190035_PERMIT FILE_20171231

I4,leno IUIuawuoainu3 jo luoujedaa
- - - -

e
s
w
o
S
c
Q
'c
C,, f
n
t
�
C
�1

ra
Juc�:!+t� `� r� �U '� ♦B1 AY1
(.rtAb� hA�11 �-•�ZM `�7?�0�

W services.
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
rp -rru.. ,our nar,. �, . ad ., ,rw reverse of this form so that we can return this
extra fee):
m card to you.
o ■ this roan to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
gym„
■ Write'Rewm Recef Requested' on the mailptece below the article number.
m a
2. ❑Restricted Delivery
m
y
-S ■The Retum Receipt will stow to whom the article was delivered and the date
S
delivered.
Consult postmaster for fee.
O
I m 3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
j i Mr HAROLD COMCIDIAN
P 281 512 138
I E CCMCIL"1AN DAIRY FAFli
4b. Service Type
I c°+ 180E F+�q-TD SC . r ROAD
❑ Registered Certified
=I
EW.R CFI NC 27207
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
Pi
m
Nt�VRI�P FARM NO IJ-35
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandse ❑ COD
L I
7 Date of Delivery
.21
C[iATHAti CO 1/17/96 TC/KS
5. Received By: (Print Name) S. Addressee's Address (Only if requested
and fee is paid)
3 6. Signature: (Addressee or Agent)
T O
r0
1 + PS Form Ill1, Debember 1994 Domestic Retum Recei

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
• Print your name, address, and ZIP "a in
ii4tll 4t

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
ir and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Rd
Bear Creek NC 27207
Dear Harold Councilman:
1 Q
AM
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 22, 1999
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC190035
Councilman Farms
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Chatham County
In accordance with your application received on July 30, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Archie & Harold Councilman, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from Councilman Farms, located in Chatham County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 140 Dairy Cows and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC 190035
Councilman Farms
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
Ken T.Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
ChathamCounty Health Department
�l Office, Wc%gr ibif'
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
nrY 7 6 90A

--- State of North. Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources WA r E q'Ei ��O
Division of Water Quality rr81C
Non -Discharge Permit ,Application Form Jul .3
('PHIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR VSE AS AN ORIGINAL) 01999
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations 1Vnn.p1Schgpge P
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please ?Ig
review the information for completeness and matte any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
] A Facility Name: Councilman Farms
1.2 "t Land owner's name; Archie & Harold Councilman
1.3 Mailing address: 1806 Ronald Scott Rd
City, State: Bear Creek NC Zip: 27207
Telephone Number (include area code): 910.581-3633
1.4 County where facility is located: Chatham
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified). Couury Road 231 B - approx. M2 mi. north of ki.
Hwy 42.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's same (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/57
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(a) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _ 19 (county number); `35 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descripts n Cattle operation
.>Seuy
140- Certified Design Capacity
1s the above information correct.) [Zyes; no. if no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num r or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
o Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Type of Foultry No. of Animals TYPO of Cattle No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Non -Layer o Beef
0 Turkey
FORM: ,A►WO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 19 - 35
No. of Animals:

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 289 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWNIP): 62
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 1_
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within I W of any of the application fields? YES o NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST --
Please indicate that you have included the fallowing required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - AnimalL��
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied; 4(bald /a&ago it ea-&Id4i ;W amp
3.3 Two copies of the entire Cardfled Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMp must include the followaag components. Some of These components may nor
have been required at the time the facility was cerry7ed but should be added to the
CAWW for permirring purposes:
- 3.3.1 The Wastt Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of r1agt Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. M ffl�
3.3.2 The method b� which waste is applied to tl�c disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc. " w-o"L " per»
-3.3.3 A map of every field used for a i3 application
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field. •;- ►+► -& ­+-p .. J P4"-
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every clop shown in the WUP. 4..
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. O "p,�
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utiliz in the WEEP. i.n �p�- "`a^"d'�""$ 1^'-"
3.3.9 The required NRCS Stands specifications. +pt wsa a r—ft%1t~ � P""'
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action plan. QQ x"
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 4:.4-.L+d
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. M 4J .&(a
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility. 6;e1% wa
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan_
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/2408
Page 2 of 4 19 - 35
TIBIA 2292 Tag N"IW1I 3WnO3 GION"N 6Z S e T 3nl 66-go-ant

Facility Number: 19 - 35
F act 'I• N C ce•hnan Farms
Wg7l'� CFI RFD
ity ame. ounl)1,gRCnOIV
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: No^ DI U( 3 0 1999
x
1, ffi4 /L01-b L C p U 4 Gt L MA ILJ (Land Owner's name listed in . 2), at that
this application for C D LL nl c r L M .4 J �q JeL. rn. C (Facility name listed in question 1. I )
has been reviewed by me and accurate an complete to a st o my owledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be tune to me,, ,a�s incomplete. �//��
Signature �r51AtN.Yrw�� Date �� 9
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewedby me an is accurate an compete to a best o my knowledge. I un etstand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 19 - 35

Lltt
Anhill Waste Management Plan Cer Nication
(Please type or print all information that does not require aRECEIVED
vi-M, nr NeW tir`' .F.xnaniled frilease circle onA _
NameofFarm: (-CONK/LNlft/V t/TaC/Vts AA43*46N% w�_
Owner(s) Name: At> r- e / !da ro lam./ e�% &,V cl GM.4i1 / Phone No: 9io- 5 8 /- .3932L
Mailing Address: / gO(e Ror✓a U 5"7Y- AzA 9&RR c42f,e Z 92 0 7
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:_ 03 O 3 0D0 3 oS400 / O
Latitude and Longitude: a�LL_ l -72eA2 ' '7 County: CA44 TW,4A
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): ARAn /ecg-rGD -y 1 .5R z. 3 / Q /-d'e
-3 ry" /.s .S to D F IAI ec75 o t Asti r1 9 o z ,F- a,4 -2 .i / g .
02eration Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of le No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer airy 140
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Pullets 0 Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 201 Required Acreage: lv 2—
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds :_L Total Capac' : A q, 3 Q Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that runoff of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Lan wner :
Signature:_ c Date: /0 - /
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- April 24, 1996 1

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission
pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm
named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specificatior
of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical
specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only
certify parts for which they are technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) olle2jion. Storage. Treatment S151gm
Check t e appropriate box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with
waste utilization requirements.
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems,
lagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and
specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): o ,; -./�•. _ _
Affiliation:
Address (Agency):
Signature:
ne No.
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulc and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
designed in accordance with technical sta,pdardAdevploped by N,LtCS„ t
Name of Techn
Affiliation:
Address(Agenc
Signature:
AWC -- April 24, 1996

D) Application and Handling Equil2ment
Check the appropriate box
0" Existing facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as pan of the
plan).
New or expanded facility: or existing facility without existing waste application equipment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specked hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Sh e , Lc A . J1 r Jo
Affiliation: hi.9efG, rn,,-t I i o % i�r..e.nr•rerft"te. r-)(krn<iL' ll crviczfllnrn
Address(Agency): A C. 6 /Y I7e?� H'� i c• i U L 7,731 L Phone No.: 512
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility_ (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24, 1996

B) Land A nnlication Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
W
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the
cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the
owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by
(month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the waste
utilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared
land within 30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim
crop for erosion control; In
Name of TechnricallI (Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: flf'hA m 9�0
Address(AQencv):.,f
Signature:
This following signature block is
above has been checked.
used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste
utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to
DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date
specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a
violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signatu
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Date:
Signature: Date:
'WWRTet 01130171M,
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
installed as specified in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation:_ 0-k-r�-
hone No.
Signature:
Date:
AWC -- April 24, I996 4

D) A2111ication and Handling Eauioment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approvalAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):. 5 h t i I.- A . do , d e, h
Affiliation: A)C c t h 06 k- n h n et & k fen5 t rr, Je r v i a- 010-tlle, i h eQ t, n:k-
Address(Agency): P.L. 174 rF, rt36 c c IJL 173 1 Z Phone No.: 5-42 -31t. 2-
Signature: , S_1, r_�(, G 9 ..4 Date: 121411q 7
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specked in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Name of Manager(if different from
Date:
Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- April 24,1996

J1. .. _. ...._.______—__...._ .... .. ..
Location: / UW Karta(td -V-oft Kd . _ (-,)qZ z0
Telephone: 0 10 581 j - 31a 3 3 . on.0 �U I `3 S�er��N
p 1999
Type Operation: D.;
Number of Animals: f 4n Lbws
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. soil types are important as they have different
.infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not.'allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
1

r
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

0
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, fO, tons, etc.)
140 q�L
animals X ?7(amt.) waste/animal/year =
(amt.) waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
)40 animals X�lbs. PAN/animal/year = O lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for.waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
—
r
r
F—P-1
s�": W A
RA-
t.
Total I oWA_ I
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and S may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some easter72 counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
3

IL
Y, z
vsu
Expos kxre
,j
4
^AOV
# Of

MEW-
'IF'r
Tt.
ri e` W 5f
'nf , ✓ ` f1 t:.ic pert .-qd yy �,"� rt {1-; ���W. �� rl _
't
t3 1N
N
Y
'.� t3 ..�. R li+br'��r x�n.�, *,afy',�i,.. s`t ,�'� •e J �.? b a2
w
c y,
�3199 29NA
r r v+ y yc
t y\ 4� �bl� kr ^��.4''•w rye_ �, .rt �{?+ r
a
Ex os�re ' � #.:of
P �t �<
•., FArms

.tfiat
a tl r Mr« t'�x+(
41,
PollY _ 'XM Byer! / Vly�r x r.g.,'(yv¢ SW/Fyy�r.
,aJ•Yr,
i fit it ry { P ♦ dd��I F'I.n�.7.c k.� h^'^V' }l�,f, �1}� C! f sc
N xY
.iA{ i c W •: I yTS +cN� .A _ ��' i.^i� .r��'f. l' ^I'' nyl {" f-uS n
pt q c�,, ..4"P i .F(�r �jf'•LI YCF y, f y, .<*§m".:i�l� `Rc r(� .
ci � lw �u f�4f ._ rw Z ,y.Yi♦C Ii1 x �" dFj 1 " 7P r/fis`°Fg) t�'�r$tl'. �c� i�� �l
�4 1 Y4 j ��ib� f 2,rr �' }, ! L 1��: 1 1'!♦
t c L ��;., 1J Ir 1 $ : h Y Ya• of :aFy s� 1 r ..
^4v ♦$�_�M � �'i t ♦
f'1 • J

; i "fi ' � I r
�� << /44:
t
lot
4 la
a7 r^ ? pf n
s aL J r r _
,y t
y�„w,+��'~, „� _ , jl�,,�,�• 3 D i3 �_�s /.�lo �i!Pr�. � �" �91. �\ m, ' f
a h a le, N-f n ` { I 12.1 _ _.d3.
M ) wP
i
li 11
is
i
Expostxre
#of

r � [
440
tZr
��» y Tr �� k ,vr i.�� � y �� �� t 4 �•n� + cif
4,.�. . � �yti� � �. �,:t wn�i�{��"1' ��19r �'�"'�"�` s �yS, �•% "'�J�' ' "` ,. F
cn r 17,,rJ � i� A tary.*�' +r S ,p'.+ a• tl¢F:. �S ' �i
CO
t i+'
ora
t
CP
ti
f,
It
= f
� l ._ ..,.•+ems '� `r� � -
L" _
R Exposuxre �nrrnS
IF
^El .

Table 2: ACRES 4116N b
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only it operator does not ors
adequate land (see Required Specification sl)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
See footnote for Table 1.
Total
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 � 5I 51
Table 2
Total asq.q'1
Amount of N Produced l0_11!o
Surplus or efics
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.

Your facility is designed for days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
�. MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation q4,1
,a
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (fa=erly soil
canservat.i= service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
(use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)
1 i
1 ,
I ► `•
(YL�-,cx# o P�P�I + emirf�Ar''f) &4J 110rf67 WAq

NITROGEN APPLICATION RATE CALCULATED USING SOIL TYPE
AND REALISTIC YIELD TABLE
SOIL TYPE 130B (Nason)
Appl. Date
130E
- Oats for grain - 91 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
130B
- Wheat for grain - 108 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
130E
- Corn for grain - 113 The N/ac
Feb -June
130E
- Corn for silage - 216 The N/ac
Feb -June
130E
- Sorghum for grain - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
130E
- Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
130B
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 165 The N/ac
Feb -July
130B
- Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
130E
- Fescue for hay = 150 lbs.N/ac
Feb=June,Aug-Dec
130E
- Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
130E
- Small Grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 130C (Nason)
Appl. Date
130C
- Oats for grain - 85 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
130C
- Wheat for grain - 108 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
130C
- Corn for grain - 106 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
130C
- Corn for silage - 204 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
130C
- Sorghum for grain - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
130C
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
130C
- Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
130C
- Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
130C
- Fescue for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
130C
- Orchardgrass for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
130C
- Small Grain for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL TYPE 205E (Georgeville)
Appl. Date
205B
- Oats for grain - 104 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
205E
- Wheat for grain - 132 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
205B
- Corn for grain - 119 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
205B
- Corn for silage - 228 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
205B
- Sorghum for grain - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
205B
- Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
205B
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
205E
- Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
205B
- Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
205B
- Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
205B
- Small Grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL TYPE 205B2 (Georgeville)
Appl. Date
205B2
- Oats for grain - 85 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
205B2
- Wheat for grain - 96 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
205B2
- Corn for grain - 94 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
205B2
- Corn for silage - 180 The N/ac
Feb -June
205B2
- Sorghum for grain - 113 The N/ac
Feb -June
205B2
- Soybeans - 140 The N/ac
Feb -July
20SB2
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
205B2
- Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
205B2
- Fescue for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
205B2
- Orchardgrass for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
205B2
- Small Grain for hay - 125 The N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec

SOIL
TYPE 205C (Georgeville)
Appl. Date
205C
- Oats for grain - 91 The N/ac
Aug -Dec, Feb -June
205C
- Wheat for grain - 108 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec',Feb-June
205C
- Corn for grain - 106 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
205C
- Corn for silage - 204 The N/ac
Feb -June
205C
—Sorghum for grain - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
205C
- Soybeans - 140 The N/ac
Feb -July
205C
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 154 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
205C
- Sudangrass for hay - 154 The N/ac
Feb -July
205C
- Fescue for hay - 140 The N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
205C
- Orchardgrass for hay - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
205C
- Small grain for hay -'140 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 51B (Helena)
Appl. Date
51B
- Oats for grain - 85 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
51B
- Wheat for grain - 100 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
51B -
Corn for grain - i.QO The N/ac
Feb -June
51B
- Corn for silage - 192 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
51B
- Sorghum for grain - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
SIB -
Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
51B
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 193 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
51B -
Sudangrass for hay - 193 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
51B -
Fescue for hay - 175 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
512
- Orchardgrass for hay - 175 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
51B
- Small grain for hay - 175 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 30B (Cecil')
Appl. Date
30B
- Oats for.grain - 117 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
30B
- Wheat for grain - 156 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
30B
- Corn for grain - 119 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
30B
- Corn for silage - 228 Ibs N/ac
Feb -June
30B
- Sorghum for grain - 163 Jbs N/ac
Feb -June
30B
- Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
30B
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 176 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
30B
- Sudangrass for hay - 176 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
30B
- Fescue for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
30B
- Orchardgrass for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
30B
- Small grain for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 37B (Wedowee)
Appl. Date
37B
- Oats for grain - 104 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
37B
- Wheat for grain - 132 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
37B
- Corn for grain - 100 lbs. N/ac
Feb -June
37B
- Corn for silage - 192 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
37B
- Sorghum for grain - 175 The N/ac
Feb -June
37B
- Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
37B
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
37B
- Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
37B
- Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
37B
- Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
37B
- Small grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 212B (Herdon)
Appl. Date
212B
- Oats for grain - 104 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb -June

212E
- Wheat for grain - 132 This N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
212B
- Corn for grain - 119 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
212B
- Corn for silage - 228 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
212B
- Sorghum for grain - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
212E
- Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
212B
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
212E
- Sudangrass for hay -.165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
212B
- Fescue for hay - 150 The N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
212B
- Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
212B
- Small grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 20B (Hiwassee)
Appl. Date
20B -
Oats for grain - 104 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
20B -
Wheat for grain - 132 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
203 -
Corn for grain - 119 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20B -
Corn for silage - 228 The N/ac
'Beb-June
20B -
Sorghum for grain -.150 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20B -
Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20B -
Sorghum - Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20B -
Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20B -
Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
20B -
Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
20B -
Small Grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 20B2 (Hiwassee)
Appl. Date
20B2
- Oats for grain - 85 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
20B2
- Wheat for grain - 96 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
20B2
- Corn for grain - 94 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20B2
- Corn for silage - 180 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20B2
- Sorghum for grain - 113 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20B2
- Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20B2
- Sorghum - Sudangrass for hay-150 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20B2
- Sudangrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20B2
- Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
20B2
- Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
20B2
- Small grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 20C (Hiwassee)
Appl. Date
20C -
Oats for grain - 91 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
20C -
Wheat for grain - 108 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
20C -
Corn for grain - 106 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20C -
Corn for silage - 204 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20C -
Sorghum for grain - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
20C -
Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
20C -
Sorghum - Sudangrass for hay - 193 The N/ac
Feb -July
20C
- Sudangrass for hay - 154 The N/ac
Feb -July
20C -
Fescue for hay - 140 The N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
20C -
Orchardgrass - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
20C -
Small grain for hay - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL
TYPE 23B2 (no legend available)
Appl. Date
23B2
- Oats for grain - 85 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
23B2
- Wheat for grain - 96 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
23B2
- Corn for grain - 94 lbs N/ac
Feb -June

