330004_PERMIT FILE_20171231

�4 I� 6-F,
Type of Visit: 0 Co iance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:_4D Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
.....
Date of Visit: ArrivalTime: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 2ljl Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
- r -
Onsite Representative: af C,l� 6 Integrator; 1?;7 Af
Certified Operator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
Caci
Current<
Pp
Wet Point
'I��i
EDEsign
� aci
i
Current
Poaco
itilNF
Design
«�IIli{lilllllllll
Current
e
P h
p•
.
ryp
ty'
Finish
Laver
gyp'
DairyCow
Cty
imp.
rrFeeder
Feeder
on -Layer
DairyCalf
o Finish
Dair Heifer
o Wean
Design,
urrent
D Cow
o Feeder
D . P,oultr.
Ca acit
PaP.
Non -Dairy_
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
E
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NF
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
NA
J61710
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 214.12015 Continued

Pacility Number: ' - C_j Date of Inspection: r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Ln It
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i—ntegrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ N E
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes:No
No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ICY n L1/L
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
PNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
on?
acres determination?
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
jNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Othcr:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiVN
ludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21417015 Continued

facility Number: 3 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes❑
rNo NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
[3NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
fi No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
510 d P ,St, rve y (vo � cl/u P ► V Po7G -old tj
CWh b ,rO"O r7 )-- (�-16
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
t"'5tplz l�
Phone: C( I F t V 2e©
Date: J_ — O —N
21412015

a r /,.7
Type of Visit: Q;Kom nee Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ® County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
11
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer I
Cattle
i Cow
Design
Capacity
.C•urrent
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
INon-Layer
I
i Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design C*urgent
Dr, P,oultr. Ca .aeit P,o P.
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
La ers
Non -Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
r
fO"ther
urke s
urke Poults
III
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
�/yYes❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

jFZlity Number: - Q Date of Ins ection: Z 17
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): o�trp `� PLD f•
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
a-0 or
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
KN DNA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental r at, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes CZNNo, ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 '3 - d[Z jDate of Ins ection:
OF
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes oNo
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, fiver -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1. Y,
.5' (h cj3 C 5ce r v ��-J D l/_- - i I
l�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
�—
Reviewer/inspector Signature: �' ?'G'-L,-! (Z-
Phone: � ` (I (I
Date: 3 -
21412015
Page 3 of 3

R
(Type of Visit: Rr70u:ie
ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Jc� G��l�"����/ cf Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: i"13rs
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design A Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
]Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr, P■oultr, C*a acl P,o P.
Layers
D Cow
Non -Da'
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Broad Cow -
Other
Other
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) [3Yes No NA [3 NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes Voo
[3 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

T Facili Number: - ©C Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): . `r (
(-A . u
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
t No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): fS e-r �,. ►1
i4 ttYr� , "ar_ .'l[--, 6w5"
• r
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesVN
❑NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�L]NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
a-KO'D NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [] Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the a priate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [] Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412014 Condnued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: r/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain uny.YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or-anyother ,comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as. necessary) "
5(4 JYA e te"R
7
p?-. t s cur 5?r 26 16
51 r 7 �j r (_> n
V
Iy5L-5
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Gct S le� 7lr cJe�/
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7V - Y ZO G
Date: A -a- lc
21412014

Type of Visit: Wom ' ce Inspection O Operation Review .9'structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ir A. Arrival Time:/ OS;J Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 13 Owner Email:
Owner Name: i ar t:;�' >I Fdw Phone:
Mailing Address: Lp Q2 t3 t ,, 4'n� �.-9 n 2l►h ? .,..,.. ,,,.. ..
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
WetfflfaRe!
sign Current
City Pop.
Design Current
C*attle Capacity P.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
IFDesign
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, Poultr,
aci P,o
Non -Da'
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Broad Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Pouets
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesFD_]
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -e> Date of Inspection: Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes o NA
[�] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): D k 6o 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes o A
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes o NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No Q NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes []No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility Number: - Date of inspection: .
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[3 Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Yes [:]No
[:]Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Cominnents (refer to question #):,Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations�oriany other, comments:.s�
Us,�drawin s affacilitYto better.ex lains.rtuations use additional pagesas necessarY)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
(G 4h3ef IN n � S' � l ✓L(.�J U� ��2 — t'ZyGIG E—�.1 �r c� .
4ori Lwn A?n J n&u/ p� ID o� 7 e4
Phone: - V- V Z-v�
Date: Sz' sf f
21412011
Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
I Tk?WA
lrl2i
NCDENR
NORTH CARcUKA DePARTMENT o¢
ENVIRONMENT ^No NATURAL RE9ounc"
Division of Water Quality
August 13, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RRECEIPT QUESTED
Mr. Richard W. Fulford
The Hanor Company, Inc.
876 Country Club Road
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
Subject: Notice of Violation
Hanor Hwy. 97 Truck Wash
Permit No. WQ0014928
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Fulford:
On Augus( 8, 2002, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject spray irrigation facility. Mr. Wayne Barrett, ORC, was on
site to serve as a guide and to answer any questions regarding the facility. The inspection
revealed the following:
Mr. Barrett indicated that Mr. James Arnold who originally had signatory authority for
Permit No. WQ0014928 was no longer associated with the Hanor Company in North
Carolina, and that you were now serving in that role. Mr. Barrett did also state that the Hanor
Company had filed this change as required by 15A NCAC 2B.0506(b)(2)(D).
2. The lagoon had approximately 50 inches of available freeboard, however, there was evidence
of some solids (saw dust) on the lagoon liner. Mr. Barrett said that the lagoon may have as
much as 18 inches of saw dust on the bottom of the liner. This problem was also noted in
last years compliance inspection dated March 26, 2001.
Mr. Barrett stated that the Hanor Company had plans to eliminate the saw dust from ever
getting into the lagoon, and showed Mr. Towell a new solids separator that was still in a
shipping crate. While the plan to eliminate the solids from your lagoon sounds very
promising, please note that any change in a treatment unit covered under your
permit will require that you submit plans by an engineer to the Division, and that an
Authorization to Construct will be required before construction can begin.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone (919)5?1-4700 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyclediiO% post -consumer page

Mr. Richard W. Fulford
The Hanor Company, Inc.
Page 2
3. Permit Condition III.,5., states that three copies of all records specified in Condition III., 2.,
shall be submitted on or before the last day of April, August, and December of each year.
A records check revealed that the Division of Water Quality is receiving the required NDAR-1
forms but has not been receiving any lagoon monitoring data nor any data related to nitrogen
loading on your two spray fields.
A further check revealed that the monitoring data for the lagoon was being included along
with the GW-59 monitoring forms that are being sent to the Groundwater Section. Mr. Barrett
was informed of this via telephone and now he understands that this data is to be separated.
However, the failure to submit the required data relating to nutrient loading is a violation of
your permit, and as such could be subject to civil penalties of up to $' 10,000.00 per day, per
violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within ten days of your receipt. Your response should
outline your plans to correct the above referenced violation. If you have any questions regarding
this matter, please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

(Type of Visit: /0 Com cc Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation () Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: %J Departure Time: r} Z County:
Farm Name: jr ,� ^/�j (LYh SOwner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: j2�y�G Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry `Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Ix
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
can to Feeder
-'50
on -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
it
C acit
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Isv any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes N�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - b C Date of ins ection: a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
N ff
NA FINENo NA [ ] NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environj5No�
t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [] Yes
NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4;>NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable _Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r i /)—sw
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ON❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
4� "" ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ZN ❑ NA
❑ NE
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking [] Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fait to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
Wo ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
tj No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - d Date of Inspection: ,;
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments, (refer to question #) Explain a3ny, YES°answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other, comments . = a,
Use drawings of facility.to better. explain s►tu.ations,(use�additional pages as necessary).
s lk7 �� a
1 + L. r 3­0
-s
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /2Grs' I
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

Zr1Z-r
Type of Visit: Cvm,pWance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timer Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: E4-1 h r1 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: "" �l� hr4/02 r'{ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
- y Design
Design Current
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Cty Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
Feeder to Finish
i
Farrow to Wean
Design Cur`.rent
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,oultr, Ca aci Go .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
r
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E;P<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesFNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?' ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): G` `1 71�
❑ Yes
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
ZN
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
t at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ayolieation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): (W 7 7 . L.Jl414-'t . XXr rn k. Lj A
-T .
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes N -
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
h b
t e appropriate ox.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Trans f ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectio ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Fneili umber: 33 1 Date of Inspection: Xf t Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes &o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes kNo
NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use'drawings`,of facility.to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
14j �-5'//1rS S`oed5 o CP.tn'�`
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tke 54r, l Q�
Page 3 of 3
Phone;
Date: 1V a_l / t/
21412011

l 1 lb, th
Type of Visit O;Routine
m nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival "Time: i--t Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: I&C A41-7 G,e�ti`f�-vt r Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e 0 6 = it Longitude: = ° a { 0 d
JU Wean to Finish I I 'U ILI Layer I
I
LJ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Non -Layer 1
❑ Dairy Calf
[:]Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other ❑ Tu rkey Pou Its
❑ Other ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
eNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
ZNo,'
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
❑ Yes
NA
ElNE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
ElYes
o ❑ NA
[I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

• Facility Number: — O Date of Inspection I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes��NoO NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 6'F �— �//1�7_ p., 2 to /
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): o �� 7 // 7�Lf �( 2-y ef
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes <No NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El:No,
N NA El NE
S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [I Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑ NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o [:I NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes;�Nq ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (r�efer�t�o�gnestt�o�n,�#) ^�E plamRany�YESanswersvand/orany recommenda`�t��ons or any other,comments. .
Use drawings;ofgiaerl�tyktobetterexplain;s�t�gations(usez�dd►tional pages as necessary),:
�'`c_��`i��i.:���t.
/N�'/L� sGc ✓ e- Tv Lo S t4 � SK 01 v4_1 /
Reviewer/Inspector Name' ;VS Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature: —r e, Date: D i o
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection t1
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 13-1�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ We her Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesPNoE]
A ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 .12128104

Type of Visit Q Compli ci: Inspection Q Operation Review tructure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /a<p poi Arrival Time: "lid U Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 8Lt n -�i n A n + F-M /Ztvj Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Oc of 6 L3c, n 4 i n
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = g = u Longitude: = ° = d 0 «
Design Current
Design esign C►Ient
Swine
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
I I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -La ers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
FEI TurkeyPoults
Other Number of Structures;
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes p' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
��n "❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Date of Inspection ( a
Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Np -0 NA
El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �j D ' I O 1 %� I)
-7 r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑•NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
e.
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat; notify DWQ
�
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
�No'r El NA
El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
C-, o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
/'1
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
+:lia'f:t �if}s E 4k� i� 4
Comments .(reler to:question #) Explain,any YES:answers and/or any recommendations or.any ©they commegts..: t ..
'Use)drawings of facility to better explairi;srtuattons: (use`ailditional
� pages;as necessary):: ; ; � � {
aPk�
Reviewer/inspector Name t§ ,.t I ; • � Phone: 79/ - ZO—o J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: LZ .� g Date: U
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Type of Visit: O;?Rpou
lance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: � I Arrival Time: I 77q I Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 1z 4 1-ofFi f oeZ _> Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
nn
Onsite Representative: I�� Fo,
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
D,e
Design Current
Swine Gapacity Pop. Wet Poultry
Capacity Pop.
Cattle Gapacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
i 42
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D ® P,oultr.
Ca aci P`o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
K
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
1 Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: Date of Inspection: laljl
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? 0 Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 515
Structure 2 StructuredStructure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: le
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): (d U ZL/L A C/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e,, large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ��No, ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes m No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1�,Q ✓ o l ,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
V"'
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment`?
❑ Yes yo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfe ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili NUmber: -d Date of Inspection: 119 1/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2No D NA D NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
DNA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional mcornmen'dations or any other coininents::
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �3�.s� e C /
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

0
lReason
Type of Visit: 4 Co nce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: L L_L_��aZ Arrival Time: Departure Time: P! County:
Farm Name: _ �. f /ice Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: R­ e_g Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
We to Finish
I I Layer
I
jDairyCow
can to Feeder
Non -La er
D sign Current
Ca} aci P,o
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
�
D , , Poultr.
La ers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Region:
Discharges and Stream,l,mpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑' Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
gNo NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
Na ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - 6 jDate of Inspection: J
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
.2--,
❑ Yes j
N ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
No Z] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta rest, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes;No
No A ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes "N�oNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ 'Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
�
12. Crop Type(s); _�Y n L
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes No A ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ,NA ❑ NE
acres determination? 7
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [3Yes�_NA
No ❑CIA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit.readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists [:]Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other;
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [] Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections S ge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - p L Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 6❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft ExplainanyYES answers and/orany additional recommendations°or anyother comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
yV&J
_5- &J k &4 Jrf� r/ (2 (%tom.- F) Q I j n c,4- rs
OV-1 U OY 1 C
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �� 0
Date:'
21417011

LeasonforVisit
f Visit Q�Routlne
m nce Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 J!rla
IArrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: (9r-4R-`'--___ _ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator:
7
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: [=] o [=] ' = « Longitude: '= o =
Design Current
Design C•urreot
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop�ulatrnn
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Daia Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers
❑on -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures: 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �No[3
❑ NA [I NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA [3NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesZNA❑ El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ElYe No ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

r Facility Number:
Date of Inspection I 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): r //
Observed Freeboard (in): ! 0 6V (Ike o (v
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ,
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No .❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �`No❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate Public health or environmental thhrr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Zo
El NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 121 No, ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) �* 5-14-
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ YesEJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes L/J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes INo
El NA ❑NE
❑NA El NE
�Comme�nsfs,(`refer,to�questinn�;#)y<<Exp4�aus���y�{YES�an�wersandlo���any�re�co�mm��d���onsprnnyother,comments.
�Us�_ra;gw�mgsof�fac�)I�ty,to�better�explamisiii�tuah3ons; {usc�ad�dEt��nal pages asFnecessary): � �'
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;' ,:, ,,`� Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: /D Z
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

I
Facility Number: — p Date of Inspection a
Required Records &_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes >11
NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If es check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
P g p Y�
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections�No
ather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes;N>�o��'N
NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes�No'
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addttionial Com►nenfsiandlorFlDrifVV ."4,y
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

.Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit (gCo fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z7 D Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: i �I� U r�!`''tYzh� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:�+ Integrator: 8k ! 4 r -,
Certified Operator: .7 Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = 4 =61 Longitude: 0 ° = ` 0
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Non-L
Pullets
Pouets
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
DEX Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
El Yes No NA El NE
❑ Yes N El NA El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility NuMber: f J —b Date of Inspection a7 L
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes j2rNo NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El o ❑ NA ElNE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes ;No
o A ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes rNo
NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑YesNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ;o�
❑ El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) n/ [yy�sbv �' r �-► w 4-. ram} a �i
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes '❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L Date: Z o 7
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 33 - O y Date of Inspection Z u
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ElWUP ❑ Checklists El Design [I Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
No El NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
No ❑ NA
El NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
NA
El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Oth I s
er ssue
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

a Division of Water Quality.
�FaCt11"' Number. (j [ O Division of Soil and Water Conservation -
- — — -- 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Co ante Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ok Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
lO�a
Farm Name: Zn— Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: &e 7 41'2 Y Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: 0 0 = , =1 Longitude: = o = , = 6f
Design Current Design Current Design; Current
Swine; , Capacity Population. Wet Poultry Capacity Populatton Cattle y f,,, Capac>�ty Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
i
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other s
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Lavers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
°
Number.of Structures
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes 2<o El NA El NE
❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes�`No❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 6qpf' Z h �— G e �t5
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
tfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of.questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
"-
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
ElYes
2<0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ARRlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) S7V v �a,*7 f , r� e c e ^ ,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
L2<0 NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N NA
jNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments(refer.to question #) . Explain any YES. answers and/or any recommendations or, any other'comrrients
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional. p a ges":as nec essary) q
Reviewer/Inspector Name I Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tz
Date: G V
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection <
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WIJP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes 12 <[:j NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �`No❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. LJ Yes 6:�INo l...l NA LINE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No .❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yesaco)"'�o
oNA ❑ NE
25. Did the facilityfail to conduct a sludge survey as required b the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
g Y 9 Y
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or. Drawings:
r✓ h ��s c� �, ,�y l r. rGq `I C� S�LP.�r �+ 11 i tJ" h ,G2 d -�J �! �4
QG r•+ B, 4-v
Page 3 of 3 I2/2&04

33 H o
Type of Visit 45Co;out'lne
plia Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure'rime: County:
Farm Name: 6q 07 ji,eUg 6.,14 I f*oa&. Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 00 Q3 u &I
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: o = = Longitude: C
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
IDesign Current Design
Wet Poultry Cacity Popu own Cattle Capac%ty
Current
Populati,
❑
Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
❑
Wean t Feeder
❑Non -La er
"$
Dry Poultry
""
❑ La ers
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockee
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑
Fe er to Finish
❑
❑
arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Non -La ers
❑
Gilts
❑ Pullets
❑
Boars
❑ Turke s
Qther
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures;
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
/No NA
[I NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No NA
El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
ElNE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — hqj Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment ,�,
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 1a ❑ NA ❑ NE
`Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Y SJc I - 04.-._ 2._. " { LS` w L LS . ,3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed freeboard (in): Z e(
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EK_0__'❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes oE NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10%n or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) Y✓1 , aan C� L 4-d, 5 , t , r��u. �f�
13. Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
.,'NO NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes
o ❑°NA
El NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
�❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
rt ��
Reviewer/Inspector Name'�� Ep, Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
t9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ 'WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes ;No
o -NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections
❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
EiNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

F ility Number Date of Visit: ®Time: dC=
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted [3 C,ertfiied © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName:....k.l{..!1.r.'?�a.....r.n....��i+ ............................... County:.....,......................................,......................................,
OwnerName: ........ .......................................... ........................................................................ . Phone No:
Marling Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:.......} . U � �� ^ ............... Integrator:
1'`................
Certified Operator: ...................................................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
[]Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude • ' " Longitude • ° «
DischaMes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes No/
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? []Yes <o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structu
Identifier: ...................`.............................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 3 3— L/
Date of Inspection 1—F�-*
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type d #I i e, 5-
,_SN14`rr�}I�-�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air (duality representative immediately.
❑ Yes eN<o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes;Zo
❑ Yes a
❑ Yes No
ElYes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
.�z E7s .10 t, ..�.�E llE Bwd -. 1 ....... N" - ,"A s§ E ...€ 3da{IIi? a{�4Q - >;x .»:. i.�&.:k.«.: ... ,....k' L p. f s fE
Comments (refer to,sleteshon #} rpiainn comets andfor any ar►xn�nnerd, ar�anY other comme
5 . F'%<B.><.P •[ > °E4:'.c -aE' 1$ 'ti FS - dfv 64ti:L .119E 'v.'Ox4f8
b ,€§.�€�. � § e i a= t �
Llse drawin& of faeriit to,better explarn sttnat3ons � use dditianalgpages as'xt esSaxy}� its}} ❑Field Coy final Notes
aa-'xgj^*aa3EE e c=i 'Eie: �;:`�nE. p Sa E.
a, : k , 5 .> .,.a.a..< �545.. �9[ 1}3.;p a ¢ .s {. ? . § w�• .,
i€ S S, •. ?3.. $ S 3aa °e Ear {sihssiE
taFFs�aar,tx3aa6,�sr„a.;.3.afa.
HW
!P Reviewer/Inspector Name � ¢¢a
€f �1MTA`,_ B¢ 34r.:a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7.J 0
12112103 Continued

Faaolity-Nuinber: Date of Inspection O t
Required Records_ &_Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After I" Rain
❑ Yes jNo
1"o
❑ YesN
El Yes
❑ YesVNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes5No
No
;Z
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Type of Visit
Q Co nee Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason For Visit Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility -Number Date of Visit: Time:
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
ermitted O Certified ©�C�onditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: t 9✓`�*-,4 %`"!jl/1'�-- County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 4 u Longitude ' 6
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacitv Po ulation :.:.:Cattle. Capacity Population .
❑ Wean to Feeder_+ __j ❑ Layer I ❑ Dai
Eler F to Finish ❑ Non -La er ❑ Non-Dai
Farrow to Wean t -_ -
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total- Design .Capacity, "= '
❑ Gilts ,
❑ Boars Total SSLW'
Number of Lagoons 'I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spr.j Field Area
Holdmg;Pond�l:Sohd Tres F,
_Y4 r pa� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 1�9- I 1 Z
Freeboard (inches): S ]t q
05103101
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 12
� 1VU
El Yes Na
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes V
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: —EVI
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes rr/N
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ JExcessiv_ a Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes J2<0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ N
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes eNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes �N��
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ YesiN
N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
c
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) El Yes
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ElYes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Ye No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visi
tCn iiiments1refer to questian� #) ex -Olt in any +ES answers`.and/or any reeomtt endatio or any other comments a '
Useedrawings of facility to better eirplatn situations.a(use addttlonal�pages as necessary) [] Field Cove Final Notes
,
Reviewer/Inspector Name ���, ���`F Z'7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Type of Visit QFCom liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit A Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
ciiity Number tSEEI
Date of Visit:
Permitted O Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered
Farm Name: _(1161ro-rk rnl-
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
'Title:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:
Phone No:
Phone /No:
Integrator: 3& - /
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �R �� Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population . .,Cattle,, Capacity, Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I I Dai
El Fee o Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
arrow to Wean
ElFarrow to Feeder ❑Other-
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Identificr: I
Freeboard (inches): '� V� �i �T/ Lvi h L }�
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — d
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A,Rplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type /� e, "-4. J a, """'o , SVti 10OV.,-6- s
❑ Yes ATNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes rNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ElYes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El El
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes FNo
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? /
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes rrNo
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ElYes
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/inspector Name I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date:
Continued

Facility Number: 33 — dyl Date of Inspection �-
Qdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes JQNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes VN
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes !Q No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes N
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes No
Additional Comments=and/or Drawings: "
AL
05103101

Type of Visit {2rComplia nspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number mate of Visit: [yF-� Time-
0 Not O erational Q Below Threshold
[] Permitted © Certified
[3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name:...�ll.(2...J..1..^..,a1...C2`'.......:~.. ..... County:.L:.4�'I� f4�.......................................
OwnerName :................................................... .................. ............ Phone No:
................................................................................................................................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
MailingAddress: ........................................•.............................................................................................................................................................................................•
Onsite Representative:.....(7.�`5..4� �.'..`. ? ......... Integrator:.. .....................................
Certified Operator: ,,,,, u , , ,., Operator Certification Number:.,,,,,,,,.
w /1
'.... ........................................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �� Longitude �• ����
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
j] Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design ;Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW `.
;, Number of Lagoons S : ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
HoldinggPonds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
a........_.f .....:.
Discharges & Stream Itnpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
c. II' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge, bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
01/01/01
❑ Yes I�IQo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 011' o
❑ Yes I o
Cl Yes;110
❑ Yes ❑
Continued

