330030_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Feb 10 10 12:08p
p,1
Tarboro Field Office
201 St. Andrew Street
Tarboro NC 27886
252-823-8187 ext. 130
252- i41-7902-FAX
rom the desk of Margaret Knig t
To: Buster Towell
Division of Water Quality
Fax: [phone] Pages: 5 including cover
Phone: [phone] D0 Date: 211 D/2 010
Ree
CC:
Z6i0ud13f
0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment © Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
• Comments:
This is the plan of action for Robert L. Johnson.

Feb 10 1012:08p
p.2
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: ^33 - 30 County: Edgecombe
Facility Name: Johnson Livestock
Certified Operator Name: Lary Johnson Operator ff
t. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Namelidentifier (ID): 1
Spillway (Yes or No): 0
Level (inches): —17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
_X_ Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed. sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information,
Contact and secure appraval from the Division of Water Quality prior to -transfer of waste
to a site not cohered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 2112/2010
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Larry Johnson
Garility CluunarlMananear f nrintl
oA Cover Page
[phone]
Phone:
Date* 2/812010

Feb 10 10 12:09p
0
p.3
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
L TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Sturcture Name/Identifier (ID): Larry Johnson 33 - 30
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19 inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) 1 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 68043.4 ftz
e. line c x line d x 7.48 gallons = 42413.7 gallons
12 ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f.
temporary storage period according to structural design
180
days
g,
volume of waste produced according to structural design
63298.1
ft3
h.
actual waste produced = 1920 current herd# x line g =
44193.6
ft3
2750 certified herd#
i.
volume of wash water according to strucutural design
0
ft3
j.
excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
81410.8
ft3
k.
(lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days =
156587
gallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 3/18/2009 2.6 Ib/1000 gal.
m. (lines e+ K) x line I = 517.401 lb PAN
1000
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24 HR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1

Feb 101012:09p p 4
1. structure 10:
line m = 517.401
2. structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3. structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
5. structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
6. structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1+2+3+4+5+6=
517.401
lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD.
DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD,
o,
tract #
P.
field #
q,
crap
r.
acres
s.
remaining IRR - 2 PAN
balance (lb/acre)
t.
TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR FIELD
(Ibs.) column r x s
U.
application
window'
2012
15
o/s sm gr
7.4
50
370
10/1- 3/31
2012
6
o/s sm gr
5
50
250
10/1 - 3/31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IState current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day draw down period
V. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) =
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
620 Ib/PAN
PA

Feb 1010 12:10p
p,5
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (3D) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
w. Total PAN to be land applied (linen from section ll)
X. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III)
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
517.401 lb. PAN
620 lb. PAN
(102.60) lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. if line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulaton, nerd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new
PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add
these fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be
hauled to another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon
freeboard levels at the receiving facility.
Narrative:
POA (30 Day) 2/21/00 3

q +
DiVisid'n ©f Watee Resiiu`rces"
...,; t�Iw�uHntIIIHH Hlt��ls�§lt I,€ �rrrt�(ltllllill Elul
'
i
11190111ty Nutnber - I
Di sion of;Sall and Water Conserr+atian
0 Other Agencyd
Type of Visit: Com cc Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: = Routine O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral p Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: -2 �1 1_ Arrival Time: Departure Time: �7 County: Region:
Farm Name: I I"Z h Lf +4 Je1%- Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ! ' aad. p,C
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
gn Current
79f• t
F�Pcb"
Design
VIR[ rl",
CurrentDesign
li§:9 ]I v
1 }ly� pd'�I
Curyr�ent
1IIEd`�XliSwine.
city
Pop.
Wet
Poultry
Gapacity�
U26P19IUIHIISEn
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
s 0
iiHll r
13ii}i;lr Nl
EllJlpll itl}Ib#Fd$l#311i1
EE 16 €III
lH 1
INk� M111lf[
iff I
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
W an to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
���
i��
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current+
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D Poult .
Ca ae
�Po� .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other,
Turkey Puults
Other
Other
NipFs€.€Ek€s€!f!€!
t
I
€
€?€>€�t€pptlinn.wNt:pRl€SnidlillYlmfiiu
lVK3kilAlh`MalYrw.YUWgheiy€q�€%llu.iilMlWfMSiF.t3Yff>iEi3i�l!!N!i!ul.l.ux................ I
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
rN
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
90106
oNA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214,12015 Continued

Facility .Number: - ?,A Date of Inspection: . 2
.�,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
[] Yes
NA
rNo
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a4 el' o� Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ YesZNo
NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No [] NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta rest, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): r $ part C1 `
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0Yes
V ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] Yes
VNoNA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
NA
[] NE
18. Is there,a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Re aired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ YesgNo
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the a ro riate box
pp p
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA [] NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continues!

F'aeili Number: - Date of Inspection: —2-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�N ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
[j NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Ni
Comments ■!r'efe"r`E:to+(yy°uestion'i#l■ Ez'"lain"any.'-YES,a'nswersi'and/or(lanY°'additioral'lrecommendation's%'r°an 1,'other"comments:{``tir I+II ji ,;$`-1i i
a6.. Q. 1. \Ei€'-5-11.1i "il illlll .II.' o t:, III'IIEYif`ei I.I� f f' PIE�P 51adl +f. E€:.
,ti ,€ I' f.l.k:!;,ligl�l,l.1:3€�3,,L I,., ve.�ll . II'Qil.� .<tiI!II".ftE,l.l !, .. I,.dNt. Nt
d.rawrngs,o%iailatyi to. better.,ex .lain! s>tuatiolns (use ,add�tJonaf ages as; necessa _ry),Ilt
Il a ill !il 1E..
orb-��.,�
5 urn �
v`
C� �
o
ReviewerAnspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: s4iw -
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 9 ' q sac?
Date: Y 2 I
21412015

5,-
(Type of Visit: .0 Co ance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergenev O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
i jj J %
Farm Name: [?J✓� J� n Itw f&1 Oner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: &%'4-2i
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Phone:
Phone: _
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capcity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
DairyHeifer
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
D . P■aultr,
Design
Ca acit
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
P■o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Pullets
keys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? /
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesrN
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

1FAcilit
y N mbar: - Date of Inspection: r
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes��No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IN ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes V A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any -YES answers and/or any additional recommend466s or any other comments: `
Use drawings of facility .to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
/) �,3 � 2-61 6
��ti%� 5�rr'r2y
vo
cv 59
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
i?_'! —/�
r a-
( 11 di Fps
Aq5 - zoa-�
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �j , jPiJ� ((�f,� P Date:
r—
Page 3 of 3 21412015

lFacility Number: - Date of Inspection:
If
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): f/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No .❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
s
12. Crop Type(s): . SC49- A; 4?-rAA7,,rr
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ,EnXb ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes L] No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes J `VU ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesjNo 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code.
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiFNo
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? El❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

c
Type of Visit: CO ConwHance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: 1 46 �:M County:
Farm Name: 'T_ 60�iOwner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �L `fir Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design
Current
Design
Current Design C►urgent
Swine Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry CapacityCattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to FeederL
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . Poultry,Ca aci
Layers
Po Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
EIFPNon-Layers
Beef Feeder
BoarsH
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Qther
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesVNoE]
A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
No
— NA ❑ NE
O ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Observed Freeboard (in): 02 p t.,1311
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C'No 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN M PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �"� st",l� . �� gip_& 'V4-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes N
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 7] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [D Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes g24No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

1.
Facili Number: -3 113ate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �� No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments refer to question # •°Ex lainTan �YES'answers�andlor an additional recoinmeridations'o>•an other.comments:; 'I"
Use drawings of facility to better explain'situations (use additional pages as necessary).
2 - rR -r- is _#-/
0 55
r-;,- -3 ez,--
ct�-L b r e!94 t- P�'-- i - Zt - t 1/
3- Zfrr V
�� �e S c` ��•a,• zo i �
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
A�nv���
22 �^ �—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��]G�.S' V �� �a-tj -0-- L
Page 3 of 3,
Phone:
Date: 5- iC
21412014

W,
jType of Visit: rQ Compl' nspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
(Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access }[
Date of Visit: [ l Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: fgtnr ,/ —_ _ ��-+ Jz Q-N �.— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
r , Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: �l
Back-up Operator:
Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: �n 6r ­.x
Certification Number:
Certification Number: '
Longitude:
Region:
De11,s1114ign
Current
MMURIVA.IIDesign
t
ry
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Pop.
lt.ry
Capacity
Pap.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La erI
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
IQ). P._ouitr,
Ca acit
P,o ,.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
I
Il'uIlets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No _ ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesF0_
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

' I
lFaellity Nuntber: - 3 Date of Inspection: X13( L-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
�3
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
�r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
0 Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes WNo
; ❑ ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CropWindow❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r in, 4'1
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
1� 0 NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

f � ,
Facili Number: - -3 jDate of Inspection: j
r
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[7 s10 ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(cs) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
Vo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
a<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments, (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinss of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
ra L t'b � --� P 20-t <(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: % ! �- L/
Date:
21412011

Date of Visit: �� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �} jr�J�,,(a„r— �y� rtS bi+ ilei+��. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: /% I'� Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Drt Poult . Ca aci Po
La ers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
jBeefFeeder
Boars
1pullets
I Beef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream lml)acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes gNo 0 NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesWNo[:]
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Nu3nber: - ,3 a Date of Inspection: -3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
dNo NA ❑ NE
2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 0 NA
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �Noo NA
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �jrNo NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 0 3 P'►—n, t' .1,o
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
D NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
l6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No -❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
ffNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectirNo
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

F701ity NUmber: jDate of Inspection: 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �l "' NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No A NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems; over -application)
3 t. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
� Z
ow ( Y
paka/�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
- Z'g� / L/ olL
?_ze�-iy
i —U-f V
�-zl--( `j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1•� e S'�'1'� -t'
Page 3 of 3
Phone: `J v -7-0 t>
Date:
21412011

FE
Type of Visit: Co nee Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Ememency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ILCi}- — r. p.� fir} (2- �_- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ( & Qt tL-
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop..
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
ceder to Finish
)L
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. Youltr. Ca ci I?,o Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [—]Yes: No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [-]Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d: Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesFNo
[] NA [3 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes C-oro NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes �No[] NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): it .�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes OeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes <No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑t Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): lgsCA, 130—c- e^ +� G' 4 ,T''r,S'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[:]Yes N
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Q/ NN
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes rNA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
'.❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements
Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
IV
❑ Waste Transfers
Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

•
Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
PNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or.any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessar }: P: _43
7 I
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: )If - q 2 L"
4 i-ifi?z e Grp i f Date: f V
21412011

for Visit: (0 Routine U Complaint
rw v arrucrure r vaivanon �,.J i ecnmcai zLssisrance
0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timer Departure Time: Q County:
Farm Name: �[��,�j ►�Is'n Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
r r
Onsite Representative: } ✓r 4ji *--i o A.,, —Integrator: )K 1 r7 T
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry amity Pap.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
SIR
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean Design C•nrrent
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr, Pooutt , _Ca aci Pao ,
Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
ayers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ZNO NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? i
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑YesrNoo
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: 3 -^3 tj Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
o NA ❑ NE
No Q NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta neat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
M No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 1bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
<NoE]NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Mo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
[] NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers j ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspecti&No
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA [3NE,
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 33- Date of Inspection: 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
O o ❑ NA
0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[—]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
/No
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
eo'o NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ YesjNcoj)/[:]
NA
❑ NE
Comments to question #); Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or. any other comments g
Use drawings of facility.to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessa.ty):,
<
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: / ! l' y z o ()
Date: -S Of
21412011

3r2z(t-2--
Type of Visit: 14 Cance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: }} Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: P1 Ys Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: �� r
Title:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Ca P c ty Pop.
CattleM(. MPop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Daia Calf
Feeder to Finish
fi 3
;` "
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P,oult .
Design Current
(Gtea paci P.a P.
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
I
jBeef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: 3 112, t
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): [�J
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑"Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): k3Q r M h,J_ 114 _S A r_ r4 i •� _.,. _
IF
13. Soil Type(s): .
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes RI o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No. ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �rNo
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili NuMber: - Date of Inspection: / 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Vo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[—]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to,question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any, additional recommendations or;any other comments:
Use 'draiwings of facility to better explain situations`(use additional pages as necessary). x, :, , r
5/ CA 0 _r /V P
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 77 I L1 Z 0 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1� i V w C L I-
Page 3 of 3
Date: J ! ou �-
2/4/2011

Ibl [Q
19
Type of Visit (j C pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:! Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: L
h I 063yn, Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:: /
Certified Operator: Lftr`3 ekkn=50
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ e = I Longitude: = ° = , = "
Design Current
Swine CapacityPopulation
Wet Poultry
Design C►urrent
Capacity Population
Design Current
apacLty Population
E]WeanjeFinish
❑ Layer
❑ Daia Cow
❑ an to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑Turke Puults
❑ Other
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b..Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
[Dyes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o []NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No JZI NA, ❑ NE
❑ Yes 17A UNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No El NA [-INE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: j
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z f t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
No NA [INE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes
0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
r
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
✓ 1
12. Crop type(s)r �t,pc�/ rM� dlGi
13. Soil type(s)
l
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
V❑ NA ❑ NE
7N ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer toquestion :#). ExplaananyYES answers and/or any: recommendations or any other comments,,
3Use drawings of facility to better, explainsituations. (use adchtio.nal pages as necessarsyt):
i .6 . .: s:, wx ..:t•Il�t.lt.1:I.`..i " .4i'` t
Reviewer/Ins ector Name t t Phone: Z�-t7
P f<< ...1. �'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .e Date: Q4,4 Z0
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ` —j Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes!No
No El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists El ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate. box below. El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ An al Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional' Comment's'and/orDrawings
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit QJC/outine
ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for yisit 0 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification
Number I Date of Visit:
Permitted [3 Certifi d [] Conditionally Certified D Registered
Farm Name: JIA
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
ime:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _
County: .tom
Phone No:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: I Integrator: e, Cy .
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ` I& Longitude 0• 06 «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .31b I f
05103101
Structure 6
Continued