23B2
- Corn for silage - 180 The N/ac
Feb -June
23B2
- Sorghum for grain - 113 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
23B2
- Soybeans - 140.lbs N/ac
Feb -July
23B2
- Sorghum - Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July..
23B2
- Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
23B2
- Fescue for hay - 125--lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
23B2
- Orchardgrass for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
23B2
- Small grain for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Feb-June,Aug-Dec
SOIL'TYPE 232E (Tatum)
Appl. Date
232B
- Oats for grain - 91 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232E
- Wheat for.grain - 120'lbs N/ac
Aug�Dec,Feb-June
232B
- Corn for grain - 113 The N/ac
Feb -June
232B
- Corn for silage - 216 The N/ac
Feb -June
232B
- Sorghum for grain - 200 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232B
- Sorghum - Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
232B
- Soybeans - 120 lbs.N/ac
Feb -July
232B
- Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232B
- Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232B
- Orchardgrass for hay - 150 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232B
- Small grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL
TYPE 232C (Tatum)
Appl. Date
232C
- Oats for grain - 85 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232C
- Wheat for grain - 108 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232C
- Corn for grain - 106 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232C
- Corn for silage - 204 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232C
- Sorghum for grain - 188 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232C
- Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232C
- Sorghum - Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
232C
- Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232C
- Fescue for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232C
- Orchardgrass for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232C
- Small grain for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL
TYPE 232B2 (Tatum)
Appl. Date
232B2
- Oats for grain - 78 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232B2
- Wheat for grain - 72 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232B2
- Corn for grain - 81 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232B2
- Corn for silage - 156 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232B2
- Sorghum for grain - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
232B2
- Soybeans - 100 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232B2
- Sorghum -Sudangrass for hay - 110 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
232B2
- Sudangrass for hay - 110 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232B2
- Fescue for hay - 100 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232B2
-.Orchardgrass for hay - 100 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232B2
- Small grain for hay - 100 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 232C2 (Tatum)
232C2
- Oats for
grain -
72 lbs,N/ac
232C2
- Wheat for
grain -
60 lbs N/ac
232C2
- Corn for
grain -
63 lbs N/ac
232C2
- Corn for
silage -
120 lbs N/ac
232C2
- Sorghum
for grain
- 100 1bs N/ac
Appl. Date
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
Feb -June
Feb -June
Feb -June

232C2
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 83 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
232C2
- Soybeans - 100 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232C2
- Sudangrass for hay - 83 The N/ac
Feb -July
232C2
- Fescue for hay - 75 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232C2
- Orchardgrass for hay - 75 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
232C2
- Small grain for hay..- 75 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 131B (Nason)
Appl. Date
131B -
Oats for grain - 91 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131B -
Wheat for grain - 108 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131B -.Corn
for grain - 113 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
131B -
Corn for silage - 216. lbs N/ac
Feb -June
131B -
Sorghum for grain - 200 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
131B -
Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
131B -
Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
131B -
Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
131B -
Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131B -
Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131B -
Small grain for hay - 150.lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 131C (Nason)
Appl. Date
131C -
Oats for grain - 85 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131C -
Wheat for grain - 108 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131C -
Corn for grain - 106 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
131C -
Corn for silage - 204 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
131C -
Sorghum for grain - 188 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
131C -
Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
131C -
Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
131C -
Sudangrass for hay - 138 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
131C -
Fescue for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131C -
Orchardgrass for hay- 125 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
131C -
Small grain for hay - 125 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 522A (Cid)
Appl. Date
522A -
Oats for grain - 80 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522A -
Wheat for grain - 96 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522A -
Corn for grain - 113 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522A -
Corn for silage - 192 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522A -
Sorghum for grain - 200 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522A -
Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 193 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
522A -
Soybeans - 140 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522A -
Sudangrass for hay - 193 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522A -
Fescue for hay - 175 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522A -
Orchardgrass for hay - 175 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522A -
Small grain for hay - 175 lbs N/ac.
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 522E (Cid)
Appl. Date
522B -
Oats for grain - 68 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522B -
Wheat for grain - 84 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522B -
Corn for grain - 100 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522E -
Corn for silage - 168 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522B -
Sorghum for grain - 175 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522B -
Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 176 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
522B -
Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July

-522B -
Sudangrass for hay - 176 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522B -
Fescue for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522B -
Orchardgrass for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522B -
Small grain for hay - 160 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 525B (Cid)
Appl. Date
525B -
Oats for grain - 68'lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
525B -
Wheat for grain - 84 The N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
525B -
Corn for grain - 100 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
525B -
Corn for silage - 168 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
525B -.Sorghum
for grain - 175 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
525B -
Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 176 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
525B -
Soybeans - 120 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
525E -
Sudangrass for hay - 176 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
525B -
Fescue for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
525E -
Orchardgrass for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
525E -
Small grain for hay - 160 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 522C (Cid)
Appl. Date
522C -
Oats for grain - 56 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522C -
Wheat for grain - 72 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522C -
Corn for grain - 94 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522C -
Corn for silage - 144 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522C -
Sorghum for grain - 163 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
522C.-
Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522C -
Soybeans - 100 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522C -
Sudangrass for hay - 165 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522C -
Fescue for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522C -
Orchardgrass for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
522C -
Small grain for hay - 150 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
SOIL TYPE 68B-C (Goldston)
Appl. Date
68B-C
- Oats for grain - 68 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
68B-C
- Wheat for grain - 84 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
68B-C
- Corn for grain - 88 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
68B-C
- Corn for silage - 168 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
68B-C
- Sorghum for grain - 135 lbs N/ac
Feb -June
68B-C
- Sorghum-Sudangrass for hay - 154 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
68B-C
- Soybeans - 80 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
68B-C
- Sudangrass for hay - 154 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
68B-C
- Fescue for hay - 140 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
68B-C
- Orchardgrass for hay - 140 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
68B-C
- Small grain for hay - 140 lbs N/ac
Aug-Dec,Feb-June
NOTE: THESE ARE THE RECOMMENDED NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FOR EACH SOIL
TYPE, WHEN A CROP IS PLANTED THAT VARIES FROM THE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN,
THE NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FROM ABOVE MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO.COMPLY
WITH .0200 REGULATIONS. IF HAYLAND IS USED FOR GRAZING, THE APPLICATION
RATE MUST BE REDUCED BY 25 PERCENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL
OUR OFFICE, THE PHONE NUMBER IS [phone].

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil
loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" required by DEM.
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent

Z i I IT11 17 ATrle
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted,
low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on
soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be- held to- a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up
released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting
of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may. be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate
vegetative filter strips are present.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways
that discharge directly into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates
provided the application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a
maximum operating Ievel to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm
event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the
vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence. of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Farm: l Q.wn 6.&o n hmy/
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of th
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility owner: f wAd Cau4a'YT1 Ln
(PIeaee print) Signature: ,49Q Date: 2-
Name of Technical Specialist:: (Plaaae prant)S©-6- Tr.d
Affi1iation: 01-14"(in J1�Ou `AMk0. Address (Agency) 0. Os't �oR
Date:

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NWTV
ERS
DWQ 4f9' -y-7aa
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD iqI % 54�- ga!,
NRCS l5 t2) .tea- BW4
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump._
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
December 18, 1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. if spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
2 December 18, 1996

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: M '
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
f
s-J f
r,
3 December 18, 1996

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
• pairy production
ig
Vegetative or wooded buffers
O
Recommended best management practices
WGood
judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn alley
o Wet manure -covered surfaces
rape or flush daily
surfaces
:,_—Scrape
mote m with proper ventilation
drying P Po
lt?
Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
• Urine
gr
Promote dryingwith proper ventilation
• Partial microbial decomposition
Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
Manure dry stacks
• Partial microbial decomposition
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure R
Storage tank or basin
• Partial microbial decomposition ;
I]
Bottom or mid -level loading
surface
. Mixing while filling ;
O
Tank covers
• Agitation when emptying
p3
Basin surface mats of solids;
M tmmize to runoff and liquid additions
Or
Agitate only prior to manure removal
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surfaces
• Partial microbial decomposition
0
Liquid drainage from settled solids
• Mixing while filling
O
Remove solids regularly
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading
3
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets
• Volatile gas emissions
B
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
I]
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
O
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
O/Soil incorporation within 48 his
surfaces
M
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
f]
Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
O
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with VA
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
orjunction boxes conveyance
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 1

Source Cause IIMI's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lill slalions • Agitation during sump lank CI Sump tank covers .IA
tilling and drawdown f�
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ld Extend discharge poittl of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid Ievet
L.agoun surfaces • Volatile gas cutissionts; fewr 'roper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures;
AgtaUom ❑/Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
0 Minimum agitation while pumping;
CJ Mechanical aeralion;
Cl Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • I ligh pressure agitalion; ❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles a Wind drift Cl Minimum recommended operating procedure; q F}
�1
❑ Puntp intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Dead birds • Carcass decomposition Cl Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead bird disposal pits • Carcass decompositium Q Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
CI Proper location/construction of disposal pits; IVA-
Q 21'sposal pit covers light tilling
Standing water aruund • Improper drainage; W Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities 0 Microbial decomposition of away front facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Fanti access road ntninlenatice
roads from farm access
Addilional Information: Available From :
Poultry Manure Management ; 0200 Rule/131VI1' Packet NCSU, County Cxlension Center
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: 1 tigh Rise, Deep Pit ; Ci3AC 01-88 NCSU - BAC
Poultry Layer Production Facilily Manure Management: Undercage blush - Lagoon 'i'reatntent ; CBAC 130-88 NCSU - BAC
Lagooal Design and Management fur Livestock Manure Trealment and Storage; CBAC 103-83 NCSU - BAC
Calibration of Manure and WasteAvaler Applicalion [equipment ; EBAL' Fact Sheet NCSU - BAC
Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry , PSR'I' Guide No. 19 NCSU - Poultry Science
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
ANIOC - November 11, 1996, Page 7

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
. Source Cause BMI's to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush Clutters Accumulation of solids
❑ flush system is designed mid operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids front K4
gullcrs as designed. �.
❑ Remove bridging of accuutulatcd solids at
dischurgc
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids
Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to iuinim've the
crusting of solids to n depth of no more tban 6-
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegelalive Decaying vegetation
Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on inupoundnicnt's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders Fecd Spillage ❑ Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the t `/L
accumulation of decaying wastage. ICI fr
❑ Clean op spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 11
day interval during sunnier; 15-30 day interval
Storage Accumulations of Iced residues ❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in lillcr strips around feed storage as
needed.
AMIC - November It, 1996, Page I

Source Cause DMI's to Coutrol Insects Sllc Specific Practices
Animal I lolding Areas 49 Accumulations of annual wastes ❑ Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and Iced wastage fences and other locations where waste
accunmlales and disturbance by aniinals is
/�unutrtl.
Maiataiu fence rows and filler strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure I landling Accwnulalions of.utitual wastes ❑ Remove spillage on it routine basis (e.g., 7 - IU
Systems day interval during smnnter; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas ns needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative I-Wension Service, Department of Lnlonology, Box 7613, North Carolina Slate University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

�J
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
E Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300.feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. CR 1ves
GU/ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7 O-OW 5
❑ Complete incineration
_J In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Q Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without:endangering .. _
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 13, 1996

COUNCILMAN FARMS
HAROLD COUNCILMAN
1806 Ronald Scott Road
Bear Creek, NC 27207
140 COW HOLSTEIN DAIRY
10,850LBS PAN PRODUCED YEARLY (NRCS)
4300 GALLON HOULE LIQUID MANURE SPREADER
CALIBRATION:
Brand new spreader - Attached is a sheet from the manufacturer that
indicates the spreading rate based on speed, PTO rpm's, and spreading width.
These values will be used in this waste management plan. The owner stated that
the tractor was driven at 4 mph at standard PTO speed. It took the owner 2.5 to 3
minutes to unload. With these facts, the spreading rate is 5,500 gallons/acre. This
is 1.3 loads per acre.
WASTE ANALYSIS:
Broadcast -1.3 lbs PAN/I000 gallons
Soil Incorporated -1.8 lbs PAN/1000 gallons
CROPS:
Fescue hay/pasture-148.04 acres
Corn Silage -141.4 acres
Small Grain Silage - —60 acres (double cropped with corn for silage)

• ..' a ..L., a::n: _.
Cn:. i1G,
_._._ L. _..._..
HOULE SPREADER MODEL
EL-54-3600 (4300 US/GAL)
SERIAL 4 97-1465
54O RPM 31/2' NOZZLE SET AT 36` ABOVE GROUNG
SPEED
SPREADING
UNLOADING RATE
SPREADING RATE
PTO RPM
IN MPH
WIDTH IN FEET
IN US/GALJMIN
IN US/GAL/ACRE
540
6
27
1200
3667
5
27
1200
4400
4
Y 27
1200
6500_ v
3
27
1200
7333
2
27
1200
11000
6
26
1000
3173
500
5
26
1000
3808
4
26
1000
4760'
3
26
1000
6346
2
26
1000
9519
460
6
25
800
2640
5
25
800
3168
v 4
25
800
3960
3
25
800
5280
2
25
800
7920
THE SPREADING RATES SHOWN ABOVE ARE APPROXIMATE AND WITH WATER. ACTUAL UNLOADING RATE WITH
MANURE COULD DECREASE BY AS MUCH AS 15% DEPENDING OF MANURE SOLIDS CONTAIN AND DENSITY. HOWEVER
SPREADING WIDTH WILL NOT CHANGE 161UCH THEREFORE DECREASING SPREADING WE.
MID001.WK4 11/13M7

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Farm has a total of 289 acres devoted to crops for the dairy. The crops raised are
fescue (148.04 acres) and com silage (141.4 acres) rotated with small grain.
The dairy will generate 10,850 lbs PAN/year. (MRCS figures) This is assuming
that all the manure from the dairy goes into the lagoon. On this, particular dairy, the
cows are on pasture except during milking and feeding (2X per day). The total
PAN generated from the manure holding system will be less than the above figure.
Fescue Nutrient Management
• Fields are to be fertilized in February and March. After each cutting for
hay, the field will be fertilized again. If the field is grazed then additional
fertilizer should be added in the fall to stimulate growth. The preferred
month for application for stockpiled fescue is late August and September.
• Attached is a chart which indicates the amount of Nitrogen that can be
applied to the fields. It ranges from a low of 100 lbs PAN/acre to a high
of 160 Ibs PAN/acre based on soil type.
• The waste analysis indicates that there is 1.3 lbs PAN/1000 gallons
broadcast. Based on the calibration of the spreader this is 7.2 lbs
PAN/acre.
• All fescue fields on the farm whether used for hay production or grazing
will need more N/acre to be productive. Additional N can be supplied by
applying more loads of manure per acre or using commercial fertilizer to
provide the additional nutrients needed.
Corn Silage/Small Grain Silage Nutrient Management
• Corn for silage will be planted in March or April. The crop will be
harvested in late July, August, or early September.
• Small grain for silage will be planted annually on about 60 acres. The
small grain will be planted in September, October, or early November.
The small grain will be harvested for silage in late April or May. Corn
will be planted in these fields in May or early June.

Manure will be applied to the small grain fields no more than 30 days
before planting. The manure will be soil incorporated. The amount of
PAN available from the manure is 1.8 lbs/1000 gallons soil incorporated.
Based on the calibration standards set by the company, 9.9 lbs PAN/acre
is available.

COUNCILMAN FARM
1806 Ronald Scott Road
Bear Creek, NC 27207
Tract #
Field #
Acres
Soil Type
Crop
1
Lbs
Nitrogen/
Acre
Lbs Nitrogen
Applied -w
1
Maximum
Nitrogen/
Field
865
1
1.6
68C
Fescue
140
224
865
2
1.8
68C
Fescue
140
252
865
3
2.1
68C
Fescue
140
294
865
4
8.2
52262
Fescue
150
1230
865
5
1.8
68C
Fescue
140
252
865
6
2.1
52262
Fescue
150
315
865
7
10.2
522C2
Fescue
100
1020
865
8
11.9
522132
Fescue
150
1785
865
9
10.2
522132/C2
Fescue
150
1530
850
1
21.1
No Info
Com and Small Grain Silage
168172
5064
850
2
17.6
No Info
Com and Small Grain Silage
168/72
4224
547
1
18.6
522B2
Com and Small Grain Silage_
192/65
4780
547
2
4.5
52262
Com and Small Grain Silage
192/65
1157
547
3
6.2
68B
Com and Small Grain Silage
168/72
1488
547
4
9.5
522B
Com and Small Grain Silage__
192/65
2442
547
5
6.6
522B
Com and Small Grain Silage
192165
1696
547
6
11
522B
Com and Small Grain Silage
192/65
2827
547
7
8.5
68B
Com and Small Grain Silage
168172
2040
547
8
9.2
68C
Com and Small Grain Silage
168
2208
547
9
15.3
No Info
Fescue
72
2295
547
10
4.7
No Info
Fescue
150
705
547
11
4.4
No Info
Fescue
150
660
547
12
1.3
No Info
Fescue
150
195
547
13
9.8
522B
Fescue
150
1470
5471
14
1 5.3152213
1 Com and Small Grain Silage
192/65
1
1 1363

4155
1
5.6
No Info
Fescue
150
840
4155
2
2.9
No Info
Fescue
435
827
1
6.1
625B
Fescue
160
976
827
2
4.4
525B
Fescue
160
704
827
3
11.3
131E
Fescue
150
1695
827
4
7.6
No Info
Fescue
150
1140
827
5
1 24.741
No Info
JFescue
1501
3711
4133
1.2,3,41
23.3
131C
Corn and Small Grain Silage
204/85
1
6734
Total
289.44
57751
'•• comments on IN of nitrogen applied per field or crop are included in the notes section of this report.
Notes:
• Based on the number of acres and crops grown on this dairy there will not be a nitrogen pollution problem on this dairy.
• The initial analysis from the first application of waste from this new holding/storage pond indicates that the levels of nitrogen are extremely
low (1.3 lbs PAN/1000 gallons broadcast, 1.8 lbs PAN/1000 gallons soil incorporated.
• The owner/operator in charge plans to apply waste from his waste handling system in the fall on fescue (broadcast) and small grain for silage
(soil incorporated). If necessary due to nitrogen levels and waste levels in the holding pond, he will make arrangements to apply the waste at
other times that are agronomically correct to prevent the potential of pollution.
• The operator in charge (OIC) will soil test yearly and do waste analysis within 60 days of application of the waste as specified in SB 1217.
The OIC will monitor his soil test reports for build-up of other nutrients using the soil index information. If build-ups occur then he will make
changes in his application of the waste.
• The OIC is aware that nitrogen applied to fescue fields being grazed must be reduced by 25%.
• The assumption is made that 60 acres of small grain each year will receive 50 lbs PAN from manure. The fields can handle a total of 65 - 72
lbs PAN/acre. This account for 3000 lbs PAN. The remaining 78501bs PAN will be used on the fescue fields. If the assumption is made that
the average amount of PAN/fescue field is 140 lbs, and we account for grazing by reducing the PAN by 25%, then the fields can receive 105
lbs PAN per year. Assuming that 60 lbs are applied in the fall to the fescue fields, then a total of 131 acres of fescue will be needed. This is
available on this farm. The application of manure at the above amounts does not provide all the nitrogen for the crops to be productive. This
is also assuming that the total PAN (10,850 lbs) from urine and manure is being collected in the holding pond. Since the herd is pastured for
most of the day, the yearly PAN will be less than the 10,850 lbs projected.
• The OIC will keep records on application of nutrients to each of his fields as directed by SB 1217.
• All deficiencies in nitrogen and other nutrients will be supplied by commercial fertilizer.
• Any changes to this plan will be discussed and made with the assistance of a Certified Technical Specialist (CES or NRCS representative).