Facility Plumber: 3 — Date of .lnspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes LrJ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Fcf 3 ')f-1 �. S'r�.../..� �rc� p!r ...r i",i .s C.
........................................................................... ................ .......................................................
Freeboard(inches) .......................y.. y ............... ................................................................................
? y e/ S `' ..................................................................... .... .... ...
�No
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
El Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o�
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9. Do any stuetures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
Waste Applicatiort
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
ElYes
E3 too
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
0- oo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0
,�No
17. Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of thA�ayli ld boundary? ❑ Unknown
es ❑ No
Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
1:1 No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
o22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
rN_
23, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
/
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
o
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
ElYes
[ No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
lip
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
o
Odor Issues
�es[__]No
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
29.
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
Are dead disposed 24 hours?
Cl Yes
2
there any animals not of properly within
Jt
01/O1/01
Continued

Facilky Number: - jj Date of Inspection Z jj
Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes 0'No
❑ Yes LdlO
❑ Yes ZI <No
❑ Yes 1`.d'1Vo
❑ Yes o
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name; ' ° d r"�' ` W I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: CI
01/01/01

Facility Number — o Lagoon Number Lagoon Identifier ...!.. ►- •..........
O Active 0 Inactive LatitudeEl 0 E] Longitude
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres): I (( o v
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Waters ply well within 250 ft of the lagoon.)
❑ n-site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
�l
es tha 00 ft O 30o ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
es O No
0<5 05-10 0>10
0 Yes �40�0 Unknown
;e`sO No 0 Unknown
O Yes O No Unknown
43. Was, groundwater encountered during construction? O Yes O No O'Unknown
44. Depth to Groundwater: nknown
45. Spillway? 0 Yes o
46. Adequate Marker? 0 Yes No
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure? 0 Yes No
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): I� 1�

Facility Number Lagoon Number Lagoon Identifier roti-...........I........................................
O Active O Inactive Latitude ❑ �{ �'�, Longitude r
By GPS or Map? 10 GPS ❑ Map I GPS file number:
36. Surface Area (acres): j U Y S u
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
10 +.
ess than 00 ft O 300 ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
es O No
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes o O Unknown
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards? es O No O Unknown
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards? O Yes O No nknown
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction? O Yes No..Znknown
kno n.
P
44. De th to Groundwater:
45. Spillway? O Yes o
i
46Adequate Marker? O Yes;-�o
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure? O Yes a
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): .7

Facility Number �3 - {g c� Lagoon Number ."X...... Lagoon Identifier
Q Active O Inactive Latitude F] = 0 Longitude
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water pply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
7n-site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40.Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater_
45. Spillway?
46'. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
U
0 less than 300 ft 300 ft - 1000 ft Q greater than 1000 ft
es O No
0<5 Q5-10 >10
O Yes No O Unknown
Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No OCnknown
O Yes No ;tnekKn n
nknown
Q Yes o
Q Yes td No
O Yes a
/ ;?� t"
'-2,o

Lagoon Numb Laoon IdentifierFacili Number �3 �
O Active O Inactive Latitude a Longitude
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map I GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres): d l y �
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water pply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
On -site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40.Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
i
4 dequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to'the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
, I �
O less than 300 ft 300 ft.- 1000 ft O greater than 1000 It
es O No
0<5 05-10 00>10
O Yes � O Unknown
es O No O Unknown
O Yes O No Unknown
O Yes o O Unknown
nknown
O Yes ;�o
O Yes �a
O Yes ;;o
7

Facility Number 3 — p c Lagoon Number „lam Lagoon Identifier ............... ;,........�
O Active O Inactive Latitude 0 = = Longitude
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map I GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Zn
r pply well within 260 ft of the lagoon?
-site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
rY/
O less than 300 ft 00 ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
es O No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes o 0 Unknown
Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No Unknown
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction? O Yes 6 �NoO'
Unkno n
44. Depth to Groundwater: nknown
45. Spillway? O Yes o •
46. Adequate Marker? O Yes No
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure? O Yes o
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): Z 7
�jaP��, �

r-- S S - 6 Y
E736400.0 E736450.0 E736500.0 E736550.0 E736600.0 E736650.0
N231950.
+
+
+
+
+
N231900.
+
+
+
+
N231850.4
+
+
+
+
+
N231800
N231
N231
US State Plane 1983 Scale 1:2000 r020517a.ssf
North Carolina 3200 N 0 250.0 2/6/2001
NAD 1983 (Cones) T Pathfinder Office
Feet ® Tumble

D
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .Y...................................................................
.... ,� �: K:..�....�1�........................................................................ County:.....................
OwnerName:.....(..:.... yi?....il..... ..'.E.�''?....... ....................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
��^^��
Facility Contact: ....1J..I1. u5....�lsxt.�.�.�]...........Title: ..............................................................Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:............................................
Certified Operator:_- ... ­ ............ ................ ............................................... ... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. _�.
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................�
Latitude ' ° 64 Longitude ' 4 «
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. It'discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'!
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: uu r , _ �!
Freeboard (inches): 2 c( _1.N .. `3.rr........................5..........
.......................................... ....
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
I
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes I ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number- —Octflute cif Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AV121ication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to Have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facilit require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. We any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
iQ yiol 4it?tis or dg#iC.. ...were noted ilitring fhis:visit; Yojx wil� reeoiye Rio further .
ctirresboride>' e: about this vesit.:.:.:::::::::::::...
Comments',(referto:que' tion #) 'Explain any3YlES answers and/or,any;recnmtnenda
UseFdiawingsof facthty to better explain situationg.:4B6 additional pages as necessai
❑ Yes l>SNo
❑ Yes
El Yes�`No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes <0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 70,
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes LdN0
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes LC1 N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
-A,
Reviewer/Inspector Name f t i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y�..�f Dater' j/ LG%Q h
3/23/99

iL
Facility Number: Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes i _
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ElYes o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes , 1Vo
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes`
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 7No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ❑ Yes o
Additional.Comments arid/or Drawings:--
... .. .,_. ..,...
,v O
PS
A.
w
3/23/99

a
EDivision
vision of Soil and Water Conservation. E3Other Agency
of Water Quality
. 10 Routine GTomplaint O Follonv-up of DIV2 inspection O Follow-up of .USiy C', review O Other
Date of Inspection
F - ---- --------------------
.Facility Number
Time of Inspection ®24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered E3 Certified E3 Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not O eratinnal ,r�D-p�ate Last Operated: ..........................
County J`�........ Farm Name: -B, tN!. f�-t G�� �/�' r „.........
Owner Name: ....... C. 1-yy5��.................................. �4!Jf1.'."` .........? +.' `Ls.................. Phone No:......... Z `f 3 `7'Z ........
Facility Contact:..C.l�.......P..C...., oti ..... r l._.=: � title ... Phone No: ........................
MailingAddress:....,...n�............... ...............6°.x.................Y. . �....................'Aw..I�...IJ 0.,�.....,.......,..............I.....................
OnsiteRepresentative:........:. ......... ................................................. Integrator: ............ �.................................................................
Certified Operator......... 4....A-.......I................... .... I !�....: g-......................,.... Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
0
5..........12................................................................,.....................................................,......
......... (?..Y... ..
Latitude 0 =1 « Longitude • �� �4�
Design CurrenE
Design Current Design Gurrenit 4
Swune Capacity; PapuIattton
,. Poultry Capacity„ Popitlat<on'; Cattle apacitry 1'opp,�tton
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
•:' ❑ Dairy
a
❑ Feeder to Finish
E7' ❑ Non -Layer
I
I0 Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
t 1t]0
pE
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
El Farrow to Finish
{
TotalDeSign Capacity
El Gilts
❑ Boars
j >� Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons l;Holdtng,Pnnds :,® ❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area El Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes WoNo
❑ Yes
[�'es �No
❑ Yes 5,40
❑ Yes Li&
❑ Yes l<o
❑ Yes RoNo
Continued on back

Facilit umber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 13N0
Structures (Lagoons,[told ine Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
. 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes @.I�o
Structure I Structure 2 Strrpucture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: G L#...............*.. i-?.�..L..# Z �?.Z1
............ . _................................. ...... ............................................
Freeboard(ft)..............y.............................. 3..............,.................{.......,......,.................., .............,............. 2...:.......................,.........,...........
b Lf-k bKc k wrap ro.., ;
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures. ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2*1NOo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes BKO
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [?Ao
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? 9Kes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type..........R.Y.e................................... I,�nR.r.M.Jd........................... ....... ....... ................................................................................ ......... I..............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes NK
MO/NoR
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ffl<o
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [+.�N0
• 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes &<O
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 5eNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes MIN
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes 1R<0
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 2�No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes 2'�o
D No.violation'•or. deficiencies were noted during this;visit:-:You:will recei've•no•f irther-:
:.•ctirrespQndegceaboutthis:visit:•:.....• -.-�•.�..�.�:�.• .: :�:�.�: .:. � :�.�'�:.�'- ;
3 eyNS b'� Sbme SPr�`�le`n►g OrJ
S'ON$ Dit f kN off . Sam t Srka Ir
NJJg 0#0 P4IiKee. , )) nose
°Ii$ 3`i8 3!►bs �Sr�sN^ tert�j +Zlo
j�1�4�ra+t SYA,'t. Olt 04,3oit/ $vie
Reviewer/Inspector Name
,ov4k q 4& J Id . N o
pf"Ule5 wa-de
1-eeI +uqS 0leenJV P&4i- 4op
J-11 co,4-3., /r a V e ))e �r� P(IJ1 46
Poe w rt1 arT d� -/c> 1A-P Slay
390raY iN7 tvN S or iy emo, C 1�
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G/(�/G, �if�t,�r Date:

JUL-14-1991 15: a6 FROM DEN IilHTEP QUALIT-V SECT I UN TO
I2R�7 P.02/02
Site Requires Irnrnediate Anent (-r,_ e
VIr
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEIVMN 1' J
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ✓C 4? 1995 t
Time:
' 1
Farm Name/Owner:
Ma.ilin g Address::
County: L� U!!n
Integrator: _ _ — _ ----____-- — _ Phone:
On Site Revresentative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: � �l �D r e / 3
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3S Longitude: �%� 3j_ �y Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the ruiimal Waste Lagoon have sufficient frceboa.rd of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour sterna event
i
(appzca cirizately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes o No Actual Freeboard:
Was an v seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No o,�e
Is adequate land available for spray'? Yes or No ? Is the cover crop adequate? Yes o<50
Crop(s) being utilized: S r rftj
Does the facility meet SCS minimum. setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings Y or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
.,c a-:imal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS .Blue Lime Stream? Yes or No
at:� al waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS iviap Blue Line? Yes or No
ani.mal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, tlusbing sysEem, or other
;iTni?a_� man-madd dc:ti ces? 'Yes or No If Yes, Please EXpl:ii%.
�1racC 111C F GiliLy inaintain adequate waste aia.ria.bernCTit Tecords (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific ac eage with cover crop,)'? Yes or No
r
Arlditional Corrlments: Ally r je r f w w gj4s p y w r yle �� pc , w�f�f I /so
0 qrt l v &4A
,frc,'IN 0 o is i Nee al Vi G c, v,*l 4t
lei <m,4f 3 Crret rh SCcrrel p� ifn SCret
r
dr 5 ()!. v r NOL Ce rn oil
IQIQ s �ir7t'f rti 0 Nee1y4t' �6sl,�,asC
COL)d on-erote- ll'
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
i cc � � l7 '� `OkvrCO/ q�P9 r5
S i g7z� rune
Use Attachments if weeded.
TOTAL P.02

Facility Number:
Division of Environmental Management 3
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 0 Sd 1
Time: aP 0 a,-. '
Farm Name:
I
�vh I h
i
Ste-, n�
r�Y w,
-- Grg t fa. County: _ ti e ca 1 e.
Owner Name:
Q
d �'"
�' "�-
_
— - - -Phone No: -
On Site Representative:00 1/ el Integrator:
Mailing Address: I t
A11 " p-ty4rr /VC
a
Physical Address/Location:_„ SR jd Q _ _"• - _ _ _ _ -
Latitude:___) I Longitude: I I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Sow dG4 ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder
OtherTyne of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: 6 (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each' lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑
Is any discharge observed? Yes ❑
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: QL-yLi, _ Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within I00 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?.
AOI -- January 17,1996
PA
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No�f]
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No-�
i
Is there evidence -of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Yes . Does record keeping need improvement? No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? IVA Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers. t oc. S�� a �'s,'f G��, . , J sae o ve ,'h wor'C
Ah wa;�C Wte4,w�• AlJ/ ih.
���' ,rY W1✓U1 ,�n��lypdEA� 3 �l rQ,.._'af� �I nfaeU��ph.
Signature: /.alz L-/" L-ZL-G
cc: FaciliryAssessment Unit
Drawines or Observations:
to fc la Joe n
AOi -- .January 17,1996
Date: 76 ds�da
Use Attachments if Needed
,
f0 C,� e 'I "C /Jr, rs�gry laSpah f f Gt�%� "Gi y
L/ f

tr
1 � t
State of North-Carollna ry
Department of EnvlronFnent,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Offlcet
tit
James-B. Hunt, Jr,-,Qovernor C
Jonathan B. Howes; Secretary : sue' xr ti ,� G H N F1'
4.
Division of Environmental; Wagement
N. Mays,24� 1996 '
t4 { 'r
C . B . Bunting '- . i"a O '.
Rte . 1, Box '°1' 4`B' r�:{RC�ss,;,,?
Pinetops, NC. 27684
Subject: CompZia`nce Inspection,
Bunting. Swine Operations;",.
w *,p F,grm'�Nos:, . 33 4, A33-23,. ,and 33; 3
yEdgecombe,County
Dear Mr'. Bunting: Ak
On May 21, 1996,, Mr. , Ted�i Cashion`,from this office conducted
compliance inspections :,of the sub jecthanima'1 facilities. The'
cooperation of Do'ug,Bunting`was appec3'ated. These, ti'nspections
were follow-ups dfis:,last year's inspections; and,,;are .a part of. the_,
Division's efforts to'determine potential probiems.associated with
liquid waste disposa ,,sys.teins
Mr. Cashion's site visits determine`d-..thatr..-wste awaterfrom
these facilities were not discharging to`the.-•,surface.'waters,of the
State. No manmade pipes, ditches; .-,or other prahbtped' conveyances
(for the purpose of willfully, 'dischargingl" `wastewate, ,,` were
observed.
The following items wem .noted at�each facility:
SR 1200, Main Office, Farm No. 33-3
Three primary lagoons feed into 1 secondary;. lagoon.
Vegetation around each lagoon has been cut,'al-lowing ,access for
inspection. Freeboard of the lagoons rangefrom 2'feet up':to ,
approximately 8 feet. Some holes were not'ed^on:.the dam. ,,,Mr,. '
Bunting was advised to fill and pack each hole-,w1th'clay to ensure.
the integrity of the dam.
SR 1204, Grant Farm, Farm No. 33-4
IR Y.
Each of the 6 lagoons had sufficient freeboard, ranging from
2 feet to approximately 8 feet. The nursery area noted in the last
inspection has been removed.
Mildred, Farm No. 33-23
Both lagoons had sufficient freeboard. The sludge stockpiled
beside each lagoon noted in the prior inspection had been removed
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

e
`Mr. Bunting
0
� Win,
'�. ���,�..
.. .. <,'P.R
•"'''`�'
May
24 1996 ;'f '
Page 2 �- • r -.4,
.r
and land applied, per Mr. Bu4i�g'.
tit v s f - i 4 .i t,,.,r`y' • . , ` •
Effective wastewater treatment and-�faci1i`ty stewardship. a i e a
responsibil ty of all:animal fac lity''operators. The Division of
Environmental, -,.Management is °'required= .to' enforce• water, .quality
regulations si'n order to protect tiie :naturii1: resources' -of the State .
Accordingly � iZ egal discharges of+,wastewater to surface waters of f'
the State are' -subject to the assessment`.ofl-civil penalties of up to
$10, 000 per day.w{r s
This office also reminds you that you are required,to have an
approved animal waste management `=plan ._ b)O December 100 ..' Mr.
Bunting stated that local';ag=ieultural..personnel,lwill visit the
farm in June to commence''.work }on ;this, plan.' ,jYou are reminded that
once completed, 'this:;.plan wi131�,W n effect, be the permit that the
facility will be,'+.operating under.:;,',Any vio]:ation , of the tplan,
including failure'to propeily�documen waste application activity,.'
or failure to maintain suffi'c ent freeboard, "wi11 be �iub jest � to
enforcement action by the Division. ri
You are also reminded that you wil'1 required to be: trained
certified as, or obtain the services o'f, an animal,,.wast@ mariragementY,
system operator prior" to January. l;, 199T., f, '`, t ,� ." Z
The Raleigh Regional` Office appreciatesyour :cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections,
please call Ted Cashion at (919 )' 57:1-4700 .
,Sincerely,-
f
J y G rrett #mow
Regional Water,,Quali,ty Supervisor N�
5 � r
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department= r'..
i 1
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservat`io`n Districti,`4'`,.'.'�;
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division, of Soil an _
Water Conservation
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\bunting2.ins

;Division f•Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
y..
©�1A. `•. on of Suit and W:iter`�Conservation - Compliance Inspection
ivision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
/ © Other Agency - Operation Review
outine 0 Cam laint o Follow-ir p of l)WQ ins ection Q 1'oll11R'-u r of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Dale of Inspection
Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm}
Permitted Certifiedrn Conditional) •} Certified 0 Registered gistcred Q Not O crational Date Last Operated:,
//
FarName: ��,.T nr County:
Owner Name: C 14 C............................................................. Phone No:....�� �....:.�Z.?....-.Y3...Y ....................
Facility Contact: ....Pis 4"..ox.. (. r' ............ Title: Phone No:.................... . ..............................
Mailing Address: .... .�?,..,....�,. i i ................................ Z6.......................... ... .......... I............
............ ............... ...........- s.2
Onsite I+;epresenlative:.........,.1� ii.{�.jr j `�..!1� Integrator: 13Lt n!"'..............................................
Certified Operator: .......0....... 8....... /1 . .!.� ..................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 4 " Longitude • ° 64
Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer -- I -
❑ Non -Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy .
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes 2<0
Discharge originated al: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conv,�yanc(: man-made?
1). ll' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharce is observed. what is the estimated Ilow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system`?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 StrUC1Ure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier
/,, /i t'� f I '^
Freeboard(inches):...........`�.Q.........................4.1. .1 "...........�.&.............................................................................................
1 /6/99 Continued on back

1"aci ity Number: — [7 fate of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of'questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimurn
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement'?
07AMWA
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponddding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type USG.irv�dia...-�P.y.....,rt!rC..-....... .....
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrig*anon, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable sethack criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IVo.vioiatiorts or. deficiencies.wert= noted cltirin .this:visit:. Y_ou nhl.rerceive nu further...:
• • egrrespiRideb} e: about this visit.:.:.:.:.:. ; , :.:. .
❑ Yes
-2<0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
es ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
...
❑ Yes ;_N_o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 1z Ko
❑ Ye o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes LI N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Comments.(refer to question #): ^ Explain any YES answers and/or any 'recommendationslor,any other comments
, ,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): t
12cc�r- / �n� i2cc�sjo� rl/0 06 (, F`---cam, AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: L 7
1/6/99

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number -4)(4 Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representati j)V1Ar n� Part Il eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: :::�,e/i/ Operation not required to secure WA
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP:
determination t this time based on
exemption EE1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: Yr j pounds
Irrigation System(s) - c�rc e : 1. hard -hose traveler; center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w p , stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part 1 exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D�D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in.Part Ill).
PART Il. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

•.a - 4
Revised January 22, 1999
.icility Number
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD 'COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER' Z IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES
SYSTEM
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of fie3d numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Govemor
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins R EC E ED Dee Freeman
Director
May 12, 2011 MAY 7 0 2011
Richard W. Fulford
NO l)r?di~i
VF Farms LLC Rafeig� RvgfoM office
7123 Howard Ave
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330004
VF Farms LLC
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear Richard W. Fulford:
Secretary
In accordance with your April 28, 2011 Notification of Change of Ownership and request to change
operation type without increasing the permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Richard W. Fulford, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the VF Farms LLC, located in Edgecombe County, with a swine animal capacity of
no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boai/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: 15,580 Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS330004 dated October 1, 2609. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please r)av careful attention to the
record_kegping and monitoring conditions in this _permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location-. 2728 Cap'dal Blvd., Raleigh, North Carohna 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877.623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org �atllrallr�
An Equal Opportunity S Affirmative Acton Employer

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.gov_/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
___X4 e�
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS330004)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
'1 ry
May 12, 2011
Richard W. Fulford
VF Farms LLC
7123 Howard Ave t
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330004
VF Farms LLC
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear Richard W. Fulford:
In accordance with your April 28, 2011 Notification of Change of Ownership and request to change
operation type without increasing the permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Richard W. Fulford, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the VF Farms LLC, located in Edgecombe County, with a swine animal capacity of
no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: 15,580 Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS330004 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please Vgy careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mai! Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location:2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone:[phone] LFAX: 919-715-05881CustomerService: 1-877.623.6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www ncwaterquality.org �'}� li/��
An Equal Cpponunity t ARnmative Artion Employer � �/ `` �ra`

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition I1.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.pov/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
�a e�
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS330004)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

FAX COVER SHEET
Arl-n
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
�. AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N` DENK'
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mall Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
3 Pages, including cover sheet
TO:_iG�►a�
FROM: & s4e-'2 y- c'je- [ r
SUBJECT: !/. r-. r-W2.-a 1--L-C C CCa c
MESSAGE:
FAX: 9, --r-1 - -5-3 y - 19-5"0
DATE: -3 18 1 1
if you do not receive all pages, call 919, j91. 4200 or fax back to q 1 q - ?89- 7151
THE FAX NUMBER REMAINS THE SAME