0
Facility Number: 3j 5 D Date of inspection 0 Y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type "+µ cl�L (SCs�. S'­4 r..n,..->
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
e) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑`No
❑ Yes ON'.
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes [2'<o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Q N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes
a
❑ Yes
Najd,
❑ Yes
[fNo
❑ Yes
DNo
❑ Yes
El No
❑ Yes
Q No,,,"..
o,, •
❑ Yes
p No
❑ Yes
[j No
❑ Yes
No '
❑ Yes'Nq'
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
Vo
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.,Sa1*W iy '. -, .. e. .;..... � ec � 4 .<� 3.y.•xk, �...:iTha�f3 d'.cc.
Co o enz6ttsn(r`efer toey uestioit.#) Explain any YES answers aad/or'any recommendations or any other comments .
Use drawings of facility b better explain situatitiiisr (use additional pages us necessary) :%
w [] Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
��
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: ' — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. hoes the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
M Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings::
05103101
❑ Yes No
ElYes;No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑❑ Yes V
YesElYes

Facility Number
Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Com nee Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up Q Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z ii Arrival Time: i--;� v Departur Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: _ o Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: leget 11-0 A57 U" 1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine ;:.Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e = 4 = Longitude: 0 ° = ` =
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population_,.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Ca
Number of Structures:. �L
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 90<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑.NA El NE
El Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

1
c
Facility Number: 3
Date of Inspection I & t2_ Vt O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Observed Freeboard (in): O L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No -NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes o ❑ NA [I NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No El NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No "NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) -a' �•�_ __, -
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1p"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 7�w
ElNA ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El NA [INE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r�j4.,S Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 30 Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
"NoNA
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21,
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�NoClNA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
,2""'
D<o ❑ NA
❑ NI;
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ElNA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
_NA
A�o[01
ElNE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
NNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
AdditionalCoirimeiits and/oriDrawingsr �1 1p
YP p fl tl: Y#�' ,�• Y"� i`-3' £ ;1 �F. �' Ca? .s Env."i
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

IType of Visit 6 Compl' a Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �/, Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: SO.d"N t ✓QS Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 44T4G y ��^s' 0-"_
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Integrator: da,,_ 5-k — A 3
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e 0. 0 Longitude: = ° 0 i 0
Design Current
De�stg>i Current Design Current
iE#;
Swine Capacity Populat�to�n
Wet�Prly `Capacity Population Cattle C►apa�cilty Pop non
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
❑ an to Feeder
-Layer
❑Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers ❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
eNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
A
El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
rNo
[I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — 3
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 8 (d rV&IJ
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes gNo A ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat ify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Eo
❑ A El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
- N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
�Gomments (refer to9'questinn;'#) "Explain,any�YES_fanswers`and/lor,atiy§r6commenda nns or R.
any other comments.
v.F a - a e pill
[:Use', drawings of iacihtyto better explamsttuahons: (use;additional pageshasnecessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 7
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: I ta
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Y
Facility Number: —3 p Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ YesVNo
NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If es check the appropriate box below.
P g P Y
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ YesV
NA
❑ NE
24,
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
26,
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
[I Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did ReviewerMnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional`Comments`;_andlor DraWings _ It ' }' k':. ' `_� ::
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

R (Division of Water Quality y - f %-O
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Com nce inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Q Other ❑Denied Access
Date of Visit: 76 Q Arrival Time: CTI] Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: a Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ,4
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator: PR67-A` `
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 c = I = N Longitude: 0 ° = t = «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
Design Current.
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Y103
NA ❑ NE
El YesNA ❑ NE
!Yes
No NA ❑ NE
o A ❑ NE
N ❑ NA ❑ NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Ikumber: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre tNA
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesFNo
o ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ A ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifi ❑ Application Outside of Area
r
12. Crop type(s) Yp S /,� Z
13. Sod type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those d%signated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ NVEI- 4A ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
V.,..
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NE
No NA ❑NE
o ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection A
Required
Records & Documents
19,
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
eather Code
Rain InspectioZNo
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit`?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑YesA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

sion of Water Quality 0. 1W
Y Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- — Q Other Agency
Type cf Visit Compli ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4DRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: U % Arrival Time- Time: County:
Farm Name: _J `-�h"S �'-► Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: &'`I ems- > h `S 0-,'
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
.wine
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wqan to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
JcZ ?,-)-b
IA
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
❑
Gilts
Boars
Other
Phone ,No:
Integrator• Pfa K. 544
4
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = e 0 { = « Longitude: = ° = ' =
Design Current Design Current. E
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity PopulationCattle F `Cs
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Puults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
n; Current
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
'a
ElBeef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures n�
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:_� -13 —
Date of Inspection 1 D f7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes rZNo
NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes:No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) k" e S Gw � t j i7r, GJq y r, s r g l„ t
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
r
A ❑ NE
A ❑NE
PNVO NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
No NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES'answers and/or any recommendations�or any other,:comments
Use;drawiugs.of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necess'ary): ,=
ReviewerlInspectorName � � -� ��-- _ -__ - -- _ _ _--- � 1 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:-3 -3Date of Inspection f r�
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes��No
NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or. Drawings:
i
Page 3 of 3 12128104

10FRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tom ofDSWC review 0 Other
Number Date of Inspection p p
Time of Inspection r M& 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ermitted [] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated:
. ..........................
Farm Name Ji4RS01 �'i',�5 SIC .. County: L �
................................................................................................................................................................................I.......
OwnerName: ..................1.. i................................................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...:......................... . ..J.:P... .....
Q tl
...... . �`.�.. �"?.........Title:........................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: l� 6 2 �/ 00..G.. 7............................. `
g.................R...........,........................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:...... t A.k1..�.y.. �a..�.'.`..:�°ti- Integrator: ......................................................................................
...... ....... ..... .-%...
....................................
Certified Operator: .......... 1 G✓. L `
..................Qh........................ Operator Certification Number: . Location of Farm: S'jZ /Z 2 1/
Latitude • ©F—J« Longitude ®• �� ���
egt_" g _Garrent � € � Destgn .Current
SwnPoultry e Gon>Caaci;Po ulat,onCaacit Pio, C
❑Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer"„ ❑Dairy
eeder to Finish D ❑ Non -Layer "❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
3:
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
3
❑ Boars TotaISSLW:r€''
„a
Number of,Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
„Holding Panels-1 Sohd Traps [I Na Liquid Waste Management System
DischarLes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systctr3? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than.from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..........Z ..... ry `!
......../`:.�........................I...........................
❑ Yes ;� zo
❑ Yes o
ElYes VNo
❑ Yes VNoIZ
El Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack

acility amber: — J 0 1 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, sevcrc'crosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes VNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any patt of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes E_d'N0
9.. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
i 1
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitro,en ❑ Yes No
2. Crop type. .............................. 1.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? {footprint} ❑Yes o f
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes No
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes
Required Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Generai Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) <No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, frechoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports} ee!s ❑
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in cl'fect at the time of design? ❑ Yes LdNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ElYes No
NA.v11Wations:or deficiencies .were noted. during. his -visit; - You �vlll.re�ceive n0' further.:.: .
egrresbiHidenee: about; this visit.;
Comments (refer to question #): Explain.any YES answers and/or any=recommendations or any.ottier'comments.
4 r"
666 dwings of facility, to, bFtter explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)-',,
mot
Vl/Ge ,.4 )., t,� rCcc p n 1„reeJr�7 lr�! s Go-t t .
For
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �,�Date: (�
1 /6/99

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ElYes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover' ❑ Yes o
Additional'Cornments and/orDrawings: ' e: I r' t " _ZVru li
Lb _ v 11107
6oil?� Z�irr
i
3/23/99

Type of Visit JU CompliartWinspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Qo foutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Number Date of Visit:
welrmi tted [3 Certifiiedl� 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered
Farm Name:.....r71�t`�/.............!!......i.h s?%1"!......................... ..........................
7 D � Time 0
Q Not Operational C Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
FacilityContact: .......................................................... ........ ............ Title: ................................................................ Phone No:.................................................
Onsite Representative:.... .`�.......... . .'" S rr!......................... Integrator: ...A M .:.... 5 t �:......................................
Certified Operator: .............. .................... .........d-r).'?.''S..................................... Operator Certification Number:....
......................................
Location of Farm:
rI
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4 64
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Struture 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .................. .......1......----•.---................... -1...............' .....................................I.... ............................... .... .......
fl � ►
Freeboard (inches): _
12112103
❑Yes
❑ Yes <No..
❑ Yes � �o
❑ Yes no
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
Continued

:i
Facility Number: 33 — •3 D 1 Date of Inspection 7 2Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 214
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes �No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes o
elevation markings?
Waste APplieation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes eNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAIN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type ,��O�in� o � S�i-i r1 r �1 9 S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes �JO
❑ Yes
❑ Yes V9�1_
0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
•r e^•� •:.u• r ,� - ��c .�,�. �� ; s•.�:r, var. mrn,q "r•� n+ s�ssxw� •^nrr�•r° •nuir,��r.• •,h •^ aetr-°s: .rrKrr , r•-����s,µ-:� -�<,!r;:; Rttt w^Bu...�rrr�rr, n r s.� y 'vi t � �:r'� �
�Camments,(refer tld questron #) '3pp3�,Explatnany,YFSs�ap�swecs and/�<or any{ t�eeommertdations ar3aaydatieerCcomments. aa- E tft�#t r ,, ,�¢�, ,:a.i 3, �, ;p
,..., iEt{�.-::':i1:i}°',ri � �...•s,.d E� riff,, iE.-.."��66�6k1.i #`3��i333 .6�4:&@!$� 2^. r:i�5,.a odb iE�fl5iaad..{". ...�&`.li.rx.sEf.etHi�'n, t' gsm"a ..t,..iP,{s;v8ti �.! d$i..k.E{ei:�(r" a^�¢e Beriei {{' ,J. °:1�f:1��: ii 'i5kro#d';;kw'6..,.f x:#b4..5;<N'A,F3ifU , .I-. ,::,4..MI�i!{8e1&i.IEsrf�$it$t f-��:�3y 9�P,��
`Use dra�nngs of,facility`'to,better expla�ir s�Wattorts: (use�adtlitronayN pages as necessary) r �, ,° ❑Field COPY ❑Final Notes � � ` �`' +r��
;..i..., 3ar ,_� ..,:., t,...Is.........:.Etal�f!,zt...asedr#..�t�(�..EaR -�N....,i%��S.. .f:.r• ..i :.�i.'r',. ,.il �....�. . d.�i@4.,a..u;�RIXt ,�..iis���...�...a�. r,Et.a„!ki'il�t�.']Y,..�}r.:.n rt�,..�3. ?""S',a."l.�F,"��59'� ����`.'.1�,',..� 6k'�'L��§?��.fa,-t,l..rri;�!W� ., r. _�i1i
A6
Reviewer/Inspector Name i ' it' .,i`;€ 'EE Ear a :,r? �p fury E s�3 !.t i,Et.!IR"F' @;�#1� r#rii' • l '�l.J!fi' e ',
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z Z D
12112103 Continued

II
Facility Number: 3S ,3 Z> Date of Inspection 2Z
Required Records & Document.~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Inc
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ElYes o
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes o
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) es ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes []dNo
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes o
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1 " Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

tom. .� •�V
vivision of Soil and;Water Conservation °,r" ail
_.Other AlenCy.- #
r' p . r I d t S B
C N
E#
Type of Visit Compli Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
F tty Number hate of Visit: M" Time:
Q Not Operational C Below Threshold
ermitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name:. 17-ir.. ��.. `�.`1. `°.....12/.:!--:................................. County:. G.�r� '.................................................
Owner Name:
........................................................................................................................... Phone No: -
Facility Contact: .....................................................Title:.................. Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ....................................................................—.................. ...........................
Onsite Representative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:...... P 5.6. f. �...!......................................
Certified Operator:.......:��r4.� ` ... --Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
......`�J...t.nf'b~.''........................................... of r:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� �"
Swine Ca
❑ We Feeder
eeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1�.9 Niixnber of Lagoons Er a
Holding Ponds;'% Solid'Traps .
Design Current'
Poultry CaDac'ity 'Population Cattle
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. [f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/Inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 3 I Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: L II . t2 ...... ...........................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes
❑ Yes LJ No
❑ Yes Q"No
❑ Yes
ETfNo
❑ Yes
Now
❑ Yes
0
{o
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure 6
Continued on back

6
Facility Number:, j Date of Inspection /L b Printed on: 1/9/200
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type J g.e , z„4f 9
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard pr Iems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Insp or fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facilityquire a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Wer�ny additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
*"io jatioos'e r• 000cleolH -wore bkod 0�tl` 119 this;vlsX.- ;Y0 011-�e 0*6 0t fotthgr
corresnoridence: about this :visit: .................................. .
1
❑ Yes
❑ Yes a o
❑ Yes 011O
❑ Yes 1d'No
❑ Yes Lama
❑ Yes .2r �o
ElYes td't�o
❑ Yes !moo
❑ Yes Jd'No�
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Yesi-
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes;N�o�
❑ YesVNo,,--
El
❑ Yes Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
9:
❑ Yes o
3 -,lr.d 79 ex' - P�11' �f ➢, Fsn 1 E? 1n1!',il°`:1�y""�7,°."
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;E�°�j !f , sl+: t i € �; i i Y,6F:l' .�..i. } ��.. f?.il 3>' 8� �.�°'��� E!< ,i}° ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j 7- sm,