Realistic Yield Expectations by Soil and Crop
SOIL. SERIES
Com-
Omits
Corn
Vag
i
Sor-
&hum
Cotton
Wheat
Oats
Barley
Tob.
FC
Tob.
Bur.
Soy-
bean
Berm
P
Berm
Hay
Fes
Pas
Fes
Hay
Pasture
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ann
BO1AC SL; FSL; L
120
`
800
45
•
•
1900
1900
40
4.7
5.5
•
'
BOIAC LFS; LS
90
•
'
750
40
'
1800
1900
30
«
.
r
•
s
BOLLING FLOOD. NONE;
RARE
120
•
`
`
60
80
•
•
40
5.4
6.3
3.4
4.5
'
BOLLING OCCAS. FLOOD.
100
•
•
•
50
65
•
•
•
35
•
+
BONNEAU
85
'
•
700
•
2600
2600
30
4.7
5.5
•
•
•
'
BRADDOCK
130
28
'
50
°
-
•
•
'
6.7
6.7
BRADSON
I10
`
•
•
45
•
•
•
3000
•
•
4.5
4.5
BRADSON GRAVELLY
85
•
'
•
35
°
•
+
2600
•
•
•
•
3.3
3.5
•
`
°
BRAGG
•
.
•
.
.
.
.
•
•
«
2A
4
1.2
2
BRASSTOWN
85
'
60
•
4
BREVARD
105
•
'
'
65
75
'
26W
•
•
•
3.5E3E.5
•
'
BROOKMAN UNDRAINED
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3.4
4
3
3.5
BROOKMAN DRAINED
130
•
•
•
55
60
•
.
.
45
BULADEAN
70
•
.
.
.
•
.
•
•
•
3.1
3.1
1-
•
BUNCOMBE RARE
60
'
45
'
20
55
•
1700
1700
•
`
2.0
2.0
'
BUNCOMBE OCCAS
'
•
•
•
«
•
•
•
•
•
•
1.5
1.5
BUNCOMBE FREQ
•
•
•
`
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1.5
1.5
BUTTERS
100
•
•
•
SO
•
2400
2400
35
4.7
1 5.5
•
•
'
BYARS DRAINED
110
•
'
+
°
65
•
'
•
40
3.4
4
3
3.5
'
CAINHOY
55
•
.
.
.
20
•
•
•
20
3.2
3.9
•
•
'
CANDOR _
45
•
'
'
1700
1700
20
4.2
5
e
•
•
a
r
CAPE FEAR DRAINED
140
•
•
•
•
•
•
45
CAPE FEAR UNDRAINED
•
.
.
.
•
3.4
4
3
3.3
CAROLINE FSL; SL; L; SB.;
YFSL = -
113
60
40
5.1
6
3.2
3.6
a
CAROLINE CL; SCL
80
40
•
•
30
•
•
+
CECIL
95
'
•
750
•
90
2100
2100
35
3.4
4
3.8
4.5
4.8
CECIL GRAVELLY
70
•
•
500
•
70
'
1600
1600
25
3.4
4
3.8
4.3
3.3
CENTENARY
65
*
2000
2000
20
4.7
5.5
•
•
CHAPANOKE DRAINED
130
`
'
55
•
`
`
45
4.7
5.5
A
4.5
CHARLESTON
90
'
•
•
'
•
40
4.7
5.5
3.7
4.3
•
'
CHASTAIN OCCAS
50
•
•
`
•
•
'
•
•
25
•
2.5
3
CHESTATU
3
•
+
•
- •
•
a
s
.
.
•
•
•
3
CHESTER
135
27
•
50
'
s
•
45
•
+
•
2.8
2.8
5.5
CHESTNUT
75
40
•
•
•
2.9
2.8
CHEWACLA RARE; OCCAS
100
`
`
'
S0
70
35
4.2
5
3.8
4.5
1 6.6
CHEWACLAFREQ
80
•
•
•
30
40
•
•
•
30
•
•
4.5
CHICKAHOMINY DRAINED
80
•
.
40
•
r
•
25
•
•
3.5
4
CHICKABOMINY
LiNDRAINED
•
•
•
s
.
•
•
.
.
•
•
.
•
2.7
3.1
CHIPL EY
50
•
•
2000
2000
20
4.7
5.5
CID '
90
16
•
•
40
45
•
33
•
•
•
4.8
CL.EVELAND
70
•
•
e
•
•
.
•
.
CLEFION
100
•
•
•
•
2400
•
•
3.5
3.5
CODORUS
130
26
'
•
45
80
•
•
•
•
4.2
4.2
•
4.5
COLFAX
75
l5
•
•
40
60
•
•1
•
1 30
•
'
•
•
4.9
•
`
•
NCSU/NCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
66

Realistic Yield Expectations by Soil and Crop
SOIL SERIES
Com-
Grain
Corn
Silag
e
Sor-
ghum
Cotton
Wheat
Oats
Barley
Tab,
FC
Toh.
Bur.
Soy-
bean
Berm
P
Berm
Ilay
Fes
Pas
Fes
Hay
Pasture
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ann
EDNEYTOWN GRAVELLY
85
•
45
,
35
•
3.3
3.3
'
EDNEYVILI£
85
•
55
'
•
24DO
•
•
'
3.3
3.3
•
•
"
UKTON DRAINED
120
•
50
•
'
40
3.4
4
2.5
3
,
ELLLIAY
a
•
•
•
,
•
4
4
5
ELSIN90R0
130
26
"
'
50
•
'
'
•
°
•
•
. •
4.8
4.8
•
•
5
EMPORIA
I10
•
650
55
•
3000
3000
35
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
ENGELHARD DRAINED
135
°
•
•
•
+
45
3.4
4
3.9
4.5
•
'
'
'
ENON
95
'
•
550
45
•
•
2100
2100
35
2A
2.9
2.5
3
5.1
ENON GRAVELLY
80
*
'
450
35
I8U0
1800
25
2.4
2.9
2.5
3
5.1
ENON STONY
'
•
•
'
'
•
•
'
'
2.4
2,8
2.5
3
3.3
EUSTIS
60
•
•
•
30
•
•
•
•
25
4.2
5
EXUM
125
•
•
750
•
•
3000
3000
SD
5.5
6.5
3.7
4.3
•
'
•
'
EXWAY
90
a
.
•
•
&0
.
•
a
35
<
,
.
•
4.8
FACEVaLE
115
'
875
•
•
•
45
'
6
•
4.2
FALLSINGTON DRAINED
110
•
•
•
45
50
•
35
3.8
4.5
3
3.5
FALLSINGTON UNDRAINED
70
•
•
35
'
40
30
`
FANNIN
75
•
•
•
•
60
•
•
•
,
3
3
`
FLETCHER
85
•
•
'
'
•
•
"
'
•
•
•
'
3.5
1 3.5
'
"
3.5
FORESTON
120
700
2600
2600
35
5.1
6
3.5
4
FORK
120
'
•
•
50
55
•
'
•
40
•
'
'
•
'
'
FORTESCUE DRAINED
130
'
'
'
55
•
•
'
'
50
3.4
4
3
3.3
•
•
'
'
FUQUAY
85
•
•
•
'
60
•
2400
2400
30
4.7
5.5
•
•
5.1
•
•
'
FUQUAY GRAVELLY
80
r
•
650
60
2400
2400
1 30
4.7
1 5.5
'
5.1
'
GALESTOWN US
70
14
•
"
30
30
3.9
4.5
•
'
GALESTOWN LS
60
12
•
•
25
•
a
•
•
30
•
♦
a
GALESTOWN SL
80
16
•
•
4$
.
.
•
•
40
.
•
,
,
a
•
a
a
GALESTOWN GRAVELLY
60
12
'
25
3.8
4.5
GALESTOWN STONY
•
•
•
•
a
•
3.8
4.5
•
'
'
GASTON
113
30
•
•
'
80
75
<
.
40
•
5.5
GEORGEVILLE
95
'
60
700
a
80
2200
2200
'
3.4
4
3
3,6
3
GEORGEVILLE ROCKY
85
•
50
600
•
70
•
•
•
•
3.4
4
3
3.6
3
"
•
'
GILEAD
85
•
•
.550
`
2200
2200
35
5.1
6
3.2
3.9
4.2
GOLDSBORO
125
'
'
700
60
3000
3000
42
5,5
6,5
3,7
43
GOLDSTON
70
•
54
•
35
•
45
•
•
20
3
3.3
2.3
3
2.8
0RANT1iAM DRAINED
130
•
•
55
•
45
4.2
5
3.8
4.5
•
'
'
GRANVILLE
90
•
55
750
'
80
'
2300
2300
'
4.2
5
3
3.5
4.5
GRANVILIE GRAVELLY
80
•
45
600
70
2100
2100
•
•
•
3.9
GREENLEE
85
•
•
+
•
a
e
.
.
•
.
<
.
.
•
<
GRIFFON UNDRAINED;
NONE; RARE
•
'
'
'
3.9
4.5
3.9
4.5
•
"
•
'
GRIFTON DRAINED; NONE;
RARE;OCCAS
110
'
°
'
•
40
'
•
•
•
•
°
GR TNEY
95
'
•
650
45
'
28o0
2800
30
4.7
5.5
3.2
3.8
GROVER
90
`
55
700
•
80
'
2100
2100
•
•
4.5
GWINNETT
85
•
65
700
•
75
•
•
a
5,1
3,6
3.7
r
HALLISON
85
•
•1
40
•
2400
2400
35
•
'
•
'
0
FLANCEVILL.E
95
'
400
75
•
•
•
5.7
•
•
5.7
'
NCSUINCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
68

Realistic
Yield
Expectations by Soil and Crop
SOIL SERIFS
Corn-
Grain
Cam
Vag
e
Sor-
ghum
Colton
Wheal
Oats
Barley
Tab.
FC
Tob.
Bur.
Soy-
bean
Berm
P
Ben"
Hay
Fes
Pas
Fes
Hay
Pasture
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ann
LEAKSV.. I F
65
•
•
•
40
'
30
•
`
3.5
•
'
ILMOR NONE; RARE
100
*
•
525
45
•
2200
2200
40
4.5
5.3
3.8
4-5
��
s
i
• •
�t
%
_
r
f
f
LmEEL UNDRAINM
•
a
s
•
.
•
•
•
•
•
3.4
4
31
4.5
LWOEL DRAINED
120
°
•
550
•
•
•
•
•
45
•
•
LIGNUM
90
111
•
•
40
40
•
a
•
35
2.5
3
2.5
3
2
•
`
'
LILLINGTON
80
•
'
650
70
•
2100
2100
30
3.7
4.3
2.5
3
5
'
•
'
LOCKHART
40
400
50
•
a
,
r
2.7
LONON
95
19
•
r
.
r
a
•
3.9
3.8
.
r
LONON GRAVELLY
90
18
•
•
•
'
'
'
3.5
3.5
LOUISA
40
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
20
•
•
•
3
•
•
•
'
LOUISBURG
55
'
'
70
30
3
3.5
2.5
3
LOUISBURG GRAVELLY
20
'
'
50
•
"
20
3
3.5
2.3
3
•
"
LOUISBURG STONY
•
•
'
•
2.5
3
3
3.5
1.8
•
`
LOUISDUPG VERY STONY
•
•
.
.
•
«
LUCY
80
r
•
650
•
•
•
•
33
4.7
5.5
'
'
5.5
LUMBEE DRAINED
110
•
•
•
70
•
45
3.8
4.5
3.8
4.5
.
LYNCHBURG
115
•
•
675
•
75
"
2800
2800
45
4,7
5.5
3.8
4.5
•
LYNN HAVEN
70
'
•
•
•
.
'
•
•
3A
4
2.4
2.8
•
•
'
MADISON
90
55
700
+
85
2.100
2100
'
3
3.5
2.5
3
4.5
MARLBORO
100
'
[ON
•
•
2500
2500
40
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
MARLBORO WET
SUBSTRATUM
[DO
•
•
Woo
♦
•
•
2500
2500
40
S,l
6
3.2
3.8
•
r
MARVYN
75
`
`
800
50
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
•
•
•
'
MASADA
120
24
•
•
5o
75
'
•
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
3.3
4.5
MASADA GRAVELLY
115
2.2
•
•
45
70
'
'
'
•
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
3.9
4
MASADA ERODED;
GRAVELLY; GR•SCL
90
20
•
40
60
•
•
•
2.7
•
2.7
2.7
•
•
3.9
MASADA STONY
•
•
s
•
.
.
3.4
4
3.8
4.5
4.5
MASCOTTE
50
•
•
s
.
a
.
•
20
3A
4
3A
4
MASONTOWN UNDRAINED;
FREQ
•
'
`
•
•
•
+
•
•
'
2.3
3
MASONTOWN DRAINED;
FREQ
90
•
•
•
.
.
.
.
30
«
MAYODAN
95
s
55
650
•
85
2100
2100
3.8
4.5
3.4
4
4.3
"
•
"
MAYODAN STONY
•
•
s
♦
.
.
.
.
.
•
.
«
.
.
35
MCCOLL DRAINED
90
'
65
'
35
3A
4
2.5
3
.
•
•
'
MECKLENBURG
90
•
55
550
70
'
'
40
3.4
4
3.8
4.5
3.6
•
'
'
MEGGETT NONE: RARE
75
:
`
•
'
'
,
•
40
2.5
3
,
•
•
'
MEGGETT DRAINED
I OO
•
•
•
♦
•
•
•
•
50
MISENHEIMFR
60
.
40
•
30
•
•
:
•
20
•
•
•
3
3 1•
•
r
MOCKSVILLE
85
'
•
50
r
35
•
,
•
51
MONACAN DRAINED
120
`
*
60
8o
•
•
'
q
•
5
MONACAN UNDKAINED
80
•
•
'
50
50
'
3.5
•
•
4
MONACAN OCCAS
8o
•
•
•
50
50
'
'
•
'
3.5
•
•
4
MONACAN FREQ
80
•
50
50
•
,
•
•
3.5
•
'
4
NCSU/NCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
70

Realistic field Expectations by Soil and Crop
SOB. SERIES
Cam-
Grain
Corn
Silag
e
Sot-
ghum
Cotton
Wheat
Oats
Barley
Tab.
FC
I Tob.
Bur.
Say-
bean
I Berm
P
Berm
Ilay
Fes
Pas
Fes
Hay
Pasture
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ann
MONTONIA
s
•
•
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
•
.
3.9
4
1'
'
4.5
MOOSHAUNEE
85
•
•
•
40
•
•
2300
2300
30
'
•
'
3,2
4.3
•
'
MUCKALEE
•
•
•
•'
•
'
•
'
'
•
3.8
4.5
3.4
4
MUNDEN SL; FSL; L
130
•
•
'
50
•
•
'
40
5.1
6
3.4
4
MUNDEN IS; LFS
105
'
•
•
45
•
30
MURVBLE
•
'
:
'
`
•
3.4
4
2.4
2.8
MYATr NONE; RARE;
DRANED
115
23
•
70
35
3.9
4.5
3.8
4.5
MYATT NONE; RARE; OCCAS.
•
a
•
r
•
•
NAHUNTA
[20
•
•
675
«
•
•
2800
2800
45
4.7
5.5
3.8
4.5
NAKINA DRAINED
140
'
40
50
4.2
4.8
3
3.5
•
•
•
«
NANKIN UNDRAINED
80
°
'
•
'
'
•
2300
2300
35
5.4
6.3
3.4
4
NANTAHALA
120
25
'
'
'
•
'
2300
•
•
•
4.0
4.0
•
•
5
NASON
90
18
•
•
45
70
'
30
3
3.5
3.4
4
3
NASON GRAVELLY
90
18
'
•
45
70
•
30
3
15
3.4
4
4.8
NASON GRAVELLY; GR-SICL
70
14
•
'
30
60
•
•
'
25
•
•
4
NEWFLAT
85
•
•
'
45
•
30
4.2
3.8
NlMM014 FSL; Sh DRAINED
1.30
•
•
50
40
3.8
4.5
3.4
4.2
N1MMO LS; LFS; DRAINED
110
•
•
•
45
.
.
•
.
35
•
•
•
•
•
•
.
r
NU{ONTON
140
•
•
'
55
'
50
5.4
6.3
3.4
4
5.6
•
'
«
NOBOCO
115
•
•
700
60
'
'
3000
3000
45
5.4
6.3
3.4
4
•
•
'
NORFOLK
110
•
«
700
•
•
•
30W
3000
•
.
s
.
1 •
s
NORTHCOVE
`
«
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'
•
1-3
1.3
`
•
'
`
OAKBORO OCCAS
100
90
•
45
70
60
35
'
•
•
6
•
•
•
`
OAKBORO FREQ
80
+
80
•
•
30
•
4.8
•
`
'
`
OCILLA
75
'
•
•
•
•
•
2600
2600
35
4,3
5.1
`
•
'
OLUSTEE
75
•
'
'
'
'
•
'
•
30
3.4
4
3.4
4
ONSLOW
115
•
•
•
'
•
2500
2500
40
3.5
6.5 1
3.7
4.3
ORANGE
80
16
•
45
50
•
25
2.5
3
2.4
2.8
3.1
ORANGE GRAVELLY
80
16
45
50
•
25
2.5
3
2.4
2.8
3.1
ORANGE STONY
`
`
•
`
2.4
2.8
2.5
3
3
ORANGEBURG
120
'
'
900
•
•
2400
2400
45
$A
6.3
3.4
4
'
+
ORANGEBURG(OVERWASH
120
•
•
900
"
•
•
2400
2400
45
3.4
63
3.4
4
OSIER DRAINED
70
'
'
•
•
3.4 1
4
3.4
4
•
•
'
"
USTIN
+
,
•
•
•
•
•
,
•
2.0
2.0
OTEEN
70
•
•
`
•
•
•
•
•
'
•
2.3
2.9
'
OUSLEY
50
•
'
•
•
•
20
3.9
4.5
•
•
•
•
`
'
PACOLET
80
•
700
2200
2200
•
3
3.5
2.5
4.2
4.5
•
•
'
PACOLET GRAVELLY; GR-SL;
GR-FSL
80
•
700
2200
2200
•
3
3.5
2.5
3.9
4,5
PACOLET GRAVELLY; GR-
SCL; GR-CL
70
•
•
500
"
•
•
1900
1900
•
•
3.3
3.9
'
PACTOLUS
65
•
•
•
•
1800
1800
25
4.7
5.4
*
•
•
•
•
'
PAMLICO UNDRAME13
•
'
,
•
•
'
2.5
3
PAMLICO DRAINED
115
•
•
'
50
•
•
40
+
PAMLICO LOAMY
SUBSTRATUM
•
•
'
s
.
s
•
s
s
2.5
3
NCSUINCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
71