NCDE-VR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
December 13, 2010
Mr. Richard 1~ ulford
7123 Howard Avenue Extension
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27801
Subject: Compliance Inquiry
Grant Farm Waste Lagoons
Permit No. AWS330004
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Fulford:
The Raleigh Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water
Quality has determined that the five (5) waste lagoons located on the subject swine farm
have had no Notice of Violations (NOVs) or compliance problems associated with the
lack of Freeboard for the past ten years. A record search was conducted back to the year
2000, and no problems were noted/
If you need any additional information please feel free to contact me at (919) 79-4200.
Sit el ,
Patrick Towell
Sr. Environmental Specialist
Cc: Edgecombe Soil & Water Conservation District
North ('arohna Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface'A'aler Protection
Intemet: www.ncwaterquality.ofg 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC' 27699-1628
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Onc
N)YhCarolina
�[ltllC[l��{J
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone] ('ustomer Service
FAX [phone].023.6748

.1.1 I4 0 A1,d4�13300-0 4
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Bunting Farms - Grant
C. B. Bunting
P 0 Box 336
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-827-4342
06-17-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Margaret Knight
Edgecombe SWCD
201 St. Andrew Street
POBox 10
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-641-7900
Dev/per 94nature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan. RECEIVED i DWR ; DWC
AQUIFFR*aRnrFrrinN qr-r-jCN
APR 03 7f11?9
Signature (owner} Date
a�
Signature (manager or produce Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: - -/, 11 // '
Tec cal S cialist Signd rle' Date
•----- •-- --
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed:'06-17-2003 Cover Page l

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S9
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid waste generated 3,632,202
gals/year by a 1,134 animal Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5605
Incorporated
9626
Injected
10601
Irrigated
6092
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
10,807.42
6,443,175
-2,810,973
-- ---- --------- - - ---- --- --- •---- - - - •- -
Note: Tn source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

0
0
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each Field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crop s Summ
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1083
2D
NIA
Aycock
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
50 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
10831
2E
NIA
Aycock
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
1083
2F
NIA
Aycock
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
1083
2G
NIA
Aycock
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
1083
4A
NIA
Aycock
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4 Tons
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
1083
4B
NIA
Aycock
Hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay
6.4 Tons
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
1083
4C
NIA
A cock
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4 Tons
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below
the root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< = 10
to soluble nutrient leaching
below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use
> 10
the root zone.
efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge
nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field
practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 PCS Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing
of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to
ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized. '
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual Soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient
application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to
prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
I Field
Source
LD.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA .
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
I N
ibs/A
1000
l/A I
tons
1000 is
tons
1083
2D
S9
Aycock
4,96
4.96
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
50 bu.
411-9/15
194
0
0
brig.
194
115.66
0
573.67
0.00
1083
2D
S9
Aycock
4-961
4.96
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-3/31
121
0
20
brig-
101
60.21
0
298.66
0.00
1083
2E
S9
Aycock
4.70
4.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
4/1-9/15
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
113-87
0
535.19
0.00
1083
2E
S9
Aycock
4.70
4.70
Wheat, Grain
59 bu-I
911-3/31
119
0
20
Irrig.
99
59-02
01
277.40
0.00
1083
2F
S9
Aycock
4.70
4.70
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
4/1-9/15
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
10-87
0
535.19
0.00
1083
2F
S9
Aycock
4.70
4.70
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
119
0
20
brig.
99
59.02
0
277.40
0.00
1083
2GI
S9
Aycock
2.06
2.06
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
411-9115
191
0
0
hrig.
191
113.87
0
234.57
0.00
1083
2G
S9
Aycock
2.06
2.06
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
119
0
20
brig.
99
59.02
0
121.59
0.00
1083
4A
S9
Aycock
5.23
5.23
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4 Tons
3/1-9/30
284
0
0
Irrig.
284
169.32
0
885.52
0.00
1083
4A
S9
Aycock
5.23
5.23
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
119
0
0
brig.
119
70.95
0
371.05
0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- -
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/17/03 WUT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
I Field
Source
1.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
l/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
1083
4B
S9
Aycock
4.75
4.75
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4 Tons
3/1-9/30
284
0
0
Irrig.
284
169.32
0
804.25
0.00
1083
4B
S9
Aycock
4.75
4.75
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
119
0
0
Irrig.
119
70.95
0
336,99
0,00
1083
4C
S9
Aycock
4.96
4.96
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4 Tons
3/1-9/30
284
0
0
Irrig.
284
169.32
0
839-80
0.00
1083
4C
S9
Aycock
4.96
4.96
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
119
01
0
brig.
119
70.95
0
351.89
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,443.18
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
3,632.20
Balance, 1000 gallons
-21810.97
Total Applied, tons
now
0-00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0-00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•I--------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/17/03 - WUT Page 2

0
The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate
varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not
result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field
selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any
one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(incheslhour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1083
2D
Aycock
0.35
1.00
1083
2E
Aycock
0.35
1.00
1083
2F
Aycock
0.35
1.00
1083
2G
Aycock
0.35
1.00
1083
4A
Aycock
0,35
1.00
1083
4H
Aycock
0.35
1.00
1083
4C
1 Aycock
1 0,351
1.00
--•---••----••---•---- -- ••- ------------------------- --------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 IAF Page I of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each
source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out,
this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is
nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally
very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and
lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
33.60
67.20
100.81
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
16.80
33.60
50.40
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
31.50
63.00
94.51
------------------------_-••-------...---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------...-----------------------------------------------------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 Sludge Page I of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste StnraLye Canacitv
Source Name Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
Design Stora a Capacity (Days)
Start Date 12)15
90
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
90
1
2
90
1
3
90
1
4
90
1
5
90
1
6
60
1
7
29
L
8
90
1
9
90
1
10
90
1
11
60
1
12
29
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
.. - •-------- - ----
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

•
Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
274514 Database Version 2.4 Date Printed: 6/17/03 Specification Page 1

0 0
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
--------------------- ------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/17/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/17/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of rive years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------.-----------------------------------------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 6/17/03 Specification Page 4

•
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4A, 4B, 4C
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Well Drained to Excessively Drained
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Sulfur will be needed on
deep sands with high leaching. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in
April and July. For established stands apply ISO to 240 lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in
April and following the first and second hay cuts. For better soils the N rate can be increased to 300
lb/ac. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and
Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional
agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2D, 2E, 2F, 2G, 4A, 4B, 4C
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area. Apply no
more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at
this time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March. The total N needed is dependent on the soil type. Apply sulfur at the rate of 5 lbs/acre at
planting and another 20 lbs/acre with the topdress N. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing
season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are
essential for profitable wheat production.
----------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ----------------------------------------
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 2

0 0
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2D, 2E, 2F, 2G
Soybeans -Full Season, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, highly leachable
The suggested planting dates for soybeans in the Coastal Plains are from April 20-May 20. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8"
drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"
rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and
adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be
broadcast or banded at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable soybean production.
274514 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 06-17-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

A4.
m

�'��
I 7 "1 F'i rr s �F � Y y�y'' r i t r• a i r }r �° ar rs � r i�' Yi j• ^t'y �`��7;
r i^4"C j4 { � � - � r i., n r 4 i, - L T } Y�. 'r�� �+...�F •,r'-�sls tri3 �� �f _+�.�
1,,
•r � k r r � +�•�r F Y r #,�T 7 4.# ' iWxiY�,�v"q- v � rl.�t o ���•�,}
hi:'"'jL;' _�Mi �• �; i�•�'i� 2 ty+c'Y�''/t� �F7.� C'r 1 '¢ r4 r t..t •; �.
yid �e r _ `�r �`l�.r � �}u�''e�, 7�� i:," "'fir !Tj'�f_ } �T•4 �i�� r,r� .
t 1 n a `,A a 't r!' t "`
{A t Yr
Cf fdY ,,a Sr tfGtaie n � _ : �i� oft, •v F� � ,r fY,r��F» e 1 y,��J
, tE as x'"
`;i •r i �;1y 1e�fsr /ra r x,r �Yf��i `mom � �r r 4i •' � f .,� �i4� +�� s + yY sr �� � � r ;i F � r � tj�..•
'! ,Y; �FY T, rt3 x Y*., )j, 9" # f"r$ n# ' ° }°•hZ'r1 hrt `�'wr� r�x{!� ? l + n. .r �"'y'.'�„""...n--*'t+.:.y,`.z J} � '"�-. it r i .i PJ�a i t w: � •! pt+�q r t� - It 41�ii.
� +� - � r .� � [r ~ i # Y' T. • + -, sea :� a'
-„� � �° .Ors � +,, � � 1 i.•c re - iYI A 5'�},, 1 i �r f�"" �t '.i.s - � �"4 i T� e" ,y.��RL k �,0'
44 .1i
{ itF Y��1, aI r}�t sr� r,,. �- } � � ..`•f'1r+ .h r$�9�. � t-�'".,�J;Ye i '. f �,�:Gk�J.�.�"TFd`t �3tffrJr- �'•!Y'i
"i+ i '`J " ; rl � ,.# 1 r � �'{, r � �i •+'i . #,r n � ' `� � 'Y�iq � r •�'•t �n � w. �TLi t �_i!Y
t � o „x• "! �3 rt�! aSl •7 `� fie' 'r 1 «, Y fZ� ! r� �• e� Y j r;
yr. / r r.' ` •.x F �, .. .tl _P`x, P .' ; xit
5y,7 w�lst
�Y = "Girt 7 � � r 'raw., sh q fi�,' �*-. ✓fit d� y a1 l� �rra a.�
i f l_ f 7 a ra rY «Ir S l
+ff �Y`f
p A r• i s7 } s` i" y aif
J� wn � �a Y �c it ,Jiro'`' :Jr:C441iy 1�J,:.• '. r rfi i r� # �+Y� •' 1ePrti.', {
tu
S i,%
7'. i ten
�
a�, 1' 'y S ,�lli ''e r i� �k.t �•.de > i , tr- F, Pr k� Y'S. ;ri a4 - ,�. .r.. r. �! It s � ` b a�-iF.14,
vu
•V,'��°°.i'afJ

33
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
"_fE'��.' RV120
Division of Water Quality PAN 1 0 N8
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) �o y �,„+ han�n �'�Filllttinc
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste OpO1FatYans
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: C. B. Bunting
1.3 Mailing address: Rt 1 Box 144-B
City, State: Pinetops NC T Zip: 27864
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-827-4342
1.4 County where facility is located: Edgecombe
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Location: State Road 1204 north rigz t side road,
south of Tarboro on 258, Sugg Crossroads, take right till come to 1204 take right.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/65
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 FacilityNo.: 33 (county number); 4 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description-- Swine operation
narrow to Wean
1134- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? [ "es; Rno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Beef
Farrow to Wean (# sow) Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 33 - 4

y 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): ^ 34 ; Required Acreage (as listed in.the AWMP): 19.4
2.4 Number o Iagoon torage ponds (circle which is applicable): r
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
(& or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? O1
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? Ol /D / %
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and 1
field locations where animal waste is land applied; �!
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management flan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the•following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 l Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 33 - 4

Facility Number: 33 - 4
Facility Name: Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Y 4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, C' 2, ;3 cl-;JL v� c, _ _ _ _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for &eald r l (Facility name listed in'question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is acturate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature Dates /
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFIC TION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for L (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 - Page 3 of 4 33 - 4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1/98)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee'
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven •
Pesqubtaak
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford '
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC'28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore .
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 4 of 4

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification RECEIVED
(Please type or print all information that does not require a -signature) WMER QU�U Y 8EC ION
General Information: ','on -Discharge Permitting
Name of Farm: &Nn r se L�KM<, _ (GV\0-t Y UY, Facility No: - y
Owners) Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address: Va, t Ucx NL- - a ­�LrL S .1 tiL 2_7t --
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:_ 0 3 o Zo iy 3 O 1 00, -
Latitude and Longitude: �`i' Si'� I 1�c �� r �+ I " County: C�wvti�f
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): �� ,, �.� Ner�j� i� �� l 3 f n s k C:' ,'_
Sl'L 17-u`4.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean 1 I
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle
❑ Dairy
❑ Beef
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available' for Application: '311. o Required Acreage: R `i
Number off—agoons % torage Ponds : 'b Total Capacity:- 513Li, 3? Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that aN the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste =tment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Own
Signature:. r^�_ _ Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24, 1996 1

Technical Specialist Certif, —ition
As a technical specialis, ;signated by the North Carol:. -,a Soil and Water Conservation Commission
-
pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste -management system for the farm
named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications
of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the ; -
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical
specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only
certify parts for which they are technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment SystQm
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with
waste utilization requirements.
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems,
Iagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and
specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):��r_3
Affiliation: NRCS
Address(Agency):_ P. o• �,� _lam TA2aL,2,—_v
Signature: U
ate:
B) Land Al2pligation Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):3 u)-r_E� TIE
Affiliation: ni GCS
Address (Agency):--u 36� TF 3 f\,)c- a7,76e ); 2 Phone No.:
Signature: . _ -- _ Date: S% 2g2�
C) Rljnof[ ontfols from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
21 Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
designed in accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ t_V-i A RL
Affiliation: cS
Address(Agency):_ �7Phone No.: 1111 la (�
Signature: Date: 5 3d 7
AWC -- April 24, 1996

4
D) Applirkation and HandlingEquipment
Check the appropriate box
' r
Ei Existing facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
- necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established'required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan). .
❑ New or expanded faciIit • or existing facility without existing waste application equipment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained_ as part of the
plan). ,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency):_ 11, .16 _Phone No.:
Signature: LR L, �• . rr,(,4�., Date:G%'Gi
-•�1.:.,: ,..'��i a�2 .C.2'l.Ctf tt. ��-� .t:.-i.[aL,~7-.G� /?l`Z•{c%�' C.' r<=��-.r.,S-1-r,q..��'2t�7vt. (:tea-,.r,r`I-�.t.7 ,,C.��'/L�t-v�- . ���-'=/-
., �: �. /2.�{2.Gw �f.:. ..[!-��-=j--�_�[ �G'lL•�. �c,�..:: 1.."C Ct. .,t �_ ii-.'l..%'�:'.c/,:LC•'.cti -.G. ��'..�•I.: ..La.'L �J .�!T_t'iz1i.:'.c.���!
III. Certification of Installation ✓ ��t�� ,fiGt
A) Qgllgrlign,��Jgraae, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24, 1996

B) Land Auplicalion Site (WUP) '
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the
cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the
owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by
(month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the waste
utilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared
land within 30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim
crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency):- _ � . o . 3, e� 1 Q Nt•- ,D-;686 Phone No.: (17 4 to q- ,7'16c)
Signature: Date: 5%2 9&9 7. _
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste
utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to
DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date
specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to Submit this verification is a
violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls From Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of 7/7
lounging and heavy use areas have been
installed as specified in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):__
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature:_ ` _ ,,. _ , _ _ Date: -__
AWC -- April 24, 1996

D) Annlication and Handling Eauinment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
0 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approvalAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as pan of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ I rL&—� , .
Affiliation:_
Address{Agency}:�� I 1 i1„ ;���- ;� C.t���:� G, Phone No.
Signature: �' Date: 5" <' `%_ 7_
�.syy7fu,�'f to �aC'... . � .f�.' �,c�, r � CLvr� �'� •-� t.a -cs� GJ.PC .E�� �x. ti. .«st, r�-�uT� �i=� .1 ;, .,�r'.�r• (c1a_�.�.
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- April 24, 1996

,. TECHNICAL SPECIALIST FOR ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
DESIGNATION CATEGORY
CODE
AREA OF AUTHORITY
Collection, Storage,
SD (design)
- lagoons, storage ponds, dry stacks, storage structures,
and/or Treatment
SI (installation)
composters, pushoff ramps, curbing and other similar
structures
Waste Utilization Plan
WUP
- design and installation (development and
implementation) of land application plans
including crop and acreages available to meet nutrient
budget, hydraulic and nutrient loading rates, placement
of application site buffers
- measurement of existing storage volume
- confirmation of existence and compatibility of land
application equipment with waste utilization plan
- c^_rtification of cropping systems
- confirmation of absence of exterior lots
- confirmation of sludge and effluent removal and
application at agronomic rates for lagoon closure
Runoff Controls
RC
- design and installation of filter strips, grass
channels, and related bmps used to reduce runoff from
exterior lots (primarily dairy operations)
Irrigation Equipment
I
- design and installation of irrigation systems to
include pipe size, pump horsepower, nozzle size, system
layout, thrust blocks, etc. and operation plan to meet
criteria of Waste Utilization Plan (hours per set, etc.)
Technical Specialists are designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F.0005.
Technical Specialists should only certify parts of a plan for which they are technically competent.

20
• 1 1; t r
FOX 1104 ! y \
.F; (0 - i '
ttt
'71
It T •. v-' 6 1, . i
'-
Y
30 s �'
30
36.0
35.5 , 1I �Opi/ r ` J i y �� g0 19
It
30-
69
30
jI!! I"CO
cis+ . • . R A �-r .
168
it 33.
I ri avist0 ,5.537 BM
10
32 ' Ir
Gem 1200{/t83s G Broads �, J
)
61
Grace Chepd: j. _
603
0
r•. • V v
(160

UNITED STATES Natural County Agriculture Building
DEPARTMENT OF Resources 403 Government Circle, Suite 4
AGRICULTURE Conservation Greenville, NC 27834
Service Phone: [phone]
SUBJECT: 0200 Lagoon Date: September 30, 1996
Bunting Farms (Grant)
1134 Farrow To Weanling
To: Archie B. Whitley, III
District Conservationist
USDA- NRCS
Tarboro, NC 27886-0010
I have done a detailed evaluation of Bunting Farms swine
operation lagoon for 1134 Sows Farrow To Weanling. This
operation is not a true 1134 Sows Farrow to Weanling, the
following is a break down of animals on farm. 1139 Sows @ 400
pounds, 61 Boars @ 450 pounds, 1363 Pigs @ 6 pounds. This total
will equal 1134 Sows Farrow To Weanling. The existing lagoons
exceed the requirements for capacity and only needs some
maintenance improvements. The following is a list of work that
needs to be completed in order for a Technical Specialist to do a
Technical Certification on this operation which is required by
law to be done prior to December 31, 1997.
ITEMS OF WORK
1: Maintain the existing dikes around lagoons 1, 2 and 3 to a
top elevation of 49.5 feet or higher. The top width should be
maintained to a 10-12 foot top. The outside side slopes should
be maintained with a 3.0:1 side slope.
2: Maintain the existing dikes around lagoon 4 and 5 to a top
elevation of 45.0 feet or higher. The top width should be
maintained to a 10-12 foot top. The outside slopes should be
maintained with a 3.0:1 side slope.
3: Install a minimum diameter 10 inch PVC pipe at or below
elevation 46.3 feet to transfer waste between lagoons 1, 2 and 3.
See site map for locations.
4: Install a minimum diameter 10 inch PVC pipe at elevation 42.1
feet to transfer waste from lagoon 5 to lagoon 4. See site map
for location.

5: Construct waterways and diversions as shown on site map to
remove surface water away from lagoons and off site.
6: Inspect buildings, flush tanks, pipes, etc. to make sure
there are no leaks and repair according.
7: Remove solids from lagoons 1 and 2 to restore the needed
depth. See site map for elevations.
8: Replace outlet pipe from swine house B to lagoon 1, use PVC
schedule 40 with 6 inch minimum diameter.
9: There are several items that need to be corrected on or
around swine house A. Install roof gutters to remove roof water
away from lagoons. Maintain the concrete flush trough by
cleaning out, raise the outside block walls of trough to
elevation 49.5 feet or higher. Replace all outlet pipes to
lagoon. Remove the concrete that is on the ground between the
house and lagoon. Maintain the dikes to planned elevation. See
plan maps for details.
10: All cattle will need to be removed from site or fenced off
lagoons and vegetated areas to protect grass. It may be
necessary to fence a walk way for the cattle to move through the
area without causing damage to the vegetation.
11: Vegetate all disturbed areas according to NRCS
specifications.
12: There is a earth island in lagoon 3 that needs to be
removed. See plan map for location.
13: All collection boxes at end of swine houses will need to be
at or above the top elevation of the dike.
14: Develop Emergency Action Plan for this operation. A sample
copy of a EAP is enclosed, if you choose to use this one the
phone numbers and etc. will need to be filled in.
15: Develop a waste Utilization Plan to proper apply the waste
at agronomic rates to a crop or pasture. This plan will be based
on a 90 day pumping cycle. Be sure to use the areas Capability
and Realistic Yields chart in developing this plan. See the
typical section on the drawing sheet for management elevations of
the lagoon. At some point it will become necessary to remove
some solids (sludge) from the lagoon. The sludge should be

agitated and applied at agronomic rates. This will require
additional land that is not set aside for waste application.
The above items are minimum work to be done in order for a
Technical Specialist to do a Technical Certification on this
operation which is required by law to be done prior to December
31, 1997.
This evaluation is based on steady state _live weight of 489,290
pounds.
If you have questions or I can be of assistance in any way please
let me know. If necessary I will schedule time to review this
plan with you and your staff along with the owner prior to
starting any construction.
aa44Z ///' 4
Claude M. Long
Civil Engineering Technician

The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine waste
management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: FESCUE is being established on these areas. Beginning
in 1996 and each year thereafter, the embankment should be
fertilized with 800 pounds of 10--10-10 per acre to maintain a
vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made at least
annually. Items to be checked should include, as a minimum, the
following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes
a. separation of joints
b. cracks or breaks
C. accumulation of salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2. Lagoon surface
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. wet or damp areas on the back slope
d. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave
action
e. rodent damage
1

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
4. Transfer Pump - recycling and irrigation pumps
a. overall pump operation
b. leaks
C. loose fittings
5. Surface water diversion
a. adequate vegetation
b. diversion capacity
C. ridge berm height
B. Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total steady
live weight of 489,290 pounds. The lagoon contains both permanent
and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be pumped in
order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The design
includes permanent storage of 0.67 cubic foot per pound of steady
state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste produced over 90 days, the amount of rainfall in a 25
year 24 hour storm event plus and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for 90 days of temporary storage;
therefore., it will need to be pumped every three months. Begin pump -
out of the lagoons 1,2,3 when fluid level reaches elevation 47.9 feet
as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level
reaches elevation 46.3 feet. Begin pump out of lagoons 4,5 when
fluid level reaches elevation 43.2 feet as marked by permanent
markers. Stop pump -out when fluid level reaches elevation 42.1 feet.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such
as weather runoff or leaching. See detail drawing for a better
understanding of managing the pumping range.
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to insure the waste
is applied_ as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be precharged with a volume of water
equal to one-half of the treatment volume before wastes are,
introduced. Precharing reduces the concentration of the initial

waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush water and
irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below the surface and as
far from the inlet pipes as possible in order to provide a cleaner
effluent for flushing and to reduce odors when irrigating on land.
When these pipes are placed through the embankment, they should be
compacted with clay material.
After five years the waste treatment lagoon must be checked for
sludge accumulation annually. If sludge had encroached into the
treatment volume, the sludge must be removed and applied at agronomic
rates based on analysis of the sludge. Treatment volume must have a
minimum of 4 feet of depth free of sludge at all times.•.
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) in
North Carolina revised water quality regulations that address animal
operations. These rules became effective on February 1, 1993 (15A
NCAC 2H .0200). This animal operation shall be operated within the
requirements of these rules and regulations.
3