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection J Z V Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes :ZNo.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes;0--�z
ElYes Elo
5100

■
F ity Number
Date of Visit: Z C Time:
10 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 1 D_r7 6 ns 0_1 County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: G6&g,4 1 �`—
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0a 06 44 Longitude • �• «
SOUND n Current Design Current i e
Design Current
Swine Ca aci P,o ulation Poultry Ga aci
,iP,o upon Cattle t Ca aci Po ulation
❑ W to Feeder: ❑ La er
❑ Dairy
eeder to Finish 5' ❑ Non -Layer 1
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
T L Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
"
❑ Boars
Total SSl W
Number of Lagoons © ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste
Management SystemINIM
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 7s � �t _ 7, 311
05103101
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
ElYes No
❑ Yes Y
ElYes
❑ Yes N V
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 3ji — Date of Inspection ri
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type ;' 7 ,.
13. Do the receiving crops differ Cith those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes Z_No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes to
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes LI N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes LQ N
❑ Yes �
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes LI N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�, q } P y, y Comments, refer ta:" ueshon# Ez lain ati ,YI✓S"answers aniar an .recommendations ornan �other�enmments " ��, Y
Use tlrawitigs�of facilityttMitteefex'Platn situations: (use additional pages as,necessaff �. ❑Field Copv ❑Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name r,(�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: O
05103101 Continued

Type of Visit .0 Com ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z > Arrival Time: 11.3 i5 Departure Time: County: Region:
2 1 �
Farm Name: 1.7>) �t i �� A __S o n Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ` ���'`-�y p.�
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 0 = = Longitude: = o ❑
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Design
Wet Pouy . C+apa`city
;Current;
P�opu stun
�Design. Current
Cattle Opacity P elation
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Nan -La ei
❑
Dair Cow
❑ Wetin to Feeder
❑Dai
Calf
Feeder to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
El Pullets
£"
"'
❑
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to WeanPoultry,'-q"
D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
❑Beef
❑
Beef Stocker
Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Numa of Structures:
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Po Its!
Other
❑ Other
11
JE1 Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
�
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
ElYes.
M<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
�No❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
NA
nNo
El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El YesNA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — 0 Date of Inspection 7 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No[01
NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes /No
El NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑yesEl NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Na ❑ NA [IN E
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) P CG.O 1� C'_f .►.. �w4— �/�,Q . a. ��� f
13. Soil type(s)
P'H lA- r fA1- Ar
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �6 No .❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes Ll N — ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, El Yes -f N ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ 1�6/11 NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name ( T Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection L O�
Reutuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes FNOo
NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP (IChecklists
El Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain InspectionZN
eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? El YesNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N El NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesZEJ
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes PNo NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Add ,ltibhal;Corn rrients and/or Drawings:
12128104
12128104

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
.fames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
ffl7XA
�EHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 8, 1995
Mr. Robert Johnson
Route 2, Box 284
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27801
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
State Road 1224
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
On August 4, 1995, Mr. Eric Fleek from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Fleek's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in compliance
during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District,
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101. Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 6M recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Robert Johnson
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Eric Fleek at [phone].
Sincerely,
'j, ca,,Y-
J y E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

• JUL-14-1995 15:2e FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECT IDN TO
R-RO r.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Atten!�nn
Facility No. _ 3 1 - 3d
DIVTSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAII VISITATION RECORD
S DATE: �" , 1995
Tune:
Farm Na
Mailing .
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: _._ _ _ —__ _ Phone:
Physical Address/Locadon: _ S E ) 2- Q 4`
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle ,I
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: ' je9 /b-Y Ci d
DEM Cerdfi lion Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: � Longitude:'" Elevation: _Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of l Fv 45 ear 24 hour storm event ��-
(approximately l Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Acrual Freeboard:�X�L. Inche Ll/cy
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or Z Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate land available for sprz 9 es No Is the cover crop adequate? Ges�
or No
Crop(s) being utilized: CfC-.-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? Y or No
_ r a_nirnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
a:iimal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes No
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flusbing system, or other
;irni;ar man-made devices? Yes or eo if Yes. Please Explain.
r)i,cs iht Facility wasntain adequate waste matiagernctit records (volumes of manure, land applied
spray irrigated on specific acrcaF
wi cover p)'? Ye or�
t
Additional Comments: AI I t� 40 C�.
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed
TOTAL F.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
am�
1:�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 28, 1997
Mr. Robert Johnson
Route 2, Box 111
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27801
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 33-30
Robert Johnson Swine Farm
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Johnson: I
On July 23, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the operation was not discharging
wastewater 'into waters of the State and that operations were
proceeding according to your approved Animal Waste Management' Plan.
As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be in
compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
,lu Garrett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, A!' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N� o C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10°.6 post -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours ��
Farm Status: ❑ stered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review LYE
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated* .......................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: .... ...'?rS.J1'......L'..S�.P..'.<...G........................................ County:.A,�r...4'�ilrP �.......... ...................
Land Owner Namc:. +� ..... � ,0 s. �.................................... Phone No: ..l.r. ....-y. (!.......` j. ..................
Facility Conctact:............ 5!:..Q.............................................. Title: ........ Phone No:
Mailing Address:....&. ...'. 7.............6s 1................... A.�/vt Gkc n, T...... Z7.�..R.i.................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ..... .......... Integrator: i'�`'�7�✓ 9
Certified Operator:...... � ll.py. T.,........ r.� H .! . V -........`'. R......... ............. I Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: S /2- 1 2 2 V
Latitude ' 6 ;6 Longitude 0 L{
G neral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes No
Cl Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes rNo
Continued on back

Facility Number:...
6. Facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity.(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
!....'..:__.. �....`l .......... ...... ..........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes ;No
'14
❑ Yes
El Yes Z� O
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Appligation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W—MP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type O- ...........f.4., �..............................................................................................................
1
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
FprCertified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes IL[ !v o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes [a'N0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZVNQ-
0,
❑ Yes Yes
❑ Yes 1N,1
❑ Yes l.d 1vo/
❑ Yes jNo
Comrrients,{refer to question`#} Explain any YES answers and/or'a" recommendations of any other comments
3
Use drawings of facrhty to better explain situations. (use "additional pages as necessary}
4 ! "_ & W 4__q b K rt S to Wz,/.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,., r N MA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:? -- - J %
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
of Water Quality
-- — I Date of ]Inspection w 7X
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered O ce/rtified E3 Applied for Permit D Permitted JE3 Not Operational I
I Date Last Operated: . ..........................
Farm Name:..cJ.lpp?' L.!.cSl<r.`.......... ................................................. County:..fqaw`q e.................. .......................
Owner Name:.......1? V.l......t t...� n. f_................................................... Phone No:...../..r'. 1....'...7� G - S 3 %
FacilityContact: 1 "o ..ay.n I `.......Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ... Z :...... ..�........... ... t( ��0 t � pK w <✓ L Z % t) ........ ......
.....................................................................�...............................................
.....
..� ...
n L /
Onsite Representative: ....... 1./A.:.�?.g(L .:....S1ci fit_^ S G\............................. Integrator......................�. a..�-..........................................
Certified Operator; .............) S_��.a,� I,,.....c/ J..�'t K. (.. .............................. Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
1 ',"`Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Populati=on_' Poultry a�nCapacity P_apula_tion `Cattle r ; ,Capacity `Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
.E= ceder to Finish 27 J D ❑Non -Layer I 1 10Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow, to Wean =
= ❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
�;�.. ❑ Farrow to Finish ,Total Design I
CapBci=ty
❑Gilts
❑ soars .Total SSLW
w` n=
l❑ No
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maimcnance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3: Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste. management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Er No
•❑ Yes No
❑ Yes !, �vo
❑ Yes ;a O
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Y No
Continued on back

.Pacilit�iNumhcr: --3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes a<o
Structures (Lagoons,I110lding Ponds, Plush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
..- .....................................................................................................
Freeboard(fty ......... Zc................ .,,..,...............................
t0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'? ❑ Yes I\u
11, Is erosion, or any ether threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? Cl Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/inil)rovement7 ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do.any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes z0
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes `0 1
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type r!.............
;3 /!z^t- !.!.T........ ....................... .. ...................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes NO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes -N
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. tIs there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certirted or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP?
25. e any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? r. s; •;. ' ,,..` :. `
la
0 No.violations or deficiencies were•noted during' this. visit. will receive no further
correspondence ab::oiit this.visit: '
❑ Yes , o
❑ Yes No"
❑ Yes N0
❑ 1'cs :Nol
'o
❑ Yeti
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
!fex to:question #): Explaidany YES answers and/or any recommendations or_any,`other cornmet
of fiilcility-to better explaiti `situaticins(use' additional pales as nece5tih`ry):
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name :
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
i� 7: Date:

I
ine O [:omolaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection 0
I Facility Number I
Registered 0 Certified E3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
FarmName: ...........................................................................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ....................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................'Title.................
llow-up of DSWC, review Q Other
Date of Inspection 1
Time of Inspection � 2-t hr. (hh:mrn)
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County: ... i .t..�.................................
.......... Phone No:.............................................................................. .....
................................................ Phone No:.........................................
MailingAddress: ......................................... ............ ..................... .................. ........... I .... .............. .... ..........................
Onsite Representative:,�d ,/.�..y..f.............. ..d� r�,?. t `�......................... lntcgr:►tor;... JV� !`..._..........................................
Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number,...........................
Location of Farm:
E ii i� iiiiii ii iiii ii III C
ME
Latitude • i [—::—] " Longitude ° 6,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine . Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non-Daii�
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity.
Total SSLW
NumberofLagoons / Holdm'g P(►: ds, JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagot)n Area 10 Spray Field Area {
❑ No Liquid Waste. anagement System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes,(:�No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ YesNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes "D No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If vea. notifv DWQ) ❑ Yes O! No
i
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in cal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 'dNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,© No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes '[TNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes © No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes q1I10
//
7/25/97 Continuedran back

x Facility Number: 7j —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, et
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
identifier:�j;
.........................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ............................... ............................ ........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes [;/l10
❑ Yes 9*11-10
Structure 5 Structure 6
.................................... ......... I ...... ....... I ......... ...
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ///0 No
�es ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
//��
ElYes Z No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enter' g waters of the State, notify DWQ)
/,I'INo
15.
Crop type ���..t{A.......... ...�.r'............... ......................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
6No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
V�No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
///No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
J21"No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
Z"No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
No
0 - No.violations or deficiencies. we're' no' te'd- during' this.' visit.- :You.will t•ecei:ve na ftirther :
correspondence about this'. visit.,'.'.
A- .
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: llff%l f_,�,IAlt f Date: 7,

Ren•iscd January 22 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 3 D
Farm Name: _75_ol�n� avn
On -Site Representative:_ ! d✓'1f 5o ff�-c�
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: l,Pwe-i (
Date of site visit: 71- �� !
Date of most recent WUP: 1 -13- 9 1
Operation is'flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
ZPa'eligibility items) F1 F2 F3 F4
tion not required to secure WA
determination a r time based on
exemption E1 t EV E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: Z J'J pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circl � d-hose traveler; 2. enter -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
sta long s rin er sys em w permanent pipe 5. s a ionary sprinkler system wlportable pipe,
6. stationary gun system w perman e; stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and sign d by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter heet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and * ned by a A�
E4 75% rule exemption s erife i P rt 1. (\NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that it �ii�' i it hecklist in Part H. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 FQ F 'CS/eop
ompleting computational table in Part Ill)
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist an oation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required becaeration failsone of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of informationlmap.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.
Sc C t, � -<'

Revised 1anuan, 22, 1999
r #y Number 33 --3 o _
art 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD
NUMBER NUMBER`
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
2r, z 13 4-i
4Y*,
P"'
s-
z
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I i
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
I
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWI IF
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc, cross more than one field, inspectcrlreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subiect to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER` - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAW1v1P acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 501/o
of its annual PAN as documented in the farms previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation, records, cannot se7,ve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-uo fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessibie
by irrigation system.