United States Natural Resources Pittsbcro T.S.O.
Department of Conservation P.O. Box 30e
Agriculture Service Pittsboro, N.C.27312
Subject: ENG - Waste Storage Pond Design
To: Carey F. Evans
Civil Engineering Technician
Raleigh, NC
Data: Aug. 22, 1996
File Code: 210
Included for your review and approval is my final design of the Harold
Councilman Dairy Waste Storage Pond.
Please contact me if you find any errors or see any changes to be
made.
V�
Peter 3. Crawford
Civil Engineer
CC., Angela G. Jessup
Michael W. Sturdivant

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
REQUEST FOR TI
ECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
NC ENG- 24
$191
Landuse:'s Naa=e: (%b ry% Rna District Coa erator.Yes
r
F i.::d Office. Locations Code:
Practice For ich Assistance is Requested:
Code
Fund Allocation: CO-01 ACP ' LTA LTC RC&D OtherACSi�
Type Assistance Requested: (Survey esign Approval, Etc)
Estimated Job Class: Ia U III rV V Other
Highest Approval Level For This Practice By Requesting Office: i & E:
Design: Construction:
Date(s) Assistance is Needed: c.-!J ! cf
Reasons) For Requesting Assistance: ne ek �. 4 +•a, . Q`�E�p
n 1.
Narrative of Site Conditions or Special Circumstances:
Requested B
Approved By:
Area
Priority: H M L (Assigned by Area Conservationist)
z -z'q(�o
4 +r

1•
COUI
MOORE COUNTY
�C:t46'n I f oC Fly -,0a
rnPi�
A LOCH POA Nap Prepared gr
PrLnImg Samcaa.Inc, _
r Amffmwn-DQzon
1011 Fhl Avanoa
Janet IEdlam 4754E-7211

3
• �•,,h LG''�:+�i-'Try: �... �Y},�� .1.
a'� "� _ t 1 '��"s" • rp \ fir. r+-£• L..ti 7 °= _ Yr ,�- �
i✓�`k,t.�; !'`��iJ.'-��� � 'i"`rr����f 'r � "+i,1'+�- � tea,.. 1 �`� �,�=i�a�` 1-�''1'''p•�i�.• _
-�!, 'r i- ,!` ,*. � .-a� � , r :� �• ,fit *, � � � "� �� `L•`�ya
S� �yJ �:� ' _� 1 x y- a , ,, Z �t.�c^,�,-"'" 1 �•i4,•��z�t�l' �: t r���''ti•s,.'E_ ; y
�1.Y'. �e,�_. %r� �1+-�� 1 .�� .i � ♦ ..,�, '2 � _ �i.[_ �� -'Y(}�'# T r ra. i-i..
� _ %j-a�. � ..�t••:1 9' - �•..-`� ♦ rr : t5�1y�`�I��'•�.� •�•^+C 'ail � ~ yC�'�a"'�t �'��7s„
7t s. �•^r: Ar � i�i�: r • �.••�4 ' �tf,,#= ��;,,�'�`F"4�ry ,�,' �S r. t�.
r I
�^+� 'C 1S ,.r-a�,+.�.. L�T,1,4+ ��¢ �i� �11'��L �-� r' h't - � � F• •• _
t`7 �� ��,��� - i`xf .`� � `' �� a-., � 't.. i..,'r A�•� �.s yr' ��4� /
Ay.��F
r•C-: =� • ,�+� 't'A ., .ram,! �4_ `�" T
�., .". c'4-�V�/,�fZ �- y •V�iy �.' .�.;ei"+i��i -A..-� ,1,.r•.
-7r�5'✓Re�i ,�. %i'Z+i y'tt'�= j+1-��°ry+�T'y•�e�Y.�fb
1r
1y��L 4 RAT +.. � ,. r •.I� Ti���!s�/1�}r� - .7�Q�!
..r" -� �4._ �'• �� - � � y� �ytr.����rt,,,•-•}�1 � � ray ,� •4,� "'�
'� � � ..r '� � � _ ,� �: a Crhe��'� `.t,,.�� •*ice'
f vVntr �� �.•}. T � i .' 4
_ y �� -7 _,yam -� _7i � r • ;�,
� � ,i

United States Natural
t } Department of Resources
AgHculture Conservation
Service
WASTE MANAGF-N, IT FACI M SITE EVALUATION
GEINERAL FIFO R4IATION
NAME f+-k-•N1r� LOCATION ckcz�,'C SR Z31S
n
TELEPHONE SIZE OPERATION
LOCATION DATA
-
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER ,�� FT
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACIL I Y (scboot, chusrb da.) — FT.
-
IS SITE W1THN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?
YES NO —
If yes, MRCS cannot provide assistance
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT FROM A "BLUE i IIYE" PERElk STREAM?
YES NO
It no, site must be relocated..._ ... -
IS SITE W1T E N 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPAL=7
YES NO
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval
ARE UPIIr= IN CONSTRUCTION AREA?
YES _ NO
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site
NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-96
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON-CROPL,3ND?
YES ^ NO
If yes, producer must complete Form NRCS-CPA-38 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determination/Delineation).
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAwBUSTING7
YES _ NO'�'-
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, 1T IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONM N TAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE
IF PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAND UNIII. A WETLA.W DELINEATION
IS MADE~.
NRCS will provide technical assistance In wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
inclusions less than one acre in size, NRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values lost are fully
mitigated For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size, MRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimization of impacts, and compensators mitigation is
carried out in that order of preference.
ODOR CONTROL D
HAS ODOR CONTROL. BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER.:
• PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES `1V,�" NO
• PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST 112 Ya � f I! f-NO
OF THE CAPACrIY7
USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN LAND APPLICATION YES �IV (ENO
OF WASTE7

ft
NC-CPA-17
REV. Z. 2-96
Page 2
IS ENDANGERED AND/ORTHREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT?
YES _
NO
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA OR
WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
YES
NO
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA?
YES
NO
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT FARMLANDS IN THE
YES _
NO N
OPERATINGUNIT?
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING?
YES _
NO
If the answer to any of the above Is yes, NRCS will not provide technicsl
assistance unless agency PolicyIs followed.
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY [AND APPLY ALL WASTE YES . NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE, ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
r y,�t Z°1V ' A. C pa*'v
1F NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? °4 41 Erep 1 w�.� YES N 7N, NO
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AGREES[ENT ON LAND YES NO _
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE?
(Attach Waste Utiilzation Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL, LWF.5TIGATION
SHEETATTACIIFD
W S�
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR L4GeON?
IS A LINER REQUIRED?
TYPE OF LII4ERTO BE USED:
IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON
SITE?
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE
ACCESS TO CLAY?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
(Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TIE PRESENT? ,
(If Yea, file must be removed or plugged)
YES X NO
YES NO
CLAY' BENIONTTE , SYNTHETIC _
YES 5C NO
YES 1C NO
YES -)� NO
YES ` NO -y
SITE APPROVED YES NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID FOR TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IFCONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT BEEN STARTED WI/THIN TWELVEMONTHS. A NEW SITE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQLTRED. U
SIGNATURE7b�+, �ti _ d� I DATE
1
F Changes in the local or state law or changes in the standard could require a new site investigaton.

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
Landowner Hero Ir1l Cn"hc ; 1 w,a��� — �' c'ru W S P County C. *-�katn
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of. -Dam Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 3/ 13 / [ (
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Kind of
Est. Elev.
,:Improvementsi
Mt. Elevation
of Breach
Reach: Length: Width:
Slope:
Land Use
Improvements
: Above .:Floodwater Above
:.'
Flood Plain:'
Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft.
x
Ft. :.
Ft.
-pF..
,,.
1 3 O
: ,Tw
2 :�Ooo
:3a�
:Z•s
y�
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach Drk-y.44 ate.;: , ;n f: ,.N-,
ANr%,, -I-, C V,;c.l,'-a s r eo. ti.. o g H oq -P� -K e -: � e .,, r,4-o-4 G,kyg.A
\,,►/ ! 4 i+ S -.L319
Hazard Classification of Dam aC b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification MT II, III, IV, V) pb,4 N-,, G1S.Is-I
By :1
�(name) (title
Concurred By
name) (title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date 3// 3/q 5
Date

r
I
k3n,
0 1 2�1
ICZ
a. LIE
�sv
Ol

t
SCS-FNr:53af
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVFCF
Snll INVF�TI[.ATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
111•
• • • 'fig
CROPLAND -ACRES
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL — ACRES ;it_iupx"
OF '.' • 71f POND SHOWING WHERES •' 1 •
■■■■■■■
■■■■MEMME■MEME
ik�■■
■■MMEM
■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■E■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■
■■
'
■MEMEM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E
■■■■■■■■©■�■■■■■■■■
,■■■■
Eww
r■gar■r�■■�■■■■■■;■�■�■.■�■r■�■■�■�■
BORINGS MADE

"00
di
Ww
Im hvm�
MOOR— —
am
ON
I

Z
t.
. s
---------------------------------------------
DAIRY WASTE -STORAGE POND
notes:
Engineering Design Worksheet for: HAROLD COUNCILMAN DAIRY
In Chatham County, North Carolina Date: 8/13/96
DESIGN BASIS:
,.., 150 Cows ,
D Heifefrs
100 % Confinement Time on Lot (Worse Case)
6 Months Storage (or ISO Days)
24450 sq. ft. of Feedlot Area
0 sq. ft.'of Other Undiverted Drainage Area
120 ft. Wide Pond at Top of Dam
243 ft. Lang Pond at Top of Dam
6.4 in. Rainfall on Pond from 25-year 24--hour Storm
6.4 in. Lot Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm
` 19.0 in. Normal'Runoff (36"/year or 18"/6-mo. for imperv:
7.0 in. Excess Rainfall (from Rainfall Less Evap. Table)
1. Waste Generated:
i5o cows x 1.95 cu.ft/cow/day x 18i] days
x 100 % confinement / 100 =
0 heifers x 1.4 cu.ft./heifer/day x 180 days =
2. Wash Water:
(5 gals./day/cpw) / 17.48 gals./cu.ft.) x 150 caws
x 180 days. _
3. Lot Run-off (Nov.- Apr.):
18.0 " / 12" % 24450 sq. f t .
lots)
cu.ft.
52651
0 cu.ft.
18048 cu.ft.
36675 cu.ft.
4. Excess Rainfall on Waste Storage Fond:
243 ft. length x 120 ft.width= 29160 sq. ft.
29160 sq. ft. x 7 in. /12 in. -- 17010 cu.ft.
5. 25-year 24-hour Storm on Waste Storage Pond:
6.4 ° / 12"- - 29160 sq. f t . - 15552 cu.ft.
25-year 24-hour Storm on Feedlot:
6.4 "/ 12" x 24450 sq. f t . = 13040 cu.ft.
Other Additional Volume
(Outside, Undiverted Drainage Area) = 0 cu.ft.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME
- 152976 cu.ft.
Storage Volume for the 25 year - 24 hour Storm _ 28S92 cu.ft.
Storage Volume at "Begin Pump" Elevation = 124384 cu.ft.
�3�.13g2 4a�
lame = depth/6C (area of tap)+(ar ea of bottom)--(4 x area of midsection)]

notes:
PRISMOIDAL POND DESIGNFriday
-HAPOLD CM I OVA DAIRY NO-(FSTAN OPTION
-T,av
243.09
:'' f 80 �EEaae�a
..._....tc..__...._._.__............. ..I12Q.00
2T 'Jib... 153914.W ._
1�
2 Xo ... .......................... 7
$4.80-
A = (WxZ+8ottc-m W) x (2xDxZ+6bttom L) = 26608.0 sq.Et.
9 = (DxZ+Bnttun W) x (DxZ+Luton L) = 21922.4 sq.ft.
C = Bottom W x Bot rin L = V628.8 sq.-Ft,
D = sty of storage = 7.0 ft.
Volume = (A + AB + 0) x D / 6 (PHISMOIDAL FOP+l1i�'1..1�)
(JC1 UME = 153914.00
c-j. Ft •
TOP WIDTH =
243,09
ft 4
it
SIDE SLOFE = 2.00
fi/ft
TCP LENGTH =
120.00
ft
8.90
i DEPTH TO TOP = fit
ft
80TTi1 WIO7i -
207.39
ft j
F:FPD = .
f
BOTTOM LIDC:TN =
ft
SURFCE APB = 0.61
Wires
i

PRISMOIDAL PANG DESIGN ,",°��
notes: CMMCiLWg4 DAIRY: STORAGE BELOW 25-YH STCHt! DEPTH �
�p �lev." D�,stSs, s'nc�L I
231.30
0.00
:....._........:.....�._.._....._ ,103`3O
STG,.Put i. = 124874.00 � s-� Pip i
�' � �-v�:-�g3•�-��`�=`l`�.0�-`��f•3° Lek
84.78
A = (W;Zf B tan N) x QADxZ+Eottam L) = -,—'G49.8 sq.ft.
B = (DxZ+Bottan N) x (DxZ+Llattcm L) = 21195.1 salt.
C= oottan W x Bnttc�n L _ 17616.9 sq°ft. i
U = dapth of starace = 5.9 t t . i
UoI me = (A + Q + C) x D / r, O'tiI sMOIC-AL FGMI-A)
{ UOLLhE =
124674.30
cu.ft.
TOP WIDTH =
231.30
ft
i�
SIDE SLOPE =
2.00
ft/ft
TOP LEfGTH =
108,:t3
ft 'l
r i
DEPTH TO Tr-1
= 5.85
ft
BOTTOM WIDTH =
2G7.70
f t >
Fr-[3Fi.�1i =
D .Oo
f t
BOTTOM L -"GTH =
84.78
ft
SURFACE =
0,58
across
-
'I

r
rFM-2 ESTIMATING RUNOFF AND PEAK DISCHARGE
VERSION 1.10
.ent COUNCILMAN
sv* t=JC Date: 04-25-96
.n,cv CHATHAM
State: NC Checked: Da.e:
kc . ic-?: DAIRY W5P
--__---------
044 AL via 1 +0 At Acre. +w.:wi•� hi. r,4 jet r,;'•�- � ��?! -
+reinace Area
1
A=res
:ur fe Number
96
+atershed Length
. 230
feat
iaater5hcd S1uOe
,3
Percant
ime of Concentration:
. lot)
Hours
rainfall Typ=
?I.
itor:n Number
-----------'-----------
! I !
!
e 1
'requenc•y (yrs)
------ f
! 10 1'
------1
25 1
!4-Hr Rainfall (in)
€ I
I 5.5 1
I
6.4 -1
a/P Ratio
€ I
i 0.0I 1
!
0.(a1 I
bsad
E I
€ c_,, 10 1
i
0. 1
!L toff
I i
€
nit Peak Discharce
I
11.576 11.L76
�
I
(r_fs/ac a/in)
1 I
€
--------------------
sak Discharge (cfs)
1 __-__-- €
€ 8 f
_--- €
10 f
Compu Led Tc . 10 hour-s default T c used

I r
Inc c
I
_
UFA-414
1I
i r F i t 1f�.r-� 1 I
I I• i`T...L.�
'
1
r
r
1 r i
omie
' r
J� III I i, I I 1 j 11 r III
��s•.`!._I
q8.3
1 't,,�ierftirad i i I
q$ j f ; Wo 5, qa.$
�f ca,i
x
Jf ®J
j.-7
b.a ,
i
193.3
9a.3
I
I'
`9.3
`PV.S
i
i
(•7All
68.3

Je j\ P ► P c L� ccwi CA -a. z P
"Qq+13,otsq�
S`T S �A t S G L ., ..
T C, Nn �gL � 0� .,�iS r I d0.4.p C,,-�,•�!!�S - Ca�rr�'!r 8v���" r� ...... ............__
PNV% L s CiL(,�,
q,
thr�
ro'J 0V� o.k.
`ri
�� �s r, <s G� 1 `
Ir/ f v'1'rc-i �r_►Aa;tt . e �' 4�C�Ct� `65
�r
� �
c.f�5i5 r�
�rii�4� P)'rat { r -F4 A

�C�
nr,¢',-c��'S p1� sees
29 Ac r� , co,Q, k e-lo
r
37 8-
ct
-' _cscuo o►, er+ara�,-res cr-i•+Gv,� soilr . qh �7.'Z Sb�e, .,.:.._....: �_-
VSC � r5 c.. C„'n�•r•,� $cc�'� �,..: Ltr.� � � o� ]S '�� �� i'f! -�11-l`i ��`- - ---
6,Lf Vs� la d
chc�.k r.��=,��, � .+c��•�, : 35 ;� o,� � � �g �� � ti� � tic ��=M r. ►�-io�
TOU
tl•2f s at
'17- 0
&_
g S• :L.

