20050344 Ver 1_Complete File_20050221

E'nV
Environmental Consulting Services Inc.
3764 Rominger Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Ph/Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
February 17, 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC DENR DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
FEB 2 1 ?005
RE: The Lodges at Elkmont, Avery County, NC
Dear Ms. Karoly:
DENR - WATER QUALITY
1`2X1 .,,D3/,'V 8TOn".tn, A A
TER LBiWSCH
Transmitted with this letter are 3 copies of the 404/401 permit application for the referenced project.
The application is for a NWP 39 and NWP 12 and WQC 3402. Proposed impacts are 147 linear feet of
first order intermittent stream. There are no wetland impacts on this project. Based on my
understanding of WQC 3402 no written certification is required. No fee has been included at this time.
The applicant is The Lodges at Elkmont, LLC, Mr. Ken Haigler contact. E'nV Inc. is the consultant and
alternate contact. Please include me on the copy list of all project related correspondence.
If you have any questions regarding these items please call me at 828-297-6946, thank you.
Sincerely,
John C. Vilas
President, E'nV Environmental Consulting Services Inc.
cc: Mr. Alan Crees
Mr. Kevin Barnett
Mr. Ken Haigler
o5-o344
A, Tr
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Chapin, Permit Coordinator
Asheville Office. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
l,?j FEB 2 3 2005
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program ti DEN R. WATER LITV ?}{
DATE: February 21, 2005
SUBJECT: Review of 404 Application, The Lodge at Elkmont, NWP 39 and NWP 12, Shawneehaw
Creek, Avery County
The applicant is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The NCWRC
has reviewed information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with
habitat values of the project area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the
Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat.
401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The applicant proposes to impact 147 linear feet of headwater intermittent jurisdictional stream. No
wetlands are indicated for the site. Mr. Kevin Hining, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
biologist previously visited the area on or about December 29, 2002. Mr. Hining determined that wild
rainbow trout are present in the area although streams area is not Designated Public Mountain Trout
Water. Brown trout are present downstream. Banner Elk has recently restored portions of Shawneehaw
Creek. Headwater areas provide important protection for downstream aquatic habitats.
Based on the information provided by the applicant and our knowledge of the range of trout in the project
area, we will not object to the project provided the following recommendations are implemented:
1. The proposed bridge crossing should completely span the creek without interfering with
natural floodplain functions associated with stormwater and flood water passage.
2. Any instream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide buffer zone are
prohibited during the trout spawning season of October 15 through April 15 to protect the
egg and fry stages of trout from off-site sedimentation during construction.
3. Stringent erosion control measures should be installed where soil is disturbed and
maintained until project completion. Stream banks in these areas should also be seeded
with an approved wetland seed mix or temporary crop of wheat or rye. Temporary
ground stabilizing vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within five (5) days of
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service ;enter • tcaicign, NLI
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Lodge at Elkmont 2 February 21, 2005
ground disturbance (if not immediately) to provide erosion control. As appropriate,
sediment and erosion control measures should adhere to the design standards for sensitive
watersheds (15A NCAC 413 .0024).
4. For any stream crossing, bridges are preferred and recommended. Any pipes or culverts
48" diameter or larger should be buried a foot into the streambed while culverts less than
48" diameter should be buried to a depth equal to or greater than 20% their size to allow
for aquatic life passage. These measurements must be based on natural thalweg depths.
Natural stream and floodplain dimensions and geomorphic conditions must be maintained
at stream crossings.
5. Stormwater management and spill containment facilities can reduce potential impacts
from spills or hazardous materials and minimize hydrograph modifications. We
recommend the use of Low Impact Development (LID) stormwater techniques like those
found at,\-\\-\v]oN\-imRactde-,,clopnicnt.or! for parking lots and landscaping if impervious
area increases are anticipated in the future.
6. Where stream buffers have been disturbed and/or reduced, the twenty-five (25) foot trout
buffer zone should be restored and revegetated with native riparian plant species for
streambank stabilization and shade. This should help mitigate for previous land
disturbing activities and lost wetland functions. Streambanks can be revegetated with
silky dogwood, rhododendron, dog hobble, red maple, silky willow, tag alder, black