E:
THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE SWINE LAGOON
CLIENTS
COUNTY
TODAYS
SITING
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NAME------------------------=->
DATE
LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) =>
OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH =======>
OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER =----==>
OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
OF DEVELOPING GILTS
OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS >
OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
(5 year minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =------===>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 6.0
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth of sludge = 2 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 341896.8
Permanent Volume Provided 419688.0
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED) =_=>
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON-VEGET.) =_>
.(i.e. feedlot & non -diverted area)
ADDITIONAL D. A. WITH EVAPORATION =====>
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE =====>
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS =--==>
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =-----------==>
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O)======>
FREEBOARD
Bunting (Grant) Lagoon 1,2,3
Edgecombe County
September 29,1996
Yes
0
0
940
0
0
0
0
5
750.0
FEET
100.0
FEET
46.3
FEET
46.3
FEET
40.3
FEET
feet
1.0:1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
90 DAYS
10.2 INCHES
30 PERCENT
65 PERCENT
4.9 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0 (NUMBER ONLY)
1.0 FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION =-----==> 49.5 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 161578.8 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 169128.2 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation =
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at
Length = 756.4 feet Width =
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP =
Volume To Be Pumped =
Volume for Estimated Depth =
Begin Pumping Elevation =
Stop Pumping Elevation =
49.5 feet
Top of Dam
106.4 feet
1.6 FEET
116644 cubic feet
122181 cubic feet
47.9 feet
46.3 feet

0
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
head
weanling to feeder
x 30 lbs. =
0
lbs
`- 0
head
feeder to finishing x 135 lbs. -
0
lbs
940
sows
farrow to weanling
x 433 lbs. =
407020
lbs
0
sows
farrow to feeder x
522 lbs. -
0
lbs
0
sows
farrow to finish x
1417 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
developing gilts x 150
lbs. =
0
lbs
0
stud
boars or gestating
sows =
0
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) - 407020 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge
accumulates at varying rates.
0
pounds
weanling to feeder x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
feeder to finishing x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
407020
pounds
farrow to weanling x 0.17 =
69193.4
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to feeder x 0.17 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to finish x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
of developing gilts x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of
boar studs or gest. sows * 0.125=
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL SLUDGE ACCUMULATION = 69193 cu. ft.
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design Treatment Volume varies by animal type.
0 pounds weanling to feeder x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0 pounds feeder to finishing x 1.0 -
0
cu.
ft.
407020 pounds farrow to weanling x 0.67 =
272703.4
cu.
ft.
0 pounds farrow to feeder x 0.67
0
cu.
ft.
0 pounds farrow to finish x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0 pounds of developing gilts x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0 lbs. of boar studs or gent, sows * 1 =
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME REQUIRED FOR LAGOON =
272703
cu.
ft.
TOTAL VOLUME FOR TREATMENT AND SLUDGE -
341896.8
cu.
ft.
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 46.3 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 40.3 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH =
750.0 100.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb -
738.0 88.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) _
744.0 94.0
75000.0 (AREA OF TOP)
64944.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
69936.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)

• CU. YD. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
75000.0 279744.0 64944.0 1.000
5. DAM
VOLUME OF LAGOON'AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL=19688.0 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 341896.8 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 750.0 FEET LONG BY 100.0 FEET WIDE
Place spoil as a continuous dam to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dam)
Length * Width -
756.4 106.4 80481 square feet
Additional Drainage Area Without Evaporation
Vegetated 0 square feet
Non -Vegetated 0 square feet
Additional Drainage Area With Evaporation
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 80481 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 90 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
0 head weanling to feeder x 0.5 gals/day -
0 head feeder to finishing x 2.3 gals/day =
940 sows farrow to weanling x 7.2 gals/day =
0 sows farrow to feeder x 8.0 gals/day W
0 sows farrow to finish x 23.0 gals/day -
0 developing gilts x 2.5 gals/day =
0 stud boars or gest. sows x 6.7 gals/day =
49.5 feet.
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
6768 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE = 6768 gals/day
Volume = 6768 gals/day * 90 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 81433.2 cubic feet
6B. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) =
5.2 inches
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 35210.4 cubic feet

6C. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 44935.2 cubic feet
6D'. Volume of "Heavy Rain"
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 81433.2 cubic feet
6B. 35210.4 cubic feet
6C. 44935.2 cubic feet
6D. 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 161578.8 cubic feet
7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
VOLUME OF TEMPORARY STORAGE WHEN TOP OF DAM IS 49.5 FEET ELEV.
AREA OF BOTTOM = 75000.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 78759.4 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 76874.8 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 169128.2 cubic feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 49.5 FT.
ARE 756.4 FEET BY 106.4 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 81433.2 cubic feet
6B. 35210.4 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 116643.6 cubic feet
VOLUME AT ESTIMATED PUMPING DEPTH
AREA OF BOTTOM = 75000.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 77730.2 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID --SECTION = 76362.6 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 122181.5 cubic feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:

il
r
THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE SWINE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME ___----_-----------------=>
COUNTY
TODAYS DATE
SITING LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) =>
NUMBER OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH =----==>
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
NUMBER OF DEVELOPING GILTS
NUMBER OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS >
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
(5 year minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =------===>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 6.0
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth of sludge = 2 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 69106.8
Permanent Volume Provided 164664.0
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED) W=->
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON-VEGET.)
(i.e. feedlot & non -diverted area)
ADDITIONAL D. A. WITH EVAPORATION
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O)
FREEBOARD
Bunting (Grant) Lagoon 4,5
Edgecombe County
September 29,1996
Yes
0
0
190
0
0
0
0
5
514.0
FEET
60.0
FEET
42.1
FEET
42.1
FEET
36.1
FEET
feet
1.0:1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
90 DAYS
10.2 INCHES
30 PERCENT
65 PERCENT
4.9 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0 (NUMBER ONLY)
1.0 FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION =======> 45.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 50520.2 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 60677.3 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation =
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of
Length = 519.8 feet Width =
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP =
Volume To Be Pumped =
Volume for Estimated Depth =
Begin Pumping Elevation =
Stop Pumping Elevation =
45.0 feet
Dam
65.8 feet
1.1 FEET
31424 cubic feet
34620 cubic feet
43.2 feet
42.1 feet

1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
head weanling to feeder x 30 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
head feeder to finishing x 135 lbs. =
0
lbs
190
sows farrow to weanling x 433 lbs. =
82270
lbs
0
sows farrow to feeder x 522 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
sows farrow to finish x 1417 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
developing gilts x 150 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
stud boars or gestating sows =
0
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) =
82270
lbs
2. SLUDGE
ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at varying rates.
0
pounds weanling to feeder x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds feeder to finishing x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
82270
pounds farrow to weanling x 0.17 =
13985.9
cu.
ft.
0
pounds farrow to feeder x 0.17 W
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds farrow to finish x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds of developing gilts x 0.25 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of boar studs or gest. sows * 0.125=
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL SLUDGE ACCUMULATION =
13986
cu.
ft.
3. REQUIRED
LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design Treatment Volume varies by animal type.
0
pounds weanling to feeder x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds feeder to finishing x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
82270
pounds farrow to weanling x 0.67 =
55120.9
cu.
ft.
0
pounds farrow to feeder x 0.67 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds farrow to finish x 1.0 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds of developing gilts x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of boar studs or gest. sows * 1 =
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME REQUIRED FOR LAGOON -
55121
cu.
ft.
TOTAL VOLUME FOR TREATMENT AND SLUDGE =
69106.8
cu.
ft.
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 42.1 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 36.1 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2
1.0 1.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH =
514.0 60.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
502.0 48.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
( Lm * Wm) _
508.0 54.0
SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
1.0 1.0 6.0
30840.0 (AREA OF TOP)
24096.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
27432.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)

5. DAM
CU. YD. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
30840.0 109728.0 24096.0 1.0.00
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL=64664.0 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 69106.8 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 514.0 FEET LONG BY 60.0 FEET WIDE
Place spoil as a continuous dam to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dam)
Length * Width =
519.8 65.8 34203 square feet
Additional Drainage Area Without Evaporation
Vegetated 0 square feet
Non -Vegetated 0 square feet
Additional Drainage Area With Evaporation
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 34203 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 90 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
0 head weanling to feeder x 0.5 gals/day =
0 head feeder to finishing x 2.3 gals/day =
190 sows farrow to weanling x 7.2 gals/day =
0 sows farrow to feeder x 8.0 gals/day =
0 sows farrow to finish x 23.0 gals/day =
0 developing gilts x 2.5 gals/day =
0 stud boars or gest. sows x 6.7 gals/day =
45.0 feet.
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
1368 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE = 1368 gals/day
Volume = 1368 gals/day * 90 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 16459.9 cubic feet
6B. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) =
5.2 inches
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 14963.7 cubic feet

�..a.
�-

6C. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 19096.6 cubic feet
6D. Volume of "Heavy Rain"
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 16459.9 cubic feet
6B. 14963.7 cubic feet
6C. 19096.6 cubic feet
6D. 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 50520.2 cubic feet
7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
VOLUME OF TEMPORARY STORAGE WHEN TOP OF DAM IS 45.0 FEET ELEV.
AREA OF BOTTOM = 30840.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 33035.6 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 31934.2 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 60677.3 cubic feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 45.0 FT.
ARE 519.8 FEET BY 65.8 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 16459.9 cubic feet
6B. 14963.7 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 31423.6 cubic feet
VOLUME AT ESTIMATED PUMPING DEPTH
AREA OF BOTTOM = 30840.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 32107.6 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 31472.6 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 34620.3 cubic feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:

WASTE .......... ............ .................UTI.............. . .LI.. .... ....ZA.. I ........TION PLAN
........ ...................................
Producer: _3u (on►J(f' )41/ns ' `GQ,9Al-t
Location: V% /))ILE ND�i� i OL J�/e 1�D3 �ifST OF S/2 /ZD y
Telephone: C9/9) 827- 41.3V2
Type Operation: 5w„v6 P444eaw ra wc-fiN
Number of Animal Units: // 34 Se"is
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields -where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.
Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can
be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan
in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that
it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based
on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can. utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons
per acre per year. with special precautions, waste may be applied to land
eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid
drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than
30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be
based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility.
Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets, the requirements for
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management
Commission
a111—P CK

...................
.......... ................
.............. ....................... *
.......................... ................... ................
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(g_allons, tons,etc.)
SbNs
113q animals X 3203 gal. waste/animal/year = 3i G3z, 202 gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen _(PAN) Produced Per Year
113y animals X -5'J1 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 4012-`/ lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
Farms
Total
wAcopn �2ZG
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996,, the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
un't tis o� n t Ito 5t n nMr�S 6,
NOTE: �Z wt b,will q -3ac
PeYa�dt f-G[ s,Z*-,�a b`F rQ m
P raaptoucScod
uc. 5 Sn.S
A his r1tiLa-r6 a([ 6-C 4Rz(ds 2 c 4 will v►-" 40 6�
ScCdtd +o y4iK a,,4 `f Is ['6k1`t-Ct Cud 4i .
6e planted 4" &4=ger- io6acco., Cbrrs; Y;4j A/
►� t�s � � slxk-ter, 'n Tab/e ems` / ,

................................................................................ ...................................................................................................................................................................
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
........ ......... ...............
...:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, tons etc.
,fie as
1/3q animals X 37-v3 gal. waste/animal/year =3, 432, 202 gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitro en PAN Produced Per Year
113y animals X 5*4 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 4/2y lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop ' Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type ' Per Ac.* Utilized Application
IWOMW
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996, the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: 't'�� wi nt('Y 9�uos-�cr wi 1) r-$LW rc. 3b acr�5 s►�.a-Vt gv Lti wt So
u�i�4s a�' ntiYo�[n �r Uacrc. 4u a�SPosc of +ke- 531 Urw+s or3 pre>'JuceJ
a�r�+`� `ih[S �tr�bcQ `T�iS YY��anS alI 8�' rctt(ds 2 Y)e_L4 �6 bt
Scedtd +t> Spa It ykt4, and? `i-tli's rC.1-4 4Y �-.�

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
*See footnote for Table I.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 (o S •3
Table 2
Total 31.
Amount of N Produced (,I2q. o
[3eficit 134. S
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich
and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of
nutrients or other elements. -
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste
wat,�r. .

WASTEUTILIZATION PLAN.... ............ ..... .... ............................ ...... ................... -- ............................ ....... -- ....................... ..................... ........................
................. I-- ................................... ......
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.)
r / D
2, y
�L 4
$1 rm d rasS
u., y �, Rye-
o. 3 5
�.
This table is nat needed if waste is nut being applied by irrigntion, however a siurilar table will be needed for dry litter or slu{lye.
Your facility is designed for '9o days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every Arco rAAn-J s.
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
exceed FEET BELOW THE LOWEST POINT IN THE DIKE.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
Narrative of operation:
hL bVe-r s U d e cp
-IV Can vc.+•r-h*o,, «
,'A CoaJva-/
ea,A fear
9-aiL,
Crops
62C4 5'e�.
erMc3iL4a GrarS V 's y r e"lc� •,!i 6/
L (d z wi %/ be plcsP

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written
agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for
the life expectancy of the production facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization. Flan when there is a change in the operation, increase
in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application of other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more
tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that grassfilter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard
393 - Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated sails; during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crops planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any
perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch'or canal).
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial
waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a
land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should
not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall beapplied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation
such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution
and erosion.

WASTE................. .....................UTILIZATION PLAN
...................................................................
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption it should be applied preplant
with no further applications of animal waste during the cropping season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment
lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage
volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and -soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -- determining element. Zinc and copper levels
in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used
when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records
shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records
shall be maintained for three years. Waste application records for all
other waste shall be maintained for five (a) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North carolina
regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: _ PQAL j ,hQm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design .capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand ,that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-
hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on --site at the farm office and
at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of FacilikT)Owner: („Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager (If different from owner:"
Signature:
Date: � zyf
Date:
Technical Representative: (Please print) A.~3 Wit La" ,fit- _
Affiliation: Nz'CS
Address (Agency) : ->. o10
Signature:
Ot � 13, O.L Wd"
Date : 5/ 3611�%

14,
SL
00
Nkf

w
7
-t l� ;y � � �. a: r;:n•.��..,.,;���._ - - - :_I � �.,�. -V:K�r. - Y a ... � f•r�� w{�;.G�: �ti, r ;r7wa. ��'1';^'�. �►,.''�?�=_. --•���:�
-:. - t ✓ riy�= 'si�:l•_, -:i '�lfT 7 Jay-S.'. +:t'_ ` a�.WN.Y�
� ' 1 f • , �4' � .�{` ('� # "i: i. S.:r:�.:�Y�.-,n•.:i�! .. : y�<s i'k� y! :_.. � ��,: •;�., ... ��
ti .r.�; . ���� f� '•��1 �!r�L: i�Si•rr�
�• ' a � �.. ^�iS�M;'t�.r �.] _ y;� �, �,_ - ;•fit.
IL
MIr
kill
VC
• � •:% per._ �� . ♦rt: r 't: '. .. -_ `..
(• - - .._t-C• i- � wY, •7: `�'�, ,gip (•.? -t .
, #�. t� �" 2." •-i�s.t �_ •�_ •-awY F-.•atis..� ia7��i.1C:„+:��. "' _ � � .��, .-:•,�.`••.•�- ,: �.-.
.gar.: yy - Sy _ �. >-: h,K - :' ��s ►' 1', a . - _ ..
INC kr ,Y+ Ste ' "'Y `y • }
s �+ T .., ! Y _ •,� t . iry . %)sl � `Y'ir ,fir.}.. *::. •. _io e +

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: - -i fict RxrMS
Address: 6.rcer-130
Ba x )dA lb
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications'
County:
Date: e rT
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(•/.)
crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate 4
(inlhr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle4
(inches)
Comments
r
3
1?
•.
r v a Re
35
o
Zea
G
-35
Z-•q�o
YY"it R� 1jr^t,,,li S v'=taIi4J3tl
'Table to be completed in its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s). JUN 1998
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
`Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section 11 G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
J
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
October 1996 page-1 North Carolina

riPC+r?c;
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: 1 �7 n f
ODDS LI-02e,-& /C�'O/'� Wlb', /-h% 150 6c,/) Q17d
Field No'
and
Hydrant No'
Travel
Speed
(ftlmin)
Application
Rate
(inlhr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (ft) Length (ft)
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
EQUIPMENT SETTiNOs
Nozzle Operating Operating M N f Mo
Diameter Pressure Pressure Are
(inches) @ Gun (psi) @ Reel (psi) Patterns
(%,
Comments <
OCR
13 el, 9�-
so v
-Z� a�
�. 1300
t I�
�'
D I
� uv
?CCU
-i
1
0 � S te'
-=
I
i
.
'ol S� I
�f=
J��C�
9y
-qCG i
_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
i
'See attached map provided by the Field Qifice for field location(s).
'Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in degrees.
`ion Parameters
er 1995
P.
USDA-Nr
North C.
N, r r
3a._,
3

'ion Parameters
er 1995
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
f ! O
Design Precipitation Rate (inch►)
�! i
Hose Length (feet)
�'
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
C'C/C4�
I XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Enftne, Electric)
i e
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications'
Designer may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.)
90' Bend
.'
Dead End
i cc
7
rau c)
GG ?G
�%
t See USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Pra&ice Code 430-DD.
P.
USDA-Nr
North C.

Name:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
l . A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
b. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA -MRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the
designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval
of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip �- feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DERNR•DEM Code Section 15A NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.
fon Parameters
er 1995
P.
USDA-Nr
North C.

REVELLE AGRI PRODUCTS, INC.
P.O. BOX 68
508 WEST BROAD STREET
MURFREESBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27855
TELEPHONE [phone]
NARRATIVE OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM OPERATION
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a
similar sheet most convenient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization, and regular
maintenance of all equipment.
This irrigator is designed to apply , M of water at specified ratings. Pump
should be primed and started and 1SIOPT traveling hose should be extended to
specific destinations in accordance with map. The reel should be started in
manner that is given in owner's manual that accompanies the machine. The
machine is equipped with shutoff system, so there is no harm done to the machine
itself. The irrigator should only be run in accordance with the waste management
plans and to the specifications of this design.
Winterization should be done when the machine will be shut down for more
than a month at a time, during the winter season. All water should be drained
and machine should be greased and oiled.
Regular checks should be made on the reel, hose, and all mechanical
equipment on the machine itself.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
C.B. Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Rt 1 Box 144-B
Pinetops NC 27864
Dear C.B. Bunting:
1 " •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July21, 1998 RECEIVED
WATER OUALITY SECMN
JUL ?. 81998
Subject: Applica 'i� EMMIling
Additional Information Request
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the
subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please
address the following by August 20, 1998:
,A) As required by item 3.3.12 of the Non -Discharge Permit Application Form for Genga.l
Permit- Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations, please submit the Insect Contro
Checklist for this facility.
As required by item 3.3.13 of the Non -Discharge Permit Application Form for General
Permit- Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations, please submit the Odor Control
Checklist for this facility.
J3) As required by item 3.3.14 of the Non -Discharge Permit Application Form for General
Permit- Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations, please submit the Mortality Control
Checklist for this facility.
LA) The irrigation parameters listed in your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) exceed current
NRCS recommendations. Irrigation events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum
application allowable for that soil type from the time the pumps are turned on until the time
they are shut off. The application events listed in your WUP appear to be out of the:..
,Sprin.kler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide have not been
adjusted for the application of animal waste. NRCS currently recommends that total
application amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any 'soil type. If your
application rates need to be adjusted for the application of animal waste, please have your
Technical Specialist revise your WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per
event. If the rates exceed the recommended one inch, please have your Technical.
Specialist justify the increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before August 20,
1998 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 33-0004
C.B. Bunting
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension
362.
Sincerely,
r v I
Michael T. Lewandowski, PE
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
............................................................................. 1-1.1-- ........ -11.11.1 ........ ......................................................... ...... ................................................................................ I ...........
Producer: 'BuNr,+J(f, F►9-ievn5 "GleAAlt F,4)em "
Location: �lz mlLE iVoRJ-Al aF 5102 1603 41;�IS7" o5,,e /Zo y
Telephone: (9/I) 927- 413512
Type Operation: swi.v8 P74,CRaw To WC-6w
Number of Animal Units: I/34 'Sauss
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields -where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.
Annual soil tests are.strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can
be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan
in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that
it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based
on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons
per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land
eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters.- Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid
drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than
30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be
based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility.
Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management
Commission
OW W"P ACK

:....._............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. :
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, tons etc.
SeNs '
113y animals X'3203 gal. waste/animal/year - 3, 432, 202 gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen PAN Produced Per Year
113y animals X -•� lbs. PAN/animal/year lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633 )
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1.: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
©�i
PEIr•
: • •
_,
�ar����■r
�r-�r
,
Total 31• �5 (4.)56-ST
wA?2�G
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic vield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996,' the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: 'j'h� Wj rntLr ua-&cr Wily Y�q car re. 3o aer�S 0{ S►xabt o�rue� ah 50
b D o N ro�ceJ
ur,',#s o�' nt�o5[n per acre. -++� d�sQosc. �f �-hc. 153f U�i,Es � P
a�Lrl*`S `+hiS pCr�bcQ .
i5 rku�nS 0.(i 0{' -GZ(cls 2 14
will nG��f do �t
5cedcd +v 5rr,C.tr gr4ih. andl 'Hii's
F,'eld-4-4 cv;t/ be pldn-A- rat) 04-iP s ,bciL�0j (35 �, /ryes, or72�u-ls ��i Al

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, tons etc.
Seals -
11y1 animals X 3293 gal. waste/animal/year = 3i432, 202 gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
11'5y animals X .•4 lbs. PAN/animal/year lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type ' Per Ac.* Utilized Application
MTV
•i
m
• L
M ►
•
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996, the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: 'j'�t W,rntf-r ya-r-Vtr Will `(t9DLLt'rC- 3C, 0,crt5 p 5rx" yvj� ti oh So
per acrc.. � diSPosZ of +ke- ! 531 c�nivFs a� N Proolucc�P
��r�r`C lS �Crt lS 1�hLo►►S 0�11 6-� -G (efx 2 4 wilj Yle.L4 do. b�
5cc cnQJ -Iv 5 11 r 4i h a n (0 is r r,&)" C.u'* -;r

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
*See footnote for Table 1.
Tota'1s from above Tables
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
5 ..5
Table 2
Total
31•
Amount of
N Produced
41��.a
Def icit
134.5
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich
and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of
nutrients or other elements.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste
water.

WASTEUTILIZATION PLAN. .................. ..................................... ..................... ............................................................. ..................... - ...... I-- ......
...................................... I ......................
Application of waste by irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate.(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.)
r / 0
2, Al
�.L 4
$[ aril . rals
U,� y 1, e-
0 3 5-.
f/
This table Is not needed if weste is uo1 being applied by irrigation, however a sinulaf [able will be needed fOr dry Illlef Of Sludge.
Your facility is designed for 9 o days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every Arcs mAhyl+s.
In no instance should the volume of waste being stored'in your structure.
exceed FEET BELOW THE LOWEST POINT IN THE DIKE.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after
you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
Narrative of Operation:
be- twe.r 5 u d e c�
4V Can VC.n-h or -,q
tb .SrncZI/
I
C154Ya,"
eacA yf4r
Crops
g,a<` cQC4
Je.rrnoda (vra,fS /�?1's re-ld -ji 6/
tier (d Z w, // be- pla---c-d
£ ova r5Gc,,Pc
of; Se &Pcd

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. 1
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written
agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for
the life expectancy of the production facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase
in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application of other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more
tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that grassfilter
strips are installed where runoff leaves. the field. (See FOTG Standard
393 - Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crops planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any
perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch -or canal).
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial
waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right--of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a
land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should
not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall beapplied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation
such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution
and erosion.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
............................. ............................ -- .................................................................... ........................................................ ......................................... .............. .......
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
.used on crops for direct human consumption it should be applied preplant
with no further applications of animal waste during the cropping season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment
lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage
volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and,soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied,
Nitrogen shall be the rate — determining element. Zinc and copper levels
in the soils shall he monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used
when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records
shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records
shall be maintained for three years. waste application records for all
other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North carolina
regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: REaNy -ip7Aerr1__
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design .capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) before the new. animals are stocked. I (we) also understand .that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-
hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and
at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Faci1i#f�Owner: (.,Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager (If
Signature:
ferent from owner:
Date: � / f
Date:
Technical Representative: (Please print) w1A TL
Affiliation: NRCS
Address (Agency) : 1�. C) +3c>� 10
Signature:_ l , � � .�� Date:— S3-f /9%

t4
. A

V.7
�YE;
Vi
t
Sj
tit,
, PAMONSEMCH.
dlhv'll'u"k-AVA
bt,
An-
� �10
-4,j

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
Telephone:
TABLE I - Field Specifications t
County:
Date: ve 2 4'1
Field
Number2
Approximate
Maximum
Useable size
or Fleld3
(acres)
Soil Type
slope
(X}
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate +
(Inlhr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle4
(inches)
Comments
17
•.
r v q Re
35
O
Z
!7
2•d
c
•35
Z-tpo
'Table to be completed in its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
ul
Irrigation Parameters
,October, 1995
page-1
USDA -MRCS
North Carolina

1
TABLE 2. - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
.goods ��
C I cared
Make, Mode! and Type of Equipmet:f:
Field Not
and
Hydrant Noe
Travel
Speed
(fUmin)
Application
Rate
(inlhr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (tt) Length (ft)
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle operating operating i KO
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(inches) Gun (psi) Reel (psi) Pattems
r/I
Comments/ ' -
c _
.3. 5 Y
3 I
:�73a
9?
OU
.92
T 9Fr
30 v
�.
( I
I
d G
0o
~ 2
fry
% 99
30®
41 ` 2;
t -
I (
'
D
�/0
CUD
%
O
S� I
��/
I --z
i
9/0
.2Z
is�j�
//o�
, 7
/9�y/�
y�Q7
C . / I
r i
J - at rr
I
I
I
i
I
'See attached map provided by the Field Q;fce for field location(s).
'Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in degrees.
'ion Parameters usDA-Nr
er 1995 p North C.
3 3::_

'ion Parameters
er 1995
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpni)
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
'
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
(�
I
Hose Length (feet)
�j s"
' XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
l
C'C/C4/
I XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
/ e
Pump Poorer Requirement (hp)
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications'
Designer may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. fa.)
90• Bend
3
Dead End
Tee
r'au c) c-I*,-
c, L
7
I See USDA -MRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Piactice Code 430-13D.
P+
USDA-Nr
North C.

Name:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinklers).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the
designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval
of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip 21 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DEHNR-DEM Code Section 15A NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.
Ion Parameters USDA-W
er 1996 P. North C.

REVEELE AGRI PRODUCTS, INC.
P.O. F30X 68
508 WEST BROAD STREET
MURFREF.SSORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27855
TELEPHONE [phone]
NARRATIVE OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM OPERATION
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a
similar sheet most convenient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization, and regular
maintenance of all equipment.
This irrigator is designed to apply ,M of water at specified ratings. Pump
should be primed and started and 103M traveling hose should be extended to
specific destinations in accordance with map. The reel should be started in
manner that is given in owner's manual that accompanies the machine. The
machine is equipped with shutoff system, so there is no harm done to the machine
itself. The irrigator should only be run in accordance with the waste management
plans and to the specifications of this design.
Winterization should be done when the machine will be shut down for more
than a month at a time, during the winter season. All water should be drained
and machine should be greased and oiled.
Regular checks should be made on the reel, hose, and all mechanical
equipment on the machine itself.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE ,4S AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: C. B. Bunting
1.3 Mailing address: Rt l Box 144-B
City, State: Pinetops NC I Zip: 27864
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-827-4342
1.4 County where facility is located: Edgecombe-
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Location: State Road 1204 north rigltt side road,
south of Tarboro on 258, Sugg Crossroads, take right till come to 1204 take rigt. �!
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/65
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2: OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 33 (county number); 4 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description. Swine operation
Farrow to Wean
It 34- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct?yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum mum er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean (# sow)
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Layer
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Non -Layer
Turkey
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Dairy
Beef
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 33 - 4

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): _ 34 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 19.4
2.4 Number o lagoon torage ponds (circle which is applicable): 5 __
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or Is (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
(& or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? of / ,p r
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal " --
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the -following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan'(WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28198 Page 2 of 4 33 - 4
f

• - Facility Number: 33 - 4
Facility Name: Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, 0— 2, &j-; Jt, VL (Land Ownees name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for 8 ax'LkC .sLLJ u_ Fj2,L.c.t Crv�au � FW of (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is acturate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete. / C�
Signature Date (per / j
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1. 1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate an complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-GE 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 33 - 4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1/98)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
CIay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasqubtank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt -
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115.
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Granville
Halifax
Johnston
Lee
Nash
Northampton
Orange
Person
Vance
Wake
Warren
Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington,.NC 28405-3945
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore .
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 7714600
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Sur y
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 4 of 4

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification RECEIVED
(Please type or print al1 information that does not require a signature) ftTER ()l1ALITYSECnON
General 113fori�atigp: NW
- Name of Farm: +-� CG2A r` 'n Facility No: ��
Owner(s) Name: C • P3. Phone No:
Mailing Address: sa,
Fann Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:_ D 3 o Zo 1 v 3 O t oo � ea
Latitude and Longitude: �R' '1" 1 �° -,-S' 5 i ] County:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): 112n,i�er N�i�rl t c� S l u,3 -T. C,
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
O Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean 1I 3L*
❑ Farrow to Feeder
O Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle
t7 Dairy
❑ Beef
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: '34 • o Required Acreage: 1.
Number o agoons / torage Ponds: iJ Total Capacity: 5? , 3`j a Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new gnimals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that runoff of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owngr•,: C -13 -j2'
Signature:
Date: 14 L - z f - f 7
Name of Manager(if differEnt from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24, 1996

Technical Specialist Certif - ition .'
A
I. As a technical sre-cialis. ,signated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission
pursuant to;1.5A► NCAC 6F -0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm
named "above iYa an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications
f the Drvzston of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the -
USDA-Naturah Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Cort'servatiori Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following ele,men,ts�are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical
specialist4�h'o,may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only
certify parts for which they are technically competent. .
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storag4. Treatment Systm
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume,B adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with
waste utilization requirements.
New, expanded or retrofitted f� (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems,
Iagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and
specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): . 3 . _�, �►� ITt.c-�-I .SZ !,
Affiliation: NtLcS
Address (Agency):-- ice. -C)36x- _lt7 i 1 �F 37 Phone No.: Rl�
Signature: G . �f 61 .�.+.�e� Date: 5/ 30/ 9 7
B) Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): A 3 , ua►-t n. TIT
Affiliation: n; PCS
Address(Agency):_ ? . 0 D TAE-"Zst� fjL a2f&v Phone No.: 1 {D`I 1- -7 I'j a Za
Signature:. Date: 52-1!ZY,7
--�—•-- • Tom--
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
15 Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
designed in accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): , A . -6:u
Affiliation: t
Address(Agency): --�>bk. j L� I A ej a- c+ Wu G, -Phone No.: `t -7 jf6r'�
Signature: �,. l.Z% ��� Date: 5%3D/y 7
AWC -- April 24, 1996 2

D) Application andHandling i nt
Check the appropriate box
M Existing facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to -apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;' -required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
❑ New or expanded facilit • or existing-facilityexisting-facility without existing waste application equipment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has.been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan). ,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: iy iZCS
a^ 6 Phone No.:
Address(Agency):_ -�. :i4�c 1� �:-1c�i , Nam.
Signature: r! fi C. L '` .y� c� Date:
"a e- .Z.'rt- y.Gti /�.1i�7'�-cz..G•' Cr fG .Z,(.�-wc.� �2�7-Li, (.Lis-l.� T /L?•t1• . �f�.1.�
�'R�tt.-T•.r-i. /Z..�t-4W �'/..;, .���L.i1L sC..I. :G•,L. ,.L4�:. 1., •C t -.fi.
III. Certification of Installation ..�,� y1'� �e.``ti
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not. limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC - April 24, 1996

B) Land Application Syite (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
9
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the
cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the
owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by
(month/day/year), the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the waste
utilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared
land within 30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim
crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_-F, - tnL-�i' TLC
Affiliation: 1N ZCS
Address (Agency):_?, o . - -cam 1 — Q4 LPhone No.: (GI_I5) i `T
Signature: 0_ _6 w � Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste
utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to
DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date
specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a
violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of po lu t fr lounging and heavy use areas have been
installed as specified in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature Date: "
AWC -- April 24, 1996 4

D) Annlication and Handling Eguigment Installation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
0 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has n6t been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approvalAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _ U-��4 L 7-tf--
Affiliation:— -
Address(Agency):��X t o � � iZ t3. ,�s> �Z�- ��E✓ � G=Phone No.: �`r' � �~ ` t � - 1 ��
Signature: f,c . TJ. L� / .
N'����t
The following signature
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment.as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a.violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the, complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- April-24, 1996

TECHNICAL SPECIALIST FOR ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
ti°
DESIGNATION CATEGORY
CODE
AREA OF AUTHORITY
- lagoons, storage ponds, dry stacks, storage structures,
Collection, Storage,
SD (design)
and/or Treatment
SI (installation)
composters, pushoff ramps, curbing and other similar
structures
waste Utilization Plan
WUP
- design and installation (development and
implementation) of land application plans
including crop and acreages available to meet nutrient
budget, hydraulic and nutrient loading rates, placement
of application site buffers
- measurement of existing storage volume
- confirmation of existence and compatibility of .land
application equipment with waste utilization plan
- cartification of cropping systems
- confirmation of absence of exterior lots
_
- confirmation of sludge and effluent removal and
application at agronomic rates for lagoon closure
Runoff Controls
RC
- design and installation of filter strips, grass
channels, and related bmps used to reduce runoff from
exterior lots (primarily dairy operations)
Irrigation Equipment
I
- design and installation of irrigation systems to
include pipe size, pump horsepower, nozzle size, system
layout, thrust blocks, etc. and operation plan to meet
criteria of Waste Utilization Plan (hours per set, etc.)
Technical Specialists are designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 5F.0005.
Technical Specialists should only certify parts of a plan for which they are technically competent.

s a� �"' 0 W •! P q;� u „ , `� ',1 , did l
4 45 oil
971 = 4 I \ " St Luke Ch
a
II 30
30
28.5
- 36.0Jo
A.
it
l N. y
964 _-
I 1 Z02
50'
~. do i
968 Cem : of
310
5:3 \
i
avisto
I .I do '••C';
30
low
1200 C. ggs Cr ssroads
/.
96711
Gracs Chapel
'•i /� �0 4: /tea ' . �603
2�
3
0
I '\_}� ��}.� •^'a nary^ •1
24.7
10
7-040
•S-y lz I � '`

�,
w
UNITED STATES Natural County Agriculture Building
DEPARTMENT OF Resources 403 Government'Circle, Suite 4
AGRICULTURE Conservation Greenville, NC 27834
Service Phone: [phone]
SUBJECT: 0200 Lagoon Date: Septemi1tLrCV VLtE)96
Bunting Farms (Grant) WATER OUALITY SECTION
1134 Farrow To Weanling
JUL 2 81998
To: Archie B. Whitley, III F,9fttUrV
District Conservationist
USDA- NRCS
Tarboro, NC 27886-0010
I have done a detailed evaluation of Bunting Farms swine
operation lagoon for 1134 Sows Farrow To Weanling. This
operation is not a true 1134 Sows Farrow to Weanling, the
following is a break down of animals on farm. 1139 Sows @ 400
pounds, 61 Boars @ 450 pounds, 1363 Pigs @ 6 pounds. This total
will equal 1134 Sows Farrow To Weanling. The existing lagoons
exceed the requirements for capacity and only needs some
maintenance improvements. The following is a list of work that
needs to be completed in order for a Technical Specialist to do a
Technical Certification on this operation which is required by
law to be done prior to December 31, 1997.
ITEMS OF WORK
1: Maintain the existing dikes around lagoons 1, 2 and 3, to a
top elevation of 49.5 feet or higher. The top width should be
maintained to a 10-12 foot top. The outside side slopes should
be maintained with a 3.0:1 side slope.
2: Maintain the existing dikes around lagoon 4 and 5 to a top
elevation of 45.0 feet or higher. The top width should be
maintained to a 10-12 foot top. The outside slopes should be
maintained with a 3.0:1 side slope.
3: Install a minimum diameter 10 inch PVC pipe at or below
elevation 46.3 feet to transfer waste between lagoons 1, 2 and 3.
See site map for locations.
4: Install a minimum diameter 10 inch PVC pipe at elevation 42.1
feet to transfer waste from lagoon 5 to lagoon 4. See site map..
for location.

: Construct waterways and diversions as shown on site map to
smove surface water away from lagoons and off site.
Inspect buildings, flush tanks, pipes, etc. to make sure
here are no leaks and repair according.
7: Remove solids from lagoons 1 and 2 to restore the needed
depth. See site map for elevations.
8: Replace outlet pipe from swine house B to lagoon 1, use PVC
schedule 40 with 6 inch minimum diameter.
9: There are several items that need to be corrected on or
around swine house A. Install roof gutters to remove roof water
away from lagoons. Maintain the concrete flush trough by
cleaning out, raise the outside block walls of trough to
elevation 49.5 feet or higher. Replace all outlet pipes to
lagoon. Remove the concrete that is on the ground between the
house and lagoon. Maintain the dikes to planned elevation. See
plan maps for details.
10: All cattle will need to be removed from site or fenced off
lagoons and vegetated areas to protect grass. It may be
necessary to fence a walk way for the cattle to move through the
area without causing damage to the vegetation.
11: Vegetate all disturbed areas according to NRCS
specifications.
12: There is a earth island in lagoon 3 that needs to be
removed. See plan map for location.
13: All collection boxes at end of swine houses will need to be
at or above the top elevation of the dike.
14: Develop Emergency Action Plan for this operation. A sample
copy of a EAP is enclosed, if you choose to use this one the
phone numbers and etc. will need to be filled in.
15: Develop a Waste Utilization Plan to proper apply the waste
at agronomic rates to a crop or pasture. This plan will be based
on a 90 day pumping cycle. Be sure to use the areas Capability.
and Realistic Yields chart in developing this plan. See the
typical section on the drawing sheet for management elevations of
the lagoon. At some point it will become necessary to remove
some solids (sludge) from the lagoon. The sludge should be

`._ agitated and applied at agronomic rates. This will require
"t additional land that is not set aside for waste application.
The above items are minimum work to be done in order for a
Technical Specialist to do a Technical Certification on this
operation which is required by law to be done prior to December
31, 1997.
This evaluation is based on steady state live weight of 489,290
pounds.
-
If you have questions or I can be of assistance in any way please
let me know. If necessary I will schedule time to review this
plan with you and your staff along with the owner prior to
starting any construction.
aaaz ///. 4
Claude M. Long
Civil Engineering Technician

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMWs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
rarms�eaa • awuie pronuction 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers;
J� Recommended best management practices;
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body. surfaces • Dirty manure -covered animals -0 Dry floors '
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors <6 Slotted floors;
❑/ Waterers located over slotted floors;
O Feeders at high end of solid floors;
0 Scrape manure buildup from floors;
0 Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; Cy Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition / or scrape;
0 Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; 7 Fan maintenance;
Dust 0 Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
• Dust
f f
Wasltdown between groups of animals;
❑
Feed additives;
Cl
Feeder covers;
❑
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
Cl
Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
Cl
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
• Agitation during wastewater
Cl
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
Cl
Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
0
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC -November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source Cause BUN to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures; '
• Agitation 116 Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when.pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
1( Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; /❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; .
nozzles r Wind drift A /Minimum recommended operating pressure;
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin + Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
• Mixing while filling; level; .
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Remove settled solids regularly f
Manure, slurry or sludge . Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets . Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slung or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 4813rs.; ;
surfaces
❑
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
• Carcass decomposition
Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal
• Carcass decomposition
❑
Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pus
❑
Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators
• Incomplete combustion
❑
Secundary stack burners
. AP"Y November 11, 1996, Page 4

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto a Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional information : Available From
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88 NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88 NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program; NPPC Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5 j

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause
RUPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters
+ Accumulation of solids
O Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
Cl Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids
Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids .,to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more iltan 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative
• Decaying vegetation
Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along watees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed Spillage 4t3 Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
IClean-up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
I
Feed Storage + Accumulations of feed residues ❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
0 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
-ivember 11, 1996, Page
1 l

Source Cause
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes Q
and feed wastage
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes 13
Systems
O
0
BMPs to Control Insects. Site Specific Practices
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize k
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and -
manure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
M
AM IC ,November 11. 1996, Page 2

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM _
SWCD
MRCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. - Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a.. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the.reasori(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate.the application rates for the•fields:where runoff occurred.
- ----- - - C: -Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop tecycle pump:
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
1 December 18, 1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
- a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone' - - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of.the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department. '
d. Contact'CES, phone nnmbcr- ! , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for adviceltechnical assistance phone nuinber- - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
1 T7aram},ar 12 1 004

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
3 - December 18, 1996

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
G Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
G Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
G Complete incineration
:1 1n the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 13, 1996

• C�� rs F� A? rr-
N {ZCS COP-/
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571 - 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-641 7843
SWCD 919-641-7900
NRCS 919--641-7900
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow --possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all additional flow to the lagoon.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field- actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.

E:
this is
Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
•c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-511 -'4-7oo. After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-64J.—764-5.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-(oy1 --79t5 , local SWCD
office phone number 919-6�11 - 1goo, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-so-ll - 1%;0 .
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that
person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: s v-.S Cif
b. Contractors Adress: o K 3 t 0 �k bay o�"yt -c . L7 6:-
c . Contractors Phone: g2_

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:,g_
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.

