190032_PERMIT FILE_20171231

to
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
[Division of Water Quality
Facility Number
of DSWC review
Date of Insp\ ction I 1pjl�jjx
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered i rCertifleQd, (O Applied for Permit O Permitted —31
Farm Name:.. b._'.`akd....... ...... 1..ru t-Tarh
OwnerName:..........�.........�.�%�'........................................................
Facility Contact: .k V r.a.A.4 �t................. Title:..........................,
Mailing Address:.... IlG..i!.4.......... 'EIlo.PS.....�.�AS�.X..iG.,...B ........ I............
OnsiteRepresentative: ... .�M-L1.CS_lA.J...:...�t �!I�^�..........................................
Certified Operator. ............: 1?�� Ll� 1.t...................................
......................................
Location of Farm:
d Operational /�D�ate Last Operated: ..........................
County: ...........Gl C.VM..
.......................................................
Phone No:.�'AL`I) . Lit -Si �O
....................................................
Phone No:
Integrator: ............—'................................................................
Operator Certification Number :.........................................
Latitude �',� Longitude 0' =° =11
Design ` Current> �_ Design Design Current
''Current
�CtrSwme' Capacity Population. Poultry Capacity,'Population `.Cattle _` A"Capagity Population
. , ❑ Wean to Feeder + ❑ Layer airy 1 1-2-
Feeder to Fipish JLJ Non -Layer I , ❑ Non-Dairy
:x ❑ Farrow to Wean
h ❑ Other
Farrow to Feeder
Ely
;
��
'apaC%ty
❑ Farrow to Finish A Total DesAF
ign `
❑ Gilts „ A
r
r•
R ❑Boars Total SSLW
(Number of Lagoons /1161dmg Ponds �� ❑Subsurface Drains Present jKffLagoon Area ❑ Sprav Field Area _
`�t
u ❑ s No Liquid Waste Management System
,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?.
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it'reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
• Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
ir10
❑ Yes
iaNa-
❑ Yes
03-Nv
❑ Yes
G-rTo
❑Yes
QNo
❑ Yes
I1-?io
❑ Yes
U-No
❑ Yes
tTNo
❑ Yes
9;'No
❑ Yes
i
[B;No
Continued on back

Facility Number: L9—
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes &1,ro
Structures (Lagoons,llolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc,)
40 Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Eo
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: hb « .....`...................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ....... r-_ �. S..'..............................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes B-No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes B-Igb
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ate
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 02fifb
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 2-Ko
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waders of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .... 4:4. � y.................. � r ..1 ....................................... C.A& .t....... q �KL........9 K�5s...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 2090
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
409. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
. No.violations oc deficiencies.were noted -during thkvisit.- You,will i-eceive•no•ftirth.er- :
. c6eres066dehO about -this. visit'.-.',
❑ Yes B-No
❑ Yes UNv
❑ Yes C+9-Ne
❑ Yes [SkNo
❑ Yes O-No
❑ Yes &Pft
❑ Yes 1M-lido
❑ Yes [-io
El Yes [BN -
2) ��.✓j W Cam- CL ALV--U4j (7 -to CJU-t Z 5� (Ar- � ' �@ O".+ .
pr-v bLevn
7/25/97 _

0 D' ision of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other j
Date of Inspection t
Facility Number 'Z
Time of Inspection res 30� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:...........'..`.`'4 [............... W�'1.................!h r County:...........,.I��.�........................................... ....
�p r �......................
OwnerName:.........1�-icz.Mt..1. .............................. k.4�.V....... I ........ .......... ........ Phone No:.a.L.,L.......�Orj .............
FacilityContact: .........................................:.................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:........7.V.-.51.}
2 �L Aj C.
Mailing Address:...... .Y.................... ......C+'R�. ....1�!y"............... :�/. r...... ..{... !.........I.................. ....
Ousite Representative:.. C o'''"...........K.l..f.3~ Integrator ................. ................
'...............................................
Certified Operator;...:?!��.,+)....................................................... Operator Certification Number:..... 2
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0 4 ®" Longitude ®0 ®° 446
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [[ErNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Flyes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field 56ther S'iCDs
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [jrNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [Rf*lo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) [Yes❑ No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N(No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ,[9No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 1.1d/�No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes dNo
1
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes L�1 No
7/25/97