willow, sycamore, or other native woody species to provide long term bank stability and
stream shading. Note that silky dogwood, silky willow and black willow can be planted
as live stakes collected during the dormant growing season. Cuttings should be randomly
planted and done on four (4) foot centers from the waters edge to the top of the bank.
Trees should be planted on ten (10) to twelve (12) foot centers.
7. Permanent deed restrictions or conservation easements should be placed on all remaining
jurisdictional waters, wetlands and stream buffers. These areas should not be subdivided
as parts of lots. Instead, these buffer areas should be preserved as common undisturbed
or restored forested buffers and green spaces.
8. If any concrete will be used, work must be accomplished so that wet concrete does not
contact or affect stream water. This will lessen the chance of altering the stream's water
chemistry and causing a fish kill.
9. The US Fish and Wildlife Service or the NC Natural Heritage Program should be
contacted for concurrence due to listed species that are present in Avery and Watauga
Counties. The applicant should contact the NC Division of Land Resources for any
necessary trout buffer waivers and also notify the Division of Water Quality.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336-769-9453.
Cc: John Vilas, E'nV
Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Kevin Barnett, DWQ
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank. U ???0 V L5 D
D
I Processing
FEB 2 1 2005
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit DENR - WATER QUALITY
l'.r WJDSAND5TOuATERMICH
F] Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39 and NWP 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: X
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Lodges at Elkmont LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 4108
Wilmington NC 28406
Contact: Mr. Ken Haider
Telephone Number: 910-762-2000 Fax Number: 910-762-7766
E-mail Address:
AlternaWContacts`-
Environmental Consultant - John Vilas E'nV Inc: [phone]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 11
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
I. Name of project: The Lodges at Elkmont
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 185900935310 and 185900938077
4. Location
County: Avery Nearest Town: Banner Elk
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From the intersection of Hwy
194 and Hwy 184 take Highway 194 north out of Banner Elk go approximately 1.3 miles
and the site is on the left side of the road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36 10' 13" N / 81 50' 55" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Rural
- residential-and at;ricaltural prasture.
7. Property size (acres): 16.1 acres approximately
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Shawneehaw Creek, a class C trout
stream
9. River Basin: Watauiza
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a townhome development in an
old pasture The project will involve the construction of a road from Hwy 194, across
Page 2 of 1 I
Shawneehaw Creek and up the slope to access 10 multi-family townhome buildings. The
construction of the road will result in impacts to 145 linear feet of a small unnamed tributary
to Shawneehaw Creek (19-Shawneehaw Creek) The proposed road will also involve a
bridge across Shawneehaw Creek This bridge is to replace an existing wooden bridge at the
same location The proposed bridge will completely span Shawneehaw Creek with the
abutments drilled and anchored into bedrock. Due to the extent of bedrock at this location
there will be no excavation required below the stream water surface elevation. The bridge
will span 40 feet the bankfull width of the stream is approximately 25 feet at this location
and no adjacent wetlands exist in this area.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Standard construction
equipment: track excavator, backhoe dump truck
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Rural residential agricultural and
undeveloped. low density.
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously 'issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous USACE 404 permits or NCDENR 401 permits have been used to develop this
property -- -
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No additional 404/401 permit requests are anticipated for any planned future
development of this property
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Page 3 of 11
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts Impacts include, but arc not limited lo: mecuamzcd cicanng, grading, wr,
excavation, flooding, ditcldng1drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.-
" 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps arc available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/hvww.feTna.rov..
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.22 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im ct Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
Area 1 Pipe 120 UT Shawnechaw Creek 3' intermittant
Area 2 Rip rap apron 25 UT Shawnechaw Creek 3' intcrmittant
Area 3 Bridge 0 Shawnechaw Creek 25' Perennial

