330008_PERMIT FILE_20171231

s -� - I '2—
V Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Reason for Visit: ZRoutine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: d [ ! Arrival Time: I (,�-��J Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: c2a CT ev) a- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: nC;q / ',^- J--A-4
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
r—
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Phone:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Noll -La er
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Region:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No 'NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: d
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
/
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
rr❑//No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
L
12. Crop Type(s): e�c
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
[] NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
WN ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections/,p Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Q Date of Inspection: teo tS/ t
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 <No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA [] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[Comments (refer. to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations; or`any other comments.
Use.drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additionalpages as necessary). 'x� ;`. w` �" •'f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

- /n
Type of Visit: AD Com ' nce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access If
Date of Visit: �Arrival Time: Departure Time: D �County: Region:
Farm Name: C-h� ox/Lr Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ii P dJ ✓' J A n
Certified Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Deslgn Current
Swine
CapacityWet
Poultry
C►apacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
R
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
W4Design
Current
D Cow
arrow to Feeder
O-p 5
Dr, P.ouli
R,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Jill I Soars
(
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
LlOther
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[—]Yes
No 0 NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o 0 NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

,Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: 7 ` I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structu e I
Identifier: /
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3
s do
- zr•
ZI <No❑ NA
❑ to ❑ NA
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
s
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rest, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes. ❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes <No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 <NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ��'r✓t A q , 4�y/tif - p� t 1 _ — .,
13. Soil Type(s): -
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
U 'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
2eNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E6No ❑ NA [:]NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did.the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [:]NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3& - 6 V I I Date of Ins ection: 7 - 91
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes "No"NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
[] Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface ti le drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other;
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
: ' /iid5e '57&rrVa-y 40-?r 4 d4e
`4-,I12Y C�A5b0"s
pec. 3 ( zvZO 0.1
13t9411- 12.¢-15 A., c4 (-7 vcr(-1
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes []No ❑NA []NE
❑Yes [:]No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [—]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�� IL
ii75 )q4q EnG�r�•, G `s
e (Va r �� ogse
5'St 0 LJ � 4l (L 2..n A J � �=-iJ►'� J'7t�9 n�
Reviewer/inspector Name:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: %g I " y 20 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rrJLc S� ll�/�
Page 3 of 3
Date: % % —
21412015

_,e—
(Type of Visit: 45 Co�outine
nspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: - 1 Arrival Time: 1 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: C4_j GV1 e t h CN— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: rf Title:
Onsite Representative: '1_ h
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude.
Region:
Design
Current Desig C* irrent
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Pap. Wet Ponitry Capacity Pop.
Cattle opacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
F La er
I jNon-LaXer I I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
j Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P,oultr, Ca acit Po
Layers
Non -Doi
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Boars
ullets
Beef Brood Cow
Rther
Leys
e PoultsOther
r
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ofthe State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214120.15 Continued

Factumber: 33 ]Date of Inspection: Z 7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
ructure 1 uc ure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier.` ' ) 2 C 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ZNo NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment
hrea notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
No A
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12, Crop Type(s): &qr A/ l3er � A
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement`?
❑ Yes�N�o
_❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[:3 Yes
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment`?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
jNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Faeili Number: - Q Date of inspection: ?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
N ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to, ,question #) Explain any_YES onswers and/or any additional recommendations or.any other comments. ,
Use drawings of facility to befter ex lain situations (use additional pages as necessary).`
I VIA, -}-a S 4 r4 f-+ f� °, A n E'er lj ` -6
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f 34- S' 1-t� Mye 1(
Phone:
Date: 7 = ld ! 7
21412015
Page 3 of 3

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
The Hanor Company, Inc.
CAJ One, Inc.
6717 NC 97 W
Battleboro, NC 27809
Dear The Hanor Company, Inc.:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
September 1, 2017 NC Dept of Environmental Quality
SEP - 6 2017
Raleigh Regional Office
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330008
CAJ One, Inc.
Animal Waste Management System
Edgecombe County
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on August
3, 2017. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for
two lagoons at the CAJ One, Inc. facility. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the
Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31, 2020 for Primary Lagoon
#2&#3.
The next sludge survey for the Primary lagoons #2 & #3 at this facility should be performed
before December 31, 2020.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File AWS330008
✓-�'Nothing Compares:: -.-
State of North Carolina I Environmentat Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

V_VA
A\,& A I
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Fz? r�� t 3) - e6-
c.fpd -4�41 GvU P
I If yC ARo
X SEA! 9r;
029424 --
'i��' •�G! tJE;G�y�'�
ER
RECEIVED 1 DENR ! DWQ
Aquifer Prntertinn Section
AUG 0 3 2009 �� 05) �
HANOR- NC CAJ ONE
Nutrient Management Plan
Completed in accordance with
USDA / NRCS guidelines and standards
and/or the
Soil and Water Conservation Commission
Standard of Practices.
Prepared for: THE HANOR COMPANY, Inc.
1151 Maple Swamp Road
Tarboro, NC 27886
[phone]
Prepared by: Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, NC 27606
[phone]

INDEX
Section 1
Nutrient Management 1 Waste Utilization Plan
Section 2
Maps
Section 3
Waste Analysis Reports
Section 4
Soil Samples
Section 5
Phosphorus Loss Assessment Reports
Section 6
Lagoon Design Information

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
07-23-2009
This plan has been prepared for:
HANOR-NC CAJ One, Inc.
Neal Jordan
1151 Maple Swamp Road
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-567-7385
This plan has been developed by:
Chris Mosley
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-859-0669
r
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
thiwbkn. n
alter
LL-s_ I 3 r o
Date
7/3 e O'9
Date
This plan meets the minimeim standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: �L- 7-7-7— 01?
Technical Specialist Signature Date
________________ ___________________ _ ____ _ _ _ __ _ _ __. _..__ _ _ _--___ ----
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Cover Page l

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 11
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 18,532,800 gals/year by a 4,800
animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
28599
Incorporated
49116
Injected
54089
Irrigated
31086
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
31,086
40566
-9,480
24,184,896
-5,652,096
Year 2
31,086
40566
-9,480
24,184,896
-5,652,096
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
" Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Pl
Removal
(lbslacre)
A
Applied
(lbs/acte)
2428
1
87.43
84.23
Low
11,0
Tarboro
Small Grain Overseed
1,0 Tons
15
NIA
Pearl Millett, Hay
3.5 Tons
47
NIA
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Pearl Millett, Hay
3.5 Tons
47
NIA
2428
2
26.73
18,85
Medium
8.0
State-CP
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
NIA
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bennudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
NIA
2428
3
29.02
19.84
Medium
NIA
State-CP
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.5 Tons
73
NIA
Small Grain Oversecd
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.5 Tons
73
NIA
2428
4
35.42
29.15
Medium
NIA
Altavista-CP
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
30
NIA
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
30
1 NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 178.60 152.07
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 7/27/2009
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

II
en
'k hln� h��I &aanceF:
,
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
<2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>-- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
soluble nutrient leaching below the
<= 10
root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management(590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Tenn No -Till (779), and edge -of field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
XAfIndqi:.
R­
tqlng- +1":
gl'i '�j Mcinakemehl'Recommendation
�J
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51-100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
Very High
Starter P application only
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 7127/2009
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(tbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
ppbed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manua:
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tong
2428
1
S1 l
Tarboro
87.43
84.23
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0.00
1,004.33
0.00
2428
1
Sl i
Tarboro
87-43
84.23
Pearl Millett, Hay
3.5 Tons
411-9/15
192
0
0
Irrig.
192
114.47
0.00
9,641.53
0.00
2428
1
S11
Tarboro
87.43
84.23
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
30
17.89
0.00
1,506.49
0.00
2428
2
S11
State-CP
26.73
18.85
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
brig.
20
11.92
0.00
224.76
0.00
2428
2
S11
State-CP
26.73
18.85
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
289
0
0
Irrig.
289
172.30
0.00
3,247.78
0.00
2428
2
S11
State-CP
26-73
18.95
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
30
17.89
0.00
337.14
0.00
2428
3
S 11
State-CP
29.02
19.84
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
1 50
0
0
brig.
20
11.92
0.00
236.56
0.00
2428
3
S 11
State-CP
29.02
19.84
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.5 Tons
411-9115
272
0
0
Irrig.
272
162.16
0.00
3,217.28
0.00
2428
3
S I 1
State-CP
29,02
19.84
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
1 30
17.89
0.00
354.85
0.00
2428
4
S11
Altavista-CP
35A2
29.15
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig,
63
37.56
0.00
1,094.86
0.00
2428
1 4
S l 1
Altavista-CP
35.42
29.15
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
1 4/1-9115
149
0
0
Img.
149
88.83
0.00
2,589.42
0.00
2428
4
S l 1
ltavista-CP
35.42
29.15
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
20
brig.
42
25.04
0.00
729.90
Q00
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 WUT Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
m
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
i Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(1bs1A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
(ibslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManumA
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Appled
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
24,184.90.,;_
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
18,532,80
Balance, 1000 gallons
-5,652.10,E-,a
Y
Total Applied, tons
'=
0.00
Total Produced, tons-?
0.00
Balance, tons
a�
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 WUT Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appliic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Read
Obs1A)
Cantu
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
Obs/A)
Apphc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
ppyed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
ga11A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
2428
1
S11
Tarboro
87.43
84.23
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
30
17.89
0.00
1,506.49
0.00
2428
1
S 1 l
Tarboro
87.43
84.23
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
lrrig.
20
11.92
0.00
1,OD4.33
0.00
2428
1
S11
Tarboro
87.43
84.23
Pearl Millett, Hay
3.5 Tons
4/1-9115
192
0
0
Irrig,
192
114.47
0.00
9,641.53
0.00
2428
2
Sl l
State-CP
26.73
18.85
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
1 Irrig.
30
IT89
0.00
337.14
0.00
2428
2
S11
rate-CP
26.73
18.95
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0-00
224.76
0.00
2428
2
S11
State-CP
26.73
18,85
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
311-9130
289
0
0
Irrig.
289
172.30
0,00
3,247.78
0.00
2428
3
S11
State-CP
29.02
19.M
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
1 30
17.89
0,00
354.85
0.00
2428
3
S11
State-CP
29.02
19.84
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0.00
236.56
0.00
2428
3
Sl l
State-CP
29.02
19.84
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.5 Tons
411-9115
272
0
0
Irrig.
272
162.16
0.00
3,217.28
0.00
2428
4
Sl l[Altavista-CP
35.42
29.15
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4130
125
0
20
hrig-
42
25.04
0.00
729.90
0.00
2428
4
S11
Altavista-CP
35.42
29.15
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14130
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
37.56
O.QD
1,094.86
0.00
2428
4
S 11Altavista-CP
35.42
29.15
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
149
0
0
Irrig.
149
88.83
0.00
2,589.42
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
24,184.90
Total Produced, I OW gallons
18,532.80
�_ 3:j, L--
Balance, 1000 gallons
-5,652.10
Total Applied, tons
`Y`=' -
Ox
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 WUT Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Bate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
2428
1
Tarboro
0.75
1.0
2428
2
State-CP
0.40
1.0
2428
3
State-CP
0.40
1.0
2428
4
Altavista-CP
0.50
1.0
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 7/27/2009 IAF Page I of
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Q
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbslA)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2428
2
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
18.85
10IE-3131
Supplied By:,@',
r�
,ftFt¢'j�l�
t''r�ii„'1
tr xi 'i'l3irl
rta
,114a'l�i�?r",
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
l
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2428
3
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
to
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
19.84
to/ 1-3n 1
Supplied By.
€€��
�iiki >i11t � ,
3 i iE".a
.`t'
if4"�`-;t3!€t
,i.
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
27
58
6
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2428
4
Req'd Nutrients
1251
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A
pp• Period
29.15
911-4130
SuppliedBo`I�`f€!i$@1'Clr%��;°�ipi1P1
y
1. . r. -
e s _dx. ,i
1!$.,1P1Ni.
r. '1.,.�@e a
i:1E}}jidg;rttl
(1. u.1,�� l d
;tFg'1EF€li
,.<f[(- 6. _,1f
�izlr,l9{,,�jr{,E,d�
,.
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
o
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Altavista-CP
Residual
20
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
04-01-08
Manurel
105
56
143
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE 1
0
56
143
13
]
2
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 NMR Page l of 4

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs1A)
Mg
(lbs1A)
Mn
(lbs1A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(1bs1A)
Lime
(tonslA)
Tract
Field
2428
1
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0{@7
Acres App.
Period
84.23
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
@@
f1t`tF€�{ gg f dj t
1, �M, P.
! 9 y
!i'lf d� �Plli§F#(I
� _.+� �+ .I
3 �i ¢6�� Eil
..!:<�.. €,!¢�,:.
¢
El9 SitPi li}' gg1
dW ,
pE € E#gip
li+ ? F
e=ti.a � l�
�I �
( J s jf0
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tarboro
Residual
0
D
D
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1,0Tons
04-01-08
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 Ibs/ac,
Low
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
D
Tract
Field
2428
1
Req'd Nutrients
' 192
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
84.23
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
�.;Hf 14
„a"},t ,11 .,-irk
i�k.�7
i
�2
t. it
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tarboro
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.5 Tons
04-01.08
Manure
192
103
262
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
47 Ibslac,
Low
BALANCE
0
103
262
23
1
4
1
0
Tract
Field
2428
2
Req'd Nutrients
501
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
Acres App.
Period
18,85
10/ 1-3/31
Supplied By:
;i€ i oaf3afdl}�
t i tlpl}?1 -i d
t31 P+>>:i
ti l i ir' 1.
ll itii=?i�! ig v i€
' ; I'. f rl.1'
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
D
0
01
0
0
Commerciat Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
l
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 Ibslac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
2428
2
Reg d Nutrients
289
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres APp
Period
t8.85
3/1-913D
Supplied By.
.E.
kk€t
'
3pt`
jt!€
tF•zltdi�3'�3`Pi
i€+g,UtlidlFto
r11 '.6,eifEi�i`r
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
6.5 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
289
154
395
35
1
6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
80 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
154
395
351
l
6
1
0
Tract
Field
2428
3
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
19.84
1011-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Datc
1.0 Tons
04-01-09
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE 1
D
27
58
6
0
1
0
0
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 NMR Page 2 of 4

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs1A)
K2O
(lbs1A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Limc
(tonslA)
Tract
Field
2428
3
Req'd Nutrients
272
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
19.84
1 4/1-9I15
Supplied By,
rFFE[
���lh'ii
51if.%
ka�
FRUN P1lt
rl �4 tt€
CROP
Pearl Miilett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
5.5 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
272
145
372
33
1
6
l
0
P Removal Rating
73 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
145
332
33
1
6
l
0
Tract
Field
2428
4
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
01
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
29.15
9114130
Supplied By:
. I c 3
# !�
-! j 1. R
Y ;'ck
ai
t N5 . :',.!
�r�.h�i,. �, �
, t
p0
1i,
il3
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Altavista-CP
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
04-01-08
Manure
105
56
143
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
56
143
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2428
4
Req'd Nutrients
149
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
29.15
4l1-9I15
Supplied By:
�� o
JJ
ie � � .
1� �` 5
r 7-;, n
I - } i":
'. a ;�P"'
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Altavista-CP
Residual
0
01
0
a
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
38 bu.
04-01-08
Manure
149
80
204
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
30 lbslac,
edium
BALANCE
0
80
204
18
l
31
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 NMR Page 3 ol' 4

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(ibs/A)
K2O
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs1A)
Mn
(lbs1A)
Zn
(1bs/A)
Cu
(lbs1A)
Lime
(lons/A)
Tract
Field
2428
1
Req'd Nutrients
* 192
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres APP'
Period
84.23
411-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tarboro
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.5 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
192
103
262
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
47 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
103
262
231
1
4
I
0
Tract
Field
2428
2
Req'd Nutrients
289
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IA
pp. Period
pP
18.85
31]-9/30
Supplied By:
pp J
ii4 t � ?4�
I 5j a�?
Ptd','W 44 0!
E' �� �3�
. 3 t - i f
�?t t`s� €
, f a_ 43. 3Siti .e
f,.a�=� " �
�� .X P
;y
(1@<. � > #.
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
6.5 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
289
154
395
35
1
6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
80 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
154
395
35
1
6
1
0
Tract
I Field
2428
3
Req'd Nutrients
272
0
40
01
0
01
0
0
Acres A
PP Period
19.84
411-9115
Supplied B
FP Y
' tr t' ` i
t,i%F �11t�
1 , 11` §
? CIl1# �1�,
i
� ,d_.ra ,1d$, l
i1sNz1,?rtt
,� a lrif�?L3 F
ia�!s.'51j _
a tfhi i,l!ea,117
(�*
il,, i�.4'r�:
CROP
Pearl Millets, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
State-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
5.5 Tons
04-01-08
Manure
272
145
372
33
1
6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
73 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
145
332
33
1
6
I
0
Tract
Field
2428
4
Req'd Nutrients
149
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
29.15
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
$-ii
,,
f `�
„1tll ninii.
axila
gdia: t.�l,=#ob'
r. -i ETP
FM t'
i*1' I,'
�,r,a,;,.3t 1,
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Altavista-CP
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
38 bu.
1 04-01-08
Manure
149
80
204
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
30 Ibs/ac.
Medium
I BALANCE 1
01
801
204
18
1
3
] 1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 NMR Page 4 of 4

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbslacre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil
sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
Reauired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Racom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
2428
1
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.8
0.0
31
None
465
None
2428
l
Small Grain Overseed
5.8
0.0
31
None
465
None
2428
1
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.8
0.0
31
None
465
None
2428
2
Small Grain Overseed
6.9
0.0
99
None
117
None
2428
2
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.9
0.0
99
None
117
None
2428
2
Small Grain Overseed
6.9
0.0
99
None
117
None
2428
2
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.9
0.0
99
None
l 17
None
2428
3
Small Grain Overseed
6.8
0.0
109
None
78
None
2428
3
Pearl Millett, Hay
6.8
0.0
109
None
78
None
2428
3
Small Grain Overseed
6.8
0.0
109
None
78
None
2428
3
Pearl Millett, Hay
6.8
0.0
109
None
7g
None
2428
4
Wheat, Grain
6.5
0.0
77
None
46
None
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.5
0.0
77
None
46
None
L
L14
Wheat, Grain
6.5
0.0
77
None
46
None
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.5
0.0
77
None
46
None
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 STV Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
171.41
342.81
1 514.22
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
85.70
171.41
1 257.11
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
160.69
321.39
482.08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Sludge Page I of I

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
t
86
1
2
89
1
3
78
1
4
126
1
5
151
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
to
180
I
11
150
1
12
119
2
1
88
2
2
91
2
3
80
2
4
128
2
5
153
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
180
2
11
150
2
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
_-_---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Well Drained to Excessively Drained
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced l' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Sulfur will be needed on
deep sands with high leaching, Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in
April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in
April and following the first and second hay cuts. For better soils the N rate can be increased to 300
lb/ac. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and
Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional
agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3
Small Grain: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this
time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Crop Note Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to feld(s): 1
Small Grain: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this
time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March. The total N needed is dependent on the soil type. Apply sulfur at the rate of 5 lbs/acre at
planting and another 20 Ibs/acre with the topdress N. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing
season to monitor the nutrient status of the oats, barley and rye. Timely management of diseases, insects
and weeds are essential for profitable oat, barley and rye production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
569493 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Pearl Millett: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Pearl Millett: No Comment
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-27-2009 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Manazement
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 Specification Page ]

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
569483 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/27/2009 Specification Page 4

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
P140NF. Nt TMR F.R S
DWQ s,i9-791-4239
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 911
SWCD 252-823-8187. Ext. 2; 919-791-4311
NRCS 252-823-8187— £xt. 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all
employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
December l8, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. Duringg normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office; 919-791-4239
Phone`31--791— . Aer hours, emergency number. 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number - 911
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department. Edgecombe County - 252-641-7573
d. Contact CES, phone number252-641 ' c SWCD office phone number _ 252— 7 —8187 swCn Ext .
local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - . 252-823-8187 NRCs Ext.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem
to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
2 December 18, 1996

5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name: Jerry Bullock, JP Bullock
b. Contractors Address: Battleboro, NC 27809
c. Contractors Phone: [phone]
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.
a. Name: AB Whitley
b. Phone: [phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify
the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of
the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public
body of water.
dRendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture.
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make
possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or
animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)
December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters
• Accumulation of Solids Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to
accumulated solids from gutters as designed;
/remove
M- Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge
Lagoons and Pits
_
• Crusted Solids Mr" —Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where pest
breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of
solids to a depth of no more than b - 8 inches over
more than 301/o of surface.
Excessive Vegetative
• Decaying vegetation 2`�Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons
Growth
and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of
decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Dry qvrtt-mq
Feeders
• Feed Spillage Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
decaying.vyastage.
9- Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter).
Feed Storage
• Accumulation of feed residues R SReduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
equate containment (e.g., covered bin for
rewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
13/ ORE*r and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page I

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal.
M- Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed.
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer, 15-30 day interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
❑ RAMA adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
O Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613
AM1C -November 11, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMWs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Swine Production tative or wooded buffers;
;'Zoe—mmended best management practices;
C3 Good judgement and common sense
Animal body surfaces • Dirty manure -covered animals Dry floors
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors 01-Siotted floors;
a term located over slotted floors;
FFee ers at high end of solid floors;
Or Scrape manure buildup from floors;
❑ Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; 9—T+requent manure removal by flush, pit recharge, or
• Partial microbial decomposition scrape;
© Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; Fe aintenance;
• Dust ; Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust 9- Washdown between groups of animals;
Feed additives;
a' Fed covers;
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
co vers
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid ❑ Flush tank covers;
while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill to near bottom of tanks with anti -siphon
vents
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits with
while pits are filling anti -siphon vents
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers
and drawdown
AMOC -November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Outside drain collection or •
Agitation during wastewater
O Box covers
junction boxes
conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon •
Agitation during wastewater
0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces •
Volatile gas emission;
M���&per lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
03' Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
0�' Minimum agitation when pumping:
O Mechanical aeration;
O Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles • High pressure agitation; [;--�Irrieate on dry days with little or no wind:
• Wind drift 13�Minimum recommended onemtine pressure:
9"'Plimn intake near lagoon liquid surface;
3' Pumn from second staee lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; O Bottom or midlevel loadine:
surface • Mixing while filling; © Tank covers:
• Agitation when emptying © Basin surface mats of solids:
© Proven hinlnvinal ndditives or oxidants
Settling basin surface • Partial microbial decomposition; O Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid level;
• Mixing while filling;
rl Remove settled solids regularly
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading; n mil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets • Volatile gas emissions Wash residual manure from spreader, after use;
rl Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry • Volatile gas emissions while drying rl Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
or sludge on field surfaces rl /Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
� Snread in thin uniform lavers for raoid divine:
n
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor
Site Specific Practices
Dead animal disposal pits
•
Carcass decomposition
rl Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
rl Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators
0
Incomplete combustion
rl Secondary stack bumers
Standing water around
•
Improper drainage;
9��Gradc and landscape such that water drains away
facilities
•
Microbial decomposition of
from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public
•
Poorly maintained access roads
Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information:
Swine Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-88
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
Environmental Assurance Program: NPPC Manual
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5
Available From:
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU -BAE
NCSU-BAE
NCSU-BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - Swine Extension
NC Pork Producers Assoc.
NCSU - Agri Communications
Florida Cooperative Extension

Form ERR-1
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
D.
.
_.Number
of

Form IRR-2
Tract #
Field size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Field #
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number F-
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (Il)
Date
(mm/dd/yr)
Irrigation
Waste Analysis
PAN 1
(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
(8) x (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance 2
(lb/acre)
(B) - (10)
Start Time
(hr:min)
End Time
(hr:min)
Total Minutes
(3) - (2)
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow rate
(gal/min)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(4) x (5) x (6)
Volume per Acre
(gal/acre)
(7)
(A)
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator Certification #
1 NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each application event.