)---, i j
�
-

:ram..
.Division of Soi d Water Conservation = Operation Reviewe,j yz '99 r.
O-Di o Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance In
spec
ivisibn.of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other, Agency - Operation Review
outine O Com taint O hollow-u of DW? ins action Q FolloNti'-u of DSLvC rcvic►v Q Other
Facility Number 3 Date of Inspection
'I'itne of Inspection pp 24 hr. (hh:mm) \,
© Permitted `Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O er:rtional (D�•a�tree Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...�1.!`,� ...�'4..tR.S....A..t f.�-... County:.L..fg—.' L
Q.........................................
Owner Name: .............. d �,, s o,.I ..Phone iNro:....2' .Z- --- Yyta -� 73
..............f-.... o. ......................... ...............................
FacilityContact: S h^........................................... .ritle:........................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: D >� P... 1Z K/ C— �- 7 a
Onsilc Representative: . J� �rJ !1`� Integrator: !,. ........................................................
.... .................................................................... ....
Certified Operator: � � ��'`f v�, Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
............................. °.......................... .......,
Location of Farm: _�> l% 1 2 Z (—
latitude Longitude � • �0°°
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ WearLW, Feeder
❑ eeder to Finish
Z 7 ~p
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer F= 1[] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I I[] Non -Dairy I I,
❑ Other f
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (lf' yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. 11'disc•harge is observed, was the conveyance inan-tn:tde?
i). If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters []Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estinialed How in Lal/niin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No ,
❑ Yes TNo%
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Z C tt
Freeboard(inches): .............`. LA..+1.......... ............................................ .......................................................................................
..........................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 33 — 3 Bate of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(it any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste ADDIication
❑ Yes -C to
❑ Yes
❑ Yes tQt�o
❑ Yes r
es �0N
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2'No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes IGl too
12. Crop type f °.)......s ...¢ten-r�6.-�.............................................................................................................................................................kNo
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes ;No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ElYes o
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 2To
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, traps, etc.)
❑ Y No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes o
er/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
23. Did �Revii,`
❑ Yes N
24. D city require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
NA.violatioits.or. deficiencies .were noted. during .Hiis,visii:..Y.ou W* flfre� eive nar furiher .: .
.. .. ...... .. .... ...... .
coriresporidence; about; this visit.: ...... ; • : • . • . • . • . • . . . • . • : • ; •
Coronients,'(refer- to question #)­ Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommendations r any outer comments ,�`j� y }
Use drawings of facility to betier explain situations. (use additional page' as necessary): i ., `. r 1
.` ;;'
j
w roc .' �� ►� rla c� s A`, ,e_ w� P �gr�,./� e/�, g 4 & f v i to G..h,b
A,
t} 4J Rr a. ls� r7v`¢wfee d �i}f Tq7 4-6 12r'r.J, " 0 17ke"70 "-. cLcrtl`
r e- [n� � e 'j-o ;;� It O r r r-*- 11 L,' -4 A- ,;,,O/d L'ejp-Vrh 06-% f1 a• t Gfwe .
rr
la i4c,-es SA v,'l c r 4F-4 ,4 Fr i/dIl pb'// ,T
3/
Vv
K1c4t,4*/ 4 c-G-4-r' � o % F,,e leis /3 a--- - /4
Fw-C.1. t � 11 'as p •� f��-- G�+� .e�/ �Q-�'�.. -- Sti �.l ra SQ.f C v.. ••� �r��,..r
J,o l� Y ► a.s� m--� j., Goy p °' "�" r' ^ �I.` Icy w � /
Reviewer/Inspector Name
11/6/99
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date- 7
/

0� w A TF9
`off Q�
C r
0
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ROBERTJOHNSON
RT 2 Box 284
ROCKY MOUNT NC.27801
Dear Robert Johnson:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 7, 2002
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Johnson Livestock
Permit Number: AWS330030
Edgecombe County
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 8/6/1999.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 8/6/2002 - 8/5/2003 is $150.00. Your payment was due 10/12/2002,
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 211.0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Sincerely,
I+ 1 / t 3
s:
�.,..=sue`
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
06-25-2003
This plan has been prepared for:
Robert L. Johnson
'Robert L. Johnson 33,36
Route 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
252-446-5374
Thi&plan has been developed by:
Margaret Knight
Edgecombe SWCD
201 St. Andrew Street
RECEIVED 1 Dl:NR I DWQ
P 4 Box IO
AQiljFFR-PRCITFrTInN SF_CTf Qf
Tarboro, NC 27886
MAR 72009 zOR9
lo
De toper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan. -
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil.and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
T cal Specialist Signature Date
----- - ---- ---- •-- g
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 1 Cover Pa e 1

!r'
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,549,250 gals/year
by a 2,750 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5871
Incorporated
10084
Injected
11105
Irrigated
6382
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
7,821.50
3,124,228
-574,978
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, I1 means user defined source.
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summ
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2012
13
NIA
Norfolk
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
2012
l4a
N/A
Goldsboro
Fescue Pasture
4,0 Tons
2012
14b
NIA
Goldsboro
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2012
14c
N/A
Goldsboro
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2012
15
NIA
Norfolk
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
2012
6
N/A
Marlboro
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
Small Grain Ovetseed
1.0 Tans
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below
the root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< = 10
to soluble nutrient leaching
beiow the root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use
> 10
the root zone.
efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge
nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field
practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
------------------- - -------- -- - --
588650. Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 PCS Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing
of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on' each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. 'A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to
ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient
application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to
prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
I Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 gals
Ions
2012
13
S7
Norfolk
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
*130
0
0
brig.
130
5L93
0
425.80
0.00
2012
t4a
S7
Goldsboro
7.60
7.60
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*160
0
0
brig.
160
63.91
0
485.72
0.00
2012
14b
S7
Goldsboro
4.60
4.60
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*160
0
0
Irrig.
160
6191
0
293.99
0.00
2012
14t
S7
Goldsboro
6.40
6.401
Fescue Pasture
4.0 ions
8/1-7/31
* 160
0
01
Irrig.
1601
63.91
0
409.03
0.00
2012
15
S7
Norfolk
7.40
7.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9130
296
0
0
brig.
296
118.24
0
874.94
0.00
2012
15,
S7
Norfolk
7.40
7.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0
147.79
0.00
2012
6
S7
Marlboro
5.10
5.10
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0
611.15
0.00
2012
6
S7
Marlboro
5-10
5. 10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
101.86
0.00
---- - - ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03
WUT Page t

Waste Utilization Table
Year
Tract
Field
Source
I 1-17.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Cro
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,350.27
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,549.25
Balance, 1000 gallons
-80L02
Total Applied, tans
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
- -- - ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate
varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not
result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field
selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any
one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(incites)
2012
13
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
2012
14a
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
2012
14b
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
2012
14c
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
2012
15
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
2012
6
Marlboro
0,40
0.96
------------------•------------•-......------------------------------------- ------------------------- - I---- ---
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 IAF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each
source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent At clean out,
this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is
nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally
very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and
lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
34.48
68.95
103.43
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
17.24
34.48
51.71
Soybean 40 bu
160
14,04
32.32
64.64
96.96
----------------------...---------------------------------------..-...-. ..------------------.- . -. --- --- g----.-------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Stora2e Cavacity
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
12/15
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
150
1
5
119
1
6
89
1
7
142
1
8
180
1
9
150
1
10
133
1
11
103
1
12
72
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--._ .. ... _ ..--- - - -...
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that .reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation -in the design folder. that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by 'injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate. in North Carolina" for guidance).
-------------- ---------------------.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6125/03 Specification Page i

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal.waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted drops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients: Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only. be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
--------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at.crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on,other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper Ievels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------- -
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification rage 4

Crop Notes .
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundeover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and mi cronutri ents to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N, annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 15
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
-------------------------- ----- - • ------------------------ ---•----
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 CropNote Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 14a, 14b, 14c
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Moderate to Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue will tolerate soil wetness but not flooding or prolonged saturation; use
ladino clover for mixtures on these soils. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and
potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply
N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 13
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test
for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each
window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in
North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 1544ovember 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
--------------------------------------------- - --- ------ ------------------------------- -...
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 15
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October I5-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbslacre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ------------------..---------- -- ---- -- ----- --
58865o Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 -Crop Note Page 3 of 3.

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Robert L. Johnson
Robert L. Johnson
Route 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
252-446-5374
06-25-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Margaret Knight/42�5/4�1
Edgecombe SWCD201 St. Andrew StreetP O Box 10Tarboro, NC 27886252-641-7900
Type of Plan: Nitr gen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
1 ..
Plan Approved
T ca Specialist Signature Date
----------- •-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,549,250 gals/year
by a 2,750 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5871
Incorporated
10084
Injected
11105
Irrigated
6382
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
7,821.50
3,124,228
-574,978
------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ..... ......... .-. ----------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2012
13
NIA
Norfolk
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
2012
14a
NIA
Goldsboro
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2012
14b
NIA
10oldsboro
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2012
14c
NIA
Goldsboro
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
2012
15
N/A
Norfolk
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
2012
6
NIA
Marlboro
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
LI
Potential Leach*
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below
the root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< = 10
to soluble nutrient leaching
below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use
> 10
the root zone.
efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge
nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of --field
practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
----- -----------------------------------------------------
588650 Database Version 2.0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Printed: 06-25-2003 PCS Page I of 1

The Waste Utilizafion table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing
of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to
ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient
application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to
prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
i/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
2012
13
S7
Norfolk
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
*130
0
0
brig.
130
51.93
0
425.80
0.00
2012
14a
S7
Goldsboro
7.60
7.60
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*160
0
0
brig.
160
63.91
0
485.72
0.00
2012
14b
S7
Goldsboro
4.60
4.60
Fescue Pasture
4.01
8/1-7/31
*160
0
0
brig.
160
63.91
0
293.99
0.00
20121
14c
S7
Goldsboro
6.40
6.40
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*160
0
0
1 brig.
160
63.91
0
409.03
0.00
2012
15
S7
Norfolk
7.40
7.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig.
296
118.24
0
874.94
0.00
2012
15
S7
Norfolk
7.40
7.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
147.79
0.00
2012
6
S7
Marlboro
5.10
5.10
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0
611.15
0.00
2012
6
S7
Marlboro
1 5.10
5.10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/I -3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0
101.86
0.00
------------------------------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ------------------ ---- ---------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2:0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 W JT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
pbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
I gaVA
I tons
1000 gals
I tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,350.27
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,549.25
Balance, 1000 gallons
-801.02
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
o.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned-
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
-------- --- --------- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate
varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not
result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per how' that may be applied to each field
selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any
one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
'tract
Field
Soil series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
2012
13
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
2012
l4a
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
2012
l4b
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
2012
14c
Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
2012
15
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
2012
6
Marlboro
0.40
0.96
-------- - ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------•---------------------------------------------------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 IAF Page 1. of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each
source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out,
this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is
nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally
very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and
lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
34.48
68.95
103.43
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
17.24
34.48
51.71
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
32.32
64.64
96.96
-------------------------------------•--.---------...-----------------------------------------------•-------------•- --------------------•-------------------------------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste StoraLye Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
12/15
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
150
1
5
119
1
6
89
1
7
142
1
8
180
1
9
150
1
10
133
1
11
103
1
12
72,
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------- ----- - ----. -------------------- --- •-------------------...--------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
--------------------- ._.....------------ ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil inf ltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
588650 Database Version 10 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
------ ...----------------------------- ----------- ............................... . - -
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-- ----•-•- •--------•--- - •-----------•---- --- ------ - --- ..------.
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/25/03 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 15
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
kb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
....----•----------- ....---- ------ ... 8
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): I4a, 14b, I4c
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Moderate to Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb1ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue will tolerate soil wetness but not flooding or prolonged saturation; use
ladino clover for mixtures on these soils. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and
potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 ]b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply
N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 13
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb1ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test
for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each
window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in
North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/driIl row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbslacre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
598650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

m
The following crop note applies to field(s): 15
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
------ --- --- ----------.- . .-- .. .._-.
588650 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-25-2003 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

ROBERT L. JOHNSON
RFD 2, Box 284
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
Tel. [phone]
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervision
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster:
June 28, 2000
4d�
In response to your letter to me dated June 21, 2000 regarding failure to read and record
freeboard levels, I have taken the following measure:
I began taking freeboard level readings on Monday, June 26`s and will read them every Monday
from this point on. These readings will be a part of my waste management records and available
for Buster or whomever to check on their next visits.
I am sorry for the lapse.
Best regards,
Robert L. Johnson
RLP/j
CC: A. B. Whitley
Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
Tarboro, NC 27886

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL. OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 21, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETTTRN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Bobby Johnson
Route 2, Box 284
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27801
Subject: Notice of Violation
rJohnson-L`ivestack
CA.W..S33 0
r-Edgecombe-County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
On June 8, 2000, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection of the subject swine facility. The inspection revealed the following
violation of your Certificate of Coverage under General Permit AWG100000:
Your permit requires that lagoon freeboard levels be recorded on a weekly basis.
While there were some records on site, the inspection noted a lapse of several
months for this condition of your General Permit.
Please note that violations of your Certificate of Coverage (COC) AWS330030
under General Permit AWG100000 can be subject to civil penalties of up to S
10,000.00 per day, per violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of receipt. Your
response should indicate your intentions to correct the referenced violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have
any questions regarding this Notice please contact Buster Towell at [phone]-.-
Sincerely,
r Kenneth uster, P.E.
Regio Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
Ms. Margaret O'Ke-fe, RRO-DSWC
MAILING Aa OREss: 1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROL]NA 27699-t 628
LOCATION: 3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]a
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 21, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
REILMN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Bobby Johnson
Route 2, Box 284
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27801
Subject: Notice of Violation
Johnson Livestock
AWS330030
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
On June 8, 2000, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection of the subject swine facility. The inspection revealed the following
violation of your Certificate of Coverage under General Permit AWG100000:
Your permit requires that lagoon freeboard levels be recorded on a weekly basis.
While there were some records on site, the inspection noted a lapse of several
months for this condition of your General Permit.
Please note that violations of your Certificate of Coverage (COC) AWS330030
under General Permit AWG100000 can be subject to civil penalties of up to S
10,000.00 per day, per violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of receipt. Your
response should indicate your intentions to correct the referenced violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have
any questions regarding this Notice please contact Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,,
-1. r Kenneth uster, P.E.
Regio Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
MAILING AoDRESS: 1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1620
LOCATION: 3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE 919-671-A700 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 50% RECYCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
Dear Robert Johnson:
4 •
AdOIIII
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
`f v f ?
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 33 30--,=
Edgecombe:County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