:CEIVED.
YULf1YSEGT' N
PRODUCER: BUNTING FARMS GRANT OPERATION
on-p*'h8190 Fbmmitgi g
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine waste
management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: FESCUE is being established on these areas. Beginning
in 1996 and each year thereafter, the embankment should be
fertilized with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a
vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made at least
annually. Items to be checked should include, as a minimum, the
following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes
a. separation of joints
b. cracks or breaks
C. accumulation of salts or minerals
d. overall condition of pipes
2. Lagoon surface
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. wet or damp areas on the back slope
d. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave
action
e. rodent damage
1

i Ft

Y L
B.
OPERATION AM MAINTENANCE
4. Transfer Pump - recycling and irrigation pumps
a. overall pump operation
b. leaks
C. loose fittings
5. Surface water diversion
a. adequate vegetation
b. diversion capacity
C. ridge berm height
Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total steady
live weight of 489,290 pounds. The lagoon contains both permanent
and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be pumped in
order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The design
includes permanent storage of 0.67 cubic foot per pound of steady
state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste produced over 90 days, the amount of rainfall in a 25
year 24 hour storm event plus and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for 90 days of temporary storage;
therefore, it will need to be pumped every three months. Begin pump -
out of the lagoons 1,2,3 when fluid level reaches elevation 47.9 feet
as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level
reaches elevation 46.3 feet. Begin pump out of lagoons 4,5 when
fluid level reaches elevation 43.2 feet as marked by permanent
markers. Stop pump -out when fluid level reaches elevation 42.1 feet.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such
as weather runoff or leaching. See detail drawing for a better
understanding of managing the pumping range.
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to .insure the waste
is applied as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
Waste treatment lagoons must be precharged with a
equal to one-half of the treatment volume before
introduced. Precharing reduces the concentration
volume of water
wastes are
of the initial
0

waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush water and
irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below the surface and as
far from the inlet pipes as possible in order to provide a cleaner
effluent for flushing and to reduce odors when irrigating on land.
When these pipes are placed through the embankment, they should be
compacted with clay material.
After five.years the waste treatment lagoon must be checked for
sludge accumulation annually. If sludge had encroached into the
treatment volume, the sludge must be removed and applied at agronomic
rates based on analysis of the sludge. Treatment volume must have a
minimum of 4 feet of depth free of sludge at all times.,
In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) in
North Carolina revised water quality regulations that address animal
operations. These rules became effective on February 1, 1993 (15A
.operations.
2H .0200). ' This animal operation shall be operated within the
requirements of these rules and regulations.
3

�:.
.� +'r:

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE SWINE LAGOON
CLIENTS
COUNTY
TODAYS
SITING
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NUMBER
NAME
DATE
LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) =>
OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH =--====>
OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
OF DEVELOPING GILTS
OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS >
OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
(5 year minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION ======--==>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 6.0
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth of sludge = 2 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 341896.8
Permanent Volume Provided 419688.0
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED)
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON-VEGET.)
(i.e. feedlot & non -diverted area)
ADDITIONAL D. A. WITH EVAPORATION =====>
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O)
FREEBOARD
Bunting (Grant) Lagoon
Edgecombe County
September 29,1996
Yes
0
0
940
0
0
0
0
5
750.0
FEET
100.0
FEET
46.3
FEET
46.3
FEET
40.3
FEET
feet
1.0:1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
90 DAYS
10.2 INCHES
30 PERCENT
65 PERCENT
4.9 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
- 0 (NUMBER ONLY)
1.0 FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION ========> 49.5 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 161578.8 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 169128.2 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 49.5 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 756.4 feet Width = 106.4 feet
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP = 1.6 FEET
Volume To Be Pumped = 116644 cubic feet
Volume for Estimated Depth = 122181 cubic feet
Begin Pumping Elevation = 47.9 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 46.3 feet
1,2,3

DY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
`"ter 0
head
weanling to feeder
x 30 lbs. =
0
lbs
k; 0
head
feeder to finishing
x 135 lbs. =
0
lbs
940
sows
farrow to weanling
x 433 lbs. =
407020
lbs
0
sows
farrow to feeder x
522 lbs. =
0
lbs
• 0
sows
farrow to finish x
1417 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
developing gilts x 150 lbs.
=
0
lbs
0
stud
boars or gestating
sows =
0
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 407020 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge
accumulates at varying rates.
0
pounds
weanling to feeder x 0.25 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
feeder to finishing x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
407020
pounds
farrow to weanling x 0.17 --
69193.4
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to feeder x 0.17 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to finish x 0.25 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
of developing gilts x 0.25 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of
boar studs or gest. sows * 0.125=
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL SLUDGE ACCUMULATION 69193 cu. ft.
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design
Treatment Volume varies by animal type.
0
pounds
weanling to feeder x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
feeder to finishing x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
407020
pounds
farrow to weanling x 0.67 =
272703.4
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to feeder x 0.67
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to finish x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
of developing gilts x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of
boar studs or gest. sows * 1 =
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME REQUIRED FOR LAGOON - 272703 cu. ft.
TOTAL VOLUME FOR TREATMENT AND SLUDGE = 341896.8 cu. ft.
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 46.3 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 40.3 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH =
750.0 100.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
738.0 88.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) -
744.0 94.0
75000.0 (AREA OF TOP)
64944.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
69936.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)

'LWZCU. YD. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
75000.0 279744.0 64944.0 1:000
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL=19688.0 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 341896.8 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 750.0 FEET LONG BY 100.0 FEET WIDE
5. DAM
Place spoil as a continuous dam to elevation 49.5 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dam)
Length * Width =
756.4 106.4 80481 square feet
Additional Drainage Area Without Evaporation
Vegetated 0 square feet
Non -Vegetated 0 square feet
Additional Drainage Area With Evaporation
0 square feet
TOTAL• ❑A 80481 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 90 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
0
head
weanling
to feeder x 0.5 gals/day -
0
gals/day
0
head
feeder to
finishing x 2.3 gals/day =
0
gals/day
940
sows
farrow to
weanling x 7.2 gals/day -
6768
gals/day
0
sows
farrow to
feeder x 8.0 gals/day -
0
gals/day
0
sows
farrow to
finish x 23.0 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
developing gilts
x 2.5 gals/day =
0
gals/day
0
stud
boars or
gest. sows x 6.7 gals/day =
0
gals/day
TOTAL
VOLUME OF
WASTE =
6768
gals/day
Volume =
6768 gals/day * 90 days in
the
pumping
cycle
divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 81433.2 cubic feet
6B. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) = 5.2 inches
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 35210.4 cubic feet

+ Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 44935.2 cubic feet
6D. Volume of "Heavy Rain"
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 81433.2 cubic feet
6B. 35210.4 cubic feet
6C. 44935.2 cubic feet
6D. 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 161578.8 cubic feet
7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
VOLUME OF TEMPORARY STORAGE WHEN TOP OF DAM IS 49.5 FEET ELEV.
AREA OF BOTTOM = 75000.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 78759.4 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 76874.8 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 169128.2 cubic feet
THE DIMENSIONS•OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 49.5 FT.
ARE 756.4 FEET BY 106.4 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 81433.2 cubic feet
6B. 35210.4 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 116643.6 cubic feet
VOLUME AT ESTIMATED PUMPING DEPTH
AREA OF BOTTOM = 75000.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 77730.2 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 76362.6 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 122181.5 cubic feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE SWINE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME -------------------------->
COUNTY
TODAYS DATE
SITING LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) =>
NUMBER OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH =======>
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
NUMBER OF DEVELOPING GILTS
NUMBER OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS >
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
(5 year minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION ===--- ===>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =_->
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 6.0
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth of sludge = 2 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume'Required 69106.8
Permanent Volume Provided 164664.0
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED)
ADDITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON--VEGET.)
(i.e. feedlot & non -,diverted area)
ADDITIONAL D. A. WITH EVAPORATION
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE =>
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =------------>
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O)
FREEBOARD
Bunting (Grant) Lagoon 4,5
Edgecombe County
September 29,1996
Yes
0
0
190
0
0
0
0
5
514.0
FEET
60.0
FEET
42.1
FEET
42.1
FEET
36.1
FEET
f eet
1.0.1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
90 DAYS
10.2 INCHES
30 PERCENT
65 PERCENT
4.9 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0 (NUMBER ONLY)
1.0 FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION =--_====> 45.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 50520.2 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 60677.3 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation =
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of
Length = 519.8 feet Width
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP =
Volume To Be Pumped
Volume for Estimated Depth =
Begin Pumping Elevation =
Stop Pumping Elevation =
45.0 feet
Dam
65.8 feet
1.1 FEET
31424 cubic feet
34620 cubic feet
43.2 feet
42.1 feet

1F;
rx
STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
head weanling to feeder
x 30 lbs. -
0
lbs
0
head feeder to finishing
x 135 lbs. -
0
lbs
190
sows farrow to weanling
x 433 lbs. =
82270
lbs
0
sows farrow to feeder x
522 lbs. =
0
lbs
0
sows farrow to finish x
1417 lbs. -
0
lbs
0
developing gilts x 150
lbs. -
0
lbs
0
stud boars or gestating
sows =
0
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE
WEIGHT (SSLW) -
82270
lbs
2.
SLUDGE
ACCUMULATION
Sludge
accumulates at varying rates.
0
pounds
weanling to feeder x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
feeder to finishing x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
82270
pounds
farrow to weanling x 0.17 =
13985.9
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to feeder x 0.17 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
farrow to finish x 0.25 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds
of developing gilts x 0.25 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of
boar studs or gest. sows * 0.125=
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL SLUDGE ACCUMULATION - 13986 cu. ft.
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design Treatment Volume varies by animal type.
0
pounds weanling to feeder x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds feeder to finishing x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
82270
pounds farrow to weanling x 0.67 -
55120.9
cu.
ft.
0
pounds farrow to feeder x 0.67 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds farrow to finish x 1.0 -
0
cu.
ft.
0
pounds of developing gilts x 1.0 =
0
cu.
ft.
0
lbs. of boar studs or Best. sows * 1 =
0
cu.
ft.
TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME REQUIRED FOR LAGOON =
55121
cu.
ft.
TOTAL VOLUME FOR TREATMENT AND SLUDGE -
69106.8
cu.
ft.
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 42.1 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 36.1 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2
1.0 1.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH *WIDTH
514-.0 60.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb -
502.0 48.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) -
508.0 54.0
SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
1.0 1.0 6.0
30840.0 (AREA OF TOP)
24096.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
27432.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)

5. DAM
YD. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
30840.0 109728.0 24096.0 1.000
LUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL=64664.0 CU. FT.
LUME NEEDED = 69106.8 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 514.0 FEET LONG BY 60.0 FEET WIDE
Place spoil as a continuous dam to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dam)
Length * Width -
519.8 65.8 34203 square feet
Additional Drainage Area Without Evaporation
Vegetated 0 square feet
Non -Vegetated 0 square feet
Additional Drainage Area With Evaporation
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 34203 square feet
Pumping cycle 'to be 90 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
0 head weanling to feeder x 0.5 gals/day =
0 head feeder to finishing x 2.3 gals/day =
190 sows farrow to weanling x 7.2 gals/day -
0 sows farrow to feeder x 8.0 gals/day -
0 sows farrow to finish x 23.0 gals/day =
0 developing gilts x 2.5 gals/day -
0 stud boars or gest. sows x 6.7 gals/day =
45.0 feet.
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
1368 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
0 gals/day
TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE - 1368 gals/day
Volume = 1368 gals/day * 90 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 16459.9 cubic feet
6B. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) =
5.2 inches
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 14963.7 cubic feet

�C. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 19096.6 cubic feet
6D. Volume of "Heavy Rain"
Volume = Volume from lagoon + volume from feedlots, etc + volume from
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 16459.9 cubic feet
6B. 14963.7 cubic feet
6C. 19096.6 cubic feet
6D. 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 50520.2 cubic feet
7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
VOLUME OF TEMPORARY STORAGE WHEN TOP OF DAM IS 45.0 FEET ELEV.
AREA OF BOTTOM = 30840.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 33035.6 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 31934.2 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 60677.3 cubic feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 45.0 FT.
ARE 519.8 FEET BY 65.8 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 16459.9 cubic feet
6B. 14963.7 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 31423.6 cubic feet
VOLUME AT ESTIMATED PUMPING DEPTH
AREA OF BOTTOM = 30840.0 sq. ft.
AREA OF TOP = 32107.6 sq. ft.
AREA OF MID -SECTION = 31472.6 sq. ft.
VOLUME PROVIDED = 34620.3 cubic feet
DESIGNED BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:

REC - 66J1Z s c��y
VItAiCr? QV,LliySEC7'i0N
rJUN 1 01998
E M E R G E N C Y A C T 10 N ,PLchif'�1N,j tong
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571 - 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919--641 7843
SWCD 919-641-7900
NRCS 919-641-7900
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a.
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate.
C.
Stop
all additional flow to
the lagoon.
d.
Call
a pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water
is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field- actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.

E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-571 - 4-7ua. After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-Oql - 7643.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-(o4i -'79tS , local SWCD
office phone number 919-6,ll - -igoo , and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-ko-{+ - -Iiuo .
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that
person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: S-vL-S Cif /
b. Contractors Adress : S p K 3t 0 4 w �0,- 0 .?7 -C
C. Contractors Phone:

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: -- �,t3_ �il�t rC�y -�- rveCS
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Q
w ,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department `of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
FILE -ACCESS RECORD
SECTION ��_ DATE/TIME
NAME REPRESENTING�n
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the _Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day -today program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.M.., and 3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 4.45
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number} as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited t2 -five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is 2.5 cents for ALL copies if making more than 25 copies - there is no chase if
less than 25 copies are made. Paymgnt is to be made by check, money order, or cash in the
administrative offices.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. No briefcases lame -totes. etc. are permitted in the file review area. To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME
2.
3.
4.
5.
,,& �, �o f 1 ��
Sign ture and Name of l'ii B siness a
Please attach a business card to this form H available
COUNTY
ID . oo i=
Time In Time Out

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
5�1s^
S�JAM ES H. HUNTJR.,
tiv" 'GOVERMOR
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
April 12, 1999
Mr. C.B. Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm
Route 1, Box 144-B
Pinetops, North Carolina 27864
Subject: Notice of Violation.__ ___
(Bunting-Swine-Farm\Main-Farm )
Permit No. AWS3330004-
(Edgecombe-County-�
— �—�_.
Dear Mr. Bunting:
On April 7, 1999, Mr. Buster Towel] of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection at the subject facility. The inspection revealed the following
violations of the General Permit.
Your General Permit requires that the Operator In Charge (OIC) record the
available freeboard from your waste lagoons on a weekly basis. The Inspection
revealed that such records had not been kept.
Your lagoon marker should be set so that the top of the stake corresponds to the
lowest point on the dike wall. You should make the necessary corrections to your
current marker so that it reflects the actual freeboard in the lagoon. By doing this, it
will be easier for the OIC to accurately record the required weekly freeboard levels.
The land application records indicate that there have been overapplications of
animal waste on several fields at this facility. Mr. Towell discovered the reason for
the overapplication was due to an error in recording the target Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) on the IRR-2 Nutrient Balance Work Sheet.
The target PAN that was being used at your facility was based on both crops for the
fields utilizing a coastal bermuda/small grain overseed and for all three crops in
fields that were to be planted in a corn, wheat, soybean rotation. The records also
did not take into account the prescribed application windows for maximum
utilization of nitrogen for each crop.
3800 SARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHoNE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

F
Mr. C.B. Bunting
Page 2
i
Please note that the above violations are violations of your General Permit and are subject to
civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation. Please respond to this Notice within
fourteen days. Your response should be in writing, and should include copies of your land
application records on the IRR-2 forms for all land application events for 1998 and 1999.
Please indicate what crop was planted in each of your fields and the applicable months that each
crop type was applied on.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this Notice, please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jim Baluss, Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance Group
RRO Files
3304nov

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
C. B. Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Rt I Box 144-B
Pinetops NC 27854
Dear C. B. Bunting:
ITLT?WAA
0
A&4 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES.
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 3.3=4�6.
Edgecombe. County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludgestresiduals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity'Aftirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
-and Natural Resources -
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
C.B. Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Rt 1 Box 144-B
Pinetops NC 27864
Dear C.B. Bunting:
A FT;W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES'
September 25, 1998
SAP 3 O lg��
1i155'
1
�.l r
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330004
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
In accordance with your application received on June 10, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to C. B. Bunting, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm, located in Edgecombe
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 1134 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS330004
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall'be final and
- binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water' Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
JLA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
919/571-4700
Fife Access Record
SECTION
TIME/DATE
NAME
REPRESENTING:
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the°:Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read carefully the following
Guidelines before sionina the farm
We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision is available,
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM, Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SignaTuo and Name
Pleme a badness card
FACILITY NAME
Firm/Business
I r«m
Date
COUNTY
[:b-))
Time In Time Out

- - - - - - - - - -
LAGOON ERMOARD'
Qmit number—name:ak 4
Owner: 1) e) ur Lo 5 V- CIS R yA71-,r'jq c,, Number of lagoons at facility:
U
Operator in Responsible Charge: 0 o u Certificate Number,
V /identified19 6
If more than one lagoon at this facilty, please describe in words or -by drawing, which lagoon is as
lagoon number 1, lagoons number 2, etc, and note (asterik *) which lagoons, if any, have dssi ed s illways.
I
11. k
X.;(
&.1
P41AA d'-1
Record freeboard
plus ava
lable stoora
D"'
e capacity
ca '
n feet
Date
Lagoon #2-
Lagoon #_
Lagoon
Lagoon
Nagoon #
Lagoon #
L oan
ag
Initials
;�40W
M ­f77!�'
V_lLagwn#_
M
W
-OW
�,;t..77
7
Mgt*
-1z
ir
4�02 �";�-�R
�A
qrX
1. Freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon
0
embankment and the level of liquid.
I
For lagoons with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should
be recorded.
2. Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly.
lz� 3/20197

�;�'
q
� �' �
'
•��r��}rim � �i f� '
'�x
r r
ktnumber:--33-4 name: P1, A NTT—
Owner: 120v4SC/311'A( Number of lagoons at facility: 3
Operator in Responsible Charge: DQ v Certificate Number:
/ 7 �/d3
If more than one lagoon at this facilty, please describe in words or'by drawing, which lagoon is i entified as
lagoon number 1, lagoons number 2, etc, and note (asterik *) which lagoons, if any, have designed spillways.
W M Dr ►^
a
Record freeboard plus available storage capacity in feet.
ev " f
Date
Lagoon #-3
Lagoon #
Lagoon #
L oon #
La oon #_
oan #
Lagoon #
Lnoon #
Initials
kc ''
'^.cRlti�`3+S
mraNY'Y'.Keb#x� �5.
�^+�1¢�Tb'Yi4`.v �'>"i-<
>i ">e-nc
r+�4+.N4�4' � au
'�-3ir'�'¢y' 1W
rv..< r^n^..;e+V
' > �� ..,.0
r..t_�,fifi:Y �>iA
¢ yrr"J z
k. �J �w�° .`."Gsi
,u�k `�
- �µ M _
.:J �iF�.�+3LSk9.F:�.
d.! gf, i,
:. �^,o-."���k".^..�s��
mow, §..
V"�� :`.°-^:x
�v'w.a�>a> �'n.,'�`i
.�°fi>r.':` 3 Nr!'-;
�3Ps¢�+°° t
.s - `4+. "x�
'�d:✓`��ftw
q '� ya:r'�`i.,�z�
:��'�.
,.,sA•-. J
n.. �'%6k y.{0.!'y�,.
x. 4Yf L.. k¢Tx .:
...•-�' ..� �
^iY��T:�
�. >Kr++..: Ki
��: ��'�:
.'� Yr,.ia •�'�
.. q. �!�}
6 w ..
'•,,nz'� �
�;� �i:
w x�
'.�, ws<
`.s x"!'l;§'i.."
•r„
3.c,w. tm
,.�� ,`xf, G:
>.�e�i*
:"'
.im r bxa'S>:
.n
--.•:5..� 7{ N :
$ yi=�T.2�'
.f,`ety +.,3.c
;,•.'�+, .. n_iFa .3
'i�',0 $,l,g �'.�,c,< -
ab -.; f"3"�'#f. �;r!?.,.
i S e t 3.* i:i
•.ia'.9&t ��.T^ °?��':
x } "I•;,yag xxrg'�e�"
""Wfa'"�ri� °x n,.xk
z9-� *M
:w.""p�".
., ea<
9 E ✓ 'Y.c
..;i:. OwnS ¢ �
A.e=r F ._ Aa4i
.. M Yrv• r..,0
44
i.�2v' 1 s ^. ;
.„ rfa tit,
d'^.rr r+q,.
7'YG1� P�kR�nii
.;.�k;ha. �.
a'ry:ry'.t• a:7:�
.q.w^ r.:+',.
.�,x a�F:'�
�i..s �
�..,ty
�t�:,.�f:_
!�Y' � p'��?`.
,��^.'�§,. `ew`�
.*�%�i
1. Freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon
embankment and the level of liquid.
JFor lagoons with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should
be recorded.
2. Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly.
3/24/97

Fonts IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
r 3
y Owner's Phone #
EXHIBIT B - GRANT FARM
-K
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
o �3 Field #
r � J
C.B.BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
RT 1 BOX 144B
PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
252 827 4342
u i i
i APR 2 0 199
E .
DENIYR RALEIGH REGIBIAL OFF iCc'
tr .
Facility Number 3 3- -
Irrigation Operator C . B . BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
Irrigation Operator's RT 1 BOX 144B
Address PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
Operator's Phone # [phone]
EDGECOt1BE
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading r
RMt1D & RYE (Wacro) , (e) J 0
oil fit r'll M fr% frn rT rat ref nn. ,...
Date
mmlddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysts PAN'
pbll000 gad
PAN Applied
pb/acre)
�8) x (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
phlacre)
(a) - 00)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
M of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gav"n)
total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Aae
(gaUaae)
_(7t_
A
-3-
cn
3�7
J.o
3.'7
r0,x
,P - 5 4
c u
7 2 S`
Y. 7
7
,Z.
10 U o
1 --°
s— a
7 7P
- -
0o
Oo
mac*
�(�
S G
'%'J
r 33
-I/-
/moo
,A co
C
65'
e7�'
7�S
i
3.
00
�a
1
-
f vG
—
I
1
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
t NCCA Waste Anaylysls or Equivalent or NFICS Estimate. Technical Guide Sectiori 633.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.
;'. 7 '. 1 i

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Redord
. _ _ - ' One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
' 1 P Field Size (acres) - (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
5'
Owner's Phone #
(,,. 1 - Facility Number 3 -
Irrigation operator r ow
Irrigation Operator's g f I da x 01q 11-e
. Address ,' ��� -c N,r • .277E y
Operator's Phone 9- y 3 v.,%.:—
I
. : ProM Waste Utilizatlon Plan
Crop Type rteoorrnTrerrded PAN Loading ) C� q
S f r 1 (Vane) s (131 I I 0 , 1
r1, 191 fit (41 151 _ (8) r7) let 191 r1n1 r1n
3 -Field
�i 3
f Cu v y I-
/('t
z- x - Y, n 43L,
S
pale
rnfWddlyr
Irrigation • .
Waste Analysis PAN'
JR),1000 gag
PAN Applied
(Wacre)
-i s) • (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance i
(Wacre)
(B) • 00)
9
Start Time
tend Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - Ix)
R of sprinklers "
Operating
Flow llbtd
(gaVmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) ■ (5) r (4)
vd mle
per Acre
(gavacre)
71
lAl
-a&•
eo
d-co
c
ES`
f a
Z
1+
3+ Y
-
b 3
// 3 0
0
-
IC'o
1
1.
3• o
3-
3�G-4,
49I-
Af 8
3,
2
3�
Q4S 16
2C
' ds
.220.
a .f?
3-� -
eov
oo
40
(/
D
712
J,
3.s
.3
Al- 3o-F
'goo
700
6e .
1
�r
?
2,.
Flo
710
90
/� 11
oLio
?2.i
70
S�
_ 7 f-o
.121
3 ,7S—
/ 6 , o -
W-/3
/DDo
/ �-o
o
s-
1+
6-3
-
b'Oo
as
/L_c
ru
+3
Crop Cycle Totals
OWner'a Signature Operators Signature
Certirled Operator (Print) - Operators Certification No.
. r l'',)ltltt�i�i�ctz�•ii�r�!';r;� ..il.) )ii' .t�;-it! i .•+r•:
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivnl i-slimsltr}, t6chttl0n, tltiid 9e�+ +I• :i+ rt't . '
' Enter the value roccived by suht. 10) frdm (11). Continuo sul irrnn (10) from column (11) follov.
igation event.

_Y
r
re-
FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) a (A)
Farm Owner
/ v Owner's Address
owner's Phone #
44
Lagoon! Irrigations Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number 3 3 ;
Irrlgatlon Operator c -
Irrigation Operatot's R f/ /30 > v v T
Address ,
Operator's Phone N
• r _
• Proth Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type d Recommended PAN Loading
C .f IU r (rofecre) - (b)
.rr rat rtr ref f51 re! (7) {Bt r91 1101 tier
p
Meld #
.1.,
3
� � cu, �'r✓ 1.
Rif 1 6" X
:3 e c
.ZS • 8 X 7 - y 3 gL'
F
bare
mrNddlyr
Wastlon • • .
-R
Waste Analysis PAN'
ta>lt000 gall
PAN Appried
(Nacre)
(e) " (9)
1000
Nr"en Balance
(
(B) • 00)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3)-(2)
of pe
Operating
flow niold
(9avmM)
I
Tolel Voluins
(gallons)
(a) ■ (s) w (4)
-
Votrmis
per Acre
(gaVaae)
-aL
A
1'c-o
era
20
6
1 �0.6
37
3
• l� L
1 -8S-
2
e o
COc
3
e`0
3
N I r41 L
co
? z
,
b
1p �$ •'6
- --9
q.sae.
1•3.
00
d
3
,,3
, 3
5x/,
_/O�-1 -f9
o-
•o
eo
/t-.o
evo
3
3-
i
1
!
00
O
37?5
3'7
, 2-
rn,r,F3
�G�
7'
en
Doa
700.
37P,r
,3
v
$ py•1/
1'31.
oa
`J/a
G�
(car
1.3
11702
DU
000
20
-...3
9
90
rot
�I
-
.�v
4oZ
4,yL
}
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) .
Crop Cycle Toale 1 1
Operator's Signature
• Operator's Certificatlon No.
,I`�Lllfli-�frl7kly!:;1::+ r.!!.�?rS' •11:'!It f .•t:
r NCUA Waste Ansylysis or Equival 17--stImA1A, tathttlorll dulde
' Enter the value received by suhl. 10) fresrrr (13). Continua 8111 rinrn (10) from column (11) follov.
2 t(. 2 &
01C
igation event.

K
FORM IRR-2
Tract N
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
�i
rn
Owner's Phone N
Lagoon -Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field N iS
r S�
C.B.BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
RT I BOX 144B
PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
252 827 4342
Facility Number 1 3&=4 3 3 - - I EDGECOMBE
Irrigation Operator C . B. BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
Irrigation Operator's RT I BOX 144B
Address PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
Operator's Phone N 252 827 4342
From Waste Utllizatlon Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading /
COASTAL BERMUDA & RYE (lb/acre) = (B)
rn 111 141 1st 161 in altt ant 1101 a l i t
Date
mnJddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib/10o0 gal}
PAN Applied
(tb/acre)
8 x
1 000
Nitrogen Balance'
Qbjecre)
(6) - (10)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
t3) (21
N of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow -ate
{gallmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
{gaUacre)
M
030
a 30
1-1-0bs
/ y o�
E
1
6
172 .s9
23 a
q 3o
I LV
6 f-
/ S 7e
L111 t
Y/
-/L`
lZ3ar
2- 20
/1-0
a "
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Secliori 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (13). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each Irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
�i
:1,,A:• I Facility Number - 3 3
Irrlgation Operator t- y
- irrigation Operal0es t
Address
Operator's Phone # a 2 7_ g/a y 4
• Prom Waste Utilization Plan � ' • ' '
Crop Type Recommended PAR Loading 3 �. 1
li s e r (lblacte} p [tsJ fe !
rr1 111 131 141 Is) _ (81 (7) f81 181 r101 fill
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Form Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
C Field #
a
7 S
i,C1 6
A4 1 Br , y8
1Yc �o e
z- 1. 7- 3
Inlgallon • .
DaleTota
Waste Anatysls PAN'
{ rrlr000 Qaq
PAN Applied
(Wacre)
N"en Salanoe r
(IWacre)
Stad Tlme
/ of Sprinklers
To(G Volume
Vohmie
per Acre
mrNddtyr
End Time
mute
Minutes
operating
flow Rbtd
(tia�+)
[gallons)
(gaGaae)
IH} ■_i91 _
1000
M • (to)
131-(2)
(e}"fsl"(4)
izL,
1,/ { f t,,
ELI
142,7r'J}�
D
l- a 4
] o
L
. C
1.
OOp
a
r
60
ZD)?
.
al�%C
/61 ,S ,
- -
0 0
14
Iq 00
/& 7
/,?
J
6 -71 12
-a/— fF
YOa
Sao_
I
CU.
L? ��
O,E I—
/�-:/•i.J
DLZ-
r6
0 Do
J-O
Pt�'�
0-- - i'
D C 6
q 70 (J•
P
A
%r C. �
l S '7 7, r/3-
r s
a+o
��u
/
/bpi
r
_� ,7r1
2-
'
_LLkp
11-al-17
IIOb
1 au
><Q
40
1 G
3
/SS
Crop Cycle Total@ 1 ' _ 1
Owners Signature _ Operator's Signature
.,.1
Certified Opbralor (Print) Operator's Cerllflca(ion No.
.. r}.•,�I�E1�lij�l�`!'�l,j'h:lFi1•;1;:+ •.ilr.l,il�•,)(:•�1y ri -•rr••
r NCDA Waste Aneylysis or Equival - I rslinm e. 16thnlord (3Ulde A.001• 4- Ai .' ' '
Enter the value toceived by strhr. 10) tram [le). Onntlnuo slit urrin 00) from column (11) follov.
igalion even!.

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields kecdrd
One Form for [Each Field per Crop Cycle
0 Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number
- E
Irrigation Operator c e 4 po
Irrigation Operator's 1?t ,pp / y y
Address '�. t , f w.c, 7 ,?i y
Operator's phone # 7
• Prone Waste Utilization Platt
Clop Type Recommended PAR Loading
CDn_s C r m s< t - (IWaaa) n (B)
ft1 121 0) (41 (5) --.fe) (7) (e) 191 ftal rill
C $3
Meld #
........
..
C d a u u v I
yy-
! �s r!c- ;Z20Y
IS
Dale
-Wddlrr
Irrigation • .
Waste Analysts PAR'
(rw1000 gat)
PAR Applied
(Vacre)
{el! (91
10110
Hlrvgen Balance '
(brace)
(a) - 00)
/7 3,
�-
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) . (2)
of Sprinklers '
�
Opera"
Flow nsld
(gallmin)
Total Voluine
(gallons)
(a) ■ (5) " (4)
Volt"
per Acre
(govocre)
ALL
A
-s -9
ec
,#o
a
31
r/121
_3- L- F.?
/ao
s-0V
do
-7-7-5—
y-�?�3
R
3-4-
30
e,
o
7/6 •yf
-� -
q3o
/SnZq0
23/e�
.7 3
/.9
9,2-1
709,Z
30
ke,
0
/'Slf
1 (
J, 9
2,1-5-44*a-�5
,a
p
23 0.
14F93
7 1-3
I 73,7.6
36
I o
1,to
4 7t 3
9
72-3
! 47-,"�-
a/� 3(I •-) l�
b
e'��..
r.
.fie
-
/� / P •1 Z"
97
3v
,//ScNO
t1,r
_... 231
ou,�v
Ik
o
.ZA
r
1�jo6
,3
H)-
`,a
r~t
,'
d.(ci
3�j•!S
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certiried Operator (Print) Operator's Certincation No.
riy.l:�xs:;l; , 11.1ii •1i:'!11 1 "t,:
t 1.
NCOA Waste Aneylysis or Equivo! -1ri l7slinlata, Ut:Weal :1�
' Enter the value roceived by suhf. 10) huin (11). Cenlinl10 sul urnr► 00) from column (11) follov.
igalion event.

Fonm 1RR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract N
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone N
lb f�a
Field N
4C
, b
C.B.BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
RT 1 BOX 144B
PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
252 827 4342
Facility Number - I EDGEC01t13E
Irrigation Operator C.B.BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
Irrigation Operator's RT 1 BOX 144B
Address PINETOPS, N. C. 27864
Operator's Phone N 252 827 4342
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type necommended PAN Loading
COASTAL BERMUDA & RYE (tblaae) = (B)
rll 171 f'll [Al M% IM M rat
Date
mm/Myr
Irrigation
Waste Analysts PAN'
(IhJ1000 gait
PAN Applied
{1b�ame)
-g1Z 191 -
1000
Nitrogen Balance r
n
(Vae)
(B) (10)
Start time
End Time
Total
M - 1 ,
(3) - (2)
p al Sprinklers
p
Operating
flow nale
(gaVmfn
Total Volume
(gallons)
(B) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gavacra
171 -
J,q
300
o
45
pca
fi
, 0
7�
l 3 o
3 3C
3.%
c �.
- 9 9
a U
Lf 00
6 0
/
6s'
o oFc
t.
ac, y
3` L-
op
L60
6a
/,
17
2-17J2
931,
6 3 0
I,)- 0
Z t; j—
3 r 5
3,
q, u s_
Crop Cycle Totals 1 I 1 1 S• g2" 1
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
= Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-x Lagoon Irrigation Fields aedord
I . One Form for Fach Field per Crop Cycle
YW9
Feclll(y Number 33- �d
Irrigation Operator G ,61 4 Irrigation Operator's r'r r- It% s x/ 4 y ZT
Address
operator's Phone # i 7 yz -
Protln Waste Utilixatlon Plan }
Crop Type fteconmteroded PAN Loading
Co,f V��L + MOM)
lot 121 131 (4) 151 [81 n1 gal rill not girt
Tract #
Field Size (acres) _ (A)
Farm Owner
owner's_ Address
Owner's Phone #
' • Pleld # G.
k/�' l tjo x IQ 9's 1
,-IVC- rjv. Z7 6Y
As1- p2--7- :3 %
c
Hale
mrnldd►yr
Irrigation •- •
,
Walla Analysis PAN'
(FUr1 COO gal)
PAN Applied
llWaae)
lei ` l91
1000
Mlirogen Balarue'
(Wave)
lei • (la}
51art Time
End Time
To1a1
Minute!
t o15 icier!
Sprinklers
c"aling
flow Airld
(gaf>tt�n)
Tole) Votuine
(gallons)
(a) " (5) " (4)
Vok"
per Acre
(gallege)
_ Al
r {y
7
// 70
e
'
6
2-
lQe
oo2
17co
,3
�iY
6 ?17.ok
a 9 7"
7
0,/
r , 91
-2/-
CL
6,
rolo,,'lr{
a-7 -
ao
--!to
o
I
�'9 7-�v
d
G
0
O - ?
oa
r a
0
! �
.2 704
S F2
7
/0 IIA7
Sr0,67-
0-3r-f1�
o0
olio
a
7s'
1,7
��
?$,03
1-1- 91�
ee
o 00
2-
I
ao-3
FfJ
S► I.P
2..9
/-9-f p
7Q()
ev o,
;?4.07
b
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) operator's Cerllficatlon No.
r . � r, •, t:ll{if�I�i trli.i,k'I�i'' 3r: ;, '.t 1.1 )ti' .Ir::i li j •,,r. -
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivn? "�: F.stlnlalA, lechttitlnl c311lde $E�! 1!• •o� f1't�. '
' Enler Ilia value received by suhl. 10) Irom (0). ContlnUO stil innn 00) from column (11) follow
igation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) - (A)
Farm Owner
�i
G
Owner's Address
�+
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number • 3-7
Irrigation Operator c ./ a I~ a k N ;
Irrigation Operator's jf- i Z
Address l„��r r ,✓. �. r y
operator's Phone # -2 f z- Y J V-X-
• Prorh Wasia Utilization Plan -
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
L 0 n J{ r w .4c� (Iblacre) e (8l D►-/0
lit ni 111 141 151 (61 (7) tal (9) lint rill
v -g 3 Pleld #
..._..
4� 96
6 •i 6 G' J 171 41 Al' .•- i
c
Date
mnvddlyr
+ hrigauan ••.
Wastr Analysis PAN
I;i>>t gaR
PAN Applied
(Ib/aae}
IBl • [Bl
1000
N'irogen Balance i
(rblacra)
(B) - (10)
I o
1 0
SIaTt Time
End Time
Total
lulinules
(3) - (2)
# of Sprinklers
operating
flow rt&td
(gaVnihi)
Tolal Volume
(gallons)
(e) w (s) " V4
Voirmie
per Acre
(gavacre)
_ L
a - -z
30
0 o a
& 0
6
at;
3.3`
S b .3 f
3- -6-
36
330
0
1
v L
3, s-i
• a- ti
-
2 c,
3ou
*7
�-• 7
•
r2D
/ ,2q
-a - U
/o a
3) a
c
/•
• 9 Y
/7
3~2 -
l� rp
SIC
3a
J
,� 1Y, 0
N 33
051
z, b
3►
a
1
6 I
1l-IL- V
J a u
0
1 5o
r-
2 %
f
%S • D
3 o o
1
5�
7
�"•
Sl, 1 /
0
33 30
SQ
Sr
7,r
`�
,7
1/17
, .
7 -Y 3• / -7)�Ateo
p
I
(s
"'" zq n
'SF 2 7
11Zo•�
2te I�
0 r I 'A-
L2 V
10 r I
,7s
Crop cycle Total, J 1. - ! .
owner's Slgnalure _ Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) operator's Certification No.
t . r (+ tj(f�l�i"171 )i ire• �1; :� .t }+� (i;' .l t::t li t 'il,:
l NCDA Waste Anaytysis or Equivn! "� rsllnialn, ttrthnid�l L�litdA $f!i li• •ir R'�. '
Enler the value racuived by suhi. M) lydiri III). CunllnuA stil limn 00) from column (11) follov.
igallon event.
i

FORM IRA-2
Tract N
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
t'm
Owner's Phone N
Lagoon -Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
o
Field # .2 r
C.B.BUNTING tx DOUGLAS BUNTING
RT 1 BOX 144B
PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
252 827 4342
Facility Number I :33- w I - EDGECOMBE
Irrigation Operator C.B. BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
Irrigation Operator's RT 1 BOX 144B
Address PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
Operator's Phone ft 252 827 4342
From Waste Utlllzatlon Plan
Crop Type 5 et 0 Ye Recommended PAN Loading r� I y 0
& RYE (tblacre) _ (a)
M rat rot rst IM tit (Al rat tiny till
Date
-Wddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(IbltoUo gal)
PAN Applied
is) x (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Bj - 00)
Start Time
End Time
Tatal
Minutes
M (2i
of sprinklers operating
paling
Row Sale
{ga1/min)
total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
per Aare
(gaVaare}
f71-
A
-1-3
900
1�.a
17r
�s"
.�9�b
63)s
,��
sros-
-5 ,
06
L
?o
:31
- - f
o2 a
S0L`
1 BJ
0
3
. 3f
-1G- S
00
3012
1-a
I -I
fe
.37
741e, ii?
�-� 7- Fr
Poo
a6
Lo
Pd
Z1xt-x
a
732 1
1. 1?- S
�. v
00
o
f
6s'
o
iIL
3
Z- 3-
0 b
e r'
1 r
C,
3- �-
r 1
r 1- !
)t . 03
a-f=
oc
3a�
Lu
4r—
f
-2- -si
3
6 a
/4--
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
i
i NCDA Waste Anaylysls or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guido Sectiori 633,
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.
°x;

FORM IRR-7
Tract #
Field Size (acres) - (A)
a ` Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number r
Irrigation {Operator G ei -,F k k .V 1
Irrigation Operator's If-1 dox 4
• Address ',,i c- . 2 2)2,(
Operator's Phone Al 2 Y-7 3 - i
• Prorh Waste Utillxatloh Plan
Crop Type t 4-: So / Pr% >;eecaTmTrendeaPAN wme) re) 7 y
111 121 (3) M [51 _{eI f1} rill (91 rim rr,t
Field #
-
Pt )30x iq igyn
rNc a .c. 2%
.2-7-q Z L
W
Date
rnrNde
IrTlgatlon
-
Waste Analysis PAN'
lrurt000 goo
PAN
wAacr Ved
r81 • re)r9I
torso
� triven ore}=
igI (t )
7y y 3
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(1)- Iz)
A of Sprinklers
[?peragng
ftow fiild
(low Phi
Total Volume
(gallons)
(e) * (s) • (t)
Votutne
per Acre
(gallaae)
-rat -
-?- I -If
106
3 30
-0
, 7.1
G
0
•4 �-
Crop Cycle Total@
Owner's Signature ? Operator's Signature
Certified Opbrator (Print) operator's Ceruncatlon No.
r r I,
t NCOA Waste Anaylysis or f_quivnt "`: )'stimnld, tatWoal dilide 604'1l (•rr
Enter the value received by suht. 10) from (11). Contlrluts Bill iorrin (10) from column (I j) follov.
igation event.
' �•-.�' `f�=.[!?j'.i�r�?' 'Fix'''' � •

0 1-
FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Plaid Size (acres) - (A)
iFarm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facill(y Number ' _ ..
Irtigatlon Operator I C- ►.-
lrrfgatlon Operator's IT 4- 1 �,X /µq g
Address
Operator's phone # Z R :
pioth Waste Utilization plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading r
(Vocre) c (B) ! 7 6 ri
fit 171 fit f4l 151 let ❑l Is] 19t rrn% rill
/p 3
field #
,d -09 C-11 A 5 tl Pt ✓fl �✓ 1
11 /- / 13 /,/ V1
Irrigation •'.
+�
bare
Waste Ana"Ta PAN'
(1t)/IDOG gal)
PAR AppTled
(Wacae)
NT4vgen gals
(Wo re)
Start Tlme
Total
or SprMkler/ '
total Volume
Vohm�e
per Acre
mrNddryr
End Tlme
Minutes
own"
f km bard
(gaVmin}
(gallons)
(gaUaae)
—leL(9).-
1000
ial - 00)
(s) „ tsJ " t,)
•.tit-
`,�/.yo
A
30
_1s—S�
S^
r
! 'kS'
!±3 7
2--5-
30
1 Lf er8
-3 -9
?
9Yo.-3A
.A-)-G-9F
//gyp
z3a
Ga
!
3,79
737.07
37�4h
hf
737
13.7�
/1—S>'
�o0
3yo
do
s
- {far•
IG
,
31
rfs`
3j�fk
Sec
1110u
Z 1-12
oa '
•Z!
f?, i e
s-
3 -17-
o
D o
6
S'o:
3 SI 6
.3 I
'1 /, 1
I o.
r} o o
�0
1
' 61�
�,a b.
qA I z
7 os',1
3--3
3e(,
Y0-' -
�o
r
a�
�fDb
eD
col,/Ll
v-/ -
a 30
�e
/sue
b
�' '.S-'
b
r
6 1, 67
7 ao
03,
D
`I r
7!
1,
p•OD
6 94t $3
Crop Cycle Totals 1
owner's Signature -� l Operator's Signature
Cerlined Operator (Print) Operator's Certiricatlon No. --
t C.1. ',i lt11��4ditfii.l ;'l )';1;� .1i.4,111• .tT 111 1 +'+1-.
r NCUA Waste Anaylysis or Equivnt "' f'511n1410, technldAl i�tlldef Sl+►11: •1� rti1�:' '
' Enter the value received by Buhl. 10) hottl (d)• CantinUe etil +trnn (10) from column (11) tollov. igallon evenl.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone N
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
o a 3 Field # L:
C.B.BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
RT 1 BOX 144B
PINF.TOPS,N.C. 27864
252 827 4342
Facility Number 1 33-9` 33_ I - I EDGECOPIBE
Irrigation Operator C . B . BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
Irrigation Operator's RT 1 BOX 144B
Address PINETOPS,N.C.. 27864
Operator's Phone!! 252 827 4342
IQ 1 From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type A 6 RYE RecommendedPAN
a)adlg}
!lt M MI. rel Ml rH 171 rill rot 11 nt !ill
oat
mmlddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib11000 gal)(g)
PAN Applied
(Iblacre)
x (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Iblacre)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(0) - (2)
N of sprinklers
pr
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaVmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(geVaae)
t�}
A
/- .x
230
o
b
2Y7s'
S-�4 —
d
41Ji-1
5_71
-I - 9
LID 00
1230
So
S'
2 5-
--IGf'
(.
,! Y
it
7 F I
It 00
130
S-a
6-
.z 7j~
S`x GS-
r o
.)- 1
74(7,
- i P-
1/ 0 p
1 o u
1 )-o
70
Ll
3.39
7Y3, g z
2 -3-
o n
1 z 3u-
ya
17 e
!
, z- r12
3F. 61
- -if
a 70
1&
La
GsrIf
YC
4. L
73r• yo
.2-
r
f-j-
j
GSr
-I -
o u
e o n
,�- a
tP 4'
3.7
7d- 7, us
a -al- SJ
t 30
130
1yo
j
GLlJL
3, 7V
9131 7/
110t,
e0
yo
o
4, X 2-J9
F3
7
71�,9
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
r NCCA Waste Anaylysls or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Sectior1633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each Irrigation event.