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:
6y
Farm: Tract:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES.
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
Date:_ _/__I-
• To utilize agricultural wastes for
livestock feed or as an energy source.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT / WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes:
1 A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6. Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 1

and method of application and
incorporation, if applicable.
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable
information), that provides the following:
• General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
• Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
• Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
• Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
plan (see the following section, "BASIC
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT")
You are required to acquire and comply
with all federal, state, or local permit
requirements related to the handling and
application of manure or organic
materials.
The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement must exist to address all
organic waste not handled by the nutrient
management/waste utilization plan.
Manure or organic wastes will not be
applied to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment
system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding
during the period when flooding is
expected,
• frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified
by federal, state, or local laws or
regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
being applied within 75 feet of a
residential property boundary or
perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
in a manner not to reach surface waters,
wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available
land and/or third party manure agreements)
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
adherence to all nutrient application
requirements. All federal and state guidance
regarding the proper testing, handling,
planning, and application of sludge must be
followed for regulated operations.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
Management for questions.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
organic residues used for feedstock must be
handled in a manner to minimize
contamination and preserve its feed value.
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
If your facility is to be used for energy
production, all energy producing components
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization flan and
provisions for the utilization of residues of
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT
General
Application of nutrients must comply with all
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in
this plan are based on one or more of the
following:
• Default values approved by the N.C.
Interagency Nutrient Management
Committee that incorporate soil
productivity information, yield data,
and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Additional information on the default
values may be found at:
www. soil. ncsu. edu/nmpincnmwe/index. hfm
Documented actual yield data from
the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
consecutive specific crop harvests.
(For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
the last five years.)
A fertilization rate recommended by
North Carolina State University may
be used in cases where no yield data
or approved RYE values exist for a
crop.
• An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
chemical features may be used for
new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
ONLY be specified by a certified
Nutrient Management planner.
Erosion, runoff, and water management
controls have been planned, as needed,
on fields that receive nutrients.
Soil Testing
This nutrient management plan has been
developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
Soil samples must be collected and
prepared in accordance with North
Carolina State University or the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDA&CS website:
www.ncagr.comlagronomilobook.htm
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations. require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the
potential for phosphorus transport from
each field (or groups of similar fields)
have been conducted, using the North
Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT)
PLAT assesses the potential for
phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
site to surface water through each of the
four primary loss pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported
through erosion,
• soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P
transported through surface
runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
rating will identify whether nitrogen or
phosphorus shall be the rate -determining
element in developing the planned
application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating
I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
MEDIUM
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
HIGH
Manure application limited to
phosphorus removal from site
In harvested plant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with NCSU
guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
The application amount and rate (inlhr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented
on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
rating of High or Very High), manure
or other organic by-products shall be
applied at rates consistent with the
phosphorus application guidance
below. In such situations, an
additional nitrogen application from
non -organic sources may be required
to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production
are for pure grass stands. Due to the
nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
by 25% for the portion of the expected
yield that is removed through grazing.
Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
are used, the planned rates of
phosphorus application shall be based
on the PLAT rating for the site, as
follows:
Low or Medium Rating -- The
planned manure or organic by-
product application rate is based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
High Ratinq — The planned
manure or organic by-product
application rate is limited to the
phosphorus removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass.
Very High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations.
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
• When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
• not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating.
Potassium Application — Planned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient Imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
• Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
rates of application of other nutrients if
applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
NCDA&CS guidelines or
recommendations.
Nutrient Application Timing
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
to exceed five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
and copper concentrations shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites for
application shall be sought when these
metals approach excessive
concentrations. The following criteria and
actions are provided:
Mehllch-3Index
Action
[Zn.l l
300 (21 lbs/ac)
Peanuts are very sensitive to
zinc, and application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when possible.
The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
300. '
500 (35 Ibs/ac)
Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts.'
2,000 (142
Caution: Seek alternative sites
Ibs/ac)
when possible for all crops. *
3,000 (213
Critical toxic level for all crops.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 6

Mehllch-3lndex
Action
199:
2,000 (72 Ibslac)
Caution: Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops. `
3,000 (108
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac)
Cease application on all crops.'
• Maintain pH at 6.0 on these
sites.
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-B-93-002b
publication number at:
hyp.'#www. epa. aov/npdes/pubs/sludge. pdf
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streams/water
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
I.l
❑ NO
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
Index (LI) is not required.
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
is included in this plan.
While the results of the LI does not affect
your planned nutrient application rates,
some additional conservation practices
may be specified in the plan to reduce the
risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
soluble elements and either or both may
be components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
move with water as leachate down
through the soil, or over the soil surface
as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
phosphorus exist in different forms and
may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality.
As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
severe algal blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology,
and other factors in the state, the
environmental problems from excess
nutrients reaching surface water may not
be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico Basin,
the Chowan River, the watershed of the
B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
waters in North Carolina.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
water and eventually to surface waters.
(Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan
in some areas of the state with surface water
impairments. The L,I uses soils information
and local climate data to assess the potential
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results
of the LI analysis and recommended actions
are included in your nutrient management
plan, if applicable.
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
transported off -site than recognized in the
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
in soluble form leaching downward through
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
reached.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
You are responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. The following Operation &
Maintenance should be conducted:
1 Review the plan annually to determine if
adjustments or modifications to the plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217
interagency group guidelines
accepted by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality for .0200 operations
specify a plan revision when there are
changes in crops or cropping patterns
that utilize more than 25 percent of
the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
management plans shall be
thoroughly reviewed every five years
and revised if necessary. The next
review will be performed in
2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
product storage facilities from weather
and accidental leakage or spillage.
3. Ensure proper calibration of
application equipment to ensure
uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
and facilities used to implement the
Nutrient Management/Waste
Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
applicable, annually.
6. Records should be maintained for five
years, or for a period as required by
other Federal, state, or local
ordinances, or program or contract
requirements. To ensure adequate
information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
included:
• Soil test results and
recommendations for nutrient
application,
• Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
actual rates used exceed the
recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues .
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 9

AgFi W dl TS tCkW, fte
smDaowkasuft2H
woomcvm
F/"AM1N - r-Im sm
Soil
Caj One

The Hanor Company, Inc.
Caj One Facility
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Wetted Area
— — — — Effectively Irrigated Area
Caj One Application Fields
F-.0 %
I T.W Field
I Wekbd
I Ul tU-
Pivot 1
87.4
87.4
84.2
Pivot 2
26.7
19.6
18.9
Field 7
29.0
23.4
19.8
Field 8/9
35.4
32.3
29.2
Toto 1
178.5
163.2
152.1
x
Drina Rae
WWI M OOw
GWfUC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1000
Crn F—L)
f imh - 750 ft

Section 3
Waste Analysis Reports

MCDA&M a, .loads Eii den PYaie: 019033-2653 Web st1e: "w~4"AffW141.
Xtrit VM4"
sr.i •`
Waste Analysi
Gmeser
js TdM AMILM (Neal)
7101 NC 97 West
Ba111eboro, YG 278I19
A'
Vpo�
Edgambe County
Sample lnformttfas
Ubotvtwy 1lesWU (puts per mlllmm amtes3 othawtoe noted}
SAVre1&
8
P x Ca
Mg
8
Fe here So
cm
B Iva
Lt C
TWO
TOW 51.0
15.8 49.2 104
272
44-9
4.54 0.54 i.61
0.66
0-52
d1KN
wears Cale:
IYt3!
ALS
-M
Aw A4 Cd
Pb
N
SO Lt PH
m
CN Dn
an mz
g1.6
6.02
DU&Wfd--
:1"
Swi-kwmLk
Ow
Nuvicau Aral kNe For Aml Crop
MVIMJW&M
Qt}ler BlemeaU
1bt im affikm
App wNm MOW
N P205 w Ca AV 3 l4
MR
Zn c"
S biro G1
1Ya
m Cd Pb
a Se If
lrrisatloa
"1 0.21 Q39 a61 0.16 0.36 &03
T
0.01 1
1
O.TI
C+seapietd 7/15/2009
e pH Ul ilve agaan Could isbeiow the ideal r> for bfrtrriz! act[on arast< Reolarenl GradaaiifadW pH bf v9bg I fb. ola8 nAlunl Bmr per I000ru. R of OFM P-MAdng in Iltr lagoon SamFtE the
Yg2n mnn aW mmae to
Ausi pq nnul ii Ls wii m the drsired of 7.t?80.
Sample lnforrnaathm
ts6oratwy Remake (parts per milllom unless N bersrire nottdj
.Sa€eprtm
N
P 1C Ca
mg
S
A litre 2re
cu
B NO
£d C
GY1
red 180
32A 463 106
31S
sh1
179 a73 0.61
0.41
(.78
AV -IV
Felted Carr:
will
AM
1YO3
Aw 114 Cd
Pb
N
.Se ff PH
SS
CA. DNi%
ca% Alg
140
7.49
llrarr04eu:
Om
Swim ISM L4
lsim
riowe2bArailable for Aml crop
yviomiguaw
Oder elements
Jb)1OOOjwtkw
4OW&RA601hod
1Y m M Ca mg S &
Afa
Zn Ca
B No G1
xYa
jw C8 Pb
Al Se Lf
Ire pd-
U.75 0.43 3.7 0.62 0.18 0.15 cm
T
1 T
T
12
m
N
m
N
CD
LD

?icii iC3 gamic Ditislnn
Phome: [phone] wcb aitr. mm.a
Gam: Jardar, AnAMY Wed)1teperL W00499 PW2
Sampie Lformsem
tahmatary'Resuke (pau per =Mka a.iasa alhrr Mw soero
SappkAX
GJ4
WsMCNIr
'U
J7bm tla
S�fnCI ti
N
P K Cs
S Fe Mrs 8n
Cu 9 NO L7 C
TWaI 148
ff,L,v
-,1 W
AV3
OIkN
UM
33.5 399 171 33$ 25.0 3.66 0.21 0.79
a4t Ob7
Iva Nf Cd A At so R PR
iS C3V in" cam ALENPID
7-15
f
lialaiegtaA+adWc for Fitt Crw
MwMMwMOther
Rkmeots "1000
Apy$uaircnJfefW
irr*kn
N w w fa M9 S A Ma
Il62 0.45 3L2 "1 0.20 0.15 OA2 T
Tie Cb E A& CI
OLOI T T
Na M W A4 At Se Is
1.0
North Carolina
tobacco trust Fund Commission
Rapmgramming of the laboratory-informition-management system that reakea this report possible Is being funded
through w giant from the Borth Carollns Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
na► kyoufor using agranoirJe servirer to montage nufdEnts andaafeguard envlro—MIaf qu ffly
- Steve Trader, Camn-Assiauer of AgricYafture
m
N
w
N
m
LO
8

�` 0»�=1�vlsioiil•�:,p6oae ?I: __ - rr: II - - _ _� ;;._ - - ---_ _ _ _ :-,R_:
l ��+ Jordan, Anthony (Neal) a es To.
7101 ITC 97 West
Batllebom, NC 27809
Soil Tat Repwt Fmw 309
12131A008 SERVING V.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 6O YEARS Edgecombe County
CorI1 ilb
B -- 4, 3, $,12
-
sample Na Ud OV
Ala Yr 1'IA
Crop or Year
Lime
hOs K20
&4
S
Ca
Zu
B
Mm
See Note
S11HOU
1st Crop: Laws
50M (I.O lbs Nitrogen or EQUIV PER 1000 SQ FT)
0
.0
4
2nd Crap:
0
.0
Test ResWts
Safi Class ILN% W/V
GEC BS%
Ac pH RI 1C 1
Ca% Mg%
111n-I Nrr-A1(I)Mn-Al(2) Zn.1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
NO,t-N AI4.1N Na
WIN 0.46 1.09
8.5 69.0
2.6 5.6 85 90
47.0 1&0
445 300
300
59
35
0.1
.._
. _ ......_
.
_
Sgni le No. Last Cro
p
Ma Yr 2'lt
ar Year
&*
Time
P205 K20
,ilg
S
Cn
Zn
B
Mn
See,Yote
SBGAR
1st Crop: G vIe:n,Veg
85M (1 A lbs Mitrogert cr EQUN PER 1000 SQ F)
0
.0
4
2nd Crop:
0
.0
Test Results
Soil Oats lm% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 1C 1
Ca% Mg%
M*1 A1n-AI(1)Xu-AI(2) Zn-1
ZwAf
Cv-I
,S•I
SS-1
NON Aff+-N Na
�NIV I 27
O.2 7
6.7 A
69
2.1 5.8 5 121
39
2.0 .0
5 9
1
2 0 46 S
465
3 1
27
0. 1
Sn&NO Last Crop
Me Yr TIA
Crap or Year
Lime
P205 KJO
Afg
S
Cry
Zn
B
Din
See Note
l
4 2008 1.0
ist Crop: Soybeans
0
0 0 0
$
0
0
0
pH$
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
W100 0 0
$
0
0
0
.0
pH$
3
Test Results
Sail Grass Sn% W/V
CEC Bd%
Ac pH P-I 1
CaX ft%
Nn 1 Mx- 1(2)MR A1(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
No3-N NN4-N Na
MIN 0.51 U2
6.4 84A
1.0 6.9 398 234
60.0 7.0
124 71 71 106
106
100
45
0.3
�ltorma _
1� ��itric
Se
S le No. Last Crop
Mu Yr 77A
Crop or Year
time
N P2os 1I;20
mg
S
Cu
Zre
B
Mn
See Mole
C.iJ 2
4 2008 1.0
Ist C T: SudlSorg Pas
0
140-180 0 0
0
0
0
0
.0
p1I$
12
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 0 0
0
0
0
0
Test Results
N
N
W
haw
COCaw
.0 A 3 n
Soil Class Heil% W/V CIM BS% Ac pH M X--1 C4% Mg% MW Mn-AC(1)Nadl(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S I SS-1 NOJ-,Y jVH+N Na w
MIN 0.56 1.29 6.4 84.0 1.0 6.9 418 259 56.0 8,0 196 121 114 117 117 99 45 0.3

.......,..w .4lamid 7111b3U1�
R#ld lafo
_ ' : rlfune. tsiyrt -ab == :-:web it_e: ivs .nc�gR:em1ag
Appfl Lime ' Re�ol�iiicla#O>as77
atioin _ G o eF )ordau, Anttiony
-8epo t Ha:-1979Z
S e Na fast Crop
MO Yr TIA
Crop or Year
I rose
P105
K20
dig S
Ca
Zn
B
111n
See Note
4 2008 IA
1st Crop: svd&q Pas
0
140-180 0
S 0
0
0
.0
pH$
12
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 0
0-20
>t 0
0
0
.0
pH$
3 m
Test Rafts
n
sail Qstss Hdi% WIV
CEC M%
Ac pH P-1 KI
Ca b Mg%
AM-1 Xb-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) 1as I
Zn-AI
Ca -I
S-1
SS-7
NO3-N NH4-N Na
,ill 0.46 1.34
5.3 81.0
I.0 6.8 184 79
68.0 6.0
114 73
66 78
78
109
32
0.1 CD
»a r -
_
L e
Epp . �I
: Re' me atio `
rl
: N
Saar �i'a. Last Cmp
No Yr TIA
Crop or Year
'Unre
8 P10s
JfiiC1
Mg S
Cat
Zn
B
Mm
,see Note
4
4 2008 1.0
1st Crop: soybeans
0
0 0
0
$ 0
0
0
pH$
3
2nd Crap. small Grains
0
80-100 0
0
# 0
0
0
.0
phi$
3
Test Results
m
Sod Class On WIV C86 M Ac pH P-I 1C I
AHN 0,66 1.16 6.2 no 0.9 6.5 69 123
Sanepis MO. Last Crop Me Yr TIA Crop or Year
TW 01 ist Cmp: FeVOGIMOI
2nd QW- Small Grains
Test Resuhs
jw Class MN WN
1mN o.66 1.18
CBC BA Ac PH P-I "
5.7 8s.0 o.7 6.6 I03 38
Ca%
ft%
Mx -I Attr AI(1)Mtj-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-AI
CO-1
69.0
72
43 28 28
46
46
77
S-I SS -I NO3-N AM-N Ns
42 0.2
Line
N
SOS
K20
Mg
S
Ca
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
0
120-200
0
50-70
0
0
0
0
-0
pH$
12
0
80-I00
0
50-70
0
0
0
0
.0
p11$
3
Cq% Alg% Mn•I Mgt-AI(1)din-AI(2) Awl Tat -AI Cfit-I S-1 &V-1 m3-N wff#.m Na m
60-0 AD 44 34 27 64 64 102 31 0.1 z0
Sample Biro. Last Criop No Yr TIA Crap or Year hates P10s K20 At S cm 7as B Mar See Note
TW02 1st Crop; Berm Hay/PasfM 0 IW22D 0 90-110 0 0 0 0 pl1$ 12 £
2rtd Crap. Small Grains 0 80-100 0 30-50 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil CUSS J i9b W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% blg% flirt -I Nn-AI(1)Mx-AI(2) Zn-I Zrr-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
AUX 0.51 1.12
6.2 90.0
0.6 6.8 174 54
63.0 24.0 63 43 36 221 221 231 38 0.2
Fie{d :•.._
..: - . hkfiW
��It
Reta�rtre -
z _
S4mPle No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime ' P2fls K20 mg S Cst Zn B Mat See Note
S&Ls
1st Cmp: Deer/Tarkey
0 "0 110-130 30-50 0 0 0 0 pH$
2nd Crap:
0
Test Results
Soil CUM HMN W!Y CEC BS% Ac PH P-I K-1 C4% Mgt Mr-t Mn-AI(I)MS-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cry -I S-I SS-1 NO3-N M#-N Na 3>
911K 0.60 0.92 11.6 92.0 0.9 6.7 13 48 59.0 32.0 1221 739 65 65 81 41 0.2 FR
m
A

NCANAT Version: 1.85
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 12/4/2006 3:57:44 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil LOSS:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV Factor ,(DATABASE)
Soil Test 28" - 32
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P = 5
LEACHATE P = 11
SOURCE P - 3
TOTAL P RATING = 21 (LOW)
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
HANOR-CAJ-1
2428
P--1 Q
TaB: Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season - Manured) : Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.47 ac in
Lb P205: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2.0 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
131.3
1.4
36.3
1.4
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.85
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 12/4/2006 4:06:57 PM
INPUTS
calendar Year:
2006
County:
Edgecombe
Producer Identifier:
HANOR-CAJ-1
Tract Number:
Field Number:
2428
P-2 Q
Soil Series:
StB: State loamy sand,
0 to 4 percent slopes
Crop:
Soybeans (Full Season -
Manured) : Conventional Tillage
Fertilizers:
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P205:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
2.0 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
Soil Test 0" - 8"
294
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.3
Soil Test 28" - 32"
29
WV (DATABASE)
1.3
—Factor
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P - 5
SOLUBLE P = 18
LEACHATE P - 8
SOURCE P 18
TOTAL P RATING = 49 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.85
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 12/4/2006 3:37:04 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV -Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P - 6
LEACHATE P - 0
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
HANOR-CAJ-1
2 4M ,7 3
StB: State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season - Manured) : Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P2O5: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2.0 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
103
1.3
GOOD
OUTPUTS
SOURCE P = 18
TOTAL P RATING = 26 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.85
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 12/4/2006 4:02:17 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 3
SOLUBLE P = 11
LEACHATE P - 0
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
HANOR-CAS-1
676
.8. l &
AaA: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season - Manured) : Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.17 ac in
Lb P205: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2.0 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
116
1.3
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS
SOURCE P = 30
TOTAL P RATING = 44 (MEDIUM)

File: 14ANOR NCICAJ One NMPILAGVOL.XLS
Date: 7/29/09
Lagoon Volume Computation
CAJ One Lagoon 1 Secondary For Lagoon 2 - As Designed
Designed Lagoon Cell
Liquid Level Parameters
Sideslope, HN
2:0
Liq. Level Depth, ft
71
Liq. Level Width, ft
e
51
Liq. Level Length,ft
°.300:1
Liq. Level Volume, ft3
923,379.3
LL Surface Area, ft2
142,500.0
Liq. Level Volume, gal
6,906,877
Loading Rate Parameters
VS inflow, lb/dayj 0'.0
Load Rate, lb/ft3-day 0.0000
Load Rate, kg/m3-day 0.0000
Top of Berm Parameters
Freeboard, ft
MEMO
Top Berm width, ft
479.00
Top Berm length, ft
304.00
Slope Length, ft
17.89
Total Depth, ft
8.00
Top Berm Volume, ft3
1,067,434.7
Top Berm Volume, gal
7,984,411
Bottom of Lagoon Parameters
Bottom Width, ft
447.0
Bottom Length,ft
272.0
Liner Parameters
Sideslope area(W), ft2
16,564.79
Sideslope Area(L), ft2
10,303.80
Bottom Area, ft2
121,584.00
Total Inside Area, ft2
148,452.59
Liner Thickness, ft ' "'' 9 "' 09` ., (1M. 00
Liner Mtl. Vol., yd3 0
Samples Per Vol, yd3 1500
# Samples req'd. 0.00

File: HANOR_NCICAJ One NMPILACVOL.XLS
Date: 7/29/09
Lagoon Volume Computation
CAJ One Lagoon 2 Primary - As Designed
Designed Lagoon Cell
Liquid Level Parameters
Sideslope, HN
Liq. Level Depth, ft
Liq. Level Width, ft
ITO
245:f
Liq, Level Length,ft
6!
Liq. Level Volume, ft3
1,456,403.7
LL Surface Area, ft2
150,675.0
Liq. Level Volume, gal
10,893,899
Loading Rate Parameters
VS inflow, lb/day MYE_ ` $ f} ,
Load Rate, Ib/ft3-day 0.0000
Load Rate, kg/m3-day 0.0000
Top of Berm Parameters
Freeboard, ft
E� ' S Mi�. � 1
Top Berm width, ft
249.00
Top Berm length, ft
619.00
Slope Length, ft
26.83
Total Depth, ft
12.00
Top Berm Volume, ft3
1,609,804.0
Top Berm Volume, gal
12,033,854
Bottom of Lagoon Parameters
Bottom Width, ft
201.0
Bottom Length,ft
571.0
Liner Parameters
Sideslope area(W), ft2
12,074,77
Sideslope Area(L), ft2
31,931.05
Bottom Area, ft2
114,771.00
Total Inside Area, ft2
158,776.82
Liner Thickness, ft
..�
i . ;i O�
Liner Mtl. Vol., yd3
0
Samples Per Vol, yd3
1500
# Samples req'd.
0.00

File: HANOR_NCICAJ One NMMAG VOL.XLS
Date: 7/29/09
Lagoon Volume Computation
CAJ One Lagoon 3 Primary - As Designed
Designed Lagoon Cell
Liquid Level Parameters
Sideslope, HN
Liq. Level Depth, ftLiq.
Level Width, ft
WROV1111
Liq. Level Length,ft
Liq. Level Volume, ft3
2,025,333.3
LL Surface Area, ft2
225,000.0
Liq. Level Volume, gal
15,149,493
Loading Rate Parameters
VS inflow, lb/day&
Load Rate, lb/ft3-day 0.0000
Load Rate, kg/m3-day 0.0000
Top of Berm Parameters
Freeboard, ft
f UM _? �l',0
Top Berm width, ft
254.00
Top Bern length, ft
904.00
Slope Length, ft
24.60
Total Depth, ft
11.00
Top Berm Volume, 0
2,252,638.7
Top Berm Volume, gal
16,849,737
Bottom of Lagoon Parameters
Bottom Width, ft
210.0
Bottom Length,ft
860.0
Liner Parameters
Sideslope area(W), ft2
11,412.89
Sideslope Area(L), ft2
43,388.66
Bottom Area, ft2
180,600.00
Total Inside Area, ft2
235,401.55
Liner Thickness, ft 000
Liner Mtl. Vol., yd3 0
Samples Per Vol, yd3 1500
# Samples req'd. 0.00

File: HANOR NCICAJ One NMPILAGVOL.XLS
Date: 7/29/09
Lagoon Volume Computation
CAJ One Lagoon - Secondary for Lagoon 3 - As Designed
Designed Lagoon Cell
Liquid Level Parameters
Sideslope, HN
Li Level De th, ftq, p
MEV4
Liq. Level Width, ft
Liq. Level Length,ft
Liq. Level Volume, 113
1,094,393.8
LL Surface Area, ft2
212,500.0
Liq, Level Volume, gal
8,186,066
Loading Rate Parameters
VS inflow, lb/day
Load Rate, lb/ft3-day 0.0000
Load Rate, kg/m3-day 0.0000
Top of Berm Parameters
Freeboard, ft
E I ffm NilIMMl�0
Top Berm width, ft
504.00
Top Berm length, ft
429.00
Slope Length, ft
14.31
Total Depth, ft
6.40
Top Berm Volume, ft3
1,308,749.1
Top Berm Volume, gal
9,789,444
Bottom of Lagoon Parameters
Bottom Width, ft
478.4
Bottom Length,ft
403.4
Liner Parameters
Sideslope area(W), ft2 14,058.96
Sideslope Area(L), ft2 11,912.34
Bottom Area, ft2 192,986.56
Total Inside Area, ft2 218,957.86
Liner Thickness, ft !'ml k 910%ko
Liner Md. Vol., yd3 0
Samples Per Vol, yd3 1500
# Samples req'd. 0.00

y
THIS DESIGN IS FOR A TWO -STAGE LAGOON . }
J
CLIENTS NAME
COUNTY==-------__:..-
TODAYS DATE
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE =>
NUMBER OF PIGS WEAKLING TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH —_—__>
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WEAKLING ----_-_>
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER~--ww=>
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
DEGREE OF ODOR CONTROL
(minimum 1.0 cu. ft. per lb sslw)
(maximum 3.0 cu. ft. per lb sslw)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL-_>
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION__ ---=
Depth of Permanent Water 11.0
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
FIRST STAGE SIDESLOPES
FIRST STAGE FREEBOARD - ---- --_ --___>
Permanent Volume Required 1454880.0
Permanent Volume Provided 1456403.7
First Stage Top of Dam Elevation = 52.0
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length 619.0 feet Width = 249.0
411,5 2q4
237
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET>
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE - ->
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY ====>
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL ---_>
LENGTH AT TOP OF ALL TEMPORARY STORAGE >
WIDTH AT TOP OF ALL TEMPORARY STORAGE =>
TEMPORARY STORAGE LIQUID SURFACE ELEV. >
SECOND STAGE BOTTOM ELEVATION - ---===>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION >
Depth of Temporary Storage
SECOND STAGE SIDESLOPES
SECOND STAGE FREEBOARD
Temporary Storage Required 915358.2
Temporary Storage Provided 92337.9.3
Berry Anderson
Edgecombe
November 3,1993
1200 FEET
0
0
2400
0
0
1.0
5.0 YEARS
615.0
FEET
245.0
FEET
51.0
FEET
40.0
FEET
f.
2.0:1
1.0
FEET
cubic feet
cubic feet
feet
feet
0 SQUARE FEET
180 DAYS
1.0000 GALLONS
10.3 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
300.0 FEET
479.0 FEET
$1.0 FEET
44.0 FEET
44.0 FEET
feet
2.0:1
1.0 FEET
cubic feet
cubic feet .
Second stage Top of Dam Elevation = 52.0 feet �k
;Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 304.0 feet Width - 479.0 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation is 50.1.5212050275 feet
TO 39vd HSVMA0n8i NONVH
E00LEZ8Z9Z 90.TT 900Z/LZ/0T

1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 head weanling-to-feeder x 30 lbs.
0 head feeder--to-finish x 135 lbs. _
2400 sows farrow-to-weanling x 433 lbs. _
0 sows farrow -to -feeder x 522 lbs. _
0 sows farrow--to-finish x 1417 lbs --
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) =
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
� ll
0 lbs.
0 lbs.
1039200 lbs.
0 lbs.
0 lbs.
1039200 lbs.
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 5.0
Sludge volume = 415680.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume - 1454880.0 cubic feet
NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal. lagoon liquid level at elevation 51.0 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 40.0 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formulz
SS/ENDI SS/END2
2.0 2.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH -
615.0 245.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
$71.0 201.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm)
593.0 223.0
SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.0 2.0 11.0
150675.0 (AREA, OF TOP)
114771.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
132239.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
150675.0 528956.0 114771.0 1.833
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL=-1456403.7 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED w 1454880.0 CU. FT.
THE INSIDE EDGE DIMENSIONS OF THE FIRST STAGE AT THE
TOP OF DIKE ELEVATION ARE;
ARE 619.0 FEET BY 249.0 FEET
Z0 39Vd HSVmAonal a0NVH £00L£Z8Z9Z 90:TZ 900Z/1Z/GT

1
5. DYKE
r+~ place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
first stage lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
619.0 249.0 154131 square feet
G"j
52.0 feet.
second stage lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
304.0 479.0 145616 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 ,square feet
TOTAL DA 299747 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 1039200 SSLW * 0.0104 gallon/lb. SSLW/day *180 days
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
r Volume - 250074.9 cubic feet
6B. volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems
that recycle the lagoon water are accounted for in 6A.
Volume - 10000 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 240641.7 cubic feet
6c. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Volume = 10.3 in * DA / 1.2 inches per foot
Volume = 257282.8 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
volume = 6.7 inches / 12 inches per foot DA
Volume = 167358.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 250074.9 cubic feet
6B. 240641.7 cubic feet
6C. 257282.8 cubic feet
6D. 167358.7 cubic feet
FA gnvA HRVMNNW 1 NnNVH F:AAI. RZ8Zg7 9A : t t 920Z /LZ /0 i

r
.A 4, ii+M
7. SECOND STAGE DESIGN
r
Cj4J
SS/END1 SS/END2
SS/SIDEI SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 7.0
AREA OF TOP (BELOW FREEBOARD)
LENGTH *WIDTH =
300.0 475.0
142500.0 (AREA OF TOP) y
jy
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb
272.0 447.0
121584.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm)
286.0 461.0
131846.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = (AREA TOP +
(4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] *
DEPTH/6
142500.0
527384.0 121584.0
1.167
VOLUME OF SECOND STAGE
BELOW FREEBOARD = 923379.3
CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED =
915358.2
CU. FT.
THE SECOND STAGE FREEBOARD IS = 1.0 FEET
THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE
SECOND STAGE AT ELEVATION 52.0
FEET
ARE 304.0 FEET LONG BY 479.0 FEET WIDE
S. BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A.
250074.9 cubic feet
6B.
240641.7 cubic feet
6C.
257282.8 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME
747999.4 cubic feet
DEPTH OF WASTE = TOTAL
PUMPED VOLUME / SURFACE AREA AT
BOTTOME OF SECOND STAGE
DEPTH = 747999.4
CU. FT. J 121584.0 SQ. FT
DEPTH = 6.2 FEET
DESIGNED BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
1713 n9va
HSHMNnnN l NnNVH
FAQY F7.R7.G7. qP : T T gAA7. // 7. /QT.

