam = 49.5 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF Tl:.E INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 49.5
ARE 26j1.2 FEET BY 54.0 FEET
SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVAr`ION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUT� E
+.A. 0.0 cubic feet
0.0 cubic feet
1:C. 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME 0.0 cubic feet
Depth required = Vo"ume of pumped storage divided by surf"ice
area of lac.00n at normal water level.
Depth required - 0.0 cu.ft. / 13010.0 sq. ft.
Depth required 0.0 feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
L•d
20SLItsasE JN21u)j •S ga,ae2uew e61:60 ❑❑ ❑E unc

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME __-__--____-----=- >
COUNTY =••_— :�===aaaeaoaaagcse: :-==s==�sv=��
TODAYS DATE
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RFSTDENCE =>
NUMBER OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FIt:ISH---==->
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WERNLING
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
DEGREE OF ODOR CONTROL
(minimum 1.0 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
(maximum 3.0 cu. ft. per lb SSLW),
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
CLOVER NEW LAGOON NO. 3
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
MAY 21, 1997
900+ FEET
0
0
400
0
0
1.0
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER T.EVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER L VEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATIOY ----mom->
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE E:'s.EVATYON =�_>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 6.0
(minimum depth without sludi:.-e = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES --== =T=-=aaaa:::===========>
Permanent Volume Required 173200.0
Permanent Volume Provided 74736.0
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET>
(i.e. pumpout pond & other ::-utside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDE::i DAILY
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPO:iATION _=>
25YRJ24HR STORM RAINFALL >
FREEBOARD
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVAT'::ON
Temporary Storage Volume 70872.3
0.0 YEARS
270.0
FEET
67.0
FEET
52.0
FEET
52.0
FEET
46.0
FEET
feet
�3
1,A9�D b �w
3.0:1
cubic feet �Q,400rtl 34-70,MQ-4-
cubic feet (.a9cen ,� (07� leg �'+'�•
174,4 75,1 C.1 •�� , To{n (
21070 SQUARE FEET
90 DAYS SlxrQ"A, Qrec�.
0 GALLONS 04 Lagoon I �Z
5.2 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
1.0 FEET
56.9 FEET
cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 56.9 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Darn
Length = 299.4 feet Wid::h - 96.4 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation = 5.4.4 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 52.0 feet
Volume To Be Pumped = 42993.5 cubic feet
a.rt lye ' d !,s.;,j. 4 r �eWpw&My,%r-4fe b wi h0v� a. 4,0
irrin.,y &wd
1 4,7- ha, �, began, 1a.4 'in,0 +kQ, r1e�,) L a.9 o &?i -4-� 3,
8.d 206LItF92SE •S JaJa2..+ew ebI Z6❑ 00 0E unr

�J
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
head
weanling
to fe: tder
x 30 lbs. -
0
lbs
0
head
feeder
to
finishing
x 135 lbs. a
0
lbs
400
sows
farrow
to
wears:ling
x 433 lbs. =
173200
lbs
0
sows
farrow
to
feed::r x
522 lbs. -
0
lbs
0
saws
farrow
to
f.inj,h x
1417 lbs. -
0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGIIT (S ,LW) - 173200 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates t:.t the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME C F LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume - (SSL1,, * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 173200.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LE'»EL
Maintain normal lag. -:.on liquid level at elevation 52.0 feet
Construct lagoon bo,c.tom elevation 46.0 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/ENDl SS/EI�02 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
3.0 .0 3.0 3.0 6.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH -
270.0 6';1.0 18090.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
234.0 3:..0 7254.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) _
252.0 4!:1.0 12348.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
18090.0 49392.0 7254.0 1.000
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL .LAGOON LIQUID LEVE 74736.0 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 173200.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSI".)NS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 27:).0 FEET LONG BY 67.0 FEET WIDE
6-d 206Git,9252 I421UN •S 18je2jVW , WST:60 an DE unr

5. DIKE
Place spoil as a cor-:,inuous dike to elevation 56.9 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA!
Lagoon (top of dike;
Length * width
299.4 9r,.4 28862 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
21070 square feet
TOTAL DA 49932 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 90 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume — 173:r00 SSLW * 0.01014B1 gallon/lb. SSLW/day
in the puml;:ing cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 2114::.2 cubic feet
65. Volume of wash water.
This is the amount :.,f fresh water used for washing floors or
volume fresh water i..sed for a flush system. Flush systems that
recycle the lagoon ;eater are accounted for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 90 days in the pumping
cycle divi;:led by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = .1.0 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall :n excess of evaporation
Use period of time %Then rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (chi :'ference) 5.2 inches
Volume = !;.2 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 2184!1.3 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume .:1.7 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume 27 87 Y . 8 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
EA. 21148.2 cubic feet
0.0 cubic feet
E;.. 21845.3 cubic feet
E.). 27878.8 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 70872.3 cubic feet
01 - d 206L T *92S2 142 t ux ' S ga,ae2.,reW ecji : S0 Q0 Ue unC

7.
S.
y
DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRE(:, (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Vol%:me of temporary storage divided by surface
area of lagl..on.
Depth required = 70872 cu.ft. / 18090 sq. ft.
Depth required = 3.9 feet
Normal lagoon liquid elevation - 52.0 foot
Depth required = 3.9 feet
Freeboard - 1.0 feet
Top of Dam -- 56.9 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF TH:s INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 56.9
ARE 299.4 FEET BY 96.4 FEET
SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUM:3
f-A. 21148.2 cubic feet
El:3. 0.0 cubic feet
6:11- 21845.3 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 42993.5 cubic feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of lac:oon at normal water level.
Depth required - 42993.5 cu.ft. / 18090.0 sq. ft.
Depth required = 2.4 feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
[i d R06LTb9�5Z z421UN •S 16ue2uew e91:60 00 OE un0

Non -Discharge Permitting
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.
AAA
1 2.
go
3,01,UAM ?FacdV-
D. 4
Af
A
B q
Fe. t e- .c
This table is not needed if waste is not being applied by irrigation, however a similar
table will be needed for dry litter or sludge.
Your facility is designed for 50 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 3Mfti-kr
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
exceed Elevation S 4, L1
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
Narrative of operation: F,,*,p l Gve- l
L. lf elea 5x.o
S �-�p

Application of Waste by irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.
j
A
OK at da
o
9a K U4061 pFAcaC
v.
1
A
S a
FeiC-
o ..5
This table is not needed if waste is not being applied by irrigation, however a similar
table will be needed for dry litter or sludge.
Your facility is designed for . 9 D days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every fty-ki _
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure .
exceed Elevation S4.4.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
� p L
Narrative of_ operation: $ 4a., �.«• I GvG CIe0 s c q
S �-�p

.............
FEW Tit

MOHESKY (CLOVER FAR"
Swine Operation
400 SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
Edgeconbe County, North Carolina
Class III
Designed • Date: 2—�2?
01--)
Reviewed: Date:
Approved: CC•f.C' t t Date: .3—z 2-
Approved: Date:

PRODUCER: MOHESKY
N/AO 1. obtain required permits (026, 401, 404, dam safety, etc.)
2. Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34) -
a. Geodetic map showing lagoon location, distance to nearest
residence, and breach route.
3. Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG--538) -
a. Investigation made by Soil Scientist and/or Engineer with
backhoe on Class III or IV lagoons, as well as other
questionable sites. Investigation to be coordinated with
State Engineer's office on Class V lagoons.
b. Pits 1.0' - 2.0' below designed bottom of lagoon
C. Seasonal and permanent high water table depths recorded
4. Grid Sheet -
a. Location and dimensions of lagoon and buildings
b. Location and elevation of soil pits
C. Surface water removal (diversions, pipe outlets, etc.)
d. North arrow
e. Bar scale
f. Paydirt program must have a scale of 1"=50' or less
5. Storage Volumes (prelude spreadsheet) -
a. Designed volume exceeds needs
b. All temporary storage stored above seasonal high water table
C. Minimum 6 ft. depth and 1.cu. ft. per pound of steady state
live weight for treatment volume.
Q' 6. Excavation and Fill Calculations (include building pad fill)
7.
Lagoon Summary Sheet & Typical
Cross -Section (area form)
8.
Construction Specifications (area
form)
BYFO 9.
Waste Management flan (area form)
a. Soil survey sheets showing
all fields and suitability of
crops
b. Signatures of producer and
person preparing plan
C. Agreement sheet signed by
adjoining landowner (if needed)
d. Include attachment "B" on
sampling procedure
&--10.
Transfer Pump and Sump Design
(if needed)
[i_-11.
operation and Maintenance Plan
(area form)
Designed by:
Date:
Approved by: Date:

scs- (mc. "38 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
K. , 5- 70 30(L CONSERVATION SCF?VICt
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARhiER*S NAME DISMCT
DATE 12 , Z '_- Z 0 UlTry
S. C. S. PHOTO SKEET NO. WORK UNTT
WATERSHED AREA KEASURIMLYM
cRoPLki,m—ACRFZ PASTURE —ACRES
— . - A-6
WOODLAND— ACRES TOTAL —ACRES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSER ATIONIST
SKZ-XH OF PROPOSED . POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale V'.
feet)
�. I., cc pajmf." crnl� tin. ot dam and ld�fifv errjk,fcA. —
e L AZ BORING NUMBERANDPROFILE
SHOW dam -jiff and =111fj 6o4fh nas Tt - th— ponded arw andbomnp-i A&jawl, wifA Perrical rwd Une-
DEFrH I (Ca finwcd on back wAnomm&ar$0 SAa uvt" la6le cfrvafiomj on dum-sjte borin$m
WWI=
Min!
-01MIUMIN
!�!,®1'!llt�.lily'!1!I!I!1'!!!�!1lll;��ll�®I!
WIM]
-I=
!�!LNow,!
IN -,Elm
L13ORD;CS XA-DE By SIGNATUM & T=

MOHESKY (CLOVER FARM)
COMPUTATIONS FOR EARTH FILL FOR DIKE:
811 FEET OF DIKE AT A AVERAGE HEIGHT OF 8 FEET
220755 cu. ft. \ 27 = 8176 cu. yds.
Add 20 percent for compaction = 1635 cu. yds.
Total earth_ fill needed for dike 9811 cu.-Yds.
EARTH FILL FOR CLAY LINER:
Based on the inside dimension of lagoon:
qi�a�ctioftand
this figure includes a 25% increase for
loss.