Area 4 Utility line:
temporary
2 UT2-Shawnceliaw
Creek 4' Perennial

Page 4 of I 1
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilisation activities (cement Wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightcning, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
RR Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uscs.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.t0207one.com,
www.M'1Vquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 145' intermittent..
2' perennial
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Watcrbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

f 11 atior Bred ' r
cd v
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not hmrt to. r , exca r, gu g,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be-created-in-(check-all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
Page 5 of 11
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Several proposed site layouts were explored during the initial design process but none were
found that completely eliminated impacts to waters of the US while also meeting the developers
minimum design criteria The proposed site layout avoids impacts to Shawneehaw Creek by
crossing this stream with a 40' single span bridge the existing wooden bridge in this location is
30' long. A wetland area of approximately 0.22 acres in size exists in the southeast corner of the
site. Earl designs showed some impacts to this area but these have now been avoided-, there will
be no wetland impacts on this project. The unavoidable stream impacts with this project are
located along UT Shawneehaw Creek Approximately 145 linear feet of this small stream will be
impacted (1201 f pipe impact and 25 If rip rap apron) adjacent to the main road winding up
through the project Large boulders will be substituted for rip rap at the pipe outlet if possible.
In order to keep the proposed road slope below 18% much of the roadbed will be constructed on
compacted fill The toe of this fill slope if left unretained would impact several hundred feet of
UT Shawneehaw Creek A retaining wall is proposed to keep the fill out of the stream this wall
will be constructed within the 25 foot trout buffer but trees and shrubs will be established both
above and below the wall This project will be served by municipal water and sewer from the
Town of Banner Elk Approximately 5000 IT of 8" water-main and 8" sewer line will be
extended up NC 194 to the project site These lines will be installed in the shoulder of the
existing road The lines will be installed under several streams' all but one of these crosses HM
194 throw h a concrete box culvert and the lines will be bored under causing no impact. The one
pipe crossing will be trenched causing a temporary impact approximately 2 feet wide.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, -published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
Pap 6 of 11
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ide.html.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwet]ands/stnny
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
UT-Shawneehaw Creek isa small stream with a bankfull width of 3 to 5 feet this stream is
heavily impacted by cattle grazing and trampling The right side of this channel is flanked by
a steep wooded slope for its entire length but the left side is only sparsely vegetated. The
mitigation proposed for this project will involve planting shrubs and trees along the left bank
of this channel both above and below the proposed pipe between the channel and the
proposed retaining wall Proposed shrubs will include willow and dogwood live stakes and
native rhododendron Trees proposed will include maple and birch.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hnpl/h2o enr stale. ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No X
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 7 of 11
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Trout Buffers Temporary impact
from fill 'the area will be stabilized and reveaetated V
Yes ? No X If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Miti lion
1 3
2 1.5
Total
, Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; L.ODC L exicnos an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservatiotr Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Predevelopment impervious area is limited to one single family house and several outbuildings
that covers approximately 3000 sq ft Post development impervious cover is proposed to be
approximately 3.3 acres which will result in a site imperviousness of approximately 20%.
Page 8 of I 1
XIL Sew2ze Diapoaal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge, or discharge) of
wastewater genc=ed from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The applicant has Ugpojed to extend water and sewer lines from the Town of Banner Elk to the
pr icO site This will eliminate the need for any on-site in ground septic gygtem
ME. Vialatians (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0500) or any Buffcr Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes? NOx
XIV. Other Cireumzt um (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processirU time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to li.-t constrai= associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
71
s

(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from tho applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
AsbevWcRegulatory Field Office Alexander Ch--okw Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Rn&cu- Avcry Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patina Avenue lluucomba CL-,TUad Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burko Gaston Macon Rutbatbrd
Asheville, NC 2UO1-5406 Caba is GnhzM Madison S=Icy
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDOWC11 SWj- II
Fax: [phone] C=,Pb r Heudersoa MecWcuburg Tmnsytvaniia
Past 9 of I I
Z -d 9*69LGZt3ZB dLe : b0 SO ST qaA
Vicinity Map for Elkmont Project

L
0

. t

,-
(
1
?
? ?t
??
_,; _1
\1,
,
? / J;
,f• ?%,???
D 7

N-I

77
11 f
1R ¦
Valle Crucis Topographic Quadrangle *Map not to scale
Aerial Photo with Parcel Map for Elkmont Project
Approximate Boundary of hucmont Project
offiffina
a