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A TWO -STAGE LAGOON
�Aj
CLIENTS NAME
COUNTY
TODAYS DATE
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE _>
NUMBER OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH --->
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WEAKLING
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
DEGREE OF ODOR CONTROL
(minimum 1.0 cu. ft. per lb sslw)
(maximum 3.0 cu. ft. per lb sslw)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION -_-_------__-__>
Depth of Permanent Water 10.0
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
FIRST STAGE SIDESLOPES---r-•-----__----->
FIRST STAGE FREEBOARD
Permanent Volume Required 1993320.0
Permanent Volume Provided 2025333.3
Berry Anderson
Edgecombe
November 3,1993
1600 FEET
5700
0
0
2400
0
1.0
5.0 YEARS
900.0 FEET
250.0 FEET
51.0 FEET
41.0 FEET
2.0:1
1. 0 FEET
cubic feet
cubic feet
First Stage Top of Dam Elevation = 52.0,feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 904.0 feet Width = 254.0 feet
0
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET> 0 SQUARE FEET
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE180 DAYS
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY ====> 0 GALLONS
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =====> 13.4 INCHES
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =====_> 6.7 INCHES
LENGTH AT TOP OF ALL TEMPORARY STORAGE > 425.0 FEET
WIDTH AT TOP OF ALL TEMPORARY STORAGE => 500.0 FEET
TEMPORARY STORAGE LIQUID SURFACE ELEV. > 51.0 FEET
SECOND STAGE BOTTOM ELEVATION =__= _= _> 45.6 FEET 6646m -rb.
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__> 45.6 FEET Brea va*Wvet, ekV 4
Depth of Temporary Storage 5.t feet ' � ;` A2 o6A1in -AW
SECOND STAGE SIDESLOPES -- _--_=_=______ 2.0 :1
SECOND STAGE FREEBOARD --__-- ----> 1.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Required 1089394.3 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Provided 1094393.8 cubic feet
Second Stage Top of Dam Elevation = 52.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 429.0 feet Width = 504.0 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation is - 956e..9!@9_ feet
.�;g
90 39Vd HSbM>0r1U 6ONVH E00tEZ8Z9Z 90:TT 900Z/tZ/0T

. ... .... .. .fly. yti.......
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
5700 head weanling-to-feeder x 30 lbs. -
0 head feeder -to -finish x 135 lbs. _
0 sows farrow-to-weanling x 433 lbs. _
2400 sons farrow -to -feeder x 522 lbs. _
0 sows farrow -to -finish x 1417 lbs =
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) _
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
NJ
171000 lbs.
0 lbs.
0 lbs.
1252800 lbs.
0 lbs.
1423800 lbs.
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 5.0
Sludge Volume = 569520.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total. Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 1993320.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 51.0 Feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 41.0 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formulz
SS/EN01 SS/END2
2.0 2.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
900.0 250.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb -
860.0 210.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
SS/SIDE1 SS/SiDE2 DEPTH
2.0 2.0 10.0
225000.0 (AREA OF TOP)
180600.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
(Lm * Wm )
880.0 230.0 202400.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
225000.0 809600.0 180600.0 1.667
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 2025333.3 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 1993320.0 CU. FT.
THE INSIDE EDGE DIMENSIONS OF THE FIRST STAGE AT THE
TOP OF DIKE ELEVATION ARE;,
ARE 904.0 FEET BY 254.0 FEET
90 39vd HSVM>Dn?J1. 8ONdH E08LEZ8ZSZ 90=TT 90OZ/LL/0T

,-� 5 . DIKE CA
I
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation 52.0 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
first stage lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
904.0 254.0 229616 square feet
second stage lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
429.0 504.0 216216 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 445832 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 1423800 SSLW * 0.0104 gallon/lb. SSLW/day *180 days
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 342625.7 cubic feet
6B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems
that recycle the lagoon water are accounted for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Volume = 13.4 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 497845.7 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 248922.9 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 342625.7 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 497845.7 cubic feet
6D. 248922.9 cubic feet
LO 39dd HSVM>WHi NONVH £0ALEZ9Z9Z 90:it 900Z/LZ/0T

7. SECOND STAGE DESIGN
SS/END1 SS/END2
2.0 2.0
CAJ-1
SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.0 2.0 5.4
AREA OF TOP (BELOW FREEBOARD)
LENGTH * WIDTH
425.0 500.0 212500.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb --
403.4 478.4 192986.6 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) =
414.2 489.2 202626.6 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
212500.0 810506.6 192986.6 0.900
VOLUME OF SECOND STAGE BELOW FREEBOARD = 1094393.8 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 1089394.3 CU. FT.
THE SECOND STAGE FREEBOARD IS = 1.0 FEET
THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE SECOND STAGE AT ELEVATION 52.0 FEET
ARE 429.0 FEET LONG BY 504.0 FEET WIDE
8. BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
GA.
342625.7
cubic
feet
6B.
0.0
cubic
feet
6C.
497845.7
cubic
feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME
840471.4
cubic
feet
DEPTH OF WASTE = TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME / SURFACE AREA AT
BOTTOME OF SECOND STAGE
DEPTH = 840471.4 CU. FT. / 192986.6 SQ. FT
DEPTH = 4.4 FEET
DESIGNED BY: [.[ . APPROVED BY:
DATE: -3�Y/� 14 DATE:
80 39Vd HS17MA3fldl 8ONVH E00LEZ8ZSZ 90:TT 900Z/LZ/0T

33-S
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
CAJI Phase II
Berry Jr. Anderson
Route 2 Box 215-C
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-823-4668
07-08-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Margaret Knight
Edgecombe SWCD
,
201 St. Andrew Street
P 0 Box 10
Tarboro, NC 27886
252- 41-7900
�?
D clop ignature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
plan.
t & r J(- 7 —� a -- o 3
Si (owner) P W P4— Date
f4� 7 0
Signature (manager i
producer) Dam
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: — -7 /1 CA3
T 'cal cialist S ate
............... ........ ................ ....................... - ................... ........... . ... ,..
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed, 07-08-2003 Cover Page l
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
10AR 3 0 2009

t
Nutrients applied In accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
sit
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 18,532,800 gals/year
by a 4,800 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of a oximatel 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
28599
Incorporated
49116
Injected
54089
Irrigated
31086
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
33,021.00
19,684,682
-1,151,882
Year 2
37,653.50
22,446,560
-3,913,760
Year 3
33,108.90
19/737/086
-1,204486
.........................................................................
Nola. Zn sourca W, S means standard sourca, U means user detlned source.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 07-08-3003 Source Page 1 of 1

The We shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for cash field. Realistic
Yield rsdmates are also provided for each crop in the plan. in addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Pield
Leaching
Index (l,l)
Sail Series
Cr Se ueme
RYE
2428
Of
MIAAltavista-CP
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu,
Cotton
850;bt.
w hcat, Grain
60 by.
Soybeans, Manured, Pull Season
4
Wheat, Gain
60
2428
D2
N/A
Conewe
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
Canon
(IO lbs.
Wheat, Grain
Soybeans, Mmumd, Full Scum
30 by.
Wheat, Grain
40 by
2428
D3
MA
stkwcp
cam, Gerais
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bg.
Cotton
875 lbs.
Wheat* Grain
§9 bu.
Soybeans. Manned, Full Season
45 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu,
676
Bl
NIA
Akavism-CP
Con, Grain
130 bu.
What, Grans
Loam
850
Wheat, Grain
60 .
Soybeans., Manured, Full Seaton
45 bu-1
What, Grain
60 bu.
676
B21
MA
AltavisWCP
Can, Grain
l30 bu.
Wbat, Grain
60 bg-
CORM
g
Wheat. Grain
60 bu.
676
83
NIA
Altwista-CP
Can, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat. Gain
60 bu.
676
1,C2,C3
MA
State-CP
Soybeans, MaMured, Full Season
45 bu.
Wheat, Grail!
676
1t1A
MA
Tarboro
Soybeans, Manumd, Full Season
25 bu.
Wheat. Gaits
35 bu.
Hybrid Ba nvdagrass Hay
4.0 Tons
small Grain oversew
1.0
67
RI8
WA
Soybeans, Maned, Full Season
tl
38644 i7atabaso Version 2.0 Data Printed: (17-48.2UO3 PCS Psgo t of
NOTE., Symbol * moans user entmd data,

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (L)
Soil 5erie`
Croo Semmue
RYE
wheat, drain
Hybrid Bermudagass Hay
Small Grain Qverseed
676
RIC
N/A
Roanoke
Soybeans, Manured, Fun Season
.1LIM
44 bu
Wheat, Crain
Hybrid Sermu&zrass Hay
3.5 Tons
Small Grain Ovcrseod
.0
6761
R6A
NIA
C,,w
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
30 bu,
Wheat, Grain
Hybrid BermudaVasa Hay
5.5 TOM
Small Grain overseed
1.0 Ton
676
R611
N/A
st a cp
soya, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
Wheat, Grain
Hybrid Berumdagass Hay
1 6.5 T
5ma11 Grain Oveneed
1.0 Tons
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
2
Low potential to contribute to
None
<
soluble nutrient leaching below
the root zone.
> 2
Moderate potential to contribute
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned
= 10
to soluble nutrient leaching
below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use
> 10
the root zone
efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge
utrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field
ractices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Suffers (391).
38G6" Database Version 2.0 Dato Printed: 07-08-2003 PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol'' means user entered data.

The Waste Ehilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing
of application to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by marlure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to
ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Dung on the requirements of the crap and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient
application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be laniwd so as to
prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
W4bw Util
ion I able
Traa
Field
Sol
ID-
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
C
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm
Fat
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
UWA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acne)
solid
Manure
Applied
(ape)
liquid
Maw=
Applied .
(Field)
solid
mmme
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
1/A
1000 Xlh
tYa
242E
DI
St t
Ahavias-CP
4.90
4.90
Corn, Gain
130 bu.
2115-6/30
148
0
0
prig.
148
88.24
0
43235
0.00
2421S
DI
SI1
Ahavistx-CP
4.90
4.90
Whcat,Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
125
- 0
0
bra .
125
74.52
0
365.16
4100
242*
F32
Sl i
Comae
9.50
8.50
Corn, Gain
85 bu.
2/15-6130
104
0
0
Irria.
104
6100
0l
7.00.
0.00
2428
D2
si l
Concave
8.50
8.50
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
911-3/31
93
0
0
brig.
93
55.45
0
471.28
0.00
2429
D3
S11
State-CP
2.50
2.50
Com, Grain
123 bu.
2/15-&30
139
0
0
Itrig.
139
82.87
0
207,17
0.00
2423
D3
SI1
State-CP
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/3l
121
0
0
hTig.
121
72.14
0
1g035
a00
6761
Bl
SI1
Altavista-CP
6.40
6.40
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6130
148
0
0
Itrig.
148
98-24
0
564.70
0.00
676
BI
SI1
Altavista-CP
6.40
6.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
125
0
0
hrig.
125
74.52
0
476.94
Q00
676
Si l
Altavista-CP
2.70
2.70
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2115-6/30
148
0
0
Irri .
148
98.18
0
238.09
0.00
676
W1Sit
Ahavista-CP
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
Irri .
125
74.48
0
201.09
0.00
-1- ---
......... ............................
396094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 WLTI' Page 1

Waste utilization Table
Year 1
Tna
I Field
Souse
LD.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
C
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Qbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Slid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Mamm
Applied
(Field)
Sk"d
Manure
Applied
tF")
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
VA
tons
1000 cab
eons
676
B3
S1 I
Altavista-CP
5.00
5.00
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2/15430
148
0
0
brjg.
148
88.18
0
440-91
0.00
676
B3
Sit
Ahavista-CR
5.00
5.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
125
0
0
brig.
125
74-48
0
372.39
0.00
676
IC2,C3
Sit
SwcCP
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
D
0
Irrig.
175
104.27
0
1.105-25
0.00
67
,C2,0
Sit
State-CP
10.60
10.60i
What, Grain
60 bu.:
9/1-3131
121
0
26
brig.
101
60.18
0
637.99
0,00
676
RIA
SI I
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Soybeans, Manurcd, Full Season
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
fl
Irrig.
100
59.62
0
2,545.69
0.00
676
RIA
Sit
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
What,Grain
35bu.
9/1-3/31
85
0
20
Itrig.
65
38.75
0
1,654.70
a00
6-1
RIS
S11
SumCP
21-90
21.80
Soybean, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9115
175
0
0
Irrig.
175
104.33
0
2,274.43
0.00
676,RIB
Sit
SmftCP
21.90
21.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.21
0
1.312.67
0.00
676
RIC
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16.10
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
170
0
0
Irrig.
170
101.35
0
1,631.75
0.00
676
RIC
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16-10
Wbeat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-3/31
1061
0
20
Irrig.
86
51-27
0
925.47
0.00
676
Sl I
Conctoe
8.00
8.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
brig.
119
70.95
0
567-56
0.00
676
S I I
Canetoc
SAX
8.00
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-3131
93
0
20
Irrig.
73
43.52
0
348.17
0.00
67
R68
SI 1
Surr.CP
14.00
14,00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
Irtjg.
175
104.33
0
1,460.64
0.00
67
Sit
Sutc-CP
14,00
14.00
W oat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
brig,
101
60.21
0
943.00
0.00
Total Applied. 1000 gdloos
19,684 b8
Lagoon liquids
Tots! Prnducod,1fl00
lam
Balance, 1000 an4
:�m
Total Applied. was
-1.i5188
0.
Manure Solids
Total Ptoduoed, font
Q
Balanoe, coos
No&= 1. to &e tract coh m, sytrbol - roan lased, otherwise, owned.
--------- ----------•--..--...-----.................--......--..........................
396094 Database Version 2.0
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
... ..................................................... . ....
Date Printed: 7/8/03
WLTT Page 2

•7
Tract
tilt
Field
ivar
Sara
LD,
1 aUli-
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm
Fart.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Qbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
- Applied
(Field)
Solid
mane
Appbkd
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
A I
tons
1000 zah
KOS
2428
DI
Sll
Altavista-CP
4.90
4.90
Cotton
850ibs.
3115-7131
76
0
0
Itrig.
76
45,31
0
22202
0.00
2429
DI
Sit
ALavists-CP
4.90
4.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
125
0
0
(trig.
125
74.52
0
365.16
&00
2423
02
Sit
Crnetoc
8.50
8.50
Cotton
700 tbs.
3/15-7/31
78
0
0
brig.
78
46.50
0
39527
0.00
242$
DZ
Sit
Conetce
8.50
8.50
Wheat, Crain
40 bu.
9/1-3131 .
93
0
0
brig.
93
55AS
0
47128
0.00
2429
D3
Sit
State-CP
2.50
2.50
Cotton
8751bs.
3/15-7131
71
0
0
Ir ig.
71
42.33
0
105.8:
0.00
2428
D3
Sit
State CP
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
121
0
0
GTig.
121
72.14
0
IM35
0- 0
676
BI
Sit
Aluvista-CP
6.40
6.40
Cotton
850 tbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
0
brig.
76
45.31
0
289.98
0.00
616
01
Sit
Aluviaa-CP
6.40
6.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
brig.
125
74.52
0
476.94
0.00
676
B2
Sit
Altavista-Ce
2.70
2.70
Cotton
850 tbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
0
brig.
76
45.28
0
122.26
OAO
676
BZ
S11
Ahavisu-CP
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
125
0
0
brig.
125
74.49
0
201.09
0.00
676
B3
Sit
Abavista-CP
5.00
5.00
Corn, Grain
130 bu.1
2115-6/30
148
0
0
brig.
148
89-181
0
440.91
0-00
676
B3
Sit
Abavisu-CP
5-00
5.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
!trig.
125
74.48
0
372.39
&00
67
)C2,C3
Sit
Swc-CP
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu,
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
brig.
175
104.27
0
1,10525
0,00
676
1,C2,C3
Sit
Swru CP
10.60
10.60
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
brig.
101
60.18
p
637.89
&00
676
ILIA
Sit
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Hybrid 13cmudagrass Hay
4.0 Torte
3/1-9/30
200
0
0
brig.
200
119,24
0
5,091.39
&00
676
RIA
SI I
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Small Grain O-Imd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0
1.272.95
0.00
676
RIB
Sit
State-CP
21.90
21.80
Hybrid BcmuW&gmu Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
289
0
0
Iri .
289
172.30
0
3,75&%
0,00
676
RIB
Sit
IStamCP
21.90
21.80
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Toots
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0
649.84
67
Rl
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16.10
Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay
3.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
152
0
0
brig.
152
90.62
0
1,458.97
67
RI
Sld
Raaoka
16.10
16.10
Small Grain Oversced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
bri ,
50
29.81
0
479.93
]0,OD
- 67
Sit
Conetoe
S.00
8.00
Hybrid BeTmudagrasa Hay
5.5 Tans
3/1-9/30
269
0
0
brig.
269
160.37
0
1,29M
67
SII
Caoeta
8.00
8.00
Small Grain Oversced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig
50
29,81
D
238.47
................--....----•.....--......-----•-----...---.........--...................................................................................-..............------------•------------- --•----..
386094 DaMbow Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 WUT Page 3

Wnct.- i ltili-Yatinn Tnatlo
Vaaa '7
k Trxx
Field
SoKd
LD.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
C
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
Comm
Fcrt.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manurc
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(trcrc)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Fidel)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
ibs/A
1000
VA
um
1000 tabseers
67
Rol
SI t
StataCP
14.00
14.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
289
0
0
Wig,
289
172.36
0
2,412,15
Q00
67
S11
State.CP 6
14.00
14.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0
41733
0.00
Total lied,1000
22,4 ,,.%
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1
Balance, 1000 gallons
-3.913 T
Total Applied, tons
Q
Manure Solids
Total Produced, teas
Q
Balance. tons
Q
Boles: 1. la the trail column, symbol — means leased, othcrwi awned.
2. Symbol 0 means user entered data.
- ---- -----------•----------•----.................-----....------...------......--...........----...---.--------.----..................------..--................------....-..-------.------.-.................-- -------------- •-------------
386094 Databaac Vemiun 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 WUT Page 4

Went^Titili7vtinrn Tal6ba
vaear A
Toast
I Field
Salem
L-D
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Ai rm
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrom
PA
Nutrimt
Req'd
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
OWA)
Applic.
I Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Mom m
Applied
(sere)
Solid
mwmm
Applied
(sere)
Iaquid
Mwnwe
Applied
(Fidel)
Sow
Norma
AppKvd
(Fkld)
N
I N
N
Ibs1A
1000
I xWA
song
1000
tons
2428
DI
Sl1
Altavista-CP
4.90
4.90
Soybeans, Manuned, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/I5
176
0
0
brig.
176
104.93
0
514.15
OAO
242E
DI
Sl 1
Altavista-CP
4.90
4.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
20
brig-
105
62.60
0
306.74
0.00
2428
132
Sl 1
Cometoe
8.50
9.50
Soybeans, Manumd, Full Season
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
hrig.
119
70.95
0
603-04
OAO
242E
D2
Sit
Conetm
8.50
8.50
Wheat, Grain
40bu.
9/1-3/31
93
0
10
frig.
73
4352
0
369.93
0=
2428
1)3
sit
Statee-CP
2.50
2.50
Soybcana, Manure:d, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9115
175
0
0
brig.
175
104-33
0
260.83
0.00
242E
D-1
Sl I
State-CP
2-50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-313I
121
Oi
20
trig.
101
60.21
0
150.54
ODD
676
81
Sl 1
AhavistY-C'P
6.40
6.40
Soybeans, Menured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
17,5
0
0
Irrig.
176
104.93
0
671.54
0.00
676
B1
S11
Ahaviste-CP
6.40
6.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
125
0
20
brig.
105
62.60
0
400.63
OA0
676
132
Sit
Afta%isft-CP
2.70
2.70
Com, Drain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
148
0
0
trig.
148
88-18
0
238.09
0.00
676
B2
sit
Altavista{Y
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
125
0
0
brig.
125
74.48
0
201.09
OA0
676
E3
S11
Altavista-CP
5.00
5-00
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
148
0
0
trig.
148
99.18
0
440.91
OA0
676
H3
SI I
Ahavista-CIA
5.00
5.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
125
0
0
Irrig,
125
74.48
0
372.39
0.00
676
1 XZ0
Sl I
State-CP
10.60
10.60
Soybmw, Mamned, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
firig.
175
104.27
0
1,105.25
0.00
676
,C2,C3
Sit
State-CP
10.60
10.60
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
121
0
20
prig.
101
60.18
0
637,89
0I10
6761
RIA
Sit
Twb m
42.70
42.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
frig.
100
59.62
0
2,545- 9
0A0
676
RIA
Sit
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
911-3/31
85
0
20
Inig,
65
39.75
s 0
1,654.70
ODD
676
RIBI
SI I
State►CP
21.80
21.90
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9115
175
0
0
frig.
175
104.33
0
2,274A3
0 00
676
RIB
Sit
State-CP
21.80
2120
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.21
0
1,312,67
0.00
676
RIC
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16.10
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
411-9115
170
0
0
brig.
170
101.35
0
1,631.75
OAO
676
RIC
Sit
Rerarroke
16.10
16.10
Wheat, 0min
55 bu.
9/1-3/31
106
0
20
frig.
86
51.27
0
825A7
OM
m
R6A
Sit
Conetoe 1
8.00
8.00
Soybeans, Menured, Full Season
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
frig.
119
70.95
0
567-%
0.00
676
R6A
Sl 1
Conetoe 1
8.00
8.00
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
911-3/31
93
0
20
frig.
73
43.52
p
349.17
OXO
.-- --------------------------------------------..---------------.------------------------------- .......-...-......-..-.... -.
386094 Database Version 2.0 �(j� `� Date Printed: 7/8/03
................. - ----- ..... - --- ............
WUT Page 5

Wacip TTfili7afinn Tnh1p
Vast I
Tract
Field
swce
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
CMD
RYE
Appiic.
I Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
FCM
Nutrient
Applied
Rea.
(IbsJA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acne)
Solid
Manure
AppW
(sere)
Liquid
Manure
AppW
(Fwld)
Solid
Marrore
Applied
(Fx"
I N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
A
toin
1000 Uft
ban
Sl1
State-CP
14.00
14.00
Soybeans, Manur.ed, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
0
1,4Ci0,64
0.00
1R
67
R
s11
state-CP
14.00
14.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
tmg.Ll±i4j0
0
943M
O.00
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 pllons
Total Produced, 1000 gallom
19,737.09
1 g,532
-1,204
Balance, 1000 gallons
Total Applied, tons
0
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tom
0.00
Balance, tom
0
Ncom, 1. b the tract coiurm. syn*ol — means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
1
----------- ........... ................ ..................... ................ ................................................... ........................................ .-......... - .-.-..---------------.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 WiTT Page 6

The Irrigation Application Factors for each Geld in this plan arc shown in the following table, Infiltration rate
varies with soils, If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not
resuh in runoff; This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that maybe applied to each field
selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any
one application event.
Inigation Appl'cation Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inchesftur)
Application Ar wunt
(inches)
2428
DI
Altavista-CP
0.50
0.96
2428
D2
Conetoe
0.60
0.72
2428
D3
state-CP
0.40
0.96
676
JBI
Altavista—CP
0.50
0.96
676
R2
Altavi=4:7
0.50
0.96
676
B3
Altavista-CP
0.50
ON
676
CI,C2,C3
Stan-Cl?
0.40
0.96
676
RIA
Tarboro
0.75
0.48
676
RIB
state-CP
0.40
0.96
676
RIC
Roanoke
0.35
1.00
676
R6A
Conetoe
0.601
0.72
676
R6B
State-CP
0.40
0.96
........................................... ............ ........ ..... I ...... ....................
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 LkF Page 1 of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each
source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out,
this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. Inmost cases, the priority nutrient is
nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc -can also be limiting' Since nutrient levels are generally
very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and
lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also, be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Gimp
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
100o gal/ac
Minim= Acres
5 Years Accunu&tion
Mini=nn Acres
10 Years Accun udation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard '
Gan 120 bu
150
13.16
I71.41
342.81
514.22
Hay 6 ton PLY_1=
3D0
26.32
85.70
171.41
257.11
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
160.69
321.39
482.08
366094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 07-08-2003 Sludge Page l of l

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or'bqual to the design storage
capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the strictures temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storaee Canacitv
Source Name
Swine Farrow -Feeder I.a oon Liquid
Design Storage Ca ci(Days
Start Date
112131
180
Plan Year
Mouth
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
137
1
3
132
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
154
I
7
123
1
8
92
1
9
127
1
10
112
l
11
147
1
12
121
2
1
108
2
2
89
2
3
l80
2
4
180
2
5
158
2
6
132
2
7
101
2
8
70
2
9
56
2
10
59
2
11
63
2
12
37
3
1
6
- ........ I
... .... .. .. .. ......... ... ..... ...
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 07-08-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the. rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall'be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than ID tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
386094 Database Version 2.0
Date Printed: 7/8/03 Specification Page 1
RECEIVED ! DENR ! DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
MAR 3 0 2009

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
brealdng dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canaL Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
..................... I .................... ........ .11
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, Vvaste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on au
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
................... ... .............. .............................
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
.......................... ................ .. ................................... .........., . .� . ... . .
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed• 7/8/03 S Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): B1, B2, B3, D1
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus wiII be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): D3
Corn CP, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommnded potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Apply 20-40 lbs/acre sulfur, 1/4 at planting and the remainder with the rest of the N. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn.
Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed:7- r , , ..........
07-08-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 11

The following crop note applies to field(s): D2
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 12" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be Broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30.40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): B1, 132, D1
Cotton CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above-65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with, characteristics needed for your
area and conditions. Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1 ". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20 25 lbs/acre N at
planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.
The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Apply 1.0 lb/acre actual boron either at planting or at
sidedress; or, foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre actual boron with 114 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other
1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting. Tissue
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton. Timely
management of insects, weeds, and excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton
production.
.....................................................
396094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 07-08-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 11