ODivrsion of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
i /C Division•of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection 3,
[3 Divisioii-of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection p
© Othet'Agency -Operation Review
�16 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ il]speetion__ 0 Ft)llow-tipof DSWC review- Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection Z
j Time of Inspectiou 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[j Permitted 13 Certified © Conditionally Certified Cj Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ......................................................................................... ............... County:.....................................................................................
Owner Name: .......................................... Phone No:
Facilitv Contact: .............................................................................. Title:.............................. . Phone No:
N-lailing Address: ..................................................................... I.............................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:.1�a.... ............. .. ,......................................... Intel;rotor:..... / Ji g.......... ............................. ......
....
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 & 'r Longitude ' �° �•
Design Current
3wrne Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischari!vs & Stream Imt>acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estinnatcd flow in gathnin'?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'? ([[' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'!
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? [:1 Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 StRIULure 4 Structure 5
[dcntil'icr: 1, 44,5-,c--
freeboard cinches)'
El Yes n No
El Yes (]'
No
Yes / `No
/
%
El Yes 7No
Structure 0
_ . ............ ........................................................ ................ ... ...................................................................... f
5. Are there any immediate threats to the intcacity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage. etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspvction L ✓/,f J
• 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ElYes 10
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes/�o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? [-]Yes VNO .
Waste Application I
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ff No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes /No
12, Crop type �j /110
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes vrNo
14. a} Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`? ❑ Yes /XNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ANo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [;3No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �*O
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have -Tr
Certi t� of C_gvCr e & �cneral `rmit �Nicjily available? El Yes �] No
18. Does the facility ail to have (aFll components o tie Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �' o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes�No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 'P�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes VNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ['No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [ No
i'Vo yiolaticjris;or iieficiencies vtFere inbteii iiirring this visit; Yorx will reeeiye tio: fukther.
• ;correspondence: about: this :visit: • '.' .'' :: ' . ' . • . :.: ' ::.. ' ::: ' : ' :. ' ::
Comments {refer to question #} Explain airy YES answers acid/or atij%'recommendattotis�or,4any�,€other comments
Usedrawtags of facility to better eXplatn `situations. {use additronah pages ¢as necessaiy) 3 r� E �`+ 1��';'
J2,v T ,UO C`405 .off ¢
pod c 6 � �ztzr � }{-�v� �b �' C ,a SP
�l l3� G-,P-,ss I s c cvC�l/� tvt E-
/ v a l NC.,e F-&s c- I N Ego !""'V FiGowl l_4 47
Reviewer/inspector Name 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
`t�
Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: , Date of Inspection
�T
(Wor Issues
f
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27,
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
qO
A,
28.
Is there any evidence of'wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
IVNo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
3/23/99

RFD 2, Box 284
RocKy Mount, NC 27501
Tel. [phone]
MAAAI
Tb: Buster Towel From: Bobby Johnson
Fax: [phone] Pages:-2-- f
Phone- Date: 5/10199
Re: CC:
Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply O PIease Recycle
I am faxing you a copy ofthc map with irrigation lanes designated and also a revised copy of a
waste management plan - AB has signed off on both of these_ I am still waiting to get the
documentation &am Billy Gillam an field 15 which has the solid set risers. I was in touch
with Billy twice and he said he would get it done but he is really busy and will get to it very
shortly_ Billy has also talked to AB and knows what is needed.
As soon as I receive something from Billy I will send it can to you but I just wanted you to
know I am trying to gel the information you requested.
BJr
Enclosures
100(n 0D Uado Ilysuvad PTT8L9O9SU% OVL0 66/01/30

PEARSALL OPER CO Q 002
05/10/99 07;49 '&2529378114
r --6-
Tit
AM
* Ily
J7
/
L OFF
16
r
-t 7z
Vt. OL
10
i.,.
4F. W4
-, ZZ
k A

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: ROBERT L, JOHNSON
Location: ROUTE 2 BOX 284
ROCKY NOVNT NC 27801
Telephone: [phone]+4
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish swiie
Number of Animals: 2750,00 hags
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE! Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Yrrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater_ The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer. required for the crap
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximizo the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilise.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, lea4hing potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DW¢ regulations.
Page: 1
coo in 0D HHJO 11dSUV3d VURLU99Z$ 09:L0 WOT/90

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6_ To maximize the value -of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based an the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range far specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
management Commission.
AMOUNT of WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3w tons, etc.)
2750 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5225 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
275o hags x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 637,5 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
page: 2
6000 00 Had0 llysuad 6TT9LC6ZSZ$ TS:L0 66/OT/50

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
Comm N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AFT N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
8.2
TIME
2012
13
NoA
FP
2.6
130
1066
I
SEP-APR
2012
I
114C
1GoA
�FP
�3.2
1160
16.4
11024APR
2012
FP
3.2
160
4.6
736
J149
]GOA
I
1
1 1
1
ISEP-APR
2012
14A
FP
3.2
lGc)A
1160
17.6
11216
SEP-APR
2012
15
NoA
BF
4.6
I
1
1172.5
17.4
11276.5
APR-SEP
2012
15
NOA
WA
1
I
150
17.4_]370
SEP-MAR
2012
6
BH
6.0
30d
1530
`
jMdA
Y
15.1
IAPR-SEP
END
T
I
I
TOTAL17218.5
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3/ I
f
S000 V Uad0 'I'Iysuvdd bTT9LV692ZQ T5=L0 66/ovs0
NOON

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERN LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
Comm N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AG
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
Whtilow:1"[l
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen} equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE'
TONS
37.5
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
so
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES I LBS AW N USED
Page: 4
9001a 0D 13d0 11VSHyad tTT8L96Z9Z.$ T5:L0 66/OT/SO

TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
39.3
0
39.3
*** BALANCE
7218.5
0
721.8.5
-893.5 1
---------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
page: 5
Looq� 00 2iad0 livsUYdd PTTRL9699ZZ ZS'LO 66/OT/30

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter straps along ditches,
odd areas'unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICA`1'ION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rash and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or -other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1017.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5087.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will nead 16.9583333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 40.7 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, sail structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen deeds of the crop.
if surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6
900in 0D Nad0 IlysNyad rTT8LC6Z5Z$ Z5=L0 66/0T/90

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The.following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts,
I I
I
(Application RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
I Field l
Soil Type
I crop
I (in/hr) I (inches)
2012
113 I
l I *1
NOA
I FP
2012 114A
I
! l *1
GOA
FP
2012 114B
l
I I *1
GOA
l FP
2012 i
14C I
! I *1
GoA
l FP
2012 115
!
I BP
NoA
2012 1
6 I
I I *1
MaA
l BH
2012 I
-15 I
I I *1
NOA
I WA
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen. allowed for the crop is not over
appliea. in many situations, the application amount shown cannvt
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation_ The maximum
application amount shown can be.applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Page: 7
6000 Oa uad0 livsUvad VTT8LC6Z9Z$. Z5:LO 66/01/20

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no .instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF„OPERATION
Page: 8
OTOO 00 Uad© "Ilysuvdd VTT8LCUZSZ.$ CS=LO 66/OT/90

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of. the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than to tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9
Me 0D Hdd0 ZZys2Idad 6TT8LC6Z5Z$ C5*L0 66/OT/20

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SFECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a mi.n4,"um and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients_ Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1. 1995 shall
comply with the following: vhe. outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters_
(See Standard 393 - Filter strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdowa facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10
ZTO[a 00 4H40 livsUvad VTTRLC6Z5ZQ ML0 66/OT/50

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECTFICAT19M
is. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plane which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a"rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element_ Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11
STOIJ 0D Hddo 11VSHVad VTTSLV6959,Q 65=L0 66/0T/90

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION_ PLAN AG$EE ENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be Submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm avent Less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and -at the office of the local, Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner; ROBERT L. JOHNSON
(Please print)
signature: ate: r
Name of Manager (If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)MARGARET KNIGHT
AffiliatiOW EDGECOBME SWCD phone No. 919-641-7900
Address (Agency): P O Box 14
TARBORO NC 27886-0010
Signature:
nat a.
Page: 12
I'Too 00 MddO Ilysuvad VTT9LC699Z4; fi9:L0 06/OT/90

-� _ • y4r x' ? +. �i�i�Lll"•' • , ,SIP
sir'_ _ ��•' 'S.. �:.-'� :.]�
''A4 -' i ;;;°-�`�;.a f'.,y"�-• „�i +s -•. Ri
� fir•^ -•fit• •t 7y yitc,.[�,. �
ll
RK�
r�
•� r.:j 4 ''R.'.,e�. Td e A ��1r� � ° � ,e F,i., .-I;: ', -.y1 i.r
`" ~ , ,�'• NOT TO SCALE
irr!��`�a �� �r'r: �'.. .� � �' �•-"��;i' fir. .J•'., '�'{' .,
��.��,� ' �! �•r. t' . •�'• ��, � ��';� li 5ii�'' r f '. �1''1t1'�y:l �y '.Ci�11Md� , "
SiJ.y{=::i: ,rt�,l �.sr Y+ �a• `, i'�"!• '-+''-
, i ,T ��yy i • ' St��.' i n a ' � �y,� �•,.•.. • �'...f �:
i•�
kw A
1.3
7.4
jr
fL
Ia a L
!{ L
a
i �
r �
R.<<r 00 tiE[d0 '['IVSgV3d irZZ8L�6ZSZ.Q•
1
9Zll01

06/02/99 07:46
6/2/99
Buster,
'&2529378114
PEARSALL OPER CO
Here is the wettable acre documentation that is under solid set sprinklers.
Robert L. Johnson
ra 001

N
0
0
64.90Q0
R4r,6aoa
wettalo�e acres 6.4 ac,
Nelson F-70 /9/32 n,oz,l
maximun spacing at 65%_
field design Installed :at
scale 1' = 200'
design by Wiley F. GiUa-m
60 psi =17k8 gpm & 64' rad,
= 832,
80' spacings
I1-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
REQUESTED
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
Farm Number: 33 - 30
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 31, 1998
\ 1V
Dear Robert Johnson:
You are hereby notified that Johnson Livestock, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C;,must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In'
accordance with apter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sine ly,
q6
jor A. reston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycle& 10% past -consumer paper
i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Mr. Bobby Johnson
Rt. 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
ffl?WA
IDIEHNFZ
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 13, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation for
Johnson Farm
Facility No. 33-30
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Johnson,
On May 2, an Operation Review was conducted of the Johnson Farm, facility no. 33-30. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.100, was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was at being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is enclosed for your
information. The following items were discovered and noted for corrective action or response:
There was no start/stop pumping marker in the lagoon but on S&WC district list. Please ensure
that the marker is inserted before 1998.
The lagoon sides had some small rat burrows that need to be filled and the vegetation present
requires maintenance.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concems or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Margar O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
John College, Hanor Farms
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27b09 N%q f C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
e��
C3EHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Johnson Livestock
Facility ID#: 33-30
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., ctor
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
04
P.O. Box 27687, W
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 r�C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 6, 1999
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
1 •1fflZW'A
IT •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330030
Johnson Livestock
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear Robert Johnson:
In accordance with your application received on September 22, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Robert Johnson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Johnson Livestock, located in Edgecombe County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2750 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for. this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

N,
,icate of Coverage AWS330030
,son Livestock
.ge 2
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final, and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincere
1
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Department
4R6l;eigh'Regional-Office -Wiia er-Quality;Section:::> �y
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District,
Permit File /
NDPU Files ��

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 31, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
Farm Number: 33 - 30
Dear Robert Johnson:
A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Johnson Livestock, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance Chapterwit626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
'owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality' Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Since ly,
v
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit file (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

T _ v
V State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for.completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Johnson Livestock
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Robert Johnson
1.3 Mailing address: Rt 2 Box 284
City, State: Rocky Mount NC T Zip: 27801
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-446-5374
1.4 County where facility is located: Edgecombe
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 5 miles SE of Rocky Mt. NC on RR 1224
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): scram
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/78
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 33 (county number);O (facility number).
p2.2 Operation Description: f nSwine operation
Feedeer to Finish
2750- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Wyes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Pouktry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: (,q 41 �e_ No. of Animals: q U
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 33 - 30

0
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 40.00 . Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 18
2.4 Number of agoons storage ponds (circle which is applicable):_
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or ®O (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
(& or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 19 7q _
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? q 71
REQUIRED -ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste, application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3. l2 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 33 - 30

-wl3i'RCiI.a'��
Facility Number: 33 - 30
Facility Name: Johnson Livestock
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for S3:0 C A (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete tot the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as inconM*te.
Signature Date
y lJ-- j�✓�J/
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, 1 C es )a e__*r 7-To \n , (Manager's name listed in question l .6), attest that this
application for >r,1.r`�o1 L_ ✓� S }d C ✓ (Facility name listed in question 1.1}
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplater-) - ' I/
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPOI!tFING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 33 - 30

ATTACHMZaz _a
r. U ! . :t • :i
Agri -Waste Ma--nagement
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK VASTLY SA1fFLL`iG. AHALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION BATES
James C. Barker*
1. SAXYLB COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lac Manure
I. Scraped directly from lot inca.spteader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface cruse
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
A. Liquid Manure Slurry
I. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2' nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure co pi: floor.
b. Saal upper end of conduit {e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lover end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket. or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from S or more locations or ac least I quart.
d. MU and add about 3/L pint to nonmetallic sample container.
IL. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. :take sure manure has been veil mixed vich a liquid manure
chopper•agi:acor pump or propeller agirazor.
b. lake subsarzzles from about 5 pic. locations, from agitator pu=P
or .`_om manure spreader and place '_n a plasc:c bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agr:cultural :ngincering
Department, ;torch Carolina Scate University. Raleigh. :;C.

AT T AC KkENT B
2 of 3
C. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush Banks in a nonmetallic sample container.
Si. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pine or less) on end of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within l' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litcer
I. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g..
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsasmplas at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g.. if 20% of litter of similar visual'qualicy is
around feeders and waterers, cake 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsampLes from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect liete.r from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth Floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket. mix. and add
about-2-3 lbs litter cc a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
U. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations ac lease 18' into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs cc nonmetallic sample container and seal.

t P:17LAI� .KMZN.T kf-
�' 3 of 3
II. SAME PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into.an expandable container that can be scaled. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any ocher Way,
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer ea Lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
I. AAL Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Vhitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond. VA 23237 Wheeling. IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Vinton Road
Raleigh. NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, VI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
I. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plahc/Vaste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box Z7647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
U. Forward $4 along with the sample.
ILL. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, ecc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on 'litter: etc.)
c. Wasce type (dais' -lot scraped manure, Liquid slurry: swine -pit
slur:f, la3oor. 1:qu:d, sludge: broiler -house liz:er. stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N. P, K, Ca. Mg. Ma.
S. Fe, fin, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: Dh. ho, Cd, Ni, Pb

SCs ..,**
• - 11110193 -
LAGOON SUMMARY SHEET & TYPICAL -CROSS=SECTION
SINGLE STAGE"LAGOON
Top Width
Z
Settled Top. of Dam: .$ �. �, �- s! Construct Top' of Dam
• � rk �klc r, c k;�" 1
Fill Yardage: 2,CMG
II 5
td
Slope f ' Slope
2
15,9oTy�-'
Natural Ground-Elev.
Cut-off Trench w�t.;,yr
Depth determined by
SCS on site
Width depends on equipment--
rn
Start land application Stop land application
r
9� elev. y F, elev. y'f,"
Bent T
--Temporary Storage -Volume / 5---4---cu. ft. --
Support-------------------------------------------
Treatment Volume 28'64-�p4 cu. ft.
3 Top of sludge elev.-
lev. ~--�
------------------------------I--
Sludge Volume. /
sottom elev. 3 5 �` = `''
Lagoon size (inside top):
Length 3 2 S Width 22 5 Cu. Yds. Excay.
Bench Mark Description: C (, cx_ j 2 we s f C.oei. r4 (, Q
C.
Elevation: 0,e0
General Information
Engineering Job Class: ly
Hazard Class:
Animal Type: (.J + ►ti) E
Type Operation: p )LS , J_
Number of Animals: I p
TE: If construction is not started
.thin one year, this plan is not valid
until a re-evaluation of the design and
flood plain safety hazards are made.
Lagoon for Animal Waste
Farm
County
�'Al Q�� t., co Ica a - State
U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
Designed
Approved
Title: _
Date:
by:
by:

wvv�C Suma4- �3obs+� �Ju�
i3u"(l ;v5 Re' d yd 3
5 J
y c. o cju�— r �;( y( v e�a-5 `- 171 q'g l d .s
3
`� Y f L P f •` t N 1` `!• i *' . f G GH (� I [J %` PL. .�S' ! -0/10 f. -.1
}

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE � NC--ENG-12
Soil Conservation Service 6-82
EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET
EARTH EMBANKKENT
Dame PyAce f Jo�hSy ti -
Address
Embankment: Top Width Z Side Slopes
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
( Feet)
END AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
SUM OF
END AREAS
(Sq. Ft.)
DISTANCE
( Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
(Cu. Ft. )
HN
3 2
I32-
100
3 00
i1w
r31
1 314
2,S
1
!0(�
pzBL
. 3
y 7
D a
T7ao
3
3162
2 �
S�
2. 300
3. 3
7 G
3,2
13
3I
L!2 S
? 2.
151
l
r.5 Iv0
S
L%
1. Double Volume of Fill t 2 = 7%, a S) Cu. Ft.
2. Volume of embankment fill (line 1 - 27) l- / Cu. Yds.
3. Allowance for settlement (5 or LO% of line 2)1- Cu. Yds.
4. Total cubic yards (line 2 + line 3) = Cu. Yds.
Computed by (/lam Date N 2
ram•
Checked by Date

1 /1

Ll
z
G
s�7
r

i
THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME _-----_------____----___> Bobby Johnson
COUNTY ==--___-________-___--_-_____--_> Edgecombe
TODAYS DATEOct. 5,1994
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE —>
1600 FEET
NUMBER -OF PIGS
WEANLING TO FEEDER =====>
0
NUMBER OF PIGS
FEEDER TO FINISH =---===>
1920
NUMBER -OF SOWS
FARROW TO WEANLING =====>
0
NUMBER OF SOWS
FARROW TO FEEDER =__====>
0
NUMBER OF SOWS
FARROW TO FINISH =-=--==>
0
DEGREE OF ODOR
CONTROL
1.0
(minimum 1.0
cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
(maximum 3.0
cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF YEARS
OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
5.0 YEARS
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =---___> .300.0 FEET
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL = =_-__> 200.0 FEET
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =-_____--_> 47.5 FEET
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__> 47.0 FEET
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION --_____--______=> 39.5 FEET
Depth of Permanent Water 8.0 feet
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES3.0:1
Permanent Volume Required 362880.0 cubic feet
Permanent Volume Provided 390144.0 cubic feet
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET> 0 SQUARE FEET
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE _______________> 180 DAYS
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY ====> 0 GALLONS
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =====> 13.4 INCHES
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =_____-_______> 6.7 INCHES
FREEBOARD--W==________________________> 1.0 FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION ===---==> 51.6 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume 185414.2 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 51.6 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 324.6 feet Width = 224.6 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation = 49.9 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 47.5 feet
Volume To Be Pumped -- 144708.9 cubic feet

SCS-IN{r-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Re,. 5-10 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME_P 6 DISTRICT
DATE COUNTY—
S. C. S. PH TO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT _— a.-L,ero
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMEIN"IS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND —ACRES TOTAL. ACRES PAfkt3 CLASS WORK UNIT CONSER TIT: IST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale 111-feet)
Locate reference point in center line of dam and 1denNly on skelck
I
I
i
311
1
I I
I
SHOW 1 1 LIP, 2 f_t - -q , 7 BORING `UMBER AND PROFILE � 3 y�•
ie and list dam•eitt 4SJ tvillway bn�npf frrff • then pondrd area and borrvw pit bormos • separate with yer cal rod fine.
DEPTIT! tCnnfrnurd an back wAt" necesta:li Shaw wafer table elevatin-a nn dam -site bo inps.
l�lm
.
rWE'Nowulm"MIMMIU
MIMIM
gLYAM'9�
�IOMINI■IZINSIMEARNE10
10
IM
IME1010
I®1�;�'1•IMI0
SIMON
"MMINIM01,01
Milo
1®I�I�I�i
I®i
' . �l0rSim
� �° Sm
Bf1R1tif;S 'SSA BSIGNATURE & TITLE Q

1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 head weanling to feeder x 30 lbs. = 0 lbs
1920 head feeder to finishing x 135 lbs. 259200 lbs
0 sows farrow to weanling x 433 lbs. 0 lbs
0 sows farrow to feeder x 522 lbs. = 0 lbs
0 sows farrow to finish x 1417 lbs. - 0 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 259200 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of slud4e accumulation in design? 5.0
Sludge Volume = 103680.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF. LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 362880.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 47.5 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 39.5 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 8.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH =
300.0 200.0 60000.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
252.0 152.0 38304.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm)
276.0 176.0 48576.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
60000.0 194304.0 38304.0 1.333
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL=90144.0 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED 362880.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 300.0 FEET LONG BY . 200.0 FEET WIDE

5. DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation 51.6 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width
324.6 224.6 72905 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 72905 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 259200 SSLW * 0.0101481 gallon/lb. SSLW/day
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 63298.1 cubic feet
6B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that
recycle the lagoon water are accounted for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) = 13.4 inches
Volume = 13.4 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 81410.8 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 40705.4 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 63298.1 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 81410.8 cubic feet
6D. 40705.4 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 185414.2 cubic feet

7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Volume of temporary storage divided by surface
area of lagoon.
Depth required = 185414 cu.ft. / 60000 sq. ft.
Depth required = 3.1 feet
Normal_ lagoon liquid elevation = 47.5 feet
Depth required = 3.1 feet
Freeboard = 1.0 feet
Top of Dam -- 51.6 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 51.6
ARE 324.6 FEET BY 224.6 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 63298.1 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 81410.8 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 144708.9 cubic feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of lagoon at normal water level.
Depth required = 144708.9 cu.ft. / 60000.0 sq. ft.
Depth required = 2.4 feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:'
DATE: DATE:

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRIICTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON
Producer: �� 0 b �ac.' J 0_4i It se 11
Clearing: "All trees and brush shall be removed from the
impoundment area before construction is started: The foundation
of the lagoon shall be cleared of all trees, stumps, roots,
brush, sod, organic soil, and debris. All stumps and all roots
exceeding 1 inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth
of 1 foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris.
After clearing is completed the foundation area shall be loosened
thoroughly and roughly leveled, with suitable equipment, before
placement of any embankment material.
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated to a minimum
depth of If inches under the embankment. The exact depth shall
be determined on site by SCS. The trench side slopes shall be
1:1 or flatter and the width will be a minimum of 6 feet, but
will depend on the a uipment being used. The cutoff trench shall
be backfilled with Se- material. The trench shall be
backfilled in 9 inch layers and compacted with a sheepsfoot
roller with a minimum of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift.
If sheepsfoot roller is not used, the trench shall be backfilled
in 4 inch layers and compaction shall be equivalent to or better
than the routing of the hauling and spreading equipment over the
fill in such a manner that every point on the surface of each
layer of fill will be traversed by not less than one tread track
of the loaded equipment traveling in a direction parallel to the
main axis of the fill. All standing water shall be removed from
the trench before backfilling is started.
Existing Tile Drains: When tile drains are encountered, the the
will be dug up and removed. The tile trench shall be backfilled
with a compacted layer of CL or CH material.
Excavation: Topsoil shall be stocked piled separately for later
use. The bottom of the lagoon shall be excavated as shown on the
plans. Where pervious material (SP �Mquartz veins, etc.) is
exposed during excavation, it shall be undercut a kfilled
with a compacted layer of highly plastic (CL, CH)materia �'- 1eA✓y 5C
approximately one foot in thickness. Scarify and compact the
bottom and, where practicable, the side slopes of the lagoon to
decrease the permeability of the soil in the lagoon. 6oz56,? �
Pa�sr(o/y ,�l �%C i�r,d� u�hem r/� d n c4 v Oslo �/ ;.�% h e
EdMk�enCd%s�suction: The ma��p1 ce °fin the embani�menaC/e.
shall be free of sod, roots, stones over six (6) inches in
diameter, and other objectionable materials. S'G,GL
materials shall be used in the embankment. Pervious material
shall not be used in the embankment. Construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 4 inches in
thickness. Compaction shall be equivalent to or better than the
routing of the hauling and spreading equipment over the fill in
such a manner that every point -on the surface of each layer of
fill will be traversed by not less than one tread track of the
1

r
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON
loaded equipment traveling in a direction parallel to the main
axis of the fill. If pans are not used, construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 9 inches in
thickness and compacted with a sheepsfoot roller with a minimum
of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift. At any time the
embankment surface becomes "slickened" such that the succeeding
layer'will not bond to the previous layer, scarify the previous
layer sufficiently to.assure bonding of the surfaces before
continuing with the fill operation. Construction of the fill
shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content
of the fill material will permit a reasonable degree of
compaction. Construction of the embankment shall allow an
additional .9 % for settlement. Stock piled topsoil shall be
spread over top of embankment and outside side slopes for the
establishment of vegetation.
Pollution Control During. Construction: . Stripping of embankment
and borrow areas shall be done as they are needed in a normal
sequence of construction.' Use temporary mulch protection on all
disturbed areas that are subject to erosion and will not have
substantial additional work performed for 30 days.
Vegetation: Vegetation shall be established on the slopes,
embankment top and all other disturbed areas, except the area
that will be inundated, as specified in the plans as soon as
possible after construction. Necessary steps shall be taken to
ensure that a good stand of vegetation is established in a
reasonable amount of time.
Seeding rates are: So lb. /3ac'-it_ lea rS �
Q lb. F!�.rr _
K lb. 10-10-10 �Gr 'e—
tons lime
tons wheat straw
Permanent Stake: A permanent stake (CCA salt treated 411x4" post
or 1 inch diameter PVC pipe with tee) marked t,o indicate pumping
level elevations, shall be placed in the inside slope at one end
of the lagoon.
2

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN _FOR _SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Producer: I J d b qc, c i 0 h I U vL
The purpose of -this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
routine operation and maintenance work. needed to keep this swine waste
management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
to beauty, -usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: 13ak;a fescut cou.. P,7 t .`Cmg is being
established on these areas. Beginning in 199s and each year
thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds
of 10-10--10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
1

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
B. Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total of
o Q; *e8- (e«de ' to TQg ) . The lagoon contains both
permane t and temporary 'stora e. 'The permanent storage is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The.
design includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste produced over 180 days, the amount of rainfall in a
25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage;
therefore, it will need to be pumped every six months. Begin pump -
out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation Lj__�_tr as marked
by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches
elevation 4'7, r .
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to insure the waste
is applied as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -charged
to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during start-up. Pre -
charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants
into waters of the United States. The Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management,
has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
2

Telephone:
Type operation:
-Number of Animal Units:
3A14i, Teltiliot,
s:,I- G 'M 1,2 z,q sie a x G
Ills. 27(�lJl
1 it1 r •e � ��.f�t' �1v — —
�yzv
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged
so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crops.to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year.
Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface
waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior
to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements
may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
Amount of waste produced per year
J9 2 Q animal units X .2 7 waste/animal unit/year =
779 B 4 D waste/year
If I
Amount _of_nitrogen produced per year
/ 2 O animal units X
lbs . N/year
2,3
lbs. N/animal unit/year =
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
page 1

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
0K-1,r�
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Real. Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
if Type Yield Per Ac Utilized Application
alz
I
Gad
r'sr�e
4, o4
i F�
3 i. q
s d sz
Z-
N ISr.^
NO
4 4
Bey �,d
6;04-to
270
3. zr 3
3
GJW
�`� ��
.o ,s
2 7 d
[ `f
378
`l
&A
�.
404c4,,
z7v
3.5
Umat
150
.z v
3 1 G U
.Total Table 1
%3 3Y8
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
Tract Field Soil Crop Real. Lbs. N Acres. Lbs. N Month of
# Type Yield Per Ac Utilized Application
Total Table 1
Total Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced
Surplus of Deficit
y /�
c3 2-
Your facility is designed for lXi�7 days of temporary storage and
needs to have the temporary storage removed every months.
Wt+wACA
Tewtlx�
�V. rZ,
D5w L
Page 2

Where owners of animal operations do not have adequate amounts of
land to -apply the waste, the producer must provide a written
agreement whereby another landowner has agreed to land apply or'
allow land application - on his or her land.
Call -the Soil Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation
District office after you receive the waste analysis report to
obtain the amount per acre to apply and the application rate prior
to applying the waste.
Narrative Operation:.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the disposal of
waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.)
Z
Lon
O
2.12
U
614�
Page 3

WASTE MANAGEMENT LAN AGREEMENT
I agree to carry out. this waste management plan according to the
terms of the agreement. Failure to comply with the waste management
plan will automatically require any cost share funds to be refunded
to their source.
I understand that Mr./Mrs. � does not have
ample land to apply the animal waste produced from his/her animal
operation. I have agreed to utilize the waste produced from the
operation and agree to carry out this waste management plan on land
that I own or operate.
Recipient Landowner: Date:
`+-��''
System Designer: Date: ? 3� 9
SWCD Representative: Date:
Design Approval: Date:
Page 4

EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PLAN
ROBERT L. JOHNSON
ROUTE 2, BOX 284
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27801
252/446-5374
THE HANOR COMPANY
876 Country Club road
Rocky Mount, NC 27804

", EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
LAGOON/PIPELINE FAILURE:
1. Contact Person (s):
• Office:
• Pager 7
• Home if
2.
NI)Ifft
• Office a/
• Pager
• Home
3.
9
• Office
• Pager
• Home
• Office
• Pager
• Home
H. Situation Evaluation and Solution:
1. Assess situation at hand. Contact the appropriate above personnel to notify of
situation.
2. Contact secondary personnel essential for required corrective action. A list of
contact numbers for employees that should be available is attached.
3. Obtain needed equipment. See list of equipment suppliers attached. (bulldozers,
backhoe, pumps and portable pipe) `
4. Contain discharge. Prevent any discharge from entering surface waters or leaving
facility property, if possible.
1

5. Temporarily repair/stop source of problem. (breach damaged pipe, and leaks).
Keep in mind these repairs are temporary and will need to be properly repaired at
a later time.
6. Note details of incident, location or direction of movement of spill, weather and
wind conditions, corrective measures taken and situation seriousness.
III. Notify Appropriate Agencies:
1. Division of Water Quality (DWC)
Contact Person:
• Office Q/p ` 221 ` :s('ZGb
• After Hours -- -
• Needed information:
Name, facility telephone number, details of incident, exact location of facility,
location or direction of movement of spill, weather/wind conditions,
corrective measures taken, and situation seriousness.
2. Local EMS and police (in the event of spill leaving property or entering surface
waters).
• County: Edgecombe Phone #: [phone]
3. Contact Local Health Department
• County: Edgecombe Phone #: [phone]
IV. Permanently Repair Problem:
1. The problem must be repaired to a state equal to or exceeding that prior to
discharge. This may require a redesign of the component in the system. Contact
AWT as questions arise.
2. Properly note repairs that are performed at the facility for future reference.
3. AWT should inspect any lagoon breach repair prior to lagoon being placed back
into service.
V. - Official Reports and Responses:
1. Send written notice to DWQ explaining situation and how it is being handled.
2

2. Draft needed reports for the governing agencies. Contact AWT for any needed
assistance.
Request written responses from governing agencies that indicate situation and
resulting actions are concluded.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571 - 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-641 7843
SWCD 919-641-7900
NRCS 919-641--7900
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow --possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all additional flow to the lagoon.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field- actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.

14
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-571-4700• After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters. surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-641--7843•
n
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES,�phone number 919-641-7915, local SWCD
office phone number 919-641-7900, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-641-7900.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that
person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site -damage.
a. Contractors Name: F"er Anderqon _ ^
b. Contractors Adress: Tarboro. NC
c . Contractors Phone: [phone]

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: _ A, Ya. W�-LL'n-&y, -
b. Phone: GAI--1gno
the
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.

.-r ..--.?r � ,�+ ;•e�.�,5�, "i r�r3ri 1t�,,N��� �t„�r}�C+,�4 xf,;� �aV,SJ��'t ,�'✓� •.�'��r � �. .,� '�
t{r �.�': '. , ��-f;r" .•� r i� A 4,'[. r�+F h�l' i 1' , 'r
'.F`'�r * Y '�,'1 l '" � °� hs � • � r � ` ,My } J Y'l,^+ •+ilYU� . '+'` �'' ,,, w � '� � ��+
'�� '' ��'x {�e[�J 7 ' .4 �' `'���� Jr ,,' .,►r �' 1sa� i�"; '�'i)• '• �+k� K• s" '
.. � r�v'� � 7 1 � �r,�1ti' r * + ,� r A � r t [t ,a'ti � {* l�` Y �x..' � � •,�.;tn , � • 1',• ..;.�y,rc•�s,;'"�oy • "�. S,dr':�s�•;t' ��yr.` g'y 1' �''�' '�':�y: , .Yr.�s. .. .:,�..,_
;�r 1L ,.416 ,,, 1+%�. a � fay •��+ sr•`r�LL+p: L ' ':'./i� ! �, - .� ? , �,/L�•�.r�,,� ..
-•�, r ;iwi } Ayr f , c S [' aP YZ t'P j i" dde 3 '1,
' f 44rt, NOT TO SCALE
IN
Man
14(
3r�i- .L i•!� J,7 i 11r -�,�' `fir„# # 6 w �Lti x 1 � •jL„w J r i J lr e 1 1yA�y� k'�# � r�,�v ,�>� �i ' '�;• ' ' ..
♦. rh,�.ie'rt ' Y• ..Y1', a. 417rr7,y,� ,�.�j;�i61 t,i:'' J �' ��"� i1',..�-,:r.A-,_�!�' �� rLa� ;
' ,�.. ���'�" . r Ia' • '�`'r1C1r,y, • �:� �7 • ' � (r j ' r'\."t, h.a ..{;...,. f ysr ,
1'�+�+j�;y�,„;i ±,�.,' L fJ��y'M � � �i � �ri'� �'+t * �5. taj�'{ �d•i I r'� 2 •'� �!, �
+t3 '`.• •. J �T J � } • ,��'( tl �l�T't� I�`r.: F �wx:� ���"J.t �,A:.�'.:,M�: ..
;F,r,�: r.•rF"'', ,1,x4,f`(iriiy{1l/).Y�trJ�G���s+w' rye.�,r�'{,,y'z."St`,"+3a'g;y?�;;
--�'��� + �t, e+, ,. �t •.}.P1w_ „�r 11}4 �.! f_'s,,��6Y•�'7+•4�1i'y` `1i,lt, f�� k.l. G }� /y� ..
�y�A` ' i � � '�;' v'f. }1 ti•' Ih�'� it
011
S, �, r 'f ,�• i .}! i � i � ,t��,rj','1'SrrPI'�� .'i�/ 7R �� ,{'.
I S• ' } ... 14
I ' 27.3 J� 44 �• —i'`` �. 1` r tt•9r'� r
• + + �� r � � ,. fir'. ,r
1.4
ri
145
l ` 1 L
q... � � . ire �4si • [ r�
orr
1
t

r "iIyETBr
1biGh.y.�Ok'1F,t
- .s4'
_ �
- �' - ,; Sy' ' ` ,tt6 ;'
i�'`�i `i{ ,..
\
� l 'U" " s�,� f
i�- 44 � t t �...-� ' ��'�
•. �"„-'- +" t_ if i�
`.*:-__•+ '.--�,_. i33{{ I.y �t a
wW
'�' aka �5 {,-A'r ��"'�^Y
E :� 1 k s;�!i',�. gi'y*'St1+..�+1g�
LA
H rg '�Tp '"! fir/
.�%Y
!
1''y Yq ti• ,a O
,�%'-'r7 -'
j l f '� t ``{'
'.- "y
w ��`
i. �+ 1 •t i'
Y- ,`i�£ �� -•
y
'f wt,. Ada
`a
it f '^tn\k-
4�,
• s rT.i=
�'
�
Jyth !11 ,}'�
�
.+ '.'�JZ 5`•�' 'ff'
�y�� f
I �1�7 ,
i '�'. `• 1 ���^.,
J,6i� �.�'��� � �+. �^�r�. 1
� `'Y¢
z�:�
a$� 1' 1
t`'.�',yvi:.
? x�
+"�`N �
i"v'SS+Y,ytiC+'.�
ti^,?r fi `�
� �f � x.. 1s� ^
_. • µ
• !
{\j�J
"'i. - �
tii'. :y`9a:
rl 4�^ -�Il"r f
u-+V!'J''��' r/ '�""t' F iet
¢
�
,,'r' fs.i1�'s d.•
xf(j� " ` L If
�
�,.; yV^
�"�'" L � ('
�t''5 l�" V"�' �, k� kf
A—
�' :.--e:il
�A _ •.•li•
n >• £ q "� t,.
aL .,a 11 %jr�
- � �.
! i
_..'_
�. a 2' r 1 i ' '4
..� ��S'q I�}�� `µ 5 �'
���.n
'� "�. I r.:: • lrr- -.; tiL,'s
�yy�:.l, if0�f P�:s ��'.�+Y,�`��a� �
EA ^' �....�- _
P-,
� .•�.. f
�i'' 'N.,
y��p. `•r.r_ y rt'
cw• a �
- t..l.
� � � T .� � a 1 Y
� S
o mac¢—��- � �
✓,
� rr '� i'
�'�r� ,[Apt
�
�
:i
1 y,1'�yrh.Z,fsl
a��y� f4 4 A•S
ty P �`c�'Al �'��..'�} y'��Y�
�._"r".�
_ _- .+%: � - hA� s+•
�''�:i �`:iF �: �� �
it }�'�
Tt , 4i
rFi1' �� S�
'1.•..
nn��y�cl
F�R�{. S _ Y `��T:
M, �S'
saw' ✓ S�
_ _ .uF+... �/5. �
i y;�
�Ns.
i
{1 n ••y.
u }4 r,
�' tt�r h ^ ,v
Mb 1 i }� ta.� � { na
" f sfir�
h�`•'< 'y IF.d.! A
`'e�.t/ �-„� !`fi-
�
1 �3,:-
�M 4��lk
�/0 _ .
- �a �•_ 'fit
,. l;
+t y
d
d
•�1;.��
:
-
yi, `� y
� \\. \��r � m -
,,�jh.
1t,�
��I r�r��5�;
k. "`,;,}�+. if M
V.0�
r.i'-F yV.� }, _1 a r
ht��� ��h._ i �IY,Q 3-.�3� s' '�-s., fis
*s -
� �� • ��
r"ir...l+ ... -', ..- s'r"�'-
1H 4e1� p I F I
^;:,'I � ;� ° +
r
`'4'r
� i-f-V�;t"F�'
--f p� �pr'�'
4 r
t, �.: 1( '''J Y,-t
•..`a 4�.' � 1 -.
i>S�"��. ��r`�� .F�rs�'.,, -
`
.r}
Lr,a
��zk'
_N•-'
•
1 m)4"+; 1,11
�'1
€{x
�',s16 1P -. '�
1
W) "`` a.°'�'
d�a dt t
'�,�,w�, i'- r a
t,'�s�
^,
O ``� rp .i SS Yd �:'
i'c �»
S'/i -_'�
A � 1 � ��' ,., ..i'• \ '.
� - r 2 r„v
!.'
� • '._a_
a^0 - • 1 !"'
�_}{ i.'
-��� hk T 1` �'� i C
,� aglsv �S a�
�` � .k'�T� �I, S ,
( ��
t�
i�Yl
A.li S�?.-•.
t
.'ter. \ r •;� t
w s
u
,jr/
J
� -�i �'� �i•i 'fir l�i+
�-_ 9 � �'k k fs al u
r IF' h� r111taS 1
.d IGt� �i .�.#` G �,, YY4. I �
�'�=-- , I
'� - --� _-d• �
•`'1' � t 'ram '•1 '•f' rt �s„
�•'� . �` �' 61 r 5i �u� t �p
��s,�� � '�,r€
� �. j''l'
Y
'fpy
F.Y
vr C:
}r. 5j�rrF+�t�'
%4
-CfYhh-
... _tl
I \\
V \`
1
`l sr 1
x '�¢Ifwry
�.4'�'S °f
d�h 1. � �•3F}yV4
f 017s+�
i A+� 5� L ,.
T
kt �• 1r" �--5r
�i
J'', '",�i5`
'� ( ,
�i�� r7 S1�
4„^"°,"t� �,vr ++'y0�ro,tt
YET
s sks,
•-,. �S
zfi { -'ng 14,E
- - �f _,.. -
- ki y� �r�.�
�'� l• ii ' ,�'� ,'~�
° '� ``
3"+`
s �,.. 1
41 1 l5"',t` .�. ;1.� t�
-F' ��.lCf( Z �" I
.G II • k'•" a
,��(= ; .
'
fYi
rl`7
w`YMR
p �Yt� rx`��,h�i:
� ��f,rr'�
�: �� : 3z
ns ��, y�, •�� �. v n'ga
.
����������
.'J
� ����"'.j •�.� .._ '`fp 11,,
y'\ '
- I �}� �"'���£:k�'a3 +
if>.-4 � �' 2�
�, ,yr ^} 8 J �
r` s �S-�� -5.{, - -
�
-.�'d`
�� ��
7msarr��
7 ¢ r
tYhy. ./%✓ �"
\ � '
f �.
/� ��-,!'� �
,� a. � � 1\��i�r�1� hsOM'-ti',s+
���:?:���.
l.,i �•• I� .. .:r'
.I ,�
1' '-�': ur,!'r�: xt9
�
1 -?Y� ,I�. 1+a 1 aL
,� h:
4 ,w��
(j�,'c'fy,
1 ��J ""n-'i•
I �
a,,..-- • C?
f•t v �y
•
� w +.1
as ayy iu
isi aFk
I.k Kc "p+k Y113" ,' ,.ry,, -�;yK f^.e..
��
y. y,
! tj
w M +.r ' .^'_"�j.,',"h.
_
I Tom
4 �
/.��
a
� s r � � �� � -
�t>t[S' _ �j
�
toot
'�g�J�-
r5L.� r%
��
r'"f ry!}I
lyy
4,ya{
r`Ic4r?
l4,L
�,�7f.F
�1 t �- f`r I ' �
rt1. ,-f
,�.^yy':, `Y�5�(wS�*''Y- s-- - a
�1 >
���.�,•..iIl
`4�i� r
'`+,
✓-��` t'. .�� .�
./ r ?„�
m, sNr c e
� y^ 1 1 �rTl --
�:# �
{

i•
—=---�-'�Insect'Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause [IMPS to Control [Bisects Site SIIccific Praclims - —
F1us11 butlers • Accumulation of
ds o
11 O
!:lush sysleni is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids front
gutters as designed,
,lternove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and fits • Crusted Solids 19 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
cnisling of solids to a depth of no snore than 6 -
$ inches over more than 3R% of surface.
I_xccssivc Vegetative . Decaying vegetaliun r-sr Maintain vegetative control along banks of
t 1invill lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative utalter
along waives edge on iniponndmenl's perimeter.
Dry Systems
I cc�I�rs • Feed spillage _ Resign, uperale und,maiwain feed systems (c.g.,
bunkers and Iroubbs) to minimize the
_/�ccluuulation of decaying wastage.
G� Clean tip spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during sulmner 15-36 day interval
Suring winter).
ecd Storage r Accumulations of feed residues f_* Itcdoce Moisture 11CCaatllaIIalion wilhiu and
around itnnicciiate perimeter of Ii cd slorage
areas by insuring drainage away front silt
andlor providing adctImile contaimtent (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
loislure grain pruducls).
w! Inspect for and reniove: or break up accumid ated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
11ceded.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page I

Saurcc Cause Urvirs to Unntrol Insects Nile Niecllic l'racliceY
Animal I lolding Areas
+ Accumulations of animal wastes 13 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
: O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal bolding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Diy h1amire I laudling
Accumulations of animal wastes CI Remove spillage on a routine basis (c % - 10
Sy'r��us
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for IURLI
application or disposal.
0 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
O Inspect for and remove or breakup accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure Handling areas as needed.
For nwre iulurmation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Flux 7613, North Carolina Scala: l luiversity,
Italcigh. NC, 27695.7613.

7
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor' Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead !o Swine production egetWve or wooded buffers;
Recommended best management practices;
GY" Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces �b Dirty manure -covered animals ,,Pry floors
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors Vlotted floors;
Waterers located over slotted floors;
�eeders at high end of solid floors;
Scrape manure buildup from floors;
O underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; far Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition -or scrape; '
❑ Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; Gr an maintenance;
Dust VEff'icient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust
Washdown between groups of animals;
Feed additives;
❑' ceder covers;
®Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers ~
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon �I `
O
Flush tank covets;
liquid while tanks are filling I K
p
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
• Agitation during wastewater A���
❑
Underfloor hush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance 1"
Pit recharge points
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid filling 01k
C]
Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
while pits are
with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
• Agitation during slurp tank .1i,4
❑
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown 1'
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Sox covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC -November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Od6r Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at a Agitation during wastewater 13 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; Gr VQ
oper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing,
rrect lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when.pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
� roven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; Gr VA
rrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles . Wind driftmimurn recommended operating pressure;
VPu*mp intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Boaom,or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying 0 Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
❑
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge •
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets .
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, • •
Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
surfaces
❑
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑ Yroven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition 2" Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
Incinerators • Incomplete combustion
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4
I
❑ Proper location/construction of disposal pits
0 Secondary stack bumers

Source . Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • improper drainage; Ur Grade and landscape such that water drains - - -
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance T -
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information:
Available From :
Swint Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-89
NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300..feet from any Bowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
Dear Robert Johnson:
4 •
NCDEINR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 22, 1998
Subject: Application No. AWS330030
Additional Information Request
Johnson Livestock
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by January 21, 1999:
The lagoon capacity documentation and Waste Utilization Plan provided appear to only
be for 1920 Feeder to Finish animals, however the permit application and certification for
this facility is for 2750 Feeder to Finish animals. Please submit additional lagoon
capacity documentation and a Waste Utilization Plan for 2750 animals if you wish to be
permitted for 2750 Feeder to Finish animals.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before January 21,
1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject .animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission:
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sue ^Hornewood - 1 .
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality.
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27665-0535 Telephone [phone] µ:FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AMrmative-Action Employer w' -. " '50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

........................ ........ ......
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
...................... 1-1- ............................ ............................. ................................................................................................... .......... .......... - ........ ............
Producer: �� v ��` `F L o M s o v\�
Location: �e- c S� 2 Z
Rk73�4pu� &r.�, 2-�o1
Telephone: (2 s z.) 4 y 6 `S 3 7 q
Type Operation:
Number of Anhnal Units: 1 7 s U
The waste from your animal facility must be .land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.
Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can
be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan
in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that
it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based
on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons
per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land
eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid
drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than
30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be
based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility.
Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management
Commission

0
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Ye_arLgallons,_ tons,_etc_.)_
Z 75yq►
_ animals X / 2 1 gal. waste/animal/year = I5 q9 I , 2-SO gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
2750 animals X2, 3 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 413 2 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type " Per Ac.* Utilized Application
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is.cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996, the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2))
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
*See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 41.1 11 GO
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced ,3 2
Deficit +— rjg
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich
and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of
nutrients or other elements.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste
water.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application'
Amount(In.)
J3 L4
NDi- IVd
e-SC a e
a C,�
I,U
/3ev,,uudgi
G 4
0-
This table is not needed it waste Is not being applied by irrigation. however a siritila r table will be needed for dry litter or sludge.
Your facility is designed for V/g-0da s of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every JO J1040 dAcoS
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your strAicture
exceed FEET BELOW THE LOWEST POINT IN THE DIKE.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
Narrative of Operation:
7TLe. old oveva4,'o''� ��s 9� d�� s1�ov���
7� �lGw aP�ra �� has �8D da�s .s'F-srdc� F cjeS"gAte.{

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written
agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for
the life expectancy of the production facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase
in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application of other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more
tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that grassfilter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard
393 - Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.

..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
WASTE UTILIZATION LIZATI O N PLAN
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crops planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any
perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal).
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial
waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a
land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should
not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water
.courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall beapplied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation
such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to.be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution
and erosion.

.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
...._....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:.............................................
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption it should be applied preplant
with no further applications of animal waste during the cropping season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment
lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage
volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within GO days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels
in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used
when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records
shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records
shall be maintained for three years. Waste application records for all
other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North carolina
regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
a
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Rv4o eN`E' L . T o kotL ati
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-
hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and
at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner. (Please print) i?u Ae v4 L ' J C S o
Signature:r
Name of Manager (If different from owner:
Signature:
r
Technical Representative:Rease print) R • �_ Lc�� ,`� (erg
Date:
Date:
Affiliation: L- USDA,NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Address (Agency):_ P.O. Box 10 --
Tarboro, NORTH CAROLINA 27886
Signature: V1 v�����c.�(�,r� Date:

✓ �"� ,���� �•. L, r i "s �s itt, ff s .? '��q�1]�'��,"rS33Sf�� ,3 y '
.. 11; a �{ fJ;)liy_�4 �' 1��� '- . - ,i •S'V..x•+� �xi'$����:' 7V. ..-.,wfii .. ...
-clx
}JiNOT r' y;f�''C• F ` ; >r, -':ti1j i;t L`='•iL ///�
VII
To
SCALE
,,�e_'.``�`�'��}: �'• s ��' �,' ,dry,.. ..,+ *���,�t 'M}�"� '�� ��
VI Ile
14
13
}y.�[',r.'lr ,y �': ,y}y�a �i�'1'' hIl .S�`, .t;�a•�. 5:.n r�i•k �m: �3-`, L4t' ..�*�C�• t
r `v "rap M
14
IS
Ur
7.4
r I r+ 10.1
5.4
)•`. is � � .' �
' �t N'

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
March 19, 1999
Robert Johnson
Johnson Livestock
Rt 2 Box 284
Rocky Mount NC 27801
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANp NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS330030
Additional Information Request
Johnson Livestock
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Robert Johnson:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 18,
1999:
1. The lagoon capacity documentation provided appears to only be for 1920 Feeder to Finish
animals, however the permit application and certification for this facility is for 2750 Feeder to
Finish animals. Please submit additional lagoon capacity documentation if you wish to be
permitted for 2750 Feeder to Finish animals.
2. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) shows the application window for Fescue as April —
October. This does not appear to correspond with information that the Division of Water Quality
has regarding Fescue application windows. Please have a technical specialist verify that the
Fescue application window is accurate as written in your current WUP or revise it as necessary.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The
information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before April 18, 1999 or the Division will return
your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to
be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1. and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

RFD 2, Box 284
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
May 5, 1999
Ms. Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
SUBJECT: Application No. AWS330030
Additional Information Request
Johnson Livestock
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Ms. Homewood:
Please find enclosed information on my old lagoon and revised Waste Management Plan
as per A. B. Whitley. I hope this will take care of the information you need, if not, please
let me know.
I am sorry for the delay in sending this information to you.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Johnson
J
Enclosures

Sp
6661
L
sZ, o• o� r e z
'9
-Z ¢e4 ng L f Z.
. zr
r`_ Z /+oz

v '-A
.01
C,7 &
:Cis

6 �
_zn r 6
z�G" B6
�z Iz
� l.s `
1 z' lz
A i
A.
T3.01
78M = 50, DD NO l /r/ 6" of fw,,4 oa% 4ree.
0/uN9 060"4
( R, 9, q 7, z)
Iv� o50,4
7o7 Ld lo9oon4 Vvlu��. =8� I (IVve,-'� 6''� ] SPi��W��%t.l1a�l
00N = 3
S1ape:
EJCCA VAT70t4
/'(3�OOAJ: 2�v x 60 x12, = µ S CApA,:)r y
8
! a 6 o x IX .. / y !,a
_7�� know: zyb x66 x 13. _ , j/0
x 64 x 13.5 = 17 51
7�fG/ �c1s3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
ROBERT L. JOHNSON
ROUTE 2 BOX 284
ROCKY MOUNT NC 27801
j� f
I J 1
252-446-5379 FU:
Existing Feeder to Finish swine
2750.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at-5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission..
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2750 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5225 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2750 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 6325 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job.• You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE Z: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
2012
13
NoA
FP
2.6
130
8.2
1066
I
SEP-APR
2012
14C
GOA
FP
3.2
I
1
1160 1
16.4 11024
SEP-APR
2012
14B
FP
3.2
IGOA
I
1
1160 1
14.6 1736
SEP-APR
2012
14A
FP
3.2
IGOA
I
1160 1
17.6 11216
SEP-APR
2012
15
NoA
BP
4.6
172.5
I
1
1 1
17.4 11276.5
APR-SEP
2012
-15
1
4
INOA
IWA
I
150
17. 1370
SEP-MAR
2012
6
BH
6.0
1MaA
I
1300 1
15.1 11530
APR-SEP
END
I
TOTAL17218.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
.50
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
37.5
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.),
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES I LBS AW N USED
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1 39.3
TABLE 2 0
TOTAL 39.3
*** BALANCE
7218.5
C
7218.5
-893.5
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1017.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5087.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 16.9583333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 40.7 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I I
I
jApplication RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
l Field l
I I
Soil Type
l Crop
!
l (in/hr) l (inches)
I I
2012
l 13 l
NoA
I FP
l l *1
2012
I I
l 14A l
GoA
I
I FP
I I
l I *1
2012 l
I I
14B I
GoA
I
l FP
I I
l l *1
2012
l I
114C l
GoA
1
l FP
I I
l l *1
I
2012 115
I
l
NoA
I
l BP
I !
l l *1
2012 l
I
6 l
MaA
I
l BH
k I
l l *1
!
2012 l
I
I
--15 I
I
NoA
I
i WA
I
I I
l i *1
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen.allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. I£ the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(see Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into.the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: ROBERT L. JOHNSON
(Please print)
Signature:
T
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Aff iliation:EDGECOBME SWCD
Address (Agency): P O BOX 10
Date:
(Please print)MARGARET KNIGHT
Phone No. 919-641-7900
TARBORO NC 27886-0010
�. Signature: Date: 4/4 10'
Page: 12

MEW
ej
_3- 3
NOT TO SCALE
Z ��L4
mww q
On*.
--V
W-2
4-T
4
7.3
Mnl
it
1.4
1.4
46
D9`-9
(64
I OV.
14.6