Rev. April 199.1
378-5
Closed conduit spillways designed for pressure flow must have
adequate anti -vortex devices.
An appropriate trash guard shall be securely attached to the
inlet or riser to prevent clogging of the conduit.
A pipe with a suitable valve or gate shall be provided to drain
the pool area if needed for proper pond management or if
required by state law. The principal spillway conduit may be
used as the pond drain if it is located so as to accomplish
this function.
Supply pipes through the dam to watering troughs and other
appurtenances shall have an inside diameter of not less than 1-
1/4 inches. Supply pipes shall be equipped with valves and
antiseep protection. The antiseep protection may be in the
form of a drainage diaphragm or antiseep collars.
Emergency Spillways
The minimum capacity of a natural or constructed emergency'
spillway shall be that required to pass the peak flow.expected
from a design storm of the frequency and duration shown in
.Table 3 less any reduction creditable to conduit discharge and
detention storage.
Table 5 - Minimum Spillway capacity
Principal spillway Emergency Spillway
Design Storm (24-hour) (24-hour)
Job Classl or Detention Storage Design Storm
r(years) years years
I & II s '�
IV �n��' 5 505 50
V ��`� -, 10 505 50
1 Tonal E Manual, Pt. 501 Amendment NC- for job
approval authority class. en job class is raised because of
pipe size, it is not required that the hydrologic design
criteria be raised.
2 When storage, as defined under Scone, is less than 50 acre-
feet.
3 When storage, as defined under Scone, is 50 acre-feet or
more.
1, Where chi n� a�rp� is less t an.?0 acres --"antotaI d4m
height is 1 az t,ktan 2.0.fget, emergency spillway design storm
may be reduced to 10-year frequency.
5 Where drainage area is less than 20 acres, emergency spillway
design storm may be reduced to 25-year frequency. ',.-I

X4. S�-
G�-T -,-'
w7j
c
ESQ C-zks l y 00 >
<
Af zx6
73
Pz,Y4 CL�S
�A k
T7

e
t
L,1v�nz fl EsIGh►
f
llZ c�Y'r�c.+nr.• , c�-�'�,�- C�,r,ccs�. �,..�1 rAo��1 s-�auvr� `'�escu e - ..
1 A,- %^J -,�
11 -
_..�'e��L��e �/_e._�•�►_.�1__._'� Sc�°� GL S: l�s �,.� Gaa� .t-��,�

5C5 AREA-4
'. DESIGN GUIDELINES.':,FOR LAGOON SOIL LINERS
When to consider a liner:
1. If a proposed site is located near a water well, spring, or
other vulnerable water supply.
2. If the excavation boundary of a site is underlain by less than
2 feet of soil over bedrock.
3. If the excavation boundary of a site is underlain by soils
that have less than 2V, gassing a No. 200 sieve and have a
plasticity index less than 5 (always SP, SW, GP, GW sometimes
GM, SM).
4. If the excavation boundary of a site is underlain by
soils that have 20 to 100% passing a No. 200 sieve and have a
plasticity index of 5 to 10 (always CL-ML, usually ML, GM,-SM,
sometimes MH, CL, GC, SC) or highly plastic clays that have a
blocky structure. Where these soils are encountered
documentation is.required to confirm that a liner is not
needed. This documentation shall be laboratory testing, field
permeability testing, or correlation to similar soils in
the same geologic areas for which test data is available.
Soils that contain more than 15% clay make excellent material for
liners. When suitable soil is not available locally usually SP, SW,
GP, GW, GM, SM soils can be treated with bentonite to obtain a
satisfactory soil liner.
Recommended design limits:
1. allowable specific discharge; v < 0.028 feet per day
2. allowable hydraulic gradient; h/d never greater than 8
3. allowable soil liner depth; d never less than 1
L

H A&ZL D C;)vNC1LMAA) JM WS P.
SPECIFICATICNS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS OR HOLDING PONDS
Clearin•l: All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any er.cavacino or filI is started. Stumps will be removed within
the area of the foundation of the emoan'rment and alI excavated areas. All
stumps and roots er.ceedin3 one (1) inch in diameter shall be removed to a
minimum depth of one ") foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of
all debris. The foundation area shall be loosened thorou3hly and rouohiy
leveled, with suitable equipment, before placement of any embankment
material.
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated as shown on the pi,Ins.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. EXACT DIMENSIONS MILL BE DETERMIN5b BY
SCS PERSONNEL WHE14 THE SITE I5 OPENED UP DURING CONSTRUCTION. The cutoff
trench shall be backfilled in thin layers, not to exceed ei3ht (2) inches
depth. Alt standing water shall be removed from the trench before
backfillin3 is started.
Construction: Construction will consist of excavation to the neat lines
and grades as planned. In areas of the lagoon bottom and side slopes where
pervious material is encountered, the area, shall be overexcava ed by 1.
feet and backfilled with clayey material. Excavation shall be by pan,
dra3line and/or backhoe. A bulldozer or other equipment will be used to
dress the slopes. 'Fill material placed in the embankment shall be free of
sod, roots, stones over o inches in diameter, and other objectionable
materials. The fill material shall be placed and spread over the entire
fill area in layers not to exceed o inches in thickness. Construction of
the fill shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content
of the fill material will permit a reasonable degree of compaction.
Compaction of all fill material shall be accomplished with a sheep -foot
roller gassQ3 several times over the entire surface of each.S inch lift.
To protect against Ieaka3e, the entire lagoon bottom and all excavated side
slopes shall be compacted in the same manner as the -fill material
compaction.
The primary borrow area will be within the basin itself. Any other areas
will be 4esi3nated on the plans.
Ve•aetation: All exposed embankment, spillway, and borrow areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of ve3etation as soon as possible after
construction.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Q. n4�r9, barn ahA (�1,40a- r Pns e& sloe sl,312es 1rrr,, -
z
Cut. Core Where Fill Exceeds
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
31 C-a M;r+ ,
W r d k a 4 a s.:7o nle
dL
U.J

AREA TO BE SEEDED:
SIC A R xou VD
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
------------- ----------
Con4acf �-Az NRCS
ACRES p.-1 a t -6 see -di',
io CGn 41 rJw hj /:C'-Vrc
fo of e .
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(HEST SUITED -ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: ANJ6VST 15 TO 4X-TO13ER 3�
LBS_ 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS C 60 LEGS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1) _)j� 2-
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS s 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
LBS. RYE GRAIN e 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR. FESCUE)
LBS. RYE GRASS L 40 LES_/ACRE (TEMPORAF:Y VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEt ZB ER 1 TO MARCH 7 0
lau..
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILI =ER (1000 LESS./ACRE)
TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER. EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SESDB'ED., APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR E❑UIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH.
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
Z.• 4-0 16Sriacre c le %h1//a*- 7� �� adal�d G Seed /►�rX
T-o` a m UrSGr� ;co,► 'Penra toIas Sa h ja araxx ,

It
WASTE STORAGE FOND
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FLAN
f e storage pond is composed of two volumes. The lower 5.47. feet of depth
in the pond is the waste storage volume. The refnai n i ng depth of tde pond
to the emergency spillway level is storage for a 25 year, 24 hour rainfall
that enters the pond. The elevation to start pumping is Y4.I and will be
marked with a permanent marker. In order to maintain 6_ months storage,
the pond will need to be pumped out completely.
The waste utilization plan shall be followed as shown in Attachment A.
This requires samples and-testinS of waste (see Attachment G) before land
application. Waste shall be applied on fields as shown on attached soils
reaps .
A fence will be constructed to prevent livestock from walking on the ijarci,
therefore, preventing a hazard for the livestock and damage to the earn.
The routine maintenance of this waste storage pond involves the fo I I owi n3:
1. Mai-ntenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment and in the emer-
gency spillway: Fescue is being established on these areas. Beg in-
nin3 the year- after, construction and each year thePeafter, the
embankment ansy emergency spillway should be fertilizes with 1,oCio
pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
Z. Control of wee.3s, brush, and trees on the embankment and i r. tree
emergency spillway: this snail be done by mowing, spraying, �r
chQPp i n3, or a combination of all three. This w i 1 i need to t e
'June at least once each year and possibly twice in years fa14r'aGle
to heavy growth of vegetations. You may check with the Ioc;Ll
Extension A3ency or SC5 office for the 'latest infarrnatil:,n e..n spray
material and the best time to apply them.
Maintenance inspections of this waste storage pond snould be m1ad curing
the initial f i l I i n3, at least annually, and after every ma,j.ar storm. m. I terns
to be checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Emergency Spillway
a. erosion
G. sedimentation
C. weeds, small trees, lugs, fences, or other- obstruction that
reduce channeI- capacity or may bIoc.k flow.
?. Embankment '
a. settlement, cracking or ",jug" holes
b. side slope stability --slumps or bul3es
c... erasion
d. r4 cent aama3e
e. se9p13e or otner leakage
f• condition and type of vegetation cover.

C
3 4)/q 6
I- i A►�L D C�� 1�C tL 1Y'+ A 1+� D�1! �� -� CIS � :��
.3
i S 1 ` 3
3�b
-t l 7 72
- 3 2G•
1 7 73
1.3
3
3
`'�-. , ' _ try C ll_-ti ��� _ .i''�0.? Cr Y 0.
i �.it� b �.��.��..'�.;A roc! �.�� C��_�rn-� � C r z�1 .5��'�...•.-�,_
i

C `
C:A1 NCI
EJ23/4 j
* Enter STA,MAP
ACRAGE END AREA'
AREA, and Mao
(
..
conversion factor *
PSG
STATION
MAP AREA
END AREA
SUM OF
DOUBLE
(sq.in.)
(sq.ft.)
AREAS
VOLUME
0.00
0.00
0
Map Conversion
45.Of,�
56.00
15,00
18.00
.00
15.00
15.00
Factor-
675.00 (sq.in.
1.00
to sq.ft.)
81.00
34.00
18.00
34.00
33.00
.52.00
363.00
1300.00
110.00
59.00
58.00
92.00
2668.00
165.00
162.00
162.00
220.00
12100.0t7
187.00
231.00
231.00
393.00
8646.00
260.00
156.00
256.00
487.00
35551.00
340.00
256.00
256.00
512.00
40960.00
430.00
311.00
311.00
567.00
51030.00
442.00
340.00
.340.00
651.00
7912.00
465.00
207.00
207.00
547.00
12581.00
500.00
89.00
S8.00
295.00
10325.00
550.00
0.00
0.00
88.00
4400.00
*FCETOTAL
VOLUME! (SUM
Double
Vol / 2) = 94205.50
r3
(tMb ;WVmE,NT).
z
.
t�
=�7d3
AVERAGE ENID AREA
Enter STA,MAP AREA, and Mao conversion factor
STATION MAP AREA END AREA SUM OF DOUBLE
(sq.in.) (sq.ft.) AREAS VOLUME
0.OQ
0.00
0.00
17.60
1.18
590.00
590.00
10364.00
75.00
1.27
635.00
1225.00
70315.00
135.00
1.36
680.00
1315.00
72900.00
Ia0.00
1.26
630.00
1310.00
52950.00
225.44)
1.419
545.00
1175.00
53345.00
240.00
0.00
0.00
545.00
7957.00
0.0f)
0.00
0.00
0.00
() . C)0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0:00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0o
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Map Conversion
Factor= 500.00
(sq.in. to sq.ft.)
CtL'T TOTAL VOLUME - ( SUM Daub I e Vol / 2) = 139925.50 ;' 3
(V� AL5A) = S 1. 8z 6,
C V T v6`9 T N c.}A CVT I LL l ; ! S,5 ,
► r
V a 1. _ e S.-q .k Lk
�'3
L l P ER� C J T /q7 t LL : ,4 P nm
I .3 C i tki cat
�t7 g G,6�a
17 7-3

C�v Nu LM�1� ,� any wsn W �q
• 1 L
1NAM6-1N Ir L CoNrP.
RNr,Y,. ST%, Ott
I-M PA5 E1Jb A61�A ,'AeLt . t1-}SDK YHy `i 7S)
ST A
rr I LL .I � T
AAA
(f4)
,ALTz-
g.o
3 4l
W{Ss
7,4
y47
5+sue
o
�
C0 rnA�Tx
A7 9.4M p
r=lj D Ai ES 1►1�

4
i
rat
r
f tra�1
r
r
. r .

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina 'Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Archie & Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Rd
Sear Creek NC 27207
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC190035
Councilman Farms
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Chatham County
Dear Archie & Harold Councilman:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 3, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Archie &
Harold. Councilman, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC 190035 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Councilman Farms, located in Chatham County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 140 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Seance Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone; 919-733-3221 1 FAX; 919-715-05881 Internet: h2o,enr,state. nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federaI), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
ZJ� 1
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC190035
APS Central Files

\NA7-' Qq Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
North. Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Alan W, Klimek, P.C. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 3, 2004
Mr. Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Rd
cr"-`-,
Bear Creek, NC 27207
t
--a -
Re: Councilman Farms
23
0
Permit Rescission
Permit No. AWC 190035
Dear Harold Councilman:
Thank you for closing your waste storage pond. Permit number AWC 190035 has been
rescinded because the waste storage pond has been closed. You should no longer receive
invoices for your annual permit fee but if you do, please contact me at [phone], or Paul
Sherman at [phone].
Sincerely,
�01
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fran McPherson
Farm file 419-35
J.D. Hester, Raleigh Regional Office
,OnepIiCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state. nc.us 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

(3tO� W A T,�qQt.
p �
Archie & Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Rd
Bear Creek NC 27207
Dear Archie & Harold Councilman:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC190035
Councilman Farms
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Chatham County
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 3, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Archie &
Harold Councilman, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC190035 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Councilman Farms, located in Chatham County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 140 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.r
M 1*
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.no.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field. 0
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
-; This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
- Sincerely,
y�
r: for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC190035
NDPU Files
0

•
Location: 1 $0(e 1 4JJ .�eo ff
/R�1
Telephone: i q f 0) 581- .34:733
Type Operation: .1 ' N
Number of Animals: IL10 LOS
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which'"
is not'allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
01

r�
u
•
•
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
2

0
U
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
9g�
140 animals X 77Ji (amt.) waste/animal/year =
(amt.) waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
P40 animals X%lbs. PAN/animal/year=��lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for.waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
I
�
k.R:7Il�Ll���c=��.�r�.
r
�
•t�i:iL�
, r
�_. 1
�-��
* This N is from animal waste only. Xf nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and R may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning In 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
. of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
3

, r,ir S b:•p•r 1y[_} 1 ai f 4" �. j�+ i r` i',°
-i �'�$r''; Yy' ,.T+''�,y+, x• � �. � jk,AP'wt`�,.� diib, ';, f L� ��1 ;,,�+ r 1t+ {�1 �� to � I +� �„� '`'� .: ':
t ��f} a' ir� 1 �'y,' � 11r' ` yy r .a F 3 r�,r4 1�'. • '� k "��' "� K � � � r ✓' :;T' �'l. "��SS�. ��` .r
rp4a 1 "ht! . ✓�+�+i1°<✓a'� p.i: "'rt:t gyp, i
fo
SFrf'
%�� fin: �k'�f R,�r a ��� �`•!r^'{'�� ��+ { a. r�d r ',
�`
xa„.y.; � ^,, ,., � i � �4. � � ,F►.'' � �^,. �� y, � C+rn r�.� t,�.V �. z+�,�pyy� ,.�y,rs,X gyt��,T��, f, ��' ,._,..,r
VA
yu h. �) ��... ` ;Y _ ,. �' � x f F �• }$` ..:�.. 'r.. p"�'�.,} + +f kty 1'A"q� ��yYC X
TS •.,'� �asd d � � b � P 'r y � ' I S �J " y+ � +�►Y•r>jii •cie.P .. i}11 .� a .tl� 9j i y '�'al,
,
y.'.,� �* f4 {fit i , °" i+, •r�.'t fit"" 'i ..,, ^ a
PA
kti
/
rrR',+'� � ir'''�' * .=r 4fNE3 y'!1 •� .� ��('y�� '�Ay� at���� c , 2� ;� ,�' "`d'��.` �`r �'
� ±.. �,'' �� 'lyiti e,.,r. �7►'.�ht p '� '. 1�1V �+.. ' �� { � .y�w,�r` ,. * 1. ..; Wr�,�;r 4 �
-
'
yr
- �
77
l] awe d W�y�
1{,..�-. 1r ~'.r •/ 4 y�Y'If''+V '�'ti R ,/`1 \# j �S^•►� L A'" f{ ,J
it
. � ,r a ' •y - � # � 1 'yT � r i�. y � +v �+, a `I
i' � y � , �, -.� �i` e 4 r y f - wy�r1-�� �$•,� �`� Y YaPr g . , �..{ 1�=��,� ���5'y-a � �'�'� � �f' •:I
-, a. r • f� 1 ` � :, } i� bi / �l y �y f 7' J2Aj �!l.7
a�
..1 1 ih �" jlrr''SAM 7
.: - A ( ..r,•�_ Y � +�A' +a qua• y,�+�
r
y we'��}f t Pro + � f1 � +Y �'�J� ° ',���,a' 1 4 �. I .� � wit e'A> } •'b7r.t 1ra(!.t r`� � sir#•���
fir'"ii �...����;�+�^"�R� �r # `' ��ay ;�,• 'C'" �w s I� �r� [i,
411
-
r "�Y `. t�^�+- ';jy _ k ♦1� tip r-
'Y y e Y9 V `{L•SaF-W^ _ -ti CiD': '1 � � v u..,# �rs
XiA
t 1 •G �" 7 a �� � t a ,�. �
��+� ,��-x,. � dr', � �>d r ik.�y k � `fir # +ti'{•�?`rY't^,. wM I �
-.i,} F''ra. `f i +, i '+'" �i� t 8, + � .,, 1 `k •,� ,� et. � t - y I''yde �c �, * ,�,; a ' .: t+ "S'�:
I.
rj �`i
S"Ivd�: '° x. � �-r-,.L d.r �Ir•j:-dfyp. �-,$ �- � � _'j�� r' Q''�/L� r,�h"'j,Y'.s.. �ux�N + �� h .;.
ml
E x p o s u r eQljj
T k
Y #i1
F (L�
•' She'.
�� t