The following crop note applies to field(s): D3
Cotton CP, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible, Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your
area and conditions. Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1 ". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and 112 the potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20-25
lbs/acre N and 5 lbs/acre sulfur at planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress
application 2 to 3 weeks after first square. The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Also, apply at
least 20 lbs/acre sulfur and the remaining potash at or close to sidedressing. Apply 1/2 lb/acre actual
boron either at planting or at sidedress and foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied
at early bloom and the other 1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The boron needs to be available to the cotton
during fruiting. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status
of the cotton. Timely management of insects, weeds, and excessive vegetative growth are essential for
profitable cotton production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): D2
Cotton CP: Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15 May 5 when warm(above 65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your
area and conditions. Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1 ". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20-25 lbs/acre N at
planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.
The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Also, apply at least 201bs/acre sulfur either at planting or
at sidedressing. Apply 1.01b/acre actual boron either at planting or at sidedress; or, foliar apply 1/2
lb/acre actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other 1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later.
The boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton. Timely management of insects, weeds, and
excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton production.
.......................
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 07-08-2003 Crop Note Page 3 of 11

The following crop note applies to field(s): R 1 C
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drinage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mdr. 31. Cover sprigs l" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the fast and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to fieId(s): RIB, R6B
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Well Drained to Excessively Drained
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least .10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced F to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Sulfur will be needed on
deep sands with high leaching. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in
April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/aa N annually in split applications, usually in
April and following the first and second hay cuts. For better soils the N rate can be increased to 300
Ib/ac. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and
Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional
agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-05-2003 Crop Note Page 4 of 1

The following crop note applies to field(s); R6A
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained,
Adaptation; Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bulac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): R1A
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Well Drained to Excessively Drained
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagruss sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing -
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcasVdisked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Sulfur will be needed on
deep sands with high leaching. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in
April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N annuaIly in split applications, usually in
April and following the first and second hay cuts. For better soils the N rate can be increased to 300
IN= Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and
Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional
agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
.. .... .I -I...... ......... ...... .. ..
3S6094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed, 07-08-2003 Crop Note Page 5 of i 1

The following crop note applies to field(s): RIC
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, love -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October IS -October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Gu"rde". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): RIB, R613
Small Grain: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by S% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this
time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
FebruaryMarch.
The following crop note applies to field(s): R6A
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
.... .. ... ....... ....... ................................. ...................................... .
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 Crop Note Page b of l 1
r

The following crop note applies to field(s): R I A
Small Grain., Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Wde". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushelslacm and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushelslacre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting, Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this
time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March. The total N needed is dependent on the soil type. Apply sulfur at the rate of 5 lbs/acre at
planting and another 20 lbs/acre with the topdress N. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing
season to monitor the nutrient status of the oats, barley and rye. Timely management of diseases, insects
and weeds are essential for profitable oat, barley and rye production.
The following crop note applies to feld(s): R1C
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of FebruaryMarch. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
...........................................................................
396094 Database Version 2,0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 Crop Note Page 7 of l l

The following crop note applies to field (s): B 1, B2, P I.1) l
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at`least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Ci,C2,C3, D3, RIB, R6B
Wheat; Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20 November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area. Apply no
more than 30 lbs/aere N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at
this time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March. The total N needed is dependent on the soil type. Apply sulfur at the rate of 5 lbs/acre at
planting and another 20 Ibs/acre with the topdress N. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing
season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are
essential for profitable wheat production-
....... ..... ... .. .. .................. .... .......
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 Crop Note Pee 8 of 13

The following crop note applies to field(s): D2, R6A
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rare modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by atleast 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): R1A
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area. Apply no
more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at
this time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March. The total N needed is dependent on the soil type. Apply sulfur at the rate of 5 lbs/acre at
planting and another 20 lbs/acre with the topdress N. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing
season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are
essential for profitable wheat production.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 07-08-2 003 Crop Note Page 9 of 11

The following crop note applies to field(s); Rl C
Soybeans -Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20-May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): B1, D1
Soybeans -Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20 May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): C1,C2,C3, D3, RIB, R6B
Soybeans -Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, highly leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20-May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 wed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
......................... ....... ....I . ...............I ........ .............. .. .........................
38604 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07.08-2003 Cr Note Page 10 of 11

14
The following crop note applies to field(s): D2, R6A
Soybeans -Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20-May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 112" and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): R1A
Soybeans Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, highly leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20-May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-301bs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
................ . .. .................... ...1...................... .....................
3BW94 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-06-2003 Crop Note Page 11 of 11

AWT
AgrMasteTechnology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
www.agriwaste.com
Email: [e-mail]
July 6, 2007
The HANOR Company, Inc.
6717 NC 97 West
Route 2, Box 117
Battleboro, NC 27809
RE: PLAT rating of Pivot One of Caj One's facility
Dear Mr. Jordan:
The four quadrants of Pivot One of the Caj One facility have been consolidated into one
field. Based on the documentation presented in Table 1, the PLAT rating for the entire
pivot is currently rated as Medium.
Table 1: Pivot 1 Field Information at the Caj-One Facility
Portion of Field
PLAT Rating
NE Quarter
Medium
NW Quarter
Medium
Southeast Quarter
High
Southwest Quarter
Medium
Entire Field
Medium
Sincerely:
L. M. Safley, Jr., Ph. D., P. E.
President
JAI 1 anon-NC1211 137.doc
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Agtlifpr Prntprtinn gection
MAR 3 U 2009
,`14y115111ff,f
CA
R��I
H •'• . Ilk
US
SEAL
10264 rill:
In-st1
V�
4t--- 9

Awwr
AgrMaste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
www.agriwaste.com
Email: [e-mail]
July 6, 2007
The MANOR Company, Inc.
6717 NC 97 West
Route 2, Box 117
Battleboro, NC 27909
RE: PLAT rating of Pivot One of Caj One's facility
Dear Mr. Jordan:
The four quadrants of Pivot One of the Caj One facility have been consolidated into one
field. Based on the documentation presented in Table 1, the PLAT rating for the entire
pivot is currently rated as Medium.
Table 1: Pivot 1 Field Information at the Ca' -One Facility
Portion of Field
PLAT Rating
NE Quarter
Medium
NW Quarter
Medium
Southeast Quarter
Hi h
Southwest Quarter
Medium
Entire Field
Medium
Sincerely:
`KIti1CA Rol
111111�1�f
SS10N'• ;
L. M. Safley, Jr., P . D., P. E. SE AL
President
10264
�I •.pp• � ' \1
RECEIVED f DEINR 1 D '�+r+el�lnir'�►
Aquifer Protection Section
J:ISanor-NC1211137.doc
MAI? 3 4 2009

C„J
-
Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool Completion
Name of Facility:
Owner(s) Name:
Mailing Address: (0911 NL c111
Check the appropriate box below, and sign at the bottom:
❑ No fields received a high or very high rating.
�. Yes, the fields listed below received a high or very high rating:
Facility Number: 3 - L r
Phone No:-,z�2 --L1 C) 3 --"l
Field Number Size_(Acres) Ratinf., High or Very_ High)
Please use as many additional attachment forms (PLAT-A-12-15-05) as needed for additional fields.
By completing the above section and any additional attachments and by signing this form, the facility
owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge all application fields were evaluated using the Phosphorus
Loss Assessment Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct the Assessment. A copy will
be kept on site with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be
approved by a technical specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. Waste plans with fields having a high or very high rating will have to be modified to
address phosphorus loss by the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007.
Owner Name:
Owner
Technical Specialist N
Technical Specialist Signature:
Submit this form to:
NC Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLAT-12-1"5
Date:
Phone No: 2S - 923 -
RECEIVED ! DENR ! DWQ
Agllifp.r PrntPrtinn SpGtlon
MAR 3 0 2M

'ANAT Version: 1.95
.AT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 8:31:02 AM
INPUTS
endar Year:
2006
)unty:
Edgecombe
-oducer Identifier:
Hanor-Caj1
-act Number:
2428
geld Number:
1
Al Series:
TaB: Tarboro loamy sand,
0 to 6 percent slopes
-op:
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
=_rtilizers:
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.62 ac in
Lb P2O5:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
pplications
oil Loss:
2 t/ac/yr
eceiving Slope Distance
30'-49 ft
oil Test 0" -- 8"
187
WV —Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
cil Test 28" - 32"
53
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
ydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
ARTICULATE P = 3
JBLE P = 8
,EACHATE P = 15
'OURCE P = 4
'OTAL P RATING = 30
(MEDIUM)

ANAT Version: 1.95
AT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:09:46 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year:
2006
unty:
Edgecombe
oducer identifier:
Hanor-Caj1
act Number:
676
eld Number:
2
Ii1 Series:
TaB: Tarboro loamy sand,
0 to 6 percent slopes
.op:
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
!rtilizers:
Swine --Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.62 ac in
Lb P205:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
)plications
)il Loss:
2 t/ac/yr
�ceiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
)il Test 0" -- 8"
230
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
)il Test 28„ - 32"
92
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
rdrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
kRTICULATE P = 4
JBLE P = 10
EACHATE P = 27
OURCE P - 4
OTAL P RATING = 45 (HIGH)

ANAT Version: 1.95
AT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:11:27 AM
INPUTS
sendar Year: 2006
unty: Edgecombe
oducer Identifier: Hanor-Cajl
act Number: 676
eld Number: 3
-il Series: TaB: Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
'op: Soybeans (Full Season) : Conventional Tillage
!rtilizers: Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.62 ac in
Lb P2O5: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
)plications
)il Loss: 2 t/ac/yr
;ceiving Slope Distance 30-49 ft
Al Test 0" - 8" 9
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.4
�drologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
kRTICULATE P = 0
)LUBLE P = 0
.HATE P = 0
DURCE P = 4
OTAL P RATING = 4 (LOW)

kNAT version: 1.95
kT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:15:20 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year:
2006
unty:
Edgecombe
oducer Identifier:
Hanor-Caj1
act Number:
2428
eld Number:
4
it Series:
StB: State loamy sand, 0
to 4 percent slopes
op:
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
rtilizers:
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P2O5:
53.4. lb
Application Method:
All other surface
,plications
ail Loss:
2 t/ac/yr
.ceiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
)il Test 0" - 8"
99
WV —Factor (DATABASE)
1.3
,drologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
kRTICULATE P = 2
)LUBLE P 8
:HATE P - 0
OURCE P = 23
OTAL P RATING = 33 (MEDIUM)

hNAT Version: 1.95
AT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:25:13 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year:
2006
unty:
Edgecombe
oducer Identifier:
Hanor-Cajl
'act Number:
2428
eld Number:
5
ail Series:
CeB: Conetoe loamy sand,
0 to 4 percent slopes
-op:
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conservation Tillage - minimum
tsidue
!rtilizers:
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.21 ac in
Lb P205:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
)plications
Al Loss:
2 t/ac/yr
sceiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
Al Test 0" -- 4"
507
WV,Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
ail Test 28" - 32"
58
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
yrdrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
'"TICULATE P = 8
OLUBLE P = 10
EACHATE P - 18
OURCE P = 2
'OTAL P RATING = 38 (MEDIUM)

+NAT version: 1.95
kT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:30:51 AM
lendar Year:
anty:
oducer Identifier:
act Number:
eld Number:
it Series:
op.
rtilizers:
,plications
dl Loss :
!ceiving Slope Distance
,il Test 0" - 8"
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
,drologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P - 2
)LUBLE P - 6
--HATE P = 0
DURC E P
DTAL P RATING =
23
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Cajl
2428
6
StB: state loamy sand, 0
to 4 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P2O5:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
81
1.3
GOOD
OUTPUTS
31 (MEDIUM)

ANAT Version: 1.95
AT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:42:44 AM
lendar Year:
unty:
oducer Identifier
act Number:
eld Number:
ail Series:
.op .
:rtilizers:
)plications
)il Loss:
?ceiving Slope Distance
)il Test 0" -- 8"
WV —Factor (DATABASE)
1drologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P =
2
DLUBLE P =
8
:HATE P =
0
OURCE P -
23
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Caj1
2428
7
StB: State loamy sand, 0
to 4 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P2O5:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
103
1.3
GOOD
OUTPUTS
CTAL P RATING = 33 (MEDIUM)

GNAT Version: 1.95
%T Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:40:33 AM
INPUTS
iendar Year: 2006
linty: Edgecombe
oducer identifier: Hanor-Caj1
act Number: 676
eld Number: 8
it Series: AaA: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Op. Soybeans (Full Season) : Conservation Tillage -- minimum
sidue
rtilizers: Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.17 ac in
Lb P2O5: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
)plications
)il Loss: 2 t/ac/yr
�ceiving Slope Distance 30-49 ft
)il Test 0" - 4" 116
WV —Factor (DATABASE) 1.3
-tificial Drainage System: NO
rdrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
%RTICULATE P = 3
JBLE P - 12
EACHATE P = 0.
OURCE P - 30
OTAL P RATING = 45 (MEDIUM)

Client: HANOR-NC
The Hanor Company, Inc.
Revised: 6/202008
_
CajOne
8y. HL
2008 Nitrogen Uptake Spreadsheet
Nitrogen
Soo
Soil
Field
Slope
Realistic
Until
Removed
Iba N
Field # Acres Series
Type
Symbol
%
Crop
Yield
Acre
Ibsfunit
per M.
1 83.5 TerborolRoanoke
Loamy Sand
TaStRo
0-6
Soybemts
29
Bu
3.94
114.26
2 20.5 ConetnedState
Loamy Sand
CeBIStB
0-6
Pead Miset (hay)
5.2
tons
51.5
267.80
3 27.6 TarborolSlatefConetoe
Loamy Sand
TaBfSOCOS
0-6
Pearl M41at (hay) 4.63
tans
52.6
243.54
4 34.60 ABavistalRoanoke
Fine sandy loam
AaAlRc
0-3
Soybeans
38
au
3.89
147.82
1 83.5 TarboralRbanoke
Loamy Sand
TaBllie
0-6
Wheat
45
bu
2.18
98.10
2 20.5 ConewelState
Loamy Sand
Ce87StB
0-6
Wheat
2
tons
50
100,00
3 27.6 TarborolStaWConstos
Loamy Sand
TaWStBICeB
0-6
Wheat
2
tons
50
100.00
4 34.60 Altavista/Roanoke
Fine sandy loam
AaAFRc
0-3
Wheat
58
bu
2.01
116.58
166.2
Total lbs
N utilized:
Weighted Average:
' Indicates an assumed R.Y.E. Field 8 - cotton rate information shown for entire
field to be conservative.
Nibumn Produced from Effluent
Nitrogen Produced front Sludge
Sludge
#
lbs N
Year
WL Avg.
Ebslunh
Animals
Produced
BIGfF Site
1 264.1507148
0.88
48W
4224
# of animal units:
4800
3 264.1507148
0.88
4800
12672
tbs Nfanimal unit
6.5
6 264A507148
0.88
4800
25344
lbs N produced:
31200
9 264.1507148
0.88
4800
38016
Nursery $Its
1 264.1507148
0.076
0
a
# of animal units:
0
3 264.1507148
0.076
0
0
lbs Nfanimai unit
0.413
6 264.1507148
0.076
a
0
lbs N produced:
0
9 264.1507148
0.076
0
0
WF Site
1 264.1507148
0.37
0
0
# of animal units:
0
3 264A507146
0.37
0
0
lbs Nfanimal unit
2.3
6 264,1507148
0.37
0
0
lbs N produced:
0
9 264.1507148
0.37
0
0
Einar Stud Site
1 26C1507148
0.61
0
0
# of animal units:
0
3 264.1507148
0.61
0
0
ibs Nfanknai unit
3.7
6 264.150714E
0.61
0
0
ibs N produced:
0
9 264.1507148
0.61
0
0
Total The N Produced from Effluent:
31200.00
Total lbs N Produced
from Sludge In 3 yearm
12672,00
Deficit 1-ySurplus (+) Utilized (lbs):
12701.35
Deficit (-)ISurplus (-) Utilized
(Ibs):
29.85
.jQ M
G_ 0
m
0
C
CZ,z
C=
ro-
t? d
Total N
(lbs)
9540.71
5489.90
672165
5114.57
8191.35
2050.00
2760.00
4033.67
43901.65
264.16
Acres
15.9908709E
47.97261294
95.94522589
143.9178388
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
Application
Period
Apr 1 - Sep 15
Mayt - Sept
May 1 - Sep i
Apr I - Sep 15
Sept 1 - April 30
Od1-Mar 31
Oct 1 - Mar 31
Sept 1 - April 30

Client: HANOR-NC
Re+ised: 411412W8
By, )V
The Manor Company. Inc.
Caj-0n■
2008 Nitrogen Uptake Spreadsheet
Soil
Soil
Field
Slope
Field 0
Arras Series
Type
Symbol
%
1
83.5 Tarboro/Roanoke
Loamy Sand
TaWRo
0-6
2
20.5 CdnetwState
Loamy Sand
CeBIS(B
Ofi
3
276 Tarbord5tate)Conetoe
Loamy Sand
TaBfStBlCe6
0-6
4
34.60 AilavistalRoanoke
Fne sandy loam
AaAIRo
0-3
1
83.5 TadiorolRoanoke
Loamy Sand
ToBlRo
0.6
2
20.5 Conetoo/State
Loamy Sand
CeBlStB
0-6
3
27.6 TarborolState/Conetoe
Loamy Sand
TaB/StBlCeB
"
4
34.60 AltavislalRoanoke
Fine sandy loam
AaArRo
0-3
166.2
' Indicates an assumed R.Y.E. Feld 8 - cotton rate Information shown for entire field to be conservative.
Nitrooen Produced from Effluent
SIGIF Site
# of animal units:
Ibs Wanimal unit:
Ibs N produced:
Nursery Site
# of animal units:
Ibs Wanimal unit:
lbs N produced:
GIF Site
# of animal units:
Ibs Wanimal unit -
its N produced:
Boar Stud Site
# of animal units:
lbs Nlanirnal unit:
Ibs N produced:
Total ibs N Produced from Effluent:
Deficit (-)fSurptus I-) Utilized (ibs):
48M
6.5
31200
0
0.48
0
0
2.3
0
0
3.7
0
31200.00
13292.74
Nitrogen
Realistic
Until/
Removed Ibs N
Clop
Yield
Acre
Ibsiunit per as
Soybeans
29
Bu
3.94 114.26
Bermudagrass
6
tons
47 282.00
aennudagrass
5.3
tons
48 254.40
Soybeans
38
Bu
3.89 147.82
Wheat
45
bu
2.18 98.10
Wheat
2
tons
50 100.00
Wheat
2
tons
50 100.00
Wheat
56
bu
2.01 I1&58
Total We N utilized:
Weighted Average:
Nitrogen Produced from
Sludge
Sludge
0
Ibs N
Year WL Avg.
Ibsfunit
Animals
Produced
1 267.70W168
0.88
4800
4224
3 267.7060166
OM
48M
12672
6 267.7050168
0.88
48M
75344
9 267.7060168
0.88
48M
30016
1 267.7060160
0.076
0
0
3 267.7060168
0.076
0
0
6 267.7060168
0.076
0
0
9 267J060168
0.076
0
0
1 267.7060168
OX
0
0
3 267.7060168
0.37
0
0
6 267.7060168
0.37
0
0
9 267.7060168
0.37
0
0
1 267.7060168
0.61
0
0
3 267.7060168
0.61
0
0
6 267.7060166
0.61
0
0
9 267.7060168
0.61
0
0
Total Ibs N Produced from Sludge in 3 years: 12672.00
Defldt (-ySurplus (4) utilized (Ibs(: 620.74
Total N
(Ibs)
9540.71
5781.00
7021.44
5114.57
8191.36
2050.00
2760.00
4033.67
44492.74
267.71
Acres
15.T7850229
47.33550687
94.67101374
142.0065206
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Application
Period
Apr 1 - Sep 15
Mar 1 - Sep 30
Mar 1 - Sep 30
Apr 1 - Sep 15
Sept 1 - April 30
Oct 1 - Mar 31
Oct 1 - Mar 31
Sept t - April 30

- lhf6
Type of Visit: CD Co nee Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit; Routine0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ` County:
Farm Name: Q r1/C Owner Email. -
Owner Name:
a.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ' So- J -et a
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Current
C►urgent
Ihsin3Current
Wet Poultry CapaPop.
1JEDesign
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
]Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, PAoultr„ Ca acit P■o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
,- No 0 NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
N A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation`?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NI?
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: 3 - O Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
�y e(
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes o [] NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application`? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of AcceptableCropWindow/ ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): efG� _ 26Y / A17 eek—ox
i3. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
I�N�o NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ YesVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspection Q Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - oj Date of Ins ection. r/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
y- 7
3 Cb 1- (-f o ,- y
P S. r
51,45d 92"14r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � s lD'�✓���
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412015

a- Z 7- l f
`Type of Visit: 0 Com ce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
(Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access 1i
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: (� ,(��;1' 42— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: P)e ( I SA'C16", Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
I INon-LaXer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr. P.oultr. Ca aci P.o P.
Layers
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
C] NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesFN
o ❑ NA
❑ N1
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

d
Facility Dumber: jDate of Inspection: Ca — $ ^ 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes
Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: — 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): l( f t g Z I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �Noo NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmrNo.,[:]
eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): cor n ( h9 J f'Qi- f "kg".a
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�No❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KN9, ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o [] NA
❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
2 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No 0 NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers [] Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
Judge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[] Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[:]No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412014 Continued

Facility Number: 53 -a
Date of Inspection: - a? e
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary):
�'�Ilf�rg���-r +�Jr-r �fy SGcr✓Qy d-cce cal# ->LLt o y►2_
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 17 9 ( - Y 2r p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
13e yJe. (owl
Date: 0 -2 I -,�-
Page 3 of 3 21412014

(Type of Visit: 0 Co ance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
" " 1
Arrival Time:/
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
�^�-�T�'}
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: n r_{ cJa j" Ct�} Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
WePoultry
La er
Non -Layer
Dr. P,oultr.
Design
C**opacity
Design
Ca aci
Current
Pop.
Current
P,o
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pap.
DairyCow
DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef $rood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Puults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 7,91X
❑ NA ❑ NE
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Faeili Number: Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) TTTT
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
Ml..Nl
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ YesgN
N ❑ NA
�❑
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
FZ Ko ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
fo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
oe
/
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o NA
[:3NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes PAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 613a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N 6 NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2 No [DNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No i NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? El Ye o 0 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments, ,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations use additional pages as necessar .g el
Vk Jl %-(i s �-/I-e- C( C-t -cos f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 -/! — V Z-O p
Date:
21412011

7
: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ,
Raleigh Regional Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION S DATE/TIME 4h612— UU Oro
NAME Q" co P REPRESENTING 6S(AS
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the _Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to cant' out our day-to-day program
obligations.. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Apgointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 4:45
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number, as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is 2.5 cents for ALL copies if making more than 25 copies - there is no charge if
less than 25 copies are made. Payment is to be made by check, money order, or cash in the
administrative offices.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. No briefcases, large totes, etc. are permitted in the file review area. To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
fi. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
2.
3.
4.
5.
L) c.t. S W /q 2G Z : UU
LL
Signature and Name of Firm/Business Date Time In Time Out
Please attach a business card to this form if available

CCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 1, 2009
The Hanor Company Inc
CAJ One Inc
6717 NC Hwy 97 W
Battleboro, NC 27809
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330008
CAJ One Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear The Hanor Company Inc:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to The Hanor Company Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the CAJ One Inc, located in Edgecombe County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud-
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: 4800 Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS330008 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring ' data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keening and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchangc wi h this
General Permit. Please_srontinue to use the some record keeping forms.
1636 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1638
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd„ Relef h, North Carotlna 27604 e
Phone: 91g.733.32211 FAX: 919-715-M k Customer Service:1-877-623-6746 Carofina
latemel: www.ncwaterqualily.ag �atura!!
An Equal opportunity 1 AtAmratira Acton Employer y

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.goy/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at (919) 7914200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Z&�e
for Colcen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS330008)
AFO Notebooks
The Hanor Company Inc

Client HONOR -NC
Revised. 3117r2t1D6
By: HL
The Hanor Company, Inc.
Caj-One
2009 Nitrogen Uptake Spreadsheet
Soil
Soil
Plaid
Slope
Realistic
Unit/
Field #
Acre
Series
Type
Symbol
%
Crop
Yield
Acre
1
10.9
Altavista
Fine Sandy Loom
AaA
0-3
Soybeans
45
lbs
2
17.2
Tarboro
Loamy Sand
Tag
0-6
Soybeans
25
lbs
3
11.0
Tarboro
Loamy Sand
Tag
0-6
Soybeans
25
Ibs
4
15.50
Tarboro
Loamy Send
TeB
0-6
Soybeans
25
Bu
5
9.10
COneme
Loamy $and
CeB
04
Soybeans
29
Bu
6
20.80
State
Loamy Send
StB
0-4
Soybeans
45
Bu
7
32.90
State
Loamy Sand
Ste
0-4
Soybeans
45
Bu
a
26.3
Altavista
Fine Sandy Loam
AaA
0-3
Soybeans 8 Cotton
850
lbs
9
9.0
Altavista
Fine Sandy Loam
AaA
Oa
Soybeans
45
Bu
1
10.9
Altavista
Fine Sandy Loam
AaA
0 7
1AtleetlRye
2
Tars
2
17.2
Tarboro
Loamy Sand
tee
0-6
hhavRye
2
Tons
3
11.0
Tarboro
Loamy Sand
TeB
0-6
ftaVRye
2
Tons
4
15.5
Tarboro
Loamy Sand
Tag
0-6
NhauRye
2
Tons
5
9.1
C"Wtoe
Loamy Sand
CeB
04
Mat/%v
2
Tons
6
20.8
State
Loanry Sand
Sta
0.4
1AhattRye
2
Tons
7
32.9
State
Loamy Sand
Ste
04
NhaVRye
2
Torts
8
26.3
Altavista
Fine Sandy Loam
AaA
03
lAhatlRya
2
Tans
9
9.0
Altavista
Rne Study Loam
AaA
0-3
VNteaVRye
2
Tom
152.7
IndlCates an assumed R.Y E. FWd 8 - co0m rate information shown for entire field to be co nservalive,
Nitrogen Produced from EMueM
WG/F She
# of animal units:
48M
Ibs NMrunlal unit
6.5
Ibs N produced:
312t10
Nursery Site
# of animal units
0
lbs NA rumal unit
0.48
roe N produced:
0
G/F Site
9 at animal units:
0
Ibs Nlmimal unit.
2.3
lbs N produced:
0
Boar Stud site
N of animal outs:
0
Ibs Niantmal unit.
3.7
Ibs N produced:
0
Total Ibs N Produced from Effluent:
3120&00
Deficit (ySraplus (#) Utilized (lbs):
4308.63
Nitrogen
Removed Ibs N
ibWunk per aQ
3.91 175,95
4 100 GC
3.99 97.25
3.89 97.25
3.98 115A2
3.89 175.D5
3.89 175.D5
0.089 75.65
3.91 175.95
50 100.00
50 100.00
50 100.00
50 100-00
50 100-00
50 100.00
50 100,00
50 100.00
50 100.00
Total Our N utilized:
Weighted Average:
Nhrgage
Prodlxed horn
Sludge
Sludge
#
Iba N
Veal
Wt Avg.
lbs/unit
Ar+mals
Produced
1
23253852
0.88
4800
4224
3
232.53852
0.88
48W
12672
6
23253852
Dag
4aW
25344
9
232.63852
0,88
48W
39016
1
23253852
0.076
0
0
3
23253852
0.076
0
0
6
232 53852
0.076
0
0
9
23263852
0076
0
0
' 1
23253852
0.37
0
0
3
232.53852
0.37
0
a
6
232.53852
'• 0,37
0
0
9
232.5U52
0.37
0
0
1
232.53852
0.61
D
D
3
23253352
0.61
0
0
6
232.53852
D.61
0
0
9
232538b2
0.61
D
0
Total lbs N Produced from Sludge in 3 years: 1267200
Deficit (•YSurplus (.) Utilized (thej:-8383.37
Total N Application
(lbs) Period
1917,86 A;d t-WI 15
172000 April 1 - Sept 15
10075 Apra 1 - Sept 15
1507.38 April 1 - Sept 15
1050.32 April 1 - Sept 15
3641.04 APM 1- Sept 15
5759,15 " 1 . Sept 15
1989.60 March 15 - Aug 1 (cotton) April 1- Sept 15 (soybeans)
1683.56 April 1 - Sept 15
1090.00 Sept 1- March 31 (rye) Sept 1 - April 30 (What)
172000 Sept 1- March 31 (rye) Sept 1 - April 30 (What(
1100OD Sept 1- March 31 (rye) Sept 1 -April 30 (wheat)
1550,00 Sept T - March 31 (rye) Sept 1 - April 30 (what)
910,00 Sept 1- Mardi 31 (rye) Sept 1 - April 30 (what)
2080AD Sept t - March 31 (rye) SW 1 - April 30 (what)
3290.00 Sept 1 - Match 31 (rye) Sept 1 - April 30 (what)
2630.0D Sept 1 - March 31 (rye) Sept 1 -April 30 (what)
900.011 Sept 1-March 31(rye) sept 1 -April 30 (wheat)
35508.33
23Z54
Acres
18.16473245
54.49419735
108,9e83347
163.4825921
0
0
a
D
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0

C r . + 1-
Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool Completion
Name of Facility: ��r'� t Facility Number:. a'
Owner(s) Name: ` ` 1:�� , c;_ ,�, ( _ _ Phone No:.
Mailing Address:
Check the appropriate box below, and sign at the bottom:
❑ No fields received a high or very high rating.
Yes, the fields listed below received a high or very high rating:
Field Number Size Acres Rating (High or Very High)
Please use as many additional attachment forms (PLAT -A- 124 5-05) as needed for additional fields.
By completing the above section and any additional attachments and by sigrtng this form, the facility
owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge all application fields were evaluated using the Phosphorus
Loss Assessment Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct -the Assessment. A copy will
be kept on site with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be
approved by a technical specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. Waste plans with fields having a high or very high rating will have to be modified to
address phosphorus loss by the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007.
Owner Name. n
Owner- Signature. g �. _ � , - �. ' - _ Date.
' l
Submit this form to:
NC Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Semice Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLAT-12-15-05

NCANAT Version: 1.95
'' M
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 8:31:02 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil LOSS:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Soil Test 28" - 32"
WV --Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P - 3
JBLE P = 8
LEACHATE P = 15
SOURCE P - 4
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Caj1
2428
1
TaB: Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) : Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.62 ac in
Lb P205: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
187
1.4
53
1.4
GOOD
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING = 30 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.95
r !
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:09:46 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2006
County:
Edgecombe
Producer Identifier:
Hanor-Cajl
Tract Number:
676
Field Number:
2
Soil Series:
Crop:
TaB: Tarboro loamy sand,
0 to 6
Fertilizers:
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Swine
ConventionalnTillages
-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.62 ac in
Lb P2O5:
53.4 lb
applications
Application Method:
All other surface
Soil Loss:
2 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
Soil Test 0 -, -- 8 °
230
WV Factor'(DATABASE)
1.4
Soil Test 28" - 32"
92
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.4
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 4
jBLE P = 10
LEACHATE P = 27
SOURCE P = 4
TOTAL P RATING = 45 (HIGH)

NCANAT Version: 1.95
t
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P - 0
I CHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 4
TOTAL P RATING = 4 (LOW)
8/22/2006 9:11:27 AM
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Cajl
676
3
TaB: Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) : Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.62 ac in
Lb P2O5: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft.
9
1.4
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.95
r
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe
8/22/2006 9:15:20 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2006
County:
Edgecombe
Producer Identifier:
Hanor-Cajl
Tract Number:
2428
Field Number:
4
Soil Series:
Crop:
StB: State Loamy sand, 0
to 4 percent slopes
Fertilizers:
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Swine
Conventional Tillage
-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P205:
.53.4 lb
applications
Application Method:
All other surface
Soil Loss:
2 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
Soil Test 0" - 8"
99
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.3
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P - 8
L. _`HATE P _ 0
SOURCE P = 23
TOTAL P RATING = 33 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.95
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:25:13 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
residue
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil LOSS:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
Soil. Test 28" - 32"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
P"^TICULATE P = 8
SOLUBLE P - 10
LEACHATE P = 1$
SOURCE P = 2
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Cajl
2428
5
CeB: Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) : Conservation Tillage - minimum
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.21 ac in
Lb P205: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
507
1.4
58
1.4
GOOD
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING = 38 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.95
r ►
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV -Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
8/22/2006 9:30:51 AM
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Caj1
2428
6
StB: State loamy sand, 0
to 4 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P205:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
81
1.3
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P = 6
L_ -'HATE P = 0
SOURCE P - 23
TOTAL P RATING = 31 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Vorsion: 1.95
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe
1
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 8"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
8/22/2006 9:42:44 AM
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Caj1
2428
7
StB: State loamy sand, 0
to 4 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) :
Conventional Tillage
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.06 ac in
Lb P205:
53.4 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft.
103
1.3
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P - 2
SOLUBLE P 8
L -HATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 23
TOTAL P RATING = 33 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.95
,r
PLAT Results For: Edgecombe 8/22/2006 9:40:33 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
residue
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WVFactor (DATABASE)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P _
.3
S 1BLE P -
12
LEACHATE P =
0
SOURCE P
30
INPUTS
2006
Edgecombe
Hanor-Cajl
676
8
AaA: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Soybeans (Full Season) : Conservation Tillage - minimum
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 6.17 ac in
Lb P2O5: 53.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
116
1.3
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING = 45 (MEDIUM)

F W a rFq Mlchaol F. Easley, Governor
` ► b-ta-�-i
Wlfllem O, Ross Jr., 8ocrotary
North Carolina Departmentof Envlronmont and Natural RosourcasAlan W. Wirnek, P, E., Dirocux
v�c
V ion Divisof Water Ouallty
Apri19, 2003
CAJ One Inc
CAJ One Inc
1151 Maple Swamp Rd
Tarboro NC 27886
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA233008
CAJ One Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear CAJ One Inc.
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The .General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance withyour application received on April 8, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to CAJ One Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS330008 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the CAJ One Inc, located in EdgecombeCounty, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 4800 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
--------------facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised fortes used for record keeping and reporting. ?lease ggy careful attenyon to the record keepin>r
and monitoring conditions ilL this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop, t' Events dorm
must be returned -to _the^Div_i§iQn of _Water Quality no later than 120 days following : pt of tt�e
Non-Dlscharyo Pam Ming Unit Internet httpJrtt2o.onr,state.nc,usWpu
1817 Mal Service Center, Ralslph, NC 27999.1617 Telephone [phone]tiSO133 Fax (919)715-so4e
Customer Service Center Telooxxv 1 BDQ 623.7748
An Equal Opportunity Actkan Ernnlover snac ,d,,,,, -AbInCK ----

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWNT may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namelownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] eat. 544.
Sincerely,
,Zdel-
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
M. (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Deparnnent
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA 133008
Permit File AWS330008
NDPU Files
APR 2 3 M

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
CAJI Phase !1
Berry Jr. Anderson
Route 2 Box 21 S-C
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-823-4668
07-08-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Margaret Knight
Edgecombe SWCD
201 St. Andrew Street
POBox 10 ITI
Tarboro, NC 27886
41-7900
D elop ignature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
's plan.
rLiL 'Tr 7—�O — 0 3
Si (owner) W Date
J
Signature (manager 4 producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: -7 /1 D
i Te cal 4ecialist S ate
............ .................. ................. ....... ......... .............. ........................ .... ..
386094 Database Version -.0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S11
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 18,532,800 pis/year
by a 4,800 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This
oduction facility has waste stora a capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
28599
Incorporated
49116
Injected
54089
Irrigated
31086
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
33,021.00
19,684,682
-1,151,882
Year 2
37,653.50
22,446,560
-3,913,760
Year 3
33,108.90
19,737,086
-1,204,286
•
Noro: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined sauna,
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07.08-2003 Source Page l of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field, Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan, fn addition, the (reaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
I.esching
Index (U)
Soil Sexes
Crop Sequence
RYE
2428
D1
NIA
Altavista-CP
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Cotton
850 lbs,
wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
2428
D2
NIA
Conetoe
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Cotton
700 N.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
30 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
2428
D3
NIA
State-CP
Com, Grain
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Cotton
875 tbs.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manurod, Fun Season
45 bu.
Wheal Grain
60 bu.
676
BI
NIA
Altavista-CP
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
What, Cnaut
60 bu.
Cotwn
850 lbs.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
Wit, Grain
60 bu.
676
B2
NIA
Altavista-CP
Can, Grain
t 30 bu.
Wheat. Grain
60 bu.
Cotton
850
Wheat. Grain
60 bu.
676
B3
NIA
Altavista-CP
Can, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 b ,
676
1.C2,C3
NIA
State-CP
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
Wheat. Grain
676
RIA
NIA
Tarboro
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
25 bu,
Wheat, Grain
35 bu,
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4 ,0 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
676
RIB
NIA
State-CP
Soybeans. Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
................................................
386094 Database Version 2.0 i)ate Panted: 07-03-2003 PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE, Symbol 11 mewm user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leashing
Index (Lq
Soil Series
amsequence
RYE
Wheat, drain
02 bu,
Hybrid f3crmwRorass Hay
Small drain Ovamod
I.
676
RIC
N/A
Roanoke
Soybearu, Manured, Full Season
q4
Wheat, Grain
Hybrid Bernwdagraas Hay
Small Crain Overseed
I.0 T
676
R6A
N/A
Comm
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
10 by,
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Hybrid Bermudagram Hay
5.5 Tons
Small Grain Ovmwed
to Tons
676
R6B
N/A
Sute-CP
SoYbean+, Manured, Fun Season
45 bu.
Wheat, Grain
1 60 bu.
LE
Hybrid BmwAagram flay
64ToTis
Small Grain Overseed
I in Tons
LI
Potential Leacj'a
Technical Guidance
2
Low potential to contribute to
None
soluble nutrient leaching below
the root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<=10
to soluble nutrient leaching
below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use
> 10
the root zone,
efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge
nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of --field
ractices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
......................................................................................................................................
s86094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 PCs Page 2. of 2
NOTE. Symbol 0 mans user entered data,

The Wane Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acm of cropland
aw,&d to use the nutrients being produced The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing
of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table In.
ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient
application amounts with the realistic yields of the crap to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as io
p vwt over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
ovasw Litinzaiion
i ante Year
i
rract
Field I
scree
VD.
soil series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
I Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
Comm.
Fort.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(IbslA)
Applic.
Method
Mature
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Mature
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Mxw=
Appbod
(Field)
Sow
Idmoe
Appbcd
(FkAd)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
aVA I
tun •
1000 Qals
am
2429
DI
SI I
Aluvisu-CP
4.90
4.90
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
148
0
0
brig.
148
88.24
0
43235
a00
242*
DI
Sl 1
AhavisuCP
4.90
4.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig.
125
74.52
0
365.16
a0t3
242S
D2
III
(Uwm*m
8.50
8.50
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2115-W30
104
0
0
Irrig.
1 104
63.00
0
537.0-1
t100
2428
112
Sl r
C40ctnc
8.50
8.50
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-3/31
93
0
0
brig.
1 93
55-451
0
471.29
0.00
2.423
ri3
S11
SweCP
2.50
2.50
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/IS-W30
139
0
0
Irrig.
139
82.87
0
207.17
0.00
2428
D3
Sl 1
Stzu.-CP
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
0
brig.
121
72.14
0
190-35
0-00
676
Bl
$11
AhavisuCP
6.40
6.40
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
148
0
0
Irrig.
148
8824
0
564.70
0.00
67
111
S11
AltavistaCP
6.40
6.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3131
125
0
0
Irrig.
125
74.52
0
476,94
0.00
/a7
62
S 1 r
Ahavista-CP
2.70
2.70
Can, Grain
130 bu.
2115-6/30
148
0
0
Irrig.
148
88. i 8
0
238.09
0-00
67
Br2
5I1
Altavista-Cl?
2.70L
2.70
Wheal, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig.
125
74.48
0
201.09
0.00
•-- ---. ...................................•--------.....----..............---..........................-.---..................................---.............--...........----....-........-----.....--...-------•----------
"0% Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 wur Page 1

vv- tc
fm
► rr
Field
rvri
Source
LD.
a rc
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm-
Fcrt.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manus
PA'
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(ace)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Suiid
Iwlanune
applied
(Fidel)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
RaVA
tans
1000 als
tons
676
133
S I I
Ahavists-CP
5.00
5.00
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6130
148
0
0
Irrig.
148
88.18
0
440.91
0.00
676
B3
Sit
Altavista-C&
5.00
5.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
brig.
125
74.48
0
372-391
&00
676
,C2,L3
Sit
State-CP
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
01
Irrig.
175
104.27
0
1,105_5
0-00
676
I.C2.0.
SI 1
Staie.CP
10.60
10.60
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.18
0
637.89
0.00
676
Rl
SI I
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0
2,5.15-69
0.00
676
511 A
Sl1
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Wheat, Grain
35bu.
9/1-3/31
1 85
0
20
brig.
65
38-75
0
1,di4.70
0-00
67
RI
Sit
Sul.-CP
21.80
21.80
Soybeans, Manumd, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1415
1 175
0
0
irrig.
175
104.33
0
2.274,43
Q.tIO
676
R1B
Sit
State-CP
21.90
21.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.21
p
1,312.67
0.00
676
RIC
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16.10
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
170
0
0
Irrig.
170
101.35
0
1.631.75
0-00
676
RIC
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16.10
Wheat, Crain
55 bu.
9/1-3/31
106
0
20
brig.
86
51.27
0
825.47
(101)
676
R6A
Sit
C.onetoe
9.00
8.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
30 bu-
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
brig.
119
70.95
0
56756 1
0.00
676
R6Aj
Sit
Catctoc
8.00
9.00
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-3/31
93
0
20
brig.
73
43-52
0
3,48-17
QOO
676
itr',is
Sit
SLUtXP
14.00
14.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
Irrig.
175
104.33
0
1,460.64
0.00
67
$11
Statc.CP
14.00
14.00
Wheat. Grain
60 bar.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
brig,
101
60.21
0
943.00
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
19,684.68
Lagoon liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
t
Balance, 1000 galloru
-1,151.0
Total Applied, Gans
0.
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tracts
0.
Balance, tons
0.
Noetsr 1. lu the taxi cokum syrmbol - means leased, otherwise, owned.
...............................
Database Version 2.0
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
.. ... ............_..............-....-....._......---•- •...-.....-.....--...-...--.... •-------------- -----
Date Printed: 7/8/03 WUT P*v 2

YY-1- / _11_
V AM. M
'fact
"UJILA24.11011
Field
Sarre
I.D.
iaviv,
soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
Kcal
RYE I
A,
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen I
PA i
Nutrient
Regd
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manua
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(item)
Liquid
Manure
Apphai
(Field)
Solid
Needle
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gaVA
tons
1000 mats
Von$
2429
DI
Sl l
Altavista-CP
4.90
4.90
Cotton
850lbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
0
brig. 1
76
45.31
0
222,02
0.00
2428
Di
Sit
Altavi Q-CP
4,90
4.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/13/31
125
0
0
brig.
125
74.52
0
365.16
0.00
2429
D2
Sit
Cuoctoe
9.50
8.50
Cotten
700lbs.
3/15-7131
78
0
0
Irrig.
78
46.50
0
395-27
0.00
2429
D2
Sit
Cooeux
8.50
8.50
Wheat, Crain
40 bu.
9/1-3/31 .
93
0
0
(trig.
93
55.45
0
471 28
0.00
2428
D3
Sit
Swc CP
2.50
2.50
Cotton
875 lbs.
3/15-7/31
71
0
0
brig.
71
42.33
0
105.81-
0,00
2428
D3
Sit
SuwCP
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
121
0
0
trig.
121
72.14
0
190.35
O.00
676
BI
SI1
Altavista-CP
6.40
6.40
Cotton
850lbs.
3/15-7131
76
0
0
brig.
76
45.31
p
:!n.98
OAO
676
BI
sit
Altavisu-CP
6.40
6.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig.
1 125
74.52
0
47604
0.00
676
B2
Sit
Altovista-CP
2.70
2.70
Cotton
850 lbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
0
brig.
1 76
45.28
0
12226
O.00
676
E121
St l
Altavista-CP
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig,
1 125
74.48
O
201.09
a00
676
B3
Si l
ADavista-CP
5.00
5.00
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/15W30
148
0
0
brig.
1 148
88.18
0
440.91
0-Op
676
B3
Sit
Altavisla-CP
5.00
5.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
brig.
1 125
74.49
0
37239
0.00
676
IC2,01
sit
SWIG-CP
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1W15
I75
0
0
ltrig,
175
104.27
0
1.10515
OLOD
67
,C21C3
sit
S1219-CP
10.60
10.60
Wheat, Grain
60 bu,
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.18
0
637.89
0,00
67
RI
Sit
-rubtxo
42.70
42.70
Hybrid Bermudagrau Hay
4.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
200
0
0
brig.
200
119.24
0
5.09139
0.00
67
Rl
Sit
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0
1,272.95
0.0
676
RIB
Sit
State-CP
21.80
21.80
Hybrid Bennudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
289
0
0
Iff
289
172.30
0
3.756.06
0.00
676
RIB
Sit
Stott-CP
21.90
21.90
Small Grain Overaecd
1.0 Tans
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
29.81
0
649,84
0.00
676
RIC
Sit
RaooA&
16.10
16.10
Hybrid Barnudagrass Hay
3.5 Tons
311-9/30
152
0
0
Irrig,
152
90.ti2
0
1,45897
0.00
676
ald
Sl 1
Roarwke
16.10
16.10
Small Grain Overaecd
1.0 Tans
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0
479.93
0.01)
67
sit
Conao�c
8.00
8.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tans
3/1-9/30
269
0
0
brig.
269
160.37
0
1,182.98
&00
67
Sit
Cawtoc
8.00
8.00
Small Grain Overawed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig,
1 50
29.81
0
238.47
1 0.00
-------- ----- -----------------------------•---._.._..._......._...---._...._...-----....--•----•-••--•-•--..._.._...-...----•-...._...__..._....__.....----•-...._...-----.._..__..._..- --------- - - --- ---•--
i0% Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 WUT Page 3

Wnctp i Itiiiryatinn TahlP
Vpur'7
Nitrogen 1
Comm.
Rea-
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Rd.
(1bs1A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Wanum
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
AppkAd
Rcq'd I
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acne)
(Field)
(F-W)
Source
Total
Use.
Appiic.
Applic.
1000
Traa
Field
I .
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
Croo
RYE
Period
N
I N
N
Method
Ibs/A
I xal/A I
tons
1000 zals
was
676,
R6B
Sl 1
StaIc CP
14.00
14.00
Hybrid Banwdagass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
2891
01
0
Brig.
2941
172.30
0
2.412.15
0.00
676
SI I
State.CP
14.00
14.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig•
50
29.81
L 0
417.B
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
22,44&%
Lagoon liquids
Total Produced. 1000 gallons
IS,=
Balance, 1000 gallons
-3.913.7
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.
t3alance, toss
0.
Now: 1, in the tna column, ryrttbol — meanly leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol 0 means user entered data.
----•-----•---------------------••--------------------------------i ........................................... .....
WM Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 7/8/03 WUT Page 4

ilaet
Field
Sa+wt
CD,
Soil Series
Total
Aar
Use.
Acres
C
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Rea.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manua
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Fidel)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
VA
1000
toss
2428
Dl
Sit
Ahavista-CP
4.90
4.90
Soybeans, Manun d, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
176
0
0
brig.
176
104.93
0
514,15
0.00
2429
Di
Sit
Ahavista-CP
4.90
4.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
20
brig.
105
62.60
0
306.74
0.00
2428
D2
S I 1
conetoe
8.50
8.50
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
brig.
119
70,951
Q
603,04
0A0
2428
D2
Sit
Cmetoe
8.50
8.50
Wheat, Grain
40bu.
9/1-3/3)
93
4
20
brig.
73
43.52
Q
369.93
OAD
2428
D3
Sit
State-CP
2.50
I.50
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
lerig.
175
104.33
0
260.93
0.00
2428
0-4
IS 1
Slate-CP
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.21
0
150.54
O'm
676
al
Sit
Altavista-CP
6.40
6.40
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9115
176
0
0
Irrig.
176
104.93
0
671.54
0.00
676
B1
Sit
Ahavista-CP
6.40
6.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
Q
20
Irrig,
105
62.60
0
400.63
0.00
676
132
Sit
Ahavista-CP
2-70
2.70
Corn, Chain
130 bu.
2/I5-6/30
148
0
0
Irrig.
148
88-18
0
239-09
0.00
676
B2
Sl 1
Ahavista-CP
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
prig.
125
74.48
0
201.09
0.00
676
FLI
S I I
Altavista-CP
5.00
5.00
Corn, Grain
130bu.
2/15-WO
148
0
0
brig"
149
88-18
0
440.91
0.00
676
B3
Sit
Ah*vista-CP
500
5.00
What, Grin
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
brig
125
74.48
0
372,39
0-00
67
,CZ0
Sit
State-CP
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
Irrig.
175
104.27
0
1,105.25
0-00
676
,C2,C3
Sit
State-CP
10.60
I0.60
What, Grain
60 bu.
9/I-3/31
121
0
20
brig.
101
60.18
0
63729
Om
67
RI
Sit
Tarboro
42.70
42.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
25 bu.
4/1-0/15
100
0
0
brig.
100
59.62
0
2,545.69
0-00
676
RI
Sit
Twbtrto
42.70
42.70
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-3/31
85
0
20
Irrig,
65
39.75
s 0
1,654.70
0.00
676
R1B
Sit
State CP
21.90
21.80
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
0
0
brig,
I75
104.33
0
2,274.43
0.00
676
RIB
Sit
State-CP
21.80
2186
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-3/31
121
0
20
Irrig.
101
60.21
0
1,312.67
0.00
676
RIC
Sit
Rougske
16.10
16.I0
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
44 bu.
4/1-9/15
I70
0
0
brig.
170
101.35
0
1,631.75
O"00
676
RI
Sit
Roanoke
16.10
16.I0
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-3/3I
106
0
20
brig.
86
51.27
0
925.47
0.00
676
R
Sit
Conetoe
8-00
8.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
119
- 0
0
brig.
119
70.95
0
567.56
0.00
676
R6
Sit
Carfetoc
8.00
8.00
What, train
40 bu.
9/1-3/31
93
0
20
Brig.
73
43.52
0
348.17
OA0
................ .... - ... ....... - ....... ------------ ----------------------------• ----------------------------------------------- U -------------------
Databm Version 2.0 \� Date Printed. 7/8/03
WUT Page 5

i
i
I
Ttact
7
Field
5>5ratr
LD
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acre3
crov
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Msnnre
Applied
(wm)
Liquid
M= me
Applied
(Field)
Solid
mane e
Applied
(FF-Id)
N
N
N
IWA
1000
A
tons
10tri} cah
I tots
67
R
Sl 1
StataCP
14.00
14.00
Soybeans, Martyred, Full Sensors
45 bu.
4/1-9115
17S
0
0
brig
i7S
104.33
p
1A60 64
O p0
67
R
SI1
State-GT
14,00
14.00
Wheat, Grain
50bu.
911-3/3I
1�21
0
24
[Trig.
- 101
60.21
tli
AV
0
Total Applied, 1000 plioar7,09
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, IODOgallons2
Balance, 1000 gallons4.
Total Applied, tans
0
Manure Salida
TOW Produced, Lone
0.00
Balance, tan
O.M
N, cwm i . to the trsrt roIwnn, ."wdx l —weans leased, otherwise, o vned.
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
•
i
E
........................ Ir-------•----•-------...•................................................................................................... ............ ---------- ---•------
W" Dam vetsion 2.0 Date Printed: 718103 WUr Page 6

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate
varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that Mil not
rt suh in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field
selected to receive wastewater. it also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any
one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
2428
D1
Altavista-CP
0.50
0.96
2428
D2
Conetoe
0.60
0.72
2428
D3
Stam-CP
0.40
0.96
676
BI
Altavista-CP
0.50
0.96
676
B2
Alavista-CP
0.50
0.96
676
B3
Alavisa-CP
0.50
0.96
676
CI,C2,C3
Sate-CP
0.40
0.96
676
RIA
Tarboro
0.75
0.48
676
RIB
Sate-CP
0.40
0.96
676
RIC
Roanoke
0.35
1.00
676
R6A
Conetoe
0.60
0.72
676
R6B
Satz-cp
0.401
0.96
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-08.2003 IAF Page I of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each
source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out,
this material must be utilized for crap production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is
nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc -can also be Iimitine. Since nutrient levels are generally
very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and
lakes, phosphorous is a concern Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PAN Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minim m Acres
10 Years Accunnrlation
Minimum Acres
IS Years Accuaulation
Swine Farrow Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard '
Cam 120 bu
150
13.16
171.41
342.81
514.22
Hay 6 ton RY.E
300
26.32
85.70
17I.41
257.11
Soybean 40 bu
160
I4.04
160.69
321.39
482.08
........................................................................ .. .. ..
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the use and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or"bqual to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the structure's temporary storage capacity.
AvnilahlP Wacte Stnrave C;tnacity
Source Name
I Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Clacity CD&ys
Start Date
12/31
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
137
1
3
132
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
154
1
7
123
l
8
92
1
9
127
1
10
112
1
11
147
1
12
121
2
1
108
2
2
89
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
158
2
6
132
2
7
101
2
8
70
2
9
56
2
10
59
2
11
63
2 1
12
37
3
1
6
.. .. .......
386094 Database Version 10 Date Printed: 07-08-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 2

Source Name
Seine Farrow -Feeder La on Liquid
Desi nStora a Ca city ays
Sar
2/31
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
3
2
-15
3
3
-46
3
4
35
3
5
108
3
6
94
3
7
67
3
8
36
3
9
69
3
10
52
3
11
85
3
12
59
• Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-0$-2003 Capacity Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the,waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of manageinent, unless there are
regulations that restrict the. rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste wiH
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/8/03 Specification Page l

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
.................................
386094 Database Version 2.0 Dale Printed: 7/8/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainagewais,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, Vvaste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 718103 Specification Page 3

♦. i
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
......................................................................................._.............................. ......... ...............
386094 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 7/8/03 Specification Page 4

.)-( 1-) k I Z
(Type of Visit: 0 Com ce Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name, - —) Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: k7 pig 1 r g r✓ _ „ „
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current Design Current
]]try
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
s�
can to Finish Layer
DairyCow
can to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
DY$ Pvultr. Ca iaci P,o P.
Non -Da'
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili " Number: - Q Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No 'NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ; 7
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes E21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): rO i —5 , lg c;1;4 Ate'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No NA
[3 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
No - ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
'Co ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
KNo ❑ NA
[] NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfer ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: IZ76
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ld "0 NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge'? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge`? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [:]NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
[]NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or:uny other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as; necessary). ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/]nspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
J
Phone:
_• L
Date: 2 /& / / Z-
21412011

/Z-Y( t?
Type of Visit
omplian spection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
Routine Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other [I Denied Access
Date of Visit: /� Arrival Time: Departure Time: S County:
Farm Name: IT � � � � � �'� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: h �'�►^
Certified Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e ❑ 1 ❑ 4{ Longitude: ❑ ° = d = !{
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine C►apacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
I I
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
I❑ Non -Layer
I I
❑ Dairy Calf
El Feeder to Finish
El Dairy
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
El Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Heifer
Discharees &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any par[ of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Structure [I Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
El Yes VoEO
A ❑ NE
ElYes A ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes FNo gNA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes M< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
t I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind
Drift �❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 6�A,--- f' — --
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? El Yes 7❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VN
C'E] NA ❑ NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [I Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
� •, 6.Y (
Comments (refer,to que stio6'#) lEzpl'i """ YES.answers and/or.any`.recommenuations or any ot, co.mments. a
ffi 4 ; r:
Use;drawmgts of.facility:to betterpzplarn situations` (use;additional pagesnecessary):"r ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name K �� �:F� Phone: c ZW ti
Reviewer/inspector Signature: a- t,Date: i
17/7R/1!Q r'nnrin71011

Facility Number: j 3 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N- 'ol NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El maps El Other ,�,�
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If es check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
P g P yes,
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspectionseather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑
Yes ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �N�[EEINA ❑ NE
26. Did the facilit fail to have an actively certified operator in char e? ❑ Yes Ld N NA ❑ NE
Y g
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
t--�3 ? k ( kY -' k k.8, Y;4Y Y. .'..
Add�trona 6inineiiQ andlnrs Drawings ° ', / i
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

41q 1( 6
Type of Visit grCom ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �,) Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: S"t L Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: )1 'E' 1 t J�- J•�.�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = 5 Longitude: = ° = 6
Design
Current
Design Current
Design
Current
Swine
Capacity
Population
Wct Poultry C«apacity Population
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to.Finish
1
1E] Layer
❑ Dairy -Cow.
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer
I I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cowl I
T
Liurke s
Other
El Other
❑Turkey Poults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes :�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

5
f
Facility Number:33
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): T 41V
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No - NA El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA [I NE
Structure Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
l I . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0Yesj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 41 r � f L�r �"G� �C.�.�. 1;e_rn'nL',. CA C�—r- C4-1 n
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZFNo A D.NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ElYes No NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? El El
N N NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElYes o NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
:Comments (refer to questi6n:#) E'xplain'any Y>1S answers and/or any, recommendations or ansy other comments
jUse draivtngs.of fac�ltty to betterexplatn sifuattons. (use addtttontil pages asFnecessary) qqyy, 4„ Qp$g
�,3 1 i
T
t
Reviewer/Inspector Dame 't . 4 ° ' t1 'A ",, } 1§ ;"F Phone: _/J�j� V 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -2d7 �e Q- r Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continuer)

1
r
Facility Number.3 —b Date of Inspection ,
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP D Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain InspectionsVN�O
❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �_NA❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facilityfail to conduct a sludge survey as required b the pen -nit? ❑ Yes
�CDI ❑ NE
g Y q Y p
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge`? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional, Cornments and/or Drawings 'M MAk 04,kd � x
4
J
-
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number
;l
•Q Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Comp1' nspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: � z� Arrival Time:�" Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: dA0 h. i2 c t- I P Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: q2!1-- 1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
7
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
0
Latitude: E]
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
{ " = O = L = p
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Fa er
�i Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharses & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design` Current..."
Cattle Capacity : Population,:
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Dairy Heife3
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
E ,
Number of Structures:.
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes qNo[3NA
NE
El YesA El NE
ElYes ❑WE
i
4
12128104 Continued
f

r
i
r
Facility Number: 32
> —d
Date of Inspection Z7 d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No - NA El
El Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes El No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo I NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) tr l + �e,n-/R_JF , i�C • r-ch, J_A14 4f_0Y ►"I
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �N�oNA ❑ NE
16. Did the facili fail to secure and/or o erate er the irri ation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes NA NE
facility p P g ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
CommetanyYtps (r))efyye��tyyo��'{{queCs3tioii #} ��E plga�naCnsy YgEqSanswers r ndlorany: ec.,o}mmnd�aytions or any nther comet nts. � � '�� �
��Usedy,, yr'aw�ngs ,of!! fyyactplpity tobetter explain sttSu-»atsons: (us�e`Addittonal�pagyesyYa¢s nleces[sary}:
Reviewer/Inspector Name T � -- Phone: OIL
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

r
Facility Number: —Zj Date of Inspection Z7
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes�No[0:1
NA (3 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check [I Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspection;1--No
❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facilityfail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
g g
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes v No NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ElYes 0, No NA ElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesVNoZ
NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes
NA -❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additlonal Cor"ments and/or Drawmgs:J
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit �Routlne
e Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �-�--� --9--' Arrival Time: ' / D Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: __ � A,1-_ gn e Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: n 4,9'' "' ,-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Title Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 1 Longitude: = o = , = {1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capa�c1 Population Wet Poultry Capacity population Cattle C•ap�ity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
El Stocker
❑ Gilts El Non-Layers
ElBeef Feeder
El
❑ Boars El Pullets
Brood Cow
❑❑Beef
Turke s
Number of Structures:
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes j2rN�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
El Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

1
J Facility Number: i 3 — b
Date of Inspection 1 z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes jNo
No NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El YesNo NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes , �NoMA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [:1 Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or ] 0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(s) CC'D y Aa ,f M l (1 /Qi'(
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes —❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No CO NA ❑ NE
; s.� z:'.$Sa .�.!1Alt .:��
Comment(refEr to yucshon #}; Expla many YEAS, answers a'nator anyl,reco mend itions or any other comments
Use d��a,wntgs of facrlity to better �explatn sit�uat#ions. (useladdjtionaFpages as necessary
�!6a^e.,. ;rii6'ls. ,: Aev'.N Vr"
r,
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name f --- 1 Phone: 291 —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: a d `Dj,:-,- Date: � / 7-1
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: -- p Date of Inspection 2 0
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
NA
�NoFDI
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
0 <No[I NA
(I NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
L;dLJ'-NL'4o ElNA
[INE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�No NA
El NE
2'7.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
A'dditlonaLGomments and/or Drawinos , :; : m� yet: ,ay
C!xi £'S ax s!�A ::4'56 Ydf4=$aP.-
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number p
Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
q,(-7- 0 7
Type of Visit Com ante Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 6;jffj M e-- Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: n 1 /
cT)
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = , = Longitude: = ° 0 1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design,,,. :'.Current.
Cattle Capacity: Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2❑ Yes N ❑ NA E
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
El Yes o NA ❑NE
12128104 Continued

-1
Facility Number: —b Date of Inspection 1 �7
Waste Collection & Treatment
! 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes eNo A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes oFC1A ClNE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure ure 6
Identifier. 0 Z d
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): J << Zy �� _ Z C�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o A El NE
Oe/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed [IN Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes:No
No ❑ ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ClYesrIo
a A El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence ofWindDrifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C I'1 , J? �, 40-4
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
o NA ❑ NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
1W
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: ly 210a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 v— e-7 Date: b 102
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 —b Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other KO
ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Yes No NA El NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Comments and/or
❑ Yes ZINo ' NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes VONA
El NE
El Yes❑NE
❑YesEl NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

I _T]
facity' Number k p
Division of Water Quality, � ." ` '' (p�-•
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
L
f Visit �Com nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: — Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �,-= Operator Certification Number -
Back -up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e 0 ` = `1 Longitude: 0 ° "
Design
me ` Capacity.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
J. ❑ Other
CA m
;urrenf . Design Current
0 dation; Wet Poultry Capacity, Population Cattle
1LJ Non -Layer I
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
Cu
. , r of Structures" ;�'
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rNoO
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:B�b
Date of Inspection D�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No - NA ElNE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t, n tify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
p type(s) () C�(3 ,j ,
12. Crop e s S +yl � /' -A-, "It -5 . �r� u � � 2 �` •-- -
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �Cl NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ElYes;Z�
NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? []Yes
NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElEl NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: ? 12A -0
Page 2 of-3 12129104 C'onfinued

Facility Number: — r_> Date of Inspection 13N) Id
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain InspectioneNo
eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Cl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional'Comnients and/or Drawingsi :'
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit .PSCo lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: D Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: LA & 0:1 c— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
S_
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: =]' =] ' =" Longitude: = o = =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I :�:3
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharces & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
i
❑ Dairy Calf
�I
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Coy
Number of Structures: 0'
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo,,0NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�Zo❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [--].NA ElNE
❑ Yes7NoZ 6NA El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued /

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): LIZ L4 11
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 2 Zo
NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El NA ❑NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �`No❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes;NozDNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
r �
4 S I Fl ";1-1 A-C'71 1%
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
'- ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'[]
Yes
;7N El
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El❑
NA
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Reviewerllnspector Namett . Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: T 2. 61 Date: 7Z ( (ZQs-
12/28/04 Continued

Y
Y
Facility Number: 33 — p Date of Inspection 7 Ii
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ;No
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z�40❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No, NA ElNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ElN Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No [I NA ❑ NE
f
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
l
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ElYes A El NE
Other lssues
28 Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes:N00 ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or:Drawings.
12128104

IN
Type of Visit .4 Compli a Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for visit Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency !Notification O Other [] Denied Access
Faci ' Number Elate of Visit: E= Time: `Z=
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted CJ Certified [] Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ..041.11...... i% �....................................... .......•................ County:....................................................................................
Owner Name_ _____________________ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:................ Phone No:
...................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:..................................T....................................................................... Integrator:.. .(i ...................................................
Certified Operator: .... -a /i. `-............eS'...................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of farm:
❑ Swine [] Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 1 « Longitude • 4 «
Deg
:i.. lF, ,i
ux�rent E < , ; Ir I ,. est urreu , esMgn „ urrent
I d t ,, ,Ei� r eE „':ItE 4 r ,
,
` E 3
Iy>Ilsa,;i';�s,Ca aer
„P77,j�,I]Ej
❑ Wean to Feeder
3 ❑ Layer !; � ❑ Dai❑ ❑ N �:�,,on DairyFeeder
Non La erN❑
��EI�, fl
,i II E i
❑Other r, 4' ;#� 3 ; r ,E
�F �:, �E 3 i F i E r'i t r x s E,x z x- 3 iri iz :5 I iE
'i`II�S , Totai�Des�gn Capacaty,.i.
to Finish
Farr o Wean„
arrow to Feeder,{
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gifts
❑ Boars
7')r�' E Sri` T0113I. SSLW
-
��, li ,
"#.3xN-" �{ S�1_t.o:'1.....__ S.. _ ,;. il'.. �, .., .E ,�,. x�, �•. , #tih. �1 E� l- �.r ���i
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes . -No
❑ Yes 204
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o `
❑ Yes o
Structu 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches)
12112103
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
_. p1aII 0 i1 9 It S �r�)
�LL Continued

Facility Number: ?1� — a� Date of Inspection /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iee// trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes "
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes o
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes !N;o
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type h a
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 2<0
I4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 7" <0
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 7No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
,It.`i .3�?t"' ..Yri:<.E!:Sf7- .if, 7/hi:xls�'disN;".zir>. i3fM?".%;3N ., d°9f:'4'sE"'�a�E�iE.,lh;
;,Coniinents; refer:ta, ueshon�# iiEx latn'a�nYYES;ansvrerslandloran recriiimeadattonsorpanYtotiiercona�ments:
Ef h§ suV�lEti .(�ed�R:3£:4'¢i ;dh�:i4P6 f'F�2-.$s3�9' :!3 9p fx•, €..E :xi3dr6€€ueLaXea:i+_'JnIII(g:.:Aond:.R�
!=....?v: � ...g ! ?='-t{S. � .iFl;>at fr t-L, ,§€ht;,,,lf! ,Iif?R i „� s N dI 313i: P
gUse drriwings`of factLtyito`better�expla�n s�tiiiat.ons(use`addit�onal pagesEas ne�essaty): }t ❑Field Conti ❑Final Notes
i :S P"( } _.t�3 : ¢Ss ,°ff[Eer`.'.,.Ef _-§� i.. .r.o rJ E•`'t{,r � f
«. E1��fNi ...... ,��ftYN-:efP€€FGUPf6?€{IfNz �it;7, �ii 'xl�✓.IG�[x :., !:; .11� }:f€.'s.: l i t���i15:3:r:...,f}.k'iitl.t 6.i�.��P3 'a::9.. :.`��' ME ?{ �4�'. c..it.:'ifLL iL�ci�J:iif:i. ,RFC. ii iF :`6 �`4a3f f�}ir
L
7
.;1)•'9Fz�s:;leR` � S ..£`t, p � s1,� (, y ! t€Ei`�'. T
Reviewer/InspectorName ??� bll.,_[ €�: 7`$19r.r�% .d.l€i�4r„r?€..,�,ial;n.1,ter.ai..t€tl;,ilfC,i�a;at.<i,.Eh.;lt�41��:.:a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

cility%umber: —b Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
O'No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
;"�O
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑Yes
o
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El
No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El
"U
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
NPDES Permitted Facilities
XesOo
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Type of Visit 4 Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: v3 1'rime:
Fac' ' umber 10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: C:A J� 041
C County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certifled Operator:
Location of Farm:
`title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: �—y fz--
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 6 46 Longitude 0�66
Design Current
aw,ne "pacity ro utanon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Design Current ..Design Current
Poultry Capacitv Po ulation Cattle. :CapacitytyPo ulationv
❑ Layer I JE1 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I IEJ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
❑ Boars TotaT=SSLW �.
W ,
HtNumber of Lagoons ❑Subsurface -Dratns Presen❑ Lagoon Area 10
` Spray Field Area
oldrgPondsS©hdTiap❑ NoLi uid aMmensemste
s
r
Discharges & Stream lmnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection _& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: AW
Freeboard (inches): 66 r� OQ l
05103101
❑ Yes -�2 No
❑ Yes [3No Y
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ,�, o
El Yes (dNo
El Yes o
❑ Yes No
Structure b
Continued

Facility Number: ' —
Date of Inspection I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvcment?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 0404 n j
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes t; iv o •-
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
o
❑ Yes
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes _fnN
14. a) Does the facility sack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? El Yes Yes k�N
c) This facility is pcnded for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
Required Records & Documents �,�
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes jN
'
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes
19. Does record keeping need improvement? ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
P g P ( g Y P P)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cnmments,(refer to q tion#) �,Eplain any YES answers `and/or ariy recommendations oar any other comm"ents:'w
rUe drawings of face 'tobettec ex lainsituations.(useaddihonalpages asnecessary)'"
3.�•p ❑ Field Copy final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

s, y a
F tty Number Date of Visit: me:
Not O erational Blow Threshold
Permitted OCertified [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: / County: L�
Owner Name:. &✓"ram Phone No:
Mailing Address: Facility Contact: _ f2, e,Fyz, A Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �u L Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 10 « Longitude 0 4 44
Swine Capacity
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
a Number bf` agoous
Y"
Holding Ponds /,Soltd,TeapsP
Current Design Current
© ulation Poultry . Ca aci Po ulation Cattle
❑ La er I I airy
❑ Non -La er ❑Non-Dai
❑ Other I II
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ Subsurface Drain
�, 9 ❑ No Liquid Waste
Discharees & Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Designf '.,Curr"ent`
C apacity Population
n Area 1L1 SRrav Field Area
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure J, Structure 2 Structu 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): l 2 -7
05103101
Structure 5
❑ Yes jNooEl
o
El YesYes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or /
closure plan? El Yes uN
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes o
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? 1 ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes jNo
12. Crop type Mjer yA._-�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [TNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
b Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes iQ N
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
Reguired
Reegrils &Doc ment
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
;No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
,�
"No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Yes
Elid
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facili uire a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
El No
25.
any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
,�'��� r <. , �„�,., �
Comments {refer,totquestion #) Explam anyYvES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments: G,
Usie drarving's.af fac�tity to better explain;>.siluation&.(`use additional. pages;as"neccssary,) ,Y, Field Copy ❑Final Notes
❑
- ,.., L;
Reviewer/Inspector Name 4 f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
El Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 7
❑ Yes
05103101

N
0
Type of Visit , )a pli Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date: of Visit: Time: O b
Facility Number E� � �
'� Q Nat O erational Q Below Threshold
U Permitted O Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
.. County:
Farm Name: ��. LlL` �............................................................................................:
OwnerName:.........;1............... .. h cJ :.`.5. ........................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:................ ...................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ZEIntegrator:
Certified Operator:.. ..... ... .......... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location' of Farm:
V
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �' ��� Longitude �• �� ���
Design ' " Current Design Current Design' Cuitreat
Swine Ca aci Po ulation Poultry Capacity 1Po ulation Cattle Ca aci `Po ufation ! l
;J•
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non-Dairy;�r
❑ F to Wean
r1 I C &il.
i`t �R 1
arrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Tota16&!gn Capacity
l; ❑ Gilts Gri
❑ Boars Total SSLW €'€
Y
tuber of La o
8 ons j ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area TO —Spray Field Area } 1
E
EE Nu
HPonds / Solid: Traps: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream lmpacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes ,0'NO
❑ Yes 2-
❑ Yes ;�O�
❑ Yes o
ElYes To
❑ Yes L.�'r'10
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
2 /1 Lc/ 3( y C I/
Identifier: ....................... .................................................................... .....................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
Continued on back

FaciliNumber: — b Date of inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes eNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type /D.-h
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required_ Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: 1c? yiQl igris'oi• d�fciencies ry re note�7• �106ftg thisAsitl; Y'o ivjttI- eoiye Rio fhttbi r . .
:. ; irispoiidence: a*bout this :visit: ...::::.....:::.....:::.....:...... .
❑ Yes _rzwo
❑ Yes 0'No
❑ Yes O
❑ Yeo
s
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes LI 90
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ,B N '
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
El Yes o
❑ Yes la N
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes l o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 12
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
eviewer nspector ame H € ,. �,.rF , '. i 1z. �� Fe u. . } °,vl�tt .$ az¢€ i§' =f E,a� . €
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: 3 Q ( 5/00

Facil y Number: / — p Date of Inspection, U= Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Auc[itttonal uomments'ancuor.UraWin s
:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
To
❑ Yes
❑ YesEN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
5100

i•-ai3 i•
Yon€of Soil and�WaterConservatinnCnmplianceInspecEron r�r� P A
�. ,,,� n+n-• .'� x+• _...'� , 5 i 1 � Ft �S- € � � �€ pp 4 I Fk �i: a3 �.. r � r g, � a ,�
6 r VIS1nII of Water Quality ' COntpllt� F n J, t i iNix r s
-
Other Agency.- 4perahon Review, •, ; � <' � i kk
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Faci ' Number {j Date of Inspection ,,
Time of Inspection LL1.1 �f1J ?A hr. (hh:mm)
ermitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .':f.. �.....�............................... County:.. L ...5
Owner Name: �' Phone No Z5�'Z •- y
..�........ y........ .^......e-� . '' ...............................................I.... --:.1j�3 �6 ..................
Facility Contact: l.Zvi C /C �r/i.7f- .Title Phone No:........ ...........................................
MailingAddress: ...............�....................................................................................................................................../................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: „ f � e, /= w %................................................... Integrator:..../ rt�o d'--..........................................
........ ............
C jCertified Operator:...lz j..G:..........:.. r`w....r........................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: S�Z
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................... .......................................................... ........................................................................................................................... I......
Latitude 0 4 '' Longitude 0 4 64
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
S ructure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: (- lor't%' pY �+•—
Freeboard (inches): ...... 3.................................. .y..! I.. .....
...........J"...[.. r....................).2.1(.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Structure 6
❑ Yes ZNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 02 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? // ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type y0y !� i- r, G+�rT, ry%,— —,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20 Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
; 1Q yiQ1��iQ> s;ot def eie;ncies -*'re pOfRd- O(Wing phis;visits • Y.O.O.;wilt > eeeiye Oo futfte • •
corresp. oridence: ab4tf this visit:
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes 0^1�0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 21 o
❑ Yes ❑Zo
❑ Yes Zo
❑ Yes ,0 No
❑ Yes a o
❑ Yes No
O'les �❑ No
❑ Yes [�- -
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes FN
ElYes[EllYes
Q) 14-1 . I�((� j., rt,P� S J►' r'zr"', Lam+ fw rt �t rr (ilr.C,Gfli�7 %7
I^�w�s Sllll `� P-e C.rr . 1 v r� `� GJ Cr tJ-4 s w i
✓ice- iri i O 1 A)Wh v-' 'P'-+7 wq .t � J4 t,J14'ram! " :/ � O
ci- ov rG IIle 1 7 • C- 4/1,d /r. Gp 7^r 0- ied- dt11✓F.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: 3 —0 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes;NoZI
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes
+1

acility Number: — J Datc or inspection1.
•
Printed on: 4/24/2000
r'
•l .. ..Ia ip��s:ot= ;def cieflc e$ tv�re r... d i� .. . .. w .. . . . . .. .f �-th .
:corres Qndence ab.oirf this:visit: . • . • ' .. :... : '
i1.
Reviewer/Inspector Name"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date.

LAGOON FREE130ARD AND AV MABLE SJORA GECAPACITY
C U C # f} 1^, `, 7 •) - t'
Permit number:
Farm name:
Owner: S . `%
-A,'
D Fr so Ti-
Number of lagoons at facility:
Operator in Responsible Charge:
Certificate Number: / 7 .5_ t 9
If more than one lagoon at this facilty, please describe in words or -by drawing, which lagoon is identified as
lagoon number 1, lagoons number 2, etc, and note (asterik *) which lagoons, if any, have designed spillways.
3 ?O 1�No1-01
ODDZ 9 M Nn
�}k1j` IIrr ``11 I111I 1
C? () Record freeboard olus available storaee caaacity in feet_
Date
Lagoon #
Lagoon # Z
Lagoon #
L oon # La oon #
Lagoon # X
La Roon #
L oon #j
Initials
IS-
W
�M
.
2
3-2-S
?-
d�v
o
3
,{*. o , a• xF = ...
{<" -�paaik rk+`R x:
iF,:# 3., v- 5.a
"'�'d #� :' rriMS
.erg yFy 6 ,II
•'aA!`'M" v
1
-
??�1n
a¢
, s
d n.:;�`.ASaet^�^wn.
30
�b
:a;
, ,o- -..
tL i,. },y, z�
.b,: r a -s;!.':?'
'4 kP k 'y _,� r x.,k 3 'r.
� 1,`�� - FS+•
` �i'i
-3
J3'a 'F
..3t.:� �.:::a'�
•R --1Si: y, ],,�g3iri
# .�,Pk2.�4.,� w N� :fileit� .`I'.
zg
1-7
A73vba
1. Freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon
embankment and the level of liquid.
For lagoons with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should
be recorded.
2. Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly.
3/20/97

LA O FREEBOARD AND AVAILABLE STQRAQ9E CAPACITY G
7 - G n.
Permit number: Farm name: 0/- j1 0/y ,5 Z/A. C 3 3 - 8
Owner: W Etze, `/ 4 r J t- Number of lagoons at facility. 41
Operator in Responsible Charge:_ _'Cl( L <zc' �Z-p Certificate Number: / 7 t 9
If more than one lagoon at this facilty, please describe in words or -by drawing, which lagoon is identified as
lagoon number 1, lagoons number 2. etc, and note (asterik *) which lagoons, if any, have desi ed s illwa s.
f
qq
03 �v�1
U1,
100e)
Record freeboard plus avaUabie storage capacity in feet.
Date
Lagoon # 1
Lagoon
aoon # 3
L oon
La
Lagoon #
Lae2n
Lagoon
lni als
.-"
'Y Y'h?
; i
,'•'r fi
'14s`a
�l;�
%
� $'�'
> Li ff v3.
K. `�•� . r � 3. F 1.
^l 7����G
C'�t"�y+��.. ����
<
) , '' �$.4 ���
Y�'^�k��h�� Nf.',
����:Q"Z
&: .. :
r+
f
♦ J
J
i'..., i�`t
'�F.'. r�.. i-_',.3''?:
....:e �' +..F'.",:F
...afw„'"�t. vti '-�`<
`•iV. i'S' iY?i,+.
)�
uWiR'.y�hl
;�e.. 14k .aw.�..
3
,DyE ,1 S�Ty� �.^'
-R� +h 4 : '� %�
L 'L c,"y
id `Fxk.
S•-�-
i l'&�
5��yy i.P.y �i,�M;p�
i0i
f n
� 5
3
�.
3
6?
3, 5
3
y
3, �..
•.,„,�p
i ';',S♦" ,�
��7,,&& 'sr
� _,EC.' +i�7T' �5".i'+
�C ;�
�`;� $i .uA�i". ?4..k,.
�i"r' ^�.. x'.ei,^t.`k �
'A 'Y � s4�i•'� •.: `3
) �: iF'!�'�
3
-3
- `�"' a
%Y? S
- >• e 'i ?1 f
:day 6,g< ?.
�t �"r"t.
y 7� ,.°@;�
t '�"`
35 .-;C Y',3";-r
p�3 y� i»i""�iT "E:
..,F' .w3. "a�"
t'�, n. _
' . � ri7
�,qea ..�,�
'=a$ 11k
3
7Y}F 77
», F. i],n-{"��,
�`',�;i�Y i;Rtd2. �'V.,.L
...�Se�i.t'�`y♦� ��`Q
`.'a.,s�.,�`k l.�^iT �tlL
AUX��3¢'���
3, i
3
Z
3
I. Freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon
embankment and the level of liquid.
For Iagoons with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should
berecorded.
2. Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly.
3120197

ANDERSON, B. L. CAJ ONE
REVISED 4/03/00
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AW N PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID. N
ACRES
LBS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
676
6
AaA
COTTON
550
66
0
6.50
429
APR - SEP
676
8
AaA
COTTON
550
66
0
10.30
679.E
APR -SEP
676
11
TaB
COTTON
550
66
0
16.50
1089
APR -SEP
676
12
Ta6
COTTON
550
66
0
8.50
561
APR -SEP
676
13
StB
COTTON
750
90
0
7.20
648
APR - SEP
2428
2
AaA
COTTON
550
66
0
14.00
924
APR - SEP
2428
11
Ro
COTTON
450
54
0
10.50
567
APR -SEP
2428
3
TaB
COTTON
550
66
0
7.10
468.6
APR -SEP
2428
4
St6
COTTON
750
90
0
10.00
900
APR -SEP
2428
5
StB
COTTON
750
90
0
7.00
630
APR - SEP
2428
9
CeB
COTTON
550
66
0
21.00
1386
APR --SEP
2428
10
1 StB
COTTON
750
90
0
5.50
495
APR - SEP
2428
7
S1IB
COTTON
750
90
0
18.40
1656
APR -SEP;
2428
8
TaB
COTTON
550
66
0
1.00
66
APR - SEP
676
6
AaA
Wheat
55
132
0
6.50
858
OCT - MAR
676
8
AaA
Wheat
55
132
0
10.30
1359.6
OCT - MAR
676
11
TaB
Wheat
35
84
0
16.50
1386
OCT -MAR
676
12
TaB
Wheat
35
84
0
8.50
714
OCT -MAR
676
13
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
7.20
1036.8
OCT - MAR
2428
2
AaA
Wheat
55
132
0
14.00
1848
OCT --MAR
2428
11
Ro
Wheat
45
108
0
10.50
1134
OCT - MAR
2428
3
TaB
Wheat
35
84
0
7.10
596.4
OCT - MAR
2428
4
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
10.00
1440
OCT - MAR
2428
5
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
7.00
1008
OCT - MAR
2428
9
CeB
Wheat
35
84
0
21.00
1764
OCT - MAR
2428
10
StB
Wheal
60
144
0
5.50
792
OCT - MAR
2426
7
Wheat
60
144
0
18.40
2649.6
OCT -MAR
2428
8
HT'B
Wheat
35
84
0
1,00
84
OCT -MAR
143.50 27169.8
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
143.5
27169.80
TABLE2
0.00
TOTAL
143.6
27169.80
AVAILABLE N
249160.00
SURPLUS OR AEFlC1T
1
2209.90
Revised by: Date:
Facility Owner: Date:
Facility Manager: DA e:
'T-T
v6w 7.

