070027_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

?\A.fQ
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
March 24, 1998
Mr. John Winfield
1932 Creek Road
Pinetown, NC 27865
A kF.X?FA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESoURCES
SUBJECT: Operation Review Report for Winfield Hog Farms,
Facility Number 07-27, Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Winfield,
Enclosed is the March 12, 1998 Operation Review report entered for Winfield Hog Farms, facility
number 07-27. Please note the comment section on page 2.
This report is to serve as confirmation for your request for removal to remove your operation from the
active section of the state's database. Ultimately, it will be up to the Division of Water Quality to grant
the operation's request into inactive status. For complete removal from the database, the operation
must be depopulated and the waste structures must be properly closed in accordance with NRCS
Standard #998, and verified by a designated technical specialist. Contact the Beaufort Soil and
Water Conservation District for additional information on lagoon closure.
The Division of the Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation
Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 252/946-6481 if you have any questions, concerns or
need additional information.
Sincerely,
?.t -il pz-
Pat Hooper
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Beaufort Soil & Water Conservation District
WaRO Division of Water Quality
943 Washington square Mall. Washington, North Carolina 27839-3532 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Koutme p tOulplaint p rollow-up of DMI Inspection p rollow-up of yaws review p utner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered p Certified p Applied for Perini In Notper$ Iona Date Last Operated: 411193
Farm Name:.121.'infix1d.Hug.Farms................................................................................... County: Beaufort WaRO
Owner Name: Jabs........--- -............... .......... Winfield .................................................... Phone No: 9.6.4-.4941 ................. .................................................
Facility Contact: .Iohn.W..inf1,eld....... • ........................................Title: owner ............. .................. ............ -...... Phone No: 9191946-4942............ ..........
.
Mailing Address: 1432. Creeklu...._............................................................................... PinttaW,n..N.0 .... .......... .......................................... 27865 ..............
Onsite Representative: SEE .COMMENT.5EC.TION............................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©■ ®"
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Fee er
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Operator Certification Number:
Longitude ®■ ®' ®"
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer Vairy
p Non -Layer on- airy
Other
Total Design Capacity 575
Total SSLW ,
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds 2 Subsurface Drains Presentgoon Area p Spray Field Area
o Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p Na
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No
7/25197

. r
It-scilityNumber: _ 7 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
13 No
Structures (Lagoons,NoldinizPonds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ..mnallsmuawre... ...large.structure.................. -
Freeboard (ft): 3.5 3.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
13 Yes
13 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
13 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.......................................................................... ......................................... .---•--..---.....---...............................---.............---.................................--.---..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
0 Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
t3 Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
onQ ions.ori'ecis•were.oeuing is v1s1t- oa will.reeeive nu further •. ..:
. ........
ere5pondtxje�NljtY. . - .............................
.. . .. . . .
R"!SO-FOAM.z
a:treer:taquesnj:�xpanany�answersanlvr.any.recommerrtaonsor-,anyereomm_ens�Frawiii 'of faeii #a:betier, lain sitnations: tue additioia[ a as iiaecessa _;° tt}
�.. .fin Via.+. �S�'F:�Y.+•-.�
This,Review to serve as confirmation for Request for Removal - no hogs on site during site visit on 3/12/99.
Permissiari'to access site granted by phone by Mr. Winfield on 318198. He asked me to contact Mr. David Burbage for date when
nperatiaa was'depnpulated since Mr. Burbage had leased the farm. Talked to Mr. Burbage by phone on 3/16/98. Operation was
depopulated nn 411193. -
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name �_`� ,- a : § --�"` .,`w ." , ' Pz".. .� "' _ . ; :: •.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT ❑PERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: n1(- Q7A , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/owner: Vj;
Mailing Addre s:
County: a
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Locati
a
.Phone:
Type c4 Operation: Stine �� -Poultry( _ Cattle [
Design Capacity: _ r)r'j t1a. of Animals on Site,y��p
DEM Certification No.: DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude:�G •?�[]-SNLong itudet- 2aitjEievation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard_ of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft C�__ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Ha
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No V p„u,ti
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: _t) g�' V-0, i3 ,,,,,L
Does the facility meet SC inimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes or Nv 100 Ft from Wells? Yss or No
Is the al waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes o No
r
Is animal waste and applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Slue
Line? Yes a No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or", 1
If Yes, please explain: �J
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manur
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or a
PAA1_^,AA M pnw� /
sp ctor Name jSig ature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments:
.�.
Sketch:
D�Wio Gu
t h v—__