FA
Farm Name: MOHESKY (CLOVER FARM)
COUNTY: EDGECOMBE Date: May 22, 1997
PRISMODIAL FORMULA
Length = 252 Width = 49
Depth = 3 Side Slope(ft/ft)= 3
Volume in Cubic Yards = 1083.00 0069,s 40-7 ! ��.%d�, dLa-r eia +'-r
�ar G�o--y � �Y1Q-Y'•
Top = 12348 sq. ft.
Mid = 9720 sq. ft.
243 lin. ft. X 40 lin. ft.
Bottom = 7254 sq. ft.
234 lin. ft. X 31 lin. ft.
Prepared By: CLAUDE LONG

SCS AREA-4
LAGOON SUMMARY SHEET & TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
-rup Width 1
3
Settled top of dam:-� S7. Constr Uct top of darn
Fill Yardage: 1? 911 04 4
-�- C(a.� n e.r
o t 1 � 41a 3 g� �
3 r 1
3
NEztUral ground elev.
___------------------------- --___ --_
CLIt Off seal
��Depth deter ini.nd by
Depends', on ey�.ti 17r�7ent �•�� `;)C5 can psi to
Start land application Stop land application
elev. elel).
Temporary Volume
— -- -__ _-__-------------------------. ............
Sant
support— Treatment Volume
f !f\vi
-ref -sl-----dge elE-'v_----_---_--- udge accL�n)uIatiCn
Bottom elnv...
Lagoon size: L ngth .2 7 9.'-- Width �[�` p. !�:_ at- ycjs- e;:eavateci l0 23, a
M !1.• I •// .� W UP / 1 •
r ••
GE:NEI;A{L.� I 1' F (7F;11raT I ON
'
JOD CLASS: r 1 L
HAZARD CLASS:._Q
ANIMAL, TYPE & NUMBER:_ ¢Dd_ sowa_
KIND OF OPERATION:rra
HOTE: If constrUCtian is not
started within ane year, this
plan is riot. valid Un L i l re--
eva l L.tat i can of flood plain for
safety 1-iarArd is; Irl.-ldc-.2.
L.AGE701,4 1_-0R, ANII`1A(_ WASTE
( SINGLE SaT()GE)
�,P_s � Y C'rbL"Q_ ARI,
TATE
U. S. DEf='AFiITIENT 01-_ r (3F\'I(~1JL'TURL
;U Ll_ C0NSLI:VAT I C7N riC f:V I"l�E:
17ESIGNED OY:
('iPF'F'()VE=1)
-rITLE:
DATE:

Producer: MOHESKY (CLOVER FARM)
Foundation Preparation._ All trees and brush shall be removed from
the impoundment area before construction is started. The foundation
of the lagoon shall be cleared of all trees, stumps, roots, brush,
sod, organic soil, and debris. All stumps and all roots exceeding 1
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of 1 foot.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. After clearing
is completed the foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly and
roughly leveled, with suitable equipment, before placement of any
embankment material.
Removal of Existing Tile Drains;_ When specified, the contractor
shall construct an observation trench along the entire length of the
embankment to a minimum of five feet in depth. The trench shall
have a bottom width adequate to accommodate the equipment used for
excavation, backfill, and compaction operations and the side slopes
shall be 1:1 of flatter. When the drains are encountered, the tile
shall be removed to a minimum of 15 feet beyond the downstream
embankment toe as measured perpendicular to the embankment. If a
tile line exists above the embankment it shall be rerouted around
the lagoon in an approved location. The trench shall be backfilled
and compacted as noted under Embankment Construction.
cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated to a minimum
depth of 24 inches under the embankment. The exact depth shall be
determined on site by NRCS. The trench shall be located at or
upstream from the centerline of the dam. The trench shall have a
bottom width adequate to accommodate the equipment used for
excavation, backfill, and compaction operations and the side slopes
shall be 1:1 of flatter. The cutoff trench shall be backfilled with
clay material. The trench shall be backfilled and compacted as
specified under Embankment Construction. All standing water shall
be removed from the trench before backfilling is started.
Excavation: Topsoil shall be stocked piled separately for later
use. The completed excavation shall conform to the lines, grades,
and elevations shown on the plans. The lagoon bottom shall be
approximately level and the side slopes shall be uniform from top to
bottom. Scarify the bottom and cut slopes of the .lagoon a minimum
depth of six inches and compact to decrease the permeability of the
soil. Compaction shall be with a sheepsfoot or tamping roller.
Liner: The minimum required thickness shall be 1.? feet. A liner
is required when the attached soils investigation report so
indicates or when unsuitable material is encountered during
construction. When areas of unsuitable material are encountered,
they will be over -excavated below finish grade to the specified
depth as measured perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation
shall be backfilled as specified to grade with a NRCS approved_
material (ie - CL,CH,MH,SC).
1

Soil liner material shall come from an approved borrow area. The
minimum water content of the liner material shall be optimum
moisture content which relates to that moisture content when the
soil is kneaded in the hand it will form a ball which does not
readily separate. Water shall be added to borrow as necessary to
insure proper moisture content during placement of the liner. The
moisture content of the liner material shall not be less than
optimum water content during placement. The maximum water content
relates to the soil material being too wet for efficient use of
hauling equipment and proper compaction. The fill shall be brought
up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9 inches in
thickness prior to compaction. Each layer will be compacted by a
minimum of four passes of a sheepsfoot or tamping roller or
equivalent method approved by the designer.
The soil liner shall be protected from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes by using rock or flexible outlets on the waste pipes.
Embankment Construction: The completed earthfill shall conform to
the lines, grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill
material shall be free of sod, roots, stones over six (6) inches in
diameter, and other objectionable materials. Previous material (SP
or SM) shall not be used in the embankment except the outside
slopes. As a minimum compaction shall be equivalent to, or better
than, the following: 1). layers of fill material shall not exceed 9
inches in thickness before compaction, 2). the routing of the
hauling and spreading equipment over the fill must be in such a
manner that every point on the surface of each layer of fill will be
traversed by not less than one tread track of the loaded equipment
traveling in a direction parallel to the main axis of the fill. 3).
Clayey soils shall be compacted with a sheepsfoot or tamping roller.
Construction of the fill shall be undertaken only at such times that
the moisture content of the fill material will permit a reasonable
degree of compaction.
Construction of the embankment shall allow an additional 5% for
settlement. Stock piled topsoil shall be spread over top of
embankment and outside side slopes for the establishment of
vegetation. The side slopes of the settled embankment shall not be
less than 3 horizontal to 1 vertical.
Quality Assurance: During construction of the earth embankment, a
qualified inspector as designated by the designer must be on site
during construction as necessary to verify proper construction.
Testing will be required as deemed necessary by the inspector and/or
designer.
During construction of a clay liner, a qualified construction
inspector as designated by the designer must be on site during
construction as necessary to verify the liner is installed in.,
accordance with NRCS South National Technical Center (SNTC)
Technical Note 716 (revised Sept. 1993). In the absence of
I

=A
supervision of construction by a qualified inspector, the liner must
be tested to verify a maximum allowable permeability of 0.00001
cm/sec.
When testing is required, the owner will be responsible for
furnishing test results and certification that the construction
meets the design requirements. Any tests and certification should
be performed by a certified laboratory.
Emergency Spillway: The emergency spillway shall be placed in
undisturbed soil when possible. When it must be placed in fill
material, the fill material will consist of clay and compaction
will be by sheepsfoot or tamping roller.
Inlet and Overflow Pipes:_ Pipes that convey waste from the houses
to the lagoon shall be a minimum of 6 inches in diameter and have a
minimum slope of 1 percent. The pipes shall be installed in a
manner that will prevent erosion of the lagoon side slope by
extending the pipe beyond the slope of the lagoon and discharging
the waste below the surface. Overflow pipes, used to discharge
effluent from one lagoon to another, shall have a minimum diameter
of 6 inches with a elbow or tee on the inlet end.
Pollution Control During construction: Stripping of embankment and
borrow areas shall be done as they are needed in a normal sequence
of construction. Use temporary mulch protection on all disturbed
areas that are subject to erosion and will not have substantial
additional work performed for 30 days.
Vegetation: Vegetation shall be established on the slopes,
embankment top and all other disturbed areas, except the area that
will be inundated, as specified in the plans as soon as possible
after construction. Necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that a
good stand of vegetation is established in a reasonable amount of
time.
So rcj �w� -je �tscre
Seeding rates are: _15 1b.Common Bermudagrass
7S lb. 11&4:4 Gress
_ _800 lb. 10-,Z0-10 ^
2 tons lime per acre
1.5 tons wheat straw per acre
Permanent Stake: A permanent stake (CCA salt treated 411x4" post or
1 inch diameter PVC pipe with tee) marked to indicate pumping
level elevations, shall be placed in the inside slope at one end of
the lagoon.
I

Producer: MOHESKY (CLOVER FARM)
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and
side slopes: Common Bermudagrass is being established on
these areas. Beginning in 1997 and each year thereafter,
the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds of 10-
10---10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least monthly. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes
a. separation of joints
b. cracks or breaks
C. accumulation of salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2. Lagoon surface -
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a.
settlement,
cracking
or "jug" holes
b.
side slope
stability
- slumps or bulges
C.
wet or damp
areas on
the back slope
d.
erosion due
to lack
of vegetation or as a result of
wave action
e.
rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump - recycling and irrigation pumps
1

a. overall pump operation
b. leaks
C. loose fittings
5. Surface water diversion
a. adequate vegetation
b. diversion capacity
C. ridge berm height
B. operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a
total of 400 sows/animals (Farrow to Weanling). The lagoon
contains both permanent and temporary storage. The
permanent storage is not to be pumped in order to ensure
that anaerobic action will occur. The design storage
includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes
capacity for the volume of waste produced over 90 days, the
amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event, and
rainfall in excess of evaporation. Your facility is
designed for 90 days of temporary storage; therefore, it
will need to be pumped every three months. Begin pump -out
of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation 54.4 feet
as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the
fluid level reaches elevation 52.0 feet. Pumping can be
started or stopped at any time between these two elevations
for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste
without runoff or leaching.
The attached waste management plan must be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see
Attachment B) before land application. The waste material
should be analyzed before each application cycle to
determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the area of
application should be made annually to insure the waste is
applied as reasonably and practically possible to
recommended rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be precharged with a volume of
water equal to one-half of the treatment volume before
wastes are introduced. Precharging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon
thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush
water and irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below

• the surface and as far from the inlet pipes as possible in
order to provide a cleaner effluent for flushing and to
reduce odors when irrigating on land. When these pipes are
placed through the embankment, they should be installed no
more than two feet below top of dike and not in the highest
section of fill. The pipe trench should be compacted with
clay material.
After five years the waste treatment lagoon must be checked
for sludge accumulation annually. If sludge has encroached
into the treatment volume, the sludge must be removed and
applied at agronomic rates based on analysis of the sludge.
Treatment volume must have a minimum of 4 feet of depth free
of sludge at all times.
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) in North Carolina revised water quality regulations
that address animal operations. These rules became
effective on February 1, 1993 (15A NCAC 2H .0200). This
animal operation shall be operated within the requirements
of these rules and regulations.
3

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR WASTE TREATMENT
LAGOON POLYETHYLENE GEOMEMBRANE LINING 0�
OPERATOR: CLOVER M. FARMS, INC.
COUNTY: EDGECOMBE COUNTY
SCOPE: The work shall consist of placing a 40 mil High Density Polyethylene ( )
geomembrane in a newly constructed waste treatment lagoon for Clover M. Farms, Inc. to
the elevations, grades, and cross sections as shown on the lagoon drawings.
MATERIAL: The HDPE geomembrane shall be GSE HD supplied by GSE Lining
Technology, Inc. or equivalent. The geomembrane shall meet the material properties as
described by the supplier.
SUBGRADE PREPARATION: The area to be lined shall be drained and allowed to
dry until the surface is firm and can support the men and equipment that must travel over
it during installation of the geomembrane. All cut slopes and fills in the area to be lined
must be sloped no steeper than 3 horizontal to 1 vertical. All fills and cut slopes shall be
thoroughly compacted by mechanized pans during the hauling and spreading process.
The foundation area for the geomembrane shall be smooth and free of projections that can
damage the geomembrane. Stumps and roots shall be removed. Rocks, hard clods, and
other such material shall be removed, rolled with a smooth wheel vibratory roller so as to
provide a smooth surface, or covered with a 8 oz./s.y. needle punch nonwoven geotextile.
An anchor trench shall be excavated completely around the top of the lagoon dike three to
four feet from the inside top edge. The trench shall be 24 inches deep and about 12
inches wide.
PLACEMENT: The HDPE geomembrane shall be free of damage or defect. Each package
delivered to the job site shall bear the name of the material, the manufacturer's name or symbol,
the quantity therein, and the thickness or weight of the material.
Each HDPE geomembrane panel shall be laid out and positioned to keep the number and length
of the geomembrane field joint seams to a minimum and consistent with proper methods of
geomembrane installation. Seams shall be oriented down, not across the slope. Sharp corners
shall be avoided. Horizontal and T-shaped seams on slopes must be kept to a minimum.
The method used to unroll the HDPE geomembrane panels shall not cause scratches or crimps in
the geomembrane. The method used to place the panels shall minimize wrinkles (especially
differential wrinkles between adjacent panels). Ballast shall be used to prevent relocation of the
compensating wrinkles by wind. Adequate loading (e.g., sand bags or similar items that will not
damage the HDPE geomembrane) shall be placed to prevent uplift by wind. In case of high
winds, continuous loading is recommended along edges of panels to minimize risk of wind flow
under the panels.

Direct contact with the HDPE geomembrane shall be minimized, i.e., the geomembrane in traffic
areas shall be protected by an overlayment of geotextile, extra HDPE geomembrane, or other
suitable materials.
The top edge of the geomembrane shall be placed in the anchor,trench and anchored with
compacted backfill. Compact backfill by wheel rolling with light rubber tired equipment or
manually directed power tamper.
Field seams shall be made by overlapping adjacent sheets and fusion welding the overlapped
sheets using double fusion welders and extrusion welders. Seams between HDPE geomembrane
sheets shall be field welded using the fabricator's seaming apparatus and technique.
The primary seaming method will be a double fusion welder. Prior to fusion seaming, all areas
which are to become seam interfaces will be cleansed of dust and dirt. Seam joining shall not
take place unless the sheet is dry and shall not be attempted when the ambient temperature is
below 32 degrees F or above 100 degrees F.
The extrusion welders shall be used only at areas which cannot be welded using the double
fusion welder. For extrusion welds the geomembrane shall be preheated and pressed together to
align for welding.
No base T-seam shall be closer than 5 feet to the toe of the slope. Seams shall be aligned with
the least possible number of wrinkles and "fishmouths." If a fishmouth or wrinkle is found, it
shall be relieved and cap -stripped.
All loose seam edges exceeding 2" shall be removed on the exposed side after seam strength
testing has been completed using a hook knife.
No equipment or tools shall damage the HDPE geomembrane by handling, trafficking, or other
means. Personnel working on the geomembrane shall not smoke, wear damaging shoes, or
engage in other activities that could damage the geomembrane. Use of metal tools shall be kept
to a minimum.
REPAIR PROCEDURES: Defective seams shall be re started/re seamed according to GSE
specifications. Holes, tears, blisters, undispersed raw materials, and contamination by foreign
matter shall be repaired by patches according to GSE Lining Technology, Inc. specifications.
VENTS: Provide relief vents around the perimeter of the structure to allow gases to escape form
under the geomembrane. Locate vents on a maximum spacing of 100 feet. Construct vents as
recommended by GSE Lining Technology, Inc.
SEALING AROUND THE PENETRATIONS: The seals around any penetration (pipe
openings) shall be performed using a method as recommended by GSE Lining Technology, Inc.
FIELD QUALITY CONTROL: The installer shall nondestructively test all field seams over
their full lengths. Seams shall be tested according to methods as recommended by GSE Lining
Technology, Inc. All test equipment shall be furnished by the Installer.

All seams and non -seam areas of the geomembrane shall be inspected by the Installer for
defects, holes, blisters, undispersed raw materials, and any sign of contamination by
foreign matter. The HDPE geomembrane surface shall be brushed, blown, or washed by
the Installer if the amount of dust or dirt inhibits inspection.
All defects found during testing shall be repaired and retested. Such tests and
adjustments shall be repeated until the repairs are complete.
BASIS OF ACCEPTANCE: The acceptability of the geomembrane shall be determined
by inspections to check compliance with all the provisions of this specification with
respect to the drawings, markings, the appurtenances, and the minimum installation
requirements.
The installing contractor shall certify that the installation complies with the requirements
of this specification. A written guarantee shall be furnished that protects the owner
against defective workmanship and materials for not less than one year and that identifies
the manufacturer and markings of the geomembrane.
VEGETATION: A protective cover of vegetation shall be established on the disturbed
area outside of the geomembrane. Seeding and fertilizer rate shall be as shown in the
lagoon construction specifications.
FENCING: The area covered by the geomembrane shall be protected from puncture by
livestock and deer trampling by means of installing a fence with gates(s). The fence
shall provide protection against deer jumping over as well as small animals crawling
through. Fencing shall be installed in accordance with NRCS's Technical Guide Section
IV Practice Standard No. 382,
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: Construction operations shall be performed in
such a manner that erosion and air and water pollution are minimized and held within
legal limits. The owner, operator, Contractor or other persons will conduct all work and
operations in accordance with proper safety codes for the type of construction being
performed with due regards to the safety of all persons and property. The installation
shall be completed in a workmanlike manner and present a neat and pleasing appearance.

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE: This practice will require the performance of
periodic operation and maintenance to ensure continued satisfactory performance. These
recommendations are provided to develop a good operation and maintenance program:
Prevent the misuse or travel of any equipment or animal, and limit human traffic over
the geomembrane.
2. Fences shall be maintained to provide warning and /or prevent unauthorized human or
livestock entry.
Eradicate or otherwise remove any growth or debris that may harm or reduce the
effectiveness of the geomembrane.
4. Immediately repair the effects of any vandalism, vehicular, or animal damage to any
earthfills, linings, pipe outlets, or other structures.
5. Maintain vegetative cover, free of woody vegetation on the lagoon dikes outside of
the geomembrane. Mow at least twice a year.
6. Remove any burrowing rodents that could affect the geomembrane integrity.
7. Inspect exposed geomembrane material for the affects of exposure to sunlight.
8. Ensure the proper operation of the lining vents and note its performance.
Landowner/operator concurrence to operation and maintenance
requirements:
Name: °u� Y n
Date: WOr 91

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Fanns Inc - Conetoe Farm
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg NC 27878
Dear R.H. Mohesky:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
December 30, 1999
l411�1 12
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Numberr33_,52..,
Edgecombe:County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely, �f
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
.. Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms Inc - Conctoc Farm
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg NC 27878
Farm Number: 33 ='S2>
Dear R.H. Mohesky:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 15, 1999 M
0»
ca
0-
t L_J
You are hereby notified that Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to
submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws
(Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Charles
Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
c
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

CLOVER M FARMS INC
ID:919-977-4578 JUL 08'99 5.5:53 No.006 P.01 ,
ANMAL WASX`U MAN GF1V�SYSTEM:
Farm Naive
Facility ID Number: .--�� County: Y
Cert e 0 ew I oeW Security #
Work Phone L L ? ' _...� Bowe Phone G 9 �
Signature
Mailing Address CY
State Telephone#
hate 9�
plem Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raieigb, N.C. 27626-0535
ASK : 'g.t �� %`k -
Ex14 3/.�

#'sionf Fulln� 1WutgrCobse.�tip�Dt ltanE�e Iec� �r r I ,�,
ij hr i� `+'11iu to sc:� e !
uu
+, t ry sn iDt�SiD)� ff1�atta;r Qtrlt�ity � CDrnpi��nt�It��u#1sns
QtllF A'eiri ��d4 6fAtlgl<1.EV1�YY:
rNCLJ. Jr" �-
10 Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection L'
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified Cj Conditionally Certified [] Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County: : ,c �t
Farm Name,.:Q..IS/.:...J...C.r�............... h .....� .,��1:G.... r`...::......................
OwnerName : ..................................................... ............................... .......... 11................. .... I....... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ........................-111...................................-1-11-... Title:.........................................................:...... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing; Address: ...................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:....1.............:J�...�r'f'./.:Z....................................... Integrator:........ .......................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.......... ................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • R -J4 44 Longitude 0 6 66
Swine. Ca acit „'
.u�atiori
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
W arrow to Wean
arrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Ntimbei
Design Current Design., : 'Current
Poultry . Ca aci Po . ulation Cattle ;;Ca aci ' . Po ulatioi
❑ Layer 1 1 JE1 Dairy
❑ Nan -Layer JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacti
Total SSLW
]_ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
]
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
4 g
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes)IINo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water. of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes m No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? es /No Y
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Identifier, f
Freeboard (inches): ... .�........................ ..........!..6 ....................... G.1..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back;,

Facility Number: 3 —j Date of 1iEtit�retiun �
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes dj No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Applica_tipn
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
1 1. Is [here evidence of over application? r �❑ Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes 1
12. Crop type 6- 1 11 Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 2'Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes [],No
Required
Records & Document_s
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
,ryes
❑ No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
Q�j No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑v<o
13- �'Vo yiQlaiigttrls o� d�flcienci. .were ;noted . jFt i . g this:visit; YWA will t�-ecoive Ito. ffthee
.•.•corresponr)tence.aboitri.this.visit.�.��•����•��.�.�.�.�.�.�.�:-'�'.•.... .. .... ... .. .
Comment§ (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recodi' mendationsor any other comments.
Use,drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)- .
0 6 IU FhJh'1 c4 x-te tIT C gP��-1 GrF�5LE (-✓13� S �4r'7,oL� Ins v.�1/IAI�
��. Udlt !�S U. I NvT G 5E7Pr V A)Loj
T 6-O C q ignP � r►7 e; 5 f%'� x 1 i` %,V^
u t�/�rJ{mot
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /� y� j' J� ,,�' Date:
711.2100

Facility Number: t... — Date n#' lufipcction ')
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes vVNo
30. Were any major maintenance prublems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals Feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ YesXNo
3/23/99

—� Revised lanuan, 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 3 - �� 2—
Farms Name: C,� 2'+
On -Site Representative: tZ•ff /"0ti471
T
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: P,Ll
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP:2-3-
Operation is'flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: " e6 pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary -gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an l or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART It. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and ocumentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination equi ed b cause o ation f ils one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acr g w�re�su>ltedin ver appl' you of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) accord' to farmsy of irrigation records.
�2 Unclear, illegible, or lack otionlmap.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits fieid(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised lanuan, 22, 1999
�ity"Number
art III. Field. by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD
NUMBER NUMBER' Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD COMMENTS'
%
c
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer wiil have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible, otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER` - must be clearly deiireated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrication records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-uc fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrication system.

CLOVER 6i SERVICES-9 Inc.
P. O. Box 215 • Sharpsburg, North Carolina 27878 • Telephone [phone]
June 28, 1999
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
CERTIFIED MAIL
Subject: Memo dated June 3, 1999
Notice of Deficiency
Conetoe Farm
Facility # 33-52
Edgecombe County
Mr. Kenneth Schuster:
L-
This memo is intended to reply with your request on the here -in referenced
subject.
1. The operator in charged has been changed to:
R. H. Mohesky certificate # 16629
Secondary - Tom Robinson certificate #18818
2. The bermuda pasture was not overseeded. However, the pasture has been
mowed to prevent shading.
Sincerely,
(555
Clover M Services, Inc.
R. H. Mohesky
President

,, l
s 'Water Conservation .Operation Review ' �' $"'� L
0 Division o i and
[3 Di n of Soil and WateriConservation CompliancetInspect�on` erg kt.
"-•
on + wk"'w ' i�.i lVI$iOn O W$tet QU$Itty€ 'Compliance Inspectii 6 ELK i'�ir ;q § i" €�
tj
€.r € ` -air. !� + + Et ,' - €-<�t�i b�
Other A enc O eration Review= � � � r
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-ue of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number $72— Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 1 0 o b 24 hr.-(hh:mm)
El Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified (] Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .. . � �u't . f'�.�!+ County: ,. Ls„�.,fi_C Ati. b:. e.................:.....................
//� ff .• 1
Owner Name:............... /n [} h a, . .............................................................. Phone No:...........................
Facility Contact: ................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
....................AA..................... / / V
Mailing Address:......:. 4/ 0 k.,. �.L......5�?.'....s lJl��� 1���-........._t......7...A..................................... ..........................
/�................. .....
Onsite Representative: lam• F� ' M i) 4 "/'�� lntegrator:..Gi l L�Cr..2.. .... ```5......
............ ............ ........... ..... .....
Certified Operator:,,., T 1-2146-e- % Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm: G .V / Y" � ✓1 r
.................................................................................................................................................................................................... V............................................... —
... ................................................................ ............................................
Latitude �' �' �" Longitude 0 •
Design Current.. _ Design Current 7, .1 Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Cattle:
Capacity Eopulatton ;.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ F er to Finish
Zj Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
FED
Layer ❑ Dairy
Non -Layer „'E�E ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
a a;
r , Total Design Capacity
i.J�1
I k
-
Discharizes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure a
Identifier:ITH
25/
Freeboard(inches): ................ ............ .........r..l........................................ .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes [4-110�'
❑ Yes <o
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
VNo'
❑ Yes
No
Structure 6
Co.El YZ
.Mma
3/23/44

M
Facility Number: Z Date of Inspection r
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? I ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Apelication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
12. Crop type r I--
13. Do the receiving crops differ wi h those designated i the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [:]Yes
��'No�.
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? wers
s jd o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? or o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? es 0 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? V1 Q A5- �-=j b ►^�tn ,ter/ 5-) 17-S -Df 4-d �sti4/-r f �-C_ es [INo
Omn
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes o
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
8'N-o
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
o�
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
s
0 No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes -No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
t es
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
r
❑ Yes
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0"No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
;No
0: Ko yiolapgris'or• de ci6ncies •were pgted• during this visit' - Y:oik :WHI-teeeiye ii6 fuftho
coerespondeRce. about this .visit.. . . . . . . . . . .
C1. nenottme' , s1. E
Use drawttigs of facility tti better explarn srtuations (nse arlditianal� pages as, necessary) '? jjj ix ; , 3.;A
-:. I 1., !t',' i .. r.: fG. d: "➢ d:" £, i. <.�.¢...a .a €... Cs .,6. 4f`ia.. 4
►V � G� fr � �'� � �C , ti� �`,e. n D l�� tf J✓�� r� G i [N�r''"" ��
ry1 ,� !•'1 D LS � �� r L r 4-v ew_1 � '� ` 7 '* d OL (o 4-,) chh9n�jz 6g, I. J=, c T • -.
��S , W 1 { �� ti � 6.rt-�i 4� �•P 14t r� � 0.��� � f �-T� ti- s o � � f3- T cv,D ����
N�iQjp Cah be J�7 ��1F d1(q_ .Sr% / %1 /
Reviewer/Inspector Name }; '1 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RFQ1TESTED
Mr. Roland H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, North Carolina 27878
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Conetoe Farm
Facility # 33-52
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
On May 17, 1999, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted
a compliance inspection at the subject swine facility. The following deficiencies
were noted:
There was no current Operator In Charge for this facility. Mr. Ken Page was listed
as the OIC for the Conetoe Farm and the inspection revealed that Mr. Page is no
longer employed by Clover M Farms. You should contact Ms. Beth Buffington with
our Operator Training and Certification Branch to obtain a change form to designate
another Operator In Charge for this facility.
The receiving crop needs improvement. The winter overseed needed to be removed
so that the underlying coastal bermuda will not be shaded out.
Please respond to this Noticein writing within fourteen days of your receipt. The
Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in correcting these matters. If
you have any questions you may call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
fMn�
A6Uanneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe Health Dept.
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
3900 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RAMON. NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE 9t9-571-4700 FAX 919.87t-4716
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 30% RECYCLEO/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

`F1i1z
❑ Div n of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 3 d 24 hr. (hh:mm)
©Registered Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted IONotOperational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......................
"P:!� ..........::�.!':!`:`.................................................... county: L- �. �..�..
Owner Name:.:.:. Z Z' 7
rn............................................................................ Phone No:.............
FacilityContact: '':............................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ....U...zL........h.rhxr................�.�.�............................................... ..........................
{{�� �-� M d �l e /C. ..% C�t) vc 2 tx-\
Onsite Representative:.!`~:...... ................................ Integrator:....... ......................................
Certified Operator:.........K�!h......... ..- ..........:.. ......... .... .. Operator Certification Number;.....................
Location of Farm: �1„j
Latitude �' �' �" Longitude•
Aestgn' Current Design Current Design : Current
Swine z.'Capac'tty Population Poultry' x. Capacity Population Cattle Capacity, Paputon
x ..
VWean Feeder ❑ Layer Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy Wean t.
❑ Other ..
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish ''oral Design CapaClty
' GiltsAl
a ota
[IBoars
SLW3
AAl
Nuber o its / Noldi PDnds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Feld Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes X
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El N
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97

4.w
Facility Number:
r
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons,11oldine fonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes L�No
❑ Yes , No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .................................. ......................................................... ........................................................................ .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ��9. ........�C... f i s.....................................................................................................................................................,.�.........���
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes l,d'No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No
18, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes EJ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
20. Does facilityr uire a follow-up visit b same a enc ? ❑ Yes:N��5o eq p Y g Y21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For_Certitied or Perini tted•Facilities Only
23. Does the facilit it to have a copy *of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes
24. Were a additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
25. a any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
Ll No.violation5-or. deficiencies. were• noted• during this.visit.. Yon.will r_eceive-no-furthier- .
�.-correspQ�idei�ceaU.oittfhis:visit:::.;:-:-:�:-:-. ;-:::�.:.• �.-::�:�: ; :.:.�:.:�:�.: .

Follow-up of
Facility Number'.���� S
13 Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
FarmName:....-U. ?.t- .... ��.L%......... ................................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 3 Gi`d
Time of Inspection _U 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
.............. County:.....1���...?.............................
OwnerName:_... ............................................. ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ............. ....................................................................................................... .............................................................
Onsite Representative:.......:....r ..... Integrator:...... i/;
Certified Operator;................................................................................................. . Operator Certification Number:................
Location of Farm:
Latitude C¢ ' Longitude a 6 L_._ ____I'°
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes �No
Dischar-e originated ac ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 4 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [I Yes {io
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes _,ZNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes VNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes 16 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes A�No
7/25/97 Continued on hack

Facility Number: 3�-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons,Iiolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure. 5
Identi0er:.....I......1................................................................... J.
.......... .................. ................. ........................... I....... ...
Freeboard (ft):...l.r`�I•..........................{.......................����ja.................................. ..
................................................. .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14, is there physical evidence of over application?.
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waterrss of the State, notify DW
15. Crop type .... p�'�''
...................... ..�1!`!%�....�........,(�,1��S
...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'?
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2I. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes EINo
❑ Yes 5,No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
�o
❑ Yes L No
El Yes INO
❑ Yes P4O
❑ Yes
....................................
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;a No
❑ Yes ,-No
❑ Yes �'S�10
❑ Yes/No
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes No
No.violations or deficiencies. were noted ditr.ing this.visit. You.rvill receive no further'',
correspondence about this visit.'
❑ Yes 10, No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �NO
a- a tiov ,�� fll elc- N t E-PE0 YC i i Id s Yt1%��
e-5
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i?'rf ��/.i[�� C/ ,(��Pi� Date: 'Jf'b

State of North Carolina IT
Department of Environment, 'k?FA
Health and Natural Resources ` • 0
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary EDF-=HNF;Z
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms Inc - Coneto�m
PO Box 215 jl �• ppR
Sharpsburg NC 27878 "z
otice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
I , f Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
Facility Number 33--52
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve;W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535. ���� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/i0°h post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
!A4�ja
1DEF.HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 28, 1997
Mr. R.H. Mohesky
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, North Carolina 27878
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 33-52
Conetoe Farm
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
On July 17, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal.waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would' also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. I€ you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at (919) 571-4 000.
Sincerely,
J y Ga rett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
CC., Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, W' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%W C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50w recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Farm Status:- egist, ed ❑ Applied for Permit
Certified ❑ Permitted
n❑/Not Operational /Date Last
(Operated: .................................._......_......._......................................................................_....._.................
Farm Name: .S r(..Oi .! ._ ...a.5 ltZY1.E .'�P-e:.._F?!u?.....__...... County: ..:GS0:r.:.!b...a=..............................
p , / (�.. �1 G1 a
Land Owner Name:...-. lr ..1.........m.QB��..S[_................ _....................... Phone No: ... ...1._�. ..r..._1....Z ....... _ .4...�.............
Facility Conctact:
Title:
Mailing Address: .... ..__U__..u_ .... �LJ_5..........
�"A✓j? S tc�
Onsite Representative:.2..
D I ..... c
Certified Operator:..... F:..3!7......M J ts€"........................................ _............
/.................. ...
Location of Farm: ldi, , !' 2,
Phone No:
-1-7
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude =* 0` 0" Longitude =• 0` 0,.
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 'a"'"
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 0 N
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes NN
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

n
)racility Number:... — =�
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes l!f No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Strugturgs [ agoov. and/or Holding
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes eNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
...... ►a...... ...... ......... ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes E o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes k Vo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes r`-""'
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es i_3 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes � 1Vu
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
r
15. Crop type - K_!! s .............................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes ❑ No
00
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
go
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
;No
21.
For
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Certified Facilities Only
❑Yes
No
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/inspector Name : a ,. °4 , ��: a.:.z al . ...:. ..f.: H:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: :Z l ` 97
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
e��
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 22, 1996
Mr. R. H. Mohesky
Clover M. Farms
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, North Carolina 27878
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Conetoe Farm Swine Operation
North Carolina Highway 42
Facility No. 33-52
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
On August 6, 1996, Mr. Eric Fleek from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection
is part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
liquid waste disposal systems.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Water Quality is
required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural
resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of
a waste management plan.
The inspector noted that this facility has (according to Clover M.
representative Robert Kreft) sealed the pipe in the lagoon wall by filling it
with concrete. Also, the Division of Water Quality's records indicate that this
facility was originally registered for farrow to feeder swine. Currently this
facility has changed to a farrow to wean operation. As a result, no increase in
Steady State Live Weight occurred and according to 15A NCAC 2H .0203 (15), this
change does not constitute an expansion of the operation.
This Office appreciates the assistance of Mr. Kreft during the inspection.
If you have any question regarding the results of the inspection please call Mr.
Eric Fleek or Mrs. Judy Garrett at 571-4700.
Sincerely J
Z, '04,,Z'UJ�
Ji3flv E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Edgecombe County Health Department
Steve Bennett-N.C. Div. of Soil and Water Conservation
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, OW FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27bf19 N :� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number: 3a_ a
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operationstee VAWtation Record
Date:j `
Time:
Farm Name: ' �,_ 1 VI
Owner�Name: i - bb
On Site Representative:��11O�1d�Y r
Mailing Address: W
_ 2.O - 0 l�
Physical Address/Location: - lU C �=
LeiAV CW
Latitude: I I ' Longitude: I I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
C
( I ArfO
Kof Swine No. of An Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Carde No. of Animals
ow C] Layer ❑ Dairy
ursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
0 Feeder Fur ;v,,5 to Foec& -, ir, h4 5 ico r Mt%_40
OtherType of Livestock: Number of Animals: V_ev"%�
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each Iagoon)
utility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑ Nov
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑ NoX
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑ NoM
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑ No
0 Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
I
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Ye4 No ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes ❑DNo ❑
(list the crops which need improvem nt}
MGv
�Ei
Crop type:Cj
/Vi 4L Acreage:
�,xA;�ii Gr�74P-
Setback Criteria
LU R C 5
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑ No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑ No
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑ N04,
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ N�
A01 -- January 17,1996

Faciiiry Number:, --
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operation ite 11' itation Record
Date: l�
Timer_ -
General Information: }
Farm Name: LlUV ( ___county:_0S4:2C0444x2
Owner Name: Phone No:_ 44 (a-t 635
On Site Representative: Integrator:
Mailing Address: °� ,`
- (cy JV N.0 G _
Physical Address/Location: 5 2 -
6�NC ( �
Latitude: I I Longitude: 1 I
eration D crl ti n: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. ofAnimals Type of Poultry No, of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Sow 1140 a Layer ❑ Dairy
Nursery G] Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder
OtherType of Livestock- Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Irtsgec 'ran:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes x No ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No 4
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ NO*
Is any discharge observed? Yes ❑ Nox
❑ Man-made 0 Not Man-made
Cover Crop M�c�
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ o ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement.. Yes ❑ No ❑
( list the crops whit' need improvement) j qw4{�`
Crop type:— 0( k Acreage: ��-vJ F P[d„�
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ Na
Is animal waste stockpiled within I00 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes k No ❑
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Ye0k No ❑
AOI -- January 17,1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R. H. Mohesky
CIover M Farms Inc.
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
AA±fi LIMMI
C)EHNI =1
March 6, 1996
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil
Penalties for Violation(s) of N.C.
General Statute(s) 143-215(e)
Edgecombe County
File No, CF 95-12
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Clover M Farms Inc. in the
amount of $4,338.00 including $338.00 in investigative costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was
taken under the authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any
continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional
penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (do not include waiver
form j. Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement
action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of. -
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
w.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure
for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the
assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of
your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office
the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
2
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the
petition must be served on the Department as follows:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

Failure to exercise one of the'options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a
date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this
matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action
to collect the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for
future violations which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: iRaleigh Regional Supervigor-w/-attachmentsD
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF EDGECOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF
CLOVER M FARMS INC.
FOR A VIOLATION OF
G.S. 143-215(e)
CONSTRUCTING A CONVEYANCE FOR
WILLFULLY DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS
TO WATERS OF THE STATE
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
File No. CF 95-12
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I, A. Preston
Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), make the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Clover M Farms Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the.
State of North Carolina.
B. Clover M Farms Inc. operates an animal feeding operation on N.C. 42 East of
Conetoe, North Carolina.
C . On August 4, DEM staff observed a discharge of wastewater by Clover M Farms
lagoon to an unnamed tributary to Conetoe Creek, which are Class C-NSW waters of
the State.
D. Clover M Farms Inc, willfully discharged pollutants to waters of the State.
E. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totalled $338.00.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Clover M Farms Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S.143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The unnamed tributary to Conetoe Creek constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(1) pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above -cited discharge constituted constructing a conveyance for the willful
discharge of pollutants from an animal feeding operation to waters of the State
pursuant to 143-215(e).

D. Clover M Farms Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215(e), which provides the Commission the authority to assess fines and
penalties not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5000.00) for the first offense for the
willful discharge of pollutants from an animal feeding operation to waters of the State.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Clover M Farms
Inc. pursuant to G.S. 143-2I5.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).
F. The Director, Division of Environmental Management, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties in this
matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Clover M Farms Inc. is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 4ed-" • ° v
$ Gfor -'p . Q J
$_338.00
$ 4/3 3Ir. 0'0
for constructing a conveyance for the willful discharge of pollutants
from an animal feeding operation to waters of the State.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is gf0 percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215(e).
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage,
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
ate) A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
%?r Division of Environmental Management

DEM/RRO
95/8/7
'Memorandum: R. H. Mohesky Facility Inspection/SR 1126/Edgecombe Co:
This past Friday (95/8/4) A second R. H. Mohesky hog operation at
SR 1126 was inspected. The findings are as follows:
1) Freeboard at lowest point was 2 inches.
2) Extremely large quantities of uncontained waste were observed
between, behind, in front and along the 'sides of all of his
containment buildings. However, at the time of my visit, none of
this waste was found to be reaching surface waters.
DEM/RRO
95/8/7
Memorandum: R. H. Mohesky Facility Inspection/SR 1146/Edgecombe Co.
This past Friday (95/8/4) a third R. H. Mohesky hog operation at SR
1146 was inspected. The findings of this inspection are as follows:
1) Ditch adjacent to spray field contained what appeared to be
wastewater.
2) Spray pipe crossed over .the ditch to the spray field. At the
corner of the pipe, standing wastewater was observed only l to 2
feet from the ditch. Standing wastewater seen throughout 'the
sprayfield and along much of the spray pipe.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 28, 1995
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Steve Tedder
Through: Ken Schuster
Judy Garrett
From: Eric Fleek
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalties
Violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (a) (1) (G).
Certification for New or Expanded Animal Waste Management Plans
R.H. Mohesky, Owner
Clover M. Farm, Inc.-(Conetoe Creek Swine Operation)
NC Highway 42
Edgecombe County
Facility No. 33-52
Attached is a NOV regarding the failure of the aforementioned owner to submit the
required certification/animal waste management plan for an expanded facility
after the December 31, 1993 cutoff date. Also, please find an attached
enforcement package regarding the same owner and operation.
If you have any questions whatsoever regarding this operation, please call Ted
Cashion or Eric Fleek.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Subject:NOTICE OF VIOLATION
�EHNR
ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES
Certification for New or Expanded Animal Waste Management Plans
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d)
Clover M. Farm (Conotoe Creek Operation), Facility No. 33-52
NC Highway 42
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
This letter transmits a civil penalty assessed against R.H. Mohesky in the
amount of $1000.00 and a Notice of Violation.
This assessment and notice is based on the following facts: An approved
animal waste management plan certification was not received by the Division of
Environmental Management before animals were stocked at your facility as required
by 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0217(a) (1) (G). I conclude, R.H.
Mohesky violated or failed to act in accordance with the requirements of 15 A
NCAC 2H .0217(c). Therefore, I hereby assess R.H. Mohesky a $1000.00 civil
penalty for this violation pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A (h).
You are required to submit a certification form. Assistance in completing
the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies such as the
Soil and Water Conservation District, the USDA Soil Conservation Service, the
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service or a technical specialist designated
pursuant to rules adopted by the Soil and Water Commission. The form should be
sent to:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Failure to submit this form and a copy of your waste management plan to the
above address within 60 days of the receipt of this notice will subject the
violator to a second civil penalty assessment of a fine of up to $10,000 per day
per violation by the Division of Environmental Management and the facility being
required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit. A copy of your plan must
also be submitted to your county Soil and Water Conservation District.
Within 30 days of receipt of this notice, you must submit the required
certification form and choose one of the three following options concerning the
civil penalty assessment.
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (do not include waiver
form) . Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement
action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Fquai Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

R.H. Mohesky
Notice of Violation
Page 2
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such a request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of
the reasonableness of the amount of penalty and is not the proper
procedure for contesting the accuracy of any statements contained in
the assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the
option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing
and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached
waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S.
143B-282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the determent of the
petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter,
you must request an administrative hearing. This request must
be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with
the Office of Administrative Hearings., Post Office Drawer
27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the
petition must be served on the Department as follows:
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Failure to exercise one of the options above within 30 days, as evidenced
by a date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will
result in this matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a

R.H. Mohesky
Notice of Violation
Page ' 3
request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty. Please be advised that
this assessment does not prevent the Division of Environmental Management from
taking enforcement actions for past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext..581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett, Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC
Compliance/Enforcement File

Facility Number:Jr____�
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations tee Vx'itation Record
Date:_j .
Time:
Farm Name:
Owner N
On Site Representative:
Mailing Address: p_ D
Physical Address/Location:
56
go. WPWI ., W "In, 42
-- Fran Con.Qfoe foi lu M C
Latitude: 1 I Lon 'tude: I I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
y e of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Sow ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder rar Fcaeoor-L gya 5 *70 r to
OtherType of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?
0 Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
( list the crops which need improvem nt)
Crop type: (' /Vi Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is anima] waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI -- January 17,1996
Yes ❑
Nol�(
Yes ❑
NoX
Yes ❑
NON
Yes ❑
Nop�
Yes( No ❑
Yes ❑upNo ❑
uvRcS
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ N.0
Yes ❑ Ncb�i

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?
Is there evidence -of past discharge from. any part of the operation?
Does record keeping need improvement?
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site?
YA No ❑
Yesh, NG s j
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ N
Signature:_ -4 Date:
cc: facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations
A01 -- January 17,1996

l
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg NC 27878
MAI
EDF-=HNF:;Z
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility': Clover M Farms Inc - Conetoe Farm
Facility ID#: 33-52
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning t 's req irement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687, 4C
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100/6 post -consumer paper

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 17, 1995
M E M O R A N D U M
To:' Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Through: Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Superviso
)L-�
Through; Judy Garrett
4-
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
From: Ted Cashion.
Chemist
Eric Fleek
Environmental Technician -
Subject: Recommendation for Enforcement
Violation of G.S. 143-215(e)
R.H. Mohesky, Owner
Clover M Farm, Inc. - Swine Operation
Highway 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Attached is an enforcement action for Water Quality Section review.
This farm was inspected and a pipe in the lagoon dam was found
discharging to surface waters. Attached is a copy of the Notice of
Violation and the response from Mr. Mohesky.
This office recommends that a civil penalty be assessed against Mr.
Mohesky for violating G.S. 143-215(e). A loss of deemed permitted
status letter has already been submitted to the Central Office for
review. Please utilize the photographs sent with that letter to
use for the enforcement case if necessary.
Apparently, the enforcement action on this facility we sent
September 26, 1995 never was received by the Central. Office. We
submit this case again for your review.
If questions please call.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF EDGECOMBE
FILE No. CF
IN THE MATTER OF CLOVER M )
FARMS INCORPORATED FOR )
VIOLATION OF G.S. 143-215(e) }
CONSTRUCTING A CONVEYANCE FOR )
WILLFULLY DISCHARGING )
POLLUTANTS TO WATERS OF THE }
STATE )
acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-
215.6A, I, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the Division
of Environmental Management (DEM), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Clover M Farms Incorporated is -a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of North
Carolina.
B. On August 4, 1995, DEM staff observed a discharge of
wastewater by Clover M Farms Incorporated to an unnamed
tributary to Conetoe Creek, which is class C-NSW waters.
C. Clover M Farms Incorporated operates a swine operation
on N.C. 42 East of Conetoe, NC.
D. Clover M Farms Incorporated willfully discharged
pollutants to waters o.f the State.
E. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in
this matter totalled $338.00
Based upon the above Findings of fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. Clover M Farms Incorporated is a "person" within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Conetoe Creek constitutes waters
of the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1)
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above -cited discharge constituted constructing a
conveyance for the willful discharge of pollutants from
the swine operation to waters of the State pursuant to
143-215(e).

D. Clover M Farms Incorporated may be .assessed civil
penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215(e),
which provides the Commission the authority to assess
fines and penalties not to exceed five thousand dollars
($5000.00) for the first offense for the willful
discharge of pollutants from an animal operation to
waters of the State.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Clover M Farms pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
F. The Director, Division of Environmental Management,
pursuant to delegation provided for by G.S. 143-
215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties in
this matter.
III. DECISION
Accordingly, Clover M Farms is hereby assessed a civil
penalty of:
$ for constructing a conveyance for the willful
discharge of pollutants from a swine operation to waters
of the State.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent
of the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215(e).
$ 338.00 Enforcement costs.
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount
Of the penalty I have considered the factors listed in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of
the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality
or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the, Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Date
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: (CF) CAFO - Willful Discharge
Violator: Clover M. Farms, Inc. Registered Agent: Walter Hinson
R.H. Mohesky
Address: P.O. Box 215 Address: 2403 Wooten Boulevard
Sharpsburg, NC 27878 Suite B
Wilson, NC 27895
Regional Office: Raleigh
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from
the violation: The extent and degree of damage to the environment
is undetermined at this time. Public health may be compromised if.
the public has contact with the animal waste in the waters of the
State. Private property damage has not been documented.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: Unknown at this
time. In Mr. Mohesky's response to an NOV, he stated he purchased
the farm in March 1990 and was not aware of the drain pipe at the
time of the purchase.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality: Unknown,
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: No damage has been
documented; therefore, unable to determine.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: The costs
associated with the development and certification of a waste
management plan, the costs of purchase and -installation of a waste
distribution system and the implementation of same.
6. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management -
Commission has regulatory authority: No known prior record at this
site.
7. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Environmental Chemist II - 8 hours @ 19.34/hr. = $154.72
Environmental Tech III - 4 hours @ 14.41/hr. = 57.64
Env. Engineer II - 1 hour @ 25.64/hr. = 25.64
Administrative Costs 100.00
Total $338.00

8. Violators degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent
or restore) or recalcitrance: Mr. Mohesky has been cooperative in
this investigation.
9. Mitigating circumstances: None.
10: Assessment factors:
a) IWC - Unable to confirm but during dry periods, IWC is
expected to be 100%.
b) Receiving stream - UT to Conetoe Creek, Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
c) Damage (Yes or No)? If yes, include report from WRC. No
damage documented.
11. Include a complete Animal Operations Inspection form.
12. Include a Loss of Deemed Permit Status letter for the
Director's signature (will be sent to violator with the
assessment). Letter has already been sent downtown per Shannon
Langley - September.22, 1995.
h:\animal\mohesky.enf

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
LT:.W;WA
4,am
Abw�r�
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 9, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farm
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Subject: NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Clover M. Farm - N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe-County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
During an inspection of your swine operation facility
located on NC 42 east of Conetoe, on July 27, 1995 a pipe was
observed in the dam of the lagoon. A foliowup inspection on
August 4, 1995 showed this pipe discharging to surface waters of
the State. This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and
notification that your animal operation has been found
discharging wastewater to the surface waters of the State. North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 requires that a permit must be
secured from this Division prior to such discharges. Therefore
the existing wastewater treatment system serving your animal
operation is currently being operated without a permit as
required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
You are also being notified that this office is
considering making a recommendation for an enforcement action to
the Director of the Division for the discharge to surface waters.
If you have justification that this violation was caused by
events or circumstances beyond your control, you must reply in
writing to this office within ten (10) days after the receipt of
this Notice. Your justification will be reviewed and forwarded
to the Director for his consideration. In the absence of such
Justification, the Director shall proceed with.the recommendation
for enforcement.
Animal operations in the State have been deemed permitted
by the Division in accordance with Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual
nondischarge permit is not required if certain criteria are met.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh. North Carorina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% posf-consumer paper

Mr. Mohesky
August 9, 1995
Page 2
A major requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not
be a discharge of any wastewater from the operation to the waters
of the State.. Due to the discharge observed'on August 4, 1995,
this office will also recommend to the Director that the deemed
permitted status of this facility be revoked.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do
not hesitate to contact either Eric Fleek or Ted Cashion at 919-
571-4700.
Sincerely,
S
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Edgecombe County Health Department
Facilities Assessment Unit
h :1 animal\ mohesky. . rec
1

M1.
SENDER; ,
�9'-complete items_t. and/or 2 for additional services_
m :• Complete iteri 3, end 4a & b. ;
Priiit your nams and address on the reverse of this form so that we can .
et return this card to you. '
YFAttach this this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space
does not parrnit.,',
.441 •"Writls 'Ratum Receipt Requested" on the msiipiece below the article number
The Rewm Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
3. Article Addressed to: 48. Art
Mohesky 10
wish ,to receive the
'foliowing�,services (for an extra
au I
'fee}:
1 - ❑'Addressee's Address
cn
;..2.:❑ Restricted Deliver Y
tL €
Consult postmaster for fee.
m
ale Number.
i
14-7 Y/V
z
h
aka Clover" M 'Far-m 4b. -Service Type,
5'P 0` Box 215 ❑ Registered ❑ Insured s
N S:har'psburg , NC 27878
s� - NOR'. -far 'En1Eo`r6ement/ 0'
E'.F../T,C.tK.S. Aug leici
=Q 5.:'Signature {Addressee) $. '
an
cc 6. Si ure an
.o
PS Form $$11, December 1991 *U.S.GPO: t093-.3SZ7u
14341 ".❑ CODCb
s Mail' ❑ Return Receipt for
Merchandise
f Delivery •°•
. ssee's Address (Only if requested Y `.
Fee paid} , m
CKlcaf=E1
ESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

WALTER L: HINSON, P.A.
Walter L. Hinson ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Anna G. Brake 2401-G Wooten Boulevard
Post Office Box 7479
Wilson, North Carolina 27895-7479
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
August 10, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resource
3800 Barrett Dr.., Suite 101
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Re: Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Notice of Violation
Clover M Farm- N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
We represent R. H. and Shirley Mohesky and they have requested that we respond to your letter
of August 9, 1995. Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky purchased the farm in March, 1990. The hog facility
including the lagoon in question was existing on the property at the time of the purchase. The
Moheskys were not aware of the drain pipe in question at the time of the purchase. During the
period since they have taken title to the property they have upgraded the facilities and
continuously attempted to operate the farm in a maimer that complies with all current governing
regulations and good stewardship.
The first awareness that Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky had of the drain pipe was when it was brought to
their attention by the media. Apparently it was located by someone from your office during a
routine inspection. Based on the investigation of our clients, at the time the drain pipe was placed
in the lagoon it did not violate any governing regulations. At that time such construction was
acceptable and a common practice. The pipe was located in an area that was not readily
accessible. It was hidden by the natural vegetation of the area including grass and shrubbery -like
overgrowth. Had Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky been aware of the pipe they would have immediately
corrected the problem.

Mr. Kenneth Schuster
August 10, 1995
Page 2
In fact, the Moheskys were not aware of the situation until Friday, August 4, 1995. The
following day, on what is normally a non -business day, our clients had located a contractor. The
pipe was immediately removed and the lagoon was repaired in a workmanlike manner. It now
conforms to all regulatory requirements.
It would appear that any discharges have been nominal at most. An inspection of the immediate
area of the discharge and the general area down stream from the discharge indicates that there
have been no resulting damages.
Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky have been farm operators all of their adult lives. Mr. Mohesky was raised'.'��
on a dairy farm and his education and professional career have been in agriculture. They have
enjoyed a reputation as responsible citizens and individuals who are concerned about their
community. Any violation of the North Carolina General Statutes was unintentional and has been
corrected. We believe your review of the facts and the circumstances of this incident together
with the prompt response of Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky justify a determination that no enforcement
action is justified. We stand ready to provide you with any additional information you may -need
or to otherwise cooperate with your office.
Z
;&n
WLIVtc
cc: Mr. and Mrs. R R Mohesky

Site Requires Immediate A_rEtn6or
Facility No. '
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN7
A141MAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 11995
Farm Narae/ownenv="
Mailing Address:
County:
Integertar: _ __ __
On Site Representative:
Physica? Addre,-�ocadon:
Phone:
Phone:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Cerdfcatiou: Number: ACE DEM Cerdf�cation Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: _Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour errra ev nt
r`-A ,
,approximately i Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard:
Was any seepage observed froffa the lagoou�s)? Yes or iVo Was any erosion obser�se�? Y r io
Is.adequam land available for spray'? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crap(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
.,e. a it al waste stockptIed within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strearn? Yes or No
a;vrnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS iMap Biir Line'? Yes or No
ardmal waste discharged into waters of the stare by inan-Evade ditch, flushing systein, or ocher
:imi!ar man-tnadc± deNices'' Yes nor No Jf Yes, Please Explairi.
�cs Mu facility maincain adequate waste manaserucnt records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on a-pccific acrr_age with cover cro 1? Yes No
.1d �tio al Cornments: } C3� % 1 i to -I
t i -
S i gna tur'e
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Aitachmems if.Ne6ded.
TOTAL P . �r2
Bllo.��nni� ���4P.nc- u5��

w
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 1, 1995
M E-M O R A N D U M
To: Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Through: Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Judy Garrett *•
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
From: Ted Cashion
Environmental Chemist J
Eric Fleek�
Environmental Technici
Subject: Loss of Deemed Permitted Status
Clover M Farms, Inc. - Conetoe Farm
N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Registration # 33-52
Attached is a proposed loss of deemed permitted status letter for
review. Also attached is a copy of the August 9, 1995 inspection
letter sent to R.H. Mohesky, and their August 10, 1995 response.
A pipe was found in the dam of the lagoon, discharging to a
drainage.ditch leading to surface waters of the State.
We recommend that this letter be presented to the Director for
signature as soon as possible. An enforcement action for the pipe
in the dam will be forwarded to you in a few days.
If questions please call.
h:\animal\mohesky.mem

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1YA
Division of Environmental Management
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ED L H N F�
A, Preston Howard, Jr., RE„ Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Subject: LOSS OF DEEMED PERMITTED STATUS
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
As Per 15A NCAC 211 .0217(a)(1)
Clover M Farms, Inc. - N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr.. Mohesky :
Animal operations in the State have been deemed permitted by the
Division of Environmental Management in accordance with Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual nondischarge
permit is not required if certain criteria are met. A major requirement to be
deemed permitted is that there must not be a discharge of any wastewater from
the operation to the waters of the State.
During an inspection of your swine operation facility located on NC 42
north of Conetoe, on July 27, 1995 a pipe was observed in the dam of the lagoon.
A followup inspection on August 4, 1995 showed this pipe discharging to surface
waters of the State. This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and notification
that your animal operation has been found discharging wastewater to the surface
waters of the State and is therefore no longer deemed permitted as a nondischarge
facility under 15A NCAC 211 .0217. Therefore the existing wastewater treatment
system serving your animal operation is currently being operated without a permit
as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
If you wish to be reconsidered for coverage by the deemed permitted
provision of the Rule, you must: 1)1mmediately eliminate the discharge of
wastewater; 2)make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future
discharges; 3) send in an approved animal waste management plan by completing
the attached certification form. This form and a copy of your plan must be
returned to:
P.O. Box 29535, Raieigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equol Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Mohesky
Page 2
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will
collect, store, treat and land apply your animal waste to the land in an
environmentally acceptable manner. To assist you in the development of this plan
and to provide the required certification that the plan is acceptable, you should
contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation
District, the USDA Soil Conservation Service, or the North Carolina Cooperative
Extension Service.
If we have not received the requested certification within 60 days of receipt
of this letter or if there are additional discharges to the surface water, a civil
penalty of up to $10,000 may be assessed and you may be required to apply for an
individual nondischarge permit from the Division. This permit, if issued, will
contain monitoring and reporting requirements determined to be necessary by the
Division.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to
contact either Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Raleigh
Region at 919-571-4700 or Dianne Williams Wilburn at [phone], ext. 232.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: Judy Garrett
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Edgecombe County Health Department
Planning Branch
Operations Branch
h :1 animal\ mohesky . idp

16
SEND9R,­,7.-,
ir: Complete ftern and)or 2 for additional services.,
_Cornplets,
r
I also wish.. to receive the
taqfs'3 , d4s i b,
Jollowing, T ry seCes for an'extra
'Q
rV_
r your narns and address on the reverse: of this form s6.that 'we can
­� 1­ ­ '. ; , :.. ­­
idyo�u.
�
, return this card , .. . ,
"AD"@.r'A't't*6h'tWs form to the "m of the mallplace, or on the back It spaC6
.�it _ , . . .1 - -
. -❑.
U) J
0, -does not P&Ti ,.
Reftipt Raqu's'stiad" an the rnallpiece below the irScI..number .
. 1. ;" "; '.. .
"O.Resiricte , d ellver�`,.•'� D
7:TfiqRst,urn Rscelp� will show to whorri the article was delivered end the date
delivered.
r ea Consult postmast r for f
IUD
0 1
`3 ArtiCle Addressed to:
'R H Mobesky
48.'Article Number--- ----
E
9E
'215
.4b. 'Servjce Type
ou 1`14_jkii�ed ❑:16SU'red
!.-.0- B o x
Co
arpsburg', NC-
twc "O'COD
S
:*us
.27878
N 0 R ".'-f 6 r 'E n.1 F6 i 'C' E� M e ai 06
[j­lkk6rh'heceipt for
Merchandige
z
Y. F.:/: /T..'C.. [K S Aug
Dellvery_`�
-0
C:
_
1122
5.,,:Sighature (Addressee)
ssea's Address.(Only if requested
8;
76\V
W
6. S, gient)
I urG
PS Form` 1 , December 1991 *U,S. QP0. 1003--M-714 MESTIC ROURN RECEIPT

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 9, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farm
P.O. Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Subject; NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Clover M Farm - N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
During an inspection of your swine operation facility
located on NC 42 east of Conetoe, on July 27, 1995 a pipe was
observed in the dam of the lagoon. A followup inspection on
August 4, 1995 showed this pipe discharging to surface waters of
the State. This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and
notification that your animal operation has been found
discharging wastewater to the surface waters of the State. North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 requires that a permit must be
secured from this Division prior to such discharges. Therefore
the existing wastewater treatment system serving your animal
operation is currently being operated without a permit as
required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
You are also being notified that this office is
considering making a recommendation for an enforcement action to
the Director of the Division for the discharge to surface waters.
If you have justification that this violation was caused by
events or circumstances beyond your control, you must reply in
writing to this office within ten (10) days after the receipt of
this Notice. Your justification will be reviewed and forwarded
to the Director for his consideration. In the absence of such
justification, the Director shall proceed with the recommendation
for enforcement.
Animal.operations in the State have been deemed permitted
by the Division in accordance with Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual
nondischarge permit is not required if certain criteria are met.
3800 Barrett Drive, suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer W%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Mohesky
August 9, 1995
Page 2
A major requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not
be a discharge of any wastewater from the operation to the waters
of the State. Due to the discharge observed on August 4, 1995,
this office will also recommend to the Director that the deemed
permitted status of this facility be revoked.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do
not hesitate to contact either Eric Fleek or Ted Cashion at 919-
571-4700.
Sincerely,
S
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Edgecombe County Health Department
Facilities Assessment Unit
h :1 animal \ mohesky. . ree

WALTER L: HINSON, P.A.
Walter L. Hinson ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Anna G. Brake 2401-G Wooten Boulevard
Post Office Box 7479
Wilson, North Carolina 27895-7479
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile-. [phone]
August 10, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resource
3800 Barrett Dr., Suite 101
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Re: Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Notice of Violation
Clover M Farm- N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
We represent R. H. and Shirley Mohesky and they have requested that we respond to your letter
of August 9, 1995. Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky purchased the farm in March, 1990. The hog facility
including the lagoon in question was existing on the property at the time of the purchase. The
Moheskys were not aware of the drain pipe in question at the time of the purchase. During the
period since they have taken title to the property they have upgraded the facilities and
continuously attempted to operate the farm in a ma mer that complies with all current governing
regulations and good stewardship.
The first awareness that Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky had of the drain pipe was when it was brought to
their attention by the media. Apparently it was located by someone from your office during a
routine inspection. Based on the investigation of our clients, at the time the drain pipe was placed
in the lagoon it did not violate any governing regulations. At that time such construction was
acceptable and a common practice. The pipe was located in an area that was not readily
accessible. It was hidden by the natural vegetation of the area including grass and shrubbery -like
overgrowth. Had Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky been aware of the pipe they would have immediately
corrected the problem.

Mr. Kenneth Schuster
August 10, 1995
Page 2
In fact, the Moheskys were not aware of the situation until Friday, August 4, 1995. The
following day, on what is normally a non -business day, our clients had located a contractor. The
pipe was immediately removed and the lagoon was repaired in a workmanlike manner. It now
conforms to all regulatory requirements.
It would appear that any discharges have been nominal at most. An inspection of the immediate
area of the discharge and the general area down stream from the discharge indicates that there
have been no resulting damages.
Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky have been farm operators all of their adult lives. Mr. Mohesky­ was
on a dairy farm and his education and professional career have been in agriculture. They have
enjoyed a reputation as responsible citizens and individuals who are concerned about their
community. Any violation of the North Carolina General Statutes was unintentional and has been
corrected. We believe your review of the facts and the circumstances of this incident together
with the prompt response of Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky justify a determination that no enforcement
action is justified. We stand ready to provide you with any additional information you may �need
or to otherwise cooperate with your office.
Sincerely
n
WLFVtc
cc: Mr. and Mrs. R. H. Mohesky

�1�� .�
w,
,.
fr
.y }
.. ��
.'. .f'
�
✓��
� %� '
-�;;� �. . -
_ .fir--Y'�
�
if ;�� y+ �+i 1�,1,r y f ,�
�'
�
_ ! i _ ...ems
. � ri
- ;� � r
,, ._� •.
�
•
t
- f s .-�
f �
_ -3
�
•!
y
_
1�
I
- �
:�.�".`
r-_ -
�i� y �
- - may,` T r,�
;I
,_
'}
l.�
r
' � �r�:.
�s; �,•
.
4�,?�
.
' ��
I�,' '-�
i� �I `T
y , i
i �� I ;.
7
:�
.1 .I
i

f�„�� VY
pane}.1
a�9a4 ' os
r
� � ��/% a y-� •, � �a���,,, �(I{7^ir! a r� r,r/-,aUuQ�
/
c�-, i+�M a0,(�
J
a�� �� f � I 1
f 64
/ a+��( Nr� f'HnO.rS����9Gr1 ar f`
�a�n�✓tG�u+ja4ra�f
y�,na ya,�`1D 2�a19U"lw�[J
+
a�l
14
�o

v Lo�Crime JC I
e to w, k e
0Dve-
NI

WALTER L. HINSON, P.A.
Walter L. Hinson ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Anna G. Brake 2401-0 Wooten Boulevard
Post Office Box 7479
Wilson, North Carolina 27895-7479
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
August 10, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resource
3800 Barrett Dr., Suite 101
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Re: Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Notice of Violation
Clover M Farm- N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
{ AUG 141995
We represent R. H. and Shirley Mohesky and they have requested that we respond to your letter
of August 9, 1995. Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky purchased the farm in March, 1990. The hog facility
including the lagoon in question was existing on the property at the time of the purchase. The
Moheskys were not aware of the drain pipe in question at the time of the purchase. During the
period since they have taken title to the property they have upgraded the facilities and
continuously attempted to operate the farm in a manner that complies with all current governing
regulations and good stewardship.
The first awareness that Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky had of the drain pipe was when it was brought to
their attention by the media. Apparently it was located by someone from your office during a
routine inspection. Based on the investigation of our clients, at the time the drain pipe was placed
in the lagoon it did not violate any governing regulations. At that time such construction was
acceptable and a common practice. The pipe was located in an area that was not readily
accessible. It was hidden by the natural vegetation of the area including grass and shrubbery -like
overgrowth. Had Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky been aware of the pipe they would have immediately
corrected the problem.

Mr. Kenneth Schuster
August 10, 1995
Page 2
In fact, the Moheskys were not aware of the situation until Friday, August 4, 1995. The
following day, on what is normally a non -business day, our clients had located a contractor. The
pipe was immediately removed and the lagoon was repaired in a workmanlike manner. It now
conforms to all regulatory requirements.
It would appear that any discharges have been nominal at most. An inspection of the immediate
area of the discharge and the general area down stream from the discharge indicates that there
have been no resulting damages.
Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky have been farm operators all of their adult lives. Mr. Mohesky was raised
on a dairy farm and his education and professional career have been in agriculture. They have
enjoyed a reputation as responsible citizens and individuals who are concerned about their
community. Any violation of the North Carolina General Statutes was unintentional and has been
corrected. We believe your review of the facts and the circumstances of this incident together
with the prompt response of Mr. and Mrs. Mohesky justify a determination that no enforcement
action is justified. We stand ready to provide you with any additional information you may need
or to otherwise cooperate with your office.
Sincerely
1. r
n
AY"M M
cc: Mr. and Mrs. R. H. Mohesky

..,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
A4 t*o
�k )&
[DEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 9, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.H. Mohesky
Clover M Farm
P.Q. Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Subject: NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Clover M Farm - N.C. 42 East of Conetoe
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Mohesky:
During an inspection of your swine operation facility
located on NC 42 east of Conetoe, on July 27, 1995 a pipe was
observed in the dam of the lagoon. A followup inspection on
August 4, 1995 showed this pipe discharging to surface waters of
the State. This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and
notification that your animal operation has been found
discharging wastewater to the surface waters of the State. North -
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 requires that a permit must be
secured from this Division prior to such discharges. Therefore
the existing wastewater treatment system serving your animal
operation is currently being operated without a permit as
required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
You are also being notified that this office is
considering mak'ng a recommendation for an enforcement action to
the Director of the Division for the discharge to surface waters.
If you have justification that this violation was caused by
events or circumstances beyond your control, you must reply in
writing to this office within ten (10) days after the receipt of
this Notice. Your justification will be reviewed and forwarded
to the Director for his consideration. In the absence of such
justification, the Director shall proceed with the recommendation
for enforcement.
Animal operations in the State have been deemed permitted
by the Division in accordance with Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual
nondischarge permit is not required if certain criteria are -met.
38M Barren Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

'81'. .
Mr. Mohesky
August 9, 1995
Page 2
A major requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not
be a discharge of any wastewater from the operation to the waters
of the'State. Due to the discharge observed on August 4, 1995,
this office will also recommend to the Director that the deemed
permitted status of this facility be revoked.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do
not hesitate to contact either Eric Fleek or Ted Cashion at 919-
571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Edgecombe County Health Department
Facilities Assessment Unit
h: \animal\ mohesky. rec
r.

DEM/RRO
95/8/7
Memorandum: R.H. Mohesky Facility Inspection/ NC 42/Edgecombe Co.
This past Friday (95/8/4) a R. H. Mohesky hog operation near
Conetoe in Edgecombe county was inspected. The findings of that
inspection are as follows:
1) Manmade conveyance from lagoon to drainage ditch. The pipe was
black and appeared to be plastic'. Pipe was seen on both sides of
the lagoon wall and was slightly below water level on both sides.
2) The receiving ditch was approx. 3.5=4 .5 ft.. wide and was holding
what appeared to be standing wastewater. The ditch was followed -for
approximately 400 yards, its entire, length containing standing
wastewater.
3) After -the approx. 400 yards had been traveled along the ditch,
a nearby canal was observed. This canal was approx. 25-30 ft. wide
and directly fed into the Conetoe Creek which was .75-1 mile away.
4) Between the ditch and the canal was a narrow (approx 15 ft-.
wide) strip of field. Upon close examination, it was determined
that the water from the ditch was in contact with the canal water
via a buried pipe. Water levels of both the ditch and canal were
too high to directly• observe this pipe. However, it was found by
probing beneath the water'with a soil auger and being able to hear
the two surfaces strike.

• JUL-14--1995 15: ?s FROM DEM WATER CIUAL 1 TY SECT 1 iJN TO
FcF�1 P . 02/02
Site Requires .Immediate AtTcn!2on
Facility No.
DfVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ? ,4 75 , 1995
TiFne:._ 1 0 0 C
Farm Name/Owner: UGVE i
Mailing Address:
County;
Integrator.
On Site Re -presentative:
Physical Address/Location:
�25
Phone:
of
Type of Operation: Swine �� Poultry Cattle �,_� q� C
Design Capacity: 40 G Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the animal Wasre Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of l Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (Yee or(R) Actual Freeboard: —L—Fc. ___L .inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or To Was any emsion obs ed? Yes or zo
Is adequate land available for spray'? Yes or Is the cover crop adequate? Yes No
Crop(s)being(s) ��� uti� li:
C-,(JED
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback eriteria'1 200 Feet from Dwellings. Y���. or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes r No
--`)c a^imal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
: dinal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Luce' Yes or No��
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by tnan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
-dmi;a_r man-made delrices' Y,e or No if Y ws, Please ExplSiTt.
r►„c1 �hc:.facility maintain adequate waste mastagerocnt Tecords (volumes of rzianure. land a plied
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes o No WPAVA v
Additional Comments: I JL Ir/Yrs mist _ �[�Ll �/�'/C C.P. �( (5 C.kWi A G �+a CP-
aLA/( v / Ci 1)L/P
C
I=WWI L.9=WV
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
Q0 �j /� � / TL#TFL P .02

]'UL-14-1995 15 ; 2a FROM DEN WATER CiUAL [ TY SECT [ uN Tu
RRO P.02/ 2
Site Rewires Immediate..Agtnion- eS
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN-F
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SIT& VISITATION RECORD
.DATE:ua 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: C
Mailing Address -
County:
Integrator ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —_ _— Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: _ a .h� J71 .001J.-1C4e_—
Type of Operation: Swine %L Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certi.fcation Number: ACNEW
Ladtude: . ` e Longitude: J�� ' 66 04 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Des the .Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foor + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: c. 0 Inc es
,,��yy� Ole
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion ob6s ' e�es No
Is adequate land available for spray'? es or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: Ll
rl
Doer the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Ye or -No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
a^irnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of LJSGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
animal waste land applied. or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS iViap Blue Line'? Yes or No
',: ani.mal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, tlusbing systein, or usher
,imi;ar man-made deNices'? Yes or No .Li Y;;s, Please E:cplairt. Ae be/v&" %
talc f:w ity maintain adequate Waste niatiagerncnr records (volumes of manure, land applied.
SPraY i.rn,-aced on specific ac i:4ge with cover crop)? Yes or No
Ito Oa 14 %a 0 0%C t Q� -6 h rfi `'� 0 XZ J 0 i'
�.� I:•: SInarwe
r" g
cc: Fa.ciliV Assessrnent Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL F.e2

Ted C $1�v Rio . . rv�h�s av
REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPE `TONS CEC�9�
�_
Department of Environment, Health and Natural. resources Division
cn
Division of Environmental. Management
Water Quality Section c
If the animal waste management system For your feedlot o9�c s
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by. December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c), in order to be
deemed permitted by -OEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: - r`}hJ�t -
Mailing Address:
Address:
County:
Owner(s) Nam
Manager(s) N
Lessee Name;
Farm Location (Be as specific as
m}lepost, etc.)-
Latitude/Longitude if known:
ossible: road names, direction
Design capacity of animal w ste manag
of confined ani al(s)):
Average .animal population on the �f�rm
raised) : ' 2 �. a:� S , �rA
nt system (NugLber and type
20f.v 1 G✓: ff,
er and type of animals)
Year Production Began: 1990 ASCS Tract No.: _41& -Z 2b3 y7
Type of Waste Managem nt System Used:
Acres Available for Land App;ication of Waste:
Owner (s) Signature (s) :
,Gi
TE:/
DATE:
G

OPERATIONS BRANCH -- WQ Fax:[phone]
� l rC.df t_.CLS Y�+� n�Y � � • �
U.
Aug 7 '95 10:45
J_
P. O1./oi
5
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural $E
Division of Environmental Management z
Water Quality Section c
ON DkC �y
sources 9
1f the animal waste management system for your feedlot o" s
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by, OEM. Please print clearly.
12
Farm Name: �nY� IZ f3i�S'1'1S 1JG
Mailing Address:
County:
Owner (s) Nam
Manager (s) N
Lessee Name:
Fai7m Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direct -ion
m Iepost, etc.1 4 -g= ��X _ a --/,-�r u
.7!�; �i1,...r ;,— ice/ _ '.'..^ r Z-41ti1 a` !-Ao� P^ --d ,,.YL
Lat i.t ude/Longitude it' known:
Oesi,3n capacity of animal w ste manage nt system (Nu -ber and type -
of
ccnf.i,ned animal (s) ) =— -- f. ��� f �,.i �'
Av+ rage arjima1 :ropul
r and type of ar.lrnaI (~;
-4;:L a k0
Year Production Began: ! q90 ASCS Tract, No.: y�
Type of Waste Mailayempt Systel
Li-f-
Qh,i
Acres Available for Land Application of Waste:_ I'7'-
Ownrrr (sl :
DATE

March 27, 2003
R.H. Mohesky
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Re: Conetoe Farm
Permit Rescission
Permit # AWS330052
Dear R.H. Mohesky,
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Thank you for participating in the floodplain buyout program. Permit number
AWS330052 has been rescinded because the farm has been bought out and the lagoon has been
closed. You should no longer receive invoices for your annual permit fee but if you do, please
contact me at [phone], ext. 571 or Sue Homewood at [phone], ext. 502.
cc: Sue Homewood
Fran McPherson
Farm file #33-52
Rafe igh`egon al Offic e
Central Files
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
NCDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affimtative Action Employer
50% recycled110% post -consumer paper
http✓/h2o. enr. state.nc. us

of Visit Q'Compl!prCe Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit (>,Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other I ❑ Denied Access
Fa 'sty Number
5 2fDate of Visit:
ermitted 13 Certified J© Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: ... ��^...5�1 4..........J.......................................................
Owner Name:
T=—t Time: s S
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County:
PhoneNo:................................................................................»:.
FacilityContact: .....................:........................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .............................................................
Onsite Representative: ..................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... .....
Location of Farm:
....... Integrator: ........................................................................
Operator Certification Number:. .........................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 +6 Longitude s 4 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) []Yes N
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes pdV0
Waste Collection & Treatment 77
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Ye ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
L + -
Identifier: ................'...........................3L............................................................................................................................
................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on buck

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes EJ N
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level �,�
elevation markings? ❑Yes l4o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type aeJ CA o Q 9-,-
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? / _
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes [�W
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 0
4.0019001WO 00154000 wire WOO 46fig 01s: VISA; • :160 3411 PCOVe 00 016� $r• :
corresV6fidei> & abouti this visit: ::::...:::::: ::::........ • .........
"v'h Fi 1 - i 1'
� drawangs;oifacaLty,to better exphrin s�tuatioas ,(use additional pages as neessary):, ,, t}��;� �;�,� ,��a��p t� �rF; �: f�=��.f✓ :i="-� . +iw=
I 1 �, g n �: ,+j,t ri {ems
Reviewer/Inspector Name Z E �� ✓ €f,. r�!�!(13 .'[`�} [ f =E�E(`a _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Facility Number: �1 — .S"Z Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes VNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? El a
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes o
Additional.Comments: an or° rawings:.
AL
5/00