Foam Ian-2
Tract H
Fleld Size (acres) = (A)
Fann Owner
�i Owner's Address
In
Owner's Motto 0
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FacilityNumber 33-3 - 1 LI)GLC0tIB
Irrigation Operator C . B . BUNTING & UOUGLAS BUNTING
Irrigation Operator's RT 1 BUX 144B
Address PINETOPS, N . C . 2 7864
Operator's Phone N 252 827 4342
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type necommanded PAN Loading
C�it#3A & RYE (IWacre) - (b)
171 111 M tM (6) r71 fat fql tim (rfr
Field N 1 Z �
C.B.BUNTING & DOUGLAS BUNTING
HT 1 BOX 144B
PINETOPS,N.C. 27864
252 827 4342
barb
mrrJddl
Irdgalion
Waste Annlysls PAN'
(fb11000 gal)
PAN reed
to x
(a) x i9t—
t000
Nitrogen Bac'nce'
f 0
{S) - ( )
Start Time
_
End lime
Total
Minutes
of Sprtrrklers
f yr Irin
p g
now Halo
{gaVmin}
Tolni Volume
(grulons)
(a) x (5) x (4)
volume
per Acre
(gatlocre)
JZL.
-L
c 3 a-1)-
I c
/ 0 6
1
d ra
-S 120
{.
0 ao
1 ?o
10
J'
Ff
-zO-S
0 3c,
L
9 c
V Ff-
3 / 3-Y/f
Sib 9
jo
-2L 9
act
!1a
10
-/6�`
/�p�
%
1?
'tb�
1130
200
_
b Jr—?r
S7. [.Sr
/ ,
, v 7
1�_
_
k—x
;t-ju
23c
-z'
cs�
29123-
,
A-J
I /o
3> 0
/SZI
%
s �C
r
, � 1
J X 3/ 2
e00
7e
1)`z1
6r
2 .75-
1C.
I
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Cert)Ited Operator wrini)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
' NCL)A Wnste Arleytysis or Equivrrtent or NFiCS Estimate, Tochnlcni Guido Secllott 033.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Contlnue subtracting column (10) from colurnn (11) following each Irrigation event.

.iZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, tong, etc. 1
!f?� _animals X 3Zo3 gal. waste/animal/year = 3 G3220Z gals. waste/year.
Amount of _ Plant Available Nitroo en ---(]?AN) Produced Per Year
/1�animals X ,5.4 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 4/z4 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from
N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be crown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
I No. Type ; Per Ac.* Utilized Application
vp
I,
L"03
* This N is from animal waste only. Xf nutrients fron other sources such
as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must
be based on realistic_ yield exoeatat_ion.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996, the Costal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: Z wt n't�-r `�v°f,+f-r wi lj YG�i lLl fC. 30 °'crc5*50
un1�s o� t�k'+roc�(r (kr acrc. 4o a+SPosc p *f ,e- (S3! un,*5 4� N Praoluctz4
a1J�r�+�C `��hlt {Jtfs Q l5 nitd.h,S w�� 0� L�dS 2 4 L4 W"1f VIttJ 46
5c.edL4 to S...e (( gr4ih a.,� ` test's �rrvj4(, W4 {or .

ivision of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review ";A Z
'
Ilivistoii of Soil aiiid Water Conservation Compliance Inspection r,x, � �4A
Q Divisiodof Water Quality - Comphince,Irispectionr �
-..
Q Other Agency =Operation Review-,.',"r
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DS`VC review 0 Other
a Facilitv Number G
Date of Inspection 1711 -7 -7
? - Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Q Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: �.J. �:..��.............................................................................................. County: ......................................................................._.............
OwnerName.................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilitvContact:.......................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .......... '....`: ' G........Integrator:....................................... ...............................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude +=' =.,
Design Current
- J]7l l l?
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude = • =° = l{
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I&
T
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar yes & Stream Imttacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11 No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other �/
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made•? ❑ Yes 0 No
r 1
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach 'V'ater of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated now in gal/rein?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes',❑ No
'. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑'No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes allo
1
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure ti
Identifier: ,,q/f `y t ,y�'GLL '5 / G! I ! (A
Freeboard(inches): ..................... ....... ... ........ .. �.. ..�.......... .........✓.L ................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes UNo
seepage, etc) J
3/23/99 Continued vn back

/-:`4
Wacility Number: ")'Z — C- Date nl' Inspection 1/7/%
.
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑-No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑'No
Al +t/ j v' P Tn P tZ' d PG fib L'i N's
8. Does any part or the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes OlNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? El Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [l No
i
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes El No
12. Croptype A L '
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [9No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wcttabie acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes 0;O
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes )Z1No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes &No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
ENo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
ElYes
19. Does record keeping need` improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ,E!rNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ONO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ONo
i
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes [�No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes [ No
1
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑•No
�'Vo yigla>jicjns:o:r deficiencies were iti►ted dit "'this:visitT :Y:ojr Will-teeeNi6 Rio: further: ;
rorresoridence. abou this visit: :. ... :: ..
Comments (refer'to!question #): Explain any YES answers and/or'any recommendations or, any, other comments '
as ssasa
Use drawuigs of faceltty to better explaEn.situations. (use additional pages necesry}
2-� car��S alv A r d
t~
qAL/2
Reviewer/Inspector Name�WA161)9C�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:/'J /,�A�, OJT a Date: `7 4�h 7
3/23/99

•
'Facility Number:' _) — I', Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes V0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? ((
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes /00
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [�10
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or //
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ONo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes'.�dNo
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 91,110
A61
3/23/99

Routine O C;om taint O Fulinw-u c►I' DVN ins ection O Follow-u p of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection p
Time of inspection P4RZ4 hr. (hh:mm)
13Registered O Certified O Applied for Permit [] Permitted IDNot Operational Date Last Operated:
..........................
FarmName................................{ r....... ��1.......................... ... ....... ...... County: .... 1 1jo 4�...........................
OwnerName'........................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative:_. &.�t......... iiijrl .... : "' ... Integrator: ..../$G r.,t 1,-�..-..�.......................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................ .......... Operator Certification Number:.................
Location of Farm.
Latitude • 6 °' Longitude 0 "
Design -.Current Design Current
Swine_-,, Capacity : Population ., Poultry Capacity . Populat�ori'. Fettle
rre4 F
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ';, ❑ Nan-Dairy
Farrow to Wean 0
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish TUAI Design CapaClty
❑ Gilts
❑ soars Tots! SSLW.0
• wsw 5
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds; ❑ Subsurt'ace Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Feld Area
r ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancetimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
71►SI97
❑ Yes 1 No
❑ Yes )2�No
❑ Yes �o
El Yes :YNo
❑ Yes ):2rNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No

Facility Number.-
� �—
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,fiolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.l
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Structure 4
StfucLure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ..........................................................
1 . Ael
�.t.. ..... ..........��
.
�....4� ...
........... I ............... I.......
1. ) �,�1
Freeboard(ft): ....... :.. .................... ,...............
,...............,
.,................,......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ❑ 'o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes ZNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ONO
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes/6No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
In
15. Crop type S, x'T.if...........................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes allo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ YesNo
r
Yes
No
X
❑ Yes
dNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? 5 e E- 7J 3
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
El No.violations or. deficiencies were noted during this.:Visit. You will receive no ftirther
Ofrespondence: about this visit,;
❑ Yes P No
❑/Yes /❑ No
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes ,�] No
❑ Yes A No
'2r'�,
,vim ����"►U,,c� J ,� Ein�`��(/l/ _ � S � #� � , � �2 1 �--
G 7/25/97

i State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 29, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RE EIPT REQUESTED
C. B. Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Rt 1 Box 144-B
Pinetops NC-27864
Farm Number: 33 - 4
Dear C. B. Bunting:
'TJ."'VWA
/ •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
7`--r'----1- li
I
L JUN
I _
+off NR 1WEI ; r
You are hereby notified that Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.1 OC, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of
this letter, your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting
documentation. in accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996),
Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by
the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your
application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application, before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
Sincerely,
4., A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer. 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 21, 1998
C.B. Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Rt 1 Box 144-B
Pinetops NC 27864
Subject:
Dear C.B. Bunting:
NC�4
NORTH IN D�}}A�ito_u_�_Ca
Or 1
ENVIRONMEN 41 U.
Application No. 33-0004
Additional Information Request
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the
subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please
address the following by August 20, 1998:
1) As required by item 3.3.12 of the Non -Discharge Permit Application Form for General
Permit- Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations, please submit the Insect Control
Checklist for this facility.
2) As required by item 3.3.13 of the Non -Discharge Permit Application Form for General
Permit- Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations, please submit the Odor Control
Checklist for this facility.
3) As required by item 3.3.14 of the Non -Discharge Permit Application Form for General
Permit- Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations, please submit the Mortality Control
Checklist for this facility.
4) The irrigation parameters listed in your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) exceed current
MRCS recommendations. Irrigation events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum
application allowable for that soil type from the time the pumps are turned on until the time
they are shut off. The application events listed in your WUP appear to be out of the
Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide have not been
adjusted for the application of animal waste. NRCS currently recommends that total
application amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. If your
application rates need to be adjusted for the application of animal waste, please have your
Technical Specialist revise your WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per
event. If the rates exceed the recommended one inch, please have your Technical
Specialist justify the increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before August 20,
1998 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 33-0004
C.B. Bunting
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension
362.
Sincerely,
/- I
Michael T. Lewandowski, PE
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor 1DF.=HNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 28, 1997
Mr. Doug Bunting
Route 1, Box 144-B
Pinetops, North Carolina 27864
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 33-04
Bunting\Grant Farm
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Bunting:
On July 22, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster 'Dowell at [phone].
S.incerely
4,z,
J y Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A.B. Whitley,' Edgecombe Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, N%q
FAX [phone]
RaleighNorth Carolina 27609C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

-ZZ-
Facility Number Date of Inspection Q ''
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Registered ❑ Applied for Permit ex:L25 for I hr 15 min Sent on Review T3
Farm Status:. (' )) P'
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and nrocessinw)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .... ._!..�.d!a....12.f...l!?.f........%1!va--............_......, County:.L o� 1a �
.......................
Land Owner Nam
e:nGi...[7........ KlKrr.7:/Jlzd......
_..........................._.............. . Phone No: ......1./.�1.. ��T»..q:3...f..z...................
Facility Conctact:....V..Q..gg. .......�FC. ....T..!.(/........ Title:.... - ................ Phone No:... <rzb....r........... _.................
Mailing Address: .... g.4...... ..... G.r..x........� ....tl......... !. !_ T.Y�� S .......... .......... 7.f6..Y............ _....... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .... ? ....................................... Integrator: ........ Dk..c.:.:-Lfl;.............................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude Longitude 0'0.0«
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Continued on back

1Facility umber:...`,.... -.±.. ....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 0NO
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
ytructutes (Lagoons and/or,flolding Poud5)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o
Freeboard (ft): Structured Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
........ . . . ..... ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? El YesFo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of��,W__M__P,,]]orW
runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type?1�.I. . . r............................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes l�'No
17. Does the facility have a lack.of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ YesVNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
For_Cerfi ied Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? [:]Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name .'"
„-^
`'s
t..'{` '
��' E','
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
_ �f �
�y
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Y" Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional.Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEF.HNF;Z
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 13, 1997
Mr. Douglas Bunting
Rt. 1 Box 144-B
Pinetops, NC 27864
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summaries and Corrective Action Recommendations for
Bunting Swine Farm -Grant
Facility No. 33-4
Bunting Swine Farm -Manning
Facility No. 33-23
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Bunting,
On April 29, Operation Reviews were conducted of the above mentioned farms. These Reviews,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD, are one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal were properly maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator. Copies of the completed review forms are
enclosed for your information. The following items were discovered and noted for corrective action or
response:
Start and stop pump markers were not present at either site. As discussed, these markers need
to be installed upon completion of lagoon construction work.
On the Manning farm, the Ia oon had a large hole, erosion on the sides and an uneven berm.
These will need to be fixed following the construction plan currently being developed by the NRCS.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with these Operation Reviews.
Please do not hesitate to call meat 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concems or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Margaret O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, 5ulte 101, 'Is' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NJAn Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Douglas Bunting
Bunting Swine Farm - Grant
Rt 1 Box 144-B
Pinetops NC 27864
IDEHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Bunting Swine Farm - Grant
Facility ID#: 33-4
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Bunting:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue t6 be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr.,�M�.,Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc. Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, ft.
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina I MAI
Department of Environment, 3 'V
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., r ry ID E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 3, 1995
C. B. Bunting
Rte. 1, Box 144E
Finetops, NC 27684
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Swine Operations
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Bunting:
On July 17, 1995, Mr. Shane McCarthy, and on July 27, 1995,
Mr. Ted Cashion, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted
compliance inspections of the subject animal facilities. These
inspections are a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. McCarthy's site visits determined that wastewater from
your facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the
State. Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
Mr. Cashion's site visits determined that wastewater from the
Mildred site was discharging to surface waters of the State.
Discharges to surface waters of the State from other sites were
unable to be confirmed at this time.
As a result of the inspections, the following management
deficiencies were observed:
1. Cabell Farm location:
-A pen containing pigs, located behind the houses did not have
a system in place to handle wastewater. Animals in this pen
must be removed immediately or a proper waste management
system installed.
-A valve located at one of the pumping pits behind the houses
was found, which if used, would allow wastewater to be
discharged. Use of this valve would be a violation and
subject to the penalties stipulated above. This valve should
be removed to prohibit any future discharge.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101. Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 1 0% post -consumer paper

Mr. Bunting
August 3, 1995
Page 2
2. Dirt Road Farm:
-Wastewater was observed running off your application field.
Liquid waste should be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application.
-A drag line was in operation at the time of inspection
digging out a lagoon. If this lagoon is going to be utilized
as part of your waste management system, then its construction
must be approved and included in your waste management plan.
3. Mildred, NC site:
- Both of the lagoons have recently been dug out, with the
material, along with the settled sludge, piled beside each
lagoon. Stockpiling of sludge is not an acceptable method of
disposal.
- Sandy soil was evident in the stockpile beside each lagoon.
We are concerned that the liner of each lagoon may have been
disturbed in the process of digging, causing the lagoon to
leak and contaminate groundwater.
- The sprayfield was severely ponded, with runoff to an
adjacent drainage ditch apparent. horses were in the
sprayfield, which will compact the soil and impede
infiltration of the wastewater into the soil.
4. SR 1204 site:
- a swine nursery area had waste flowing off site and into a
natural drainage area. This waste must be contained and
disposed of in the lagoon.
- The spray field at the rear of the facility was ponded with
wastewater. The natural drainage of this site conveys the
ponded wastewater off site into drainage ditches. The cover
crap needs to be cut and removed from the field.
- One of the 5 lagoons at this site had a freeboard of
approximately 6 inches. This office recommends that a minimum
of 24 inches of freeboard be maintained in lagoons at all
times.

Mr. Bunting
August 3, 1995
Page 3
5. SR 1200 site:
- This area is extremely grown up. Unable to confirm
freeboard or integrity of lagoons. 2 lagoons located at this
site. It appears that these lagoons do not offer sufficient
storage capacity for this size operation.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of additional illegal discharges to surface waters of
the State. The Raleigh Regional Office will require a written
response to each of the aforementioned issues within .20 days of
receipt of this letter. You should specifically address how you
plan to correct these problems and submit a schedule (with dates)
stating when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
Due to wastewater runoff from the Mildred, NC site reaching
surface waters of the State this office will recommend to the
Director of the Division that the deemed permitted status of this
facility be revoked.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office also reminds you that you are required to have an
approved animal waste management plan by December 1997. This plan
must be certified by a designated technical specialist or a
professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical
specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you
should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
Mr. Bunting

August 3, 1995
Page- 4
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections
please call Ted Cashion at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation -District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\bunting.ins

I
NARRON, HOLDFORD, BABB, HARRISON &
WILLIAM H. HOLDFORD
HENRY C. BABB, JR.
R. WOODY HARRISON. JR
THOMAS J. RHODES
C. DAVID WILLIAMS, JR.
1. JOE IVEY
B. PERRY MORRISON. JR.
WILLIAM L. O'OUINN, JR.
FACSIMILE (919-571-4718)
AND U.S. MAIL
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
204 NORTH TARBORO STREET
DRAWER 279
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894r0279
TELEPHONE (919) R37-3153
TELECOPIER (9191 243-1733
Regional Supervisor
N. C. Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
August 25, 1995
4
RHODES,�P. P.A. {j ��/99
TALMADGE L. NARRON
0925-1976) _ _J
OF COUNSEL
ROGER L. YOUNG
RE: Our Client: C. B. Bunting, Jr.
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification, Swine Operations, Edgecombe County
NHBHR 95-657
Dear Mr. Schuster:
This letter is in response to your letter dated August 3, 1995 citing our clients, C. B. Bunting &
Sons, for alleged non-compliance with unspecified DEHNR regulations.
The Bunting family agrees that in light of recent events the DEHNR should assist all swine
operations in complying with state regulations. The Buntings would appreciate any assistance you may
provide which would help them to comply. Your specific citations are responded to as follows:
Problem: A pen containing pigs having no wastewater system.
Response: These were temporary pens on grass which were only used temporarily while
constructing a new offsite Nursery Complex, now operational.
Corrective Action: The Buntings have discontinued the use of these pens as planned on
August 2, 1995. There are no future plans to use these pens.
Problem: A valve was located at one of the pumping pits behind the houses.
Response: The valve in question was installed before the Buntings purchased the farm. They
have never used the valve, and do not recall its presence.
Corrective Action: The Buntings have elbowed and capped this line so no water can flow.

Problem: Wastewater observed running off application field.
Response: The Buntings agree that their method of application could be improved. Even
though the application rates may not be as desired, the Buntings maintain that the
runoff was = leaving their property.
Corrective Action: They will begin to apply waste with their irrigation reel until they can get a
competitive bid for the solid set irrigation. The Buntings expect to have this
system in place by January 1, 1996. They will also begin landscaping the lagoon
and seeding it so that it will be easier to maintain.
Problem: A drag line in operation digging out a lagoon.
Response: The Buntings have spent a great deal of money within the last year trying to get
the lagoons in good shape. They also are seeking an environmental consultant
to assist them in getting certified by January 1, 1997.
Corrective Action : The Buntings are having difficulty locating an environmental consultant to
assist them. Apparently, most reputable consultants are busy with more
demanding cases at this time.
Mildred Farm (NOTE: Only approximately 500 pigs [10-40 lbs.] are present on this farm. The
Buntings will consider reducing this number to less than 250.)
Problem: Sludge piled beside each lagoon.
Response: After the spill in Onslow County, the Buntings took the initiative to remove the
sludge from the lagoon. The sludge cited had recently been removed. They plan
to apply the sludge in the spray field. w
Corrective Action: The Buntings will landscape the lagoon and seed it for easier maintenance.
Problem : Sandy soil in the sludge pile.
Response: The Buntings examined the subject soil. Most of the pile was sludge. Once
again, they were attempting to maintain their lagoons as to not risk the type of
break in Onslow County. 1 i Itcr w-r � c c4 b fr„r

Corrective Action: They will spread sludge in the spray field area and landscape the lagoon.
Problem: The spray field was ponded with runoff to an adjacent drainage ditch. Horses
were in the spray field.
Response: The Buntings contend that there is no ditch in that area. Four days later, the area
had dried. They examined the property area where water could run off. They
had constructed two dams several years ago to prevent runoff . The Buntings
contend that no wastewater ran off the spray field or off the puddling area thought
to be a ditch. The horses did not belong to the Buntings, but they will make
certain the horses do not enter the spray field in the future.
Corrective Action: The Buntings will begin applying wastewater with their irrigation reel.
They will spread the sludge in the spray field and disk the sludge in, then chisel
the land to aerate the soil.
S. R. 1204 Site
Problem: Swine Nursery area had waste flowing offsite into a natural drainage area.
Response: The Buntings could find no evidence of this problem. An employee reports that
the drain area had stopped up and a small amount seeped out. There appears to be
no physical evidence of the seepage. See. 1 'tL're x
Corrective Action: The employee had already corrected the problem. Further, the Buntings
use the nursery boxes less and less with the construction of the new offsite
nurseries.
Problem: The spray field at the rear of the facility was ponded with wastewater.
Response: The spray field apparently does have some puddling. The Buntings have been
containing the wastewater on site.
Corrective Action: The Buntings will begin using the irrigation reel on the spray field. They
will cut and remove the cover crop off the field. A solid set irrigation system will
be installed as soon as competitive bids are received. Wv e" �
Problem: A free board of approximately eight inches in one of the six lagoons.

Response: The Buntings do not disagree. Only about 200 animals feed at this lagoon. When
the lagoon fills up, they use a lift pump to pump into the lagoon on the opposite
side of the house.
Corrective Action: They will begin their irrigation reel on this lagoon first. When the solid set
is installed, they plan to pipe this lagoon to the second stage lagoon on the other
side.
S. R. 1200 Site
Problem: This area is extremely grown up. Only two lagoons located. C4ae � A. ub.
Response: This operation does not have two lagoons. It has four lagoons. The site has 4,650
total pigs. There are approximately five acres of lagoons which are fairly deep.
There are 200 clear land acres on which to pump. The Buntings continue to use
the irrigation reel on this farm.
Corrective Action: The banks will be sloped, seeded, and mowed on a regular basis.
The Buntings share your concern regarding wastewater treatment and facilities stewardship.
Generally, the Buntings will make a serious effort to landscape, seed, and mow around all lagoons. They
are working to remedy every deficiency which has been brought to their attention and are doing
everything they can to bring their operations into compliance. We would appreciate your assistance in
that respect.
HCBjrlmw
I have reviewed the above and verify it is my response to the letter I received on August 8, 1995 from
Kenneth Schuster, Regional Supervisor of the Division of Environmental Management.
G3ec -h e.,y- R!!�Je)
C. B. Bunting,` r
C:IWPDATA18CBN W388LT. HCB

Response: The Buntings do not disagree. Only about 200 animals feed at this lagoon. When
the lagoon fills up, they use a lift pump to pump into the lagoon on the opposite
side of the house.
Corrective Action: They wi11 begin their irrigation reel on this lagoon first. When the solid set
is installed, they plan to pipe this lagoon to the second stage lagoon on the other
side.
Problem: This area is extremely grown up. Only two lagoons located.
Response: This operation does not have two lagoons. It has four lagoons. The site has 4,650
total pigs. There are approximately five acres of lagoons which are fairly deep.
There are 200 clear land acres on which to pump. The Buntings continue to use
the irrigation reel on this farm.
Corrective Action: The banks will be sloped, seeded, and mowed on a regular basis.
The Buntings share your concern regarding wastewater treatment and facilities stewardship.
Generally, the Buntings will make a serious effort to landscape, seed, and mow around all lagoons. They
are working to remedy every deficiency which has been brought to their attention and are doing
everything they can to bring their operations into compliance. We would appreciate your assistanec in
that respect.
HCB}r/mw
I have reviewed the above and verify it is my response to the letter I received on August 8, 1995 from
Kenneth Schuster, Regional Supervisor of the Division of Envirumutntal Management.
- - -��
10WOMP-4-
CAWK*TA%WCMmW3IILT.HC8
TOTAL P.05