' Facdh y Number: t q
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures AagoonsAolding Ponds, Zlush Pits.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ......... 7..... !................
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 311/;0
❑ Yes
1
I. No
�Structure 5 Structure 6
\\ti .•...........................
.�...........
...................................
❑ Yes
\
❑ Yes
E No
❑ Yes
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Wa to Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
r
15. Crop type ....... D. & -.q-t.tf5.....................? ............................... ...... ......................... T.'.:1....��a.!.us......................<..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 0
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes RITO
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ERR o
19.
is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
slf o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2rYes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑Yes
[�N0
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
CO No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
13<0
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
e No
O- No.violations or. deft;ciertcies. rvere-noted-during this:visit. You.vuill receive-'61t rth:er ;
. coiresp©tidehce about Phis:visit ;
Si�� Suitt Yu#j*j'.v9 eta,-! GT
lti4s At d� t',.4�r,7 r_Veek. W,-iI Nv�`fy NRcs
'rh"A'F" cty .r.rd
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (��(,�_. YX4L._ Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
0 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
[3 Other Agency - Operation Review
e
Dole of Insin-dionFacility Nunhct,Z
....... ....d .-..e„� Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:min)
0 Permitted ❑ Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operaational Date Last Operated:
Farm i\':irnc: ...� .!J; 'ice 4 ^ }Vi.I . L........ County: .......................
u.. ........ ........ Y...........................
OwnerName: ................................................... ............................ ........................................... Plione No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ............................l'itic:.............. ........... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................... ................................................................ '................................ ..................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................ ............................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ............................ . ..................... .............. .......... I ............... I ............. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
................................................................................................................................ I ........ I.............................................................................
Latitude ' 4 4C L.ongitude • _ 49
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gifts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Popplation
❑ Layer I JE] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IQSprayField Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste ivlanagement System
Dischar_Zes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance omn-made`?
h. II' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. 11' discharge is observed. what is the estimated Ilow in "al/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 60
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 51No
Structure 6
Identifier:
1
Freehoard
1/6/99 Continued on ha.

Facility Number: — Elate of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvcment?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markets with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
tit
❑ Yes
D.No
❑ Yes
,�No
❑ Yes
eA
❑ Yes PNo
Wastes Application
10. Arc there any buffers that nced maintenance/improvcment? ❑ Yes / No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑Yes YNO
12. Crop typeC�J.i/r.................................................................................. ................... :..........
.......................................... ..............................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 0 No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16, is there a lack of adequate waste application ecluipment? ❑ Yes t/ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? !
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irri-ation, frceboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect al the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes it No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -sire representative? ❑ Yes No
24., Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Cl 0
No:vi. a.ions:or. deficiencies :were hated: during :t S.viisit:: Yoti will:re�ceiive nay further ::
etirrespotidence' abotit: this visit.:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary).,
15 ( �-
07Ahit1�-H&-,v7-- N �~,5.th� 1�1! 9V
�- 65 S ; 419N to g Cal) s s ; 7�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Ir 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: v Date: 1/6/99

'R&iinei 0 Coiu"laint�ry:O,'Follow=:u PofDoi' .'ins eetion � `0 Follow-bk4f•DSWC•review'-.0x they:
Facility Nuiriber , ' . / a' 'y`
Date,of Inspection'
Ttme,of Intipection�
1Aihr. (hh:rnm).
� - � -.e is � '�,c s s,. � ^:. s' �• .�� L ;L.y �" ' ��i, ' -.
Registered ,Certified O'Applied for Pernut Per tted
r i - ,.:. m.. ,. ��. „ y -
©'Nat't] erationali; 1 Date.Last Operated: ;
lT
N 'F;,u au ` .✓ i i t v $ Z ✓
'
�.........
j e %/��x� e
`.�
"
:Name: `' L)'
county .. ....i�..G.. IK ::.`.:R
- ... ..
...
..
No: ' 9/ y..`./..:.
Owner Name: ....
.... ........................ ............
..........Phone 57 .:.....:Sl
1i acility..Contact::.. :..:.:.: .............. .............: Title:................................................................
Phone No: ............. 1 -
MailingAddress ..:....................
....................... .......... ...................................................
......................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative ............................... L ........... Integrator:.:.......................................................................
t
Certified- erator;.........., t..:................:.........:................. Operator Certification Number:.:....... �.0...-, c� �
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0• 04 46 Longitude 0 7­1' 66
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes tp
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenance/i mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes. No
[IYes �r,'No
CI Yes j] No
ja .YesC. j/J No .'
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes W(No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
Wl5 /Q'7