I i
W1"t'hJ7
/Pr
�
r'�"� � ..� � ,IA �+ .►s ": � } ss .#"��4 �� r� ITS
J% W� h` y/s tt4p,�+�d�,.{ ��'Y1'";s `��i.r ^jk�,
;r
7.
I twt � J k i 5' .�+(" � p. s r a i �► a � d ' , yc�ij„�rw V1r: ' aM��� .; , t
t 4� ;a+ kt( MV. -. Sl•• � � � Y�' rP l' t ._. 5 N r�,��'"4 r �r
x'�gjl�-
i-.A �''� 't�s r�Rl ♦ � "r 4"'� .w ¢P�� �:t i. 6 ���� �: ' � , 7
�. sf . .rr ny y/''i'}r. N r a'y o'� k ti �i 4•-
60�"
13
f re 9.3 s i. ti i a - s
�� ..�P 3 r�. �} '{}� N s ;r` � s_ti FAR S ��, e ° � n .r` .r'n ol,���; � �/� `^• :
} � t,� •''" ;.r .Y`! r 1,-� � n,� r � rf� dy+i`+� sAa ��=��',c.�'0" F.,
_ ' t-,." ' � L'ia �' Y�; ar ,Y�'• '1''rJ�+ �!;: � r" .'� ��p "'P ,� .d _ .,.. �„e9��F � ^�
-•°t i. r a.s. ...+ � .� +++���+++ r .. � 1 4 Ma.r � f, t� (J /) l��.+ -- /�� ��
.. � Xvrz t '.. r .. � 'y � y�.� A ' „'" i4 �ir ,r• / r r� ' TM�x�' � � °��9 A: � �
q
14
�"��'�x�,�x �:>'ie � �,y� � �•� lr h �,�u�. �� � ys
r ��� �, t,\ ,"rt�9r � •;.. � "�, r ar c'�' R°°�,v.a i wd'' �Yp' �* N A,�`
'�f;"r k 'lii y a g w.. ;3ry r....;k r 4..:;;;.� , � , r� ''�"�� r�,"9���."'•O �%J+.i .`"`..,",.•- A:.
n y Rai 6 I� ^ .�y� I t � r •. r � (�4 � , � ` „4 1�'� � «� ���� 9 � : � ���I��'fr�Y 9��
7r
l _ r • a �'` R' �l` '�� � �ti'�,.r� '`�F;. r''�'dk�'T�K ,�ib.�:t��`s °� a� igt+a+' �;� �..�J�Y �:.+ y .��.�,
*'�Syrr *�l /��v� p I���"' \l 'i.aryj'(�'{� ak si-.4�# tiffs �r� N� •"TW,���'` 4
77
#xpos%kre
� � � ,X n , r � /{S F IS/ ` 'r! �„'" p _ �''71 i ,;.�� <�;"� rTk��4 _ '�,�,M•.'sy,,. -•,r I,i,CyHy;
<.. �`: V .cl •,rY� rt,;�sfi`.. 'r� .�.r�•... � �"` .. �'�r ... _ 'Y�`.Ii R• _ n �i` � �Yi

yqy� i .a,. / F r 9+i1�14�i g :i �.i�•. � 't'- "�'' � t"� xt --�.`'si a'���, • ' •{ &..,fie'
[• ! a
! _"IZ
IA
,J �.,y` �h°�� °�� r r �j•N �, � p�'-{�f'�""" s+fp�l r+vw � m ?r��r f �
Nor
Ss
a
�„�'.� �` •FI s'fy'Y t8 t� I�,r! ,+r1' t, 34 y k .. � �;i � �' /`ap� • ��f ��^rw� v L� � ! G �so� ` °y�Y '',,� W+1Y I. u ® � ,r
J; S'�, ht^� "'1Cu Lt �%,1 � g`:.. �}#���� rt..�l J*'7�f ]>•'.i a 4�
S +syLr-r, ..it • �r1.. +�w.+m.'I� , {� 1 �.,.. �- 9 '4 ^+7 �, ." \y f � �y Y.�] .k � r;
r J 1
-w
} � .�� r ! u adR 1, r � i �,. _ --- E-• P . r
Pr
�IIy j} ,t
f' . '1/ f { �J,+'} �F� t - - v.,....+'•- s-. .. w,...•.•,.'*''�`�,+4 z g> x i
it 1. �. �Ykryr,�'1}.y .� ( 5�7 C� � 4 ur,. �• ��'•� f /-, .¢,�E .r, � �
�� m'tV'� r'+ e5r� p } _ — '�•, �r�J't e'y 'a� ++'"n� ,° � '� � '�s 'C'Y,,,,, V !!„ i :` � �,i "yi �'"�..d'� � { t'
y #y{I`'t �•�'��''' pyyr"`"`�`..8.' k�,,,+r� �'�" '" -.� 4�'' a'�. r�"'.._.� # +F,',y^^S .�..�„r.—.-t ,` � r ,Jq"_„t yyry�•� � s s7
"�tsdr°d+ y t:i� tC'.. r t '� � .-a dr �•w+p:T ��+'E° v iQ y#+"°�pletlr4 Ja9!�i �� 't; s ,?s �'e^ �,�'�.4 k:,��, t S
d{�,}y,lrjj�� rJ:� ,Jj�-r ��� V a �"l'Ft�F{!,'i6 `�5+1 i��'a+a x,..yd'lAq��.r �`� .'y + �r � � t h•� ;�.i ��9� '� 4 .y E
d}
•}.!'x
# ,�a;yj i jr i r C } n re g
;'�}'�- � a°�: •�'4. 1xr Sy,, �r. �.: w� i +.. h y i'•� �k �,i`d.,yr,;�.4d•+t`M ' f
i ,r: •mac ,g•�^'� �:� .- � f'i - "1--'xx' �" a+ j
�.. Y'�Y. �� ,�f'::�'� �,.--*t •',»ri" � w 4„i''�y 1 � lid ;: rs
T :S �+ � �`i.�` ! Yf� �Y ��4° `'�� � . Fr �'A'H�P`F" �,. *r ... ; •1 '. I
y 4• l r� i` - ..f
-d �ra
W L �^ �,+j'Y,,,r•r 't�4c+►i,i�c
1 A 5 � � i� J � I... '.� 'i !.Fist �,.1��,�1 ,:, i ✓y �1�' �+" J A{4 P !
� � � k `A' xi .+ W sr� re : pY rx � i o ��. �: � .+r • X �d"a ,u+,,+� i ��t•�� 1 � 4,.� �i v ..1
� r 7 '� v. 1 �' 4 it ,,, # "ti#'� •.}�' +r +" �' `�'� 3 r ', '
�y1:
1 -.
,4 �tr^
4 �. ggpp''
' 19 �} +'i� dF x'✓p f.. sl1'� /j �,l'. 5�5,ar 1� { �,', y' 1']i4,�h1'P M3° ��1 +•arr',..
'ii
_` 1 {, •� � �, � � ���,#�� { y ti 1 i �,•�: 7 rt . +.t ✓r1 ty 5 ! F ,�. [' r 4 J R 7 r ti + '; -; i'� � e i.
`�
�' � � � ..�.,� i��� i. �. \�'1 a 5✓<f; r � �i �•_ y A, -� r7=J'� 1 q+ .>rt `�i = c .�•. �,�p 1 .�, y % �
}y'"'�`E
kw�7°Lv
',T' , •k s+. 1� tf�'d 7. [-.4 v 9'-X� _ �4 � �y � J � .X�.syTP�� f� a�',#t �1 i"
A 71 �'��1� l.+f t�i a/ e -_ � '�• e�,q �a� ` S 4 ; � '�}',x+ -
1 � L
e, A tib,.#�44r r N y quo i {j rf
k ti}., . r ` rf 1 �1 P+k ti` i,W .it !y t'�16� �#k Mi•. , � Y}�
`�;c '�rrr,W emu' k�•"•� f � t'ro •T'N 1 ,.�+ � � � �i bd b"�1'tk� !['`}' fiy rN � ;
_ , . e �'.�`.41r•. _ it � � 9,,, i � e ; '� .., .. r�, ,y .>�
ExpQ ukre „' #� of
Fgrrr%
oil
+«�.w- '�^''' � y' .�..� �,� f ti w i� t �-'.°R'� •:� �;,�A: r,.pl"'.r�.t'r 7�1 ?�

lExpostiLre

��,,�� � � � � ��yf� '1. I' 'r may. •Qi'
yj�
a •�I r rr.1 , fi +� +�� s H 4w<< t r ra
�" `°ram sll� � ,' �� ""-•.. s;Jv.,i � �-�" 'rcu, +" , d .s
:
,r 4!
ram.% .�, �+r q� � _�7.�_ � �+�^'•'1M1 � � r?.' y .: �j0.'rFl"'" y r ��
:�� nf::ic, ._f. _6i��:7C . �•' �Er � :, i���e. '.'�'L��AF��, * r �Jr,l,'Yir9NF. 17'Klea-S .�i.. �d.1
'/r.�f 1�R:
f '� TT� Q'.� �,F�F 1. , ; 'r � �� � ���..•
Pi
A Tr
ef
MY ! ,j11
+ r 4�, 1..'r d.. _a `'� ' ," * , *�Zr�+i'�'�c � d •uh 1 pp'�.� 2• s '
r
.Y
d�
4 � A
ko> ,
QZ
i S � � mac+.e *� 4, a 1 y•
IN
ISO
511
r ° i` ,/ _. �'� � .. p'. �'.., r , • e'L cif `''' '' s. '..�. - ,� � k
G d .`gy
CP
dmL
mow^01,
Au
`3
E�le�:..Lri +k?. Y, 1a �L�S'��' 4",� � ►.r'.i�:Y, i[ s+i4 M� .,air.. ,d�� �..r.M_. `j^�
ExPoSuLfe

,�-
0
•
'Dw4 cl Pr 3"CZ1-
Table 2 : ACRES WE TffltM 132*5$
(Agreement with adjacent Ihndowner must be attached)
{Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of
## Type Per Ac. 'Itilized Application
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 5, Sf
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced 1016 Q
Surplus orcgefica WT. I I
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic .sates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of ,nutrients or other elements.
4

•
Your facility is designed for i _ days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
- LQ MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation q4,1
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (fo=erly soil
conservation service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
(Use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)
•
pt�d r (anPa WS- rn o� �QQ►.� ,0r4
lr)&4r, j UJA JoN
5

E
i ' 1
0
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
animals X-(amt.) waste/animal/year =
D (amt.) waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
N Q_animals X 7o lbs. PAN/animal/year = 10xlbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for.waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface application:
0 Table I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
� -� -�
� Fl r✓J ■ft ll�
I
If3 S.L"�'.7f".. �
�;�
���
�I:!•f^-.1LGtir-�
-.-
�
�
�
1/ i•p1I'��'3Ii.,:1
Total I ouA„ c,
* This N is from animal waste only. Xf nutrients ,from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
3

n
U
46
E
•
_ ..
-
_ -
•ACRE1%;\'-�Ts!%'Y.�R— Sri
(Agreement with adjacent lbndowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
*
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 Q.8 51.1151
Table 2
Total `1 1
Amount of N Produced 14, 1o4D
Surplus or efici 4,711 111
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan .must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
4

CJ
•
•
Your facility is designed for days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
LP _MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation qq,(
Call the 10"cal Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly soil
Conservation service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
(Use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)
1
r
A �
► • ' / C •
PwnP Ar4a
hor V,,y WAJON
5

YJ
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Agy;discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharget are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues.
2.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients.
O4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil
loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" required by DEM.
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No pond ng should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
O crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent
8

` ■AI A A -
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
• of the leaf area is covered. This'should not normally be a concern where diluted,
low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on
soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up
released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting
of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate
vegetative filter strips are present.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
• by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways
that discharge directly into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates
provided the application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm
event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the
vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
�i

•
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at.
the farm office and at the office of the focal Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
46 Name of Facility owner : "Q,ad CaLLn a7L_mCL-n
{please print)
Signature: Date: Z
Name of Manager (If di f f erent f rom owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: dFleaae print) p
Affiliation:
Address (Agency)0.
1 • 1
Signature: ODate: a1A9&;4!_
10

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
0
DWQ 919-S lt- H-700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM q Iq - 54a - as1 3
SWCD 4 Iq-5ya-8A4o
NRCS q 19 - ,4a- aam4 &4.3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all
employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
1 December 18, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
O b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
V h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem
to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
2 December 18, 1996

5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name: _
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon RCS Consulting Engineer, etc.
a. Name: r'b . k G ��"� rd , VA
b. Phone: 'R 1q - SLl a:.- Zkay H
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify
the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

i
ment
Dairy Farm Waste Manage Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
• Dairy Production
®
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
®
Recommended best management practices;
®
Good judgement and common sense
Paved lots or barn alley
• Wet manure -covered surfaces
10
Scrape or flush daily;
surfaces
9
Promote drying with proper ventilation;
la
Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
• Urine;
®
Promote drying with proper ventilation;
• Partial microbial decomposition
0
Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
Manure dry stacks
• Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Provide Liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or mid -level loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation while emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions;
® Agitate only prior to manure removal;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surfaces
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Liquid drainage from settled solids;
•
Mixing while filling;
❑
Remove solids regularly
•
Agitation while emptying
Manure, slurry, or sludge
•
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
•
Volatile gas emissions
0
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry
•
Volatile gas emissions while drying
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
or sludge on field surfaces
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs;
®
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
•
Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid
❑
Flush tank covers;
while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain collection or • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 1
11

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Junction boxes conveyance
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers
and drawdown
End of drainpipes at lagoon • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volitile gas emission;
• Biological mincing;
• Agitation
® Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles • High pressure agitation; ❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
• Wind drift ❑ Minimum recommended operating pressure;
❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second stage lagoon;
❑ Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals Carcass decomposition
Standing water around • Improper drainage; ❑ Grade and landscape such that water drains away
facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads ❑
roads from farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Filed Labatory ; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 2
Available From:
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU - BAE
NCSU-BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension

f
• & •
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of Solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to
remove accumulated solids from gutters as designed;
❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where pest
breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of
solids to a depth of no more than 6 - 8 inches over
more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation -9 Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons
Growth and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of
decaying vegetative matter along waters edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Feeders • Feed Spillage ❑ Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
❑ Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter).
Feed Storage • Accumulation of feed residues
AM1C - November 11,1996, Page 1
iR Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
❑ 082K*r and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.

• & •
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes ® Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed.
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
❑ AAWVadequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613
AMIC - November I1, 1996, Page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
a Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of
the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public
body of water.
W Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture.
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make
possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or
animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)
0
0 December 18, 1996

Nitrogen Application Rate Calculated Using Soil Type and
S Realistic Yield Table For Chatham County
•
0
SOIL TYPE 205B2
APPL. DATE
WIITMM
_ • 1 w_ ._ for ._
1 \ a
:. 1 V.
-1
/
•
1 :
_ !_a.. 1 '
for iarauce
1 :
• a .
1

J A
0
L'
0
SOIL TYPE SOD
APPL. DATE
Rol
1
:! •
:.• M.
_
9no�
•MI- � i
i' • ,
01111
it
. •_
'• lbs
14 • k
Ir
Ir
.-.
1
• t -1
1_rFescue
hav:•
1
_.
!rSmall
grain1
1Aug-April
0
; -a. la
:- 1
RPM)
! r
1 �J • grazing
s t
' t
1r
• 1!
: t
• __t(
0
lip a.e 1 + _• _ 1__
•_ •
.•_ i •r
V.veerass for
! rMatua
forgrazing
: 1
SOIL TYPE 130B
APPL. DATE
!.:
is �__• 1
' 1
/r
MR111
:. • MCMI
OW:
1 r
1:
•.IJ. . 1.
11 1
RIM
1:
_ ._ 1i
11 t
T_.!.

r 1 6-0
i 0
Is]
Is]
NOTE: THESE ARE THE RECOMMENDED REALISTIC YIELD NITROGEN
APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SOIL TYPES LISTED ON THE PRECEEDING
PAGES. WHEN A CROP IS PLANTED THAT VARIES FROM THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FROM ABOVE
MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH .0200 REGULATIONS. IF
HAYLAND IS USED FOR GRAZING, THE HAYLAND APPLICATION RATE
MUST BE REDUCED BY 25 PERCENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE
CALL OUR OFFICE, THE PHONE NUMBER IS 545-8353, OR 542-2244 EXT 3.
20

May-77-04 02:40P CHATHAM SWCO
919 542 8267 P.01
Chatham Soil and Water Conservation
District
P.O. Box 309 • Pittsboro, NC 27312
[phone]
n wn v�r,r w e�w^^''w v wn�`iv�iv ^�n�nr `iwn vn^iv�w'�v~~ "V0'VV 0v W w0i
FAX: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
TO:
DEPT/AGENCY:
FAX NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(excluding cover sheet)
FROM:
PHONE NUMBER:
COMMENTS.