ANDERSON, B. L. CAJ ONE
REVISED 4/03/00
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AW N PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID. N
ACRES
LBS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
676
6
AaA
Corn
120
150
0
6.50
975
APR -SEP
676
B
AaA
Corn
120
150
0
10.30
1545
APR - SEP
676
11
TaB
Corn
50
62.5
0
16.50
1031.25
APR - SEP
676
12
TaB
Corn
50
62.5
0
8.50
531.25
APR - SEP
676
13
StB
Corn
130
162.5
0
7.20
1170
APR - SEP
2428
2
AaA
Corn
120
150
0
14.00
2100
APR -SEP
2428
11
Ro
Corn
40
50
0
10.50
525
APR - SEP
2428
3
TaB
Corn
50
62.5
0
7.10
443.75
APR - SEP
2428
4
StB
Corn
130
162.5
0
10.00
1625
APR - SEP
2428
5
StB
Corn
130
162.5
0
7,00
1137.5
APR; SEP
2428
9
CeB
Corn
70
87.5
0
21.00
1837.5
APR - SEP
2428
10
StB
Corn
130
162.5
0
5.50
893.75
APR - SEP
2428
7
StB
Corn
130
162.5
0
18.40
2990
APR - SEP
2428
8
TaB
Corn
50
62.5
0
1.00
62.5
APR - SEP
676
6
AaA
Wheat
55
132
0
6.50
858
OCT -MAR
676
8
AaA
Wheat
55
132
0
10.30
1359.6
OCT -MAR
676
11
TaB
Wheat
35
84
0
16.50
1386
OCT - MAR
676
12
TaB
Wheat
35
84
0
8.50
714
OCT - MAR
676
13
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
7.20
1036.8
OCT - MAR
2428
2
AaA
Wheat
55
132
0
14.00
1848
OCT - MAR
2428
11
Ro
Wheat
45
108
0
10.50
1134
OCT - MAR
2428
3
TaB
Wheat
35
84
0
7.10
596.4
OCT -MAR
2428
4
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
10.00
1440
OCT - MAR
2428
5
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
7.00
1008
OCT - MAR
2428
9
CeB
Wheal 1
35
84
0
21.00
1764
OCT - MAR
2428
10
S(B
Wheat
60
1441
0
5.50
'792
OCT -MAR
2428
7
StB
Wheat
60
144
0
18.40
2649.6
OCT - MAR
2428
8
TaB
Wheat
35
841
0
1.00
84
OCT - MAR
143.50
33537,9
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
143.5
33537.90
TABLE2
0.00
TOTAL
143.6
33637.90
AVAILABLE N
24960.00
SURPLUS OR AE. ELGff
8677.90
Revised by:
Date:
Facility Owner:
Date:
Facility Manager:
Date:
1/' 4C?

ANDERSON, B. L. CAJ ONE
REVISED 4/03/00
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AW N PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID. N
ACRES
LEIS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
676
6
AaA
SB
45
180
0
6.50
1170
APR - SEP
676
8
AaA
SB
45
180
0
10.301
1854
APR - SEP
676
11
TaB
SB
20
80
0
16.50
1320
APR -SEP
676
12
TaB
SB
20
80
0
8.50
680
APR - SEP
676
13
StB
SB
45
180
0
7.20
1296
APR - SEP
2428
2
AaA
SB
45
180
0
14.00
2520
APR - SEP
2428
Ill
Ro
SB
40
160
0
10.50
1680
APR - SEP
2428
13
TaB
SB
20
80
0
7.101
568
APR - SEP
2428
4
StB
SB
45
180
0
10.00
1800
APR -SEP
2428
5
StB
SB
45
180
0
7.00
1260
APR - SEP
2428
9
CeB ,
SB
20
80
0
21.00
1680
APR - SEP
2428
10
StB
SB
45
180
0
5.50
990
APR -SEP
2428
7
StB
SB
45
180
0
18.40
3312
APR - SEP
2428
8
TaB
SB
20
80
0
1.00
80
APR - SEP
676
6
AaA
Wheat
55
132
20
6.50
728
OCT -MAR
676
8
AaA
Wheat
55
132
20
10.30
1153.6
OCT -MAR
676
11
TaB
Wheal
35
84
20
16.50
1056
OCT - MAR
676
12
TaB
Wheat
35
84
20
8.50
544
OCT - MAR
676
13
Sts
Wheat
60
144
20
7.20
892.8
OCT -MAR
2428
2
AaA
Wheat
55
132
20
14.00
1568
OCT - MAR
2428
11
Ro
Wheat
45
108
20
10.50
924
OCT - MAR
2428
3
TaB
Wheat
35
84
20
7.10
454.4
OCT - MAR
2428
4
StB
Wheat
60
144
20
10.00
1240
OCT - MAR
2428 15
5t6
Wheat
60
144
20
7.00
868
OCT - MAR
2428
9
CeB
Wheat
35
84
20
21.00
1344
OCT -MAR
2428
10
StB
Wheat
60
144
20
5.50
682
OCT - MAR
2428
7
StB
Wheat
60
144
20 1
18.40
2281.6
OCT -MAR
2428
8
TaB
Wheat
35
84
20
1.001
64
OCT -MAR
1 143.501 34010.4j
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
143.5
34010.40
TABLE2
0.00
TOTAL
143.6
34010.40
AVAILABLE N
24960.00
SURPLUS OR DEFICIT
9060.40
Any crop following soybeans, trust show a 20 pound reduction in nitrogen needed per acre.
Revised by: Date: J� a
Facility Owner: Date:
Facility Manager: j Date: (o

6/12/00
Kenneth Schuster
Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1628
Re: Caj One Farm
Rt. 2, Box 270
Tarboro, N.C. 27886
Dear Mr. Schuster,
In response to the Notice of Violation for Caj One COC AWS330008 dated June 2, 2000, attached are up-
to-date copies of weekly freeboard records for our swine waste structures. Weekly freeboard levels will be
diligently maintained to eliminate future recording lapses.
Our waste utilization plan has recently been amended to reflect effluent application windows for corn,
cotton, soybeans, and wheat by the Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation office. Copies are attached.
Please contact me if you have questions.
Sincerely,
g_Uj
R.W. Fulford, OI
(2S2) F 2 Y — 0 3 1 `f

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Berry Anderson Jr
Berry Anderson Farm
Rt 2 Box 215-C
Tarboro NC 27886
Dear Berry Anderson Jr:
4 •
NCP,-ENR an]
NORTH CnROLINA_ 6E RTMEi�T,OF�
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE:
December 30, 1999
1AA
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number,33:,8:�,
Edgecombe County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to Iand receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

M Division':of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
D,Division.bf Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
© Divrsion:'of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection ,
D.Other Agency -Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u of D%VQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSNVC review 0 Other
Facility Number,,- rt ..' r `..'ti Date of Inspection 3d
I Time of lnspection Z=24 hr. (hh:mm}
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .....c)47,.T... .! .-.................................................................................. County: i fir. .r- ?7��1..4............... .......................
Owner Name: Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilitvContact:..............1•itle:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing address:
Onsite Representative: ....
.tN. 4....... .............................................. Integrator: .......
i..1Q........................................
......
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude C'�� �•� Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer JE1 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer JCI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder �� v ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains PresentjjEl Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharptes & Stream Impacts
i
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ntan-made? ❑ Yes No
h. If discharge is observed, did it rcac h Water of the State? ([Yves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sv�tcm'? (lf ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway El Yes , �No
Structure I Structure 2 Siruyjure 3 Su uct re 4 Structure Structure 0ldcn1ificr: �A)wzj ^ � 1 Ruh4tY 20ZV`I�
Freeboard(inches): ....3..L�..................... !G......................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepabe, etc.)
3/23/99 Conlin"
nn back

e
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes [INo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? zrYes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? es ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes [INo
Waste Application J
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes JZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes [io
12. Crop type L ,) yl ,et_ 1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes/�_o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes >" 0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes/,?No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? . ❑ Yes INO
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes ❑ No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 10 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2(No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 9fNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes E3<No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? XYes ❑ No
Io•yi61'a(i6ris;oe.ilefeiendLe-W&L-poled'ciit•riitg01is:visiC Y:oij will f.ee*
0 .e o fuirther ;
••corresoric�eix�e.aboulrthis:visit...•.•.•..•.................-..•..• •.• ....•.•.•.. ......
.c 1-1—
ri - - i - r•^rtr -- - nr w.'^ a
Comments {refer�to question #} Explain'any YES answers and/or any'Tecommendations orlany other comments s ` �
1 w.
Usetldreawtngs of facal►ty to,better explain s3ttuations: (use additional pages as neeessaxy)„�
E Ev TO /3M F .v p iAIUP "AA. - LA)i 4)PO-J -S P- c t].�
61rt P A-t - G24- (N POW 4f �� f- -( 4()_ - © ` i P L1►1 P vU G %4 ,0 A0-�.J
UE ,O 7-o 'pr u6- W#t ; zz 6RC,P4't:-_ (2d►L 4AI -:ei6 Aoy`z w' fit,`„ za!J/Ay5
�7 6aVdkJA) 5Pr< etc., C•u2aP /0 Ira,6t-e-u R Qt),n Gla 1)IO4VT_
��a2� � ; ' S � (�- . � � �, � r-l-� � %iv+h /� �Pc�-ra=,o - r_�: s � rl�►9 ,v jo !h,% �L� R�,L�
)2,-arlwr m-rL pi✓�/L5/�.J /5Ei7nJ4�.cJ rr May-AG-aa,u� l��s 41R e_1jtAO
`S J
Reviewer/Inspector Name �� + F , : IT
Reviewer/Inspector Signature CGS,(., Date: ;;d G1
'3/?.3/nn

r
Facility Number: 1 Date of 111spection I ►�/xr)/`) ]J
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes WNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes ;!�No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 53"No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 1KNo
30. Were any major maintenance problerns with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or [
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes eNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 5,.No
3/23/99

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 2, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQLMSTED
Mr. Berry Lane Anderson
Route 2 Box 215 C
Tarboro; North Carolina 27886
Subject: Notice of Violation
CCajTFarm
COC-AWS330008:)
CEdgecombe-Caunty
Dear Mr. Anderson:
On May 4, 2000, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection of the subject swine operation. The purpose of this inspection is to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste management rules. As a result of
the inspection the following violation was found:
Your COC1General Permit requires that freeboard levels in your waste structures
be recorded on a weekly basis. Records show that the facility was behind by
several weeks.
Please note that the above referenced violation is a violation of your Certificate of
Coverage (COC) AWS330008 under General Permit AWG1000000 and as such may
be subject to civil penalties.
The Raleigh Regional Office would also like to recommend that you, your OIC, and
your technical specialist amend the current waste utilization plan (WUP) concerning
the application windows for corn. The current WUP states that animal waste can be
applied to corn from April thru October. Since most corn in eastern North Carolina is
harvested in late August -September or early October, these windows would allow
application of waste during times when corn would either be absent from the field or
unable to take up the nitrogen applied.
FrIZ57,
z o I o
1628 MAIL SERVICE 0ENT!R,'RALEIu H, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-1628
PNoNE919-571-4700 FA% 919-871-471H
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLE0/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Berry Lane Anderson
Caj 1 Farm
Page 2 .
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. If you have any
questions regarding this Notice, please call Buster Towel] at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
919/571-4700
File Access Record
SECTION
TIMEIDATE
NAME
REPRESENTING:
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the€;Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read carefully the following
guidelines before sinning the form:
1. We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Apaointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. an,d,3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision is available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-Ml2, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
FACILITY NAME
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Signat nd a of Firm/Business Date
Please attach a bwbieat cad b tlft lbrm
COUNTY
Time In Time Ouf

Revised January 22, ] 999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number 3,3 - b�
Farm Name: C-11 a, e--
On-Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:yz.le !/
Date of site visit: Z
Date of most recent WUP: 1 ZJ9
FOR MAN TORY WA DETERMINATION
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part Il eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 - E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficitJ645_ Z,1_ pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D�1]13 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part Ill).
PART II. 75% Ruie Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
171 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
s all, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Revised January 22, 1999
iciiity Number 3 f - 0 1
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
-0.J-
C�I�rVD!
/
0Z5
f
0, Sr
0, 5-
D D
3
?,
7•
o�
��D
l0• D
_,Z
9 0
3.3
, a
'd
7,
J�
7
(.
• a
o
f
4
1rr1
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant pull zone or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers
depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
I'A

tM Division of Soil and Water Conse'rvatior -Operation Review -
3 y
Dlvislon of W.rter d r Conservation
Inspection p�
liance Inspection ��
Qual t y'�- CCompliance
Other: Agency - Operation Review
10'Routine Q Com}Taint Q Follow• -up of DWQ inspection Q 1�olloNv-tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number b T� -� Date of Inspection jL
Time of, Inspection � Cy6 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CA ....... !.e ........... .... .. ... Counl. .............. ........ .0........... ........ I ..........
....
...... �-.
Owner Name:/1olicNo:....'..L.�...e.. S Z`. .�.z~�('R...........
Facilitv Contact: ... JZ�...L:Y.. h u .4...�~�................. 'I`itle:............... Phone No:
....... .......................
tIN'lailingAddress:...a ..Z.,.r3..o.,x ..................... ................. ... ...... ..7.�.'�......................................................... ..........................
44
Onsite Representative: ..... I C. �� Integrator: ......... K. . ...., .....A...�. ........................................
Certified Operator: 1(/) t✓K Operator Certification Number: .............................
'.............................................I.........................,....
Location of Farm: 5 !7 41 -3 D
........................... I ....................... t 'W
Latitude " 4 & Longitude 0 + °4
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder - ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 1E] Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Far to Wean
arrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field:Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Ficld ❑ Othcr
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance plan -made?
b. II'd ischarge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If dischat-e is observed. what is the estimated I'iow in galhilin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the Stile other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure sec#2-Sttrrue�re ds� Structure 5
I{lentifir e: SQ C 1 I r 1'. �' r
❑ Yes No
El Yes �too
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [ ICI
❑ Yes No
ElYes o
Structure 6
Freeboard {inches}:........l:P..�...............................................................................................
l ..........Z.y... �..............................4.1............... z..`�..I I
1/6/99 Continued on bl

Facility Num�er:33 Date of inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need taintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management systern other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top ol'dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑l Pon_ding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type ....
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Re wer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Xs facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
7�fn:violations :or. deficiencies .were noted: during :this visit. You w 11'retreive nay further...:
etirrespoiidence:066t; this Visit.:: . . . . : . . . . : ... : :: : . : :: . . ...: :
❑ Yes Jwu
Yes eNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o/
❑ Yes ii
�Zs
o
❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2<0
[:]Yes No
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
Comments'(referjo question #):.Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or..any other comments :,' ! o
y better explain situ pages }` Use.drawmgs'of faciht to b situations. {use additional a es as necessary):
A,
Reviewer/Inspector Name �45, '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: z�i 116

Routine
Facilitv Number
Follow-un of Did'
© Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit [j Permitted
FarmName:..4 !..L:.1.......9�&t� ................................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection a
Time of inspection hr. (hh:mm)
Not Operational Date Last Operated: .....
.............. County;...............................,.....................................................
OwnerName ....................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phonelw:.....................................
MailingAddress: .................�..k.......................................�............................................................r...................../.d................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ... L.........t� ...,L..............�U...... Integrator: ... IIt Z.....................................................
Certified Operator;................................................................................................ ......... Operator Certification Number;
Locution of Farm:
Latitude 006064 Longitude 0• ' 0«
Number ofLagoans / Hotdrrig Pondst � ubsurface Drains Present
'' ❑ No Liquid Waste Manages
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
[[[e ..��.apacayx:rupuia[[on ;
Dairy
Non -Dairy
SSLW I
Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Mid Area x
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes �o
El Yes YNo
❑ Yes o
❑ l Yes No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes ,EfNo
❑ Yes E!rNo
❑ Yes IffNo

i
� Faci ity Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed''
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure .Structure I structure4u,_,p Structure 5
Identifier: .... .....�.. j ........�................... ....r'�........................................
Freeboard (ft),
1.. :.. ................................................�...Q......... ....... .. ....3.0 ...
10. Is seepage observed from anv of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
NVaste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff
/ennttering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typed.) f i�.......`.....C�"-.r�..... ........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0• No* vitilationsor' deficiencies.were-noted duritag this" visit. .Y.ou;w'ill ireceive-iio•ftirther
correspondence Aboutthis;visit. ;
,;Lx Hft-6 X-t-fi T W/L O F ,
A lb /_- , 04_ 011k) / - lei
t�, H4--. .J1coe"
14 Irr L&A-Tff
❑ Yes glNo
❑ Yes ❑/
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XN0
'"Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ;U"No
❑ Yes ;dNo
/Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes epiNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes f 11
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes "No
/?-YPA/-I eV PE7Z &_Ve Tv ti�ZTE7PO 7-6 Pa
/� r-1E t0 6 �f S /
t �!< TVLAJO -k
K- �t-�O cow X"j—
le- T#IW
.Foy �aZ�t 11r- C-/ ,%C7_ n . i, JILI __. 94riWL04. 25�

Di ' '
n of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
ivision
of Water Quality
y
r
:
Routine O Cont o laint
O Follomi u of DV4 ins cvtion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection (.
Facility Number 1
r Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit' Permitted Not O eraticrnal Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 1',' /n a�sy,-.r o►� t a�............. County:... ''`` Lr.......................... ...............
OwnerName:..�1G!�ppi ..... e: Phone No: f 1...................................................................
Facility Contact:.l' C-16 i`k.e</�'" Title• ....... Phone No: ................................................... .......... .... ..... ...................
Mailing Address:....r'q'-:..boy- D....-v.� .�.�.t7.�r.... ............................... ............... .......
....
Onsite Representative:r`--�' Gem- f �f fir' S..". ......... Integrator: ..... 1�.. d..f rL...............................................................................................................
Certified Operator-_.... v..� aC � � l�`� � Operator Certification Number: .........................................
............................................................................
Location of Farm: VJi [, 2 `` y a
�.. ..................... .......... _ ..t-i
Latitude Longitude �• �� ��� ^
t•` 4 P~ Plat
apaci JT;%
... opu ion.,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ F to Wean
arrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
:n Capacity
Number Laggons 1 oldtng Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present Ll
❑ No Liquid Waste Managemet
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from,any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Area 10 Sprav Field Area
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes XJ N `
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑,Yes
❑ Yes ,
❑ Yes
❑ Yes rNo
❑ Yes N
El Yes No
Continued on back

Facility umbe r:
v
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Ifolding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Structure 2
Structure 3
Sfr cture 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .......�....................
f....:....................:�..�
z' r
.
.......
Freeboard (ft):
...
a
............ I ....................... ...... I ......................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers''
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15 Crop type %, Or,-1 '- /gln I
❑ Yes O'i1
1
❑ Yes P1<01
'Structure 6
.......................................
❑ Yes Nu
❑ Yes No
Cl Yes ,'o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0<0
...........................................................................................................................................................................�-�N
..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMII)? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment`? ^a► ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 4�1�0
I No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes
For Certified_ or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
24. Were a ditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Cl Yes
25. re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'! ❑ Yes No
No violations ox d'i'dende's were: noted during'this visit.- .You will receive no further
correspondence about this'visit
IGarttments (refer`to question`#): Explain any ES answers and/or anv recommendations or any other comments
iJs',drawtnt;s of facility to better explain situations (use acldittorial'pages as necessary)... F�
7/25/97

-2s"a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LTKMAI
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water {duality
,A
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E) E N F=1A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Berry L. Anderson Jr.
Berry Anderson Farm
Rt 2 Box 215-C
Tarboro NC 27886
April 28, 1997
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330009
Berry Anderson Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear Berry L. Anderson Jr.:
"r
In accordance with your application received on March 7, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No, 33-8, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance withithe State's General Permit (attached). This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including; but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Berry Anderson Farm Farm with an animal capacity of no greater than 4800
Farrow to Feeder and the application to 143.00 acres of land. The facility shall be located in Edgecombe
County with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP), and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring
data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production
greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number
authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed
prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.1OC, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components:
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite. Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
p ���
EAPR 0 1997
DEHNR RALEIi;H y
RFl: OKM llCr nr I"�
Sincerely,
Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Department
tRaleighRegional-0ffice, Water Quality Section
Edgecombe County 5of1 and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with `the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please .
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date: 3 S— 17 "
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have read the following list of requirements by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. '
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit -Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: D= Anderson Farm
2. Print Land Owner's name: Berry Anderson Jr
3. Land Owners Mailing address: Rt 2 Box'2l5_-C
City: Tarboro NC Zip:.27886 _ _ _—
Telephone Number: 92
4. County where farm is located: Edgecomt& _.
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the Iocation of the farm identi fngd): 2, 7 ►u , �,� rfk _ u f C 17
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): R • W • U L FO R
7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): _USDA.-LCS _ MAN-0„iZ
N
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 1 of 3 .

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: _12-$
2. Operation Description: Swine opgWin
Farrow to Feeder
4800 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? ryes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tyne of Swine No. of Animals 1= of Poultry No. of Animals Tvne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type Livestock `ou the farui: No. of AnimalsL
3. Acreage cleared and available for appIi Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMPJ: T 3
4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: 5"6 `�,r S Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES or ENO-
(please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or(please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, tR� Izg y 4-1 _ Aw n IF9 Se N r x R - _ (Land Owner's name listed in question II.2), attest that
this application for CA Jr © IV, —,--IV C � ��s� y �yA£rsr�! FA &#1,1
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete toithe best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if ' ed supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned-ta- ne as incomnle
V . MANAG
I, r<-
CERTIFICATI
L
Date 3 r S' q I
: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question I1.6), attest that this
application for C A- - 4 N E, = NC Z _13 8a r Z , 2s& g—rase /V js�
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complle(a to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be retu a complete. Q
Signature Date ') — -r l 7
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2/97)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301 .
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufoil J:;nes
Berne '
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin-
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lae
Wilson
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabanas
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Ire4ell'
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 3 of 3

t
Producer: ��� rr �n:�;,ra�:��, [? A 'T ON C
Location:
Address:
rry� ord,N�• Z7b"�`,
Telephone: 8-- 3—;�R,6ja_ 1
Type Operation:
Number of Animal Units: 20C,40
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged
so that all plant nutrients can be balanced far realistic yields of
the crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to s
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always'
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the;
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year.
Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface
waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior
to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements
may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
Amount of waste produced per year
S 0C / 9/ l
2ya o animal units X 3S / d waste/animal unit/year
ov waste/year r j v� 3 SS'lvn9 �,..
Amount of Nitrogen produced uer year
S 7 cc) d,,vV
173415.�.�
1 y co animal units X S 1bs N/animal unit/year = J
6 00 lbs. N/year j 3,36 16s J "at,
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
7� JC.¢�{A�L�t�•1 �',( 2. � /� CLa. r��.t�( .- ��lT �Q.�.�i.L .��.Csr�Nt-. �/,�1f-'.c^'[�'�Gy
page 1

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
.#' Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
3
,9Q
Nam-✓
3 80
.s
1356
iv
Ce,C3
s.s
Q75
75
-zo6-a
w=3
7a e
-tv
� .3 �
1�T,C3
� 51- Ca
143)
3,s
s s
/ 7.3 '
Total Table 1 I 48.5 1 /a804 I
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
Tract Field Soil- Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
�4a8'
a
Ta B
t3Qrry
a�5
176
3�960
Total Table 2 /7. i�
Total Table 1 48, 5
Total �,, f
Amount of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
3 94' 0
page 2

The producer shall be responsible for covering all dry waste either
by roof, tarp, or plastic from the time it leaves the poultry house
until it is land applied.
Where owners of animal operations do not have adequate amounts of
land to apply the waste, the producer must provide a written
agreement whereby another landowner has agreed to land apply or
allow land application on his or her land. ,
Call the Soil Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation
District office after you receive the waste analysis report to
obtain the amount per acre to apply and the application rate prior
to applying the waste.
operation:Narrative of r
ate• fL _■ A w A A ■A f • R w bkLr
WASTE _MANAGEMENT_PLAN AGREEMENT
I agree to carry out this waste management plan
terms of the agreement.- Failure to comply with
plan will automatically require any cost share
to their so ce.
Producer: PSE3``l , G4
according to the
the waste management
funds to be refunded
Date: (2� (-I;
I understand that Mr./Mrs, does not have
ample land to apply the animal waste produced from his/her animal
operation. I have agreed to utilize the waste produced from the
operation and agree to carry out this waste management plan on land
that I own or operate.
Recipient Landowner: Date:
system Designer: �� , , ��_ � Date: / Z ' z 93
SWCD Representative:
Design Approval:
Date:
Date:
page 3

SCS AREA-4
LAGOON SUMMARY SHEET & TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
2L
I Top Width I
S'r:_7. pt F l ed to of dams 5 2 D Imo_ 1 2 7 52, 5 Construct top of dam
Dent
Suppor
2+�
E+attpm .O
Fill Yardage ist Stage:.11, 2q5
1 !�j Fill. Yardage 2nd Stage:
2, .30
bud -side
Natural �grcrund el ev, U%. D _- -__ _---
ut aW-
"c -a depth determind by
SCS on site
e,7h're sajLce alai Ac� be
s�r►d 4-;4 --/Op 00 ;aches.
Pipe type & size:_ PU 12
Invert elev. y4,7 Start land. application
Treatment Volume
a f0 z 5,3 3 3 Qu. t+
A10.
Sl udc�e
FIRST STAGE
Size first stage: 'Length d
Size second Stage: Length Y-.9
2,5
I �
Temporary Volumes
.2— 1p94;393 ta.<< + 2-
Stop land
application elev.45.k
Bottom elev o4 � � (sassgnal high
water level)
* �45oa, bore,,,', ezru wW,* �
SECOND STAGE
Width 2 5 Cu. Yds. excavated !41 ¢53
Width 5 O Ci.t. Yds. excavated 3 ¢.35
F��Rt NCHMADESCRIrood t
ION* 6 i" O O e-n1
_ EIeyc,.-,,ova 46,K, *# I 90.40 ., — .Elevation: tbms�-z L44 64
GENERAL. INFORMATION
JOB CLASS:
HAZARD CLASS: 6-
ANIMAL TYPE &' NUMBER: 0
KIND OF OPERATION: FG+#c w'io feeder pevd,. Q
NOTE: If construction is not
started within one..year, this
plan is not valid until 're-
evaluation of flood plain Tor
sa•fety hazard is made.
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL. WASTE
�1
( TWO STAGE) 5",'�c 1 �
$err�i An'dey.-rd MFdf _ FARM
�COUNTY
AYAV/A Ca vo C�'w � STATE
U. S. DEPARTMENT
CONSERVATIIONASERVICEUF`� SOIL 11
DESIGNED DY: ��iG�1�,'l�-lr✓, I//Ii�. ..-
APPROVED BY:
TITLE:
DATE:

Producer:
Location: i- t �� 0
Address:
Telephone: y z 3- y_ u? P
Type operation: F4 A,.,,,..v �o lj t? u I " ti
Number of Animal Units: 1 yO v gy _,j-j
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged
so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crops to be grown.-7+
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilizMtionJ"
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and,to; Y-','
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always;'
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the ��-�,r.
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen tha=the-:�
crop can utilize. soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be CO
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year.
Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface
waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior
to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements
may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
Amount of waste produced Rer year
2 y animal units X 3' D 3 ti o,/ waste/animal unit/year
2 gp,„ waste/year
Amount of Nitrogen Rroduced per year
animal units X S-, �/ _ lbs N/animal unit/year =
_/21 7XI p lbs. N/year X ,fo lr, ZI-0- a.4i1-. ,,I r0� s %Y
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
�' %Gv�. �+-��-c.�rn ft�ts•'c�r�-�i� „� � � c ;..�.....ctc�.+� .2�� cJ�t � �/�/ T,�'
page 1

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month of
J-
Type
Per Ac.
Utilized
Application
66
S
3av
L.
S i d
A0
`p
1
J L } {i
'
;,��
y 7
y 10
-Sc
8
3ov
20,
16 1 �' v
A of' I - S
Total Table 1 37, 9
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# , Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
Total Table 2
Total Table 1 3 '7. a'
Total 7.
Amount of N Produced
Surplus OrCef ici.t
j i 3 y D
it, 314 0
9 -72
page 2

The producer shall be responsible for covering all dry waste either
by roof, tarp, or plastic from the time it leaves the poultry house
until it is land applied.
Where owners of animal operations do not have adequate amounts of
land to apply the waste, the producer must provide a written
agreement whereby another landowner has agreed to land apply or
allow land application on his or her land.
Call the Soil Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation
District office after you receive the waste analysis report to
obtain the amount per acre to apply and the application rate prior
to applying the waste.
r
Narrative of Operation:
ey2 yF r'r� ��r �'i` �xCc�c^� .r_ 6
- i
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
I agree to carry out this waste management plan according to the
terms of the agreement. Failure to comply with the waste management
plan will automatically require any cost share funds to be refunded
to their source.
Producer: r Date: Z- o3
r
I understand that Mr./Mrs. does not have
ample land to apply the animal waste produced from his/her animal
operation. I have agreed to utilize the waste produced from the
operation and agree to carry out this waste management plan on land
that I own or operate.
Recipient Landowner: Date:
� �1 Z-21-%
System Designer: L,(_� . 12.C.ck Date: / 3
SWCD Representative:
Design Approval:
Date:
Date.
age 3 2 L%- �6

Pi
1! tog I -,�,AjYQ A
f
ve
.
4w
t4
bi
Ar
PT
i
k
%Jk
P
m 0

LAGOON SUMMARY SHEET & TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
Tap Width 1
C ')
suttl ed top of dam:
i
SCS AREA-4
=- Can::truct top of dram
Fill Yardage 16t.Stage:
Fill Yardage 2nd Stage:
Y6 rd4 t �1 6 n ;
r ,n t ; ri �. •
z NAtural
_grnund -elev.=
cut seal _ Depth determi'nd by
-/�_ SCS can site
W } y r� p q n r �— ^--� En frr� .Sur -Ace area s'71r-rAa :
O; '- ,,cp 2"00' A 0 ,.
Pipe type & s ze:
rode �"
I2.."pvC.o Invert eleV. s�
Sent '
Suppar
/*�� 41
Bottom
Size first
It sizze
Treatment Volume
IL45ac! 02,7Gv.t
elev. ---------------
\ Sludge
Start land application
I r 41O Temporary Volume �e !
•5 roW 5... ,�,...r
` Stop land
R
S-1vraapplication elev4-5:
FIRST STAGE -
stag . -Length d 11 5
GENERAL. INFORMATION
JOB CLASS:
HAZARD CLASS: G-
ANIMAL TYPE & NUMBER: 2 '� D 6 5o 0 S
KIND OF OPERATION: r,s v �,nc•' i n L. fir. i, r';,
NOTE: if construction is not
started within anca. year, thi :s
plan; is not valid until 're-
evaluation of flood pl;:ii:n for
safelty hazard is made.
Bottom elev. 4-5­(a %seaspnal high
- ' �/st�abn 6otfcm w.I/ be water level)
Gx ca �a fed f� rlp�. ¢�, o -fo o6tQ;h
SECQND STAGE
i
Wi dth 9 Cu. Yds. excavated 7�02- 4
Width 5_0q- Cta.Yds.
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL_ WASTE
(TWO STAGE)
FARM
e. COUNTY
cc. 7 ,77i ., STATE
U. S. DEPARTMEN'r OF AGRICULTURE
.SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
DESIGNED BY -
APPROVED BY • LJ
T I''TL_E :
DATE: _---___--_.-_--___-__.______

C , Yrr $ r A- I- J
11k41Y
'�ti / n ilrailA,1 \
091'L9 NoavindOd'00 HSYN
S90'% do,; D9 3911033903 Y wa
all
010
nmq r \ `_i 013Nid .r42• r. + nn a.. L i.�' r C
!,rw; + U{ qN Rranl +� Y69Li rrp I sr
..., C1 ,., r rRnYr 3o�r��7i a
/- 6181Z B rrJrav \p.. ` j�." °,N„ 'yfll •� .r-�a MPOR
flop
% 3013N0� narl JJ p sM r, J(
IbW;
s n `
•.7 _ .—�.Ar +" it I rnrlH °Il
xrr \ 'Yr {r{ai{in0 •:/: rav,-M nf.
1 r piwuar rJ a ra a.L „
nn¢SNffm°Yo
I /rl• _ ry rn/rn •h hr. .ram �� , � � ��,�oian.n4,'�lus iw�n, rF r i 13'Jrrr
�. , ..�er c^ s 'arr7lrrp I
/ to,M OM \ - rao, - a, , a . #�+ of th
\ i fnal o ~ kJJkrpr u.ulop r' �+ r `s� 6 sou 1 14 J1� rr,l.
31rr
r- W• - ,x, C �' � r+1• N, -- r'r�_ .p p!�__� rI1 11,1 rrn`';
nW1 /IIp d r v+ cm,.Q
Z iY n7n IA30N1Hd.r r o I 1 .�n +r 35�++errr �N f'rGZiR I waY3k,
Ofa�r lJrt �-��I R ;,i •!�� f zOr wrJ YWJpr{ Jr,r r � rr.• ..
f!g �� p �a ar'� a�° 'f�+ - n., x a°u a t.3:": �i �4^�� r Kn•�r � _.�1� i .-�_`,`I
I hh I '•;tir•oilIr ytU., smrrr� .lr'• �, h tf��Rkk .
• -ran 'rY
� ur `-- �.. � /�' _ 9�R4 1 J❑� p �7 ear, // N� N Y9 rn o I Y
Y JAJ pr 1` r1i df `'� Si�fa'` �41 Aerrf.Im yaF
.i. 'ir \ r 6d .CI• {� r q 4 ! _ -:.�i '4 f $Y a of,
Z,
/�, �r� �•, \ v, r v+ n e rsrfslwfH •�J s rpa
rarpf
\ - \ ^r+`" t M it ,r�\sS \ ,yr i _• •- '� � a °j.
frqun0�� xJr�
i ..r
Juf1QW °''
dr `'•� wlun� n«,i' rr,'ml xf •� ,,,/ Ral n J +•p+;}+"' i'�� g _ r'l�]" a�
.er�l' i� r _ J r •fl°�++ � I`./. � ll39931 :S r-' +,
d ;, 1 �1'a•II i i ' ' S 7rapYrrM '; e
�, •• I ) 'qy �e���. r0� °i� `i1. � hh , ,� ie. .f 'I riJr.y'2 ; � J:,
rill 16 o n� ur,-"�a pm' Y'p.JJ!!+''
co
r } e� oY ,OOJrr ,'rrR 1/ \ i,.I Y,M3M1iS ��.
no 0
38
ID rn, 31 fJ a., 1• : [• �'ha �r � • gar
• I ..--. � � R71'
•, I �.. N NSA �`/ I
� C iLr1r+N{1 rM1. n. M ��gwnrw: .naary ar x° } 7/
1,11. i [J
L
._....
ar /_' . • 'ter--.
'�� r 1 •�'W'� � 1 pr xarnp°.,. "'" Pf" •rn�r��+� �•� I lj ' /r _
711,
l _ prw '-VJill
'-� .�,;'�'•"� �`;etilr o sr3xr11i1M
V.
+
Y'y*1+'lam rW 1.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Mr. BeAnderson
Rte. 2 Ix 215-C
Tarboro, NC 27886
146ja
[DIEHNFR
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 13, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation for
Cajone Farm
Facility No. 33-8
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Anderson,
On April 28, an Operation Review was conducted of Cajone Farm, facility no. 35-8. This Review
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.100, was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was o being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal were properly maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is enclosed for your
information. The following items were discovered and noted for corrective action or response:
1. Eroded areas on sides of lagoons 1, 3 and 4. These areas need to be seeded to establish
vegetation to eliminate erosion.
2. Two areas of severe erosion are present on the berm between lagoon 1(primary) and lagoon
2(secondary). This problem needs to be addressed before the erosion results in the combination of the
two lagoons. This would result in higher levels of nitrogen in the irrigation water from the lagoon and
compromise the integrity of the lagoon design.
3. The waste plan needs to be amended to reflect current land use and crops.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 9191571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concems or need
additional information. `
Sincerely,
�� : 6 07e�
Margar'e 'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
John College, Hanor Farms
Judy Garret, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Ate' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NLf C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 24, 1997.
Mr. John College
Route 2, Box 215C
Tarboro, North Carolina 27886
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 33-08
Caj One Farm
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. College:
On March 17 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that operations
are proceeding according to your approved Animal Waste Management
Plan. As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be
in compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an,
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your
cooperation and compliance. If you have any questions regarding
this inspection please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerelw �
Gnu"
y Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Edgecomb County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
Mr. Steve Bennett, Regional Coordinator, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, * FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%q fC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 __ 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

O DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
3
�jabWQ AnImal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine 0 Complaint 0 State employee call 0 Fallow -up of DWQ inspection U Follow-up of DSWC review ,
Date of Inspection 7-
FacWty Number Time of inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Stalls: -;. ,r i;" '` _. _ r ..—._—._ Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe%iew
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: County:G.._1l
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address ,.L�._.�- 6o Ic 2 fS C 7, or lZ...—..!'l/C�� 7���....�»._..._...._.._.. �..—». _...
Onsite representative:.:.. 04,1( _� r r'y" _ ____ Integrator:®
Certified Operator E`L- j-...._.......�»._.._..._._....�.....w......_»....._._.._......w........—. .__.....-
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude •' �u
NotOperational Date Last Operated: »......».. ....._ . ...._.. _. _»... _.. »., ....._. ..— »..—..... »... »_ .... ...� ..».__.... _
Type or operation and Design Capacity
E Swine. E �� �` k ;; ,.Number'•
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
F w t Wean
w to Feeder
Ll h 0 v
01 arrow to finish
;Poultry
Number
;Cattle Number
10 Lzyer
10 Dairy
I
NOnd� er
10 Beef
❑ Other Type of Livestockh
Nitmber:oi Lagoons / Holding Pondu 0 Subsurface Drains Present
a La oon Area Q S rav .Field Area
oeral
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement? ❑ Yes KNO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yesr/No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes PN/;,-
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ' ❑ Yes4. 'Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No

6. llfac&ynot in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes ins, �o�
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes iQ rro
Structures a oohs and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): La oon If, Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 r
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? r _ ❑ Yes 011C
11. Is a sior6 or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Cyi,. e X AI"A. 5Pp ffYes ❑ No
h U a r DPars f'v� Us' � i..K}r e O /� �oi�6/Q.,.,,+ ,9s•-'�l..,/l �YY�
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ff z
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Apnlicatlon
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.'1
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes la'No
❑ Yes a?' O
❑ Yes rN_o_�
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes �o�
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;Na
Comments (refer to question 0): Explain any,:.YE5 answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawhw. of facility to be" explain situations: fuse additional 'pages as; necessary)
.5Mn11 Spa+ j A,- o_ -A- a--_ 27-Os, LPI- t-�,nS a tol. 4
ReviewerllnspectorNrme
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Ouality. Water Ouality Section. Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Berry Anderson Jr
Berry Anderson Farm
Rt 2 Box 215-C
Tarboro NC 27886
M?WA
IT 0
A&4 a
9M ���
1:�EHNFR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Berry Anderson Farm
Facility ID#: 33-8
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Anderson Jr:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
A.O. Box 27687, 1W�
Raleigh, North Carolina 27671-7687 ��C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 ! 50/6 recycled/100/o post -consumer paper

n
7-13-95
Shane McCarthy CAJ ONE, nc., R,,, „ „iG;DNALOFFICE
Division of Environmental Management Rt. 2, B_70---
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 Tarboro," N.C. 27886
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Dear Shane,
It was a pleasure to meet you on July 13, 1995 when you visited
CAJ ONE, Inc. with John College and we talked at the end of our
driveway next to the mailbox.
I know you have looked at a number of units recently and they're
probably starting to run together in your mind. We're the new
4800 sow farrow to feeder pig unit located north of Leggett in
Edgecombe Co. owned by Berry L. Anderson, Jr. and contract
producing for the HANOR Co. of Rocky Mount.
Enclosed is our manure management plan developed by Mr. A.B.
Whitley, of the Edgecombe Co. Soil Conservation Service. Mr.
Whitley has been closely involved with this project since its
inception and has personally inspected and certified each step of
our waste management system from initial design to land
application. He has responded promptly to our questions and has
been an invaluable source of information and advice.
As I mentioned to you we've not begun land application yet since
we're in a start-up phase. We are installing lagoon markers this
week to monitor start--pump/stop-pump levels. Our center pivot
irrigation system is scheduled to be functional by mid -September
and pumping to begin in October after harvesting the current row
crop. A forage crop will be established for fall nutrient
utilization with a permanent forage crop planted in March, 1996.
An intensive cattle grazing plan is under development with the
help of Mr. Ralph Blalock, Edgecombe Co. Extension Livestock
Specialist and will be in effect spring of '96. Land application
will be closely monitored and recorded with keen awareness of
rates, timing, neighbors, and environmental considerations.
Thanks for your last visit
time. If we can assist in
information please call me
Sincerely,
R.W. Fulford
and you are more than welcome any
answering questions or need other
at [phone].

!'.1_ C)C�l;lC;er: �Gr �/ 4LI r.i t?t/_SGlvr /'�
Location: !Cf i- . r} ��L ��•� r �� ?" f
i�,ddr ess :
Telephone: �'_Z.� ' `�_6 E f '"
Type operation:
IILr.m��er of animal Units: 2yo v
`.L'he: waste from your animal facility -must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to redi.icc the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged
so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it, is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have: different
infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be
applied tb land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year.
Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface
waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior
to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor. problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements
may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
Amount of waste produced per year,
animal units X :3 2U 3 ;U / waste/animal unit/year. =
Tyc,�lswaste/year
Amount of Nitrogen produced per year
animal units X lbs N/animal unit/year
lbs. N/year X
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner. .
♦!; / I�'i. r~'vr. F•.c-et-t-r,-e..l.-! r p � �, ,� � �� ti.:�y+-.t�lr_s,-... ?�� r?�. f .Z / .,��/ �% �
J G f
page ].

r
h
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
'.h.ecrop to grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil. Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
4 '.hype Per Ac. Utilized Application
-5
3o.0
�7
�, /
5 1 D
,1
Z
2 6
Total Table 1 13 7. 9 1 I 1 3 L] y
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# , Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
I
Total Table 2
Total Table 1 3 '7
Total
Amount of N Produced
Surplus 01Deficit
3 U C
0/ -7 2-
page 2

,r -, ;, producer shall. be responsible for covei ing all. dry waste either
by roof, tarp, or plastic from the time it leaves the poultry house
unt:,.l it is land applied.
Where owners of animal operations do not have adequate amounts of
:Land to apply the waste, the producer must provide a written
agreement whereby another landowner has agreed to land apply or
allow land application on his or her land. ,
Nall the Soil Conservation Service or Soil_ and Water Conservation
Ij.�;'Crict office after ,you receive the waste analysis report to
obtain the amount per acre to apply and the application rate prior
'La �Lpplying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
I agree to carry out this waste management plan according to the
terms of the agreement. Failure to comply with the waste management
plan will automatically require any cost share funds to be refunded
�-,o their. source.
Producer: 41 Date:
I understand that Mr./Mrs. does not have
ample land to apply the animal waste produced from his/her animal.
operation. T have agreed to utilize the waste produced from the
operation and agree to carry out this waste management plan on land
that. 1 own or operate.
Recipient Landowni�r : Date:
System Designer: [�� .t,Lc - j3
`2'- Date: ��- < 1
SWCD Representative:
Design Approval:
page 3
Date:
Date:

Tom
Toys"

L'.X L(�-,n :.ior1 Service
{
Agri -Waste Management
f�1:o_ ocfioa l and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina Uni ve.rsi Lv
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker
1:. w;Az,il.'LE COLLECTION
A. Semi. -Solid Lod. Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of
manure from different locations using nonmetallic
collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface
crust avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic
collectors.
D. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both
ends into manure to pit floor.
b. seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a
thumb over end of conduit) trapping manure that
has entered lower end, remove and empty slurry
into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
C. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at
:Least I quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample
container.
ii.. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid
manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator,
b. Take subsample from about 5 pit locations, from
agitator pump or from manure spreader and place in a
plastic bucket.
"I'Trf.essor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural.
Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

Attachment B
Page 2 of 3
c. Mi.y Find add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
c,'. Lagoon Liquid,
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow
pipe to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
i.i . From Lacjoon
f a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of
10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
C. Srush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle with 11 of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times
around lagoon, mix and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic
sample container.
D . Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House Litter
a. visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality
e.g., areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate
percent of floor surface in each area.
b. `rake about 5 litter subsamples at locations
proportionate to item a. E.g., if 20% of litter
of similar visual quality is around feeders and
writers, take 1 subsample there and the other 4
subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
C. A!. each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6"
area down to earth floor and place in a plastic hucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix
and add about 2--3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample
container such as a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From Stockpile
a. Fake subsamples from about 5 locations at least lei"
into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and
seal.
-1. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
t:. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed.
residues from container with clean water );gut, do not use
disinfectants, soaps or treat in any other. way.

0
r
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
?, Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze or transfer to lab
quickly.
C. Hand --delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer.
, If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such
as newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper and tape.
F.. Commercial_ sample containers and mailers are also available.
Contacts:,
F.
G
i. A&L Eastern Agrit:ulWA L.ab, he,
7621 Whitepine Road
Richmond, VA 23237
Ph: (8041 743.9401
I Fisher Scientific Co
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
iii. Po4yloam packers
2320 S. Foster Avo.
Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: 131 2) 398-01 10
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Ave.
Ft Atkinson. WI 53538
Private analytical labs are also available, but sample analysis
costly.
The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i.. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P. 0. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4.00 along with the sample.
M . Include thy, following identification information with
sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey
breaders, brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown
on litter; etc.)
C. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry;
swine -pit slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler --
house litter, stockpile)
iv. Routine analysis performed on all samples: N, P, K, ca,
Mg, Na, S, Fe,
Mn, Zn, Cu, R
V. Additional analysis performed upon request: ISM, Mo, C.d,
Ni, i>b

G _V.
Producer. ✓r L 1`f►1c"i : r`r::;'r� {�' ;T s A,
Location: EA L:�. 47 6vap
Address: P, :Z IS
Telephone:
Type operation: ! .-15
Ntnnber oif Animal Units: _i i� v
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste should be analyzed.
before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged
so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
Lhr. crops t.o be grown.
Several. factor, are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil. types are important as they have different
in -filtration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year.
Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface
waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients :for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior
to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements
may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
Amount of waste produced per Year
_5'10c i 9/ ��/ prie
animal units X 3,y E. /L/ waste/animal unit/year
y.. l 0 4e waste/year
l ya
Amount of Nitrogen produced -_per year
1 y animal units X lbs N/animal unit/year
1bs . N/year _ 1JV 3.3 6 i tir All �uv U _ i q 6 y i6s,
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner,.
page 1

, . " - . ks, -
' 'I'le 1-,o."[J awt.ng acreage will be needed for waste application based on
-�h6 ee6p to eirawn afld guefaft appliaatiah:
Table 1.: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
-# Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
'Iva 14
3
.��
�✓
.3E)0
gs
13�?�
Ta
as
a�, a
¢ SZ) Z)
_-
3
�5r6
�.3>
��s
ss
173 -
r
Total Table 1
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
Tract Meld Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
%F 8
Total Table 2
Total. Table 1
. Total
Amount of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
- a 095
page 2

'Yhn producer shall be responsible for covering all dry waste either
)jy roof, tarp, or plastic from the time it leaves the poultry house
until it is land applied.
Kiere. owners of animal operations do not have adequate amounts of
land to apply the waste, the producer must provide a written
agreement whereby another landowner has agreed to land apply oi-
al,l.ow l.a.nd applAc.ation on his or tier lanai.
Call the Soil Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation
District office after you receive the waste analysis report to
obtain the amount per acre to apply and the application rate prior
L,o applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation:
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
I agree to carry out this waste management plan according to the
terms of the agreement. Failure to comply with the waste m,anagemeri-r,
plan will automatically require any cost share funds to be refunded
to their source.
Producer: ( "5 Date: 2 ��
1
:C understand that Mr./Mrs. does not have
ample lard -to apply the animal waste produced from his/her animal.
operation. 1 have agreed to utilize the waste produced from the
operation and agree to carry out this waste management plan on land,
that: 1 own or operate.
Recipient Landowner:
Date:
System Designer : � . � . Gc%_I4� ' � Date: 12
SWCD Rep�_esentative:
Design Approval,:
page 3
Date:
Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Rick W. Fulford
Caj One Inc.
Rt 2, Box 270
Tarboro, NC 27886
Dear Mr. Fulford:
Lr!XA
14T
A&4;a
IDEHNR
Division of Environmental Management
August 9, 1995
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Caj One Swine Operation
State Road 1430
Edgecombe County
On July 13, 1995, Mr. Shane McCarthy from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This
inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems
associated with waste disposal systems.
Mr. McCarthy' a site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was
not discharging to the surface waters of the state through any manmade pipes,
ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater).
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are the
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of Environmental
Management is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect
the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of
wastewater to surface waters of the state are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties.
The Raleigh Regional
If you have any questions
at [phone].
H:\cajone.pig
Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
regarding your inspection please call Shane McCarthy
Sincerely,
J�Garrett
Y
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/ 10% post-consurner paper

NORTH'CAROLINA DEPARTMENT O`' ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
Farm Name,!Owner
Inspection Date
Farm Number
c
Mailing Address
Facility Telephone Number
A"r2?Q 2,7t�L
(ZI-d (�t"— (,e,j
rum- -7
/L1Y
NC -
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in the Comments Section to enable
the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate corrections:
SECTION I
Animal Operation Type.
Horses, cattle, elpoultry, or sheep
SECTION II
Y [ N [ COMMENTS
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head), horses
(75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and poultry (30,000
birds with liquid waste system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for Animal Operation
REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained in this facility
for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management records (Volumes
of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage
with specific cover crop)? L, , E ( , �L , h ,�-° c
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum setback criteria for
neighboring houses, wells, etc.

SECTION III
Field Site Management
1.
Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Ling tream?
I,„
j
2.
Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3.
Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4.
Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION PLAN?
5.
Is animal waste discharged into waters
of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices?
6.
Does the animal waste management at this farm
adhere to Best Management Practices (BMP) of the
approved CERTIFICATION?
7.
Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient It
freeboard? How much? (Approximately '2- )
8.
Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
Comments
j� c� 11� c :' -f�y tkjrck'
11 Y I N I COMMENTS I