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes )Z(No
16
Structures (Laeoons.Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes VNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 ' Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier; ............................................. ..................................... .................... .....................................................................:..........
Freeboard(ft):.........................................................................,...................:............................................................................................................
10. 1s seepage observed from any of the structures? -
❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity 4,any of the'structures observed?
❑Yes .[�Na
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes / o N
If an of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
(Y
an immediate public health or environmentaLthreat, notify DWQ)
lK Do any of the structures lack adequate mininium'or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runo entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
!........ GU��S
15. Crop'" ...............................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes VNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El, Yes dNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑.Yes [2rNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes ff No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
ElYes XNO
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes , dNo
, :No.violaidoiii6i iefi,ciencies.were,noted,duringthis.visit.,Yoii:W'ifi ieceiveiio,ft 'irther:"
cO& pOfideiiOfiboidthis.visit.,.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.
p pQ z ass rmx� - .;
wiiji
04'a%%%•T, 2�(_}j����}.�.,. �r ♦ {_����y �.M V V} ilyS{{���-�p Ma
I+„ p NY,i iiR. rF&e"42>o 4Mrn�y��"PM1iy4i: .ly
•� NEc P t-V 9E`n7dvC �2ov,��a7- t*26_�j FFpr� Srd� STa�
7/25/97
y
. ... . . ..... ...
Reviewer/Inspector Name N;s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: { 9

J SWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
w W, :
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
1WRoutine O Complaint O F ollow-up of l)"'O inspection O Follotiv-up of DSNVC revie%v O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: Pertified
e istered ❑ Applii
❑ Pernii
' Inspection 1-1-4-1 [ 117
l[7 U U f Inspeeiion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
_ 'rWnsetion
e (in fraction ot'hours
PiL'�, fr I hr I; min)) Spent on Review
o (includes travel and processing)
DEHN Al IG
Not Operational Date ast Upeii#N�i OFFICE
_.............................................................................................................
Farm Name:A91,V4.`Ci1...... l4V.�'l.!..f�.......... t`Z.'. n.A.......................... Count':. .............
.... ..................................
1/ \o'...........p/ i �. O
Owner Nante:....... r�l..� ......GN f2.r........................................................ ' Ihone
7
{.....,9............ �...... ....,......
Facility Contact: ...` �1vG7..1GC...... .....f71..�G......... Title Gl.L:*�N ....................... Phone N'o•.....,.............��.....,.....................
-7 n. /
Mailing Address: ...t..9. .,..... �...S......L�r14?.✓ I ......!'l.C!f........... Alr........ z 7. �...`7.�...5.......
Onsite Representative....... dti�c .(. Wf2.r... ...... .. Integrator:..........................................................
Certified Operator :..............{ ....... ./.h...t. ..,................. Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm:
�itQlr'1......{,��/TJ..%4.r...........v'�,......J2d.(. c .........�.....t.......G2..... l.� %G......... �...,.....Glb.�^'../`Q.
Q'l1%.........1......./..�rST......�..�.... s
.� 1......�'��r.. ............................. ........... .......................... F.
Latitude �• �c �ca Longitude �• �` �:c
Type of Operation Design Current Design Current
Swine,. Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
El Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Design 'Current
Catty . Capacity Population.,
airy I I jL a
f O
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity / L-
Total SSL W l 6 6 070
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds." ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
.. I-l�
General
L Are there anv buffers that need rnaintenancelimproventent? ❑ Yes ro
2. k any dischar_e observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
I:�i .bar e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. [f discharge i,� observed. ww, thu conveyanc pain -made:'
h. It'dischur-gc is observed. ail[ it reach SUr'taCC Water': (If yes, notify DWQ)
L. Ifdis�har,e k observed. u0hut is the estimated flow in �alirnist:'
d. Ia;t� aiselutr h}'bass a f[rn: a sy�tc nt? t If vt:. notif<< I:)�t Q)
?, is there L:VidCnce of ciisch.trce from any p:rrt ol, the operation:'
4. Wel'C there any ❑Averse iinpuct; :o the waters of the State other than from ;r discharge"
5, f)ocy.ut}' par[ of the t�aae ntart;r�c ntent system (outer'than la_uuns/ltoldirt�� pund�) require
III aintertance/in'rpro% e rnent''
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ N o
❑ Yes
[]No
0 Yes
: ro
El Yes
M/N "
❑ Yes
l
No