May-27-04 02:40P CHATHAM 5WCD 919 542 8267 P.02
Waste Storage Pond (WSP) Closure Plan
Chatham County
Date 10/28/03
Owner: _Mr- Harold Counciltn�za Facility No: 19-35
Address: _1806 Ronald Scott Road, Bear ('sock, N( _272Q7
Flione: 919-581-3633 WSP location: Fann is located can SR 2:318
approximately 3 miles Southwest of the intersection of Hwy 902 and SR 2318
Hydrologic Unit Number: 01030003040010 - NCDENRRegional Office:.Rai!ciglt_
Type and number of animals: 06u 140
Constructioln date: Jan 1997
Date animals removed: Feb 2003
DWQ status: in compliance
Length of time WSP has been abandoned: 9 months
Name of watershed: Deep River North Sidc
Dame of receiving waters: P.�eg ver
Volume of WSP at ESW crest:. 930,392 gals.
Surface ,acreage of WSP: .75 acre Dam to be breached? Yes
is your existing Waste Management flan CUITent as to land available for waste
utilisation?_ Yes _ If Waste MangagcTn nt Plan is not useable or sloes not exist
a new plan tntast be established.
The purpose of this WSP closure is to protect the duality of surface water and
groundwater resnurces and to eliminate a safety hazard for humans and livestock. The
ubjcetive is to remove, waste materials to the: maximurn uxt,ont praclicabic from the WSP
prior to closure in an erivirorunentally safQ rnann r using the following steps:
Waste water will be analyzed .and Applied to crops at :agronomic rates based on
Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE),

May-27-04
2
3
4
5
02:41P CHATHAM 5WC❑
919 542 8267 P.03
You must notify the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) at least 24 hours prior to
the start of closure. Contact' J. D Hester at: Raleigh
Regional Office, Phone No. _ _ , 919-
Also you must contact NRCS/District personnel at the same time. NRCS/District
personnel will provide you with a Closure Report Form for you to sign to verify
you have notified the DWQ.
For embankment WSPs, the liquid must be pumped out and the remaining waste
materials (sludge etc.) must he removed.
All devices used to convey animal waste: into the waste storage pond shall be
removed.
The site, after WSP closure, will have no slopes greater thmi 3:1.
6 All sludge (solids) shall be; applied at the rate of 5 ton_per acre.
This rate is assumed to be higher than actual so as to prevent over applying.
For closure records a solid waste analysis will be needed.
7 The proper removal of organics and nutrients and prevention of pollutant
discharges to surface waters is the responsibility of the owner.
8 VEGETATION; All disturbed areas shall be vegetated and maintained.
Use the following:
Lime
2 tons per acre
Fertilizer
1000 Ibs per acre
Fescue
60 lbs per acre
Mulch (straw)
130 bales per acre
NRCS/District personnel will determine quantity o:fmaterials needed when area
are ready to be seeded,
[IT, Zit_R traltz�Ai
NRCS/.DISTRICT Personnel must be notified when'WSP closure is to
start. Personnel will make inspections during the closure process to
verify all waste liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied
at agronomic rates, all input pipes have been removed, all slopoc have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed
areas.
NRCSIDISTRICT Personnel can be reached at 919-5 - 244 Ext. 3

7,r

In
0
a
n
N
03
N
01
01
0
U
3
rgn
Q
Q
I
U
11
M
N
O
1
O
n
N
i
q_
i
NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919) 733-2655 Report No: W09117 W
Graiff: Councilman, Harold Crpie5 To.
IBC-5 RoraIc Sc3tt Rd_
Bear eek, 4. 27207
F.._-.,. rite Analysis ReOrt farm
5,, 6iO4 Chatham County
I,
303v2
Tsmf 35---f3
5458 2TT9 `s769
1041
1?E7
294 38
53. 2 J33
5'4 -1S
Waste Code:
-,W9
ASO
ki��
Alih+ Cd
r9b At
Se
ti j2y_
-V C.
OW M% a_f(ta�ts�
Mwipti=
OR-N
368
4557
Ca Lamm 5U
1A-ea
commendations:
NearieM Available for First Crop
R
net basis :Other Elwomts
Moon (we( basis
WrSB a-- k od
t+ P205 K20
Ca .g S Fe
W Zit Ct,r
R
at C
b Ni Cd
Pb At Se U
&Mdws
13 &.0 2.4
6.2 2.3 0.66 11 A
0.19 C_06 0.03
T
034
soil �nra&
1.9 9.', 2.7
7.' 2.7 0.76 13.0
0.21 ".Qi OO4
T
I 0 t
Sarnole Info.
I Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
30(f Ji
T0FM 41.6
; 33.0 =&1 137 66.4
'0.0
".E7 0.30 321
0.:3 0-00
M, -v
Waste Code:
-AYM
Na A'i cd Pb
Al
Ss ti
SS Ci !-M CCE% XE(Kofl
LSD
A'03
752
732
Owaiptiart;
OR N
N*ry L Q SIB"..
urea
Recommerndations:
NutrienlsAvailable for First Crop
1 1000 Hons
Otfrer ElemerMs lb-0000 ltom
afrrcaricr.:lf&'a`tcd
N P*S X20
Ca &y S Fe A.
z2
Cu E 145 V
_ .WO .tii Cot it, Al Se U
3'ced.as
0.15 0.4e ' .5
OAD 0.39 C.CG 0.01 T
0.02
T C ca
II CE 63
SA-i IrCorp
0-21 0.50_ '.7
0.31 044 "A7 0.01 T
0.02 _
T "M
1 0.63 .

Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water ConserA ation
Other Agency 11
Type of Visit )D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9/Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
N t Ojerational resh d
.13 Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operate ore Threshold: 7 03
c
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name:
Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
a
❑ Swine ❑Poultry
Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0• ��
��s Longitude �• �� «
Design ': Current Design
Current Design Current
Swine
Ca aci Po ulation PoultEl Capacity
Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
1
10 Layer
I
ICR�airyr
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer
I
I
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
I Number of Lagoons I i I L Subsurface Drains Present IILJ Lagoon Area ILI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharges !& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 170
.,
05103101
❑ Ycs No
❑ Yes, No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
effNo
❑ Yes
,O'N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
E No
ZNo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Ap.Rjkadan
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop types(.'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Reauired Records & Documents Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ iffigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. 5ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes (21No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes (�V0
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Xj"No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ,0 No
❑ Yes g No
❑ Yes eEj No
❑ Yes PNo
El,
Yes No
[]Yes No
El Yes �o
❑ Yes �N (o
❑ Yes �Vo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes �_ZrNo
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes I�'N0
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. 71
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):ield Copy ❑Final Notes
emu' Cew�.� -w �y, 03. aa�
COKIsow.
7+
Cam-
Reviewer/Inspector Name r v — 5-%—OdD . Z3 9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Cit&= Date: D
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection 4 i�
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes Z(No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes NNo
05103101

4
FAX COVER SHEET
4 NORTH CAROLINA
FAXED DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N C DENR Raleigh Regional Office
NORTH CAROLINA Of~TMENT Of 1628 Mail Service Center
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
z- Pagesf including cover sheet
TO: tom,, FAX: 716-- 6aap
FROM: DATE: ®ly o3
SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:
Iya'j `F a
If you do not receive all pages, ca11919.571.4700 or fax back to 919.571.4718.

•
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number:
Farm Name:
Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
This Operation is:
Iq-3Y--
COu,S G r V n1 q.J 64 n trl, 4
! $O! n.0Vft a ScvtT /l UA-�
,t 9h- -I. C'LC&/c- Nc z7267
C 14+-j-44Wl
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
X out of business/no animals on site
closed out per NRCS standards
below the threshold (less than 250-swine, 100-confined cattle, 75-horses, 1000-sheep or
30,000-poultry with a liquid animal waste management system)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should I decide to increase the number of animals beyond the threshold limit
or the operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I am required to
notify the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals.
Signature: -
r--
Please return completed form to: DEHNR-DWQ
Water Quality Section
Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27526-0535
Date: Ik-`1' o 3
RR-4/97

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection? Operation Review © Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit o Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied,A= s
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
10 Not Operational 0 Below Thre4hibld
Permitted ® Certified ©Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operatell or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: l ca..tlt' 6 " ra:fi mot) _ County: ►� _
Owner Name:
Mailing Addr(
Facility Contact: !*"44CY [P.[]C�X►Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �h Operator Certification Number: 04V
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Z Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 1 •9 Longitude ' F-71 =«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I I 9 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I I j[_1 Non -Dal
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ ©ther
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number -of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding;Ponds /Solid'Traps © ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Stnicture 4 Structure 5
Identifier: f
Freeboard (inches): 106�r
05103101
❑ Yes �D No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [Z] No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes JX No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: I Date of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
C10Stlre plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes E@ No
❑ Yes [51 No
❑ Yes 5U No
g. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes W No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes R No
Waste Analication
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes S No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IN No
12. Crop type rac _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14 a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Z No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
lg. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
FXI No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(W discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
F;61 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
07 1violations or deficiencies noted during this visit. Youno further correspondence11this visit.
I •il I I 4 r1.1 1 1 1 1 � I I AI
,rtra }
a I7 1 1 r< 1 I I II 1 S/ i 1 � 1 /�` 1 I! !1 11 1 !. .y IF'.�y,r�jy� �R �$ ,' �S '
..
'.-. l
al,lh1 FI' y 'M _� 11 1 Y y�..11 _�_C
1 _f hl�r j.l�y [ �.It�� I� _S r .yj4 XS !'"aeyhPFi'�� y! .,lvl
1 1}. 1 k ISO I I 17 _ F i f...k'f� ■FieldCOPY FinalNotes ."�
%�t .1 .�� y u,�ir ,j I• .�R. y. h a`i
` s 4 t} �i�
Reviewer/Inspector Name .'..?sslid 7�
1t6,i�rrlLliu�INa r:�
, .,�^t,, -r �,yyf ��es54r+,� p oe �/�I�tkT'^ - :1�'yy� `n.. �F'anr+y '1r�'"'� _ .�^v^,
$n I� tiki�rJ AP! f ����;y Y E �tMl"Uld .Ail +I f�{j.ru'�{y1�y'gy�y�y� 1 i
YIIiWYYGuYi.�aWrs'FjIfK•'k4'� rOJksi� SIFbf'�•i'YYfY•4+W1 n�!Reviewerfluspector
Signature:
OSIO3/0I V U Continued

Facility Number: ltq —351 Date of inspection O
Issues
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
—3T Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 5a No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101

FO Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Ocompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit J2rRoutine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: rum Time:
IQ Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permltted,orCertifted [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above
rAbove Threshold:
Farm Name: (-0A0tPall 00_-1 County: C_%, _
inL
Owner Name, _/f Phone No:
Mailing Address: f*� ANC° S&007— pe'y P.ta._t f AX_ 2-7)67
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 261137 TIC$
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry A"Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulatiom
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattif, Cavacitv Po uladon
❑ Layer ReT13airy1 / 6
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dal
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Discharges & Stream lionpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 60
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
4?h
7L If
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes �Nlo
Structure 6
Continued

s
Y
Facility Number: q — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes )ZrNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
/
elevation markings?
El Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponndding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ;2 No
12. Crop type �M &-L�,/
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes .: No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes Rio
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes .,eNo
Required Records & Documents
have
17. Fail to Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ONo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Vq to Management Plan readily available?
{ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.} / I0
El Yes No
I t)1 ZYl�t f Z
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, wasteanalysis& soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ONo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes 01NO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ;2<0
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility follow-up by
[--]Yes ONo
❑
require a visit same agency?
Yes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes WNo
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #); Explalwatty YES: answers and/or any recommendations or any o er comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use.additional pages as necessary): Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Ltd - 4A
Reviewer/Inspector Name FIA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101
Continued

R�
Facility Number: 12— Date of inspection I
Odor iS3=
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes Zf'No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes 01,40
❑ Yes reN'o
El Yes io
❑ Yes 1Vo

e
Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 01RO'outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 01 Time:
O Not Oaerational O Below Threshold
Permitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated �orr Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .....� LC' ...................... County:..ti.c! !I� !!"�^" ............................. ....................
OwnerName: ............Z........:.`.:.!:!!!A-4.4.*L..................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ......... !e��.....1?00..`JiJ.0.. l.' .............a .................................................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ...................................................................................................... Integrator:....................................................................................
Certified Operator:,,.... ( ,� :.
,.Q.q......................................... Operator Certification Number:..��... za. z
...............
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 2111cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' i 66 Longitude a 6 66
Design Current
Swine Canaeity Ponalation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer I I Dairy 1 1{10
❑ Non -Layer I I fo Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I Number of Lagoons ( J❑ Subsurface Drains Present Jj❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
ll Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
tructure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .....'. �9-. . 7z
......................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes.E�No
❑ Yes qlo
❑ Yes 00
❑ Yes
11
ONO
❑ Yes
O No
❑ Yes
P10
❑ Yes �lo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection S l
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes /
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes P'TTo
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;2'1�0
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes P'Vo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 00
11 • Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes
12. Crop type $ f Cy" , 'S'*X qaLft
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15• Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal W�$t�BNlpnagement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste Zafi y is & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
' �Q•YiQ1���►4�s:ox il�f ��e��i� ire i��e�• �i�•z`t4g fi��s'v�s�t; • Y:o� wit�•>�ee�i�ye l�o �u��$�'
corres�oncience: a►auti this visit. ....... ............... • ....... ... .
❑ Yes []�No.
❑ Yes Q'No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes 0No
[:]Yes j'No
❑ Yes ❑_No
❑ Yes `P No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes P-6o
❑ Yes P`'' 0
❑ Yes Ido
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �'No

K Facility Number: —3'57 Date af'Inspection a
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes PN
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighbo g vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes 0Vo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 2<
❑ Yes J2 <0
❑ Yes [Tf4o
❑ Yes ?T"N' o
5/00
J

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
.[3 Division of Soil 4fid Water Conservation - Compliance:Inspection
Q'bivision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
JQ'Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number �{ T 3 'µ Date of Inspection I IrIlz ?- l"
Time of Inspection �] 24 hr. (hh:mm)
101 Permitted Certified [] Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: _„......................
Farm Name: ^' ^� ..............' h `.. .......
`,ow.....` ............. .................... !� r"L�F...................................... County: ... �C 't �i�
Owner Name: IA.4 s50 ce Y"_d'Af Phone No:
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
FacilityContact: ...........................ppqq� /n�.........................................riitlle:...........................................................r... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ...... .1.A..".6........... R a .-.. i) S C, o +f /�!.:........ 80A �.........,`.1............................................................................ ..................... .........., ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................ .................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
.....:...............:.:.:........................................................................♦.....:....-......................................................................................................................................•...•.......T
Latitude ' ' .6 Longitude =• ' 44
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
IEEE
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cat le Capacity Population
❑ Layer Dairy ZC7
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes VNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Slate'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M'<0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ................................... .......................................................
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
/To
M O
❑ Yes
0 No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to thk integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes To
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 55,40
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [DC
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes M/No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ►' No
1 L Is there evidence of over application? r ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes Q'No
12. Crop type Car T a S, 1.��o e3cu e 1Q J4r( S/W+ 1, OfUAI
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 2'Ko
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Of4o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 6<0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes MN/o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes M o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El Yes Ta
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. ire any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
©' �'�1a yI ioos.ek 00jejeneim Were hoc dt�trir�g t��s'vis�tt Yoh wi�� l�eeeiye �o �u>ct�er
. • carresuoridence: ahatiti thus :visit. .............. : . : .................. .
Comments (refer to question #).:. Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendations or any other commen
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
lb ^iv1i4 390-j
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes ET/No
❑ Yes [2/No
❑ Yes 3' O
❑ Yes &1N0
❑ Yes O"No
❑ Yes 940
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes ► No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� ,,.�� Date: s 2 > _ I
3/23/99

9Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number / f Date of Visit:
IM Permitted Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered
Farm Name: ....A.� t ................C�o.I ,..4L-MArf.........!�...�.2�.....................
Owner Name: 3� /
s.....�,.I................................................................. ........................
Facility Contact: ....
Mailing Address:..
........................................ Title:
Onsite Representative: , '!,A ar ....C-A.yA'—,- L &1-4,A ........................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ...........................................
Location of Farm:
WONot
rime:Printed on: 7/21/2000
Operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:....... ...................
PhoneNo: . ......................................................................................
................................. Phone No:...................................................
Integrator: .................................
Operator Certification Number: ..... z°!A7................
IW . r. L R -5 .� g az L At'
AL
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Ocattle ❑ Morse Latitude �' �' ��� Longitude
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer airy 1 14o I
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagnnn Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ElSpray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Watcr of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is ohservcd. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? 01s,"pillway
Structure 1 Sll'LiCLure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: ..............'J. ��
..................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes �0
❑ Yes ,ONO
Structure 6
Continued on back

0
Facility Number: II Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes Ao
(If any of questions 4-6 was. answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Pf4o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Pilo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 2No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �iO
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes Mo
12. Crop type res S.'rGA-GE_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes '10-Ko
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 10N0
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
z q9
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Gene.r oz
Pe t readily available?h4
18, Does the facil fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ W , c ecklists, sign, maps, etc.) � � � r �����
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ i gation, f oard, wart alysis & soils p ports)
20_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
. ...Ql iikQnjs'ojrs d fcpe ctes v�gre A ;e4� l3t�riiq�g t .. • . . . i...xse ..too . . . . .
cor'resporideii& about: this visit:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of faciltty to better explain situations fuse additional„pages as necessary) :;.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes P44o
❑ Yes ?No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ,[No
❑ Yes 9t
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ,No.
❑ Yes' No
❑ Yes Zj'_N_o
-7l F;esuA-,_ CA-Iti2- C"jt_S' 6 rral)� 5.1,v� c.�_i 0 S pr.i � n! Sr PE [ �t/}l l.S 4V�qnoS A4 a vJ,'n/ G T-,C- � A`
/11 A �Pi
�J -1 rrfS� ct'
CNEc�G•� �<S � 1R 0 �Y T€ crJ,v� u4(, �P£c� nt t i`t' �����)
i JA c Sa
:� -
Ll
Sat ,
sb%ems sxF� c.r
f-IrGN P ( 476, CO. tf o1 i z,, rr77Y 6 � �� SZ) r,,;FJG•r_c
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (INL — r1j - M I— Date:

FactitY Number: Date of Inspection 30
Odor Issues 00
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 2�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 2J`No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ANo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes .N'o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes PNo

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Archie &Had Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Rd
Bear Creek NC 27207
Farm Number: 19 - 35
Dear Archie & Harold Councilman:
1 fflZ'5*A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL R£SOURCE5
You are hereby notified that Councilman Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
S' cereiy,
I-VIor err T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (woo encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number �- �J Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Irv1A (&Vj1kPart H eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:140kez,�C
Date of site visit: 2111 M I
Date of most recent WUP:2AIii/
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: G q6 pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
tklAfv�,�r�PA.Detefination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - 171 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

gq
611075 VALCIL,
1777711
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Mivision of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
I- Date of Inspection t0 t
Facility Number Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Registered Wcertined [] Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not O erationa! I DateLastOperated:..........................
Farm Name:.... C:.0U.y' 6.1,nAa..a.........�Yb!.4........................................... County: .................. C-1-ki .... ........................
Owner Name: ....�t�R'j�.�r..,, ..Tr!i Y�?.�4,,,,...Y!,t-!..� t'v� av�...,. Phone No:,.....�s�!QI..r.,J�t,.................
Facility Contact: ..iT..!!1 rald........... 11L iG.[.�141�1Y�tle:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ....... !JG?..........
)11.�........s........................QAI^..........
......................
..z�.�t`7
Onsite Representative: ....4-6y-.L2.1 4 Cz.Q n CI!.^A.cin.................... Integrator:.............
�(�� .
Certified Operator:--......... Sr.4.fro..ui..............................G!... lry. G KI.............. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 • 6 ® « Longitude ®' ® 4 ® 46
Design.: Current Design Current
Swine Capacity . Population Poultry Capacity :.PopulationCattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer airy b
❑ Non -Layer 1E1Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity. C
Total SSI,W
utrent
►ulsion
y�
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Fietd Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
BNo
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0-1Cl0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
9-Ko
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[]Xo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/n-in?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ONO
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�lo
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
E2/No
ODoes
any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
9240
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
M o
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
[!]-No
7/25/97

w
r
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ff0n{1�.....................
Freeboard (ft): .........11........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [9<0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �10
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Wo
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste -Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type C—b r ln......................................-�:u�............................. ...... ..... r1�.e1../......,
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
00. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No violations or defciencies.were ntited-during' this.visit. - You'w'i11 receive no further
correspondence about this visit:
❑ Yes Ergo
❑ Yes EKo
❑ Yes Ugo
❑ Yes 2lo
❑ Yes 0190
❑ Yes Q.P+to
❑ Yes O'iQo
❑ Yes CWO
❑ Yes LJ'No
❑ Yes Wio
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes R<o
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes RN^o
Comments (refer to question #): explain any YL. answers mr d/ any ii�eroidumendations or any oWet, corrtnienfs
It,se drawings of & ihty Gt► bettex'explain sttuatio�as. (use additia�aaI pages as nec ssi }: � s
7/25/97

