Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout330047_PERMIT FILE_20171231State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Joe Webb Sunny -Brook Farm Rt 1 Box 320 Pinetops NC 27864 Dear Joe Webb: NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND_NAT.LIRAL_RE$OLJRCES April 27, 1998 APR 29 i DERNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE Subject: Removal of Registration Facility Number 33-47 Edgecombe County This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not require registration for a certified animal waste management plan. Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day. Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits Iisted below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans are as follows: Swine 250 Confined Cattle 100 Horses 75 Sheep 1,000 Poultry with a li uid wastes stem 30,000 If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our staff at (919) 733-5083 ext 57 L Sincerely, U i A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919.715.6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper t State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Joe Webb Sunny -Brook Farm Rt 1 Box 320 Pinetops NC 27864 Dear Joe Webb: 1 � � NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES February 11, 1998 Subject: Request for Status Update Certified.Animal Waste Management Plan Sunny -Brook Farm Facility Number: 33-47 Edgecombe County In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997. This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter. Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid permit. N.C. G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues. As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5 0 % recycled110% post -consumer paper Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are: 100 head of cattle 75 horses 250 s Aine 1000 sheep 30,000 birds with a liquid system Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A). Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address: Attn: Shannon Langley Division of Water Quality P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh NC 27626-0535 Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance. Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at (919) 733-5083 ext. 581. Sincerely, A. Preston Howard, . cc: Facility File -- Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit DWQ Regional Office Shannon Langley Central Files P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10 % post -consumer paper Total Time (in fraction of hours O Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review ❑ Certified ❑ Permitted lor Inspection (includes travel and processing) "Operational Date Last Operated: ..... 1.9.Q -&............................................................................................................................ Farm Name:. l.:L...h...n.:.........l�. Ley .!.a- .................................. County:_t!.....��...fr�7xt..�7_.Q................ _..................... Land Owner Name: .....1..L`�......... f8 k.1............................................ _................. , Phone No: .....L.L..J...... �� �. � 7� .................................................. Facility Conctact:...... —:<..._Lz. e l.............................. Title: Zr e! ;� ..................... Phone No: .... _................................. _................. Mailing Address: ... rf.%.._................ (..P...i....... Z:fi............. ,C...'..:!..a..S..!:..5............!.Y.- .......... 2..�...��...._............... , .......... r^ C3 t� ✓• �l- ................ Onsite Representative: ,.�? ::] w� / _/.............................................................................._...... Integrator: ..... .......... ...................................................................... Certified Operator: ..........`��••••••.................................................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..................................... _.., Location of Farm: =• Longitude =• =, = ,. General I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0<0 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes � N/o 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El M< 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?, Continued on back " _ _ ., aTlF ��'r -- �,x � --Cy-- as.a•tiV7rygJTfr-.�v1T ,. .. 'R'jv-.r.i..%��4w -ear .r .... .. r. .. � ..-.q -. -�-ra - - . r �aZilitj�\umGer: � —(,� 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 13'No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? M-Pl'" ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes O'No Structures (Lagoons and/or floldin fonds 9. 1s storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? '' ❑ Yes ❑ No Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ............................................ ❑ Yes INNo El Yes. E) No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes Q•No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate,puublic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type ......��Y'.! .3...........�` '... 5 . -� e................................................................................................................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For Certified Facilities On] 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? i ❑ Yes 0'No ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ED No ❑ Yes EI-90 ❑ Yes ONO ❑ Yes ['KO ❑ Yes i 0,No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit Date: 4/30/97 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality .James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Joe Webb Sunny -Brook Farm ;. Rt 1 Box 320,,:, Pinetops NC 27864 Dear Mr. Webb: �EHNR APR -- 7 1 9T SUBJECT: Notice of Violation Designation of Operator in Charge Sunny-Brook:Farm Facility Number 33--47 Edgecombe County You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office. For your convenience we are, sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified operator. Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997. If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at (919)733-0026. Sincerely, 1. t- o�' for Steve W. Tedder, Chief, Water Quality Section bb/awdesletl cc: Raleigh Regional Office Facility File Enclosure P.O. Box 29535, N'*f FAX 919-733-2496 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmotive Action Employer Telephone 919-733-7015 _ 50% recycles/ 1 T1. post -consumer paper Facility Number Date of Inspection Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit ex:L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Sent on Review Farm Status: ( P ❑ Certified- ❑ Permitted I or Inspection (includes travel and processini ofOperatio/n�al Date Last Operated: ..... 19..1. ........... _..... _.................................................... __...... _..... _....... ......... _................. Farm Name: SLILh.f!..:j...... // .//....... �A'L..�r. ................................., County:...3 1—�Ct1.Gl..t.............,....................... Land Owner Name:... J _Q_.r......._4 ¢,fZ. ^� /......._........_................._........_............... Phone No:........................................................................... Facility Conctact:....ndzV ......�C.�.p�� L.............................. Title: ................ _........ Phone No: .... _...... _.................. _........ _.............. MailingAddress: ._Jt�• -Z..............L..0.�......J ............ :. !.a .s......._...........................................KC'1ii...w�._l_............... , .......................... OnsiteRepresentative: .P.......... _..... __......................................................................_......, Integrator:........._...._........................................ Certified Operator: ........... .......................... .............................. _...... _........ _............ Operator Certification Number:........................................., Location of Farm: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................_.................._ 4 ........................................ _............... _................................................ ..... _....... _....................................................................................................... ........................................ , Latitude Longitude �•� �« Venerat I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ONo ❑ Yes ONo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes No Continued on back Facili Number: — 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes , 10 7.. Did the facility fail to have :t certified operator in responsible charge? Yes No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes [❑ !d'No Structures laa oons and/or Holding Ponds 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 ....................................... ............................. I ........ ............. ......... ................ ......... .......................... .... ....................... ............... .............................. ...., 10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes tj No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 12. Do any of the structures need main ten ancelimprovement? ❑ Yes o (if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes . No Waste A ItR catio 14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes 01K (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type ...,.. Y'.11�P.. f............'`.... ............... ...........I...... .................................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes io 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes B No 21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes []; o For Certified Facilities Only 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/inspector Signature: cc: Divisin►r of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit Date: 4/30/97