�Facility Number: Z
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes O-No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes I(d'N0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes i�f'No
Structures (Lauoons and/or Holding Pon �
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus stornl storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes O_N
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
" l'.'f"'"!'................... ..........................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes VFo
11. is erosion; or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Annlicatir�n
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type,.L...rG"` !'..1r{}......t.....................................................................
�..... V
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2l. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certitied Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes [-9-<O�'/
❑ Yesa
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes' 10
..
........❑Yes ...No
❑ Yes
.............
Cl Yes
❑ Yes
,o
L1 O
es
❑ Yes
,❑,, No
L o
❑ Yes W o/
❑ Y7es
®-IGo
❑ No
. LU e C N PCs) (,V c 9� - ��� s Ua ti 'Z'
�5
Reviewer/inspector Name
1
f Date:
Reviewer/Inspector Signafu
vto17S �
cc: Division of Vater Quality, it"ater Quality Section, Facility ttssessneerrt `Unit 4/30/97

. (TDSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
❑DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ insocetion O Firllow-un of DSWC review
Facility dumber ( 2
Farm Status: ..... —RIC -�
M�
La JUN 19 I9g' l
Date of Inspection 6 -/0
Time of Inspection /D : 3d Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in )tours) Spent ouReview 3.
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: ..F.�'L�I _ _.._ County:.._ 11? 44 A AM _.. ......__ ...�..
Owner tiatne:....2 lva,�W ,/� G✓% i 2�c Phone No:...d..Ll.~
MailinS61 �/ks,6o!L Z73/2—
OnsiteRepresentative: _,..w�_jrr -�% �__�c/i�s- Integrator: f _._ ..Cra..! ...�.... �.`v!. ._..... �......_
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: — g 6'a _ ..
Location of Farm:
.4C �cLf�bo�
Latitude Longitude ofJ_j
tJu'` Z
10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity ,ct1i1R'�} `
r ik m s^
Sw:>IKum
ine �ber n-*Paultty k r� -Number ay Cattle{ uNtiivlaeez� a>�
:w ,
p,
❑Wan to Feeder ❑Laver ff Dairy F
Ole, to Finish n o �� ❑Non Laver I ❑ Beef
Farrow to Wean d '
Farrow to Feeder : Y
10 Farrow to Finish -'' Other Type of Livestock' "
...
Numbernf-'L atRs f HaldtngPonds x . ❑Subsurface Drains Present '
❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field AreaM�.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0-90
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ iQo
a- if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Cl Yes 0-t o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes El -No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/thin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑/-'Yes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse imparts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Dues any part of the wasre management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require ❑ Yes NO
maintenance.(improvernent?
Continued on back

I
!:'-mid the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/1/97)?
4 Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structitres 1La2oons and/or HoldinLf2ridsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I LaE!oun 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
I I . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was apswered yes, and the situation poses in
immediate public health or enviroameotal threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvenienO
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Oniv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with owner or operator in charge?
U
CdraAttngsIt
*-19to- Cii6i
y".....uez. .
❑ Yes [Z No
Dyes ONo
El Yes 0-<No
Lagoon 4
13 Yes 19'go
0 Yes ENo
El yes alfo
C3 Yes M_�10
El Yes
❑ Yes M<'O
Ej Yes 21,1o'
❑ Yes ONo
El Yes U-N-i-o
0 Yes 0 No
El Yes 0 NO
El Yes C1 NO
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7
1 RevieNver/Inspector Name A/-`
Revisverflnspector Signature: //t'.1W1-;1 1z Date:
cc: Division of Water Qualin', Water Quality Section. Facility Assessment Unit 1 E/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources XT?WA�aja
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor 1DEiHNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 31, 1997
Mr. Ronald G. White
1794 Epps Clark Road
Siler City, North Carolina 27344
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
.Facility # 19-32
Ronald White Farm
Chatham County
Dear Mr. White:
On July 29, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the cattle operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that operations
were proceeding according to your approved Animal Waste Management
Flan. As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be
in compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
J y Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Mike Sturdivant, Chatham Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%"SC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Date of Inspection i q
l � 2
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
&Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection (includes travel and orocessim
❑� Not
-O.peerattio al Date Last Operated:......_.......................... _.............. _....... __.............. _................ _........ ............... ....... ................
Farm Name:.Y-U,v..�Uj,[J_...n..0........ C�Y�irh.............................. _...... , County: ... h\!!C11�.............. ........................
Land Owner Name: ...t-t Y.1G ^ �.. �i......_....................... _........ Phone No: _���11. �15�:.................................
c- ���(�,�
Facility Conctact:..2oY�t '`'..:. ....WW�............. Title: _ W .................... PhoneNo:... OINV& ............................
Mailing Address, E G�Gaf�L QiL� S%%
_d?......................._...................f..................
Onsite Representative: ... ,;�!•��(i! .
Certified Operator: .... Y.�..,�.........................................
Location of Farm: %LkC,4✓1 gN1�,Nh1(. \ (2 Vv„ ,e r_nKN
Latitude =*=,="
Type of Operation and Desten Cavacib
Wean to
Other
2'l
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: ................... .........
Longitude O• =' =N
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Geld ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97
maintenance/improvement?
Field
❑ Yes ®'lffo
❑ Yes ®-No
❑ Yes ®-NO,
❑ Yes M'/o
,
❑ Yes <o
❑ Yes l�o
Continued on back