AR
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of UWQ inspection O Follow-up of sWC review O Other
Facility Number Ilan oi' Inspection
Nine of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: C'onnty:...�ibF .T!i�!'�..............................................
............................................................................................................................ ..
Owner Name: ......................................
PhoneNo: ...............................................
Facility Contact: ................................ ...Title Phone No:
MailingAddress: ................................. ......................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: Kl1h........... ................... Inte;rator:................................................................... ...................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude E_70
° .6
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude • 6 44
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer airy
❑ Non -Layer I I I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JEI No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imuucts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
it. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made''
h. If discharue is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if dischar Te is ohservcd. what is the estimated Ilow to L>al/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system'
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection &'freuttnent
4. Is storaac capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identi Fier:
Freehcn�rd (inches}: !,�,,,r,,,..„....,,.
.......................
Slruclurc 5
i
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
I
❑ Yes
No
Structure fi
l /6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Dane of Inspection
5. Arelhere any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(1f any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Avrilication
❑ Yes
TO
❑ Yes UNo
❑ Yes 7.No
❑ Yes [INo
❑ Yes [ZNo
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (2 No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes /� No
12. Crop type .G.f1.. ... ...,..���..............................................................................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designates[ in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 2jNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(.ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 No.vio.Iations•or deficiencies .weire' noted daring ;this visit:. I'oti �ivi�l.re�ceive na furtheir
.... s.... n .. a.b... this .visit.. , ....... I ... , .... • .. I ....... I ....................
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes [rNo
A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes CKNo
❑ Yes 2(No
❑ Yes [ Mo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 7No
1/6/9�

Q Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered MII Certified 0 Applied for Permit ❑ Permitted JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
,..
Farm Narne:....P A., . 1'...,g ..... r!P. !�t�, 4.t.fl]LL!^�................. County:.... "h }LYE.............................................
Owner Name: ....................I......�� , `.......!'-!,'... ..U...: Ia&flAark�'n......... Phone No:..,................. L. . 33 ......................
Facility Contact:.... ................................ f...................................... Title: ...... OW.',4i�� ............................... Phone No3c�.'�..e,r,',�3, (.n
Mailing Address ...... L ....a fl ?!f.0..... !i. ... k.. go... ►!: ....L.` r....... C�Q7..... ..........................
Onsite Representative:,...... ........+h�.,fl�l,c�.�ta................ Integrator:....,......,..............................................,......................,....
/1 t
Certified Operator:.............gaXJ6......L dX1 +...,. Operator Certification Nuunber:..G,.Q�%R r�, l,► .,,..
Location of Farm:
Latitude �' ��' C" Longitude
Design " Current ,
Design :. Current
Design _ a Cureettt
. Swute Capacity ,Population F;
Poultry Capacity Fopulat�oa Cattle
Capacety _>Papuiattbn ="
❑ Wean to Feeder
r,
❑Lay er
Dairy
(j
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Mon -Layer
❑Non -Daisy
[] Farrow to Wean
4
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
4
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design `Capacity
q .
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding 1E3 Subsurface Drains Present 0 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaL/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
El Yes RKo
ElYes [O No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑,N/o
Yes 19<0
❑ Yes 02' o
Yes 9No
❑ Yes Me-No�
❑ Yes R<O
Continued on hack

Fuciiity Number: j
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes M'No
Structures (Lagoonsliolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc,)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
3
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes 2No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....... 2 ........................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ....... V ....:....................................................................................................................................................................................I....
IQ Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 21(0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes wNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;Z0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 24
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............ fkta...... M.P.M........................................................................................................................ ......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Id No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
I' I 0
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0<0
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2
L4-
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
[] Yes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities 01ft
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes;eNo
25. ere an additional problems noted which cause noncom Rance of the Permit?
� y P P
❑ Yes
®-No.violations or deficiencies. we re- noted- during this"visit.- You:Wi1l receive -no ftirihei~:
:-.•:•. .-:•:�:::�:•:•.•:•.�.�.:..•.•:•:•:•:�:•.-.:•:•.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: CId1V Ut -1r,6 60 2a— U , Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 15, 1997
Mr. Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Road
Bear C;,!ek, NC 27207
Subject: Enforcement Action
Councilman Farms
Case No: CF 96-007
Farm # 19-035
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Councilman:
LTI.KMAI
A&I
�EHNFi
In a letter from the Raleigh Regional Office dated January 17, 1996 you received notice that the
Division of Water Quality was considering an enforcement action against you for a discharge of waste
to the waters of the State. After reviewing the enforcement case, I have chosen not to assess civil
penalties for these violations at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not preclude the
Division from assessing civil penalties for the noted violations at a future date. Assessments may be
levied for additional violations should they occur.
Further, I would like to take this opportunity to stress that a certification form for your animal
waste management system must be submitted to Division's Central Office Compliance Group at the
letterhead address by December 31, 1997, After that date all conditions of your certified animal waste
management plan must be followed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Shannon Langley at (919) 733-
5083, ext. 581. 1,
cc: Enforcement File
,, , Raleigh Regional Offim-usmL­
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. E.
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A41A
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 21, 1997
Mr. Harold Councilman
1806 Ronald Scott Road
Bear Creek, North Carolina 27207
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 19-35
Councilman Farms
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Councilman:
On July 14, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the cattle operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
holding pond had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
I would like to remind you of the requirement to have an approved
Animal Waste Management Plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must
be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone],
Sincerely,
JuUy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Mike Sturdivant, Chatham Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, 4% FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500,6 recycled/10% post -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review �.11►�_
�QAnimal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
toutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection '1 4
35
Time of Inspection t-t: 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm So
tatus• EItegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated; ................................... ....... .................................................... ........................ . . ..... ..................
Farm Name: ..r-!.1!!1,e.,�1t...,�hY.L��............ .......... ....... »........ County:(�.��1,.......... ....................................
Land Owner Name:. r.4 1he .. Y' q ti?Yls.�1.�f1flA��,Y�1...... Phone No:��I s). - ... ..........................
Facility Conctact: .... q A'V0.0s.111, .. Title:..C........ Phone No: .... 11.�`a . .........................
Mailing Address:_�.�5�a. l_E�.S,],l`..54 `r..._4.........2�.,Z.0..... ......... ....... __..... _........
OnsiteRepresentative:... t ! .... ... �,,%.t j................ Integrator: ». ...... .»...... »....... »....... ......... .............................. ............
Certified Operator:.. .VA.....(C,: ..........r.............. Operator Certification Number: ,...�: 6CV1�....»...
Location of Farm: S� �� t(,z vw. , V c\r�, � k\Wl +.12
Latitude Longitude �• 0` �«
ype of Operation and Design
.Design
TV UU
Ca . i Povulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
10 Farrow to Finish
❑ other
Current. Des
I'ouitrY. Csn:
10 Non -
:...Current .Design Current
Po ulation Cattle Ca acit .:::Po ulatic
airyI ISO I lsO
Total Design Cap
Total S
icily
LW
Number of Lagoons / Holding^ -Ponds r —, ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 2<oo
❑ Yes U-Pdcr—
❑ Yes +❑-ro-
❑ Yes Pro'
❑ Yes Rgo
❑ Yes M-Ko'
❑ Yes 94
❑ Yes Po
Continued on back

Facility Number: t 9..... —..5 -
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Pondsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
.0 �....» . ..» .....�........ ....... _- .................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ®'Io
❑ Yes Q-Xo-�
❑ Yes W-o
❑ Yes L7'1qo_�
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...:ir.M, 1�. ..». �.a,.►........ .».... »........ »............ .......... ........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?cam-
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Comments (refer to question # ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to. better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
❑ Yes E 1vo
❑ Yes W-90'
❑ Yes M-N-6-
U'res ❑ No
❑ Yes M,
❑ Yes GKo
❑ Yes aKo
❑ Yes 91-1V0
e-Tes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,..C�10
❑ Yes lt� No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
tck . r%ex" "IbIkA►y
�
2A . S•K c O_

SWC-A'llArirnai';Feedlof O
104zoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DCVO inspection O Follow-up of I)SWC-revimir Q Other - - . 1, I
FacilityNumber
Farm Status: ��yCS C EK2
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: �. NC' !¢ev/ F?WA4 County:
Owner Naine• J�IPG � ,��OLD��„(�!/�,� G�'1�-/j/ phone No: Sg !- 9 6 3 3
Mailing Address: r a go ovQ,k-4�1 SGo� r ,[I L�� G Mew a '2,zo 7 _
Onsite Representative: --- ' Integrator:. —
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
Latitude •F—T OK Longitude �• �� Du
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: _
Type of Operation and.Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
l/�3Qo
2. Is discharge from
Yes
any observed any part of the operation?
❑
lid No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/mia?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2140
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
M-No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
Lv! Yes
❑ No
maintenance imp rovement?
Condnaed on back

b. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? i lh. .
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Axe there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures fLaPoons and/or Holdine Pondsl ; y ,;,C .
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 : i Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 ••
. /) i W.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
{If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses ad `
immediate pubic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify D WQ)
15. Crop type 5 /t&a- 4(-
16. Do the active crops differwith those desr-zriated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?'
P 4 g
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? '
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?'
For Certified Facilities Oniv
20_ Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ••
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with owner or operator in charge.
-r. .,•�•,.. ❑ Yes �o
ss ;
B Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes W"No
El Yes W440
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes ®io
7
❑ Yes %
❑ Yes. ;�Xo
j4e/s ❑ No
❑ Yes OlNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,aw.,
❑ Y
Zynvo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes - ❑ No
❑ Yes- ❑ No
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes " ❑ No
Cornmeats refer'to estion ;t ' Explain:`an ° QIl �. y:ES•attSWelSridlor8nyr�C'oInmC�d2�oL1S 8ittan�t11C#?COI17IIrentSsa� :=„z;•
.use.draYvtiugs of4fapiiity to beats= ezpIai situations fuse addiiianal pages as necessar y, IM
I+ 7 G�rr_ �L/ �`/GTi` � J%/L' /%� �'��• C i/.�. � ! ��: �I :�✓1 ` �F'�Ifl%I/TO-� I�•�T7y
Q
%N �,,rj u-Nc�i:�.�: ; .K c-s� -- � NL•r."���1%, a�v.��� ��s `� I.�,�. -��� � ;��t- �!,'1-�a�.�.
��✓l�i��P�`�' I(II �'J'���?G�•- rl1l;C� � 11 '�'�--��77 _-�-/t�ir�r/; ;''�' ,%Tjy�:rp}���:��f.. •1
J � - '~' .'-� � 1L1S � C j 7Ui1 Y /�. �'%Ir�� /�%� f r (� 1 .` J�j:�',r•.' i
'n Q ��, r� r,• ;! .._i �i.. r'f.' !' i::' Ci Ij;ri r'" i o ,-7r�
/ t '! ;� -�r os.,�l. c���-,; �,�� �,'�.�,' ��rc•. `%!� jig=_��.
i�i
�W f �ra �at*; �i �7G5 - N��� '� Jr' M is wa,
i�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc. Division of ;rarer Quality; Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` •
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary H N
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Archie and Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
Rt 1 Box 179-D
Bear Creels NC 27207
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Councilman Farms
Facility ID #: 19-35
Chatham County
Dear Messrs. Councilman:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an QIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files AW Water Pollution Control System W 4 Voice 919-733-W26 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission r� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r1.3r rc_
180.6 Ronald
Bear Creek,
January 25,
Mr��r
buster
NC DEnvironment, Health & Natural Resources
Ralgional Office
3800tt Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Letter regarding waste management plan
Councilman Dairy Farm
Farm No. 19-35
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Scott Road
NC 27207
1996
In response to your letter concerning our intention to secure
an approved waste management plan we have taken the following actions:
I. We have contacted the Chatham County Conservation Service
to assist us with the construction of a holding pond to
collect and store animal waste from our concrete area.
Any discharge from our milking parlor will also go into
this pond.
2. Representatives from the Chatham County Conservation
Service have been to our farm and surveyed an area for the
construction of a holding pond. This survey was forwarded
to an engineer in Raleigh to determine the best location
and size for the construction of a holding pond.
3. The engineer visited our farm on January 17, 1996 to
personally look at the site, and determine what other
items, such as guttering, that will be required for us to
obtain an approved waste management plan.
4. We have signed an application with the Conservation Service
to obtain cost sharing funds. It is my understanding
that funds have been reserved for this purpose, and that
they will work with us to obtain an approved waste manage-
ment plan for our farm.
5. Until we can construct a holding pond, we are spreading our
solid waste at every opportunity that the weather permits,
in order to avoid any runoff from our manure stack.
If you need any further information please let me know.
Yours very truly,
?)or,14 e��
Harold Councilman, Partner
Councilman Farms
HCjpc

%
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 17, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Harold Councilman
Councilman Dairy Farm
1806 Ronald Scott Road
Bear Creek, NC 27207
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation of Loss of Deemed Permit
Recommendation for Enforcement Action
Councilman Dairy Farm
Farm No. 19-35
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Councilman:
The subject facility was inspected on November 28, 1995 and
December 1, 1995. An additional follow --up inspection was conducted
on December 8, 1995. The following violations were determined to
exist at the subject facility:
I. There is no holding pond to collect, treat, or store the
animal waste. Currently, the solids are pushed out onto a
denuded area that slopes toward a creek approximately 200 feet
away. Waste and runoff from this area is reaching the creek.
The denuded area is caused by intense cattle traffic. The
cattle have access to the pasture across the road through a
culvert under the road. This culvert is at the headwaters of
the creek.
2. The parlor water is piped and discharged at the edge of
the creek. During the inspection, a white substance,
presumed to be milk, was being discharged.
Animal operations in the State have been deemed permitted by
the Division in accordance with Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual nondischarge
permit is not required if certain critieria are met. A major
requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not be a
discharge of any wastewater from the operation to the waters of the
State.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

w
Mr. Councilman
January 17, 1996
Page 2
The discharge to surface waters noted above is in violation of
this rule, and is subject to enforcement action. The discharge to
surface waters without an NPDES permit is a violation of General
Statute 143-215.1, also subject to enforcement action.
This office will recommend to the Director of the Division
that the deemed permitted status of this facility be revoked. The
Director will also consider whether a civil penalty is warranted
for the unpermitted discharge to surface waters.
You are required to respond in writing to this office within
10 days of receipt of this letter, detailing your actions to
eliminate the violations noted. Please include comments on your
intention to secure an approved waste management plan, and when the
plan is expected to be implemented. This office has been informed
that the Chatham County Natural Resources Conservation Service has
visited your operation, and has surveyed an area for installation
of a holding pond.
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how
you will collect, treat, store, and land apply your animal waste to
the land in an environmentally acceptable manner. We recommend
that you contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil
and Water Conservation District, the USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service, or the N.C. Cooperation Extension Service.
If you have questions concerning this notification please
contact Ted Cashion at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schu� er, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Chatham County Health Dept.
Steve Bennett - DSWC
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\councilm.ins

Inspection Form for Animal Operations
1. Inspection Date: November 28, 1995
2. Regional Office: RRO
3. Name of owner of property: Mr. Harold Councilman
Current Address: Harold Councilman
Councilman Farms
1806 Ronald Scott Road
Bear Creek, North Carolina 27207
4. Name of operator: Mr. Harold Councilman
5. Description of facility location: On Ronald Scott Road
(County Road 2318) about 1/2 mile north of Junction Hwy. 42.
6. Date facility began operation: Approximately 10-15 years ago
7. Date of last inspection: Unknown
8. Has facility registered with DEM: Yes
9. Does facility have approved animal waste plan: No
10. Has facility received a CAFO designation: No
11. Operation type: Dairy
12. Number of animals: 165
13. Length of confinement: Year Round
14. Are crops or pasture sustained in normal growing season over
any portion of the facility? Adjacent pastureland available
for land application.
15. Types of waste management: stockpile of manure.
16. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity:
None
17. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.:
Approximately 100 yards.
18. Groundwater depth: Unknown
19. Proximity of facility to surface waters: Approximately 20
yards.
20. Was an Animal Waste Discharge occurring during the
inspection? Yes, please see attached photographs.

Inspection Form For Animal Operations
Page 2
21. Are pollutants discharged into waters of the State?
Yes, please see attached photographs.
22. Was the subject discharge caused by a 25yr./24hr. storm
event: No.

JUL•-14-1995 15;-6 PRGM DEN WATER DUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
A
i
Site Requires I3nmediate Attention -
Facility No. ` -
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Al, Nl FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: NO'' ° � F , 1995
Time: I ' G T
Farm Name/Owner-
Mailing Address:_ A
County:
c�,q,erg,
r1 r
ear. 6't tk a
Integrator. Phone: q�U - jib f _ 3� 33
On Site Representative , fl e,''cll (VV0j ('f w1G _ Phone:
Phvs,ical Addressll..ocaton:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Czrdfication Number. ACNEW
Latitude: Longirtide: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foo{ + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: ��t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate Lind available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Cmp(s) being utilized: _ S-"I6r � j�rl
J
Does the facility meet SCS zainimum srtback criteria? 2()0 Feet from Dwellings? ed or No
100 Feet from Wells? (!�)or No
6e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Streatn? Yes or&
a:rimal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a U+SGS Map Blue Line? Yes No
Ts anurral waste discharged into waters of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system, or other
•;irrilaY man-made devices? Yes or(!9 If Yes, Please Explain.
'N K1 Inc raLihEy maintain adequate waste marlagernent records (volumes of ruanure, land applied,
•r. -
yn�
.L
1! �
Signatwe
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
q Q of - vey"f PA`l ur
1
„S
IsC4.fe
rah �
+ Use nchments if Needed.
/ 0 Cre e1 . /✓ 0_ YIAJ S v� �y 2
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Archie & Harold Councilman
Councilman Fanns
1806 Ronald Scott Rd
Bear Creek NC 27207
Dear Archie & Harold Councilman:
ffl'�WA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCESwv� ,
December 30, 1999
,a
DE4atlR RALUGI-1 REt�I�'�1,,�
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility NumberAQE35
Chatham Court
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
c �J/
Kerr T. Stevens, Diretor
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper