330040_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
William Dail
W.O. Dail & Sons Inc
Rt 1 Box 390
Tarboro NC 27886
Dear Mr./Mrs. Dail:
A M
KA
wl
DEHNF1
December 19, 1996 Ell C3 fl t f
DEC 3 D i99s
Ut.HNI? RALEIGH
REGIONAL OFFICE
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 33-40
Edgecombe County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's
animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .02I7, and therefore does not require registration
for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the
surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a
waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state
will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below,
you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold
numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff at
[phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,< :�_ �j
(mot �--R(0�-\kQ-��
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cd:_Raleig Water_ Quality1egional_0ffice)
Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • • .
Raleigh Regional Office loaa
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1:3 FE H:N 1=1
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 21, 1995
Mr. William Doil
Route 1, Box 390
Tarboro, North Carolina 27886
Subject: Compliance Inspection
W. O. Doil & Sons, Inc.
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Doil:
On September 13, 1995, Mr. Eric Fleek from this office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This
inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with waste disposal systems.
During the inspection, Mr. Fleek was informed by Mr. William
Doil that the facility had been abandoned since August, 1994.
Further, Mr. Fleek was made aware of the fact that prior to the
August 1994 abandonment, the lagoon was pumped down and the sludge
removed. _These measures took place during March of 1994 and a
maximum of 500 hogs (with fewer animals present towards the August
abandonment date) were kept on site.
Despite these facts, the site inspection revealed that the
lagoon still appeared to be composed largely of animal wastewater
(due to the presence of the aforementioned hogs for 5 months
confinement), and that the freeboard was insufficient in some
places (as low as 12 inches). A properly managed lagoon should have
at least 19 inches of freeboard in your area. As a result, the
following items require action to prevent possible environmental
impacts:
1. Since your facility is no longer operating, we recommend
that the lagoon be satisfactorily closed out to prevent
potential environmental impacts, and to protect you from
liabilities associated with the lagoon. We recommend that the
lagoon be pumped out and sprayed on areas with adequate cover_
crop to take up the nutrients. Spraying may continue as long
as dry conditions permit (no spraying when raining or when
fields are saturated). The wastewater must not be allowed to
reach surface waters.
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

William Doil
W. O. Doil & Sons, Inc.
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
After all liquid and sludge has been pumped out the lagoon
may be left intact to serve as a pond, or the dam may be
broken to prevent accumulation of stormwater.
You are reminded that when spraying wastes onto the land no runoff
of wastes may occur at any time, and that you are liable for any
environmental damage caused by wastewater from the lagoon.
Please notify this office for assistance in planning a proper
close out of the lagoon if necessary. You are also encouraged to
contact the local NRCS office for guidance.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions please call Mr. Fieek at
919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett-N. C. Division of Soil and Water Conservation

i�
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review ,OLagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 6 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: meQ7: Liz �
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: j i / V P 4-1 ( County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address: _
Facility Contact: —
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: &i
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®a ®° .4 Longitude ©' ©, E;D
Design
Current Design "Current Design Current
Swine Capacity
PopulationPoultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity.Population.
❑ Wean to Feeder
JEJ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
I0 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other I
❑ Farrow to Finish
,Total Design Capacity.-
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
JEJ Spray Field Area
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
Held g Ponds >Soltd Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacjs
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? �• L:. n t1j.t• S ---
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes
❑ Yes L�No
❑ Yes No
Yes o
es o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — ri Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
[:]No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reguired_Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [--]No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
kseLdr any�otfer comtnents �� �� { =;
nitnents refer to itestion:# Ex lainan YES answers andlnr an recommendations n
g. , y f!, ( ,. p y) ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Note
X S
/�qr hr- C C. O'C/ C r/-) .I J. /4. G� n-1
Reviewer/Inspector Name `
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 4 / "// d ,Z--
0510310I Continued

V"
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment.
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
�EHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 21, 1995
Mr. William Doil
Route 1, Box 390
Tarboro, North Carolina 27886
Subject: Compliance Inspection
W. 0. Doil & Sons, Inc.
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Doil:
On September 13, 1995, Mr. Eric Fleek from this office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This
inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with waste disposal systems.
During the inspection, Mr. Fleek was informed by Mr. William
Doil that the facility had been abandoned since August, 1994.
Further, Mr. Fleek was made aware of the fact that prior to the
August 1994 abandonment, the lagoon was pumped down and the sludge
removed. These measures took place during March of 1994 and a
maximum of 500 hogs (with fewer animals present towards the August
abandonment date) were kept on site.
Despite these facts, the site inspection revealed that the
lagoon still appeared to be composed largely of animal wastewater
(due to the presence of the aforementioned hogs for 5 months
confinement), and that the freeboard was insufficient in some
places (as low as 12 inches). A properly managed lagoon should have
at least 19 inches of freeboard in your area. As a result, the
following items require action to prevent possible environmental
impacts:
1. Since your facility is no longer operating, we recommend
that the lagoon be satisfactorily closed out to prevent
potential environmental impacts, and to protect you from
liabilities associated with the lagoon. We recommend that the
lagoon be pumped out and sprayed on areas with adequate cover
crop to take up the nutrients. Spraying may continue as long
as dry conditions permit (no spraying when raining or when
fields are saturated). The wastewater must not be allowed to
reach surface waters.
3800 Barrett Ddve, Sulte 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/ 10% post-c onsumer paper

William Doil
W. O. Doil & Sons, Inc.
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
After all liquid and sludge has been pumped out the lagoon
may be left intact to serve as a pond, or the dam may be
broken to prevent accumulation of stormwater.
You are reminded that when spraying wastes onto the land no runoff
of wastes may occur at any time, and that you are liable for any
environmental damage caused by wastewater from the lagoon.
Please notify this office for assistance in planning a proper
close out of the lagoon if necessary. You are also encouraged to
contact the local NRCS office for guidance.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions please call Mr. Rleek at
919-571-4700.
Sincerely
Ju Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett-N. C. Division of Soil and Water Conservation

JUL-14-1995 15.26 FROM DEN LATER QUALITY SECTION TO.
P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate. Artention-
Facility No. 3 s, - ',6
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time: L f v , DC/1 ).L�e7i - I-
� W
farm Narrae/Owner. { 1 � ( `
Mailing Address:
County: _
0 i lw4 n
Integrator_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - — Phone:
On Site Renresentadve: �r Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry. Cattle f
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude:Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
.Dcxs the .A imal Waste Lagoon have sufficiieen�tfreeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxinaately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or V Actual Freeboard: fit. � Inches- _
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Was any erosion observed? Yes or i o
Is adequate land available for spray'? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes -or No
Cmp(s) being utilized:
.. S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum- setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellin or
100 F6evfrom Wells? or No 3
: to animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes- or(No)y?
', ardimal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or. orher
�itni:a_! man-made devices? Yes or � .if Yes, Please Explain.
r.lr>cs tic facility inaintain adequate waste managernern records (volumes of manure; land applied. -
spray irrigated on 5;
Additional Comments:,
with cover cro ): Yes or No
� Ad. , (7,0 dd"e 1,
Vint- I i5•rilr; t I i ,tj n O
TN t:..! T S
560
cc: Facility Assessment Unit �0
W }
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.92