" * Fite dity Number: ... %%
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? n� ❑ Yes [ Flo
as �vbti Lev d` Q C iCN� -kt0 ��b�etL, c3� dry►- \�; V19 Wr�rtr WCY�
7. Did the facility fai lto have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes Mlo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Sit MEtures (JtR ot)c anti/or fielding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
.. .......... _. ............................ ...........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes M-110
❑ Yes P'No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?�1c�
Wgste Application . . ^�v\-A-eA
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........ ................... r"',. ��:�..... ...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certifled Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes OKo
❑ Yes ❑<o
❑ Yes P-no
❑ tcs ❑ No
❑ Yes EP466
❑ Yes &Ko
❑ Yes [R<o
❑ Yes 02-'ICfo
❑ Yes 9190
❑ Yes ❑-
❑ Yes &1-0
M-les ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments {refer to question #} ' Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments'1,4 �
Use diawmgs;of. facility to bedd tter exblam situations ;`(use aitioral bages as necessary). _, ti° %f ..'
e_'Oh%;[�tt-Y 4
�� �xsv�a. bu ot;cc��-
�Y'(tit►r��q� .r. ;�r��,��.. -- ' •C,u�lo�'1c..�C� ��l�(.. ��.t1C�_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
December 5, 1996
Ronald White
Ronald White Farm
1794 Epps Clark Road
Siler City NC 27344
Dear Mr. White:
mw�
IDEHNR
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Ronald White Farm
Facility ID M 19-32
Chatham County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification,as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System y� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certfflcatlon Commission � An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/1(M post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Ronald White
Route 1, Box 528
Siler City, NC 27344
ILFX?FA
PT.- j--
�EHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 29, 1995
Subject: Compliance Inspection
White Dairy Operation
Farm No. 19-32
Chatham County
Dear Mr. White:
On October 30, 1995, Mr. Ted Cashion from this office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection is a part of the
Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this facility was
not discharging to the surface waters of the State. No manmade pipes, ditches,
or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging
wastewater) were observed.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of Environmental
Management is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect
the natural resources of the State.
This office also reminds you that, if not already accomplished, an approved
animal waste management plan must be incorporated by December 1997. Thin
must be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
if you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Mr. Cashion at
919--571-4700.
Sincerely,
Sudy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\whiteron.ins
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUL_14--1995 15= =e FROM GE!`I WATER OUpl_ I T`r SECT I ON TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Anenbor
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT %9 , 34
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAI IONS SrM vISITATION RECORD
DATE: ©`to` 3 b,.I995
p Timer
Farm Name/Owrter_ I�OnA aj w e
Mailing Address:(
County: Ck. fka ^
Integrator. Phone:
On Site R epmse=ztive:. _ -- - -- Phone:.
Physical Addres:sJL.acaERw:
Type of Operation: Swine Pottliry Cztde ��•'"�
.� . .
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:-
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: �. Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Dees the rtuimal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 ycar 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: _ __` [. O Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la u(s)? Yes or N@ Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate land available for spray? �Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? �;)or No
�
Cmg(s) being Utilized: r�� s t �' e � s
--T
Does the facility meet SCS mutimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? s �r No ::;' •:f :
�:c animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes "x& -
xiimal waste land applied or spray irrigated within'25 poet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or�N+�
animal- waste discharged into waters of the state by mart -made ditch, flushing system, or other �
•,irnilar man-made devices? Yes or& if Y--s. Please Explain.
7)4res tnr rac.-ility.maimain adequare waste rawiagemcnt.records (volumes of tuanure, land applied.
Spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Cornmenrs:
v e e, �t �' 3 fret r v e/ a t-/ ,' L.,
Si gnarw"e
cc: Faciliry Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02